The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0370 Shelburne Road88l Existing Parking Analysis (Historic Use) The following breakdown summarizes what we have detennined as the last historic uses and -recognized' parking space requirements for the entire facility as it relates to current regulations: Tenant Space USE Size Parkins? Ratio Rea Spaces Vacant Space Retail 3900 51,1000 20 US Post Office Retail 3007 511000 15 Saigon Restaurant Standard 1850 18/1000 33 VT Color Lab i Saigon Ex. Retail 876 5i 1000 4 Union Jack Deli Short. Order 1410 12/1000 17 Fisher Auto Parts Retail 3600 5/1000 18 Common Area N"A 500 N/A 0 Entry IIall space N/A 759 NA 0 2nd Floor Dead Storage N/A 3470 N.;A 0 21d Floor Furnace Rm. N/A 1090 N/A 0 Common Bathroom N/A 250 N'A 0 Other Hall & Common area N./A 709 N.'.A 0 Total Building Size: 21420 Historic -Use Parking Total: 107* *Important to note the site has atotal of64 spaces; however current regulations recognize atotal of 107 'required spaces' as pertaining to these uses. (This does not include common area, storage and furnace spaces as these spaces have not been dedicated to any particular use). Proposed Parking Analysis For purposes of a Site Plan Application, the following breakdown summarizes the parking space requirements as it relates to the proposed facility and change of use ('shown in bold) for the Vacant Space, Saigon Restaurant and VT Color Lab as follows: 3900 SF Retail Use to Medical Office Ilse 1850 SF Standard Restaurant Use to Short Order Restaurant Use 876 SF Retail Use to Short Order Restaurant Tenant Space USE Size Parkine Ratio Req. Spaces Vacant Space Medical 3900 51/1000 20 US Post Office Retail 3007 5/ 1.000 15 Saigon Restaurant Short Order* 2726 12/1000 33— Union Jack Deli Short. Order 1410 12/1000 17 Fisher Auto Parts Retail 3600 5/1000 18 Common Area N/A 500 N/A 0 Entry Hall space NIA 759 N/A 0 2na Floor Dead Storage N/A 3470 N/A 0 2"dFloor Furnace Rut. N,iA 1090 N/A 0 Common Bathroom N/A 250 NIA 0 Other Hall & Common area NIA 708 N/A 0 Total Building Size: 21420 Proposed Use Parking Total: 103*'"" *Applicant requests change of use of Saigon Restaurant from "Standard" to "Short Order" because the majority of all transactions are "take-out" service. ** Proposal includes combining former 876sf VT' Color Lab space to 1850sf Saigon space. *** Denotes reduction in required spaces as compared to the historic use analysis. NOTE: Site plan prepared by TJ Boyle Associates, and parking analysis information provided by White + Burke T. J. Boyle Associates, LLC °fp Evergreen Investments, LTD landsea a architects . planning consultants jds 03/26/2014 evleetl six snow ataaperm a.nrv+� P _ P g 370 Shelburne Road a� � T 301 college street • budington a vennont • 05401 802 e658 e3555 hltp:/t w gboyle.com non 1" = 30' Site Plan L+— 1 SF ( r r NO,� southbur ington PLANNING & ZONING April 7, 2014 Re: #SP-14-11 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six(6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sinc ely aymond 1. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com RON southburlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP-14- //", office use onl ) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW pAdministrative El Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): Evergreen Investments II LLC; C/O MT. Associates Realtors (Managing Agent) Box 9, Stowe, VT 05677 Phone: 802-253-8518 Fax: 802-253-8534 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): Book 769 Pg 627 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): Evergreen Investments II LLC; C/O MT. Associates Realtors (Managing Agent) Box 9, Stowe, VT 05677 Phone: 802-253-8518 Fax: 802-253-8534 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Stuart or Marion Baraw Box 9, Stowe, VT 05677 Phone: 802-253-8518 Fax: 802-253-8534 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: sbaraw@stowevt.net OR mbaraw@stowevt.net 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 370 Shelburne Road, South Burlington VT 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1540 / 00370 S75 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): 1. Change 3900 SF Vacant Retail Use to Medical Use 2. Change 1850 SF Standard Restaurant Use to Short Order Restaurant Use 3. Change 876 SF Retail Use to Short Order Restaurant (and combined with 1850sf restaurant use) b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Vacant Retail 3900sf, US Post Office 3007sf, Standard Restaurant 1850sf, VT Color Lab / Restaurant Expansion 876sf, Short -Order Deli 1410sf, Retail Auto Parts Store 3600sf; Remaining common area, hall, furnace rm. & storage 6777sf. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Medical 3900sf, US Post Office 3007sf, Short -Order Restaurant 2726sf, Short -Order Deli 1410sf, Retail Auto Parts Store 3600sf; Remaining common area, hallway, furnance room and storage space 6777sf. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 21,420sf total (existing and proposed). e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): N/A (no changes). f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): No Residential units existing or proposed. g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Unknown / Varies when uses change h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Record item: Existing / Historic use parking = 107 (with former uses) Proposed use parking = 103 (with proposed uses) Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: N/A Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC N/A $ N/A N/A a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): N/A (Specialty Retail Designation) 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: N/A 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: N/A 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Fall 2014 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. �� Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 C NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATME OF SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER - PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board ❑/Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: 13/complete , Inco ete Administrative Officer The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 88l L t Existing Parking Analysis (Historic Use) The following breakdown summarizes what we have determined as the last historic uses and 'recognized' parking space requirements for the entire facility as it relates to current regulations: Tenant Space USE Size Parkin Ratio Rea. Spaces Vacant Space Retail 3900 51,1000 20 US Post Office Retail 3007 511000 15 Saigon Restaurant Standard 1850 18i1000 33 VT Color Lab / Saigon Ex. Retail 876 511000 4 Union Jack Deli Short Order 1410 12/1000 17 Fisher Auto Parts Retail 3600 5r1000 18 Common Area N/A 500 N/A 0 Entry Hall space N/A 759 NA 0 Zed Floor Dead Storage N/A 3470 MA 0 2"d floor Furnace Rm. N/A low N/A 0 Common Bathroom N/A 250 N/A 0 Other Hall & Common area NIA 708 N/A 0 Total Building Size: 21420 Historic -Use Parking Total: 107' *Important to note the site has a total of 64 spaces; however current regulations recognize a total of 107 'required spaces' as pertaining to these uses. CI'his does not include common area, storage and rumace spaces as these spaces have not been dedicated to any particular use). Proposed Parking Analysis For proposes of a Site Plan Application, the following breakdowns summarizes the parking space requirements as it relates to the proposed facility and change of use (shown in bold) ['or the Vacant Space, Saigon Restaurant and VT Color Lab its follows: 0 3900 SF Retail 1Lre to Medical Office 1 ce c 1850 SF Standard Restaurant Use to Short Order Restaurant Use 876 SF Rerad Use to Short Order Restaurant Tenant Space USE; Size Parking Ratio Reg. Spaces Vacant Space Medical 3900 5i1000 20 US Post Office Retail 3007 5111000 15 Saigon Restaurant Short Order" 2726 12/1000 33•e Union Jack Deli Short Order 1410 12/1000 17 Fisher Auto Pacts Retail 3600 511000 18 Common Arca N,rA 500 N/A 0 Entry Hall space N/A 759 NIA 0 2"d Floor Mad Storage N/A 3470 NIA 0 2ndFloor Furnace Rm. N/A 1090 N/A 0 Common Bathroom NIA 250 NIA 0 Other Hall & Common area N/A 708 N/A 0 Total Building Size: 21420 Proposed Ilse Parking Total: 103aa" *Applicant requests change of use of Saigon Restaurant from ':Standard" to "Short Order" because the majority of all transactions are "take-out" service. *" Proposal includes combining former 876sf VT Color Lab space to 1850sf Saigon space. *" Denotes reduction in required spaces as compared to the historic us C E I NOTE: APR 0 4 2014 -- — — -- Site plan prepared by TJ Boyle Associates, and parkin analysis information provided by White + Burke City Of So, Budingto T. J. Boyle Associates, LLC Evergreen Investments, LTD landscape architects a planning consultants Jds �3/2ti/2014 pro: ,,,,,, 370 Shelburne Road T� 301 college street a budington a vent nt a 05401 802 e658 e3555 WJAvw W-yle.cam t' = 30' Site P18I1 +r 1 S1 white + burke REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT ADVISORS March 26, 2014 Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Belair: RECEIVED APR 0 4 20111 City of So. Burlington Our applicant Evergreen Investments, seeks site plan application approval for 370 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT. for interior use changes. I. Project Understanding History of the 370 Shelburne Road property, available records and plans, and conversations have provided an understanding of the following: There are currently 64 total available on -site spaces. The property meets a "Specialty Retail " designation. We understand this designation does not require the property to undergo additional traffic generation review; however does require the applicant to review the number of parking spaces per use. We understand parking was last reviewed in YR2000 under different regulations when number of parking spaces was determined by the number of seats. An analysis of these spaces (under the current regulations) includes 107 space allowance (as defined below). The majority of transactions at Saigon Restaurant is "take-out" / short-order use. Change of uses require Site Plan Application and review of the following: 0 3900 SF Retail Use to Medical Use 0 1850 SF Standard Restaurant Use to Short Order Restaurant Use 0 876 SF Retail Use to Short Order Restaurant 40 College St., Suite 100 PO Box 1007 Burlington, VT 05402-1007 P: 802.862.1225 F: 802,862.3601 www.whiteandhurke.com II. Existing Parking Analysis (Historic Use) The following breakdown summarizes what we have determined as the last historic uses and `recognized' parking space requirements for the entire facility as it relates to current regulations: Tenant Space USE Size Parking Ratio Req. Spaces Vacant Space Retail 3900 511000 20 US Post Office Retail 3007 511000 15 Saigon Restaurant Standard 1850 18/1000 33 VT Color Lab / Saigon Ex. Retail 876 511000 4 Union Jack Deli Short Order 1410 12/1000 17 Fisher Auto Parts Retail 3600 511000 18 Common Area N/A 500 N/A 0 Entry Hall space N/A 759 N/A 0 2nd Floor Dead Storage N/A 3470 N/A 0 2nd Floor Furnace Rm. N/A 1090 N/A 0 Common Bathroom N/A 250 N/A 0 Other Hall & Common area N/A 708 N/A 0 Total Building Size: 21420 Historic -Use Parking Total: 107* *Important to note the site has a total of 64 spaces; however current regulations recognize a total of 107 `required spaces' as the historic allowance for these uses. (This does not include common area, storage and furnace spaces as these spaces have not been dedicated to any particular use). Page 2 of 4 111. Proposed Parking Analysis For purposes of a Site Plan Application, the following breakdown summarizes the parking space requirements as it relates to the proposed facility and change of use (shown in bold) for the Vacant Space, Saigon Restaurant and VT Color Lab as follows: 0 3900 SF Retail Use to Medical Office Use 0 1850 SF Standard Restaurant Use to Short Order Restaurant Use 0 876 SF Retail Use to Short Order Restaurant Tenant Space USE Size Parking Ratio Reg. Spaces Vacant Space Medical 3900 5/1000 20 US Post Office Retail 3007 511000 15 Saigon Restaurant Short Order* 2726 12/1000 33** Union Jack Deli Short Order 1410 12/ 1000 17 Fisher Auto Parts Retail 3600 511000 18 Common Area N/A 500 N/A 0 Entry Hall space N/A 759 N/A 0 2nd Floor Dead Storage N/A 3470 N/A 0 2nd Floor Furnace Rm. N/A 1090 N/A 0 Common Bathroom N/A 250 N/A 0 Other Hall & Common area N/A 708 N/A 0 Total Building Size: 21420 Proposed Use Parking Total: 103*** *Applicant requests change of use of Saigon Restaurant from "Standard" to "Short Order" because the majority of all transactions are "take-out" service. ** Proposal includes combining former 876SF VT Color Lab space to 1850SF Saigon space. * * * Denotes reduction in required spaces as compared to the historic use analysis. Page 3 of 4 d F IV. Summary Although the total number of spaces on site equal 64, we request staff to recognize 107 spaces as the baseline allowance for their review because the property uses and required parking spaces were grandfathered long before current development regulations and today's parking requirements. As described in the proposed analysis above, the change in use within the vacant space from retail to medical results in the same number of required parking spaces (from 511000 to 511000). In addition, our request to change Saigon's use from "Standard" to "Short Order" results in less required parking for the restaurant (from 18/1000 to 12/1000). The proposed analysis indicates a total parking requirement of 103 spaces. This is 4 spaces below the 107 historic -use parking baseline allowance. We acknowledge the need for a shared parking analysis in the event that any future changes in uses require an amount of parking beyond the 107 baseline allowance. Inference suggests many of the required spaces are high above realistic needs. Examples include 33 spaces for a take-out Chinese restaurant, 15 spaces for the post office, or 18 spaces for Fisher Auto Parts who operates under the retail designation but wholesales much of their products. V. Conclusion In conclusion, we simply request an Administrative Site Plan Review of the following: 1. Approval of 3900 SF Retail Use to Medical Office Use 2. Approval of 1850 SF Standard Restaurant Use to Short Order Restaurant Use 3. Approval of 876 SF Retail Use to Short Order Restaurant In addition we ask staff to recognize the following for city records: 4. Existing / Historic use parking allowance = 107 (with former uses) 5. Proposed use parking allowance = 103 (with proposed use changes described) Last, applicant acknowledges the following (future) requirement for city record: 6. Applicant to provide shared parking analysis in the event any future changes in use require an amount of parking higher than the 107 baseline allowance. Page 4 of 4 PLANT LIST Hickok and Boardman - South BEdinaton )ENDRONS TO REMAIN I `o° p 1 i 1 I I I I I ♦ I •\ I \ \ jr- � I � J TREE — PRESERVATION II j SNOW V� -� STORAG� I � ^Uurao CNJCIVICIY I 1 V SNUM Oty. Code Scientific Name Common Name Size So- Notes 11 JBH JUNIPERUs NONzontal•'B..-0., Bar Harbor Juniper ta" k3 Cont. 1 $ 495.00 C16-FOOT DUMPSTER FENCE AND SCREENING SLATS SLAT COLOR: BROWN N.T.S. YW«Vm mg,t S m No m Fm 11YVAEmEOLiMFiMMmI 5Law -T m ergm saED «vsE 4.. -WRWEre AS PER DLOEN': mAVPIS fSG1RO r RAOMD PRODUCT: 13a-7-IG(SF,SG) F1flAiB11 mDESGBPDON: CHALLENGER BIKE RACK ] BIKE. SURFACE OR IN GROUND MOUNT DATE: a-5-03 \ .a. TLC l SEVEN BIKE RACK DETAIL NOTE: N.T.S. BLACK POWDER COAT FINISH Tree Preservation Details LEGEND EXISTING SURVEY TREE TO REMAIN ON SITE X EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED ODECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE OORNAMENTALIFRUIT TREE SHRUBS SHRUB MASSING Q BOULDER RELOCATED r TREE PROTECTION FENCING L — J SKI TO BE POSTED So O.C.. EXTEND POST (SEE SIGN [rtIAA OF TREE 3) SIEFl OR RVOO POST HIGHLY NSIBIE fUGEKG ITEc'. FENCE NAX IivEROeLL al)-UNE OP voss —T SE ESTJ.AN. Y ORANGE NING TRENCH e- WRE BOTTEI c - Anww SCALE - Art SCARF NTS INST NO a roTx NI DETAIL A DETAIL 8: PROTECTIVE FENCE NOS No Es . PRIOR TO TRENCHING CONTRACTOR SHALL NDdFY ALL UTUTIES LOOAnGNs. GN11RS PENCE SERM:S AS A TREE PR(— OENCE L1'. R. EXACT LOCATON o' TRENOI SHALL SE STAKED OO RAGGED PRIOR TO T—0M'ES of PETENnON AREA SHALL BE STAKED TP eRCHMG. Pit. ro NSTAWNG FFnCE. 3 naNCN — SE Nu--I'LLED MUM REMON:O NADN: SOL OR OTHER HNNLY ORGANIC SEL C 3. ROOT OAMAGE $HILL BE AIVDED. E. TH ROOTS SIi0U1D SE CUT MUM A SAW ON LOPPEFS TO MAKE A 1. PROTECTN: SIGNAGE IS REOURED (SEE DETA. C). cIN jA SMOOWT. NOT TERN ON RPFED. fSM 9KALL SE MANTANED nIROUGNOUT EcTIEK. 'U- To SECURE p FEKOE POSTS MUST BE A1FD To A OEPM G MAN 1/3 G THE MIN. 11" —s(r TREE PROTECTION AREA Z IlllmwNOrira•R°�« Nm 7 SCALE . NTS DETAIL C 1. NOTES: TTAGNMENTS R. SIGNS SHOULD 3. SIGNS SHOULD MULL BE EIN- 1. NXO INAIRv THE ALMS. S. SIGNS SIKALD G 1�O _ ALL G SIGNS TO TEES IS PR -AS TC. BE MADE OF N AIN IN P. IEN BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED. PENALDES REMONAN G SIGNS TO ROO15 w1FN PUENC POSTS FOR T ROOTS SE POSTED SO' O.C. AND MNN RO' CONANOENO (f EACN FEND ro SE sUcnGN Pwsa+Hn, T. J. Boyle Associates, LLC ie eRe landscape architects • planning consultants law 12-01-09 ReNRbne lO DWI, Do-,o.09 °„ Hickok &, Boardman ReNdortR to woo05ea roOXN wm - Jeo 01-19-10 1 301 college street • burin ton • Vermont a 05401 802 •658 .3555 II,IDUAww. no L-1 SB AdJdumPMAo—Xr91XXenXXX W-JSC asnz-,o 9 a rIe.GDm ,�, � .uM 1"=20' Planting Plan - South Burlington ZONING PERMIT CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS City of Burlington, Vermont Department of Planning and Zoning Application Date: 6/2/2009 Appeal Expiration Date: 8/12/2009 Project Location: 346 SHELBURNE STREET District: NAC Owner: HICKOK & BOARDMAN PLACE LLC Address: P O BOX 1335 BURLINGTON, VT 05402 Ward: 6 Telephone: Tax ID: 058-2-013-000 Project Description: Commercial / Site Imp/Landscaping/Parking/Fence Site inprovement including parking, lighting, landscaping, stormwater management, and new access point over adjoining property. Existing Use: SERVICES - OFFICE Proposed Use: SERVICES - OFFICE Construction Cost: $600,000 Lot Size (Sq Ft): 136,850 Net New Square Feet: 0.00 Net New # of Housing Units: 0 Existing % Lot Coverage: 51.30 Existing # of Parking Spaces: 186 Proposed % Lot Coverage: 62.90 Proposed # of Parking Spaces: 186 Net New % Lot Coverage: 11.60 1 Required # of Parking Spaces: 186 Zoning Permit #: 09-888CA Decision Type: Development Review Board Level of Review: 2 Decision: Approved w/ Pre -Release Conditions -See Require e or ALDecision Date: July Project File #: 09-888CA Zoning Administrator An interested person may appeal a decision of the Development Review Board to the Vermont Environmental Court until 4 pm on August 12, 2009. Fee Type Amount Paid in Full Balance Due: $2,700.00 Application Fee: $1,317.00 Yes ® rt 7 Date Paid: Development Review Fee: $2,700.00 No Impact Fee: Not Applicable Check # Permit Received by: Date: RSN: 183442 149 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401-8415 An 100 WE southlbunington PLANNING & ZONING January 28, 2010 Eric Farrell PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: Administrative Site Plan Review Dear Mr. Farrell: Fncingarl pl:'aSe find copies �f the Findi igS Of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Administrative Officer on January 27, 2010 (effective 1/27/10). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, ina Beagley Planning and Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Site Plan Application Permit Number SP- - U q APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #): 3. A PLICANT (Name, mailin a dress, phone and fax #): J*1C-Cpj ,� QJ01t4+7V 4. CONTACT PERSON (pers9n who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): C-., � ezc ; l�' ),L 113 3T UPt" st.' OQ 406k a ,) sly 1- 30 `,r l 'L r � ISI . -( 21 R101- 30V 3 a. Contact e-mail address: CO t;Ol�,� 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 9`70 -SWE . 0" izw t�: Rd. 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION General project description (explain what you want approval for): 1P 11119 t A 1 Site Plan Application 0 b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): 1 d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): f. Number of residenti I units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): jF g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non - office employees):)/y4. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): /A) Sc) &9L — iS )4- = / I ZV 9 piecah alo r /, 3 q b LOT COVERAGE VTotal Parcel Size: r-14 0 t; A- Gq-Ft.- PXv0fe, ,Ct ' j . S'4v a. Building: Existing % / Proposed % / sq. ft. sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 2f7oq Z % / sq. ft. Proposed&,'70 % / sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % sq. ft. i,g- r Jov ;3uOIL, 2 i Site Plan Application d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) I * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ .-, b. Landscaping: $ 5zt c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): , czW'S `oq- 6" ►Z r? C�I t t -4-- f-y-1 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC ,AJI)'I- -- % a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14. ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) IVIA 3 Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line e)(4-,ba PRINT NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board J Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: L Complete ❑ Incomplete ///v //16 of Planning & Zoning or Designee 5 "A HICKOK & BOARDMAN PLACE, LLC 346 Shelburne Road - Burlington MEMO TO: Ray Belair FROM: Eric Farrell DATE: January 20, 2010 RE: 370 Shelburne Road I have enclosed the following materials, in connection with our request for administrative approval of certain modifications we proposed to the above referenced property: • Application For Site Plan Review • Application Fee in the amount of $88.00 The following drawings reflect our request (one at 11x17 and three at 2406): • Boundary Adjustment Between Hickok & Boardman Place, LLC and Evergreen Investments, Ltd. (Drawing Number PL 1, dated June 1, 2009, last revised 1/19/10) • Hickok & Boardman, Parking_ Improvements, Existing Conditions Site Plan (Drawing No. C1.0, dated Feb. 2009) • Hickok & Boardman, Parking Improvements, Phase H Plan (Drawing Number C3, dated Oct. 2009, last revised 1/19/10) • Hickok & Boardman, Planting Plan - South Burlington (Sheet No. L-1SB, dated 12/1/09, last revised 1/19/10) Mailing Address: PO Box 1335 • Burlington • Vermont • 0-5402 The planned improvements involve the following: • Widening the existing curb cut on Shelburne Road and lowering the profile to eliminate the "bottoming out" that presently occurs when cars enter or exit the site, which restricts the amount of cars that can be accommodated in one traffic light cycle. • Adjusting the boundary line with the abutting property to the north, resulting in a net gain of .135 acres (actually in Burlington - no gain in South Burlington). • Net addition of 10 parking spaces in South Burlington along the north side of the building. The total number of parking spaces on site, including in Burlington and South Burlington remains unchanged at 64. • Overall lot coverage in South Burlington is reduced from 87.92% to 86.70%, thereby reducing the degree of non-compliance. • Minimal new plantings in the landscaped island at the northwest corn of the building (estimated cost: $500.00). • One additional catch basin added along access way to abutting property. • Miscellaneous work in Burlington to complete the connection to the abutting property to the north. The estimated cost of the improvements is $50,000. Please let me know, if you require any additional information in order to process this application. Attachments Mailing Address: PO Box 1335 • Burlington • Vermont • 0-5402 Department of Planning and Zoning David White, AICP, Director 149 Church Street Ken Lerner, Assistant Director Burlington, VT 05401 Sandrine Thibault, AICP, Comprehensive Planner Jay Appleton, GIS Manager Telephone:(802) 865-7188 Scott Gustin, AICP, Senior Planner (802) 865-7195 (FAX) Mary O'Neil, Associate Planner (802) 865-7142 (TTY) Nic Anderson, Zoning Clerk Elsie Tillotson, Department Secretary Burlington Development Review Board Minutes/Findings of Fact July 13, 2009 In RE: 09-888CA; 346 Shelburne St. (Ward 6, NAC) (Tax Lot No. 058-2-013-000) Owner/Applicant: Hickok & Boardman Place, LLC Request: Certificate of appropriateness review of site improvements including parking, lighting, landscaping, stormwater management, and new access point over adjoining property Members Present: Austin Hart Glenn Jarrett Michael Long Eleanor Briggs Kenworthy Kevin Worden Paul Henninge Evidence Presented: The Board examined the materials submitted in support of this request. I. FINDINGS Background Information: The applicant is seeking approval for extensive site renovations. The entire parking area is to be reconfigured and reconstructed with a new access to the Flynn Avenue/Shelburne Street traffic light by way of the adjacent property. The number of parking spaces will remain unchanged. All new site lighting is proposed, as is a new stormwater management system. A boundary line adjustment with the neighboring property to the south is also proposed. Because two properties are involved in this proposal, a second permit application has been filed (10-0021CA). Previous zoning actions for this property are noted below. • 6/9/08, Approval for awning and signage • 4/9/08, Approval to enclose 6 h floor patio • 9/28/06, Approval to resurface existing landing and stairs • 3/29/06, Approval to install wireless internet equipment • 2/15/02, Approval to replace existing chiller pad with larger chiller pad • 4/15/97, Approval to replace existing shed with new shed • 8/24/89, Approval to install satellite communications equipment • 8/24/89, Approval for exterior signage • 1/26/89, Denial of exterior signage EJ • 2/25/88, Approval to construct 3 additional stories and expand parking • 3/23/87, Approval for partial change in use from office to diet center • 1/23/86, Denial to construct 3 additional stories and expand parking • 11/6/73, Approval of sign variance • 1971, Approval of office tower • 7/9/68, Approval to construct new home southeast of the existing Lund Home and permit access to Glen Road Article 4: Maps & Districts Sec. 4.4.2, Neighborhood Mixed Use District. (a) Purpose (1) NA The NAC zone is intended to provide convenient neighborhood and city-wide oriented goods and services and employment opportunities. In this case, the existing office tower is a significant place of employment and will remain unchanged. (Affirmative finding) (b) Dimensional Standards & Density The existing FAR will remain unchanged. Lot coverage will increase to 62.9% of the office tower property. Coverage on the adjacent property to the south will increase to 69.1 %. In both cases, coverage remains below the maximum permissible 80%. Existing building setbacks and height will remain unchanged. The new dumpster enclosure complies with the required minimum 15' rear yard setback along a residential zone boundary. (Affirmative finding) (c) Permitted & Conditional Uses The existing office use will remain unchanged. (Affirmative finding) (d) District Specific Regulations Not applicable. Article 5: Citywide General Regulations Sec. 5.2.3, Lot Coverage Requirements See Sec. 4.4.2 (b) above. Sec. 5.2.4, Buildable Area Calculation Not applicable. Sec. 5.2.5, Setbacks See Sec. 4.4.2 (b) above. Sec. 5.2.6, Building Height Limits See Sec. 4.4.2 (b) above. Sec. 5.2.7, Density and Intensity of Development Calculations See Sec. 4.4.2 (b) above. 