Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 1200 Airport Drive (2), :k � ��::a�,�"_,,tl"y,��i�"'^ixCl.�..++�..�i �+, ' -D:. � r"-.; � t „w,,,,�,;.i.• �8 l ' _a CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlington airport\garage expansion.doc Burlington International Airport, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking approval to construct two (2) additional parking levels to an existing two (2) level parking garage to accommodate 1370 vehicles, 1200 Airport Drive. The Board held a meeting on August 18, 2009 to discuss the application and continued the discussions until September 15, 2009 so that the applicant and staff could address traffic and pedestrian circulation. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Raymond Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans and have the following comments: ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS The expansion to the garage is predominantly vertical: the addition will result in additional 75 square feet of footprint. Given the hundreds of acres on the site, the 75 square feet will not affect even a fraction of a percentage of impervious coverage. As such, the property's adherence to the dimensional requirements of the district will not change. The proposed changes in height are addressed below in this report. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The purpose of the additional parking levels is to meet what the applicant states is an established need for more on -site parking by providing an additional 1370 parking spaces. Staff recommends that the applicant provide a parking needs assessment. The applicant should also provide information as to what is being done to reduce the need for parking. 1. The applicant should provide a parking needs assessment which addresses the current and future need for parking. The applicant shall also discuss what is being done to reduce the need for parking on site. Access to the garage and circulation in the vicinity will remain unchanged: vehicles will access the airport property at the southern drive. Access to the garage remains just north of the main terminal. Garage exits, access for rental cars, and general exit from the airport remain unchanged. The layout of the proposed project continues provides for safe pedestrian movement. There is an existing sidewalk through the access drives which is substantially signed for pedestrian safety. There is also an enclosed bridge which connects the parking structure to the terminal. Pedestrian access to the garage is also provided in two points from the recreation path along Airport Drive. 5 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlington airport\garage expansion.doc Staff has conducted a site visit with the applicant's traffic engineer and has discovered that there are no crosswalks across Airport Drive to connect the two sides of the road anywhere near the vicinity of the airport. However, they appear to be out of place. The applicant should revise their plan to examine the adequacy of number and location of these crosswalks. 2. The plans shall be revised to include details for appropriate pedestrian connections across Airport Drive. This should at least include adequate striping, but perhaps also additional signage, lit and unlit. The applicant should work with the Director of Public Works on this matter. The applicant should also address the circulation and traffic pattern within the garage. The existing circulation is not ideal and there are some concerns that an addition would only exacerbate this problem. 3. The applicant shall address the circulation and traffic flow pattern within the structure. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The general location of the parking remains unchanged. The existing parking structure was sited several years ago. It would be impractical to locate an additional structure in a different location than where one already exists. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The existing structure is 36'8" in height. The roof of the top level of the addition will reach 57'6". The top of the coping at the stairwells will reach 69'6". The top of the stair tower with the cellular antenna will reach 77'. The applicant is also proposing small wind turbines (11'6" high) atop the proposed garage which would reach a maximum height of 88'6" above ground level. The applicant has stated that the wind turbines will be connected to the grid. As such they are exempt from local review. Therefore, the applicant is seeking a maximum height of 77 feet. As the maximum height for a flat roofed building is 35 feet, this would require a height waiver of 42 feet. 4. The Board grants a height waiver of 42 feet, for a height of 77'0" for the top of the antenna and a height waiver of 346" for a height of 696" for the top of stair towers and a height waiver of 226" for a height of 576" the roof of the top deck. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. 4. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. Staff believes that this requirement is being met through the proposed project. The applicant is proposing to continue the materials and architectural style (arched fagade with columns along the parking decks). l CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drblsit\burlington airport\garage exgansion.doc (f) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. Staff feels the proposed structure relates harmoniously to the existing garage. Furthermore, the applicant is proposing a roof on the top level of the parking garage with 11.3% of the area being green area available for seasonal public access. The remaining 88.7% of the roof is proposed to be used for photovoltaic panels to generate power. Site plan applications shall meet the followina specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to create any additional access points to the properties that abut the subject property. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). There are no additional trash facilities proposed as a result of the proposed project. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements Pursuant to Table 13-9 of the Land Development Regulations, the minimum landscaping requirement for the proposed expansion is $361,390. The applicant is proposing a green roof on a portion of the top level of the structure. The itemized totals for this roof total $664,988. Staff has been working with the applicant to determine which of the items included in this budget shall be counted towards the landscaping minimum. There are certainly some components that achieve the goals specified in the SBLDR towards screening, aesthetic, and environmental values of landscaping. It is also unclear which, if any, of the proposed items are actual plants. As the landscape architect was unavailable at the time of this report due to vacation, staff will continue to work towards this goal. Staff is reasonably confident that it can be met. 5. The applicant shall work with the Staff and the City Arborist to ensure that the plan meets the minimum landscaping requirement. The applicant is also proposing to remove and transplant or replace some existing trees which l CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sitlburlington airport\garage expansion.doc will be impacted as a result of the construction. The City Arborist has reviewed the plans and has stated that he has no comments on this portion of the plan. 6. The City Arborist shall review the plans and provide comments. If necessary, the plans should be revised accordingly. Lighting The lighting proposed by the applicant is adequate with respect to allowable lighting fixtures. The proposed fixtures are in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations, and are full cut-off fixtures; The applicant has submitted a point by point plan for the lighting on the roof as well as photo simulations which depict the proposed building after dark. It is still not clear however to what extent the new addition and additional lighting fixtures will result in lighting levels spilling over the airport property lines. The applicant should address this at the hearing. A lighting point by point plan should be submitted which reaches the property line and depicts any lighting which extends beyond it. If necessary, staff advises a technical review of the proposed lighting. 7. The applicant shall submit a complete lighting point by point plan prior to site plan approval. They shall address any occurrences of lighting spillover onto adjacent streets or properties. The "hot spot" of lighting bulbs shall not be visible. Traffic The applicant has submitted a detailed traffic study. The Board invoked a technical review of this traffic study by a third party traffic consultant. This review has been completed but only received today. There are issues which must be addressed by the applicant. 8. The plans shall be reviewed by a third party traffic consultant. Where necessary, the applicant shall address and implement suggested changes. Other The City Engineer is reviewing the plans but has not yet provided written comments. The City Engineer should have comments prior to completion of the other necessary items already specified in this report. 9. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Engineer. Where necessary, plans shall be revised. Bicycle racks and similar facilities for pedestrian or alternative travel should be addressed through the parking needs assessment. The applicant has not addressed how snow will be removed from the garage or if it will be stored on site. 10. The applicant shall address snow removal and storage. The South Burlington Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and has voiced concerns about adequacy of communication within the structure (see attached letter dated August 5, 2009). This CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlington airporkarage expansion.doc should be addressed prior to approval so as not to further exacerbate an already dangerous issue. 11. The applicant shall work with the South Burlington Fire Department to ensure adequate and safe communication throughout the structure. A plan shall be approved by the Chief prior to site plan approval. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board continue Site Plan application #SP-09-63 subject to questions regarding the landscaping of the green roof and a technical review of traffic, and conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document. Respectfully submitted, ath a- a Rose, Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose From: ray Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 10:41 AM To: Cathyann LaRose Subject: FW: Burlington Airport Parking Garage Traffic Circulation Questions We should include this in the packet. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 802-846-4106 From: Leinwohl, Jon[mailto:jon.leinwohl@stantec.com] Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 10:42 AM To: ray Cc: Robert McEwing; Bradford J Worthen; Kevin Racek Subject: Burlington Airport Parking Garage Traffic Circulation Questions Ray, At the Aug 24th DRB meeting, concerns were expressed about traffic circulation in the existing garage, and if circulation will be adversely affected by the expansion. In response, we offer the following: 1. The National Parking Association publishes guidelines for parking garage design. These were referenced during design and followed where applicable. 2. There are two ramps in the existing garage and these will be expanded to serve the new floors. One ramp is used primarily by the public and the second by airport employees and rental car operations. The original garage design was dictated by the placement of the public ramp. The thought was this ramp should not be located on the Terminal side as this would make traffic circulation difficult and a greater number of pedestrians would need to cross the ramp to reach the Terminal. 3. The Airport recognizes that signing in the parking garage can be improved to help drivers and pedestrians find their way. The design team is developing a signing plan to address this issue. Elements include lighted directional signage and increased lighting at ramp and high circulation areas. Also, distinct way finding signage will be provided at elevators and stair towers. 4. Four toll booths presently serve the parking garage. Two of these booths are operated by attendants and two are used exclusively by credit card and/or pass holders. The two unattended booths are significantly under utilized and can be reconfigured to accommodate the additional proposed parking spaces. It is also noted that significant queuing capacity exists within the garage for peak periods that coincide with arrival of larger flights. Jon Leinwohl, P.E. Associate, Transportation Stantec 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington VT 05403 Ph: (802) 864-0223 Ext 110 Fx: (802) 864-0165 Cell: (802) 734-0446 lon.leinwohl@stantec.com stantec.com The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately. ® Please consider the environment before printing this email. 9/11/2009 29 /O r-4thO��� southburlington PLANNING & ZONING DRAFT AGENDA South Burlington Development Review Board Tuesday, May 4, 2010 7:30pm Regular Meeting City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 1. Other business/announcements 2. Minutes of April 6 and April 20, 2010. 3. Consent Agenda 4. Preliminary and final plat application #SD-10-13 of the University of Vermont for a planned unit development to construct a 275' x 600' track (only a portion of which is located in South Burlington), 147 Spear Street. 5. Miscellaneous application #MS-10-04 of Claudia Berger and Sheldon Katz for approval to expand a non -complying single family dwelling by: 1) enclosing existing front porch, 2) constructing 6' x 10' covered front porch, 3) converting rear deck to 2-story addition, 4) adding 8' x 12.5' screened in rear deck, and 5) adding two (2) shed dormers, 54 Central Avenue. 6. Sketch plan application #SD-10-14 of Donald G. Winnett and Gloria Davis for a planned unit development to subdivide a 12,100 sq. ft. lot developed with a two-family dwelling into two (2) footprint lots of 1,190 sq. ft. and a 9,720 sq. ft. remaining lot, 12-14 Wright Court. 7. Continued final plat application #SD-10-10 of Wedgewood Development Corp. for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) six two-family dwellings, and 2) three (3) single family lots, 232 Autumn Hill Road. 8. Continued preliminary plat application #SD-09-51 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC for a planned unit development to construct a 50,000 sq. ft. office building, 119 Tilley Drive. 9. Site plan review application #SP-10-28 to amend a previously approved plan for a two (2) level addition to a three (3) level parking garage. The amendment consists of: 1) construction of a temporary public exit at the south end of parking garage, and 2) utilizing airport property on Kirby Road Extension for temporary tree storage and storage of 800 cubic yards of topsoil, 1200 Airport Drive. Respectfully Submitted, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com ►ice• e south urf in ton PLANNING & ZONING April 23, 2010 Re: Burlington International Airport (Agenda Item #9) Dear Property Owner: On the back of this letter is a copy of the draft agenda for the May 4, 2010 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. The agenda includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846- 4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com � r BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Committed to Excellence in Service 1200 AIRPORT DRIVE, #1 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802)-863-2874 (TDD) FAX: (802)-863-7947 DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL SHEET DATE: May 7, 2010 TO: Ray Belair, So. Burlington Planning & Zoning FROM: Bob McEwing RE: Parking Garage Zoning Permit COMMENTS: Hi Ray: Here are some documents/checks related to the parking structure project. --Zoning Permit application with check for $74,053 (includes $13 for recording). --Traffic impact fee check for $136,981 --Williston Rd/Airport Drive intersection contribution check of $63,473. Letters of Credit have been signed by the City and should be coming from BankNorth within the next few days. If may come directly to your office. If so, would you please make a copy for our files. Thanks Have a good weekend. Bob McEwing 9RAI 1 i--, south u fronton PLANNING & ZONING August 31, 2011 Re: #SP-11-37 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. k J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com { l Permit Number SP- - CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Cityo Burlington, Burlin>ton International Airport, 1200 Airport Drive, #1, South Burlington, VT 05403, Phone: 802-863-2874. Fax: 802-863-7947 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 13, Pam 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same as 1 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax ft Heather Kendrew, PE, Director of Maintenance, Engineering, & Environment; e-mail: hkendrewgbtv.aero; Mailing address, phone, and fax # same as 1) Jon Leinwohl, P.E., Stantec Consulting, 55 Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403; e-mail: 'on.leinwohl(aD-stantec.com: Phone: 802-864-0223, x 110-, Fax: 802-864-0165 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1200 Airport Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 2000 OOOOC 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Back round.• a. Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 was approved by the Development Review Board (DRB) on December 16, 2009. This granted approval for the applicant to construct two additional parking levels over the existing three level parking garage located at 1200 Airport Drive. b. Site Application #SP-10-05 was approved by the DRB on February 2, 2010. This granted approval to construct the garage expansion in two phases. c. Site Plan Application #SP-10-28 was approved by the DRB on May 7, 2010. This approved constructing, a temporary public exit at the south end of the existing parking garage during the garage construction. This also approved the use of Airport owned property on the south side of Kirby Road for temporary tree storage and storage of topsoil during related to the garage expansion construction. Present application: This application addresses two changes to the previous Site Plan approvals for the parking garage expansion. l . The location of the southerly most proposed crosswalk on Airport Drive will be shifted northerly approximately 375 feet from the previously approved location. This change is based on discussions with the City of South Burlington Director of Public Works. As a result of shifting the crosswalk location, approximately 375 feet of proposed sidewalk along the easterly side of Airport Drive will not be required and will be deleted from the project. 2. There were several changes to the location of trees replanted on the east, west and north sides of the parking garage after those trees were moved and stored off -site. Crane access to construct two additional floors at the north end of the gara e required the move. A total of 55 trees were proposed to be transplanted, stored off -site and replanted. Between the time the plan was approved and the start of construction, it was determined that 15 trees on the original list did not need to be moved because it would not be necessary to set the crane up in the places where those trees were located. In addition, 5 other trees needed to be moved because the crane required more maneuvering space than originally anticipated. Four trees and a shrub were not returned to the site: • (1) 4 in. caliper Callery Pear. The tree was never moved to the nursery. It was deemed too dangerous to dig because of its proximity to an existing utility line. It was removed and replaced with (2) 2 in. caliper Callery Pears. • (2) 12 ft. Austrian Pines had been in poor condition prior to the move. Their appearance did not improve at the nursery. They were not returned to the site because they would detract rather than enhance the new work. • (1) 5 in. caliper crabapple. (Same note as Austrian Pines) • (1) Lilac (Same note as Austrian Pines). This shrub was located just north of the employee entrance driveway on Airport Parkway. One of the new NorwaySpruce trees was set in place of the Lilac to extend the evergreen screen between Airport Drive and the employee parking lot. Other trees that were relocated: • (2) 5-6 in. caliper Norwav Maples originally were located on the west side of the garage close to existing 24 in. caliper trees with broad canopies. The Maples were replanted on the east side of the garage where there are no large trees. Their relatively large size lessens the visual impact of the high garage structure as seen from the relatively narrow public exit corridor in that area. { • (3 rr 3 in. caliper Hackbeys were originally located on the east side of the garage. They were replanted on the west to allow space for the Norway Maples. • Austrian Pines of various sizes and Callery Pears were re -spaced and mixed on both east and west sides. The trees were located to accommodate a gas line running down the center of the planting area on the east side of the garage. They were also reconfigured to accommodate for their additional rg owth. • (2) large white pines were transplanted from the west side of the garage and replanted, one on the west, one on the east. The largest was located at a prominent location just off the northeast corner of the garage 21 new evergreen trees were specified to be planted. All those trees are installed. They include; • (8) Norway Spruce — 6-8 ft. height • (3) Austrian Pine — 6-8 ft. height • (10) Eastern White Pine — 6-8 ft. height. The Pines were planted at 8-10 ft. height. The value for a 6-8 ft. height Eastern White Pine is $300/each, a 8-10 ft. height is $550/each, so the overall increased value is $550 - $300 = $250/each x (10) = $2,500. a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) No change from previous approvals. b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) No change from previous approvals. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Existing and proposed building square footage: No change from previous approvals; no additional buildings are proposed under this amendment. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) No change from previous approvals. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not applicable. f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): No change from previous approvals. { g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 942 acres = 41,033,520Sq. Ft. No change from previous approvals. a) Building: Existing Unknown % / sq. ft. Proposed 0 % added (all expansion is vertical) / sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing Unknown % / sq. ft. Proposed 0% added / sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 29.3 % / sq. ft. Proposed 0 % added / sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 14,500 sq. ft.* (0.33 acres) no additional disturbance under this application. * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): No change from previous approvals. b) Landscaping: See attached from Michaels Lawrence regarding landscapin costs. c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): No change from previous approvals. Total project cost: No change from previous approvals. 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): No change from previous approvals. b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): See 10 a). c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): See 10 a). { 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: See 10 a . 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: See l0 a . 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: November 2011 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) A list of abutting property owners and stamped, addressed envelopes are attached. 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNA RE LICANT SIGNATURE OF j'ROPE&1W O ER 747 Do not write below this line 0 DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Boardnistrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: mple Incomplete, % ^ of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date Michael Lawrence Associates Landscape Architects / Site Planning Consultants July 19, 2011 Mr. Ray Belair City of South Burlington Office of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE; Burlington International Airport PARKING GARAGE ADDITION Value change in landscaping plans to as -built installation Value of trees left in nursery; SINcie # size condition value Crabapple 1 4" cal. poor $ 0 Austrian Pine 2 10 ft. ht. poor $ 0 Lilac 4 6 ft. ht. poor $ 0 Value of White Pines specified; Specie # s ize per total White Pines 10 6-8 ft. ht. $285/ea $2,850 Value of White Pines installed; Specie # size per total White Pines 10 8-10 ft. ht. $530/ea $5,300 MEMBER Eight Linden Lane Essex Junction, Vermont, 05452 American Society PH/FAX 802-878-2778 C 802-578-9591 of Landscape Architects mike@mclasla.com l `- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 4 MAY 2010 PAGE 4 Changes since preliminary plat include: A. light fixture changed to LED fixture B. sidewalk continued to Unit #8 C. on the front road, the terminal to the private street has been changed and a paved walk added. Mr. Burke said there is a question of getting a building permit within 6 months because they will need Act 250 approval. Ms. LaRose said it will be easy to get an extension. Mr. Burke said they are not proposing sprinklers in the single family homes. The Fire Chief said he wouldn't recommend non-sprinklered homes. His stand is that if it's a private road, houses need to have sprinklers, and that is a "line drawn in the sand." Mr. Dinklage suggested approving the application with sprinklers, and if the applicants can convince the Fire Chief, they can always come back to the Board.. Mr. Belair noted that a condition will be added relative to variety in building facades, per p. 10 of the staff comments. The question was raised as to the Board's position on waiving the requirement for 35% translucent windows oriented to the south. Members felt orientation to the street was more important. The approval motion was amended to add the word " easement" after the word "path" in Condition #6. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-10-10 of Wedgewood Development Corp. subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Continued Preliminary Plat application #SD-09-51 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, for a planned unit development to construct a 50,000 sq. ft. office building,119 Tilley Drive: Mr. Belair advised that the applicant had asked for a continuance until 18 May. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Preliminary Plat application #SD-09-51 of Pizzagalli Properties until 18 May 2010. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Site Plan Review Application #SP-10-28 of City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport to amend a previously approved plan for a two -level addition to the three -level parking garage. The amendment consists of. 1) construction of a temporary public exit at the south end of parking garage; and 2) utilizing airport property on Kirby Road Extension for temporary tree storage and storage of 800 cubic yards of topsoil,1200 Airport Drive: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 4 MAY 2010 PAGE 5 International Airport to amend a previously approved plan for a two -level addition to the three -level parking garage. The amendment consists of: 1) construction of a temporary public exit at the south end of parking garage; and 2) utilizing airport property on Kirby Road Extension for temporary tree storage and storage of 800 cubic yards of topsoil, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Leinwohl said the temporary exit would be at the south end of the parking garage during Phase I construction. This would make access safer and will facilitate construction. This is the same location as the temporary exit during the 2003 project, and it worked fine then. Two lights will be moved to be sure the area is well lighted. Mr. Belair said staff has no issue with the access. Mr. Leinwohl said they are also asking to store trees that are being moved at a location on Kirby Road until next June. They would also store some saved topsoil for about a year. Mr. Belair noted that the topsoil storage area is where the Dog Park is being proposed. Mr. McEwing said this is another place the topsoil can be stored on the opposite side of the road. The Airport owns all of that property, and no one is living in the area. The approval motion was amended to indicate that the storage area for topsoil is on the north site of Kirby Road Extension. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-10-28 of City of Burlington/ Burlington International Airport subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m. Clerl b o U Date FAIN, :1t00101W1W southburlington PLANNING & ZONING May 7, 2010 Jon Leinwohl 1200 Airport Drive, Suite 1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Airport Storage Dear Mr. Leinwohl: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Development Review Board on May 4, 2010 (effective 5/4/10). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning and Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT: 7009 0080 0001 4397 5636 A 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com Ilk south PLANNING & ZONING May 7, 2010 David Young 15 Dover Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Airport Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beaqley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. u 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com south., PLANNING & ZONING May 7, 2010 Robert McEwing 1200 Airport Drive, Suite 1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Airport Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beaqley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846 4106 fax 802,846 4101 www.sburl corn h ... 71'. Interested Persons Record and Service List southhurfingto �E P;1p MT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achielve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY, NAME j 21-6/ -0 MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST 6i•> c.ccGJGi6i-fC. So, c�E�DZ�waT�-�, V7— A.Rg427 wfi�� IVM southburfingt n V FR MD 47 Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: V PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST (St rG, 1 1 Zoe -Ft9nn A-qc .. biv k� n � 0� 1 �� c / z zz 9� e,�i'� 67 ZzZZ 07 /� J c7 sC-li C r' So Vr o y YC3 I q 4- S i3v� o r D�Pu�JI - 41ihi/1'y`�b�vr�� I AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408 NOTICE: DRAFT DISCHARGE PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: April 14, 2010 — May 13, 2010 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAME PERMITTEE ADDRESS PERMIT NUMBER PROJECT ID NUMBER: DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated stormwater VOLUME: As necessary City, of Burlington, Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 3028-INDS.1 EJ96-0386 RECEIVING WATER: Unnamed tributaries of the Winooski River, Muddy Brook, and to groundwater in the unnamed tributary to the Winooski River watershed and to groundwater in the Muddy Brook watershed. EXPIRATION DATE: Five years from issuance date of final permit DESCRIPTION: This is a draft discharge permit proposed for issuance to the City of Burlington, Burlington International Airport for the discharge of stormwater runoff from BTV Reconstruct. Mark & Groove Runway 15- 33: AIP No. 3-50-0005-XX located in South Burlington, Vermont to unnamed tributaries of the Winooski River, Muddy Brook, and to groundwater in the unnamed tributary to the Winooski River watershed and to groundwater in the Muddy Brook watershed.. The means of treatment includes diconnected overland flow, dry swale, and underground UVLl.11ll VlU llllll 110.l1 V11 CLl l,0.J. TENTATIVE DETERMINATIONS Tentative determinations regarding effluent limitations and other conditions to be imposed on the pending Vermont permit have been made by the State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources (VANR). The limitations imposed will assure that the Vermont Water Quality Standards and applicable provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act, PL 92-500, as amended, will be met. -2- FURTHER INFORMATION The complete application, proposed permit, and other information are on file and may be inspected at the VANR, Waterbury Office. Copies, obtained by calling (802) 241-3770, will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS Written public comments on the proposed permit are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) May 13, 2010, by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408 or send via email to Stormwatera state. vt. us. If sending by mail, the permit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any submitted comments. If sending by e-mail, the permit number should appear on the subject line. All comments received by the above date will be considered in formulation of the final determinations. During the notice period, any person may submit a written request to this office for a public hearing to consider the proposed permit. The request must state the interest of the party filing such request and the reasons why a hearing is warranted. A hearing will be held if there is a significant public interest (including the filing of requests or petitions for such hearing) in holding such a hearing. GHTS TO APPEAL TO ENVIRONMENTAL COURT At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or to deny the permit. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $250.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vermontjudiciary.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. 4 802-828-1660). Justin G. Johnson, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation ZO, NX, AL- «s •y." � ��"+ate'^ ••r y,�Y' x-►'1-'r�y•" ,�y •*; �� " �' vy Sq v rr CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlington airport\TemporaryExit doc The City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan approval to amend a previously approved plan for a two (2) level addition to a three (3) level parking garage. The amendment consists of: 1) construction of a temporary public exit at the south end of parking garage, and 2) utilizing airport property on Kirby Road Extension for temporary tree storage and storage of 800 cubic yards of topsoil, 1200 Airport Drive. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans and has the following comments: ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS The subject property is over 1000 acres. The temporary access and soil storage will have a very negligible effect on any dimensional requirements or limitations. Staff notes that the entire site is still well within limitations for the district. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The applicant is proposing to construct a temporary public exit to be located at the south end of the existing parking garage. This exit will be needed to provide an efficient flow of traffic exiting the garage during construction of the (previously approved) addition. The applicant states that it will also promote safety by separating public traffic from the construction work zone. The applicant has stated that the temporary exit is proposed to be used from mid -May through November 30, 2010, with restoration of the exit completed by the Spring of 2011. The exit will require a temporary curb cut on Airport Drive to be located across from Patrick Street. It should be noted that this same temporary exit was used during the construction of the parking garage expansion in 2003. Staff has spoken to multiple departments and the City Manager's Office. There were no issues with the temporary use at that time and so none are expected now. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. CI CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlington airport\TemporarvExit doc (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. (fJ Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. As no new buildings are proposed, these criteria are not applicable. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to create any additional access points to the properties that abut the subject property. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). No additional dumpsters will result from the proposed changes. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements As no new construction is proposed, this criterion is not applicable to this application. Lighting The applicant has not proposed any additional lighting. If at any point the applicant desires additional lighting, they shall need to apply to the Development Review Board for such. Traffic The proposed changes will not generate any additional P.M. peak -hour vehicle trip ends. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sitlburlington airport\TemporarvExit doc Tree Storage/SoM Storage Staff has no problems with the proposed tree and soil storage. The site should be brought back to existing grade and adequately repaired and reseeded at the termination of construction. 9. The areas which are proposed for temporary uses, re -construction, and soil and tree storage shall be returned to their original condition RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Site Plan application #SP-10-28. Res ctfully submitted, i Cathyann aRose, AICP, Associate Planner Copy to: Robert McEwing, BIA John Leinwohl, Stantec Permit Number SP- 10 -- 19 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Cily o Burlington, Burlington International Airport, 1200 Airport Drive, #1, South Burlington, VT 05403, Phone: 802-863-2874, Fax: 802-863-7947 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 13, Page 271 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same as 1 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Robert A. McEwing, Director of Planning & Development; e-mail: RMcewingL&btv.aero; Mailing address, Rhone, and fax # same as 1) Jon Leinwohl, P.E., Stantec Consulting, 55 Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403; e-mail: Phone: 802-864-0223, x 110; Fax: 802-864-0165 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1200 Airport Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 2000 OOOOC 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Background: Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 was approved by the Development Review Board (DRB) on December 16, 2009. This granted approval for the applicant to construct two additional parking levels over the existing three level parking garage located at 1200 Airport Drive. Site Application #SP-10-05 was approved by the DRB on February 2, 2010. This amended the original approval to construct the project in two phases. The February 2, 2010 approval is herein referred to as Amendment # 1. Amendment #2 Request: This application requests further amendment of the Parking Garage Expansion Site Plan to include the following: 1. Construction of a temporary public exit to be located at the south end of the existing parking_garage. This exit is needed to provide an efficient flow of traffic exiting the garage during_ construction and to promote public safety by helping to separate public traffic from the construction work zone. The temporary exit will be used from mid -May through Nov 30, 2010. Restoration of the exit will be completed in the Spring of 2011. The exit will require a temporary curb cut on Airport Drive to be located across from Patrick Street. See attached plans for details. It is noted that a temporary exit in the same location was used successfully during construction of the 2003 parking garage expansion. 2. Utilize Airport owned property on the south side of Kirby Road for a temporary tree storage and for storage of 800 cubic yards of topsoil during construction of the garage. The original Site Plan application called for temporarily removing numerous existing trees on the parking garage site and then replanting these trees in their original location when the project is completed. There is also a need to remove the existing topsoil around the garage site during construction and replace this at the conclusion of the project. The Airport's property south of Kirby Road is a relatively convenient location to store the trees and topsoil during the garage construction. It is expected that the trees and topsoil will remain at this location until June 2011 when site restoration is completed. a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) The Kirby Road property is presently vacant lots that formally were residential properties. b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) The tree nursery will occupy an area approximately 50' x 200'. The topsoil storage area will be approximately 50' x 90'. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Existing and proposed building square footage: No change from rom previous approval; no additional buildings are proposed under this amendment. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) No change from previous approval. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not applicable. f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): No change from previous approval. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 942 acres = 41,033,520Sq. Ft. No change from previous approval. I a) Building: Existing Unknown % / sq. ft. Proposed 0 % added (all expansion is vertical) / b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing Unknown % / sq. ft. Proposed 0% added / sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 29.3 % / sq. ft. Proposed 0 % added / sq. ft. sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 14,500 sq. ft.* (0.33 acres) additional disturbance under this amendment. * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): No change from previous approval. b) Landscaping: No change from previous approval. c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): No change from previous approval. Total project cost: No change from rom previous approval. 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): No change from previous approval. b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): See 10 a). c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): See 10 a). 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: See 10 a). 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: See 10 a). 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: June 2011 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) A list of abutting property owners to the Burlington International Airport is attached. 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APP4kANT � . T ..O.�. 01 � r Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 01) REVIEW AUTHORITY:(--Deve16­vment Review oar Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: omplete h OWNER Mailing Address Address city State Zip Property Address 911 ADDRESS r CITY STATE ZIPCODE 3000 WILLISTON RD LLC C/O FREDERIC LOWEA 1852 TEXAS HILL ROAD HINESBURG VT 05461 3000 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 3065 WILLISTON RD LLC 3069 WILLISTON ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 3065 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 3069 WILLISTON ROAD LLC 3069 WILLISTON ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 3069 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 A & C REALTY LLC C/O OMEGA ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO. 25 OMEGA DRIVE WILLISTON VT 05495 8 BERARD DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ADAMS PAUL G 1215 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 221 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ADAMS PAUL G 1215 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 223 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ADAMS PAUL G 1215 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1215 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ADAMS PAUL G 1215 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 46 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ADAMS RONALD C & RUTH A 1083 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1083 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 AIRPORT REALTY FBO AVCENTER 1130 AIRPORT DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1 AIRPORT BURLINGTON I SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ARRANTS STEPHEN P JR 137 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 137 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ASHTON THERESA & MICHAEL 1195 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1195 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ATLANTIC TELEMETRY INC PO BOX 1660 WILLISTON VT 05495 41 AIRPORT BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DETTE ROBERT J TRUSTEE AUDETTE ANNE W TRUSTEE 41 PETERSON TERRACE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1900 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 I TOMASTERS MOTOR CO INC ROUTE 7 SHELBURNE VT 05482 52 AIRPORT BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 AVIATRON INC US 25 CUSTOMS DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 52 AIRPORT BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 AYER PATRICK BRIAN MASLACK AYER TERESE PO BOX 9451 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05407 4 BERARD DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BARNIER SCOTT & BARBARA 20 JACKSON STREET ESSEX JUNCTION VT 5452 25 BERARD DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BARRY BRUCE 1907 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1907 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BELTER JOHN H JR & JOYCE N 2 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 102 ETHAN ALLEN DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BERGER RUSSELL G III 615 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 615 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BLOW MALCOM D & REBECCA J 449 WHITE ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 449 WHITE ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BOARDMAN WILLIAM M & CYNTHIA D 42 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 42 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BOUFFARD MARGARET M, PATRICK C, JOSEPH N 65 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 65 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BRESNAHAN PHILLIP W III & KARE 21 BUTLER DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 448 WHITE ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BRUECKNER ROBERT D & ROSEMARIE 451 WHITEST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 451 WHITEST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BRUSOE ALAN L SOUTIERE ANN M. 11 MAYFAIR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 11 COMMERCE AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BURLINGTON CITY OF HERTZ CORP 225 BRAE BOULEVARD PARK RIDGE NJ 07656 5 AIRPORT CAR RENTAL SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BURT RUSSELL & KAREN L 141 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 141 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CALKINS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1835 SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 3 CALKINS CT SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CALKINS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1835 SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 5 CALKINS CT SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CAMERON PATRICIA A & WILLIAM T 1247 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1247 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CAMPION PAUL R PO Box 9413 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05407 24 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CARTER RICHARD G 165 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 165 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CHASE THOMAS E 29 BERARD DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 29 BERARD DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 HOINIERE PROPERTIES LLC 17 HARBOR WATCH ROAD BURLINGTON VT 05401 3017 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 IRCHILLANN H 64 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 64 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 Y OF BURLINGTON 1200 AIRPORT DRIVE #1 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 471 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CITY OF BURLINGTON 1200 AIRPORT DRIVE #1 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 56 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CLIFTON DAVID L & MARY W PO BOX 9476 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05407 21 BERARD DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CUNNINGHAM TRISTAN M BAILEY DONN 1344 5th Ave SAN FRANCISCO CA 94122 31 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DALEY KENNETH A & CAROLE 1227 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1227 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DALTON WILLIAM D 1383 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1383 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DEEDS EDWARD A CONVERSE BAY ROAD CHARLOTTE VT 05407 52 AIRPORT BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DEFORGE GARY J 32 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 32 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DEGRECHIE PAUL R & MICHELLE M 199 KIRBY RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 199 KIRBY RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DEMERS DENNIS R 958 WEBSTER ROAD SHELBURNE VT 05482 41 AIRPORT BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DEROBERTIS MARC A 1185 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1185 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DESARNO DAVID C TRUST 4 LADD POINT ROAD GRAND ISLE VT 05458 1944 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DOERING ROBERT W & LORRIE M 1089 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1089 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DUHAMEL YVETTE I 30 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 30 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DUNKLEY THOMAS S & CHERYL I 24 WHITE CHURCH LANE WESTFORD VT 05494 396 WHITE ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 C \Documents and SettingsVopratt\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\1 H35Q815\Abutters list —Revised 04_21_2010 As Page 1 of 3 OWNER Mailing Address Address city State Zip Pro a Address 911 ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIPCODE EMMONS ROGER A & ANNA M 1085 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1085 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ENTERTAINMENT UNLIMITED LLC 20 BISBEE ROAD VERGENNES VT 05491 1205 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 FARGNOLI ASSOCIATES LLC 485 KIMBERLY DRIVE MELBOURNE FL 32940 1890 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT 3630 HACKS CROSS ROAD, BUILDING C 3RD FLOOR MEMPHIS TN 8125-880 1 AIRPORT BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 FINNIGAN MICHAEL J & JOANNE J 35 Southwind Drive BURLINGTON VT 05401 34 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 FOLEY JOHN F & JOAN B 60 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 60 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 FONTAINE PAUL A & KIMBERLY A 133 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 133 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 GARVEY EDWARD W & PATRICIA G 44 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 44 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 GIRARD DANIEL E 11 HEATH STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1 41 JAIRPORT BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAYES BRIAN G 1495 Sandy Birch Road MILTON VT 05469 22 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 HENNIGAR HOLDINGS LLC 805 EAST HILLSBORO BOULEVARD DEERFIELD BEACH FL 33441 3097 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 HENRY MAUREEN C C/O THE MEDICAL STORE LTD 1225 AIRPORT PARKWAY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1225 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 HOBBS JAMES E & SHERRIE L 16 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 16 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 'ESTORS CORP OF VT 30 MAIN STREET, SUITE 401 BURLINGTON VT 05407 1795 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 -,,CKSON SAMUAL 37 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 37 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 JAQUES BRIAN L & LISA A 137 BIRCH COURT BURLINGTON VT 05408 1079 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 JOST INVESTEMNTS LLC 69 COLLEGE STREET BURLINGTON VT 05401 1025 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 JTG HOLDINGS LLC II 272 WINDMILL BAY SHELBURNE VT 05482 3073 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 KELESTURA DZEVAD & SAMIRA 13 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 13 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 KINVILLE PETER A & DONNA S 11 SOUTH HENRY CT SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 11 SOUTH HENRY CT SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 KRUGER REBECCA B, DOUGLAS B 1233 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1233 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 L N P INC 25 OMEGA DRIVE WILLISTON VT 05495 1961 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 LACEYS INC. 2000 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 2000 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 LANDVATER DARRYL V OLIVER WIGHT CO 85 ALLEN MARTIN DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION VT 05407 52 AIRPORT BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 LAPLANTE BERNARD J 1181 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1181 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 LEISURE WORLD INC 1245 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1245 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 LNP INC 300 CORNERSTONE DRIVE WILLISTON VT 05495 27 COMMERCE AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 LNP INC 300 CORNERSTONE DRIVE WILLISTON VT 05495 31 COMMERCE AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 LOSO HARRY J & DIANE M 53 MARYLAND ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 53 MARYLAND ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 MAILLE GEORGE A JR & CHARLENE 38 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 38 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 MANAZIR THEODORE & CHRISTINA 129 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 129 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 METHOT DAVID F & RACHEL V 57 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 57 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 MOFFATT MARK A 1253 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1253 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 MOVABLE PEAKS 14 BERARD DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 14 BERARD DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 MUNSON EARTH MOVING CORP C/O SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY CO PO BOX 2204 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05407 2040 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 "^UNSON RANDALL G C/O SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY CO PO BOX 2204 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05407 1860 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 .RIEN DANIEL J & LEO J JR C/O R L. VALLEE INC 280 SOUTH MAIN STREET ST. ALBANS VT 05478 1801 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BRIEN DANIEL J & LEO J JR PO BOX 2184 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05407 1855 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 OLTEANU FLORIN & SVETLANA 1 ELIZABETH ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1 ELIZABETH ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 PALMER ALAN D & CHRISTINE L 5576 DORSET STREET SHELBURNE VT 05482 15 PALMER HGTS SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 PALMER ALAN D & CHRISTINE L 5576 DORSET STREET SHELBURNE VT 05482 25 PALMER HGTS SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 PICKERING RODNEY A 19404 North 4th Drive PHOENIX AZ 95027 184 KIRBY RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 PIERCE SANDRA M 72 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 72 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 PMP REALTY LLC PO BOX 600 GARDINER ME 04345 1235 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 PROULX GERARD E & SUSAN F 1155 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1155 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 RDT AVIATION, INC C/O TOM WEAVER 25 PINECREST DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION VT 05452 41 AIRPORT BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ROBAR PAUL L JR & WANDA PO BOX 5190 BURLINGTON VT 5401-519 196 KIRBY RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ROBENSTEIN ROBERT J 2 LEDOUX TERR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 2 LEDOUX TERR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ROBERT SCOTT LLC PO BOX 615 MANCHESTER ME 04351 700 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ROCHFORD CHRISTOPHER & REBECCA S 47 A! YLAND ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 47 MARYLAND ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ROONEY WALDEN J & DARLA A 5 MOUNTAIN VIEW BLVD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 5 MOUNTAIN VIEW BLVD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 RUSSELL JOHN A & LYNN A 1161 WILLISTON ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1371 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 C \Documents and Settings\ropratt\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content Outlook\1 H 35Q81 5\A butters list —Revised 04_21_2010 As Page 2 of 3 OWNER Mailing Address Address city State Zip roperty ropeAddress 911 ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIPCODE S M S REALTY PARTNERSHIP 4016 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 4016 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 SCRIGGINS GENEVA B 420 WHITE ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 420 WHITE ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 SEAFOX INC 443 GOVERNORS LANE SHELBURNE VT 05482 8 CALKINS CT SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 SHAND ROBERT M 5 ETHAN ALLEN DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 9 ETHAN ALLEN DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 SHAND ROBERT M & LYNDA A 5 ETHAN ALLEN DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 5 ETHAN ALLEN DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 SHELBURNE SHIPYARD PO BOX 610 SHELBURNE VT 05482 0 POOR FARM RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 SHELBURNE SHIPYARD PO BOX 610 SHELBURNE VT 05482 0 RIVER RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 SHEPARD GARY F & BETTY JOAN 1 PATRICK ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1 PATRICK ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 SHIP SEVIN LLC C/O KEVIN SPILLANE 334 TAMARACK SHORES SHELBURNE VT 05482 7 COMMERCE AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 SPRANO ROBERTA M 392 WHITE ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 392 WHITE ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ST JOHN VIANNEY HOME ASSN C/O KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS PO BOX 9214 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05407 17 BERARD DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUBURBAN VT PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS LLC 240 ROUTE 10 WEST WHIPPANY NJ 07981 12 BERARD DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 gWEET LEIGH M & ELLEN F 148 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 148 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 WAJA MARIAN & SOPHIE TRUST 1 BUTLER DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 225 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ATRO SAM E SR & ALBERTA M 38 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 38 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 THIBAULT LEONARD E THIBAULT DOROTHY F 1184 REYNOLDS ROAD ST ALBANS VT 05478 50 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 TILLEY FRANCES R 1141 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1141 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 TIMBERLAKE ASSOCIATES WALTER E SIMENDINGER 32 SAN REMO DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1800 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 TODISCO ANTONIO & ANNA TRUSTEE 71 LAKEWOOD PARKWAY BURLINGTON VT 05401 1223 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 TOULIS CHRISUSTOMOS A & CHRISTINE S 11 MEADOW LANE UNDERHILL VT 05489 1165 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 TRI-D III LLC 156 Acorn Ln, Suite 109 COLCHESTER VT 05446 27 BERARD DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 WETHERBEE WILLIAM F & MICHAEL W 467 DEPOT ROAD COLCHESTER VT 05446 52 AIRPORT BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 WILLARD MALCOLM 699 NOB HILL ROAD WILLISTON VT 05495 41 AIRPORT BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 WILLARD MALCOLM 699 NOB HILL ROAD WILLISTON VT 05495 52 AIRPORT BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 WOOD WARREN W & EVELYN R 35 CRESCENT BEACH DRIVE BURLINGTON VT 05708 41 AIRPORT BURLINGTON SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 WRIGHT WILLIAM G & LORETTA M 11 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 11 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 C \Documents and Settings\ropratt\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content Outlook\1 H35Q815Wbutters list —Revised 04_21_2010 As Page 3 of 3 ;tion cge site. Storage Ajacent to ge e Slopes ;,prox. 800 cy and Mulch Topsoil Pile Install silt fence around perimeter of topsoil pile INVLC• I I I C �ILC W I I I VC (.VVGI-CU UrIUCI the Construction General Permit BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT S O U T H B U R L 1 N T O N V E R M O N T DATE: APRIL 16, 201 O SCALE: 1 "=100' DWG PRELIMINARY SKETCH PLAN SHOWING TREE NURSERY AND TOPSOIL STORAGE AT EAST END OF KIRBY ROAD O 100' 200' GRAPHIC SCALE S - 1 K _M I C H A E L H A R L E S L A W R E N C E A S L A L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T E S S E X J U N C T I O N V E R M O N T _F R F E E M A N R E N C H F R E E M A N A R C H 1 T E C T S B U R L I N G T O N V E R M O N T _H O Y L E, TANNER A S S O C I A T E S I N C. B U R L I N G T O N, VERMONT _S T A N T E C S O U T H B U R L I N G T O N, VERMONT DRAWN: MCL I CI 6' 8" 0 0 11 00 I I IN 00 16• LETTER HEIGHT DIMENSIONS ARE FOR 8'-4" LETTER HEIGHTS A LESSER HEIGHT OF 8'-0" 15 ACCEPTABLE AS LONG AS THE DIMENSIONS ARE PROPORTIONAL TO THE DETAILS SHOWN ARROWS AND WORD MARKINGS THAT CONFORM TO THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET OR AS DETAILED IN THE BOOKLET ENTITLED "STANDARD ALPHABETS FOR HIGHWAY SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS" AND THE "MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES" (CURRENT EDITION) PREPARED BY THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION WILL BE ACCEPTABLE DESCRIPTIONI DETAIL DESCRIPTION2 1 SCALE SCALE Er_ REFLECTORIZED STOP BAR EDGE OF TRAVELLED WAY EDGE OF SHOULDER ��N,� x� 24" "STOP" SIGN 6' MINIMUM 12' MAXIMUM i DOUBLE 4" YELLOW CENTERLINE STOP BAR LAYOUT STOP SIGN SHALL BE PLACED ON DRIVER'S RIGHT MAINTAINING MAXIMUM VISIBILITY CLEARANCE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6' AND A MAXIMUM OF 50' FROM EDGE LINE OF INTERSECTION ROADWAY AND DOES NOT HAVE TO BE ADJACENT TO THE STOP BAR -THE DESIRED STOPPING POINT" IS THE LOCATION BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS THAT BEST ALLOWS THE STOPPED VEHICLE TO VIEW THE APPROACHING TRAFFIC DETAIL STOP BAR LAYOUT 2 SCALE N T S Er_ DETAIL TYPICAL ARROW 3 SCALE N T S Er - RADIUS VARIES S 45 DETAIL PAINTED ISLAND 4 SCALE N T S ET- 4^ X 3" X 3/16" RECTANGULAR GALVANIZED STRUCTURAL STEEL TUBING 2' � H- as as RaT 4" DOTTED LINE (WHITE) �T 4^ DASHED LINE (ALSO CALLED BROKEN OR SKIP LINES) (WHITE OR YELLOW) T 4. SOLID LINE (WHITE OR YELLOW) T 4" GAP 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINES (YELLOW) DETAIL PAVEMENT MARKING LINES 6 SCALE N T S Er- 45 ti o O j za DETAIL TYPICAL CROSSWALK SCALE N T S TO INSURE A TIGHT CONNECTION GALVANIZED LL WASHERS SHARE USED AS SPACERS S•� T3/16" T 3/" GALVANIZED BOLT SEE E DETAIL A 7/16" 2, DIA " f OP OF L 4 CONCRETE SLEEVE DETAIL "A' DETAIL SLEEVE FOR SIGN POSTS INSTALLED 5 SCALE NONE IN CONCRETE OR PAVEMENT Services Inc 55 Gr;c n Mountain 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington VT U S A 05403 Tel 802 864 0223 Far 802 864 0165 www slantec coin aantec Th. Conbactor shall v fy and bs responsml, for oli d.me n,, DO NOT scale in. drawing -any .rmrw or om,s.,onc chap bs r.p,H,d to Stantec .Moot d'y The CopyrgMa to II des,gns and drawings are the property of St.— R.prad tc ar use for ony purpose other thou I- outhorrz d by Stant.c ie forbidden Consultants Legend Notes Co f 1©10 So 9ton Revision By Appd YY MM DD Issued By Appd YY MM DO File Nome 04 PN-Trf 0et dwg TED JBL JBL 1D0411 Dwn ChXd Dsgn YY MM DO Permit -Seal BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TEMPORARY PUBLIC EXIT PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION South Burlington, Vermont TAIe PAVEMENT MARKING AND TRAFFIC SIGN DETAILS DET-1 Project No Scale 195310247 N.T.S. Drawing No Sheet Revision DET-1 3 of 0 COLORS SYMBOL - RED ( REFL ) LEGEND AND BACKGROUND - WHITE ( REFL ) ENCAPSULATED LENS IS 1 1/4" 1/2 3" (• 9 1/B' 1 2" ] 1/2" 2" 1/2' "T _ 3 3/e" 2 5/B' 2 5/e" O N E WAY m„ 2 12' 3 3/B"112 36" COLORS LEGEND - WHITE ( REFL ) BACKGROUND - RED ( REFL ) ENCAPSULATED LENS 1 1/2 M1-1 COLORS LEGEND AND BORDERS -WHITE (REFL) TOP -RED (REFL) BOTTOM (CROSS -HATCHED) -BLUE (REFL) • OPTICALLY SPACE NUMERALS ABOUT VERTICAL CENTERLINE za' H- 2 1/2" M 1 —4 G= 5 1/2" 3 3" 5 5/e" 5" 12" Rr Q 3" 2a'• M4-5 1 1/2 1 1/2 " R —� 14 5/e- 3' 1/2 TYP 12" f1+E } 15" 24 3" I- �� fM4-5 =I" COLORS LEGEND -WHITE (REFL) BACKGROUND -BLUE (REFL) M 6 — 1 1 1/2" R ttP A Cat A 1/=•• tt. 15" ]•, A = 14 5/e" c = s ,/4•• NOTES. GENERAL r 21" ALL DIMENSIONS IN INCHES OPTICALLY CENTER SYMBOLS WITHIN SECTIONS UNLESS OTHER NOTED M 6 —1 THESE SIGNS ARE INTENDED FOR GROUND MOUNTING ONLY cOLORs COLORS LEGEND -WHITE (REFL) BACKGROUND -BLUE (REFL) THE REGULATORY SIGNS SHOWN ON SHEETS PM 6 A, PM J SHALL HAVE BLACK TEXT ON REFLECTORIZED WHITE BACKGROUND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED THE WARNING SIGNS SHOWN ON PM 6 & PM 2 SHALL HAVE BLACK TEXT AND SYMBOLS ON REFLECTED YELLOW BACKGROUNDS EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE NOTED THE COLORS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE COLORS ADOPTED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS AND APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MATERIALS THE SIGN BASE MATERIALS USED FOR REGULATORY SIGNS AND WARNING SIGNS SHOWN ON SHEETS PM 6 h PM ] MAY BE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING OF THE MINIMUM THICKNESS NOTED 36" X 24" 24" X 24" 36" X • 36' 12 X 12" 30" X le' 42 X 30' 1e1• X is 30" X 30" 4e" X 4e" FLAT SHEET ALUMINUM 0060•' 00e0' 0100- HIGH DENSITY OVERDID PLYWOOD 1/2' 1/2 5/e' GALVANIZED FLAT SHEET STEEL 1B GAGE Is GAGE 14 GAGE THE REFLECTIVE MATERIAL FOR GROUND MOUNTED RUCUTATORY SIGNS SHALL BE MSHTO TYPE II OR III WHITE REFLECTIVE SHEETING APPLIED TO THE ENTIRE BACKGROUND OF THE SIGN THE TEXT PORTIONS OF THE SIGNS MAY BE LETTERING FILM, SILK SCREENED OR HAND PAINTED HAND PAINTING MUST BE COMPARABLE IN QUALITY TO THE RESULTS OBTAINED BY SILK SCREENING ENCAPSULATED LENS REFLECTIVE SHEETING SHALL BE USED FOR THE SIGN BACKGROUND WHERE NOTED SPECIFICATIONS REGULATORY k WARNING SIGNS SHALL MEET THE VERMONT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR THMFIC SIGNS TEXT DESIGN LETTERS, DIGITS, ARROWS, SPACING AND TE%T DIMENSIONS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE "STANDARD ALPHABET FOR HIGHWAY SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS" AND UESIGNS PRE- SCRIBED IN THE STANDARD HIGHWAY SIGNS AS SPECIFIED IN THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES koph, G Sla Consulting Services Inc 1,►►1�-,==���II��� 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington VT USA 05403 Tel 802 664 0223 FRs 8102 1111115 C - � www slgntec com ri{�ntec Copynght Reserved The Contractor shall renfy and h r.spon.,ble for oil d,mena DO NOT scnl. th. drpwmg - any errors or om,ss,ans shall be reported to Sla _ wdho delay The Copyrights N, p11 des,gns and draw,nge are the property of slantec R.protlucLon o use for any purpose other Man Ihat o.1huraed by SI.M.I, ¢ Wbdd.n IConsultants Notes � r^ 4% Of ©�0 SO ev1�A 9to17 1 Revision By Appd YY MM DD Issued By Appd YY MM DID F,le Nome 04_PA-Trf 0 d.g TFD JBL ABL 100414 Dwn Ch%d Dsgn YYMMOD Pernt-seal BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TEMPORARY PUBLIC EXIT PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION South Burlington, Vermont Title PAVEMENT MARKING AND TRAFFIC SIGN DETAILS DET-2 Project No Scale 195310247 N T.S Drawing No Shest Revision DET-2 4 Of 4 0 there needs to be a balance between where parking is placed and the impact on the neighborhood. Mr. Dickey said he was grateful for the redesign. He noted this is a very large building which is necessitating all the parking. He felt the applicant wasn't maximizing open space. Mr. Belair said the thinking is to continue this into the future to allow for a plan to combine the two lots into one. Ms. Quimby then moved to continue Preliminary plat Application #SD-09-51 until 16 March 2010. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Site Plan Application #SP-10-05 of City of Burlington/ Burlington International Airport to revise a previously approved plan to construct two additional parking levels to an existing three level parking garage. The amendment consists of dividing the project into two phases, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Leinwohl reviewed the history of the project. He said the Airport will be seeking funding from Burlington voters for the northern part of the garage. He showed the concept of what the phased project would look like. He indicated that the building should function without a problem. Regarding the crosswalks on Airport Drive, Mr. Leinwohl indicated that all 3 would be done as part of Phase I. He showed their location on the plan. The roof will be completed for Phase I as well. Landscaping will exceed what is required for the whole project. They would also pay the full impact fee and the money for the Williston Road improvements. Mr. Farley asked what Phase II might be done. Mr. Leinwohl said they feel about 5 years is reasonable, depending on economics. Mr. Dinklage asked if the proposed Greyhound service to the Airport is likely to negate the need for Phase H. Mr. Leinwohl said he didn't think so. Mr. Stuono noted that Plattsburgh has been making a pitch for Canadian customers and is offering free parking. He was concerned that the "Jersey barriers" don't look "finished" and could possibly remain that way. Mr. Halpern, architect for the project, said that if Phase II doesn't go, they could give it a more finished look. Ms. LaRose noted that when you issue a Certificate of Occupancy you are saying they are in compliance. Mr. Dinklage noted the Airport will be growing, and there will be more opportunities to revisit this. He said he was willing to take that chance. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-10-05 of City of Burlington /Burlington International Airport subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion Dassed unanimously. '1.0F southburlington PLANNING & ZONING February 3, 2010 Robert McEwing Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: SP-10-05 Airport Garage Expansion Dear Mr. McEwing: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Development Review Board on February 2, 2010 (effective 2/2/10). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning and Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7009 0820 0002 2430 2566 K.1�'� south *i i l k"$ PLANNING & ZONING February 3, 2010 Lou Bresee 21 Cromwell Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Airport Garage Expansion Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. . Viler south PLANNING & ZONING February 3, 2010 Michael Young 15 Dover Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Airport Garage Expansion Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. PLANNING & ZONING February 3, 2010 Alex Halpern Freeman Franch Freeman 81 Maple Street Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Airport Garage Expansion Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. PLANNING & ZONING February 3, 2010 John Leinwohl Stantec Consulting 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Airport Garage Expansion Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 2 FEBRUARY 2010 PAGE 4 there needs to be a balance between where parking is placed and the impact on the neighborhood. Mr. Dickey said he was grateful for the redesign. He noted this is a very large building which is necessitating all the parking. He felt the applicant wasn't maximizing open space. Mr. Belair said the thinking is to continue this into the future to allow for a plan to combine the two lots into one. Ms. Quimby then moved to continue Preliminary plat Application #SD-09-51 until 16 March 2010. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Site Plan Application 9SP-10-05 of City of Burlington/ Burlington International Airport to revise a previously approved plan to construct two additional parking levels to an existing three level parking garage. The amendment consists of dividing the project into two phases, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Leinwohl reviewed the history of the project. He said the Airport will be seeking funding from Burlington voters for the northern part of the garage. He showed the concept of what the phased project would look like. He indicated that the building should function without a problem. Regarding the crosswalks on Airport Drive, Mr. Leinwohl indicated that all 3 would be done as part of Phase I. He showed their location on the plan. The roof will be completed for Phase I as well. Landscaping will exceed what is required for the whole project. They would also pay the full impact fee and the money for the Williston Road improvements. Mr. Farley asked what Phase II might be done. Mr. Leinwohl said they feel about 5 years is reasonable, depending on economics. Mr. Dinklage asked if the proposed Greyhound service to the Airport is likely to negate the need for Phase II. Mr. Leinwohl said he didn't think so. Mr. Stuono noted that Plattsburgh has been making a pitch for Canadian customers and is offering free parking. He was concerned that the "Jersey barriers" don't look "finished" and could possibly remain that way. Mr. Halpern, architect for the project, said that if Phase II doesn't go, they could give it a more finished look. Ms. LaRose noted that when you issue a Certificate of Occupancy you are saying they are in compliance. Mr. Dinklage noted the Airport will be growing, and there will be more opportunities to revisit this. He said he was willing to take that chance. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-10-05 of City of Burlington Burlington International Airport subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley / seconded. Motion passed unanimously. C � � southburlington PLANNING & ZONING February 3, 2010 Robert McEwing Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: SP-10-05 Airport Garage Expansion Dear Mr. McEwing: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Development Review Board on February 2, 2010 (effective 2/2/10). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning and Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7009 0820 0002 2430 2566 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tell 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com south:. . PLANNING & ZONING February 3, 2010 Lou Bresee 21 Cromwell Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Airport Garage Expansion Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office, Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc, 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com �"`� south''. , � • .. PLANNING & ZONING February 3, 2010 Michael Young 15 Dover Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Airport Garage Expansion Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802,846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com south."", - PLANNING & ZONING February 3, 2010 Alex Halpern Freeman Franch Freeman 81 Maple Street Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Airport Garage Expansion Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc, 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802 846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com I sootFly,., �. ri �, r rT�:. A Y � k w iX ,'� PLANNING & ZONING February 3, 2010 John Leinwohl Stantec Consulting 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Airport Garage Expansion Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 0,11 910, ' south urLti toll v e q M0 Yi Interested r a(1�1%1,� Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.'S -.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b), A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.&A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the -environmental court, the DRB must supply.a list•of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: -6 t! v PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST TOM Oak CfQ� v�11'aJe r v�cY2�k,1✓sl�,� �1uA�y� cL S�kx, VT 05y5X 07 v�- 5MvC-N Ray rrs r-Aq sty sort e4rZA0 !sets, Vr 62VAWl ("I q✓io P67 �z5 �/�;,Pcr/L E,5 G?e. ✓� 2 �✓,o�ey t7114Z, �d�� Vr � z5 >'7 wr rG� �Ylntol ,•e'er 6 VInterested Persons Record and Service List southImirlington 4 E 5 Y 0 NT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative- obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing; there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate - compliance with the applicable criteria. 24-V-S-.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a -written record of the name, address and -participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision- rendered by the DRB-rnust be mailed to every person or body appearing and -having -been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon --receipt of notice -of an appeal to --the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested - persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: 7 C.� PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST KeWt�?�H 5ea E,� tEf d-1 CX_ 2 2 ®uAx-x_Y )ALL Ia Q Dam %rr-Clr��k Tr tat-'�' UWs �c Y Interested Persons Record and Service List southburlingion V t4 Md NT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117,J'the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve -interested person status -to demonstrate - compliance with the applicable criteria -24.V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation -of each -person who has -sought interested person status_ 24 V.S.A. § 4461-(b).-A copy -of any decision rendered -by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing a -rid having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to.the-en-vir_onmental court, the DR-B must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days._24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST 17 ? 9 C9s> yc,r°�`�a c J� 9 �P yz L c VV G Flier-mAN FAmaN r7f-c'tomy4 A(---tfx 01 M "I'6 S T . r3wz_G . t'N '4 J R & � soutkv :r. A� , PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review-Ekwd FROM: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Plan er RE: Agenda Item # 6, Site Plan Application #SP-10-05, Burlington International Airport DATE: January 29, 2010 City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport, hereinafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking site plan approval to revise a previously approved plan to construct two (2) additional parking levels to an existing three (3) level parking garage. The amendment consists of dividing the project into two (2) phases, 1200 Airport Drive. The site plan for the expansion was approved on December 16, 2009. The applicant is now requesting approval to split the extensive expansion into two phases, with certain related infrastructure improvements to also be split accordingly. The applicant is proposing: Phase 1: ■ Construct two additional parking levels over the northerly end of the existing structure (see attached renderings for demonstration of what the building will look like at the completion of phase 1); ■ Total additional square footage of this phase to be 199,288 gross square feet for 612 parking spaces; ■ Total building cost for this phase of $14,808,000; ■ Landscaping costs for this phase of $365,750; ■ Pay all traffic impact fees for the entire project (based on 137 additional vehicle pm peak trip ends; see condition #8 of original approval); ■ Pay $63,473 for improvements to the Williston Road/Airport Drive intersection (see condition #9 of the original approval). 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Phase 2: ■ Construct two additional parking levels over the southerly portion; ■ Total additional square footage of this phase to be 232,884 gross square feet for 758 parking spaces; ■ Total building cost for this phase of $20,581,000; ■ Landscaping costs for this phase of $299,250; Staff has no concerns with respect to the proposed phasing of the project One element of phasing should also be included: crosswalk infrastructure and improvements on Airport Drive. These should be completed as part of Phase 1. The applicant is working with the Director of the Recreation Department and the Recreation Path Committee with respect to recreation path improvements that were to be included in the previous approval based on recommendations by the Recreation Path Committee but were somehow omitted from the final set of plans. The Recreation Path Committee will discuss this at their meeting on Monday, February 1st and prepare a memo of recommendation to the Board. Staff will have this memo on the day of the hearing. The Board should review the draft decision and any revised plans carefully for any changes with respect to this item. Should the applicant come to agreement with the Recreation Path Committee to the satisfaction of the Board, Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Site Plan application #SP-10-05. C Permit Number SP- - D CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) City Burlington, Burlington International Airport, 1200 Airport Drive, #1, South Burlington, VT 05403, Phone: 802-863-2874, Fax: 802-863-7947 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 13, Page 271 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same as 1) 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Robert A. McEwing, Director of Planning & Development; e-mail: RMccwing(n)btv.acro; Mailing address, phone, and fax # same as 1) Jon Leinwohl, P.E., Stantec Consulting, 55 Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403; e-mail: lon.leinwohl@stantec.com; Phone: 802-864-0223, x 110; Fax: 802-864-0165 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1200 Airport Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 2000 OOOOC 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 was approved by the Development Review Board on December 16, 2009. This granted approval for the applicant to construct two additional parking levels over the existing three level parking garage located at 1200 Airport Drive. At the December 161h hearing, the applicant explained that funding issues would likely require that the project be constructed in two phases and this has subsequently been confirmed by Airport Management. To formally address this situation, the applicant is herby requesting an amendment of the December 16`h Site Plan Approval to construct the project in two phases. Phase 1 will include construction of two additional parking levels over the northerly end of the existing_ structure. Architectural renderings are provided with this application to show the building at the completion of Phase 1. Phase 2 will include construction of two additional levels over the C southerly portion. Landscaping will also be completed in two phases corresponding to the north and south building_ phases. This is depicted on the attached landscaping plans. a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) No change from previous approval. b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) No change from previous approval. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Existing building_ square footage: No change from previous approval. Proposed Addition: Phase 1 (North) levels 4 & 5 will add 199,288 gross square feet (gsf); 612 parking spaces. Phase 2 (South) levels 4 & 5 will add 232,884 gsf; 758 parking s]2aces. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) No change from previous approval. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not applicable. f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): No change from previous approval. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 942 acres = 41,033,520Sq. Ft. No change from previous approval. a) Building: Existing Unknown % / sq. ft. Proposed 0 % added (all expansion is vertical) / sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing Unknown % / sq. ft. Proposed 0% added / sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 29.3 % / sq. ft. Proposed 0 % added / sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 368,000 sq. ft.* (8.4 acres; includes building footprint) Phase 1 (North) disturbed area (includes northerly portion of building): 195,200 sq ft (4.5 acres) Phase 2 (South) disturbed area (includes southerly portion of building): 172,800 sq ft (3.9 acres) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): Phase 1 (North): $14,808,000 Phase 2 (South): $20,581,000 b) Landscaping: Phase 1 (North): $365,750 Phase 2 (South): $299,250 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): Minor Utility Relocation costs are included in the overall building cost. Total project cost: $36,054,000 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): A Traffic Study has been completed for this project in accordance with the South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective January 5, 2009 and the VTrans Traffic Impact Study Guidelines. The traffic study was appended to the original application. Regarding Condition #8 in the December 16, 2009 approval, the applicant proposes that Road Impact Fees for the entire project based on 137 additional vehicle trip ends during the peak P.M. hour be paid at Phase 1. Regarding Condition #9 in the December 16, 2009 approval, the applicant proposes that payment of $63,473 for improvements to the Williston Road/Airport Drive intersection be made at Phase 1. b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): See 10 a). c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): See 10 a). 