Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 0974 0984 Shelburne Road
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 1 OCTOBER 2002 PAGE 5 Mr. Belair said staff has no issues with the plan. It does, however, need some notes added. Mr. Boucher moved to approve preliminary plat #SD-02-63 and Final Plat #SD-02- 64 of Lewis Family Limited Partnership and the City of South Burlington, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion of 1 October 2002. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 11. Public Hearing: Application #CU-02-19 of Joe & Charles Handy seeking conditional use approval under Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The request is for permission to construct an 80 sq. ft. accessory structure for storage at a convenience store located at 974 Shelburne Road: and 12. Site plan application #SP-02-42 of Joe & Charles Handy to amend a previously approved plan for a 3075 sq. ft. convenience store. The amendment consists of the permission to construct an 80 sq. ft. accessory structure for storage at a convenience store located a 974 Shelburne Road: Ms. Handy said they just acquired the liquor store and want to store bottles in the proposed shed. They have to accept the returned bottles by law. Mr. Belair noted the building was built without approval because of misinformation given to the applicant by the office which thought this was a residential property. The shed will have to be moved to meet the setback requirement. It will use up 2 parking spaces. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Site Plan and Conditional Use application #SP-02- 42 and CU-02-19 of Joe and Charles Handy subject to the stipulations in the draft motion of 1 October 2002 amended to add stipulation 45 as follows: Pursuant to Section 26.256b of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, the Board approves 17 parking spaces which is a shortfall of 6 spaces or 26%. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 13. Sketch plan application 4SD-02-58 of Jeffrey and Elisabeth Goldberg to subdivide a 12.95 acre parcel into five lots of 2.17 acres (lot #1), 2.51 acres (lot #2), 1.73 acres (lot #3), 1.92 acres (lot #4) and 4.55 acres (lot #5), 1760 Dorset St: Mr. Murray summarized a letter he had sent to Ms. Hoover which the Board did not receive. CITY OF SOUTH BURLIN GTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 16, 2002 Joe Handy 75 South Winooski Avenue Burlington, VT 04501 Re: Site plan and conditional use applications #SP-02-42 and #CU-02-19 of Joe and Charles Handy Dear Mr. Handy: Please find enclosed the Findings of Fact and Decision of the Development Review Board approval on October 1, 2002 in regards to the above referenced project. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement to obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months, or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Stephanie A. Smith Associate Planner 10/1/02, MOTION OF APPROVAL JOE AND CHARLES HANDY, SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE, 974 SHELBURNE ROAD I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve site plan and conditional use applications #SP-02-42 and #CU-02-19 of Joe and Charles Handy to amend a previously approved plan for a 3075 square foot convenience store. The amendment consists of constructing an 80 square foot accessory structure for storage at a convenience store located at 974 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a plan entitled "New 10' x 8' WD. Shed at Existing Simon's Store", prepared by Gordon G. Woods Assoc., dated Aug. 2002, with a last revised date of 8/7/02, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months, pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 3) The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative officer prior to the use of the new shed. 4) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. llry-000,tt 1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO October 1, 2002 MEETING Traffic: This property is located in Traffic Overlay District Zone 2 which allows this property to generate a maximum of 107.7 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. The applicant is proposing a 4,050 square foot addition. ITE estimates that the current facility generates 75.8 vte's during the PM peak hour. The addition will increase the vte's to 90.13, representing an increase of 14.33 vte's. The applicant should be prepared to pay the anticipated road impact fee based on these calculations. Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District: A portion of the property is located within the Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District. The applicant provided a report addressing the effects of the increased impervious surface (enclosed for your review). Lighting:, The applicant proposes pole mounted fixtures for the auto sales lot. The mounting heights vary but do not exceed 30 feet. Enclosed are cut sheets and a letter from Jeremy Matosky concerning the proposed light fixtures for your review. Dumpsters: A screened dumpster storage area is provided. A1 AND 131 JOE AND CHARLES HANDY, CONDITIONAL USE AND SITE PLAN, 974 SHELBURNE ROAD This project consists of amending a previously approved plan for a 3075 square foot convenience store, with gas sales. The amendment consists of the permission to construct an 80 square foot accessory structure for storage for the convenience store. The property located at 974 Shelburne Road lies within the Commercial 1 District. It is bounded on the north by a commercial property and Brewer Parkway, to the west by Shelburne Road, to the south by another commercial property, and to the east by residential properties. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA: The proposed project complies with the stated purpose of the Commercial 1 District "to encourage the location of general retail and office uses in a manner that serves as or enhances a compact central business area..." and does not adversely affect: a) the capacity of existing or planned community facilities - no effect expected b) the character of the area affected - no adverse effect is expected c) traffic on roads or highways in the vicinity —the proposed use is not expected to affect traffic. d) bylaws in effect- the proposal is in conformance with the zoning regulations e) utilization of renewable energy resources- there is no utilization of renewable energy resources to be affected. f j general public health and welfare - no adverse effect expected. SITE PLAN CRITERIA: 14 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO October 1, 2002 MEETING The only issue affecting this application is setback, parking, and coverage. Setbacks: The applicant is proposing an 8x10 foot shed, 65 feet from the residential zoning district boundary line, which meets the required setback under Section 25.108. Coverage_ Building coverage increases from 6.4% to 6.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage remains unchanged at 56% (maximum allowed is 70%). The front yard coverage remains unchanged at 66.9%. Parking: The proposed location of the shed is located within two existing parking spaces. The parking requirement is 23 spaces. Previously approved was 19 spaces, with a waiver of 4 spaces or 17%. The applicant requests a total parking waiver of 26% or 6 parking spaces. 14) JEFFERY & ELIZABET11 GOLDBERG, SKETCH PLAN, 232 AUTUMN HILL ROAD This project consists of subdividing a 12.95 acre parcel into five (5) lots of 2.17 acres (lot #1), 2.51 acres (lot #2), 1.73 acres (lot # 3),1.92 acres (lot #4), and 4.55 acres (lot #5). The project was approved by the DRB on December 5, 2000 (minutes enclosed). The reason for this application is because the 12/00 approval was denied by the Environmental Court on appeal. The Court found that the Board could not waive Section 26.202 (b) of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, which limit the number of single family residential units to 3 on a private roadway. This property located at 232 Autumn Hill Road lies within the SEQ District. It is bounded on the north, south, and east by residences and on the west by Dorset Street. Access: Proposed access to this property is provided by a 40 foot private r.o.w. running east - west through the center of the property and serves four (4),of which three (3) are developable, of the five (5) lots. An existing private r.o.w to north (Autumn Hill Road) currently serves the lot #1(with an existing residence) and three other existing residences. The applicant would agree to a condition that were Autumn Hill Road to become a public street, the new access road would be abandoned in favor of Autumn Hill Road. Lot size/frontaae: The minimum lot size requirement of 12,000 square feet and the minimum frontage requirement of 100 feet are met. C.O. District: A portion of the property is located within the C.O. District created by the minor stream running north - south through the property. This stream is delineated on the plans. The 4/12/77 approved plat shows a non -buildable area that extends 100 feet either side of the minor stream. This area should be shown on the plans as non -buildable. Non -buildable area: No development or portions. of lots are proposed in the non -buildable area. The entire non -buildable area is proposed to be an open space lot. The 4/12/77 15 FUELiC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington :'.. Development. Review Board .vial hold a public hearing at the South Bur- lington City Hall, Confer- ence room„ 575 Dorset Street. South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesdayy October 1, 2002. at 7.6 P.M. to consider the fol- lowing: 1. Final plat appli- cation #SD42-62 of Chase Properties 8 De- velopment, LTD to cons- truct a 20,300 sq. ft ge- neral office building, 46 Bowdcin Street. 2- Final plate appli- cation #SD-02-59 of Farwater, LTD to amend a. previously approved planned unit develop- ment consisting of 85 residential units in four (4) buildings and 88 units of congregate housing in two (2) buildings, The amendment consists of: 1) relocating and . reduc- ing in size the pod struc- ture at 325 Lime Kiln Road, and - 2) deleting the breezeway pool connec- tion at 327 Lime Kiln Road. 3- AppIIcatIo.n #CU-02-21 of Pat & Te- rese Maslack Ayer seek- I ing conditional use ap- proval under • Section 26.05, Conditional -Uses, of . the. South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permis- sion to amend a previ- ously approved plan for a 9868 sq. ft. mixed use building consisting of auto repair and service use and automobile ren- tal The amendment consists of expanding the building by 1712 sq. ft. for a total of 11,580 sq. ft, 4 Berard Drive. 4. Preliminary plat` application #SD-02-63 and final plat application. #SD- 02-63 and final plat application #SD-02-64 of Lewis Family Limited. ; Partnership and City of South Burlington to amend a 29,160 sq. ft. auto sales and service commercial complex.. The amendment cons- ists of establishing a planned unit develop- ment for the properties owned " by the applicants and: 1) construct a 4050 sq.tt. addition to an existing auto sales and service building, and 2) expansion of the parking area, 1301-1325 Shel- burne Road and 3 Holmes Road. 5. Application #CU-02-19 of Joe 8 Charles Handy seeking conditional use approval under Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to cons- truct at 80 sq. ft. acces- sory structure for sto- rage at a convenience t store located at 974 Shelburne Road. 6. Final plat app - cation #SD-02-61 /of ' Ironwood Real Estate, LLC to amend a previ- ously approved 'planned residential development consisting of 295 resi- dential units and an 18 hole golf course. The amendment consists of'' revising the building . loca- tions of the 18 two (2) ` family dwellings located on Fairview Derive. Copies of the applica- tions are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinklage, Clhairman South Burlington Deve- lopment Review Board September 14, 2002 MOOCL W. )WU14-A-4b0-SMWJ-F Al, 0,1 Acow `qoXAFY.k HALIW """" 79& NA[ LENI rood Llctlilwl' A' 11" "1 lS'Y - COALa TO it, A k-. MdPrLN-T. (b 13IL P Ti 'C, Q. e c 74D Tv C Y 14 A OCO$1C504 6e p a e a e GS NI C. It el T 01 J� 4V4 rOW L 14 H r P 0 i. e 51IM-C Y4" i L o C A T 1 0 J M A P ca 6 T , I-' I - za yr,7r L. W i V7 N o 440A ss F'C. imm 4- P�4 r—I I'A 4=1 t—f 0 1-4 Q <4 Un �M' J C-. 7-'2-,rl Nrtj'Mv� I. OL4014s, Is. ;-r , , C, !T'Y- 0 F S 0, TU-TH BTUFFLENGTON ZONING DEF-,� 13T MIETINT-01F PLA1\TI'1,TE-\TG �Z 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURI �iGTOPJ, VERMONT 05408 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Pen -nit Number SP- APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW - q2- All irdor-mation requested on this application -must be completed in M. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan -.Al result in your application being rejected and a delay in the re�Aew before the Development Review Board. 1) 0WINITER OF RECORD (Naine as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fay- 9) 96 Z - 9,559 MOUN I Ad A-[ 4 A Mov. 75- JZ) IV ZH Wzgac-�I<t O,r- , !30&JR 6-7 &V - 2) LOCATION OF LkST RECORDED DEED (Book and page 4) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fay. # --- *4 lte;'Cl Y 6 M ) J4 �- ly ieu, V z:,!�Te-lc I ,j Ruj?j 1 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name. mailing address, phone and fax 4) 96Z- Tv 5,0111*4 65Lf-("( 5" PROJE('7 STREET ADDRESS: 7LI 514 6) TAX PARCEL TD, 4 "can be obtained at Assessor's Office). 7) FROjECT DESCRIPTION a) F-� stinng Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) ndy ---fJ4 Cb lnloril A// 14 0,V&/51 le), 5 1 z C-- 19gb V:4 4VIM 4it b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain)_ 7,0 �rev- c- � fie, c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain)_ P.6�05YM6-) 1. re rh L `-I d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) &I`7C-f,7Ckr efi-r- Jed. Edo tz A4i- Pw1Lwi,4qS el N-amber of residential units (,if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) -Vez.4po IcAl4t-c-- 1 1. Number of ernrloyees ok company VehiCleS (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) 1 �i Comer (ilSt any other ;1��a�T�7ci2?5��3 ver"'�e�:t o this application not specif-caily requested above, 7cleasd note if CsJer ay D71'st-icts are applicable): 3) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: E sting % Proposed G. 10 % b) Overall (building, par -king, outside storage, etc) r.Tistinp 5Proposed 5,1, % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed % 9) COST ESTWATES a.) Bu,-dding (including interior renovations): � b) Landscaping: S c) Other site improvements (piease list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a.) A�-,,erage daily tra��c for entire property (in and out): 'o) A.TV. Pya� hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M Peak hour for entire property (I and out): 11) PE - AK- HOME OF 0PER--- T10IN: 1!) PEAK DAYS OF OPERA71ON: 13) ESTLAATED PROJECT COMPLETICN DATE. 14) SATE PLAIN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. rive (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" v 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A ,site plan application fee shall be paid to the C*, at the e of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. , Do not write below this line DATE OF SUB \/IIS aION: REVIEW ACTT' ORMf: 'Z Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: , l Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Zoning or Designee 9 IUz CITY OF SOUTH BURLIINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 ' f , c, Permit Number CJ� -�- t l All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the reauested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. 1 agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Type of application check one: ( ) Appeal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation) ("equest for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( ) Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING? 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) A40IM I -A RA I—//?N 0L/ k111./,0[.