HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-76-0000 - Supplemental - 1041 Shelburne RoadMarch .2, 1976
Gulf Cil Company
430 Solar 'r'.'trcet
Oyracuse I yy 13204
Attention: T'r. Gerald C. Jackson
:)ear "r. Jackson:
Tc, advised tho�.t the cuth Tur.linf_-ton 'cninf:- Toar(l of Adjust-
rient has �,rantcO -,�-,rova.l o_" --our recuest for a variance based
on ollowin!7, findinc-s:
1) that lot J' 'n existanee, prior to effective date of
city rrulations;
2) minimum variance that could br, --ranter) to cont-inue
the reasonable use of thk, property; and
o r..'orr�tf Ge,etior,,
of the Ve-ront Planning
an T-'evelopment.-
ct.
You have been S(-+eftled to a, near beforthe Planning
Commission for site plan review on 7uk-sr1,F_y, March 9, 1.976 at
� 7:30 p.m. in the City Ilal] , Conference - "._' .00M.
My recommend:�tions re.-ardin, thy, landscaping (to .ttorney
Collins) is that an ewr-rPer. screr-n be planted along the
north and sruth property lir, s, pl.antin��'s 1�e five feet on
center, four to five feet in height and the planted area in
bet-wreen the curb cuts be increased in size.
_nclospd is a copy showin.1c, the area in question.
1' you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Very truly,
Richard ',,',:rd
Zonin� "dnministrative G"ficer
P% , '1j
:j'nclosure
SOUTH BUR LINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTINFENT
?findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development
Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions
peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary
hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances
or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning
regulations in theneighborhood or district in which the property
is located;
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there
is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that
the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property;
(3) That such upnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant;
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the
-
appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be
detrimental to ti;e public welfare; and
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan.'
Da t e
.,,.., X7
Vote: Yes
List findings below:
tj
2.
I
No
Appeal m
Sign w�
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development
Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions
peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary
hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances
or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning
regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located; Z
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there
is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that
the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property; 0
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant;
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'.
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the
appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be
detrimental to the public welfare; and EJ
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. a
Appeal #
Date _ �,� -- f _ "��
Appellant__ � Z
Vote: Yes No Sig4-74.
4�&
List findings below:
1.
2.
3.