The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSP-76-0000 - Supplemental - 0960 0966 Shelburne Road,o�J9 6. PLANNING COMMISSION 1 DECEMBER 14j__1226 Mr. Page explained he was looking at the potential subdivision for lot #1 and the potential subdivision of the back portion, and in the event that the back lot might be sold the Planning Commission should make clear that there should be a certain type of access. Mr. Poger said the right of way should be reserved even if they did not intend to use it. The motion by Mr. Poger was voted unanimously for approval. DesLauriers Tennis Facility, Dorset Street. Continued Site Plan Review Mr. Page announced this had been withdrawn. Burlington Savings Bank Drive-in Facility, Shelburne Road .Site Plan Review James Lamphere, architect for the Burlington Savings Bank, made a presenta- tion based on a packet of material of which copies had been given to the Commission members. A Site Plan was displayed on which Mr. Lamphere indicated the boundaries of the property which consists of two lots, the entrance, the landscaping, both existing and planned, the stone wall to be built, and a floor plan of the proposed building. He stated the utilities are there, the water to come in from Shelburne Road, the storm sewer would go out into an existing system, the sanitary sewer would be tied into the existing line which presently handles one of the houses on the property. The setback from Shelburne Road is 75 feet and they would be 22 feet from the back property line. He indi- cated the existing trees to be preserved and those which will have to be removed. The new trees to be planted will be 6 feet high and they will try to keep them from getting too high to avoid breaking up the visual impact of the building. Some of the trees to be planted by the wall will be cubs for color in the spring. The existing hedges are to be retained, and they will maintain Mrs. Farnham's hedge by clipping once a year. Construction is to begin in April, with landscaping planting s to take place in the fall. The estimated cost of landscaping is $4,200, and the contractor will be prepared to post a bond before the building permit is issued. Under the zoning requirements, their size of 1400 square feet would require 7 parking spaces; they will have 10 spaces. Regarding traffic, they had made studies as outlined on page 1 of his sub- mitted material. He noted the difference in volume between a savings bank and a commercial bank, saying this bank would have about 45% the volume of a commercial bank such as the Merchants Bank across the street. Regarding traffic circulation, Mr. Lamphere said the only area where there is any question is the out -lane on to Brewer Parkway, but they expect the maximum cars they would get would be 20, so there would be plenty of capacity. Referring to Mr. Szymanski's memo of December loth, Mr. Lamphere said the sidewalk would be no problem, but the connecting road is something they really would not want to see happen. Mr. Page said he had talked with Mr. Szymanski about this and told him there would be a problem with the outbound capacity of Brewer Parkway and connect- ing the properties could have an impact on that, and Mr. Szymanski had agreed it would not be essential to require that. Mr. Page said he went down and courted the traffic last Friday evening arriving at the Merchants Bank at the same intersection, the other side of Shelburne Road, and had also called PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 14, 1976 several bank managers. He said he recognized there is a difference between the two kinds of banks and would just repeat what Mr. Lamphere said. There is plemty of capacity and no problem for someone approaching from the south or west, plenty of capacity for someone coming down to make a left turn into Brewer Parkway. The only potential problem would be the capacity of Brewer Parkway and that doesn't seem to be a problem, as far as he could see. Mr. Lamphere referred again to Mr. Ward's memo, saying they would agree to maintain the hedges during construction; also item #5 requiring approval of the driveways is necessary because they need two curb cuts. Mr. Poger noted that the lights that control the entrance to Brewer Parkway also control the entrance to the shopping center, so traffic would have the same amount of time to enter for the bank as they would have for entering the shopping center. -r ,:�zcYcLc . y�N Mr. Page said the , v:: is about 11 secondg; `ls seconds in There might be the possibility of changing the signal. A car would have the same amount of green time as a car entering the center. There is no conflict with the capacity for making a left turn into Brewer Parkway, but in going out you would be contending with everybody coming out of K-Mart. There is a right turn on red allowed here. Mr. Ewing asked if there would be any problem about an entrance being only 50 feet from Shelburne Road. Mr. Lamphere explained that would be a direct entrance