-4ilu 4 ✓C_ 43(11,-Zi f✓r rr9,;i _ ✓7' 6I-1%cf) l M.1-el"7V4 1-1AV1f)I, 47 /` H1117//7r Za,"Al^2i-rXf-1 A^I-I-A3I Alf/.! -'X3Xn I= N/7li17-C 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 4JOC-AJA2u, 41'i-r/4�&,v5 1-�ia��l LX1 `7.- fi)G/ tJ4 4tei AEG'. vi exl—lal 4) r (Name, mailing and fax #) 54-7- 11,1 WiNv!!�Sk / At A 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 05A >� -S61V rH &A?K relij Vy vj. y 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) ZbAlUL IC-plCc= STo0 g 3 v A- 5, ," / 5 4W S J, A4 4; A% 6W Wee, ii Sal eg 8G 5 , F, (&X l d c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) L0 d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) 44L6'V C /W-0 /L/& ,095, MC 14 A e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) A0% r /4PPL/CA'?L,9 f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing �:-f % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing "(I % Yroposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed % (does not apply to residential uses) 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping: c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14) LIST ABUTTERS ( List names and addresses of all abutting property owners on a separate sheet of paper). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge ('a/z SIGN TUBEAWLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPER AWN —ER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: " l 0-2-- REVIEW AUTHORIT Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of PlahpAig &—Zoning or Designee d CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZOl E-;G 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLIIVGT0N, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December ii, zooi Joe Handy 75 S. Winooski Avenue Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Liquor Agency at 974 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Handy: Please be advised that the placement of a liquor agency at 974 Shelburne Road is an allowed use in the zoning district where this property is located. This property is approved as a convenience store and the placement of a liquor agency in this store would not constitute a change in use. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me. S inc ,ply, R/ymond J. Belair Administrative Officer State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD Joe Handy Handy Family Trust 75 South Winoski Ave Burlington, Vermont 05401 RE: Petroleum Contamination at Simon's South Burlington, Vermont SMS Site # 99-2719 Dear Handy: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Waste Management Division 103 South Main Street/West Office Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0404 (802)241-3888 FAX (802) 241-3296 January 24, 2000 The Sites Management Section (SMS) has received the Underground Storage Tank (UST) closure report which outlines the subsurface conditions for the above referenced site. The fieldwork was conducted by Kelley Consulting on November 4, 1999. The report is dated November 8, 1999 and summarizes the degree and extent of contamination encountered.. The USTs removed include: UST #1 - 8,000 gallon gasoline UST , piping UST #2 - 8,000 gallon gasoline UST , piping UST #3 - 8,000 gallon gasoline UST , piping During the site activities, screened soils had concentrations up to 1320 parts per million (ppm) as measured by a photoionization detector (PID). The peak PID readings were measured at depths of 3 feet below ground surface (fbgs) in the excavation. The limits of soil contamination were not defined. All soil was used for backfill at the conclusion of the UST removal program. Site soils consisted of peastone. Groundwater was not encountered at a (maximum) depth of approximately 3 fbgs. The Simon's was not reported to have been inspected for sensitive receptors. The possible receptors potentially affected include groundwater, basements of adjacent buildings, nearby surface water, and public or private drinking water wells. Based on the report information, the SMS has 'determined additional work is necessary to determine the severity of contamination. Due to possible contamination to nearby receptors, the SMS requests that Handy Family Trust retain the services of a qualified environmental consultant to perform the following: ❑ Further define the degree and extent of contamination to the soil. ❑ If appropriate, determine if the airspace beneath the site and site adjacent building(s) (e.g. basements) has been impacted by the release using a PID. Wall and floor construction and susceptibility to vapor migration should be noted. PID measurements should be made in cracks and/or joints likely impacted. If the airspace has been impacted, SMS requests confirmatory sampling and laboratory analyses be performed using EPA Method TO-2. ❑ Determine the degree and extent of contamination, if any, to groundwater. A sufficient number of monitoring sites should be installed to adequately define the severity of site contamination. Analyze groundwater samples for MTBE, BTEX and TPH. At sites proximal to water supply sources, determine Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury the hydrologic relationship of the contaminated area to the water supply source. Pumping influences should be considered in the evaluation. ❑ Assess the potential for contaminant impact on sensitive receptors. Base this update on all available information and include basements of adjacent buildings, nearby surface water, any proximal drinking water sources, wetlands, sensitive ecologic areas, outdoor or indoor air, sewers, or utility corridors. Sample and analyze any at -risk water supplies for MTBE, BTEX and TPH compounds. ❑ Determine the need for long-term treatment and/or monitoring that addresses groundwater contamination. ❑ Submit a summary report that outlines the work performed, as well as provides conclusions and recommendations. As appropriate include analytical data; a site map showing the location of any potential sensitive receptors, stockpiled soils and monitoring or sample locations; an area map; detailed well logs; and a groundwater contour map. ❑ With the Workplan or Expressway form, please submit a site location map at an approximate scale of 1:24000 showing the location of the site. Please include a scale, a north arrow, the SMS site number, and a citation of the source map. The purpose of this map is to enable the SMS to enter the site location into a Geographical Information Systems database. Please have your consultant submit a preliminary work plan and cost estimate or a site investigation expressway notification form within fifteen days of your receipt of this letter, so it may be approved prior to the initiation of onsite work. Enclosed please find a list of consultants who perform this type of work as well as the brochure "Selecting Your UST Cleanup Contractor, " which will help you in choosing an environmental consultant. Based on current information, the underground storage tanks at Simon's are eligible for participation in the Petroleum Cleanup Fund (PCF). You must provide written proof to the SMS that you hold no other applicable insurance in order to receive reimbursement from the PCF. The owner or permittee must pay for the removal and/or repair of the failed tank(s), and for the initial $10,000.00 of the cleanup. The fund will reimburse the tank owner or permittee for additional eligible cleanup costs of up to $1 million. All expenditures must be pre -approved by the Agency or performed in accordance with the "Site Investigation Guidance" expressway program. Please refer to the enclosed guidance document titled, "Procedures for Reimbursement from the Petroleum Cleanup Fund" for additional information concerning the PCF. The Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources reserves the right to seek cost recovery of fund monies spent at the Simon's site if the Secretary concludes that Handy Family Trust is in significant violation of the Vermont Underground Storage Tank Regulations or the Underground Storage Tank statute (10 V.S.A., Chapter 59). We realize this may be a lot to absorb and respond to. We are here to help make this process as effective and uncomplicated as possible. Please review the enclosed documents and call me with any questions you may have. I can be reached at (802) 241-3876. Sincerel , Chuck Sc wer, Supervisor Sites Management Section Enclosures (3) cc: South Burlington Selectboard w/o enclosure South Burlington Health Officer w/o enclosure DEC Regional Office w/o enclosure (transmitted electronically) ✓ Kelley Consulting w/o enclosure (transmitted electronically) ✓ CS 112719.wpd WNW N/F AYERS S 67' 29' E 82.99' CV 4 N/F MENDL B STNG RK-fTOF-WAY I 2 L t� cv LEXISTING HIGKT-0E-WAY-,1 q cut-off downcast htninares an N N 20' pole w/ 400 watt metal CV halide IWTPS (4). "' S 67',�9' E 155.00' w v 1' f '� •� 1 N grass area i I N 67' 49 W 69.69, • DEPRESSED DM DETAIL — _ ''-asp!•fP paverflerlt _- — — (O --. direct aa1r6pB \ +1 to new cD. 1 �' 6' reinforced cone. walk Iplte n )5' per foot) a w C, new catch bash / run M50 ZOE es all N -8' reinforced cant. rang n___ I8cccc_=- \ �oexlst. Birch trees to remaln `atop mint o la Ili j � w „QiN N 67' 14' W -proposed 6 stadrade fencce NOTES t. Lhdergrouhd gasolha storage tanks were 9tstalled h the month of 19_ 2. All stpply lines and vapor recovery lln& are fiberglass. The vent Imes are fiberglass :miow grand aria galrwrmd schediae 40 above grotto 3. TAW( CAPACITY C014TW. A 8000 081" aasclhe 8 8000 lial aasollro C WOO awkno Gasolene 4. OWtBWPERATOR- Way or foutIl- Ctmeriano Farms, inc. 777 Dectam Street Canton, MA 02021 (817) 828-4900 5. There are 4' slotted PVC observation wrens. 0 • each omw of tank YGtaliatmi FUN N/F ROE f-3-WO0 gallon (96' dia. x 24'-119 u aargroti d jfiberglass gas4ft st ragc tanks. (top of tanks are T-0' below grade and bottom of tanks are Tl{O* below grade) % - stwosibie pumps w/ leak detector - giedpcket-3/4 horsepower) S 67' 29, �/ '30.46' 2' volt leas , r 00 fj fr`J --4' dia. uhservation well — 25 00' F2 9 F v�� -02 'D -WK level mavtor Y _i.i... - 27X30 corr. pad � recovery , coaxial4 Ci i iv--- Ledlitro dMi-of-way 37.06 1 t : Bt.00 5DM �--' N 25AD' IQ r 2a )01 ' g 3: cc' N Is I I taperf. Cat. ramp I hew 1?' P.V.C. 5.0.01-11 Inrear am down cast milratas I ei 1 aWi+. berm, 1 id —-li"' SIR Y� 173.15' / N 67' 12' W 5.07' PLANTM Slaff"Lf SYMBOL NANE (SPECIES) NO. i SIT • PLANT iNG MP, JRE SIB ONorway Maple (Ater PlatanDMW E 13' caliper - 10- Nth 50' h!gr'v 40' spread wthome r (Crataepu Cruspalll) 7 2' carper - C' rig h I�20' Mon. 25' spread Dotbleflle VbjT rn (Vllxmm TatnentosuN 16 36- high 4' - E' high Rhodo0endrtn (CaroWanrN 21 36' high -- E B. no O Rjgcsa Rose Asa kuDsa) 35 24' tech 2_' 36- high Pepe F. Mugd M gins) 58 24' high --� 6' 48' neon — r.00 h 21' x 64' canopy u 0 F 1 w/ 21' x 32' extcralan NYn. of 14' to lowest point mckideng ligns) / 24' x 65' conc. pad w/ t55' xtWWW rat tapers to 31- 4' W. Island barrier crate draYlap2� �-Ikq' Cone. gas Island wi to exist. cb. 1 t MPD. on each Island. ^/ N 67' 12' W 123.85' / exist. catch basin- existing hedges to be extended mmam snallow swaleJ M ' �'� Inv. - 20651 GREEN SPACE REQUIREME'JTS TOTAL DEB SPACE REOIIIR®: 30% pram spaca required - 14.544.73 sJ_ TOTAL SRE&I SPACE PROVIDED: 23,840.09 s.f. - 5C.0% TOTAL FRONT YARD GREEN SPACE REWI'0: 70% x 50 ft. x 16626 s.f. - 5.819.10 s TOTAL FROf.T YARD GLEE! SPACE PROV:' 2.748.13 s.f. - 33.06' PARKING NOTES PAW K SPACES W-01)YD proposed food store - 30C2.97 s f. • 75Z retal! • 2252 s.f. • 1 space per 1C0 SJ. - 2; parking spaces total parking spacea req*ed - 23 PAWING SPACES PROVIf7fD total parking spaces provided - 19 I CO N � 48,482.44 SXAK Am 30, 1987 April w. V9t AILa9 15. 1988 1.11 ALES _ Jay 13, IM7 May 3. 198 August 37. 1988 ,A.ly 14, 1987 Ma 1. 'Pke3 SeMerroer 12. t988 Vx 1597 Ji 14. S87 Ma 12. 19f8 wmrlber B. 1988 STORE" 8017 -- GAS• 854OT7 September a. 1987 Way 16, rx6 III Fell March 'A. 1U ne 27. 19« Meech 23. 1988 I .ABv 18, V85 am• cafe slgrt140 s t{ raatJ i ffi b ic x� >b g po� s I y j I~ I tllllll� nl WI - exist. catch basin ran - 209.69 Qmnberl'and Farm•- 777 Dedham Street Canton: Massachuselfa O b21 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 7, 1997 Laura Handy 974 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re- Exterior Lighting Dear Laura - ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This letter serves as official approval of your request to install a GMP cobra head light fixture on the pole located in the southeast corner of your property at 974 Shelburne Road subject to several conditions. First, while you indicated to me that the existing pole is located on your property, it appears, based on the locations of fences, that the pole might be located on either #4 or #8 Laurel Hill Drive. The location of the pole should be verified prior to installation of the light fixture. If the pole is found to be located on the adjoining property, the installation of the fixture will require the adjoining property owner's approval. Such approval should be submitted in writing to this office. Please note that the lighting fixture must be located no more than 20 feet above the ground and consist of no more than 250 watts. Also, the fixture must be pointed away, as much as possible, from the adjoining residential property. Thank you for contacting me prior to installing the light fixture. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Si cerely e Weith, City Planner cc- Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 24, 1995 Salamin Handy 75 South Winooski Avenue Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: State Liquor Agency, Simon's Store, 974 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Handy: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that converting approximately 400 square feet of retail space at Simon's Store for state liquor sales does not constitute a change in use. Since no change in use is involved, no zoning permit is required. Please be sure to obtain a sign permit for any changes or additions to your signage. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Since4l Ra m6nd J. Belair, Y Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 14, 1993 Mr. Salamin Handy Handy's Texaco 75 South Winooski Avenue Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Simon's, 974 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Handy: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This is to follow up on my letter to you dated 9/16/92 in which I brought to your attention a violation of your approved site plan. The Planning Commission approval required that your dumpsters be enclosed as shown on the approved plan. As of this date, this requirement has not been met. Therefore, you have seven (7) days in which to correct this violation or be subject to legal action by the City of South Burlington and fines of up to $50 per day for each day the violation continues. Please take care of this matter immediately. Sincer-6ly, Raymo d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: Richard Ward PLANNER 658-7955 i City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 September 24, 1992 Mr. Salamin Handy Handy's Texaco 75 South Winooski Avenue Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Simon's, 974 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Handy: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 In response to my letter to you dated September 16, 1992, Mark Franceschetti of Pleasant Valley Landscapers was in touch with me. He presented me with a list of the landscaping material planted which exceeds the amount of landscaping required. Therefore, I find that you are in compliance with the landscaping component of your site plan. The other issue which still needs to be resolved relates to the dumpsters. Please contact me when this issue is resolved. Sincely, Raym nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: Mark Franceschetti Pleasant Valley Landscp, Inc. COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING & GROUNDS MECEV P.O. Box 1009,Charlotte, VT VT 0054®���Z 802/425-3737 1-800-660-5667 S E P 23 1992 To: City of So. Burlington We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: rROPOSAL Page No. of _ Pages NAME/NO. LOCATION j It !'vl G ✓t S -- � � � +� �11�, PHONE DATE i Z � li- ........................ ......__ ts....... Comm, Pitrp�..1 V' / II....._..... C'�J.(.11 11.N11 tiw /VG cv� e.AptIes .Z /2tc ' it 11. �5� A z (_/� 3 . ..... S 0�a............................ ... .w ....... .......... 3 WE PROPOSE hereby to Payable as follows: �5= la 3/ 1 s> ga ......... r �5` L_G.... 100 G Zyoo ............................ .................... 1? oo l / �ct5�90 material and labor — complete in accordance with these specifications, for the sum of: dollars ($ All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner Authorized according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving Signature extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond NOTE: This proposal may be withdrawn our control. Owner to carry fire. tornado, and other necessary insurance. Our workers are fully by us if not accepted within days. covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL — The prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature PRODUCT 5510-3 Groton, Mass. 01471. To Order PHONE TOLL FREE 1-800-225-6380 Date Signature Date City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 September 16, 1992 Mr. Salamin Handy Handy's Texaco 75 South Winooski Avenue Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Simons, 974 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Handy: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 The Letter of Credit Agreement for landscaping at your 974 Shelburne Road property will be expiring on November 22, 1992. In preparation for releasing this agreement, I inspected your property for conformance with the landscaping plan. I found that six (6) 2"-2 1/2" European Mountain Ash, twelve (12) 24" Spirea and nine (9) 15"-18" Mugo Pine are missing from your site. All misssing plants must be planted as soon as possible. If the plants are not planted the City will be forced to draw funds under this credit to complete the landscaping. Another item which needs your attention is the matter relating to the dumpsters. As you can see on the enclosed drawing, only one (1) dumpster was approved and it has to be screened. You currently have two (2) dumpsters and neither one is screened. The other dumpster is located in parking space #19 which is unacceptable unless approved by the Planning Commission. Therefore, either have one of the dumpsters removed and the other one screened or apply to the Planning Commission for permission to use a parking space for dumpster storage. Please call if you have any questions. sincerlay, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant 1 Encl RJB/mcp PLANNING COMMISSION 27 March 1990 page 6 e) secure sludge disposal area in the quadrant f) move forward with proposed water supply upgrades g) coordinate ultility construction to share easements h) extend CTV throughout the quadrant f) Zoning and Density: Mr. Duppstadt noted this was the most difficult area. The Committee felt zoning should be left pretty much as it is. They said development should be prohibited in conservation areas. They also felt planned residential develop- ments shoud be permitted on residential land of 50+ acres with density bonuses. Clustering, TDR's, etc. should be employed to preserve open land. They felt the maximum number of units in a planned residential development should not exceed 4 per acre. The Committee also felt a maintenance program should be established for conservation land. Mr Shea said it may be possible to have the city buy development rights and sell them to a developer who will build where and what the city wants. He noted this would have to be properly managed. Mr. Burgess thanked the Committee for its efforts. 5. Discussion of Draft #1 of the Recreation Section of the Comprehensive Plan Update Mr Craig noted on p. 39 regarding subdivision transactions, there is a question as to how this will fit in with Act 200 and whether recreation fees can be exacted. Mr. Weith said fees will have to be address. There will have to be a general ordinance on impact fees. A committee was formed on this and their feeling was the city's impact fees are so low no one would challenge them. Mr. Weith noted the plan will have an added discussion on recrea- tion paths and the new city park. They have to get together with the Winooski Park District and also have to update the pedestrian trail list. Mr. O'Neill updated the Commission on the hockey rink efforts and also noted they are beginning the Act 250 process on the Dorset St. City Park. Other Business Mr. Craig asked if the Commission can ask the City Planner, City Manager, and the enforcement person to find out what is actually being built at the Cumberland Farms location. Mr. Weith said he measured it, and they are just building the originally approved PLANNING COMMISSION 27 March 1990 page 7 building. Mrs. Maher said she had heard a rumor there will be a State Liquor Store at that location. Mr. Poger noted the item is being rewarned at the Zoning Board for the Liquor Store. Mr. Burgess asked that the item be placed on next week's agenda. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 10:45 pm. Clerk �� �� PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 May 15, 1990 Mr. Gordon Woods 104 Church Street. Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Snack Shop/gasoline sales, Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Woods: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the March 20, 1990 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please call if you have any questions. ;oe erely,,tom Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp PLANNING COMMISSION 20 March 1990 page 9 plicant was really asking for is a new plan with Adirondack St. as the second access. Members agreed that Adirondack St. was OK as a second access as long as not more than 41 more units are allowed to be built. Mr. Burgess said there was nothing the Commission could do about the 6 people who bought lots. Mr. Weith said he would check with the City Attorney on this. _10. Revised Site Plan application of Salamin Handy to construct a 1260 sq. ft. addition to a 3325 sqft bilding (4585 sQ ft total) for convenience store and gasoline sales use (Cumberland Farms), 984 Shelburne Rd. Mr. Woods said the actual retail space is the same as approved, 2200 sq. ft. The additional 1260 sq. ft. would be for storage. Mr. Austin said they got a variance because there was such an im- provement over what is there now. But he felt there was a problem in that most of the parking is in back and won't, he felt, be used. He wasn't sure the Commission should give them that much more space. Mr. Craig noted it would be a 50% addition. Ms. Peacock didn't want to see anything more, nor did Ms. Pugh. Mr. Belter had no problem with the additional space. Mrs. Maher felt it would be OK to give them half of what they are asking for. As the hour was late, Mr. Craig moved to continue the application until the next available date. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 11:35 pm. Clerk City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 13, 1992 Mr. Slamai.rn lHandy Handy's Texaco 75 South Winooski Avenue Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Simons, 974 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Handy: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Your request to add a second retail sales business within the existing Simon's mini -mart located at 974 Shelburne Road may be considered as a change of use. Since the Planning Commission was not informed of your intent to lease space during your original site plan apr_:ro,.7a1. you may tie rep. uirt!-.. t _ iaPc~ur:? an :'3me.nded permit from them. I understand that Dunkin Donuts is planning to lease space and operate as a separate business. In order to resolve this matter I suggest you contact the City Planner, Joe Weith at 658-7955. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly, kicherd War,i, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp Pleasant Valley Landscapes COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING & GROUNDS MAINTENANCE P.O. Box 5511, Burlington, VT 05402 802/864-1741 Any ���, �ev► S 1 Z — Z q'z C �t rtf r `D .mac y � P Ask 40�' -3c (( / 56 k Jk -'5 �c vk �L'Fll (Avv q3 �Z a try �, 80 CITY OF SOUTH BURkINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION I) OWNER OF RFCOPI) ( name, address, )phone #) --_. �_- ...... �. 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) "C; —r 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #)_ 6, Wad/ .5 , le y Llikik-1-If -5y RZbz cr�� 4).PROJECT STREET ADDRESS GJ �lv� 1, 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE (S C!�`77%�c;"�C Al 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (cv *2'- .%q / t- 7 S 9). LOT COVERAGE: building _2--%; landscaped areas'(6.86%�`f,S1b-3%, building, parking, outside storage .17% 5—J-77o� o 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings E �25����d. a� , Landscaping $4 S`(�c � Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon _; 12-1p.m. _ 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m.__ 4-5 p.m. 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: r /4m 3 pjI ) 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: DATE OF SUBM I S. ION SIGNATURE OF A PPI, I CANT DATE OF HEARING j a -095 - 5:0 'c /' � .$y% � e7- City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 September 7, 1990 Mark Franceschetti Pleasant Valley Landscapers P.O. Box 5511 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Landscaping, Simm's Store, Shelburne Road ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Dear Mark: plo// ve W This is to acknowledge receipt of the andscaping schedule you submitted for Simon's Store on Shel. me Road. I have reviewed the schedule and find that it. is mparable both in types and value of the plantings previously ompimads Therefore, please consider this new schedule approved as a replacement for the one originally approved by the Planning Commission on November 7, 1989. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Qloe Weith, City Planner RJB/mcp Pleasant Valley Landscapes COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING & GROUNDS MAINTENANCE P.O. Box 5511, Burlington, VT 05402 802/864-1741 2J i 514 -�:: k ISM -0 0 # HO )-st0 1 IS ...�...—...-.�r.w—..w...+r►.w wHMa^f .;yM13o� N�Mr l��rG1E��� Ts--. 7�- AY M,.fLMAL 3a ~7, ecr,c �LsTw�oiOts { (� i i P�'K a P ' - ZO Nj. ZS J('KFOD e-itsjettius cisysheww '—"--} ---- -- �� tr"J% vLgU,ZNAX joARt {Lr�uM CAUIIt 14 Will f'y;'r:3 SS 3a. 4& h `Jv✓"�""" � PI��U3 .HL1iio h�uc�NA� � i �r ___�.� Qrr w�avNT4�rl ,f%J TZO P � Ahi itS!" � 2 " %- � �L __ r PIYLeA �LI,I JZ f(70 3 0 T'�Koa4 e- 77 K 2,0 -7 f NO) e) 61 �3 Yea 1-YO 7� lw,iAl J -fyo 333 S' - 94. r a-J4, 4d No Text A-- 3 A- pq 13S- JAA4 I f'o 41 L4ej - udw, 4WAY'd, 7 �-o 9- ,6) N,)f 2"'/o / � �/�o -- 133 1 J PAA P veoperrTy LINES"_ 1 I l i I NOIiT N __._ PLA.AIT.ENH ..._. �Y_41L 1].LLL'Y• �_ lAW 71IF ' PLOuTI N{1 MOTUKL- 11LIC - ,r�.lru.uet L7'.C+I.I•K -Ie': Nlyu: le:'NT..a yN..•o .: NM.HNR:. w.r.{u..•wr_ .! 1+4.L/K'f w.yN.:., v N{: Yf•'il.l.t. 4 - N14N; _ ai 7cDAI{I=� ONA N4 >A'. DS M�N,ryu zt w4vrf 0>I..furl - -lN. PrMNYi'..u4o MuyNa>� S4�N.qu. a�•44.wItiY.L --:4HTINS .SYSTEMS, INC, -)AODEL IN0.1{U.A-A•40/-$NN-F _AD4w Eup Cn METAL HAWW :µAT LEN{r 7P9✓ FlN " = I _PIE* � I -4 Lt4Hr PoLEs L14N11Nc sorCM51 INC- FAOPELNO. MUS-A-175. 6m.-F PIS. JOFCo MFTPL (IALI>r Ff AT LENS (?G U. AS {AANVIA{[UP{C ESy LI4NLIN4 Sy5TCM4 1N4. P,A WA 4212.0 CINCINNATI, ON, 4614p 0 e I I 3 I T L- 1Q L A N :]LOLL- : I - ZOI K.11 ; i : .1 LL I)Ib, - .;S..:-Z TLS r-•. VL 141 FI L-0 A-f T-- SIT: ty1 CON'IrACTO.-. ANi L•RRvl4 01. P0,,1% 1N uAuL= 1710N MOST ee QLFL�IUi LzP N) THL- ARCLIITuCr FJ.. A 0QCIiI0N P)LF0, L-. PI.00Iu0ING wlT t TNc VJ01. - SLL Cu,M.y1 .-LAMD FA._.,. SITL PLAN 014AWI.4CJ FoR LANDSCAPE PLATING SCWLDJLZ, G4uuIJ SPACL QrQu11.1:ML.JT-z AND PAaI:ING NOTL5c AND:',:: DIIiCIi NIjC.,vIM[NSICN;, INfiVI4ATILN,Er4 THE 'W HITE L- -cH jeep'. s) hT rHc- RCP. jtlG L' -,MC !,7.i :- 1''?UIUO�I N4 514,A L L PC 1Ad VC l'; To A rI I IU LOeN TION 114 TIIF 61?i_CN I I_CA AT 'I:.L OCArz. 6A5 I L'IAPS CGS+ of%y Ar1„ :ONCQFTF PAG, f' j AAS CC, 0 _ A u 1 ® y�� k=� 0 .✓��-YI I S PvG r,�, `C"% T LG T. \�d Evil.. CAhN O' 6.N.0. www-WM- E04,81 .NV. ZCGr 51 FaoCSr 1L I I� 5S.66' 7 P�LJILu11VC M. .'C I� P�AcI< 20 (SEE OPIGINA.� �' ' Wf1 Cj q1.. 15'S l`APIIy •. Rau LjN • my.(sArC✓GASH - `E@ Tr LL OF1 4E.PTr . • W � PVPAPS 5101. $`( 1uC. . IMP PI)AAPS- INSTcAo:I't Pvmi3i. 4Vl:tA CVTS ',AMC. b FAM41f44 S11ACCS- 19 �_ (� 107 SIZG- 4s 4dz. 9.P _1.ILAC¢Ot �Y 41101LQINC SIZC 'jS25 S.F. {OT NVL-lI14E: + lWiN4 1%, 6Orr N SPACE A1.a'A MR PLI)4, F'AgVIK 54.2%{ �IS�ownwN CN■CK■O ?,CTE: ; iIS DiI,jC,. 1ND1; ii _7r F'(JbAN C'!Ii>.t.IG > _Nc.✓ oCD%T,-m OCT.196Ct,, p',iAIN%;:L' Ct•3n{V ES G ['r(LIC UT LI 11 (IN� 20kbt= 1260 S.F. 4. G �LDc+Aornnou= 4sss s,r--. ■GL■ 1 INCH 20 FEET 9.$'e 4 YfE W 3PAcf 4 j. o■ .a. 94dz PL04, PA2NIN4 a SG•7 ■M■■T ".PLC�I � C•ra 2 -1440 QW11E4 .Z-43Jl - PL+IISM m-1-e�9 REVISEp 1!-.Il•�y Tj �j s.lDa eEfJ15Qn I0. 7p• Pill -: b0 PRINT k0-W-64 or , ■t.■■.■ PLANNER 658-7955 1 ) City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 January 16, 1990 Mr. Gordon Woods 104 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Cumberland Farms, Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Woods: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the 11/7/89 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please call if you have any questions. c rely � I oe Weit-h, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp re - CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPI, I CAT TON 1) OWNER 01 1tE('ORF) ( name, address, phone # ) .5 I- `" Z� 2) APPLICANT ( name, address, phone #) _ 5 LA1W./ti/ _ /9/5/ U� - 15, °. lyic�fJ� �1C1gk) L I IQ Z'D�lT 0-( ®S71101 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone - 7b,6Z - J42 17 /�-IK12r8-1 5�r-r 4) . PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: (% �j�, ,� ,�Z Ic/ (�,�� QL//Ulr 70& 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USES A13b1T%eP 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building,, square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) A/,- Sys ly -- / Ge 6 r 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 1-) >( Ibis 4'�-" 4�' � 9).LOT COVERAGE: building %; landscaped areas % building, parking, outside storagelL.Z% 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ Landsca ping S rn � -Jw'C Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) S Al ©►gym rev► d�d��t c?r � P/26,Ire 614C111-- e c- Sly 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 45 Z-&qey, Ae, aju= 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) It t�/)r1"w—57elal Estimated trip ends (in and out) Monday through Friday 11-12 noon ; 12-1p.m. _ 3-4 P.M. 4-5 p.m._ 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: during the following hours: ; 1-2 p.m. ; 2-3— ; 5-6 p.m. _; 6-7 p.m. 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: — BATE —OF St.BMISSION SIGNATURE OF A7PI.ICANT DATE OF NEARING PLEASE SUBMIT FIVE COPIES AND ONE REDUCED COPY (8 1/2 X 11 OR 8 1/2 X 14) OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible). Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. Existing and proposed curbcuts, pavement, walkways. Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to of greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' x 18') with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required. Number and location of compact car spaces. (This requires separate Planning Commission approval). Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. (13 feet by 20 feet in size, one per every fifty spaces). Location of septic tanks (if applicable). Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Building footprint, building, parking and outside storage, and landscaped areas. Location of site (Street # and lot #). North arrow. Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. -2- M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: November 7, 1989 agenda items Date November 3, 1989 3) GREEN ACRES, HINESBURG ROAD 1. The 142.2 acre parcel will have an 80 foot future road r.o.w. extended to the Williston Town line when the location is agreed upon with Williston. 2. The lotand road layout plan dated 10/"_ t-r IL Trudell Engineering is acceptable. 4) DEGRAFF DEVELOPMENT, PATCHEN ROAD 1. Plan no. 1 will make if very difficult if not impossible to get a delivery truck around the curve near unit no. 4. 2. Density is too high for the amount of usable land. 3. I think plan no. 2 is better than plan no. 1 but it. will still be difficult to drive a delivery truck around the parking island. 6) BENSEN - 2 LOT SUB -DIVISION 1. Residents of the commercial lot shall have access over the residential lot to get to the bank and post office. 2.. Plan prepared by Gordon Woods dated April 1986 and revised September 1989 is acceptable. 7) CUMBERLAND FARMS, SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Additional inlets or openings in the curb should be provide,l to drain the parkins area. 2. Details such as type of drain pipe, site lighting, s 6- -,;aIk, sign shown on previously approved plan should apply to new plan. Name: r7tdvi INMIK Contact: O)li'lv(ails rvA 4 ) TELEPHONE MEMO Date: Subject f;,y "41t-4,v rAl -1) My, W WMIA e M,,Oa�4ktJ .0wi 7 vet. c 4 4U� ud ud 4vuveeff'), 6 44 t''` I L/ �4b�L), fZLl-qqAly- I ------------------ Signature ire Ole, )ttttetlt t•� 1 f =ii ; +_ orfirt i�,trert ` =,niiifi } 11111 Li IL!11 llermout 05411 I r (802) 658-7960 TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE RE: TUESDAY NOVEMBER 7,1989 AGENDA ITEMS DATE: WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 1.1-989 1. HAL BENSEN 2-LOT SUBDIVISION PROPOSED CAR PORTS PLANS REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH THE PROJECT. 2. 361 PATCHEN ROAD 8-UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLANS REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ON 2-SETS OF PLANS OF DIFFRENT DESIGN. I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT ON BOTH PLANS BUT I FEEL WITH SOME WORK THE PROBLEM CAN BE CORRECTED. AT THIS TIME THE PROJECT SHOULD NOT BE APPROVED UNTIL CORRECTIONS ARE MADE. 3. CUMBERLAND FARM PROJECT SHELBURNE ROAD PLANS REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT. Memorandum - Planning November 7, 1989 agenda items November 3, 1989 Page 6 Coverage: Coverage requirements are met for both parcels. Other: The plan shows 16 carports in two buildings. These carports do not exist and I believe they never received final Planning Commission approval. Therefore, they should not be shown on the plan. 7) CUMBERLAND FARMS, 924 SHELBURNE ROAD Salamin Handy proposes to construct a 3,325 square foot conven- ience store with two gas pumps on a 1.11 acre parcel. The site is currently occupied by a similar use (Morgan Stores). The existing building would be demolished. The property is in the Commercial 1 zone and in Traffic Overlay District 1. To the east and northeast are residences, to the south is the Bagel Bakery. The balance of surrounding uses are commercial. Although the existing use is permitted, it is non -confirming structurally. The coverage is excessive and the gas pumps are located in the right-of-way, on the southern property line. In June of 1988, the Planning Commission approved the demolition of the existing store, construction of the new store and reloca- tion of the gas pumps. New plans show a 300 square foot increase in retail space. The number of proposed gas pumps has been reduced from 3 to 2. These two gas pumps could service 4 vehi- cles simultaneously, as is currently the case. Access: Access is shown from two curb cuts on Shelburne Road. These curb cuts will be signed. The northern one is a 14 foot wide exit only; the southern driveway is 36 feet wide and serves as a shared driveway with the Bagel Bakery property and office building to the southeast. Circulation: The plan shows a 28 foot wide aisle along the northern side of the building and circulation entirely around the building. Parking: Twenty-five parking spaces are required based on 75% retail usage (or 2,494 square feet). The plan shows 19 spaces including two handicapped. Five are located in front of the building. The rest are behind the proposed store. Last year, the Planning Commission waived the additional spaces in order to preserve existing clumps of birch. It appears this birch clump will be disrupted by the proposed parking and circulation area. N. Memorandum - Planning November 7, 1989 agenda items November 3, 1989 Page 7 Landscaping: The proposed development requires $3750 in new landscaping. Planned to be planted are 10' maples, 8' Hawthorns, mugho pine _,i_J flowering shrubs which meets the required value. Setbacks and Frontage: All setbacks are in compliance with the exception of the side yard bordering the R-4 district. Here it is required to have a 65' set -back and only 50' is shown. A variance was approved by the Zoning Board on 10/23/89. Coverage: Coverage requirements are met except for front yard coverage. Proposed front yard coverage is 60% while a maximum of 30% is allowed. Front yard coverage is currently 100%. The applicant received a variance to e;_ceed front. yard coverage on 10/23/89. Traffic: This 1.11 acre parcel allows 18 trip ends during the peak hour. The current use most likely exceeds this generation. The new use would probably increase trip generation since the retail store will be larger than the current store (number of pumps, stays the same). Access for the site is being drastically improved with the proposed plan. Other: At last year's approval, the height of the gas pump canopy was reviewed by the Fire Department and City Engineer. Applicant states that the canopy height will be a minimum of 14' for safety reasons. The minutes from the 6/88 approval are enclosed. 8) PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE, HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE Enclosed are the proposed amendments to Sections 18.112 and 19.35 of the Zoning Regulations regarding height of structures. The major points are summarized below: o Method of measurement: Section 18.112(a) addresses the "plumb bob" concept of measuring the height of structure. Basical- ly, a line is drawn parallel to the ground 35 feet high. All points of the structure must be under this line. The drawings simulate this concept.. The first drawing meets the height limit. The next two do not. o Pre -construction grade vs. post -construction: At the last meeting, the Commission was concerned with pre -construction grade in situations where sites need to be filled (i.e. wet sites). AT the same time, the Commission was concerned with post. -construction grade being manipulated to get a higher 7 11/7/89 JW MOTION OF APPROVAL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Site Plan application of Salamin Handy for construction of a 3,325 square foot building for convenience store and service station use as depicted on a plan entitled, "New Cumberland Farms Store", prepared by Gordon G. Woods Associates, Architects and dated October, 1989, last revised 10/20/89 with the following stipula- tions: 1. The applicant shall post a $3,750, 3-year landscaping bond prior to permit. The landscape plan shall be revised to correct- ly show the location of the existing birch clump. This birch clump shall be preserved. 2. The parcel is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 1 (Article XVII of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations) which allows a generation of 18 peak hour trip ends. Based on I.T.E. trip generation rates, the proposed use will generate at least 24 peak hour trip ends. The Planning Commission approves a trip genera- tion in excess of the 18 peak hour trip end limit since it be- lieves the proposed access improvements will significantly im- prove the traffic safety situation of the site. 3. The Planning Commission approves 19 parking spaces and waives 6 required spaces. It is the Commission's opinion that 19 spaces will be sufficient since the pumping stations will also serve as parking spaces. 4. The plan shall be revised to show the existing water serv- ice relocated to the north side of the proposed building. The location and size of the water service shall be approved by CWD prior to permit. 5. All lighting shall be cut-off luminare. 6. The plan shall be revised to show inlets or openings in the curb in order to adequately drain the parking area. 7. The details for drain pipes, lighting, sidewalk and sign shown on the attached plan entitled "Cumberland Farms, Site Plan." dated 3/19/87 shall apply to this project. 8. A revised plan addressing the stipulations above shall be approved by the planner prior to permit. 9. A building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 November 3, 1989 Mr. Gordon Woods 104 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Cumberland Farms, 984 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Woods: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also en- closed are Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, November 7, 1989 at 7:30 P.M. t represent your request. Sincerely, Joe Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp NORTMI P LA 617 tWel .1 L-DU L' 7YMCIJL NpMk• (�NtGI FS� W. JIZtr 1-0.1 N4 MlTIJKF ;Izv O Naicra ..1PLr - rv•)•u..�an s. f�.4 LPr[-lo' HiyN !o NL Ia)rrtr.o � t"<+LLPrr:•i H�4N >-N3. t>')PFwc.. c«'IPun Hswry '..r t1T1r4u) t4u 41L_ Oou.LIPLLk VLgURNuu --�_-_ li ��• H.yN I •i/ N.4. VL6UtL.1). Ta1.1u ................ 4. tVhY31 p>1. M. lr.4 !i JI•N..IN MUGS nN1 JJ !1•VI[,N 1t.-V N.yN r..+u1 1.Y4o +.uyN 4> - 3 I T E 1` L( A IJ 3461.L- : I • ZOO - " LIOTEI� P�JllullVG MOVED PjACIC 20 ($EE OVILINAL) LANNSWINC, SEE TA3LE ON Lff .N PUMPS 110E P3lf 1510E. IWv PUMPS - INSTCA1-I or S PEJM13 S. 001213 CUTS 9AMC--. PAI214IN4 5PhCCS- 19 LOT SIZL 48,40Z. S.I• 1.11ACQCY +JUILQINQ SIZG 3>S2S S.F. 60trM SPACO 41.5 PJLoy,PAItaNc S4.2% —N07k: PHIS DLUG, INpICA C,ES iFit MP CA Wc; S, . 1 I PE0t C" 1.-?C e •tc p l?,( '•5 Paull �c-�. I 7fAr.r. NI..MMM»>�^ p..WN cN.�N.p O.T. .c.L. 1 INCH Tl[ I Jp■ Np. .M..T p/ ■N.. T. SC��bt"4 • PLANNING COMMISSION 3 APRIL 1990 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 3 April i990, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present William Burgess, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, John Belter, Ann Pugh, David Austin Also Present Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; James Condos, Patrick Reed,Al Brunini, Norman Thorpe,Marion Thorpe, Bruce Thibaud, Robert Rochefort, Dave Butterfield, Simon Handy, Karen Cady, Anne Byrnes, Tina MacLeod, Mary Merchant, Anne McKenzie, Eleanor H. Billings, Carl Cobb, Tyler Hart, Homer and Marie DuBois, Clorinda Leddy, Lance Llewellyn, John Larkin, Salamin Handy,Gordon Woods 1. Other Business a) Mr. Weith said that Denny Blodgett has changed his plan again to be more like the first one. Members agreed to go right to final plat. b. IDX needs a 6-month extension for their day-care facility which has been approved. Mrs. Maher moved to grant the 6-month extension for IDX's day care facility approval. Mr. Austin seconded Motion passed unanimously. c) Colonia Motor Inn has asked to postpone their review until 5/22. They are awaiting an appraisal. d) Mr. Weith gave members the Planning Guide for affordable housing prepared by GBIC and given to the City Council last night. 2. Review Minutes of 30 January 1990 Ms. Pugh moved to approve the Minutes of 30 January 1990 as written. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Continue site plan applicationof Salamin Handy to construct a 1260 sq. ft. addition to a 3325 sg ft. building (4585 sq.ft. total) for convenience store and gasoline sales use (Cumberland Farms), 984 Shelburne Rd. PLANNING COMMISSION 3 April 1990 page 2 Mr. Burgess advised that the applicant has now proposed an addition that would be half the size (658 sq. ft.). He said the Commission could vote on the original application and then ask for another application for the smaller addition though he was inclined to consider the amended motion. He said the issue of trip ends would still be critical. 18 are allowed and there are hundreds proposed with either plan. Members agreed to let the applicant present the amended plan. Mr. Woods said they would be cutting back to the original Cumber- land farms size. Mr. Brunini, who owns property adjacent to the Handy property, said he did not feel this was the size originally approved for Cumberland Farms. Mr. Woods said they are asking for a storage area in back. Mr. Burgess asked what the status of the liquor store application was noting that 2 weeks ago Mr. Handy had said there would be no liquor store and last week he told the Zoning Board there would be a liquor store. Mr. Handy affirmed there would be no liquor store on this site. Mr. Austin noted the storage area would be accessible only from the outside. Mr Woods said that's because the walk-in freezer is in the way inside. Mr. Belter asked what would be the result if it were stipulated that the addition was only for storage. Mr. Weith said the traffic numbers still go up because storage is included in square footage for traffic calcuation purposes. Mr. Burgess noted that there are 102 peak hour trips for the existing use. The Commission approved 206 for Cumberland Farms last fall, and the applicant now proposes 247. 18 are allowed in this overlay zone. Mr. Weith also noted they are short 2 parking spaces when measured by retail floor area. Mr. Belter said the reason this store was allowed in the first place is that the developer was improving the lot. He didn't think 600 sq. ft. more of storage would create more traffic and thought this would be an attractive property. He had no problem with allowing the addition. Mrs. Maher said if she could be as- sured the addition was only for storage and that there would never be a liquor store there, she could consider voting for it. Mr. Austin felt the approved building was already significantly larger than the previous one and didn't feel the improvements outweighed the size. He felt parking and circulation were bad as most of the parking is in the rear and didn't feel people would use it. PLANNING COMMISSION 3 April 1990 page 3 Ms. PUgh agreed with Mr. Austin and opposed the addition of storage space. Mr. Burgess said he didn't care about the size; however, he couldn't believe Cumberland Farms had asked for a store without considering storage space and that the proposed addition really adds retail space. He added that when Roger Dickenson made his traffic estimates, he used total square footage for a building with retail and storage and that is what is now being considered. On that basis he said he would oppose it. Mr. Austin made the following motion regarding the Site Plan ap- plication of Salamin Handy to construct a 658 sq. ft. addition to a 3325 sq. ft. building for convenience store and gasoline sales use (Cumberland Farms), 984 Shelburne Rd: This matter came before the South Bulrin ton Planning Commission on the application of Salamin Handy for Site Plan Approval under the South Burlington Zoning Regulations to construct a 658 sq ft addition to an existing gas station convenience store building located at 974 Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington. The proposed addition is shown on a plan entitled "New Cumberland Farms Store" prepared by Gordon G. Wood Associates, dated 10/89 and last revised 3/27/90. For the reasons set forth below, the Planning Commission concludes that the requested addition does not comply with the requirements of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and must be disapproved: 1. The requirements applicable to Site Plan review are set forth in Section 19.10 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations 2. Sections 19.102 and 19.103 require the Planning Commission to review adequacy of traffic access and impact of vehicles entering and exiting the site on adjoining streets. 