The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVR-82-0000 - Supplemental - 1041 Shelburne Road (2)September 15, 1982 Mr. Douglas Bouvier Doug's Gulf 1041 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Doug: Be advised that the Zoning Board of Adjustment has granted your request for a zoning variance. Your application for a license will be processed.by the,City-Council. The Board will issue formal findings at a later date. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative officer RW/mcg r ` r 'i.nd .ngs in accordanr,r with :,-cti on 1,45f., of the plan! i nv %;`v"l onmenI ^, c t. (I) That there arr= unirue physical circumst..nces or conditions, including irregularit , narrowness, or shallowne5rs of lot size or sham:, or exceptional toporrap}:icel or other physl(�al conditions peculiar to the particl.tl' property, and that th^ unnecessary hardship is due to suc conditions, and not the circuu►stances or conditions gener y created b% the provisions of the zon nv, regulations in t neighborhood or distrir�t in which the- propf rty is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstancr,s or condition-, there is no possibility that the property, can to doveloned in strict conformity with the n_rovisions or the zonir.c- rprulati.ons Inc? that the authorization of a_yar.iance is therefor- mlcessary to enabl.t t"e reasonable i�se o he pr. operty ; (3) That such unnece _ary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the va ance, iP authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in whist; the property is located, nor substantially or nermanently,impair thr annrcpriate use or develonment of-djac'nt..property, nor ti.e d,.trimental to t<<e public welfare; and T r) Tr:at the vari'wnce, 9f authorized, wi'l r(-.,oresc'nt thy'• minimum variar:ce that will afford relief and will represent th, 1-ast modification possit.ie of the znri.n�- regulations and ofEj npeal Da t e Vote: Yes Na ':i:;t findings, below: 1.1 �1\1 C) � �,"iV ��11 �,vlr ��1� � �' .. �i� ii, .�r '•.ii, i• 'i.rndi.nrs in accordanoc with 13ect:i on 1,4bf of the i'l.anrinp, & DovF,I opment. A c t: (1 That there arr, uniquF, physical c.ircumst ancef7' or conditions, including irreial :rite: , narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exec9tional topograpf-Acel or other physical conditions peculiar to the particl.lar property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b,, the provisions of the zon{riv, regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; El (2) 'A'hat because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the n_rovisions or the zonin, rPpulations and that thr: authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; D (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appel.l ant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair tY:e annrcpriate use or development of idjac-ent property, nor tie d,.trimental to tr,e. public welfare; and E j r) Teat the variance, if authorized, will reOT-Ps-Int thc, minl.mum va-iance that will afford relief and will rc-present th, l=ast modification possitie of the zori.n� regulations and of ti�r` plar. ppeal Vote: Yes No SIrn d 1-7 List findings below: I. .� :.J tl �)��.A .�f. tt 4i-. l�r.f ��/\.� -1��.. 1�� 1 rl•�..�.. .' ..� 'i.r�di.ngs in ac,cordanc:- wi th ; F,ct;i on 1,46f,of the 1_,znr incl ;x vF 1 opment• n c t. (1) That there arr�_ uniquE, physical ci r. cumst nce:- or conditions including i_rree�ul=:pit , narrownF.s:-, or s�:a.11owness of lot size or shape, or exct ptional topograpt:ice.3 or other physical conditions peculiar to thr particii1ar property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due t:o mich conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b-, tr�e provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or distri.ct in which the propi-rty is located; 0 (2) 'That because of such physical circumstanc=-s or conditions., there is no possibility that the propert;�, can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions or thc= zonimr regulations and that the authorization o' a variance 1:� therefore m7'cessary to enahle ti,e reasonable nse of the property; (' (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appe1.1 ant; 0 (4) 7hat the variance, iP authorized, w411. not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or diCtric•t in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the annrcpriate use or development of-dja(,ent• property, nor I-- detrimental to tr,e public welfare; and E'( (r) That the variance, if authorized, wi 11 rop.resr,nt thr. :ni.r,i?r.um variance that will afford rel.i.ef an(will represent th.