because they have space for at least 11 cars; the most that would be likely to be backed up would be two cars. Mr. Page felt at the busiest hour most of the customers would be corning from the north or straight across from.the shopping center; 75% from the north, 25% from the south. Mr. Poger said he recognized the Zoning Board's feeling that this area is commercial along Shelburne Road when they granted the use variance; he did not think it was unreasonable; but this is not a matter of rezoning by reaching into a residential neighborhood. But just as a general comment, he said he would like the Zoning Board to be as careful as they were here that in the future use variances are not encroaching into residential areas. Mr. Levesque said he thought they did a good job in utilizing this property, that it is very compatible. Mr. Poger said drive-in banks are one of the things talked about in Mr. Morency's high traffic research and he would think this one was not a particular problem. Mr. Morency agreed, saying it goes from a signalized intersection and the curb cut is not on Shelburne Road. Mr. Schuele brought up the matter of traffic on Saturday mornings at the Merchants Bank on White Street, saying cars were out into the street and even across both lanes of traffic. Mr. Ewing said this was the only bank open on Saturday morning and Mr. Pcgsr said the capacity of this Burlington Savings branch was much more than at the Merchants on White Street. Mr. Poger added that check cashing is more normally done at commercial banks than at savings banks. Mr. Levesque referred to a petition signed by several neighbors on Brewer Parkway expressing their appreciation for preserving the residential character of the neighborhood. PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER_ 14,__1926 Mr. Poger moved that the Planning Commission approve the Site Plan for Burlington Savings —Bank with the followi_g_stipnlationst 1T the curb cut on Shelburne Road is to be closed; 2) the plantings to be as outlineds sufficient bond be posted to cover the landscaping and the closing of the curb cut, and a bond,,_ if necessary, for the sidewalk and the curb. Seconded_by Mr. Woolery and voted unanimously for approval_ Ramada Inn, Williston Road -- continued Site Plan Review Mr. Gordon Woods said this was the proposed addition of 44 rooms to the back of the Ramada Inn. He indicated on the plan the proposed evergreen type of hedge, the plantings around the Aransformers and around the front of 5 clusters approximately 14 feet in diameter, 7 plantings in a cluster, These are to be of mugho pine. Reference was made to #3 in Mr. Page's memo of December 10th, and Mr. Samuelson said something should be able to be worked out on that. Kr. Poger said most traffic comes from the Interstate and Dorset Street and for that traffic flow it would make sense to have one way in and one way out. However, what percentage comes the other way from Williston Road and the more easterly direction, and what would make sense for a left turn. Mr. Page said about 20 to 30% entered from the east at the Holiday Inn. Mr. Poger asked, when signalization goes in, would it be the best place for both exit and entrance from the east, and would special provision be made for a left turn later at that point for cars coming from the east. Mr. Page said his thinking would be that for the interim right now it would be safer and more feasible for someone leaving the inn to get back to the Interstate to use the easterly curb cut. In the future there might be a signal there. The majority are right turns originating from the Inter- state and a smaller fraction from the east. Mr. Poger suggested making the easterly both exit and entrance and the more westerly for entrance only. Mr. Page said he didn't feel all that strongly about this. It could be by City adoption. Mr. Corologos said the traffic flow seems to be that way; they come in at the westerly and go out the easterly. Mr. Poger asked if it would make sense to ask for a sign at the appropriate place saying EXIT ONLY at the westerly, to make that clear. He indicated on the site plan what he meant. The cost of the landscaping was then discussed. Mr. Samuelson asked the Planning Commission to waive some of the requirement, saying they are putting in a great deal and doing all the planting they had been asked to do in front and putting in the hedge on the Mary Street side, and planting shrubs. He said they didn't know where to put any more. Mr. Page said he would concur with Mr. Ward's recommendation that the land- scaping be in the full amount. Mr. Poger suggested larger plantings in the areas they talked about, or putting in more additional plantings. Otherwise there is no problem. He noted the sewer easement is to be shown on the plan. Mr. Samuelson asked for more consideration from the Commission, asking where are they going to put in the other $1500 worth, just for the sake of planting -- where. It is a waste of money. If the Commission