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: See 10 a). 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: See 10 a). 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Phase 1 (North): December 2012 ; Phase 2 C i (South): December 2017): 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) A list of abutting property owners to the Burlington International Airport is attached. 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11 " x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF �6(;�-- , o OwAy� Y, Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I U ! � REVIEW AUTHORITY: evelopment Review Boar Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: omplet Incomple4 te �/ / fi / / r �! •, r n„v� . Mao, b LOCATION MAP OWNER Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Ph: (802) 863-2874 Fax: (802)863-1526 ARCHITECT Freeman French Freeman, Inc. 81 Maple Street, P.O. Box 306 Burlington, Vermont 05401 Ph: (802) 864-6844 Fax: (802)860-1815 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER Engelberth Construction, Inc. P.O. Box 250 463 Mountain View Drive Colchester, Vermont 05466 Ph: (802) 655-0611 Fax: (802)6654882 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Michael Lawrence Associates 8 Linden Lane Essex, Vl-. 05452 Ph. (802) 878-2778 Fax, (802)878-2778 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Hoyle,Tanner @ Associates, Inc. 125 College street, 4th Floor Burlington, VT 05401 Ph: (802)860-1331 Fax, (802)860-6499 MECH. / ELEC./ PLUMB. ENGINEERS Stantec 54 RL 106 P.O. Box 29 North Springfield, VT. 05150 Ph (802)886-2261 Fax: (802)886-2260 CIVIL ENGINEERING Stantec 55 Green Mountain Drive P.O. Box 2246 South Burlington, VT 05407 Ph: (802)864-0223 Fax: (802) 864-0165 i - PARKING EXPANSION PROJECT 2 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT OPEN AIR PARKING STRUCTURE PERMIT SET FOR NORTH PHASE CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED NORTH PHASE GARAGE ADDITION freeman I french j freeman 81 Maple Street - Burlington Vermont 05401 802,864.6844 •www.fffinc.com Architecture • Planning - Interiors SCHEDULE OF DRAWINGS A-000 TITLE SWEET ARCHITECTURAL OVERALL SITE RENDERING PERSPECTIVE RENDERING NORTH END PLAN RENDERING A-101 3rd { 4th LEVEL PLANS A-102 5th LEVEL 4 GREEN ROOF PLANS OVERALL 51TE SECTION STUDY" LANDSCAPE L-L TREE TRANSPLANT AND PLANTING PLAN L-7 TREE TRANSPLANT AND PLANTING PLAN DATE 01/21/ 2010 PERMIT SET Burlington International Airport 2009 Traffic Study Stantec June 19, 2009 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................1.1 1.1 STUDY PURPOSE.............................................................................................................1.1 1.2 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS IN THE VICINITY OF THE AIRPORT.........................................1.3 1.2.1 Airport Traffic Pattern...........................................................................................1.3 1.2.2 Airport Access, Parking, and Circulation..............................................................1.4 1.2.3 Airport Vehicle Trip Generation............................................................................1.6 1.2.4 New Airport Vehicle Trip Generation between 2008 and 2016 ............................1.6 1.3 ANALYSES RESULTS.......................................................................................................1.6 1.3.1 Airport Trip Percentage of Volume at Adjacent Intersections..............................1.7 1.3.2 Level of Service (Design Hour Volumes).............................................................1.7 1.3.3 Traffic Signal Warrants (Existing Airport Average Conditions) ............................1.8 1.3.4 Air Quality Permit Condition Findings..................................................................1.8 1.4 RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................................1.9 1.4.1 Recommended Improvements Considering Future Airport Growth .....................1.9 1.4.2 Recommended Study Area Improvements Irrespective of Airport Traffic Volume Increases.............................................................................................................1.9 2.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................2.11 2.1 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT....................................................................2.11 2.1.1 Prior traffic Studies............................................................................................. 2.11 2.1.2 Airport Parking Facilities....................................................................................2.12 2.1.3 Airport Passengers............................................................................................2.15 2.2 SCOPE OF STUDY..........................................................................................................2.17 2.2.1 Analysis Conditions............................................................................................2.17 2.2.2 Study Area Intersections....................................................................................2.17 3.0 EXISTING ACCESS CONDITIONS..................................................................................3.18 3.1 AIRPORT ACCESS ROADWAYS AND ADJACENT INTERSECTIONS .........................3.18 3.1.1 Williston Road / Airport Drive / Kennedy Drive..................................................3.18 3.1.2 Airport Drive / Airport Road / General Aviation Terminal Driveway ...................3.18 3.1.3 Airport Drive / Airport Entrance..........................................................................3.19 3.1.4 Airport Drive / Employee Entrance.....................................................................3.19 3.1.5 Airport Drive / Airport Exit /Maryland Street.......................................................3.19 3.1.6 Airport Drive / Airport Drive Extension / White Street / Airport Long Term Parking 1 Driveway............................................................................................................ 3.19 3.2 CRASH HISTORY OF ADJACENT INTERSECTIONS....................................................3.19 3.3 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TO THE AIRPORT............................................................3.20 3.4 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES......................................................................3.23 3.5 EXISTING STUDY AREA TRAFFIC VOLUMES..............................................................3.23 3.6 AIRPORT ACCESS..........................................................................................................3.24 3.6.1 Airport Trip Generation Rate..............................................................................3.24 V \1953\aclive\195310247\aviabon\Permits\Traffic Access Study -Air Qual Permit Analysis\Report06-08-09 doc Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Table of Contents 4.0 FUTURE ACCESS CONDITIONS....................................................................................4.25 4.1 EXPECTED DEVELOPMENT UNRELATED TO THE AIRPORT....................................4.25 4.1.1 Background Traffic Growth................................................................................4.25 4.2 FUTURE "NO BUILD" TRAFFIC VOLUMES....................................................................4.25 4.3 AIRPORT TRAFFIC GROWTH DURING COMMUTER PEAK HOUR.............................4.28 4.3.1 New Airport Trips...............................................................................................4.28 4.4 FUTURE "BUILD" TRAFFIC VOLUMES...........................................................................4.28 5.0 ANALYSES......................................................................................................................5.31 5.1 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS..........................................................................5.32 5.1.1 Level of Service Criteria.....................................................................................5.32 5.1.2 Unsignalized Intersections.................................................................................5.32 5.1.3 Overall Intersection Analysis Summary ............................................................. 5.33 5.2 TURN LANE WARRANTS REVIEW.................................................................................5.34 5.3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS REVIEW........................................................................5.35 6.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................6.36 6.1 RECOMMENDATIONS.....................................................................................................6.36 6.1.1 Recommended Improvements Considering Airport Volume Growth .................6.36 6.1.2 Recommended Study Area Improvements Irrespective of Airport Traffic Increases ........................................................................................................................... 6.36 dtd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY 1.0 Executive Summary Burlington International Airport (BTV) enplanements (and deplanements) have generally increased year to year and the overall increase in passengers brings added demand for parking space in the garage or elsewhere. On average days, spaces are generally available in the garage but on during some recent peak travel days, over 750 vehicles were parked airside fields adjacent to taxiways. To mitigate this peak day parking situation, the airport has initiated a valet parking service for long term parking whereby passengers' cars are parked or retrieved at night from a remote location on Valley Road off Williston Road that can accommodate 500 vehicles. To further mitigate the existing and projected BTV parking demands, a 1,460 space expansion of the parking garage is proposed. In association with the proposed expansion, this study evaluates the traffic operating conditions with the projected airport growth at intersections in the vicinity of Burlington International Airport (BTV) with projected airport growth. Figure 1 illustrates the project location and the study area intersections. Historically, parking supply increases have been permitted by the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department (ANR) of Environmental Conservation and locally by the South Burlington Design Review Board. The current permit issued by the state to the City of Burlington, the airport owner, is dated March 19, 2003 included a condition that the 2008 traffic volumes generated by the garage are to be studied and reported back to the ANR. As of June 1, 2009 legislation was approved and signed into law repealing the indirect source air quality permit requirements and therefore no permit is required for airport parking beyond the 3,183 spaces permitted in 2003; however, the condition in that permit must be met. 1.1 STUDY PURPOSE This traffic study addresses this outstanding condition of the ANR March 2003 permit. Specifically, collected 2008 traffic volume data is compared with 2008 projections prepared in 2003. The traffic study also provides analyses to identify any impacts to intersection levels of service due to additional airport growth through the year 2016 as part of the permit process with the South Burlington Design Review Board for 1,460 spaces in two successive garage expansion phases planned for 2010 and 2011. This report will serve the City of South Burlington Design Review Board in consideration of the "impacts" of the proposed garage or more specifically the impacts of the 2008 - 2016 increment of continued airport growth. Toward this end, the project team held an informal discussion with the South Burlington Planning Department staff to present the traffic study approach which recognizes that the incremental growth in enplanements will generate new trips. The expanded parking garage will better meet the existing parking demands and that of the additional passengers served by the airport through the year 2016. dtd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 1 .1 +2 Y ! Y. 1 3 ve 300 --�,;� - •,\. . _ 1f- - , ---- -,A4 - -tea t tad A INTLRNATIUNA,,L All I �_-=- tA �"�'���� "'� �` = ' • � Burlington �`�•� !�' :� •�, International Study Area Airport ' `�{''� ;•• . Intersections I South + = ' Burlingtoli ` 01�jew tJd oft Ila r _ ' ��'f ."I+`I�.la .. ~�••• - � F+f' � 0��� ii I +.�'•��,�f'" __� ♦�• �Yrl. QUAR SITE • /, 'Brook `,l F / I ' J40o r, SCALE i `1 South Burlington Vermont Burlington International Airport Traffic Study 195310247 3/10/2009 .id A+ J f �r • I f Project Location Map i A Figure 1 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT U.S.A. 05403 Tel. 802.864.0223 Fax. 802.864.0165 www.stantec.com Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Executive Summary June 5, 2009 1.2 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS IN THE VICINITY OF THE AIRPORT Historical traffic volume levels on Airport Drive and Williston Road have been researched from prior studies and data libraries of the Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Commission and the Vermont Agency of Transportation. Existing traffic conditions have been observed at the adjacent Airport Drive intersections and at the airport entrance. Projections of future airport vehicle trips have been developed based, in part, on the correlation of observed airport loop road traffic volumes and the enplanement forecasts prepared for the concurrent airport master plan. Record information indicates: o Airport Drive carries an approximately 10,000 vehicles per average day (vpd); o The airport access loop serving the garage and the terminal serves approximately 3,500 vpd on an average day ; o US Route 2 west of Airport Drive carries approximately 17,000 vpd. Observations of existing traffic volumes include: o November 19 & 20, 2008 morning and evening commuter period turning movement counts at Airport Drive intersections and machine recorded 48 - hour counts on the Airport Entrance road; o June 11, 2008 twelve-hour turning movement count conducted by VTrans at the Williston Road /Airport Drive / Kennedy Drive intersection. Future conditions are assumed to reflect the following: o No other specific approved projects will generate additional traffic in this area; o According to the Vermont Agency of Transportation, regional traffic growth is expected to increase about 5 percent over the next ten years; o BTV will experience vehicle growth related to a forecast' of 3.2 percent annual increase in enplanements considering the BTV future market share and an annual growth. 1.2.1 Airport Traffic Pattern The results of the airport entrance road observations indicate the airport landside traffic pattern has four distinct peak periods during the day corresponding to the airport flight schedule as follows: o Before the commuter peak period when departing flights predominate; ' Campbell and Paris Engineers Memo dated January 2009 to Burlington International Airport RE: Forecast Letter Report - Burlington International Airport. dtd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 1.3 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Executive Summary June 5, 2009 o During late morning / midday when there is a mix of arriving and departing flights; o During late afternoon and continuing into the evening commuter peak, arriving and departing flights are mixed; o Late night before midnight when all flights are arriving. Of these four airport peak periods, the late afternoon period which overlaps with the commuter peak period is most critical. On November 19 and 20, 2008, the observed traffic volumes on the airport entrance and exit of the airport loop road included 187 entering vehicles and 249 exiting vehicles during the 4:30 -5:30 PM peak hour of the Williston Road / Airport Road / Kennedy Drive intersection. 1.2.2 Airport Access, Parking, and Circulation The 500 airport employees generally park for their respective shifts (three) in the employee surface lot north of the garage. This 220 space lot is accessed directly from Airport Drive and all egress is via the exit driveway serving the airport loop road. Some airport employees and City employees park in the garage and therefore travel on the airport loop road for both access and egress. FAA employees use a 100 space parking lot adjacent to the terminal and accessed off the airport loop road. Overall, employees generate the largest number of non -passenger vehicle trips. Few use the public bus. Other minor sources of vehicle traffic include deliveries and visitors to terminal concessions. Rental cars are used by twenty-two percent of passengers. There are 850 on site spaces provided for rental vehicles including 542 within the garage and 308 in the rental car maintenance area. Most of the rental vehicle trips involve a driver who is a flight passenger. Passengers pick up and drop off rental vehicles within the garage. Trips not involving passengers are typically the regular truck deliveries of new rental vehicles and rental vehicles ferried from the garage to the rental car maintenance area on the terminal side of the airport loop road adjacent to the park and shuttle vehicle parking area. While the park & shuttle lot is accessed from Airport Drive, the rental car maintenance area is accessed by rental car company employees from the airport loop road via driveway opposite the garage. A Burlington Airport StudyZ of the Burlington International Airport prepared in 2002 included a survey of passenger modes of access to and from BTV. As shown in Table 1, over a third of the passengers are dropped off or picked up, and half the passengers either drive and park or rent a car. Adding limousine and taxi trips accounts for 96 percent of the airport trips and leaves one other percent bus trips and three percent unknown. No data is available regarding vehicle occupancy. 2 Ground Access Study of the Burlington International Airport, Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization, Resource System Group, April 2002. dtd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study - air qual permit analysis\report 06-06-09 doc 1.4 Stamtec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Executive Summary June 5, 2009 Table 1 Airport Access Modal Choice Airport.. Drop Off /Pickup 35 Drive and Park 26 Rent a Car 22 Limo 8 Taxi 5 Bus 1 Other 3 Total 100 Nearly all departing passengers contribute to an entering vehicle trip on the entrance road as they would either be traveling in their personal vehicle that they will park, driving a rental vehicle that they are returning, or being dropped off by someone who might be able to quickly use a curb space or take advantage of the parking rate schedule and park for a short term period in the garage. On most days, some of the 1,533 public parking spaces in the garage are typically available for short term and overnight parking. On days when the garage is full, parking spaces are accessed by exiting the airport loop road and turning into the park & shuttle lot off Airport Drive. From this location vehicles are valet parked at several locations. In this immediate vicinity there are three lots that combine to provide 468 spaces that generally meet garage overflow parking demands. On peak days vehicles have been parked in FAA and City of Burlington an approved area on the airfield accommodating 750 spaces which are accessed directly from the park & shuttle lot. More recently, the City of South Burlington has approved restricted nighttime use for 500 vehicles at the airport "Quarry Site" off Valley Road. Valets transport vehicles to and from the Quarry Site to the Park and Shuttle Lot between the hours of 8 PM and 7AM. Arriving passengers account for fewer trips on the entrance road and more trips on the exit road as personal vehicles parked overnight and rental vehicles are driven from the airport but not onto the airport during this period. Taxi use typically involves multiple trips as passengers are dropped off curbside and some taxis reenter the airport loop road and join the waiting taxi queue. Limos provide curbside service but are not as likely to reenter for another client/fare. djd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 1.5 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Executive Summary June 5, 2009 1.2.3 Airport Vehicle Trip Generation Airport traffic volumes are principally a function of passenger enplanements and deplanements. During 2008, BTV recorded 762,852 enplanements, which averages approximately 2,100 enplanements each day. With a comparable number of deplanements, BTV serves 4,200 passengers during an average day. Second to passenger demand, the parking needs of approximately 500 people who are employed at the airport are spread over three shifts. Other lesser airport trip purposes include terminal concession deliveries, rental vehicle deliveries, and visitors. Stantec formulated a relationship between passengers and airport vehicle trips based on the airport landside mode choice, the hourly schedule of arriving and departing passengers, and 2008 traffic counts. Ninety six percent of BTV departing passengers arrive at the airport in their personal vehicle or some other form of auto travel and thereby, in general, generate an entering trip during the hour prior to their scheduled flight. About half of these are entering trips that result in a personal vehicle being parked overnight in the garage (26 percent) and a rental vehicle being returned to the garage (22 percent). Therefore as departing passengers generate about half as many exiting trips. Arriving flight passengers demonstrate a reversed pattern with more exiting trips than entering trips during the hour that they arrive. This premise was then applied to the November 19, 2008 traffic count on the airport entrance road to correlate the observed traffic volumes. The resulting evening peak hour BTV vehicle trip generation is roughly estimated with respect to the number of airline passengers as follows: o Entering trips - Less than one (0.63) entering vehicle for each departing passenger on flights during the hour following the peak hour and half the arriving passengers during the peak hour; and o Exiting trips — Less than one (0.78) exiting vehicle for each arriving passenger on flights during the peak hour and half the departing passengers on flights during the hour following the peak hour. 1.2.4 New Airport Vehicle Trip Generation between 2008 and 2016 Between 2008 and 2016, the assumed airport traffic growth of 3.2 percent per year will result in an additional 125 evening peak hour vehicles during an average day and the peak hour of the adjacent street; of these, 53 are entering vehicles and 72 are exiting vehicles. 1.3 ANALYSES RESULTS Stantec conducted several analyses relating to various aspects of the traffic operations at intersections adjacent to the airport. Initially the percentage of airport traffic within the traffic flow through the adjacent intersections was calculated and subsequently other analyses were performed to determine airport traffic impacts, if any, to respond to prior Air Quality concerns and permit conditions, and to determine if turning lane or traffic signal warrants were met. d1d v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 1.6 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Executive Summary / June 5, 2009 1.3.1 Airport Trip Percentage of Volume at Adjacent Intersections Based on the November 20, 2008 traffic counts at the Airport Drive intersections and the airport loop road the percentage of airport traffic through the Airport Drive intersections was determined. As shown in Table 2, these percentages range from 12.7 to 33 percent. Table 2 Existing Airport Traffic through Adjacent Intersections 1.3.2 Level of Service (Design Hour Volumes) As an initial step, analysis was conducted for both the existing (2009) morning and evening peak hour conditions to affirm th at the evening peak hour is the worse case condition of the day. The analysis indicates the evening peak hour is the more critical or worse case peak period operationally. The traffic counts generally indicate that the evening peak hour is heaviest overall intersection traffic flow period. Levels of Service results for existing and future conditions are presented in Table 3. Table 3 Intersection Level of Service Analysis Results 00• 2011Ir AirportIntersection Build Bui AM PM B u Id D Hq White Street I D I F F F F F Unsignalized Airport Exit B F F F F F Unsignalized Employee Parking lot A A A A A A Unsignalized Airport Entrance A A A A A B Unsignalized Airport Road B F F F F F Unsignalized Williston Road C E E E F F Signalized dtd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 1.7 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Executive Summary June 5. 2009 1.3.3 Traffic Signal Warrants (Existing Airport Average Conditions) At the Airport Egress Driveway intersection with Airport Drive, under existing 2009 conditions traffic volumes on the airport exit driveway exceed the Warrant 1 Condition A vehicular volume thresholds for a two-lane minor road approach (200 vph) for 7 of the required 8 hours specified by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Hourly volumes on Airport Drive exceed the single lane major road approach volume threshold (500 vph) during only a few of the required 8 hours. This intersection is expected to meet the required signal warrant thresholds with growth on Airport Drive by the year 20XX. Analysis indicates the intersection will experience LOS F delays under 2011 and 2016 conditions. • At the Airport Road intersection with Airport Drive, Traffic Signal Warrant 1 Condition B applies whereby vehicular volume threshold for single lane major road approaches is 750 vph for each of 8 hours and for a single lane minor road approach the threshold is 75 vph for 8 hours. Peak hour volumes do exceed these thresholds but not the required 8 hours in an average day. • At the White Street intersection with Airport Drive, traffic volumes do not meet the traffic signal warrant levels basically due to the minimal volume of conflicting movements. Due to the right angle configuration of the major flows, conflicting minor movements do result in a crash rate exceeding the state average although less than the crash rate of a High Crash Location and that prompting the lowering of traffic signal warrant volume thresholds. 1.3.4 Air Quality Permit Condition Findings The Indirect Source Air Pollution Control Permit issued by the Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation on March 19, 2003 required a follow up study of the trip generation rate exhibited by the airport in 2008 as compared to that projected at the time of the study in 2002. While the requirement for Indirect Source Air Pollution Control Permits is no longer required for new construction; however, conditions of the existing permit remain. The following summary is offered in that regard. Counts conducted during July of 1999 were adjusted to provide 2003 and 2008 design hour conditions for the study prepared in 2008. In 2008 traffic counts were conducted by machines for a 48 hour period at the airport entrance on the airport loop road and during the morning and evening peak periods at the airport entrance and exit during the Wednesday and Thursday before the Thanksgiving holiday on November 19 and 20. While the average day in 2008 generates 4,200 trips (including 2,100 entering and 2,100 exiting) and on Thursday November 20, 2008, there were 3,200 vehicles recorded entering ( and an assumed similar number exiting) the airport loop road totaling 6,400 vehicle trips. A 24-hour count in 2003 is not available for comparison. The 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM peak hour was recognized as the design hour period of the day in 2003. This compares to the 2008 observation which indicates the 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM hour is the applicable specific design hour based on the observed peak volume conditions at the djd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 1.8 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Executive Summary June 5, 2009 Williston Road and Airport Drive intersection and the associated highest potential for impact due to airport traffic at that intersection. The incremental airport generated traffic projected between the years 2003 and 2008 totaled 110 vehicle trips during the evening peak hour including 41 entering vehicle trips and 69 exiting vehicle trips. By comparison, the incremental airport trip generation between 2008 and 2016 totals 125 vehicle trips including 53 entering vehicle trips and 72 exiting vehicle trips. 1.4 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are provided based on the traffic study. 1.4.1 Recommended Improvements Considering Future Airport Growth As analysis indicates congestion and delays on the airport exit driveway during the future design hour conditions; therefore, a near term improvement of the airport exit driveway/Airport Drive intersection is recommended. Traffic signal control may be a solution; however, the existing hourly volume levels during an average day on Airport Drive do not exceed the signal warrant thresholds required during eight hours of the average day. Based on assumed annual growth, warrants may be met by the year 2014. 1.4.2 Recommended Study Area Improvements Irrespective of Airport Traffic Volume Increases At the White Street intersection, conduct a historical review of the control measures employed at this intersection and the crash rates experienced with each set of control measures. Yield control on the eastbound approach has produced repeated crashes for several years between eastbound through and northbound left turn vehicles. Continuing to allow the northbound approach to be free of control and all of the other three approaches under STOP sign control (including the eastbound approach) is recommended. At the Williston Road and Kennedy Drive intersection with Airport Drive, experiences overall LOS E under existing conditions and projects to LOS F by 2016 with or without airport growth. Improvements are recommended including the long term roundabout alternative identified in the US Route 2 Corridor Study as well as other additional signalized alternatives that address the heavy demand of northbound left turns and on the westbound approach. A sensitivity analysis that illustrates the ability to improve the approach, movement and overall Level of Service is presented in Figure 9. This could guide the selection of alternative signalized measures to meet the peak periods demands of which the airport traffic represents approximately 13 percent. • At the Airport Road and Airport Drive intersection, as indicated by the capacity analysis movements from Airport Drive are delayed. Airport Road left turns outnumber the right turns and are, in general, vehicles that have taken an alternate routing to the eastbound left turn from Williston Road. While volumes appear to be close to that warranting a traffic signal, the dtd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 1.9 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Executive Summary June 5, 2009 prospect of additional delay to Airport Drive traffic should be considered as well as delay to Airport Road left turns under signal control coordinated with and in deference to the Williston Road signal operation. Adding a right turn lane to Airport Drive without signalization would reduce delay. Also, the northbound left turn volume at this intersection exceeds the warranting threshold for a left turn lane. While this condition does result in occasional delay to northbound traffic flow, a left turn lane at this location is not recommended. dtd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study - air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 1.10 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Introduction June 5, 2009 2.0 Introduction This study has been prepared to observe and evaluate the operation of intersections in proximity to the Burlington International Airport (BTV) under existing conditions and under future design year 2011 and 2016 conditions. These years correspond to the opening of the Phase I expansion of the garage in 2011 and a time 5 years after its opening. This intersection evaluation meets the conditions of the Indirect Source Air Pollution Control Permit issued in March 19, 2003 and its re -issuance for the proposed parking supply increase of 1,460 spaces. The intersection operational analysis has been prepared to satisfy the concerns of the South Burlington Design Review Board and follows the VTrans guidelines in preparing traffic studies that are reviewed within the ACT 250 process. 2.1 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2.1.1 Prior traffic Studies Several other traffic studies have been prepared recently in the airport area. Some of these are directly related to the airport. These include several traffic studies conducted for the airport in regard to parking garage and expansion proposals. These are: Traffic Study for Burlington International Airport Parking Project prepared by TRANS /OP INC., January 1997. o Traffic Impact Study for Burlington International Airport Expansion 2000 prepared by TRANS / OP INC., October 1999. o Traffic Impact Study for Burlington International Airport Expansion 2003 prepared by TRANS / OP INC., October 2002. Two studies have been prepared for the Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) regarding local access to the airport: o Ground Access Study of the Burlington International Airport by RSG Inc., April 2002. This study has provided airport access mode choice information. o Airport Drive/ Airport Parkway Improvements Scoping Study by Stantec (formerly Dufresne -Henry) October, 2005. This report presented alternatives to improve airport access including one that would provide a connection between Airport Drive and Airport Parkway on airport property and reduce or eliminate the dependency on White Street. The Route 2 Corridor Study completed in 2007 by RSG for the CCMPO included projections and recommendations for the Williston Road (Route 2) / Airport Drive / Kennedy Drive djd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 2.11 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Introduction June 5, 2009 intersection. This study includes a year 2030 scenario. It is noted that the traffic counts conducted for the corridor study were conducted in 2005 and that the Kennedy Drive improvement project which was completed in 2008. 2.1.2 Airport Parking Facilities BTV passenger facilities include a terminal building and adjacent parking garage accessed via the airport loop off Airport Drive. Passengers are dropped off and picked by the curb space along the terminal but in a manner consistent with federal Transportation Security Administration limitations on curb space use. In this regard the airport garage is extensively used for short term parking. During the month of November 2008, approximately 25 percent of the garage tickets were issued to users who stayed 30 minutes or less. Parking stays of 2 hours or less represented approximately 56 percent of the tickets issued and parking durations of 24 hours or less represented 64 percent of the garage tickets issued. Additional passenger parking accommodations on the airport include: o The airport park and shuttle operation adjacent to the airport exit driveway and accessed directly from Airport Drive at its intersection with White Street; o Airside airport park and shuttle parking accessed by valets through the park & shuttle parking area; o Remote valet parking operation for long term parking located away from the terminal area at the southern end of the airport off Valley Road via Williston Road. Other airport parking lots include: o An employee parking lot accessed directly from Airport Drive; o An FAA parking lot located adjacent to the terminal; o The taxi waiting area on the airport loop road near the entrance; o A common rental car maintenance area with a driveway access from the airport road with proximity to the garage. The locations of these parking facilities are shown on Figure 2 and parking capacities are listed in Table 4. In addition, the general aviation terminal and associated parking area located off Airport Drive at its intersection with Airport Road. And, there is commercial activity on southern parcels of airport property with access to Williston Road off Aviation Drive. did v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 2.12 1 Stantet BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Introduction June 5, 2009 Table 4 BTV Parking Summary Proposed Location.. Gara a PUBLIC Short term 1,533 1,460 2,993 Onsite Lot off Airport Drive Lon Term Shuttle 302 0 302 Onsite Lot off Airport Drive Extension Lonq Term Valet 150 0 150 Onsite Lot off Airport Drive Extension Long Term Valet 18 0 18 Curb Parking off Airport loop road Short Term 10 0 10 Airfield Long Term Overflow Valet 750* 0 750 Quarry Site off Williston Road Long Term Restricted Valet 500** 0 500 ALL PUBLIC 3.263 1,460 4.723 NON-PUBLIC FAA Lot off Airport loop road FAA 100 0 100 Employee Lot off Airport Drive Employees 220 0 220 Garage Rental Vehicles 542 0 542 Rental Car Maintenance off loop road Rental Vehicles 1 308 1 0 308 ALL NON - PUBLIC 11,170 0 1,170 TOTAL 4,433 1,460 5,893 * Up to 750 cars valet parked on airfield for peak day parking overflow needs. *" Up to 500 cars parked at Airport "Quarry" site with valet access and egress restricted to ni htime only. djd v \1953\active\195310247\awadon\permits\traffic access study - air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 2.13 ° QUUAARRY_ SITE LONG TERM ° o° o RESTRICTED ACCESS - VALET PARKING AREA C\ OFF WILLISTON ROAD - I500 SPACES 1 AIRFIELD SIDE OVERFLOW - VALET PARKING -AREA PO 150 SPACES 1ZO n 00 0 0 °� • ' ' 4 °Q'a b o 0 o m opa Qo ogfl � cyo r8 a0 oMAIN TERMINAL PARKING SEE INSET�— �J o Ooo�OQO 0 Oyo 00 OOoo9 p0o ° 4 pO�O�o gOb6b p piOo O�Opp p �O p0 °00GO 0 0 ogp�o0� —� )/ Q�� �4 // 0 ° 6 � v/�00,... O/Si" `2 O 04n o•.,0 0 $\� � � A/\ / r Cr� --RENTALCAR _ PUBLIC WVim" CE Short term 14602993 LONG TERM -VALET 3M9 PACES Gtff Lon TnStte 302 0 302 PARKING AREA DnExtension Lo1aSPACES Tem 150 0 150Off Drne Extension Long Tann Valet 18 0 18 r EXISTING Curb Parkin off Airport 100 roatl Short Tenn 10 0 10 LONGTERM PASSENGER Airffekl LOn Term Overflow Valet 750' 0 750 302 SPACES, CURB ' • TERMINAL Qua Sde off Wtllaton Road Lon Term Restricted Valet 500" 0 500 PARgAC GARAGE EMPLOYEE 2,9933PACES (PUBLIC) 103PACES ALL PUBLIC 2,763 1,960 4,723 �LON -V T '+q� 220 SPACES 542 SPACES RENTAL gpp _ """ill GEar m NON-PUBLIC 0 PAREQ FAA Lot off Airport loop road 0 150 SPACES Lot off Airport Drive e220 0 220 Rental Veh542 0 542 Rental Car Maintenance off loop road IRental Vehicles 308 0 30t1 ALL NON - PUBLIC 1,170 0 1, 170 TOTAL 3,933 1,960 5893 MAIN TERMINAL PARKING "°^* C Up to 750 cars valet parked on airfield for peak day parking overflow needs Up l0 500 cars parked ffi Airport "Quarry" site with valet access and egress restricted to nightime only Figure 2 South Burlington Vermont Stantec Consulhna Services Inc 55 Green Mountain Dime Burlington International Airport 0affic5403 Budmgton, VT U S.A Bu Trnte Study Existing and Proposed Burlington International Airport Parking Facilities Tel. 802.8640223 Fax 802 864.0165 195310247 6I5/2009 www.stantec com /Parking Pe=it_PLOT dgn 6/5/2009 3 35.58 PM Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Introduction June 5, 2009 2.1.3 Airport Passengers In 2008, BTV served approximately 4,200 passengers daily and operated with a annual load factor of 74.7 which represents the percentage of seats on all flights that were occupied during the year. The landside traffic volumes correlate with the airside flight schedule as observed on the Airport Entrance roadway on November 19 and 20, 2008 and compared to the flight schedule on that day. These schedules are provided in the appendix. Figure 3 illustrates the arriving, departing and total seats on all BTV flights by during hours (on the half hour) allowing comparison to observed vehicle totals on the Airport Entrance Road. As exhibited by the figure the airport entrance road has four distinct peak periods during the day. These four periods correspond to the airport flight schedule which accommodated an average of 4,200 arriving and departing passengers during each day in 2008. The timing offset between the graphs of flight schedules and that of the entering vehicle observations illustrates how early passengers arrive in advance of their flight and the timeliness of their rides from the airport. These airport peak periods vary with respect to arriving and departing passengers as follows: o Before the commuter peak period when departing flights predominate (due to the aircraft grounded the night before leaving early the next day); o During late morning / midday when there is a mix of arriving and departing flights; o During late afternoon and continuing into the evening commuter peak, arriving and departing flights are mixed; o Late night before midnight when all flights are arriving. Of these four airport peak periods, the late afternoon period which overlaps with the commuter peak period is most critical. On November 20, 2008, the observed traffic volumes on the airport entrance and exit of the airport loop road included 177 entering vehicles and 237 exiting vehicles during the 4:30 -5:30 PM peak hour of the Williston Road / Airport Road / Kennedy Drive intersection. d1d v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 2.15 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Entrance Volumes --*—Total Seats Departing Seats �... E j Arriving Seats o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o C. O M M M M M M M M M CO Cl) M M M M M M M M O In O 00 m O N N M 7 CO h m O O N O O O O O { O O O O O O O O O M M M M M O O O M M M M M M M M M M O C0 V LL) O � 00 O (!') N M R V) O h 00 CO Cn O) O Time of Day Figure 3 South Burlington Vermont Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive. Burlington International Airport Airport Entrance Volume and tP South Burlington, VT U.S.A. Traffic Study Fllght Seating 05403 Te1.802.864.0223 Stantec Fax.802.864.0165 195310247 6/5/20091 www.stantec.com Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Introduction June 5, 2009 2.2 SCOPE OF STUDY As previously stated this traffic study will report on existing and future conditions related to the year that Phase I of the 1,460 space expansion is completed in 2011 and a subsequent 2016 planning year. To illustrate the impact of the captured annual airport growth through the year 2016, the analyses will also include a "No Build" condition which accounts for regional growth and any approved local projects, if any, but for comparison purposes, no airport growth. 2.2.1 Analysis Conditions In accordance with VTrans guidelines for preparing traffic impact studies, the design hour volume condition is analyzed. The design hour is associated with the 30th highest hour on the adjacent roadway. Observed worse case conditions, the evening peak hour which occurs at the Airport Drive intersection with Williston Road and Kennedy Drive is the basis for developing the adjustment factor applied to all study area turning movements to reflect the 30th highest hour conditions. 2.2.2 Study Area Intersections The study area intersections are those studied in prior airport parking garage studies which satisfy the Agency of Natural Resources permitting requirements and the Agency of Transportation (Vtrans) guidelines for selecting study area intersections based on the peak hour volume increase of 75 vehicles. To meet these requirements, Stantec has studied the following intersections: o Airport Drive at Williston Road and Kennedy Drive; o Airport Drive at Airport Road; o Airport Drive at the Airport Entrance; o Airport Drive at the airport Employee Parking Lot entrance; o Airport Drive at the Airport Exit and Maryland Street; o Airport Drive at White Street and the Park & Shuttle Lot Driveway. These intersection locations are illustrated previously on Figure 1 dtd v \1953\acnve\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 2.17 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Existing Access Conditions June 5, 2009 3.0 Existing Access Conditions Evaluation of the access to the Burlington International Airport (BTV) and assessment of the future growth on air quality requires a thorough understanding of the transportation network in the project area. The existing conditions of the adjacent roadways and intersections, public transit, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities are summarized in this section. Observations of the roadway and intersection operations include the number of lanes, both through traffic and turning lanes; the availability of shoulders and sidewalks; traffic control, and traffic volumes during peak periods. Stantec's safety evaluation of the study area includes sight distance and crash history review. 3.1 AIRPORT ACCESS ROADWAYS AND ADJACENT INTERSECTIONS Interstate 89 (1-89) is located approximately two miles west of BTV. 1-89 provides convenient regional access via the Exit14 interchange with US Route 2 (Williston Road). The airport entrance and exit off Airport Drive are used by the high majority of passengers. Airport Drive is located along the airport's western property line. Airport Drive and US 2 intersect within a half - mile of the airport entrance and exit. US 2 between Airport Drive and 1-89 is a multilane urban arterial, known as Williston Road, with left turn lanes at traffic signal control at major intersections. Airport Drive is a two-lane roadway which serves as a through route between VT 15 and Williston Road as well as local access. Six study area intersections, included in prior traffic studies for current BTV air quality permits, are described in this section. Their existing and future operation analyses results are reported and discussed in later sections. 3.1.1 Williston Road / Airport Drive / Kennedy Drive The intersection of Williston Road / Airport Drive / Kennedy Drive is traffic signal controlled. The east -west oriented Williston Road has three lanes on both approaches including an exclusive left turn lane, a center through lane and a right lane used by through and right turn vehicles. Airport Drive, the southbound approach, and Kennedy Drive the northbound approach, provide an exclusive lane for left turning, through, and right turning vehicles. This lane arrangement extends back 150 feet on Airport Drive and 190 feet on Kennedy Drive. 3.1.2 Airport Drive / Airport Road / General Aviation Terminal Driveway Airport Road intersects Airport Drive opposite the General Aviation Terminal (GAT) Driveway and approximately 500 feet north of Williston Road. Airport Drive and the GAT Driveway are STOP sign controlled. All roadways have two lanes. The approach widths on Airport Drive are 16 feet wide; on Airport Road, 15 feet; and on the GAT Driveway, 10 feet. dtd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study - air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 3.18 Stanw BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Existing Access Conditions June 5, 2009 3.1.3 Airport Drive / Airport Entrance The BIA Entrance roadway intersects Airport Drive approximately 1500 feet north of Williston Road. The two-lane entrance roadway operates as a one way roadway toward the airport. The southbound Airport Drive approach includes a 12-foot through lane and a short (90 feet) 10-foot wide left turn lane, while the northbound approach includes an 11-foot through lane and 10-foot right turn lane. 3.1.4 Airport Drive / Employee Entrance The employee parking lot entrance off Airport Drive is located about 2,800 feet north of Williston Road. The single lane driveway operates as a one-way with all traffic on this roadway moving away from Airport Drive. Airport Drive operates with single lane, 16-foot wide approaches. 3.1.5 Airport Drive / Airport Exit /Maryland Street The Airport Exit intersects Airport Drive opposite Maryland Street approximately 3,000 feet north of Williston Road. The two-lane Airport Exit roadway approach and the single -lane Maryland Street approach are STOP sign controlled. The two Airport Exit roadway lanes are separated by a raised triangular shaped island at the intersection with Airport Drive. The Airport Drive approaches are 16 feet wide. 3.1.6 Airport Drive / Airport Drive Extension / White Street / Airport Long Term Parking Driveway Airport Drive as 32-foot wide, two-lane roadway continues to White Street where the major traffic flow changes direction from north -south to east -west on White Street which has a 29 foot width. Airport Drive Extension is a 22-foot wide, two lane roadway that serves as access to airport property only. The fourth leg of the intersection is the 32-foot wide, two-way driveway to an airport long term parking lot. The Airport Drive Extension and the long term parking driveway approaches are STOP sign controlled. 3.2 CRASH HISTORY OF ADJACENT INTERSECTIONS The crash records of the study area intersections were researched from VTrans files for the three year period (2005 to 2007). The crashes were compiled and listed in the appendix and a crash rate was calculated and compared to state averages to determine if the intersection is a high crash location. Table 5 presents a summary of the crash analyses which indicates that the Airport Drive intersection with Williston Road / Kennedy Drive is a high crash location where a total of 70 crashes occurred within the three year period. Of these Williston Road intersection crashes, 39 percent were angle type crashes relating to the permitted left turn provisions which apparently increase capacity at the expense of reduced safety. Another 36 percent of the crashes are rear end type; most of these occurred on the northbound and westbound approaches where traffic volume exceeds capacity during the evening peak hour. dtd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 3.19 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Existing Access Conditions June 5, 2009 The next highest number of crashes (7) occurred at the Airport Drive and Whites Street and the Park & Shuttle driveway intersection. Most of these crashes were angle or rear end types. The angle types generally involved a movement on the southbound approach and the rear end crashes typically occurred on the westbound approach. Table 5 Crash Analyses Summary Airport Drive Crashes Severity Type Crash Rate High Crash Intersection 2005-2007 Location Williston Road 16 Personal 39% An• " • Kennedy Drive _ ar End Airport Road / Personal Angle GAT Driveway• Entrance Airport MMMMM Airport Employee Entrance • Airport Exit 0 Personal Maryland Street Injury• White Street / Airport Long Term Parking / 0 Personal • - • Injury Airport Drive Extension 3.3 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TO THE AIRPORT Ground transportation to and from Burlington International Airport includes public transportation. Numerous taxi and limousine services are available. Bus service is provided by Chittenden County Transportation Authority (CCTA) and connections can also be made to Amtrak's Vermonter Route at the nearby Essex Junction Station. The airport website provides links to these various ground transportation options. dtd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study - air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 3.20 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Existing Access Conditions June 5, 2009 Two CCTA bus routes serve the airport. Route 1, University Mall / Airport, operates on a weekday, Saturday, and Sunday schedule and includes a stop at the airport terminal. The other scheduled stops on CCTA Route 1 are: • Burlington Airport • Country Park near the Timberlane Medical Center via Hinesburg Road • The Pines near South Burlington Town Hall via Kennedy Drive • University Mall via Dorset Street • University of Vermont • Cherry Street Station Route 23, Williston, includes a stop at the Airport Drive and Williston Road intersection and runs Monday through Saturday. The Williston route provides a connection between the Essex Junction Amtrak Station and the southbound weekday morning train and northbound weekday evening train. The scheduled stops on CCTA Route 23 are: • University Mall • Williston Road / Kennedy Drive / Airport Drive • Community Drive • Shunpike / Brownell • Mal -Mart • Maple Tree Place • Taft Corners • Williston Road /Industrial Avenue • Industrial Avenue / Route 2A • Amtrak station in Essex Junction The scheduled stop times at or near the airport on these two CCTA routes are listed in Table 6. 1 did v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 3.21 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Existing Access Conditions June 5, 2009 Table 6 Chittenden County Transportation Authority Bus Routes and Schedules at/near Airport FridayMonday — Route 1 Airport Williston Rd. Route 1 Airport Williston ., . Route 1 Airport Williston Rd. .. stop Stop Stop Stop Stop 6:39 AM 6:38 AM Does not operate 7:09 on Sundays 7:29 AM 7:41 7:40 AM 7:38 8.11 8:10 8:39 8:38 8:39 9:11 9:10 9:06 AM 9:39 9:40 9:38 9:47 10:11 10:11 10:06 10:39 10:40 10:38 10:59 11:11 11:10 11.11 11:06 11:39 11:38 12:15 PM 12:11 PM 12:12 PM 12:06 PM 12.39 12:40 PM 12:38 1:11 1:11 1:06 1:39 1:40 1:38 1:29 2:11 2:12 2:11 2:06 2:39 2:38 2:44 3:11 3:12 3:11 3.06 3:41 3:42 3:38 3:59 4:06 4:11 4:11 4:39 4:42 4:38 5:00 5:06 5:20 5:12 5:11 5:14 5:45 5:38 6:09 6:09 6:08 6:06 PM 6:39 6-39 6.38 6:38 7.39 7:34 PM 7:36 PM 7:43 PM 8:39 9:54 PM 1 did v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\penrets\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 3.22 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Existing Access Conditions June 5, 2009 3.4 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES On -road bike lanes and off -road shared use paths exist within a short distance of the airport along Kennedy Drive. Facilities are planned along US Route 2 east and west of Airport Drive according to the US 2 Corridor Study. Sidewalks are present along the entirety of Airport Drive, along US 2, Kennedy Drive and White Street within the study area. There are crosswalks and pedestrian signals at the Airport Drive, US 2 and Kennedy Drive intersection. 3.5 EXISTING STUDY AREA TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing average daily traffic volume and design hour traffic volumes on the roadways in the study area are shown in Table 7. Existing daily traffic volumes were principally identified from recent traffic counts by others and design hour volumes were derived from peak period observations conducted specifically for the airport garage expansion project. Table 7 Existing (2009) Traffic Volumes -... Daily Volume Design Hour Volume White Street south of Airport Drive 6,800 (2005) 6,950 (2009) 1,000 Airport Entrance east of Airport Drive 3,050 (2009) 220 9,800 (2005) Airport Drive north of Airport Road 10,000 (2009) 1,300 Airport Road east of Williston Road 1,900 (2005) 1,950 (2009) 230 Williston Road west of Airport Drive 16,900 (2004) 17,350 (2009) 2,050 Adjustments were made using factors associated with the Vtrans continuous counting station P6D099 (1 -189 in South Burlington) where the November to Average Daily seasonal factor is 0.94, the annual growth factor is 1.0053. To adjust for the Design Hour Volumes on Airport Drive, a 1.23 adjustment factor was applied to the November counts occurring during the 4:30 to 5:30 hourly volume which was the peak hour observed at the Williston Road / Airport Drive / Kennedy Drive intersection. Networks illustrating the existing (2009) peak period traffic volumes at the study area intersections are provided in the appendix. dtd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 3.23 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Existing Access Conditions June 5, 2009 3.6 AIRPORT ACCESS A Burlington Airport Study3 of the Burlington International Airport prepared in 2002 surveyed the modes of access to and from BTV. As shown in Table 1, slightly more than a third of the passengers are dropped off or picked up, and half the passengers either drive and park or rent a car. Adding limousine and taxi trips accounts for 96 percent of the airport trips and leaves one other percent bus trips and three percent unknown. No data is available regarding vehicle occupancy. Airport access modes and the percentage of each mode to the total are: o Drop Off / Pick Up (35 percent); o Drive and Park (26 percent); o Rental Car (22 percent); o Limousine (8 percent); o Taxi (5 percent); o Bus (1 percent); o Other (3 percent) 3.6.1 Airport Trip Generation Rate With this mode split considered, the 48 percent driving and parking and renting a car is essentially the difference between entering and exiting. This relationship was then related to the November 20, 2008 traffic count. The resulting evening peak hour BTV vehicle trip generation is roughly estimated with respect to the number of airline passengers as follows: o Entering trips - Less than one (0.63) entering vehicle for each departing passenger on flights during the hour following the peak hour and half of the arriving passengers on flights during the peak hour; and o Exiting trips — Less than one (0.78) exiting vehicle for each arriving passenger on flights during the peak hour and half of the departing passengers on flights during the hour following the peak hour. 3 Ground Access Study of the Burlington International Airport, Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization, Resource System Group, April 2002. did v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qua permit an alysis\re port 06-08-09 doc 3.24 1 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Future Access Conditions June 5, 2009 4.0 Future Access Conditions For this analysis traffic volume levels are the principal difference between existing and future airport access conditions. Concepts have been identified for improved airport access and commuter routing to/ from the north on Airport Parkway and alternate concepts are being considered for Airport Drive. These or any other study area roadway or intersection improvement have not been developed beyond, or even approved, at the concept level. These and other considerations are part of other planning studies. Future traffic volumes relating to airport and non airport growth are discussed in this section. For analysis purposes, design hour volumes have been calculated for future year 2011 and 2016 scenarios which correspond to the completion of Phase 1 of the proposed expansion and five years following the Phase1 completion. 4.1 EXPECTED DEVELOPMENT UNRELATED TO THE AIRPORT Stantec researched the existence of developments other than the airport that may contribute to increased or changed traffic volumes in the study area and learned from the South Burlington Planning Department that there are no approved developments and no approved roadway improvements in the area at this time. 4.1.1 Background Traffic Growth While there are no specific approved projects that will generate additional traffic in this area, according to the Vermont Agency of Transportation, regional traffic growth is expected to increase about 5 percent over the next ten years. Accordingly an annual growth rate has been applied to account for growth until the year 2016. 4.2 FUTURE "NO BUILD" TRAFFIC VOLUMES For analyses comparison purposes that enable the review of future conditions with and without the growth of the airport to 2011 and 2016, future "No Build" traffic volumes have been prepared for each future year condition. These "No Build" scenarios reflect the regional growth without consideration of airport growth under design hour volume conditions. The 2011 and 2016 No Build Design Hour Volume conditions are presented on Figures 4 and 5. d1d v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study - air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 4.25 Airport Drive Extension L 1 0 (N It 12 Airport Park and White Street .J : L. 12 Ride Lot 0--t'Itr' 2— 361 -4 cO Maryland Street �L83 0 ,J 1 212 0 -t '1 t OZ ° U) U) 0 m LO t �0 L4 o CD m U') N f 1 Airport Road .J L. 2 77 ' t f 1 U� N (D V (D 31 Z (D r L 234 Lo °i °' 850 Airport Employee Parking Lot Airport Circle Airport Facility Parking Lot Williston Road .J L. 292 Williston Road 642 '1 t r' 489 0 rn 112 Z uO v N Kennedy Drive Burlington Burlington International Airport Traffic Study 195310247 3/1 2011 Evening Design Hour Volumes (NO BUILD) Airport Parking Garage Figure 4 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT U S A. Tel 8 Tel 802 864 0223 Fax 802 864.0165 5tanwc5 www. stantec_ com South Burlington Burlington International Airport Traffic Study 195310247 Airport Drive Extension t 1 o N It 13 Airport Park and White Street .J 1 L. 13 Ride Lot 0`1trr 2cc) L'� 370 Z Maryland Street �t 86 0 .� 218 0 -t f 0� O1 oo�, t a oo Wn N 1 Airport Road .J 4 L. 2 79 -t `1 f r 1�a0`° 32 Z m N ao t- 240 Lco . N 873 Williston Road .J t. r 299 66- t r 502 — °' N o 115 -1 Kennedy Drive 2016 Evening Design Hour Volumes (NO BUILD) Airport Employee Parking Lot Airport Circle Airport Facility Parking Lot Williston Road Airport Parking Garage Figure 5 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive. lv/ South Burlington, VT U S.A Tel 8 Tel 02 864.0223 c�,� Fax 802.864 0165 nwc www stantec.com Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Future Access Conditions June 5, 2009 4.3 AIRPORT TRAFFIC GROWTH DURING COMMUTER PEAK HOUR BTV has experienced growth in passenger service which has resulted in increased traffic volumes. Independent of this study, the airport is undertaking a master planning study and reviewing a full range of considerations regarding the future air travel market area and BTU's future role in that market. The master plan includes a forecast4 of the enplanements considering the BTV future market share and annual growth of 3.2 percent. 4.3.1 New Airport Trips Of the four airport peak periods, the late afternoon period overlapping the commuter peak period is most critical. On November 19 & 20, 2008, the observed traffic volumes at the airport included 187 entering vehicles and 249 exiting vehicles between 4:30 PM and 5:30 PM. Future growth in enplanements is projected at 3.2 percent annually per the ongoing Airport Master Plan studies. This is estimated to yield a 29 percent increase over existing traffic volume levels. This translates to an additional 125 peak hour vehicles by the year 2016, of which, 53 are entering vehicles and 72 are exiting vehicles. Figure 6 shows the distribution of new airport trips expected by the year 2016. 4.4 FUTURE "BUILD" TRAFFIC VOLUMES Accordingly, the net increase in airport traffic volumes for the 2011 and the 2016 future conditions have been added to the "No Build" traffic volume networks to derive 2011 and 2016 Build condition networks as represented in Figures 7, and 8. Based on the November 19 and 20, 2008 traffic counts and future volume projections at the study area intersections during the 4:30 to 5:30 PM peak hour, the percentage of existing and future airport traffic through these intersections were estimated as presented in Table 8. Table 8 Airport Traffic Volume Percentages 4 Campbell and Paris Engineers Memo dated January 2009 to Burlington International Airport RE: Forecast Letter Report - Burlington International Airport. dtd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 4.28 Airport Drive Extension i 0 0 00 0 Airport Park and White Street .J L. r 0 Ride Lot o 0 --t'1 42/0 t r' 0 � Noo 22 t 20 28% oN-O Maryland Street .1 V 52 72% 0 -f '-1 t 0-4 0 0 42% 4 N N U) N t r- 0 9% 90 4D t-0 o r- v 0 '- 0 Airport Road .J L. r o 3-t 'l 1 r h 0 CDN 0 6% 0 Z 8% 28% 26%n it... Airport Employee Parking Lot Airport Circle Airport Facility Parking Lot t9A17% co N - - 0 Williston Road .l 1 L. �- 0 Williston Road 31 '1 t f 6% C90y 0 �2 0 0-1 Kennedy Drive 30% Burlington Burlington International Airport Traffic Study 195310247 3/1 Airport Generated New Design Hour Volumes 2008-2016 Airport Parking Garage Figure 6 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive. tov South Burlington, VT U.S.A. 05403 Tel. 802 864.0223 Fax. 802.864.0165 Stalnw www stantec.com Burlington Burlington International Airport Traffic Study 1195310247 3/1 Airport Drive Extension L 1 O N T 12 White Street .J 4 L. 12 0 -t t r- 2 -, a '0 369 Z Maryland Street " L 90 C t 0 .t 230 0 -t 'l t 0 i ° LO LO Airport Park and Ride Lot Airport Employee Parking Lot Airport Circle L 4 CO U' N 1 Airport Facility Airport Road .- L. r 2 Parking Lot 78 --t-1 t r' 1 � - `° 31 Z ,r M L 237 Ln NN m 850 Williston Road .J 1 L. r 292 Williston Road 65 -t `1 t r' 489 + O N rn 112 Z Lo It N Kennedy Drive 2011 Evening Design Hour Volumes Airport Parking Garage Figure 7 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive tu South Burlington, VT U S.A Tel 8 Tel 02.864 0223 Fax 802.864 0165 Stan 8C www stantec.com Airport Drive Extension L 1 o N v 13 White Street .1 -- 13 02 '1 t F' L CO `n r 392 Z `0 Maryland Street O L 106 M t 0 .J 1 270 0 -t '1 t 0 Z a, u� C t4 coo Lo N 1 Airport Road J 2 82`1 t F 1 v o ID 32 Z n Airport Park and Ride Lot Airport Employee Parking Lot Airport Circle Airport Facility Parking Lot N r L 249 N c 873 Williston Road .J I-. 299 . Williston Road 69 --t 'I t f 502 115 Z Kennedy Drive Burlington Burlington International Airport Traffic Study 1195310247 2016 Evening Design Hour Volumes Airport Parking Garage Figure 8 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain DriveSouth vv� Burlington, VT U.S.A 03 Tel. Tel. 802 864 0223 8 Stamm Fax. 802 864.0165 www stantec com Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Analyses June 5. 2009 Continued BTV growth through the years 2011 and 2016 will increase traffic volumes levels on Airport Drive as has been described in previous sections. That increase may have operational consequences at area intersections depending on the existing conditions and the non -airport traffic growth. To review future condition operations, Stantec has prepared a comparison of existing and future conditions analyses. These analyses differ depending on whether the intersection is signalized or not signalized. In addition, at selected unsignalized intersections, signal warrant and left turn lane warrant conditions have been reviewed. 5.1 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Intersection capacity analysis has been prepared for existing conditions and future conditions with and without consideration of continued airport growth through 2011 and 2016. Through this comparison any impacts attributable to the airport growth can be identified where Build condition analysis produce reduced results as compared to No Build conditions. 5.1.1 Level of Service Criteria Stantec has identified the existing and future traffic volumes and for the purpose of conducting capacity analysis and has inventoried the geometric and operational control features of the study area intersections. Using computer software programs based on standard analysis methods stated in the Highway Capacity Manuals, Stantec has conducted intersection capacity analyses. Driver delay is the principle measure of the capacity analysis. Level of Service is the conventional approach to assessing the measured delay and the operation of an intersection and the movements through it. Level of Service applies to both unsignalized and signalized intersections although there are very different operational features. In particular, an unsignalized intersection Level of Service designation relates only to the minor street volumes attempting access to the major road and the left turns from the major road; the major street through volumes are assumed to experience no delay. At a signalized intersection, movements on all approaches are delayed and therefore included in the calculation of the overall intersection level of service. The intersections were analyzed according to the methodologies of the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 as replicated by the Synchro (Version 7.0) software developed by Trafficware. 5.1.2 Unsignalized Intersections Capacity and Level of Service (LOS) calculations pertaining to unsignalized intersections address the quality of service for those vehicles turning into and out of intersecting side streets. The availability of adequate gaps in the traffic stream on the major street limits the potential capacity for vehicle movements to and from the minor approach. LOS is denoted by a letter grade ranging from A through F that corresponds to ranges of average vehicle delay. At 5 Highway Capacity Manual 2000, FHWA, Washington, D.C., 2003 dtd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 5.32 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT I 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Analyses June 5, 2009 unsignalized intersections, LOS applies to specific minor turning movements and collectively on a minor approach as the average delay per vehicle. The six levels of service for unsignalized intersections may be described as follows: • LOS A represents a condition of little or no delay to minor street traffic. • LOS B represents a condition with short delays to minor street traffic. • LOS C represents a condition with average delays to minor street traffic. • LOS D represents a condition of long delays to minor street traffic. • LOS E represents operating conditions at or near capacity level. • LOS F represents a condition where minor street demand volume exceeds capacity of an approach lane with extreme delays resulting. The LOS of unsignalized intersections is determined by application of a procedure described in ( the Highway Capacity Manual 2000. The procedure accounts for lane configuration on the I minor and major approaches, conflicting traffic volumes, and type of control (STOP versus YIELD). The theoretical maximum or capacity flow of vehicles for each minor approach lane is calculated based on gap -analysis procedure. Delays are calculated based on the traffic volume demand on each approach. Table 11 presents the relationship between delay and LOS. Table 9 Standard ranges of Delay for each Intersection Level of Service Unsignalized Signalized Level of Intersections Intersections Service Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) 1 1• 1 > 10.0• < 20.0 1• 1 > 20.0• < 35.0 1 and < 35.0 1 • 1 1 and < 50.0 > 55.0 and < :11 11 :11 I5.1.3 Overall Intersection Analysis Summary The following is a summary of the overall level of service for the Airport Drive intersections. Existing conditions analyses are presented for appreciation of the current levels of service for I did v \1953\acbve\195310247\aviaGon\permits\traffic access study -air qua permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 5.33 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Analyses June 5, 2009 comparison with No Build and Build conditions for 2011 and 2016. Tables 11 and 12 provide level of service summaries for signalized and unsignalized intersections respectively. o At the signalized Williston Road intersection, the analyses indicate overall level of service will degrade from LOS E under existing conditions to LOS F by the year 2016 with or without the airport growth. o Of the unsignalized Airport Drive intersections, the two involving no turns onto Airport Drive will continue to operate at Level of Service A or B through the year 2016. Table 10 Signalized Intersection Analysis Summary Table 11 Unsignalized Intersection Analysis Summary ��• . AirportBuil Build • Comments Intersection AM PM Build Build White Street D F F F F F Unsignalized Airport Exit B F F F F F Unsignalized Employee Parking lot A A A A A A Unsignalized Airport Entrance A A A A A B Unsignalized Airport Road B F F F F F Unsignalized 5.2 TURN LANE WARRANTS REVIEW Turn lane requirements were reviewed at each of the Airport Drive intersections. In general, the nature of most of the intersections precludes the need for turning lanes. dtd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 5.34 Stantec BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Analyses June 5, 2009 o At White Street the northbound lane effectively becomes a left turn lane as most vehicles turn left and have the right of way. The single lane approach on White Street is 99 percent right turns and a second lane would not significantly improve the approach operation. o At the Exit Driveway and Maryland Street too few vehicles turn into Maryland Street to warrant turn lanes. o At the employee parking lot, employee vehicles are turning into the lot during times when through traffic volumes are not sufficiently high to warrant a turn lane. o At the Airport Entrance there is an existing left turn lane and right turn lane. o At the Airport Road intersection, Airport Drive northbound left turns exceed the left turn warrant threshold. 5.3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS REVIEW Conditions warranting traffic signals were reviewed at three locations. o At the White Street intersection, the signal warranting conditions do not exist due to the inconsistency of the volume levels of conflicting movements such as that turning from the park and shuttle lot. Yield control on the eastbound approach has produced repeated crashes for several years between eastbound through and northbound left turn vehicles. Continuing to allow the northbound approach to be free of control and all of the other three approaches under STOP sign control (including the eastbound approach) is recommended. o At the Airport Egress Driveway intersection with Airport Drive, traffic volumes exceed the Warrant 1 Condition A vehicular volume thresholds for single lane major road approaches (500 vph - 8 hours) and a two-lane minor road approach (200 vph - 8 hours). This intersection is also expected to experience LOS F delays under 2011 and 2016 conditions. o At the Airport Road intersection with Airport Drive, peak hour traffic volumes may exceed traffic signal Warrant 1 Condition B - vehicular volume thresholds for single lane major road approaches (750 vph - 8 hours) and a single lane minor road approach (75 vph - 8 hours) djd v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 5.35 � UM7 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2009 TRAFFIC STUDY Summary of Findings and Recommendations June 5, 2009 6.0 Summary of Findings and Recommendations 6.1 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are provided based on the traffic study which considered existing conditions and future conditions with and without airport traffic growth. 6.1.1 Recommended Improvements Considering Airport Volume Growth As analysis indicates congestion and delays on the airport exit driveway during the future design hour conditions; therefore, a near term improvement of the airport exit driveway/Airport Drive intersection is recommended. Traffic signal control may be a solution; however, the existing hourly volume levels during an average day on Airport Drive do not exceed the signal warrant thresholds required during eight hours of the average day. Based on assumed annual growth, warrants may be met by the year 2014. 6.1.2 Recommended Study Area Improvements Irrespective of Airport Traffic Increases At the Airport Road and Airport Drive intersection, as indicated by the capacity analysis movements from Airport Drive are delayed. Airport Road left turns outnumber the right turns and are, in general, vehicles that have taken an alternate routing to the eastbound left turn from Williston Road. While volumes appear to be close to that warranting a traffic signal, the prospect of additional delay to Airport Drive traffic should be considered as well as delay to Airport Road left turns under signal control coordinated with and in deference to the Williston Road signal operation. Adding a right turn lane to Airport Drive without signalization would reduce delay. Also, the northbound left turn volume at this intersection exceeds the warranting threshold for a left turn lane. While this condition does result in occasional delay to northbound traffic flow, a left turn lane at this location is not recommended. At the White Street intersection, conduct a historical review of the control measures employed at this intersection and the crash rates experienced with each. Yield control on the eastbound approach has produced repeated crashes for several years between eastbound through and northbound left turn vehicles. Continuing to allow the northbound approach to be free of control and all of the other three approaches under STOP sign control (including the eastbound approach) is recommended. At the Williston Road and Kennedy Drive intersection with Airport Drive, experiences overall LOS E under existing conditions and projects to LOS F by 2016 with or without airport growth. Improvements are recommended including the long term roundabout alternative identified in the US Route 2 Corridor Study as well as other additional signalized alternatives that address the heavy demand of northbound left turns and on the westbound approach. A sensitivity analysis that illustrates the ability to improve the approach, movement and overall Level of Service is presented in Figure 9. This could guide the selection of alternative signalized measures to meet the peak periods demands of which the airport traffic represents approximately 13 percent. d1d v \1953\active\195310247\aviation\permits\traffic access study -air qual permit analysis\report 06-08-09 doc 6.36 Alternative Intersection Imorovements ALTERNATIVE Williston Road Williston Road Kennedy Drive Airport Drive Overall Approach Movement Change Volume(vph) Eastbound Left Thru Right Westbound Left Thru Right Northbound Left Thru Right Southbound Right Thru Left LOS 69 502 115 299 873 249 519 444 307 217 222 64 Delay Existing Lane Use —► + F LOS C C D D F F D D D F 91.3 NL Lane Use -� + �� t F* .,-I 1 E LOS C C D D D F D D D F 57.0 NT/R Lane Use LOS C C D D F F D D F 85.9 N LT Lane Use Los C C D D D F D D F 51.6 NT Lane Use IV-']tt r�I 1 4E LOS C C C D F D D D D D 79.2 WT Lane Use + 'V— t I LOS C C D C C F F D C 75.8 N L+WT Lane Use + ID IE D LOS C C D C C F E D C 49.1 NT/R+WT Lane Use + LOS C C D C C F E C D C 70.6 NLT+WT Lane Use + '1'1 t t ► �I 1 L. D LOS C C D C C C E C D E 43.8 NT+WT Lane Use i i— f t t F*♦I + I E LOS C C D C C F C D E 68.1 N&STR Lane Use + � � �} 'I� F LOS D D F E F F E E 89.1 N&STR+WT Lane Use + L *1 *T f * ► E LOS D D F D D F F F I E 72.2 N8�$LT Lane Use �- �t t F* L* E LOS D D F E F F E E 58.6 N&SLT+WT Lane Use F*♦I 1 LOS D D F D D F F F E 53.3 South Burlington, Shelburne Road Signal Optimization Plan 195310247 Alternatives Analysis Summary Williston Road / Airport Drive I Kennedy Drive Figure 9 Stantec Consulting Services Inc 55 Green Mountain Drive IV; South Burlington, VT, U.S.d Tel 02 864.0223 Tel 8 S}anwc Fax. 802.864 0165 No Text APPENDIX Airport Trip Generation Network Diagrams Williston Road Airport Road Airport Entrance Employee Lot Airport Exit White Street AIRPORT TRIP GENERATION Stantec ills to2.41 TlZt? Gp-► cal Am ot-1 C �+L cu L.AT�otit ftoQS D CovC-jTS FA- rjbgelD �ti-+' l2 1 N Cn M Olt c�r'z'TS co:ntp Z,G1P� , 4'34 T7M Y d' A �"' ►o -f�czC Sit. TrLZ Se•!. TW P �. !-7 u��q a►kRt�[' 'ZgAT em%?YrE I,ai CaaFC K SE'ASo+sAl \[AR cP't1�W %�,2. P?SS�GtR. CA(.,t - ASov6 drtG . ' �AOQv 4 24 436 `NTIK e+fLaartT Gevwaxw'D Sfvw#*AAL Ti-cP5 43rb�,sisn►) t�PS Designed by: Checked by: tDV Q5 l - I '.A 2007 CTC Summary " Seasonal Adjustment 30th Eight Factor Regression #1 High High Consecutive Site ID Route Town Group Group AADT AAWDT Hour Hour %k High Hours %MCV P6A018 US7 Leicester 2 C 6500 6900 768 695 10.7 5179 11.5 P6A019 VT22A Orwell 2 C 3400 3400 541 405 11.9 3427 13.2 P6A041 US7 Nnw Hnvnn 2 C 0900 7400 850 7.17 10.8 5776 11.2 P( A111 VT22A Addison 2 C 4800 4800 663 551 11.5 4294 13.8 F'86026 VT11 Winhall 5 C 4100 4000 956 661 16.1 5413 16.3 P66037 US7 Pownal 2 C 7400 7600 1052 814 11 6914 11 P66041 VT9 Bennington 2 X 6200 6400 1111 741 12 7195 12.8 P613061 MC0118 Winhall 6 E 3200 3100 1206 804 25.1 6810 37.7 P66282 US7 Shaftsbury 2 C 6200 6400 1020 755 12.2 6126 8.8 P6B379 VT279 Bennington 2 C 5100 5200 862 643 12.6 5104 5.2 P6C002 191 Sheffield 4 A 4700 4900 826 644 13.7 5826 18.9 P6C007 VT15 Hardwick 2 C 4600 4900 572 515 11.2 3645 13.4 P6C015 193 Waterford 4 A 5800 5700 1032 806 13.9 7298 18.6 P6C043 VT114 Burke 2 E 3600 3600 619 455 12.6 4178 10.8 P6D001 VT127 Burlington 3 B 15400 16600 1738 1627 10.6 10478 6.4 P6D040 US7 Colchester 3 B 14500 15500 1853 1670 11.5 11216 8.5 P613059 MCO223 Bolton 6 C 1100 990 489 325 29.5 2985 35.1 P6D091 189 South Burlington 3 A- 53300 " 57500`' 6242 6800 10.9 10081 8 P613092 189 Colchester 3 A 29800 32200 3674 3427 11.5 22051 9.8 --�1 P6D099 1189 South Burlington 3 A 39400 42800 4343 4150 10.5 29880 5 P613129 VT2A Williston 3 B 18300 19100 1909 1795 9.8 13532 7 P613132 US7 Charlotte 2 C 11200 11700 1305 1160 10.4 8188 9.6 P6D277 US7 Shelburne 3 B 17500 18200 1720 1598 9.1 12031 6.9 P6D444 FAU5040 Burlington 3 B 12500 13800 1359 1280 10.2 9504 5.4 P6D530 VT289 Essex 3 B 14900 15800 1715 1630 10.9 10321 7.1 POD531 VT289 Essex 3 B 4900 5200 811 637 13 3966 10.4 J P6E020 US2 Concord 4 C 3100 3200 492 420 13.5 3441 20.3 P617029 U37 Georgia 3 C 3600 3900 561 426 11.8 2875 11.2 P6F096 189 Swanton 1 A 9800 10200 1404 1057 10.8 8510 13.2 P6G005 US2 South Hero 4 C 8900 9100 1426 1053 11.8 7881 18.5 P6G025 US2 Grand Isle 4 C 3000 3100 547 473 15.8 3688 29.9 P61-047 VT12 Elmore 2 C 1000 1100 177 144 14.4 903 17.6 P6L057 VT108 Stowe 6 C 3500 3300 1139 850 24.3 6844 30.5 P6N001 191 Fairlee 1 A 9800 10200 1280 1151 11.7 8480 13.4 P6N002 191 Bradford 1 A 7900 8300 1085 933 11.8 7174 14 P6P004 VT100 Westfield 2 C 2300 2300 323 250 10.9 1964 11.8 P6P052 NONE Jay 6 E 690 520 646 355 50.7 2771 66.9 P6P082 191 Derby 4 A 3200 3300 606 452 14.1 4086 21 P6P215 US5 Derby 2 C 11600 12600 1409 1282 11.1 10025 8.8 P6R001 U84 Fair Haven 1 A 7200 6900 1111 882 12.3 7304 11.8 P6R005 US4 Killington 5 C 9600 9400 1646 1206 12.6 9320 10.3 P6R017 VT103 Mt Holly 2 C 5100 5200 740 551 10.8 4150 8.5 P6R022 US7 Rutland Town 3 B 22600 24100 2437 2249 10 17101 6.2 P6R054 MC0159 Killington 6 E 4900 4600 1472 991 20.2 7520 36.2 P6R084 US4 West Rutland 1 C 13900 14600 1654 1446 10.4 10983 7.8 P6R100 US7 Brandon 2 C 6000 6300 720 642 10.7 4791 119 P6W002 189 Berlin 1 A 21300 22500 3433 2719 12.8 20436 13.1 P6W004 VT62 Barre City 3 B 11900 13200 1504 1371 11.5 8987 4.4 P6W006 US302 Berlin 3 B 14100 15400 1579 1480 10.5 10990 6.4 P6W014 US302 Barre City 3 B 16100 16800 1326 1274 7.9 9790 5.2 P6W024 US2 Montpelier 3 8 11800 13000 1770 1327 112 10531 8.5 P6W055 VT17 Fayston 5 E 1100 980 392 268 24.4 2133 21.2 P6W062 MCO203 Warren 6 E 2500 2400 963 641 25.6 4997 30.1 P6W088 189 Middlesex 1 A 26100 27300 3872 3159 12.1 23073 10.5 P6W089 189 Waterbury 1 A 25300 26500 3448 2889 11.4 21335 10.3 P6W227 VT100 Waitstield 5 C 5400 5500 914 669 12.4 5383 9 2007 Monthly Factors by Site i MAWDT to AADT Seasonal Adjustment Factor I Site ID Route Town Group Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec P6F096 189 Swanton 1 1.12 1.13 1,05 1.01 0.93 0.86 0.82 079 0,90 0.90 1.01 1.14 P6N001 191 Fairlee 1 1.14 1.09 1.05 104 0.92 0.87 0.84 0.79 0.88 0.90 100 1.11 P6N002 191 Bradford 1 1,16 1.12 1.08 1.05 0.93 0.88 0.85 0.80 0.87 0.88 0.98 1.13 P6R001 U34 Fair Haven 1 1.21 1 14 1.12 1 14 1.07 0.93 0.90 0.84 0.99 1.04 1.12 1.15 P6R084 U84 West Rutland 1 1,04 1.03 0.97 0.99 095 0.90 0.89 0.85 0.88 0.91 1.00 1.07 P6W002 189 Berlin 1 1.12 1.18 0.99 101 0.93 0.85 0.86 0.80 0.88 0.87 0.98 1.10 P6W088 189 Middlesex 1 1.08 1.07 1.02 0.99 0.92 0.88 0.87 0.82 0.89 0.90 1.02 1.09 P6W089 189 Waterbury 1 1.09 1.08 1.01 1.03 0 96 0.89 0.87 082 0.91 0.91 1.02 1.11 P6X071 191 Vemon 1 1.18 1.05 1.14 1.20 1.10 1.03 0.97 0.90 1.04 1.04 1.11 1.11 P6X072 191 Brattleboro 1 1.11 1.02 1.05 1.07 1.00 0.95 0.92 0.85 0.93 0.95 101 1.10 P6X073 191 Putney 1 113 1.02 1.09 1.13 1.04 1.03 0.92 0.87 1.00 0.97 1.05 1.09 P6X074 191 Rockingham 1 1,14 103 110 1.16 1.08 0.99 0.93 0.87 1.00 0.99 1.08 1.13 P6Y001 189 Bethel 1 1.22 1.15 1.12 1.09 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.82 0,93 0.95 1.05 1.18 P6Y002 191 Norwich 1 1.10 1.07 1.04 1.04 0.92 0.88 0.85 0.81 0.88 0.88 0.97 1.10 P6Y085 189 Hartford 1 1.16 1.14 1.13 1.10 1.00 0.91 0.88 0.82 0.93 0.94 1.04 1.13 Group 1 Avg 1.13 1.09 1.06 1.07 0.98 0.92 0.88 0.83 0.93 0.94 1.03 1.12 P6A018 US7 Leicester 2 1.09 1.10 1.04 0.97 0.91 0.87 0.87 0.81 0.86 0.85 0.96 1.07 P6A019 VT22A Orwell 2 1.20 1.18 1.11 1.03 0.94 0.88 0.91 0.84 0.97 0.97 1.03 1.12 P6A041 US7 New Haven 2 1.04 1.09 1.02 0.98 0.87 0.85 0.87 0.81 0.86 0.86 0.97 1.07 P6A111 VT22A Addison 2 1.18 1.19 1.12 1.05 0.95 0.87 0.86 0.83 0.94 0.95 1.05 1.13 P613037 US7 Pownal 2 1.13 1.12 1.07 1.02 0.93 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.90 0.89 1.01 1.11 I P613041 VT9 Bennington 2 1.24 1.02 1.00 1.05 0.96 0.88 0.88 0.84 0.93 0.89 1.03 1.10 P6B282 US7 Shaftsbury 2 1.01 0.92 1.02 1.11 1.01 0.96 0.90 0.87 0.92 0.90 1.04 1.07 P613379 VT279 Bennington 2 1.05 1.03 1.03 1.08 1.01 0.95 0.94 0.92 0.97 0.94 0.99 0.99 P6C007 VT15 Hardwick 2 1.09 1.11 1.04 1.01 0.88 0.84 0.83 0.81 0.85 0.88 1.00 1.12 P6C043 VT114 Burke 2 1.15 0.93 1.01 1.15 1.00 0.96 0.94 0.89 0.93 0.96 1.10 1.01 P613132 US7 Charlotte 2 1.07 1.08 1.04 0.99 0.91 0.89 0.87 0.84 0.93 0.91 1.00 1.04 P6L047 VT12 Elmore 2 1.09 1.14 1.08 1.01 0.83 0.80 0.80 0.77 0.81 0.81 1.03 1.14 P6P004 VT100 Westfield 2 1.13 1.12 1.09 1.07 0.94 0.87 0.85 0.87 0.90 0.93 1.03 1.10 P6P215 US5 Derby 2 1.03 1.03 0.98 0.95 0.87 0.83 0.83 0.84 0.89 0.91 0.98 1.02 P6R017 VT103 Mt Holly 2 1.06 1.04 1.05 1.11 1.01 0.91 0.90 0.86 0.91 0.94 1.02 1.03 P6R100 US7 Brandon 2 1.09 1.09 1.04 0.96 0.91 0.86 0.86 0.83 0.89 0.89 1.04 1.13 P6X008 US5 Rockingham 2 1.01 1.01 0.97 0.98 0.88 0.84 0.88 0.86 0.89 0.88 0.98 1.05 P6X147 VT142 Vernon 2 1.06 1.06 0.99 0.91 0.74 0.89 1.00 0.96 0.89 0.98 1.09 1.20 P6X148 US5 Guilford 2 1.16 1.28 1.25 1.23 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.88 0.96 1.00 1.14 1.29 P6Y031 US5 Norwich 2 1.15 1.14 1.10 0.97 0.86 0.81 0.83 0.83 0.91 0.92 1.07 1.10 P6Y119 US4 Hartford 2 1.11 1.08 1.07 1.09 0.98 0.94 0.85 0.83 0.91 0.89 1.08 1.08 Group 2 Avg 1.10 1.08 1.05 1.03 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.85 0.91 0.91 1.03 1.09 P6D001 VT127 Burlington 3 1,00 0.97 0.96 0.93 0.88 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.91 0.98 1.07 P613040 US7 Colchester 3 1.04 1.06 1.00 0.97 0.87 0.83 0.85 0.86 0.91 0.91 0.97 1.03 P6D061 US2 Williston 3 1.12 0.98 0.99 0.92 0.87 0.84 0.86- 0.84 0.91 0.88 0.94 0.94 r..