Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 0977 Shelburne Road
y .��VERMONT State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Agency of Natural Resoterces WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A. Chapter 64, Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective September 29, 2007 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective April 25, 2005 Permit Number: WW-4-3273 Landowner: Jolley Associates PO Box 671 St Albans VT 05478 This permit affects property identified as Town Tax Parcel ID # South Burlington: 1540-00577 and referenced in deeds recorded in Book 216 Page 320 of the Land Records in South Burlington, Vermont. This project, consisting of an after the fact approval for the existing convenience store with five islands of gasoline pumps and no on -premise food preparation located at 977 Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. 1.GENERAL 1.1 The project shall be completed as shown on the application, plans and/or documents prepared by Erik C. Sandblom, P.E. for ESPC, with the stamped plans listed as follows: Sheet.Number Title Plan Date SP-1 Jolley Associates - Shelburne Road 3/19/09 1.2 The project shall not deviate from the approved plans in a manner that would change or affect the exterior water supply or wastewater disposal systems, building location, or, the approved use of the building, without prior review and written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 1.3 This permit does not relieve the landowner from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 25o District Environmental Connnission, the Department Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety— telephone (802) 879-2300, the Department of Health — telephone (802) 863-7221, and local officials prior to proceeding with this project. 1.4 The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the landowner and all assigns and successors in interest. The landowner shall be responsible for the recording of this permit in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (3o) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. 1.5 Each prospective purchaser of the lot shall be shown copies of the Wastewater System And Potable Water Supply Permit, and the approved plans. 1.6 By acceptance of this permit, the landowner agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations. 1.7 In issuing this permit, the Division has relied upon the licensed designer's certification that the design - related information submitted was true and correct, and complies with the Vermont Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules and the Vermont Water Supply Rules. This permit may be revoked if it is determined that the project does not comply with these Rules. Regional Offices — Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury Wastewater System and Potable W. ) Supply Permit / WW-4-3273 Page 2 of 2 1.8 Any person aggrieved by this permit may appeal to the Environmental Court within 3o days of the date of issuance of this permit in accordance with io V.S.A. Chapter 22o and the Vermont Rules of Environmental Court Proceedings. 2.WATER SUPPLY 2.1 This permit issued by the Secretary is valid for a substantially completed potable water supply based upon a certification from a designer that states: a. "I hereby certify that in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment the installation - related information submitted is true and correct and the potable water supply was installed in accordance with: the permitted design and all permit conditions; or record drawings and such record drawings are in compliance with the applicable rules, were filed with the Secretary, and are in accordance with all other permit conditions; was inspected; was properly tested; and has successfully met those performance tests." 2.2 This project is approved for connection to the South Burlington municipal water system as depicted on the approved plans. The project is approved for a maximum of i,88o gallons of water per day. No changes to the water supply shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division. 3.WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 3.1 This permit issued by the Secretary is valid for a substantially completed wastewater system based upon a certification from a designer that states: "I hereby certify that in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment the installation - related information submitted is true and correct and the wastewater system was installed in accordance with: the permitted design and all permit conditions; or record drawings and such record drawings are in compliance with the applicable rules, were filed with the Secretary, and are in accordance with all other permit conditions; was inspected; was properly tested; and has successfully met those performance tests." 3.2 This project is approved for connection to the South Burlington municipal wastewater treatment facility as depicted on the approved plans. The project is approved for a maximum of i,88o gallons of wastewater per day. No changes to the wastewater disposal system shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division. 3.3 This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their wastewater treatment facility. If the municipaLapproval expires, .and the municipality files a written request with the -_ Secretary, the Secretary will remove the sewage allocation for this project from the list of committed reserve capacity. If the municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval and does not request that the Secretary remove the sewage allocation for this project from the list of committed reserve. Once the project is removed from the list of committed reserve capacity, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an application fee will be required. The rules in effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project. Laura Q. Pelosi, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By Ernest Christianson, Regional Engineer Dated April 29, 2009 cc: South Burlington Planning Commission ESPC Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety Department of Health — Food & Lodging Licenses ,oO�, VERMONT State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation [phone] 802-879-5656 Wastewater Management Division [fax] 802-879-3871 Essex Regional Office in West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695 www.septic.vt.gov April 24, 2009 Jolley Associates PO Box 671 St Albans VT 05478 RE: WW-4-3273, Jolley Associates 2oo6 connection to municipal water and sewer, 977 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Applicant: We received your completed application for the above referenced project on April 23, 2009, including a fee of $470.00 paid by check #072569. Under the performance standards for this program, we have a maximum of 45 days of "in-house" time to review your application. If we require further information from you to make a decision, the time until we receive it is not included in the in-house performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 45 in-house days, please contact this office. We have forwarded the information contained in your application to the Information Specialist for this region. A Project Review Sheet will be sent to you indicating other state agencies and departments you should contact regarding additional permits or approvals you may need under their programs. If you have not already done so, you should also check with town officials about any necessary town permits. For the Division of Was -ater Management James Sandberg Administrative Assisiarit A cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Erik C. Sandblom Regional Offices — Barre/EssexJct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 May 7, 2003 Schreib Engineering, Inc. Egypt Road East Fairfield, VT 05448 RE: S.B. Collins Shelburne Road, South Burlington Dear Sirs: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. This Department was not notified of any changes to the project with revisions since we looked at the set of plans last revised November 18, 2002. Those plans did not show either the existing water service line or a proposed water line. The new plans I have just received now show the water line coming in from the west side of the building, after being tapped into the Hannaford Drive water main. This constitutes an extension of the City water distribution system and hence requires other changes to comply with the City of South Burlington Water Ordinance: a. The minimum pipe size shall be eight -inch (8") for the water main that will be located in the City 60'ROW. The fire sprinkler line servicing this building may be six-inch as shown on your plans. b. The new eight -inch line shall be tapped into Hannaford Drive and extended and capped at the furthest property boundary line shown on the area designated as the City 60' ROW, to allow for continuation to adjoining properties. The line shall have the cap restrained with a Mega - Lug restraining gland or approved equal, and a poured thrust block shall be installed on the end. c. The cap shall be installed on a short stub of pipe that shall extend from a new eight -inch (8") gate valve installed near the end of the pipe. d. The sprinkler line to the new building shall have an anchor tee and valve located at the point that the sprinkler line goes toward the new building, at the City ROW. e. Since this was an existing service all connection fees shall be waived. However, any new meter shall be charged the current meter fee according to our meter fee schedule. 2. All construction drawings and plans shall have a note saying "All water line and related work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems /1 I Owned by the Champlain Water District, the City of South Burlington Colchester Fire District #l, and the Village of Jericho. Please add this note to all plans in visible locations. All water installation work and water distribution material must comply with these specifications. 3. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public water system shall be protected according to their degree of hazard, with a backflow prevention assembly, and an appropriate thermal expansion system. Please contact this department for more information on backflow protection devices. 4. At this time fire sprinkler systems are assessed a $30 annual fee. 5. The SBWD shall be sent any future hard copy plans involving this project for review. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in the above referenced Specifications. 6. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, thrust blocks, appurtenances and water line crossings. 7. Further review changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. 8. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, / Jay Nadeau Superintendent CC. Janet Hurley DD. Doug Brent Plan Reviews: SB Collins, 977 Shelburne Rd CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2006 William Lawson Jolley Associates PO Box 671 St. Albans, VT 05457-0671 Re: Landscaping Escrow Release — 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lawson: Please be advised that the City of South Burlington herby releases you from the obligation to maintain $9150 in an escrow account for landscaping at 977 Shelburne Road. If you have any questions, please let me know. Since , R y nd J. B r Administrative Officer FROM : City of So. B FAX NO. : 1 e02 658 4748 )Apr. 07 2003 09:06AM P1 SITE PLAN ESCROW A�xRE�MENT T,RIS AGREEMENT, executed in triplicate by and between J�[L. /�tCtr•iz7 , hereinafter referred to as Developer", the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, hereinafter referred to as "Municipality", and the c k7) r('j%Ajyo-,L 13':a�,Z, , hereinafter referred to as "Bank" . WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has received site plan approval from the MUNICIPALITY'S Planning Commission for the development of property located at , j:/l7 `jdA�L. 3-94, 'Z r'f- rrn, , as depicted on a site plan entitled " IT dated and prepared by WHEREAS, Developer is required by said approval, at its own expense, to complete certain improvements; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement wish to establish an escrow account to secure the obligations of the Developer as set forth in the City approval; and WHEREAS, the Bank executes this Agreement solely in the capacity of escrow agent. NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. DEVELOPER will, at its own expense, complete the following construction as depicted and in accordance with the specifications set forth in said site plan and related documents: 2. The Developer shall complete the improvements set forth in Paragraph one no later than -, / 3. DEVELOPER shall replace or repair any defective or improper work or materials which may be recognized within three (3) years after completion of the improvements set forth in Paragraph one. For the purpose of this Agreement "completion" shall be deemed to have occurred when the MUNICIPALITY has inspected and approved the construction of all the improvements required by this Agreement and issued written notice to the DEVELOPER that the construction is complete. 4. For the guaranty of Developer's performance of all requirements hereinabove set forth, and prior to the issuance of any zoning permit for Developer and Bank agree that the sum o - �)/ 3"C. CL° shall be set aside and held in escrow by the Bank Post -Its Fax Note 7671 Date ems► j7 70 A 17HProm Co./Dept.I Co. FROM : City of So. B FAX NO. : 1 802 65e 4748 jApr. 07 2003 09:07AM P2 and shall be available for payment to the Municipality in accordance with the terms herein set forth. 5. If the Municipality shall file with the Bank a statement that the Developer is in the judgement of Municipality in default under the terms of this Agreement, the Bank shall from time to time pay monies from said escrow fund to the Municipality, in amounts not to exceed a total enabling the Municipality to complete improvements and requirements set forth in this Agreement. 6. The Municipality will promptly submit to the Developer a copy of such statement as it files with the Bank. The consent of the developer to such payment by the Bank to the Municipality shall not be required. The Bank shall incur no liability to the Developer on account of making such payment to the Municipality, nor shall the Bank be required to inquire into the propriety of any claim by the Municipality of default on the part of the Developer or into the use of such funds by the Municipality in completing such improvements. 7. The Municipality shall not file with the Bank a statement of default until thirty (30) days after notice has been sent by it to the Developer by certified mail, return receipt requested, setting forth its intention to do so. 8. All monies released by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to paragraph five (5) shall be used by the Municipality solely for the purpose of performing obligations imposed upon the Developer by that portion of this Agreement upon which the Developer is then in default. Any work to be performed by the Municipality pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis or shall be performed by the Municipality with its own work force and equipment or shall be accomplished in such manner as in the judgement of the Municipality shall accomplish the work most expeditiously and economically. 9. If monies are released by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to paragraph five (5) and it shall later develop that a portion of the released monies are surplus to the Municipality's needs, any such surplus shall be refunded by the Municipality to the Bank to be held and distributed by the Bank pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 10. The Bank will not refuse or delay to make such payments to the Municipality when requested by the Municipality by the appropriate statement, and Developer will not interfere with or hinder such payments by the Bank to the Municipality. Said statement shall contain a certificate of compliance with the notice requirements of paragraph seven (7) of this Agreement. 11. This Agreement shall terminate and shall be of no force or effect upon performance of all requirements contemplated hereby, and the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph three (3). 12, The sum of Z/ SG� � shall be maintained in escrow until certification to the Bank by the Municipality of the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph three (3) . K FROM City oP So. B FAX NO. : 1 802 658 4748 Apr. 07 2003 09:07AM P3 13. This Agreement shall not only be binding upon the parties hereto, but also their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. nj aE A- Dated at J A v�. v �, V r , this day of ' 1-. 17 , ,.ZAP I zap TOPER'S NAME) Tc46ay i xxa� 5 By: , Duly Authorize gent _r Dated at this o ITX OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Wthess By. �. Witness Duly Authorized ent Dated at , , this day o , 199 (NAME OF BANK - 3RD PARTY) vG By; /' 6 Wxt ess Duly Authorized ALr6nt 3 ACCOUNT NUMBER 0-00-0341570 RECEIPT FOR INITIAL DEPOSIT CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT 1 AMOUNT 9,150.00 Date : 04/07/03 Issuing Branch: ST ALBANS There has been placed on deposit at Chittenden Bank the Burn of * * * *9,1 SODollars00Cents payable to the order of JOLLEY ASSOCIATES upon surrender of this certificate, or other authorized means, properly endorsed, at any branch of Chittenden Bank at the expiration of the term (or any successive renewals) of the Certificate of Deposit. The initial term of this certificate is 365 DAYS This certificate matures on 04/06/2004 Unless you indicate otherwise, this certificate will renew automatically for the amount stated plus interest, if any, at Chittenden Bank's then prevailing interest rate. Renewal is for an identical term and is in accordance with all of the Bank's rules and regulations governing Certificates of Deposit at the time of renewal. Chittenden Bank agrees to notify the depositor(s) prior to maturity to allow a full or partial withdrawal upon the maturity date. During the initial term interest shall be at the rate of 1.090 `.Po and shall be payable by REDEPOSIT per annum rJThis is a variable rate CD. ❑ This is a variable rate IRA certificate. ❑ I do not want this certificate to automatically renWVase make it a single term certificate (7-31 day CDs must be single term). I ackn wledp receipt of the rules and re ulat1 erning this Certificate of Deposit. Customer SIgnature Customer Signature Customer Signature (No Ownership Interest) Bank Representative NOT TRANSFERABLE L_ T.I.N. CERTIFICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT NAML(S) AND COMPLETE ADDRESS JOLLEY ASSOCIATES POB 671 04/07/03 1 030267518 SAINT ALBANS VT 05478 -0671 U 1 have LN I have not been notified that I am subject to IRS direct backup withholding. ® 1 am a U.S. person (including a U.S. Resident Alien) ❑ I am a non-resident alien. ❑ I am an exempt recipient. ❑ TIN applied for. CERTIFICATION: Under the penalties of perjury, 1 certify the tax information provided on this form is true, correct Apd complete. PLEASE MAKE THN A IOINr ACCOUNT IN THE NAMES OF BURLINGTON SIGNATURE You are authorized to pay die whole or any part of the amount to either Of us. If either of us dies the money due thereon shall belong and be paid to die survivor. M1 CHECK CUSTOMER SIGNATURE CUSTOMER SIGNATURE REDEPOSIT CERTIFICATION OF FOREIGN STATUS (ALL Non -Resident Alien Signers must complete the follo%iing.) DA H . DA'rL Under penalties of perjury, I/we certify that, to the best of my/Our krtoH'ledge and belief, I/we are not a U.S. citizen(s) or resident(s), and that 1/we quality as a foreign person(s), estate or trust. I/we further certify that the information provided on this form is true, correct and complete, and that I/we have received a copy of United States Internal Revenue Service Form W-8. 1. 2 'i SIGNATURE DA'rL SIGNAWKI. DATE SIGNAI Iik I. DATI ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT 0-00-0341570 9,150.00 RECEIPT FOR INITIAL DEPOSIT CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT Date: 04/07/03 Issuing Branch: ST ALBANS There has been placed on deposit at Chittenden Bank the sum of * * * *9,150Do11ars00Cents payable to the order of JOLLEY ASSOCIATES upon surrender of this certificate, or other authorized means, properly endorsed, at any branch of Chittenden Bank at the expiration of the term (or ,any successive renewals) of the Certificate of Deposit. The initial term of this certificate is _ 365 DAYS This certificate matures on 04/06/2004 Unless you indicate otherwise, this certificate will renew automatically for the amount stated plus interest, if any, at Chittenden Bank's then prevailing interest rate. Renewal is for an identical term and is in accordance with all of the Bank's rules and regulations governing Certificates of Deposit at the time of renewal. Chittenden Bank agrees to notify the depositor(s) prior to maturity to allow a full or partial withdrawal upon the maturity date. During the initial term interest shall be at the rate of 1.090 % per annum ❑This is a variable rate CD. and shall be payable by REDEPOSIT ❑ This is a variable rate IRA certificate. ❑ I do not want this certificate to automatically rene ase make it a single term certificate (7-31 day CDs must be single term). I acknowled receipt of the rules and re ulati erning this Certificate of Deposit. Customer SIgnature Customer Signature Customer Signature (No Ownership Interest) Bank Representative NOT TRANSFERABLE T.I.N. CERTIFICATION NAME(S)AND COMPLFrEADDRESS JOLLEY ASSOCIATES POB 671 04/07/03 1 030267518 SAINT ALBANS VT 05478 -0671 ❑ I have LN I have not been notified that 1 am subject to IRS direct backup withholding. ® I am a U.S. person (including a U.S. Resident Alien) ❑ I am a non-resident alien. ❑ I am an exempt recipient. ❑ TIN applied for. CERTIFICATION: Under the penalties of perjury, I certify the tax information provided on this form is true, correct Sd complete. PLEASE MAKE THIS A JOINT ACCOUNT IN THE NAMES OF You are authorized to pay the whole or any part of the amount to either of us. If either of us dies die money due thereon shall belong and be paid to the survivor. CHECK CtISrOMER SIGNATURE CUSTOMER SIGNATURE or IWIAUI Sl, SYSTEM 1,317 REDEPOSIT CERTIFICATION OF FOREIGN STATUS ALL Non -Resident Alien Signers must complete the following.) DATE Drcrr: Under penalties of perjury, I/we certify that, to the best of my/our kru,wledge and belief, I/we are not a U.S. citizen(s) or resident(s), and that 1/we qualify as a foreign person(s), estate or trust. I/we further certify that the intOrmation provided on this firm is true, correct and complete, and that 1/we have received a copy of United States Internal Revenue Service Form W-8. I. 2. 3. SIGNATURE DATE SIGNAIULI DATE SIGNAIIlit I. DATI: MINE n,.1 A,G.✓,. y0��'! M. fit :LINES.�._ Leaa as otices leas Notices � Le�a�N®caa. Leaa Notices Leaa No®� ��tice� s le "Itof maintaining our stan- imate amounts listed be- work. tend the public ,hearing. id good taste, we reserve low: Written comments and proved planned unit de- retail, 150 seat 7500 sq. two (2) dwelling units to ancel or edit advertising at $ 8 2 ; 5 0 0 ; Vermont general inquiries may be velopment consisting of : ft restaurant, 70,000 sq. the 63 unit multi -family. `ft $640,000: Vermont Natural Ag Products, directed to VEDA at the 1) a 60 unit multi-familyof general office, 2500 dwelling, 346 Farrell St. t Kr J)rna Plywood, LLC: Vermont- Inc. The project consists address below: dwelling, 2) 160 residen- sq. ft drive-in bank, and Plywood, LLC is a new the of bag- tial units in four build- ten Copies the oCAL CUSTOM of purchase (4) (10) residential units, of application company .being formed ging equipment and Vermont Economic Deve- ings, 3) a 63 unit multi- 6) a 7200 sq. ft addition are available for public to acquire approximately construction of a 7,000 lopment Authority opt an 52 acres ...of land and sq. ft. building to house 58 East State Street, family dwelling, 4) subdi- to an indoor recreational inspection at the South buildings comprising ap- the new equipment Suite 5 viding two (2) parcels of facility, and 7) . an exist- Burlington City Hall. proximately 119,000 sq. which will be located at Montpelier, VT 05602 24.458 acres into eight ing 16,000 sq. ft Aelevi- ABORTION? WHY? ft. located thereon and the company's site at 8) lots, 5) a 90,000 sq. sion studio and office John Dinklage, Chairman :ONSIDERADOPTION machinery and equip- 297 Lower Foote Street December 20, 2003 ft building which will in- building. ' The amend- South Burlington Deve- Warm, secure loving 'I bi f ment, formerly owned by in the Town of Middle- clude 11,000 sq. ft. of ment consists .of adding lopment Review Board PUBLIC HEARING home eve a a or -Chesapeake Hardwood bury, Vermont. Vermont newborn baby. Products, Inc. The as- Natural Ag Products. me- SOUTH BURLINGTON Please call: sets to be acquired are nufactares several soil DEVELOPMENT 00)606-4411 A-951 located on Route 100 in amendment products. REVIEW BOARD the Town of Hancock, Iraa@ a es Vermont. Vermont; Ply $ 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 • The South Burlington wood, LLC .will awn and Bradford Community De- Development Review SO BURLINGTON operate the assets and velopment Corporation. Board will hold a public use them to produce Bradford Community De- hearing at the South Bur - Sat. & Sun. 8:30am- hardwood veneer -faced velopment Corporation is lington City Hall Confer- ous Contents clothing, I ood products. a 501 P ence Room, 575 Dorset louse, including clothing, p�^ p ti (3) non- rga- Street, South Burlington, housewares&misc. organization that orga- 9 treasures. Park &enter $ 3 6 , 0 0 0 ; F I e x - A - nizes and supports a va- Vermont on Tuesday, behind H2 Stonehedge Seal, Inc. The project riety of community dove- January 6, 2004, at 7:30 Dr. 802 864-4118 consists of the purchase lopment projects in the P-M. to consider " the fol- ( ) of equipment and the Town of Bradford. The lowing: LITSF.IELD Turkish making of energy effl= project. consists of the a pottery, tiles. Sale ciency-related renova- purchase of a 24,000 sq. 1. Application #CU-03- benefit Habitat for tions to the Flex -A -Seal ft, building . situated on 18 of Jolley Associates nanityy. Dec. 20, 10-5; manufacturing facility to 3.4' acres of land on for conditional use ap- 21, 11-6. Joslyn cated at 1 Jackson Route *25 in Bradford. proval under. Section ind Barn, E. .Warren Stfest in the Town of Bradford Community De- 14.10, Conditional Use (802)496-7442. Essex Junction, Ver- velopment Corp. plans Review, of the South mont. The company to renovate and lease Burlington Land Deve- gal Notices manufactures a product the building space to the lopment Regulations. line of sealing devices existing animal clinic te- The request is to place a NOTICE OF and welded metal bel- nant and three non-profit 5'xT shed on the pro - PUBLIC HEARING lows used in various in- community service orga- perty, which will contain dustries. nizations, Including a groundwater filtration ice i s n e r e b y Orange East Senior system, to remain on the lthat a public hear, $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 ; J a m e s Center and the Bradford. Property for a few years, m will at conducted r, Carew and Reginald Community/Youth Cen- 977Shelburne Ad. 'Vermont Economic Swenor. The project ter. 2. Application #CU-03- consists of the purchase 19 of Wisman-Lamphere velopment Authority of Lot 3 Parcel C in the T h e t a x= e x e m p t Architects for conditional EDA°) on Monde !y Forestdale Technologg!`commercial paper notes use approval under Sec- uary 5, 2004 at 10:15, Park in the Town of Es- described herein consti- .tion 14.10, Conditional i. at its offices _ at 58 sex, Vermont and cons tute a portion of a tax- Use Review, of t h e to St, Montpelier, Vt. truction thereon of a exempt commercial pap- South Burlington Land @2 regarding the pro- 6,000 sq. ft. building.,er note issuance in the Development Regula- sed issue of tax- Messrs. ' Carew and amount not to exceed tions. Request if for )mpt commercial pap- Swenor will form a Ii- $30 million to fund the permission ' to convert notes pursuant to Tile mited liability company above projects and refi- 4800 sq. ft or general of- V.S.A., Chapter 12 to own the project facility nance tax-exempt com- fice and 6700 sq. ft of rich notes will not and will lease part or all mercial paper notes com- research & testing labo- nstitute a debt or of the facility to Sheet ing due. ratory use to educational d9e of the faith or Metal Designs, Inc., a facility use, 75 Green dit of the State of company wholly owned All persons desiring Mountain Dr. wont or VEDA), to fi- by them. This company to be heard in the pro- 3. Final plat application ice or refinance .the manufactures and . ins- posed issue of tax- #5D-03-79 of F&M Deve- ,jects of the following talcs commercial heating exempt commercial pap- lopment Co, LLC to rowers, in the approx- and ventilation duct er notes are invited to at- amend a previously ap GI T Y ftlw .� � Yam' • x�A11' � *'� vv Ejcperience! K OP TIMA ortmatic Transmission • Clock ,vs/Locks/Mirrors • AC '> t • Dual Front Airbags RA WN s • Cloth Interior FOR ONLY rs • Pwr. Driver's Se �f;a� trs • Floor Mats 2 02 --.._ k G fflA`,"ED',',,,0NA • 2 OL 16V 4 Cyl. DOHC E.F.I. • Automatic • Cruise • 8 Way Adjustable Driver's Seat • Dual Air • Dual Sliding Doors • CD Player • Power Windows and Mirrors ®WN w' � FOR ONLY: • Tilt Steering • ABS Brakes • , 3 • Air Conditioning - Floor Mats 104 �:� r E± j 0 d �V!NFJ, 0 • 24 Valve DOHC 3.5L 6CyI. J jy ? .1 d' �' d • Pwr. Windows/Locks/Mirrors r p r_ t • AM/FM CD Player a `OwN nl • 6-Way Adjustable Driver's Seat-, FOR ONLY, 4; • Air Conditioning • Tilt • Center Console • Mats • Front & Rear 12-Volt Power • t�n R °"? DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 6 JANUARY 2004 approving the whole plat, it is inaccurate. Mr. Snyder said they have asked for reconsideration of a District Environmental Court finding that there was a violation regarding grading around specific homesites. Mr. Dinklage suggested staff go back through previous approvals and review the situation. He felt the Board should also rethink its policy about final gradings on a final plat. He said there is an issue when it affects the capacity of a wetland. Mr. Belair said staff doesn't request grading for single family homes. He suggested giving the applicant an opportunity to respond to the allegations made tonight while staff researches what the rules were. He felt there needs to be research as to whether there is an impact on stormwater management. Mr. Bolton felt the Board needs legal clarification, especially since there have been rule changes with regard to stormwater management. Mr. Smichenko also noted that the list of people to be notified of DRB proceedings does not reflect people whose properties abut the berms. Mr. Belair said there is no legal requirement to notify anyone. Mr. Kupferman asked if it was the fill material that built the berms. Mr. Smichenko said he believed it was. Mr. Snyder said the impervious surface hasn't changed. Mr. Bolton moved to continue Final Plat Application #SD-03-02 until 3 February 2004. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Public Hearing: Application #CU-03-18 of Jolley Associates for conditional use approval under Section 14.10, Conditional Use Review, of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is for permission to place a 5'x7' shed on the property which will contain a groundwater filtration system, to remain on the property for a few years, 977 Shelburne Road: The applicant was not present for this review. Mr. Belair noted the gas station has some soil contamination. Ground water was found to -4- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 6 JANUARY 2004 have some oil in it. The amount falls within state law, but the applicant is concerned water might seep into the basement where food is stored. They are thus sinking a pump which will filter out the oil. The remaining clean water will be discharged into the sanitary sewer system. When there is no more oil found, they will get rid of the building. Its main purpose of the building is to see that the water doesn't freeze. The State is aware of this effort and supports it. Mr. Kupferman moved to approve Application #CU-03-18 of Jolley Associates subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Public Hearing: Application #CU-03-19 of Wieman-Lamphere Architects for conditional use approval under Section 14.10, Conditional Use Review, of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is for permission to convert 4800 sq. ft. of general office and 6700 sq. ft. of research & testing laboratory use to educational facility use, 75 Green Mountain Drive: and 7. Site plan application #SP-03-49 of Wieman-Lamphere Architects to amend a previously approved site plan for a 25,200 sq. ft. building consisting of. 1) 13,700 sq. ft. of educational facility use, 2) 6700 sq. ft. of research & testing laboratory use, and 3) 4800 sq. ft. of general office use. The amendment consists of converting 4800 sq. ft. of general office and 6700 sq. ft. of research & testing laboratory use to educational facility use, 75 Green Mountain Drive: Mr. Lavigne said the educational facility is the Vermont Common School. Mr. Belair said the setback line is now shown correctly at 30 ft. He had no other issues. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Application #CU-03-19 and Site Plan Application #SP- 03-49 of Wieman-Lamphere Architects subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Mr. Belair advised that item #8 on the agenda (Final Plat Application #SD-03-79 of F & M Development Co., LLC) had withdrawn. -5- TO 919028464101 P.01 L)'sZrjb'-Jtcr of Fetroleum R'Odixt,5 58CO1?Ins'Inc. . I P.Q. Box 671 Sc. Altars, Vermcnt C- -5478 802 527-0116 693-7744 01-20-2004 09:33AM FROb' SB COLLT�4S DATE: L-f to 0 LM; -r ART, 0 MESSAGE: r- � L-p-, ry m CL n T• w Q w 6 Cr LL IM I i _ Little House by Andre ; at the Eon Hill Farm 4200 Roosevelt Huy. ; i U-Q Colchester, �Vermiont 05446 y --� 878-8733 D 7x7 $123 D 7x14 $143 Z 7x8 $990 Z $x10 $1190 Z $x12 $1290 7 . a Buildings are 'butt with: . i, ' 11 a Ali wood cor"fruction a Floor Joists 75" on center A 8x 1 a $ 17'40 • e 2x6 Pressure 'Treated Floor Joists A 8x g 2 $ 1 84i1 a 2x4 Stud and rafters a Pressure tregted 5/6" Piywaod onf"r • 518" Mywoo# on roof Plus... ,1 l3 8x8 } a Drip edge • 30 year Arcialtec-IMWl shingles B 8x12 „ a Tongue & groove siding B $x14 1 I`. H 8x16 COMPLETELY ASSEMBLED. C READY FOR USE c FREE DELIVERY `� • ; (%Wth*k 25 miles) - - -- tiJAq6 101fii-ci[tC $1540 $1690 $1790 $2040 $2244 CITY OF SOUTH BU LINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 8, 2004 Carl Ruprecht P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, VT 05478 Re: Conditional Use Application #CU-03-18 Dear Mr. Ruprecht: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on 1/6/04 (effective 1/7/04). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months of this approval or this approval is null and void. In addition, the applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy prior to use of this structure. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Encl. Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested - #70032260000287734063 Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Encl. Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested - #70032260000287734063 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date- December 18, 2003 \drb\misc\ olley_associates\conditional_use.doc Application received. November 7, 2003 CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION #CU-03-18 977 SHELBURNE ROAD Meetina Date: January 6. 2004 Owners/Applicant Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, VT 05476 Engineer Property Information Schreib Engineering, Inc. Tax Parcel 1540-00977-C Egypt Road Commercial 1 (Cl) District-, Traffic Overlay — Zone 1 District East Fairfield, VT ±1.74 Acres I Location Map ..+ ^.40%we- F elk. .r. K77 T Fw • 1 Jolley Associates, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting conditional use approval to place a 5' x 7' shed on the property, which will contain a groundwater filtration system, to remain on the property for a few years, 977 Shelburne Road. The subject property contains approximately 1.74 acres and is located in the Commercial 1 (Cl) District. Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on November 7, 2003 and have the following comments. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 14.10(E) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed conditional use shall meet the following standards: 1. The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. The proposed structure is a 35 square foot shed and is consistent with the planned character of the area. 2. The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located. Pursuant to Section 5.01(A) of the Land Development Regulations, Commercial 1 Districts are hereby formed in order to encourage the location of general retail and office uses in a manner that serves as or enhances a compact central business area. Other uses that would benefit from nearby access to a central business area, including clustered residential development and small industrial employers may be permitted if they do not interfere with accessibility and continuity of the commercial district. Large -lot retail uses, warehouses, major industrial employers, and incompatible industrial uses shall not be permitted. Planned Unit Developments are encouraged in order to coordinate traffic movements, promote mixed -use developments, provide shared parking opportunities, and to provide a potential location for high - traffic generating commercial uses. Any uses not expressly permitted are prohibited, except those that are allowed as conditional uses. Staff feels the proposed 35 square foot shed is acceptable within the C1 District. 3. The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. K Staff believes that the proposed structure will not adversely affect municipal services. (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. Staff believes that the proposed structure is in keeping with the character of surrounding properties and will not adversely affect the character of the area or the ability to develop adjacent properties. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. The proposed structure will not affect traffic in the vicinity. (d) Bylaws in effect. The proposed structure is in keeping with applicable regulations. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposed structure will not affect renewable energy resources. (0 General public health and welfare. Staff does not believe that the proposed structure will have an adverse affect on general public welfare. Pursuant to Section 3.13(F) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed conditional use shall meet the following standards: The Development Review Board, in granting conditional use approval, may impose conditions of the following: 1. Size and construction of structures, quantities of materials, storage locations, handling of materials, and hours of operations. The proposal in front of the Development Review Board is for the construction of a 35 square foot shed. Staff does not feel it is necessary attach any additional conditions relating to quantities of materials, storage locations, handling of materials, or hours of operation. 2. Warning systems, fire controls, and other safeguards. Staff assumes there are State standards on safeguards for a structure like this, and therefore does not feel it is necessary for the Development Review Board to impose any major warning systems, fire controls, or other safeguards. 3. Provision for continuous monitoring and reporting. 3 The applicant is designing a remediation system that exceeds the requirements of the State. Therefore, staff does not feel it necessary for the Development Review Board to impose any additional conditions relating to monitoring and reporting. 4. Other restrictions as may be necessary to protect public health and safety. Again, the applicant is designing a remediation system that exceeds the requirements of the State. Therefore, staff does not feel it necessary for the Development Review Board to impose any additional conditions relating to public health and safety. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Conditional Use application #CU-03-18 as submitted. Respectfully submitted, Ray Belair,'Administrative Officer Copy to: Carl Ruprecht, applicant 0 Little House by Andre at the Elm Hill Farm nllf 4200 Roosevelt Hwy. Colchester, Vermont 05446 Z 878-8733 D 70 D 7x10 x, r� , Z 7x8 $990 Z 8x10 $1190 Z 8x12 $1290 U; Buildings are built with: $123U • All wood construction • Floor joists 16" on center $1430 •2x6 Pressure Treated Floor Joists • 2x4 Stud and rafters • Pressure treated 518" Plywood on floor • 518" Plywood on roof 5� Plus... ij • Drip edge • 30 year Architectural shingles ii, \• Tongue & groove siding COMP ETELY ASSEMBLED ADY FOR USE REE DELIVERY (within 25 miles) Prices subject to change without notice A 8x10 $1740 A 8x12 $1840 $1540 $1690 $1790 $2040 $2240 10/28/2003 10:20 8022413296 WASTE MANAGEMENT DT" ! PAGE 02/02 wok Mrr��,. Vermont ont DepaRm®nt of Fish and Wikflife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conserva6 State Goolopist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING 114PAIRED 1�e00-2ss-Ote/ TDD>Voloa 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD Mr. Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlingt5403 n 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT October 28, 2003 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION 103 South Main Street West Building 05676-0404 FAX 80z441-3296 TEL 802-241-3888 RE: Water Infiltration at 977 Shelburne Road, South Burlington /SMS Site 4941589 Dear Mr. Belair: I have been asked by qarl Ruprecht at S.B. Collins, Inc. to contact your office regarding the required water faRtraticin at 977 Shelburne Road. As you may Imow, tht groundwater at this site is contaminated with petroleum. Because of this, any discharge fro n this site must first be filtered to remove the contaminants. This operation is usually pt rformed by activated carbon media in two fifty-five gallon containers. These units, susceptib e to freezing; are housed in a small heated shed in the vicinity of the pumping station. This particular locatio underwent extensive contaminated soil removal this spring which may limit the time reel fired for filtering of water to just a few years. It cannot be predicted, however, exactly how long this process will be required. If you have any questi1vt. s, then please feel free to contact me at 802-241-3897 or via email at a. linda.elliottanr.stateus. Sincerely, Linda Elliott, Project Sites Management Se C: Carl Ruprecht, SB lCollins, Inc. K!site-files\l99a 1589.Sbelbume oad.Mobil.NortK2003\1028-zota ".letter nal Offices - Sarre/Essex Jet./PittsfordVRutland/Springfieid/St. Johnsbury CITY OF SOUTH BURLLN1, GTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit Number All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the reauested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Type of application. check one: () peal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation) ( equest for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( ) Other PROVISION OF ,ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANSI) WHAT ACTION OF THE ADNIINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING? 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address,, phone and fax #) a:> X( G r) ( Si-, A,ti--� l✓'ti _ i7 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) CA,,?- t_ (2v� t-t �-i e o � 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax P! -- ,�; N-W� ✓ts A �tl 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: `�% S {--�-�•', v • C f �,,�,_` 6) TAX PARCEL III # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office 1 7) PROTECT DESCRIPTION � s* _54-e a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) sleight of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) 7 ' a Ae A=ice e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) t) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 3) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing _% Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing _% Proposed, (does not apply to residential uses) 9 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping: c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14) LIST ABUTTERS ( List names and addresses of all abutting property owners on a separate sheet of paper). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT Cl? C' - 0-�—= SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: Lh"I'll REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date :f NPI)ES Nurnber: VTG910001 STAVE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN-., OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION GF,NERAL PERMIT 3-9004 FOR' DISCI 1ARGI ;S PROM PETROLEUM RELATED REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES PA IZT I. COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT A, '1 his permit covers discharges from petroleum related remediation activities to all Class B waters within tho State of Vermont including all waters of the United States (including wetlands) within the State of Venuont to the extent provided by Section 1-01A of the Vermont Water Quality Standards, with the exception of Outstanding Resource Waters and Class One Wetlands. Petroleum iclated remediation activities include, but are not limited to, the discharge ofwone or more of the following: ground ,end/or surface water from remediation systems; gr-ound and/or surface water ac.camiulating as a result of Excavation activi • ground and/or surface water contaniinated by spills; f; oiuicf wati;i resixltiri ; from pumping and/or monitoring aquifer(s). All of the previously mentioned discharges result frorn corrective actions involving above ground or underground storage lank s used to store gasoline, diesel fuel, kerosene, jet fuel, or heating oil, or the transportation of tlic.se fuels, 11. Diischarees Not Covered 'I'ltcfollowing discharges frorn petrolcurn related remediation activities are not covered by this llirti7iit: l . Discharges from federally owned facilities. ?... I)isch,irges to groundwater. 3 Discharges to Outstanding Resource Waters and Class One Wetlands. 4. Discha.rgos front petroleum related remediation activities that are mixed with or contarninated by any other wastes or discharges. C. AittlEUi'tYi1trori Any person who wishes to obtain authorization to discharge from petroleum related remediation "etivities tend:r this general perrnit shall follow the application requirements in Part II. C'ART II. APPLICATIONREQUIREMENTS A. �'vt,ticc� t�f Txatcr�t,Ic�r ij�s �t�iti I�'ec Application for coverage under this permit shall be made by filing a Notice of Intent (NOI) on f0rins provided by the Secretaq. The completed and signed NOI shall be filed with the Agency of Nalural RCSOtrl"CeS, together with an administrative fee ($100.00 as of 7/1/01; fees are established by 3 V.S.A. §'282 2 and may be changed by statute revisions) at the following address: Vermont I)cp.{rtaicnt of Environmental Conservation NVastcwater Management Division Sewing Iiitildiag, 103 South Main Street Waterbm-y, Vermont 05671-0405 ,Arty person who files a NOI shall provide notice, on a form provided by the Secretary, to the invaicipal clerk of dic municipality in which the discharge is located at the time the NOI is filed Willi tllYj Secretary. C. 11-ohlir Conirients on NOI For a period often days following receipt of a NOI, the Secretary shall provide an opportunity for wi itten cot-nni grit rci;arding whether the NOI complies with the terms and conditions of this permit. 1). Addilio-n 11.,1'.tttot_ni.-4tion Upon roquest of the Secretary any person who files a NOI shall submit such additional information that niay be necessary to enable the Secretary to authorize the discharge under the terms of this I•,cr„iit. F. it€yw>ii►:higAn indh.,idual Permit '1 h rrray require any person who files a NOI to apply for an individual permit if: 1, the 111axirnurn daily design flow exceeds 50,000 gpd or the proposed discharge is to a rcceivin;; water with a watershed area less than 1.0 square mile at the point of discharge; or 2. the discharge does not qualify for coverage under this permit; or 3. th<< Secretary finds that an individual permit is required pursuant to 13.12 Ill. of the General Permit Rules. I . 4;c+vcr�a c„i:; lricr Fxistin individual Permits Persons who are authorized to discharge from petroleum related remediation activities by an existing; individual permit are not required to obtain coverage under this pennitduring the term of the iridivid►tial pe►►nit. C,. Authorization to Discharge Any pc_rson who f►lcs a NOI shall be authorized to discharge under the teens of this permit upon the rcc,eipt of a v4i-ittert deternnination by the Secretary that the NOI filing is complete, and the discharge is eiit,.Jblc; for coverage under the tenns and conditions of this general permit. 11. V..0hireto Notify Dischargers who fail to notify the Secretary of their intent to be covered under this permit or fail to obtain at► horizatio►r to discharge under an individual permit, and discharge without a perinit, are in violation oft 0 V.S.A. Chal:►ter 47 and the federal Clean Water Act. ,.Qnn:► Page 2 of 11 l'AKI' ll.li. i, FLU1+ NT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS A,- Effluent and Monitoring Frequent l )ming the period begirming on October 15, 2002, and lasting through September 30, 2007, the 1 ermittee is nuthox iz,ed to discharge from each discharge point specified on the NOI - Treated petrolcum contaminated water - in accordance with the following limitations and monitoring rcquircmcrtts. I" tow llcttrr, Total 1 'Total P 1 IyilritC Methy (MI'l I)iscltargc Limitations Monitoring Requirements ctit 1;) Characteristic Monthly Average Monitoring Frequency Sample Type See (3) Below 1 x monthly Measured Total (4) ne (5.6) 5 ppb 2 x monthly Grab 4troleur�i �rrboiis ('l'1'1I) i5.6,7) 50 ppb 1000 ppb 2 x monthly " Grab 2 x monthly Grab I tort -butyl ether the Monitor only 2 x monthly Grab t't Discharg,cs lasting less than two weeks in duration shall be sampled a tnininium of one _time for those pa,anueters listed in the table above. tz' Whe.re there are multiple discharge points, monitoring for the above parameters is required for each discharge point. (3) Tlic, flow discharged shall not exceed the design capability of the treatment system. t'`' i-`losv shall be reported as the total gallons discharged since the last meter reading. Plows may be reasured or estimated by use of integrating timers on pumps, or by use of a weir or flume and a co,itinuous recording flow meter. ._ If samplti results indicate that the effluent does not meet the specified limitations an additional effluent sample shall be taken within 3 business days of receiving the sample results and analyzed for 13enzene and Total B"rEX as well as TPH, if applicable. See also Part 111.84. "Total 133 I:X shall be measured as the sure of benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylenes. EPA rncthod 802111 or other 1,11A approved methodology shall be used for the measurements of i�c:iue.ne, etlilybenzene, toluene, and xylenes, including ortho-, meta-, and para-xylene. Modified 1;t'n method 8015 or other EPA approved methodology shall be used to measure TPIL EPA rncthod 8021I3 or other EPA approved methodology shall be used to measure MTBE. t'} 11111 monitoring; is required if the source is diesel, heating oil, kerosene, and/or jet fuel, Gtiu:ral Permit 3-9004 Page 3 of 11 11. Sji Tial Conditions Efilnent samples shrill be taken after final treatment and prior to discharge to waters of the State and prior- to mixing with other discharges. 2. If tile:, permitter employs carbon adsorption canisters, either as part or all of the treatment system necessary to meet the effluent limitations specified in Part III.A. above, the pefmitwe. shall replace the first carbon adsorption canister prior to breakthrough of dissolved hydrocarbons. The time of breakthrough shall be calculated based on flow data developed front piunp tests find analysis of untreated contaminated groundwater. The calculated breaktlixhigh link, shall be utilized as a schedule for replacing and rotating the carbon adsot ption units unless ongoing analyses demonstrate that a different breakthrough time in(etval is appropriate in order to meet the effluent limitations specified in Part III.A. above. The dates of carbon canister replacement shall be reported on form WR-43. 3. If the permittee employs air strippers, either as part or all of the treatment system necessary to meet the effluent limitations specified in Part 11I.A. above, the permittee shall clean the air strippers on a regular basis as appropriate and report the dates of the creaning(s) on form W 1LA 3 . 4. Shotild this discharge exceed the effluent limitations specified in Part 11I.A. above at ally tlifie, then the permittee shall: a. Notify the Wastewater Management Division (802- 241-3822) within 24 hours. b. Submit a written report within 5 days detailing the reason(s) for the violation and the procedures to be employed so that the discharge will once again be in compliance with the effluent limitations. c. The Wastewater Management Division will evaluate the situation on a case -by -case basis and may require the pertnittce to cease discharging until such time as treatment has been restored to a level that will consistently meet the effluent limitations. The discharge shall not cause erosion or contain sediment that causes or contributes to a violation of water quality standards of the receiving water. C, The discharge shall not contain a visible sheen, foam, or floating solids at any time. 7. The. disch±;trgc shall not cause a visible discoloration of the receiving water. K. The discharge shall not cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards of the rcccivin- "v' 'r. 9. This permit does not authorize the discharge of water treatment additives without approval from the Departn7ent. Water treatment additives include any material that is added to water ttsec.] at the facility or to discharges generated by the facility to condition or treat the water. In the, event a permittee proposes to utilize water treatment additives, the permittee shall submit to the I )epai (nient, for review and written approval, a request including Material Safety Data Slicets (MSUS) to discharge water treatment additives. Pav,e 4 of I I C. Ottl� y 4a ilw Fcc Disclra.rges authorized by this pen -nit are subject to operating fees. The permittee shall submit the operating fees in accordance with the procedures provided by the Secretary. 1-1). 1vio it(iring apd.J] te.porting The PC-11114teca is n,;quired to submit monitoring results as specified on a Discharge Monitoring Repoil (Dorm WR-43). Reports are due. on the 15th day of each month beginning with the month following the d<<tc of authorization to discharge under this permit. If, hi arty reporting, period, there has been no discharge, the permittee must submit that information by the retort due (late. Signed copies of these, and all other reports required herein, shall be subini to to I -lie Secretary at the following address: Agency of Natural Resources Dopartment of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division 103 South Main Street, The Sewing Building Wtzlcrbary, Vermont 05671-0405 All reports shall be signed: l . ltr the case of corporations,, by a principal executive officer of at least the level of vice president, or his/her duly authorized representative, if such representative is responsible for the overall operation of the facility from which the discharge described in the permit form originates; In the case of a. partnership, by a general partner; In the case of a sole proprietorship, by the proprietor; 1. In the case of a municipal, State, or other public facility, by either a principal executive officer, rat.iking elected official, or other duly authorized employee. I:. S rthaand Artalt_� s 'I lie sarnplingr,, preservation, Handling, and analytical methods used shall conform to regulations published pursuant to Section 304(g) of the Clean Water Act, as specified in the most current revisions of the Code of federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 136. Samples shall be representative of the volume and quality of effluent discharged over the sampling and reportint; period. All samples are to be taken during normal operating hours. The permittee .,trill identify the cfflucnt sampling location used for each discharge. The l.enitittee shrill calibrate and perform maintenance procedures on all monitoring and analytical irIstrurrtenttrtiOil at regular intervals to ensure accuracy of measurements or shall ensure that both a tivitics tare conducted. G-MCN11 C°n,nflt 3-9004 Page 5 of 11 I'lac, I7c yniittc{; shall keep records of these activities and shall provide such records upon request of the cct ctary. F. RcCordinu of Result-; 'l lac I)er,nittee shall riaaintain records of all information resulting from any monitoring activities n-11clutired including: exact place, date., and time of sampling; '7. 'l'hc d{ales and tirnes the analyses were performed; person(s) who performed the analyses; 4. 'f l,:, alralytic:al ttichniques and methods used including sample collection handling and preservation tcch..aiclues; 5. 'fhe, results of all required analyses; 6. 'i'he records of monitoring activities and results, including all instrumentation and calibration and uns�iriter),u-ice records; 7. The original calculation and data bench sheets of the operator who performed analysis of the effluent pursuant to requirements of Part III.A. of this permit. Tlac results of nionitorind requirements shall be reported (in the units specified) on the Vermont reporting foutaa WR-43 or other form approved by the Secretary. G. j�tjj yil yap al iN'1 OnjtorLiUx ly 1?ermittee if tl ko, per,a,lttee 17'lonitors any pollutant at the location(s) designated herein more frequently than rccluired by this permit, using approved analytical methods as specified above, the results of such 10011itor,ing shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the values required in the Discharge Monitoring Repoit Form WFZ-43. Such increased frequency shall also be indicated. Il. �1_cc�t'c1:�,lt�etc;ttE,ar All records au(I information resulting from the monitoring activities required by this permit including all records of analyses performed, calibration and maintenance of instrumentation, and rccordings from continuous monitoring instrumentation shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) yeaN, acid shall be submitted to Department representatives upon request. This period shall be exac-ode..d daring clue course of unresolved litigation regarding the discharge of pollutants or when rcc;ttostcd by the Secretary, tacticial r' miit 3-9004 rage 6 of t t PART IV. STANDARD CONDITIONS A. Dlui?v' td.d t,(s.ta oly '1 hc, Ire rnia e shall comply with all terms and conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitn'tes a violation of 10 V.S.A. Chapter 47 and the federal Clean Water Act and is grounds for ;1aa c:11forc nion.t Faction, or suspension, or revocation of the permittee's authorization to discharge ;i lock:,° this 1"c r(lit. 11. Noncompliance Notification In, tl;.f, evt:lzt tho< pennittec is unable to comply with any of the conditions of this permit due, among bfc:akdown or 1)lailite11alice of waste treatment equipment {biological and physical -chemical systeins incltidi�ig, but not limited to, all pipes, transfer pumps, compressors, collection ponds or t oks for the. se ;rogation of treated or untreated wastes, ion exchange columns, or carbon 1. accidents caused by human en•or or negligence, or 3. ob,hci c���tsr�s st�cl� as at: is of nature, fine perknitice shall 110tify the Secretary within 24 hours of becoming aware of such condition ov b'y 111c ra xi bilsiness day and shall provide the Secretary with the folloiving information, in 4 ta4idag, witldin fire (5) days: 11, C:-UAse ofnoa-cornpliarlce; b. a description of the non -complying discharge including its impact upon the receiving v"ater; anticipated period the condition of non-compliance is expected to continue or, if such condition has been corrected, the duration of the period of non-compliance; d- steps taken by the perrnittec to reduce and eliminate the non -complying discharge; and swps to bc. taken by the permittee to prevent recurrence of the condition of 11.711-core pliancc. C. 01y.y>ltiobi. and M"611telmlice `HIC Feffflith.o shall, ,t all times, maintain in good working order and operate as efficiently as po>sil. lr all treatniont or control facilities or systems installed or used by the permittee to achieve conipli<ance with tl-}e terms and conditions of this permit. The operation and maintenance of this f<3c;ility shall be pc.iformed only by qualified personnel. VccnY it 3-900"1 Page 7 of 11 The diversion or bypass of facilities necessary to maintain compliance with the terms and conditions of this perimit is prohibited except where authorized under terms and conditions of an emergency pollulion perrr'iit i."u%A pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 1268. ls, ,>�'al�;�� l�r'l:111���rlicl►t Collccted sGttienings, sludges, and other solids removed in the course of treatment and control of diso..harges shill be stored, treated and disposed of in accord with 10 VSA Chapter 159 and/or the tc:rois and conditions of any certification, interim or final, transitional operation authorization or ordl� r i!"sued pursIUMit to 10 V.S.A., Chapter 159 that is in effect on the effective date of this permit ()r is iFsiEed during the; term of this permit. i$r�ty to Njit.k,]-Ale per utittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any adverse impact to waters of V. the State resulting frorri non-compliance with any condition specified in this permit, including accelerated or additional monitoring as necessary to determine the nature and impact of the uoji-r-orttl'rlying discharge. (i. 'Dills, io lie apoly II'a discharge authorized under this pennit is anticipated to continue after the expiration date of this pep Alit;, the. 1101-1Yiittt.e-', must submit a complete application for coverage under a new permit 30 days prior to the expiration (date of this permit. 11, t"mitimiation of the Expired General Permit Provided the perinittoe has reapplied in accordance with Section W.G. of this permit, the expired peniiit continues in .force and effect until a new general permit is issued. Only those facilities previously authorized to discharge under the expired permit are covered by the continued permit. �ts.tlitirir _.x_C�cYier Permit 'I lie Secrcuuy may requite any person applying for reissuance of an individual permit to be subject to a general peralit provided the Secretary finds the discharge complies with all the conditions of the general permit and the discharge is more appropriately covered under the general permit. 'n 011iflatiov of ('o,YCi"a C Upon elinihvrtion ol'a discharge authorized under this permit any permittee may request that coverage under this perriiit be terminated by submittal of a completed and signed Request for Termination of Coverage Form to the Secretary. Coverage under this permit shalt be terminated ui)013 rCce.il)t ref a written deterraination by the Secretary that the Request for Termination of Coverage ding is complete and the discharge has been eliminated. CeticeM 3'err►rit 3-9004 Page 9 of i 1 K. Tra psfer of Mtn orization to Discharge .Arty p;,uvittee lnay transfer the authorization to discharge under this permit by submittal of a completed and signed Transfer of Authorization to Discharge Form to the Secretary. The notice shall bo, submitted. 30 days prior to the proposed date of transfer and shall include the £ollovAng: l . the nrunC and address of the present permittee; ?. the name and address of the prospective permittee; 3, the proposed date of transfer; and 11. a slatenicrtt signed by the prospective permittee, stating that: a. Thecondi tions of the facility operation that contribute; to, or affect, the discharge will not be materially different under the new ownership; b. he/she has read and is familiar with the terms of the permit and agrees to comply with all tertlls and conditions of the permit; and c, he/slit has adequate funding to operate and maintain the treatment system and remain in cotripliance with the terms and conditions of the permit. I,. IRIO—dif-axtion of Cenci al Permit Aftcr notice and opportunity for public hearing this permit may be modified in accord with General Pen -nit RiAcs 13.12 C: 7. M. Hc,vocat9.ioa of Authorization to Discharge The Secretary may revoke or suspend, in whole or in part, authorization to discharge under this petiltit in accord with General Permit Rules 13.12 C.G. N. ii1;13tpf.l;titl� 111; pol-atlittee shall allow the Secretary or his/her authorized representatives, upon presentation of CrQJ'_..ntlail5 to: 1. latter upon the permittee's premises where a discharge is located or in which any records are required to he kept finder the terms and conditions of this permit; and 2. At any time inspect the site and sample any discharge, and at reasonable times have access to and copy any records required to be kept under the terns and conditions of this permit. 0. I't gytb�}, tyr,tti� �st� Issuance of this permt does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or ally exclusive privileges, Ilor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights. cil;ncral N1,111i[ 3-900.1 Page 9 or I 1'. Federal, State Or Local Laws Issum),_c} of this penxiit does not authorize any infringement of Federal, State or local laws or regul:atio3as. This peri lit does not convey authorization to conduct any activity within wetlands including but not limited to; clearing grading, excavation, placement of temporary or permanent ciosion and sedinient control structures or any other activity required by this permit. Any such rctivi.ty wilhir> a wetland pit require a conditional use determination pursuant 10 V.S.A. Section 05(b) art(Vos a perrtpit pursuant to Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act or both. ".thhis pc.ralit does not authorize any discharge or activity which could adversely affect threatened or clad aryl e'red species protected under the federal'Endan.gered Species Act, which could constitute the vikiog of threatened or endangered species pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 123, or which could jc-opardize conservation programs established by the Secretary under 10 V.S.A. Chapter 123. �. i'ccl.tt? Y14 ar,ltc�ili>Ic� Activity not a Defense It shall not be a defense for the permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been to necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions, of this Peralit. R. Oit.and hazardous Substance Liability, Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of legal action or relieve the pk unittcc from any rQ.sr)onsibilities, liabilities or penalties to which the permittee is or may be subject wider 10 V.19.A. Section 1281. 5. �'�ca.rnl�y,fclr 1'ct�ix�it �'iol.�ti�?r1 10 V.S.A, Section 12.75(a) provides that: "Any parson who violates any provision of this subchapter or who fails, neglects or refuses to obey or comply with any order or the terms of any permit issued in accordance with this subchapter, shall be tirtcd riot niore. tlian $25,000.00 or be imprisoned not more than six months, or both. Each violation may be a separate offense and, in the case of a continuing violation, each day's continuance may be deemed a separate offense." 10 V.1S.A, Section 8010(c) provides that: "A penalty of not rnorc than $25,000.00 may be assessed for each determination of violation. In a ddilion, if the secretary determines that a violation is continuing the secretary may assess a penalty of not more than $10,000.00 for each day the violation continues. The maximum amount of penalty <tsSr�ssc.d railer this subsection shall not exceed $100,000.00." 1'. l'fas Ali aalse Statement 10 V.S,A. Section 1275 (b) provides that: "Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation or certification in any General Ilmnit ;-9001 Page 1001 11 application, record, report, plan, or other document filed or required to be maintained under this suticizapter, or by army permit, rule, regulation or order issued under this subchapter, or who falsifies, t9inpers with, of knowingly renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be 11laintained under this subchapter or by any permit, rule, regulation, or order issued under this sube-baptor, shall upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000.00 or by ill -111-6sont-Dent for not more than six months, or by both". 11. A uYh;irUy This pounit is issued under authority of 10 V.S.A. Section 1259 which states that. "No person shall discharge any waste, substance, or material into waters of the State, nor shall any person discharge ally waste, substance, or material into an injection well or discharge into a publicly owned treatment works any waste which interferes with, passes through without treatment, or is otherwise incoinpatihle with those works or would have a substantial adverse effect on those works or on wi►ter quality, without first obtaining a permit for that discharge from the secretary", and under the autlinvity of Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, as amended. This permit shall become effective on October 15, 2002. This permit Find the authorization to discharge shall expire on September 30, 2007. /4— Sigliccl this _...f,j „__ day of September 2002. Cli istophu Recchia, Corn inissiotier Department of 1°uviron mental Conservation 1L-tarilyu J. I)Avis, Director Wastcwalcr Management Division (iQm,rnl Pcrmit 3-9004 Page t l of t 1 10/28/2003 10:20 8022413296 PAGE 02/02 r), Departm®nt of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recre Department of Envlronmental Conservatl State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING 1 1.800-253-0191 TDD>Voloe 1-8W-253-0195 Vo>ce>TDD Mr. Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burling 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT RE: Water Dear Mr. Belair: Vermont 0 5403 WASTE MANAGEMENT DIV _5�_')M October 28, 2003 AGENCY'OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION 103 South Main Street West Building 05676-0404 FAX 802441-3296 TEL 802-241-3888 at 977 Shelburne Road, South Burlington /SMS Site 4941589 I have been asked by arl Ruprecht at S.B. Collins, Inc. to contact your office regarding the required water filtraticin at 977 Shelburne Road. As you may know, tht groundwater at this site is contaminated with petroleum. Because of this, any discharge fro this site must first be filtered to remove the contaminants. This operation is usually pt rfon-ned by activated carbon media in two fifty-five gallon containers. These units; suseeptiVe to freezing, are housed in a small heated shed in the vicinity of the pumping station. This particular locatio underwent extensive contaminated soil removal this spring which may limit the time req ired for filtering of water to just a few years. It cannot be predicted, however, exactly how long this process will be required. If you have any Sincerely, Linda Elliott, Project Sites Management Sf C: Carl Ruprecht, SB Ktsite. ffles\199a.1589. Sbelbume then please feel free to contact me at 802-241-3897 or via email at US. Post -it" Fax Not 7671 Date Lj pagof 10. To NO From Co./Dept. Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # Inc. NortK2003\ 1078.zonirng.letter Offices - Sarre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE - EXISTING & PROPOSEn IY.IS ING PROPOSED TYPE SIZE QUANTITY LILAC 1 GAL 6 OA ARBORVITAE 1 GAL. 4 O BARBERRY 1 GAL 6 0 0 ROCK 2 X 4 2 F ' BURNING BUSH 1 GAL 6 0 JUNIPER 1 GAL. 19 ® DECIDUOUS SHRUB 1 GAL 6 Oy SKYMASTER ENGLISH OAK OR EOUIV. 2-1/2* TO 3' CAL. 6 P.*awAfr .Y„!rl'N,IPDri'IlS' P.O. B!1/ lAOM PoiP9ldiD, rd B!/0! MHN21 9a� 250't I 6 lop i 1 1 / 1 � O 1 MH#20 I f P.POPdXTI' O/' I � I S'DIlTfIl.,JNlI �NT�RPRISi,S" I I I �ntU.t�' rrr P,�ad !rs � � I ZONING REGULATIONS Cl ZONE; CO1 rRCIAL MINIMUM LOT AREA REQUIRED 40,000 SO. FT. EXISTING 75.571 SOFT. PROPOS_EE1 75,871 SOFT. (INCLUDES R.O.W.) (INCLUDES R.O.W.) MIMIMUM ROAD FRONTAGE 200 FEET 174 FEET 174 FEET MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK SO FEET 71 FEET 71 FEET MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK 15 FEET 17 FEET 17 FEET MINIMUM REAR SETBACK 30 FEET 91 FEET 91 FEET LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15 FEET 34 FEET VARIES(31-48) FEET MAXIMUM OVERALL COVERAGE 70% 39.67.(30,024 SO.FT.) 48.577(36,852 SOFT. MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE 30% 1.717.(1,300 SO.FT.) 5.67.(4,250 SO.FT.) MAXIMUM FRONT YARD 30% 58.9R(5,057 SO.FT.) 55.27.(4,740 SO.FT.) SETBACK PAVED AREA 50! MHy22 FILL AREA YS TO BE REMOVED 10BENCHMARK' - BUILDING FOUNDATION ELEV. 100.00' MS-_"" 11S MH#23 -- GRASS 0't � / N i © 2St 0 N On N :::... .::..:::::. R.O.W. I � H W .N 6 INCH I y W h �, TO ,SOUTH BURLINGTON I ss ass Js M •"" DUMPSTER 4IA EASE TRAP AREA MANHOLE TO I SURFACE r I PROPLRTr OF JOLLITY 4ASLS aCIf1TZ'AS YOL!!e zl .2>B P"..e 3.20 YOLIl.IlL' -2W P.IGP 441-4v8 96,le" S4 Uwzfx FaET /. i! ACRES Imml.DdS "l vo INSlDB RIGiYT Of iIOYS� PRORF3fl7' Q.r fI.CNN,1fO�fll.S PA AOI /AGM ~.rz1NQ rd mcZ%d IO✓ IpwGd /Af MH,F24 LEGEND — — PROPERTY UNE — — — PoOHT-OF-WAY CURB E POWER UNE w4«������� ��«ww««• UGNT —•—•—•—• SILT FENCE EXISTING CONTOUR MS— MS— MS— EXISTING MUMCIPAL SEWR - _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ ZONING SETABCK 44 C — ] 4 • =7 EXISTING STRUCTURES L AN 0 O I TANKS I - F I _ o ' ---111�F - I III I, +L EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED JI - — O I - � I O I 9 CLEAN OUT I BURGER KING SITE PLAN SCALE: 1"- 20' GRAPHIC SCALE 20 10 0 20 40 60 00 100 L y ''' '(■may '�19 �I AraVlrfT all !ND 6yvr"lo Rl,SBS .. W lMr "S"T, IAOT vrd r" Pear !rs �w EXISTING SIGN REVISION 4, APRIL 11, 2003: PER CITY COMMENTS, ADD ENGLISH OAK REVISION 3, APRIL 10, 2003: PER CITY COMMENTS REVISION 2. APRIL S. 2003: PER CITY COMMENTS REVISION 1, NOV. 18. 2002: PER CITY COMMENTS DRAWN�SB 2002 S. B. COLLINS CROCKED: G.N.S. PROJECT: 829-1 SHELBURNE ROAD SCALE: I .-20' CONTACT ENGINEER TO SITE PLAN - 50' X 85' FIELD VERIFY ALL LOCATIONS PRIOR TO SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT CONSTRUCTION SCHREIB ENGINEERING, INC. SHEET — CONSULTING ENGINEERS — EGYPT ROAD EAST FAIRFIELD, VERMONT OF 1 DRAWING NO. : 829-1-5E REVISION 4 State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-800-253-0195 Voioe>TDD AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION 103 South Main Street West Building 05676-0404 FAX 802-241-3296 TEL 802-241-3888 April 17, 2003 Carl Ruprecht SB Collins Inc. 54 Lower Welden Street St. Albans, VT 05478 RE: Approval of Revised/Updated Corrective Action Plan Shelburne Road Mobil North, South Burlington / SMS Site #941589 Dear Mr, Ruprecht: The Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, Sites Management Section (SMS) has reviewed your letter dated, March 27, 2003 and the revised/updated Corrective Action Plan (CAP) prepared by Stratton French for the above referenced site. This revised/updated CAP is being submitted due to the significant petroleum contamination that remains in the subsurface and the upcoming major renovations for this property. Due to the nature of this reconstruction plan, discussions focused on the feasibility of installing and implementing a more conventional treatment system while the property is undergoing reconstruction. The most significant soil and groundwater contamination lies beneath the store which is scheduled to be demolished and rebuilt. The feasibility of mass contaminated soil removal has been evaluated and is 'incorporated in this revised/updated CAP as the best remedial option. Generally, the SMS discourages the mass removal of contaminated soils, ho-,,vever in this case we have agreed to this concept with the understanding that the site c .,r(s) will share in the cost of soil excavation. Your letter dated, March 27, 2003, and my letter dated April 16, 2003, outlines the responsibility of the site owner and work addressed in the CAP. The SMS submitted a copy of this revised/updated CAP and the November 2000 CAP to the town of South Burlington. No comments were received during the required two - week public comment period. Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury Based on the above, the. SMS approves of the CAP. You may commence the CAP in coordination with the renovation project. If you have any questions, then please feel free to contact Chuck Schwer or myself at 802-241-3888. Sincerely, Linda Elliott, Proj ct anager Sites Management Section C: Stratton French Donna Kinville,South Burlington, City Clerk le:wp\sites\shelburneroad\capletter.doc LANDSCAPE CCHMITTY - M=r & RE P^CFD magma PROPOSED TYPE BS xAxTrY LILAC 1 GAL ! O ARBORVITAE 1 GAL O BARBERRY 1 GAL E Q Q ROCK 2 X 4 F I # BURMNG BUSH 1 GAL & JUNIPER 1 GAL. my ® DEC3D000S SHRUB 1 GAL O (ti SAL TOL MAPLE opt LITTLE LEAF UNDCH 2-1/2• TO 3' CAL e .Imhvrwrr a .YOr dw ✓USTd� lYRY .t GYrY JUSTdR D.B..1. ✓I/S'T�R Dal2LOP,YaNT a, II SOUTA6(iYD Z47dRPif/S'F �uct�r rnr iiw inr I IMPMrr Al 6'/NrY/fYlYIiYD.S' io._iar roar____ BURGER KING GRAPHIC SCALE 20 IO O ao W W t0 100 LEGEND _ — PRoronY urt IM'R-Or-TMY c aAy ".1m UK RT rpR t.T»p OOITOU1 j 9.6T NN11(.T W"Jt - - - - - - - - ZCNNQ WTMKO y ........ C ] ........ • tasT.40 t1ft cTu n 1 r. E; Aim a� Act Artr f" a/ MM - RifJSIAli !f O//A/ ' a aocw ux m_ a a/ AAfYYAll Q/ /�J h'O.I./RD ✓USTdR, C.lRY � ,lNN ✓USTdR D.BA ✓LISTER Dd!'dLOP6/dNT L / 1.. L 4 1, ,. 0 1 ° 6 rtrt� w .soar !//— t` 1, 1, 1a. 4. 1 L L V. 1, 1. 1 tia ti ts. )■0 17.0 1, u 1, 1TAIIIS i !a )w ). . ILI 1, 1. . 1., 1 17 1.. .1 k, 6. � t_ %A�,., L to . L, a, t L ; L i k, {e. I ) B L to, too 1., ! , I.t � 1., 1i / / 1 ►I t- - s s L rr. 104. 4 r f r /xaaurr v � � r 4 SOUTB�l11'D dNTdRPR/SdS OF r r� m A.c► n,► I I SO!/THL,<ND dNTLRPR/Sd 1' r PROPER77' Of �� Zr"V � � JOLLY ASSOCIATES PHOTOMETRY ANILYSiS PERFORMED BY ARO4'TEC"AL AREA UGHnHO NC. rse" sVtuRs idsr i vi icRcs /ZymmDdS LGVD ZAXZOX R/r9r ar IA15/ SITE PLAN oROM: Q-6 DATE- 'P'°L °' 2003 S. B. COLLINS u.IF•,-_SO,�LE p#C/ED' °•"i SHELBURNE ROAD GRAPHIC SCALE 20 10 0 20 40 00 00 100 03/03/03 WED 15:47 FAX RECESSEQ Molikir CAMOff LIGHT CONSTELLATION Q001 P.s.eYor Z/1� Vftt-" r *M~ ■OWW&M Pme oourat R�.�..•m +ram awbat caeow"Fas a rt42 M" ��_ WM4 I � 1 Fr.w�+o - ao4E'2, T f '. / T To� mftw-o cro Amftk*w Rim klmrw +y w �Ba} /Ff-MM.1-n °'ttta...irAffn Opomw DruP \ LAmp (MdWad) r Lw.a FVran Tw,pded Flu GIB= L UM raem or P W"Gto Olstyd awmal—W Slfwm SeWW to Lfta Fvrt,e Pb"dwd Mco" OWE" SPEC-7 WATTAGE CATAM # / 1 Fig gilt 2" PSMH CRSG20-(3)(k) 250W PSMIA CRs6254*1(0) 30CW PSMH C01MMA1(a}-- - ¢ 32OW PSMH CR302101)) ¢ 11W PSh" a b ¢ 4COW PSUR CRS&W2KW PATTERNED LM 20OW PSW CR=0-(a)Z(b) 25OW PSIIi CRS62501M) 300W PSL§i CRS630-1a1z(b) ¢ RMS PSW CRSM-{a)ZM 35OW PSMH CRS635-(a1ZID1 ¢ 40OW PSWi CW,64GJ9jZ(b) spa* (a) WWO i M rlp = I R MdMW VWkM am teak Canopy hmlirtaim for HID lamp, totally enclosed. Flo MhV is seamless, die-cast atumkwift 5uilable for use is single or double skin canopies w1h 1 Z or 1 G wide panels. Designed for canopies of 19 gauge to 22 gauge (ma%rmlprt 0.040r tc4wss). The t"ndure is semi -recessed through a 9' diameter hole in the ca Wy. The lens fmrm is below the canopy with the betake of hoasstp and transtorraer above the campy. The fbUre housing includes a 2' weather resistant power canduttfor easy aitachmem to the rero:B ballast ras4utnent 13aAad comparimefd is secured to Ute high-rlbs of the canopy deck wiM 114 Tbk screws (by uttwrsk Brightened, arwdi2bd alumlnum symmetrical retlactur adsaves fES 'full cutoff' and Is enclosed with a d'ie-cast lens frame that hinges open, tools free, for easy cle+aniK or relamping. Axttu'e is available with der flat tempered glass lens, pattered flat tempered Bass ism, or bUnlSlilcde glass drop Prismatic Ions; al riClcone sealed to the lens tram. The optiical 3y*m provides highly eiiuieM dist(hadon v4ula cor► doling glare. " Wtw Hatt or pattemed lens are used. WATUGE t1RlW LIM CATALOGSPEC 200W PSMH Cry-(awh) 2" PSMH GR5625{1)A(h) 3WW PSMH CR3630{zAM 4 32OW PsUR CRS632-(a)�b1 _ ¢ 3510W PSM" CIRS635r14l8lb1 ¢ 4WW PSIIH CR3640-JzRbj Se.nry ta) vor sx 3 (W ova ¢ nea,ced WnVWpa ®u term. M 120R1M4aUN tsbna.rd) T I=77734-N (Carla Onyl Do 50 Hz CZto-,2401it (Can W Fadorji For voaop. M.Meb ft a,&& tie HE +Md (based; SO 50WA W-9 Of ram.d ywr Ruud usnnar arSrtat 1Cac SYSoaY DMID�c Fixture includes clear, awgul-base lamp. 320 - 400 MW utilize the EMS reduced envelope lamp. Pulse -rated Wvdain enclosed, screw- snell-type lamphoider we spring loaded center corrtatt and harp OM M1rlimU97 WC temperature supply wire required. Low %rniWr lnduded. All ballast aswinNes are Idgtt-pvwer fader and use the fellow" 61=k types CWA — ConsLYnt W=pe ArrtooV�t 200 - 409W PSMH US 5,927,M3 - bv-I gp2- 52�t-�5�a (b) apnoys (factory-iostal(ed; Ty%n Vlow Exclusive DebGuarda' Ttnish featuras an E-coat epoxy primer * ttt white acrylic powder topcoat, providing a msoant nesistanoe to corrosion, uttis kAd degradadlon and abr an. The )ir h is cavered by our seven-jear limited warranty. ,, ANSI tamp waktage label supplied, vislNe during relamping. UL Listed in US and Canada for wet locations and eaeiusure classified IPGS (lumitalre onlyl per IEC 529 and I£C 593. CAA -MCC Malco Cutt M Tod` GAA-QT t)pettin9 ivot (Nu S" CAR-R1S Nkmpwg StIa - (indudes vinyl coated lets to LK-Cli Clay Rat lens (Exttalteplacamaot) LK-MZ Pattered Flat Lens (EEaFalreplar�ment) LK-CRA Grasp Prismalk tens (a nftW=merO - 125W RPM drill required (by otb«a). 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, MscorLsin 53406-3772 USA PN010E (262) 8W1904 FAX (262) 684-3309 0 RM LVWq b- NoW In USA www.m,w&;;hnrC-cm 1111SM2 RUi1D LIGHTf NG 03/05/03 WED 15:47 FAX 14002 RECEMP MO COOPY Mr CONSTELLATION lot Lt1tDt tow SW Mlal Hsiide anir 32C WA 10"--'% 1t . r1m UMM oi"i .to Dlstawl; V (10 m) )trod Tat Aepwt Ltyhtiap Wei iw- Ne. LSI 13977 Zavid Lemmas aut romCBlllal " can laaee —� `co . ttast M a519 27LO 0.57 lm0e _s is aqp eea uL___ a•1a ��_2'(.15 Nut— tones r.—.J.— n.§.J_ rMe.w ... A&M" $MITI RUUD " t LIGHTING Pattemed Laos pubs Stud MOW Heride L .ma 320 Welt tDow) - 34M kwong LAMC Rat Soft am Tani Dlstama 30 (10 m) Qudkd Test Pap= Llgbdw Scalnols t.t No. L5114.9oS Zonal Lomas aid Pet"en ' M UMMM ■ a-M 7Ma `aa 13214 311jrse.6s q 2"M Ot t a-ec � 1Q4 �RtaO _ W74 26.1Y ro.a 1700 tcoe 9D-180 0 m aJo Q.180 2 n r00.0- Drop leas Pulse Slarl wtal hand@ Ljmp.- 32D IM, (CW - 34.0W lumens Lrns, OfW Prkmatk Ghss Tut DMWaee_ 3& (1 D N Cerfrfied Test Report: LlphW* SeWK Inc. Na LS114281 7sual LnmwM aed Pecesda r �aa A m 11�� W ?mo e6.38 E 4t18o InS3 22-M 9t:49_ B5lA 1799 szr . �_ a-wo s6ff., La!qj Lunn Ceireautt Fad= Rind L;lnV 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wsconsin 534c&3',,"2 USA PHONE (262) 8851900 FAX (262) 884-33D5 ..,.�A-^ 6 Ruud U*ff a Inc. Printed in USA www.rvad")flp.eom 4l? UCM ANG H3 SLA7 PR4-4R14 �s UCM SR STR H3 SLA20A DB6-4R14 UNIVERSE COLLFCTIO' Introducing the third generation of the Universe Collection", from AAL. A complete family of decorative, y=: functional luminaires that transcend architectural styles past and present. The fixtures are scaled in three sizes with more forms and configurations t give you an expanded design palette. UCS SR STR WST COP UCA' LUM STR H5 f;7:; : a -124 D86-4R10 UCM ANG OAL CUS TOM ARM ARCH!TECTUR4L AREA L IGHTIN: U C S U N I V E R S E C O N L L E C T I OLuminous Element ���3Lamp/BaHast ANG ANGLED SHADE I 50MH WND 3 WINDOWS ® 50 watt metal halide 120/277 volt ballast. Use medium base, clear ED- 17 lamps. Cast frame with a diffused 70MH acrylic lens 14"/355MM DIAMETER 70 watt metal halide multitap ballast 5.25"/130MM DIAMETER 4.75"/120MM HIGH 120/208/240/277 volt. Use medium 2.5"/65MM HIGH I base, clear ED-17 lamps. 70MHT6 70 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/277 volt. Uses a G 12 base, clear T-6 ceramic MH lamp. 50HPS 50 watt high pressure sodium ballast 120/277 volt. Use medium SR SOLID RINGS ,yj BEL BELL SHADE base, clear ED-17 lamps. 70HPS 70 watt high pressure sodium ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. Use Cast rings with a diffused AinkI medium base, clear ED-17 lamps. acrylic lens 42CF 7.25"/185MM DIAMETER 15"/380MM DIAMETER 42 watt T-4 compact fluorescent, 4 pin, 120/277 volt electronic ballast. 3"/75MM HIGH j 4.75"/120MM HIGH Also compatible with 26 & 32 watt 4 pin lamps. VSL VERTICAL SLATS Cast frame with a diffused acrylic lens 5.25"/130MM DIAMETER 2.5"/65MM HIGH LUM LUMINOUS RINGS Edge lit acrylic rings with a diffused acrylic lens 7.257185MM DIAMETER 1.5732MM HIGH 20 AF:�HITECTLIRAL AREA LIGHTING FLR FLARED SHADE 15"/380MM DIAMETER 4.75"/120MM HIGH STIR STRAIGHT Sr-:ADE 16"/405MM DIAME-ER 3.12"/80MM HIGH All ballasts are factory wired for 277 volts. Lamps not included. 4Color/Hood Finish WHT WHITE BILK BLACK DGN DARK GREEN DBZ DARK BRONZE GAL GALVANIZED VGR VERDE GREEN CRT CORTEN MAL MATTE ALUMINUM i All standard AAL colors are provided at no extra charge. See color chips and i hood finishes on page 25. RAL and custom matched colors are available upon request. COP Copper Hood STS Stainless Steel Hood 5 Options 347 120/240/347 volt ballast for HID lamp/ballast except the 50 HIPS which is a 347 volt ballast. � ^i1VERSE C 0 L L E C T I C N D Consult your AAL catalog for complete details on weight and load limits as well as windloading information. v 11, 6�21 BASE CATALOG NUMBER W D131 D62 1363 DB4 DB5 ®) BASE HEIGHT 34"(865MM) 50"(1270MM) 30"(760MM) 42"(1065MM) 17"(431MM) BASE DIAMETER 12" (305MM) 20" (510MM) 18" (460MM) 18" (460MM) 14" (355MM) BOLT CIRCLE 8.75"(220MM) 16"(405MM) 14"(355MM) 14"(355MM) 8.75"(220MM) POLE SHAFT 4"(102mm) ROUND SHAFT 10' TO 16' 10' To 16' 10' To 16' 10' TO 16' (3M TO 5m) (3M TO 5m) (3M TO 5m) (3M TO 5m) 4"(102MM) FLUTED SHAFT 10' TO 16' 10' TO 16' 10' TO 16' 10' TO 16' (3M TO 5m) (3M TO 5m) (31VI TO 5m) (3M To 5m) 5"(102MM) ROUND SHAFT 12' To 20' 12' To 20' 12' To 20' 5"(102mm) FLUTED SHAFT 42 :HITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING .5M To 6.1 M) (3.5M To 6.1 M) (3.5M To 6.1 12' To 20' 12' TO 20' 12' TO 20' (3.51VI TO 6.1 M) (3.5M TO 6.1 M) (3.5M.To 6.1 M) SPECIFICATIONS Bases shall be cast aluminum. Aluminum shall be certified as pure #356 alloy, free of any porosity, foreign materials, or cos- metic fillers. Base casting shall be heat treated to a T-6 condi- tion.. and of uniform wall thickness, with no warping or mold shiftiing. Minimum wall thickness shall be .250". The base cast- ing shall have internal rings and sleeves to accept the pole shaf�. Pole shaft shall be seated and circumferentially welded around the outside of the base and internally where the pole is seated into the base casting. The anchor bolt locations in the base shall be cast in place, as part of the base casting, for mammum strength. Pole shaft shall be seamless extruded 6063 T-6 aluminum. Cast aluminum access cover shall be gasl<.eted and secured with two tamper proof, stainless steel A llls FOR WALL MOUNTING Wall mounted arms compliment the pole mounted arms and are designed for both the UCM and UCL fixtures. The fix- tures are mounted with the same 3 point mounting system. All arms are prewired with a quick connector for easy installa- tion. Hardware for attaching to the wall surface is by others. The back plate mounting holes are .438"(11 mm) diame- ter. Use a minimum of 3/8-16 stainless steel fasteners. Seal the back plate to the wall surface with an appropriate silicone caulk. 6 in 152 mm 6 in 152 mm 20.0 in 500 mm \ t 24.0 in 610 mm WMA 8 Backplate is 12"(305mm) x 6"(150mm) Weight: 10 lbs. 6 in 152 mm 112in 38 -nm il 670 mm go i L WMA 12 Backplate is 12"(305mm) x 6"(150mm). Weight: 12 lbs. 32 A.RCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 6 in 152 mm HL� 5 in -T 127 mm WMA 11 Backplate is 26"(660mm) x 6"(150mm) Weight: 10 lbs. 44.0 in 1120 mm L 28.0 in 710 mm WMA 16 Backplate is 44"(1120mm) x 6"(150mm) Weight: 22 lbs. 0 •-........-+- -.. ...e..-.++....._�T�-- ._.._ .-_..._... ._. .-_........ _._ -_..- .--__-• ..r.. :- _.....-�.t.._....-. �_..__�...--.; �--"ter-+-....-...-�.-_•Y T- 7 "T U C L U N I V I R E C O L L E C T I C N E 4 5 I,t ��� Finish 175MH Standard AAL colors are provided 175 watt metal halide multitap ballast at no ext;-a charge. 120/208/240/277 volt. Use mogul base, clear ED-28 lamps. Use POMB RAL and custom matched colors lamps for reflector models. are available upon request. 250MH 250 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. Use mogul base, clear ED-28 lamps. Use POMB lamps for reflector models. 40OMH 0 WHT BILK watt metal halide multitap ballast WHITE BLACK 120/208/240/277 volt. Use mogul base, clear ED-28 lamps. Use POMB - lamps for reflector models. 150HPS 150 watt high pressure sodium ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. Use mogul base, clear ED-231/2 lamps. 250HPS 250 watt high pressure sodium ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. Use mogul base, clear ED-18 lamps. 400HPS 400 watt high pressure sodium ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. Use mogul base, clear ED-18 lamps. IL-85 85 watt, Phillips Induction Lamp sys- tem with transformer. Specify 120, 208, 240 or 277 volt. IL-165 165 watt, Phillips Induction Lamp system with transformer. Specify 120, 208, 240 or 277 volt. All ballasts are factory wired for 277 volts. Lamps not included. LUMINOUS RING COLORS Internal lens can be added for color on the ring edges when illuminated. BL BLUE RD RED GRN GREEN � MG MAGENTA � DGN DBZ DARK GREEN DARK BRONZE GALV VGR GALVANIZED VERDE GREEN CRT MAL CORTEN MATTE ALUMINUM HOOD FINISHES All styles of hoods are available in the matching fixture color, stainless steel or natural copper finishes. The natural copper and stainless steel hoods are unfinished to develop a patina over time. All hoods for OAL and GR3/5 optics have the underside finished in high reflectance white. STS COP STAINLESS COPPER STEEL Arms are on page 32-37 Poles are on page 38-43 PM POST TOP MOUNT For OAL optics option only. Not available for reflector models. Slips over a 4'7100MM pole. Secured with 6 s.s. set screws. QRS Quartz restrike controller 7 25.4 in 645 mm and socket for a T-4 mini-cand halogen lamp, maximum 150 watt. Reflector models only. QL Socket for a T 4 mini-cand halogen lamp. Must be field wired to a separate 120 volt circuit. Maximum 150 watt, HID only. Reflector models only. PSB Pulse start ballast for 175MH, 250 MH, and 40OMH (120/208/240/277 volt) metal halide Provides faster reignition of the lamp, longer life, and better color rendition. (175MH not available for reflector models with horizontal lamp) 347 120/240/347 volt ballast for HID lamp/ballast PMS Pendant mount with 48'71220 mm and canopy with swivel. Stem and canopy painted white. ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 29 CONVERSION FACTOR The values below are in initial footcandles. Discount val- is LAMP TYPE LUMENS A B C Lies to account for light losses due to voltage, temperature �,0 MH, CLEAR E-17 3200 1.00 .313 .20 and atmospheric variations which affect light output. 70 MH, CLEAR E-17 5200 1.63 .61 .33 To substitute another lamp in the isocandle charts below, 1 or) MH, CLEAR E-17 8500 1.00 .53 multiply the chart values by the lamp conversion factor on the 150 MH, CLEAR E-17 12500 .78 left. Mounting height is to the lamp center. 175 MH, CLEAR E-17 12000 .75 All testing performed by a certified independent laboratory. Photometry is available in IES formatted files on CD Rom & 50 HPS, CLEAR E-17 3600 1.13 .42 .23 Website. Call your local AAL representative for a copy. 70 HPS, CLEAR E-17 6400 2.00 .75 .40 100 HPS, CLEAR E-17 9500 1.12 .59 15r. HPS, CLEAR E-17 16000 1.00 Note If using a lamp with different lumen output than listed above, consult AAL for conversion factor. UCS ANG 50MH USE CONVERSION COLUMN A UCM H3 150HPS USE CONVERSION COLUMN C 10' 12' 14' 16' 2.00 1.38 1.02 .78 1.00 .69 .51 .39 .50 .35 .26 .20 .20 .14 .10 .08 10' MOUNTING HEIGHT one grid square equals one mounting height 1 2 3 4 5 6 UCM ANG OAL 10OMH USE CONVERSION COLUMN B 12' 14' 16' 18' 2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20 1.36 1.00 .77 .60 .68 .50 .39 .30 .27 .20 .15 .12 14' MOUNTING HEIGHT one grid square equals one mounting height 1 2 3 4 5 6 UCM H2 150HPS E-17 USE CONVERSION COLUMN C 14' MOUNTING HEIGHT one grid square equals one mounting height 12' 14' 16' 18' 6.80 5.00 3.85 3.00 2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20 1.361.00 .77 .60 .68 .50 .39 .30 .27 .20 .15 .12 44 1 2 3 4 5 6 14' MOUNTING HEIGHT one grid square equals one mounting height 12' 14' 16' 18' 6.80 5.00 3.85 3.00 2.72 2.001.54 1.20 1.36 1.00 .77 .60 .68 .50 .39 .30 .27 .20 .15 .12 1 2 3 4 5 6 UCM H4 150HPS USE CONVERSION COLUMN C 14' MOUNTING HEIGHT one grid square equals one mounting height 12' 14' 16' 18' II6.80 5.00 3.85 3.00 2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20 1.36 1.00 .77 .60 .68 .50 .39 .30 .27 .20 .15 .12 1 2 3 4 5 6 UCM H5 150HPS USE CONVERSION COLUMN C 1,' MOUNTING HEIGHT ore grid square equals ore mounting height 12' 14' 16' 18' 6.80 5.00 3.85 3.00 2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20 1.36 1.00 .77 .60 .68 .50 .39 .30 .27 .20 .15 .12 0 State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION 103 South Main Street v West Building 05676-0404 FAX 802-241-3296 TEL 802-241-3888 Donna Kinville, City Clerk Town of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 March 31, 2003 RE: Public Notice for Correction Action at Shelburne Road Mobil- North SMS Site #941589 Dear Ms. Kinville: The Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, Sites Management Section (SMS) is providing notice to the City of South Burlington of a proposed correction action plan at the Shelburne Road Mobil — North facility located on Shelburne Road. Ongoing environmental investigations at this site indicate significant soil and groundwater contamination exists beneath this property due to past releases from underground storage tanks that stored petroleum products. Enclosed with this letter is a public notice (Executive Summary) and a copy of both the November 2000 and Revised March 2003 Corrective Action Plan (CAP) . The SMS asks that you post this letter and the notice on a public bulletin board in the municipal office for two weeks. Please retain the copy of this CAP for public review. Any comments pertaining to this proposed CAP should be submitted in writing by Wednesday, April 16, 2003 to: Linda Elliott Waste Management Division 103 South Main Street / West Office Building Waterbury, VT 05671-0404 (802) 241-3897 lindae@dec.anr.state.vt.us Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury PUBLIC NOTICE This Corrective Action Plan (CAP) presents a strategy to remediate subsurface petroleum contamination at the Shelburne Road Mobil North site in South Burlington, Vermont (SMS Site #94-1589). The CAP presented herein is a revised and updated version of the original CAP for this site submitted in November of 2000. This original CAP (CAP1) was developed following on -site pilot testing of several remedial alternatives, and it contains a significant amount of useful and valid information on both the site conditions, and various remedial approaches to address the soil and groundwater contamination that exist. A great deal of prior investigative and monitoring work completed at the site was synthesized into this original CAP. Accordingly, in order to avoid repetition of previously submitted information, CAP1 will be referenced often in this document, which should be considered a companion to the original plan. The reason for developing a revised CAP is twofold: nearly two and a half years after the original plan was submitted, considerable subsurface contamination persists at the site. In addition, the site owner plans to undertake significant renovations at the property, to include relocating the underground storage tanks (USTs), excavation for the foundation of a new building, and other work involving contaminated soil. In light of these plans additional remedial alternatives to address the site contamination have been considered and are included in this revised CAP. Historical releases of petroleum have impacted soil and groundwater at the site, as well as indoor air quality. The petroleum releases are associated with multiple generations of underground storage tanks and petroleum dispensers used at the site for many years. Weathered, floating free -phase product has been found in three groundwater monitoring wells at the site. Petroleum constituents are present in site groundwater at concentrations far exceeding Vermont Groundwater Enforcement Standards. Groundwater contamination has been —detected in monitoring wells on neighboring properties downgradient from the site, and data also indicate that groundwater contamination originating from upgradient properties has ikigrated onto the site. Petroleum vapors were detected in the site building in 1998 and a vapor abatement system was installed at that time. Site investigation efforts have included the installation of numerous groundwater monitoring wells, extensive monitoring and sampling of these wells, recovery of free -phase product (by bailing), installation and operation of the vapor abatement system, and pilot testing of soil vapor extraction (SVE) and high vacuum extraction and treatment (HEAT) technologies. Four remedial alternatives were evaluated againstthe objectives of removing gross contamination from the subsurface, and preventing the migration and accumulation of petroleum vapors in current and future site buildings. These alternatives include: the installation of a HEAT or other dual -phase extraction (DPE) and treatment system; periodic use of a mobile HEAT system or other similar DPE technology; the installation of a conventional, low-vacuum2 soil vapor extraction (SVE) system; and bulk excavation of contaminated soil coupled with off -site transport and disposal Based on the pilot test data, either a conventional SVE system or periodic use of a mobile HEAT (or other DPE system) appears capable of meeting the remedial objectives at largely similar costs. An SVE system will remove gross contamination from the subsurface and prevent the accumulation of petroleum vapors in the site building. Periodic visits with a mobile HEAT or other DPE system could be equally effective in removing gross contamination, and more effective ' "High -vacuum Exhaction And Treat nwf, acronym coined by Handex ofNew Jersey, Inc. 2 Less than 60 inches ofwater column STRATTON FRENCH, CGWP PAGE 1 CONSULTING HYDROLOGIST in addressing groundwater contamination than an SVE system. While the costs for periodic visits by a mobile HEAT unit are slightly higher than an SVE system (3%), this increase could be justified given the added benefits provided by more directly addressing site groundwater contamination as well as avoiding the inevitable disruption of commercial activities at the property during trench installation for vapor transmission lines. The bulk excavation and off -site transport of petroleum contaminated soil affords immediate removal of the contaminated materials responsible for both the migration and accumulation of petroleum vapors in site buildings, and off -site migration of groundwater contamination. This remedial alternative costs approximately 19% more than the mobile HEAT/DPE system, yet by definition goes the furthest towards actually removing gross contamination from the subsurface. This option removes site contamination in a rapid manner measured in days as opposed to the years associated with the three other alternatives. In addition, this method takes advantage of the site owner's plans for significant renovation to the property this spring, when considerable subsurface excavation will be occurring anyway. As such, the site owner is amenable to incurring added costs over and above the planned renovation project in order to assist in corrective action efforts and satisfy the remedial objectives. This remedial option could be implemented immediately. The fourth remedial alternative, a permanent installation of a HEAT or other dual -phase extraction treatment system, is the most expensive of the options evaluated (approximately 17% higher than soil excavation), and likely the most disruptive to future site activities. Based on an analysis of the four remedial alternatives, the following remedial approach is recommended for the Shelburne Road Mobil North site in South Burlington: corrective action should be pursued consisting of the bulk excavation and off -site transport and treatment of petroleum contaminated soil. This remedial effort should be implemented in conjunction with the site owners' plans for significant renovation to the property, to occur in mid April, 2003. A timeline for this corrective action activity is included. STRATTON FRENCH, CGWP PAGE 2 CONSULTING HYDROLOGIST Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 1831 Lightening Ridge Road Phone/Fax: (802) 454 - 4636 Plainfield, Vermont 05667 Email: tfrench@surfglobal.net CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (REVISED AND UPDATED) Shelburne Road Mobil North South Burlington, Vermont SMS Site #94-1589 March 2003 Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (REVISED AND UPDATED) SHELBURNE ROAD MOBIL NORTH SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT SMS Site #94-1589 March 2003 Prepared for: Mr. Carl Ruprecht UST Manager S.B. Collins, Inc. 54 Lower Welden Street St. Albans, VT 05478 (802) 527 - 0116 Prepared by: Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 1831 Lightening Ridge Road Plainfield, VT 05667 (802) 454 - 4636 WAT' � c q� 041025 �7 Stratton French !� 12/31/03 Qti' Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist ! STRATTON FRENCH, CGWP CONSULTING HYDROLOGIST TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................1 1.0 GENERAL SITE INFORMATION............................................................................ 3 1.1 Background Information................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Potential Receptors........................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Previous Investigations & Reports................................................................................. 3 1.4 Site Renovation Plans.................................................................................................... 3 2.0 SITE CHARACTERIZATION DATA...........................................................................4 2.1 Hydrogeologic Setting................................................................................................... 4 Stratigraphy............................................................................................................ 4 Groundwater Levels, Flow Directions, and Flow Rates ........................................ 4 2.2 Source, Degree and Extent of Petroleum Contamination .............................................. 5 SourceAreas.......................................................................................................... 5 Degree & Extent of Contamination....................................................................... 5 2.3 Remedial Alternatives Evaluated by Feasibility Investigations .................................... 6 3.0'. PROPOSED REMEDIAL STRATEGY.........................................................................9 3 3.1 Conceptual Strategy 3.2 Remedial Alternatives.................................................................................................... 9 General Discussion of Alternatives....................................................................... 9 3.3 Recommendations..............................................................................................:.........10 STRATTON FRENCH, CGWP CONSULTING HYDROLOGIST ILIST OF TABLES TABLE A Groundwater Level Data TABLE B Groundwater Sampling Results for November 21, 2002 TABLE C Costs Associated with Soil Excavation Alternative TABLE D Cost Estimate for Annual Groundwater Sampling TABLE E Summary of Preliminary Cost Estimates for Remedial Alternatives TABLE F List of Contractors and Interested Parties LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE A Site Map Showing Proposed Renovations FIGURE B Water -Table Map, November 21, 2002 FIGURE C I MTBE Isoconcentration Contour Map, November 21, 2002 FIGURE D Benzene Isoconcentration Contour Map, November 21, 2002 FIGURE E Total 8260M Compound Isoconcentration Map, November 21, 2002 FIGURE F Total 8260M Compound Isoconcentration Map (11/21/02) and Approximate Area of Proposed Soil Excavation APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 Water Quality Data Summaries for each Monitoring Well APPENDIX 2 March 27, 2003 Letter from Carl Ruprecht, SBC, to Chuck Schwer and Linda Elliot, VT DEC, SMS STRATTON FRENCH, CGWP CONSULTING HYDROLOGIST This Corrective Action Plan (CAP) presents a strategy to remediate subsurface petroleum contamination at the Shelburne Road Mobil North site in South Burlington, Vermont (SMS Site #94-1589). The CAP presented herein is a revised and updated version of the original CAP for this site submitted in November of 2000. This original CAP (CAP1) was developed following on -site pilot testing of several remedial alternatives, and it contains a significant amount of useful and valid information on both the site conditions, and various remedial approaches to address the soil and groundwater contamination that exist. A great deal of prior investigative and monitoring work completed at the site was synthesized into this original CAP. Accordingly, in order to avoid repetition of previously submitted information, CAP1 will be referenced often in this document, which should be considered a companion to the original plan. The reason for developing a revised CAP is twofold: nearly two and a half years after the original plan was submitted, considerable subsurface contamination persists at the site. In addition, the site owner plans to undertake significant renovations at the property, to include relocating the underground storage tanks (USTs), excavation for the foundation of a new building, and other work involving contaminated soil. In light of these plans additional remedial alternatives to address the site contamination have been considered and are included in this revised CAP. Historical releases of petroleum have impacted soil and groundwater at the site, as well as indoor air quality. The petroleum releases are associated with multiple generations of underground storage tanks and petroleum dispensers used at the site for many years. Weathered, floating free -phase product has been found in three groundwater monitoring wells at the site. Petroleum constituents are present in site groundwater at concentrations far exceeding Vermont Groundwater Enforcement Standards. Groundwater contamination has beetl,..detected in monitoring wells on neighboring properties downgradient from the site, and data also indicate that groundwater contamination originating from upgradient properties has ikiigrated onto the site. Petroleum vapors were detected in the site building in 1998 and a vapor abatement system was installed at that time. Site investigation efforts have included the installation of numerous groundwater monitoring wells, extensive monitoring and sampling of these wells, recovery of free -phase product (by bailing), installation and operation of the vapor abatement system, and pilot testing of soil vapor extraction (SVE) and high vacuum extraction and treatment (HEAT) technologies. Four remedial alternatives were evaluated against the objectives of removing gross contamination from the subsurface, and preventing the migration and accumulation of petroleum vapors in current and future site buildings. These alternatives include: the installation of a HEAT or other dual -phase extraction (DPE) and treatment system; periodic use of a mobile HEAT system or other similar DPE technology; the installation of a conventional, low-vacuum2 soil vapor extraction (SVE) system; and bulk excavation of contaminated soil coupled with off -site transport and disposal. Based on the pilot test data, either a conventional SVE system or periodic use of a mobile HEAT (or other DPE system) appears capable of meeting the remedial objectives at largely similar costs. An SVE system will remove gross contamination from the subsurface and prevent the accumulation of petroleum vapors in the site building. Periodic visits with a mobile HEAT or other DPE system could be equally effective in removing gross contamination, and more effective "High -vacuum Ext acuon And TrealmenY', acronym coined by Handex ofNew Jersey, Inc. Z Less than 60 inches ofwater column STRATTON FRENCH, CGWP PAGE 1 CONSULTING HYDROLOGIST in addressing groundwater contamination than an SVE system. While the costs for periodic visits by a mobile HEAT unit are slightly higher than an SVE system (3%), this increase could be justified given the added benefits provided by more directly addressing site groundwater contamination as well as avoiding the inevitable disruption of commercial activities at the property during trench installation for vapor transmission lines. The bulk excavation and off -site transport of petroleum contaminated soil affords immediate removal of the contaminated materials responsible for both the migration and accumulation of petroleum vapors in site buildings, and off -site migration of groundwater contamination. This remedial alternative costs approximately 19% more than the mobile HEAT/DPE system, yet by definition goes the furthest towards actually removing gross contamination from the subsurface. This option removes site contamination in a rapid manner measured in days as opposed to the years associated with the three other alternatives. In addition, this method takes advantage of the site owner's plans for significant renovation to the property this spring, when considerable subsurface excavation will be occurring anyway. As such, the site owner is amenable to incurring added costs over and above the planned renovation project in order to assist in corrective action efforts and satisfy the remedial objectives. This remedial option could be implemented immediately. The fourth remedial alternative, a permanent installation of a HEAT or other dual -phase extraction treatment system, is the most expensive of the options evaluated (approximately 17% higher than soil excavation), and likely the most disruptive to future site activities. Based on an analysis of the four remedial alternatives, the following remedial approach is recommended for the Shelburne Road Mobil North site in South Burlington: corrective action should be pursued consisting of the bulk excavation and off -site transport and treatment of petroleum contaminated soil. This remedial effort should be implemented in conjunction with the site owners' plans for significant renovation to the property, to occur in mid April, 2003. A timeline for this corrective action activity is included. 3 STRATTON FRENCH, CGWP PAGE 2 CONSULTING HYDROLOGIST Throughout this CAP, reference will be made to the previous corrective action plan (CAP I) and, where appropriate, the figures and tables included in it. This previous plan was developed and submitted by Hoffer Consulting Inc. in November of 2000. Any new or revised figure or table included in this CAP will be organized in alphabetical order (e.g. Figure A, Figure B, Table A, etc.) to distinguish it from previously submitted graphical or tabular information in CAP I, which has been organized in numerical order. 1.1 Background Information An excellent discussion covering the history of the site, its ownership, petroleum distribution activities and equipment, and neighboring properties is included in section 1.1 of CAP 1. No additional pertinent information needs to be added to this previous background section, or to section 1.2 — Environmental Setting. 1.2 Potential Receptors Potential receptors of site contamination identified in CAP1 include water supplies, indoor air quality in the site building (convenience store) and nearby structures on adjacent properties, surface water features, and neighboring properties (with owners listed in section 1.3 of CAP 1). The only additional potential receptor that should be considered is the indoor air quality in any future site buildings constructed as part of future planned site renovations. 1.3 Previous Investigations & Reports Several investigative efforts and numerous monitoring episodes have occurred at this site since 1994. These efforts culminated in pilot testing of various remedial options in the summer of 2000, and generation of the first corrective action plan the following fall. In addition to the reports listed in section 1.4 of CAP 1, groundwater quality has been monitoring throughout site on a quarterly basis since this document was submitted. The dates of these reports include: March 16, 2001; June 1, 2001; August 2 0, 2001; January 31, 2001; April 5, 2002; and July 30, 2002. The most recent groundwater sampling activities occurred at the site on November 21, 2002. This information is presented in a report dated January 13, 2003. All of the previous investigations and reports have been conducted and developed by Hoffer Consulting Inc. 1.4 Site Renovation Plans The property owner (Jolley & Associates) has developed plans for a significant renovation of a large portion of the Shelburne Road Mobil North site. The existing site building is to be razed, USTs will be removed from the ground, recertified and relocated, and considerable excavation of subsurface materials will be undertaken in order to place a foundation for a full basement associated with a larger building to be constructed along the western edge of the current paved area. In addition, the paved portion of the site will be expanded to the west approximately 40 feet. Figure A presents a site basemap showing these proposed changes. This work is scheduled to commence in April of 2003. STRATTON FRENCH, CGWP PAGE 3 CONSULTING HYDROLOGIST 2.1 Hydrogeologic Setting Stratigraphy Twenty-seven groundwater -monitoring wells have been installed in the unconsolidated sediments underneath the site. Soil samples collected during the monitoring well drilling efforts expose a surficial layer of fill materials from ground surface to several feet deep on the subject property, and to a few feet deep on the adjacent properties. This surficial layer consists of generally fine-grained sand with some angular gravel. Presumably these materials were used to establish a surface for construction during the initial development of the properties. Native undisturbed soil at the site is generally fine-grained, consistent with the mapped surficial geology of the region. The general soil profile includes a fining downward sequence, starting with generally yellowish -brown fine sand and silty sand, with the silt content increasing with depth. A transition into gray marine clay occurs at depths ranging from about eight to twelve feet below the ground surface. Subtle differences can be observed in the soil profiles due to the proximity of utilities and other underground structures. Logs for all site monitoring wells are compiled in Appendix A of CAP I. Perpendicular cross sections through the property were generated as Figures 4 and 5 of CAP 1, and illustrate the subsurface conditions described above, as well as the high and low water table positions documented in site wells. Groundwater Levels, Flow Directions, and Flow Rates The water -table surface occurs at depths ranging from four to eight feet below grade beneath the property. Seasonal fluctuation of groundwater levels average about one to two feet in most of the wells. Table A presents groundwater level data for all site monitoring wells, and includes a graphical indication of the fluctuating water table from 1995 through 2002. As illustrated on the cross section figures and well logs, the zone of saturation occurs within silty fine sand and silt. The underlying marine clay forms a lower -permeability base to the overlying fine sand and silt. Although no wells at the site provide data on vertical gradients, the lower permeability of the underlying marine clay likely results in a predominantly horizontal flow pattern. Figure B is a water -table map for November 21, 2002, the most recent previous monitoring date. The water table configuration depicted on Figure B is representative of historical data on groundwater flow direction at the site. The overall flow direction through the site is northwestward toward Potash Brook. Along the southwestern portion of the site, the flow direction diverges to the southwest. The mound -like radial flow ' pattern on the western portion of the site property may reflect the fact that the western portion of the site consists of fill materials, probably five to ten feet higher in elevation than surrounding native grade. STRATTON FRENCH, CGWP PAGE 4 CONSULTING HYDROLOGIST STRATTON FRENCH, CGWP The average linear flow velocity of groundwater has been estimated in previous reports to be in the range of 2 to 10 feet per year, based on slug testing of site monitoring wells (average hydraulic conductivity of 5.0 x 10"5 cm/sec). When compared to the widespread extent of the contaminant plume, this estimate appears to be low. 2.2 Source Areas, Degree and Extent of Petroleum Contamination Source Areas Groundwater and soil sampling data over the years at the site has indicated the widespread persistence of dissolved petroleum compounds in groundwater, originating from several source areas. One known source area of petroleum releases was the location of the USTs removed in 1993 (see Figure A), which led to the initial site investigation of the property and installation of monitoring wells. Several additional monitoring wells were installed in 1998 after petroleum vapors were detected in the site building and beneath Shelburne Road east of the property during paving operations. More site monitoring wells were installed in 1998 and 1999 to further evaluate downgradient contamination, and during 1999 and 2000 to further delineate the extent of contamination, and to facilitate corrective action pilot testing efforts. Petroleum compounds have been consistently detected in groundwater monitoring wells located along Shelburne Road, the upgradient portion of the site. Three wells have contained small accumulations of free -phase product in the past (MW-4, MW-12, and MW-26), although only one of these currently exhibits any product (MW-14). MTBE has been detected in MW-1 since this well was first sampled in 1993. This well is positioned along the eastern and upgradient edge of the site. Wells installed more recently along Shelburne Road (MW-15, 16, & 17) have also shown petroleum compounds in groundwater, suggesting that a source of contamination exists off -site in the upgradient direction to the east. The presence of petroleum contamination detected beneath Shelburne Road during paving efforts in 1998 supports this hypothesis. In summary, there are multiple potential source areas of petroleum in the subsurface at this site. CAP1 provides additional historical perspective on the potential source areas and history of petroleum releases at this site. Degree & Extent of Contamination Analytical results of the most recent round of groundwater sampling (11/21/02) are compiled on Table B. Isoconcentration contour maps for MTBE and benzene on this date are presented as Figures C and D. The MTBE and benzene isoconcentration maps show a large area of petroleum contaminated groundwater, probably representing the co - mingling of constituent plumes rather than one distinct plume. Figure E presents an isoconcentration contour map of the total 8260M compounds in groundwater at each well where a sample was obtained (on 11/21/02). This figure provides a view of the overall degree and extent of dissolved contamination in groundwater across the site. Almost the entire site exhibits dissolved petroleum constituents in groundwater. The zone of highest contamination extends from under the existing convenience store building to the northwest approximately 150 feet to wells MW-4 and MW-24, and appears to be approximately 50 — 60 feet wide in the center. The long axis of this "hot zone" trends along the groundwater flow direction in this area of the site (see Figure B). Historical water -quality data through the most recent sampling event are compiled in Appendix 1 for all monitoring wells. Contaminant concentrations have shown trends CONSULTING HYDROLOGIST PAGE 5 that illustrate the movement of different "slugs" of contamination through the site at various times. Section 2.2 of CAP1 provides several examples of this. Site characterization efforts to date have not included laboratory analyses of soil. The only data collected on soil contamination at the site has included photo -ionization detector (PID) screening of soil samples collected during soil boring efforts associated with monitoring well installation. These PID readings are included on the well logs compiled in Appendix A of CAP1; Table 1 of CAP includes the peak PID reading, and depth it was recorded, for each well location. 2.3 Estimate of Contaminant Mass Table 4 in CAP provides an estimate of the mass of petroleum in the subsurface at the site. Since, as mentioned above, there is no analytical data on soil contaminant concentrations, dissolved contaminant concentrations in groundwater (8021B compounds) have been used for the purpose of estimating contaminant mass. The total mass of 8021B compounds at the site was estimated to be approximately 16 lbs. This mass was then multiplied by a factor of 2.0 to estimate the total petroleum mass. Calculations indicate an estimated equivalent volume of 4.8 gallons of petroleum in the dissolved phase. Using a conservative estimate that the dissolved phase represents 5% to 10% of the total mass of petroleum across the site, the total mass was estimated to be 50 to 100 equivalent gallons. Note that these calculations were completed using average groundwater concentration data (collected during 2000) with an assumed five-foot vertical extent of impact (see Table 4 in CAP1). The estimated volume of petroleum recovered during the 6-hour HEAT pilot test conducted on June 8, 2000 was over five gallons (see section 2.3 and Table 5 of CAP I). As a result, the mass estimate presented above likely underestimates the total mass of petroleum in the subsurface at this site. 2A Remedial Alternatives Evaluated by Feasibility Investigations Several different remedial alternatives were evaluated during corrective action feasibility investigations conducted during the summer of 2000. The specific technologies evaluated at the site included soil vapor extraction (SVE), and high vacuum extraction and treatment (HEAT). Separate stepped pilot tests of both methods were conducted on several extraction wells to evaluate various design parameters for these technologies. Both pilot testing efforts indicated there is substantial petroleum present in the vapor phase that could be recovered with either of these methods (see CAP I). The presence of significant vapor phase contamination implies that equally significant residual petroleum contamination exists adsorbed onto the soil materials beneath the site, and serves as the source of the vapor phase contamination. The procedures and results of pilot testing efforts conducted as part of the feasibility investigations are thoroughly presented in section 2.3 of CAP1, and will not be reiterated in this document. Please refer to CAP1 for a discussion of these remedial alternatives. 2.5 Additional Remedial Alternative for Corrective Action In light of the site owner's proposed plans for significant renovation to nearly the entire developed portion of this property, an additional remedial alternative to address the stated remedial objectives has been considered. The planned site renovations, as . detailed in section 1.4, will entail considerable subsurface excavation work (relocating STRATTON FRENCH, CGWP PAGE 6 CONSULTING HYDROLOGIST USTs, placing a foundation, removing underground piping, etc.) as well as other work involving contaminated soil throughout the property. Given this site renovation plan, it is believed these activities allow for a combination of efforts to address the contaminated soil materials beneath the site, while simultaneously completing the renovations to the property. This dual approach affords the opportunity to in accomplish corrective action at this site in a relatively economical and timely fashion. Accordingly, the bulk excavation of contaminated soil, coupled with off -site transport of these materials to an out-of-state facility for thermal treatment and recycling, has been considered a viable remedial approach which addresses both the gross contamination at the site, and the migration and accumulation of soil vapors in existing and future site buildings. Responsibility for various operational components of this remedial approach can be assumed by the site owner given that renovation activities will be undertaken concurrently. Appendix 2 contains a letter dated March 27, 2003 from Carl Ruprecht at S.B. Collins, Inc. (SBC) to the VT DEC outlining those tasks that SBC will assume if a soil excavation project is approved for this site. Figure F presents the approximate area of proposed soil excavation at this site, and the dimensions associated with it. This area coincides with the zone of highest contamination in groundwater, as described in section 2.2. The proposed excavation area totals approximately 2100 cubic yards of in -place soil material, assuming an average vertical distance of soil removed to be seven feet across the rectangular excavation area depicted on Figure F. This depth will not be measured from the ground surface as the first two to four feet of soil will likely be relatively clean, and if so will be stripped and stockpiled for later use as backfill materials. The calculation of soil volume has considered various features (such as a portion of the existing USTs within the proposed excavation area) that could potentially decrease the overall volume of materials removed. However, the exact amount of materials that will need to be removed is uncertain, particularly in light of the lack of any analytical data on the soil materials at this site. This uncertainty is inherent in projects of this nature. During excavation activities, the soil will be screened with a PID as it is removed from �. the ground to determine whether it will be transported off -site for treatment, or stockpiled on -site for use as backfill material. The PID will be pre -calibrated to an isobutylene standard. The approximate volume of materials anticipated to be removed from the site (presented above and on Figure F) was quantified based on an assumption that all materials exhibiting a PID response greater than 500 parts per million (ppm) will be transported off -site for treatment. In a meeting held at the Sites Management Section (SMS) of the VT Waste Management Division on March 26, 2003, various aspects of this remedial approach were discussed. It was the opinion of SMS officials that a lower threshold limit of 100 ppm PID response should be the accepted standard to determine whether excavated soil is removed from the site. We question the need to lower this threshold limit. It is the intent of this remedial action is to remove enough contamination from the site to eliminate the necessity for active remediation, acid then rely on natural attenuation for further reduction. Given that the site receives contamination from an upgradient source coupled with the level of activity over the years throughout the property (installation and decommissioning of several generations of USTs, fuel dispensers and piping, the importation of fill, etc), it is probably unlikely that this proposed excavation effort will result in a site that is ready for closure. It should also be noted that lowering the threshold may have a significant impact on the total volume of materials removed from the site, and therefore the overall project cost, relative to the volume of materials estimated above. It is difficult, if not impossible, to predict the total volume of materials that will require off -site transport and treatment regardless of the PID threshold limit. STRATTON FRENCH, CGWP PAGE 7 CONSULTING HYDROLOGIST Once the soil is removed from the ground it is proposed to be transported off -site to a treatment and recycling facility in Fort Edward, NY. This facility, owned and operated by Environmental Soil Management, Inc. (ESMI), utilizes a thermal oxidizer to essentially burn off the volatile components of the contaminated soil. Following treatment, the soil materials become the property of ESMI, and all potential future liability to the site owner is removed. STRATTON FRENCH, CGWP PAGE 8 CONSULTING HYDROLOGIST 3.1 Conceptual Strategy The objectives of the proposed remedial strategy for the Shelburne Road Mobil North include removing gross petroleum contamination from the subsurface, and preventing the migration and accumulation of petroleum vapors in the site building. 3.2 Remedial Alternatives Based on the site characterization data and pilot testing results, several remedial alternatives have been identified to meet the remedial objectives; 1) installation of a conventional low vacuum SVE system; 2) installation of a HEAT or similar DPE and treatment system; 3) periodic site visits with a mobile HEAT or similar DPE system; 4) bulk excavation and off -site transport and treatment of contaminated soils. A cost estimate for the fourth alternative is provided as Table C, with the two-year monitoring costs for this option included as Table D. Table E summarizes the cost estimates of all four remedial alternatives. Detailed cost estimates of the first three alternatives are provided in Appendix C of CAP I, and are based on an operating time period of two years. Since the costs associated with the first three alternatives were developed almost 30 months ago in 2000, a 7.5% cost increase has been applied to these estimates to reflect 2003 conditions. This increase is reflected on Table E. General Discussion of Alternatives A discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of the first three remedial alternatives is presented in section 3.2 of CAPI. The advantages of the bulk soil excavation option are twofold. The combination of site renovation activities with corrective action efforts introduces an opportunity for completing the excavation project in a far more economical manner than if it was for pursued as a "stand alone" soil excavation project. This is due to opportunities equipment and resource sharing among the two efforts, as well as various components of the excavation effort to be completed under the renovation project. In addition, the site owner would likely be far less open to this radical disruption to site operations if they had not planned to disrupt activities themselves. An additional significant advantage of this option is the complete removal of the source of groundwater and vapor phase contamination at the site in a very rapid manner, with the corresponding reduction in potential for petroleum vapor accumulation in site buildings. While the other three options presented include two years of remedial activity monitoring, the two-year timetable for the soil excavation option includes groundwater sampling only during this timeframe, a feature common to all the other options. ,The one disadvantage of bulk soil excavation is the cost ($233,415). While not the highest of the four alternatives, it is the second highest, costing approximately 19% and STRATTON FRENCH CGwP PAGE 9 CONSULTING HYDROLOGIST 23% more than Mobile DPE and SVE, respectively. This cost, however, is lower than would be expected if the entire project was undertaken without the benefit of the concurrent renovation activities. 3.3 Recommendations Based on the current site data, either a conventional low -vacuum SVE system or periodic use of a mobile HEAT system (or other DPE system) could be suitable in meeting the site remedial objectives at similar costs. However, despite a somewhat higher cost, the bulk excavation of soil would more thoroughly address the gross contamination at this site, and do so in far less time, while limiting the potential for future vapor problems. Removing as much of the source of the groundwater and vapor contamination (residual contamination adsorbed to soil grains) will go the furthest towards reducing the potential for off -site migration of contaminated groundwater, and on -site migration and accumulation of soil vapors. This alternative could be implemented immediately; site renovation plans by the site owner call for a mid -April 2003 start date for demolition/construction activities. Based on the analysis of alternatives presented in this document as well as in CAP I, we recommend that corrective action be pursued at the Shelburne Road Mobil North site in ' South Burlington, and that this action consist of the bulk excavation and off -site transport and treatment of petroleum contaminated soil. The proposed area for soil excavation is outlined on Figure F. 3.4 Proposed Timeline Table F presents a list of contractors and other interested parties associated with the proposed corrective action alternative recommended above. A timeline for this corrective action effort is presented below. Week of March 31s` * Submit Corrective Action Plan (revised and updated) to SMS for 4' approval; * Begin public notification period; * Schedule soil sampling; * Schedule a site meeting with the site owner, contractors (excavation, soil T&D), consultant, and SMS. Week of April 71h * Obtain and submit soil samples for analysis (SW 846, RCRA 8 metals) from proposed excavation area; * Conduct site meeting with the site owner, contractors (excavation, soil T&D), consultant, and SMS; Week of April 141h * Begin process of soil excavation, and backfilling as needed; Week of April 2151 * Continue and complete process of soil excavation, and continue backfilling; Week of April 281h * Monitor soil conditions during foundation excavation; * Complete backfilling of excavation pit; * Schedule driller for monitoring well replacement; Week of May 5`h * Replace monitoring wells; Week of May 191h * Conduct 15` semi-annual 2003 groundwater sampling; Month of June * Submit summary report on soil excavation project and semi-annual t groundwater sampling; STRATTON FRENCH, CGWP PAGE 10 CONSULTING HYDROLOGIST TABLE A Groundwater Level Data Shelburne Road Mobil North, Sputh Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. A A Jun-13 A OQQ7 Jan-23 Jm23 Jun-20 A 14 NOV-18 Mt-28 A -26 A r-09 M -27 Oct-08 JurO7 Dec-13 M 23 Jun-08 Oel-05 Jan-25 Apr-1 Ju411 Oft-12 Mar-13 Jun-28 Nov-21 mM max 8ud.. Month/Day r r-27 -17 1995 1995 logo logo logo 1998 1096 1997 1997 logo 1998 1996 logo 1099 2000 2000 2000 2001 2001 2001 2001 2002 2002 2002 (11 Year 1905 1995 1905 6.97 6.36 6.94 5.94 5.80 6.50 8.11 6,01 528 0.15 6.67 8.52 0.63 5.10 6.30 6.77 6.98 5.86 0.02 5.10 6.77 1.a7 MW4 5.89 8.02 625 5.62 6.92 6.74 5.74 5.11 5.01 820 0.39 6.76 4.65 4A5 6.39 1.14 MW-2 5.57 5.42 6.71 6.49 6.08 5.97 0.16 5.97 8.15 6.04 6.76 5.58 6.51 5.76 6.41 5.58 5.02 5.71 8.51 4.72 4.51 5.82 0.95 5,91 6.89 5.81 0.00 5.97 7.04 4.77 5J14 5.15 8.38 7.04 7.24 6.20 6,49 7.45 8.30 4.51 7.45 2.94 MW-3 8.12 6.12 0.48 6.08 0.18 6.27 7.68 5.13 7.56 2.43 MW-4 6.22 629 6.86 6.24 0.01 5.04 0.81 6.28 5.70 6.71 6.13 8.53 OA2 6.14 5.62 OA2 4.91 5.96 0.98 5.94 5.20 5.66 4.91 0.96 2.05 MW-5 MW-8 5.85 1.19 boo 0.36 5,94 1.66 5.83 1.64 6.83 0.00 598 5.98 03 236 5.89 1.72 5.92 1.82 5.43 0.66 5.90 1.83 4.92 0.68 8.18 0.88 6.32 1.08 8.24 0.88 0.98 2.24 1.34 0.00 1.98 2.87 0.00 2.87 2.87 MW-g 1.03 0.20 2.00 1.38 0.50 2.89 2.00 127 1.93 1.74 223 0.10 0.81 0.43 1.78 0.71 1.15 123 2.00 2.07 1.76 0.10 2.69 2.59 0.10 027 8.47 6.63 6.33 5.08 0.74 7.09 5 79 024 7.47 6.42 5.63 6.17 5.33 7.47 2.14 MW-10 6.80 894 4.95 0.89 6Ji6 8.03 7D3 7A3 62 6.65 7.93 6.62 5,92 0.48 5.60 7.93 2.27 5.84 6,96 OA5 8.31 523 6.52 657 8.68 5.7 6.01 728 0.17 5.50 5.97 5.23 7.23 2.00 5.82 5.51 8.22 5.03 6.19 6.18 8.73 6.73 6.93 8.74 6.19 0.74 1.55 6.32 6.02 5.61 6.18 6.74 6.57 4.4 5.37 5.76 4.40 5.76 1.35 5,41 521 5.60 5.41 5.07 5.82 6.95 6.1 5.48 5.96 5.18 5.07 5A4 5.07 5.96 0.90 n1mw-le 5.63 6.52 5.79 6.83 5.15 597 4.88 6.67 5.15 4.68 8.15 L47 4.90 4.73 6.10 4.91 4.63 522 4.48 5.77 5.35 4.73 4.64 4.65 4.48 5.77 1.20 8,94 514 6.33 522 6.83 4.76 8.64 7.31 6.90 5.37 5.29 4.75 7.3f 2.60 6,31 7.16 0.71 523 7.64 7.41 5.76 727 8.15 6.67 5.64 5.89 5.23 8.15 2.92 1 5.60 0.69 1 6.82 4.71 691 6.67 4.8 7.49 7.77 5.OT 5.53 4.71 7.77 3.08 MW-20 1 1 2.74 1 3.04 327 2.5 2.7 3.11 2.93 2.49 1.80 1.60 3.27 1.47 MW.27 6.09 6.35 0.43 0.01 2.88 8,02 8.86 6.17 4.67 4.46 zoo 6.85 3.97 MW-22 9.58 8.71 8.02 9.87 82 9.57 998 8.62 6.34 8.38 820 0.98 3.70 MW-23 3.93 3.37 2.94 421 4.60 3.55 324 3.15 2.84 527 2.43 MW-24 3.39 3.80 2.47 3.67 3.75 3.11 3.00 2.04 2.04 5.8/ 3.77 MW-26 on 5.16 8.45 7.98 6.12 5.03 5.03 7.89 2.95 MW-26 EW-1 0.53 4.95 6.18 5.56 625 8.35 5.33 5.88 4.95 6.87 1.92 MW-27 5.52 8.74 1 7.12 5.8 62 7.39 0.03 5.52 7.30 1.07 EW-2 Jan-95 4.0 4.5 0 5.0 a 8 3q 5.5 m 6.0 3 6.5 O F 7.0 a w 0 7.5 8.0 Jan-96 Jan-97 Jan-96 Jan 99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist, 3/26/2003 TABLE B Groundwater sampling results for November 21, 2002, �I Shelburne Road Mobil North south Burlington, Vermont, SMS Site #94-1589. I RESULTS IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER WELL ID Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene 1,3,5-Tri- methyibenzene 1,2,4-Tri- methylbenzene Total Xylenes Naphthalene MTBE MW-1 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <4 120 MW-5 17 <2 <2 <4 <4 <6 <10 220 MW-10 4790 <100 2430 1420 2390 7800 553 768 MW-11 2300 61 740 170 760 2200 < 250 260 MW-12 2500 < 50 290 < 100 230 510 < 250 310 MW-15 10 1.4 13 5.9 100 19 5.2 <5 MW-17 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <3 <5 <5 MW-18 260 <10 <10 <20 <20 <30 <50 2100 MW-19 2.5 <1 <1 <2 <2 <3 <5 20 MW-20/duplicate 11/12 <11<1 <1/<1 <2/<2 <2/<2 <3/<3 <5/<5 110/120 MW-21 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <3 <5 20 MW-22 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <3 <5 <5 M W -23 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 50 < 50 < 75 < 125 2600 MW-24 <5 <5 <5 <10 <10 <15 <25 140 MW-25 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <3 <5 30 MW-27 1220 < 100 259 221 820 624 < 200 7210 EW-2 980 31 590 15 580 850 140 260 Field Blank <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <3 <5 <5 Trip Blank <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <3 <5 <5 VTGES 5.0 1000 700 4.0 5.0 10000 20 40 NOTES: < 1.0 = less than a detection limit of 1.0 micrograms per liter VT GES = Vermont Primary Groundwater Enforcement Standard (Groundwater Protection Rule & Strategy, 11/15/97) Samples collected by Hoffer Consulting, Inc. Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist, 312612003 Analyses performed by Green Mountain Laboratories, Inc. except MW-1, MW-10, MW-27 (VTDEC LaRosa Lab) TABLE C Cost Estimate for Excavation and Disposal of Petroleum Contaminated Soils, Shelburne Road Mobil North, South Burlington, Vermont, SMS Site #94-1589 LABOR Task/item Staff Hours Rate Amount Project Mgmt. / Field Preparation / Scheduling SCF 16 $55 $880.00 Soil Sampling SCF 8 $55 $440.00 Site Meeting with Contractors / Client / SMS SCF 6 $55 $330.00 Supervision of Excavation / Backfilling (11 days @ 12 hrs/day) SCF / Tech. 132 $50 $6,600.00 Monitor Foundation Excavation (2 days) SCF / Tech. 24 $50 $1,200.00 Replace Monitoring Wells: Locate / Install / Survey SCF 14 $55 $770.00 1 st Semi-annual 2003 Groundwater Sampling Tech. 12 $40 $480.00 1st Semi-annual 2003 Groundwater Sampling SCF 12 $55 $660.00 Reporting (w/maps) for Soil Excavation and GW Sampling SCF 20 $55 $1,100.00 Labor $12,460.00 EXPENSES Item Quantity Rate Amount Mileage (20 trips) 2000 $0.35 $700.00 PID Rental (soil sampling, mon. well install., and excavation) 15 $25 $375.00 Survey Equipment Rental (new monitoring wells) 1 . $45 $45.00 Miscellaneous Expenses 1 $300 $300.00 Expenses $1,420.00 SUB -CONTRACTORS Contactor / Item Quantity Rate Amount KENNEDY DRILLING Mobilization & Soil Sampling (7 samples) 1 $750.00 $750.00 Mobilization & Monitoring Well Replacement (est. 4 wells) 1 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 PHOENIX LABORATORIES, INC. Soil Analyses - TPH (SW 846), RCRA 8 metals 7 $170.00 $1,190.00 MUNSON EXCAVATION Soil Excavation and Loading ( 7.5 days @ 10 hours/day) 75 $210.00 $15,750.00 Excavation Pit Backfilling ( 3 days @ 10 hours/day) 30 $210.00 $6,300.00 Backfill Soil (cubic yards) 800 $12.00 $9,600.00 ESMI OF NEW YORK Soil Transportation & Disposal, costs per ton ($49/ton, inclusive) 3,150 $49.00 $154,350.00 10 % Contingency for wet soil, non -conforming loads, standby, etc. 0.10 $154,350.00 $15,435.00 GREEN MOUNTAIN LABORATORIES, INC. Groundwater Sampling Analysis - 8260M 24 $45.00 $1,080.00 Sub -Contractor Expense* $206,055.00 * no mark up if billed direct to S.B. Collins, Inc. ESTIMATED TOTAL111219,935.00 Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist, 3/28/2003 0 I I 0 11 1 TABLE D Cost Estimate for Annual Groundwater Sampling Shelburne Road Mobil North, South Burlington, Vermont, SMS Site #94-1589 LABOR Task/Item Staff Hours Rate Amount Project Mgmt. / Field Preparation / Scheduling SCF 2 $55 $110.00 Semi-annual Groundwater Sampling AEF 12 12 16 $40 $480.00 Semi-annual Groundwater Sampling SCF $55 $660.00 Reporting SCF $55 $880.00 Labor $2,130.00 EXPENSES Item Quantity Rate Amount Mileage 200 $0.35 $70.00 $40.00 Product Interface Rental 1 $40 Miscellaneous Expenses 1 $50 $50.00 Expenses $160.00 SUB -CONTRACTORS Contractor / Item Quantity Rate Amount GREEN MOUNTAIN LABORATORIES INC. Groundwater Sampling Analysis - 8260M 24 $45.00 $1,080.00 Sub -Contractor Expense 1 $1,080.00 Stratton French CGWP Consulting Hydrologist, 3/26/2003 ESTIMATED TOTAL PER EVENTI $3,370.00 ESTIMATED ANNUAL TOTAL (Semi -Annual Sampling)JI $6,740.00 TABLE E Summary of Preliminary Cost Estimates for Remedial Alternatives Shelburne Road North Mobil, South Burlington, Vermont, SMS Site #94-1589 SVE Installed DPE Mobile DPE Bulk Soil Excavation LABOR $24,740 $31,820 $4,710 $12,460 INTERNAL EXPENSES $4,145 $3,820 $507 $1,420 EXTERNAL EXPENSES $35,970 $70,400 $0 $0 SUB -CONTRACTORS $25,850 $43,274 $8,470 $206,055 INSTALLATION COST- 2000 $90,705 $149,314 $13,687 na INSTALLATION COST - 2003 $97,508 $160,513 $14,714 $219,935 LABOR $21,960 $22,180 $17,360 $4,260 INTERNAL EXPENSES $5,148 $5,148 $2,924 $320 EXTERNAL EXPENSES $10,450 $19,360 $0 $0 SUB -CONTRACTORS $5,434 $4,950 $64,020 $2,160 ANNUAL O&M - 2000 $42, 992 $51, 638 $84, 304 na ANNUAL O&M - 2003 $46,216 $55,511 $90,627 $6,740 InstallatJon & 2 Yr. O&M - 2003 $189,941 1 $271,534 $195,967 $233,415 Note: 2003 Installation and Annual 08M costs for SVE, Installed DPE, and Mobile DPE assume a 7.5% increase over 2000 costs. These costs were originally presented as Table 6 in CAP1, submitted in November of 2000 by Hoffer Consulting Inc. Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist, 3/28/2003 TABLE F List of Contractors and Interested Parties, Bulk Soil Excavation Remedial Alternative, Shelburne Road Mobil North, South Burlington, Vermont, SMS Site #94-1589 Responsible Party: S. B. Collins, Inc. 54 Lower Welden St. St Albans, VT 05478 (802) 527-0116 Landowner: Jolley & Associates 54 Lower Welden St. St Albans, VT 05478 (802) 527-0116 Environmental Consultant: Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 1831 Lightening Ridge Road Plainfield, VT 05667 (802) 454-4636 Excavation Contractor: Munson Earth Moving Corp. 20 Shunpike Road Williston VT 05495 ' (802) 863-6391 Soil Transport & Disposal: ESMI of New Hampshire 67 International Drive Loudon, NH 03307 (603) 783-0228 Backfill Soil Contractor: Munson Excavation 20 Shunpike Road Williston VT 05495 (802) 863-6391 Stratton French, CGAP Consulting Hydrologist, 3/31/2003 Contact Person Carl Ruprecht Contact Person Carl Ruprecht Contact Person Stratton French Contact Person Bill Bohlen Contact Person Mike Phelps Contact Person Bill Bohlen MW-8 & M W-9 rpm_ EXPLANATION MW-103 iZ GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL AD-3 O SOIL VAPOR MONITORING POINT N a•+4• i MW-7 (destroyed) Entrance & Parkingg Lot for K-Mart r� MW-6 PROPERTY (destroyed) OFJUSTER DEVELOPMENT BMW-25 — — — — M W-4 I EW-1 AD-1 O (MW-26) I — — —property line— — — B MW-23 m OAD-2 E m m a O existin USTs (to b M W-20 m M W- remove U m y Q Proposed a Store MW-319 MW-5 former USTS :MW-2:.removed': in 1993 •: Sh -27 BMW-10 O AD-3EXIsting Store *_2 BBB (to be removed e MW-it d)} MW-12 pavement Shelburne Road MW-1 I 9 &MW-16 grass I M -15 I B MW-17 I I MW-18& M W-22 grass LI MW-14 pavement MW-13 I property line — — — — — — — — — — — — — PROPERTY — OF SOUTHLAND ENTERPRISES Burger SCALE 1 inch = 50 feet King FIGURE A 0 1/2 1 inches & SITE BASEMAP WITH PROPOSED RENOVATIONS MW-21 SHELBURNE ROAD MOBIL NORTH 0 25 50 feet SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, SMS SITE #94-1589 Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 10 � snonovou pa,mo Lot for x'Mart �(uow*',°^) \ EXPLANATION ww'1 MONITORING WELL & e»/, WATER -TABLE ELEVATION (rssr) � WATER -TABLE CONTOUR <rssr> ~----- GROUNDWATER FLow DIRECTION (destroyed)* � ` pavement—W'___—_____'____________. �w---------'--� Sww'uo -3.00 \ 90.31 ` ` '�r�imer. | '�^ . | ~�0hm�w°+2 � | � 0 Road canopy 93.74 17 IS 93.24 92.28 Burger King SCALE 1 inch 50 feet FIGURE B 0 1/2 1 inches 92.28 SHELBURNE ROAD MOBIL NORTH Shelburne S MW-8 B — — _property line— — — Entrance & Parking Lot for K-Mart 9 MW-7 tMS. (destroyed) MW-6 (destroyed) Fi ' 11 ----- — — ——MW-24 1zMW 25 30 140 B 2 0 5 I B ormer usts removed O min 1993 I � IN, &MW-10 768 -"�M W-20 O 110 XiSting E260 �� MW-12 (:iE:: 310 MW-19US(S 20 -MW-0 o z 260 EXPLANATION MW-5 MONITORING WELL & 411 MTBE CONCENTRATION (UG/L) MTBE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR (UG/L) f _ _ GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION pavement Shelburne Road I M1 �12W-0 I B graSS MW-15 < 5 �M5-17 I I M2 0' � 2100 u MW-22 < 5 Burger King SCALE 1 inch = 50 feet FIGURE C 0 1/2 1 inches M20'MTBE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR MAP, NOVEMBER 21, 2002 �%E� SHELBURNE ROAD MOBIL NORTH 0 25 50 feet SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, SMS SITE #94-1589 Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist i N MW-8 MW-9 — — _property line— — — B MW-23 < 25 MW-22 < 1 SCALE 1 inch = 50 feet 0 1/2 1 inches 0 25 50 feet MW-7 y (destroyed) Entrance & Parking Lot for K-Mart EXPLANATION MW-5 MONITORING WELL $ 411 BENZENE CONCENTRATION (UG/L) BENZENE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR (UG/L) r _ _ GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION MW-6 (destroyed) S pavement M W - 2 4 - — — ' - — — — — — — — — — SMW-25 < 5S B M W-5 17 Y7p'y, • . former usts removed O in 1993 `. \ O \ &MW-27 • &MW-10 790 MW-20 O 11 MW-12 9 BB 2500 nopy MW-19 2.5 •� O2 0011 Shelburne Road MW-1 <2 grass MW-15 10 �M W-17 M W 6 0 � 20 u Burger King FIGURE D MW-121 BENZENE ISOCONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER NOVEMBER 21, 2002, SHELBURNE ROAD MOBIL NORTH SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, SMS SITE #94-1589 Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist B MW-8 Entrance & Parking Lot for K-Mart 'J i MW-7 5 (destroyed) EXPLANATION MW-1 MONITORING WELL NUMBER & 136 TOTAL 8260M COMPOUNDS (UG/L) (INCLUDES DETECTION LIMIT WHERE BELOW) ISOCONCENTRATION —Y% CONTOUR (UG/L) _ GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION I� S MW-6 BMW-9 (destroyed) pavement SMW-25 qy 9MW-4 Free MW-3 B MW-5 1 1 1 1 45 t Prod '` to EW-1/MW-26 26,550 on 6128/02 -2• •rem Oved ' : in 1 Shelburne m MW-27 Road 10,654 N — — —property line— — — I r r 'm M I a B MW-10 136 ••- :: — — 201251- — B &MW-16 o 2 1 Existing St e Existing; ;':3446 ro e e 4 M W20 m 9 M 36 USTs (to be &S be remov d removed): 6t 41 grass MW-23 146 I 2975 ro y M W-12 canopy MW-15 0 4240 160 CL Proposed �MWzo 7 D- Store I MW-18& 2500 MW-22 MW-14 20 grass meet I property line- — — — — — — — — — — — SCALE 1 inch = 50 feet FIGURE E TOTAL 8260M COMPOUND ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR MAP, 0 1/2 1 inches M -21 NOVEMBER 21, 2002 0 25 50 feet SHELBURNE ROAD MOBIL NORTH SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, SMS SITE #94-1589 Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 01-1 Dimensions of Excavation Area * 145' x 60' = 8700 square feet * 8700 - 600 (existing tank bed) = 8100 sq. ft * Assume 6-8 feet average excavation depth 8100 x 7 = 56,700127 = 2100 cubic yards * 210,0 cubic yards = 3150 tons PCS to either Stockpile or Incinerate * T&D to NY@ $49/ton = $154,500 KM� i• MW-7 S' (destroyed) S, MW-6 (destroyed) EXPLANATION MW-1 MONITORING WELL NUMBER & 136 B TOTAL 8260M COMPOUNDS (UG/L) (INCLUDES DETECTION LIMIT WHERE BELOW) �. —'�•+ ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR (UG/L) APPROXIMATE AREA PROPOSED SOIL EXCAVATION pavement t9MW-25 _2 — — — — — — — — 45 MW-3 B MW-5 45 _4 1 1 11 re P lu fo ; 1 / _ • •'• • USTs 1 1 1 2 ,5 o s/ /0 -2: removed. in 1993 ; ; Shelburne m Road E 0, m I — — —property line— M B W 10 13s -� 20,251 — 9 &MW-16 2 'i:-3446 ' is n t e Existing:.,; 9 USTS (to be e m grass x MW-19 removed); --*-.: 11 1 1 1 MW-20 m 36 6 4_ _ MW-23 146 2975 MW-12 canopy MW-15 0 4240 160 B MW-17 o Proposed 20 IL Store 1 1 I 1 1 1 MW-18� B 2500 M W-22 MW-14 20 grass meat � I property line- - - - - - - - - - - - SCALE 1 inch = 50 feet FIGURE F TOTAL 8260M COMPOUND ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR MAP (11/21/02) 0 �/2 1 inches AND APPROXIMATE AREA OF PROPOSED SOIL EXCAVATION 0 25 50 feet SHELBURNE ROAD MOBIL NORTH SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, SMS SITE #94-1589 Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist MW4 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So, Burlington, VT, SMS Site 494-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE Water Level * (ft BGS) 1,3,5-Tri- meth (benzene 1,2,4-Tri- meth (benzene Naphthalene 11/2211993 1 1 1 1 560 6.04 122/1993 1 1 1 1 __ 470 6.00 - _ 7119l1994 --- 1 - 1 1 1 568 6.02 _ 12/5/1 994 1 1 1 1 382 6.38 4/6/1995 1 1 1 1 1 361 5.89 6/13/1995 1 1 1 1 360 6.25 8/17/1995 1 1 1 1 254 5.62 10l27/1995 1 1 1 1 290 6.92 123/1996 I 1 1 1 1 193 5.74 6/26/1996 1 1 1 1 279 5.97 11/14l1996 1 1 1 1 353 6.36 11/18/1996 1 1 1 1 218 5.94 3/28/1997 1 1 1 1 1 194 5.84 825/1997 1 1 1 1 136 5.80 4/9/1998 1 1 1 1 144 5.56 10/6/1998 2.6 1 1 5.7 130 6.01 1 1 1 6(7/1999 1 1 1 1 170 6.28 1 1 1 12/13/1999 1 1 1 1 160 6.15 1 1 1 10/52000 1 1 1 1 129 6.52 1 1 1 125/2001 1 1 1 1 158 e.63 1 1 1 4/102001 1 1 1 1 63 5.10 1 1 1 7/112001 1 1 1 1 117 6.36 1 1 1 12/122001 1 1 1 1 3 100 6.77 2 2 5 3/132002 1 1 1 3 110 5.98 2 2 5 WM002 1 1 1 3 100 5.86 2 2 5 11212002 2 2 2 2 120 6.02 2 2 4 1 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration LPUU • 5.2 5.4 A 5.6 • 5A . e- too 6.6 6.2 • A d, 6.4 6.6 e 6.6 10 7.12 JeneD J-84 J-95 Ja 96 J-97 J-96 J-99 Jerv00 is"I J.102 J-03 Jerf04 Date (rnant"ar) --- 0--MfBE • - A • - Water Level • (R BGSj Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3/262003 MW-1 MW-2 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site 494-1589. (results in ug(L) sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE Water Level • ft BGS 1,3,5-Tri- meth (benzene 1,2,4-Tri- meth (benzene Naphthalene 11/22/1993 2,500 3,600 2,400 8,700 19,000 5.86 7/19/1994 830 1,250 530 3,500 33,500 5.25 12/5/1994 3 7 5 41 57 6.30 4/6/1995 2,080 1,950 1,650 7,210 132,000 5.57 6/l3/1 995 2,070 1,470 361 3,920 88,000 5.71 §_/_17/1995 885 482 194 1,710 32,500 5.49 10/27/1995 436 18 29 259 19,000 5.68 1123/1996 1,260 252 175 1,690 19.500 5.97 6/26/1996 1,710 142 448 1,170 15,100 5.04 8/14/1996 2,210 167 206 1,990 14,300 5.58 11118/1996 1,220 75 124 1,390 10,100 5.76 3/28/1997 2,210 429 259 3,140 4,330 5.56 8/25/1997 1 145 24 43 506 128 5.71 4/911998 86 39 52 838 30 4.72 10/6/1998 1,600 90 68 680 650 5.91 25 92 22 61711999 1,200 20 40 270 730 5.81 24 38 10 12/13/1999 3,100 100 160 1,000 1,400 5.97 100 1 130 140 5/23/2000 12.8 1 2.5 28.3 10 4.77 3.3 8.0 5.8 10/5/2000 60 4 9.2 62.5 20 6.11 10.2 11.3 24.9 4/10/2001 2,420 In 309 2,600 755 5.01 134 297 141 7/11/2001 3,100 166 350 3.110 805 5.71 112 342 115 12/12/2001 1.600 50 450 4,000 750 6.39 230 870 270 3/13/2002 3 1 1.3 20 5 5.75 3.4 8.4 5 6/28/2002 2.5 1 1 4.1 5 4.65 2 2 5 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration Note : Data for 6/7/99 is for the duplicate sample, as the reported sample results were all non -detects below 100 ug/L. 4.0 ;e 1,000,000 1• 100,000 4.5 Q Q C 10,000 ° ° 5.0 c o e f 5.5 1000 ° d A. °A 'A' e° 0 100 p• ° � m 6.0 10 6.5 y • 7.0 1 Aug¢93 Aug-94 Aug95 Aug96 Aug-97 Aug96 Aug-99 Aug -GO Aug-01 Aug-02 Aug03 Date (monthtyear) -+-6e-ne - IS--ToWene Ethylbenzene -K-Xylenes -?K MTBE - - °- • Water Lever (R BGS) Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-2 MW-3 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE Water LBevvel meth3l5-Tri- a meth2l -Tri- a Naphthalene Sample Date Benzene 1 1 1 5,600 6.47 11/22/1993 1 12I5/1994 4/6/1995 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7,470 3 ,120 6.91 6.12 6/13/1985 1 1 1 100 5 1() 10 10 5 1 2 100 5 5 10 10 10 5 1 1 100 5 10 10 10 5 8,550 6,780 8,530 21,600 57,600 6,000 0 46,000 29,900 6.48 6.06 6.18 6.15 .75 6 51 .51 8.41 5.82 8/17/1995 1 10/27/1995 100 5 66 1/23/1996 6/26/1996 8/14/1996 34 11/18/1996 10 3/28/1997 5 8/25/1997 6 5 10 200 20 20 50 50 10 2 10 25 1 5 10 200 20 20 5D 50 10 2 10 25 1 5 10 200 20 20 50 50 10 2 10 125 3 31,200 15,200 14,000 7,500 7,500 3,240 3,220 1,480 193 1,780 2,100 940 6.51 4.51 6.89 6.90 7.04 5.84 7.04 6.45 5.20 8.49 7.45 6.30 200 20 20 50 50 10 2.0 10.0 2 2 200 20 20 50 50 19.3 2.0 10.0 50 3 200 20 20 50 50 32.6 2.0 10.0 125 5 4/9/1998 73 10/6/199,8 600 260 32 6/711999 12/13/1999 5/23/2000 51.2 69.5 10/5/2000 2/12/2001 38.2 2.0 18.4 25 4/10/2001 7/11/2001 12/12/2001 3/13/2002 1 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration 100,000 � J I ' a 1,000 e 8 9 Q e '°° 10 1 _T De 92 De 93 Dec-94 D-95 De.9e 0-97 De0-96 1)ee-99 Deo00 Deo-01 Date (nwrNhlyear) -)K MTBE -O--Benzene - .6- Water Level '(R BGS) 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 ; s 6.50 0 zoo 7.50 8.00 De 02 Stratton French, CGWP MW-3 Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-4 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug(L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE Water Level ft BGS 1,3,5-Trl- meth (benzene 1,2,4-Trl- meth (benzene Naphthalene 11/22/1993 1 1 1 1 4,000 6.64 7/19119 44 11 1 2.0 1 < 500 6.31 1215/1994 1 1 1 1 3,020 7.18 416/1995 1 1 1 1 2,500 6.22 6/1311995 1 1 1 1 2,030 6.86 8/17/1 995 1 1 1 1 1,480 6.24 10/27/1995 50 50 50 50 1,940 6.01 6/2611 996 5 5 5 5 1,180 5.64 11/18/1996 1 1 1 1 868 6.28 3/2811997 1 1 1 1 859 5.76 8/25/1997 1 1 1 1 829 6.71 4/9/1998 10/611998 617/1999 12113/1999 2.0 1,400 1,930 540 1 8.7 23,100 26,000 1 6.0 3,420 21,000 1 13 19,070 100,000 214 18,000 680 900 5.13 6.27 7.56 1.1 910 49,000 1.9 3,250 100,300 1 760 27,000 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration 1,000,0D0 5.00 e • 100,000 ; '. 5.50 4 10,000 • , , e.00 na s z • &50 o 100 e , ' zi a 4g e 10 D �. 7.50 e 8.00 0 Dec-92 Dec-93 Dec-94 0-95 D-99 Dec-97 Dec-98 Dec-99 Dec-00 Date (monthyear) +Benzene --- 1111—Toluene Ethylbe-ene---X--Xylenes —A —MTBE •A - Water Level' (R BGS) Stratton French, CGWP MW 4 Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-5 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site 994-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE Water Level • R BOS 1,3,5-Tri- meth lbenzene 1,2,4-Trl- meth (benzene Naphthalene 11/22/1993 3 2 4 5 4,200 6.02 12/5/1994 175 5 8 13 20,300 6.40 4l6/1995 145 6 6 11 6,700 5.65 6/13/1995 198 9 9 4 19,100 5.95 8/17/1995 153 5 5 5 11.900 5.63 1012711995 226 5 5 5 18,500 5.83 1/23/1996 107 5 5 1 5 15,200 5.98 6/26/1996 64 10 10 10 5,020 5.23 8/14/1996 86 10 1-6-10 10,700 5.89 11/18/1996 131 10 10 1 10 8,680 5.92 3/28/199797 36 1 2 3 1,020 5.43 81 5119 259 2 5 2 3,510 5.96 4/9/1998 15 1 1 1 213 4.92 10/6/1998 160 4.3 1.8 4.8 2,200 6.32 1 1 1 61711999 370 10 17 23 2,900 6.24 10 10 10 12/13/1999 89 100 100 100 2,500 6.42 00 100 100 10/5/2000 81.5 10 10 10 411 6.42 10 10 10 4/10/2001 21.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 94 4.91 1.0 1.0 1.0 7/11/2001 24.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 80 5.95 1.0 1.0 1.0 12/12/2001 240 20 35 60 1,200 6.96 40 40 100 3/13/2002 45 2 2 6 190 5.94 4 4 10 6/28/2002 9.2 2 2 6 220 5.20 4 4 10 11 /21 /2002 17 1 1 2 220 5.65 2 2 5 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below j1 4.5 100,000 50 10,000 .� `b 5.5 � ♦ e e 1,000 ' � c -A. : ,00 8.5 y 10 n e 7.0 h n 7.5 1 J-93 Jeo-94 Je 95 J-96 J-97 J-90 J-99 J-00 Jan-01 J-02 J-03 J-04 Date (month/yew) 4 Benzene --Tobens Ethyl wwn-1E-Xykna5 -.-MTBE - - Water Level' M Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-5 MW-6 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE Water Level' ft BGS 4/6/1995 1 12 1 1 693 2.13 6/13/1995 1 21 1 1 695 2.02 8/17/1995 1 2 1 1 657 2.36 10/27/1995 1 1 1 1 756 2.34 1/23/1996 1 3 1 1 282 2.72 6/26/1996 1 1 1 1 230 2.34 8/14/1996 1 1 - - 1 1 181 2.72 11/18/1996 5 5 5 5 619 2.33 3/28/ 1997 1 1 1 1 144 1.68 8/25/1997 1 1 1 1 15 3.06 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 10000 1000 Z O F 100 Z W U Z O U 10 1I— Dec-94 Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-6 MW-7 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date ;Benze] 4/6/1995 1 6/13/1995 1 8/17/1995 1 10/27/1995 1 6/26/1996 1 8/14/1996 11/18/1996 1 1 Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE Water Level ft BGS 14 1 1 1 1.13 90 1 1 1 0.50 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.22 0.20 3 1 1 1 0.25 1 1 1 1 1.62 1 1 1 1 1.43 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 0.0 FV1. 10,000 - ` 0.2 0.4 1,000 ................................._..._..__....._._.._.._._..._....---..._..._.._._._.._...__....._..__.._..._....._............ 6 0. m z0 s 0.8 $ Toluene a 100 ; 1 0 m F z w z ; V 10 __� ._.......... ................... 1.4 1.8 1 c o < 7 tOp1 (dpl V Ln Date Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-7 MW-8 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE Water Level ft BGS 4/6/1995 1 32 1 1 1 1.19 6/13/1995 8/17/1995 10/27/1995 1 /23/1996 1 1 1 1 6 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.65 1.54 0.60 6.42 6/26/T996 1 1 1 1 1 2.36 14/1996 11Y18/1996 12/13/1999 1 1 5 1 1 10 1 1 10 1 1 10 1 1 10 1.72 1.82 0.98 7/11 /2001 1.2 5.6 1 3.4 1 1.98 12/12/2001 1 1 1 3 1 2.87 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-8 MW-9 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE Waft BGS) Levelter ^ meth 3]benzene methylbenzene Naphthalene _ 1 f __ t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1,130 11110 844 823 t.03 2.06 1.38 0•50 -- - 4/611995 6113/1995 1 1 1 38 5 1 8/17/1995 10/27/1995 1/23/1996 6/26/1996 8/ 14/ 1996 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 927 733 597=2.23-E 11118/1996 1 1 f t 1 1,130 312811997 i 1 t 143 8/2511997 1 1 t 1 1 f 10 20 1 1 1 1 10 20 607 1,100 1,100 620 1,300 1,580 220 10 0.83 0.83 1.71 0.71 1.15 23 1.67 1 1 10 1 1 10 2D 2 1 1 10 20 2 4/9/1998 1 1 10l6/1998 13 1 61711999 6.3 1 12/13/1999 14.0 10 5/23/2000 10/5/2000 20.0 20 10 1 30 3 880 �0 2.87 1.75 20 2 20 2 50 5 12/12/2o01 10 10 3/13/2002 1 1 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration defection limits used in graph below 10,000 1,000 100 10 1 J-94 J-95 J-96 J-97 per,-yn +d-=� --• -- Data (monthlyear) --e--Bmierro —s —MTBE . _ p.. Water Level `(E BGS) �.00 ).50 1.00 f 0gg 1.50 I[ 8 to to 2.00 2.60 3.00 e3 Stratton French, CGWP MW-9 Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-10 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lanes MTBE Water Level • 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 5/27/1998 3,550 94 1,540 5,550 2,040 6.10 10/6/1998 5,400 200 2,700 11,000 1,300 6.27 1,000 3,300 560 6/7/1999 4,800 100 1,600 5,700 3.000 6.47 850 2,100 450 12/13/1999 3,300 100 1,600 6,000 3,100 6.53 630 1,900 310 5/23/2000 2,020 99 1,460 5,370 2,740 5.33 625 2,030 583 10/512000 31950 65 1.830 5,940 2,530 6.74 502 1,590 493 1/25/2001 5,130 85.5 2,230 8,230 2,200 7.09 635 2,180 495 4/10/2001 1,730 100.0 1.270 4,620 1,780 5.79 660 1,920 337 7/11/2001 4,300 103.0 1570 5,430 2,100 6.24 675 1,460 310 12/12/2001 3900 100 1700 6,700 1,500 7.47 790 2,900 580 3/13/2002 2,700 34 1.000 3,500 3,500 6.42 470 1,800 330 6/28/2002 2,500 37 1.900 5,800 190 5.53 810 2 300 480 11/21/2002 4,790 100 2,4W 7,800 768 6.17 1,420 2,390 553 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 100,000 4.0 -- ----- 4.5 �,. 10,000 - 5.0 P 55 a � 1,000 6.0 A - -p-__-__- - - CD 6.5 y 100 7.0 A 7.5 10- U JUM Jen-a Ju]-99 Jan-00 JUF00 Jarr01 JU-01 Jar,02 JuF02 Dec-02 Jur Jel►99 03 Date (monthtyear) - 6 Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene -X Xylems MTBE - - G- - Water Level " Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-10 MW-11 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene Xyienes MTBE Water Level' ftBGS 133-TMB 124-TMB Naphthalene 5/27/1998 4140 209 1,510 5730 5,800 2020 1,000 6.60 6.64 380 1 300 280 10/6/1998 6/7/1999 4.800 4,000 300 170 1,600 1,200 4,300 1,200 6.95 440 1,200 270 12/13/1999 5,500 230 1,700 5 500 1,400 6.89 390 1,300 270 10/5/2000 3,960 138 1220 3070 916 7.03 218 798 249 1/25/2001 1 1,390 49.1 1 229 1 600 483 7.43 166 680 112 4/10/2001 3,080 73.2 699 1430 1180 6.20 160 795 180 7/11/2001 4,540 133 1250 3200 1120 6.65 490 1340 436 12/12/2001 4,600 140 1,300 3,400 1 200 7.93 190 1,100 280 3/13/2002 3,900 260 1100 3100 1300 6.82 200 960 260 6/28/2002 5,000 140 1,300 3,000 1,900 5.92 100 980 310 11/21/2002 2,300 61 740 2200 260 6.48 170 760 250 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration 1_.--- ,.--.a.........1 ....-.enl, —i— Stratton French, CGWP MW 11 Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 NM-12 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site P94-1589. (results in ugIL) Sample Data Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes IVITBE Water Level * (ft BGS) 1,3,5-TMB — 740 1,2,4-TMB 1,400 Naphthalene 350 5/2711998 7,270 --- j,-700 7,040 2-30 310 0 1,020 1,700 3,720 2,200 5.84 6.45 / 99 6/7/1999 12/1311999 — 100 660 2.400 11,000 6.31 720 1,700 340 — /2 3,420 ill 1450 1,020 — 2,030 2,390 6.57 633 1,760 1,150 �FJ 112512001 3,600 53.1 514 1,000 2,260 6.88 184 478 178 4/10/2001 2.290 50.0 443 854 2.810 5.70 353 742 279 7111/2001 2,880 44.1 325 717 2,120.. 6.01 222 407 124 3/13/2002 2,700 50 420 900 890 6.17 0 360 1,400 =5901,500 540 6/28/2002 1,700 50 5 1,100 250 5.50 )0 400 11/21/2002 2,500 50 290 510 310 5.97 100 100 0 230 250 I = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 4.0 100,000 10,000 V1. 1.000 - -------- -------- --7.0 100- 8.0 10 Ja�04 J-98 J�99 Jan-00 Jar�01 Ja�02 Ja�03 Date (monthf"ar) Ethylbenzene --- *—fvTrBE Water Level* (ft BGS) Stratton French, CGWP MW-12 Consulting Hydrologist 312612003 NM-14 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site 994-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lenes MTBE Water Level' ftBGS 1,3,6-TMB 1,2,4-TM8 Naphthalene 5/27/1998 1 1 1 1 2 5.32 10/6/1998 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 5.02 1 1 1 6/7/1999 0.5 1 1 1 1 5.51 1 1 1 12/13/1999 0.5 1 1 1 1 5.16 1 1 1 10/5/2000 1.0 1 1 1 10 5.57 1 1 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 40 10.0 42 44 4.6 0 v 4.8 0 0 - 1.0 5.0 a .® 5.2 m U d 54 9 5.8 _ &0 0.1 Deo-97 Deo-98 Dec99 Deo-00 Data (month/year) --t—Benzene TToluene Ethybenzene —it—Xylenee ---it—MTBE b - Water Level' (R BGS) Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-14 MW-15 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sam le Date Benzene Toluene 64 35 13 Eth (benzene 207 120 96 160 90 16 4.3 23.7 22.2 1 50 11 13 X lanes 969 600 370 700 337 31.4 7.5 72.0 37.3 3 130 11 19 MTBE 26 27.0 10 10 50 20 10 5.7 18.3 12 5 5 5 Water Level ft BGS 5.41 5.21 5.60 5.41 5.07 5.82 5.95 5.10 5.48 5.95 5.18 5.07 5.14 1,3,5-TMB 97 72 120 n26. 2.6 5.9 1,2 4-T1N6 460 340 540 284 99.1 46.7 131.0 12.5 2W 42 100 Na hthalene 59 45 82 49.8 128 5.8 14.1 158 26 5 5.2 5127/1998 10/6/1998 6r7/1999 78 40 18 12/13/1999 5C23/2000 20 25.4 28 5 10/5/2000 3.9 3.3 1/25/2001 1.0 1.3 4/10/2001 7/112001 10.3 17.3 4.0 5.0 12/12/2001 1 3/132002 11 2.4 6R8/2002 1121 /2002 16 10 1.2 1.4 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 1,000.0 1.0 Jat 98 Jul-98 Jao-99 Jul- 99 J-00 Jl4uu ja- .+��� -�•• -- -- -- Date (month/year) -----Beniane .--Toluetta Ethylbenzene u�.e.e MTBE - b - Water Level (It FIGS) 5.3 e v 5.4 0 5.5 5.6 $ m N 5.7 5.8 5.9 ea 03 Stratton French, CGWP MW-15 Consulting Hydrologist 3262003 MW-16 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X Ienes MTBE Water Level • ft BOS 1,3,6-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 5/27/1998 1 1 1 t 122 5.63 10/6/1998 0.5 1 1 1 170 5.52 1 1 1 6/7/1999 0.5 1 1 1 120 5.79 1 1 1 12/13/1999 0.5 1 1 1 100 5.63 1 1 1 5/23/2000 1.0 1 1 1 57 5.15 1 1 1 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 1.000.0 5.0 5.1 A 5.2 100.0 6.3 $s 5.4 $ �;,.. 10.0 d 5.5 x 5.6 5.7 1.0 n 5.8 5.9 0.1 6.0 Jan-96 Jul-98 Jarr9B JUI-99 JanrW JUF00 Date (nw*Vyem) 6 Barone tTduene Ethybenadu —m—Xylenes—st—MTBE ... A... Water Level' (2 BGS) Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-16 NM-17 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lenee MTBE Water Level 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 5/27/1998 2 1 10 23 2 4.90 10/6/1998 2.1 1 2.3 3.2 3.1 4.73 1 7.9 2.0 6/7/1999 1.3 1 3.0 1 2.2 5.16 1 1.8 2.2 12/ 13/1999 1.0 1 1 1 1 4.91 1 1 1 12/12/2001 1 1 1 3 5 5.35 2 2 5 3/13/2002 1 1 1 3 5 4.73 2 2 5 6/28/2002 3.9 1 1 3 5 4.54 2 2 5 11/21/2002 1 1 1 3 5 4.65 2 2 5 feet below ground surface 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 100.0 - ___ __.. _-__ __ _. _._. __.. _.. -- 4.0 4.2 4.4 A' , e ® Q , a.e 4.8 r ,A 10.0 . , 5.0 m •e. i 5.2 m N 5.4 H -1C 56 5.8 1.0 i. i `-__.__ . 6.0 Mar-98 Mar-99 Mar-00 Mar-01 Mar-02 Mar-03 Date (mont"ear) -0 Benzene Ethylbenzene -X Xylenes -ME-MTBE -dam Water Level Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-17 MW-18 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lanes MTBE Water Level ` 1 3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 10/6/1998 150 2.6 1.2 6.5 1,200 6.94 1 1 1 6/7/1999 35 5 5 5 340 6.74 5 5 5 12/13/1999 110 10 10 10 2,300 6.33 10 10 10 5/23/2000 51.9 5 5 5 516 5.22 5 5 5 10/5/2000 184.0 50 50 50 2,770 6.83 50 50 50 12/12/2001 410 100 100 300 12,000 7.31 200 200 500 3/13/2002 73 10 10 30 1400 5.96 20 20 5Q 6/28/2002 39 10 10 30 290 5.37 20 20 50 11/21/2002 260 10 10 30 2100 5.29 20 20 50 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 0.0 100,000 1.0 10,000 2.0 • _, 9.0 1,000 S f a.o a � 100 n m 5.0 m p' 6.0 10 _ _ >E— X - - �----•-- 7.0 18,0 Jurr98 Juo-99 Jun-00 Jun-01 Jun-02 Jun-03 Date (monthtyear) —Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes—*—MTBE - - A- - Water Level' Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-18 MW-19 Water Quality Stunmary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) MTBE 3,400 WaterLevelRBGS 1,3, -TMB 1,2,4-TM8 Na htialene Sam IeDate Benzene Tolwn Eth Ibsnzens At lens 10/6/1998 320 80 15 68 10 270 15,0� 7.15 10 17 100 10 100 6/7/1999 9/20/1999 3.300 1,400 54 91 120 6 000 6.48 6.71 99 1,000 12/13/1999 1,200 1.000 1 000 1,000 11,000 1120 5.23 100 100 100 5/23/2000 605 100 100 100 100 3r�r 10,400 7•54 100 100 100 1� 100 10/5/2000 1/25/2001 517 351 100 100 100 8'� 7.41 5.75 100 2p ZO 4110/2001 46.7 20 1 20 20 20 1,570 6,170 20 250 7/11 /2001 105.0 20 150 5 000 8.15 8.15 100 100 "� so 12/12/2001 140 50 50 1500 8.57 20 20 20 50 136 10 10 3/13/2002 10 10 10 30 400 s 64 2 2 1 5 6/28/2002 1 3 20 5.89 11121 /2002 2.5 1 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 100,000 — -- — P 10.000 1,000 a i � a 100 19 1 I i jUwM Jaa-01 h401 J-02 J" Doo-02 JaM98 Ju698 J-99 J" Jan-00 Data (monthlyear) —rY— Bemsne —MMTBE a - Water Level' (0 BGS) 5.0 5.5 e.o 8.5 7.0 7.5 e.0 8.5 Ju m Stratton French, CGWP MW-19 Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-20 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results is ug/L) Sample Date 10/27/1998 Benzene 270 Toluene 10 Ethylbenzene 10 X lens 10 MTBE 3,400 Water Level • Lft BGS 5.00 1,3 5-TMB 10 1,2,4-TMB 10 Naphthalene 10 6/`7/1999 110 20 20 20 1200, 6.59 20 20 20 12/13/1999 14 50 50 50 230 5.82 50 50 50 10/52000 2,050 1,050 882 4,730 350 6.91 86 242 51 1/252001 69.3 10 10 10 1.350 6.67 10 10 10 4/102001 105 20 20 20 1,520 4.W 20 20 20 12/12/2001 3/132002 92 180 50 50 50 50 150 150 3,5W 5,000 7.49 7.77 100 100 100 100 250 250 6/282002 40 5 5 15 50o 5.07 10 10 25 11212002 11 1 1 3 110 5.53 2 2 5 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 10,000 10 Jul-98 Jan-99 JUV99 JaR00 itt-w J-01 Jur01 J-02 JuE02 D-02 Date (monttdyem) ----Be--ne--X—t�17BE �b -Water Level' (ft BGS) 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 T F 8.0 u 6.5 m 7.0 7.5 8.0 JUR03 Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3262003 MW-20 MW-21 Water Quality Surrunary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/I.) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lanes MTBE Water Level' R BGS 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TAIB Naphthalene 6/7/1999 60 1 1 1 330 2.74 1 1 1 12/13/1999 5 10 10 10 130 3.04 10 10 10 10/5/2000 1 1 1 3.2 58 3.27 1 1 1 12/12/2001 1 1 1 3 71 3.11 2 2 5 3/13/2002 1 1 1 3 13 2.83 2 2 5 6/28/2002 1 1 1 3 99 2.49 2 2 5 11l21/2002 1 1 1 3 20 1.80 2 2 5 i 1000.0 1.0 Jan-99 J499 Jan-00 Ju400 Jern01 Ad-Ol Jan-02 Jul-02 Dee-02 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration ietection limits usad in anaDb below.__ Date —+— 8en a --—TaWene EtWbemmne—it--Xylenes —ill-- MTBE • • •A- - - Water LwN' (R BGS) 0.0 0.5 1.0 S f 1.5 w 2.0 p 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Jun-03 Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-21 NM-22 Water Quality Summary, Shelbume Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X Imes MTBE Water Level ` ft BGS 1 3,6-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 6/1/1999 0.5 1 1 1 4.9 5.99 1 1 1 12/13/1999 0.5 1 1 1 1 5.35 1 1 1 10/5/2000 1.4 1 1 1 61 e.43 1 1 1 1/25/2001 1.0 1 1 1 10 6.01 1 1 1 4/10/2001 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.88 1.0 1.0 1.0 7/11/2001 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 54.2 6.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 12/12/2001 5 5 5 15 410 6.85 10 10 25 3/1312002 1 1 1 3 5 5.17 2 2 5 6/28/2002 1 1 1 3 5 4.57 2 2 5 11 /21 /2002 1 1 1 3 5 4.45 2 2 5 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration 1,o00.0 0.0 - to Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-22 MW-23 Water Quality Summary, Shelbume Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample, Data Benzene Toluene Eth Ibenzene X lenes MTBE Water Level • ft BGS 1,3,6-TMB 1 24-TMB Naphthalene 6/7/1999 21 1 1 1 620 9.56 1 1 1 12/13/1999 12 1 1 1 740 8.71 1 1 1 5/23/2000 1 1 1 1 10 8.02 1 1 1 10/5/2000 37 1 1 1 1,680 9.87 1 1 1 4/10/2001 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.4 6.20 1.0 1.0 1.0 7/11/2001 18.9 MO 10.0 10.0 1,730 9.57 1.0 1.0 1.0 12/12/2001 25 25 25 125 2,400 9.98 50 50 125 3/13/2002 25 25 25 125 2,100 8.62 50 50 125 6/28/2002 25 25 25 75 1,100 8.34 50 50 125 1121/2002 25 25 25 75 2,600 8.38 50 50 125 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 10.000 - 0.0 e 6.5 ._ 1,000 �7r 7.0 sJ � • o a 7.5 o 100 a 9.0 3 • 8.5 10 9.0 ... n 9.5 c a`. --- -.- _.� ` 10.0 Ja,99 JukW J-00 JuL00 J-01 Jukol Jan-02 JU-02 Deo-02 Jur03 Date (-thry-) --�8enzene-.--MTBE - -6 - Water Level' (ft BGS) Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3/262003 MW-23 MW-24 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug(L) Sam IeDate Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE Water Level ' ttBGS 1,3,6-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 9/20/1999 150 45 32 61 860 3.32 7.7 27 5.9 12/13/1999 300 32 94 110 3,000 3.93 19 100 18 5/23/2000 1 1 1 1 10 3.37 1 1 1 1/25/2001 842 76.7 185 50 8.950 5.27 50 150 50 4110/2 001 15.3 10.0 10.0 10.0 771 2.84 10.0 10.0 10.0 7111/2 001 155.0 14.1 26.9 10.0 2,830 4.21 10.0 28.5 10.0 12/12/2001 77 25 25 125 1.300 4.60 50 50 125 3/13/2002 5 5 5 15 660 3.55 10 10 25 6/28/2002 5 5 5 15 230 3.24 10 10 25 11/21/2002 5 5 5 15 140 3.15 10 10 25 10,000 100 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 2.0 2.5 3.0 ge A c • ♦♦ ♦♦ r p 3.5 ♦a • � 4.0 c el, o 1 • ��(--- -1 4.5 n a ♦ r ♦ n n n ♦ • 5.0 ♦Id 5.5 y-99 May -DO May-01 May-02 May-03 Date (morzhlyear) +Benzene --- all -Toluene Ethylbenzene --- *-Xylenes -0 MTBE -6 - Water Level • (E BGS) Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-24 AM-25 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L.) Sample Date 9/20/1999 Benzene 1.4 Toluene 1 Eth (benzene 1 12/13/1999 0.7 1 1 10/5/2000 2.1 2 2 1/25/2001 34.9 10 10 4/10/2001 1.0 1.0 1.0 7/11/2001 5.0 5.0 50 12/12/2001 1 1 1 3/13/2002 1 1 1 6/28/2002 10 10 10 11 /21 /2002 1 1 1 10,000.0 ,a,a00.0 100.0 10.0 1.0 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below e a--- - - - -- o ' e Mar APr 00 nw-u ...... . Date (monthlyeer) 0—llerm" _-A—IV{TaE - -A - Water Level' (R BOS) ).D 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 03 Stratton French, CGWP MW-25 Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-26 (EW4) Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site 994-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lenes MTBE Water Level • ft BGS 1,3,5-TMB 1,$4-TMB Naphthalene 9/20/1999 13.000 27,000 2,700 13,000 12,000 5.89 730.0 1.600 500.0 12/13/1999 1,400 16,000 18,000 100,000 300 37,000 54,000 29,000 1/25/2001 7,720 11,100 3,080 16,000 3,500 7.34 557 2,050 360 4MO12001 4,380 4,940 1.980 10.300 1,250 5.15 591 1,860 407 7/112001 7,540 11,100 2,940 15,700 2,200 6.45 709 2,210 829 3/132002 7,300 4.100 2,600 13,000 2,500 6.12 430 2 380 6282002 5,000 3.800 2,700 11,000 1,200 5.03 500 2,,200 000 2 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used In graph below 100,000 3.00 3.50 4.D0 10LgQ1 y 4.50 5.00 S • 5.50 H i _ 8.00 U 1,000 8.50 • 7.00 d 7.50 100 8.00 Jul-99 Ja Do Jul-00 Jan-01 JUI-01 Jarr02 Jul-02 Deo-02 Date (monthNear) -�Banaena--F-TWrena Ethythemmne �F-Xyknse --NE MTBE - -d - Water Level • (11 BGS) Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3262003 MW-26 (EW-1) MW-27 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene__ Toluene Eth Ibenzene X lenes MTBE Water Level" ftBGS 1,3,5-TM8 12,4-TMB Naphthalene 9/20/1999 7.500 1,200 1,300 4,200 21,000 9.58 330 1,000 280 12/13/1999 5,800 430 1.200 5,000 16,000 6.53 190 1,100 230 5/23/2000 2,000 730 730 5,6W 4.080 4.95 131 1,180 390 1/25/2001 2,090 113 533 3,060 5,890 6.87 106 1,460 339 4/10/2001 1 368 150 191 4.800 739 5.55 543 2,400 337 7/11/2001 672 112 J 226 5,380 2.780 6.25 698 2,440 1 400 3/1312002 860 50 100 1.500 7,300 8.35 100 1,300 280 6/28/2002 170 24 45 190 480 5.33 10 270 44 11/21/2002 1,220 100 259 624 7.210 5.88 221 820 200 - shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 100,000 -__-- 10,t100 ■ p �. 1,000 100 " d 10 Jar,N Jan00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Date (montNyear) m -Tokwo —*—Xylones --*—MBE A - Water Level "(4 BOS) Jar 0w 3,0 4.0 5.0 e.0 0 7.0 B.0 8.0 100 J-04 Stratton French, CGWP Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 MW-27 EW-2 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date 1/25/2001 4/10/2 001 7/11/2001 12/12/2001 11/21/2002 Benzene 3,130 667 571 3,300 980 Toluene 125 100 8.2 100 31 Eth (benzene 1,530 291 13.6 1,300 590 X lanes 3,730 850 37.3 3,000 860 MTBE 2,950 617 309 3,800 260 Water Level" ttBGS 7.12 6.20 .0 7.39 6.03 113,5-TMB 351 115 3 200 15 12,4-TMB 1460 420 23 1,100 ` Naphthalene 326 176 49 500 1 40 - shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration 00 ¢¢ S Y F ,o,aoo 1,000 3.2 Stratton French, CGWP EW-2 Consulting Hydrologist 3/26/2003 HOFFER CONSULTING INC. 297 South Main Street Barre, Vermont 05641 (802) 476 - 2002 fax: 476 — 2525 www.hofferconsulting.com Peter B. Aldrich Andrew E. Fraser Stratton C. French, CGWP Jefferson P. Hoffer, PG CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Shelburne Road Mobil North South Burlington, Vermont SMS Site #94-1589 November 2000 Hoffer Consulting Inc. Consulting Hydrogeologists CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN SHELBURNE ROAD MOBIL NORTH SOUTH BURLINrTON, VERMONT SMS Site #94-1589 November 2000 Prepared for: Mr. Carl Ruprecht UST Manager S.B. Collins, Inc. 54 Lower Welden Street St. Albans, VT 05478 (802) 527 — 0116 Prepared By: Hoffer Consulting Inc. 297 South Main Street Barre, Vermont 05641 (802) 476 - 2002 �1 Peter B. Aldrich Project Manager Jefferson P. Hoffer, PG President/Senior Hydrogeologist HOFFER CONSULTING INC. CONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGISTS TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVESUMMARY...................................................................................................1 1.0 GENERAL SITE INFORMATION................................................................................2 1.1 Background Information................................................................................................2 1.2 Environmental Setting....................................................................................................3 1.3 Potential Receptors ... .::................................................................................................... 3 WaterSupplies.......................................................................................................3 IndoorAir Quality..................................................................................................3 SurfaceWater.........................................................................................................4 Adjacent Property Owners & Interested Parties....................................................4 1.4 Previous Investigations & Reports.................................................................................4 2.1 SITE CHARACTERIZATION DATA...........................................................................5 2.1 Hydrogeologic Setting....................................................................................................5 Stratigraphy............................................................................................................ 5 Groundwater Levels, Flow Directions, and Flow Rates........................................5 2.2 Source, Degree, and Extent of Petroleum Contamination.............................................6 SourceAreas..........................................................................................................6 Degree & Extent of Contamination........................................................................6 2.3 Remedial Alternatives Evaluated by Feasibility Investigations.....................................7 3.0 PROPOSED REMEDIAL STRATEGY......................................................................... 9 3.1 Conceptual Strategy.......................................................................................................9 3.2 Remedial Alternatives....................................................................................................9 General Discussion of The Alternatives................................................................9 3.3 Recommendations........................................................................................................10 HOFFER CONSULTING INC. CONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGISTS LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 Monitoring Well Data Summary TABLE 2 Groundwater Level Data TABLE 3 Groundwater Sampling Results for October 5, 2000 TABLE 4 Estimated Volume of Petroleum in Groundwater TABLE 5 Summary of Pilot Testing Results TABLE 6 Summary of Preliminary Cost Estimates for Remedial Alternatives TABLE 7 Cost Estimate to Proceed with SVE System Installation LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 Site Location Map FIGURE 2 Site Vicinity Map FIGURE 3 Site Map FIGURE 4 Water -Table Map, October 5, 2000 FIGURE 5 MTBE Isoconcentration Contour Map, October 5, 2000 FIGURE 6 Benzene Isoconcentration Contour Map, October 5, 2000 FIGURE 7 Total 8021B Compound Isoconcentration Contour Map, October 5, 2000 FIGURE 8 North South Cross Section FIGURE 9 East West Cross Section FIGURE 10 Conceptual Layout of Extraction Wells APPENDICES APPENDIX A Soil Boring/Monitoring Well Logs APPENDIX B Water Quality Data Summaries and 10-5-00 Analytical Data APPENDIX C Preliminary Cost Estimates for Remedial Alternatives HOFFER CONSULTING INC. CONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGISTS This Corrective Action Plan (CAP) presents a strategy to remediate subsurface petroleum contamination at the Shelburne Road Mobil North site in South Burlington, Vermont. Historical releases of petroleum have impacted soil and groundwater at the site, and indoor air quality. The releases of petroleum are associated with multiple generations of underground storage tanks and petroleum dispensers used at the site, as well as off -site releases, which have migrated to the site. Weathered, floating free -phase product has been found in three groundwater monitoring wells at the site, and has been periodically recovered by bailing. Petroleum constituents are nresent in site groundwater at concentrations exceedinc, Vermnnt Crrnnndwntar Fnfnrramant Standards. Groundwater contamination has been detected in off -property monitoring wells downgradient from the site, and data also indicate that groundwater contamination originating from upgradient properties reaches the site. Petroleum vapors were detected in the site building in 1998, and a vapor abatement system was installed at that time and is still in operation. Site investigation efforts have included the installation of numerous monitoring wells, extensive groundwater monitoring, recovery of free product by bailing, installation and operation of the vapor abatement system, and pilot -testing of soil vapor extraction (SVE) and high vacuum extraction and treatment (HEAT) technologies. Three general alternatives were evaluated against the objectives of removing gross contamination from the subsurface, and preventing the migration and accumulation of petroleum vapors in the site building. These alternatives include the installation of a HEAT or other dual -phase extraction (DPE) and treatment system, the periodic (monthly) use of a mobile HEAT or other similar DPE technology, and the installation of a conventional, low-vacuum2 soil vapor extraction (SVE) system. Based on the current site data, either a conventional SVE system or periodic use of a mobile HEAT (or other DPE system) appears capable of meeting the remedial objectives at similar costs. An SVE system will remove gross contamination from the subsurface and prevent the accumulation of petroleum vapors in the site building. Periodic visits with a mobile HEAT or other DPE system could be effective in removing gross contamination, and much more effective in addressing groundwater contamination than an SVE system. While the costs for periodic visits with a mobile HEAT approach are slightly higher than an SVE system, these costs may be justified given the added benefits provided by this approach — more directly addressing groundwater contamination and avoiding trenching. Based on our analysis of alternatives, we recommend the following; 1) proceed with the installation and testing of additional extraction wells and re-engineering/monitoring of the vent stack system, 2) schedule one initial HEAT visit by Handex of New Jersey, and 3) evaluate effectiveness of the HEAT visit and assess options for continued periodic visits using Handex's HEAT unit, the purchase/lease of a mobile HEAT or similar DPE system, or the installation of a permanent SVE system. Proceeding in this phased manner may be more cost effective than installing a permanent system at this time. The installation and testing of additional extraction wells will provide data on contaminant distribution and help in selecting which areas of the site should be targeted for remediation. . i "High -vacuum Extraction And Treatment", acronym coined by Handex of New Jersey, Inc. Z Less than 60 inches of water column HOFFER CONSULTING INC. PAGE 1 CONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGISTS 1.1 Background Information The Shelburne Road North site is located at 977 Shelburne Road (Route 7) in South Burlington, Vermont (Figure 1). The property is owned by Jolley & Associates, and the underground storage tanks are owned and operated by S.B. Collins, Inc., of St. Albans, Vermont. The site was the home of the Shelburne Road Petco gasoline station until purchased by Jolley in 1986. In 1986, the tanks from the former Petco were removed by S.B. Collins, and replaced with four single -walled tanks with a cathodic protection system. These single walled tanks were subsequently replaced in October of 1993 at which time a hole was discovered in one of the tanks. The tanks were replaced with double -walled tanks that are still active as of November 2000. The site currently operates as a Mobil gas station and convenience store. In the vicinity of the site, development along Shelburne Road is commercial. The site is bordered on the north by the entrance and parking lot to the K-Mart Plaza and a Merchants Bank branch, on the east by Shelburne Road (Route 7), on the south by Burger King, and to the west by Hannaford Foods and K-Mart. Figure 2 illustrates land uses in the vicinity. ' As illustrated on Figure 3, existing structures on the site include the convenience store and canopy over the gasoline dispensers, and a storage building located to the west of the store. The store is constructed of brick and steel construction, and the canopy and storage building are constructed of steel. The eastern portion of the property (approximately 50 %) bordering Shelburne Road is paved. Shelburne Road is paved, as are the neighboring properties to the north and south. Storm drains are present on the paved portion of the site. Other utilities at the site including electrical lines, water, storm water, and sewer lines are located below grade. The western portion of the property is currently undeveloped and is covered with grass and other low growing vegetation. HOFFER CONSULTING INC. PAGE 2 1 CONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGISTS 1.2 Environmental Setting Topographically, the region slopes slightly to the west toward Lake Champlain. Elevation at the site is approximately 210 feet above mean sea level (MSL). The site property is relatively level, although topography drops off about 10 feet to the north into the K-mart parking lot, and also drops off in the rear -half of the site property to the south behind Burger King. Surface water runoff on the paved portions of the site is directed to storm drains. Mapped hydrologic features (Figure 1) in the area include the Potash Brook to the north and an unnamed brook to the southwest. Both of these brooks waters flow in a southwesterly direction and drain into the Shelburne Bay of Lake Champlain. Neither of these brooks is within 1000 feet of the site. On the Surficial Geologic Map of Vermont (Doll, 1970), mapping units at and near the site include pebbly marine sands close to the site and easterly, and glaciolacustrine sediments of silt and clay and ice rafted boulders to the west toward Lake Champlain. Bedrock has not been encountered during drilling efforts at the site, but the Centennial Bedrock Geologic Map of Vermont (Doll, 1961) indicates that the site is situated near the contact between the Winooski Dolomite and the Monkton Quartzite of the Lower Cambrian Period. Depth to bedrock at the site is unknown. 1.3 Potential Receptors Potential receptors in the vicinity of the site are summarized below Water Supplies Residences and buildings near the site are served by the South Burlington municipal water system. A review of the VT Water Supply Division's well inventory identified no wells between the site and downgradient hydrologic features (Potash and Unnamed Brook, and Lake Champlain). Subsurface contamination at the site does not appear to pose a threat to existing sources of water supply in the vicinity. Indoor Air Quality The site is located in a commercial area with numerous pathways for petroleum vapors to migrate in the subsurface to indoor air spaces and utility transmission lines. Underground utilities at the site include water, sewer, stormwater, electrical, and control lines. Petroleum vapors have been detected inside the convenience store at the site. A vapor abatement system was installed in the crawlspace below the floor of the structure in 1998 and is still in operation. Petroleum vapors have occasionally been reported in the site building despite the continued operation of the vapor abatement fan. Buildings on adjacent properties to the north and south of the subject site (Merchants Bank, and Burger King) were evaluated for vapor migration in July 1994. No evidence of petroleum vapors was detected at that time, and no reports of petroleum odors have been received from these properties. HOFFER CONSULTING INC. PAGE 3 CONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGISTS Surface Water The nearest mapped surface water is Potash Brook, which is located about 1300 feet northwest of the site. Wetland -type vegetation is present along the western perimeter of the site property, including areas surrounding storm -water discharge pipes. Adjacent Property Owners & Interested Parties Approximate site property lines are included on Figures 2 and 3. Surrounding property owners include Southland Enterprises to the south and west, and Juster Development to the north. Juster Development PO Box 365, 6 Xavier Drive Yonkers, NY 10704 (914) 375 — 1800 City of South Burlington City Clerk 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05407 (802) 658 - 7952 1.4 Previous Investigations & Reports Southland Enterprises/Burger King 981 Shelburne Road So. Burlington, VT 05407 (802) 862 - 0202 Some of the previous reports generated for the Shelburne Road Mobil North are listed below. UST Removal and Hydrogeologic Investigation, Shelburne Mobil North, South Burlington, Vermont, January 18, 1994, Jefferson P. Hoffer, Consulting Hydrogeologist, Waterbury, Vermont. Site Investigation Activities, Shelburne Mobil North, South Burlington, September 4, 1994, Jefferson P. Hoffer, Consulting Hydrogeologist, Waterbury, Vermont. Groundwater Monitoring and Pilot Testing Results, South Burlington, August 24, 2000, Hoffer Consulting, Inc., Barre, Vermont. In addition to the listed reports, quarterly groundwater monitoring reports have been prepared and submitted since 1995. The most recent round of groundwater sampling was completed on October 5, 2000, and data from this effort are included in this report. HOFFER CONSULTING INC. PAGE 4 CONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGISTS 2.1 Hydrogeologic Setting Stratigraphy Twenty-seven groundwater -monitoring wells have been installed in the unconsolidated sediments underneath the site (see Table 1). Soil samples collected during the monitoring well drilling efforts expose a surficial layer of fill materials from ground surface to several feet deep on the subject property, and to a few feet deep on the adjacent properties. This surficial layer consists of generally fine-grained sand with some angular gravel. Presumably these materials were used to establish a surface for construction during the initial development of the properties. Native undisturbed soil at the site is generally fine-grained, consistent with the mapped surficial geology of the region. The general soil profile includes a fining downward sequence, starting with generally yellowish -brown fine sand and silty sand, with the silt content increasing with depth. A transition into gray marine clay occurs at depths ranging from about eight to twelve feet below the site grade. Subtle differences can be observed in the soil profiles due to the proximity of utilities and other underground structures. Logs for all of the site monitoring wells are compiled in Appendix A. Figures 4 and 5 are perpendicular cross sections illustrating subsurface conditions. Groundwater Levels, Flow Directions, and Flow Rates The water -table surface occurs at depths ranging from four to eight feet below grade beneath the site property, and from one to six feet in the adjacent off -site wells. Seasonal fluctuations of groundwater levels average about one to two feet for most of the wells (see Table 2). As illustrated on the cross section figures and well logs, the zone of saturation occurs within silty fine sand and silt. The underlying marine clay forms a lower -permeability base to the overlying fine sand and silt. Although no wells at the site provide data on vertical gradients, the lower permeability of the underlying marine clay likely results in a predominantly horizontal flow pattern. Figure 6 is a water -table map for October 5, 2000, and is representative of historical data. The overall flow direction at the site is northwestward toward Potash Brook. Along the southwestern portion of the site, the flow direction diverges to the southwest. The mound -like radial now pattern on the western portion of the site property may reflect the fact that the western portion of the site consists of fill materials, probably five to ten feet higher in elevation than surrounding native grade. The average linear flow velocity of groundwater is estimated to be in the range of 2 to 10 feet per year, based on slug testing of site monitoring wells (average hydraulic conductivity of 5.0 x 10-5 cm/sec). When compared to widespread extent of the contaminant plume, this estimate appears to be low. HOFFER CONSULTING INC. PAGE 5 CONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGISTS 2.2 Source, Degree, and Extent of Petroleum Contamination Source Areas Groundwater sampling data for the site indicate the widespread presence of dissolved petroleum compounds in groundwater, originating from several source areas. One known source area of petroleum releases was the location of the USTs removed in 1993 (originally installed in 1986). A hole was found in one of these USTs removed in 1993, and initial site investigation efforts targeted this area (monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-9). Additional wells (MW-10 through MW-17) were installed in 1998 after petroleum vapors were detected in the site building and beneath Shelburne Road east of the site during paving operations. Additional monitoring wells were installed in 1998 and 1999 to further evaluate downgradient contamination (MW-18 through MW-23). The remaining monitoring wells were installed during 1999 and 2000 to further delineate contamination and for corrective action pilot testing efforts. Backhoe test pits were dug in 1994 to characterize soil beneath the western half of the property. These test pits documented the presence of petroleum contamination in soils that originated from the 1993 excavation to install the USTs that are currently in use. Reportedly, contamination in this excavation originated from the original Petco USTs, although the location of these USTs (reportedly removed) is not certain. Petroleum compounds have been consistently detected in groundwater monitoring wells along Shelburne Road, the upgradient portion of the site. MTBE has been detected in MW-1 since this well was first sampled in 1993. Wells installed more recently along Shelburne Road (MW-15, 16, & 17) have also shown petroleum compounds in groundwater, suggesting that a source of contamination exists to the east of the site. The presence of petroleum contamination detected beneath Shelburne Road during paving efforts in 1998 supports this suggestion. In summary, there are multiple potential source areas of petroleum releases at the site. Degree & Extent of Contamination The results of the most recent round of groundwater sampling are compiled on Table 3. Isoconcentration contour maps for MTBE and benzene are presented on Figures 7 and 8. The MTBE and benzene isoconcentration maps show a large area of impacted groundwater, probably representing co -mingled plumes rather than one plume. Historical water -quality data for all monitoring wells are compiled in Appendix B. Contaminant concentrations have shown trends that illustrate the movement of different "slugs" of contamination. For instance, of the five monitoring wells installed in 1993 (MW-1 through MW-5), MTBE concentrations steadily but slowly dropped in each well between 1993 and the present. In MW-4, MTBE was the only compound detected at significant concentrations (1000 ug/L range) between 1993 and 1998. Since 1998, BTEX concentrations increased in MW-4 over several sampling rounds until free product was eventually detected in November 1998. In October 1998, floating free product (0.11 feet) was found in MW-12, and was believed to be weathered gasoline. As mentioned above, free product was first detected in MW-4 in November 199.8. The product in MW-4 consists of a very viscous, almost black, tar -like substance. A petroleum hydrocarbon fingerprint analysis indicated that the product in MW-4 is gasoline, although apparently very weathered. Due to the viscous nature of the product in MW-4, it is nearly impossible to gauge the product thickness in this well. On July 31, 2000, trace quantities of free product were observed HOFFER CONSULTING INC. PAGE 6 CONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGISTS in MW-26. The product found in MW-26 is similar to the product found in MW-4. The accumulation of product in these monitoring wells occurred several months after the site experienced high groundwater levels, which may have mobilized contamination. Site characterization efforts to date have not included laboratory analyses of soil. The only data collected on soil contamination at the site has included PID screening of samples collected during well installations. These PID readings are included on the well logs in Appendix A, and Table 1 includes the peak PID reading for each well. Table 4 provides estimates of the mass of petroleum in the subsurface at the site. Unfortunately, we have little data on soil contaminant concentrations. Using available analytical data for groundwater (8021B compound), the total mass of "8021B" compounds" is an estimated 16 lbs. This mass is then multiplied by a factor of 2.0, to estimate the total petroleum mass. These calculations indicate an estimated equivalent volume of 4.8 gallons of petroleum in the dissolved phase. Using a conservative estimate that the dissolved phase represents 5% to 10% of the total mass of petroleum at the site, the total mass is estimated to be 50 to 100 equivalent gallons. The estimated volume of petroleum recovered during the 8-hour HEAT pilot test was over five gallons. As a result, our mass estimate probably underestimates the total mass of petroleum in the subsurface at the site. 2.3 Remedial Alternatives Evaluated by Feasibility Investigations Several different remedial alternatives were evaluated during corrective action feasibility investigations. Specific technologies evaluated at the site included soil vapor extraction (SVE), and high vacuum extraction and treatment (HEAT 3). Separate step tests of both methods were conducted on several extraction wells to evaluate design parameters for these technologies. Both of the pilot tests indicated that there is substantial petroleum present in the vapor phase at the site that could be recovered with either of these methods. The HEAT pilot test was conducted on June 8, 2000 on two extraction wells: EW-1 and EW-2. Extraction from EW-1 at 14 inches of mercury (190 inches of water column) produced a flow of 30 to 40 CFM with a non -methane concentration of 20,000 ppm measured by FID. Two and one half hours of extraction on EW-1 recovered an estimated 4.8 gallons of petroleum. The radius of influence (ROI), using a threshold of 0.5 inches of water column, was between 15 and 20 feet. Extraction from EW-2 at 2 inches of mercury (27 inches of water) produced a flow of 50 CFM with a non -methane concentration of 25 to 50 ppm. Two hours of extraction on EW-2 only produced an estimated 0.01 gallons of petroleum. A low ROI of between 5 to 10 feet was observed. A one -hour test run on both EW-1 and EW-2 produced 50 CFM with a non -methane concentration of 2000 ppm. The estimated volume of petroleum recovered during the entire day of pilot testing was 5.34 gallons. The total volume of liquid generated was 228 gallons. The volume of petroleum remaining in dissolved phase in the recovered 228 gallons was not measured. A conventional low vacuum SVE pilot test was conducted on June 29, 2000. Three existing monitoring wells (EW-1, EW-2, and MW-2) were used as extraction wells and a vacuum was drawn on the wells using a 2-hp regenerative blower. Under vacuums ranging from 20 to 60 inches of water, Well EW-1 produced PID-measured concentrations ranging from 900 to 1100 ppm. The observed ROI was 10 to 14 feet under 20-and 60 inches of water column respectively during the EW-1 test. The test on 3 3 "High -vacuum Extraction And Treatment", acronym coined by Handex of New Jersey, Inc., the sub -contractor who was hired for the pilot test. HOFFER CONSULTING INC. PAGE 7 CONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGISTS EW-2 produced 25 to 35 CFM under vacuums of 20 and 40 inches of water, but no VOC concentrations were measured with a PID (possibly due to equipment malfunction). The pilot testing on EW-2 indicated much lower radii of influence of six and seven feet. A low vacuum test on MW-2 (due to the limited exposure of the well screen to the unsaturated zone) produced an estimated 20 CFM with a PID-measured concentration of 8.6 ppm. The ROI for the test on MW-2 was estimated to be approximately 9 feet. The low PID concentrations measured for EW-2, and its relatively small radius of influence, suggests significant dilution perhaps by "fresh" air circulating beneath the site building. A summary of pilot testing results is provided on Table 6. These extraction pilot tests targeted two areas; the west end of the store building (EW- 2), and near MW-4 where free product has been found (EW-1). The tests indicate that much more petroleum can be recovered near EW-1 than from the west end of the building. The petroleum present in the subsurface near EW-1 is downgradient from the store building, and probably is not the primary source area for vapors to migrate from. In addition to the pilot test efforts, a fan and vent stack has been in use at the site since 1998 to reduce the accumulation of petroleum vapors in the site building. This vent stack has generally been effective, although there have been occasional reports of petroleum vapors in the building from site staff. This vent stack was not formally engineered, but was installed as a temporary fix. HOFFER CONSULTING INC. PAGE 8 CONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGISTS 3.1 Conceptual Strategy The objectives of the proposed remedial strategy for the Shelburne Road Mobil North include removing gross petroleum contamination from the subsurface, and preventing the migration and accumulation of petroleum vapors in the site building. 3.2 Remedial Alternatives Based on the site characterization data, and pilot testing results, several general alternatives were identified to meet the remedial objectives; 1) installation of a conventional low vacuum SVE system, 2) installation of a HEAT or similar DPE and treatment system, 3) periodic site visits with a mobile HEAT or similar DPE system. Table 6 summarizes a cost estimate evaluation of these three alternatives. Detailed cost estimates are provided in Appendix C, and are based on an operating time period of two years. For the periodic usage of a mobile HEAT or similar DPE system, a monthly frequency was assumed (24 times over a two year period). General Discussion of The Alternatives Soil Vapor Extraction — Based on the pilot studies conducted at the site, an SVE system could be utilized to meet the remedial objectives. Extraction well placement would target "hot spots" throughout the site, and also be installed around the building to maintain a vacuum underneath the building. Pilot test data indicates that wells surrounding the building may draw in relatively "uncontaminated" air, therefore the contaminant concentrations from these wells would be relatively low. Combined with vapors extracted from "hot spots", the air treatment requirements would probably be lower than at most sites where SVE is applied. When system influent concentrations diminish with time, the treatment process could be sequentially shifted to less expensive options (i.e., catox to carbon to direct vent). -Qne disadvantage to installing a SVE system at this site is the relatively thin (5 feet or less) unsaturated zone. In addition, trenching at this site would be logistically difficult due to the numerous subsurface utilities, and the fuel and control lines. A SVE system would also be less effective in addressing dissolved -phase contamination at the site than DPE. Advantages to installing a SVE system at the site include lower installation costs as compared to other permanent systems (DPE), -treatment of only the vapor phase, and the ability to shift the treatment process to lower -cost alternatives. Operation and maintenance (O&M) costs are also estimated to be lower for SVE than the other alternatives. Based on the preliminary cost estimates summarized on Table 5, the SVE option is the least expensive, slightly less expensive than the periodic use of the mobile HEAT or HOFFER CONSULTING INC. PAGE 9 CONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGISTS similar DPE system. The detailed cost estimate for the SVE option also assumes the use of a catox throughout the two years of operation, while more cost effective options may be available as influent concentrations decline, thus reducing overall costs. Periodic HEAT Visits — Pilot testing using Handex of New Jersey's mobile HEAT system proved that this technology is a potentially viable treatment alternative for the site. Periodic site visits (monthly) could be effective in removing gross contamination, and be more effective in directly addressing dissolved phase contamination than SVE. The major advantages of this option are that it would not require any trenching or construction of permanent facilities, and would not be hindered by the shallow depth to groundwater. However, one disadvantage of periodic HEAT visits compared to a permanent system (SVE or DPE) is that there would not be a permanent vacuum surrounding the building. Asa result, this option would entail making sure the existing vent stack is successful in preventing petroleum vapor migration into the building. Although there are no fixed equipment or installation costs for the mobile HEAT technology, the estimated O&M costs are slightly higher than estimated costs for an SVE system over the same time frame. It is possible that a lower per visit cost could be negotiated with the HEAT contractor if a specified number of contracted visits are arranged. Our cost estimate assumes that the mob/demob fee is split with one other site; a further reduction is possible if other sites are included. Permanent HEAT or other Dual -Phase Extraction and Treatment System — Based on the HEAT pilot test, a permanent installation of this technology, or similar DPE system, could effectively remove gross and dissolved -phase contamination from the unsaturated and saturated zones at the site. As with an SVE system, extraction well placement would target "hot spots" throughout the site, and also be installed around the building to maintain a negative pressure in the building. An obvious advantage to this option is that dissolved -phase contamination would be directly targeted. The disadvantage is the increased treatment requirements for both liquid and vapor phases. Another disadvantage is the requirement for extensive trenching to manifold extraction wells to the treatment compound. This option is also the most expensive option from both an installation and O&M perspective. Because both air and liquids are used as contaminant carriers, capital expenditures are needed for multiple systems to treat both waste streams. A more permanent treatment building would be required to house the liquid treatment units and protect them from freezing during winter months. 3.3 Recommendations Based on the current site data, either a conventional low -vacuum SVE system or periodic use of a mobile HEAT system (or other DPE system) appear to be suitable in meeting the site remedial objectives at similar costs. An SVE system will remove gross contamination from the subsurface and prevent the accumulation of petroleum vapors in the site building. A permanently installed HEAT system or other DPE system could accomplish the same goals, and would also more directly address dissolved -phase contamination. However, a significantly higher expense would be incurred. Periodic visits with a mobile HEAT or other DPE system would be effective in removing gross contamination, and much more effective in addressing groundwater contamination than an SVE system. While the costs for periodic visits with a mobile HEAT or other DPE system are slightly higher than an SVE system, these costs may be HOFFER CONSULTING INC. PAGE 10 CONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGISTS justified given the added benefits provided by this approach — more directly addressing groundwater contamination and avoiding trenching. Based on this analysis of alternatives, we recommend the following; 1) Proceed with the installation and testing of additional extraction wells and re- engineering/monitoring of the vent stack system, 2) Schedule one initial HEAT visit by Handex of New Jersey, 3) Evaluate effectiveness of the HEAT visit and assess options for continued periodic visits using Handex HEAT unit, the purchase/lease of a mobile HEAT or similar DPE system (for use at this and possibly other sites), or the installation of a permanent SVE system. Proceeding in this phased manner may be more cost effective than installing a permanent system at this time. The installation and testing of additional extraction wells will provide data on contaminant distribution and help in selecting which areas of the site should be targeted for remediation. A tentative spacing of additional extraction wells is shown on Figure 10, and is based on ROIs calculated from the pilot tests. We recommend re -drilling MW-10, MW-12, and MW-27 (which were installed as 1.5-inch diameter wells) and installing 2-inch diameter wells screened from two to twelve feet below grade in boreholes advanced using 6.25- inch hollow -stem augers. Up to seven more new extraction wells would also be installed, surrounding the site building and outward from the zones of greatest contamination as defined by groundwater data. Upon installation of the initial wells, a short-term SVE pilot test would be conducted on each well using a generator and 1-hp blower. A vacuum will be applied to each well for a period of 30 minutes, during which time the effluent concentration will be measured using a PID and the ROI will be monitored with magnehelic gauges in nearby wells. This data will be used to select locations for additional extraction wells, and as a guide in choosing wells for future extraction efforts. During the installation and testing of extraction wells, a more detailed evaluation and monitoring of the vent stack will be conducted. The purpose of this effort will be to evaluate the vent stack's performance, and make any modifications that may be necessary to ensure continued effectiveness in preventing petroleum vapor accumulation in the building. We plan to hire a radon remediation contractor to evaluate the existing system and make any modifications as necessary. After installing and testing the extraction wells, a one -day HEAT visit would be scheduled and conducted. The selection of extraction wells for the HEAT system would be based on the extraction testing results. During the HEAT process, HCI personnel will monitor ROIs and water levels. After the first HEAT visit, a detailed report will be prepared summarizing the results of the extraction well installation/testing, vent stack evaluation/modifications, and the HEAT extraction process. A cost estimate to proceed is provided in Table 7. HOFFER CONSULTING INC. PAGE 11 CONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGISTS TABLE 1 Monitoring Well Data Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. WELL ID Ground Surface Elevation (ft mi.) Top of PVC Elevation (ft ral.) Top of Screen (ft BGS) Bass of Screen (ft BGS) Elev. of Top of of Screen (feet rel.) Elm of Base of of Screen (feet mi.) minimum Depth To Water (feet) Maximum Depth To Water (fast) Minknum Lineal. Screen (feet) Maximum Unsat. Screen (feet) MIN. Unsat. Below Grade (fast) MAX Lineal. Below Grade (lost) Depth To GRAY CLAY (feet) Elev. of GRAY CLAY ((est mi.) Maxknum PID Hasdspace for Soil Samples Collected During Drilling Depth I El- Soil (feet) (feet mi.) PID (ppm) Max. Free Product Thickness (feet) GROUNDWATER ANALYSES 1015100 1015100 BENZENE MTBE (ugtL) (uyL) MW-1 100.32 100.23 4.75 14.75 95.48 85.48 5.56 6.52 0.81 1.77 5.65 6.61 12 88.3 no elevated readings < 1 129 MW-2 99.31 98.77 4.00 14.00 94.77 84.77 4.72 6.11 0.72 2.11 5.26 6.65 14 85.3 6.5 92.8 > 2500 59.7 < 20 MW-3 98.99 98.74 5.00 15.00 93.74 83.74 4.51 7.04 -0.49 2.04 4.76 7.29 13 86.0 9 90.0 5.8 69.5 3220 MW-4 98.19 98.00 4.75 14.75 93.25 83.25 5.13 7.56 0.38 2.81 1 5.32 7.75 13 85.2 no elevated readings trace' MW-5 99.28 98.65 4.00 14.00 94.65 84.65 4.92 6.42 0.92 2.42 5.55 7.05 11 88.3 no elevated readings 81.5 411 MW-8 87.90 87.68 2.50 7.50 85.18 80.18 0.36 6.42 -2.14 3.92 0.58 6.64 3.2 84.7 no elevated readings MW-9 89.27 88.75 2.00 7.00 86.75 81.75 0.10 2.69 -1.90 0.69 0.62 3.21 3.2 86.1 no elevated readings 2.2 220 MW-10 99.92 99.62 2.50 12.50 97.12 87.12 6.33 6.74 2.83 4.24 5.63 7.04 8.5 91.4 6 93.9 1874 3950 2530 MW-11 100.43 100.08 2.50 12.50 97.58 87.58 5.66 7.03 3.16 4.53 6.01 7.38 >10 <90.4 6.5 93.9 1894 3960 916 MW-12 100.06 99.71 2.60 12.60 97.11 87.11 5.23 6.57 2.63 3.97 5.58 6.92 >11.5 <88.6 5.5 94.6 1 >2000 0.14 3420 2390 MW-13 99.57 99.37 2.00 12.00 97.37 87.37 5.19 6.22 3.19 4.22 5.39 6.42 >10 < 89.6 no elevated readings < 1 < 10 MW-14 99.97 99.68 2.00 12.00 97.68 87.68 5.02 5.74 3.02 3.74 5.31 6.03 > 12 < 88 no elevated readings < 1 < 10 MW-15 100.15 99.88 2.30 12.30 97.58 87.58 5.07 5.82 2.77 3.52 5.34 6.09 9 91.2 9 1 91.2 1 902 3.9 <20 MW-16 100.02 99.72 2.50 12.50 97.22 87.22 5.15 5.97 2.65 3.47 5.45 6.27 10 90.0 no elevated readings MW-17 99.79 99.36 2.50 12.50 96.86 86.86 4.63 5.22 2.13 2.72 5.06 5.65 > 14 <85.8 no elevated readings MW-18 98.83 98.53 2.50 12.50 96.03 86.03 5.22 6.94 2.72 4.44 5.52 7.24 no elevated readings 184 2770 MW-19 99.17 98.99 5.00 15.00 93.99 83.99 5.23 7.54 0.23 2.54 5.41 7.72 no elevated readings 517 10400 MW-20 97.40 97.28 2.60 12.50 94.78 84.78 4.71 6.91 2.21 4.41 4.83 7.03 > 13 <84.4 2.5 1 94.9 1 30 2050 350 MW-21 94.20 94.08 1.50 9.00 92.58 85.08 2.74 3.27 1.24 1.77 2.86 3.39 no elevated readings < 1 57.8 MW-22 97.11 96.73 2.50 12.50 94.23 84.23 5.35 6.43 2.85 3.93 5.73 6.81 > 15 <82.1 no elevated readings 1.4 60.9 MW-23 98.96 98.90 3.90 1190 95.00 85.00 8.02 9.87 4.12 5.97 8.08 9.93 no elevated readings 37 1680 MW-24 93.39 93.26 1.50 9.50 91.76 83.76 3.37 4.54 1.87 3.04 3.50 4.67 7 86.4 no elevated readings 236 4330 MW-25 92.52 92.35 1.50 9.50 90.85 82.85 3.39 3.80 1.89 2.30 3.56 3.97 9 83.5 no elevated readings 2.1 237 MW-26 (EW-1) 99.03 98.76 2.00 12.00 96.76 86.76 7.13 7.13 5.13 5.13 7.40 7.40 11 88.0 7 1 92.0 1 > 2000 MW-27 99.45 99.17 3.00 13.00 96.17 1 86.17 4.95 6.53 1.95 3.53 1 5.23 6.81 12 87.5 no elevated readings trace' EW-2 100.01 99.56 2.00 1 12.00 1 97.56 1 87.56 1 5.52 t 6.74 1 3.52 11 4.74 1 5.97 1 7.19 11 89.0 10 90.0 1785 R BGS = feet below ground surface It rel. = feet relative to arbitray on -site elevation of 100.00 feet (surveyed September 2000) 'trace - actual thickness difficult to determine due to viscous nature of product Hoffer Consulting Inc., 11/28/00 TABLE 2 Groundwater Level Data, Shelburne Road Mobil North, South Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. DEPTH TO WATER MEASUREMENTS (feet below TOC) MonttVDay Apr-D6 Apr-27 Jun-13 Aug-17 Oct-27 Jan-23 Jan-23 Jun-26 Au9-14 Nov-18 Mar-28 Aug-25 Apr-09 May-27 Oct-06 Jun-07 Dec-13 May-23 Jun-08 Oct-05 min max fluct. Year 1995 1995 1995 1995 1995 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1997 1997 1998 1998 1998 1999 1999 2000 2000 2000 (ft) (0) (ft) MWA 5.89 6.02 6.25 5.62 5.92 5.74 5.74 5.97 6.36 5.94 5.84 5.80 5.56 6.11 6.01 6.28 6.15 5.57 6.52 5.56 6.52 0.96 MW-2 5.57 5.42 5.71 5.49 5.68 5.97 5.97 5.04 5.58 5.76 5.56 5.71 4.72 5.62 5.91 5.81 5.97 4.77 5.15 6.11 4.72 6.11 1.39 MW-3 6.12 6.12 6.48 6.08 6.18 6.15 6.15 5.75 6.51 6.41 5.82 6.51 4.51 6.95 6.89 6.90 7.04 5.84 6.38 7.04 4.51 7.04 2.53 MW4 6.22 6.29 6.86 6.24 6.01 5.64 6.81 6.28 5.76 6.71 5.13 6.53 6.27 7.56 5.13 7.56 2.43 MW-5 5.65 5.69 5.94 5.63 5.83 5.98 5.98 5.23 5.89 5.92 5.43 5.96 4.92 6.16 6.32 6.24 6.42 5.14 5.62 6.42 4.92 6.42 1.50 MW-8 1.19 0.36 1.65 1.54 0.60 6.42 6.42 2.36 1.72 1.82 0.65 1.83 0.68 0.88 1.08 0.86 0.98 2.24 1.34 0.36 6.42 6.06 MW-9 1.03 0.20 2.06 1.38 0.50 2.69 2.69 1.27 1.93 1.74 2.23 0.10 0.81 0.83 1.78 0.71 1.15 1.23 0.10 2.69 2.59 MW-10 6.10 6.27 6.47 6.53 5.33 5.68 6.74 5.33 6.74 1.41 MW-11 6.60 6.64 6.95 6.89 5.66 6.03 7.03 5.66 7.03 1.37 MW-12 - 5.84 5.96 6.45 6.31 5.23 5.52 6.57 5.23 6.57 1.34 MW-13 5.62 5.51 6.22 5.93 5.19 6.18 5.19 6.22 1.03 MW-14 5.32 5.02 5.51 5.16 5.74 5.57 5.02 5.74 0.72 MW-15 5.41 5.21 5.60 5.41 5.07 5.82 5.07 5.82 0.75 MW-16 5.63 5.52 5.79 5.63 5.15 5.97 5.15 5.97 0.82 MW-17 4.90 4.73 5.16 4.91 - 4.63 5.22 4.63 5.22 0.59 MW-18 6.94 6.74 6.33 5.22 6.83 5.22 6.94 1.72 MW-19 6.31 7.15 6.71 5.23 7.54 5.23 7.54 Z31 MW-20 5.60 6.59 5.82 4.71 6.91 4.71 6.91 2.20 MW-21 2.74 3.04 3.27 2.74 3.27 0.53 MW-22 5.99 5.35 6.43 5.35 8.43 1.08 MW-23 9.56 8.71 8.02 9.87 8.02 9.87 1.85 MW-24 3.93 3.37 4.54 3.37 4.54 1.17 MW-25 3.39 3.80 1 6 3.39 3.80 0.41 MW-26 (EW-1) 7.13 7.13 713 0.00 MW-27 6.53 4.95 5.18 1 1 4.95 6.53 1.58 EW-2 5.52 1 6.74 1 5.52 6.74 1.22 4.0 4.5 V t~ 5.0 O -�- MW-1 _3 i J3 -ar MW-2 .. 