HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-80-0000 - Decision - 0935 0937 Shelburne Road2.
• PLAI ;IhG C-11---I"SION
1=227R 14, 196
Mr. 'Iona moved that on the drawinp entitled Preli-irarr :jet, Stonehe -e
South Burlinz,ton, last revised 3 12 79, the co--riection between the S;;uth ends
of the 2 access roads of Cluster E be designated as an area to be kept free of
obstructions, and that that be noted on the plan_ of record. Leveso_ue seconded
the motion and all voted in favor.
Arnlication by BDP Realty Association.}for site plan an::roval of a 4,500 -square
foot addition io an existing of=ice bs;ldinF at 1533 S-elburne :cad
Gordon roods acted t at last year BD_' had Constructed a building next
to Nordic Ford and that they now wz_nt tc sdd zn addition 6C' E:' kith the sa=e
tyre construction and architecture. BD: will use t o addition. 35 more parking
s:.aces will be added along t e side of t-. e building, and more 1ardsca inE, will be
yrov ided.
:•_r. Spitz said Vhis was an office use, w ich is emitted in that area.
Kr. Ewing warned `:r. *roods that if they wanted to use the lend in front of
the building in the future, they -izhl. need subdivision ar: royal and 1:r. Po-er
added that the Cl/Cr' zoning might cause some Problems at a later date.
rr. Spitz said parking seemed'to be more than adequate.
Xr. ywinE -owed that the South Eurlin,.ton Pla_nninf- Ccm--ission &:*-rove the
site clan az)licatio^ cf BD= ,ezlty Association for a 4,cC: souare feat addition
to an existing officebbuildin; at 1502,5helburne rood, ass A-e::icted cn s Mar.
riI'. ♦ - s • 1 E. 1 -.
entitled yew Addition to exis�m�- Office Bui_ci:.E, srl'n�tc.. Data 17ocessi^L",
pre-jared by Gordon G. Hoods AssociateE and d-ted 9,12/80, su.-4ect tc the fc:lowing
sti ;�ulstions:
1. The narking lot must be rreded, and t::at Eradi noted Ln the pl&n of
record, so that storm vater wi not cram on o : e adjacent zrz::Ptr y.
2. The final site plan shall indicate ..tti:e location of five additional Noru
Maples to be relocated from the ;roposed new"FerkinE area.
3. A landscaping bond of ;;3,000 shall be provided.
4. This approval expires 6 months from this date.
The motion was seconded by ;lr.
Kr. woods said there was a swele in the middle of the new parking lot, with
a 6" drop in the -center.
the motion carried unanimously.
Apr lication by Juster Associates for &7:.rovel -of a conversion and ex;:&nsion of a
Previous b=kEr_y crd card rho-n to E itiellb-, D:.:f :.t^re In the she—, 7in;- center cn
::E1L::r:.e Road south of I -log
i.T. DcuE, l:en::edy --aid' the r£O:]e=t w2z tC ccnvGrt a cL-ra ;tore cf j2C✓ so.
ft. and a bF=:ery of 16C2 sc. ft., as well as t:.e exintinE E:.cic_,;E3 si3ewF:t: area
in front of bLt} s:crez, into & :e12by :':.:E :Aare.
The Cc—iscio : vaz co :cerncd a: cut ts:e safe .r of _ ec< an:! if' tie ru. -SE"
_lam were f :iiowed. d_'_e' did want annt Er c` it w n:C.'. zJ.1cE'-I_ E CG: to
arcs: :- .:�:.=C�•_L� trS 2C, E— tar S:._e d1CC..__=..., t^E: C._LEC:C� t :9t t:.0
fr:..:�5CI d-.,. ���f. i•r� Cf t:.E L:..i:_�L e E.___: rt0'. �:. :..fit t . E-.try:.Ce t0
..