� P6D091 189 South Burlington 3 1.05 1,04 0.99 0.96 0.92 0.86 0.85- 0.82 0.88 0.88 0.94 1.01 .t- P6D092 189 Colchester 3 1.05 1.08 0.99 0.96 0.91 0.85 0.83 0.80 0.88 0.89 0.93 1.04 1 P613099 1189 South Burlington 3 0.99 1.01 0.95 0.94 0.90 0.86 0.89 • 0.85 0.89 0.88 0.94 0.97 I P613129 VT2A Williston 3 1.06 1.07 1.00 0.96 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.93 0.92 0.98 1.03 P6D277 US7 Shelburne 3 1.03 1.05 1.00 0.96 0.91 0.88 0.92 0.88 0.94 0.92 0.97 0.98 P61D444 FAU5040 Burlington 3 0.95 0.97 0.92 0.90 0.85 0.81 0.86 0.89 0.88 0.89 0.94 0.97 P6D530 VT289 Essex 3 1.03 1.09 1.00 0.95 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.90 0.89 0.96 1.00 P6D531 VT289 Essex 3 1.07 1.10 1.02 0.98 0.85 0.87 0.84 0.85 0.88 0.87 0.99 1.06 I P61`029 US7 Georgia 3 1.04 1.08 1.01 0.95 0.85 0.81 0.84 0.84 0.87 0.89 0.99 1.01 P6R022 US7 Rutland Town 3 1.02 1.01 0.97 0.98 0.93 0.88 089 0.85 0.89 0.90 0.97 1.03 P6W004 VT62 Barre City 3 1.01 0,99 0.94 0.93 0.89 0.86 0.89 0.86 0.89 0.84 0.91 0.96 P6W006 US302 Berlin 3 1.04 1.00 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.84 0.89 0.85 0.88 0.96 1.01 0.99 P6W014 US302 Barre City 3 1.06 1.02 0.97 0.96 0.93 0.90 0.91 0.91 0.94 0.95 1.01 1.04 P6W024 U52 Montpelier 3 1.04 1.00 0.95 0.94 0.87 0.83 0.84 0.83 0.86 0.89 1.01 1.03 P6X011 US5 Brattleboro 3 1.01 0.99 0.96 0.93 0.88 0.87 0.90 0.88 0.92 0.93 0.99 1.00 P6Y033 VT10A Norwich 3 0.95 1.00 0.93 0.89 0.87 0.84 0.85 0.87 0.89 0.86 094 1.07 Group 3 Avg 1.03 1.03 0.97 0.94 0.89 0.85 0.87 0.86 0.90 0.90 0.97 1.01 P6C002 191 Sheffield 4 1.26 116 113 1.09 0.97 0.88 0.77 0.73 0.88 0.93 1.10 1.18 P6C015 193 Waterford 4 1.29 1.23 118 1.18 102 0.90 0.80 0.75 0.89 0.95 1.14 1.22 P6E020 US2 Concord 4 1.27 1.18 1.13 1 11 0.96 0.87 0.80 0.75 0.82 089 1.08 1.26 P6G005 US2 South Hero 4 1.17 1.19 1 13 1.06 0.92 082 0.77 0.76 0.86 0.92 1.06 1.18 P6G025 US2 Grand Isle 4 1.46 1.43 1 39 1.21 0.93 0.79 0.69 0.70 0.85 0.96 1A4 1.33 P6P082 191 Derby 4 121 1.21 1.13 1.06 0.96 083 073 0.70 0.88 0.95 1 14 1.27 P6X027 VT9 Wilmington 4 1.32 1.21 1.24 1.30 1.05 0.92 0.88 0.78 0.90 092 1.14 127 Group 4 Avg 1.28 1.23 1.19 1.14 0.97 0.86 0.78 0.74 0.87 0.93 1.11 1.24 I 14 I U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration March 3, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration New England Region Mr. Brian Searles Airport Director Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Searles: 12 New England Executive Park Burlington, MA 01803 The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has reviewed the forecast in the document entitled "Forecast Letter Report -Burlington International Airport" dated January 2009, from Campbell & Paris Engineers. This forecast development is associated with the Airport Master Plan project under Airport Improvement Program (AIP) number 3-50-0005-72-2008. The data reasonably represents anticipated growth for future commercial operations at Burlington International Airport using enplanement, load factor and plane size forecast. FAA accepts these forecasts, Sincerely, 4.1 Lisa J. Lespelance Airport P1arYner Cc: Bob McEwing, Burlington International Airport Daniel McKinney, Campbell & Paris Engineers CAMPBELL EN To: Burlington International Airport From: Campbell & Paris Engineers Date: January 2009 RE: Forecast Letter Report- Burlington International Airport & PARI S G I N E E R S Future commercial operations were forecasted for Burlington International Airport (BTV) using enplanement, load factor, and plane size forecast. Three enplanement forecasts were performed as part of the 2009 Master Plan Update. These forecasted enplanements from 2009 until 2030 and utilized data from airport management, the aviation industry, FAA, and U.S. Census. Methodologies for each forecast are outlined within this document. A) Enplanements The number of annual enplanements at Burlington International Airport through 2030 were forecasted using three separate methodologies to create low, medium, and high growth scenarios; in order to then provide a recommended enplanement growth scenario. The steps taken to perform this forecast are as follows: w 1. 2008 Enplanements: The monthly historical enplanement data provided by airport management was analyzed to identify growth trends. The 2008 data provided information for January through - October and the November and December enplanement figures were extrapolated using average f percent change over the past five years (2008-2003). Using this method the total number of 2008 enplanements is estimated to be 762,852 persons. Historically, enplanements at Burlington International Airport have experienced a healthy growth. From 2000 to 2008, they increased at a compounded annual rate of growth (CARG) of 6.77%. This rate of growth was higher between 2007 and 2008 when total enplanements increased by 7.84%. Nationally enplanements grew at 3.3% in 2007 with fluctuations between -0.4% growth and 7.5% growth over the past 6-years (FAA 2008-2025 Aerospace Forecast). The BTV enplanement growth rate has surpassed the national average and is currently growing at more than twice the rate of the w national average. It should also be noted that the historical BTV data provides a good baseline of growth information as it includes both periods of low to no growth (after the events of September 11, 2001) as well as periods of moderate and high growth. It is reasonable to assume that these trends of ups and downs with commercial aviation will continue and that this past growth is indicative of the types of change that can be anticipated to continue to occur. Table 1 displays the monthly enplanement information. Table 1: Historical BTV Enplanements 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan 31,342 40,429 36,904 42,253 44,936 50,981 53,219 54,643 56,751 Feb 35,601 42,924 42,147 40,973 49,395 55,413 54,003 51,231 57,216 Mar 36,252 45,429 43,643 44,461 49,788 57,525 60,089 58,597 60,116 Apr 35,781 47,045 46,957 42,282 49,448 57,448 55,794 60,728 59,478 May 32,480 43,939 42,202 40,999 44,519 53,013 52,330 55,496 58,116 Jun 35,383 46,019 46,094 46,131 53,346 58,033 56,325 58,429 65,845 Jul 37,462 51,376 52,489 50,308 58,934 66,383 67,302 67,704 79,154 Aug 40,253 57,755 56,386 53,726 65,264 66,043 64,774 68,922 79,304 Sep 36,989 30,882 44,477 45,340 51,443 55,051 52,335 57,621 63,544 Oct 49,316 43,314 52,134 53,720 65,441 64,934 65,032 65,670 69,556 Nov 40,364 34,769 40,859 43,376 51,631 52,307 55,228 54,213 Dec 40,359 36,290 46,128 46,481 50,653 54,454 54,137 54,141 TOTAL 451,582 520,171 550,420 550,050 634,798 691,585 690,568 707,395 762,852 2. Forecast increase to year 2030: Using the enplanements listed in Table 1 as a baseline, three forecast scenarios (Low, Medium, and High) were generated for commercial enplanements for the period between 2009 and 2030. a) Low: This scenario assumes that the number of enplanements increase commissariat with the projected (2009-2025) annual Airport Service Area (ASA) population growth rate of 0.43%. The ASA is defined as those U.S. counties and Canadian Census Divisions whose centroid is within a 90-minute drive time from BTV. These include: Franklin, Chittenden, Addison, Grand Isle, Lamoille, and Washington counties, VT; Clinton County, NY; and the Canadian Census Divisions of Brome- Missisquoi and Le Haut -Richelieu. This scenario generates a 2030 enplanement count of 838,744, which provides for 75,892 more enplanements than the 2008 figure. While this provides for some increase, the increase is so small (10%growth over a 21 year period) that this is essentially a no growth scenario. b) Medium: This forecast is the "market share forecast" which compares the number of enplanements at BTV to the surrounding "market." For the purposes of this analysis, the market is defined as all commercial service airports within 150-nautical miles of BTV. These airports are: Albany International (ALB); Watertown International (ART); Lebanon Municipal (LEB); Manchester (MHT); Massena International (MSS); Ogdensburg International (OGS); Clinton County (PLB); Rutland State (RUT); Adirondack (SLQ Oneida County (UCA); and Montreal -Pierre Elliott Trudeau International (YUL). Enplanement data from 2000-2008 was collected for all airports, except YUL, using the FAA TAF database. BTV enplanement numbers for 2000-2008 were those supplied by airport management as listed in Table 1. 2 The medium scenario assumes that the total market remains at 2008 levels through 2009 to account for the 2008-2009 recession. In 2010, the entire market (except YUL) increases at a CARG of 2.39% (per the FAA 2010-2025 CARG for airports in the New England region). BTV, whose market share in 2008 is 7.2% of all enplanements, increases its market share by an additional 0.1% annually and reaches a 9.3% market share in 2030. This increase in market share represents the percentage of the market that BTV is "capturing" from YUL each year. YUL enplanement figures are the "remainder" from the total after the other airports are subtracted. This scenario generates a 2030 enplanement count of 1,616,400. This is 853,548 more than the 2&)8 figure. In this scenario BTV enplanements are increasing both due to the increases projected by the FAA for enplanements and also due to the increase in market share. c) High: This forecast assumes that BTV enplanements continue to increase at the historical ;/ AG of 6.77% during the short term (2009-2013), with the CARG then gradually declining to growvI ate of 2.39% by 2030 (the 2.39% growth rate is the FAA 2010-2025 CARG for enplanements it , ,e New England region, as stated in the FAA Aerospace Forecast 2008-2025). This scenario generates a 2030 enplanement count of 2,107,871. This is 1,345,019 mar than the 2008 figure. Please see Tables 2, 3, and 4 for detailed enplanement numbers for each of the abc a scenarios. Figure 1 below graphically depicts historical (2000-2008) enplanement growth at BTV is well as the growth under each forecast scenario and the FAA's TAF. Figure 1 High, Medium, and Low Forecast Scenarios for Commercial Enplanements at BTV: 2008-2030 2,500,000 2,000,000 LA = M � 1,500,000 ` M r_ 1,000,000 W a �" 500,000 ors 0 O Ln O Ln O Ln O O O i-i 1-4 N N M O O O O O O O N fV fV (V N N N ligh Scenario Medium Scenario -- -Low Scenario TAF 3 Table 2: Low Forecast Scenario 2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Jan 56,751 57,242 58,490 59,764 61,066 62,396 Feb 57,216 57,711 58,969 60,254 61,566 62,908 Mar 60,116 60,637 61,958 63,308 64,687 66,096 Apr 59,478 59,993 61,300 62,636 64,000 65,395 May 58,116 58,619 59,896 61,201 62,535 63,897 Jun 65,845 66,415 67,862 69,341 70,851 72,395 Jul 79,154 79,839 81,579 83,356 85,172 87,028 Aug 79,304 79,991 81,733 83,514 85,334 87,193 Sep 63,544 64,094 65,491 66,918 68,375 69,865 Oct 69,556 70,158 71,687 73,249 74,845 76,475 Nov 57,477 57,974 59,237 60,528 61,847 63,194 Dec 56,296 56,783 58,020 59,285 60,581 61,901 TOTAL 762,852 769,458 786,222 803,352 820,860 838,744 Table 3: Medium Forecast (Market -Share) Scenario (Medium Scenario) r 2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 ALB 1,464,443 1,499,443 1,687,399 1,898,915 2,136,944 2,404,811 ART 4,035 4,131 4,649 5,232 5,888 6,626 LES 9,324 9,547 10,744 12,090 13,606 15,311 KIHT 1,893,422 1,938,675 2,181,688 2,455,163 2,762,919 3,109,251 MSS 3,156 3,231 3,636 4,092 4,605 5,183 OGS 1,706 1,747 1,966 2,212 2,489 2,801 PLB 2,146 2,197 2,473 2,783 3,131 3,524 RUT 2,272 2,326 2,618 2,946 3,315 3,731 SLK i 2,719 2,784 3,133 3,526 3,968 4,465 UCA 453 464 522 587 661 744 BTV 762,852 791,883 951,906 1,139,606 1,359,404 1,616,400 YUL 6400,000 6,542,161 7,301,462 8,148,325 9,092,771 10,145,958 TOTAL 10,546,5287 10,798,590 12,152,196 13,675,477 15,389,702 17,318,805 Table 4: High Forecast Enplanement Scenario 2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Jan 56,751 64,695 89,012 115,068 138,451 156,811 Feb 57,216 65,225 89,741 116,011 139,585 158,096 Mar 60,116 68,531 94,290 121,891 146,660 166,109 Apr 59,478 67,804 93,289 120,597 145,104 164,346 May 58,116 66,251 91,153 117,836 141,781 160,583 Jun 65,845 75,062 103,276 133,507 160,637 181,939 Jul 79,154 90,234 124,150 160,492 193,105 218,714 Aug 79,304 90,405 124,386 160,796 193,471 219,128 Sep 63,544 72,439 99,667 128,841 155,023 175,581 Oct 69,556 79,293 109,096 141,031 169,690 192,193 Nov 57,477 65,522 90,150 116,539 140,221 158,816 Dec 56,296 64,176 88,298 114,145 137,340 155,553 TOTAL 1 762,852 869,639 1,196,509 1,546,754 1,8610068 2,107,871 3. Terminal Area Forecast: The existing TAF indicates that in 2008 there were 664,802 enplanements and by 2025 (the end of the TAF forecast years) there will be 1,043,015 enplanements. This represents a 2.55% annual growth rate. If this TAF were extended to year 2030 using the same rate of growth, enplanements would be approximately 1,182,957 in 2030. This growth in enplanements falls between the medium and low forecast scenarios. However, it should also be noted that the 2008 enplanement data for the TAF is significantly lower than actual enplanements (approximately 100,000 persons lower). Taking this into account the TAF forecast closely mirrors the medium market -share scenario. 4. Recommended Forecast: The recommended forecast for BTV is the Market Share Forecast (medium -scenario), which produces a 2030 enplanement count of 1,616,400 and sees the market share for BTV increase from 7.2% in 2009 to 9.3% in 2030. While this forecast is not as aggressive as the growth historically seen at the airport, it still anticipates substantial increases in enplanements over the planning horizon. B) Aircraft Information Using the recommended enplanements, the number of commercial operations at BTV through 2030 can be forecasted using information on load factors and average aircraft size (i.e., number of seats). Information supplied by BTV and FAA was used to determine these. 1. Load factor: The load factor is the ratio of the number of enplaned passengers to the total number of seats. In 2008, the load factor for BTV is predicted to be 75.1%. Similarly the FAA Aerospace Forecast FY 2008-2025 projects load factor for commercial air carriers to increase to 81.6% by 2025. For the purposes of this analysis it is assumed that the load factor for BTV gradually increases to 81.6% by 2025, where it will remain at that level until 2030. 2. Total seats available: The total number of seats for 2008 was obtained from data provided by BTV management. To account for the current economic recession the total number of seats available at W BTV remains the same during 2009 as in 2008. From 2010 through 2030 the number of available I seats is determined by simply dividing enplanements by load factor. 3. Average aircraft size at BTV: The baseline (2008) for average aircraft size at BTV is 68.8 seats per 1 commercial aircraft. This was found by dividing the total skewed seats per month by the number of y scheduled arrivals/departures per month for January through October 2008, and then finding the average of these totals. This baseline figure was then increased by 0.1 seat per year based on a prediction in the FAA Aerospace Forecast 2008-2025, and reaches 71.0 seats in 2030. This increase in aircraft size reflects the industry trend of moving away from smaller 40 and 50-seat regional aircraft toward larger regional jet aircraft (70 and 90-seat regional jets). Q Operations 1. Additional Operations: In order to accommodate the anticipated enplanement increases additional 7 departure operations will become necessary beginning in 2010. This figure is found by dividing the 7 number of additional seats over 2008 seats (for that year) by the average aircraft size for that year. The additional seats needed over and beyond 2008 number of seats is found by subtracting the number of seats in 2008 (1,015,351) from the number of seats for each year. By 2010 this equates to 33,003 additional seats and by 2030, 965,632 additional seats. The number of additional departure operations per year is found by dividing the additional seats needed beyond 2008 seats by the average aircraft size for that year. This equates to an additional 478 commercial departures in 2010, 3,050 additional departures in 2015, and an additional 13,596 commercial departures by 2030. Assuming that these additional operations are spread evenly over the year this translates into an additional 2 departures per day in 2010, an additional 9 departures per day in 2015, culminating in an additional 37 departures per day in 2030. 2. Total Departure Operations: For 2008 there were 14,753 commercial departures. After 2008, the figure is found by adding the 2008 figure of 14,753 to that year's additional departure operations count. That is, there are an additional 13,596 departure operations forecasted in 2030 and therefore are 28,348 by 2030. 1 6 ITable 5 presents all figures related to load factor and departure operations forecasting. Table S: Determinine Departure Onerations for BTV- 2009-7030 2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Enplanements 762,852 791,883 951,906 1,139,606 1,359,404 1,616,400 # Seats 1,015,351 1,048,354 1,227,382 1,432,100 1,666,021 1,980,983 Load Factor 0.747 0.755 0.776 0.796 0.816 0.816 Seats Needed over 2008 Seats 0 33,003 212,031 416,749 650,670 965,632 Avg. Aircraft Size at BTV 68.8 69.0 69.5 70.0 70.5 71.0 Add9 Dep. Ops Add'I Daily Ops 0 0 478 2 1 3,050 9 1 5,951 17 1 9,226 26 13,596 37 Total Dep. Ops 14,753 1 15,231 1 17,802 1 20,704 1 23,979 28,348 D) Impact of a New Commercial Airline It should be noted that the operation increases discussed in Section C do not address the potential impact of a new airline starting operations at the airfield. Instead it assumes a steady fleet -mix change (increase in aircraft size) over time. However, it is possible that a low-cost carrier will begin operation to and from Burlington International Airport during the course of the planning horizon. A Boeing 737-700, which contains 137 passenger seats, is a typical aircraft utilized by low-cost carriers. The number of seats provided by a 737-700 is significantly more than the average aircraft seat amount currently operated by aircraft at the airport and predicted, as shown in Section C. As such, if it is assumed that by 2010 a low-cost carrier begins operations with 2 departures per day and by 2015 it is operating with 4 departures a day it should impact the total forecasted operations growth by reducing the total number of aircraft departures needed in order to accommodate the enplanement growth. As shown in Table 6, if a low-cost carrier were to begin operation with 2 departures per day by 2010, this would more than accommodate the forecasted enplanement increase and could actually result in lower load -factors on all airlines or fewer aircraft departures. However, by 2015, even with additional departures (4 total) added, the forecasted enplanement 1 growth will again call for additional daily departures by the other commercial operators in order to accommodate the demand for seats. Table 6 indicates a total of 7 additional departures in 2015. Table 6: Departure Operations for BTV Assuming a new Low -Cost Airline: 2009- 2030 2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Enplanements 762,852 791,883 951,906 1,139,606 1,359,404 1,616,400 Load Factor 0.747 0.755 0.776 0.796 0.816 0.816 Seats Needed over 2008 Seats 0 33,003 212,031 416,749 650,670 965,632 Number of Low -Cost Departures 0 2 4 6 8 8 Number of Low Cost Seats Per Year 75,543 155,127 238,751 326,416 326,416 Remaining Additional Seats 0 j,5�1 56,904 177,997 324,254 639,215 Avg. Aircraft Size at BN (other than Low -Cost) 68.8 69.0 69.5 70.0 70.5 71.0 Other Add'I Dep.Ops 0 L ,, 818 2,542 4,598 9,000 Total Add'I Daily Ops (LC + Others) 0 0 7 13 21 33 E) Conclusion It is difficult to provide accurate enplanement forecast beyond the short-term horizon as unknown or unforeseen factors compound each year creating greater variance from the recommended forecast. However, for planning purposes, and for determining future facility requirements, forecasts that are within 5-10 years from present generally provide a good picture of what airports need to accommodate. Based on past growth and the recommended forecast, it appears reasonable to assume that between 7 and 9 additional departures per day will occur at Burlington International Airport by 2015 (within 6-7 years from today). Where and how these departures will be accommodated in the Terminal area will be discussed in more detail in the Master Plan report. BTV Passenger Peak Hour Trip - Vehicle Trip Relationship Month Day PM LOAD FACTOR Arrivals Departures Vehicle trips Notes "Hour" Monthly This Hour Next Hour Entering Exiting Flights Seats Est. Flights Seats Est.. Pass. Pass. A ) B ) April 17 4:28 - 5:35 74.91 6 542 406 195 390 5:30 - 6.30 74.91 1 50 37 36 18 231 408 June 12 4:26 - 5:30 72.54 3 242 176 84 169 5.30 - 6:30 72.54 1 50 36 35 17 119 186 August 21 4:25 - 5 35 82.68 3 310 256 123 246 Annual 5 30 - 6:35 82.68 4 288 238 229 114 Peak 352 360 Hour November 19 4-28 - 5:30 62.75 5 379 238 114 228 Nov. 5-30 - 6:30 62.75 4 300 188 181 90 Enter Vol 295 319 t.3 December 23 4:28 - 5:30 69.47 5 346 240 115 231 530 - 6.30 69.47 3 250 174 167 83 282 314 Arrival = A Depart = D BTV Mode Split Percentages Drive Alone 26 Enter A, D Exit A, D Entering A ( 0.48 Peak Hour Arrivals + 0.96 Next Hour Departures) A 295 = 187 : A = 0.63 Rental Car Taxi 22 8 A, D D A, D A Exiting B ( 0.96 Peak Hour Arrivals + 0.48 Next Hour Departures) B 319 = 249: B= 0.78 Limo Drop off/ pick Up 5 35 D D A A Bus 1 Entering vol. 4-30 to 5.30 PM on Nov.19, 2008 of 187 vph includes 10 to Park & Shuttle Other 3 Exiting vol. 4 30 to 5:30 PM on Nov 19, 2008 of 249 vph includes 12 veh. from P&S I Total 100 Time 16.28 16 28 1638 1640 16.50 1653 1705 NA 17.10 NA 17 02 NA 17,13 NA 17:20 NA 1720 NA 1721 NA 1723 NA 1735 1757 NA 18-05 1824 BTV Flight 1 Seating Schedule April 8, 2008 Load Factor Est Pass Aircraft Seats Load Factor Est Pass Aircraft Seats A320 150 74.91 112 E170 72 74.91 54 ERJ 50 74.91 37 A319 120 74.91 90 E 135 50 74.91 37 E 145 50 74.91 37 CRJ 50 74.91 E145 50 Arrival Peak Hour Total 542 Departure Peak Hour Total 37 1 406 CRJ 50 74.91 50 37 37 BTV Flight / Seating Schedule June 1, 2008 Aircraft Est Pass Aircraft Seats Load Factor Est Pass Seats Load Factor Time 1626 E170 72 72.54 52 16-30 NA 1630 NA 1630 NA 1650 NA 1655 E 135 50 7254 36 1705 NA 1705 NA 1709 A319 120 72.54 87 1730 NA 1735 NA 1740 NA 1750 NA 17.52 CRJ 50 72.54 18:00 NA 1814 CRJ 50 72.54 36 1815 E145 50 72.54 18.30 1839 Arrival Peak Hour Total 242 176 Departure Peak Hour Total 50 36 BTV Flight / Seating Schedule August 1, 2008 Aircraft Seats Load Factor Est Pass Aircraft Seats Load Factor Est Pass Time 16:25 NA 16 26 E170 72 82.68 60 1630 NA 16.30 NA 1630 NA 16 55 E 135 50 82.68 41 1705 NA 1712 A320 138 82.68 114 17:30 NA 1735 CRJ 50 82.68 41 17 50 135 50 82.68 41 17:54 A320 138 82.68 114 18-00 NA 18.14 CRJ 50 82.68 41 18-15 NA 18:30 NA 18.35 CRJ 50 82.68 41 Arrival Peak Hour Total 310 256 Departure Peak Hour Total 288 238 BTV Flight I Seating Schedule November 1, 2008 Aircraft Seats Load Factor Est Pass Aircraft Seats Load Factor Est Pass Time 6275 62.75 16:26 NA 16:28 E70 72 62.75 45 16.33 DH8 37 62.75 23 1642 E145 50 62.75 31 16.52 NA 16 56 A320JB 150 ' 75 94 16-58 NA 17-00 NA 17:10 NA 1716 NA CR7 70 62.75 44 17.39 NA 1740 A320 JB 150 62.75 94 18:05 E 145 50 62.75 31 18:10 CRJ 50 62.75 31 18-30 E 145 50 62.75 31 Arrival Peak Hour Total 379 238 Departure Peak Hour Total 300 188 BTV Flight / Seating Schedule December 1, 2008 Time Aircraft Est Pass Aircraft Seats Load Factor Seats Load Factor Est Pass 16:28 DH8 37 69.47 26 16-28 E70 72 69.47 50 16:42 ERJ 50 69.47 35 16:52 NA 16-52 NA 16:55 DH8 37 69.47 26 16:56 A320JB 150 69.47 104 16:59 NA 17:04 NA 17:10 NA 17:39 NA 1 17:40 A320 JB 150 69.47 104 18:05 NA 18-10 CRJ 50 69.47 35 18:30 ER4 50 69.47 35 18.33 N A Arrival Peak Hour Total 346 240 Departure Peak Hour Total 250 174 NETWORK DIAGRAMS f I BTV 2009 Traffic Study Design Hour Volume and Growth Factor Derivation Factor Value Remarks Airport Drive July 6-8, 2006 Machine Recorded Counts for AADT November 19 and 20, 2008 Manual Counts 2006 - 2008 Growth 1.011 Greater of two nearest CTC Stations ( P6D099 1-189 S Burlington); airport growth is separate 2008 - 2009 Growth 1.0053 Greater of two nearest CTC Stations P6D099 1-189 S Burlington); airport growth is separate 2008 - 2011 Growth 1.016 Greater of two nearest CTC Stations ( P6D099 1-189 S Burlington); airport growth is separate 2008 - 2016 Growth 1.043 Greater of two nearest CTC Stations ( P6D099 1-189 S Burlington); airport growth is separate DHV 1.23 13,084 (average of July 6 - 8 2006) x 0.89 (CTC P6D099) MAWDT to AADT x 0.105 (AADT to DHV) x 1.029 * (Airport Drive growth including airport from 2006 to 2008) / 1,018 vph (November 19, 2008 Peak Hour) Apply factor to November turning movement counts for DHV Airport 2006 - 2008 Growth 1.065 Paris and Campbell Forcast 2008 -2009 Growth 1.032 Paris and Campbell Forcast 2008 -2011 Growth 1.1 Paris and Campbell Forcast 2008 - 2016 Growth 1.29 Paris and Campbell Forcast * Note At Airport Road airport traffic is 36 percent of traffic volume. Airport Drive Extension L 0 o - 3 White Street .J 4 L. 6 1j'i t r 5-+ � — I- 364 Z N .,I t- 32 N � 0 Maryland Street .J 41 1 -1 t 2Z N rn r rn m v tr 00 Cl) O) Airport Park and Ride Lot Airport Employee Parking Lot Airport Parking Garage t-6 N N 0 Airport Road .J 4 L. r 1 24 'l t r' 4 y rn m LO 30 Z N Airport Circle Airport Facility Parking Lot �L94 ao N r 455 Williston Road .I L. 47 202 Williston Road 14-f `I t f 487 — m Q 290 -4 Kennedy Drive South Burlington Vermont Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive Sel International Airport 2008 Existing Morning South Burlington, VT U S A Traffic Study Peak Hour Volumes 3 8tantec Tel T864 0223 y-- Fax 802 864 0165 Stamm 195310247 3/10/2009 www.stantec com Airport Drive Extension i 0 o 4 Airport Park and White Street .j + L. 7 Ride Lot 1 -t �i t r 6— D — rn 448 Z N OL 39 N v - 0 Maryland Street .J i F 50 1 1 '1 t 2Z N V N m I Airport Employee jParking Lot Airport Parking Garage co v CO Airport Circle 1 L, r r m in co ID N CO t_ 7 CO N M cO 0 Airport Facility Airport Road .1 L. ✓•7 1 parking Lot 30 s '1 t r 5 m rn co y N � 37 Z N It 101 rn N • 490 Williston Road .1 4 L. ♦- 218 Williston Road 525 o D o 313 : N N Kennedy Drive South Burlington Vermont �! Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive Burlington International Airport 2008 Morning (VSouth Burlington, VT U S A Traffic Study Design Hour Volumes Tel 8 Tel 802 864 0223 5` ntec Fax sta tec om 195310247 3l10l2009 L� www Stantec coin Airport Drive Extension L 0 o 4 White Street .J i 1- r 7 _t",trr 6—cc) ,a) 450 Z �' Maryland Street Nt39 N 7 f 0 .J 50 1 `l t I 2 � N NN N Airport Park and Ride Lot Airport Employee Parking Lot Airport Parking Garage o t 7 N D f 0 Airport Road .J L.: 1 30 '1 t f 5 ' N o tO 37 Z d �t 102 rn N `D — 493 Airport Circle Airport Facility Parking Lot Williston Road .J i L. 219 Williston Road 15*1 t f 528 m N n O t2 O 315 Z N N Kennedy Drive South Burlington Vermont Stantec Consulting Services Inc 2009 Morning 55 Green Mountain Drive Burlington International Airport g South Burlington, VT U S A Traffic Study Design Hour Volumes 05403 (NO BUILD) �7/ Tel 802 864 0223 S� ntec Fax sta tec am 195310247 3/10/2009 la www stantec cam White Street Maryland Street Airport Road Williston Road Airport Drive Extension Kennedy Drive South Burlington Vermont Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive 2009 Morning Burlington International Airport g ✓ South Burlington, VT U S A Traffic Study Design Hour Volumes 05403 (ADDITIONAL AIRPORT VOL.) _�_ Tel 802 864 0223 SFax 802 864 0165 195310247 3/10/2009 L��+n www stantec.com No Text Airport Drive Extension IL 1 f 10 Airport Park and White Street .J L. r 10 Ride Lot 01 ~I t F' 2 y M v 289 Z m It- 67 N 0 Maryland Street t 17 0- + 0 3 " v v cO Airport Employee Parking Lot t r' ao Airport Parking Garage Airport Circle t r' m--T 0 0 0 t 3 Airport Facility Airport Road .1 : L. r 2 Parking Lot 62 '-1 t r' 1 0 0 Ln M M 25 Z Lo 0 oL213 `r2 777 Williston Road 266 Williston Road 58-t `1 t r' 446 o M 102 Z M Kennedy Drive South Burlington Vermont 4 Stantec Consulting Services Inc 55 Green Mountain Drive Burlington International Airport 2008 Existing Evening South Burlington, VT U S A Traffic Study Peak Hour Volumes 05403 � Tel 802 864 0223 Stany'� Fax 802 864 0165 195310247 3/10/2009 www Stantec com WILLISTON ROAD Airport Drive Extension t- 1 o N v 12 Airport Park and White Street .J 4 L. 12 Ride Lot 0 _f -I t r' 2���� 355 Z o t_ 82 0 Maryland Street .d 4 209 0 j '1 t OZ M o LO r Airport Employee Parking Lot t r' co 0 Airport Parking Garage i Airport Circle *r (Doo N N cc N t_ 4 a N 1 Airport Facility Airport Road .1 : L. T 2 Parking Lot 76`1 t r 1 Cl N CD � c � 31 -i to c o t 230 Ln rn ' — 837 Williston Road .0 : L. 287 Williston Road 63S `1 t " 481 — rn 110 Z N Kennedy Drive South Burlington Vermont Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive Burlington International Airport 2008 Evening South Burlington, VT U S A Traffic Study Design Hour Volumes 05403 Tel 802 864 0223 St ntm Fax 0165 sta 195310247 3/10/2009 l� www Stantectec coin Airport Drive Extension t 1 o c" v 12 Airport Park and White Street ✓• L. 12 Ride Lot 0 S '1 t r' 2,��� 357 Z O 0L82 Cl) 0 Maryland Street J ♦. ♦- 21 0_In j ~t t OZ°'� Lo L. Airport Employee Parking Lot 1 Airport Parking Garage rn u'i rn Airport Circle � 4 t r- m0) N N t_ 4 1 Airport Facility Airport Road .j L. 47 2 Parking Lot 76 'l t f 1 31 Z m �t231 ,5 ° o - 841 Williston Road .J L. �7 289 Williston Road 632 `1 t f 484 — o N rn Kennedy Drive South Burlington Vermont Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 2009 Evening 55 Green Mountain Drive Burlington International Airport g South Burlington, VT U S A Traffic Study Design Hour Volumes 05403 (NO BUILD) _ Tel 802 864 0223 Fax 802 864 0165 195310247 3/10/2009 Stantec www stantec,com No Text Airport Drive Extension L 1 o N v 12 Airport Park and White Street .j L. V 12 Ride Lot ot r- 2 360 Z m CC)L85 A o Maryland Street .J 216 0 --t t OZ ° LO In Airport Employee Parking Lot 1 L. tr 0 Airport Parking Garage �n rn Airport Circle tr 07 N N (h 0 0 L 4 co N 1 Airport Facility Airport Road .1 1 L. ;- 2 Parking Lot 76 -J '-1 t li 1 v CO ro 31 Z � Cl) L 232 vni °' o' 841 Williston Road .J 4 r 289 Williston Road 63 '-1 t r 484 o rn Kennedy Drive South Burlington Vermont Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive Burlington International Airport 2009 Evening South Burlington, VT U S A Traffic Study Design Hour Volumes 05403 Tel 802 864 0223 SnC Fax 802 864 0165 195310247 3/10/2009 www stantec com No Text White Street Maryland Street Airport Road Williston Road Airport Drive Extension Kennedy Drive South Burlington Vermont _ Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 2011 Evening 55 Green Mountain Drive Burlington International Airport g South Burlington, VT U S A Traffic Study Design Hour Volumes 05403 (ADDITIONAL AIRPORT VOL.) ///��� Tel 802 864 0223 SFax 802 864 0165 �+n 195310247 3/10/2009 l� www stantec com No Text Airport Drive Extension L 1 o N v 13 Airport Park and White Street .J j t+ 13 Ride Lot o -t'i}r 2COL� 370 Z c,It- 86 �Cl) 0 Maryland Street ..l ;'- 21 0J `1 } OZ °' � Lo Airport Employee n Parking Lot 1 L. }r N O m o M Lo M Airport Circle + L. }r co'IT 10 r2 �2 t 4 n N 1 Airport Facility Airport Road .J L. ;- 2 r Parking Lot 79 2 ~1 } 1 to o ID v co 32 i 10 N co IL 240 co . oN °' 873 Williston Road 1 L. 299 Williston Road 66 2 } r 502 ° c.0 o 115 Z v c' Kennedy Drive South Burlington Ve Burlington International Airport Traffic Study 195310247 3/1 2016 Evening Design Hour Volumes (NO BUILD) Airport Parking Garage Figure 5 / — Stantec Consulting Services Inc 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT U.S A Tel 8 Tel 802 864 0223 165 St ntec Fax sta tec om La LCi www stantec com White Street Maryland Street Airport Road Williston Road Airport Drive Extension Kennedy Drive South Burlington Vermont Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 2016 Evening 55 Green Mountain Drive Burlington International Airport g South Burlington, VT U S A Traffic Study Design Hour Volumes 05403 (ADDITIONAL AIRPORT VOL.) Tel 802 864 0223 St�anwc Fax 602 864 0165 195310247 3l10/2009 www.stantec.com Burlington Burlington International Airport Traffic Study 10247 3/1 Airport Drive Extension t_ 1 o N v 13 White Street .1 L. r 13 o s `1 t rr 2 -0 L 392 Z "D Maryland Street o t 106 o 0 .J : V 270 0 J `1 f 0Z °' oo f_ 4 Airport Road .J i 4 r 2 82 2 `1 f I" 1 v o m 32 Z N ,- t 249 ro N N 873 Williston Road .J L. 299 Williston Road 69 2 `1 f r- 502 - o 115 Z Kennedy Drive 2016 Evening Design Hour Volumes Airport Park and Ride Lot Airport Employee Parking Lot Airport Circle Airport Facility Parking Lot Airport Parking Garage Figure 8 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive V South Burlington, VT U S A 05403 Tel T8 Tel 802 864 0223 Stantm Fax 0165 www stantectec.com sta N > 13' 10' I 9' 19' o Ln CL - 4 % (DOWN) a f lid 120' - CV x _ N � _ 1 90, WILLISTON ROAD IN 2% (UP) 15" 17' 10' 9' 10' 0 z 0 (VAR I ES) m } w Z rn I w I Y NOT TO SCALE II I 20' S.th BUNrglm Vem m EXISTING CONDITION: INTERSECTION #1 SI1tEC T;� s INTERSECTION OF WILLISTON ROAD/ St.M.CmAngSuv-1. 1953f02�1 711U/1009 AIRPORT DRIVE/AND KENNEDY DRIVE °° `'° °"° A ""°' i"] Ii� 013! v � pis ""'0""` `°'" CRASH RATE WORKSHEET CITY/TOWN South Burlington COUNT DATE - 6/11/2008 UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED: �X INTERSECTION DATA ......................... . ...... ....... ...................... MAJOR STREET - Williston Road MINOR STREET(S) Airport Drive Kennedy Drive COLLISION DIAGRAM (Label Approaches) Airport Drive Southbound 1, North 61 60= �62 69 5,10,28, 32,48,56 43 J, N r � 4-- 36 O C 138 /-3,11,27 r"r-41,68 g y Vl 55 31 ��� �� 67 y 35 fA-15,25,33 --.9,39,40,42,46 4-9H�—If-51 C ; w 12,13,24 �1—► ^-153 64 ' r7 c d a 2.14 — 4,34,50 —� � /N 471� -154 'S 37 1 59,66 7,429 —► 63 70 6A 23.} t 16,17.18 44 52 * * 19,20,21 Kennedy Drive 1 1 22,58,65 Northbound Peak Hour Volumes APPROACH: DIRECTION. VOLUMES(PM) 1 2 3 1 4 5 Total NB SB EB WB Entering Vehicles 1,115 408 606 1,256 3,385 " K " FACTOR: 0.104 APPROACH ADT 32 548 ADT = TOTAL VOLT K" FACT TOTAL # OF CRASHES #OF AVERAGE # OF 70 YEARS CRASHES (A) . 23.33 CRASH RATE CALCULATION: 1.964 RATE _ (ADT-A 1,000,000 )6536566) Comments oouin tsuning[on vermom Stantec consulting Services Inc. Airport Drive at 55 Green Mountain Drive Burlington International Airport South Burlington, VT U-S A Traffic Study Williston Road _�' Tel 8 Tel 802 864 0223 StanteC Fax 802 864 0165 195310247 3/17/2009 www stantec com Crash Record Number When (Date/Time) Accident Type Injuries Weather Notes: 0414/5021-05 3/22/05, 8:02 rear end property damage only wet, slippery SB approach 0414/7436-05 1 /2/05, 14:51 sideswipe property damage only slippery, icy EB one car tried to stop for light and slid into car next to him 014/14152-05 10/20/05, 8:34 angle 1 injured wet, slippery WB thru collided with EB LT 014/15718-05 11/25/05, 10:02 angle 1 injured cloudy, wet EB thru collided with WB left turn 0414/9378-05 6/30/05. 13:20 rear end property damage only clear WB rear end 0414/5031-05 3/19/05, 12:25 angle property damage only clear NB LT collided with EB thru 0414/10367-05 7/25/05, 10:45 angle property damage only clear WB LT truck sideswiped NB stopped vehicle 0414/742-05 1/7/05, 17:14 angle property damage only clear NB LT collided with EB thru 0414/1599-05 1/21/05, 17:41 angle property damage only clear WB LT collided with EB thru 0414/1775-05 1/28/05, 17:05 rear end property damage only clear WB thru rear end 0414/2768-05 2/10/05, 15:55 angle property damage only snow WB thru collided with EB LT 0414/5192-05 3/22/05, 13:40 rear end property damage only clear EB rear end 0414/7671-05 6/2/05, 12:25 rear end property damage only clear EB rear end 0414/17661-05 12/22/05, 17:05 sideswipe property damage only clear EB rear end just past intersection 0414/428-05 1 /6/05, 17:13 sideswipe property damage only clear WB rear end 0414/6079/05 4/4/05, 16:57 rear end property damage only clear NB rear end 0414/11119-05 8/9/05, 18:23 rear end property damage only clear NB rear end 0414/11841-05 8/26/05, 10:48 rear end property damage only clear NB rear end 0414/15831-06 12/4/06, 11:32 rear end property damage only clear NB rear end 0414/4018-06 03/14/06, 9:52 rear end property damage only clear NB rear end 0414/5915-06 5/1/06, 16:03 rear end property damage only clear NB rear end 0414/7446-06 6/8/06, 13:39 rear end property damage only clear NB rear end 0414/012520-06 9/27/06, 8:57 back-up rear end property damage only clear NB lane - vehicle backed up to allow for WB LT truck and hit car behind. 0414/6090-06 5/5/06, 9:52 rear end property damage only clear EB rear end 0414/10352-06 7/29/06, 16:00 sideswipe property damage only clear WB sideswipe 0414/12221-06 8/16/06, 22:25 sideswipe property damage only clear EB sideswipe 0414/1441-06 1/25/06, 17:55 angle property damage only clear WB thru collided with EB LT 0414/7763-06 6/10/06, 9:24 rear end 1 injured clear WB rear end 0414/17162-06 12128/06, 16:16 angle 2 injured clear NB thru collided with SB LT 0414/1695-06 1/30/06, 17:16 angle 1 injured clear SB thru collided with NB LT 0414/2546-06 2/17/06, 18:59 rear end property damage only clear rear end EB 0414/6599-06 5/18/06, 09:51 rear end property damage only clear rear end WB 0414/7897-06 6/15/06, 15:03 sideswipe property damage only clear WB sideswipe 0414/8205-06 6/19/06, 16:19 angle 3 injured sunny EB thru collided with WB LT 0414/8599-06 7/5/06, 11:06 angle property damage only clear WB LT collided with EB thru South Burlington Vermont Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive. Airport Drive at South Burlington, VT U.S.A. I:P; Burlington International Airport 05403 Traffic Study Williston Road/Kennedy DriveTe1.802.864.0223 StantK Fax.802.864.0165 195310247 3/17/20091 1 www.stantec.com Crash Record Number When (Date/Time) Accident Type Injuries Weather Notes: 0414/13575-06 10/2/06, 21:09 back-up rear end property damage only clear WB car backed into car in queue 0414/15505-06 11/16/06, 9:59 off -road property damage only clear WB LT lost control of car and crashed in SW corner of intersection 0414/15263-06 11/27/06, 18:43 angle 1 injured clear SB thru collided with NB LT 0414/15911-06 11/28/06, 16:39 angle property damage only clear EB thru collided with WB LT 0414/17177-06 12/28/06, 19:15 angle property damage only clear EB thru collided with WB LT 0414/15627-06 11/22/06, 12:10 sideswipe property damage only clear WB side swipe 0414/13769-06 10/27/06, 7:30 angle property damage only clear WB LT collided with EB thru 0414/14875-06 11/9/06, 9:27 off -road property damage only clear EB LT avoids collision and hits curb 0414/10813-07 8/22/07, 13:14 angle property damage only clear NB LT collided with SB thru 0414/16233-07 12/12/07, 17:28 angle property damage only clear NB RT collided with SB LT 0414/10218/07 8/7/07, 21:45 angle property damage only clear WB LT collided with EB thru (construction) 0414/9907-07 7/30/07, 21:28 off -road property damage only clear WB LT collided with median (construction) 0414/10409-07 8/15/07, 11:28 rear end property damage only clear WB rear end 0414/200-07 1/4/07, 16:32 bike / angle 1 injury clear WB LT collided with EB thru bike 0414/697-07 1/17/07, 7:05 angle property damage only icy, snow EB thru collided with WB LT 0414/1886-07 2/2/07, 11:00 rear end 2 injured clear WB rear end 0414/4671-07 3/29/07, 20:08 back up rear end property damage only clear back-up rear end NB 0414/9545-07 7/22/07, 9:26 off road property damage only clear EB off -road motorcycle lost control at construction pavement change 0414/13485-07 10/19/07, 00:22 angle 1 injury clear EB thru collided with NB thru 0414/11672-07 8/24/07, 12:36 sideswipe property damage only clear EB sideswipe 0414/5894-07 4/27/07, 16:46 rear end property damage only clear WB rear end 0414/13047-07 10/12/07, 00:17 broadside property damage only wet / rainy NB thru collided with EB thru (flashing light mode) 0414/17763-07 12/20/07, 16:63 rear end property damage only slippery NB rear end 0414/8115-07 6113/07, 3:45 off -road property damage only clear NB RT tractor trailer hit x-walk utility pole 0414/15914-07 12/8/07, 13:28 rear end 2 injuries clear SB rear end 0414/6898-07 5/26/07, 12:12 off road property damage only clear SB RT collided with x-walk utility pole 0414/8935-07 7/7/07, 14:48 angle property damage only clear SB thru collided with NB LT 0414/3646-07 2/16/07, 10:55 angle property damage only clear WB LT collided with NB parked LT (Tractor trailer LT) 0414/2267-07 2/16/07, 10:58 angle property damage only snow NB LT collided with NB LT (couldn't see painted lines) 0414/8327-07 6/25/07, 10:46 rear end property damage only clear NB rear end 0414/9296-07 7/16/07, 12:24 off -road property damage only clear NB RT tractor trailer hit x-walk utility pole 0414/14253-07 11/7/07, 04:05 broadside property damage only clear WB thru collided with SB thru 0414/9935-07 8/3/07, 20:12 sideswipe property damage only clear WB side swipe 0414/14441-07 11/11/07, 20:41 angle property damage only clear WB RT collided with EB LT 0414/12847-07 10/06/07, 14:47 angle property damage only clear NB thru collided with SB LT South Burlington Vermont Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive. Airport Drive at South Burlington, VT U.S.A. I:P; Burlington International Airport 05403 Traffic Study Williston Road/Kennedy DriveTe1.802.864.0223 stantm Fax.802.864.0165 195310247 3/17/2009 1 www.stantec.com The Vermont Agency of Transportation Traffic Research/Policy & Planning Counter: T12-1011, T12-720 Turning Movement Report File Name : 2-11-2am08 Counted By-. Ward, Miller Site Code : 30414730 Weather: Sunny Start Date : 6/11/2008 Town: 2-11.2 S Burlington Page No : 1 US 2, Kennedy Dr & Airport Dr Groups Printed- Auto - Medium - Hvy _ Airport Drive from Airport US 2 from Williston Kennedy Drive from VT 116 US 2 from 189 Sout- ---- Thru o i h ' - Westbound-------�-- - 1Northbound EastboundLeft --- k - ---- Start Time Left 1 Thru Ri ht ROR Left Thru Ri ht ROR Left Thru Ri ht� ROR Left Thru Ri ht ROR int. Tocai ----- ------ ---- Factor i 1.0 1.0 - _ 1 ;0 1.0 1-0 1.0 1.0 . 1.0 1 0 1 1'0 ' 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ; 1.0 10 - 06,00 AM 16 11 2 0 10 26 16 -4 -- 9 24 20 4 • 6 50 15 5 : 218 06:15 AM 16 10 5 0 13 39 14 2 9 11 7 1 2 65 26 6 226 06:30 AM 17 19 1 0 7 37 16 3 25 18 12 1 7 88 38 6 295 06 45 AM 25 23 1 2 15 56 22 2 25 21 17 17 _ _ _ _ 4 134 _ 75 2 441 _ Tolal 74 63 9 2 45 158 68 11 68 74 56 23 : 19 337 154 19 r 1180 07 00 AM 20 41 1 0 28 69 20 0 29 15 23 81 4 111 56 2 427 07:15 AM 29 39 1 1 46 124 16 1 37 32 28 2 2 114 74 1 547 07:30 AM 19 58 1 1 48 87 21 1 19 32 26 7 3 120 66 5 514 07:45 AM 39 64 2 0 46 116 28 0 42 43 33 9 4 128 81 0 635 Total 107 2D2 5 2 ! 168 - ----- 396 85 2 1, 127 -122 110 26 13 473 277 - 8 2123 08:00 AM 47 54 1 0 44 126 24 3 50 35 55 9 I 6 102 77 15 648 08:15 AM 38 54 2 1 57 111 17 0 45 33 37 4 1 131 63 0 594 08.30 AM 30 53 2 0 55 102 22 0 50 38 36 61 3 126 54 0 ; 577 08:45 AM 25 51 0 53 94 25 0 52. 42 36 14 j 11 124 47 5 584 t 1 2 10 2 4 88 3 _ 197 - 148 164 33 21 483 241 20; 2403 09:00 AM 29 23 5 0 36 93 18 1 52 28 31 3 8 108 40 01 475 09:15 AM 25 27 4 0 41 110 29 1 41 23 20 10 4 84 20 1 ; 440 09:30 AM 18 24 3 2 38 105 30 1 44 27 31 4 13 97 39 3 ': 479 09:45 AM 23 26 2 01 35 115 15 2 43 27 19 2 13 100 24 5 451 Total i 95 100 14 2 , 150 423 92 5 180 105 101 19 • 38 389 123 9 r 1845 10:00 AM i 46 35 4 1 40 92 28 2 44 17 19 4 17 95 34 5 483 10:15 AM 41 32 9 6 36 89 36 2 38 24 19 7 7 106 26 0 478 10:30 AM 34 32 9 3. 40 92 40 4 41 50 25 9 10 124 24 0 537 10_4TotaI 7 30 532 149 134 28 16 160 398 131 10 176 133 gg -28 41 - 427. - 114 _2 7 - 2032 11:00 AM 46 41 5 3 42 126 31 1 55 39 22 9 6 108 30 1 565 11:15 AM 35 34 2 21 36 129 32 1 I 62 37 24 10 7 120 25 1 557 11-30 AM 33 34 1 2 32 114 41 1 i 69 37 26 10 • 8 125 25 2 579 11:45AM 39 21 4 0 34 - - - 137 37 1 I 61 32 25 4 ; 10 136 37 1 ' 579 _ - I _ Total 153 130 12 7 144 - -- 506 141 4 . - 247 -- - 145 - 97 - 33 ----... 31 489 - 117 -- 5 2261 Grand Total 718 B41 78 30; 876 2314 605 35: 989 727 614 162 163 2598 1026 68. 11844 Apprch % 43.1 50.4 4.7 1.8 ', 22.9 60.4 15.8 09 39.7 292 24.6 65 4.2 67.4 26.6 1.8 Total %' 6.1 71 0.7 0.3: 7.4 19.5 5.1 03 8.4 61 5.2 14 14 21.9 87 0.6 Auto 698 802 75 30: 782 2119 556 33 910 687 540 160 660 -2431 973 68 11024 % Auto 97.2 95.4 96.2 100: 89.3 91.6 91.9 94.3 92 94.5 9 98.8 982 93.6 94.8 100 93.1 Medium 19 39 3 0 77 162 45 2 70 _ _____8.7 38 54 2 2 143 45 0 701 % Medium j 2.6 4.6 3 :8 0 8 8 7 7A 5.7 7.1 5. 2 1 2 1.2_ 5.5 4.4 0 5.9 - Heavy 1 1 0 0 0 -- -- 17 -- 33 4 0 -- _ 9 2 _ _8.8 - --- 20 0 1 24 8 6 119 % Heavy I 0.1 0 0 0 19 1 4 07 0 0.9 0.3 3.3 0, 0.6 0.9 08 0 1 The Vermont Agency of Transportation Traffic Research/Policy & Planning Turning Movement Report File Name : 2-11 2am08 Site Code : 30414730 Start Date : 6/11/2008 Page No : 3 Airport Drive from Airport I US 2 from Williston I Kennedy Drive from VT 116 US 2 from 189 Start Time Left Th uOOR 9 t : _ROR AM Tina i Left]. Thru 1 Right ROR A -,, Lefti Thu Northboundnd RROR • AM- Y. Eastbound _ T Left Thru Rf t ROR n Tw i in1 Taal Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM I 39 64 2 0 105 46 116 28 0 1901 42 43 33 9 1271 4 128 81 0 2131 635 08:00 AM I 47 54 1 0 102 44 126 24 3 1971 50 35 55 9 1491 6 102 77 15 2001 648 08:15 AM 38 54 2 1 95 57 111 17 0 185 45 33 37 4 119, 1 131 63 0 195 t 594 08:30 AM-: 30 53 2 0 85 i 55 102 22 0 1799 50 .866 38 36_ 6 130 ' 3 126 54 0 183 577 Tota%A voPHF i 3 9 8.1 1 8 0.3 .921 886 .9 0.6 12.1 .2 .4 9553 1__935 8 .4 -30.7 .7 .3 881 ' - 1.6 - 4.-------- -- 14 48- 275 15 791 2454 _ � App_ Total � 39,8 58,1 _1 8_ 0_3 _ 26.9 60.6 12.1 0.4 35.fi 28.4 30.7_ 5.3 1.8 61.6 34.8 1.9 _ .9 - --- -8-4-9- -- ----- --- - _ 583 .929 .849 .250 .928 .947 Auto 149 215 6 1 371 ; 177 422 85 -9 687 162 138 145 28 4731 13 467 260 15 755 22t36 % Auto, 96.8 956 85.7 100 95.9 187.6 92.7 93A 100 91.5 : 86.6 92.6 90.1 100 90.1 92.9 95.9 94.5 100 95.4 I 93.2 Medium 1 5 10 1 0 16 22 28 6 0 56 21 10 13 0 44 ; 0 17 13 0 30 146 % Medium 1 14.3 0 4A 10.9 6.2 6.6 0 7.5 11 2 67 81 0 84 0 3-5 4.7 0 3.8 . 5.9 Heavy, 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 8 4 1 3 0 8 1 3 2 0 6 22 % Heavy 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 1.1 0 0 1.1 2.1 0.7 1.9 0 1.5 7.1 0.6 07 0 0.81 0.9 J a- -4­ -► 0 Out In Total [-2739I I- 371, 610! i6 16 32 21 0 __ 2 257' 387 644 7 2 1 5 i 149 1 10, 5 0 0 0 8f 225 154 ROR Thru Left 1j '4 Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 07 45 AM Auto Medium Heavy -- -- w Left T_ hru ROR 162 138 173 21 10 13 �- 4 - 1 3, 187 149 189' 67 6�5 89 5 525 124 33 Out In Total -I, ~2 ~-I- - Q N1Iu, IQ W O) V S� i I•I j-_ _ Nv-.-� jty A�QI- The Vermont Agency of Transportation Traffic Research/Policy & Planning Counter: T2096, T1199 Turning Movement Report File Name :2-11 - 2pmO8 Counted By: Madore, Smith Site Code 30414730 Weather: Sunny Start Date 6/11/2008 Town: 2-11.2 S Burlington Page No I US 2, Kennedy Dr & Airport or Groups Printed- Auto - Medium - Heavy Airport Drive from Airport US 2 from Williston i Kennedy Drive from VT 116 US 2 from 189 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound !��ROR� 7-otal Lef!", T6- 'ROR -e-ftT -Th-r-u' Left] Left T _r k-I t T,'- Start Time nr� Riqht Int ___�actor, 1.0 ; 1.0 1.OLD.0 1,OT 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.01' 1'0' I-61-fd IT I'Oj 1.0; 1.0", 1_f.:_00PIMV 46 45 9 4 -61 -"'- 1-49-5 5 54 ---- �_8 O 99' 12:15 PM 54 49 10 5 50 164 50 0 1 88 63 80 0 16 106 42 0 777 12:30 PM 47 43 8 8 57 170 39 0 68 46 41 () ; 9 144 50 2 i 732 12:45 PM 41 48 5 2 -4-2 150 _35..- 0 83 _64 5_4__ _.O 1 14 153 49 41 4 - -Total 168-185 sf 19 1 210 633 179 0 321 227 233 0. 46 502 193 71 2975 01-:_00 PM 37 29 5 3 52 157 33 0 86 51 73 0 8 123 58 41 719 01:15 PM• 0 35 40 6 4 63 156 29 0, 71 52 51 4 128 35 1 675 01:30 PM 27 37 5 4 28 127 42 0 80 50 79 0 7 137 42 1 666 01:45 PM 35 30 3 4 85 135 25 0 61 52 64 2 128 33 3 660 - - - fo-t al 134 136 -1 5 22-8 575 129 0 298 205 267 01 _2T_ 6 168 9 2720 02:00 PM 37 38 10 1 46 161 31 0 65 46 56 0 14 108 30 1 1 644 02:15 PM 48 29 5 6 44 125 38 0 64 44 65 0 8 123 42 3 644 02:30 PM 34 32 9 4 0 53 163 40 55 67 76 0 22 116 20 81 699 02:45 PM: 41 43 5 61 115 29 0 63 50 57 101 23 - 14� ------ 29 16 204 564 138 -0 __Z54_ 'd, 66 448 115 16 _;2595 03:00 PM, 24 32 3 4 51 118 41 0 69 55 63 0' 10 82 20 2 576 03.15 PM 1 40 31 8 6 43 121 53 0 76 61 66 0 22 103 14 1 645 03:30 PM 42 38 4 3 56 194 53 0 121 85 83 2 20 114 38 1 854 03:45 PM 35 45 8 3 59 177 59 0 7277 71 0 14 153 27 1 801 Total 141 146 23 16 209 610 208_ 6- 338 178� 66 57_2676 04:00 PM 1 61 50 8 5. 56 160 31 0 1 97 58 70 1 17 97 15 727 0415 PM I 59 52 8 6 62 154 32 0 107 83 75 0 11 106 23 0 778 04:30 PM 48 37 7 2 72 197 57 0 94 78 87 1 12 122 32 2 848 04:45 PM 53 18 2 ' 55 208 50 0 95 98 _58 0 126 20 0 848 1151 245______FI_9_ 1'76 01 _�_93 - -___ _ ��O _.. __ __,_ Total 221 184 41 3�'� 260 i 60 451---- !�O_ 3 --- 32-01- 05-00 PM 36 43 9 1 71 206 62 0 142 114 71 0 18 82 17 0 872 05:15 PM j 39 55 9 4 68 166 44 0 131 90 56 0 I 8 116 31 0 817 05:30 PM 44 40 9 4 54 176 31 0 80 54 59 1 3 120 43 4 722 05:45 PM 46 39 10 2 56 134 24 0 93 49 71 0 7 96 33 3 663 fo-ta 16-5- - - 177 3-7-11 24 - 9 - __. 6 - 82 161 0 446 307 _ 257 1 36 41 - 4 1 - 24 --- 7 --- 3074 Grand Total 1009 970 181 92 1345 3783 985 0 2043 1541 1584 5 284 2783 789 47 17441 Appreh %. 44,11 41,1 8 41 22 61 9 16,1 0 11,5 29,11 30-6 01 7,3 71"3 20,2 1 2 Tota I % 5.8 5.6 1 0.5 7,7 21.7 5.6 0 11.7 8.8 9.1 0 1.6 16 45 03 Auto 980 928 177 89 1255 3664 949 0 1995 1482 14-6-1-5 281 2663 749 47 16725 % Aut - o 97.1 95.7 _ 97.8--- 96.7 933 96.9 96.3 0 97.7 96,2 92.2 100 98.9 95.7 94.9 100 95.9 Medium 26 39 3 3 64 '66 36----- o- -'33- 53__103 0 - 67 -32 - _O� - _571 % Medium 2.6 4 111 3 3 4.8 2.5 3 0 1.6 34 6.5 0 0.7 3.1 4.1 0 3.3 Heavy-1 3 3 1 0 26 23 6 0 15 6 --TO- ___O ___1_33_____8 0 145 % Heavy: 0.3 0.3 06 01 19 06 0.6 0 0.7 OA 1.3 0 0.4 1-2 1 0' 0.8 The Vermont Agency of Transportation Traffic Research/Policy & Planning Turning Movement Report File Name : 2-11_2pm08 Site Code : 30414730 Start Date : 6/11 /2008 Page No : 3 _Start Time Left , - - - -- from - - - - - -- 1 or -- I rport Drive from Airport US 2 from Williston Kennedy Drive from VT 116 � US 2 from 189 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound . - --- - - ---- - -- - - - - --- - -- - --- - - i- - - - 1 Thru : Right ; RC R I nvo ro:>a Left-Thru Rf�ht ROR nop_rma Left i Thru Right • ROR nao r«r Lefl ThfU Ri ht i ROR nnn raa �ni Tomi Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 05 45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 '-'- -- ..-• - ------ - -�- --- -- - Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM; 48 37 7 2 94 j 72 197 57 0 326 ; 94 78 87 1 2601 12 122 32 2 1681 848 04:45 PM 53 45 18 2 118 ; 55 208 50 0 313 : 95 98 58 0 251 1 20 126 20 0 1661 848 05:00 PM 36 43 9 1 89 71 206 62 0 3391 142 114 71 0 327 18 82 17 0 1171 872 _ _ 05:15 PM , 39 55 9 _ _ 4 107 68 166 44 0 278 1 131 90 56 0 277 8 116 31 0__ 1551 817 TotalVolumeT176 180 43 9 408 266 777 213 0 1256 462 380 272 1 1115 58 446 100 2 606 3385 %APpTotal ' 43.1 44.1 10.5 2.2 _ 21.2 61.9 17 0 41.4 34.1 24.40.1 9.6 73-6 16.5 0.3 PHF.830 .818 .597 .563 .864 .924 .934 .859 .000 .926 .813 .833 .782 .250 .852 .725 .885 .781 .250.902 970 Auto_173 175 42 9 - 399 260 768 213 0 1241 457 373 262 1 1093 57 436 96 2 591 3324 % Auto 98.3 97.2 97.7 100 97.8 97.7 98.8 98.9 98.2 96.3 100 9801 98.3 97.8 960 100 97.5 98.2 Medium 3 5 1 0 9 2 7 0 0 9 5 6 8 0 19 1 5 4 0 10 47 % Medium Heavy 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 6 0 1 2 0 3 0 5 0 0 5 14 % Heavy 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 0.3 0 0 0.5 0 0.3 0.7 0 0.3 0 1.1 0 0 0.81 0.4 Airport txwe tram Airport Out In Total 643' i 3991 1042 7', 9i 16 _631 408' 1659. 5 T 175` 173 1! 5 3 0' 0 0' _ 52 j- 180 ; -- .176 ROR Thru Left Peak Hour Data y0 fN0 N ^''M -• North ° o niol o Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM i Auto Z) (D V N m v o'{lO Medium _Heavy -- -- - - Left Thru ROR 457 373' 26 8 5 0 6 1 8 2, 462. 380 7373 _ _1 - 1093I 16261 F51��Y 19; 30I4 3 748; I.1663J 1115 Out In Total I<annarly t)-fr„m VT 11R - 0 0 IN � -IrD N�I Williston Road Williston Road Kennedy Drive Airport Drive Eastbound Left Thru Right Westbound Left Thru Right Northbound Left Thru Right Southbound Right Thru Left Lane Use �► * µ f I � � I y Overall LOS 2009 Volume (vph) 15 528 315 219 493 103 203 163 205 9 245 168 No Build HCM LOS C C C C D D D D D C AM* Delay (sec) 22 33 31 22 36 40 36 36 51 31 C Cycle Length 106 sec VIC 95% Queue (ft.) 0.05 0.71 0.77 0.42 0.67 0.52 0.14 0.01 0.76 0.47 2009 Volume (vph) 63 484 111 289 841 232 501 414 296 57 197 193 No Build HCM LOS C C C D F F D D D E PM • Delay (sec) 26 32 35 39 220 133 40 36 41 56 E Cycle Length 116 sec v/C 95% Queue (ft.) 0.37 0.52 0.81 0.85 1.37 1.13 0.45 0.03 0.51 0.84 2011 Volume (vph) 64 489 112 292 850 234 506 417 299 57 197 193 No Build HCM LOS C C D D F F D D D E DHV Delay (soc) 26 32 36 39 231 139 41 1 36 41 57 E Cycle Length 117 v/C 0.38 0.52 0.82 0.85 1.39 1.15 0.46 0.03 0.51 0.85 sec 95% Queue (ft.) 2011 Volume (vph) 65 489 112 292 850 237 506 423 299 59 204 199 Build HCM LOS C C D D F F D D D E DHV Delay (sec) 26 32 36 39 242 146 41 36 42 62 E Cycle Length 117 v/C 0.38 0.52 0.82 0.85 1.42 1.17 0.47 0.04 0.53 0.87 sec 95% Queue (ft.) 2016 Volume (vph) 66 502 1151 299 873 240 519 428 307 58 202 198 No Build HCM LOS C C D D F F D D D E DHV Delay (sec) 26 32 39 39 265 157 42 37 43 64 F Cycle Length 118 v/c 0.40 0.52 0.85 0.86 1.47 1.19 0.49 0.03 0.53 0.88 sec 95% Queue (ft.) 2016 Volume (vph) 69 502 115 299 873 249 519 444 307 64 222 217 Build HCM LOS C C D D F F D D D F DHV Delay (sec) 27 32 39 40 298 176 43 37 44 85 F Cycle Length 118 Vic ]_0.42 0.52 0.84 0.86 1.54 1.24 0.51 0.04 0.59 0.97 sec 95% Queue (ft.) AM volume adjusted to DHV per AM/ PM ratio. 2009 PM adjusted to DHV. South Burlington Vermont Stantec Consulting Services, Inc 55 Green Mountain DriveSynchro Analysis Results Summary t::P South Burlington, VT U S A Burlington Airport Williston Road (Route 2) at Airport 54032009 Traffic Study Drive and Kennedy DriveTel 802-864-0223 Fax 802-85 195310247 6/8/2009 Stantec www.stantec.ntec.com Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 3/30/2009 Lane Configurations 1 0 1 0 1 t t :205 ::, ':f68;;,'_:' ;245;' 9 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane (7+Yid yA"- 0t2 -:' . _ �;: 1.1 [2 ' 1.Q " . .:_ t(T Grade (%) -1% 2% 1 % -1 % afal Los lime, s ,b 0 - 6.0 6'.0 6,0 SAjA. Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i .f70... 0 <.. Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0,95 1.00 1.00 5• ;�( F-..:.t'Y=,:er„„'3332 17 Flt Permitted 0.43 1.00 0.15 - 1.00 0.35 1.00 1.00 0.59 1.00 1.00 940 ON ve 7 5 :16 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .I t o - - 1 � :5 f, � "219m.:•> 5. ``�� a I)r 2- .3:,; g, '1' 205�:,:�`i w,2�:`':: � RTOR Reductio 0 69 0 0 12 0 0 0 166 0 0 7 ;...,Ea ou`':f•ti �5 "- ,Z74'''':. 21'� -, 5 ''203„ 83'` i i3' 2 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 +`; �....t, T' ►tt. t` :::a-..,.:. _,.•: ,_ .. . ....::.......," ..: .,, .- ,. -. .,-,-..... pe Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 rm tt" e e'. d s� ` .V t iG•„ i : - Actuated Green, G (s) 38.2 35.4 53.2 44.4 32.1 20.1 _ 20.1 3.0.7 19.4 1 9.4 feen = �,:,, „ :,-;. _ ..` •:=;, V .:::�'�>::. •_'.. t, ��•` - Actuated :_,_ g/C Ratio 0.36 .;, 0.33 0.50 0.42 1 ",.. 0.30 , 0.19 , - 0.19 0.29! 0.18 0.18 4a'yyi� T Q Q:8'y1 •Y .�H Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 &0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 284 1394..,,., . :3D2:-_ `,,:31, 27$='= . , 30 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.24 c0.09 0.18 c0.08 0.10 0.05 c0.14 � = � '. v/c Ratio 0.05 0.71 0.77 6 0.01 A.iL r> :)Y: ,r 21:9i,,' 30 1:9;2,; 2 ,$.;.:' 2 9 3 �,` 3 .6';,:`'=::35. . shy ti' n :`:";3 :5 Progression Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 �. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nGreieilt?_Vg ?l 5.8' 1': ::1;'"..-ru:;t Delay (s) 22.0 33,0 31.4 22,0 35.6 40.1 36.0 30.9 50.9 35.5 l'�'tw..-::it:� .i..,;=,, �,;#�`:;<� ~}u� c, j" Ap roach Delay (s) 32.8 24.5 :; �:ni` i,..:,, '�:1RLS:L''!r:;:'rta.•y%''�-t-''L- 37.0 42.6 AP�CA�C,t�"L.'�a.:' . , , , - ... .`{�','` ,G�.''-,`'•i' rFf�- .. , - - . _ :_, M l ot v 0 ,. 'rY Or e'(✓fo;<" +,a 32.7 HQ,.0vel'of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 NO d 1,Q""f's '(s �.��.,1,? SUS d�(lgstEt ale �S� t , ��, _' � _E;:_� n. Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.0% 1 ICU Level of Service D A ININS" s-Polffll lydlbi 1 c Critical Lane Group 2009 Design Hour Volumes HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Morning Peak Hour Page 1 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 3/31/2009 ­1 -* --t f- .4- 4-- '\ t /0� �► 41 Configurations Lane ,._ - Y cL a (vph):, ._.._ _ ..: . � ........_..,�;:.,.. 63 '::; 484 •_ ;;:. , t �: ; ; : 2 9 r ; ' 41; `'s 232 --- - -- 50„ ::•:, -.: k14_... _ ::•._, i 93 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 I Lane Odth 10:. _ ::.;_;: t C i s -; = 12 Grade (%) -1 2% 1% ° Totaf.LoS.ttrne s .._,_..._,....,..,., :-: .0 _._ . 6.0.._......._..............:::6.©:.:::.:::.•:.(7,Q„.. .._..... •:60�� �.�a $, ... �, ..: _:�_; .::,. ,.....',•�.::,,-.''�� <.:<• �:• :.:...::-•.._.. ,.:�::.::......_ Lane�Util. Factor 1.0 0.95 1 00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 FA,0` 1� Q's97 1.00f)7 1.60 ttl0==`K085 Fit Protected 0.95 1. 00 95 1.00 95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 .. , . S�f �•.:....,.,;(p.,.).., .::-:�.:._.. .....,,; • -. 3375 1f�1:':;':_ 33:fd. ;;�::,:-::.:�_-;:,_;:::164 Fit Permitted 0.11 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.51 1.0 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.0 267 765 ` ' s._. 11. Peak-hourfactor,factor,iPHF 1.0031.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.' 1.00 1..00 1.00 1 Go TOO 0 1 01 Ai�j. Flow (vph;3::. 484, 111': 289' 84;1 232 5Q1 414---,- - 17 57 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 • . 15 0 0 19 0 0 0 150 0 0 45 Lawsfou Ftow `==-'_i;'ii= s ..,,. •p • (..P.:.l:::.:.::._:_. ` 1 ::.',>.,.•,......- _.,.. :_:. 414,:' t45 -" 193 197 i'2 .. Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % Turn. Type prp.+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt Rin Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Pe�m1{}ett1F_..:p:.� 2 6'M' y'_ 8 ,i-:. s $ 4-�}:�_;; 4 Actuated Green, (s 45.8 38.6 56.0 43.7 37.8 25.5 25.5 37.8 25.5 25.5 .. eC re '"~' .::..:::.:.::.... 45.8 =1;8'. 6 - 56.4 _i° i43.7 3i'. "_` ,5 245 3 .1 - ) ?5 25.5 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.39�:33::-- 0.48 0.38 0.:.. 0.22 0.33 0.22 0.22 1 . -- •.:': Cl�arahce %'e (s) � 6.9 �;-_:::6:ElY�,. _ _ _ ,::•�-_�..:.:0.33...__ .0.22 ,::...::�..._.::. _.. ..,....._..._..__.-..._.•_... �°:D•�_ ,D> . . . :............ �- �,0;=.-�. -,:::& _ . _.6a#�,�..� ,.9 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (ypj) 170 1 t20 355 1244 366 366 322 229 387 364 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.17 c0.09 c0.32 c0.14 0.25 0.09 0.11 - 2 a •3 ` ..,_. v/c Ratio ... .. 0.37 0.52 0.81 0.85 1.37 1.13 0.45 0.84 0.51 0.03 UitiimDe' 21;:,i.: 33.2 _ 3�'__�=`,�5.4=��r'394� �``�32.3`'���399�:�'':3ra..7 Progression Factor 5 1.00 1,00 1.00 1, .00 1 1.0 1.00 1.00 _..- InClerpental fay, d2W;; 1.4': -;..:::.::..:. .... : •,_ :'::. 0�4.':,::: as ; ` ::°• : ? ,.3 5.5 ::, ::_: ::: - ...00 1,82.6, ;= _,_,,�7.6::::=:;.'_;:.'i fl; ; :33. Delay (s) 26.0 31.7 34.5 38.8 220 4 133.0 40.4 55.8 41.0 35.8 Li q I of se�yroe.: C _ G. :.::..::: ::.:::: . .:C D •` _:..:: ::;..: F ..- F.7 ..::-._.. 4 1 Approach Delay (s) 31.2 37.9 146.5 46.7 Apprp�pf�.:tOS t:=-.:�:�°.::.:::;..::�......-.,.-.: ..:::_..:.:;::_::-....:.:_..:•:w..::';::.:--:.�- ::..... -. ' - • . •t: �Y''•• e.2:i :• HCM Average Control Del..___ ay 73.5 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.06 Actii�id ':':�,.:...40 Ie:Cn t s 1 t6.3 :::!:-:::.::,''i7in; dfICist lime(s!"':.' :.:_;:.; ::..;.> = Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.4% ICU Level of Service F - c Critical Lane Group 2009 Design Hour Volumes HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 1 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 3/31/2009 Lane Configurations' Q1nae v h� ( .-.' p::' ,. • 64 ; 89 29t3 :197.,, 57 .: :, . Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 .: 1900 .. 1900 1900 1900 12 Grade (%) -1% 2% 1% 1% Fofal LosC ('Y `. - fi.i) ir0 .. Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1::09,. Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 5.. 3310.- s- 'zi ,. F_1:.,-.68:rn47i) - 19�":'. t76,, 6iif At Permitted 0.11 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00 Safd;Flo�pe.,,..::`:=, �:,I ; . , •(95: _ .3.3..: ,;` ..: � :.;Q78 �u � ? 1 ;_ > fi2� ' i; -.; �;�0 � • ;2fiT '`1,-7�5-� ; .1�'6'1 : , Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 A 4rs:a? r . 92 50 ; 23:; :5 - _ ,'':4y7;-:..: `259` a''93s;: _ • 1.57 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 0 0 18 0 0 0 151 Ott 0 45 H ne GtOuloW'r `- g6 _ _ p'. E • -,. 6 4'7 ` a e Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 /° 1 /° 1 /° 1 /° 1 /° 1 /° 2 /° 2 /° 2 /° 1 /° 1 /° 1 Q m - } f' a t=; '•, �', errri Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 .e mitts 2r '.. ... ...... ... Actuated Green, G (s ) 46.4 39. 1 56.4 44.1 87.8 25.5- 25.5 37.8 25.5 25.5 _ _�.,.., M� �pqhi 4_ 4 IMP ;} - - - Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.33 0.48 0.38 0.32 0.22 0.22 0.32 0.22 0." Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 t70',. 1_ 3p� . 354._3 21 .,: :22$ • .' 38 363 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.17 c0.09 c0.32 c0.15 0.25 0.09 0.11 _�' - .'t 'a"aun'' i v/c Ratio 0.38 0.52 0.82 0.85 1.39 1.15 0.46 KI 0.85 0.51 0.03 150 45.6 . `3;7, Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fncree"_�4', "`. -�,.4• O.d_° f4^4.,.. o y Delay (s) 26.0 31.7 35.8 39.2 231.4 138,6 40.7 56.6 41.3 36.0 LeveEf Sep C C .:. - ' `' .- . '' : Q Ap roach Delay (s) 31.1 38.5 153.1 47.2 SP HCM;ieiageCarit¢I;Deiay 760z - HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.07 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.0% c Critical Lane Group 6f Service'- SUij'Ipstiel):;; ICU Level of Service F 2011 No Build Volumes HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 1 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 3/31/2009 Lane Configurations +T* Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 N N Grade (0/6) 2% 1% q.; r Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 pp\. _T, 0� Vlp� 4 ire ON Fit Protected 0.95 11.00 0.95 11.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 11.00 "I �3316, ,_ t �,16v d - _ M oo! J 6 Fit Permitted 0.11 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.49 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 M NO h i �2 4 20�_1 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 15 0 0 19 0 0 0 149 0 0 46 _05'' - 29 ­,� I 4 4!: , 42 Heavy Vehicles r/6) 1 % I % 1 % � 1 % INA" .- 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 1 %_ 1 % I % P , - - - _! , 1. P M" fri" P. P _2% fit:t "PR �P -,.erm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 46.7 39.4 56.7 44.4 37.8 25.5 25.5 37.8 25.5 25.5 ISO " k ,, 10."& 0", i5 -, ­`:i, 4, Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.34 0.48 0.38 0.32 0.22 0.22 0.32 0.22 • 0.22 D 6, 6 A Vehicle Extensions .0 3.0 3.0 _ 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 _32 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.17 cO.09 cO.32 cO.15 0.25 0.09 0.12 3rl v/c Ratio 0.38 0.52 0.82 0.85 1.42 1.17 0.47 0.87 0.53 0.04 2 Zi j, -'l �J� .3- Z1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2 3E ­-, 31- A I - -.-- t, ' Delay (s) 26.0 31.6 35.5 39.1 241.8 146.1 41.0 61.5 41.9 36.1 y A proach Delay (s) 31.0 38.3 159.9 49.6 f tz"' HPIO, Ley6t of Service. HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.08 E e, -j sl .4g; -, 11,17.1,"o" url_n P, ffiq - Intersection Capacity Utilization 96,5% ICU Level of Service F c Critical Lane Group 2011 DHV Volumes HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 1 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 3130/2009 ' Lane Configurations I t'4 I t I t � /otUr a (yi::Vh •:- _ P -� F ::502 =_ t 3.15 : 9� :>;8�3,::.• . 24b , ;T8'::` ''428"::;__ 307: `_%1:98_ =;•'20 ':'. 5$ Ideaall Flow pl) w (vph i904 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900~ 1900 1900 1900 1900 ? f • ?t;. `12 9';.: ---1% :: '; , .. '9. flT 1.3 2% -1% }Grade fi Lane til. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 F. :::..;•, .,: 1.b 0:97 ,.�. � :0`p: 7 , _...._ ..., .,.. " .,. Q==- �:$5 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0,95 1.00 1.00 ■/ sais'Ia{[j.�; {� (7{ry[ -.. ;• 1•6. 6 ;;,33'�1' �-.is-:t.y, •-- - - s•::'� „1...,.'� _ �>ar,- Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.49 1.00 1.00„� 0.16 1.00 1,00 Satt7(ti;>2 '. ::. -33 33`': 4 _ 675' 1 - _ Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 v� aal_ ft, �� :5:: °299::. •'873 �2 Q•.'= 5'19 - . '`��BI° RTOR Reduction v h 0 15 0 0 18 0 0 0 151 0 0 46 Lane G(op;='F __.. �° 519•'.1 Iles /° Heavy Vehicles � I 1 /° ° ° 1°/ 1 % ° 1 /° 1 /° ° 2 /° % 2. 2% 1% 1% 1% U . ,=.-1%- P •:':,. :m m e' :Perm t Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8` 7 4N t'. t •:: :.:::_' .,=„-. � -- 6; -i,. .:. , ,., Actuated Green, G (s) 47.9 40.6 57.9 45.6 ,.:- 37 8 25.5,:. 25.5 M 37.8 25.5 25.5 ,. ' BGt CBet�• ., . ,•.,,,.,,,..�7.9 '..,4.�15 .. - 9-� .�4� 7- :,' � - :.,la,, .,�.3., Actuated g/C Ratio 0. - T 40 0.34 0.49 ' . . ... ..... 0.39 .....$�' 0,32 _ .... 0.22 _.fir....__. 0.22 0.32 -- 0,22 0.22 tearancA.Vehicle \ . ,. Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0" 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 fifi'.` 15/• 353 '. „y'275 53 ''• 359 ';.,-`'=.317•': = 25_.:_ .:, 3 r, v/s Ratio Prot - 0.02 0.18 c0.09 c0.33 c0.15 0.26 0.09 0.11 ��,....,�.::' :, : '... • � ►��s, i�aii�o;. R� '� �; � : , �;33... c4�� =- ,,tt��� ::: ::; �'•0 y!�:` = = . � .' �. .. v/c Ratio ... _ ... . 0.40 0.52 , 0.85 0.86 1.47 1.19 . 0.49 0.88 0.53 0,03 4 Progression g 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -,_, , , .[,,:,• ``- l?_. .l1.00 4 _ �.._ -��• E -- ;6. ,226.:5,- 1ii't1'3• •.`; :; �2:�`.:` M Delay (s) 26.3 31.5 38.8 39.4:,:. 265.3 .,....... .2 .. , ., . 42.6 36.8 OM", • -: C � � Approach s pp Delay 39.3 173.7 51.0 5 , ppraact'L+S„ ❑ - ; : - i t• 4�- � 'Level ervice HCM Volume to Ca ac ratio Capacity Artua d GY'cle%gth �s SST ,) 1 f.4 Sufi ^ Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.8% ICU Level of Service F IrSis'PL?:ft1)' 15 c Critical Lane Group 2016 No Build Volumes HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page i Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 3/30/2009 Lane Configurations r 24 4: 30 2 _6 [deal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 NO "I At", : 12 1 6 Grade 2% - 1% � n -g 0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 if 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 d 7. 7, Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1,00 -3:367 - MWO _Q -1-7 Y, - It A, Fit Permitted 0.10 1.00 1.-60 0.45 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 _467 .1.00 4 761 j Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ad-00, J,5, 22 RTOR Reduction (vph). 0 15 0 0 19 0 0 0 146 0 0 49 Wn JR R 37, --ip Heavy Vehicles 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 20/0 1% 1% 1% T T "M t P p_ R, +P111, Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 n Actuated Green, G (s) 48.5 41.1 58.3 46,10 37.8 25.5 25.5 37.8 25.5 25.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.35 0.49 0.39 0.32 021 0.21 0.32 0.21 0.21 6 bA Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 - 3.0 W .3 -4 M, -3 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.18 c0.09 c0.33 c0.16 0,27 0.10 0.13 ROOM— f `001 RANF-to v/c Ratio 0,42 0.52 _41 0.84 0.86 1.54 1.24 NiORM 0.51 0.97 0.59 0.04 D3, IMIRJ'�Ar MIV "7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ".2 M 5p, ,-z. 0 Delay (s) 26.5 31.4 38.5 39.8 298.4 176.4 42.6 85,2 44.3 37.1 Approach Delay (s) 30.9 39.5 193.9 61. 1 0 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio O'CY ih (8yi Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 11. '3 '9 - 1.13 4- 99.2% sb��M of (q­ :­St,M Ji­ "Ai@ji, 24, WN " ' __ I ICU Level of Service F 2016 Design Hour Volumes HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 1 3 -.4 r/ lycq.�eOUCCIVL F-Osf4 10 ; 00 Pm dNTrL (; AVI" % 90. 8 Airport Drive at Airport Road South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Study File Name : Airport Drive at Airport Road -AM Site Code 11192008 Start Date ; 11/19/2008 Page No = 1 _ Airport Drive From North Airport Hangar Parking Lot From East Airport Drive From South Airport Road From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Apia' Right Thru Left Peds App*Total Right TI Left Pedsl Apr) Total Right Thru Left Peds App- Total Int. Total _ Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 i.ol 1.01 J.oj 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 1 1.01 1 0 1.0 06:30 AM 06.45 AM 5 10 38 0 42 0 0 0 43 52 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 30 0 32 0 0 0 31 34 1 2 0 6 0 11 0 0 7 13 82 100 Total 15 80 0 0 95 2 0 0 0 2 3 62 0 0 65 3 0 17 0 20 182 07.00 AM 07:15 AM 07.30 AM _ 07.45 AM 3 4 2 7 43 64 93 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 68 95 117 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 16 310 0 0 326 0 0 0 0 08'00 AM 6 109 2 0 117 3 0 1 0 08:15 AM 5 81 2 0 88 2 0 0 0 08.30 AM 5 85 1 0 91 1 0 0 0 08:45 AM 7 74 1 0 82 0 0 2 0 Total 23 349 6 0 378 6 0 3 0 09 00 AM 3 49 1 0 53 1 0 4 0 09:15 AM 7 52 0 0 59 1 0 2 0 Grand Total 64 840 7 0 911 10 0 9 0 Apprch % 7.0 92.2 0.8 00 52.6 0.0 47.4 0.0 Total % 3.7 490 0.4 0.0 53.1 0.6 0.0 0.5 0.0 0 0 23 2 0 25 9 0 3 0 12 83 0 2 35 5 0 42 2 0 5 0 7 117 0 0 67 2 0 69 12 0 6 0 18 182 0 2 64 6 0 72 11 1 5 0 17 206 0 4 189 15 0 208 34 1 19 0 54 588 4 2 72 7 0 81 7 0 8 0 15 217 2 0 39 1 0 40 3 0 4 0 7 137 1 1 66 5 0 72 9 0 7 0 16 180 2 3 50 3 0 56 5 0 5 0 10 150 9 6 227 16 0 249 24 0 24 0 48 684 5 5 51 2 0 58 4 1 7 0 12 128 3 1 55 0 0 56 7 0 8 0 15 133 19 19 584 33 0 636 72 2 75 0 149 1715 3.0 91.8 5.2 0.0 48.3 1.3 50.3 0.0 1.1 1.1 34.1 19 0.0 37.1 4.2 0.1 4.4 0.0 8.7 Airport Drive Airport Hangar Parking Lot Airport Drive Airport Road From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Int. Total Total Total Total Total Peak Hour Prom UU:JU AM to U9:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:30 AM Volume 20 393 4 0 417 5 0 1 0 6 4 242 16 0 262 33 1 23 0 57 742 Percent 4.8 94.2 1.0 0.0 83.3 0.0 16.7 0.0 1.5 92.4 6.1 0.0 57.9 1.8 40.4 0.0 08:00 Volume 6 109 2 0 117 3 0 1 0 4 2 72 7 0 81 7 0 8 0 15 217 Peak Factor 0.855 High Int 07:45 AM 08:00 AM 08:00 AM 07:30 AM Volume 7 110 0 0 117 3 0 1 0 4 2 72 7 0 81 12 0 6 0 18 Peak Factor 0.891 0.375 0.809 0.792 Field Observations by: Amanda Hanaway-Corrente on: 3/19/2008, 4:30 - 5:30pm 1. Confirmed all approaches allow Right Turn on Red. 2. Approach Grades: Eastbound: Aprox. -1 % Westbound: Aprox.2% jJ Northbound: Aprox.1% Southbound: Aprox -1 % 3. Signal Timing: Total Split Times (Green +Yellow +Red) Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 Cycle 4 Cycle 5 Cycle 6 Cycle 7 Cycle 8 Cycle 9 Cycle 10 L Min Green: Max Green: Total Split: 12 12 13 14 15 14 16 0 17 16 Avg. Total Split: Min Green: '�•j� Max Green: Total Split: 4— 18 19 34 28 25 27 10 30 32 13 Avg. Total Split: Min Green: I Max Green: I PED Total Split: 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 Avg. Total Split: Min Green:! it Max Green: Total Split: j 23 10 12 17 13 14 16 17 17 16 Avg. Total Split:= i Min Green:,, t Max Green: � 11 Total Split:3 20 30 20 44 30 44 19 32 28 22 Avg. Total Split: �14t)tiCft:BCY�t[l s»"•;:'3 -' .::,r''':71 .. 7,�;i 1G,,.., „'83 1.11 fji':,' ":7 7ii;, »:"„.:':,"•;;.'.,;, ;,s, Notes: 1 The intersection is fully actuated 2. The Ped phase is rarely activated. 3. NB and SB Left Turn Phase generally only uses the min green 4. NB and SB Thru Phase only uses max green time sometimes. 5 The EB and WB Left Turn Phase uses the max green time often, but the EB Left Turn Protected Phase is not always used. 6. The EB and WB Thru Phase never uses the max green time. South Burlington Vermont Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT U.S.A Burlington International Airport Signal Timing and Other Observations 05403 Traffic Study -- --- Tel 802.864.0223 Stantec Fax. 802.864 0165 195310247 3/19/20091 www.stantec.com N- L.1 0 CL w 2 N 16' 16' 0 AIRPORT ROAD 07 GENERAL AVIATION TERMINAL DRIVE rn 0 0 Ln — -i 0% w cr BUS STOP Q 0 16' 16, � a 0 NOT TO SCALE South 6urhngtw v.rmom EXISTING CONDITION: INTERSECTION #2 SI1tEC Suainglanlnbm—.l&rpw TrAc Sway INTERSECTION OF AIRPORT ROAD/ Slanlea Ca�eulang S Inc 11-1 11 AIRPORT DRIVE :, �f11 p1On Vi US a„a 1953102 7 3110I2009 CRASH RATE WORKSHEET CITY/TOWN . South Burlington COUNT DATE 11/20/2008 UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED: —.INTERSECTION.. DATA — MAJOR STREET. Airport Drive MINOR STREET(S) - AirportRoad COLLISION DIAGRAM (Label Approaches) Airport Drive Southbound North 12 I m D 0 O � 0 cr n 4 M u1 o q 3- 7 } 3 1 ' d v ' CD Airport Drive Northbound Peak Hour Volumes APPROACH: 1 2 3 4 5 Total Crash Record Number When (Date/Time) Accident Type Injuries Weather Notes: 0414/8835-05 6/28/05, 6:13 angle property damage only clear SB LT collided with NB 0414/17463-05 12/20/05, 17:16 angle property damage only snow NB LT collided with SB 0414/16820-07 12/14/07, 18:25 broadside property damage only slippery NB thru collided with WB thru 0414/2806-07 2/16/07, 10:48 angle property damage only slippery NB thru collided with EB LT South Burlington Vermont Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive. f Airport Drive at `/ South Burlington, VT U.S.A. Burlington International Airport Traffic Study Airport Road 05403 Tel. 802.864.0223 Stamm Fax.802.864.0165 195310247 3/17/20091 www.stantec.com Airport Drive at Airport Road South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Study File Name : Airport Drive at Airport Road -AM Site Code : 11192008 Start Date _ 11/19/2008 Page No : 1 r4munc Printarl- hR;;vv VAhInIAC _ Airport Drive From North Airport Hangar Parking Lot From East Airport Drive From South Airport Road From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Factor _ 1.0 101 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 06:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 06:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 _ Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 5 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 07:30 AM 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Total 0 6 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 08:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 08:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 08:30 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 08_:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ Total 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 09:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 09:15 AM 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 17 0 0 17 0 1 0 0 Apprch % 00 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 37.8 0.0 0.0 37.8 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 7 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 16 0 0 16 0 11 0 0 11 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 35.6 0.0 0.0 35.6 0.0 24.4 0.0 0.0 244 3 3 9 2 17 3 1 5 4 13 4 6 45 Airport Drive Airport Hangar Parking Lot Airport Drive Airport Road From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds 'Pp' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Int. Total Total Total Total Total Peak Hour From 06:30 AM to 09:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 06.45 AM Volume 0 4 0 0 4 Percent 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 07.30 Volume 0 4 0 0 4 Peak Factor High Int. 07:30 AM Volume 0 4 0 0 4 Peak Factor 0.250 0 1 0 0 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0.250 0 11 0 0 11 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0 4 0 0 4 06:45 AM 0 4 0 0 4 0.688 0 3 0 0 3 19 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 1 9 0.528 07:00 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 375 Airport Drive at Airport Road South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Study File Name : Airport Drive at Airport Road -AM Site Code : 11192008 Start Date : 11/19/2008 Page No ° 1 r:rni inc PrinfaA. ai ifnc - hamiv vahiNnc Airport Drive Airport Hangar Parking Lot Airport Drive Airport Road From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left I Peds App- Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Int. _ Total 1 Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1 0 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 06:30 AM 5 38 0 0 43 1 0 0 0 1 1 30 0 0 31 1 1 6 0 8 83 _ 06:45 AM 10 42 0 0 52 1 0 0 0 1 2 36 0 0 38 2 0 11 0 13 104 Total 15 80 0 0 951 2 0 0 0 2 3 66 0 0 69 3 1 17 0 21 187 07.00 AM 3 43 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 2 0 26 9 2 3 0 14 86 07:15 AM 4 64 0 0 68 0 1 0 0 1 2 37 5 0 44 2 0 5 0 7 120 07:30 AM 2 97 0 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 2 0 73 12 1 6 0 19 191 07.45 AM 7 112 0 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 2 64 6 0 72 11 1 5 0 17 208 _ Total 16 316 0 0 332 0 1 0 0 1 4 196 15 0 215 34 4 19 0 57 605 08.00 AM 6 110 2 0 118 3 0 1 0 08.15 AM 5 82 2 0 89 2 0 0 0 08:30 AM 5 87 1 0 93 1 0 0 0 _ 08:45 AM 7 74 1 0 82 0 0 2 0 Total 23 353 6 0 382 6 0 3 0 09.00 AM 3 50 1 0 54 1 0 4 0 09:15 AM 7 58 0 0 65 1 0 2 0 Grand Total 64 857 7 0 928 10 1 9 0 Apprch % 6.9 92.3 0.8 0.0 50.0 5.0 45.0 0.0 Total % 3.6 48.7 0.4 0.0 52.7 0.6 01 0.5 0.0 4 2 73 7 0 82 7 1 8 0 2 0 39 1 0 40 3 0 4 0 1 1 67 5 0 73 9 2 7 0 2 3 52 3 0 58 5 2 5 0 9 6 231 16 0 253 24 5 24 0 5 5 52 2 0 59 4 3 7 0 3 1 55 0 0 56 7 0 8 0 20 19 600 33 0 652 72 13 75 0 2.9 92.0 5.1 0.0 45.0 8.1 46.9 0.0 1.1 1.1 34.1 1.9 0.0 37.0 4.1 0.7 4.3 0.0 16 220 7 138 18 185 14 132 15 139 160 1760 9.1 Airport Drive Airport Hangar Parking Lot Airport Drive Airport Road From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds App' Right TI1ru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Total Total Total Peak Hour From 05:30 AM to 09-15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:30 AM Volume 20 401 4 0 425 Percent 47 94.4 0.9 0.0 0&00 Volume 6 110 2 0 118 Peak Factor High Int. 07:45 AM Volume 7 112 0 0 119 Peak Factor 0.893 5 0 1 0 6 83.3 0.0 16.7 0.0 3 0 1 0 4 08:00 AM 3 0 1 0 4 0.375 4 247 16 0 267 1.5 92.5 6.0 0.0 2 73 7 0 82 08:00 AM 2 73 7 0 82 0.814 33 3 23 0 59 55.9 5.1 39.0 0.0 7 1 8 0 16 07:30 AM 12 1 6 0 19 0.776 757 220 0.860 Airport Drive at Airport Road South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Study File Name : Airport Drive at Airport Road_PM Site Code : 11202008 Start Date : 11/20/2008 Page No ° 1 r,rnuna Printari- autnn Airport Drive Airport Hangar Parking Lot Airport Drive Airport Road From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Int. Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 03:30 PM 18 100 0 0 118 3 1 0 0 4 0 101 5 0 106 8 1 12 0 21 249 03:45 PM 14 75 1 0 90 0 1 1 0 2 2 128 6 0 136 8 1 20 0 29 257 _ Total 32 175 1 0 208 3 2 1 0 6 2 2.29 11 0 242 16 2 32 0 50 506 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 13 17 20 21 103 92 105 120 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 116 110 126 142 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 Total 71 420 3 0 494 3 2 8 0 05:00 PM 8 106 0 0 114 2 0 1 0 05:15 PM 15 68 0 0 83 0 0 0 0 05:30 PM 3 63 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 05:45 PM 9 46 0 0 55 2 0 0 0 Total 35 283 0 0 318 4 0 1 0 06:00 PM 2 81 0 0 83 0 0 2 0 06:15 PM 4 57 0 0 61 0 0 1 0 Grand Total 144 1016 4 0 1164 10 4 13 0 Apprch % 12.4 87.3 0.3 0.0 37.0 14.8 48.1 0.0 Total % 5.1 36.2 0.1 0.0 41 5 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.0 6 3 121 9 0 133 8 1 19 0 4 0 100 5 0 105 14 0 23 0 3 2 146 11 0 159 8 0 15 0 0 1 127 8 0 136 3 0 15 0 t 3 6 4.94 33 0 533 33 1 72 0 3 2 152 9 0 163 11 1 15 0 0 0 103 8 0 111 2 0 14 0 0 0 109 6 0 115 7 0 12 0 2 2 63 7 0 72 3 0 14 0 5 4 427 30 0 461 23 1 55 0 2 2 60 3 0 65 4 1 8 0 1 0 56 0 0 56 3 0 7 0 27 14 1266 77 0 1357 79 5 174 0 1.0 93.3 5.7 0.0 30.6 1.9 67.4 0.0 1'0 0.5 45.1 2.7 0.0 48.4 2.8 0.2 6.2 0.0 28 283 37 256 23 311 27 307 16 210 19 200 17 146 791 863 13 163 10 128 258 2806 9.2 Airport Drive Airport Hangar Parking Lot Airport Drive Airport Road From North From East From South From West _ Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds I. Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App_ I Total Total Total Total reaK Hour t-rom u i:Ju m to ub:15 Fm - NeaK 1 Ot 1 Intersection 04:15 PM Volume 66 423 3 0 492 Percent 13.4 86.0 0.6 0.0 04:30 Volume 20 105 1 0 126 Peak Factor High Int. 04:45 PM Volume 21 120 1 0 142 Peak Factor 0.866 4 1 5 0 10 40.0 10.0 50.0 0.0 1 1 1 0 3 04:15 PM 1 0 3 0 4 0.625 5 625 33 0 563 0.9 93.3 5.9 0.0 2 146 11 0 159 05:00 PM 2 152 9 0 163 0.863 36 1 68 0 105 34.3 1.0 64.8 0.0 8 0 15 0 23 04:15 PM 14 0 23 0 37 0.709 Int. Total 1170 311 0.941 Airport Drive at Airport Road South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Study File Name : Airport Drive at Airport Road_PM Site Code = 11202008 Start Date : 11 /20/2008 Page No 1 _ Groups Printed- heavy vehicles I Airport Drive Airport Hangar Parking Lot Airport Dnve Airport Road I Frnm Klr, 4h E:,- , C__4 1 C-, _ Cam. ..1 Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Appl Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds App• Int. ____ Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1 0 1.0 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 1.01 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 V J V V V U 03:45 PM 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Total 1 6 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 04:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 04:15PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05.30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05-45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BREAK - Grand Total 1 10 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 Apprch % 9.1 90.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 2.9 29.4 0.0 0.0 32.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 U U V V U u V U u U u'i 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 2 1 3 01 0 5 0 0 51 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 3 0 I 0 14 0 0 14 1 0 7 1 9 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 77.8 11.1 0.0 0.0 41.2 0.0 0.0 41.2 2.9 0.0 20.6 2.9 26.5 6 12 15 7 2 3 2 14 1 1 2 1 5 34 Airport Drive Airport Hangar Parking Lot Airport Drive Airport Road _ From North From East From South From West Start Time Right I Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds t App. Int. Total Total Total Total Total r Can r1um r1Utt1 uo.ou rivi to uu:I D rM - reaK 1 Or 1 Intersection 03:30 PM Volume 1 9 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 Percent 10.0 90.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 03:45 Volume 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int, 03:45 PM 3:15:00 PM Volume 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor 0.625 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 3 1 4 24 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 2 1 3 12 0.500 03:45 PM 03:45 PM 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 2 1 3 0.500 0.333 Airport Drive at Airport Road South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Study File Name : Airport Drive at Airport Road -PM Site Code : 11202008 Start Date ° 11 /20/2008 Page No : 1 r',rni in,, Printpri- ni itnc - hpnvv vphir•Jpc Airport Drive Airport Hangar Parking Lot Airport Drive Airport Road i From North I From East From South From West Start Time I Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds Opp' Right Thru Left Peds App. Int. Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 03:30 PM 18 103 0 0 121 3 1 0 0 4 0 101 5 0 106 8 1 12 0 21 252 03:45 PM 15 78 1 0 94 0 1 1 0 2 2 133 6 0 141 8 1_ 22 1 32 269 _ Total 33 181 1 0 215 3 2 1 0 6 2 234 11 0 247 16 2 34 1 53 521 04.00 PM 13 104 0 0 117 1 1 4 0 6 3 126 9 0 138 8 1 20 0 29 290 0415 PM 17 94 1 0 112 1 0 3 0 4 0 100 5 0 105 14 0 23 0 37 258 04:30 PM 20 106 1 0 127 1 1 1 0 3 2 146 11 0 159 9 0 16 0 25 314 04:45 PM 21 120 1 0 142 0 0 0 0 0 1 129 8 0 138 3 0 15 0 18 298 _ Total 71 424 3 0 498 3 2 8 0 13 6 501 33 0 540 34 1 74 0 109 1160 05:00 PM 8 106 0 0 114 2 0 1 0 05.15 PM 15 68 0 0 83 0 0 0 0 05:30 PM 3 63 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 05:45 PM 9 46 0 0 55 2 0 0 0 Total 35 283 0 0 318 4 0 1 0 06:00 PM 2 81 0 0 83 0 0 2 0 06:15 PM 4 57 0 0 61 0 0 1 0 Grand Total 145 1026 4 0 1175 10 4 13 0 Apprch % 12.3 87.3 03 0.0 37.0 14.8 48.1 0.0 Total % 5.1 36.1 0.1 0.0 41.4 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.0 3 2 152 9 0 163 11 1 16 0 0 0 103 8 0 111 2 0 15 0 0 0 111 6 0 117 7 0 12 0 2 2 63 7 0 72 3 0 15 0 5 4 4.29 30 0 463 23 1 58 0 2 2 60 3 0 65 4 1 8 0 1 0 56 0 0 56 3 0 7 0 27 14 1280 77 0 1371 80 5 181 1 1.0 93.4 5.6 0.0 30.0 1.9 67.8 0.4 1.0 0.5 45.1 2.7 0.0 48.3 2.8 0.2 6.4 0.0 28 308 17 211 19 202 18 147 13 163 10 128 267 2840 9.4 Airport Drive Airport Hangar Parking Lot Airport Drive Airport Road From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App, Total Int. Total Total Total F'eaK Flour t-rom uj:3U YIN to uo:lb vm - reaK l Or 1 Intersection 04:15 PM Volume 66 426 3 0 495 Percent 13.3 86.1 0.6 0.0 04.30 Volume 20 106 1 0 127 Peak Factor High Int. 04:45 PM Volume 21 120 1 0 142 Peak Factor 0.871 4 1 5 0 10 5 527 33 0 565 40.0 10.0 50.0 0.0 0.9 93.3 5.8 0.0 1 1 1 0 3 2 146 11 0 159 04:15 PM 05:00 PM 1 0 3 0 4 2 152 9 0 163 0.525 0.867 37 1 70 0 108 1178 34.3 0.9 64.8 0.0 9 0 16 0 25 314 0.938 04:15 PM 14 0 23 0 37 0.730 ` .ter .........� Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 12: Airport Road & Airport Drive 3/30/2009 Lane Configurations cr *T+ 4+ Vj '-5 87 '0 7 23',:-- -8- 28 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free 'jo NO Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 23'MI-OF Pedestrians Walking Speed Otis) Right turn flare (veh) I wd! Median storage Veh) pX, platoon unblocked 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 pogliq uol 74fi 7$§ vC1, stage 1 conf Vol vCu, unblocked Vol 707 702 376 741 714 242 390 245 7: tC, 2 stage (s) ' rd pO queue free % 61 99 94 100 100 99 98 100 '2- z:7 Volume Left 30 1 23 6 7 cSH 440 633 1174 •1254 Ni 1. Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 1 1 0 0 0 Al, t C V "'',w Ik Lane LOS 8 B A A Mag MIN 8 Approach LOS B B Average Delay 1.8 Qf-ghe I h 'a 00 aft Analysis Period (min) 15 2009 Design Hour Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Morning Peak Hour Page 5 1 - Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 12: Airport Road & Airport Drive 3/3112009 Lane Configurations V -4 At'd n T J. I.- z1. 4 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free OF% 00 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 hi T7 2 tl Pedestrians Lane YV Walking Speed (ft/s) ge Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 'N �C,coriflQ, .2 T_ T _8 0., Gn vC1, stage 1 conf vol v02, stag6 2 vcu, unblocked vol ­1248 1246 540 1282 1292 456 580 460 sifigza( 7. f; .5 Us tC, 2 stage (s) -5 zit pO queue free % 33 99 94 98 99 99 96 100 ... .. .. IM, .. . ... . 6 4 Volume Total 108 7 708 582 Volume Left 76 2 44 2 cSH 148 198 999 889 Queue Length 95th (ft) 109 3 3 0 elay 760 23t IT Lane LOS F C A A t Approach LOS F C r IWO Average Delay 6.6 �iecubn Ca0a"C' !1Y 9 % N10 .. . .... .. Analysis Period (min) 15 2009 Design Hour Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 5 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 12: Airport Road & Airport Drive 3/31/2009, Lane Configurations 4* V 77 3500 2" Sign Control Stop stop Free Free 00, 0/6 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 J7 RY Pedestrians e� Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) el Median storage veh)- pX, platoon unblocked 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 fl%&g" ONE-, $1 vC1, stage 1 confvol 'A" vCu, unblocked vol 1256 1254 540 1289 1300 462 580 466 ;.c I lawyo -1 1,1,— NK RM tC, 2 stage (s) po queu•e free % 32 99 94 98 99 99 9 5 100 M Volume 'Left 77 2 45 2 ij"V cSH 146 196 999 886 RON —TiMm" ARK-11irfl, Queue Length 95th (ft) 112 3 4 0 0 IN 41" �- 7, � �:, n� '4 � A, f , 6 - - 1XQ ffl;tt " 'Q Lane LOS F � C A A N' Approach LOS F C Average Delay 6.9 @ --k '' Analysis Period (min) 15 2011 No Build Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 5 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 12: Airport Road & Airport Drive 3/31/2009 Lane Configurations Uotne'ye�iJt 2 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free 60/0 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 r_�:_:::;::::,,.