wishes them to plant, they will plant, but the requirement being made is unreasonable. The Commission, he said, has the authority in its own regulations to waive to what is reasonable. He indicated the proposed plantings on the drawing, saying they even went so far as to put some up around the barno and asked where else could they put $1500 more planting other than breaking up the asphalt. GEORGE & MARY LEr ORGE 966 Shelburne Iload PAUL LAYOU 960 Shelburne 1:oad Area is zoned R-4 District. Two parcelsinvolved to be combined, lot #1 72' x 128' (Lanou) - lot #r2 g0' x 128' (Deforge). Lanou's dwelling to be remodeled into a bank facility - existing; garage and breezeway to be removed. DelForge dwelling to be removed, land to be used for parking and circulation area. Lanou dwelling is non -conforming to dimensional requirements - front yard set back required 75 feet - existing 30 feet. :proposed use is allowed in BR _-istrict. Section 11.704 requires a set back of 65 feet with a buffer area of 15 feet, propose to construct drive-in facility to within <:'2 feet. BE District boundaries involved are: .1,1ason's, located opI)osite side of Brewer Parkway and continues northerly along Shelburne Road. Twitchell.'s located to south of Deforge property and continues southerly along Shelburne Road, ER District is a de_oth of 300 feet. ADMINISTRATIVE CHECKLIST PROJECT NP.PdE/FILE REFERENCE j,a'I.I— • —';W 1. LETTER OF NOTIFICATION & APPROVAL M4 Is ION OR FINDINGS & ORDER I 2. BONDING OR ESCROW AGREEMENTS a LAIIDSCAPING DRAIINLIGE :2W CURES S 1 D KS < (NOTE ALL RELEASES OR AGREEMENT REVISIONS) 3. LIST APPROVALS GRANTEDWITH DATES AND PERMITS GRANTED & SITE INSPECTIONS COMPLETED, ETC.: M- i z, 1AV14, 4+. UTILITY EASEMENTS *, BILLS OF SALE RECORDED ACCEPTED 5. CERTIFICATE OF TITLE x 6. ROAD:vAYS DEEDS FOR CITY STREETS ACCEPTED * PRIVATE ROAD & WAIVER AGREEMENT x 7. FINAL PLAT OR RECORD COPY — STAMPED.* SIGNED, & FILED OR RECORDED B. PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTS ACCEPTED & RECORDED FILED 9. MISCELINNEOUS AGREE-MENTS LATM FOR ROAD WIDENING OFFER OF IRREVOCABLE DEDICATION FUTURE ACCESS POINTS SHORED ACCESS POINTS OTHER LO. COPY OF SURVEY TO ASSESSOR (IF CHANGE IN PROPERTY LINES) 11. FEES — PAJD/DATE HE= cING II:SP. RE'CR. ATIGN (:;E.:O?D C _LC'JL:.TIONS 3 �D DEPOSIT 1711: ACCOUI T) 2. I:'?i.CT \IJT_O. JP LIi. " _f ?J ;T IG_: : SCHOOL :'IDS AR Cc tI - Ll 42:631 #10-A -77jFnM6L.--to L Iq pt�- -5 i� t4. 04 'W Wj1W, BURLINGTON SAVINGS BANK SOUTH BURLINGTON BRANCH BURLINGTON, VERMONT December 14,1976 SITE PLAN REVIEW 11.70 Site Plan Approval Pertaining to Adequacy of Traffic Access Circulation and Parking Landscaping and Screening 1. Site Plan by Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects. 2. Specifications and size of Plant Material shown on Landscape Plan. 3. Improvements Schedule April 1977 begin Construction Completion late summer 1977. 4. Estimated Cost - Landscaping $4,200.00 S. Performance Bond in the amount required to be presented to the City of South Burlington with Building Permit Application to assure performance of above work. 6. Memo dated December 7,1976 from Richard Ward, Zoning Administrator regarding Zoning Variance, City Ordinances. 7. Data required by Planning Committee; Size - 1400 sf. Parking Requirements for above uses- 7 spaces 10 spaces provided 8. Highway; a. Study for Connecticut Bank and Trust. Window capacity, each transaction 190 sec/window Cars per hour 19 per window (Total cars two windows = 38) b. Mosler Safe Co. 8 lane facility 21.8 Cars per window per hour c. Merchants Bank, Shelburne Road Amounts see attached memo BURLINGTON SAVINGS BANK SOUTH BURLINGTON BRANCH BURLINGTON, VERMONT SUMMARY 1. In capacity _ See attached Capacity Analysis. 2. Exit capacity 3. See Counts of Existing Conditions dated Friday, December 10,1976. 4. Peak hour traffic; a. Capacity of exit lane 98 cars. b. Existing exit lane 32 cars. c. Estimated peak hour 38 cars. 9. Soil Test; Existing bearing capacity in excess of 3000 psi. 10. Development Time Table - Start Construction April 1977 WIEMANN-LAMPHERE, ARCHITECTS 346 Shelburne Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 City of South Burlington 1175 WILLISTON ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 . �•'' TEL. 863-2891 December 7, 1976 Mr. George DeForge 966 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Mr. DeForge: Be advised that the request for a use variance by the Burlington Savings wank and yourself was granted approval by the Zoning board of Adjustment. The Board did stipulate that the bank is to perpetuate the hedge (screening) on the east side of the property which is now owned by the adjacent property owner. The Board finds that this area is commercial in nature, and this proposal will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Very truly, Richard t%'ard Zoning Administrative Officer R1j cc Paul Lanou Attorney John Ewing I I t 11 1 [2 L fia-CYO tAqtrl4 ---G CHITTENDEN LINTY REGIONMAL