HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-80-0000 - Supplemental - 0938 0950 Shelburne Road (2)PLANNING COMMISSION
2.
SEPTEMBER 25, 1980
said that if the interpretation were so broad as to allow any number of units
desired, he felt there would be public opposition to the concept. Mr. Poger
replied that one could not construct any number he wanted.
The Zoning Board had denied the application on September 22, 1960.
Application by(Rosario Cannizzaro for site plan apT)roval of two offices and six
apartments at 938-950 Shelburne Road
The Zoning Board had approved this appeal on Sept. 22.
Mr. Ron Schmucker represented the applicants. He stated that 2 driveways on
Shelburne Road would be closed and an in and out 24' wide curb cut made on
Brewer Parkway. He noted that a letter had been submitted to the Zoning Board
from the neighbors to the east stating that they had no objections (copy on file
with Zoning Administrator). Mr. Poger read the letter.
Mr. Schmucker said that 1 building on the lot contained 4 apartments and the
other has 2 plus a music store (1568 sq. ft.) and a day care center (768 sq. ft.).
The day care center also occupied part of the first building. The real estate
business will occupy the former music store space and the day care space will
be rented to a commercial tenant with a permitted use in the zone.
There are 17 parking spaces outside and 2 under the building. Ordinance
requirements call for 23 spaces, but Mr. Schmucker said leases for the apartments
would limit the.owners to one car only and would require that guests park off the
lot. He also said that the owner would be there during the day and would police
the situation. The apartments are 2 efficiencies and 4 2-bedroom units.
Mr. Poger said it had been the Commission's experience that one could
expect 2 cars per unit and he felt that students might rent the apartments and
have many cars there. Mr. Schmucker replied that the real estate business of
Mr. Cannizzaro would operate from about 8:30-5:30 and that about the time the
business closed, the apartment residents would be returning from work. He also
noted that there was a demand for apartments in the area and that would allow the
owner to restrict who could live there. Since Air. Cannizzaro will be earning his
living from this property, he will not want traffic to be a problem.
Xr. Spitz noted that there was a provision for overlapping in the ordinance
and he felt the apartments would only require 10 spaces, not 11, because of the
efficiencies. The office use which is not specified would only need 4 spaces, he
felt, and the real estate office would require 8 normally, but he felt that,
because of the description of this one, it would only require 6. He felt that
10 residential and 10 commercial spaces were required and he also felt that an
overlap of 3 spaces was not unreasonable.
Ins. Poger noted that ::r. :Schmucker was sure the parking was adequate, but
he wondered what would happen if another use came in and he asked if the applicants
could tell the Commission that no more than a certain number of cars per hour or
trips per unit would occupy the other office space. I'.r. Schmucker said they wculd
be glad to do that and that they understood that the permission given by the
Commission was conditioned on them meeting the presentation as made.
Mr. Schmucker said they had estimated the trips per day of the present uses
on the lot at 85 and that with the new uses, they felt there would only be 65•
4 dead trees on the lot will be re=oved and replaced and a sign base will
be re--oved. Traffic flow will be marked clearly with signs and arrows and the
building will be painted and stained.
'�• 3
PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 23,1980
The paved area will be retained and the rest of the parking will be red
crushed stone.
Snow removal was discussed. It will be pushed along the edge of the hedges
and tree line. Mr. Spitz felt that the hedge might have to be moved farther
over in front of the diagonal spaces to leave room there - snow from that area
might have to be removed. Mr. Cannizzaro said he would have to live with the
possibility of removing snow 1 or 2 times a year and Dir. Walsh wanted to include
that as a stipulation. Mr. Ewing felt the Commission should require that the
spaces be kept open, but what was done with the snow was Mr. Cannizzaro's business.
Mr. Mona noted that, if needed at a later time, trees could be cut to allow
for more parking and smaller --plantings could replace them. This would only be
done if it had to be.
Mr. Ewing moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the
site plan application of Rosario V. Cannizzaro for continued use of six apartments
and two new offices as depicted on a plan entitled "Design proposal for 936 &
950 Shelburne Road", prepared by Christopher Dunn, dated September 23, 1980,
subject to the following stipulations:
1. Curb openings on Shelburne Road shall be closed with granite or concrete
curbs.
2. New shrubs on the Shelburne Road side of the parking lot shall be
located at.least 2 1 2 feet in front of the parking area.
3. A landscaping bond of $5200 shall be provided to cover removal of dead_
trees and lawn and driveway area improvements as well as new plantings.
4. This approval expires in 6 months.
5. Snow shall not block the parking spaces.
6. Any change in the use from the owner's real estate office and a rented
low traffic intensity use office shall come back to the Planning Commission for
approval.
Mr. Jacob seconded the motion.
