HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0981 Shelburne Road (5)C i ty of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOl1TH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
PLANNER
658-7955
October 5, 1988
Mr. David White
Pomerleau Real Estate
P.O. Box 6 .
Burlington, Vermont, 05402
Re: 40 Acre Shelburne Road parcel
Dear David:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658.7958
Enclosed are the Sgptember 6, 1988 Planning Commission meeting
minutes. Please call if ,you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Joe Weith,
City Planner
JW/mcp
1 Encl
PLANNING COMMISSION
6 SEPTEMBER 1988
PAGE 6
c) the entrance drive to the south having a depressed
concrete curb
3. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or
this approval is null and void.
Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
5. Discussion with Pomerleau Real Estate concerning various
city policies in particular traffic regulations and future
plans for Shelburne Rd. and a Southern Connector, and how
these relate to potential development of the 40-acre parcel
on Shelburne Rd.
Ernie Pomerleau explained they have owned the property in
question for 20 years. He located the property on a map of
the area. He noted they proposed a concept a few years ago
and were asked to table it and to come in with a master plan
for the area. He stressed they are not looking at an
enclosed mall but would be proposing multi -use, primarily
retail. They are seeking the Commission's input on traffic
and understand a Southern Connector Extension would be 10
years away at best. The JHK study said that intersection
improvements would make their project OK. He asked under
what guidelines the Commission would review a project on
their land. The Commission asked about the possibility of
access from the north. Mr. Pomerleau said there will be no
access from Pine St. which will be dead -ended and that they
don't own the land to the north. Mrs. Maher asked, in jest
she noted, whether there was anything that could go in there
that would make the intersection no worse than it is now.
She said she would prefer something not at the upper reaches
of density and would prefer a combination of retail, office
use and residential apartments, even some affordable housing.
She felt there could be a mini -community there. She specif-
ically did not want to see a large department store or a
super market.
Mr. Pomerleau asked how far a traffic study should go. Mr.
Burgess said they usually get figures for 1, 3, and 15 years.
Mr. Weith said he would like a figure for full build -out of
the parcel,
It was noted that the erosion issue would be important.
Mr. Pomerleau asked if level "C" is a requirement or whether
they could just improve the intersection. The Commission
said it could be a combination of what the developer doesn't
make worse and what it can improve.
PLANNING COMMISSION
6 SEPTEMBER 1988
PAGE 7
Mr. Craig said he personally felt Rt. 7 to Shelburne Village
will improve in 5 or so years and within another 3 or 4 years
the City of Burlington will get the Southern Connector going.
In 10 years roads on either end will outstrip the capacity of
this area. He felt it won't get any better unless this
section of Shelburne Rd. is improved.
As there was no further business to come before the
Commission, the meeting adjourned at 11:20 pm.
Clerk
r
r
Memorandum _ Planning ah
r"4
September 6,_ 1988 agenda stems
September �, 1988 ,...:.,
Page 3
the p
parking.s aces and loading zones for the building. No
circulation i$
-available along the back of the. building due to
the
narrowness of the lot.
Parking; The plan shows 21 spaces plus 6 future spaces to
accommodate -the future addition. Without
the future addition,
the building requires 16 spaces (4 spaces
p per unit) by ordinance.
With, the "addition`, the building would require 20 spaces.
Therefore, even
with the addition, the proposed 21 parking spaces
should be.sufficient. The 6 future 'us
spaces could-. further" be ed
if determined to -,be, necessary.
"
Landscaping:, The.. proposed building-(5 units) requires $9,300 .
worth of landscaping. The
-landscaping plan shows Norway Maple,
:.Cap Yew, Barberry, "Dwarf Juniper, and nativ"e White
Ceda"r: The
proposed., landscaping is valued at $3,500. The plan 'hould"'be
revised"to show an additional $5,800 Worth.of landscaping".
-
.
The 'plan shows a Dwarf Juniper in the area. proposed"aa tfuture
parking spaces. The
Juniper should - be -,moved outside o.f`"this
area:
_SetbackslCoverag"e'' All setback`_req.uirements "are met. Font yaFd " •.
