Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 0520 Shelburne Road (2)
®rtN.E i•uE Wsrx- (HYIN.L NInE W4Tae- e.0eu Ir.az N.AeIT »E•1' AK IHIUM Ir.r' AlII.IMQIM IZAr' rww■1r n.•W r..re.r wz taw O.olo t■arN r.n• IONG olA11D 1141N 1�.1r It Er1eMG er•N'TP'W Ec eEw■.c . _�i •+e•aPw ORluE 4IIelE WITIP E■■Yl w: eew.e w: � a GUNK I�u falflMl •NaIE 1•JW4P ESR•K 4WGtf ruJ1• A11C11wT11 r7.]0' A•eR° 1.•PLr' •.04K 1.r2.r' ryq■I{ EiLN' AIIC IHGIN r.n' A1IC IEN6IN EAaa lAllA ONeo tRar' TAMEiiR Ie.eT rMIAM i6]O NOR: NVeaU. N1IHT �11wAIt CUrvf rT4 ■ rem aN M CNOw1 C6•ErgN. TIr CIwVE MS M lD*S IAO 0oT eN M rEi■lY eIOF Of M iT•FET. b HADEY ROAD R.O.W. L'+ z -- M 70ZY2S• W K.ee' G•Nt VL I LNt 1 I B. BARNEYI T.Nt P. I N� I N& I N& §gym M-4 N� I _ Lp. BROOKS R. t M. F. d[ J. W.0 I I I GRIGGS I BROOKS I M. STARKM I HASKINS I i REDFIELD I KOCHMAN al al= PEARSON I s " $ N/F J & B SNYDER s 7ort25' L— -- s 7ozYz5• [ 70.00' 477.42- — — z I IIkw NWOFE bfs i W I N HOME AVENUE I N 7T2r]O' 47 eo' CURVE DATA PeNe A: WM r: artnK ul°E Wars E+1*••• �• a••aT.eE- A.Aus m.11• Awl° m.e• AK LHIAIH 1M�•' AK Ue.GY11 el.•Y rwcENT nn' T4NG:NY •7.e1' I011A ololo lsenN lu.o' uN+AOwoueclN vs.' LL ef14■f .I■••aTiPW LC rAI■If Nr•al•aPW Is I� N 1r35'0(• E S 7P1Y00• E S 70Z2Y5' E 200.01' 70.00' STRMT S 7W2Y00• E S 70.2Y00• E S 7072'O0• Eri 22,w E $ §� F-1 FF �Ix :I NA CHAMPLAIN O L CO.INC. ~ ^ aA S 7I7'11'40• E • W Se.ee' ]0R2'00• F �� tie.ee• EMSTNG EASEMENT AS [ \ DEFINED BY AGREEAENT MTH ADJOINING LAND OWIER Ic IRREWCABL€€ . THE 1TY OF SOL%M BUAIIr'!G FROM�� MF yFAMFlI COIY. FARRELL 2a I i{ DWp 1 I i � fTVARiI I i TI LEGEND -- EXISTING PROPERTY LINE -- PROPOSED PCD OR R.O.W. LINE — — - — SETBACK LINE — — — — — — — EASEMENT LINE O EXISTING BUILDING ;.a PROPOSED SLIDING o POINT • IRON PIN 0 IRON PIPE v CONCRETE MONUMENT ■ MONUMENT TO BE SET --- LEASE LINE GRAPHIC SCALE ( Drr=T) I /■eb - 50 N. J OCATION MAP SCALE: I- . 1/4 mile -- N 70YY55• W —_ N/F BLVM24GTM DIDOOR TENNIS CENTER. INC CURVE 07: CENTRAL ANGLE 44•.5C-25- RADUS IIL99' ARC LENGTH 0 .8e' twioNw w1H ,�u iNE 1�q°lalarrs ui n s 1.m. M TmE a M wr ■ -ERE NMI•. 6EV■ Y. f4MA 1MO.Nf AlI1111■1 a iMIHl L'OMOIUTpN .IION9RlF5. e0U1M •I.w)4TpE K. eGli 1• . ]P. J•MMNY>0. leas. G.E .K. MAY 10 1993 1 NWR■RY pNI■I N9Nr■RM1M •ND AwSLWr °: pw0 LL A1blLL E eTWRr N eIaCOWIf 1Y. Tle°TFLS co rower outllrrtrc 0 iIAU.Fe eWD eourN uwralaN K City of So. Burlington WEY.wtilYwlE1C A•OTRRa INC. EO f01l1H FYR ONY£ COLpi3lFA VT 00MG CURVE N: CENTRAL ANGLE 45•-00•-00- RADUS 4B.or ARC LENGTH 37.70' 00" OF DRAV*VWS C-1 PROPERTY PLAN C-2 SITE & LANDSCAPING PLAN C-3 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C-4 UTILITY • GRADING PLAN - WEST C-5 UTILITY i GRADING PLAN - EAST C-6 O'DELL PARKWAY - PROFILE 0 CROSS SECTIONS C-7 ROADWAY DETAILS C-8 UTILITY DETAILS C-9 LANDSCAPING t EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C-10 SPECIFICATIONS SE-1 ROADWAY i AREA LIGHTING S 711e'20'E ■0.0Y s IllsO N1*8 §( NIP old STEVENS z 31 �. >rl$JOY DRIVE Flo ol� 31 f72 N/F >r o OLYMPIAD 6 ' COURT ASSOCIATES CURVE ■9: CENTRAL ANGLE 45•-00'-00' RADIUS IOB.Or ARC LENGTH 84.93' I: ^I OLYMPIAD COURT ASSOCIATES GARDENS FOR ALL.'IIC. IFORHATION SHOWN . GROUND SURVEY 'SENSED HAS BEEN )S. OFFICIAL RECORDS. ) INFORMATION OBTAINED )NFORMS WITH ALL THE CC. 1403. j I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I i I I I I I I I I I I I HOME AVENUE I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I HADLEY ROAD R.O.W. T7 I I N/F I N/F I N/F I N/F N/F N/F N/F I G. k W. I L. k L. I B. BARNEY I T. k P. L.P. BROOKS I R. k M. F. k J. GRICGS BROOKS J. KAHAN HASKINS ( I I REDFIELD KOCHMAN M. STARKMAJ N/F J k B SNYDER c — — AUS R AN F I I N/F TER � W. WOLFE I Al eEEPRHc aaLo.s IEY/ ®AR HEDGE BACON STREET — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 7 r---� I I I C I Y I I �qs N/F N/F A. do R. 4 Cv CHAMPLAIN OIL CO. INC. REYES IS W B (typ B o 0 W I z B t I m m e J • ° BEN FRANKUN W t 3 CONCRETE PARKING O' CURES r 1W ►Me0%G MEOt.tNM9F:: EN FRAH1U N WY PRIOR PEe4TT) 105 SPACES WVNY 11.700 SF . 250 SFWACE 47 SPACES• SEAWAY CAR WASH 10 SPACES CHFT7ENOEN SAW PUBLIC USE 400 SF . 100 SFWACE 4 SPACES GENERAL USE 1,600 SF . 2SO SF/SPACE 2 SPACES MAI&Nos SEATS 365 ST . 3 SEATSS►ACE 122 SPACES CROSS AREA 19.511 SF - 4.380 SF - 12,131 SF 12.131 SF . 200 SF/SPACE tt BRACES TOTAL REQUIRED (EXCLUOVIG OVERLAP) 357 SPACES 'TOTAL PROVIDED 293 SPACES ♦ ADJACENT PROPERTY 50 SPACES OR AFTER 6..00 PM ]OO SPACES 333 TO 363 SPACES 'CURRENTLY HAS A MAIp1UNI OF 30 EMPLOYEES ON SITE FROM! 3-00 PM TO 2:00 PM, 91iD01G COVERAGE W/EN FRANILIN W W EN FRAM LIN LOT SaE / 1.61 Ac. 11.19 Ac. B DG. AREA 1.35 A<. 093 AC. RDG. % 11.6% 13% ALLOWED 30.0% 30.0% LOT COVERAGE W/ EN FRAN(UN WW EN FRAN(LN LOT GOV. AREA 4.09 Ac. 5.E7 1. LOT GOV. % 52.5% E0.7% ALLOWED 70.0% 70.0% 0 SAIEVTE DISHES ANTENNA p WvNY PARKWA r— r- r - --r— r -T SOUTH BURLINGTON FACTORY OUTLET CENTER r"- -T- r- I I I N /F I I I I HEATHCOTE ASSOCIATES I I PHILIP MEHLER REALTY ' BAMBINOS LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDGE OF PAVEMENT/CURB SUNKEN CURB ........................... ------------- SIDEWALK DUMPSTER 0 TREE TG5 0 SHRUB 0 O FENCE \1\1 HANDICAP RAMP ALL W C. PEARSON I `< y 1dIT1ERN CEDAR N/F BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, INC. I N;/F i R.M. STEVENS JOY DRIVE F-1,2 N/-- OLYMPIAD I COUR'. ASSOCIATES I ' I I I #70 1 N/F IDMNG HEDGE I I OLYMPIAD 1 IRY21[MIN[7 -----------------_------J COUR 1 ASSOCIATES I I --4 --4Iw I Ii-1— LGARDENSFOR '�------------------jwIS7.. e I I r I r I I I r r I I t I I -y I Orl Or FFRp NEW ENTERRRIs CITY DF SOt/TH BURUW _yl- yl N/F NEW ENTERPRISES. INC. i I I ia3 � laMGkat.tlaaa Cemm9L5■ma fta Ii6aEe5a 35 hoar GYndu Dwwf Fle•`.eM1IY Arland 2.5 ". A. an — I B 22 TL Capea LktlaMa/ thtlen 2x- C.I. A. slnwn I I I C 35 Ourns Riser. McYBrrn Pad Oak 2%' Cal. N Shawn 30 Jadperu Hon— J w n s.E: e.eYallr lOD Ancl—Jnipar :Gal. w..Pklp w.ows r C.I. Rao MWe.Fbn 2 Gal 24. O.C. E.W. 40' D.C. E.W. Q m Y1fl 0eN K 24.0 C E W • Q •-S-f7 !DN K p•`i C D 36 FVEAM�'•.• •.` 1 TN* Oed0ena9a N.0— WNa Cady 3'-4' HS.S' O.C. 8 �2-FI DIW Irf GRAPHIC SCALE ihF: ► 20 ma mg.A—lim, Pins 3.4'H1 10-Q.C. z>n mu N Se D 2s 5C Hoc toc 350 - Date Ch'k'd :C Drawn by - I IN 3EaT) Checked by _ 8 IVED i IE - MAY 10 1993 City of So. Burlington LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSE-, -- PROPERTY LINE -- 213 ---- CONTOUR 213 o LIGHTING d e. -- -- — • FLOOD LIGHTS HADLEY ROAD R.O.W. -___—________ CURB SUNKEN CURB ............................. -- -- -- — I -- -- w— WATER Ms s— SANITARY SEWER 5 sT— STORM SEWER ss I i I N/F I N/F I N/F I I N/F I N/F I N/F N/F N/F c— GAS c #80 I I I G. & W. I L. & L. I B. BARNEY I T. & P. L.P. BROOKS R. & M. I F- & J. I I W.C. I Ilf—UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC �E I I N/F GRIGGS BROOKS J. KAHAN , HASKINS I I REDFIELD I KOCHMAN I I PEARSON I Y I I R.M. STEVENE M. STARKMA 1n '� : POWER POLE SHUT-OFF VALVE N/F J & B SNYDER _ ROD REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF HANDICAP RAMP _— _ / 1 1 V I JOY DRIVE I I I N/F I I I W. WOLFE I __ . I ! I \ \\ T -- a - —\ rt / / // I N/F OLYMPIA_: 'VXCUW S7REVI'-s _ —� s N/F BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, INC. I COURT s I - T-------�Z : P'--- _.1 I / \ - / \ ) / ASSOCIATES 4AT TE I I I i / to I 1❑ q�9 IN I Ash, I ` / N I I ILEI I \\ 9shd \\ N/F \\ \ \ m wvNY CHAMPLAIN_OIL C�I INC. REYES I Y �� \\ 11.700 5F \\ II �F70 I \___ / w L---- -- --- -------- / A1ED CB-1, -\ I / I N/F I a W / ST •—•— VACUUMS / . I ,— \ I �\ / C3 TOTAIy / OF I �` \\ 1 �I, OLYMPIAD 1 ; ` _� _ ea ae _ I I ( 1 `\ \ \` L__..___-��-__-�__-_�___-___J rl\ ' ASSOCIATES • I z f`- � \ I 11 ' I CO /I 2 BEN FRANKLIN I �s- --- �__� U — \ — — — — — \3,9 _ -•���' a ?F— Y' _J zzs /� I / w 7a' / u ------ 1a Isiz: _7 z,� _ a te.` L `�� I \ 1 I HOME I i i /Ems s / AVENUE / , �� �t Co - BAMBINOS / , e I / PAD Ce (fwsN t I ` tr sneUa tasn sF �- I�-�wi I I II 1 / Rao f NY+r3. ! 4-���a 'I'o to sealEs -1--_ UGITNc 12' I' RK— Eae \\i Qi'••• (TYP.) I !/ 0 DELI PAWAY I I / - - - - - - - - Y YY w GARDENS FOR A.L. INC. _� hOD 10 \ I \\ 1 1 C0(D�O ` \ �{ ___--- a —11�00 12tpp t3hD0 ta+00 RIIG DID MPWE _ `� _ F// 1 1 / co- FUTVRE LENTE tuNE a I I D'OF1.L PENMAY FROM NEW ENTERPRISES. INC. 0 I I CITY OF SOUTH BURUUNGTON _ SOUTH BURLINGTON �� 7— // / N/F NEW ENTERPRISES, INC. FACTORY OUTLET CENTER WALL 200Lsro•Pvc ��/ 1-- —1 s.o.owFTn'T /—� _/ NOTE: ALL STORM DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE SDR 35 PVC, 213 '---- // / j / HOPE (ADS) PIPE OR CONCRETE PIPE. _ / N� I I i STDRY DRAINAGE EASV E D EYENEiE may! /�/ N FAVOR OF DAMO C FA L AND STYART X. YoCOXA9 ILY, � A HEATHCME ASSOCIATEST�t�YAs'yF,at PHIIIP MEHLER REALTY I \ t 1 I I' =,�11G i / �• 2DE / / =� - / MAY 10 1993 },_93 �Y REYD'IARgNG, tMTER aDRANAGE lTSTFAlS -- NSTALL NEW STORY YH `u-' DEY A°OEO ""E't ""�`"' OVERALL U TI LI lY PLAN DYN_2 ,•"^•'' a-2-a3 DRY ADDED a' aaa eATN NY.2 DA. t... W-211a.03 (MATCH EIGSTNO)„`y •• ,t. tit-0D DSY Yovm suac xR.opltARtAaE DeRawrt O'DELL PARK PCD GRAPHIC SCALE i.zis DeEI REWFD arAe am oR otxu PAwc.R. 25 10C rk gt 2� City of So. Bu0IT Date Ch'k'd Revision SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMO',-' 111W 1 --- _- - - - , - Drawn by ACL Date APRIL, 1993 CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES , INC. N SHEET ( IN �) Checked by DSM Seal. r . sc -3 II u u / 11 II / II II �4 � II 11 II u W u , u W II II I It Z I I ( J W 11 I � II I II II , II II � I! �t ho 11 I I � MODIFY E)OrnNC TRAFti1C f TWAws-oP swr �I I HOME Ji / (AVENUE i }} INSTALL r WME _ T — CONCRETE CWSONAL ISLANC !; I 41 I I I i I I I I N W 0 a. 2.' N/F nNc Y c> I I I 1 I I 1 I I )I \ I EwsCo I \\\ N/YF I CHAMPLAIN /OIL CO. INC.:: A. k R. / I REYES f r I I f I 1 --- / I I I \\\—— — —— — ! 2 —'— — L------------- -------- ------- ®-3 i� so--�-- s I - ROYAL( SIREET SIGI INSTALL SWP SIR, -TMK t•\ RAMP co-, ►0 R ME • O OS (FRT) � rrv.�207.e II ! II II / 20 / II / 11 / INSTALL PRECAST CONCRETE PNtlOMO � cm T SPACE X CIRM 2 a: aa'00.00- R . 50.01' T : 33J4' L R2Jf b � ll-TYPE 1 _ MATOA E)OSrNC1-.3' GRADE II / RECEIVED W MAY 10 1993 City of So. Burlip9ton J*00 i r � \ r MISTALL I ` � D � I ' i \ / SAW CUT OaSTN0 LOLOADINGSEA Z 1 ---------------> `' CONCRETE PADREMATED I I ----- -- —� I i vAwuus � I (3 TOTAL) .5 v .AE. D D cnc II q — I % RELOCATE'EIOSTNO VACUUMS AANNDD , i REMOVE IS=D / I ) BEN FRANKLIN I ) sr Oe-13� / 1 I TT►E 2 sTACE I / I o-I2 I it i _ 33 o e v = = e = = v = = v U = h��� �TYPE t RMF-NSTALL 5' CONC. SIDEWALK "l \•L TYPE i RAMP WIN II II 'I „ INSTALL 5• WE1ECCAtC. SIDEWALK �,II ���///''' Ce (DOST) I NM-2,3.DJ Ny.-211.711 D. INSTALL SPEED UWT SIGN (25 MPH) -� TYPE 1 RAMP Ia -----� CB-5 ST 5+00 TA 6+00 O'DELL PARKWAY Wv: IN57ALL 5' WOE CONC SIDEWALK 0 - TYPE RAMP 3 f� iwE 2 SPAKZ NEW / BANK BLDG. El. EL 217.5 Gs -IS- TYPE O PWG END Or APE e CURVE 3 i L GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 tO 20 !C ac ,ac ( IN FRET ) G 12'r2'],' 4 R 202.62' N MATCN T 35.20' GRADE AT R.O.W. L 6e.70' LINE (TIT.) UTILITY & GRADING PLAN — WEST OF v�M �=�.••;�•• �'''•: O'DELL PARK PCD • R, Date Ch'k'd Re —ion SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMON Drawn by AACL Date MAY 1993 SHEET CMcked by DSM Sute r - 20' CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. SrELaJRPE, VEAMONT C -4 Approved by — Project No. 93108 TYPE 1 RAW / I I I / / / / / / / r I f i , / , , / , , / 0—LL PAN a IL, Cal II- 0. M) 12' Cat w - M. , ts, II' Out (N M. ) 12' M3 RN - M. ti Isl /2" M. ti (EI Exut. M. Out Iw) Erixt. (L4 RMn - M.Out MI 12' C86 fYm - M. Y�IsI 12' M. Ovt (E) 12' Cab I— M. to rs) 12' M. ti IN) 15' M. QR RI 15' Cat Rin - M. ti ml 15' h— In 6Nw) 16' M. ti fsl 15' M. Out IEI 16' cab Rm - — 0t MI 15' Ca9 11Mn M. , IE) 16' M. MINI 12' YNr. Out RVI 1E' Ca20 Rb - M. M (NWI 12" M. 0i (SI 12" a21 Rm _ M. 0. (SE) 12' DA l Rm _ M. m Iwl 13' M. ti (EI 1S" M. 01n ISI 16" piF2 fYn _ M. ti IN) 15" M. to (E) 16" W.- M. put M) 16' Wait) STOM I4E DIFOIWATION ME mm LENGTH ILA. Calm Cat 4p' 12' Cat m CB-3 3" 12' cS" m Cb5 27' 12' CS-5 I. CS-6 122' 12- CS-6 m C&7 143 15" Cad I. Ca7 27' 15' Cal m D' H 1 75- 16" VM I m Ot4142 200- 16' Ca9 m DMA l 122' 16" Ca 10 m Ca9 3B' 16' M11 m Ca 10 27' 12' Ca. 12 .12 m Cab 95' 15' M13 m Ca' 12 42' 12" Ca14 m CS-12 83' 12' Cats m Ca7 W' 16' M 16m Ca15 115' t5" Ca17m CS'62' 15' Cal E m Ca9 24' 12' Ca 19m CS10 48' 15' M20 m Ca19 23' 12' 214.E I10.95 210.75 215.5 211.9 215.25 20&15 M7.b 206. 10 211.W 20,110 201.0x I cN .` L c t I 204.Ox YncA On M 058 MAY 10 1993 0.84 0.93 o.e2 O.n 2II City of So. Burlin too 98 098 . 1.11 222 0.51 5.05 0.51 p.sl 0.52 0.55 2.06 1 96 1.74 Ca21 m Ca20 16' 12' &61 c -- — — — —i \ 220 22, _ `_�-4, — — — \` _— �� zie I ) 1- ---- ■ FUTURE - Nr 42- I tI I � I I � I � ---------- +--- ---- -I -- FUTURE �� i i ---- --- - 1 ^ _ _ -I----- -----I----Y ----J---r ----� 1 Z/ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - - - _ _ - -�— TAPPNO SHINE, r VALVE ANDlox —C I � I / 1-00 J I 13+00 1 ' /_ ��y� �./ I 12+� I I FU V CEER N1UNE OF OTE1L PMKMAYI— GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 ,c x IQ (aFgr) UTILITY & GRADING PLAN - EAST O'DELL PARK PCD SOUTH BURLINGTON n SEE SHEET C-3 FOR OUTLET NFOWAI,ON Drrw, by AcuM,Iw Date �M Cbrckrd by — ScNr Aoorovrd by -Dsm Pro)*' NAY. 1993 1 SHEET r . 20 CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. -.� SHELBLXI E . VEP IDN7 G7-O' RIGHT OF MY' 60'-0' RIG1fT OF My S- - TS _ I SwAL 8R11efvous CONC. PVMT. I CONC. - _ RriT_Usm101e CONC. PVYT. IBASE C I CORB I COURSE CCU# 8�� COURSEn� EIRE N 1 CUM12}`BASE .1 !" CRIBYEO I s 1 "PER PER FT. "PER FT. !- CIRdED "PER FT. PER FT. FT. ...... ... 1 ...... .... ...... _ .D FI .::: 6- GRAVEL 605E COURSE 1 $AND FILL I .... t: '. GRAVEL EEODNG EASE COURSE SAND FILL.' - I SAND Ir GRAVEL STORM SEWER I C t LEDGE t �I CUSMON EASE COURSE :/'- GRAVEL WEDDING 1 t G" SAND Ir GAVEL t CUSHION EASE COURSE �EDN RA LEDGE �_O' EDED IF NEEDED (PVC OR CONCJ rr-O, UNDEADRAN I IF NEEDED (PVCSTOR (PVC OR CONCJ FILL sECTlor1 u CUT SECTION J FILL SECTION s C CUT SECTION NOTES J MON MOTERWLS TO COIFORM TO VERMONT NGMMT T l DEFT, IALSSpECCOWO ADOPTED 1972. SURFACE 2 Ew1r6E TOAD SECTOO TEAR S. ALL GRAVEL TO E APPROVED By THE CRY W-O" I6CR17 Of WAT ENG' EER OR MS CE"r 4. ALL STORY SEWER 5T1rUCTVES 10 E APPRWED Ey THE CRT EW.PCER TYPICAL SECTION STA,1+00 TO I+80 w.RE.51r TO z2' 1 orTualole cow PVWT Noce N TYPICAL SECTION STA. 3+30 TO 10+05 CpK. , -EASE COURSE TTL CTRm I} SUFACE COIIRBE 0 l0 !' CUM t I SCALE: r . 6' ' PER FT. - PER FT. 19' (RRM�) I ` ]" au!SwD " PER FT. I I- R I ................ ...........A ................................................ - .... . URSE i! S TILL SEWER �K OR CoNCJ E-��•' FIt/lEL EODrOr. I F SAND Ir GRAVEL BASE COURSE_ 'I CUSHON rr UNDENDRAIR IF NEEDED I62 K t IV C FILL SECTION - MAY 10 1993 r j J City of So. Cur(intcl TYPICAL SECTION STA, I+80 TO 3+30 SCALE: r . 6' 222 222 ---' 121 220 YC I / END OF ROM Ii 218 218 I o G w > M r _ AMID) AATE EXISTING 216 216 i w C 'O __ --- - 214 214 - 0 - I GRADE I ne — I — 212 ZOJ FUTURE ALL s �.r•+ I II I �'' D 210 210 •N S•�r�PVC 2 FTyI`T �1 �IfT /'' II 16- PT U " 1 S .0 R!' PVC g •OAR' 206 208 FT S • rE O.OIgpT N II �F T y V n m ai 0 N I O 206 206 N• w o 0 m NN .. o uN� 000 n m ai AOi m 6 000 O 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 N j o&cO. �m0 m00 n0 �ZZZi u 204 220 »> N0 U O N�N' �¢»_> it H n 202cS_b dr rN.. r- rrAii» inl =1 .0 K Ni PROFILE 8 CROSS SECTIONS O DELL PARK PCD 200 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 '-µrrµe� 0+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 ml 'o 0 �; T Date CN'k'd Revision 50. EURLNGTON SHEET PROFILE - 9 Drawn by Mew Dele MAY,1993 CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES , INC. r . 2' VERTICAL AS NOTEDj,�/FE, 1C r • 30' HORIZONTAL Chocked by � Scale t/ Approved by ..0111 Project No. Mica TYPICAL SIDEWALK DETAIL NTS 1 _ __ DEPTH:I/4' EXPAMS'C" JOINT MATERIAL TYPICAL SIDEWALK JOINTING DETAIL KTs. SURFACE A G Ri- d Lss sr�� PLAN PAINTED LINE SIT. CONC. ROAD PAV'T DOLLARD WIT11 HANDICAP PARKING SIGN PAINTED HANDICAP PARKING SYMBOL I f-HIGH CURB LAWN OR PLANT RED PAINTED LINES HANDICAP PARKING SPACE TYPE I - TYPICAL KT5. I ►AINTED LINE EDGE (TYP.) BIT. GONG. ROAD ►AVT EP a 1' WIDE DOLLARD WITH HANDICAP PARKING SIGN PAINTED HANDICAP PARKING SYMBOL rj::T t i G S- HIGH CURB ^ iP WALK ►AVT LENGTH I MILKRaR VARIES TEXTURED }' REVEAL SIDEVIIALK ROIRpM R0IFONG TEXTURED AY SURFACE 83%MAX S.O%MAX APMCEN7 TO RAMP SECTION A -A ROADWAY SURFACE TOP OF CURB RDADNAY SOEM■LLK S SURFACE }• REVEAL CURB TRANSTXXI 2OX MAX ttwB SECTION B-B SECTION C-C SIDEWALK RAMP TYPE I KTs. PAINTED LINES f •�I . PNDMED MADE INT. CONC. SURFACE COUP" DR. CONC. SINDER COURSE PROCESSED AGGREGATE DANK RUN GRAVEL GEOTEXTILE ►ASRIC COMPACTED SYSGRADE INTERIOR BIT CONC ROAD AND PARKING LOT PAVEMENT KTS. `+ LANE i LANE PER CAL SECTION PER TYPICAL SECTION r D I w — — SH/ DR 9u" SwL 4. 4• swL IYYL on EMENT MARKING PLACEMENT DETAIL - TYPICAL KTS. gm jr..laD ■atOK1 TAt M OOc•.'O^1O-'O-_O�08C ' O I r a■Rlo auto ■•s: c :llY tYR M■AI OutR. 'y�■A,z wto■K ...... ') IKttur � rttmt � N tr altars rst B Ato�suat � m.Xtt�elc"� a tutmuL�mlwN► ro # .•snD IOatAt101 r-uM D/Y s•aa RRRa a mAcl CURB DETAIL KTS 1- tv ccul>z�wawa fit[ ,vrE ■ r M•a mM><-aw t) tMtst•o salt Mc rnGt■unm I to ssos t■w t/•' art ■rnm axots D aFNNe vwmat X■rH sou c mGttunm Etatr aa' •tR sou N C061MlCIIO v wtDtut mtIOMIG ro AMMO IIOalA1tON V-t11 p/Y loner A1R■P a TnN1 ADJACENT ►AVENENT N —1 aw A I .Frtbat +o.T =/+•+t� BEGIN TRANSITION SLOPE • CONIC. WALK .Q� - PAV'T TO MEET LINE S GRADE OF ADJACENT PAV'T CURB DETAIL W / SIDEWALK CONC. WALK ►AVT • SLOPE DOWN TO BIT. KTS_ ans CONC. ROAD PAV'T M p HEAVY SNOOK FINISH q�'✓�, —11 • SEE PLAN FOR TY►IE END TRANSITION SLOE • CONC. WALK PLAN ►AVT TO MEET LINE A GRADE OF BIT. CONC. ROAD ►AVT ttl� I/f FINISHED GRADE OF ADJACENT ►AV'T SIDE SLOPE • HEAVY BROOM IINISH LATCH A EIOSTS G FINISHED GRADE OF SIT- COHC. ROAD PAV'T � CURB Y +^ ISOMETRIC o0000Q0o0 I{� n COIC.WALKPAVT nf 00000000Q000p0BANK RUN GRAVEL O 000 OO O Q 0 COMPACTED SUBGRADE % O O O O ......................... SECTION (TYPICAL) ......... HANDICAP RAMP TYPE 2 - TYPICAL KT5. CENTERLINE OF CURVE ADJACENT PAVEMENT BEGIN TRANSITION SLOPE •GONG. WALK PAV'T TO MEET LINE A GRADE OF ADJACENT MATERIAL S- HIGH CURB • SEE PLAN FOR TYPE CONC. WALK PAV'T • SLOPE DOWN TO BIT. CONC. ROAD PAV'T END TRANSITION SLOPE -CONC. WALK PAV'T TO MEET LINE S BADE OF BIT. CONC. ROAD ►AV'T HEAVY BROOM FINISH SIT. CONC. ROAD PAV'T f - NIGH CURB HANDICAP RAMP TYPE 3 - TYPICAL KT.S. I IAr ABOVE ROAD PAVEMENT --' :::::::: ..... .......... ......... ROAD ••t-.• Y}•• \. e YgBy =0:., • • 1) GXIBIG BWL E C257R1CTO M tr SwV0WS rM I/r XNT rn•XN We E7�ANSION JOBR Custc t»— erns sort ME oGts+tnR.'Rn Ewn Xr ASPHALT TREATED FELT --13 Attt -.A K CCMTNILT[D BF w11■•L WIP0 _ YC SSECTION A -A DRIVEWAY INSTALLATION NTS IV t NBCETE GIB RPW1HR!]OILEpIT ■V•ANi. AID MAY 10 1993 CURB DETAIL KTS City of So. Burlington MONOLITHIC CURB DETAI N.TS. W L.ar, cone_._ ary ro r.crt FL FVATION CONNECTION TO EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE • as /as1 r•CL afT IM.L O.ILLL I axwiY am a a4i JLrr axe !cr%ri Dw e r as mwo ar arxx TrYle coavr pr•vr r°a Auaraao.r, raro� oi+rTl %a awuor I aL,oL Ao °� a.,.aLa raa..Dnane a..rL arvr a rac acre a .� u.ar • �. TYPICAL STORM MANHOLE lrrfr_ ®. •r. NL.CN a�.-.•am naa .r•MED arTn A I�TK IaCrefww✓i LCV4 t0- � ro.Drnm rvc rrL trr au I NDERDRAIN DEETT41 at..aLr px T IC•DED rfY11 rtVG CLLMraR p% •I CaafiEM- LCOOOfM 1- pl 70 IVC pN( KIIEr DI RE 4aT rlal VLLVL .r rr[V [irOr px Ta' lCTgn •� LDVCL 11•I.IQD -lMET [al•wUrr TO ! w1ALLID i�z ac�rr�a�s rH•»cc E71 mcznr [%®wa .al-a.°c caaerc arot[ rr a r r°trcnrrtn[ •10 wrneTe TYPICAL CLEANOUT DETAIL .r1 i � rw w�cow a w® i•Ti� %WA r 1IIK ■ YTT VLLVE teat a.T. •wr• LrrrovLD O / as artrrrsTxxn r Dl - LDrellE Y1L`/E fiw rt !ww wW N W TAPPING SLEEVE B VALVE ara N"a N'ur%•rLa rpuM � 1 Il.•rIrED %11AaE ` L ` L L.- x N r•T[rrrrr art lrra � � r.aTx: a aaa a•a¢T rroa r r et r aat I �xoramc r•aL .. !. � � r sro waa TYPICAL CATCH BASIN rra - nwr .cur a nArrm rr••c LfA ..ter `:.y � rr•ac r rvu �crru am •rxr at•. ana L.rrawa TFWa L� %RWI.f nos a r u aLLL ua¢T. rluiT m.CliL - f;Lm.r .wrAa lP .RM aDt6Rla: aLK rY%Cfm FL�LE o,rol rrn r tlpt.p Y ¢nrm ms ratmrlc raunw •aaao ura rAaw rlrT A! mux .i"w%ar or•rru r OWm rMR TYPICAL CATCH. BASIN AT CURB .rs. ! TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL STORM aTs WATER I SEWER CROSSING DETAIL agrL al1 aTllrea AK m rvL r¢.-tuc nvns TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL SEWER `rs TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL WATER .rs !1 BLOCKTHRUST DETAILS W41MLW AREA OF BEARM SURFACE OF CONC. THRUST BLOCKS �B ' �D�OOO�Of�0�0�0�0�00�®0 ov0000000e�0000000©moc�,r-� Rio OOOODDO�OmO�QC'�OP'^157f n7�4�{�If ra.'1 00000©oo��o��co¢��o�o Lr,r.IwrYrLrr.� raa ... rY �r•.I r �r.r rr t rrr r.rrrr..rYrrvr. 1. Wrr rr-0wr�.a.�� r lrra.^r..r R.r.•gar� ♦ r�rrrr.rra rrN.. rr+. rrr• ra.r� err r 4 rr.1.�4 rrr. r rf r .rma a. rYr..r..+r rrarrrr rY rrr b raa�• rrr aar r...r � o+' oL a Tr rr rr.r.•. err rraa��+ w rrrrr�.ry.r �.rrn asacA,..rt 1. )rlra r..rr�rr r.W r.+rrwT.. rn. ..r r...r..r....r...r.rrr.r..,.-.� 1 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION RECEAVED MAY 10 1993 City of So. Burlington 1'wt`TRSATM —11 OECORA.TNE 11-Cl r r+>t rosT cTTr> I111B�111111',III 11 B IIIIIII �F 0 7I\ BI ■ - AMCNoe sTeA► TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATION KTS. W000■N IRNSTER �o M ■ 1NCLcsurr 6RAu A -O w0 DUMP57FT COJMG turn ta4 rRtSSKt n TRCATEo MST l Tyr_) —+ Llbrvum luS ` CONK �Lj Otcom^TWE 6ATE r� CANS EOLT tT• TO MATCH p1COEA.TNt FENCE. TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION KTS. Z.e�.F'!-•' {Y w�l`lo. to txivrrox a�M1' � rL.ca R x.xCxea 4fa tur V.�CIO la s'-'�la[. ..La Is. v.c o TAaa RAArnxo To wou -- r000 ow N[rAL IL A. roAxsuc[Ll Ox [ TRKfr Toi`oiwuucaA x aurx uKRc[A CYT . qL0 s.c[ TO/ _ V) 0I [ux Ll.• S �11Y O • lL fal L. 'L %IIAIAN M.A[ 1 1 Hl/AAts TO/aOKt sACA /N.L I MIL• PDA scs.." a Yssu KIY -- G■CAA .Tuaa. JOA .,SARI[. etas rs[ — —A' wTIM t1.11•-.• MOA lTus,. TREE PLANTING TYPICA mL — r CEDAR STAKES W A CUT MOTCH- - M VIRE PASSED THKOUGH SECTK W- OP GARDEN HOSE TO PROTECT TRUNK PAPER TRUNK WRAPPING — LAYER 9MfADED BARK MULCH (TO 4 APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARORTECT) APPR. C SAUCER R■I LOOSEK CUT. ■ REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP } OF HOOT BALL PLANT TREE AT SAME DEPTH AT WMOK TREE HAD PREVIOUSLY GROWK allm C SNiE II ) I I11�� wl,- 2 'L.. NILL 41 sP is CONIFEROUS TREE l 1K1il=TS.� DECIDUOUS TREE;- TRUNK ARMORING DETAIL s. 2 • 4 WOODEN STAKES DPIVEN WC Q' ■ETO THE GROUND FLIER FABRIC W NOTE EXCAVATE A G-. G' TRENCH AROUND CR L OUTSEDE OF SLT -. FENCE AND EXTEND FLIER FABRC INTO TRENCH. BACKFLL ■ COAPACT SOIL FLOW FLOW CATCH 101"' SILT FENCE INSTALLATION AT CATCH BASINS N.T.S. FINISH GRADE MULCH FINISH GRADE GRASS MULCH LAYER LANT LIST SPACING . !d •.., nIN PREPARED TOPSOIL b I NOTE: -UNLESS CALLED FOR OTHERWISE, NO CENTER OF ANY SHRUB SHALL BE CLOSER THAN 4'-0' TO ANY WALK, CURB, OR PAYEMENT. SHRUB BED PLANTING TYPICA d� ? 4- aAu¢R Rr 4- LATER OF S/KEADED BANK MULCH' f0 BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE AROV —LOOSER. CUT. ■ REMOVE SULAP FROM TOP In OF ROOT BALL PLANT SHAUS AT SAME DEPTH AT aR1OV MKUB HAD PREVIOUSLY GAO" �•-ROTC lMIREAOED BARN MMLLCN AIO WEED BARER iABRIC TO� TO OE C[I1RM10U5 WFEN ...rl= :.... = _ � IIl_ilUl .III =JIB —FKlMR BALL 8 BURLAP SHRUB BARE ROOT SHRUB Uv KTS. rxrT+uPRERev+ .w' TJOI AND ■tAPED J' ■.Low MEC!N pE ELMUAS FOR FENCE 24- OR LOWER) FX7ER FAARM LEAPED OR W" TO IESTL TO BE AORAn Na O/ APPROVED ECUAL ao• O y r y yr POAC AowT t! y POST `{L7EF FABRIC 70 !E C1Y'FEO. JPAow .PILL POST J' !' BAaaxLEO ANO TAMPED J- • xC(.O O A BELON CtADE STEEL ON WOOD STAKES SEE CMRT ■ IUGIIT NOTES AT FENCES AT TOEs OE ~o7EC)ED SLOPES AND AsNSrAU PARALLEL 10 CONTOURS As POSSWLE. CURVE ME ENDS Or THE FENCE UP WTO THE YO^E IE]!OV£ SEDIUENr IM1E1V ACCLUVLA7ED TO HALF THE too T OF THE FENCE DYITRACTCR SHALL INSTALL 5¢T FENCES A THE TOE OF ALL FELED OR UNPROTECTED SLOPES CREA70 DLR/NG CONSMUC77CN Nor NECL3SAR21 REFLEC7ED ON FINAL PLANS SILT FENCES ARE TO BE LAWTAINED UNIX ROPES ARE STABd/7ED. AND REWAW THE PROPERTY OF 7NE CONTRACTCR SILT FENCE DETAIL KTS. RECEIVED MAY 10 1993 City of So. Burlington n b!° bi 1 ��•��� HID, i 9*p.�ai{,�.. ;a �ebpgt a ei 1.11I ISi ! 1 111 l.�bi a f 7.�. li mail I 11h t �� � i� ; - ININH u01builin8 •oS±; C661 o T AVW ➢ 8.@= bl tjj I i pv i' t 91 i . 140i b i 1 °g ➢.� )pgae i a �� Siy , kiex =b ➢ = x yg < 7ep{a .b r �JJ g3a i y�.@Y gy a a `�B� 3 ��� ➢6 6< gy � i� � � ��� �ggyy➢�� � R• Ba e.@ i L� <i i■ � � y .� yy �i< y�➢� �a �g.axi si c5a888 �➢b��� � CyA� �� $ U � ���� �'� gP ��� ��^�� 1`l �i�.g� ��� ➢� ��g � i zZ� �:i9�y �g�� �i�� �i '�ii i y.:�. e,.°�1$ � iy�- 5 � or o �1 air 9 � i :�i�..� la� � ����c� �➢ , ��iY� $ � ��# i�ij �P�b.�_ i■b �� y �@i:� ➢�i �� �,b � .�yC � ��. E� �y dit J29 e.• x � 5 9 5 p ! � 5. � b �.i l i 7 Y �� 2E� � � i g➢6� B. i� ��1�� 4q, 9�R�a'`3g Ij�� S� �<��� �. ����, i i� 6 � ��:� �� 6 � �..g 1 S1Yx.. l [ill @i ipi �$ e�5i � �"yi y� �7 �`aic � �� @ e b� E 3 � > i'�■ 'fin � -� J tt ➢ S'�i � L� $ e �� �^ $ 41f'4b`e'i 3�j ���:�o ��89 id� ��b 8���� ��7�i �>��9��� ���� ��i ����f� �9 �� �.9:�� sl��� ������ ��ei �➢� ���l�x� �o� �����a �l�i� ��1 s� ��� >�a$a��l $ B�'�' � ■.■ yy: b ° °� b � '� �Yg i� y�9 $y "„^ k 14111 r a 14. i� @ a b}'91 Y.,�_ ° 9y�S ie7 q ynYH�ib S�g➢ g �8 jQa 2fdi' 7➢ �5� ■�a �a�aS i■b-� '�BrBbcl g ik� e„ ,�'�b71 �.�, B;; } 5 � ➢.a�ii a Ii a R ➢ a igg �i7 gg lY 98 B a��5�a8 ns q� .�. ����a ��� �➢� it��tle�� lye� IV �. g �p y ie ifi,i7 �i i �i GP 11 ` ➢1 6i a 1. P 700L t! Eig��g�6 �6➢a�� i�ri��ib� J�� jl�i.�'.�P n$ Y➢5 ��$ � �;,��1�Y1 :fi ir. �� t➢ ^ � Itiy� iy# �� �d Bi E�z �^ ! Yk y � � ■ �p � a � B�@i FF $��ib ;��e$ �i£d$�j5 j 97 jaF➢1➢E lr a$�jj �b�i�e ���rl �i� #�� bg�^� � �� ,F� ■ 1 � �iL®��_ yx � l�k xod g■ � bB � ¢ � $ � y' .a r, a y 4a i� y �^�1 .y� � ���6 Yea .E � � � � �i ��g '° t• � b��i i� aG�l � ° �$ 1•'af7a�aeto^�,p x8 ¢ i�[e(i .t d aF�0.➢lib Y�tl OBEY F9 .1 B 9 b �ab � y�lj ri a a � Ra�� ���p b i � � a � ➢�� �Y � �B��i r6 �s� x�P 5$�€°€'y ➢say u till � ej�y1 �,�§ di$b� t $�a gg$$88gg gp� AggDP,.s_ �l^ t $ry b � � $���� 9$�$ f �98■i� ;���� �+ $�86 ftg sp" �L Bi gg�tt se9b i ' ; t b N ➢ 1� i a9 �A bppi y ` � zz F1 y`� a p. �S! i �5 y Y �gpppp■i �iia b $ �� i� � � �„i� J� fib i3 g8 �a � � � � $p�p� $ Bii� d �gg ypc .� iai➢5a�iy� Z�`�'�� �'gE,� � ���� y @q�i7� �jp��pb ci a j1h 1�'aj ���9 E� g � �e ➢ Y B £ $ �� � 6 a ��E���� �aC �b J 1 � ' f� r �7 �r-F' �9;��9 �'A�! {{ � '➢1 �y i�� $� It ���i ➢ b� � a i�i .y ' �i ii 8�5� ��' �s��5�i�� i E jj-� oil 41 3 N/F W. WOLFE BACON STREET i N/F 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -- -- 71- -- -- -- n - RqO 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0A 0.1 ----� o.t D. sF'9!y a.n o.o o,z 1.9 -11 J o '9Y C (�F 10.2 4p- T.6C Of 0.0. 0.1 Os 3:041.1 i < U • Y �( 1 0,1 0.1 2.f� l.3 q,A 0.0 0.2 0.6 2.2.'0.5 0. I I „Y WVNY TYPE 'A' TYPE W TYPE 'C' TYPE V TYPE 'E' (1) 15OW MRS TYPE a DISTR03UTKON (2) 175W MH. TYPE V DISTR18UTKIN (1) 175W MN, TYPE M DIST. W/H.S.S (2) 775W WI. TYPE I GIST. (1) 175W MH. TYPE I DIST. 'GE M-250 SERIES 'GARDGO' FORM TEN SERIES 'GAROCO' FORM TEN SERIES 'GARDCOFORM TEN SERIES 'GAROCO• FORM TEN SERIES UGHT STANDARD MOUNTED IN LANDSCAPED AREA TYPICAL N/F 0.0 0.0 'Q.0 :'0.2 11 1.7 0.6 .1 0.1 02 0.3'� 0..4.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 CIA 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0. 0.0 0.0 2 UGHT STANDARD MOUNTED TYP' I AL CHAMPLAIN OIL CO. INC. IC PARKING AREA 0.0 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.1 0.2 Q.1 0.2 ki, 0,6 1.5 2A 2.7 0.7 0.3' 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 Q., 0.0 F61� 1 0.0 OIO 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.l 0.0 0.1 0 2 0.1 1.1 I.l 0.8 0.30.3 1.3 2.9 3' 0 0.8 0.1 !.0 1.3 0.3 O.t i0.0 .1 0.]0.7 OA 10.7 0.7 0.6 0.8 O.s 0.8 0.3 .3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 w E K 1.0 03-•�C-a- �' q _ 1 0 7 2a l.e � 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 __ n 8 p'--p-0--v-r--oT._-._7 1.1 3 p l.a 0.7 Ip.z .3 0.3 0.f'-ffF-6 t.'Q .o Os Iy.i-3 o.1 l.z 3 3�1 `0 p.a o.z o. 00 00-ff3 0.0 OL a b.t 10.910.3I 03 �'T: - 1.3 `3�3 0. 0�0.23.7 0' ^' ^• ^• ^1 e.l_�, 0.1 O.l -- O.t -- B 1 La Z 8 1 0 1 0 3 0.1 0.2 0.8 3.1 4.8 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.7 .1 2.2 0.8 0.2 0.3 W0.6 0.8 0.7 0.3 0.3 r 1.1 2.0 1.9 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 1.5 2.8 1.9 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.9 .9 0 s \ 0 2 0 2 0 6 0 9 0 9 0 s 0 2 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 ,� co - C -- BEN FRANKLIN - - J J 0.2 01 02 0.2 0.6 2.1 2 3,210.4 0.1 l 0.3 �.5 7.0 2.7 1 O.l O.l 21 03 0.� 0.7-�:3 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 a.1-i] 1.8 .i.9 1.3 09 0.2'0.2 t.3 S.t 1_9 1t 02-0.2 1.1 _3.1 �8. 1.0 6.2 Ol_ 01 3.3. 0.1 0.1 0.0 0] 0.7.r..s. , l o.:' os z.7 e.Y os c..L_7-5-0 . D _ ,�( ..,1 I --L o1G HOME 'jI >, `: "� 0 0.2 Ls z.l ` o.e - .1 ojro•�-ro-- z.o e. 1.2 0 � o., 1.7 z>_ t.1 n.3 i CIL 1.7 8.000 Lo_ 1.3 -.2 ILL 0.. -3.2, os 0.1 0.0 AVENUE I �• -- - - 1.0 '� 0'�$ t.2 1.0 •6. .1 0.4 0.s o z Act] 0 o O.z l.z ..31 t.7 "0T BANK 7 0.3 0.1 0. { 3.0 �1.7 0.8 ?.f F�.P 1.o 0 0 i9 2 F.3- 1 0 -1 s ; hS o.6 i 2 &. t- 0.3 -i s7 0.7 0.0 0.0 ' I y gyp[. •,I 0.3- 0.9 0. 0. .3 OJ 0.2 'O.l oA---O.F--I4:i�A---►.i---O.F�as.-4:9II--0-0--d�t o z (8s I p• 0.3 0ll 0.0 o.s 3.9 1.0 BAMBINOS 10.5 I0.6 0.4 U_.2yTUlZ 0.3 VW TV.V 0.4 f0 2 ' 0.7 0.5 1.6 i CC 0.4 '0 2 0� 1'� 0.4 1.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 i 0rl ':1 1.0 U 1 BJ 0.6 0.3'II.i 7.7 O.l 0.1 O.I 0.0 0.0 0.` 0.11 O2 0.7 •b.B 0.5 0.3 _8t1 0.1 e.0 0.1 0.6 1.3 1.1 ,2.1 17 0.9 C.IT 0.2 1.0 2.0 1.9 09 10210.2 1.1 2.011.I 0.9 G2 0.1' 0.3 _1.9.0.2 0A 0.0 1 _ E ---'-- - - - - - - - - - '..I 0.1 a 1 :.'�,0.9 T. .3 se 3.4 1.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.5 1.59E.3 1.4 0.6 L�2- 0.1 O.l 0. 0.6 7. 1.6 0.2 � 2.3 �. 7 1.3 _Q�:�".i 2.0 IQ., Q.i.� 1 6 "p 7 .4�L E 0 LO •Qa_ I.3 9 i 0 {_ 0./ 3&C.6 0.1 0,0 1 0.1 0. �7 0.7 1.3 1.2. 3 0. 1 1. 0.6 0.1 1.4 34J-3.t.- 0.9 O.�-Ai 1.2 9.2-U 1.0 4.2 0.} 1.2 22-3.2- 1.0 1.9-0.4 0.4 2-9-0.3 0.1 0.0 ROADWAY STANDARD MWr.:................ 0.1 0.1 '� .9 0.6 0.1 0.7 1.1 2.6 �.1 1.0 0.6 0.6 1.2 2. �.3 1.0 0.6 0.] 1.7 2.8 2.1 1.2 1.0 0 7� � . 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.3 O.s 0.8 0.7 0./ 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.7 0.7 OA 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 . 0.2 0.0 0.0 NTED J � O'DELL PARKWAY IN LANDSCAPED ISLAND " _ n . TYPICAL 0.0 O.l 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 e.3 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.7 03 0.3 0.3 02 0.2 0.2`�"t I.T .. �A 1.1 0 s 0: r• �•70--•-- I.F 11 j1 .13 '0.2 _.1 O.t O.l O.I 01 0_j__^ • ^ • " • "' " •---0.i- 0.1 0.3 0.1 0 0 0.0 0.1 O.t 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 b0. i. „-. 1 3 X _0 d 8 0.7 :. 3 3. 1, .2 0.1 0.Y 0.0 .� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BMT aR CAOMMO UK TO PCUE .RE IM WIT. REBAR- I IT_�i 1� WE1D 18 low P1C FROM PQ' %,FMATE EC SI TC PVC SOUTH BURLINGTON FACTORY OUTLET CENTER XE 3 0.3 0. 0.`l�P` 0&`6 1.6 a 2 0.8 1.0 2.2A .6 t/ 0,3 -; 0.3'� .1 0.0 0.1 0.1 `I.T'-LD• .-� �•0.7 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.33 0.2 00.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 r� ---'1 SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN pp GROIM Ioo 11' ON CENTER I 1• - 50'-0• V V FOOTCANDLE POINT BY POINT RECEIVED MAY 10 199 City of So. BurlinIton POLE LIGHT IN LANDSCAPE AREA N.T.S. ePOLE LIGHT IN OPEN PARKING AREA N. 7. S. ROADWAY POLE LIGHT N. T. S. 1AA aA-4 L17 -fat tot IN, A - F�L /* , -, e,14 4-t AT �4 5t m No Text CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P. O. Box 485 (802) 985-2323 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 Fax No. (802) 985-2271 CHARLES R. DUNHAM President May 6, 1993 STEP A. VOCK Vice President JEAN -CAROL DUNHAM Treasurer Mr. Ray Belair Zoning & Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: O'Dell Park PCD Final Plat Application Dear Mr. Belair: Please find enclosed five full size sets and one reduced I V x 17" set of the final plat and supporting plans for the O'Dell Park PCD Final Plat Application. Also included is a completed application form and $30.00 application fee. Sheet C-1, Property Plan, depicts all the details listed in Items 1 through 9 of Section 204.1(a). Item 8, covering topographical and utility information, is shown on Sheet C-3, Overall Utility Plan. We have provided the following additional plans to satisfy the construction drawing submittal requirements: Sheet Drawing Title C-4 Utility & Grading Plan - West C-5 Utility & Grading Plan - East C-6 O'Dell Parkway - Profile & Cross Sections C-7 Roadway Details C-8 Utility Details C-9 Landscaping & Erosion Control Details C-10 Specifications Legal documents fer the, proposed right-of-way (i.e. irrevocable offer ot' dedication) and easements (e.g., drainage easement) are currently being prepared and will be forwarded to the City Attorney shortly for his review. STUDIES • DESIGN • INSPECTION • TESTING SURVEYING 8 LAND DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULICS & HYDROLOGY SANITARY & WATER FOUNDATIONS 8 STRUCTURES CONCRETE & SOIL TESTING Mr. Ray Belair Page 2 May 6, 1993 With regard to the conditions of the preliminary plat approval and any other outstanding staff comments, we would offer the following responses and explanations: Preliminary Plat - Conditions and Approval We concur that any previous approvals and stipulations affecting this property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. All exterior site lighting will be of the cutoff type. The only exception will be two localized lights on the south side of Bambinos at the two entrances. The new lighting has been designed (see revised Sheet SE-1) to minimize the dispersion of light beyond the property line. Any change in existing lighting or new lighting will be brought to the City Planner prior to installation. Catalog cuts on the replacement building mounted lighting will be forwarded shortly. 3. The final plat plans include not only the requested road typical section and storm sewer typical but also information on the roadway and storm drainage profile (Sheet C-6), sidewalks, curbing and striping details (Sheets C-7 and C-8). 4. A bond will be posted for the proposed landscaping work. 5 & 6. As mentioned previously, the legal documents for the public street R.O.W., easements and a "Notice of Condition" are currently being prepared and will be submitted shortly for staff review. 7. Plan revisions: a. The minimum caliper of the street trees has been increased to 21/2 inches (Sheet C-3) b. The minimum caliper of the site landscaping trees (Red Oak and Littleleaf Linden has been increased to 21/2 inches (Sheet C-3). C. The existing cedar hedge on the north side of the property has been revised to depict the existing limits of the plantings (Sheet C-3). d. The lighting design (Sheet SE-1) has been revised to utilize a luminaire within the O'Dell Parkway R.O.W. that will be maintained by Green Mountain Power. Mr. Ray Belair Page 3 May 6, 1993 e. A note identifying the relocated vacuums has been added to Sheets C- 2 and C-4 f. The proposed fire hydrant symbols shown on Sheet C-3 have been revised so that they are consistent with each other. g. The spelling of the abutter "Reyes" name has been corrected on all the plans (Sheets C-2, C-3, and SE-1). h. Concrete bumper ties have been added to the parking spaces adjacent to the public sidewalk (west of Ben Franklin) so as to prevent constriction of pedestrian movements by parked vehicles (see Sheets C-3 and C-4). A depressed curb has been added across the easterly entrance to Bambinos (see Sheet C-3 and C-5). j. Fourteen new spaces have been added between Ben Franklin and the Seaway Car Wash while three spaces have been added on the west side of Ben Franklin at the Center Island (see Sheets C-2, C-3 and C-4). 8. The City of Burlington is currently evaluating the proposed improvements to the existing lights and turning lane at the Home Avenue/Shelburne Street/O'Dell Parkway intersection. We anticipate that a letter of agreement from the City will be forthcoming prior to the public hearing. 9. We have included a construction cost estimate for the work to be completed within the proposed right-of-way. A bond will be posed (in an amount to be approved by the City Engineer) prior to the issuance of a zoning/building permit for the project. 10. The applicant agrees to the condition that he be responsible for maintaining the new roadway until it is accepted by the City. 11. The applicant will pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 12. Sheet C-2 has been revised to show additional landscaping to be installed along the north property to better screen the PCD property from the residential properties. The void in the existing double line of arborvitaes will be filled with 14 new arborvitaes. Two hundred new rosa multi -flora and a chest high rose bush will be planted along the Mr. Ray Belair Page 4 May 6, 1993 south side of the line of arborvitaes. On the south side of the rosa multi -flora, 15 new weeping willows will be planted. This species was chosen for its fast growing characteristics, hydrophobic nature, and high rate of evapotranspiration (high rate of removing water from the ground to potentially create a drier area). 13. In accordance with Section 204.2 of the Subdivision Regulations under which planned unit developments are reviewed, we hereby request that a public hearing be scheduled within 21 days of this submission of the final plat to the administrative officer. Other Issues We have provided a revised cost estimate for all of the proposed improvements that are part of this project. With this we have revised the required landscaping requirements and have provided a breakdown of proposed landscaping costs for your review. 2. We have included our drainage calculations for the proposed drainage system for review by Bill Szymanski. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 985-2323 or James Lamphere at 655-5020. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, ILI C'/Z11)1t�1)_'__ �n David S. Marshall Project Engineer DSM:pao Enclosures cc: J. Lamphere City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 1, 1993 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects 30 Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans no later than Friday, June 11, 1993. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincergly, " ,6 R&J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp cc: David Marshall CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT David M. Farrell & Stuart H. McConaughy, Trustees, 1 ) Name of Applicants U/T/A March 4, 1977, Thomas A. Farrell, Doner; Farrell Corporation; and David M. Farrell 2) Name Of acxw PCD: O'Dell Park 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application The name of the Applicant has changed to include all property owners and trustees for the late Thomas Farrell. 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: The southwesterly R.O.W. line of O'Dell Park was modified to provide additional area for the new divisional island. 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and containing all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regui tions for a minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for major ubd ' vision . 6-17 1,9 -� (Signature) appli ant or contact person Date City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7955 � 658-7958 May 25, 1993 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: Enclosed please find a copy of the April 27, 1993 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S n ere1 , J Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: David Marshall City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLING TON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 17, 1993 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the April 13, 1993 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i erely, JF Weith, city Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: David Marshall ., �. .. �, ,.... .. .,... •1W •ei, h taw:; s. .. .. ., M.` . ...•..;. PLANNING COMMISSION 13 April 1993 page 3 A. The applicant shall record the final plat plans in the land records within 90 da s or this approval is null and void: The Tans shall be si ned b the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recordin the plans. 5. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occucyf_rom the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the new addition. 6. An_y chan ec� s to the final plat plans_ shall reguirZ_approval by the Plannin Commission. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motionpassed unanimousl 5. Request of Skip Vallee to construct a single family house off Spear Street in an area of the Southeast Quadrant designated as restricted area, in accordance with Section 26.501(g) of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations: Mr. Vock said the property is 28 acres, with 17 of them in Shel- burne and the remaining in S. Burlington. Mrs. Maher asked the distance of the proposed house from the Velco line. Mr. Vock said it is approximately 400 feet. No other issues were raised. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve Wthe Wrequest �of Skip_Vallee to construct a single-family house in an area of the Southeast Quadrant District desi nated as_restricted _area as de- picted on a plan entitled "Vallee Farm_Sub_division Parcel #1 prepared by Civil En ineerinq Associates-, Inc, and dated 10/24/ 91, last revised 10/30/92. It is the Commission_'s opinion that the proposed pro'ect meets the requirements ofWSections 25.501( and 26.606 ofWthe WSouth �Burlinqton-Zoning-Regulations. Mrs. Maher seconded. The motion then passed unanimousl . 6. Preliminary Plat application of Thomas Farrell for a planned commercial development consisting of a new bank building with drive-thru service, existing car wash, existing office building, existing restaurant/bar building and leased parking for the ad- joining Ben.Franklin business, Shelburne Road: Mr. Sheahan expressed concern that the Commission had just been handed the traffic report and has not had a chance to review it. He said he would not want to make a decision without such a re- view. Other Commission members agreed. Mr. Webster then presented the plan. The land is owned by 3 en- tities but will be put together as one entity. There is frontage on Hadley Rd, Farrell St, two frontages on Shelburne St. There .•,Y:Y•..xx>o.•q.r.r•xrii{Krs:Sra.v<.k, +:. _. >,.,�?sH„vo,Nz-afY�sC�x:..-:.v ,.,.r.�.Ar;K24`�7it<:a;'r!}i!+h..22T.'tiriTir,hh'r;r+Yzrb..x7: '� '� PLANNING COMMISSION 13 April 1993 page 4 are currently 4 major buildings on the site: Ben Franklin, the car wash, the radio station, and Bambino's. They will add a small branch bank. The right-of-way has been shown to the width reuested by the Commission. There is a agreement with abutting owner for dedication of land so when the city wants O'Dell Parkway, it can go all the way through to Farrell St. There is also an 8 ft. wide bike path integrated with the road which will be built to city standards. The have removed all parking in the area just south of the entry and have organized parking. Concerns about stacking for the carwash have also been addressed. Mr. Webster then showed the location of curb cuts off O'Dell Parkway. There is an 8 ft. fence which will be moved back. Mr. Webster showed the area for future parking when the agreement to park on Factory Outlet property expires. He said he feels there is an ability to share parking with adjacent property because of the different hours of operation. Mr. Weith noted there had been discussion of beefing up screening for the residential area. Ms. Peacock suggested some willows as it is very wet back there. Mr. Carroll noted there is a considerabe loss of parking in front of Ben Franklin with this plan. Mr. Sheahan questions whether parking is adequate. Mr. Austin asked to see which spaces are required for Ben Franklin. Members counted 86, including the Seaway spaces. Mr. Sheahan asked if the access to the Citgo Station remains. Mr. Webster said it has to by deed. Mr. Openlander then presented the traffic report. He said they were asked in the fall to look at the intersection of Home Ave, Shelburne Rd, and O'Dell Parkway. They did a trip generation study of the Chittenden Bank and traffic counts in November. This allowed they to do a trip generation rate. Adjustments were made for non -mall traffic. Referring to Table 6, Mr. Openlander noted a "D" level of service at the intersection. Mr. Craig noted they will be going from "D" to E" at the southern approach. Mr. Openlander said they were trying to minimize the queue length not optimize performance. Mr.Austin asked if they took into account the additional drive -up lane at the bank. Mr. Openlander said the most cars at the drive -up was 3. They will be replacing the ATM walk-in with an ATM drive-in. Mr. Austin felt that with 3 drive -up lanes, there should be higher trip generations. It was noted there were originally 2 drive -up lanes and a walk-up ATM. � .a...+.yY. `.ww.:, �.?�Yk2Wyt.,�Wu�. �-. .i .`rd:�`" v`w -;'•,Y3Sk�i�h'.+3'+t+is"t+,l',','d '3�+t1s'k+3,� , tis., .;+ nxtc+,rs.>:,wt. ,,,>,.o � � c. �,.»rKHEMls* PLANNING COMMISSION 13 April 1993 page 5 Mr, Weith expressed the need to give Regional Planning a chance to study the traffic analysis. He noted that Table 3 shows one t. movement (southern approach) going from "D" to "E" when the bank is there in 1998. It is a policy of the city to keep move- ment on arterials at "D" or better. Also, the queue lengths for two movements seem longer than available stacking space. He asked what impact the changing of timing on the signals will have on the Factory Outlet Mall. He was also concerned with stacking affecting the Ben Franklin curb cut. Mr. Openlander said they did not assume co-ordination with the Factory Outlet and Seaway for the 1993 analysis. Mr. Craig said he would have to see the Home/O'Dell, Shelburne Rd. intersection returned to a "D" level of service. Mr. Open- lander felt this can be done but it would jeopardize queueing on Shelburne St. Other issues were then considered. Mr. Sheahan asked if the location of the bike path has been approved. Mr. Weith said it has. Mrs. Maher asked if the caliper of trees will be increased to meet the landscaping requirements. The applicant said they would. Mr. Weith said a barrier will be needed in front of Ben Franklin to keep bumpers from overhanging onto the sidewalk. Mr. Schuele asked about drainage of the wetland. Mr. Marshall said they will redirect drainage into the Burlington system via an easement. Susan Pritchard, a resident of the area, asked if there are plans to open O'Dell Parkway through the Farrell St. She said the residents hope there isn't a plan to dump traffic onto Farrell St. Mr Burgess said the Commission has no plans to open the street all the way through and didn't believe the city does either. Mr. Weith noted the Official City Map shows a street all the way through. There are no plans for this now. There would have to be studies to determine the impact before any action occurs. Regarding additional trees, Ms. Pritchard noted there used to be a lot of woods there which the applicant cut down one day. She asked if it is possible to get some of that replaced. Mrs. Maher noted it is not on this property. Mr. Lamoureux, representing Heathcote (Factory Outlet Mall), said they are pleased that several issues have been addressed: the PLANNING COMMISSION 13 April 1993 page 6 public street, the 2-way access near the present bank. He said they generally agree with traffic counts. One concern is that there are some trees at the intersection of the frontage road and O'Dell that might obstruct site lines. They still disagree with a 2-way bike lane on the south side of O'Dell because they feel it is not safe. Regarding the Citgo curb cut, Mr. Lamoureus said they have seen Ben Franklin traffic using this as a short cut and feel it is a safety hazard. Mr. Collins, also representing Heathcote, noted the triangular piece now shown as landscaping is actually a deeded right-of-way. Mr. Craig said that is a problem between Heathcote and Farrell. Mr Heilmann said they don't agree this is a right-of-way for vehicle access back and forth. Regarding the timing of when the city takes over O'Dell Parkway, Mr. Weith said if the city takes it over immediately, a turn- around will be needed; otherwise, the applicant will maintain it. Regarding street lighting on O'Dell, there will be require- ment for a type of light that can be maintained by Green Mountain Power. Mr. Marshall said they are looking into that. Mrs. Maher then moved to continue the a lication until 27 A ril. Mr. Austin seconded. Motion passed unanimously-_ 6. Site plan application of Chittenden Bank to relocate a 900 sq. ft. drive -up canopy and construct a 200 sq. ft. entrance vesti- bule, Dorset Street: Mr. Lindberg explained that the changes are needed because o` the widening of Dorset St. which has affected -t.he site. They will need an access to the drive -up facility which crosses in front of the bank, and they also have to change the location of the drive - up windows to provide for stacking space. The curb cut previous- ly used for access to the drive -up windows will be closed. Mr. Teesson commented on the tightness of the parking lot. Mr. Sheahan said he would like to see the screening in the north- east corner as recommended by staff. Other members agreed. Mr. Bishop said they can provide this if it doesn't interfere with what the state does as part of the Dorset St. project. Mrs. Maher noted the Fire Chief has requested a hydrant at the entrance. Mr. Bishop said this project is not being done at their intitiative, and they are having discussion with staff, the City Council, etc., on this to try to get compensation for the work they have - to do. Mr. Weith said he wasn't sure where the closest hydrant will be as part of the Dorset St. project. Members didn't feel strongly about requiring it. 1 i .,..e�;:�:.�ir3uii,vld,2E:;vle.awt.r_:Jxdv+.� sar• -�` "a .n..v..,s2 -z_.�. e_�-� .: ., .�'.. 1 M/1TTAAT f%V P nnRr%%YTT a-av .a i. vas yr a-ar r v ♦ A -A" FARRELL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Preliminary Plat application of Thomas Farrell for a planned commercial development consisting of a new 2,260 square foot bank with drive -through service, existing car wash, existing office building, existing restaurant/bar building, and leased parking for the adjoining Ben Franklin business as depicted on a four (4) page set of plans, page one entitled "Survey Plan, O'Dell Park PCD", prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. and dated 2/93, last revised 4/l/93 with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approvals and stipulations affecting the subject property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in of fort 2. All proposed and existing exterior site lighting shall be appropriately shielded or--po ,nted, so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in existing lighting or new lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 3. The final plat plans shall include a road typical section and storm sewer typical. 4. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit, the applicant shall post a landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value of proposed street trees and site landscaping. The bond shall remain if effect for three (3) years to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. The amount of the bond shall be determined at final plat. 5. Legal documents tor the proposed public street r.o.w. (i.e., irrevocable offer of dedication) and easements (e.g., drainage PaGement-) -hall be submitted to City Attorney for approval and shall be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to issuance of zoning/building permit for the new bank building. 6. Prior to recording the final plat plans, a "Notice of Condition" shall be recorded in the land records which identifies this entire development as a planned commercial development (PCD) and which legally ties all the lots in this development into one PCD for all planning, zoning and subdivision purposes. 7. Prior to final plat submittal, the plans shall be revised to show the following: a) minimum 7 1/7 inch r�lirnr ctrnct tr�r- ... � �.ui.). �.i r114C: �1 ♦.vi ri, vt:�✓`u of �..c 1C.allV.7 1. U�11llli .i �JC l±1CD . c) the existing cedar hedge along the residential properties to the north shall be correctly shown. d) a street lighting fixture that will be maintained by GMP. e) note identifying vacuum stations for car wash. f) consistent fire hydrant symbol on all plans. g) correct spelling of abutter "Reyes" on all plans that abutter names appear. h) appropriate barrier between parking spaces and public sidewalk. i) depressed curb across far easterly access to Bambino's. j ) minimum -12-----f-o6-t—h gIV-stockade.`- of. WVNY instead of the proposed 8 foot --high fence. J ,lie') additional parking spaces located near the Seaway Car Wash sand Ben Frankilin. to 8. Prior to final plat, the applicant shall submit the traffic analysis to the City of Burlington for review and comment. In addition, the applicant shall evaluate the feasibility of increasing the length of the southbound left -turn lane to adequately accommodate anticipated left -turn ques. Prior to final plat, the applccant shall submit a letter from the City of Burlington approving the proposed changes in signal timing and any improvements to increase the southbound left -turn stacking lane. 9. A bond for all improvements within the future street r.o.w. (i.e., street contruction, sidewalks, storm sewer, etc) shall be posted prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new street until such time as the street and r.o.w. is accepted and taken over by the City. 11. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 120 gpd for the new bank building. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 12. T "good; side"ref he stockade fence shall -?be required to � ac £he adley' Ro d properties acid ,, he northerly side of,the nro A l l.�fia 1 i nAri�f at A g1i Gi Anr-� of R foot frr�m h-- f__ with re5w of cedars at least to lU feet in height, with individual trees at intervals" not more than 8 feet. The row of cedars shall be shown bn sheetC-2. Sheet C-2 shall be revised prior to final plat submittal to 1 p;• '1 show additional landscaping to better screen this development from the Hadley Road properties. Rt-.a-minimum, the- -addltlenal landscaping shall consist of the following: A Two additional rows of cedar trees at least six feet in _,�,, A, tea. ,.,1 .. �.. b1r�...-l.r of �hn �naf'P }'fP- nni :>�haii uc rim.. ..c.. �...... �.�-_. .. �._ - _ tween Kochman and Pearson, ,xn order to /OF inue -the dout,le line of cedars in place at successive intervals f four feet from the Had- ley Road residences` rear, property,. I' es. (This is in addition to pxesery ion of the.existing_,ko oE.�cedars which sits on -'the extension of the ,rear., line of- th _ alley Road residences between Kochman and Pearson.) Q-Q. Within the spa� behind the Hadley Road properties, five more rows of mix evergreens and hardwoods not less than, eight to ten feet in height (and with individual trees in a row standing at intervals of not more than ten feet from each other), shall be required to be planted at successive twenty -foot inter- vals from the rear line of the Hadley Road properties, with the southerly -most row 100 feet from the rear line of the Hadley Road properties, and running the full distance from Twin Oaks ("n/f Bur- lington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc.") to "N/F W. Wolfe," as shown:_„ on the proposed plan. t-W. High shrubbery, sufficiently deep, wide, and fast-growing to'x competely shield the satellite dishes .behind WVNY from the view,of: the Hadley Road residences within two years, shall be required to b-t cen the Latel l ; tc. Ai CheS �nrl the rear line Of the Hadley Road propertiesa at- a distanc43of approximately fifteen,_ ,_:_�._ feet from the base of the northerly -most, satellite dish. 14. The applicant shall submit the final plat application within 12 months or this approval is null and void. (mo-f) HrX-12-S3 MON 14:b8 HEILMANN EKMAN ASSOC FAX NO 8028644659 P,01 I 1 LAW OFFICES HmMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 NE GIDEON KING HOUSE 35 KING STREET F. O. Bo)( 21G BUWNGTON, vkRMONT 05402 0216 TELEPHONE (8V2) gua'a555 TFtOhiAS F. h0MANN FAX M (802) BG'i IG5U CHF:15TOPHER D. E"BAN 1� 51GLEF nUHLIF. SCOTT Z„RJUTT. AK TOOD D. 5CHLOSMEILC April 12, 1993 FAC 11K LE TRAriSM #658-4748 Mr. Raymond Belair Assistant City planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION OF 'THOMAS FARRELL" Dear Ray: As we have discussed, the above application which is scheduled as No. 6 on the agenda for Tuesday, April 13, 1991, is a planned commercial development ("PCD") in the City of South Burlington. Although it has been referenced as such in the names of the owners set forth in the application, this letter will confirm that the official applicants are: (a) Farrell Corporation, ( ) David Farrell and (v) David M. Farrell and Stuart F. McConaughy, Trustees, U/T/A March 4, 1977, Thomas A. Farrell, Donor. I would appreciate it if you would make sure that all of the further warnings in this matter, together with permits identified issued, make reference to the three property owners above. Thank you very much. Very truly yours, Thomas F. Heilmann TFH:lkm cc: James Lamphere (via facsimile) Dave Marshall (via .facsimile) farrell y�z7/y3 �c ��/l J 2),4vls S "V e C c:::7 T77K �Rvl S 50/,2 ( )l E`l li") T ®. X�2� s A'(, eMr- �s Pry Y-T P s�A APB' 24 '94 02:17PM VHFA 802 8E4 574E P.1i2 1 E F. L. KOCHMAN, INC. Law Offices One Burlington Square Burlington, Vermont 05401 (802) 864-5746 FAX ( 802 ) 864-7771 PHONE DATE: 4/24/93 (SATURDA'Y') TO: Inc• 1AT7Tm11, CITY PLANNF'R CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON FAX NO: 658-4748 FROM: FRANK KOCHMAN DOCUMENT CONSISTS OF two PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET. REMARKS: Joe -- In connection with FARRELL BANK BUILDING APPLICATION -- enclosed please find a "Requested Conditions of any Approval..." to be SUBSTITUTED for the one I sent you yesterday, This one properly says "southerly" and "northerly" in those places where chF original one er- roneously said "easterly" and "westerly." That's the only change. Hope to see you Tuesday night. PLEASE CONFIRM RECEIPT BY CALLING SENDER AT (802) 864-7771. 1 APR 24 '94 02:17PN VHFH e02 e64 5746 P.2%2 i 1 REQUESTED CONDITIONS OF ANY APPROVAL"__'r'OR APPLICATION PERTAINING TO SITE PLAN REVIQ' r1F FARRF+.T_1__ ETC.. PLANK= COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTOF NEW BANK BUILDING AT O' DELI. PAMAY 1. The existing cedar trees running along the extension of the rear line of the Hadley Road properties brAwgEn Kcclonsn and Pearson shall be drawn on the "Site and Landscaping plan O'Dell Park PCD" (the "Plan") or shall be deemed drawn onto it. 2. The required height of the stockade fence along the northerly edge of the new parking spaces behind Bambino's shall be twelve feet. 3. The "goal side" of th(, stockade fence shall be required to face the Hadley Road properties and the northerly sidE of the fence shall be lined (at a distance of eight feet from the fence) with a row of cedars at least eight to ten feet in height, with individual trees at intr- als of not more than eight feet. 4. Additional landscaping and Buffering is required as follows: A. A buffer yard of green space shall be required to extend not less than two hundred feet southerly from the near line of the Had- ley Road properties and its extension berwean Griggs and Pearson. c� ` H_ Two additional rows of cedar trees at least six feet in height shall be planted immediately Goutherly of the space be- tween Kochman and Pearson, in order to continue the double line of cedars in place at successive intervals of four feet from the Had- ley Road residences' rear property lines. (This is in addition to preservation of the existing row of cedars which sits on the extension of the rear line of the :a%dl.ey Road residences between Kochman and Pearson.) C. Within the buffer space behind the Hadley Road properties, five more rows of mixed evergreens and hardwoods not less than eight to ten feet in height (and with individual trees in a row standing at intervals of not more than ten feet from each other) shall be required to be planted at successive twenty --foot inter- vals from the rear line of the Hadley Road properties, with the southerly -most row 100 feet from the rear line of the Hadley Road properties, and running the full distance from Twin Oaks ("n/f Bur- lington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc.") to "N/F W. Wolfe," as shown on the proposed plan. D. High shrubbery, sufficiently deep, wide, and fast-growing to competely shield the satellite dishes behind W-MY from the view of the Hadley Road residences within two years, shall be required to be interposed between the satellite dishes and the rear line of the Hadley Road properties at a distance of approximately fifteen feet from the base of the northerly -most satellite dish. r We I TH TRANS/OP INC. P.O. Box 29, Route 2A Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 878-5977 April 9, 1993 Mr. David Marshall, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Falls Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Dear Mr. Marshall: Because the banking facilities are proposed to be revised in the vicinity of Factory Outlet in South Burlington, Vermont, turning movement counts at the intersection of Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue and trip generation counts at Chittenden Bank were recorded during the afternoon peak period on Friday, November 20, 1992. The existing bank is to become a walk-in facility with a walk-in ATM, while the new walk-in bank is designed to serve customers with one drive-in ATM and two drive-in windows. Trip generation rates by banking activity were developed for this land -use location. Bank data that are indicative of the Friday before Thanksgiving are reasonable estimates of design hour conditions. Expansion volumes for the proposed levels of bank development are listed in Table 1 for the study site. In addition, pertinent factors for traffic adjustments are noted on this tabular summary. Because the proportion of mixed -use trips could not be ascertained during the counts at Chittendeh Bank, a published average value of 17 percent was 'gned to this component of trip generation. A pasY for1 ,percent was also selected fore the new Ps on thenon-driveway facilities. Design hour volumes that are equivalent to 30th highest hour volumes during the afternoon peak hour were developed for the intersection of Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue. These data were forecasted to the base year of 1993 and the design year of 1998 for the intersectional performance analyses. Appropriate temporal adjustments and growth factors for non -mall traffic were developed from volume characteristics collected by the Vermont Agency of Transportation at Sta. D099 on I189 in South Burlington. Design hour volumes for the four performance evaluations are presented in the following summaries: 1. 1993 without bank modifications - Table 2; 2. 1993 with bank modifications - Table 3; 3. 1998 without bank modifications - Table 4; and 4. 1998 with bank modifications - Table 5. Complete build -out for the two bank facilities was assumed for both analysis years, and all bank expansion trips were assigned to Odell Parkway. Mr. D. Marshall April 9, 1993 Page 2 Results of the performance evaluations are documented in Table 6 for the signalized intersection of Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue. Except for 1993 without the bank modifications, overall `D' levels of service are available during the afternoon peak hour. Service level `D' is defined for average seconds of delay per vehicle in the range from 25 to 40. The objectives of these analyses were to obtain acceptable levels of service with minimum cycle times and with minimum queue lengths. Comparisons of 90th-percentile queue lengths with available storage distances are provided in Table 7 for the study intersection. Although `F' level of service is noted on Odell Parkway in 1998 with the bank modifications, adequate storage lengths exist on this approach. With a revised signal plan, the performance can be improved to service level `E' during the design afternoon peak hour in 1998 with an increase in the maximum storage requirement from 129 to 172 ft. However, the overall traffic performance remains at `D' level of service with an average delay of 34.0 spv for this location. In summary, reasonable performance conditions are available for travel through the study intersection during the afternoon peak hour without and with the proposed bank modifications in the vicinity of Factory Outlet. Please advise of any additional information that may be required. Very truly yours, <�C.&,.,, Joseph C. Oppenlander, P.E. Vice -President JCO:njk Enclosure ' 3 TABLE 1 EXPANSION TRAFFIC Banks at Factory Outlet South Burlington, Vermont Size Development Traffic, Afternoon Peak Hour (sq ft) (vph) Enter Exit I bT-A'L Existing - 1400 -34 -38 Proposed - 2000 150 170 Change 116 132 Traffic Adjustments: 1. Mixed -use - 17%�- 2. Passby - 14% c� 3. Allocation to Odell Parkway - 100% �t- � � �? - ya _ 5 '� =93� El P Table 2 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Shelburne Road, Odett Parkway, and Home Avenue Westbound 0 330 --------------------- 0 left 43 0 0 Thru Eastbound 456 50 0 Right 363 West Approach Home Avenue North Approach - Shelburne Road Southbound Northbound 0 0 1227 1303 0 0 0 12 1050 165 Right Thru Left 0 1486 Southbound 1993 Design Hour Volumes Without Bank Expansion Right 0 128 Thru 0 0 63 264 Left 0 73 ------------------- 0 243 East Approach Odetl Parkway Left Thru Right 0 0 0 255 1132 28 0 1415 Northbound South Approach - Shelburne Road Westbound Eastbound Vehicles per hour by movement a.m. peak hour over p.m, peak hour a.m. p.m. - 1630-1730 ��'_�...._.._..