�i 31Jt=? - _ .. _ , Pedestrians Walking Speed ON - Right turn Hare (veh) +�Ct« _ - _ - _ _ _ - - �(n2FF IT�":� . _ _ Rya• Li. Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 -u, �:>vQ' f iG},n' ,uo '_�� f3-rQ-jD' ; ':1� • • �: 55G= :' ::. - �75 �::.'izi[)[r.'��„i�a[ 59$�-::[r...� �3>,' � `� vC1, stage 1 conf vol _':#_��'�to.;�fi���'i', w31.:' �'� -, , ,. �>< trC2; sfa e�2, oi�f,_ p^ vCu, unblocked vol 1289 1287 556 1322 1335 475 598 479 0€ 4 tC, 2 stage (s) _ 7, ' p0 queue free % 27 99 94 98 99 99 95 ~ 100 i a YYYpppppp�� "vrr `�-:•-..::�:�-; :;5 1 ' -, -; '',1 f :•_� �'''.':-.. .�,- _ 8{�} p[ .:_1.�C.�'�,_ .�.. 7 ° _ 723: OP Volume Left 78 2 45 2 -�_+-: —�.ry• - _ - � -0_s, �n] .:..= cSH Srxf7- C'•-1n�. _- zr.,.���:_, :>y:.- . �• L; ?; 8'.� w1r ,C _,r'-�* x'f, � = G G_ F IM ..,�,'?F --uisYa�%rtrzb:�F,;u ;,.ny_ha}e.�tzr 138 188 984 �876 W Queue Length 95th (ft) 122 3 4 0 Lane LOS C A A its ��,-,.. ,1,>^7 : �`:F.E•,Qr 4�2's'�ii'��?�: 7'ie Cfix i. _.: KMf�:�i'2.«:.: `5.. (][(F 92�: rii ,, 2 !', c :�d[e irr�iiilej' --. - ,_ - -, _ - .. I:i•_ 'L.�a�i��5. �'��-; T,-:�` ���'�"Y.Y::r.:.'Y - - _ _ - _ Approach LOS F C Average Delay 7.8 fntefs ' c oc a -ac l il-' Analysis Period (min) 15 2011 DHV Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 5 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 12: Airport Road & Airport Drive 3/30/2009 WORN, al-1-1 Lane Configurations 79 32 _2 4 4-OW R."- Sign lControl Stop Stop Free Free N ON Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 12..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 011R, 1111"T'S All 1" 11� A It., `01 6!W, j-"" I I "at 33 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ftis") Right turn flare (veh) G" Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 • vG1ge , sta1 conf vol 6 111,12", HIR640 5-11". 110 - vCu, unblocked vol 1296 1297 554 1333 1344 488 595 491 J� tc, 2 stage (s) 4- pO queue free % 25 99 94 98 99 99 95 100 St V -: Volume Left 79 2 46 2 MNOR 42 cSH 137 185 986 869 V o .a ys , , - - 41 ' 'MIN& 0.1". Queue Lenth 95th (ft) 128 3 4 0 Lane LOS F D A A 11.0IN101,11 4-014411-111011f 10,10 -�_ I,` z �Y i F.4.' "'I'l W"I k 'p Approach LOS F D Average Delay 8.2 In % qdf�o# 40,44(0� , zi 166, Analysis Period (min) 15 M 1152 11 2016 No Build Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 5 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 12: Airport Road & Airport Drive 3/30/2009 „�.�..w�,,,_"'_'?:ir„' W-: `F3': - - � r..`+n1r wF F:.� a, �;^ •�;i-:. �,y�.';--r�.;.r- rrT� q'.;i.3r '-;cam.,•' .�i'rvi �"^" :::'x:4T.�<-.-•e— _ - ��r,UJa�:?v�:sty{'.2'_.;�i2.�..i'M`�'�,,..-,...e:'gnrcE'.`.'•,-T•:�.:�K'�.'�Cw•�DpT}s�'3':...;�,'�'..-.,-t, .'•<-r'���L�;-�.•.�':'s:%.� ?".-.,. r.,: ir-,- .ems<;: Lane Configurations ter, i/AI 8- Y fr Jrs` 2 t= 4.: . , 4: >- 7fI8.: fir: x 2 558.9 Sign Control stop StopFree Free Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 32 2 , .'_1��' �;•t;��=t�}fi;�: - -7Q81��-�v. 6_�:LL. 2:.� , '558 _ $' Pedestrians I Walking Speed (ft/s) Perch'`. . , .. Right tum flare (veh) - '•i, ,lam..., . - _ - _ _ : _: 4�;;j_ ':. _ - 1 `+�"1rttMtiLy'i�'tt 77i1 ~- iil= Median storage veh) II :' •.. _ ... -.:..: ,. � ==;; :5�', A ' .: _•.. ;, . pX, Platoon unblocked 0.81'<.; 0.81 0.81 0.81 0...•; 0.81 - ;L:-T' : - - --ice' :z:. uC.=�. •:n31 �fi dtUrr%- 4c ! rite. 4 - f 4 -�,V,,.. �#' � - , 4 _ - ,.,L •�; s ^ _ ._ '.�f�i�'�i� � t•SF - 4 -• � LL, - - _ " - - - _; ! s -- � - __. vCi, stage 1 conf vol _ ...___::, ..:,�_� r�., . -.,� �n„ r,.:. . ............... - ._,....,_--.,..,.:�.. •-•- ... . �. ,. . vCu, unblocked vol 1394 1392 602 1428 1443 523 647 527 -pip -.-�`57.:, _-, ...- -' .i� �?irr"l:-.S �n; .. ,- ..:Sg.�:.., _r'�:6.. �r tC, 2 stage (s) t� S. QQf►. ..�4:�'y.,�.�,..,3.3=�, ,:�1y�',5�� . �4.Q,;,- :(r:•3.:-E€•_.2�2". re:h_r�... p0 queue free /° 9 99 94 98 99 99 95 100 '•veli/fr ,, . a f ° ; r n '1.:'- '4:'i ;. tXrit{�Me:,otal 41 7.--_7Gf0'- Volume Left 82 2 46 2 ...,� .:..pry cSH 117 163 943 844 •fl.: yew F, _ -- .- ... .. sre--r:uc,.- r Queue Length 95th (ft) 161 3 4 0 to>ef47Hwy Lane LOS F ?i3, ,_' >:; • -.M ii D A A ' ' _ -=_ :u%�;r yiimi,r_•,x�,c ..�. Approach LOS F - —ldu� � xeE-siiic'7::5 sa�r - a; � •,`�u:pw - - _ - - - - �_ ix¢:•!= �"= - - - - �•- E wm,s;,fa:a�;-::::s:'i:'�_��Kii'.^°e=i;SsE �`:r.�:-: =5;;"-;' ^'^ �i£. w:•F.} -1 �'�<i%�' -....:.-:Y<,.,:.:.:�,:u`ye.v.'_y::ec3r:,.:oxn:: x.,=-�•:,ro-...,�,r.; ,.z .�� 'e}.; - q;z:, D �'�'J _ 'r., �,`�6?'.�`I�y�'-'.--u `;�ri,"���� ZZ���$•c?�;,C��':°..--..;,�tiv��'-�i�^•-•F� -�.. �„���Fm����ika�,n Average Delay 11.9 Cfiu, tNl - _ _1�1:::.. _ ::Y,.-.�' "(::: � y' - :•^LTM- •C:,i 1:7 :_ _ _ -� L.:' � - s+sA�+`e: _ _ •y �I:ie=.�"t'-'iY�:-. -:5`., ` .�,_..,,,<,,,.. } .:i ,,,,_..,..._...,«..._.i:;,.,:, -,..." __' :._t__.,i_. . .......... ... -- - - . e .. go-.._, •...__- Analysis Period (min) 15 2016 Design Hour Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 5 AIRPORT ENTRANCE f N PATRICK STREET1_1I 2i0 14' I G� 01 �1N0 9- I I PSG QO� � I 'ONLY _ 0 18' I 1 ' 10' o w Z o o w AVIATRON Ln cD ENTRANCE a o � � cr- ~ N Q \ O j \ NOT TO SCALE BUS STOP South Budingl°n V—t EXISTING CONDITION: INTERSECTION #3 Study INTERSECTION BuningtGT.tematlmmlNry°rt TnR�c INTERSECTION OF AIRPORT ENTRANCE/ Sbnbc Galuultlng Suvlus Inc 55 ° AND AIRPORT DRIVE a, 195310247 3710/2W9 Machine Recorded Traffic Count Summary Airport Entrance Road Wednesday 11/19/2008 15 min. Hourly 15 min. Hourly 15 min. Hour y min. our y TIME Volume Volume TIME Volume Volume TIME Volume Volume TIME Volume Volume 00:00 0 06:00 0 12:00 39 18:00 31 00:15 0 06:15 0 12:15 39 18:15 21 00:30 0 06:30 0 12:30 41 18:30 20 00:45 0 0 06:45 0 0 12:45 25 144 18:45 21 93 01:00 0 07:00 0 13:00 36 19:00 12 01:15 0 07:15 0 13:15 27 19:15 8 01:30 0 07:30 0 13:30 43 19:30 20 01:45 0 0 07:45 0 0 13:45 48 154 19:45 13 53 02:00 0 08:00 0 14:00 28 20:00 8 02:15 0 08:15 0 14:15 22 20:15 7 02:30 0 08:30 0 14:30 39 20:30 9 02:45 0 0 08:45 0 0 14:45 40 129 20:45 14 38 03:00 0 09:00 0 15:00 49 21:00 19 03:15 0 09:15 0 15:15 57 21:15 16 03:30 0 09:30 0 15:30 52 21:30 31 03:45 0 0 09:45 0 0 15:45 64 222 21:45 34 100 04:00 0 10:00 0 16:00 57 22:00 19 04-15 0 10:15 0 16:15 42 22:15 39 04:30 0 10:30 0 16:30 48 22:30 41 04:45 0 0 10:45 0 0 16:45 54 201 22:45 16 115 05:00 0 11:00 0 17:00 42 2100 21 05:15 0 11:15 30 38 23:15 12 05:30 0 11:30 52 E17:405 30 , 64' 23:30 1123:451 16 05:45 0 0 11:45 41 123 19 129 12 61 Machine Recorded Traffic Count Summary Airport Entrance Road Thursday 11/20/2008 15 min. Hourly 15 min. Hourly 15 min. Hourly 15 min. Hourly TIME Volume Volume TIMEJ Volume Volume TIME Volume Volume TIME Volume Volume 00:00 9 06:00 47 1 7- 12.00 62 18:00 31 00:15 13 0615 24 12:15 57 18:15 29 00:30 5 06:30 23 12:30 44 18:30 25 00:45 1 28 06:45 20 114 12:45 49 212 18-45 21 106 01.00 1 07:00 13 13:00 41 19:00 24 01:15 1 07:15 29 13:15 31 19:15 20 01.30 2 07:30 24 13:30 35 19:30 11 01:45 0 4 07:45 26 92 13:45 52 159 19:45 10 65 02-00 1 08:00 21 14:00 44 20:00 8 02:15 0 08:15 16 14:15 41 20:15 8 02:30 0 08:30 28 14:30 35 20:30 8 02-45 2 3 08:45 31 96 14:45 35 155 20:45 10 34 03:00 3 09:00 34 15:00 55 21-00 11 03:15 3 09:15 43 15:15 83 21:15 16 03:30 2 09:30 42 15:30 81 21:30 24 03:45 13 21 09:45 47 166 15:45 89 308 21:45 42 93 04:00 21 10:00 56 16:00 60 22:00 46 04:15 35 10:15 59 16:15 69 22:15 28 04:30 76 10:30 56 16:30 80 22:30 30 04:45 117 249 10:45 46 217 16:45 57 266 22:45 35 139 05:00 82 11:00 36 17:00 34 23:00 24 05:15 52 11:15 61 17:15 34 23:15 45 05:30 48 11:30 40 17:30 34 1::+' 23:30 43 05:45 48 230 1 11:45 52 189 17:45 39 141 23:45 26 138 ! at::,ti}' , !'.iztEe klf lrlllg adjacent shf°ut peak hoLlr ( at Route 2) 4 30 - 5 30 PM Airport Drive at Airport Entrance South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Stdaiye Name : Airport Drive at Airport Entrance -AM Site Code 11192008 Start Date ; 11/19/2008 Page No : 1 f'4rminc PrinfAd- aufrte Airport Drive From North Airport Entrance Only From East Airport Drive From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 06:30 AM 06:45 AM 0 0 36 7 58 6 0 0 43 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 15 19 0 27 0 0 0 32 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 106 Total 0 94 13 0 107 0 0 0 0 0 28 46 0 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 181 07:00 AM 0 41 6 0 47 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 77 4 0 81 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 64 9 0 73 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 111 8 0 119 0 0 0 0 Total 0 293 27 0 320 0 0 0 0 08:00 AM 0 87 8 0 95 0 0 0 0 08:15 AM 0 113 3 0 116 0 0 0 0 08:30 AM 0 80 12 0 92 0 0 0 0 08:45 AM 0 74 11 0 85 0 0 0 0 _ Total 0 354 34 0 388 0 0 0 0 09:00 AM 0 60 14 0 74 0 0 0 0 09-15 AM 0 66 19 0 85 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 867 107 0 974 0 0 0 0 Apprch % 0.0 89.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 52.6 6.5 0.0 59.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 7 12 15 16 34 45 41 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 57 56 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 138 129 212 0 50 197 0 0 247 0 0 0 0 0 567 0 14 47 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 156 0 8 46 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 170 0 15 40 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 147 0 13 49 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 147 0 50 182 0 0 232 0 0 0 0 0 620 0 20 29 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 123 0 28 44 0 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 157 0 176 498 0 0 674 0 0 0 0 0 1648 26.1 73.9 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.7 30.2 0.0 0.0 40.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Airport Drive Airport Entrance Only AirportDnve From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds gyp' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds I App' I Total Total Total Total PeaK Hour t-rom Ub:JU AM to U9:15 AM - PeaK 1 01 1 Intersection 07:45 AM Volume 0 391 31 0 422 0 0 0 0 0 53 210 0 0 263 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 92.7 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.2 79.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 07:45 Volume 0 111 8 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 16 77 0 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int. 07:45 AM 6:15:00 AM 07:45 AM 6:15:00 AM Volume 0 111 8 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 16 77 0 0 93 Peak Factor 0.887 0.707 Int. Total 685 212 0.808 - - - - - - • --- - - ------- Airport Drive at Airport Entrance South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Stula4e Name : Airport Drive at Airport Entrance -AM Site Code = 11192008 Start Date 11 /19/2008 Page No : 1 r,mtins PrintArl- hPavv vahirJac Airport Drive From North Airport Entrance Only From East Airport Drive From South From West j Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left[Eeds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total i Factor 1.0 1 0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0 1-01 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 06:30 AM 06:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 Total 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 5 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 01 5 07.00 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 07.15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 07.30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 07.45 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 10 08:00 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 08,15 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 08 45 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 Total 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 14 09 00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 09:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 Grand Total 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 36 Apprch % 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 36.1 0.0 0.0 36.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.9 0.0 0.0 63.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Airport Drive Airport Entrance Only Airport Drive From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total FeaK Flour From UU'.5U AM 10 Uy:It, AM - reaK l OT l Intersection 08:15 AM Volume 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 Percent 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 08:45 Volume 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 Peak Factor High Int. 08:15 AM 6:15:00 AM 08:15 AM Volume 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 Peak Factor 0.583 1.000 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 6:15:00 AM In Total 15 5 0.750 Airport Drive at Airport Entrance South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Stuffje Name : Airport Drive at Airport Entrance -AM Site Code 11192008 Start Date _ 11 /19/2008 Page No : 1 rlrn,- Drinko,i_ -f- _ k-,., vnhirlec. Airport Drive Airport Entrance Only Airport Drive From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Int. __ Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 101 1-01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 06:30 AM 0 36 7 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 13 20 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 76 06:45 AM 0 58 6 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 15 31 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 110 Total 0 94 13 0 107 0 0 0 0 0 28 51 0 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 186 07:00 AM 0 43 6 0 49 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 77 4 0 81 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 64 9 0 73 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 112 8 0 120 0 0 0 0 Total 0 296 27 0 323 0 0 0 0 08.00 AM 0 89 8 0 97 0 0 0 0 08.15 AM 0 116 3 0 119 0 0 0 0 08:30 AM 0 80 12 0 92 0 0 0 0 08:45 AM 0 77 11 0 88 0 0 0 0 Total 0 362 34 0 396 0 0 0 0 09.00 AM 0 61 14 0 75 0 0 0 0 09-15 AM 0 67 19 0 86 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 880 107 0 987 0 0 0 0 Apprch % 0.0 89.2 10.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 52.3 6.4 0.0 58.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 7 36 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 12 48 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 15 43 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 16 77 0 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 50 204 0 0 254 0 0 0 0 0 14 47 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 8 48 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 15 42 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 13 51 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 50 188 0 0 238 0 0 0 0 0 20 31 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 28 47 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 176 521 0 0 697 0 0 0 0 25.3 74.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.5 30.9 0.0 0.0 41.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 92 0 141 0 131 0 213 0 577 0 158 0 175 0 149 0 152 01 634 01 126 0 161 0 1684 0.0 Airport Drive Airport Entrance Only_ Airport Drive From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds %p' Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Int. Total Total Total Total Total rear, now morn vu.au AM ry vy: 10 AM - reaK I OT I Intersection 07 45 AM Volume 0 397 31 0 428 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 92.8 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 07:45 Volume 0 112 8 0 120 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int. 07A5 AM 6:15:00 AM Volume 0 112 8 0 120 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor 0.892 0 53 214 0 0 267 0 0 0 0 0 695 19.9 80.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 16 77 0 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 213 0.816 07:45 AM 6:15:00 AM 0 16 77 0 0 93 0.718 Airport Drive at Airport Entrance South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact StLiaiye Name : Airport Drive at Airport Entrance -PM Site Code : 11192008 Start Date : 11/19/2008 Page No 1 (rrr n� PrinYcrl_ ouhnc _ Airport Drive From North Airport Entrance Only From East Airport Drive From South From West Start Time R�htThr, Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Factor 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 1 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0 03:30 PM _ 03:45 PM 0 0 99 20 93 18 0 0 119 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 46 83 0 78 0 0 0 114 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 233 235 Total 0 192 38 0 230 0 0 0 0 0 77 161 0 0 238 0 0 0 0 0 468 04.00 PM 04:15 PM 04.30 PM 04-45 PM 0 0 0 0 109 110 102 119 26 19 17 19 0 0 0 0 135 129 119 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 440 81 0 521 0 0 0 0 05:00 PM 0 119 27 0 146 0 0 0 0 05.15 PM 0 90 8 0 98 0 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 63 15 0 78 0 0 0 0 05:45 PM 0 56 8 0 64 0 0 0 0 Total 0 328 58 0 386 0 0 0 0 06:00 PM 0 57 7 0 64 0 0 0 0 06:15 PM 0 49 12 0 61 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 1066 196 0 1262 0 0 0 0 Apprch % 0.0 84.5 15.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 00 40.7 7.5 0.0 48.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 30 99 0 0 129 0 0 0 0 0 24 88 0 0 112 0 0 0 0 0 27 151 0 0 178 0 0 0 0 0 26 108 0 0 134 0 0 0 0 0 107 446 0 0 553 0 0 0 0 0 19 148 0 0 167 0 0 0 0 0 24 98 0 0 122 0 0 0 0 0 17 71 0 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 9 50 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 69 367 0 0 436 0 0 0 0 0 23 53 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 11 46 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 287 1073 0 0 1360 0 0 0 0 21.1 78.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.9 40.9 0.0 0.0 51.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01 264 0 241 0 297 01 1074 0 313 0 220 0 166 0 123 01 822 0 140 0 118 0 2622 0.0 Airport Drive Airport Entrance Only Airport Drive From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Total PeaK hour rrom u s: 0 PM to uti:1 to PM - PeaK 1 or 1 Intersection 04:15 PM Volume 0 450 82 0 532 0 0 0 0 0 96 495 0 0 591 0 0 0 0 0 1123 Percent 0.0 84.6 15.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.2 83.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 05.00 Volume 0 119 27 0 146 0 0 0 0 0 19 148 0 0 167 0 0 0 0 0 313 Peak Factor 0.897 High Int. 05:00 PM 3:15:00 PM 04:30 PM 3:15:00 PM Volume 0 119 27 0 146 0 0 0 0 0 27 151 0 0 178 Peak Factor 0.911 0.830 Airport Drive at Airport Entrance South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact StLfid -- Name : Airport Drive at Airport Entrance -PM Site Code ; 11192008 Start Date : 11/19/2008 Page No :1 r,rrn ms Printari- hPavv vahirJas Airport Drive Airport Entrance only Airport Drive From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left I Peds Appl Right Thru Left Peds Appl Right Thru Left Pods App. Right Thru Left Peds App. Ina. Total Total Total Total Total r-_ -Factor 1.01 1.0 1-0 j 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.01 1.0 1 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 03:45 PM 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 04.00 PM 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 6 04:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 04.30 PM 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 9 04.45 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 7 Total 0 5 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 9 11 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 28 05.00 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 05-15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 05 30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 05-45 PM 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 _ Total 0 5 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 " BREAK '** Grand Total 0 14 4 0 18 0 0 0 0 Apprch % 0.0 778 22.2 00 I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 326 9.3 0.0 41.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0- 01 2 0I 14 11 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 43 56.0 44.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 32.6 25.6 0.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Airport Drive Airport Entrance only Airport Drive From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Appl Right Thru Left Peds Appl Right Thru Left Peds App Right Thru Left Peds Ap Total Total Totall Tot reaK mour t-rom us:,su t m io ub:io t m - reaK 1 or -1 Intersection 04:00 PM Volume 0 5 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 62.5 37.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 04:30 Volume 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int 04:30 PM 3:15:00 PM Volume 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor 0.500 0 9 11 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 45.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 3:15:00 PM 0 5 1 0 0 6 0.833 p. Int. al Total 0 28 0 9 0.778 Airport Drive at Airport Entrance South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact StdW Name : Airport Drive at Airport Entrance -PM Site Code = 11192008 Start Date : 11 /19/2008 Page No : 1 Arnllns Printed- autns - hPavv vehicles Airport Drive Airport Entrance Only Airport Drive I From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Appl Right Thru Left Peds Appl Right Thru Left Peds Appl Right Thru Left Peds App. Ina. Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.0 63.3 PPM 0 99 20 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 32 83 0 0 115 0 0 0 0 0 234 03.45 PM 0 97 18 0 1151 0 0 0 0 0 46 78 0 0 124 0 0 0 0 0 239 Total 0 196 38 0 2341 0 0 0 0 01 78 161 0 0 239 0 0 0 0 0 473 04.00 PM 0 110 27 0 137 0 0 0 0 0 31 102 0 0 133 0 0 0 0 0 270 04:15 PM 0 111 19 0 130 0. 0 0 0 0 25 92 0 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 247 04.30 PM 0 105 18 0 123 0 0 0 0 0 29 154 0 0 183 0 0 0 0 0 306 04:45 PM 0 119 20 0 139 0 0 0 0 0 31 109 0 0 140 0 0 0 0 0 279 Total 0 445 84 0 529 0 0 0 0 0 116 457 0 0 573 0 0 0 0 0 1102 05.00 PM 0 121 27 0 148 0 0 0 0 0 19 148 0 0 167 0 0 0 0 0 315 05.15 PM 0 91 8 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 25 98 0 0 123 0 0 0 0 0 I 222 05-30 PM 0 64 15 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 18 71 0 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 168 05:45 PM 0 57 9 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 9 50 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 01 125 Total 0 333 59 0 392 0 0 0 0 0 71 367 0 0 438 0 0 0 0 01 830 06:00 PM 0 57 7 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 25 53 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 142 06:15 PM 0 49 12 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 11 46 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 118 Grand Total 0 1080 200 0 1280 0 0 0 0 0 301 1084 0 0 1385 0 0 0 0 0 2665 Apprch % 0.0 844 15.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 00 40.5 7.5 0.0 48.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 40.7 0.0 0.0 52.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Airport Drive Airport Entrance Only Airport Drive From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App, Total Int. Total Total Total Peak Hour From 03:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04.15 PM Volume 0 456 84 0 540 0 0 0 0 0 104 503 0 0 607 Percent 0.0 84.4 15.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.1 82.9 0.0 0.0 05.00 Volume 0 121 27 0 148 0 0 0 0 0 19 148 0 0 167 Peak Factor High Int. 05:00 PM 3:15:00 PM 04:30 PM Volume 0 121 27 0 148 0 0 0 0 0 29 154 0 0 183 Peak Factor 0.912 0.829 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 3:15:00 PM 1147 315 0.910 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 9: Airport Drive & Airport Circle Entrance 3/30/2009 t r Lane Configurations r I t o113r_tle //veh/h t. 2-t('si' i IT 39 ': =,: E#MG _,=:.L: ,!AY•�, R Sign Control Free Free Stop r�( _.,_. _ . ..... ., .. fib/o% Peak Hour Factor 1.00{� 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00i. 1.00 io't►��LyG:(k�b4i!I i';:rt:�,• .., `.i.<:.:; i^'M1 'C'{=iCiir ;`RI"�,� 'p 6:,:2r..$9 '4:(yen<<1�;3R,��:_�t;':.,,:,-;T'1;;. .. .��c-#:r.. _:.r:II•= .,,L...x.....il. Pedestrians -0 I Walking Speed (fus) Right turn flare (veh) :r,....wmm • a - , r; � .. - -�rt;trr,::ri inn`; ' � ,. +M __ _ .._aa- - - - , Median storage veh) tom; r - pX, platoon unblocked ?9, uglririt :...... 3 1 E ti vC1, stage 1 conf vol ... .... ,; VI].- I..e7d' - -, - -.,, •' - -- -- ,y�j'4t�;J,e'•{+:�0�}Ii _h vCu, unblocked vol -. - - ... .-- - ---= --- --- 331 835 264 w tC_, 2 stage (s) 3� - p0 queue free % 9.7 100 100 -,. NINE ff It —49 Left 0 0 39 0 pVolume 9'%. - . � 4.t,,�, ���'�iw'nS.':e:i��?�•�=:s'eJ - .. ._- , .. • ' - „-. ._ � ' cSH 1700 1700 1228 1700 , ci .gym h 95th ft Queue Length O 0 2 0 alaYS ' F ,- L insILL' lR j ,. ....,, .,- �,� ..I.. .,•.1 ...t^C• �A Lane LOS AIARNP 1,10 ONE' Approach LOS '�S"' Z�iv y��',���;;lp,�'S.,»r,_n,4<:'r;4F��T�-'i'ar:�a<F,��,xkr ix" icr=. �,y'fi.w,-.. �a�.rt�'.�,'., ;�:-er�<rro-:r•»'c ,. �,•'- Xn�,. �,y.-;v•rr�w:\,r ��t ����, �3� fi".Y. iN: S- IS C U��ii'.T• � S�� � KiR�,. �� •''!�'�� .tSE� .G'r`<::. ti�eJ'-'��Pst3_rr �...n ,.dam _ L"., .:��, ti��«i;;>�.: N3.:,,4�...t).t�,ktarx-a`- x�,„8�i4;>'�:-;�.,�.�•,�•'��:n Average Delay 0.4 - - ':ik: �!t :� ..;t..7;;,,s:�__n��;Ii� I�lt'r��c�o�.Ca a i :. ���f�.}}I•-����,�:� .a+Ix.r. - � �. �R� r...li'..,i.��t �i F C:... �� a � i��l ;•:r_„u - c :r! Yiie""�;=_ = , .. ,, s. uc::_..,_-__ _ _ 29: /° I��yni' t+-� ,�,,(�,}� 4 ., �<<Et �j:,:•,:�;,;::.. A ,?�_ . , e�� �r!�`!:S;�F,4:+�'},I�Qi1�tt,�4A2s._..� -tics-r.�:i�•.'-,ii=,?!u� r'V�:! i:t2_ Analysis Period (min) 15 s 2009 Design Hour Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Morning Peak Hour Page 4 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 9: Airport Drive & Airport Circle Entrance 3/31/2009 r , t/ Lane Configurations r I T Sign Control Free Free Stop ta'rdde; DJo' Okla 0% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0=: Pedestrians Brie " ( `1 Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent i�ioc�, Right turn flare (veh) _..,. __ ._•_ : __:.: - : •: < >.. .. __:.: _.- _�,.; .,.:... - = Median storage veh) C10sff'ea .- gf*N. pX, platoon unblocked - - - :::1 is I. _ "n _3to ulna cob I"64 S ITT vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 761 1360 629 _. r ... . -- - tC, 2 stage (s) tP 22- p0 queue free % 89 100 100 N('a - 14 y_f;: w,.. .'�' .�J,'.-`M^a, i4%%L;t�'votr�".�"�tabx�«,,a�•��,c-`i�E i..y��yS�u ��� .�q^�1yr.a=°f.'-•�185r:� '-'Miry: vJs?.waRl; +S'w-...-,a?x=•:n '.L i����.•C-,s+"i�CC=.`^Y�53'r�,•`tE,r^,.+;.X�C.=.;:'-_•iY: "`IY�*M„�a...: a�-"_� _ a+r.S.f�i:�^"'ci'_�:L ���:•s�.Zf:¢i��..��'u- Volume Total 629 132 93 545 Volume Left 0 0 93 0 q�1 I p:::- cSH 1700 1700 851 1700 Tim m, Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 9 0 i;:;.:_,` Lane LOS A Approach LOS µx ••.:C.w are »`i':e':1::1 �' Average Delay 0.6 :- - I�te��ectohCa"_a�t 'U:44 % (Cil�:bevelof°:Servree_.,.::;,,:;•-:•,;-::.::;=;<:,:..:•:._-A<:::--..:::__•,..-:..� ; ::��::::::_:, - Analysis Period (min) 15 2009 Design Hour Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 4 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 9: Airport Drive & Airport Circle Entrance 3/31/2009 f t r 1( t/ Lane Configurations r �olu�e'(veh�fx') 13Q�:' 9� 5d�.. - C).' �.����'�,��-�_�.��4'.-, -.,- °- ' :-• Sign Control Free Free Stop - a 43l o Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourte' :.:� 5"G Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) NYEI',c t,r,.� Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked u ,eon r ::voft� . vC1, stage 1 conf vol _ >� , vCu, unblocked vol 766 1363 6 36 II-: - NOR tC, 2�stage (s) 2i2'::' 1 .8 „ queue free / p0 q 8�9 10 0 100 ca , o u', e:,1• fi31a 130 9ii :'.=...;45 - Volumee Left 0 0 91 0 Mr,.. - iLtr���=•:;, .' _,-'�..,,•,:!', .�2^iit:ni1z5Y;1 _ F!ifEQ cSH 1700 1700 847 1700 COME 1191 (ft) 0 Queue Length 95th0 9 0- _ T ^ Lane LOS A Approach LOS LiFN,„'�"ni:N .�xiivdv .� XX w�,t¢._v,� cev>�gi��`��=1�iv�e'�i.�;F�`�,— `tis l.=yFi`.�•, �. 7 C`1�:' w'S�" -�?`i ."'Sq�n•-Y"'S�: uY"'Sxcs� -n- ,1~.'"�':t'n°i ri ',�� c"^'1�.r-.,:;�: u.w''^'''''-ra�'�...-�'_'- f�rk A��v��K�• 'ate_. �� ' '^ �^�.f �s ������� '�. �dK.^" ,�.•t��� ✓; iAl•.lr..'P.� _! F J-M=.r.- .�`". Myl t�.•J�4.9,� nKJ,lr � f.'.'i`.R�,:e^tiK"Av i��" - " Average Delay 0.6 Analysis Period (min) 15 2011 No Build Volumes HCM Unsignal .e Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 4 Burlington International Airport- Traffic Study Stantec 9: Airport Drive & Airport Circle Entrance 3/31/2009 Lane Configurations + if Sign Control Free Free Stop Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.0_0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,60 _ ­.1 W aC'rr . Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) I±ned) ter' s'T� �,•;�:; [a . rkl-AR Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked ' vC1, stage 1 conf Vol 62, vCu, unblocked Vol - 777 1397 ` 63 6 _. r het 6 tC, 2 stage (s) '... 2:2 - _.100.... ; :< <. :.... .... ...... . :...,. - . pO queue free % 88 100 W ,.ca ae etfi7h 737 Volt' e=TQ _= .: =;99- 503 Vo;ume Left 0 0 99 0 cSH 1700 1700 839 1700 ` Queue Ler;gth 95th (ft) 0 0 10 0 oiitroG'.De�r:�s: Lane LOS A PtpMela Approach l_OS aF f r •:!s.'r�';r�'�--sw sa„�2��'F-w _� ^_.� �-' �- - —r��:� `s�-. .,7zy-•.rs—.. wzu, r'ir: iYNV's J'%.T'..Y.R�-\'J,.s'-A•t••_'�`.,"y �'-h,:M iSY•�'i"�".�, ,y.'^sKe-mJr rN A'S.Yn`.z1'i1�'.• >Y�µ,SL','.,'S,.-.,vu.'LKy 11 cq;- ����tc,.�.�.�s��''d:"•t.,�n�--'.`';�,r�.z��Y�—� s: �=- Average Dela., 0.7 xi t, 04r461� Analysis Period (-yin) " 15 2011 DHV Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 4 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 9: Airport Drive & Airport Circle Entrance 3/30/2009 Ta4�F'- �irFi. =;F'R 7�!ikcj�" --��. t _;:kiwi w;�,.- �•�;4,- _ �A�i: - ^is,.y,:. a='�=r - - - - � is.,.:-' � �'4�;:. :: vim,-'i{ . J � cx.-' `l'�: b•, .JJw- -': }:� i� � .='(T - G .-Lcy`�-� �=F . ;F'�?'a . ..,i ri" ^:..V+-'_....�. �I.. I., F�M„Sfl�i�,�i.'r,.4:� J..�' '�w�Y,,;; ,3�:F�1. _ ��'-�• _wi�• �1��'i; �.i;rr 3..=4�..i �a��}�-:r _i._'. �� n'. :. . .. .. ..�_ ._,: �uF2 ,.�-.-, mow=Rau..-.ise..:• 5:� � ; X .� �_..,.�. :- u� . a,. Lane Configurations + r ►j t Uo e; ve I53 Sign Control Free Free Stop - Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fj1' 1{�Ir1�,:a11(�}fJ-Q{ �lr .' �: �1 1. -U {�,:1- _ F {' '"%fn-V'tr•' !ne_!i!: �''' Fi•F.nl %� t'F'.Ri!'i:,Y':rl.. 4 9.1'il j.;,_:' �� - �. �ik.;li$tiL•i:1i-'::xl:q" _ _ _ �::',w�."�;•. I14F�F� -,i.'xt in hC:'.an" .- � -- - ' . J •.111-,'.3ra+_,-. Pedestrians ., , .t .. � ... _ - Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) I-�..., euiFaE^' - - i_wl�.. r_-r..•' ter.:: - - ,,. _ - -1 �CY ' t:iltCl 1. iC lti. 2 NC ! r L .>.rs�ritt:��_`:y -I1Dr1 Median storage veh) pX, plato1jo+!n unblocked 7_ 4411) vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 787 1400 653 tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % 89_ .- liiutne�ptal!''`' Volume Left 0 0 94 0 Yi3ile;,i i •s,°;' ':; .;�''_e�i%�'1!�±.�..;e:�;:�Fi' .. - •• - _ cSH 1700 1700 " ..832 , 1700 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 10 0 8ki Lane LOS A �'/�,'i _ [',1•�h+�Ri. ":d�'c,y':.'liii ;FSn'z•{ �.�r•.a;,;t':i•/.�rc:,.._ru :lei:;- 3irm'r;;. . i k.,'.�!.l"l'S �in•$!�: V''W GI. : ,5, 1 s.�lT�te'-ell , [.E`L:ill�i�i W.:: aF.r ::� .t {vntr:,i r6iT' ;2:i.::Yn '�y".=:•.�i}'I�. r�la..f:..r-n...rii..:.1e.[lr-n.•!_. .k......... .....:�C:�-�...:I F...i'L�^.. Approach LOS .pf•`•.,rT,.' "fir �t�,�,y��•.���Ivr� ?li �/St%� ���,4�n�/i:;-n�,� � t�<Cr;'''.11Y%ti�;.i�.••rl�r"A'C.�eYv�.x�W�S:..�{.�".'.�.t Y`x^,'&'�".,•�! � i fj',�#~I+�u 7i.:�"/.....:,':�;o.^.�Yt•.-'.I"�_•a� .CnT �! � �'�" p S `:L-.J.'W�µr�� Average Delay 0.6 hy,wy -. L`rrh( 'f:..�,[—tt:::�.,jt� (sect Gapa i l: I L?.. I✓ "`;r< . , ^ , i.: -.,, i Analysis Period (min) 15 2016 No Build Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 4 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 9: Airport Drive & Airport Circle Entrance 3/30/2009 t r 14► 1( tv Lane Configurations Sign Control Free Free Stop W 4 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 D Pedestrians Walking Speed (ftts) Right turn flare (veh) W-A IN0,11,11 Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked vC1, stage I conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 818 1496 65' 3 tC, 2 stage (s) P, K .;.. , .,' " , !t 2 is x A 'a PO queue free % 86 100 100 flIff 91 F' Wfiti NO' W Volume Left 0 0 116 0 cSH 1700 1700 810 1700 & - eg Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 12 0 1 0 M N 0•11, 1,10, .1 N 1"I Lane LOS B -16 m Approach LOS Average Delay 0.8 Analysis Period (min) 15 2016 Design Hour Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 4 EMPLOYEE LOT Airport Drive at Airport Employee Parkin South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traftfite¢ tu4irport Drive at Employee Parking Entrance AM Site Code 11202008 Start Date : 11/20/2008 Page No 1 Groups Printed- autos Airport Drive From North Airport Employee Parking Entrance From East Airport Drive From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App" Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 I-OT 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 06:30 AM 06:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Total 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 01 6 07-00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 07.15 AM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 07:30 AM 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 7 07:45 AM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 15 08.00 AM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 08.15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08.30 AM 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 08,45 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 _ 0 3 _ Total 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 10 09:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 09:15 AM 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 Grand Total 0 0 24 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 38 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 63.2 0.0 63.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Airport Drive Airport Employee Parking Entrance Airport Drive From North From East From South From West _ Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Total Total Total veaK Hour From Ub:3U AM t0 U9:1b AM - YeaK 1 or 1 Intersection 06.45 AM Volume 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 07:30 Volume 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0' Peak Factor High Int. 06-45 AM 6:15:00 AM 07:30 AM 6:15:00 AM Volume 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 Peak Factor 0.500 0.438 Int. Total 17 7 0.607 Airport Drive at Airport Employee Parkin South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffifl a *u4irport Drive at Employee Parking Entrance -AM Site Code : 11202008 Start Date : 11 /20/2008 Page No ° 1 Grnunc Printeri- haavv vPhidF-.q Airport Drive From North Airport Employee Parking Entrance From East Airport Drive From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Totai Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Factor 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 .1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 06:30 AM 06:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 07.00 AM 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 07-30 AM 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 09.00 AM 0 0 0 0 09.15 AM 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Airport Drive Airport Employee Parking Entrance Airport Drive From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total I Total Total Total reaK hour rrom ul7:.5U AM 10 UWI p AM - reaK 'l Or l Intersection 06:30 AM Volume 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 07 15 Volume 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int. 6-15,00 AM Volume Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 6:15:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 6:15:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 6:15:00 AM Airport Drive at Airport Employee Parkin South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Trafl`i&1teO&*%tu4irport Drive at Employee Parking Entrance -AM Site Code 11202008 Start Date 11/20/2008 Page No ; 1 r]munc 13A.f rl_ Quin. - h..- -hi,ic Airport Drive From North Airport Employee Parking Entrance From East Airport Drive From South From West Start Time _ Right �PedsLeft App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total I Total _ Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 1-01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.0 06.30 AM 06'45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Total 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 07-15 AM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 07:30 AM 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 7 07.45 AM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 15 08:00 AM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:30 AM 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 08.45 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 Total 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 10 09.00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 09:15 AM 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 Grand Total 0 0 24 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 38 Apprch % 00 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 63.2 0.0 63.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Airport Drive Airport Employee Parking Entrance Airport Drive From North From East From South From West _ Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App" Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int'I Total Peak Flour From Ub:JU AM to Uy:15 AM - reaK 1 07 1 Intersection 06,45 AM Volume 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 07,30 Volume 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int. 06:45 AM 6:15:00 AM Volume 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor 0.500 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 6:15:00 AM 0 4 0 0 0 4 0.438 0 17 0 7 0.607 Airport Drive at Employee Parking Entran South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic 1M8tedyairport drive at employee parking entrance_pm Site Code ° 11192008 Start Date 11/19/2008 Page No 1 ('rry inn PrintPrl- ni dnc Airport Drive From North Airport Employee Parking Entranc From East Airport Drive From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds APP' Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right TI1ru Left Peds App. Total Right 1 Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Factor 1.01 _ 1.01 1.01 1,01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 03:30 PM 03.45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 01 2 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06.15 PM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Grand Total 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Airport Drive Airport Employee Parking Entranc Airport Drive From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left PedsP� Right Thru Left Peds App Right Thru Left Peds Toptpa� Right Thru Left Peds Total Total Total Neale Hour Prom 03:30 HIM to Uti:15 NM - Peak 1 Ot 1 Intersection 03:30 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 03:45 Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Peak Factor High Int. 3:15:00 PM 3:15:00 PM 03:30 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Peak Factor 0.500 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 3:15:00 PM 2 1 0.500 Airport Drive at Employee Parking Entrain South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic IftbStedyairport drive at employee parking entrance -pm Site Code : 11192008 Start Date ° 11/19/2008 Page No : 1 rZr" inc PrinraA- hoovv vahinloa Airport Drive Airport Employee Parking Entranc Airport Drive From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds App. Int Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01.0 1.0 1.0 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04.15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04.45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0• 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05.00 PM 0 0 0 0 05.15 PM 0 0 0 0 05.30 PM 0 0 0 0 05.45 PM 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 Apprch % 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Airport Drive Airport Employee Parking Entranc Airport Drive From North From East From South From West _ Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Tlttu Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Total Total Total teak moor t-rom U3:3U vm to U6:1b Fm - reaK 1 Or 1 Intersection 03:30 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 0 Percent 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 04:15 Volume 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int. 3:15:00 PM Volume Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 3:15:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 3:15:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:15:00 PM Int. Total 0 0 0.000 Airport Drive at Employee Parking Entran South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic lMpdVb8tadyairport drive at employee parking entrance -pm Site Code : 11192008 Start Date _ 11 /19/2008 Page No 1 r.rnnnt Printorl- nutne . hcnvu vnhit lx Airport Drive From North Airport Employee Parking Entrant; From East Airport Drive From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds�Ap Right Thru Left Peds Total Right Thru Left Peds TotalRight Thru Left Peds Aptalctor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.011 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.D 03:30 PM _ 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 1 1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 01 2 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04.30 PM 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Total 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05.00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:15 PM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Grand Total 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 60-0 0.0 60.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 Airport Drive Airport Employee Parking Entrant; From North From East Airport Drive From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Total Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App- Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. _Total I'eaK dour From u6:6v F m to U6.ib em - veaK 1 Or 1 Intersection 03:30 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 03:45 Volume 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int. 3:15:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3:15:00 PM 03:30 PM 3:15:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.500 0 2 0 1 0.500 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 8: Airport Employee Parking Lot Entrance & Airport Drive 3/30/2009 ivi, i Lane Configurations 4' 24 Sign Control Stop Free Free 90/0 -: I - I " 19/. -1Y Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 245 Pedestrians La Walking Speed fts) Right turn flare (veh) e, Median storage veh PX, platoon unblocked 40 ENO U vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 751 247 249 PAO', AN 0v� Mw —9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5 pO queue free % 100 100 100 1, RNi IN I MR E W 49-- Volume Left 0, 5 cSH 1700 1299 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 ON, Lane LOS A Approach LOS Average Delay 0.1 .17 S0406 % A' Analysis Period (min) 15 2009 Design Hour Volumes Morning Peak Hour HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 3 Burlington International Airport Traffic Study Stantec 8: Airport Employee Parking Lot entrance & Airport Drive 3131/2009 'K Lane Configurations "Af Sign Control Stop ree Free Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . .. . ... . ....... . .... Pedestrians e Walking Speed (tys) PANNA 04664.1-t�'1, Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) U pX, platoon unblocked 4 wnfl".— ... ............. . .... : �-; N N., ORP vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC .ttage 2 Gpltf y6f vCu, unblocked vol 1126 561 U tkA 4 tC, 2 stage (s) 91011, j.5 pO queue free % 100 100 100 i2 7, 226 PROW'Oty...-N, NOE!, Volume Total 561 564 Volume Left 0 1 VU.Ip cSH 1700 1015 V 'Ity Queue Length 95 ' th ft) 0 0 r o etaLane LOS A , P 09d 0 - . -' _' - I _ OL: t , - Approach LOS J Average Delay 0.0 ' e r'9" cfl "C a - P Analysis Period (min) 15 2009 Design Hour Volumes HCM Unsig,, ilized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 3 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 8: Airport Employee Parking Lot Entrance & Airport Drive 3/31/2009 Lane Configurations Hof M Sign Control Stop Free Free N Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 , Pedestrians n&. Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (Velh) 01 z Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked' 1@2 Ell - vC1, stage 1 conf vol " " '" vCu, unblocked vol 1129 567 567 tC, 2 stage (s) V 3 pO queue free % 1-66 icio 100 OR% Vila ff Volume Left 0 1- ANN cSH 1700 1010 SOK,10 Wity, N&S q Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 iW 0 y 11"L�Lkj%','.:.s r 0 Lane LOS A -2-P Y1 i!!; Approach LOS Average Delay 0.0 uF asq-t ap 3� 7R M Analysis Period (min) 15 2011 No Build Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 3 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 8: Airport Employee Parking Lot Entrance & Airport Drive 3/31/2009 I f' IL- t r' 1* .S•�'•'-"��'.�,..,; �^"�"�kc^�Y;7,::; y.[s C:. - - - ^"t '...F :�' =uS.�,r x. ,'3i. La tiy��•i .�.�6--.;.f'- � ^"kC:� j;•_ �.-.�V_ A i �EI — c r u `'� '.:���{��.j �"' � •�`;.r,^` ,,,�,�r F�Tr e 'r �i. 't�+ � �. :r�._';j�ti4 W��1�7'T�'�3��` a fit"C"�i�3F K.' �"� "T�r.`- �Y.^-i•Mi?�� ,+c.+iTt" 4 '� ✓f'jY� ni'S h Lane Configurations t Sign Control Stop Free Free Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pedestrians wa" 19 Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) .5, _ :.1,`,.•,a. tT : i.. _ _ , - -,. IQL: G••.�•_• •'�1� - , _ . - n_5f�f...._t.... ••..IS,:' , . �.T'•"w'' :t..s_.. ,r— veh) Median storage _ Upsreiitrl`signa pX, platoon unblocked PCs=c.�tkllic - ;vo to � 1� � ��7i(� -. _ G7���_- _ ....: _ . -, • .. ... . . : .. vC1, stage 1 conf vol . : . .. . . vCu, unblocked vol 1155 567 567 }�± n. tC, 2 stage (s) V-, tit'; p0 queue free % 100 100 100 '` 07 Volume Left 0 1 cSH 1700 1010 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 Lane LOS A 004 Approach LOS tit �m �„ }^;�u '1_:•�iY:^�l` -�'j i:.L S �,.r!.v�C I ��� � _ V x;� �.r'±�;s `.;�=y ��:=:"�`�rM7u'.. _ .�i .,_ „�`u'�� ... ��s ,tea^- M.�x:�{� bmr».-, "3-''��-,. .rux; :., .•i,,� QYpn 7� �I ^ YGr=4 - �G:..,- `'D�„M "U✓er+.r �L'�'; �:,ewr">i 1:3}��R��W����ue<•�+�^<-��.rr�F.�?L��F-`.w''�-'�a:�nZ1�"F�+;x" - F'K�i7 �kt'�k�3�;, �:r��[3?e.,- a�,- :F,Ci::E:;t'�'�a�_,����•,r�`'``�+"�_1`e^.'�.`'�',: Average Delay 0.0 - =- M_ to sec'`o'. aci •fitii:' - - ti ;=1 : Analysis Period (min) 15 2011 DHV Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 3 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 8: Airport Employee Parking Lot Entrance & Airport Drive 3/30/2009 f- "l- t t,* lom Lane Configurations .V 0: 2 i-575 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grail "k- Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/S) Right turn flare (veh) g Median storage veh) Pos 1" k'P 13 pX, platoon unblocked 1113�0411 lhgAh 0— 4 vC1, stage I conf vol -'11. --'ran, 0 vCu, unblocked vol 1159 582 582 tC, 2 stage (s) .64 pO queue free % 100 100 100 Vp 4.wl-:Pt� Volume Left 0 1 .0- cSH 1700 997 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 C elk Lane LOS A Approach LOS Average Delay 0.0 Enters'eC9 P44 Q0 Analysis Period (min) 15 U 2016 No Build Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 3 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 8: Airport Employee Parking Lot Entrance & Airport Drive 3/30/2009 I rlt z,w '. - •ir='-•' ' kth icier x;3'�="" . 'b'5�'_i'. �.,c :5f 3=„.''p .:'£✓�� : '','i $';e r sue•! �_;s5: „'•` s°�_•'o"pi5 ire' � �.rni�'ar � ���`1zt't-- ;u'�CT� w � � rt^-*� ,e, x� �„�x•"'y'��,' <-e,,}•e._.. , �`�C .� aii'�3 -!d ...?�...v,.c+,?�� Lane Configurations Oaf: Sign Control Stop- Free Free Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 tJ_ k P �_ W.—.....,:,.�,i..r 1ili- 0- me;�:w� 3-'-,¢,�v gimp_, .'.; fj-c,�i:;,_1 ORI- .Ni...fs . _:;:L• �y; Pedestrians ,' ,:-.'."..: •.� . _. ,: ... ;. . Walking Speed (ft/s)..: Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) X, platoon unblocked _x:eohflr� n vpf • e ,.: .....::% �; 5&�.� ., ��-<,: -M vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1233 582 58217 n � :2 tC, 2 stage (s) 5'zi,- - p0 queue free % 100 100 100 q Volume Left 0 1 11" cSH 1700 997 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 Lane LOS A ��L!��'_��,IR�i�k�.+4'-' _ � i�i�`- z��';•.1.Lk?IJ%isiti; - ,, :, �, � - _ Approach LOS _ ,"- .. ._ :. Average Delay 0.0 '}�u. N'-c:: •",1 - -......... i'4- _ .•e3 _�:� _-<D Ira#e es on G' 'a ' 3it7bn:,::. yM� Ir� `"�..: r.�.. _ MU- -- - - - •:u:c^Rf�,.��,.; - _ yL�. r_,- i. _-e ...... ....... .,..-.1-!�._.... .—,i,,j�-";'.r`-`"•;4Y,, e!?()��::__.:.'^h_�:��=•4. 1:,:,:'1 -1 :.:.1: !il •�.::.�1i�1:: 4.n.,� -_. _ Analysis Period (min) 15 riFi:fi + - r�dFy« e 2016 Design Hour Volumes HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 3 AIRPORT EXIT f f z x w L 0 0- o X N - 16 %I AIRPORT DRIVE Z.o Z.0 %I w w cr V) — 0 z a J Q NOT TO SCALE .2 South Bunmgl°n v-t EXISTING CONDITION: INTERSECTION #4 S�C711tLC r5nd.ti�rt rafficStint¢ INTERSECTION OF AIRPORT EXIT/ C°0wding SatlW Inc 195310247 3/10/2009 MARYLAND STREET/AND AIRPORT DRIVE .°:... ° "" ""°`°""°_"°"°' CRASH RATE WORKSHEET CITY/TOWN South Burlington COUNT DATE . 11/19/2008 UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED, — INTERSECTION DATA — MAJOR STREET Airport Drive MINOR STREET(S) Airport Circle (airport exit) Maryland Street COLLISION DIAGRAM (Label Approaches) 1 Airport Drive ISouthbound North c J a CD N o [p N n Z Lu CD x n m � a�(D � 1 Airport Drive Northbound Peak Hour Volumes APPROACH 1 2 3 4 5 Total Crash Record When Accident r. Injuries Notes: Number (Date/Time) Type i 0414/3761-05 2/28/05, 12:40 angle property damage only clear South Burlington Vermontl I t:P Stantec Consulting Services Inc. /55 Green Mountain Drive. Airport Drive at �South Burlington, VT U.S.A. Burlington International Airport 05403 Traffic Study Airport Exit/Maryland StreetTel. 802.864.0223 Stantec Fax.802.864.0165 195310247 3/17/20091 1 www.stantec.com Airport Drive at Airport Exit/Maryland S South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Stugge Name : Airport Drive at Maryland Street -AM Site Code : 11202008 Start Date ° 11/20/2008 Page No ° 1 r,rni me PrintPrl_ ai dns Airport Drive Airport Exit Airport Drive Maryland Street From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds APp' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Int. Total Total Total Total Total L Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.13 1.0 1.0 1.0 06 30 AM 0 34 0 0 34 7 0 7 0 14 0 22 0 0 22 1 0 0 0 1 71 06:45 AM 0 46 0 0 461 4 0 4 0 81 0 28 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 82 Total 0 80 0 0 801 11 0 11 0 221 0 50 0 0 50 1 0 0 0 1 153 07:00 AM 0 53 0 0 53 2 0 8 0 10 0 31 1 0 32 2 0 0 0 2 97 07:15 AM 0 63 0 0 63 12 0 10 0 22 1 39 0 0 40 2 0 0 0 2 127 07:30 AM 0 90 0 0 90 7 0 9 0 16 0 42 0 0 42 1 0 0 0 1 149 07:45 AM 1 97 0 0 98 6 0 5 0 11 1 70 1 0 72 1 0 0 0 1 182 Total 1 303 0 0 304 27 0 32 0 59 2 182 2 0 186 6 0 0 0 6 555 08:00 AM 0 82 0 0 82 9 0 6 0 15 0 39 1 0 40 0 0 1 0 08:15 AM 0 82 0 0 82 6 0 15 0 21 0 38 0 0 38 1 0 0 0 08-30 AM 0 81 0 0 81 8 0 14 0 22 0 37 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 08:45 AM 0 70 0_ 0 70 4 0 8 0 12 0 36 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 Total 0 315 0 0 315 27 0 43 0 70 0 150 1 0 151 1 0 1 0 09.00 AM 0 52 0 0 52 13 1 15 0 29 0 28 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 09.15 AM 0 68 0 0 68 14 0 13 0 27 0 44 2 0 46 1 0 0 0 Grand Total 1 818 0 0 819 92 1 114 0 207 2 454 5 0 461 9 0 1 0 Apprch % 0.1 99.9 0.0 0.0 44.4 0.5 55.1 0.0 0.4 98.5 1.1 0.0 90.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 Total % 0.1 54.6 0.0 0,0 54.7 6.1 0.1 7.6 0.0 13.8 0.1 30.3 0.3 0.0 30.8 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 1 138 1 142 0 140 0 109 1 142 10 1497 0.7 Airport Drive Airport Exit Airport Drive Maryland Street From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App Total Right Thru Left Peds Total Total F'eaK Hour t-rom Uti::% AM 10 U9:15 AM - F'eaK 1 01 1 Intersection 07.30 AM Volume 1 351 0 0 352 Percent 0.3 99.7 0.0 0.0 07:45 Volume 1 97 0 0 98 Peak Factor High Int 07.45 AM Volume 1 97 0 0 98 Peak Factor 0.898 28 0 35 0 63 44.4 0.0 65.6 0.0 6 0 5 0 11 08:15 AM 6 0 15 0 21 0.750 1 189 2 0 192', 0.5 984 1.0 0.0 1 70 1 0 72 07:45 AM 1 70 1 0 72 0.667 3 0 1 0 4 75.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 1 0 0 0 1 07:30 AM 1 0 0 0 1 1.000 611 182 0.839 Airport Drive at Airport Exit/Maryland S South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact StufFige Name : Airport Drive at Maryland Street AM Site Code : 11202008 Start Date 11 /20/2008 Page No 1 r]rnnnc Prinfad-hnavv vrahiplac Airport Drive Airport Exit Airport Drive Maryland Street From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Total Total Total t Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 06:30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 06.45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 Total 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 6 07.00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 07:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 07:45 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total 0 4 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 2 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 13 08.00 AM 0 6 0 0 6 1 0 1 0 2 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 13 08-15 AM 1 5 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 08:30 AM 0 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 9 08'45 AM 0 4 0 0 4 1 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total 1 18 0 0 19 4 0 3 0 7 0 14 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 40 09:00 AM 0 5 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 10 09.15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 Grand Total 1 29 0 0 30 8 0 3 0 11 0 33 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 74 Apprch % 3.3 96.7 0.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 27.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 1.4 39.2 0.0 0.0 40.5 10.8 0.0 4.1 0.0 14.9 0.0 4.4.6 0.0 0.0 44.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Airport Drive Airport Exit Airport Drive Maryland Street From North From East From South From West _ Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds App. Int. Total Total Total Total Totai Peak Hour From 06:30 AM to 09:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 08:00 AM Volume 1 18 0 0 19 4 0 3 0 7 0 14 0 0 14 Percent 53 94.7 0.0 0.0 57.1 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 08:00 Volume 0 6 0 0 6 1 0 1 0 2 0 5 0 0 5 Peak Factor High Int 08:00 AM 08:45 AM 08:00 AM Volume 0 6 0 0 6 1 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 0 5 Peak Factor 0.792 0.583 0.700 0 0 0 0 0 40 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.769 6:15:00 AM Airport Drive at Airport Exit/Maryland S South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Stuffqe Name : Airport Drive at Maryland Street AM Site Code 11202008 Start Date : 11/20/2008 Page No 1 r-'-no Prin#or#_ �i#nc _ hmw vnhirine r Airport Drive Airport Exit Airport Drive Maryland Street _ From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Int. Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 06.30 AM 0 35 0 0 35 8 0 7 0 15 0 23 0 0 23 1 0 0 0 1 74 06:45 AM 0 46 0 0 46 4 0 4 0 8 0 31 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 85 Total 0 81 0 0 81 12 0 11 0 23 0 54 0 0 54 1 0 0 0 1 159 07:00 AM 0 54 0 0 54 3 0 8 0 11 0 36 1 0 37 2 0 0 0 2 104 07:15 AM 0 64 0 0 64 12 0 10 0 22 1 41 0 0 42 2 0 0 0 2 130 07:30 AM 0 90 0 0 90 8 0 9 0 17 0 42 0 0 42 1 0 0 0 1 150 07:45 AM 1 99 0 0 100 6 0 5 0 11 1 70 1 0 72 1 0 0 0 1 184 Total 1 307 0 0 308 29 0 32 0 61 2 189 2 0 193 6 0 0 0 6 568 08:00 AM 0 88 0 0 88 10 0 7 0 17 0 44 1 0 45 0 0 1 0 08:15 AM 1 87 0 0 88 6 0 15 0 21 0 41 0 0 41 1 0 0 0 08:30 AM 0 84 0 0 84 10 0 14 0 24 0 41 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 08:45 AM 0 74 0 0 74 5 0 10 0 15 0 38 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 _ Total 1 333 0 0 334 31 0 46 0 77 0 164 1 0 165 1 0 1 0 09:00 AM 0 57 0 0 57 14 1 15 0 30 0 32 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 09:15 AM 0 69 0 0 69 14 0 13 0 27 0 48 2 0 50 1 0 0 0 Grand Total 2 847 0 0 849 100 1 117 0 218 2 487 5 0 494 9 0 1 0 Apprch % 0.2 998 0.0 0.0 45.9 0.5 53.7 0.0 0.4 98.6 1.0 0.0 90.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 Total % 0.1 53.9 0.0 0.0 54.0 6.4 0.1 7A 0.0 13.9 0.1 31.0 0.3 0.0 31.4 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 1 151 1 151 0 149 0 127 21 578 0 I 119 1 f 147 10 1571 0.6 Airport Drive Airport Exit Airport Drive Maryland Street From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App Total Total Total Total reaK NOUr 1-rOm UO:JV AM [O u`J: 10 AM - reaK 10# I Intersection 07:30 AM Volume 2 364 0 0 366 Percent 0.5 99.5 0.0 0.0 07:45 Volume 1 99 0 0 100 Peak Factor High Int. 07:45 AM Volume 1 99 0 0 100 Peak Factor 0.915 30 0 36 0 66 1 197 2 0 200 45.5 0.0 54.5 0.0 0.5 98.5 1.0 0.0 6 0 5 0 11 1 70 1 0 72 08:15 AM 07:45 AM 6 0 15 0 21 1 70 1 0 72 0.786 0.694 3 0 1 0 4 75.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 1 0 0 0 1 07:30 AM 1 0 0 0 1 1.000 Int. Total 636 184 0.864 Airport Drive at Airport Exit/Maryland S South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Stuffye Name : Airport Drive at Maryland Street -PM Site Code : 11192008 Start Date : 11 /19/2008 Page No 1 C]rnunc Prin4ai_ �n4ne Airport Drive From North Airport Exit From East Airport Drive From South Maryland Street From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peels App.�Ri�ghlTl Total Left Peels App'Right Total Thru Left Peels App'gLeft Total peels App. Total Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1-01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 03:30 PM 0 89 0 0 89 03:45 PM 0 67 0 0 67 12 0 31 0 43 11 0 32 0 43 0 78 0 0 78 0 73 0 0 73 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 211 183 _ Total 0 156 0 0 1561 23 0 63 0 86 0 151 0 0 151 1 0 0 0 1 11 394 04.00 PM 0 78 0 0 78 22 0 54 0 76 0 88 1 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 243 04.15 PM 0 75 0 0 75 11 0 45 0 56 0 92 1 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 224 04:30 PM 0 65 1 0 66 12 0 49 0 61 0 155 0 0 155 1 0 0 0 1 283 04.45 PM 0 75 0 0 75 13 0 50 0 63 0 71 1 0 72 0 0 1 0 1 211 Total 0 2 33 1 0 294 58 0 198 0 256 0 406 3 0 409 1 0 1 0 2 961 05.00 PM 1 72 0 0 73 24 0 48 0 72 0 '135 4 0 139 2 0 0 0 2 286 05:15 PM 0 66 0 0 66 18 0 23 0 41 0 83 2 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 192 05:30 PM 0 34 0 0 34 12 0 37 0 49 0 58 0 0 58 0 0 1 0 1 142 05:45 PM 1 36 0 0 37 11 0 19 0 30 0 44 3 0 47 1 0 0 0 1 115 _ Total 2 208 0 0 210 65 0 127 0 192 0 320 9 0 329 3 0 1 0 4 735 06:00 PM 0 33 0 0 33 17 0 26 0 43 0 48 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 124 06:15 PM 0 36 2 0 38 11 0 15 0 26 0 39 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 103 Grand Total 2 726 3 0 731 174 0 429 0 603 0 964 12 0 976 5 0 2 0 7 2317 Apprch % 0.3 99.3 0.4 0.0 28.9 0.0 71.1 0.0 0.0 98.8 1.2 0.0 71.4 0.0 28.6 0.0 Total % 0.1 31.3 0.1 0.0 31.5 7.5 0.0 18.5 0.0 26.0 0.0 41.6 0.5 0.0 42.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 Airport Drive Airport Exit Airport Drive Maryland Street From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peels App' Right Thru Left Peels App. Right Thru Left Peels App. Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Total Total Total reaK Flour From u3:6u F'M to Ub:1 t) rM - reaK l Or 1 Intersection 04:15 PM Volume 1 287 1 0 289 Percent 0.3 99.3 0.3 0.0 05.00 Volume 1 72 0 0 73 Peak Factor High Int. 04:15 PM Volume 0 75 0 0 75 Peak Factor 0.963 60 0 192 0 252 23.8 0.0 76.2 0.0 24 0 48 0 72 05:00 PM 24 0 48 0 72 0.875 0 453 6 0 459' 0.0 98.7 1.3 0.0 0 135 4 0 139 04:30 PM 0 155 0 0 155 0.740 3 0 1 0 4 75.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 2 0 0 0 2 05:00 PM 2 0 0 0 2 0.500 Int. Total 1004 286 0.878 Airport Drive at Airport Exit/Maryland S South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Stuff9e Name : Airport Drive at Maryland Street -PM Site Code 11192008 Start Date - 11 /19/2008 Page No ° 1 lSrni inc Prin+cri_ F.00.nr voF.inln� Airport Drive From North -App. Airport Exit From East Airport Drive From South Maryland Street From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Pads App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 1 1.01 1.0 03:30 PM 03-45 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 Total 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 01 5 04.00 PM 04:15PM 04.30 PM 04.45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 4 5 Total 0 3 0 0 3 0 6 0 0 6 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 17 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 _ Total 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 Grand Total 0 7 0 0 7 0 10 0 0 10 0 11 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 28 Apprch % 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 35.7 0.0 0.0 35.7 0.0 39.3 0.0 0 0 39.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �J Airport Drive Airport Exit Airport Drive Maryland Street From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total HeaK Flour t-rom uj:3U NM r0 ub:15 Hm - reaK 1 of 1 Intersection 04:00 PM Volume 0 3 0 0 3 0 6 0 0 6 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 17 Percent 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 00 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 04.45 Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Peak Factor 0.850 High Int 04:00 PM 04:45 PM 04:15 PM 3:15:00 PM Volume 0 1 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 3 Peak Factor 0.750 0.300 0.667 Airport Drive at Airport Exit/Maryland S South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Stugge Name : Airport Drive at Maryland Street -PM Site Code = 11/92008 Start Date = 11 /19/2008 Page No ; 1 r:rnunc PnnfPri_ anfnc _ hnaw vahirJae Airport Drive Airport Exit Airport Drive Maryland Street From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds 'gyp Int. Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 _ 03 30 PM 0 89 0 0 _ 89 12 0 31 0 43 0 79 0 0 79 1 0 0 0 1 212 0145 PM 0 69 0 0 691 11 1 32 0 44 0 74 0 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 187 Total 0 158 0 0 1581 23 1 63 0 87 0 •153 0 0 153 . 1 0 0 0 1 1 399 04:00 PM 0 79 0 0 79 22 0 54 0 76 0 90 1 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 246 04:15 PM 0 76 0 0 76 11 1 45 0 57 0 95 1 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 229 04:30 PM 0 66 1 0 67 12 0 49 0 61 0 158 0 0 158 1 0 0 0 1 287 04:45 PM _ 0 75 0 0 75 13 5 50 0 68 0 71 1 0 72 0 0 1 0 1 215 Total 0 296 1 0 297 58 6 198 0 262 0 414 3 0 417 1 0 1 0 2 978 05:00 PM 1 72 0 0 73 24 0 48 0 72 0 135 4 0 139 2 0 0 0 2 286 05:15 PM 0 66 0 0 66 18 1 23 0 42 0 83 2 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 193 05:30 PM 0 35 0 0 35 12 0 37 0 49 0 58 0 0 58 0 0 1 0 1 143 _ 05:45 PM 1 36 0 0 37 11 1 19 0 31 0 44 3 0 47 1 0 0 0 1 116 Total 2 209 0 0 211 65 2 127 0 194 0 320 9 0 329 3 0 1 0 4 738 06:00 PM 0 33 0 0 33 17 0 26 0 43 0 48 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 124 06.15 PM 0 37 2 0 39 11 1 15 0 27 0 40 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 106 Grand Total 2 733 3 0 738 174 10 429 0 613 0 975 12 0 987 5 0 2 0 7 2345 Apprch % 0.3 99.3 0.4 0.0 28.4 1.6 70.0 0.0 0.0 98.8 1.2 0.0 71.4 0.0 28.6 0.0 Total % 0.1 31.3 0.1 0.0 31.5 7.4 0.4 18.3 0.0 26.1 0.0 41.6 0.5 0.0 42.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 Airport Drive Airport Exit Airport Drive Maryland Street From North From East From South From West _ Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App" Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Right Thru Left Peds App. Int. I Total Total Total Total Total PeaK Hour vrom uj:ju PM to uu:lb PM - HeaK 1 Or 'I Intersection 04:15 PM Volume 1 289 1 0 291 Percent 0.3 993 0.3 0.0 04:30 Volume 0 66 1 0 67 Peak Factor High Int. 04:15 PM Volume 0 76 0 0 76 Peak Factor 0.957 60 6 192 0 258 23.3 2.3 74.4 0.0 12 0 49 0 61' 05:00 PM 24 0 48 0 72 0.896 0 459 6 0 465 0.0 98.7 1.3 0.0 0 158 0 0 158 04:30 PM 0 158 0 0 158 0.736 3 0 1 0 4 75.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 1 0 0 0 1 05:00 PM 2 0 0 0 2 0.500 1018 287 0.887 Airport Drive at Airport Exit South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Study File Name : Airport Drive at Airport Exit_060409 Site Code : 06032009 Start Date : 6/4/2009 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- all vehid_es_ _ _ ___-�- -.frje-t- Airport Drive Airport Exit Airport Drive Maryland Street I Start Time II Right I From North Thru I LeftPeds I _ _ I App. I Total l Right _ From East _ Thru I Left I Peds I_ _ I From South_ T.-_-_--_--. App. I Right I Thru Left I Peds Total I _- - - App I Right Total l I From West 1 - T Thru I Left I Peds I _ __ App Total Int 1 Total t _ _ Factor __ ; 1.0 _ _ .0 1.0 I 1 1 _ L - -I-_1 _ _I __ 0 I 1.0 1 0 0 __ 1 1.0 , _ 1__0 i T 1.0 -_-1.0 _ ;-1.0 i1'0 10-00 AM _ 0 _1 61 0 _1.0 O 61 ; 15 __1.0 27 0 _ _1 42 1 0 50� 0 0 _ 50� 0 0 0 0 0` 153 10.15 AM 0 63 0 0 631 12 0 23 0 35 0 44 0 0 44 I 0 0 0 0 01 142 10 30 AM 0 63 0 0 63' 21 0 23 0 441 0 51 0 0 51 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 159 10:4_5_AM 0 77 0 7I 12_ 0 71 I 0 4_600 j 1 0_ 0 1 _ 195 Total _ 0 _0 264 0 0 _ 2641 60 _0 _59_ _ 0 132 0 _ 192 r 0 191 0 __46 0 191 j 1 0 _0 _ 1 0 _ 2 l 649 Grand Total 0 264 0 0 264 � 60 0 132 0 1921 0 191 0 0 191 1 1 0 1 0 21 649 Apprch % 00 100.0 0.0 0.0 31.3 0.0 68.8 0.0 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 , Total % 0-0 40.7 0.0 0.0 1 40.7 j 92 0.0 20.3 0.0 29.61 00 294 0.0 0.0 I 29.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.31 Airport Drivej Airport Exit Airpt D orrive I 1 Maryland Street - i-- From North - ---- ---�-- _ F_rom_East -�---�--A- _ From South -�--- I From - -- West - -� - -- - - _ Start Time I T--- Right i Thru I Left • Peds, A- pp' j Total Right I Thru Left Peds I pp- I Right Thru Left C Total g j I �-----•- Peds j App' I Right I Total g i Thru Left Peds APP.i Tot Intl Totall I -- -- _- �- -1- -- -- --- - -� ---. --al --1 -1--� ---L---- ---= ---� - -� Peak Hour From 10:00 AM to 10:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 10:00 AM Volume 0 264 0 0 2641 60 0 132 0 1921 0 191 0 0 191 1 0 1 0 21 649 Percent 0.0 1000 0 0 0.0 1 31.3 0.0 68.8 0.0 j 0.0 100.0 0 0 0.0 ( 50.0 1 0 0 50.0 0.0 1 10 45 Volume 0 77 0 0 771 12 0 59 0 71 1 0 46 0 0 46 1 0 0 0 11 195 Peak Factor High Int. 10:45 AM 1 1 10 45 AM I 1 10.30 AM j i 10:30 AM i 0.832 Volume 0 77 0 0 771 12 0 59 0 71 0 51 0 0 51 1 0 ! 0 1 0 1 i Peak Factor 0.857 0.676 0.936 0.500 Airport Drive at Airport Exit South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic StuSoe Name : Airport Drive at Airport Exit_060409_PM Site Code : 06052009 Start Date : 6/4/2009 Page No : 1 Groups Printed all vehicles Airport Drive Airport Exit Airport Drive Maryland Street From North From East From South From West i Start Time - r Right I Thru Left Peds APP. Right I Thru Leftt- Peds App. , i Right - Total ; -- ApP. Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left I Peds ;Total _- _- -_ _TTotal- - - App. Total nt. Total i ! Factor 1 0 1 0 .0 1.0 1 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1_.0_ 1.0 - 1.0 1.0 =_ 03:Ob PM 1 83 _1 0 _ 0 84 --_L 19 _1.0 0 36 0 55 0 82 1 0 $3 0 0 0 0 0 222 03:15 PM 0 72 0 0 72 ' 12 0 27 0 39 0 65 0 0 65 3 0 0 0 3 179 03 30 PM 0 88 0 0 88' 16 0 36 0 52 0 76 1 0 77 i 1 0 1 0 2 219 03 45 PM 0 88 0 0 88 21 0 47 0 68.. 0 84 1 0 851 0 0 0 0 0 241 Total 1 331 0 0 332 68 0 146 0 214 ! 0 _ 307 3 0 310 4- 0 1 0 - 5' - 861 Grand Total 1 331 0 0 332 i 68 0 146 0 214 0 307 3 0 3101 4 0 1 0 51 861 Apprch % 03 99.7 00 0.0 31.8 0.0 682 0.0 0.0 I 99.0 1.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 Total % 0.1 384 00 0.0 38.6 ' 7.9 0.0 17.0 0.0 24.9 0.0 35.7 0.3 0.0 36.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 Airport Drive Airport Exit Airport Drive Maryland Street From North_ From East From South From West_ -- -- i Start Time - Right Thru ! Left Peds _ App" Total Right Thru �_� Left Peds __ Ap ght Total R _ Thru Left Peds --_��__ I _ APP Total Right I Thru T Left Peds ; -- App. Total Int. Total-] - Peak Hour From 03:00 PM to 03:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 _- __ Intersection 03 00 PM Volume 1 331 0 0 332 ` 68 0 146 0 214 0 307 3 0 310 4 0 1 0 5'� 861 Percent 0.3 99.7 0-0 0.0 31.8 0.0 68.2 0.0 0.0 99.0 1.0 0-0 80.0 0.0 20.0 00 03 45 Volume 0 88 0 0 88 21 0 47 0 68 0 84 1 0 85 ! 0 0 0 0 0 241 Peak Factor 0.893 High Int. 03,30 PM 03:45 PM 03:45 PM PM Volume 0 68 0 0 88 21 0 47 0 68 0 84 1 0 103:15 85 3 0 0 0 3 Peak Factor 0,9431 0.787 0.912 ; 0-417 Station ID: Sobr101 Location: BIA Exit Airport Dr. Town: South Burlington Weather: Sunny Counters: All Aggregate Chittenden County MPO 30 Kimball Ave. South Burlington, VT 05403 http://www.ccmpo.org/ File Name : sobr101_12hr count Site Code : 00000999 Start Date : 06/28/2005 Page No : 1 Airport Dr. SB BIA Exit Airport Dr NB Maryland St Fr N rth From Ea st Fr mS t From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds 'pp' Right Thru I Left Peds App Right Thru Left Peds App Right Thru Left Peds App_ Int Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0.1.1.0 1 1 0 1'0 1 1.0 1 0 1 1.0 1.0 10 1.0 1 0 1.01 1.0 07 00 AM 0 45 0 1 46 8 ' 0 11 0 19 0 25 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 90 07'15 AM 1 76 0 0 77 8 0 15 0 23 0 68 0 1 69 0 0 0 0 0 169 07-30 AM 0 83 0 3 86 6 0 33 0 39 0 51 0 0 51 2 0 0 0 2 178 45 AM 0 119 0 0 119 8 19 0 1 1 51 1 0 0 1 99 Total 1 323 0 4 328 30 0 78 0 108 0 193 1 2 196 3 0 0 1 41 636 08-00 AM 0 74 0 4 78 10 0 38 0 48 0 38 0 1 39 . 1 0 0 0 1 166 08 15 AM 0 102 0 0 102 6 0 39 0 45 0 44 0 0 44 1 0 0 1 2 193 08 30 AM 0 68 0 0 68 2 0 31 0 33 0 48 0 1 49 0 0 1 1 2 152 08 45 AM 0 70 0 0 70 6 0 25 0 31 0 45 0 0 45 1 0 0 0 1 147 Total 0 314 0 4 318 24 0 133 0 157 0 175 0 2 177 3 0 1 2 6 658 09 00 AM 1 53 0 0 54 8 0 41 0 49 0 39 1 0 40 2 0 0 1 3 146 09 15 AM 0 69 0 1 70 20 0 53 0 73 0 28 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 171 09.30 AM 0 54 0 0 54 21 0 50 0 71 0 45 2 2 49 0 0 0 0 0 174 09 45 AM 0 86 0 2 88 21 0 38 0 59 0 49 1 0 50 2 0 0 0 2 199 Total 1 262 0 3 266 70 0 182 0 252 0 161 4 2 167 4 0 0 1 5 690 10 00 AM 1 60 0 0 61 16 0 50 0 66 0 40 3 0 43 2 0 0 0 2 172 10 15 AM 0 63 0 0 63 19 0 42 0 61 0 41 0 0 41 1 0 1 0 2 167 10 30 AM 0 74 0 0 74 18 0 62 0 80 0 43 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 197 10 45 AM 0 72 0 1 73 19 0 65 0 0 66 1 0 0 0 1 226 Total 1 269 0 1 271 72 0 221 0 293 1 189 3 0 193 4 0 1 0 5 762 11 00 AM 0 57 0 1 58 23 0 84 0 107 0 72 2 0 74 2 0 0 0 2 241 11 15 AM 0 57 0 1 58 25 1 63 0 89 0 60 0 1 61 1 0 1 0 2 210 11 30 AM 0 68 0 1 69 13 0 49 0 62 1 62 1 2 66 0 0 0 0 0 197 11 45 1 84 0 0 85 16 3 69 0 88 0 69 2 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 244 Total 1 266 0 3 270 77 4 265 0 346 1 263 5 3 272 3 0 1 0 4 892 12 00 PM 0 61 1 0 62 10 0 46 0 56 0 54 0 0 54 1 0 0 0 1 173 12 15 PM 0 72 0 1 73 26 0 48 0 74 0 50 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 197 12 30 PM 0 75 0 0 75 22 0 62 0 84 0 63 0 1 64 2 0 0 0 2 225 12 45 PM 0 68 0 2 70 32 0 49 0 81 0 68 3 0 71 0 0 1 0 1 223 Total 0 276 1 3 280 90 0 205 0 295 0 235 3 1 239 3 0 1 0 4 818 01 00 PM 0 39 0 5 44 11 0 43 0 54 0 33 0 3 36 1 0 0 0 1 135 01 15 PM 0 66 0 0 66 18 0 46 0 64 0 46 0 3 49 0 0 0 0 0 179 01 30 PM 1 61 0 1 63 15 0 36 0 51 0 63 1 0 64 1 0 0 0 1 179 01 45 PM 0 63 0 2 65 20 0 70 0 90 0 60 2 4 66 3 0 0 0 3 224 Total 1 229 0 8 238 64 0 195 0 259 0 202 3 10 215 5 0 0 0 5 717 Station ID: Sobr101 Location: BIA Exit Airport Dr. Town: South Burlington Weather: Sunny Counters: All Aggregate Chittenden County MPO 30 Kimball Ave. South Burlington, VT 05403 http://www.ccmpo.org/ File Name : sobr101_12hr count Site Code : 00000999 Start Date : 06/28/2005 Page No :2 Airport Dr, SB BIA Exit Airport Dr NB Maryland St From rt From st From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App Total Int Total Factor 1 0 1 1.0 1- 1 0 1.0 1 1 1.0 1 01 1.01 1 0 1 1 0 02 00 PM 0 66 0 2 68 12 0 40 0 52 0 46 0 0 46 1 0 0 0 1 167 02,15 PM 1 64 0 1 66 16 0 32 0 48 0 61 2 1 64 0 0 0 0 0 178 02.30 PM 0 44 0 0 44 10 0 28 0 38 0 40 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 122 02 45 PM 0 58 0 0 58 9 0 29 0 38 0 46 0 0 46 1 0 0 0 1 143 Total 1 232 0 3 236 47 0 129 0 176 0 193 2 1 196 2 0 0 0 2 610 03 00 PM 0 69 0 0 69 12 0 33 0 45 0 59 0 0 59 1 0 0 0 1 174 03 15 PM 0 64 0 1 65 10 0 22 0 32 0 51 1 1 53 1 0 0 0 1 151 03 30 PM 0 67 0 0 67 12 0 67 0 79 1 75 0 0 76 1 0 0 0 1 223 03 45 PM 0 95 0 1 96 20 0 40 0 60 0 87 1 5 93 1 0 1 0 Total 0 295 0 2 297 54 0 162 0 216 1 272 2 6 281 4 0 1 0 5 799 04 00 PM 0 72 0 1 73 18 0 49 0 67 0 67 2 0 69 0 0 2 0 2 211 04:15 PM 1 79 0 0 80 25 0 37 1 63 0 69 2 1 72 1 0 0 0 1 216 04,30 PM 0 62 0 1 63 18 0 59 0 77 1 1 112 0 0 113 2 0 0 0 2 255 4 45 PM 0 90 0 0 90 31 0 94 0 125 0 38 0 1 139 1 0 0 0 1 355 Total 1 303 0 2 306 92 0 239 1 332 1 386 4 2 393 4 0 2 0 6 1037 05 00 PM 0 73 0 1 74 45 0 72 0 117 0 130 4 5 139 1 0 1 0 2 332 05 15 PM 0 74 0 6 80 26 0 44 0 70 0 81 2 1 84 4 0 0 0 4 238 05 30 PM 0 67 0 1 68 16 0 33 0 49 0 72 2 0 74 2 0 0 0 2 193 05:45 PM 0 65 0 1 66 15 0 51 0 66 0 69 2 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 203 Total 0 279 0 9 288 102 0 200 0 302 0 352 10 6 368 7 0 1 0 8 966 06 00 PM 0 51 0 1 52 12 0 34 0 46 0 70 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 168 06 15 PM 0 50 0 0 50 9 0 32 0 41 0 63 1 2 66 1 0 0 0 1 158 06 30 PM 0 39 0 2 41 18 0 54 0 72 0 24 2 0 26 2 0 0 0 2 141 06 45 PM 0 35 a 2 37 6 0 62 0 68 0 32 1 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 138 Total 0 175 0 5 180 45 0 182 0 227 0 189 4 2 195 3 0 0 0 3 605 Grand Total 7 3223 1 47 3278 I 767 4 2191 1 2963 4 2810 41 37 2892 I 459 0 8 4 57 9190 Apprch % 02 983 00 1 4 259 0.1 73.9 0.0 I 0.1 97.2 1.4 1.3 1 78. 0 0 14.0 TO Total % 0 1 35.1 00 0.5 35.7 1 8.3 00 23.8 0.0 322 0.0 30.6 04 0.4 31.5 0.5 00 0-1 0.0 0.6 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 3: Maryland Street & Airport Drive 3/30/2009 4\ t Lane Configurations +T T4. 2 52 -.2 2'"' -2 Sign Control stop Stop Free Free 00/9 to Peak Hour Factor 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 IRV HUI 2 52" 2 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ftls) . Right turn flare (veh) g Median storage veh) 1 pX, platoon unblocked 4 73 72,0= N 2�00 vC1, stage I conf Vol it , e vCu, unblocked Vol 730 690 444 692 691 242 445 242 W9 7-1 tC, 2 stage (s) 3.5,,, '4. .2 pO queue free % 100 100 100 85 100 95 100 100 .7k -46 Volume Left 1 52 0 2 0 2- ,Z cSH 474 357 797 1121 1700 11601,14, 10141 4.40,111,11.1,", ov-1-i "1 4'. Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 13 4 0 0 RrM :?p i Lane LOS B C A A Approach LOS B B Average Delay 1.7 ON:- I 6COAM-4 fiqiin,', Analysis Period (min) 15 2009 Design Hour Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Morning Peak Hour Page 2 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 3: Maryland Street & Airport Drive 3/31/2009 ON% - - ---- W ----------- Lane Configurations 0. . ...... 6, 55 34­`­' Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free bra iN I% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 n T ... . 1 - n Z. ­.- wi A' Pedestrians fade Wid Walking Speed (ft/s) porcent ajockage Right turn flare (veh) .... ..... . .. None�I.Fq,, Median storage veh) U pX, platoon unblocked v urb e 006flilcti f -­,"t ... .... . J_ .�92 vC I, stage 1 conf Vol OU, stage 2 vCu, unblocked Vol 1004 920 348 920 920 553 349 553 to, ­7 IC, 2 stage (s) (s): 3,5 L_ 4 PO queue free % 100 100 100 13 100 84 99 100 ty ,Volume Total 0 216 85 562 349 Volume Left 0 216 0 9 0 V ..... .. ... . cSH 1760 249 531 1215 1700 QtqmA w acl ' ' Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 179 14 1 0 co' Lane LOS A F B A Approach 6.0 ;2 Approach LOS A F we 51; Average Delay 13.5 Irttrsectlorr,Capapity ,1124fio Analysis Period (min) 15 2009 Design Hour Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 2 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 3: Maryland Street & Airport Drive 3/31/2009 Lane Configurations, Ibruriie' ve}r R -;; : (jr.: _ 2 i - 9:. '5 0`` Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2 �' 3 55 0 '_ " f 5=-:•,:r t Quit K ....s..._.._ Pedestrians Larne'-.-..i�t•���. , ; . � .. - . -- - ' Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) Wit Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked ``}r_�,��. ;�.�.j'�ry, ,V ,IG' �, • ', Q.,�rr .�JA''Q;� '•�:•,c�..'•.iaE� 9� -'.3�$; , rx..,l' . , 5� � �:. ^�>3:'l: �: �T,�.r,�� ,i.yLZ '.�,._...d..,:=a•Yn. ... _559, :'> ' - - _ -, :,1.i�7.. a�!r�-X=`J - vC1 stage 1 conf vol .:i*�'• - _.....s5_dQ,i� . .,,.._ :., -... vCu, unblocked vol 1008 926 348 926 926 559 349 559 �� n` a'' s ` :;7.,f.�-- ":5�' S2 • `7..� .5 - �:2 � '� f•'s,?', ;.. . '4:• - tC, 2 stage (s) 2:2''<:,;:,°:�.:': pO queue free 00 1 100 14 100 84 99 100 •527., "�1:5+`:. . :'�"-=7- - _ _. , fl1UrflE3_':t�,,;:;,;., r : . ::212 „83 ..: , 568.. „' 349 _ .'- •: Volume Left 0 cSH 1700 247 527 1215 1700 �ll An 0.80k ONES, --,_�M'•.i .;A!.i Queue Length 95th (ft) r•..FfF. 0 175 14 .... 1 0 ' Y'� 13)'��'._�-�,'�'.y-•�69_ �3 � 1`-•_��. �}�,•' - � ' S��yt:�_r,,,,,`�:,.`3. �;;''.:�.r�.;:;f,�, - ::,.s! -_(. . Lane LOS A F B A 0�.104 h WIN l?}I �; 's•SY, P., -i- Y,�: � <.�:+in.. � �41 53.5- :� Approach LOS A F Average Delay 13.1 �RNe0"wo`'Ca.� aci��-;'{yI fw1la';l^.U.,r *zrv. n.:a_- h.�.rc :r_r,.i- tlS_.=c;i,.i..i=..E.�-.:.' ....�a. .�,.-.•.Sti.�..`-„,.ti,.,i:.?.t, .55.Q0 wo{5• R,`e_tf Analysis Period (min) .-.«.. r-..__;.•- ..-...._....ir....;�r> u_ LC'"r....=i�,.��,," �,.,�-,, i: rt:. t_. 15 1 2011 No Build Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 2 Burlington international Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 3: Maryland Street & Airport Drive 3/31/2009 II w-a", W-11; Lane Configurations Yof! :O _31 0 9Qf 9R. Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s), erc R6hf­turn flare (veh) RIrl Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked 1F, vC1, stage 1 conf vol Y C vCu, unblocked vol 1024 934 356 934 934 559 357 559 2 jR.' LIE 4- tC, 2 stage (s) pO queue free % 100 100 100 6 100 83 99 100 J '59 A RED 4 97 Ll� 23 -- ": -90 Volume Left 0 230 0 9 0 cSH 1700 244 527 1207 1700 '.4 AIR R P, Queue Length 95th (11) 0 212 15 1 0 M2 T1 Lane LOS A F B A Approach LOS A F Average Delay 17.2 wee ide-Q411,14 OR Analysis Period (min) 15 I 2011 DHV Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 2 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 3: Maryland Street & Airport Drive 3/30/2009 ---* -► ---* '�- 1 Lane Configurations Vof�(evelR:_, 2t$ , _ g = 57 a; Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 R: - ouri rate' f` awr ` 0 ...i�E... 21$ ,-> 0, �ihz u :: 9- -. ;,4= tl:x�. • r d... Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) poko, pX, platoon unblocked UGGo lice" iY' ri .��,;_,_;;• "� 3�6`�: g�,`is�:. 9 � 7�1s�F' •-:,: 57 ,! vC1, stage 1 conf vol - - vCu, unblocked vol 1036 9 50 358 950 951 5 574 39- 574 •ktni. 111, 'IS-$"' tC, 2 stage (s) <. 3 - - p0 queue free % 100 100 100 8 100 83 99 100 - Wa— } Y '',.. %� •K _ •:�Yli •.Zi:'•tM"V 'IC.^ •V''l.i' - _ --~ V ' -•i /':' : VOR Volume Left 0 218 0 9 0 cSH 1700 237 516 1205 1700 �����„-���A�pttl!: .'�x",��`�'- 't��2 ,.. �lx.�?i,. `�:••i1��; „ �t0�21:r _ - � - .,.._ - Queue Length 95th (ft) 0,. 198 15 1 0 _ Lane LOS A F B A wa-63,.3 i , Approach LOS A F �;.;g:. `"`�S •'�,�r���i „"�' - l rc � is '.:�:3mr:*•::t�c _!.:-r �:'r �� �.�;H-" �. "�c�-�— x-_,.�'"`"`--� - �s -v.' �•� .1"' ram.>':: _ Average Delay 15.6 ;,, 'se tio� Ca:, .�- CJ�t;llza``o�'i�'•G`"".�°' ;-. :;�-� -D -: - - :,:-� �.�� - - _ Analysis Period (min) 15 2016 No Build Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 2 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 3: Maryland Street & Airport Drive 3/30/2009 Lane Configurations � Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free DA % Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 •` §( - , �' M 27 N II 3 M-51 Pedestrians P WRAM - K:11 Walking Speed (ft/s) N 0`10 Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) 0 s -SiM4 101 1, " pX, platoon unblocked h 00 wo YON;@ ir 1� 57-4; :A7 VC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1078 972 380 972 973 574 381 574 3 6 g U W, tC, 2 stage (s) - - 4,11 1 2 10 pO queue free % 100 100 100 0 100 79 99 100 6'z f ... On . .... ..... - .... . . V T, 27 � -`06 P, Volume Left 0 270 0 9 0 cSH 1700 229 516 1183 1700 Fin 107: " Q 4V QueWLength 95th (ft) Queue_ " ' 0 - I 323 19 1 0 06 Lane LOS A F B A Approach LOS A F Average Delay 33.4 ART, .". , Analysis Period (min) 15 2016 Design Hour Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 2 Burlington Airport Traffic Signal Warrant Check Count Projection Check Check Count Projection Check Airport brit I Airport Drive Exit Count Count Count Airport Drive Grown to 2009 @1 059" Count 6/28/2005 I Grown to 2009 (a) 1 134' 11/20/2008 6/412009 6/28/2005 Seasonal factor (al 0 86 11/20/2008 8-9 AM 133 24 151 27 46 9-10 AM 182 70 206 79 10-11 AM 221 72 251 82 11-12 PM 265 77 301 87 12-1 PM 205 90 232 102 1-2 PM 195 64 221 73 2-3 PM 129 47 146 53 3-4 PM 162 54 194 61 4-5 PM 239 92 271 104 198 5-6 PM 200 102 227 116 127 6-7 PM 1 182 1 45 1 206 1 51 NOTES 'Airport Growth (1 032) 2006 to 2009 = 1 134 "Airport Drive =(1 134 - 2(Area Growth (1 053) 2005 to 2009 =1 021)) / 3 Airport Drive annual growth = (1 032 i 2(1 053)) / 3 = 1 014 Prepared by Stantec on 06/09 31 58 65 Count /4/2009 Major I MinorI (Y N)vd 177 318 161 290 164 333 451 178 N 167 266 152 242 394 286 N 132 (+) 60 (+) 193 271 176 247 191(ok) 332 (-) 423 332 N (Y) 272 270 248 246 494 388 N 239 280 218 255 473 334 N 215 238 196 217 413 294 N 196 236 179 215 393 199 N 146 (+) 68 (ok) 281 297 250 270 307(-) 264 (ok) 526 245 Y 393 306 358 279 417 297 637 375 Y 368 288 335 262 329 211 597 342 Y 195 1 180 1 178 1 164 1 1 1 1 1 342 1 257 1 N (+) projection is high (-) projection/ factoring is low 4 Hours Exceed Traffic Signal Warrant Crtieria Conclusion Traffic Signal at Exit Driveway is not warranted per most likely warranting condition 8 hours of average day required To meet warrants 25-50 additional vehicles are required during one or more hours of average day This would be Major I Lane 500 vph realized with 5 to 10 percent growth and likely reached within 4-7 years at an annual growth rate of 1 014 Minor 2 lanes 200 v h Chittenden County MPO Page 1 30 Kimball Ave., Suite 206 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Site Code: 000000000035 Sobr35' AIRPORT DR. NORTH OF AIRPORT RD. http://www.ccmpo.org/ Station ID, Sobr35 dirt. NB / dir2. SB AIRPORT DR. NORTH OF AIRPORT RD. Town South Burlington/ Speed Limit. 35 Counters. Taylor and Laura Date Start. 03-Jul-06 Start 03-Jul-06 Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Week Average Time NB SB NB SR MR SR MR RR MR RR MR Cra KIP cn KID 00 1200 — -- - —_— AM 41 72 22 66 43 102 44 114 36 98 35 121 37 96 01 00 ` 12 12 7 17 11 13 16 50 5 20 16 11 11 20 0200 13 2 6 8 6 15 5 10 16 22 7 14 9 12 03 00 27 8 17 4 23 5 23 5 22 6 23 16 22 7 0400 88 33 141 75 116 67 105 33 110 24 143 49 117 47 0500 114 81 295 241 255 205 194 162 179 123 189 133 204 158 0600 101 102 286 316 251 278 229 233 154 136 165 147 198 202 0700 66 79 285 424 237 393 249 383 124 175 115 144 179 266 0800 100 145 289 393 293 405 283 400 143 220 139 164 208 288 09,00 158 192 309 340 367 404 301 347 256 294 222 281 269 310 1000 390 368 268 284 414 469 484 489 459 429 346 333 303 310 381 383 1100 329 471 242 293 413 456 377 483 392 502 311 401 256 328 331 419 1200 PM 333 366 230 242 412 531 421 504 441 466 308 345 289 274 348 390 01 00 332 362 249 263 425 448 382 443 443 434 344 344 278 295 350 370 0200 354 384 271 236 388 472 362 376 430 466 330 408 275 285 344 375 0300 374 375 276 309 506 456 504 466 494 484 328 286 362 295 406 382 0400 364 434 227 321 506 550 490 523 497 514 231 325 310 440 375 444 0500 294 318 244 272 472 386 454 412 489 437 257 281 289 291 357 342 06.00 209 204 176 240 251 312 289 324 273 279 179 236 214 319 227 273 0700 173 220 127 164 204 222 180 160 234 246 137 101 129 214 169 190 0800 158 142 110 158 211 176 174 175 203 274 123 111 158 168 162 172 0900 111 199 102 110 133 232 153 193 153 196 140 181 115 174 130 184 1000 113 125 125 153 101 138 136 168 148 205 96 135 102 178 117 157 11 00 111 174 68 148 115 207 101 192 136 292 81 122 71 218 98 193 Lane 364b 4142 3435 3919 620 6939 b1U9 b/95 U41 Hybl 4Lbb 4/1/ 42u5 40by nu4y bbau Day 7787 7354 13147 12904 13202 8983 _ 9074 10729 _ AM 10.00 11:00 10:00 11:00 10:00 10:00 10.00 10:00 10:00 11:00 10:00 11:00 10:00 1100 10.00 1100 Peak Vol. 390 471 268 293 414 469 484 489 459 502 346 401 _ 303 328 381 419 PM _ 15.00 16-00 15-00 16:00 15-00 16:00 15:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 1300 14:00 15-00 16:00 15.00 16.00 Peak Vol. 374 434 276 321 506 550 504 523 497 514 344 408 362 440 406 444 13MUS 31lHM N w NO — z x (ro o- i-- z O�w o F- ax Crw a 0% WHITE STREET Ln Qo AIRPORT LONG 0% TERM PARKING > ENTRANCE 0 0 16' 16' o CL a I NOT TO SCALE Sam Bu&Qtm V-nt EXISTING CONDITION: INTERSECTION #5 Stantec B°°'"°mTn''"°° INTERSECTION OF AIRPORT DRIVE/WHITE STREEV StanO¢ Ci°nan°In°Sommte Inc 195310247 31101309 AND AIRPORT LONG TERM PARKING ENTRANCE :oz CRASH RATE WORKSHEET CITY/TOWN South Burlington COUNT DATE 11/20/2008 UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED — INTERSECTION DATA —....... .... .. .... ..... ... MAJOR STREET Airport Drive MINOR STREET(S) White Street COLLISION DIAGRAM (Label Approaches) Airport Drive Extension Southbound North l ' 3 mil D a 1D rp o v 0 6 T 3Lu apo 2 f a 4 5,7 I CD Airport Drive Northbound Peak Hour Volumes APPROACH. 1 2 3 4 5 Total Crash Record Number When (Date/Time) Accident Type Injuries Weather Notes: 0414/991-058 1/17/05, 11:08 angle property damage only snow NB LT truck w/wide turn scraped EB stopped vehicle 0414/5596-05 4/2/05, 13:00 broadside property damage only rain EB thru hit NB thru 0414/6573-05 4/28/05, 21:26 sideswipe property damage only clear SB sideswipe 0414/15740-05 11/26/05, 20:10 angle property damage only clear EB thru collided with NB left 0414/1436-05 10/21/05, 22:45 angle property damage only clear NB left collided with EB thru 0414/12832-06 9/29/06, 13:26 angle property damage only clear EB thru collided with NB left 0414/8947-07 7/11/07, 19:07 angle property damage only rain EB thru collided with NB left South Burlington Vermont Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Green Mountain Drive. Airport Drive at /55 �South Burlington, VT U.S.A. t::P Burlington International Airport Traffic Study White StreetTel. 