HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP-86-0000 - Decision - 0408 Shelburne Road (2)PLANNING COMMISSION
The South Burlington
Tuesday, 16 September
Conference Room, City
Members Present
16 SEPTEMBER 1986
Planning Commission held a meeting on
1986, at 7:30 pm, in the Mini -
Hall, 575 Dorset Street.
Peter Jacob, Chairman; Judith Hurd, William Burgess,
Catherine Peacock, Mary -Barbara Maher, John Dooley, John
Belter
Also Present
Jane Lafleur, City Planner; Paul Farrar, Francis Murray, Mike
Flaherty, George Mona, Molly Lambert - City Council; William
Szymanski, City Manager; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Mike
Donoghue, Free Press; Department; John Larkin, Bob Blanchard,
Lance Llewellyn, Mery Brown, Carl Cobb, Peter Owens, Robert
Perry, Craig Heindel, Steve Crowley, Steve Smith, Bob Jolley,
1. Review Minutes of 2 September 1986
Mrs. Maher moved that the Minutes of 2 September be approved
as written. Mr. Burgess seconded, and the motion passed
unanimously.
2. Consider request of John Larkin for an extension to the
site plan approval for a 6912 sq. ft. office building with
the existing restaurant at 408 Shelburne Road
Mrs. Lafleur said the applicant has the right to one
extension, and Mr. Blanchard said they should be able to get
the building permit within 6 months.
Mrs. Maher moved that the Planning Commission grant a 6 month
extension to John Larkin as per all the stipulations agreed
to and voted on at the Planning Commission meeting of 25
March 1986. Mr. Burgess seconded, and the motion passed
unanimously.
3. Continue sketch plan review of the 2-lot subdivision of
the Semicon property, 1000 Hinesburg Road
Mrs. Lafleur said that all her readings of back Minutes
showed no intention to keep any of the land open except for
the criteria that Act 250 will take care of. There was even
an indication at the City Council meeting on the original
plan that there would be future buildings. Mrs. Lafleur said
she would like several things changed including a 30-foot
driveway and at least a 50 foot easement. The Swift Street
extension should be an 80-foot right of way. All utility
easements to the 80 acre lot should be shown for future
development. Mr. Perry said he was concerned about a 30-foot