PLAN, I COMMISSION URBAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY is INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS = TOWN: cSov 63uA?z'_1 vG 7ot) INTERSECTION: DATA: APPROACH VEHICLE EXISTING CONDiTIQ;BALANCEDCODITdC} - Iv1OVEMENT G/C V/C Capocity (VPH) G/C V/C Capacity (VPH) /M 2 Z.IDo�o ! (S�vah 412.41 ' Q f 3 � q 4 PREVAILING CONDITIONS: Avy r G/C s docond3 gre8n (G)/ seconds in cycle (C) V/C= volume (v)/capacity (C) VPH = vshicle3 per hour TRAFFIC COUNT Brewer Parkway & Shelburne Road OUT IN North Straight South North Straight South December 9, 1976 7:20-8:00 a.m. 20 2 5 5 - 2 December 10, 1976 7:30-8:15 a.m. 16 1 4 6 1 December 10, 1976 4:00-5:30 a.m. 28 ;8 i 16 49 11 12 QwcrAr, - L.Au 05DOL- 514%\4 �Co 6A 7 tAvm"_, 'Zo AN ------ -- -- ---- wc.> p A_� 6mzrl w Ll_� 0, '�:u - P/N -- Qai;=�) k pookc n &eM CIA -4 5- t C44, - 4- No Text alk lea -------------------- Ole., Aol 42-0 00�2,s� e .Os I e—Ile Av ------------- ------------------------ RECEIVED LAW OFFICES OF EWING & SPOKES 86 ST. PAUL STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 JOHN T. EWING RICHARD A. SPOKES JOSEPH F. OBUCHOWSKI William J. Szymanski City Manager 1175 Williston Road S. Burlington, Vt. 05401 Dear Bill: November 12, 1976 { ,?V 12 1976 MANAGL R'S Orr 10E C!T" -DI_INGTON AREA CODE 802 863-2857 The Burlington Savings Bank recently applied for a use variance to construct a drive-in bank on Shelburne Road. John Ewing is handling this application for the bank and, thus, I thought it appropriate to clarify my relationship with John. On February 1, 1976, John became a full-time employee of the Burlington Savings Bank as Vice President and General Counsel. He no longer is associated with this office, although his name does appear on the letterhead. Although John was my predecessor as City Attorney and my law partner, he does not have anything to do with the legal affairs of the City. I simply wish to indicate by this letter involvement in the Burlington Savings Bank's solely as a representative of the Burlington Very truly yours, � ') Richard A. Spokes RAS : nm cc: Richard Myette, Chairman Zoning Board of Adjustment that John's application is Savings Bank. I November 1, 1976 Mr. Paul Lanou 960 Shelburne road South Burlington, Vt. 05401 Jear :.r. Lanou. Please be adviseca that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City :fall Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road on :-ionciay, NoveatLer 15, 1976 at 5.00 P.M. to consider the request of the Burlington Savings Bank which involves your property. If you have any questions on this, please don't hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer TW/h NOT ICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance, decision of administrative officer. Property Owner George A. and Mary Deforge Property location & description 966 Shelburne Road, South Burlington Residential - variance to Business (Drive -In Banking) a Variance of Section number title of section) Basis of appea I understand the regular meetings are held twice a month on Monday at 5:00 p.m. at the City Hall, Conference Room. The legal advertise- ment must appear in the Burlington Free Press a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing, I agree to pay a fee of 30.00 which fee is tD off -set the costs of advertising and the hearing. Hearing Date Signatur&�'- f Appellant $OUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 91, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South,`purlington City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Roar;, South Burlington, Vermont on .v •o4 , /f/o�*„„a-r. iy/ / 971 , at 5;,o , a+ to consider the day of week month and date) (time) following: Appeal o f �,i,C_ As,. -A %Jqtw y .0 �•,,f -+- .c'-� .f /��,.�-L p�...� •.. seeking .a �/QA�c,.�e.L , from Section L•Oo , /—�+-+�--t% '.�G G/-�-`e ` 3 vo ? - t.,.,/.,•.r..ws. �.o•c�-� of the South Burling ton Zoning F;egula- tions. Request is for permission to ��t 4-& -- A � � � • ��`"' "GJ ,d,... - A.- ��..,L 7.0 �.✓ •.ems Foe 4"� .•••c. /�'�-�• �. IC. �/M +�#-+�.a.,,,, s �i�� // / � 7�' ,/N ..,bra► � /Za �.O`a�l.e ��.e�'`' � / - "•'- �.•• •�-�.o�s.....� �✓ `""' .... .. «Zj s� A1001 .ter... a.,pe�+�.. M.:► /-------------- S S '00�ea,- X7_ :L_ NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTIENT I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance, decision of administrative officer. i� Property Owner Paul E. Lanou I Property location & description 960 Shelburne Road, Burlington, VT Residential - Request variance to Business (Drive -In Banking) a Variance of Section , (number (title of section) Basis of appeal I understand the regular meetings are held twice a month on Monday at 5:00 p.m. at the City Hall, Conference Room. The legal advertise- ment must appear in the Burlington free Press a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing, I agree to pay a fee of $30.00 which fee is to off -set the costs of advertising and the hearing. Hearing Date Signature