Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 0935 0937 Shelburne Road
PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 February 27, 1995 Gary E. Juster Justgold Properties P.O. Box 291 Yonkers, New York 10704-0291 Re: K-MART PLAZA, Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Juster: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 It has come to my attention that tractor trailers are using your parking lot at the K-Mart Plaza as an overnight rest stop. These trucks run their engines all night long and are disturbing the peace of the nearby apartment residents. The use of your parking lot for this use is not authorized and the noise created by the running engines could be violating the noise standards in Section 2(b)(1) of the zoning regulations. Please take whatever steps are necessary to prevent the use of your parking lot as an overnight rest stop for tractor trailers. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, q X41 '''l G`X ✓ �) Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp LATHAM, EASTMAN, SCHWEYER & TETZLAFF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ROBERT W. EASTMAN LEON D. LATHAM, JR. BENJAMIN F. SCHWEYER ATTORN EYS AT LAW 1905-1972 THOMASJ. SHERRER 306 MAIN STREET CHARLES R. TETZLAFF NEIL D. WHEELWRIGHT P. O. BOX 568 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0568 TEL: (802) 863-2826 FAX: (8o2) 863-2820 January 6, 1993 Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: South Burlington Official Map Dear Mr. Weith: On behalf of Juster Development Company I wish to register their strong objections to the location of the future public street running across their property in a north -south direction as shown on the copy of the portion of the official map which you forwarded with your letter of October 6, 1992 addressed to Howard, Ann and Gary Juster. Incidentally, while this letter was dated October 6, it did not come to the attention of Gary Juster until after the October 19, 1992 public hearing date. The location of the future streets cuts right through the middle of my clients' property which would greatly affect both its usefulness and value. Given the fact that Juster Development Company has granted a long term lease on the property which provides for substantial useable parking space, the location of such a future street would make it impossible to provide such parking and would result in substantial financial loss to Juster Development Company. It was my clients' understanding that the prior location proposed for a street to provide a connection between the properties located on the west of Shelburne Road was to be the so-called Southern Connector. As we understand it, the location of the Southern Connector would have been in a north -south direction along and parallel to the railroad tracks. Such a location would have had no impact on the Juster property and been much less intrusive to the other lots on the west side of Shelburne Road. The present plan cuts through the middle of those lots. Mr. Joe Weith January 6, 1993 Page 2 You noted in your letter that the location of the new road would not have a tremendous impact on reducing congestion on Shelburne Road. However, the location of such a road would have a tremendous impact on Juster Development Company's use of their property. Such location is not justified on a cost/benefit approach which would hopefully take into account fairness to the owners of those lots on the west side of Shelburne Road. The purpose of this letter is to note the strong objections of my clients to both the substantive location of the proposed street, as well as the lack of opportunity on their part to be heard on the matter. Very truly yours, LATHAM, EASTMAN, SCHWEYE7&T TZLAFF, P.C. Cridrl�s R. Tetzl ff Certified Mail -Return Receipt Requested CRT:cap C:\WP50\ltr-crt\juster.sb LATHAM, EASTMAN, SCHWEYER & TETZLAFF ATTORNEYS AT LAW 308 MAIN STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 (802) 863-2826 ROBERT W. EASTMAN BENJAMIN F. SCHWEYER CHARLES R. TETZLAFF MATTHEW I. KATZ PAUL K. SUTHERLAND DAVID M. GEARIN February 10, 1981 Mr. David Spitz City Planner 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05401 RE: Juster Associates--Wellby Drug Store Dear David: In order to comply with the Planning Commission Stipulations #2, 3 and 4 from their approval of October 14, 1980, I am enclosing: a. Two copies of a revised site plan;howing both the site modifications and plan for plantings. b. The traffic study report. I spoke with Dick Ward and he indicated that you have appropriate forms to set up an escrow account for the landscaping which at the 30 of the construction would amount to $1,800. I will obtain the signature of Mr. Juster. This is to request issuance of the building permit. CRT:cf Enc. Very truly yours, LATHAM, EASTMAN, LEON D. LATHAM. JR. 1905-1972 SCHWEYER & TETZLAFF s R. Tetzlaff January 23, 1931 John Deli'Anno RFD Box 73 Shaftsbury, Vermont 05262 Dear Mr. Dell'Anno, Fhclosed are copies of your recent site plan approval with stipulations and your previous approval in October. Please note that the landscaping improvements (3% of value of building addition) must also appear on the site plan. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, David H. Spitz, City Planner DS/mcg 2 Encl W PLAN";TIIrG COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning January 27, 1981 at 7:30 pm in Road Members Present JA?VJARY 27, 1981 Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, the Conference Room, City Hall, 1175 Williston Sidney Poger, Chairman; George Mona, Ernest Levesque, Peter Jacob, Robert Walsh, Kirk Woolery, James :;wing Members Abnent none Others Present David Spitz, Planner; Charles Tetzlaff, Stephen rage, Gerry ..lot, Fay Tremblay, Richard Trudell, Peter Judge, Carl Cobb, Lillian & Nil*on Terris, Harry Davison, Stanley I.cKinley, Ronald Farrell, Barbara & :Servin Gochman, Madlyn Morrissey, Gus a Pat Calkins, Pat Smith, Littleton Long, Carolyn Long, Wilbur Newton, Pete Ozarowski, Robert Szczerbak, Arthur Aldridge, obert & Joan Hunt, Lee Moffitt, Michael & Mary Smith, Lowell Kra:.;aner, Jcb%,n. Dell'Anno, Mary ,Jane & Robert Vinson, Charles and Sandra Smith, Peter Collins, William do Shirley Hosick, Trudy Schlemmer, Donald & Shirley Laflet, John McDonald, Goraon Fischer, Collette Ozarowski, Doug Fitzpatrick Minutes of January 13, 19BI On page 2, the motion should have a period after "1/9/81" and to rest of the sentence should be deleted. Also on