09-888CA Minutes/Findings of Fact pg. 2 of 6 Sec. 5.5.1, Nuisance Regulations Nothing in the proposal appears to constitute a nuisance under this criterion. (Affirmative finding) Sec. 5.5.2, Outdoor Lighting Outdoor illumination of the parking and circulation areas will be completely redone. A comprehensive photometric analysis and fixture cutsheets have been provided. All mounting heights are at or below 24', the maximum permissible height. Maximum illumination levels are below the 4.0 footcandle maximum allowed, and the uniformity ratios are below the 20:1 allowable. All fixtures are cutoff and utilize metal halide bulbs. (Affirmative finding) Sec. 5.5.3, Stormwater and Erosion Control Existing stormwater infrastructure appears to consist of several catch basins which direct runoff into the city system. As part of this project, an underground infiltration apparatus will be installed. No catch basins are depicted on the proposed conditions plan. Presumably this is an oversight and needs to be corrected. Details about the capacity of infiltration and other.aspects of the stormwater system are subject to review by the Department of Public Works under Chapter 26: Wastewater, Stormwater, & Pollution Control. An erosion control plan has been provided and contains a mix of standard items such as silt fence, stabilization fabric, and inlet protections. A small project erosion control form needs to be completed to accompany this plan. The Conservation Board reviewed this project July 6, 2009 and recommended approval subject to the standard conditions under this Section. (Affirmative finding as conditioned) Article 6: Development Review Standards: Part 1, Land Division Design Standards Not applicable. Part 2, Site Plan Design Standards Sec. 6.2.2, Review Standards (a) Protection of important natural features There are no important natural features onsite. The property consists of a relatively large office tower, parking, and lawn. Some landscaping alterations are proposed as noted later in these findings. (Affirmative finding) (b) Topographical alterations As part of the reconstruction and reconfiguration of the parking area, some grading and fill will occur, primarily south and west of the existing building. This work is necessary to provide a level parking area as it extends westward. Nothing excessive or unwarranted is proposed insofar as topographical alterations are concerned. (Affirmative finding) (c) Protection of important public views There are no designated view sheds from or through the property. (Affirmative finding) (d) Protection of important cultural resources The property has no known archaeological resources. The building was constructed in 1971. (Affirmative finding) 09-888CA Minutes/Findings of Fact pg. 3 of 6 (e) Supporting the use of alternative energy This project will not impact the use of alternative energy in any way. (Affirmative finding) 69 Brownfield sites Not applicable. (g) Provide for nature's events See Sec. 5.5.3. (h) Building location and orientation Building location and orientation will remain unchanged. (Affirmative finding) (i) Vehicular access A key component to this project is the establishment of access to the Flynn Avenue / Shelburne Street traffic light. A new driveway will be constructed off the western end of the reconfigured parking area and will line up with the aforementioned intersection. As articulated in the level of service analysis that has been provided, this new signalized access will greatly improve the safety and efficiency of vehicles leaving the property and heading south (left) on Shelburne Street. Review and approval of the new access is subject to review and approval by the Department of Public Works. (Affirmative finding as conditioned) (j) Pedestrian access Pedestrian access throughout the site will be improved with the installation of new walkways. (Affirmative finding) (k) Accessibility for the handicapped Handicap parking will be provided and will be placed as a group just to the north of the existing building. (Affirmative finding) (1) Parking and circulation Parking will remain to the sides of, and behind, the building. The parking area will remain in segmented components to the north, east, and south of the building with 6 landscaping islands within the largest parking area to the south. A group of existing crabapple trees will be relocated in a row along the western edge of the parking area to provide screening. A row of "crusader hawthorn" trees is located along the southern boundary of the parking area, which provides further screening. The proposed screening is a fair start but needs enhancement, particularly given the expansion of asphalt towards Shelburne Street. In addition, this criterion requires that 30% of the parking area needs to be shaded with trees. There is no indication that this requirement has been met. Additional trees along the periphery of the parking areas and within the parking lot islands could likely provide additional screening and meet the 30% shading requirement. (Affirmative finding as conditioned) (m) Landscaping and fences Proposed landscaping focuses on parking lot shading and screening as noted above. (n) Public plazas and open space No public plaza or open space is included in this proposal. 09-888CA Minutes/Findings of Fact pg. 4 of 6 (o) Outdoor lighting See Sec. 5.5.2. (p) Integrate infrastructure into the design No new utility lines or ground -mounted mechanical equipment are included in this proposal. A new trash and equipment enclosures is proposed and will be located to the rear of the office tower. The building is fully enclosed and provides acceptable screening. (Affirmative finding) Part 3, Architectural Design Standards Sec. 6.3.2, Review Standards Not applicable. II. MINUTES The meeting minutes will be distributed separately upon review and approval by the Development Review Board. III. MOTION Motion: Glenn Jarrett I move that the Board grant certificate of appropriateness approval for site improvements including parking, lighting, landscaping, stormwater management, and a new access point over the adjoining property, located at 346 Shelburne Street in the NAC zone in accordance with Articles 4, 5, and 6. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to release of the zoning permit, the applicant shall receive written approval of the erosion control plan and stormwater system alterations from the Department of Public Works per Chapter 26 and Sec. 5.5.3 of the CDO. 2. Prior to release of the zoning permit, the applicant shall receive written approval of the proposed Flynn Avenue/Shelburne Street intersection access. 3. Prior to release of the zoning permit, revised plans depicting additional parking lot screening and achieving 30% shading shall be submitted and is subject to staff review and approval. 4. The Applicant/Property Owner is responsible for obtaining all necessary Zoning Permits and Building Permits through the Department of Public Works as well as other permit(s) as may be required, and shall meet all energy efficiency codes as required. 5. Standard permit conditions 1-18. Seconded: Kevin Worden Vote: 6-0-0, motion carried Please note that an interested person may appeal a decision of the Development Review Board to the Vermont Environmental Court. (Zoning Ordinance Article 17, Section 17.1.7, Appeals of Development Review Board Decisions: An interested person may appeal a decision of the Development Review Board to the Vermont Environmental Court. The appeal shall be taken in such a manner as the supreme court may by rule provide for appeals 09-888CA Minutes/Findings of Fact pg. 5 of 6 from state agencies governed by Sections 801 through 816 of Title 3). The Court rules may require that such an appeal be commenced within Thirty (30) days of the Board's decision. 09-888CA Minutes/Findings of Fact pg. 6 of 6 RISIG.. BFSOuRcr, SYSTFMS GR0t)P. INC. MEMORANDUM To: Ray Belair, South Burlington Administrative Officer From: Mark Smith, PE Subject: Hickok and Boardman Property — New Access Impacts at the Flynn Ave/Shelburne St Traffic Signal Date: 22 January 2010 Copy to: Eric Farrell, Owner/Broker, Farrell Real Estate This memorandum is provided as a supplement and update to the previous memo regarding Hickok and Boardman Site Impacts on Level of Service, date April 28, 2009. That report outlines and summarizes an analysis of the expected change in traffic, and resulting impacts, due to a new driveway connection from 246 Shelburne St. to 370 Shelburne St., which thereby accesses the signal at Flynn & Shelburne. Since this previous memo, the City of Burlington has allowed the installation of a protected left turn phase for the westbound / east approach (the shopping center/post office property). In addition the City has decided to keep the southern crosswalk and protected pedestrian phase, rather than allow the concurrent phase assumed in the attached memo. This new analysis provides a comparison of expected delay and queuing with these new changes to the existing condition. The attached Congestion Summary tables show that by providing an advance green (similar to those now in operation at VT116 and Williston Rd, or the Windjammer/Double Tree Driveways) along with the additional traffic from the Hickok and Boardman site, overall delay in the PM Peak is slightly increased by about 1 second, maintaining an acceptable overall Level of Service of C. Expected 95th percentile queues for the westbound approach are slightly reduced, and less than 3 vehicles long (70 feet). In conclusion, the new geometry proposed for this approach will accommodate the expected queuing and provided more definition to the queuing area, as well as allow smoother operation by lowering the approach area to address current grade deficiencies. No operational or safety issues are expected with the proposed changes. END OF MEMO 60 Lake Street, Unit 1E Burlington, Vermont 05401 802.3J93.011a - FAX 80;7a383,0122 ww'w.rc-��trltz.ccarn Flynne Shelburne 1 of 2 1/22/2010 Congestion Summary Compare Protected WB Left Option HCM LOS SUMMARY - PM Peak Hour Movement EBLT EBR WBTL WBR NBL NBTR SBL SBTR Existing Condition - No -build w/ ped phase v/c Ratio 0.54 0.17 0.39 0.03 0.51 0.47 0.2 0.79 Delay (s) 36 31.4 33.4 30.5 31.4 7.9 17.4 25.3 Level of Service D C C C C A B C Approach Delay (s) 32.7 32.3 11 25 Approach LOS C C B C Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 20.3 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 Build - w/ advance green WB & ped phase Lane Group EBLT EBR WBL WBTR NBL NBTR SBL SBTR v/c Ratio 0.55 0.13 0.24 0.09 0.61 0.55 0.21 0.81 Delay (s) 36.4 25 25.3 24.4 17.2 13 18.8 27.5 Level of Service D C C C B B B C Approach Delay (s) 28.1 24.8 13.6 27.2 Approach LOS C C B C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 21.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 *change lane configuration to create exclusive left Flynne Shelburne 2 of 2 1/22/2010 Congestion Summary Compare Protected WB Left Option QUEUE SUMMARY - PM Peak Hour Existing Condition - No -build w/ ped phase Lane Group EBLT Lane Group Flow (vph) 99 Queue Length 50th (ft) 47 Queue Length 95th (ft) #118 EBR WBTL WBR NBL NBTR SBL SBTR 263 69 43 158 1063 40 1131 0 32 0 71 83 11 213 94 80 33 #244 313 46 #507 Build - With advance green WB w/ ped phase Lane Group EBLT EBR WBL' WBTR NBL Lane Group Flow (vph) 99 263 73 70 1 f Queue Length 50th (ft) 46 0 26 9 Queue Length 95th (ft) #155 82 70 50 #1 i I # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. *change lane configuration to create exclusive left NBTR SBL SBTR 1062 40 1103 143 12 231 356 51 #552 Queues PM No -build 2: Flynn Ave & Shelburne Road/US 7 __* -",,* 4% t �* II i CAA °group EBT EBIR WBT WBR ' NBL NBT SBL° SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 99 263 69 43 158 1063 40 1131 We Ratio 0.54 0.61 0.39 0.18 0.51 „ 0.43 0.17 0.70 Control Delay 44.1 11.1 38.1 12.1 41.3 7.8 18.0 22.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.1 11.1 38.1 12.1 41.3 7.8 18.0 22.1 Queue length 50th (ft)- 47 0 32 0 71 83 11 213 Queue Length 95th (ft) #118 94 80 33 #244 313 46 #507 Internal Link Dist (ft) 599 206 76 346 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 50 75 125 Base Capacity (vph) 194 444 190 254 307 2453 229 1611 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.59 0.36 0.17 0.51 0.43 0.17 0.70 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 1/22/2010 Synchro 7 - Report V:IProjectffarrell-H&B Site-070891Analysis\SynchrolSynchro-Jan 2010\2009 PM NB w ped.syn Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM No -build 2: Flynn Ave & Shelburne Road/US 7 mown& EBL EBT <EBIR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL `' SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T r +t ? tT. I tT Volume (vph) 65 34 263 45 24 43 158 1062 1 40 1075 56 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time, (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1804 1583 1804 1583 1770 3539 1770 3513 Fit Permitted 0.76 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.27 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1416 1583 1385 1583 1770 3539 501 3513 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 65 34 263 45 24 43 158 1062 1 40 1075 56 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 229 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 99 34 0 69 6 158 1063 0 40 1127 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm custom Perm Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 1 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 13.9 51.5 32.6 32.6 Effective Green, g (s) 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 13.9 51.5 32.6 32.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0,13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.17 0.64 0.41 0.41 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 182 204 178 204 308 2278 204 1432 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.30 c0.32 v/s Ratio Perm c0.07 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.17 0.39 0.03 0.51 0.47 0.20 0.79 Uniform Delay, dl 32.6 31.0 32.0 30.5 30.0 7.3 15.3 20.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.3 0.4 1.4 0.1 1.5 0.7 2.1 4.6 Delay (s) 36.0 31.4 33.4 30.5 31.4 7.9 17.4 25.3 Level of Service D C C C C A B C Approach Delay (s) 32.7 32.3 11.0 25.0 Approach LOS C C B C Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 20.3 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 23.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group 1/22/2010 Synchro 7 - Report V.\Projects\Farrell-H&B Site-07089\Analysis\Synchro\Synchro-Jan 2010009 PM NB w ped.syn Page 2 Queues PM - Build - adv green 2: Flynn Ave & Shelburne Road/US 7 + I Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL- NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 99 263 73 70 158 1062 40 1103 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.41 0.21 0.17 0.58 0.50 0.18 0.71 Control Delay 48.0 5.6 23.2 12.8 22.4 12.4 21.7 24.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 48.0 5.6 23.2 12.8 22.4 12.4 21.7 24.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 46 0 26 9 31 143 12 231 Queue Length 95th (ft) #155 82 70 50 #170 356 51 #552 Internal Link Dist (ft) 599 206 76 346 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 75 125 Base Capacity (vph) 180 639 344 439 272 2119 222 1558 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio " 0.55 0.41 0.21 0.16 0.58 0.50 0.18 0.71 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 1/2212010 Synchro 7 - Report V:IProjectslFarrell-H&B Site-070891AnalysislSynchrolSynchro-Jan 2010\2009 PM B w ped & adv green.syn Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM - Build - adv green 2: Flynn Ave & Shelburne Road/US 7 Movement :.EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR `` NBL NBT NBR ` SBL 5BT SBR Lane Configurations +1 ?f T+ tT. I TT Volume (vph) 65 34 263 73 24 46 158 1057 5 40 1048 55 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1804 1583 1770 1679 1770 3537 1770 3513 Flt Permitted 0.76 1.00 0.58 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.27 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1415 1583 1079 1679 208 3537 502 3513 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 65 34 263 73 24 46 158 1057 5 40 1048 55 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 204 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 99 59 73 35 0 158 1062 0 40 1099 0 Turn Type Perm pm+ov pm+pt pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 4 5 10 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.2 17.8 18.3 18.3 43.5 43.5 30.9 30.9 Effective Green, g (s) 10.2 17.8 18.3 18.3 43.5 43.5 30.9 30.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.54 0.54 0.39 0.39 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.5 3.0 3.0 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 180 451 300 384 261 1923 194 1357 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.02 0.02 0.06 c0.30 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm c0.07 0.02 0.04 0.27 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.13 0.24 0.09 0.61 0.55 0.21 0.81 Uniform Delay, dl 32.7 24.9 24.8 24.3 13.8 11.9 16.4 21.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.7 0.1 0.4 0.1 3.4 1.2 2.4 5.6 Delay (s) 36.4 25.0 25.3 24.4 17.2 13.0 18.8 27.5 Level of Service D C C C B B B C Approach Delay (s) 28.1 24.8 13.6 27.2 Approach LOS C C B C Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 21.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group 1/22/2010 Synchro 7 - Report V:IProjectslFarrell-H&B Site-070891AnalysislSynchrolSynchro-Jan 2010\2009 PM B w ped & adv green.syn Page 2 } w"ON R kJ iNC. .A� RESOURCE SY*S'1"1',Ms (,&YfTul', INC, MEMORANDUM To: Eric Farrell From: Mark Smith, PE and Beth Isler, PE Subject: Hickok and Boardman Site Impacts on Level of Service Date: 28 April 2009 RSG was asked to assess the impact of a connection between the Hickok and Boardman (H&B) site at 346 Shelburne Street and the shopping plaza at 370 Shelburne Street. This connection would allow cars at the H&B site to enter/exit at 1) the existing site driveway, 2) the 370 Shelburne driveway at the Shelburne -Flynn traffic signal, or 3) the 370 Shelburne driveway on Proctor Avenue. Figure 1 shows these access points. The assessment of this access configuration is based on analyses of previously considered site expansion options. This memorandum summarizes the impacts that this configuration is expected to have on PM peak hour traffic at the adjacent intersections: 1) Shelburne -existing site driveway; 2) Shelburne -Flynn; and 3) Shelburne -Proctor. 60 Lake Street, Suite 1E • Burlington, Vermont 05401 FtL 802.383.0118 w E- X'802.383.0122. www.rsginc.com Project Memorandum 4/28/2009 Figure 1: Project Area ASSUMPTIONS Et SCENARIOS Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 2 In previous analysesl, the AM peak hour showed less congestion than the PM peak hour, and was not as impacted by the proposed changes, which were more significant at that time. Therefore, this assessment considers only the PM peak hour. PM peak hour traffic counts at the three proposed site accesses were conducted on 31 March 2009. The traffic volumes used in this analysis are attached to this memorandum. Traffic signal timings currently used at the Flynn -Shelburne intersection were obtained from Dave Garen at the City DPW on 23 April 2O09. 1 Reference memo to C. Duncan, Burlington DPW, 1-31-08. Project Memorandum 4/28/2009 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 3 Since this project would provide additional entrance and exit options for the site, assumptions had to be made as to how the access would be used. Figure 2 describes the entrance/exit patterns assumed for this assessment. Figure 2: Directional Distribution Assumptions for vehicles accessing the H&B Site US 7/Shelburne Road 80 80% r 28 25% 20 20% C N 50 % 0% 25 US 7/Shelburne Road v Q Q w Vehicles entering site via 5BL Vehicles entering site via NBR Vehicles exiting site via WBR Vehicles exiting site via WBL Project Memorandum 4/28/2009 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 4 Using this pattern, we distributed the site traffic on to the roadway network. The impact on traffic patterns - that is, subtracting the existing site traffics and then redistributing it according to the assumptions above - is shown in Figure I There will not be any new trips generated by the site. Figure 3: Site Trip Redistribution PM Peak Hour US 7/Shelburne Road d '�- -3 t h a ,�- -30 h t !` w 3 -6 -1 -27 0 0 .N 3 Er c � < 0 0 a c 0 28 y 0 1% t r' 0 -5 4 370 Shelburne 1 0 0 2 1 L Al 4 0 2 0 c 0 t 0 Q `o iR 0 t1 2 � o. US 7/Shelburne Road Hotel Access Three scenarios were considered for this assessment: 1 See attached. Project Memorandum 4/28/2009 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 5 1. 2009 PM peak hour existing conditions: with exclusive ped phase 2. 2009 PM peak hour existing conditions: ped phase isn't called 3. 2014 PM peak hour with intersection improvements and the new connection As described in the 4 March 2009 memo entitled "Suggested Improvements at Shelburne Street/Flynn Avenue Traffic Signal," the improvements included in Scenario 3 are: 1. Switch the lane designation on the 370 Shelburne Rd (east) approach from THRU + LEFT (shared) and RIGHT (exclusive) to LEFT (exclusive) and THRU + RIGHT (shared). 2. Move the bus shelter and US 7 crosswalk from the south approach to the north approach. This change allows for a concurrent pedestrian signal phase, increasing overall signal capacity. 3. Improve the grading of the west approach so that cars can proceed at a more normal pace, improving the ability of the signal to process cars. 4. Retime the signal phase splits to optimize them for all approaches. RESULTS Synchro traffic analysis software and the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology were used to assess Level of Service (LOS) and queuing at the three study intersections. Results are shown in Table 1. Complete Synchro reports for each analysis are also attached. Project Memorandum 4/28/2009 Table 1: LOS Results Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 6 Intersection 2009 Existing 2014 Bulld US 7/Shelburne Street at Existln Drivewa unsi nalized Westbound Left F 71.6 n/a 53 Left F 53.9 n/a 12 RI ht A 9.9 n/a 2 Ri ht B 10.6 n/o 2 US 7/Shelburne Street & FI nn Ave - 370 Shelburne (signalized) w/exclusive ed phase* edphase isn't called Concurrent ped phase and intersection im rovements— OVERALL-> C 20.3 8 18.9 B 13.1 Northbound Left C 31.4 71 #244 C 27.7 70 142 A 7.3 10 54 Thru+Thru-Ri ht A 7.9 83 313 A 93 207 A 5.1 93 191 Southbound Left B 17.4 11 46 12 45 B 10.1 9 36 Thru+Thru-RI ht C 25.3 213 #507 133 #499 B 13.3 180 345 Eastbound Left -Through D 36.0 47 #118 EN 47 96 C 33.5 47 99Ri ht C 31.4 094 36 128 C 308 6 94 Westbound Left-Throu h C 33.4 32 80 32 71 Exclusive Left C 325 34 78 Exclusive Ri ht C 30.5 0 33 C . 0 29 Through -Right C 30.1 11 50 US 7/Shelburne Street & Proctor Ave unsi nalized Westbound Left -Right C 13.2 n/o 9 Left -Right D 25.5 n/a 10 avg. 95th % avg. 95th % avg. 95th Delay queue queue Delay queue queue Delay queue queue A roach Lane Grou LOS s v ft ft LOS (s/v ft ft Lane Notes: 'Ped phase Interval timing provided by Dave Garen - City DPW. Assumes 15 peds / hour ."Assumes moving the Fed crossing to the north approach allows concurrent phasing due to reduced conflicts and that the westbound shared left/through and exclusive right lane geometry at Flynn is switched to an exclusive left turn lane with a shared through/right lane. # Volume exceeds capacity; queues may be longer. Volume exceeds capacity; queue is theoretically infinite. CONCLUSIONS The delay and queuing expected at the existing entrance (the H&B site) will be significantly reduced due to the additional access provided to the Flynn Avenue intersection. The enhancements proposed at the Shelburne -Flynn intersection mitigate the expected additional traffic allowed by this new entrance by improving LOS, delay and queuing. Further, these intersection improvements increase safety by moving the existing Shelburne St crosswalk - thereby reducing the potential for conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles turning right on red. r''I>S�. _.RCF ATTACHMENT A 2009 PM Peak Hour No Build Volumes Count Date: 31 March 2009 DHV Adjustment: 0.95 Annual Adjustment: 1.00 Total Adjustment: 1.00 US 7/Shelburne Road 1139 3 ♦ 1, y m R- 16 m y �- 41 ` h 1 1155 8 56 1075 40 65 43 34 -► +- 24 m 263 -y ,�- 45 0 t II 158 1062 1 370 Shelburne 1364 19 4 0 28 1 L d i 1. K- 19 50 -0 R. 18 � 79 19 a 4 0 0 r t r� 1202 110 0 0 0 US 7/Shelburne Road Hotel Access 60 Lake Street, Suite 1E ■ Burt ingttln; Vermont 05401 rct 802.383.01.18 ■ FAX 802.3810122 a www.rsginc.com ATTACHMENT B: Synchro / HCM traffic analysis output 2009 Existing Conditions with Pedestrian Phase at Flynn Ave & Shelburne HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Existing Driveway & Shelburne Road/US 7 4/28/2009 'r I- t /". ,► 1 Movement'' '-" .-- WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations I if ti. 4f Volume (veh/h) 41 16 1155 8 3 1139 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 41 16 1155 8 3 1139 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 426 pX, platoon unblocked 0.85 0.85 0.85 vC, conflicting volume 1734 582 1163 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1504 140 828 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 57 98 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 94 746 676 Direction, Lane # WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 NB 2` SB'1 SB 2 Volume Total 41 16 770 393 383 759 Volume Left 41 0 0 0 3 0 Volume Right 0 16 0 8 0 0 cSH 94 746 1700 1700 676 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.43 0.02 0.45 0.23 0.00 0.45 Queue Length 95th (ft) 53 2 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 71.6 9.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Lane LOS F A A Approach Delay (s) 54.3 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS F Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 60 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 7 - Report V:IProjects\Farrell-H&B SitelAnalysislSynchro\Synchro-April 2009\2009 PM NB w ped.syn Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Flynn Ave & Shelburne Road/US 7 4/28/2009 * Movement ""' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR' NBL" NBT NBIR ' SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations *T r +t if tT. I t T. Volume (vph) 65 34 263 45 24 43 158 1062 1 40 1075 56 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) _ 1804 1583 1804 1583 1770 3539 1770 3513 Flt Permitted 0.76 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.27 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1416 1583 1385 1583 1770 3539 501 3513 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 65 34 263 45 24 43 158 1062 1 40 1075 56 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 229 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 99 34 0 69 6 158 1063 0 40 1127 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm custom Perm Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 1 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 13.9 51.5 32.6 32.6 Effective Green, g (s) 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 13.9 51.5 32.6 32.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.17 0.64 0.41 0.41 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 10 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 182 204 178 204 308 2278 204 1432 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.30 c0.32 v/s Ratio Perm c0.07 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.17 0.39 0.03 0.51 0.47 0.20 0.79 Uniform Delay, dl 32.6 31.0 32.0 30.5 30.0 7.3 15.3 20.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.3 0.4 1.4 0.1 1.5 0.7 2.1 4.6 Delay (s) 36.0 31.4 33.4 30.5 31.4 7.9 17.4 25.3 Level of Service D C C C C A B C Approach Delay (s) 32.7 32.3 11.0 25.0 Approach LOS C C B C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 20.3 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 23.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 7 - Report V:1ProjectslFarrell-H&B SitelAnalysislSynchrolSynchro-April 2009\2009 PM NB w ped.syn Page 3 Queues 2: Flynn Ave & Shelburne Road/US 7 4/28/2009 -"* ~ A,. 4� t II i Lane Group EBT EBIR " 1NST rt WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 99 263 69 43 158 1063 40 1131 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.61 0.39 0.18 0.51 0.43 0.17 0.70 Control Delay 44.1 11.1 38.1 12.1 41.3 7.8 18.0 22.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.1 11.1 38.1 12.1 41.3 7.8 18.0 22.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 47 0 32 0 71 83 11 213 Queue Length 95th (ft) #118 94 80 33 #244 313 46 #507 Internal Link Dist (ft) 599 206 76 346 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 50 75 125 Base Capacity (vph) 194 444 190 254 307 2453 229 1611 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.59 0.36 0.17 0.51 0.43 0.17 0.70 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 7 - Report V:1Projects\Farrell-H&B Site\Analysis\Synchro\Synchro-April 2009/2009 PM NB w ped.syn Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Proctor Avenue & Shelburne Road/US 7 4/28/2009 f- 1 /* '* 1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ►j+r fl� 4f Volume (veh/h) 4 19 1202 110 19 1364 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 4 19 1202 110 19 1364 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 156 pX, platoon unblocked 0.72 vC, conflicting volume 1977 656 1312 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1578 656 1312 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 94 95 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 69 408 523 Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total 23 801 511 474 909 Volume Left 4 0 0 19 0 Volume Right 19 0 110 0 0 cSH 221 1700 1700 523 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.47 0.30 0.04 0.53 Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 0 0 3 0 Control Delay (s) 23.2 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 Lane LOS C A Approach Delay (s) 23.2 0.0 0.4 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.1 % ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 60 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 7 - Report V:1Projectffarrell-H&B SitelAnalysislSynchrolSynchro-April 2009\2009 PM NB w ped.syn Page 4 ATTACHMENT C: Synchro / HCM traffic analysis output 2009 Existing Conditions without Pedestrian Phase at Flynn Ave & Shelburne HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Flynn Ave & Shelburne Road/US 7 4/28/2009 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL ` WBT " WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + 4 rr tT. Vi tT+ Volume (vph) 65 34 263 45 24 43 158 1062 1 40 1075 56 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1804 1583 1804 1583 1770 3539 1770 3513 Fit Permitted 0.76 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.27 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1416 1583 1385 1583 1770 3539 501 3513 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 65 34 263 45 24 43 158 1062 1 40 1075 56 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 159 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 99 104 0 69 6 158 1063 0 40 1127 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm custom Perm Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 1 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 17.3 56.3 33.0 33.0 Effective Green, g (s) 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 17.3 56.3 33.0 33.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.22 0.70 0.41 0.41 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 207 232 203 232 383 2491 207 1449 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.30 c0.32 v/s Ratio Perm c0.07 0.07 0.05 0.00 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.45 0.34 0.03 0.41 0.43 0.19 0.78 Uniform Delay, dl 31.3 31.2 30.7 29.3 27.0 5.0 15.0 20.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 1.4 1.0 0.0 0.7 0.5 2.1 4.3 Delay (s) 33.1 32.6 31.7 29.3 27.7 5.6 17.1 24.6 Level of Service C C C C C A B C Approach Delay (s) 32.7 30.8 8.4 24.4 Approach LOS C C A C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 18.9 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 7 - Report V:1ProjectslFarrell-H&B SitelAnalysislSynchrolSynchro-April 2009\2009 PM NB w-o ped.syn Page 3 Queues Z Flynn Ave & Shelburne Road/US 7 4/28/2009 I,- 4\ t �* Lane Group EBT EBIR WBT ` WBR NBIL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 99 263 69 43 158 1063 40 1131 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.67 0.34 0.16 0.41 0.43 0.19 0.78 Control Delay 38.3 19.6 34.0 10.3 31.6 6.1 19.4 25.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 38.3 19.6 34.0 10.3 31.6 6.1 19.4 25.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 47 36 32 0 70 93 12 233 Queue Length 95th (ft) 96 128 71 29 142 207 45 #499 Internal Link Dist (ft) 599 206 76 346 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 50 75 125 Base Capacity (vph) 549 727 537 640 382 2492 207 1457 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.36 0.13 0.07 0.41 0.43 0.19 0.78 Intersection Summary '" _._r.. .,.... Wiz, .__... ....,.... # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 7 - Report V:1Projectffarrell-H&B Site\Analysis\Synchro\Synchro-April 2009\2009 PM NB w-o ped.syn Page 2 ATTACHMENT D: Synchro / HCM traffic analysis output 2014 Build Conditions HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Existing Driveway & Shelburne Road/US 7 4/28/2009 1- 1` t* Movement '` , BL WBR NBT NBIR SBL SBT Lane Configurations I r fl� Volume (veh/h) 12 13 1178 2 2 1162 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 12 13 1178 2 2 1162 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 426 pX, platoon unblocked 0.88 0.88 0.88 vC, conflicting volume 1764 590 1180 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1594 258 930 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s)' ` 3.5 3.3 21 p0 queue free % 86 98 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 86 651 643 Volume Total 12 13 785 395 389 775 Volume Left 12 0 0 0 2 0 Volume Right 0 13 0 2 0 0 cSH 86 651 1700 1700 643 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.14 0.02 0.46- 0.23 0.00 0.46 Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 2 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 53.9 10.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Lane LOS F B A Approach Delay (s) 31.4 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS D Intersection Sumrraj Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 60 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 7 - Report V:1Projects\Farrell-H&B Site\Analysis\SynchrolSynchro-April 2009/2014 PM B.syn Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Flynn Ave & Shelburne Road/US 7 4/28/2009 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T 1W T. TT4. tt. Volume (vph) 66 34 268 74 24 47 161 1076 5 40 1070 56 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1803 1583 1770 1678 1770 3537 1770 3513 Fit Permitted 0.76 1.00 0.69 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.26 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1412 1583 1290 1678 301 3537 492 3513 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 66 34 268 74 24 47 161 1076 5 40 1070 56 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 218 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 100 50 74 31 0 161 1081 0 40 1122 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 57.0 57.0 43.3 43.3 Effective Green, g (s) 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 57.5 57.5 43.8 43.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.72 0.72 0.55 0.55 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 203 228 185 241 367 2542 269 1923 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.04 c0.31 c0.32 v/s Ratio Perm c0.07 0.03 0.06 0.27 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.22 0.40 0.13 0.44 0.43 0.15 0.58 Uniform Delay, d1 31.6 30.3 31.1 29.9 6.5 4.6 8.9 12.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 0.5 1.4 0.2 0.8 0.5 1.2 1.3 Delay (s) 33.5 30.8 32.5 30.1 7.3 5.1 10.1 13.3 Level of Service C C C C A A B B Approach Delay (s) 31.5 31.4 5.4 13.2 Approach LOS C C A B Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 13.1 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.1 % ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 7 - Report V:IProjectslFarrell-H&B Site\Analysis\Synchro\Synchro-April 200912014 PM B.syn Page 3 Queues 2: Flynn Ave & Shelburne Road/US 7 4/28/2009 -*,* 41- A\ Lao6 Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT " Lane Group Flow (vph) 100 268 74 71 161 1081 40 1126 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.60 0.40 0.25 0.44 0.43 0.15 0.58 Control Delay 39.1 11.1 36.3 15.7 8.0 5.6 12.7 14.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 39.1 11.1 36.3 15.7 8.0 5.6 12.7 14.4 Queue Length50th (ft) 47 6 34 11 20 93 9 180 Queue Length 95th (ft) 99 94 78 50 54 191 36 345 Internal Link Dist (ft) 599 206 76 346 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 75 125 Base Capacity (vph) 291 529 266 383 392 2542 270 1930 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.51 0.28 0.19 0.41 0.43 0.15 0.58 Intersection Summary 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 7 - Report V:1Projects\Farrell-H&B Site\Analysis\Synchro\Synchro-April 2009\2014 PM B.syn Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Proctor Avenue & Shelburne Road/US 7 4/28/2009 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Y f fi Tf Volume (veh/h) 4 19 1223 114 19 1392 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 4 19 1223 114 19 1392 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 156 pX, platoon unblocked 0.79 vC, conflicting volume 2014 668 1337 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1747 668 1337 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 93 95 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 58 400 512 Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total 23 815 522 483 928 Volume Left 4 0 0 19 0 Volume Right 19 0 114 0 0 cSH 199 1700 1700 512 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.48 0.31 0.04 0.55 Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 0 0 3 0 Control Delay (s) 25.5 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 Lane LOS D A Approach Delay (s) 25.5 0.0 0.4 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 60 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 7 - Report V:1Projects\Farrell-H&B Site\AnalysislSynchro\Synchro-April 2009\2014 PM B.syn Page 4 GRID NORTH \ \\ VT Coordinate 76 0i6h'Road System 1983 NORTH o I (Note 2) 308 Shelburne Road °I ELIZABETH LUND / HOME, INC. ° Vol. 33 Pg. 80 Vol. 392 Pg. 161 w . $� MOORE HUNT � S3°51'04"yy SBLR V. 706 P. 671 c 25.16� �^ / S85°374PE r// / 10. 1. .a — — _ _505°072611W ° / 173.16 393.03 r < E.F. FARRELL � $ (formerly A.D. OVERTON) (Ref. SBLR V. 141 P. 37 ) ,Ny / V / PAPRpNPGr I n tAYOUTft-) N05°07'26"E 17314 _ = I C14 Av N4°26'17"E 4 \1 HICKOK & BOARDMAN I 0.135Ac. to V� \ � Evergreen p >° PLACE, LLC I , Vol. 811 Pg. 66 I Vol. 392 Pg. 159 EVERGREEN I Existing Area: 3.136 Ac. I INVESTMENTS, LTD. To Evergreen: -0.135 Ac. SB Vol. 319 Pg. 31 Adjusted: 3.001 Ac. , L. Vol. 447 P 641 2m �y EXIST E33,I I 0 N 1 I OFFICE BUILDING ' 370 Shelburne Road "Sherwin Williams Plaza" a ADJUSTED R \\ 346 Shelburne Road PROPERTY LINE i �) w � EXIST. PROPERTY LINE m � (TO BE DISSOLVED) Z ACCESS EASEMENT TO "HICKOK & BOARDMAN PLACE' PAapNG LOT-1 UrouT Brpcel Existing Area: 1.405 Ac. I I From H&B: +0.135 Ac. \ I Adjusted: 1.540 Ac. I N4"19'34"E N04"1T01"E 387.71' fe.54q 25, 14�@� NO4°1913"E 173.19' GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 (t. M SHELBURNE STREET LEGEND SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE — — OTHER APPROX. PROPERTY LIN — — — - — EASEMENT LINE MMF / CMFO MARBLE/GONG. MONUMENT FOL IPF / IRF O IRON PIPE/ROD FOUND (W/ DI, 12, CALCULATED ANGLE POINT IRP O IRON ROD PROPOSED (NOTE 3) gyp, POWER POLE o-o LIGHT POLE STOCKADE FENCE —°—o— CHAINLINK FENCE AG / BG ABOVE / BELOW GRADE 9 LOT NO. (PROSPECT PARK SUBI REFERENCE MAPS or PLATS A. "Lund Home -Fisher Boundary Adjustment -Plat of Boundary Adjustment", last revised June 30, 2006, by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. City of Burlington Land Records. B. "Northeast Comer of Shelburne Street & Proctor Avenue", by F.C. Koerner, dated October 1964. recorded in Volume 49, Page 128 of City of Burlington Land Records. C. "Plan of Property of Ben. F. & Mamie E. White", by J.H. Sinclair, dated May 1926, recorded in Map Slide 68, City of South Burlington Land Records. D. "ALTA Survey - J & L Realty" dated June 2, 2005 prepared by Summit Engineering, Inc. Not of record. E. "Burlington Electric Dept. - 346 Shelburne Rd - Executive Sqr. & Lund Home". Dated Dec. 10, 1988. Map Slide 213-B, Burlington Land Records. SURVEY NOTES 1. PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO DEPICT A PROPOSED BOUND ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN LANDS OF HICKOK & BOARDMAN PLA LLC AND OF EVERGREEN INVESTMENTS, LTD. OTHER PROPEI LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE, FOR REFERENCE PURPOS ONLY. 2. SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED DURING WINTER 2006 UTILIZING ELECTRONIC TOTAL STATION INSTRUMENTS. BEARINGS SHO ARE FROM GRID NORTH, VERMONT COORDINATE SYSTEM OF BASED UPON OUR GPS OBSERVATIONS ON OR NEAR THE SIT BEARINGS MAY DIFFER FROM THOSE SHOWN ON REFERENCE PLATS. 3. MARKERS NOTED AS "IPF" ARE IRON PIPES FOUND WITH IN DIAMETERS AS SHOWN. MARKERS NOTED AS "CMF" ARE TYPICALLY 4" SQUARE CONCRETE MONUMENTS FOUND, EXCI CITY BOUNDS MEASURING 8" SQUARE. To the best of my knowledge and belief this plat properly depicts a the results of a survey conducted under my direct supervision as outlined In the "survey notes" above. Existing boundaries shown are based upon our analysis of physical and record evidence recovered, and are in substantial conformance with the record unless otherwise noted. This plat is in substantial compliance with 27 VSA 1403. Statement valid only when accompanied by my original signature and seal. Timothy R. Cowan VT LS 597 SURVEYORS: r ND CIVIL ENGINEHING ASSOCIATES, 01C, M.) 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 8o28a4-2323 Fm I,, .,h0-2211 wBS: wmv.cee Mcan corrmceT ©zo - Too— r—N ACL/TRC CRECI(ED TRC APPROVED TRC IIV.) BU LI FLIMN LOCATION MAP NOT to SCALE kRY :E, tTY :S NN 1983, D TIDE PT DATE Ca'CK'D RE i—N 7.15.09 TRC Update notes, minor edits 10.21.09 TRC Revised boundary adjustment 11.18.09 TRC Revised access easement 1-19-10 ACL MOM Bus STOP & -- Boundary Adjustment Between Hickok & Boardman Place, LLC and Evergreen Investments, Ltd. Shelburne Road & Proctor Avenue SOUTH BURLINGTON & BURLINGTON, VERMONT DATE June 1, 2009 DMInNG NUMBER .1 1 " =30' PL 1 PROr. NO. 07134 65 �1 ( ._<j-v --- .( _ - - - _ - -- - - - � - FORMERLY FISHER - /1 SITE ENGINEER: _ -- _-__- V. 407 P. 215 III TRANSFO(iMEF SUN RM-IDt.t _.__... • NV IN (e•P sE.4o I t �. Igo-- 8 ®®�a�� i / CIVIL EMGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. NV IN (12•P S)-1]0.4 (12-N)1.1]D.a E Ce EX: ce ptl.w. °O 10 MANSFIEID VIEW LANE, SO. BURLINGTON. VT 05403 a .laz.4 / 91N-1e9.9 D�"V sbil.isoD NOME ^y i \ ozeu zaza Pay. soaea.-zzn I I Z I V:WT(6•D).18094 C1EAN WT / STRUCTURE fMLL \\ \ I I wen w..wcx-vt cam a. SEDIMENT T-F I "-L `4-c- '- -o-� -c ,. i�� v I Corru9NT p 90 T.9escxven N �13 I / -_ _UE- - - -IIE- -I- -UE _-. EtlSRNG CWRXAi DRAWN INV -1791 E% PAYED _ \ 1n E%. CB PARKING y E. CB S I -u.n PROPOSED _mX Nv IN fIa OI- 1 W ] / pur (z DI-wL1eo2+ - AREA _ - IN W (e'D1-wl-lees �. _ / .. INV IN aebl- 1]]� VE _ NV IN D•() N .I _ MIL. - - - / . -. _ \ \ \ PROPEAtt MM: Nv w {IS'HD-s)-llns 4 (D� _ \ \ JSO/ CL INV OUT (iD°X E-N)i I]].V I V I . INV IN (A 01-F)-I BB.] \ \ 1 �M . _ _ _ \ I I - ® - SEISACN TINE CNECI�DA rvN lry�ebl E.1 e0.9 IY/ T W ST _ _ o JLM I I - Sr �� acRE E soeWAu s I CMPED aFOU _ _ �- - \.\____ ❑ GOING. N NU II - Wt FORCE MSE UNE OWNER: _. I � IRON fW APPROVED MW FOUND 5'AV w Ex ca V- ss GRAVITY sEWEIt T\ V Y AC wM-19a.4 10 O - Cf\ I I� I Pf0 I v2°O VI - -w- NATER UNE • I II ,� ,,V,wd +,� .F .a ua I -aUUGT---UT OI i,-/,�, <IUT '� HICKOK dBOA0RDMAJN PLACE, LLC �• �yU7l °o,E ne "e. �t: _ '" ,- - I q\1�' �(p\I / DI `OI P1- \\ -- - -OE- OE- O0 ERHEAALYD EE ERISE lE VOL 811 PG 80 -1- UNDERGROUND EUECTHC O -T- TELEPHONE USE HICKOK PrE --__�� -0� CAS UNE PAVE-n- STORN GINNAGE UNE ® SERER MANHge BOARDMAN,INC. N MA K N; SIURM ANHOIE F AT TI ] HYDRANT �V� U�UU U. UOUG C I W - W W _ _� �� W� � \ 2° v, POWER PIXE Pe W w - �v O% I cAa BASIN PROJECT: _� \\�.. '.'i. 00 UGT rOtE °.. II/`ry .X'✓')„ sw 1 VOv\ O Bau�nD uar EX. SMHJ I \ \ ox. - \ \\ � ROLEEX.f{ RIM.191e E%. PAVED I \ _' �� .. \ pNA A . e� DEgWW6 REE HICKOK & < NV IN (e°PVC)-IN.3 nu-t• w°,.� -PARKING \ \ sB1NC 5[i ' 'e IEEIR W _ I 3 INV WT (e•PVC)-1e4.1 AREA I � � � \ � �� RTWDgAMAET[ \\ dR° CWPERWS THEE w,e I ELIZABETH LUND HOME, INC. , BO^ROMAN VOLSJ PG. 1EDGE OF H-/BHUSH/woo9s [�.'S L OWON �, a d VOL.392 P0. 1 6 OVHUNK FENCE xE 1 W PARKING srpacADE FENCE r 0 gANA9ESWAE IMPROVEMENTS EX. co %EWO I INV-wi (12'Pvc)-19q z o �vcpE� I / / I RT. 7 SHELBURNE ROAD BURLINGTON, VERMONT v sT 11�Q� BU LI J},• � �' m IN (12'PVC)-19].1 R 1 RM.e I RI'MLe-sr _. .SEX ce NV INV IN 2 ,1- I INV W (2 VD) to{.B I rrr�1 INV UT (12•PVC)-1Bfl9 MV W i1(12 PCVC) B9BT S } L� Ex CD . E%. PAYED / 5 IN IIEINXV. N(I �SE)°IIte1.D I OFOiI / } PG � G .R. M215.4 AREANV OUT (eCM AV• RM. DTD NNvII(12 d2• 1N)-4{.S V0PAYED 2 vAARE WIN INvr V . v` r� � ,Qo -5.- - - -0- -- - -C - \ LINE So euRUNcroN > =4ZZ _ _ - - - - - - LOCATION MAP _ 2Go7 o O T O _n... ✓y I INNVVN (i2'PVC)-1e7.3 . STpAI B1N RIM RIM-1BB.4 INY OUT (13°PVC)-1De.a I 4 RI93.5 INV IN (1D' CMP)-1e3A a „ INV OUT (11• 0 1- _ UATS CR'CK'D RE'VIDION WP)-1B2D _ 1 I o I man 1/0 m Ex SMH _ ° , : p j ffi Gi i1 a NV G (Is' VCT)-1ea.1 N W1 dl IN v WT Os° Wr)-1m.1E:L d II 03 a a EVERGREEN INVESTMENTS, LTD. VOL 447 PG. 31 " Ii I IT� VOL447 PC. E47 SHERvnN WIWAMS PLAZA / EXISTING hI I F-1 CONDITIONS NOTES SITE PLAN 1. UUntN. A- do not pl,, r to Im.➢tlt. m r.Pr...nt III ® tIIINee I=tw upon otl)wnt to le aurwysd premlese. �4f h� u M pr rg } I 22 28 30 32 34 3 ME"1aiil ire":«iy ilt1piEitrr�0`n°ktt.An°dl aly p0 a: M li`b: too/4-720J3) prior toG�y Iltor tlon. pct DIO DATE 2. B.ndNROT, IS th. 21d Tom of the oWstin0 Hickok k Ba9rdmon DRnwwc vt.MBER ti epesnol.tted.wnih. r.IIyIt ttTh. In.�Nln w0 621� ] FEB., 2009 O M-ti-. NAVD 68. GRAPHIC SCALE s1AEe y PROCT©R AVENUE 0 9 I, o eo I 3. Thl. NNJ I. nIt p boundary eu sy Ind I. of Y tmdW t0 _ . 0 b., 111 9. m1.. 1"-30' * FlMx _ ty IBoundpry AdyN._t! prapareE On prAllWy9lwMnq ld -e PROM. N0. ( IN FEET) AuGGIONI. dot.0 2/27/O6. r mch = 30 rc 07134 cl m I �VERNE N ' I I - I NV IN (6'PVC)=184.2 �� INV OUT (6"PVC)-184.1 \\�A R KING AREA N LEGE 0 I o p PROPOSED �. —6— CAPPED w o f I c`3 197.17 0 I � � I� II EX. CB WATER LINE RIM 194.4 ( — —ce— oVERXEAD I EC INV OUT (12"PVC)=190.2 — —LIE— uNDmaa C f � �' _�•� I - - C � OAS LINE � I FINIS �� AR ry� '.STORM AN I FOR 12 DRAIN INV ' 5.0 I - � ' SST _ _ _ -_ C CRETE SIDEWALK - I 2 n, • NIDRANT WATER VAL' EX. CB I I -- - raves Pa RIM=1¢9.6 N �., .w I I /rv,,. .... AA 6 -- i91.8 — (� // o �— _ ® CATS BAs POLE INV INI (12°) NV OUT (1 V 18 )=1 .9 4.8 I / ( -S )_ V IN 12'PVC 187.1, ,� NV 011T (12 PVC)-186i9 T INJV IN (12 PVC) 189.7 — NV OUT (12 PVC)-1'89.5 -- 7 —i--'-- �` o T uGNT 80LANDu 4CN I EX. RIM CB 187.0 yh / I I / NEW CB Z Z rn v ° PHASE IV EX. PAVED PAR / / i �� o I : DEODUOUS coNlAveou! m��"' NEW STOP SIGN & I INV IN (12"PVC—NE =18,�4.5 , (RIM=192.0 ° CXIN NNI R DO NOT BLOCK INTERSECTION" SIGN I INV wv IN (1 "PVC our (�15" 11 —SE OPE -18p.1 =1da.oel- ,INV.=188.0 t. 2 ' — MANAGE! AT STOP BAR I n - - - ..... _ _ _ _ _ _ ....... �, EL EX. SMH I `� �r'i .............. .... ........... INV IN 8.6 ") I I INV IN (1 "P C SE) 181 6------"^"""'' - --`-' - -- INSTALL TRANSITION CURB ON INV, OUT ( )- 19.0 '- � N ... 1CH SITE OF WALK. WALK SHALLsT� e,0i9 �jR x ..... BE INSTALLED THROUGHI -�-- __ _lj__ __ _j .... ENTRANCE DRIVE WITHOUT CURB I DrU fi 13 y"_'-T AND WITHOUT ANY RAMPS. I I DISH I STAL NE "-CONSTRUCT NEW BIT. PAVEMENT • T— (TYP.) ... I INV. l91 5t � NEW CONIC =. PARKING AREA o M=19T- N PHASE ll ; �oo, ti NEW 8' WIDE CROSSWALK I .. ,�„ ,� INV. OUT` CURB R - / STRIPING - - - - - HANDICAP RAMP WITH - TRUNCATED DOMES �� I -EX. Ce I 7 ; n \` NV IN ((12"P )=187-s s� L 95. 5 R NEW CONC. CURB INV IN 12"PVC —187.3 I =189.4 ' ` r 18 NV IN (18" CMP)=18 .6: J END CONC. + I w NV OUT (18" CMP 182' -- r- I NEW "WIDE CONCRETE CURB (TAPERED mm n SIDEWALK ; o "� END) ADJUST MH RIM NEW CONC. CURB ..••1 . JI Lj FLYNN AVE_ 2_0 FINISH GRADE = NEW 8' WIDE CROSSWALK EX. SMM — m RIM-188.6 ••.,{•••• STRIPING �� INV IN (15"=16s.1: (AI N INV 0 5" VCT)=1851' ,• 1 CON I d IIIIIIIIIIII = L o> I n NB ....•• = I ...�166Ca5S'1'ASEMENT RECONSTRUCT ENTRANCE .r.......... I EVERGREEN INVESTMENTS, LTD. TO HICKOK & >z n I VOL. 319 PG. 31 FOR SMOOTH TRAFFIC FLOW 0 0 1 VOL. 447 PG. 641 a •^ t SAW CUT PAVEMENT ALONG DMAN PLACE7_t A m 1 ROUTE 7 CURB LINE & I U SITE y I I SHERWIN WILLIAMS PLAZA I ADJUST RIMS OF STORM ANDI O mn INSTALL NEW CB r SEWER MH 91.65 rn EXISTING = $ E INV. (12° HDPE)-187.i5 BUS STOP Ly s _- ctor A1ve. ,r icc — — —�—L� � � o W PROCTOR AVEN(rlE SCATR �Z o IN F 1 Inch =E 0 ET 1 ft. SITE ENGINEER: iTWR NIlO1R r CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. IND PAND 10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SO BURLINGTON, VT 05403 gpl.gge.t3t3 FAN: =02dM 33�1 wee www.cse vt.mm COGHT 000e ONT3 RESERVED ER um FCmc On- ACL D ELE- ENE Cucm SAV RAGE LINE OLE APPROVED SAV CLE OWNER: HICKOK & IT BOARDMAN, INC. RE TREE IGE/ERUSN/MOODS NCE NCE YAIE PROJECT: HICKOK & BOARDMAN PARKING IMPROVEMENTS RT. 7 SHELBURNE ROAD BURLINGTON, VERMONT BU LI L tl N FIYNN AVE,: D. 1 LOCATION MAP ,• = zoDa DATE CR'CR'D REVISION 11-S-OG AM R-BED PARIDNG LOT 11-13-09 AM REVISED ENTMNC6 WIDTR 1-19-10 AM Aug W NN V PHASE II PLAN DAM OCT. 2009 ORAWIN4 NUMBER 1" =20' C3 PROD. NO. 07134 /'tV VLJJ L/'IJGIV/GIVI /V r —1 I I TREE PRESEF�VATION i L J I1 PLANT LIST Hickok and Smrdman - Soudi BMHInabon Shrubs Oty. Code Scientific Name Common Name al Spec Notes I1 JBH JUNIPERUSh` nUlle'Ber HerboY Bar Har00r Junlpsr 1E. •3Con1. { NWB.00 Tree Preservation Details IN 1-1. To ANY —Wok n01 D.TT,, ALL THEE RE .T. MEASURES NUST WE wl ncu Roor zaNF olANE1ER Is aAsm ON BULnPLnrvo t.e• FOR I• of oaN. s. TR TE ' FmoNG — RbwN AI THnDUGHOLn ALL � cWSWucTlw AWAS III— SE w TITeWAt OR EOIA—T SNA PRE STDDAED NN I'll —11 GFEAITED I TTFEEE ROTECTW AROJT ON EAS e. OTECTED ARCS IF BE LEF T FT AS 11-1 AS POSSBIE FOR VATMF CONNTTI �LL OCCONRFTFD I 1 "O' ECna "ITAN SPR"NING ,w1ETbuulx0 FlRu ."I SNILM TO MAT REWIRED FOR MIS NIOLCT. S. IN AREAS OF EWCAVATON NEAR TREE, IOENTFY AND CUT NUOTS IN CONSULTATON WM 0 UNBS. CLEW ME CROWN OF OEAO. DISEASED AN WEAN "" MN " � 'LTwvSUNBS IS NOT nECONNENOFD AT MI5 FINE, 10. REFER TO SPECIFlCAICNS FOR PENALTIES AND FlNES. LEGEND EXISTING SURVEY TREE TO REMAIN ON SITE • X I EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED ODECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE OOR NAMENTAL/FRUIT TREE 0 SHRUBS SHRUB MASSING QBOULDER RELOCATED F- -1 TREE PROTECTION FENCING L - I BON TO BE POSTED 50' O.C.. EATEN. POST (SEE SIGN DETAIL R A,R DRIPLINE OF TREE 11 STEEL OR M'o00 POST ETAS NIONLY VBBLE A1.AGGTNG TREE PROTECTION fDVCE PLACED I' BEYOND DINPUNE OR NRTIEW. IF POSSIWLE I' FWC1 LIMIT OF DISTURBMCE < OxANCE MESH ND. FENCE M00T PRUNING TRENCH e' WE •U• TO SECURE V DEEP BOTTW DF FERCE C POST$ MUST BE SLAE - NTS '. SCALE - NM No LESS ro A DERTI GF 0 LESS1/F n1E DETAIL A TOTAL WEIGHT OF POsf .T O DETAIL B: PROTECTIVE FENCE 1ieProRCR M TRe1CHINC CONTRACTON SHALL MOFY ALL UIWTIES LOCATIONS. 