3. The subject property is located within Traffic Overlay Zone #1 as designated by Section 17.201 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Therefore, in evaluating the adequacy of traffic access for this site, the Planning Commission must consider the Zoning Regulation requirements applicable in the Traffic Overlay l)i -,t- ri rrt 4. Based on the size of the subject property, the pro erty is al- located a maximum of 18 peak hour trips. Section 17.30. With the present use of the property, it is estimated that it generates 206 peak hour trips. For this reason, the peak hour trip generation for the subject property far exceeds that authorized for the subject propert 5. The requested addition will result in an increase of approx- imately 41 peak hour trips. PLANNING COMMISSION 3 April 1990 page 4 6. The Planning Commission is authorized to approve an increase in peak hour trips beyond those specifically authorized for property when it finds that "other site improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow in the vicinity." Section 17.50. In making this determination the Planning Commission is authorized to consider matters such as those set forth in Sections 17.501 through 17.504. 7. The increase in peak hour trips for this property necessarily results in an increase in turning movements into and out of the subject property. 8_ The access for the property is not served by an approach or de- celeration lane for entering traffic or an acceleration lane for exiting traffic. In addition, there are no existing or proposed traffic control devices such as a left hand turn lane for accom- modating entering or exiting left hand t 9. The deceleration and stopping of vehicles to enter the subject property, and especially those making left hand turning movements into the property, significantly impacts the traffic handling capability of the adjoining public roadway and results in unsafe traffic conditions. 10. Vehicles exiting the property and especially those attemptin left hand turning movements, have a similar adverse impact on the adjoininq public roadwa ll.Given the high peak hour trip generation already accorded this property and the absence of any site improvements that will in any way improve traffic access between the subject property and the adjoining public road, the Planning Commission concludes that there is absolutely no benefit to approving the requested addition. For the reasons set forth above, the planning Commission hereby denies the above -described application for Site Plan Approval. Ms. PUgh seconded. The motion to deny passed 3-2 with Mr. Belter and Mrs. Maher opposing. Mrs. Maher noted she voted in favor of the addition on the contin- gency that the requested added space be only for storage and that there never be a liquor store at the location and due to the nature of the business she felt the applicant might use an outside storage vehicle parked on the lot which, she felt, would be a worse situation. Memorandum - Planning March 20, 1990 agenda items March 16, 1990 Page 5 10) CUMBERLAND FARMS, SHELBURNE ROAD Mr. Handy proposes to construct a 1,260 square foot addition to a 3,325 square foot building for convenience store and gasoline sales use. The 3,325 square foot building was approved by the Planning Commission on 11/7/89 (minutes enclosed) and is present- ly under construction. Access, circulation, utilities and landscaping would not change from that originally approved. Parking: The proposed use requires 33 parking spaces (assuming 3,325 square feet of retail floor area). The plan shows 20 spaces plus 4 pumping stations (24 total spaces). Traffic: The site is located in traffic overlay zone 1 which allows 18 peak hour trips. Roger Dickinson conducted a trip generation analysis which indicates that the current use gener- ates 102 trips during the peak hour. The approved plan (11/7/89) would generate 206 peak hour trips. The Planning Commission approved the increase in trip generation because of the substan- tial access improvements proposed. The project with the proposed addition would generate 284 peak hour trips, 78 more than originally approved. No additional access improvements are proposed. PAGE #2 4. 5. CUMBERLAND FARM SITE TUESDAY MARCH 2O,1990 PLANNING MEETING 974 SHELBURNE ROAD AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH THIS PROJECT. BLODGETT PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT HOLMES RD/GREEN MT. DR. PLANS REVIEWED AND AT THIS TIME THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE LOOKED AT: A. HYDRANT INFRONT OF UNIT 6 & 7 MUST BE RELOCATED TO THE CENTER OF CIRCLE AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPT. B. I HAVE A CONCERN THAT THE ROAD LEADING TO THE UNITS IS FROM GREEN MT. DRIVE. WHICH IS A MILE FROM THE SOUTH END FIRE STATION. ALSO BECAUSE OF THE SHELBURNE ROAD PROBLEM WITH THE NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS WE HAVE AT SHELBURNE RD AND GREEN MT. DRIVE THERE CAN BE A PROBLEM WITH TRAFFIC BACK UP TO BEABLE TO GET EQUIPMENT UP GREEN MT. DRIVE. THE CITY PLAN HAS BEEN TO EXTEND HOLMES ROAD WHICH WOULD BE LESS TIE UP AND CLOSER FOR EQUIPMENT TO RESPOND. 6. LAKE WOOD COMMON SHELBURNE ROAD RLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE BUILDING I DO FEEL THAT WE HAVE A PARKING PROBLEM. AT DIFFRENT TIMES OF THE DAY NOW WITH JAKE'S RESTAURANT ALL PARKING IS TAKEN AND PEOPLE PARK IN THE ROAD WAY WHICH WOULD MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO GET EMERGENCY EQUIPMENY IN IF NEEDED, WITH ANOTHER BUILDING I FEEL IT WILL BE WORST. PLUS WHEN THE DEVELOPMENT WAS APPROVED WE CALLED FOR A LOOP WATER SYSTEMTO BE TIED IN AT HOLMES ROAD AND SHELBURNE ROAD DUE TO THE SIZE OF THE DEVELOPMENT. ON THE PLAN I SEE THE WATER SYSTEM HAS ONLY TIED IN FROM HOLMES. IF THE COMMISSION APPROVE'S THE BUILDING THE TIE IN TO SHELBURNE ROAD SHOULD BE DONE. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 March 16, 1990 Mr. Gordon Woods 1-04 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Minimart and gasoline sales, Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Woods: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also en- closed are Bill Szymanski's comments. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, March 20, 1990 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. i cerely, Joe Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp Memorandum - City Engineer March 20, 1990 agenda items March 16, 1990 Page 2 8) BLODGETT PROPERTY, HOLMES ROAD - GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE 1. Pavement width should be at least 24 feet even for one way traffic. This will allow emergency vehicles to pass if someone is parked in the area. 2. The road shall remain private and maintained by residents until such time as Holmes Road is extended and connected. 3. The sidewalk should be constructed one foot from the r.o.w. line. The water main shall be within this grassed strip. 9) BUTLER FARMS, DUBOIS DEVELOPMENT, HINESBURG ROAD 1. Both developers shall be in agreement on who will build what portion at the street connection. 2. The street connection shall have a curb opening for access to the sewage pumping station. 10) CUMBERLAND FARMS, SHELBURNE ROAD Storm drainage details shall be submitted for review and approv- al. .. �. .. .. .. .. .. �vv- •`w`+�`O v+rv'v-�1rvr WV'VVV''w'vvu'vr!'V`v^N-.rw•t,.vwti.•.!'r'+arV'vr Ti� iDer P-T' ,,,R,L fir . I bop . F1�L s�V, 5 L k W � t �� S�GoyLq� G'vtiCe� ILI:LA �ID (A -IC cc-. Q_je� C JviG!/vi 3io� 1*7-r/ T1N uE R1Z W I L FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 March 12, 1990 Mr. Gabriel Handy 21 Pine Meadow Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 RE: Trip Generation Calculations - Proposed Addition Cumberland Farms Store - 974 Shelburne Road South Burlington FILE: 90037 Dear Mr. Handy: As requested, we have determined that the proposed addition to the new Cumberland Farms Store (presently under construction) will increase the previously approved trip generation of this parcel by 70 - 80 vte/hour. Additionally, we estimate that approximately 90% of this additional traffic will be diverted from northbound traffic already passing by on Shelburne Road. Enclosed please find a copy of our calculations. Should you have any questions or if we may be of additional assistance, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Rog J. Dickinson, P.E. cc w/ enclosure Gordon Woods t Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting • Surveying FITZPATRICK-LLEWELM CORPORATED One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 WL� c Ic JOB SHEET NO. OF — CALCULATED BY J_� DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE '✓%:)� 1 17VG TfZ I� �...._...u..►`..a...... .....1..... .... ...... .. - a .... ............:.............r..... ...__ .__........... _....... .. .._. 1 .�U ,'��l ................................................. ...—....__-- ...... ...............:.............:.............;............ _,.............r............. ...... ....... ............. ............. :....................................... .......... .........{..... ...................._.a..............._`............_._..... a ............a..............:....................1._.._...�..................._ i3 E .....-5 .3..:.................._v..............,......;.............:.._ : s ....................... 3 ...... i ..... � ... .......... .. _._. ......................._...................s..�.3.. I U 1 13 'off i............... ;..........................:....................._...{. s _ ......;._..........s...........�._....__.. I ....._ .......__ ..... ..... ...... r.._ ._.. .... `v I I v ' 1 : v o a.. Ise v a �v 'v I �� ►� aR z Ll PRODUCE 2XI Inc, Dom, M— Olpl. TDB �fUv<7 - ,,,),c,-ZLAN� C� FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN "ORPORATED One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 SHEET NO. OF _ CALCULATED BY �'J ^:/ DATE 2 Iy^l ��'✓ CHECKED BY DATE SCALE Y� I� ':G� CrQI�T �Uly C/)LcS. . ......... . _. ..... ...._ _ .... i e .............. .........................�..... _..... _ _..,.............,.............i............. ; { € t ,.... j ( € :... :... .... ..... .... E i .. ..... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...................._.._ ._..... ......._..........._..............L............a........:..........«.........._:...... ._l........ '" .�...P....+��....�.......... Ga..t�..........t.�.LJ.�rf:...Z......�.G.... .... ...... .... ..... a' Gad. _ 7 r......a.,.........._.................................... 3 ._3� 5Ls i x 6a U �, c F 1, ....:.... .... _U .............. .......................... -- -,ti -- ..... ..... i ......... i........................... ;.._........_i.............F.........._.............. •....... ..... ............_:..............:.............:.............................i......... ..... ..... .........i................ .... .... ... : i i ; SOPJ I�� 1't lq J�UCIK..N l... - -..............i..........................`......... „ t �. ._............. .. ...�.... ..... ..... ... .... ....... ;y x .... .._:.... ...�f����.._1 F.......................4� E i .........�............. ;........ G . v� c/N� K F- ... ...... - - ...... ...... .... .. ............. .............. ....... .....i.............. ....._._................__... ...... ............ ... .... - «....._.._ .... i .....s...... Ir- ............ ............. ..... ...........w......... ........ ...s .c,L.... , .......... h .. ..... . 3 uU . S.,..�:..............�c.,ram....�._.......74.............�.. ...... ..... .......... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... .. a..4i .v.. .........._ ..._......... `....T .... S.atcs.s....._�lAs..._!a Ti.'i� ° C��Ca�,lu,U ���� c „.... ....r.. .._.. ..... ...... ... .........._. L.....__...........................:......... : 1 .......#.... ...... ...... ..... ...... ..... i T R6lYI/a,nilN t7JCV .' ..................../!C............„.............,..............;......................tz.C.il...;�....................... ___ ............ i --- +i( X/M. 'zt 1 i 's `............i.............i.............. .._ ._... i ..._ .....F............ t t iR000C12WI ®Ina, Wm, M— 01/71. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: April 3, 1990 agenda items Date: March 30, 1990 3) CUMBERLAND FARMS, SHELBURNE ROAD Mr. Handy proposes to construct a 1,260 square foot addition to a 3,325 square foot building for convenience store and gasoline sales use. This application was first heard two weeks ago and postponed in order for the City Attorney to draft a denial motion (enclosed). Most of the concern seemed to center around traffic and impacts on surrounding residential uses. The applicant has submitted a revised site plan which shows a smaller addition (658 square foot addition). This addition does not encroach into the 65 foot setback from residential zones. The property is located in traffic overlay zone 1 which allows a peak hour trip generation of 18 trips. A breakdown of trip generation estimates based on an analysis prepared by Roger Dickinson is provided below: Use Peak Hour Generation 1. Existing 102 2. Approved Use (3,325 sq. ft.) 206 3. Approved building with 1,260 sq. ft. addition (4,585 sq. ft.) 284 4. Approved building with 658 sq. ft. 247 addition (3,983 sq. ft.) 4) BUTLER FARMS, HINESBURG ROAD This application is being continued from the 3/20/90 meeting. I informed you of the City Attorney's opinion regarding whether 6 building permits could be issued before opening a second access. As reported, he felt that the permits could be issued under Section 513, "Subdivision Waivers", of the Subdivision Regula- tions. 1 . 1% �� � 4/3/90 JW 0 MOTION OF APPROVAL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Salamin Handy to construct a 658 square foot addition to a 3,325 square foot building (3,983 square foot total) for convenience store and gasoline sales use as depicted on a plan entitled, "New Cumberland Farms Store," prepared by Gordon G. Woods, Associates and dated 10/89, last revised 3/27/90 with the following stipulations: 1) The parcel is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 1 (Article XVII of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations) which allows a gener- ation of 18 peak hour trip ends. The proposed use is anticipated to generate 247 peak hour trip ends during the peak hour. The Planning Commission approves a trip generation in excess of the 18 peak hour trip end limit since it believes the proposed access improvements as originally approved on 11/7/89 will significantly improve the traffic safety situation of the site. 2. The Planning Commission approves 20 parking spaces and waives 2 required spaces. It is the Commission's opinion that 20 spaces will be sufficient since the 4 pumping stations will also serve as parking spaces. 3) The stipulations contained in the 11/7/89 approval and not superseded by this approval shall apply. 4) the building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. 4/3/90 JW V MOTION OF APPROVAL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Salamin Handy to construct a 1,260 square foot addition to a 3,325 square foot building (4,585 square feet total) for convenience store and gasoline sales use as depicted on a plan entitled, "New Cumberland Farm Store," prepared by Gordon G. Woods, Associates and dated 10/89, last revised 2/14/90 with the following stipulations: 1) The parcel is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 1, (Article XVII of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations) which allows a generation of 18 peak hour trip ends. The proposed use is antic- ipated to generate 284 peak hour trip ends during the peak hour. The Planning Commission approves a trip generation in excess of the 18 peak hour trip end limit since it believes the proposed access improvements as originally approved on 11/7/89 will sig- nificantly improve the traffic safety situation of the site. 2) The Planning Commission approves 20 parking spaces and waives 2 required spaces. It is the Commission's opinion that. 20 spaces will be sufficient since the 4 pumping stations will also serve as parking spaces. 