__...,....,.-.,..... _. _..... .:.,.,._s�..�.as.wwva.xrwa:�r5.�a�uia..+u�aasa-..,.........-_�.k.....;:.. ....v,�..,.,.A7i ___-•_,��.,� �-._, ,.. .. W �,,, S Table 3 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue Westbound 0 354 --------------------- 0 Left 43 0 0 Thru Eastbound 474 70 0 Right 361 West Approach Home Avenue North Approach - Shelburne Road Southbound ( Northbound 0 0 S 1286 I 1352 0 0 0 12 1044 230 Right Thru Left 0 1509 Southbound 1993 Design Hour Volumes With All Bank Expansion at Odell Parkway Right 0 181 Thru 0 0 89 374 Left 0 104 ------------------- 0 339 East Approach Odell Parkway Left Thru Right 0 0 0 253 1128 39 0 1420 Northbound South Approach - Shelburne Road Westbound //DO Eastbound Vehicles per hour by movement a.m. peak hour over �y pe p.m. peak hour a.m. p.m. - 1630-1730 a Table 4 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue Westbound 0 360 --------------------- 0 Left 48 0 0 Thru Eastbound 500 50 0 Right 402 West Approach Home Avenue North Approach - Shelburne Road G Southbound Northbound 0 0 1341 1429 0 0 0 14 1162 165 Right Thru Left 0 1637 Southbound 1998 Design Hour Volumes Without Bank Expansion Right 0 128 Thru 0 0 63 264 Left 0 73 ------------------- 0 243 East Approach Odell Parkway Left Thru Right 0 0 0 283 1253 28 0 1564 Northbound South Approach - Shelburne Road Westbound Eastbound Vehicles per hour by movement a.m. peak hour over p.m. peak hour a.m. p.m. - 1630-1730 7 Table 5 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Hone Avenue 1998 Design Hour Volumes With All Bank Expansion at Odell Parkway North Approach _ Shelburne Road Southbound ( Northbound 0 0 1400 f 1478 0 0 0 14 1156 230 Right Thru Left Right 0 181 Thru 0 0 Westbound 89 374 Westbound 0 384 Left 0 104 ------------------- 0 Left 0 Eastbound 48 339 0 0 Thru East Approach Eastbound 518 70 Odell Parkway 0 Right 400 West Approach Hone Avenue Left Thru Right 0 0 0 281 1249 39 0 0 1660 1569 Southbound Northbound South Approach - Shelburne Road Vehicles per hour by movement a.m. peak hour over p.m. peak hour a.m. p.m. - 1630-1730 Ey TABLE 6 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and South Burlington,Vermont Home Avenue Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With* Without With* 1993 DHV (1630 - 1730) Shelburne Rd. - North App. 19.7 24.7 C C Shelburne Rd. - South App. 28.1 39.2 D D Odell Pky. - East App. 13.9 22.8 B C Home Ave. - West App. 7.8 7.7 B B Intersection 21,2 28.0 C D. 1998 DHV (1630 - 1730) Shelburne Rd. - North App. 19.2 25.4 C D Shelburne Rd. - South App. 26.1 44.7 D Odell Pky. - East App. 98.6 93.2 Home Ave. - West App. 11.2 9.7 B Intersection 26.8 37.7 D D * With all bank expansion at Odell Parkway. TABLE 7 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway and Home Avenue Approach Lane South Burlington, Vermont j, 90-P'Queue Storage (ft) (ft) Without With Full Width Taper 1993 DHV North App. TR 299 304 L 114 161 South App. TR 326 336 L 176 177 East App. R 49 68 LT 80 110 West App. R 142 136 LT 55 65 1998 DHV North App. TR 415 L 146 South App. TR 452 L 251 East App. R 67 LT 110 West App. R 213 LT 80 V'4 c�rLCQ % !A"J . / 500+ - 85 109 269 - 94 74 140 - 140 - 500+ - 105 35 380 500+ - 185 85 109 418 269 - 22 94 74 80 140 - 129 140 - 178 500+ - 79 105 35 TRANS/OP INC. P.O. Box 29, Route 2A Williston, Vermont 05495 April 14, 1993 %1R02) 878.5977 Mr. David Marshall, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Falls Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Dear Mr. Marshall: In the performance evaluation for 1998 travel demands with the proposed bank modifications, `E' level of service by just 4.7 spv was reported for the south approach of the intersection of Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue. To improve this situation, the two left -turn lanes on Shelburne Road were changed from protected to protected -permitted operation. This type of signal operation is sometimes selected to improve traffic conditions. The resulting intersection performance summary and 90th-percentile queue lengths are presented in Tables 6A and 7A, respectively, for 1998 design hour volumes with bank modifications in place. The other three analysis situations were not reassessed and remain unchanged in the tabulated summaries. In Table 6A, service levels `D' or better are noted for the design - year volumes with the changes for the two banking facilities. Although storage lengths are not fully adequate for 1993 and 1998 demand volumes without any bank alterations, improvements do result from the changed mode of signal operation at this intersection. Please advise of any additional concerns that may arise. Very truly yours, Joseph C. Oppenlander, P.E. Vice -President JCO:njk Enclosure TABLE 6A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and South Burlington,Vermont Home Avenue Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With* Without With* 1998 DHV (1630 - 1730) Shelburne Rd. - North App. 19.2 21.4 05•Y C (' C Shelburne Rd. - South App. 26.1 36.5 Yq-7 D D Odell Pky. - East App. 98.6 22.2 93.Z F C Home Ave. - West App. 11.2 8.7 �.7 B B Intersection 26.8 25.9 D D * With all bank expansion at Odell Parkway. TABLE 7A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway and Home Avenue South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane 90-P Queue Storage (ft) (ft) Without With Full Width Taper 1998 DHV µ Se 0� W U Vj' �, 1 � North App. TR 415 3 9 90 50+ - L 146 %185 /gs 85 109 South App. TR 452 �384 �14' 269 - L 251 226 ZXl/ 94 74 East App. R 67 77 g0 140 - LT 110 113 12 % 140 - West App. R 213 171 178�' 500+ - LT 80 69 7q 105 35 S� 71�A✓lam/" /i��Ml �� . / rJ w�_ r-- Vrkoo-lg& a0e le ,op Kn At ?e r -- --- ----- 41Mk C, 7 -low- ltl"o4o- S"- 7-wo - r � yN� 15 whs o-- TRANS/OP INC. P.O. Box 29, Route 2A Williston, Vermont 05495 April 14, 1993 (802) 878-5977 Mr. David Marshall, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Falls Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Dear Mr. Marshall: In the performance evaluation for 1998 travel demands with the proposed bank modifications, `El level of service by just 4.7 spv was reported for the south approach of the intersection of Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue. To improve this situation, the two left -turn lanes on Shelburne Road were changed from protected to protected -permitted operation. This type of signal operation is sometimes selected to improve traffic conditions. The resulting intersection performance summary and 90th-percentile queue lengths are presented in Tables 6A and 7A, respectively, for 1998 design hour volumes with bank modifications in place. The other three analysis situations were not reassessed and remain unchanged in the tabulated summaries. In Table 6A, service levels `D' or better are noted for the design - year volumes with the changes for the two banking facilities. Although storage lengths are not fully adequate for 1993 and 1998 demand volumes without any bank alterations, improvements do result from the changed mode of signal operation at this intersection. Please advise of any additional concerns that may arise. Very truly yours, Joseph C. Oppenlander, P.E. Vice -President JCO:njk Enclosure TABLE 6A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and South Burlington,Vermorit Home Avenue Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With* Without With* 1998 DHV (1630 - 1730) Shelburne Rd. - North App. 19.2 21.4 C C Shelburne Rd. - South App. 26.1 36.5 D p Odell Pky. - East App. 98.6 22.2 F C Home Ave. - West App. 11.2 8.7 B B Intersection 26.8 25.9 D D * With all bank expansion at Odell Parkway. I TABLE 7A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway and Home Avenue South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane 90-P Queue Storage (ft) (ft) Without With Full Width Taper 1998 DHV North App. TR 415 349 500+ - L 146 185 85 109 South App. TR 452 384 269 - L 251 226 94 74 East App. R 67 77 140 - LT 110 113 140 - West App. R 213 171 500+ - LT 80 69 105 35 G c5h D� a� r2 .LJ' 1 o .� e c,� ~wvz 4zC a MOTION OF APPROVAL FARRELL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Preliminary Plat application of Thomas Farrell for a planned commercial development consisting of a new 2,260 square foot bank with drive -through service, existing car wash, existing office building, existing restaurant/bar building, and leased parking for the adjoining Ben Franklin business as depicted on a four (4) page set of plans, page one entitled "Survey Plan, O'Dell Park PCD", prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. and dated 2/93, last revised 4/l/93 with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approvals and stipulations affecting the subject property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. All proposed and existing exterior site lighting shall be appropriately shielded or pointed so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in existing lighting or new lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 3. The final plat plans shall include a road typical section and :storm sewer typical. 4. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit, the applicant shall post a landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value of proposed street trees and site landscaping. The bond shall remain if effect for three (3) years to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. The amount of the bond shall be determined at final plat. 5. Legal documents for the proposed public street r.o.w. (i.e., irrevocable offer of dedication) and easements (e.g., drainage easement) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and shall be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to issuance of zoning/building permit for the new bank building. 6. Prior to recording the final plat plans, a "Notice of Condition" shall be recorded in the land records which identifies this entire development as a planned commercial development (PCD) and which legally ties all the lots in this development into one PCD for all planning, zoning and subdivision purposes. 7. Prior to final plat submittal, the plans shall be revised to show the following: a) minimum 2 1/2 inch caliper street trees and larger species for site landscaping to make up the shortfall in required site landscaping value. b) a street lighting fixture that will be maintained by GMP. c) note identifying vacuum stations for car wash. d) consistent fire hydrant symbol on all plans. e) correct spelling of abutter "Reyes" on all plans that abutter names appear. f) appropriate barrier between parking spaces and public sidewalk. g) depressed curb across far easterly access to Bambino's. h) turn -around ? B. A bond for all improvements within the future street r.o.w. (i.e., street contruction, sidewalks, storm sewer, etc) shall be posted prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. 9. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new street until such time as the street and r.o.w. is accepted and taken over by the City. 10. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 120 gpd for the new bank building. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 11. The applicant shall submit the final plat application within 12 months or this approval is null and void. (mo-f) Y MOTION OF APPROVAL FARRELL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Preliminary Plat application of Thomas Farrell for a planned commercial development consisting of a new 2,260 square foot bank with drive -through service, existing car wash, existing office building, existing restaurant/bar building, and leased parking for the adjoining Ben Franklin business as depicted on a four (4) page set of plans, page one entitled "Survey Plan, O'Dell Park PCD", prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. and dated 2/93, last revised 4/l/93 with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approvals and stipulations affecting the subject property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. All proposed and existing exterior site lighting shall be appropriately shielded or pointed so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in existing lighting or new lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 3. The final plat plans shall include a road typical section and -.:storm sewer typical. 4. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit, the applicant shall post a landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value of proposed street trees and site landscaping. The bond shall remain if effect for three (3) years to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. The amount of the bond shall be determined at final plat. 5. Legal documents for the proposed public street r.o.w. (i.e., irrevocable offer of dedication) and easements (e.g., drainage easement) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and shall be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to issuance of zoning/building permit for the new bank building. 6. Prior to recording the final plat plans, a "Notice of Condition" shall be recorded in the land records which identifies this entire development as a planned commercial development (PCD) and which legally ties all the lots in this development into one PCD for all planning, zoning and subdivision purposes. 7. Prior to final plat submittal, the plans shall be revised to show the following: a) minimum 2 1/2 inch caliper street trees and larger species for site landscaping to make up the shortfall in required site landscaping value. b) a street lighting fixture that will be maintained by GMP. c) note identifying vacuum stations for car wash. d) consistent fire hydrant symbol on all plans. e) correct spelling of abutter "Reyes" on all plans that abutter names appear. f) appropriate barrier between parking spaces and public sidewalk. g) depressed curb across far easterly access to Bambino's. h) turn -around ? 8. A bond for all improvements within the future street r.o.w. (i.e., street contruction, sidewalks, storm sewer, etc) shall be posted prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. 9. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new street until such time as the street and r.o.w. is accepted and taken over by the City. 10. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 120 gpd for the new bank building. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 11. The applicant shall submit the final plat application within 12 months or this approval is null and void. (mo-f) .-. .- zlJ ID; J)4 'Lcu: 01 M St51U t.C-Kec [&Ohl C3ITTENDEN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORCI'ANIZATION P.O. Box Ina 66 pead heat %sax Junction, Vermont 05453 ($02) 658-3004 April 23, 1993 Mr. Joseph Weith city Planner 575 Dorset Streetl- S. Burlington, VT;05403 near Joe: Post-lt' brand fax transmittal memo 7671 Rjorpayrs . To C e Feom { �7 '> , ice, �� kept. Phone Fix# AIXM I have reviewed the traffic impact analysis performed by TRANIS j OP INC. for the revision and addition of the Chittenden Bank facilities located on Odell Parkway_ All assumptions and analysis procedures seem reasonable. "'y -' concern was for of stopped vehicles at the new drive --in facility. The existing site plan provides for a maximum storage of six vehicles, while ;25•9 aL it-j-a avid Land Development" a facility with three drive-in wi-ndows should be designed for seven q-tzeued veicles. A queuing study performed today at the Chittenden Bank on Dorset Street, shows a maximum queue of three vehicleswhich would seem to satisfy this concern. in conclusion, this development traffic causes no additional - _ ando..c�4,�3 u�iay. The left -Dorn taper length on the north approach should be restripped to provide a full le6-turn storage laiie north to Bacon Street. The performance at this intersection would further be improved if it were progressed along with the rest of the Shelburne Road cotridor, since it was excluded from the initial study_ If you have any questions please call. Sincerely, f 1;9 E_ 11J� Todd E. Landry Transportation Engineer ... ComposeC of... a u ington Colchester Ewes: Essez Junchon tdefon, Shelbume $0, sur!ingwn WiWwWn Mxxmld ris:odtAgtr+cyofTr r4mrtsuon AM TRANS/OP INC. P.O. Box 29, Route 2A Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 878-5977 April 9, 1993 Mr. David Marshall, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Falls Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Dear Mr. Marshall: Because the banking facilities are proposed to be revised in the vicinity of Factory Outlet in South Burlington, Vermont, turning movement counts at the intersection of Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue and trip generation counts at Chittenden Bank were recorded during the afternoon peak period on Friday, November 20, 1992. The existing bank is to become a walk-in facility with a walk-in ATM, while the new walk-in bank is designed to serve customers with one drive-in ATM and two drive-in windows. Trip generation rates by banking activity were developed for this land -use location. Bank data that are indicative of the Friday before Thanksgiving are reasonable estimates of design hour conditions. Expansion volumes for the proposed levels of bank development are listed in Table 1 for the study site. In addition, pertinent factors for traffic adjustments are noted on this tabular summary. Because the proportion of mixed -use trips could not be ascertained during the counts at Chittenden Bank, a published average value of 17 percent was assigned to this component of trip generation. A passby factor of 14 percent was also selected for the new bank trips on the non -driveway facilities. Design hour volumes that are equivalent to 30th highest hour volumes during the afternoon peak hour were developed for the intersection of Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue. These data were forecasted to the base year of 1993 and the design year of 1998 for the intersectional performance analyses. Appropriate temporal adjustments and growth factors for non -mall traffic were developed from volume characteristics collected by the Vermont Agency of Transportation at Sta. D099 on I189 in South Burlington. Design hour volumes for the four performance evaluations are presented in the following summaries: 1. 1993 without bank modifications - Table 2; 2. 1993 with bank modifications - Table 3; 3. 1998 without bank modifications - Table 4; and 4. 1998 with bank modifications - Table 5. Complete build -out for the two bank facilities was assumed for both analysis years, and all bank expansion trips were assigned to Odell Parkway. Mr. D. Marshall April 9, 1993 Page 2 Results of the performance evaluations are documented in Table 6 for the signalized intersection of Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue. Except for 1993 without the bank modifications, overall `D' level-s of service are available during the afternoon peak hour. Service level `D' is defined for average seconds of delay per vehicle in the range from 25 to 40. The objectives of these analyses were to obtain acceptable levels of service with minimum cycle times and with minimum queue lengths. Comparisons of 90th-percentile queue lengths with available storage distances are provided in Table 7 for the study intersection. Although `F' level of service is noted on Odell Parkway in 1998 with the bank modifications, adequate storage lengths exist on this approach. With a revised signal plan, the performance can be improved to service level `E' during the design afternoon peak hour in 1998 with an increase in the maximum storage requirement from 129 to 172 ft. However, the overall traffic performance remains at `D' level of service with an average delay of 34.0 spv for this location. In summary, reasonable performance conditions are available for travel through the study intersection during the afternoon peak hour without and with the proposed bank modifications in the vicinity of Factory Outlet. Please advise of any additional information that may be required. Very truly yours, C. Joseph C. Oppenlander, P.E. Vice -President JCO:njk Enclosure 3 Banks at Factory Outlet size (sq ft) Existing - 1400 Proposed - 2000 Change TABLE 1 EXPANSION TRAFFIC South Burlington, Vermont Development Traffic, Afternoon Peak Hour (vPh) Enter Exit -34 -38 150 170 116 Traffic Adjustments: 1. Mixed -use - 17% 2. Passby - 14% 3. Allocation to Odell Parkway - 100% 132 4 Table 2 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue Westbound 0 330 --------------------- 0 Left 43 0 0 Thru Eastbound 456 50 0 Right 363 West Approach Home Avenue North Approach - Shelburne Road Southbound Northbound 0 0 1227 1303 0 0 0 12 1050 165 Right Thru Left 0 1486 Southbound 1993 Design Hour Volumes Without Bank Expansion Right 0 128 Thru 0 0 63 264 Left 0 73 ------------------- 0 243 East Approach Odell Parkway Left Thru Right 0 0 0 255 1132 28 0 1415 Northbound South Approach - Shelburne Road Westbound Eastbound Vehicles per hour by movement a.m. peak hour over p.m. peak hour a.m. p.m. - 1630-1730 5 Table 3 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue Westbound 0 354 --------------------- 0 Left 43 0 0 Thru Eastbound 474 70 0 Right 361 West Approach Home Avenue North Approach - Shelburne Road Southbound Northbound 0 0 1286 1352 0 0 0 12 1044 230 Right Thru Left 0 1509 Southbound 1993 Design Hour Volumes With ALL Bank Expansion at Odell Parkway Right 0 181 Thru 0 0 89 374 Left 0 104 ------------------- 0 339 Left Thru Right 0 0 0 253 1128 39 0 1420 Northbound South Approach - Shelburne Road East Approach Odell Parkway Westbound Eastbound Vehicles per hour by movement a.m. peak hour over p.m. peak hour a.m. p.m. - 1630-1730 a Table 4 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue 1998 Design Hour Volumes Without Bank Expansion North Approach - Shelburne Road Southbound Northbound 0 0 1341 1429 0 0 0 14 1162 165 Right Thru Left Right 0 128 Thru 0 0 Westbound 63 264 Westbound 0 360 Left 0 --------------------- 73 0 Left 0 Eastbound 48 243 0 0 Thru East Approach Eastbound 500 50 Odell Parkway 0 Right 402 West Approach Home Avenue Left Thru Right 0 0 0 M 1253 28 0 0 1637 1564 Southbound Northbound South Approach - Shelburne Road Vehicles per hour by movement a.m. peak hour over p.m. peak hour a.m. p.m. - 1630-1730 ' ` I Table 5 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue Westbound 0 384 --------------------- 0 Left 48 0 0 Thru Eastbound 518 70 0 Right 400 West Approach Home Avenue North Approach - Shelburne Road Southbound I Northbound 0 I 0 1400 1478 I 0 0 0 14 1156 230 Right Thru Left 0 1660 Southbound 1998 Design Hour Volumes With All Bank Expansion at Odell Parkway Right 0 181 Thru 0 0 89 374 Left 0 104 ------------------- 0 339 East Approach Odell Parkway Left Thru Right 0 0 0 281 1249 39 0 1569 Northbound South Approach - Shelburne Road Westbound Eastbound Vehicles per hour by movement a.m. peak hour over p.m. peak hour a.m. p.m. - 1630-1730 E TABLE 6 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and South Burlington,Vermont Home Avenue Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With* Without With* 1993 DHV (1630 - 1730) Shelburne Rd. - North App. 19.7 24.7 C C Shelburne Rd. - South App. 28.1 39.2 D D Odell Pky. - East App. 13.9 22.8 B C Home Ave. - West App. 7.8 7.7 B B Intersection 21.2 28.0 C D 1998 DHV (1630 - 1730) Shelburne Rd. - North App. 19.2 25.4 C D Shelburne Rd. - South App. 26.1 44.7 D E Odell Pky. - East App. 98.6 93.2 F F Home Ave. - West App. 11.2 9.7 B B Intersection 26.8 37.7 D D * With all bank expansion at Odell Parkway. 4...,,,,a..�,.. ,,, ter.. ,.... �_.,.... ,..-- .......,�.�. TABLE 7 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway and Home Avenue Approach North App. South App. East App. West App. North App. South App. East App. West App. Lane TR L TR L R LT R LT TR L TR L R LT R LT South Burlington, Vermont 90-P Queue Storage (ft) (ft) Without With Full Width Taper 1993 DHV 299 114 326 176 49 80 142 55 1998 DHV 415 146 452 251 67 110 213 80 304 5004- - 161 85 109 336 269 - 177 94 74 68 140 - 110 140 - 136 500+ - 65 105 35 380 500+ - 185 85 109 418 269 - 227 94 74 80 140 - 129 140 - 178 500+ - 79 105 35 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Strdet, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, April 13, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Revised Final Plat application of Landrum for construction of a 15,820 square foot addition to an existing 120,537 square foot building used for manufacturing/printing, Lane Press, Hinesburg Road. 2) Revised Final Plat application of Patricia Calkins to amend a previously approved six (6) lot commercial subdivision, Calkins Court. 3) Preliminary Plat application of Thomas Farrell for a planned commercial development consisting of a new bank building with drive -through service, existing car wash, existing office building, existing restaurant/bar building, and leased parking for the adjoining Ben Franklin business, Shelburne Road. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission March 27, 1993 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 (802) 878-4450 -( AMOUREUX & STONES Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors April 7, 1993 Mr. Joe Weith Planning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Proposed Bank on the Farrell Parcel Shelburne Street, South Burlington, Vermont Dear Joe: 27 High Street St. Albans, Vermont 05478 (802) 524-5245 We have reviewed the traffic report, sheets C-1, C-2 and C-3, and the final plat for the above project on behalf of our client, Heathcote Associates. Please enter this letter as part of the Commission's records. We are pleased that some of the previous issues have been addressed by the applicant. However, there are several remaining concerns that are outlined as follows: 1) The applicant has six curb cuts shown on O'Dell Parkway as presented on plans C-2 and C-3. At the October 13, 1992 Planning Commission meeting, it was stated during the review of the Heathcote sketch plan which presented only four Factory Outlet Mall curb cuts on O'Dell Parkway that 'other members also expressed serious concerns about these curb cuts, noting that if and when O'Dell Parkway becomes a full through street, it would have these additional curb cuts to contend with." Four or five curb cuts in this segment of O'Dell Parkway are not a problem but six may be. 2) The applicant's engineer should address and state whether or not the most easterly curb cut from O'Dell parkway to the Citgo easement and Ben Franklin parking lot is safe as shown on the plans. The Institute of Transportation Engineers text on Transportation and Land Development presents recommended minimum corner clearances. O'Dell Parkway meets the definition of a collector street, therefore, the minimum clearance from Shelburne Street to the Citgo/Ben Franklin access should be 175 feet (see attached Figure 5-24). It also states that "for smaller community centers, a minimum of 120 to 150 feet of storage space should be provided." The South Burlington Zoning Regulations also state in Section 19.103e Driveway and Civil, Environmental & Transportation Engineering • Planning • Land Surveying Mr. Joe Weith April 7, 1993 Page 2 Street Requirements that "driveways shall be located more than 200 feet as measured from signalized street intersections." In any case, since the Citgo/Ben Franklin access is less than 50 feet from Shelburne Street, it should be eliminated as a serious safety problem and surely not accepted by the City in a public street. 3) The following Attachment A is a copy of one of the applicant's plans, where we have added and crosshatched an existing perpetual easement and right-of-way to Heathcote Associates. The other existing businesses in this complex also have a similar easement over O'Dell Parkway. This easement and right-of-way states in part that Heathcote Associates has "full and free right and liberty for Grantee (now Heathcote Assoc.) and such successors and assigns, and its and their tenants, servants, visitors, and licenses, in common with all others now or hereafter having rights therein, with or without vehicles of any description, for all purposes connected with the use and enjoyment of the said land and premises to pass and repass over and across the strip of land described on Schedule A attached hereto for the purpose of ingress and egress from and to Shelburne Street and Farrell Street, together with the right to pave, illuminate, landscape, maintain and improve such easement and right-of-way for such purposes." Not only does this easement and right-of-way state that the Outlet Mall parcel has the rights of ingress and egress, etc., but it goes on to state that Farrell, as original grantor of the easement and right-of-way, can "not materially adversely effect the Grantee's use and enjoyment of the easement and right-of-way granted." Therefore, because the easement and right-of-way deed states that the applicant can not materially adversely affect Heathcote Assoc. and others use and enjoyment of the easement and right-of-way, how can the City consider approval of a plan with a portion of a parking lot, such as that shown on plans C-2 and C-3 just east of Bambino's or even blocking the triangular area between Shelburne Street, O'Dell Parkway and the north line of Heathcote Assoc. or any other obstructions within the existing O'Dell Parkway without approval of Heathcote Assoc. and others? 4) The proposed trees on the south side of O'Dell Parkway near the intersection with the Outlet Mall frontage road should be removed to maintain adequate sight distances. 5) Quoting the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, "Bicycle lanes should always be one-way facilities and carry traffic in the same direction as adjacent motor vehicle traffic. Two-way bicycle lanes on one side of the roadway are unacceptable because they promote riding against the flow of motor vehicle traffic. Mr. Joe Weith April 7, 1993 Page 3 Wrong -way riding is a major cause of bicycle accidents and violates the Rules of the Road stated in the Uniform Vehicle Code." Therefore, a two-way bicycle lane on the south side of O'Dell Parkway should not be permitted. We respectfully request the opportunity to be heard at the upcoming hearing. In the meantime, please contact our firm if there are any questions. Sincerely, Leonard A. Lamoureux, P.E., L.S. cc: Philip Mehler Peter Collins 92084W EI. LL -Z Ul y �v sl tL PERPETUAL EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY SL n) Yi�11Y' FACTORY OUTLET MALL AND OTHERS — t {) �� caJ �►IrNN # I - ' VLIAL2 SOW,, a LAV- ax 49q wa.wlw+ t Q a I I 4 3 -- - r� ��N+a. ��a�tYalawswl . 1 I 1 I I , � I I I I _J 'e�e� cuwlou� q�ewv EA6r't C.WAviNd, pr- r+/r ar.vw a tL' H S I T E AQ Ta wl rs rraw. }Mr( u�yvcr. r teo sj./a,ru 11 4p— f4�M'Y ! waq 10 Alla"cam ofv- KD 4-r- ,paw UGi •.f 19W & � s " 'bI W*mwok- R.c1ev Op"lY K0 r o B> WL w1 slu.c' ptu. nonao vL gyaa ♦ �LCHr .ro City of So. Burlington ATTACHMENT A A B C —� C D E Minimum Corner Clearances* Item Functional Classification of Road Arterial Collector I Local A 230 175 50 B 115 85 50 C 230 175 < 50 D 230 175 50 E 75 0 0 (a) Signalized intersection control F LG —� H J PVK Minimum Corner Clearances* Item Functional Classification of Road Arterial I Collector Local F 115 75 50 G 115 85 50 H 85 85 50 1 115 75 50 K 75 0 0 (b) Stop -sign intersection control Figure 5-24 Minimum comer clearances for urban conditions. In recognition of the difference in volumes and level -of -service requirements for various roadway classes, separate values are suggested for different functional classifications. SOURCE: Adapted from The Traffic Institute, Northwestern University (261. 'The dimensions assume a 30 mph operating speed. For rural and other high-speed roads. clearances of the order of two times as great should be used. 145 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I ' I I I 1 I I i I I I I I a ( a o tt z 1 m m w N I I I I I I I I I r I r rJ HADLEY ROAD R.O.W. N/F I N/F I N/F N/F I N/F I N/F N/F N/F G. k W. I L k L. I B. BARNEY I T. k P. I L.P. BROOKS R. k M. I F, k J. I I W.C. I GRIGGS BROOKS J. KAHAN HASKINS REDFIELD KOCHMAN PEARSON I M. STARKMAI� I I I N/F J k 8 SNYDER I I N/F W. WOLFE I i I f4 I BACON STREET I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I / � lA1EL1E OlIES rn I I �q YU li I C"P I I I �.(1. rANTENNA B STOCKADE FENCE �•Y N/F Li N/F C^j'.I WVNY ' I CHAMPLAIN OIL CO. INC. I A. k R. • ® I REVERS a . 1 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED — — PROPERTY LINE — — — — — — — — — — — - EDGE OF PAVEMENT/CURB SUNKEN CURB .— ........................, SIDEWALK DUMPSTER C TREE O SHRUB FENCE B � NEW SIGN LOCATION IBIIRi leSW�.Ti'. RY FIe011 FBP,IrtI 1. PACES YIIIAHOII ,AO SF . i50 1fRFACE eFAWAY CM WABH A FACE]• 10 SPACES tNrrTVIDEN eANu !URIC IISE 100 SE . 100 YRFACE ♦ SPACES OBIfML LIME 1,11110 SF • 260 ffIYACE 5 a SPACES SEATS See ST . ] SU 133 SPACES GROSS AREA F- 12,1 SI GROS SF-a]e0 IZ13 ISP12.1]1 lx,lsl u . ]oo ulePACE e�mAS TOTAL REGURED mt011ll.G OVeRAPI MT SPACES TOTAL SPACES ♦ AOJACBR PIIM6ITY W SPACES ON AF'rel am r%t jA SPACES 21S TO US WACES II.IaiuP s1.as •CVRAENTLY INS A IeAlOPR1 DE 90 FMROYFES ON SON MOY ]:00 PY TO e:oo rM RRBRG COYRIAGE -MEN -- LOT S I;..t- t 1.Is— RDC. AREA o.13 Ac. RDG. F9ICENTAGC I1.e% e.]% ALLOWED ]O.o% LCT COYETNGE W/ — RIANNLN T]'10.EN FRAF1n1N LOT COv. ARu -1 Ac ael K. LOTCOv 6t.B} ALLOWED TO.Ox SO.1% TO.o% �*io�v e • u u am&—v SOUTH BURLINGTON FACTORY OUTLET CENTER N/F HEATHCOTE ASSOCIATES PHILIP MEHLER REALTY GRAPHIC SCALE ( QL FELT) T l.cb - 50 R. LANDSCAPNG SCHEDULE EQE OLLAMTTY O A DWARF ROYY9ING ALMOND I.6 GK l lFl-ILHFAF IRSIOJ 1.6• CAL A c IaG oA. l.s• ul .� • ME— ANDORA - • G.C. E.W. 1 GAL IS m N/F BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, INC. I 1 1 _____________J I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I C FUTURE I PARK. I �c I I I I 1 I I I I N f �c f 0 I N/F R.M. STEVENS JOY DRIVE NF OLYMPIAD I COURT ASSOCIATES I 0 N/F OLYMPIAD COURT ASSOCIATES / I 1 GARDENS FOR ALL, INC. I f � r � 1 I I 1 / r I WREVOCABLE OFFER OF Tl¢ FROM TOUCH OWI PROPERTIES TO CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON N/F NEW ENTERPRISES, INC. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 23, 1993 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Jim Goddette were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, April 27, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, Encls JW/mcp cc: David Marshall please give e a call. inc rely J e Weith, ty Planner APR 23 194 03:5755PM VHFA 0_02 8E4 557,46 P.1%3 , Post -It' brand `4 nsmittal memo 7671 r of paps ► t 4-1 f,, Frank Kociuuan 75 Hadley Road South Burlington, vT 05403 April 23, 1993 Joe Weith, City planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Farrell proposed plan for new Chittenden Bank building - O'Dell Parkway Dear Joe: Thank you for your opportunity to review the file and to com- ment on the captioned plan before this Tuesday's meeting. As I explained, I received no notice in the mail of the April 13 Plan- ning Commission meeting, and only learned about it in the past few days from the South End News. I want very much to be able to address the Planning Commis- sion at Tuesday night's meeting. I will be out of town on busi- ness from Sunday to Tuesday, with my plane scheduled to arrive back in Burlington at 6:40 Tuesday evening. I hope that if I am a few minutes late to the meeting, any action on the plan can be held off until I get there. When I arrive, I will present photographs that support the requests I am making. Attached are my specific requests' for conditions to be im- posed on any permit issued on the basis of the "Site and Landscap- ing Plan" dated April 1993, last revision April 2, 1993 (added bike path). Here are a few explanatory comments and reminders. 1. As I think the board is aware, the approximately four acres of woods between the Hadley Road properties and what is now Bambino's was totally deforested by the current applicants (or related parites) on Labor Day week -end, 1990. In response to ob- jections from me and other neighbors, the City, through the zoning administrator, at that time negotiated a double row of cedars along a portion of the Hadley Road neighbors' rear line, and suggc;s-ed stror,yly that if and when development of the parcel were sought, substantial re -planting and protection of the neigh- borhood would be a condition. 41thI)IJ3h ^-;y landscaping requests -------------------- 1. :his request is based on the assumption that the board either concludes that it need not make a finding of an extraordinary reason for developing this wet land or that it makes a finding of an extraordi.izary reason. I reserve my overall objection to the application on the grounds that there is no extraordi- nary reason_ to develop the land. APR 23 194 03:55PM VHFA 80P 864 5746 P.2i3 may seem considerable, I hope the Planning Commission will bear in mind that they would have been completely unnecessary at this time if the applicants had left the woods alone in 1990: they could have taken fifty feet for a parking lot now without spend- ing a dime on additional buffer. 2, The plan as submitted actually deletes a line of exist- ing cedar trees currently located along the rear line of the Had- ley Road properties between Kochman and Pearson. h Jache. The ex- isting fence along the westerly edge of its parking lot helps. But with the barrier moved fifty feet closer to my house, the visual protection we have from car lights and the activity in the parking lot will be considerably degraded. (Even where it stands, the existing fence does not to shield us from the lights affixed just below Bambino's roof line.) As my photographs will show, in order to have adequate visual protection, the top line of the fence should be a continuation of the top line of the chain link fPncP Thank you for your consideration. attachment Sin rely, Frank Kochman 2 APR 23 '94 03:55PN VHFA 802 864 5746 P.3i3 REQUESTED CONDITIONS OF ANY APPROVAL FOR APPLICATION PERTAINING TO SITE PLAN REVIEW OF FARR.FLL, ETC., PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF NEW BANK BUILDING AT O'DELL PARKWAY 1. The existing; cedar trees running along the extension of the rear line of the Hadley Road properties between Kochman and Pearson shall be drawn on the "Site and Landscaping Plan O'Dell Park PCD" (the "Plan") or shall be MPamal rlravn nnt-n i t 2. The required height of the stockade fence along the Westerly edge of the new packing spaces behind Bauuhino's shall be twelve feet. 3. The "good side" of the stockade fence shall be rewired to face the Hadley Road properties and the. Westerly side of the fence shall be lined (at a distance of eight feet from the fence) with a row of cedars at least eight to ten feet in height, with individual trees at intervals of not more than eight feet. 4. Addit- inn,al T,and�r;�ninQr anc4 AatfF?rirC-:;uid as follctw:�: A. A buffer yard of green space shall be required to extend not less than two hundred feet easterly from the rear line of the Had- ley Road properties and its extension between Griggs and Pearson. S. Two additional rows of cedar trees at least Six feet in height shall be planted iwediately easterly of the space between Kochman and Pearson, in order to continue the double line of cedars in place at Successive intervals of four feet from the Had- ley Road residences' rear property lines. (This is in addition to preservation of the existing rocs of cedars which sits on the extension of the rear line of the Hadley Road residences between Kochman and Pea)cson.) C. Within the buffer space behind the Hadley Road properties, five more rows of mixed evergreens and hardwoods not less than eight to ten feet in height (and with individual trees in a row standing at intervals of not more than ten feet from each other) shall be required to be planted at successive twenty -foot inter- vals from the rear line of the Hadley Road properties, with the easterly -most row 100 feet from the rear line of the Hadley road properties, and running the full distance from Twin Oaks ("n/f 13ur- lington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc.") to "N/F W. Wolfe," as shown on the proposed plan. D. High shrubbery, sufficiently deep, wide, and fast --growing to competely shield the satellite dishes behind WVNY from the view of the Hadley Road residences withir: two years, shall be required to be interposed between the satellite dishes and the near line of the Hadley Road properties at a distance of approximately fifteen fr?L-�t from the base of the sterly-most satellite dish. FEP II 42 Hercules Drive Colchester, VT 05446 April 13, 1993 Joe Wyeth City of South Burlington Planning Commission 595 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Subject: Chittenden Bank Dear Joe: Ph. (802) 655-1901 Fax (802) 655-1904 We have recently received the revised Chittenden Plan and offer the following as our initial reaction. #1 We think the improvements and offer of dedicaticn to the city is very promising. We are disappointed that the board would not allow diagonal parking in the 60' ROW. This decision really hurts us as a business and the proposed Wal Mart, Sam's, Pyramid Mall is quite frightening. We are not jumping up and down about our sales. Close up spaces to the front door are our life's blood day in and day out. We respectfully request you to allow that variance for our sake, not as an obstacle to the Chittenden approval. #2 We are working with the architect Jim Lamphere to smooth out details around the Ben Franklin Building. Other than those discussed above. They are traffic/parking, engineering not substantive issues. We are very comfortable with, Mr. Farrell and Mr. Lamphere. #3 We hope the city can cause the Factory Outlet to shut down the very troublesome electronic teller when the new bank is open. The users abuse the traffic lane. #4 Our sales are very fragile so timing, speed and method of implementation is very critical for us, the sooner the better. We will keep you posted and are very interested in your reactions to the Chittenden's plan. And look forward to working the details Jim o* with ;.,amphere. Please advise us of the meetings, we were surprised that this had gotten this far, we weren't aware of the last meeting had occurred. Not finding fault just trying to keep ourselves aware in this rapidly changing world. We encourage your preliminary approval so the Chittenden can move forward. Sincerely, games F. Carroll JFC/clt cc: Jim Lamphere -Hand Carried HPR-13-1993 14:3`7 FROM PIVVHk'] ENGIIJEERIHG TO 65847466916 P.01 comhy s0fars FAX TRANSM=AL JX"' R DATE:_ �>< 1� t �q TIME TO • --- T; a r�W,'.p- , cz FAX NUMBER G- S -- 414 e, r:�• • ••tip Fes.: r�- \ 41Z_ LOCATION: PHONE NUMBER: (802) 658-5588 k. ! ► v • r• •r r3( 0!K . FZAIy (ZNCIUDINC, TRAN=EAL PAGE) PRWDcr NO. G9 I G FKX NUMBM: (802) 658-3629 The MaltcxBuildiiig 431 Fine St., Burlington, VT 05401-�4742 Phone (842) 656 5588 � 41 J r-t 6 �i 1• a a 1.62 QA4 7. x] O •• ?�F. +% 1OY J 0 + /''� 60 CIDsmsz es ' .'fir .: � � A „��, � � � 4a�-• Ij m 0, 4Ll�: • s �� ?A A4f2G�cL �' vj i b �::: �.� fy. I'- ♦ � _ � .. � .. a 't - ,,�� ( `'� .,iC a w."... '" - -�-� �r'� a v'�• t ,� •�'�. ' .F�. i 'i \� I � a 4 � /b ?Y Eg"Orli ;N r LP Oco r• V �0 rt � . S10 8I/ oil Z-44 Jlzo. w t12 h � r1 , 68 S N � 4 L i N O log dt..pa :. �!_ lie :•olrlM • .Arai 'a . :`�- • Mt?.�f��j�' : +,.�f/ . � .. . �~'R.y��� � ;v�+��Y�if. `� �: y ~i'♦: vc��, Z0'd 9i698bLb8S9 01 9NId33NI9N3 WdHANId WOaA Lz:bt 266T-ZI-Zldd w• � V TRANS/OP INC. P.O. Box 29, Route 2A Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 878-5977 April 9, 1993 Mr. David Marshall, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Falls Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Dear Mr. Marshall: Because the banking facilities are proposed to be revised in the vicinity of Factory Outlet in South Burlington, Vermont, turning movement counts at the intersection of Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue and trip generation counts at Chittenden Bank were recorded during the afternoon peak period on Friday, November 2011 1992. The existing bank is to become a walk-in facility with a walk-in ATM, while the new walk-in bank is designed to serve customers with one drive-in ATM and two drive-in windows. Trip generation rates by banking activity were developed for this land -use location. Bank data that are indicative of the Friday before Thanksgiving are reasonable estimates of design hour conditions. Expansion volumes for the proposed levels of bank development are listed in Table 1 for the study site. In addition, pertinent factors for traffic adjustments are noted on this tabular summary. Because the 'proportion of mixed -use trips could not be ascertained during the counts at Chittenderi Bank, a published average value of 17 percent was assigned to this component of trip generation. A passby factor of 14 percent was also selected for the new bank trips on the non -driveway facilities. Design hour volumes that are equivalent to 30th highest hour volumes during the afternoon peak hour were developed for the intersection of Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue. These data were forecasted to the base year of 1993 and the design year of 1998 for the intersectional performance analyses. Appropriate temporal adjustments and growth factors for non -mall traffic were developed from volume characteristics collected by the Vermont Agency of Transportation at Sta. D099 on I189 in South Burlington. Design hour volumes for the four performance evaluations are presented in the following summaries: 1. 1993 without bank modifications - Table 2; 2. 1993 with bank modifications - Table 3; 3. 1998 without bank modifications - Table 4; and 4. 1998 with bank modifications - Table 5. Complete build -out for the two bank facilities was assumed for both analysis years, and all bank expansion trips were assigned to Odell Parkway. Mr. D. Marshall April 9, 1993 Page 2 Results of the performance evaluations are documented in Table 6 for the signalized intersection of Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue. Except for 1993 without the bank modifications, overall `D' levels of service are available during the afternoon peak hour. Service level `D' is defined for average seconds of delay per vehicle in the range from 25 to 40. The objectives of these analyses were to obtain acceptable levels of service with minimum cycle times and with minimum queue lengths. Comparisons of 90th-percentile queue lengths with available storage distances are provided in Table 7 for the study intersection. Although `F' level of service is noted on Odell Parkway in 1998 with the bank modifications, adequate storage lengths exist on this approach. With a revised signal plan, the performance can be improved to service level `E' during the design afternoon peak hour in 1998 with an increase in the maximum storage requirement from 129 to 172 ft. However, the overall traffic performance remains at `D' level of service with an average delay of 35.1 spv for this location. In summary, reasonable performance conditions are available for travel through the study intersection during the afternoon peak hour without and, with the proposed bank modifications in the vicinity of Factory Outlet. Please advise of any additional information that may be required. Very truly yours, Joseph C. Oppenlander, P.E. Vice -President JCO : nj k Enclosure I � 3 Banks at Factory Outlet Size (sq ft) Existing - 1400 Proposed - 2000 Change TABLE 1 EXPANSION TRAFFIC South Burlington, Vermont Development Traffic, Afternoon Peak Hour (vPh) Enter Exit -34 -38 150 170 116 Traffic Adjustments: 1. Mixed -use - 17% 2. Passby - 14% 3. Allocation to Odell Parkway - 100% 132 4 Table 2 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue Westbound 0 330 --------------------- 0 Left 43 0 0 Thru Eastbound 456 50 0 Right 363 West Approach Home Avenue North Approach - Shelburne Road Southbound Northbound 0 0 1227 1303 0 0 0 12 1050 165 Right Thru Left 0 1486 Southbound 1993 Design Hour Volumes Without Bank Expansion Right 0 128 Thru 0 0 63 264 Left 0 73 ------------------- 0 243 East Approach Odell Parkway Left Thru Right 0 0 0 255 1132 28 0 1415 Northbound South Approach - Shelburne Road Westbound Eastbound Vehicles per hour by movement a.m. peak hour over p.m. peak hour a.m. p.m. - 1630-1730 � I S Table 3 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Hone Avenue 1993 Design Hour Volumes With All Bank Expansion at (dell Parkway North Approach - Shelburne Road Southbound Northbound 0 ( 0 1286 1352 0 0 0 12 1044 230 Right Thru Left Right 0 181 Thru 0 0 Westbound 89 374 Westbound 0 354 left 0 --------------------- 104 0 Left ------------------- 0 Eastbound 43 339 0 0 Thru East Approach Eastbound 474 70 Odell Parkway 0 Right 361 West Approach Home Avenue Left Thru Right 0 0 0 253 1128 39 0 0 1509 1420 Southbound Northbound South Approach - Shelburne Road Vehicles per hour by movement a.m. peak hour over p.m. peak hour a.m. p.m. - 1630-1730 rl Table 4 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue Westbound 0 360 --------------------- 0 Left 48 0 0 Thru Eastbound 500 50 0 Right 402 West Approach Home Avenue North Approach - Shelburne Road Southbound Northbound 0 0 1341 1429 0 0 0 14 1162 165 Right Thru Left 0 1637 Southbound 1998 Design Hour Volumes Without Bank Expansion Right 0 128 Thru 0 0 63 264 Left 0 73 ------------------- 0 243 East Approach Odell Parkway Left Thru Right 0 0 0 283 1253 28 0 1564 Northbound South Approach - Shelburne Road Westbound Eastbound Vehicles per hour by movement a.m. peak hour over p.m. peak hour a.m. p.m. - 1630-1730 7 Table 5 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and Home Avenue 1998 Design Hour Volumes With All Bank Expansion at Odell Parkway North Approach - Shelburne Road Southbound Northbound 0 ( 0 1400 1478 0 0 0 14 1156 230 Right Thru Left Right 0 181 Thru 0 0 Westbound 89 374 Westbound 0 384 Left 0 --------------------- 104 0 Left ------------------- 0 Eastbound 48 339 0 0 Thru East Approach Eastbound 518 70 Odell Parkway 0 Right 400 West Approach Now Avenue Left Thru Right 0 0 0 281 1249 39 I 0 0 1660 1569 Southbound Northbound South Approach - Shelburne Road Vehicles per hour by movement a.m. peak hour over p.m. peak hour a.m. p.m. - 1630-1730 8 TABLE 6 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway, and South Burlington,Vermont Home Avenue Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With* Without With* 1993 DHV (1630 - 1730) Shelburne Rd. - North App. 19.7 24.7 C C Shelburne Rd. - South App. 28.1 39.2 D D Odell Pky. - East App. 13.9 22.8 B C Home Ave. - West App. 7.8 7.7 B B Intersection 21.2 28.0 C D 1998 DHV (1630 - 1730) Shelburne Rd. - North App. 19.2 25.4 C D Shelburne Rd. - South App. 26.1 44.7 D E Odell Pky. - East App. 98.6 93.2 F F Home Ave. - West App. 11.2 9.7 B B Intersection 26.8 37.7 D D * With all bank expansion at Odell Parkway. Md�C�,weAMh.. TABLE 7 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Shelburne Road, Odell Parkway and Home Avenue Approach North App. South App. East App. West App. North App. South App. East App. West App. Lane TR L TR L R LT R LT TR L TR L R LT R LT South Burlington, Vermont 90-P Queue Storage (ft) (ft) Without With Full Width Taper 1993 DHV 299 114 326 176 49 80 142 55 1998 DHV 415 146 452 251 67 110 213 80 304 500+ - 161 85 109 336 269 - 177 94 74 68 140 - 110 140 - 136 500+ - 65 105 35 380 500+ - 185 85 109 418 269 - 227 94 74 80 140 - 129 140 - 178 500+ - 79 105 35 ' } Wiemann-Lamphere Chittenden Bank ' WLC93P4 Afternoon Peak Hour SIGNAL85/TEAPAC - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 Shelburne Rd, Home Ave. Odell METROAREA FRINGE POPULATION 25 TYPE 1 PEDTIME 'O 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N GRADES .5 PEDLEVELS 0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 1.00 PARKINGSIDES NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 BUSSTOPS NONE BUSVOLUMES 0 PERMISSIVES NO Movement Parameters 04/11/93 22:17:20 E S W .0 -.5 -2.0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 NONE NONE NONE 0 0 0 NONE NONE NONE 0 0 0 NO NO NO MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 12 1050 165 128 63 73 28 1132 255 WIDTHS .0 22.0 10.0 12.0 12.0 .0 .0 22.0 10.0 LANES 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 CHANNELIZATIONS HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI TRUCKPERCENTS 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.7 1.7 1.7 ARRIVALTYPE 3 3 0 3 3 0 3 3 0 ACTUATIONS NO NO YES YES YES YES NO NO YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 8.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 CAPACITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FACTORS 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 UTILIZATIONS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Analysis Parameters GREENTIMES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 Design Parameters RT TH LT 363 50 43 11,0 10.0 .0 1 1 0 HI HI HI 2.3 2.3 2.3 3 3 0 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 0 0 0 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 LEVELOFSERVICE C S CYCLES 60 150 5 SEQUENCES 41 EXCESS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wiemann-Lamphere Chittenden Bank WL..C93P4 Afternoon Peak: Hour STGNALOS/TE:FaPAC: -- Capacity Analysis Summary .Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation .79 Vehicular Delay Sequence 41 1 Phase 1. 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 1 + .. 1 + + 1 -I-+•+-+ i + + i ++++ V i V i *' i V ------------------------------------------ i G/C= .170 i G/ C= .331 1 G/C= .291 i 1 G= 10.7 " 1 G== 19.3 " 1 G== 17„4 " 1 Y== 4.0 " 1 Y'= 4.0 " 1 Yw 4.0 " 1 ------------------------------------- C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = BO , t, M Y=12 . 0 sec 04/11/0 1 2: 19:3' 21.2 Level of Service C_: 20 . U%. Fed= .0 sec = . 0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Lane 1 Wi.dt:h/ 1 G/C 1 Service Rate: Ad j 1 HCM 1 L 1 Maximum 1 , Group Lanes! f E:•.r.}c:i U.,E..c:1 C ✓pI••i) C_=: Jo ]. umf. , Delay S 1 Queue , N Approach 19.7 C+ 1 TH+RT 1 22/2 1 .21 1 .33 1 1137 1 1209 1 1062 1 19.9 1 C+ 1 299 f t 1 1 LT 1 1 .14 1 .18 1 226 1 298 1 165 1 19.9 1 C:+1 114 ft 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach 28.1. D-1- 1 TH+F,'T 1 22/2 1 .34 1 .33 1 1 140 1 1213 1 1 160 1 27.2 1 *D+ 1 326 f t 1 1 LT 1 1.0/ 1 1 .20 1 .18 1 227 1 300 1 255 1 32.3 1 *D+ 1 1.76 f t 1 Imo' Approach 13.9 B 1 RT 1 1. 2/ 1. 1 .12 1 .54 1 925 1 864 1 129 1 5.3 1 B+ 1 49 f t; 1 1 LTA-TH 1 12 / 1 1 .29 1 .29 1 146 1 199 1 136 1 21.9 1 *C 1 80 f t 1 W Approach 7.0 D-1- 1 RT 1 1 1/ 1. 1 .28 1 .54 1 802 1 842 1 363 1 6.6 1 B+ 1 142 f t 1 1L..T+Tl1 1 10l1 1 .12 1 .29 1 274 1 335 1 93 1 1.2.6 1 9 1 55 'f't: 1 } � Wiemann-Lamohere Chittenden Bank 02/22/93 WLC93P5W 14:53:43 Afternoon Peak Hour with Development SIGNAL85/TEAPAC - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 Shelburne Rd, Home Ave, Odell METROAREA FRINGE POPULATION 25 TYPE 1 PEDTIME .0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .5 .0 -.5 -E.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSSTOPS NONE NONE NONE NONE BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 12 1044 230 181 89 104 39 1128 253 361 70 43 WIDTHS .0 22.0 10.0 12.0 12.0 .0 .0 22.0 10.0 11.0 10.0 .0 LANES 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 CHANNELIZATIONS HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI TRUCKPERCENTS 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.7 1.7 1.7 2.3 2.3 2.3 ARRIVALTYPE 3 3 0 3 3 0 3 3 0 3 3 0 ACTUATIONS NO NO YES YES YES YES NO NO YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 MINIMUMS 8.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 CAPACITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FACTORS 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 UTILIZATIONS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Analysis Parameters GREENTIMES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 4'00 4.00 4.00 CRITICAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 Desiqn Parameters LEVELOFSERVICE C S CYCLES 60 150 5 SEQUENCES 41 EXCESS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wiemarrrrr--Lamphere Chitt:enderr Bank WLC93P5W Afternoon Peak: Hour with Development SIGNAL85/TE:APAC - Capacity Analysis Summary 02/22/93 14: 56:2i Intersection Averages: I:)c-:nr..e_..e of Saturation .84 Vehicular Delay R8.0 Level of Service D+ Sequence 41 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 3 1 + ; + + ; + + + + + 1 + + + .i_ i -r- v t ::> 1 -+- + ++ : ;++++ ;++++ v 1 v G/C= .167 1 G/C= .315 G/C= .318 G= 1.0.0 " 1 G= 1.8.9 " 1 G::_ 19.1 " 1 , Y= 4.0 " 1 Y= 4.0 " , Y= 4.0 „ • 60 se_:.c_• G= 48.0 sec = 80 . i % Y= 12 . G sec_: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Lane !Width/1 to/ C 1 Service Fate! Adq 1 HCM 1 L 1 Maximum,' 1 Group 1 Lanes! Re: qd Used 1 C (vph) E. i VG lume? i Delay 1 S 1 (,•).lute 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Approach 24.7 C , TH+RT1 22/2 1 .31 1 .31 1074 1 1151 1 1056 a3.5 C 1 304 ft 1 L..l" 1 10 / 1 1 ..18 1 .17 208 1 279 1 230 ! 30.5 D+ ; 161 ft 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 Approach 39.8 D TH+R-f 1 22/2 1 .34 1 .31 1 1076 1 1 153 1 1 167 1 39.1 : *D 1 336 ft 1 LT 1 10/ 1. 1 .19 1 .17 1 209 1 281 253 1 39.5 1 *D 1 177 ft 1 E Approach 22.8 C 1 RT 1 1 / 1 1 .16 1 .55 1 353 1 89�: i 191 f 5.2 ; B +- ; 68 ft ; L_T'+-ft-I 1 1 c/ 1 1 .33 .32 1 167 813 193 39.4 1 *D 1 110 ft 1 W Approach 7.7 B..,- 1 F T 1 1 1/ 1. .27 .55 I R30 86 7 1 361 1 6.1 1 H-+- 1 136 ft 1 1 L..T+TH 1 1 f_+/ 1 1 .16 1 .32 1 225 279 1 113 1 12.7 1 2 1 65 ft 1 � } /���/J / ' Wiemann-Lamphere Chittenden Bank WLC98P4 Afternoon Peak Hour SIGNAL85/TEAPAC - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 Shelburne Rd, Home Ave. Odell 04/11/9, 22:23:1` METROAREA FRINGE POPULATION 25 TYPE 1 PEDTIME .0 0 - Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .5 .0 -.5 -2.0 PEDLEVELS 0 O 0 0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSSTOPS NONE NONE NONE NONE BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 14 1162 165 128 63 73 28 1253 283 402 50 48 WIDTHS .0 22.0 10.0 12.0 12.0 .0 .0 22.0 10.0 11,0 10.0 .0 LANES 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 CHANNELIZATIONS HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI HI TRUCKPERCENTS 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.7 1.7 1.7 2.3 2.3 2.3 ARRIVALTYPE 4 4 0 3 3 0 4 4 0 3 3 0 ACTUATIONS NO NO YES YES YES YES NO NO YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 8.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 CAPACITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FACTORS 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 UTILIZATIONS 1,00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Analysis Parameters GREENTIMES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 Design Parameters LEVELOFSERVICE C S CYCLES 60 150 5 SEQUENCES 41 EXCESS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Wiemann-Lamphere Chittenden Bank WLC98P4 Afternoon Peak: Hour f31GNAL85/TEAPAC -- Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation .80 Vehicular Delay Sequence 41 1 Phase 1. 1 Phase 2 1 Phase ::3 : + + + + + + + : + + + + : : V : •!f• •#• : v : : G/C=16.6 =.20 : G/C= .371 1 G/C= .272 : 1 G= 1.6 . 6 " : G= 29.6 " : G= 21.7 " : 1 1 " 1 1 1 " 1 Y ._ " - 4.0 1 4.0 4.0 1 -------------------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 68.0 sec = 2 5 . 0% Y=12 . 0 04/11/93 22: 25: 1 t3 26.8 Level of Service D+ sec = 1 5 . 0% Ped = .0 sec = . 0% --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Lane :Width/: G/C 1 Service Fate: Adj 1 HCM 1 L 1 Maximum, 1 Group1 Lanes! ke • d Used 1 C ! v sh) E : Vo i l.1me : Delay a' 1 S 1 Queue ' W f; y G. �.� F �.� e 1--------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Approach 19.2 1. F ' IH+R3 : 1 22/2 : .34 : .97 : 12 �'O 1 1.355 : 1176 : 19.9 1 3..+: 415 ft : 1 LT : 10/ 1 : .17 : .21 : 225 : 345 1 165 1 22.0 1 C 1 146 ft : S Approach 26.1 D+ 1 TH+RT: 22/2 : .37 1 .37 : 1285 : 1359 1 1281 1 24.7 : *C 1 4` 2 ft : : LT : 1.0/ 1 : .24 1 .21 : 227 : 347 : 283 : 32.2 !*D+! 251 'ft: : 2 Approach 98.6 f- : K•T : 12/ 1 : .16 1 .53 1 793 : 854 : 129 : 7.3 1 9+: 67 ft 1 :l...T+TH : 12/ 1 1 .34 1 .27 1 68 1 103 1 136 1 104.4 : *F" 1 1 1 0 ft 1 W Approach 11.2 B : RT : 1 1 / 1 : .32 i .53 : 7 i� 1 : C £332 1 40i � : 9.4 : W Y2 1 3- ft : : LT+TH 1 1 O/ 1: .22 1 .27 1 176 : 250: 98 : 18.5 1 C+: 00 ft 1 � � ~ Wiemann-Lamphere Chittenden Bank WLC98P5W Afternoon Peak Hour with Development 02/22/93 ' 14:58:30 SIGNAL85/TEAPAC - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 Shelburne Rd, Home Ave, Odell METROAREA FRINGE POPULATION 25 TYPE 1 PEDTIME .0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E GRADES .5 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 1.00 1.00 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 BUSSTOPS NONE NONE BUSVOLUMES 0 0 PERMISSIVES NO NO Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES CHANNELIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS ARRIVALTYPE ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS CAPACITIES FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS UTILIZATIONS RT TH LT 14 1156 230 -0 22.0 10.0 0 2 1 HI HI HI 1'7 1.7 1.7 4 4 0 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 0 0 0 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.00 1'00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT TH LT 181 89 104 12.0 12.0 .0 1 1 0 HI HI HI 1.2 1.2 1.2 3 3 0 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 0 0 0 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 S -.5 1.00 NONE 0 NONE 0 NO RT TH LT 39 1249 281 '0 22.0 10'0 0 2 1 HI HI HI 1.7 1.7 1.7 4 4 0 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 0 0 0 1.06 1.06 1.06 1,00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 Analysis Parameters GREENTIMES .00 .00 ,00 .00 .00 .00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 Desiqn Parameters 1.00 NONE 0 NONE 0 NO RT TH LT 400 70 48 11'0 10'0 .0 1 1 0 HI HI HI 2.3 2.3 2.3 3 3 0 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 0 0 0 1.06 1,06 1.06 1'00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 LEVELOFSERVICE C S CYCLES 60 150 5 SEQUENCES 41 EXCESS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wiemann-Lamphere Chittenden Ban4:: WLC98PSW Afternoon Peak: Hour with Development SIGNAL85/TEAPAC -- Capacity Analysis Summary ti2/22/93 15:01 :90 Intersection AveraUes: Denree of Saturation .89 Vehicular- Delay 37.7 Level of Service D Se'quePice? 41 Phase I Phase 2 : Phase 3 ; ++•++ y : { +++ i`.i : G/C= .177 c/C= .338 G/C= .31.3 : G= 12.4 : G= 23.7 " : G= 21.9 Y= 4.0 Y= 4.0 Y= 4.0 Cm 70 sec La-- 58.0 sec - 82 .'' % Y==12.0 sec _. 17. 1 % Ped= .0 sec = . 0% -------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Lane !Width/: G/C; : Service Fate: AN : HCM : L.. : Maximum! : Group : Lanes! Revd Used : C (vph) L !Volume! Delay : S : Queue : -------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Approach 25.4 D+ : TH+RT: 22/2 : .34 : .94 : 1174 3 12:.36 : 1170 1 24.6 ; C: : 2E:0 ft : : LT : 10 / 1 : .19 : .1e : 204 : 293 : 230 : 29.4 : D+: 185 ft : S Approach 44.7 E+ : TH+RT : 22/ 2 : .37 : .34 : 1177 : 1238 : 1288 : 43.7 : *E+: 418 ft : : L...T : 10/ 1 : .22 : .13 : 205 : 295 : 281 : 49.4 : *E+: 227 ft : E Approach 93.2 F : RT : 12/1 : .17 ; 5 : 837 : 883 : 181 : 6.1 : B+: So ft : : LT+-fH : 12/ 1 : .37 : .31 : 97 : 132 : 193 : 174.9 : }F= : 129 ft : W Approach 9.7 D+ .31 : .55 : 814 : 861 : 400 : 7.6 1 D+: `17e ft ;l_li'TI{ : 10/1 : .29 : .31 : 172 1 226 1 118 1 16.6 : C+; 79 ft : � | � ^ Wiemann-Lamphere Chittenden Bank 04/11/93 WLC98P6W 20:54:58 Afternoon Peak Hour with Development SIGNAL85/TEAPAC - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 Shelburne Rd, Home Ave, Odell METROAREA FRINGE POPULATION 25 TYPE 1 ' PEDTIME .0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .5 .0 -.5 -2,0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSSTOPS NONE NONE NONE NONE BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES UIDTHS LANES CHANNELIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS ARRIVALTYPE ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS CAPACITIES FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS UTILIZATIONS RT TH LT 14 1156 230 .0 22.0 10.0 0 2 1 HI HI HI 1.7 1.7 1.7 4 4 0 NO NO YES 4.0 4,0 4.0 8.0 8.0 6'0 0 0 0 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT TH LT 181 89 104 12.0 12.0 .0 1 1 0 HI HI HI 1,2 1.2 1.2 3 3 0 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 0 0 0 1.06 1.06 1-06 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT TH LT 39 1249 281 .0 22.0 10.0 0 2 1 HI HI HI 1.7 1.7 1.7 4 4 0 NO NO YES 4,0 4'0 4.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 0 0 0 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Analysis Parameters GREENTIMES 16.00 36.00 36.00 .00 .00 .00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 CRITICAL 9 8 11 0 0 0 Desiqn Parameters RT TH LT 400 70 48 11.0 10.0 ,0 1 1 0 HI HI HI 2.3 2.3 2.3 3 3 0 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 0 0 0 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LEVELOFSERVICE C S CYCLES 100 100 5 SEQUENCES 41 EXCESS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wiemanr--Lamphere Chittenden Ban[..-. WL..C98P6W Afternoon Peak: Hour with Development SIGNAL85/TEAPAC - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation .85 Vehicular Delay Sequence 41 Phase 1. 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 : 1 + ' ' : + + 1 h + + + + : * + 1 + + + + : v : : +++•+- rt• : •i4• : '•1 +++ : V : '' '*' : v : 1 G/C= .160 G/C= .960 : G/C= .360 1 { G= 16.0 " 1 G= 36.0 " 1 G== 36.0 " 1 ' Y= 4.0 " 1 Y= 4.0 " 1 Y= 4.0 " 1 C=10 r sec G= 88.0 sec. = 88.0% Y=12.0 20 L yi0 .