that page, in the fifth paragraph under the Pecor ap--,licatior., it would read that One of the members of the Commission had not felt it would be desirable to have 1 acre lots in one area and 1/4 acre lots in ar.ctZer. Mr. Ewing moved to approve the January 13, 1981 minutes as corrected and Pair. Walsh seconded. All voted for the motion. Continuation of application bv& Juster Associates for revised site plan, approvR for a aniby 5upe.r Drug Store in the Burlington Plaza shopping center on "heiburne Road Mr. Tetzlaff, representing Juster, said the present sidewalk was 6' wide. The proposal is to start at the Martin's end of the shopping center and extend the sidewalk width by 3', for a total of 9' in front of the existing stores, and then curve back to the present sidewalk in front of K-;fart, which is 12' wide. !fir. Spitz said the plan would not significantly alter the travel lane in front of the center. The front doors for the drug store would be 3' and there would be 2. Mr. :foolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission a:,IQrove the application of Juster Associates for conversion and expansion of a. previous bakery and card shop to a druirstore as depicted on a plan entitled "Site 'plan, Grading and Paving, Burlington Shopping Center" with changes initialled 1/27/81, subject to the following stipulations: 1. Previous stipulations k 2, 3 and 4 from the approval dated October 14, 1980 shall remain in effect. 2. PLANNING CCMMMISSION 2. This approval expires in 6 months. 3. It is the Commis-:ion's intention to look meeting following their submission to the Planner. Pair. Jacob seconded the motion. J.,:ti NARY 27, 1981 at the traffic counts the Mr. Mona wanted to see the new drawing that would have to be submitted and he also wanted to look at the traffic figures which would be submitted. The motion carried unanimously. Continuation of application by R. Pecor and Associates for preliminary plAt approval of a 143 unit planned unit development on Spear Street The City Attorney had submitted an opinion on this application, dated 1/26/81. Mr. Page said the plan had been dropped by 7 units to 136 and there will be 57 single family lots and 79 multi -family units. The Pheasant Way access point has been revised for better sight distance. There are now no more lots in the 1`11 area than could be there if they were to grid them off'. they have 20.6 ncres and rxopor;e 22 lots in R1. They used tnry 40,060 eq. ft. mize set forth in the Zoning Urdinrince. The access for the multi-i'rumily portion has been changed - it is wider now. It will be 20' of pavement plus shoulders at least on one side of each lane separated by a burm. A 6U' right of way to :;pear Street has been shown. Mr. Page said 7 of the lots were bisected by the zoning line and there is more than enough usable land to site the homes entirely in the R4 zone. He added that the owner could also, under conditional use, extend the boundary �6'. Mr. Spitz said the fire chief felt the new plan for the multi -family units was an improvement, but he still had some reservations. Mr. Page showed a conceptual drainage topo map. They plan to bring most of the drainage to the northerly swale on the land. This feeds into the UVM pond. They plan to divert most of the drainage to the other swale on the UVM property where it will follow that swale to the city parkland and beyond. Mr. Doug Fitzpatrick felt this would improve Mteadowood at Spear drainage in the spring. he issue of a scenic overlook came up and .dr. 123pitz said he hed checked into it. Coming from the north on Spear Street, the first good view is at the entrance to Stonehedge, but it cann.,t be sef�n from a car. Farther south the views are good where lots have not been built on yet. Regarding the proposed future street, Ar. vpitz said that a good place for an overlock migh,t be next to the right of way on the north edge of the property, but for a good view one might need 2-4 lots. pr. Spitz noted that the right of way was 60' wide and he mentioned a turn-off lane on one or both sides of that major road. After climbing the ridge to the east of Spear Street, the views are good almost anywhere along there, but a lot of land would have to be protected to keep the view. Mir. Walsh favored more than a turn-off lane for the overlook, feeling people should be able to get out of their cars. Leaving lot ff22 undeveloped until there was a pull -off area on the other side of the road was mentioned, or lot #22 could have the area at the top of it. r.:r. spitz mentioned that when the road was built, there would be a turn-off area at a major intersection. Mr. Xilot said he proposed to build 49 units without going through the Pheasant Way access unless the city and owc.er of that road agree that it will be public. At that point, if Pheasant Way is still private, he will put in the other Access so he can build the multi -family units, if the Commission wishes. It can tell him to use a private street at that point, or another access MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Conunission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next Week's Agenda items Date: 1/23/81 2) Juster/Welby Dru Applicant now proposes an additional 3 foot widening of the sidewalk from the North end of Martin's past the proposed Welby's and then tapering to the existing K-Mart sidewalk. This will provide adequate sidewalk width through- out and will not interfere with traffic flow. 3) Nowland/Pecor See other memo 4) GBIC Proposal is for a 50,000 square foot building and 250 parking spaces for light manufacturing operation. Application is for the entire 161 acre parcel, though only a relatively small portion is being proposed for development at this time. Public water and sewer will be extended. Traffic -related issues must be discussed. (1) The City's master plan shows a major future through road crossing the side. Since this parcel is not being subdivided, a through road may cause sane difficulties for the applicant. The purposes to be served by the through road should be revaluated. (2) A traffic study should be done to examine the impact of traffic from this develop- ment on existing city streets. In relation to this question, other proposed City street improvements (the I-89 interchange and the Swift Street extension) and the possibilites for their implementation should be addressed. 