'NHS' I. MIS FENCE SRNES AS A TREE PROTECTION DENCE 2. ESACT LGCAnON ON TiIENCN SHALL SE STMED ON MCoic PRIOR TO TRENCHNG ONLY. 2. BNDMIES OF WETENTSHALL ON MEA BE STMED O. TNENCH SHALL BE IIAMEDIA— BACIFLLED WN REN— NATIVE SOIL PRIWOR TO INSTALLNG FENCE S WODT DANACE BIALL WE AMDED. OR OTNER HICNLY ONCMIC SOIL A�^II WE ORT WIN A SAW ON COPPERS TO MINE A ROOTS SNOT A. P oxCnw BWAm IS REWIRE➢ SEF —L C SNC T SIW1N CUT, NOT TORN ON PoGPEO. !. FENCE SHALL BE IIAXTANED TNR OHWT CONSTRUCTION. MIN. 11" TREE PROTECTION AREA `I� Y scut - NTs DETAIL C � 1AnRCWENTS IBONS SIOULD BONS SHOULD MILL BE EN CFCM vaD IN— THE SON,. S. SONS —D OF THE SECINNING N9BLE TO ALL V., r.«WI.BEW WWe OF SONS TO VMS 15 MO OM, BE MADE OF NNYIE CIAPLASTC. BE PROPERLY MANTANED, PENALTES Fw WENOVAL OF $ONS. To RODTS MEN PLACING PDSTS FOR BE POSTED SV O.C. AND WTMN 20' AND END OF EAON FENCE To WE CONSTRUCTION PERSDNNEL T. J. Boyle Associates, LLC re brW mpbMllg Dt-taoe I landscape architects • planning consultants mpmp0elaw ae.� 12-01-09 Hickok 8s Boardman ra NN.Nm b.tlwWWMWIIss •JBO DL7B-t0 �F 301 wllege street • burkngton a vermont .05401 802 .658.3555 hnp:/AFWW.gborle.GDrn 1 • = 30• Planting Plan - South Burlington L-1 ti .ml. V ERMO V 1 State of Vermont A GENCY OF NA TURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation August 3 2009 Peter Smiar, Staff Engineer Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 Wastewater Management Division 1 1 1 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Subject: Boundary Line Agreement Between Lots Approved by Permits #WW-4-0584 and #WW-4-1950 Located off Shelburne Road in the Cities of Burlington and South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Peter: I reviewed the information you submitted for a proposed boundary line adjustment involving the above subject properties. The proposal is for the parcel subject to Permit #WW-4-1950 and owned by Hickok & Boardman Place, LLC, to convey 0.117 acre to the parcel subject to Permit #WW-4-0584 and owned by Evergreen Investments, Ltd., and Evergreen Investments, Ltd., will convey 0.022 acre to Hickok & Boardman Place, LLC. You included the plan Proj. No. 07134, Drawing Number PL 1 "Boundary Adjustment Between Hickok & Boardman Place, LLC and Evergreen Investments, Ltd." dated June 1, 2009 prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., that depicts the proposed boundary line adjustment. This office has determined that this minor boundary line adjustment would result in a negligible effect on the.potable water supply and wastewater disposal systems serving the residences on each lot. Therefore the boundary line adjustment qualifies for the exemption stated by the Wastewater System and Potable Water SupplyT2ules, Section 1-504(a)(11). Please note that each parcel remain subject..to their respect Permit following the boundary line adjustment. A copy of the final plan identifying the boundary line adjustment and a copy of this letter must be filed in. the City of Burlington and the City of South Burlington land records. This letter does not relieve the landowner(s) from obtaining all other applicable state or local approvals. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ernest Christianson Regional Engineer City of Burlington City of South Burlington SEP-13-00 08:46 FROM: DAVID G.WHITE ASSO. INC. ID; 1602662:3601 PAGE 3 I P,�� (7 I V E CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR C *e;,TE PLAN REVIEW All tion ! on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the 4q s info on either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board_ I nC 1*W'_'MZ;r% /Al-mr".a o& ^, A,&.&A —4,4vr - - .,L.--- -. A f"- -41 1,3Vv ve� 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address. phone and fax -z1 3)CONTACJ PERSON (Narne, mailing address, phone and fax #) 6,�A 7d' 3c4, 7 - `7U�iC 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION � a) Exlsdn Uses n Pr4psrty (Including description and size of eachseparate u e) f o 53" D �/ C e '00 y� 6i�_ G�G'.4.0 T �-i�c� b) Proposed Uses (inc de description dnd size of each new use and existing uses tb remain) Gx��,vc� ss~ o�Fice 70 Z c) Totai building square footage (proposed bUldings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to. remain�apecify if basement and mezzanine) WI; Nea) Co-vv rs aVo )�� A0 a) Number c;f real )ntlal units (If applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employs (existing and proposed): SEP-13-00 09=4G FROM: DAVID G.WHITE ASSO. INC. ID: 1802BB23601 PAGE �I g) Other (list any other infomtatIcn pertinent to this application not specificaiIV requested above); - - 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing `l.3 % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 7, % Proposed /�N e, % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed % 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ b) Landscaping: $ k,DLI/ e- a) Other snits Improvements (please list with cost): 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC al Average daily traffic (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): oV 0 c) P.M. Peak hour (in and out); 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: ✓Vc t•4 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: t � _�_ �.Q_ ..... ...... 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan appiication (see Exhibit A). 5EP- 1 3-00 013 : 4 7 FROM: DAV I D G . WH I 'I'E ASSO . INC. I D : 18026623601 PAGE 6 I hereby certify that all the infarmadon requested as part cf this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best ofAnvA nowledaa. _ SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line QATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: [j Deveioprmnt Review Board El Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: (Apfrmsp) Complete 0 Incomplete Director of Planning S Zoning or Designee Date CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Planning Commission. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) ) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) ai 204111 [ . 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 3'7D .--Ito [ .t-JNy 078 l.!�:: Ssa & 4UA-)t-Im 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office)3, 01 D 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) ' u 1 .be- z� h 4.✓Lui i rl («z� 1L1xawtA - r �3 b) Proposed Uses (include description and size of each new se and existing uses to remain) 5.. C `78 0 � v-;�VL� &',- `i L3J2 I Al b E. 5LLb r -h Qn ems/ L-, c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) bDi d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildin s and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above): 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing (. /o Proposed , /o b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) C Existing ] 0, `i % Proposed ! % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed 8 COST ESTIMATES P tooK 7N- 60'� 7 a) Building: $ b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour (In and out): 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: CC 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: '-j 1 J 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNA URE OF APPLICANT DATE OF SUBMISSION REVIEW AUTHORITY SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line 36 5 11 Planning Commission 11 Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: El/1"Compl�ete Incomplete Director r of Planning & Zoning or Designee (Apfrmsp) (4 (^ y � f v rM PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6, 1983 The balance of the land (13 1/2 acres) will remain as is. The developer would like two access points to route 7, one aligned with Harbor View Road and the other serving lots 1 and 2. Mrs. Maher said she would like to see a service road for all three lots, coming off the right of way used by Automaster, Wickes, etc. Mr. Page noted that the right of way was offset from Allen Road and Harbor View Road and that might not be the best situation. Mr. Poger said the Commission would like to restrict the number of access points on the road. Mr. Page said Larkin might have to put in a traffic light. Mr. Poger mentioned that lot 1 could have access off the right of way and 2 and 3 could come out opposite Harbor View Road, perhaps. Mr. Belter mentioned putting a service road behind the buildings, so that road could serve the land behind this later. Mr. Page asked about the Southern Connector. Mr. Ward said lot 3 was in the design area for the on/off ramps and that the city intended to approach the voters again on the'bond issue, within the year. Mr. Poger said that he was not sure of the legal status here, but that if the Commission had the power to'not approve anything on lot 3, that is what they would do. Mr. Page requested a legal opinion from the City Attorney on this. Mr.'Poger said a service road would be the Commission's wish, regardless of the uses the lots are put to. Site Plan review, conversion of Sherwin-Williams, 370 Shelburne Road, into 5 retail shops Mr. Poger noted that the lot was in South Burlington, but Burlington owns Shelburne Road in this area. Mr. Colin Lindburg, representing Mr. Farrell, said they had about 1 1/2 acres. The plan is to modify the old A & P building to improve the appearance, and to have 5 retail shops, with Sherwin-Williams remaining the major tenant. He showed the Commission a model of what they plan to do to the building. The building will be extended slightly to the north. One curb cut on Shelburne Road will be closed. Landscaping will be added along Shelburne Road, Proctor Avenue, and in front of the building. They do not show enough parking to conform to city requirements. Mr. Lindburg responded to the comments from the city's traffic consultant, Mr. Oppenlander, made in his 9/6/83 letter. He said the signallized intersection could not be changed, and Mr. Lindburg felt the curb cut to Proctor Avenue would be a relief valve to allow people from the area behind the lot to come in without having to go onto Shelburne Road. Mr. Lindburg showed the Commission another plan which responds to Mr. Oppenlander's comments. The disadvantage of the plan is that it pushes lot coverage from 71% with the original plan up to 76%. He did not think there would be many 50' trucks coming in here. Mr. Farrell noted that one tenant they were talking to was the post office. He felt they would not impact the morning peak hour, since they open at 8:30 and close at 5:00. The post office feels it would not cause more traffic than is on the road anyway. Mrs. Maher felt this branch office would serve many Burlington residents in the Flynn Avenue area. She felt the post office would need a larger space than shown, but Mr. Farrell said they had only wanted 1100 sq. ft., and the area in question is 1400 sq. ft. He said there would not be a lot of the functions here that exist at the White Street branch. Mr. Poger felt Burlington should be informed of these plans, since it is their street. Mr. Lindburg said the original parking plan had 70 parking spaces and the new one has 65. There will be pole lights which will not shine on the neighbors. It was noted that lot coverage of 76% would have to be approved by the 0 PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6, 1983 Zoning Board, and Mrs. Maher did not feel approval should be granted if one of the tenants was to be the post office. Mr. Farrell felt the parking requirements were too high, and Mr. Lindburg said that if the Commission reduced the number of spaces required, they could get the lot coverage down. Mr. Poger suggested 50 spaces be put in, with the ability to add 10 more if it becomes necessary. He felt Zoning Board approval would be needed now for such a plan, so everyone would know that the increased lot coverage would be acceptable to the Board, if it turned out that the extra spaces were needed. He did not want the Commission to be an applicant to the Board if it decided the extra spaces should go in. Mr. Poger asked the developers to discuss with the post office what kinds of uses they might have in the space, as well as the volume of traffic they expect. Mrs. Hurd moved to continue the site -plan until September 20 at 7:30 pm at City Hall. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion and it passed without dissent. Other business Mr. Poger said the City Manager had narrowed the selection for the new City Planner.' He said he could ask the finalists to come before the Commission, or he as Chairman could interview them with the Manager. It was agreed to do the latter. Mr. Poger said he had received a letter from Gerald Milot dated 9/l/83 regarding the shared access between Sugartree and Winding Brook. Mr. Milot asked 6 questions. Mr. Poger read the letter (copy on file with Planner. Mr. Poger suggested that Mr. Milot and the Winding Brook developer be asked to come to the September 20 meeting to discuss what the Commission had intended regarding that access. The meeting was adjourned at 11;10 pm. Clerk ./ PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 20, , 1283 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, September 20, 1983 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; Peter Jacob, Judy Hurd, John Belter, William Burgess, George Mona, Mary -Barbara Maher Others Present Richard Ward, acting City Planner; Pat Burgmeier, The Other Paper; Colin Lindberg, Gary Farrell, Daniel J. O'Brien, Rene Berard, Roger Dickenson, John & Esther Wyckoff, Richard Farnham, L. Palm, Robert Poger, William Schuele, Robert Chittenden, Gerald Milot, Leonard Wing, Hobert Marcellino, Peter Doremus, John Hausner Minutes of September 6. 1983 On page 2, in the motion, the words "as many plantings as possible" should be replaced with "the plantings between the pool and Ridgewood on the side of a line drawn across the enclosure". On page 3, in the fifth paragraph, the following sentence should be added before the last sentence in the paragraph: "Mr. Poger also read an earlier letter from the Fire Chief in which the Chief found no fault with the plan." On page 8, there should be a period after "Zoning Board" in the first line and the rest of the sentence should be removed. Mrs. Hurd moved to approve the minutes of September 6, 1983 as corrected and Mr. Jacob seconded the motion. It carried with Mr. Mona abstaining because he had not been present. Continuation of site plan approval of the conversion of Sherwin-Williams. 370 Shelburne Road, into five retail shops, Mr. Gary Farrell It was noted that a letter had been received from Donald Morley of the Burlington Traffic Commission, dated September 13 and addressed to Mr. Colin Lindberg. Mr. Morley saw no problem with the proposed conversion. Mr. Lindberg said he had revised the plans to show 55 parking spaces, with the assumption that if a parking problem develops later, more blacktop area can be added. He showed this new plan, which he said still allowed for the truck movement of the earlier revision. The trees proposed are honey locusts. The revised parking plan with 55 spaces would bring lot coverage to about 70X. It was noted that the plan had not gone to the Zoning Board, to seek approval for coverage greater than 70/6, if it later turns out that more parking is needed. That Board will not meet again until October 17. Mr. Farrell said waiting that long would cause a problem and he stated that it was not certain that the post office would be a tenant - they are merely one of the people he has been talking to about it. Mr. Poger stated that parking at the White St. branch and at the Elmwood Avenue location of the post office was hard and he felt this would be a heavily used area if they located here. He pointed to the plan to have 308 boxes. Mr. Farrell pointed out that turning movements would be controlled by the light and that there was what he felt was a safety valve in the curb cut on Proctor Avenue. t� Mr. Lindberg was asked whether the Burlington Traffic Commission had known the post office was a possible tenant when it wrote the letter referenced above, and he was not sure. Mr. Poger wanted to see the ClIC2 criteria before he voted on the plan. He said he would have no trouble supporting a plan without the post 2. PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 20, 1983 office, but that if it were to be a tenant, he would like a traffic analysis done. He directed the Planner to do a traffic count and look up the criteria for this zone, because he felt this tenant would cause a problem. Mr. Jacob objected that South Burlington did not even own the street there - Burlington did and we have a letter from them saying there is no problem. Mr. Poger did not want to create an unsafe situation for citizens of either city. He said approval for the plan could be given and Mr. Farrell asked to return for approval of the uses based on the city's traffic criteria. Mr. Burgess felt the City Attorney should be consulted on South Burlington's ability to control traffic in the city of Burlington, and Mr. Ward was requested to seek such an opinion from the Attorney. Mr. Poger felt that if Mr. Farrell came in with a plan for 5 retail uses, no one on the Commission would have a problem with that. If he came in with a post office or other high traffic use, he felt that use should be submitted to the Planner and a traffic analysis done. If there is any question, it should be resubmitted to the Commission. Mr. Jacob did not agree with that, but Messrs. Burgess and Belter and Mrs. Hurd indicated they could, as did Mr. Mona and Mrs. Maher. 14r. Poger so ruled. Mr. Jacob moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission grant site plan approval for the application of Gary Farrell for conversion of the existing Sherwin-Williams, 370 Shelburne Road into five retail shops as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan, 370 Shelburne Road" dated August 11, 1983, and revised September 19, 1983, subject to the following stipulations: 1. That the most southerly curb cut along Shelburne Road be closed, according to State highway standards. 2. That sewage increase into the Burlington system be accepted by -the City and that a letter be filed with the City Engineer confirming acceptance. 3. A performance bond for landscaping in the amount of $8,000 and $1,000 for curb closing shall be posted with the City prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Should one of the tenants be the United States Post Office or any other high traffic generator the developer shall inform the City administrative officer who will have a traffic analysis done for approval of the use by the Planning Commission. ' 5. This approval expires in 6 months. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion. Mr. Poger noted that the Commission would still like to have a legal opinion regarding the Commission's ability to regulate traffic spilling onto Burlington streets. Mr. Farrell was warned that if he did come back with the post office as a tenant, it was possible the Commission would not approve the use. The motion carried unanimously. Final plat application of Mr. Rene Berard, 8 lot industrial subdivision, Ethan Allen Drive Mr. Belter removed himself from the discussion due to a possible conflict of interest. Mr. Ward said there had been no changes since preliminary plat approval on July 13, 1983. Mr. Berard said he would donate a 5' strip on land on both sides of the road plus the land that is needed at the 4 corners to straighten out the road. The F- lZ - A5 P kA i-'T t5l�-UP 4-RV--A Date Received By Date Application Completed and Received By -- By CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIn-V 1) NEB, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: (a) Owner of Record Mr. Gary Farrell, c/o Sheraton -Burlington Inn 870 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont 05401. 862-6576 (b) Applicant Same as above (c) Contact Person Same as above 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 370 Shelburne Road. South Burlington, Vermont 05401 3) PROPOSED USE(S): Commercial 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e., # of units, floor area, etc.) 5 Shops Four (4) at 1,400 square feet of retail space. One (1) at 4,200 square feet of retail space. 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) Approximately twelve (12). 6) COST ESTIMATES: (a) Buildings $110,000.00 (b) Landscaping $ 8,000.00 (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) Remove curb cut, black top and resurfacing of existing parking. - $12,000.00 7) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE Summer of 1984 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) Provided on separate sheet 9) PEAK HOUR(S) OF OPERATION Provided on separate sheet 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Provided on separate sheet. FARRELL 370 Shelburne Road Area zoned C-1 District Section 19.00, Non -conforming uses and structures Section 18.00, Dimensional requirements Minimum rear yard - 30 feet Existing rear yard - 4 feet Minimum side yard 30 feet -abutting street Existing (south) side yard - 5 feet "� Minimum frontage - 200 feet Existing frontage - 198.2 feet Minimum lot coverage 701- Proposed lot coverage 71% Proposed addition 241x60' - use five retail shops F.M.V. (City records) Building $181,235 Land $ 71,765 $253,000 Estimated cost of addition and remodeling $120,000 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, 61 , TCL.: ZS3 3� D puro T 1N ikSbc169--J ES - it v t/ 6& T/H e.-IS 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) #;,VTd1Vw l S Eg�v%N G- - R o pl- p, 5y e4 r* A9q-l64iv G% ON 8Ln Z z/ 6 7 C 0) 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) 69&- FAj're-j?.6-"-(iL CO 6,, c87-�S-��-[9z phone #) EV C2 6PC6A/ ® s7-y Z :IC�C.77�DC N�n//w� iKi-/wl Kul/ Ali 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 370 5Tr-,c- E % 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSEDU�SE(S) Cftr+n/66 e1Ci-lg`tL 5%O�FlPory j 7-07- / y)..t, � S L44 4-" %ZCS % Pt2f l- tj,-y � 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) -/VO CXT&2/o)e. C-H-t6 cS - % 6/ o oa 5)C gn56: 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 9) LOT COVERAGE: building -9-2 %; landscaped areas 71 % building, parking, outside storage % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ Landscaping $ Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ i✓o•ve-- 1 1) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: _ DC�tD $ c'►e� 19 Z 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: _ DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF HEARING SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) Ever reen Investments, Ltd., c/o Doremus Associates, 112 Lake tree , Riirl inc;tQn VT 05401 (802) 863-9603 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) Doremus Associates, 112 Lake Street, Burlington, VT 05401 (802) 863-9603 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) Matthew T. Daly, Same address as above I 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 370 Shelburne Road 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) N/A 6) PROPOSED USE(S)_ Retail shopping center 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) See site plan for applicable information 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES N/A 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 29.3 %; landscaped areas21.1 building, parking, outside storage74.8% 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ N/C Landscaping $ N/C Other Site Improvements (please list with cost-) $ N/C 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Completed 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) No, change Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. ; 1-2 p.m. • 2-3 m. 3-4 p.m. p' 4-5 p.m. , 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: No change 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: No chance 9/30/94 DATE OF SUBMISSION SIGNATURE aF .APPLICANT DATE OF HEARING DOREMUS ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW WATERFRONT PLACE ONE TWELVE LAKE. STREET BURLINGTON, VT 05401 (soy) ItG:t-alsos (FAX) 658-5685 PETER M. DOREMUS STEVENJ. KANTOR MARK A. CROW` MAMIEW T. DALY 'ALSO AUMITTEt) IN CA Mr. Joseph Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sherwin-Williams Plaza Dear Joe: LEGAL A.4SI.STAW MARY A. RUTTENLOCK September 29, 1994 Pursuant to our discussions last month, I am submitting for Planning Commission review, site plan amendments to the above - referenced property. As you are aware, the City has held the position that the above property was in violation of the 800 coverage requirement. Our engineer Ken Stone has conducted a survey of the property and has learned that the property falls under the 80% maximum and is in compliance with the City' s coverage requirements. Also enclosed is a check for the application fee in the amount of $50 and all of the other necessary documents. Please let me know if you need any additional information from me and my client and I would be happy to provide you with those items. I look forward to hearing from you soon to learn when we may be able to get before the Planning Commission to seek approval of this amendment. Very truly yours, Matthew T. Daly MTD/da Enc. cc: Stuart Baraw gy c Q �,, co �all rpy, Lot Coverage BUILDINGS 17,950 29.3 30 PARKING 27,840 45.5 Gr P.HN1Y AGLE55 DRIVE5 2,525 4.1 OPEN SPACE 12,925 21.1 FLYNN AVE B_U R L I N G T 0 N "N.r SU TH k.. �-e URLI N GTON ERGVSON IAVE. TOTAL AREA 61,240 100 - AVE. ROCT YMAN AVE. WHITE PL. LILAG5 EXECUTIVE 5QUARE A55OUATES r N/F ELIZADETH LUNG HOME INC. Y RD, ;. �, I I I N/F 5GARFF AVE I I' I 349 9. 