5.5 d MW-3 .'�. -1f- MW-4 m x- MW-5 IQ 6.0 - MW-10 O -MW-11 O 6.5 :- MW-12 (D O - :s 7.0 a m 0 7.5 Ix 8.0 Dec.94 Jun-95 Dec-95 Jun-96 Dec-96 Jun-97 Dec-97 Jun-98 Dec-98 Jun-99 De 99 Jun-00 Dec-00 Jun-01 Hoffer Consul8ng ft.. I WN00 TABLE Groundwater sampling results for October 5, 2000, Shelburne Road Mobil North, South Burlington, Vermont, SMS Site #94-1589. ANALYSES BY E P A M E T H 0 D 8 0 2 1 B (results In micrograms per liter) WELL MTBE Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Total 1,3,5-Tri- 1,2,4-Tri- Napthalene ID Xylenes methylbenzene methylbenzene MW-1 129 W5, MW-2 59.7 4 9.2 62.5 10.2 11.3 24.9 3220 69.5 N�ffi` 1*1 fiffl-RIVIN P MW-3 81.5 MW-5 411 220 2.2 x Ph MW-9 MW-10 2530 3950 65.2 1830 5940 502 1590 493 MW-11 916 3960 138 1220 3070 218 798 249 MW-12 / duplicate 2390/2070 3420/3440 111/141 1020/1200 2030/2510 633/788 1760/1390 1150/861 MW-13 N § NE Its ax V, I fti' N 1 MW-14 10 TIN MW-15 W, g 3.9 3.3 15.6 31.4 11.8 99.1 12.1 MW-18 2770 184 �gg MW-19 10400 517 355 W-Z. -4 ME- gW in ig1 I MW-20 350 2050 1050 882 4730 86.1 242 50.9 MW-21 57.8 60.9 1.4 7 ap'7' MW-22 MW-23 1680 37 MW-24 4330 236 "k, g I M "N rYP V 237 2.1 -R, MR Z f OxsMW-25 M mnWX�M" �i -111-W"A- yf -."' Field Bi 'P yg' ank Trip Blank M. VTGES 40 5.0 1000 700 10000 4.0 5.0 20 NOTES. < 1.0 = less than a detection limit of 1.0 micrograms per liter VT GES = Vermont Primary Groundwater Enforcement Standard (Groundwater Protection Rule & Strategy, 11/15/97) Analyses performed by ENDYNE. Inc. Hoffer Consulting Inc., 11/28/00 TABLE 4 Contaminant Mass Estimate, Shelburne Road Mobil North, South Burlington, Vermont, SMS Site #94-1589. MASS OF DISSOLVED 8021E COMPOUNDS IN GROUNDWATER, WITH FIVE FOOT IMPACTED THICKNESS Total Concentrations* Estimated Net Impacted Impacted Impacted Greater Average Total Area for Est. Soil Water" Water 8021E 8021B Than Concentration Area Calculation Thickness Volume Volume Volume Mass Mass (mg/L) (mg/L) (sq ft) (sq ft) (feet) (cu ft) (cu ft) (liters) (g) (Ibs) 10 12 7000 7000 5 35000 10500 297360 3568.32 7.89 1 3.5 28000 21000 5 105000 31500 892080 3122.28 6.90 0.1 0.25 65000 44000 5 220000 66000 1869120 467.28 1.03 TOTAL DISSOLVED 8021E COMPOUNDS (Ibs) 15.82 Convert Total Dissolved 8021 B Compound Mass to Total Petroleum (multiply by factor of 2.0), lbsi 31.64 gallonsl 4.8 ASSUME Dissolved Phase is 5% to 10% of Total Calculate Total Volume if Dissolved Phase is 5%1 96 Calculate Total Volume if Dissolved Phase is 10%1 48 NOTES 8 CONVERSIONS ', BTEX, MTBE, TMBs, Naphthalene by 8021B "assume porosity of 30% 1 cu ft = 28.32 liters 1 gram = 0.00221 Ibs 1 lb total petroleum = 6.6 gallons Hoffer Consulting Inc., 11/28/00 TABLE 5 Summary of SVE & HEAT Pilot Testing Data, Shelburne Road Mobil North, South Burlington, Vermont, SMS Site #94-1589. HEAT PILOT TEST, June 8, 2000 EXTRACTION WELL Vacuum in. Hg in. water Flow (CFM) Duration (minutes) Non -Methane PPM (FID) ROI (ft) at 0.1"/wc Hydrocarbon Recovery Rate Ibs/hr EW-1 10 - 14 135 - 190 25 - 50 180 4100 - 24000 15 EW-2 2.0 - 5.0 27 - 68 42 - 50 120 25 - 70 26 0.017 - 0.04 EW-1 & EW-2 2 27 50 60 1915 -1970 1.3 - 1.4 Total Removed in 6 hours of venting, 32.93 Ibs petroleum (5.34 gallons) SVE PILOT TEST, June 29, 2000 EXTRACTION WELL Vacuum in. Hg in. water Flow (CFM) Duration (minutes) Non -Methane PPM (PID) ROI (ft) at 0.5" /wc EW-1 1.5 20 55 30 870 11 EW-1 3.0 40 65 30 1100 12 EW-1 4.4 60 75 30 1100 14 EW-2 1.5 20 26 30 0* 6 EW-2 3.0 40 33 30 0.8* 7 MW-2 1.5 20 20 30 8.8 15 * equipment malfunctioned Hnffar r:nnci dtinn Inc 11 /9R/nn I D C D 7'� TABLE 6 Summary of Preliminary Cost Estimates for Remedial Alternatives Shelburne Road North Mobil, South Burlington, Vermont, SMS Site #94-1589. SVE Installed DPE Mobile DPE HCI LABOR $24,740 $31,820 $4,710 HCI INTERNAL EXPENSES $4,145 $3,820 $507 EXTERNAL EXPENSES $35,970 $70,400 $0 SUB -CONTRACTORS $25,850 $43,274 $8,470 INSTALLATION COST $90,705 $149,314 $13,687 HCl LABOR $21,960 $22,180 $17,360 HCI INTERNAL EXPENSES $5,148 $5,148 $2,924 EXTERNAL EXPENSES $10,450 $19,360 $0 SUB -CONTRACTORS $5,434 $4,950 $64,020 ANNUAL O&M $42,992 $51,638 $84,304 Installation & Two Year O&M $176,689 $252,590 $1821295 0 Hoffer Consulting Inc., 11/28/00 TABLE 7 Cost Estimate to Proceed With Extraction Well Installation, Vent -Stack Monitoring & HEAT System Application (one day) Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589 pp v Project Management Principal 4 $55 $220 Project Management/Scheduling Proj. Mgr 8 $50 $400 Extraction Well Installation/Pilot Testing Proj. Mgr 60 $50 $3,000 Extraction Well Pilot Testing Proj. Scientist 20 $40 $800 Vent Stack Evaluation/Engineering/Monitoring Proj. Mgr 16 $50 $800 HEAT System Supervision/Monitoring Proj. Mgr 12 $50 $600 Evaluation/Report Preparation Proj. 40 $50 $2,000 Evaluation/Report Preparation Principal 8 $55 $440 HCI Labor $8,260 Mileage -Extraction Well Installation & Testing (6 trips) 840 $0.35 $294 PID Rental (5 days, of drilling & pilot testing) 5 $75 $375 Generator & 1 HP Blower Rental (2 days) 2 $100 $200 Vapor -Phase Carbon Drum, Delivery/Disposal 1 $1,000 $1,000 Mag Gauges, Air Sampling Pump 2 $25 $50 Survey Equipment Rental 1 $35 $35 Misc. Equipment Rental 1 $75 $75 Mileage - Vent Stack Monitoring/HEAT Visit (3 trips) 450 $0.35 $158 PID Rental - Vent Stack/HEAT (3 days) 3 $25 $75 Mag Gauges, Air Sampling Pump (HEAT) 1 $25 $25 HCI Internal Expenses 1 $2,287 1 LY BC�FIACT9tSr.gs;. Q��. ;� g,gr ,= i qu.4'k+ '' ,-.{.Xay';d�ii rW1 YJl' d3 Drilling Sub-Contractpr (3 Re -Drills & 7 New Wells)# $6,500 $0 $6,500 Vent Stack Contractor/Materials $1,200 $0 $1,200 HEAT Contractor - $3,600 per visit ($1100 mob*, $2500 day rate) $3,600 $0 $3,600 Drums (includes drum, transport,disposal), 250 gals/5 drums $1,250 $0 $1,250 # 10 wells, 2-inch screened from 2 - 12 feet, 6.25-inch HSA * assumes $2100 mob. is split with one other site ** no markup if billed direct to S.B. Collins Sub -Contractor Expense 1 $6,050 ESTIMATED TOTAL $16,597 Hoffer Consulting Inc., 11/28/00 Basemap Enlarged from USGS Topographic Map of Burlingon,:VT, Photorevised 1987 Contour Interval 20 feet 1000 FEET SCALE BAR FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP SHELBURNE ROAD MOBIL NORTH SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT SMS SITE #94-1589 coffer Consultinq Inc. Consulting Hydrogeologiotoi .• .. � ,mot _ M IF Ir m _ I M ss fW y a e 01 e �e - _ 'a ,fir •�' Y e x-t IF wr • -! 27, . �#yr ��,.v,izy� -!' � - � •� �'1�'tie. 3.� �x �2 ��� x }. 3 's - x 43, NO •'n° 3-Feab Yt..,'IN e+ _ .-�'$+'i�� ' _ - f• 9#rtC�" f - �"ywxwn'' -�+ukyy,y�•= lz'M+�w�S+•{.. ti--�_ a __ I t f _.. a arr � iF � � - �. {{X B MW-8 9 MW-9 — — —property line— — — B MW-23 Entrance & Parking Lot for K-Mart MW-7 S (destroyed) ,r0 MW-6 (destroyed) PROPERTY OF JUSTER DEVELOPMENT B MW-25 B MW-24 — — I AMW-0 � I EXPLANATION MW-103 Q� GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL AD-3 O SOIL VAPOR MONITORING POINT 7�T MW-3 B MW-5 20 former EW-1 usts g 9 (MW-26) aMyl-2emovedyAD 1OOAD 2 n 1993 r ?- B MW-27 B MW-10 O AD-3 existing EW-2STORE canopy B MW-19 lists MW-11 MW-20 MW-12 pavement Shelburne Road MW-1 I I S MW-16 grass I MW-15 9 I & MW-17 I I MW-18& MW-14 MW-22 grass pavement MW-13 B I property line- — — — — — — — — — PROPERTY OF SOUTHLAND ENTERPRISES Burger SCALE 1 inch = 50 feet King FIGURE 3 0 1/2 1 inches MW--21 SITE B A S E M A P SHELBURNE ROAD MOBIL NORTH 0 25 50 feet SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, SMS SITE #94-1589 1 1-2-00 Hoffer Consulting Inc. Consulting Hydrogeologiete NORTH SOUTH fmr USTs STORE Closed B L D G 100 — in 1993 I fine MW-13 Burger MW-2 I MW-10 MWi12 sandy loam King grading MW-5 I I Into silty fine sand K-Mart and silt Max. Water Table Parking > 2000 _ Lot 1 874 Min. Water Table l- > 25001111 LU 74141. NP AWN 90 T ds� r a err x..29ra7 t5. J" xA �Ksr `e-ir fin.- I 3 T '�,�r fi A ,,. ^iMWOmRW W a f - �. 1!ss� > s� R# 3s p k �xv acLYiv --1 t rs" s.fi S` �� .l r 3'• .-c _- _ s F'�;�E ` 3` _sr.. �s .YR 4.' .�. y.. w:--�..'`.k-R�"-t`„" yips -mot ems" M < 1 0Z� W y�. Y�rL ti y \� q M-2530�M 239Oryc'�yc yyvfA �FiB <4�f;t`.. >¢ _ \\ �?" B 3950 Se2B 3420 e�'����ct�s t— �F-,x ..: < '>r%,. �'�',c�,,_s'9� - s� sLFst� A#cam ya�t-�,7�` .7 E^r^e 4A_ �'�" - R- "" '�-• z, saeIR Ai (L 3' 3Y2 M= 4 1 1 -'�'- R' ;' „✓ r sa; ..� B B 1. 5 r B 5 8 7 ur �r-td t K"` m rs.', - :..fi` r• : s.>' y t.r. N Vertical ;•.- �t ,�4.,ua' yA,.-S'�x .,.,� Exaggeration -�. ,t�,TE'AT,3 •:..� tip s <�- x u.' _ . = 5 ii rT ¢y r"'zii xy ka' 4._ '�' .4 �is +3ti `r° .i�, ""�-,�e�• '-'g aE.. fi <.,�.. Ys'- 2k}' ,� Z. 4 ^w,, �, L'.., ,'��_.,,,. *s '�'r�, �k-"t`. r-s .? C........ ^n'� ,v- - _.s- `' -�'•,�. *fit-,r+G• fi `��.. r a - �. �,-�'.s`` z- fw G �'`�, 25 Feet 80 MW-12 (Monitoring Well) > 2000 -I► (Soil Sample PID Headspace, ppm) M=2390(M = MTBE, ug/Liter, 10-5-00) B=3420(B = Benzene, ug/Liter, 10-5-00) FIGURE 4 North South Cross Section, Shelburne Road Mobil North, South Burlington, Vermont, SMS Site #94-1589. (Hoffer Consulting Inc. Consulting Hydrogeologiotol Canopy EAST WEST I - M i 12 (Monitoring Well) > 2000 -0- (Soil Sample PlD Headspace, ppm) M=2390(M = MTBE, ug/Liter, 10-5-00) 8=3420(B = Benzene, ug/Liter, 10-5-00) ne t 7) •100 Table Table A m r 90 m m r m D O Z m m 80 FIGURE 5 West East Cross Section, Shelburne Road Mobil North, South Burlington, Vermont, SMS Site #94-1589. IHoffcr Consulting Inc. Consulting Hydrogcologistsl r� — — _property line_ — — B MW-22 90.30 SCALE 1 inch = 50 feet 0 1/2 1 inches 0 25 50 feet 11-2-00 Entrance & Parking Lot for K-Mart — — SMW-25 88.59 MW-7 (destroyed) MW-6 (destroyed) N -{ — ,MW-24, 88.72 MW_3& MW-5 4 91.70 � 92.23 former B si usts 1 (MW-226) Mw 21removedl O Ogg? g ?9 93 R MW-189 91.70 grass pavement i i Burger King i e MW-21 MW-13, 93.19 EXPLANATION MW-1 MONITORING WELL & 93.71 WATER -TABLE ELEVATION (FEET) WATER -TABLE CONTOUR (FEET) -o-- — — GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION pavement Shelburne Road MW 1 93.71 I &MW-16 93.75 grass • I MW-15 94.06 / BMW-17 94.14 I I MW-14, 94.11 B I 90.81 FIGURE 6 WATER -TABLE MAP, OCTOBER 5, 2000 SHELBURNE ROAD MOBIL NORTH SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, SMS SITE #94-1589. Hoffer Consulting Inc. Consulting Hydrogeologicto EXPLANATION MW 8 N MW-5 Not MONITORING WELL & Sampled 411 MTBE CONCENTRATION (UG/L) MW-7 (destroyed) � MTBE ISOCONCENTRATION — W CONTOUR (UG/L) Entrance & Parking _ GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION Lot for K-Mart MW-6 (destroye &MW-9 220 1 1 1 pavement -- -- -- --I -- (923V7-25 S4 3024 -- — — MW-3S MW-5 MW-4 Free 3220 411 Product \ n7 former O � � EW-1 ( MW-26 ) Mw-2� remmovoved'', < 1 1 \ 20 s' in 1993 O a x Shelburne I \P=f?o Road — — —property line— — — I 1 1 1 \ SIVIW27 \ BMW-10 129 129 r�<1530 MIW-16 Not MW-20 \ 350 pC —���� �'�: O existing 2 \ \ Sampled 1 1 1 \ B F10400 usts canopy \ grass \ 916 916 MW-23 168 1680 \ MW-12 MW-15 < 20 1 1 \ 2390 1 1 19 MW-17 \ ` _ Not Sampled I MW-18 9 2770 MW-14 MW-22 60.9 grass Pavement 10 <10 < 1 0 � I -- -- -- -- -- —� i Burger i King SCALE 1 inch = 50 feet e MW-21 0 112 1 inches 57.8 FIGURE 7 MTBE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR MAP, OCTOBER 5, 2000 0 25 50 feet SHELBURNE ROAD MOBIL NORTH SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, SMS SITE #94-1589. 11-2-00 Hoffer Consulting Inc. Consulting Hydrogeologists 11111W. -.ice .., ..."ANINNEW,:.,.: .;fi.i : ; J111111111W 1� ;'-.: 1wL = �-:..-!<f w.,..C!r��.r.uwn�7s:.;� s-�� ��.T �,. _ __ _ J N Not MW-6 Sampled MW-7 ti (destroyed) BMW-9 2.2 erty line_ — B MW-23 37 MW-22 1.4 SCALE 1 inch = 50 feet 0 1/2 1 inches 0 25 50 feet 11-2-00 Entrance & Parking Lot for K-Mart SMW-25 2.1 I MW-6 (destroyed) H BMW-24 — — — 236 M W -3 B MW-4 , 69.5 \Free \ Product SEW-1 (MW-26) O O \ EXPLANATION MW-5 411 MONITORING WELL & BENZENE CONCENTRATION (UG/L) �;{� —W BENZENE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR (UG/L) GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION pavement M-5 l former n usts removed �i 933i Afts .11- \ Shelburne I Road MW-2\ \ MW 1 &MW-10 < 1 IW-16 1 1 1 1 1 1 3950 \ & SM MW-20 O \ Not Sampled \ 2050 existrng 2 �9 canopy grass \ MW-19 lists MW-11 517 3960 \ MW-15 \ MW-12 3.9 \ 420 \ J Not Sampled I MW-18 & 184 M W-14� MW-13 � 1 rass pavement <1 � I i Burger King i i MW-21 ` 1 FIGURE 8 BENZENE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR MAP, OCTOBER 5, 2000 SHELBURNE ROAD MOBIL NORTH SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, SMS SITE #94-1589. Hoffer Goneultin6i Inc. Consulting Hydrooeologisto MW-8 Not Sampled BMW-9 235 — — _property tine_ — — t9 MW-23 1837 SCALE 1 inch = 50 feet 0 1/2 1 inches 0 25 50 feet 1 1-2-00 Hoffer Consulting Inc. Entrance & Parking Lot for K-Mart MW-7 ti (destroyed) MW-6 (destroyed) 09 EXPLANATION MW-5 MONITORING WELL & 411 B TOTAL 8021 B COMPOUNDS (UG/L) ISOCONCENTRATION —W CONTOUR (UG/L) t I t pavement S 5W-25 SMW-24 — — — — — — — — —I 4870 3& -5 MW 4 3590550 Free Product �z "�#``w z „ former t; 4 ust's t EW-1 (PAW-26) 'MtN-2 removed t t O 192 ? in 1993 Shelburne O uw* +w1g I Its l9MW-27 Mw_1 &MW-10 136 16900 B SNo -16 MW-20 O Sampled 3450 9 existing && canopy grass ustSO MW-11 11770 1770 10570 9 MW-15 MW-12 �197 12514 1 1 9 MW.17 Not I Sampled I I MW-18 3254 MW-14 MW6-22 IaSS pavement MW-13 I e FIGURE 9 M672 TOTAL 8021 B COMPOUND ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR MAP, OCTOBER 5, 2000 SHELBURNE ROAD MOBIL NORTH SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, SMS SITE #94-1589. Consulting Hydrogeologists B MW-8 B MW-9 — — _property line_ — — MW-23 MW-7 (destroyed) Entrance & Parking Lot for K-Mart EXPLANATION MW-103 Q5 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL AD-3 O SOIL VAPOR MONITORING POINT N MW-6 (destroyed) pavement � MW_25 � MW-24 — — — — — MW-3 —MW 5 — — — — — — — —) B 9 r MW-4 B former usts 1 O B EW-1 ( -2 MW-2 removed in 199311 Shelburne OAD-2Road I S MW-27 I ROl = 15 feet existing B Mw-to s -1 S►.iw-1s usts B Ew-z 9B ROl = 10 feet rass B MW-19 MW-11 � 9 MW-20 l � 9 I MW-12 MW-15 9 9 I W-17 l I MW-189 MW-14 M W -22 L� grass pavement MW-13 I Burger SCALE 1 inch = 50 feet King FIGURE 10 0 1/2 1 inches MW--21 CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT OF EXTRACTION WELLS �Q SHELBURNE ROAD MOBIL NORTH 0 25 50 feet SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, SMS SITE #94-1589 11-2-00 Hoffer Consulting Inc. Consulting Hydrogeologist5 SOIL BORING/MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Well/Boring ED: MW-1 Project Name:' S.B. Collin0belbume Mobil North WFLL CONSTRUCTION Site: 977 Shelbume Ave, south Burlington, V I Total Depth Drilled: 15' BGS Screen Type/lnterval: 2" PVC, 10-slot from 4.75 to 14.75' BGS Project Number. 04-06 Driller. Tri-State Drilling & Boring/Neal Faulkner Sandpack Type/Interval: c sand, 3.25 -15' BGS Drilling Method: 4.25" ID HSA Riser Type/Interval: 2" PVC from 0-4.75' BGS Geologist: J. Hoffer Seal Type/Intervah Benseal granular bentonite, 1 - 3.25' BGS Sampling Method: 2" split spoon Measuring Point/Stickup: top of PVC Casing, -0.15' BUS Date/Time Started: 11/I1/93, 0900 Water Level/DawTime: 11/18/93, 0800, 6.02' BTOC Date/Time Completed: 11/11/93, 1030 Elevation of Top of PVC: 'relative to on -site benchmark Weather: 40 degrees, overcast, windy Well Development: Bailer Surface Conditions: grass (near air ) Split -Spoon Depth Sample Blows Sample Recovery Sample Description (color, texture, etc.) PID* Reading (feet) (per 6") (feet) (ppm) 5 - 7' 1/3/5/6 2.0 0.5' - dark grayish brown fine sandy loam 0.5 0.5' - light yellowish brown f/m sand with silt, 0.5 red -brown mottling 1.0' light gray m/c sand, loose, wet, 0.7 tio of spoon - brown fine sand with silt, mottled 7.5 - 9.5 31414/7 2.0 Olive -brown silt with some (<20%) fine sand, 7.5-8.0' = 0.6 fum, moist, non -plastic, red -brown mottles gleyed 9.0-9.5' = 0.6 in center 3/413/4 2.0 As above, with 0.1' layers of saturated fine sand 0.4 15 - 1T 1/1/112 2.0 Gray clay, some silt, wet, soft, very sticky/plastic 0.2 GENERALIZED GEOLOGIC LOG and OTHER OBSERVATIONS 0 - 0.5' grass/topsoil - fine sandy loam 0.5 - 7.0' fine sandy loam 7.0 - 12.0' olive -brown silt, mottled, moist, wet in fine sand layers 12.0 - 17.0' gray clay, saturated NOTES: * Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac MicroTIP HL-2000 BGS - Below Ground Surface, BTOC - Below Top of Casing, f - fine, m - medium, c - coarse 0feet Name: S.B. Collms/Shelbume Mobil North... WELL CONSTRUCTION 977 Shelburne Ave, South 13 ti gton, VT Total Depth Drilled: - 14' BGS roject Number: 04-06 Screen Type/Interval: 2" PVC, 10-slot from 4.0 to 14.0' BGS ,filler: Tri-State Drilling & Boring/Neal Faulkner Sandpack Type/Interval: c sand, 2.75 to 14' BGS ,ling Method: 4.25" ID HSA Riser Type/Interval: 2" PVC from 04 BGS eulogist: J. Hoffer Seal TypeJnterval: Benseal granular bentonite, 1 - 2.75' BGS piing Method: 2" split spoon Measuring Point/Stickup: top of PVC Casing, -0.60' BGS ,ate/rime Started: 11/11/93, 1430. - Water Level/Date/Time: 11/18/93, 0800, 5.93' BTOC iate/Time Completed: 11/11/93, 1600 Elevation of Top of PVC: 11106mlative to on -site benchmark ;leather. 40 degrees, overcast, windy Well Development: Bailer Mace Conditions: avement (tank backfill) jplit-Spoon n,- Depth (feet) Sample Blows (per6") Sample Recovery (feet) Sample Description (color, texture, etc.) - PID* Reading (ppm) u' 5 - 7' t, 3/3/2/1 1.5 Yellowish brown f/m sand, Ioose, some fine gravel, 5-6' = 866 wet in last 2", strong gasoline odor 6.5-7'= >2500 P,7.5 - 9.5 4/3/1/1 1.5 As above, saturated 327 10 -12' 4/6/0/0 0.0 13 -15' 1/1/2w2 2.0 1.0' As above 67.3 1.0' - gray clay, with some silt, soft 0.3 0 - 0.5' pavement 0.5 - 14' fill - yellowish brown fhm sand, wet below 7' 14 - 15' gray clay, wet cuttings contained for disposal Headspace Reading, Photovac MicroTIP HL-2000 Below Ground Surface, BTOC - Below Top of Casing, f - fine, m - medium, c - coarse SOIL BORING/MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Project Name:: S.B. Collins/Shelbwne Mobil North ' :,'.. W ELUCONSTRUCTION , . site: 977 Shelburne Ave, South Barlington, Vr •::.' Total Depth Drilled: 15' BGS .. ' Project Number. 04-06 : - Screen Type/Intervah 2" PVC,10-slot. from 5.0 to 15.0' BGS Driller. Tri-State Drilling & Boring/Neal Faulkner Sandpack Type/Interval: c sand, 3.5 -15' BGS Drilling Method: 4.25" ID HSA Riser Type/Interval: 2" PVC from 0-5' BGS Geologist: f. Hoffer Seal Type,/Interval: Benseal granular bentonite, 1- 3.5' BGS Sampling Method: 2" split spoon Measuring Point/Stickup: top of PVC Casing, -0.20' BGS DateiTime Started: 11/11/93, 1300 Water Level/DateiTirne: 11/18/93, 0800, 6.52' BTOC Date/Time Completed: 11/11/93, 1430 Elevation of Top of PVC: � relative to on -site benchmark Weather. 40 degrees, overcast, windy Well Development: Bailer Surface Conditions: pavement, Toff curb Split -Spoon Sample Sample PIDx Depth Blows Recovery Sample Description (color, texture, etc.) Reading (feet) (per 6") (feet) (ppm) 5 - 7' 1/1/l/3 1.8 0.9' - gray brown fine sandy loam 1.6 0.5' - dark grayish brown fine sand with silt 1.6 0.4' yellowish brown m/c sand, with red -brown 2.6 mottling, moist 7.5 - 9.5 3/3/3/3 2.0 Olive -brown silt with some (Q0%) fine sand, 7.5-8.0' := 5.1 two 0.1' layers of fine sand (wet), red -brown mottles 9.0-9.5' = 5.8 throughout 10 - 12' 2/2/314 2.0 0.5', brown fine sand with silt, saturated 2.6 1.5' - olive brown silt, some fine sand, moist, 4.5 red -brown mottles gleyed in center, 13 - 15 2.0 Gray clay, some silt, wet, soft, very sticky/plastic 13-13.5 =1.7 14.5-15.0'=0.7 GENERALIZED GEOLOGIC LOG and OTHER OBSERVATIONS 0 - 0.5' pavement/sub-base 0.5 - 7.5' fine sandy loam 7.5 - 13.0' silt, moist, some wet fine sand 13.0 - 15' gray clay, saturated LOU, * Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac MicroTIP 14Ir2000 BGS - Below Ground Surface, BTOC - Below Top of Casing, f - fine, m - medium, c - coarse Ny- Project Name: ,S.R. Collins/Shelbame Mobil North WELL CONSTRUCTION Site: 977 Shelbame Ave, South Bmiington, VT Total Depth Drilled: 15' BGS ' Project Number. 04-06 Screen Type/Interval: 2" PVC, 10-slot from 4.75 to 14.75' BGS Driller. Tri-State Drilling & Boring/Neal Faulkner Sandpack Type/Interval: c sand, 3.25 -15' BGS Drilling Method: 4.25" ID HSA Riser Type/Interval: 2" PVC from 0-4.75' BGS Geologist: J. Hoffer Seal Type/Interval: Benseal granular bentoaite, 1- 3.25' BGS Sampling Method: 2" split spoon Measuring Point/Stickup: top of PVC Casing, -0.20' BGS Date/Time Started: 11/11193, 1Q30 Water Level/Date/1'ime: 11/18/93, 0800, 6.49' BTOC Date/Time Completed: 11/11J93, 1200 Elevation of Top of PVC: 4Wr&lative to on -site benchmark Weather. 40 degrees, overcast, windy Well Development: Bailer Surface Conditions: grass Split -Spoon Sample Sample PID* Depth Blows Recovery Sample Description (color, texture, etc.) Reading (feet) (per 611) (feet) (ppm) 5 - 7' refusal 7.5 - 9.5' 3141414 10 1.0' - gray fine sandy Ioam, mottled, moist 7.5-8.0' =1.3 1.0' - gray brown silt loam, moist, mottled 9.0-9.5' = 1.5 10 -12' 5/5/4/3 2.0 Olive brown silt, moist, some fine sand (wet) 10-10.5' = 2.8 red -brown mottles in top 1.0' 11.5-12.0'=3.9 13 -15'. 2.0 1 Gray clay, some silt, wet, soft 0.3 GENERALIZED GEOLOGIC LOG and OTHER OBSERVATIONS 0 - 0.5' grass/topsoil - fine sandy loam 0.5 - 7.0' fill - sandy loam, concrete fragments 7.0 - 8.5' fine sandy loam 8.5 -13' silt loam and silt, moist, wet in fine sand layers 13 - 15' gray clay, soft, wet NOTFSa * Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac MicroTIP M -2000 BGS - Below Ground Surface BTOC - Below To of Casing, f - fine, m - medium, c - coarse zz: P g Project Name ,' S B Collins/Shelbume Mobil North :: WELL CON.STRUCTJON Sitei 977 Shelbume Ave, South Burtin&n, V r Total Depth Drilled: 14' BGS Project Number 04-06 Screen Type/Interval: 2" PVC, 10-slot from 4.0 to 14.0' Driller :Tri-State Drilling &'Boring/Neal Faulkner Sandpack Type/Intervah c sand, 3.0 to 14.0' BGS Drilling Method: 4.25" ID HSA Riser Type/Interval: 2" PVC from 04 BGS Geologist: J. Hoffer Seal Type/Interval: Benseal granular bentonite, 1 - 3.0' BGS Sampling Method: 2" split spoon Measuring Point/Stickup: top of PVC Casing, -0.65' BGS Date/Time Started: 11/11/93, 1600 Water Level/Date r me: 11/18/93, 0800, 6.03' BTOC Date/Time Completed: 11/11193, 1800 Elevation of Top of PVC: � relative to on -site benchmark Weather. 40 degrees, overcast, windy Well Development: Bailer Surface Conditions: pavement Split -Spoon Sample Sample PI Depth Blows Recovery Sample Description (color, texture, etc.) Reading (feet) (per 6") (feet) (PPm) 8 -10, 4/2/4/4 1.6 Olive -brown silty fine sand, wet, 9.5-10' = 3.0 , red -brown mottles with gleyed centers 11- 13' 1/l/1/0 1 2.0 1 Gray clay with some silt, wet, soft" 0•2 GENERALIZED GEOLOGIC LOG and OTHER OBSERVATIONS 0 - 0.5' pavemeat/sub-base 0.5 - 8.0' brown f/m sandy loam 8.0 - I V silty fine sand 11- 14' gray clay, saturated NOTES: * Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac MicroTIP HL-2000 BGS - Below Ground Surface, BTOC - Below Top of Casing, f - fine, m - medium, c - coarse SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Well Boring ID: MW-6 Project Name: S. B. Collins/Shelburne Road North Site: Mobil Short Stop North Project Number: 04-06 Driller: Adams Engineering Drilling Method: 2 3/8" Hollow Barrel Sampler Geologist: T. Schmalz Sampling Method: 2 3/8" Hollow Barrel Sampler Date/Time Started: 4/4/95, 1315 Date/Time Completed: 4/4/95, 1410 Weather: Cool, rainy, 45' Surface Conditions: Level asphalt Well Construction Total Depth Drilled: 8.6' BGS Screen Type/Interval: 1.5" PVC #10 slot, 7.5' to 2.5' BGS Sandpack Type/Interval: 0.49 mm pool filter sand, 7.5' to 1.4' BGS Riser Type/Interval: 1.5" PVC, 2.5' to 0.0' BGS Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite slurry, 1.4' to 0.6' BGS Measuring Point/Stickup: Top of PVC casing, flush mount Water Level/Date/Time: 2.13', 4/6/95, 1053 Elevation of Top of PVC: ~, 3.75 gallons Well Development: I Peristaltic pump Sample Run Recovery PID Depth (feet) Sample Description* Reading** (feet) ( m) 0.0 - 1.0. NA 1.0 Augered through asphalt and underbed material (dry, coarse angular gravel and NA sandy clay loam). .1.0 - 4.8 (3.6) 2.0 Brown with red and gray, slightly moist, firm, fine sandy loam. 0.9 1.6 same, becoming sandy clay loam. 0.5 . 4.8 - 9.8 . (3.8) 1.7 same (as above). 0.6 2.1 Dark gray, slightly moist, firm, silty clay, sticky, slightly plastic, 0.6 trace very fine sand). Generalized Geologic Log and Other Observations 0.0 - 6.5 Lacustrine/marine, brown, fine sands and.silty sands. 6.5 - 8.6 Lacustrine dark gray silts and clays. Saturation at 5.0' (approximately). Notes: * = USDA/SCS Soil Classification Scheme ** = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac MircoTIP HL-2000, calibrated to isobutylene BGS = Below Ground Surface, BTOC = Below Top of Casing, f = fine, m = medium, c = coarse SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Well Boring ID: MW-7 Project Name: S. B. Collins/Shelburne Road North .Site: Mobil Short Stop North Project Number: 04-06 Driller: Adams Engineering Drilling Method: 2 3/8" Hollow Barrel Sampler Geologist: T. Schmalz Sampling Method: 2 3/8" Hollow Barrel Sampler Date/Time Started: 4/4/95, 0920 Date/Time Completed:, 4/4/95, 1000 Weather: Cool, rainy, 45' Surface Conditions: Level asphalt Well Construction Total Depth Drilled: 10.0' BGS Screen Type/Interval: 1.5" PVC #10 slot, 7.5' to 2.5' BGS Sandpack Type/Interval: 0.49 mm pool filter sand, 7.5' to 1.5' BGS Riser Type/Interval: 1.5" PVC, 2.5' to 0.0' BGS Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite slurry, 1.5' to 0.5' BGS Measuring Point/Stickup: Top of PVC casing, flush mount Water Level/Date/Time: 1.13', 4/6/96, 1056 Elevation of Top of PVC: Kjolbly3.75 gallons Peristaltic pump Well Development: Sample Run Recovery PID Depth (feet) Sample Description* Reading** (feet) ( m) 0.0 - 1.5 NA 1.0 Augered through asphalt and underbed material (dry, coarse angular gravel and NA sandy clay loam). 1.5 - 5.0 (3.5) 1.4 Dark gray, slightly moist sandy loam, fine sand. 0.1 2.1 Becoming increasingly silty/clayey, to sandy clay loam. 0.6 5.0 - 10.0 (4.0) 2.0 Dark gray, slightly moist silty clay, trace very fine sand, slightly sticky, 0.5 slightly lastic. 2.0 Same (as above), becoming saturated, softer. 1.0 Generalized Geologic LoQ and Other Observations 0.0 - 5.0 Lacustrine/marine, brown, fine silty sands. 5.0 - 10.0 Lacustrine dark gray stiff silts and clays., Saturation at 6.0' (approximately). Notes: * = USDA/SCS Soil Classification Scheme ** = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac MircoTIP HL-2000, calibrated to isobutylene BGS = Below Ground Surface, BTOC = Below Top of Casing, f = fine, in = medium, c = coarse SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Well Boring ID: MW-8 Project Name: S. B. Collins/Shelburne Road North . Site: Mobil Short Stop North Project Number: 04-06 Driller: Adams Engineering Drilling Method: 2 3/8" Hollow Barrel Sampler Geologist: T. Schmalz Sampling Method: 2 3/8" Hollow Barrel Sampler Date/Time Started: 4/4/95, 0755 Date/Time Completed: 4/4/95, 0835 Weather: Cool, rainy, 45' Surface Conditions: Level asphalt Well Construction Total Depth Drilled: 9.8' BGS Screen Type/Interval: 1.5" PVC # 10 slot, 7.5' to 2.5' BGS Sandpack Type/Interval: 0.49 mm pool filter sand, 7.5' to 1.5' BGS Riser Type/Interval: 1.5" PVC, 2.5' to 0.0' BGS Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite slurry, 1.5' to 0.5' BGS Measuring Point/Stickup: Top of PVC casing, flush mount Water Level/Date/Time: 1.19', 4/6/95, 1103 Elevation of Top of PVC: Owl 1.25 gallons Well Development: I Peristalic pump Sample Run Depth (feet) Recovery (feet) Sample Description* PID Reading** ( m) 0.0 - 1.5 NA 1.0 Augered through asphalt and underbed material (dry, coarse angular gravel and sandy clay loam). NA 1.5 - 5.0 (3.4) 0.6 Brown, moist, gravelly sandy clay -loam, fine to medium rounded gravel. 1.2 1.1 Brown -gray, moist, firm silty clay. 0.5 1.7 Light gray, moist, very firm silty clay, medium dilatency, slightly sticky. 0.4 5.0 - 9.8 4.2) 4.2 Same (as above). 0.0 Generalized Geologic Loa and Other Observations 0.0 - 3.2 Lacustrine/marine brown sandy silts and clays. Saturation at 3.0' (approximately). 3.2 - 9.8 Lacustrine gray silts and clays. '+ ` Notes: * = USDA/SCS Soil Classification Scheme ** = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac MircoTIP HL-2000, calibrated to isobutylene BGS = Below Ground Surface, BTOC = Below Top of Casing, f = fine, m = medium, c = coarse SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Well Boring ID: MW-9 Project Name: S. B. Collins/Shelburne Road North Site: Mobil Short Stop North Project Number: 04-06 Driller: Adams Engineering Drilling Method: 2 3/8" Hollow Barrel Sampler Geologist: T. Schmalz Sampling Method: 2 3/8" Hollow Barrel Sampler Date/Time Started, 4/4/95, 1105. .. Date/Time Com leted: 4/4/95, 1140 Weather: Cool, rainy, 45' Surface Conditions: Level asphalt Well Construction Total Depth Drilled: 9.8' BGS Screen Type/Interval: 1.5" PVC 410 slot, 7.0' to 2.0' BGS Sandpack Type/Interval: 0.49 mm pool filter sand, 7.0' to 1.2' BGS Riser Type/Interval: 1.5" PVC, 2.0' to 0.0' BGS Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite slurry, 1.2' to 0.5' BGS - Measuring Point/Stickup: Top of PVC casing, flush mount Water Level/Date/Time: 1.03', 4/6/95, 1059 Elevation of Top of PVC: 3.0 gallons . Well Development:�Meristalic pump Sample Run Depth (feet) Recovery (feet) Sample Description* PID Reading** (pm) 0.0 - 4.5 NA 1.0 Augered through asphalt and underbed material (dry, coarse angular gravel and sandy clay loam). NA 1.5 - 5.0 (3.5) 2.8 Gray, slightly moist, firm sandy clay loam,brown mottling. 0.3 0.7 Gray, slightly moist, firm clay loam, some very fine sand. 0.4 5.0 - 9.8 (3.8) 3.8 Gray, moist, firm silty clay, plastic, slightly sticky, moderate dilatency. 0.2 Generalized Geologic Lot and Other Observations 0.0 - 4.3 Lacustrine/marine gray and brown silty fine sands. Saturation at 3.0' (approximately). 3.2 - 9.8 Lacustrine gray silt and clay, stiff. Notes• * = USDA/SCS Soil Classification Scheme ** = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac MircoTIP HL-2000, calibrated to isobutylene BGS = Below Ground Surface, BTOC = Below Top of Casing, f = fine, in = medium, c = coarse - ,; : _. r�F d . r. SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Client / Site:IS B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North Location: I Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT. Driller: Ger Adams - Adams En ineerin ..X.. .... .........................: ................ ...... .................. .. ig Method: 2 3/8" Sampler (vibratory) ................................................ Geologist: Tim Schmalz ............................................................................................ ig Method: continuous samples Date: 5/15/98 ............................................................................................. Weather: Warm (65 to 70.degrees) sunny, t ............................................................................................ Location: N side of building, towards rear of WELL BORING ID: MW-10 Well Construction Information ............................................................................................................................................................ Total De....................th Drilled: 15.0' BGS .......................... ......... .... .... .... ......... ....... ........ ............ ........ ...... ......... ............ ..........................................................:.. Sreen Type/Inteal: 1.5"sch40, 10-slot PV12.5'-2.5BGS ...............ry .......... rv" ' ......................................6............ .. . . Sandpack Type/Interval: #1 sand 8 natural pack / 15.0' - 2.0' BGS .......................... _............... .............. ......................................................................................................................... . Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite slurry / 2.0' - 1.0' BGS ..................................................................................................................................................... Water Level/Date 6.1075.27.98 .................................................................................................................................................................................. Elevation Ground: 9tl�R.Mx:) ................................................ Elevation TOC: .......................................................:......................................................................... .......... ...................................... Other: developed with Adams' peristaltic pump Sample Total Driven / Recovered Approximate USDA PID Interval Recovery Interval Depth Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) Soil Reading* feet BGS (feet) feet feet BGS Texture ppm 0.0 - 5.0 5.0 / 2.7 1.0 0.0 - 1.0 Gray and brown sandy gravel fill, slightly moist, loose (60% m. gravelly sandy loam 0.0 angular gravel, 30% fine to coarse sand, 10% silt and clay). 1.7 1.0 - 2.7 Brown, soft, slightly moist sand (90% loose fine sand, 10% silt sand 0.7 and clay), (fill). 5.0 - 10.0 5.013.5 2.0 5.0 - 7.0 Brown, soft, moist to wet silty sand, product staining and f. loamy sand 1874.0 product present (75% f to m sand, 25% silt and clay). 1.5 7.0 - 8.5 Gray, with brown mottling, stiff, moist to wet sandy slit (70% silt silt loam 1129.0 and clay, 30% very fine sand). 10.0 - 15.0 5.0 / 3.0 3.0 10.0 - 13.0 Same (as above), becoming siltier with depth (to 85-90% silt). silt loam to silt 583.0 Generalized Geologic Log and Other Observations: Chiseled through pavement and base to 0.5' BGS (approx.) 0.5' - 5.0': Fill, consisting of sandy angular gravel (sub -base for asphalt) and fine silty sand. 5.0' - 8.5': Lacustrine/marine silty sand. 8.5' - 13.0': Lacustrine silt and clay, very stiff. ,Note * = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North .................................................................................................................................................... Location: Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT. ..................................................................................................................... Project Number: 04-06 ........................................................................................................................................... Driller: GerryAdams - Adams Engineering ........................................................................................ Drilling ..Method:.......2..3/8.." ..Sampler........(.vibratory.................................................................................................. Geologist: Tim Schmalz .................................................................................."................................................................ Sampling Method: continuous samples .................................................................................................................................................... Date: 5/15/98 ................................................................................................................................................... Weather: Warm (65 to 70 degrees) sunny, breezy Boren Location: Behind building in sidewalk, next to vent point WELL BORING ID: MW-11 Well Construction Information ...................................................................................................................................................................................: Total Depth Drilled: 13.0' BGS ................................................................................................................................................................................... Screen Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 12.5' - 2.5' BGS ................................................................................................................................................................................... Riser Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40 PVC / 2.5' - 0.3' BGS ............. ".......................................... ......... ................................................................ ".............................................. . Sandpack Type/Interval: #1 sand & natural pack / 13.0' - 2.0' BGS .................................................................................................................................................................................... Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite powder / 2.0' - 1.0' BGS ...................................................... .... ........... ....... "........................................................... ..................................... Water Level/Date 6.6075.27.98 .......................................................... .................................................. »...................................................................... Elevation Ground: 1w) .................... ......................................................................_-............................................ Elevation TOC: ................................................................................................................................................ Other: developed with Adams' peristaltic pump Sample Total Driven / Recovered Approximate USDA PID Interval Recovery Interval Depth Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) Soil Reading" feet BGS feet feet feet BGS) Texture (ppm) 0.0 - 5.0 Hand augered through medium angular gravel (top 1.5') fill into gravelly sandy loam nm silty medium sand (also fill) to 4.5' BGS. 5.0 - 10.0 5.0 / 2.0 1.0 5.0 - 6.0 Brown, soft/loose, slightly moist medium sand fill (95% sand, 5% sand 14.6 silt and clay). 1.0 6.0 - 7.0 Brown, loose, wet coarse sand (60% m to c sand, 20% fine ang. gravelly sandy loam 1894.0 gravel, 20% silt and clay), product saturated. 10.0 - 15.0 3.0 / nr nr nr Mainly gravel in spoon (from 1.0-4.0 foot interval), minor amounts sand 416.0 of dark brown wet silty sand in base of spoon. Generalized Geologic Log and Other Observations: Hand augered (to avoid conduit) to 4.5 to 5.0 feet BGS through silty gravel fill. 5.0' - 13.0': Lacustrine silty sands and gravels, product saturated at 7', possibly fill? Notes: = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled V SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North ................................................................................................................................................... Location: Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT. .. ................................................................................................................................................. Project Number: 04-06 ................................................................................................................................................... Driller: Ger Adams - Adams En ineerin 7........................................@..............9...............I............... Drilling Method: 2 3/8" Sampler (vibratory) .......................................................................................................................... Geologist: Tim Schmalz ......................................................................... . .......................... Sampling Method: continuous samples ................................................................................................................................................... Date: 5/15/98 ................................................................................................................................................... Weather: Warm (65 to 70 degrees) sunny, breezy ..................................................................................................... Bonin Location: S side of Building, towards rear of bldg. WELL BORING ID: MW-12 Well Construction Information ................................................................................................................................................................................... Total Depth Drilled: 15.0' BGS ................................................................................................................................................................................... Screen Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 12.6' - 2.6' BGS ................................................. ..... ................ .................. ............................................... ............................ I............... Riser Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40 PVC / 2.6' - 0.3' BGS ................................................................................................................................................................................... Sandpack Type/Interval: #1 sand & natural pack / 15.0' - 1.7' BGS .................................................................................................................................................................................. Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite powder / 1.7'- 0.8' BGS ................................................................................................................................................................................... Water Level/Date 5.8475,27.98 .............................................................................................................................................................................. Elevation Ground:om ................................................................................................................................................................................... Elevation TOCIOMM .................................................................................................................................. Other: developed with Adams' peristaltic pump Sample Total Driven ! Recovered Approximate USDA PID Interval Recovery Interval Depth Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) Soil Reading" feet BGS (feet) (feet) feet BGS Texture ppm 0.0 - 5.0 5.0 / 3.0 1.0 0.5 - 1.5 Light gray, loose, slightly moist angular gravel and silty sand fill gravelly sandy loam nm (65% m. angular gravel, 25% medium sand, 10% silt and clay). 2.0 1.5 - 3.5 Brown, soft, slightly moist sand fill (95% medium sand, 5% silt). sand 1.7 5.0 - 10.0 5.0 / 3.2 1.5 5.0 - 6.5 Brown, soft, moist gravelly sand (60% medium sand, 30% sub- gravelly loamy sand 2000+ rounded medium gravel, 10% silt and clay). 1.7 6.5 - 8.2 Gray, stiff, slightly moist silt and clay (100% silt and clay). silt 200.0 10.0 - 15.0 5.0 / 4.5 4.5 10.0 - 14.5 Same (as above), trace fine sand. silt 276.0 Generalized Geologic Log and Other Observations: Chiseled through asphalt and base to 0.5' BGS. 0.5' - 1.5': parking lot base -angular gravel and silty sand. 1.5' - 6.5': Loose sand fill, wet, product saturated from 5.0 to 6.5'. 6.5'- 14.5': Lacustrine/marine silty clay with trace fine sand. Notes: t = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled .V i SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North .......... ............................ ..... ........................................................................................................ : Location: Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT. ................................................................................................................................................... Project Number: 04-06 .................................................................................................................................................... Driller: GerryAdams - Adams Engineering ...................................................................................... Drilling Method: 2 3/8" Sampler (vibratory) ......................................................................................................................... Geologist: Tim Schmalz ........................................................................................................................................... Sampling Method: continuous samples ................................................................................................................................................... -Date: 5/15/98 .......................................................................................................................... Weather: Warm (65 to 70 degrees) sunny, breezy ............................................................................ Borin Location: In grass between store and B. King. WELL BORING ID: MW-13 Well Construction Information ................................................................................................................................................................................... Total Depth Drilled: 14.0' BGS .............................................................................................................................. Screen Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 12.0' - 2.0' BGS ................................................................................................................................................................................... Riser Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40 PVC / 2.0'- 0.3' BGS ................................................................................................... Sandpack Type/Interval: #1 sand & natural pack / 14.0' - 1.5' BGS ......................................................... ............................................................................... ................... I ...................... . Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite powder / 1.5'- 0.5' BGS ................................................................................................................................................................................... Water Level/Date 5.6275.27.98 ................................................................................................................................................................................... Elevation Ground:Oftill* .roun.................In ......................................................................................................... Elevation TOC: ................................................................................................................................................................................... Other: developed with Adams' peristaltic pump Sample Total Driven / Recovered Approximate USDA PID Interval Recovery Interval Depth Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) Soil Reading* feet BGS feet (feet) (feet BGS) Texture ppm 0.0 - 4.0 4.0 / 2.2 2.2 0.0 - 2.2 Dark brown, soft, loose, slightly moist topsoil fill (25% ang. m. gravelly silt loam 0.1 gravel, 20% fine sand, 55% silt and clay). 5.0 - 10.0 5.0 / 3.0 1.0 5.0 - 6.0 Brown, wet, loose sand (100% m. sand). sand 0.0 2.0 6.0 - 8.0 Gray with brown mottling, slightly moist, stiff/tough silt (80% silt silt loam 0.0 and clay, 20% v. fine sand). 10.0 - 15.0 3.5 / 1.5 1.5 10.0 - 11.5 Same (as above). silt loam 0.0 Generalized Geologic Loci and Other Observations: 0.0'- 2.5': Topsoil fill -landscaped area. 2.5' - 6.0': Loose brown fill, silt loam and sand fill beneath topsoil. 6.0' - 11.5': Lacustrine/marine silt and clay, trace fine sand. Notes: = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, INS = not sampled 'V i x � .. # aJ' . q .. "A:,t u �1 . „�.,''t � � � � e+s-�... � aa�`. 'c.�,�5.t.w"?�sy,: �� �'+A�y`,5�+... T-`�!l±.�;. .,, ," ` °"�t�r r�:wv •� •. SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North ............................................................................ Location: Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT: .............................................................................................................................................. Project Number: 04-06 ................................................................................................................................................... Driller: Gerry Adams - Adams Engineering ................................................................................................................................................... Drilling Method: 2 3/8" Sampler (vibratory) .................................................................................................................................................... Geologist: Tim Schmalz .................................................................................................................................... Sampling Method: continuous samples ................................................................................................................................................ ............................... Date. 5/21 /98 ........................................................................................ Weather: Cool, (60 degrees), breezy, p. cloudy. ................................................................................................................................................... Bonin Location: In grass area adjacent to pay phones. WELL BORING ID: MW-14 Well Construction Information .................................................................................................................................................................................. Total Depth Drilled: 12.5' BGS ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Screen Type/Interval: 1.5' sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 12.0' - 2.0' BGS, 2' sleeve from 3' ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Riser Type/Interval: 2" sleeve over screen, 3.0' - 0.3' BGS ...................................................................................................................................................................................... S a n d p a c k Type/Interval: #1 sand & natural pack / 12.5' - 2.0BGS ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite slurry / 2.0' - 1.0' BGS ............................................................................................................................................................................... Water Level/Date 5.62'/5.27.98 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Elevation Ground:Ir ............................!....................................................................................:..... Elevation TOC: ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Other: developed with Adams' peristaltic pump Sample Total Driven / Recovered Approximate USDA PID Interval Recovery Interval Depth Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) Soil Reading* (feet BGS) (feet) (feet) feet BGS) Texture (ppm) 0.0 - 5.0 5.0 / 2.2 2.0 0.0 - 2.2 Brown, loose, slightly moist sllty sand (60% v.f. to m. sand, 40% sandy loam 0.0 sllt and clay). 5.0 - 10.0 5.0 / 3.0 3.0 5.0 - 8.0 Same, wet from 5.2' BGS, becoming fine sand only below 7.0' sandy loam 0.0 10.0 - 15.0 2.0 / 1.5 1.5 1 10.0 - 11.5 Isame (as above), refusal at 12.5' sandy loam 0.0 Generalized Geologic Lou and Other Observations: 0.0'- 5.5': Fill, brown loose silty sand. 5.5' - 11.5% Grading into lacustrine silt and sand, refusal at 12.5' BGS. Notes: * = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North ................................................................................................................................................... Location: Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT. ................1..........................................................................................................I...................... Project Number: 04-06 ................................................................................................................................................... Driller: GerryAdams - Adams Engineering ..................................................................................... Drilling Method: 2 3/8" Sampler (vibratory ........................................................................) ................................................. Geologist: Tim Schmalz ................................................................................................................................................... Sampling Method: continuous samples ................................................................................................................................................... Date: 5121 /98 .................................................................................................................................................. Weather Cool: (60 degrees), breezy, p. cloudy. ......................................................................................... Bon Location: South end of island to front of property. Well Construction Information .................... .......................................................................................................... Total De..............th Drilled: 14.0' BGS .......................................................................................................................................................... Screen Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 12.3' - 2.3' BGS ...............................................................................,,.....................,............................................ Riser Type/Interval: e/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40 PVC / 2.3' - 0.3' BGS ............................................................................................................................ Sandpack Type/Interval: #1 sand & natural pack / 12.3 - 1.1' BGS ................................................................................................................................................. Seal Type/interval: Bentonite powder / 1.1' - 0.5' BGS ........................................................................................................................................................... Water Level/Date 5.6275.27.98 .......................................................................................................................................................... Elevation Ground: jll1� ................................................................................................................ Elevation TOC: Otherl.developed with Adams Sample Interval feet BGS Total Driven / Recovery (feet) Recovered Interval feet Approximate Depth feet BGS Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) USDA Soil Texture PID Reading' ppm 0.0 - 5.0 5.0 / 3.0 1.5 0.0-1.5 Dark brown, soft, slightly moist topsoil fill (65% of sand, 35% silt and clay). sandy loam 1.2 1.5 1.5 - 3.0 Same, grading into stiff gray clay (fill), slightly moist, firm. silty clay nm 4.0 - 9.0 5.0 / 3.0 1.5 4.0 - 5.5 Brown to gray, wet, slightly to very stiff silty sand (70% sand, 30% silt and clay). silty clay 31.1 1.5 5.5 - 7.0 Same (as above). silty clay 0.0 9.0 - 14.0 5.0 / 4.0 0.5 9.0 - 9.5 Brown to dark gray, loose, wet medium sand (100% sand). sand 902.0 3.5 9.5 - 13.0 Gray, wet, stiff silt and clay (100% silt and clay). slit loam 11.8 Generalized Geologic Lou and Other Observations: 0.0' - 1.5': Topsoil fill, brown soft silt and sand. 1.5'- 95: Brown and gray fill grading into loose sand and silt, contaminated. 9.0' - 13.0': Gray lacustrine silt and clay, stiff. Notes: = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled All SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North ................................................................................................................................................. Location: Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT. ............................................................................................................................................... ProjectNumber. 04.-06................................................................................................ Driller Gerry Adams - Adams Engineering ................................................................................. Drilling Method: 2 3/8" Sampler (vibratory) ................................................................................................................................................ Geologist: Tim Schmalz ............................................................................................................................................... Sampling Method: continuous samples ................................................................................................................................................. .............................. Date: 5/21/98..............................I. ...................................................... Weather: Cool: (60 degrees), breezy, p. cloudy. ion-........ .'--i........................................................ Boring Location: In island east of MW-1 WELL BORING ID: MW-16 Well Construction Information ............................................................................................................................................................................... Total Depth Drilled: 14.0' BGS ............................................................................................................................................................................. Screen Type/Interval: 1:5" sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 12.5' - 2.5' BGS ....................................................................................................................................................................................... Riser Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40 PVC / 2,5' - 0.3' BGS ............................................................................................................................................................ Sandpack Type/Interval: #1 sand & natural pack / 14.0'- 1.7' BGS ...................................................................................................... . .................... Seal Type/Interval: Bentonit e powder / 1.7' - 0.5' BGS ........................................................................................................................................................................... Water Levet/Date 5.6275.27.98 ....................................................................................................................................................................................... Elevation Ground. . ..: MII ............................................ ......................... ........................ ........................................ Elevation TOC: 811111110 ...................................................................................................................................................... Other: developed with Adams' peristaltic pump Sample Interval feet BGS) Total Driven / Recovery (feet) Recovered Interval (feet) Approximate Depth (feet BGS) I Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) USDA Soil Texture PID Reading* (ppm) 0.0 - 5.0 na na na Hand augered through brown soft slightly moist silty sand to 4/ 4.5 feet BGS to avoid utilities. sandy loam 0.0 5.0 - 10.0 5.0 / 3.0 1.5 5.0 - 6.5 Brown, wet, loose medium sand (100 % sand). sand 0.0 1.5 6.5 - 8.0 Gray, wet, stiff silt with fine sand (75% silt and clay, 25% fine sand). silt loam 0.0 10.0 - 15.0 _5.014.0 4.0 10.0 - 14.0 Gray, wet, stiff clay. clay 0.1 Generalized Geoloaic Log and Other Observations: Hand augered through silty sand to 4.0', through silt to 4.5', all fill. 4.5'- 6.5': Brown loose fill. 6.5' - 14.0': Lacustrine/marine gray silt and clay, trace fine sand. Notes: ' = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled .Vi Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North ..............:................................................ ....... .............. ................................................................. -Location: Shelburne Rd., So: Burlington VT. .................................................................. Project Number_ 04 :06 ...................................................................................... Driller Gerry Adams -Adams En�ineerinq ............................ .............. in�.Method:..2 3/8" Sampler (,vibratory)....................................I. ........ .......................... ........... Geologist: Tim Schmalz ........................................................................................................................................... Sampling Method: continuous samples ...................................................................................................................................... Date: 5/21/98 .................-.............................................-.................................................................................. Weather: Cool, (60 degrees), breezy, P:.cloudy. Boring Location' In island next to sidewalk, south end. Well Construction Information ......................................................... ................... _.......... _.._..................................................... Total Depth Drilled: 13.0' BGS .......................................................................__...............................-................ Screen Type/Interval: 1; 5" sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 12.5' -•2.5' BGS .................................................................................. Riser.Type/Interval 1 5" sch. 40 PVC / 2.5' - 0.5' BGS ............................................................................................................. Sandpack Type/Interval: #1 sand & natural pack / 13.0' 1.6' BGS ..................................................................................................................................... Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite powder / 1.6' - 0.5' BGS ................................................................................................................................................... Water Level/Date 5.6275.27.98 .._............................................................................................................................................... Elevation Ground: ............................... ...... ...... ............................................................ _............... Elevation TOC: ......................................................._ I .......................................................................................... Other. developed with Adams' peristaltic pump Sample Interval feet BGS Total Driven / Recovery feet Recovered Interval feet Approximate Depth feet BGS Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) USDA.:. Soil Texture PID Reading" ppm 0.0 - 5.0 na na na Hand augered through brown, loose coarse angular gravel and silty sand to T BGS (all fill). gravelly silt loam 0.0 5.0 - 10.0 5.0 / 1.5 0.5 5.0 - 5.5 Brown, loose, moist silty sand (fill). silt loam 0.0 1.0 5.5 - 6.5 Gray, stiff, wet silt and clay, trace fine sand. silty clay 0.0 10.0 - 15.0 3.0 / 3.0 3.0 10.0 - 13.0 Same (as above). silty clay 0.0 Generalized Geologic Log and Other Observations: Hand augered through brwon coarse angular gravel and silty sand to 5.0' BGS, fill. 5.0' - 5.5': Brown, loose fill. 5.5' - 13.0': Gray lacustrine/marine silt and clay, tough. Motes: " = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled Page 8 SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North ......................................................................................................................... Location: Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT. ................................................................................................................................................... Project Number: 04-06 ................................................................................................................................................... Driller: Gerry Adams - Adams Engineering .............................................. .... .... .... ............ Drilling Method: 2 3/8" Sampler (vibratory) ................................................................................................................................................... Geologist: Tim Schmalz ................................................................................................................................................... Sampling Method: continuous samples ................................................................................................................................................... Date: 9128/98 ................................................................................................................................................... Weather Cool, (60 degrees), breezy, p. cloudy. ..........................................:........................................................................................................ Bonin Location South of dumpster pad, behind bidg. WELL BORING ID: MW-18 Well Construction Information ........................................................................................................................................................................:........... Total Depth Drilled: 15' BGS .................................................................................................................................................................................... Screen Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 12.5' - 2.5' BGS ......................................................................................................................................................... I........................... Riser TyQe/Interval 1:5" sch. 40 PVC /........... BGS ....................................................................................................................... Sandpack Type/Interval: #1 sand & natural pack / 13.0' - 2.0' BGS .................................................................................................................................................................................... Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite powder / 2.0'- 0.5' BGS .................................................................................................................................................................................... Water Level/Date 6.94710.7.98 .................................................................................................................................................................................... Elevation Ground i &VA11111111POIllips) .................................................................................................................................................................................... Elevation TOC: .................................................................................................................................................. Other. developed with Adamsperistaltic pump Sample Total Driven / Recovered Approximate USDA PID Interval Recovery Interval Depth Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) - Soil Reading' (feet BGS) (feet) (feet) (feet BGS) Texture (p m) 0.0 - 5.0 5.0 / 2.0 2.0 0.0-2.0 Brown, moist, soft topsoil fill (10% angular fine gravel, 30% silt loam 0.0 . medium to coarse sand, 60% silt and clay). 5.0 - 10.0 5.0 / 2.8 1.0 5.0 - 6.0 Brown, moist, soft silt, trace gravel silt to silt loam 0.0 1.8 6.0 - 7.8 Gray and brown, firm, wet, sllty sand (65% m to f sand, 35% silt). sandy loam 0.0 10.0 - 15.0 5.0 / 4.0 4.0 10.0 - 14.0 Gray, wet, firm, fine sand, some brown mottling (85% fine sand, loamy sand 0.0 15% silt and clay). Generalized Geologic Log and Other Observations: 0.0'- 2.0': Brown topsoil fill. 2.0'- 6.0': Brown silt and sand fill. 6.0' - 14.0% Gray marine/lacustrine silts and sands. Notes: = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North ................................................................................................................................................. Location: Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT. ................................................................................................................................................. Project Number: 04-06 ..................................................................................................................... Driller GerryI. Adams - Adams Engineering ............................................................................................... Drilling Method: 2 3/8" Sampler (vibratory) ........... ................................................................................... Geologist: Tim Schmalz .. .................................... ............................................................................................................ Sampling Method: continuous samples ................................................................................................................................................ Date: 9/28/98 ..........................................................