of Appel nt SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 91, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South•"Eurlington City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on at to consider the day of week month and date) (time) following: Appeal of seeking -a , from Section , of the South Burlington Zoning Regula- tions. Request is for permission to of Tj.A 2 1 � � Y 1► I (, Nove:nLer 1, 1976 �U i4r. . George Jc:Forge 566 Shelburne Road South Lurlington, Vermont 05401 ;year Ar. Do -Forge: Please be advised that the South Burlington 'Zoning I jI board of i%.djustment will hold a public hearing at the City hall Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road on Monday, Ji4oveuber 15, 1376 at 5:OU P.A. to consider the request of the Burlington Savings Bank which involves your property. if you have any questions on this, please don't hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Richard ward Zoning Administrative Officer RW/h �i NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance, decision of administrative officer. Property Owner Property location & description Variance of Section Tn, umber title of section Basis of appeal I understand the regular meetings are held twice a month on Monday at 5:00 p.m. at the City Hall, Conference Room. The legal advertise- ment must appear in the Burlington Free Press a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing, I agree to pay a fee of $30.00 which fee is to off -set the costs of advertising and the hearing. Hearing Date Signature of Appellant SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 91, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on at to consider the day of week month and date) Mime following: ram' Appeal a Ae (4f seeking r a �/?a..G -, from Section�� .,.r of the South Burlington Zoning Regula- tions. Request is for permission to ..,�a<.� ��"� �'�`"`'• mod. '� .r.ePPt. A.,.�.s1* �,,�...�",;, °a U7, n tcll. Lanou: (,�4ol lc'76 -cvised ti-,r, '-cutll uj-].in;Ttcn, -cn!n.. ca—: 0 m: 4. cu--h L I h o 10 ul ic hearin�� u r. n,,.,,, t c n ity 1, Con'nrence 11711 '.�'illiston 7,oad' c, n onda� T) 'k,7" a ecer,l"r 6, "', ) .:CC .r�,. to consi,,irr your reouost for a I - -) r,onin va"ianee. __j-��n tr in very tri,,Iy, arcs onin, '.(I'ministrativc C)-F""icer November 22, 1Q6 zr. coorzo 7o"o1ze 965 helhurne 7on7 Auth :Wington, 71 05401 A= jx. A%rge: A AvIsed that the A,ut'ci ' vx,_;Lnto wning Foard c " Ojust- ment M! UK a public hearin, at the wuth Durlin-ton ity null, KnTerence . oon, 1175 Alliston :cad an 7cnGaj, �cnzVer 6, 1976 at 5:00 p.":":. to consider your rQquest Car a roninE variance. FInaso plan to be in attendance. ler, truly , R.ichard YI&J, .cninE .0ministrative Kficer --O:/j I le 4�4 ljxLA - , " I ID 0 J�A L-Oe4l. A51;,;,.M f r-1A A. - e-o 0'7 , 4 � 4 ;6L,,2,,,4s & 14 -fD � I im I& M &-%;Pf�f4 . --. I o4 -rAmr� 1.6 "IT L WA 1 �) : R.W-W-'A _7Z t- -5t jPP--V -r 4-4 IVO y 4 AUII&4 \V, zoop WIEMANN - LAMPHEPE. ARCHn=TS 349 MUZALME to-r. tLjf4Q7j^ IDUF VT, W'f 4ft- Z4" MkL-77 i/2... 1 +_ n f.� '�`4- i Q) x I �? rt��rE✓ 1..- @- t Coy i t^Av+NL� / { I 4Z214. "I L P+9� !tiL �QurPNtstir t?Y Mnst.S:R Gn./ ttE4r5 Ce � : �,i 7626 ADDENDUM NO. I ADDENDUM 1-1 The Drawings and Contract Documents prepared by Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects, 346 Shelburne Street, Burlington, Vermont for construction of SOUTH BURLINGTON BRANCH BURLINGTON SAVINGS BANK SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT are by this Addendum amended as described herein. The complete Addendum shall be included in the Contract Documents. A. SPECIFICATIONS 1. Section 1C, Special Conditions - Page 1C-2, Item 06. Clerk of Works: The Clerk of the Works for the project is Mr. H. E. Warner. He or his successor shall be the authorized re- presentative of the Architect, with the same privileges as the Architect (but without taking away from the Architect's respons- ibility) and shall, through the Architect, represent the Owner during construction and until final payment. 2. Section 1D, Allowances - Page 1D-1, Item 04, 2. Revise stone allowance to $6.00 per ton delivered to the site. 3. Section 2A, Site Clearing and Preparation, Page 2A-1, Article 04. Removal Items. Delete and revise as follows: The Contractor shall remove existing foundation and garage floor slabs to below grade and fill existing foundation as required. All found- ation and floor slabs below new structure shall be completely removed and properly disposed of on site or removed from the site to Landfill Area in City of South Burlington. 4. Section 4A, Mortar and Grouts - Page 4A-1; .03 Quality of Materials Add to Item d: All mortar for stone work shall be colored with color additive recommended for this purpose• Color to be selected by Architect. 5. Section 7A, Insulation - Page 7A-1; Article .04. Item b, Perimeter Insulation: All perimeter insulation specified shall be for the following locations: On four sides of foundation for Mini -Lobby and below floor slab of Mini -Lobby. 