1 LAWN 'j' r WOODS � <. YANDOW + I I T r q N/F , vt ?, _ �8 U Rt. (I N G 7 n N K 1,1 ? H s u t N u 1 o N � 7 s I � / II,� �, �I I /, II CSAz`J � �� J✓�' � li _ r /)� LAWNa N .vl IA WN Ww , yg2YA.' 1 t i( DAYLILIES ] Legend Flynn 1,. 1 I I �zS' GLLMP DLIMPIES I� AMELANGHIER L410 SF. �4.. Ir-LI r . Avenue y` — PROPERTY LINE h - I cLwaP I�'Plf?Il" t H GUR6 AMELANGHIER I r� I MINDS RESTAURANT TALL STORM LINE W/BASIN < p CALIPER 1,9'SO SF. dWW 3 AND MANHOLE -3 O < A. i T.NHFI.'BDELL SANITARY SEWER LINE W/ MANHOLE I' VIVID COLOR LADS WATER LINE WITH GATE VALVE AND HYDRANT 0 • — G GA5 LINE l ( w 370 Shelburne Road I LIGHT J GONCRCtE OEf.I: L. PARIZO I 1U I,1tr 1RtJt.RRr, CLUMP U.S. P05T OFFICE ' UNOCCUPIED AREA 'I f>ARAUE UTII-ITY POLE N/F T) ni 1 AMELANGHIER 02 3.05F. 4,00 5.F. �'. /yr p EXTERIOR LIGHTS Q ' / / / ' HOUSE ll .,,,�-DAYuueS /� /,' 5HnDED L AREA TO DE CIOCCUPIED DY POST Fm OFFICE • a ,, RETAIL LaIW lily ExrnulON Owner: f r , nr nPfLE& 1N6 PAYPH NE IN t^5 JL uvrRH Nr wALe LAWN L n TAG¢ -� E��ERRY IR she--r EVERGREEN INVESTMENTS, LIMITED LAWN LAWN — MOUNTAIN A550C.IATE5 REAL E5TATE — A N _ _ ..{ * N y WATERWORKS MH W _ Pp,O, VOX q G. + PAGE N// F �I` SP. Y, ; y ^ i a, +«fd rt+.VF1a�1�I a ,� 5 �, >_` 17o y, 5TEF1. _ _ _ STOWE, VT 05672 v"eY '�'Ai'""'.(i T�'w.o �yotl ""H' P,p+, T, -"` ,vi _ - I a PrC 1OrAven Applicant: I EVERGREEN INVESTMENTS, LIMITED — — C./0 MOUNTAIN A550GIATE5 REAL ESTATE j P.O. BOX 9 STOWE, VT 05672 t J. LARK IN tL f/1i r H , M J- COVER G. KOTELLI V, + M DURRELL I I . N/F Nrf N/F NAP N/F Notes: I. INFORMATION SHOWN ON THI5 PLAN 15 TAKEN FROM A 517E PLAN ENTITLED "5HERWIN WILLIAM5 PLAZA.' PREPARED DY LAMOUREAUX AND STONE GON5ULT INC,- ENGINEER5, LAST REVISED 122-94. 2. INFORMATION ON METES AND BOUNDS AND V'. '.L.IITE5 WA5 TAKEN FROM PLAT OF LAID OF GARY a JANE FARRELL. 370 5FELDUKNE ROAD. BURLINGTON + 50. DURLINGTON, VT, DATED 10/21/80 by TRVDELL LON5ULTING ENGINEER5, INC. i Otehrs ortavma p FxEtwWaav ■�� R� NET 370 Shelburne Road 9-27-00 -B. cRAPxic scat 99014 JO 0 f Li:.AR 1 -B V lt� 370 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT taut ocher• CIV]L ASSOCIATES, PLC 99014-e3 Pw� s'rccTr ( IN FEET Pic 5 ANDREW AVENUE, EV11E 5 ESSEX JCT, VT Existing Conditions 1 1 inch 20 fL 1 "a2d PHONE:^878^g990 �..,. .. .,.,,. Site Plan CITY Off' SOUTH BURL,INGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 3, 2001 Chris Madden Main Post Office, Room 207 Haverhill, MA 01830-32 Re: Site Plan and Conditional Use Applications, 370 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Madden: Enclosed please find a copy of the Finding of Facts of the Development Review Board meeting on November 7, 2000 (effective date January 2, 2001). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental Court, pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4471 and V.R.C.P. 76, in writing, within 30 days of the date this decision is issued. The fee is $150.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long. You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4472(d) (exclusivity of remedy; finality). If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Enclosure I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 3, 2000 Christ Madden Main Post Office, Room 207 Haverhill, MA 01830-32 Re: Site Plan and Conditional Use Applications, 370 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Madden: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and comments from City Engineer, Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, November 7, 2000 at 7:30 P.M. to present your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp Encls cc: Chris Haggerty Q QQ l/ Q 11/7/00 V MOTION OF APPROVAL EVERGREEN INVESTMENTS LTD. I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve site plan application #SP-00-56 and conditional use application #CU-00-25 of Evergreen Investments, Ld. to amend a previously approved site plan for 21,420 square foot mixed use building with the following uses: 1) 14,499 square feet of retail use, 2) 2,952 square feet of post office use (federal facility), 3) a 1,850 square foot standard restaurant with 36 seats, 4) 1,410 square feet of bakery/deli use, and 5) 759 square feet of entry hall space. The amendment consists of converting 4,150 square feet of retail space to post office use (federal facility), 370 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a plan entitled "370 Shelburne Road 370 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT Existing Conditions Site Plan ", dated 9/27/00, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain i n effect. 2) The site plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Three (3) copies of the revised plan shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to permit issuance. a) The site plan shall be revised to include a bike rack. b) The site plan shall be revised to illustrate a three (3) sided screened dumpster storage area. 3) For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development review Board estimates that the change in use will generate zero (0) additonal vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4) Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. 5) Pursuant to Section 26.105(a) of the Zoning Regulations, the Development Review Board grants the applicant a $13,500 credit for existing landscaping on the property. 6) The building shall be sprinklered and have a fire alarm. 7) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 8) The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from ttc ^ dministrative Officer prior to the use of the newly converted space. 9) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. O'Leary -Burke Civil _)sociates, PLC ) Mr. Ray Belair Zoning Administrator 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 December 1, 2000 !DECEIVED Cittl of So. Burlington RE: Conditional Use Application and Site Plan Review Application — U.S. Post Office Dear Ray: Please find enclosed three (3) copies of the existing conditions site plan for 370 Shelburne Road. As requested by the Development Review Board, we have made the following revisions to the site plan: 1. The site plan has been revised to include a bike rack. 2. The site plan has been revised to illustrate a screened dumpster storage area along the north wall of the building. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Chris Haggerty 5 ANDREW AVE. SUITE 5 ESSEX JCT., VT 05452 PHONE 802-878-9990 FAX 802-878-9989 CIVIL@TOGETHER.NET DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO NOVEMBER 7, 2000 MEETING Recommended Conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plan shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning (hereinafter Director). Three (3) copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director prior to permit issuance. a) The site plan shall be revised to show the ramp on the northwest corner of the building. 3. The approved parking spaces shall be striped before issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance for the new use. 4. The applicant shall post a $600 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 5. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the change in use will generate zero (0) additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 6. Any new exterior lights shall consist of downcasting fixtures. Any change to the approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. 7. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the newly converted space. 8. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the Zoning Regulations or this approval is null and void. 9. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 5) & 6) EVERGREEN INVESTMENTS LTD —SITE PLAN & CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATIONS — CONVERT 4150 SO FT OF RETAIL TO POST OFFICE USE, 370 SHELBURNE ROAD This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for 21,470 square foot mixed use building with the following uses: 1) 14,499 square feet of retail use, 2) 2,952 square feet of post office use (federal facility), 3) a 1,850 square foot standard restaurant with 36 seats, 4)1,410 square feet of bakery/deli use, and 5) 759 square feet of entry/hall space. The amendment consists of converting 4,150 square feet of retail space to post office use (federal facility), 370 Shelburne Road. DEVELOPMENTREVIEW BOARD MEMO NOVEMBER 7, 2000 MEETING This property located at 370 Shelburne Road is within the C1 District. It is bounded on the south by Proctor Avenue, on the east by a single family home, on the west by Shelburne Road, and on the north by an office building. k 370 Shelburne Road Access/Circulation: Access is currently provided via a 30 foot curb cut on Shelburne Road at a signalized intersection, a 20 foot curb cut on Proctor Avenue, and a 25 foot curb cut for loading dock access on Proctor Avenue. No change in access is proposed. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/Setbacks: Building coverage will remain unchanged at 29.3% (30% max). Total coverage will remain 74.8% (70% max). Front yard coverage along Shelburne Road will also remain at 74.4% and front yard coverage along Proctor Avenue will remain 84.2% (30% max). The current proposal will not increase the degree of nonconformance. All setbacks are met. Parking: A total of 63 parking spaces are provided and only 46 are required. Two handicapped parking spaces are provided as required. Plans should be revised to illustrate a bike rack. Landscaping_ The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $13,500. This is not being met. The applicant has requested a landscaping credit as the site is already well landscaped. Staff supports granting the credit. Traffic: P.M. peak vehicle trip ends (vte's) will remain unchanged at 81.23 vte's. Lighting: No changes are proposed. Any changes to the approved lighting should be approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning as downcasting and shielded prior to installation. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO NOVEMBER 7, 2000 MEETING Sewer: No additional sewer allocation is requested. It should be noted that this property is connected to the City of Burlington sewer and water systems. Dumpsters: There are currently two dumpsters existing on the property. These dumpsters are located outside of the existing dumpster storage area. Staff recommends that the dumpster storage area be revised to include screening on three sides to prevent the dumpsters from being moved freely around the site. Other: The site plan should be revised to accurately depict the front yard along Proctor Avenue. The sidewalk currently runs along the south facade of the building with a green space separating the sidewalk from the street. The plan currently illustrates a green space between the building and the sidewalk. 7) FAR WATER LTD — FINAL PLAT AMENDMENT — 85 UNIT PIED, 303 & 304 LIME KILN ROAD This project consists of amending a previously approved planned residential development consisting of 85 units in four (4) buildings on two (2) lots. The amendment consists of: 1) reducing the number of units on the west side from 40 units to 37 units, 2) increasing the number of units on the east side from 45 units to 48 units, 3) parking layout modifications, and 4) building footprint and elevation alterations, 303 & 304 Lime Kiln Road. The Development Review Board approved the final plat for this property at their May 16, 2000 meeting (minutes enclosed). This property lies within the Residential Four District. It is bounded on the north and west by the Winooski River and on the east by the farm lands of John Belter. On the south, a residence and a commercial structure bound the property. Lime Kiln Road runs through the middle of the property dividing Lot # 1 from Lot #2. Coverage/setbacks: The proposed building coverage for lot #1, or the 12.5 acre lot, will remain unchanged at 4.4% (20% allowed). The total coverage is unchanged at 9.7% (40% allowed). The building coverage for lot #2, or the 12.67 lot (the eastern parcel), is unchanged at 2.9% (20% allowed). The total coverage is unchanged at 5.4% (40% allowed). Setback requirements are met. Densi : The maximum number of units allowed on the westerly parcel, or lot two (2), is 50 units and 48 units are proposed (12.5 acres x 4 units/acre = 50). This density requirement has changed as Lime Kiln Road will not be realigned and therefore lot two (2) will remain 12.5 acres and not be reduced to 11.44 acres as previously thought. The applicant should provide written confirmation from the State of Vermont that the realignment will not happen. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: November 7, 2000 agenda items Date: October 19, 2000 !Final plat - Farwater, Ltd., Airport Parkway/ The multi -family buildings should be sprinklered. 2. Site Plan, 370 Shelburne Road The building should be sprinklered and have a fire alarm. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: November 7, 2000 agenda items Date: October 19, 2000 �. Final Mat - Farwater` Ltd., Airport Parkway The multi -family buildings should be sprinklered. 2. Site Plan, 370 Shelburne Road The building should be sprinklered and have a fire alarm. PLANNING COMMISSION 25 October 1994 page 2 4. Site Plan application of Doremus Associates to amend a previously approved site plan to correct drafting errors showing overall coverage. The site is developed with a 16,476 sq. ft. retail center, 370 Shelburne Rd: Mr. Daly said the center contains a Post Office, Sherwin Williams, and other uses. The original site plan was not drafted by a certified engineer. Coverage was shown at 82%. There have been other site plans showing different coverages. The Commission had originally erred in saying coverage maximum was 80% when in fact it was 70%. 80% was approved. Mr. Daly's client bought the property in 1991 and learned of the problem when a tenant sought a conditional use permit. They have tried to settle with the previous owner and the city. The pro- perty has been surveyed by an engineer and the coverage was found to be 78.4%. They are asking for this figure to be approved. Mr. Burgess said there is also an issue of some landscaping that was never done. Mr. Daly said his client will landscape to the Commission's satisfaction. Mr. Sheahan suggested the applicant work with the City Planner on this. Mr. Weith noted there had been a privacy hedge shown on the approved plan which has not been put in. Mr. Austin moved the Planninq Commission_approve the site plan application of�Doremus Associates to amendWa previously approved site__plan to correct _drafting errors showing overall covera e. The site is developed with a 16,476_sq. ft. retail center, 370 Shelburne Rd as depicted on a lan entitled "Sherwin Williams Plaza, 370 Shelburne Road, South nqton, VT"__prepared b Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary, dated 9/9/94, with a last revision date of 10/15/94 , with the following_ stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations whichare not super- seded by_this a roval shall remain in effect. 2. The�plan shall beWrevised ror to issuance of a zonin /build- inq permit to show the changes listed below and shall require approval�of the City Planner. Three copies of the approved_ re_- wised _plan shall be submitted to the CitvWPlanner_prior to permit issuance:_ a. The plan shall be revised to _s_how the $750 _ worth_ of land- scapino reouired as part of the 1992�aproval. _ The revised_ Elan shall �include 2_pl ntinq schedule. b. The_plan_shall be revised to show a�screened dumpster area similar to the approved plan. W PLANNING COMMISSION 25 October 1994 page 3 3. The 22Iicant shall obtain a zoning buildin ep rmit within six months or this approval is null and void._ 4. AnyW2Lysical changes to the plan shall require the approval of the Plan ning—CommissoZ;. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site Plan application of Brad Rabinowitz to amend a previously approved site plan by revising the parking layout and making other minor modifications. The site is developed with a 7,900 sq. ft. animal hospital, 8 Calkins Court: Mr. Rabinowitz noted there were several issues: a) The applicant had a chance to save several large trees by mod- ifying the parking layout. They left out one or 2 spaces from what was in the plan. They are still above the requirement. b) They reduced the size of the building by about 500 sq. ft. c) They extended the roof over the dumpster. Mr. Weith said they still meet the landscaping requirement. There is, however, a question of substandard parking spaces which are too narrow (8.5 ft. instead of 9 ft). He recommended the plan be revised to show the correct dimensions of the parking spaces. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Brad R binowitz to amend a previously 2p2roved site_ plan b_y revisinq the arkinq layout and making other minor modifications. _The site is developed with a 7,900 sq• ft. animal_ hospital, 8 Calkins Court, as depicted on a plan entitled "Brown Animal Hospital, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Brad Rabinowitz Architect,_ dated March 16, 1993, last re_v_is_ed_ on 9/ 26/94, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not super- seded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The an shall be revised within 30 dais of approval to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three copies of the a proved revised plan shall be sub- mitted to the City Planner within 30 days. a) The plan shall be revised to show the width of the parkin spaces at the westerly end of the site as nine feet. 3. Any hysical chan es to_the plan shall reguire the approval of the To: CITY OF SOUTH I URLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 �4,. S (-4. From: 2/T�-j ac Fax g' Date: �`Zo/ri c/ Phone•. Pages: wT` 1 11/20/2000 09_52_ 8 U'N9989__ _ OLEARYBURKE_ _ _ _ _ PAGE 01 O'LUAKY-R U RKE Ci V 1L 1i�,tJban a asap : ++� FACSIhI1LE TRANSMITTAL SHEET Ht Oki: Sara MacC..allurn Chris Haggerty CO M I' ;1 NY: n t"Yk-' City of South Butli ngton November 20, 2000 PAX NUM51IX "PO"1M. NO. OP Pn(!6:51N(;j.L'D1N(, COVUX 846-4101 2 MOM', NUMNIX PnoP;'(."1N.4AA1(: 370 Shelburne Road, South Burlington P P1k(111;,(;'1' NS'MA4;R: Bike Rack 99014 ❑ 111t(iI:N'1' R1 FOR REVIEW ❑ 1>LE.ASE, CUbMIiN'I' ❑ I IAR) COI)Y TO !;01.1,DW N(1'1'1:9/t;(1MMF:N'1"ti: Sara. Attached is a photo from 370 Shelburne Road with the proposed bike rack shown_ This space on the brick, (underrneath the overhang) is near the doors to the vacant retail space (formerly Sherwin Williams). Please let us know if this is a good location., and feel free to call, with any questions. Thank you, C;hns 5 .iNARE.W aVENUR, SUITE #5 E:SS) X JCT., VT 05452 878-9990, F:kX 878-9989, E-N.1l1..: CIVIL@TOGETHER-NET Wall 1� wm .ti Y No Text No Text /or, 11-:�1-146�61011 ze4-15�� oGo ; l' 1--, s7G- 2SG �3 sUd ✓ U � �/CsC G r� C� l� JI, Alf -- 23 Al (tzcr-� P4 a,-, -�-7r-, � k c *-4 F-V () (, q t v cFA 116-6R � , 0'. .�, - �Ile` #N6F July 7, 1992 Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sherwin-Williams Plaza, 370 Shelburne Street Dear Joe, REAL ESTATE 1 N C. Enclosed please End the following materials in connection with our request to change one tenant at the above existing shopping center: Site Plan Application Application Fee ($15.00) Site Plan (5 copies) Reduced Site Plan (11 x 17) Memo to Mr. Donald Morley Letter from Joseph Oppenlander The Site Plan is the same as was approved back in 1983 when the center was divided into multiple shops and 1,400 SF was added for the Post Office; except, an additional 8 parking spaces are depicted. These additional spaces have existed since the 1983 renovations and seem to have been added merely by striping the center part of the parking lot. By my calculation, this proposed use requires 2 parking spaces for its 300 SF of planned "retail floor area" plus 12 spaces for its 36 planned fixed seats for a total of 14 spaces. The remaining stores have 6,800 SF of "retail floor area", as they presently exist, requiring 45 spaces. The entire center therefore requires 517 spaces, where 63 exist. Joe Oppenlander seems to have resolved the question of traffic in his letter to me dated 7/6/92. This information is being reviewed by Mr. Donald Morley, on behalf of the City of Burlington which owns the entire street and signals in front of the center. Please let me know if you require any additional information, in support of this application, and schedule us for review by the Planning Commission at their earliest convenience. Sincerely Yours, GU -- Eric F. Farrell The Wells -Richardson Building P.O. Box 923, 125 College Street Enc. CC: Evergreen Investments, Limited, Owner Anthony P. Gamache, Applicant Burlington, Vermont 05402 802-658-6666 Residential • Commercial • Business Brokers Property Management 0 Development I Conditional Use Application Narrative for 370 Shelburne Road, U.S. Post Office Dear Ray: We are writing on behalf of Evergreen Investments, Ltd. in regards to a proposed expansion of retail space at 370 Shelburne Road. The proposal is to expand the existing U.S. Post Office (currently 3,002 sf.) into an adjacent retail space (3,874 sf.) for a total of 6,876 s f The purpose of the proposed expansion is to add retail postal space to the existing office. The expansion will be achieved by interior modifications only. Please review the following information in regards to the need for a Conditional Use Approval. The proposed expansion falls under section 26.056 of the Conditional Uses regulations which reads "any alteration, extension or other change to an existing conditional use shall require review under the requirements of this section. " Since this would be considered an expansion of an existing conditional use, it is required that the criteria for a conditional use determination be met. Please find the following responses to the Conditional Use review items: 26.052(a) The capacity of'existing or planned municipal or educational facilities: The proposed use will occur within the building at 370 Shelburne Road. The U.S. Post office is currently located in 3,002 square feet of space and the proposal is to expand to the adjacent vacant space of 3,874 square feet. As this proposal will be an expansion within the building itself, it will have no adverse impacts on the capacity of existing or planned municipal / educational facilities. 26.052(b) The essential character of ' the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor the ability to develop adjacent propertyfor appropriate uses: The building at 370 Shelburne Road is currently used for retail and restaurant purposes including: Blimpies, Mings Restaurant, Vivid Color Lab, and the U.S. Post Office. The proposal is to expand the existing Post Office into the vacant retail space next door (formerly Sherwin Williams). The modifications to the existing building resulting from the expansion would be in the interior only, with no changes to the outside appearance. Since the Post Office is existing, this proposal will not have an adverse affect on the character of the area. 26.052(c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity: Access to the building at 370 Shelburne Road is from two (2) existing points. The northerly access to the building is a signalized intersection which provides for all turning movements. The southerly access is unsignalized (from Proctor Avenue) and allows for all turning movements. The building is currently occupied by mixed retail and restaurant uses. The proposal to expand the U.S. Post Office to include retail U.S. Postal supplies is not expected to increase visits to the Post Office or traffic volume to the vicinity. The proposed use will not have an adverse affect on traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. The current service area of the Post Office will not change. 26.052(d) Bylaws in effect: The use is a proposed expansion within an existing retail / restaurant complex. The proposed use is a listed conditional use and subject to approval from the Zoning Board of Adjustment the use will comply with Town Regulations. 26.052(e) Utilization of renewable energy resources: The proposal is the expansion of an existing use into an existing retail space. Therefore, there will be no adverse affect on the utilization of renewable energy resources. 26.05209 General public health and welfare: Since the proposal is to expand an existing U.S. Post Office into adjacent retail space, there will be no adverse affects on the general public health and welfare. The U.S. Postal Service provides important services for the general community and it's location is in harmony with the mixed residential / business area. O'Leary -Burke Civil _ )sociates, PLC October 3, 2000 RE: Conditional Use Application and Site Plan Review Application — U.S. Post Office Dear Ray: We are writing on behalf of Evergreen Investments, Ltd. in regards to a submittal for Conditional Use review and Application for Site Plan Review for their proposed expansion of the U.S. Post Office at 370 Shelburne Road. The proposal is to expand the existing U.S. Post Office into vacant retail space for retail use. Please find the following attached information for the Conditional Use Application: 1. $85 Application fee; ,.