<.................................................................................... Weather Cool, (60 degrees): breezy, p. cloudy. .................................................................................................. Boris Location: Immed. south of gray storage bldg. behind store WELL BORING ID: MW-19 Well Construction Information ........................................................................................................................ I ............. .......... Total Depth Drilled: 15.0' BGS ...........................<...YP...................................................................................................,........ Screen T e/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 15.0'- 5.0' BGS ............................................................................................................................. Riser Type/Interval: 1:5" sch: 40 PVC 15.0'- 0.5' BGS .............................................................. Sandpack Type/Interval: #1 sand & natural pack / 15.0' - 3.5' BGS ........................................................ .................... ......................................... I.......................... Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite powder / 3.5'- 1.0' BGS Water LaveltData 6.31'/10.7.98 ................................................................................................................................................. Elevation Ground Elevation TOC:AloW ............................................................................................................... Other: developed with Adams' peristaltic pump Sample Total Driven / Recovered Approximate USDA PID Interval Recovery Interval Depth Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) Soil Reading* feet BGS) (feet) (feet) (feet BGS) Texture (ppm) 0.0 - 5,0 5.0 / 3.0 1.5 0.0 - 1.5 Brown, moist, soft topsoil fill (10% angular fine gravel, 30% silt loam 0.0 medium to coarse sand, 60% silt and clay). 1.5 1.5 - 3.0 Gray, moist silt and gravel fill, asphalt In spoon tip (50% gravel, gravelly silt loam 0.0 50% silt and clay). 5.0 - 10.0 5.0/3.5 3.5 5.0 - 8.5 Gray and brown, soft, moist silty sand (50% sand, 50% silt and loam to sandy loam 0.0 clay). 10.0 - 15.0 5.0 / 4.9 4.9 10.0 - 14.9 Gray, brown mottled, stiff, moist to wet silt (100% silt and clay). silty clay loam 0.0 Generalized Geologjc Lou and Other Observations: 0.0' - 1.5': Brown topsoil fill. 1.5' - 5.0': Gray silty gravel fill. 5.0' - 15.0': Marine/lacustrine silty sand. Motes: * = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled xd i rsz- a t w. , SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North .................................................................................................................................................. Location: Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT. Pro ect Number: 04-06 .................................................................................................................................................. Driller: Ge Adams - Adams En ineering ....-.................. I ................ ...... Y................................................ Drilling Method: 2 3/8' Sampler (vibratory) ........................................................................................................................... Geologist: Tim Schmalz .............. ................p....................... ............................................... Sampling Method: continuous samples ..............................................�ami(i�g Method Date: 9/28/98 ................................................................................................................................................... Weather: Cool: (60 degrees), breezy, p. cloudy. ........................................................................................................................................... Bori�Location: In grassy area west of building, 7's tree, 12'w tree WELL BORING ID: MW-20 Well Construction Information .............................................................................................................................................................. Total De th Drilled: 15.0' BGS Screen T /Interval: 1.5" sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 12.5' - 2.5' BGS ................................................................................................................................................................ Riser Type/Interval: 1; 5" sch: 40 PVC 12.5' - 0.5' BGS .................................................................................. Sandpack Type/Interval: #1 sand & natural pack / 13.0' - 1.5' BGS ................................................................................................................................................................ Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite powder / 1.5' - 0.5' BGS ...................................I..............,,.................................................. Water Level/Date 5.60710.7.98 ................................................................................................................................................................ Elevation Ground: ......... .................................................................................................... .......... Elevation TOC: fiiro .......................................... ............................................................................................................. Other: developed with Adams' peristaltic pump Sample Total Driven / Recovered Approximate USDA PID Interval Recovery Interval Depth Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) Soil Reading' feet BGS) (feet) (feet) feet BGS) Texture (ppm) 0.0 - 5.0 5.0 / 2.8 1.0 0.0 - 1 .0 Brown, soft, moist sandy silt with gravel topsoil (15°% gravel, sandy loam to silt loam _ 0.0 35% sand, 50% silt and clay). 1.0 1.0 - 2.0 Brown, slightly moist, firm silt fill (90% silt and clay, 10% angular silt 0.0 fine gravel). 0.8 2.0 - 2.8 Gray, wet, silty fine sand, trace angular gravel (75°% sand, 20 % loamy sand 30.0 silt and clay, 5% gravel). 5.0 - 10.0 5.0 / 3.2 3.0 5.0 - 8.0 Gray, wet, soft gravelly silt (70% silt and clay, 10% med. sand, gravelly silt loam 2.5 20°% angular fine gravel). 0.2 8.0 - 8.2 Brown, wet, loose medium sand. sand 1.2 10.0 - 15.0 5.0 / 3.3 3.3 10.0 - 13.3 Brown, wet loose sand, interlayered with gray silty fine sand sand and silt loam 2.9 Generalized Geologjc Log and Other Observations: 0.0'- 2.0': Topsoil and gravelly silt fill. 2.0' - 13.3': Marine/lacustrine sand and silt, trace gravel. Notes: = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. PGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled '01 SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelb.urne...R.oad...Mobil....North... ........................................................................................................ Location: Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT. Driller: Ge Adams -Adams En ineerin ......................................... ..............�............. Method: 2 3/8" Sampler (vibratory) ....................................................................................................... eol ist: Tim Schmalz .... ............... ....... Method: continuous samples Date 2/17l99 ...................................................................................................... Veather: Cold (200), overcast, light breeze. )cation: In grass island in Burger King Parking lot. WELL BORING ID: NM-21 Construction Information ...................................................................................... Total Depth Drilled:. ... BGS ................................................................................................................... Screen Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 9.0' - 1.5' BGS ................................................................................ Riser Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40 PVC /1.5' - 0.5' BGS ................................................................................................................................. ndpack Type/Interval: #1 sand 8 natural pack / 9.0' - 1.5' BGS ................................................................................................................................ Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite powder / 1.5' - 0.5' BGS ter LeveUDate 2.74/6.7.99 Wa ............................................ j........................................................... Elevation Ground:Y.I�Y6r. ..................................................................................................................... Elevation TOC �i with Adams' Sample Total Driven / Recovered Approximate USDA PID Interval Recovery Interval Depth Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) Soil Reading' (feet BGS) (feet) (feet) (feet BGS) Texture (ppm) 0.0 - 5.0 5.0 / 3.0 1.8 0.0-1.8 Brown, moist, loose fill (95%m to f sand, trace silt and clay). sand 0.0 1.2 1.8 - 3.0 Brown -gray, stiff, moist to wet, fine sand (90% fine sand, 10% loamy sand 0.0 silt and clay). 5.0 - 10.0 5.0 / 2.5 1.5 5.0 - 6.5 Same (as above) loamy sand 0.0 1.0 6.5 - 7.5 Gray, moist, stiff very fine sand and silt (50% of sand, 50% loam to silt loam 0.0 silt and clay). Generalized Geologic Log and Other Observations: 0.0'- 1.8': Fill -loose wet brown sand. 1.8'- 6.5% Marine fine sand and silt. 6.5' : Lacustrine very fine sand and silt. Utz ' = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled I -Vi SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG WELL BORING ID: MW-22 Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North ..................................................................................I.............................................................. Location: Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT. .................................................................................................................................................... Project Number: 04-06 ......................................... ....................................................... ...................... I.............................. Driller: Gerry Adams - Adams En.ineerin� ............................................................................................................ Drilling Method: 2 318" Sampler (vibratory) ............................................................................................................................. Geologist: Tim Schmalz .................................................................................................................................................... Sampling Method: continuous samples .................................................................................................................................................... Date: 2/17/99 ................................................................................................. Weather; Cold (200), overcast, light breeze. .................................................................................................................................................... Borin Location: Edge of high grass W of building, west of MW-18 Well Construction Information ...............TotaI ......... .. De ..t... P.h..Drilled..................12.5......' ..B...G.S........................: : ........................................................................... ....................................... Screen Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 12.5' - 2.5' BGS ............................................................................................................................................................................. Riser Type/Interval: 1:5" sch: 40 PVC / 2.5' 0.5' BGS ............................................................................................. Sandpack Type/Interval: #1 sand & natural pack / 12.5' - 1.5' BGS ........................................................................................................ Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite powder / 1.5' - 0.5' BGS ............................................................................................................................................................................. Water Level/Date 5.99/6.7.99 ...................................................... �)....................................................................................................................... ElevationGround: ............................................................................................................................ Elevation TOC:OW ............................................................................................................................................................................. Other: developed with Adams' peristaltic pump Sample Total Driven / Recovered Approximate IUSDA PID Interval Recovery Interval Depth Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) Soil Reading* (feet BGS) (feet) (feet) (feet BGS) Texture (ppm) 0.0 - 5.0 5.0 / 3.0 2.0 0.0-2.0 Brown, soft, moist to wet topsoil fill (10% fine gravel, 40% sand, silt loam 0.0 50% silt and clay). 1.0 2.0 - 3.0 Brown, wet , soft sand and gravel (fill) (40% m gravel, 60% sand). gravelly sand 0.0 5.0 - 10.0 5.0 / 3.8 2.0 5.0 - 7.0 Brown, wet, soft, gravelly sand fill ( 30% f to m gravel, 50% fine gravelly sandy loam 0.0 sand, 20% silt and clay). 1.8 7.0 - 8.8 Gray -brown firm, slightly moist fine sand (90%sand, 10% silt and sand 0.0 clay). 10.0 - 15.0 2.5 / 2.5 1.2 10.0 - 11.2 Same (sa above). sand 0.0 1.3 11.2 - 12.5 Gray, dry, stiff very fine sand and silt (50% of sand, 50% loam to silt loam 0.0 silt and clay). Generalized Geologic Log and Other Observations: 0.0' - 2.0': Topsoil fill - brown soft silt and sand. 3.0' - 11.0': Marine fine sand and silt. 11.0% Lacustrine very fine sand and silt. Notes: = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled SOIL BORING / MONIOTORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North ......................................................................................................................................................... Location: Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT. ......................................................................................................................................................... Project Number: 04-06 ............................................................................................................... Driller: Gerry Adams - Adams En ineenng ........................................................ ......................... .................. .. ... Drilling Method: 2 3/8" Sampler (vibratory Geologist: Tim Schmalz ...................ng.......M...ethod............: .. continuous ..........................samples.................................................................................... Sampli ......................................................................................................................................................... Date: 2/17199 ................................................................................................................... Weather: Cold (200), overcast, light breeze. .........�.................................................9....................................... g.........,................ Borin Location: Sticku manwa in rass west of buildin WELL BORING ID: MW.-23 Well Construction Information ............................................................................................................................................................................. Total Depth Drilled: 15.0' BGS .............................................................................................................................................................................. Screen Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 13.9' - 3.9' BGS ............................................................................................................................................................................. Riser Type/Interval: 1.5" sch..40 PVC / 3.9' - 1.7' AGS .............................................................................................. Sandpack Type/Interval: #1 sand & natural pack / 13.9' - 3.3' BGS .................................................................................................................... Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite powder / 3.3' - 2.5' BGS ...................................................................................................................................................................... Water Level/Date 9.56/6.7.99 ...................................................................................................................................................................... Elevation Ground: l .... ................................................................................................................................................ Elevation TOC: .............. I......................................... ,..................................................................,.................................................. Other: developed with Adams' peristaltic pump Sample Interval feet BGS) Total Driven / Recovery (feet) Recovered Interval (feet) Approximate Depth (feet BGS) IUSDA Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) Soil Texture PID Reading" (ppm) 0.0 - 5.0 4.1 / 2.3 2.3 0.0 - 2.3 Brown, loose, slightly moist sand rill (90% fine sand, 10% silt and clay). loamy sand 0.0 5.0 - 10.0 5.0 / 4.2 3.2 5.0 - 8.2 Same (as above) becoming 20% of gravel, 70% sand, 10% silt. gravelly loamy sand 0.0 1.0 8.2 - 9.2 Gray, slightly moist, stiff fine sand, trace silt. sand 1.2 10.0 - 15.0 5.0 / 2.9 1.9 10.0 - 11.9 Gray -green fine asnd, wet, firm (85% sand, 15% silt and clay). sandy loam 0.0 1.0 11.9 - 12.9 Gray, wet, soft silt, silt 0.0 Generalized Geologic Lou and Other Observations: 0.0'- 82: Fill - brown sand and gravel. 8.2' - 11.9': Fine marine sand and silt. 11.9' : Lacustrine silt and clay. Notes: = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North ................................................................................................................................................. Location: Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT. ................................................................................................................................................ Pro)ect..Number: 04-06 ............................................................................................................................................ Driller.: Gerry Adams : Adams Engineering ............................................. Drilling 5Method: 2 3/8" Sampie r (vibratory) ............................................................................................................................................... Geologist: Tim Schmalz ................................................................................................................................................ impling Method: continuous samples ................................................................................................................................................. Date: 8/23/99 ........................................................................................................................................ Weather: Warm (80°), sunny .................................. ........................................................................ ......................... I............. 0ring Location: Below MW-4, in grass by light pole WELL BORING ID: MW-24 Well Construction Information ............................................................................................................................................. Total Depth Drilled: 10.0' BGS ....................................................... .............................................................................. I ...... , Screen Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 9.5' - 1.5' BGS .............................................................................................................................................. Riser Type/interval: 2.0" sch. 40 PVC /1.5 - 0.3' BGS .................................................................................................................................... Sandpack Type/Interval: #1 sand & natural pack / 10.0' - 2.0' BGS ...................................................... ..... ............................................................... I................... Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite powder / 2.0'- 1.0' BGS .............................................................................................................................................. Water Level/Date 4.99 / 9.1.99 .............................................................................................................................................. Elevation Ground. dOW ............................................................................................................................................... Elevation TOC: ........................................................ ........ ............................ .............................. "................. Other: developed with Adams' peristaltic pump Sample Total Driven / Recovered Approximate IUSDA PID Interval Recovery Interval Depth Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) Soil Reading` (feet BGS) (feet) (feet) (feet BGS) - Texture (p m) 0.0 - 5.0 5.0 / 1.8 1.8 0.0 - 1.8 Brown, loose, slightly moist f to m sand with trace silt (fill) (80% loamy sand 0.0 sand, 20% silt and clay). 5.0 - 10.0 5.0 / 4.0 2.0 5.0 - 7.0 Brown, very fine sand and silt, moist to wet, firm (30% sand, 70 % silty clay loam 0.0 silt and clay). 2.0 1 7.0 - 9.0 lGray, wet, stiff sticky silt and clay (1 00 % silt and clay). silty clay 0.4 Generalized Geologic Lou and Other Observations: 0.0' - 2.0': Fill, brown loose topsoil -silty sand and clay. 2.0'- 7.0': Marine fine sand with silt. 7.0' - 9.0': Lacustrine gray silt and clay. Notes: = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled 1 .T4 Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North .............................................................................................................................. » ......................... Location: Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT. .............................................................................»............................................. Pro)ect Number. 04-06 ................. ».............................................................................. Driller: Ge Adams - Adams En ineerin .....................»...................RY....................................... .......... .....9..................................... . Dulling Method 2 3/8" Sampler (vibratory) ........................................:................................................................................................................ Geologist: Tim Schmalz .... ....... ....... ......... ....... .......... .................... ...... ...................................................................... Sampling Method: continuous samples ......................................................................................................................................................... Date: 8/23/99 ........................................................(.....o,.................................................................................... Weather: Warrri 80 sunny ...............................»................»..... ............. ..........»............. BOfin LOCatIOn: In grass at west edge of property, below power pole. LOG WELL BORING ID: MW-25 "I Construction Information _................................................................................................................................................................. Total Depth Drilled: 10.0' BGS ..... ...... ................................................................»......................................................._.... ................ .................. Screen Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 9.5' - 1.5' BGS .......................................................................................................................................................... Riser Type/interval: 1.5" sch. 40 PVC / 1.5'- 0.3' BGS ....................................................................... .._....................................... ...... Sandpack Type/Interval: #1 sand & natural pack / 10.0' - 1.5' BGS .................................................................._.............................................................................................. Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite powder / 1.5' - 0.5' BGS ...................... »................................ ..................................».......»...»................................. »»........................... Water Level/Date 4.2219.1.99 ....I ........................................................ ................................. ._.................................................... .... ...... .... Elevation Ground:660116 ...................................................................................................................................................................»........ Elevation TOC: .......................................... »»......._....»ms'......penstalG»...:............c...... pu....... mp..................................... Other developed with Ada Sample Total Driven / Recovered Approximate USDA PID Interval Recovery Interval Depth Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) Soil Reading" feet BGS) (feet) (feet) feet BGS) Texture (ppm 0.0 - 5.0 5.0 / 2.9 2.9 0.0 - 2.9 Brown, slightly moist to moist, loose/soft m sand and silt, grading loam to slit loam 0.0 Into of sand and sit (50 to 30% sand, 50 to 70% sift and clay). 5.0 -10.0 5.0 / 5.0 5.0 5.0 - 10.0 Brown, wet sift with fine sand (50/50) grading into gray, firm loam to silt 0.0 1 sin and day (100% sift and day). Generalized Geologic Lou and Other Observations: 0.0' - 1.5': Topsoil, soft brown loam. 1.5'- 9.0': Marine soft silty sand. 9.0' - 10.0': Lacustrine silt and clay, firm, wet. Notes: " = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled TRUCTION LOG WELL BORING ID::NM-26 (EW-l) Sample Total Driven / Recovered Approximate USDA PID Interval Recovery Interval Depth Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) Soil Reading* feet BGS (feet) feet feet BGS Texture m) 0.0 - 5.0 5.0 / 2.0 2.0 0.0 - 2.0 Black to dark gray, slightly moist angular gravel and silty sand till gravelly sandy loam ' 168.0. (25% ang. M gravel, 55% sand, 20% silt and day). 5.0 - 10.0 5.0 / 2.4 2.0 5.0 - 7.0 Brown -gray, slightly moist to moist, firm angular gravel and gravelly silt loam 257.0 sandy sift (fill) (30% gravel, 30% sand, 40% sift and day). 0.4 7.0 - 7.4 Brown sand, product saturated fine sand over gray sift and fine sand 2000+ sand. 10.0 - 15.0 5.0 / 4.0 1.0 10.0 -11.0 Gray free product saturated sand and gravel. gravelly sand 1350.0 3.0 11.0 - 14.0 lGray. firm, slightly moist silt and clay (100% sift and day). silt 90.6 Generalized Geologic Log and Other Observations: 0.0' - 7.0% Fill, consisting of angular gravel and silty sand. 7.0' -11.0% Marine sands and silts. 11.0' - 14.0' : Lacustrine silt and clay. Notes* * = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, iso. bGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled Well Construction Information (NEW WELL CONSTRUCTED 6-5-00 .................................................. ................................................................ Total Depth Drilled: 15.0' BGS ............................................................................................................................................................................................... Scxeen Type/Interval: 1.5* sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 13.0' - 3.0' BGS .......................................................................................................................................................................... Riser Type/Interval: 1.5* sch. 40 PVC / 3.0' - 0.3' BGS ....................................................................................:.......................................................................................................... Sandpack Type/Interval: #1 sand � natural pads . Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite powder / 1.5' 0.5' BGS ......................... ............................. .........................................................................._.............................................................. Water Level/Date Free product present at 6' BGS / 9-1-99 ............................................................................................................................................ Elevation Ground: .......................................................................................................................,..... ................... Elevation TOC; Other: developed with Adams' peristaltic pump Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North - .......................................................................................................................................... Location: Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington ton VT. .................................................................................. Project Number: 04-06 .......................................................................................................................................... Driller: Gerry Adams - Adams Engineering ........................... ............................... Drilling Method. 2 3/8" Sampler (vibratory) ...................... Geologist: Tim Schmalz .........'m-'p"...........................'n-ii'.......................................................................................... Sampling Method: continuous samples ..................................................................................................................... Date: 8/23/99 .......................................................................................................................................... Weather: Warm (800) sunny .....................................:.................................................................................................... Borin Location' Immed. N of UST pad to rear of buildin Well Construction Information Totai DeQth Drilled; 15.0' BGS ...... ...................................................................................................... Screen Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40, 10-slot PVC / 13.0' - 3.0' BGS .................................................................................................................................................................. Riser Type/Interval: 1.5" sch. 40 PVC / 3.0' - 0.3' BGS ................................................... .............................. ....................................................... I......................... Sandpack Type/Interval: #1 sand & natural pack / 13.0' - 2.0' BGS .................................................................................................................................................................. Seal Type/Interval: Bentonite powder / 2.0'- 0.5' BGS .................................................................................................................................................................. Water LeveVDate 6.93' / 9.1.99 .................................................................................................................................................................. Elevation Ground: 990k* ................................................... ................................................. ....................................... I...................... Elevation TOC: 9F.VP .................................................................................................................................... Other: developed with Adams' peristaltic pump Sample Total Driven ! Recovered Approximate USDA PID Interval Recovery Interval Depth Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) Soil Reading* (feet BGS) (feet) (feet) feet BGS) Texture (ppm) 0.0 - 5.0 5.0 / 2.0 2.0 0.0-2.0 Brown, loose, dry to slightly moist, angular gravel and silt (fill), gravelly loam 0.0 5.0 - 10.0 5.0 / 1.0 1.0 5.0 - 6.0 Same (as above), wet. gravelly loam 0.0 10.0 - 15.0 5.0 / 5.0 5.0 10.0 - 15.0 Brown, mottled gray, stiff, slightly moist to wet silt and clay (100% silty clay nm silt and clay). Generalized Geologic Log and Other Observations: 0.0'- 6.0': Fill, gray gravel and silty sand. 6.0' - 10.0': Marine silt and sand. 10.0' - 15.0': Lacustrine silt and sand. Notes: * = Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled SOIL BORING / MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG WELL BORING ID: EW-2 Client / Site: S B Collins, Inc., Shelburne Road Mobil North ......................................................................................................................................................... Location: Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington VT. Project Number 04-06 ......................................................................................................................................................... Driller: Tri State ......................................................................................................................................................... Drilling Method: 6.25-ID HSA ......................................................................................................................................................... Geologist: Tim Schmalz ......................................................................................................................................................... Sampling.....Method....: .sp..lit..sp.o.ons. ..........:...................................................................................... ....................................... Date: 6-5-00 ......................................................................................................................................................... Weather: Warm (800), sunny Bonin Location b buildin and MW-11 ction Information :pth Drilled: 12' p. e/Interval: 2.0-inch 12 - 2' BGS oe/Interval: inch 0 - 2BGS >eal Type/Interval: Bentonite Chips, 0.5 - 1.5' ... :... ...... ..... .......................:................................................. Water Level/Date 5.32' on 6/8/00 ...................................................................................... Elevation Ground: ..Elevation TOC:................................................... Sample Interval feet BGS) Total Driven / Recovery (feet) Recovered Interval (feet) Approximate Depth (feet BGS) Sample Description (color, texture, moisture, etc.) PID Reading* (ppm) 3 - 5' 2.011.25 0 - 1.25 3 - 4.25 Brown, Moist, SILTY SAND (75% sand M-F, 25% silt & day) 1.9 5 - 7' 2.0 / 1.0 0 - 1.0 5-6 Brown, Wet, SILTY SAND & 15% GRAVEL 10 - 12' 2.0 / 1.25 0 - 0.5 10 -11 Brown, Wet, SILTY SAND & 15`Yo GRAVEL, sheens 1785.0 0.5 - 1.0 11-12 Gray SILT & CLAY, stiff 12 - 14' 2.0 / 2.0 0 - 2.0 12-14 Gray SILT & CLAY, stiff, mottled, wet to sl. wet 63.2 Generalized Geologic Loa and Other Observations: 0 - 5', brown silty sand 5 - 11' brown silty sand, some gravel 11 - 14' gray silt/clay, lacustrine/marine fine-grained deposit Notes: •10 .= Peak Headspace Reading, Photovac 2020 with 10.6 eV lamp, calibrated to isobutylene. BGS = Below Ground Surface, NR = No Recovery, NS = not sampled - mw-1 Water Quality Summary, Shelbume Road Mobil Nortb, So. Burlington, VP, SMS Site #94-1589. (-ulu in ug/L) Sample Dab Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xyienee YTBE Water LwmI 6 BG8 1,3,5-Trl- meth (benzene 1,2,4-Tri- math Ibenrene Naphthalene 1122/93 '77-..,. 1 1 t '_:_ '. 1 , f"' : - 560 6.04 122/93 � 470 6.00 1119/94 _- t �- i -- - - 1 ty 568 6.02 1215i94 - 1 --- - t i �' s�, ; __? T' . 382 6.38 4!&95 1 -_- 1 --� 1 - 1 -' 1 t .; ti. • +,: 361 6.69 6/13/95 360 025 8/17195 254 5.62 10,27/95 290 6.92 123796 T--7 1. - -- ,,s 193 6.74 626Y98 279 6.97 8/14I96 ip7 -1 -T - - - - t -- 1 M3 6.36 11/18/96 s v 218 6.94 32"7 ---- -- 194 5.84 - 626)97 - 1 1 - - - -1 136 6.80 4/B/9B �' -';�1 -- _ --- t - 1 1 - _ ] '.d�::�- 144 5.56 10/6/98 2.6 1 5.7 .1;*i�;;.170 130 6.01WiA� v2.%. .-..;fi 1 6.2612/13M Wwm t t t 180 6.15 + MO 10/6/00 'i-1.1 .1n 1 t s5ti:: 129 662 1 -„+,a Mshaded cel - not detected at or above stated concentration 1A00 5.0 52 5.4 5.6 5.8 y B too 6.0 B u u 6.2 n 64 6.6 6.8 7.0 t0 Decor oscw DecGl OF95 Dwee D-0 Deoea Dwpe Dac Dw01 Data lremBN'eah t M7BE -i- Wale, Level • (ft BGS) MW1 M W-2 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE Water Level ft BGS 1,3,5•Tri- meth (benzene 1,2,4-Tri. meth (benzene Naphthalene 11/22/93 2,500 3,600 2,400 8.700 19.000 5.86 7/19/94 830 1,250 530 3,500 33,500 5.25 12/5/94 3 7 5 41 57 6.30 416/95 2.080 1,950 1.650 7.210 132.000 5.67 6/13/95 2,070 1,470 361 3,920 88,000 5.71 8/17/95 885 482 194 1.710 32,500 5.49 10/27/95 436 18 29 259 19,000 5.68 1/23l96 1.260 252 175 1.690 19,500 5.97 6/26/96 1,710 142 148 1.170 15,100 5.04 8/14/96 2,210 167 206 1,990 14,300 5.58 11/18/96 1,220 75 124 1.390 10.100 5.76 3/28/97 2,210 429 259 3,140 4,330 5.56 8/25/97 145 24 43 606 128 5.71 4/9198 86 39 52 838 30 4.72 10/6/98 1,600 90 68 6B0 650 5.91 25 92 22 617/99 1.200 20 40 270 730 5.81 1 24 38 u ' 12/13199 3,100 160 1,000 1,400 5.97 ? M 130 140 5/23/00 12.8 �._.4.. 2.5 28.3 4.77 3.3 8.0 5.8 10l5/00 60 9.2 62.5 6.11 10.2 11.3 24.9 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration Note : Data for 6/7/99 is for the duplicate sample, as the reported sample results were all non -detects below 100 u9/L. 1,000,000 4.0 100,000 1.5 A 5.0 S 2 10,000 p 8 i 1,000 t,. . 1 5.5 100 / f 10 6.5 Y 1 7.0 Aug87 AueJM Aug Aug 96 heel A gde A g-W Aug-00 Auge1 Data (.Dodgy"') --�-Benzene --f-Toke ENylUenzono --)(- Xylenes -is-- MTBE .. •A- • Water Level • (* BGS) MIW-2 (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene L Toluene Ethylbenzene I Xylenes MTBE I, Water Level ` ft BGS) 1,3,5-Tri- meth (benzene 1,2,4-Tri- meth (benzene Naphthalene 11/22/93 1 - 1 --- 1 ' 1°; 5,600 6.47 12/5/94 ---� --1— 7.470 _ 6.91 4/6/95--- 1 - 1 - 100 - 5 1 1 ----1 ---- 1 V 1 3,120 6.12 6/13/95 - 2 - 100 -5 8.550 6.48 _ W17/95 - 100 1— 6,780 6.08 10/27/95 100 8,530 6.18 123/96 5 - -, 5 21,600 6.15 6/26/96 66 —10 - — t 0 - - ` 10 ----10 7 57,600 5.75 8/14/96 34 — 10 — 10 - - 10 60,000 6.51 11l18/96 10 ' - - 5 10 - - S 10 46,000 8.41 328/97 - - 5 5 - — - 29,900 5.82 825/9y 6 5 — 5 5 31,200 6.51 4/9/98 73 -1 o `- 10 -- 200 a 0 - -_ 200 20 15,200 4.51 10/6/98 600 200 14,000 6.89 ':;: 6/7/99 280 20 - - 20 7,500 6.90 . ✓1. ', v' y.. 5 i"a4,: r 7 12/13/99 32 20 20 —_ ---- 50 50 ---20 7.500 7.04 523/00 51.2 50 50 -. 3,240 5.84 :;M. • fi� .< f j ,,. ss? t' . A 6t .. 10I5/00 69.5 50 50 3,220 7.04 BU .' ,z �'w.5b M shaded cell - not detected at or above slated concentration 100,000 4.0 K� 4.5 10,000 �7 5.0 v d� 1,000 s 5.5 c c t e ` e 5.0 u 100 ° fA e. e e a 6.5 10 A--'--'---e. e e 7.0 1 7.5 Deo92 D-93 Dec-94 D-95 D-96 Dec-97 Dec-98 Dec-99 Dec-00 Dec-01 Date (monthlyear) Benzene ---W MTSE - - & - • Water Level(R BGS) MW-3 �sr M W-4 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE Water Level • R BGS 1,3,5-Tri- meth (benzene 1,2,4.Tri• meth (benzene Naphthalene 11/22t93 1 � 1 _ ; ` "1 4,000 6.64 7/19/94 — 1 -- - - - 1 -`- i -- 2.0 ,.. 'I - -- 1 ,' Y_, > 500) 6.31 12/5/94 —1- - 1 r :�:. < ^ 3.020 7.18 4/6/95 _1 1 — --1--- 1 ; ,y. �'r 2.6W e.22 6/13l95 2,030 6.88 8/17/95 1 ' 1.480 6.24 10/27/95 50 —5 - 1 - 50 T -- S — — 50 --- 5 50..t"^• 1,940 6.01 6/2198 6 5a' 1,180 5.64 11/16/9e - - 1 --� - 868 6.28 3/28197 1 -- — , - 1 - 1 -- 1 859 5.7e 8/25197 1 1 829 8.71 4/9/98 2.0 — - -- - + s' ,' a`f; 214 5.13 10/6l98 1,- - - b,7 -6" 13 18,000 627 1.1 1.9 6/7/99 1 1 23,100 3,420 19,070 660 7.56 910 3.250 760 12/13/99 540 26,000 21,000 100,000 900 nm 49,000 100,000 27,000 PAVO$'FM202 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration 100,000 5.00 5.50 10,000 6.00 1,DD0 S fr F _ 6.50 8 100 $ uo 7.00 N 10 7.50 104 "DO Apr 93 fug-93 D-93 Apr-8C Au9-91 0ec-9 Apr 95 A g-95 Dec-95 Apr-96 Au9-96 Dea96 Mar-97 Ju 97 Nov-97 Mar-96 JW-98 Nov-98 --W JW-W Nov-99 M-00 Jul-00 Date (monthtyear) —*-0enzene—W—Toluene ENylbenzene—X—Xylenes—*—MTBE——Water level -(M BGS) MW-4 M W-5 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE Water Level (ft BGS) 1,3,5-Tri- meth lbenzene 1,2,4-Ttt- meth (benzene Naphthalene 11/22/93 3 2 4 5 4,200 6.02 12/5194 175 5 8 13 20.300 6.40 4/6195 145 6 6 11 6,700 5.65 6/13/95 198 9 9 4 19,100 5.95 8/17195 153 �' - *.•"- ti' �= ` ; ° 11.900 1 5.63 10/27/95 226 w -1-, yt ��- ;, Y 18,500 5.83 1/23/96 107 5 •�a_; "� 15,200 5.98 6/26/96 64 i. - °' _ 5,020 5.23 8/1 V96 86 10.700 5.89 11/16/96 131 - 1 „, ate' 2 '• 3 8,680 5.92 3128197 36 1,020 5.43 8/25/97 269 2 5 2 3,510 5.96 4/9/98 15 ." 213 4.92 10/6/98 160 4.3 1.8 4.8 2,200 6.32 6F7/99 370 i"y'•; ` 17 23 2,900 6.24 12/13/99 89 _ 2,500 6.42 - - ` Ley 411 6.42 �- ri' °`m..: �',_r`..' _w ` *'V = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used /n graph below 100.000 4.5 10.000 � Y � \ 7 5.0 \Y/ g � 1,000 5.5 8 e `s too a0 U O a to rt a.5 t 4! / 7.0 Dwez Dwfe 0eo01 D 46 D"7 Dac88 D—W Dw00 Dec0I Date anontlJyear) —aenz - Tok— EOgAbaaens—11--Xylenes—=—M1BE t Wger Leval '(M1 BGS) Mp•S MW-6 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE Water Level (ft BGS) 4/6/95 -77 -TV 57 xg " t g T' 12 1 5 2�� 1 693 2.13 6/13/95 1 21 695 2.02 8/17/95 2 657 2.36 10/27/95 -1 1 756 2.34 1/23/96 3 1 282 2.72 6/26/96 230 181 2.34 2.72 8/14/96 1 A 11/16/96 5 5 5 619 2.33 3/28/97 1 144 1.68 8/25/97 15 3.06 10000 low I = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below ------------------------------------ - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date MW-6 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 20 2�5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 MW-7 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE Water Level " ft BGS 4/6/95 14 � , t WIF Mi.Mi. - n , a c y '� 1.13 6113/95 ,. 90 ,' H " " 0.50 8/17/95 ,; ., 2::s z " . ` f r " 1.22 6/26/96 = ' `. 3 '` 0.25 8/14/96 1.62 11l18/96 `''u . s,$ 1.43 10,000 1,000 J 7 Z QO K 100 Uj 0 Z z 0 U 10 1 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below p------- - - - - -n -----e-------------------------------1 -------------------------- Date MW-7 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 a 0.8 g 1.0 12 m 1.4 1.6 1.8 MW-8 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE Water Level ft BGS 4/6/95 :< 32"' `n��r g tx�s'> 1.19 6/ 13/95 5 6 :. 3 K u-44 r 1.65 8/17/95 ;; 2� 1.54 10/27/95 ' 0.60 1/23/96 ' i Y =K 2.36 8/14/96 11 / 18/96 t � 15 t YIOWA `;sE ft% '. r a fl:a ,1.72 1.82 3/28/97 _ 0.65 8/25/97 `1 1t _ 1.83 12/13/99 5 T10 v <10r �a }.b � ;,Y 0.98 1 „`� = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below MW-8 MW-9 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MTBE: Water Level fl BGS 1,3,5-Tri- meth benzene 1,2,4-Tri- meth benzene Naphthalene 4/6/95 '' ,y,. 38 �5r f 1`": "1 - 1,130 1.03 6113/95 I_ 4 ,r <•; 5 t „ ' 1 '-1� 1,110 2.06 8/17/95 1 - -1- — --1 1 - - 844 1.38 10/27/95 1 - 1 1 -- 823 0.50 1/23/96-- 1 - - 1 1 - _ 597 2.69 -- — - 6/26196 x--:+; 1 1 927 1.27 .. 8/14/96 - - +_ 7--- _ 733 1.93 11/18/98 1� 1 1 1� 1,130 1.74 3/28/97 ---' _-- 1 -- --_ 1 " - 1 ---- 143 8/25/97 ------_--- -11 - 607 2.23 4/9198 - 1 ------ 1,220 0.10 10/6/98 13 6.3 1 1 1 1 1 1,100 0.83 ' ,' . .. t.. F ,. ...., 1 6/7/99 620 1.78 1 12/13/99 14.0 _- 10 ---- 10 ------ - J ;t" 1,300 0.71 10 _ - -10 - - '1D_-_ 5/23/00 (1 1'. - 20 _ 20 - 2J ,t)�,; 1,580 1.15 : 20 - 20 20 10/5/00 2.2;' 2 2 - - 2 ..;?-•. 220 1.23 :: '.; 2;, r,.". - 2 2 shaded call - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 10,000 A D.00 Q o.so 1,000 A n 1.00 Y P C A o 100 1.50 $ d 0 u 2.00 10 2,50 G 1 3.00 D-94 D-95 0-98 D-97 D-08 Dac-99 D-00 D-01 Date (monfl*.ar) -4-Benzene --i- MTBE • --A• • . Water Level' (11 BGS) MW-9 .- ... � ate` .+g+u•. .....�......� ax...mv..._=-.w-a..»: K-!fiF.. .'ask.-+�.�. % ��+Y...,��-v.--vm>'R^^"�,o- 7.....�. ,,.�•e� ,w,q.: .. ... .-..�� .- ..v-.�.-.., .. ... ..... _�.-.. :.. MW-10 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lenes MTBE Water Level' ft BGS 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 5/27/98 3,550 94 1,540 5,550 2,040 6.10 10/6/98 5,400 2,700 11,000 1,300 6.27 1,000 3,300 560 617/99 4,800 a 1,600 5,700 3,000 6.47 850 2,100 450 12/13/99 3,300" ;' 1,600 6,000 3,100 6.53 630 1,900 310 5/23/00 2,020 99 1,460 5,370 2,740 5.33 625 2,030 583 10/5/00 3,950 65 1,830 5,940 2,530 1 6.74 502 1,590 493 100,000 10,000 100 to +- Jan-98 f = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below A•. • ....... -A ..................... .A •n Jul-98 Jan-99 Jul-99 Jan-00 Jul-00 Data (monthlyear) - 0 Benzene - Toluene Ethylbervene --X-Xylenes CIF-MTBE - - -A - - Water Level • (ft BGS) MIN-10 4.0 4.5 5.0 p s i 0 f 5.5 a a 8.0 N 6.5 17.0 Jan-01 MW-11 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug(L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lenes MTBE Water Level ` ft BGS) 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4•TMB Naphthalene 5/27198 4,140 209 1,510 5.730 2,020 6.60 10/6/98 4,800 300 1,600 5,800 1,000 6.64 380 1,300 280 6/7/99 4,000 170 1,200 4,300 1,200 6.95 440 1,200 270 12/13/99 5,500 230 1,700 5,500 1,400 6.89 390 1,300 270 10/5/00 3,960 138 1,220 3,070 916 7.03 218 798 249 shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 6.6 10,000 6.6 6.7 6.7 • o 6.8 v 8 0 6.8 � 1,000 m o m o V e - TO 7.0 7.1 7.1 100 Dec-97 Dec-98 Dec-99 Deo-00 Date (monthlyear) 0 BenzeneToluene E"benzene --*—Xylenes--*—MTBE - -G- Water Level '(ftBGS) MW-11 MW-12 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sam le Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbanzene X MTBE Water Level ` ft BGS 1,3,5•TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 5127/98 7,270 7,040 310 1.020 3,720 5.84 6!//99 3,700 230 460 1,700 2,200 6.45 740 1,400 350 12M3199 5,600 660 2,400 11,000 6.31 720 1,700 340 10/5/00 3,420 111 1,020 2,030 2,390 6.57 633 1,760 1,150 r = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 5.0 100,000 - 5.2 5.4 5.6 10,000 O J a A V 5.6 N O - O C �- eS 6.0 a b c m o c 6.2 w CO o V - 1,000 • - N 6.4 6.6 6.6 100 j 7.0 Dec-97 Dec-98 Deo99 Dec-00 Date (montlo-r) —0 Benzene--f--Tokmm Elhybenzena --N--Xylenes If WME - +- Wabrt.evel'(flBGS) MW-12 MW-13 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site 494-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lenes MTBE Water Level • ft BGS 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 5/27/98 :` N" yF ; 'g fi, . ems' s , ,t� w_ 5.62 10/6/98ai ,."8h a " "�„ l ' �° i w, x a x_ v sk /b.. x r� 5.51 g z 617/99 6.22 R r i s 12/13/99 "k " ., F. p ' , sz . p 6.22 5/23/00 158.0 ,� 9 ;� r. a`, 1,440 5.19 pg 10/5/00 F.. v. _.., ` Y fi` 7 fx. ' y` c . a 6.18 ^$ = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration MW-13 MW-14 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug(L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lenes MTBE Water Level' ft BGS 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 5/27/98 Z y 9:r - 1 2 5.32 10/6/98 Sa n v, 1.5 5.02 z s°�� }# s W # µ u, .; ' >� l w� fi 6/7/99'� 12/13/99 : "? ° `Af.y:#; n . ° t?1:.. 5.51 5.16 kt a 7 ef,i1ots 9x .r'.a ,w "fir,.;. }Y t v Css 1015100 r `1 . , S ., r, i -A4 = shaded cell- not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 4.0 10.0 a.2 4.4 4.6 0 J q a.e � m C ° 1.0 5.0 u � m um 5.2 ^ U m Gf N 5.4 5.6 5.8 0.1 6.0 Dec-97 Dec-98 Dec-99 Dec-00 Date (monthlyear) --t-Benzene -!-Toluene Ethylbenzene - X Xylenes -ME MTBE --*--Water Level* (ft BGS) MIN- 14 MW-15 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lenes MTBE Water Level ft BGS) 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 5/27/98 78 64 207 969 26 5.41 10/6/98 40 35 120 600 27.0 5.21 97 460 59 6/7/99 18 13 96 370 a 5.60 72 340 45 12/13/99 20 28 160 700 s 5.41 120 540 62 5/23/00 25.4 ' 90 337 e y' `; w: 5.07 56.5 284 49.6 10/5/00 3.9 3.3 16 31.4 5.82 11.8 99 12.1 ass _ -shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 1.000.0 5.0 5.1 5.2 - 5.3 100.0 � a v 5.4 rs o k 5.5 u 'a C 5.6 '• v 10.0 m ti v 5.7 5.8 5.9 1.0 6.0 Jan-98 Jul-98 Jan-99 Jul-99 Jan-00 Jut-00 Jan-01 Date (mondVyear) - 6 Benzene —f--Toluene Ethylbenzene —X Xylenes—iIE-MTBE —h—Water Level (R BGS) MW-15 MW-16 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lenes MTBE Water Level ` ft BGS 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 5/27/98-:n3�gy i' i}' "ru Y h, a.? s;� ,::'`Srti 122 5.63 10/6/98 iz s ':t v�{aiY °� s �Y' w 6?sriv, xrx s ;` gu 170 5.52 tiV4 fir# is rNI?, I INUM 677/99 + •" ^" t " K` J fi : 0 120 5.79$ 12/13/99xs ;,". i tkRr" z.' ,, Tea 100 5.63 �; t, rr„�= k ° 57 5.15 100.0 1.0 0.1 -- Jan-98 = shaded Gell -not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below A Jul-98 Jan-99 Jul-99 Date (monthlyear) ---* Benzene ---E—Toluene Ethytbenzene ---X—Xylenes ---llf—MTBE • - -A • • Water Level' (ft BGS) MW-76 Jan-00 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 m O 5.4 0 m 5.5 0 5.6 (a 5.7 5.8 5.9 --4 6.0 Jul-00 MW-17 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lenes MTBE Water Level' ft BGS) 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 5/27198 2 k .= i 10 23 2 4.90 10/6/98 2.1 � 2.3 3.2 3.1 4.73 x"'? 7.9 2.0 6/7/99 1.3 i 3.0 2.2 5.16 2.2 12/13/99 1.010 z C)u4.91 ay s shaded cell not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below '100.0 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 J O O O � 4.8 � N O 'q 10.0 5.0 b o � u ^ c 5.2 U � CO 5.4 5.6 5.8 1.0 i i i 6.0 Mar-98 May-98 Jul•98 Sep-98 Nov-98 Jan-99 Mar-99 May-99 Jul-99 Sep-99 Nov-99 Jan-00 Date (monthlyear) --4--Benzene Ethylbenzene —X Xylenes CIF MTBE --*—Water Level'(ft BGS) MW-17 M W-18 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lenes MTBE Water Level' (ft BGS) 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 10/6/98 150 2.6 1.2 6.5 1,200 6.94 z? 6/7/99 35+ . k•, - 4. �tk , n i e, s= Y� 340 6.74 y r - .. a�SeK 71� A• o;�}...3.r i$.'<�kk �s .r �f� +w<�,. ". 12/13/99 110'���()s ,r .� .. et �rr1 ' . 3 yam: 2,300 6.33 5/23/00 51.9 dF,"a� `RC �� 4'":; ti. ++ e ""��Mw.. x hw'khd°tx'�" .:, 516 5.22 :a»F-`.�,;,w¢'•��n f. . r . ::1' Y;' 10/5/00 184.0 �h ,'•��'..; .. J ... �,� . �,4raif �a ;s 2,770 s�$ �, ) = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 10,000 0.0 1.0 1,000 2.0 0 3.0 C O O a 100 4.0 w C O O C O 5.0 tD U �• N 10 6.0 •............ A, .............. 7.0 1 8.0 Dec-97 Deo-98 De 99 Dec-00 Date (month/year) —0 Benzene ---f--Toluene Ethylbenzene —X-•—Xylenes—•91F—MTBE • • •A • •Water Level' (ttBGS) MW-18 MW-19 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (resitits in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethy(benzene Xylenes MTBIE Water Level * (ft BGS) 1,3,5-TMB 1,2A-TMB Naphthalene 10/6/98 320 80 ... 15 60 3,400 6.31 y x 1.8 aX., I ME 6/7/99 3,300 54 68 210 15,000 7.15 17w1fiK .......... .......... 9/20/99 1,400 91 120 470 6,000 6.48 99 12113/99 1,200 R, F C 11,000 6.71 805 1,120 5.23 M 5/23/00 355 10,400 7.54 IRM 10/5/00 517 ce I s6ded I -not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 6.0 100,000 5.5 10,000 6.0 1,000 o .0 6.5 100 0 7.0 0 10 7.5 8,0 1 Jul-98 Jar'99 Jul-99 Jan-00 Jul-00 Jan-01 Date (mont!Wyear) 0 Benzene )K MTBE A Water Lei MW-19 MW-20 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lanes MTBE Water Level • ft BGS 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Na hthalene 10/27/98 270 ".` nt m�' .;';. -' , EK-WOa: 3,400 5.60 ; 6/7/99 110 , a s F c 1,200 6.59 g s 12/13/99 14 wv n 230 5.82 r k _ P . " a 10/5/00 2,050 1,050 882 4,730 350 6.91 86 242 51 dva;�t3 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 10,000 5.0 5.2 5.4 A 5.6 1 000 a J p 6.0 o m c 6.2 o v a � 100 6.4 zi 6.6 6.6 'a 10 7.0 JUI-96 Jan-99 Jul-99 Jan-00 Jul-00 Jan-01 Date (monthtyeor) —+—Benzene—i—MTBE • • .A - • Water Level' (tt BGS) NW2O MW-21 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Et h (benzene X lenes MTBE Water Level' It BGS) 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 617/99 60 : -s: ; g 330 2.74 12/13/99 gr i v 1 F sc 130NO 3.04 �P :ri d ;if p 4} et S 10/5/00 5 ,. ,q.st iti 3 3.2 58 3.27� = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration 1000.0 0.0 0.5 P 1.0 ii 100.0 ;� ° 2.0 b o c i u e t)0.0 1 2.5 n v A......... ............ 3.5 4.0 1.0 Jan-99 Jul-99 Jan-00 Jul-00 Jan-01 Date Benzene �—Toluene Ethylbenzene 0 Xylenes --*— MTBE - - -t - - Water Level ' (tt BGS) L MW-21 MW-22 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene - _- J 5 - -C F - — Toluene - - 1 _ ---- -- - - Ethylbenzene -__ 1 _- Xylenes 1 — -1 : MTBE - - - --- - 4.9 _ 1 Water Level' (It BGS) - 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Na hthalone 6/7/99 5.99 12/13/99 --- - 1 <- 5.35 10/5/00 - 1.4-- i 61 6.43r ,$ '. VWEMRMWy, = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below MW-22 MW-23 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene nes MTBE Water Level - (ft BGS) 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Na hthalene 6!7/99 211 9 "e<*Y t' 620 9.5612/13/99 12 �r. a,xyL s` gX .: 740 8.715/23/00�,��A.8.0210/5/00 37 a�1+s c5ro .} ;.' 1,680 9.87 ..xt �W = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 10.000 7.0 7.5 1,000 0 ? - � 8.0 v h � o E 0 100 8.5 'g U 9.0 uJ 10 ... . - 9.5 A, -A 10.0 1 Jan-99 Jul-99 Jan-00 Jul-00 Jan-01 Date (monthtyear) ---*--Benzene--MTBE - • •d - - Water Level ' (ft BGS) MW-23 MW-24 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene Xylenes MTBE Water Level • (ft BGS 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 9/20/99 150 45 32 61 860 3.32 7.7 27 5.9 12/13/99 300 32 94 110 3,000 3.93 19 100 18 5/23/00.w _ t aat rap. 3.37 1 1 10/5/00 236 4,330 4.54 7..? li«xv",:tY...b',*q ri.;.. kpJ3 Fray"` = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 10,000 - 2.0 2.5 1,000 0 3.0 V i a o 0 F e 100 x m^ 15 m = u 0 x R $ U o £ 4.0 0 0 10 4.5 1 5.0 Jul-99 Jan-00 Jul-00 Jar,01 Date (monthlyear) �—Benzene —W—Toluene Ethylbenzene x Xylenes --1[—MTBE - ..A - - Water Level • (ft BGS) MW-25 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene X ley•nes MTBE Water Level' it BGS 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 1.4. 110 2.20 �'' r ,. nSk ;• y l '' • 1 § =r.�, 0.7 E14 7912/13/99 3.39 y9/20l99 2372.110/5/00 r4 = shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration .e xx}✓'�il.; . detection limits used in graph below 0.0 1.000.0 0.5 100.0 1.0 J a 1.5 0 O q 10.0 2.0 m c 2.5 0 1'0 3.0 3.5 4.0 0.1 Jul-99 - Jan-00 Jul-00 Jan-01 Date (monthlyear) -6 Benzene —W MTBE --f— Water Level'(ft BGS) MW-26 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lenes MTSE Water Level . (ft BGS) 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 9/20/99 13,000 27,000 2,700 13,000 12,000 5.89 730.0 1,600 500.0 12/13/99 1,400 16,000 18,000 95,000 300 nm 37,000 54,000 29,000 shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration detection limits used in graph below 100,000 _i 3.00 3.50 10,000 4.00 1,000 4.50 CK O • O 5.00 °c 100 0 5.50 10 6.00 1 i 1 6.50 Aug-99 Sep-99 Oct-99 Nov-99 Dec-99 Jan-00 _ Date (rnonbvVear) - 0 Benzene (Toluene Ethylbenzene X Xylenes—*—MTBE —0-- Water Level* (ft BGS) MW-27 Water Quality Summary, Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589. (results in ug/L) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene X lenes MTBE Water Level' (ft BGS) 1,3,5-TMB 1,2,4-TMB Naphthalene 9/20/99 7,500 1,200 1,300 4,200 21,000 9.56 330 1,000 280 12/13/99 5,800 430 1,200 5,000 16,000 6.53 190 1,100 230 5/23/00 2,000 730 730 5,690 4,080 4.95 131 1,180 390 shaded cell - not detected at or above stated concentration ;x detection limits used in graph below 100,000 3.0 4.0 10,000 X X 5.0 J O 1.000 v g C 1 e.o t; o C e 7.0 u 100 ? o u a 8.0 10 9.0 1 10.0 Aug-99 Sep-99 Oct-99 Nov-99 Dec-99 Jan-00 Feb-W Mar-00 Apr-00 May-00 Jun-00 Date (monthtyear) --*--Benzene —♦-Toluene Ethylbenzene X Xylenes —W IVITBE —6 Water Level* (ft BGS) Preliminary Cost Estimate for SVE System Installation Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589 iL ,�yiv 14..- 1.r4`,rntk{.n R:Sif�i`�✓1 RN�.i� i'!Jt:�Tt:,4. 1F� ,��... w£ �V5+1 System Design Principal 12 $55 $660 System Design Proj. Mgr 24 $50 $1,200 System Design CAD 16 $45 $720 PE Review/Stamp Sr. Engineer 8 $70 $560 Permitting/Proj. Mgmt Principal 8 $55 $440 Permitting/Proj. Mgmt Proj. Mgr 16 $50 $800 Contractor/Equipment Procurement Proj. Mgr 16 $50 $800 Administrative Admin 12 $35 $420 Extraction Well Installation/Pilot Testing Proj. Mgr 60 $50 $3,000 Extraction Well Pilot Testing Proj. Scientist 16 $40 $640 System Installation Principal 12 $55 $660 System Installation Proj. Mgr 80 $50 $4,000 System Installation Proj. Scient. 80 $40 $3,200 Treatment Shed/Doghouse Proj. Mgr 12 $45 $540 Treatment Shed/Doghouse Proj. Scient. 12 $40 $480 System Startup Proj. Mgr 48 $50 $2.400 System Startup Proj. Scient. 48 $40 $1,920 As -Built Report Preparation Proj. Scient. 28 $50 $1,400 As -Built Report Preparation CAD 8 $50 $400 As -Built Report Preparation Principal 4 $55 $220 As -Built Review Sr. Engineer 4 $70 $280 HCILaborl $24,740 . A"�� .... 3 i• { a'`FW`�',. Mileage 2000 $0.35 $700 PID Rental 20 $75 $1,500 LEL Rental 10 $75 $750 Generator & 1 HP Blower Rental (2 days) 2 $100 $200 Mag Gauges, Air Sampling Pump 10 $25 $250 Misc. Equipment Rental 1 $500 $500 Survey Equipment Rental 7 $35 $245 HCI Internal Expenses' $4,145 k �s�..���'��n'#�t, *`�,���`^ y,r �� I��q,Y+Pl�h� ��i�i.-...�.`7fiu•i+.e±i'�i'!��Yl:.."f. .�F�", . Falco 100 ! 3 HP Blower, Delivered to Site est. $26,000.00 $26.000 Treatment Compound Fencing est. $1,600 $1,600 Treatment Compound Doghouse est. $600 $600 XP Lighting/Heating est. $300 $300 PVC Piping & Fittings est. $2,000 $2,000 Poured Gravel Base for Treatment Compound est. $1.200 $1,200 Rigid Poly Insulation est. $1,000 $1,000 Sub -Total 10% Contingency Equipment, Materials & External Expenses $32,700 $3,270 $35,970 Drilling Sub -Contractor $6,500 $650 $7,150 Vapor -Phase Carbon Drum, Delivery/Disposal $1,000 $100 $1.100 Excavation Contractor $8,500 $850 $9,350 Electrical Utility $2,500 $250 $2,750 Electrical Sub -Contractor $5,000 $500 $5,500 Sub -Contractor Expense 1 $25,850 ESTIMATED TOTA 590,705 Hoffer Consulting Inc., 11/28/00 Preliminary Cost Estimate for SVE System O&M Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589 ><asktltertt f{ 1,5NOW 12ate Amount Project Management Principal 8 $55 $440 Weekly Site Visits (first 4 weeks, 6 hrs per) Proj. Mgr 24 $50 $1,200 Bi-Weekly Site Visits (48 weeks, 24 per year) Proj. Mgr 144 $50 $7,200 Unanticipated Site Visits (6 x 6 hrs per) Proj. Mgr 36 $50 $1,800 Groundwater Sampling (4 per year, 12 hrs per) Proj. Mgr 48 $50 $2,400 Groundwater Sampling (4 per year, 10 hrs per) Proj. Scient. 40 $45 $1,800 Report Preparation (4 per year, 24 hrs per) Proj. Mgr 96 $50 $4,800 Report Preparation (4 per year, 8 hrs per) CAD 32 $45 $1,440 Report Preparation (4 per year, 4 hrs per) Principal 16 $55 $880 HCI Labor $21,960 1 HCCINTERNAL EXPENSES Item Quantity Rate Amount Mileage PID Rental Mag Gauges, Air Sampling Pump Interface Probe Rental Misc. Consumables 4480 28 28 $0.35 $75 $25 $40 $300 $1,568 $2,100 $700 12 $480 $300 1 1 HCllnternal Expenses $5,148 1 EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, &'OUTSIDE EXPENSESIC Item Quantity RateRV Electricity (est. average of $750/month) 12 $750 $9,000 Equipment Repair est. $500 $500 Sub -Total 10% Contingency Equipment Materials & External Expenses $9,500 $950 $10,450 SUB -CONTRACTORS Contractprlltgm,, _ HCI Cost10% Mark Up Amount . Laboratory (GW, 24 per round x 4 rounds @ $40) $3,840 $384 $4,224 Laboratory (Air Effluent, 4 samples @ $150) $600 $60 $660 Misc. Sub -Contractors $500 $50 $550 Sub -Contractor Expense 1 $5,434 ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&MC42,992 Hoffer Consulting Inc., 11/28/00 Preliminary Cost Estimate for DPE System Installation Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589 Mt,9frlt my f.ucle �q- +' 4 i v ,v�L{ �3.t ;Y ,. NANO System Design Principal 12 $55 $660 System Design Proj. Mgr 60 $50 $3,000 System Design CAD 24 $45 $1,080 PE Review/Stamp Sr. Engineer 16 $70 $1,120 PermittinglProj. Mgmt Principal 8 $55 $440 Permitting/Proj. Mgmt Proj. Mgr 16 $50 $800 Contractor/Equipment Procurement Proj. Mgr 24 $50 $1.200 Administrative Admin 12 $35 $420 Extraction Well Installation/Pilot Testing Proj. Mgr 60 $50 $3,000 Extraction Well Pilot Testing Proj, Scientist 16 $40 $640 System Installation Principal a $55 $440 System Installation - Proj. Mgr 80 $50 $4.000 System Installation Proj. Solent. 100 $40 $4,000 Treatment Building Proj. Mgr 24 $45 $1,080 Treatment Building Proj. Scient. 24 $40 $960 System Startup Proj. Mgr 60 $50 $3,000 System Startup Proj. Scient 60 $40 $2,400 As -Built Report Preparation Proj. Scient. 40 $50 $2,000 As -Built Report Preparation CAD 16 $50 $800 As -Built Report Preparation Principal 4 $55 $220 As -Built Review Sr. Engineer 8 $70 $560 HC/ Laborl $31,820 I INTERNAL EXPENSES u Mileage 2000 $0.35 $700 PID Rental 15 $75 $1,125 LEL Rental 10 $75 $750 Mag Gauges, Air Sampling Pump 12 $25 $300 Generator & 1 HP Blower Rental (2 days) 2 $100 $200 Misc. Equipment Rental 1 $500 $500 Survey Equipment Rental 7 $35 $245 HCllnternal Expenses $3,820 Falco 100 / 3 HP Blower, Delivered to Site est. $26,000 $26.000 Skid Mounted DPE System, Delivered to Site est. $17,500 $17.500 Treatment Building est. $7,500 $7,500 XP HVAC for Treatment Building est. $3.000 $3.000 Liquid Phase GAC (3 units, delivered w/ fitters) est. $2,400 $2,400 Heavy Duty Road Boxes for DPE Wells est. $2.400 $2,400 PVC Piping & Fittings est. $2,000 $2,000 Poured Concrete Foundation for Treatment Building est $1.200 $1,200 Rigid Poly Insulation est $1,000 $1.000 Insulation/Hardware for Treatment Building mt. $500 $500 Forklift est. $500 $500 Sub -Total $64,000 10% Co 'siric'j $6,400 Equipment, Materials & External Expenses $101400 Drilling Sub -Contractor - $6,500 $650 $7,150 Vapor -Phase Carbon Drum, Deltvery/Disposal $1.000 $100 $1,100 Excavation Contractor $8,500 $850 $9,350 Electrical Sub -Contractor $15,000 $1,500 $16,500 Electrical Utility $2,500 $250 $2,750 Laboratory (Initial Discharge Samples) $840 $84 $924 Building Contractor $5,000 $500 $5,500 Sub -Contractor Expense 1 $43,274 ESTIMATED TOTAL $1d9,314 Consulting Inc., 11/28/00 Preliminary Cost Estimate for DPE System O&M Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589 U'_' .. ; % Hours Rate Amount Project Management Principal 12 $55 $660 Weekly Site Visits (first 4 weeks, 6 hrs per) Proj. Mgr 24 $50 $1,200 Bi-Weekly Site Visits (48 weeks, 24 per year) Proj. Mgr 144 $50 $7,200 Unanticipated Site Visits (6 x 6 hrs per) Proj. Mgr 36 $50 $1,800 Groundwater Sampling (4 per year, 12 hrs per) Proj. Mgr 48 $50 $2,400 Groundwater Sampling (4 per year, 10 hrs per) Proj. Scient. 40 $45 $1,800 Report Preparation (4 per year, 24 hrs per) Proj. Mgr 96 $50 $4,800 Report Preparation (4 per year, 8 hrs per) CAD 32 $45 $1,440 Report Preparation (4 per year, 4 hrs per) Principal 16 $55 $880 HC/Labor 1 $22,180 I VINTERNALEXPENSES eDiv WN =. t�se Qua ntity Rate Amount Mileage 4480 $0.35 $1,568 PID Rental 28 $75 $2,100 Mag Gauges, Air Sampling Pump 28 $25 $700 Interface Probe Rental 12 $40 $480 Misc. Consumables 1 $300 $300 HC/ Internal Expenses I $5,148 I EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS,& OUTSIDE EXPENSES`'' �+ ,c ; •,` 111?'� na,:,x� s r •' Quantity Electricity (est. average of $1200/month) 12 $1,200 $14,400 Replacement Carbon (4 @ $550) 4 $550 $2,200 Equipment Repair est. $1,000 $1,000 Sub -Total 10%Contingency Equipment, Materials & External Expenses $17,600 $1,760 $19,360 } :,,w h""•"_ p r ''• SUB-CONTRACTORS, s NO'. Contractorllteix���'� 1+ HCI Cost 10%° Mark Up _ Amount Laboratory (GW Analyses & Effluent), 100 samples/year, $40/per $4,000 $400 $4,400 Misc. Sub -Contractors $500 $50 $550 Sub -Contractor Expense $4,950 ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M $51,638 Consulting Inc., 11/28/00 Preliminary Cost Estimate for MOBILE DPE System Option Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589 ;t Management ction Well Installation/Pilot Testing ction Well Pilot Testing Stack Evaluation/Engineering/Monitc Rental fey Equipment Rental t Stack - Misc. Rentals g Sub -Contractor Stack - Sub -Contractor 2 $55 75'Prin 60 J]LLst 20 Proj. Mgr 16 HCI Laborl $4,710 D420]$.35L$225 7535100 HCl Internal Expenses $507 $6,500 $650 $7,150 $1,200 $120 $1,320 Sub -Contractor Expense $8,470 ESTIMATED TOTAL $13,687 Hoffer Consulting Inc., 11/28/00 Preliminary Cost Estimate for MOBILE DPE System O&M Shelburne Road Mobil North, So. Burlington, VT, SMS Site #94-1589 Project Management Principal 8 $55 $440 Monthly DPE Visits, Coordination/Mgmt (2 hrs per) Proj. Mgr 24 $50 $1,200 Monthly DPE Visits, On -Site (10 hrs per) Proj. Mgr 120 $50 $6,000 Groundwater Sampling (4 per year, 12 hrs per) Proj. Mgr 48 $50 $2,400 Groundwater Sampling (4 per year, 10 hrs per) Proj. Scient. 40 $45 $1,800 Report Preparation (4 per year, 16 hrs per) Proj. Mgr 64 $50 $3,200 Report Preparation (4 per year, 8 hrs per) CAD 32 $45 $1,440 Report Preparation (4 per year, 4 hrs per) Principal 16 $55 $880 HCI Labor $17,360 K ` Mileage (12 HEAT visits, 4 GW visits, @ 140 miles) 2240 $0.35 $784 PID Rental (12 HEAT visits, 4 GW visits) 16 $75 $1,200 Interface Probe Rental (12 HEAT visits, 4 GW visits) 16 $40 $640 Misc. Consumables 1 $300 $300 HCI Internal Expenses 1 $2,924 1 yt�7f�1��,•!T 'v13"Y yd.t is.. �. ._� it ..? a$'� N-.. 2 ..9.+m .?b. xF� k.", 't,F.',Y ..", >Zr3t r xOE1�aCtOr�tQrYt_ „s r�' _FrGI0°�o-lGletr1 Alptount Y ry HEAT Contractor - $3,600 per visit ($1100 mob', $2500 day rate) $43,200 $4,320 $47,520 Five Drums (assume < 250 gallons water per visit), transport/disposal, $250/drum $15.000 $1,500 $16,500 assumes $2100 mob is split with one other site Sub -Contractor Expense $64,020 ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M Hoffer Consulting Inc., 11/28/00 February 11, 2003 Mr. Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Construction at 977 Shelburne Rd. Dear Ray, SBCollins,inc. 54 Lower Welden Street PO. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 802 527-0116■893-7744 Fax 527-01 15 Thank you for the information concerning soil piles at our site. As I understand it, since we have a construction permit for this site, soil piled and poly -encapsulated can be on site for an extended time period to meet State of Vermont requirements without a special permit from your office. Our intentions would be to minimize both the soil pile size and the storage time, to the extent possible without compromising state regulations. We would also have to be careful not to obstruct the road right-of-way across the property, and keep the pile covered and surrounded by barrier fence. The exact circumstances will become known when excavation begins and I will deal with any contaminated soils in a manner acceptable to both City and State requirements. Thank you very much. Sincerely, S.B. Collins, Inc. ellxte.%- ��_ Carl Ruprecht Construction Manager Distributor of Petroleum Products CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONE14G 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 7, 2003 Wayne Lawson Jolley Associates FO Box 671 5t. Albans, Vermont 05475 Re: Escrow Agreement, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lawson: Please be advised that the City hereby release you from your obligation to maintain $695.00 within an escrow account for the above referenced property. It io my understanding that these funds are being held under Certificate #5333012785. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. 5incerely,; 14ymmn �, Belaur' Administrative Officer SITE PLAN ESCROW AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, executed in triplicate by and between JOLLEY ASSOCIATES , hereinafter referred to as Developer", the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, hereinafter referred to as "Municipality", and the VERMONT NATIONAL BANK , hereinafter referred to as "Bank". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has received site plan approval from the MUNICIPALITY'S Planning Commission for the development of property located at 977 SHELBURNE ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON , as depicted on a site plan entitled " ", dated and prepared by WHEREAS, Developer is required by said approval, at its own expense, to complete certain improvements; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement wish to establish an escrow account to secure the obligations of the Developer as set forth in the City approval; and WHEREAS, the Bank executes this Agreement solely in the capacity of escrow agent. NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. DEVELOPER will, at its own expense, complete the following construction as depicted and in accordance with the specifications set forth in said site plan and related documents: 2. The Developer shall complete the improvements set forth in Paragraph one no later than ALREADY COMPLETED; 8/12/98 3. DEVELOPER shall replace or repair any defective or improper work or materials which may be recognized within three (3) years after completion of the improvements set forth in Paragraph one. For the purpose of this Agreement "completion" shall be deemed to have occurred when the MUNICIPALITY has inspected and approved the construction of all the improvements required by this Agreement and issued written notice to the DEVELOPER that the construction is complete. 4. For the guaranty of Developer's performance of all requirements hereinabove set forth, and prior to the issuance of any zoning permit for JOLLEY ASSOCIATES , Developer and Bank agree that the sum of 695.00 shall be set aside and held in escrow by the Bank 1 and shall be available for payment to the Municipality in accordance with the terms herein set forth. 5. If the Municipality shall file with the Bank a statement that the Developer is in the judgement of Municipality in default under the terms of this Agreement, the Bank shall from time to time pay monies from said escrow fund to the Municipality, in amounts not to exceed a total enabling the Municipality to complete improvements and requirements set forth in this Agreement. 6. The Municipality will promptly submit to the Developer a copy of such statement as it files with the Bank. The consent of the developer to such payment by the Bank to the Municipality shall not be required. The Bank shall incur no liability to the Developer on account of making such payment to the Municipality, nor shall the Bank be required to inquire into the propriety of any claim by the Municipality of default on the part of the Developer or into the use of such funds by the Municipality in completing such improvements. 