'
.
coverage. -requirements are, met. • ;Building cc?verage i'or- the .'5 un'i.t
building is 27%, (maximIjm of - 3 %, -Total;
.allowed) . ' "lot; Coverage,'.-
incl.ud"ing t.hs future...p;ark'ifig ".spaces", "is
- 64.X (maxim o'f
al -lowed) . 90•X
!
Other i ' ,See`, Bi l l Szymanaki',a and Chief "bodd6t:te's 'c.omm�ents .I
5} ;: DISCUSSION: WITH.-POMERLEAU REAL -.ESTATE" -
An informal' discussion i=s , being held with Po.merleau : Real testate
to, di'scu'ss- various
`
.
City policies and
to 'the plans a.nd hv.w thesR relate .
potential
,devel;opment of .their 40+ acre
She.lbiirne Road:,, No plans are 'being parcel ..on
g, "prssen.te'd
:" The primary'
purpose of" the discussion is to' -get feed back from the Planning
'on
#
Commission what they. would like to see in that :srea_ and*:a,ny
major, concerns they see- at: this -point. - Other issues "which will
most. Iikel.y surface
are the City's traffic regulations and future;
plans for Shelburne Road and a Southern Connector.
PLANNER
658-7955
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
September 2, 1988
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Mr. David White
Pomerleau Real Estate
P.O. Box 6
Burlington, Vermont 05402
Re: 9/6/88 Planning Commission meeting
Dear Me
Enclosed.are the.agenda item and my comments to the Planning
Commission.
Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, September 6, 1988
at 7:30 P..M. to represent your request.
Sincerely,
tj
Joe Weith,
City Planner
JW/mcp
POMERLEAU
December 16, 1987
Jane Lafleur
South Burlington Planning Commission
575 Dorset Street
So. Burlington, VT 05403
Dear Jane:
Enclosed is a copy of a letter from Fitzpatrick/Llewellyn indicating
that our original traffic study assumptions for our Shelburne Road
properties are still valid and compatible with the analysis that JHK
Associates recently completed for the City. Since the City now has
more background data with which to address our proposal submitted some-
time ago to the Planning Commission, we will proceed to finalize our
plans for re -analysis by the Commission.
It has always been a fine balance between traffic, sewage and economic
timing but it is now clear that it would be prudent on our part to
continue now on our proposal on Rte. 7 to come up with an acceptable
approach to this development. Even now it seems like we will have to
get onto an allocation list for sewage, but obviously need to proceed
with our process before other options are closed to us due to infra-
structure constraints.
Thank you for your continued assistance. We will keep you advised.
My best wishes to you and your family for a wonderful holiday season.
Kindest personal regards,
r
Ernest A. Pomerleau
EAP/nlb
cc• Peter Jacobs
Pomerleau Real Estate Co. P. O. Box 6, 69 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05402 802/ 863-2841
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000
8 December 1987
Mr. Ernest Pomerleau
Pomerleau Real Estate
69 College Street
P.O. Box 6
Burlington, Vermont 05402
RE: Shelburne Road Retail Shopping Center
South Burlington
FILE: 85082
Dear Mr. Pomerleau:
As per our meeting of September 10, 1985 with local planning
officials, we have awaited completion of the Shelburne Road corridor
study so as to allow a better understanding of future traffic
conditions on Shelburne Road.
That corridor study, prepared as part of "Traffic Systems Management
Study, JHK Associates, July 1987, is now comp -Tee ana-F)as�een
pu�Ticly distributed.
As requested, we have reviewed the findings of that report. Its
traffic projections and recommendations largely substantiate those of
the traffic impact evaluation prepared for this Project, dated
October 1985. Specifically, traffic generated by this Project, a
160,000 square feet shopping center, was included in the projected
1990 design year volumes. Analyses of those volumes at all major
intersections in the vicinity of this Project resulted in Levels of
Service C or better.
Should you have any questions concerning the above, please feel free
to contact us.
Sincerely,
FITZPATRICK-LLE ELLYN INCORPORATED
Rogerd Dickinson, P.E.