D'Ir. Mona requested that Mr. Cannizzaro inform the Commission of the use the
first tenant will have. Mr. Schlnucker said the applicant wound not mind doing so
and would send a letter.
The motion carried unanimously.
Continuation of public hearing on application by L.E. Farrell Company for final
plat approval of a 3 lot subdivision on Allen Road, also application by the L.E.
Farrell Company for site plan approval of a soft drink bottling nlant consisting
of 2 buildings 78,400 sq. f t. and 9,600 sq. ft.7 on lot 3 of the proposed subdivision
Mr. La..-phere said this was now a 3 lot subdivision and that Pepsi would take
over the =_tire parcel. The Pepsi building will be on lot 3. The garage has
been moved foreard and the number of parking spaces has remained the same. The
Fire Chief wants one of the hydrants moved. '�r. Lamphere said they would tie
into the CWD water line, bring utilities do m the street, and construct a retention
basin.
Mr. Walsh noted that a right turn lane
noted that those stipulations should still
There will be 14 route trucks and 1-2
about 50 e=ployees. The trucks will leave
had been discussed before and it was
exist.
tra lerz in this operation, as well as
about 7 am and'be back between 3 and 4:30pm.
Date Received
BY
mate ,Application Completesand Received
BY By
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF:
(a) Chaner of Record Arthur w. Mason
(b)
Applicant Rosario V. Cannizzaro, option holder
(c)
Contact Person Rosario V. Cannizzaro
2)
PROJECT
STREET ADDRESS 938 - 950 Shelburne Rd.
3)
PROPOSED USE (S) Continued use of six apartments - converting retail outlet
into
two offices.
4)
SIZE
OF PROJECT (i.e., # of units, floor area, etc.) six apartments-
sfkk-48 Shk6L-eb
2
�p
offices- total floor space 938A - 1732 each floor 95% 2,336
each floor
5)
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) Real Estate offftw/ro
salespersons
1 secretary
6)
COST
ESTIMATES:
(a)
Buildings repaint, carpet etc. $8,000.00
(b)
Landscaping reseed lawn, new trees, shrubs & hedge -
materials $1,250.
(c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) remove dead trees, _
grade new lawn and driveway area, crushed stones, curbs $3,950.00
7) ESTI14ATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE Start Oct. '80 complete by end of May 81'
8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) 65 cars in and out
9) PMK HOUR(S) OF OPERATION fairly level all day - s
�-rviCDAyS + sue
10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Monday - FridayAby appt. onl
2/7/
DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
/�/' '(�� 1l
�.��
����
� �
� �
� �
� � � i ��
� - �..� �
� �
� �
-_�
�� � ��
__ _�
�_ ___
�._ �
c'
Tv��cs„ sEG-��o
i OU
5
PG =11" 22 + �f
L� = 4.7
L
R
PT: 'TA zs+ ape=
ti Nf
ON
v
a
0
Q
� I
i
CLL
9_
,9 �► a o
01MLS
MULTIGIE L19TING
CANNIZZARO REAL ESTATE
950 SHELBURNE ROAD
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
802-658-2931
January 12, 1981
South Burlington Planning Commission
1175 Williston Rd.
So. Burlington, Vt. 05401
Gentlemen:
At Mr. Mona's request, I am informing the planning commission
of our new tenant in our building at 950 Shelburne Road.
The tenant is Mr. Greg Zeigler, of Vermont Hearing Aid Service,
formerly of North Winooski Avenue in Burlington. The entire
operation consists of Mr. Zeigler and a secretary /receptionist.
His clients are by appointment and average 5-6 people per day.
If you have any further questions, I will be pleased to answer
them.
Very truly �yours,
Rosario V. Cannizzaro, Realtor
CANNIZZARO REAL ESTATE
RVC/pmc
September 25, 1980
Mr. Rosario Cannizzaro
4 Laurel Hill Drive
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Mr. Cannizzaro,
Enclosed are copies of findings of fact and the Planning Commission's
site plan approval with stipulations for your application. Please submit
a final site plan map for our files containing complete title block in-
formation and an indication of where the two covered parking spaces are
located. You must also make arrangements for your landscaping bond prior
to receipt of your building permit.
DPlease call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
David H. Spitz,
City Planner
DS/mcg
DHS
9/23/80
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND/OR STIPULATIONS
For the site plan application of Rosario V. Cannizzaro for continued use of
six apartments and two new offices as depicted on a plan entitled "Design pro-
posal for 938 & 950 Shelburne Road", prepared by Christopher Dunn, dated September
23, 1980:
1) Curb openings on Shelburne Road shall be closed with granite or concrete curbs.
2) New shrubs on the Shelburne Road side of the parking lot shall be located at
least 22 feet in front of the parking area.