5) Annual and Capital Budgets 1980-1981 July - Dec. 1980 Budget Expenditures Salaries $2650 $2650 Travel 780 390 Publications, etc. 650 444 Special Printing 1500 161 Professional Assistance 7000 739 Advertising 700 334 1981-1982 Pror)osed Budget $2650 780 650 500 700 5. PLANNING COMMISSIUN JA:IiUARY 13. 1981 Application by Juster Associates for revised site -plan approval for a Welby Super Drug Store in the Burlington Plaza shopping center on Shelburne Road Mr. Charles Tetzlaff said Juster was seeking relief from the condition imposed at the October 14 meeting. Juster is converting and expanding the card shop to a Welby's and the problem is with condition #1 whi,-,h requires relocation of a door. The Commission wants a side entrance used end 'Welby's wants it closed. Mr. Tetzlaff said there was a 6' wide front sidewalk, but Mr. Mona did not think it was that wide. Mr. Poger said the Commission had wanted a side entrance because it did not feel a front one was ,safe. If the front sidewalk were 10-12' wide it would be safe. Mr. Tetzlaff said Welby's would not go through with the lease with this condition. Mr. Poger did not think the sidewalk outside was even wide enough for two people to pass without one getting off the walk. If people could walk side by side on it he would have no objection to a front door. Mr. Ewing felt the walk had to be wide enough so that people could walk around the door when it was fully opened. Mr. Poger said the Commission did not object to a front door, but wanted to keep people out of the traffic. The Commission mentioned widening the sidewalk along its entire length and/or putting barriers at the ends of the rows of parking spaces and widening the area between the stores and the rows. The Commission did not want a jog in the sidewalk and it wanted people to be able to walk from one end of the complex to the other without getting out into the travel way. Mr. Wo�lery mentioned moving the low wall back about 4'. Mr.,Tetzlaff said they would study the problem farther. Request by Greater Burlington Industrial Corporation for rezoning of R parcel Qf land on Hinesburg Road south of I-89 to industrial Mr. Bruska said the area in question had been proposed for industrial zoning by the Commission already. GBIC has an offer to buy the land if it is rezoned and there is some pressure to rezone it because there is an industrial concern which will locate in another area if this land is not available. Mr. Spitz said the area proposed for rezoning was very close to the area originally proposed by the Commission for industrial. Mr. Mona said the Commission had proposed going east from the area in question until one came to Muddy Brook. Mr. Spitz said the area in question was the smallest contiguous property which could be included. Mr. Ewing agreed the piece in the rear should also be industrial. Mr. Bruska said there were 4 parcels of land in the shaded area in question and only the large one was being purchased. The Commission felt there was an overriding interest to the city here. Mr. Mona added that the Commission had already identified this piece of land to be rezoned industrial. Mr. Woolery felt the Commission should set a schedule to complete the work on the zoning ordinance by a certain date and Mr. Spitz said he would present it within 1-4 months. Mr. Mona moved to warn a public hearing for February 3, 1981 on a zone chani-e to industrial of approximately 150 acres of land located east of Hinesburg Road ar:d south of Interstate 89. This area is cross -hatched on the David Spitz memo of 1 81. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion and it passed 7-0. Other business Mr. Spitz said Cannizzaro Real Estate had notified the Commission that its tenant would be Vermont Hearing Aid Services, with traffic of 5-6 people per day. The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 pm. Clerk MEMORANDUM Zb: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Juster/Welby Drug Date: 1/9/81 A statement of concerns by the Welby Drug Store representive is attached. Points 1 and 2 are self-explanatory. I have asked the applicant to provide more information on how points 3 and 4 create a problem. When the mall is enclosed there will still be a sidewalk in front of that portion of the building, but only 6 feet wide - a marginal amount. Quality of site plan submissions has still been poor. LATHAM, EASTMAN, SGHWEYER & TETZLAFF ATTORNEYS AT LAW 308 MAIN STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 (802) 863-2826 ROBERT W. EASTMAN BENJAMIN F. SCHWEYER CHARLES R. TETZLAFF MATTHEW I. KATZ PAUL K. SUTHERLAND DAVID M. GEARIN December 22, 1980 Mr. David Sptiz City Planner 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Mr. Spitz: In accordance with your request of December 17, 1980, I am forwarding the detailed floor and cite plans of the Wellby Drug Store layout. I would be happy to meet with you and discuss any questions you might have prior to the cite plan review. Could you advise as to the time of the Planning Commission's meeting on January 13. Very truly yours, LATHADA, EASTMAN, SCHWEYER J !� C arles R. Tetzlaff CRT:cf Enc. LEON D. LATHAM, JR. 1905-1972 ZLAFF December 17, 1980 Charles R. Tetzlaff Latham, Eastman, Schweyer & Tetzlaff 308 Main Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 y Dear Mr. Tetzlaff, I have received your letter of December 11, 1980 regarding Welby Drug Store. I wn planning to schedule a revised site plan review with the Planning Commission on Tuesday, January 13, 1981. Before final scheduling I will need a detailed floor and site plan of the preferred Welby layout so that I can review and prepare comments for the CciTmission. Sincerely, David H. Spitz, City Planner LATHAM, EASTMAN, SGHWEYER & TETZLAFF ATTORNEYS AT LAW 308 MAIN STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 (802) 863-2826 ROBERT W. EASTMAN BENJAMIN F. SGHWEYER CHARLES R. TETZLAFF MATTHEW I. KATZ PAUL K. SUTHERLAND DAVID M. GEARIN December 11, 1980 David H. Spitz Planning Department 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05401 RE: Planning Commission's October 14, 1980 approval of Juster Associates conversion and expansion in the Shopping Center on Shelburne Road for a Wellby Drug Store. Dear Mr. Spitz: You may recall I visited with you regarding the problems created by stipulation #1 in the October 14, 1980 approval given by the Planning Commission to Juster Associates, which stipulation reads as follows: "Applicant will move entrance location from east side to existing door on south side." LEON D. LATHAM. JR. 1905-1972 I reviewed with you the problems created by the stipulation which were very strongly objected to by the proposed tenants, Wellby Super Drug Stores. You at that time indicated that we should obtain the nature of the objection as well as the drawings and plans. To that end, I am enclosing an affidavit signed by the General Manager of Wellby Super Drug Stores setting forth their objections to not having a front entrance. I would request that this matter be placed on the arkenda for your next Planning Commission meeting so that we could discuss this problem further with the Commission. I would at that time have Mr. Delano present along with the detailed plan relating to the conversion and expansion. Very trgly.yours, LATHAM, EASTMAN, CRT:cf v" Charles R. Tetzla Enc. ETZLAFF M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next Week's Agenda Date: 10/10/80 2) Stonehedge Residents See memo for last meeting. 