` y 35.1 Level of Service D sec_ = 12.0% F'ed= .0 sec = .0% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Lane :Width/: G/C 1 Service Rate: Adi 1 HCM 1 L 1 Ma;imuml 1 Grc<�_tp 1 Lanes! Regd Used 1 C (vf:rtr) L. 1 Uc� 1 �.rme 1 Delcry 1 �; 1 Queue N Approach 28.2 D+ 1 TH'+RT 1 22/2 1 .36 : .36 : 1181 1 1316 : 1170 1 24.4 1 C : 525 ft 1 LT : 10/1 : .26 1 .16 1 1 1 251 1 230 : 47.6 1 E+: 271 ft 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 Approach 44.3 E:+ : TH+R T : 2212 : .39 : .::36 1 1 184 1 1319 : 128c3 : 34.4 : *D 1 578 ft : 1 LT 1 1.0/1 1 .28 1 .16 : 1 1 253 1 281 1 89M 1 *F= : 331 ft : E Approach 53.9 E 1 RT 1 1.2/ 1 1 .25 1 .56 1 B2 7 1 903 : 181 : 8.3 1 D+: III ft 1 1 Ll"+ TH : 12/ 1 1 .41 1 .36 1 116 1 172 : 193 1 96.7 : F : 172 ft : W Approach 12.2 H 1 RT 1 1 1. / 1 1 .35 1 .56 1 804 1 880 1 400 1 10.1 1 H 1 247 ft 1 1 LT+TH 1 1.0/ 1. 1 .32 1 .36 1 184 1 266 1 1 1 3 1 19.2 1 *C+ 1 106 ft 1 EXISTING LEGEND PROPOSED -- PROPERTY LINE -- `I --- z, --_— CONTOUR x;, O LIGHTING g .. -- -- -- • FLOOD LIGHTS HADLEY ROAD R.O.W. _------------ CURB — SUNKEN CURB -----•----•••- -- 'A WATERT7 ws - 5 SANITARY SEWER 5 STORM SEWER Ss I I N/F I N/F I N/F l i N/F I N/F I N/F N/F I N/F c GAS D I I G. k W. I L. k L. I B. BARNEY I T. k P. I LP. BROOKS R. k M. I F. k J. I W.C. ue—UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC GRIGGS BROOKS M.JSKAHAN TARKMA N HASKINS I I REDFIELD I KOCHMAN I PEARSON I - I qy a POWER POLE ! N/F J k B SNYDER I I N/F 'I W. WOLFE TRIL�ST r_ r- - ' I x5 r- N CHAMPLAIN-OIL ( �Oj INC. N/F 1 I A. Le R. 1 REVERS ! a HOME II AVENUE I / ' � r ' � ��m IIIM-x76A / MV.-106.6 v• / / N S' STOCKADE FENCE EL PRWY BEN FRANKLIN SOUTH BURUNGTON FACTORY OUTLET CENTER N/F HEATHCOTE ASSOCIATES PHILIP MEHLER REALTY I a it = -ie1 11 11Aquo=-- I� BAMBINOS A', < Ie6511 F a %bl T ft�_ r— --t F_ — I r— it _ \I � I I v\ I I I I I L GRAPHIC SCALE r r r 1 1—h - 50 'L • SHUT-OFF VALVE RAO REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF I I N/F BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, INC. Lill ` iD. 1 :aD.Ra 1FIRURE EAIIktw +u I F to I 1 I 12+00 13+00 14.00 \���� I 1M�.00 1 1 / r M3/20' IAOIMTIN�EI6H'T :fOR-OBELI?AIIKwAY) MIKE CE YK OF/ O'OELL PMK.AK.AY ."I. OFFfR OF I I IRON TOUCHDORA PROPERTIES TD OTY Or SOUTH 9URINCTOH / N/F NEW ENTERPRISES, INC. #00 I N/F I R.M. STEVEN! JOY DRIVE F#72 N/F OLYMPIAD COURT ASSOCIATES I I #70 N/F OLYMPIAD COURT ASSOCIATES I GARDENS FOR ALL, INC. UTILITY PLAN O'DELL PARK PCD Date Ch'k'd Revs on ISOLITH BURLINGTON Drawn by ti Date i SHEET CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES . INC. Checked by DAM Scale ° `-'=' SlELBUR/E VER IONT C-3 Approved by — Protect No. 9310E MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: Joe Weith, City Planner RE: Farrell - Chittenden Bank, Traffic Impact Analysis C DATE: April 13, 1993 The traffic impact analysis for the above referenced project was submitted to this office on April 12, 1993. I have only briefly reviewed the analysis. My initial concerns at this point are summarized below: 1. Table 3 indicates that with the project the Odell Parkway intersection will operate at an overall LOS of "C" during the 1993 DHV and overall LOS "D" during the 1998 DHV. However, a critical movement (Shelburne Road south approach) will decline from a "D" to "E" during 1998. It is typically City policy that critical movements should not fall below LOS "D". 2. I am concerned with the que lengths for the north approach left turn, south approach through - right and left turns. There does not appear to be sufficient storage to accommodate these ques. 3. The current southbound left turn has a protected phase that is / very short, perhaps only 2 or 3 seconds. -I assume this analysis incorporates different signal timings than currently exist. What impact will changing the signal timings have on the Factory Outlet Mall intersection? 4. I am concerned with the location of the westernmost curb cut serving Ben Franklin. It is located only 25 feet from the Shelburne Road intersection. (farrell) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 A/ i qy3 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 46" VI'l&, A;"16-U c/' nc.v- /,ram-k t C y Zcq-� Ate /C 7-14ej s�a.w, � lg�oxr- e;l 7 -, 0 6) �� . �AMOUREUX & STONE- 14 Morse Drive Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 (802) 878-4450 December 4, 1992 South Burlington Planning Commission City Hall South Burlington, Vermont RE: Proposed New Site Plan for Farrell Parcel - Shelburne Street Ladies & Gentlemen: 27 High Street St. Albans, Vermont 05478 (802) 524-5245 We have reviewed the latest Sketch Plans SD-1 and SD-2 entitled O'Dell Park P.C.D. Site Plan dated 11-92 and 10-92 on behalf of our client, Heathcote Associates, who own the abutting Factory Outlet Mall. Please be advised that there are concerns about the following issues that we believe will directly or indirectly significantly impact the safety and/or welfare of the existing Factory Outlet Mall development. We are respectfully requesting that you do not approve this proposed sketch plan until all of the following basic issues have been adequately addressed by the applicant. O'Dell Parkway should be designed and constructed as a public street from Shelburne Street to Farrell Street. There are enough businesses and high traffic volumes that have been created piecemeal for many years from the Farrell lands that a public O'Dell Parkway collector street should be seriously considered. This may be the last opportunity. We understand that this is also a recommendation of the City Engineer. 2. The latest proposal for O'Dell Parkway presents a 60 foot wide right-of-way from Shelburne Street to a point approximately 150 feet easterly of Shelburne Street, thence, a 45 foot wide right-of-way easterly along the Factory Outlet boundary to the Davis et al. lands. This should not be approved since a 45 foot wide right-of-way is not adequate by any standards and certainly not by City regulations. The applicant's plans do not clearly state what is to be deeded to the City. In any case, there is significant relevant information that has not been clearly presented on the plans. Please find the enclosed Attachment A, which is a copy of the applicant's sheet SD-1, where we have added and crosshatched an existing perpetual easement and right-of- way to Heathcote Associates. The other existing businesses in this complex also have a similar easement over O'Dell Parkway. This easement and right-of-way states in part Civil, Environmental & Transportation Engineering • Planning • Land Surveying South Burlington Planning Commission December 4, 1992 Page 2 that Heathcote Associates has "Full and free right and liberty for Grantee (now Heathcote Assoc.) and such successors and assigns, and its and their tenants, servants, visitors, and licenses, in common with all others now or hereafter having rights therein, with or without vehicles of any description, for all purposes connected with the use and enjoyment of the said land and premises to pass and repass over and across the strip of land described on Schedule A attached hereto for the purpose of ingress and egress from and to Shelburne Street and Farrell Street, together with the right to pave, illuminate, landscape, maintain and improve such easement and right-of- way for such purposes." Not only does this easement and right-of-way state that the Outlet Mall parcel has the rights of ingress and egress, etc., but it goes on to state that Farrell, as original grantor of the easement and right-of-way, can "not materially adversely effect the Grantee's use and enjoyment of the easement and right-of-way granted." Therefore, the main easement and right-of-way issues are: a) Why doesn't the applicant's plan show the exact location of the easement and right-of-way that is presented on Attachment A? b) Why can't the applicant grant this existing 60 foot wide easement and right-of- way to the City when they have already granted these rights to all or most of the businesses within this complex? If this is truly a planned commercial development, it should now have a well defined, designed and constructed public collector road from Shelburne Street to Farrell Street. c) It does not seem sensible to force the City to someday acquire an easement to Farrell Street from Davis et al. if at all possible, when the complex already has a well defined easement and right-of-way along the north boundary of Heathcote Assoc. and Davis et al. d) Because the easement and right-of-way deed states that the applicant can not materially adversely affect Heathcote Assoc. and others use and enjoyment of the easement and right-of-way, how can the City consider approval of a sketch plan with a portion of a parking lot, such as that shown on the plan SD-1 just east of Bambino's or even blocking the triangular so called "seeded" area between Shelburne Street, O'Dell Parkway and the north line of Heathcote Assoc. or any other obstructions within the existing O'Dell Parkway. e) Champlain Oil Co. Inc. has a 50 foot wide easement from its parcel on Shelburne South Burlington Planning Commission December 4, 1992 Page 3 Street's easterly street sideline to O'Dell Parkway. This is shown on Plan SD-2. Why doesn't this plan also show the Heathcote Assoc. 50 foot wide easement along the easterly sideline of Shelburne Street from the 60 foot wide easement to O'Dell Parkway? Heathcote Assoc. and others can use this easement and right-of-way. In addition, the Champlain Oil Co. Inc right-of-way description states in part that "Said right-of-way shall be used solely for travel by foot or in vehicles, and shall not be used for parking of any vehicles, display of merchandise, or any other purpose whatsoever." The proposed sketch plan shows 7 parking spaces in this easement. 3. The proposed Farrell bank will cause unreasonable congestion on the Outlet Mall property. As previously stated, we have performed extensive peak hour traffic analysis modelling on the Outlet Mall site, Shelburne Road and the adjacent portion of the Farrell site. The results indicate that the Farrell bank proposal will generate a minimum of an additional 122 peak hour vehicles traveling through and significantly impacting the Outlet Mall lands between Shelburne Road via the south access and west frontage road and O'Dell Parkway. This traffic impact will be higher with the recent addition of the forth drive through lane at the proposed Farrell Bank. The plan is not clearly labeled as to this lane use and dimensions. 4. A major concern is the one-way "exit only" from the Outlet Mall onto O'Dell Parkway shown on the sketch plan. This is not acceptable since the recorded easement and right-of-way allows "ingress and egress" and the right to "pass and repass over and across" O'Dell Parkway. How will the applicant narrow the drive and construct a new sidewalk on the Heatthcote property? The Planning Commission should not approve this gross proposal even at sketch plan. 5. Who is the applicant on this project? The plan SD-1 states it is only Thomas Farrell. There appears to be other owners on the same plan where improvements are being proposed who should be co -applicants. Also, shouldn't all of the parties that have rights to the easement and right-of-way shown on Attachment A be parties to this City permit application at least for the development that is being proposed in the easement and right-of-way? 6. The applicant now has six curb cuts shown on O'Dell Parkway as presented on plan SD-2. At the October 13, 1992 Planning Commission meeting, it was stated during the review of the Heathcote sketch plan which presented only four Factory Outlet Mall curb cuts on O'Dell Parkway that "other members also expressed serious concerns about these curb cuts, noting that if and when O'Dell Parkway becomes a full through street, South Burlington Planning Commission December 4, 1992 Page 4 it would have these additional curb cuts to contend with". Four or five curb cuts in this segment of O'Dell Parkway are not a problem but six may be. In addition, the Champlain Oil curb cut is much too close to Shelburne Street and will be blocked by stacked traffic on O'Dell Parkway. And vehicles attempting to turn left from O'Dell Parkway into the Champlain Oil driveway will present a very hazardous situation. 7. What is the lot coverage for this proposal, or more important, for the over-all site or land holdings? What are the future plans for the remainder of the parcel? How will this impact the Heathcote property? 8. The Proposal should address the use of Bacon Street, the O'Dell Parkway and/or drive access point to the remaining Farrell lands, Farrell Street and the Outlet Mall lands in terms of public traffic safety and over-all circulation (11.504d). 9. The two way 6 foot wide bike lane on O'Dell Parkway shown on the sketch plan is substandard and hazardous with traffic opposing bicycles a few feet apart (see AASHTO regulations). 10 The Ben Franklin parking lot entrance at O'Dell Parkway does not safely line-up with the existing Outlet Mall frontage road intersection. 11. O'Dell Parkway is 5 feet off center in the 60 foot easement/right-of-way. 12. According to Table 1 of the Regulations, the proposed Farrell bank needs stacking room for 6 cars per lane or a minimum 132 feet in length. The plan shows 120 feet staking space. We intend to continue our review of this proposal. In the meantime, please contact our firm if there are any questions. Sincerely, Leonard A. Lamou eux, P.E., L.S. cc: Philip Mehler Peter Collins 9284plan.11 tl/ ram, Ey r-o�n GfIGE4 1. L I h ( Q p1J6 4 4 IiL __ �Yo•.r dales >trx � 5_ a � - � ,✓r as Wow 1vW� , �-�'-� A OLJ- ? �' SA+Tq/,cawn.YifoN �Vt / I ' 4. cur14NUT-1 tA-,VK MLZT 1 T- I I I I I I 1 i p I EK�e%W Co 101! �o{ �sL�uJ lr E.�6r C� nsHI DIFY�fo I u/r Ylarlo er f� rjF JeI�a+T' PERPETUAL EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FACTORY OUTLET MALL AND OTHERS U � %L °� o Z Q&',4 L7 Ib \ i (o01 I -44 e,&3-11 v ( IPA1o1A(1'V ORFiiIY ofa� .r Id. _ S 1 T e DQ tit ter+. b c o rr,.•l— <w rp-- NYM/ Jj,w,; f• 41 rK eA. Y 4- - t 10 �7�G G111TiWceN CNW ,YO a.�. rurLG IXf. •�' wOn. kq'lo 12 c�cec M�'�u'Idt Fr-Tra GfX^TY 7D'D YM YXd 7pTAL fe!!O (6x[wawi aVSFuI') Oki ja1f� ryv,^eev v-Yi wv 3 J 1S32 City of So. Burlington ATTACHMENT A CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P. O. Box 485 (802) 985-2323 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 Fax No. (802) 985-2271 CHARLES R. DUNHAM President STEPHEN A. VOCK Vice President JEAN -CAROL DUNHAM Treasurer February 5, 1993 Mr. William Szymanski, P.E. South Burlington City Engineer So. Burlington City Offices 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vt 05403 Re: O'Dell Parkway Meeting Minutes Dear Bill, Thank you for taking the time to meet with myself and Dennis Webster on Thursday to discuss the design approach for O'Dell Parkway. We have summarized our discussions in the enclosed meeting minutes. Please review them in the next two weeks and let me know if any clarifications need to be made. We have also enclosed for your use a 1 tt = 100" plan of the preliminary drawing we reviewed. Respectfully, David S. Marshall, P.E. Enclosures cc: D. Webster J. Weith \dsm\cdel12 STUDIES • DESIGN • INSPECTION • TESTING SURVEYING & LAND DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULICS & HYDROLOGY SANITARY & WATER FOUNDATIONS & STRUCTURES CONCRETE & SOIL TESTING MEETING MINUTES DATE: February 4, 1993 TIME: 11:00 A.M. LOCATION: So. Burlington City Offices IN ATTENDANCE: Bill Szymanski, So. Burlington City Engineer Dennis Webster, Wiemann-Lamphere Architects Dave Marshall, Civil Engineering Associates PROJECT: O'Dell Parkway, So. Burlington, Vermont Discussion: 1. Based on a review of projected pedestrian movements, it was agreed that a 5' wide sidewalk would be constructed on the north side of O'Dell Parkway from Route 7 to Bambino's. A 5' wide sidewalk would be constructed on the south side from Route 7 to the northwestern Outlet Mall access. The section from the northwestern most access to Bambino's would be dedicated to green space since pedestrians moving from the back parking lot of the Outlet Mall to the front would most likely use the paved access on the north side of the building. Bill Szymanski indicated that he was concerned with north -south pedestrian movements at the northwest corner of the Outlet Mall building and at Bambino's. It was agreed that crosswalk markings would be added at those locations. 2. Due to the fact that O'Dell Parkway will need to be constructed to City standards while also trying to tie into existing conditions without reconstructing a larger than necessary area, it was agreed that the sidewalks would ramp down to meet existing grade at each of the access drives off of O'Dell Parkway. Bill Szymanski did indicate that the curbing at each of these access drives would have to be continuous with the top of the depressed curb creating a 11/2" lip. The elevation of the sidewalk that crosses each access drive could not be lower than the top of the depressed curb to minimize the potential for ponding. 3. Bill Szymanski indicated that he would be supportive of a request to vary the requirements for the horizontal alignment since this road will have a high amount of pedestrian movements and the curves as shown will help control vehicle speeds. O'Dell Parkway Minutes Page 2 February 4, 1993 4. Concerning the drainage at the site, Bill Szymanski indicated that any redirection of the runoff (that currently drains toward Hadley Road) should be towards the brook on the north side of the Davis property. He indicated that is would be preferable if the O'Dell Parkway storm drainage system could discharge at the same location. Diverting some runoff to Bacon Street would require replacing the existing 8" diameter lines and dealing with the City of Burlington and runoff to Englesby Ravine. 5. The meeting was adjourned 11:55 a.m. Respectfully submitted, David S. Marshall, P.E. DSM:pao 4mat y��� Sys t �V / IIIII� 11 I I j IIllu�ll ;1`` I I � 1 o-I s i ' .\\\•\\ \\\ I\ I \�� 11 N� i i t I t J/ / rrr / c.1 // rl r I x r f� t / Rdxsl.ry� i%b.bC R •474'W [ zw.oc' I I I I I I w TRANS/OP INC. P.O. Box 29, Route 2A Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 878-5977 Wovember 6, 1992 Mr. James A. Lamphere, R.A. Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Dr. Colchester, Vermont 05446 Dear Mr. Lamphere: Traffic performance evaluations at the intersection of Shelburne Road, Odell Drive, and Home Avenue have been prepared to assess the proposed expansion of Chittenden Hank that is located near Factory outlet in South Burlington, Vermont. This drive --in facility is to be relocated on Odell Drive and expanded from 1400 to 2000 sq ft in total size. The existing building has one walk-in and two drive-in windows, while the new bank is designed to serve customers with one _ _ drive-in ATM and two drive-in wandows., oleoZJ�° Design hour volumes that are equivalent to 30th highest hour volumes during the afterno n peak hour were developed from turning movement counts taken at_.the study intersection in June 1990. These data were forecasts to the base year of 1993 and the design year of 1998 for the 'intersectional performance analyses. Expansion traffic for a Drive-in Bank, Land Use Code 912, was developed from the 1991 publication entitled "nip Generation, Fifth Edition and published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers and are listed in Table 1 for the afternoon peak. hour. Design hour volumes for the four performance evaluations are presented in the following summaries: 1. 1993 without bank expansion - Table 2; 2. 1993 with bank expansion - Table 3; 3. 1998 without bank expansion - Table: 4; and 4. 1998 with bank expansion -- Table 5. All expansion traffic was assigned to the study intersection as vehicular trips. No allowances were made for walk-in customers from the adjacent shopping center, for ingress and egross at the intersection of Shelburne Road, Factory Outlet Driveway, and Sears Driveway, and for pass -key tripaa. Results of the performance evaluations are documented in Table 6 for the signalized intersection of Shelburne Road, Odell Drive, and Home Avenue. In all situations, cl levels of service are available without and with the proposed bank expansion during the afternoon peak hour. The small additional volumes generated by the expansion of Chittenden Bank do not increase the average delays for the respective years of analysis. In summary, the proposed bank expansion has no significant impacts on traffic conditions at the study location. 7 OS:ST 26, 2T 22A 10 T&� 999 ���HdIJH� hIhIN 1�I� O -A,., W1 ,v,,,,_. 62 1 nt . dt-,k Mr. James A. Lamphere November 6, 1992 Page 2 Please advise of any additional information that may be required. Thank you. Very truly yours, Joseph C. Oppenlander, P.E. Vice -President JCO.njk Enclosures L_1S : ST 26 ; ST S5_� 7_01:� S99 33�JdHdWH_1 HNHlJ3I I I 2,9S'3SS'3r7 C13 1 3 Chit,tenden Bank Size (sq ft) 1400 2000 Change TABLE 1 EXPANSION TRAFFIC South Burlington, Vermont Developzuent Traffic, Afternoon peak Hour (yph) Enter Exit 29 32 / 42 45 1.3 13 �� Table 2 INTERUCTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLLINES Shelburne Road, Odell Or(ve, W)d Hume AY*nUe Noeth Approach - Shelburne Road Southbound j Northbound 0 0 1398 j 1335 0 0 0 38 1246 114 Right Thru Left Westbound 0 308 0 Lett 49 0 0 Thru Eastbound 481 30 0 Right 402 West Approach Home Avenue I I� 1995 Design Hour volume Without Bank !xpanaIon I Right 0 l0i Thru 0 0 Weotbound 31 158 Left 0 26 .-..--------.-....- 0 Eastbound 152 Eae Approach ode (I drive I . Left Thru Right 0 0 0 239 1185 8 0 ! q 1674 { 1432 Southbound I Northbound South Approach - Shelburne Road i vehictes�per hour by moveftnt a.m. peak our over p.m. peak hour a.m. p.m. - 1636-1730 SS Sti 26, BT S3J b0d S99 i 3c13H&Jb-1 Nl,]H- kl3I M 2,9S9SS9FFl Table 3 INTERSECTION TURNINp MOVEMENT VOLUMES Shelburne Road, Odell Drive, and Horn Avenue North Approach - Shelburne Road Southbound Northbound 0 0 1405 1343 i 0 0 0 38 1246 124 j Right Thru Left weatbound 0 311 0 Left 49 0 0 Thru Eastbound 483 32 0 Right 402 West Approach Nome Avenue 1993 Design dour Volumes With Bank Expa6ion t i i i Right 0 109 Y Thru 0 0 weetbound 34 ,t 171 Left 0 0 Eastbound 165 East Approach Odell Drive i i t i Left Thru Right 0 0 0 239 1185 9 0 0 1676 1433 Southbound ) Northbound South Approach - Shelburne Road I Vehiclesperhour by movement a.m. peak Mour over p.m. peak hour { a.m, p.m. - 1636.1730 �?!�I—I.—IIIH1 LItJHLI�TfO i �COCCO?fd C� -- -- -- .- Table 4 INTERSECTION TURNING OOVCMENT VOLUMES Shelburne Rood, Odell Drive, and Home Avenue 1998 Design Hour VOIuMS Without Bank Expansion weutbo" 0 331! 0 Left 54 0 0 Thru Eastbound 529 30 0 Right 445 West Approach Home AVerxae North Approach - Shelburne Road Southbound Northbound 0 ` 0 1535 1466 0 0 0 42 1379 114 Right Thru Left Right 0 101 Thru 0 a 31 158 Left 0 26 ------------------- a 152 Cast Approach WeIL Drive t Left Thru Right 0 0 0 265 1311 8 q � 0 1850 ( 1584 Southbound ( Northbound South Approach - Shelburne Road Wastbvund Eastbound Vehicles per hoar by movement a.m. peek hour over p.m. peak hour a.m. p.m. - 1630.1730 Table 5 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Shelburne Road, Odell Drive, and Home Averxua 1998 Design Houk Volumes With Bank Expansion North Approach - Shelburne Road Southbound Northbound 0 0 1545 1474 0 0 0 42 1379 124 Right Thru heft Right 0 109 Thru 0 0 westbound 34 171 westbound 0 341 Left 0 26 ..............0....... . Left 0 Eastbound 54 165 0 0 Thru East Approach Eastbound 531 32 Odell Drive 0 Right I 445 West Approach Home Avenue j Left Thru Right 0 0 0 265 1311 9 0 0 la52 1585 Southbound Northbound South Approach Shelburne Road Vehicles'per hour by movegent hour a.m. peak hour over p-m. peak a.m. p.m. - 1630.IM 1 £S : ST 26, 8T Hdd Lod S99 3d3Hdi,lH-1 NNt1W9I rl L9S9SS9Z88 0 TABLE 6 ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Shelburne Road, Odell Drive, and South Burlington,Vermont Home Avenue Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With Without With 1993 DJIV (1630 - 1730) Shelburne Rd. - North App. 20.8 20.8 C C Shelburne Rd. - South App. 17.3 17.3 C C Odell Dr. East App. 11.9 12.1 B B Home Ave. - West App. 13.3 13.6 B B intersection 17.9 17.9 C C 1998 DHV (1630 - 1730) Shelburne Rd. - North App. 29.2 29.2 D D Shelburne Rd. - South App. 20.5 20.5 C C Odell Drive - East App. 12.1 12.3 B B Home Avenue - West App. 15.5 15.8 C C Intersection 23.0 23.0 C C 0 ST 26, ST :33-� 8:101d S913 1'JNdN31P1 2,9S3SS9, 08 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 (802) 878-4450 - ,IAMOUREUX & STONE - Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors November 10, 1992 South Burlington Planning Commission City Hall South Burlington, Vermont RE: Proposed New Bank on Farrell Parcel - Shelburne Street Ladies & Gentlemen: 27 High Street St. Albans, Vermont 05478 (802) 524-5245 We have reviewed the Zoning Regulations and Sketch Plan entitled "O'Dell Parkway Site Plan by Wiemann-Lamphere Architects dated 10/20/92" on behalf of our client, Heathcote Associates, owners of the abutting Factory Outlet Mall. The following is an outline of questions and concerns which directly or indirectly relate to this project's impact on the Outlet Mall. These issues should be addressed before any action is taken with respect to this project. 1. Is this proposal a Planned Commercial Development (PCD)? a. If no - The new bank would need frontage on a public street, and O'Dell Parkway should become a public street (Sec. 18.109). b. If yes - Does the Farrell parcel have 350 feet of frontage? (Sec. 11.503), and a PCD should have an over-all master plan. How much of the parcel is included in the PCD? Certainly such large neighborhood holdings that appear to be developed piecemeal should include a public collector street when the land use is as intense as we now find in this case. 2. O'Dell Parkway should be a public street - "all newly constructed streets and roads serving three or more units shall be publicly owned and maintained and shall be constructed to city standards" (19.103b); "commercial streets shall have 32 feet of pavement within an 80 foot right-of-way" (19.103b); and "The Commission shall require a public street if the number of units is greater than three" ( 19.202b). 3. What is the lot coverage for this proposal, or more important, for the over-all site or land holdings? What are the future plans for the remainder of the parcel? Civil, Environmental & Transportation Engineering • Planning • Land Surveying South Burlington Planning Commission November 10, 1992 Page 2 4. Does the Shelburne Road/O'Dell Parkway intersection have a LOS of C or better? (11.504a) . 5. The Proposal should address the use of Bacon Street, the O'Dell Parkway and/or drive access points to the remaining Farrell lands, Farrell Street and the Outlet Mall lands in terms of public traffic safety and circulation (11.504d). 6. Heathcote and others have recorded easement rights on O'Dell Parkway which include "ingress and egress from and to Shelburne Street and Farrell Street". Therefore, O'Dell Parkway should extend to Farrell Street. 7. The one-way "exit only" from the Outlet Mall onto O'Dell Parkway shown on the Sketch Plan is not acceptable since the recorded easement allows "ingress and egress" and the right to "pass and repass over and across" O'Dell Parkway. How will the applicant narrow the drive and construct a new sidewalk on the Heathcote property? 8. The bike path shown on the Sketch Plan is substandard and hazardous with a 6 foot over-all width, 6 foot two-way lane with painted line in the road and sharp right angle turns (see AASHTO regulations). 9. The Ben Franklin store does not appear to have any loading area (needs 1300 square feet of loading area or 5 loading spaces). This may only be reduced by the P.C. to 50% of normal requirement (19.255). 10. The Ben Franklin parking lot entrance at O'Dell Parkway does not safely line-up with the existing Outlet Mall frontage road intersection. 11. The Sketch Plan does not show the Outlet Mall loading dock access in the rear of the building to and from O'Dell Parkway. 12. O'Dell Parkway is not centered in the 60 foot easement/right-of-way. It is 5 feet off. 13. According to Table 1 of the Regulations, the proposed Farrell bank needs stacking room for 6 cars per lane or a minimum 132 feet in length. The Plan shows 95 feet of stacking space. 14. The proposed Farrell bank will cause unreasonable congestion on the Outlet Mall property. We have performed extensive peak hour traffic modelling on the Outlet Mall South Burlington Planning Commission November 10, 1992 Page 3 site, Shelburne Road and the adjacent portion of the Farrell site (see attached model sketch sheet 1 of 2). The results, as summarized on the attached sheet 2 of 2, indicates that the Farrell Bank proposal will generate an additional 122 peak hour vehicles to travel through the Outlet Mail lands between Shelburne Road via the south access and west frontage road and O'Dell Parkway. We intend to continue our review of this proposal. In the meantime, please contact our firm if there are any questions. Sincerely, Leonard A. Lamoureux, P.E., L.S. o-d\9284sout.11 LAMOUREUX & STONE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 Morse Drive ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 (9021 979-4450 MWW2DHIsmft*)2*1AW&Woft,soon.w.mm.ToONWMMraLFREE 14*225 xe JOB SHEET OF Z CALCULATED BY V, L DATE CHECKED BY DATE JOB i (- C I , ( � ( L I a LAMOUREUX & STONE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 Morse Drive ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 / (802) 878-4450 SHEET NO. Z' OF Z' CALCULATED BY Lrl L-- DATE h-7L- CHECKED BY I SCALE DATE r'cM.X ........... ,.... 1 '7:?A.izF.IL W i-r oJF ot(_�1� .....t......... ..... .,........ .. ... .................... : i , . ... .. 9 L]"rYd A t G E-.SS i i N MA Wt'L 1"C 'f7.1 . ......... A cc te-`5 4rz41 PPAdW2*100 YW) M-t (Padded) ® * Groton, Um 01471. To Order PHONE TOLL FREE I-W221M 3• PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 12, 1985 of a 25.4 acre parcel into two lots of 7.85 and 17.55 acres as shown on the plan entitled "Tilley Farm, Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vermont" dated 1%21%85 and revised 3 6 85 as prepared by Donald L. Hamlin _with the following stipulations 1. The new entrance road shall be a 60 foot right of way, with 32 feet of__,pavement with a temporary turnaround at the end. 2. The pond which is shown on the plan to the north of the proposed road shall be bermed. 3. The final plat shall be recorded with the City Clerk within 90 days. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion and all voted aye. Final plat application of David Farrell for resubdivision of a lot into tw new sized lots measuring 4.10 acres and 8.94 acres, at former Lakeside Te 70 Farrell Street Mr. Crampton said Champlain College was going to purchase the lot which is now the Lakeside Tennis property. The 60' strip of land will be allocated to the surrounding Farrell property. Mrs. Maher moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission improve the final plat application of David M. Farrell and Vermont Federal Bank for the subdiyision of lots into 2 new sized lots of 4.10 acres and 9.2 acres as depicted on a 2 page set of plans entitled "Final Plan, Subdivision of David M. Farrell Property" as prepared b George E. Bedard, dated 99 3 84 and revised 1 7F qc; on th tha fnl lnwing stipulations: 1. A record copy shall be filed with the City Clerk_ within 90 days showing the entirety of the two lots and the new acreage. 2. Land or easements for the corrections/on Farrell Street shall be deeded to the City. Mr. Belter seconded the motion. Mr. Poger said he would like to seea plan �fr the overall use of the area and Mr. Crampton said they would be in in 6 months to a year with one. Mr. Crampton noted that Farrell Street had been constructed in the wrong location in the 1960's and that will be corrected now (stipulation #2). The motion carried unanimously. Site plan application, Burlington International Airport for a 25,700 sq. ft. addition to the terminal and associated site work, Airport Drive Mr. James Lamphere said they would like to make a two-story expansion of the existing terminal building. They will also be purchasing the Lavalette,. land. The fuel farm will be moved and site work will be done in the car rental parking area. Three jetways will be added, plus a large departure lounge. Mr. Lamphere said the Master Plan for the airport showed major expansion from 1983-1984. He felt the major growth had already occurred and that things would now level off. Dr. Oppenlander has done a traffic analysis and concluded that the present access will be adequate through 1995• Mr. Lamphere noted that the terminal parking area had been expanded. When it reaches capacity, shuttle buses run between the terminal and other parking areas around the airport. Mr. Poger felt there was a parking problem now and - 4at VERMONT FEDERAL BANK, FSB, a United States corporation having a place of business in Burlington and State of Vermont in the County of Chittenden Grantor in the consideration of --------Vermon---Ten and More ---------- paid to its full satisfaction b Dollars DAVID M. FARRELL Of South Burlington in the County of Chittender. and State of Vermont Grantee have REMISED, RELEASED, AND FOREVER QUITCLAINIED unto the said DAVID M. F: LRELL, his all right and title which heirs or assigns, VERMONT FEDERAL BANK, FSB successors certain piece of land in Souor its kzins have in, and to a County of South Burlington in the follows, viz: Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as A vacant parcel of land situated on the westerly side of Farrell Street more particularly bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a survey marker in the westerly sideline of Farrell Street, is the southeasterly corner of property acquired by David M. Farrell by Warrantying Deed of Thomas A. Farrell dated February 27, 1973 and recorded in the South ,.i Burlington Land Records in Volume 108 at Pages 484-485; thence proceeding N 70 a t.r" W a distance of 517.82 feet to a point marked by a survey marker; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 19°20'50" E a distance of 60.00 feet �. to a point h70'32marked by a survey marker; thence turning to the right and proceeding S '10" E a distance of 526.02 feet to a point marked by a survey marker in t e westerly sideline of Farrell Street; thence turning to the right and proceed- I ing S 27°08'10" W along the said westerly sideline of Farrell Street a distance of 60.54 feet to the point and place of beginning. Said premises are stated to contain 31,315 square feet or 0.72 acres, more or less and are designated as Parcel "A" on a certain map or plan entitled ""Final Plan" Subdivision of David M. Farrell South Burlington, Vermont Scale - 1" = 40' p n a;. Sept. 3� 1984 prepared by G. E. Bedard, Inc. and revised 1/25/85, which is of 4 record in Map Book Page 63 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Being all the rig t title and interest of the Grantor in the above -described 6Dparcel of land a quired by deed of the Grantee, of record in Volume *a\'(I,, Page of said FInd records, and by Judgment and Decree of Foreclosureof Chittenden Supior Court, Docket No. S962-82 CnC in the matter of Vermont Federal Bank, B v. Burlington Tennis Associateset al., a certified copy of which, togethek with a Certificate of Non -redemption, is of record in Volume t Q-LQ:, Page of said land records. ff� 3 -��- gL> LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED - - PROPERTY LINE - - - - - - - - - - - - EDGE OF PAVEMENT/CURB 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I a I O 1 � I w I z LIC I Z I � HOME AVENUE 'WO OUTLET" SIGN 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I �.f 1r1N1111011lOAlrrlllTO: •!N PRAIKLr m rRIOR Ferwm HADLEY ROAD R.O.W. SUNKEN CURB SIDEWALK N/F N/F I N/F I N/F I N/Fl I N/F I N/F I I N/F G. k W. I L. k L. I B. BARNEY I T. k P. I L.P. BROKS R. k M. F, k J. W.C. GRIGGS BROOKS J. KAHAN HASKINS I REDFIELD I KOCHMAN I I PEARSON I M. STARKMA N/F J k 8 SNYDER — I N/F ii W. WOLFE II I, BACON STREET 1 ---------------T r-- 1 1 —7 Ls. <� f Di5HL5 I I I I 9� I II Y U I I I I (y I PROPOSED R' rt I 1 ANTENNA [STOCKADE FENCE N/F N/F „Y OI WVNr / A. k R. CHAMPLAIN OIL CO. INC. REYERS e e r a� I II I HAW WASH N • [!0 PAVAO •lAwAV CAA ID 6.AC!• CNTT[HD[N SAWS FIIOLICUSE 410V • 100 OENENAI M1,000 V • 700 VAV'AMWA O .l.AC[f SAWNNO MATS••S tT • S 0lAT01O. 1 CW00 ANA 10.l11 f ZO 5./01 t]} PACf! P 1 ].171 •[ • ]00wwAO 2LSEAL1.I TOTAL R[DU11[D I[MCU1D11N0 OVfNAM }.. 6..T L AOWOf TOTAL 11. 11ACII AWAC[M PooR [o S.AC]} DP DO• TO ]•• PAC[[ .CURB[— HAS A NAK1Arl•1 OF SO rrLOT![• ON SM PIIOM }:00 WA TD •:00 — M[LOUPS CO Gff WI ON —LIN W W •r1 PMNKm LOT IN 11.21 AF. 11.1sm. KDO. ANA 1.00 A[, 0.0D M KDO, MI1ClN[Aa 11.4r •.]r ALLOY/!D So.o% •O.Or Lot COVMAO! wI SON IxAN um WW I}[N FNAMIL. LOT Gov. AIWA 0.03 AA. 5.s1 m. LOT Gov. x 51 .O "LOWED 70x 00.I x 70.0% ,��-i.�r3.T•r•rnn. :�M�•�It• [ i gal AI [ SOUTH BURLINGTON FACTORY OUTLET CENTER N/F HEATHCOTE ASSOCIATES PHILIP MEHLER REALTY GRAPHIC SCALE r r ( p RSt ) cl i BAMBINOS I •1 F.. Talot APR 02 1993 City of So. Burlington LANDSCARNO SCHEDULE SIZE QUANTITY o A, DWARF FLOWERING ALMOND 2.5 GAL 30 B. LITTLEAF LINDEN 1.5' CAL 22 C. RED OAK 1.6' CAL 42 ♦ ANDORRA JUNIPER - 24' O.C. E.W. 1 GAL 16 DUMPSTER, C•J TREE r C 5 SHRUB �+tf' • O FENCE LIGHTING LEASE LINE I I I I N/F BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, INC. I I L----------------- —7--------�-J 1 1 _ _I _ .. _ _N7UIlE ►ARItM10 I— _ — � I 1 1 1 ._L. --I- - fir•. In / I j � I 1480 I N/F R.M. STEVENS JOY DRIVE ?t72 N/F OLYMPIAD COURT ASSOCIATES I I /70 .N/F OLYMPIAD COURT ASSOCIATES I I a / GARDENS FOR ALL, INC. $ , 1 1 � 1 � 1 � IRREVOCABIF OFFER OF DEDIC I I FROM NEW ENTERPRISES, INC. I CITY OF SOUTH OURLINGTON r (FUTURE MIKE PATH LOCATION) N/F NEW ENTERPRISES, INC. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 9, 1993 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: N ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and myself. Comments from Fire Chief Jim Goddette were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, April 13, 1993 to represent your request. If you have any questions, Encls JW/mcp cc: David Marshall please give me a call. i cere y1 J e Weith, City Planner CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P. O. Box 485 (802) 985-2323 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 Fax No. (802) 985-2271 CHARLES R. DUNHAM President STEPHEN A. VOCK Vice President April 2, 1993 JEAN -CAROL DeNHAM Mr. Raymond J. Belair Zoning & Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: O'Dell Park PCD Preliminary Plan Submittal Dear Mr. Belair: We are in receipt of your review comments dated March 19 and March 22, 1993 concerning the O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank preliminary plan application. In accordance with your request, we would like to offer the following information and five sets of revised plans in support of this application. Preliminary Planning Comments 1. In order to provide adequate space to stack six vehicles for each drive -up lane, the proposed bank building and teller locations have been moved to the north. The revised plans reflect this new building location as well as the stacking of six design length vehicles. This configuration conforms with the requirements of Table I of the Zoning Regulations while still providing unobstructed use of the cross walk. 2. The existing vacuum cleaner island depicted on Sheet C-3 is shown to be relocated northwesterly along the proposed curb line. This relocation was originally shown on Sheet C-3 and has been added to Sheet C-2. 3. There is an existing agreement that permits the applicant to use 50 spaces on the Heathcote property during the day and 100 spaces after 6:00 PM. With this supplement, the number of parking spaces required to be provided is met after 6:00 PM and is 49 spaces short during the day. Based on previous discussions with the Planning Commission, this was not an issue and they approved the sketch plan accordingly. Being cognizant of the fact that the greatest demand for parking at Bambino's (183 spaces required) will typically occur during reduced demand or non -business hours of the remaining establishments (174 spaces), it appears that adequate parking capacity will be provided. STUDIES • DESIGN • INSPECTION • TESTING SURVEYING & LAND DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULICS & HYDROLOGY SANITARY & WATER FOUNDATIONS & STRUCTURES CONCRETE & SOIL TESTING Mr. Raymond J. Belair Page 2 April 2, 1993 4. Since the parking space agreement with Heathcote expires in 1997, the applicant, as part of the master plan for the property, has depicted on the plans future parking lot with a capacity of 103 spaces. Coupled with the 258 spaces to be constructed, the site, if required by the Planning Commission in the future, can meet the stipulated parking requirements. 5. The application now shows a painted 8' wide bike path along the south side of O'Dell Parkway. In conjunction with this, the O'Dell Parkway has been widened to 32 feet. 6. Photographs of the exterior lighting for all the existing buildings is enclosed for your review. The proposed exterior lighting for the new bank building will be limited to soffit lighting with no glare effects. Since this type is not typically reviewed, we have not included any additional information. 7. The proposed screening to be used around each dumpster is enclosed for your review. Please let us know if you would like these details included on the plans as part of the final plan application. 8. The maximum number of employees in the new bank building at one time will be eight. 9. The Reyes' name has been corrected. 10. The symbol for the lease lines has been modified so as not to be confused with the property line symbol. 11. The revised bank location provides the required 40 foot front yard setback required in the C-1 zone. 12. The items requested in the 3/5/93 letter from Joe Weith to James Lamphere were provided by 3/24/93. 13. The parking lots east of Bambino's have been revised so that no more than 30% of the paved portion falls within the 40 foot front yard setback called for in the C-1/C-2 zoning district. City Engineering PreliminaryComments 1. The street light layout along O'Dell Parkway has been revised. A new lighting plan developed by Wolbach Engineering has been included in the revised plan submittal. Mr. Raymond J. Belair Page 3 April 2, 1993 2. Pedestrian cross walks have been added to the plans at three locations: Shelburne Road intersection; Outlet Mall intersection; and at the rear entrance to the Heathcote property. 3. The 20 foot wide drainage easement depicted on Sheet C-1 has been moved westerly and has been added to Sheet C-3. 4. A note has been added on Sheet C-3 indicating that the storm sewer pipe shall be either SDR-35 PVC or HDPE (ADS brand or equivalent) pipe. 5. Rather than construct a gravel turn -around for maintenance vehicles, the applicant would prefer to provide written authorization for the City to use the PCD property adjacent to Bambino's for turning around. 6. A "No Outlet" sign has been shown to be installed at the O'Dell Parkway/Shelburne Road intersection. 7. The proposed street trees have been relocated, where possible, to the back side of the sidewalks. Fire Protection Preliminary Comments 1. The water main system between Farrell Street and the Outlet Mall can not be looped without an agreement from Heathcote Associates. Since an agreement is not forthcoming, the water main providing service to the new hydrants has been designed so that there will only be a 4.3 psi loss (at 1,500 GPM) between the residual pressure at Farrell Street and the WVNY hydrant. 2. A second hydrant has been shown to be installed at the island just southeast of the WVNY building. This location was chosen to ensure access to any of the three buildings. Bike Path Committee Preliminary Comments 1. As mentioned previously, an 8' wide painted bike lane is shown to be installed along the south side of O'Dell Parkway. Status of Applicant/Application A deed has been recorded that places all of the property of the late Thomas Farrell under the control of Trustees David M. Farrell and Stewart H. McConaughy. The name of the applicant for this application should be changed accordingly. Mr. Raymond J. Belair Page 4 April 2, 1993 An 11" x 17" reduction of Sheet C-2 has been included per your request. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 985-2323. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, David S. Marshall Project Engineer DS M: pao Enclosures cc: James Lamphere CA iul art ' c '4,,v Li- �-,Arr vr-H _ J . AIL. H � tom; 1�:) tt.,z- Gam, y T I` • - _..._ � 1--- a ° �^� .�'.� 1'Y``� L � ray" P1�-�L��." T(��'✓� II 0F.. r-.oUri 0 H.C. t'7C7 TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATION u 1 it 101-0 1-0 u wOonEN ENCLOSURE �— GRASS A 0 � CON C.CURB I x4 PRESSURE T o. i -0 POST n ��l-jUMt�10U5 r7ECORATIVE 6A�E cc N C �_> w j CANe i5O l.T ,A T, TO MA1CH r2EC0tZATIVE TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN 1 8 O'DELL PARKWAY, FARRELL PROPERTY, SHELBURNE ROAD I. City street lights are maintained by Green Mountain Power. The type proposed have to be acceptable to them. C 2. Final plans must include a road typical section also storm sewer typical. 3. If the street is to be public, a gravel turn around is required for maintenance trucks especially snow plows. Using the existing driveway is not acceptable because the plow will deposit snow in the entrance resulting in a hazardous condition. 4. The far easterly entrance drive to Bambino's must have a depressed curb across it. Also the road curb along the southerly road should be straight and it could remain when the road is extended. 5. Two 25 m.p.h. speed sign should be installed along the Shelburne Street entrance and another toward end of road. CHITTENDEN BANK - DORSET STREET 1. The proposed Dorset Street sidewalk and bike path will be constructed across the entrance drive. Plans should show it. 2. A stairway connecting the bank with the mall parking lot along the south property line such as exists between the Merchant's Bank and the Post Office on White Street would be beneficial to pedestrians. O'DELL PARK WATERSHED COVERAGES Area Description A C Avg^C CB-1 Grass 0.25 0.20 0.05 Impervious 0.23 0.90 0.21 0.48 0.26 c = 0.54 CB-2 Grass 0.02 0.20 0.004 Impervious 0.18 0.90 0.162 0.20 0.166 c = 0.83 CB-3 Grass 0.01 0.20 0.002 Impervious 0.19 0.90 0.171 0.20 0.173 c = 0.87 CB-4 Grass 0.04 0.20 0.008 Impervious 0.14 0.126 0.18 0.134 c = 0.74 CB-5 Grass 0.02 0.20 0.004 Impervious 0.15 0.90 0.135 0.17 0.139 c = 0.82 CB-6 Grass 0.12 0.20 0.024 Impervious 0.13 0.90 0.177 0.25 0.141 c = 0.564 CB-7 Grass 0.02 0.20 0.004 Impervious 0.10 0.90 0.090 0.12 0.094 c = 0.78 CB-8 Grass 0.01 0.20 0.002 Impervious 0.07 0.90 0.063 0.08 0.065 c = 0.81 CB-9 Grass 0.01 0.20 0.002 Impervious 0.03 0.90 0.027 0.04 0.029 c = 0.73 CB-10 Grass 0.01 0.20 0.002 Impervious 0.02 0.90 0.018 0.03 0.020 c = 0.67 Area Description A C Avg. C CB-11 Grass 0.02 0.20 0.004 Impervious 0.06 0.90 0.054 0.08 0.058 c = 0.73 CB-12 Grass 0.02 0.20 0.004 Impervious 0.11 0.90 0.099 0.13 0.103 c = 0.79 CB-13 Grass 0.03 0.20 0.006 Impervious 0.18 0.90 0.162 0.21 0.168 c = 0.80 CB-14 Grass 0.01 0.20 0.002 Impervious 0.22 0.90 0.198 0.23 0.200 c = 0.87 CB-15 Grass 0.01 0.20 0.002 Impervious 0.09 0.90 0.081 0.10 0.083 c = 0.83 CB-16 Grass 0.03 0.20 0.006 Impervious 0.11 0.90 0.099 0.14 0.105 c = 0.75 CB-17 Grass 0.06 0.20 0.012 Impervious 0.67 0.90 0.603 0.73 0.615 c = 0.84 CB-18 Grass 0.05 0.20 0.010 Impervious 0.31 0.90 0.279 0.36 0.289 c = 0.80 CB-19 Grass 0.03 0.20 0.006 Impervious 0.48 0.90 0.432 0.51 0.438 c = 0.86 CB-20 Grass 0.20 0.20 0.040 Impervious 0.51 0.90 0.459 0.71 0.499 c = 0.70 CB-21 Grass 0 0.20 0 Impervious 0.11 0.90 0.099 0.11 0.099 c = 0.90 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Q Re: Preliminary Comments April 13, 1993 agenda items Date: March 19, 1993 GOODRICH LOT - 550 HINESBURG ROAD 1. Drainageway of Potash Brook crossing Hinesburg Road is in poor condition and needs replacement. It has plugged and backed water for quite a distance. The finished floor of this building should be at an elevation higher than the elevation of Hinesburg Road where the brook crosses. The contours on the plan are not to U.S.G.S. datum so it is difficult to check. 2. The sidewalk along the frontage should be extended to the Winding Brook development driveway so it can be used. 3. The parking lot should drain toward the north not the east as plan shows. 4. Existing sewer main continues southerly. It should be shown on the plans. CHITTENDEN BANK - DORSET STREET 1. The proposed Dorset Street sidewalk and bike path will be constructed across the entrance drive. Plans should show it. 2. A stairway connecting the bank with the mall parking lot along the south property line such as exists between the Merchant's Bank and the Post Office on White Street would be beneficial to pedestrians. O'DELL PARK - SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Sixteen street lights on a street length of 1,000 feet is excessive. 2. Pedestrian cross walks shall be shown on the plans and constructed. Preliminary Memo - City Engineer April 13, 1993 agenda items March 18, 1993 Page 2 3. The 18 inch storm sewer draining southerly shall knclude a 20 foot easement for maintenance and repair. 4. Storm sewer pipe shall be plastic or concrete. 5. The street end shall include a gravel turn -around for maintenance vehicles. 6. A dead end or no through street signs shall be installed. 7. Trees should be placed back of the sidewalk where there is more room and away from street lights. VALLEE FARM SUBDIVISION - SPEAR STREET 1. A driveway 2600 feet long will be expensive to maintain. 2. Drive will require additional culverts which should be shown on the plans. CALKINS RESUBDIVISION - CALKINS COURT Subdivision plan dated 11/11/92, last revised on 1/11/93 prepared by Vermont Land Surveyors is acceptable. ST - Iq F. V a �i OJ y' H Line Segment ,� �� ,� s ,� � �, � , � ,;, � �.� �•� ro Time to Inlet O O o O O U o o p Time in Pipe Accumulated Time rJ G G a o n C3 O G O O G O d D -� AI Entering Catch N d J 6 r� — G -� 6 "' Basin _ 0 O O O v 0 0 o O rn Sum ofCA in System llj Lj � �J .P .9 ll'� �>-� U� lid l'f tTl �)� � lfl Ul t�l lJ� .� l}•1 f•_ Rainfall Intensity o - p (11) 0.i � C, - co N — ou <.� �j C:; r� c; .3 ��, uj P @ in System J J (U 0 tJ 1,3 GG l5� J r� ' , '' �• t� N � Pipe Size J lr A � �� ` C, 01 f C� C� �' O Length of Pipe r _ - W tJ 0 O C� lT1 O - O O � -j G- r �� �� In cr s CC ti' Ct r Slope i �» U' 4- JJ �' � H Average Velocity iJ f� tJ G (G J L P J N N JNN ; w Full Capacity Cc t� uj t, ,3 o O C) Q .� 0 C)� J�� Headwater Hw v l(� O CA 3 �• �'� rN Y N s � Iln' ON I-aau5 q paxaagO L uMoy i I Nc, — j�q pauBTsaQ .mod �z�a,O �aa�ozd Line Segment T J\ ro Time to Inlet 0 kj,\ Time in Pipe `P 11, \T� IN �J\ -p- Accumulated Time AI Entering Catch Basin u 0, Sum ofCA in System 13 63 G' (IN Rainfall Intensity 4, COQ in System �p iJ \o Pipe Size Length of Pipe Cc Slope J-j TD Average Velocity Full Capacity J` 0) C) 4- Headwater U\ C' vi ins ON q-aails UMOL 2- kq pau2Ts;)(j a rl_- 3t - J 001 I Inlet .:tatloi'• are, Q:....(,r LR UR UA uf\ U1 it U' �� tin ro Time to Inlet 0 J o 0 0 0 0 u, Area in Acres I + `) o i iv p 'j CJ Runoff Coefficient N ri .' CA O� Sum ofCA IN I N (*1 I �i t• O 4 u Total CA UN li1 0 (3) L J, : , 4, =� �., i-- =r. 'N 'p °o Rainfall Intensity i ` G U ! J I ij� t lP i J va CO o a �� o Q to Inlet 3 I ?, j C S ,°.� S i o Grade of Gutter AJ U o 0 o p o G o u 0 0 p a o 8 C) O G a c 0 0 ~ Cross Slope of � i� L� _o r CO CC Shoulder I! u o o a r o - c U - c o_ Depth of Flow _ 7z ,s (A i� p >.► mil' o QP --- a at Gutter w V� - Width of Flow r� N m 0 O Bypassing Inlet G, o o 0 U O G G AI Bypassing Inlet N N O AI Entering Catch a G .IN. 0 o -- _ _ �`' Basin •off �aauS q paxoagG L agnog �VvQA-2)-v I—rzirre, c uAOI JCq Pau82saQ ED w Inlet 'j- UA s1 1 J\ M ro Time to Inlet C' w Area in Acres 0 Cf, 0 j\ co, Runoff Coefficient 0 CA, Sum of CA I-) Total CA - u, J) ol Rainfall Intensity D :j Q to Inlet 0 0 Grade of Gutter C) O D C, C; Cross Slope of 0 �'j Vj m J.'3 CP 1 _4 ~Shoulder C' CY ILE c) 0 G Depth of Flow at Gutter 41 H w Width of Flow D C Q Bypassing Inlet AI Bypassing Inlet AI Entering Catch C-1 CY\ Basin (j] 'ON q-aaqs Xq paXz)aLlo 10- _;, Umol kq paaTsaa '4z)aVo.Xcj rn DISCHARGE - (0)- CFS 01 2 3 4 3 b D 1,0 Y 3 4 5 6 • 10 20 30 somawanm.■■■m.■■■��/�..■■�.■■■���'■■■■�.■■■III/J/.I.�III./ ONE M.Nommillooll all N■II-...o�/111�■■I111%1CNi://�s1111■PA P.O /./%►.1111 �' i1 I;iFFA ===MEMNON NiiiDMu_i=f:�= i :: MEM:: ■l■EMM■■NNM■!1■ PC 5%!%/.io ■M ■M■■%2IA%• I.■►,WHAM E■N■ Ii33i " ■■■llllaP-�'ri/%SGsi$sii11■■■■�%s!% ���1 /I.' ■■moll 1111111511 jild '- p pf p EM-0150-Md IN WAZZ .PM •.....0»aa■.■.. ■■■■■ MIFA .r.rI ..i...�■■■■■■■ MOON %P1�108113%■■ OII=01II■.%/%'/2/1■■■■onil [::1■MPS / G■i0:■—t■■■■■■■■■■■■t■II.Siw-A%1w/II/ ■felt■■■■■■t � v'1l1■■■■MI11■MI11M%/ ; 2350 i11■ ■■■111 i/d•s�. 15 /1111�■■1111111111//%/.i.�lll/11BE 111111 ■■■■NME■■Ntlt■■■■■■■■■■■%///I/./.I.■/.■■■■■■t■■■■■Ott UNION 0 0■■1111■1111m■■ .111 _ . �111■1111�/MAP ■■■�.■,.iii NIS .M. • •' , 7■.■■INSTRUCTIONS LIW Of FLOW• :. AS CHART ... ■■ will .�. PRIME . No Wdomm O■/"/..I//�//mot•■� io■-■■�■MESON %prow,031 %%0111drRS:iM■■■■��■■■■■■ i■w/■1■m1 1 CHARACTERISTICFLOW ■ - . SLOPES 1CURB 0.015 .��'�■ 1 11i1 ■� ■■■ I moll■i ■ �� ■ ■■■■ Ii moll Ti■'iiIN loss 1■111n�■■■11111111i WIDTH - (X) - FEET MY sm lh7w Ld 10 u- Z Curb LLJ -11 WIDTH (B) 0 3 LENGTui I (Lb) F— 2 Pm 2B+Lb A= AREA OF CLEAR OPENING IN GRATE LL- TO ALLOW FOR CLOGGING DIVIDE P OR 0. 1.5 A BY 2 BEFORE OBTAINING d. 0 WITHOUT CURB P-2(B+Lb) = 1.0 09 CL 0.8 Ld 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 0 DISCHARGE PER SQUARE FOOT OF EFFECTIVE CLEAR OPENING 0.8 Ld 06 Ld LL- z 0.4 Ld ti 0 x LLJ 02 0 x Ld F- 01 LL- 0 n. 0 CURVE (A 000, USE CURVE (A) FOR DEPTHS OVER GRATE LESS THAN 0.8 FT 015 02 03 Ad na nc n i DISCHARGE PER FOOT OF EFFECTIVE PERIMETER BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS HYDRAULIC CAPACITY OF GRATE REV AUG. 1968 INLET IN SUMP 140 A 2 ar �Kmlljsj . $R'^^±� Y�..3g �: �i' T .:�""^,,•� � i"��.�`.'.�L'^�ST^r. �,=,�-�s• R•a-iS a-�:-' .v...^-'�� "yi•'-��� �+��,, +� '-� - - i" �s,ri"T-'�y - •^I. -a.- �e�' t JS-F-' "`-"+Vs1.>ti•: +-4t'L. �•- T }fs" <` ti' �a.A.��•-"�i�i L � .� J^�+IR� .frJ4 .Y }yy �.. y' 1� 00 20 40 30 30 Po PIPEI IN /0 20 pEp7N N06Mpl. e 7- 6- 9-- 5. /O 4 7 �I o 7 g 6 5 0,4 i o ' p0 I I 2 4 3 ; G5 03 CR/TlCAL C OU Gib � I �• y� i CURVE-- 44 Q�, e N , 0/ 0�c I IC. 7 O c05 00 Is. 0 Io 1� /0 ,004 I a I I o 12w .5 /.0 .8 9 I I i. ' o c s 4 8 0 •0p15 0006 - —cc, - C;l I I D -{ O � .3 7 .6 ..00 5 .00 ooe o W 4 S p00 0002 000/5 Rj 20^ DISCHARGE - Q - CFS /7 = .0/5 A .0I 6 I .oIB I 01./ 0.2 I 0.I 3 I 0,I 4 0.1 50.1 6 —o.8 /.o 3 4 5 6 7 8 /01'iy� I I 1 I I I I 1 21 0 310 t I y 03.04 .. - .%a.•o./2 ., 3 /.0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 /O n-.024 -- ._ i .. .. , No Text I(n CHART 5 180 -- 10,000 168 8,000 EXAMPLE 1567 6,000 D•36 inches (3.0 feet) 6 (2) 5,000 0.66 cts (3) 144 4,000 tfwe Hw 5. 6. 132 3,000 0 (feet) 6. 5.-- (1) 1.8 5.4- 120 w 2,000 (2) 2.1 6.3 5. ' a 108 a (3) 2.2 6.G 4. J '0 In veer 3• 4. a — 96 1,000 3. 800 3. cc 84 In 600 - 500 2. 400- 72 LIJ 300 /� X 3 1.5 2 ? Z 60 cwi 200 Q 6 to 7 w - 0 54 a t._ w_ -2 w 100 / ._. 51- > - 48 a - 80� o J Q _ = 60 Z o a 4O a w w j ` o ..- g-- -T-- • 36 �- 30 tlYl ENTRANCE\ Ir Ili _ p SCALE TYPE' W 33 a o- e 20 O) Headwall' \j o 8 .8 - 30 F- (2) NCR conform / W to slops. _ Li — 0 27 10 (3) Projecting - .7 o. 8 7 a - 24 6 to 5 To use seal* (2) or (3) project 21 4 horizontally to.scale (1). then - 6 use straight inclined line through •6 3 D and 0 scales, or reverse as IS illustrated. 2 15 .5 .7 .6 _ 12 HEADWATER DEPTH FOR BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROAOS JAN, 1963 5-25 C. M. PIPE' CULVERTS WITH INLET CONTROL TABLE 2; DURATION FACTORS Duration (=mutts) Factor Duration (minutes) Factor i......................... 2.22 40........................ 0.8 10........................ 1.71 60........................ 0.7 li............... 1.44 60............... 0.6 23........................ 1.25 90......._................ 0.5 33........................ 1.0 123 ......... :............. 0.1 TABLE 4: RECURRENCE INTERVAL FACTORS Recurrence interval '(years) �artor 1--------------=----------------- 0.75 2-------------------------------- 1. 0 5---------------=---------------- 1.3 10------------------------------- 1.6 25------------------------------- .1:9 b0------------------------------- 2.2 FIGURE 2: VERIONT 2 YEAR, 30 MINUTE RAINFALL INTENSITY TABLE 3: DURATION FACTORS (FROM A CURVE BASED ON TABLE 2 VALUES) ,:,:ll Sfn O.O 0.1 lo.z 10.3 0.4 O.S O•G 0.1 as a,? s Z.22 Z.2/ 1 2.20 2.1(3 Z. /7 Z.16 Z 14 2.13 Z. I I z 10 G Z.n' Z.os 2.'Y' 2.os 204 z.03 2.oz. Z.61 0.00 1.Cn l 1.97 /-' (& ).°S /.94 1.93 1.92 1.91 R90 1.6° 1.8,E 9 1.87 /. 6& z 15S A 35 1.84 163 1921 182 1. 81 1. 0 17'? 11.16 07 01 1.76 1.761 1.75 1--74 03 071 l 0 1.71 1.7) 1.30 1. 6c) 1.68 ).681 1. 67 1 1. 67 1. 1, q 1. 63 It I. S I 1. 64 1.63 1.63 I Z I.6Z I &/ /. 60 1. &D 1. /t I.SB 1.59 157 I.5� r.S-G 1S6 !ss- 1.54 15 .52 13 L53 I.SZ /.SZ 1.5► I.SI 15-0 1.5-0 1.9-) 1 41 1.48 14 1.48 07 If 1f) 1.44 1.4G 1.45 1.45 1.44 I. 15 1. 4 f 1. 3 1.43 1.42 1. 4 Z 1.41 1141 l o 1.4 o 146 I G I.40 1. 3'1 1. --n 1. 3-1 1. 3 8 L 38 1 1.31 1.37 ). 37 1. 3 & 1? 13G 1.35 /.35 1.35 L34 1.34 1J.3,3 1.33 1.32 1.32 18 L 22 1. 32 13l /.?1 1. 31 12,5 136 1. Z°1 1. 29 1. a 19 12 8 I. Z B -).-,-T / 2 8 /. Z7 I, 27 127 /. 2G 1. ZG 1. 2 G 1. 2S 20 /. ZS 1 124 11.23 /.Z3 1. 23 /.22 ' / 22 /.2Z 21 1.21 ). 21 1.21 1.20 i ?-0 1.20 1. 20 1.19 1. lg I.19 1./7 1.17 1. IL 114 1.16 11G 23 /./s 1.15 1.15 114 1.14 1.1 1.1.3 1.13 L13 24 1.13 1.12 la I.IZ 1.12 1.IZ 1.12 1.1/ 1.I/ ).1) ZS ill )./o 1.10 11.10 /.Io I.n 1.0°1 /.0j 1.09 !03 26 103 1. c4 /. 07 /. 07 L 01 1.0-7 1. 0L 1. hb 1.06 l oz 27 I.C�, 1.05 WS /.oS 1.05 1.0 I.o4 1.0 1.04 !03 2.3 /.03 103 ).03 l.03 I.Gz 102 11.02 t oZ 162 1.02 Z9 1. G 1 1.01 I. D 1 1, 01 1. D I 1. oo 1. w 1. 00 1.06 10.) 30 1.00 1.00 l.6o oil 0.98 098 098 098 3/ o.a7 0.97 097 0.97 0.9I 0A6 0.96 096 69& 0.95 32 O i5 O.yS O.aS 09 J•cY 094 094 0.93 0.`f3 0--U 3s 093 0--u 0.9Z 0-oz o•y2 0.9Z 0.9/ 0-1)) 0:3/ . 24 ayo a-)o Coo o.ao a`')6' o-qq 0 0.0'7 0.&1 aac 35 0. 85 0. p. gyI a 6310. 6-) 1 0.37 o.e7 148V 0.87 0.8& H The 13urlington_1free WC55 0 PUBLIC HEARING BU111LOW014 SoUTM PNN1M0 P.O. Box 10 COMMIss10N 1 Burlington, VT 05402-0010 h Burlington The S°uty ission will Planning Commat n hold a pu gurlin9 ton pity t South ROOm, the nterence Hall, CO treat, South Dorset S on 575 Burlington, ri 13 g93 at Tuesday. t -- 7:30 P. to consider the AD/INVOICE NO. START DATE S following: / 1) Revised Final Plat aot of Landrum for PUBLICATION plication _ construction of a 15,820 } a°aquae tO120 square 597ot used tor IL tooting TELEPHONE NUMBER SALESPERSON t building ((pprinting, manuf Press ngninesburg Lane r - 1 Road. TIMES_ ' LINES CLASSIFICI Final Plat ap- 2) Revised Cal - f to of Pemend a tO six , ADD. CIJG/CRD. BOX CHARGE ►tins roved helot colmmerpeal subdivi ( Calkins Court. Sion. 3) Preliminary Plat aPPli- Farrell ` "` t " r - T cation of Thomas for a planned commercial 1 1 J . �. _ r ? T development consisUnWah bank building r _ e new rOUgh service, drive-th exist- car wash existingg exist- n office building, t bar i g I inrestauran g� and leased park- Ben _ -. . bu1'dlo9'the adjoin ng I ;nianklin business, Shel 9 burns Road. r the application Copies of e for public at available South ctlion CCityth ll Bur 9 William Burgess Chairmanrlingtomin South B Comssion Planning March 27, 1993 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PRELIMINARY PLAT 1) Name of Applicant: Thomas Farrell 2) Name of Subdivision: O'Dell Park 3) Submit Subdivision Fee: $30.00 4) Describe Subdivision (i.e. total acreage, number of lots or units, type of land use, gross floor area for commercial or industrial uses): Total gross floor square footage for this PCD is 58,830 square feet (with Ben Franklin). Total acreage is to be 11.19 acres which will be principally made up of four properties (without Ben Franklin = 0.42 ac.). 5) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone numbers of owner of record, applicant, or contact person since Sketch Plan Application: N/A 6) Name, address, and phone number of: a) Engineer: Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 95 Falls Road P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 985-2323 b) Surveyor: George Bedard, L.S. G.E. Bedard, Inc. Box 320, RD 1 Hinesburg, Vermont 05461 482-3494 c) Architect: Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 655-5020 d) Plat Designer: Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 1 7) Indicate any changes to the subdivision such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, etc., since Sketch Plan Application: No changes since Sketch Plan except that O'Dell Parkway R.O.W. to be dedicated to the City will run on a portion of land N/F New Enterprises, Inc. 8) List names and mailing addresses of owners of record of all contiguous properties: See attached. 9) State title, drawing number, date of original plus any revisions, and designer(s) of the preliminary map(s) accompany this application: Survey Plat - Sheet C-1 Site and Landscaping Plan - Sheet C-2 Site Utilities Plan - Sheet C-3 10) COST ESTIMATES for Planned Unit Developments, multi -family and commercial and industrial complexes. a) Buildings: $180,000 b) Landscaping: $12,600 c) All other site improvements (e.g., curb work): $282,400 11) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC for Planned Unit Developments, multi -family projects, and commercial and industrial complexes (2-way traffic, in plus out): See Trans -Op Report 12) Attach FIVE copies and ONE reduced copy (11 x 17) of preliminary map showing the following information: a) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title and the name of the City. b) Name and address of owner of record, subdivider and designer of Preliminary Plat. 2 c) Number of acres within the proposed subdivision, location of property lines, structures, watercourses, wooded area, and other existing physical features. d) The names of all subdivisions immediately adjacent and the names of owners of record of adjacent acreage. e) The location and size of any existing sewers and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdivided. f) Location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks and other public or privately maintained open spaces as well as similar facts regarding adjacent property. g) Contour lines at intervals of five feet, based on United States Geological Survey datum of existing grades and also of proposed finished grades where change of existing ground elevation will be five feet or more. h) Complete survey of subdivision tract by a licensed land surveyor. i) Numerical and graphic scale, date and true north arrow. j) Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes. k) Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes. 1) If on -site sewage disposal system is proposed, location and results of tests to ascertain subsurface soil, rock and ground water conditions, depth to ground water unless pits are dry at depth of five feet, location and results of percolation tests. m) Provisions for collecting and discharging storm drainage in the form of drainage plan. n) Preliminary designs of any bridges or culverts which may be required. Cl o) The location of temporary markers adequate to enable the Commission to locate readily and appraise the basic layout in the field. Unless an existing street intersection is shown, the distance along a street from one corner of the property to the nearest existing street intersection shall be shown. p) All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and the conditions of such dedication or reservation. 13) Development timetable (including number of phases, and start and completion dates): Mid -summer start-up and early Fall 1993 completion. 14) List the waivers applicant desires from the requirements of these regulations: - Horizontal alignment of subdivision roads. - Acknowledgement of overlapping parking requirements. - Parking within building set back areas. 15) 1) All existing subdivision, approximate tract lines and acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of the records owners of all adjacent parcels of land, namely those directly abutting or directly across any street adjoining the proposed subdivision. 2) Locations, widths and names of existing, filed or proposed streets, curb cuts, easements, building lines and alleys pertaining to the proposed subdivision and to the adjacent properties as designated in Paragraph 1 above. 3) An outline of the platted area together with its street system and an indication of the future probable street system of the remaining portion of the tract, if the Preliminary Plat submitted covers only part of the subdivider's entire holding. Signature of Applicant or Contact Person 4 Date CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. Box 485 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 (802) 985-2323 TO Planning Department City of South Burlington ***Hand Carried*** March 23, 1993 Boa N� 93108 ATTENTION Mr. Ray Belair RE 'Dell Park > WE ARE SENDING YOU ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: Shop drawings 0 Prints ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. I DESCRIPTION 5 1 O'Dell Park PCD — Revised THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: REMARKS ❑ For approval ® For your use R As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US Ray: Rather than include Heathcote Associates as a co —applicant on this project, the applicant has opted to modify the proposed curbcuts on O'Dell Parkway to match the existing access roads to the Heathcote property. With these revisions, there will be no need to undertake improvements on the Heathcote property. This should satisfy the requirements of Joe Weith's March 5, 1993 letter to Mr. James Lamphere. Please note that additional revisions will be forthcoming based on the most recent staff reviews. COPY TO J. Lamphere SIGNED: David S. Marshall -es Ina..G,&n.Mn 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 22, 1993 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some comments from the Recreation Path Committee regarding the above referenced project which should have been included with the comments sent on 3/19/93. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincere- y, c Raymon J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: David Marshall JAN93.MEM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Recreation Path Committee RE: proposed developments DATE: January 5, 1993 The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee met Monday evening, January 4, 1993. The committee reviewed sketch plans and other materials presented for the Green Acres Industrial Park. The committee had several questions and recommendations: a. questions: 1. Are there any regulated wetlands (or other restrictions) on or near the property that the committee should be aware of? 2. Will the developer be constructing Swift Street Extension as drawn on the sketch plan (including the portion between Hinesburg Road and the north boundary of the developer's property)? Will it include sidewalks or bike paths? When will the portion of Swift Street Extension between its: current terminus at the Village at Dorset Park and Hinesburg`Road be constructed? Will it include sidewalks or bike paths? b. recommendations: 1. The developer should donate a 5- easement along the north border of the property from the point where Swift St. Ext. meets the property, eastward to the back of Lot #7. This, combined with the existing 15' easement along the south border for the adjacent property, will provide the desired 20' easement for a recreation path. Within this easement, the developer should build a paved 8' wide recreation path. This will provide a connection between sidewalk or paths along Swift St. Extension and easements in the eastern section (undeveloped) part of the property. Access to the path from the north ends of the proposed Goodrich and Vosburgh Lanes should be provided. There are several rationales for this request: connecting to the new City Park and existing path segments via Swift Street as it is extended toward Hinesburg Road, 1 JAN93.MEM providing access to the industrial site for commuters while staying off -road as much as possible and taking advantage of an existing easement, a eventually providing access to the conservation and open space district along Muddy Brook, and eventual connection with Williston as part of a regional network of paths- 2- The developer should donate a 20' wide easement along the south border of the property from Hinesburg Road, eastward to the back of lot #4. Within this easement, the developer should build an 8' wide paved recreation path. There are several rationales for this request: eventually providing access from Butler Farms and existing portions of the path to the conservation and open space district along Muddy Brook, and eventual connection with Williston as part of a regional network of paths. 3. It is the Recreation Path Committee's understanding that the developer will donate 20' wide easements, as shown on the sketch plan, along Muddy Brook, along the south side of I-89, from the NE corner of Lot #7 to I-89, and from the SE corner of Lot #4 to Muddy Brook. Eventually a path can be constructed in these easements providing access to Muddy Brook and possibly connecting to Williston. O'Dell Parkway The committee questioned the advisability of a 6' wide bike lane on O'Dell Parkway, which it had requested previously. Upon reconsideration, the committee feels that an 8' wide bike lane (if possible) would be safer and more desirable- 2 PLANNER 658-7955 Ib City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 March 19, 1993 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed 'please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans by no later than Friday, April 2, 1993. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Since ly, Raymo d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encl JW/mcp cc: David Marshall PAGE #2 3. 4. Ch.i ttenden Bank Main Dn i.ve Retocati.on Tuesday ApA,i t 13, 1993 AGENDA Dmz et St-teet Th is plan was Aeviewed by the Aire department and the jott.owin.g must be coAAec ted Son emergency protection; A. The one way byp"z must be no -tus then 12' wide JoA our equipment B. Due to the upgrade on Dokset Street and the change o6 the main entAance at .teaht one hydAand .6hou,td be ,i.nztaUed on the property by the main entrance. Leland 9 Pat ic.i.a. Catkins Project # 9242 Catk.cn,s Count Lot #6 At th,i,d time I do not see a prob.tem with the .tot #6 but p.tana w.i t t have to be reviewed when they ahe ready to bu i,td ing a bu.i tding on the propeh ty. 5. New Bank Buitd.ing O'DeU Pa&k PAo1ect 093108 P.tan waa Aeviewed and the 6ottow.in.g shou-td be done 6oA emergency protection; A. The main water system Urom Fa,vAett Road and the factory matt shoutd be a .coop system. B. A second hydrant ahou.td be .instatted near the new bank and the WVNV bu.i td ing . City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 5, 1993 Mr. James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Farrell Application, Bank Facility, Shelburne Road Dear Jim: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 After further review of the preliminary plat application submittal for the above referenced project, I have determined the application to be incomplete. The proposed access changes to the Heathcote property will require the submittal and approval of a revised final plat for the Heathcote property. In addition, the owners of the Heathcote property will need to be the applicant or coapplicant. I apologize for the delay in contracting you, however, I was waiting for an opinion from the City Attorney as to whether the items discussed above were required. I will hold a space on the April 13, 1993 Planning Commission agenda if you submit either of the following items to this office by March 24, 1993. 1. A revised site plan showing the entire Heathcote property including the proposed access changes. A completed sketch plan application form which identifies the owners of the Heathcote property as applicants or coapplicants, including signature, or 2. Revised plans for the Farrell property which do not propose any changes to the Heathcote property. Mr. James Lamphere Farrell Application March 5, 1993 Page 2 Please contact me if you have any JW/mcp cc: Ray Belair Steve Stitzel Chris Bishop Dave Marshal questions. Si ce e Weith, it Planner ITT� CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P. O. Box 485 (802) 985-2323 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 Fax No. (802) 985-2271 CHARLES R. DUNHAM President February 18, 1993 STEP ViceHEN A. VOCK Vice President JEAN -CAROL DUNHAM Treasurer Mr. Joe Weith South Burlington City Planner 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Traffic Report - O'Dell Park Dear Joe: Please find enclosed a copy of the traffic report that Joseph Oppenlander developed for the intersection of Shelburne Road, O'Dell Drive and Home Avenue. The conditions for which Mr. Oppenlander based his traffic performance evaluations in his November 6, 1992 report are consistent with the recently submitted site plan for O'Dell Park. If you should need any additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, /Z r` Stephen A. Vock SAV:pao Enclosure STUDIES • DESIGN • INSPECTION • TESTING SURVEYING & LAND DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULICS & HYDROLOGY SANITARY & WATER FOUNDATIONS & STRUCTURES CONCRETE 8 SOIL TESTING CIVIL ENGINEERING P. O. Box 485 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 February 17, 1993 Mr. Joe Weith South Burlington City Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: O'Dell Park PCD - Preliminary Plat Submittal Dear Mr. Weith: ASSOCIATES, INC. (802)985-2323 Fax No. (802) 985-2271 CHARLES R. DUNHAM President STEPHEN A. VOCK Vice President JEAN -CAROL DUNHAM Treasurer Please find enclosed for your review the following information regarding the preliminary plat submittal for O'Dell Park situated between Shelburne Road and Farrell Drive. 1. PCD application. 2. $30.00 PCD preliminary plat application fee. 3. Five copies of: C-1 Survey Plan; C-2 Site and Landscaping Plan; and C-3 Site Utility Plan. 4. One copy of 11" x 17" reductions of plans. 5. Catalog cuts of GE lighting to be used along O'Dell Parkway and cutoff lighting to be used in circulation and parking areas. 6. One copy of approval by James Goddette on fire -related issues. The primary contact for this project will be Mr. James Lamphere of Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects, Inc. All questions should be directed to him. Additional information on the projected traffic movements will be forthcoming from Dr. Joseph Oppenlander, P.E. at Trans -Op, Inc. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, C David S. Marshall, P.E. Project Engineer DSM:pao Enclosures cc: James Lamphere STUDIES • DESIGN • INSPECTION • TESTING SURVEYING 8 LAND DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULICS R HYDROLOGY SANITARY 8 WATER FOUNDATIONS & STRUCTURES CONCRETE 8 SOIL TESTING O'DELL PARK LIST OF ABUTTERS February 11, 1993 Owner Name and Address Property Address Champlain Oil Co., Inc. P.O. Box 2126 510 Shelburne Road So. Burlington, VT 05407 So. Burlington, VT Albert J. & Rita J. Reves Box 435 17 Bacon Street Londonderry, VT 05148 So. Burlington, VT John T., Sr. & Bernice T. Snyder 490 Shelburne Road Same So. Burlington, VT 05403 Glendon R. & Willa M. Griggs 29 Hadley Road Same So. Burlington, VT 05403 Louise P. Brooks 33 Hadley Road 33 Hadley Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 67-69 Hadley Road Bernard B. Barney Joel Kahan Marvin Starkman 37 Hadley Road Same So. Burlington, VT 05403 Theodore F. Haskins 65 Hadley Road Same So. Burlington, VT 05403 O'Dell Park List of Abutters Page 2 Ronald M. & Margaret M. Redfield 71-73 Hadley Road Same So. Burlington, VT 05403 Frank L. & Jennifer K. Kochman 75 Hadley Road Same So. Burlington, VT 05403 William C. Pearson 89 Hadley Road Same So. Burlington, VT 05403 Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc. 95 Kennedy Dr. 75 Farrell Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 So. Burlington, VT Olympiad Court Associates J. Richard Corley 70 Farrell Street 70 Farrell Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 72 Farrell Street New Enterprises, Inc. Frederick P. Tiballi 110 Main Street 65 Farrell Street Burlington, VT 05401 So. Burlington, VT Heathcote Associates Philip Mehler Realty 540-560 Shelburne Road 488 Madison Avenue 570 Shelburne Road (T.J. Maxx) New York, NY 10022 Brian V. & Hollace J. Reed 80 Hadley Road Same So. Burlington, VT 05403 O'Dell Park List of Abutters Page 3 David K. & Steven M. Miner 86 Hadley Road Same So. Burlington, VT 05403 Warren Wolfe 138 Woodlawn Road 20 Bacon Street Burlington, VT 05401 So. Burlington, VT Gardens For All, Inc. 180 Flynn Avenue 60 Farrell Street Burlington, VT 05401 So. Burlington, VT Roger & Brenda Hutchins Green Bush Road South 521 Shelburne Road Charlotte, VT 05445 So. Burlington, VT Antonio B. Pomerleau 69 College Street 555 Shelburne Road Burlington, VT 05401 So. Burlington, VT ,r-'< - /) CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P. O. Box 485 (802) 985-2323 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 Fax No. (802) 985-2271 CHARLES R. DUNHAM President STEPHEN A. VOCK Vice President JEAN -CAROL DUNHAM Treasurer February 5, 1993 Mr. William Szymanski, P.E. South Burlington City Engineer So. Burlington City Offices 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vt 05403 Re: O'Dell Parkway Meeting Minutes Dear Bill, Thank you for taking the time to meet with myself and Dennis Webster on Thursday to discuss the design approach for O'Dell Parkway. We have summarized our discussions in the enclosed meeting minutes. Please review them in the next two weeks and let me know if any clarifications need to be made. We have also enclosed for your use a 1" = 100" plan of the preliminary drawing we reviewed. Respectfully, David S. Marshall, P.E. Enclosures cc: D. Webster J. Weith Idsm\ode112 STUDIES • DESIGN • INSPECTION • TESTING SURVEYING 8 LAND DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULICS R HYDROLOGY SANITARY 9 WATER FOUNDATIONS R STRUCTURES CONCPFTE 8 SOIL TFSTING MEETING MINUTES DATE: February 4, 1993 TIME: 11:00 A.M. LOCATION: So. Burlington City Offices IN ATTENDANCE: Bill Szymanski, So. Burlington City Engineer Dennis Webster, Wiemann-Lamphere Architects Dave Marshall, Civil Engineering Associates PROJECT: O'Dell Parkway, So. Burlington, Vermont Discussion: 1. Based on a review of projected pedestrian movements, it was agreed that a 5' wide sidewalk would be constructed on the north side of O'Dell Parkway from Route 7 to Bambino's. A 5' wide sidewalk would be constructed on the south side from Route 7 to the northwestern Outlet Mall access. The section from the northwestern most access to Bambino's would be dedicated to green space since pedestrians moving from the back parking lot of the Outlet Mall to the front would most likely use the paved access on the north side of the building. Bill Szymanski indicated that he was concerned with north -south pedestrian movements at the northwest corner of the Outlet Mall building and at Bambino's. It was agreed that crosswalk markings would be added at those locations. 2. Due to the fact that O'Dell Parkway will need to be constructed to City standards while also trying to tie into existing conditions without reconstructing a larger than necessary area, it was agreed that the sidewalks would ramp down to meet existing grade at each of the access drives off of O'Dell Parkway. Bill Szymanski did indicate that the curbing at each of these access drives would have to be continuous with the top of the depressed curb creating a 11/2" lip. The elevation of the sidewalk that crosses each access drive could not be lower than the top of the depressed curb to minimize the potential for ponding. 3. Bill Szymanski indicated that he would be supportive of a request to vary the requirements for the horizontal alignment since this road will have a high amount of pedestrian movements and the curves as shown will help control vehicle speeds. O'Dell Parkway Minutes Page 2 February 4, 1993 4. Concerning the drainage at the site, Bill Szymanski indicated that any redirection of the runoff (that currently drains toward Hadley Road) should be towards the brook on the north side of the Davis property. He indicated that is would be preferable if the O'Dell Parkway storm drainage system could discharge at the same location. Diverting some runoff to Bacon Street would require replacing the existing 8" diameter lines and dealing with the City of Burlington and runoff to Englesby Ravine. 5. The meeting was adjourned 11:55 a.m. Respectfully submitted, David S. Marshall, P.E. DSM:pao F — — City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 29, 1993 Jamess Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the December 8, 1992 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please let me know. S' erely, , 4L w J Weith, C ty Planner 1 Encl RW/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 11, 1992 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05466 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the November 10, 1992 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. jw rely, eith, Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl DEC92.MEM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Recreation Path Committee RE: proposed developments DATE: December 8, 1992 The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee met Monday evening, December 7, 1992. The committee reviewed sketch plans and other materials presented for the Southeast Summit and the Nowland II Developments and the most recent plan for O'Dell Parkway. The committee recommends the following: Southeast Summit 1. The developer should build an 8' wide paved recreation path on the north side of the major east -west road running through the development. This will provide a potential link to a future extension of Allen Street and to a future extension of the existing recreation path along Dorset Street. 2. The developer should build an 8' wide paved recreation path more or less paralleling Dorset Street on the portion of the property to the east of Dorset Street. This will provide a continuation of the existing recreation path along Dorset - Street as it is extended south. This section of the path should be as far from Dorset St. as is practical considering site limitations and the necessity of connecting to the path on the north side of the property. 3. The developer should donate a 20, wide easement running north - south along the back of lots numbered 1 - 13. This will give the City the possibility of linking other neighborhoods via a recreation path in the future. 4. The developer should donate a 20' wide easement running roughly north -south along the westerh edge of the property. This will give the City flexibility in "meeting" any Shelburne path in the future. 1 DEC92.MEM Nowland II 1. The developer should build an 8' wide paved recreation path on the north side of the proposed extension of Deerfield Drive. This will provide access from the development to the existing recreation path via the sidewalk along the existing section of Deerfield Drive. 2. The developer should build an 8' wide paved recreation path running north -south along the backs of lots 58 - 92 or along the backs of lots 57 - 14. This will provide a link to future neighborhoods to the south and a possible link to Meadowood Drive or Swift Street. 3. The developer should assume the cost of a pedestrian activated traffic light at the Spear St./Deerfield Drive intersection even though it may not be needed immediately. Traffic on Spear St. is often heavy and fast, making a pedestrian crossing at this intersection potentially dangerous. This situation will be made worse as the development becomes inhabited. O'Dell Parkway A 6' wide bike lane should be marked along the south side of the proposed route of O'Dell Parkway. The objective is to connect Shelburne Road and Home Avenue with Farrell Street and the soon -to -be -constructed recreation path paralleling I-189. 2 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 9, 1992 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of a memo to the Planning Commission from the Recreation Path Committee, regarding the above project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. 1 Encl RJB/mcp w Since ely, V')AL Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant ._ .. .. __ :.....,>,...,;....r.:...:w..�wau1:.:...�a:Ks.ueusus:....:ys.a.::..,... ,...:. ..;..,. .M...................,......,.......... ...:.�.aw.«�..:..,. ,... . ..... DEC92.MEM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Recreation Path Committee RE: proposed developments DATE: December 8, 1992 The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee met Monday evening, December 7, 1992. The committee reviewed sketch plans and other materials presented for the Southeast Summit and the Nowland II Developments and the most recent plan for O'Dell Parkway. The committee recommends the following: Southeast Summit 1. The developer should build an 8' wide paved recreation path on the north side of the major east -west road running through the development. This will provide a potential link to a future extension of Allen Street and to a future extension of the existing recreation path along Dorset Street. 2. The developer should build an 8' wide paved recreation path more or less paralleling Dorset Street on the portion of the property to the east of Dorset Street. This will provide a continuation of the existing recreation path along Dorset Street as it is extended south. This section of the path should be as far from Dorset St. as is practical considering site limitations and the necessity of connecting to the path on the north side of the property. 3. The developer should donate a 20, wide easement running north - south along the back of lots numbered 1 - 13. This will give the City the possibility of linking other neighborhoods via a recreation path in the future. 4. The developer should donate a 20, wide easement running roughly north -south along the western edge of the property. This will give the City flexibility in "meeting" any Shelburne path in the future. 1 -_ DEC92.MEM Nowland II 1. The developer should build an 8' wide paved recreation path on the north side of the proposed extension of Deerfield Drive. This will provide access from the development to the existing recreation path via the sidewalk along the existing section of Deerfield Drive. 2. The developer should build an 8' wide paved recreation path running north -south along the backs of lots 58 - 92 or along the backs of lots 57 - 14. This will provide a link to future neighborhoods to the south and a possible link to Meadowood Drive or Swift Street. 3. The developer should assume the cost of a pedestrian activated traffic light at the Spear St./Deerfield Drive intersection even though it may not be needed immediately. Traffic on Spear St. is often heavy and fast, making a pedestrian crossing at this intersection potentially dangerous. This situation will be made worse as the development becomes inhabited. O'Dell Parkway A 6' wide bike lane should be marked along the south side of the proposed route of O'Dell Parkway. The objective is to connect Shelburne Road and Home Avenue with Farrell Street and the soon -to -be -constructed recreation path paralleling I-189. 2 - FA7t a, L 7-1 1 f f �� 2 �c ��F 4mlow .100W e%"A 2r -16 :�- C3) ec� ool Kul�, -�4� 74t40-- II/S IWO" ec- 4v-- Z7,9�/o 7 -70 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 (802) 878-4450 I —LAMOUREUX & STONE — Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors December 4, 1992 South Burlington Planning Commission City Hall South Burlington, Vermont RE: Proposed New Site Plan for Farrell Parcel - Shelburne Street Ladies & Gentlemen: 27 High Street St. Albans, Vermont 05478 (802) 524-5245 We have reviewed the latest Sketch Plans SD-1 and SD-2 entitled O'Dell Park P.C.D. Site Plan dated 11-92 and 10-92 on behalf of our client, Heathcote Associates, who own the abutting Factory Outlet Mall. Please be advised that there are concerns about the following issues that we believe will directly or indirectly significantly impact the safety and/or welfare of the existing Factory Outlet Mall development. We are respectfully requesting that you do not approve this proposed sketch plan until all of the following basic issues have been adequately addressed by the applicant. 1. O'Dell Parkway should be designed and constructed as a public street from Shelburne Street to Farrell Street. There are enough businesses and high traffic volumes that have been created piecemeal for many years from the Farrell lands that a public O'Dell Parkway collector street should be seriously considered. This may be the last opportunity. We understand that this is also a recommendation of the City Engineer. 2. The latest proposal for O'Dell Parkway presents a 60 foot wide right-of-way from Shelburne Street to a point approximately 150 feet easterly of Shelburne Street, thence, a 45 foot wide right-of-way easterly along the Factory Outlet boundary to the Davis et al. lands. This should not be approved since a 45 foot wide right-of-way is not adequate by any standards and certainly not by City regulations. The applicant's plans do not clearly state what is to be deeded to the City. In any case, there is significant relevant information that has not been clearly presented on the plans. Please find the enclosed Attachment A, which is a copy of the applicant's sheet SD-1, where we have added and crosshatched an existing perpetual easement and right-of- way to Heathcote Associates. The other existing businesses in this complex also have a similar easement over O'Dell Parkway. This easement and right-of-way states in part Civil, Environmental & Transportation Engineering • Planning • Land Surveying South Burlington Planning Commission December 4, 1992 Page 2 that Heathcote Associates has "Full and free right and liberty for Grantee (now Heathcote Assoc.) and such successors and assigns, and its and their tenants, servants, visitors, and licenses, in common with all others now or hereafter having rights therein, with or without vehicles of any description, for all purposes connected with the use and enjoyment of the said land and premises to pass and repass over and across the strip of land described on Schedule A attached hereto for the purpose of ingress and egress from and to Shelburne Street and Farrell Street, together with the right to pave, illuminate, landscape, maintain and improve such easement and right-of- way for such purposes." Not only does this easement and right-of-way state that the Outlet Mall parcel has the rights of ingress and egress, etc., but it goes on to state that Farrell, as original grantor of the easement and right-of-way, can "not materially adversely effect the Grantee's use and enjoyment of the easement and right-of-way granted." Therefore, the main easement and right-of-way issues are: a) Why doesn't the applicant's plan show the exact location of the easement and right-of-way that is presented on Attachment A? b) Why can't the applicant grant this existing 60 foot wide easement and right-of- way to the City when they have already granted these rights to all or most of the businesses within this complex? If this is truly a planned commercial development, it should now have a well defined, designed and constructed public collector road from Shelburne Street to Farrell Street. c) It does not seem sensible to force the City to someday acquire an easement to Farrell Street from Davis et al. if at all possible, when the complex already has a well defined easement and right-of-way along the north boundary of Heathcote Assoc. and Davis et al. d) Because the easement and right-of-way deed states that the applicant can not materially adversely affect Heathcote Assoc. and others use and enjoyment of the easement and right-of-way, how can the City consider approval of a sketch plan with a portion of a parking lot, such as that shown on the plan SD-1 just east of Bambino's or even blocking the triangular so called "seeded" area between Shelburne Street, O'Dell Parkway and the north line of Heathcote Assoc. or any other obstructions within the existing O'Dell Parkway. e) Champlain Oil Co. Inc. has a 50 foot wide easement from its parcel on Shelburne South Burlington Planning Commission December 4, 1992 Page 3 Street's easterly street sideline to O'Dell Parkway. This is shown on Plan SD-2. Why doesn't this plan also show the Heathcote Assoc. 50 foot wide easement along the easterly sideline of Shelburne Street from the 60 foot wide easement to O'Dell Parkway? Heathcote Assoc. and others can use this easement and right-of-way. In addition, the Champlain Oil Co. Inc right-of-way description states in part that "Said right-of-way shall be used solely for travel by foot or in vehicles, and shall not be used for parking of any vehicles, display of merchandise, or any other purpose whatsoever." The proposed sketch plan shows 7 parking spaces in this easement. 3. The proposed Farrell bank will cause unreasonable congestion on the Outlet Mall property. As previously stated, we have performed extensive peak hour traffic analysis modelling on the Outlet Mall site, Shelburne Road and the adjacent portion of the Farrell site. The results indicate that the Farrell bank proposal will generate a minimum of an additional 122 peak hour vehicles traveling through and significantly impacting the Outlet Mall lands between Shelburne Road via the south access and west frontage road and O'Dell Parkway. This traffic impact will be higher with the recent addition of the forth drive through lane at the proposed Farrell Bank. The plan is not clearly labeled as to this lane use and dimensions. 4. A major concern is the one-way "exit only" from the Outlet Mall onto O'Dell Parkway shown on the sketch plan. This is not acceptable since the recorded easement and right-of-way allows "ingress and egress" and the right to "pass and repass over and across" O'Dell Parkway. How will the applicant narrow the drive and construct a new sidewalk on the Healthcote property? The Planning Commission should not approve this gross proposal even at sketch plan. 5. Who is the applicant on this project? The plan SD-1 states it is only Thomas Farrell. There appears to be other owners on the same plan where improvements are being proposed who should be co -applicants. Also, shouldn't all of the parties that have rights to the easement and right-of-way shown on Attachment A be parties to this City permit application at least for the development that is being proposed in the easement and right-of-way? 6. The applicant now has six curb cuts shown on O'Dell Parkway as presented on plan SD-2. At the October 13, 1992 Planning Commission meeting, it was stated during the review of the Heathcote sketch plan which presented only four Factory Outlet Mall curb cuts on O'Dell Parkway that "other members also expressed serious concerns about these curb cuts, noting that if and when O'Dell Parkway becomes a full through street, South Burlington Planning Commission December 4, 1992 Page 4 it would have these additional curb cuts to contend with". Four or five curb cuts in this segment of O'Dell Parkway are not a problem but six may be. In addition, the Champlain Oil curb cut is much too close to Shelburne Street and will be blocked by stacked traffic on O'Dell Parkway. And vehicles attempting to turn left from O'Dell Parkway into the Champlain Oil driveway will present a very hazardous situation. 7. What is the lot coverage for this proposal, or more important, for the over-all site or land holdings? What are the future plans for the remainder of the parcel? How will this impact the Heathcote property? 8. The Proposal should address the use of Bacon Street, the O'Dell Parkway and/or drive access point to the remaining Farrell lands, Farrell Street and the Outlet Mall lands in terms of public traffic safety and over-all circulation (11.504d). 9. The two way 6 foot wide bike lane on O'Dell Parkway shown on the sketch plan is substandard and hazardous with traffic opposing bicycles a few feet apart (see AASHTO regulations). 10 The Ben Franklin parking lot entrance at O'Dell Parkway does not safely line-up with the existing Outlet Mall frontage road intersection. 11. O'Dell Parkway is 5 feet off center in the 60 foot easement/right-of-way. 12. According to Table 1 of the Regulations, the proposed Farrell bank needs stacking room for 6 cars per lane or a minimum 132 feet in length. The plan shows 120 feet of staking space. We intend to continue our review of this proposal. In the meantime, please contact our firm if there are any questions. Sincerely, Leonard A. Lamoureux, P.E., L.S. cc: Philip Mehler Peter Collins 9284plan.11 ®m T-naiwii`i' GfY4v I.il. ri CN -Z - V S ~ Ul DoMb+h LFL I fi��Wv(- s I `� 1 �`� � •l,`VL PERPETUAL EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY Q. wa FACTORY OUTLET MALL AND OTHERS - �, {• Fi9I.L IG;ZrPpfP� Nl�sw Z ew fp-gpL0.1 I ntvty ppLc""wa a� m 4ae etjkw w n i y a p3- 4, CUf•UN(/jON I'?O{O�'�{ LUftl1 I � I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I II� J I E,eTFuloJr, u ps lug- I:a'-T �' nx�na5lud6 I I N/r 0AVla a1 Ac, N � I (rti7/Y�� CA7f`:17 1.Y� b-11.9� s I T 6 r2'A TA plir+uv cw rr .— Cci rj1Of- rsµrt ) vs -ram. NYN'( 11,jwG-r. 41 Vc FfUW+( U- H.." 10 lAITVFN W wr- am c•r. MIAA4 0" •�' row rr. daMar/t. ;ij mfin. K4'e IZ � PA-mWF%IWavutr xna f» TOW4 rf�lo�axcwonloanc++p) a4I jvvN ry mc, 41* 4nac /S Lu+i w . rw- City of So. Burlington ATTACHMENT A (b) This approval specifically disapproves the lease or licensing of any common area space on a permanent or temporary basis. It is the intent of this condition to prohibit the observed practice of allowing the location of Kiosks and temporary retail stands within the common areas of the Factory Outlet during certain times of the year. The two pre-existing Kiosks shall be shown on the "as -built" plans and are exempted as long as they are included in the calculation of the maximum allowed 121,000 square feet of G.L.A. (c) Applicant has disclosed to this Commission that up to 100 parking spaces located on its property are available for use by adjoining properties during designated times. See Condition #3 in Warranty Deed of Thomas A. Farrell to Garden Way Incorporated, dated June 30, 1981, recorded in Volume 175 at Page 42 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Applicant has provided the Commission information that the use of these parking spaces by adjoining properties will not conflict with the needed use of these spaces by the Factory Outlet facility. Based upon this information, the Planning Commission has determined that these parking spaces are available to meet the increased parking demand created by "r7 Y the proposed addition. If these spaces should cease to be available to the Applicant to meet the parking requirements of this project, the Planning Commission may direct Applicant to take appropriate measures to mitigate this reduction in parking. Such measures may include, but are not limited to, requiring Applicant to hire parking lot attendants to regulate circulation within the parking lot or requiring Applicant to reduce the amount of area under lease within the building. Because this project was approved primarily to obtain the benefit of additional landscaping and improved traffic circulation on site, the measures available for mitigation of this reduction in parking shall not include any reduction in landscaped area or the width of traffic circulation lanes approved in connection with the requested building expansion. (d) Upon expiration of Condition #3 in the above - referenced Warranty Deed from Farrell to Garden Way, Applicant shall not, without the prior approval of the Planning Commission, enter into any agreement or in any way authorize the use of parking spaces within its property for any use other than parking for its own property. The expiration of Condition #3 shall not be deemed or 8 interpreted to create additional parking space available for this project since the parking spaces addressed by Condition #3 have already been included in the required parking for this project. (e) Because of its continuing concern with the adequacy of parking for this site, the Planning Commission will closely monitor parking on the site for three years following the date that the building improvements authorized by this approval are opened to the public. The Planning Commission, with the assistance of the City Planner and the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, shall determine the frequency of parking lot utilization counts. Applicant will be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the taking of required parking lot counts. In addition, upon request by the City Planner, the Applicant shall provide the City Planner verifiable records regarding the amount of space under lease on the dates of the required counts. (f) If, during the life of this project, the Planning Commission determines that unreasonable traffic congestion or unsafe traffic conditions are occurring on this site, it may direct Applicant to impose measures to mitigate such conditions. Such measures may include those set OJ Vo1. 171 Pare 43 S 72028'10"E a distance of 63.37 feet to the left having a radius of 230.15 feet to a point; thence in a curve to 172.99 feet a distance of 93.49 feet a distance of 309.43 feet to the iron place of beginning. to a point; thence in a curve feet a distance of 124.38 the right having a radius of to a point; thence S 72028110" E pin marking the point and Said premises contain 10.10 acres, more or less, and are shown and depicted as "Parcel 2" on a certain map or plan entitled "Plat of Survey for Seaway Shopping Center Corporation and Thomas A. Farrell" prepared by John A. Marsh, dated June 4, 1981 and recorded or to be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records, to which reference is made. Said premises are conveyed subject to and together with the benefit of: I. Taxes due the City of South Burlington, not delinquent, which the Grantee by acceptance of this deed expressly assumes and agrees to pay. 2. Any and all provisions of any municipal ordinance, public law or special act. 3. The right of Grantor, his heirs and assigns, until June 30, 2002, to use a portion of the northwesterly corner of the premises as reasonably required for supplemental parking of automobiles of employees, patrons and invitees of the restaurant and nightclub located immediately northerly of the herein -conveyed premises (now or formerly known as the Old Board and the Yankee Trader Room) as now constituted, and the existing studio and office building located immediately northwesterly thereof (presently occupied by International Television Corporation) as now constituted. The amount of such parking is limited to a maximum of SO spaces during business daytime hours (prior to six o'clock p.m.) and a maximum of 100 spaces during evenings and on weekends and holidays, and is subject to the obligation of Grantor, his successors and assigns to pay a pro rata share of the costs of maintaining, repairing, illuminating, landscaping and removing snow and ice (such share to be based upon the actual use of such supplemental parking by or on behalf of said Grantor). 4. The right of the Grantor, his heirs and assigns, to install, maintain, repair and replace a pipe or pipes to drain surface water from the lands located easterly of The Old Board, so called, and northerly of said private road, and to connect same to the manhole and drainage pipes presently located in the northwesterly quadrant of the herein -described premises, including the right to enter upon the herein -described premises with machinery and equipment for such purposes; such right to be exercised at Grantor's sole cost and 01 expense and in good and workmanlike fashion, and the location of-/�Z�'r the pipes to be as shown and depicted as "Drainage R.O.W." on the -2- I 11 #,A �, Y r-VAc? vr.uw 4z iCa-mar 4t'm+r ecfjoN ,I o �bwnncur Ffvp4a- N U z t�i4 t� U.I far' per- �� I L � a�.emit —}- yz ,oz "� 4 J f1 IN I $ bAtiC2 eU,,, WWa,-- W 2i� tUW.IN i(1 I J � I I 4, U4�lwe/j4N rgprpP( aTi-zT a1 I T Q T/A WtiF� M#j �pf'JKU 1 Lt�i I°7 }'EPUI(i W6 S�pGBc. cf�krv,Y cfs- ry t 1 GNI1TENtx1.l Cr�N� 429 4.f. rNfiJG 046 � q' Df�Mr� Nd � fin riq'/r�11 Y xa ; 3 Iq7 �� Tv(aL "a'O (rXCIubINl, A/6FI at�i 3G1 NOV 3 U 1992 City of So. Burlington f�v C Los -67 7 -7 e . ;re . — 4P6,00z- ~ 4&,e ov 4r�,* -*OUJ7, -19f f /'& le, 4, v 7 /. -C7- e.,e ol4ft-e- -f,'d 7— Z4 012 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 4, 1992 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is an agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, December 8, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. to present your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i cerely, s J e Weith, C ty Planner Encls JW/mcp M November 13, 1992 Joe Weith, City Planner 575 Dorset Street S. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Joe, This letter is to follow up on our conversation today regarding future plans for the opening of O'Dell Parkway. Opening up this road would greatly impact both the safety and the character of this neighborhood.At this point this neighborhoods sees traffic from the following areas: Correctional Center, Twin Oaks, The Olympiad, Joy Drive, both business and residential developments,Rice High School, Vermont Gas, Wright and Morrissey, and the businesses at the end of Farrell Road. If that was opened you would ADD, the Factory Outlet, Ben Franklin,Chittenden Bank. any new development in that area, and Bambinos. I believe this change would then make our traffic situation intolerable. Allowing traffic from a bar to travel through further impacts the safety and integrity of our neighborhood,not to mention what it will do to the value of our property. I recommend the following: 1.Putting traffic counters throughout the neighborhood to determine the current level of traffic. I don't believe there has been a recent traffic count , and that alot has changed since the last one was done. 2. Involve the residents of the neighborhood in the process of how to handle the situation. I think it would be beneficial to form a committee that was made up of residents, and planning commission members to study this situation. I would like to be made aware of any meetings pertaining to this issue. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this issue. Sincerely, d G ' ` w� ' / usan C. Pritchard "' 38 Meadow Road S. Burlington, Vermont Telephone: 6r-�r Work 864-4456 Home / 7S � 6s 3g FARRELI 1 I ti TWFaW✓ r pV1 1 LIEU W, 0( wi�f, Igo 0�' of IMYO m r - ,bl�604XrIN4'1 IN, 'IN- r-w OWL- NOV-09-1992 09:12 FROM GE HSD PPOGPHf9S TO 9 GSS474e P.01 TV: Planning Comission FACM: Recreation Path Committee RE: O'Dell Parkway Bike Path DATE: November 9,1992 The South Burlington Recreation Path Cor=ittea met on Monday November 2,1992 and at that greeting a p:ol l-munary concept for a bike path in the vicinity of the current Chitt.anden Bork office on Shelburne Rd. This project is being referred to as the O'Dell Parkway Bike Path. The rowabors present strongly 9upport_od the incoprporation of a bike path in future development of the area and offer the following guidance which we believe to be consistent with the current concept. 1. The path should connect Farrell St. &nd Shslburne Rd. at the Home Ave intersection.. 2. The path should be on the south side of arr roadway. 3. A six foot wide path, clearly narked, on the side of the road vs. a separated path is acceptable, possibly reccmwnded, in the area of the shopping center to avoid multiple automobile intersections. 4. It is desired that t-Ae path have only two automobile intersections between Farrell St. and Shelburne Rd. It should be noted that the co=d ttoe does not envision this portion or the path as a principally recreatiana:i area but rather an access from the bike path to be constructed in the Farrel St. area to the shopping areas on Shelburne Rd. The pla.ceraent of bicycle racks near appropriate wall entrances should re planntd a6 a part of this project. We look ford for the opportunity to provide additional co=ents as the project moves forward. Post -It'" brand fax tranernittal memo 7971 10,04 pager ► C°• Dept. Z 4 Fax City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 20, 1992 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please submit revised plans and/or additional information in response to these comments by no later than Friday, November 27, 1992. Please call if you have any questions. Sinc rely, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp Preliminary December 8, November 17, Page 4 Memorandum 1992 agenda items 1992 FARRELL - DRIVE-IN BANK - O'DELL PARKWAY --- the 60 foot r.o.w. known as O'Dell Parkway which connects Farrell Street with Shelburne Road should be identified on the plans and dedicated to the City (i.e., irrevocable offer of dedication). The plan should be revised to move parking spaces outside of this future public street. --- building and overall coverage information for the entire site should be submitted. --- the proposed bank building straddles a property line between two (2) lots. These two (2) lots should be merged and a lot - --merger agreement submitted for review by the City Attorney. --- the information requested in the October 26, 1992 memo relating to number of seats in Bambino's and the square footage of office space should be submitted in order to determine minimum parking requirements. --- applicant should address the issue of making a two-way access drive into an egress only access drive on property which is not part of this application. --- is the new loading platform for Ben Franklin part of this application? --- applicant must submit plan showing the overall site and the O'Dell Parkway r_o.w. extending from Shelburne Road to Farrell Street. JOLLEY ASSOCIATES - ACCESSORY BUILDING - REVISED SITE PLAN --- plan submitted does not accurately reflect site conditions i.e., site landscaping is different than shown on the plan, handicapped space is in a different location, site lighting is not exactly as shown and the landscaped island adjacent to Patchen Road is not exactly as shown. --- site plan must be revised to accurately depict site conditions as they currently exist. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: Preliminary Comments December 8, 1992 agenda items Date: November 20, 1992 S.B. COLLINS - MOBIL STATION, WILLISTON ROAD - PATCHEN ROAD Plan for the above referenced gas station dated January 30, 1992 with latest revision dated June 28, 1992 prepared by Schreib Engineering is acceptable. O'DELL PARKWAY, SHELBURNE ROAD 1) Street r.o.w. boundaries should be shown. 2) About 70 of the proposed parking spaces appear to infringe upon the proposed street r.o.w. If in the future the street is widened these spaces will be eliminated or greatly reduced. 3) The new street curb cuts shall have a depressed curb. Sidewalks shall be continuous across the driveways. 4) New street should include sidewalks on both sides. 5) A drainage plan shall be submitted for review and approval. NOWLAND II , SPEAR STREET 1) The existing water main on Spear Street is a 12 inch asbestos cement main not 8 inch as shown on the plans. 2) The Spear Street intersection should include widening for turning lanes. 3) The sidewalk along Deerfield Drive should be constructed one foot from r.o.w. � I �5-uutb ti urlingtun +R t`re Department f 575 Bnrset street Q,autb +Surlingtnn, Vermont 05403 FAX: (802) 658-4748 TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE RE: TUESDAY DECEMBER 8,1992 AGENDA ITEMS DATE: MONDAY NOVEMBER 16,1992 1. O'DELL PARK BANK PCD SITE PLAN PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND DUE TO THE SIZE OF BAMBINO'S, WVNY AND THE BANK AND THE LAY OUT OF THE NEW ROAD WAY AND PARKING 1-HYDRANT IS NEEDED AT A LOCATION BEHIND THE BUILDINGS APPROVED BY THIS OFFICE. 2. S.B. COLLINS GAS STATION WILLISTON RD. & PATCHEN ROAD 3. PLANS WERE REVIEWED ON THE 11'4" X 18' ENCLOSED DUMPSTER SHEAD AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM IN GIVEN EMERGENCY SERVICE. SOUTHEAST SUMMIT PROJECT # 92039 OFF DORSET STREET DATED 10/92 ON 11/16/92 I HAD A MEETING WITH MR STEEL AND THE ONLY PROBLEM I HAD WAS THE LAY OUT OF HYDRANTS WHICH WAS APPROVED BY MR. STEEL TO BE LOCATED AS MARKED ON THE PLAN PROJECT # 92039 DRAWING # D-4409 4. NOWLAND TWO PROJECT # 92045 SPEAR STREET ON 11/16/92 I HAD A MEETING WITH MR. JOHN STEEL BECAUSE THE HYDRANTS WERE NOT LOCATED WHERE WE HAD REQUESTED. THEY HAVE BEEN RELOCATED ON DRAWING # D-4381 & D-4382, AND APPROVED BY MR STEEL. wl- (802) 658-7960 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 6, 1992 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is an agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, November 10, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. to present your request. If you have any questions, Encls JW/mcp please a me a call. S'ncer , oe Weith, City Planner S o l G 7` 1 C ,X . 6� 4"<<- 7-,�� -*io , s,� + aT,;,.d ? a a� O `E L L OL..�.., `������� S J M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files 0A From: Raymond J. Belau, Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments - November 11, 1992 agenda items Date: October 26, 1992 FARRELL - DRIVE-IN BANK - SKETCH PLAN The following information must be shown on the sketch plan: --- name and address of the owner of record and applicant. --- name of owners of record of contiguous properties. --- boundaries of contiguous land belonging to the owner of record. --- boundaries of O'Dell Parkway r.o.w. --- graphic scale --- numerical scale is incorrect, it should be 1"=30'. --- type of, location and approximate size of all utilities (water, sewer, etc,.). --- location map. Other comments: --- provide total number of seats in Bambino's. --- gross square footage in WVNY building and the square footage devoted to general banking services for public use and the square footage devoted to office use for the new bank building should be submitted. --- the Recreation Path Committee will be consulted regarding the proposed bike path. --- applicant's property consists of three (3) lots, either all lots should be shown or a lot merger agreement submitted merging all lots. --- coverage information should be submitted. --- zoning boundary line between Cl and C2 Districts should be shown. --- the 350 foot frontage requirement will be met by adding up the frontages along Shelburne Road, Hadley Road and Farrell Street. This will require that all three (3) lots be part of this PCD now and forever. --- O'Dell Parkway is shown on the City' s Official Map as a future City street, this roadway should therefore be designed to City standards. Staff recommends a 60 foot public r.o.w. from Farrell Street to Shelburne Road be identified and dedicated to the City. Preliminary Comments November 11, 1992 agenda items October 26, 1992 Page 2 --- the plan revised on 10/20/92 shows an additional curb cut on O'Dell Parkway to exclusively serve the drive -through facility. This curb cut is 43 feet in width. Section 19.103b of the zoning regulations limits the width of a commercial curb cut to 36 feet. Staff prefers the original design which provides for fewer curb cuts. --- there should be no parking spaces located within any part of the 60 foot street r.o.w. The following information should be submitted for final plat review: --- proposed and existing landscaping details. --- cost of new bank building. --- existing and proposed exterior lighting details. --- all dumpsters shown and screened. --- traffic study --- drainage plan. EDWARD & JANET AUSTIN - 2 LOT SUBDIVISION - FINAL PLAT --- the r.o.w. from Swift Street to the new r.o.w. should be shown. --- the note regarding the limit of clearing should be clarified. Which side of the line will be cleared and which side will remain wooded? --- plan should show where lot #2 will connect to sewer main. --- more detailed information should be provided as to the exact location of the proposed r.o.w. across lot #1. --- the Public Works Superintendent has recommended that the applicant contribute $15 per linear foot towards the construction of a sidewalk along the south side of Swift Street. K M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: Preliminary Comments November 10, 1992 agenda items Date: October 26, 1992 AUSTIN PROPERTY, SWIFT STREET I. Sewer connection shall be submitted for review and approval. 2. A 20 foot driveway easement would be adequate. It should also be extended to Swift Street. Maintenance of the common drive shall be defined in the easement. O'DELL PARKWAY, SHELBURNE ROAD 1. O'Dell Parkway should be designed as a public street and connected to Farrell Street. This street is on the official map. It was rough graded through years ago and would benefit these businesses. 2. Internal pedestrian traffic between these businesses would justify a sidewalk along both sides of the street. KNIGHT ACURA, SHELBURNE ROAD The northerly parking lot is narrow for parking and driveway. It may be widened by increasing the fill slope to 2:1. The drive on this parking area should include a turnaround. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 27, 1992 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. The plan submitted did not contain all the information required for a sketch plan so therefore your application has been deemed incomplete. You will not be scheduled for review by the Planning Commission until plans are submitted showing the required information for a sketch plan (see first portion of my memo for a list of information required). If you have any questions, please give me a call. Since y, Raymo d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp WIEMANN•LAMPHERE A R C H , ) T E C T S E N G I N E E R S P L A N N E R S I N T E R I O R S October 22, 1992 Mr. Joe Wyeth, Planner City of South Burlington South Burlington Municipal Building 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Joe: Enclosed please find three copies of a revised Site Plan for the above site which should replace those submitted last week by Dennis Webster of this office. A recent meeting with the Owners of the Ben Franklin building, representatives of the Chittenden Bank and some surrounding property owners resulted in minor revisions to the Site Plan as shown on the enclosed. Sincerely, James A. Lamphere JAL/cde encls cc: Tom Farrell Dave Farrell COLCHESTER BUSINESS PARK • 30 SOUTH PARK DRIVE • COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 • 802-655-5020 • FAX 802-655-6567 AyENUL FLYNN P PEA �ON�❑�1-" om-`High Sch< _ AVE. i ] BASE U u •HAO OR. L;4- Wow, ��f7'Y'�Pil ITI w+1 ✓ ��i•%F/ ��y Vui G�S W✓� y= rL is N�ME AVE. D 0 c It SWIFT q FARRELI _ p UE CITY iOq9 LINDENWOODPARK o jy MAPLE 'r Ho. on. ~ Q Yc,�\ J9 AVE. BA AEWEB PKWY. HAWA HI O I ! r/ITIrT�YI�' i'I"I"„wl Ir"Ti✓'✓ 1' ( ,bAT�N/I il�Ltli,�' p �/. ' TANGLEW0001\�\ C\ ET�o Shelburne OUGH�BLA II de + ► i k-..2%1'�y''T PGad�tLGB• (�%'}(}'G(�U�L�e�%P.>7U f� E(�i� IW LAN Ul✓P 9w8' *ew G��� � y!"r 4 zL o Pu�� l�c g,nII �i r" i16 �N I? 1#t�N►► R ON vruor 1w kf rJftw r K ��� -a 'C NOV 0 2 1992 - y City of So. Burlington pp?) too 11 1111 11 1 - 4v ,1 - - + vP' m aG I E is Iti y - K ` t r aL IZ 1, + QtJ te� pxC� r� ¢ I:?Gba p• -. - - G�F,f, r--? e, v_2 k '� *. INN 171 [`^' I M IF• _ � �11,J�'b� i� 'fFF + I I Iy 4� 1 r I �4tJ'(.b{� riJ��It,IGTO1� flAeiw( esu--T ee.+`T i 1) 2) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN Nanc --A -11--- .,,,, a. b. c. Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc. L 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties -�2*wl 0,P4 PP,0*1s Awl �. - W 11 W — 5) Type of existing or propose encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. r�- xl. 1 ✓1 ✓ 1 . . 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. l 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (8 1/2 x 11, 8 1/2 x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the follow- ing information: 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. 2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belong- ing to owner of record and (b) proposed subdivision. 3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. 4) Type of location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets, utilities, and open space. 5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). 6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjac�nt property and surrounding area. -.,-d - ta�o ( ignature) p icant or contact person to- fly149 Date 2 FAX: (802) 658-4748 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: 2. _�§nuttj ��urlington +Rire +Departmrat 575+Burset street outb igurlingtun. Vermont U540 SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF GODDETTE NOVEMBER 10,1992 AGENDA ITEMS MONDAY OCTOBER 26,1992 EDWARD L. JR. 9 JANET A AUSTON PROJECT # 92-290 SWIFT STREET PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH THE 2-LOT SUB -DIVISION. O'DELL PARKWAY BANK AND PARKING LOT CHANGE f. • (802)658-7960 PLAN HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME DUE TO THE CHANGE OF THE PARKING LOT AND ISLAND A HYDRANT IS REQUIRED FOR PROPER PROTECTION TO THE BACK SIDE OF BAMBINO'S AND THE WVNV BUILDING. 3. KNIGHT ACURA AUTO NEW GRAVEL PARKING AREA THE ONLY PROBLEM I SEE AT THIS TIME IS THE GRAVEL ROAD BEHIND THE PARKING AREA IS ONLY 10' AND MUST BE AT LEAST 18' FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT. LJVI:U OCT! 1 1992 044 \J- - &, V� prf� ZP4-rjHoe,6 Ta oU,q r tt v I, 1 E •. �'. I .. . ' S f l y `7r fl I• � "'L ..,...,.....>.,r, _ yam., � . •: r . .^.L.r w,Rjti�i-1.+..��.� ^1r'i. Mw�.r•i.MM+r.I�•�•! r ... �..� rr*�_wJw....r_..,..�... ..+i._+.-,...... r.y.�.. ^' ..�. • 1 r i i' + ` S � L ;'� �+fir �•f 'I'• �•+ ;!{ `•� rt a JJ K(5. Memorandum of Decision and Hearing Notice Land Use Permits #4C 1070 and #4C 1071 Page 1 of 3 STATE of VERMONT Environmental Board District #4 Environmental Commission 1 I 1 West Street, Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 RE: Wright/Morrissey Realty Corp. and Applications #4C1070 and #4C1071 New Enterprises, Inc. Decision and Order and 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250) David M. Farrell and Stewart H. McConaughy, Trustees of the Thomas A. Farrell Trust; David M. Farrell, Trustee of the David M. Farrell Trust; Farrell Corporation; and Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc. DECISION AND ORDER Currently before the District #4 Environmental Commission ("District Commission" or "Commission") is a request for Party status and a motion to continue the hearing presently scheduled for August 6, 2001 by Herman and Mavis Thomas ("the Thomas"'). The August 6 hearing was scheduled to address a notice issue raised in an appeal to the Environmental Board ("Board"), which was later referred to the District Commission upon remand from the Board. This Decision and Order pertains to the Thomas' motion to continue. On June 21, 2001, the Commission issued an order permitting all parties listed on the Certificate of Service, including the Thomas', to submit information relevant to the question of the adequacy of notice to adjoining property owners on or before July 2, 2001. The Thomas' timely filed a statement indicating that they are adjoining landowners to the proposed projects but that they did not receive notice of the projects. The Commission has verified that the Thomas' were not included in the original Certificate of Service. On July 31, 2001 the Thomas' timely filed a request for party status under criteria 1(B), 4, 5, and 9(K). On that same day a motion was filed requesting a continuance of the hearing due to the unavailability of the Thomas' expert witness, who is scheduled to testify at another Act 250 hearing that same night. DECISION and ORDER 1. The Hearing scheduled for August 6, 2001 at 6:00 p.m. at the Essex Junction District Office of the Agency of Natural Resources, 111 West Street, Essex Junction, Vermont is canceled. Memorandum of Decision and Hearing Notice Land Use Permits #4C1070 and #4C1071 Page 2 of 3 2. The Thomas' must submit pre -filed testimony on the requested party status criteria by Friday, August 10, 2001. The Thomas' must ensure that the Applicant and other parties receive a copy of their submission on or before Friday, August 10, 2001. 3. The hearing is rescheduled for Monday, August 20, 2001 at 6:00 p.m. at the Essex Junction District Office of the Agency of Natural Resources, 111 West Street, Essex Junction, Vermont. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this day of August 2001 B , / "� y. �G�` Peter E. Keibel, District #4 Coordinator for Carol L. Shea, Chair District #4 Commission Other Commissioners participating Ralph Montefusco Patricia Tivnan UA4C 1070AMOD CE ICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on this day of August, 2001, a copy of the foregoing MEMORANDUM cancelling scheduled hearing of August 6, 2001/Applications #4C1070 & #4C1071 was sent, first class mail, postage prepaid to: PARTIES: Dan Morrissey Wright/Morrissey Realty Corporation PO Box 421 Burlington, VT 05402-0421 Fred Tiballi New Enterprises, Inc. 120 Pine Street Burlington, VT 05401 New Enterprises, Inc. c/o Derrick Davis/The Davis Company 431 Pine Street Burlington, VT 05401 David M. Farrell & Stewart H. McConaughy Trustees of the Thomas A. Farrell Trust c/o Farrell Corporation 5 Holmes Road South Burlington, VT 05403 David M. Farrell, Trustee of the David M. Farrell Trust c/o Farrell Corporation 5 Holmes Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Farrell Corporation 5 Holmes Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc. 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Eric Farrell Redstone Commercial Group One Main Street Burlington, VT 05401 Peter Doremus, Esq. Doremus, Kantor & Daly PO Box 445 Burlington, VT 05402-0445 Page 2/Certir �e of Service/#4C1070/#4C1071 PARTIES: (Con't) Stephen A. Vock, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 928 Falls Road, PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Amy Wright Lake Champlain Housing Development Corporation 220 Riverside Avenue Burlington, VT 05401 Chair, City Council Chair, Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Michael Crane, Executive Director Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission PO Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Warren Coleman, Esq., Environmental Litigation Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 Tim Barritt 71 Meadows Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Elise Guyette & David Shiman 22 Orchard Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Frank & Jennifer Kochman 75 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 518 Corporation d/b/a Ben Franklin c/o 697 Hercules Drive Suite #2 Colchester, VT 05446 Amy L. Gamble, PE Technical Services/Vermont Agency of Transportation 133 State Street Montpelier, VT 05633 f Page 3/Certificate of Service/#4C1070/#4C1071 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission Carol Shea, Chair/Ralph Montefusco/Patricia Tivnan 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Christopher Owen VT Dept. of Public Service 112 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 Dan Gaherty Efficiency Vermont 255 South Champlain Street Burlington, VT 05401 Greg Rabideau Rabideau Architects 286 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 Michael Kiey, Esq. 26 Pearl St. Essex Jct., VT 05452 FEP II c/o 697 Hercules Drive, Suite #2 Colchester, VT 05446 Herman and Mavis Thomas c/o Gary Franklin Eggleston & Cramer, Ltd. 150 South Champlain Street, PO Box 1489 Burlington, VT 05402-1489 Herman and Mavis Thomas 64 Southwind Drive Burlington, VT 05401 Dated at Essex Junction, Ve w:cs4C107071/eb 879-5660 No Text "- % � w� . °"�� . .�. ~ t ��, 1 No Text 0 No Text I f 1, No Text No Text No Text M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: December 8, 1992 agenda items Date: December 4, 1992 3) FARRELL - DRIVE -IN -BANK - O'DELL PARKWAY - REVISED SKETCH This project consists of the construction of a drive-in bank facility on a lot which includes Bambino's and Ben Franklin. This application is being treated as a Planned Commercial Development because three (3) lots are involved on which three (3) buildings are situated, the new bank building being the 4th building. Allr,r° three (3) lots need to be included to meet the 350 foot frontage >+`r4( requirement. This means that from now on any change involving .z these lots will require an amendment to the PCD. The Planning Commission reviewed a sketch plan of this proposal on November 10, 1992 (minutes enclosed). The revised sketch plan shows a change in parking and circulation between Ben Franklin and the proposed bank building primarily to accommodate stacking room for the car wash. Also, one (1) additional drive -up lane was added to the bank for a total of three (3) teller lanes and a by-pass lane. This project is located in both the Cl and C2 Districts. It is bounded on the west by Shelburne Road, on the south by the Factory Outlet Mall and undeveloped property, on the east by Farrell Street and on the north by Twin Oaks fitness center, seven (7) single family residences on Hadley Road, an apartment building and an auto service station. Access/circulation: Access to the property is via a 40 foot curb cut on Shelburne Road for O'Dell Parkway (a private r.o.w.), Bacon Street (a 50 foot private r.o.w.), two (2) access drives to the Factory Outlet Mall and a 60 foot r.o.w. which is 520 feet long extending from Farrell Street to the project site. ,F. The main access to the site, which the City's tax map shows extends from Shelburne Road to Farrell Street, is a 60 foot r.o.w. known as O'Dell Parkway. The plan submitted does not show this r.o.w. extending to Farrell Street. It stops at the Davis property which,:' means that the City would have to obtain an offer of dedication from them to make the connection with Farrell Street. The plans ;V 1 9�'00 Memorandum December 8, December 4, Page 2 - Planning 1992 agenda items 1992 shows this r.o.w. being only 45 feet wide from Ben Franklin to the Davis property. At sketch plan the Planning Commission wanted to see a 60 foot r.o.w. from Shelburne Road all the way through to Farrell Street. Another option would be to have the applicant dedicate a portion of his land which does extend to Farrell Street for the r.o.w. The plan should be revised to move parking spaces outside of this future public r.o.w. as was requested by the Planning Commission at Sketch Plan. Plan shows the access to the T.J. Maxx loading dock to be closed. Applicant should address how trucks will access the loading dock. Coverage/setbacks: Coverage information requested but not submitted. The proposed bank building will now meet the setback requirements. Landscaping: Landscaping details not submitted. Plan submitted does show street trees along both sides of the main access road. Landscaping details must be submitted for next level of review. Parking: The entire site requires a total of 367 spaces and only 256 spaces are being shown. This is a shortfall of 111 spaces or 30%. The applicant has indicated that there are some shared parking opportunities and should therefore submit a shared parking analysis. The applicant indicates that 50 parking spaces are available on the adjacent Heathcote property by deed agreement. Condition 7(c) of the T.J. Maxx approval (see enclosed) requires that if these 50 spaces are used by Farrell, that Heathcote must mitigate this reduction in available parking, if requested to do so by the Planning Commission, and hire parking lot attendants or reduce the amount of area under lease in the building. This deed agreement would also allow the use of 100 spaces after 6:00 P.M. weekdays and on weekends and holidays (see enclosed). This agreement expires in 9 1/2 years. Condition 7(d) of the T.J. Maxx approval prohibits the applicant from entering into any similar type agreement after the expiration of the current agreement without pri5r approval from the Planning Commission, therefore those 100 spaces will be gone in 9 1/2 years. The plan shows parking spaces located within the O'Dell Parkway r.o.w. There should be no parking spaces located within any part of this r.o.w. 2 Memorandum December 8, December 4, Page 3 - Planning 1992 agenda items 1992 Bikepath: The Recreation Path Committee reviewed the last sketch plan (see enclosed memo). The applicant is proposing a six (6) foot wide bike path located within the 30 foot paved roadway along the southerly side of the road. A painted line will be used to separate the bike path from the traveled way. Preliminary plat review: The following information should be submitted for preliminary plat review: --- proposed and existing landscaping details --- coverage information --- property survey of entire site --- show property lines for Ben Franklin lot. --- cost of new bank building --- existing and proposed exterior lighting details --- the loading dock change for Ben Franklin should be requested by them and treated as an amendment to their plat, or should be included as part of this application. If the latter, then Ben Franklin needs to be a coapplicant. 