� 2. Application for Conditional Use; 3. Conditional Use Narrative Please find the following attached information for the Application for Site Plan Review: 1. $60 Application fee; 2. Application for Site Plan Review; 3. Five (5) full size Site Plans; 4. One (1) reduced 11 "x 17" Site Plan If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, U v Chris Haggerty 5 ANDREW AVE. SUITE 5 ESSEX JCT., VT 05452 PHONE 802-878-9990 FAX 802-878-9989 CIVIL@TOGETHER.NET To: Applicants From: Sarah MacCallum, City of South Burlington RE: Project Staff Notes Date: October 24, 2000 SP-00-56 & CU-00-25 EVERGREEN INVESTMENTS —4200 SQ FT OF RETAIL USE TO POST OFFICE USE, 370 SHELBURNE ROAD Previous Action: Site plan approval on October 25, 1994 by the Planning Commission Overview: The applicant is seeking to convert 4200 sq. ft. of retail use to post office use. Issues: ■ The applicant should submit the cost of construction and the type of construction. ■ The applicant should note all proposed landscaping on the plans and submit a landscaping schedule or request a landscaping waiver. ■ The plans should be revised to note any changes to the exterior lighting. ■ The applicant should submit the proposed square footage of retail floor area for all of the business as well as the proposed gross floor area for the post office. ■ The plans should be revised to include a bike rack. ■ The applicant should submit a sewer allocation request if additional sewer is needed. Completeness of Plan: The applicant has submitted insufficient information for Development Review Board to consider the site plan and conditional use approval. The requested information noted above should be submitted no later than October 30, 2000. Recommendation: Staff recommends that additional information should be submitted. the criteria or subcriteria at issue, why a hearing is required and what evidence will be pres- ented at the hearing pursuant to Environ- mental Board Rules 14 and 51[B][31[d] No hearing will be con- vened unless a party submits a written request to the Commission on or before TUESDAY, OC- TOBER 31, 2000, or the Commission sets the matter for hearing on its own motion. Prior to con- vening a hearing, the District Commission shall determine that substan- tive issues requiring a hearing have been raised pursuant to Environ- mental Board Rule 51 [D]. Parties entitled to partici- pate are the municipality, the municipal planning commission, the regional planning commission, state agencies, adjoining property owners, and persons granted party status pursuant to Envi- ronmental Board Rule 14[B]. Dated in Essex Junction, Vermont, this 13th day of October 2000. Mary B. Trottier Environmental Board District #4 Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 T/802-879-5658 E/mary.trottier@ anr.state.vt.us October 21, 2000 w I MR STATE OF VERMONT ADVERTISEMENT Tri-State Coalition Pharmacy Benefit Management Request for Proposals The states of Maine, New Hampshire and Ver- mont are seeking to so- licit competitive sealed proposals from organiza- tions interested in enter- ing into a contract with each state. The purpose of this Request for Pro- posals fRFP1 is to obtain Pharmacy Benefit Man- agement [PBM] services. The contracted vendor will work closely with provide selected PBM services to each state. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTAT INVITATION FOR BIDS Sealed bids, on forma, furnished by the State, will be received until 11:00 a.m. prevailing time on Friday, Novem- ber 17, 2000, at the Of- fice of Contract Adminis- tration, Room 219. North Lobby, National Life Building, Montpelier, VT for the construction of the project hereinafter described. The time of receiving and opening bids may be postponed due to emergencies or unforeseen conditions. LOCATION: Bennington-Hoosick AC NH DPI 0146[1]C/4: In the Town of Bennington on VT Route approxi- mately 4565 meters east of the Vermont/New York state line at station 16+695.000 extending east for a distance of 610.027 meters and end- ing at station 10+064.800 CONSTRUCTION BEING: Construction of a limited access highway consis- ting of roadway and bridge construction with associated grading, pav- ing, drainage, pavement markings, signing and other related items. Plans and Bid Proposals may be seen and ob- tained at the Agency of Transportation, Montpel- ier VT and may be seen at the office of W. Gam - mall, District Transporta- tion Administrator #1, Bennington, Vermont. Minimum wage rates predetermined by the Secretary of Labor for the project are set out in the advertised specifica- tions and bid proposals, and such rates are a part of the Contract covering the project in accordance with Section 115 of the Federal -Aid Highway Act of 1956. This Contract is subject to the Work Hours Act of 1962, PL 87-581, and implement- ing regulations. Contrac- tors must perform. this work under the Fair La- bor Standards Act [Fed- eral Wage -Hour Law] as well as all other applic- able labor laws. Min- imum labor and truck rates have been prede- termined by the State Transportation Board and are set out in the Bid Proposal. Contractors bidding on this project must be qualified in accordance with the Agency Regulations. The Vermont Agency of Transportation hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively insure that in any contract en- tered into pursuant to this advertisement, mi- nority business enter- prises will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will no be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, religion. sex, or national uriyin ❑i —1. - eration for an award. The ight !s reser ,erl to reject anv or all bids, to waive PUBLIC HEARING jH BURLINGTt 1VELOPMENT VIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South B r- lington City Hall Con ncr� Qe Room. 57 r t Vermont on_.TtAssday, November 7, 2000, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1jFinal plat application #SD-00-50 of John Larkin to amend a planned unit developp- ment consisting of a 200 room hotel, a 60 room hotel, restaurant and three unit multi -family dwelling to allow the De- velopment Review Board to undertake a technical review of the application pursuant to Section 26.154[f] .of the zoning regulations. The amend- ment consists of adding a ground mounted HVAC unit, adding a trans- former, and revising the landscaping at 1702 Shelburne Road. 2]Final plat application #SD-00-55 of Far Water Ltd to amend a previ- ously approved planned residential development consisting of 85 units in four [4] buildings on two [2] lots. The amendment consists of: 11 reducing the number of units on the west side for 40 units to 37 units, 2] increasing the number of units on the east side from 45 to 48 units, 31 parking lay- out modifications, and 4] building footprint an ele- vation alterations, 303 & 304 Lime Kiln Road. 31 Final plat application of Ironwood Real Estate, LLC to amend a previ- ously approved planned residential development consisting of 297 resi- dential units and an 18 hole golf course. The amendment consists of adding decks to the rear of 17 duplex buildings, Fairway Drive. 41 Application #CU-00- 25 of Evergreen Invest- ments Limited seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Con- ditional Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to convert 4150 square feet of retail space to post office use, 370 Shelburne Road. 51 Appeal #AO-00-10 of Judge Development Cor- poration, Tekram Part- ners & Century Partners of a decision by the Ad- ministrative Officer to is- sue Notices of Violation #NV-00-27, #NV-00-28 and #NV-00-29 dated 9/26/00 for property at 100 & 102 Dorset Street and 4 Market Street. John Dinklage Chairman South Burlington Develooment Review Board October 21, 2000 partments, hull time & seasonal positions avail- able. CPA's ad CPA can- didates may send re- sume in confidence to: A.M. Peisch & Company, LLP, 101 Main St. Bur- lington VT 05401 or e- mail to dwood@ ampeisch.com. ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE Join us in the fast -paced field of television adver- tising. WPTZ-TV seeks a progressive, motivated individual for an entry- level sales position. Work with existing ac- counts, develop new business, and help us with convergence proj- ects. Strong computer skills are important. Col- lege degree preferred. Experience in media or advertising is a plus. Send resume and cover letter indicating referral source to: Account Exec- utive Search, WPTZ-TV, 553 Roosevelt Hwy, Col- chester VT 05446 or 5 Television Or, Platts- burgh NY 12901. EDE ACCOUNTING Terrific opportunity for an accounting professional in our fast growing, high tech, high energy,interna- tional videoconferencing company. We need a de- pendable, highly orga- nized team player with good communications skills for daily interface with operations staff and management. Responsi- bilities include A/R, A/ P and data entry. Microsoft Office proficiency re- quired. Send resume to:, Proximity, Attn: Madelyn Cataford,[mcataford@ proximity.com] PO Box 1008. Burlington, VT 05402-1008 www.proximity.com. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE/ ACCOUNTS RECEIV- ABLE SPECIALIST This individual will be responsi- ble for invoicing, collec- tions, tracking and updat- ing accounts receivable records. Duties include preparing invoices, recon- ciling charges to invoices, communicating with cli- ents and creating man- agement reports. Candi- date must have prior Quickbooks experience and good bookkeeping/ accounting skills. t'r tr tr t� PAYROLL SPECIALIST This individual will manage payroll prep- aration, record keep- ing and payroll tax re- porting. Candidate should have payroll processing experi- ence ina multi -state environment as well as a familiarity with multi state tax issues and regulations. Applicants should send resumes and let- ters of interest to: Primesoft, 1 Lawson Lane, Burlington, VT 05401. Or E-mail to eric@primesoftgroup.com No phone calls please ACTORS/ MODELS! Shopping Network hiring all ages. No experreq. All .vork in mur area ?60- 613-1099 Dept. BF ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Needed to provide sup- -. - I„ "'N"ff Reception general office along with good cus- tomer ;,:rvice Skills. Pro- - ,., eC,..—ff Of - drivers license w/ clean record. Apply in person, McGre- -'s Pharmacy. 476 t At.EWinooski. . AUTO MECHANIC 1 yr experience pre- ferred or will train. Must have own tools. Excel- lent benefits incl. profit sharingg Apply in person: Oil & Go, Shelburne Rd, So. Burlington AUTOMOBILE SALES Lewis Acura is looking f o r experienced Sales Per- s o n to start immediately. G r e a t new products to sell, g r e a t benefits apply. Contact Mark Benoit 658-1130 Lewis Acura 1325 Shel- burne Rd. So. Burlington. Automotive ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLERK Energetic, detail oriented individual needed to complete our accounting team. Ideal candidate will possess a feam player attitude with emphasis on accounts payable. We offer health insurance, 401 K, paid vacation, sick days & holidays. Send resumes in confidence. EOE �SUBARU/HYUNDAI 660-8099. 600-833-59451 333 Shelburne Rd. Burlington, VT 05401 AUTOMOTIVE Prep/Reconditioning IMMEDIATE OPENING. We will train the right person. Excellent wage w/ paid vacation and 401 K benefits. Contact Tim Bedard at 863-1141. Jeep Isuzu AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE ADVISOR Looking for individual to join our 5 star service team. Should be detailed oriented, and feel com- fortable w/ people ° & computers. Excel. bene- fits pkg. Apply at Goss Dodge, Shelburne Rd. So. Burlington AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE ADVISOR Come loin our growing team. Saturn of So. But- lington has an opening for an exper. service ad- visor. We offer a 7 tech- nician shop, new prod- ucts lines here & more coming in 2001. We offer top pay & benefits, huge growth potential to in- clude the oppurtunity for management in our next facility in VT. For a confi- dential interview please call: Gerry Whitney at Freedorn Partners [802] 658-2300 or 1-888-658-7227 AVON! AVON! AVON! To Buy or Sell aoo zss-,ei5 BREAD & w aWMW eArre So. Burlington- v✓ :eJ CASHIERS Full and part time. '5:30 am-2pm Mon -Fri 5:30 am-2pm Sat/Sun '2 or 4pm - midnight Weekdays & wkends 'Stocking positions avail Williston Rd Mobil Short Stop, 658-4635 CERTIFIED SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER Seeking self -initiated professional who can of- fer the excitement and enthusiasm needed to educate special needs children in a unique resi- dential setting. Call or send resume to: Educa- tion Department, Ben- nington School, Inc., 19 Fairview St. Bennington, VT 05201,802-447-1557 CHEF for winter season at Dostal's Lodge in So. Vermont. Experience needed, culinary school preferred; live-in, top wages & end of season bonus. Please call Trudy @ 802-255-5373, or fax resume to 802-824-6701. CHILDCARE Cosmic Kids Daycare, in the Re- croom is looking for en- ergetic caregivers for all age groups. Competitive salary and benefits. Call Yvonne at 863-3192 CHILDCARE The PlayCare Center is currently accepting appik cations for the following positions: SHELBURNE 'Toddler Teacher (12 mos-24 mos) 9-5:30 RICHMOND 'Infant Teacher [6 wks-12 mos] T30-4 'Toddler Teacher [12 mo. - 24 mo] 7:30-4 & 9-5:30 All positions are Monday through Friday. Please contact Jennifer at 985-0787 for more info. CLEANERS to work for subcontract janitorial service in Milton Schools. 3 year contract. Excellent pay, benefits, vacation, holidays, call 863-6484. CLERICAL Smith Bell & Thompson is seeking an energetic, outgoing indi- vidual to help process paperwork for our busy insurance office. Quali- fied candidates should be knowledgable with Microsoft Office Prod- ucts & be detail oriented. Please send resume to: PO Box 730, Burlington, VT 05402 Attn: Barbara Donnelly COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Salary Range $47,000 - $53,000. The Town of Es- sex, Vermont, a growing suburban community [population approximately 19,500] is seeking a highly motivated professional to manage a five person de- partment. The director ini- tiates activities to imple- ment the Town Plan and oversees the development review process in the Town. Responsibilities will include preparation of by- hning of review process and implementation of a progressive town pian 10/03/2000 15:58 802-253 MOUTAIN ASSOCIATES OLEARV BURKE PAGE 02 PAGE 02 ck Its"Ambo„r AWku" #. ap+ti•,ut Mpiw ftW am" ter RLMOM FLMDA'M M AMXWr 1--vo ow` >/ I.rrww wM dw�eMlrN r[pp� �'7D � Gl � 1 �r�,d--�i�.•.,,..,..�,...,.,, wMrr�s >b ��(e7 �iilwaodo ( ) "am4 � �i1we adkw r m in oa�Mlllaa.i ur c wr�wt U PMENIMM IrMAwn +r*Ii 4 1110 4n""40IMP nw� .& 00v&%pFAd Ad). TW 200 N 461Mw Gram fm �10PAN` 64 w�.rt f C 7C b , , i - mo Mir I�uM r chw 111, Md@ 34 v. tk � b� ombpr s boor. o w d I lr�l s I M�� p� 4�..� 171 awa Now. S" rt TtlQ F,%t w #WMWW for Ad"ft « ka am. .rm�. i wr •Zillme &%*AWOL L a1waft+.. in K. a D. YANOOW N/F FLYNN AVENUE L PARRO N/T 0. S. PA0F. N/F NOTE: INFORMATION ON MM AMD BOUNDSd N V?W M WAS TAKEN FROM PLAT N1 T OF LA CF CARY ! JANE FARRO.. 370 SiEL URNS ROAD, BURNGTON ! SO. BURLINiTON, VT, DATED 10/21/90 BY TRIDEU CONSULTING ENONEERS. INC. EXECUTIVE SQUARE ASSOCIATES OWNER: EVERGIFEN INVESTMENT, INC C/O DOREMUS ASSOCIATES 112 LANE STREET BURLINGTON, VT 05401 APPLICANT: DOREMIS ASSOCIATES 112 LAKE STREET BURLINGTTN. VT 05401 I 0 N/T R'49'07' W 34S't• N LAWN Woods N 7254'28' W — So2 sz' TH BURLIN G T 0 N ELIZABETH LUND HOME NC. N/F 1100, T z LOCATION MAP NIS CRESCENT F 7 FLY1/N All BURLI R O_ON _ SOVT B U R L IN a TO RUC A FEROUSCI A VE. ) I WHITE LYMAN AVE. HADLEY RED SCARFF AVE. I LEGEND \ � _ _ _ _ PROPERTY UNE �. — — — — — — (J) of AI TAL CRABAPPLES n S-B' CALIPER BARBERRY \ a CURB 10-12' SPREAD UUC RHODODENDRON t2' 7Au I 5' O.C.. 3'-4' TALL ()� BARS _ _ STORM LINE W/BASIN • \ �'41E — ® AND MANHOLE \ LAWN RFp WN ( ) RIMPSIERS (J) NEW UPRIGHT YEWS \ L��✓ JPER P MANHOLE LINE ' I (J' SPREAD) \ I'UMTut SANITARY SEINER DAYLAIES � � RII w � L . � . W. WATER LINE WTM GA TE G 10' STEEL I CLUMP — AMELANanER � g, VALVE AND HYDRANT A RIPERS ,7�1 — 0 GAS LINE 1B' Mp1 aEANouT LIGHT ' LAWN 6 jy4 r �. UTILITY POLE FEB 2 b_. I A LANCIIER �' (I EXTERIOR LIGHTS 2p TALL =O I I e > B CALIPER A. a II L R ► " ° PARKING City of So. Burlington (aJ SPACES) SHERWIN WILLIAMS PLAZA o I I n m LIRIMMPP d I J AMLIR CORKiREES B�MBERRY ALIELA/ICNER I GARAGE O I 12' MOH W . Z HOUSE DAYUUES LONACO M N AD" _ � o OXAE —� DAYUUES I I > all LLAWR1PP 'BEN AMEI.ANCHIER (2) ORNAMENTAL CRABAPPLES LATE J' Mp1 B-B' CAUPER LILAC — 10-12' SPREAD 12' TALL LAWN BARBERRY (RED) S 72.4wOB' E LAWN _ 300.00' LAWN �' LAWN WATFRwORKS . . . . . . . . . . . _ W . .. . ' .......w.... ......... ....................91DEWALK � *' 'e 'ca.' �_ V& s- - PROCTOR AVENUE J. LARKIN D. TAFT H. ! M. k J. GOVER C. R W V. ! M. BVRRELL I N/F N/F N/F I N/F GRAPHIC SCALE m W I IOIe - eo K LOT COVERAGE BUILDINGS PARKING S.F. x COVERAGE 17,950 29.3 27,840 45.5 MAX. 1< COVERAGE 30 SUBTOTAL 45,790 74.8 80 ACCESS DRIVES OPEN SPACE 2,525 4.1 12,925 21.1 SUBTOTAL 15.450 25.2 TOTAL AREA 61.240 100 7� 16, /J �AF lT GG�G��✓�� /l��7i1�, `�%c�c�� - G�c-�-;/ .fie. 10,f vvo pi� col- �k -7- � 7/ � p City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 11, 1996 Matthew T. Daly, Esquire Evergreen Investments, Ltd. 112 Lake Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Landscaping at 370 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Daly: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 The City planted the required landscaping at 370 Shelburne Road and spent only $534 of the $750 available (see enclosed invoice). Enclosed is the unspent funds in the amount of $216.00. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Raymod J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp 1 Encl Carboness VOICE34N-101 {. 4, Wilsonjones® Snap -A - Way"' Forms 1 1 INVOICE N U M B E R 128322 DATE: Mav 23. 1996 XXXX, City of South Burlington Highway Dept. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 SHIPPED TO: Sherwin Williams 370 Shelburne Road CUSTOMER'S ORDER NO. OUR ORDER NO. 91r�k —,,, 8378 DATE SHIPPED SHIPPED VIA 4-25-96 Highway Dept. So.Burlington, VT 05403 TERMS Landscaping QTY. ORDERED QTY. SHIPPED STOCK NUMBER/DESCRIPTION PRICE PER AMOUNT Materials from 4Seasons/ Yew, White Cedar 350 00 2- men 4-hours 13 00 X 104 00 Truck 4-hours 20 00 X 80 00 Total $534 00 ORIGINAL _ WllsonJones • C.,Wnl— • MADE IN U S A. 44N-4r Triplicate • C WilsonJ—, I999 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 22, 1996 Matthew T. Daly, Esquire Evergreen Investments, Ltd. 112 Lake Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Landscaping at 370 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Daly: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be informed that the City has received the $750 from the Howard Bank for the above referenced matter. The City intends to have the work performed by the City Public Works Department in the spring. If there are any funds remaining after the work has been performed, the City will remit those funds to you on your client's behalf. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincdxely, � v Ra nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp S TITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401-5210 STEVEN F. STITZEL PATTI R. PAGE' JOESEPH S. MCLEAN (-ALSO ADMrrrED IN N.Y.) Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/ DD) FAX (802) 660.2552 January 17, 1996 Re: Evergreen Investments, Ltd., 370 Shelburne Road Dear Ray: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E. FLETCHER I received your correspondence concerning the above -entitled matter and have reviewed the attached copy of the Escrow Agreement. I am satisfied that paragraph 9 of the Escrow Agreement is sufficiently broad to grant to the City a license to enter the property at 370 Shelburne Road and to effect the necessary plantings and/or other work. In the future, it may be wise to insert a sentence or two in the Escrow Agreement which specifically gives the City authorization to enter the property of the developer to do such work. As additional assurance in this case that the developer is fully aware of the City's intentions, I suggest that you send a letter to Matt Daly informing him that the City has received the $750.00, that it intends to hold the same until it plants the needed shrubs/improvements, that the City presently intends to have the work performed by its own street department, and that if there are any funds remaining after the work has been performed, that the City will remit those funds to Matt Daly on behalf of his client. Such a letter will certainly put Mr. Daly and his client on notice of your intention to enter the lot at your convenience to effect the necessary repairs. If you have additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call. rel rFletcher e E. REF/map SON1997.COR PLANNER 658-7955 Robert E. Fletcher, Stitzel & Page, P.C. 171 Battery Street Burlington, Vermont City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 Esquire 05401 January 16, 1996 Re: Evergreen Investments, Ltd., 370 Shelburne Road Dear Bob: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find copies of correspondence, Escrow Agreement and site plan relating to the above referenced property. The developer did not complete the landscaping required of his 8/11/92 site plan approval. He was informed that he would be declared in default if the landscaping was not completed in 60 days. The landscaping was not completed within the time period so he was therefore in default. The City requested the $750 escrow money from the bank which we have recently received. The question I need an answer to is: Can we just go onto his property in the spring and plant the material without asking his permission? If you need further information, please let me know. Sinc y, 1 Raymo J. Belair, zoni and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls ESCROW AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, in triplicate, by and between Evergreen Investments Limited hereinafter referred to as "Developer", the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, hereinafter referred to as "Municipality", and' The Howard Bank , hereinafter referred to as "Bank". W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Developer has received site plan approval from the Municipality's Planning Commission for the construction and development of an 1,850 sq.ft. restaurant at Sherwin Williams Plaza at 370 Shelburne Rd., as depicted on a final dated Rev. 8/4/92 and NA plan entitled "Site Plan 370 Shelburne Road" , prepared by Eric Farrell and WHEREAS, Developer is required by -said approval, at its own expense, to complete certain improvements; and WHEREAS, the parties to this agreement wish to establish an escrow account to secure the obligations of the Developer as set forth in the site plan approval; and WHEREAS, the Bank executes this agreement solely in the capacity of escrow agent. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. Developer will at its own expense complete the following improvements in connection with its development: Landscaping as depicted on the plan. 2. DELETED 3. The Developer shall complete the improvements set forth in paragraph one no later than 7/l/93 4. The Developer shall repair or replace any faulty or defective work or improper material which may appear within 3 year of completion. 5. For the guaranty of Developer's performance of all requirements hereinabove set forth, Developer and Bank agree that the sum of $ 750.00 (Sevens Hundred Fifty Dollars) shall be set aside and held in escrow by the Bank and shall be available for payment to the Municipality, in accordance with the terms herein set forth. 6. If the Municipality shall file with the Bank a state- ment that Developer is in the judgement of the Municipality in A sixty (60) day default under the terms of this agreement, the Bank shall from time to time pay monies from said escrow fund to the Municipality, in amounts not to exceed a total enabling the Municipality to complete the improvements and requirements set forth in this agreement. 7. The Municipality will promptly submit to the Developer a copy of such statement as it files with the Bank. The consent of the Developer to such payment by the Bank to the Municipality -2- shall not be required. The Bank shall incur no liability to the Developer on account of making such payment to the Municipality, nor shall the Bank be required to inquire into the propriety of any claim by the Municipality of default on the part of the Developer or into the use of such funds by the Municipality in completing such improvements. 8. The Municipality shall not file with the Bank a state- ment of default until sixty (60) days after notice has been sent by it to the Developer by certified mail, return receipt requested, setting forth its intention to do so. 9. All monies released by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to paragraph 6 shall be used by the Municipality solely for the purpose of performing obligations imposed upon the Developer by that portion of this agreement upon which the Developer is then in default. Any work to be performed by the Municipality pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis, or shall be performed by the Municipality with its own work force and equipment or shall be accomplished in such manner as in the judgment of the Municipality shall accomplish the work most expeditiously and economically. 10. If monies are released by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to paragraph 6 and it shall later develop that a portion of the released monies are surplus to the Municipality's needs, any such surplus shall be refunded by the Municipality to the Bank to be held and distributed by the Bank pursuant to the terms of this agreement. 11. The Bank will not refuse or delay to make such payments to the Municipality when requested by the Municipality by the -3- appropriate statement, and Developer will not interfere with or hinder such payments by the Bank to the Municipality. Said statement shall contain a certificate of compliance with the notice requirements of paragraph 8 of this agreement. 12. This agreement shall terminate and shall be of no force or effect upon performance of all requirements contemplated hereby and the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph 4. 13. Upon request of Developer, but only at the sole discretion of the Municipality, the Municipality may release a portion of said escrow funds if the Municipality believes that the retention of said funds is not necessary to protect its interests after a portion of said work has been completed. Bank may release such funds only upon written consent of the Municipality. 14. Notwilbstanding the provisions of paragraph 13 the sum '�'Q, 0V of $ shall be in any event maintained in escrow until certification to the Bank by the Municipality of the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph 4. 