.T
RJD:amov
Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting • Surveying
r
0
PLANNING COMMISSION
78 acres
APRII. 10, 1y84
of F.
ft _
Mr. Ward said the State had told the city that it had no more capacity
at the Bartlett Bay Treatment Plant. The present Burger King will close its
access to Shelburne Road when this land is developed, and will have access
from an interior road instead. That has been agreed.to already. Mr. Ward
said the applicant had shown a corridor for the Southern Connector which
parallels the railroad tracks. At the entrance point to the land, the road
will line up with Laurel Hill Drive and will be signallized. The complex
would require 37,000 gpd of sewer space. With the Bartlett Bay plant at
capacity, a waiting list will have to be started, as has been done for the
Airport Parkway plant. Position on the list is determined by the date of
preliminary approval.
Mr. Ernie Pomerleau said that the city had turned down the plans for the
Southern Connector, but he had left a 150' wide corridor near the tracks to
allow for the eventual construction of a Connector. He noted that the plan
showed not only the Pomerleau land, but also adjoining Fayette land. The
development has been discussed by both landowners. Mr. Pomerleau felt it would
be helpful for the city to see what might be done on both pieces at once. Mr.
Mona felt a heavy line should be drawn around both pieces of land so that
they would be distinctly separated, and that they should be presented as one piece
or as two separate applications. Mr. Pomerleau said his portion of the total
land was 48 acres to the north and the Fayette land consisted of 33 acres to
the south.He said they could present the application in any form the Commission
wished. He was present as an owner of one property and joint developer of his
land plus that of the adjoining landowner.
Mrs. Maher was not sure the city could handle the traffic that the
development would bring without the Southern Connector in place.
Mr. Lindberg, representing the developer, said the interior access road
would have a 60' right of way. It was hoped that connections could be made
to the Burger King, Big Boy and K-Mart lots. They hoped to have the interior
road intersect with the Connector with an on -grade intersection. The
restaurant, shown on Fayette land, would have access from a secondary road
intersecting with Shelburne Road. This would eventually lead to 2 signallized
intersections giving access to the total 78 acre parcel. Mr. Spitz, representing
the applicant, said they would like to line this road up with McIntosh, if
possible.
Mr. Pomerleau said he would like some direction from the Commission on
the plan. Pars. Maher wondered if it was all academic because of the lack of
sewer capacity and the absence of the Connector. She was not sure Shelburne
Road could handle the traffic from this much commercial space. Mr. Mona
pointed to Corporate Circle, where the overall concept was approved, but the
Commission reserved the right to review each lot as it came in. He felt it
was likely there would be too much traffic for Shelburne Road to handle the
entire development without the Connector. ,ir. Burgess felt that it would hinge
on specific traffic studies for specific uses and he was not sure that approving
or disapproving the concept would have anything to do with the hard facts shown
in a traffic study.
?1r. Spitz noted that 5-6 years ago calculations on the Airport Parkway
plant had shown that it was at capacity and that a waiting; list was started.
After some projects had been built, they were monitored, and it was found that
3.
PLANNING CUNIEISSIuly
APRIL 10, 1984
they had used les:> capacity than the estimates, so people on the waiting list
were allowed to build. That is why Mr. Pomerleau would like to get on the
list here.
Fletcher Crowe said he lived on Laurel Hill Drive and he wondered if
there were a way to get the Connector and the sewer upgrade without costing
the taxpayers money. He felt property owners could not stand any more tax
increases. Mr. Krassner noted that it seemed to cost the community to add
to the Grand List. He felt it would defeat the purpose of the Connector if
it were to have many connections such as one to this area.
Mr. Pomerleau noted that the scale of the project was not immense. 75,000
sq. ft. is about 1/3 the size of Sears. This will not be a major enclosed mall.
A 30,000 sq. ft. office building is not unusual in South Burlington, and that
is not proposed at this time. The hotel/motel is planned to be on a suburban
scale. Fie said that he felt the Southern Connector size could be scaled down
for lower costs and said they would be willing to participate in some way. They
are prepared to do their part. Mr. Fitzpatrick, representing the applicant,
said they had talked to the State and had not been told that this would be
impossible.
Mr. Belter said he was ready to look at a plan, and Mr.Burgess said he
would not oppose this in principle, but he felt it might be hard to get a
favorable traffic study.
Mr. Pomerleau said he was considering the retail first and the motel
second. The office space was down the list. It was noted that what was
built first would affect the traffic, which would in turn affect what more he
could build.
