Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP-85-0000 - Supplemental - 0981 Shelburne Road2. PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 28, 1985 Mr. Burgess moved to continue the site plan until two weeks from tonight, June 11, at 7:30 pm at City Hall. Mr. Belter seconded the motion and all voted for it. 'gnsider sketch plan application of George E. Watson for two lot subdivision located at 40 Birch Street Mr. Watson noted that Birch Street was a dirt road and had not been accepted by the City yet. He said he owned 3 lots and would like to enlarge one and build a new house. No one had any problem with the plan. Consider site plan application of Shelburne Road Trust, Peter Collins, agent for construction of a 2900 sq. ft. addition to Burger King, located at 981 Shelburne Road Mr. Collins noted that the building was 10 years old and in need of some renovation. They want to enclose the present patio area and make a play room and function room. In addition, they will add an office to the north side of the building. They now have 86 indoor seats and a total of 134, and after the renovation they wi11_have 118 seats inside and none outside. One of the Burger King representatives said that after the renovation there would be 80 seats where there are now 86 and the function room would pick up the rest of the seats. This will be an area for birthday parties, etc., but it can be used for ordinary seating as well. Mr. Collins noted that Burger King did not feel that more parking spaces had been needed, but they added some because the regulations required it. He said the lot was never full now, and he said that in Burger King's experience, improvements like this meant that year-round the restaurant would be full more often, but peak traffic would not increase. Mrs. Maher did not feel the additions would add many more cars. Landscaping was discussed. It will be redesigned in front, but the back will not be touched. The Commission mentioned removing 18 spaces to the rear of the lot and putting grass in there. If the spaces are needed in the future, they can be paved and striped. Mr. Dooley said he was not convinced on the traffic issue. Mr. Dooley moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Shelburne Road Trust for the construction of a 2938 SQft addition to the Burger King Restaurant at 981 Shelburne Road as depicted on a set of plans entitled "Burger King Restaurant, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Jan Company,Inc. of Johnston, Rhode Island and Judd Brown Designs, dated 7 25 85 and 4 12 85 with the following stipulations: 1. The sidewalk shall be continuous across the driveway and at the same elevation relative to the road curbing as tie existing sidewalk. 2. The landscaped islands shall be protected with concrete curbs. 3. A $7,000 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. 4. 18 parking spaces are waived. The applicant may remove the 18 spaces to the west of the lot and in the center and grass over that area. 3. PLANNING CUMMISSION MAY 28, 1985 5. Building permits shall be obtained within 6 months. Mr. Belter seconded the motion and it carried with Mr. Door—ey voting no. Consider site plan application of Rivco for the construction of a 24,000 sq. ft. building on two floors as a storage distribution facility, on lot #6. Gregory Industrial Park Mr. Dugan said the lot would be heavily landscaped. Mrs. Maher said she would prefer to see evergreens. There will be 14 parking spaces. The building will be metal and 26' tall at the highest point. Mr. Dooley moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of RIVCO Michael Dugan, agent, for a 24,000 sq. ft. storage distribution facility on lot i6 of Gregory Industrial Park as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan for New Building - RIVCO Inc. prepared by Michael Dugan and dated 5 15 85 with the following stipulations: 1. A $12,000 bond for landscaping shall be posted prior to permit. The landscaping plan shall be amended to substitute for the mountain ash at the east and north sides of the building appropriate evergreen trees as approved by the City Planner, 2. A revised plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to permit that shows the method of handling storm water-_ 3. A depressed concrete curb shall be constructed across the entire curb opening. 4. The revised plan shall show the land reserved for sewage pumping station and sewer line easements. 5. Building permits shall be obtained within 6 months. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion and all voted aye. Consider site plan application of Harold and David Brown for use of property and existing barn as a golf driving range located at Brown's Animal Hospital. 017 Williston Road Ms. Bechtel said this had been approved by the 'Zoning Board with two stipulations - that lighting will be for security only and not for night use, and that there be some kind of barrier to prevent balls from landing in the neighbors' yards. Mr. Dugan noted that as part of the proposal, the applicant would make a better access to the property. There will be a shared curb cut with PJ's Auto which will be 24' wide. Mr. Dugan noted that he was acting for the owners of both properties here. They will sell each other land to make these improvements. Mr. Dugan said the golf tees would be oriented to the southwest to keep them away from neighbors' yards, and there will be low barriers between each of the tees to keep balls in a straight line. Mr. Lavallee said he lived in a house very close to this area and he felt this plan would make his house unsafe. He is about 240' from the tees, he said and he was concerned about being hit by fast-moving golf balls. Mr. Jacob felt some kind of barrier out a little ways from the Lavallee property was in order. r� F Exterior Liaht Fixtures VFT Series Shown g6"�7_ 47)5— #' ellxle?� Manufacturer: ........ RUUD LIGHTING, INC. Model No.: ............ SE3417-M Description: ........... 175 Watt Metal Halide building mounted wall light with vandal proof polycarbonate lens. 7 year finish warranty- 5 years fixture. Specifications: ....... 