3) BPD Realty Applicant is proposing an addition of 4,800 square feet to an existing 14,400 square foot building. In the initial site plan review, the Planning Commission waived the parking requirement from 70 to 50 spaces. 35 additional spaces are now proposed which should be more than adequate. Some landscaping is being relocated. New landscaping plan is still being reviewed to insure that the required amount of new plantings are being installed over and above any relocated trees. 4) Juster Associates - Shopping Center Enclosed are letters from the property owner's representative and traffic consultant regarding a proposed conversion and ex- pansion for a Welby Drug Store in the Burlington Plaza Shopping Center. A floor plan sketch is also.enclosed. The zoning ordiance permits a drug store in a C-1 zone only within a PCD. Entire property is 12.4 acres and could qualify as a PCD. I would suggest that the applicant pursue a PCD application and provide information on the following: (a) existing level of service at those nearby intersections identified by the Planning Commission, (b) traffic counts and impact on intersection levels of service from existing shopping center traffic, (c) effect of proposed use change on traffic counts and levels of service. (d) presentation and evaluation of potential improvments for upgrading the level of service at nearby intersections, and (e) evaluation of impact of the proposed Southern and/or South Burlington connectors. As an alternative, note that if the use was changed to a drug store but not expanded, the estimated traffic would decrease from the present amount (according to the traffic consultant's reason- able trip generation values). Although the current ordinance would still not approve this circumstance, the proposed change in the ordinance (as agreed to by the Planning Commission in concept) would allow such a decreased traffic volume without PCD approval. Juster Associates 1304 Midland Avenue Yonkers, New York 10704 October 6, 1980 Mr. David Spitz, City Planner City of South Burlington 1175 Williston Road Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Mr. Spitz: I am writing to you in reference to the Burlington Shopping Center located in South Burlington, VT owned by Juster Associates of 1304 Midland Avenue, Yonkers, NY. I am requesting that a conversion of Fifth Avenue Cards and The Bakery located between the K-Mart Store and the Martin Food Store be con- verted to Wellby Super Drug Store. Wellby Drug consists of 5,983 square feet as a total area. The original Fifth Avenue Cards was 80, x 401, consisting of 3,200 square feet and The Bakery was 80' x 20' consisting of 1,600 square feet. In front of both stores there is an enclosed walkway of 201. I am requesting that the existing enclosed walkway combined with the two stores be a part of the Wellby Drug Store which will have an in and out entrance located at the existing front line of the enclosed walkway. We will attend the October 14th hearing to discuss more in detail the pro- posed plans for the Wellby Drug Store. S' cerely,, John Dell'Anno Juster Associates CC: Juster Associates 1304 Midland Avenue Yonkers, NY 10704 Mr -:Douglas J. Kennedy Dufrene & Henry, Inc. Main Street New London, NH 03257 September 12, 1980 Doug Kennedy Dufresne -henry Main Street New London, New Hampshire 03257 Dear Doug: I am enclosing a copy of South Burlington's Zoning Ordinance. The shopNing center is in a C1 district (page 1U-12). Please particularly note the planned ccrrmiercial development provision (PCD) on pages 13-15. PCUs are permitted in either Cl or C2 zones. Spon rechecking our traffic data I found that we only have information on the Williston Road and Dorset Street sections of the city. I have asked the State `I'rassportation Agency for thier most recent traffic counts and capacity analyses for Shelburne imad, and that information will be sent to you. Ibank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, David Fi. Spitz, City Planner 1 Encl September 12, 1980 l Joseph Landry Agency of Transportation 133 State Street P,bntpelier, Vermont 05602 Dear Mr. Landry, This letter is to formally request certain traffic information for Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington. The City has recently adopted a new commercial zoning ordinance which includes an analysis of capacity at intersections near a proposed development. We havegenerated our own data, including traffic counts and capacity analyses, a recent study on the Williston Road -Dorset Street --Kennedy Drive area. We would like to obtain any similar information that you might have for Shelburne Road. The current proposal before us involes the K-Mart shopping center near the intersection of Shelburne Road and the proposed Burlington southern connector. Since this proposal will be reviewed shortly, we would like to obtain data for that section of Shelburne Broad as soon as possible. Could you also send a copy of any available information to Doug Kennedy, Dufresne -henry, Main Street, New London, New Hampshire U3257. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, David H. Spitz, City Planner DS/MC9 Dufresne -Henry, Inc. Engineering Disciplines Associated Disciplines Main Street Civil Planning & Urban Development New London, New Hampshire 03257 Environmental Landscape Architecture 603-526-6924 Transportation Surveying Municipal Construction Management Mountain Applied Sciences Structural Water Quality Electrical Geologic Mechanical Hydrologic Industrial Computer September 10, 1980 Mr. David Spitz, City Planner City Hall 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Spitz: In response to your request, I have estimated the peak hour traffic generation for individual uses (old and proposed) at the Juster Associates shopping center on Route 7. As I explained to you on the phone, traffic generation rate for specific types of retail uses is best determined by utilizing a generation figure for the closest type of use (in terms of user characteristics) contained in the I.T.E. Manual Trip Generation (Rev. 1979). This is the technique employed by the Vermont Agency of Transportation, Accordingly, I have assigned a generation value to each of the former and proposed uses based on a closest land use value. All figures are for the peak hour and include entering and exiting trips. Former Trip Generation -Card & Stationary Store (3,200 ft. 2) 3.2 X T G.L.A. -Bakery/Restaurant 15.5 = T Derived from small shopping center value as typical of free- standing r�tail. (1,600 ft. ) 1.6 X 22.2 = T T G.L.A. Use characteristics similar to high turn- over restaurant. 49.6 35.52 85 (rounded) It Total peak hour trips. North Springfield, Vermont05150 Montpelier, Vermont 05602 Portland, Maine 04103 Manchester Center, Vermont 05255 New London, New Hampshire 03257 Concord, Massachusetts 01742 St. Johnsbury, Vermont 05819 Manchester, New Hampshire 03103 . C Mr. David Spitz September 10, 1980 Page Two Proposed Trip Generation -Drug Store (6,000 ft. 2) 6.0 x 15.7 T P G.L.A. Use characteristics similar to super- market. 94 (rounded) T Total peak hour trips. On this basis, the new use would be expected to generate 9 additional vehicle trips during the peak hour. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. We would appreciate learning of your decision on this matter as soon as possible. Sincerely, DUFRESNE-HENRY, INCORPORATED ��Clv Z� �124� Douglas J. Kennedy Senior Planner DJK/rf c c.c. John Dell'Anno September 3, 1980 i Douglas J. Kennedy, Senior Planner Dufresne -Henry, Inc. Montpelier, Vermont 05602 Dear Mr. Kennedy, The City of South Burlington's Law ercial zoning regulations do not treat uses within a shopping center as equivalent. Different generation rates have been calculated for such uses as drug stores and grocery stores. These two uses, for example, are permitted in Cl zones only within PCUs (Plannea Commercial Developments). This shopping center may qualify as a PCD, but our D regulations require information on existing traffic conditions as well as on in- creased traffic. You must either specify the proposed uses to see whether they are permitted in our Cl zone or you must submit additional ttaff.i.c data for a PCD prpposal. V '- I will be happy to discuss the requirementso�n our regulations with you. U` Sincerely, I David h. Spitz, City Planner DS/mcg T Lil LD T TN T[7 TT I, William E. Wood, of Scarborough in the County of Cumberland and State of Maine, the Vice President and General Manager of Wellby Super Drug Stores, a subsidiary of Hannaford Bros. Co., of South Portland, do hereby depose and say: Justgold Properties of New York and Hannaford Bros. Co., d/b/a Wellby Super Drug Stores, have reached agreement for the lease of certain premises at the K mart - Martin's Shopping Center on Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont for use as a drug store. It is my understanding that the South Burlington Planning Commission has placed a certain restriction on conversion of the present space for use as a drug store, namely, a side entrance, that Hannaford Bros. Co. finds unacceptable as: 1. From past experience, we believe that a corner entrance confuses customers entering the shopping center, as they tend to assume our store front is an extension of the Discount Department Store's. 2. A side entrance does not allow the drug store a normal traffic pattern for customers visiting tenants to the north of the proposed drug store location. 3. A side entrance eliminates valuable display space within the premises. 4. A side entrance is not part of the prototype Wellby Super Drug Store layout plan as utilized in many previous Wellby Drug Stores. Page 2 AFFIDAVIT 5. In the event the Planning Commission does not allow the construction of our prototype store which provides for a front entrance, we will be unable to execute our lease with Justgold Properties. Dated: l i/zi 190 STATE OF MAINE Cumberland County Wood William E. November 19, 1980 There personally appeared the above -named William E. Wood, and swore that the statements given herein are true. Before me, Christopher X. Soles Justice of The Peace Dufresne -Henry, Inc. Engineering Disciplines Associaled Disciplines N1dnyreel Civil F'aw,"r R.IPt n,O,.t , , N�•�. Lwd'Dr, IJ,.rwH:rrn;; hire03257 Enviturimcnlal L,r1,f`- ,r;K Arrt 603 526 6914 Transportalion Survey1ng Municipal Construe 1,,, Y..r , : i.. ,. Mountain Applied Sciences Structural Water o'.lahly Eiectncai Geologic Mechanical Hydrologic Industrial Computer August 26, 1980 ?sir. David Spitz, City Planner City of South Burlington 1175 Williston Road Burlington, VT 05041 Dear Mr. Spitz: John Dell'Anno of Juster Associates has asked me to write to you regarding the traffic related impacts of a change in use for part of his shopping center off Route 7 in Burlington, Specifically, I will address myself to the expected change in traffic generation rate as a result of the change in use. Because a shopping center is an integrated group of commercial establishments that attracts vehicular trips to a number of commercial operations, traffic generation is based on gross square feet of leasable space, regardless of individual uses contained in the center. The following figures are "Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends for the Peak Hour of the Generator" as taken from Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Revised 1979 . TRAFFIC GENERATION (FOR SHOPPING CENTER) Before Use Change 96., 346 ft . 2 x 9.1 = 877 T T GLA Peak Hour Generation Rate (Exits and Entrances) Per 1000 Ft.? GLA The Vermont Agency of Transportation utilizes this publi- cation for projecting traffic generation rates. North Spring'reld. Vemtont 05150 Montpelier, Vermont 05602 Portland. Mane 0e103 Man^hester Center. Wrnml05255 New London, New Hampshire 03257 Concord. Massachusetts 01742 St Johnsbury, Vermont 05819 Manchester, New Hampshire 03103 Mr. David Spitz August 26, 1980 Page Two After Use Change 97,►►546 ft . 