Sketch plan review of application of LTH Associates, Inc., for construction
of a 100 unit residential development on approximately 15 acres, located off
Harbor View Road
Mr. Ward said the area was zoned C2 and that there had been some
discussion of mixed residential and commercial uses, but no provision for
that existed now in the regulations. Those amendments have been put on the
back burner since the Planner left. The proposal is for 100 units on the
15 acres. The land in the area contains the Harbor View Road commercial
area plus a residential area farther up the hill. The density in the first
residential area is 4 units per acre. This proposal is at 7 units per acre.
Mr. Mona noted that there were two issues - whether to allow residential
in this area, and whether this is the proper density. Mr. Ward said that if
the Commission proceeded with the proposed amendments, this use would be allowed.
Mr. Spitz said he represented the applicant. He said that when the
ordinance was approved the idea had been to allow mixed uses in Cl and C2.
The dimensional tables for those zones show a listing for multi -family units
at 7 per acre. The list of uses for Cl shows multi -family as a conditional
use in a PCD, but that line was left out of C2 when the ordinance was written
up. It was just an oversight. He felt the developer could lock for a zoning
change or a variance. Fair. Mona said the Commission could review the application
as if the zoning were eventually to be in place, or the developer could seek a
variance. He personally did not favor the variance, since there is no i.ardship
here. The Commission agreed to review the application.
Mr. Spitz showed slides of the area. It is isolated. Access would be
from Harbor View Road. Mr. Erik Davis, representing the developer, said the
land was very pretty and that it was too bad to use it for commercial uses.
Mrs. Maher did not feel the plan was well laid out. firs. Hurd pointed out that
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer <
Re: Next week's agenda items
Date: 4/6/84
2) Fassett's, Shelburne Road
Proposed lots are conforming, lot #2 is at minimum square footage required,
others exceeds required. Access to lots 2 and 3 will be directly across from
Harbor Ridge Road, an easement will be provided over lot #3 allowing access to
lot #2.
Access to lot #1 must be resolved, at sketch plan review access was suggested
off the existing private roadway located southerly of the lot.
If access is permitted of Shelburne Road it should be located as near to the
northerly property line as possible. Access permits will be required from
the State Highway Agency. Lot #1 provides utilities to Fassett's Bakery,
easements will be necessary.
Suggest tabling any action until issue of access is resolved with the Highway
Department.
3) Pomerleau, Shelburne Road
A Planned Commercial Development is proposed on approximately 30 acres, the
uses are as follows: 75,000 square feet of retail area; 30,000 square feet
of office area; 200 room motel and a 3,000 square foot restaurant.
Major issues, entrance road, proposed directly across from Laurel Hill Drive,
signals at this intersection should be considered.
Estimated sewer usage for this project being approximately 37,000 g.p.d.
Presently no uncommitted capacity is available at the Bartlett Bay plant.
Right-of-way for the proposed Southern Connector must be considered. Entrance
to proposed restaurant adjacent to a residential development (1185 Shelburne
Road) .
Connector to the K-Mart Shopping Center is possible and should be considered.
Removal of existing curb cut at Burger King Restaurant.
4) L.T.H. Associates, Harbor Ridge Road
The area is zoned Commercial II District. Understand that Planning Commission
intended to provide for Planned Commercial Development with mixed uses within
both commercial districts. However, the proper language is not provided with-
in the zoning regulations, amendments as proposed will correct that.
Proposed are 100 residential units on approximately 15 acres, which averages a
density of seven units per acre.
NORTH COUNTRY PLANNING
P.O. Box 333
Winooski, Vermont 05404
(802) 655-3661
December 7, 1983
South Burlington City Council
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Councilmen,
I am writing on behalf of the Pomerleau Real Estate Company
concerning a proposed Planned Commercial Development on Shelburne Road.
The property in question lies just south of the Justgold (K-Mart) shopping
center, has considerable frontage on Shelburne Road, and backs up along
its entire western boundary to the railroad tracks. As you are well aware,
the proposed South Burlington Connector has been designed to parallel the
railroad tracks, and a long section would cross our planned development.