05403 802.864.0223 Stantm Fax.802.864.0165 195310247 3/17/20091 1 www.stantec.com Airport Drive at White Street South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Study File Name : Airport Drive at White Street -AM Site Code 11202008 Start Date ° 11/20/2008 Page No 1 Grmins Printrari- aidos Airport Long Term Parking From North Airport Park & Shuttle Lot From East Airport Drive From South White Street From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Totai Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right TI1ru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App, Total tnt. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 06:30 AM _ 06.45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 25 0 32 0 0 25 32 31 47 3 0 1 0 0 0 34 48 59 82 Total 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 57 0 571 78 4 0 0 82 141 07 00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 28 0 30 41 1 0 0 42 72 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 51 0 53 69 1 0 0 70 124 07.30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 43 0 43 64 5 0 0 69 113 0745 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 65 0 68 106 1 0 0 107 178 Total 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 4 5 2 187 0 194 280 8 0 0 288 487 08.00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 1 0 57 0 58 84 1 0 0 85 I 146 08-15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 45 0 46 86 2 0 0 88 136 08 30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 3 0 39 0 42 75 1 1 0 77 122 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 51 0 53 76 2 0 0 78 132 _ Total 0 1 0 0 TF 0 2 6 0 8 7 0 192 0 199 321 6 1 0 3281 536 09:00 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 1 2 32 0 35 40 0 1 0 41 80 09:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 46 0 49 68 2 0 0 70 120 Grand Total 2 4 0 0 6 0 5 10 0 15 16 4 514 0 534 787 20 2 0 809 1364 Apprch % 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 3.0 0.7 96.3 0.0 97.3 2.5 0.2 0.0 Total % 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.4 00 0.4 0.7 0.0 1.1 1.2 0.3 37.7 0.0 391 57.7 1.5 0.1 0.0 59.3 Airport Long Term Parking Airport Park & Shuttle Lot Airport Drive White Street From North From East From South From West _ Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App" Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int Total Total Total Total HeaK Hour from Ut7:6U AM t0 U9:15 AM - FeaK 1 Ot 1 Intersection 07:45 AM Volume 1 1 0 0 2 0 3 6 0 9 7 1 206 0 214 351 5 1 0 357 582 Percent 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 3.3 0.5 96.3 0.0 98.3 1.4 0.3 0.0 07:45 Volume 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 65 0 68 106 1 0 0 107 178 Peak Factor 0.817 High Int. 07:45 AM 08:00 AM 07:45 AM 07:45 AM Volume 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 3 2 1 65 0 68 106 1 0 0 107 Peak Factor 0.500 0.750 0.787 0.834 Airport Drive at White Street South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Study File Name : Airport Drive at White Street -AM Site Code : 11202008 Start Date 11/20/2008 Page No : 1 (Srnimc Pnnror!_ ha�ni vchirinc _ Airport Long Term Parking From North Airport Park & Shuttle Lot From East Airport Drive From South White Street From West Start Time Right I Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Factor 101 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.p 1.0 1.01 1.01 1,0 1 1.0 06:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 06:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 4 07 00 AM 07.15 AM 07 30 AM 07.45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 08.15 AM 0 0 0 0 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 08:4_5 AM 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 09-00 AM 0 0 0 0 09:15 AM 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 00 0.0 00 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 11 0 11 4 0 0 0 4 15 0 0 0 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 4 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 2 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 10 0 10 15 0 0 0 15 25 0 0 0 4 0 4 2 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 2 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 30 0 30 25 0 0 0 25 55 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.5 00 54.5 45.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 45 5 Airport Long Term Parking Airport Park & Shuttle Lot Airport Drive White Street From North From East From South From West _ Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Pe ds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Total Total Peak hour From 06:30 AM to u9:i5 Ann - Peak i or i Intersection 07:30 AM Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 13 0 0 0 13 25 Percent 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 08 15 Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 10 Peak Factor 0.625 High Int. 6:15:00 AM 6:15:00 AM 08:15 AM 08:15 AM Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 Peak Factor 0.750 0,542 Airport Drive at White Street South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Study File Name : Airport Drive at White Street -AM Site Code ; 11202008 Start Date ° 11 /20/2008 Page No 1 Airport Long Term Parking Airport Park 8 Shuttle Lot Airport Drive White Street From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds gyp' Right Thru Left Peds App. Int. Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0 1 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 06.30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 27 32 3 0 0 35 62 06.45 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 33 0 33 47 1 0 0 48 83 Total 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 60 0 60 79 4 0 0 83 145 07 00 AM 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 07 30 AM 0 0 0 0 07:_45 AM 1 0 0 0 Total 1 0 0 0 08.00 AM 0 0 0 0 08.15 AM 0 0 0 0 08:30 AM 0 1 0 0 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 Total 0 1 0 0 09.00 AM 0 2 0 0 09:15 AM 0 1 0 0 Grand Total 2 4 0 0 Apprch % 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 6 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 5 10 0 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.0 0 1 1 30 0 32 42 1 0 0 43 75 1 2 0 54 0 56 69 1 0 0 70 127 1 0 0 46 0 46 66 5 0 0 71 118 2 2 1 68 0 71 107 1 0 0 108 182 4 5 2 198 0 205 284 8 0 0 292 502 3 1 0 59 0 60 88 1 0 0 89, 152 2 1 0 49 0 50 92 2 0 0 941 146 2 3 0 41 0 44 77 1 1 0 791 126 1 2 0 53 0 55 79 2 0 0 811 137 8 7 0 202 0 209 336 6 1 0 343j 561 2 1 2 36 0 39 42 0 1 0 43 85 0 3 0 48 0 51 71 2 0 0 73 125 15 16 4 544 0 564 812 20 2 0 834 1419 2.8 0.7 96.5 0.0 97.4 2.4 0.2 0.0 1.1 1.1 0.3 38.3 0.0 39.7 57.2 1.4 0.1 00 58.8 Airport Long Term Parking Airport Park & Shuttle Lot Airport Drive White Street From North From East From South From West Start Time Right I Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Int. Total Total Total Total Total Peak Hour From 06:30 AM to 09-15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:45 AM Volume 1 1 0 0 2 0 3 6 0 9 7 1 217 0 225 364 5 1 0 370 606 Percent 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 3.1 0.4 96.4 0.0 98.4 1.4 0.3 0.0 07,45 Volume 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 68 0 71 107 1 0 0 108 182 Peak Factor 0.832 High Int. 07:45 AM 08:00 AM 07:45 AM 07:45 AM Volume 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 3 2 1 68 0 71 107 1 0 0 108I Peak Factor 0.500 0.750 0.792 0.856 Airport Drive at White Street South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Study File Name : airport drive at white street -pm Site Code 11192008 Start Date = 11/19/2008 Page No : 1 r,rni inc Printari- ai dnc Airport Long Term Parking Airport Park & Shuttle Lot Airport Drive White Street From North From East From South From West Start Time A R=ghtLeft Peds gyp' Right Thru Left Peds App Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Int. Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 8 3 0 85 0 88 78 0 0 0 78 174 03.45 PM 1 1 0 0 2 0 4 5 0 9 6 2 68 0 76 71 1 0 0 72 159 Total 1 1 0 0 2 0 6 11 0 17 9 2 153 0 164 149 1 0 0 150 333 04.00 PM 1 2 5 0 04:15 PM 0 1 0 0 04-30 PM 2 1 0 0 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 Total 3 4 5 0 05:00 PM 1 1 0 0 05.15 PM 0 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 05.45 PM 0 0 0 0 Total 1 1 0 0 0&00 PM 1 1 0 0 06.15PM 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 6 7 5 0 Apprch % 33.3 38.9 27.8 0.0 Total % 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.0 8 0 1 5 0 1 0 2 5 0 3 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 12 0 6 17 0 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 7 5 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 18 1 20 34 0 1.8 36.4 61.8 0.0 0.9 0.1 1.0 1.7 0.0 6 3 1 114 0 118 79 2 1 0 82 214 7 2 0 93 0 95 63 1 2 0 65 169 7 5 2 143 0 150 63 1 0 0 64 224 3 6 0 100 0 106 78 0 0 0 78 187 23 16 3 450 0 469 283 4 3 0 290 794 5 2 2 149 0 153 75 0 0 0 75 235 6 0 0 120 0 120 71 1 0 0 72 198 2 1 0 76 0 77 37 1 0 0 38 117 0 0 0 49 0 49 33 0 0 0 33 82 13 3 2 394 0 399 216 2 0 0 218 F 632 1 0 1 63 0 64 37 0 0 0 37 104 1 0 0 52 0 52 38 0 0 0 38 91 55 28 8 1112 0 1148 723 7 3 0 733 1954 2.4 0-7 96.9 0.0 98.6 1.0 0.4 0.0 2.8 1.4 04 56.9 0.0 58.8 37.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 37.5 Airport Long Term Parking Airport Park & Shuttle Lot Airport Drive White Street From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds F App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App' Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Total Total Total F'eaK Hour rrom U3:3u Ym t0 ut):'Ib F m - F'eaK 1 01 1 Intersection 04-30 PM Volume 3 2 0 0 5 1 10 10 0 Percent 60.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 48 47.6 47.6 0.0 05.00 Volume 1 1 0 0 2 1 2 2 0 Peak Factor High Int. 04:30 PM 04:30 PM Volume 2 1 0 0 3 0 3 4 0 Peak Factor 0.417 Int. Total 21 13 4 512 0 529 287 2 0 0 289 844 2.5 0.8 96.8 0.0 99.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 5 2 2 149 0 153 75 0 0 0 75 235 0.898 05:00 PM 04:45 PM 7 2 2 149 0 153 78 0 0 0 78 0.750 0.864 0.926 Airport Drive at White Street South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Study File Name - airport drive at white street pm Site Code : 11192008 Start Date 11/19/2008 Page No ; 1 r;rnunc Pnntprl_ hAgVV vphiclac Airport Long Term Parking From North Airport Park & Shuttle Lot From East Airport Drive From South White Street From West Start Time Right Thru Left I Pads App. Total Right Thru Left Pads App' Total Right Thru Left Pads App- Total Right Thru Left Pads App. Total Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 03-30 PM 03-45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 3 _ Total 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 4 5 04.00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 04.15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 04.45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 5 0 0 0 5 6 BREAK - Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 9 0 0 0 9 11 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 I 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1B.2 0.0 18.2 81.8 0.0 00 0.0 81.8 Airport Long Term Parking From North Airport Park & Shuttle Lot From East Airport Drive From South White Street From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Tkpotal Right Thru Left Pads TAopp� Right Thru Left Pads Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int Total Peak Hour From 03:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 03:30 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 7 0 0 0 7 8 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 03.45 Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 3 Peak Factor 0.667 High Int 3:15.00 PM 3:15:00 PM 03:45 PM 03:30 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 Peak Factor 0.250 0.875 - - - ---- ---------- -- - - -- --- - - - - Airport Drive at White Street South Burlington, Vermont BTV Parking Garage Traffic Impact Study File Name airport drive at white street_pm Site Code : 11192008 Start Date = 11/19/2008 Page No 1 r,mi inc Prinfari- ai itnc _ haavv vPhirlac Airport Long Term Parking Airport Park & Shuttle Lot Airport Drive White Street From North From East From South From West Start Time j Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Factor iO3:30 -1.0 1.0 1.0 1 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 8 3 0 85 0 88 80 0 0 0 80 176 03'45 PM 1 1 0 0 2 0 4 5 0 9 6 2 69 0 77 73 1 0 0 74 162 Total 1 1 0 0 2 0 6 11 0 17 9 2 154 0 165 153 1 0 0 154 338 04.00 PM 1 2 5 0 8 0 1 5 0 6 3 1 114 0 118 80 2 1 0 83 215 04:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 5 0 7 2 0 93 0 95 65 1 2 0 68 171 04:30 PM 2 1 0 0 3 0 3 4 0 7 5 2 144 0 151 64 1 0 0 65 226 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 6 0 100 0 106 79 0 0 0 79 188 i ToCad 3 4 5 0 12 0 6 17 0 23 16 3 451 0 470 288 4 3 0 295 800 05:00 PM 1 1 0 0 2 1 2 2 0 5 2 2 149 0 153 75 0 0 0 75 235 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 6 0 0 120 0 120 71 1 0 0 72 198 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 76 0 77 37 1 0 0 38 117 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 49 33 0 0 0 33 82 Total 1 1 0 0 2 1 7 5 0 13 3 2 394 0 399 216 2 0 0 218 _ 632 06:00 PM 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 63 064 37 0 0 0 37 104 06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 52 0 52 38 0 0 0 38 91 Grand Total 6 7 5 0 18 1 20 34 0 55 28 8 1114 0 1150 732 7 3 0 742 1965 Apprch % 33.3 38.9 27.8 0.0 1.8 36.4 61.8 0.0 2.4 0.7 96.9 0.0 98.7 09 0.4 0.0 Total % 03 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.9 0.1 1.0 1.7 0.0 2.8 1.4 0.4 56.7 0.0 58.5 37.3 0.4 0.2 0.0 37.8 Airport Long Term Parking Airport Park & Shuttle Lot Airport Drive White Street From North From East From South From West _ Start Time =RightThru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App' Total Right Thru Left Peds App_ Total Int. Total Peak Hour From U3:JU PM to UU:15 PM - Peak 1 or 1 Intersection 04:30 PM Volume 3 2 0 0 5 1 10 10 0 21 13 4 513 0 530 289 2 0 0 291 847 Percent 60.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 0.0 2.5 0.8 96.8 0.0 99.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 05:00 Volume 1 1 0 0 2 1 2 2 0 5 2 2 149 0 153 75 0 0 0 75 235 Peak Factor 0.901 High Int 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 05.00 PM 04:45 PM Volume 2 1 0 0 3 0 3 4 0 7 2 2 149 0 153 79 0 0 0 79 Peak Factor 0.417 0.750 0.866 0.921 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 2: White Street & Airport Drive Extension 3/30/2009 IT Lane Configurations 41- w ON 6 7 2 Sign Control yield Stop Free Free 0% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 2 R-0 re, 4. Pedestrians Cane;tliidCO Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) yg §n pX, platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 547 550 2 999 546 6 2 10 gn� 01, m tC, 2 stage (s) 3 6, pO queue free % 100 68 58 94 99 100 83 100 Na r 458- 2 Volume Left 1 7 269 0 cSH 1046 151 1620 1623 Queue Length 95th (ft) 57 6 15 0 .7 IN Lane LOS B M D A Approach LOS B D Average Delay 10.0 li$ersect%gttCa'"c` '57. t% Analysis Period (min) 15 2009 Design Hour Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Morning Peak Hour Page 1 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 2: White Street & Airport Drive Extension 3/3112009 Lane Configurations 5 h., 4 ei j 2 Q M. e Vo (�ew,-- Sign Control Yield Stop Free Free -2% Ora* Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2 .... . .. . .... Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) NO , 04ge:: 3 NOON _-- Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) .0U. soe;0,0, pX, platoon unblocked M 168.`24 v61 'stage 1 conf vol j- v�2, sog"o t2 061 Nobf 1-.-1`1::S vCu, unblocked vol 1304 1305 2 1658 1297 13 2 21 t. si I (sj tC, 2 stage (s) 5 po queue free % 100 98 67 67 88 100 61 100 Volume Total 362 25 650 6 Volume Left 0 12 637 4 cSH 1028 55 1627 1608 . ... .... . . -K V 91y"Iffi.-O VJK#40-0.10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 40 43 48 -0 Coa -j- -A, . .. .. ..... tt 00y; 1 -11 -T Lane LOS B F A A A J,16 4" Approach LOS B F Average Delay 11.7 'Widn , - , Z. btvice; Qzr , 17i,� , X C. 9i tiliz 72300 Analysis Period (min) 15 2009 Design Hour Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 1 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 2: White Street & Airport Drive Extension 3/31/2009 Lane Configurations 0* 4'ly Sign Control Yield Stop Free Free fail' da/0 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1U1 ,2 iyA41,P, fz1 64 `fl1 5 4 Pedestrians Il A.V Walking Speed (ft1s) Right turn flare (veh) M.- ON . . ..... .51 MOedian storage veh) PSO WW ffil pX, platoon unblocked P., 0 i �KiO UK tzvzww, IN, 2. I W� vC1, stage 1 conf vol 'm vCu, unblocked vol 1312 1313 2 1667 1305 13 2 21 7 RAN tC, 2 stage (s) 3 :2 pO queue free % 100 98 67 66 88 100 61 100 A Mae a- VIA Volume Left 0 12 641 cSH 1027 54 1627 Q 4 !11P_-ffl Queue Length 95th (ft) 40 44 48 Lane LOS B F A Approach LOS B F Average Delay 11.8 lift sec# ' " 72.8% Analysis Period (min) 15 4 1608 0 A 2011 No Build Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 1 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 2: White Street &-Airport Drive Extension 3/31/2009 Lane Configurations 4 4* 4* 4 e- 0-P N fg 049 5 Sign Control Yield Stop Free Free I40/- Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 2 J2 Ab Pedestrians Walking Speed (fVs) Right to flare (Veh Median storage veh) �O81S1�± '- l pX, platoon unblocked 1091, r I f L-I I d W vC1, stage I conf vol vCu, unblocked Vol 1326 1327 2 1689 1319 13 2 21 rC4 01-4 :Rs 7. tC, 2 stage (s) pO queue free % 100 98 66 64 M R., N 87 100 60 100 —3f MOO 2 Volume Left 0 12 648 4 &MAW, cSH 1027 52 1627 1608 pia i M. jA .4 , Queue Length 95th (ft) 42 46 49 0 611. Lane LOS B F A A XNAT Approach LOS B F w- ffi— W.0 N Average Delay 12.0 eftCa ,pacU'WMfRNjN 73.40/6 00D Analysis Period (min) 15 2011 DHV Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 1 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 2: White Street & Airport Drive Extension 3130/2009 Lane Configurations 4.1 ---' h fij - f/6" NO, W 4� -13 P "D, Sign Control Yield Stop Free Free -b%, Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 fig on , 2', -37 5 SIMI-14"I'L, 4 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Ni MIN Right turn flare (veh) 0-61 Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked U &A ll34 0 "A" vC1. stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1347 1348 2 1710 1340 14 2 22 tC, 2 stage (s)� -, '14'sm pO queue free 100 98 66 59 86 100 60 100 7 4 ffin "I - 1: r ,. a IN, - 4 872, "'27- Volume Left 0 13 658 4 7 f cSH 1024 49 1627 1607 Nw. "%q IN6 ON 0.�l i Queue Length 95th (ft) 42 52 50 , 0 W.M."O 11, Lane LOS B F A A Approach LOS Y B F Average Delay 12.6 secm 4:9 01 c2 0AP, , 7-- Analysis Period (min) 15 2016 No Build Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 1 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 2: White Street & Airport Drive Extension 3/30/2009 ^~� �—�T��^.'YJ .. "i1`' �ts_�n>ici y���(EL�,l': _ ^'"a'C :yJ^'�4 xi;��,•Z:U — � � p- �-fC:._., � � cu�r�z, .v%�r:-:rs, seG+F:.=:%iZ - fu' < vy^=- -`1?`, . ' �;i5 a-_' _ �`i" _• 33 �'-. '.8+'^�irs.7 -?�=� tom.._. - , . �=-, _-�_ w _, ,.. ..�_"__'�: _...a.�_...., _. .�_ _.,, �.:., ........ . _.. - _ ,__ , .; •. ,: — _,.-...� .� Lane Configurations 4 4. !oJii;Te (vef€, (a 32rsa; j;^ 73z 17 Sign Control Yield Stop Free Free Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 KPUS :.A?`__ (`.: 2 "392r-; - .1 tom:; 1H fi€4:5 t7.... 4.-,. 2 Q Pedestrians t. ttlT , -111- Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) •. ,♦ •• •: 0011^I1S.+i..-.�•,_ +-'-�mi�ll Median storage v RA toon unblocked platoon C 22.. vCi, stage 1 conf vol _ vCu, unblocked vol 1387 13 88 2 1772 1380 14 2 22 lqjj'6a.4'4 ySe:�;'._�._ :SLia'l,'-'.-. tC, 2 stage (s) .. .' ^, - _ I .. S�. -`,' `' •'_ ' - - - (_�,. -i%�".Ffa•'.,�'-• _ _ ., "3iii� thin .,. _ _ _ - -. - 32F:fva:SFCc '-�:?Y!!-'�.8� � -- f'�•r'�.,L`�-ij . Y� _ _ _ _ - -- - - _ _ _' _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ :. _'_ :-:.' ..- ," .. p0 queue free % _.. 100 98 64 - -53 �- 85 100 58 . 100 ay Volume Left 0 13 678 4 cSH 1023 43 1627 1607 Queue Length 95th (ft) 46 58 53 0 Lane LOS B F A A •,�44::f'r- .S .=Cfi: `F Approach LOS B F Average Delay 13.4 f5ee(oj GaSfi 7fil /o Analysis Period (min) 15 f.... - - � .''�^, nib=ls,'t�^3 • 1 2016 Design Hour Volumes HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 1 BFJ Buckhurst Fish & Jacquemart Inc. 115 5th Avenue New York, NY 10003 Tel (212) 353-7474 Fax (212) 353-7494 Memorandum To: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer, City of South Burlington From: Georges Jacquemart, P.E.,AICP Tel (212) 353 7477 Email g.jacquemartCu)[,"jpionni,..g.;:o:►r Alireza Rabiee Tel (212) 353 7486 Email a.rabiee@bfjplanning.com Subject: Review of Burlington Intc,s nationa`. Air po<t 2007 Traffic; Study Date: September 10, 2009 We have reviewed the June 19, 2009 r�,r; -r, by �'iantec on the Burlington International Airport Traffic Study regarding the proposed par;. -ic, expa ision and futu; r: growth. We have the following comments: 1. According to the Campbell R ^.Y :, Ei.,_iinae­ `-:,-e--a%, Lett,cr dated Jan�,ary 2009 on the Burlington International Airp.:.I (h, t;ie /,pper:,Jix), he Burlington Airport (BTV) had u 6.77% annual growth in errplurw-inern;s ;rum 2000 io 2007. Between 2007 and 2008 total enplanements increased by 7.84%. The some firm analyzes three different forecasting methods for the future and recommends a forecast method based on BTU's market share change in relation to the total regional market. This means an average annual growth rate for 5.3% from 2008 to 2030. The 5.3% annual growth is considered as an intermediate growth pattern, above the low arowth forecast and below the high forecast. Stantec used a 3.2% enplanement growth rate. This seems to be on the low side. 2. Traffic Impact Methodology: Stantec used the 3.2% p.a. increase in enplanements to calculate the additional traffic generation for the airport. We recommend an alternative method to test the impacts of the parking capacity that is proposed to be added. The traffic consultant should calculate the trip generation rate per space of the existing parking garage and then apply this rate to the proposed additional parking spaces to estimate the additional traffic due to the parking expansions. The resulting traffic generation should be compared to the projected enplanement increase methodology (but with a growth rate that is higher than 3.2%). The consultant should then do the traffic impact analysis with the highest traffic generation. 3. It does not seem logical that inbound and outbound traffic distributions are different. The consultant should correct this or explain why the incoming and outgoing volumes in the directional distribution diagram (Figure 6) are different. 4. The traffic consultant should show LOS (Level of Service) and delay by lane group for each intersection and for existing, future no -build, future build and future build with mitigation scenarios so that the impacts can be clearly evaluated. 5. The traffic consultant should summarize mitigation measures clearly and explain when each measure should to be implemented. 6. The intersection of Williston Road and Airport Road should be analyzed as well. 7. The traffic consultant should discuss the extension of Airport Drive to mitigate traffic impacts along White Street and in the residential neighborhood. Traffic volumes along Ray Belair, Administrative Officer January 10, 2009 Page 2 White Street exceed the daily volumes that are normally considered as reasonable for a residential street (Source: Livable Streets, by Donald Appleyard). 8. The traffic consultant should assess potential TDM programs to reduce airport traffic, such as shuttle services. 9. The traffic consultant should assess the safety of the pedestrian crossings along Airport Drive. Please let us know if you have any question,;, r�gardirig this review. K 0 startec Memo To: Ray Belair, , Administrative Officer City of South Burlington From: David DeBaie John Leinwohl Stantec Consulting Services 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel: 802-864-0223 Fax: 802-864-0165 File:195310247 Date: September 17, 2009 Reference: Response to Comments on BTV 2009 Traffic Study This memo provides responses to the attached September 10, 2009 comment letter from Buckhurst Fish & Jacquemart Inc. regarding the BTV 2009 Traffic Study. Stantec has applied a 3.2 percent annual growth rate to project future airport traffic volumes. This growth rate was derived by Campbell and Paris Engineers for the purposes of updating the Airport Master Plan. This growth rate has been submitted and accepted by the Federal Aviation Administration for the purposes of the airport master plan update. As illustrated on page 3 of the Campbell & Paris Engineers memo entitled Forecast Letter Report — Burlington International Airport included in the appendix of the BTV 2009 Traffic Study, the determination of an appropriate growth rate for airport planning involves separate methodologies that produce low, medium, and high estimates of enplanements. (For the purpose of the traffic study, enplanements is the independent variable which most closely indicates future vehicle trips.) The low scenario assumes that the number of enplanements increase commissariat with the projected airport service area population growth which is 0.43 percent for the 2009 to 2025 period. The medium forecast examines BTV's market share of enplanements including all airports within 150 miles of BTV and applies an estimated annual increase in market share that yields a change from BTU's present 7.2 percent market share to 9.3 percent by 2030. The high forecast assumes an unlikely sustained growth at the rate experienced at BTV during recent years before the present economic slow down. Still another forecast developed by the FAA for BTV called the Terminal Area Forecast suggests 2.55 percent annual growth. In evaluating these scenarios, the longer historical record of enplanements at BTV reveals that preceding and succeeding high growth years there are years of much lesser and frequently negative "growth". High growth appears unsustainable and therefore inappropriate for capital planning. The medium growth scenario may be achieved through a sustained increase in One Team. Infinite Solutions. dtd v \19531active\1953102471avlatbn\memo\btvresponse to comments091709,doc Stantec September 18, 2009 Page 2 of 6 Reference: Response to Comments on BTV 2009 Traffic Study market share of the commercial enplanements market area within 150 miles of BTV however, the economy may shrink the market and the fortifying efforts of other airports may prevent an increased BTV market share. The medium forecast would yield a 25 percent growth in enplanements requiring an additional 9 daily departing flights by the end of that period. The approval letter from the FAA dated March 3, 2009 is included in the Airport Trip Generation section of the Airport Traffic Study appendix states "The data reasonably represents anticipated growth for future commercial operations at Burlington International Airport using enplanement, load factor and plane size forecast." 2. BFJ has recommended a reanalysis of the airport traffic impacts using a greater trip generation rate than that based on the 3.2% annual growth rate. BF& J further recommends an alternative methodology to calculate future airport trips and to test the impacts of the garage parking capacity that is proposed to be added. BF & J recommends calculating a trip generation rate per space for the parking garage and apply that rate to the proposed added spaces to identify future added trips. This suggested alternate methodology is not appropriate. The parking garage itself does not generate trips, rather airport passengers generate trips. The parking garage accommodates the trips generated by the airport. This principle may be expressed as follows: • If the airport did not exist, there would be no vehicle trips to and from the garage; • If the garage did not exist, those trips to the airport would still exist. Moreover, the inadequacy of the existing garage capacity may result in a greater number of trips. Driving airport passengers to the airport, driving away, picking up the returning passenger, and driving away create more trips than a passenger driving to the airport, parking, and leaving after their return flight. Management of the garage in terms of spaces used for long term and short term, public and private (rental cars) will have an additional effect on the number of trips to and from the garage. The percentage of the garage dedicated to each use is not likely to be the same after construction as many other management measures are being developed to improve its use. Regarding project traffic impacts due to a greater growth increment, additional impact due to a larger growth rate is not discernable at the study area intersections. Qualitatively, we offer the following sensitivity analysis: A. At the Airport Drive and White Street intersection, under existing conditions the unsignalized intersection operates at LOS F on the STOP controlled approaches due to the peak hour volume of traffic on Airport Drive. This condition does not appreciably change with or without airport growth. r PI September 18, 2009 Page 3 of 6 Reference: Response to Comments on BTV 2009 Traffic Study B. At Airport Drive and the Airport Exit, the existing condition at this unsignalized intersection relates to the delays to Exiting airport traffic which will experience LOS F until a traffic signal is warranted and constructed. In creased airport growth will hasten this warranting condition which depends on the midday growth of Airport Drive volumes. C. At the Employee Lot driveway and Airport drive intersection, the number of left turns by employees during the evening peak hour will not significantly change and therefore LOS A will also remain in the expected future regardless of the airport growth rate. D. At Airport Drive and the Airport Entrance, again, the absence of minor street traffic entering Airport Drive results in LOS A under existing and LOS B under year 2016 conditions with 25 percent growth. A significant decline in LOS at this intersection is not expected due to additional growth. E. At the Airport Drive and Airport Road intersection, LOS F conditions are experienced on the Airport Road approach under existing and future conditions independent of the airport growth rate. F. At the Williston Road (Route 2), Airport Drive and Kennedy Drive intersection, with or without the project the intersection operates at LOS E by 2011 and LOS F by 2016. Airport growth is not expected to significantly influence this intersection where approximately 13 percent of the volume are airport trips under existing and future conditions with 25 percent airport growth. 3. Existing BTV trip distribution patterns were applied to identify future trip distribution. These 2008 Airport Driveway observations are provided in the appendix section entitled Network Diagrams. These illustrate actual airport operations. (In the absence of the observations, assumptions would be required that may have included a common arrival and departure distribution pattern. 4. Analysis summary sheets providing LOS and delay by lane group have been prepared and are presented on the following pages. Airport Drive and White Street White Street Park & Shuttle Lot Airport Drive Airport Drive Eastbound Left Thru Right Westbound Left Thru Right Northbound Left Thru Right Southbound Right Thru Left Lane Use I _ _ + _ Overall LOS*** 2009 Volume (vph) 1 6 451 7 4 0 269 1 9 0 1 1 D DHV HCM LOS B D A D** per AM* Delay (sec) 11.1 1 130.8 7.4 1 30.8 Park & Shuttle Control Yield Stop Free Stop Drive 2009 Volume (vph) 0 2 360 12 12 1 637 5 16 4 2 0 F DHV HCM LOS B F A F** per PM* Delay (sac) 10.4 117 8.5 117 sack e Control Yield Stop Free Stop Drive 2011 Volume (vph) 0 2 361 12 12 1 641 5 16 4 2 0 F No Build HCM LOS B F B F per DHV Delay (sac) 10.4 120 8.5 120 Park & Shuttle Control Yield Stop Free Stop _ Drive 2011 Volume (vph) 0 2 369 12 12 1 648 5 16 4 2 0 F Build HCM LOS B F B F per DHV Delay (sec) _ 10.5 128 8.5 128 Park & Shuttle control Yield Stop Free Stop Drive 2016 Volume (vph) 0 2 370 13 13 1 658 5 17 4 2 0 F No Build HCM LOS B F A F per DHV Delay (sec) 10.5 145 8.5 145 Park & Shuttle Control Yield Stop Free Stop Drive 2016 Volume (vph) 0 3 392 13 13 1 678 5 17 4 2 0 F Build HCM LOS B F A F per DHV Delay (sec) 10.7 178 11.1 178 Park & Shuttle Control Yield Stop Free Stop Drive 2016 Volume (vph) Build HCM LOS No Mitigation required due to project impact DHV Delay (sec) Mitigated Control * AM volume adjusted to DHV per AM/ PM ratio. 2009 PM adjusted to DHV. " STOP control; assume similar delay as westbound approach. *** Assume worse case approach for unsignalized intersection LOS South Burlington Vermont / Stanlec Consulting Services, Inc 55 Green Mountain Drive Burlington Airport 2009 Traffic Study Synchro Analysis Results Summary Airport Drive and White Street South Burlington, VT u.s.A. 5403 41:;P1 Tel. 802-864-0223 StantK FW X. 802- 64-01COm 195310247 9114l2009 Airport Drive at Airport Exit Maryland Drive Airport Exit Airport Drive Airport Drive Eastbound Left Thru Right Westbound Left Thru Right Northbound Left Thru Right Southbound Right Thru Left Lane Use f y t- Overall LOS** 2009 DHV AM* Volume (vph) 1 0 2 52 0 40 2 242 0 2 443 0 C per Airport Exit HCM LOS B C A A A Delay (sec) 12.6 16.8 9.8 1 0 Control STOP STOP STOP Free Free 2009 DHV Volume (vph) 0 0 0 216 0 85 9 553 0 0 348 1 F HCM LOS A F B A A PM* Delay (sec) 0 70.3 13.1 0.2 O per Airport Exit Contro: STOP STOP STOP Fret; Free 2011 Volume (vph) 0 0 1 0 212 0 88 9 559 0 0 348 1 No Build HCM LOS A F B A A F DHV Delay (sec) 0 69.3 13.1 0.2 0 per Airport Exit Control STOP STOP STOP Free Free 2011 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 230 0 90 9 559 0 0 356 1 Build HCM LOS A F B A A F DHV Delay (see) 0 87.2 13.2 0.2 O per Airport Exit Control STOP STOP STOP Free Free 2016 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 218 0 85 9 574 0 0 358 1 No Build HCM LOS A F B A A F DHV Delay (sec) 0 83.0 13.4 0.2 0 per Airport Exit Control STOP j STOP STOP Free Free 2016 volume (vph) 0 0 0 270 0 106 9 574 0 0 380 1 Build HCM LOS A F B A A F DHV Delay (sec) 0 160 13.8 0.2 0 per Airport Exit Control STOP STOP STOP Free Free 2016 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 270 0 106 9 574 0 0 380 1 Build DHV HCM LOS A B B B A B Delay (sec) 0 14.7 110.9 11.4 8.9 Mitigated Signalized Mitigation proposed upon meeting MUTCD warrants" * AM volume adjusted to DHV per AM/ PM ratio. 2009 PM adjusted to DHV. ** Under existing conditions MUTCD warrant volume thresholds on Airport Drive are not exceeded during 8 hours of average day. South Burlington Vernon 1--=\ Stantec Consulting Services, Inc ✓� 55 Green Mountain Drive Synchro Analysis Results Summary South Burlington, VT u S.A Burlington Airport it t E t Ai i t Dr ive at 5403 2009 Traffic Study AiI`/�_ Tel. 802-864-0223 Fax. 802-864-0165 195310247 9/14120091 Stan www.stantec.com Airport Drive at the Employee Lot Employee Lot Airport Drive Airport Drive One Way Entering Northbound Left Thru Right Southbound Right Thru Left Lane Use �+ �► Overall LOS 2009 Volume (vph) 245 4 494 5 DHV HCM LOS A A A AM` Delay (sec) 0 0.1 Control Free Free 2009 Volume (vph) 561 560 1 DHV HCM LOS A A A PM" Delay (sec) 0 0.0 Control Free Free 2011 Volume (vph) 567 563 1 No Build HCM LOS A A A DHV Delay (sec) 0 0.0 Control Free Free 2011 Volume (vph) 567 586 1 Build ~ HCM LOS A A A DHV Oelay (sec) 0 0.0 Control Free Free 2016 Volume (vph) 582 575 1 No Build HCM LOS A A A DHV Delay (sec) 0 0.0 Control Free Free 2016 Volume (vph) 582 649 1 Build HCM LOS A A A DHV Delay (sec) 0 0.0 Control Free Free 2016 Build DHV Volume (vph) HCM LOS No Mitigation required due to project impact Delay (sec) Mitigated . AM volume adjusted to DHV per AM/ PM ratio. 2009 PM adjusted to DHV. South Burlington VermontStantec Consulting Services, Inc �` 55 Green Mountain Drive Synchro Analysis Results Summary South Burlington, VT ll S.A. Burlington Airport 5403 2009 Traffic Study Airport Drive at the Employee Lot Tel. 802-864 0223 Staintec Fax.802-864-0165 195310247 9/14/2009 www.stantec.com Airport Drive at Airport Entrance Airport Entrance Airport Drive Airport Drive One Way Entering Northbound Southbound Left Thru Right Right Thru Left Lane Use ? `r I Overall L LOS** 2009 Volume (vph) 264 67 493 39 A DHV HCM LOS A A A per AM* Delay (sec) 0 0 1 8.0 Airport Dr Control Free Free left 2009 Volume (vph) 629 130 545 91 A DHV HCM LOS A A A per PM* Delay (sec) 0 0 9.7 Airport Dr Control Free Free left 2011 Volume (vph) 636 132 545 93 No Build HCM LOS A A A per DHV Delay (see) 0 0 9.8 Airport Dr Control Free Free [Ott 2011 Volume (vph) 636 141 563 99 A HCM LOS A A A Build per DHV Delay (see) 0 0 9.9 Airport Dr Control Free Free left 2016 Volume (vph) _ 653 134 559 94 A No Build HCM LOS _ A A A per DHV Delay (see) 0 0 9.9 Airport Dr Control Free Free left 2016 Volume (vph) 653 165 611 116 Build HCM LOS A A B per DHV Delay (see) 0 0 10.2 Airport Dr Control Free Free left 2016 Volume (vph) Build HCM LOS No Mitigation required due to project impact. DHV Delay (see) Mitigated Control * AM volume adjusted to DHV per AM/ PM ratio. 2009 PM adjusted to DHV. ** Assume worse case approach for unsignalized intersection LOS South Burlington Vermon Stantec Consulting Services, Inc 55 Green Mountain Drive Synchro Analysis Results Summary V South Burlington. VT U.S.A. Burlington Airport 5403 2009 Traffic Study Airport Drive at Airport Entrance Stan}per Tel 802-864-0223 195310247 9/14/20091teC Fwww stantec.com Airport Drive at Airport Road Airport Road Driveway Airport Drive Airport Drive Eastbound Left Thru Right Westbound Left Thru Right Northbound Left Thru Right Southbound Right Thru Left Lane Use � Overall LOS** 2009 Volume (vph) 30 5 37 1 0 7 23 303 6 6 362 28 DHV AM* HCM LOS B B A A B per Airport Rd Delay (sec) 14.8 10.8 0.7 0.2 Control STOP STOP Free Free 2009 volume (vph) 76 1 31 2 1 4 44 658 6 2 500 80 DHV HCM LOS F C A A C r PM* Delay (see) 76.9 23.8 1.1 0.1 per Airport Rd Control STOP STOP Free Free 2011 volume (vph) 77 1 31 2 1 4 45 662 6 2 500 80 No Build HCM LOS F C A A F DHV Delay (sec) 80.4 24.0 1.2 0.1 per Airport Rd Control ST'-)P STOP Free Free 2011 Volume (vph) 78 1 3 2 1 4 45 672 6 2 515 83 Budd HCM LOS F C A A F DHV Delay (sac) 92.1 24.9 1.2 0.1 per Airport Rd Control STOP STOP Free Free 2016 No Build DHV Volume (vph) 79 1 32 2 1 4 46 680 6 2 513 82 F per Airport Rd HCM LOS F D A A Delay (see) 96.8 25.2 1.2 0.1 Control STOP STOP Free Free 2016 Volume (vph) 82 1 32 2 1 4 46 708 6 2 558 89 Build HCM LOS F D A A F DHV Delay (sec) 148 28.1 1.3 0.1 per Airport Rd Control STOP STOP Free Free 2016 Build DHV Volume (vph) HCM LOS No Mitigation required due to project impact Delay (sec) Mitigated Control * AM volume adjusted to DHV perAM/ PM ratio. 2009 PM adjusted to DHV. ** Assume worse case approach for unsignalized intersection LOS South Burlington Vermont ! --Stantec Consulting Services, Inc /(w 55 Green Mountain Drive Synchro Analysis Results Summary V South Burlington, yr u s A. Burlington Airport 5403 2009 Traffic Study Airport Drive at Airport Road 15" �p/' Tel 802-864-0223 195310247 9/14/2009 Stan tec www.stantec.com Williston Road (Route 2) at Airport Drive and Kennedy Drive Williston Road Williston Road Kennedy Drive Airport Drive Eastbound Left Thru Right Westbound Left Thru Right Northbound Left Thru Right Southbound Right Thru Left Lane Use —? S � t F* 1 Overall LOS 2009 Volume (vph) 15 528 315 219 493 103 203 163 205 9 245 168 DHV HCM LOS C C C C D D D D D C C AM* Delay (sec) 22 33 31 22 1 36 40 36 36 51 31 Signalized 2009 Volume (vph) 63 484 111 289 841 232 501 414 296 57 197 193 DHV HCM LOS C C C D F F D D D E E PM" Delay (sec) 26 32 35 39 220 133 40 36 41 56 Signalized 2011 Volume (vph) 64 489 112 292 850 234 506 417 299 57 197 193 No Build HCM LOS C C D D F F D D D E E DHV Delay (sec) 26 32 36 39 231 139 41 36 41 57 Signalized 2011 Volume (vph) 65 489 112 292 850 237 506 423 299 59 204 199 Build HCM LOS C C D D F F D D D E E DHV Delay (sec) 26 32 36 39 242 146 41 36 42 1 62 Signalized 2016 Volume (vph) 66 502 115 299 873 240 519 428 307 58 202 198 No Build HCM LOS C C D D F F D D D E F DHV Delay (sec) 26 32 39 39 265 157 42 37 43 64 Signalized 2016 Build Volume (vph) 69 502 115 299 873 249 519 444 307 64 222 217 F HCM LOS C C D D F F D D D F_ DHV Delay (sec) 27 32 39 40 298 176 43 37 44 85 Signalized 2016 Build DHV Volumo (vph) HCM LOS No Mitigation required due to project impact Delay (sec) Mltgated Signalized ` AM volume adjusted to DHV per AM/ PM ratio. 2009 PM adjusted to DHV. South Burlington Vermont Stantec Consulting Services, Inc 55 Green Mountain Drive Synchro Analysis Results Summary ('� South Burlington, VT U.S A Burlington Airport Williston Road (Route 2) at 5403 2009 Traffic Study Airport Drive and Kennedy Drive Tel.802-864-0223 Stantec Fwww.stantec 195310247 9/14/2009 com Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 3: Maryland Street & Airport Drive 9/15/2009 Lane Configurations 0- 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Vidih:``': x'' :'12 " 12 1'2''`S 163 16 16...,''1,6 ,. -`16, _,16'..,'16, Grade (%) 1% 0% 1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 6.0, ^.... 6.0 :5.0 6.( Lane Util Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0:85 1001`:00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd.�.Mlow (Prgt) .:198fi .. T777 2120 2142 At Permitted 0.76 1.00 0.99 1.00 Said. Flow(petm) 1583' 1777 2104 2142 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph)0 : `' 0 , 0'° � �270'` •`•0 106 9 574 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vpfi) ` - 0 0 > 0,' ` ` 270' `': ° < 6 31': 0. ;. 583 : 0' „ 0 ' - 381'' '.' 0 t-iea�Vehiclet: % ___ 0% 0% 0% 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% Turn Type Perm custom custom Perm' ?rccected Phases 4 2 6 Perrni,tted Phases 4 8- - 2 ?' Actuated Green, G (s) 12.6 12.6 18.3 18.3 Effective Green, g (s) ::: - _1-2 6 12.6 ; - , 1$:3 -18.3 Actuateo giC Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.43 0.43 ClearanceTire;(&) Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 465 522 888 ', ' 914 v/s Ratio Prot 0.18 vls Ftfio Perm, . .?';,`e0,17 0.02 c0 28 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.06 0.65 0.42 Uniform` Delaydj,;,.,_ 4; ., �12.9: 1.9 g " z> '' 9.8 J ,; ,,i:z. , ,u,; ;8.6 , a Progression Factor 1.00 . ,. 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ipere�riet)faiijlay,,d2 1.8, .` 0.0 ._S F<5 '.:1`,6 '..° ,.: ,, :., 0.3._ :. Delay (s) 14.7 ,. 10.9 . .'._ 11.4 .,_.. 8.9 Approach Delay (s) 0.0 13.7 11.4 8.9 HCM Average Control Delay 11.3 HCM Level pf Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 ACtU tad,G cle Leri th. s " 42.9 Sp ni of last,;tim' ' s Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis`'iPkod'(min) i li`"'':'°`' c Critical Lane Group 2016 Design Hour - Mitigated HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour Page 1 Burlington International Airport - Traffic Study Stantec 3: Maryland Street & Airport Drive 9/15/2009 ,(- -A r9m, Lane Group Flow (vph) 270 106 583 381 0,58 6.18, '-01,65 0.42 Control Delay 182 38 15.7 11.4 Queue Delay 0,0 AA 'tO.O 0.0 Total Delay 18.2 18 15.7 11.4 Queuel6n—gth 50th (ft) 52 0 1 w, Queue Length 95th (ft) 109 22 #251 141 tnt,,-r'na'l Unk"Dist (ft) '� - 155 _5 2 Turn Bay Length (ft) Oase,Qapacity (vp6)'-'-,`- 70b,, '-,;854 972 '.'990, 0 1 Starvation Cap Reduch, 0 0 0 0 Cap Reductn , 8PIR)o6k C- 0 '4 �'b � !", "IL,, Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced wIc Ratio 0,38 0A2 0.60 Q38' lnters6cfion turnmary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Oueue shown is maximum after two cycles. 2016 Design Hour - Mitigated Queues Evening Peak Hour Page 1 Stantec September 18, 2009 Page 4 of 6 Reference: Response to Comments on BTV 2009 Traffic Study 5. The airport plans to mitigate the garage expansion project impacts by the following measures: A. Payment to the City in the form of the Traffic Impact Fee as part of the approval process. B. Installation of traffic signal control signal at the Airport exit driveway intersection with Airport Drive when warranted. This is expected to occur prior to 2016. C. Participate in the determination of appropriate pedestrian crossing improvements along Airport Drive and their construction after construction of the parking garage. D. Identification of TDM measures in addition to the garage (which itself will reduce airport trips) by exploring and implementing some or all of the following, a. Provide public bus service between Montreal and the Burlington Airport. Current discussions propose offering three to four trips daily in both directions between downtown Montreal and the Burlington Airport Terminal. The tentative timeframe for beginning this service is during t`:e first quarter of 2010. b. Utilize off -site parking areas and provide shuttle service to and from the Airport. Six sites have been identified that would work because of proximity to Airport and access to 1-89. At this time these sites have not been negotiated for use with owners, so specific information is not yet available. c. The Airport is also very interested in working with the State and town as plans progress for a new park -and -ride facility in Williston. d. Increase Chittenden County bus service to the Airport, especially during peak periods of Airport use. e. Consolidate hotel shuttle service, Le one shuttle could serve several hotels. f. Revise the Airport's parking fee structure to encourage off -site parking in association with shuttle lot availability. g. Relocate rental car companies to off -site locations. 6. The intersection of Williston Road and Airport Road lies just outside the study area. Its operation has been reviewed and discussed with Vtrans when scoping the study area. In that respect a qualitative analysis has been conducted at this intersection. Stantec September 18, 2009 Page 5 of 6 Reference: Response to Comments on BTV 2009 Traffic Study The inclusion of this intersection was considered but judged unnecessary because this intersection is not a concern under existing conditions. The Route 2 corridor study prepared for the CCMPO omitted this intersection. Traffic counts by the CCMPO and Vtrans are routinely conducted at intersections where there is public concern. There are no historical counts at this intersection. Stantec has observed that left turns into Airport Road are facilitated by the two lane Route 2 roadway and the signal operation at Airport Drive provides gaps in the opposing traffic flow. Left turns from Airport Road are prohibited. Based on the minimal potential for airport traffic impact Stantec has not conducted a detailed analysis. Other future scenarios including the construction of Exit 12B as has been discussed and conceptually studied by the CCMPO may change the operation of this intersection. If Exit 12B was a programmed project it would be a required element of the BTV traffic Study; however, that is not so. Considering the scope and operational implications of the Exit 12B project, further study of that project must include the Williston Road and Airport Road intersection for a more future :design y;ar than that of this traffic study. An extension of Airport Drive has been discussed for some time. The combination of realigning Airport Parkway and Extension of Airport Drive was in included as one of seven alternatives for improved airport access prepared for The CCMPO in a 2002 study. This Airport Drive Extension alternative is presently one of those being considered as part of the Airport Master Plan update which is being prepared separately from the garage permitting process. As envisioned, the Airport Road extension would reduce traffic on White Street. That reduction would principally relate to commuter traffic and some local airport traffic traveling to/ from Route 15. 8. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures to reduce airpor~ ±rffic are being considered by BTV. In addition to the those items listed in response #5, these include: A. Pedestrian access along and across Airport Drive is supported by the airport. The safety / adequacy of four existing crossings have been reviewed by Stantec for the airport with the City planning staff. During a recent field visit the four existing crossings were identified, their physical elements and deficiencies were inventoried and their locations appraised for continued use. This assessment and recommendations are provided on the attached concept plan. B. As the garage effectively reduces the number of trips generated by the airport, the garage itself represents a TDM measure. Today airport patrons must plan their trips with the knowledge that the garage could potentially be full. In some instances this can be expected to result in drop-off / pick-up trips. A minimum of four trips results and perhaps more if these vehicles get into the looping circulation pattern on the loop road and Airport Drive. With the additional garage spaces, airport users are more likely to park their vehicle on arrival and drive away upon their return. (two trips). StanteC September 18, 2009 Page 6 of 6 Reference: Response to Comments on BTV 2009 Traffic Study 9. The safety of pedestrian crossings has been reviewed in the field. An attached concept plan documents the field review and recommendations. BFJ Buckhurst Fish & Jacquemart Inc. 115 5th Avenue New York, NY 10003 Tel (212) 353-7474 Fax (212) 353-7494 Memorandum To: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer, City of South Burlington From: Georges Jacquemart, P.E.,AICP Tel (212) 353 7477 Email g.jacquemort@bfjplanning.com Alirezo Rabiee Tel (212) 353 7486 Email a.robiee@bfjplanning.com Subject: Review of Burlington International Airport 2009 Traffic Study Date. September 10, 2009 We hove reviewed the June 19, 2009 report by Stantec on the Burlington ir-te!national Airport " offic Siudy regarding the proposed parking expansion and future growd). 'We have the following comments: 1. Aciording to the Campbell & Paris Engineers forecast letter dated Janua!y 2009 on the B(.rjington international Airport (in the Study Appendix), the Burlington, Airport (L:TV) rod a 6.77% annual growth in enplonements from 2000 to 2007. Between 2007 and 2008 total enplanements increased by 7.84%. The some firm analyzes three different forecasting methods for the future and recommends a forecast method based on BTV's market share change in relation to the total regional market. This means an average annual growth rate for 5.3% from 2008 to 2030. The 5.3% annual growth is considered as an intermediate growth pattern, above the low growth forecast and below the high forecast. Stantec used a 3.2% enplanement growth rate. This seems to l,e On the low side. 2. Traffic Impact Methodology: Stantec used the 3.2% p.a. increase in enplonements to calculate the additional traffic generation for the airport. We recommend an alternative method to test the impacts of the parking capacity that is proposed to be added. The traffic consultant should calculate the trip generation rate per space of the existing parking garage and then apply this rate to the proposed additional parking spaces to estimate the additional traffic due to the parking expansions. The resulting traffic generation should be compared to the projected enplanement increase methodology (but with a growth rate that is higher than 3.2%). The consultant should then do the traffic impact analysis with the highest traffic generation. 3. It does not seem logical that inbound and outbound traffic distributions are different. The consultant should correct this or explain why the incoming and outgoing volumes in the directional distribution diagram (Figure 6) are different. 4. The traffic consultant should show LOS (Level of Service) and delay by lane group for each intersection and for existing, future no -build, future build and future build with mitigation scenarios so that the impacts can be clearly evaluated. 5. The traffic consultant should summarize mitigation measures clearly and explain when each measure should to be implemented. 6. The intersection of Williston Road and Airport Road should be analyzed as well. 7. The traffic consultant should discuss the extension of Airport Drive to mitigate traffic impacts along White Street and in the residential neighborhood. Traffic volumes along Ray Belair, Administrative Officer January 10, 2009 Pane 2 White Street exceed the daily volumes that are normally considered as reasonable for a residential street (Source: Livable Streets, by Donald Appleyard). 8. The traffic consultant should assess potential TDM programs to reduce airport traffic, such as shuttle services. 9. The traffic consultant should assess the safety of the pedestrian crossings along Airport Drive. Please let us know if you have any questions regarding this review. - Li `I �-- -r �yrn �603 �lr+l aad Ij Fj _Zj J _ Y AYl4#Yy — b ^bM��"✓1 ❑ F1 El U BFJ Buckhurst Fish & Jacquemart Inc. 1 15 5th Avenue New York, NY 10003 Tel (212) 353-7474 Fax (212) 353-7494 Memorandum To: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer, City of South Burlington From: Georges Jacquemart, P.E., AICP Tel (212) 353 7477 Email g.jacquemart@bfiplanning.com Alireza Rabiee Tel (212) 353 7486 Email a.rabiee@bfiplanning.com Subject: Response to comments on the BFJ Review of Burlington International Airport 2009 Traffic Study Date: September 22, 2009 We have reviewed the September 17, 2009 memo by Stantec on the BFJ Review of Burlington International Airport Traffic Study. We still have the following comments and questions: The Campbell & Paris Engineers forecast letter elated January 2009 recommends the market share forecast methodology corresponding to the medium forecast (see page 5 under the title "4. Recommended Forecast"). The total 2008 enplanements from BTV is 762,852 and the medium scenario forecasts 1,616,400 enplanements for the year 2030. This results in a 3.5% annual enplanement increase (compounded). The FAA letter dated March 3, 2009 approved the Campbell & Paris study in general without mentioning any specific ratios. It should be noted that there are other airport traffic sources that have not be included in the analysis, such as the employee parking lot, the airport facility lot and various P&R lots and car rental lots. These traffic sources will also grow over the next few years, presumably at the some rate as enplanements. Besides the two main access roads there are about six other driveways along Airport Drive, plus Aviation Avenue that generate airport traffic. The traffic study submitted by the applicant does therefore not take into consideration the growth of the entire airport. 2. We disagree with the position of Stantec regarding the methodology issue. This application is for the expansion of the parking garage at the airport, not for the approval of the Airport Master Plan. If the parking garage could not be expanded, travelers may chose other access modes, or would park off -site and traffic volumes would not be as high as with the larger garage. Whereas there is no simple and 100%-correct methodology to predict traffic volumes at an airport, it is reasonable to relate traffic volumes to parking capacity, and test the traffic impacts on that basis. We assume that as the airport grows and the garage expands the nature of the traffic in and out of the garage (short-term, long-term and rental cars) remains the same, as all these components will increase in a similar manner. Therefore the traffic generation rates will tend to remain the same. If that is not the case the consultant can adjust the rates accordingly. We recommend that the adjacent intersections along Airport Drive be tested on that basis. Ray Belair, Administrative Officer September 22, 2009 Page 2 3. The diagram s below shows existing AM and PM peak hour volumes at the airport entrance and exit drives with Airport Road. As can be seen traffic to and from the north is generally in the 40% range (37% to 44%) except for the PM outbound movement. We recommend a new count at the Airport Drive and Exit Drive during PM peak hour or the traffic consultant should explain the discrepancy. AM Peak Hour I L,,," -44%) Exit Dr rM41 E56%) 0 a , 3 1 E 37%) Ent�•_:n_eb� r 16.%) PM Peak Hour 67 128%) 6 tAt C?r. 0 17 - E 72%) 3 Entic:rn_�Di r4,59%) 4. The Stantec analysis shows that the intersection of Route 2 (Williston Road) and Airport Road will be operating at LOS F in future conditions, compared to today's LOS D. More traffic will be using Airport Road to avoid the congested intersection. We think the intersection of Williston Road and Airport Road should be analyzed. 5. The conceptual pedestrian improvement on Airport Drive prepared by Stantec dated September 15, 2009 should be integrated into the plan. Also a similar safety crossing assessment should be undertaken along Airport Circle. 6. The Airport Drive Expansion will be utilized as a connecting corridor between Airport Circle and the Airport Parkway Valet Parking Lot and also a connection between Route 2 and Route 15. The traffic consultant has to evaluate any possible additional trip due to this expansion. 7. The intersection of Route 2 and Airport Drive in the future conditions will be operating at LOS F during the PM peak hour. This impact needs to be mitigated. We recommend the traffic consultant to evaluate the following alternatives at this intersection: a. Changing in northbound lane configurations (adding an extra left -turning lane) b. Roundabout at Route 2 and Airport Drive Please let us know if you have any questions regarding this review. P� BFJ Buckhurst Fish & Jacquemart Inc. 115 5th Avenue New York, NY 10003 Tel (212) 353-7474 Fax (212) 353-7494 Memorandum To: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer, City of South Burlington From: Georges Jacquemart, P.E., AICP Tel (212) 353 7477 Email g.jacquemart@bfjplanning.com Alireza Rabiee Tel (212) 353 7486 Email a.rabiee@bfjplanning.com Subject: Response to comments on the BFJ Review of Burlington International Airport 2009 Traffic Study Date: November 2, 2009 We have reviewed the October 26, 2009 memo by Stantec responding to the BFJ comments on the BTV 2009 Traffic Study in the September 22, 2009 memo and also the October 14, 2009 conference call. We have the following comments: 1. Stantec did the requested traffic generation analysis based on the additional 1,370 parking spaces. The calculations show 93 additional PM peak -hour trips based on the additional parking capacity methodology in comparison to the125 additional trips using the enplanement growth methodology. However Stantec assumed that 100% of the additional parking spaces would be assigned to the public users and none to the rental agencies. This affects the resulting traffic generation of the new garage. It means that the expected growth of the car rental agencies occurs somewhere off -airport. This has not been taken into consideration. If we assume that the rental agency activities increase in the same manner as the garage capacity or in other words we assume one combined traffic generation rate, the additional generation will be higher. See the table below summarizing the calculations. Existing Traffic Generation of BTV Garage Public Car Rentals Total Spaces 1,652 308 1,960 Traffic Inbound Outbound 32 39 71 80 55 135 Total 112 94 206 Traffic Generation Rates Inbound Outbound 0.019 0.048 0.127 0.179 0.036 0.069 Total 0.067 0.306 0.105 Ray Belair, Administrative Officer November 2, 2009 Page 2 Additional Traffic Generation With 1,370 Additional Public Spaces Traffic Inbound Outbound 28 66 Total 94 Additional Traffic Generation With 1,370 Additional Public and Car -Rental Spaces (in some proportion as todayl Traffic Inbound Outbound 50 94 Total 144 Original Stantec traffic Generation Traffic Inbound Outbound 53 72 Total 125 Comparing the 144 total vehicles with the 125 total vehicles from the original study report we conclude to that 19 more vehicles are generated by the Airport. Based on the vehicular turning movement data there are 72% left -turning vehicles at the airport exit to Airport drive and 86% of south -bound vehicles make a through movement at the intersection of Airport Drive with Airport Road. This means that with the rental car growth we would add 12 more vehicles to the intersection of Williston Road and Airport Drive. The table below shows the traffic volumes at the intersection of Williston Road and Airport Drive. PM Peak Hour Total Intersection Volume Airport Volume % Airport 2008 Design Hour Volume 3,650 3,880 230 3,892 242 385 490 105 502 117 11 % 13% 46% 13% 48% 2016 Design Hour Volume- Build Stantec Additional Traffic 2016-2008 Stantec 2016 Design Hour Volume- Build BFJ Additional Traffic 2016-2008 BFJ As can be seen of the total traffic added to the 2008 Design Hour Volumes the airport traffic represents 48% (taking into considerations the car rental growth). If we assume that today the intersection operates at its limit and does not need a major improvement, the airport should bear 48% of the cost of any major improvements. 2. Stantec should analyze a single -lane roundabout at the Airport Exit driveway as a mitigation measure, as it was discussed in the October 14 conference call. Given the character of the surrounding neighborhood, we feel that the roundabout is a better solution (safer and more attractive). Ray Belair, Administrative Officer November 2, 2009 Paae 3 3. Stantec should explain what commitments the Airport will make towards each TDM measure. 4. Stantec should explain what kind of commitment the Airport can make at this stage towards the Airport drive extension. Please let us know if you have any questions regarding this review. Memo 0 Stantec To: Ray Belair, , From: David DeBaie Administrative Officer John Leinwohl City of South Burlington Stantec Consulting Services 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel: 802-864-0223 Fax: 802-864-0165 File:195310247 Date: November 10, 2009 Reference: Response to November 2, 2009 BFJ Comments on BTV 2009 Traffic Study and Prior Response letters This memo provides responses to the attached November 2, 2009 comment letter from Buckhurst Fish & Jacquemart Inc.(BFJ) regarding the BTV 2009 Traffic Study. 1. Trip Generation /Additional Trips through Williston Road / Mitigation Responsibility A. On behalf of the airport, Stantec accepts the BFJ calculation of 94 additional peak hour trips with 1,370 additional public spaces. Note the following: o According to the airport management, no new spaces will be allotted to rental car company use. In the future, existing rental car parking will be relocated offsite. o The airport is willing to accept a 308-space limit for rental car spaces in the garage as a condition of the garage expansion approval. B. Consistent with the BFJ calculation of 94 additional peak hour trips generated by the garage expansion, the following tables detail the garage expansion generated increase of 57 peak hour trips through the Williston Road and Airport Drive intersection. One Team. Infinite Solutions_ djd v,\1953\active\195310247\aviabon\memo\btvresponse to bfj comments 111009.doc Stantec November 10, 2009 Page 2 of 5 Reference: Response to November 2, 2009 BFJ Comments on BTV 2009 Traffic Study Table 1 Additional PM Peak Hour Airport Vehicle Trips Through Williston Road/ Airport Drive Intersection Generated by the Proposed Gargage Expansion Entering Exiting Total Total Generated 28 66 94* Percent Through Intersection 52% 63% 63% Peak Hour Trips Through Intersection 15 42 57 * Per BFJ memo dated November 2, 2009 with comments on BTV 2009 traffic Study Table 2 Percent Airport Traffic Through Williston Road / Airport Drive Per BTV 2009 Per BFJ PM Peak Hour Volume Traffic Study Calculation 2016 Design Hour - No Build 3,807 Additional Airport Trips generated by Garage Expansion 73 57 2016 Design Hour - Build 3,880 Airport Trips 503 vph 503 -16 = 487 vph Airport Trips Percentage 13 % 13 % C. The proportion of the cost to improve the Williston Road / Airport Drive Intersection for which the airport is responsible is no more than 13 percent. BFJ identifies that the airport share is 48 percent of the improvement cost; however, the basis of the proportion is invalid. Similar to the City's traffic impact fee calculation, development responsibility does not include existing deficiencies or future deficiencies under No Build condition. The following should be noted: o Under 2009 PM Peak Hour No Build Conditions, the intersection of Williston Road / Airport Drive operates overall at LOS E with the Stantec November 10, 2009 Page 3 of 5 Reference: Response to November 2, 2009 BFJ Comments on BTV 2009 Traffic Study southbound approach also operating at LOS E which exceeds the City's design standard of LOS D ( per the Road Impact Fee). o Under 2016 PM peak Hour No Build Conditions, the intersection of Williston Road / Airport Drive operates overall at LOS F with the southbound approach operating at LOS E. o The Planned transportation improvement projects included as the basis for the City's Road Impact Fees as stated on page 17 of the 2007 traffic impact fee analysis includes "Widen and Reconstruct Williston Road from Dorset Street to the Williston border". o Based on the inclusion of the intersection within the described project boundaries, any specific assessment is credited toward the impact fee. o The percentage of the project cost for the widening and reconstruction of Williston Road from Dorsett Street to the Williston border which relates specifically to the Airport Drive intersection is unknown. 2. During the October 14, 2009 conference call, a single lane roundabout was discussed to accommodate the Airport Exit intersection with Airport Drive. At this time the feasibility of this improvement is summarized in the following analysis: A. Essentially good operation can be expected when the combination of conflicting hourly volumes are less than 1,100 to 1,300 vehicles per hour. Under the 2016 design hour condition the greatest conflicting volume would include 583 northbound vehicles on Airport Drive and approximately 376 exiting vehicles which total 959 vph. This analysis indicates that good operation can be expected with a roundabout. There are other planning considerations for the airport. B. Consistent with the consideration of a traffic signal, the implementation should not necessarily be predicated on the operation during the peak hour but rather the operation through the day. It is critical to note that only airport traffic is delayed at this intersection and within the City right of way Level of Service A with essentially no delay is experienced even during the peak hour. C. With the introduction of a traffic signal, Airport Drive traffic will experience delays of 9 to11 seconds during the peak hour. Delays with a roundabout will be experienced by all vehicles on Airport Drive but the average delay will be similarly equates to LOS A. D. The airport does not own the property required on the west side of Airport Drive that would be required for a roundabout. Stantec November 10, 2009 Page 4of5 Reference: Response to November 2, 2009 BFJ Comments on BTV 2009 Traffic Study E. A roundabout at the existing Airport Exit will unnecessarily complicate the operation of the future White Street and Airport Drive Extension intersection. F. In the future, the Airport Exit may be relocated opposite White Street. G. The cost of a roundabout will be significantly greater than a traffic signal. Rough estimates are $400,000 versus $200,000. H. At the October 14, 2009 conference call the airport stated a willingness to bond the traffic signal improvement through the year 2020 to assure to provide greater assurance that if the necessary Airport Drive growth occurs later the bonding will remain. I. As part of the ongoing Master Planning efforts, the Airport commits to considering the control of the Airport Exit with a roundabout. 3. The airport commits to mitigate the garage expansion project impacts by employing Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures to reduce the vehicle trips to the airport. The following measures are being considered and the airport commits to filing an annual report on the airport's findings in examining their cost effectiveness and the advancement of measures found sufficiently effective to be implemented: A. Construct pedestrian crossing improvements along Airport Drive estimated at $30,000 after construction of the parking garage. B. Provide public bus service between Montreal and the Burlington Airport. Current discussions propose offering three to four trips daily in both directions between downtown Montreal and the Burlington Airport Terminal. The estimated cost to initiate this service is $100,000. C. Utilize off -site parking areas and provide shuttle service to and from the Airport. Seven sites have been identified which are close to the airport and access to 1-89. At this time, these sites have not been negotiated for use with owners, so specific information is not yet available. D. Work with the State, CCMPO, CCTA and the town to support a new park - and -ride facility in Williston. E. Increase Chittenden County bus service to the Airport, especially during peak periods of Airport use. F. Consolidate hotel shuttle service (one shuttle could serve several hotels). Stantec November 10, 2009 Page 5of5 Reference: Response to November 2, 2009 BFJ Comments on BTV 2009 Traffic Study G. Relocate rental car companies to off -site locations. At this time existing agreement do not allow this. H. Provide for short term parking that reduces the volume of circulating vehicles on Airport Circle and Airport Drive. This would include: parking fee structure attractive to short term parking; a nearby "cell phone" lot. 4. An extension of Airport Drive has been discussed for some time; however it is not proposed at the present time. The combination of realigning Airport Parkway and Extension of Airport Drive was in included as one of seven alternatives for improved airport access prepared for The CCMPO in a 2002 study. This Airport Drive Extension alternative is presently one of those being considered as part of the Airport Master Plan update which is being prepared separately from the garage permitting process. As envisioned, the Airport Road extension would reduce traffic on White Street. That reduction would principally relate to commuter traffic and some local airport traffic traveling to/ from Route 15. B FJ Buckhurst Fish & Jacquemart Inc. 115 5th Avenue New York, NY 10003 Tel (212) 353-7474 Fax (212) 353-7494 Memorandum To: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer, City of South Burlington Paul Conner, Director of Planning and Zoning, City of South Burlington From: Georges Jacquemart, P.E., AICP Tel (212) 353 7477 Email g.jacquemort@bfjplanning.com Alireza Rabiee Tel (212) 353 7486 Email. a.rabiee@bfjplanning.com Subject: Summary Review of Burlington International Airport 2009 Traffic Study Date: November 24, 2009 Following several memos and phone conversations related to the traffic impacts of the proposed garage expansion, we wanted to summarize our conclusions: 1. Traffic Generation: Originally the applicant prepared a traffic impact study based on an annual growth of the airport traffic. We asked that the applicant verify this method by determining the per space traffic generation of the existing garage and applying it to the garage expansion. The applicant performed this analysis. Depending on the assumptions regarding the growth of the car rental agencies, the traffic generation estimates were either higher or lower than the original estimate. The lower traffic generation calculation is based on the assumption that the car rental growth would occur outside of the garage and the immediate airport property. We conclude that the original calculation based on a percent annual growth of 3.47% yields a reasonable traffic (not the 3.2% used by Stantec) generation number, and should be used for further impact evaluation and mitigation. We used Stantec's observed traffic volumes for the PM peak traffic (item 4.3.1 of Stantec report dated June 19, 2009) of 187 entering and 249 exiting vehicles and applied the 3.47% annual growth to calculate an increased traffic generation of 137 vehicles (59 entering and 78 exiting vehicles) for the year 2016. 2. Traffic Impacts at Williston/Kennedy Drive intersection This intersection operates at LOS E today, and is expected to deteriorate to LOS F in the future. Given that LOS D is considered as an acceptable upper limit for operational purposes, any traffic volumes above that threshold should be responsible for capacity improvements needed to alleviate capacity shortfalls. The diagram below illustrates that calculation. Ray Belair, Administrative Officer November 24, 2009 Page 2 Total Traffic ova Airport Add. Inters. Increas Airport Volume s Thru. Airport Traffic e Traffic volumes Int. 6; .' 39 77 257 12.6% 493 108 pp� 2008 3650 292 10.5% 385 31 DHV LOS D 3358 --- 10.5% 354 --- Volumes 549 25.3% 139 above LOS D BFJ estimated that the LOS D threshold for the intersection occurs with a load of 3358 vehicles. With the background growth and the new airport generation (its percentage going through the Williston Road intersection) the future total load will be 3907. Of that total 493 vehicles will be airport vehicles (385 or 10.5% of 3650 plus 108 added by the airport growth). Of the volumes above the LOS D threshold the airport traffic represents 25.3% (139/549). The applicant should identify the improvements needed at this intersection to bring the 2016 Build Volumes back to LOS D, and should estimate the costs for these improvements. The airport would be responsible for 25.3% of these costs. 3. Intersection of Airport Drive and Airport Exit Under the existing controls of this intersection (stop signs for exiting traffic only) the only vehicles that suffer increased delays are the airport exiting vehicles. Traffic along Airport Drive will operate satisfactorily as long as the existing controls don't change. It will be the responsibility of the airport to initiate an improvement and to pay for it. As the Master Plan for the airport evolves this exit may move to another location. A roundabout should be considered as an alternative for this intersection, since roundabouts are safer, more attractive and more fluid compared to signalized intersections. The City will have to approve any changes to this intersection. 4. Airport Garage Amenities Ray Belair, Administrative Officer November 24, 2009 Paae 3 In addition to the pedestrian crossing improvements previously discussed, we recommend that the applicant install secure and prominent bicycle racks inside the garage for use by the employees and passengers. These racks should be under 24-hour CCTV surveillance and/or in direct view of the garage attendants. Please let us know if you have any questions regarding this review. BFJ Buckhurst Fish & Jacquemart Inc. 115 5th Avenue New York, NY 10003 Tel (212) 353-7474 Fax (212) 353-7494 Memorandum To: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer, City of South Burlington Paul Conner, Director of Planning and Zoning, City of South Burlington From: Georges Jacquemart, P.E., AICP Tel (212) 353 7477 Email g.jacquemart@bfjplanning.com Alireza Rabiee Tel (212) 353 7486 Email a.rabiee@bfjplanning.com Subject: Response to comments on the BFJ memo on Burlington International Airport 2009 Traffic Study Date: December 10, 2009 We have reviewed the December 10, 2009 memo by Stantec responding to the BFJ comments on the BTV 2009 Traffic Study in the November 24, 2009 memo. We have the following comments: Stantec agreed with the more appropriate annual growth rate of 3.47% and the resultant PM peak -hour traffic generation increase of 137 vehicles, but the analyses for the Route 2 and Airport Drive alternative intersection conditions (No Build and Build) are based on the 3.2% growth rate. The build condition analyses in the three alternatives need to be revised. We estimate that at least for one of the three improvement alternatives the LOS will change from D to E (the No Build delay for Alternative B is 54.5 seconds, half a second below the LOS E limit). We reaffirm our recommendation that the cost of an intersection improvement should be borne by that amount of traffic that creates the need for the improvement, i.e. the traffic that is above the threshold of LOS D, the acceptable limit for traffic delays. The airport's fair share contribution towards the improvement of the intersection of Williston Road and Airport Drive should therefore not be based on the percent of total airport traffic in relation to the total traffic going through that intersection, but should be calculated in relation to the amount of traffic that actually generates the need for the improvement, i.e. the volumes above LOS D threshold. This is the same logic that is used when traffic impact fees are calculated: the costs of the improvements are spread over the developments that create the need for the improvements i.e. the new traffic, or the traffic volumes above the LOS D limit. In this case that percentage would be 25.3%. • The cost estimate should take the land acquisition (Right Of Way) costs into consideration. Please let us know if you have any questions regarding this review. Memo DAr Stantec To: Ray Belair, , From: David DeBaie Administrative Officer John Leinwohl City of South Burlington Stantec Consulting Services 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel: 802-864-0223 Fax: 802-864-0165 File:195310247 Date: December 10, 2009 Reference: Response to November 24, 2009 BFJ Comments on BTV 2009 Traffic Study and Prior Response letters This memo provides responses to the attached November 24, 2009 comment letter from Buckhurst Fish & Jacquemart Inc. (BFJ) regarding the BTV 2009 Traffic Study and prior response to comment letters 1. Traffic Generation — We concur with the more appropriate annual growth rate of 3.47 percent and the resultant PM peak hour trip increase of 137 vehicles. 2. Traffic Impacts at Williston / Kennedy Drive Intersection : A. We agree that the analysis indicates the intersection operates at LOS E today and is expected to deteriorate to LOS F during the PM peak hour under 2016 No Build condition. B. We assert that if improvements needed to meet LOS D are made, and the project generated trips are added, the Level of Service does not drop and there is no requirement for additional mitigation. This is demonstrated by an attached summary of three alternative improvement measures which were initially identified in the Traffic Impact Study. (These alternative improvement measures are intended to be representative of the effect of improving the intersection. This effort is not a substitute for the scoping study process involving the City, the CCMPO, VTrans and all other stakeholders.) C. This summary entitled "Route 2 and Airport Drive Alternative Intersection Improvements, Performance, and Costs" affirms that the needed measures One Team. Infinite Solutions. djd v:\1953\active\195310247\awation\memo\btvresponse to bfj comments 120909 doc Stantec December 9, 2009 Page 2 of 2 Reference: Response to November 24, 2009 BFJ Comments on BTV 2009 Traffic Study to improve the intersection to LOS D will also accommodate the additional airport peak period traffic without the need for additional mitigation. D. The summary further offers an opinion of cost for a representative set of improvements to provide LOS D. The average cost is $460,000. E. We do not agree with the assignment of responsibility for mitigation to the project as a traffic impact because these conditions are not the result of the proposed project; therefore, the required mitigation to improve the operation to LOS D is not the responsibility of the project proponent. F. We further do not agree with the BFJ method that identifies the airport to be 25.3 percent responsible for the improvements. As noted in the traffic impact study, airport traffic through this intersection amounts to no more than 13 percent of the PM peak hour intersection volume. For this reason, we assert that an assessment of the airport's fair share cost to improve the intersection should not exceed 13 percent. G. To effect some of these improvements, additional ROW will likely be required. In particular it appears that ROW will be required on the northeast corner which is owned by the City of Burlington, Burlington International Airport. The actual required acreage and value of the required property is yet to be determined. The airport may be willing to contribute this land for the purpose of intersection improvements in lieu of other impact assessments. 3. Airport Garage Amenities — The airport will consider the inclusion of bicycle racks inside the garage as suggested. Route 2 and Airport Drive Alternative Intersection Improvements, Performance, and Costs Alternate A Alternate B Alternate C NB Left Lane 300 feet) NB Shared Left/ Thru Lane (300 feet) SB Receiving Lane ( 200 feet) IWB NB Left lane (300 feet) Right Lane ( 250 feet) NB Thrus added to Right Lane SB Receiving Lane (200 feet) SB Shared Right/Thru,Thru/Left NB Receiving widening (100 feet) PERFORMANCE 2016 No Build DHV Level of Service LOS D LOS D LOS D 2016 Build DHV Level of Service LOS D LOS D LOS D OPINION OF COST Units Unit Price Amount Cost Note Amount Cost Note Amount Cost Note Excavation CY $15 1150 $17,250 1250 $18,750 1600 $24,000 Curbing LF $30 1050 $31,500 1150 $34,500 1100 $33,000 Sidewalk SY $60 0 $0 0 $0 280 $16,800 Drainage Adjustment LF $50 1050 $52,500 1150 $57,500 1100 $55,000 Retaining Wall 12 ft) LF $400 0 $0 0 $0 300 $120,000 Landscape LS $20,000 1 $20,000 1 $20,000 1 $20,000 Traffic Signal Adjust LS $50,000 1 $50,000 A 1 $50,000 A 1 $50,000 A Utility Relocation LS $30,000 1 $30,000 B 1 $30,000 B 1 $30,000 B Pavement TONS $85 420 $35,700 C 450 $38,250 C 490 $41,650 C Subbase CY $30 950 $28,500 1000 $30,000 1100 $33,000 SUBTOTAL $265,450 $279,000 $423,450 Contingency @ 25% $66,363 $69,750 $105,863 TCP 10% $33,181 D $34,8751 D $52,931 D Const. Admin @ 5% $13,273 $13,9501 1 $21,173 TOTAL 1 $378,2661 E $397,575 E 1 $603,416 E NOTES A. 2 Strain poles & Disturbed Detection B. 2 Poles Relocated C. No Overlay ( Resurfacing in 2012) Average Alternative Cost D. 10% ( Subtotal + 25% Contingency) E. ROW / Scoping / Design/ Permits Not Included $460,000 195310247 BTV Garage Expansion Traffic Impact Study STANTEC 12/09/09 -Iros •�'-� `�� -' � _ ors• / f' 3� yr_ �'�' _ R. ' ? �' t per'= zz <'` S ��� 1. .� ,, i 3; a 1 _ '=fi6r, k�.,rs•. ,�Yy.+'•.,s s,j .... ° ` i I s 't 'S NOTE: PARCEL AND JLO-W- BOUNDAMES ONFAINED FROM PUBLIC an DATA souRCES ` . • 3VS+ ' ��1 cif. , /f 1 ZS Alternate A 1. NB Left Turn Lane added (3001) 2. NB Thrus added to Right Lane RON ✓'''£ si ''t:" AND 0 SHOWN FOR NFORINATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. Burlington International AIrpo.,. r ,~ •tj n , 0 so 100 Route 2 & Airport Drive SCALE Intersection Improvements _. ,.. '� � _ sue"✓ e.. j � -� ', t • - .fit _ - ^'TS fx. z• 'T .'�' •�a ��•N'+t- Ort � f. � Q♦ .I � t! -I`-. - �._- „ ter-._ .�,r�� .•.rW� .. w-7i�. ,�• ,.�" ,t T .i». -�QA . a.--�,`•�.4'''s`.'. Y.-a«.A;i i,�.. ,Fly .''114r _ , aw . .. s An Burlington International Airport SCALE Intersection Improvements ♦ �i' =fir. '�` ;F„ � As A�� ., ,. a �•�z'. �� � � <"'xa .r:� •x': 1 ,z; s Vic'~'" - �.-�..�h �� _ - 1 1 J � • x� _ s � .t � rj. �C 3 Qrr��►7~T"' '� 1. • ',yN % .,,���,�� • • <,� i, is , wt . \ � • � �;. � Nye` 4,w 00 LL KRA 4 `Alternate C �E ? �! f' 500' SIDEWALK # _: RELOCATION =R�=�I. NB Left Lane added 3001) r NOTE: PAMM AND LO.W. SOUNDAMES OlTjUNED FROM PUBUC Gig DATA SOURCES AND IS SHOWN FOR INFOMMONAL PURPOSES ONLY. o` t FLU 3i 'Burlington International Intersection Improvements SCALE Ua &„ IA M'!&T X Y-3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis STANTEC 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 12WO09 er►tent ( EBL. EBT� t9R, , ME UV §T WBR N L � 'NO, , `NBR . � 5BL . SBT� SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 66 502 115 299 873 240 519 428 307 198 202 58 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 10 11 12 10 11 12 10 9 10 9 10 13 Grade (%) -1 % 2% 1 % -1 % Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1,00 1,00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1676 3375 1651 3310 3188 2971 1616 1765 1661 Fit Permitted 0.15 1.00 0,19 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 261 3375 323 3310 3188 2971 1480 1765 1661 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 66 502 115 299 873 240 519 428 307 198 202 58 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 16 0 0 20 0 0 106 0 0 0 50 Lane Group Flow (vph) 66 601 0 299 1093 0 519 629 0 198 202 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 33.2 27.0 51.5 39.3 21.3 25.9 15.7 15.7 15.7 Effective Green, g (s) 33.2 27.0 51.5 39,3 21.3 25.9 15.7 15,7 15.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.24 0.47 0.36 0.19 0.23 0.14 0.14 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6,0 6,0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 158 826 374 1179 616 698 224 251 236 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.18 c0.13 c0.33 0.16 c0.21 c0.09 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.24 0.04 0,00 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.73 0.80 0.93 0.84 0.90 0,88 0.80 0.03 Uniform Delay, d1 29.3 38.3 21.7 34.1 42.9 41.0 46.3 46.8 40.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 3.2 11.4 12.3 10.2 14.9 31.0 16.9 0.1 Delay (s) 31.1 41.5 33.1 46.4 53.1 55.8 77.3 62.7 40.8 Level of Service C D C D D E E E D Approach Delay (s) 40.5 43.6 54.7 66.3 Approach LOS D D D E E HCM Average Control Delay 49.4 HCM Level of Service { D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 %..0 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.3 Sum of lost time (s) 24.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.1 % ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2016 No Build DHV w improvements Synchro 7 - Report NO Build NB Left and thru right shared NS Lead lag (ALT A) Page 1 R No6r.:U %a/Al-T A s, Queues STANTEC 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 12/9/2009 --* -,, i-{--'� fi Lane Group EBL,--EB'T-:'_.,.WBL, Wf[T ', AOL' .NET , SBL SET., S8R Lane Group Flow (vph) 66 617 299 1113 519 735 198 202 58 v/c Ratio 0,35 0.75 0.79 0.90 0.82 0.90 0,86 0.78 0.20 Control Delay 24.2 43.9 37.0 43.9 55.0 47.6 77.9 66.5 13.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 24.2 43.9 37.0 43.9 55.0 47.6 77.9 66.5 13.