Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-87-0000 - Supplemental - 0760 Shelburne RoadSOUT )UE LINGTON ZONING BOA;?U OF )JUS1 -4.NT Findings in accordance with Section 1+-46P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, Including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 11 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has no-t�—b�Jeen created by the appellant; . (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 1:1 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Z-- Date J i o Appellant C,a 2 J dsCJ n, n, e- Vote: Yes l=� No Q Sign — List findings below: SOUT )3UH LINGTON ZONING BOAi:1) Off: �JUST'u_:N'C Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the .Ilanning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; ff (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; U (3) That such unnecessary hardship has no-t been created by the appellant; i� (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent p operty, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal Date ,� /� i Appellant - lat_ltiz Vote: Yes No Q Sign List findings below: 1. 2. SOU'. )BURLINGTON ZONING BOAi:U U. )DJUSTX-_."N'i "indings In accordance with Section 1+46P of the Planninr, (1, fevelopment Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neig-hborhood or district in which the property is located; j (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 0- (3) That such unnecessary hardship has no-t been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # ; Date I% . 'F 7 Appellant_ 6�" Q0„vnL ,, Vote: Yes No FA Sign vyK.f< NO✓ 3 0 �7 List findings below: `> • Gdi�k✓a THY oL 3. SUIT ) HUELINGTON ZONING BOAT U 0. )JJUS'I'?^.:.NT Findings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning (', Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 11 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (vj (3) That such unnecessary hardship has no-t been created by the appellant; Lr-*J-l. (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and j (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. n Appeal # M'.-1 5 pr7 Date_ / w,/��% Appellant Vote: Yes No Q Sign List findings below: 1. 3 SOU, )3UPLINGTON "ZONING BOAI'D 0!• ))JUSTu:::4'r ?findings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is locate (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; -CJ (-'�j (3) That such unnecessary hardship has n o-tbeen created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of ad acent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan -.-M. Date :�2,za, F i Appellant ti Vote: Yes No i--� List findings beloi 0 Appeal #� G�Z i�`�^✓�+ ^ `� �� l r Sign i ) cti