7626 ADDENDUM 1-2 B. DRAWINGS: 1. Drawing No. 2, Main Floor Plan Room Finish Schedule - Carpet referred to for floor finish shall be by Owner. 2. Drawing No. 3, Basement Foundation Plan Section 5/3 is located at rear entrance. 3. Drawing No. 5, Elevations Textured finish for walls noted on Section DD shall be "Dryvil" on galvanized diamond mesh wire lathe installed as recommended by manufacturer. Ceiling shall be finished with three coats.of house paint - Acrylic Latex. 4. Drawing No. A-1 and A-2, dated March 31, 1977 attached to this Addendum. END OF ADDENDUM NO. I March 31, 1977 WIEMANN-LAMPHERE, ARCHITECTS 346 SHELBURNE STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 )CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON ) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NAME OF OWNER Burlington Savings Bank TEL.# 658-1810 ADDRESS 148 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 NAME OF DEVELOPER Burlington Savings Bank TEL.# 658-1810 ADDRESS 148 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 LOCATION OF PROPOSED SITE 964 & 966 Shelburne Road. So. Burl. VT ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS NAME Twitchel l' s Store Mrs. Edwin Farnham ADDRESS 974 Shelburne Road, So. Burl. VT 1 Brewer Parkway, So. Burl. VT SITE IMPROVEMLNTS MUST BE DETAILED ON PLAN, BELOW LIST ESTIMATED COST OF: STORM DRAINAGE WORK $ 2,400.00 ENTRANCE & EXIT IMMPROVEMENTS $ son on LANDSCAPING COST $ 4,2nn_nn UTILITIES (SEWER — WATER) $ 7�2nn_nn TOTAL COST OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS $ i g- son nn ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST. $ 12S,00n_ nn COMPLETION DATE OF SITE IMPF.OVEKENTS MONTH DAY YEAR SOILS CONDITIONS MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4 FEET (ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE REQUESTED BY IDMINISTRATIVE OFFICER) NOTE: APPLICATION AND SITE PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO MEETING DATE. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Burlington Savings Bank and Blair Estate Date: December 10, 1976 Re: Burlington Savings Bank Shelburne Road 1. Sidewalk shall be 5' in width, constructed one foot from property line. 2. A connection drive to the southerly business area would be beneficial for internal circulation. A sidewalk along this drive would better serve the establishment. 3. A sidewalk from Brewer Parkway would accommodate pedestrians from that area. Re: Blair Estate Dorset Street 1. Joint use of driveways must be clearly defined in the lot sales agreements. Respectfully submitted, William J. Sz manski, City Manager MEMORANDUM TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: RICHARD WARD, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR RE: PRE -HEARING COM4ENTS ON SITE PLANS AND SKETCH PLAN APPLICATIONS DATE: DECEMBER 9, 1976 BaLINGTON SAVINGS BANK, 960-966 Shelburne Road 1) Recommend the installation of a curb on the north side of Brewer Parkway, same as being proposed for the south side (City should participate during construction of this facility). , 2) Existing curb cut on Shelburne Road to be closed, bonding required. 3) Precautions should be taken during construction to protect existing vegetation. 4) Proposed landscaping is in conformance, bonding required �4,200. 5) Driveways as proposed require Planning Commission approval under Section 11.703 of the zoning regulations. BLAIR FARM SUBDIVISION, Dr. Marshall McBean, Dorset Street 1) Area in question zoned A-R District, proposed lots are in total conformance with zoning regulations. 2) All proposed lots are effected by drainageways (C. 0. District) minimum set back required at 50 feet. 3) Existing Blair house is non -conforming to dimensional requirements, will effect any proposed alterations or remodeling. 4) The locating of the property line between lot 71 and #2 may also create a non -conforming structure (i.e. the horse barn) minimum side yard required 75 feet. 5) Proposed culvert for lots 2, 3, and 4 will require review and approval by the City Engineer. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Burlington Savings Bank and Blair Estate Date: December 10, 1976 Re: Burlington Savings Bank Shelburne Road 1. Sidewalk shall be 5' in width, constructed one foot from property line. 2. A connection drive to the southerly business area would be beneficial for internal circulation. A sidewalk along this drive would better serve the establishment. 3. A sidewalk from Brewer Parkway would accommodate pedestrians from that area. Re: Blair Estate Dorset Street 1. Joint use of driveways must be clearly defined in the lot sales agreements. Respectfully submitted, dtaw �-/- William J. Sz manski, City Manager {J ; 2 2, access - in view of the amount of frontage and density of development, 3 curb cuts .are not at all excessive. A 60' ROW should be reserved for a future access road which goes north -south and bisects the property. The Commission should request the applicant to make a commitment to deeding the 60' ROW on the south property line to the City, at such time as the City plans to construct a road there. 