Initial sketch plans for a 30 acre development on the Pomerleau
property and a potential connection to the abutting 35 acre Fayette
property to the South have just been submitted to the Planning Commission.
I wish to emphasize that provisions for connection to the proposed South
Burlington Connector have been part of our planning from the outset. The
following items have already been included in the sketch plan:
1) Reservation of a 150 foot wide corridor for the South Burlington
Connector along the entire western boundary of the property.
2) Designation of one point of intersection with the South Burlington
Connector that potentially can serve 2500 feet of frontage for both the
Pomerleau and Fayette properties.
3) Construction of a commercial boulevard from the intersection with
the South Burlington Connector extending to and directly lining up with
Laurel Hill Drive.
4) Erection of traffic signals and turning lanes at the new commercial
boulevard and Shelburne Road intersection (also serving Laurel Hill Drive).
5) Relocation of the existing Burger King curb cut away from Shelburne
Road and onto the new commercial boulevard.
We are able to provide the connecting roads through our development
and to reserve the necessary corridor for the South Burlington Connector,
but we must seek your help in getting the Connector itself built as soon as
page 2
12/7/83
South Burlington Connector/Pomerleau PCD
possible. Planning funds for the Connector currently are listed at the
bottom of the State's 5-year plan, but recent discussions of Route 7
corridor traffic problems by yourselves, the Town of Shelburne, the
Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, and the Vermont Agency
of Transportation all indicate that now is the appropriate time to seek
advancement of the timetable for construction.
We also suggest that South Burlington voters might be more likely
to approve the Connector with some design modifications. Separated
crossings are desirable for a "cadillac" design, but at -grade crossings
are consistent with the Burlington portion of the Connector and should
provide acceptable traffic flow. The number of crossings, of course,
must.be limited.
We will be happy to participate in any discussions on the future
of the Route 7 corridor, and we hope that you will make this one of your
top priorities.
Sincerely,
David H. Spitz
cc: William Szymanski
Richard Ward
Ernest Pomerleau
Colin Lindberg
Douglas Fitzpatrick
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN
1)- Name, address, and phone number of:
a. owner of record Antonio B . Pomerleau
b. Applicant Pomerleau Real Estate
c. Contact person Ernest A. Pomerleau
2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including
number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s).
Planned commercial development including such things as a motel,
retail area, and other uses. See Attached Plot Plan:
3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc)
Lessee
4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties
Please see attached list
S) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements,
covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.
Per Plot Plan
6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities
such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.
To be engineered
7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or
by the.South Burlington Planning Commission ;which affect the proposed: �sub-
division, and include `,the dates of such actions:
None
8) Submit four copies of a sketch plan showing the following information:
1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties.
2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belonging to owner of
record. and (b)'proposed subdivision.
3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of
existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and cove-
nants.
4) Type of, location, and approximate size- of existing Id proposed streets,
utilities, and open space.
5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic).
6) location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property
and surrounding area.
da to
Abutters - Pomerleau Property
Property Address
303 & 503 Queen City Park Road
403 Queen City Park Road
533 Queen City Park Road
929 Shelburne Road
977 Shelburne Road
1041 Shelburne Road
1075 Shelburne Road (Cemetery)
1095 Shelburne Road
1175 Shelburne Road
Mail inq Address
Green Mtn. Power Corp.
25 Green Mnt. Drive
So. Burlington, VT 05401
Champlain Water District
PO Box 2085
So. Burlington, VT 05401
Baird Children's Center
1110 Pine Street
Burlington, VT 05401
Justgold Properties
1304 Midland Avenue
Yonkers, NY 10704
Lowell T. & Susan G. Spillane
Tamarack Shores
Shelburne VT 05482
Wesco, Inc.
25 No. Prospect St.
Burlington, VT 05401
City of So. Burlington
575 Dorset St.
So. Burlington, VT 05401
San Remo Realty Co.
PO Box 2009
50 Joy Drive
Soitth Rurlington; VT 05401
Fayette Co., Inc.
PO Box 7
Burlington, VT 05401
COLIN P. LINDBERG ARCHITECT
120 Lake Street • Burlington, Vermont 05401
802-864-4950 802-863-5790
November 28, 1983
Mr. Dick Ward
Planning Administrator
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Ref: South Burlington Development Park (Pomerleau Property)
Dear Dick:
Enclosed please find an application for preliminary sketch plan together with
four copies of the site plan.