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 23 200 124 374 181 216 133 135 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 57 #310 #288 #607 #321 #383 #293 #277 39 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1130 784 540 523 Turn Bay Length (ft) 190 120 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 188 870 413 1231 630 829 231 282 313 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.71 0.72 0.90 0.82 0.89 0.86 0.72 0,19 Intersection Surnmanr # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer, Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 2016 No Build DHV w improvements Synchro 7 - Report NO Build NB Left and thru right shared NS Lead lag (ALT A) Page 1 5 A0 6a4 U W/kTA 00 Timing Report, Sorted By Phase STANTEC 3 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 12/9/2009 Pfiase.Nuinber 1 .....2._ . ...3 4 Movement WBL EBTL NBL SBTL EBL WBTL SBL NBT Ped LeadA-ag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None Maximum Split (s) 27 32 26 23 14 45 17 32 12 Maximum Split (%) 22.5% 26.7% 21.7% 19.2% 11.7% 37.5% 14.2% 26.7% 10.0% Minimum Split (s) 14 14 11 14 14 14 11 14 12 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 All -Red Time (s) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 Minimum Initial (s) 8 8 5 8 8 8 5 8 10 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0.2 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0.2 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 4 Flash Dont Walk (s) 6 Dual Entry Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 0 27 82 59 0 14 59 76 108 End Time (s) 27 59 108 82 14 59 76 108 0 Yield/Force Off (s) 21 53 102 76 8 53 70 102 118 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 21 53 102 76 8 53 70 102 112 Local Start Time (s) 93 0 55 32 93 107 32 49 81 Local Yield (s) 114 26 75 49 101 26 43 75 91 Local Yield 170(s) 114 26 75 49 101 26 43 75 85 In ersec73on Sjrijinjaty Cycle Length 120 Control Type Actuated -Uncoordinated Natural Cycle 110 and Phases: 14: Williston Road & M 94 03 1A ms 2016 No Build DHV w improvements Synchro 7 - Report NO Build NB Left and thru right shared NS Lead lag (ALT A) Page 1 lkit�u �+/AtT /► I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis STANTEC 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 12/9/2009 _JA -,* j- '1_ 41� t /0- 1* l W i!rtovern'ent EBL EST: EBR ... WBL.. WBT WBR , NBL - NBT = NBR Lane Configurations Mi 0 0 Volume (vph) 69 502 115 299 873 250 519 446 307 219 224 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 10 11 12 10 11 12 10 9 10 9 10 13 Grade (%) _1% 2% 1 % _1% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1676 3375 1651 3306 3188 2976 1616 1765 1661 Fit Permitted 0.15 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.95 1,00 0,93 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (permL 262 3375 320 3306 3188 2976 1583 1765 1661 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1 M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 69 502 115 299 873 250 519 446 307 219 224 65 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 16 0 0 21 0 0 101 0 0 0 55 Lane Group Flow (vph) 69 601 0 299 1102 0 519 652 0 219 224 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1°% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 33.1 26.9 51.4 39.2 20.9 25.2 16.4 16.4 16.4 Effective Green, g (s) 33.1 26.9 51.4 39.2 20.9 25.2 16.4 16.4 16.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.24 0.47 0.35 0.19 0.23 0.15 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 6,0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 158 822 372 1173 603 679 239 262 247 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.18 c0.13 c0.33 0.16 c0.22 c0.10 0,13 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.24 0.04 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.73 0.80 0.94 0.86 0.96 0.92 0.85 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 29.7 38.5 21.9 34.5 43.4 42.2 46.4 45.9 40.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incrernental Delay, d2 1.9 3.4 11.9 13.9 12.0 25.0 36,1 22.8 0.1 Delay (s) 31.6 41.8 33.8 48.4 55.4 67.1 82.4 68.7 40.4 Level of Service C D C D E E F E D Approach Delay (s) 40.8 45.4 62.3 71.0 Approach LOS D D E E In on! . ... HCM Average Control Delay 53.5 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.5 Sum of lost time (s) 24.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.1% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2016 DHV Build w improvements Synchro 7 - Report NB left and thru right shared NS Lead lag (ALT A) Page 1 bu1A wjALT A i Timing Report, Sorted By Phase STANTEC 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 12/9/2009 phase NyMbef 1 2 4 5 6 Movement WBL EBTL NBL SBTL EBL WBTL SBL NBT Ped Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None Maximum Split (s) 27 32 26 23 14 45 16 31 12 Maximum Split (%) 22.5% 26.7% 21.7% 19.2% 11.7% 37.5% 15.0% 25.8% 10.0% Minimum Split (s) 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 12 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 All -Red Time (s) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 Minimum Initial (s) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 10 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0.2 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0.2 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 4 Flash Font Walk (s) 6 Dual Entry Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 0 27 82 59 0 14 59 77 108 End Time (s) 27 59 108 82 14 59 77 108 0 Yield/Force Off (s) 21 53 102 76 8 53 71 102 118 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 21 53 102 76 8 53 71 102 112 Local Start Time (s) 93 0 55 32 93 107 32 50 81 Local Yield (s) 114 26 75 49 101 26 44 75 91 Local Yield 170(s) 114 26 75 49 101 26 44 75 85 Intersection Summary , 1 Cycle Length 120 Control Type Actuated -Uncoordinated Natural Cycle 120 2016 DHV Build w improvements Synchro 7 - Report NB left and thru right shared NS Lead lag (ALT A) Page 1 C l Bura4a �AL'�,A 3/, Queues STANTEC 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 12/9/2009 I_ane'Grou ' . EBL Mt, ;.. ML : , NB7 .M S8L 'tBf SI3ft :. Lane Group Flow (vph) 69 617 299 1123 519 753 219 224 65 vlc Ratio 0.37 0.75 0.79 0.92 0.84 0.95 0.89 0.83 0.21 Control Delay 24.6 44.1 37.5 45.1 56.8 55.9 81.9 71.0 12,7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 24.6 44.1 37.5 45.1 56.8 55.9 81.9 71.0 12.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 200 124 378 181 230 150 151 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 60 #310 #289 #615 #321 #413 #328 #319 41 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1130 784 540 523 Turn Bay Length (ft) 190 120 190 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 188 867 410 1227 616 796 245 281 319 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.37 0.71 0.73 0.92 0.84 0.95 0.89 0.80 0.20 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 2016 DHV Build w improvements Synchro 7 - Report NB left and thru right shared NS Lead lag (ALT A) Page 1 No WfA4 w/Avre, HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis STANTEC 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 12/9/2009 � --I. --r 4- .- � 4\ 4 t d Lane Configurations I +T# Vi +t* 4+ r 4M Volume (vph) 66 502 115 299 873 240 519 428 307 198 202 58 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 10 11 12 10 11 12 10 9 10 9 10 13 Grade (%) _1% 2% 1 % -1 % Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.91 1.00 0,91 0.91 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00 0.95 0.99 Said. Flow (prot) 1676 3375 1651 3310 1495 2987 1470 1471 3097 Fit Permitted 0.17 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd. Flow (perm) 297 3375 310 3310 1495 2987 1470 1471 3097 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 66 502 115 299 873 240 519 428 307 198 202 58 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 18 0 0 21 0 0 0 178 0 17 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 66 599 0 299 1092 0 311 636 129 152 289 0 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Split custom Split Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 13 7 7 Permitted Phases 2 6 3 Actuated Green, G (s) 30.1 23.8 46.4 34.1 22.1 22.1 38.7 11.1 11.1 Effective Green, g (s) 30.1 23.8 46.4 34.1 22.1 22.1 38.7 11.1 11.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.23 0.46 034 0.22 0.22 0.38 0,11 0.11 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 174 792 361 1113 326 651 561 161 339 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.18 c0.14 c0.33 0.21 c0.21 0.09 c0.10 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.24 vlc Ratio 0.38 0.76 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.98 0.23 0.94 0.85 Uniform Delay, di 27.5 36.1 20.7 33.3 39.1 39.4 21.2 44.8 44.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.4 4.2 14.4 22.3 37.5 29.2 0.2 54.1 18.3 Delay (s) 28.9 40.3 35.1 55.7 76.6 68.6 21.5 99.0 62.7 Level of Service C D D E E E C F E Approach Delay (s) 39.2 51.3 59.1 74.7 Approach LOS D D E E ter cfipri_"Summ�__- HCM Average Control Delay 54.5 HCM Level of Service CD HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.95 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 101.4 Sum of lost time (s) 24.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2016 No Build DHV w improvements HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis No Build NB left thru lane SB shared right and thru lanes NS Split (ALT B) Page 1 � r e`"° w/AT $ `3 Timing Report, Sorted By Phase STANTEC 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 12/9/2009 Phase Number f 2_.. 3 . '_ , :5; 6 7 9� Movement WBL EBTL NBTL EBL WBTL SBTL Ped LeadlLag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Maximum Split (s) 23 30 28 14 39 17 12 Maximum Split (%) 20.9% 27.3% 25.5% 12.7% 35.5% 15.5% 10.9% Minimum Split (s) 14 14 11 14 14 11 12 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 All -Red Time (s) 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 Minimum Initial (s) 8 8 5 8 8 5 10 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 0.2 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 0.2 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 4 Flash Dont Walk (s) 6 Dual Entry Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 0 23 53 0 14 81 98 End Time (s) 23 53 81 14 53 98 0 Yield/Force Off (s) 17 47 75 8 47 92 108 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 17 47 75 8 47 92 102 Local Start Time (s) 87 0 30 87 101 58 75 Local Yield (s) 104 24 52 95 24 69 85 Local Yield 170(s) 104 24 52 95 24 69 79 Intersection Summary " Cycle Length 110 Control Type Actuated -Uncoordinated Natural Cycle 110 2016 No Build DHV w improvements Timing Report, Sorted By Phase No Build NB left thru lane SB shared right and thru lanes NS Split (ALT B) Page 1 � l AD 6y*I U w/AiT 4'.,� Queues STANTEC 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 12l9i2009 Lane Group BBL. t6T, WBL ' . '. NIA. NO MBR 5BC SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 66 617 299 1113 311 636 307 152 306 v!c Ratio 0.32 0.78 0.81 0.95 0.93 0.95 0.41 0.92 0.84 Control Delay 21.8 42.8 39.3 49.6 73.5 63.5 3.5 98.2 62.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 21.8 42.8 39.3 49.6 73.5 63,5 3.5 98.2 62.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 22 180 114 350 209 215 4 104 97 Queue Length 95th (ft) 55 #286 #301 #596 #452 #394 32 #271 #204 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1130 784 540 523 Turn Bay Length (ft) 190 120 190 150 Base Capacity(vph) 204 844 374 1168 336 671 758 165 365 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spilfback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0,32 0.73 0.80 0.95 0.93 0.95 0.41 0.92 0.84 intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 2016 No Build DHV w improvements Queues No Build NB left thru lane SB shared right and thru lanes NS Split (ALT B) Page 1 70u%L•O wf im r g HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis STANTEC 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 1219/2009 Lane Configurations I fl� 1 +k Vi 0 r 1 414 Volume (vph) 69 502 115 299 873 250 619 446 307 219 224 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 10 11 12 10 11 12 10 9 10 9 10 13 Grade (%) _1% 2% 1% _1% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Fit 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0,95 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1676 3375 1651 3306 1495 2989 1470 1471 3096 Fit Permitted 0.16 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd. Flow ern 280 3375 289 3306 1495 2989 1470 1471 3096 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 69 502 115 299 873 250 519 446 307 219 224 65 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 16 0 0 21 0 0 0 167 0 16 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 69 601 0 299 1102 0 317 648 140 169 323 0 Heavy Vehicles (°%} 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Split custom Split Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 3 13 7 7 Permitted Phases 2 6 3 Actuated Green, G (s) 29.9 25.2 49.9 39.2 24.1 24.1 42.8 14.8 14.8 Effective Green, g (s) 29.9 25.2 49.9 39.2 24.1 24.1 42.8 14.8 14.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.23 0.45 0.35 0.22 0.22 0.39 0.13 0.13 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 135 769 361 1172 326 651 569 197 414 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.18 c0.14 c0.33 0.21 c0.22 0.10 c0.11 0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.23 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.78 0.83 0.94 0.97 1.00 0.25 0.86 0.78 Uniform Delay, d1 31.8 40.1 23.8 34.6 42.9 43.2 23.0 46.9 46.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.2 5.2 14.4 14.2 42.1 33.9 0.2 28.9 9.3 Delay (s) 35.1 45.3 38.2 48.8 85.1 77.1 23.2 75.7 55.6 Level of Service D D D D F E C E E Approach Delay (s) 44.3 46.6 66.1 62.3 Approach LOS D D E E HCM Average Control Delay 54.6 HCM Level of Service /� HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.6 Sum of lost time (s) 24.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2016 Build DHV w improvements Synchro 7 - Report NB left thru lane SB shared right and thru lanes NS Split (ALT B) Page 1 Queues STANTEC 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 12/9/2009 -t -► #- #- '\ 1` `► *'a Gm , EBL ,' EBT WBL WST' NBC NBT NBR SBC :96T Lane Group Flow (vph) 69 617 299 1123 317 648 307 169 339 We Ratio 0.44 0.81 0.81 0.92 0.95 0.97 0.41 0.84 0.77 Control Delay 29.4 48.4 42.1 45.4 80.9 70.7 3.9 79.3 55.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 29.4 48.4 42.1 45.4 80.9 70.7 3.9 79.3 55.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 25 204 132 378 239 246 8 126 119 Queue Length 95th (ft) 62 #330 #318 #615 #495 #434 37 #292 #218 Internal Unk Dist (ft)_ 1130 784 540 523 Turn Bay Length (ft) 190 120 190 190 150 Base Capacity(vph) 156 811 385 1225 335 669 764 206 449 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spikadc Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.44 0.76 0.78 0.92 0.95 0.97 0.40 0,82 0.76 kitersection_SU ary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 2016 Build DHV w improvements Synchro 7 - Report NB left thru lane SB shared right and thru lanes NS Split (ALT B) Page 1 Timing Report, Sorted By Phase STANTEC 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive i21912009 ase rVumbet 5, 6_.. Movement WBL EBTL NBTL EBL WBTL SBTL Ped Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Maximum Split (s) 26 31 30 12 45 21 12 Maximum Split (%) 21.7% 25.8% 25.0% 10.0% 37.5% 17.5% 10.0% Minimum Split (s) 14 14 14 14 14 14 12 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 All -Red Time (s) 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 Minimum Initial (s) 8 8 8 8 8 8 10 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 0.2 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 0.2 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 4 Flash Dont Walk (s) 6 Dual Entry Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 0 26 57 0 12 87 108 End Time (s) 26 57 87 12 57 108 0 YieldtForce Off (s) 20 51 81 6 51 102 118 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 20 51 81 6 51 102 112 Local Start Time (s) 94 0 31 94 106 61 82 Local Yield (s) 114 25 55 100 25 76 92 Local Yield 170(s) 114 25 55 100 25 76 86 Cycle Length 120 Control Type Actuated -uncoordinated Natural Cycle 120 Splits and Phases: 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 01 o3 o7 as r 2016 Build DHV w improvements Synchro 7 - Report NB left thru lane SB shared right and thru lanes NS Split (ALT B) Page 1 14 a tki%14 w/ &%.T c y5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis STANTEG 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 12/9/2009 Lane Configurations I Tk T r 3 ♦ r Volume (vph) 66 502 115 299 873 240 519 428 307 198 202 58 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 10 11 12 10 11 12 10 9 10 9 10 13 Grade (%) -1% 2% 1% -1% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6A 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prat) 1676 3376 1651 3421 1583 3188 1668 1470 1616 1765 1661 Fit Permitted 0.21 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.51 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 366 3375 275 3421 1583 3188 1668 1470 873 1765 1661 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 66 502 115 299 873 240 519 428 307 198 202 58 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 19 0 0 0 168 0 0 216 0 0 49 Lane Group Flow (vph) 66 598 0 299 873 72 519 428 91 198 202 9 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Prot Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 25.7 19.3 40.3 27.9 27.9 17.0 25.1 25.1 14.1 14.1 14.1 Effective Green, g (s) 25.7 19.3 40.3 27.9 27.9 17.0 25.1 25.1 14.1 14.1 14.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.21 0.43 0,30 0,30 0.18 0.27 0.27 0.15 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extensions 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 191 699 340 1024 474 582 449 396 180 267 251 vls Ratio Prot 0.02 0.18 c0.14 c0.26 0.16 c0.26 c0.07 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 c0.24 0.05 0.06 c0.10 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.86 0.88 0.85 0,15 0.89 0.95 0.23 1.10 0.76 0.03 Uniform Delay, dill 25.8 35.6 22.1 30.7 24.0 37.2 33.5 26.5 38.6 37.9 33.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 10.0 21.8 7.0 0.1 15.8 30.6 0.3 96A 11.6 0.1 Delay (s) 26.9 45.6 43.9 37.7 24.1 53.0 64,1 26.8 135.0 49.5 33.8 Level of Service C D D D C D E C F D C Approach Delay (s) 43.8 36.7 50A 84.4 Approach LOS D D D F HCM Average Control Delay 48.2 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 93.2 Sum of lost time (s) 24.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2016 No Build DHV w improvements HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis No Build NB left thru lane WB right lane NS lead lag (ALT C) Page 1 No VOU w/ItirC si Queues STANTEC 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 12/9/2009 } --► -- 4 41 t r* : 'r La le drou EBL... EBT- WBL WBT WBR �fBL N8T NBR SbL . SbT MR, , Lane Group Flow (vph) 66 617 299 873 240 519 428 307 198 202 58 vie Ratio 0.30 0.89 0.86 0.83 0.37 0.86 0.92 0.49 1.07 0.74 0.19 Control Delay 21.2 51.2 46.6 38.8 5.7 52.2 60.8 7.1 125.6 54.7 12.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 21.2 51.2 46.6 38.8 5.7 52.2 60.8 7.1 125.6 54.7 12.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 21 168 114 244 0 144 228 4 -112 108 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 54 #319 #312 #436 59 #274 #481 75 #293 #246 36 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1130 784 540 523 Turn Bay Length (ft) 190 120 190 150 150 Base Capacity(vph) 222 693 348 1057 655 601 463 622 185 274 307 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillbadc Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.30 0.89 0.86 0.83 0.37 0.86 0.92 0.49 1.07 0.74 0.19 IrNersection Summa .. - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 2016 No Build DHV w improvements Queues No Build NB left thru lane WB right lane NS lead lag (ALT C) Page 1 No au; t! 0-/Attc I Timing Report, Sorted By Phase STANTEC 3 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 1219/2009 1''hasa Number.. 1 2" 3 . 4 _ 5. _ ... Movement WBL EBTL NBL SBTL EBL WBTL SBL NBT Pod Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None Maximum Split (s) 21 24 23 20 14 31 12 31 12 Maximum Split (%) 21.0% 24.0% 23.0% 20.0% 14.0% 31.0% 12.0% 31.0% 12.0% Minimum Split (s) 14 14 11 11 14 14 11 11 12 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 All -Red Time (s) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 Minimum Initial (s) 8 8 5 5 8 8 5 5 10 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0.2 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0.2 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 4 Flash Dont Walk (s) 6 Dual Entry Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 0 21 45 68 0 14 76 45 88 End rime (s) 21 45 68 88 14 45 88 76 0 Yield/Force Off (s) 15 39 62 82 8 39 82 70 98 Yield/Force Oft 170(s) 15 39 62 82 8 39 82 70 92 Local Start Time (s) 79 0 24 47 79 93 55 24 67 Local Yield (s) 94 18 41 61 87 18 61 49 77 Local Yield 170(s) 94 18 41 61 87 18 61 49 71 intersection Surnmaq Cycle Length 100 Control Type Actuated -Uncoordinated Natural Cyde 100 Splits and Phases: 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 2016 No Build DHV w improvements Timing Report, Sorted By Phase No Build NB left thru lane WB right lane NS lead lag (ALT C) Page 1 Z4 . -0 w / AA.T C "11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis STANTEC 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 1219/2009 Lane Configurations 1 0 ) tt r t r t r Volume (vph) 69 502 115 299 873 250 619 446 307 219 224 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 10 11 12 10 11 12 10 9 10 9 10 13 Grade (%) -1% 2% 1°% -1°% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (prof) 1676 3375 1651 3421 1583 3188 1668 1470 1616 1765 1661 Flt Permitted 0.19 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow 343 3375 294 3421 1583 3188 1668 1470 972 1765 1661 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ad], Flow (vph) 69 502 115 299 873 250 519 446 307 219 224 65 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 19 0 0 0 105 0 0 184 0 0 51 Lane Group Flow (vph) 69 598 0 299 873 145 519 446 123 219 224 14 Heavy Vehicles M 1 % 1 °% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+ov Prot pm+ov pm+pt pm+ov Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 7 3 8 1 7 4 5 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 26.9 20.6 39.6 2T3 34.3 17.1 24.1 37.1 14.0 14.0 20.3 Effective Green, g (s) 26.9 20.6 39.6 27.3 34.3 17.1 24.1 37.1 14.0 14.0 20.3 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.29 0.22 0.43 0.30 0.37 0.18 0.26 0.40 0.15 0.15 0.22 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 - 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 191 752 317 1010 587 589 435 590 196 267 365 v1s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.18 c0.13 c0,26 0.02 0.16 c0.27 0.03 c0.08 0,13 0.00 vls Ratio Perm 0.08 c0.27 0.07 0.05 c0.08 0.01 vlc Ratio 0.36 0.79 0.94 0.86 0.25 0.88 1.03 0.21 1.12 0.84 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 24.8 34.0 21.1 30.8 20.2 36.7 34.2 18.1 38.2 38.2 28.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 5.8 35.6 7.8 0.2 14.4 49.8 0.2 99.3 20.0 0.0 Delay (s) 26.0 39.8 56.7 38.7 20.4 51,1 84.0 18.3 137.5 58.2 28.5 Level of Service C D E D C D F B F E C Approach Delay (s) 38.4 39.2 54.7 88.6 Approach LOS D D D F Intersection Summary . ..... %'""�► --- HCM Average Control Delay 50.6 HCM Level of Service rl D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.03 i�..r� Actuated Cycle Length (s) 92.5 Sum of lost time (s) 24.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2016 DHV Build w improvements Synchro 7 - Report NB Left + WB Right NS Lead -Lag (ALT C) Page 1 p�: u w/At,T tG Timing Report, Sorted By Phase STANTEC 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 12/9/2009 '0 -► 4\ � 0 -- 1* t k Pbase.Number 1 '2 3 4 5 6 '7 8_ Movement WBL EBTL NBL SBTL EBL WBTL SBL NBT Ped LeadA-ag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None Maximum Split (s) 19 26 23 20 14 31 13 30 12 Maximum Split (%) 19.0% 26.0% 23.0% 20.00k 14.0% 31.0% 13.0% 30.00k 12.0% Minimum Split (s) 14 14 11 14 14 14 11 14 12 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 All -Red Time (s) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 Minimum Initial (s) 8 8 5 8 8 8 5 8 10 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0.2 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0.2 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 4 Flash Dont Walk (s) 6 Dual Entry Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 0 19 45 68 0 14 75 45 88 End Time (s) 19 45 68 88 14 45 88 75 0 YieldlForce Off (s) 13 39 62 82 8 39 82 69 98 YlekllForce Off 170(s) 13 39 62 82 8 39 82 69 92 Local Start Time (s) 81 0 26 49 81 95 56 26 69 Local Yield (s) 94 20 43 63 89 20 63 50 79 Local Yield 170(s) 94 20 43 63 89 20 63 50 73 )ntsrse�tion. Summary Cycle Length 100 Control Type Actuated -Uncoordinated Natural Cycle 100 NVA 2016 DHV Build w improvements Synchro 7 - Report NB Left + WB Right NS Lead -Lag (ALT C) Page 1 t4�4 to/J ITC s,4, Queues STANTEC 14: Williston Road & Airport Drive 12/9/2009 --,* ---r. *0- *- *.- -N 1 t' Is. W Larne Gtou ; ESL EBT. -"MT, NB �BT3R SQL SET R3 Lane Group Flow (vph) 69 617 299 873 250 519 446 307 219 224 65 v/c Ratio 0.31 0.83 0.93 0.84 0.34 0.86 1.00 0.39 1.08 0.81 0.13 Control Delay 21.1 43.6 59.7 39.7 5.6 51.2 76.8 2.8 125.8 61.0 6.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 21.1 43.6 59.7 39.7 5.6 61.2 76.8 2.8 125.8 61.0 6.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 21 163 113 244 18 144 245 0 -128 121 0 Queue Length 951h (ft) 57 #294 #325 #436 47 #274 #519 25 #318 #282 26 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1130 784 540 523 Turn Bay Length (ft) 190 120 120 190 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 223 775 320 1041 729 607 448 788 203 277 493 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spilback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.80 0.93 0.84 0.34 0.86 1.00 0.39 1.08 0.81 0.13 fntersectinii '&umrrrar5r - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically Infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 2016 DHV Build w improvements Synchro 7 - Report NB Left + WB Right NS Lead -Lag (ALT C) Page 1 0 Stantec Memo To: Ray Belair, , Administrative Officer City of South Burlington File:195310247 From: David DeBaie John Leinwohl Stantec Consulting Services 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel: 802-864-0223 Fax: 802-864-0165 Date: December 11, 2009 Reference: BTV 2009 Traffic Study - ROW costs in relation to Alternative Improvements to Williston Road and Airport Drive This memo provides responses to the South Burlington Planning Department regarding Right of Way (ROW) costs associated with alternative improvements of the Williston Road and Airport Drive Intersection. In a December 10, 2009 memo, Stantec provided graphic illustrations of alternate improvements to the intersection to meet the existing and future No Build deficiencies for the City of South Burlington as part of the Design Review Board approval process for the proposed expansion of the Airport garage. A traffic study was prepared in 2009 for the purpose of identifying impacts. This information complements that provided in the December 10, 2009 memo. The purpose of this information is to provide a representation of the ROW costs that is consistent with the opinion of improvement cost associated with the general idea of adding lanes to specific approaches to improve the existing deficient capacity. Detailed design has not been done and therefore the ROW requirements and actual value are general. The applied basis of land value is $277,000 per acre. This is an average of actual residential property transactions on Airport Drive during 2009. The ROW requirements of the alternative improvements are not residential properties but rather commercial properties. No attempt has been made to judge the relative value in terms of the use or the location of the required properties. The applied ROW / property lines are also the best information available. The ROW lines are from a public GIS resource. That resource appears to be the same as used for the recently completed Route 2 (Williston Road) corridor study prepared by the CCMPO. Graphic illustrations in the Final Report of that Study available on the CCMPO website indicates that the existing northernmost westbound Route 2 roadway lies outside the ROW. This situation may or may not be real however based on the available One Team. Infinite Solutions. Jbl cAdocuments and settings\ leinwohNocal settings\temporary intemet files\olk1 b\121109 memo (2).doc Stantec December 11, 2009 Page 2 of 2 Reference: BTV 2009 Traffic Study - ROW costs in relation to Alternative Improvements to Williston Road and Airport Drive information the assumption is that this existing ROW need is included in the overall need for each alternative. The Table below illustrates the ROW needs for the Alternative Improvements described in the December 10, 2009 memo. Airport Ownership Other Ownership Total Acreage Value Acreage Value Acreage Value Existing* 0.165 $45,705 0.010 $2,770 0.175 $48,475 Alternative A 0.223 $61,771 0.010 $2,770 0.233 $64,451 Alternative B 0.223 $61,771 0.010 $2,770 0.233 $64,451 Alternative C 0.331 $91,687 0.010 $2,770 0.341 $94,457 *The existing westbound Route 2 roadway and sidewalk east of the intersection lies outside the ROW. Alternatives A, B and C include this existing need. BO Planning Mr. Ray Belair January 20, 2010 Administrative Office Invoice No: 00362.12.0 - 5 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Project 00362.12.0 SB Airport Parking & Traffic Study Review traffic study for Burlington Airport Professional Services from December 01, 2009 to December 31, 2009 Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Jacquemart, Georges 1.50 200.00 300.00 Rabiee, Alireza 4.00 125.00 500.00 Totals 5.50 800.00 Total Labor 800.00 Total Amount Due $800.00 Outstanding Invoices Number Date Balance 4 12/17/2009 4,050.00 Total 4,050.00 Billings to Date Current Prior Total Received Labor 800.00 11,900.00 12,700.00 Totals 800.00 11,900.00 12,700.00 7,850.00 i ��� L aoioi� south PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington City Development Revie oar From: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Office Date: November 25, 2009 Re: Burlington International Airport Parking Garage Expansion Staff is waiting for a memorandum from the City's traffic consultant. If available for the meeting, the applicant may or may not be present at the meeting to discuss the consultant's recommendations. 575 Dorset Street South Bwhrigron, VT 0')403 tel A0 840 4106 fax 802 846.4101 WWW,Sbtarl.COM r DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 15 DECEMBER 2009 PAGE 3 Quarry Hill Rd, noted that the original study is 5 years old. Mr. Dinklage said that is why the DRB wants it reviewed. Mr. Behr moved to invoke technical review of the traffic study. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. With regard to landscaping, Mr. Dinklage noted that the Board will be looking for internal landscaping, not only plantings around the perimeter. Mr. Dinklage then read into the record a letter from Sandra Dooley, a neighbor on East Terrace. She opposes the height waiver because of the impact on views. She also —expressed concerns about the traffic impact and parking. A neighbor asked how much ambulance traffic is anticipated and whether they will use the emergency access off East Terrace. Mr. Dinklage also asked if the facility runs a bus or van to take residents to events, appointments, etc. That would have to be factored into the traffic numbers. The applicant indicated that at a similar facility they have 3-7 ambulance trips a month. He was not sure what route they would take. Ms. LaRose said the emergency access is to be used only when the regular access is blocked in some way. The applicant indicated they have a bus for shuttling residents to appointments. A resident noted that when the original traffic study was done school was not in session. Ms. Bull said the Land Development Regulations are very specific as to when a waiver should or should not be allowed. She asked the Board to follow the regulations. Mr. Dinklage said it was the Board's intent to make an informed decision. Mr. Young asked how long a cul de sac can be. Ms. LaRose said a cul de sac outside the Southeast Quadrant does not have length limit. Mr. Behr moved to continue Preliminary Plat Application #SD-09-50 of Bullrock Corporation until 2 February 2010. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Continued Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 of Burlington International Airport to construct two additional parking levels to an existing three -level parking garage to accommodate 1370 vehicles, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Belair noted a correction in the approval motion. The top of the coping will reach 77 feet. Mr. Belair also noted that the statement "lighting is adequate" applies to exterior lighting. Any interior lighting cannot have a hot spot visible off the premises. Fixtures must be down casting. Mr. Racek, the architect, said fixtures will be the same as what is there now. The bulb can be seen. Mr. Belair noted that because these fixtures will be higher, they will have to be shielded. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 15 DECEMBER 2009 PAGE 4 Mr. Leinwohl noted there will be 3 crosswalks near the garage. The Airport will be responsible for the construction of these; however, the city will be installing LED hardware to signal the crosswalks. Mr. Leinwohl said they want to go on record as opposing the imposition of 25.3% of the Williston Rd/Kennedy Dr/Airport Dr intersection upgrade. They feel the fair amount is 13%. The intersection is already operating at a poor level of service, and they believe it is the responsibility of the city to address that. Mr. Belair said the city's traffic consultant disagrees with the Airport position. He -- -- --suggested- DRB-ask a- representative of BFJ to come to a meeting and explain -that - position. Mr. DeBaie said if the city made improvements so that the intersection operated at LOS "D" and Airport traffic were added to that, the intersection would still operate at LOS "D." Mr. Dinklage said that reasoning does not work for him. Mr. Farley asked what improvements should be done. Mr. DeBaie said a left turn lane, fine tuning of timing. - Mr. Dinklage said there is not a lot of money involved in this. The Airport's share would be $135,000 with a $72,000 credit for donated land. That leaves $63,000. Mr. Leinwohl said it is the principle they are concerned with. Mr. Belair said BFJ has explained to him and to Paul Conner how they came up with their recommendation. Mr. Bresee said that pedestrian traffic through that intersection also has to be considered. Mr. Young said it is his understanding that the proposed building will be more than twice the height allowed. He felt that was an enormous waiver. Ms. LaRose said portions of the stair towers are much higher than the majority of the building. The building is 57 feet, not 77 feet. Mr. Belair added that the existing building already blocks views of the mountains, and the applicant is not making it any worse. Mr. Stuono asked if Burlington voters will be asked to approve money for all or part of the building. Mr. McEwing said they will probably start with only the north end of the building. Mr. Stuono asked if only one phase might be completed. Mr. McEwing said they would see what happens. Mr. Stuono wanted to know what the building would look like with only one phase completed. Mr. Leinwohl said they want to build it all; it's a , question of financing. Mr. Belair said they will have to come back with a phasing plan. Mr. Leinwohl noted that with regard to the bike racks in the parking garage being monitored by an attendant or closed circuit TV, they are within sight of a manager's office. There have been no problems in the past. Ms. LaRose noted that the aim is to reduce as much car traffic as possible, and having people be able to bike to work at the Airport is important. Mr. Bresee said they need signage to tell people where the bike rack is. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 15 DECEMBER 2009 PAGE 5 The approval motion, Stipulation #10, was amended to add "and/or garage manager's office" and to require adequate signage for the bike rack area. Mr. Behr then moved to approve Site Plan Application #SD-09-63 of Burlington International Airport subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 5-1 with Mr. Stuono opposing. 6. Preliminary Plat Application #SD-09-51 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, for a planned unit development to construct a 50,000 sq. ft. office building; 119 Tilley Drive: Mr. Bouchard said this will be a 2-story, 50,000 sq. ft. commercial office -building this time, it will be general office use. Mr. Dinklage asked why the western roadway is needed. Mr. Bouchard said they discussed this at length with staff. The desire is to have 2 curb cuts. The need to make an accommodation to get fire trucks to the back hydrant. Mr. Dinklage noted that when the Interstate cloverleaf is completed, most of the western curb cut will not be viable. He asked why the applicant doesn't plan for that now. Mr. Bouchard said if they move the drive to the front, everything moves to the west. Mr. Dinklage felt the building could be reconfigured so that the major entrance is somewhere else and parking could be moved. Mr. Behr agreed that the main entrance should be designed for what will be there in the future. Mr. Bouchard said they are willing to abandon that drive when the Interchange goes in, and they are willing to build only 30 feet of the road, but they are not willing to eliminate it now. Ms. LaRose noted that in the subdivision approval, it specifically says this shall not be the primary entrance to the subdivision. Mr. Armstrong said their biggest concern is the main access road. He said the regulations require that impact to a residential development be minimized. He felt this road is too close. Ms. LaRose read from the original subdivision approval that traffic shall be diverted away from the western most access. Mr. Dinklage felt those words are intended as a guide. Mr. Bouchard said they would have to redo the subdivision. He said they would agree to keep the access but not have any curb cuts into the parking lot for lot #6. Members agreed that the western access should not serve lot #6. Mr. Knudsen was concerned that later there will be no alternative but to allow that road to be used for lot #7 until the Interchange is built. Mr. Dinklage said the subdivision did not firm up the location for buildings. He had no problem relocating buildings, accesses, etc. Mr. Bouchard said they will take a closer look at this. �'" :600101� southburfington PLANNING & ZONING December 17, 2009 Robert McEwing, Director of Planning and Development Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Airport Garage Expansion Dear Mr. McEwing: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Development Review Board on December 15, 2009 (effective 12/15/09). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, eyva Jana BeagIey Planning and Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7009 0080 0001 4401 5645 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tell 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com south PLANNING & ZONING December 17, 2009 Jon Leinwohl and David DeBaie Stantec Consulting 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Airport Garage Expansion Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, ?Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www sburl corn Interested Persons Record and Service List southhuriu(yton V E 5 h.0 147 Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity -for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested -person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every - - person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant D in five working days. 24 V.S.A. §l4471(c). HEARING DATE: rC • I �' 6� 1 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST �AI6 ✓��G,,� ��G1�-Zt 'P ! i 60)�>�ie J&� Ae; h �,�, 1 S ��fi i'��or. L, 3%411e"Jck 1)tt/. 4. (0t to d-- At 6 h eC 0 s /Ir0 ( k 0 ,0() ,off ft&oSE S f&XII-ei J r�Y'wa- 5 tQVi4 �5Z5 4iF"ec&tes r2xovc U L�/ 7-5 G GOL�GaES T2 41r- Interested Persons Record and Service List southh, url . lto vE, V 0 N T Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board ('DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.-S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of -each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the- DRB must be -mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB: 24 V.S-.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon - receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB_must_supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST ecAl(, L,e) Nk�T(!11 AW L ,s Pd,�-�— Q PI) 13vv YTJ- Y7 1,t �uI ✓� � �i.�T% 6 Sj � �orr � �w J (,C., AM Interested Persons Record and Service List south url.iv Yt€ u VLiWDNI' Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At -any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation- of each person who has sought -interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must -be mailed to -every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: N_— t`7 —63 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST t>DuaLAJS Dlc_�q 00 U � �rl&v" �VIAA &0,q b 0 1Z S �� /2/7 r&_CVr__ ­16 Z� Criuhw� // Arc �p1pr� vv�.Vln V•r' �� l.�E. /`i�l•Z� ��N[.7.Tv�I���--�r r�t7 S�7 (jlU�C�i M%'j' vU7_ t-ii�'�1`�` rrl F-Pog-T- F0 UV__j_ I A fm",�,9�'iub#�cet Interested Persons Record and Service List South1jarlington v E9 V0Vr Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Bard (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The aRB-must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed -to every - person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V_S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DREImust supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST ... BTV Parking Availability Assessment Stantec (091609) Facility Use Existing 2016 (with 25%growth) Parking Supply Public Parking Availability Parking Supply Public Parking Availability Average Day Peak Day Average Day Peak Day Garage Public 1,533 Yes No 2,903 Yes No* Rental Car Companies 542 NA NA 542 NA NA Onsite Lot off Airport Drive Long term Shuttle 302 Yes No 302 302 302** Onsite Lot off Airport Drive Extension Long term Valet 150 Yes No 150 150 50** Onsite Lot off Airport Drive Extension Long term Valet 18 Yes No 18 18 18** Curb Parking off Airport Loop Road Short term 10 Yes No 10 10 10** Airfield Long term Overflow Valet 750 Yes No 750 NA NA Quarry Site off Williston Road Long term Restricted Valet 500 Yes Yes 500 Yes No** FAA Lot off Airport Loop Road FAA 100 NA NA 100 NA NA Employee Lot off Airport Drive Employees 220 NA NA 220 NA NA Rental Car Maintenance off loop Road Rental Car Companies 308 NA NA 308 NA NA Total 4,433 5,803 Yes — spaces are available; No — spaces are not available; NA — Not Applicable: Assumes Employee and FAA use is unchanged; and additional Rental Car requirements are served offsite. * Existing peak day parking demand fills garage (1,533) and 750 cars on airfield (after using other shuttle and valet spaces.) On peak days by 2016, twenty-five percent airport growth may result in 2,854 space demand which would effectively fill the garage. **Existing onsite valet spaces total 480 spaces. Future demand consistent with 25 percent growth would increase demand to 600 spaces which would either fill the 500 space restricted valet Quarry Lot plus 100 spaces onsite or some other combination equaling 600 spaces. 0 � y O O O O n _ O I III a � � •, , •, • � • '•• � r ♦ f f j` • s• III �f r� ��` i � •t� �•.•„ L � ! `fir♦ � C ��.�//R�+� � � � � FAA RENTAL CAR � MAINTENANCE / LONG TERM -VALET ""' -308 SPACES PARKING AREA 18 SPACES i r EXISTING LONG TERM PASSENGER 302 SPACES �n f�r PARKING GARAGE TERMINAL �U CURB EMPLOYEE 2,903 SPACES (PUBLIC) 10 SPACES ONG TERM - VALET " 220 SPACES 542 SPACES (RENTAL) J PARKING AREA Q 150 SPACES \ � MAIN TERMINAL PARKING CIO South Burlington Vermont Burlington International Airport Traffic Study 195310247 10/6/2009 QUARRY SITE LONG TERM RESTRICTED ACCESS - VALET yy� PARKING AREA I BTV Parkin Location Use Existing Prop. Addition Total PUBLIC Garage Short term 1,533 1,370 2,903 Onsite Lot off Airport Drive Long Term Shuttle 302 0 302 Onsite Lot off Airport Drive Extension Long Term Valet 150 0 150 18 Onsite Lot off Airport Dore Extension Long Term Valet 18 0 10 Curb Parking off Airport Poop road Short Term 10 0 750 Airfield Long Term Overflow Valet 750* 0 Quarry Site off Williston Road Long Term Restricted Valet 500** 0 500 ALL PUBLIC 3,263 11,370 4,633 NON-PUBLIC FAA Lot off Airport loop road FAA 100 0 100 220 Employee Lot off Airport Drive Employees 220 0 542 Garage Rental Vehicles 542 0 308 Rental Car Maintenance off loop road Rental Vehicles 308 0 1,170 ALL NON - PUBLIC 1,170 0 TOTAL 4,433 1,370 15,803 * Up to 750 cars valet parked on airfield for peak day parking overflow needs '* Up to 500 cars parked at Airport "Quarry" site with valet access and egress restricted to nightime only Existing and Proposed Burlington International Airport Parking Facilities Figure 1 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT U.S.A. 05403 Tel. 802.864.0223 Fax. 802.864.0165 S'taideC www.stantec.com '1 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PASSENGER ENPLANEMENTS 800,000 7759000 7509000 7259000 7009000 6759000 v= ; *.• ACTUAL 650,000 k.� x FORECAST (3.200) "' HISTORICAL TRENDLINE w 6259000 4:' Z 6009000 J 575 000 M w I1{y W µ w M ^� 5509000 A .,_ILT 5259000 500 000 ,, N. 4r- 4759000 w kMIM 450,000 425 000 4009000 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 YEAR Page 1 of 1 Jana Beagley From: devost5@comcast.net Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 10:40 AM To: Jana Beagley Subject: Airport Garage Expansion Dear Mr. Beagley, While I am in favor of the Airport Garage expansion, my concerns are for some type of increased public interest to access to the roof top area. I would think this would raise some security questions as I think general security in and around the parking garage is poor at best. If these comments could be shared at the next meeting, I would appreciate it. Thank you. s/ Robert (Bob) Devost 12/18/2009 southburlingtou PLANNING & ZONING December 7, 2009 MILLIKEN CAROLINE B 133 COUNTRY CLUB DR E S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 Re: Burlington International Airport Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the December 15, 2009 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. The enclosure includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846- 4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant W Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com BFJ Planning Mr. Ray Belair Administrative Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Project 00362.12.0 SIB Airport Parking & Traffic Study Review traffic study for Burlington Airport Professional Services from November 01 2009 to November 30 2009 Professional Personnel December 17, 2009 Invoice No: 00362.12.0 - 4 Hours Rate Amount Jacquemart, Georges 9.00 200.00 1,800.00 Rabiee, Alireza 18.00 125.00 2,250.00 Totals 27.00 4,050.00 Total Labor Total Amount Due Outstanding Invoices Number Date Balance 3 11/10/2009 2,750.00 Total 2,750.00 Billings to Date Current Prior Total Received Labor 4,050.00 7,850.00 11,900.00 Totals 4,050.00 7,850.00 11,900.00 5,100.00 INVOICE 4,050.00 $4,050.00 IN Planning Mr. Ray Belair Administrative Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Project 00362.12.0 SB Airport Parking & Traffic Study Review traffic study for Burlington Airport Professional Services from October 01. 2009 to October 31, 2009 Professional Personnel Hours Jacquemart, Georges 5.50 Rabiee, Alireza 15.00 Totals 20.50 Total Labor Outstanding Invoices Number Date Balance 2 10/26/2009 4,550.00 Total 4,550.00 Billings to Date Current Prior Labor 2,750.00 5,100.00 Totals 2,750.00 5,100.00 November 10, 2009 Invoice No: 00362.12.0 - 3 Rate Amount 200.00 1,100.00 110.00 1,650.00 2,750.00 2,750.00 Total Amount Due $2,750.00 Total Received 7,850.00 7,850.00 550.00 Mr. Ray Belair October 26, 2009 Administrative Office Invoice No: 00362.12.0 - 2 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Project 00362.12.0 SB Airport Parking & Traffic Study Review traffic study for Burlington Airport Professional Services from September 01. 2009 to September 30, 2009 Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Jacquemart, Georges 9.00 200.00 1,800.00 Rabiee, Alireza 25.00 110.00 2,750.00 Totals 34.00 4,550.00 Total Labor 4,550.00 Total Amount Due $4,550.00 Billings to Date Current Prior Total Received Labor 4,550.00 550.00 5,100.00 Totals 4,550.00 550.00 5,100.00 550.00 Invoice Buckhurst Fish & Jacquemart, Inc. 115 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10003 Telephone # 212-353-7484 September 11, 2009 Invoice No: 00362.12-0000001 Ray Belair, Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington VT 05403 Project: 00362.12 SB Airport Parking & Traffic Study Review traffic study for Burlington Airport Professional services from August 1, 2009 to August 31, 2009 Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Rabiee, Alireza 5.00 110.00 550.00 Totals 5.00 550.00 Total Labor Total this invoice Billings to date Current Prior Total Labor 550.00 0.00 550.00 Totals 550.00 0.00 550.00 550.00 $550.00 0 Stantec Transmittal Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington VT 05403 Tel: (802) 864-0223 Fax: (802) 864-0165 To: Ray Belair From: Jon Leinwohl, P.E. Company: City of South Burlington X For Your Information Address: 575 Dorset Street ❑ For Your Approval South Burlington VT ❑ For Your Review 05403 ❑ As Requested Phone: (802) 846-4106 Date: September 10, 2009 File: 195310247 Delivery: Hand Delivery Reference: Burlington Airport Parking Garage Expansion Photometric Plan for North Expansion Attachment: Copies Doc Date Pages Description 8 9/10/09 1 Photometric Plan for the Parking Garage Expansion (North Section only) Ray, As we discussed this afternoon, the enclosed photometric plan has been developed for the north section of the proposed garage expansion. The photometric for the south section is being developed and will be submitted to you when completed. The lighting proposed for the south section is essentiaNy the same as the north section. It is noted that the photometric shows luminance value approaching zero within approximately 20' of the parking garage. Regarding concerns expressed by staff and the DRB about light bulb "hot Spots" in the garage being visible from the street and adjoining neighborhoods, the Airport plans to install a sample fixture that may be viewed for assessment. We will let you know when this has been installed and where it is located. One Team. Infinite Solutions. V \1953\active\195310247\aviation\Permits\South Burlington\SB DRB Photometric Plan 2009 09 10 doc No Text DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 NOVEMBER 2009 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; E. Knudsen, G. Quimby, R. Farley, B. Stuono Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; C. LaRose, Associate Planner; P. Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning; B. Cimonetti, D. Young, S. Dooley, K. Donahue, E. Farrell, M. Young, M. Dufresne, B. Gilbert, S. Dopp, T. Kleh, W. Charish, M. Pitt, M. Scollins, P. Walcott, D. Warshaw 1. Other Business & Announcements: No issues were raised. 2. Final Plat Application #SD-09-47 of John Larkin to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of five multi -family dwellings totaling 160 units and a 40-unit congregate housing facility. The amendment consists of allowing the footings of the building to encroach into the front setback requirement and the Interstate Highway Overlay District, 326 Quarry Hill Road: Ms. Dufresne showed the location of the building. She noted that the encroachments will be 2' 6" in front and 1' 2" in the rear. The footings will not be visible from the surface. Mr. Belair said staff has no issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-09-47 of John Larkin subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Continued Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 of Burlington International Airport to construct two additional parking levels to an existing three -level parking garage to accommodate 1370 vehicles, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Belair advised that the applicant had requested a continuance until 1 December. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 of Burlington International Airport until 1 December 2009. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-42 of Gary Farrell et al for a planned unit development on a 26.1 acre parcel developed with two single family dwellings. The proposal consists of: 1) razing one single family dwelling, 2) constructing 13 two-family dwelling, and 3) constructing 22 three -unit multi -family dwellings, 1302, 1340 and 1350 Spear Street: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 NOVEMBER 2009 PAGE 2 subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Miscellaneous Application 4MS-09-09 of Joe Larkin to alter the existing grade by adding 800 cubic yards of fill, 23 Pinnacle Drive: Mr. Larkin showed the area where fill will go. He said he had talked with neighbors regarding plantings and drainage concerns. He indicated they will use contours so water will flow away from the house. Mr. Donahue noted that even if the DRB approves this, the Pinnacle Board can deny it. He said the Board is concerned with remaining views of the lake from Pinnacle and wants to keep the view corridor open. Mr. Belair noted that no landscaping is allowed to grow higher than the house. Mr. Donahue noted there are sometimes covenants which are more restrictive than city regulations. He felt there should be a way to coordinate this, possibly asking the applicants if they are aware of any covenants. Mr. Knudsen said the DRB cannot deny an application because it conflicts with private covenants. Mr. Bresee referred to the Spear St. corridor study and suggested the applicant consider that if a berm is to be built. Mr. Belair said they are 35 feet from city property, so there are no city issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Miscellaneous Application #MS-09-09 of Joe Larkin subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-45 of Algimantas & Neringa Shalna to subdivide a 39,475 sq. ft. parcel into three lots of 13,938 sq. ft. (lot 2A), 12,746 sq. ft. (Lot 2B), and 12, 746 sq. ft. (Lot 2C), 45 Highland Terrace: Mr. Behr noted that the DRB met with the Planning Commission regarding issues in the City. The Planning Commission was very clear about having applicants adhere to design standards in a district relating to density, etc. He noted that lot 2A is not in compliance with the district regulations as it is being presented. The applicant showed an alternate plan that does conform. He said it is actually cheaper to build. Staff was OK with the applicant going forward. 6. Continued Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 of Burlington International Airport to construct two additional parking levels to an existing three -level parking garage to accommodate 1370 vehicles, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Belair advised that the applicant had asked to continue the application until 17 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 NOVEMBER 2009 PAGE 3 November. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Site Plan Application 4SP-09-63 of Burlington International Airport until 17 November 2009. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-40 of New England Expedition -South Burlington for a planned unit development on a 57.26 acre parcel developed with a hotel and restaurant. The project consists of: 1) subdividing the property into four lots, 2) constructing a shopping center to include four buildings totaling 120,800 sq. ft., and 3) constructing 70 residential units, 1076 Williston Road (Whole Foods): Mr. Belair advised that the applicant had asked for a continuance until 1 December. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-40 of New England Expedition -South Burlington until 1 December 2009. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Review of Previous Decisions: Mr. Board reviewed previous decision motions that had not been available at the meeting of 20 October due to illness in the Planning Department. No issues were raised. Members briefly discussed the upcoming schedule and agreed to meet on 1 and 15 December. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Awl P 01Z " Clerk Z 7> Date ( Page 1 of 1 ray From: Leinwohl, Jon Oon.leinwohl@stantec.com] Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 9:56 AM To: ray Cc: Robert McEwing; hkendrew@btv.aero; Bradford J Worthen; DeBaie, Dave; Paul Conner Subject: RE: Airport Parking Garage Expansion Ray, Based on the status of the traffic study review noted below, we are requesting further continuance of the DRB hearing for the parking garage expansion project to the Nov 17 meeting. We would like to emphasize that it is important to move this review process along as quickly as possible. Thank you, Jon Leinwohl From: ray [mailto:rbelair@sburl.com] Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 8:36 AM To: Leinwohl, Jon Subject: Airport Parking Garage Expansion Hi Jon, We have not heard back from Georges and even if we did, it is too late to review whatever his response is to the information you recently provided him for the Nov. 3rd meeting. Therefore you should either request a continuation or will ask the Board to continue your request. Thanks. Ray Belair Administrative Officer �r City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Ph: 802.846.4106 Fax: 802.846.4101 rbelair@sburl.com www.sburl.com 10/30/2009 south'M PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann La Rose, Associate Planner(:C /� � RE: Agenda #8, Site Plan application #SP-09-63, Burlington International Airport DATE: October 15, 2009 Staff is working with the applicant to address traffic concerns. More time is needed to work through additional data. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board continue Site Plan application #SP-09-63 to November 3, 2009. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tell 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com (� ( Page 1 of 1 I ray From: Leinwohl, Jon Don.leinwohl@stantec.com] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 4:55 PM To: ray Cc: Robert McEwing; Heather Kendrew; Bradford J Worthen; Paul Conner; Cathyann LaRose; DeBaie, Dave Subject: RE: Burlington Airport Parking Garage Expansion Ray, Based on the outcome of yesterday's conference call with BFJ, additional engineering work is required to address outstanding comm—_mts on the traffic study. Consequently, on behalf of the Airport, we are requesting continuance of the Oct 20 DRB Hearing for the garage expansion projc;ct. Jon Leinwohl From: Leinwohl, Join Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 10:11 AM To: 'Ray Belair (rbelair@sburl.com)' Cc: 'Robert McEwing'; 'Bradford J Worthen'; 'pcenner@sburl.com'; Debaie, Dave; Cathyann L. LaRose Subject: Burlington Airport Parking Garage Expansion Ray, To follow-up on our voice mail exchange Fri, Oct 2 and our phone conversation this morning, on behalf of the Burlington Airport we are requesting a continuance of the Oct 6 DRB Hearing for the Garage Expansion project. This is based on the need for additional time required to resolve comments regarding the traffic. Also, this e-mail is to confirm that will will be meeting with you and Paul Connor at 2:00 on Wed, Oct 7 at your office We will also elan on participating in a conferr-,nc,. call with you and BFJ at 10:00 on Wed, Oct 14. As discussed, we can hold the conference call in the Airport conference room if that works for you. Thank you, Jon Jon Leinwohl, P.E. Associate, Transportation Stantec 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington VT 05403 Ph: (802) 864-0223 Ext. 110 Fx: (802) 864-0165 Cell: (802) 734-0446 jon.leinwohl@stantec.com stantec.com The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately. 'j Please consider the environment before printing this email. 10/16/2009 1' DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 20 OCTOBER 2009 PAGE 4 lots more in compliance as the applicant is asking for a waiver. Mr. Stuono said if it doesn't meet the standards without a waiver, the argument can be made that it doesn't fit the zoning. He noted the Board required another developer to come much closer to the standards than this. Mr. McCain showed the Board another plan which he said demonstrates why the standards won't work here. Mr. Stuono said he felt these lots are not what the city wants here, and he is very uncomfortable with it. Mr. Farley and Ms. Quimby were OK with the design because it is infill. Mr. Birmingham said he can see both points. He felt there has to be a standard the Board can hold to. He added that he would prefer to see only 2 lots. Mr. McCain said with infrastructure costs, that isn't feasible. Mr. Stuono felt this may be a situation where you can't max out density. He said the proposed plan creates a house that is virtually isolated from the rest of the community, a "backyard" lot. Mr. Birmingham said he favored continuing the hearing until the rest of the planning staff is available to comment. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Sketch Plan Application of Algimantas and Neringa Shalna until 3 November 2009. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Continued Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 of Burlington International Airport to construct two additional parking levels to an existing three level parking garage to accommodate 1370 vehicles, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Belair advised that the applicant has asked for a continuance until 3 November. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 of Burlington International Airport until 3 November 2009. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Clerk Ilk Date Page 1 of 1 ray From: Leinwohl, Jon Don.leinwohl@stantec.com] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 10:11 AM To: ray Cc: Robert McEwing; Bradford J Worthen, Paul Conner; DeBaie, Dave; Cathyann LaRose Subject: Burlington Airport Parking Garage Expansion Ray, To follow-up on our voice mail exchange Fri, Oct 2 and our phone conversation this morning, on behalf of the Burlington Airport we are requesting a continuance of the Oct 6 DRB Hearing for the Garage Expansion project. This is based on the need for additional time required to resolve comments regarding the traffic. Also, this e-mail ;s to confirm that will will be meeting with you and Paul Connor at 2:00 on Wed, Oct 7 at your office. We will also plan on participating in a conference call with you and BFJ at 10:00 on Wed, Oct 14. As discussed, we can hold the conference call in the Airport conference room if that works for you Thank you, Jon Jon Leinwohl, P.E. Associate, Transportation Stantec f;c)t.ith ''Dorifngton VT' Oc;4U;? PW (802) $34-0223 Ext 1 10 t x: (802) £364-016C, Cool!: (802) 734-0446 jo;i, leiriwohl@starite(;, t.ri n stantec.com The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email 10/5/2009 OLWT Interested Persons Record and Service List southburli.maton YkfiMOq'I Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLYI NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST AD - N� t �Qv1iU � ��ns tZ � fir G �- V � S.fz dam+ 66S kkett (4f4alt& edAc r1e!S 5' CACA'L�, '5T �c,5 s�o� a.✓ q Interested Persons Record and Service List ...mow southburl ington vffiMONT Under the 2004-revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: C: \ i 4 . `dl LAO, PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST ! - JIM S$ _ S urn 1 r kt4 4Y'0-Y) %r>ram ' 2 71011"21Aa CI-e L),�- Interested Persons Record and Service List southbi lington v E4W.ONT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: U� PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME 616 P\ij MAILING ADDRESS S' (3'J, I (D v N4-� I I C �S 1, C'(' � r ^ PROJECT OF INTEREST Vc� 'Q- 0 So - ,4�- Y K f/ r Ft�JYV�-PJ� �t�wt.ive M.t'gA �Iv1n�lC� DY. �� �u ��cr 2�� r 6�0�'ocz,•�er� � . ��� Interested Persons Record and Service List southhurlington V E A M 0N7 Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. -§ 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME awl' G . /I DO MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTERES T 5E-�� �r cY c /' (7> b/w HI MST l l �1WA 504c l��c_L__ X�Y' t-4— Zr vote Dr, FGr(f I I p Interested Persons Record and Service List southhurlin ,tn VlRMONT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name; address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: CX— PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! 'LnkJ NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST ll1 E&35or Dr { Y L --, -_------- 3 ---- -- ,�� J� #G_ 2 i t4 `- [-5, 'bdb +444, Vaic M �� Interested Persons Record and Service List ...s+ southbur ington V E0 M ONE Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 1-17, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon - receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: / d - 6 -- O 4 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF iNTERES 21cf Alweod be - Ida 11)4/,je- Se��- 2Io m vJo,,�;'� W �cnrG" "a)aw ss? W(A-- pal) � l D Ml'7 �Q u? - �� P.I�Y /l'1.-czd (-)U)s jn I rC 0 L G IRIS a. ! y Nt"ex-&W� rDti .� ti �N at 1 Ci NJ r—a-r' rye / / ez C4 V, ►q Interested Persons Record and Service List southb rlington Y t H M OUT U; Eder the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S..A..��§ 4471(c). � HEARING DATE: CT (0. �V 1 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTERES r dnof ji-+Mta&wmd&1' I \joaY- UTA 1 +41'Rie4� 3s �tNNgc . V 0 AST W jrs�5 1q'1-W Z-'T. �D8d�c21�' S, 94 1pQ' '90 z r 0 `g,-4�t) A & C REALTY LLC 3017 WILLISTON ROAD LLC C/O OMEGA ELECTRIC ADAMS DONALD L & D LOUISE 3017 WILLISTON RD CONSTRUCTION CO 1265 AIRPORT DR S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 25 OMEGA DR S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 WILLISTON, VT 5407 ADAMS PAUL G ADAMS RONALD C & RUTH A AGWAY PETROLEUM CORP 1215 AIRPORT PKWY 1083 AIRPORT DR BOX 4933 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 SYRACUSE, NY 5407 ASHTON HAROLD 0 & THERESA AUDETTE ROBERT J TRUSTEE AYER PATRICK BRIAN 1195 AIRPORT DR AUDETTE ANNE W TRUSTEE MASLACK AYER TERESE S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 41 PETERSON TERRACE P 0 BOX 9451 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 BACHAND ROBERT J & LORI E BAKER BEVERLY/LOU HENDEE BARNIER SCOTT & BARBARA 68 DUMONT AVE WILLETTE NATALIE E 20 JACKSON ST S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 31 LEONARD ST ESSEX JCT, VT 5407 BURLINGTON, VT 5401 BARRY AGNES F BARRY BRUCE BELTER JOHN H JR & JOYCE N 1387 AIRPORT DR LAROSE DAVID 2 COUNTRY CLUB DR S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 1907 WILLISTON RD S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 BERGER RUSSELL G III BLOW MALCOM D & RECECCA J BOARDMAN WILLIAM M & CYNTHIA CABELL RICHARD L D 449 WHITE ST 615 AIRPORT PKWY S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 42 LOGWOOD STREET S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 BOUFFARD NORMAND & BOVE PETER R REAL EST PRTNP BRESNAHAN PHILLIP W III & KARE MARGARET C/O JOHNSON KATHLEEN ST 65 DUMONT AVE 2020 CRESTVIEW WAY 448 WHITE S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 NAPLES, FL 5407 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 BRUECKNER ROBERT D & BRUSOE ALAN L BUNKOFSKE RAYMOND J & MARY B ROSEMARIE SOUTIERE ANN M 137 CO CLUB DR 451 WHITE ST 11 MAYFAIR ST S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 BURT RUSSELL & KAREN L CALKINS LELAND E & PATRICIA C CAMERON PATRICIA A & WILLIAM T 141 COUNTRY CLUB DR E 1835 SPEAR STREET 1247 AIRPORT DR S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 CARTER RICHARD G & MARION E CHAMBERS RENT A CAR CHAPPEL JOHN F III 165 AIRPORT PKWY P 0 BOX 859 PO BOX 1072 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 AUGUSTA, ME 5407 BURLINGTON, VT 5407 l CHASE THOMAS E CHURCHILL DWIGHT F & ANN H BARRY MICHAEL E 64 DUMONT AVE 29 BERARD DRIVE S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 DALEY KENNETH A & CAROLE DALTON WILLIAM D & BETTY A 1227 AIRPORT DR 1383 AIRPORT DR S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 DEFORGE GARY J DEGRECHIE BEVERLY A 32 DUMONT AVE 24 LOGWOOD ST S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 DEROBERTIS MARC A DOERING ROBERT W & LORRIE M 1185 AIRPORT DR 1089 AIRPORT DR. S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 EMMONS ROGER A & ANNA M FARGNOLI ASSOCIATES LLC 1085 AIRPORT DR 21 POINT FARM WEST S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 GRAND ISLE, VT 5407 FOLEY JOHN F & JOAN B FRANCO MICHAEL N & JUDITH M 60 DUMONT AVE 120 AIRPORT PKWY S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 GLASER TOM P & JILL F HAYES BRIAN G & SUSAN L 272 WINDMILL BAY 22 LOGWOOD ST SHELBURNE, VT 5407 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 HENRY MAUREEN C HOBBS JAMES E & SHERRIE L C/O THE MEDICAL STORE LTD 16 LOGWOOD ST 1225 AIRPORT PARKWAY S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 JAQUES BURTON E REV LIVING JOY JOSHUA TRUSTEE TRUST FOR TRISTAN CUNNINGHAM 519 SHORE ACRES DR 31 DUMONT AVE COLCHESTER, VT 5446 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 KNOFF WILLIAM C KRUGER REBECCA B, DOUGLAS B 1 ELIZABETH ST KRUGER JON C, MARK A S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 1233 AIRPORT DR S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 CLIFTON DAVID L & MARY W P 0 BOX 9476 S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 DEAVITT ALBERTA 1375 AIRPORT DR S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 DEGRECHIE PAUL R & MICHELLE M 199 KIRBY RD S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 DUHAMEL YVETTE 1 30 LOGWOOD ST S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 FINNIGAN MICHAEL J & JOANNE J 34 LOGWOOD ST S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 GARVEY EDWARD W & PATRICIA G 44 DUMONT AVE S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 HENNIGAR HOLDINGS LLC 805 EAST HILLSBORO BLVD. DEERFIELD BEACH, FL 33441 INVESTORS CORP OF VT SUITE 401 30 MAIN ST BURLINGTON, VT 5407 KINVILLE PETER A & DONNA S 11 SOUTH HENRY CT S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 LACEYS INC. 2000 WILLISTON ROAD S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 C LAPLANTE BERNARD J 1181 AIRPORT DR S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 LEISURE WORLD INC LINDA B LAROW 1245 AIRPORT PKWY S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 LOSO HARRY J & DIANE M 53 MARYLAND ST S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 LAWARE MICHAEL J & DAWN M 47 MARYLAND ST S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 LEMAY JOSEPH H & BARBARA 1 1379 AIRPORT DRIVE S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 MAILLE GEORGE A JR & CHARLENE 38 LOGWOOD ST S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 LEGROW DAVID K 396 WHITE ST S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 LNP INC 300 CORNERSTONE DRIVE WILLISTON, VT 5495 MANAZIR THEODORE & CHRISTINA 129 COUNTRY CLUB DR E S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 MAXWELL KIM S METHOT DAVID F & RACHEL V MILLIKEN CAROLINE B 1261 AIRPORT DR 57 DUMONT AVE 133 COUNTRY CLUB DR E S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 MUNSON EARTH MOVING CORP MOFFATT MICHAEL A C/O SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY MUNSON RANDALL G 1253 AIRPORT DR CO. 366 DORSET STREET S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 PO BOX 2204 S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 O'BRIEN DANIEL J & LEO J JR C/O EXXON MOBIL CORP PO BOX 4973 HOUSTON, TX 5407 PICKERING RODNEY A. & LISA J 184 KIRBY RD S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 PLOOF DAVID W JR 77 DUMONT AVE S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 ROBENSTEIN ROBERT J 2 LEDOUX TERR S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 O'BRIEN DANIEL J & LEO J JR P 0 BOX 2184 S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 PIERCE SANDRA M 72 DUMONT AVE S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 PROULX GERARD E & SUSAN F 1155 AIRPORT DR S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 ROONEY WALDEN J & DARLA A 5 MT VIEW BLVD S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 PALMER ALAN D & CHRISTINE L 2169 DORSET STREET SHELBURNE, VT 5407 PIZZA PUTT INC 1205 AIRPORT PARKWAY S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 ROBAR PAUL L JR & JANICE M 196 KIRBY RD S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 RUSSELL JOHN A & LYNN A 1161 WILLISTON RD S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S M S REALTY PARTNERSHIP SCHMITT W ERIC & BONNIE S SCRIGGINS GENEVA B DAVID A MCGINNIS 13 DUMONT AVE 420 WHITE ST 4016 WILLISTON RD S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON. VT 5407 r SEAFOX INC SHAND ROBERT M SHAND ROBERT M & LYNDA A 8 CALKINS COURT 5 ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE 5 ETHAN ALLEN DR S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 SHELBURNE SHIPYARD SHEPARD GARY F & BETTY JOAN SHIP SEVIN LLC P 0 BOX 610 1 PATRICK ST C/O KEVIN SPILLANE SHELBURNE, VT 5407 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 334 TAMARACK SHORES SHELBURNE, VT 5482 SORRELL ROBBIN L & MARLENE R SPRANO ROBERTA M ST JOHN VIANNEY HOME ASSN 37 DUMONT AVENUE 392 WHITE ST C/O KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 P 0 BOX 9214 S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 SWEET LEIGH M & ELLEN F SZWAJA MARIAN & SOPHIE TATRO SAM E SR & ALBERTA M 148 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST 1 BUTLER DRIVE 38 DUMONT AVE S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 THIBAULT LEONARD E TILLEY FRANCES R TIMBERLAKE ASSOCIATES THIBAULT DOROTHY F 1141 AIRPORT DR WALTER E SIMENDINGER 1184 REYNOLDS RD S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 32 SAN REMO DRIVE ST ALBANS, VT 5478 S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 TODISCO ANTONIO & ANNA TRUSTEE TRI-D III LLC WARD EUGENE J III ANTONIO&ANNA TODISCO REV MAZUT DONNA L TRUST 15 TIGAN STREET 3069 WILLISTON RD 71 LAKEWOOD PARKWAY WINOOSKI, VT 5404 S BURLINGTON, VT 5407 BURLINGTON, VT 5407 WRIGHT WILLIAM G & LORETTA M 11 DUMONT AVE S BURLINGTON, VT 5403 South Burlin ton Fire De artment g P 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4110 Fax (802) 846-4125 August 5, 2009 Mr. Ray Belair, City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Airport Parking Lot Expansion Dear Ray: I have reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of the additional levels to the parking structure at Burlington International Airport. 1. Compliance with all requirements of the Vermont Division of Fire Safety codes and standards. 2. Upgrade of any fire protection systems such as sprinklers, standpipes, or fire alarms as required by Vermont Division of Fire Safety. 3. If any additional Fire Department Connections are added the location is to be specified by SBFD. 4. If any additional fire alarm panels or enunciators are added the location is to be specified by SBFD. 5. The Fire Chief should be contacted when nearing project completion for familiarization, safety, and cautionary training for emergency response personnel regarding a solar electricity project of this magnitude. 6. Provisions should be included in this project for upgrade of the South Burlington Fire Department emergency response communication system. As the airport campus has been expanded upon, our fire and emergency medical services radio communications capabilities have been compromised. Radio signal strength and broadcast ability is directly affected by mass such as the continued addition of brick, concrete, concrete block and steel. Radio signal coverage within the structures at the airport is spotty or absent in numerous areas. In discussions with our communications vendor the addition of a device called a "bi-directional amplifier" would correct this problem. This device is a type of radio signal repeater. 7. During construction keep all emergency access points open and do not block fire lanes or hydrants. Page - 2 At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves forward additional items may surface which could be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the property owner representatives and the Division of Fire Safety. Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact me. m erely,� Douglas S. Brent Fire Chief South Burlington .Public Works 576 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 TEL: (802)656-7961 FAX: (002)658-7876 Of FK;F 104 LnNDVILL RG November 12, 2010 To: Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator From: Bruce K. Hoar, Director of Public Works RE: Burlington international Airport Parking Garage Expansion Jon Leinwohl of Stantec Consulting has presented on behalf of the Airport a recommended bond value for Airport Drive. The expansion of the Parking Facility will require multiple loads well in excess of what are the legal load limits for this road therefore requiring that the Airport bond for damages to our infrastructure. Jon has been to Public Works on two occasions to work out the details for a bond. I feel that the methodology used to achieve the proposed bond number to be accurate and find the amount, $81,667, appropriate for this project. The agreement should be written along the same lines as the one dated November 14, 2003. The road should be surveyed both before and after the project The city should be the sole entity that makes the final decision on what the damages are if any at the end of this project in regards to using the bonded money. Also the Airport should be held responsible for any damage to Airport Drive during the life of the project. The Airport will be responsible for the realignment of three crosswalks along this route. As such they will be responsible for everything that goes into any construction for the realignment. The City will still supply and install the LED Crosswalk hardware that has been approved through the Enhancement Grant that has already been approved. � Cf) X-wv, �c 10"f r/f�1 Burlington International Airport � Parking Garage Expansion Stantec 2012 Estimated Costs for Resurfacing Airport Drive from Williston 55 Green Mountain Drive Road to the Airport Circle Exit South Burlington, VT05403 Calculation for Determining Bond Value Related to Construction Tel: (802) 864-0223 Vehicle Damage Fax: (802) 864-0165 11 /2/2009 Jon Leinwohl 1. Estimated 2012 cost of milling; 3" overlay; and pavement markings = $245,000 (see attached quantity and unit prices). 2. Airport Drive last resurfaced in 2002. So. Burlington DPW uses 15 year life cycle for street resurfacing. Next resurfacing due in 2017. 3. 2017 - 2012 = 5 years of life remaining when Airport garage expansion project is completed in 2012. 4. Recommended Bond value: $245,000 x 1/3 remaining pavement life = $81,667. Assumptions: 1) The condition of Airport Drive will be assessed by the Airport prior to beginning construction of the parking garage expansion and again at the conclusion of construction. The Airport's responsibility for payment of improvements to Airport Drive shall be limited to repairing damage caused by construction vehicle traffic associated with the garage expansion project. 2) Inflation factor of 4% per year used to project costs. Estimate: / { Vermont Agency of Transportation Line # Item Number ` Quantity Units Unit Price Extension Description Supplemental Description Group 2011: Initial Group 0005 210.10 12,200.000 SY $4.92645 $60,102.69 COLD PLANING, BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 0006 404.65 51.000 CWT $139.16814 $7,097.58 EMULSIFIED ASPHALT 0007 406.25 2,040.000 TON $75.00000 $153,000.00 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT 0009 646.20 580.000 LF $1.14089 $661.72 4 INCH WHITE LINE 001.0 646.21 6,450:000 LF $0,48984 $3,159.47 4 INCH YELLOW LINE' 0011 646.26 46.000 LF $6.14893 $282.85 24 INCH STOP BAR 0012 646.39, 42:009', ,EACH. $.1.9.47196 . $817.82 LETT817 Qk SYMBOL 0014 646.31 224.000 LF $4.42441 $991.07 CROSSWALK MARKING (?'AGh1 $2,49.613;$,3P,, 61 Total for Group 2011:$226,506.81 Using an inflation rate of 4% per year, the projected cost in 2012 is: $245,000.00 1:48:45PM Monday, November 02, 2009 Page 2 of 2 ITEMS 646.20-646.76 Burlington International Airport Paving Airport Drive Striping Quantities Stantec als Date 55 Green Mountain Drive Calc�d C 10/29/2009 South Burlington, VT 05403 Checke +By Tel: (802) 864-0223 ReviseFax: (802) 864-0165 Checke Item No. 646.20 - 4 Inch White Line Item No. 646.21 - 4 Inch Yellow Line Item No. 646.26 - 24 Inch Stop Bar Item No. 646.30 - Letter or Symbol Item No. 646.31 - Crosswalk Marking Subtotal 573 LF [Rounding 7 LF TOTAL= 500. ,LF Subtotal 6426 LF Roundin 24 LF f TOT Subtotal 45 LF Roundin 1 LF TOTAL -`' 46 LF' Subtotal 42 EACH lRounding 0 EACH Subtotal 222 LF Roundin 2 LF , �-TOT L=� 24-' LF Item No. 646.76 - Line Striping Targets Per STP Guidelines use spacing of 40', or 20' on sharp curves (D > 7deg 30 min) (Assume only centerline is required) Total Length of 4" Yellow Line = 6450 LF Subtotal 161 LF Roundin 1 LF r,.;,.y,","Tg7Al�'i¢`•r;"f`,�.'.162;,^ �LF.x. ,. V \1953\active\195310247V\irport Drive Crosswalks\Quantity Calculations As 1 of 1 11/10/20092 41 PM l Quantity Calculation ITEM 406.25 ' Burlington International Airport Bituminous Concrete Paving Airport Drive Pavement StanteC Initials Date 55 Green Mountain Drive Calc'd By: AHC 10/29/2009 South Burlington, VT 05403 Checked By Tel: (802) 864-0223 Revised By Fax: (802) 864-0165 Checked By: Item Nn_ 4OR_25 - Bituminous Cnncrete Pavement Assume a 1" Leveling Course and a 2" Wearing Course Roadway Type III 2"= 0.166667 FT TONS Total Area of Type III Wearing Course 12,122.0 SY 673.4 CY 1346.9 Type IV 1"= 0.083333 FT Total Area of Type IV Leveling Course 12,122.0 SY 336.7 CY 673.4 MAINLINE WEARING COURSE = 1,346.9 TONS LEVELING COURSE = 673.4 TONS Subtotal 2020.3 TO Rounding 19.7 TO TQTAL;,4p,6 Y5 �:.8(tii til ,ti,us" t2 c� tip?F?,aVr6imioiiv +w.,,,' 2040 TON V \1953\active\195310247\Airport Drive Crosswalks\Quantity Calculations.xls 11/10/2009 2:41 PM CI F Quantity Calculation ITEM 404.65 Burlington International Airport Paving Airport Drive Emulsified Asphalt Stantec Initials Date 55 Green Mountain Drive Calc'd By AHC 10/30/2009 South Burlington, VT 05403 Checked By: Tel: (802) 864-0223 Revised By - Fax: (802) 864-0165 Checked By: Item No. 404.65 - Emulsitied Asphalt Mainline Area Application 1 12,122 SY Application 2 12,122 SY Total 24,244 SY Per STP Guidelines use application rate of 0.025 gal/sy and 8.3 Ibs/gal to compute hundred weight 606 gal 100 Ibs/Hundred Weight (CWT) 50.3 CWT Subtotal 50.3 CWT Rounding 0.7 CWT TOTAL Item,No; 404:65,i Elrnuisifiedi4sphllti;,�,,? 51, .CWT V-\1953\active\195310247\Airport Drive Crosswalks\Quantity CalculationsAs 11/10/2009 2:41 PM := Quantity Calculation ITEM 210.10 Burlington International Airport Cold Planing, Bituminous Paving Airport Drive Pavement �`Jta1 tec Initials Date 55 Green Mountain Drive Calc'd By. AHC 10/29/2009 South Burlington, VT 05403 Checked By Tel: (802) 864-0223 Revised By - Fax: (802) 864-0165 Checked By: Item No. 210.10 Cold Planina. Bituminous Pavpmnnt Mainline Areas Route Airport Drive Mainline Subtotal = Subtotal Area 12122.0 SY 12122.0 SY Subtotal Cold Plane Area = 12,122 SY lRounding 78 SY TOTAL: Item,,,No:';2 ,"0>'1';0'i:Cd,d? V.\1953\active\195310247\Aupott Drive Crosswalks\Quantity CalculationsAs 11/10/20092 41 PM ' r Memo Stantec To: Ray Belair, , From: David DeBaie Administrative Officer John Leinwohl City of South Burlington Stantec Consulting Services 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel: 802-864-0223 Fax: 802-864-0165 File:195310247 Date: December 11, 2009 Reference: BTV 2009 Traffic Study - ROW costs in relation to Alternative Improvements to Williston Road and Airport Drive This memo provides responses to the South Burlington Planning Department regarding' Right of Way (ROW) costs associated with alternative improvements of the Williston - - Road and Airport Drive Intersection. In a December 10, 2009 memo, Stantec provided graphic illustrations of alternate improvements to the intersection to meet the existing and future No Build deficiencies for the City of South Burlington as part of the Design Review Board approval process for the proposed expansion of the Airport garage. A traffic study was prepared in 2009 for the purpose of identifying impacts. This information complements that provided in the December 10, 2009 memo. The purpose of this information is to provide a representation of the ROW costs that is consistent with the opinion of improvement cost associated with the general idea of adding lanes to specific approaches to improve the existing deficient capacity. Detailed design has not been done and therefore the ROW requirements and actual value are general. �rv<<I The applied basis of land value is $277,000 per acre. This is an average of actual ; residential property transactions on Airport Drive during 2009. The ROW requirements of the alternative improvements are not residential properties but rather commercial properties. No attempt has been made to judge the relative value in terms of the use or the location of the required properties. The applied ROW / property lines are also the best information available. The ROW lines are from a public GIS resource. That resource appears to be the same as used for the recently completed Route 2 (Williston Road) corridor study prepared by the CCMPO. Graphic illustrations in the Final Report of that Study available on the CCMPO website indicates that the existing northernmost westbound Route 2 roadway lies outside the ROW. This situation may or may not be real however based on the available One Team. Infinite Solutions. jbl c.