- 1,=ast. modification nassil:le of the zori.nr regulations and of .appeal`'_/_------931TZ Vote: Yes No �.� Sir-n�!! I.1 st findings below: 3. 77 ( :J �!ili �1 !-1.1 �.i. lei �.e T ..i\� .\'1\ � 1V! i �L.,lu.i ... ...�� •'irndings in ac(-ordanoc with :.'action 144bf' of the Plan-ing 11)r'.vf1opment. r:Ct (1) That there are unique physical circumst nces or conditions, including irrerularit;, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograpF:icn.l or other physical conditions peculiar to the :articular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b-, the provisions of the zon-fnv regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the propi�=rty is located; Im (2) 'What because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be dove oiled in strict conformity with the provisions of the zonin- regulations and that the authorization o`' a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property ; m (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 1 (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair thp. annropriate use or development of adjac=)nt property, nor I-c d,:trimental to tr,e public welfare; and (r) That the variance, if authorized, wi 11 r(--,presen1L. th'." "1ir?',?^urn vari.«rce that will afforc? relief and will represent tho 1-3st modification possil:le of the zoring regulations and of ti: rula.� ppeal „_-A/ — ------ DatP_ Vote: Yes No list findings below: 2s 3 1r`i 1 r rj 7 l if.�.1��.; rT, 'i.r:dings in ac(,ordan(,c with '.-Action 141+6�" of the Plam,inf� -1 ':opmerit: Act, (1) That there arr- unique physical circumstances or conditions, including i.rreularit•, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, o- exr-rational topcgrapt:i.crl or other physical conditions pecul.iar to t;h," partic11l,'-1r property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b-1 the provisions of the zonfrig regulations in,the neighborhood or district in which the property Is located; F71 (2) ';'hat because of such physical ei.rcumstane-,s or condition-,., there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions or the zoninf- regulations and that thy- authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable t. ,e reasonable iTse of the property; L=! (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by t.n appellant; E (4) `?'hat the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the annrepriate use or development of-djacent ,property, nor 11�e d�.trimental to tr;e public welfare; and 171 the variance, if autl'lorized, will reOT'eS�-'-)i, thE' min:'.rr.um vajar,,,e that will. afford relic-" anc will represent th , 1. -ast. moni ficatinn pcssi ALe of the zori.ng regulations and of .Mppeal 1.at•ea r 11 nt Vote: Yes N,a List findings below: 1. V V'`ULl.7 �i•�'1 �/ 44./�L �'"4 / V-t-�JLLL�'ai /ice' / "C� 5 ��> �..wrww�+�...u..•rrwws�. �.._ �...�-r.r..�.r��r..`.-r.+.�..�. �.r.._-t w..--r �_��.?�. +w.—�. �".�.�._ _.�..�..w.—.�—�....�.. F- �� )1T r v1�ij i) �...�_�... X. �_�'�,� jC i�l'. �� r T��.� �. , .'�Utl li �. ,'1 ,4�'1 in ac.c•ordanoc with ;;e'ction i46P of the '1.an!'in�' <` f)r•vF-lopment. Al c t (.L) That there arcs unicu-, py:ysical c.ircumstances or conditions, including i.rreirularit- , narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shane, or, execptional topograpt.icel or other physical conditions peculiar to thr particlil•3r property, and that th^ unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b;; the provislons of the zonjrng regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) '!hat because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the nrovisions of the zonin - regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enat;l_e the reasonable i1se of the property; ff (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) What the variance, it authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the Property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the annrcpriate use or development of -idjac=ant. property, nor rye detrimental to tr,e public welfare; and Lvi fir} That the vari -,nee, if authorized, wi ?] rrr�-presF-rt thr. mini.munj vari.an-ce ghat will afforc relief and will represent thr� I-ast. modification posciI IP of the zori.ng regulations and of *ll— pl,-tr. Appeal 7414 -a t Vote: Yes` .:ist findings below: No 0 5i.rn ----- __ . 2. _ @x-, P- ! - c