2 X 9.1 = 888 GLttA Rate Based on this analysis, the proposed use change would result in the additional generation of 11 vehicles (including exiting and entering) during the peak hour. This would appear to be a very insignificant increase which would not negatively effect adjacent traffic systems. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, DUFRESNE-HENR INCORPORATED Douglas J. Kennedy Senior Planner DJK/rfc c.c. John Dell'Anno a4 C Dufresne -Henry, Inc. Engineering Disciplines Associated Disciplines Main Street Civil piannmg R Urt.,r" Ch ..:'r)t 'r111 New London, New Hampshire 03257 Envi'onmerdai Lawv al,e Archder tine 003 526 6924 Tran,;r;,rtal.or, Surveying Muru.ipal Con;R icl,an!1.ena a•.:' . ^r' Mountain Applied Sciences Structural Water ouality Electrical Geologic Mechanical Hydrologic Industrial Computer September 10, 1980 Iir. David Spitz, City Planner City Hall 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Spitz: In response to your request, I have estimated the peak hour traffic generation for individual uses (old and proposed) at the Juster Associates shopping center on Route 7. As I explained to you on the phone, traffic generation rate for specific types of retail uses is best determined by utilizing a generation figure for the closest type of use (in terms of user characteristics) contained in the I.T.E. Illanual Trip Generation (Rev. 1979). This is the technique employed by the Vermont Agency of Transportation. Accordingly, I have assigned a generation value to each of the former and proposed uses based on a closest land use value. All figures are for the peak hour and include entering and exiting trips. Former Trip Generation -Card & Stationary Store (3,200 ft. 2) 3.2 X r G.L.A. -Bakery/Restaurant 15.5 = T Derived from small shopping center value as typical of free- standing r�tail. (1,600 ft. ) 1.6 X 22.2 = r _r G.L.A. Use characteristics similar to high turn- over restaurant. 49.6 35.52 85 (rounded) It Total peak hour trips. N—Spnnglreld Vemioni05150 Montpelier, VemKxY.. 056M Portland. Mane 04103 Man�n nchesterCenter Ve�nl05255 New London, New Hampshire 03257 Concord. Massachusetts 01742 S1 Johnsbury Vermont05819 Manchester, New Hampshire 03103 Mr. David Spitz September 10, 1980 Page Two Proposed Trip Generation -Drug Store (6,000 ft. 2) 6.0 x 15.7 T T G.L.A. Use characteristics similar to super- market. 94 (rounded) T Total peak hour trips. On this basis, the new use would be expected to generate 9 additional vehicle trips during the peak hour. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. We would appreciate learning of your decision on this matter as soon as possible. Sincerely, DUFRESNE-HENRY, INCORPORATED Douglas J. Kennedy Senior Planner DJK/rfc c.c. John Dell'Anno Juster Associates 1304 Midland Avenue Yonkers, New York 10704 October 6, 1980 Mr. David Spitz, City Planner City of South Burlington 1175 Williston Road Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Sir. Spitz: I am writing to you in reference to the Burlington Shopping Center located in South Burlington, VT owned by Juster Associates of 1304 Midland Avenue, Yonkers, NY. I am requesting that a conversion of Fifth Avenue Cards and The Bakery located between the K-Mart Store and the Martin Food Store be con- verted to Wellby Super Drug Store. Wellby Drug consists of 5,983 square feet as a total area. The original Fifth Avenue Cards was 80' x 401, consisting of 3,2.00 square feet and The Bakery was 80' x 20' consisting of 1,600 square feet. In front of both stores there is an enclosed walkway of 201. I am requesting that the existing enclosed walkway combined with the two stores be a part of the Wellby Drug Store which will have an in and out entrance located at the existing front line of the enclosed walkway. We will attend the October 14th hearing to discuss more in detail the pro- posed plans for the Wellby Drug Store. Sincerely, John Dell'Anno Juster Associates CC: Juster Associates 1304 Midland Avenue Yonkers, NY 10704 Mr:_.Douglas J. Kennedy Dufrene & Henry, Inc. Main Street New London, NH 03257 C�SOU 39ac� 4C=UCl �fCvG�CU 32 N n (� � T= Rom, 91ha,N ro _ Z °% 8M _ 2J � Rio) - -uN 1<- Maw �oCr. 3so S�J `9 N 2'Q' iI� p;� � �Nn l oa c3re wo G `,1 � p k. vJ �,• 0 UL.. 3t0� `! V U N ^ /1 CJ 1^ N�n�N >b'gfwNZ Our-o In n rJ ' v �N a 000 /9 0 7- .o s0 vv� = 19-78 ; <-►ems � uI'���';� ��%���:� l L' n r 1 A SHOPPING CENTER PARKING LOT DRIVE-IN BANK 35-0 315- f u i T - �S / IO Y 135- 16 0 �- 1350 f-- 1560 / 430--), / 2`to--) �c-. 75" 30 —zv / It/0 .ALLEN S S25 295 PUB j 3 S_ A C M R1 Z T c� -� 35 MS T L160 l80 D 460 / SO I T 2 15 245 �- 18 O f-15 70 F- 1310 353 317 T 27 j Y 160 2 F-- 61--� 1131 30 ----y PARKING LOT DRIVE-IN BANK `136 < —1350 f--1561 rc---- 75 527 296 T 172 35s i I 207 ' AD 25 7-- a 06 --� 35- APT. BLDG. 180 a t� C y62 i 2/6 2`16 6 0 7 F--� K-- J8 0 E-157! i F—i391 13 3 6 4 vim. -- CIieM No. Oi 3 TPrcI. Mgr- D J _.._ . +w _/. door Pl4r7 for C enfrai igortjr ," of 5hoppi C ew, ef, Fromm Totx Records. oposed pr � Slot 0 a IQ 10/o/so 0.Ys. Dufresne -Henry, Inc. Main Street New London, New Hampshire 03257 603-526-6924 Engineering Disciplines Civil Environmental Transportation Municipal Mountain Structural Electrical Mechanical Industrial August 26, 1980 Mr. Richard Warden Zoning Administration and Code Enforcement City Hall Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Warden: Associated Disciplines Planning & Urban Development Landscape Architecture Surveying Construction Management Applied Sciences Water Quality Geologic Hydrologic Computer John Dell'Anno of Juster Associates has asked me to write to you regarding the traffic related impacts of a change in use for part of his shopping center off Route 7 in Burlington. Specifically, I will address myself to the expected change in traffic generation rate as a result of the change in use. Because a shopping center is an integrated group of commercial establishments that attracts vehicular trips to a number of commercial operations, traffic generation is based on gross square feet of leasable space, regardless of individual uses contained in the center. The following figures are "Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends for the Peak Hour of the Generator" as taken from Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Revised 1979 . TRAFFIC GENERATION (FOR SHOPPING CENTER) Before Use Change 96,346 ft.2 X 9.1 = 877 + I. GLA Peak Hour Generation Rate (Exits and Entrances) Per 1000 Ft.2 GLA The Vermont Agency of Transportation utilizes this publi- cation for projecting traffic generation rates. North Springfield, Vermont05150 Montpelier, Vermont 05602 Portland, Maine 04103 Manchester Center, Vermont 05255 New London, New Hampshire 03257 Concord, Massachusetts 01742 St. Johnsbury, Vermont 05819 Manchester, New Hampshire 03103 Mr. John Warden August 26, 1980 Page Two After Use Change 97,546 ft.2 X 9.1 = 888 GLA Rate Based on this analysis, the proposed use change would result in the additional generation of 11 vehicles (including exiting and entering) during the peak hour. This would appear to be a very insignificant increase which would not negatively effect adjacent traffic systems. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, DUFRESNE-HENR INCORPORATED Douglas J. Kennedy Senior Planner DJK/rfc c.c. John Dell'Anno ,qk-��t 4j,,&Vj- - 'Al" • ' M f r IMPACT ANALYSIS SHELBURNE ROAD - JUSTER SHOPPING CENTER SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT P s lMETHOD OF ANALYSIS This Analysis was conducted in the following manner: 1. The geometric configuration and pertinent dimen- sions were taken from available mapping at the Vermont Agency of Transportation and from actual on site inspection. 2. Traffic volumes were obta3_ned for the study intersections. The base volumes were 1978 peak hour volumes developed by the Vermont Agency of Transportation. These volumes were factored to reflect an estimated 6o per year growth to the year 1980. 3. The present signalization phasing was utilized to determine sub -approaches. Each approach receiv- ing a separate signal phase or separate time in- terval was assigned a sub -approach number. A level of service for the estimated 1980 peak hour volume on that sub -approach was calculated assum- ing the signal phasing & interval sequence would not be revised from what it presently is during peak periods of the day. 4. The level of service was calculated using methods set forth in the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, Highway Research Board Special Report 87 CALCULATIONS OF ANALYSIS The following calculations reflect the analysis in accordance with the method previously discussed. It should be noted here that the signals at U.S. Rt. .7 (Shelburne Rd.), Brewer Parkway & Shopping Center Drive represent one intersection where as the signals at Rt. 7 and Lindenwood Drive are interconnected with the signals at Rt. 7 and Queen City Park so that the two intersections are treated as one "dog -leg type" intersection. These calculations are based on information shown on the plan sheets and on the traffic signal sequence sheets. INTERSECTION A (U.S 7) Shelburne Rd. at Brewer Pkwy & Shopping Center Given- North -South (U.S. 7); two way street, no parking crossing east -west Brewer Pkwy and Shopping Center Drive with no parking; widths and -approaches indi- cated on plan sheet 1 of 3. 1 ' Outlying Business District*= 1.25 Factor Metro area population= 75,000+*= 0.92 Factor Peak Hour Factor= 0.85* assumed -no adjustment Factor J Signal cycle= 90 sec. - 3 phase Green Time - refer to plan & traffic signal sequence sheet - use Dial No. 2 JTrucks= 5% all approaches*= 1.0 Factor Local Buses= 0%* - no adjustment Factor IPeak demand volumes as per plan 1 Turns as indicated on plan Determine - Load factor & intersection level of service with exist- ing geometry & traffic signalization Sub Approach #(1)- U.S. 7 Northbound - 2 lanes thru with 2% Rt. Turns - 1.04 factor -& 0% left turns this case= 1.10 Factor G/C ratio= 56.5/90= 0.628 Dem. vo1.= 1285 VPH From Fig. 6.8, pg. 136 Highway Cap. Manual for 24, I wide approach, Table 6.4 & 6.5 Rt'. & left= 1.040 & 1.10 1 2150 vphg x 0.92x1.25x0.628xl.04x1.10= 1776 VPH@LF 1.0(E) Service vol.= 1950 vphgx0.92xl.25x0.628xl.04x1.10= 1611 VPH @ LF 0.7 (D)= 1700 vphgx0.92xl.25x0.628x1.04xl.lo= 1405 VPH @ LF 0.3 C+ Level Sub Approach #(2)- U.S. 7 Northbound - 1 Left turn lane G/C ratio= 18/90= 0.200 No opposing traffic 0% Rt=, 1.2 I 1 - _ Demand vol.= 162 VPH 0% Lt= 1.3 Service vol. for sep. turn per hr.= 800 for 10' lane.'.960 vphg for 12' lane --page 139 Service vol. 960xo.92xl.25xo.200xl.2xl.3= 345 VPH Level of Service A Total N. Bd. Demand= 1447 w/Total SV.= 1750 VPH @ Level C+ Sub Approach # (3)- U.S. 7 Southbound- 2 lanes thru plus I(1366+137= 1503) Sep. Rt. Turn lane no sep. signal G/C ratio= 49.5/90 = 0.55 0% Rt= 1.05 J0% Lt= 1.10 a) Demand vol. = 1366 vph thru traffic only From Fig. 6.8 pg. 136 Highway Cap. Manual for 24' wide approach. Service Vol.= 1950 vphgx0.92xl.25x.55x1.05x1.10= 1425 @ LF 0.7 (D) Service Vol.= 1700 vphx0.92xl.25x0.55x1.05xl.10= 1242 @ LF 0.3 (C) Because Rt. turn lane cannot be used by any thru vehicles, the thru lanes are critical -sub approach #3 at Level of Service D+ I b) Demand vol. 137 Rt. Turn only - same G/C J Service Vol.= 96ox.92xl.25x.55xl.05x1.10= 701 VPH Level of Service A ISub Approach #(4)- U.S. 7 Southbound - Left turn lane w/ no opposing traffic - 0% Rt.= 1.2 0% Lt= 1.3 I G/C ratio= 11/90 = 0.122 1 Demand Vol. = 76 VPH .Service Vol. (see pg. 139 Highway Cap. Manual) JService Vol.= 960xo.92xl.25x0.122xl.2x1.3= 210 VPH Level of Service A Sub Approach #(5)— Brewer Parkway- Westbound 1 lane with 58% Rt-Factor 0.85 and 24% Lt- Factor. 0.83 a) G/C ratio= 12/90 = 0.133 (Dial #2) Demand vol = 106 VPH From Fig 6.8 for 10' approach Service vol.= 650xO.92xl.25xO.l33xO.85xO.83= 70 VPH @ LF 0.3 (C) Service vo1.= 800x0.92x625x0.33x0.85x0.83= 86 VPH @ LF 0.7 (D) ,SV= 900xO.92xl.25xO.l33xO.85xO.83= 97 VPH @ LF 1.0 (E) During Peak Hr. when signal set on Dial 2 this leg operates close to Level of Service E b) G/C ratio = 11/75 = .147 (Dial #1) 1 SV= 800xo.92xl.25x.147x.85x.83= 95 VPH @ 0.7 (D) SV= 900xO.92xl.25x.147x.85x.83= 107 VPH @ 1.0 (E) It appears that -this leg would operate between D & E level of service if present signalization remains un- changed. Sub Approach #(6)— Shopping Center Drive Eastbound 1 lane- thru & left only 0% Rt= 1.20 30+% LT= 0.80 G/C ratio= 12/90= .133 Demand vol. = 126 VPH From Fig 6.8 for 11' width S.V.= 700 x 0.92 x 1.25 x 0.133 x 1.20 x .80= 103-VPH @ LF.3 (C) S.V.= 800 x 0.92 x 1.25 x 0.133 x 1.20 x .80= 117 VPH @'LF.7 (D) S.V.= 900 x 0.92 x 1.25 x 0.133 x 1.20 x .80= 132 VPH @ LF1.0(E) Sub Approach 6 operates between Level D and E at peak hrs. - dial #2 Sub Approach #(7)- Shopping Center Drive.Eastbound- 1 lane - Rt. Turn only Sep. signal - no opposing traffic no Rt. Turns this case= 1.2 Factor 0% Lt Turns= 1.3 Factor G/C Ratio = 33.5/90 = 0.372 Demand Vol = 228 VPH S.V. see pg. 139 Hwy Cap. Manual (800 x 1.1 = 880 vphg) S.V.= 880 x 0.92 x 1.25 x .372 x 1.2 x 1.3 = 587 VPH 228< 587.'