3) A landscaping bond of$ 5,200 shall be provided to cover removal of dead trees
and lawn and driveway area improvements as well as new plantings.
4) This approval expires in 6 months.
No Text
MEMORANDUM
Th: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: David H. Spitz, City Planner
Re: Next Week's Agenda Items >;.
Date: 8/19/80
3) Milot - Patchen Road
Applicant is still trying to work out access details and therefore has re-
quested a continuation of the public hearing.
4) Pepsi
Because of contour difficulties applicant has shifted location of the second-
ary Pepsi building resulting in the loss of one lot. Even though several items
have not been completed at this time - fire, water and legal reviews - I feel that
the changes should be looked at by the Commission.
Remaining questions from preliminary review: (a) street location is accept-
able even though it does not directly line up witt, lightly used driveway across
Allen Road; (b) sight distance at Allen Road curve is adequate by engineering
standards, and tree clearing would have minimum impact; (c) pedestrian easement
has been adequately located; (d) because of new site layout and shortened City
street, emergency easement to Shelburne has been deleted.
Other points to be resolved: (a) fire chief may want one hydrant relocated;
(b) water plans have not yet been submitted to water deparment; and (c) legal
documents for the street and water and ae,3estrian easements must still be sLb-
mitted; (d) engineering sheets must be stamped by the project engineer; (e)
reduction of parking spaces from 65 to 43 must be explained.
5) Beverage Store - Dorset Street
Application will be reviewed only if approved on Nbnday by the Zoning Board.
Applicant proposes to close off Dorset Street curb cut and to replace it with one
on San Remo Drive. Applicant also proposes to cut off joint access to abutting
property owner. Barrier design and effect on existing circulation pattern must
be reviewed.
6) Cannizzaro
Application will be reviewed only if approved on Monday by the Zoning Board.
Property currently contains six apartments and a retail piano store. Applicant
plans to replace the store with two offices including his own real estate operation.
Site is fairly crowded. Parking spaces are both too few in number and to small
in size - they will have to be revised.
Applicant proposes to close off 2 Shelburne Road curb cuts and to replace
them with one on Brewer Parkway. While the advantages are obvious, the disad-
vantage is that the new entrance will cause a new paved aisle behind the building
where a grassed buffer strip previously existed. Also, the Fire Chief will accept
either layout but prefers one entrance to remain on Shelburne Road.
7) Other Business
. If time permits, several items of Commission business (see agenda) are available
for discussion.
MEMORANDUM
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: William J. Szymanski, City *Ilanager
Re: Next Week's Agenda Items
Date: 8/19/80
4) Pepsi
1. If City is to maintain storm water filters, the area should be deeded
to the City.
5) Dorset Street -Beverage Store
1. Site drainage details must be furnished for review.
2. Existing curb cuts shall be closed by constructing concrete curbs.
3. Snow storage area should be provided.
6) Cannizzaro
1. Curb openings on Shelburne Road shall be closed with granite or concrete
curbs.
September 15, 19dU
Rosario V. Cannizaro
Cabbuzarm Real Estate
4 Laurel Hill Drive
South Burlington, Vermont 0501
Dear Mr. Cannizaro,
I have reviewed your site plat: application and find it ino:Ai,plete. please
sutirdt the following information so that scheduling of your application can
take place:
D (1) Complete property boundary dimensions.
(2) Revised parking layout to meet standards. :ur current regulation
cites a 10 foot by 16 foot stall for perpendicular parking. k 24 foot aisle
is also required. based on national standards (enclosed) for 6U0 angle,park-
ing, the following would be equivalent to a lU foot by 16 foot stall. stall
width, 11.6 feet; stall depth to "curb", 14.2 feet; aisle width, 15 feet.
i ecent experience indicates that a stall of approxirratei.y 9.5 feet-LOD,7 19
feet is more appropriate than 10 feet by 16 feet. The equivalent for bU angie
parking would be as follows: stall width, ll.0 feet; stall depth to "cures",
17.2 feet, aisle width, 15 feet.
While I feel the latter is preferable, you may submit the former since it
is contained in our ordinance. If your site planner has any questions about
the application of these standards, please have him contact iae.
(3) Revised number of parking spaces. Your plan indicates 18 spaces. our
ordinance requires 2 spaces per unit for the first three units anu lz spaces
thereafter for a toal of 11 residential parking spaces for this application. our
ordinance also requires 1 space per 2u0 square feet of office use for a total of
12 commercial spaces for this application. If you propose less than the cxxubined
requirement of 23 spaces you must justify the request.
Thank you for your cooperation in these matters.
Sincerely,
David x. Spitz,
City .Manner
D5/MCg
1 -0 0) 0 60
1*
Skull,
5tx W, d
ul
0
1q.5
A - IeV is tdt�:
el- C�ql
t 'n �01 - .. 1 11