The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVR-92-0000 - Supplemental - 0510 Shelburne RoadSOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the 4eighborhood or district in which the pro ert�%y(/is located; fl I . , ) 09 (2) That because of Ouch physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is thereforproperty; _71X J %y ito nab ; r sonabl� use of t�Dea (3) That such unn es ary hardship has not b en created appellant; CL (4) Thatvthe variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property,. np�r be d t nen L to t ublic w lfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date /,-)— r Appellant Vote: Yes Appeal # No = Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT i Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neig,h4orhood or, district which the property is located; AX (2) That because of such physical c Cumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necess to Ce_nle t e reasonabl use of the1� property .//�` :Z��;/i-(i19�J �//LG� l%l /Jvwtvl► ( 3 ) That such unnece�ry hardship ha�reated b appellant; /-04 et&-2/�ci 14�- 1 (4) That the variance, if authorized, will noe altel- the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property., nor }fie detrimentalo tublic welf�; �,_ (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of ning regulations and of the plan. ��l�l� Appeal # Date Appellant Vote: Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & De'. eiopIll:`ilL AC`i, (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the ei hborhood or dilp^trict in which the �pro ertty� is loca ed;% G (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to nale the reaso�na Je use of the property; �/l/i/�1/f (//P ;i , yz`�� 1 life (3) That such unneces appellant L (4) the That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be /yA/y`-trimenot^aIl to the bq1 /1,+c saelfarq; , �1 , /^ G 7 1-c�-7,1 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zonin regulations And of the plan.��-- i Appeal n Date Vote: Yes No = Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & De,.-elopment Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located: (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore negess_ayy to enable the reasgnablep use of the _ property; --%�- (3) That such unnec ssary hardship has not een mated by t appellant; �� ''y�'��'� !' (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent propeyty, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; r ' — (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification,possible of the zoning regulations and the plan. ` ��,e�c c 1 ��. �'--� �r�r Appeal # Date G/ r/ '�?Z Appellant K11 Vote: Yes No Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical-or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 12" (2) That because of sucif physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 3 t (3) That 9(6ch unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning.regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date �0 — U I?--- Appellanti1 Vote: Yes No = Sign) Use Reverse si e for additional findings SOUTH BtiRLTNGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 1,01- ('S NJT pttY (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the Dre son ble i.ise of the property C U�— --tomy� / C,6 l 1-bUOf (3) That such unnec ssary harfshi as�ngt een Bated by the appellant; �V J��'G-p}- C., 4 I�� (4) (5) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent pro rty, nor be detrimental to the public welfare. (�� a �U &MT A tl eq C HAAA-C/Tbi1 r�.F- ,c tr!i.0�1 WI HO ' d That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date �^ Appellant CR�� C-A• �gl Vote Yes Use Reverse additional I of 6 S q),