:-he _:-eze..t _i 11 fr;,_ __C t..0 '_Ttl. %-::12 _f
::ellby Dr.:EE czntai- a door. ._ . Dell'i=Ao t__.. ' = d:3 ::ct ._.bti it ___s wcula Lc
c = a: i[=, . J: :..a _ _.E C;...1C ....E C.. it. L-Ut.
3.
FL:_iii ?i\y CC:•_ ,ISSICN
'CT'-'BER 14 • 198C
i�ir. Kennedy said he had sent 2 letters to the Planner discussinE what he
projected in additional traffic movements from the change in use. Using trip
generation figures from ITE he has determined that there will be 9 more total
vehicle trips. This is less than lh and does not seem to have any functional
effect on the intersections, he said.
Kr. Levesque felt the esthetics of the area would be improved if the parking
lot were szaller. Screening the lot from Shelburne Road was discussed.
',:r. :alsh found it hard to accept the trip generation figures, feeling that
converting an unsucessful card shop to a erellby's would not be &miner traffic
change. ::r. Mona felt that the approaches to the mall did not seer to have any
problems, noting that he never had to gait for 2 liE::t cycles.
':r. Ewing 4sked about an easement to the rear of the Tire "r'arehcuse and the
motel on S::elburLe Road, notinE that it did riot have to be Fut in place new, but
if one of the uses on Sh elburne Road changed, there wc;:ld be the option to have
traffic enter it from the barking lot instead of Shelburne Ecad.
Mr. Spitz noted that the drug store was not a 7crmitted use unless it were
in a PCD. He said this lot met the acreage and lot frzntaf-e requirements, but
he did not know about the level of service at the nearest siErallized intersecticne.
He felt the increase was minor, but under a strict interpretation of the ordinance,
they were discussing a PCD. He felt the Commission had to designate the irtersections
it warted studied. Xr. Poger warted to enforce the ordinance as strictly as
'possible, notinE that this was the first such application to co=e to the Co=issicn.
He said the intersections in ouestion were Brewer Parkway and the main entrance
and Queen City Park and Shelburne Roads.
Obtaining actual traffic counts to determine level of service was discussed,
but .r. Spitz felt that the figures from 1978 could be updated and provide
accurate figures.
Ix. Kennedy noted that it was an involved process to deter--ine level of service.
rr. ,'•:ona felt this was an existing PCD and that the only question before
the Commission was the use.
Mr. Levesque agreed with Xr. I•:ona, but Messrs. Ewing and ',Walsh agreed with
Xr. PoEer, and it was decided to apply the FCD criteria. %r. Ewing stated that
he hated to do it for such a small change.
Mr. Spitz noted that using the enclosed sidewalk area was what caused the
traffic increase over what is there now. He added that because this was a minor
change, the Commission could designate this a PCD and then waive some of the
criteria, but he was not sure he would recommend that. Mr. Poger wanted to
determine the levels of service before the Co=ission used any waiver powers. Yr.
i:ona did not agree. i'r. PoEer was willing to use the 197E figures and have them
updated instead of requiring a new count.
Mr. ::ona proposed granting approval but tequiring the developer to measure
the level of service. If it turned out to be D, not C, the Co=ission would use
that fact to retract approval.
Mr. Dell'1•.nno said he was under a time limit here and had to have approval
by i:ove_,er 1. hp.rzval ti.ith a sti.-ulation that the level of service be C or
better w;s zentio: cd. ::r. Spitz noted that it s4ve ec::.e time if they couldCive t :e traffic is study to City Ball instead of time :.c._ inzion.
T:ice C.=ission studied the PCID stand--res. '•:r. loner di� nct feel that the
frOLt =-e rE jrrEreni £fiCuld be Let with frc tL�-e or. tv o viiely scj _ra ed Strpetr,
tlt::,u:-h .'.e d4d nGt oG`ect to wb1Vi..j; '.!.at iL' �:.'_." caze. : e .!.�". .not fuel that
een the intent of t''Le Co— w.:en ...e Eta.ndZirdS :.E•TE vr_:tEn, _::;t
:since :Ir. ..eves mime ;:.minted out t :Fat t..e crdinance did nc t s ec_`':csll;7 that
•
iS. t'o: er as-ed ::r. Spitz tL s::L_'est a cranL E i L wording OL It VaS
noted that in this case th.c 5W frcrts_e on '-:leer. City Park Oaa ='Ae a E,reat
difference iL tLe traffic flow _ere.