4) SOUTHEAST SUMMIT/NOWLAND II 369 UNIT PRD - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of a planned residential development consisting of 369 dwelling units on two (2) parcels of land. The Southeast Summit parcel will consist of 237 units (80 multi -family units and 157 single family lots) and the Nowland II parcel will consist of 132 units (92 single family lots and 40 multi -family elderly units). The Planning Commission reviewed a sketch plan for both these parcels on 6/16/92 (minutes enclosed). At that meeting these two (2) parcels were treated as separate projects. These projects have now been combined into one (1) project due to the transfer of 40 units from the Southeast Summit parcel to the Nowland II parcel under Section 26.604 of the zoning regulations. 3 Preliminary Memorandum - Planning April 28, 1998 agenda items April 3, 1998 Page 2 — sheet 20 should include land survey's stamp instead of engineer's stamp. EDWARD WOUSTEIN - OUTDOOR TERRACE - SKETCH PLAN r, — provide estimated cost of this project. Additional landscaping is required based on the formula in Section 26.105(a) of the zoning regulations. — a bike rack should be provided as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. — indicate existing seating approved. — provide details (cut -sheets) for all proposed and existing exterior lighting and show locations. — the final plat plan should show the entire property and include coverage information. — the pole mounted flood lights and the building mounted flood lights should either be removed or replaced with downcasting shielded fixtures approved by the City Planner. — the plan should show a screened dumpster storage area. — the parking lot should be striped. 2 Memorandum - City Engineer April 28, 1998 agenda items April 3, 1998 Page 2 CHEERS - SHELBURNE ROAD Architect did a good illustration of the proposed terrace and the plan is acceptable. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: April 28 , 1998 agenda items Date: April 1, 1998 1) Nile Duppstadt Van Sicklen Road Dated 3/17/98 1. The only drawback as far as Fire Protection goes is the lack of fire hydrants to Lots 1-8. The rest of the lots have been addressed. We would recommend that the new buildings of these lots be equipped with Residential Sprinkler systems to ensure proper fire protection. 2. We are concerned that the emergency access road be maintained so that it is available when needed. 2) Ed Wolfstein Dated 3/23/98 520 Shelburne Road If the patio is ever enclosed, the building will be required to be sprinklered. 3) John Larkin Dated 3/24/98 1 Dorset Street Acceptable 4) Amy Sylvester Averill Dated 3/11/98 1985 Spear Street Acceptable 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of recordk-_:_L� LL_ �71�r�2tP�IYCc�tG, . }�V4r& gigarD �UfZLiN��,�or.l . b . Applicant1t��'�� l�!!� LF��-1►•� , �(,A Flo I, Aft ---osze— 41;&4 13 --5-54--, c . Contact D-fDr 0 4- Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). 0116 - _ Applicant's legal interest in the option, etc. --i'O L-- n : ow property (fee simple, Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties c,A -a ,PLA%4 o I L co • hoc- • ) A A tK . ES / W . W o A g . Swi _61. A W • G�GGS . L.A L . S'izocK4 8 . SAKN�`f �� .4�c ►+ot.I I M . S7L1K MAct{ -r A P. F4AsK Ius� . ?. src % s / g .,4 M .eaO r-IFL-D, 1A0CAA r'►-A44 L-I,.l T-roja IN Doom -ram .0 t vs rpl� +fz M INC 71 141 �41r scrID4�S PIIIU f�1 1IL£� � lw'�`i, �aFGl�tAs, r'11LY -rp - ""S &--t Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. 1 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affects the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: fic - 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (81 x 11, 81 x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the following information: a) Name and address of the owner of record and applicant. b) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. c) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). d) Boundaries and area of: 1) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record, and 2) proposed subdivision. e) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. f) Type of, location, and size of existing and proposed streets, structures, utilities, and open space. g) Existing zoning boundaries. h) Existing water courses, wetlands, floodplains, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features. i) Location of existing septic systems and wells. j) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. k) All applicable information required for a site plan, as provided in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a commercial or industrial complex, multi -family project, planned unit development, or planned residential development, / (Signature) plicant or contact person AI AOW Date Wolfstein A R C H 1 T E C T U R E 100 Church Street, Burlington, Vermont 05401.4408 USA TRANSMITTAL LETTER Date: Monday, March 23, 1998 To: South Burlington Zoning � Planning Attention: Raymond Belair Re: Cheers Outdoor Terrace Architect's Project Number: 9815 We Transmit: Quantity Revision Revision Date Description 5 - 3/23/98 SK-1 - Terrace Design Studies for Cheers Bar � Restaurant, 520 -Shelburne Road Scale: Various 24" x 36" 1 - 3/23/08 SK-1 - Terrace Design Studies for Cheers Bar � Restaurant, 520 Shelburne Road REDUCED SCALE to 11" x 17' By: ell G Telephone 802.864.8334 • Facsimile 802.864.8342 - Toll -Free 1.800.487.9346 • E-mail ewolfste@together.net http://www.together.net/—ewolfste/wa.httn CITY CLEWS OFFICE i Rec( NJ;.._— 99&a M Recorded in Vol. 361 on page - Of So. Burlington Land Recor SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISIO C. Margaret A. Picard, City Clerk RE: O'DELL PARK, A PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT DAVID M. FARRELL AND STUART McCONAUGHEY, TRUSTEES, THOMAS A. FARRELL, DONOR; FARRELL CORPORATION; AND DAVID M. FARRELL, APPLICANTS RESOLUTION Upon motion made, seconded and unanimously passed, it was RESOLVED, that the approval of the South Burlington Planning Commission of certain properties of David M. Farrell and Stuart McConaughy, Trustees, Thomas A. Farrell, Donor; Farrell Corporation and David M. Farrell as a Planned Commercial development ("PCD") which was initially approved by South Burlington Planning Commission on June 29, 1993, the plat thereof being recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records on , 1993 in Plat Volume at Page is hereby RATIFIED and VALIDATED in all respects, subject to all requirements and conditions of the resolution and approval of the South Burlington Planning Commission dated June 29, 1993. The sole and exclusive purpose of the within resolution is to establish compliance with the provisions of 24 V.S.A. 4416. Dated this 5P/L ` day of October, 1993. SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: November 10, 1992 agenda items Date: November 6, 1992 1) OTHER BUSINESS I would like to discuss the Commission's agenda for the month of December. At this point I am proposing the following: 12/1/92 Worksession 12/8/92 Development Review 12/15/92 Worksession 12/22/92 No meeting 12/29/92 No meeting (or development review if necessary) We need to have two worksessions to continue working on the update of the zoning and subdivision regulations. We are falling far behind. We were supposed to be done by November 1 according to the grant agreement. I do not want to lose the remaining $2000 still coming to us or more importantly potentially complicate the $15,000 grant recently awarded to us for developing impact fees. I am proposing only one development review during the month. I have scheduled no meeting for the 22nd and 29th because of the holidays. Would the Commission instead rather meet on the 29th? 3) FARRELL - DRIVE-IN BANK - O'DELL PARKWAY - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of the construction of a drive-in bank facility on a lot which includes Bambino's and Ben Franklin. This application is being treated as a Planned Commercial Development because three (3) lots are involved on which three (3) buildings Memorandum - November 10, November 6, Page 2 Planning 1992 agenda items 1992 are situated, the new bank building being the 4th building. All 'J three (3) lots need to be included to meet the 350 foot frontage P&P requirement. This means that from now on any change involving these lots will require an amendment to the PCD. This project is located in both the Cl and C2 Districts. It is bounded on the west by Shelburne Road, on the south by the Factory Outlet Mall and undeveloped property, on the east by Farrell Street and on the north by Twin Oaks fitness center, seven (7) single family residences on Hadley Road, an apartment building and an auto service station. Access/circulation: Access to the property is via a 40 foot curb cut on Shelburne Road for O'Dell Parkway (a private r.o.w.), Bacon Street (a 50 foot private r.o.w.), two (2) access drives to the Factory Outlet Mall and a 60 foot r.o.w. which is 520 feet long extending from Farrell Street to the project site. The main access to the site which connects Farrell Street to Shelburne Road is a 60 foot r.o.w. known as O'Dell Parkway. This r.o.w. is shown on the Official Map as a future City street and should therefore be designed to City standards. Staff recommends that a 60 foot public r.o.w. from Farrell Street to Shelburne Road be identified and dedicated to the City (i.e., irrevocable offer of --i dedication). The plan should be revised to move parking spaces outside of this future public r.o.w. The bank facility is shown as having two (2) curb cuts on the main access road. A 24 foot curb cut and a 44 foot curb cut. Section 19.103b of the zoning regulations limits the width of a commercial curb cut to 36 feet. A previously submitted sketch plan showed L✓/ )G only one (1) curb cut for the bank. Staff prefers the original b design which provides for fewer curb cuts and more stacking room vlf for the drive -through facility. Circulation would be greatly improved by continuing O'Dell Parkway to Farrell Street. Applicant shows this access ending at Bambino's. Coverage/setbacks: Coverage information submitted. 2 requested but not Memorandum - November 10, November 6, Page 3 Planning 1992 agenda items 1992 Bank building will not meet setback requirement from boundary line separating the Farrell Corporation lot from the Thomas Farrell lot. The building is proposed to be five (5) feet from this boundary. The Planning Commission could modify the setback requirements under Section 11.507b. Landscaping: Landscaping details not submitted. Plan submitted does show street trees along both sides of the main access road. Landscaping details must be submitted for next level of review. Parking: The minimum parking requirements for the entire site can not be determined. Information necessary to make this determination was requested but not submitted. �o5/' G's The applicant indicates that 50 parking spaces are available on the adjacent Heathcote property by deed agreement. Condition 7(c) of �S�(� the T.J. Maxx approval (see enclosed) requires that if these 50 ' a spaces are used by Farrell, that Heathcote must mitigate this reduction in available parking, i.e. hire parking lot attendants or reduce the amount of area under lease in the building. The plan shows parking spaces located within the O'Dell Parkway r.o.w. There should be no parking spaces located within any part of this r.o.w. Bikepath: The Recreation Path Committee has reviewed this sketch,`/� plan and will be submitting comments. The applicant is proposing,(, P. a six ( 6 ) foot wide bike path located within the 30 foot paved roadway along the southerly side of the road. A painted line will be used to separate the bike path from the traveled way. Preliminary plat review: The following information should be submitted for preliminary plat review: --- proposed and existing landscaping details --- coverage information --- total number of seats in Bambino's --- gross square footage in WVNY building and the square footage devoted to general banking services for public use and the square footage devoted to office use for the new bank building. --- property survey of entire site --- show property lines for Ben Franklin lot. --- cost of new bank building --- existing and proposed exterior lighting details - R k, P,-C3 Memorandum - Planning November 10, 1992 agenda items November 6, 1992 Page 4 --- all dumpsters shown and screened --- traffic study --- drainage plan --- explain purpose Farrell. of 60 foot strip of land owned by David (�9 4) CHITTENDEN BANK, FACTORY OUTLET MALL Enclosed is a request from Chittenden Bank requesting a six month extension for the continued use of their drive -through banking service. It is their opinion that the recent submittal by Farrell for the development of a new bank on his property and proposed improvements to O'Dell Parking constitutes a substantial change in circumstance and therefore justifies reconsideration of the original condition. At this point, City Attorney Steve Stitzel advises that the Commission go through the same process as they did last month when Heathcote proposed modifying the bank building and circulation pattern. The Commission should decide first whether or not to reconsider the application. To reconsider, the Commission must find a substantial change in circumstance. If the Commission finds a substantial change in circumstance, then a revised final plat hearing to amend the condition to allow a six month extension will need to be warned. Steve Stitzel is concerned with this request as it has been made by Chittenden Bank and not by Heathcote Associates. In addition, the Commission's recent denial to reconsider Heathcote's request to amend the condition has been appealed to Superior Court. I hope to have a letter from Steve Stitzel advising the Commission on how to proceed at Tuesday's meeting. 5) DICK NIGHT - AUTO SALES LOT - SITE PLAN This project consists of a constructing an auto sales lot on a vacant lot adjoining the applicant's auto dealership. The applicant is scheduled to meet with the Zoning Board of Adjustment on November 9, 1992 requesting a conditional use permit. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION 10 NOVEMBER 1992 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 10 November 1992 at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: William Burgess, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, Catherine Peacock, William Craig, David Austin, Terry Sheahan Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; James Lamphere, Thomas Heilman, Peter Collins, Louis Lamoureaux, Jim Carroll, Christopher Bishop, Gordon Woods, Tim Purcell, Michael Dugan 1. Other Business: Mr. Weith asked the Commission whether they felt as the City Council did that a panel of "advisors" should be put in place for the design review process. Members felt that since this is what the Council seemed to want, it should be done. 2. Review Minutes of 28 July and 11 August 1992: Ms. Peacock moved the Minutes of 28 July be approved as written. Mr. Craig seconded. Motion passed 4-0-with Messrs. Austin and Sheahan abstaining. Mrs. Maher moved the Minutes of 11 August be approved as written. Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Sketch plan application of Thomas Farrell for construction of a new bank building with drive-thru service within a planned commercial development which currently contains a car wash, office building, restaurant/bar building, and leased parking for the adjoining Ben Franklin business, Shelburne Road: Mr. Lamphere reviewed the history of the property. It was bought by Mr. Farrell in 1942 and was last developed by him for the ex- pansion of the Old Board in 1967. Mr. Farrell owns eveathing except for a 65 foot strip of land which is owned by David Farrell. The intent is to put all pieces together for one PCD. They would develop a 40 foot right of way to the back with a 30 foot road back to Bambino's. There would be a branch bank between Bambino's and Ben Franklin's. They want O'Dell Parkway to be a private street. They propose that the curb cut now existing near the present Chittenden Bank would be for egress only. Mr. Weith noted the plan proposgs to close the access by which trucks now back up to TJ Maxx. Mr. Lamphere continued by saying they would get a double row of PLANNING COMMISSION 10 November 1992 page 2 _ parking in front of Ben Franklin. He indicated the parking spaces required to serve Ben Franklin. There would be parking to the east of Bambino's to serve them. The parking plan is 70 spaces short. There is land available for this parking but they don't feel it is needed at this time. If O'Dell were to become a public street, there would have to be more setbacks and 40 parking spaces would have to be moved to behind Bambino's. The development would use municipal water and sewer. The sewer system goes to Burlington as does the storm sewer in front. In the rear, it would go over an easement on the Davis-Tibali land. There is no plan to continue O'Dell to access onto Farrell St. The bike path would, however, continue to Farrell St. A traffic study has been done, and Mr. Openlander will present it at the next review. They estimate that only 13 peak hour cars would be added which would not change the level of service at the intersection. Mrs. Maher asked whether the bank would move or keep both buildings. Mr. Lamphere said they would move their whole oper- ation. Mr. Craig said he was concerned with approving this piecemeal and then having the applicant coming back for more in a few years. He felt he needed to know about the access to the rear and also raised the question of Bacon St. He felt that stacking for the carwash would cause problems on this lot. Mr. Heilman noted the lease with Seaway is not in effect and they remain there on a month -to -month basis. Mr. Craig said if that building remains now, it will cause a problem. Mr. Heilman said all owners will enter into a common maintenance agreement for O'Dell Parkway. He felt this would address the concerns after the carwash goes. Mr. Lamphere said they would take parking out of the triangular space in front and turn it into green space like a park. Mr. Weith questioned the egress -only at the front of the Chit- tenden's present building. Mr. Lamphere said they are trying to get people to park in the back. Mr. Craig noted the City Engin- eer feels stacking for 5 cars is not enough. Mr. Craig asked what right the Davis people have to use O'Dell. Mr. Heilmann said they have access via a private deed which is not affected by this plan. Members then considered the private/public road issue. Ms. i MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: Joe Weith, City Planner RE: Farrell, MBL and Milot/Larkin applications DATE: December 15, 1992 I met with City Attorney, Steve Stitzel, to discuss several questions raised by the Commission in regards to the Farrell (Chittenden Bank), MBL (Ramsey Farm), and Milot/Larkin (Nowland parcel) applications. Steve offers the following advice: Farrell: A question was raised regarding whether the Commission can require dedication of a 60 foot r.o.w. connecting Shelburne Street to Farrell Drive even though the r.o.w. would not be opened at this time with the construction of a City street. It is Steve's opinion that the Commission can require such dedication. The street is shown on the official map and subdivisions are required to comply with all bylaws of the City. In regards to interests which other parties (i.e., Heathcote, Davis, etc.) have in the so called Odell Parkway r.o.w., Steve does not anticipate any complications with a dedication since the City's plans for a public street would be consistent with the parties' current interests. As long as the rights of the parties to use Odell Parkway are not interfered with, there should not be a problem with dedication. However, the City should make sure that legal documents allow parties to continue use of this r.o.w. until such time as the r.o.w. is actually taken over by the City. Co -applicants - Steve has recommended that Ben Franklin be a co - applicant in this project since Farrell is proposing to amend a previously approved site plan for Ben Franklin. Similarly, Steve feels that Heathcote Associates should be a co -applicant since access and circulation changes are being proposed on the Heathcote property. This project should also include the submittal of a revised Heathcote site plan/subdivision plat showing these changes. This revised plan would have to be approved by the Commission and recorded in the land records. Southeast Summit and Nowland Property II: A couple of questions were raised in regards to interpreting the City's new SEQ zoning amendments. The first question related to what criteria the Commission should use in deciding whether or not to grant a 25% density bonus for a PRD. It is Steve's opinion that the additional 25% is not really a bonus but is in effect a higher maximum density which is allowed for a PRD, as opposed to a standard subdivision. Therefore, if an applicant is proposing a development at the max 1.375 units per acre density (1.1 u/a x 1.25 = 1.375 u/a) and can show that the development satisfactorily meets all the PRD criteria and criteria of the SEQ district, then the applicant is entitled to the max density. If the applicant can not demonstrate compliance with the criteria, then the application should be denied. It is important to keep in mind that an applicant is not entitled to the max 1.375 u/a density or even the base density of 1.1 u/a. The applicant is entitled to only whatever density satisfies the criteria, not to exceed 1.375 u/a. A similar question was raised as to the criteria which the Commission should use when deciding whether or not to approve a transfer of density. Steve's opinion is the same. The transfer of density can only be done as a PRD and under one application. Therefore, as long as the applicant can demonstrate that whatever he/she is proposing (not to exceed 1.375 u/a) successfully satisfies the PRD and SEQ criteria, then the applicant is entitled to an approval. Steve suggested that Section 26.604(b) be revised to make this more clear as follows, "...calculated for one parcel in the PRD pursuant to Sections 26.401 and 26.603 above to another parcel in the PRD. Any such .." Another question was raised in regards to water and sewer hook-up requirements. Steve says existing homes along the proposed route for the water and sewer line extensions are not required to hook-up to the new lines. However, Steve says that if the City or applicant want to oversize the facilities to accommodate future development or hook-ons, the City needs to adopt an impact fee in order to collect fees to reimburse the developer or City for the extra cost of the oversized lines. M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files From: Raymond J. Belai , Zoning and Planning Assistant Q Re: Preliminary Comments - April 13, 1993 agenda items Date: March 17, 1993 DAVID FARRELL - DRIVE -IN -BANK - PCD PRELIMINARY PLAT --- there does not appear to be adequate space to stack six (6) vehicles for each drive -up lane as required in Table I of the zoning regulations. --- show vacuum cleaner island for car wash. --- there is a shortfall of 107 parking spaces or 30%, applicant has previously indicated that there are some opportunities for shared parking and should therefore submit a shared parking analysis. --- the applicant indicates that 50 parking spaces are available on the adjacent Heathcote property deed agreement. Condition 7(c) of the T.J. Maxx approval requires that if these 50 spaces are used by Farrell, that Heathcote must mitigate this reduction in available parking, if requested to do so by the Planning Commission, and hire parking lot attendants or reduce the amount of area under lease in the building. This deed agreement would also allow the use of 100 spaces after 6:00 P.M. weekdays and on weekends and holidays. Condition (d) of the T.J. Maxx approval does not allow Heathcote to enter into any agreement to use parking spaces on its property after the expiration of the current agreement with Farrell without approval from the Planning Commission. Therefore, the applicant needs to show that the 107 space shortfall can be met on -site or a shared parking analysis submitted which indicates that fewer spaces are justified. --- plan should show the bike path. --- provide exterior lighting details for all existing and proposed buildings. --- indicate type of screening proposed around dumpsters. --- indicate number of employees in new bank building. --- abutter to the west of car wash is "Reyes" not "Reyers". --- the symbol used for lease lines should be different then that used for property lines on sheets C-1, C-2 and C-3. --- the proposed bank building does not meet the front setback requirement from the O'Dell Parkway r.o.w. The Planning Commission can modify setback requirements under Section 11.507b of the zoning regulations. Preliminary Comments - Planning April 13, 1993 agenda items March 17, 1993 Page 2 --- applicant should note letter to James Lamphere dated@3/5/93 and submit the items requested by 3/24/93. --- the requirement that a 15 foot green strip be maintained between the street and the balance of the lot and that front yard coverage not exceed 30% is not being met for the area from Shelburne Road to Bambinos resulting in a nonconforming situation which is not being made worse by this application and is therefore acceptable. However, that portion of the development east of Bambinos must meet these requirements. SKIP VALEE - SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING - SPEAR STREET --- plan should note the correct zoning district. --- applicant should address in writing the criteria contained in Section 26.606. EUGENE & DAN MORRISSEY- OFFICE BUILDING - SITE PLAN --- exterior lighting details should be submitted. --- a conditional use permit from the Zoning Board of Adjustment should be obtained prior to review by the Planning Commission. --- this property is in Traffic Overlay Zone 5 which will allow this property to generate 50 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. ITE estimates this building used for general offices to generate 52.5 vte's. --- provide quantity of American Arborvitae to be planted, staff calculates that 81 cedar trees would have to be planted to meet the $15,500 landscaping requirement. --- 72 parking spaces are required and only 71 spaces are being provided. --- indicate type of screening for dumpster. --- provide front yard coverage calculation. --- compact car spaces are not permitted, all spaces except for handicapped spaces must be 9'xl8'. --- building elevations should be submitted. --- an "irrevocable offer of dedication" for the sidewalk should be submitted for review by City Attorney. e PLANNING COMMISSION 8 DECEMBER 1992 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 8 December 1992 at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: William Burgess, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, Mac Teeseon Catherine Peacock, David Austin, Terry Sheahan Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Charles Hafter, City Manager; John Dinklage, Bill Cimonetti, City Council; Alex Blair, Tom Hilmann, Jim Lamphere, Dennis Webster, Chris Bishop, Frank Kochman, Holly Reed, Paul Andrew, Bruce Cote, Fred Tiballi, A. E. Boyd, Len Lamoureux, Peter Collin, Al & Rita Reyes, John Larkin, Gerry Milot, Lance Llewellyn, Gary farrell, John Steele, Charles Scott , Vince Bolduc, Littleton Long, Al Bartlett 1. Other Business: No issues were raised. 2. Minutes of 27 October and 10 November 1992: Mrs. Maher moved the minutes of 27 October be approved as written. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mrs. Maher moved to approve the Minutes of 10 November as written. Mr. Austin seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Mr. Teeson abstaining. 3. Sketch plan application of Thomas Farrell for a planned com- mercial development consisting of a new bank building with drive - through service, existing car wash, existing office building, existing restaurant/bar building and leased parking for the adjoining Ben Franklin business, Shelburne Rd: Mr. Lamphere noted there were three property owners involved: Thomas Farrell, Farrell Corporation and David Farrell. He then reviewed the plan: there would be three lanes for the bank, one for the ATM and two drive -up. There was a question raised about parking behind the drive -up, and this has been changed so there is now stacking for 12 cars at the carwash. Mr. Lamphere said the carwash owner says he rarely has more than 6 or 8 cars stacked. If there is a problem, an area is provided for alternate stacking. Mr. Kochman, an adjacent land owner, asked what is to be the fate of the fence required by the City Council in the Bambino's situa- tion. Mr. Lamphere noted the fence now kstends from WVNY. It is rx K' PLANNING COMMISSION 8 DECEMBER 1992 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 8 December 1992 at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: William Burgess, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, Mac Teeseon Catherine Peacock, David Austin, Terry Sheahan Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Charles Hafter, City Manager; John Dinklage, Bill Cimonetti, City Council; Alex Blair, Tom Hilmann, Jim Lamphere, Dennis Webster, Chris Bishop, Frank Kochman, Holly Reed, Paul Andrew, Bruce Cote, Fred Tiballi, A. E. Boyd, Len Lamoureux, Peter Collin, Al & Rita Reyes, John Larkin, Gerry Milot, Lance Llewellyn, Gary farrell, John Steele, Charles Scott , Vince Bolduc, Littleton Long, Al Bartlett 1. Other Business: No issues were raised. 2. Minutes of 27 October and 10 November 1992: Mrs. Maher moved the minutes of 27 October be approved as written. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mrs. Maher moved to approve the Minutes of 10 November as written. Mr. Austin seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Mr. Teeson abstaining. 3. Sketch plan application of Thomas Farrell for a planned com- mercial development consisting of a new bank building with drive - through service, existing car wash, existing office building, existing restaurant/bar building and leased parking for the adjoining Ben Franklin business, Shelburne Rd: Mr. Lamphere noted there were three property owners involved: Thomas Farrell, Farrell Corporation and David Farrell. He then reviewed the plan: there would be three lanes for the bank, one for the ATM and two drive -up. There was a question raised about parking behind the drive -up, and this has been changed so there is now stacking for 12 cars at the carwash. Mr. Lamphere said the carwash owner says he rarely has more than 6 or 8 cars stacked. If there is a problem, an area is provided for alternate stacking. Mr. Kochman, an adjacent land owner, asked what is to be the fate of the fence required by the City Council in the Bambino's situa- tion. Mr. Lamphere noted the fence now kstends from WVNY. It is rx K' PLANNING COMMISSION 8 December 1992 page 2 intended, to move it back. It will extend 50 ft. into the field. This is the field where Mr. Farrell levelled the trees some time ago. Mr. Kochman felt the area in that spot i�, so wet that no development should take place there. He showed pictures of the land to illustrate the wetness. He said he had spoken with the Corps of Engineers who said this is part of the headwall of Potash Brook. Mr. Kochman felt that field has a bearing on the drainage for their homes. He noted that subdivision regulations say an extraordinary reason is needed to develop a poorly drained piece of land and added that the Commission has the right to require additional plantings. He noted that at the present time there is lighting from this property that gets into his home (mostly from headlights of cars) and the Commission has the responsibility to ensure this does not happen. He noted the fence the Council required was supposed to be 8 feet but it is only 7.5 feet high. Mr. Burgess asked the City Planner to get someone to visit the site to look into the issues Mr. Kochman has raised. Mr. Lamphere then explained the plans for O'Dell Parkway. He said the road would be 40 ft. wide from the entrance to the present bank building, then 30 ft. wide to serve the bank, Bam- bino's and WVNY. He suggested the right of way be 60 feet from the entrance to the present bank then 45 ft. the rest of the way. If the right of way is 60 ft. all the way, it would take up one row of required parking for Ben Franklin. They propose the road would remain private but would be turned over to the city in 5 or 10 years if the city wants it. The applicant proposes to turn the triangular piece of land at the entrance into a green area. Regarding connection to Farrell Road, Mr Lamphere noted that Mr. Farrell feels other landowners should contribute to this. Mr. Farrell believes he is giving the major portion and won't give any more. Regarding traffic, Mr. Openlander (who did the traffic study) could not be present at this meeting. Mr. Lamphere summarized the findings. The operation of the bank wouldn't affect the level of service at the intersection. This would be true even if 1000 of the cars go through the intersection instead of entering through the Heathcote property. Regarding cars now parking behind TJ Maxx (as part of an agree- ment that expires in 2002), the applicant feels he has adequate space east of Bambino's for the 100 cars involved in this arrangement. Ms. Peacock said she wasn't sure it would do any good for the city to get an offer of dedication for only part of the road. Mr. Burgess said there was no guarantee the city would get it in PLANNING COMMISSION 8 December 1992 page 3 the future or get it now.. Mr. Sheahan said he has a problem with a 45 foot right of way. Mr. Lamphere said the Ben Franklin parking could be moved elsewhere on the site but they felt it is needed where it is now. Mr. Weith outlined staff concerns: Staff recommends the right of way be dedicated all the way through. If only part of the right of way is needed by the applicant, an adequate turn -around will be needed and the plan doesn't show one. The Street Superintendent wants a minimum 60 foot right of way with no parking on the road. Staff felt that if the spaces along Ben Franklin are lost, people won't walk from the Bambino's area, they would park illegally. Mrs. Maher agreed that the right of way should be to Farrell Rd. Mr. Sheahan agreed. He felt Mr. Farrell should work out an agreement with his neighbors. Mr. Lamphere said they had tried this but it hadn't worked. Mr. Collins, representing Heathcote, said there is already an established 60 foot right of way in the land deeded from Shelburne Rd. to Farrell Rd. and all of it is on the Farrell property. There are easements for property owners to use it all the way through. Mr. Lamoureux said the existing right of way is for ingress and egress and the Factory Outlet has the right to use it. There is also an existing right of way which the appli- cant is showing as green space and where they are also showing parking. Mr. Heilmann said they are trying to separate private rights of way and requirements of the Planning Commission. He said there would be a problem if they dedicated land to the city and then other owners came in with a development plan and wanted to change the land that had been dedicated. Ms. Peacock said she would have no problem changing the dedicated land to fall partly on the Davis land at the time Davis came in for a development plan. Mrs. Maher felt there should be a site visit. Mr. Austin said the Commission could suggest a plan that shows parking in the triangular area but that it not be built until needed. A poll of members showed that a majority favored a 60 foot right of way. Members agreed to a site visit to be scheduled at a convenient time for members and applicants. 0 t . ', J PLANNING COMMISSION 8 December 1992 page 4 Mr. Dinklage noted the official city map shows a public street all the way through and asked the Planning Commission not to do anything that would impede achieving that. Other issues were then addressed. Regarding landscaping, Mr. Lamphere said they will have a final landscaping plan soon. Re- garding parking, Mr. Lamphere said there is more than adequate space for parking. Mr. Weith said the standard requires 367 spaces and the applicant proposes 257 plus the 100 via the agree- ment with Heathcote which expires in 9 years. Mr. Weith said he would like to see a shared parking study, and the applicant agreed to provide this. Regarding the bike path, Mr. Lamphere showed the continuation of the rec path through to Farrell Rd. Mrs. Maher asked why the City Engineer wants a sidewalk on both sides. Mr. Weith said it is a commercial street with people walking back and forth between uses. Mr. Lamphere said they could provide it but didn't feel it was practical or safe to have people crossing the road at many places. Mr. Lamphere said they will provide final details of lighting. Regarding the loading dock, Mr. Lamphere said this location would allow trucks to back up to the dock and move with comforn in and out. Mr. Burgess noted the City Engineer said that 70 parking spaces infringe on the right of way. Mr. Weith will check on this with the City Engineer. Members emphasized that they will ask for sufficient landscaping and screening for neighbors in the residential area. Mr. Weith noted the applicant is changing the access for the Heathcote property. This will require a new site plan for Heathcote and Heathcote may have to be a co -applicant. Mr. Weith said he would discuss this with the City Attorney. Mr. Burgess said he would not want to change the Heathcote approval "by accident," and other members agreed. Mr. Lamoureux said they object strongly to the one-way access for Heathcote at the present bank building. They also object to what they feel will be congestion on the Heathcote property because of this proposed development. They feel the bike path is very un- safe in the proposed location. Mr. Burgess stressed that at the moment -- the existing Heathcote approval is what the Planning Commission wants. He asked Mr. MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: Joe Weith, City Planner RE: Farrell - Chittenden Bank, Traffic Impact Analysis DATE: April 13, 1993 The traffic impact analysis for the above referenced project was submitted to this office on April 12, 1993. I have only briefly reviewed the analysis. My initial concerns at this point are summarized below: 1. Table 3 indicates that with the project the Odell Parkway intersection will operate at an overall LOS of "C" during the 1993 DHV and overall LOS "D" during the 1998 DHV. However, a critical movement (Shelburne Road south approach) will decline from a "D" to "E" during 1998. It is typically City policy that critical movements should not fall below LOS "D". 2. I am concerned with the que lengths for the north approach left turn, south approach through - right and left turns. There does not appear to be sufficient storage to accommodate these ques. 3. The current southbound left turn has a protected phase that is very short, perhaps only 2 or 3 seconds. I assume this analysis incorporates different signal timings than currently exist. What impact will changing the signal timings have on the Factory Outlet Mall intersection? 4. I am concerned with the location of the westernmost curb cut serving Ben Franklin. It is located only 25 feet from the Shelburne Road intersection. (farrell) Memorandum - Planning April 13, 1993 agenda items April 9, 1993 Page 3 5) SKIP VALLEE - SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING - SPEAR STREET This application is to construct a single family dwelling on a 28 acre lot with 10.9 acres located in South Burlington and 17.1 acres in Shelburne. The portion of the lot which is located in South Burlington lies entirely within the restricted area in the Southeast Quadrant District. It is bounded on the north and east by undeveloped property owned by Calkins and on the south and west by the remaining portion of the lot located in Shelburne owned by the applicant. Access: Access will be via a r.o.w. from Spear Street and a 2600 foot long driveway. The access and the driveway are located in Shelburne. Restricted area: The entire portion of the applicant's property in South Burlington is in a restricted area within the Southeast Quadrant District. Section 26.501G. of the zoning regulations allows the Planning Commission to approve construction of a single family residence in the restricted area on a lot in existence on the date this pl -'sion becomes effective if such lot is located entirely or substantially within the restricted area. In making its determination the Planning Commission must take into cons*,, ation the standards setforth in Section 26.606 of the zoning regulations. The applicant's response to these standards are enclosed. Staff recommends approval of the request. The house will be located as far as possible from Spear Street, it will be located in the trees and it is hidden from view by a knoll. 6) FARRELL - DRIVE -UP BANK - O'DELL PARKWAY - PRELIMINARY PLAT This project consists of the construction of a 2260 square foot drive -up bank facility with three (3) drive -up lanes on a lot which includes Bambino's, WVNY-TV station and Seaway Car Wash. This project is considered a PCD because it involves three (3) lots and four (4) buildings. A drive-?n bank is permitted only as part of a PCD. A revised sketch was reviewd on 12/8/92 (minutes enclosed). 3 Memorandum - Planning April 13, 1993 agenda items April 9, 1993 Page 4 This project is located in both the Cl and C2 Districts. It is bounded on the west by Shelburne Road, on the south by the Factory Outlet Mall and undeveloped property, on the east by Farrell Street and on the north by Twin Oaks fitness center, seven (7) single family residences on Hadley Road, an apartment building and an auto service station. Access/circulation: Access to the property is via a 40 foot curb cut on Shelburne Road for O'Dell Parkway (a private r.o.w.), Bacon Street (a 50 foot private r.o.w.), two (2) access drives to the Factory Outlet Mall and a 60 foot r.o.w. which is 520 feet long extending from Farrell Street to the project site. The main access (O'Dell Parkway) is now shown as a future City street and will be constructed to City standards from Shelburne Road to Bambino's. The easterly portion of the street from Bambino's to Farrell Street will cross land owned by New Enterprises, Inc. This portion of the street will not be constructed at this time. An "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication" must be submitted prior to recording of final plat and reviewed by the City Attorney from both the applicant and New Enterprises, Inc. for this future street. If the street is to be accepted by the City before it is constructed all the way to Farrell Street, a turn -around should be constructed that is acceptable to the City Engineer. The applicant has incorporated the Planning Commission's recommendations that the O'Dell Parkway r.o.w. be 60 feet wide from Shelburne Road to Farrell Street, and that all parking spaces be moved outside of the r.o.w. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 11.6.E (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 51.9% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage of 30% will be met on the north side of O'Dell Parkway east of Bambino's. Front yard coverage in front of and west of Bambino's is not met. This is a pre-existing nonconforming situation. The new bank building will meet the setback requirements. All other existing buildings will meet the setback from the O'Dell Parkway r.o.w. 4 Memorandum - Planning April 13, 1993 agenda items April 9, 1993 Page 5 LandscapLing: The minimum landscaping requirement for the site is $9,900 ($4,500 for Ben Franklin and $5,400 for the bank) and is not being met. This requirement is $5,050 short of minimum required. Staff recommends that the size of the trees be increased to make up the shortfall. Plantings proposed include Flowering Almond, Littleleaf Linden, Red Oak and Andorra Juniper. Street trees proposed are only 1 1/2" caliper. Section 412.4 of the subdivision regulations requires a minimum of 2" caliper trees. Parking: The entire site requires a total of 357 parking spaces and only 258 spaces are being provided. This is a shortfall of 99 spaces or 28%. The applicant has indicated that there are some shared parking opportunities but has not submitted a shared parking analysis. The existing agreement that permits the applicant to use 50 spaces on the Heathcote property during the day and 100 spaces after 6:00 P.M. will leave a shortfall of 49 spaces during the day and no shortfall in the evening. A shared parking analysis could reduce or possibility eliminate the day time shortfall. Parking aisle on the south side of Ben Franklin should be 24 feet wide with 9 foot wide parallel parking spaces. Traffic: The applicant is still working on their traffic impact analysis. They have indicated that they will submit it to the City on Monday. I will review it prior to the meeting. Bikepath: The plans show an eight (8) foot wide bikepath along the south side of O'Dell Parkway. This bikepath will connect to the Phase III bikepath which will be constructed in the next 2-3 years. Lighting: Street lighting will consist of eight (8) 250 watt metal halide lamps with cutoff luminaires on 20 foot poles. Applicant should check with Green Mountain Power to see if Green Mountain Power will maintain. Site lighting will consists of: --- six (6) 20 foot poles each with lamps with cutoff luminaires. --- four ( 4 ) 20 foot poles each with lamps with cutoff luminaires 61 two (2) 250 watt metal halide one (1) 250 watt metal halide Memorandum - Planning April 13, 1993 agenda items April 9, 1993 Page 6 The new bank lighting will consist of soffit lighting with no glare effects. Lighting at Bambino's and Ben Franklin will not change. All existing lighting should be appropriately shielded and directed so as not to cast light beyond the property lines. Other: --- vacuum island for car wash should be identified on plan.' --- all dumpsters on the site will be screened with a six ( 6 ) foot stockade fence. --- the existing eight (8) foot stockade fence located behind Bambino's will be relocated to the north side of the new parking area. --- road cross sections should be submitted for final plat.}! --- fire hydrant symbol should be consistent through out the plans. --- the name of the abutter "Reyes" should be correctly spelled on ,� sheets C-2, C-3 and SE-1. 7) CHITTENDEN BANK -•DRIVE-UP RELOCATION - SITE PLAN This project consists of the relocation of a 900 square foot drive - up canopy, construction of a 200 square foot entrance vestibule and a 200 square foot drive -up window to an existing drive -up bank facility. These changes are being made as a result of the Dorset Street reconstruction and the loss of one (1) curb cut. A variance was granted by the Zoning Board of Adjustment on 3/22/93 to allow the canopy to encroach into the rear setback. This property located at 55 Dorset Street lies within the Cl District. It is bounded on the north by the access road to the Park Construction site and Howard Johnson's motel and restaurant, on the west by the Park Construction site, on the south by the University Mall parking area and on the east by Dorset Street. Access/circulation: The property currently has two (2) curb cuts. The northerly curb cut will be closed as part of the Dorset Street reconstruction project and the southerly curb cut will be widened to 35 feet. The remaining curb cut will access Dorset Street at the signalized intersection opposite the access to 100 Dorset Street and will have one (1) ingress lane and two (2) egress lanes. 0 Memorandum - Planning April 27, 1993 agenda items April 23, 1993 Page 5 is privately owixed. Section 19.202(b) of the zoning regulations limits the number of lots served off a private r.o.w. to three (3). Since there are already three (3) lots served off this r.o.w., a condition should be attached which requires that prior to issuance of a zoning permit for development on this lot, that Oakwood Drive be upgraded to City standard and an irrevocable offer of dedication be recorded. A "Notice of Condition" regarding this condition should be recorded in the land records. Water and Sewer: This lot is served by City water and sewer. The sewer allocation for this project is 450 gpd. The per gallon fee would have to be paid prior to permit. Recreation Fee: The developer of this parcel will be required to pay the per un i t rar-raat i nn fc�A in of fArrt at +-►,,, i- i mo a zoning/building permit is issued for construction on this lot. Other: --- The 11.64 acre lot on sheet SP1 should be designated lot #1 and the Veve lot designated lot #2. --- acreage of lot #2 should be noted on the plat. --- graphic scale should be lengthened so that when the plat is reduced for recording it will be at least 5" in length to meet the state plat law. 4) FARRELL - CHITTENDEN BANK This item was continued to allow the CCRPC to review the traffic study. Enclosed are the staff memos from the previous meeting. Also enclosed is a letter from Lamoureax & Stone, representatives of Heathcote Associates, and Frank Kochman, an adjoining residential landowner. Traffic: Enclosed is the original traffic study dated 4/9/93 and an addendum dated 4/14/93. At the last meeting, the applicant was encouraged to reevaluate the analysis to see if there was a way to improve estimated LOS for the north and south approaches of the Odell Parkway/Shelburne Street intersection so as not to exceed LOS "D". The reevaluation is contained in the addendum, dated 4/14/93. According to the new study, LOS could be improved so that the north and south approaches do not fall below "D". In addition, it appears that proposed que lengths are improved as compared to those 5 Memorandum - Planning April 27, 1993 April 23, 1993 Page 6 estimated in the 4/9/93 study. These improved results are realized by incorporating a protected -permitted operation for Shelburne Street left -turns rather than only a protected operation. While the 4/14/93 appears to show a more acceptable situation as earlier anticipated, staff still has the following concerns: o The Home Avenue/Odell Parkway signal is apparently the northernmost signal is a series of eleven coordinated signals along the Route 7 corridor. The three (3) northernmost signals are owned and maintained by the City of Burlington while the remaining eight (8) signals are owned and maintained by the VAOT. The analysis assumes changes to the signal phasing, however, there has been no analysis of the impact such changes will have on the signal coordination along the corridor. o It is estimated that the que length for the north approach left - turn w;11 hA 195 feet while the stacking lane is only 85 feet. The applicant should consider and evaluate the possibility of extending this stacking lane an additional 100 feet to provide adequate stacking. The City of Burlington has informed me that they need to evaluate and approve any proposed changes to the timing of the Odell Parkway intersection before such changes are implemented. Staff recommends that the City of Burlington review the traffic study and provide comment at least prior to Final Plat review. Other: Staff agrees with Mr. Kochman's recommendation that additional landscaping be provided along the residential properties. Staff also agrees that a 12 foot high stockade fence would provide better screening than the proposed 8 foot high fence. In addition, as previously recommended, all existing lighting, particularly i,i at around Bambino's, should `uc puilli.cu downward so as not to cast light beyond the property line. 5) CHAMPLAIN OIL - CONVENIENCE STORE/GAS SALES - SITE PLAN This project consists of the razing of a service station to be replaced with new gasoline pumps, a 1,012 square foot convenience store, 2,952 square foot canopy and 324 square foot accessory building. The Zoning Board of Adjustment on February 22, 1993 granted the applicants a conditional use permit for multiple use N. PLANNING COMMISSION 29 June 1993 page 2 4. Public Hearing: Continued Preliminary Plat application of Hannaford Brothers Company for a 12 building planned commercial development consisting of a new 64,000 sq. ft. supermarket, new 107,806 sq. ft. department store, 79,740 sq. ft. of new retail space, a new 95 room hotel, a new 6,000 sq. ft. restaurant, a new 2,500 sq. ft. bank with drive -through service, an existing 6,014 sq. ft. restaurant and existing 6,150 sq. ft. fast food restaurant with drive -through service, on 41.9 acres of land, Southland, Shelburne Rd: Mr. Austin stepped down during this discussion. Mr. White noted that they still haven't gotten the letter from the Agency of Transportation which was requested by the Planning Commission, so they are again requesting a continuance. Mrs. Maher moved to continue the Public Hearing on the Hannaford Brothers Company application until the second Tuesday in Sep- tember. Mr. Craig seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Austin rejoined the Commission. 5. Public Hearing: Final Plat application of David Farrell & Stuart McConaughy, Trustees, Thomas Farrell, Donor; Farrell Corp; & David Farrell for a planned commercial development consisting of a new bank building with drive -through service, existing car wash, existing office building, existing res- taurant/bar building, and leased parking for the adjoining Ben Franklin business, Shelburne Road: Mr. Weith noted the plans have been revised with 2 major changes: there is now angled parking to the south of Ben Franklin and landscaping along the Hadley Rd. residences has been changed. Mr. Webster said they had spent time with the neighbors and have reached an understanding of what is to be done. Some species of plantings have been added on the berm (there will be fewer willows and they will be further back from the pro- perty line; there will be three 12-foot pines between the willows plus a number of cedars in the shelter of the willows and a number of hemlock. They also discussed getting the storm drain running properly. This will require the creation of a swale. Cedars will be limed and mulched. The berm will vary in height from 4 to 5 feet. It will be 16 to 22 ft. wide. Regarding the fence, Mr. Webster said they have accentuated the berm that the fence is on top of. Mr. O'Brien added that there is a break in the berm for drainage. Mr. Kochman added PLANNING COMMISSION 29 June 1993 page 3 that the applicant has also agreed not to touch any existing overhang in the trees. He said the remaining issue is timing and there is no agreement on that. Mr. Webster said they are not sure how long Act 250 will take. He said the issue is the timing of landscaping screening. After a brief discussion, the applicant agreed to have screening in before occupancy of the bank. Mr. Carroll expressed concern on the part of Ben Franklin that the road isn't torn up after November 1st as it would close the store down during the Christmas season. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the Final Plat application of David Farrell & Stuart McConaughy, Trustees, Thomas Farrell, Donor; Farrell Corporation; and David Farrell for a planned commercial development consisting of new 2,260 sq. ft. bank with drive -through service, existin car wash, existing office building, existing restaurant bar building, and leased parking for the adjoining Ben Franklin business as de- picted on an eleven page set of plans, page one entitled "Pro- perty Plan, O'Dell Park PCD," prepared by Civil engineering Associates, Inc., and dated 2/93, last revised 4/1/93 with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approvals and stipulations affecting the sub- ject property which are not superseded I�IZ this approval shall remain in effect. 2. All proposed and existing exterior site lighting shall be appropriately shielded or pointed so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in existing lighting or new lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 3. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit, the applicant shall post a landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value of proposed street trees and site landscaping. A $45,000 h bond sall be posted for the site landscaping and a $9,400 bond for the street trees. The bonds shall remain in effect for three ey ars to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has z good chance of surviving. 4. Legal documents for the proposed public street r.o.w. (i.e, irrevocable offer of dedication) and easements (e.g, drainage easement) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and shall be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for the new bank building. PLANNING COMMISSION 29 June 1993 page 4 5. Prior to recording the final plat plans, a "Notice of Con- dition shall be recorded in the land records which identifies this entiredevelopment as a planned commercial development (PCD) and which legally ties all the lots in this development into one PCD for all planning, zoning and subdivision purposes. 6. A bond for all improvements within the future street r.o.w. (i.e, street construction, sidewalks, storm sewer, etc) shall be posted prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new street until such time as the street and r.o.w. is accepted and taken over by the City. 8. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 120 gpd for the new bank bulding. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 9. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit, the appli- cant shall contribute $4,416 to the Shelburne Road Intersection Improvement Fund based on the 172 additional peak hour trip ends estimated to be generated by this development. 10. In accordance with section 301.5 of the subdivision regu- lations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements., within the future public street r.o.w. (i.e, streets, water, sewer and storm drain lines, sidewalks, etc.), the developer shall submit to the City.FnginPPr "as built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 11. The applicant shall be responsible for implementing the following improvements at the Shelburne Street/Home Avenue/ Odell Parkway intersection: 1) retime the signal phasing, and 2) install a longer left -turn stacking lane for the south - bound approach. The improvements shall be implemented in ac- cordance with the recommendations contained in the traffic impact analysis submitted 12y the applicant and shall be coordin- ated with the City of Burlington. The improvements shall be implemented prior to or within a reasonable time following occupancy of the building. 12 The final plat plans shall be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall -be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to record nerd g PLANNING COMMISSION 29 June 1993 page 5 13. The applicant shall obtain a certificate of occupancy permit from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the building. 14. The plans shall be revised prior to recording and prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit to show the following: a. The note on Sheet C-2 referring to a "min. 12' clear for maint- enance vehicles" shall be changed to 1112' clear for maintenance vehicles." b) On sheet C-9, the buffer section shall indicate that the 4 inches of shredded bark mulch shall be put on the berm, c) Sheet C-2 shall show an additional red pine behind Haskins. d) The base of the cedars shall be limed. 15. The berm shall be constructed and berm landscaping in- stalled prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for the bank bu li dina. 16. Based upon the expressed representation of the applicant, the fence shielding the Bambino's Restaurant parking lot shall be removed for the minimum period of time necessary to complete the construction of the berm and the relocation of the fence. Mr. Craig seconded the motion which then passed unanimously. 6. Discussion update of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations: a. UVM lands: Mr. Weith noted that for the land north of I-189 there had been discussion about creating a new district. He then pre- sented a possible Institutional & Agricultural District for only UVM lands. All residential and privately held land would remain as now zoned. The City .Attorney is not concerned about spot zoning because of the historical use of these lands. The following conditional uses would also be allowed: educational facilities, support facilities for educational facilities, and research & testing. Minimum lot size would be 10 acres. Maximum density would be 1 per 10 acres with maximum building coverage of 10% and maximum building/parking/outside storage coverage of 20%. Setbacks would be: 75' front, 50' side and rear. 1 CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P. O. Box 485 (802) 985-2323 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 Fax No. (802) 985-2271 CHARLES R. DUNHAM President June 2, 1993 STEP ViceHEN A. VOCK Vice President JEAN -CAROL DUNHAM Treasurer Mr. Ray Belair Zoning & Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: O'Dell Park PCD Final Plat Application Dear Mr. Belair: Please find enclosed 5 copies of the revised Final Plat Plans for the proposed O'Dell Park PCD. We have made revisions to the plans to reflect both the needs of the City regarding a turn -around at the end of O'Dell Parkway, as well as minor modifications to the Site Development Plan to reflect the needs of the Ben Franklin store and to bring the project more in line with budget constraints. We offer the following descriptions of the modifications included in these revisions: 1. Sheet C-1 Property Plan - This plan has been revised to include a call out respective of the 50' wide access easement in favor of the Champlain Oil Company. In addition, the acreage (0.03) of the remaining Farrell Corporation parcel located just south of the O'Dell Park R.O.W. near Shelburne Street was added. 2. Sheet C-2 Site and Landscaping Plan - This plan reflects the elimination of the mass plantings proposed east of the Kochman property in favor of additional Willow plantings. The proposed Rosa Multi -Flora planting bed to be located between the existing cedar hedge and the proposed Willows was eliminated for cost and maintenance considerations. The truck loading access to the Ben Franklin building (NE corner) was revised to provide access to left side, right side and rear unloading requirements. For this reason we have retained the existing vacuum cleaner island and have converted the western long island between the Ben Franklin building and the new bank building to a painted island to facilitate periodic truck deliveries. The stockade fence on the north side of Bambino's to be relocated has been moved approximately 10 feet to the north to facilitate snow removal and storage. Again to facilitate snow removal, some curbed islands were converted to painted islands. These modifications required the elimination of 4 trees from the landscaping plan. STUDIES • DESIGN • INSPECTION • TESTING SURVEYING & LAND DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULICS & HYDROLOGY SANITARY 8 WATER FOUNDATIONS & STRUCTURES CONCRETE & SOIL TESTING Mr. Ray Belair Page 2 June 2, 1993 Some curbing on the northern and eastern limits of the PCD has been eliminated. The eastern most overflow parking lot surface has been changed to a processed aggregate surface in lieu of paving. To maintain orderly parking, precast concrete parking curbs are shown to be installed at each of the parking spaces. 3. Sheet C-3 Overall Utility Plan - This plan reflects the modifications outlined for sheet C-2 except that the locations of CB's 13 and 14 were modified to reflect the elimination of some curbing near the proposed bank building and the Ben Franklin building. 4. Sheets C-4 and C-5 Utility and Grading Plans - These sheets reflect the modifications to Sheet C-3 except that the grading has been revised in the areas where curbing has been eliminated and for the moving of the stockade fence to the north. A gravel turn -around is shown to be installed at the end of O'Dell Parkway prior to acceptance by the City provided that the City exercises its option to acquire the New Enterprise 60' R.O.W. Also enclosed for your use is a revised construction cost estimate for the O'Dell Parkway right-of-way and for the remaining site work. A break out of the proposed landscaping costs is also enclosed for your use. Finally, information on recommended dimensions for parallel parking from AASHTO is enclosed to support the parking configuration on the south side of the Ben Franklin building. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 985-2323 or James Lamphere at 655-5020. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, David S. Marshall Project Engineer DSM:pao Enclosures cc: J. Lamphere r W. GEOMETRIC DESIGN of HIGHWAYS and STREETS �O�S�EEE NI6HWAI,A,���9' 4� y✓,e o r b \�f Sam AASHTOTM American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Suite 225, 444 North Capitol Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 624-5800 Copyright, 1984, by American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All rights reserved. This book, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Cross Section Elements 453 In the construction of new roadway, pavement construction proce- dures should be carefully considered so as to provide a longitudinal pavement joint at the boundary of the proposed parking lane. It has been found that such joints aid in ensuring that the parked vehicle clears the parallel travel lane. On asphalt -surfaced streets, pavement markings arc recommended to identify the parking lane. The marking of parking spaces encourages more orderly and efficient use of parking spaces where parking turnover occurs and tends to prevent encroach- ment on fire hydrant zones, bus stops, loading zones, and approaches to corners. In urban areas and, in particular, within central business districts and commercial areas where significant pedestrian crossings are likely to occur, the design of the parking lane and intersection relationship should be given consideration. When the parking lane is carried up to the intersection, motorists may develop one additional lane for right - turn movements. Such movements may cause operational problems and often result in turning vehicles mounting the curb and possibly striking such intersection elements as traffic signals, utility poles, or street -light standards. The transitioning out of the parking lane a minimum of 20 ft in advance of the intersection will eliminate this problem. An example of such treatment is shown in Figure IV-36. Sym. About C.L. 22' to 26' 20' 8' 20' Min. 8' Property Line I Figure IV-36. Parking lane transition at intersection. Memorandum - Planning June 29, 1993 agenda items June 26, 1993 Page 2 5() CHITTENDEN BANK PCD - FARRELL PROPERTY, ODELL PARKWAY The applicant has submitted revised plans showing a revised parking layout south and west of the Ben Franklin building and a new landscaping buffer plan along the Hadley Road residences (see enclosed). The landscape plan proposes a 4' - 5' high berm with an assortment of plant species including 8' cedar, 8' hemlock, 12' red pine, and willows. The revised plans also propose a 2' berm north of the parking lot behind Bambinos. The 8' stockade fence will sit on top of this berm and should adequately block headlight glare from Hadley Road residences. Staff recommends approval of the final plat application. 6) ZONING REGULATIONS UPDATE a) UVM Lands: Enclosed is a draft zoning district entitled" Institutional and Agricultural" for the UVM lands north of I-189. At this point I am proposing only to zone the UVM lands this new district. Currently, the UVM lands north of I-189 are zoned differently than other private lands along Spear Street. Therefore, if spot zoning has not been a concern under current zoning, why should it be now? I will consult with Steve Stitzel before Tuesday. In summary, the I -A district would allow only agricultural uses as permitted uses. Conditional uses would include educational facilities, support facilities for educational institutions, research and testing (i.e., Maple Research Lab ?), and utility substations. Minimum lot size for all uses is 10 acres. The R4 District has been revised to eliminate educational facilities as conditional uses. Higher educational facilities devoted to agricultural and horticultural study, and related buildings, has been added as conditional uses. Also enclosed is a land use survey of the area involved (see Exhibit A). b) Articles I - XVIII: Enclosed is a draft update of Articles I through XVIII and a report which summarizes the substantive changes proposed in each district. 2 Memorandum - Planning June 22, 1993 agenda items June 18, 1993 Page 2 Parking: The Zoning Board when they granted the variance expressed concern that this subdivision not eliminate parking spaces. They stated that "if satisfactory parking can't be reconciled to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission, that this variance if granted be null and void". Parking for #41 would be just to the north of the house in an existing parking area. Parking for #43 would be in the driveway between the two houses. The purpose of the zero lot line is to provide enough room for parking. An easement would also be granted over a portion of the lot at #41 for access around the rear of the the property to a parking space on the so-called "well" lot. This "well" lot is owned by the applicant and is contiguous to the lot at #41. The final plat should show an easement to access this parking space. Lot merger: The "well" lot is automatically merged with this property as required under State law. Staff consulted with the City Attorney on this matter and he agrees with this position. If these lots have merged, then the lot line separating the "well" lot from the remainder of the property should not be shown. It should be surveyed and made part of the main lot for final plat. 4) FARRELL - DRIVE -UP BANK - O'DELL PARKWAY - FINAL PLAT This project consists of the construction of a 2260 square foot drive -up bank facility with three (3) drive -up lanes on a lot which includes Bambino's, WVNY-TV station and Seaway Car Wash. This project is considered a PCD because it involves three (3) lots and four (4) buildings. A drive-in bank is permitted only as part of a PCD. The preliminary plat was approved on 4/27/93 (minutes enclosed). This project is located in both the Cl and C2 Districts. It is bounded on the west by Shelburne Road, on the south by the Factory Outlet Mall and undeveloped property, on the east by Farrell Street and on the north by Twin Oaks fitness center, seven (7) single family residences on Hadley Road, an apartment building and an auto service station. Access/circulation: Access to the property is via a 40 foot curb cut on Shelburne Road for O'Dell Parkway (a private r.o.w.), Bacon Street (a 50 foot private r.o.w.), two (2) access drives to the E Memorandum - Planning June 22, 1993 agenda items June 18, 1993 Page 3 Factory Outlet Mall and a 60 foot r.o.w. which is 520 feet long extending from Farrell Street to the project site. The main access (O'Dell Parkway) is shown as a future City street and will be constructed to City standards from Shelburne Road to Bambino's. The easterly portion of the street from Bambino's to Farrell Street will cross land owned by New Enterprises, Inc. This portion of the street will not be constructed at this time.' An "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication" must be submitted prior to recording of final plat and reviewed by the City Attorney from both the applicant and New Enterprises, Inc. A temporary turn -around is to be installed at the end of O'Dell Parkway prior to City acceptance of the roadway. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 11.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 52.5% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage of 30% will be met on the north side of O'Dell Parkway east of Bambino's. Front yard coverage in front of and west of Bambino's is not met. This is a pre-existing nonconforming situation. The new bank building will meet the setback requirements. All other existing buildings will meet the setback from the O'Dell Parkway r.o.w. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement for the site is $9,900 ($4,500 for Ben Franklin and $5,400 for the bank) and is being met. Plantings proposed include Flowering Almond, Littleleaf Linden, Red Oak and Andorra Juniper. One of the preliminary plat conditions required that the plan be revised to show "larger sizes for proposed site landscaping species". The site landscaping species have not been increased in size. One of the preliminary plat conditions required the final plat to show a substantial amount of additional landscaping to better screen this development from the Hadley Road properties. The applicant has proposed to: 1) add a double row cedar hedge along the rear of the Haskins property to fill in a gap in the existing cedar hedge, 2) add a row of 16 Weeping Willows just to the south of the cedar hedge, 3) add a second row of cedars to supplement an existing row of cedars across the width of the r.o.w. to Hadley Road, and 4) add four (4) Weeping Willow trees within the r.o.w. between the cedar hedge and Hadley Road. Staff recommends that a row of evergreen trees, substantial in height (perhaps 10' high 3 Memorandum - Planning June 22, 1993 agenda items June 18, 1993 Page 4 hemlock) be added between the rows of cedar and the row of Weeping Willows. In addition, the spacing between willows should be reduced to perhaps 30'. Parking: The entire site requires a total of 357 parking spaces and only 283 spaces are being provided. This is a shortfall of 74 spaces or 21%. A "future parking" area is proposed at the easterly end of the site which contains 98 parking spaces. Additional parking spaces have been added near the Seaway Car Wash as requested by the Planning Commission. Traffic: The preliminary plat approval included a condition that the traffic analysis be submitted to the City of Burlington for review and approval. The analysis has been submitted, however, comments have not yet been received from Burlington. The applicant hopes to have comments by Tuesday. Bikepath : The plans show an eight ( 8 ) foot wide bikelane along the south side of O'Dell Parkway. This bikelane will connect to they Phase III bikepath which will be constructed in the next 2-3 years. Lighting: Street lighting will consist of eight (8) 150 wait high pressure sodium lamps mounted on 25 foot poles. These are the type maintained by Green Mountain Power. The site lighting has been changed since preliminary approval. The poles have been reduced in height and the lamps reduced in wattage. Site lighting will now consist of the following: --- eight (8) 14 foot poles each with halide lamps with cutoff luminaries. --- five (5) 14 foot poles each with one lamp with cutoff luminarie. --- two (2) 16 foot poles each with two lamps with cutoff luminaries. --- eight (8) 16 foot poles each with halide lamp with cutoff luminarie. two (2) 175 watt metal (1) 175 watt metal halide (2) 175 watt metal halide one (1) 175 watt metal The new bank lighting will consist of soffit lighting with no glare effects. Lighting at Ben Franklin will not change. Two (2) nonshielded lights at Bambino's will be changed to the shielded type. All existing lighting should be appropriately shielded and directed so as not to cast light beyond the property lines. 4 Memorandum - Planning June 22, 1993 agenda items June 18, 1993 Page 5 Notice of Condition: Prior to recording the final plat plans, a "Notice of Condition" should be recorded in the land records which identifies this entire development as a planned commercial development (PCD) and which legally ties all the lots in this development into one PCD for all planning, zoning and subdivision purposes. Other: --- the molt, easte row of parking in the future parking area consists of 1 spaces noP'19 as indicated on sheet C2. --- see enclosed etter from the Hadley Road neighbors. 5) RALPH GOODRICH - OFFICE BUILDING - SITE PLAN This project consists of the construction of a four (4) story 26,000 square foot general office building. This office building will displace a contractor's yard, an office/maintenance building and an accessory building. The Zoning Board of Adjustment on 5/24/93 granted the applicant a conditional use permit for this proposed office building. This property located at 625 Hinesburg Road lies within the R7 District. It is bounded on the north by Kennedy Drive, on the east by Hinesburg Road, on the south by Country Park apartments and on the west by Timberlane Medical Center. Traffic: This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 1 which limits this property to 23 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. The proposed building is estimated to generate 68.9 vte's. This represents 45.9 vte's more than permitted or 199% above allowable limits. Since the number of proposed trip ends far exceeds the number permitted, staff recommends that this project not be approved by the Planning Commission. Staff suggests that the project either be scaled back to not exceed the trip end limit, relocate the access at least 17 feet further away from the intersection to then be in Traffic Overlay Zone 5 or change the proposed use to one that doesn't generate so much traffic such as residential. The applicant does not agree with staff's interpretation that the site's access is less than 300 feet from the Kennedy 5 SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION RE: O'DELL PARK, A PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT DAVID M. FARRELL AND STUART McCONAUGHEY, TRUSTEES, THOMAS A. FARRELL, DONOR; FARRELL CORPORATION; AND DAVID M. FARRELL, APPLICANTS RESOLUTION Upon motion made, seconded and unanimously passed, it was RESOLVED, that the approval of the South Burlington Planning Commission of certain properties of David M. Farrell and Stuart McConaughy, Trustees, Thomas A. Farrell, Donor; Farrell Corporation and David M. Farrell as a Planned Commercial development ("PCD") which was initially approved by South Burlington Planning Commission on June 29, 1993, the plat thereof being recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records on , 1993 in Plat Volume at Page is hereby RATIFIED and VALIDATED in all respects, subject to all requirements and conditions of the resolution and approval of the South Burlington Planning Commission dated June 29, 1993. The sole and exclusive purpose of the within resolution is to establish compliance with the provisions of 24 V.S.A. 4416. Dated this day of October, 1993. SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION Planning Commission O'DELL PARR SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT PROJECT COST ESTIMATE 1,425 LF Concrete Curbing x $ 12.00/LF = 17,100 1,130 SY New Pavement w/ Recycled Material x $ 10.00/SY = 11,300 3,640 SY New Gravel Parking w/ Recycled Material x $ 3.00/SY = 10,920 122 EA Precast Parking Curbs x $ 32,00/EA = 3,300 300 SY New Parking Lots/Drives x $ 12.00/SY = 3,600 215 LF 12" Storm Drains x $ 20.00/LF = 4,300 340 LF 15" Storm Drains x $ 25.00/LF = 8,500 69 LF 18" Storm Drains x $ 30.00/LF = 2,070 10 EA Drainage Structures x $1,200.00/EA = 121000 2,980 SF Concrete Sidewalk x $ 3.50/SF = 10,430 305 LF 1" Water Service x $ 20.00/LF = 6,100 185 LF 6" Sanitary Sewer Lateral x $ 18.00/LF = 3,330 700 SY Misc. Access Drive Const. and Pavement Repair x $ 9.00/SY = 6,300 25 LF Gas Service x $ 20.00/LF = 500 20 EA Lighting Fixtures x $1,600.00/EA = 32,000 1,100 LF Lighting Conduit/wire x $ 10.00/LF = 11,000 Lump Sum Demolition/Earthwork 101000 Lump Sum Striping 2,000 SUBTOTAL $154,750 10% MISCELLANEOUS 15,450 BUILDING COST (EST.) 180,000 SUBTOTAL PROJECT COST $350,200 ROW CONSTRUCTION COST 219,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST 569 200 `T0F4— i 5-93 TUE � : z 1 CEA P . 0 2 OfDELL PARK PROJECT COST ESrrMATE Page 2 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING: 3% x 250,000 2% x 120,000 $7, 500 2,400 9 900 ON SITE LANASCAPTNG COST ESTIMATE 1_ey u8ntitv +30tanica1 Name Common Name Unit--P—rice Cost 35 Prunus Glandulosa Dwarf Flowering Almond x $125/EA = $ 4,375 B 11 r .? is Corpata Littiele of Linden 1 x $160,/EA = $ 1,760 C Nortr.tl•n Red Oak x $160/EA = $ 2,400 * 30 Juniperis Horizontalis Andorra Juniper x $ 15/EA = $ 450 W 20 ;:alix Babylonica Weeping Wjjln_Fjs x $250/EA = $ 5, 000 D 10 Thuja Northern Ocicidentalis White Cedar x $ 75/EA 750 STREET TREES COST ESTIMATE A®YQuantity B, .anical_ Name B 10 i:.ii.a Corpata C 19 Rubra SITE LANDSCAPING TOTAL = $14,735 I cmor_Mama unit price test Littl.eleaf Lirden x $a10/EA = $ 9 Northern Red Oak x $325/EA = $ 6,175 STREET TREE TOTAL $�3, Oil; 75- O'DELL PARKWAY R.O.W. CONSTRUCTION SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT PROJECT COST ESTIMATE May 11, 1993 720 CY 6" Sand Cushion x $ 7.00/CY = $ 5,040 1,450 CY 12" Gravel Subbase x $ 10.00/CY = 14,500 340 CY 3" Crushed Gravel Base x $ 14.00/CY = 4,760 585 TON -2?" Bituminous Concrete Base Course x $ 40.00/TON = 23,400 360 TON 12" Bituminous Concrete Surface Course x $ 40.00/TON = 14,400 2,025 LF Concrete Curbing x $ 12.00/LF = 24,330 299 LF 12" Storm Drains x $ 20.00/SY = 5,980 170 LF 15" Storm Drains x $ 25.00/LF = 4,250 433 LF 18" Storm Drains x $ 30.00/LF = 12,990 13 EA Drainage Structures x $1,200.00/EA = 15,600 5,890 SF Concrete Sidewalk x $ 3.50/SF = 20,615 610 SY Misc. Access Drive Construction x $ 12.00/SY = 7,320 8 EA Lighting Fixtures x $2,000.00/EA = 16,000 1,000 LF Lighting Conduit x $ 10.00/LF = 10,000 2,750 CY Excavation of Pavement x $ 5.00/CY = 13,750 Lump Sum Demolition (Lighting) 5,000 Lump Sum Striping 1,200 SUBTOTAL $199,105 10% MISCELLANEOUS 19,895 TOTAL PROJECT COST f / 219 000 a C/ ��r.S�"✓.,� C �j�/i � G�®5� ui � ��.-7 //'cam / 7„S' a��� REDUGED FROM Oil16INAL NOT TO SGALE — //// IOGATIOW G@71(! FAGTpFty glfLp7T� 0�a{ fl/F lJ[YY EM$aFIi15B. ING. i CHEERS LOCATION PLAN 9C 1 SCALE, I" - 100' - 0" 6aeiK NOTES Isaac is HA�rt A ewv�s ,vrA aF ieu en. Pr. tara�rnw ia.L nswpNMee Aio PunNeai. GIANe®M ocuvwcr LOb as Nef9t41 of �� aunty re PNOIO9EO. 1Bd�K To 9E O+R� FABpNM1Y, LTl0.rtb OATiRE 14W OP OPIRATbN ONLY. t�leN PANT I6 io OfSAIE A Bf`MAY1OBtD OEIK IAE/N PAi11TNT® Rid1 oa9T1w 911 PAWCWe. �IIC Gfe59 WLL AEMAN OfBI, N0 PLAN1@tl ILLL aE 1'IpK/Elt IN OAlE Of tT16MENLY. LNCKIPE LiEfBR9 Nl1 tL P6QRNAL, NID 1'tL 9E 1!-0.Nf1ID B!/MONALLY, Nff ENrenw 9HlBERY YIl1 S leRNRID. NO IQAY:TNM M 91TE elffi19PA:E I�i PROPOYn. /'aN CHEE12S TERRACE PL.W 9KI SCAM, M • 1'-IT Bill Edwards' 71RJ L.J�r111 J� Sou� ZA th Shelburne Road wo U0 VT% -I South Burlington, Vermont 5/29/hb ® u �7 0 1 ! 9 4 9 10 0 5 10 19 m 90 40 90 PM TERRACE PERSPECTIVE VIEW 9K I SCALE, kTa 9c I SCALE, Wa ❑VAbMtein I00 Church Strut Burlingi-- Vermont 05401 USA (802)864-8334 1-800-487-9346 ww.tep th—et/—awllata/-A" 1� LU Z O F-- V D C� td� z �0 V z Frank Kochman 75 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 June 16, 1993 Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Hadley Road Residents' "Petition to South Burlington Plan- ning Commission Concerning Proposed O'Dell Park Planned Commer- cial Development." Dear Joe: In anticipation of the Planning Commission meeting of June 22, enclosed please find the captioned petition, signed by 20 residents of Hadley Road representing 15 separate residences. There may well be more signatures coming on separate copies of the same petition. I enclose extra copies to facilitate distribu- tion to the members of the Planning Commission. At the April 27 meeting, one of the members remarked that she was under the impression that the neighbors were somehow not in agreement about the appropriateness of the Farrells' plans. That is a misimpression, which this petition is intended to cor- rect. As you can see, there is overwhelming agreement that the landscaping and screening proposal is completely inadequate, and there is also overwhelming agreement as to the minimum changes necessary to address the common concerns. In addition, some of the neighbors have special concerns. For example, Mrs. Griggs at 29 Hadley seeks fencing that con- ceals all of the commercial buildings, especially the car wash, which became her backyard view when the woods were stripped away. Dr. Barney at 37 Hadley particularly wants to see an earth berm as part of the screening. Jennifer and I are specially concerned that the proposed (and largely beside the point) plantings in the right of way will block the only physical access we have to our backyard for emergency and service vehicles. (We have a legal right to the access and the house was built the way it is in obvious contemplation of that right.) We hope that the petition will serve to convey how strongly the neighbors feel about the inadequacy of the final plat. Sincerely, Frank Kochman enclosure cc: (with enclosure) Michael Flaherty, Chairman Joseph A. Parent, 67 Hadley Road Susan Bashaw, 73 Hadley Road Sarah and Ron Cadorette, 71 Hadley Road Louise P. Brooks, 33 Hadley Road Bernard Barney and Jane Quilliam, 37 Hadley Road Peter Kunin, 70 Hadley Road Milford and Dorothy Delorme, 99 Hadley Road William Pearson, 89 Hadley Road Nancy Sherman, 86 Hadley Road Hollace and Brian Reed, 80 Hadley Road Lucy T. Brown, 94 Hadley Road Janet V. Delneo, 66 Hadley Road Billie and Glen Griggs, 29 Hadley Road 2 PETITION TO SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CONCERNING PROPOSED O'DELL PARK PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT We, residents of Hadley Road, have examined the fencing and landscaping plans for the O'Dell Park Planned Commercial Develop- ment as shown on Sheet C-2 of the final plat submission. We note that the minutes of the 12/8/92 Planning Commission Meeting say "Members emphasized that they will ask for sufficient landscaping and screening for neighbors in the residential area." We thank the Planning Commission for expressing that inten- tion. We think the new landscaping to the south of the Hadley Road property lines is not deep enough, dense enough, or other- wise adequate to provide effective and aesthetically acceptable screening, and that the moved -back fence is not high enough. In particular: 1. The plat says that the willows will each be 2 inch caliper and will be planted at intervals of 40 feet from each other. *These tiny plants at wide intervals will not provide any screening at all or take up any meaningful amount of water for years. *While they may eventually become useful to take up some water, even the matured willows will provide no effective screen in the fall and winter seasons. 2. As to "rosa multi -flora," the proposed bush, Four Seasons gardening center advises: "Rosa multi -flora is a five-foot high weed that the Extension Service would like to figure out how to get rid of. It tends to colonize and takes over wherever it is planted." Four Seasons could give no price because they do not sell it. They said: "Any farmer would be happy to supply it to anyone who would dig it out and probably would provide a truck to move it with as well." It would threaten immature cedar trees if planted close to them. As a redeeming feature, we are told that it flowers once a season and has a nice smell while the flowers last. 3. The dense planting of tiny trees in the right of way is not necessary, especially when compared to the need for additional plantings south of the property lines. 4. It is hard to tell what the planned treatment is for existing trees and shrubs along the common property or right of way lines, since they are not shown. None of these trees or shrubs should be removed or cut back. Petition to South Burlington Planning Commission - Page 1 5. The fence along the north edge of the new parking lot has been moved further north in the final plat as com- pared to the preliminary plat. At its present height, the fence will not prevent headlights from the new parking lot from shining into the second -floor windows (at least) of Had- ley Road residences. Bambino's generates a stream of traf- fic with lights on until 2:30 A.M. The portion of this traffic which directly affects Hadley Road properties will increase substantially with the parking lot; with the fence moved back, the lights will shine into the properties. We make the following requests: First Request: Please require the developer to replace the rosa multi -flora with a closely planted row of soil -appropriate evergreen trees, such as white pine. Second Request: Please require the developer to add at least two more rows of trees, mostly evergreens, south of the line of willows, at intervals of ten feet between trees. (We sug- gest that the right of way plantings be eliminated or thinned out to help offset the cost.) Third Request: Please require all new trees to be at least eight to ten feet in height when planted. Fourth Request: Please specifically require the developer not to remove or cut back any trees or shrubs along the common property line or right of way. Fifth Request: Please increase the height of the fence to twelve feet. SUBMITTED IN ANTICIPATION OF FINAL PLAT HEARING SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 22, 1993. J� pot 1 Petition to Sou Burlington an110 is on-5L a e /" I 190WA-- Petition to South Burlington Planning Commission - Page 3 Frank Kochman 75 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Joe Weith, City Planner June 22, 1993 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Proposed O'Dell Park Planned Commercial Development - *Recommendations of Neighbors' Consulting Architect *Additional Petition Signers Dear Joe: Several of the Hadley Road neighbors, including Jennifer and me, Louise Brooks, Candace Smith, Joe Parent, and Jane Quilliam recently consulted with Tom O'Brien of Northern Architects regard- ing the impact of the O'Dell Park PCD on Hadley Road residents. I enclose Mr. O'Brien's report, which is addressed to Chairman Burgess. In addition to the requests made in the broad petition filed last week (to the extent they are still relevant after the late changes you advised me about on Friday), I request that Mr. O'Brien's specific recommendations be adopted as conditions of any plat approval, namely: 1. For drainage purposes, in addition to constructing the new parking area north of Bambino's to slope back toward Bambino's, the grass apron north of the parking area should also be sloped towards Bambino's. The extent of this sloping apron should be 40 feet north of the edge of the paving or ten feet north of the fence, whichever is less. 2. Assuming a starting elevation (height relative to a fixed benchmark) of eight feet, the elevation of the stockade fence to be reinstalled in the grass north of the new north park- ing lot should rise at least one foot higher than the elevation of the existing fence for each 30 feet that the fence is moved northward from its existing location. This can be achieved through a reasonable combination of final grading and actual fence height. For example: - If the fence is reinstalled or a new fence is constructed 30 feet north of the existing fence location and the grade is unchanged, the new or reinstalled fence should be nine feet high. - If the ground is lowered one foot at that point, the fence itself must be at least ten feet high. - If the ground is raised at least one foot at that point, the fence could be as little as eight feet high. (Any ground elevation of one foot or more per thirty feet of northward movement would allow the use of the existing fencing.) 3. To soften some of the new noise at point (near its source), additional small be installed between the north edge of the Bambino's and the relocated fence. the most effective evergreen trees should parking lot north of 4. To divert some of the noise over the top of the neigh- borhood, an earth berm that elevates at least four to five feet above the finished grade of the parking lot should be constructed north of the parking lot. (This could be either in addition to or as a foundation for the new or reinstalled fence.) 5. Not less than three new rows of evergreens should be planted, extending at least fifty feet south from the PCD's com- mon property line with the Hadley Road residences. These evergreens should have a mature height of 35 to 50 feet, a start- ing height of not less than eight feet, and otherwise be spaced according to Mr. O'Brien's report. 6. Speed bumps should be installed in the main car travel lane running east -west from the northeast corner of the northeast parking lot to the northeast corner of the Ben Franklin building. Also enclosed is another copy of the neighbors' petition, containing eight more signatures, making a total of 29 residents (20 households) who have expressed their concern in writing. enclosures cc: (with Architect's report) Michael Flaherty, Chairman, South Charles Hafter, City Manager Bernard Barney Susan Bashaw, George and Leigh Bolender, Louise P. Brooks, Lucy T. Brown, I. Mildred Burleigh, Sarah and Ron Cadorette, Bruce and Diane Chattman, Janet V. Delneo, Milford and Dorothy Delorme, Billie and Glen Griggs, Jennifer Kochman Peter Kunin, Joseph A. Parent, William Pearson, Jane Quilliam, Hollace and Brian Reed, Jean and Albert Reid, Nancy Sherman, Candace L. Smith, Jake Tran, Sin erely,/ Fr nk ochman Burlington City Council 37 Hadley Road 73 Hadley Road 111 Hadley Road 33 Hadley Road 94 Hadley Road 50 Hadley Road 71 Hadley Road 34 Hadley Road 66 Hadley Road 99 Hadley Road 29 Hadley Road 75 Hadley Road 70 Hadley Road 67 Hadley Road 89 Hadley Road 37 Hadley Road 80 Hadley Road 28 Hadley Road 86 Hadley Road 69 Hadley Road 74 Hadley Road NORTHERN M_ 207 KING STREET - BURLINGTON IT ARCHITECTS June 21, 1993 South Burlington Planning Commision City Hall South Burlington, Vt 05403 Attn: William Burgess, Chairman Project: O'Dell Park PCD Subject: Concerns of the Residents of Hadley Road Dear Mr. Burgess, VERMONT 05401 - 802.658.1953 I have recently been asked by a group of Hadley Road residents to review the proposed O'Dell Park PCD and discuss issues on which they have concerns regarding the proposal. They sought my advice as an independent professional without past involvement with this issue so that they would have the opportunity to air their concerns to someone familiar with the design and public approval process and educate themselves regarding the reality of those concerns. I have met with them, visited the site and surrounding properties, and reviewed materials filed with the City. I understand the basis of the proposal before the Commision to be the construction of a new bank building, the realignment and improvement of the main interior site driveway (O'Dell Parkway), and the creation of new parking areas north and east of the existing Bambino's building. I further understand that this proposal has already received conditional preliminary approval from the Commision and that it has been revised and now stands before your body for final approval. As a result of my discussions with the residents, I believe they share a number of specific concerns regarding the Proposal. I present them to you that you be made aware of the opinions and concerns of your neighbors and that you account for their concerns when making your decision on this Proposal. It is possible that some of these issues have previously been discussed by the Commision. In these cases I apologize for bringing up what might appear to be "old" business but the depth of concern on the part of the residents makes it sensible to touch on them again so that they may better understand the Proposal and the background to your actions to date. Following is a list of these concerns together with my observations and thoughts regarding their application to this proposal. I. A. It appears that the only new building development is the new bank building. As the bank itself will likely only open during normal daytime hours, this component of the Proposal does not appear to me to be likely to cause the residents any disturbance. Had14 ad Resident Concerns O'Dell Park PCD page 2 B. The enlargement of the parking area east of Bambino's will increase the intensity of the vehicular activity in this area. It appears that 70 new spaces are being created in this area with provisions for 98 more in the future. 1. The presence of the existing cedar hedge along the south edge of the existing Twin Oaks Tennis Center's tennis courts together with the Twin Oaks building itself will likely shield those residents who live directly north of the Twin Oaks property (east end of Hadley Road). 2. For the residents of the western half of Hadley Road, particularly those on the south side of the street, I believe that this development as currently presented would produce a noticeable and measurable increase in noise and visual disturbances. C. The enlargement of the parking area due north of Bambino's will increase the intensity of the vehicular use of this area. Based upon the plans presented by the developer and my observations of the site, this area is currently able to provide parking for approximately 25 cars. The paving is fairly wide in this area now and I suspect that additional cars park there in a somewhat random arrangment during busy nights. The new plans call for extending the pavement approximately 40' further to the north to provide the additional space to increase the parking to 54 cars parked in a denser more space -efficient manner. 1. Please note that some versions of the plans denote this area as providing parking for 64 cars while only 54 are illustrated. 2. The Proposal will result in parking being located closer to the homes on Hadley Road than ever before. 3. Depending upon the final landscaping and grading of this area, the visual and acoustic effect on the residents in the adjoining properties could range from dramatically worse to better than the existing condition. (Please see Item IV below for a discussion of specific issues related to site development details) 4. Depending upon the final landscaping of this area, the acoustic effect on the residents in the Hadley Road area could range from worse to better than the existing condition. (Please see Item IV below for a discussion of specific issues related to site development details) II. Will approval of the Proposal result in additional noise being created by business activities at the O'Dell Park Complex? A. Noise generated by the businesses and activities of the Complex are of significant concern to the neighbors. The mixed -use nature of the site make it difficult to address this issue in a single response. In general I do not believe that the residents will experience any greater degree of acoustic disturbance from within the individual businesses as a result of this Proposal. With the exception of Bambino's, most of the businesses generate relatively small amounts of noise and operate only during the normal workday. Heard against the normal background noise of Shelburne Road, Hadley Road, the Twin Oaks Tennis Center and other normal daytime noise I expect the effect to be unnoticeable. Had14 ad Resident Concerns O'Dell Park PCD page 3 B. The presence of Bambino's (or any other nightclub -type business operating until well into the evening hours) presents a different condition. These types of businesses generally are closed during the early parts of the day and only begin to become active after the end of the normal workday. Whether using live bands or recorded music, they generally produce very high noise levels with a strong low frequency (bass) presence. The key requirements to controlling such noise are to have a building constructed to dampen and isolate such sound, to have a well - trained staff familiar with noise control techniques (such as leaving doors to the exterior of the building closed during operating hours to keep the noise inside), and to have an appropriately designed site. There is apparently a long history of noise issues going back to when the Club New England was occupying the current Bambino's building. The most recent action was apparently the requirement of the City of South Burlignton that Bambino's erect the 8' high wood stockade fence along the north edge of the parking area directly north of Bambino's. This requirement was made as a condition of the renewal of a liquor license to Bambino's due to the fact that over 200 complaints of noise and other disturbances had been received in the previous year. In this section I am not addressing the issue of noise isolation for sound created inside Bambino's but rather the changes in acoustics that the neighbors can expect as a result of this proposal. The creation of additional parking north and east of Bambino's will definitely increase the volume of traffic in this area of the site - especially at night. This increased traffic volume will definitely create more noise. The effect of this noise will be particularly noticeable because of the lack of other normal daytime background noise. The degree to which the volume and intensity of the noise creates a nuisance for those citizens living beyond the boundaries of the O'Dell Park property will be a function of the steps taken as part of the design of the Complex to mitigate this noise. C. I believe that the creation of any new or additional acoustic nuisance can be largely avoided if the proper site improvements are made as part of this Proposal. (Please see Item IV below for a discussion of specific issues related to site development details) A. The northern end of the O'Dell Park site is currently very wet. The residents informed me that it is generally wet all year round though extremely wet during the spring. There was a thick stand of trees along this boundary until 21/2 years ago when the Owners of the O'Dell complex cut down the trees. Remnants of this grove can still be seen north of the tennis courts at the Twin Oaks Center. Since the removal of these trees, several residents have experienced water problems on their properties ranging from flooded basements to unusable rear yards. There is also a healthy colony of mosquitoes that make several of the yards unusable. Based on my observations, this area is quite low and lacks a means of draining surface runoff. It is likely that the trees were helpful in mitigating this problem as they would have taken up large quantities of water from the ground. Hadle( )ad Resident Concerns O'Dell Park PCD page 4 B. As I understand the proposal from the developer, all the developed areas of the site are to be graded to drain into the storm water disposal system already in place on the site. I understand this system to carry the water to the South Bulington municipal system. Thus there should be no increase in the amount of storm water that runs off into the field north of the Bambino's, WVNY and Seaway Car Wash buildings. C. Based on my observations of the plans submitted by the developer, I suggest 1 minor modification to the grading of the new parking area north of Bambino's. In 4 addition to constructing the new parking area to slope back towards Bambino's, the V ++ grass apron north of the parking area should also be sloped to drain towards Bambino's. The extent of this sloping apron would be 40' north of the edge of paving or 10' north of the fence, whichever is less. Having this area slope towards Bambino's ensures that snow plowed over the north end of the parking area during the Winter will run off to the south when it melts in the Spring. IV. Will the landscaping and fencing included in this Proposal be effective in providing visual screening? A. I have noticed that a variety of landscaping plans have been submitted for this Project and I am aware that there has been concern on the part of some of the neighbors that the landscaping will be cheap and gratuitous. My opinion is that this concern stems from the events surrounding the original removal of the grove of trees 21/2 years ago. The agreement reached between the City and the Owner at that time appears to have been only marginally adhered to and has not produced any effective screening to date. B. As the events of 21/2 years ago are beyond my experience, I will concentrate my comments on the issues of the present and merely suggest to the Commision that they understand the depth of the concern the residents hold and insure that they receive appropriate guarantees from the current developers that the approved plans will be adhered to. C. Regarding the issue of visual screening, the residents are concerned about the general aesthetics of the site and the headlights shining into their homes late at night as the patrons of Bambino's come and go, generally until after 2:00 AM. With the exception of one resident whose bedroom view of the site is obstructed by a garage, all of the others I spoke with have experienced trouble sleeping and have been inconvenienced by headlights shining into their homes at these late hours. Several of the residents noted that the situation has improved somewhat since the fence was erected behind Bambino's last year. D. I have no doubt that the original grove of trees was the most effective screening possible. My observations of the remaining treed area indicates that very little direct light penetrates that area. For the homes where these trees were removed, the small trees planted by the Owner are completely ineffective as the headlights shine over them. Hadlef ad Resident Concerns O'Dell Park PCD page 5 E. My observations at the site indicate that the fence that currently exists at the north edge of the parking area behind Bambino's is the primary light shield for this problem. It is effective at blocking most headlights until the cars are south of the front wall of Bambino's. There are some gaps in coverage due to a small open space at the east end of the fence and due to variations in the heights of the fence and the elevations of the homes along Hadley Road but these are to be expected. All in all I think the fence functions well as a light shield for auto lights. I understand that the building lights on the current Bambino's building will be changed to shield their glare from the surrounding neighbors. F. Regarding the current O'Dell Park proposal, it appears that they are proposing to relocate the Bambino's fence when the parking lot is expanded. This is important both for the visual screening it provides as well as to comply with the City's liquor license requirement that it exist. However, I was not able to discern from the submittals two important components of the design of the relocated fence. 1. The fence should be basically solid like the existing fence. A picket fence with openings between the pickets will have little usefulness. 2. The elevation (height relative to some fixed benchmark) of the top of the fence is critical to the proper functioning of the fence. The actual height of the fence is of only secondary importance. For example, the ground north of the existing fence is generally level. Using simple surveying tools and several boards I was able to determine that a fence mounted 30 feet north of the existing fence would need to be 9 feet high in order to provide the same degree of visual screening for the homes on Hadley Road. However, if the ground in this area were to rise starting at the north edge of the existing pavement so that the elevation of the ground at that same point (30' north of the existing pavement) were 1 foot higher than currently exists, then the fence would only need to be 8 feet high. Conversely, if the ground were to be lowered 1 foot at that point the fence would need to be 10 feet high to provide the same shielding as the existing fence. Based upon these observations and subsequent checking I have done, I suggest that a fence (either the existing one or a new fence) be reinstalled in the grass north of the new expanded Bambino's north parking lot. The elevation of the top of this fence (relative to sea level or some other benchmark on the site) should increase by 1 foot for every 30 feet that the fence is moved north. The fence should also be extended past the east end of the WVNY building as shown on some of the plans to avoid having gaps in the shielding. G. Regarding the plantings along the north boundary of the O'Dell complex, I suggest that the developer be required to supplement those plantings at this time with better quality plant materials, preferably evergreen trees designed to achieve a mature height of 35'-40'. These new trees should be at least 8' tall when planted, 3 - 4 rows deep and extend at least 50 south of the property line. The spacing of these trees would need to be optimized for the species selected but I would suggest that no more than 20'-25' centers be used. Hadle( )ad Resident Concerns O'Dell Park PCD page 6 From a general viewpoint, with the removal of the grove of trees, the residents of Hadley Road now look out at a landscape consisting of several satellite dishes; the backs of the WVNY, Bambino's, and Ben Franklin buildings; a carwash; a television transmission tower and parking lots. If this were a completely new development, such a view would likely be cause for the inclusion of significant screening or other design efforts such as occurred on a recently approved commercial development project on Dorset Street. Also, installing these plantings at this time will minimize the developer's future expense by allowing small trees to be planted now, giving plenty of time for them to mature before the next round of development that may seek to develop the area along the north boundary. When that time comes, there will be an effective natural screen in place and the concerns and fears of the neighbors will be mitigated. V. Will the landscaping included in this Proposal be effective in providing acoustic screening? A. Regarding the issue of acoustic privacy for the residents of the Hadley Road area, I must emphasize that effective control of the noise at its source is the most cost effective and efficient means of avoiding a problem. B. The best means of avoiding the creation of an acoustic nuisance is to provide a large buffer area around the source of the noise. In the case of this Proposal, the distance between the Hadley Road residents and the O'Dell Park complex's parking area is decreasing and there are no actions currently planned to try to mitigate this condition. Thus it is likely that the residents will experience increased noise levels due to the proposed site modifications. C. The next best means of minimizing noise problems would be to block or deflect the noise away from the Hadley Road area. Deflecting the noise would require a solid barrier with resilient qualities. This could be an earth berm or some type of wall. Blocking the noise would require a barrier capable of absorbing the sound energy. Such a barrier could be created by either hard "constructed" surfaces or soft surfaces of plants. D. I suggest that evergreen trees be installed on the south side of the fence to help absorb some of the sound power near its source. An earth berm could also be constructed in this area to help deflect some of the sound over the top of the neighborhood. The berm could be 5'-6' in height and blend well with the sloped area between the south side of the tennis courts and the new east parking area. In reality there area number of approaches available that might involve combining many of these features in an efficient and cost effective manner. For example, placing the fence atop an earth berm constructed north of the new parking area north of Bambino's would allow the height of the fence to be lower than a fence at the same location without a berm (see Item IV.H above). E. One other suggestion I would make is the installation of speed bumps in the main car travel lane running east -west from the northeast corner of the ne east parking lot to the northeast corner of the Ben Franklin building. This road is over 500 feet long with no turns or stops and will likely be used by patrons of Bambino's as a shortcut to the exit at Shelburne Road, swinging north around Ben Franklin. Engine noise along this road will be an acoustic issue but safety concerns for other patrons leaving the building at night should also be a concern. Speed bumps would cause people to slow down and encourage them to use O'Dell Parkway. Hadley jad Resident Concerns O'Dell Park PCD page 7 Thank you for your consideration of this information. I hope I have been able to clarify some of the concerns of the Hadley Road residents and provide a basis for discussion. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of any assistance in this matter. Sincerely, 7-s-3,_ Thomas B. O'Brien, Partner City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 3, 1998 Ed Wolfstein Wolfstein Architecture 100 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Outdoor Terrace, 520 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Wolfstein: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer, William Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, April 10, 1998. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, /aymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls a FARRELL SITE PLAN n� EE` REDUGED FROM OR 1 G I NAL APR u i NOT TO SGALE City of So. Bur(ino' IDATACAD DRAWING NLl^.IBG2\GWA\9AI9 \SIR3.DCS © 1998 - ED W0.F'STEIN. AIA - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED LOW corewn.e rxa"lww DG.7Ni I.-S.ZE. 544,TeP4 a -CT COVERAGE 244515< < L -T GREEN 5PA<.e. L'UILDING AREA Bp02Ta <� - -ERCENTA&E LOT CWERAOE 1FT'NTABE LOT GREEN AREA: Nj—F BUILDING AREA. 5511 % T COVERAGE. 5 244315�< ' GREEN SPACE BDD2TA: a. ILNG AREA 3O,5191 m ""TA6E LOT COVERAGE . 4400 % SCENTA6 LOT GREEN AREA, '--ENTA6 BUILDING AREA: -11 % 5- % APED rtT�1A TLWa ' MONw-1 AT -{` CrtT 0 SWNI 9IgNGTpN F9(?'+ wA5 CSTLlED unp oE9Cr8TIDN5 mD - nn 51gyT r.ENpGYA�EpA,uBg 1lg u5 BE CWS[EQ n L[FGAI 1 .aaGOE5. -1 e5TIMATED L05T OP THE TERRACE WILL BE AFFROxIMATELY f I0000. 4 51ET OF AN ADDITIONAL. $ 500 ItiLL.L BE SPENT ON ADDITIONAL LANDSCMING 2HRUB5 < TREE51 THE EK 5T N6 L 6HTING FIXTURES ON THE I:X ST N6 GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER POLES THAT SURROUND THE MMEDIATE CHEER5 BUILDING W LL BE REPEALED AITH NEW LI6HTIN6 FIXTURES A5 DEPICTED IN THE ATTACHED CUT -SHEETS. THE HALL WASHING LIGHTS THAT SURROUND HE CHEERS BJI1DIN6 WILL HAVE A CUT-OFF —AIL CONSTRUCTED A5 B— IN DETAIL B. THE PARKING STRIPING 15 DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE PPRKINB AND LIRG/LATION CONFUSI11.. AND CAN BE MODIFIED IN THE FUTURE IF A. WHEN THE ODELL PARKWAY GOES THROUGH. -EE BER OF EXISTING SEATING AF—VED 4 '— THE CHEERS FACILITY. j PROPOSED CUT— BAFFLE AT ALL BUILDING FERlt-1QTIER LIGHT FIXTURE5. XISTING LIGHT FIXTURE DETAIL B 0.. 0 Z w Z v Q W J W CL m J o W w _ o V) to 0L U`) N to � N ❑ WOlfS%lri 100 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 USA (802)864-8334 1-800-487-9346 a.IC9tlINeT.nc. H,I�iwN NTN. KS EW 1 60' - 0" 4/09/98 RUUD LIGHTING A 15 H -s-N tla. W.. f�+ r - 2A'f7.l mmj - YOKE MOUNT auuenlvcFat6' 16" (406 mm) CUTOFF FLOODLIGHT SPEC. # WATTAGE CATALOG 4 (a) VOLTAGE (b) OPTIONS (Factory hislalled) 175w7 rAH CF4417 =i_" h1.12U•2091240r277V it=2-1-evel lighting p504 dov#f Ps, 250'J W CF4425 21 '"' T=120l277134711 Fus!n0 M 400trrAH CF4440- ai_ '"' _ 5.460V Q=OLL7rt2 Standby riyfr.Cea rt0lf 2501 HPS GF4525 ' _ ^^ 50D-220t240V 50 He numb rxrvl :" 1 k4y- 91a )re) 40047 HPS CF4540 ._ Ibl 8_220V 60 Hz -(a)P=Button PholoOrll -5P.EKtoroal PhotoC,011I%dnr,;y Svnfy (a) :'oltaoc. and (b) Optiom. Housing. Reflector- Soasrrtass, Pretinished semi-specular die cast aluminum diffuse alunMnu'm Finish color; txorze Ballast Capacitor Ignitort "66"mti (Wheee requ re(1) 2.06' `--- ~u / Cord. \ ' . — Lam 36" (914 mm s 1, Included f J lar.. }= _. _ -_ Lam(sholdar GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Sharp C-uloff ILuninaice for I iID lamp, totally enclosed, Housing, is seamless, die cast aluminum. Yoke mounting is a hinged steel brackc9, measuring 5" (127 min) wide by 2.5" (64 ntm) high, which allovvs Vertical tilt of fixture. Bracket allache5 to housing with Iwo 5116" (8 mn+18 stainless steel bolts. Bracket bolts are supplied with sealing washer to prevent water leakage. A 36' (914 mrn) flexible cord is provided for electrical connection. Lens assembly consists of rigid alurninum frame and high impact, clear tempered glass - ELECTRICAL: Fixture includes clear,-nIORLll base lamp: Porcelain enclosed, 4kv rated screw shell type lamp hrolder with spring loaded c(:nter contact. Ballast assernblios consist of high power factor Constant Wattage Autotransforiner ballast. Fully encapsulated lam() lf?nitOr included on HPS assembly. (Sec voltage options). 2-Level Lighting available for 250 & 40OW HPS. FINISH: FXCIUSiVC I )eltaG"ardr'1 finish features an F-coat epoxy primer with medium bronze acrylic powder topcoat, provicling excellent resistance to corrosion, ufiraviolel degrada- tion ar-Kl abrasion, The finish is Covcic'r) by our 7 year lirnited warranty. LABELS. ANSI lamp wattage label supplied, visible during relamping. UL Listed for wet locations alA enclosure classified IP54 per IEC 529: in Canada, CSA Certified or Canadian UL Listed for wet kwations- ACCESSORIES: FWG-1 fi = Wire Guard LS•16 = Polycarbonate Vandal Shield SBL•16 = Backlight5hield "llov, ; ��ol�c�GT NTH IN�C��jM+�'rIC>N 16" (406 mm) CUTOFF FLOODLIGHT APPLICATION DATA I I rrr . . 4 . Candlepower distribution curve of 40OW MH 16" (406 mm) Cutoff Floodlight at 20' vertical tilt. 1aa' i 150 120 i 20WO I Si 4 000 0 -a°—r ao Candlepower distribution curve of 4fK1W HPS 16" (406 mm) Cutoff Floodlight at 20, vertical tilt. 1.^0 a7 03 40 20 0 20 40 d0 80 10 40 (10 ao 40 1 l 0 '^ 1 J __ 20 0' Pal' 4C Isofoulcandle plot of 25OW MH Cutoff Isofoolcandle plot of 40OW ,MH Cutof Floodlight at 25' (7.6 m) mounting Floudli ;hl at 30' (9.1 m) mounlios height and 20' vertical trill. height, and 20" vertical tilt- 751100• 80 to 4V 20 0' 20 40' to So 1W 140, 120, YSp' 80 1� aU 2P 0' 20y 4n +).4�aaasia� -- Isofootcandle plot of 25OW HPS Cutoff Floodlight at 23' (7.6 m) mounting height and 2W vertical till. RUUD LIGHTING, INC. U.S. 9201 Washington Avonua Racine, Wisconsin 33406.3772 CANADA 57007iniberlea Blvd., Unit 3 Mississauga, Ontark) LAW 5R(J Nofootcandle plot of 40OW HPS Cutof FlootI ight at :36' (9A m) mounting height, and 2V vertical tilt. I'nnm+l +n 13.5 x.. PI ION1' (800)236-7000 FAX 0100)236-7.50O PHONE =0)A71-121-1 FAX (W0)236-73f)0 Wolfstein ARCH ITECTU Fie 100 Church Street Burlington Vermont USA 05401 . 4408 PROJECT NAME Cheeml Terrace PROJECT LOCATION 520 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont PROJECT NUMBER 9815 DATE APRIL 9,1998 SCALE A5 5HOWN REVISION / DATE DRAWING NUMBER 5K-2 Telephone 802.864.8334 Facsimile 802.864.8342 Toll Free 800.487.9346 E-mail ewolfste@together.net Memorandum - Planning April 28, 1998 agenda items April 24, 998 Page 3 Landscaping The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $300 which will be met. The revised final plat should include a planting schedule. Sewer: No additional sewer allocation needed. Traffic: No additional traffic is expected. Dumpsters: The existing dumpsters will be screened. The revised final plat should indicate the type of screening proposed. Lighting: The existing pole mounted floodlights are proposed to be replaced with a cutoff floodlight with a 20' vertical tilt. Staff recommends that they be at 0° vertical tilt or better yet, a more appropriate typical shoebox light fixture be used (i.e., not a floodlight). The existing floodlights mounted on the building which are currently visible and will be hidden. No additional lighting proposed. 4) UNIVERSITY MALL REALTY TRUST - SITE MODIFICATIONS - REVISED FINAL PLAT This application was continued from the 3/24/98 meeting (minutes enclosed) to give the applicant an opportunity to look at the access changes to the auto center with Sears. This project consists of amending an approval consisting of the following: 1) construct a 111,392 square foot GLA addition to the main University Mall building, 2) construct a 990 space multi -level parking structure, and 3) acquire a 1.7 acre adjoining parcel, raze a single family dwelling and construct a 15,469 square foot automotive center, University Mall, 155 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of: 1) construct a 111,504 square foot GLA addition to the main building, 2) construct a 983 space parking structure, 3) construct a 15,510 square foot automotive center, and 4) modifications to parking, circulation and landscaping. The last approval of this property was on 12/ 17/96. Access/circulation: Access modifications include: 1) revising the alignment and width of the new north entrance, and 2) closing the southerly access from the Hilson parking lot to the automotive 3 Memorandum - Planning April 28, 1998 agenda items April 24, 1998 Page 2 3) EDWARD WOLFSTEIN - OUTDOOR TERRACE - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of amending a previously approved three (3) building planned unit development consisting of a restaurant, an office building (television studio) and car wash. The amendment consists of adding a 1622 square foot outdoor terrace to the restaurant building with no additional seating. This property located at 520 Shelburne Road lies within the C 1 and C2 Districts. It is bounded on the north by residences, an indoor recreation facility, an auto repair facility and a motel, on the east by Farrell Street, on the south by undeveloped land and the 1-189 Mall, and on the west by Shelburne Road, a multi -family dwelling and an auto service station. Access/circulation: Access to the property is via a 40 foot curb cut on Shelburne Road for O'Dell Parkway (a private r.o.w.), Bacon Street (a 50 foot private r.o.w.), two (2) access drives to the Factory Outlet Mall and a 60 foot r.o.w. which is 520 feet long extending from Farrell Street to the project site. No changes proposed. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 5.7% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 44.9% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage information should be submitted with the revised final plat submittal. Setback requirements are met. Parkinm: No additional parking required. Applicant is proposing to stripe those spaces adjacent to the restaurant since these spaces are not striped. The area to be striped should be shown on the revised final plat. The plan shows parking spaces being added in the O'Dell Parkway r.o.w. on the south side of Ben Franklin and near the north east access to the T.J. Maxx property. If this is actually going to be done the applicant should submit a letter of support from all those property owners who have a legal interest in the r.o.w. If this is not going to happen, the plan should be revised to not show these new spaces. 2 ez-v 6/47 — 4x-ea /c-4,-j � o&�c— 1, Do � v' a /Igk Atx� r �It,-Tc c i� %) C�T�l A) �- Out,k rak-c"� spy/��� SIu�Q�ds PLANNING COMMISSION 28 April 1998 page 3 is claimed by the city. Mr. Truax of the Ben Franklin Store said it was their understanding that O'Dell Parkway is the last county road in the county. Mr. Dinklage said this should be looked into. Mr. Burgess asked how the applicant can say there will be no additional seating. Mr. Wolfstein said the disco side is closed during occupancy hours of the deck. There would be about 60 seats on the deck which would close at dusk. A resident of the neighborhood said that on a summer night he couldn't foresee an effective shutdown outside. He showed the location of his home and noted noise is a continuing problem every Thursday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday night. The applicant is in violation of the noise ordinance and does not appear to care. Mr. Wolfstein said they are willing to use the deck only at lunchtime and "happy hour," Noon-2, and 5-7. Mr. O'Rourke felt that if it is a nice night, people will take their glasses out and drink on the deck. Mr. Teeson said he would like to see curbing around the parking. He was very concerned about parking in the r.o.w. and wanted to be sure there is adequate parking on the site in case it becomes a legal street. He was also concerned with striping the parking as it could impede a right-of-way to rear parking for TJ Maxx. Mr. Burgess said the Commission will require everyone's approval before parking is striped. Mr. Dinklage didn't feel that would happen. Ms. Barone said she would like to see a tree barrier where the fence is. Mr. Dinklage said he would want a substantial sound barrier. Mr. O'Rourke agreed and wanted assurance that no one would be outside beyond the stated hours of operation. He also wanted to see some noise abatement begun. Mr. Teeson left the meeting at this point. 4. Continued Public Hearing: Final Plat application of University Mall Realty Trust to amend an approval consisting of: 1) con- struct a 111,392 sq. ft. GLA addition to the main University Mall building, 2) construct a 990 space multi -level parking structure, and 3) acquire a 1.7 acre adjoining parcel, raze a single family dwelling and construct a 15,469 sq. ft. automotive center, University Mall, 155 Dorset St. The amendment consists of PLANNING COMMISSION 28 April 1998 page 2 b. The final plat plan shall be revised to include the metes and bounds information for the r.o.w. serving either lot. 3. Any change to the final plat plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 4. The final plat plan shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to re- cordinq. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format, if possible. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the City Planner. Mr. Teeson seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Sketch Plan application of Edward Wolfstein to amend a previously approved three building planned unit development consisting of a restaurant, an office building (TV studio) and car wash. The amendment consists of adding a 1622 sq. ft. outdoor terrace to the restaurant building, 520 Shelburne Rd: Mr. Wolfstein showed the proposed location. The addition would be only for summer and fall months. Patrons would enter through the regular building entrance. Lighting around the perimeter of the building would be upgraded. There would be cut-off lighting around the front of the building. They will also submit a formal striping plan for the parking lot. Mr. Weith raised the issue of allowing parking spaces in the r.o.w. Mr. Wolfstein said that traffic rips through there and they felt this would slow it down. Mr. Dinklage asked if they would be jeopardizing the city's right to build a full street there in the future if parking is now allowed in the right of way. Mr. Weith said the right-of-way is private and was never dedicated to the city. Mr. Dinklage wanted to be sure nothing would jeopardize what could happen there in the future. He noted there will one day be development on the back piece. Mr. Wolfstein said there are already green areas in the r.o.w. Mr. Weith said he didn't feel striping the lot would slow traffic. The proper thing to do is to put in curbs, etc. Mr. Teeson asked if the applicant can meet parking requirements without striping. He said he shared Mr. Dinklage's concerns. If the Commission allows striping and the applicant doesn't meet parking elsewhere, the Commission could be creating a "hardship" for them. Mr. Dinklage suggested a letter of understanding from the applicant that this is a temporary use until the right-of-way City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658.7955 April 24, 1998 Ed Wolfstein Wolfstein Architecture 100 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Outdoor Terrace, 520 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Wolfstein: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, April 28, 1998 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. JW/mcp Encls City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 3, 1998 Ed Wolfstein Wolfstein Architecture 100 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Outdoor Terrace, 510 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Wolfstein: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the April 28, 1998 Planning Commission meeting minutes regarding the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. cerely, Joe eith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl C. There appears to be a discrepancy in several documents as to the boundaries of the Leased Premises. On Octo',er 4, 1957, Thomas A. Farrell leased prope^y measuring 200 feet i►] «idrh and 175 feet in depth to \11. Nlansfeld Television, Ir.c The lease is recorded in Book 34 at Page 369 of the South Burlin2tosi Land Records and is attached as Fxhibit A(6)(c) (The map referred to in the lease is missing from the Records.) In Thomas Farrell's Aarranty deed to .Farrell Corporation, dated November 8, 1961, as recorded in .Book 61, Page 92 of the band Records of the City of South Buriinctor,, Thomas A. Farrell conveyed a portion of his hropeny at tine Seaway Shoppinj; Censer to Farrell Corporation; which property was bounded �� estcrly by Shelburne Street, easterly by a line 500' distant from and parallel to Shelburne Street, southerly by a line 60' northerly of and parallel to the northerIv boundary of land 'heretofore conveyed to Seaway Shopping Center, and northerly by the southerly Iine of Bacon Street; EXCEPT (1) the parcel leased to Cities Service Oil Company (not relevant to this opinion), (2) the parcel conveyed to Herman and Mavis Thomas (not relevant to this opinion,), and (3) the "same land and prernises leased by the grantor to Mount \lansfield Television, Inc., by ,case dated October 4, 1957 and recorded in Volume 34, page 369 " Therefore, Thomas Farrell excepted a parcel of land 200 feet in width and 175 feet in depth from his above -referenced deed to the Farrell Corporation. The warranty deed from Mr. Farrell to Farrell Corporation is attached as Exhibit A(6)(c-1). Then, on June 30, 1980, Thomas A. Farrell leased the Leased Prenuses to International Television Corporation. The lease from 1%1r. Farrcll to International Television Corporation states in the property description that the Leased Premises are a rectangular parcel of land measuring 200' by 295'. The property description from the Thomas Farrell lease to International Television Corporation is attached as Exhibit A(6)(c-2). This property description in the lease to International Television Corporation must be s incorrect in light of the fact that Thomas Farrell onlyt T retained title �o the , �00 feet by 175 feet parcel %�hich he leased to Mt. Nfansfield Company, It appears that Mr. Farrell did net have legal title to � (_ the full 200' by 285' parcel he purported to lease to International Television. Corporation on June 3, i ? 