3) The stipulations contained in the 11/7/89 approval and not superseded by this approval shall apply. 4) The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 March 30, 1990 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Mr. Gordon Woods 104 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Convenience store and gasoline sales, Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Woods: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and mph comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, April 3, 1990 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. S' erely, Joe Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp �'�� `�.-c.�'wv_ �: _�_• yw cry � �� '-- l � Rr,a � F+�'' 3Y�f � 6 Planning File Data for Computer Input 1. Original Property Owner S 2. Developer's Name 3. Name of Development _ C-"�,. � / �.�. 4. Address of Development or Project 71/_ 5�. ��---- 5. Type of Project_.__ sf. �s�.G,- �,.�. �. �._.✓' �►-.,.s Minor Subdivision (WI) Major Subdivision (MS) Site Plan (SP) 6. Zoning District 1 �- 2 7. Zoning District Z R. 'Zoning Board Approval date if Required 9. Date of Planning Commission Hearings/Meetings Site Plan Date or -- -- Sketch Plan Date 10. Preliminary Plat date _ 11. Final Plat Date 1'L. Revised Final Plat Date 1 (if applicable) 1 3 . Revised Final Plat Date 2 (if applicable) 14. Acreage of Total Project 1 5 . Ilse of Land 1 itrLit.,�" 1 G . Use of band 2 Usc• o t' Land 3 of band 4 1'.4. Number of Lots ct. tiumher of Single I-ami I Un.it�. 2 1 . titnnher of Multi - Brim i I v L1ni t5 ��. t'mitit rit(•t icon (lost of Bui Idin /7LS_ ova G`v4 - Cold 7 3 23. Size of Building (Square footage) _ 3�-s''#� �OJ41 r - 24. Streets _-_5 City Street, CS Private Street PS 25. Date of Acceptance of streets by City 26. Bond -Landscaping 3 1 SD 27. Bond -Streets 28. Bond -Sewer 29. Bond -Water 30. Bond -Other 31. Date Mylar Due (90 days after approval) 32. Date Recorded - 33. Expiration date of Approval 34. Date of First Building Permit 34 . Tax Map Number 66-" 36. Map File Location 1 37. Map File Location 2 38. Map File Location 3 Other fees (Type and amount) Preparers Name: JAJw� Date: Posted in Computer (Name, Date):_ 4 PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 April 17, 1990 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Mr. Gordon Woods 104 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Convenience store/gasoline sales, 984 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Woods: Enclosed are the 4/3/90 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please call if you have any questions. S erely, Joe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp CONVENIENCE MARKET (851) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1,000 SQUARE FEET GROSS FLOOR AREA On a: WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HOUR OF GENERATOR TRIP GENERATION RATES Average Vehicle Trip Ends (Weekday—A.M. Peak Hour of Generator) per 1,000 Square Feet Gross Floor Area Average Range of Standard Number of Trip Rate Rates Deviation Average 1,000 Studies Square Feet GFA 75.556 25.000-145.000 9 2.0 NO PLOT OR EQUATION AVAILABLE DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION: 48% enter, 52% exit. CONVENIENCE MARKET (851) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1,000 SQUARE FEET GROSS FLOOR AREA On a: WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR OF GENERATOR TRIP GENERATION RATES Average Vehicle Trip Ends (Weekday —P.M. Peak Hour of Generator) per 1,000 Square Feet Gross Floor Area Average Range of Standard Number of Average 1,000 Trip Rate Rates Deviation Studies Square Feet GFA 71.722 25.000-213.000 9 2.0 NO PLOT OR EQUATION AVAILABLE DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION: 52% enter, 48% exit. Trip Generation, September 1987/Institute of Transportation Engineers 1243 Trip Characteristics of Convenience Markets with Gas Pumps by The Montana Technical Committee of the Intermountain Section of ITE onvenience markets with gaso- line pumps have flourished throughout the United States in the past 10 years. The growing demand for self-service gasoline and conven- ience grocery goods, readily accessible with fast service, have fueled a boom in the convenience market business. As transportation engineers and planners, we are asked to determine the impacts of developments on the transportation system. Because the convenience mar- ket is a relatively new concept and lim- ited data exist in the literature on the trip characteristics of these stores, we de- cided to study the trip characteristics of convenience markets with gas pumps in the Billings, Montana, area. The objec- tives of the study were to 1. Define the trip generation character- istics of convenience markets with gas pumps. 2. Analyze the trip characteristics of pa- trons to these markets. 3. Determine the trip assignment char- acteristics for these markets by dis- tinguishing primary trips, diverted linked trips, and nondiverted linked trips. Definitions Certain terms used in this report are defined as follows: • Convenience market with gas pumps: A store that sells convenience food items, gasoline products, and other car products and that is usually open 15 to 16 hours per day. It has self-ser- vice gas pumps and between 1400 and 2400 square feet of gross floor area; one person manages the store. Trip-- A siraLe o- �. hick Trip Enos: T re L-, i cr ad 7-es rterrc plus all trips leaving the site over a given period of time. Primary trips: Trips from home, work, or school to the convenience market that return directly to point of origin. The trip's only purpose was shopping at the convenience market. Diverted linked trips: Trips in which the stop at the convenience market is part of a sequence of two or more stops within the total trip and where the stop at the convenience market required a route diversion from the route that would otherwise be followed if the stop at the convenience market were not made. Nondiverted linked trips: Trips in which the stop at the convenience market is part of a sequence of two or more stops within the total trip and where the driver was already traveling on the street on which the conven- ience market is located. Methodology Local convenience markets with gas pumps were plotted on a map to deter- mine general site characteristics; the characteristics are listed in Table 1. Store managers or store headquarters were contacted for permission to survey their sites. Five sites on arterial streets were selected for the survey. At each site, three people conducted the survey: one person recorded all traffic movement in and out of the site, and two interviewed customers. The interviewers were stationed near the entrance of the building and at- tempted to interview everyone entering the store. Each interviewer had a data form on whiff to reed roCori--es as Icu c::r-E block number)? 2. Is that your home, work place, school, shopping place, or other? 3. Where are you going from here (street and block number)? 4. Is that your home, work place, school, shopping place, or other? 5. Do you usually pass by this store? 6. Did you go out of your way to stop here today? Each interviewer had the discretionary power to vary the language to suit his or her individual communication skills. Be- cause all interviewers were professional transportation engineers and planners, the intent of the questions was well known, and throughout the progress of the study, the wording and approach to the interviews were adjusted to improve communication with those being inter- viewed. The most critical problems observed were questions involving origins and destinations and interpreting whether the motorist really understood the concept of going out of your way. Frequently our data indicated that the stated origins and destinations would require a completely different route than what the motorist de- scribed as on the way. Recognizing that people do not necessarily follow the most logical routing because of acquired habits or for other reasons, the answers to question number six were accepted unless a significant route deviation was apparent and could not be explained. In that case, the interview response was deleted from analysis. The total number of customers at the five sites during the interviews was 639. Of that total, 461 customers, or 72%, were interviewed, and only 25 re -wee deed as ho'rc irt.,alid- �c- ITE JOURNAL/JULY 1987 43 cess ratio good in light of the quick -stop nature of this type of store. Findings Site Characteristics Based on information from the yellow pages of the Billings, Montana, tele- phone directory, under "Grocers Retail," and from field observations, we plotted 26 convenience markets with gas pumps on a map. The dominant chain names were: Superette, Express Mart, E-Z Shoppe, Kwik Way, Ouik Mart, Super - America, and Speedy Mart. All stores were located along arterial streets. Twenty-one stores were located at inter - Table 1. Site Characteristics sections, and 14 were located at signal- ized intersections. Closeness to the interstate inter- change was a factor for 25% of the listed stores. Most stores were located on the major arterials intercepting the com- muter traffic, with high trip generation peaks corresponding to the commuter traffic. Eighty-eight percent of the stores were located in commercial areas. Only three were isolated within a dominant residential district serving as a neigh- borhood grocery and commuter inter- ceptor The average convenience market in Billings has about 2,100 square feet of gross floor area and has eight gasoline pumps. Site Major Adjacent Street Minor Adjacent Street 'Intersection Control 1 Principal arterial Collector Signal Five lanes —no parking, Two lanes —parking both two way (flush center sides, two way left -turn lane) 1984 AADT = 20,000 1984 AADT = 5,500 2 Principal arterial Local STOP control Four lanes —no parking, Two lanes —parking both on local two way street 1984 AADT = 22,000 1984 AADT = 1,500 3 Principal arterial Local STOP control Six lanes with left -turn Two lanes —no parking on local pockets in raised two way street median, no parking, two way 1984 AADT = 2,000 1984 AADT = 25,000 4 Principal arterial Local Signal Six lanes with left -turn Two lanes —parking both pockets in raised sides, two way median, no parking, two way 1984 AADT = 2,000 1984 AADT = 28,000 5 Principal arterial Local Signal Four lanes with left -turn Two lanes —no parking pockets in raised median, no parking, two way 1984 AADT = 13,500 Table 2. Trip Generation at Convenience Stores with Gas Pumps Site Access Characteristics At the five sites surveyed, 40% to 50% of the trips entering the site entered from the main street. Where there is a non - mountable median, it is obvious that all these trips will be right -turn entrances. A smaller percentage, 20% to 40%, ex- ited onto the main street. Twenty-five to 35% of the trips approached the site on the minor street away from the arterial, and a similar percentage exited the site away from the main street. Sixty percent to 80% of the site exits took place on the minor street. As the sites are small and there is a high peak factor, situations with conflicts at the driveways, particu- larly with left -turn ingress and left -turn egress, can be very hazardous. The sit- uation was worse at sites with no access control (no curb, gutter, sidewalks) on the side street. Trip Generation All of the surveyed sites had similar layouts and a building size between 1400 and 2400 square feet of gross floor area (Table 2). The following independent variables were analyzed using linear regression to determine their correlation (Table 3) to the observed trip generation: • Gross square feet of building • Number of gasoline pumps • Total traffic adjacent to the site • Distance to the central business dis- trict (CBD) Each of these variables proved to have a poor correlation to trip generation (R = .22 to .09) except for the distance to the CBD that had a correlation coef- ficient (RI) equal to 0.902, with the higher trip generation being closer to the CBD. It is noted, however, that distance to the CBD is not recommended for use in estimating trip generation, as this var- iable is not site related, and this specific correlation to trip generation would not apply to other cities. Traffic volume surveys were done dur- Site Trip Generation Square Feet Number of Distance from CBD Location 3 Hours Sum AADT of Building Gas Pumps (Feet) 1 Broadwater-16th St. W 345 25,500 2,400 6 2 Broadwater-1st St. W 493 23,500 1,789 6 12,900 3 Main —Logan 200 27,000 2,100 6 3,900 4 Main —Milton 281 30,000 2,400 6 16,200 5 Ken's Interstate 206 13,500 1,357 14,500 10 12,500 44 ITE JOURNAL/JULY 1987 ing the morning, noon, and evening peak hours for all five sites, and at one site a traffic count was conducted for the entire 16 hours of operation on average week- days. To estimate average weekday trip generation, the store managers were Table 3. Correlation Factors Distance to CBD = x y=a,x+ao y = — 0.0225 x + 573.39 RZ = 0.813 R = 0.902 Square Feet of Building = x y=a,x+ao y = — 0.0241 + 368.28 RZ = 0.0088 R = .094 Sum ADDT = x y=a,x+a, y = 4.4926 x + 213.05 RZ = 0.00486 R = .220 Number of Pumps = x y=410.98x— 12.42 RZ = 0.0387 R = A96 asked to estimate the percentage of their business done during the three peak hours of an average day. They estimated that 25% of their business was done dur- ing those hours. The 16-hour traffic count was also analyzed, and it was found that 24% of the daily trips were during the three peak hours for that count. Table 4 summarizes the average trip generation rates that were found per site. Figure 1 shows the results of the 16- hour site traffic count. It is recommended that trip generation for convenience mar- kets with gasoline pumps be estimated per site within the range of 800 to 2,000 vehicle trips per site on an average weekday taking into account the site lo- cation, site characteristics, the adjacent street characteristics, and traffic vol- umes. Origin/Destination As part of the interviews with cus- tomers, data were collected on the pur- pose of the other ends of the conven- ience market trips. The majority of morning trip origins are home based, and the majority of trip destinations are to work. This is not surprising and re- flects a large number of last-minute con- venience store stops in the morning on the way to work. The origins and desti- nations during the noon hour were evenly split between home and work trips. One location near an interstate in- terchange did show a large percentage (35%) of 'other" origins, with the major- ity of its noon destinations going to work (44%) and home (30%). At all the surveyed locations but one, the evening trip purpose was the oppo- site of the morning trip purpose. The ma- jority of the trips originated at work and Table 4. Average Trip Generation per Site Time Period Trip Ends Range Morning peak hour 95 42-146 Noon peak hour 96 57-165 Evening peak hour 130 86-209 Weekday 1,300 800-2,000 Based on five surveyed sites in Billings, Montana. Don't pull your hair out ... We have the motors that you need! To Fit: Eagle Signal Marbelite Crouse -Hinds Kentron Econolite/GE Automatic Signal • Motors to fit your every need. • Quick service ... low, low prices! • Motors for dial units, camshafts, flashers, coordinators and synchrolizers. PEr k GENERAL TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT CORP. 218Willow Street • Yonkers, NY 10701 • (914)965-9292 Ask about our other fine traffic control products! ITE JOURNAL/DULY 1987 45 ended at home. At the location that did not have a majority of evening trip des- tinations terminating at home, the site location was along a major suburban ar- terial with other shopping/services land uses nearby. The majority of trip desti- nations from this site (60%) fell into the "other" category. Trip Range The range of the trips to and from the convenience market was plotted for each site. The two scales used to plot range were miles and minutes. The ranges se- lected for plotting were 0.5, 1, and 2 miles; and 2, 4, and 6 minutes. Analysis of the range data indicates