7. The Municipality shall not file with the Bank a statement of default until thirty (30) days after notice has been sent by it to the Developer by certified mail, return receipt requested, setting forth its intention to do so. 8. All monies released by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to paragraph five (5) shall be used by the Municipality solely for the purpose of performing obligations imposed upon the Developer by that portion of this Agreement upon which the Developer is then in default. Any work to be performed by the Municipality pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis or shall be performed by the Municipality with its own work force and equipment or shall be accomplished in such manner as in the judgement of the Municipality shall accomplish the work most expeditiously and economically. 9. If monies are released by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to paragraph five (5) and it shall later develop that a portion of the released monies are surplus to the Municipality's needs, any such surplus shall be refunded by the Municipality to the Bank to be held and distributed by the Bank pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 10. The Bank will not refuse or delay to make such payments to the Municipality when requested by the Municipality by the appropriate statement, and Developer will not interfere with or hinder such payments by the Bank to the Municipality. Said statement shall contain a certificate of compliance with the notice requirements of paragraph seven (7) of this Agreement. 11. This Agreement shall terminate and shall be of no force or effect upon performance of all requirements contemplated hereby, and the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph three (3) . 12. The sum of shall be maintained in escrow until certification to the Bank by the Municipality of the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph three (3) . E 13. This Agreement shall not only be binding upon the parties hereto, but also their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. Dated at this day of U f , 1997 DOPER'S NAME) By: , Duly Aut orized gen ,� Dated at this day of _ �� /GI_ 199 CITY q� Wi ne Witness Dated at �) this day of (., ' OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 1 ! I Duly A1u' orized A ont , 199 `;?' (NAME OF BANK - 3RD PARTY) i ess By: Witness Duly Authorized Agent 3 For account information, call BIL (Bank Information Line) at 1-800-884-3643. Member FDIC Receipt an Q Equal Housing lender Thank you for banking with us. Vermont National Bank 92 5639 08181998 1439 CREDIT $b95.00 3990012783 ST ALBARS 8039 NBD indicates Next Business Day. This Receipt is issued subject to an audit of deposit and all items which are credited subject to final payment. LANDSCAPE REVIEW S. B Collins Shelburne Road 1. Little leaf linden and some maples are both overplanted in South Burlington. Some alternative species include: Turkish filbert Skymaster English oak Silver linden Kentucky coffee treet Heritage River birch JLrF . MOTION OF APPROVAL 12/3/02 JOLLEY ASSOCIATES, I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve site plan application # SP-02-54 and conditional use application #CU-02-25 of Jolley Associates to amend a site plan for a 1300 sq. ft. convenience store with gas sales. The request is for permission to: 1) raze an existing 1,300 sq. ft. convenience store building, and 2) construct a new 6375 sq. ft.(2125 sq. ft. in basement area) convenience store/deli on a lot developed with a 3264 sq. ft. gas pump island canopy and four (4) gas pumps (eight (8) fueling positions) and one (1) diesel pump (two (2) fueling positions), 977 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a one (1) page plan, entitled "S. B. Collins Shelburne Road Site Plan-50' x85' Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont", as prepared by Schreib Engineering, Inc., dated 11/6/02, with a revised date of 11/18/02, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The site plan shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval by the Director of Planning and Zoning (hereinafter Director). Three (3) copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director prior to permit issuance. a. The site plan shall be revised to show the rear yard setback requirement for the C1 District as 30 feet, both on the plan and in the notes. b. The site plan shall be revised to show the changes requested by the city arborist regarding tree species selection. c. The site plan shall be revised to show water and sewer services to the building. 3) All exterior display or storage of merchandise is prohibited. 4) The applicant shall comply with all requests of the Fire Department including: 1) installation of the necessary fire alarms, 2) provisions for an emergency key box, location specified by the SBFD, and 3) compliance with all requirements of the Vermont Department of Labor and Industry. 5) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall provide cut sheets for both existing and proposed exterior light fixtures. All exterior light fixtures must be downcasting and shielded and approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning prior to installation. 6) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $9150 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 7) For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the convenience store expansion will generate zero (0) additional trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 8) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 9) The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer before use of the new structure. 10) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. South Burlington Fire Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4110 Douglas S. Brent, Fire Chief November 26, 2002 Ms. Juli Beth Hoover, Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Jolley Associates Shelburne Road Dear Juli: I have reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of the proposed gas station/convenience store on Shelburne Road. I have also made a site visit to try to envision the siting of this project. The preliminary plans seem to be OK and I have the following recommendations: 1. Compliance with all requirements of Vermont Labor and Industry Fire Prevention Division codes and standards. 2. Installation of the necessary fire alarms required for an occupancy such as this. 3. Provide an emergency key box, location to be specified by SBFD. At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves forward additional items may surface which could be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the developer and Labor and Industry. Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact me. t ely, 9,z Douglas S. Brent Fire Chief CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTIe/IENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 19, 2002 Steven Smith Jolley Associates 1'0 Box 671 5t. Albans, Vermont 05475 Re: Convenience Store Expansion, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision issued by the Development Review board on 12/17/02 with regards to the above referenced matter. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please let me know. 5incer0y, R ymo d J. belair Administrative Officer Encl. Certified Mail Receipt #7002 0510 0001 5466 0944 is car. WASHER/DRYER Hot- morons. Letters of rote- TQ98"Y Taurus se- Putinimui'n wage rates and ApplicattonsEngineers — REPRESENTATIV CARPENTER 899- point. Approx. 10 years rest and Qualification *CARPENTER* FT public employment laws `� Statements must be re Power win- old. Free if you remove, are applicable. Federal 602 985-9930. calved on or before Fri- casae a PLUS ( ) wage rotas apply to position. M With & trim All level 1 g possess excellent pi E-m�. experience. Year round. skills US. WASHERS AND DRYER white Taurus wa- this day, November 22, contract .(Davis -Bacon 2002. All contact gon, 89K, power lock- +/ and have I m, Call (802) 878.8819 recruit advanteatcom. entry experience. H @ 2 heavy duty washers �. and dryer and Act applies). Buy Ame- questions should be ad- s/windows, cassette rica Provisions shall e_ CARPET INSTALLATION are M-F 8:30 to 5:00 AON INSURANCE Salary I a rposition CREW, Professional gas Kenmore. You pick up. good (Kenmore). p P• 1995 green E350 Club- p dressed to H.P. Cum- we on15 ass. van, ply' ALL BIDDERS shall mings, Attegtfon: Mike gg p be included on the Ver- MANAGERS car- Y Captive Insurance pet installation. crew benefits. Fax resume 655-5526 Must Call (802) 899-4913 Hulbert. 108K mont Agency of Tran- needed for top quail in- (802) or Accountants quality to: Portamedic, home. WATERBED FRAME. Dark 2000 green Dodge Ram, sportation's List of Pre- stallations. Local Willis. 20 i Due to growth, a leading ton Canal Street, Winoc details wood. Queen size. Good Minority and Women 15 pass. van 4UK, cos• qualified Contractors. company. Call (802) captive management 862-2788. VT05404 condition. Just don't Owned Businesses are sette ALL BIDDERS will be re- firm has 2 openings. Fe Bull have the space. Ask for encouraged to apply. Very well maintained, quird to sign an anti -col- ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE/ CASNIER- FT Mon -Fri 6FGroqmed, ve, in Dana. (802) 655.6238 Sold as is, no war lesion statement. SR ACCOUNT MNOR: am - 2pm. Apply in per -CUSTOMER tees or guarantees im- Home WOOD STOYS, Good H.P. Cummings Cons plied, sealed bid due b Dated November 14, 20- small condition. Great for pony Y tBox Candidates should have son at Simon's store atSALES, a Bachelors degree in 974 Shelburne Rd, South, Neatly a PO 69 cam . You ick u . Call November 6, 2002. 02 P p Accounting and possess Burlington. , Positivewith E RACKp strong organizational 3 (802)4766171. UVM reserves the ri ht Wo03-7 7-NH03785 g T/ 603-747-3303 to accept or reject any David Spitz, Municipal and& ommunication skills CHAMPLAINFARMSOUSE,Prater 5 STOVE. Performer model 28. Good condi- bid. Pa ment in cash or Pro ect Mana er F/603-747-3854 Y 1 g E-mail: bank check at time FT/PT cashiers andTON With the ability to workhad I de ende Previous Asst.ManaggerinBurling-Please PY' tion. Works great. Rated for wood andcoaLYou mhulbert@ of h cummin s.com vehicle pick up. November 16, 17; P g A ' Linda, 656-1381, a p t i v e m a n a g e m e n t ton area 864-1519 exG8-1023 x CPA 351 apply online at:DATA haul it, you can have it. for 18,2002 appt. to view. �r.ianceand a h ENTRY CLERN �Pwww.champlainfarms.comdoors sltion a plus. erma- Fineforahome,deer half camp or workshop. EDE Oat Foun Duties include data ad- COUNTANT: Candl- CDLDRIVER t phones and general �afmust have at ford ry drywall boom are (802)656-7744 November 16, ]7, 18, N o v e` m b e r FOUND CAT Black and 19, 20, 21, & 22, 2002 a wall truck. Off ice, duties.Approx.20 minimum an associates Apply in person at 25 hours/wk. Williston good WOOD STOVE Works L S 0' ' vary well, iron 1 a,15,16,17,18,19, & 20, White, Long Haired, In degree in accounting, be Don -Vac, Blair Park Rd, area. Must be reliable. PUBLIC HEARING 2002 Colchester, 11/15. attentive to detail end be Williston. Call Byron y .elated cast .and sheet metal with blower. on Refs. req. Send resume team -oriented. Previous at 802 SOUTH BURLINGTON Call (802) 985-2248 ( 878-5006 to: Burlington Free Pres; You pick u Cell 802 lease p' ( p DEVELOPMENT WiLLISTON ROUTE 2A captive management P.O. Box 10 Burlington TRANSPORTATION FOUND CAT, Large. gray experience a plus. 985 2247. 4 REVIEW BOARD cat. Near St. Paul St. In PATH Resume &references to v VT05402Attn: Free _ Male; ;FREE TOOOODNOME ONLY AKC, Papers Burlin ton on 11/10. Call The .South Berlin ton STP DIKE t42(S g g (802) 985-2248. Pall Pallito "E B F Press Box #214 ittler Aki- te,SYears0ld.Swee Development Review TOWN OF FOUND CAT, Medium Board gg Aon Insurance Mana ors * * * * * * * 7 76St.PaulSt.,Ste.500, (802i test thing in the whole (802) world."Teddy Bear" will hold a public WILLISTON, VERMONT length, hair, tiger, and hearing at the South Bur- CHILDCARE Full time Burlington, VT 05401 DATA ENTRY AONisEDE. Floating position with — 802-598-6509 white. In Colchester on lington City Hall, Confer- ante Room, 575 Dorset 11/09, Call (802) 985- children 6 weeks - 7. OPERATOR AUTOMOTIVE OD ODt On Street,' South. Burlington, ADVERTISEMENT 2248• FOR BIDS years. Education and Tire &Wheel experience preferred. High volume .invoice Vermont on Tuesday, FOUND DOG Technicians needed. Call Crystal434-3891. try, ten -key speed w A CARING CHILDLESS December 3, 2002, at Female Husk In In Col- 7:30 P.M.. The Town of Willis- chesteronI1h5Calf Due to increase in bus.- accuracy a must. Sho ness, Tire Warehouse be Two Couple seeks infant to to consider the following: ton is accepting BIDS for (802)986.2248 1 i�� +t versatile and prc has immediate openings cient in office v- join our family through adoption. adoption. We can help the construction of a transportation path adja- FOUND — Iar!e,'fte, 1. Application #CU-02- .functre in our South Burlington CHILDCARE Infant, and have a good att( location. Must bereli- toddler and preschool lion 4o detail with medical and legal 1. Please cent to VT Route 2A male black and .white 54 of Jolley Associates puppy. In Colchester on between Positi able, self -motivated and positions available in a requires taking prods high Sam end Free seeking conditional use River Cove Roadve in 11/0 Call (802) 985- a proval under S t' 2248 able to followinstruc- quality .expanding orders over the phor lions. Experience help- Program. Education and The work schedule is 1. 3_ (866)-213.4971 ) ec ,on the Town of Williston. .05, Conditional Uses, ful, but will train. Excel- X 80 ANIMAL CRACKERS mad, Teddy Bears, goodnight FOUND DOG Male. Gar- of the South Burlington Sealed BIDS will be man Shepherd in WI- zoning regulations. lent starting pay. Advancement opportuni- I, U kisses, bedtime prayers. Happy, outgoing received .by the Town, of nooskl, on 11/11. Call Request is for permis• Williston at the Town 9852248 ties available. Apply at: Tire Warehouse, couple 968, desires a newborn to sign to: 1) raze an exist- Public Works Department FOUND DOG mg 1300 sq. ft. convent- Office 7878 MaleSharpei,InCol- 919 Shelburne Rd. Mon.-Fri.-6pm. i g e loye and share our happy i in home. Cali Veronica & et Williston once store building, and Road, Williston, Vermont chaster on 11/15 Call 2) construct a new 4224 until. 2:00 Sat. 8am-2pm. wlho Rlch(888)4036862. p.m. local (802)985-2248 on aft lot develapedewstith re time, on Wednesday, FOUND DOG' on Sat. December AUTO SALES Fltzpatrlck's Buick-GMC this araae a es 527- ESSEX JCT 3264 sq. ft gas pump is- 1 1, 20 0 2 11/9 on Bixby Hill Road land canopy and four (4) when BIDS shall be. in Essex Jct, . Small, opened and has an opportunity for a motivated, self reliant in- Tag Sale! — Sat. 11/16, ONE day gas pumps (eight (g publicly read white dog. Cell (802) fueling aloud. 879-1146. dividual to sell top quality new & used vehicles. ONLY1 1 Town Market. positions) a(8 Experienced f F, 8-5. We offer comf titive wages and a grE benefit package. Apl in person or send r sume to: PEPSI-COLA BOTTING COMPANY 20 Karen Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Attn: Lisa LeGrand one (1 diesel pump YIe) Place, Sizle Wilson Rd., 2 fuelin g Positions), (two The Town of Willis- FOUND2STRAYCATS 977 One, White, pre .erred, but not required. If CHILDCARE Preschool 8 am - 4 m. Furniture, Shelburne Road. ton intends to issue a W/ Orange you're looking for a long teacher, exper/educ', pre - household household items, vinyl o I d records, clothes, tapes. 2. Final NOTICE OF AWARD on Patches. Other One February 1, 2003 and the Orange Striped. Found in term career, we'd like to talk, with you. Call John ferred. Professional ctr, competitive salary. EOE plat apppplication SO BURLINGTN Multi #SD•02-70 of Pillsbury NOTICE TO PROCEED Queen City Park Area: Call For More Info. Patch {�' 802-658-4221 - 802-879-2736. DELIVERY/WAREHOUSi calf on April 15, 2003. The Call family sale. Indoors. Manor to amend a prevl- CONTRACT will b (802) 658-4991 to sche7u{e a confiden- tial interview. CHILDCARE TEACHER PERSON, Must be abl Lots of goodies. 64 Swift ously approved plat 7= St.10am-3pm, Fri.& Sat. s(sting of 68 units e con- awarded based on the LOST PIN, Gold Oa m. of g p •Large Center: Team Approach. to do heavy lifting. Mu; have not S 0, S U R L 1 N G T 0 N congregate housing g in lowest responsive ice Open - 'cut design. Lost and a firm fixed -price on Fri. Nov. 1; near 222 DOASETST, ACROSS FROM U MALL 41NAEYCAccredited. ggood driving recon (802)651-8900 Call two 2 Moving to Maui Salel d buildings. 4-drawer office desk, amendment consists eith- The award will be made m er TGI Fridays; North of •2yrolds Low ratios DENTAL HYGIENIST _ nice, cream -colored' constructing an sq. n 2 $10couch, wrltIng to the lowest res. Ave., or Church St. It ponsive and responsible SENTIMENTAL For Degree/experience pre- Comprehensive dentE looking tr . 10 couch, $200, 5. Can. accessory structure, Info., call 802 864-4495 to Baby Carrier, .$15. Can-,1530Williston Road. BIDDER. ( 1 tarred Competitive petitive salary 8benefits. practice for tear oriented person. Medfct ase Trail- a bike trailer, $20: the Bo lions saref LOST RING Yellow/Gold Each BID shall be ring.Has initials WW + + F1tiCk.S 802-482.2525 & other great benefit; Call Patty (802) 658-1108 — Hoop/poke, $4�, sl available Y books, washer, dr er, Public inspection at Y foraccompanied by a certi- FA engraved inside of it. fied check mad a able the p y 2. bands" sautered into,,e;;;g��,chD1Lp„ to the Town I311ICW-ar-Ac CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENATIVE/ DINNER .LINE COOKS F1 year round: 2 yrs expo more. Sat. of Williston one. Has diamond. Fart1i- 0 South Burlington City for five percent (5%) of ly heirloom. Possibly f (1 00, eo2-6sa-4222 ADMINSTRATIVE in fine dining req. Mus RainorShine,: pli- Stonehedge Dr. (off lost the total amount of the in Hannaford parking lot, ASSISTANT be. able to work all sta tions. Exper. w/Europesl me S ear St. g Swift St.) DBurlington hairman BID. A BID BOND may Milton. Please ' call With be usd in lieu of a certi- any info. (802) 893-3416. EARTEND! Full-time position cuisine a plus EOE (8o2I 860 6256of South check. BARTENDING SCHOOL available to assist the Triiipp vamily lodge _fled WILLISTON Moving sale! Development Review Watch your business OF NEW ENGLAND customer service de - ER, Furniture and household Board !ed grow. Advertise in our A Labor & Materi• daily "Services" Certification/Trainino partment . in respond- ing to subscriber PO Box 1428 Rams. All in excellent led condition Shown b November 16, 2002 Di. als BOND with a Ccmpl.• rector v• Call 658.3321 Job Assistance 1.888-4DRINKS and carrier requests. Ad- q Stowe, vT 05672 Fax: 802-253-5757, 79- Y a pointment. Call p once BOND each ,in an or 1.800.427.3125. www.bartendin school.com 9 REQUEST FOR amount equal to one 108Church St.Burlington ditional responsibifl- ties include adminis- ( 02) 879 1787 in BIDS; hundred percent (100%) LOST WEDDING RING, MOWING AND LAND of the base contract New bride lost wedding BEN FITS ADMINISTRA- trative support to de - partment managers. ee. eqa of Cos for ring.Husband's rand- TOR All as acts of grand. MAINTENANCE price will be required. mther's for Prior customer ser- all CONSTRUCTION BIDS will be valid for a ring pension plans con- period of sixty down. Heartbroken. Lost sulting business. Mail Pe 'dY (�) days. vice experience :re - quired. Must be profi- PROJECT NOTICE TO SUBCONTRACTORS at or near Bon Ton: Om resume/sale to EBAS The Town of Charlotte is The OWNER shall have Hercules ld 3 eient with Excel; nth- 'expert- ND SUPPLIE formally soliciting bids the right to reject any or diamonds; much bhistor ,d chester, VT 05446 Fax for the mowing all bids. Y or computer once is helpful. Must and g Reward for return. Call to (802) 655-1904 E-mail maintenance of certain TheCONTRA (802)878.8803. mybenefrts@mindspring. be able to work every other S d M — H.P. CummingsTown lands. Site walk CT Cons- scheduled for Fridayy DOCUMENTS may be REWARD For The Safe- dm un a ning. Y or- DISPATCHER/ ADMINIS. November 22nd at 10% examined at the follow- Return Of Linus, A Male BRANCH MANAGER TRATIVE ASST. needed a.m. beginning at the ing locations during nor- Siamese Cat, Lost In Leading flooring distribu- The Burlington Free to coordinate rides and Charlotte Town Hall. mal working hours: LeddyPark /Shore Rd. for seeks retail Branch Press offers a com- 'assist with administra- Bids will be due no later Area Of Burlington. 10/11 Manager for Williston, VT prehensive benefits tive tasks for a unique than Monday, December Williston Town Call (802) 652-4027 Even location. _Flooring .Indus- package including transportation program r1 wft � 1WIT2nd by d m r nor na Public Works (809) 656.4086 Days try experience preferred. 401 (k), medical, den- for low-income people. City Engineer Comments 11/5/02 James and Dorothy Hardy 1. Drive to lot #2 is approximately 400 ft in length. It should be at least 18 ft in width for two way traffic. There should also be a turnaround at its end. 2. Size of service mainly water and sewer should be noted on the plan. 3. Site plan should include contours and method of handling stormwater runoff and basement drains. '1C S. B. Collins Shelburne Road 1. Water and sewer services tones buildings should be shown on the site plan. Meadowland Industrial Park Hinesburg Road 1. The temporary access drive should be at least 8 inches of gravel. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO December 3, 2002 MEETING The proposed structure does not meet the PRD perimeter setback of 50 feet. The Board may modify this requirement if the request is in accordance with the conditions and objectives of Section 9.404 of the zoning regulations. The applicant could eliminate the need for the PRD perimeter setback by increasing the size of lot #2 to at least 0.5 acres, which would avoid the need to apply under the PRD provision. City Engineer: The City Engineer requests: 1) an 18 foot wide paved access to lots #1 and #2, 2) the size of service for water and sewer noted on the plan, 3) contour information in five (5) foot intervals, 4) method of handling stormwater runoff, and 5) the location of basement drains (see enclosed). Parking: The minimum parking requirement is seven (7) spaces. The plan shows eight (8) parking spaces. 5) AND 6) JOLLEY ASSOCIATES, RECONSTRUCTION OF CONVENIENCE STORE, 977 SHELBURNE ROAD This project consists of amending a site plan for a 1300 sq. ft. convenience store with gas sales. The request is for permission to: 1) raze an existing 1,300 sq. ft. convenience store building, 2) construct a new 6375 sq. ft.(2125 sq. ft. is basement area) convenience store/deli on a lot developed with a 3264 sq. ft. gas pump island canopy and four (4) gas pumps (eight (8) fueling positions) and one (1) diesel pump (two (2) fueling positions). The Board reviewed this project at their 3/19/02 meeting to approve filling. This property located at 977 Shelburne Road lies within the C 1 District. It is bounded on the north by the K-Mart Shopping Plaza, on the east by Shelburne Road, on the west and by flannaford's, and on the south by Burger King. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA The proposed project complies with the stated purpose of the Commercial 1 District, "to encourage the location of general retail and office uses in a manner that serves as or enhances a compact central business area," and does not adversely affect: a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities- no effect expected. b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor the ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses- no effect expected. c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity -no effect expected. d) Bylaws in effect- no effect expected. e) Utilization of renewable energy resources -no effect expected. fj General public health and welfare -no effect expected. SITE PLAN CRITERIA 0 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO December 3, 2002 MEETING Access/circulation: Access is via two (2) 36 foot wide curb cuts off Shelburne Road. No change is proposed. Circulation on site is adequate. Coverage/setback: The proposed building coverage is 5.57%; up from 1.71% (maximum allowed is 30%). The proposed overall coverage is 45.96%; up from 39.6% (maximum allowed is 70%). The proposal includes a reduction in front yard coverage to 55.2%, down from 58.9% (maximum allowed is 30%). The proposed building meets the required minimum setbacks. The plan indicates the rear setback requirement is 15 feet. This is not correct, the rear setback in the C 1 District is 30 feet. Dum sp ters: The plan shows an enclosed dumpster storage area. Parkin: The minimum parking requirement is 20 spaces. The plan shows 20 spaces including one accessible space. The plan shows a bike rack. Landsc4ping: The minimum landscaping requirement based on building cost is $9150. The proposal meets the requirement. The plantings include lilac, arborvitae, little leaf linden and junipers. The city arborist reviewed the proposal and stated that little leaf lindens and some maples are overplanted in South Burlington. He suggested some alternate species. These include turkish filbert, english oak, silver linden and others (see comments). Lighting: The applicant should provide details (cut sheets) for all existing and proposed exterior light fixtures and show their location on the plan. All proposed light fixtures must be downcasting and shielded and must be approved by the Director prior to installation. Other: It has been the Board's policy to prohibit outside storage and display at convenience stores. Staff recommends a condition prohibiting any outside storage or display. Traffic Review: The number of fueling positions is used to estimate the number of vehicle trip end's. The application before the Board does not include an increase in the number of pumps or fueling positions. Therefore, no additional traffic expected. 7) RETROVEST, 310 UNIT PLANNED RESIIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, SPEAR STREET This project consists of a planned residential development consisting of 310 single and multi -family units on 242 acres, and a 35 acre working farm. This project was continued LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE — EXISTING & PROPOSED OM"INC PR��O''POSED TYPE SIZE QUANTITY LILAC 1 CAL 6 © ARBORVITAE 1 GAL 4 O BARBERRY 1 CAL. 6 O Q ROCK 2 X 4 2 F BURNING BUSH 1 CAL 6 JUNIPER 1 CAL 19 e DECIDUOUS SHRUB 1 GAL 6 O SALT TOL. MAPLE OR LITTLE LEAF LINDEN 2-1/2' TO 3' CAL 6 l.Am-LR1T A• D.B./ ✓UST�R D�'!'BlOP.l�fii'1' RICOI'! llff P/!:I J// SOUTiYI.,1ND 6�►'T�RPRlS6S RECEIVED Nov 19 2002 City of So. Burlington PROPlR17'G� x�N,►,�.�vRDs P.D. BOl /AAO HZellycM Ail N/A/ PVlz" /L1I war //J MUKULK rlivu GRAPHIC SCALE 20 f0 0 20 40 .o so 100 LEGEND — — RRORERTY UNE — — — RIOMT—Of—WAY CUq E POWER lli ..««.««.� ««...««.. LIONT —•� SILT FENCE E10STING OONTWR US-- NS— MS — CMS1 O 4UNIORA.L SEWER — . — . — - — . — - — - — — ZONNO SETAWc Q 0 a CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit Number �o- APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Type of application check one: ( ) Appeal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation) (Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( } Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY). WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING? 1) OWNER OF RECORD ame as shown on deed, mailing 5`/ Lwf-r phone and fax #) ( 517—ulit., 4-a..L (vro)1 - 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 13 r- 37 � Pax (n I Jo 3 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Ju �Uy As So(.lu,�tl 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) stAh� iRs A6y-c- 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 91 7 ,S46-, 6) TAB PARCEL 1D # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) �0 � L __ �g 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and w 5A of each separate use)�o b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) C,NvCni-Cr•c.._ Sire k-ii [30.JL ! cc e 422.q <; -(4 c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings tolremain) Ake,— S 6,4- sq 0 d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Q r4_ E j u v r e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Al, A- . f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) 3 C1 k-wc-c- i , o f4-t sa- 1 10 Nor, o -(f-X L.Q_ Z g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing ,-7 i % Proposed S-S 7 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 3 J • (, % Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed % (does not apply to residential uses) 9 u 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping: $ 1 �, 0 J 0, Uz) c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: -efci(t-, (��'� ��. i (�. C�-tkfn�, ,-\ 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14) LIST ABUTTERS ( List names and addresses of all abutting property owners on a separate sheet of paper). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. x7a� � &A IN 1 Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning c& Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date A Adjacent Property owners Juster Development Corp. Southland Ent. URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY A JOINTINPI'IATIVI; RF'1'WCF.N THE VT DEPARTMENT OP POREs,rs, PARRS & RECREATION AND UVM EXTENSION — L.4+ E 2, ` SkywaSkc L` l�s� bai� 0(:c,tc405 c�b�rc • -') c 3) -5t 1jr-4 L, T, I:a 4ovwtcJ4`>q , R 1 user 5 i c-c�l t r3e4J 1a A" www.vtcommunityforestry.org 802-223-2389 S IT1' ,UF S O-UTH BUFL-Is T fGT DF,PA L:1V1E1`IT ,GF PLAV`.iNU1TG �Ao Z0NE1,4G 575 DOR.SET STF=T SO= BURLLNGT01 T, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit Number SP- - PLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in fiA. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) Obi iEIR OF RECORD (Naine as shown on mailing address, phone and fax #) Z\ <27-011 c' 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 7� `7 X P!c (�, t -(0-3 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Sc, �i,►` �j� �, 4) ,CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) S-ky-e- S,i-,tit, S P,1-\ E- Pt S A 6z-- v-e - 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS.------ 7 S . 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) V SV O - GOS 7 7- C, 7) PROJECT DESCIRIPTION - 3)F o.st:g Uses on Propertyinciuding description and size of each separate use) v L'o) Proposed Uses on ,property (include description and size g each new use and existing use to remain) + C e�v-e AI-E 1 LL S tU -L w / Lxz� � Qk l S kv-,e- 9 2 2 _ .� c) Total building square footage on buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building ,& number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Q 'F Ov r e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) T f) Number of employees & company jieliicleS (e cisting and proposed, note office versus non-otrce employees) g) Other (list any other information pertinent z bus application not speci.f-ifrequested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): g) LOT COVEIUGE a) $ Existin& I .'7 / % Proposed ,S % b) Overall (building, patiking, outside storage, etc) Eodstina 3 , % Proposed LIS.i4o % c) Front yard ` -(along each st, en°% Proposed 5 s . 2- g/n 9) COST ESTDAATES 00 a) $adding (including interior renovations): ') Landscaping: S% S. (icz,O Other site improvements (please list :vith cost): 10) :ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily trafik for entire property (in and oast): 'o) .-1\/t. Peak hour for entire ;property (in and out). c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (1n and out): 11) PE.A K HOURS OF OPERATION: e" -i �, ,r t J c`f -kj 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION:_��y 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) ieguiar size Copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shallbe paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A ). i hereby ccrtil;r that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my kmowledge. Do not write below this line DATE OF SUB1b1ISSION-. REVIEW ACTTHOR1T` 41 Development Review Board ❑ Director, Plamning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: 1-7 Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of iD or Designee Date t t-a- AV � J U� L l �Dcs�nz�c�" -M Boa � Zd ANDSCAPF SCHEDULE SYM. 1. S= QUANTITY DECIDUOUS 0S11.6 2 OAl_ 22 ,,,...(B DECIDUOUS TM 1-1/r DIA S 8.74 M.PIi 3 ARBORVITAE 1 GAL 6 O BARBERRY 1 GAL, 4 0 ROCK 2 X 4 2 OBURNING BU 1 GAL 4 LANDSCAPE SCHEDLTlz - ISLAND SYu. TYPE SIZE QUANTITY LILAC 1 GAL 3 © ARBORVITAE 1 GAL 6 O BARBERRY 1 GAL 11 O ROCK 2 X 4 2 F BURNING BUSH 1 GAL 10 SALT TOL MAPLE OR LITTLE LEAF LINDEN 2-1/2- TO 3- CAL 2 1-411WJ77 tv 6lalyd fD .171srrf, ".f v 4t AXIX ./USTASf D.B../. ✓UST�)f D�'!'6LOPd/�NT /ALDI? IIY .tAIQ/ J// 90.E 250't F- - -- - -- - - 11 � I it I -H � I I I L ^Ampffrr a, SOUTiYllXD dNTiRPXlS6S nVIVA7 AM arcs as ZQNE 0010mtctAL Cl MINIMUM LOT AREA REQ NRrn 40.000 SO. FT. I0<TIN - 75.571 SOFT. PROPOSED 75,671 SOFT. (INCLUDES R.O.W.) (INCLUDES R.O.W.) MINIMUM ROAD FRONTAGE 200 FEET 174 FEET 174 FEET MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK 50 FEET 71 FEET 71 FEET MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK IS FEET 17 FEET 17 FEET MINIMUM REAR SETBACK 15 FEET 91 FEET 91 FEET LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15 FEET 34 FEET VARIES(31-46) FEET MAXIMUM OVERALL COVERAGE 70% 39.6%(30.024 SOFT.) 45.967[(34,696 SOFT. MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE 307E 1.71%(1,300 SO.FT.) 5.57R(4,224 SO.FT.) MAXIMUM FRONT YARD 307E SS.MS.057 SO.FT.) 55.2R(4,740 SO.FT.) SETBACK PAVED AREA RFNCMMARK: BUILDING FOUNDATION ELEV. 100.00' P.IO/YdJr JV Imc" fAr P/CJ J// -- aRAma -- 301't FILL AREA TO BE REMOVED ®� (. 1 O O D I i o L-=�1 ' TANKS 1 © I B I O I �l D ' I e 4 i 1 p•t If 7 I S I I � m Xn 7 aa• I EXISTING ' O ::.:... TOI BUILDING TO BE I B :.:;;80UTH BURUNGTON DUMPSTER 01 REMOVED O9 PAREING SPACES RETAIL SPACE PARKING SPACI BUILDING - 2.000 SOFT. 20 ACTUAL NUMBER 21 LEGEND - - PROF[RTY UN[ - - - RONT-or-MAT CURS [ ►O'.Ot UK ••••••••••••� UONT -' -• SILT It11a • % xcouou5 TRQ - .,�I.tlny • N..w.•ww. DECIDUOVS WIWIII- -x t• S tHwww.t• tw•.•.w.w• EKRORm/ SMRI► •M. 9 ««••• CKRORCCN 11KC - •wl•llny [wmra CONTOUII MS- Ms.- LIS - DOSTN10 MIMICIIAL SEW" - - - - - - - - - - - - ZONt SETASCK C93C-; C �*3aIla M�om Prf<�P�RTY OP \ e�cvc,�r mrx•.essr.�ue JOLL�'Y f1ASASOCIAT�;S' � rosar! Ill Ar4x iri RMl Qr •or4>-414flf 1 BURGER KING 76,871 SpU,/Rd' /dA'T 1.7I ACiP6S jlNCLUDdS LIVID JNSIDL' R/6AT OrF' .!./l^.i% SITE PLAN SCALE 1'- 20' GRAPHIC SCALE 20 10 0 20 40 SO SO 100 E z W V2 9 a CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 4, 2002 Steven Smith Jolley Associates P. O. Box 671 St. Albans, VT 05478 Re: Site plan and miscellaneous application #SP-02-10 and #MS-02-01 of Jolley Associates, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: Please find enclosed the Findings of Fact and Decision of the Development Review Board approval on March 19, 2002 in regards to the above referenced project. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement to apply for a zoning perm it within six (6) months, or this approval is null and void ( by 10/2/02). If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Stephanie A. Smith Associate Planner A� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit Number APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month . That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Type of application check one: ( ) ppeal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation) (VRequest for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( )'Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING? 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown o deed, mailing address, hone and fax #) � 0-0 SZ 7-61( 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax # S A h C AS CVA r 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #)fig a t� S 2-7 - G i t 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: >Jy rr-e_ NO 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) I — 0 0 7 7 - L 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each newuse and existing uses to remain) Al-e- r, j F, i 1 n P—Qcu- G f L c,f -K, Ia1 u -e KvcL&v\ c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) s� 2� -S2GtrX-e!:l d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) N, PC. f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing Z� S3 Proposed, LA • % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed qb % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing f'1 � • % Proposed N-V- % (does not apply to residential uses) 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) b) Landscaping: $ (py 0 , $ NIA, c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire propert c) P.M. Peak hour for entire properti 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATIOZ 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMP W.W 14) LIST ABUTTERS ( List names and addresses of all abutting property owners on a separate sheet of paper). I I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of in knowledge. W� • ZASICIY?CREOF AP I SIGNATUAE OF'PROPERTY. . Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: ;�- I ( 1' 014- REVIEW AUTHORITY: 'Z Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete Director o`fPianning & Zoning or Designee A DF'iPARTi�INT OF PLAI`ri111TZ\TG a ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SO= PL-RLL',1GTOi i, VERMONT 05408 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit number SP-O-z, - )1-3 PE LIGATION FOR SITE PLAIN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in foil. Failure to provide the requested information zither on this application form or on the site pian will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the rm Aew before the Deveiopment Review Board. 1) Obi TEIR OF RECORD Q Fame as shown on deed, railing address, Phone and fax #) �c,ll2y >>01 - si�SSuc,k 32J-(3k(G 2) I✓OCATION OF' LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) J3 k Z I � /�� 3 z Q ._ 311 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax 4) 4) CONTACT PERSON mailing address, phone a d fax �#) J � �$� z> 517-611 G S r#kh ��.x �SCu"Z) S 2-7- U l I S 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS:177 Q��j.srn� 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1 5` u-- u 01 7 7- C.-. 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) S�L / (-A'S , 1 2--S 3 b) P_oposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) USX— �f� . ate- , w�cu-O k � 1 It I r. -tb r4os- E-e�j .) T otal building square footage on property (proposed buildings and eadsdng buildings to remain) ff tl��tr\c, I 7dc— /Z�Z Z d.) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine)� e) Number of residential uni tS (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) MA - f) 1NTurrfber of ern-3loyees & company ve?iiOeS (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) L i a) Qther (list any other information perment to �tbis application not specifically equested above, please note ZQveriay Distracts are applicable): - 3) LOT COVERAGE I a.) Building: Emoting 1 Zs 3 94 Proposed N, A • % b) Overall(building, paring, outside storage, etc) E - % Proposed U % c) Front yard _(along each. street) EM % Proposed �h k �'N 9) COST ESTRAATES a.) Building (including interior renevat o;ns): b) Landscaping: / 0 O Q.Q0 c) Other site improvements (please list cost): _ 10) ESTIMATED TIC a) ,Avera.ge daily trafc for entire property (in.and out): , b) -1V. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.1i I Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS QP OPERATION: 12) PEAK DAYS OF QPERATION: 13) ES'TMiATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14) SITE PLAN AND PEE A site plan snail be submitted bvhich shows the =i ormnation. listed on Exhibit A attached. 'give (5) regular sire copies and one reduced copy (11" :, 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit i hereby certif;,f that ail the information requested as part, of this application has been submitted and is accurate -to the best of my knowledge. As sc ckc4t& OF SIGNIATUREOF PROPERTY Do not write below this line DATE OF STJBIVI[SSION.- ?—I I I 1 02— �-y REVIEW A=ORITY : Development Review Board F1 Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and Find it to be: 11 Complete 7 Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 3/19/02 MOTION OF APPROVAL JOLLEY ASSOCIATES —SITE PLAN APPLICATION & ALTERATION OF EXISTING GRADE, 977 SHELBURNE ROAD I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve site plan application #SP-02-08 and miscellaneous use application #MS-02-01 of Jolley Associates to amend a previously approved site plan consisting of a convenience store with gas sales. The amendment consists of adding an undetermined amount of fill to the rear of the lot, as depicted on a plan entitled "S. B. Collins Shelburne Road Fill Plan," prepared by Schreib Engineering, Inc., dated 1/1.5/2002, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The plan shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning (hereinafter Director). Three (3) copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director prior to permit issuance. a) The plan shall be revised to show the city's 60' r.o.w. at pre -fill conditions illustrating the removal of fill from the r.o.w. b) The plan shall be revised to indicate the amount of fill placed on the property. 3) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall submit an acceptable plan for the rehabilitation of the site at the conclusion of the operations, including grading, seeding and planting, fencing, drainage, and other appropriate measures. 4) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the Zoning Regulations or this approval is null and void. 5) The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer upon completion of the rehabilitation. 6) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. A Pdawf7 or IJ.B..l. ✓USTdR 11BY�60P,YdNT iDLOYd !!! A/G! J1/ 250't A '1 5 PiMpArii Rr SOUTBI.�HD dNTlt'RPPISdS rruoa-d dr! AIQI ifs +1 i 10I I R.O.W. II TO \ I SOUTH BURLINGTON I' \see --- �\ PROPLRTY OF JOLL�'Y �ASASOCI�T�AS �'OLIl,Il6 .�16 P.1GL' ,9,20 YOLll1i(L' .27O PACL' 44:�-448 �se�r spaiee°.►e�T !. 9/ ACRdS ,rrrrclao�s uvo irs�ve•.vcBT �.r ,�.�ys` R. RETAL FLOOR 1062 W. R. vPRESENT covERAOE .mL FUTURE oovERAoc .mc COVERAGE GPM R[TNL W/ ADDITON 1263 SO. 10 @FN 0ARK• BUILDING FOUNDA110N ELEV. 100.00' lfOPd.%7' a• i5'0�7.lRI! ✓USTd� c,lRY .# AN�V ✓USTdiP II.B.,/. ✓USTBR !li!�LOP,YdNT AVZAWX JW AIR/' J// 00IS10 ., II BURGER HIGI — SITE PLAN SCALE: 1"- 20' GRAPHIC SCALE 20 10 O 20 40 BO SO 100 Aw"Ar ar PR - - OFOTT' UNE - - - RIONT-OF-WAY CURB POWER LNE ......««..� «..w..«« UONTFE - - - - - - - - - PRE-L CONTOUR APPROX. - - DUSTNO PRE-f1LL COW" - ��'•1///-�•�• SILT FENCE ...«.«.. J��C ...«..«.. OECIDVOUS TREE ...«......��jj®��, .....«r..« DECIDUOUS0S SHRUB �"'•""" • •��'� EVERGREEN SHRUB EEN .«...........«.««.. EVERGRTREE EXISTING CONTOUR US-- •M3 US— EXR:TNO NUNICS•AL SI.ROt 1 GZL'3.C� � 3�O to 1 GZL'3.C� � 3�O to DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO March 119, 2002 MEETING size for the SEQ District. The applicant proposes a transfer of 1.5'of frontage from lot #79 to lot #78. They are still above the minimum frontage requirement of 80'. 7) JOLLEY ASSOCIATES —MISCELLANEOUS USE AND SITE PLAN APPLICATION-977 SHELBUIRNE ROAD This project consists of amending a site plan for a convenience store with gas sales. The amendment consists of altering the existing grade by placing an unknown amount of fill to the rear of the property. Staff discovered the applicant placed the fill on the property without approval. They were placed in violation and this application is to correct this violation. This property at 977 Shelburne Road lies within the Commercial 1 District. It is bounded on the north by K-Mart Plaza, on the west and south by Hannaford Plaza, and on the east by the Shelburne Road. This property has a 60' r.o.w. for a proposed city street to connect Hannaford Plaza with the K-Mart Plaza. The recent approval of the Lowe's store requires construction of this street through the 60' n o. w. Fill: Staff requests the fill within the City's 60' r.o.w. should be removed and returned to pre -fill conditions and so noted on the site plan. Staff also requests submission of a plan for the rehabilitation of the site at the conclusion of the operations, including grading, seeding and planting. Other: The applicant should provide the amount of fill placed on the property. 7 To: Applicants From: Stephanie Smith, City of South Burlington RE: Project Staff Notes Date: March 4, 2001 Re: Site plan #SP-02-08 and miscellaneous use #MS-02-01 applications of Jolley Associates, 977 Shelburne Road. Overview: Site plan and miscellaneous use applications of Jolley Associates is to add fill to the rear of the lot to raise elevation. Issues: ■ It appears some fill is located in South Burlington's ROW. The applicant should be aware that the fill located in this ROW should be moved and the grade returned to what it was before the fill was put in place. • The applicant should provide to staff a plan for how the area will be reseeded once the fill is in place. Completeness of Plan: The applicant has submitted sufficient information for Development Review Board to consider the sketch plan application with the above exceptions noted. Please provide additional information by March 12, 2002. Recommendation: Staff recommends this application be authorized to proceed for sketch plan consideration at the March 19, 2002 meeting. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONI' 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 4, 2002 Mr. Steve Smith Jolley Associates PO Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the March i9, zooz Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl./Td DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 MARCH 2O02 PAGE 3 S. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application. #SD-02-10 of James and Deborah Borow and Paul J. Yandow to amend a planned residential development consisting of 296 residential units and an 18-hole golf course. The amendment consists of adjusting the property boundary between 40 and 60 Tabor Place: The applicant said this is just a lot line adjustment. Staff had no issues with the application. Mr. Cameron moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-02-10 of James and Deborah Borow and Paul J. Yandow subject to the stipulations in the draft motion of 19 March 2002. Mr. Schmitt seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Public Hearing: Application #MS-02-01 of Jolley Associates seeking approval under Section 25.117, Alteration of Existing Grade, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to fill at the rear of the property, 977 Shelburne Road: Mr. Killory said they have been filling west of the right-of-way. There is about 6-10 inches of fill that extends about 5-8 inches into the right-of-way. Ms. Smith said staff is asking that this be removed. Mr. Killory said they will do this. Mr. Cameron asked why the fill has been placed there. Mr. Killory said they are trying to build up the property. The fill came from the Wesson diner site (about 40-50 dumptruck loads). No other issues were raised. Mr. Cameron moved to approve application #MS-02-01 of Jolley Associates subject to the stipulations in the draft motion of 19 March 2002. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Clerk CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 14, 2002 Steve Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, VT 05478 Re: 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and my comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, March ig, zooz at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, S75 Dorset Street. S incerely, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer E ncl./td PUBLIC HEARING . SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development and Re- view Board will hold a Public hearing at the South Burlington Citv Hall, Conference Room. 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington. Vermont on Tuesday. March 19 2002 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Preliminary plat appli- cation #SD-J2-13 of Wii- liston Roac Management Co.. LLC to add two (2) dwelling units to a two (2) family dwelling on a lot developed with three (3) mixed use commer- cial buildings and an ac- cessory structure, 397 Patchen Road. 2. Final plat application #SD-02.12 of Ironwood Real Estate, LLC to amend a planned resi- dential development consisting of 296 resi- dential units and an 18 hole golf course. The amendment consists of eliminating a 60 foot right - of - way for a proposed city street between 207- 229 Fairway Drive and 247-249 Fairway Drive. 3. Final plat application #SD-02-10 of James and Deborah Borow and Paul J. Yandow to amend a planned residential deve- lopment consisting of 296 residential units and an 18 hole golf course. The amendment cons. ists of adjusting the pro- perty boundary between 40 and 60 Tabor Place. 4. Application aMS-02- 01 of Jolley Associates seeking appproval under Section N.117, Altera- tion of Existing Grade, of the South Burlington Zon- ing Regulations. Request is for permission to place fill at the rear of the pro- perty, 977 Shelburne Road. Copies of the applica- tions are available for public inspection at the Sauth Burlington City Hall. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Deve- lopment Review Board March 2, 2002 i 575 Dorset Street Phone: 846-4106 Fax: 846-4101 I To: Steve Smith From: Stephanie A. Smith Fax: 527-0115 Date: March 7, 2002 Phone: Pages: 2 Re: 977 Shelburne Road CC: Re: Site plan and miscellaneous use applications of Jolley Associates Dear Mr. Smith: Please find attached the preliminary comments on the above referenced application. The project is currently scheduled to be considered by the Development Review Board on March 19, 2002. If you wish to respond to these comments or submit additional information, please do so no later than March 12, 2002. Please be sure that someone is at this meeting to represent your application. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Stephanie A. Smith Associate Planner City of South Burlington, Planning & Zoning 1 CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS FOR 3/19/2002 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING S.B. COLLINS-SHELBURNE ROAD 1) SITE PLAN PREPARED BY SCHREIB ENGINEERING DATED 1-16-02 ARE ACCEPTABLE. LARRY CHETTI-HINESBURG ROAD 2) SEWER MAIN SHOULD BE IN THE STREET WHERE POSSIBLE FOR QUICK ACCESS TO MANHOLES UNDER ALL WEATHER CONDITIONS. 3) THE STATE SHOULD BE APPROACHED TO PURCHASE THIS PARCEL FOR THE HINESBURG INTERCHANGE. 4) STREET SHOULD HAVE A TURNAROUND ADEQUATE FOR A SCHOOL BUS. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, `IERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 2, 2001 ®avid Killary Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, VT 05478 Re: Zoning Violation, 977 & 1830 Shelburne Road ®ear Mr. Killary: It has come to my attention that Jolley Associates has replaced the canopy lights at 977 and 1830 Shelburne Road. Please be advised that exterior lighting is regulated by the City under the site plan review process. Any change to anything regulated by the site plan review process must be approved through that process. Since you have not obtained site plan approval for these lighting changes, you are in violation of the zoning regulations. Please complete the enclosed Site Plan review applications together with the appropriate fee and supporting documents and plans as soon as possible. Failure to obtain the necessary approvals will result in legal action by the City. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RIB/mcp CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 20, 2000 Carl Ruprecht S.B. Collins, Inc. P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, VT 05478 Re: Landscaping Modification, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Carl: This is in response to your letter of April 6, 2000. I have reviewed the plan to replace the Rugosa Rose shrubs with different shrubs. This plan is acceptable and you have my authorization to proceed with your plan. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Ra*r*, Rd I. Belair, Adml'i8trative Officer RIB/mcp SBCollins,inc. 54 Lower Welden Street PO: Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 802 527-0116■893-7744 April 6, 2000 Fax 527-011 S, Mr. Ray Blair Zoning Administrator 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Shelburne Road Mobil, 970 Shelburne Road Dear Ray: The attached blueprint illustrates the Rugosa Rose shrubs planted in 1986 that I would like to replace. I intend to cover the same area with 3 gallon size lilac (7), hydrangea (14) and Seagreen juniper (13). A drawing is also attached illustrating the layout of these shrubs. If this improvement is acceptable, please mail or fax a stamped copy. Thank you very much. Sincerely, S.B. COLLINS, INC. C, r. -- Carl Ruprecht /aw Distributor of Petroleum Products "'Tcr,� . CA f City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802)658-7955 August 12, 1998 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: Landscaping Modifications, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING (802)658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on July 14, 1998 (effective 8/6/98). Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i cerely, Jo Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 End City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802)658-7955 July 22 , 1998 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: 2 Lot Subdivision Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING (802)658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the June 9, 1998 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. JogWeith, Cit Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl t■w ILLI► IM/[ Mlalrr tA� !0 1 .AK Im /r LEGEND 010101010 - - - twlr-a r■r ............ .gyp ............. ttAlT y � � • M a< • a�A■If !• 1•t• •i •tFM►�� I•. �� M I.1R MN IYI Yi � .M.• IIa IlG O tto•■i•oe a •w ■ ® tANll• •4RI flat tistl,toR - gt�E-1 I I F------ STORAdC imap +l AqLVL i r JtJN 0 5 1998 City of So. Burlington JAN%-s.az- � m � - - - - 30LiTFi BURLINGTON - - - - gum Palm Lm - .wwwww wwwww. .wwwww ' wwwww. .wwwwwwwww.• •w. wwwwwwwwww• tt.ttt� .wwwwwwwwwttt� ■w. wwwwwwwwww• �� .wwwwwwwwww ■wa 3CFiED[JLL - LSLIND lY. T!q Stsi a1f•117flT LILAC , © ARDORNTAi 1 GAL • • 9AR94My , OAL I, O Rpq( 2 X 4 4 f eulww• suea , CAL 10 ®SALT TOf, wAru i urnc LAM Lwvo+ 2--,/K' To r SAL. 2 ttt„lL Pubir � AM DIlrETISE7t L RAM m�—=Nlm BURGER ICING, SITE PLAN GRAPHIC 9CA1.Z so,• • �• » w w tw X. COVERAGE ■Row !1■TAIL ,1/ AaAT10• ltip •► R 11<LI. ROOR toH q R fYR■lt o•t■■lA■[ ■es 0 a mom soa (sQ DCTAfU •1\ A■00 IlAll■lml1/ RAW ADDED !l■t/R aA,f. Jt'1oR/1■[ Alm{ R■,•AOM i tloVaA01 11. 18" AMfw U■IIT a Luol •■TA1al A••. liR1O1 A Ali R/w A•oo mvOMR o,Wtr R■tAtoR J. rAw■N a0.t■.r Aww .■ a.o.K ,o •ou7M MRaal•toM KaA■R 4 AfIL T. t•M A9•m 71m AND Mll••OVt •OI.IRL t••Vw ACLrAtX ttntSIoR a MAY 3. t■.0 wno ta.wo IR1)A1t R[MS'OM t lll■ 1 /N« A9tt 7,R) llla7 ROIOK GIIt• M ■a■MIK o,l+,wwl o.Tr. a'Oo"m °j-L SHELBURNE ROAD rleo.fecr:.:,-, SCAM r—>ea WNTACT CmQwc" TO SITE PLAN nsLn vu,nr ALL LOCA710N3 P1,Id, lb JtIL7DlMNL RWD SOtJi}i YUR1Ai0'T01t, VFJtMOlR SCHREIH ENGINEERING, INC. — coxs[nrruaa artanaErxs w K a� usr VvufWR 0/ 1 DRAWING NO. 829-1-1 RMSoN • MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Joe Weith, City Planner RE: Comments, July 14, 1998 Agenda Items DATE: July 10, 1998 2) Consent Agenda: JOLLEY ASSOCIATES - LANDSCAPING MODIFICATIONS - SITE PLAN This application was continued from the June 9, 1998 meeting due to the applicant's absence. This project consists of amending a plan previously approved on 4/12/94 (minutes enclosed) to construct a 262 square foot addition to a convenience store with gas sales. The amendment consists of altering the landscaping in the front yard. The only issue affected by this application is landscaping. Staff discovered that the applicant modified the landscaping in the front by removing four (4) deciduous trees and requested that an amended site plan be submitted. This property located at 977 Shelburne Road lies within the C 1 District. It is bounded on the north by the K-Mart Plaza, on the west and south by Hannaford Plaza, and on the east by Shelburne Road. Landscaping The 4/12/94 plan showed that there were four (4) existing deciduous trees in the front yard in the green space between the two (2) driveways. These four (4) trees have been removed. The applicant is proposing to add two maples or lindens in the front island. Staff supports this proposal. Recommended conditions: All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The two (2) additional trees shall be planted during the 1998 planting season. Prior to the planting of these trees, the applicant shall post a $695 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 3. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. -) T.NIC page Mr. O'Rourke moved the PLanning Commission aoprove the site oLan apolication of Ken Smith to .amend a oreviousLv approved plan for a 33,000 sq._ft_._buiLdi_ng for a multiple of commercial and industrial uses The amendment consists of reducing the_ amount of landscaping required, 49 Commerce Avenue as_deeicted on_a plan entitled "Kenneth P. Smith (owner) Lot 25/26 49 Commerce Ave So Burlington, VT," prepared by K.P. Smith General Contractors, dated 6/30/97 with the following stipulations_ 1. A11__previous approvals and stipulations which are not super- seded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Pursuant_ to Section _2_6_.1_05 (a) of the zoning regulations, the Planning_ Commission _grants a landscaping credit for the patio and rock wall. _T_he _r_em_ai_ning shortfall in required landscaping shall be met_by_increasing sizes of proposed landscaping. The _elan shall be revised according) 3. Any change to the site plan shall_ re3uire__eeroval by the South Burlingtaa 'Tanning Commission. Ms. Barone seconded. Mo'__on passed 5-1 with Mr. O'Rourke opposing. 10. Site plan application of Jolley Associates to amend a previously appro%r(-.-d plan to construct a 262 sq. ft. addition to a convenience store with gas sales. The amendment consists of altering the landscaping in the front yard, 977 Shelburne Rd: There w-�:, no oris present to present the plan. Mr. Dinklage moved to continue the application until 14 July. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 11. Continued site plan application of Rexbo, Inc., to construct an 840 sq. ft. canopy and add or.- fueling position on a .:).-op-arty developed with a 1299 sq. ft. service station, 794 Shelburne Rd: Mr. Bean said they will close the 2 curb cuts on Lindenwood Drive. They have received Zoning Board aproval for the front yard setback variance. The two closed curb cuts will be grassed in. Mr. Beaudin suggested a grassy area between the two cur',-) cuts on Shelburne Rd. Mr. Bean suggested an equal amount of blacktop near the dumpster as a trade. Mr. Weith suggested some green space around the signs and ri:�:.- City- of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 OLANNER 658- i 955 July 10, 1998 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: 2 Lot Subdivision Dear Mr. Smith: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, July 14, 1998 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Weith, Planner JW/mcp Encls PLANNING COMMISSION 12 April 1994 page 3 need to reduce the impact on the wetlands buffers, particularly in the northwest corner of the development. There will be the same number of lots with no lot smaller than what has already been approved (60' x 120'for the smallest lots). They have also moved the bike path out of the wetland buffer. They also moved RV parking to the north of the multi -family lots in the VELCO right-of-way. VELCO has approved this. Mr. Austin asked how many more lots would become substandard. Mr. Steele said about 10. Mr. Austin said it was unfortunate that they are adding more lots of less than minimum lot size. Mr. Burgess asked what would be lost if they just removed the lots infringing on the wetland buffer. Mr. Steele said 2 lots would be lost. Mr. Burgess said he didn't feel the Commission wanted more smaller than standard lot. Mr. Craig and Ms. Peacock were uncomfortable with more substandard lots. Mrs. Maher and Mr. Sheahan had no problem because of the large open space. They felt it was preferable to more multi -family units. Mr. Llewellyn said open space is increasing by over an acre. Mr. Burgess emphasized to the applicant that there might be a problem approving the increase in substandard sized lots. 5. Site Plan application of Jolley Associates to construct a 262 sq. ft. addition to a convenience store with gas sales and a 12' x 24' dumpster shed, 977 Shelburne Rd: Mr. Smith showed areas around dumpster to be landscaped. They will deed a 60 ft. right-of-way_' ight-of-way to the city, and he showed the location of this as well. Mr.Belair said the City Attorney has determined that the location of the right-of-way does not automatically create a new lot. Mr. Belair said landscaping is $230. short. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission a rove the Site Plan -------- ------- -- rr_._..PL'._._r. ----- --- --- applicatio_ n of Jolley_ Assoc_iat_ e_s to constructa_ 262sq. ft. ad- ditio_n_to a convenience store with qas�sales and �a 12' x24' dump- ster shed, 977 Shelburne Road as _de acted on a _ lan entitled "S. -- - - ----r--- --r.__.r..�1_.._.._-.....E.._.� - - --- B. Collins, ShelburneWRoad, SiteWPla_n," dated March 12, 1993, last revised Lpril 7, 1994,�prepared_by Schreib Engineerinq , Inc, with the followlno�stipulations:_ 1. All__ previous approvals and stipulations whichare not�su er- seded ]2y Lhi2_2pj2roval shall remain in effect. 2. The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning build- ingpermit to show theWchanges listed below_ and shall require ap- proval of the City Planner. Three copies_ ofYthe_approved�revised flan shall be submitted to the City Planner �Prior WtoWpermit issu- PLANNING COMMISSION 12�APRIL�1994��� page-4� ance. a) Additional Wlandsca_pingWshall be Wadded to -the clan with a minimum value of $230. W b) The �plan �shall_ be�revisedWto note that the Citv�of South Burlington will be�given an irrevocable �offer �of�dedication for the _ pr2posed�60�foot r._o.w._ 3. The applicant shall cost a _land scape_bond in the amount of $450. This bond shall _besosted_oriorWto�issuance �of�a�zoning/ building�2ermit.Theb_ond shall remain Win�effect for three ears to assure that the �landscaoing-has�taken �root �and �has a_good chance of �surviV-Lu—��� 4. This proper Z is located in Traffic; overlay Zoned_ which allows this property to generate a maximum of 28.4 7ehicle_trir ends(vte's) du ring_the_PM_peak_hour- ITE�estimates theting _exis use to enerateW68.4 vte's d_u_rin_c_t_h_eo_m_ peak hour and with the proposed addition to�generate87.6�vte's.-y�This �is�a�19.2 vte increase. Pursuant to Section _ 1 7_._5_Q_of the zoninns�ulations , the Planninq Commission may approve peak hour traffic volumes__ above the normal standards if it determines that other site improvements will_Eroduce a�net benefit for traffic flow4in the tic_inity. __It is the�_PlanniCommission''ssWopinion that - ranting the - Cites a_60 foot�rrotw. across the central portion of the _ _ property which could�be usedto continue the proposed r. pow. on the adjacent Pomer_le_au propertv_to_.the_-Martcrooerty willWprovide�such a benefit. Therefore, the provisions_ of Sec- tion 17.50 are�adeguately met. 5. The.aoMlicant shall contribute $493_Eri2rWto issuance of a zonin buildin permit to the Shelburne_ Road Intersection Im- provement Fund for the _ 19.2 additional vte's to be enerated by this_oroject. 6. The legal documents (i.e., irrevocable_ offer of dedication) for the 60 foot r._o.w. shall be submitted for review and approval by t_he_ Cit_ Attorne-This document shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior_to_issuance of the zoning/ building permit_. 7_. AnL_ne_w exterior lighting_shall consist of �downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light_b�ond t_h_eoroperty line. Any changein liqhtinq shall be approved -y L' _Cif PlannerWorior to installation. ���� ����� 8. The a licant shall obtain a zoning building_parMit_,wit_h_in six months or this ap2roval is null and void. W PLANNING C_O_MMISSION 12 APRIL 1994��� oa oe 5 9. Th_e_applican_ts_hall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the WAdministrative �Officer—prior Wto�use Wof�the addition. 10. Any change to the site clan shall require approval_ by the South Burlington Planning�Commission.— Mrs. Maher seconded the motion which�then_oassed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:45 pm. -�- 6/9/98 s � y " MOTION OF APPROVAL JOLLEY ASSOCIATES I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Jolley Associates to amend a previously approved plan to construct a 262 square foot addition to a convenience store with gas sales. The amendment consists of altering the landscaping in the front yard, 977 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a plan entitled "S.B. Collins Shelburne Road Site Plan Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Schrcib Engineering, Inc., dated March 12, 1993, last revised on 6/2/98, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The two (2) additional trees shall be planted during the 1998 planting season. Prior to the planting of these trees, the applicant shall post a $695 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 3. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. — �//o .S� „Y - � ) �/s/s� To�«Y �4s���1�5 ,�9� �,6x S��r 13�� Memorandum - Planning June 9, 1998 agenda items June 5, 1998 Page 6 9) KEN SMITH - LANDSCAPING MODIFICATION - SITE PLAN This project consists of amending a site plan previously approved on 6/13/95 (minutes enclosed) and amended on 10/22/96 and 12/17/96 for a 35,000 square foot building for a multiple of commercial and industrial uses. The amendment consists of reducing the amount of landscaping required. The only issue affected by this application is landscaping. This property located at 49 Commerce Avenue lies within the IC and CO Districts. It is bounded on the east and south by undeveloped property, on the west by a warehouse, and on the north by Commerce Avenue. Landscaping_ The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $15,000. The site plan approved showed proposed landscaping to meet this request. This landscaping has yet to be planted. The applicant is requesting a credit of $7225 for site improvements other than tree plantings as provided for under Section 26.105(a) of the zoning regulations. The site improvements proposed includes a patio and patio retaining wall, a dry creek for water runoff and a walkway. Other: The site plan should be revised so that planting details A, B and C match the locations indicated on the plan. 10) JOLLEY ASSOCIATES - LANDSCAPING MODIFICATIONS - SITE PLAN This project consists of amending a plan previously approved on 4/12/94 (minutes enclosed) to construct a 262 square foot addition to a convenience store with gas sales. The amendment consists of altering the landscaping in the front yard. The only issue affected by this application is landscaping. Staff discovered that the applicant modified the landscaping in the front by removing four (4) deciduous trees and requested that an amended site plan be submitted. This property located at 977 Shelburne Road lies within the C 1 District. It is bounded on the north by the K-Mart Plaza, on the west and south by Hannaford Plaza, and on the east by Shelburne Road. Landscaping The 4/12/94 plan showed that there were four (4) existing deciduous trees in the front yard in the green space between the two (2) driveways. These four (4) trees have been removed. N Memorandum - Planning June 9, 1998 agenda items June 5, 1998 Page 7 Staff recommends that these trees be replaced with four (4) street trees. I I ) REXBO DEVELOPMENT, INC. - CANOPY (SHELBURNE ROAD) - SITE PLAN This application was continued from the May 26, 1998 meeting (minutes not available) to allow the ZBA to grant the variance request before approving the site plan and allow the applicant an opportunity to revise the site plan. A revised plan was submitted which eliminates the two (2) curb cuts on Lindenwood Drive as requested by the Planning Commission. Staff's May 26, 1998 memo is enclosed for your review. 7 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 5, 1998 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: Landscaping Modification, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June 9, 1998 at 7:30 P.M.. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Joe Weith, 7"/) City Planner JW/mcp Encls asw IZGLrND M01tTY lff — — w•�, a�-+nY qM. cm CHAO" f ..aax um u.Mr • al w..w • i -•• 1• wlt 0 our _ • Marra. ...rn ..r.L.•w a.. r.....a IJitDscA Ps — aszr ♦6lJ1 LLL� TO 1,r arfa K � aN.•N a aa� a • .+•m a •al a a11111M• •IMM7z, fax • I , / / • , I—soum HVRrnvoTox wwwww. .wwwww . wwwww. .wwwww wwwww. wwwwwwwwww. .wwwwwwwwww �. wwwwwwwwww■ .wwwwwwwwwa� � RECEIVED MAY 0 b 1948 City of So. Burlington 1YY. 1T/l � WMIIlf we , CAL 3 © APsoRvrrAs , CAL. • © GARMCMy 1 CAI. it O ROCK i X 4 2 t=:=:T\ 3 — afAet — N,.al e�r•.Y AIR aaso,sa„ I I nfaaw• y L � ImIoI I ol•�m�•�•� ,� BURGER iCIPiG SITE PLAN sown ,-_so• am GRAPHIC SCAM • N • N M N N fN COYERAGS — afAet — N,.al e�r•.Y AIR aaso,sa„ I I nfaaw• y L � ImIoI I ol•�m�•�•� ,� BURGER iCIPiG SITE PLAN sown ,-_so• am GRAPHIC SCAM • N • N M N N fN COYERAGS •saga asrfa. y Aoen•N ,aN w n. usrAL Real +aN a< w rNwrr aa�w� ,..*.,a a.Nww•• O a n YO•L IfCN (sex DRAp) •fVl••M L AY•Y•f 11. 1•«i •MAMA oN14 A••O UNR M1C 7/MA•[ 11m1 •,I►AIMaD NQOaM AaON IN11M41► MAY! •aM11•a 1 MWO.•1 i, 1•q A•O•• IlaMT 1 IYINI MAat A•OO LIINI l0 SR RAM AWE NVaAAj[ a1MItT RiuwaM i YA1101 f•i.la•r A••p .r a.e.•r. 7e NvaN wtt•.anaw RlWaM 4 Alan 7. ,MM A9o0 }I•a7 AM LAMMdMa •*qMXMM Opism AL .Ia'MN mAtlf Inaara 4 WAY i 1801 A•O IaLNIf Ve/IN D'�"".,r', "' 1e' S. B. COLLINS "' TO O01m' °JA SHELBURNE ROAD rRwec,: •:s-, sow4 r—to• ooMTAcr won+cu SITE PLAN /IQD Vl'JtFY All IrOCAI,ON• MIOR TO 11MJURIIE ROAD sOU1i1 •URUNCTDN, VpWdfi Zmw E scHItaH ENGnNEERING, INC. — coxsvl.rtxa rrralx xs .Asr tea. Cr 1 DRAWING NO. 829-1-1 R"moN 3 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 21, 1998 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: Landscaping Modification, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer, William Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, May 29, 1998. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, llwl Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls Preliminary Memo - Planning June 9, 1998 agenda items May 21, 1998 Page 2 — the portable warehouse behind Bed & Bath should be removed. — in addition to a fence screening the dumpster storage area, a dense evergreen hedge should be planted to screen the dumpster storage area from Market Street. JOLLEY ASSOCIATES - LANDSCAPING MODIFICATION - SITE PLAN plan should be revised to add two (2) street trees with a minimum size of 2 '/2" - 3" caliper along the front of the property. Staff suggests either Littleleaf Linden or a salt tolerant Maple. KEN SMITH - LANDSCAPING MODIFICATION - SITE PLAN — planting details A, B, and C do not match the locations indicated on the site plan. 2 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: June 9, 1998 Agenda Items Date: May 21,1998 S.B. COLLINS - MOBIL SERVICE STATION - SHELBURNE ROAD The concrete curbs at entrances and island do not cross the sidewalk as plan shows. ALAN PALMER & S.M.S. REALTY CORPORATION - LOT SUBDIVISION - WILLISTON ROAD Plat plan of a 3 lot subdivision dated September, 1997 prepared by Vermont Land Surveyor is acceptable. ROBERTS PROPERTY BUILDING EXPANSION - WILLISTON ROAD Method of providing water and sewer services should be shown on the plan. DORSET SQUARE BLUE MALL - DORSET STREET The Dorset Street r.o.w. should correctly show what was taken from the street construction a few years ago. The plan shows the sidewalk/bike path on private property. KENNETH P. SMITH - LOT 25 & 26 - COMMERCE AVENUE Site plan dated 6/30/97 with latest revision dated 4/11/98 is acceptable. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: June 9 , 1998 agenda items Date: May 8, 1998 1) 2) 3) 4) Alan Palmer Dated 4/30/98 Palmer Court Acceptable R. Lawrence Roberts Dated 5/l/98 3082 & 3090 Williston Road If a spray booth is included, it should be sprinklered. Roger Schibani Dated 5/l/98 150 Dorset Street Acceptable Jolley Associates Dated 5/6/98 977 Shelburne Road Acceptable CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Planning Commission. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) ZLCfN A/>il k & 7) Z/�4 gpZ - S2 ?— O Dl e, S25g= 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name(mailing address, phone and fax #)) c�T.6a4yFin) D 5/W 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: --Y?? 4)-�qv 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Usgs on Property (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed remain) c) Total build es (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if asement and mezzanine) e) Number of r9sidential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above): 7) LOT COVERAGE � J 12" a) Building: Existing % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC % Proposed % a) Average daily traffic (in and out): .*V C� b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour (In and out): 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: Wd 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Na CyZC-1' 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: D6x,,e_- 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write bt-Jow it Ci6 iii is Planning Commission 11 City Planner I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Incomplete y C� l 5 City Planner or Designee Date (Apfrmsp) City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 27, 1998 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 We have reviewed your site plan application for 977 Shelburne Road and deem it to be incomplete. You have not provided answers to items #5, 6a - 6f, 7, and 9-12 on the application. Please provide an answer for each of these items. Thank you. Sincere Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist April 16, 1998 Jolley Associates Attn: Carl Ruprecht 54 Lower Welden Street St. Albans V T 05478 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 (802) 879-5656 Permit # WW-4-0869 -- gas station and convenience store located on Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Permitee: We received an inquiry regarding food service at the above referenced building. In reviewing our files, we found that the design flows were based on the number of gas pumps, and there was no reference to any type of food service. We do require a permit amendment for the addition of food service, even limited food service, such as a hot dog steamer or soup pot, as this would be a change of use and would require addition design flows. If you would like to prepare sandwiches and/or have a grill, the design flows would probably be 100 - 200 gallons per day, where as the limited service would be less. I have enclosed an application form for your convenience. If you are just adding a hotdog steamer and/or soup pot, the minor amendment fee of $50.00 would be appropriate, if you are preparing sandwiches, etc., the miniumum fee of $100.00 would probably be appropriate. Sincerely, Jessan ie Wyr.:an Assistant Regional Engineer Enclosure-WW application form c City of South Burlington Planning Commission G. Norman Schreib Department of Health -Taylor Gillich Dolores LaRiviere City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658- 7955 April 3, 1998 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: Zoning Violation, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This is to follow up on my letter to you dated 10/6/97 informing you that the landscaping changes made at 977 Shelburne Road need approval from the Planning Commission. It has been five (5) months since you were notified that approval was necessary and no application has been submitted. Unless you submit a complete application for this modification within two (2) weeks, the City will begin legal action to obtain compliance with its zoning regulations. I look forward to receiving the plans and application soon so we can avoid legal action. Sincerely, I r--,K Raymond J. Belair, Zoning & Planning Assistant RJB/mcp PLANNER 658-7955 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 05478 October 6, 1997 Re: Site Modification, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: It has come to our attention that you have modified approved on 4/12/94 at 977 Shelburne Road. This includes revising the landscaping along the front of by removing four (4) deciduous trees. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 the site plan modification the property Condition #10 of the most recent approval states that "any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission." Since you have made changes to the site plan without the Planning Commission's approval, you are in violation of the zoning regulations. To correct this violation, please complete the enclosed Site Plan application and return it to this office with a $25 filing fee and five (5) site plans showing the changes made. You will then be placed on the next available Planning Commission agenda. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sinc ly, Raym nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 3, 1996 Howard J. Seaver, Esquire Greene & Seaver, Inc. 95 St. Paul Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Jolley Associates, City of South Burlington Dear Mr. Seaver: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find the original Quitclaim Deed from the City of South Burlington to Jolley Associates. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Raym Y'J. Belair, Zoning & Planning Assistant JW/mcp 1 Encl STEVEN F. STT1Z61. PA'ITI R. PAGE• JOSEPII S. P&LEAN (•ALSO ADMMID IN NX.) Howard J. Seaver, Esq. Greene & Seaver, Inc. 95 St. Paul Street Burlington, VT 05401 STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 13A'1"1'ERY S1'RU'T PO 130X 1507 11URL1NGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VO1CU1'DD) FAX (802) 660-2552 May 9, 1996 Re: South Burlington/Jolley Associates Dear Howard: OF COUNSEL AR'n1UR W. CERNOSIA R01317WF E. FIX-MIER Enclosed please find a copy of the Amendment to Offer of Irrevocable Dedication as recorded by the South Burlington City Clerk on April 29, 1996, as well as a copy of the Quit Claim Deed filed on the same day. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call. I believe that Ray Belair plans to send you the original Quit Claim Deed as recorded. If it does not arrive shortly please let me know and I will track it down. Thanks for your help. - 1 Sincer Yy, i Robert E. Fletcher REF/maf Enclosures cc: Raymond Belair (w/out enclosures) SON2096.COR �— csorded In Vol . x ` . Surfington STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET BURLINGTON, VE:RMONT 05401 �Mivs fol i ct 4Q1 on paga- nd Resorsjg A "icarn �;ty :er►� KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont Municipality located in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantor") for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby RELEASE, REMISE and FOREVER QUITCLAIM unto JOLLEY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership with a place of business in St. Albans, County of Franklin and State of Vermont (the "Grantee") and its successors and assigns forever, a parcel of land which is more particularly described as follows: A parcel of land being all and the same lands and premises conveyed to the City of South Burlington by Warranty Deed of Jolley Associates dated April 6, 1995 and recorded June 13, 1995 in Volume 378, Page 61 of the City of South Burlington Land Records and being described therein as follows: "Being a portion of the same lands and premises conveyed to Jolley Associates by deed of Lowell T. and Susan G. Spillane dated June 16, 1987 and recorded in Volume 216, Page 320 of the South Burlington Land Records. Reference is made to a survey map prepared by Brooks Land Surveying, Inc. entitled "Right of Way Plat, Jolley Associates," dated December 11, 1994 and recorded in Volume 365, Page 106 ("the Map"). [The Map is based on an earlier survey map prepared by Buck & Pierce entitled "S.B. Collins Inc., Map of Boundary Survey, Shelburne Road, U.S. Rte. Seven, City of South Burlington, Vermont (Project 86038)," dated October 1, 1986 and revised May 17, 1988 and recorded in Volume 252, Page 88.] This subject premises are more particularly described as follows: A strip of land sixty (60) feet, more or less, in uniform width, designated on the Map as "Revised Location of Right of Way to be Granted to City of South Burlington." STITZEI. & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 Beginning at a point in the southerly boundary of property of Howard Juster, Gary and Ann Juster d/b/a Juster Development ("Juster") marked by a concrete monument, which point is S 72' 04' 10" E 250.12 feet from the northwest corner of the Jolley parcel; thence S 18' 55' 50" W, a distance of 105.12 feet to a point on the southerly boundary of the Jolley parcel; thence N 700 401 05" W, along the southerly boundary of the Jolley parcel, a distance of 60 feet to a point; thence N 180 55' 50" E, a distance of 103.65 feet to a point in the southerly boundary of Juster; thence S 72' 04' 10" E, a distance of 60.01 feet along the southerly boundary of Juster to the point and place of beginning. Also conveyed are all improvements located on, over and under said property including, but not by way of limitation, any roadway improvements, sidewalks, storm drainage system, water pipelines, and curbs." The herein conveyed lands and premises were dedicated to the City of South Burlington in an Offer of Irrevocable Dedication from Jolley Associates dated April 6, 1995 and recorded in Volume 378, Page 55 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The above -referenced Warranty Deed was executed in connection with said Offer of Irrevocable Dedication, however said Warranty Deed was not intended to be recorded until the City of South Burlington accepted the conveyed lands and premises. Said Warranty Deed has been inadvertently recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records even though the City has not yet accepted the conveyed lands and premises. This Quitclaim and an Amendment to Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from Jolley Associates to the City of South Burlington dated MAP.,-k i y , 1996 and recorded in Volume :3% Page S-5-10 of the City of South Burlington Land Records are intended to correct any problems caused by the premature recording of the Warranty Deed from Jolley Associates to the City of South Burlington dated April 6, 1995 and recorded June 13, 1995 in Volume 378 Page 61 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein contained, in further aid of this description. 2 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever; and the Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the Grantee, its successors and assigns, that from and after the ensealing of these premises, the Grantor will have and claim no rights, title or interest in or to the property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this instrument to be executed this -J(��- day of 1996. IN PRESENCE OF: i wiinek.s Witness STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By: .1 Its `Duly Auth ized Agent At South Burlington, in said County, this-4k day of April, 1996, personally appeared LC, �,, `,c� , Duly Authorized Agent of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and he/-s#e acknowledged the within instrument, by him/h-e= signed, to be his/h-ar free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. SON076.rea #2682 STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREE'P BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05401 Before me, b Notary u lic PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 April 30, 1996 Robert E. Fletcher, Esquire Stitzel & Page, P.C. P.O. Box 1507 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1507 Re: Jolley Associates Dear Bob: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find executed copies of the following documents: 1. Quit Claim Deed from the City to Jolley Associates. 2. Amendment to Offer of Irrevocable Deciation. If you have any questions, please give me a call. SinceXgly, Rarym d J. Belair, Zoni g and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls r � ; top rtt;rgtc„ tan Row 'Z3,t: �'+rv�. '\ "M6WDMENT TO OFFER OF IRREVOCABLE DEDICATION �reement made this / day of 199,5 by and between JOLLEY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership with a place of business in St. Albans, Vermont ("Owner") and the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON (the "City"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has approved a Site Plan application to construct a 262 square foot addition to Owner's gas station/convenience store, plus a dumpster shed, at 977 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a plan prepared by Schreib Engineering, Inc. entitled "S.B. Collins, Shelburne Road, Site Plan" dated March 12, 1993, last revised April 7, 1994. WHEREAS, in connection with the final approval of the Planning Commission dated April 12, 1994 the Owner executed an Offer of Irrevocable Dedication to the City of South Burlington dated April 6, 1995 and recorded in Volume 378 Page 55 of the City of South Burlington Land Records and an accompanying Warranty Deed conveying a sixty (60) foot wide strip of land, said sixty (60) foot wide strip to be used in the future for roadway and recreation path purposes by the City. (Said strip is depicted on a survey map prepared by Brooks Land Surveying, Inc. entitled "Right of Way Plat, Jolley Associates" dated December 11, 1994 and designated on said survey map as "Revised Location of Right of Way to be Granted to City of South Burlington."). WHEREAS, although the above -referenced Warranty Deed (from Jolley Associates to the City of South Burlington dated April 6, 1995) was not intended to be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records until the City accepted the strip of land, said Warranty Deed was inadvertently recorded on June 13, 1995 in Volume 378 Page 61 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, even though the City has not yet accepted the dedicated strip of land. WHEREAS, the Owner and City desire to correct any problems caused by the premature recording of the above -referenced Warranty Deed. THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, it is covenanted and agreed as follows: 1. City herewith executes and records a quitclaim deed to owner releasing its interest acquired by the inadvertent recording of the Warranty Deed from Jolley Associates to the City of South Burlington dated April 6, 1995 and recorded June 13, 1995 in Volume 378 Page 61 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. 2. Owner herewith delivers to the City a warranty deed, an unexecuted copy of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit Al, said delivery being a formal offer of Irrevocable Dedication to the City, to be held by the City until its acceptance or rejection by the City Council. 3. Owner and City agree that said Exhibit Al shall replace the previous Warranty Deed recorded in Volume 378 Page 61 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. 4. Except as specifically amended above, all other terms and conditions of the Offer of Irrevocable Dedication from Jolley Associates to the City of South Burlington shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner hereby executes this document as of the date first above written. WITN SES: 104 STATE OF VERMONT FRANKLIN COUNTY, SS. OWNER: JOLLEY ASSOCIATES By: &Hjwgnx� Gener4lfPartAer D At St. Albans, this day of AMg 1995, ae4v� 4 gt'� general partner of JOLLEY ASSOCIATES, personally appeared and acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and signed, to be his free act and deed and the . free act and deed of JOLLEY ASSOCIATES. Before me, Not ry Public y,e STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS At South Burlington, in said County, this" day of YZ - � , 1996, personally appeared S ` �Q� .� y A to a, -"�'k' , Dul Authorized Agent of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and he/s-rre acknowledged the within instrument, by him/hQr signed, to be his/ham free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. SON077.rea #2682 Before me, Nota ublic FSa TITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET 7RLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that JOLLEY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership with a place of business in St. Albans, County of Franklin and State of Vermont, Grantor in the consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantee, by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being a portion of the same lands and premises conveyed to Jolley Associates by deed of Lowell T. and Susan G. Spillane dated June 16, 1987 and recorded in Volume 216, Page 320 of the South Burlington Land Records. Reference is made to a survey map prepared by Brooks Land Surveying, Inc. entitled "Right of Way Plat, Jolley Associates," dated December 11, 1994 and recorded in Volume 365, Page 106 ("the Map"). [The Map is based on an earlier survey map prepared by Buck & Pierce entitled "S.B. Collins Inc., Map of Boundary Survey, Shelburne Road, U.S. Rte. Seven, City of South Burlington, Vermont (Project 86038)," dated October 1, 1986 and revised May 17, 1988 and recorded in Volume 252, Page 88.] This subject premises are more particularly described as follows: A strip of land sixty (60) feet, more or less, in uniform width, designated on the Map as "Revised Location of Right of Way to be Granted to City of South Burlington." Beginning at a point in the southerly boundary of property of Howard Juster, Gary and Ann Juster d/b/a Juster Development ("Juster") marked by a concrete monument, which point is S 720 04' 1011 E 250.12 feet from the northwest corner of the Jolley parcel; thence S 180 55' 50" W, a distance of 105.12 feet to a point on the southerly boundary of the Jolley parcel; thence N 700 40' 05" W, along the southerly boundary of the Jolley parcel, a distance of 60 feet to a point; thence N 180 55' 50" E, a distance of 103.65 feet to a point in the southerly boundary of Juster; thence S 720 04' 10" E, a distance of 60.01 feet along the southerly boundary of Juster to the point and place of beginning. Also conveyed are all improvements located on, over and under said property including, but not by way of limitation, any roadway improvements, sidewalks, storm drainage system, water pipelines, and curbs. This Warranty Deed replaces a Warranty Deed from Jolley Associates to the City of South Burlington dated April 6, 1995 and recorded in Volume 378 Page 61 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, which was erroneously recorded prior to the acceptance of the described premises by the City of South Burlington. Reference is hereby made to the following: 1. Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from Jolley Associates to the City of South Burlington dated April 6, 1995 and recorded in Volume 378 Page 55 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. 2. Warranty Deed from Jolley Associates to the City of South Burlington dated April 6, 1995 and recorded in Volume 378 Page 61 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. 3. Quitclaim Deed from the City of South Burlington to Jolley Associates dated , 1995 and recorded in Volume Page of the City of South Burlington Land Records. 4. Amendment to Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from Jolley Associates to the City of South Burlington dated , 1995 and recorded in Volume Page of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein contained, in further aid of this description. MTZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2 171 BATTERY STREET URWNGTON, VERMONT 05401 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Jolley Associates hereunto sets its hand this day of IN PRESENCE OF: STATE OF VERMONT FRANRLIN COUNTY, SS. 1995. JOLLEY ASSOCIATES M At St. Albans, in said County, this day of , 1995, personally appeared and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of JOLLEY ASSOCIATES. Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: SON078.rea #2682 TITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3 171 BATTERY STREET 1RLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 1- csorded in Vol.. :ji). Burlington M STPI'ZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT I.AW 171 BATTERY STREET 3URLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 .�iiK"3') FICS JD 9a on 98ge- nd Recorr 1 'icam ;1;.,ert, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont Municipality located in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantor") for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby RELEASE, REMISE and FOREVER QUITCLAIM unto JOLLEY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership with a place of business in St. Albans, County of Franklin and State of Vermont (the "Grantee") and its successors and assigns forever, a parcel of land which is more particularly described as follows: A parcel of land being all and the same lands and premises conveyed to the City of South Burlington by Warranty Deed of Jolley Associates dated April 6, 1995 and recorded June 13, 1995 in Volume 378, Page 61 of the City of South Burlington Land Records and being described therein as follows: "Being a portion of the same lands and premises conveyed Jolley Associates by deed of Lowell T. and Susan G. Spillane dated June 16, 1987 and recorded in Volume 216, Page 320 of the South Burlington Land Records. Reference is made to a survey map prepared by Brooks Land Surveying, Inc. entitled "Right of Way Plat, Jolley Associates," dated December 11, 1994 and recorded in Volume 365, Page 106 ("the Map"). (The Map is based on an earlier survey map prepared by Buck & Pierce entitled "S.B. Collins Inc., Map of Boundary Survey, Shelburne Road, U.S. Rte. Seven, City of South Burlington, Vermont (Project 86038)," dated October 1, 1986 and revised May 17, 1988 and recorded in Volume 252, Page 88.] This subject premises are more particularly described as follows: A strip of land sixty (60) feet, more or less, in uniform width, designated on the Map as "Revised Location of Right of Way to be Granted to City of South Burlington." STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 Beginning at a point in the southerly boundary of property of Howard Juster, Gary and Ann Juster d/b/a Juster Development ("Juster") marked by a concrete monument, which point is S 72' 04' 10" E 250.12 feet from the northwest corner of the Jolley parcel; thence S 18' 55' 50" W, a distance of 105.12 feet to a point on the southerly boundary of the Jolley parcel; thence N 700 40' 05" W, along the southerly boundary of the Jolley parcel, a distance of 60 feet to a point; thence N 18o 55' 50" E, a distance of 103.65 feet to a point in the southerly boundary of Juster; thence S 72' 04' 10" E, a distance of 60.01 feet along the southerly boundary of Juster to the point and place of beginning. Also conveyed are all improvements located on, over and under said property including, but not by way of limitation, any roadway improvements, sidewalks, storm drainage system, water pipelines, and curbs." The herein conveyed lands and premises were dedicated to the City of South Burlington in an Offer of Irrevocable Dedication from Jolley Associates dated April 6, 1995 and recorded in Volume 378, Page 55 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The above -referenced Warranty Deed was executed in connection with said Offer of. Irrevocable Dedication, however said Warranty Deed was not intended to be recorded until the City of South Burlington accepted the conveyed lands and premises. Said Warranty Deed has been inadvertently recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records even though the City has not yet accepted the conveyed lands and premises. This Quitclaim and an Amendment to Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from Jolley Associates to the City of South Burlington dated MAX(-k 14 , 1996 and recorded in Volume 3%j Page $,-90 of the City of South Burlington Land Records are intended to correct any problems caused by the premature recording of the Warranty Deed from Jolley Associates to the City of South Burlington dated April 6, 1995 and recorded June 13, 1995 in Volume 378 Page 61 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein contained, in further aid of this description. 2 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever; and the Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the Grantee, its successors and assigns, that from and after the ensealing of these premises, the Grantor will have and claim no rights, title or interest in or to the property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this instrument to be executed this t) A day of 1996. IN PRESENCE OF: Wiin'e4s Witness STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, S6. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By: Its Duly Authb4ized Agent At South Burlington, in said County, this. day of April, 1996, personally appeared _,C fL \--�ck -� � A I , Duly Authorized Agent of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and he/ -she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her-signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. SON076.rea #2682 STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 13ATTERY STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 Before me, a Notary u �lic STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET PO BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 STEVEN F. STMEL PATTI R. PAGE- JOSEPH S. McLEAN I•AlSO ADMTntD IN N.Y.) Joseph Weith City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Jolley Associates Dear Joe: (802) 660-2555 (VOICEnDD) FAX (802) 660-2552 April 12, 1996 At long last, please find enclosed documents which are intended to "reverse" the inadvertent filing of the Warranty provided to the City last year. The documents enclosed, and directions with respect to them, are: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E.FLETCHER Deed my 1. Quit Claim Deed from the City to Jolley Associates: w�P. date, sign, notarize and file with the City Clerk. When returned to you by the City Clerk, please send me a copy. 2. Vermont Property Transfer Tax Return - City of South Burlington (Seller) to Jolley Associates (Buyer): insert City's TIN in box at upper right (marked) and have document dated and signed by Chuck. Send me a fully completed version and submit the same to the City Clerk along with the Quit Claim Deed described in paragraph 1 above. 3. Vermont Property Transfer Tax Return - Jolley Associates (Seller) to City of South Burlington (Buyer): insert the same information requested in paragraph 2 above, sign and hold with Warranty Deed. 4. Warranty Deed executed by Jolley Associates: hold until City is ready to take title. 5. Amendment to Offer of Irrevocable Dedication: initial the changed date at the top of page 1, sign, witness, and ; notarize on page 3, where marked, and send me two (2) fully executed copies. F If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. ly'V;, obert Fletcher REF/map Enclosures SON2070.COR 9 STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 I3ATI'ERY STREET PO BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICIJIuu) SITWEN F. SITIZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 PATTI R. PAGE• IOSEPII S. McLEAN (•AL40 ADMrrr D M N.Y.) April 8, 1996 VIA FACSIMILE & FIRST CLASS MAIL Howard J. Seaver, Esq. Greene & Seaver, Inc. 95 St. Paul Street Burlington VT 05401 RE: Jolley Associates -- City of South Burlington Dear Howard: OF COUNSEL ARTI(UR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E. FLETCHER Thank you for the documents on the Jolley Associates/City of South Burlington transaction. Unfortunately, I did not receive the original Property Transfer Tax Returns, I received copies. Please send along the originals and I will forward the entire package to the City. Thanks again. �Sinc r�ly Robert E. Fletcher REF/ cc: J. Weith son2071.cor #2682 9MVEN F. S'IMEL PATTI R. PAGE• JOSEPH S.McLEAN (•ALSO ADMRID IN N.Y.) Howard J. Seaver, Esq. Greene & Seaver, Inc. 95 St. Paul Street Burlington, VT 05401 STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401-5210 (802) 660-2555 (VOICFfMD) FAX (802) 660-2552 March 7, 1996 Re: Jolley Associates - City of South Burlington Dear Howard: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E. FLETCHER I have inquired of the City of South Burlington regarding their desire to retain title to the portion of lands irrevocably offered to the City by Jolley Associates. Joe Weith informs me that at the present time the City is not interested in owning that land. Therefore, it will be necessary for us to "undue" the erroneous filing of the previous Warranty Deed. In early August 1995, Daniel T. Lewbart of this office sent and/or delivered to your office documents necessary to reverse the early filing. Specifically, we provided an Amendment to Offer of Irrevocable Dedication and a new Warranty Deed for the parcel. Please have those documents executed by your client and the other necessary parties, and return the same to me. When I have those documents in hand, I will have the City execute and record the necessary Quitclaim Deed conveying title to the strip of land back to Jolley Associates. I will also record the Amendment referred to above. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Robert E. Fletcher REF/map cc: Joseph Weith SON2046.COR #2682 SFEVEN F. STITZEL PA`M R. PAGE* ('ALSO ADmmm IN N.Y.) Howard J. Seaver, Esq. Greene & Seaver, Inc. 95 St. Paul Street Burlington, VT 05401 STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATI RY STREET BURLINGTON, VERNIONT 0540 1 -52 10 (sot) 660-2555 (VOICErrDD) FAX (802) 660-2552 December 61 1995 Re: Jolley Associates - City of South Burlington Dear Howard: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBER'r E. FLEFCHER I believe that when this matter was last discussed with your Office Dan Lewbart may have been involved. Since then, Dan has left and I have inherited the Jolley Associates matter. In order to correct for the erroneously recorded Warranty Deed I propose that the City of South Burlington quitclaim its interests to Jolley Associates in exchange for delivery by Jolley Associates of a new, fully executed, Warranty Deed. The quitclaim would be recorded and the new Warranty Deed would be held pending the exercise by the City of its rights under the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication. Please advise whether this would be acceptable. If so, this office will undertake to prepare the quitclaim deed for your review. sincere , f Rober E. etcher REF/map cc: Joseph Weith SON1949.COR �1 State of Vermont DEFERRAL OF PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED: 18 V.S.A. 1218-1220 and Environmental,. Protection Rules, Chapter 3-- Subdivisions, 3.06 Deferral of Permit PERMIT NO.: DE-4-2066 APPLICANT & ADDRESS: Jolly Associates 54 Lower Welden St. St. Albans, VT 05478 LOCATION OF SUBDIVISION: Off Shelburne Road in the city DESCRIPTION OF SUBDIVISION: Retain Lot 2 a .14 acre parcel 2067. CONDITIONS: of South Burlington, Verme-,y with Lot 3 retained under (1) The deed for a parcel purchased under the provisions of this permit must include the following "Waiver of Development Rights." All subsequent deeds, leases or contracts of sale must also contain the waiver unless a subdivision permit is obtained. Notice of the purchaser's name and address must be filed with the Wastewater Management Division. "WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENTAL RIGHTS" "In order to comply with the State of Vermont. Environmental Protection Rules on the subdivision of lands and disposal of waste including sewage, the grantee shall not construct or erect a structure or building on the parcel of land conveyed herein, the useful occupancy of which will require the installation of plumbing and sewage treatment facilities or convey this land without first complying with said State regulations. The grantee by acceptance of this deed acknowl<dges that this lot may not qualify for approval for development ender the appropriate environmental protection or health regulations and the State may deny an application to develop the lot." l DE-4-2066 Page 2 Deferral of Permit (2) If the parcel being acquired is to be considered for building development at some future date, the purchaser understands that the information required by Section 3-08 of the rules must be submitted for evaluation. If such information does not meet the Environmental Protection Rules, permission to building on the lot will be denied. (3) The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for recording this permit and the "Notice of Permit Recording" in the city of South Burlington Land Records within 30 days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this /ITAday of Q 1995. c For the Record South Burlington South Burlington DE-4-2067 EC-4-1907 WW-4-0869 Schreib Engr. William C. Brierly, Commissioner Dep, ment of Environmental Conservation B Ir ne L. Roberge Administrative Secretary Planning Commission Selectboard State of Vermont DEFERRAL OF PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED: 18 V.S.A. 1218-1220 and Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 3- Subdivisions, 3.06 Deferral of Permit PERMIT NO.: DE-4-2067 APPLICANT & ADDRESS: Jolly Associates 54 Lower Welden St. St. Albans, VT 05478 LOCATION OF SUBDIVISION: Off Shelburne Road in the city DESCRIPTION OF SUBDIVISION: Retain Lot 3 a .43 acre parcel 2066. CONDITIONS: of South Burlington, Vermont. with Lot 2 retained under DE-4- (1) The deed for a parcel purchased under the provisions of this permit must include the following "Waiver of. Development Rights." All subsequent deeds, leases or contracts of sale must also contain the waiver unless a subdivision permit is obtained. Notice of the purchaser's name and address must be filed with the Wastewater Management Division. "WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENTAL RIGHTS" "In order to comply with the State of Vermont Environmental Protection Rules on the subdivision of lands and disposal of waste including sewage, the grantee shall not construct or erect a structure or building on the parcel of land conveyed herein, the useful occupancy of which will require the installation of plumbing and sewage treatment facilities or convey this land without first complying with said State regulations. The grantee by acceptance of this deed acknowledges that this lot may not qualify for approval for development under the appropriate environmental protection or health regulations and the State may deny an application to develop the lot." DE-4-2067 Page 2 Deferral of Permit (2) If the parcel being acquired is to be considered for building development at some future date, the purchaser understands that the information required by Section 3-08 of the rules must be submitted for evaluation. If such information does not meet the Environmental Protection Rules, permission to building on the lot will be denied. (3) The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for recording this permit and the "Notice of Permit Recording". in the city of South Burlington Land Records within 30 days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. i Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this/ 71day of 1995. c For the Record South Burlington South Burlington DE-4-2066 EC-4-1907 WW-4-0869 Schreib Engr. William C. Brierly, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation B y�-—� ) w) - Irene L. Roberge Administrative Secretary Planning Commission Selectboard State of Vermont WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Case #: WW-4-0869 Environmental Protection Rul Applicant: Jolley Associates Effective September 10, 1981' Address: 54 Lower Welden Street St. Albans, Vermont 05478 This project, consisting of a 262.5 square foot addition to pre-existing gasoline service station with 4 islands of pumps the lot approved in Subdivision Permit EC-4-1907 located o, Route 7 in the city of South Burlington, Vermont is here.,. approved under the requirements of the regulations named above: subject to the following conditions. GENERAL 1. The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Project 829-1 Sheet 1 of 1 "Site Plan" dated March 12, 1993 la,:. revised April 18, 1995 prepared by Schreib Engineering, Inc. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 2. No alterations to the building other than those indicated on the approved plan or Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit, which would change or affect the exterior water supply or wastewater disposal or the approved use of the building shall be allowed without prior review and approval from the Agency of Natural Resources. 3. A copy of the approved plans and this Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. 4. In the event of a transfer of ownership (partial or whole) of this project, the transferee shall become permittee and be subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-0869 Page 2 5. The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the sewage and water systems for public buildings under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 61 - Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit. 6. All conditions set forth in Subdivision Permit #EC-4-1907 dated July 19, 1995 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. WATER SUPPLY 7. The project is approved for water supply by connection to the municipal water system. No other means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division. WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 8. The project is approved for connection to the South Burlington wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 1460 gallons of sewage per day. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 19th day of July, 1995. William C. Brierley, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation B Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer c For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington Selectboard Department of Labor and Industry Schreib Engineering, Inc. State of Verniont SUBDIVISION PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Case: EC-4-1907 Environmental Protection Rules Applicant: Jolley Associates Effective September 10, 1982 Address: 54 Lower Welden Street St. Albans, Vermont 05478 This project, consisting of a three lot subdivision identified as lot 1, being 1.17 acres in size with the existing structure referenced in Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4- 0869, and lot 2, being 0.14 acre and lot 3, being 0.43 acre subject to Deferral of Permits DE-4-2066 and DE-4-2067 respectively located off Shelburne Road in the city of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL 1. The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Project 829-1 Sheet 1 of 1 "Site Plan" dated March 12, 1993 last revised April 18, 1995 prepared by Schreib Engineering, Inc. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 2. Each prospective purchaser of the lot shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan and this Subdivision Permit prior to conveyance of the lot. 3. Lot 1 has been reviewed and is approved with an existing structure referenced in Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-0869. No other buildings are allowed without prior review and approval by the Agency, and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. 4. Lots 2 and 3 shall be subject to the terms and conditions of Deferral of Permits DE-4-2066 and DE-4-2067 respectively, including the "waiver of developmental rights" contained therein. Subdivision Permit EC-4-1907 Page 2 5. The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the L-re mlt:.tee and all assigns and successors in interest. The pp.�� iuittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permif. raga the "Notice of Permit Recording" in the .South Burliagt.ork Land Records within 30 days of issuance of this perm1 i ane, prior to the conveyance of any lot subject�, jurisdiction of this permit. 6. All conditions set forth in Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit #WW-4-0869 dated July 19, 1995 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. WATER SUPPLY 7. Lot 1 is approved for water supply by connection t V the municipal water system. No other means of obtaining pollablr,: water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division. WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 8. The lot is approved for wastewater disposal by connect,iun. t"C, the municipal sewer system. No other method of wastawat:.er disposal shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division, and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms applicable laws and regulations. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 19th day of July, 1995. William C. Brierley, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer c For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington Selectboard Schreib Engineering, Inc. �w r, `h State e ion �- tr .r ��1 r s � , • Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council June 29, 1995 JOLLEY ASSOCIATES 54 Lower Welden Street St. Albans, VT 05478 Dear Applicant: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCF', Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Telephone #(802)879-6563 Subject: WW-4-0869 ; addition of 262.5 square feet to an existing building mun/ws 1460 gpd; no increase in flows located SHELBURNE ROAD in SOUTH BURLINGTON, Vermont. We received your completed application for the referenced permit on 06/22/95, including a fee of $100 paid for by Check Number 002482. This application falls under the Water/Wastewater: Less than 500 GPD Program Area, and under the Performance Standards for this program area, we have 30 days of 'in-house' time for our review of your application. The information contained in your application has been forwarded to the Permit Specialist and an Act 250 District Coordinator. If not included with this letter, a Project Review Sheet will be sent under separate cover. A Project Review Sheet indicates other State agencies and departments you should constact regarding additional permits or approvals you may need under their programs. If you have questions relating to Act 250 jurisdiction, a District Coordinator may be reached at 879-6563 for Chittenden, Franklin, Grand Isle and Addison Counties. If you have questions relating to other department and agency jurisdictions, you can reach the Permit Specialist at this office. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 30 days in-house, please contact this office. Subdivision permit EC-4-1907 and Deferral of Permits DE-4-2066 and DE-4-2067 will be issued with this Wastewater permit. f incerely, �e4n Administrative Secretary c: SOUTH BURLINGTON Planning Commission SOUTH BURLINGTON Selectboard SCHREIB ENGINEERING Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/N. Springfield/St. Johnsbury GREENE & SEAVER, INC. ATTORNEYS May 31, 1995 Steven F. Stitzel, Esq. Stitzel & Page, P.C. 171 Battery Street Burlington, VT 05401 95 ST. PAUL STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TELEPHONE (802) 863-4453 TELECOPIER (802) 658-6518 BENNETT EVANS GREENE HOWARD J. SEAVER Re: Jolley Associates - Southland Enterprises - City of South Burlington (977 Shelburne Rd., So. Burlington) Dear Steve: I have finally received the Easement Agreement from Peter Doremus, executed by Southland, etc., relinquishing the old easement. Enclosed is a copy (I have sent the original to the City Clerk for recording). This means that you may release from escrow the documents I delivered to you on April 7 (Offer of Irrevocable Dedication, etc.), and deliver them to the City. As you recall, Jolley's ability to obtain a zoning/building permit (for an addition to its present building and a dumpster) was conditioned upon delivery of these documents to the City. Per Joe Weith's suggestion, Jolley has already submitted an application for the permit. Therefore, it is my understanding that the permit will now be approved. Also as you recall, you felt that a State subdivision permit would be needed in connection with the ultimate conveyance of the roadway by deed to the City (if and when the City accepts the roadway pursuant to the offer of dedication). Jolley is in the process of assembling the material to apply for that permit. I will let you know when it has been issued, so that the pertinent information can be inserted on the VPTR. Very truly yours, Howard Jeeaver HJS/ enclosure cc: Joe Weith (w/out enclosure) Stephen D. Smith City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 28, 1994 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: Addition, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the April 12, 1994 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that you obtain a zoning/building permit within six (6) months of the approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. a �,L be Weith, ity Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658.7955 February 17, 1995 Steve Stitzel, Esquire 171 Battery Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Steve: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are some draft documents from Peter Doremus regarding the road r.o.w. over the Jolley Associates property on Shelburne Road (i.e. Mobil). Please look these over and let me know if they are satisfactory. The intent of the condition is for the City to acquire fee simple ownership of the r.o.w. Jolley Associates seemed to be supportive of this condition because it would split their parcel into two (2) separate parcels. Therefore, shouldn't we have a warranty deed instead of an easement deed? S' erely, Jo Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encls DOREMUS A.SSOCZATES ATCORNF:YS AND COIINSI:LLORS AT LAW WATI;ILrxONT PLACE ONE TWELVE LAKE STREET 131TRIANGTON, W O5101 (Itu2) s<oa :x:ua (FAX) cra-rays YF:T1:R M. DORF.MUS STF:VNNJ. KANTOR MARK A. CROW* MAITHEWT. DALY *Ai.so ,X *mrrmn) IN CA Steven Stitzel, Esquire Stitzel & Page 171 Battery Street, Second Floor Burlington, VT 05401 Mr. Joseph Weith City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 February 15, 1995 Re: Jolley Associates/City of South Burlington Dear Steve and Joe: LEGAL ASSISTANT MANY A. 11111TENLOCK Enclosed please find copies of proposed Irrevocable Offer of Dedication, Easement Deed and Property Transfer Tax Return relative to the above. Please get back to me with comments. Thanks. Sincerely yours, DOREMUS ASSOCIATES Peter M. Doremus Enclosure IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION OWNER: Jolley Associates (a Vermont general partnership) P. O. Box 611 54 Lower Welden Street St. Albans, VT 05478 3 CITY: City of South Burlington 0 WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has approved Owner's Site Plan L application to construct a 262 square foot addition to Owner's gas station/convenience store, plus a dumpster shed, at 977 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a plan prepared by Colt ` v Schreib Engineering, Inc., entitled "S. B. Collins, Shelburne Road, Site Plan" dated March i 3 12, 1993, last revised April 7, 1994. v A C WHEREAS, the Findings of Facts and Decision of the City Planning Commission, dated April 29, 1994, contains the condition that prior to the issuance of a zoning/building permit for the addition and shed ("the Zoning/Building permit"), Owner shall give to City..------) an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for a sixty (60) foot wide easement or roadway purposes across the central portion of Owner's property ("the Easement") which could be used to continue the proposed easement on the Pomerleau (Southland Enterprises) property to the K-Mart (Justgold) property. WHEREAS, the Easement is to be dedicated to the City free and clear of all encumbrances, conditioned on the issuance of the Zoning/Building permit. WHEREAS, Owner has delivered a warranty deed of conveyance to the City for the Easement. THEREFORE, in consideration of the issuance of the Zoning/Building permit, and in further consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars paid by the City to the Owner, and for other good and valuable consideration, it is covenanted and agreed as follows: 1. Owner herewith delivers to the City a warranty deed and Vermont Property Transfer Tax Return, copies of which are annexed hereto, said delivery constituting a formal Irrevocable Offer of Dedication to the City, to be held by the City until its acceptance or rejection by the City Council. 2. Owner agrees that the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication is irrevocable and can be accepted by the City at any time, provided that the Zoning/Building permit is issued by the appropriate agency of the City. 3. Execution of this Irrevocable Offer of Dedication and the Deed and Vermont Property Transfer Tax Return shall impose no obligation upon Owner to pay for or construct any improvements in connection with the Easement. 4. This Irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall run with the Easement land and shall be binding upon Owner and its heirs, successors and assigns as owners of the land. Dated: WITNESSES: STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY, SS ,19 Los JOLLEY ASSOCIATES At , this day of , 19_, , personally appeared and acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and signed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of JOLLEY ASSOCIATES. Before me, NOTARY PUBLIC 4 CONSENT BY VERMONT NATIONAL BANK Vermont National Bank (as mortgagee to Jolley Associates) hereby consents to the foregoing Irrevocable Offer of Dedication, and shall recognize it in the event the mortgaged premises are transferred to them by foreclosure or transfer in lieu of foreclosure. Dated: , 19—. WITNESSES: VERMONT NATIONAL BANK Its Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS At , this day of , 19 , , personally appeared and acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and signed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of VERMONT NATIONAL BANK. Before me, NOTARY PUBLIC CONSENT OF SOUTHLAND ENTERPRISES, INC. Southland Enterprises, Inc. hereby consents to the foregoing Irrevocable Offer of Dedication. Dated: , 19 WITNESSES: STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS SOUTHLAND ENTERPRISES, INC. By: Its Authorized Agent At , this day of , 19_, , personally appeared and acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and signed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of SOUTHLAND ENTERPRISES, INC. Before me, 06a7`'18: o EASEMENT DEED GRANTOR: Jolley Associates (a Vermont general partnership) P. O. Box 611 54 Lower Welden Street St. Albans, VT 05478 GRANTEE: City of South Burlington THE PROPERTY: Located in South Burlington, Chittenden County, Vermont, described as follows: Being a portion of the same lands and premises conveyed to Jolley Associates by deed of Lowell T. and Susan G. Spillane dated June 16, 1987 and recorded in Volume 216, Page 320 of the South Burlington Land Records. Reference is made to a survey map prepared by Brooks Land Surveying, Inc. entitled "Right of Way Plat, Jolley Associates," dated December 11, 1994 and recorded in Volume , Page ("the Map"). [The Map is based on an earlier survey map prepared by Buck & Pierce entitled "S. B. Collins, Inc., Map of Boundary Survey, Shelburne Road, U. S. Rte. Seven, City of South Burlington, Vermont (Project 86038)," dated October 1, 1986 and revised May 17, 1988 and recorded in Volume 252, Page 88.] This subject premises are more particularly described as follows: The portion of the Jolley Associates property designated on the Map as "Revised Location of Right of Way to be Granted to City of South Burlington." Beginning at a point in the southerly boundary of property of Howard Juster, Gary and Ann Juster d/b/a Juster Development ("Juster") marked by a concrete monument, which point is S 72' 04' 10" E 250.12 feet from the northwest corner of the Jolley parcel; thence S 18' 55' 50" W, a distance of 105.12 feet to a point on the southerly boundary of the Jolley parcel; thence N 70' 40' 50" W, along the southerly boundary of the Jolley parcel, a distance of 60 feet to a point; thence N 18' 55' 50" E, to a point in the southerly boundary of Juster; thence S 72' 04' 10" E, a distance of 60.01 feet along the southerly boundary of Juster to the point of beginning. The Easement: The right to construct, maintain, repair and replace a roadway over the Property. IN CONSIDERATION of Ten and more Dollars, paid by Grantee to Grantor's full satisfaction, Grantor gives, grants, sells, conveys and confirms the Easement to Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement with all privileges and appurtenances, to Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever. Grantor, for Grantor and Grantor's heirs, executors, administrators and successors, covenants with Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns, that: a. Until the execution of this Deed, Grantor is sole owner of the Property and has good right and title to convey the Easement in the manner described in this Deed. b. The Easement is free from every encumbrance, except: 1. Mortgage to Vermont National Bank dated December 15, 1986 and recorded in Volume 238, Page 291; and 2. Easement Agreement with Southland Enterprises, Inc. dated , 1995 and recorded in Volume , Page Grantor agrees to warrant and defend the aforesaid against all lawful claims whatever. Dated: , 19 WITNESSES: STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY, SS JOLLEY ASSOCIATES At , this day of , 19_, personally appeared and acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of JOLLEY ASSOCIATES. Before me, NOTARY PUBLIC I CONSENT BY VERMONT NATIONAL BANK Vermont National Bank (as mortgagee to Jolley Associates) hereby consents to the foregoing Easement Deed, and shall recognize it in the event the mortgaged premises are transferred to them by foreclosure or transfer in lieu of foreclosure. Dated: , 19 . WITNESSES: VERMONT NATIONAL BANK Its Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS At , this day of , 19 , , personally appeared and acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and signed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of VERMONT NATIONAL BANK. Before me, NOTARY PUBLIC CONSENT OF SOUTHLAND ENTERPRISES, INC. Southland Enterprises, Inc. hereby consents to the foregoing Easement Deed. Dated: 19 . WITNESSES: STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS SOUTHLAND ENTERPRISES, INC. Its Authorized Agent At , this day of , 19_, , personally appeared and acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and signed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of SOUTHLAND ENTERPRISES, INC. Before me, NOTARY PUBLIC VERMONT PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1401 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) ffjSELLER'S (TRANSFEROR'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER (DENT. NO. Jolley Associates P. 0. Box 671 03-0267518 St. Albans, VT 05478 = BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER IDENT. NO. City of South Burlington PROPERTY LOCATION (Address In full) • DATE OF CLOSING 977 Shelburne Road So. Burlington INTEREST IN PROPERTY 1" ❑ FEE SIMPLE 3. ❑ UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST 5. ❑ TIME-SHARE ESTATE 7. ® EASEMENT 2. ❑ LIFE ESTATE 4. ❑ UNDIVIDED % INTEREST S. ❑ LEASE 8. ❑ OTHER FRONTAGE AND DEPTH TOTAL ACREAGE 60 feet x /OS- feet 0. 14 acre BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY). 1. ® NONE 5. ❑ BARN 9.0 STORE 2. ❑ FACTORY 6. ❑ MULTI -FAMILY WITH _ ( NSERT )DWELLING UNITS WE] OTHER TRANSFERRED oEaclV SE 3. El SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. ❑MOBILE HOME /aUueEA 4. ❑ CAMPNACATION HOME 8. ❑ CONDOMINIUM WITH ( ) UNITS TRANSFERRED rNwe[R CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER ❑ OCCUPIED ❑ RENTED ❑ WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMP/VACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. ❑ OTHER 2. © OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENTUSEB. ❑ INDUSTRIAL oesctiec PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL ® Road 9. OTHER 0[BCRIeE DlaCNe! 2. ❑ OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USER. ❑ INDUSTRIAL DeSCRASE IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER CHAPTER 124 OF 32 V.SA (Agricultural, Forest, Farmland or Working Farmland Tax Abatement Use Value Appraisal Programa)7 ❑ Yes ® No IF TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N and O BELOW. 2. Transfer to a municipality TOTAL PRICE PAID FOR • PRICE PAID FOR PRICE PAID $ PERSONAL PROPERTY f _ REAL PROPERTY S IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE - " ENTER FAIR MARKET VALUE ON LINE 0 AND DESCRIBE THE CIRCUMSTANCES: TAX DUE: Enter amount from rate schedule on reverse aide. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS = • DATE SELLER ACQUIRED June 16, 1986 _ IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET 1 He i d m CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDE than 6 ycars TO WN/CITY DATE OF RECORD BOOK NUMBER THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK PAGE NO. LISTED VALUE f GRAND LIST OF 19 PARCEL ID OR MAP NO. GRAND LIST CATEGORY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND, IF REQUIRED, ACT 250 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) AND TAX PAID. SIGNED DATE CLERK TOWN NUMBER Dre Form PT-1 (12/92) RATE SCHEDULE 1. Tax on Spsclal Rote Property: a. Value of purchaser's principal residence (not to exceed $100,000) (See Instructbns).._._._._._........»._................_...... 1. a $ b. Value of property enrolled In current use program ........_..._......._._._._._._...__._._.».»..-.-....»._. _ ._._ b. $ c. Value of qualified working form........................................._.»...._.._._._...._._._._._..»._._.».». _...._...._._._.......... Y _._._ c. $ d. Add tines 1(a), (b) and (c).».»...._.......»...................»._...._._._...._._...._._._._._.»._...._.»._._._._._._._._....»._._._.......� ._._ d. $ e. Tax rate.....»._.._.»._._._...._..................._.........._............._._............._._._._._._._.».»...._.__.»._....--._...._._._.......». �__._ e. f. Tax due on Spoclal Rate Property-. Multiply Line i (d) by Line 1(a).......... .-.............. .... ._.--......... ....... _ _ _._._ I. S 2. Tax on Gorham! Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Line O on front of return ................. .».__._...._. --- _.-.......--------- ---------- _ _ 2. e. $ b. Enter amount from Una 1(d) of Rate Schedule above ......................................... __._._....------------------- _ _.»._ b. $ c. Subtract Une 2(b) from Line 2(a)....._.»..............................._._...._._...._._._._._.».......»._._._._._._.»._._._._._.__._.____ c. $ d. Tax rete.._._.»._._.».»._._...._._.......»._._._........................._._._.»._._...._._.»._._._...._...._._. »»._._._._.._._ ._...._....� ._._ d. e. Tax due on General Raft Property. Multiply Line 2(c) by Lino . ................_-_._._ e. $ 3. Total Tax Due: Add tines 1(f) and 2(e) and enter here and on Line P on front of return .......................................................... ..»._ 3. b FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES Buyers) and Sollor(s) certify as follows: - A. That they have Investigated and dlaclosed to every party to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, If any, affecting the property. B. That the seller(*) advised the buyer(*) that local and state building regulations, zoning regulations and subdivision regulations pertaining to the property may Ilmtt significantly the use of the property. C. That this transfer Is In compliance with or Is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. and is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel Is exempt from the subdivision regulations because (as* Instructions for exemptions): EAs ement a. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number Number of acres b. Parcel retalnod: Exemption Number Number of acres Please contact the district office In your area to determine compliance with Act 250. (See map on page 26.) Sellers) further cortifles as follows: D. That this transfer of real pprroperty and any development thereon Is In compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Land Use and Development Law (Act 250), for a following reason: 1. This property Is the subject of Act 250 Permit No. and Is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property is exempt from Act 250 because: (Ilst exemption number from Instructions) Easement E. That this transfor does not (strike one) ►esutt In a partition or division of land. Note: if It does, an Act 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached to this return before f111ng with the town clerk. ■❑ 0� WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION Buyer(s) certifies that Vermont Income tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remitted to the Commissioner of Taxes with Form REW-1 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer Is exempt from Income tax withholding for the following reason (check one): 1. Seller(s) certifies that at that time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. 2. Buyer(s) certifies that the parties obtained withholding certificate of Taxes In advance of this sale. from the Commissioner ❑ 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this Is a transfer without consideration. (See Instructions for Form REW-1.) ❑ 4. Seller(s) is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee In a foreclosure or transfer in lieu of foreclosure, with no additional consideration. WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIFICATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE. SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BUYER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE Preparer's Signature reeve & Seaver, Inc. 5 St. Paul Street Preparer'sAddreu Burlington, VT 05401 Prepared by Howard J . Seaver Buyer's Representative Howard J. SeayEFt•I. 863-4453 (Print or Type) --. wrr .,, .,,,o , .w fur your recorus. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 10, 1994 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: 6 Month Extension, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that the South Burlington Planning Commission at their August 9, 1994 meeting granted your request for a six (6) month extension to the site plan approval granted on April 12, 1994. This approval was for a 262 square foot addition to a convenience store with gas sales and a 12'x 24' dumpster shed. This approval now expires on April 12, 1995. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S' e Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 54 Lower Welden Street P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 802 527-0116 • 893-7744 August 4, 1994 Mr. Joe Weith City Planner City of South Burlington Planning Commission 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Addition, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Weith: "JLEY ASSOCIATES In reference to the April 12, 1994, site plan application of Jolley Associates to construct a 262 square foot addition to a convenience store with gas sales and a 12' x 24' dumpster shed at 977 Shelburne Road, we would like to request a six month extension. This is due to lenghty negotiations with Mr. Pomerleau regarding the right of way on the rear of the property. If you have any questions about this issue, please feel free to call me. Thank you for your time in this matter and I hope to hear from you soon. Sincere y, S ylg� Stephen D. Smith Operations Manager SDS:llg Retailer of Petroleum Products State of Vermont AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Department of Fish and Wildlife Hazardous Materials Management Division Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation 103 South Main Street/West Office Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0404 Natural Resources Conservation Council (802) 241-3888 RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED FAX (802) 244-5141 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD April 26, 1994 Carl Ruprecht S.B. Collins, Inc. 54 Lower Weldon St. St. Albans, VT 05478 RE: Petroleum contamination at Shelburne Rd. Mobil North (Site ##94-1589) Dear Mr. Ruprecht: The Sites Management Section (SMS) has received the January 18, 1994 report outlining the subsurface assessment for the above referenced site, conducted by Jefferson P. Hoffer, Consulting Hydrogeologist. This report summarizes the degree and extent of contamination encountered during the assessment on October 20, 1993. Four underground storage tanks (USTs) owned by S.B. Collins, Inc. were removed. Soils screened in the tank bed of UST-1 had peak concentrations of 184 ppm as measured by a photoionization detector (PID). Due to a malfunction of the PID, no additional soil screenings were performed during the removal of the remaining three tanks. A total of 80 cubic yards of petroleum contaminated soil was stockpiled onsite. Groundwater was encountered at approximately five feet below the ground surface. In addition to the two existing leak detection monitoring wells, five groundwater monitoring wells were installed at the site on November 11, 1993. Groundwater sampling shows high concentrations of BTEX and MTBE compounds in the vicinity of UST-1. No free product was observed throughout the excavation. Based on the above information, the SMS has determined that additional work is necessary at the site in order to determine the severity of contamination present. Therefore, the SMS is requesting that S.B. Collins, Inc. retain the services of a qualified environmental consultant to perform the following: 1. Further define the degree and extent of contamination to groundwater at this site. This can be accomplished by installing additional monitoring wells and have these wells along with the existing wells sampled and analyzed for BTEX and MTBE compounds. 2. Continue to ensure that any adjacent sensitive receptors are not impacted by the contamination. This should include basements of adjacent buildings, nearby surface water, and any public or private drinking water wells which are located within the vicinity of the site. If any water supplies appear at risk from this contamination, they Chlorine Free 100% Recyded Paper Regional Office - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/N. Springfield/St. Johnsbury should be sampled and analyzed using EPA 8020. 3. Develop a plan to treat and/or monitor the stockpiled soils. The soils must be located in an area such that they have a low potential to impact nearby receptors. They must also be properly encapsulated in plastic. If the soils are to be moved offsite, the SMS or UST Program must grant permission prior to their transport. 4. Determine the need for a long term treatment and/or monitoring plan which addresses the contamination present at the site. The need for such a plan should be based on the results of the above investigations. 5. Submit to the SMS a summary report which outlines the work performed as well as providing conclusions and recommendations. Included should be detailed well logs, analytical data, site map, area map, and a groundwater contour map. - Please have your consultant submit a preliminary work plan and cost estimate within fifteen days of your receipt of this letter so that it may be approved prior to the initiation of onsite work. The underground storage tanks at Shelburne Rd. Mobil North are covered by the Petroleum Cleanup Fund as set forth in 10 V.S.A. Section 1941. An owner or permittee of an underground storage tank, who is not in significant violation of his or her permit, is eligible for reimbursement from the fund. The owner or permittee must pay for the removal or repair of the failed tank and for the first $10,000 of the cleanup; after that the fund will reimburse the tank owner or permittee for additional cleanup costs up to $1 million. Additionally, the Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources reserves the right to seek cost recovery of fund monies spent at the site if the Secretary concludes that S.B. Collins, Inc. was in significant violation of the Vermont Underground Storage Tank statute (10 V.S.A., Chapter 59). If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Chuck Schwer, Supervisor Sites Management Section cc: Jefferson P. Hoffer, Consulting Hydrogeologist South Burlington Selectboard DEC Regional Office jasonf/wp/941589 4/12/94 MOTION OF APPROVAL JOLLEY ASSOCIATES I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Site Plan application of Jolley Associates to construct a 262 square foot addition to a convenience store with gas sales and a 121x 24' dumpster shed, 977 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a plan entitled "S.B. Collins, Shelburne Road, Site Plan" dated March 12, 1993, last revised April 7, 1994, prepared by Schreib Engineering, Inc., with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to permit issuance. a) Additional landscaping shall be added to the plan with a minimum value of $230. b) The plan shall be revised to note that the City of South Burlington will be given an irrevocable offer of dedication for the proposed 60 foot r.o.w. 3. The applicant shall post a landscape bond in the amount of $450. This bond shall be posted prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. 4. This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 1 which allows this property to generate a maximum of 28.4 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. ITE estimates the existing use to generate 68.4 vte's during the P.M. peak hour and with the proposed addition to generate 87.6 vte's. This is a 19.2 vte increase. Pursuant to Section 17.50 of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission may approve peak hour traffic volumes above the normal standards if it determines that other site improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow in the vicinity. It is the Planning Commission's opinion that granting the City a 60 foot r.o.w. across the central portion of the property which could be used to continue the proposed r.o.w. on the adjacent Pomerleau property to the K-Mart property will provide such a benefit. Therefore, the provisions of Section 17.50 are adequately met. 5. The applicant shall contribute $493 prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit to the Shelburne Road Intersection zoning/building permit to the Shelburne Road Intersection Improvement Fund for the 19.2 additional vte's to be generated by this project. 6. The legal document (i.e., irrevocable offer of dedication) for the 60 foot r.o.w. shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Attorney. This document shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to issuance of the zoning/building permit. 7. Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 8. The applicant shall obtain a zoning/building permit within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. 9. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the addition. 10. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. oc ��� cis Memorandum - Planning April 12, 1994 agenda items April 8, 1994 Page 4 5) JOLLEY ASSOCIATES - ADDITION - SITE PLAN This project consists of the construction of a 262 square foot addition to a convenience store with gas sales and a 12'x24' dumpster shed. This project was denied on 12/14/93 (minutes , enclosed). The applicant is proposing to give the City a 60 foot r.o.w. across this property which would connect with the proposed r.o.w. on the adjacent Pomerleau property. This property located at 977 Shelburne Road lies within the Cl District. It is bounded on the north by the K-Mart Plaza, on the west by undeveloped land, on the south by Burger King and undeveloped land and on the east by Shelburne Road. Access/circulation: Access is provided via two (2) 36 foot wide curb cuts on Shelburne Road. No access changes proposed. Circulation is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 6.5% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 41.5% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 66.1% (maximum allowed is 30%). This is an existing situation which will not be made worse by this application. Setback requirements are met. Parking: This site requires a total of 13 parking spaces and 17 spaces are available. The available spaces include two (2) spaces at each of the four (4) pump islands and nine (9) spaces along the southerly boundary. One (1) of these spaces should be indicated for handicapped use. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement for this project, rilds`�" based on building cost, is $450 which is not being met. Plan should be revised to show additional landscaping to meet the requirement. Staff recommends this landscaping be planted near the storage sheds. Traffic: This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 1 which allows this property to generate a maximum of 28.4 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. I.T.E. uses two (2) methods to estimate trip generation for this type of use, gross 4 Memorandum - Planning April 12, 1994 agenda items April 8, 1994 Page 5 floor area and number of pumps. Based on gross floor area the use currently generates 68.4 vte's and based on pumps it generates 82.4 vte's. This addition will increase trips, based on gross floor area, by 19.2 vte's to 87.6 vte's. Since no pumps will be added the trip end estimate based on pumps will not change. The applicant is proposing to give the City a 60 foot r.o.w. across the central portion of this property which could be used to continue the proposed r.o.w. on the adjacent Pomerleau property onto the K-Mart property and connect the r.o.w. to Queen City Park Road. It was suggested at the 12/14/93 meeting that providing this r.o.w. might be considered a net benefit to traffic flow and justify allowing the vte limit being further exceeded. Lighting: Exterior lighting consists'of nine (9) 400 watt metal halide lamps on 16 foot poles with cutoff luminaries. Sewer: No additional allocation needed. R.O.W. The plan should be revised to note that an irrevocable offer of dedication will be given the City for the proposed r.o.w. The applicant should submit a copy of the irrevocable offer of dedication for review and approval by the City Attorney. This document should be recorded prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. This r.o.w., when accepted by the City, will split this lot in two resulting in a developable lot in the back. 5 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 28, 1994 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: Addition, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on April 12, 1994. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning/building permit be obtained within six (6) months of the approval date. If you have any questions, please give me a call. SIn erely, J e Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp rw�wr uir..� aro w.n Nrw swam w iau / I I I / / Ram i I 30UTH BURLTiIGTON LEGEND ma►arr uwa MO/T-OF�11Y LANDSCAPE nr vo.sa� a w • ® auwo a awl ♦ � SITE PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE t0 /0 0 )0 M .O .0 1N � BURGER I@IG RECEIVED APR 1 11994 City of So. Burlington COVERAGE 011M KTK M/ MOITON 1.�1 q R RTK A�Dr1 lAl q R FlOWT OOIIrAO[ ♦N NT.t OO�At I.S PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning 14 December 1993, at 7:30 pm, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: 14 DECEMBER 1993 Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, in the Conference Room, City Hall, William Burgess, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, David Austin, Terrence Sheahan, William Craig, Mac Teeson Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Mark Eldridge, Thomas Tavares, Mary Provencher, Steve Smith, Gregg Beldock, Elizabeth Gretkowski, Bob McCarroll, Michael Sheridan, Mark Thibault, Art Shields, Cindy Provost 1. Other Business: a. Mr. Weith updated members on the Heathcote appeal. The Commission had denied the application because they felt there wasn't a substantial change in circumstances. The applicant asked the Court to rule that there was a change and to reopen the hearing and find in favor of the application. The Judge ruled there was a substantial change and that it should go back to the Commission. It has been scheduled for January. b. Mark Eldridge, the Burlington Planner and a members of the Northern New England & American Planning Association presented the city an award for two projects: the View Protection Overlay District and the City Center Guidelines for Streetscape Design. He noted these were the only awards made this year. c. Mrs. Maher noted that construction debris at Staples Plaza has been dumped over the side of the hill and can be seen from I-89. Mr. Weith will look into this. 2. Continued site plan application of Jolley Associates for con- struction of a 262 sq. ft. addition to an existing 1000 sq. ft. building and construction of a 288 sq. ft. dumpster shed, on a site consisting of a convenience store with gasoline sales, 977 Shel- burne Rd: Mr. Burgess noted the vote had been 3-2 to deny and the hearing had been continued to allow for preparation of a denial motion. Mr. Craig noted the site is 2-1/2 times the VTE which is why he voted against it. Mr. Austin noted that the Pomerleau plan had shown a right of way over this property. He said he might reconsider his vote against if the applicant were willing to consider this. He noted that the Commission can approve plans that exceed the overlay if the applicant does something to mitigate a problem, and he felt this PLANNING COMMISSION 14 DECEMBER 1993 page 2 would meet that criteria. Mr. Smith said it is not his province to make that decision. He felt it would depend on how what Mr. Pomerleau were willing to pay for the right of way. He added that he didn't feel the proposed addition would generate more traffic. Mr. Austin moved that the Planning Commission adopt as its decision the Findings of Fact and Conclusion on the attached document entitled PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON RE• APPLICATION FOR JOLLEY ASSOCIATES and deny the applicant's request to construct a 262 sq. ft. addition to an existing 1000 sq. ft. building and a 288 sq. ft. dumpster shed, on a site consisting of a convenience store with gasoline sales, 977 Shelburne Road. Mr. Craig seconded the motion which passed 3-2 with Mr. Teeson and Mrs. Maher voting against and Mr. Burgess abstaining. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: Final Plat application of Thomas and Nancy Tavares for a boundary line adjustment involving two properties of 11,241 sq. ft. and 21,500 sq. ft. resulting in two reconfigured properties of 18,741 sq. ft. and 14,000 sq. ft., 76 and 80 Shunpike Road: Mr. Tavares said they are squaring up the two properties. They still meet the R-4 zone requirements. They have no intention of building on the back of the lot. Mr. Weith said there were no outstanding issues with the applica- tion. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the final plat ap- plication of Thomas and Nancy Tavares for a boundary line adjustment involving two properties of 11,241 sq. ft. and 21,500 sq. ft. resulting in two reconfigured properties of 18,741 sq. ft. and 14,000 sq. ft., 76 and 80 Shunpike Road, as depicted on a plat entitled "Boundary Survey, Subdivision of Property of Constance Weems, Shunpike Road, South Burlington, Vermont, prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc, dated December, 1981, with a last revision date of November 30, 1993, with the following stip- ulations• 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. It shall be made clear that this approval addresses only the boundary line adjustment between Weems (80 Shunpike Road) and Tavares (76 Shunpike Road). This approval does not involve, in any way, the adjoining property to the north which is owned by Allen & Lynn Currier (74 Shunpike Road) and which appears on this approved plat. 3. The applicant shall submit three copies of the final plat which SHELBURN_ ZOAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEN-IT FORMULA UNDEVELOPED ACRES 458.76 128.44 U;WIC 684.19 acres ZONING R1, R4 and AgRR C1 C2 NUMBER OF NEW TRIPS (P.M. PEAK HOUR) 768 8224 to 13,091 6210 to 9,886 15,202 to 23,745 at total build out Assume a ten year build out period with one fifth in two years.. Therefore, there will be 3040 to 4749 new p.m. peak hour trips added to Shelburne Road in two years or an average of 3895 by, splitting the difference. The total improvement package for off -site spot improvements is estimated at $100,000. (see attached cost estimates) Formula: # of new PM Peak Hour Trip ends / 3895 ='� % x $100,000 = FEE EXAMPLE: Lakewood Associates 310 new p.m. peak hour trip ends / 3895 = 7.95% x $100,000 = $7959 FEE. 1 PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 April 8, 1994 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: Addition, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Acting Fire Chief Dick Ward were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, April 12, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please JW/mcp Encls give me a call. S n erel Jo Weith, Ci y Planner No Text City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658.7955 March 30, 1994 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: Addition, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Assistant Fire Chief Dick Ward and myself. Please respond to these comments, if appropriate, with additional information and/or revised plans by no later than Monday, April 4, 1994. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Since{ely, Rat ohd J. Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp DAVID DUBRUL - 7 LOT SUBDIVISION - PRELIMINARY PLAT --- survey plat should show metes and bounds for the shared driveways/r.o.w.'s. --- applicant should indicate the proposed number of bedrooms per lot so staff can determine sewer allocation needed. --- plan should indicate acreage of wetland on site. --- sheet C-1 should indicate that front setback is measured from the planned r.o.w. --- the plan should show the sewer easement between this property and the connection on Indian Creek property. --- applicant must determine whether a legal agreement is necessary to provide access for lots #1 and #2 from Indian Creek Drive. --- lot sizes on page C-1 are not the same as shown on the subdivision plat, lot sizes must be consistent. MBL ASSOCIATES - RESUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLAN --- plan submitted is acceptable. JOLLEY ASSOCIATES ADDITION - SITE PLAN --- minimum $450 landscaping requirement not being met. --- plan should show proposed r.o.w. --- this item will not be officially scheduled for Planning Commission meeting until check is signed. O'BRIEN BROTHERS - ADDITION & DRIVEWAY - SITE PLAN --- provide existing and proposed front yard coverage of Mobil lot along Kennedy Drive. --- landscape plan should show the curb cut change to the Mobil lot shown on sheet 1. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Dick Ward, Acting Fire Chief, Re: April 12, 1994 agenda items Date: March 31, 1994 SOUTHEAST SUMMIT - REVISED LOT LAYOUT - PROJECT 92039 Plan is acceptable, all other concerns and recommendations as submitted by Chief Goddette will remain unchanged. MYERS PROPERTY - SEVEN (7) LOT SUBDIVISION - PROJECT 89-70 Plan is acceptable, previous comments regarding hydrants and private drives remain unchanged. O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGENCY - 1855 WILLISTON ROAD - PROJECT 90130 Plans originally reviewed by Chief Goddette October 13, 1993. Plan is unchanged and is acceptable. S.B. COLLINS - ROUTE 7 - SHELBURNE ROAD - PROJECT 829-1 Plan amendment provides for better access to the rear of building. Plan is acceptable. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: Preliminary Comments April 12, 1994 Agenda items Date: March 31, 1994 O'BRIEN BROTHERS - WILLISTON ROAD/KENNEDY DRIVE 1. Curb opening on Kennedy Drive shall include a depressed concrete curb. 2. Plan sheet No. 1 should show where the profile on sheet No. 2 is taken. 3. Plans are well done and acceptable. S.B. COLLINS (MOBIL STATION) - SHELBURNE ROAD The existing sidewalk is continuous across both entrances and is entirely within the street r.o.w. The plan shows it within the lot on private property. MYERS ESTATE - DORSET STREET 1. Manhole No. 1 should be moved back to where the clean out is and the clean out eliminated. 2. There should be a 15 foot easement between lot 1 and 2 to have access to M.H. No. 3 for maintenance and for the possibility of intercepting this project and diverting it to Dorset Street when a main is constructed. 3. Lot 5 & 6 deeds shall include access over them to manholes 1 and 2 for maintenance. 4. Dorset Street drives will require culverts. 5. The Indian Creek sign should be moved back out of the way of the Dorset Street sidewalk. SOUTHEAST SUMMIT - DORSET STREET Plan prepared by FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. and dated March, 1994 is acceptable. 1 _t 5T. A' CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone)__L2 Jy&tt) t, (,(zk is 'uVial/ 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone 4T) 3) CONTACT PERSON (((name, address, phone x) A)A�1� 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: g ! 7 cSd• 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S) n V02/lLC i 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, units, maximum height and r floors, square feet per floor) 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES-.; to/ 91 LOT COVERAGE: building Y.; landscaped areas % Z4rS/2-IC building, parking, outside storage % /9L SSa 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings ; �SDOD Landscaping S Other' Site Improvements (please list' with' cost) S_ -- .11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:' 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon ; 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. $1 6 p.m 4-5 p.m. ; 5-6 p.m. . 6-7 p.m. 13 ) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: .14 ) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: DATE OF, SUBMISSION SIGNATURE OF y ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DATE OF HEARING lv jp Oo City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 23, 1994 Steve Smith S . B . Collins P.O. box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: Offer of Irrevocable Dedication Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of a Offer of Irrevocable Dedication (OID) for your information. The OID for the right-of-way across the lot at 977 Shelburne Road would have to follow this same basic format. If you have any questions in the meantime, please give me a call. Since ly, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp 1 Encl V FORM 911 VERMONT WARRANTY DEED TUTBLANX REGISTERED US PATOFFICQ 7ulJle La w Print Puolisheis. R il/and. A.. Llt ut I, NED H. PETTENGILL Of Royalton in the County of Windsor and State of Vermont Grantor , in the consideration of ---------------- Ten and more,---------------------------------- Dollars paid to my full satisfaction by TOWN OF SOU'PIj'A RLINGTON, a municipal corporation located in South Burlington RAC Vermont - in the County of Chittenden and State of . Vermont Grantee by these presents, do freely l6iur, (grant..64. Tanurg Aa lzaafirm unto the said Grantee TOWN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors and assigns forever g a perpetual easement in and under/x=dxuxdaxxaxxheizxx=c}.cn&%ibn2:fo7zu:7, a /certain piece of land in South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as - follows vi x: i A parcel of land within the property lines of the within grantor as outlined in red on a plan entitled "Plan of Sewer Easement, Shelburne Road, No. 1, South Burlington, Vermont" dated Feb- ruary 6, 1969, of record in Volume , Page- of the land records of the Town of South Burlington. Being a portion of the same lands and premises conveyed to the within grantor by Warranty Dead of Alma B. Fournier, dated Feb- ruary 9, 1960, of record in Volume 56, Page 10, of the land records of the Town of South Burlington. The said portion of said land is shown on said plan and is marked thereon"Ned H. Pet- tengill." The said easement shall be a perpetual easement and right of way for the purpose of laying, constructing, building, installing, maintaining, repairing, rebuilding, replacing, operating, and patrolling of a sewer pipe and drainage of/main or conduit under, through, and across the said portion of said premises. The said -right of way shall,_: -for the working'purposes of laying, constructing, building, andfiastalling of sakd'pipe, main, or conduit, shall permit the use of an ayea not exceeding 50 feet in width across the said land, 25 feet -,of iit being located on either side of .the center of said pipe main, or conduit, and the grantee herein, its successors and assigns shall also have the right to use an area of 10 feet parallel with and on either side of the center line of said pipe, main, or conduit for the purposes of maintaining, repairing, rebuilding, or replacing the same, but the said grantee, its successors and assigns shall, in connection with such maintenance, repair all replacing of said pipe, main, or conduit, conduct all operations necessary or incidental thereto in a careful and prudent manner so as to do no unnecessary damage to the said land or any building located thereon or any facility located thereon and shall pay and save harmless the grantor, its heirs or assigns, for all damages occasioned to the grantor, its heirs or assigns in connection with any work or labor or other action that may be required for the maintenance, repair, rebuild- ing, or replacing of such pipe, main, or conduit promptly follow- ing the completion of any such work. The said pipe, main, or conduit shall be installed in the ground, together with a sleeve which shall run completely around the same and completely through the premises of the grantor through which 'the said pipe, main, or conduit is placed,and such construction shall be conducted in a careful and prudent manner so as to guard and protect the premises against breakage thereof,or from any dif- ficulty that may be occasioned through improper workmanship in con nection with such installation. Vol. 96 Page '178 Upon the completion of such work as is required in connection with Vol. 96 Page 179 the exercise of this easement in any manner, the grantee, its successors and assigns shall immediately clean up the surface or premises wherein the said installation or repairing or replacing has been done. No manhole shall be constructed on said premises for any purpose ate ' any time during the existence_of this easement. As part consideration hereof the grantee, its successors and a:.signis, agrees that no restriction upon the location or erection of any building on the said premises shall ever be imposed by re' -son of zoning or any other power on the part of the grantee, whether by statute or otherwise to the and that the grantor, its heirs and j assigns shall hereafter be able to erect and maintain any z;uch buildings as they desire upon 'the said premises without limit:.tion by reason of the rights herein granted, and the said installations,: construction, maintenance, and repair shall not in any way restrict; - or interfere with the erection of any such building or buildings I as the grantor, its heirs or assigns may hereafter desire to crectl upon the said land. As part consideration hereof, the grantee, its successors or as- signs shall provide suitable connections for the connecting of a sewer service or connection from the buildings hereafter erected by the grantor, its heirs or assigns or. said premises and from any land that the grantor now owns contiguous to this area. The agreements and provisions herein shall constitute a covenant running with the land and shall run with the lard ;.or t,. benc- fit of the grantor, the grantee, and their respect"'ve h e rs an- � assigns. I Nothing herein shall preclude the grantee, its successors or assigns from the exercise of its zoning provisions, provided, however, that such provisions shall not be exercised by reason of the lo- cation of the said easement. Reference is hereby made to the above mentioned plan and deed, j the records thereof and the references therein contained further aid of this description. in 3:iuvr nnb SA ?ialb said granted premises, uith all the privileges and ap- purtenances thereof, to the said Grantee . i TOWN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors Aeimand assigns, to their own.use and behoof forever; .lnd I the said Grantor NED H. PETTENGILL for my se 1 f and my heirs, iI executors and administrators, do covenant with the said Grantee (+ TOWN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors heizx and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents I am the sole ouacer of the premises, and have ¢ood risht and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are .72rre 3rntn Eurra C-nrumhr=2-. except as aforesaid; and I Ij l � J 01 "iI ------------ City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 17, 1994 Mr. Steve Smith S.B. Collins P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Dear Steve: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 As we discussed, I am sending you a copy of the approved Pomerleau plan showing a proposed 60 foot wide public r.o.w. ending at your property line. The intent of this r.o.w. is to eventually continue it north over your property and the K-Mart property and connect the r.o.w. to Queen City Park Road. It is planned to eventually create a north -south public road paralleling Shelburne Road to serve the developing land in this area. Enclosed is a conceptual plan showing the north -south roadway from Fayette Drive to Queen City Park Road. Also enclosed is the approved Pomerleau plan which shows the proposed 60 foot r.o.w. I have drawn in red the continuance of this r.o.w. over your property and onto the K-Mart property. This is the concept which was proposed to you by the Planning Commission at the 12/14/$� hearing. Please let me know if you are interested in discussing this issue any further. I would be happy to meet with you at any time. in erel , J Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 14, 1994 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: Addition, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the December 14, 1993 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S n erely, L&q2' J Weith, C ty Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 7, 1994 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O.Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: Addition, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the November 23, 1993 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. 1 cerely, J Weith, Ci y Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp PLANNING COMMISSION 23 November 1993 page 6 9. The a licant shall obtain a Cerrtificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the additions. 10._An_y changes to the site plan shall require approval_ by__the South Burlin ton Plannin Commission. Mr. Craiq seconded. Motion gassed unanimously. 6. Site plan application of Jolley Associates for construction of a 262 sq. ft. addition to an existing 1000 sq. ft. building and construction of a 288 sq. ft. dumpster shed on a site containing a convenience store with gasoline sales, 977 Shelburne Rd: Mr. Smith identified the property as a Mobil Station next to Burger King. A building error resulted in the building being located outisde the canopy, and this plan proposes to correct this. Mr. Austin asked the Planner why he felt that increasing the size of the building wouldn't increase traffic. Mr. Weith said the number of pumps isn't changing. Mr. Craig noted they are already 2-1/2 times the allowable traffic. He felt the proposed addition would increase traffic and that there were other things the applicant could do to correct the situation without an ad- dition. Mr. Austin agreed with Mr. Craig. Mr. Smith noted they could reduce the price of gas and add more traffic and there was nothing the Commission could do about that. Mrs. Maher felt since they weren't adding pumps, it would be OK. Mr. Teeson felt this wouldn't increase traffic. Mr Sheahan agreed with Messrs. Austin and Craig. This resulted in a major- ity in opposition to the proposal. Mr. Austin moved to continue the a plication until 12 14 to allo for the -drafting of a denial motion. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimously.__ 7. Site plan application of Gary Barrett/Barrett's Tree Service for removal of a 2250 sq. ft. storage building, construction of a new 3,730 sq. ft. warehouse building and construction of a 495 sq. ft. second story addition to an existing office building on 2.15 acres of land currently used for a contracting buisness and two single family dwellings: Mr. Barrett said he is buying the next door property. There will be designated parking spaces and he will put in a lot of cedars. The addition won't increase business but will just get their equipment inside. They will add a second story to the office. A couple of sheds on the property are also coming down and the fence will be moved back. The two properties will be joined. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 20, 1993 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: Addition, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the South Burlington Planning Commission's decision relative to your application for an addition at 977 Shelburne Road. This decision was rendered at the Commission's December 14, 1993 meeting. If you have any questions, please give me a call. 7ncrely eith, City Planner JW/mcp �2LI �3 �� �arcx ry- MA 4 Y�9Y ;5 lg �-� --k'� '��v�rt�4-s w�c�•cs w-`_ % r sv-c.i r� --- GRASS -- STORAGE SHED PLANTING ONE GATE DEISEL PUMP D--=l CANOPY I �1 PUMP. TYPICAL i h i 1 AA d, A V k � b MOTION OF APPROVAL S.B. Collins 11/22/93 I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Jolley Associates for construction of a 262 square foot addition to an existing 1,000 square foot building and construction of a 288 square foot dumpster shed on a site consisting of a convenience store with gasoline sales as depicted on a plan entitled "S.B. Collins, Shelburne Road, Site Plan", prepared by Schreib Engineering, Inc. and dated 3/12/93, last revised 11/11/93, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit to show $450 worth of new landscaping in a location and of a species approved by the City Planner. The applicant shall post a $450 landscaping bond prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for the new landscaping to be planted. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the planted landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 3. The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit to show one of the parking spaces as a handicapped space in accordance with ADA guidelines. 4. Three (3) copies of the revised site plan shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 5. All exterior lighting shall be downcasting and shielded so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any new lighting or change to existing lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 6. The applicant shall obtain a zoning/building permit within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. 7. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the addition. 8. Any changes to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. (mo-sbc) Memorandum - Planning November 23, 1993 agenda items November 19,1993 Page 5 Lighting: Existing lighting consists of two (2) pole mounted 400 watt metal halide flood lights. Staff recommends that these lights be replaced with downcasting shielded fixtures. Applicant proposes to add three (3) building mounted 18 watt compact florescent flood lights on the east end of the building. These same lights will be used under the covered walkway. Also proposed is an additional pole light. All new lighting must be downcasting and shielded. Specifications on the new lighting should be submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to installation. Sewer: This project requires an additional allocation of 2525 gpd. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit. Dumpster: The dumpsters are shown on the plan and are screened. Other: Fire Chief Jim Goddette has reevaluated the site and determined that an additional fire hydrant is not necessary. 6) JOLLEY ASSOCIATES - ADDITION - SITE PLAN This project consists of the construction of a 262 square foot addition to a convenience store with gas sales and a 12'x24' dumpster shed. This project was originally approved on 9/23/86 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 977 Shelburne Road lies within the Cl District. It is bounded on the north by the K-Mart Plaza, on the west by undeveloped land, on the south by Burger King and undeveloped land and on the east by Shelburne Road. Access/circulation: Access is provided via two (2) 36 foot wide curb cuts on Shelburne Road. No access changes proposed. Circulation is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 6.5% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 41.5% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 66.1% (maximum allowed is 30%). This is an existing situation which will not be made worse by this application. '3 7 Memorandum - Planning November 23, 1993 agenda items November 19, 1993 Page 6 Setback requirements are met. Parking: This site requires a total of 13 parking spaces and 17 � spaces are available. The available spaces include two (2) spaces at each of the four (4) pump islands and nine (9) spaces along then. southerly boundary. One (1) of these spaces should be indicated* for handicapped use. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement for this project, VJI�t based on building costs, is $450 which is not being met. Plan should be revised to show additional landscaping to meet the,�A\�'�a requirement. Staff recommends this landscaping be planted near the storage sheds. u Traffic: This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 1 which allows this property to generate a maximum of 28.4 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. I.T.E. uses two (2) methods to estimate trip generation for this type of use, gross floor area and number of pumps. Based on gross floor area the use currently generates 68.4 vte's and based on pumps it generates 82.4 vte's. This addition will increase trips, based on gross floor area, by 19.2 vte's to 87.6 vte's. Since no pumps will be added the trip end estimate based on pumps will not change. The applicant submitted a five (5) day traffic count (M-F) at this facility between 4-6 P.M. which had an average trip generation rate of 77.4 vte's. The Planning Commission needs to decide whether it believes this addition will increase trip ends. No changes are proposed which would produce a net benefit in traffic flow. Lighting: Exterior lighting consists of nine (9) 400 watt metal halide lamps on 16 foot poles with cutoff luminaries. Sewer: No additional allocation needed. 7) BARRETT'S TREE SERVICE - ADDITIONS - SITE PLAN This project consists of the expansion of a nonconforming use by the removal of a 2,250 square foot storage building and replacing it with a new 3,730 square foot warehouse building, constructing a 495 square foot second story addition to an existing office building and the merging of the adjacent residential lot which will be purchased by the applicant. The commercially developed lot, 0 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: December 14, 1993 agenda items Date: December 10, 1993 2) JOLLEY ASSOCIATES - ADDITION - SITE PLAN This project was continued from the 11/23/93 meeting to give staff time to prepare a motion of denial (see enclosed motion and staff notes from the last meeting). 3) CONNIE WEEMS/THOMAS TAVARES - BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT - FINAL PLAT This project consists of a boundary line adjustment between a 21,500 square foot lot and an 11,241 square foot lot to create a 14,000 square foot lot and an 18,741 square foot lot. Both lots are developed with single family dwellings. Sketch plan was reviewed on 9/28/93 (minutes enclosed). These properties are located at 76 and 80 Shunpike Road and lie within the R4 District. They are bounded on the north by residences, on the east by undeveloped industrial/commercial lots, on the south by a residence and on the west by Shunpike Road. Access: Access to both lots will not change. Lot size: Both lots will continue to meet the minimum lot size of 9,500 square feet (0.22 acres). Lot frontages for both lots will remain unchanged. Neither lot meets the minimum frontage requirement of 80 feet. Both lots could be developed with two- family dwellings. 4) MARY PROVENCHER - 2 LOT SUBDIVISION - FINAL PLAT This project consists of the subdivision of a lot with approximately 6,135 square feet into a 1,845 square foot lot and a 4,290 square foot lot. The existing lot is presently developed with two (2) single-family dwellings. The purpose of the subdivision is to create a lot for each dwelling for future sale. Neither lot will meet the minimum area and dimension requirements i ' ) ' �� � Ni Department �� n���oO����� ��/��� 575 Dorset **rect ��outb "Burlington, 13crtnon2 05403 FAX: <802>658'4748 (unu)ssa'noso TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE RE: TUESDAY NOVEMBER 2Sp1993 AGENDA ITEMS DATE; FRIDAY OCTOBER 22,1993 1. RAGS AND RICHES LTD DATED 5/18/93 1087 WILLISTON ROAD 2. 3. 4. PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM IN GIVEN PROPER FIRE PROTECTION IF REQUIRED. BARRETTS TREE SERVICE PATCHEN ROAD DATED 10/12/93 PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND THE ONLY PROBLEM I SEE AT THIS TIME IS BECAUSE OF THE SIZE OF THE BUILDINGS AND LOCATION ON THE PROPERTY THERE HAS TO BE AT LEAST 30" BETWEEN BUILDINGS IF WE ARE TO GIVE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION. FREDRICK & LOUISE MCGIBNEY DATED AUGUST,93 PROJECT # 12793 THE LOT SUB —DIVISION BEING REQUESTED FOR WILL NOT EFFECT EMERGENCY PROTECTION IF NEEDED. S.B. COLLINS R7.-7 SHELBURNE ROAD PROJECT #829-1 THE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR THE ADDITION TO THE STORE AND AT THIS TIME I FEEL IT WOULD EFFECT EMERGENCY PROTECTION IF REQUIRED. 5. PIZZA PUT ADDITIONS AIRPORT PKWAY PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND BECAUSE OF THE SIZE OF THE BUILDINGS AND THE ADDED SQUARE FOOTAGE IF APPROVED A HYDRANT WILL BE REQUIRED AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY THIS OFFICE. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 10, 1993 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: Addition, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Jim Goddette were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, December 14, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, 1456 046 Joe Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp PLANNING COMMISSION 23 SEPTEMBER 1986 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 23 September 1986, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present Peter Jacob, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, William Burgess, John Belter, Judith Hurd, John Dooley, Catherine Peacock Also Present Jane Lafleur, Planner; William Szymanski, City Manager; Paul Farrar, Francis Murray, Michael Flaherty, Molly Lambert, City Council; Sidney Poger, The Other Paper; Channel 3 News - crew; Don George, Ann Pugh, Dewey Irish, R.J. Perry, Dick MacKenzie, Bill Rowell, Lorette Richer, Francis Richer, William Floyd, H. Davison, Barbara Skye, Doug Fitzpatrick, Leo O'Brien, James Knapp, Steve Smith, Bob Jolley, Lowell Krassner, David Spitz, Ernest Pomerleau, Bob Blanchard, Chris Dunn, Mery Brown, Lance Llewellyn, Tony Pomerleau, Karen Unsworth 1. Continue Site Plan application of S. construction of 4000 sg. ft. convenience Pumps, 977 Shelburne Rd. B. Collins for store with gasoline Mr. Smith said they have moved the building back 20 ft. They will add the sidewalk from Burger King to K-Mart. Drainage will be piped to the storm drains. Ms. Lafleur noted they will need State approval for this. The 15-foot side yard clearance has been met. Ms. Peacock noted the City Manager's concern about rear lot drainage. Mr. Smith said the new plan shows a ditch to contain this water on the property. There is now 42% landscaping in front which is still below require- ment. Mrs. Hurd noted the island is over the property line. Mrs. Lafleur said it is in the state right-of-way and will require state approval. Mr. Dooley moved that the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of S.B. Collins for Jolley Associates for construction of a 4000 sq. ft. gasoline station/conven- ience store at 977 Shelburne Rd. as depicted on a plan en- titled "S.B. Collins, Inc., St. Albans, Vermont, proposed Retail and Gas Outlet, Shelburne Road, City of South Burlington, Vermont" prepared ]2y Buck & Pierce, St. Albans, Vermont, last revised 9 18 86 with the following stipulations 1. A $4500 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. A revised landscaping plan shall be submitted to the City Planner within 30 days to reflect this value. 2. Parking spaces shall be shown on the plan and striped on PLANNING COMMISSION 23 SEPTEMBER 1986 PAGE 2 the pavement. 3. A sidewalk shall be installed along the Shelburne Rd. frontage to connect the Burger King Sidewalk to the K-Mart walkway. It shall be continuous across the driveway and shall be 8 inches thick at driveways. The walkway to K-Mart shall also be shown on the plans. The proposed curbs shall be concrete 4. Property line adjustments shall be made along the south boundary showing a 15 foot setback between any building and the property line. A revised mylar depicting new property lines shall be recorded with the City Clerk within 30 days. 5. Drainage plans for the entire property shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to permit. The rear of the property shall not be allowed to drain onto the K-Mart property or the Burger King property. 6. It is the applicant's responsibility to have the Water Department confirm the location of the water main prior to permit. 7. New storm drains shall intercept the existing drains at the inlets or manholes installed. It shall not be done with ties. State approvals shall be obtained for connecting storm drains to the street system. 8. The applicant shall contribute $720 toward the Shelburne Rd. intersection improvement fund based on the 28 trip ends generated by this development. 9. Revised plans reflecting all of the above changes shall be submitted to the City Planner for approval within 30 days. 10. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void Mrs. Maher seconded, and the motionpassed-unanimously. 2. PUBLIC HEARING:Final Plat application of Dewey Irish for subdivision of a 1.15 acre lot for a single family house from the 68.43 acre farm at 200 Allen Rd. Mrs. Lafleur noted that the applicant will have to submit water and sewer details for the City Manager's approval. Mr. Szymanski will place the sewer line so it falls in the future 60-foot right-of-way. Mr. Dooley moved that the Planning Commission approve the City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 19, 1993 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: Addition, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Jim Goddette were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, November 23, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. qS' cerely, "--fv J Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp F. 4 `r')� 0 Form Ten EH Arm Mount Form Ten EH: Arm mounted square architectural luminaires gracefully proportioned and carefully crafted from aluminum extrusions. Corners 4 are precisely mitered and all fasteners and welds are concealed. Units are available in one-way, two-way and four-way configurations in two sizes with HID lamps from 70 to 400 wafts. Configurations 13 1 [), 2 4 [3=�h U 13 Distribution Patterns Type I Type FM Type III Type VS' ram` Type VO Type VS is not available in 14". Supplied with sag Tens, see product details Pg.17. Ordering Information Prefix Size Configuration Reflector I Volts Lamp Finish EH 14" 1 2 4 1 3 120 2 240 Refer to NA Lamp l RA Selector DL EH 19" FM 277 VS 480 Lamp Selector 14" housings 19" h usinc_ s 70W HPS 250W H 100W HPS 25N MV 100W MV 250W MH .150W HPS' 40OW HPS 175W MV 40OW MV 175W MH 40OW MH 'Supplied with ballast to operate 55 volt lamp unless specified otherwise. Top pan Mssnoeks wn-. sees ro ao..ee a .aane•.•ro' uai Enru0e0 Aim;nwn arm—� wan Mn0•rgk, 1",1 riR M/ 1 C I 'as'"'s �.:. + :S Pde Doisw pUU wm pra•n.N,a1� �.---- C Easss.r�wa� ro�n40 9 clorald s'� SaKo•H Css�rs — Flu Ymp*gd ptass+aq Example Fe'eziorT�oe 'rr'ma7 2a!,ast Voltage Corf;gu~ , Lam S:z I Finish ! Fref. 0pt ons EH 19 2 3 120 400MH BRA Finish: NA = Natural Anodize BRA = Bronze Anodize BLA = B'ack Anodize Lamp Abbreviations: t,'V = Mercury Vapor HPS = Hich Pressure Sodium MH = tole:al Halide Options: AD = Arrter Drop Diffuser CD = Clear Drop Diffuser F = Fusing M,A = Mast Arm Fitter rC = hotocell (on 430 volt, receptacle only) = Folycarbonale Lens Note: 1. VS Reflecloravailable in-19"-250tAH, 400MH, 250HPS, 400HPS. Dimensional Data EH14 EH19 A 14" 19" B 7" 10" C Arm Length 6" 9" D Arm Height 5" 5" GA�co � IC - �a YylB 1951- L/ ftlll�� 6FA�Ir4 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..Baldwin Ave/SBCP/Shelburne Road AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. Dickinson DATE .......... 1-16-93 TIME .......... 1993 DHV COMMENT ....... w/ Project - Phase I; w/o K-Mart link -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 32 47 17 90 : LTR 15.0 LTR 15.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 2 1 1905 1739 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 20 63 71 15 : 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M {o} Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 25.8 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 25.8 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 15.3 4 SB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 15.3 4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 110.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH Y Y RT Y RT Y N PD PD GREEN 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 10.0 56.0 12.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 0.327 0.127 33.6 D 33.6 D WB LTR 0.610 0.127 38.2 D 38.2 D NB L 0.098 0.109 33.5 D 17.3 C TR 0.943 0.664 17.1 C SB L 0.446 0.127 34.8 D 11.1 B TR 0.810 0.682 9.9 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 15.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.828 LOS = C ( City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 28, 1993 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates 54 Lower Welden Street St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: Addition, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please respond to these comments, if appropriate, with additional information and/or revised plans by no later than Friday, November 12, 1993. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sinc ly, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB / mcp M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files From: Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, November 23, 1993 agenda items Date: October 29, 1993 PIZZA PUTT - ADDITION - SITE PLAN --- bicycle parking facilities must be provided and shown on the plan as required under Section 19.253b of the zoning regulations. --- provide number of existing and proposed seats in the facility. --- all parallel parking spaces must be at least 22 feet in length. --- minimum landscaping requirement is $6,000, plan does not show any additional landscaping and some landscaping will be lost as a result of the front addition. Plan should be revised to show $6,000 of additional landscaping plus the value of the landscaping being lost. --- plan indicates that 75 spaces are being provided but staff counts only 74 spaces. --- existing and proposed exterior lighting must be shown on the plan. Lighting details must be submitted. All existing lighting must be appropriately shielded to not cast light beyond the property line. --- dumpsters must be shown and adequately screened. --- applicant should consider a rear entrance to the building to serve the rear parking spaces. JOLLEY ASSOCIATES - ADDITION - SITE PLAN --- provide existing and proposed exterior lighting details. --- the minimum landscaping requirement is $450. Plan should be revised to show additional landscaping to meet the requirement. --- provide gross square foot of retail building with the addition and provide square footage of retail floor area with the addition. --- will this addition increase the peak number of employees on the site? --- provide front yard coverage percentage. --- plan should show existing sidewalk along Shelburne Road. --- the Planning Commission will need to determine whether or not there will be an increase in traffic generation. If they do determine that there will be an increase they can not approve the expansion because the site currently exceeds the limits. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: Preliminary Comments November 23, 1993 Agenda items Date: October 29, 1993 MCGIBNEY 2 LOT SUBDIVISION - HINESBURG ROAD Plan prepared by Vermont Survey & Engineering, Inc. dated August, 1993 is acceptable. PIZZA PUTT ADDITION - AIRPORT PARKWAY 1. Location of water mains on Airport Parkway and Berard Drive should be shown on the plans. 2. Parking area shall be graded so that it drains to the north and toward Berard Drive. RAGS AND RICHES LTD 1. There exists two catch basins on the frontage of this property which should be shown on the plans. 2. Sidewalk on Williston Road should be shown. 3. The sidewalk at the entrance to be closed shall be replaced. It has a dip in it and water will pond there when the barrier curb is installed. BARRETT'S TREE SERVICE - PATCHEN ROAD 1. Final plan shall include a north arrow and a completed title block. 2. Site shall drain toward the rear. JOLLEY ASSOCIATES ADDITION - SHELBURNE ROAD Plan prepared by Schreib Engineering, Inc. dated 3/12/93 is acceptable. �3. os X 6FAl'- �3.s x . 93� = 68, y VTe 73, b3A �j 5? e� 1-1 �v. � x Pis 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT y y -4 J� •4 •l- •4 3• S •4 •4 1,4 •4 �4 •4 J1 W •1•L J. � J� •4 •Y• �4 i � y ;� J� J� 1� Y •4. ,Y .L y •L J� Y .Y •L J� •4 Y •Y y 1Y ,Y J� -4 :4 J; J: y y .4 J• .4 J. 4 y •L 1� J: ;4 .M •4 J� y y INTERSECTION..Swift Street/Shelburne Road AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... R. Dickinson DATE .......... 1-16-93 TIME .......... 1993 DHV COMMENT ....... w/ Project - Phase I -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 0 269 0 157 : 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 TH 0 0 2216 1544 : 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 0 215 260 0 : 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PING BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 WB -2.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.5 4 SB 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.95 50 N 8.5 4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 110.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT TH TH 1 RT RT 1 PD PD WB LT Y SB LT X TH TH Y Y RT Y RT PD PD GREEN 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 14.0 59.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS WB L 0.814 0.218 40.0 E 31.4 D R 0.436 0.364 20.5 C NB TR 0.998 0.555 27.9 D 27.9 D SB L 0.681 0.145 39.0 D 8.3 B T 0.669 0.727 5.4 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 21.3 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.904 LOS = C 54 Lower Welden Street PC). Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 802 527-0116 • 893-7744 TRAFFIC COUNT Monday, September 6, 1993 IN OUT 4 : 0 0 -4 : 15 10 6 l(v 4 : 15-4: 30 4 4:30-4:45 13 9:' 4:45-5:00 6 11: 5:00-5:15 6 4 = /o 5 : 15-5 : 30 8 6 = iq 5:30-5:45 4 9=13 5:45-6:00 8 8 =/(n TOTAL 59 59 Retailer of Petroleum Products M 54 Lower Welden Street P.G. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 802 527-0116 • 893-7744 TRAFFIC COUNT Tuesday, September 7, 1993 IN OUT 4: 0 0 - 4 : 15 10 7 4 : 15-4: 30 11 11 � P' 4: 30-4: 45 6 5 = si 4: 45-5: 00 10 11 = a/ 5 : 00-5 : 15 8 8 = ?b 5 : 15-5 : 30 7 6 = l3 5:30-5:45 7 10�'� 5:45-6:00 12 13 S TOTAL 71 71 Retailer of Petroleum Products �i 54 ' ower Welden Street P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 802 527-0116 • 893-7744 TRAFFIC COUNT Wednesday, September 8, 1993 IN OUT 4: 00-4: 15 10 4= 1A_ 4:15-4:30 6 9=g �( 4:30-4:45 8 10 4:45-5:00 11 9 .!b 5 : 00-5 : 15 7 8-�5 5:15-5:30 6 4-�� 5:30-5:45 3 6 = q S 4 5: 45-6: 00 8 9 TOTAL 59 59 Retailer of Petroleum Products 54 I..ower Welden Street P.O Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 802 527-0116 • 893-7744 TRAFFIC COUNT Thursday, September 9, 1993 IN OUT 4: 00-4: 15 7 4= '( 4: 15-4:30 7 9 =/(o 4:30-4:45 6 7=j3 4:45-5:00 7 5 = i� 5: 00-5: 15 14 13 5: 15-5: 30 9 7 5 : 3 0 - 5 : 4 5 11 15 =P� 5:45-6:00 3 4 TOTAL 64 64 Retailer of Petroleum Products no I INAMMI 54 1 ower Welden Street P.O. Box 671 St. Albans, Vermont 05478 802 527-0116 • 893-7744 TRAFFIC COUNT Friday, September 9, 1993 IN OUT 4:00-4:15 12 8 +b 4:15-4:30 17 19 3� 4:30-4:45 6 5 4:45-5:00 14 14� 5:00-5:15 13 14 5 : 15-5 : 30 8 10 = e 5:30-5:45 10 9 = i� 5:45-6:00 7 8 TOTAL 87 87 Retailer of Petroleum Products CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) g&v 2) APPLICANT ( name, addreeswsA,' phone # ) 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) Amite goz - Sa -7 -01/6 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: �7'7 &10Sam - 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S) &i QWV_e, swt lG24-M 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) /�0,011 _lb •O ro 9;�a'C) 5Z)AJ6 l 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 9) LOT COVERAGE: building %; landscaped areas.Jl % building, parking, outside storage % �%ZD�Ssb 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ �SD00 , Landscaping $ Other Site Improvements (please list with -cost) $ -- 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: AW,o 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. V-6 p.m. 4-5 p.m. ; 5-6 p.m. ; 6-7 p.m. 13 ) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: ;2 q A) E"9J /,� &41 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF HEARING M 365- 69415 4 4t.4,,L. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT N EXPANS101 0 262.5 SQ FT� T 0 I Q i T' N-J 0 i 'TJ I � > o U. S. ROUTE SEVEN o SHELBURNE ROAD OMN Nor-" Mr. Milot should explain his plans for preserving prime - agricultural. soils and open space so the Commission can find affirmatively on these criteria. School Site: The Planning Commission should designate a 14-15 acre school site for a future elementary school as allowed under Title 24, Section 4417(5). And as indicated in the 1980 and 1985 Comprehensive Plans. Landscaping A landscaping plan is needed for preliminary plat. It must show street trees, preferably of 4- 4 1/2 inch caliper, 60 feet on center. These are especially important in the open field areas. A landscaping plan with at least two trees per lot is also required. Utilities: A utility plan is also required at preliminary plat. Other: Under Section 412.2 of the subdivision regulations, no topsoil can be taken from the property other than to meet the construction needs of the subdivision. See Bill Szymanski's and Jim Goddette's comments. 7) SB Collins, 977 Shelburne Road SB Collins proposes to construct a 4000 square foot convenience store with four pump islands. The small Petco gas station building will be removed. The property is zoned C-1 and this is a permitted use; it was given a multiple use permit by the ZBA. Access: The applicant proposes to access the site from two 36 foot wide curb cuts on Shelburne Road. There are presently three cuts. The ordinance states that there shall be one driveway per lot unless one is entrance only and one is exit. Circulation: Circulation is shown completely around the building. The front half of the lot is paved. Parking: Although not shown on the plan, the applicant proposes 10 parking spaces behind the building. These spaces should be striped on the pavement and delineated on the plan. These spaces are most likely to be used by employees rather than customers since customers will fill up with gas and run into the store or drive right up to the front of the store as they do at the Kennedy Drive Mobil station. Landscaping: The landscaping plan shows a new landscaped island of 18-20 feet in depth from the property line. The plans show the island and the sides of the entrance drive planted with sargent juniper, rugosa roses and flowering crab. It would be preferable to have large (4-4 1/2 inch caliper) trees in the front at a minimum. A $4500 landscaping plan is required. this plan shows approximately $600 in new plantings. The difference should be 4 made ul) in large trees along the front and along the 1)r01)e1, LY line. Lot Covera e_ The total lot coverage is 41%. The building coverage is 5%. The front ,yard coverage exceeds our standard of 30% pavement within the 50 foot setback. Approximately 28 % is landscaped or 72% paved within this area. Although the landscaped island is an improvement, the Commission should discuss whether the front yard should be brought into conformance or whether this is enough of an improvement. There should be a five foot landscaped/grassed area along the northern and southern property lines. The property should not be paved right up to the property line. Traffic: This property is in Overlay Zone One and 29 trip ends are permitted during the peak hour of Shelburne Road. The applicant projects 14 trip ends maximum during these hours. There is no comparable ITE data. Other: Evidently, the property line shown on this plan is different than that shown on the plan for the Burger King Restaurant. The SB Collins plan shows it further south, closer to Burger King than Burger King represented. The Pomerleau's are willing to accept the property line as it is shown in exchange for a right-of-way across the rear to Petc o, as long as it does not jeopardize their situation. Since the Burger King addition is built within the 15 foot setback from the new line the boundary will have to jut out around the addition to maintain the proper setback. See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. 5 M F. M 0 R A N D U M `l �t�_ To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner Re: September 23, 1986 agenda items Date: September 19, 1986 2)( S.B. Collins, 977 Shelburne Road I have received revised plans that show the building moved back 20 feet, a five foot buffer around the perimeter of the property, and the front yard coverage increased to 42% of the 50 foot setback area. The property boundary must be revised to show a 15 foot setback from each building. See Bill's comments regarding the new drainage plan. 3) IRISH, 200 ALLEN ROAD This final plat proposes to subdivide a 1.15 acre parcel from the 68.43 acre farm. The new lot is located just south of the water tower. The lot will be served by a RO foot right-of-way and a private extension to Harbor Ridge Road. Bonds must be posted for the street, water and sewer extension prior to permit. The recorded mylar must show the new lot on the overall plan. 4) SEMICON, TWO -LOT SUBDIVISION, 1000 HINESBURG ROAD This preliminary plat is for the subdivision of a 31.2 acre parcel with the existing building and an 80 acre parcel for future development. The road is shown as 30 feet in width and will be amended for final plat approval to include a 10 foot easement on both sides for snow storage. 5) O'BRIEN, FOXCROFT, HINESBURG ROAD Daniel O'Brien proposes to revise parcel one in Foxcroft from 24 multi -family and 4 single-family units to 28 multi -family units. The parcel is located on the northside (right side) of Hayes Avenue. The 28 multi -family units will be served by a private street of 24 feet in width. Adequate parking is shown. Sixty one spaces are required for the 28 units; 62 are shown including spaces within garages, in driveways and extra guest spaces. 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) JOLLEY ASO.TATRS,r 54 LOWER WELDEN ST., ST ALBANS, VT 05478 (80 )527-0116 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) S.B. COLLINS INC., 54 LOWER WELDEN ST., ST. ALBANS, VT 05478 (802)527-0116 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #)•STEPHEN SMITH, 54 LOWER WELDEN ST., ST. ALBANS, VT 05478 (802)527-0116 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 977 SHELBURNE ROAD 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S) GAS ISLAND AND CONVENIENCE STORE 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) 4000 SQ.FT. - 20 FT. - 1 FLOOR 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 5.3 %; landscaped areas 3.2 % building, parking, outside storage41.2% 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ 150,000.Oq Landscaping $ 3,500.00 Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: N/A 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 13 12-1p.m. 13 ; 1-2 p.m. 13 ; 2-3 p.m. 12 3-4 p.m. 14 4-5 p.m. 13 ; 5-6 p.m. 10 ; 6-7 p.m._ o 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 11:00 AM TO 2:00 PM - 4:00 PM TO 8:00 PM 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: THURSDAY-EAP:FVAY7SATURDAY 9-2-86 W— DATE OF SUBMISSION z SIGNATFJRE OF APPLICANT 9-16-86 DATE OF HEARING October 1, 1986 Stephen Smith S.B. Collins 54 Lower Welden Street St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Res S.B. Collins, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Steve: Enclosed are the minutes of your site plan approval. You must record the mylar with the revised property boundary within 30 days of September 23, 1986. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encl cc: Howard Seaver HOWARD J. SEAVER HERBERT J. DOWNING SEAVER ASSOCIATES, INC. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 152 BANK STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 October 1, 1986 Richard Ward, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Jolley Associates, 977 Shelburne Road (former PETCO Gas Station Property) Dear Dick: TELEPHONE (802) 658-6087 The Agreement that Jolley Associates plans to enter into with the owners of the Burger King property will have the following features: 1. The boundary line between the two properties will be such as to give the Jolley Associates parcel 172 feet of frontage on Rte. 7. 2. There will be a slight "jog" in the boundary around the recently constructed Burger King storage shed, so that the storage shed will be at least 15 feet from the boundary. 3. Jolley Associates, however, will have an easement over the "jog" area, allowing paving and landscaping by Jolley and full use by Jolley and its customers. 4. If a shopping center is built in the future on the land to the west and south of Burger King, that shopping center will have an easement over the far westerly portion of the Jolley parcel, to allow traffic to flow between that shopping center and the existing shopping center (K Mart, etc.) to the north; and the Jolley parcel will likewise have an easement allowing its customers direct access to the common areas of the shopping centers. We hope to have this Agreement finalized and signed within a couple of weeks, along with a map showing the above items. Very t u yours, Howard J. Seaver HJS/jrm PLANNING COMMISSION 16 SEPTEMBER 1986 PAGE 5 sewer line. There will be a driveway from Harbor Ridge to the house. Mrs. Lafleur said the City Manager wants a 60 foot right of way instead of 50 feet and also wants it to be a city street so the city can continue to plow straight through. Mrs. Hurd said she couldn't see putting in a 400 foot room for one house. Mr. Jacob agreed. He added that there will have to be a written agreement between Mr. Irish and his brother for the use of the right of way. Ms. Peacock said she was concerned about a private road. 6. Site plan application of S.B. Collins for construction of a 4000 sc. ft. convenience store with gasoline pumps at 977 Shelburne Rd. Petco property southeast of K-Mart Steve Smith and Bob Jolley explained the plan. The building will be 25' by 39' with a similar look to the Kennedy Dr. Mobil station. There will be 4 pumps. Traffic projections are based only on gas use, not the mini -mart. It will be 50 feet from the edge of the canopy to the road. Mrs. Lafleur noted they do not meet front yard coverage. They are going from 3 to 2 curb cuts and are greatly improving the landscaping and adding an island. Mr. Jacob felt moving the building back 20 feet would give more frontage with greenspace and a more attractive front to draw customers. Mrs. Lafleur recommended large trees. Mrs. Lafleur noted a boundary dispute that has been settled. Mrs. Maher said if the applicant can conform on front coverage and the landscaping plan, she would go along with it. The owner of adjacent property said they have a swale that they want to protect their interest in. They want to be sure that with all the fill that's been put in back of the land, there won't be runoff onto their property. Mrs. Hurd moved to continue the matter until the next available meeting. Mr. Belter seconded, 'and the motion passed unanimously. As there was no fruther business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 11:00 pm. Clerk 40*0 P).,o �, � rd P4�t Ablo( -.W� ooe- 9 �flL la rnn - 5a.35� a.Y 5 C R c-- I? 7J b)c SCOT\ s� � rY'XDve.& v City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658-7955 September 22, 1986 Stephen Smith S.B. Collins 54 Lower Welden Street St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: S.B. Collins, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the minutes of the September 16, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. Sincerely, JO^��. 4RUX.A. Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encl MOTION OF APPROVAL 9/22/86-JBL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of S.B. Collins for Jolley Associates for construction of a 4000 square foot gasoline station/convenience store at 977 Shelburne Road as depicted on a plan entitled "S.B. Collins, Inc., St. Albans, Vermont, proposed Retail and Gas Outlet, Shelburne Road, City of South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Buck and Pierce, St. Albans, Vermont, last revised 9/18/86 with the following stipulations: 1) A $4500 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. A revised landscaping plan shall be submitted to the City Planner within 30 days to reflect this value. 2) Parking spaces shall be shown on the plan and striped on the pavement. 3) A sidewalk shall be installed along the Shelburne Road frontage to connect the Burger King sidewalk to the K-Mart walkway. It shall be continuous across the driveways and shall be 8 inches thick at driveways. The walkway to K-Mart shall also be shown on the plans. The proposed curbs shall be concrete. 4) Property line adjustments shall be made along the south boundary showing a 15 foot setback between any building and the property line. A revised mylar_ depicting new property lines shall be recorded with the City Clerk within 30 days. 5) Drainage plans for the entire property shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to permit. The rear of the property shall not be allowed to drain onto the K-Mart property or the Burger King property. 6) It is the applicants responsibility to have the Water Department confirm the location of the water main prior to permit. 7) New storm drains shall intercept the existing drains at the inlets or manholes installed. It shall not be done with ties. State approvals shall be obtained for connecting storm drains to the street system. 8) The applicant shall contribute $720 toward the Shelburne Road intersection improvement fund based on the 28 trip ends generated by this development. 9) Revised plans reflecting all of the above change shall be submitted to the City Planner for approval within 30 days. 10) The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. ,. 1 �k ��1 s c c� CA&L 6- _Co t► � y.vs' a -- - ly LahOsc.c�.�� to ruses '�/.05 Goje*v- je x 7 3 qo it/,I,fxzt 5.9 S 12 CAAJO 10.3o gxS 3bxi7a:�bo�=7o� asa -e4 3&rah 4ax � a �` g'` $ 7a9.5 x a.S� i8o� M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: September 23, 1986 agenda items Date: September 19, 1986 (2) S.B. COLLINS, SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Some of the concerns expressed in last memo have not been addressed mainly the K-Mart sidewalk, the rear drainage, the waterline. 2. State approval will have to be obtained for connecting the storm drains to the street system. 5) CARDINAL WOODS PHASE II, FOXCROFT 1. The two drainage pipes north of Hayes Avenue Sta. B+50 should be joined by a drop inlet. This will help in the maintenance of the area. The same recommendation for the end of the pipe draining the area north of Hayes Avenue Sta. 5+50. 2. Water Department shall review the water main layout. However, unit curb stops must be within the water main easement. Plan shows some close to buildings. 3. The grading along the northerly and westerly property lines should be such that runoff from the development does not drain on to these properties. This will occur with the grading as shown. Floor elevations of units may have to be lowered to accommodate this grading work. 4. Internal street lighting should be provided. 6) M & M PARTNERSHIP, SWIFT STREET 1. Extensive lot coverage by buildings and pavement will increase drainage runoff. This increased runoff will drain upon the adjacent property especially the property to the west and to the north. I would recommend a piped system with a series of drop inlets to intercept surface and road runoff and outlet it to the east. 1 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658-7955 September 19, 1986 Stephen Smith S.B. Collins 54 Lower Welden Street St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: S.B. Collins, 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the agenda and my memo to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday to represent your plan. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encls MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: September 16, 1986 agenda items Date: September 12, 1986 4) LDB, INC., (MERV BROWN) 1175 HINESBURG ROAD Comments will be available Tuesday. 5) IRISH SUBDIVISION, ALLEN ROAD (HARBOR RIDGE EXTENSION) 1. Street rights of way should be 60' in width. 2. Extended street shall be a City street constructed to City standards. A turnaround shall be constructed beyond the southerly lot. 3. The triangular piece of land along the frontage of C.W.D. land should be deeded to the District. 6) A & G INVESTMENTS (GERRY MILOT AND ALAN BARTLETT) 900 DORSET STREET No comments. 7') S.B. COLLINS, INC., SHELBURNE ROAD 1. There should be a sidewalk along Shelburne Road tieing into Burger King and the walkway to K-Mart. It shall be continuous across driveways. Sidewalk thickness at drives shall be 8 inches. 2. The walkway to K-Mart should be shown on the plan. 3. Proposed curbs shall be concrete. 4. The filling that has taken place has caused a drainage problem on to the K-Mart property. This must be taken care of before regrading the area. New plans should be submitted showing method to control drainage. 5. The Water Department shall confirm the location of the water main shown on the plan. 6. New storm drain pipes shall intercept existing at inlets or manholes installed. Not with ties. 1 � l outlt TAurtiugtvu fire '43epartuteut 575 11urset street 3autb Nurlington, 13ermnnt L154111 OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658-7960 MEMORANDUM ---------------- TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE RE: SEPTEMBER 16,1986 AGENDA ITEMS DATE: SEPTEMBER 8,1986 Bernice S. Irish Allen Road Lot Sub -Division More information is required on the following; A. Water system B. Hydrant location. #2. S.B Collins Inc. Retail/Gas Station At this time I do not see a problem with the project. I do have a concern that Shelburne Road is a five (5) lane Highway and all hydrants are on the other side of the road. #3. Southsett At Swift Milot Project. More infromation is needed on the water system and hydrant location. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658-7955 September 12, 1986 Stephen Smith Jolley Associates S.B. Collins, Inc. 54 Lower Welden Street St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Re: 977 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Smith: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are my memo and the agenda for the Tuesday, September 16, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. Also enclosed are Bill Szymanski's comments. I expect that the Commission will hear this item after 9:00 P.M. Please be sure someone is present to represent your request. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encls August 12, 1986 Mr. Stephen Smith Jolley Associates 54 Lower Welden Street St. Albans, Vermont 05478 Dear Mr. Smith: Please forward any documents relating to the actual frontage of your property at 977 Shelburne Road. I understand that the property has been surveyed, and it indicates 172 feet frontage. The issue of adverse possession as stated in a letter by Attorney Howard Seaver dated July 24, 1986 must also be resolved. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp SEAVER ASSOCIATES, INC. ATTORNEYS AT LAW HOWARD I. SEAVER HERBERT J. DOWNING Jolley Associates 54 Lower Welden Street P. O. Box 671 St. Albans, VT 05478 152 BANK STREET BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05401 July 24, 1986 Re: Former Petco property, west side of Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, VT (Spillane to Jolley Associates, 6/16/86, Volume 216, Page 320) You have asked me for an opinion as to your rights to a portion of the above property. The facts you have described to me are as follows: 1. The entire property has 172 feet of road frontage. 2. Your surveyor has found that you have record title to only the southerly 159 feet of frontage. 3. The entire property has been a gas station for more than 15 years, including the 13 feet in question. 4. The 13 feet has been used as an integral part of the gas station. Located on it are the gas station building, the sign, and pavement. 5. This use of the 13 feet has been continuous, open, notorious and under claim of right for more than 15 years. TELEPHONE (802) 658-6087 Based on the above facts, it is my opinion that you have title to the 13 feet by adverse possession. Very tau y rs, C Howard '� -J. S6aver HJS/jrm