3. miscellany - applicant should work closely with the Soil Conservation Service on design and layout of septic systems and water supplies, due to wetlands and recharge areas on site; the Commission may wish to place some restrictions on siting of septic systems, wells, and houses in accord with the Soil Conservation Service recommendations. - utilities should be underground to all housesites on the ridge unless costs are prohibitive. Deslauriers Tennis Facility, Dorset Street - no further comments. Burlington Savings Bank, Shelburne Road 1. Use - authorized by ZBA variance 12/6/76, with the stipulation tVat the hedge on the east property line be "perpetuated and maintained" by the applicant. A petition of 14 Brewer Parkway residents was presented in support of the proposal. 2. Refer to memos from Dick Ward and William Szymanski, also see enclosed map. 3..Access - no curb cut is proposed on Shelburne Road; customers will enter and exit via a signallized intersection and Brewer Parkway. The applicant should furnish information on peak hour traffic generation, in relation to the existing capacity of the intersection (Brewer Parkway x Shelburne Road); also, the alignment of the exit on Brewer Parkway should be discussed. Ramada Inn I recommend this site plan be approved with the following stipulations: 1. access to Sunoco is to remain unchanged. 2. the sewer easement around the building should be shown on the detailed plans. 3. the westerly curb cut should be one way in and clearly marked as such; the easterly curb cut to be one way out and similarly marked. (should improve left turn exiting movements, partic- ularly if a signal is installed.) 4. landscaping be installed in the full required amount to include flowering shrubs in the front yard. 5. the strip of land fronting on Mary Street, will not be used for access purposes, unless both land use and zoning change in the J1:ary Street neighborhood. LAUJI -A A Ll�,� , �:� 6,41 ov, 4 ob niQ 6c� O(YeA, u TO: The South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment ,7� The undersigned have reviewed plans prepared by James A. Lamphere, architect, for a branch banking facility of the Burlington Savings Bank on properties presently owned by George and Mary DeForge and Paul and Margaret Lanou, being 960 Shelburne Road and 966 Shelburne Road. Considering possible uses that could occur on these properties and also considering the lack of control inherent in a zone change, the under- signed hereby support the application of these property owners and the Burlington Savings Bank for a variance for this branch bank facility, as being generally consistent with the neighborhood character of Brewer Parkway. r �• .% c�.L t r`�� o lguee� 1 L ( t TO: The South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment The undersigned have reviewed plans prepared by James A. Lamphere, architect, for a branch banking facility of the Burlington Savings Bank on properties presently owned by George and Mary DeForge and Paul and Margaret Lanou, being 960 Shelburne Road and 966 Shelburne Road. Considering possible uses that could occur on these properties and also considering the lack of control inherent in a zone change, the under- signed hereby support the application of these property owners and the Burlington Savings Bank for a variance for this branch bank facility, as being generally consistent with the neighborhood character of Brewer Parkway. 174 n 0 T "1 ( LO G?LJT-- I -.;,- 5) Z?2 �� plc_. Lc�t.-� ti-i—T' •--� -S7 �4 cz g- �41c" 09 339 �F F- _77z I afITTENDEN COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION URBAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS TOWN: 59u-tP INTERSECTION: 151-1 (U-5- DATE: TaLY /f X APPROACH VEHICLE MOVEMENT EXISTING CONDITION I BALANCED CONDITION G/C V/C C0PGcitY(VPH) G/C V/C ls4 - zP-2 'P4 21j& -4L"W, PREVAILING CONDITIONS: G/C wseconds green (G)/seconds in cycle (C) WC a volume (V) /capacity (C) VPH a vehicles per hour � _ki. -f EAK HNR,- No Text 75-) Lk' LWA 0 W-k -TC77AL- -5 -71 4 1p- �� r CV- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF APPLICATION READINESS This is to certify that has submitted a complete applic ti n to the South Burlington Planning Commission on /`ti- �(, for the purpose of ,z T��,�,ti4_ —A The Zoning Administrator finds that the applicant has filed all applicable submissions and is in conformance with the city's zoning regulations. s/ Zoning Administrator Date The applicant wa granted a Zoning Board of Adjustment variance on _ / ?iG/ 7/ cfsee attached memo 'r l� The Planning Assistant finds the application is in con- formance with the master plan and that it answers all questions raised by the review roces / / 7� Planning Assistant Date Ot-ee attached memo The Fire Chief certifies that this application does not adversely affect the fire department's