. - Level of Service A D - IINTERSECTION B (U.S 7) Shelburne Rd. at Lindenwood Drive & Queen City Park Rd Given- North -South (U.S. 7); two way street, no parking, dog leg crossing east -west Lindenwood Dr. and Queen I City Park Road with no parking; widths and ap- proaches indicated on plan sheet 2 of 3 Outlying Business District*= 1.25-Factor IMetro. Area population 75,000+.*= 0.92 Factor Peak Hr. Factor= 0.85* assumed- no adjustment factor Signal Cycle= 90 sec. - 3 phase Green Time - refer to plan & traffic signal Isequence sheet - use Dial No. 2 Trucks = 5% all approaches*= 1.0 Factor Local Buses= 0%* - no adjustment Factor Peak demand volumes as per plan Turns as indicated on plan Determine - Load Factor & intersection level of service with exist- ing geometry & traffic signalization Sub Approach #(.1)- U.S. 7 Northbound - 2 lanes thru - 1% Rt. Turns, 1.045 Factor & 0% Lt. Turns, 1.10 Factor G/C ratio 58.5/90 = 0.65 Demand Vol.= 1351 VPH From Fig. 6.8 pg. 136 Hwy Cap. Manual for 24, wide approach Service Vol. 1700 x phg x 0.92 x 1.25 x 0.65 x 1.045 x 1.1= 1461 VPH @ LF 0.3 1351 < 1461:. Level of Service C+ Sub Approach #(2)=U.S.7 Southbound at Lindenwood Dr. Thru Traffic - no stop required i i al DutrosrmeNenrY - 1 Sub Approach #(3)- U.S. 7 = 1 Left Turn lane @ Lindenwood no opposing.7.0% Rt-.. = 1.2 & 0% Lt. = 1.3 IG/C ratio = 9/90-= 0.10 Demand volume = 10 VPH I Service vol. for sep. turn (signal) page 139 - 800 x 12/10 1 = 960 Service vol. 960 x 0.92 x 1.25 x 0.10 x 1.2 x 1.3= 172 VPH Level of Service A Sub Approach #(4.) Lindenwood- Westbound 1 lane with 50% Rt- 0.85 Factor, 50% Lt = 0.80 G/C ratio = 13.5/90= 0.15 Demand volume = 20 VPH From Fie-.6.8 pg. 136, Hwy Cap.Manual, for 101} wide approach Service Vol. 700 x 0.92 x 1.25 x 0.15 x 0.85 x 0.80= 82 VPH @ 0. 3 (C ) Level of Service = A Sub Approach #(5) U.S. 7 Northbound - 2 lanes thru with 0% Rt - 1.050 & 0% Lt - 1.10 Factor G/C ratio = 63/90 = 0.70 Demand Vol = 1351 From Fig 6.8, pg. 135, Hwy Cap. Manual, for 24' wide approach Service Volume = 1700 vphg x 0.92 x 1.25 x 0.7 x 1.05 x 1.1 I= 1581 VPH 1351---- 1581 :. Level of Service = C+ Sub Approach #(61- U.S. 7 Southbound - 2 lanes with 11% Rt. Turns, 0.995 & 0% Lt. Turns, 1.10 Factor G/C Ratio = 58.5/90 = 0.65 Demand Vol. = 1589 VPH From Fig. 6.8 Hwy Capacity Manual for 24, wide approach Service Vol. = 1700 vphg x 0.92 x 1.25 x 0.65 x 0.995 x 1.1 1391 VPH at 0.3 (C) Service Vol. = 1950 vphg x 0.92 x 1.25 x 0.65 x 0.995 x 1.1 1595 VPH at 0.7 (D) 1589< 1595 Level of Service = D+ Sub Approach #7 - Queen City Park Rd - Eastbound - 1 left turn lane - 0% Rt. Turns thru case, 1.20 0% Lt. Turn in this case, 1.30 Factor G/C Ratio = 18/90 = 0.20 Demand Vol. = 248 VPH Service vol. for sep. turn (signal) pg. 139 - 800 x 11/1.0 = 88o Service vol. 880 x 0.92 x 1.25 x 0.20 x 1.2 x 1.3 = 316 VPH 248< 316 . Level of Service B Sub Approach #8 - Queen City Park Rd. - Eastbound - 1 Right Turn Lane - 0% Rt. Turns this case, 1.20 % Lt Turns in this case, 1.30 Factor_ G/C Ratio = 13.5/90 = 0.15 Demand Vol. = 218 Service vol. for sep, turn lane (signals pg. 139 = 800 x 12/10 = 960 Service vol. 960 x 0.92 x 1,25 x 0.15 x 1.20 x 1.30 = 258 VPH 218 < 258 Level of Service C+ 66rlmn ton p/a-zq e n7e r CONCLUSIONS Intersection A Intersection A, U.S. 7 at Brewer Parkway, has a good level of service, level of service C or better, with the following exceptions. Sub Approach #3, (U.S. 7 southbound•thru lanes at Brewer Parkway) has a level of service just a little better than level D. Additional traffic attributed to any expan- sion at the Shopping Ctr. would not show up on this approach so would not affect this level of service. Sub Approach #5, (Brewer Parkway westbound) has a re- latively poor level of service, between levels D & E, as presently signalized for peak hour traffic. Sub Approach #6,•(Shopping Ctr. Drive eastbound through and left turn lane only) operates at a relatively poor level of -service, between level D & E, as presently signalized for peak hour traffic. Increased traffic caused by addition to the shopping center could Jeopardize this move if the volume were significant. However much of this left turn traffic could exit via Queen City Park Road left turn which has a high level of service. I Intersection B Intersection B, U.S. 7 at Lindenwood Drive and U.S. 7 at Queen City Park Road, has a good level of service, level C or better, with the following exception. Sub approach #6, (U.S. 7 southbound at Queen City Park Road) has a level of service at D level. Additional traf- fic from Burlington or I-89 destined for any expanded faci- lities at the Shopping Center would adversely affect this move. The number of added vehicles required to worsen the level of service significantly is rather small. This parti- cular move however is further hampered by the built in weaving section of short length which tends to reduce the efficiency of this leg. � I ":m a,-== APPENDIX NOTES: 1• (000) - 1980 PEAK HR.-TRAFFIC VOLS. DERIVED FROM 1978 V.A.T. TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH 6V YR. EXPANSION FACTOR. 2. ALL LANES 12' WIDE UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 3. SUB -APPROACH NUMBER -Q PETCO GAS 0 457 1 uJ r_ M w Z w U c� Z a 0 22' ti -► 5 `. 4S9 (683) U . S . ROUTE 7 ® ( 162}---}' 3 Q ( ( 6 4 3) 9 HEET I OF 3 m 462 NOTES: I. (000)= 1980 PEAK HR. TRAFFIC VOLS. DERIVVED FROM 1978 V.A.T. TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH 6/YR. EXPANSION FACTOR. 2. ALL LANES 12' WIDE UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 3. SUB -APPROACH NUMBER ID U.S. ROUTE 7 (675) --�- 0 10) NO LEFT TURNS INTERSECTION B PLAN SCALE: I"=401+ SHOPPING CENTER )RIVE z W w d (808465 �� 6 [ ( 182 Q612+ ►2 I (807)795 r— -9 7\-- -- 1 (675) _� 5 4 I © (676) 5 w � 0 z 9�t J TRAFFIC SIGNALS/ SPANWIRE SHEET 2 OF 3 TRAFFIC SIGNALS/ SPANWIRE No Text NOTE: ' Signals on Shelburne Road, South Burlington, operate on IDial No. 1 from 6:30 AM to 3:30 PM and 6:00 to 10:30 PM, Monday thru Friday, and 6:30 AM to 10:30 PM Saturdays; on Dial No. 2 from 3:30 to 6:00 PM, Monday thru Friday; and in flashing mode at all other times. i h �e-wp/s /► z� 3 f �� S f 6 7 8 I CFF�/s r%io/ c5. 3- 4 13 4s 15 4 151 4 I 49'/z � 31/ I 3 %z 4 i l 3 ! 4 i /2 4 4 i T I Y R R R R R R R R R R R i ! l- i 5he/6,�,,r•7e d oOL ae-c,7 Cpork /Qeod- ,Cii��Pizacrr�Ol: V2 /z ' Z/ '/z PrcPa S8 + 6 6 i se cs. I � S 7 ! 4 '/z i 4 �z Yz 4 //L i 41, r 60 i 8o 4G e 4/es. I 3 R R f Y R R I R ' ` R