\documents and selbngs\lleinwohl\local settngs\temporary intemetfiles\olklb\121109 memo (2).doc r � 1 Stantec December 11, 2009 Page 2 of 2 Reference: BTV 2009 Traffic Study - ROW costs in relation to Alternative Improvements to Williston Road and Airport Drive information the assumption is that this existing ROW need is included in the overall need for each alternative. The Table below illustrates the ROW needs for the Alternative Improvements described in the December 10, 2009 memo. Airport Ownership Other Ownership Total Acreage Value Acreage Value Acreage Value Existing* 0.165 $45,705 0.010 $2,770 0.175 $48,475 Alternative A 0.223 $61,771 0.010 $2,770 0.233 $64,451 Alternative B 0.223 $61,771 0.010 $2,770 0.233 $64,451 Alternative C 0.331 $91,687 0.010 $2,770 0.341 $94,457 *The existing westb and Route 2 roadway and sidewalk east of the intersection Iles outside the ROW. Iternatives A, B and C include this existing need. C/ U �✓ � l � `/ D � aUv DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 15 SEPTEMBER 2009 PAGE 6 Mr. Maille asked about the setback from the property line. Mr. Belair said the requirement is 30 feet from the rear property line. The proposal is for 20 feet. Mr. Maille asked if the butternut tree would come down. Mr. Lawrence said it will not. Mr. Deslauriers asked if the living wall material is approved to take a constant blasting from jet noise. Mr. Lawrence said it will be farther back from the big street trees on that street. Mr. Worthen stressed that this is a demonstration project. It was noted that the designation of "Main St." in the approval motion should be amended to read "Airport Drive." Ms. Quimby moved to approve Conditional Use Application #CU-09-08 of City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. ontinued Site Plan Application #SD-09-63 of Burlington International Air o construct two additional parking lots to an existing three level parking garage to accommodate 1370 vehicles, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Leinwohl revi, wed the outstanding issues. One of these is traffic, and Mr. Leinwohl said they got comments from the city's traffic consultant on Friday and will have a response back to the City later in the week. Regarding a parking needs assessment, Mr. Leinwohl said there will still be a need to utilize overflow parking areas. Ms. La Rose said staff would like a narrative regarding other options that are being pursued (e.g., public transit). Mr. Belair added staff would like an estimate of how many parking spaces are needed. Regarding pedestrian crossing on Airport Drive, Mr. Leinwohl said they identified a number of crosswalks that need improvement. They will consult with the Public Works Director and work something out. Mr. Dinklage stressed that crossings on Airport Drive are not adequate today. Mr. Leinwohl said they have determined that the existing ramp system is adequate to handle the expansion. They are putting together a new signage plan and a new lighting plan. Mr. Behr suggested the Airport provide some means for people to identify where in the parking garage they left their vehicles. Regarding toll booth capacity, Mr. Leinwohl said there are 4 booths today. Two are attended, and two are automated. The automated ones are under -used and can have staff added to them to handle additional traffic. Mr. Behr asked whether 2 additional floors were anticipated in the garage design. Mr. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 15 SEPTEMBER 2009 PAGE 7 Leinwohl said the southern half was not designed for additional floors and will require a lot of work. The northern half was designed for additional floors. Mr. Behr asked if there would be future requests for additional expansion of parking. Mr. McEwing said they have to look at additional ways to accommodate people at the Airport over the next 5-10 years. They don't want to continue to build garages. Mr. Paris said they are looking at a 2030 planning horizon, and the 3.2 growth rate they are using is the one approved by the FAA. They will respond to the City's consultant on that. Regarding the height waiver, members indicted they were OK with that. Ms. Emery asked whether the higher structure might help abate noise from the Airport. Mr. Dinklage felt it might in a very limited way. Mr. Young asked about storm water issues. Mr. Leinwohl said all runoff from the garage is collected and goes into the city's treatment plant ... He did not feel additional capacity would be needed, but he would check on that. Mr. Belair felt they were all set on the landscape requirement. The Board was OK with the plans on the roof counting toward the requirement. Mr. Leinwohl said there would be no light spillage from the property. They will use down casting fixtures on the outside of the building. Ms. Quimby then moved to continue Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 of Burlington International Airport until 6 October 2009. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-37 of David Krag for a planned unit development to convert an accessory residential unit to a single family dwelling on a lot which is also developed with a single family dwelling, 250 Spear Street: Mr. Krag said he purchased the property 5 years ago to help their son. They converted an accessory building into an accessory apartment. They want to keep the property long- term and need to downsize. They therefore want to sell the accessory building, and the way to do that is to make it into a condominium (single family dwelling). There will be no changes to the property except ownership. Mr. Dinklage said it will be very different. The backyard will be only 10 feet deep. The residents may want a swing set, etc. Mr. Krag said they can do that now. There are no other houses near there because of a steep slope. Mr. Dinklage asked if there could be an addition to the accessory building. Mr. Belair said they are at the coverage limit and it would not meet the setback. Interested Persons Record and Service List southhur ington VEFMON7 Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: Sd ' 1�4 ra667 01 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST V-\ \1(0 a ,I 010 -7 o LL (0 �v ► l��1�'� -t" 33 kyol (C%r 3 A I &&"A 1 A � s I deffi. Interested Persons Record and Service List southburlingto" v tP M0 N7 Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST S-k Moro Soli? F- 0 t dRay Sa. Bu �V-",60uzos �> 1bok GmvL( cam'-'r YYj&i/ f.T r?-' Ci>0A44te- Wets dV -�( �, �,,j tjo.eY. tCmc— w,1 z urn 50 old '--b-rM dot —8 %y-U, i' ��' 2LOrJ G, � S �� z_ S/�2 r S c�N� ���rr4air7 M/f � • U G � �/�/� /"��V Interested Persons Record and Service List W 10 southburlinglon V E A M 0 NT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTERE31' '01a: o SP&4-e- S7; I South{ijurlington Fire Depar(I cent 575 Dorset Street ,`south Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4110 Douglas S. Brent, Fire Chief August 5, 2009 Mr. Ray Belair, City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Airport Parking Lot Expansion Dear Ray: I have reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of the additional levels to the parking structure at Burlington International Airport. 1. Compliance with all requirements of the Vermont Division of Fire Safety codes and standards. 2. Upgrade of any fire protection systems such as sprinklers, standpipes, or fire alarms as required by Vermont Division of Fire Safety. 3. If any additional Fire Department Connections are added the location is to be specified by SBFD. 4. If any additional fire alarm panels or enunciators are added the location is to be specified by SBFD. 5. The Fire Chief should be contacted when nearing project completion for familiarization, safety, and cautionary training for emergency response personnel regarding a solar electricity project of this magnitude. 6. Provisions should be included in this project for upgrade of the South Burlington Fire Department emergency response communication system. As the airport campus has been expanded upon, our fire and emergency medical services radio communications capabilities have been compromised. Radio signal strength and broadcast ability is directly affected by mass such as the continued addition of brick, concrete, concrete block and steel. Radio signal coverage within the structures at the airport is spotty or absent in numerous areas. In discussions with our communications vendor the addition of a device called a "bi-directional amplifier" would correct this problem. This device is a type of radio signal repeater. 7. During construction keep all emergency access points open and do aot block fire lanes or hydrants. J Page - 2 At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves forward additional items may surface which could be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the property owner representatives and the Division of Fire Safety. Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact me. Sin erely, Q-T, Douglas S. Brent Fire Chief CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: September 11, 2009 \drb\sit\burlington_airport\living_wall.doc Application received: July 17, 2009 CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION #SP-09-08 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Meeting date: September 15, 2009 Owner/Applicant Property Information City of Burlington Residential 4 Zoning District 1200 Airport Drive, #1 S. Burlington, VT 05403 Location Ma CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlington airport\livingwall doc Burlington International Airport, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking site plan approval to install a living wall to extend 13 feet in height, 1151 and 1153 Airport Drive. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Raymond Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans and have the following comments: Pursuant to Section 13.17 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDR), a fence over eight (8) feet in height shall require approval by the Development Review Board as a conditional use subject to the provisions of Article 14, Conditional Use Review. Pursuant to Section 14.10(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations the proposed conditional use shall meet the following standards: 1. The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. The fence is proposed to be used as an experimental sound buffer between the airport and the adjacent neighborhood. The wall as proposed is only 115 feet long at this time. This does not conflict with the planned character of the area and the existing uses in the area, but rather its intended purpose is to provide an aesthetic and functional barrier. Information on this wall is attached in this packet which should better attest to conformance with this criterion. 2. The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located. The fence will be the only structure on the property at this time. The addition of the fence will not detract from that use or the stated purpose of the Residential 4 Zoning District. 3. The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. The proposal will not adversely affect municipal services. (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. While this is indeed a unique structure, staff believes that the proposal is in keeping with the character of uses on surrounding properties and will not adversely affect the character of the area or the ability to develop adjacent properties. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. There will be no increased traffic based on the installation of this fence. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlington airport\livingwall.doc (d) Bylaws in effect. The fence as proposed will require a rear yard setback waiver of 10 feet; see below for a discussion on this item. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposal will not affect renewable energy resources. (0 General public health and welfare. Staff does not believe that the proposal will have an adverse affect on general public welfare or the health of the surrounding public. Conversely, its very intent is to better the welfare of the adjacent neighbors. Pursuant to Section 13.17 of the SBLDR, a fence over eight (8) feet in height shall be considered a structure subject to normal setback requirements for the zoning district, unless otherwise approved by the Development Review Board as a conditional use. The proposed fence is 8 feet high on a 5 foot berm, for a total height of 13 feet and is proposed to be located twenty (20) feet from the rear yard property line. The setbacks in the district require a ten foot setback to the side, and 30 feet to the rear. Therefore the applicant is seeking a rear yard setback waiver for the fence of ten (10) feet. Staff supports this waiver. 1. The Board shall consider the applicant's request for a rear yard setback waiver of ten (10) feet. Staff supports the application and recommends that the Development Review Board approve Conditional Use application #CU-09-08 subject to the numbered conditional items. Res ectfully Submitted, athya LaRose, Associa a Planner show Video Green Toronto awards Winner of: 00 Kr REEK T M'N AWAR iYi4 I:s1Y C1f fl')Vf7.tilil S f N�INONF011 NuAt AYJAQO-. yr txt-t UNCL i show Video The Green Living Show The Living Wall is a sound attenuation/privacy screening solution that incorporates ecological principals with engineering practices. The vegetation used in The Living Wall, willow shrubs native to Canada and the US, has the ability to grow rapidly and thus provides an almost instant landscape. The construction is carefully planned to ensure the controlled growth of roots and shoots. As the vegetation spreads over it's biodegradable wooden framework, it matures into an integrated unit that is able to withstand harsh winters and hot summers; maintaining it's aesthetic appeal in all seasons. The Living Wall naturalizes urban and rural environments while providing superior sound absorption and a substantial privacy structure. It is an organic manufacture that has enormous environmental benefits including: photosynthesis, pollution filtration, and soil stabilization. The Living Wall is 100% recyclable! It is appropriate for large and small-scale usages such as commercial, parkland, and highway installations, as well as individual residential lots. The Living Wall Is available in two applications privacy screen fence and sound barrier with soil. M -'T--�' � 22' T E45ting Cedar Fence To Remain Ex15ting Lawn To Remain WAlfsm M. & Cyrdhla D. Bowdmsn Z° 0 r Remove Ex. A5rh. Pave Replace with 4' To4, i1 * 5e d 329'-n Gerald &Susan PAVED J`•33 PAVED Drip Irriggation Line �. Both 51de5 of aH \ See Section Living Wall L-3 East Face Living Wall \ �. 1 15 ft. long ` SHED ` Dead G" Tree to be Removed —F _ 18' 15'+ _i--�- I GI+ Dimension Plan 1 "= 20' U R L I N G T O N U T H B U R L_ _I N T O N V Ex Cedar Fence To Remain - SaoneA Jr. 8 C ww* 1 N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L M O N T 1 1 51 & 1 153 AIRPORT DRIVE LIVING WALL SITE DIMENSION & GRADING PLAN OWNER - BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - 1200AIRPORT DRIVE -SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT - MICHAEL LAWRENCE AS L A - ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05453 S T A H T E C CONSULTING ENGINEERS -SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT Existing Lawn To Remain f Gradinc L-2 1 "=20' Plan I R P O R T Existing lawn To Remain #1153 �S ' .15 ac. �`�1' u 1 .3 e � G' Rose Sh ub To Rema .AMP 12 330 t ; 1 s 1 200MAPL \ o i To Remain d #1151 1 .17 sc. in ' WMAPLE m 1 To Remain , PAVED 30 SH 34"MAPLE -�%- To ain To Remain 330�S METER HOUSE '� Frances R. rney Temporary I " Polyethelene Water Pipe LEGEND 332' Existing contour —333 — New contour ,L 334 New 5pot Elevation Property Line Q Existing Tree to Remain 30"ASH GLL Grading Limit tine N. Existing Asph. Asphalt Section Number 5heet Number 3 Elevation Number 5heetNumber RIM 329.99' Temporary 5/5" Water Meter 6ackflow preventer Buried timer VED OVER �" Remove Ex. Asph. Pavt. Replace with 4" Topsoil * Seed DATE: AUG. 24.2009 SCALE: 1"=20' ��^� 0 20' 40' GRAPHIC SCALE DRAWN: MCL Vanee 19 - ar� l 7gdNW I I IwwyMhl 1 ►iW M 6 2%awl Slope t [El. 331 ' El. 330 El. 328 I EI" 329.0 Proposed Grade Exi5tmg Grade Exl5ting Grade 5idewalk �I� Section throug5batmMWall from West Property Line to Airport Drive Lookinci North L-4/ Scale I /5"= I `-O" Q 2.5 m I Native Sal Cross Section Detail Scale I /4"= I'-O" Willow Rod 2x4 Croce Brace Willow Rod w 1-2' dram. Threaded Rod with Bolt 2x4 Top Rai Geotextlle Humus 4x4 Post 4x4 Wood Support Posts (8 ft. oc) rM'ii�• ev 2x4 Cross Brace Threaded Rod with Bolt 2x4 Bottom Rail Perforated Irrigation Hose •�r a: "`t. finished Grade 4' Topsoil - lawn h Livinq Wall Existing Grade Native Soil Compacted fill E3 URLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT S O U T H B U R L i N T O N, V E R M O N T 1 151 & 1 153 AIRPORT DRIVE LIVING WALL DETAILS OWNER - BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - I200AIRPORT DRIVE - SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT - MICHAEL LAWRENCE AS L A - ESSEX JUNCTION. VERMONT 05453 S TA NT EC CONSU LT.INR ENGINEERS • SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT Triple Mix Native Soil or Compacted fill Scale I /4"= P-O" h Living Wall 4x4 Curb Airport Drive El. 330 .,-„- Rode d 2' Apart a Refs Detail Plan of Living Wall E - -k4 r UG. 24, 2009 As NOTED MCI CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate-compliancwwith the -applicable criteria. 24-V.S.-A. § 4461(b).-The DRB must keep a -written record: -of the -name,- addresssand--participation of each- person who has sought -interested -person- status.- 24-V.S.A. § 4461(b). A -copy of any decision - rendered by the DRB must be -mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. §. 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24,V.S.A. ,§ 4471(c). HEARING DATE: 4Y4146T IS PA I MT r (f4IL\t NAME' ' `" - '' ' MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST is ) b4 MA1 ST. CDL. ltwl tr) — a" v�►rl►s�o�, ,,To-�� _ Rdl 10 Knoll Cc i CUL �p/� / 7 4/7 PoRrt-2 f P61&)-r ��nmE-YZ rit'ZJ �.� 5 kl-"JA45� V CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a, written record of the name, address -and participation -of each person who has sought -interested person status: 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every -person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEA G DATE: AA& l& O OT CFW-Y E NA MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST C Vr OS�5-Y Y pa✓ • %J Pi!' h e- � � � Yv � ar�� •-- T %.fir du,� 1 ('l a /" WA /C / 16) 1,31,2�GL cvod & 3Z-5 -DrYSo-+ I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: NAP] Cl MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST vtrC IBV-o A� 000- 1prnn��r0i) )A-rT, rlW, V0h-n,.r r 14J o 1 � -'�Er 5-56- zec*-) 81 MIS PUE -,T �(,� I f 1 -4-f, r,� - ` l 1 5�k'-Ie +2 3 '�O✓Ye+ Sive e+ i 25— f CklyeArr�ol` Cotc�y , V-1r fl54a3 1S'er,�kywc% C— Permit Number Sp- - 6 CITY OF SOUTH BUFLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Cityoof Burlington, Burlington International Airport, 1200 Airport Drive, #1, South Burlington, VT 05403, Phone: 802-863-2874, Fax: 802-863-7947 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 13, Page 271 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same as 1) 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Robert A. McEwing, Director of Planning & Development; e-mail: RMccwin�,,(&btv.aero• Mailing address, phone, and fax # same as 1) Jon Leinwohl, P.E., Stantec Consulting, 55 Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403; e-mail: ion. leinwohl(Dstantec.com: Phone: 802-864-0223, x 110; Fax: 802-864-0165 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1200 Airport Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 2000 OOOOC', 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) The overall project site is approximately 8.4 acres located on the Burlington International Airport property. It presently serves as an existing three level parking garage (-4.9 acres). An existing paved parking lot (-0.8 acres) located adjacent to the northerly end of the parking garage will be used for construction staging operations. Existing grass and landscaped areas adjacent to the south east, and west sides of the parking garage will also be impacted during construction (-2.7 acres). b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) No changes in the use of the site are proposed. The project involves expanding the parking structure vertically to accommodate an additional 1370 vehicles by adding two parking levels. Three floors will be added to the existing elevator tower/vestibule and to the existing east and west stairway towers. Two floors will be added to the existing north and south stairway towers. A roof will cover the upper level of the parking garage with 11.3% of the area being a green area available for seasonal public access, and 88.7% of the roof being used for photovoltaic panels to generate power. The proposed addition to the parkinggarage2 floors totaling ± 432,734 g.s.f.) will also include associated mechanical systems and lighting. Site work will be limited to restoration of disturbed areas. Landscaping plans for the green roof and for restoration of the existing site are attached to this application. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) The existing building footprint is 216,367 s.f. and an addition of 75 s.f. is proposed. The existing building is three floors (around level plus two levels above round), ± 649,101 g.s.f. The proposed addition will add ± 432,734 g.s.f., for a total of ± 1,081,835 g.s.f. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) The maximum height of the existing_ parking garage is 36'-8". The maximum height of the proposed building expansion, (i.e. two additional floors, roof, and stair tower with enclosed cellular antenna) will be 77'-0". Small wind turbines (I V-6" high) are also proposed atop the garage resulting in a maximum height of 88'-6" above ground level. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not applicable. f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): The existing number of airport employees is approximately 500. Employment growth is expected to include 3 additional staff as a result of this project. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 1. South Burlington Land Development Regulation Section 3.07, F addresses height waivers in the AIR district. It says "For structures proposed to exceed the maximum height for structures specified in 0.07(D) above as part of a planned unit development or master plan (which applies to the Airport), the Development Review Board may waive the requirements of this section as long as the general objectives of the applicable zoning district are met. A request for approval of a taller structure shall include the submittal of a Plan(s) showing the elevations and architectural design of the structure, pre -construction grade, post construction grade, and height of the structure. Such plan shall demonstrate that the proposed building will not detract from important public scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way." The applicant is requesting a waiver of the maximum height restriction under this section. Building plans, elevations, and photo renderings of the proposed expansion are provided with this application demonstrating compliance with the waiver criteria. It is noted that: - The green roof will provide a park like setting where the public can enjoy views of the mountains and airport - The heavily wooded areas between Airport Drive and development to the west of the airport will limit public view of the parking garage. - The existing parking structure presently obscures airport and mountain views from public roadways. Construction of the additional floors will not result in further loss of these views. 2. The project consists of two major landscape components: A. Transplant -Storage -Replanting: Construction of two new levels of parking and roof requires the use of a large crane. The design team has consulted with an erection contractor to determine optimum crane placements adjacent to the garage keeping in mind a goal of minimizing any loss of trees that can't be transplanted due to their large size. Sheets L-1 and L-2 were developed based on this study. They propose that 110 trees will be transplanted, stored and replanted after construction and 10 trees will be removed. These 10 will be replaced with 39 more. The sum of the caliper sizes of the new trees will equal the total of the caliper sizes of those removed. Any trees that die during the transplanting process will be replaced with the same species and be of the same size. B. Green Roof The green roof will be planted in what is commonly called the "extensive" method described and defined as utilizing a thin section of soil, or substrate containing a low level of organic matter to grow a mixture of drought -tolerant plants adding a relatively light weight load to the roof. This contrasts with the "intensive" method which utilizes a deep section of highly organic topsoil including even deeper containers to grow arden perennials, trees and shrubs. The intensive method creates heavy roof loading and requires irrigation as well as a high levels of maintenance. The extensive green roof as proposed requires no irrigation beyond natural rainfall and thrives with little maintenance. The green roof for the garage is designed as a public garden with easy access via two sets of elevators and stairways. A series of walks invite people to enjoy the space from a variety of I perspectives, get close to the plantings and link a series of terraces. One looks west over the treetops to highest UVM buildings (sunsets) , the others orient east across the airfield and offer stunning views of Mount Mansfield, Camels Hump and the Green Mountains. This planting on the roof of the Burlington International Airport will demonstrate the major principles of green roof design; stormwater conservation, amenity for people and reduction in both atmospheric heat buildup known as "urban heat island effect" and air pollution. 3. The parking garage lighting design presently utilizes maximum efficiency linear fluorescent fixtures with T-8 lamps (please see attached cut sheet). The fixtures acing will match the spacing of the existing HID 100 watt metal halide fixtures. The fixtures will be orientated perpendicular to the concrete tees. The fixtures will be mounted 6" above the bottom of the double tee. This will help shield the fixture to reduce glare. It is noted that alternates are being studied for utilizing LED fixtures in place of linear fluorescent fixtures in the parking_garage. This includes consideration of fixtures approved by Efficiency Vermont that meet IESNA LM-79 and 80 criteria. Completion of this study is expected in August 2009. The Green Roof lighting layout consists of wall mounted cut-off style LED fixtures at the egress stair towers as well as LED path fixtures (approx 18" in height) and LED bollard fixtures Mprox 36" in height). Please see attached fixture cut sheets. 4. The proposed solar panels and wind turbines will be connected to the public power system grid. These will be permitted by the Public Service Board under Section 248. 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 942 acres = 41,033,520Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing Unknown % / sq. ft. Proposed 0 % added (all expansion is vertical) / b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing Unknown % / sq. ft. Proposed 0% added / sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 29.3 % / sq. ft. Proposed 0 % added / sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 368,000 sq. ft.* (8.4 acres) sq. ft. * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $35,389,000 b) Landscaping: 665 000 (See attached `BIA Green Roof Garden Cost Estimate for a breakdown of landscaping costs) c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): Minor Utility Relocation costs are included in the overall building cost. Total project cost: $36,054,000 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): A Traffic Study has been completed for this project in accordance with the South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective January 5, 2009 and the VTrans Traffic Impact Study Guidelines. The traffic study is appended to this application. b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): See 10 a). c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): See 10 a). 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: See 10 a . 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: See 10 a . 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: September 30, 2014 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) A list of abutting property owners to the Burlington International Airport is attached. 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledg12 e. A F LICANT �r/y r po/'i'" ATCRF 61VI'96PPfKTY OWNER l�ri Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 0� REVIEW AUTHORIT : Development Review �Boarddministrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Incomp of Planning & Zoning or Designee lbate OWNER Mailing Address Address City State Zip 3000 WILLISTON RD LLC C/O FREDERIC LOWEA 1852 TEXAS HILL ROAD HINESBURG VT 05461 3065 WILLISTON RD LLC 3069 WILLISTON ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 3069 WILLISTON ROAD LLC 3069 WILLISTON ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 A & C REALTY LLC C/O OMEGA ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO 25 OMEGA DRIVE WILLISTON VT 05495 ADAMS DONALD L & D LOUISE 1265 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ADAMS PAUL G 1215 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ADAMS PAUL G 1215 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ADAMS PAUL G 1215 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ADAMS PAUL G 1215 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ADAMS RONALD C & RUTH A 1083 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 AIRPORT REALTY FBO AVCENTER 1130 AIRPORT DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ARRANTS STEPHEN P JR 137 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ASHTON THERESA & MICHAEL 1195 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ATLANTIC TELEMETRY INC PO BOX 1660 WILLISTON VT 05495 AUDETTE ROBERT J TRUSTEE AUDETTE ANNE W TRUSTEE 41 PETERSON TERRACE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 AUTOMASTERS MOTOR CO INC IROUTE7 SHELBURNE VT 05482 AVIATRON INC US 25 CUSTOMS DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 AYER PATRICK BRIAN MASLACK AYER TERESE PO BOX 9451 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05407 BACHAND ROBERT J & LORI E 68 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BARNIER SCOTT & BARBARA 20 JACKSON STREET ESSEX JUNCTION VT 05452 BARRY AGNES F C/O AGNES B THOMAS PO BOX 218 BAKERSFIELD VT 05441 BARRY BRUCE 1907 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BELTER JOHN H JR & JOYCE N 2 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BERGER RUSSELL G III 615 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BLOW MALCOM D & REBECCA J 449 WHITE ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BOARDMAN WILLIAM M & CYNTHIA D 42 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BOUFFARD MARGARET M, PATRICK C, JOSEPH N 65 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BRESNAHAN PHILLIP W III & KARE 1 21 BUTLER DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BRUECKNER ROBERT D & ROSEMARIE 451 WHITEST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BRUSOE ALAN L OSOUTEREANN M 11 MAYFAIR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 BURLINGTON CITY OF RTCO HERTZ ­CORP 225 BRAE BOULEVARD PARK RIDGE NJ 07656 BURT RUSSELL & KAREN L 141 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CALKINS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1835 SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CALKINS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1835 SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CAMERON PATRICIA A & WILLIAM T 1247 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CAMPION PAUL R 24 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CARTER RICHARD G 165 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CHASE THOMAS E 29 BERARD DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CHOINIERE PROPERTIES LLC 17 HARBOR WATCH ROAD BURLINGTON VT 05401 CHURCHILL ANN H 64 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CITY OF BURLINGTON 1200 AIRPORT DRIVE #1 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CITY OF BURLINGTON 1200 AIRPORT DRIVE #1 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 CLIFTON DAVID L & MARY W PO BOX 9476 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05407 CUNNINGHAM TRISTAN M BAILEY DONN 31 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DALEY KENNETH A & CAROLE 1227 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DALTON WILLIAM D 1383 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DEAVITT ALBERTA 1375 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 11 05403 DEEDS EDWARD A CONVERSE BAY ROAD CHARLOTTE VT 05407 DEFORGE GARY J 32 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DEGRECHIE PAUL R & MICHELLE M 199 KIRBY RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DEMERS DENNIS R 958 WEBSTER ROAD SHELBURNE VT 05482 DEROBERTIS MARC A 1185 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DESARNO DAVID C TRUST 4 LADD POINT ROAD GRAND ISLE VT 05458 DOERING ROBERT W & LORRIE M 1089 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DUHAMEL YVETTE 1 30 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 DUNKLEY THOMAS S & CHERYL 24 WHITE CHURCH LANE WESTFORD VT 05494 EMMONS ROGER A & ANNA M 1085 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ENTERTAINMENT UNLIMITED LLC 20 BISBEE ROAD VERGENNES VT 05491 FARGNOLI ASSOCIATES LLC 485 KIMBERLY DRIVE MELBOURNE FL 32940 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT 3630 HACKS CROSS ROAD, BUILDING C 3RD FLOOR MEMPHIS TN 38125-8800 FINNIGAN MICHAEL J & JOANNE J 34 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 FOLEY JOHN F & JOAN B 60 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 FONTAINE PAUL A & KIMBERLY A 133 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 FRANCO MICHAEL N & JUDITH M 120 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 GARVEY EDWARD W & PATRICIA G 44 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 GIRARD DANIEL E 11 HEATH STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAYES BRIAN G 22 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 HENNIGAR HOLDINGS LLC 805 EAST HILLSBORO BOULEVARD DEERFIELD BEACH FL 33441 HENRY MAUREEN C C/O THE MEDICAL STORE LTD 1225 AIRPORT PARKWAY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 HOBBS JAMES E & SHERRIE L 16 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 INVESTORS CORP OF VT 30 MAIN STREET, SUITE 401 BURLINGTON VT 05407 JACKSON SAMUAL 37 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 JAQUES BRIAN L & LISA A 137 BIRCH COURT BURLINGTON VT 05408 JOST INVESTEMNTS LLC 69 COLLEGE STREET BURLINGTON VT 05401 JTG HOLDINGS LLC II 272 WINDMILL BAY SHELBURNE VT 05482 KELESTURA DZEVAD & SAMIRA 13 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 KINVILLE PETER A & DONNA S 11 SOUTH HENRY CT SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 KRUGER REBECCA B, DOUGLAS B 1233 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 L N P INC 25 OMEGA DRIVE WILLISTON VT 05495 LACEYS INC 2000 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 LANDVATER DARRYL V OLIVER WIGHT CO 85 ALLEN MARTIN DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION VT 05407 LAPLANTE BERNARD J 1181 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 LEISURE WORLD INC 1245 AIRPORT PKWY SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 LEMAY JOSEPH H & BARBARA I 1379 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 LNP INC 300 CORNERSTONE DRIVE WILLISTON VT 05495 LNP INC 300 CORNERSTONE DRIVE WILLISTON VT 05495 LOSO HARRY J & DIANE M 53 MARYLAND ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 MAILLE GEORGE A JR & CHARLENE 38 LOGWOOD ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 MANAZIR THEODORE & CHRISTINA 129 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 MAXWELL KIM S 1261 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 METHOT DAVID F & RACHEL V 57 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 MOFFATT MARK A 1253 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 MOVABLE PEAKS 14 BERARD DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 MUNSON EARTH MOVING CORP C/O SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY CO PO BOX 2204 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05407 MUNSON RANDALL G C/O SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY CO PO BOX 2204 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05407 O'BRIEN DANIEL J & LEO J JR C/O R. L. VALLEE INC 280 SOUTH MAIN STREET ST. ALBANS VT 05478 O'BRIEN DANIEL J & LEO J JR PO BOX 2184 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05407 OLTEANU FLORIN & SVETLANA 11 ELIZABETH ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 PALMER ALAN D & CHRISTINE L 5576 DORSET STREET SHELBURNE VT 05482 PALMER ALAN D & CHRISTINE L 5576 DORSET STREET SHELBURNE VT 05482 PICKERING RODNEY A 184 KIRBY RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 PIERCE SANDRA M 72 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 PLOOF DAVID W JR 77 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 PMP REALTY LLC PO BOX 600 GARDINER ME 04345 PROULX GERARD E & SUSAN F 1155 AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 RDT AVIATION, INC C/O TOM WEAVER 25 PINECREST DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION VT 05452 ROBAR PAUL L JR & WANDA I PO BOX 5190 BURLINGTON VT 05401-5190 ROBENSTEIN ROBERT J 2 LEDOUX TERR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ROBERT SCOTT LLC PO BOX 615 MANCHESTER ME 04351 ROCHFORD CHRISTOPHER & REBECCA S 47 MARYLAND ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ROONEY WALDEN J & DARLA A 5 MOUNTAIN VIEW BLVD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 RUSSELL JOHN A & LYNN A 1161 WILLISTON ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 S M S REALTY PARTNERSHIP 4016 WILLISTON RD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 SCRIGGINS GENEVA B 420 WHITE ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 SEAFOX INC 443 GOVERNORS LANE SHELBURNE VT 05482 SHAND ROBERT M 5 ETHAN ALLEN DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 SHAND ROBERT M & LYNDA A 5 ETHAN ALLEN DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 SHELBURNE SHIPYARD I PO BOX 610 SHELBURNE VT 05482 SHELBURNE SHIPYARD I PO BOX 610 SHELBURNE VT 05482 SHEPARD GARY F & BETTY JOAN 1 PATRICK ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 SHIP SEVIN LLC C/O KEVIN SPILLANE 334 TAMARACK SHORES SHELBURNE VT 05482 SPRANO ROBERTA M 1 392 WHITE ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 ST JOHN VIANNEY HOME ASSN I C/O KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS I PO BOX 9214 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05407 SUBURBAN VT PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS LLC 240 ROUTE 10 WEST WHIPPANY NJ 07981 SWEET LEIGH M & ELLEN F 148 COUNTRY CLUB DR EAST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 SZWAJA MARIAN & SOPHIE TRUST 1 BUTLER DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 TATRO SAM E SR & ALBERTA M 38 DUMONT AVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 THIBAULT LEONARD E THIBAULT DOROTHY F 1184 REYNOLDS ROAD ST ALBANS VT 05478 TILLEY FRANCES R 114l AIRPORT DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 TIMBERLAKE ASSOCIATES WALTER E SIMENDINGER 32 SAN REMO DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 TODISCO ANTONIO & ANNA TRUSTEE 71 LAKEWOOD PARKWAY BURLINGTON VT 05401 TOULIS CHRISUSTOMOS A & CHRISTINE S 11 MEADOW LANE UNDERHILL VT 05489 TRI-D III LLC 15 TIGAN STREET WINOOSKI VT 05404 WETHERBEE WILLIAM F & MICHAEL W 467 DEPOT ROAD COLCHESTER VT 05446 WILLARD MALCOLM 699 NOB HILL ROAD WILLISTON VT 05495 WILLARD MALCOLM 699 NOB HILL ROAD WILLISTON VT 95 WOOD WARREN W & EVELYN R 35 CRESCENT BEACH DRIVE BURLINGTON VT �05407 WRIGHT WILLIAM G & LORETTA M 11DUMONTAVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 03 BIA Green Roof Garden Cost Estimate July 8, 2009 Mike Lawrence ASLA North South Item Qty Qty Quantity Unit $$/unit Total F Greenscreen fence 2,424 3,054 5,478 sf $ 28.97 $ 158,698 Garden Ornament 2 2 4 each $ 1,158.79 $ 4,635 Litter Receptacle 1 1 2 each $ 869.10 $ 1,738 Garden Bench - 6' 7 8 15 each $ 1,533.13 $ 22,997 Poly Planters 51 61 112 each $ 75.00 $ 8,400 Drain Board & Filter Fabric 12,851 10,968 23,819 sf $ 1.16 $ 27,630 L 4" Planting Modules 8,435 6,497 14,932 sf $ 13.91 $ 207,704 6" Planting Modules 181 233 414 sf $ 17.38 $ 7,196 8"x18" Curb @ Greenscreen 404 509 913 If $ 17.38 $ 15,870 Blue Stone Paver Walks 3,721 3,628 7,349 sqft $ 23.18 $ 170,350 Belgian Block Edging @ Modules 64 64 128 If $ 8.69 $ 1,112 Garden pathway lighting 37 44 81 each $ 477.25 $ 38,657 Subtotal $ 664,988 say: $ 665,000 c. Enerov Source For Intelligent Energy Management Specially designed to provide maximum efficiency lighting for garage environments, the VT high -intensity fluorescent (VT-HIF) luminaire features a heavy grade industrial fixture enclosed inside a fully gasketed, high quality fiberglass body. The VT series is designed to "push" light across and along the luminaire to maximize light output in between the luminaires where it is typically most needed. The VT is suitable for exterior, wet location and damp environments. The VT-HIF luminaire is custom engineered to replace HID fixtures (70-watt to 175-watt) with four foot, two and three lamp T8 configurations from 76-watts to 126-watts. (No four lamp luminaires are needed. Any additional light will come from a higher power ballast). If necessary, eight foot, two, three and four lamp configurations can also be used. This efficient, enclosed luminaire is available in 4' and 8' nominal lengths. • Available in two or three lamp and asymmetric profiles with a wide variety of photometry. • Standard shatter -resistant high -impact 50% DR acrylic lens fits snugly to provide a water tight seal between lens and gasket. • Standard zero -degree electronic ballasts with variety of ballast factor configurations. • Wet location die cast zinc hub provides point of entry for connection. • Optional mounting bracket available. Paint after fabrication available. Carries UL and CUL wet location listings. HOUSING: Gasketed, fiberglass enclosure is dust and moisture resistant. Standard shatter resistant 50% DR acrylic lens is held in place by latches that ensure a continuous seal. CHANNEL: Formed from cold rolled, pre -painted steel. Five stage iron -phosphate pretreatment ensures superior paint adhesion and rust resistance. Painted parts finished with high -gloss, baked white enamel. REFLECTOR: Material is Miro® enhanced specular aluminum with a total reflectivity of 95%. MOUNTING: The VT series fixture is suitable for surface or pendant mounting. LAMPHOLDERS: T8 lamps are secured with locking lampholders. I�0 N 2-LAMP NORMAL Fixture Efficiency:80.2% SC Across: 1.4, SC Along:1.3 Consult your IntellEnergy sales representative for additional fixture and system options, accessories, lighting analysis and lighting design support. 3 -LAMP BROAD Fixture Efficiency:67.9% SC Across:1.9, SC Along.1.3 1,1111E0 09/03 CS IQM LIGHTING Type: Job: Catalog number: W F22 / Fixture Electrical Module Finish I See page 2 Specifications I--- 85/a" 101/2" (Y19 1 mm) (266 7 min) o p J-box in wall by others. Cutoff Face Surface Mount Light distribution Cutoff Face Options See page 3 NUBBELL I;L'�`dtl HN66ELL LIGHTING INC U.S. PATENTS: D385,054, D381,452, D378,621 Wall Forms'WF22 Cutoff Face Surface Mount, Round revision 10/1 /08 • wf22.pdf Approvals: Date: Page: 1 of 3 Surface Mount: Die-cast, low copper (<0.6% Cu) aluminum alloy with double side walls. Zinc plated steel mounting plate supplied for mounting to standard 3" or 4" junction box. Face Plate: Die-cast, low copper (<0.6% Cu) aluminum alloy with vertical and horizontal double ribs covering the full hemisphere. Ribs are minimum 5/8" depth and '/16' thickness. Secures to housing with four stainless steel captive socket head screws. Cutoff Face: Solid upper half and solid lower half with vertical light baffles. Lens: Flat tempered glass, 3/16" minimum thickness with internal sandblast. Retained in face plate and sealed with a one-piece silicone gasket. Socket: (HID): Porcelain medium base socket rated 4KV. (Fluorescent): Plastic GX24q-3/GX24q-4 base socket. No socket for LED. Ballast: All components mounted on housing. (HID): Reactor - High power factor with starting temperatures of -40°F. for HPS and -20°F. for PMH lamp modes. For PMH/120 volt, a step-up transformer is provided. For HPS%277 volt, a step-down transformer is provided. For PMH and HPS/347 volt, a step-down transformer is provided. (Fluorescent): Encapsulated with thermal cutoff. Electronic with multi -voltage (108V to 305V) input, 50/60 HZ, High power factor with starting temperatures of -0°F. LED Optical System: A total of 9 LED emitters configured in a rectangular array comprised together as a module. Two (2) modules for 30W version. Available in "Halogen White" (approx. 3500K). Emitters are directly attached to the electronic driver. LED Driver: 1 or 2 constant current electronic driver(s). Rated for 15 watts each: 15W=9001m, 30W=18001m. Available in 120V or 277V input. -40°F. starting temperature. All drivers are Underwriters Laboratories recognized. Finish: Super TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness, applied over a titanated zirconium conversion coating; 2500 hour salt spray test endurance rating. Standard colors are Black, Dark Bronze, Light Gray, Stealth Gray ', Platinum Silver, or White. Custom colors are available. Finishing Items: Electrical modules and face plates. Each set of finishing items shall be in one container, clearly marked with the fixture catalog number. CAUTION: Fixtures must be grounded in accordance with national, state, and/or local electrical codes. Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. Listings and Ratings UL CUL 1598' IP66 Rated I CE 25C Ambient 'Suitable for wet locations KIM LIGHTING RESFRVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT NOTICE © 2008 KIM LIGHTING INC. • P.O BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL, 626/968-5666 • FAX. 626/369-2695 5608208275 IQM LIGHTING Wall Forms'WFZZ Cutoff Face Surface Mount, Round revision 10/1/08 • wf22.pdf Type: Job: Page: 2 of 3 Standard Features Fixture Cat. No. WF22 Electrical Module HIPS = High Pressure Sodium PMH = Pulse Start Metal Halide PL = Compact Fluorescent LED = Light Emitting Diodes Lamp Lamp Line Watts Type Volts 70 PMH 277 Finish Super TGIC powder coat paint over a titanated zirconium conversion coating. Cat. Nos. for Electrical Modules available: High Pressure Sodium Pulse Start Metal Halide 150HPS120 L_ 170HPS120 1_; 50PMH120 1170PMH120 J 50HPS277 J 70HPS277 IJ 50PMH277 JI 70PMH277 J 50HPS347 11 70HPS347 J 50PMH347 ] 70PMH347 Lamp ED-17, Clear ED-17, Clear ED_l 7, Clear--- _ ED-17, Clear Medium Base' Socket Medium Base' Medium Base' Medium Base' ANSI Ballast S68 S62 M110 M98 Type Compact Fluorescent LED 11 42PL' ❑ 15LED120 ❑ 30LED120 115LED277 17 30LED277 Lamp Compact Fluor. LED LED Socket GX24q-4 Base N/A N/A 'All surface mount fixtures use reactor ballasts. '42PL operates 26, 32, and 42 watt lamps at 120 thru 277 volts (.50-60 Hz.) Color: Black Dark Bronze Light Gray Stealth Gray ' Platinum Silver White Custom Colors' Cat. No.: J BL J DB ❑ LG J SG J PS ❑ WH ❑ CC 'Custom colors subject to additional charges, minimum quantities and extended lead times. Consult representative. Custom color description: © 2008 KIM LIGHTING INC. • PO. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL. 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5608208275 wM LIGHTING Wall Forms'WF22 Cutoff Face Surface Mount, Round revision 10/1 /08 • wf22.pdf Type: Job: Page: 3 of 3 Optional Features Fusing Single Fusing for 120V, 277V, and 347V primary. Cat. No. ' I SF No Option Emergency Battery Back-up Cat. No. F EM C No Option Internal battery pack provides 90 minutes of supplemental light at 750 lamp lumens on 42 watt compact fluorescent lamps only. Im Battery Back-up © 2008 KIM LIGHTING INC. - PO BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0060 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX 626/369-2695 5608208275 Beta Catalog Number: BLD - PWY- T2 - - 014 - LED-B - Notes: A" -100•'- [254 mml 7 0" [177 m Model Dimension "A" Landscape-12 13" Landscape-18 1R" Pathway 36" a 4 0" [102 min] - pedestrian 96" - - -- - -- ---- ---- Product llmoinq Initial Delivered LFD Color Faclotj-histalledOptions Fatuity Indicator Optics Alountirt„ Lumens (00's) I'e rformance Ndttkge Options It L110-Ing more than one option, please type BP02 014 LED-B ©UL ©SV Dmm:mually on the tines piovtded abuse LD PWV T21 ® r ruse ©PI' (120-277V ©13K OHI,-Hi/Low (175/350/525, dual circuit inpn)7-9 ©P34 Universal) ©WH © pg5 OUH [3BZ TL 2-Level (l75/5_5 w/ integrated sensor control) © (347-480V ©PB E3TL2- 2-Level (01350 w/ integrated sensor control)7 9 Unfveisal)6 ©TL3 2-Level (0/525 w/ integrated sensor contlol)7•9 ©12 ©27 ©346 Footnotes' I-IESNA Type II cbst,,bulton 5-8' mound mount pole lot pedestrian lixime 8-Senior not included 2-6" ground pole mount for 13" landscape fixture (,-Av.u[xble roi P3 and P8 mnunl only 9-Refer to multi level Spec sheet for moie infunuauon 3-11" ground pole mount for 18" landscape fixture 7-Avmlable ]or PI, Pc and P8 mounl only 4-3' gtomid uunurt pole Cor pathway fixture (bollard) Output Multipliers Color Lumen Temperature Multiplier 6000K (Standard) 1.00 4300K 0,80 0.75 _3500K — - Ambient Lumen Temperature (°C) Multiplier - -20 - - 1 11 10 1 04 25 1 00 40 0 96 Drive - Lumen Power 1170 Life* Current Multiplier Multiplier I (hours) 1� 55AA 0 6_ 0.5 i > 150,000 350mA (Standard) - 1 0 _ L0 > 150,000 - 525mA- 1 3 1.5 82,000 * Based on fissure operating at I5" L' � Refer to LED Ambient spec sheet LED Performance Generation B Specs* i System System Initial Delivered Lumens- Watts Watts # of LEDs Type 11 Optic 120-277V 347-480V 18 1,290 (014) - 25 27 - - * Based on 6000k color temperature li.rture operafing at 350mA and 25C Ambfcnt Beta LED 1200 92nd Street Sturtevant, WI 53177 800-236-6800 www.BetaLED.cont L; LED I Getseral Description Durable die-cast aluminum fixture housing mounts directly to 4" diameter pole without visible mounting hardware for clean appearance. Pole mounts to rugged die cast aluminum internal flange secured to grade by (3) 3/8-16 anchor bolls (provided). Note: T45 Torx 3/8 socket required for head installation. Top mounted LEDs for superior optical pet formance and light contiol. 5 yeai limited warranty on fixture. Electrical Fixture lit by 18W high brightness, cool white, 6000K ( i- 500k per full fixture), minimum 75 CRI, long life LED sources. 120-277V 50/60Hz, Class 1 LED drivers are standard. 347-480V 50/60 Hz driver is optional. LED drivers have power factor>90% at full load. Units provided with integral 9kV surge suppression protection standard. Fic,141-lii.vtalied ,l cecssories o Retro-Fit Kit Photo pxA-x»rsR Available Used for replacement of -- - existing bollards Vertical Horizontal 90 -I Independent Testing Laboratories certified test. Report No. ITL61798. Candlepower distribution curve of 18 LED Type 11 pathway bollard with 1,290 initial delivered lumens. t inish Exclusive Colorfast DeltaGuard" finish features an E-Coat epoxy primer with an ultra -durable silver powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. Bronze, black, white and platinum bronze powder topcoats are also available. The finish is covered by our 10 year lnuited warranty patents Pending 15' 10, 5' 0' 5' 10, 10' 5' 0' 5' Isofootcandle plot of Type 11 15' pathway bollard, 18 LED 30 bar product at 3' A.F.G. Luminaire with 1,290 initial 1 5 delivered lumens operating at 350ntA. Initial FC at Om grade. 15 10' ' 30 46 30 15 Om 15 30 46 L p -_ LED Beta LED 1200 92nd Street Sturtevant, W1 53177 800-236-6800 www.BetaLED.com r�'ti� - � �' � i ,k Syr ,.i ^ a�•f � � �;' x� 1 i �j t , � �"�y `\fir � A •', � � �J" �T �� t, � - , T. ,`� "� „ • + , wY� ,� ' '� to , �,' k� i� �. 1• , .x I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlington airport\garage expansion.doc Burlington International Airport, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking approval to construct two (2) additional parking levels to an existing two (2) level parking garage to accommodate 1370 vehicles, 1200 Airport Drive. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Raymond Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans and have the following comments: ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS The expansion to the garage is predominantly vertical: the addition will result in additional 75 square feet of footprint. Given the hundreds of acres on the site, the 75 square feet will not affect even a fraction of a percentage of impervious coverage. As such, the property's adherence to the dimensional requirements of the district will not change. The proposed changes in height are addressed below in this report. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The purpose of the additional parking levels is to meet what the applicant states is an established need for more on -site parking by providing an additional 1370 parking spaces. Staff recommends that the applicant provide a parking needs assessment. The applicant should also provide information as to what is being done to reduce the need for parking. 1. The applicant should provide a parking needs assessment which addresses the current and future need for parking. The applicant shall also discuss what is being done to reduce the need for parking on site. Access to the garage and circulation in the vicinity will remain unchanged: vehicles will access the airport property at the southern drive. Access to the garage remains just north of the main terminal. Garage exits, access for rental cars, and general exit from the airport remain unchanged. The layout of the proposed project continues provides for safe pedestrian movement. There is an existing sidewalk through the access drives which is substantially signed for pedestrian safety. There is also an enclosed bridge which connects the parking structure to the terminal. Pedestrian access to the garage is also provided in two points from the recreation path along Airport Drive. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlinaton airoort\aaraae expansion.doc There is at least one crosswalk across Airport Drive to connect the two sides of the road. However, they appear to be out of place. The applicant should revise their plan to examine the adequacy of number and location of these crosswalks. 2. The plans shall be revised to include details for appropriate pedestrian connections across Airport Drive. This should at least include adequate striping, but perhaps also additional signage, lit and unlit. The applicant should work with the Director of Public Works on this matter. The applicant should also address the circulation and traffic pattern within the garage. The existing circulation is not ideal and there are some concerns that an addition would only exacerbate this problem. 3. The applicant shall address the circulation and traffic flow pattern within the structure. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The general location of the parking remains unchanged. The existing parking structure was sited several years ago. It would be impractical to locate an additional structure in a different location than where one already exists. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The existing structure is 36'8" in height. The roof of the top level of the addition will reach 57'6". The top of the coping at the stairwells will reach 69'6". The top of the stair tower with the cellular antenna will reach 77'. The applicant is also proposing small wind turbines (11'6" high) atop the proposed garage which would reach a maximum height of 88'6" above ground level. The applicant has stated that the wind turbines will be connected to the grid. As such they are exempt from local review. Therefore, the applicant is seeking a maximum height of 77 feet. As the maximum height for a flat roofed building is 35 feet, this would require a height waiver of 42 feet. 4. The Board grants a height waiver of 42 feet, for a height of 77'0" for the top of the antenna and a height waiver of 346" for a height of 696" for the top of stair towers and a height waiver of 226" for a height of 576" the roof of the top deck. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. 4. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. Staff believes that this requirement is being met through the proposed project. The applicant is proposing to continue the materials and architectural style (arched facade with columns along the parking decks). CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlinaton airport\garage expansion.doc (t) Proposed structures shall be ►ekWed harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. Staff feels the proposed structure relates harmoniously to the existing garage. Furthermore, the applicant is proposing a roof on the top level of the parking garage with 11.3% of the area being green area available for seasonal public access. The remaining 88.7% of the roof is proposed to be used for photovoltaic panels to generate power. Site elan armlications shall meet the followina specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to create any additional access points to the properties that abut the subject property. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). There are no additional trash facilities proposed as a result of the proposed project. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements Pursuant to Table 13-9 of the Land Development Regulations, the minimum landscaping requirement for the proposed expansion is $361,390. The applicant is proposing a green roof on a portion of the top level of the structure. The itemized totals for this roof total $664,988. Staff has been working with the applicant to determine which of the items included in this budget shall be counted towards the landscaping minimum. There are certainly some components that achieve the goals specified in the SBLDR towards screening, aesthetic, and environmental values of landscaping. It is also unclear which, if any, of the proposed items are actual plants. As the landscape architect was unavailable at the time of this report due to vacation, staff will continue to work towards this goal. Staff is reasonably confident that it can be met. 5. The applicant shall work with the Staff and the City Arborist to ensure that the plan meets the minimum landscaping requirement. The applicant is also proposing to remove and transplant or replace some existing trees which will be impacted as a result of the construction. The City Arborist has reviewed the plans and CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlington airport\garage expansion doc has stated that he has no comments on this portion of the plan. 6. The City Arborist shall review the plans and provide comments. If necessary, the plans should be revised accordingly. Lighting The lighting proposed by the applicant is adequate with respect to allowable lighting fixtures. The proposed fixtures are in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations, and are full cut-off fixtures; The applicant has submitted a point by point plan for the lighting on the roof as well as photo simulations which depict the proposed building after dark. It is still not clear however to what extent the new addition and additional lighting fixtures will result in lighting levels spilling over the airport property lines. The applicant should address this at the hearing. A lighting point by point plan should be submitted which reaches the property line and depicts any lighting which extends beyond it. If necessary, staff advises a technical review of the proposed lighting. 7. The applicant shall submit a complete lighting point by point plan prior to site plan approval. They shall address any occurrences of lighting spillover onto adjacent streets or properties. The "hot spot" of lighting bulbs shall not be visible. Traffic The applicant has submitted a detailed traffic study. Staff strongly advises a technical review of this traffic study by a third party traffic consultant. 8. The plans shall be reviewed by a third party traffic consultant. Where necessary, the applicant shall address and implement suggested changes. Other The City Engineer is reviewing the plans but has not yet provided written comments. The City Engineer should have comments prior to completion of the other necessary items already specified in this report. 9. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Engineer. Where necessary, plans shall be revised. Bicycle racks and similar facilities for pedestrian or alternative travel should be addressed through the parking needs assessment. The applicant has not addressed how snow will be removed from the garage or if it will be stored on site. 10. The applicant shall address snow removal and storage. The South Burlington Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and has voiced concerns about adequacy of communication within the structure (see attached letter dated August 5, 2009). This should be addressed prior to approval so as not to further exacerbate an already dangerous issue. I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlington airport\garage expansion.doc 11. The applicant shall work with the South Burlington Fire Department to ensure adequate and safe communication throughout the structure. A plan shall be approved by the Chief prior to site plan approval. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board continue Site Plan application #SP-09-63 subject to questions regarding the landscaping of the green roof and a technical review of traffic, and conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document. ly submitted, South Burlington Fire Depariment 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4110 Douglas S. Brent, Fire Chief August 5, 2009 Mr. Ray Belair, City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Airport Parking Lot Expansion Dear Ray: I have reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of the additional levels to the parking structure at Burlington International Airport. 1. Compliance with all requirements of the Vermont Division of Fire Safety codes and standards. 2. Upgrade of any fire protection systems such as sprinklers, standpipes, or fire alarms as required by Vermont Division of Fire Safety. 3. If any additional Fire Department Connections are added the location is to be specified by SBFD. 4. If any additional fire alarm panels or enunciators are added the location is to be specified by SBFD. 5. The Fire Chief should be contacted when nearing project completion for familiarization, safety, and cautionary training for emergency response personnel regarding a solar electricity project of this magnitude. 6. Provisions should be included in this project for upgrade of the South Burlington Fire Department emergency response communication system. As the airport campus has been expanded upon, our fire and emergency medical services radio communications capabilities have been compromised. Radio signal strength and broadcast ability is directly affected by mass such as the continued addition of brick, concrete, concrete block and steel. Radio signal coverage within the structures at the airport is spotty or absent in numerous areas. In discussions with our communications vendor the addition of a device called a "bi-directional amplifier" would correct this problem. This device is a type of radio signal repeater. 7. During construction keep all emergency access points open and do not block fire lanes or hydrants. Page - 2 At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves forward additional items may surface which could be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the property owner representatives and the Division of Fire Safety. Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact me. ,]Sin erely, Douglas S. Brent Fire Chief DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 7 JULY 2009 PAGE 2 subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4: Site Plan Application #SP-09-52 of City of Burlington/Burlington International ,Airport to amend a previously approved plan for a 297,000 sq. ft. three -level parking garage addition of 2,075 spaces. The amendment consists of revising the landscaping plan, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Lawrence said the plans were approved earlier but the Airport didn't pick up the zoning permit in a timely manner. Mr. Belair said there are no changes to the approved plan. Mr. Gamelin asked if this is a new addition or just related to the existing building. Mr. Lawrence said it is related to the existing building and is approving required landscaping. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-09-52 of City of Burlington/ Burlington International Airport subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-27 of Bullrock Corp. to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of five multi -family dwellings for a total of 160 units and a 40-unit congregate housing facility. The amendment consists of constructing a 100-unit congregate housing facility, 250 Quarry Hill Road: Mr. Knudsen stepped down during this application due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Thomas showed the road that is to be constructed. The building will house 100 residents, 80 of whom need help with everyday living. The other 20 have memory impairment. Amenities will include medical, dining, religious, 24-hour shuttle, etc. Residents will not be permitted to have their own vehicles. This will be a Level 3 Rehab - residential care facility, the most intense care before a nursing home. The site is hilly, and the building will be tucked into the site. Only 2 stories will be above grade near the parking area. The cul de sac on East Terrace will be used for emergency access. It will be a paved, one -lane road with "do not enter, for emergency use only" signs on both sides. It will be plowed by the City. Mr. Belair noted it would also serve as a bike path. Mr. Beldock explained the levels of care in the facility and estimated 5-7 ambulance visits a month. A member of the audience asked about traffic on Rt. 2 heading east. Mr. Dinklage said there is a Spear St. corridor study, and this development has been approved for a certain number of trip ends. There are guidelines as to when improvements are warranted. Mr. l /2—M 'IbA CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: i 1 004? N)116� MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST e2NyM ' Savr-� recz,�� S"¢o3 f-?-.vA� a A- �,z coop -7-76 Q P.-k oc/ - y 9 Cnos�S Z,151-7 R.Or 2y,5 ' oOLJ(q I'A$-IK- b t4 vf-' Sb - D °i - T 1 all, - 0,5:q8z. Ao-r '*'3 p 0 L 9 boor ic.r�sl t," l V —cl AME"I,j5 3 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEA l G DATE�WF C� �� NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST �n G tc -re— r * M S ,— D 4 1 �f•- V \ �� 1%b� L. Cckv.i ��1`t ��-r►-r S• ��-�t�4i-� �i SIB --D � �- 2.-7 JtJA qA -� t c-5� East �� T� cam. ��-v9-a7 u wok; ft(� no�'u s� TeA Ste, ©� - Zq CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: -7" 7. 0 / bT' N-(O'KT 11U MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST b o J60 li roc Q� ��cG Oka)-, CPVA-rr� +�PC��'1"j- • i3o;c cGG i 8 G Sv t.( �Ll�o ve + tic: ow+z S, ��✓ � • v���yo � S ., oS., b�� GptMS�o�- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative, obligations with --respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity -for each person wishing to achieve -interested -person - statusto-demonstrate:-eorn{pttarrce-w4th the,applicable-cdteria.:24 V:S:A: §-44131(b). The- DRB must -keep- a: written. record-of-the•na-mer address- arid --partici-pation of -each -person = ' - who-.has_sought interested --person ttatus 24-V.S.A,---g-4461(-b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DR-B=must-be mailed -to -every person -or body appearing- and having been heard byth-e=DRB_ 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of:notice of an appeal to the environmental, court, the DRB-must-supply a list of interested -persons to the appellant•in five. working days;-24-V.S.X §-4471(c). HEARING DATE: �37\.Au��p`i NNOT MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST Al- 1 r r W� southburlington PLANNING & ZONING July 9, 2009 Robert McEwling Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 1200 Airport Drive SP-09-52 Reapproval Dear Mr. Dawson: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Development Review Board on July 7, 2009 (effective 7/7/09). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, 04;0- ke4� Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 6765 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Site Plan Application Permit Number SP- - VNI, APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board, 1. OWNER OFRX=COFZP (Name 2s shown on deecL malli g a r ss, ph -one and fax '�d 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page 3. APPLICAN(Name, mailing Address, phone and fax #): 4, CONTACT PERSON (person ill receive 11 CQ[resDonden=� �ff�n I adcVe!ks, phone & fax -.1 a. Contact e-mail address: A 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 12V 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): �-=-'�r7r� r"­> 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. Gen project des On ton (explain what y u want approval for): 1 b, Existing Uses on Property (i Site Plan Application uding description and size of each separate use): c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): d. Total building squ re fo tage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings : ZA I I remain)6 Atz -,, e, Height of building & number of floors (proposed b-uildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): XJ M� f. Number of residential, applicable, new units and existing units to remain): g. Number of employees & comp, office employees): _ IIA � y vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non- h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable)* 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing % t sq. ft. Proposed % l sq. ft. e' b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % 1 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % l sq, ft, Proposed -% sq. ft. 2 Site Plan Application d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft,) Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9, COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): S b. Landscaping: $ c, Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10, ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): / zc b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out)-, c. P.M, Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12, PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: i ? /o _1 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: / �/ 14, ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 3 I 15, SITE PLAN AND FEE Site Plan Application A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached, Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11 " x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF PROP SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT Do not write below this line PRINT NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: t/Develop ment Review' Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: I /-Complete,, Incomplete Planning & Zoning or Designee .1 611,9-14 Date southhurl i i o n PLANNING & ZONING June 29, 2009 City of Burlington/ Burlington International Airport Attn: Robert McEwing 1200 Airport Drive #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Reapproval of SP-07-87 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is the draft agenda for the July 7, 2009 South Burlington Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com .1� southhu. di gvto PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planne& RE: Agenda #4, Site Plan Application #SD-09-52 DATE: June 29, 2009 Site plan application #SD-09-52 of City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport for re -approval to amend a previously approved plan for a 297,000 sq. ft. three (3) level parking garage addition for 2,075 spaces. The amendment consists of revising the landscaping plan, 1200 Airport Drive. The site plan was originally approved at a public hearing on January 8, 2008. However, the applicant never obtained a zoning permit within the six month deadline, pursuant to Section 17.04 of the SBLDR and conditional item number 4 of the original approval. Staff also notes that the applicant has been using and occupying the parking garage addition for a number of years without a Certificate of Occupancy in violation of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. A Certificate of Occupancy can not be issued because the applicant failed to comply with the approved landscaping plan. This application is an attempt to correct the landscaping plan so that a Certificate of Occupancy can be issued. The applicant received site plan approval in February 2003 (SP-02-59) to construct the parking garage. At that time, the landscaping requirement based on construction costs was $101,565. The applicant proposed a total `landscaping' budget of $131,895. This value consisted of new plantings, but also significantly of a new irrigation system, cedar fencing, granite edging, and transplanted shrubs and trees. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www sburl.com The applicant then submitted new plans which indicated that the entire $131, 895 was not planted or installed. Rather, the value of the installed landscape and related material was $110,025. The value of the trees and shrubs proposed and approved in 2003 was for $58,350. The applicant then proposed only $53,275 in trees and shrubs, requesting credit for compost for flower beds and an expanded irrigation system. The Board previously required that the plans and landscaping budget be revised to reflect an additional $5,075 in new trees or shrubs for a minimum total of $58,350 in trees and shrubs. The plans have since been revised to demonstrate this. The City Arborist has reviewed the plans and issued comments in a memo dated December 5, 2007. His comments have been addressed. No reduced copy of the revised plan is available and large plans will be made available at the hearing. Staff recommends the Board approve Site Plan # SP-09-52. y Michael Lawrence Associates Londsc,-ihe Architects / Site (binning Consultants March 27, 2008 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 1200 AIRPORT DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT LANDSCAPING AMENDMENT FOR CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON FINAL APPROVAL 297,000 SQ. FT. THREE (3) LEVEL PARKING GARAGE ADDITION COST ESTIMATE FOR LANDSCAPING ALONG WHITE & DUMONT STREETS Key Quan Scientific Name Common Name Size Unit cost Semi -Total Abco 6 Abies concolor Concolor Fir 6-7' $250 $1,500 Piab 1 Picea abies Norway Spruce 5-6' $200 $ 200 Picgl-A 4 Picea glauca White Spruce 5-6' $200 $ 800 Picgl-B 4 Picea glauca White Spruce 6-7' $250 $1,000 Picom 10 Picea omorika Serbian Spruce 5-6' $200 $22,000 TOTAL $5,500 -tEMBER Amencan Society of L+ndscape Architects E:gfit Linden Line Ess(2x AMU IC) II, VerfilOnt 0!j451 F'/F 802 878 2118 m kef,tvvrercec+)rrdelpiu r net Cathyann LaRose From: Robert McEwing [rmcewing@btv aero] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 3.45 PM To: Cathyann LaRose Cc: MikeLawrence@adelphia.net; Heather Kendrew, Juli Beth Hoover, ray Subject: DRB item Cathy: I understand that I was negligent by not picking up a "placard" to post somewhere on the airport advising that we were on the DRB agenda tonight to discuss the revised landscaping plan for the parking garage expansion. Therefore, I would like to plead for companion and ask that we be removed from our #16 spot on tonight's agenda and moved to a later meeting, maybe in early January. If that pleading is granted, and if we promise to be good during the holiday season, do you suppose there might be some hope that we could rise higher up the agenda ladder at that later meeting? Thank you and have a good holiday. Robert McEwing Director, Planing & Development Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive #1 So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-863-2874 802-863-7947 (fax) 1 City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 southbul'," - .1-o-lon. V E H MON r February 6, 2008 Bob McEwing Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Minutes — Garage Landscaping Dear Mr. McEwing: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved January 8, 2008 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. (802)846-4106 — phone (802)846-4106 — fax planning @sburl.com S I e6- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MINUTES JANUARY 8, 2008 Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Consent Agenda subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. `Continued Site Plan #SP-07-87 of the City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport to amend a previously approved plan for a three level parking garage addition for 2,075 parking spaces. The amendment consists of revising the landscaping plan, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Belair said the application is to bring the landscaping up to the original amount. No issues were raised. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan SP-07-87 of the City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site Plan Application 4SP-07-97 of Paul Adams to amend a previously approved plan for a 19,850 sq. ft. light manufacturing building. The amendment consists of increasing lot coverage by 20.1%, 1215 Airport Parkway: Ms. Adams said they are increasing the percentage of impervious surface. The lot will still be within the regulations. Ms. Adams asked that they not have to screen the dumpster because it is easier not to have to do it. Members felt this should be required. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-07-97 of Paul Adams subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Site Plan Application #SP-07-108 of Lowe's Home Centers to amend a previously approved plan for a 120,450 sq. ft. retail building (shopping center use). The amendment consists of: 1) reducing parking by 24 spaces, and 2) adding outside storage/display in the eliminated parking space area, 189 Hannaford Drive: Mr. Dinklage stressed that parking spaces and outdoor storage are big items to the DRB and asked that Mr. White convey that message to the owners. Mr. White noted that parking requirements for this site were changed in October, 2006. the majority of the reduction they are asking for is a result of this change. IBM CITz OF SOUTH BURLINGT N DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 3, 2008 Heather Kendrew Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Site Plan #SP-07-87 Dear Ms. Kendrew: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely,, P .6TD�L Betsy Lonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planne (e, ' RE: Agenda #4, Site Plan Application #SD-07-87 DATE: January 2, 2008 Site plan application #SD-07-71 of City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport to amend a previously approved plan for a 297,000 sq. ft. three (3) level parking garage addition for 2,075 spaces. The amendment consists of revising the landscaping plan, 1200 Airport Drive. The application was originally scheduled for a hearing on December 11, 2007 and continued because the applicant never picked up the placard to display on the property as required by state statute and so that proper notice of the hearing is allowed for all interested parties. The applicant subsequently obtained the placard and displayed it to the satisfaction of Staff and state statute. Staff also notes that the applicant has been using and occupying the parking garage addition for a number of years without a Certificate of Occupancy in violation of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. A Certificate of Occupancy can not be issued because the applicant failed to comply with the approved landscaping plan. This application is an attempt to correct the landscaping plan so that a Certificate of Occupancy can be issued. The applicant received site plan approval in February 2003 (SP-02-59) to construct the parking garage. At that time, the landscaping requirement based on construction costs was $101,565. The applicant proposed a total `landscaping' budget of $131,895. This value consisted of new plantings, but also significantly of a new irrigation system, cedar fencing, granite edging, and transplanted shrubs and trees. r The applicant has submitted new plans which indicate that the entire $131, 895 was not planted or installed. Rather, the value of the installed landscape and related material was $110,025. The value of the trees and shrubs proposed and approved in 2003 was for $58,350. The applicant is now proposing only $53,275 in trees and shrubs. The applicant is requesting credit for compost for flower beds and an expanded irrigation system. Staff does not support these credits and would like to ensure that the applicant is planting at least the value of trees and shrubs as approved in 2003. 1. The plans and landscape budget shall be revised to reflect an additional $5, 075 in new trees or shrubs for a minimum total of $58, 350 in trees and shrubs. The City Arborist has reviewed the plans and issued comments in a memo dated December 5, 2007. 2. The plans shall be revised to reflect the comments of the City Arborist per the memo dated December 5, 2007. Staff recommends the Board approve Site Plan # SP-07-87 subject to the conditions above. I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 9, 2008 Robert McEwing Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Parkway #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Site Plan #SP-07-87 Parking Garage Landscaping Dear Mr. McEwing: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer on January 8, 2008. Please note the conditions of approval including that you must apply for a zoning permit within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy Mc onough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. I U f Permit Number SP-42 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the reque information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. la OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax .sr n n L;,% 1rT a� q a 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 31APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, ad( phone & fax #): W"-1- - r. �.�- I,C �� fire 1 �OQ � � ► �:,r,F- � . i= l � 1� �•r) � �cr�, . + 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1700 Dri u� So-f-k �Xv 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 2C1O QC*N0 ('-s C_ 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Ups on Property (including description and size of each separate use) A� _ -� 1 r _ b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remai d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, if basement and mezzanine) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain)_14 _ I 2r Permit Number SP-4 -2 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the reque information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Ci � 0 l ,zfir(ina�A . A.rDW+ (?CAD W erjer+ tSr�o-t .T1 a 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, ad( phone & fax #): i-L"­1-t . V.,,,fired . VZOO ��nnr r�. t � In �•f-I� r, . i 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Drill,- , -1Z1'-1Yf11 I ►C (� na an 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) �20() ()C'�0 ('� G_ 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) ic60fnCii�0rt5 b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) nO (de-ice? ©rQD6%rz A c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remai .11.E M(m v, 44- %CcY d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, if basement and mezzanine) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) A% 6- elm Mai wd I /-Z -El � -A r roq 16Nw� �hck (2LO (4(CxA Dr 0&0 — C-) i 21-7 -�tnnt,4-�k 1 0049-' C-Ao - 0 it I is000-va Qmw- . () � i - fpof4'br -71 La4wco 4 R4 �T� 00)c)-- ollcA5 (s 0JA 00 11, �. 0010 - D 11 85 �atC`�zkbeA.s I � Rs QUto tt-- Dr No Text CI'I Y OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 27, 2007 City of Burlington Burlington International Airport c/o Heather Kendrew 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a draft agenda for the December 11, 2007 Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, <-�NY ` Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. i' CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 6, 2007 Heather Kendrew Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Parking Garage Landscaping Site Plan #SP-07-87 Dear Ms. Kendrew: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday December 11, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review B rd FROM: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner � V RE: Agenda #16, Site Plan Application #SD-07-87 DATE: December 6, 2007 Site plan application #SD-07-71 of City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport to amend a previously approved plan for a 297,000 sq. ft. three (3) level parking garage addition for 2,075 spaces. The amendment consists of revising the landscaping plan, 1200 Airport Drive. The applicant has been using and occupying the parking garage addition for a number of years without a Certificate of Occupancy in violation of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. A Certificate of Occupancy can not be issued because the applicant failed to comply with the approved landscaping plan. This application is an attempt to correct the landscaping plan so that a Certificate of Occupancy can be issued. The applicant received site plan approval in February 2003 (SP-02-59) to construct the parking garage. At that time, the landscaping requirement based on construction costs was $101,565. The applicant proposed a total `landscaping' budget of $131,895. This value consisted of new plantings, but also significantly of a new irrigation system, cedar fencing, granite edging, and transplanted shrubs and trees. The applicant has submitted new plans which indicate that the entire $131, 895 was not planted or installed. Rather, the value of the installed landscape and related material was $110,025. The value of the trees and shrubs proposed and approved in 2003 was for $58,350. The applicant is now proposing only $53,275 in trees and shrubs. l The applicant is requesting credit for compost for flower beds and an expanded irrigation system. Staff does not support these credits and would like to ensure that the applicant is planting at least the value of trees and shrubs as approved in 2003. 1. The plans and landscape budget shall be revised to reflect an additional $5, 075 in new trees or shrubs for a minimum total of $58, 350 in trees and shrubs. The City Arborist has reviewed the plans and issued comments in a memo dated December 5, 2007. 2. The plans shall be revised to reflect the comments of the City Arborist per the memo dated December 5, 2007. Staff strongly recommends the Board continue SD-07-87 because the applicant never picked up the placard to display on the property as required by state statute. Staff strongly emphasizes the importance that proper notice of the hearing is allowed for all interested parties. Airport Terminal Roadway & Expansion 12/5/07 As Builts Mike Lawrence LA Just 1 minor discrepancy in these plans. There are a number of plants listed on the drawing with no corresponding abbreviation in the Plant List: • Pip • Pin • Pis • Frp These abbreviations are listed in the Transplant Trees & Shrubs except they all letters are capitalized, so that may explain things. Otherwise, things look pretty good. Irrigation Lenend t water Source u a Flow Direction z FC Toro Super 800 Adjustabla Rotor - Full Circle iF Toro Sugar WO AdJustabke Rotor - Part Circle Toro 570. 12` w/noaale a Two mini S rotor (� Toro FZ flow P 220 Electric Valve (1•q © Zone ID C Toro Custom Commend ConWl*r Sloeving for PlpeNVin V Rain Sensor IV Quick Coupler 1 Irrigation Llns Un "alga 1" Irrigation Uns —JC— 314" irrigation Uns J -ar— Drip Tubing Gate Valve ❑ ❑ ❑ ° , ,'• 0 Proposed Expansion ofirrigatlon System ?