80. At the time of the lease to International Television Corporation,, it appears that Farrell Corporation held legal title to that portion of the Leased Prer ises which measures 1 10 feet by 46,55 feet ( 500 feet easterly of Shelburne Street.) In fact, the map of the Property Plat of O'DeIl Parkway attached as Exhibit A(2)(a) indicates that if the leased property %-tier e 200 feet by 285 feet, the lines would extend southerly and intersect the "Bambinos" building as well as the "new bank building". I This problem could be rectified by the execution cf a new lease between the owners of the Leased Premises (Trustees of the Thomas A. Farrell Trust and Farrell Corporation) and US Broadcast Group, L,.P, as more particularly set forth in Section A(7)(b)(110 of this Memorandum. d. Mr. Farrell used a power of attorney in the deed from Thomas A. Farrell to Farrell Corporation, dated November 8, I961, as recorded in Book 61 at Page 92 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The acknowedement states that the deed is the frees - act and deed of the agent but neglects to state that the deed is the free act and deed of the principal, Thomas A Farrell, This does not appear to be a significant title defect and no remedial action appears necessary, 7 C C LAW OFFICES HEILMANN, EwAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. THE GIDEON KING HOUSE 35 KING STREET P. O. BOX 216 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0216 THOMAS F. HEILMANN CHRISTOPHER D. EKMAN MARY I. SIGLER ARTHUR SCOTT BARRETT, IR. TODD D. SCHLOSSBERG October 4, 1993 Mr. Raymond Belair Asst. City Planner 565 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: O'Dell Parkway - Farrell Planned Commercial Development Dear Ray: TELEPHONE (802) 864-4555 FAX # (802) 864-4659 I acknowledge receipt of the Notice of Condition form which you sent me at 4:00 Friday afternoon. I have adapted the form which you provided me with for the Farrell/O'Dell Park project. We would request that the Planning Commission approve the Plat which was delivered on September 8 as soon as possible. As you know, we have been endeavoring to obtain this Notice of Condition format for quite some time. After we received the form on Friday, we incorporated the specifics of this project and have recorded it. I would appreciate it if you would give me a call as soon as possible so that we can coordinate the recording of the Plat and finalization of this project. Thank you. Very truly yours, Thomas F. Heilmann TFH:lb LAW OFFICES HEILMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. P. 0. BOX 216 BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05402-0216 NOTICE OF A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF O'DELL PARR, A PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT DAVID FARRELL AND STUART McCONAUGHY, TRUSTEES, THOMAS FARRELL DONOR; FARRELL CORPORATION AND DAVID M. FARRELL WHEREAS, the South Burlington City Planning Commission (the "Commission") has approved certain properties of David Farrell and Stuart McConaughy, Trustees, Thomas Farrell, Donor; Farrell Corporation and David M. Farrell as a Planned Commercial Development (the "PCD") under the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of South Burlington; and WHEREAS, consistent with such approval, the aforementioned PCD is comprised of three parcels of land depicted on a property plan entitled "O'Dell Park, PCD," dated February 19, 1993, last revised April 1, 1993, prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Shelburne, Vermont and recorded in Plat Volume at Page of the City of South Burlington Land Records; and WHEREAS, for planning and zoning purposes, the PCD was reviewed and approved with conditions in the context of a single entity or parcel; and WHEREAS, in granting approval for the said PCD on June 29, 1993 land in the Findings of Fact and Decision of the South Burlington Planning Commission dated September 14, 1993, a condition was imposed by the Commission as follows: (a) a "Notice of Condition" shall be recorded in the land records which identifies this entire development as a planned commercial development (PCD) and which legally ties all of the lots in this development into one PCD for all planning, zoning and subdivision purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, to explain the rationale behind the Notice of Condition,nd provide actual notice in the City of South Burlington Land Records, the undersigned, in receipt of consideration of the approval of the Commission dated June 29, 1993 and in its findings of act and decision dated September 14, 1993 and other valuable consideration, hereby acknowledge and accept the following condition and covenant as binding upon and running with the lands comprising the PCD. 1. Any future application for an amendment or modification affecting one or more of the parcels comprising the PCD shall be deemed an amendment or modification to the PCD as a whole, and the Commission shall evaluate and render a decision in the context of the entire PCD, not merely on the impacts as they relate to the parcel(s) for which the amendment or modification is specifically proposed. 1 LAW OFFICES HEILMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. P. 0. BOX 21 6 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0216 2. Nothing in this Notice or the conditions or covenants contained herein or in the approval of the Planning Commission or the Findings of Fact and Decision of the Planning Commission shall be construed to prevent the conveyance, lease, assignment, mortgage or other transfer of any interest in and to any one of the above identified parcel separate and apart from another or the rest of the parcels comprising the PCD. Dated this � day of October, 1993 IN THE PRESENCE OF: n #62) Thomas F. Heilmann, Esq. Attorney -In -Fact and Duly Authorized Agent as to the Above Notice of Condition of Planned Commercial Development for David M. Farrell and Stuart H. McConaughy, Trustees, Thomas A. Farrell, Donor; Farrell Corporation; and David M. Farrell STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, ss. ``// _Z�� At Burlington, in said County and State, this ` day of October, 1993, personally appeared Thomas F. Heilmann, Attorney -in - Fact and Duly Authorized Agent for David M. Farrell and Stuart H. McConaughy, Trustees, Thomas A. Farrell, Donor; Farrell Corporation and David M. Farrell, and he acknowledges this instrument, by him signed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of David M. Farrell and Stuart H. McConaughy, Trustees, Thomas A. Farrell, Donor; Farrell Corporation and David M. Farrell. Before me Notary Public APPROVED IN FORM AND CONTENT: Dated: By: farc5-pcd.ntc 2 SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION Its Duly Authorized Agent CHARLOTTE PLANNING COMMISSION RE: JOHN J. DESCHENES' SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION Upon motion made, seconded and unanimously passed, it was RESOLVED, that- the three lot subdivision of John J. Deschenes, Greenbush Road, Charlotte, Vermont, which was initially approved by the Charlotte Planning Comnission on December 11, 1984, the plat thereof being recorded in the Land Records of the Town of Charlotte on January 28, 1986 at Map Volume 6, Page 48, is hereby RATIFIE10 and VALIDATED iri all respects subject to all requirements and conditions of the Resolution of the Charlotte Planning Commission, dated December 11, 1984. The sole and exclusive purpcse of the within resolution is to establish compliance with the provisions of 24 V.S.A. s4416. Dated this "2 7 day of November, 1990. CHARLOTTE ATTEST: a�mm�ssClerk, Char'P (, tfh4.bbb.7 NTeVG COMMISSION 1 ')9 a l;ec:a:vsd fnr roc ,r at b'cto�k �•"1 d��E !•.'.rt;�;'EC^ Ili `J:;l. � 12 uis EO •d 6�9bbO'Ce 'Ohl Xh3 XSS'1V' �Y�WN3 *!VW713H Eb:'i 3ni £6-9 - 300 SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION RE i O' DELL PARK, A PLAITNED COMMERCIA:. DEVELOPMENT DAVID M, FARRELL AND STUART MCCONAUCUY, TRUSTEES, THOMAS A. FARRELL, DONOR; FARRELL CORPORATION; AND DAVID M. FARRELLo APPLICANTS RESQLUTION Upon motion made, seconded and unanimously passed, it was RESOLVED, that the approval of the South Burlington Planning Commission of certain properties of David M. Farrell and Stuart McConaughr, Trustees, Thomas A. Farrell, Donor; Farrell Corporation and David M. Farrell as a Planned Commercial Development ("PCD") under the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of South Burlington which was initially approved by South Burlington Planning Commission on June 29, 1993, the plat thereof being recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records on , 1993 in Plat volume _ at Page is hereby RATIFIED and VALIDATED in all r.espeots, subject to all requirements and conditions of the resolution and approval of the South Burlington Planning Commission dated June 29, 1993. The sole and exclusive purpose of the within resolution is to establish Compliance with the provisions of 24 S.A. S4416. Dated this day of October, 1993. SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Clerk, South Burlington Planning Commission fw5.rc, 7n ',i P,( bWOGP?r'.P TIN VP4 1f1ggH IkJHLf`A NNHi�'� i - %h;?i. �(11. �.n-G -.I.^C (AW OWCkS Nr_iL�.IANN, FKMAN & AssOLi,ATES, INC. lHE CIDEON K;Nr, HOUSC 35 KING STRICT F O RO'; 215 FIlP.;.ir�r,rc�u, vF.R�,I)N'r 1)5:Ic72•c)?iC; TI+CNVAS F HOU NNN CHP..I5TONIV. D. IMON WO)", 1 3161:0. MPTHUR ;COTT QARTITr. IP.. rroo () SCHi.0;%(Ak October 5, 1993 VIA FACSIMILE Mr. Joseph Weith city planner 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: O'Dell Parkway - Farrell Planned Commercial Development Dear Joe: PAS w A'-2) 3G4-1.559 In furtherance of our discuss.lon this morning, I reviewed the Charlotte case that I had discussed with you. In that case, a three -lot subdivision was approved by the Planning Commission in 'December, 1984, however, the plan was not recorded in the land records until January of 1986. In that case, representing the purchaser of the property, I drafted a Resolution for consideration by the Charlotte Planning Commission at its next scheduled meeting after we discovered the problem. A copy of the Resolution, as submitted to the Planting Commission and as approved by it, is enclosed herewith. It is significant that in this situation Steve Stitzel represented the Town of Charlotte. Indeed, my letter to the Planning Commission is copied to Steve. The Charlotte Planning Commission did not require a new application nor did it require new plats to be submitted. I would request that the same approach be taken in this situation. I have drafted and enclosed a Resolution for the Farrell application that mirrors the one that was approved by the Charlotte Zoning Board. Very truly yours, Thomas F. Heilmann TFH:lb Enclosure: Resolutions (2) cc: Steven F. Stitzel, Esq. 6G9bb98'0e ON XV.j OOSSV N"W ] NNVWI 13H 7b : Z i Ki H-5 -i"DO I LAW OFFICES HEILMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. I HE GIDEON KING HOUSE 35 KING S IREET P. O. BOX 216 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05/102-0216 THOMAS F. HEILMANN CHRISTOPHER D. EKMAN MARY I. SIGLER ARTHUR SCOTT BARRETT, IR. TODD D.SCHLOSSBERG September 28, 1993 Mr. Raymond Belair Asst. City Planner 565 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: O'Dell Parkway - Farrell Planned Commercial Development Dear Ray: TELEPHONE (802) 864-4555 FAX x (802) 864-4659 As I trust you are aware, we have been endeavoring for quite some time to obtain the assistance of the City of South Burlington in connection with the so-called "Notice of Condition" set forth in the Planning Commission Minutes in reference to O'Dell Parkway. Specifically, I know that Jim Lamphere has discussed the situation with you on several occasions during August and September. I have also requested, orally and in writing, the above information from the City Attorney, Steven Stitzel. Enclosed is a copy of my letter facsimiled to Attorney Stitzel on September 14. To date, we have heard nothing from the City and we have not been furnished with any forms dealing with the so-called "Notice of Condition." On April 12, 1993 I delivered to you a letter specifying and acknowledging that, for purposes of the planned commercial development involved here, the official applicants are Farrell Corporation; David M. Farrell; and David M. Farrell and Stuart H. McConaughy, Trustees, U/T/A March 4, 1977, Thomas A. Farrell, Donor (copy enclosed). This April 12 document explicitly identifies all of the parcels that are involved as part of the planned commercial development for purposes of all permits that are issued. This April 12, 1993 document would seem to satisfactorily accomplish that which the Planning Commission set forth in its June 29 approval. Enclosed is a document entitled "Notice of Condition" which I have drafted and executed. I would request that you forthwith deliver this document to the land records with a copy to the Planning Commission and obtain the signature of the Clerk or Chairperson of the Planning Commission on the plat plans which are already in your possession. If there is any other form or further information that is needed to satisfy this requirement, please let me know as soon as possible and we will supplement that which you already have. Mr. Raymond Belair September 28, 1993 Page Two We do not want to see the time period for filing the plat plan go by on account of the situation of not being able to obtain from the City the so- called "Notice of Condition" that the Planning Commission has required. Very truly yours, Thomas F. Heilmann TFH:lb Enclosure: Notice Letters (2) NOTICE OF CONDITION OF PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the following described properties and parcels situated in the City of South Burlington are and shall hereafter be considered a Planned Commercial Development ("PCD") pursuant to the Planning, Zoning and Subdivision Rules, Regulations, Plans and Ordinances duly promulgated by the City of South Burlington. Further, said described parcels shall, for such purposes, be considered as a Planned Commercial Development pursuant to the City Plan and the Ordinances and Regulations of the City of South Burlington: A: The lands and premises of Farrell Corporation situated in the City of South Burlington which are referenced in an instrument recorded in Volume 61 at Page 92 of the City of South Burlington Records; B: The lands and premises of David M. Farrell and Stuart H. McConaughy, Trustees, U/T/A March 4, 1977, Thomas A. Farrell, Donor, pursuant to a deed recorded in Volume 322 at Pages 315-322 of the City of South Burlington Records; and C: The lands and premises of David M. Farrell as referenced in an instrument recorded in Volume 211 at Pages 14-15 of the City of South Burlington Records. This Notice of Condition is issued pursuant to and in conjunction with that certain application for approval of a planned commercial development made by and on behalf of the above property owners, to wit, Farrell Corporation; David M. Farrell; and David M. Farrell and Stuart H. McConaughy, Trustees, U/T/A March 4, 1977, Thomas A. Farrell, Donor concerning the above -referenced properties, which application was approved by the City of South Burlington Planning Commission in a motion of approval dated June 29, 1993. Dated at Burlington, Vermont this 28th day of September, 1993. Thomas F. Heilmann, Esq. Attorney -In -Fact and Duly Authorized Agent as to the Above Notice of Condition of Planned Commercial Development for Farrell Corporation; David M. Farrell; and David M. Farrell and Stuart H. McConaughy, Trustees, U/T/A March 4, 1977, Thomas A. Farrell, Donor LAW OFFICES HEILMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1'1IL GIDEON KING ROUSE 35 KING STREET P. O. BOX 216 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0216 1liOMAS f. HEII MANN CI IRISIOPI-II_R D. IIKMAN AR I"I It IR SCOI-I' GARRET E. IR. I ODD D- SO II.OSSBERC. September 14, 1993 VIA FACSIMILE Steven F. Stitzel, Esq. 171 Battery Street, 2nd Flr. Burlington, VT 05401 Re: O'Dell Parkway Dear Steve: 'I"H11 IONL (802) 864-4555 I AX # M02) 86AAG'i9 As I discussed with your office on Monday, September 13, on June 29, 1993 the Planning Commission approved our client's project. Paragraph 5 of the Planning Commission's Resolution (copy enclosed) talks about a "Notice of Condition" that needs to be recorded in the land records. Paragraph 12 also talks about the final plat plan being recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days of this approval. The City Planner does not seem to be able to give us any kind of guidance or format as to what this "Notice of Condition" is all about. I am writing to inquire as to whether there is a form of which you are aware which would help us draft the appropriate document. In the absence of a form, could you give me some advice as to who drafts the document. Should it be the City or the developer? Your assistance on this would be greatly appreciated. Since the Resolution was passed June 29, we need to have something signed by the Planning Commission and recorded prior to September 29. Thank you. Very truly yours, Thomas F. Heilmanri -b TFH:lb cc: Mr. James Lamphere DICTATED BUT NOT REVIEWED lAW OFFICES HEILMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1"I IE GIDEON KING HOUSE 35 KING STREET P. O. BOX 216 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0216 TI-IOMAS I'. 1 WILMANN CIIRISTOPHEK D. EKMAN MARY I. SIGI.ER ARI'IIUR SCOT-1' BARRETT, IR. IODD D. SCHLOSSBERG April 12, 1993 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION #658-4748 Mr. Raymond Belair Assistant City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION OF 'THOMAS FARRELL' Dear Ray: "TELEPHONE (802) 864-4555 FAX n (802) 864-4659 As we have discussed, the above application which is scheduled as No. 6 on the agenda for Tuesday, April 13, 1993, is a planned commercial development ("PCD") in the City of South Burlington. Although it has been referenced as such in the names of the owners set forth in the application, this letter will confirm that the official applicants are: (a) Farrell Corporation, (b) David M. Farrell and (c) David M. Farrell and Stuart H. McConaughy, Trustees, U/T/A March 4, 1977, Thomas A. Farrell, Donor. I would appreciate it if you would make sure that all of the further warnings in this matter, together with permits that are issued, make reference to the three property owners identified above. Thank you very much. Very truly yours, Thomas F. Heilmann TFH:lkm cc: James Lamphere (via facsimile) Dave Marshall (via facsimile) farrell City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 September 16, 1993 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project which was approved on June 22, 1993. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plans be recorded within 90 days of the date of approval. If you have any questions, please 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: David Marshall give me a call. S4nerelyJeith, City Planner v; State of `✓erniont WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED CASE NO. WW-4-0650 Environmental Protection Rules APPLICANT David Farrell Effective September 10, 1982 Stuart H. McConaughy, Trustees ADDRESS c/o Farrell Distributing Holmes Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 This project, consisting of constructing a new 2500 square foot building for use as a bank with 8 employees on the O'Dell Park located off Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL (1) This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106 or 658- 2199), the Vermont Department of Health (phone 863-7220), and local officials PRIOR to proceeding with this project. (2) The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Project No. 93108 Sheet C-1 "Property Plan" dated Feb 1993 revised 4/1/93; and Sheet C-3 "Overall Utility* Plan" dated April 1993 last revised 6/28/93 prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Division of Protection. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Division of Protection. (3) A copy of the approved plans and this Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local pe> r. Bonne .l_ . Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit S,.WW-4-0650, Farrell Rage 2 1 ( 4 ) In the event of a transfer of ownership ( partial or whole ) of this project, the transferee shall become permittee and be subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. (5) The Protection Division now reviews the sewage and water systems for public buildings under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 61 - Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit. WATER SUPPLY (6) The project is approved for water supply by construction and utilization of the municipal water service depicted on the approved plans. No other means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Division of Protection. SEWAGE DISPOSAL (7) The project is approved for connection to the South Burlington Bartlett Bay wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 120 gallons of sewage per day. Dated at Essex Jct., Vermont this 19th day of August, 1993. Jack Long, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By bb ` I-1 Ern st P. Chris anson Regional Engineer cc: For the Record City of South Burlington Water Supply Division Department of Labor and Industry Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 31, 1993 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the June 22, 1993 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. SIn M J Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: David Marshall PLANNING COMMISSION 22 JUNE 1993 page 2 and the "well lot" will be merged with one of the other lots. 54 Final Plat application of David Farrell & Stuart McConaughy, Trustees, Thomas Farrell, Donor; Farrell Corporation; and David Farrell, for a planned commercial development consisting of a new bank building with drive -through service, existing car wash, ex- isting office building, existing restaurant/bar building, and leased parking for the adjoining Ben Franklin business, Shelburne Road: Mr. Webster located the various properties on the lot. The bank will be relocated, and to do that O'Dell Parkway will be formal- ized as a city street. Abutters at the end of the street have agreed to an irrevocable offer of dedication if and when the city wants to open the road all the way through. There is a point of access so people heading south from the gas station can bet out at a signalized intersection. Mr. Webster then reviewed the curb cuts off O'dell Parkway. All parking at Bambino's will be formalized. The shared parking agreement with the Factory Outlet Mall expires in a few years and those spots will be rebuilt behind Bambino's in an area shown as "future % parking." The entire area will be relighted with cut-off fixtures so no light spills off the property. This will also be true of the building lighting on Bambino's. An existing 8 ft. stockade fence will be moved back. Willow trees will be planted in a wet area and a 3 ft. high berm will be created with a staggered row of white cedars on top of it. This is in addition to the existing cedar hedge which will be completed. A neighbor asked if the berm can be higher than 3 ft. as it will discourage 'trepassing and keep noise out of the res- idential neighborhood. Another resident asked about drainage and felt the ditch may need to be deeper so there can be run-off. Mr. LampherO said the area will be regraded to get to the pipe. Mr. Webster said the Ben Franklin people are still not happy with parking proposals and have suggested a modification which is not on the plan. Mr. Burgess said if the City Planner is not com- fortdble with the time he has had to review this change, the Com- mission will not act tonight. Mr. Webster then explained the changes. The proposal is to get as many spaces as conveniently located as possible on the west side of the store, so instead of perpendicular parking on the south side there will be two rows of 45 degree angled parking. This provides an additional 4 spaces. Mr. Craig said he was bothered that the island was removed and PLANNING COMMISSION 22 June 1993 page 3 it wasn't worth the injustice done to the plan for just a few parking spaces gained. Mr. Sheahan agreed. Mr. Austin sug- gested eliminating the first space on the south side of the parallel parking. Mr. Carroll suggested making the first space one large handicapped space. He noted that parallel parking is working well now. Mr. Craig noted a curbed island at the Shelburne Rd. access. Mr. Webster said that is to prevent a!left turn from the entrance into the gas station. Mrs. Reyes, who owns the property behind Citgo, was concerned with where traffic will exit so it doesn't come by her property. Mr. Sheahan said the Commission wants a nice buffer with land- scaping for the residential neighborhood. He felt that what has been put in is pretty worthless. He asked if the berm can be little higher and wider. Mr. Webster said it is quite high now and would have to be tremendously high to work accoustically. Mrs. Kochman said the area used to be treed but the trees were all cut down and the residents now have t,o look out on commer- cial property. She showed the Commission photos of the views from residences and also views from the commercial properties into the neighbors' homes. Mrs. Brooks added that the cedars that were on their land were taken over by Virginia Creeper from the Farrell property which the Farrells didn't do anything about. Mrs. Kochman said the neighbors want visual screening, proper drainage, and control of noise and lights from Bambino's. Mr. Webster said that drainage water will be put in a network of storm water systems which will capture water that used to drain to the north. Mr. Marshall showed current and proposed drainage. An opening will be left in the berm so drainage to the north can occur. He said water will not pond on the south side of the berm. Mr. O'Brien of Northern Architects said he has suggested berming closer to the parking lots to control the sound more. He said there are 4 main issues: enlargement and increased concentration of parking around Bambino's, drainage in the area of Bambino's and along Hadley Rd., density and the design of screening, and the fence behind Bambino's. Ms. Smith said she was told by Mr. Farrell that the area where trees were cut would become a green belt as a barrier between commercial and residential property. Mr. Burgess said he understood the concern for landscaping, views and noise abatement and the Commission would try to address those concerns. Mr. Sheahan said he would like a more detailed play. PLANNIN GCOMMISSION 22 June 1993 page 4 with the height of the berm and plantings in relation to residences. Mr. Craig said he would like to see some evergreens and other species. Mr. Teeson said he liked the traffic plan but felt the applicant had left out concern for the residences. He said they should be given the same attention that was given to other businesses. Mr. Webster said they would like to get approval at this meeting and then work out differences with staff. Members said they could not do that without seeing a specific landscaping and the final parking plans. Mr. Carroll asked that approval be given so work can be done in July and August. Members agreed to start the 29 June meeting at 7 PM and to limit discussion to the reconfigured parking and landscaping. He asked the City Planner to propose a landscaping scheme and if all else fails to consider this to be the landscaping proposal. Mr. Craig then moved to continue the hear in until 29 June. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimousl . 6. Site Planapplication lication of Ral h Goodrich fbr construction of a 26,000 sq. ft. buildinq for eneral office use, 625 Hinesbur Rd: Mr. Burgess stepped down during this Bearing due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Austin presided. Mr. Webster said the plan proposes to come to the furthest southern point for access to the site. There would be 21 parking spaces under the building (on grade, with the second floor above them). The land is zoned R-7 and a conditional use permit has been granted. Lot coverage would be 55%. All setbacks are met. The building would be 4 stories and 45 ft. high. Mr. Weith said they meet the additional setsback for that height. Mr. Webster said they are trying to keep as many mature trees as possible and will augment with new landscaping. r The main issue is what traffic overlay zone the property is in. It is a borderline situation. They,are 338 ft. from the intersection of the 2 centerlines (Hinesburg Rd./Kennedy Drive) to the end of the property line. There is the question of a curve which comes in on an angle. Mr. Weith said the issue is addressed in Article XVII and Sect. 22.105. Zone 1 would require a 300,ft. setback from the rear edge of intersecting pavement. There is only a 287 ft. setback for this property, so they don't meet the requirement. Mr. Craig noted the curb cut is on the lot line with no setback. There is also the question of an appropriate width of the driveway. 20 feet are proposed, but Mr. Craig felt, that it should be 30 ft. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 26, 1993 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the June 29, 1993 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval and the requirement that the final plat plans be recorded in the land records within 90 days of the approval. Should you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, floe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: David Marshall City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7955 ! 658-7958 July 12, 1993 David S. Marshall Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Re: Chittenden Bank, Sewer Allocation Dear Mr. Marshall: Please be advised that the South Burlington Planning Commission at their meeting held on June 29, 1993 allocated 120 gpd to David Farrell & Stuart McConaughy, Trustees, Thomas Farrell, Doner; Farrell Corporation; and David Farrell for construction of a 2,260 square foot bank with drive -through service, O'Dell Parkway. This building will be served by the City's Bartlett Bay Treatment facility which has sufficient capacity to handle this additional demand. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S erely, jtyf � � L� JeWeith Planner JW/peh J MOTION OF APPROVAL FARRELL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Final Plat application of David Farrell & Stuart ,McConaughy, Trustees, Thomas Farrell, Doner; Farrell Corporation; and David Farrell for a planned commercial development consisting of a new 2,260 square foot bank with drive -through service, existing car wash, existing office building, existing restaurant/bar building, and leased parking for the adjoining Ben Franklin business as depicted on an eleven (11) page set of plans, page one entitled "Property Plan, O'Dell Park PCD", prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. and dated 2/93, last revised 4/l/93 with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approvals and stipulations affecting the subject property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. All proposed and existing exterior site lighting shall be appropriately shielded or pointed so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in existing lighting or new lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 3. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit, the applicant shall post a landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value of proposed street trees and site landscaping. A $45,000 bond shall be posted for the site landscaping and a $9,400 bond for the street trees. The bonds shall remain if effect for three (3) years to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. 4. Legal documents for the proposed public street r.o.w. (i.e., irrevocable offer of dedication) and easements (e.g., drainage easement) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and shall be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to. issuance of zoning/building permit for the new bank building. 5. Prior to recording the final plat plans, a "Notice of Condition" shall be recorded in the land records which identifies this entire development as a planned commercial development (PCD) and which legally ties all the lots in this development into one PCD for all planning, zoning and subdivision purposes. 6. A bond for all improvements within the future street r.o.w. (i.e., street contruction, sidewalks, storm sewer, etc) shall be posted prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new street until such time as the street and r.o.w. is accepted and taken over by the City. 8. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 120 gpd for the new bank building. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 9. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit, the applicant shall contribute $4,416 to the Shelburne Road Intersection Improvement Fund based on the 172 additional peak hour trip ends estimated to be generated by this development. 10.In accordance with section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements within the future public street r.o.w. (ie, streets, water, sewer and storm drain lines, sidewalks, etc.), the developer shall submit to the City Engineer "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 11. The applicant shall be responsible for implementing the following improvements at the Shelburne Street/Home Avenue/Odell Parkway intersection: 1) retime the signal phasing, and 2) install a longer left -turn stacking lane for the southbound approach. The improvements shall be implemented in accordance with the recommendations contained in the traffic impact analysis submitted by the applicant and shall, be coordinated with the City of Burlington. The improvements shall be implemented prior to or within a reasonable time following occupancy of the building. 12. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. 13. The applicant shall obtain a certificate of occupancy permit from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the building. (mo-f) ti J I 'tee 2•y 1-4 1 C Q-o�� S , ell Jennifer Rochman 75 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Joe Weith, City Planner June 26, 1993 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: O'Dell Park Planned Commercial Development - *Wiemann-Lamphere Minutes of Neighbors' Meeting with Dennis Webster *Tom O'Brien's comments on revised plans submitted to you by the developer on Thursday, June 24. Dear Joe: Last Wednesday evening, a',representative group of the Hadley Road neighbors, including Louise Brooks, Candace Smith, Billie Griggs, Joe Parent, Jane Qu.illiam, Bill Pearson,'. arid, my husband and I met with Dennis Webster and Tom O'Brien, the architect who has been reviewing the plans for.the neighbors. I enclose Mr. Webster's typed minutes of -that meeting, which are generally accurate. We understand from Tom O'Brien that the developer then filed his revised plans with you on Thursday afternoon, and also made a copy of his newly filed plan available for Tom O'Brien's review. Before leaving town for the week -end, Tom O'Brien phoned in the result of his review. He also told Frank that he had given the same comments to Dennis Webster and that Dennis had indicated that the requested corrections would be made. Tom's comments fall into three general categories: 1. Plan features that conflict with the understandings ex- pressed in the minutes of the meeting. (Example: The minutes contemplate that the willow trees will be planted in an east -west line 40 feet south of the north property line. On Sheet C-2, there is no dimension given but the scale places the willows 25 feet south of the property line.) 2. Inconsistencies within the plans. (Example: On Sheet C-2, the three 12 foot red pines that are supposed to be planted within each 70 foot "module" are mislabelled in the planting schedule as "NWC" -- northern white cedar. Another example: Sheet C-2 shows the willows as 2" caliper, while sheet C-9 says 12" caliper. That would be nice, but we don't really expect trees a foot thick at this point.) 3. Silence or incomplete information on important issues. (Example: The plans say the berm will be "mulched," but is silent as to the type, depth, or extent of the mulch. We would be comfortable with a toe -to -toe and end -to -end 4" depth of shredded bark, as shown elsewhere in the plans for mulch in other locations, and would like to assume that's what they mean, but it should be stated.) I enclose Frank's complete notes of Tom O'Brien's report to him (which Tom can verify when he gets back on Monday). I think that Mr. Webster presented his plan to us in good faith and was very patient answering questions at our meeting, which we all appreciated. On the other hand, I think the time pressure tends to produce errors. Based on Tom's report, I think we are concerned about the potential for discrepancies between the details on the plans and the verbal understandings reached. Therefore, I would like to request that written conditions ac- curately expressing the understandings reached be incorporated as overriding conditions into any resolution approving the developer's final plat. ,j Please convey our deep thanks to the Commissioners for the concern they brought to these issues at last week's meeting. I Look forward to resolving the remaining details in a cooperative spirit by Tuesday night. (The main thing left unresolved is con- struction timing. Although we asked, Mr. Webster said he was not able either to commit to or estimate any schedule or hours for the work. We think the berm, the planting, the mulching with a specified, acceptable material, and the relocation of the fence, are an integral part of the site work and should be completely accomplished this summer.) S�erel , Kochman enclosures cc: (with Minutes of meeting with Webster and O'Brien report) Bernard Barney 37 Hadley Road Susan Bashaw, 73 Hadley Road George and Leigh Bolender, 111 Hadley Road Louise P. Brooks, 33 Hadley Road Lucy T. Brown, 94 Hadley Road I. Mildred Burleigh, 50 Hadley Road Sarah and Ron Cadorette, 71 Hadley Road Bruce and Diane Chattman, 34 Hadley Road Janet V. Delneo, 66 Hadley Road Milford and Dorothy Delorme, 99 Hadley Road Billie and Glen Griggs, 29 Hadley Road Jennifer Kochman 75 Hadley Road Peter Kunin, 70 Hadley Road Joseph A. Parent, 67 Hadley Road William Pearson, 89 Hadley Road Jane Quilliam, 37 Hadley Road Hollace and Brian Reed, 80 Hadley Road Jean and Albert Reid, 28 Hadley Road Nancy Sherman, 86 Hadley Road Candace L. Smith, 69 Hadley Road Jake Tran, 74 Hadley Road MEETING MINi7TFS O'DELL PARKWAY JUNE 23, 1993 PRESENT: Neighborhood representatives abutting North side of O'Dell park. Tom O'Brien -Architect for above. LOCATION: Home of Mr. & Mrs. Kochman * Berm to start 10' south of property line and vary in width and height. * Slopes of berm to be 1:2 * Height to vary from 4' to 5' * Total toe to toe berm width to vary from 16' to 22' `* Berm to extend entire length of north property line and across all but 12' of the north right of way. Except for a breach in the berm at the area of the storm sewer line which runs through the Hasltins property. * The area between north side of bean and north property line may require some swale creation espe`ially at the western most properties. * The berm to be. mulched. PLANTING: ' At 70' intervals on a line with each home..c� intersecting pro rty— line a 2" caliper willow will be planted � 0' soutl3 :e-norti property line. Centered on each willow 7 - 8' higli crock are to be planted at a diagonal spacing of 5' on center on_ the b�enm- which is 16' wide at that point. Between each willow 3 - 12' .zE7�nes will be planted on the berm which is to be 22' wide at Lhis area. These pines are to be planted 15' apart. Immediately south of these 3 pines 16 - 8' white cedars are to be planted on the berm at a diagonal spacing of 5' on center. The number is to be pro rated at east and . west end of the berm. The existing cedars will remain but may be temporarily trnsplanted to accomodate any Swale constriction at the west. Also some transplanting will occur in the 50' R.O.W. to accomodat.e the berm which turns slightly in a northerly direction to deflect surface water flowing from the easterly properti existing cedars wtIT�e,` treated with Lime at their base. - --- - ---- - --- _ - BAMBINO'S FENCE: Existing +/- 8' fence will be moved nonh and placed on an earth berm. The top of berm will be at elevation 219.S' and the top of fence will be at elevation 227.5'. This will leave approximately 6" bc-t veen the top of berm and bottom of fence. �i1.7�GJ JGJC r LQ Cl 1:'1I VIv Ln C 1 r . CONSTRUCTION NOTES: * Owner will put into and perpetually maintain in good working order the drainage pipe which runs from north of site into Hadley Road sewer system. Any a�ins work requued on Haskins property would be contingent on approval. * The building mounted lights on Bambino's will be replaced with "cut off" fixtures and this will be the first construction work. • Mr. Kochman needs an agreement on dust control measures, total length of exterior construction time and work hours of exterior construction; no work commencing before 8 a.m. 0 TOM O'BRIEN REVIEW OF REVISED O'DELL PLANS SUBMITTED TO SOUTH BUR- LINGTON PLANNING OFFICE ON JUNE 24 Sheet C-2 1. Should specifically indicate toe -to -toe berm dimensions (which are supposed to vary from 16-to 22 feet). 2. One more red pine should be included in Haskins module. (Only two are shown.) 3. Red Pines need to be correctly labelled as such. (Now says "NWC11 . ) 4. Show drainage pipe acrossl,iaskins. ,i 5. Change drain note to read: "Grade to drain to existing drain Pipe • 11 6. Note now says minimum space -of 12 feet between east end of berm and east limit of right of way." Strike the word "minimum." 7. State intention to create swale as necessary, and cross reference Sheet C-9. 8. Change existing note south of Redfield and Kochman properties to read as follows: "See Sheet C-9 for berm section and plan, additional plant- ings, and location of plantings." 9. In right of way, state "Plant Type D" for supplemental cedars. 10. State: "All existing cedars will be treated with lime at their base." Sheet C-9. 1. For berm, need detail as to type, thickness, and extent of mulch. [Example: shredded bark, 4 inch thickness, toe to toe, end to end.] 2. For willow dimensions, change 12" caliper to 2" caliper. 3. In "Section at Buffer" detail: A. Show 40 foot dimension from north property line to line of willows. B. State: "Swale as required with approval of adjacent landowner." 1 C. Add the following to "hemlock or cedars" label: "See Buffer Plan, above." 4. Add note to "Existing Cedars" to read as follows: "Where existing cedars conflict with proposed swale, remove and protect conflicting cedars, create swale, fertilize and re -plant removed cedars in same location as nearly as practicable." Sheet C-5 1. Add spot grade of 215.5 feet in northwest corner of parking lot adjacent to catch basin CB"17. 2. Note: CB-17 is not shown in same place as it is shown on Sheet C-3. Sheet C-3 1. Note: CB-17 is not shown in same place as it is shown on Sheet C-5. 2. Add specific work requirement: "Put drain in operating order." E City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 25, 1993 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June 29, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S'nc rel A. J Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp cc: David Marshall M E M O R A N D U M To: Chuck Hafter, City Manager From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: Proposed Chittenden Bank, Farrell Property, O'Dell Parkway Date: June 30, 1993 The Planning Commission approved the above referenced application at their meeting of 6/29/93. The project includes moving the stockade fence which is currently behind Bambino's approximately 65 - 70 feet to the north and placing the fence on a small berm (see attached plan). The fence will be down for a short period of time during construction of the berm and grading in the vicinity. The Commission wanted you to be aware of this proposal in case an amendment may be needed to the Liquor Control Board's approval for Bambino's. w ..TUM-22-93 T U E: 12:45 KNIGHT COti"LTG_ ENr_ P_ 01 Scott Johnstone OIRFCTOA OF PuaLiC WOARS Stevan Goodkind, P.E., CIty Enginoor 46NGINEEPING DIVISION I PUBLIC WORKS i Working together for aurangtor, Tune 21, 1993 Mr. Joseph Weith, City planner City of ,South Burlington Planning Department South�Bur13'ngton, 'Jermont 05 r .G3 Dear Mr. Weith: P.O. BOX 649 - BURLINGTON. VT 05402.0949 002) 663-9094 (T.O.O.) • (802) 86.1-0466 FAX Post-V cram fax transmittal memo 7671 a or pnQes . Co. Co. Dept. Phone A in the past few weeks I have been approached by Dr.Joseph O 1enlnnder `.0 review the impacts r -- propus•e:, Ch i ttenden Bank &:�velopnent to the adjoining Of Fom,e Ave. and Shelburne Rd. From h s study a"ic analysis of t":'._ he stat:t:S that this develop"::-nz would reauire in 1998, ab ,,,,ell eis a e'xiendingj the SO:;thbct;iC; C.`.'r t.l'til:i.p la;iL' SO aS to aCCOMOdate vehiCzilaV queing. As a representative oV the city o: !--lra i ngll.. x feel request that is reasonable and C. b a;�cuw;uc'ateci, modifications as the needs are pros=r'_c'.. If there are questions please feel free, to r.ctIt:�,c', ire. V�ry truly yours, Norman Ba win Traffic Division Head c . c . Scoter Johnstone, Director this is a by making any Further �— -. / r.4 1J. 1)'1 "Ov.: olu .)Ulu c:cxrc � oui CHITTENDEN COUNTY -METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION P.O. EQx 10R, 66 pezd ss rest EsmcJunCffon, YelmoM OS453 (802}658-3a04 April 23, 1993 Mr. Joseph Weith city Planner 575 Dorset Streeti S. Burlington, VT:05403 Post-V brand fax trjnsmKtal memo 7M a or pages 3. To �C f t rrom j 7- 15V r1 i1 ?V)r'o Dept phone Fax 0 I have reviewed the traffic impact analysis performed by TRANS/QP INC. for the revision and addition of the Chittenden Bank facilities located on Odell Parkway_ All assumptions and analysis procedures seem reasonable. Y,-,, concern was for tr r nr.^c7n of stopped vehicle at the new drive-in facility. The existing site plan provides for a maximum storage of six vehicles, while LCC::` it In to 'r1__F r:., avid Land Development" 1 pment" a facility with three drive-in windows should be designed for seven queued veLicles . A que-u-i ng study performed today at the Chittenden Bank on Dorset Street, shows a maximum queue of three vehicles which would seen to satisfy this concern. In conclusion, this development traffic causes no additional 1_nCrC _- C Cc CC:": mac. tion and dt iaY . The left-r-urn taper length on the north approach should be restripped to provide a full left -turn storage lame north to Bacon Street. The performance at this intersection would further be improved it it were progressed along with the rest of the Shelburne Road cozridor, since it was excluded from the initial study - If you have any questions, please call. sincerely, l'odd L. Landry Transportation Engineer Composed at .. . Burlington Cchehester Fssez Essex Junction Idatan Shemume 30, SUr!hnmon WI TMWn Whnoosld vefinorttAgency of Tmrkspor>-uen -TUN-22-93 TIDE. 1 c KNIGHT C0NSLT1:-. /_ ENG _ P _ @ 1 � � 1 Scott Johnstono 07RECTOA OF PUMIC WOAKS -, Stevan G000klnd, P.E., City Enpfn,o©r P.O. DOX 849 • BURLINGTON, VT 05402.0849 CNGINEMUG DIVISION ,�'�}, r (202) 863-9094 (T.a.D.) . (802) 869-0466 FAX L (0N�Con PUBLIC WORKS won;-ing rogethar for auribigton ,Tune 21, 19 9 3 Ego ,i-ft " t,rat d fax transmittal memo 7671 M or Froe./" / Mr. Joseph Weith, City Planner City of Sot„th purlirte ton 1,1anning Department: 57,5 . Dors.e.t .�tYzet South Burlingtcn, Vermont Dear Mr. 11eith: Dept. Phone A - ax a fcx fir/ 9'5 t 7 C, to the few weeks I have been approached by Dr.Joseph a, ��etZlnnder re view the impacts of .-he prcpuse,' Chittenden Bank development to the adjoining intersection of Home Ave. and Shelburne Rd. rron kiz.s stiady analysis of this intersection he status; thdC this devclopnirn-. Y!ould r=quire timing ri.-dificationn in 19D8, 1 J. a exk cnr .''na the southbounci left t0rntng late ,-,o as to acoomodate vehicular queing. � P.s a representacive o1` the city of Kura i,nat:on X feel this is a requc-st that is reasonable and can be arcomodated, by making modifications as the needs are presented. If there are any further questions p? ea_-e feel free to colt dcr me. V�ry truly yours, rr•!' : E, i Norman Fa :yin Traffic Divisicn 4ead c,c,Scott Johnstane, Director c 22 D i Zg2 low Frank Kochman 75 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 June 16, 1993 Joe Weith,"City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Hadley Road Residents' "Petition to South Burlington Plan- ning Commission Concerning Proposed O'Dell Park Planned Commer- cial Development." Dear Joe: In anticipation of the Planning Commission meeting of June 22, enclosed please find the captioned petition, signed by 20 residents of Hadley Road representing 15 separate residences. There may well be more signatures coming on separate copies of the same petition. I enclose extra copies to facilitate distribu- tion to the members of the Planning Commission. At the April 27 meeting, one of the members remarked that she was under the impression that the neighbors were somehow not in agreement about the appropriateness of the Farrells' plans. That is a misimpression, which this petition is intended to cor- rect. As you can see, there is overwhelming agreement that the landscaping and screening proposal is completely inadequate, and there is also overwhelming agreement as to the minimum changes necessary to address the common concerns. In addition, some of the neighbors have special concerns. For example, Mrs. Griggs at 29 Hadley seeks fencing that con- ceals all of the commercial buildings, especially the car wash, which became her backyard view when the woods were stripped away. Dr. Barney at 37 Hadley particularly wants to see an earth berm as part of the screening. Jennifer and I are specially concerned that the proposed (and largely beside the point) plantings in the right of way will block the only physical access we have to our backyard for emergency and service vehicles. (We have a legal right to the access and the house was built the way it is in obvious contemplation of that right.) We hope that the petition will serve to convey how strongly the neighbors feel about the inadequacy of the final plat. PETITION TO SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CONCERNING PROPOSED O'DELL PARK PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT We, residents of Hadley Road, have examined the fencing and landscaping plans for the O'Dell Park Planned Commercial Develop- ment as shown on Sheet C-2 of the final plat submission. We note that th6'minutes of the 12/8/92 Planning Commission Meeting say "Members emphasized that they will ask for sufficient landscaping and screening for neighbors in the residential area." We thank the Planning Commission for expressing that inten- tion. We think the new landscaping to the south of the Hadley Road property lines is not deep enough, dense enough, or other- wise adequate to provide effective and aesthetically acceptable screening, and that the moved -back fence is not high enough. In particular: 1. The plat says that the willows will each be 2 inch caliper and will be planted at intervals of 40 feet from each other. *These tiny plants at wide intervals will not provide any screening at all or take up any meaningful amount of water for years. *While they may eventually become useful to take up some water, even the matured willows will provide no effective screen in the fall and winter seasons. 2. As to "rosa multi -flora," the proposed bush, Four Seasons gardening center advises: "Rosa multi -flora is a five-foot high weed that the Extension Service would like to figure out how to get rid of. It tends to colonize and takes over wherever it is planted." Four Seasons could give no price because they do not sell it. They said: "Any farmer would be'happy to supply it to anyone who would dig it out and probably would provide a truck to move it with as well." It would threaten immature cedar trees if planted close to them. As a redeeming feature, we are told that it flowers once a season and has a nice smell while the flowers last. 3. The dense planting of tiny trees in the right of way is not necessary, especially when compared to the need for additional plantings south of the property lines. 4. It is hard to tell what the planned treatment is for existing trees and shrubs along the common property or right of way lines, since they are not shown. None of these trees or shrubs should be removed or cut back. Petition to South Burlington Planning Commission - Page 1 5. The fence along the north edge of the new parking lot has been moved further north in the final plat as com- pared to the preliminary plat. At its present height, the fence will not prevent headlights from the new parking lot from shining into the second -floor windows (at least) of Had- ley Road residences. Bambino's generates a stream of traf- fic with lights on until 2:30 A.M. The portion of this traffic which directly affects Hadley Road properties will increase substantially with the parking lot; with the fence moved back, the lights will shine into the properties. We make the following requests: First Request: Please require the developer to replace the rosa multi -flora with a closely planted row of soil -appropriate evergreen trees, such as white pine. Second Request: Please require the developer to add at least two more rows of trees, mostly evergreens, south of the line of willows, at intervals of ten feet between trees. (We sug- gest that the right of way plantings be eliminated or thinned out to help offset the cost.) Third Request: Please require all new trees to be• at least eight to ten feet in height when planted. Fourth Request: Please specifically require the developer not to remove or cut back any trees or shrubs along the common property line or right of way. Fifth Request: Please increase the height of the fence to twelve feet. SUBMITTED IN ANTICIPATION OF FINAL PLAT HEARING SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 22, 1993. Jtu�w+5 pot V 1 CDC C. Petition to South Burlington �g Co iss on a e a-U —Q ft'd r Petition to South Burlington Planning Commission - Page 3 Frank Kochman 75 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Joe Weith, City Planner June 22, 1993 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Proposed O'Dell Park Planned Commercial Development - *Recommendations of Neighbors' Consulting Architect *Additional Petition Signers Dear Joe: Several of the Hadley Road neighbors, including Jennifer and me, Louise Brooks, Candace Smith, Joe Parent, and Jane Quilliam recently consulted with Tom O'Brien of Northern Architects regard- ing the impact of the O'Dell Park PCD on Hadley Road residents. I enclose Mr. O'Brien's report, which is addressed to Chairman Burgess. In addition to the requests made in the broad petition filed last week (to the extent they are still relevant after the late changes you advised me about on Friday), I request that Mr. O'Brien's specific recommendations be adopted as conditions of any plat approval, namely: 1. For drainage purposes, in addition to constructing the new parking area north of Bambino's to slope back toward Bambino's, the grass apron north of the parking area should also be sloped towards Bambino's. The extent of this sloping apron should be 40 feet north of the edge of the paving or ten feet north of the fence, whichever is less. 2. Assuming a starting elevation (height relative to a fixed benchmark) of eight feet, the elevation of the stockade fence to be reinstalled in the grass north of the new north park- ing lot should rise at least one foot higher than the elevation of the existing fence for each 30 feet that the fence is moved northward from its existing location. This can be achieved through a reasonable combination of final grading and actual fence height. For example: - If the fence is reinstalled or a new fence is constructed 30 feet north of the existing fence location and the grade is unchanged, the new or reinstalled fence should be nine feet high. - If the ground is lowered one foot at that point, the fence itself must be at least ten feet high. - If the ground is raised at least one foot at that point, the fence could be as little as eight feet high. (Any ground elevation of one foot or more per thirty feet of northward movement would allow the use of the existing fencing.) 3. To soften some of the new noise at point (near its source), additional small be installed between the north edge of the Bambino's and the relocated fence. the most effective evergreen trees should parking lot north of 4. To divert some of the noise over the top of the neigh- borhood, an earth berm that elevates at least four to five feet above the finished grade of the parking lot should be constructed north of the parking lot. (This could be either in addition to or as a foundation for the new or reinstalled fence.) 5. Not less than three new rows of evergreens should be planted, extending at least fifty feet south from the PCD's com- mon property line with the Hadley Road residences. These evergreens should have a mature height of 35 to 50 feet, a start- ing height of not less than eight feet, and otherwise be spaced according to Mr. O'Brien's report. 6. Speed bumps should be installed in the main car travel lane running east -west from the northeast corner of the northeast parking lot to the northeast corner of the Ben Franklin building. Also enclosed is another copy of the neighbors' petition, containing eight more signatures, making a total of 29 residents (20 households) who have expressed their concern in writing. enclosures cc: (with Architect's report) Michael Flaherty, Chairman, South Charles Hafter, City Manager Bernard Barney Susan Bashaw, George and Leigh Bolender, Louise P. Brooks, Lucy T. Brown, I. Mildred Burleigh, Sarah and Ron Cadorette, Bruce and Diane Chattman, Janet V. Delneo, Milford and Dorothy Delorme, Billie and Glen Griggs, Jennifer Kochman Peter Kunin, Joseph A. Parent, William Pearson, Jane Quilliam, Hollace and Brian Reed, Jean and Albert Reid, Nancy Sherman, Candace L. Smith, Jake Tran, Sin erely, Fr nk ochman Burlington City Council 37 Hadley Road 73 Hadley Road 111 Hadley Road 33 Hadley Road 94 Hadley Road 50 Hadley Road 71 Hadley Road 34 Hadley Road 66 Hadley Road 99 Hadley Road 29 Hadley Road 75 Hadley Road 70 Hadley Road 67 Hadley Road 89 Hadley Road 37 Hadley Road 80 Hadley Road 28 Hadley Road 86 Hadley Road 69 Hadley Road 74 Hadley Road .. .._ -•}' � I .per. vt n;;a •ge>coUiy i j,3W ,.}tt2!?.1/ . �-. NORTHERN �� 207 KING STREET • BURLINGTON iilTrri ARCHITECTS June 21, 1993 South Burlington Planning Commision City Hall South Burlington, Vt 05403 Attn: William Burgess, Chairman Project: O'Dell Park PCD Subject: Concerns of the Residents of Hadley Road Dear Mr. Burgess, VERMONT 05401 • 802.658.1953 I have recently been asked by a group of Hadley Road residents to review the proposed O'Dell Park PCD and discuss issues on which they have concerns regarding the proposal. They sought my advice as an independent professional without past involvement with this issue so that they would have the opportunity to air their concerns to someone familiar with the design and public approval process and educate themselves regarding the reality of those concerns. I have met with them, visited the site and surrounding properties, and reviewed materials filed with the City. I understand the basis of the proposal before the Commision to be the construction of a new bank building, the realignment and improvement of the main interior site driveway (O'Dell Parkway), and the creation of new parking areas north and east of the existing Bambino's building. I further understand that this proposal has already received conditional preliminary approval from the Commision and that it has been revised and now stands before your body for final approval. As a result of my discussions with the residents, I believe they share a number of specific concerns regarding the Proposal. I present them to you that you be made aware of the opinions and concerns of your neighbors and that you account for their concerns when making your decision on this Proposal. It is possible that some of these issues have previously been discussed by the Commision. In these cases I apologize for bringing up what might appear to be "old" business but the depth of concern on the part of the residents makes it sensible to touch on them again so that they may better understand the Proposal and the background to your actions to date. Following is a list of these concerns together with my observations and thoughts regarding their application to this proposal. I. Will approval of the Proposal result in increased vehicular traffic in the O'Dell Park Complex that will venerate visual and accoustic disturbances for the adjoining landowners and the other residents of the Hadley Road area? A. It appears that the only new building development is the new bank building. As the bank itself will likely only open during normal daytime hours, this component of the Proposal does not appear to me to be likely to cause the residents any disturbance. JL'��'.��., .. .. a�.�-. .... ,:VUVNtivv .t... „♦ ��.�(Y.arsi..c�rs'.ai.w?�vCK'.:'O. �...:.. ��...,. .. .. ..�..a.. �:v5_?: �'�.�KSi� _ _ a'='%'�=�:.�.�.,snw__. rtadley Road Resident Concerns O'Dell Park PCD page 2 B. The enlargement of the parking area east of Bambino's will increase the intensity of the vehicular activity in this area. It appears that 70 new spaces are being created in this area with provisions for 98 more in the future. 1. The presence of the existing cedar hedge along the south edge of the existing Twin Oaks Tennis Center's tennis courts together with the Twin Oaks building itself will likely shield those residents who live directly north of the Twin Oaks property (east end of Hadley Road). 2. For the residents of the western half of Hadley Road, particularly those on the south side of the street, I believe that this development as currently presented would produce a noticeable and measurable increase in noise and visual disturbances. C. The enlargement of the parking area due north of Bambino's will increase the intensity of the vehicular use of this area. Based upon the plans presented by the developer and my observations of the site, this area is currently able to provide parking for approximately 2S cars. The paving is fairly wide in this area now and I suspect that additional cars park there in a somewhat random arrangment during busy nights. The new plans call for extending the pavement approximately 40' further to the north to provide the additional space to increase the parking to S4 cars parked in a denser more space -efficient manner. 1. Please note that some versions of the plans denote this area as providing parking for 64 cars while only 54 are illustrated. 2. The Proposal will result in parking being located closer to the homes on Hadley Road than ever before. 