that 50% to 60% of trips are less than 2 miles or 6 minutes. Also, a large number of trips Table 5. Trip Type: Summary of 5 Sites Morning Peak Trip Type Average Range originate within one mile of the conven- ience market. As would be expected, the location at the interstate interchange at- tracted much longer trips than the down- town or suburban locations. Trip Type The determination of trip type was one of the primary objectives of our study. By identifying the trip type (i.e., primary, di- verted link, or nondiverted link) we could estimate the impact of convenience mar- kets with gas pumps on the transporta- tion system. The same interview method had been used to study trip type at re- gional shopping centers.' These data were of interest to the committee for use in quantifying claims that convenience markets draw entirely, or at least to a -centage of Total Traffic Noon Evening Peak Average Range Average Range Primary 6 0-10 13 9-17 13 5-21 Diverted linked 30 12-38 25 14-33 25 9-34 Nondiverted linked 64 58-85 62 50-70 62 55-83 Figure 1. Site traffic generation: 16-hour convenience market with gas pumps. large extent, on existing traffic on the street system and do not generate traffic. Our study found that, in fact, over 60% of the trips were nondiverted linked trips. Diverted linked trips accounted for an- other 25% to 30%, and primary trips ac- counted for only 10% to 15%, on aver- age. The trip type percentages were fairly constant over the three peak hours of the day studied. Table 5 presents the average trip type percentages for the three peak hours. Conclusions This report presents the findings of a study of trip characteristics of conven- ience markets with gas pumps in Bill- ings, Montana. The findings presented should be used with judgment. Billings has 110,000 persons in the metropolitan area, which is characterized by urban sprawl and a heavily car -oriented com- munity. Trip characteristics may be quite different in larger cities where more pub- lic transportation is available and where more pedestrian traffic occurs. Also, convenience markets in Montana are al- lowed to sell beer and wine. Trip char- acteristics may be different where laws restrict the sale of alcoholic beverages, or where convenience markets do not have gasoline pumps. References 1. Slade, Louis J., and Gorove, Frederick E. "Re- ductions in Estimates of Traffic Impacts of Regional Shopping Centers." ITE Journal Vol. 51, No. 1, Jan- uary 1981, pp. 16-18. 1 The data contained in this report reflect the findings and views of the Montana Technical Committee. The contents do not have the approval of, nor are they necessarily the views of, the Intermoun- tain Section, the Institute of Transporta- tion Engineers Technical Council, or the Institute of Transportation Engineers In- ternational Board of Direction. Members of the Montana Technical Committee of the Intermountain Section of ITE who participated in this project are: Robert Marvin, chairman; Leon Howe; Ken Behling; James Fells; Gary Huttmann; Richard Jacobson; Pierre Jomini; Chad Lutey; H. Terry Smith; and Pat Vandelf. 46 ITE JOURNAL/JULY 1987 CITY OF SOUTH HURLINGTON S I TF PLAN APPI, I CATION 1) OWNER OF RFCORD (name, address, phone # ) --_� �-7 -ww __-- ���1 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #)_ i4,15- 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #)_-_ 4 ) . PROJECT STREET ADDRESS : ?,'9Y 'Int -4�cc��c'{-�aJ `/u�,( ��p�d �1,��le/ 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE (S)/��`U C,Ur!/1f3L`i2LL�/y%�J C'fi✓2CJ�S ��/�GaiS/i:� 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 9).LOT COVERAGE: building %; landscaped areas 5� % building, parking, outside storage % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ , Landscaping S Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ 11 ) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: de-, 4s /��hr, L C- 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon_—; 12-1p.m. _ ; 1-2 p.m. 2-3 3-4 P.M. — _ ; 4-5 p.m. ; 5-6 p.m._ 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: SUBMISSION - SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE OF DATE OF HEARING PLANNING COMMI SON 1 DECEMBER 198t page 4 The Planning Commission recognizes a iah traffic location. The CoffH should be made to manage access in duce delays ai it or deia road. It is largely recogn zi e for managing access are: -7� o limiting the lef , urns o a the maximum width driveways; by r�eg�u__ a in a maximum un m e solidatin access with adjacent _- g to side streets a are serve this segment of Williston Rd:-as- r to reauce accidents, r� y the premature oosoiescence of the cf-tha�--the most effi6Tlve�ec�iniques limit e numUer off" con i_cct point' 'few Select locations and regu arin, o separate basic conflict area r of driveways per property, con - proper ies and re-orienTing access V signalized inersec ions. The Planning Commission endorses these methods and holds access management as a oal ex�ressea in the 19ri5 South Burlington - om- re ensive Plan to ameliorate exissting problems, provide for future growth and maintaisafety and adequate eve s or service. page - In lightof this goal e Commission finds that: a) The two Williston Road driveways shown on the plan will not ad- e5uatelv prevent or discourage lent turns since they are not Suf- ficien 'y angle an T are too wide, measuring 55 feeta the angle anfeet at the ro er tine . T he South •Burlington wing regulations allow one drivewaV per lot. (Section a b) The projected number of pea-c hour trip ends as presented in the traffic- s u Z by North'ounce annin avidSpitz letter 578'7) is between an . This high 'ic use will seriously ai'1'ecT e operation of the nearest in ersec ion sy in errup ing -a i� c flow at a distance of a roximatelyfeet from the inters ion. This interruption affects e safety anwelfare of i�Fe citizens of S. Burlington and the vehicles andpedestrians on the road. Furthermore in that the Planning Commission is attempting to plan fora possible future City Streeto the east or west of this par- cel o serve u ure evelo men on e proper y to the tote Planning Commission requested a e plan show a future access to the east and westproperties or how such an access might e accoia- ::ioaa e on t_ e�i site. The plans show no such access. ere ore, e plans are inadequate and incomp_e e. The South Burlington PlanninC. Commission herebv denies the plan. Mrs. Maher seconded. The motion .<o deny passed unanimously. 3. Site Plana lication of John Larkin for approval of a 20,000 sq. ft. office building, o Harbor View R site plan expired Fe ruary 5. 1987 Sue Dimmick noted the objections of the Agency of Natural Resources have been withdrawn and the Act 250 permit is now being issued. There are only minor changes to the plan: the parking has been pulled away from the top of the bank and there has been a slight change in curbcuts. Planning Gommi ssi cn June 14, 1'308 Page 3 2. the plan shall be revised to show the following: a. Qorreot location of the sewer main b. a depressed Curb across the driveway c. method of handling storm water cc site d. name and address of person oreoarina plan e. hydrant locations 3. Fovised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner and City Engineer for approval prior to permit. 4. The aisle width between the rows of parked cars shall be increased from 22 feet to 24 feet. 5. The building permit shall be obtained within six months or this approval is null and void. It. Burgess seconded and the most i ion passed Unanimously. It was noted that on the previous application the Vmmission neglected to ask: Mr. f >:d to i show the hydrant locations. He agreed to do s D at this time. 4. Site Plan app 1 i c at i cn of Cumber 1 and Farms for a 3X:xr:, square f c•-A convenience store with 4 gas pumps, 974 Shelburne Road. Mr. Spitz spoke for the applicant. Mr. Steven Winters was present for Cluber1and Farms. Mr. Spitz pointed out the location cc Shelburne Road. He said that currently there are gas pLunps in the right-of-way and a h4_rgan Store Cn---w Cumberland Farms? just behind it. They are proposing to tear down the current building and build a new S&C square foot building with a canape over 3 double sided gas pumps. The canopy would meet the set backs and be 50 feet back: from the property line and the building even further back: from that. He said that some of the residences and the Bank of Vermont next door have been very concerned about filling the back of the property. He pointed out that the jog in the building is to meet the set banAs where the residential zone starts. The back: portion of the property is border by residences. They are proposing to build a fence to protect the bank: and the neighbors cc the same side as the bank:. They will also add plantings for screening. Mr. Spitz said that in the front o �f the building they are going from 0 green space to creating 44% greenspaoe. Mrs. Maher asked for an explanation of oar circulation. Mr. Spit explained that there would be •one entrance/exit and one exit only for a total of two curb outs. The great majority of traffic will be entering from the south. Cars going north will be using the north exit. Mrs. Maher asked how this northerly exit would be shaped to discourage oars from entering. Mr. Spitz said that they had angled it and made it only F'1 ann i ng i nmmi ssi ,_, j' Ane 14, 1'98S F'age 4 16 feet wide. He said that a left (south) turn is very difficult from this location and he doubted that any oar would try to come in this exit. Mrs. FUrd said that she wasn't as concerned with this exit as she was with the entrance where cars exiting from Bagel Bakery would have to traverse the lane of oars entering from the south. Mr. Spitz said that there was room for two cars going in either direction to stack plus there was room on the Bagel Bakery lost for oars to wait. It was noted that the Bagel Bakery also has an exit onto Laurel Hill Drive. Mr. Spitz said that the Bagel Bakery has a lost of traffic at noon but the morning and evening peak: hour traffic isn't as great. Mr. Spitz noted that the current situation with the gas pumps in the right-of-way was far more dangerous. The strip between the two properties is a combined right-of- way. Mrs. Maher asked Mrs. Lafleur if it would be safer if there was a concrete divider between the entrance land and the two exiting lanes. Mrs. Lafleur did not think it would be possible as cars would have to make a wider swing which might make interfere with other oar movements. Mr. spitz also noted that the large gas trucks have to be able to get in. A painted divider was discussed but most felt that it wouldn't be seen most of the year. Mr. Winter said that he didn't think: a barrier would be allowed in the right—of-way. Mrs. Maher asked why the driveway was not exactly cif the property line. Mr. Spitz said that they were trying to give some leeway to the Bagel Bakery parking tot. Mrs. Peacock: asked how many pUurps were existing. Mr. Spitz said there were two pumps each capable � �two f servicing twcars at the same time (A total?. They were expanding to 3 pumps able to service 6 cars at one time. Mrs. Hurd asked if there was enough parking. Mrs. Lafleur said that they were required to have 23 but they were showing 19. This was because they were trying to preserve some of the buffer area in the rear. Mr. Spitz said that with this type � �f business most of the people park: in front and do "quick: stop" shopping. Mr. Jacobs asked what they would be selling now that wasn't there now. Mr. Winter said that it was more of the same type of product that is there now. Mr. Jacobs said that whenever he had stopped at the current store there is always people there but never enough to fill 1' parking spaces. Mr. Winter noted that in some towns this type of business is al 1 owed to count the gas pLunps as parking spaces. Everyone agreed that 19 spaces would be enough for now. Mrs. Lafleur asked Mr. Winter if he felt they had enough parking spaces up front. Mr. Winter said that in order to get more parking Up front they would have to push the building further back: which would mean making it smaller. He felt that there would not be a problem because all the area around the building was paved so there will be ample place to park. Mrs. li-trd asked about the lighting in the rear. Mr. Winter pointed out the lights under the canopy and the location of the lights in the rear. Nest commissioners felt that the lighting in the rear should be the down oast type to eliminate as mush as passible shining into the Planning i ;:(mission June 14, 1S@8 Page 5 neighbors backyards. Mr. Winters noted that the pales were 20 feet and would be downcast. Mrs. Lafleur noted that this type was called cut—off 1 Muni nar i es. Mrs. Lafleur said that they met the required amount cc landscaping but that the trees were of very small caliper. Mrs. Maher said that whatconcerned her more than the size was the kinds of shrubbery. She would like t� � see more Vermont hardy varieties. Mrs. Lafleur said that front yard coverage did not meet the requirement. She said that across the street a waiver was given for the Abil station because it was such a vast improvement over what was there. She said that on the ether hand the Commission had turned dawn other applications for not having enough front yard coverage. Mrs. Maher asked what the percentage was. Mrs. Lafleur said that they were going from 0 to 40% front yard greenspace. Mr. Spitz said that they had changed their design to accommodate set back: variances and to add as much greenspace as they could without pushing the building back into the residential zone. He felt that it would be "real tong" to get anymore as this was such a narrow lot. Mrs. Lafleur said that the two driveways certainly made a difference. Mr. Belter felt that there was an additional hardship because of the 30 foot right of way. A poll of the i rrrmission shcwed that most felt they would accept this because of the improvements s being done. Mrs. Lafleur said that the traffic overlay allows 18 trip ends. She said that this would generate 47 trip ends (peak: hour). She read the zoning document which gives the itmmission authority to waive the standard if other site improvements, such as change and reductions of the number of curb cuts is present. Mrs. Maher asked why they were being allowed to increase the pumps to 6 from 4. Mr. Winter said that they were locking to be competitive with the station across the street that has 12 pumps. He felt that they were hoping to lure in oars coming from the south. He said that if there were 4 pLQDS and cars had to stack: that would be less safe than if they could pull up under the canopy. Mrs. Maher said that she could not in god conscience vote for this number of mums_ Mr. Spitz said that during the peak: hours you would find oars staying cc which ever side of the road they were on. He felt the key was to make the ins and cuts as safe as passible. Mr. Purgess said that he didn't think: this business would generate any traffic which wasn't already going by. Mr. Winter said that he didn't think anyone would cca)e out during peak: hour traffic just to go to this stare. Mrs. HLyd asked what would happen to the traffic figures if one PUMP was removed. Mr. Spitz said that he didn't think: it would make a one third difference. Mrs. Lafleur said that she didn't have the figure. She felt it would generate an i nc r ease over what is there now because it is a better known store with a good reputation. Mrs. Maher said that she felt 4 pcunps was sufficient. Mr. Burgess said that he felt people were going to go here whether there was a line or not. Mrs. Hurd asked what kind of business could go in there that would only generate 18 trip in per peak hour. Mrs. Lafleur said that a small office might qualify. Mr. Jacobs said Planning Cnami ssi ion June 14, wee Page 6 that they could leave what was there which all agreed was not the safest plan. Mrs. Lafleur asked Mr. Winter if he could live with less pumps. Mr. Winter said that he felt that would be unsafe as cars would be waiting for gas and blocking the entrance. Mrs. Hurd said she felt that the question was not one of the number of pumps but if this was the right business for this location. Mrs. Maher said that since there was a gas station there now the city is stuck with one. Mr. Burgess said that he would reluctantly agree with this number Of pUunps considering the improvements the city is getting to this lot. Mr. Belter agreed. Mrs. Peacock: said that she would prefer to see one less purtps. She felt that it would increase a fair amount over what is there now. Mrs. Hurd said she would allow 3 because as she felt it would be a much safer situation. Mrs. Hurd asked why parking spaces 1 and 2 were facing in the direction they were. Mr. Spitz said that Ciunberland Farms wanted as many spaces in front as possible. Mr. Jacobs asked why they weren't flipped perpendicular to what was shown. After much discussion it was decided that the spaces would be left as shown but that the handicapped space would be placed on the other side of the door. Mrs. Lafleur said that Fire Chief Goddette wanted the canopy to be at least 14 feet high for fire truck: access. Mrs. Lafleur said that Mr. Saymansk:i wanted the sidewalk: to be continuous across the front of the lot over all driveways. Mrs. Hurd noted that the K pster was screened which was another improvement. Mrs. Hurd moved that the South Ewlington Planning commission approve the site plan application Of Ctvnberland Farms for demolition � �f existing building and construction of a Cx=x=C; square foot convenience store with 3 gas pLurps to serve 6 veh i c l es at one time at 974 Shelburne Fred as depicted on a plan entitled "974 Shelburne Fred, South Burlington, Vermont CLunberland Farms: prepared by Civnberland Farms. Canton. Massao huset t s. " dated March 19t h . 