In the application I have included a location map, a completed form for application
of sub -division, a list of all the abutters, a brief outline sheet that reviews
key issues contained in the site plan as well as a site plan at 1" = 100'.
It is my understanding that the planning commission will be meeting in the
evening of December 13, 1983 and at that time we will be present with additional
aerial photographs and copies of the site plan to review the preliminary issues
that are under consideration.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
b"�. P.
Colin P. Lindberg,
CPL/jcs
cc: Mr. Ernest Pomerleau
Mr. David Spitz
Mr. Doug Fitzpatrick
No Text
COLIN P. LINDBERG ARCHITECT
120 Lake Street • Burlington, Vermont 05401
802-864-4950 802-863.5790
November 22, 1983
South Burlington Development Park - #329
KEY ISSUES
1. Entrance road alignment with Laurel Hill at a signal.
2. Right-of-way for new access road 60'
Right-of-way planned. 150' (connector)
3. Connection to existing parking at K-Mart, Big Boy's and Burger King.
4. Burger King curb cut on Shelburne Road removed.
5. Road planned for future link to connector with on grade intersection.
Access road to southern property connecting to Shelburne Road at
a signal.
6. Initial Functions:
a. 130 room motel
b. 60,000 square feet of retail
C. 30,000 square feet of offices
d. Restaurant
7. Time table, winter review, spring approvals, summer construction.
CPL/jcs
No Text
i
Q .
a
COLIN P. LINDBERG ARCHITECT
120 Lake Street • Burlington, Vermont 05401
802-864-4950 802-8b3-5790
December 8, 1983
Memo - South Burlington Development Park - #329
To: Mr. Doug Fitzpatrick
Mr. Ernest Pomerleau
Mr. David Spitz
Mr. Dick Ward
The meeting that was scheduled for sketch plan review, Tuesday evening, December
13, with the South Burlington Planning Commission needs to be rescheduled due
to a conflict in overlapping meetings.
Dick Ward indicated that the earliest we could reschedule would be in the first
week of January, 1984.
We will meet again Tuesday, December 13, 2:00 p.m. at 120 Lake Street, to cover
the loose ends.
Sincerely,
Colin P. Lindberg, A.I.A.
CPL/jcs
COLIN P. LINDBERG ARCHITECT
120 Lake Street • Burlington, Vermont 05401
8U2-864-4950 802-863-5790
March 7, 1984
Mr. Dick Ward
Planning Administrator
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Ref: South Burlington Development Park (Pomerleau Property)
Dear Dick:
Enclosed please find an application for preliminary sketch plan together with
four copies of the site plan.
In the application I have included a location map, a completed form for application
of sub -division, a list of all the abutters, a brief outline sheet that reviews
key issues contained in the site plan as well as a site plan at 1" = 100'.
It is my understanding that the planning conxnissiQn will be meeting in the
evening of March 27th, 1984 and at that time we will be present with additional
aerial photographs and copies of the site plan to review the preliminary issues.
that are under consideration.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
b".-V �.
Colin P. Lindberg,
CPL/jcs
cc: Mr. Ernest Pomerleau
Mr. David Spitz
Mr. Doug Fitzpatrick
No Text
COLIN P. LINDBERG ARCHITECT
120 Lake Street • Burlington, Vermont 05401
802-864-4950 802-863-5790
March 7, 1984
South Burlington Development Park - #329
vry Treiii-C
1. Entrance road alignment with Laurel Hill at a signal.
2. Right-of-way for new access road 60'
Right-of-way planned. 150' (connector)
3. Connection to existing parking at K-Mart, Big Boy's and Burger King.
4. Ourger King curb cut on Shelburne Road removed.
5. Road planned for future link to connector with on grade intersection.
Access road to southern property connecting to Shelburne Road at
a signal.
6. Initial Functions:
a. 200 room motel
b. 75,000 square feet of retail
C. 30,000 square feet of offices
d. Restaurant
7. Time table, winter review, spring approvals, summer construction.
CPL/jcs
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN
1) Name, address, and phone number of:
a. Owner of record Antonio B . Pomerl eau
b. Applicant
Pomerl eau Real Estate
c. Contact person Ernest A. Pomerleau
2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including
number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s).