12 " square x 8" deep Terms: .................. Prepaid orders get 25% discount Lead Time: ............ Usually in stock Sales Contact: ....... Steve Hart -National Accounts Manager Order Contact: ...... Jeannie Mascarette-Customer Service Address:...............9201 Washington Avenue Racine, WI 53406 Ship Address: ........ Same as above Toll Free Phone: .... (800) 236-7000 Phone: .................. (414) 886-1900 Fax:......................(414) 886-1721 Toll Free Fax: ....... (800) 236-7500 Description Model No. Fac. Direct Fixtures (Vertical Burn) ............................. V FT2499-M.................................................... $316.88 Fixtures (Vertical Burn) ............................. OV2499-M..................................................... $315.00 Fixtures (Horizontal Burn) ......................... CF3499-M 100OW .......................................... $276.00 Fixtures (Horizontal Burn) ......................... CF3440-M 40OW .......................................... $1 74.00 Mounting Brackets ................................... PB-2A4 TENON 4"......................................... $52.00 Mounting Brackets ................................... PB-2A5 TENON 5"......................................... $62.00 Retrofits Brackets .................................... PB-2R2.375................................................... $92.00 Retrofits Brackets .................................... PB-3R2.375................................................... $104.00 Poles 5" Square ....................................... PS5S25STBZ 25".......................................... $340.00 Poles 4" Square ....................................... PS4S25STBZ 25"/180.................................... $266.00 Poles 4" Square ....................................... PS4S25CTBZ 25"/120.................................... $240.00 Anchor Belts ............................................ Included with Poles......................................... N/A Photometry.............................................. N/L............................................................... N/L Wallpack.................................................. SE3417-M 175W ............................................ $116.00 Softfit Lights ............................................. MRC041 7-1 1 75W.......................................... $11 5.00 Softfit Lights ............................................. MRC0410-1 10OW .......................................... $130.00 Floodlight................................................. N/L............................................................... N/L Concrete Pour Steel Base ......................... N/L............................................................... N/L Installation - Concrete Cut ........................ N/L............................................................... N/L Installation - Black Top Cut ....................... N/L............................................................... N/L Freight ..................................................... $1 ,000 or More Free Freight Except Poles........ N/A Warranty .................................................. 5 Years on Fixture 7 Years on Finish ........................................... N/A Equipment Purchasing Guide C-22 Effective May 1, 1996 through Feb. 28, 1997 May 31, 1985 Attorney Peter Collins P.O. Box 1307 Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Shelburne Road Trust, Burgerk$ing Dear Peter: Enclosed are the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting. You may file for a building permit after posting the landscaping bond. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg 1 Encl 5/28/85 JSB MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Site Plan application of Shelburne Road Trust for the construction of a 2938 square foot addition to the Burger King Restaurant at 981 Shelburne Road as depicted on a set of plans entitled "Burger King Restaurant, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Jan Company, Inc., of Johnston, Rhode Island and Judd Brown Designs, dated 7/25/80 revised 3/13/85 and 4/12/85 with the following stipulations: 1. The sidewalk shall be continuous across the driveway and at the same elevation relative to the road curbing as the exist- ing sidewalk. 2. The landscaped islands shall be protected with concrete curbs. 3. A $7,500 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. 4. Building permits shall be obtained within 6 months. � �, U) 6" "'J Iz- S Date Received �--% y 1 \'I It' By Date Application Completed and Received By By CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: (a) Owner of Record Lauren P. Merrihew, John H. Waterhouse and Ann Waterhouse (b) Applicant Shelburne Road Trust (c) Contact Person Peter M. Collins, Esq., P.O. Box 1307, Burlington ,Vermont 05402 Phone - 658-2311 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 981 Shelburne Road 3) PROPOSED USE(S): Burger King Restaurant 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e., # of units, floor area, etc.) 5050 square feet; 80,000 square foot lot size �_� - �.,L'° .t 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) N/A No change. 6) COST ESTIMATES: (a) Buildings $120,000.00 (b) Landscaping $7,500.00 (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) 7) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE ASAP �z e 0 06& T 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) No change. 9) PEAK HOUR(S) OF OPERATION 11:30 - 1:30 5:30 - 7:30 No chance. 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION 117 is to Duly Authorized Agent City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658-7955 May 24, 1985 Peter Collins P.O. Box 1307 Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Burger King, Shelburne Road Dear Peter: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the agenda and my memo and Bill Szymanski's memo for the May 28, 1985 Commission meeting. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg Encls M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: May 28, 1985 agenda items Date: May 24, 1985 4) BURGER KING, SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Sidewalk shall be continuous across the driveway and the same elevation relative to road curbing as existing sidewalk. No dipping of sidewalk on driveway. 