3. Depending upon the final landscaping and grading of this area, the visual and acoustic effect on the residents in the adjoining properties could range from dramatically worse to better than the existing condition. (Please see Item IV below for a discussion of specific issues related to site development details) 4. Depending upon the final landscaping of this area, the acoustic effect on the residents in the Hadley Road area could range from worse to better than the existing condition. (Please see Item IV below for a discussion of specific issues related to site development details) II. Will approval of the Proposal result in additional noise being created by business activities at the O'Dell Park Complex? A. Noise generated by the businesses and activities of the Complex are of significant concern to the neighbors. The mixed -use nature of the site make it difficult to address this issue in a single response. In general I do not believe that the residents will experience any greater degree of acoustic disturbance from within the individual businesses as a result of this Proposal. With the exception of Bambino's, most of the businesses generate relatively small amounts of noise and operate only during the normal workday. Heard against the normal background noise of Shelburne Road, Hadley Road, the Twin Oaks Tennis Center and other normal daytime noise I expect the effect to be unnoticeable. Hadley Road Resident Concerns O'Dell Park PCD page 3 B . The presence of Bambino's (or any other nightclub -type business operating until well into the evening hours) presents a different condition. These types of businesses generally are closed during the early parts of the day and only begin to become active after the end of the normal workday. Whether using live bands or recorded music, they generally produce very high noise levels with a strong low frequency (bass) presence. The key requirements to controlling such noise are to have a building constructed to dampen and isolate such sound, to have a well - trained staff familiar with noise control techniques (such as leaving doors to the exterior of the building closed during operating hours to keep the noise inside), and to have an appropriately designed site. There is apparently a long history of noise issues going back to when the Club New England was occupying the current Bambino's building. The most recent action was apparently the requirement of the City of South Burlignton that Bambino's erect the 8' high wood stockade fence along the north edge of the parking area directly north of Bambino's. This requirement was made as a condition of the renewal of a liquor license to Bambino's due to the fact that over 200 complaints of noise and other disturbances had been received in the previous year. In this section I am not addressing the issue of noise isolation for sound created inside Bambino's but rather the changes in acoustics that the neighbors can expect as a result of this proposal. The creation of additional parking north and east of Bambino's will definitely increase the volume of traffic in this area of the site - especially at night. This increased traffic volume will definitely.create more noise. The effect of this noise will be particularly noticeable because of the lack of other normal daytime background noise. The degree to which the volume and intensity of the noise creates a nuisance for those citizens living beyond the boundaries of the O'Dell Park property will be a function of the steps taken as part of the design of the Complex to mitigate this noise. C. I believe that the creation of any new or additional acoustic nuisance can be largely avoided if the proper site improvements are made as part of this Proposal. (Please see Item IV below for a discussion of specific issues related to site development details) III. Will the proposal exacerbate drainage problems existing along the northern boundar off the site adjacent to the Hadley Road properties? I A. The northern end of the O'Dell Park site is currently very wet. The residents informed me that it is generally wet all year round though Extremely wet during the spring. There was a thick stand of trees along this boundary until 21/2 years ago when the Owners of the O'Dell complex cut down the trees. Remnants of this grove can still be seen north of the tennis courts at the Twin Oaks Center. Since the removal of these trees, several residents have experienced water problems on their properties ranging from flooded basements to unusable rear yards. There is also a healthy colony of mosquitoes that make several of the yards unusable. Based on my observations, this area is quite low and lacks a means of draining surface runoff. It is likely that the trees were helpful in mitigating this problem as they would have taken up large quantities of water from the ground. dley Road Resident Concerns O'Dell Park PCD page 4 B . As I understand the proposal from the developer, all the developed areas of the site are to be graded to drain into the storm water disposal system already in place on the site. I understand this system to carry the water to the South Bulington municipal system. Thus there should be no increase in the amount of storm water that runs off into the field north of the Bambino's, WVNY and Seaway Car Wash buildings. C. Based on my observations of the plans submitted by the developer, I suggest 1 minor modification to the grading of the new parking area north of Bambino's. In addition to constructing the new parking area to slope back towards Bambino's, the grass apron north of the parking area should also be sloped to drain towards Bambino's. The extent of this sloping apron would be 40' north of the edge of paving or 10' north of the fence, whichever is less. Having this area slope towards Bambino's ensures that snow plowed over the north end of the parking area during the Winter will run off to the south when it melts in the Spring. IV. Will the landscapine and fencing included in this Proposal be effective in providing visual screening? A. I have noticed that a variety of landscaping plans have been submitted for this Project and I am aware that there has been concern on the part of some of the neighbors that the landscaping will be cheap and gratuitous. My opinion is that this concern stems from the events surrounding the original removal of the grove of trees 21/2 years ago. The agreement reached between the City and the Owner at that time appears to have been only marginally adhered to and has not produced any effective screening to date. B. As the events of 21/2 years ago are beyond my experience, I will concentrate my comments on the issues of the present and merely suggest to the Commision that they understand the depth of the concern the residents hold and insure that they receive appropriate guarantees from the current developers that the approved plans will be adhered to. C. Regarding the issue of visual screening, the residents are concerned about the general aesthetics of the site and the headlights shining into their homes late at night as the patrons of Bambino's come and go, generally until after 2:00 AM. With the exception of one resident whose bedroom view of the site is obstructed by a garage, all of the others I spoke with have experienced trouble sleeping and have been inconvenienced by headlights shining into their homes at these late hours. Several of the residents noted that the situation has improved somewhat since the fence was erected behind Bambino's last year. D. I have no doubt that the original grove of trees was the most effective ° screening possible. My observations of the remaining treed area indicates that very little direct light penetrates that area. For the homes where these trees were removed, the small trees planted by the Owner are completely ineffective as the headlights shine over them. Hadley Road Resident Concerns O'Dell Park PCD page 5 E. My observations at the site indicate that the fence that currently exists at the north edge of the parking area behind Bambino's is the primary light shield for this problem. It is effective at blocking most headlights until the cars are south of the front wall of Bambino's. There are some gaps in coverage due to a small open space at the east end of the fence and due to variations in the heights of the fence and the elevations of the homes along Hadley Road but these are to be expected. All in all I think the fence functions well as a light shield for auto lights. I understand that the building lights on the current Bambino's building will be changed to shield their glare from the surrounding neighbors. F. Regarding the current O'Dell Park proposal, it appears that they are proposing to relocate the Bambino's fence when the parking lot is expanded. This is important both for the visual screening it provides as well as to comply with the City's liquor license requirement that it exist. However, I was not able to discern from the submittals two important components of the design of the relocated fence. 1. The fence should be basically solid like the existing fence. A picket fence with openings between the pickets will have little usefulness. 2. The elevation (height relative to some fixed benchmark) of the top of the fence is critical to the proper functioning of the fence. The actual height of the fence is of only secondary importance. For example, the ground north of the existing fence is generally level. Using simple surveying tools and several boards I was able to determine that a fence mounted 30 feet north of the existing fence would need to be 9 feet high in order to provide the same degree of visual screening for the homes on Hadley Road. However, if the ground in this area were to rise starting at the north edge of the existing pavement so that the elevation of the ground at that same point (30' north of the existing pavement) were 1 foot higher than currently exists, then the fence would only need to be 8 feet high. Conversely, if the ground were to be lowered 1 foot at that point the fence would need to be 10 feet high to provide the same shielding as the existing fence. Based upon these observations and subsequent checking I have done, I suggest that a fence (either the existing one or a new fence) be reinstalled in the grass north of the new expanded Bambino's north parking lot. The elevation of the top of this fence (relative to sea level or some other benchmark on the site) should increase by 1 foot for every 30 feet that the fence is moved north. The fence should also be extended past the east end of the WVNY building as shown on some of the plans to avoid having gaps in the shielding. G. Regarding the plantings along the north boundary of the O'Dell complex, I suggest that the developer be required to supplement those plantings at this time with better quality plant materials, preferably evergreen trees designed to achieve a mature height of 35'-40'. These new trees should be at least 8' tall when planted, 3 - 4 rows deep and extend at least 50 south of the property line. The spacing of these trees would need to be optimized for the species selected but I would suggest that no more than 20'-25' centers be used. j dley Road Resident Concerns O'Dell Park PCD page 6 From a general viewpoint, with the removal of the grove of trees, the residents of Hadley Road now look out at a landscape consisting of several satellite dishes; the backs of the WVNY, Bambino's, and Ben Franklin buildings; a carwash; a television transmission tower and parking lots. If this were a completely new development, such a view would likely be cause for the inclusion of significant screening or other design efforts such as occurred on a recently approved commercial development project on Dorset Street. Also, installing these plantings at this time will minimize the developer's future expense by allowing small trees to be planted now, giving plenty of time for them to mature before the next round of development that may seek to develop the area along the north boundary. When that time comes, there will be an effective natural screen in place and the concerns and fears of the neighbors will be mitigated. V. Will the landscaping_ included in this Proposal be effective in providing acoustic screening? A. Regarding the issue of acoustic privacy for the residents of the Hadley Road area, I'`' must emphasize that effective control of the noise at its source is the most cost effective and efficient means of avoiding a problem. B. The best means of avoiding the creation of an acoustic nuisance is to provide a large buffer area around the source of the noise. In the case of this Proposal, the distance between the Hadley Road residents and the O'Dell Park complex's parking area is decreasing and there are no actions currently planned to try to mitigate this condition: Thus it is likely that the residents will experience increased noise levels due to the proposed site modifications. C. 'The next best means of minimizing noise problems would be to block or deflect the noise away from the Hadley Road area. Deflecting the noise would require a solid barrier with resilient qualities. This could bean earth berm or some type of wall. Blocking the noise would require a barrier capable of absorbing the sound energy. Such a barrier could be created by either hard "constructed" surfaces or soft surfaces of plants. D. I suggest that evergreen trees be installed on the south side of the fence to help absorb some of the sound power near its source. An earth berm could also be constructed in this area to help deflect some of the sound over the top of the neighborhood. The berm could be 5'-6' in height and blend well with the sloped area between the south side of the tennis courts and the new east parking area. In reality there area number of approaches available that might involve combining many of these features in an efficient and cost effective manner. For example, placing the fence atop an earth berm constructed north of the new parking area north of Bambino's would allow the height of the fence to be lower than a fence at the same location without a berm (see Item IV.H above). E. One other suggestion I would make is the installation of speed bumps in the main car travel lane running east -west from the northeast corner of the ne east parking lot to the northeast corner of the Ben Franklin building. This road is over 500 feet long with no turns or stops and will likely be used by patrons of Bambino's as a shortcut to the exit at Shelburne Road, swinging north around Ben Franklin. Engine noise along this road will be an acoustic issue but safety concerns for other patrons leaving the building at night should also be a concern. Speed bumps would cause people to slow down and encourage them to use O'Dell Parkway. Hadley Aoad Resident Concerns O'Dell Park PCD page 7 Thank you for your consideration of this information. I hope I have been able to clarify some of the concerns of the Hadley Road residents and provide a basis for discussion. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of any assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Thomas B. O'Brien, Partner PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, June 22, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: Final Plat application of David Farrell & Stuart McConaughy, Trustees, Thomas Farrell, Doner; Farrell Corporation; and David Farrell for a planned commercial development consisting of a new bank building with drive -through service, existing car wash, existing office building, existing restaurant/bar building, and leased parking for the adjoining Ben Franklin business, Shelburne Road. Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission June 5, 1993 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: Preliminary Comments June 22, 1993 agenda items Date: June 18, 1993 O'DELL PARK OFF SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Filter fabric is an acceptable alternate to a sand cushion in roadway construction. 2. Hay bales for erosion control are acceptable alternate to filter fabric. 3. Plans prepared by Civil Engineering Associates are well done and are acceptable. MARCELINO COMPANY, 4050 WILLISTON ROAD (PALMER CIRCLE) 1. Plan SPL revised 4/30/93 prepared by Gordon Woods is acceptable. PROVENCHER SUBDIVISION, CENTRAL AVENUE The 5 foot easement should be restricted as to use so as not to interfere with the maintenance of that side of house number 41. JUDGE DEVELOPMENT, 100 DORSET STREET Plan prepared by Dunn Associates dated March 1992 is acceptable. R.B.G. OFFICE BUILDING, 625 HINESBURG ROAD 1. A pedestrian access to Timberlane should be provided. 2. In closing the existing driveway, the asphalt sidewalk shall be removed and a new concrete sidewalk poured. e;/ I= V' w" Gj" 710 /02 - 7/�/ 2 2 a �4 /��� - Cf/ iT FrU I 65w 7i5`� 15- 5W 3�6)�y._/3 2- c k) �6a YL) %.woo 2%7 ,� �� D�� l9 � ijF �'= asa8 3948 17Y8'X b 75=� '-- i O'DELL PARK PROJECT COST ESTIMATE Page 2 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING: 3% x 250,000 2% x 250,000 1% x 69,200 ON SITE LANDSCAPING COST ESTIMATE $ 7,500 5,000 692 13 192 Rey Quantity Botanical Name Common Name Unit price Cost 35 Prunus Glandulosa Dwarf Flowering Almond x $125/EA = $ 4,375. B 8 Tilia Corpata Littleleaf Linden x $300/EA = $ 2,400. C 14 Quercus Rubra Northern Red Oak x $300/EA = $ 4,200. * 30 Juniperis Horizontalis Andorra Juniper x $ 40/EA = $ 1,200. W 21 Salix Babylonica Weeping Willows x $125/EA = $ 1,200. D 10 Thuja Northern Ocicidentalis White Cedar x $ 75/EA = $ 750. SITE LANDSCAPING TOTAL = $15,550. STREET TREES COST ESTIMATE Key Quantity Botanical Name B? -1-2 Tilia Corpata C 19 Quercus Rubra Common Name Unit price Cost Littleleaf Linden x $700/EA = $ 8,400. Northern Red Oak x $700/EA = $13,300. STREET TREE TOTAL = $21,700. �ly-6533 3 ✓� �S -f co yea fob �- No. 70^ qty 6st. qt 3�5 i = xa s �a a8 f ��4�1,45�A�i�d �►4ccsA�d ;ran fi�,zr��i g o y $ J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / HOME AVENUE 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I N/F J k B SNYDER HADLEY ROAD R.O.W. I N/F I N/F G. k W. I L k L I GRIGGS BROOKS I N/F W. WOLFE LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED -- PROPERTY LINE - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDGE OF PAVEMENT/CURB SUNKEN CURB _____________--..._._______- __ __-_--------_ SIDEWALK DUMPSTER Oa TREE -- O SHRUB e O FENCE HANDICAP RAMP B. BARNEY I T.N& P. I N/F I N/F I N/F I N/F I I I L.P. BROOKS R. k M. F. h J. I W.C. LSTARKMIA'J.HNASKINS I REDFIELD I KOCHMAN PEARSON I I -- ----BACON --------------T r— I 1 , SATDIIE EKS,ES -- -- ❑ -- I I❑ 'y C%P I Y I I q �ANTONII 0 WVNY N/F N I B I ® -...I R. CHAMPLAIN OIL CO. INC. REYES v \ • D PARKSIS IIEMARemmaryS: WN FRANKUN ISY PRDII PERMIT? 105 SPACES WVNY 11, 700 SF . 250 SFISPACE 47 SPACES' SEAWAY CM WASH 10 SPACES CWTTFNDEN BANK PUBLIC USE 400 SF . 100 SF(SPACE 4 SPACES GENERAL USE 1.860 SF . 250 SFISPACE 8 SPACES 6AMSMDs SEATS 365 ST . 3 SEATSISPACE 122 SPACES CROSS AREA 16.511 SF 4,380 SF • 12,131 SF 12,131 SF . 200 SFICPACE 81 SPACEE TOTAL REOUERED IEXCLUOING C n.Alf 357 SPACES TOTAL PROVIDED 233 SPACES . ADJACENT PROPERTY 50 SPACES OR AFTER 4.00 PM 110 SPACES 333 TO 383 SPACES 'CURRENTLY HAS A MAXIMUM OF 30 EMPLOYEES ON SITE FROM 3:00 F. 00 M SLRLO,WL COVERAW WIDEN FRANKLIN W40 BEN FRANKLIN LOT SIZE I,.81 Ac., ,•. F, C' ARE " 1.35 Ac. 0.5.. SLi'( a;. 11.6% 3.3% OVICE ' 30.0% 20:U% N: _c•:' "..,NKLRI WO BEN FRANKLIN 6.LI9At 5.67 A, 52.5% 7% 'tLOWEr- 70.0% 70.056 a L"ISTING 151.AND7 JQ�1ANO_YAL NEW PARKWAY \---------------J L— SOUTH BURLINGTON FACTORY OUTLET CENTER N/F HEATHCOTE ASSOCIATES PHILIP MEHLER REALTY GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 L SO im 200 350 ( at Par 1 r— r — r— r— r— r— I I I I I I O L� 1 T I I I I I I 10 r-- L BAMBINOS EXIST. SINGLE ROW OF CEDARS SUPPLEMENT WITH A SECOND ROW OF CEDARS N/F BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, INC. RECEIVED JUN 10 S93 I City of So. Burlington I t � Exrssa r1ElXz I � Leo I N/F R.M. STEVENS JOY DRIVE {72 N/F OLYMPIAD COURT ASSOCIATES I I 070 N/F OLYMPIAD COURT L----------- ------------- I ' ASSOCIATES I I I I -,�- --I----I-=---4 , —_—_�— --c — t r_11= _� I _ __c-Evor PAwmiJ-- -L -L- -�- CONc waKaw clas I I i 1 It: 5 � I y I � I I LANDSCAPING SCHEDULE N/F NEW ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 I KE E ouarau. I1.11n1QLm&EEK1 Cnmmanllaaw s m SON" O 35 Roma Glanaubaa 0wv1 Flowarky I I Al,.w„a 2.5 Gal. As Shown I I I B 22 T" C.'— L.WwN E..ew 2111' Cal Aa on— 1 I C 35 Owrcus R— NOrtMn Rae Oak 276' CaL M Shown 1t" 31, JVnipern ® o Hot mll9 A. "q— 1 WI. 24' O.C. E.W. 'aO ®5.7.n tar Ad J W Salia BaDvbnKa Waapiny WSbw I' C.I. 40' O.C. E.W. aWF IaAHnw LOaO•� AIWA lAl�. aI— LWr1ai • PAIaeM .Q s-x.a oar Appm PAaNwa • WCaCMa,a Q tiz_aa pw Amen .aa¢ Pa7n D :3 Ttwla Otclaws6s NrDwn W AW CWw 3'4' Hp.D• D.C. 8 .-E-aa D• ro+m err ran.0 }" CAL FOR. REIN R.O.W. STREET TIMS Q e}aa per aEVLYp cols CUT4, PAwes 70M11 Date Ch'k"d R.-- Drawn by ACL. Dow APRIL, 1993 Checked by -AML Scent r • 30' Approved by - Project No. 93108 XiRiIOGBLE IF. OF "a"'a FROM NEW LNTmltlsE3, C. CITY OF SOU14 wIRMCTUI 1 < ! ! 4 1 ! I � I GARDENS FOP ALL, INC. J ! ! I 1 , I 1 / 1 / J SITE & LANDSCAPING PLAN O'DELL PARK PCD )UTH BURLINGTON VERM( SHEET CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. $i aaffE . V6\DOFR C - 2 aWF IaAHnw LOaO•� AIWA lAl�. aI— LWr1ai • PAIaeM .Q s-x.a oar Appm PAaNwa • WCaCMa,a Q tiz_aa pw Amen .aa¢ Pa7n D :3 Ttwla Otclaws6s NrDwn W AW CWw 3'4' Hp.D• D.C. 8 .-E-aa D• ro+m err ran.0 }" CAL FOR. REIN R.O.W. STREET TIMS Q e}aa per aEVLYp cols CUT4, PAwes 70M11 Date Ch'k"d R.-- Drawn by ACL. Dow APRIL, 1993 Checked by -AML Scent r • 30' Approved by - Project No. 93108 XiRiIOGBLE IF. OF "a"'a FROM NEW LNTmltlsE3, C. CITY OF SOU14 wIRMCTUI 1 < ! ! 4 1 ! I � I GARDENS FOP ALL, INC. J ! ! I 1 , I 1 / 1 / J SITE & LANDSCAPING PLAN O'DELL PARK PCD )UTH BURLINGTON VERM( SHEET CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. $i aaffE . V6\DOFR C - 2 1 i I I I I I I I I � I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I AVENUE \ I I 1 I I I I 1 I ; I I J N/F J & B SNYDER LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED - -- PROPERTY LINE - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDGE OF PAVEMENT/CURB SUNKEN CURB ............................ ----_---___ SIDEWALK DUMPSTER HADLEY ROAD R.O.W. V TREE -- -- - - I I I O SHRUB FENCE # 0 X HANDICAP RAMP N/F W. WOLFE — BACON STREET I I C qP I I �qsy N/F N/F o -4MPLAIN OIL CO. INC. A. & R. REYES /> / B _ �� •�' � s j�"a :ltolN' aeNNNA'r' % 4z, URBS S� ..\ PARKING REQUIREMENTS: BEN FRANKLIN (BY PRIOR PERMIT) 105 SPACES WVNY 11.700 SF - 750 IFlSPACE 47 SPACES SEAWAY CAR WASH 10 SPACES CWTTENDEN BANK PUBLIC USE 400 SF 1(!D SF/St'ACE SPACES GENERAL USE 1.860 SF . 2S0 `LF:!SPACE "ACES BAMBINOS SEATS 365 ST . 3 SEATSSPACE 122 :>AACES CROSS AREA 1 C.511 SF - 4.380 SF . 12.131 SF 12.131 SF . 200 SFSPACE 61 SPACES TOTAL REQUIRED (EXCLUDING OVERLAP) 357 SPACES TOTAL PROVIDED 283 SPACES . ADJACENT PROPERTY 50 SPACES OR AFTER 6:00 PM jQQ SPACES 333 TO 383 SPACES 'CURRENTLY HAS A MAXIMUM OF 30 EMPLO TEES ON SITE FROM 3:00 PM TO 1) PM BUILDING COVERAGE W/BEN FRANKLIN WW BEN FRANKLN LOT SIZE 11.61 . 11.19 A.. BLDG. AP 1.35 Ac. 0.93 Ac. BLDG.% 11.1% 8.3% ALLOWED 10.0% 30.0% LOT COVERAGE W. BEN FRANKLIN 4�0 BEN FRANKLIN 1' COV. .> 8.09 Ac. 5.67 Ae. :T COV.% 52.5% :'.LOWED 70.0% 70.0% F- - G.N&FW. I L.N&FL I B. BARNEYFI T.N&FP. I N/F, I N/F I N/F I N/F L.P. BROOKS R. & M. F. & J. I W.C. GRIGGS I BROOKS I J. KAHAN I HASKINS I I REDFIELD I KOCHMAN I PEARSON I M. STARKMAt1� WEEPING WLLOWS BURLINGTON FACTORY OUTL-T CENTER N/F HET. 'IL,OTE ASSOCIATES 'HILIP MEHLER REALTY 0 CEDAR HEDGE �--HOLE W BERM `-"DRI4(WATER" FIELD 3LE ROW)) Fqt SITE DRAINAGE GROWN CEDAR E S' O.C. STAGGERED I TOP OF 3' HIGH BERM SAIF111E DISHE6 i ANTENNA I WVNY I ® -•-I PARKWAY NEW BANK 11 LDG. A 0 ® ! ml ,- , F �I, r— r- r- - r— —T I I I I I I I I I Ja1f1^.,.......,`. GRAPHIC SCALE ;'y:� •: sat: A :.v J "U IOU 2fN 1R0 � :0 01 ]^ R TF EXIST. SINGLE ROW OF CEDARS SUPPLEMENT WITH A SECOND ROW OF CEDARS #BO I N/F R.M. STEVENS JOY DRIVE I I f2 I N/F OLYMPIAD N/F BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, INC. I COURT ASSOCIATES I, I I I #70 E N/F ---1 OLYMPIAD EXIAING HEata I 1 COURT L-- — — — — — — —_—_-- I ASSOCIATES I I I C------- 1 I —T— --I-- --4 I I I z, of • r-11— I1 1 IFVTUNE Ir 1 —GONG. PARKING CZAR I I I / W I —J--L------- I�1 1 I w I ,V q v D q In,i -- -- GARDENS FOR ALL. INC. a B c / I I I 11 �- IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDI I / FROM NEW ENTERPRISES INC. -i CITY OF SOUTH wRUNOToN ~j LANDSCAPING SCHEDULE N/F NEW ENTERPRISES, INC. � I Kai Q.—I. B.I.—I Name C.— N.— so M Prunes GIA — — Fk W." A4norW 2.5 G.I. A. Sh— I B 22 Tilt. C.". L"u~ LNIdMI 2%- Ca4 AF Shown C 35 Ouarcua Rues NMharn Raa Oat 2%' Cab As Shown *' 30 Juni I H.6—tall. AM—Jlmlpw 1 GaL 24' O.C. E.W. J I. 20 SaIL] Baeylorw WaapinD Win— 2' C.I. 40' O.C. E.W. - 192 ..... CEDM a' TNT. 5' O.G 0 15 Tnuw OccWehofia No—n Whit, C.on 3'4' HD.s' O.C. * +- ::AL FOR. NON R.O.W. 3TREE7 TRM3 / 0 4L '.zFx] D3M ADDED a1aaN BEIar • cEmw -Ill D3M MOOTED m1 PRANtLIN LOAOINa AIWA "COU, 1)LAND, REIBED U-- a PA— i-1!) {YW AC(.eD ANWN • IJOIMUAN I-2-13 O)M ADDED aBRIE ATM r-2-lJ oar Iroym err raOaN REVPED NIN Cut). PANW lOIA13 Date Ch'k'd Rev -on Drawn by 'CL Checked by --M ADP roved by — Date APR_ IL 1993 Scale Protect No. 93108 SITE & LANDSCAPING PLAN O'DELL PARK PCD SOUTH BURUNGTON VERM( SHEET ITN CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. SHELB om - VERMONT C - 2 /—I'll"TREATEo WOOD' nICORAINI! FENCE I¢N¢ POST CTTP) F im niifin am A"nisi 0 nI HE m a a \ " G.: NC CURIO AHCROR STRAP TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATION s" I � � 1 wOOOlN O I O R.NPSTER I INCLOSURe p O O L_•III��- GRASS A aO 'O 4UMPSTE?R — CCNC. CUR" 4 R+FRVSSDRN c TRlATED' POST (Tyr_) LbrtuMRNous CONIC ^ OECORATWE CIA,E N( C-6 501.4 IIT, TO MATCH DECORATIVa FENCT. TRASH ENCLOSURE_SECT[QN T S. TRUNK ARMORING L)ETAIL a N. . 1.��DECIDUOUS ocmoN Iron I� Ho SC lA.L1YION AI ILAc !i�lr an,NCNaa W149Lm ' CCOAR !TAME3 inc-.fban ue ,•-f•ef rosro TA'. WAA.n NO TO NOfC WOOO ON N "' ILAO T.......1... WIN{ TWIfT —iuLCN L aiGW roi oias�licu r NHN IANTN fAUCU `,jT A ID, TO. ./�A LOAN i•irIRRANi aiAoa .R{IAA{a TO.fdl aAGRlILL 1 NOTIII FOR MC-4 TRaaf Ufa 21f18• CKIMA STARaf. FOR EVARGACaM NCaf Uaa OUY •/IRaa WITH 21112'-9' OOOO STARK& TREE PLANTING TYPICAL N. i B' CEDAR STAKES WI CUT NOTCH__ '� ... aN WIRE PASSED THROVGl1 SECTZ-_\ OF GARDEN HOSE TO PROTECT TRUNK I PAPER TRUNK WRAPPING - LAYER SRWEADED BANK MULCH (TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) _I APPA. I 6' SAUCER RIM —LOOSER CUT. S REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP } OF ROOT BALL I PLANT TREE AT SAME DEPTH AT WHC14 TREE -M) PREVOUSLY GROWK 11II —I I II_ _I r11 -RE— Ti _,_ _ I _� ;111P=ITL—iI a_ _CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE KT.1 I FILTER FABRIC --\ NOTE EXCAVATE A 6' A 6' TRENCH AROUND OUTSIDE OF SILT FENCE AND EXTEND FILTER FABRIC INTO TRENCH BACKFILL 8 COMPACT SOL FLOW CATCH BASIN —/ 2 a 4 WCODEN STAKES DRIVEN MN. Yl NTO THE GROUND . P b. WOODEN LATERAL CROSS BRACING AS NEEDED SILT FENCE INS i ALL ATION AT CATCH BASINS _� . T S. FINISH GRADE MULCH FINISH GRADE GRASS MULCH LAYER A:_ . . 1 1 UNLESS CALLED FOR OTHERWISE, NO CENTER OF ANY SHRUB SHALL BE CLOSER THAN 4'-0" TO ANY WALK, CURB, OR PAVEMENT. SHRUB BED PLANTING TYPICAL J�, J A' SAUCER RM '4- LAYER OF SH EAOED BARK MULCH - TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCH) r LOOSEN, CUT. a REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP ITS OF ROOT BALL PLANT SHRUB AT SAME DEPTH AT WHICH SHRUB HAD PREVIOUSLY GROWN F-NOTE SHREADEO R FABRIC MULCH I AND WEED BARBER FABRIC C 1 TO BE CONTNUOUS WHEN USED N BE OS 111�11j1 ll� IllR _BALL 8 BURLAP SHRUB HTA• jow 1v„ Il=ill=III=III BARE ROOT SHRUB B' X S' 14 CA. HIRE MESH JO' HIGH AND BURIED !' BELOW GRADE HOOKED TD STEEL STARES (WIRE MESH CAN BE ELAWATED FOR FENQ 24- OR LOWER) .FILTER FABYBCapPED OR WRED TO MESL TO BE MfYAFT YOUR OR APPROVED EQUAL JO' AT DW 214 A y 4 4 2r 'ENGE NDAHI POST 2j . 4 WOOD 125, 1 S' FILTER FABRIC TO BE CL/PPEq —OO1a M[TA. PORT S' f BACKFI[LED AND TAMPED O' 11.4 N•O� IR W BELOW GRADE STEEL OR WOOD STAKES SEE CHART a RIGHT TEM INSTALLILL SET FENCES AT 70CS OF UNPR07ECTED SLOPES AND AS PARALLEL TO CONTOURS AS POSSIBLE CURVE WE ENDS OF THE FENCE UP WTO THE SLOPE REMOVE SEDIMENT OREN ACCUMULATED 70 HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE COV7RACMR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCES AT ME TOE OF ALL FILLED OR UNPR07EC7ED SLOPES CREA7E0 DURING CGW57RUCDCN. NOT NECESSARILY REFLECTED ON FINAL PLANS SILT FENCES ARE TO BE MAW7AINE0 UNTIL SLOPES ARE STABILIZED. AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE COJTRACTO7. SILT FENCE DETAIL N.Ts. PROPOSEDPROPJ I/ WILLOW FIELD GROWN "N CEDAATER' f / /� FIELD GROWN CEDAM IgYR.\t I 0 m L—COARSE LIMESTONE IN FILTER FABRIC AT EXISTING CEDARS BUFFER DETAIL I /4' . 1'-0' 1992, Green Mountain was an easy winner Peoples &atnerine Vreelua. IAVER TIME S OTICES TION TO BID f MOUNTAIN DLLEGE IVATION OF ACADEMIC CILITIES 1 1LEGAL NOTICES ds for the reno- Ackley, Dunton, ce halls, located Mountain Col - jitney, Vermont, calved until 3:00 Thursday, June Bids shall be d to Mr. Robert Dean of Admin- Affairs, Green College, Poult- 5764. k shall be sub - complete by ar 1, 1993, in or- Ilow use of the snovated for nor - ties. nd contract Doc - /ill be available to erested General x at 10:00 a.rn. 1, June 4, 1993, Reprographics :., 191 Columbian Rutland, VT a $120 plans and is deposit paya- Reprographics 50 percent of refundable if the J documents are in as -issued con - Mailing charges Ne in advance by requesting plans uments, and are dabie. UPS serv- ailable for a $10 tdable fee. Sub ors should re- lans through the Contractor or r for the individual nd specifications through Reprogr- South Inc. Partial non-refundable. id shall be pre- ind submitted in rice with the In - is to Bidders, on form bound within act Manual. old must be ac- ied by a Bid ank Draft, or Cer- heck payable to vtountain College, amount not less a percent (5%) of ;e Bid. The suc- General Bidder rnish and pay for !cry one hundred (1009/6) Perfor- and Payment id conference will J on Thursday, 1993 at 10:00 at en Mountain Col- 3intenance Build- Mtendance Is ended, but not )ry, for submitting \t the time of the conference, Bid- ly request clarifi- of the Bidding nts from the Ar- md the Owner, as have the opportu- -d Next Column nity to walk the Project site. Prospective Bidders may request clarifications of the Bid Documents from the Architect by contact- ing Mr. Charles H. Brew- er, Jr. at telephone (802) 875-3146. All requests for clarifications from the Ar- chitect will be received until June 14. 1993. Green Mountain College reserves the right to reject any and all bids, and to waive any formalities or informalities in the bid- ding. By order of Robert W. Kittle, Dean of Adminis- traive Affairs, Green Mountain College. June 4, 5, 6, 1993 INVITATION TO BID Milton Graded School Dis- trict is requesting bids for the installation of an IN- CLINED PLATFORM WHEELCHAIR LIFT at the School Street School lo- cated on School Street in Milton, Vermont. Interested bidders should submit sealed bids to Mil- ton Graded School Dis- trict, 2 Herrick Ave. Milton, VT 05468, ATTN: John C. Gifford, Business Manager, by June 18, 1993 at 3:00 p.m. Bid information and speci- fication can be obtained by calling Mr. Scott Har- rington, Facilities Man- ager at (802) 893-3236. June 5, 6, 7, 8, 1993 Lamoille Regional . Solid Waste Management District RR 1 Box 2264 Morrisville, Vermont 05661 802/888-7317 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS The Lamoille Regional Solid Waste Management District (LRSWMD) is re- questing proposalls from qualified firms to transfer mixed solid waste (MSW), and construction and de- molition debris (C&D from the District Drop-offs lo- cated in Johnson and Wolcott, Vermont, and from the Stowe Transfer Station in Stowe, Vermont to the Waste USA landfill In Coventry, Vermont for the period of approxi- mately July 1, 1993 through June 30, 1994. Respondents must dem- onstrate experience, de- pendability, and the capability to pick-up, swap, and empty fully loaded 40 cubic yard and 50 cubic yard roll -offs, and fully loaded compac- tion transfer trailers (one 65 cubic yard trailer and one 75 cubic yard trailer). Proposals are due by 5:00 PM, June 22, 1993. For more information, call LRSWMD at (802) 888- 7317._.-. .. Continued Next Column LEGAL NOTICES June 5, 6, 7, 1993 NOTICE OF ELECTIONS The Farmers Home Ad- ministration (FmHA) County Committee elec- tion this year will be held on July 1, 1993. The ballot below must be filled out, detached, and mailed and received or returned in person to the FmHA Es- sex Junction County Of- fice, 12 Market Place, Essex Junction, VT 05452 not later than July 1, 1993. If you do not vote in person you should mail your ballot inside a blank envelope marked BAL- LOT to ensure a secret ballot. This blank enve- lope should be placed in- side the envelope you use to mail your ballot. Your name and address must be legible on the outer envelope. Failure to pro- vide this information will render your ballot invalid. Ballots and envelopes may also be obtained from your local FmHA of- fice. The slate of nominees for Chittenden/Grand Isle Counties are listed in the ballot below. The qualifi- cations of persons voting are described in the "VOTER CERTIFICATION STATEMENT". Further in- formation regarding vot- ing and voter eligibility can be obtained from the county office listed above. FmHA elections are open to all eligible voters re- gardless of race, color, religion, national origin, age, political affiliation, marital status, sex, and/or handicap. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION BALLOT FOR COUNTY COMMITTEE MEMBER(S) STATE: VERMONT COUNTY: CHITTENDEN- /GRAND ISLE *CANDIDATES: THOMAS B. BUSHEY *ONLY VOTE FOR ONE CANDIDATE (PLEASE DETACH THIS NOTICE BEFORE VOTING BALLOT) VOTER CERTIFICATION STATEMENT Subpart W of Part 2054 of Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations requires that all voters for FmHA coun- ty or area committee elec- tions meet the following eligibility requirements: (a) be farmers; (b) derive the principal part of their in- come from farming (that is more than 50 percent of their gross income must come from agricultural production); (c) have their principal farming opera - Continued Next Column LEGAL NOTICES tion within the county or area for which the elec- tion is being held. By submitting this ballot, I attest that I meet the cri- teria to vote. June 5, 1993 PAVING BID The Town of Hinesburg will be accepting bids for the placement of 2500 for of Type II and Type III Bituminous Concrete. Bid forms may be obtained at the Hinesburg Highway Department or the office of the Hinesbura Town Administrator. Appoint- ments are required to re- view the project locations by calling Steven R. My- ers at 482-2635. Sealed bids will be accepted until June 10, 1993, 10:00 a.m. at the meeting room, Hi- nesburg Town Hall. They will be then opened and publicly read. The Town of Hinesburg reserves the right to reject any or all bids. May 29, June 5, 1993 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, June 22, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: Final Plat application of David Farrell & Stuart Mc- Conaughy, Trustees, Thomas Farrell, Doner; Farrell Corporation; and David Farrell for a planned commercial de- velopment consisting of a new bank building with drive -through service, existing car wash, exist- ing office building, exist- ing restaurant/bar building, and leased park- ing for the adjoining Ben Franklin business, Sel- burne Road. Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission June 5, 1993 STATE OF VERMONT WATER RESOURCES BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING In re: Petition for Reclassification of Brickyard Road wet- lands Essex Junction, Vermont Docket No. WET-92-04 Authority: 10 V. S.A. §905(7-9) and the Vermont Wetland Rules Continued Next Column LEGAL NOTICES 1 I The Water Re- sources Bord will con- vene a public hearing in the above -captioned mat- ter on Tuesday, June 22, 1993, at 2:00 p.m. at the Congregational Church_, 39 Main Street, Essex Junc- tion, Vermont. A site visit of the subject wet - !and will be conducted be- ginning at 1:00 p.m. Dated at Montpelier, Vermont, this 2nd day of June, 1993. Kristina L. Bielenberg, As- sistant Executive Officer and Legal Counsel, Water Resources Board, 58 East State Street, Drawer 20, Montpelier, Vermont 05620-3201. June 5, 1993 STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION MONTPELIER VERMONT 05633 ABANDONED VEHICLE NOTICE The State of Ver- mont, by its Agency of Transportation, hereby gives notice that the De- partment of Motor Vehi- cles declares that the below described motor vehicle is to be declared abandoned in accordance with 24 V.S.A. 2272(d)(1): 1980 Ford Fiesta VIN GCFBAB260870 The owner may re- claim the vehicle prior to June 21, 1993 by present- ing proof of title and pay- ing all costs incurred, to the Vermont Agency of Transportation, 120 State Street, Montpelier, Ver- mont 05603-0001. Dated at Montpelier, County of Washington, State of Vermont this 28th day of May 1993. Vt Agency of Transportation Ronald E. Macie Chief Inspector (Its Duly Authorized Agent) June 5, 1993 TOWN OF HIGHGATE The Town of Highgate is accepting bids on a 1968 Clark Model 290M Tractor and Wabco CT4 Towed Earth Mover and Scrap- per. Interested persons may schedule an appoint- ment for inspection by contracting the Town Manager's Office at 868- 4922. Written bids will be accepted until 4:30 PM on July 2, 1993. The Board of Selectmen reserve the right to accept or reject any and all bids. Bids may be forwarded to Town Manager's Office, Municipal Office Building, P.O. Box 67, Highgate, VT Continued Next Column LEGAL NOTICES 1 05459. As per order of the Selectmen. May 20, 1993 June 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 1993 ABSOLUTELY FREE 2 BELGIAN SHEPHERD 2 yr old female. Sweet, intelligent, great with young kids. We have too many dogs! Free to the right home. 877-2423 BUNNIES Adorable, all shades, all sizes. Please call 899-3443. CANNING JARS - ap- prox. 75 with bails. Pints & quarts. Must take all. 878-5849, leave message. ADVERTISING WITH STARS IS LIKE PUTTING YOUR NAME IN LIGHTS_ FREE CATS - grey tiger and black and white. Sep- arately, or together. Small, friendly, box - trained. Great compan- ions. Call eves. til 9 pm 985-8054. FREE CAT - To a good home. 2-3 yrs, all shots, female, spayed, beautiful. 658-4094 FREE KITTENS 9 weeks old and 3 weeks old. 425-3047 FREE TO GOOD HOMES 1 Dalmatian mix, 1 Great Dane mix. Both 4 years old. Great with older kids. Prefer theyy, go together. Call 434-4503. HARDWOOD SKIDS 36. Come & haul away. Call Don at 864-5373 * * * * ADVERTISING WITH STARS " IS LIKE PUTTING YOUR NAME IN LIGHTS LOBBY CARPET 400+ yards. Must be re- moved on Sun, June 6th after 3 pm. 1 st come, 1 st serve. Holiday Inn, 1068 Williston Rd. 863-6363 SELL "IDLE MMS" WRH A G7ASSWEP AD. CALL 658-3321 V A; City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7955 658-7958 June 18, 1993 James Lamphere Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: O'Dell Parkway/Chittenden Bank Dear Mr. Lamphere: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and revised comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and myself. Comments from Fire Chief Jim Goddette were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June 22, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si erely, J je Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp cc: David Marshall Frank Kochman 75 Hadley Road South Burlington, VT 05403 June 16, 1993 Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Hadley Road Residents' "Petition to South Burlington Plan- ning Commission Concerning Proposed O'Dell Park Planned Commer- cial Development." Dear Joe: In anticipation of the Planning Commission meeting of June 22, enclosed please find the captioned petition, signed by 20 residents of Hadley Road representing 15 separate residences. There may well be more signatures coming on separate copies of the same petition. I enclose extra copies to facilitate distribu- tion to the members of the Planning Commission. At the April 27 meeting, one of the members remarked that she was under the impression that the neighbors were somehow not in agreement about the appropriateness of the Farrells' plans. That is a misimpression, which this petition is intended to cor- rect. As you can see, there is overwhelming agreement that the landscaping and screening proposal is completely inadequate, and there is also overwhelming agreement as to the minimum changes necessary to address the common concerns. In addition, some of the neighbors have special concerns. For example, Mrs. Griggs at 29 Hadley seeks fencing that con- ceals all of the commercial buildings, especially the car wash, which became her backyard view when the woods were stripped away. Dr. Barney at 37 Hadley particularly wants to see an earth berm as part of the screening. Jennifer and I are specially concerned that the proposed (and largely beside the point) plantings in the right of way will block the only physical access we have to our backyard for emergency and service vehicles. (We have a legal right to the access and the house was built the way it is in obvious contemplation of that right.) We hope that the petition will serve to convey how strongly the neighbors feel about the inadequacy of the final plat. Sincerely, Frank Kochman enclosure cc: (with enclosure) Michael Flaherty, Chairman Joseph A. Parent, 67 Hadley Road Susan Bashaw, 73 Hadley Road Sarah and Ron Cadorette, 71 Hadley Road Louise P. Brooks, 33 Hadley Road Bernard Barney and Jane Quilliam, 37 Hadley Road Peter Kunin, 70 Hadley Road Milford and Dorothy Delorme, 99 Hadley Road William Pearson, 89 Hadley Road Nancy Sherman, 86 Hadley Road Hollace and Brian Reed, 80 Hadley Road Lucy T. Brown, 94 Hadley Road Janet V. Delneo, 66 Hadley Road Billie and Glen Griggs, 29 Hadley Road 2 PETITION TO SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CONCERNING PROPOSED O'DELL PARK PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT We, residents of Hadley Road, have examined the fencing and landscaping plans for the O'Dell Park Planned Commercial Develop- ment as shown on Sheet C-2 of the final plat submission. We note that the minutes of the 12/8/92 Planning Commission Meeting say "Members emphasized that they will ask for sufficient landscaping and screening for neighbors in the residential area." We thank the Planning Commission for expressing that inten- tion. We think the new landscaping to the south of the Hadley Road property lines is not deep enough, dense enough, or other- wise adequate to provide effective and aesthetically acceptable screening, and that the moved -back fence is not high enough. In particular: 1. The plat says that the willows will each be 2 inch caliper and will be planted at intervals of 40 feet from each other. *These tiny plants at wide intervals will not provide any screening at all or take up any meaningful amount of water for years. *While they may eventually become useful to take up some water, even the matured willows will provide no effective screen in the fall and winter seasons. 2. As to "rosa multi -flora," the proposed bush, Four Seasons gardening center advises: "Rosa multi -flora is a five-foot high weed that the Extension Service would like to figure out how to get rid of. It tends to colonize and takes over wherever it is planted." Four Seasons could give no price because they do not sell it. They said: "Any farmer would be happy to supply it to anyone who would dig it out and probably would provide a truck to move it with as well." It would threaten immature cedar trees if planted close to them. As a redeeming feature, we are told that it flowers once a season and has a nice smell while the flowers last. 3. The dense planting of tiny trees in the right of way is not necessary, especially when compared to the need for additional plantings south of the property lines. 4. It is hard to tell what the planned treatment is for existing trees and shrubs along the common property or right of way lines, since they are not shown. None of these trees or shrubs should be removed or cut back. Petition to South Burlington Planning Commission - Page 1 N 5. The fence along the north edge of the new parking lot has been moved further north in the final plat as com- pared to the preliminary plat. At its present height, the fence will not prevent headlights from the new parking lot from shining into the second -floor windows (at least) of Had- ley Road residences. Bambino's generates a stream of traf- fic with lights on until 2:30 A.M. The portion of this traffic which directly affects Hadley Road properties will increase substantially with the parking lot; with the fence moved back, the lights will shine into the properties. We make the following requests: First Request: Please require the developer to replace the rosa multi -flora with a closely planted row of soil -appropriate evergreen trees, such as white pine. Second Request: Please require the developer to add at least two more rows of trees, mostly evergreens, south of the line of willows, at intervals of ten feet between trees. (We sug- gest that the right of way plantings be eliminated or thinned out to help offset the cost.) Third Request: Please require all new trees to be at least eight to ten feet in height when planted. Fourth Request: Please specifically require the developer not to remove or cut back any trees or shrubs along the common property line or right of way. Fifth Request: Please increase the height of the fence to twelve feet. SUBMITTED IN ANTICIPATION OF FINAL PLAT HEARING SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 22, 1993. is v ohcc u� -13 C 7( eg C t 4 L Petition to South Burlington�g Co iss on a e Petition to South Burlington Planning Commission - Page 3 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I T I I I I 1 E I HOME AVENUE E I 1 1 1 1 I I I i w I I I N/F J k B SNYDER s �ACOR" STRE�f—s . W r ti W0 I � � I C! I / x I / I N CHAMPLAIN OIL C�j INC. 11 JUN o z 1993 City of So. Burlington r I I I I I❑ I I I I II I I N/F A. do R. REYES 9 aroD LEGEND EMSTIN. PROPOSED -- PROPERTY LINE -- 2'_ —'--- CONTOUR O UGHTING E a -- -- -- ---. -- • FLOOD LIGHTS HADLEY ROAD R.O.W. _—.----------_ CURB SUNKEN CURB ............................. -- -- — -- — w— WATER R9�� s SANITARY SEWER s C, sr STORM SEWER N/F I N/F I N/F I I N/F I N/F N/F N/F I I N/F I G GAS D G. k W. I L. k L I B. BARNEY I T. k P. I L.P. BROOKS I R. k M. I F. & J. I W.C. UEUNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ue GRIGGS BROOKS J. KAHAN HASKINS REDFIELD KOCHMAN I PEARSON M. STARKMA q I v r POWER POLE • SHUT—OFF VALVE W REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF / /1 i -- -- _— —HANDICAP RAMP N/F W. WOLFE I \ _ _ ry I\ • I I I L \ W- -s- sF. 9 C' I BEN FRANKLIN /—!s Mva-s to (MIN M aBAMBINOS �w .w Rap - -- _ ~ _ /O DELL PARKWA L� I N/F BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, IN _\ � I 7 LL I I /F R.M. STEVENS JOY DRIVE I (/72 I N/F OLYMPIAD C. I COURT ASSOCIATES I I I i #70 L J N/F / _ I --------'-J\� r OLYMPIAD COURT \ � j ASSOCIATES V I I � I I I -- \c------ —` - j GARDENS FOR ALL, INC. _ _ • co (E%I ST)1140D/"—�� PLUG END OF Pea I 12+p0 13.00 1N00 17 FU R CENTM E OF 1- D'DEU- PARKWAY FROM NEW FROM NEW ENTERPRISES, MC. D I / 1— — —y -------- 21A �— / CITY OF SOUTH BURUNGTDN SOUTH BURLINGTON r r — — —� a0T/J1200LFIS-rvC �N/F NEW ENTERPRISES, INC. —� FACTORY OUTLET CENTER r i•FT— D.D10 J NOTE: ALL STORM r DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE SDR 35 PVC. HOPE (ADS) PIPE OR CONCRETE PIPE. v\ I N/F I I I I A EASEMENT / N FAVOR OF DAND M. iAgeE11�/ ' / IN FAVOR HEATHCOTE ASSOCIATES I I I AND STUART N. Y ADGIlY!11t I YARC11 s, Ian T�AYyD� DDNy PHILIP MEHLER REALTY — 205 , ® !-)! Da, R£VYPD — FRAa(La LDApN6 AREA -� _/ REV'. PARKING, WATER B DRAINAGE SYSTEMS 8 ♦-22-9 Oat AU. ADDED iE,YER EASEMENT --- - - NSTALL NEW STORY YN MS D�-2 ® Da, ADDEOa'auEPAT„ OVERALL UMIT MY_211.0 awrrr,,,, MV._20A.03 (YATLH "STING) 101"77gMo,, ® 1"2-9! paM ypNEp aya( a4lDyRAMAGE W JIARGE O, DELL PARK GRAPHIC SCALE y�sa5 M"R�y.y °: m !-2! a DSM REVMED cum LOTS ON O'ELL PARKWAY 5D o 25 50 Im 200 330 Date CI,'k'd Ren n SOUTH BURLINGTON Drawn by ACL [D:t, APRIL. 1993 ck • ;o s 9e,srt °'�`�.' CIVIL I ( IN IIQ•f) �yFA��µ�' � Chocked by ��.r" = 50'An.M;Approved by _roject No. 93108 r \\ � 11 i s ro w o I I I I V l 24' '4 \\ \ \ 1 I 1 \\ Dogma Go GRAVEL� D wvNY TII \ �/ N fF I I I N II / CHAMPLAINjOIL CO. INC. A. k ftAVEL II I I I REYES PAVED 211 � II L------ - --- - - - - - - - - I I II W �// // I C. TALL 6TEDE II 1�i1 ( I / /�/ ' I II - CONSIDEWALK/ p �� I 11 W II j I II w II � PA9rim 9AAw %,` oww (EX" GRIMY SON -zn WV-20 .7 36 I / \\ \ EXISTING VACues II i wm} A20 auo TO REMAIN NsrAu PANTEDaA1c Sur SIM E II T+PE / Ike `�t(2� II �t i 11 I\\ N 51TWIPE TTrE z 7►Aa I� � h0� i RAW / II BEN FRANKLIN / 1 -� + 24' II / 1 u• / I / �> >I'mE 2 11PAa IIOOIFY Dogma 7RARIC 'r I / II / -� x DOXR PER mw/ s-pr HOME TYPE 1 \ I AVENUE / 00-2 O\ t CONCRETE rA1RIOW " V EB-12 I \ NEW Dr �\ - / CURBS '�\ Y 42' 24' a' 4Y BAN{ NSTAu 7 1R0E TYPE 2 X BLDG- CONC�IE � ,� / MONOLITHIC SPACE 24' 1' T \ C CR MDR / CURB \�� I / 21;� r \\ q co-t CURVE x NSTALL A - 4s•oD•DD• I _ -T-FT _ CURE \\ NO WTLETRao-_ R - W.01'TFIT IT _ -_ - __ ru Y/ � T . iv4' Li 11 TTPE 2 _-__ L 9L4 I CONLIRSYLL90E\YAD( II uDO91m / .>: is ;:.: \ 7K b RAM 1 I 'CI ,, \ \ F RAMP yam$ RAr 2 r Nv..2n-A I 3 II I I 10 M l__________- z II GI I RAo ,\��� _ _ _ =•cj 3 d - J= iTVF.Y = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / zo / D C11-15 t*j IWST - - // a•a TIIE 1 SON (2 514Fo uurt / TYPE 1 r chi NSTALL 7rg.D CONC. SIDEWALK 910E / �:_ �RNN NSTAEI. s' COIIC. SIOEy/ALK f II II j I (u MPNH) C �/ s44t444 714T! (2s YPH) RAMP Ip 1 TyrE 1� RAtw � II II I I CLWW1 _ _ \ .e v M I -J �S II It\ III L ux //g" 3+0p----------- -' ------ ���\\ 5+00 T• 14 : sT II It J \v o R �r \ I I M_' �� \ rr / s "� "= O�DELL PARKWAY �+ �, II W. II_TYPE I :. ::.:. -- -- -- :� -- = --"--�------------ _ _---- O MATCH ERl'E11NL`` 11 ---- I R A D GRADE I l"--_ / II CS (E1a51� � \ 0 PWC END OF PIPE --` I�" � � E 1i ��_------------------------------- �- CURVE 3 •� NED I R - 35 U at (MD�)SMC� T . SS.20' g1ADE AT R0.l JUN 02 1993 UTILITY &GRADING PLAN — WEST afvf""oy'. O'DELL PARK PCD ^ ,. �, , 0 6- 93 OSN IEVL]fD W.NOS A Ce LMATIDNs 9. r'�ngton GRAPHIC SCALE i_ e� � '; = Date Ch k d Re,-- SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT V` L I �i al. LJ i - ` 20 0 10 20 b !0 14D ' y'•` Drawn by Ac_ D.te MAY 199T SHEET CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES . INC. �NNANLEad`,, Checked by DSM ScAle I' : 2C ar r:tT) •N•4•• $1SOCI E.V6TARON'T C._4 ( Approved by _ Prole ct No. 93108 / / / � I I r � o•oEu rwRK pRAIN1ADE !/ / I / I / • c. - _.. _, _. .. _-D fs OEECIffugh t3E➢g UAYA➢CM / I I Rim Out IN' 12' 1 210.05 Ce-10 Rim - 209.0 - � Im. 206.55 Mv. In LLI 15' 6tt1A me.m C620 IUm 274.E 15• 209.30 Inv. In (NOUN 12' 210.e5 C&2 R�m In Is'.. 12 I006.20 Im. In Isl 12• 209.90 Inv. Out I51 12• 210.75-7 Out INi 12• 206.10 Irn. Dln M'1 le• m9.10 M21 Rim - 216.6 kP h2 --� _J-/ r / I I I Cott Wm - 274.30 Irn. Out f5E1 12' 211.9 ■ 1 �' I / I r I I I C6 Rim - 210.60 Irn. Oul (N) 12' 210.50 OM/41 Pom - 215.25� ddt M ISI 12' 305.40 --- 1 I I I- In IE) awt. MAtch E...t. CW 12 Rim - 213.70 Irn. In IEI 16' 206.11 ` 313 _ _ Mv. In (EJ 16' 206.15 (/�� Mv. OW (W) E.Irt. MFKn E.ut. Inv. In (NE) 12• 209.68 V. put (6) 1S• 206.10 J U N o N 1993 Inv. In (rIV✓) 12' 2M.6e '`-- 21♦ C&4 Rim - 213.00 Mv. Out (SI 16' m9.6e /-- ---�� 215 219 / 2Tr / I O Im. Out INI 12' 209.50 C&13 Rlm - 214.90 OMH-2 ftm Mv. In INI 15' 2044 1 Mv. Out ISV/I 15' 210,70 216 / / 21e C&5 Rim - 213.20 Mv. M IEI 16tlAn 201.0. Wten Inv. In ISI 12' 209.25 / I Im. Ovt IEI 12• 209.20 C9-14 Rim -- 212.50 kw. Out M') 16• 204.Gz AYtcn EJ951WG fEh''�. Inv. Out I6EI 12• 209.0 BADE FENCE ° I 0 CB-6 Rim _ 213.820 - STOW RE Or-om 1T10N1Enial City of So. Burlin to� M IS) 12' 208.20 Ce-15 Rim 214.70 V INI 15' 208.10 Mv. In (NEI 15' 207.40 1m. Out fE' 15' 208.10 1- Out (SE) 1e' 207.30 �� i�Iam �. SLOPE m SOMA \ I CB-, to C 2 40' 12' 0.96 C&] Wm -- 214.75 ca-16 Pom = 210.0 I _ CB-2 m CS-3 93' 12• 0.84 Mv. M WVI 15' 20].00 Inv. In INI 9.p5 Irn. M RNWI is- zo6.95 Inv. Out (SW) m9.0 C6.5 to C 5 27' 12' 0.e3 I C9-4 to C65 2T 12• O.p Irn. M (5! 15' 210.40 C&6 to C&7 /43' 76' 0.77 �� \ • • O M, out IEI 18' 206. GO C9-1 ] R.- - 215.0 \ SV Inv. Out ISI 15' 20s.5 C 8 to C&7 27' 15' 2.22 w C 8 NW` - 214,50 C6] M DMH-1 7S' le• 1.00 I ( N _ 5.7 DMH-1 b C4AH 2 200' 19• 1.OD f \ Out INI 15' 211.00 CelB — Ou[ ISI 12' 211.7 CB-9 W CAIH4 lx2' 19' 0.0 \ \ I I C69 Ran - 214.90 C8-10b CI-9 36' 78• 1.11 Mv. M (E) 16' z0e.70 CS-19 214.4 Can m Cbto 27• 12' 2.22 & • D \ III INI 12' 211.m Mv. In 06 12' 210.35 M 12 m C93 96' 16' 0.51 0-17 I CIE \\ III 1 Inv. out w 1s• 3DI.so vN. put Is, Is • 210.25 cal3 m L'8-12 ST 12' 3.72 I L C9-14 W CL12 O' 12- 0.45 C&15 b C9-7 9e, 1P 0.61 \ _ _ C116 m7. C9-1C. 5 111' 182 19' O.e2 c8-is. C696 2{' 12• LOG tBtD mCbtO O' 15: 1,s9 C620 V, C 19 23' 12' 1.74 _ _ _ C 21 m CWZO 7P 12' 7.111 ' 'Al O p p _`��-•�\ \\ OF rw SEWER tAI>OE1R w rAWll `\� a'WP 1 / 1\ OBTA L NEW NVOMLTNLLVE \\ OF llETl F1rRlpteg5. INC. \ 1H\\ + Z' I I \ VAVE MEW N1VE WX \ . VALVE ANO ALVE Sox \ to GISTA-L ,V"ar TEE I �\ INSTALL CAST C PAfe CYIlS � \ -�-_ \\� vt I �\ 10• . 6• REDUCER ! emMANHOLE FOR aw1MG ANp 10. GTE VALVE i I 1 \ FOR EACH ACE iI 220 27, �' a MSTALL ,es L, or 6• sOs 36 S 1,11a INVERT 10 M1_. �. _ D _ - - s V lMElt IAIERAL WN. SLOPE - 4• • T FI-T \, .0 MSTA =MIEN / IPF CUTI' VOI EIOS11Nc r a..- - - - - - - t� ` b� I SEE DE1uL I W 99s-217.5 • T _ WV-297.4 �1i / 1 _ ----- -----=--_-__- ----'�'c� -- -- s ? s s - - - - - - - - �--I-t------------=�� ��� - ---- - I 1 _ t t---- UE -- �_ I �I E1651RIG Hoop owls U TO WE REFULFD WITH SHIELDED LU AA65 \ ---/ --- -T ---- --- T---- __--� r-- -t--- ��\---I----- -t---- I \ z( I I a �-t--- - �--� - - - - -----�-�---- / I BAMBINOS I t --- ----tom\-----1--+� -- ---� / I -I- --------I----\-----I--- �= a SURFACE - - , , , -----, HIE 24 I----- \-----)-----\ \ ----; s I \ I \ I A i ` Q 2 _ ______-_-- � l O IY /PNUCE ( \ I I I _ RISC noao / 1 / \ FUTURE \\ I \� I _�- -- TWE 1 ♦ TTPE 3r TTPE J / i 2 V I tlwletD aArr e 1 ?IS \ I ■MP LocWtm MOIIOLITNSC Elm 2\• MISP / e167ALL 1• NET TAP U �V 10' . Y _ \ Ift PIPE 1 SPACE i� e*r CQIPORA110I1 STOP. NICER 09-19 grAMAS CLNO STOP_-- ___=�_______________--_____------_______-VALVE Box `` \---- \�� \ �2 ` 4Ve� 213 INSTALL TAPPNG SLEEVE, I \\ \\ \ 1 TAPP VALVE ING VALVE AND ) \ HANDICAP z/6 07-U PTEI 2' P ___ \ - PAIgIG ff0/5 RAMP _ Ns.lo I \ ��I�°°�,[ - ---________________ ' 1 ONeI-1 I siloo o-9 / - G ° / FUTURE CEtTERUNE OF -=-=-c---__J/I r OUU PARKWAY \ 2\y / ` •=+� i I•---KSTAIL GRAVEL TURNAROUND AFTER ACCEPTANCE OF NEW ENTERPWSE i TYPE 1 ��- � +__ 21 f \ I R.O.W. OFFER AND PRIOR TO ACCEP ANCE OF ROADWAY BY TINE CITY. RAMP .-------- 20 it - r�••' .oVFe'?gpo�.•..'•�I G-F!3 91111WI10M0 AM) REVtrED FFTICE UTILITY & GRADING PLAN EAST CURVE a OF� N�.LpaEW�eRW.� R - _-_O'DELL PARK PCD 157.1S' Dev ADDED L - 111.56• GRAPHIC SCALE - Dale Ch'k'd Revision SOUTHBURLINGTON vFHIJONT SEE SHEET C-J FOR 21 20 0 10 20 b 60 1-4 4CL/MJW MAY, 1993 SHEET OUTLET RIFORMATION __ Dnwn by Date r-� to 999999w ," CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC- ...... n1N�....` Checked by DSM Scab r' . 20' C ( p fir) � '.: SHElffiaiE,V9iMOHT C-� _. _. Approved by 01m Proi ct No. 93108 __ _.- ITT� CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P. O. Box 485 (802) 985-2323 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 Fax No. (802) 985-2271 CHARLES R. DUNHAM President June 10, 1993 STEP viceHEN A. VOCK Vice President JEAN -CAROL DUNHAM Treasurer Mr. Ray Belair Zoning & Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: O'Dell Park PCD Final Plat Application Dear Mr. Belair: We have received the City Staff comments concerning the Final Plat Application for the O'Dell Park PCD to be located off of Shelburne Street and Farrell Street. We offer the following information and revisions to the plans in support of the Staff's recommendations: Planning Comments: 1. Catalog cuts on the proposed replacement lighting for bambino's is enclosed for your review. 2. The pavement marking placement detail found on Sheet C-7 has been revised to reflect the proposed 8' wide bike lane. 3. A Construction cost estimate was forwarded to you as part of the June 3, 1993 information package for this application. Minor revisions made to the site plan do not affect the estimate for tho Richt-of-Wa;• work. 4. The applicant has chosen to provide willow trees in lieu of the earlier proposed Austrian pines in the area between the Kochman and Pearson properties as shown on Sheet C-2. 5. The landscaping schedule on Sheet C-2 has been revised to depict the proper number of plantings. 6. The landscaping plan on Sheet C-2 has been revised to clearly indicate that the new row of white cedar near the mid point of the north property line will be a double row of trees and that one additional row of cedars is to be added across the access way (east end of north property line) to create a double row of trees. STUDIES • DESIGN • INSPECTION • TESTING SURVEYING 8 LAND DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULICS 8 HYDROLOGY SANITARY & WATER FOUNDATIONS 8 STRUCTURES CONCRETE 8 SOIL TESTING Mr. Ray Belair Page 2 June 10, 1993 7. A letter agreement with the City of Burlington concerning the proposed improvements to the Shelburne Street/Home Ave/O'Dell Parkway intersection should shortly be in hand and will be forwarded to you upon receipt. City Engineer's Comments: 1. The road gravel base thickness has been revised to indicate an 18" depth on the typical cross sections depicted on Sheet C-b. 2. The City lights to be located along the proposed O'Dell Parkway right-of-way as designed by Wolbach Engineering are one of two types of lighting fixtures that are acceptable and will be maintained by the Green Mountain Power Company. This is an acceptable condition of approval for this application. 3. On Sheet C-5 a temporary gravel turnaround is shown to be installed at the end of O'Dell Parkway prior to City acceptance of the roadway. The applicant acknowledges that he and not the City will be responsible for the maintenance of the roadway until it is accepted by the City. 4. Divisional island warning signs have been added on Sheet C-4. Speed Limit signs were previously indicated to be installed at stations 1+90 and 5+50 on Sheet C-4. 5. Sheet C-7 now includes a typical detail of the proposed divisional island to be installed at the O'Dell Parkway entrance. Fire Chief Comments: i , P1, n� C�?:.S:ue:� .'. ui4t:siciCtVij It should be noted that some revisions were made to the proposed parking lots to be located on the north and east sides of Bambino's. These revisions were completed to improve the water quality leaving the site by utilizing sheet flow over vegetated areas into grass lined swales. The relocated stockade fence on the north side of bambino's will remain on an earthen berm to minimize "over the top" visual impacts. A revision to the proposed parking layout abutting Shelburne Street was made to comply with the "no parking" stipulation of the Champlain Oil access easement. These spaces were relocated to northeast side of the Seaway Car Wash. The current proposal provides 111 spaces in the immediate area of the Ben Franklin and the Seaway Car Wash. Mr. Ray Belair Page 3 June 10, 1993 If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 985-2323 or James Lamphere at 655-5020. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, David S. Marshall Project Engineer DSM:pao Enclosures cc: J. Lamphere E5 Series up/Down Cutoff Tho optics provide rontrolled uptight and dewnlight with side Wolf. The same optics are also available for vertical mounting; add suffix'V, to Catalog number. (Shown here with gold color shroud opUon). E8 Series Deep Shielded Front brightness Shielding iS provided *ithoul sacril%ing wide light distribution. tt is ideal over entrances. (Sham with bronze Color shroud opti,m). up/Down Cutoff lOV;lip,,,, 10' mounting heighl. Deep Shielded 70W HPS. 20 mounting *ght. arm =Ewuvw/■.r o .v. vv ■■ ■■mw• i■■• ■■w■PR: .■�r M■�■'1�.•./PPS mintp m—m—OR■wS��fl■ a C■ _ � ■j �`.■■■IAAw\ /er•+ w�Z���w-�■Iw���r r.�P�fwir w�.•rf=■ i� u.w�waE� �'1 r■w uc�.r■ // /P14w.•.raw��Ak.. NJ \■■. ■■A■■1■�AA■.■■.■r�.■.P ■SF='■��Illlr got 2, � MINI �7� ■fA. ...fC�.iP9wOP11 �tllil�P*r.ii.ov■..�rgv'• iMiw���,■�■f■•►11w.na/��iM• RM7F1"m ..1: rwr.I." ^tl•YMT�■ •��%I.t1�■r wr■P.r■■.wPww9r ■■ ■.■■iP•`�lAw.'f^Y.11 /'.. w:•! �w.■..w. r..w... �....r". 7. ••1r�Pww7MP4PP■ .•.(('I •M 1V •�•:. .wrwf..■wa�1..P7rr•■■.w�n� .P •.■..■ ■�1•.�'J�.4u:..�l' ■PPr ■■■ww.4 MM.rr11.P0':n. .^wPw..:./r'.MS■wr�.PPor■o1MPrwrwq.P".::rs ■ Post -it", brand fax van'smitt'al merno 7671 EfPaages ► � Frofn Dept, hdne M ��r ti l v Fax M_ Fax N - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _. - - - - _. i Wu gltfi' iu L • J� •` �� a Order r r Ballast/ Catalog Mounting Description Lamp Number Posillon Perimeter sow MH E3405-0 Wall Downlipht Cutoff low IAH E3407-0 Wall Downli�hl kW HPS E3503-11 Any 50w HPS E35M-1 Any )OW HPS E3507-1 Any 100W HPS E3510.1 _ Wall Downllphl Projection Sow MH E4405.0 wall Down fight _ Cutoff 7OW MH E4407-D Wall Downlighl W35WHPS E4503-1 Any 5ow'tips E4505.1 Any 70W HPS E4507-1 WSiI Oownlight Voltage Suffix Key: (aee Opllons br ava0abiliity) 1.120V 2 - 277V 3.208V 4.240V e , 347V D. Dual -tap: in U.S.1201277V; In Canada SOW MH-120/277V; 701N MH-120/347V Options; (la,lnry-Inslallod) Description Change Sulflx To Add After Suffix 208 Von ballast (Hp. nn!y) 3 240 Van bellasl (HPS ONY) 4 _ 277 Von ballast (Nr; nmy) 2 347 Volt ballast (10 S IOOw 11PS oNy) ti High Power Factor ballatl H Pnolocell^ _ vcltaga surfix P eronre Color stiinud _ BS Gold Color Shroud " GS Vertirral Mounting (E3 $eres cnty) V Tamperprool hens Faslerters J Accessories: (Ileld•lnslalled) (ESA-7 picrurtd on page 21) Description Catalog Number Surlact Mounting Box ES6.7 Tampelproof Screwdriver TPS•1 Lamp included with fixture. E3 Series Perimeter Cutoff The reflector directs light downward to wash the wall below and to the sides at the f eve. The wide distri- bulion permits maximum spacing tetneen tlxturss The Sams oplics mounting, aoa sullix'V to o;talog number. E4 Series Projection Cutoff The refector projects light out and away from the fixture. An excellent choice for lighting small parking or public areas next to buildings, Perimeter Cutoff 701N HPS, 15' mounting height. si 2 In unh Of Mounting Multipliers Helghi th.) Mu111&,1er 8' 4. 10' 2. -- 0.44 25' — —0,33 f 3.46 Til f NOTE: i For tAH 4nd 100W Dimension Is 7.+2' , d +, iE Dimension la 3 0' fi •' ''- Projection Cutoff 70W HPS,15' mounting height, glean in Unee Of Wloo4np Hirgnt Mounting Multipliers Height (K.) Multiplier 8' 4.00 10' 58 12' 8 15' 20' 0.33 RUUDQuality far iess when ynu buy direct_ Toil Free U.S. 800 236-7000 LiGHTIN(:3 Toll Free Canada 800473-1234 - - - t, _i - - - - _- - - _fif -`- - 4 - - - - - - , - , -- - - -- - I f - - ` ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .- - - - - - - -_ - - - - - - - _ - _. - - . - - Preliminary Memo - Planning June 22, 1993 agenda items June 3, 1993 Page 2 A. MARCELINO - SITE REVISIONS/OFFICE EXPANSION SITE PLAN --- front yard coverage must not exceed 30%. Staff calculates front yard coverage to be 53%. Plan must be revised to comply with this requirement. --- the applicant needs to demonstrate that there has been a change in conditions to justify the requested changes and to justify the Planning Commission's reconsideration of the site changes. This issue should be addressed in writing and submitted to staff. --- provide exterior lighting details. --- plans should indicate that project is located at 20 Palmer Court not 4050 Williston Road. --- staff calculates existing and proposed landscaping to be $800 short of the $3600 required. Additional plantings should be proposed to meet the minimum requirement. RALPH GOODRICH- OFFICE BUILDING - SITE PLAN --- applicant should provide building elevations for all four (4) sides showing both pre -construction and post -construction grades. --- it is staff 's position that the access to the project is within 300 feet of the Hinesburg Road/Kennedy Drive intersection. The property is therefore subject to the traffic limitations of Traffic Overlay Zone 1 which limits P.M. peak hour trip ends to 23. The proposed 26,000 square foot office building is estimated to generate 68.9 trip ends. Since the number of proposed trip ends far exceeds the number permitted, staff recommends that this project not be approved by the Planning Commission. --- staff suggests that the project be scaled back to not exceed the trip end limit, relocate the access at least 13 feet further away from the intersection to then be in Traffic Overlay Zone 5 or change the proposed use to one that doesn't generate so much traffic such as residential. FARRELL - DRIVE -UP BANK - O'DELL PARKWAY - FINAL PLAT --- submit catalog cuts on the replacement huildinr_r mn„ntorl lighting. --- pavement marking placement detail on sheet C-7 does not take into account the bike lane. Preliminary Memo - Planning June 22, 1993 agenda items June 3, 1993 Page 3 --- construction cost estimates for all improvements within the future street r.o.w. should be submitted. --- staff recommends that the 36 Austrian Pines proposed to be located between the Kochman and Pearson properties be planted along the south side of the residential properties to create a more dense visual barrier. --- the landscaping schedule indicates that only 20 Austrian Pine are proposed but the plan shows 36 trees proposed. --- the plan should clearly indicate that the new row of white cedar is a double row of trees and that one (1) additional row of cedar is added accross teh r.o.w. to make a double row. --- applicant must submit a letter of agreement from the City of Burlington for the intersection improvements. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: Preliminary Comments June 22, 1993 agenda items Date: June 1, 1993 O'DELL PARK OFF SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Road gravel base shall have a thickness of 18 inches not 14 as plans show. The details on page C-7 do show the gravel base as 18 inches. 2. City street lights shall be acceptable to Green Mountain Power who will maintain them. 3. O'Dell Parkway must terminate with a gravel turnaround for maintenance vehicles especially plow trucks. The entrance to Bambino's is not adequate for that purpose. 4. Island and speed signs shall be installed. 5. Plan should show a detail of the traffic island. It shall be concrete. MARCELINO COMPANY, 4050 WILLISTON ROAD (PALMER CIRCLE 1. Plan SPL revised 4/30/93 prepared by Gordon Woods is acceptable. PROVENCHER SUBDIVISION, CENTRAL AVENUE The 5 foot easement should be restricted as to use so as not to interfere with the maintenance of that side of house number 41. JUDGE DEVELOPMENT, 100 DORSET STREET Plan prepared by Dunn Associates dated March 1992 is acceptable. TO; FROM; DATE; RE; I 2 IN 4. SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF GODDETTE WEDNESDAY MAY 26,1993 TUESDAY JUNE 22,1993 AGENDA ITEMS MARY M. PREVENCHER PROPERTY LOT #41 & # 43 2-LOT SUB -DIVISION QUEEN CITY PAX, Al fH1S LIME I DO NOI SEE A PROBLEM WITH THE: 2-LUI SUB -DIVISION WHICH WOULD CHANGE OUR SERVICE. A. MARCELINO CO. INC. 4050 WILLISTON RD. PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED ON THE PARKING AREA AND DO NOT FEEL IT WILL CHANGE EMERGENCY SERVICE. AS FAR AS THE CHANGES INSIDE THE BUILDING MR. MARCELINO 15 REUUIRED TO FILE PLANS WITH THE DEPT. OF LAPOP AND INDUSTRY TO MAKE SURE THE CHANGES MEET STATE CODE FOR SAFETY. R.B.G. OFFICE BUILDING 625 HINESBURG ROAD THE PLANS WERE REVIEWED BY THIS OFFICE AND THE FOLLOWING MUST BE CORRECTED FOR EMERGENCI PROTECTION; A. ONE HYDRANT TO BE ADDED AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY THIS OFFICE. B. THE BUILDING OVER PARKING AREA MUST BE 1.4 FOOT HIGH TO ALLOW EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT UNDER IF NEEDED TO GET AROUND BUILDING. O'DELL PKWAY PROPERTY PROJECT # 93108 PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND AT THIS TIME ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE FOR EMERGENCY PROTECTION. 5. 100 DORSET STREET JUDGE DEVELOPMENT CORP. PLAN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND THE FOLLOWING CHANGES ARE NEEDED; A. HYDRANT ON SOUTH END OF PROPERTY ON DORSF_T APPROVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT. r ri r l-Mmm i 1& i U Do 1 0 1 HOUt_U UN I "w .ir+UN vi u_ OF THE PROPERTY BETWEEN THE TWO HUTIDTNPq AT A LUCAi!ON APPROVED BY THIS OFFICE. THE PLAN FOR THE OFFICE BUILDING ON CORPORATF WAY WHICH TS PART OF THIS PROPERTY MAY HAVE A HYDRANT WHICH IS PART OF BOTH PROJECTS.