4.
PI:xI•;:SING CC?•2•:ISSI0;1
OCTOBER 14, 1980
Mr. Aiona moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission aP;:rove the
aorlication of Juster Associates for conversion and e:._7anzion of a previous
bakery and card shop to a drug store as described b;; a floor ;Ian entitled
"isellby Super B:ug Store" drawn by Hannaford retail _-ervices, last revised
abject to the following stirulations:
1. trDlicant will move entrance location fro= east side to existent door
on so:;t"k Zide.
2. Site clam, complete with existent structure and improvements (and
a-.zzoved 'tv City Planner) must be submitted cricr to iszuance of a building
,:;er=it
3. A landscaping bond of 3' of the value of the building im^.roverents shell
be ;posted.
4. A tr..ffic stud•/retort indicating levels of service at intersections of
Shelburne Road and Brewer : arkway and Shelburne Road and Queer. City Park Road will
be rrovided prior to issuance of building permits. If the level of service is
found to be worse than. "C" then future i=prove=ent to tRis PCJ must address the
condition before approval
5. This ar p•rcval ex-pires in 6 =onths.
Mr. Levesque seconded the motion.
J:r. ::ona was asked what would hap; -,en if the level of service turned out to
be y and he indicated that it would be too late to retract arprcval and they
would still be issued a permit. Xr. Poker wanted to see and consider the traffic
re_:,or t before a decision was made.
T-:r. Kennedy was told that the resort would deal with the intersections
mentioned, but that the Commission wanted to;,see a level of service for each
1 are .
The motion carried with ::essrs. Walsh and Poger voting; no.
Acjlication by Lius Comcany for sketch elan review of a 21 unit condo=irium
urc.iect on 5.2E acres of land owned by Lyery Victory on .1illiston Road
:r. Spitz explained that Mr. Victory was selling 5.26 acres to Xr. Liu and
that ancther small parcel would be sold to NCE. This iE fine if it is attached
to the 11M lot, but it has no road frontage now. ;-:r. Spitz noted that there was
also a 1CO' x 23O' lot which by a court decree in 1974 belonee to ;s. Victory's
son, but the court action does not set forth"where the boundariLz are cn Willistcn
Ro_i. ::r. Spitz did not want to create a lot with incroFer side lines and he added
t1 at no munici ..al approval for the lot had ever been given, so i:e felt it was
subject to the review i�roces.,;.
;:r. 7ictory read nor tioLss of the c.;ur t decree on October E, 11074.
.Xvi: c both side lines cf the 10C' s 230' lot to :hc a_st to ;.ro "e r: c. =r
zide yard .._zez was discussed. :.:r. :•:o na felt the owi.er ff that lot had to
artici-•ate in ar.; decision on ti.ozE !hies and hE urged °:r. Victory to `-et t:::z
=Et:l£d i:Lfcre t:.i Lp_t WEetin...r. _ Offer ased ::T. t2 t� taL•- t- ttE 1-; 4�
%t :r_nc-y :'vL.: thi: lot.
thLt C.2C sore: -,;Ls zor,ed aL any t, t I,' , ^Ol Ozed a �✓
••.: 1 �iav f these i •� -,;nit.- 1 it r�i�
_.. c, ,... � _ c_ ..ewe Will iE tc.. �:cup. ,:ri ., ar.3 � t: a e..�.. � .t ......te
c: t:._ ler.d. a -rc- ze: access fro= reler. Avenue. There is nc cc: rec.ior.
',-Ouse, -e-: cT tap access and the units.
tc :tree:::. L-re .';�:_:E�. .ter. __u reid t---. 1L::. _r. taE f.-Ott LE t:E:. LB