%/ to ❑ ❑ W=V rIL q ° ❑ s nu i Note; Substitutions must be approved by Landscape Architect 0 G : ixr 3 ,:u .w :r"i ':�� ��. ryp �py ti�r.nrr,• r+u. lrndan b Uap .......,,a..r...r.....� .... :p. Ur IMF !C: � RECEIVED � W • t� Nan k hu Now 5?yC N awB� kl;ads and PI a , ^ 71L ° ti NOV 13 lA E `/i 2007 O > Now Sprinkler Heads Now Valve ,t1a, 0 �.lLy� /1� C C- N C 0 e •N t l/ 3PVC wave Rai". �M r.11.Mlry ,rM,,,. Q •�(j �I v/ S-- L7u1Illn 9ron W t M t I/ • z " 0 OOQ I z � � z - s O�.�. 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 r i V e N zd Sr/ne aLPrr /pivar/ J /peanq/ i� W m W W fq F a d _ > •�iM x A -Op n Ilk- O w " N C •.�,, 2 Uap m Garage 00 „� VC 7 •Co lid Sk»ve 0C� � `Sp `e'M wa•~.wr u,.w'.�.w. yam, ; �. M fn Uji `J O 4 C, / -- a o M O flarrr �a t _ 0 m •� 7 L tltl _ L cii New 1 412" Lk. pix •' N C C L O a4 0 L a O :B: X \ UJ m Tr r..e. 41%n �r � �� s, wcwnr„xw. 0 AC Tyr 0 0 IN r +. e L�, 2 55 cr coax r...... .a w(� n— 0 p a m n vas _ CL to A i r p o r t r e �E— � m mix cwe L L � t L-3 t r7, Permit Number SP-�-� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. address, phone and fax #) C c, 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3&ar1ir\uAr%r, APPLICANT (Name, mailing address,, phone and fax #)_ c�tlner � t% pt 4cN 1-4-k t,n h--u r+n to 1 k" i A4 O 1'LI O 3 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax ft I lzoC I i' r a ic+n . UT 0S Wp� 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: ZC �p �_ Dr; UK 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) '20("0 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing UTon Property (including description and size of each separate use b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) 00 n(CLL c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) w? i t ( A-L,w to �, e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) &J A- Post-ii® Fax Note 7g71 Date # of p s� To J, )/ N/ From Co /Dept. Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): kl; l l Savyl6jt-N g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: a) Building: Existing % / Proposed % / sq. ft. sq. ft. Sq. Ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing _% / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 72 Q * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping: $, c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): !y 14 b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): (J I A c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 2 lti / A 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 4 a 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: % 0-3 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 3 I I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: l / 3 v I REVIEW AUTHORITY: ? Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: —CJ Complete ❑ Wate of Planning & Zoning or Designee 4 Burlington International Airport Landscape Count from 2004 Parking Expansion Michael Charles Lawrence ASLA 6/4/2007 New Trees & Shrubs prop L-2 L-3 L-4 L-5 L-6 -7 otal unit Ceo Celtis occidentalis 3-3.5" 10 5 5 10 $500.00 $5,000.00 Paq Parthenocissus q #2 7 0 $35.00 $0.00 Pat Parthenocissus t. #2 60 0 $35.00 $0.00 Pia Picea abies 6-7' 8 4 4 8 $350.00 $2,800.00 Pic Picea abies nidiformis 24-30" 19 8 11 19 $125.00 $2,375.00 Pfa Picea pungens'Fat Albert' 5-6' 4 4 4 $450.00 $1,800.00 Pice Pinus cembra 4-5' 5 5 5 $450.00 $2,250.00 Pina Pinus nigra 6-T 34 174 9 41 1 34 $350.00 $11,900.00 Pinb Pinus nigra 7-8' 13 10 2 1 13 $450.00 $5,850.00 Pisn Pinus strobus'Nana' 24-30" 12 4 8 12 $125.00 $1,500.00 Pisy Pinus sylvestris'Globosa viridis' 24-30" 15 0 $125.00 $0.00 Pyc Pyrus calleryana'Cleveland' 2-2.5" 18 8 6 19 33 $350.00 $11,550.00 Pyu Pyrus ussuriensis ' Prarie Gem' 2-2.5" 15 0 $350.00 $0.00 Rob Rosa 'Blaze' #2 24 0 $60.00 $0.00 Tho Thuja occidentalis 6-7' 158 15 6 7 28 $100.00 $2,800.00 Uap Ulmus americana'Princeton' 3.5-4" 10 5 7 12 $750.00 $9,000.00 MEO $56, 825.00 Transplants Acr Acer rubrum 7 4 2 2 8 $200.00 Cat Catalpa speciosa 1 1 1 $200.00 Frp Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4 1 1 $200.00 Pia Picea abies 23 1 8 9 $200.00 Pin Pinus nigra 8 13 1 4 $200.00 Pis Pinus strobus 13 5 3 8 $200.00 Vit Viburnum trilobum 21 0 $50.00 Syr jSyringa Tree Lilac (additional) 21 1 2 $200.00 whats in place Evergreen trees 6-7' 42 42 $350.00 $14,700.00 43 Evergreens trees 7-8' 21 13 $450.00 $5,850.00 we specified 13 Evergreens shrubs 2-3' 46 31 $125.00 $3,875.00 15 scotch Evergreen shrubs 4-5' 5 5 $300.00 $1,500.00 spec'd these at 4-5 Evergreen shrurbs 5-6' 4 4 $450.00 $1,800.00 line above Deciduous trees 3.5-4" 10 12 $750.00 $9,000.00 added 2 elms Deciduous trees 2-2.5" 33 33 $350.00 $11,550.00 ok Deciduous trees 3-3.5: 10 10 $500.00 $5,000.00 ok Deciduous vines 67 0 $35.00 $0.00 caught in mowers Deciduous shrubs (roses) 24 0 $60.00 $0.00 caught in mowers Granite edging Is $6,000.00 ok Irrigation Is $28,000.00 $28,000.00 ok Transplanted trees 52 52 $200.00 $10,400.00 had losses Transplanted shrubs 21 21 $50.00 $1,050.00 had losses New Cedar trees 6-7' 158 28 $100.00 $2,800.00 lost 130 Cedar fence Is $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $110,025.00 -. Michael Lawrence Associates Landsc,ipe Architects / Site Planninq Cor-uultants Burlington Airport Parking Garage Landscaping Cost Estimate Jan 24, 2003 ITEM QU UNIT COST SUB -TOT Evergreen Trees 6-7' 43 350/ea 15,050 Evergreen Trees 7-8' 21 450/ea 9,450 Evergreen Shrubs 2-3' 46 125/ea 5,750 Evergreen Shrubs 5-6' 9 450/ea 4,050 Deciduous Trees 3.54" 10 750/ea 7,500 Deciduous Trees 2-2.5" 33 350/ea 11,550 Deciduous Trees 3-3.5" 10 500/ea 5,000 Deciduous Vines 67 35/ea 2,345 Deciduous Shrubs (roses) 24 60/ea 1,440 Granite Edging is 6,000 Irrigation is 28,000 Transplanted Trees 52 200/ea. 10,400 Transplanted Shrubs 21 50/ea 1,100 New Cedar Trees 6-7' 158 100/ea 15,800 New Cedar Fence 5601f 8,500As 8,500 TOTAL VALUE OF LANDSCAPING Flowers is Compost Soil Amendment 250 cy 45/cy t, �� MEMBLU Arneric,rn Society of Lardswpc Architects Eight Linden Lane Essex Junction, Vermont P/F 802 8/8 1_//8 net $131,895 20,000 11,250 *N-4 1 Michael Lawrence Associates Landscape Architects / Site Planning Consultants September 25, 2007 Mr. Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington South Burlington, VT Re: Adjustment of Landscape Items to comply with South Burlington Cost Requirements for Burlington International Airport's North Parking Garage Expansion. Dear Ray, We are submitting this letter and accompanying cost breakdown and plans to clarify the value of landscaping in place and a proposal for meeting the City of South Burlington's percentage of construction requirement for landscaping. Our original landscape budget number based on the construction value of the Airport Parking Garage expansion was $131,895. The value of the landscape material installed as part of the project is $110,025. In addition, $11, 250 worth of compost was introduced into planting beds. The figure was not included in the original budget submitted. We propose this as a credit. The enclosed plans represent $11,000 of new work to extend the irrigation system along the south and west sides of the existing garage adjacent to Airport Parkway and to add sprinkler heads along two narrow sections of lawn areas along the east side of the garage on either side of the original pedestrian bridge. Expenditure for this work ($132,275) will complete the South Burlington requirements. If you have any questions, please call at 878-2778. Sincerely, Michael Lawrence ASLA - MEMBLR !Amer+c,in Society Eight Linden Line Lssex Junction, Verrnornt 05 r�1 of Ltridscape Architects P/F 802 8/8 111E n�;l<ci.rwrcrx.e(�� rctclph; r nct k r gggL� Q � t is ®N S t White St 1* ? ; o o_- Z P a 2 r t OOGOONG) M Z FF 8 C a I I 0❑ i 11 �9II>3tM ry 0 oz M 4 \� Cn c c n \ m • 0o s R1 -° o < � A N \ w .9 ---M>ff911 LINE SEE SHEET L-2 ° SEE SHEET L-2 rTerminal Roadway & Expansion Project- 2004-2005 North ' Burlington International Airport South Burlington, Vermont Landscape & Irrigation Plan - As Built showing Proposed Irrigation Expansion - North End ° is Michael Lawrence d Associates Landscape Architects Essex Junction, Vermont °"w'1. SC." M—.b-12,2007 SEE SHEET L-1 taNe SEE SHEET L-1 N i — t blNE— m A � � m A N p hem O 0 3 i { Z N c g CD fJ CD n O •y� Cn T." O W S o D n A M S � W Hif�;;:: s Crr3 'ix tR€ o\ F s W w O F v943 y� , ii i ji O� q Wf �I � ^ �€ o� Jet` UPI Q� cjai T SEE SHEET L-8 W SEE SHEET L- = !F! Terminal Roadway at Expansion Project - 2004-2005 North ' Burlington International Airport South Burlington, Vermont R 1 Landscape & Irrigation Plan - As Built showing Proposed Irrigation Expansion - Mid Area ° ely Michael Lawrence 3 Associates Landscape Architects Essex Junction, Vermont Graphic Scale woven-12.2°°r Burlington International Airport NORTH� 2 Proposed Irrigation Layout Expansion - Parking Garage - Southeast Corner 2 of 2 Ora"Io Swb Npbmb-21, 2007 Michael Lawrence Assoc. Landscape Architects Essex Junction, Vermont • — — — -- — _ _ _ O I� • I Existing IrrigatioA SysteM AIRPORT CIRCLE I I I IBrldgw Existing Irrigation System IR IR I I Of 0 Add Adj Arc IR— — — 4 570 I I g Garage / I— —IR °� OI Entry �R ' Drive � o �o I v 00o I I O oc 1 1/4" _ r lPVC SIR leave O I�� 0 J Ex Syi under Drive oc Sleeve New o x o Irrigation Legend oho 0 Water Source Flow Direction e Toro Super 800 Adjustable Rotor - Full Circle 4 % Toro Super 800 Adjustable Rotor - Part Circle ■ Toro 570 -12" w/nozzle a Toro mini 8 rotor Dz Toro EZ flow P 220 Electric Valve (I") © Zone I D It Toro Custom Command Controller = Sleeving for Pipe/Wire 17 Rain Sensor Quick Coupler =;R=, 1 1/4" Irrigation Line —IR— 1" Irrigation Line —N'= 3/4" Irrigation Line --or— Drip Tubing % Gate Valve EmNew Irrigation System 0 Existing Irrigation System System E New Sprinkler Heads Existing and Pipe (typical) J1 1 /4" Line Parking Garage Terminal Building 721 Bridge Burlington International Airport NORTH A& Proposed Irrigation Layout Expansion - Parking Garage - East Central Area 1 of 2 G .phloawl. a.p "W z1, 2DO7 Michael Lawrence Assoc. Landscape Architect• Essex Junction, Vermont DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 AUGUST 2009 PAGE 6 seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 13. Miscellaneous Application #MS-09-07 of Twin Oaks Homeowners Association to alter the existing grade by removing more than 20 cubic yards of fill to reconstruct a storm water pond. Twin Oaks Terrace (Twin Oaks Condominiums): Mr. McClellan noted the Stormwater Superintendent supports this. Mr. Belair said staff has no issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Miscellaneous Application #MS-09-07 of Twin Oaks Homeowners Association subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Birmingham seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 14. Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 of Burlington International Airport to construct two additional parking levels to an existing two -level parking garage to accommodate 1370 vehicles, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. McEwing said this will be a phased project. Two levels will be added with a roof. On the roof they propose to add solar, a green area, and a viewing area. The finished structure will hold 1400 cars. The northern end will be built first. Mr. McEwing noted the existing structure is full almost all the time now. Mr. Dinklage raised the possibility of a pedestrian connection across Airport Drive. Mr. McEwing said they are not doing anything like that. There are existing crosswalks, and they don't see the need for anything additional. Ms. LaRose said there is a concern for pedestrians, even those not going to the Airport, since the addition will generate more traffic. Mr. Dinklage asked Airport people to work with staff on that issue as part of the traffic analysis. Mr. Dinklage raised the question of on -site traffic problems and asked if they are close to needing two ramp systems. Mr. DeBaie said that rental cars already have their own ramp system. He also noted that the garage never empties all at once. Ms. LaRose said she has been told the garage is very difficult to navigate. Mr. McEwing said they will improve lighting and provide lighted signs. Mr. Dinklage asked about landscaping and asked how much of the roof garden would count toward the requirement. Mr. Lawrence reviewed plantings and costs that would qualify. He gave members photos of the "green screen" on the roof perimeter. This would be composed of deciduous vines. Ms. LaRose noted the regulations require "trees and shrubs," so a waiver would be required for what the Airport is proposing. Mr. Belair said there is also the issue of whether this would create a precedent. Mr. Leinwohl said the building is already heavily landscaped. Ms. LaRose said there can be trees planted on other spots on the Airport site. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 AUGUST 2009 PAGE 7 Mr. Dinklage asked about lighting, specifically with hot spots being visible off the site. Mr. Leinwohl showed a rendering of what the lighting will look like. There are cut-off fixtures that can be used to shield fixtures on the outside. Mr. Dinklage asked about snow removal. Mr. Leinwohl said none is required. The solar panels will shed snow, and the green roof won't be open in winter time. Staff was OK with that. Mr. Dinklage noted the Fire Chief has expressed concern with communications within the structure. --Mr. Leinwohl said they will do a study on that and address any issues to the Chief s satisfaction. Mr. McEwing added that they just upgraded the system, and it is tested every morning. Mr. Dinklage said there will be the need for a 3`d party review of the traffic study. Ms. Quimby moved to invoke technical review of the traffic study. Mr. Birmingham seconded. Motion passed unanimously. A height waiver is being requested. There will be 69.5 feet to the top of the stair towers. Mr. Dinklage said the Board will need exact numbers. He suggested some berms to shield homes from noise as other houses are torn down. Mr. Leinwohl said they feel the mass of the building will help shield some of the noise. Ms. Quimby asked about the wind turbines. Mr. McEwing said they will face toward the Airport. Mr. Belair said that is exempt from local review. Mr. Birmingham asked if the turbines will power the whole airport or just the garage. Mr. McEwing said in the first phase it will power only the garage. It will later power the garage and some of the terminal. Ms. LaRose asked what else is being done to encourage less traffic on site. Mr. Worthen said they are exploring 6 off -site parking sites which will require shuttle service. They are also having discussions for a public service for Montreal passengers. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 of Burlington International Airport until 15 September 2009. Mr. Birmingham seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 11:10 P.M. 1 ' Cler1 a9 DZ'/0 ? Date T� 'CT rr TT *r I8 2� u1/4 S l i ® PHOTO VOLTAIC PANELS j (D� `- TF[T PHASE I ' .' ,,'" NORTH END -- Q PARKING GARAGE - 2 ADDED LEVELS & GREEN ROOF ', ' / 10 PISC 6 ' 13 - Y KEY 0051ING EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED — — —. — EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO Ii i7AIN UNDISTURBED 1 L� EXISTING EVERGREEN TREF TO BF TRANSPLANTED TO AIRFIELD NURSERY, ® SPORED k RFPIANIID AFTER GARAGE CONSiRUCf'® EUSTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE TRANSPLANTED TO AfAFFIF!!.D NURSBIY, 2 g STORED k REPLANTED Ai GARAGE CONSTRUCTED 3�EXISTPTG PLANT TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED wrm NEW PLWr OR PLANTS OF EQUAL VALUE SHOWN ON RANT LIST ZONE REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION CRANES (� NEW EVERGREEN TREE A I D r p 0 r t PHASE oz o A"RAIN o�4N { PHASE I M / II R� I �D . ` PHOTO VOLTAIC PANELS / �Of SO PHASE II BV'AngtOn SOUTH END PARKING GARAGE 2 ADDED LEVELS & GREEN ROOF PHASE LIST OF TREES TO BE TRANSPLANTED OR REMOVED AT NORTH END OF GARAGE - PI LASE I I Austrian Pine 12 ft 3 Norway Maple 5 in. 25 Cleveland Pear 4 in. __-37 Austrian Rne— 0 tt _ 47 5wlss Stone Pme___8 ft__ 2__ _ Hackbe ___ 4 in - 1 •4 Norway Maple _ 5 in. 26 Cleveland Pear 4 ,n 38 Austrian Pine_ I Ott 48 Swiss Stone Fine 6 ft 3 Common Lilac (G) G ft, 15 Crabapple 3 in. 27 Cleveland Pear 4 in. 30 Austrian Pine 10 it _ 4y _ Fat Albert�ruce _ 9 ft. 4 - Pine 1 2 ft_ - Arborvitae Bed 51 2) 3 in 28 Cleveland Pear_ 4 in 40_ Austrian Pine_ 10 ft, 50 Austrian Pine 12 ft 5 _Austrian Austrian Pine_ _ H ft _X �4 Blue 20 in. 23 _ Cleveland Pear 4 in __4_0A Perennial Carden 6' x 40' _ 51 _ Austrian Pine _ _ 1 2 ft G Austrian Pine _ 1 2 ft 18 -Spruce Austrian Pine I 0 ft. 30 Cleveland Pear_ 4 in 41 _ Fat Albert Spruce_ 0 ft 5r Austrian Pme _ ___ loft-- 7 Fine _ 9 ft 9 Austrian Pine _ 2 ft _ 31 Hackbe- 3 in _ 42 Suns_ 5tonc Ping G it_ _ 5.3 _ Cleveland Pear 3_in 8_- _Austrian Austrian Pine — 1 l ft - Austrian Pine 7 ft__ 32 Hackberry 3 in. __ _43 5wl55 5tone ni 7 ft _5_4_- Cleveland Pear__ - 3 in, _ E) - Austrian Pme -__ Oft __20 2 I Cleveland Pear 4 in 33 Hackberry 3 in. 44 5w55 stone Pine G ft _ 0 Austrian Pine 12 ft _ _ 22 Cleveland Pear _ ir. _ 34 _ Cleveland ear 3 in. 45 Fat Albert Spruce __ 10 ft Austrian Pme — - _ S ft 23 Cleveland Pear __4 4 r 35 Cleveland Pear 3 in _45A Perennial Garden G x_ 110' 2 Austrian Pine l ftft 24 _ Cleveland Pear 4 in. 3G _ _ Cleveland Pear 3 in. 4G Fat Albert Spruce ft BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT S O U T H B U R L I N T O N V E R M O N T PARKING GARAGE ADDITION AND GREEN ROOF LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING TREESTO BE TRANSPLANTED STORED AND REPLANTED AND NEW TREES - PHASE I - NORTH END AND PART OF PHASE II - SOUTH END F R E E M A N F R E N C H F R E E M A N A R C H 1 T E C T S B U R L I N G T O N, V E R M O N T M 1 C H A E L C H A R L E S L A W R E N C E A S L A L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T E S S E X J U N C T 1 O N , V E R M O N T H O Y L E, T A N N E R ASSOCIATES I N C B U R L I N G T O N, V E R M O N T S T A N T E C S O U T H B U R L I N G T 0 N, V E R M 0 N T O PLANT LIST AT NORTH END OF GARAGE KEY QUAN 5CENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE Piab 8 Picea abies Norway 5prucc 7-8 ft. Pist 10 Pmus strobus White Pine 7-8 ft, DATE: OCTOBER 2009 DWG SCALE. 1 '. =GOB i 0 65' 130' 1 •+ GRAPHIC SCALE 3 DRAwN' MCL • Q e ;I ofso pa9 B Gz /Z, i' r i M1wM� rIn � C 1�1 PHOTO VOLTAIC PANELS— • • PHASE II SOUTH END PARKING GARAGE --------� — 2 ADDED LEVELS & GREEN ROOF ��Ddlr — --__-- — / O 6 '/ / , . ' ' O New Sidewalk ' '' / / / ; Ad M vmn, 1. w>wa �r / New PHASE II New Z o Crosswalk J C] A i r p o r t Q r i V e Crosswu& - Y_-_- 1 ° 1 O 4 LIST OF TREES TO BE TRANSPLANTED OR REMOVED AT SOUTH END OF GARAGE - PHASE II PLANT LIST AT SOUTH END OF GARACE 55_ _ Cleveland Pear 3 in G 7 Hor5eche5tnut _ _ 8 n_ — 78 _Austrian Pine _3_5 ft. 90 Ja ap nose Tree Lilac 4 in. 102 White Svr � _ _ White race _ 20 ft 5G _ Cleveland Pear 3 in _ 28_ Horsecheetnut _ _ 8 in_ 78_ Austrian Pine _20 ft._ 91_ White 5pruce 20 ft. 103 _ White Spruce _ 22 _ft _ _ 1 15 _White ce _ 20 ft_ KtY C]IJAN SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME 512E _ 57 Cleveland Pear _ 3 in --G L'__ Prostrate_ White Pine (4) _ 80 Austrian Pine _ 30 ft_ _ 92 _ White Spruce 20 ft. 104 White Spruce _ 22 fL _ _ 111; —�i�pru ,5ce 20 ft Pub G Picea abie5 White Spruce 7-8ftL __ 58 _ Japanese Tree Lilac 4 in _ G9A _ Perennial Garden (,' x 80 81 Whi�lUh 4 in. 33_-White Spruce 20 ft- 105 White Spruce 22_ft 1 17 White 5pruce _— 25 ft_ Japanese Tree Lilac 4 in _7t White Pine8 iri _ 82 _ White S�ru_ce _ 1 ft.— _�4 _White 5pruce 20 ft I OE White Spruce _ 22 f` _ 118__ White Spruct 22 ft— Pist 15 IFinus strobus White Pine 7-01C White 5pqII 20 ft _ �3 — White Pmc 8 in_ _ _ 83 Servlceberry - 4 n. _ 9 White Pine - 35 ft J07 5erviceberry _ z n _ I a___-_6I5Fruce 25 ft___ White Pine_ _5 in— _-_ 84 Austrian Pine I 8 f', _ �� White 5pnice_ ft 108 5erviceber 2 in 120 White Ash 8 n. G2 White 5priJGe—_ _—I8 1 5 ft �9 White Pine _ 10 iri ___ -85 Avtrq n Pine __ 1 5 ft__ 97_ White Spruce — 18 ft. I ce _ 5erAcebany 2 in _ — _ _ _-G3____LA hite 5p_ruoe 1_5 ft74 Au5tnan Pine 20 f= _A�z _ 5 _ennccbcrry____ 4 in 98 Lilacs (5) G ft. -1 10 White 5prI 20 ft G4 _ Servlceber y _ 3 in. _ _ _ Silver Maple ___ 3G m_ _ White Pint _--____1_S in. 99 Ulacs {G) G ft- I I I White Spruce 20 ft G5 Princeton Elm8 _ in _Via` Silver Merle 22 In _ AU5tnan Pine _ _18in, _ _ 100 White Ash _ 8 in. 1 12 White Spruce 20 ft GG_-___1jom=5tnut ­­3 in - _ 77 White Spruce_ _ 18 ft _— 0 Ja im;se Tree Lilac 4 in 0 1 White 59ruce 22 ft 1 13 White Spruce 20 ft _ B U R L I N G T O N I N T E R N A T I O N A L A I R P O R T S O U T H B U R L I N T O N V E R M O N T DATE: OCTOBER 2009 Ews, PARKING GARAGE ADDITION AND GREEN ROOF LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING TREESTO BE TRANSPLANTED, STORED AND REPLANTED AND NEW TREES - PART OF PHASE 11 - SOUTH END SCALE. 1 "=60' O 65' 130] F R E E M A N F R E N C H F R E E M A N A R C H I T E C T S B U R L I N G T O N, V E R M O N T M I C H A E L C H A R L E S L A W R E N C E A S L A L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T E S S E X J U N C T 1 O N V E R M O N T GRAPHIC SCALE H OY LE, TAN NER ASSOCIATES INC. B U R L I N G T O N, V E R M O NT S T A N T E C S C, U T H B U R L I N G TO N. V E R M 0 N T DRAWN MCL I North Sout r I 'O t St S, S, , Si&tBt 5 YSI. s,- - - St ' - -Sat _ S, St ', A„'s • �. 12 "° �ss_ 5' sz %2 - 05»s= Rf oA As •g, 'fo1 Is•fir - $1 51 F 7s rS2 ° S7 . 2.' rL i�,us i ' S1F' i� ,' $i os2° �P,V� St;' �� .. st a $2 IS .. $t' I' I °5 I --- �. sl TYPE S1/SB (LED DUAL LEVEL LIGHTING W/ SENSOR Rrm Candva Nestle— aLD•/WY-77- -all. LED -a - - ]a I,n mml N MiJ.I duFW.x "A� u u• W Is sr TYPE S2 hA f TYPE $1 twin t. — opao 1f• "1rnAwfeef0 P-ft-- Fbhw DIG'•^• y'•"�.�f: .u:r�"Wi•r'H'•. "' ALD FWY T7' aea, 014 U.-A C11L M �f_Iwt Detr (12—Ow[ OHIrtrUL•n (I]fOfwfaf, lutl SlvhsyuO,F Oea' U.—I) WIH GFL-aLml(1]f/31f Mt•ynbl.u•rA-mlr, onr oUN ]�wv �e C1T>-1.6GM tonfO Hl.uYwl u•rw s.unl)„ UW"-r I71¢a-2L 011]!x/I•r�.ol..Gv nnwp'r 1312 af] all, F-- •-.�rw+•�..` �r� M.. ,-..i..l....i..r �.r��wrr wr,..wi...wrr,r...,.r�.i� LED hrArm.vw Can...it.. a SpaeP ryrrA. enr� /M41 D•IM.•x Ni•en- W.rM ..I LCat nl0eae if-TlY al]OOV A rr•G+• ,.�yu.n.a., zf A tau hM LLD Ifee fi•4 aY•M Wm..M, WI lJtf] eoo-iliAae ww..M.uD.aA- JI Ff'S Emergency 4 Maintenance ' AOGe55 to Weet 5tair Tower (5) Est LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC 'LAN — ROOF SCALE 1• . 20' TYPE Q (LED) hefalr I hllncJl I hNaN CUTOFF Wall Forms`WF22 Cutoff Face Surface Mount, Round IaM LIONTM :x1nn 1111)roR • M72,.0 Type: Approvals: Job:1 ILLUMINANCE VALUES FOR COMPARISON FULL MOONUGHT 01 TO 1 FOOT-CANDLE Catalog number: I PREDAWN 1 TO 1 FOOT-CANDLE WINDOWED ROOM ON 6-a FOOT-CANDLES VT22 l I A CLOUDY DAY BEACH IN BRIGHT SUNLIGHT 30.000 FOOT-CANDLES n n n-r �a Mnh . R f ni•'I-rr TABLE FROM OUTDOOR LIGHTING MANUAL FOR VERMONT MUNICIPALITIES Data. Page: 7 of 3 Specifications Surface Mount: l)Irr,0,, k,w m]Fxl 1. 0 R:4(ta.11tlntl-allrilr with double side walls. tax plated gee Twunting plate supplied ix mounting to W trod Y ur 4'tunabun bux. CONTOUR LEGEND Face lisItrte: Die cast low cq' ' ;<U.6!: Col aluminum allq' wnli tenical and horizontal double nlu, Covell tfte ndl htmuphem. Rlha aro o i 1t' Lkllhi I,d ark' di,U— Sex 1- to Luuxnlg .,it. lour sWnless steel c ptive socllet head forms. CuEelf Pen: 5.1,d upper hdt And wbd I—r li.li wid, .rro-1 light Wili'x- Lrens: FId Ivni'led glusa, n' 1111 ,Ur,, dtai— wilt uilenl,I snt�e �gl lu'Tp st Rs.'14irrL11 In iaw pleu: A,W xvkA Wd, a uix:-pi N siliwiu Socket: (1110): Porcelaln medium bme socket rated 4KV ;Huaescen0: Plastic GX24q t IGKt4q 4 bout —1,n. No socket for LED 11 J-bUx nt':.:dl by "Unr:. Ballast• All rnnylrx 1, ntnunred - 1--i; 'H11))- lk ar— Mpph Cutoff Face power iictDr whh =mng tempemwro of 40`F, for I IP5 and 201, is e¢urN WRMNewN surfava Mount P,'Al I Imlltf iiaxk.. Fur PMI I�.O wile A su;r,up uwnk,ritirr a pr i idrd, M Fur I IPSC_77 -IL 4 step-dwcn use lultxr n pnnirkrJ. Fur PM IPW3,; IL A step iluvnt buivialnr Is prut•itkd ;Fluurcss,exiU' RECEIVED filupxdAwl wilt du'rnwl tutor EIL'Ltruuu wilt multi-wltAgo UUW lU 1DRV) Inlx¢, SiV611 H/, Kgi I.— iititFH w I[ ♦IxnnlN fixtgx•rlun'r m 41'F L® Opaca]syennr A t-I ur 111 rn emitNxv r sxntgtrtM In A MMYrguLr Anny i nnyrxrrl nytwlhn A• A nrcdulr Two 21 nxdulre hi i(K4 r+ixxvt ED AsuilAbleln"HAIu�{.n WhItW,Approc 3SlHlKi Fminers aMNre tly 4Llxh.d Wp22 w,thLW n1111. rlw lii.iir rlrnw OIt�g1 r.9D'd LED orlwr: I Ur Lu,.WI,L w tor¢ L'lV ArU,,iu JriM.'r(s) R U d iu JUL 17 2009 1,5—ni-h 15W-'NH1Int 'WW rl Nf l)Im. AVAIIAHr in I_ IV nr 277V =pt.I, -uw rh 1Milingg trmprrahiir. All dirn nm t:nrlmLTNnA Cis LtDNtCrin rccolatized. i.. Finish. Siyxr TGIC Hpplindimtiinri pulynler pMwda a.Mt pAiriL 25 bi,l City of So. Burlington uuniluxl ddi lvxNF, l irvTr ds,ivaiod Ar<uniurn xxt Inu mnhtl�. 1GaT h-, Anit girt) knt-1-ir.nm rting. %Mndwd mkx LIY AIIF NLtrk, I )mk Rmnve, I Ighr ( Ir y, S-1d, (;my", I'I.•ninum tile-, nr Wh,. I! W CustW Colas ¢Ie avaiYbla Flnlahltq Itar]rr. HltrtNral ntMules And wce plants harh I of ¢nlAlnng nunw Alwll lir In i ur umn.iour, r kwrly nrarluAl w hh Ilx' liven• UpIY Jlran0lfion oiWng it-hrr- cutoff Fane CAUTION: H1Atuhf ni ba g wn" ri1 aadavx- with ivUmal, Atria, -111. 6tra1 M-rirnl nxlr_A FAduiµ I,. do to I- i-I, in a<ntury m"-i• per— rpn. ROOF LEVEL ,� 1'1 rf7 K4R' IPiH, R.tnl an ,7 zW An1ut. PHOTOMETRIC '4iii,Mx Lx ,FFi w Me e1TLN]a: O,x �p+a, Il,x Air, ilAln,•.'i xNt }Tx.R=-FF'174FFtFA ixG 3n3"ir-',HAI�,i'i:+:i"rl-HA ri'iG' i'N kA•I AMLIGH INGINC••O NAIWI OIR OF INOVeTAF r.Ae,T,entl•rE1 w'Laeeel..--Qioseins. siossatrf EP-101 BURLINGTON AIRPORT OVERALL SITE SECTION STUDY PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION SORLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT J Arnt 17. 2001 AIRPORTTERMINA: W,CANORY ULL Zs 'fin N U T a C::Icl o J� I II / V 6 O SEC ON O� Dia o❑ Y KEY :„ AN ABM freeman I french I freeman kwlNm I InNwl I knmrtn I r• 2 J- I i I WEST ELEVATION - - -101 ZI JUL 17 0 - -7. Am RA ,-" -., J - - ..� r:,-, CI + of S su - i �n9ton - -- - .. � - - sNORTH ELEVATION e SOUTN ELEVATION PARKING _pp S .Le. 1/32' - p-o• �Le. I�z• . I,�, EXPANSION 20 PROJECT 2 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT n�a I.. tOV MNILINONN VEIIMOM I - . � r ! t r r ,_• �•� ti tS !S t - _ _I ti .w FL FfF Ipils RT 4TA1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EAST ELEVATION \t::2Y0 SCJ.LM 1/16' . Ir-0- A-201 E l E) II�I����1� � a �■�i _ lull"����; i \•J V L% l'J �'l L'l LJ O EXTENT OF SOLAR POWER SYSTEM U U � tXXMM EJVAN" .y-PAW ----j ULM PLAN n m r., <, — � R J4 F� C/4-of4qQ 6- PARKING EXPANSION PROJECT 2 BURLINGTOI I _ - INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT wum�� u.o+ox urrt �� A0907.00 JSMI FL AH n..c.me ecr mnva N Wn Levu i GREEN ROC PLANS A- l 02 Ell 3rd LEVEL PLAN M©1 PARKING EXPANSION PROJECT 2 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT xum wwunoiox n�roxr A0907.00 OLII/01 I'-0' Jan ►N na-iae xr 3rd i 4th LEVEL PLANS A-101 m --------- �..M.. n,•� •...M• --:---------- —,— .,.,...mow..•, M 4 • r o CMD I 520 ® �^ 53 51� © 54� 55® 56® 5M 59. 61® YHUIU VUL I All; PANELS SOUTH END 2 PARKING GARAGE i 2 ADDED LEVELS &GREEN ROOF o 11 4r In PIS, y - O �F 4 PIAB 5 MST w� • 3. 77(a) 82 ;01 10 03 104 w ® - 9 ( 111W16 I18�"7 8 5 a�O9�117r� 9� G 10 - _ - ® .� PARKING 6 81 � 10 ' EXPANSION PROJECT 2 v e _ - A I r P - 0 r t D r BURLINGTON -- — - -_ _ — - - ---- ----- _ - - — -- - - -- ° - - _--L - - -INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT d LANDSCAPE PLAN II 0 30' JO' 99 GRAPHIC SCALE _ _ �wnx winax°mx LIST OF TREES TO BE TRANSPLANTED OR REMOVED AT SOUTH END OF GARAGE PLANT LIST AT SOUTH END OF GARAGE ?ROIM Aovo7.00 55 Cleveland Pear 3 in. G8 _ Horsechestnut 8 in. 80 Austrian Pine 30 ft. 93 te 5 ruce 20 ft I OG White 5 ruce 22 ft 1 1 9 White 59ruce 25 ft. 5G Cleveland Pear 3 in. G9 Prostrate White Pine 4 2 ft. 81 White Ash 4 in. White 5 ruce 20 ft. 107 Servicel7erry 2 in. 120 White Ash 8 in. 57 Cleveland Pear 3 in. G9A Perennul Garden G' x 80' 452 White 5 ruce 15 ft. 95 White Pine 35 ft. 108 Serviceberry 2 in. 58 Japanese Tree Lilac 4 in. 6t White Pine 8 in 83 5emceberry 4 in 9G White Spruce 18 ft 109 5cmceberry 2 in. 59 Japanese Tree Lilac 4 in. White Pine 8 in. 84 Austrian Fine 18 ft. 97 White Spruce _ 18 ft 1 10 _ White 5 ruce _,_ 20 ft. co White 512rurn 20 ft, White Pine 8 in. Ar Austrian Fine 15 ft. 98 Lilacs 5 G ft I I I White 5 ruce 20 ft. G I White 5 ruce 18 ft. White Pine 10 in Ar Scmceberry 4 in. 99 Lilacs (G) G ft. 1 12 White 5 ruce 20 ft. G2 White 5 ruce 15 ft. 74 Austrian Pine 20 ft. White Pine 15 m. 100 White Ash 8 in. 1 13 White 5 ruce 20 ft. G3 White 5pruce 15 ft. >< 5i1ver Maple 3G in. Austrian Pine 18 in. 101 White 5 ruce 22 ft 1 14 White 5pruce 20 ft 5cmccberry 3 in. Silver Maple 22 in 59 Japanese Tree blac 4 in. 102 White 5pruce 22 ft. 1 15 White 5 ruce 20 ft. Princeton Elm 8 m. 77 White 5 ruce 18 ft. 90 Japanese Tree Lilac 4 m 103 White Spruce 22 ft I I G Whit r ft GG H r 5 in 78 Austrian Fine 35 ft. 91 White 5 ruce 20 ft. 104 White 5 ruce 22 ft. I 17 White 5 ruce 25 ft. G7 Honechestnut 8 in. 79 Austrian Pine 20 ft. 92 White Spruce 20 ft. 105 White 5 ruce 22 ft. 1 18 White 5 ruce 22 ft KEY OUAN SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE Piab 6 Picea abies White SProce 7-8 R. PI -St 15 Pmus strobus White Pine 7-8 ft. mjie%Dg r=w. Mwa wa mhirm LANDSCAPE PLAN (SOUTH END) LA .c Eloo 13 0 oj 11-1�) cm 19� 20421Q 23 �. 25 \ 22* ©24* 26 /`� .A r^19 01 Ei ce O----- ------ i ------- C M cm) ® I 346©�3�32 © 33 0C) 354 0* 4 ` PHOTO VOLTAIC PANELS NORTH END PARKING GARAGE 2 ADDED LEVELS & GREEN ROOF A I r P o r t D r 0 !6 1 1 4b 10 0 v • • f J I v e h LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 30' 69 90, GRAPHIC SCALE 4 r KEY E%ISiMG EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN UNDISTIMED IXI.S 1 DECIDUOUS TREE TO REM,VN UNDISTURBED EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE TO BE TRANSPLANTED TO AIRFIELD NURSERY. I STORED & RFPIANTED AFTER GARAGE CONSTRUCTED EX 2 O IS LNG DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE TRANSPLANTED TO AIRFIELD NURSERY, SPORED & REPLANTED AFTER GARAGE CONSTRUCTED 3 EXISTING PLANT TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW PLANT OR PLANTS OF EQUAL VALUE SHOWN ON PLANT LIST ® NEW EVERGREEN TREE LIST OF TREES TO BE TRANSPLANTED OR REMOVED AT NORTH END OF GARAGE I I Austrian Pine 12 ft 2 HaGkbcrry 4 in. 3 Common Lilac (G) G ft. 4 Austrian Pine 12 k. 5 Austrian Fine 9 ft. G Austrian Pine 12 ft. 7 Austrian Fine 9 ft. 8 Austrian Pine 12 k. 9 Austrian Pine 10 ft. 10 Austrian Pme 12 ft. I I Austrian Fine 15 ft. 12 Austrian Pine 12 ft. 13 Norway Maple 5 in 14 Norway Maple 5 in. 15 Crabapple 3 in. Arborvitae Bed (1 2) 3 in Blue 5 ruce 20 in. 18 Austrian Pine 10 ft. 19 Austnan Pine 12 k. 20 Austnan Pine 7 ft 21 Cleveland Pear 4 in. 22 Cleveland Pear 4 in. 23 Cleveland Pear 4 in 24 Cleveland Pear 4 in. 25 Cleveland Pear 4 in. 2G Cleveland Pear 4 in. 2.7 Cleveland Pear 28 Cleveland Pear 4 in. 29 Cleveland Pear 4 in. 30 Cleveland Pear 4 in. 31 Mackberry 3 in 32 Hackberry 3 in. 33 Fiackberry 3 in. 34 Ieveland Pear 3 in. evean car in. SO 39 Austrian Pine 10 ft. 40 Austrian Pine 10 ft. 4OA Perennial Garden G' x 40' 41 Fat Albert 5 ruce 9 ft. 42 5wi55 5tone Pine G ft. 43 5wi55 Stone Pine 7 ft. 44 5wi55 Stone Fine G ft 45 Fat Albert 5 ruce 10 ft. 45A Perennial Garden G' x 1 10 4G Fat Albert Spruce 9 ft. 47 5wi55 Stone Pine 8 ft. 48 5wi55 Stone Pine G ft. 49 Fat Albert 5 ruce 50 Austnan Pine 12 ft. 51 Austnan Pine 12 ft. 52 Austnan Pine 10 ft. 53 Cleveland Pear 3 in. 54 Cleveland Pear 3 in. PLANT LIST AT NORTH END OF GARAGE KEY QUAN SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME 51ZE Piab 8 Picea abies Norway 5pruce 7-8 ft. Fist 10 1 Pmus strobus White Fine 7-8 ft. v_+ ✓ cFj �`S10 04 O PARKING EXPANSION PROJECT 2 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT .OIIIM.111.IROfON viax PROJ• A0907.00 07/18/09 Win•--V rLICL RG. �. •M!m LANDSCAPE PLAN (NORTH END) L.3 Planting G" Deep Module 5'-G" dram. Mid size 5edum5 Solar Panels i Greenscreen Walk Circular - B1ue5tone Walk 4' --G" wide - - Planting / 4" Deep Modules - / -Low 5edum5 West Overlook —�- Terrace ' 5 x 1 4' North 5tairtower m 4 Elevator South Elevator Tower s a 0 Z Poly Self -Watering Planter (typ) Phase I Phase II Greenscreen (typ) North South Planting 4" Deep Modules Gathering Terrace 10' wide Overlooking Airfield # Low 5edum5 Green Mountains 9' x 50' West Overlook West Overlook G' Wide Bluestone South 5tair Tower Terrace Terrace Walk along Edge Phase I Phase II 259 L 12 x 50' 12 x 25' Bench Planting 4" Deep Module Low 5edums 4' Bluestone Poly 5elf-Watering Walk 40 Quart Planter 2G"L x 19-3/4"W x I ('.1 /2"H 3' Bluestone i 4 fa!lon Water `-apac,xy- Walk �5' Walk with Vine - I gallon sae. to 5tairtower Boston Ivy, Virginia Creeper, (. Planting Trumpet Honeysuckle G" Deep Module 15' dram. Mid size 5edum5 Plantmg 2'-G" Walk G., Deep Module 5' Circular Walk 15 x 18' 3'-G" Bluestone Mid size 5edum5 - -- Walk - - _ - - Expansion Joint PARKING - Solar Panels Solar Panels -- - _ EXPANSION - -- - - - - - PROJECi2 - -4' Bluestone - - - Walk - BURLINGTON -INTERNATIONAL Emergency E Maintenance - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - _ - - -AIRPORT Access to West Stair Tower (N) - Maintenance Walk _ - - - West Stair Tower (5) MtO1M A0907.00 ve JUL 200 Of SO. GREEN ROOF PLAN .��. BU��ngtOn 0 16' 32' 48, PLANN ROOF GRAPHIC SCALE W Garage Access for Rental Cars Garage Exit Payment Booths I"" Long Term Parking O � Airport J Main Vehicle Exit Solar Panels FAA Facility 4 Garage Elevator North ' Circular Form - 100 ft. diameter East West Walk - 180 ft. across Mountain Views to the East UVM Views to the West Xeric (drought resistant) Vegetation Greenscreen Vine Covered Fenemg Benches Garage to Airport Bridge North Main Terminal Garage Elevator F South Garage to Airport Bridge F South `— Curbside Dropoff Area Taxi E Van lane °"'�` , "" Solar Panels Wng LinNorth < 5outh Gardens ' Trapezoid Form - 70 x 70 ft. 330 ftJend to end with Eastern Mountain Views ' Mountain Viewing Areas Benches ' Xenc (drought resistant) Vegetation Edged with Detailed Mum ' Greenscreen Vine Covered Fencing of Xenc Vegetation ' Benches ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN 0 69 120' 10' GRAPHIC SCALE Equipment Storage 4 Cell Phone Tower for North Phase L Airport Main Vehicle Entrance [a ewunhweh hN nx.`wr.w.w�wwo� 'QF c 100 09 So 0 PARKING EXPANSION PROJECT 2 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT lWfx WIILIXOTIIM w�arrt T PROM A0907.00 m/16/0e r-co' Mwa ua �rMMa ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN LA LOCATION MAP OWNER Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Ph: (802)863-2874 Fax: (802)863-1526 ARCHITECT Freeman French Freeman, Inc. 81 Maple Suet, F.O. Box 306 Burlington, Vermont 06401 Ph: (802)864-6844 Fax: (802)860-1815 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER Engelberth Construction, Inc. P.O. Box 250 463 Wuntain View Drive CoichPst;r., Vermont 05466 Ph: tout) 655,0611 Fax. (802)655a882 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Michael Lawrence AE soclates 8 Linden Lane Essex, Vr. 05452 Ph: (802)878-2778 Fax: (802)878-2778 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Hoylejanner @ Associates, Inc. 125 College street, 4th Floor Burlington, VT 05401 Ph: (802) 860-1331- Fax: (802)860-6499 MECH. / ELEC./ PLUMB. ENGINEERS Stantec 54 RL 106 P 0. Box 29 North Springfield, VT. 05150 Ph: (802)886-2261 Fax: (802)886-2260 CIVIL ENGINEERING Stantec 55 Green Mountain Drive P.O. Box 2246 South Burlington, VT 05407 Ph: (802) 864-0223 Fax: (802) 864-0165 J PARKING EXPANSION PROJECT 2 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT OPEN AIR PARKING STRUCTURE PERMIT SET FOR SOUTH BURLINGTON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROPOSED OVERALL GARAGE ADDITION freeman I french I freeman 81 Maple Street • Burlington Vermont 05401 802-864�6844 •www.ffFinc.com Architecture • Planning • Interiors A-000 TITLE SWEET LANDSCAPE L-1 ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN L-2 GREEN ROOF PLAN L-3 LANDSCAPE PLAN (NORTH END) L-4 LANDSCAPE PLAN (SDUTN END) ARCHITECTURAL A-101 3N ! 4h LEVEL PUNS A-WL 5th LEVEL ! GREEN ROOF PUNS AIM EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-202 OVERALL SITE SECTION STUDY ELECTRICAL EP-WI ROOF LEVEL PWOfCMETRIC of�0 ev 9tOn = DATE 08 RESS SET § � � \ \ \,\ �\\ §i \ . \\ \\ (:»j \/»i:� \ \`� �..� /� � j � � \ � \ \ \\� E «/\ ^� \ � ( \«\ ° `\. \\ /\ r � G iLR u 0 a c ° 6 O c O ao no N _ � O yO �` A 6. LL N m TABLE OF CONTENTS • Cover Sheet/Table of Contents • Schematic Renderings- Birdseye View • Schematic Renderings- Plan View • Schematic Renderings- Roadside View • View Corridor - Views from Airport Drive • View Corridor - Views from Ledoux Terr., Elizabeth St., Patrick St. • Night time Light Study - Exterior Elevations • Overall Site Plan • Green Roof Master Layout Plan • North End Landscape Plan and Schedule • South End Landscape Plan and Schedule • 3rd and 4th Level Plans • 5th and Green Roof Level Plans • Overall Exterior Elevations • Overall Site Section Study • Roof Level Photometric Burlington International Airport PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION So, Burlington, Vermont, USA South Burlington Design Review Board freeman I french I freeman ... __ Fmrli Flwmn. — k 0 G - 11 47, TO w r D �+. 'r. 't`Iti r�� 1'I ls� ,;t. f ma'{`, T, m •` fi _ '7 m n 1 • 4, Burdf`ngton International Airport a� Parkin Garage g g Expansion February 10, 2009 rIF mm ym• _ �.I lYmlrlr.mw) �� MA fff freeman 1 french freeman VIEW FROM AIRPORT DRIVE NORTH BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BURUNGTON,VERMONT VIEW CORRIDORS VIEW FROM AIRPORT DRIVE SOUTH 27 MAY2009 A0907 freeman I french freeman •-u ` PROPOSED ADbrFION r----Z- '� t- -----.----------- EXISTING GARAGE a _ fin, Y • `S ' r DITION ;°" r a' EXISTING GARAGEi OPGtSE,a- EXISTING GARAGE ft VIEW FROM AIRPORT DRIVE - BEFORE PHOTOGRAPHED 6/17,109 AT E:45 PM BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BURUNGTON, VERMONT NIGHT TIME LIGHT STUDY VIEW FROM AIRPORT DRIVE - AFTER 25JUNE2009 A0907 freeman I french I freeman Garage Access for Rental Cars Garage Exit — Payment Booths IITTTM1 i7TTL LonlgI Tam Fariung IIIIIIIIIIU 0 Airport J Main Vehicle Exit Solar Panels FAA Facility 4 /"....a•....I T....— Garage Elevator North �cs5ivic orccn Nuui Circular Form - 100 ft. diameter East West Walk - 180 ft. across Mountain Views to the East UVM Views to the West Xenc (drought resistant) Vegetation Greenscreen Vine Covered Fencing Benches Garage to Airport Bridge North Garage Elevator South —Garage to Airport Bridge South I-- Curbside Dropoff Area Linking North E South Gardens • Trapezoid Form - 70 x 70 ft. 330 ft./end to end with Eastern Mountain Views " Mountain Viewing Areas Benches ' Xenc (drought resistant) Vegetation ' Edged with Detailed Mix ' Greenscreen Vine Covered Fencing of Xeric Vegetation • Benches BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT S O U T H B U R L I N T O N V E R M O N T PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION 2 ILLUSTRATIVE MASTER PLAN F R E E M A N F R E N C H F R E E M A N A R C H I T E C T S B U R L I N G T O N, V E R M O N T M I C H A E L C H A R L E S L A W R E N C E A S L A L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T E S S E X J U N C T 1 O N, V E R M O N T H O Y L E, TANNER A S S O C I A T E S INC. B U R L I N G T O N, VERMONT STANTEC S O U T H B U R L I N G T O N, VERMONT Taxi * Van lane Eciuipment Storage 4 Cell Phone Tower for North Phase '-- Airport Main Vehicle Entrance Solar Panels No DATE: JULY, 2009 DWG SCALE: 1 "=150' �~ 0 150' 300' GRAPHIC SCALE DRAWN: MCL l 1 i� North Stairtower m # Elevator South Elevator Tower s 0 Z Poly Self -Watering o — Planter (typ) Planting G" Deep Module Phase I Phase II Greenscreen (typ) 5'-G" dram. North South Mid size 5edum5 Planting Gatherin Terrace 4" Deep Modules g 1 O' wide Overlooking Airfield E Low 5edum5 Green Mountains West Overlook West Overlook 9' x 50' G'Wide Bluestone South Stair Tower Terrace Terrace Walk along Edge Solar Panels Phase I Phase II 250' L 12 x 50' 12 x 25' Bench i l� Greenscreen Planting i I 4" Deep Module Low Sedums 4' Bluestone Poly Self -Watering Walk 40 Quart Planter 20"1 x 19-3/4"W x 10-1 /2"H 3' Bluestone 4' Bluestone Walk 4 Gallon Water Capacity 5' Walk Walk I with Vine - I gallon size. to 5tairtower Boston Ivy, Virginia Creeper, Planting Trumpet Honeysuckle G" Deep Module 15' diam. Mid size 5edum5 Planting 2'-G" Walk Circular G" Deep Module Bluestone Walk 5' Circular Walk 1 5 x 1 8' 4'- G" wide 3'-G" Bluestone Mid size 5edum5 i Walk Expansion Joint Solar Panels Solar Panels 00 Planting 4' Bluestone 4' Deep Modules Walk Low 5edums Emergency b Maintenance West Overlook Access to West Stair Tower (N) Terrace 8 x 14' Maintenance Walk West Stair Tower (5) i 34 i B U R L I N G T O N I N T E R N A T I O N A L A I R P O R T N 01 DATE: JULY, Zoos DWG S O U T H B U R L I N T O N, V E R M O N T PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION 2 GREEN ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1"=40' ��� F R E E M A N F R E N C H F R E E M A N A R C H I T E C T S BURLI N G T O N VERMONT M 1 C H A E L C H A R L E S L A W R E N C E A S L A L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T E S S E X J U N C T 1 O N V E R M O N T O 40' 80, H O Y L E. TANNER A S S O C I A T E S I N C. B U R L I N G T O N, V E R M O N T GRAPHIC SCALE DRAWN: MCL S T A N T E C S O U T H BUR L I N G T O N, V E R M O N T ♦� �'h� -� D�II /1�111 /1�11 /III � �� ■ /III /IA11 /1�11 /LUI �j� - 9) ��' I� al.l I•��i �% ... PANELSPHOTO VOLTAIC ... .. 6 1 81 L 5 WIbx 10 Vfiebx Wxkeb 1n ; vm bx w„rt� b vmr. bx wnrte bx xmm bn s A i r p 0 r t D 1 iLIST OF TREES TO BE TRANSPLANTED OR REMOVED AT SOUTH END OF GARAGE ON 10 PIST 00 5 •4 6 _. 9 4b vm 'bx i 0 r i v Y � V 1 W 55 Cleveland Pear 3 in. 68 Horsechestnut 8 in 80 Austrian Pine 30 ft. 93 White 5 ruce 20 ft. 106 White 5 ruce 22 ft 1 19 White 5 ruce 25 ft. 56 Cleveland Pear 3 in. 69 Prostrate White Pine 4 2 ft. 81 White Ash 4 in. 94 White 5 ruce 20 ft. 107 5erviceberry 2 in. 120 White Ash 8 in. 57 Cleveland Pear 3 in. 69A Perennial Garden G' x 80' 82 White Spruce 15 ft. 95 White Pine 35 ft. 108 5erviceberry 2 in. 58 Japanese Tree Lilac 4 in. White Pine 8 in. 83 5erviceberry 4 in. 9G White 5 ruce 18 ft. 109 5miceberry 2 in. 59 Japanese Tree Lilac 4 in. White Pine 8 in. 84 Austrian Pine 18 ft. 97 White Spruce 18 ft. 1 10 White Spruce 20 ft. White Pine 8 in. Ali Austrian Pine 15 ft. 98 Lilacs 5 6 ft. I I I White Spruce 20 ft. I White 5 ruce 18 ft White Pine 10 in. AC 5erviceberry 4 in 99 Lilacs (G) 6 ft. 1 12 White 5 ruce 20 ft. G2 White 5 ruce 15 ft. 74 Austrian Pine 20 ft. White Pine 15 in. 100 White Ash 8 in. 1 13 White 5 ruce 20 ft. 63 White Spruce 15 ft. Silver Maple 36 in. Austrian Pine 18 in. 101 White S ruce 22 ft. 1 14 White Spruce 20 ft. Serviceber 3 in. >< Silver Maple 22 in. 89 Japanese Tree Lilac 4 in. 102 White 512ruce 22 ft. 1 15 White S ruce 20 ft. G5 Princeton Elm 8 in. 77 White 5 ruce 18 ft. 90 Japanese Tree Lilac 4 in. 103 White 5 ruce 22 ft. 116 White 52ruce 20 ft. 6 Hor5eche5tnut 5 in. 78 Austrian Pine 35 ft. 91 White 5 ruce 20 ft. 104 White 5 ruce 22 ft. 1 17 White 5 ruce 25 ft. 67 Horsechestnut 8 in 79 Austrian Pine 20 ft. 1 92 White Spruce 20 ft. 105 White 5 ruce 22 ft. 1 18 White Spruce 22 ft. BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT S O U T H B U R L I N T O N V E R M O N T PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION 2 LANDSCAPE PLAN -TREES TO BE TRANSPLANTED, STORED, REPLANTED & NEW TREES - SOUTH END + F R E E M A N F R E N C H F R E E M A N A R C H I T E C T S B U R L I N G T O N V E R M O N T M 1 C H A E L C H A R L E S L A W R E N C E A S L A L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T E S S E X J U N C T 1 O N, V E R M O N T I HOYLE, TANNER ASSOCIATES INC. B URLIN G T O N, VERMONT STANTEC SOUTH B U R L I N G T O N, VERMONT z. PLANT LIST AT SOUTH END OF GARAGE KEY I QUAN SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME 51ZE Piab 6 Picea abies White Spruce 7-8 ft. Pist 15 Pinus strobus White Pine 7-8 ft N DATE: JULY, 2009 DWG SCALE. 1 "=60' ��� 0 60' 120' GRAPHIC SCALE DRAWN MCL i.................................... - - - - - �o ce 4 O I —w OO • ® � 18 ; 38 20Q 21� 23g) 25� 2 �, 3��ry 32 �4� © 37e 4b I 6 22� 249) 261. 27� 30© 33 35Q � � 19 40� 4 r rr^ 1 0 42 °° 0 520 . 0 0 �1 c 4I' 51 D A _ ,� 53(g) 54 55k NUR1 H END SOUTH END PARKING GARAGE PARKING GARAGE 2 ADDED LEVELS & GREEN ROOF 1 1 2 ADDED LEVELS & GREEN ROOF ILEI 8 PIAB 10 PIST w 6 � 12 14a5 7 .I N "" 01 15 • C3 nz m ® r 3' 3" Llac .5. .5 6 E 13 1 Red Oak 4' ® 4� I Lla � Japan � win 2�" e^ rAe L u. else, Rm oak • r�r rl n n ! 1 eo cm•, ! A I r p 0 r t D r i V e x ` ` ` ' ` o � � m m F J B U R L I N G T O N I N T E R N A T I O N A L A I R P O R T S O U T H B U R L I N T O N V E R M O N T PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION-2 LANDSCAPE PLAN -TREES TO BE TRANSPLANTED, STORED, REPLANTED & NEW TREES - NORTH END F R E E M A N F R E N C H F R E E M A N A R C H I T E C T S B U R L I N G T O N V E R M O N T M 1 C H A E L C H A R L E S L A W R E N C E A S L A L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T E S S E X J U N C T 1 O N V E R M O N T H O Y LE. TANNER A S S O C I A T E S I N C. B U R L I N G T O N, V E R M O N T STANTEC SOUTH BUR LI NGTON, VERMO NT KEY EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED -I— DEODUOUS TREE TO REMAIN ---- EXISTING FVFRGREEN'IRLL TO BE TRANSPLANTED TO AIRFIELD NURSERY, SPORED & REPLANTED AFTER GARAGE CONSTRUCTED 2 (�)EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE TRANSPLANTED TO AIRFIELD NURSERY, SPORED & REPLANTED AFTER GARAGE CONSTRUCTED 3 aISTING PLANT TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW PLANT OR PLANTS OF EQUAL VALUE SHOWN ON PLANT LIST ® NEW EVERGREEN TREE LIST OF TREES TO BE TRANSPLANTED OR REMOVED AT NORTH END OF GARAGE I I Austrian Pine 12 ft. 2 hackberry 4 in 3 Common Lilac (G) G ft 4 Austrian Pine 12 ft 5 Austrian Pine 9 ft. G Austrian Fine 12 ft 7 Austrian Fine 9 ft 8 Austrian Pine 12 ft. 9 Austrian Pine 10 ft. 10 Austrian Pine 12 ft I I Austrian Pine 15 ft. 12 Austrian Pine 12 13 Norway Maple 5 in. 14 Norway Maple 5 in 5 Craba le 3 in Arborvitae Bed (1 2) 3 in. Blue 5 ruce 20 in. 18 Austrian Pine 10 ft. 19 Austrian Pine 12 ft 20 Austrian Pine 7 ft 21 Cleveland Pear 4 in. 22 Cleveland Pear 4 in. 23 Cleveland Pear 4 in 24 Cleveland Pear 4 in. 25 Cleveland Pear 4 in. 2G Cleveland Pear 4 in 27 Cleveland Pear 4 in 28 Cleveland Pear 4 in 29 Cleveland Pear 4 in. 30 Cleveland Pear 4 in. 31 hickberry 3 in. 32 hackberry 3 in. 33 'lac 3 Ievelad 1nnk334 Cievelana rear in 39 Austnan Pine 10 ft. 40 Austrian Pine 10 ft. 40A Perennial Garden G' x 40' 41 Fat Albert 5 ruce 9 ft 2 5wi5s Stone Pine G ft 43 5wi55 5tone Pine 7 ft. 44 5w155 Stone Pine G ft. 45 Fat Albert 5 ruce 10 ft. 45A Perennial Garden G' x 1 10' 4G Fat Albert Spruce 9 ft. 47 5wi55 Stone Pine 8 ft 48 5wis5 Stone Pine G ft 49 Fat Albert 5 ruce 9 ft, 50 Austrian Pine 12 ft 51 Austrian Pine 12 ft. 52 Austrian Pine 10 ft. 53 Cleveland Pear 3 in 54 Cleveland Pear 3 in. PLANT LIST AT NORTH END OF GARAGE KEY OUAN SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME 51ZE Piab 8 Picea ables Norway 5pruce 7-8 ft Fist 10 Pinus strobus White Pine 7-8 ft No DATE: JULY, 2009 DWG SCALE: 1"=60' L-3 O 60' 120` GRAPHIC SCALE DRAWN MCL r As n to �� ^r �. .. T I• ^T FA a• Ly ♦y �T <1 mr t� ��— m r H It011111 AaRLLLrrams PVHALOIA AaIaDtT]lalYa7o Wham 7rlG7 laps Am alr NaAHn:IaOH W>bVIH rD A0U tmroaawHaann PHOTO VOLTAIC PANELS PHASE I NORTH END PARKING GARAGE 2 ADDED LEVELS & GREEN ROOF 10 PISr �� NDTae�a•K.AlILLLTIaL'nii M7H9LMc �/ AtYCIr aayarp Y Nmfl� l0 p Fl; HC11 A i r p O r t tearaatn aH HonH x o� J a a KEY LIST OF TREES TO BE TRANSPLANTED OR REMOVED AT NORTH END OF GARAGE - PHASE I PLANT LIST AT NORTH END OF GARAGE E0617NG flER13REEN 7AEE TO REMAIN UNDIFrUIM ECUfQ7G DECIDUOUS TREE ToREMAIN UNDET I 2 Auetnan Pine Hxumiv 12 ft. 4 in. 13 14 Norway Maple Norway Maple 5 m 5 in. 25 Cleveland Pear 4 in. 37 Austrian Fine 10 ft. 47 Swm Stone Pine 8 ftr QUAN SCIeNTIPIC NAMC COMMON NAME SIZe �! mNID 2G Cleveland Fear 4 in. 36 AusMan Pine I O ft. 48 5wass Stone Pine G ft. Pub 8 Plw abler N 5 7-0 R. 3 Common Line (G) G ft, 5 Crabs le 3 in. 27 Ckarolwd Fear 1 �OS14JG 6vhACR�•1'IA� 7b Ri 7RAN$RANIIII TO AmFR3D NURSRY• 4 Austrian Pine 1 2 ft. Arborvitae Bed (I 2) 3 n, 28 Cleveland Fear 4 it 4 39 40 Austrian Pine Austrian Fine 10 ft. 10 ft. 48 Fat Albert Spruce 9 ft. Plot 10 Pmus strobus White Fine 7$ ft. 2 k RFCMUOL S AREE 971 NSITA M1vacD �wtE GkRAGErl�IDrOnRIRHDNIA�Y, SR)RFD k RalAN7ID ATI'ER GAMC! 5 G Austrian Pine Austrian Fine 9 ft. 12 ft. 18 plve $prince Austrian Ptne 20 �n. 10 ft. 29 30 Cleveland Fear Cleveland Pear in, 4 ,n. 40A Perennial Garden 6' x 40 50 51 Austrian Pine Austnw Pme 12 ft. COI1S17tUCIID 4 in. 41 Pat Albert Spruce 9 ft, 52 Austrian Pine 10 ft. ,.�:r+ 7 Austrian Pine 9 ft. 19 Austnw Pine 12 ft. 31 MackberrY 3 ,n. 42 5w5s Stone Mine G ft. 53 Cleveland Fear 3 / 7Sl �� �' � F ��'� �'� �Y r1At.1T OR lIAW'IS OF EQUAL VALUE 3i014RJ ON nANrrbT 8 Austrian Pme 12 ft. 20 Austrian Pine 7 ft. 32 Mac berry 3 in, 43 Swiss Stone Pme 7 ft. 54 Cleveland Fear,n 3 ,n. ZONE REQUIRED role CONSfRULIICIIJ CRANES 9 Austrian Pme ( Oft. 2 It 21 22 Cleveland Fear Cleveland Pear 4 in 4 rn. 33 Hackbeny 3 in. 44 5wiss Stone Pine _ IAu5tnan Pine 15 ft. 23 Cleveland Fear 4 ,n. 34 _. 35 Cleveland Pwr Cleveland Fear 3 in. 3 ,n. 45 45A Fat Abort spruce Perennial Garden 10 ft, G' x 110 ® NEW EV8iTRH 12 Au5trw nine 12 ft. 24 Cleveland Fear 4 ,n. 349 Cleveland rear 3 m. 4G Fat Abert 5prvice 9 ft. E3 URLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT S O U T H B U R L I N T O N, V E R M O N T TREE TRANSPLANT & PLANTING PLAN - NORTH END F R E E M A N F R E N C H F R E E M A N A R C H I T E C T S B U R L I N G T O N, V E R M O N T M I C H A E L C H A R L E S L A W R E N C E A S L A L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T E S S E X J U N C T 1 0 N, V E R M O N T HOY LE, TANNER ASSOCIATES INC. BURLIN GTON, VERMONT S T A N T E C SOUTH B U R L I N G T O N, VERMONT DATE: JAN, 2010 DWG SCALE: 1 1'=7a G 70' 140` GRAPHIC SCALE LM6 DRAWN: MC:L grlt'7 LIST OF TREES TO BE TRANSPLANTED OR REMOVED AT SOUTH END OF GARAGE - PHASE 11 PLANT LIST AT SOUTH END OF GARAGE 55 Cleveland Pear 3 in 56 Cleveland Pear 3 in. 57 Cleveland Pear 3 in. 58 Japanese Tree Lilac 4 in 59 Japane5e Tree Lilac 4 in. 60 White 5pruce 20 ft. 61 White Spruce 18 ft. 62 White 5pruce 15 ft. 63 White 5pruce 15 ft, 64 5erviceberry 3 in. 65 Princeton Elm 8 in. G6 Hor5eche5tnut 5 in. 67 Hor5eche5tnut 8 in. 68 Hor5eche5tnut 8 in. 69 Pr05trate White Pine (4) 2 ft. 69A Perennial Garden 6' x 80' White Pine 8 in. it White Pine 8 in. White Pine 8 in. '54� White Pine 10 in 74 Au5trian Pine 20 ft. Silver Maple 36 in. 5dver Maple 22 in. 77 White Spruce 18 ft 78 Au5tnan Pine 35 ft. _ 79 Au5trlan Pine 20 ft. 80 Austrian Pine 30 ft. 81 White Ash 4 in. 82 White 5pruce 15 ft. 83 5erviceberry 4 in. 84 Au5tnan Pine 18 ft RS Austrian Pine 15 ft Ac 5erviceberry 4 in. !I< White Pine 15 in >� Au5tnan Pine 18 in. 89 Japane5e Tree Lilac 4 in. 90 Japanese Tree Lilac 4 in. 91 White 5pruce 20 ft 92 White 519ruce 20 ft. 93 White 5pruce 20 ft 94 White 5pruce 20 ft. 95 White Pine 35 ft. 96 White Spruce 18 ft. 97 White 5pruce 18 ft 98 Lilac5 (5) 6 ft. 99 Lilac5 (6) 6 ft 100 White Ash 8 in. 1 O 1 White 5pruce 22 ft 102 White Spruce 22 ft, 103 White 5pruce 22 ft. 104 White Spruce 22 ft, 105 White 5pruce 22 ft 106 White 5pruce 22 ft. 107 5erviceberry 2 in. 108 5erviceberry 2 in 109 Serviceberry 2 in. 1 1 O White 5pruce 20 ft. I I I White Spruce 20 ft. 1 12 White Spruce 20 ft 1 13 White 5pruce 20 ft. BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT S O U T H B U R L I N T O N, V E R M O N T SKETCH PLAN SHOWING TEMPORARY ACCESS DRIVE FROM AIRPORTDRIVE TO SOUTH END OF PARKING GARAGE M I C H A E L C H A R L E S L A W R E N C E A S L A L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T E S S E X J U N C T 1 O N , V E R M O N T F R E E M A N F R E N C H F R E E M A N A R C H I T E C T S B U R L I N G T O N, V E R M O N T H O Y L E, T A N N E R A S S O C I A T E S I N C B U R L I N G T O N, VERMONT S T A N T E C SOUTH BUIRLINGTO N, VERMONT 114 White Spruce 20 ft. 1 15 White Spruce 20 ft 116 White 5pruce 2n 1 17 White 5pruce 25 ft. 1 18 White Spruce 22 ft 1 19 White 5pruce 25 ft 120 White Ash 8 in. KEY QUAN SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME F1ZE Flab 6 Picea abie5 White Spruce 7-8 ft. Pi5t 1 5 Pm - Strabu5 White Pine 7-8 ft, DATE" APRIL 14, 2010 1 DWG SCALE 1 "=60' 0 60' 120' GRAPHIC SCALE DRAWN MCL L-7 J C� C) C w = — 1 I' ��I Ire�em�reroc�A I�eeMan C —■Ar 41 , I 1 I I ii r 41--- G=A �.....I ili r � b I 0 O 7 O O O Q G O C 0 -- —�='-- -- -- u O,--,i LYI" — I I' — _ IX I �- warm EM WMaow eo N� I 3rd LEVEL PLAN f•Ygtl fdl■T o U O o C� G �` v LIIlYPS S4 4 UI 71D � 5 LE18 ■ � •(J TOTAL t1A PARKING EXPANSION �? C^� ��� �- —•z �—sz J� Yr cz' _Q Q Q Y PROJECT 03 77 117I I BURLINGTON �. I INTERNATIONAL A AIRPORT ' •a uu I I' I _ .IT,`` VR1wOxf E -- I 1 i ■■ILEIBJMIpq I, I j I r -- -� S eoynl I. ' I � _ PROJM A0907.00 T ? ? �r T TLi I i I I I �- ImImil-J11111/5H 11 � sn Aw 1I I I �•' u.i I I r � �; I it � /ILCRfY YT OLIWI Ir II I _ r -Z it 0.19� n 0 nl 0'1 I r U ■ U CJ r xartw so mAwOaw ■wm eo mAIMM —� 3rd i 4th N � PLANS LEVEL 4th LEVEL PLAN c C. r 1 1 o 'o 1 I °" LEVEL NoNmLaim wo C I I I I i q�1 1 1 E NOIIIN 80 DFAMM ■0M eo EWAM" GREEN RC sc . vu• . 1 J WAS PARKING EXPANSION PROJECT 2 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT scum.v.uxmox vu■oxr .m AOl07.00 mania i�� • r-r soot —ilea w ■m,.+ 51h LEVEL i GREEN ROOF PLANS A-102 0. Li F 5 - WEST ELEVATION NC201/ S E. IM' - V-0- Lus. /-2-'\ NQRTN ELEVATION t-3-"\ SOUTH ELEVATION PARKING Ntzv SULz. 1/32. . V-0. \,k:20 SCALE' llw' 1`0' EXPANSION PROJECT 2 -0 -i IF- L-7- L__ -251 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT YFIIMOM EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / 4 FAST ELEVATION _ SCALE. 1/16. - V-0. A-201 PROPOSED NORTH STAIR TOWER EXPANSION BEYOND O •, -(- _— 1 1, I O1Z _ §I_ • \ �- { $30 11 3 }h LEVEL_ <� . - - fh LEVEL 7•• \.� _ Id LEVEL `9 PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS 'P GREEN ROOF PROPOSED G— ARk E EXPANSIOrt ,_� — b nd LEVEL h EXISTING PARKING GARAGE i n 10 LEVEL --------------------- 332.50'(VARIES) __ L__ _ -_ ____-_ _=!Ju AIRPORT DRIVE LANDSCAPE PARKING GARAGE EXTENT OF ENTIRE GARAGE PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APR& If, 2W9 s PROPOSED WIND TURBINE LINE OF EQUIPMENT SCREEN _T.. PROPOSED PROPOSED STAIR TOWER GARG€ EXPANSION P100516T� BEYOND -AND - EXISTING EXISTING SKYWALK ' STAIR TOWER BEYOND �j BEYOND ,'`Y�,; BURLINGTON AIRPORT OVERALL SITE SECTION STUDY y KEY PLAN AIRPORT TERMINAL L' freeman'ifrench freeman Q S, S1 gl *S1 _• . 32 3 s , s Sl sr •S1 " 2•s 32 •5, ° s2 - ° s , S* 32s S, ° 131 y S1 hs� e, ST. °a e31 S1, $1 'SIs •S1 'S1• .S,. 4 51f S, S,• ' 6.1 TYPE S1/SB (LED) DU LEVEL DUAL LEVEL LIGHTING SrNSOR Bela Catalog Number: BED-PWY-T2- -014 LED -B- - - I,nm4 MWI DIwMI-•A• IaW �IS 13' t_.rw�It _I l6• TYPE S2 •x. e.0 3s• TYPE SI nm'-1 wmoi,n t6• - Rn0ur1 //ovsing 1rW a leer L D r Fnnrt/y Iedlmror OPnv M.....g L Folpge OPWem Nw -�. M.rWe+a•••wr pY• m sn RID F`WV T3' DPW 014 ori` LEM DUL nSV OF-Fse (110-]]]V pEK 9111.-IlMlax (1l3/Sf6132f, Eunl cirahiopm)`'" 02 pPt' Univeratl) 13WR G'lT,-S.LFuel (If3l33f w/imepnrv4 snare vaermp,s DUR ORZ (3'] pPe �S_a-t.vael (oll36 cal lnregeead snwr com,ol)" UNwrsq' l7tLl-SSM(arse w/Imegruea neemr eomm0v T Dtz an OI<° LE_D_Ferbrmaoee Geserelles a Spas- InmM aeereret Loses ? R LLM1- tW„i~ r Lena . ry0e 11 OIMF 1It-3TN N1�ttV t�snion�70�.k�ruyeroiun nraeyvnrlgnr 3f6M oM 13 ,1 Mn. aeM1 LED ISN 93W tneel 9rnmv.s, w191T1 BM-S3faBM ..rvw.Rrler,Ynmm LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN — ROOF SGE I'= 20' _ t I 12 s� �2 Si 0 Q , Sir S1 S1 •Sl 1§2 2 '2 °. •s, �1 P ' �1�w TYPE 0 (LED) CUTOFF Wall Forms`WF22 401 Cutoff Facie Surface Mount, Round H1N1 LIGHTNG Type: Approvals: Job: Catalog number: WW22 i I w.r .a Mn1. •. !i I.w wv.AF: I v. • Date. Page: 1 of 3 Specifications 9uf AA6ra a:Ueras, kn mppe.(-D ",r1,, ehlmn,rlrn Uil yunth double side walls. Zinc plated steel nloun(ing pla[e supplied In, mourrbng In sWnd d 3'ur 4'j.rc( l I-, Faro Plate: Die cast lav cg313e �:U.6w. QII aluminum allay L' ven cal and haimn(al da ble nbs eleven tale, ll hemisphere. Whs are d U kr Sealer, 1 1 a wi 11 knr ,Tat ksf steel ca�eu socket head screws. Cutoff Faer 6 Fd ppr h Ik w,d sOW low hali si«ertical I gIIV 10 :. Les Flat le,nperrd SIs, 'i I U Ide - dl IIIL-Ial nap idbUIL "i d IT Ia plan d ­k1l idh .I urw-pK•u Ai -IL - iU.Y gP.skrt. Socket: iNIU): porcelain mediumme base socket rated 4KV. ;Fluorite Plastic G\24q 31Gk24q 4 base socket. No socket roe LED. ' .Lh.x II "-JI by odors;. Ballfist All cnntpn Os xxm(ed I K H1I31 R-- Hit(h CutoA Face ppo .er ncwl' ,dT slat ngt mpelanz Dl Zing to:D: and 10 IF Id Sadie Mount PHI I xnks Fu PMI 110 It. -W , Ir sfc - f ifkd. Fu IPSi)' 7 .wit, w.p-0u,«n o- a pan dOd. F PMI I a,J I IPS34, IL - strp duwll tr ofornxx -s pray dal. ;FluurcxfalD: / •\ 51r:µnLdakxi wiW U,crnal c Ilan. ElcLNU".. "d rulcim-14• outiv l0 'SDSV) inlxrt, iD,•'fAl H/, HIP. Ixrvx.r woo, w01; 4'nrlinK kxrgh•wlunM1 44 F. LID Optical 3yatrn: A Rm l lv n 1 to sminNr' rcuniyurwl In a rPnangukr .r, ro jry I h>µelN. a: a nhr t& Twn RI mxlulrx Iix :mh' vox:.,. Available in",WIUSsn'A'hro" 4pprolc 3SDLR Ernitsers are di dy attached WF22 with LED In I Ifr HIM rnnfr. rkiw. Lm Dnwr. I u 2 A st,.,t wrn.Ut cluuntldr: dri-,(,,,,-. Ra d :u I s waees .,h 15nv-90F)Im 11nN-1mnlm. Availabk• in 12M nr 277V . I e. -4n°F. Sinning rrmpemnllr- All drivers are. tlnd—itnF Labaatuies recgATized. Fn6h: 5y TGI(__ 11nfaet Iwlycxler P._6 coal paint, 2.a mil 'naI Udduxvw, a(prlirxl Dvor 6(arwetl i . �Y 'I.,, '5Q1 hOUr IIquay n,a endranrr NinTrrsrznnard min, are A Nl.,rk, I )ark Hrnme, I�rggM (fray, Smalth (;My , 1'I.mnum, tiil.vr, nrwhiro. Custom c.I- ate avai�T e Flnishig Marrs: II-Liral-FdUI,s .at,, n- pint, Farh Fet m dnisbing imnls,hall n &-dwilli de ri.eurr. Li;TlY disint;uri0n rataing nurnhrf. Gwiff Face CAUTION: Fixwru must be groundW in acoadaxn w,lh rnua);tl. 1ki , m,dkn Areal «IM'tr l auks. railcar In An in ,Pnnu. Q Ixrsmal m}In. a an0 Ing. 1 rn .as lsv6• IPIaI R.vd I-F 1 2W Aa:,tar, MA PAI[M6�In,I.i.htia. Iran .a � K0.i�InN i(Y,'R�-FF�F:�LFF?.i-ir.-FAI:TF.� r � "_ f-zoo xalucanxc lxa-eo-eoxe°oe6mIr 1F Is1FU`1 vram® T¢eaoseli 66 ­.. Maens)6 Emergency 6 Maintenance Access to West 5talr Tower (5) Irv.." VALUES FOR COMPARISON IM MOONLIGHT _ - _.01 TO .1 FOOT-CANDLE PREDAWN .1 TO 1 FOOT-CANULL WINDOWED ROOM ON - 6-B FOOT-CANDLES A CLOUDY DAY BEACH IN BRIGHT Sa NLIGHT 30,000 FOOT -CANOES TAB_E FROM OUTDOOR LIGH'ING MANUAL TOR VLRMONI MUNICIPALmES CONTOUR LEGEND weer I wench I heel Stant" �ntw» r�m(a ROOF LEVEL PHOTOMETRIC EP-101 9 Lob �4 I r r r r A OX?VK ON Kwin F fai' GN ll rail[) I A2 ON KPC@ A OOL I I I I k _ VNCILL WK 'K I I k i • 1 i 0 E 7'MIOIRI. VIM A' I A R ilA161p. TM 7!' . eI1FL w. 40MCM FRECW CIR LAM --LP F. EI11ul W F. Y.OGTM v7m. n. rrmo Gore Ar Mw ' MUM"- f E • It'EGva MrMw /('ma•SLM /Z txI Tw wrnr�R.�aw.+wrr. kt m r swn F-O.Ma" w� ti.�iNrr lMpR 7 Flies Maw LL tr F. /OCK 1ANNIM. 1vw tN IAD-IR F. ow lA6•U► VMORL rvn w - /. wCl( - rM mum 0aw 3/!6 IF'N Movie, fllt Stm IV IW! common rm ne arlow IM a@C a Mw COFIOI= SI[S nE rvtlro -� MI •are Ar Rv1r OOI MIM I I s►AI•Ra tyre r I I I srcln TvK •r TTvvP.SOM�� I EMqM 1, I VrOGUL AWE •r aMoe I I r-�--I---L _l I I I MAO[ I I ' ' 1G �toaiNR•. .Tra I 1 r-1-'{�-1-1 ' 1 I I ----j------� I 1 I 1 aN0! .1_ _1_ r- � I I!! SW AM FOR V OMMI1. WeLL----� L----T---1 ' I I ----r"----� I I 1 I I I 1 I Va MW AM FM M M MA. TOO I --}, ----J-----, �----1_ J IBAY TYPE 'A' s N BAY TYPE 'BI Y TYPE 'C' E� V4'-I'A• IM'•N+4 - VI'•N-p �4 i1�1 1 I r r i A I 7MIIOR6 tYRe •C1' A I k IE I VrkF I SCAUS:� MW 0 4" r r YAMFR6 Me tt' � A I i am we ,Favor � Z arc g i Mw i R oIr COMMON VMoILL ripe •0.1• U4-W F. MUM r. law N K VKWM �• . eaor O VOMFML TIMM •41• L o-v F. NNW w�iitaFsra I�v� ralonwN - . TERMINAL sna we rral• ROADWAY •ur yFc Ar Iw ta•ntlal _ a a a >• a MAK%= :Availtrrc ' i I I - - PROJRCT RUItlLN6TON 1 I I I wlee I I V wd"ft im INIRRNATTONAL r-1— I.•----1i -.1I 007 FFI" WOW"M I aNwc _ . AIRPORT L jQfQl---�. • 1 I Er aUOtf A'AO. IOR EMrFlot. 1fFr L__J1 I 1 i • Y TYPE V BAY TYPE 'E vrw-r wt•.N�• • VraE MUM M oRaN►�tV vlv • ro 00 COLUMN BAY ELEVATIONS A-202 i Mw i R oIr COMMON VMoILL ripe •0.1• U4-W F. MUM r. law N K VKWM �• . eaor O VOMFML TIMM •41• L o-v F. NNW w�iitaFsra I�v� ralonwN - . TERMINAL sna we rral• ROADWAY •ur yFc Ar Iw ta•ntlal _ a a a >• a MAK%= :Availtrrc ' i I I - - PROJRCT RUItlLN6TON 1 I I I wlee I I V wd"ft im INIRRNATTONAL r-1— I.•----1i -.1I 007 FFI" WOW"M I aNwc _ . AIRPORT L jQfQl---�. • 1 I Er aUOtf A'AO. IOR EMrFlot. 1fFr L__J1 I 1 i • Y TYPE V BAY TYPE 'E vrw-r wt•.N�• • VraE MUM M oRaN►�tV vlv • ro 00 COLUMN BAY ELEVATIONS A-202 L CAI tIY'.fIVIY WALL - . P.O. �. Oawrt[ AL~ PAL nul. � t � 1 ' dKA1M t� MIDGE - SOUTH ELEW 4AM vl.- . P-W — ���� di-s.. L CJI I CIR " WALL - rAR 1 1AL CLCYAI IVI7 a &-a-m - IYVR I n GLGYK I IVf7 . r-n eulsw• . r.w .�. TERMINAL ROADWAY AND E7(PANSION ' PROJECT RURUNGTON r INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT >Iw.wr.slal vam" "F �p.�F" mm" W" gramr- ELEVATIONS mr_-- A-203 N 40A erennells in bed were transplanted 34 28 4 19 0 2534 ► f 20 ♦ 23 38 22 into shady area between garage and 20 21 303 gCLA E E F 3„ 1 323 ♦ 36 37 40A • • bridge. 4 C 18 ♦ 24 n 26 27 a 29 a. ry 39 s 37 38 1 a• 10 VVVJJJ®��,��, • 22 ®GIs® O ®12 304, O 33 35� �24 p ear down SA Pia i 0 1 ♦ 29 28 27 18 26 • of a to rgrount utilities - 45 F rt l3 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 31 32 33 35 37 38 39 40 replacedwl t 47 (2) 2" Pears 44sw�to sw' P,^'I •4R Austrian Pines Ornamental Pears 30 34 36 Hackberry Trees Ornamental Pear (2) Austrian Pines (Pyc - planted moved moved O moved was not moved moved on west side P ^_ replanted, replanted - reinstalled - replanted - of garage) 43• sw 7 49 50 respaced to mixed this deciduous flowering tree with along rec path east of garage respaced to accomodate 42 sw e ea^ 5�1 520 allow for growth evergreens to create year-round Interest gas line and growth under existing oak canopy 41 [� on east side of garage (2) not doing well, O spr"ku 51 (Adjusted tree locations based on new left In nursery on Dumont " 54 gas line end to allow for growth) p f 53 reinstalled one tree on west of garage (Insufficient space to be accomodateed on east) PI IASL I NORTH END PARKING GARAGE Owas not moved LEGEND 4A15" Existing tree (numbered) to be moved 13 14 Explanatory Note Norway Maples ®5 Existing replanted tree (numbered) In new location moved reinstalled - on east (their large size Pia New Norway Spruce 8 ® helps reduce apparent scale of garage) ®Pin New Austrian Pine 3 pis New White Pine 10 • ppNew Ornamental Pear 2 4 5 6 7 54C 54D 13 14 "'< 2 2 2Omoved 6 replanted Austrian Pines moved Japanese Tree Lilacs Norway y Maples •� replanted, moved ea crane pad requirement to moved 18 Arborvitae bed '`r respaced to replanted - adlacent rec path reinstalled - on east outlived usefulness - allow for growth smaller scale flowering (their large size removed ornamental tree In foreground helps reduce apparent i view scale of garage) 3 O15 Lilac clump was overand had outlived 54A r�4B 8 9 10 11 12 Crabs d pie move 17 Columnar Blue Spruce O its usefulness. Replaced with evergreen Pines (large) moved n Pines moved not doing well, too large to transplant - removed 3 replaced with (norway spruce) to screen replanted - one at northeast replanted, left In nursery on Dumont evergreen trees employee parking garage to anchor corner respaced to e year-round allow for growth _J 41 -O were not moved N IASF II SOUTH CND PARKING GARAGE •Pin�in ® ® 54A pis* Pie Pia• ,.,pis•• Pls• 9 ® ® ® e* ®Pin ® pis* 4� Pis•0 ® Pis* 36 ®Pia• 2 6 /� ® Pfa• 2 4 5 p `sna ® 54A4 B O Vp c 8 •i 9 i7 0 ' 11AT7, Pla• IS(• ® ®Pia• Q A� ' r • y Aus na" MiE abappl � ® ®Pis• P c • 6 P' ` 54C 4 3• 54D Is* E) Pia• List eed Y Y it a"ias` "p'" �n� 31 O33 16 Are 13(F,f 14• Rcd Oak Pi� , Pic orway 0. 3 it Japan ibc T­ 2*' 48' m • ♦ 4 • Elder 54C 541) 17 R d Oak • I2' • Trec Iv prate Pi Pia f 24. � � Bor•lder A i r o r t D i V e x t 4b L J 4b 4b _ 0 F O 1. I Y B U R L I N G T O N INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT S O U T H B U R L I N T 0 N V E R M O N T DATE JULY 12, 201 1 V'=50' DWG �J C K �„i^\ ///��\ � PLAN SHOWING LOCATION OF NEW AND REPLANTED TREES AT NORTH GARAGE ADDITION M I C H A E L C H A R L E S L A W R E N C E A S L A L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T E S S E X J U N C T 1 O N V E R M O N T CSCALE: O 50, 100, F R E E M A N F R E N C H F R E E M A N A R C H I T E C T S B U R L I N G T O N, V E R M O N T GRAPHIC SCALE v 1 H O Y L E, T A N N E R A S S O C I A T E S I N C B URLINGTO N, VERMONT S T A N T E C SO U T H B U R L I N G T O N, V E R M 0 N T DRAWN MCL EXAMPLE I : SIDEWALK ADJACENT EXAMPLE 2 : SIDEWALK AND CURB SEPARATED SIDEWALK LEVEL SIDEWALK GRASS SIDEWALK TO CURB m GRADE BACK BREAK BY GRASS STRIP BACK OF CURB 5'-O" MAX. • LANDING A B (5' % 5' MIN.) RAMP p RAMP STRIP CURB RAMPS LEVEL LANDING W/ DETECTABLE RAMP WARNING GENERAL NOTES: 5'-0" MAX. • OF TYPE I SIDEWALK TYPE (5' X 5' MIN.) 2 m TYPE 3 1. THE DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THIS STANDARD WILL BE GRADEADHERED CURB SINGLE A TO IN THE DESIGN AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALK BREAK A E7�MMAX. LEVEL A SINGLE WALK -STRAIGHT C GRASS STRIP PERPENDICULAR { p TWO PERPENDICULAR RAMPS. WHERE SIDEWALKS RUN ADJACENT TO ROADWAYS ON STEEP RAM LEVEL A 5 -y ' LANDING I I APPROACH TO PARALLEL 3• MIN. RAMP. RAMP FROM w } RAMPS FROM LEVEL (5% OR GREATER) GRADES, RAMP GRADES WILL BE AS FLAT AS POSSIBLE. 5, E.3% MAX. • , LANDING CURB B �� CURB RAMP LEVEL LANDING N3 •• I I I LANDING (ON LOW SIDE OF DRIVES AND INTERSECTING SIDE STREETS, RAMPS SHALL SLOPE TOWARDS DRIVE OR W/ DETECTABLE TANGENT SECTION SIDE STREET v 2% ) VARIES B GREEN P WARNING GRASS B 2. NOMINAL RAMP DIMENSIONS AND GRADES: DETECTABLE CURB FLUSH STRIP CONCRETE RAMP WIDTH - 4'-0" MINIMUM CURB WARNING STARTING HERE CURB DETECTABLE CURB FLUSH .::.. RAMP SLOPE - 8.3% MAXIMUM WARNING STARTING HERE NOTE: RAMPS MUST INTERSECT CURB FLARE SLOPE - 10% MAXIMUM • EITHER CORNER OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL WILL BE GREATER RAMP LEVEL RAMP CURB AT RIGHT ANGLE. IF THIS CANNOT RAMP CROSS SLOPE - 2.0% MAXIMUM THAN '-O'FROM BACK OF CURB, USE DETECTABLE WARNING ALTERNATE 5 PLACEMENT (WHERE LANDING (WHERE BE ACHIEVED, USE RAMP TYPE 6, REQUIRED) 5'-0" REQUIRED) EXAMPLE 3 SHOWN ON VAOT 3. A LEVEL LANDING GREATER THAN 2 SLOPE IN ANY LEVEL LANDING co MIN � STANDARD DRAWING C-3B. SIDEWALK DIRECTION) SHALL BEE PROVIDED AT THE TOP OF SIDEWALK W/ DETECTABLE C FLAT (OR MAX 24" RAMPS TO ALLOW FOR STOPPING AND MANEUVERING OF WHEELCHAIRS. C WARNING 1 GRADE BREAK 2 0% SLOPE) _ RAMP &3 X• MAX' AUXILIARY MIN. RAMP -- BACK OF (WHERE r CURB 4. LEVEL LANDINGS (NO GREATER THAN 2.0% SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION) AT THE BOTTOM OF PERPENDICULAR RAMPS SHALL BE WHOLLY LEVEL SECTION A -A 8.3% q REQUIRED) 5'-0" CURB RAMP a CONTAINED WITHIN MARKED CROSSWALKS. • 5 B RAMP 8.3% MAX. LANDING 24"" o 44"�"{ w ROADWAY BACK OF -�{ ^"'^• SURFACE MIN FLAT (ORMAX "' 5. DUMMY JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT TRANSITIONS (GRADE CHANGES) AT TOPS AND BOTTOMS OF RAMPS AND FLARES. MIN. CURB R 5'-O" MIN 2.0 %SLOPE) ROADWAY SURFACE GRADE BREAK 8.3 -5.0% MAX. a RAM 8.3% MqX• 8.3 6. VERTICAL DROP-OFF EDGES TO RAMPS WILL NOT BE BUILT UNLESS ALTERNATE PLACEMENT IS THE SAME WITH OR MAX. DETECTABLE ADJACENT ? w MAX. % MAX. THE RAMP ABUTS AN AREA WHICH WILL NOT BE USED BY PEDESTRIANS. WITHOUT THE GRASS STRIP WARNING TO RAMP ROADWAY ADJACENT TO RAMP TO SECTION A -A SURFACE SECTION A -A 7• NO VERTICAL "LIP" OR "CURB REVEAL" WILL BE PROVIDED WHERE EXAMPLE I & 2 DETECTABLE WARNING ALTERNATE PLACEMENT % MAX. THE RAMP ADJOINS THE ROADWAY. BACK OF RAMP 5.0 % MAX..0 ADJACENT 8.3% MAX.AX DETECTABLE WARNING TO RAMP DETECTABLE WARNING 8. AT MARKED CROSSWALKS, THE FULL WIDTH OF THE RAMP OR LANDING LEVEL d CURB LANDING o SECTION B-B CURB LEVEL CURB TRANSITION LANDING TRANSITION CURB CURB CURB CURB CURB R, AMP RAMP SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE PAVEMENT MARKINGS. 24" li ROADWAY TRANSITION RAMP TRANSITION 9. WHERE POSSIBLE. RAMP FLARES SHOULD BE LOCATED MIN. SURFACE OUTSIDE THE DIRECT LINE OF TRAVEL MOST LIKELY TO BE FOLLOWED -5.0% MAX. CURB CURB CURB CURB CURB CURB CURB BY THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED. 8.3%MAMAX• ADJACENT CURB TO RAMP �� SECTION B-B 10. SIGNS. POLES, PLANTERS, MAILBOXES, ETC. SHALL NOT BE LOCATED SECTION C-C SECTION B-B (ALONG FACE OF CURB) WHERE THEY WILL INTERFERE WITH THE USE OF SIDEWALK RAMPS. DETECTABLE WARNING SECTION C-C EXAMPLE I:PAIRED II. WHERE POSSIBLE. SIDEWALK RAMPS SHOULD NOT BE LOCATED WHERE SIDE- SIDEWALK A GRASS WALK STRIP A RAMPS AT u I CORNER. SIDEWALK CURB 24"" BACK SIDEWALK MIN. OF BROOM FINISH ADJACENT USERS MUST CROSS DROP INLET GRATES, MANHOLE COVERS OR OTHER ACCESS LIDS. IF THIS CANNOT AVOIDED THEN GRATE DESIGN AND RAMP CURB RAMPS TYPE W/ DETECTABLE I I RAMP OFFSET FROM WARNINGS DIRECT LINE OF 4'-O" MIN. O7HERENONR 4'-0" MIN. CURB RAMP CURB RAMP TYPE 5 ETECTABLE� R ROADWAY PERPENDICULAR SURFACES FULL WIDTH DETECTABLE (TYPJ OF RAMP WARNING BACK OF DETAILS PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO ADA REQUIREMENTS. O 12.CURB DRAINAGE SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED SO AS TO PRECLUDE THE FLOW OF WATER PAST THE RAMP. PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL TRANSVERSABLE q WARNING "' SURFACE RAMP IN URBAN SIDEWALK B B OBSTACLE A . • I I _ SIDEWALK SETTING - WIDE I CURB I • .... 13. WHEREVER FEASIBLE. TWO SIDEWALK RAMPS ARE RECOMMENDED IN , 2,0% MqX• 8.3 M/ AX. 5.0 %MAX. PREFERENCE TO A SINGLE RAMP. :n- DETECTABLE ADJACENT TO RAMP DETECTABLE WARNING PLACEMENT 14. JOINTS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT SIDEWALK ¢� C L WARNING SECTION A -A 50% MINIMUM TO SQUARE PATTERN, PARALLEL ALIGNMENT SPECIFICATIONS. HOWEVER EXPANSION JOINTS WITHIN THE SIDEWALK • CURB 65% MAXIMUM OF RAMP AREA WILL BE AVOIDED WHEREVER POSSIBLE. CURB TRANSITION CURB RAMP B B A J CURB RAMP RAMP FLARE CURB CURB CURB BASE DIAMETER 1 Q Q Q "j 15. SIDEWALKS THAT ARE LESS THAN 5' WIDE REQUIRE 5' WIDE BY 5' LONG PASSING AREAS (NO GREATER THAN 2.0% CROSS SLOPE)AT INTERVALS CURB ••• ITYPI TRANSITION RAMP TRANSITION ADJACENT SURFACE OF RAMP / NOT TO EXCEED 200 FEET. DETECTABLE WARNING LEVEL LANDING (SEE(^;}/�-?,�,,, DETECTABLE 16. E.O.P. = EDGE OF PAVEMENT SECTION C-C CURB O%MMAX. WARNING NOTE • 6) -- �•b ^^�N• �{ " MIN . 2.4" MAX. CURB RAMP RAMP FLARE--1-0.65" 10 SECTION B-B SECTION C-C 1.4 1.4 " MAX. DETECTABLE WARNING DETAILS j J 17. THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK CURB RAMP STANDARDS DEPICTED HERE MAY NOT BE APPROPRIATE FOR ALL LOCATIONS. FIELD CONDITIONS AT INDIVIDUAL LOCATIONS MAY REQUIRE SPECIFIC DESIGNS. EXAMPLE 2 :SINGLE RAMP ON MIN BASE I DESIGNS MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SHEET SIDEWALKS CORNER RADIUS. DETECTABLE WARNING NOTES: MAXIMUM ENT E N ALTERATION AND HSTRUC EXAMPLE 3 RAMP ON TANGENT I. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL BE PAID FOR BASE AS SPECIFIED IN THE CONTRACT. SPACING WHEN STRUCTE URALLY PRACTICABLE ON NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS REQUIRED BY THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES 10% MAX. SECTION B-B v SECTION 2. CONCRETE ADJACENT TO ALL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL HAVE A BROOM FINISH. ACT ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES. _Jp , ,p 4' % 4' P�Y��' MAX - LANDING 2% CROSS SLOPE 3. THE COLOR OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING SHALL PROVIDE 24 BACK MIN. OF CURB IN ANY DIRECTION SEE GENERAL NOTE 4 4'-0" MIN. A VISUAL CONTRAST TO THE SURROUNDING SURFACE AND SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED 1N THE CONTRACT. 4. WHERE FEASIBLE. TRUNCATED DOMES SHALL BE ALIGNED ON A SQUARE GRID 4'-0" MIN CURB RAMP a 8.331 IN THE PREDOMINANT DIRECTION OF PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL. w ROADWAY C I I 5. WHERE A RAMP OR LEVEL LANDING MEETS A CURB RADIUS. ALIGN THE SURFACE \2_11%j C C A4" EDGE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING AREA PARALLEL TO THE CURB 7.IF ANY PORTION OF THE EDGE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING CLOSEST TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE. TO THE CURB WILL BE GREATER THAN 5' 0" FROM THE BACK OF LURE, 2.OMAMAX 8.3/. CURB \ 6. FOR SURFACE APPLIED TRUNCATED DOME PRODUCTS, A MAXIMUM 0.25" THEN THE PANEL(S) SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE LEVEL LANDING AS MAX. 5.6 % MAX. SECTION A -A ADJACENT CURB RAMP W/ DETECTABLE 48 DETECTABLE VERTICAL CHANGE IN ELEVATION IS ALLOWED. FOR CHANGES IN ELEVATION BETWEEN 0.25" AND 0.50",A BEVEL WITH A MAXIMUM 1:2 SLOPE IS REQUIRED. CLOSE TO PARALLEL TO THE CURB LINE AS POSSIBLE. DETECTABLE WARNIN TO RAMP WARNING MIN. WARNING CHANGES IN ELEVATION GREATER THAN 0.50" MUST BE TREATED AS A RAMP - OTHER STANDARDS REQUIRED: C-2A, 8.3% MAXIMUM SLOPE. C-28, C-3B AND C-10 REVISIONS AND CORRECTIONS APPROVED FEB. 2, 2004 DATE OF ORIGINAL ISSUE SEPT. I, 2004 MINOR REVISIONS TO COMPLY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES Q�ONj AGeHCy O Q �] D Q G� D WITH ADAAG PROGRAM MANAGER MAR. 10, 2008 MINOR REVISIONS TO COMPLY WITH ADA STANDARDS S I D IRW A L K ��pp A M P S 1lvsl DIRECTOR OF PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT 0 R I PNI � FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION STAIR TOWER #2 IN FOREGROUND LINE OF EOUIPMENTSCREEN �! PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS U----_- PROPOSED STAIR TOWER $4 _ 1 EXPANSION I IN BAGKWUND 1 GREEN ROOF I IN FOREGROUND I GREEN ROOF Lw i — I...._ Lt`/eA PR6PQ5EQ _._..— �.. —.,._ PL 'E RA 3T1d N LEVEIGARAGE LEVELSTING � ,--F,(VARIESI al O EXISTING STAIR I SKYWALK aryl I nd LEVEL = z J EXG PARKING GARAGE u IN fnREGgpUND FOREGROUND IvAIIIFSI n 1� < I N — Q Ist LEVEL -------------------------------� — f LANE ENTIRE BURLINGTON AIRPORT OVERALL SITE SECTION STUDY PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIUL 21, 2D0W EVISED JULY 21, 2009 KEY PLAN EXISTING TERMINAL IN FOREGROUND TO roWER .2s'-e' TOWER GROUND LEVEL 331'tl' AIRPORT TERMINAL W/CANOPY TARMAC freeman lfrench ifreeman � r � EXISTING 1 1/2" IRRIGATION LINE m 0 o. a o 340 340 .1 3 EXISTING NEW TEMPORARY PUBLIC EXIT TO SERVE PARKING GARAGE I + o a x PVI 80+00.00 PVI 8 +24 78 32 12 L '= 30 00 FT K = 20 ' ELEV 332.1 ELEV PARKING DURING CONSTRUCTION n GARAGE "PVC CONDUIT rn TOLL BOOTHS (BY OTHERS) TEMP RARY PUBLIC EXIT = + n m PVI 81+59 65 ELEV 329.22 STA 80+59 63 0 0 % FINIS ED GRADE m OFFSET 8 BVR7 a GARAGE PANELS TO BE REMOVED AND I -2 4503X a w STORED FOR REPLACEMENT AFTER 'I; II H"H.^�''�� TEMPORARY PUBLIC EXIT IS CLOSED — FOR DETAILS, SEE ARCHITECTUAL DRAWINGS 3 v RELOCATE FIXTURES FROM EMPLOYEE PARKING LOT 330 L = 4 00 FT -0,9 X 330 CENTER OF DRIVING LANES TO MATCH I I K = 16 OPENINGS BETWEEN COLUMNS AS S 76'43'g3.0"E SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWING SSD = 291 FT DETERMINED BY THE FIELD ENGINEER — I _ FOR ADDITIONAL "' '1' •-I,L INFORMATION ON CONDUIT, m m � FIXTURE, WIRING AND o oag,6 HANDHOLE DETAILS. + n + Ci 1 n m PVI 81 +32 93 ELEV 329 47 +f} w + N m M 12' I o cN o rn r+9p9 �L' ` n n n n n M g. 12' PT Sto 80+79 320 320 96 + --•�� i, �a O N 0 o o o N n n 0 0 0 0 + + + f m m m m m m 1 CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK RAMPS, FLUSH WITH ROAD P R OIC s,. LE1 -- +=y 11 � -- - = SCALE BAR SCALE 79 58'02" AIRPORT DRIVE — + + 20�00 N 19'01'56 9" W 203 00 202 00 T SAWCUT EXISTING "' PAVEMENT iAIRPORT DR CONST 0t POT 202+83 51 = REMOVE EXISTING CURB ARY TEMPORPUBLIC EXIT pOT 81+7409 �/ RESTORE GARAGE PANELS "^I /-• - FOR DETAILS SEE 711 tii _ ARCHITECTUAL DRAWINGS aW I , BD+dO I SITE PLAN SCALE. BAR SCALE I Alignment Name Temp Public Exit I REMOVE PAVEMENT, PLACE NEW TOPSOIL _ STATION NORTHING FASTING AND SEED THIS AREA SHALL BE POD 80 +0000 718051 8539 1469202 0950 RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL GRADE � Delta 97-43'44 06" Right C1 R.d"s m 2300' 12" SUBBASE OF DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE Tangent 26 33' PLACED IN TWO 6" LIFTS Length 39 Ezteraal 11 96' 96' 3" BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT, TYPE III - PC 80+40 73 718012 8485 1469213 8184 PLACED IN TWO 1 1/2" LIFTS PI 80+67 06 717987 6305 1469221 3979 PT 80+79 96 717983 5113 1469195 3897 SLOPE VARIES - - -- POE 81+74 09 717968 7865 1469102 4175 SEE SITE GRADING - PLANS NEW BITUMINOUS ' - N I SIDEWALK ALIGNMENT NAME AIRPORT DRIVE NEW CONCRETE CURB STATION NORTHING FASTING 203+00 202+001 POE 200+00 00 717700 7784 1469194 8701 POE 220+00 46 719591 8855 1468542 5106 TANGENT DIRECTION N 1901,5690" W TANGENT LENGTH 200046' TYPICAL SECTION RESTORATION DETAIL _ SCALE: N TS SCALE BAR SCALE Slantec Consulting Services Inc n lien hr �- Rantec n Copyright Reserved rlU,r Consultants Legend Notes 1 1�c qp Q� Revision Issued nI I d ill I, PerrodSeal CllentlProject BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TEMPORARY PUBLIC EXIT PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION South Budmgton, Vermont Title SITE PLAN, PROFILE, TYPICAL SECTION & RESTORATION PLAN Project No Scale 195310247 AS NOTED Drawing No Sheet Revision SPA I of 4 0 rii I I I S I I 1� I I v 4 TO I , I I � I III I I �t i TO II dl I A j I { 4J1 l 1 I I rx I ----------- ------ ---- - ---- - ------ rg II.RY,'GTp! o A • . -_ tix .s IYD' N E Do NOT t� E — _ FUTURE 80' R 0 W. (OPPOSITE SIDE) — — — _ — — — (OPPOSITE SIDE) — — — — — — �® F ®® C eB F �� I I • 204 Oo 203 00 3" R - -- --- - - fVO • MATCH DOSnNG CONDMONS 3 R \-50" R m + I + FUTURE 80' R 0 W. - I U ~ l • MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS �irW a� PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O4' WHITE LINE O4" YELLOW LINE © 8" YELLOW LINE O24" STOP BAR OLETTER OR SYMBOL OCROSSWALK MARKING W/DIAGONAL LINES 55 Green n Mountain Services Inc 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington VT U S A 05403 T•1 802 864 0223 Ng 802 864 0165 www stontec cam ItallIM Copyright Reserved The Cort—tor shall —ey and be reeponcI far all dimensions 00 NOT scale the drawing —any error or omisclone shad be reported to Stout« w,I delay The Copyrights to oil design. and drawings ore the pry rty of Slantec Reproduction or u.e for any pu,pose —ir llwn lhai oulhonzed by Slantec is forbidden Consultants Legend Notes Revision 9y nppd rrMM Do I Issued ey Appa Y MM Do hiM Name 0l f N—Trl Plan dwg TIM JBL JBL 1004 14 Dwn Chkd Ng, rr MM DD IPerrin -Seal BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TEMPORARY PUBLIC EXIT PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION South Burlington, Vermont Title PAVEMENT MARKING AND TRAFFIC SIGNS Pro{ect No Scale 195310247 1" = 20' Drawing No Sheet Revision PVT-1 2 of 4 0 i NOTE: NOTE: NEW CROSSWALK LOCATIONS SHOWN ABOVE HAVE BEEN PLOTTED ON A NEW CROSSWALK LOCATIONS SHOWN ABOVE HAVE BEEN PLOTTED ON A COPY OF AN APPROVED PROJECT DRAWING AS FOLLOWS: COPY OF AN APPROVED PROJECT DRAWING AS FOLLOWS, "TREE TRANSPLANT k PLANTING PLAN, SHEET L-6" PARKING 'TREE TRANSPLANT h PLANTING PLAN, SHEET L-7" PARKING EXPANSION PROJECT 2, BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, SOUTH EXPANSION PROJECT 2, BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT AS PREPARED BY FREEMAN, FRENCH, FREEMAN BURLINGTON. VERMONT AS PREPARED BY FREEMAN, FRENCH, FREEMAN AND MICHAEL LAWRENCE ASSOCIATES, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, PROJECT AND MICHAEL LAWRENCE ASSOCIATES, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, PROJECT A0907.00, DATED 12-21-09 AND REVISED AS ADDENDUM 1, DATED A0907.00, DATED 12-21-09 AND REVISED AS ADDENDUM 1, DATED 01-29-10. A PORTION OF THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN MASKED AS IT 01-29-10. A PORTION OF THIS DRAWING HAS MASKED A PORTION FALLS BELOW SHEET L-7 AT THE MATCH LINE SHOWN. OF SHEET L-6 AT THE MATCH LINE SHOWN 5'-0' 2" BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SIDEWALK PLACED IN 2 COURSES 1% MIN 2% MAX 6" CRUSHED GRAVEL (MIN.) \ COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL OR //f UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE J NOTES: 1 MINIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF SIDEWALK TO BE 1% MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF SIDEWALK NOT TO EXCEED 2%. 2. MINIMUM WIDTH OF SIDEWALK TO BE 5'-0", EXCLUDING THE WIDTH OF CURBING 3 A MINIMUM CLEARANCE FOR SINGLE WHEELCHAIR PASSAGE AT A POINT SHALL BE 32 INCHES (BYPASSING OBSTACLES LIKE UTILITY POLES OR FIRE HYDRANTS) 4. A MINIMUM CLEARANCE FOR SINGLE WHEELCHAIR PASSAGE AT DRIVEWAY CROSSING SHALL BE 36 INCHES OF CONTINUOUS PASSAGE. BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SIDEWALK Scale. NONE NEW CROSSWALK LOCATION PLAN Sink NONE 5'—O" MIN CONCRETE WALK TOOLED EDGE 1% MIN 27. MAX. in 6" CRUSHED GRAVEL BASE COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL NOTES, OR UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 1. EXPANSION AND DUMMY JOINTS TO BE INSTALLED PER SPECIFICATIONS. 2 MINIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF SIDEWALK TO BE 1%. MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF SIDEWALK NOT TO EXCEED 2% 3. MINIMUM WIDTH OF SIDEWALK TO BE 5'-0". EXCLUDING THE WIDTH OF CURBING. 4. A MINIMUM CLEARANCE FOR SINGLE WHEELCHAIR PASSAGE AT A POINT SHALL BE 32 INCHES. (BYPASSING OBSTACLES LIKE UTILITY POLES OR FIRE HYDRANTS). 5 A MINIMUM CLEARANCE FOR SINGLE WHEELCHAIR PASSAGE AT DRIVEWAY CROSSING SHALL BE 36 INCHES OF CONTINUOUS PASSAGE. MONOLITHIC CONCRETE SIDEWALK Scale. NONE Stantec ConsultingServicesInc 55 Green Mountain Drive Drive South Burlington VT U S A 05403 Tel 802 864 0223 Fax. 802 864 0165 WWW Manlea Cam RantK Copyright Reserved The Contractor shall verify and be respanmble for all cl—n-ns DO NOT scale the drawing Stantec wAhout delay — any errors or om--, shall be sported to The Copynghts to all desgns and drawings are the property of Stantec Reproduohon o authorized by Stantec is se for any purpaee other than that iarmdden Consultants Notes 1. ALL WORK ON THE CROSSWALKS, CURBS, AND DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICES TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD C-3A, SIDEWALK RAMPS, AND ALL OTHER VAOT STANDARD DRAWINGS AS REFERENCED WITHIN STANDARD C-3A. 2 CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS AND OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITY COMPANIES WHEN WORKING IN THE VICINITY OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES. Revision By Appd YY MM DO Issued By Appal rr MM DO File Nome BASE MAP with PDF dwg DDH DMC STANTEC 11-06-30 Dwn Chkd Degn YY MM DO Permit -Seal Client/Project BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PARKING EXPANSION PROJECT 2 South Burlington, Vermont LOCATION PLAN Protect No Scale 195310247 Drawing No, Sheet Revision 1 of 3 0 NOTES. N1. CONTRACTOR TO SAW CUT AND REMOVE EXISTING PAVED SIDEWALK FROM SOUTHERLY END OF SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT t AREA SHOWN TO AN EXISTING SAW CUT ABOUT 23' NORTH OF THE LEVEL LANDING. N2 REGRADE SITE AND REPLACE PAVED SIDEWALK AND CONSTRUCT LANDING MATCHING THE THICKNESS OF THE EXISTING SIDEWALK TO ELEVATIONS SHOWN, BLEND IN TO EXISTNG SDEWALK. I_-=[=-- I - -t= f t NEW ASPHALT PAVED SIDEWALK (SHADED AREA) SEE NOTES N1 ac 1,12� N EXISTING SAW CUT N r -EXISTING GREEN STRIP- ,--'d--- — -'.T— NEW SAW CUT- ,r—EL. 1 EXISTING FACE OF CURB - INSTALL DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE ti CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK RAMP, TYPE 2 EXISTING FACE OF CURB- - EXISTING GREEN STRIP- 'HI-- --_ {IHW EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK - INSTALL DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE NEW 5'-0" WIDE PORTLAND CEMENT CONIC SIDEWALK EXIT CONSTRUCT SID SAMP TYPE_2, , EL 101.28 -- PAINT SPOT ASSUME EL- 100.00,� PAINTED CROSSWALK SEE DETAILS, THIS AIRPORT DRIVE DRAWING I)IiW { I (IIJr WPI h MARYLAND STREET N N r N NORTHERLY CROSSWALK Scale 1"=20' z z w a + ADJUST SPACING (12" — 24") TO AVOID WHEEL PATHS SEE LOCATION PLAN, DRAWING 1, AND INDIVIDUAL SITE PLANS FOR CROSSWALK LOCATIONS ALL BLOCK PATTERN CROSSWALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO WHEEL PATHS BLOCK PATTERN CROSSWALK DETAIL UScale NONE N SIGN W11-2 N Je SIGN W16-7P N NEW SIGN LEGEND* N = NEW R = REMOVE EXISTING SIGN R&R = REMOVE AND RESET EXISTING SIGN FOR SIGN PLACEMENT AND DEFINITIONS, SEE THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS (MUTCD) 2009 EDITION (OR CURRENT EDITION) FOR SIGN DIMENSIONS AND COMPOSITIONS, SEE STANDARD HIGHWAY SIGNS, TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE MUTCD AT SOUTHERLY CROSSWALK, REMOVE THE EXISTING "NO PARKING" SIGN AND RELOCATE THE SAME TO A POINT APPROXIMATELY 100 FT SOUTH OF ITS PRESENT LOCATION 8 PEDISTRIAN CROSSING SIGN Sole NONE —EXISTING PARKING GARAGE - I N N Ae R N O— y T%I -.IINi I'Pl'L 11 WAIF (ti) INSTALL DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE '� p PAINTED CROSSWALK ADJUST CURB RAMP - MAKE CURB SEE DETAILS, THIS SURFACE EQUAL TO PAVEMENT SURFACE DRAWING — INSTALL DETECTABLE CONSTRUCT SIDEWA K RAMP, TYPE 2 WARNING SURFACE AIRPORT DRIVE EXISTING FACE OF CURB- NEW 5'-0" WIDE PORT NO CEMENT EXISTING GREEN STRIP - CONIC. SIDEWALK -EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK^- I ELIZABETH STREET APPROXIMATE LOCATION YIELD N R To EDESTRIAN N Je N R R CENTER CROSSWALK � Sole 1=zo NOTES C1 CONTRACTOR TO SAW CUT AND REMOVE EXISTING PAVED SIDEWALK FROM A POINT 10' BEFORE LEVEL LANDING OUT TO \ THE EXISTING CURB. =—L7 C2. REGRADE SITE AND REPLACE PAVED SIDEWALK AND - CONSTRUCT LANDING MATCHING THE THICKNESS OF THE EXISTING SIDEWALK TO ELEVATIONS SHOWN, BLEND IN TO EXISTING SIDEWALK. N fl I ELL 100 31 N N \ SEE NOTES PASSENGER C1 & C2 TERMINAL 1 I ENTRANCE E(LTUIr Ian rD smrwALK EXISTING FACE OF CURB - EL. 100 21 PAINT SPOT ASSUME EL.=-- _ - - - - - r -- - - - -- - 100 00' INSTALL DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE _� PAINTED CROSSWALK AIRPORT DRIVE DRAWING SEE AILS, THIS CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK RAMP, TYPE 2 INSTALL DETECTABLE EXISTING FACE OF CURB- WARNING SURFACE txl FIN( DIOVIWAY Ill -EXISTING GREEN STRIP - olive rxl5nu�. Dnlvt writ u1 I/NIINC rONCRF TL WAIK N NEW 5'-0" WIDE PORTLAND CEMENT N CONC. SIDEWALK N SOUTHERLY CROSSWALK Sole 1=20' REMOVE EXISTING SIGN RESET 10OFT SOUTH NO ARKIN THIS IDE 0 R&R STREET R&R Slantec Consulting Services Inc 55 Greenn MoMountain Drive South Burlington VT USA 05403 Tel 802 864 0223 Fax 802 864 0165 - - RantK www stantec cam Copyright Reserved The Contractor shall verify and be respons,ble for all dimensions 00 NOT sale the dr—ng Slantec without delay — any errors or omissions shall be reported to The Copyrights to all dws,gns and al—ngs are the property of Stontec Repmducbon or authoraed by Slantec o use for any purpose other than that forbidden Consultants Legend Notes Revision By /yyd YY MM DD Issued By Appd Yf MM DD File No,. BASE MAP dwg DDH JBL STMITEC 11-06-30 Dwn Chkd Dsgn YYMM DD Permll-Seel BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PARKING EXPANSION PROJECT 2 South Burlington, Vermont Title SITE PLANS NEW CROSSWALK LOCATIONS AND DETAILS Project No Scale 195310247 AS NOTED Drawing No Sheet Revision 2 2 of 0