1987, last revised May 27. 1988 with the following stipulations: 1. The landscaping plan shall be revised to show more hardy Vermont varieties and larger sizes. A $5850 landscaping bond shall be posted pricy to permit. 2. Nineteen parking spaces shall be constructed, four are waived of the required 23 spaces. The handicapped space shall be relcm-ated from parking space # 3 to space marked #1 on the plan 3. Sidewalks shall be shown on the plans and shall be continuous across driveways. 4. A storm water rLnC--ff plan shall be approved by the City Engineer pricy to permit. Planning i ommi ssi on June 14, ISM Page 7 5. A drop inlets as needed shall be added in the vacant area in the east and piped along the northern boundary to Shelburne Read and plans approved by the City Engineer prior to permit. 6. All lights in the rear parking lot will be cut Off lLuninar, down cast to minimize shining in the existing residential zone. 7. Hydrants shall be shown cn the plan. B. The lowest paint of the canopy shall be a minimum Of 14 feet in height. 9. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 meths cc this approval is null and void. Mr. BL Bess seconded and the mc,ticn passed 4 t 2 with Mr. Belter, Mr. Ek-tr Bess, Mr. Jacobs and Mrs. Hurd v� �t i ng for and Mrs. Maher and Mrs. Peac c•c k vot i ng against. Mrs. Maher requested that the minutes show that she voted against the plan simply because of the number Of Pt_imps. 5. Site plan application � �f Corol and Ali Tahami for conversion of building to retail use for New England imported Figs, 9D) shelburne Rccad. Ms. Ann Vivian spoke for the applicant. She said that she had drawn the site plan changing this building from office space to retail use. The location was on the east side of Shelburne Road next to the Lindenwcad. She said that there were very few changes from what existed. They would change one part of lawn to gravel to allow for a van to unload carpets. Mr. Jacobs asked if there was room for a truck:. Mr. Tahami said that he owns a van in which he goes to Massachusetts to get his carpets. There are no other delivery trucks. Mrs. Lafleur said that they were required to have 6 parking spaces but that she didn't think: they would need that many S she enc uraged them not to pave all of them unless they felt they were needed. Mrs. Vivian noted that the gravel was over a wider area than they needed sc, they would be regrassing some of it. Mrs. Lafleur said that the only other issue was traffic. This lot is allowed 4 trip ends and she didn't think they would generate that much. Mrs. Maher asked what assurances the city has that nothing else will take place in this building. Mrs. Lafleur said that they would have to get a multiple use permit from the Zoning Bcerd. She also said that the ilcmnission could stipulate this. TELEPHONE MEMO Name: VCe-L WAF-1-ro Date: !!f/Z.O I a 9' Contact: 'Dick- WAMMIQ Subject neo OJmaOwAt,z oK Ige --ram-- %,e4 C17 Ja 4010 Ace 00 -'Ark Signature Citvof South Bill- ington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 March 14, 1989 David Spitz 16 Clover Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05453 Dear David: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find your copy of Findings of Fact. If you have any questions please call me. Sincerely, Joe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) CGt�'l�(.�C�yS 7 7 S" Can Ivel, A4 _ 2) APPLICANT ( name, address, phone 3) CONTACT PERSON (name,, address, 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 5) LOT NUMBER (.if applicable)_ 6) PROPOSED USE(S) phone #) !/L r A01VA ss D56a le 1. 8 �� -0- 11 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) 3 003 . m - C/ V ve- le-1 6S -- 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES_ 9) LOT COVERAGE: building _6—%; landscaped areas % building, parking, outside storage_% 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ Landscaping $1011*'300 Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 1 2) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) --/-- - _ Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following�urs: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-lp.m._ _ 1-2 p.m. ; 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m.-----; 4-5 p.m. --- --� 5-6 p.m. ; 6-7 p.m.---- 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 1 4) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION : _-_ DAT, O SUBMISSION SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATt O HEARING �l PLEASE SUBMIT FOUR COPIES OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible.) Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. Existing and proposed curbcuts, pavement, walkways. Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to of greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' x 18') with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required. Number and location of compact car spaces. ( This requires separate Planning Commission approval). Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. (13 feet by 20 feet in size, one per every fifty spaces) Location of septic tanks (if applicable). Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Building footprint, building, parking and outside storage, and landscaped areas. Location of site (Street # and lot #). North arrow. Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. 2 �Gs� �� �� ,C � s' were Installed ry lines are rglass below above ground. WENT isol Ine isollne _ csoline :tlon wells :Ion.) LLJ O CV CV CV PrA i3 o c� i o EE `V cD �- Y U (V exist. Birch trees to remain N 67- 14' W proposed 6' stockade fence 173.15' /L ,—asphalt pavement---, � I 06 co �7 asphalt berm, N 670 12' W 5.07' — exl; PLANT ING SDfDJLE SYMBOL NAME (SPECIES) No. SIZE o PLANTING MATURE SIT ONorway Maple (Acer Platanoldes) 4 2' caliper - 8' high 50' high, 40' spread Arborvitae ftja Occidentalls) 3 1-112' caliper - 6' high 40' high, 20' spread Flowering Crab Ntlus) 7 1-1/2' caliper - 6' high 20' high, 25' spread Forsythia (Intwm8dlaspetabllls) 16 15' - 18' high 4' - 6' high Rhododendron (Carounianrm 21 24' - 36' high 6' - 8' high O Azaela 16 12' - 18' high 24' - 36' high Apanese Yew (Taxus Cuspldata) 58 18' - 24' high 36' - 48' high a 4 QQ . los k a I & -'P(00 0 (o . !0 3 !VSORea. GREEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS 1 TOTAL WEEN SPACE REQUIRED: 301 green space required - 14.544.73 s.f. TOTAL G EEN SPACE PROVIDED: 23.840.09 s.f. - 50.832 TOTAL•1 GIEEN SPACE REWIRED: 1 1 ft. x 16626 :V TOTAL FRONT YARD GREEN SPACE PROVIDED: • m'.0 :. R�\/IS June 30, 1987 Jul 13, 1987 July 14, 1987 Jul 14, 1987 September 81987 February 8, 8 198, 198 March 14. 8 March 23. 1988 Louth Nurlingt>an Nire Department 575 Bnrset #treet #nutli N urlingtnn, Vermont 05401 1 OFFICE OF 'JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658.7960 `1 E M O R A N D l: M 110: South Burlinaton Planning Commission From: James Goddette, Fire Chief' Re: June 14, 1988 agenda items Date: June 10, 1988 :1) COOLEY WOOD CORPORAT I O\ , BELTER PARK. LO'r » 1 5 At this time i do not see a problem with this bui ldina aiid paarkins4 layout but: more information is needed on tocatir)n of hydrant system. 4) TOP SHOP - COOLY --WOOD CORPORATION LOT t16 E'1'H_AN A1.L1•'\ DRIVE* Plans reviewed and the following is required: a) Road way between parking area roust be at least 30' wide. b) Information is needed on hydrant location on its new Belt:.er Road lot, .line. 5) C UMBERLAND FARMS_, 9 i � 5}Ir:L,BI'lt Plans reviewed by the Fire Depar. tmont. and r,ho 1'o i i o�i: -,iii i:is h(lon found i:hich need to be corrected: a) Canopy must, be at. least, 1 4' h i. L:.h I.o \•ehicle if needed, 6) AL. I '1 AHAMI i 930 SHELBURNE ROAD At th i F, time I do not see any prob l -nis with 1 h i s j)rO.jt,c t . City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 June 10, 1988 David Spitz 16 Clover Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05453 Re: Cumberland Farms, 974 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Spitz: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the agenda and my memo to the Plannins4 Commission. Also enclosed are comments from Bill Szymanski and }ire Chief Goddette. Please be sure someone is present on 'Tuesday, June 14, at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encl.s cc: Cumberland Farms M E M O R A N D U My/` To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: June 14, 1988 agenda items Date: June 10, 1988 2) and 3) COOLEY-WOOD CORPORATION, IOT #15 AND IOT #16BELTER. INDUSTRIAL PARK 1. Sewer main is not at location shown on the plan. 2. Plan should show depressed curb across driveway so that the builder is aware of that requirement. 3. Plan should show who prepared it especially for future reference. 4. Plan must show method of handling storm water from the site. 4) CUMBERLAND FARMS, SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Sidewalks across driveways shall remain in place. Plan shows them removed. 2. Plan must show method of handling the storm water run-off. 3. There exists a drainageway along the northerly boundary that drains a large area to the east. This drainageway must be maintained. 1 would recommend a drop inlet or two be added in vacant area to the east and piped along the north boundary to Shelburne Road. 5) ALI TAHAMI, 930 SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Plan should show storm water run-off especially in area of new parking spaces. I TO: FROM: RE: DATE: 2. r tuutb Nurltngtnn Ntre Department 575 Mornet #treet #nub Surlingtnn, Vermont 05401 SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF JAMES W. GODDETTE TUESDAY MAY 17,1988 AGENDA ITEMS MAY 10,1988 CUMBERLAND FARM INC. 974 SHELBURNE ROAD NEW BUILDING STORE ,1 OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658-7960 to\ m N PLANS WERE REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME MY ONLY CONCERN IS THE CANOPY OVER THE PUMPS MUST BE AT LEAST +Wi0Ro�-C 14' HIGH TO ALLOW EQUIPMENT UNDER IT IF NEEDED. 2t50 BAIRD CTR. PROPERTY 533 Q.C.P. ROAD BROOKSIDE COMMONS PLANS REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND THE FOLLOWING IS NEEDED FOR FIRE PROTECTION: A. AT TWO (2) HYDRANTS INSTALLED AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT B. THE ROAD BETWEEN THE ISLAND AND PARKING AREA MUST BE 30' WIDE TO ENABLE OUR EQUIPMENT TO SET UP. 6/13/88 JBL MOTION OF APPROVAL vt-XV1,11� <AA\X a MP-yAmur(\ I move that the Pla ring Commission approve the site plan application of Cum erland Farms for demolition of existing building and const ction of a 3003 square foot convenience store with�}� gas pumps at 974 Shelburne Road as depicted on a plan entitled "974 Shelburne Road", South Burlington, Vermont Cumberland Farms" prepared by Cumberland Farms, Canton, Massachusetts," dated March 19, 1987, last revised May 27, 1988 with the following stipulations: 1) A $5850 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. 2) Nineteen parking spaces shall be constructed' four are waived of//.� the required 23 spaces. 3 )lJ�'Sidewalks shall be shown on the plans and shall continue ^' across driveways 4) A stormwater runoff plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to permit. Ot1e o r't-,�O 5) ;T- drop inlet Or"'twshall be added in the vacant area in the east and piped along the northern boundary to Shelburne Road and plans approved by the City Engineer prior to permit. 5)) The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. &-kn - No NJNX� e5 - No Memorandum - Planning June 10, 1988 Page 3 5) CUMBERLAND FARMS, 974 SHELBURNE ROAD Cumberland Farms proposes to construct a 3003 square foot convenience store with 4 gas pumps on the 1.11 acre property at 974 Shelburne Road This property is zones Commercial One and is the former Morgan Stores property .just north of the Bagel Bakery. Access: Access is shown from two curb cuts on Shelburne Road. The northern one is a 14 foot wide exit only; the southern driveway is 36 feet wide and serves as a shared driveway with the Bagel Bakery property. A right-of-way is located along the southern property line to serve parcels to the east. Circulation: The plan shows a 28 foot wide aisle along the northern side of the building and circulation on three sides of the building. See Goddette's comments regarding fire access. Parking: Twenty three parking spaces are required based on 15% retail or 2252 square feet of food store. The plan shows 114 parking spaces. Five are located in front of the building. The rest. are behind the building. This waiver should be approved since a number of existing birch would have to be removed to provide more parking. Landscaping: The proposed development requires $5850 in new landscaping. The plan shows a new landscaped island in the front and landscaping in the rear as well as along the northern property line. It is valued at the required amount although many of the plantings are small. n v' Coverage: An earlier plan was denied by the ZBA since front yard coverage was paved within not brought into conformance the front yard setback. (70% landscaped and :30% This new plan shows a O�- significant coverage to improvement from the existing 100% front yard 59% paved and 41% green. In the past., we have approved a gas station plan (Mobil) thatimproved a front >ard coverage situation and we have denied a plan based on covernize �� (as well as on other items). Front yard coverage seems very difficult to achieve when the lots are narrow and two driveways are shown which is typical for gas stations. Traffic: This 1.11 acre property allows 18 trip endue. The proposed use will ,generate approximately 47 tripends during tilt, peak hour. The use is already existing although the traffic will probably increase over present volumes due to the appeal of the specific business. The access changes should improve tilt, safety of entering and exiting the property. 41e(\4a VZW --0 tove-6L fie to ftw 3�G n \P1C�4 . �(1 Va�tXY12 . Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. — City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 June 21, 1988 David Spitz 16 Clover Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05453 Re: Cumberland Farms Dear Mr. Spitz: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the June 14, 1988 Planning Commission minutes. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jajlu� Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp cc: Cumberland Farms