Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-76-0001 - Supplemental - 1041 Shelburne RoadZI/ Y 1 I-ovember -) 9 1",76 r t t :'Xcnue ..ens--elaer, '.,:1 12144 Dear I',' I r. ,)'wctt: Uhat the LuI:h __.urlir,:,ton 7cnin- Ioar. -j.' _djust- ..as denied ycur reque!s' -or a zonin,,; variance. -. he -- oai,,.. FindS that this request a".oes not conform �.ith oct.`_cn I,L61' of the Vermont "unicipal Planning and evelopment ",ct. This 0;-fiCe 4 is,,uc an occupancy perr,�it for a self- sorvice, Irl,as station u,"on J�our request. If you have any qu�2stions, !,eel fr:,e to ccntaC,-C, ..e. -,,.,/j r y truly, Richard Ward r 7pic�-r .� f Zoning Administrative , SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; El (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 0 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 1i (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential__ character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and EJ (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal #. Da to Appellant Vote: Yes Q No Sign List findings below: 1. 2. SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 41+68 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b3, the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; ❑ (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; ` (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the __ appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date e Appellant Vote: Yes Q No ,,J List findings below: 2. 3 l Appeal # Sign SOUTH BUR LINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTNENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b3, the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; El (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 12 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; H (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal Date//////V/ Appellant � C Vote: Yes Q No adrna' Sign , T.i ct f'i nri i nvc -hal niv? 1. 2. 9 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; El (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 1 1 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date d Appellant Vote: Yes Q No List findings below: 2. 3. Appeal # -.57 Sign