2. Landscaped islands should be protected with concrete curbs. 5) GREGORY AND DAUGHTERS LOT #6, WILLISTON ROAD 1. Plan must show method of handling storm water. 2. A depressed curb shall be constructed across the entire curb opening. 3. Land reserved for sewage pumping station and sewer line easements shall be shown on plan. 6) GOLF DRIVING RANGE (BROWN) 1. Method of handling storm water runoff from parking lot and en- trance drive shall be shown on the plans. 7) GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1. Existing sewage manhole of south-west corner of site shall be adjusted to grade of parking lot. 2. Existing curb opening along east side of site shall be closed by removing existing depressed curb and constructing a new barrier curb. 3. New curb opening shall be as shown on landscaping plan constructed with a concrete depressed curb. Memorandum May 28, 1985 agenda items May 24, 1985 Page 2 There are unused (unclaimed?) spaces between the old O'Dell Parkway and the new angled entrance drive as well as between Agel Corman and the Old Board. The Attorney for the Factory Outlet Center, Bill Schroeder told me the 50 foot right-of-way and O'Dell Parkway provided an "L" shaped access to Shelburne Road for the area establishments. The right-of-way still exists in everyone's deeds but the angled driveway provides a more direct traffic flow to a signalized intersection. This does not ignore the fact that Mr. Thomas's parking lot was disrupted by this through lane. I believe the spaces proposed by the applicants are sufficient for the use. However, it should be clear that if they are claimed and counted for this use, they can not be reclaimed by anyone for a future use, unless they are used in off -hours. 3) GEORGE E. WATSON, 40 BIRCH STREET This sketch plan shows the re -subdivision of 3 existing lots into 2 lots. (Our tax maps show the 3 lots as one lot), It is located on Birch Street, off of Sunset Avenue and Hinesburg Road. The area is zoned R4. One new lot will be .27 acres (12,000 square feet); '`he other will be .38 acres and has an existing house. There seems to be an exist- ing 50 r.o.w. on Ying Liu's land to the south. Prior to Final Plat, the applicant should insure permanent access to the new lot across this r.o.w. or provide access across the front lot to the new lot. 44) BURGER KING, 981 SHELBURNE ROAD The applicant proposes to construct a 2938 square foot addition to the Burger King Restaurant by expanding the building to 5050 square feet. The Zoning Board granted approval for a multiple and conditional use. Access and Circulation: The existing driveway and curb cut will remain. The parking lot is expanded and the drive -through entrance is moved further west towards the back of the lot. Parking: This restaurant requires and proposes 102 parking spaces. Memorandum May 28, 1985 agenda items May 24, 1985 Page 3 Landscaping: The proposed addition requires $3600 in landscaping costs. The landscaping plan exceeds this requirement. The lot coverage is exactly at the maximum allowed. Sewage: Technically, this addition does not require a sewer allocation since the number of seats is decreased from 134 (86 inside and 48 outside) to 118 inside. The State counts outside seats the same as inside seats even though seats outside are not used year round. 5) RIVCO, LOT #6, GREGORY INDUSTRIAL PARK The applicant proposes to construct a 24,000 square feet industrial building on lot #6 at the corner of Gregory Drive and Williston Road. The lot is 1.85 acres in this Industrial -Commercial District. Access and Circulation: The entrance drive is aligned with the drive -way of lot #1. A driveway loops to the side of the building for loading and unloading. Parking: Ten spaces are required; fourteen are proposed. There is an area for truck turn -around and delivery. Landscaping: The formula requires $12,500 in landscaping costs. The plan meets this requirement. Other: The sewer allocation was made at the original subdivision. The applicant projects approximately 50 trips per day. (see Bill's memo) 6) BROWN DRIVING RANGE, WILLISTON ROAD The applicant proposes to convert the back yard (over 10 acres) to a driving range. The barn will be used for the golf business. The Zoning Board approved this proposal with the stipulations that the driving area shall be controlled and that a barrier shall be designed to keep balls from LaVallee property. Access and Circulation: The existing driveway will be closed and a new shared driveway will be constructed to serve the Brown residence, the driving range and P.J.'s Auto. This straightens the access to P.J.'s Auto. Parking: 10 parking spaces are provided and should be sufficient for this use. CAA 6urv� 1ij r\ Kf, -el o(o �� �� Sk c4c co"i o o k 3-0- C- 6,Lt 1010C) VJ- jot 7:--- `-D-r 1 v- \ (\ Roim� 119J -- PRESENTATION PROCEEDURES FOR APPELLANTS TO THE SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT The Zoning Board Adjustment is a quasi-iudicial body empowered to hear appeals to the Zoning regulations. These regulations have the force and -effect of law. It is the responsibility of you, the petitioner to present your documented arguments as to why the Board should grant a variance in your case. The Board has little discretionary power and each of the following five criteria must be met before the Board can grant a variance. Not one - three or four but all five of the following facts must be found by the Board before a variance canes granted. Please come prepared to present all the facts necessary for the Board to make an objective and intelligent decision. (Refer to Sec. 446E of the Planning and Development Act of 1969 for further clarification). 1. That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 1. That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 3. That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 4. That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 5. That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. 5d