ability to protect life and property in the city or at this site or create a need for additional personnel, programs or equipment. Fire Chief Date LO See attached memo The School Directors certify that the proposed project (to be specifically named) will/will not place an unreasonable burden on the ability of this municipality to provide educational services. If a negative response is given, information will be provided to explain the Board's decision. Chairman Date C]See attached memo PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF APPLICATION READINESS Page 2 The Police Chief certifies that this application does not adversely affect the Police Department's ability to protect life and property in the city or at this site or create a need for additional personnel, programs, or equipment. s/ Police Chief Date CDSee attached memo The undersigned City Engineer certifies that this applica- tion is in conformance with the city's transportation plan, represents sound engineering practice and will not create an unsafe traffic c nditio y bngrn (wee attached memo Date The Planning Assistant certifies that this application raises no legal questions that he can foresee, or if it does that they have been answered by the City Attorney in the attached opinion. Planning A-ssistan C7See attached memo e The City Engineer certifies that the application is in conformance with city engineering standards and represents sound engineering practice as shown. s/ City Engineer Date C7 See attached memo This completed certificate shall be submitted to the Planning Commission Chairman rior to the applicant's being placed on the agenda of a regu ar y scheduled meeting. This certificate is required for site plan review, sketch plans, preliminary plats, final plats and right-of-way approvals. The Chairman shall determine with the advice of the Planning Assistant if any of the above signatures are not necessary, however, it is assumed that all apply. December 7, 1976 %r. George FIeForge 966 Shelburne 1,oad Sou'). urlinzton, VT U5401 !:eI,r ''.r. ^eeorge: F-c advised thf.t the request for a use variance by the IurlinEton Savings Tank an6 yourself was granted approval by the Zoning 77oarc of. .'.d justrnent. Th:: �-,oard did st,'_ ri-,]Late th=_ t the bark is to perpetuate the hedge (scrr _-nine) on the east side of t1_e property %,hich is no,,, o, n,::' ny ih ae j anent property own?r. . ^'t .. 0ard finds that this 3r-a is commercial in nature? and this proposal vil7. rat; .1tvr 4' V^ry tri:,Iy, iichard .'ard Zoning t,dr-inistrettive Officer a'/ j CC t &Ul T,ancu fIttorney John yawing / SOUTH )RLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF _ .7JUMENT Findings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located;Ill.'' (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; ,M-1 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant;. (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and ��... (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # �� Date Ap SOUTH )RLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF AJUSTMEENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b3- the provisions of the zoning regulations in e neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoni "regulations and that the authorization of a variance is there re necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnece aryl hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently i air the annropriate use or development of adjacent p perty, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zor_ing regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date Appellant Vote: Yes No Sign Li 1. 2. 3.-" SOUTH )RLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF JJUSTIENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions geAerally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in -the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; rl (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; El (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent perty, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # -� Date � Appellant Vote: Yes No List findings below: )S R4)v1< 7-6 6» Sign �1 SOUTH )RLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF . JJUM ENT Findings in accordance with Section 446F of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; Ll (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 1 1 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0 ( 5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. a Appeal # Date / Appellant Vote: List find 1. 2. 3. SOUTH )RLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF )JUMENT Findings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 121 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 0 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to ti-le public welfare; and 0— That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date Appellant JAa. J'- Vote: Yes F� No 13 List findings below: 1. 2. 3. Appeal # Sign t.