Planned commercial development including such things as a motel,
retail area, and other uses. See Attached Plot Plan.
3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc)
Lessee
4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties
Please see attached list
5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements,
covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.
Per Plot Plan
6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities
such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. _
To be engineered
7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or
by the .South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the proposed sub-
.,
division, and include `.the dates of such actions:
None
8) Submit four copies of a sketch plan showing the following information:
1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties.
2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belonging to owner of
record. and (b) proposed subdivision.
3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of
existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and cove-
nants.
4) lype of, location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets,
utilities, and open space.
5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic).
6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property
and surrounding area.
da to
Abutters - Pomerleau Property
Property Address
303 & 503 Queen City Park Road
403 Queen City Park Road
533 Queen City Park Road
929 Shelburne Road
977 Shelburne Road
1041 Shelburne Road
1075 Shelburne Road (Cemetery)
1095 Shelburne Road
1175 Shelburne Road
Mailinq Address
Green Mtn. Power Corp.
25 Green Mnt. Drive
So. Burlington, VT 05401
Champlain Water District
PO Box 2085
So. Burlington, VT 05401
Baird Children's Center
1110 Pine Street
Burlington, VT 05401
Justgold Properties
1304 Midland Avenue
Yonkers, NY 10704
Lowell T. & Susan G. Spillane
Tamarack Shores
Shelburne VT 05482
Wesco, Inc.
25 No. Prospect St.
Burlington, VT 05401
City of So. Burlington
575 Dorset St.
So. Burlington, VT 05401
San Remo Realty Co.
PO Box 2009
50 Joy Drive
South Burlington, VT 05401
Fayette Co., Inc.
PO Box 7
Burlington, VT 05401
•' •,:i -.-.- c "'""f _...p.c•�.�._"-,�><1aJ nor
[ •,r:, �-. L .,. �.ai �'�Li4" �� ��M. t.y�..,� ,,/ `. rJ Fos)(/� �.�r i��' �: I.•.....-.-,._...
t . _ •
All
1; `4
II 1 %1
' � -- ...- .... i•..�{, _rs-=rv-�'' _ � •> \_ ,.ems' '�� '- ,•, .. ,- _`!'; .• h \ 1�� � i•r \ \\ `` 1 -
/`•' .. 1� 1 ` _ M _ z y, 3 U '.! �•r, d - /� '' I I d' �r fir/ ' ,� I l I l 4 \•. , a -
s_j F,WMNW
r
-
`. - ,'�• j — ` y , � � � z F'� , a � _ : 3, »s ; �� :._ -� � � a •� 11 ' i ..." ,;,-•- ����� , �' � i I \ I � . 1, 11-�'�.•.�""'��-• � �- : �1, '�i� .
• // * !/ o p if v � ,1 1, l 1 ' / .. ,.. ., � ... "�� , v Cr--- - _ - � \ 1 II rr• r •` l ..1. r�''. �'` .� �� ' - � , � �n �y
t
' p
l
''�.. _�� I � C _.__._. _ I � �-�.r-..� ter„^- � .. � W �' _ r A �. ' � \�,.� •�J,.-...� ,
H
�e
ff
l
` s •� ,
r1
' A rlAP
4'<'
da a
_9 j
_ say
TAM Am
; 0 RETAIL i TS,000 lost
/ 6' M....T6 L �� �o 1I MOTEL + 200 .00.io
�, i OFFICE, 30,000 so It
� mom I'' RESTAURANT 3,000 to n , -- .... : i�
:.�...�, ......sell•••. _.t.
v ... ..ease •
,I � -+. -�.: ....>,.. � '«_ � •• •� ueMeuuuuu • su•e sus � - _ ...� i v. I Y , � � _ _ ;� {
puea•see•aeaoseseaoatu.seveoVa.aes
' �t � fir•'-�•�+«.,•+..�. ••..
TT I � ee1�l �"�'J' �"�-'J•... •ice �'�C� T-.
rr
Y
-�r � ��.coo
'7 U
�, � ��. .