15. This agreement shall not only be binding upon the parties hereto, but also their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. *As determined by the municipality. -4- Dated this 2nd day of December #1 19 92 al ��LEI WIN, (DEVELOPER) By: is Duly Authorize Agent CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By: Its Duly A thorized Agent (BANK) By: Its Duly Aut orized Agent PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 January 2, 1996 Will MacKinnon Howard Bank P.O. Box 409 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0409 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Escrow Agreement, Evergreen Investments Limited, 370 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. MacKinnon: Pursuant to paragraph 6 of the enclosed Escrow Agreement, the City of South Burlington declares Evergreen Investments Limited (Developer) in sixty (60) day default under the terms of this agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 8 of the Escrow Agreement, the City notified the Developer by certified mail, return receipt requested (see enclosed) of its intention to declare the Developer in default of their obligations. Therefore, pursuant to paragraph 6 of the Escrow Agreement, the City of South Burlington hereby requests the Howard Bank to pay to the City of South Burlington the sum of $750. These funds will be used to complete the landscaping improvements required as part of the 9/11!92 s?te pla_ approval. Please make the check out to "City of South Burlington" and send it to my attention at the above address. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sinc 5�ly, RZ nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: Matthew T. Daly, Esquire 1 Encl City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 2, 1995 Evergreen Investments, Ltd. Matthew T. Daly, Esquire 112 Lake Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Landscaping at 370 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Daly: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Your client has not installed the $750 worth of landscaping required as part of his 8/11/92 site plan approval at 370 Shelburne Road. Therefore, pursuant to paragraph 8 of the Escrow Agreement dated 12/2/92, he is declared to be in default of his obligations. The City of South Burlington intends to file with the Howard Bank a statement of default requesting that all monies be released by the bank to the City. Unless he fulfills his obligations within 60 days from the date of this letter, the City will submit the statement of default with the bank. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Singe ely, �Sjel i R,hymdnd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp 1 Encl Certified Mail #P 280 219 075 LAMOUREUX, STONE & O'LEA. )INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 Morse Dr. Essex Jct., VT 05452 (802) 878-4450 TO 98y se(PRi1Z 575 Douse r Sc��rrM �w--��crso� , VI" Ot5�tAOl WE ARE SENDING YOU X Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings i, Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ [LITTI n v 4 o '@mVUQm DATE JOB NO. \2 22 - �9�►`i CN ozs ATTENTION ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 3 o°i THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: REMARK-q COPY & co1 ❑ For approval ❑ For your use X As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections 0 ❑ Resubmit ❑ Submit ❑ Return —copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints ❑ FORBIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US LAN DX � t er Cx A Nc es N Ay E 3ceN) y- �Y_ ?f 7� SIGNED: -t as noted, kindly notify us at once. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 8, 1994 Matthew T. Daly, Esquire Doremus Associates 112 Lake Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Site Revisions, 370 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Daly: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on October 25, 1994. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S n erel Joe ith, City v.Manner JW/mcp 1 Encl City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 7, 1994 Matthew T. Daly, Esquire Doremus Associates 112 Lake Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Site Revisions, 370 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Daly: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the October 25, 1994 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please gi me a call.� t� L S n e Vj, JW/mcp Joe Weith, Cit Planner 1 Encl Cw� . OL. 0-0 - --- �/-7 `4 w 10/25/94 MOTION OF APPROVAL DOREMUS ASSOCIATES I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Doremus Associates to amend a previously approved site plan to correct drafting errors showing overall coverage. The site is developed with a 16,476 square foot retail center, 370 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a plan entitled "Sherwin Williams Plaza, 370 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT" prepared by Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary, dated 9/9/94, with a last revision date of 10/15/94, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to permit issuance. a) The plan shall be revised to show the $750 worth of landscaping required as part of the 1992 approval. The revised plan shall include a planting schedule. b) The plan shall be revised to show a screened dumpster area similar to the approved plan. 3) The applicant shall obtain a zoning/building permit within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. 4) Any physical changes to the plan shall require the approval of the Planning Commission. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: October 25, 1994 agenda items Date: October 21, 1994 3) EUGENE LECLAIR - 2 LOT SUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of the subdivision of a 1.79 acre parcel into two (2) parcels of 0.76 acres and 1.03 acres. The larger lot is developed with a single family dwelling. This property located at 110 Kirby Road lies within the R4 District. It is bounded on the west and east by a duplex, on the north by land owned by the City and on the south by Kirby Road. Access: The developed lot has a curb cut on Kirby Road. This should be shown on the final plat. Lot size/frontage: The minimum lot size of 9,500 square feet (0.22 acres) is being met. The minimum frontage requirement of 80 feet is being met. Setbacks: The final plat should show all existing structures on the property. This information would indicate compliance with the setback requirements. C.O. Zone: There appears to be a drainageway which crosses this property. The final plat should show the limits of the C.O. Zone. Sewer: The applicant should indicate the number of bedrooms proposed for the new lot so sewer allocation can be calculated. Recreation fee: The applicant will be required to pay the recreation fee in effect at the time of issuance of the zoning/building permit. 4) DOREMUS ASSOCIATES - SITE REVISIONS - SITE PLAN This project consists of amending a site plan approved on 8/11/92 (minutes enclosed) to correct drafting errors showing overall coverage. The previous approval required that green space be added so as not to exceed the overall coverage of the plan approved on Memorandum - Planning October 25, 1994 agenda items October 21, 1994 Page 2 9/20/83. The applicant has had a new accurate site plan prepared which indicates that the overall coverage approved on the 1983 plan can be met without adding green space. This request is basically to have the new plan approved and substituted for the 1992 plan. The site is developed with a 16,476 square foot retail center. This property located at 370 Shelburne Road is within the Cl District. It is bounded on the south by Proctor Avenue, on the east by a single family home, on the west by Shelburne Road and on the north by a large office building. Access/circulation: Access is currently being provided by a 20 foot curb Road at proposed. cut on Proctor Avenue and a 30 foot curb cut on Shelburne a signalized intersection. No change in access is Circulation is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 29.3% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 78.9% (maximum allowed is 70%). The maximum lot coverage approved in 1983 is 80.4%. Front yard coverage along Shelburne Road is 74.4% and along Proctor Avenue is 84.2% (maximum allowed is 30%). The current proposal will not increase the degree of nonconformance for coverage. Traffic: Not affected. Parking: The existing uses on the property require a total of 59 parking spaces and the plan indicates that 63 spaces including two (2) handicapped spaces are available. Landscaping: The $750 worth of landscaping required as part of the 1992 approval was never planted. Unless this landscaping is f installed, the City will be forced to use the funds in the escrow�Sr� account to fulfill the landscaping requirement. The plan should be revised to show the landscaping which has not yet been planted and a planting schedule. Dumpsters: The plan should show a screened dumpster storage area similar to the approved plan. Lighting: No changes 2 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 21, 1994 Matthew T. Daly, Esquire Doremus Associates 112 Lake Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Site Revisions, 370 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Daly: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Wally Possich were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 25, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely,, oe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp Encls e PLANNING COMMISSION 11 August 1992 page 3 landscapin bond for the multi -family units. 3. The _Llanr�Lng. Commission rants an $11,034 lap_qscaping credit for existin ve etation to remain. This ve etation exists in the pro_Ssed_common area within the multi -family portion of the de- velopment. 4. The Planning_Commission rants a revised total sewer alloca- tion of 76,650 pd to account for ten fewer units in the devel- opment. The applicant shall pay the appropriate sewer fee prior to issuance of a zonin /buildin ermit. 5. Notes on the plan shall be revised prior to recording to cor- rectly indicate a total of 28 multi -family buildin s. 6. The revised final plat plans shall be recorded prior to is- suance of a zoning/building permit and within 90 days or this ap- proval is null and void. The revised final plat plans shall be signed_by the Planninq Commission Chair or Clerk prior to re- cording. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site plan application of Anthony Gamache for change of use of 1850 sq. ft. within an existing retail center to a 30-seat restaurant, Sherwin-Williams Plaza, 370 Shelburne Rd: Mr. Austin stepped down during this discussion due to a conflict of interest. Eric Farrell located the property on the corner of Proctor Ave. and Shelburne Rd. The space was used as retail (Keene Medical) and they now want to change to restaurant use. There would be no changes made to the building. The building was built as an A&P during the '60's and was built at 91% coverage. Later, a concept plan brought coverage down to 800. It was actually built at 83%. The submitted plan brings coverage down to 80% by removing some pavement. They would prefer not to do this as it involves some loss of parking. Mrs. Maher asked what kind of restaurant is planned. Mr. Gamache said it would be like Cork & Board with hours from 7 am to 7 pm. It would be for sit down and take out. Mr. Sheahan said he had never seen a parking problem there. Mr. Criag and Mr. Sheahan wanted the 80% coverage. Mr. Teeson saw no reason to go to 800. Mrs. Maher and Ms. Peacock felt green space should conform to standard. Mr. Sheahan asked if there would be any outside seating. Mr. PLANNING COMMISSION 11 August 1992 page 4 Mr. Farrell said there would not. If they later decide they want it, they will come back to the Commission for approval. Ms. Peacock moved the Commission -approve the site lan a lica- tion of Anthony Gamache for change of use of 1850 sq. ft. within an_existin retail center to a 36-seat restaurant as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan, 370 Shelburne Road," dated 9/13/93, last revised 8 4 92, with the_followinq stipulations: 1. The applicant shall post a $750, 3-year landscapin bond Prior to issuance of a zonin /buildin ermit. 2. Any new li htin shall be downcastinq, shielded luminaire and shall be approved by th-e-City Planner prior to installation. 3. As expressly represented by the applicant, there shall be no outside seating -at this site. 4. The zoning/buildin permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Austin rejoined the Commission. 6. Site Plan application of Investors Corporation of Vermont for construction of a 37,500 sq. ft. building in two phases for warehousing and related office use, lot #1, Green Tree Industrial Park, Gregory Drive: Amy Gregory located the property at the corner of Shunpike Rd. She said there would be 25,000 sq. ft. built in phase 1 and 12,000 in phase 2. Traffic has been projected at 80% warehouse use and 20% office. Ms. Gregory noted their access is not directly across from the Granger curb cut as tractor trailers need access in the rear of the lot. She said they will have the best landscaped lot in Green Tree Park. Mr. Weith noted they show only the original subdivision landscaping and are signifi- cantly short for the new building. He said this application needs $15,000 in landscaping for phase 1 and $7,000 in phase 2. This is over and above what was required at subdivision. Mr. Craig asked if the revised plan satisfies this requirement. Mr. Weith said he hadn't had a chance to check as it was just handed to him. Ms. Gregory said it did not. Regarding parking, Ms. Gregory said they are asking for more than the facility seems to need. If there is more office use, they will need the parking. Mr. Burgess said there is no point in �.' having additional parking if the problem is going to be traffic. Mr. Craig said he didn't want to have the parking for a use that K. It D. YAM" II/F FLYNN AVENUE L PARIZO NIF a R S. PAGE N/F "' K'u I n 1a ® E E C E a D OCT 2 c 994 City of So. Burlington HW4 INFORMATION ON METES A1D E°INI)S AID UTRDTR WAS TAXEN FROM PUT OF LAID Of ONLY A 4" PARIML 370 SHEUKIRNE ROAD. RIRiHCION k 30, NINSIICTOII. Yr. DATm 10/21/80 5Y MOIL COIMULTMD ENGIImt& INC. = I I I I ,I72= w BVRRLIINGT0N _30�2L ---� SOU TH BURLINGT0N V-1eo AL oRAIIIrPLEs CALIM BARBERRY 10-t2' SPREAD U AD TILL I S' G`- S-/' STALL LAW\ -"' gL DUIiSiE1t5 OWNER: EYo1GRmI MIE58ENT, INC. Oro DOFOW ASSOCUTES 112 LAM SHEET PURLING". Yr 054M APPLICANT: DOQIDS ASSOMIE5 112 LANE STREET SURLINGMIL ROOM N 7254'W W - I �I'F .RRIMFR DAYLAES . _. \ 2 TALL .♦ ANIRRS �011"I'm • I is' mm CLEAMOUT UN, • � b: � CLUMP ' I I 4 8' CALIPER A t 1N IRASE LL I /P N I I D • .�.. PARKING • I I (63 SPACES) SHERWIN WILLIAMS PLAZA ^I o I I 0 { W_ {• `��dII , Il #—® CO1R2K' IRINfEAS BARBERRY- CLUMP ' GARAGEALELANC/ER OAS MRNDN AO=awULL OAYLNES 110119E I ` ARIM 1 (2) ORNAMENTAL CRASMFItS LATE S NIW • I I cNEx 10- — to-12' SPP zREAD LIL TALL URN sawmT52Y (RED) —� ..... w ... ....................gpE7fAtll ...... .. w .... W... ......... uw LAWN RL ........ IV* KS= - PROCTOR AVENUE r11111 dLARILMD.N/v IL a M M/F O°10t 0. NR07E111 v. ! ML Aw1FU. LB GRAPHIC SCALE i M 1N M ( DI rsi 1 I INPI - E0 R EUZAKIH LIRD NOME W- PROPERTY LINE �- —®— — CURS STORM LINE W/BASIN AND MANHOLE SANITARY SEVER LINE W/ MANHOLE ... W... WATER LINE PATH GATE VALVE AND HYDRANT — ° GAS LINE LIGHT '>y UTILITY POLE TP O EXTERIOR LIGHTS LOT C BUILDINGS PARIONG S.F. f� GE MAX. R COVERAGE 17,950 29.3 30 27.840 45.5 SUBTOTAL 45,790 74.8 80 ACCESS DRIVES OPEN SPACE 2,525 4.1 IZO25 21.1 SUBTOTAL 15,450 25.2 TOTAL AREA 61.240 100 DOREMUS ASSOCIATES ACI'ORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW WATERFRONT PLACE ONE TWELVE LAKE STREET BURLINGTON, VT On401 (80L.) 86:3-9603 (FAX) 658-5685 PETER M. DOREMUS STEVF.NJ. KANTOR MARK A. CROW` MATTHFW T. DALY 'ALso AllMITTED IN CA Mr. Joseph Weith City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sherwin-Williams Plaza Dear Joe: October 18, 1994 LEGAL ASSISTANT MARY A. HUTTENLOCK Enclosed are revised site plans reflecting changes you and Ray called for. Please give me a call to discuss if you note any problems. Otherwise, I will see you October 25. Thanks. Very truly yours, xffo; 0'. .4 P �— Matthew T. Daly MTD/da Enc. cc: Stu Baraw Ken Stone M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files From: Raymond J. Belairt ing and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, October 25, 1994 agenda items Date: October 12, 1994 EUGENE LECLAIR - 2 LOT SUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLAN --- sketch plan submitted is acceptable. The final plat plan should comply with all the requirements of Section 202 of the subdivision regulations. The following additional information should also be shown: --- all existing structures on the property. --- existing and proposed driveways. --- limits of Conservation and Open Space District. LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP - NOWLAND II REVISION - SKETCH PLAN --- sketch plan submitted is acceptable. BRAD RABINOWITZ - SITE REVISIONS - SITE PLAN --- the westerly most row of parking has 10 spaces, plan shows only 9 spaces. Plan should be revised to accurately depict proposed conditions. --- provide revised building coverage information due to increased building footprint. --- dumpster must be placed inside the enclosure. DOREMUS ASSOCIATES - SITE REVISIONS - SITE PLAN --- the site has 10 parking spaces along the central row of parking located between the building and Shelburne Road and the plan shows only eight spaces at this location. --- plan should show a screened dumpster storage area similar to the approved plan. --- plan should show locations of all exterior lighting fixtures. --- the $750 worth of landscaping required as part of the 8/11/92 approval was never planted. --- the westerly most parking space on the site along the northerly boundary is too narrow to meet the nine (9) foot width requirement. Plan should not indicate that this is a parking space and the note indicating 62 spaces should be revised to indicate 61 spaces. 5btlt-PA /111�1 �-xO3 ;GAS 21.143 YARL )REAR - A yard on the same It with a principal building between the rear line of the building and the rear line of the lot extending the full width of the lot. 21.144 YARD, SIDE - A yard situated between the principal building and a side line and extending from the front yard to the rear side line shall be measured from the building to the nearest point on the side line. 4 21.145 BASE FLOOD - The flood having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. 21.146 MANUFACTURED HOME - means a structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities. For flood plain management purposes the term "manufactured home" also includes park trailers, travel trailers, and other similar vehicles placed on a site for greater than 180 consecutive days. For insurance purposes the term "manufactured home" does not include park trailers, travel trailers, and other similar vehicles. 21.147 REGULATORY FLOODWAY - means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than a designated height. 21. 148 SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT - means any repair, -- - ->- - -- reconstruction, or improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure either, (a) before the improvement or repair is started. or (b) if the structure has been damaged and is being restored, before the damage occurred. For the purposes of this definition "substantial improvement" is considered to occur when the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of the building commences, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the structure. The term does not, however, include either (1) any project for improvement of a structure to comply with existing state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications 81 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 12, 1994 Matthew T. Daly, Esquire Doremus Associates 112 Lake Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Site Revisions, 370 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Daly: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich and myself. Please respond to these comments, if appropriate, with revised plans and/or additional information no later than Tuesday, October 18, 1994. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sin ely, J�-A' Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 November 4, 1993 Matt Daley, Esquire Doremus Associates 112 Lake Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 370 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Daley: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This letter is in response to your request for some history on overall lot coverage at 370 Shelburne Road: 1. On August 8, 1983 the Zoning Board of Adjustment granted a variance for a 24'x60' addition to a noncomplying structure and a proposed lot coverage of 71% (see enclosed minutes). 2. On September 20, 1983 the Planning Commission approved a site plan with an overall lot coverage of 71% (minutes enclosed). The motion of approval refers to a plan revised 9/19/83. This plan has 55 spaces and is the plan referred to in paragraph #2 of these minutes which indicates that the plan with 55 spaces has a lot coverage of "about 70%". 3. The original site plan submitted for the restaurant in 1992 was the same site plan approved on 9/20/83 but it had an overall coverage, according to Eric Farrell, of approximately 83%. Since it didn't make sense to me how this plan could be 83% and the identical plan approved in 1983 was 71%, I carefully calculated the coverage of the plan approved in 1983. I discovered that the coverage on that plan was 80.4%. Apparently staff took the applicant's word that it was 71% and did not check the calculations. Matt Daley, Esquire 370 Shelburne Road November 2, 1993 Page 2 When this discrepancy was found, we decided that it as not fair to hold the applicant to the 71% since the Planning Commission did approve a plan showing 80.4% coverage, albeit unknowingly. The Planning Commission then approved the current plan on 8/11/92 with an overall coverage of 80%. Should you need further clarification on this matter, please let me know. Since ly, Ra d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp Preliminary Memorandum October 25, 1994 agenda items October 7, 1994 Page 2 BROWN ANIMAL HOSPITAL - CALKINS COURT As built plans prepared by Brad Rabinowitz Architect are acceptable. SHERWIN WILLIAMS PLAZA - SHELBURNE STREET As built plans prepared by Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary dated 9/9/94 are acceptable. K. k D. YANDOW N/F FLYNN AVENUE PARI20 N/F G. k S. PAGE N/F NOTE WFORMA710N ON METES AND BOUNDS AND UTILIIrES WAS TAKEN FROM PLAT OF LAND OF WY It JANE FARREL• 370 SHELBURNE ROAD, BURLINGTON k $0. BURLINGTON. Vr. DATED 10/21/50 BY TRUDE.L CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. RECEIVED S E P 3 0 1994 EXECUTIVE SQUARE ASSOCIATES City of So. Burlington OWN= R: EVERGREEN INYESTMENT. INC. C/O DCREAIUS ASSOCIATES 112 LAKE STREET BURUNGTON. VT 05401 APPLICANT: DOREMUS ASSOCIATES 112 LAKE STREET BURLINGTON. VT 05401 U,1 N. N 777B'0TWOOD, N 775-4'28' W B U R I�I—_--_—.—SOU TH BURLI NG T0N 5647 (3)BUTAL TALCRABAPPLES BERR110-12' SPREAD LRAC12' TALL 3' 0.C., J'-4' TALL \ . JUNI?E?. . _ ... 10 STEM - y4 . . G I CLUMPT JUNIPERS AMEUNCHIER \88RBF� �18• HICFI e�`--�• CURIP UNCHIER "TALL 8 CALLIPER A. k T. HUBBELL N N/ ; 'e Y NO (02SPAM) G F _ SHERWIN WILLIAMS PLAZA I ((J) ANI P CORKTRIMS B a 8 GUPER. 1 K HIGH BARBERRY AAMELAANCHER GARAOE W Ir Z NOOSE ;J-UNIPFR DAYLAUES N AC= • I BAYuuEs I I AaIAELANCN�R (7) ORNAMENTAL CRABAPPLES LATEID, CALIPENLILAO1D tz' SPREAD12' TALLWN u) S 7248'08' E LA1wW..91DEN'At)E ........ �....... e b.l. ti u• -- -- _ 4• S1FIl- S- - - - _ _ 10' V._. :... w PROCTOR AVENUE . �........ I • I I I I i �. .� �. �. LARKIN D. TAFT k M. k ,L COVFFi G ROTEIL NE M.L ` I f N/F N/F N/F N/F GRAPHIC SCALE IN rEr7 1 Ta.D - ED It EUZADETH LUND HOME INC NA LOCATION MAP NT'_' CFESCFNi C 7 FLYNN A" B_U FERGUSON I ROCTOR AYE. I LrMAN I I WTWTE P ii -'' SCAR A I N PROPERTY LINE CURB STORM LINE W/BASIN AND MANHOLE CD— _ _ SANITARY SEWER LINE W/ MANHOLE . , w • WATER ONE WITH GATE VALVE AND HYDRANT — G GAS LINE LIGHT m UTILITY POLE BUILDINGS PARKING S.F. X COVERAGE MAX. x COVERAGE 17,950 29.3 30 27.840 4&5 SUBTOTAL 45,790 74.13 80 ACCESS DRIVES OPEN SPACE 2,525 4.1 12.225 21.1 SUBTOTAL 15.450 25.2 TOTAL AREA 61,240 10 'Burlington .fire 19evttr. )rnt 575 11nrset street 1 #uutb igurlingtnn, Vermont 05403 (802) 658-7960 TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: Wallace Possich, Fire Chief UR DATE: October 5, 1994 RE: Plans Review for October 25, 1994 Meeting I have reviewed the following plans and my comments are attached: 1. Sherwin Williams P1azd Project No. 94803 370 Shelburne Rd. Dated 9-30-94 Acceptable 2. Nowland Two Project No. 92045 Dated 9-30-94 Acceptable 3. Brown Animal Hospital Calkins Ct. Dated 9-30-94 Acceptable 4. Former Arbie's Restaurant Project No. 7167 Williston Rd. Dated 9-28-94 Site.Plan Acceptable; however the building will not accommddate an occupancy load of 150. For assembly areas with tables and chairs code.requirements would allow for 15 sq. ft. per.person. After deducting bar space, storage, restrooms, etc. the occupancy load will .be well below 100. Labor & Industry can advise after review of building plans. S. 110 Kirby Rd. Dated 9-26-94 Acceptable 6. Green Acres Industrial Park Projrct No. 86091-56 Hinesburg Rd. - Acceptable Dated 10-4-94 7. Southland Project No. 92085 Shelburne Rd. Dated.4-19-93 Two additional hydrants are recommended to be located at west ends of buildings 'A' and 'C' (at corners), especially if these b *ld' are to be sprinklered. Also Fire Lanes will be required. Oterwi e accepta e. � � 0 DOREMUS ASSOCIATES A'1701LNF.YS AND COUNSELLORS XI'LAW WATERFRONT PLACE ONE TWELVE LAKE STREET BURLINGTON, V'I' 0.5401 (�tu_) asGa-s)G�rt (FAX) 658-5685 PETER M. DOREMUS STF.VENJ. KANTOR NI,1RK A. CROW MATrUFW T. DALY `ALS() ADMITTED IN CA October 7, 1994 Mr. Joseph Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dor set Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sherwin-Williams Plaza Dear Joe: LEGAL ASSISTANT MARY A. HUTTENI.00K When you get a chance would you please send me confirmation of our time before the Planning Commission October 25, 1994 with respect to the above -referenced property. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Thank you. Very truly yours, of Matthew T. Daly MTD/da cc: Stuart Baraw DOREMUS ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW WATERFRONT PLACE ONE'1'WEINE LAKE STREET BURLINGTON, VT O 4-01 pto�) scs-:x:os (FAX) wnm-5mm PETER M. DOREMUS STEVENJ. KANTOR MARK A. CROW* MATTIIF:W T. DALY 'Aj.so Aowrrri•:u iN CA Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington South Burlington, VT 05403 LEGAL ASSISTANT MAI4Y A. I I U'ITI:N LOC K February 17, 1994 Re: Sherman Williams Plaza at 370 Shelburne Road Dear Joe: You and I met late last year to discuss coverage requirements regarding the above -referenced property. I represent Evergreen Investments, the record owner of said property. I am writing to ask you to schedule some time to meet with me to discuss the coverage requirements and to explore resolving this matter once and for all. I will give you a call sometime next week to schedule a meeting. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, M�ew;4.7Dal��y MTD/ca cc: Stuart Baraw DOREMUS ASSOCIATES ATPORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW WMERFRONT PLACE. ONE TWELVE. LAKE. STREET IIIJRLINGTON, VC 05401 (FAX) cat- ,tat PETER M. DOREMUS STEVEN J. K WFOR MARK A. CHOW MATTAEW T. DALY •At.So Aurrr=,i) iN CA Mr. Raymond J. Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 370 Shelburne Road Dear Ray: LEGAL ASSISTANT MWY A. 111 WE NLOC K November 3, 1993 As we discussed on the telephone yesterday, you intend to send me a letter detailing the City's coverage requirements for the above -referenced property. As I told you, the materials in my file indicate that there is quite a discrepancy concerning the coverage requirements. Some documents from your office indicate 70% while others indicate 80%, while even others indicate levels in between those two amounts. Please give me the definitive requirement so that my client may respond accordingly. As I told you and Dick Ward in our meeting October 25th, Evergreen Investments wishes to resolve this matter in a reasonable fashion. It is difficult to explore options to resolve this matter when we are not quite sure what the coverage requirement is. Thank you for your attention to this request. I look forward to receiving your letter so that we may begin addressing the City's concerns. Very truly yours, Matthew T. Daly MTD/da cc: Stu Baraw City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 11, 1993 Eric F. Farrell Coburn & Feeley P.O. Box 923 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Restaurant, 370 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Farrell: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 L Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact & Decision on the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. in erely, ee J e Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: Anthony Gamache 8/11/92 JW MOTION OF APPROVAL GAMACHE - RESTAURANT I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Anthony Gamache for change of use of 1,850 square feet within an existing retail center to a 36 seat restaurant as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan, 370 Shelburne Road", dated 9/19/83, last revised 8/4/92, with the following stipulations: 1. The applicant shall post a $750, 3-year landscaping bond prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 2. Any new lighting shall be downcasting, shielded luminaire and shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. �X. The zoning/building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. \ � r L. PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 November 18, 1992 Eric F. Farrell Coburn & Feeley - P.O. Box 923 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Restaurant, 370 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Farrell: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the August 11, 1992 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval and the requirement that the zoning/building permit be obtained within six (6) months from the date of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si erely, oe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: Anthony Gamache City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 30, 1992 Eric F. Farrell Coburn & Feeley P.O. Box 923 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Restaurant, 370 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Farrell: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary commets on the above application from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire _Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please submit additional information requested and/or revised plans no later than Tuesday, August 4, 1992. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincere , ffnJ. Z,l 4L Ym Ra elair Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp cc: Anthony Gamache Memorandum - Planning August 11, 1992 agenda items August 7, 1992 Page 2 Landscaping: The landscaping requirement for the 80 multi -family units is $52,700. The landscaping proposed amounts to $41,666, a shortfall of $11,034. The 1988 approval required a landscaping bond of $85,000 for the multi -family units. Records indicate that a $19,000 bond was posted and subsequently released. The remaining $66,000 amount should be reduced to $52,700. Sewer: The sewer allocation on 4/2/92 was reduced to 81,150 gpd. The reduction of this project by 10 units would reduce the allocation by 4500 gpd for a total allocation of 76,650 gpd. Other• --- note #5 on sheet 1 indicates that buildings designated by shading, buildings on the plan. --- buildings are numbered 1 through buildings on the plan. this proposal involves 18 staff counts 22 shaded 30 but there are only 28 5) ANTHONY GAMACHE - RESTAURANT - 370 SHELBURNE ROAD This project consists of converting 1850 square feet of retail space to a 36 seat restaurant. There will be no exterior changes to the building. This property located at 370 Shelburne Road A within the Cl District. It is bounded on the south by Proctor Avenue, on the east by a single family home, on the west by Shelburne Road and on the north by a large office building. Access/circulation: foot curb cut on Shelburne Road at a is proposed. Access is currently being provided by a 20 Proctor Avenue and a 30 foot curb cut on signalized intersection. No change in access Circulation is adequate. 2 Memorandum - Planning August 11, 1992 agenda items August 7, 1992 Page 3 Coveraqe/setbacks: Building coverage is 31.9% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 80% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 71.4% (maximum allowed is 30%). The current proposal will not increase the degree of nonconformance for coverage. The building does not meet the side and rear yard setback requirements. It is therefore a noncomplying structure and this proposal will not increase its degree of nonconformity. Traffic: Shelburne Road is in the City of Burlington at this location. Enclosed is a letter from Donald Morley indicating that he foresees no adverse traffic safety or congestion from this project. This property is also in Traffic Overlay Zone 5 which allows this property to generate a maximum of 69 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. I.T.E. estimates this Specialty Retail Center to generate 81 vte's. The proposed change in use will not increase trip ends because the definition of a Specialty Retail Center in the I.T.E. manual includes a small restaurant (see enclosed letter from Joseph Oppenlander). Sewer: This building is connected to the Burlington sewage system. Enclosed is a letter from Donald Morley indicating that there is sufficient sewage and water capacity for the proposed use. Landscaping: The landscaping requirement for this project is $750 which is being met. Plantings will include a cedar hedge to screen the dumpster and some Upright Yews adjacent to Shelburne Road. Lighting: No additional exterior lighting proposed. Dumpster: The dumpster will be screened from the northerly and easterly properties by a cedar hedge. Parking: The proposed restaurant and the existing retail space requires a total of 59 parking spaces and the plan shows 61 spaces including two (2) handicapped spaces. 3 8 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 7, 1992 Eric F. Farrell Coburn & Feeley P.O. Box 923 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Restaurant, 370 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Farrell: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, August 11, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. inc rely, e Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp cc: Anthony Gamache r•. T iL lu T II A OL) --A-,PHALT HAVI 4 j7mkr WAUK pEMOKep ts 40 b. .4' -4 Aleut wA6M& L4cAY70A/ 10 sands'Nt' AV, PftA Aw& IAA 74. t] ch 4. 6. A7 72. rT r T D A d. UP-LI&HT OVERALL COVLe,<466, 80% (2'/12 --AU FPf2� 1'>. r-O L-r- - 1. Wr 9. "7UN?A1M A,W (21! e�6LI FWQJ - & G. W^" Wt;.- 1-Icri-rr P,A M,- $--I Al LIZ Rev RECEIVED AUG 0 4 1992 City of -So. Burlington COMMISSION Tom Racine, Chair Ellen Leff, Vice Chair Virginia Winn William Neilsen Ted Mead William Hauke, Jr. Robert Albany INTERIM DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS & CITY ENGINEER Steven Goodkind, P.E. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER Donald Morley FINANCE MANAGER Patrick J. Buteau July l5, 1992 aQOQHg�o� PUBLIC WORKS Working together for Burlington Mr. Eric r'arrell Coburn & Feeley 125 College St./P O Box 923 Burlington, VT 05401 RE: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS PLAZA Dear Mr. Farrell: STREET DIVISION Jerry Tomlinson TRAFFIC DIVISION Norm Baldwin CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INSPECTION SERVICES DIVISION Scott Corse, P.E. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION Dan Bennett WASTEWATER & SOLID WASTE DIV. Thomas E. Moreau WATER DIVISION Laurie Adams Concerning the above project which is proposed to convert 1850 SF retail to a 36 seat restaurant, please be advised of the following: 1. We foresee no adverse traffic safety or congestion from this project. 2. There is sufficient sewage and water capacity at this location. 3. The sewer impact fee is $5.20 per gallon times 30 gallons times 36 seats less current usage. The fee is payable to Public Works (John Rasys). Kindly call if you have questions. laic erely, r L F. Morley Transportation Engineer llFM/lh:ltrs CC: John Rasys Tom Moreau Steve Roy P.O. BOX 849 • BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0849 • (802) 863-9094 (T.D.D.) • (802) 863-0466 FAX Printed On Recycled Paper 0 TRANS/OP INC. July 6, 1992 Mr Eric.-F. Farrell Coburn & Feeley Real 125 College Street Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. Farrell: P.O. Box 29, Route 2A Williston, Vermont 05495 Estate 05401 (802) 878-5977 S76 In regard to the commercial project identified as 3-&-t Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont, this business activity has been described as a Specialty Retail Center, ITE Land Use Code 814. This type of retail operation is described in the Institute of Transportation Engineers publication entitled Trip Generation, 1991, as -follows: "Specialty retail Centers are generally small strip shopping centers containing a variety of retail shops, specializing in quality apparel, hard goods, services such as real estate offices, dance studios, or florists, and small restaurants." The change of 1850 sq ft from a medical supplies store (quality apparel and/or hard goods) to a small restaurant (noon -time business) still retains the types of activities that are associated with a specialty retail center. A specialty retail center, like a shopping center, is an example of a multi -use development, to which some trips are made for more than one purpose. Therefore, trip generation rates for these land -use activities account for multi -stop trips, and development traffic should not be determined as the summation of individual uses within the center. Because the new land use falls within the definition of a specialty retail center and because this type of commercial activity is defined as a single entity for purposes of trip generation, then no change in development traffic would result in the application of the published trip generation rates for no alteration in the size of the specialty retail center. Please advise of any additional information that may be requires. Thank you. Very truly yours, Joseph C. Oppenlander, P.E. Vice -President JCO : nj k August 4, 1992 REAL ESTATE INC. Mr. Ray Belair Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator City Of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sherwin-Williams Plaza, 370 Shelburne Street Dear Ray, The restaurant improvements will cost approximately $25,000, exclusive of furniture, fixtures and equipment. At 3.0% times, the landscaping requirement would be $750.00. We are proposing eight 4' - 5' Cedar Trees to screen around the dumpster area, as shown on the plan and three Upright Yews (3" spread) adjacent to the Shelburne Road curb cut. No changes to the exterior lighting are planned. Call if you need to know more. Sincerely Yours, Eric F. Farrell CC: Evergreen Investments, Limited, Owner Anthony P. Gamache, Appiicant The Wells -Richardson Building P.O. Box 923, 125 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05402 802-658-6666 Residential • Commercial • Business Brokers Property Management • Development August 4, 1992 REAL F S TA T E INC. Mr. Ray Belair Assistant Planning & zoning Administrator City Of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sherwin-Williams Plaza, 370 Shelburne Street Dear Ray, The restaurant improvements will cost approximately $25,000, exclusive of furniture, fixtures and equipment. At 3.0% times, the landscaping requirement would be $750.00. We are proposing eight 4' - 5' Cedar Trees to screen around the dumpster area, as shown on the plan and three Upright Yews (3" spread) adjacent to the Shelburne Road curb cut. No changes to the exterior lighting are planned. Call if you need to know more. Sincerely Yours, Eric F. Farrell CC: Evergreen Investments, Limited, Owner Anthony P. Gamache, Applicant The Wells -Richardson Building P.O. box 923, 125 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05402 802-658-6666 Pesident;al • Conuturdal • $usinesc trokets ftpem• Manayemeut • Ue�rloptttrnt August 4, 1992 R E A L E S T A T E I N C. Mr. Ray Belair Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator City Of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sherwin-Williams Plaza, 370 Shelburne Street Dear Ray, Per your request, here are five Site Plans, revised 8/4/92 to show the existing conditions, with the following modifications we propose: ... removal of paved parking area at the northeast corner of the property ... four less parking spaces along the north property line ... removal of the two rocks along the north property line ... additional planting adjacent to the Shelburne Street curb cut ... two additional parking spaces north of the building ... identified the dumpster location with new screening to be added ... plantings north of the building now shown By my calculation, the total lot coverage, as depicted, is now approximately 80.0% and the total number of parking spaces is 61. Although we are showing the removal of pavement and parking in an effort to be in compliance with the plan that was approved back in 1983 under different ownership, I respectfully request an opportunity to discuss with the Commission our belief that such removal will not provide the center or the community any real benefit. Please call me if you need any additional information prior to the meeting on August 1 lth. Thank you for your cooperation and understanding. Sincerely yours, Eric F. Farrell CC: Evergreen Investments Limited, Owner Anthony P. Gamache, Applicant The Wells -Richardson Building P.O. Box 923, 125 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05402 802-658-6666 Residential • Commercial 0 Business Brokers Property Management 0 Development e ANTHONY GAMACHE - RESTAURANT - 370 SHELBURNE ROAD --- plan does not show plantings along north side of building but does show plantings on the north side of Shelburne Road access which do not exist. --- dumpster must be shown and must be screened. --- if the space with the two ( 2 ) rocks is, to be counted as an existing space, these rocks must be removed. --- provide cost estimate to fit -up space for restaurant. --- site plan submitted will increase coverage by 2.9% over the plan approved by the Planning Commission in 1983, either the plan will have to be revised to not exceed the approved coverage or obtain a variance. --- indicate any changes to exterior lighting if any. 5 8/11/92 JW MOTION OF APPROVAL GAMACHE - RESTAURANT I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Anthony Gamache for change of use of 1,850 square feet within an existing retail center to a 36 seat restaurant as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan, 370 Shelburne Road", dated 9/19/83, last revised 8/4/92, with the following stipulations: 1. The applicant shall post a $750, 3-year landscaping bond prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 2. Any new lighting shall be downcasting, shielded luminaire and shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. y-3. The zoning/building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. 3 . /Is Y M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: August 11, 1992 Preliminary Comments Date: July 16, 1992 SHERWIN WILLIAMS BUILDING, PROCTOR AVENUE, SHELBURNE ROAD Site plan with latest revision dated July 13, 1992 is acceptable. GREEN TREE PARK, I.C.V. LOT SHUNPIKE ROAD (CORNER There exists a snow storage easement along the sidewalk side of Shunpike Road. This easement should be shown. Plantings within this easement should be avoided. VILLAGE OF DORSET PARK, DORSET STREET (BRAND FARM Plan with revision in numbers of units along the north side is acceptable. .7uutb )urltugtvu Nire Departutt ! 575 Barset ftect outl Nurlingtnn. Vermont 05403 }i 3 FAX: (802) 658-4748 (802) 658-7960 TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE RE: TUESDAY AUGUST 11,1992 AGENDA ITEMS DATE: WEDNESDAY JULY 15,1992 1. Sherwin/William Building 310 Shelburne Road Plan has been reviewed by this department and at.this time I do not see a problem for our department in given proper protection if needed. 2. The Village At Dorset Park Project #91073 At this time I do not see a problem the changes being made would effect us in given emergency protection. 3. 1-GREEN TREE PARK I.C.V. CORP. PROJECT # 92601 The only problem which needs to be corrected for emergency protection is due to the size of the building 1-hydrant must be installed at the location marked on the plan by this office. No Text at a signalized intersection directly across from Baldwin Avenue. Traffic circulation on the site is acceptable. Coverage/Setbacks: Building coverage is 10.9% for both the original and alternate plan (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 69.5% for the original plan and 69.2% for the alternate plan (maximum allowed is 70%). Front is 30% for both plans yard coverage P (maximum allowed is 30%). The new building will meet setback requirements on both plans. Landscaping: The landscaping requirement for this project is $12,900 which will be met by both plans. Plantings on the original plan will include Sugar Maple, Littleleaf Linden, Russian Olive, Paper Birch and Sargent Juniper. Plantings on the alternate plan will include Sugar Maple, Redmond Linden, Allegany Serviceberry, Paper Birch and Sargent Juniper. Staff recommends that maples be planted along the Shelburne Road R.O.W. on the south side of the driveway as is proposed/ on the north side. �V Parkinq: The existing facility requires 27 parking spaces and the proposed facility requires 25 parking spaces. These required spaces are being provided including five (5 handicapped spaces. A total of 375 parking spaces are being proposed for the entire site on the original plan and 374 spaces on the alternate plan. The two (2) parking spaces along Shelburne Road which the applicant agreed to eliminate at sketch plan are not being eliminated on either plan. C.O. Zone: The original plan shows the piping and filling of the watercourse along the south boundary. The Natural Resources Committee visited the site with this plan in mind and submitted written comments (see enclosed memo). The alternate plan will not encroach any further into the C.O. zone than currently exists and the watercourses will be left undisturbed. Staff concurs with the recommendations of the Natural ! Resources Committee. The watercourse meets the definition of \ minor stream as provided in the zoning regulations, and in staff 's opinion meets the spirit of the original intent of the CO District. Therefore, the watercourse should be protected and the requirements of the CO District maintained. Traffic: This property is in Traffic Overlay Zone 4 which would allow this property to generate a total of 155.7 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. The trip 3- F TRANSMITTAL ) COLIN ) LINDBERG ARCHITECT 120 Lake St • Burlington, Vermont05401 LETTER 802-804-4950 802-863-5790 PROJECT: 370 Shelburne Road ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 328 1 , DATE: September 19, 1983 Mr. Richard Ward ' TO: If enclosures are not as noted, please inform us immediately. If checked below, please: ATTN: ( ) Acknowledge receipt of enclosures. L Return enclosures to us.. „ WE TRANSMIT: (X) herewith e ( ) under separate cover via ( ) in accordance with your request FOR YOUR: ( ) approval ( ) distribution to parties ( ) information ( ) review & comment ( ) record (X)use ( ) THE FOLLOWING: Drawings ( ) Shop Drawing Prints ( ) Samples ( ) Specifications ( ) Shop Drawing Reproducibles ( ) Product Literature ( ) Change Order (X) letters a COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 -9 13 8 1 9 14 83 Notice of Sufficient CaparjtV frnm Water Rpqnijrrpq 1 9/19/83 Letter from Street Department 2 Rev. 9/19/83 Site Plans 2 West Elevation 2 7/5/83 Main Floor Plan REMARKS COPIES TO: (with enclosures) El BY: Colin P. Lindberg, A.I.A. City of Burlington JAMES R. OGDEN PO. Box 849 SUPERINTENDENT Burlington, Vermont 05402 802/864-7428 RECEIVED SEP 1 9 1988 19 September 1983 Colin P. Lindberg, Architect 120 Lake Street Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Colin,. The additional three toilets in the proposed Sherwin Williams project will have little if any effect on the capacity of the City sewer system. This de- partment therefgVe approves the connection of the toilets. Very truly yours, BURLINGTON STREET D PARTMENT r_� Brian L. Tuttle, Engineering Asst. BLT:jal u 0 I � CITY OF BURLINGTON, VT Water Superintendent Resources James Howley, P.E. NOTICE OF SUFFICIENT CAPACITY R 1,vL �;�D SSEP 1 5 1333 SoUTO 3u(u,�a yTO�1 TO: Re i.onal En i eer ILL: _ W_' LltM11C Agency of Xvironmental Cons vation 111 st Street E sex Jct., VT 05452 Date: T 11lll 6%3 - The referenced project can be supplied from water mains in the area, and its wastewater can be treated at our j--4rw wastewater treatment plant. Please note that this approval for municipal wastewater treatment capability does not include municipal wastewater collection sewer) capability. That review and approval is the jurisdiction of the Burlington Street Department. This approval is based on the following information, provided by Fire Service? f-,J. Comments: Total estimated demand s Aa01 vk WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT cc: Thomas Moreau, Wastewater Div. Thomas Atherton, Water Div. (� Plumbing Inspector Street Dept. Jai s Howley, Superi endent Project Owner or Representative Water Resources Dept. File Mr. Gary Farrell City of Burlington -City Hall -Post Office Box 878 • Burlington, Vermont • 05402 8021863-4501 Commieaionera TORREY C. CARPENTER, Chairman ROBERT S. MACLELLAN, Vice Chairman JOHN E. HAYES FREDERICK J. BAILEY THOMAS J. CROSBY 1 ,�►►Oyl3U.I�y�ta. ,Jd `sae �e Y a BURLINGTON TRAFFIC COMMISSION 72 SOUTH WINOOSKI AVENUE BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 802 - $63 - 6351 Mr. Colin Lindberg 120 Lake Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 September 13, 1983 Re: 370 Shelburne Street Dear Mr. Lindberg: DONALD F. MORLEY, Superintendent RECEIVED SEP 1 5 1989 It is my understanding that you are involved in the design for remodeling the Sherwin-Williams storg at the above address. The store, presently about 16,000 square feet, will have about 1,400 square feet added and be split into five low--traffic-volume stores. On -site parking is to be reduced somewhat to add land- scaping. One curb -cut on Shelburne Street will be closed. Based upon my understanding, I do not foresee any significant traffic safety or congestion problems arising here. Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention. S cerely, Donald F. Morley, Superintendent DFM/cjs copy: R. Kamerbeek Mr. Gary Farrell "�pTES POST; / to � 'f C � W T C Z o n u&MAIL m United States Postal Service Burlington, Vermont 05►+O1-9998 September 9, 1983 Mr. Gary Farrell Manager Sheraton Inn 870 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401-5715 Re: South Burlington, Vermont - Finance Station Dear Mr. Farrell: As per our telephone conversation this date I subnd.t the following: FUNCTIONS Full line of postal services; DELIVERY ACTIVITIES All delivery emanating from this office will be by post office boxes and general delivery; EMPLOYEES Two PARKING Employees - 2 Customers - 6 POST OFFICE BOXES 308 - estimate to be used by businesses: 1010 - 150 Reviewing the list of boxholders at the White Street Branch, to my knowledge, no business is from the Shelburne Road area. The box holders at the Main Office, I would estimate at approximately fifteen (15) from the Shelburne Road area. Deliver y of mail from the Main Office to this station will be twice a day - one in the A. M. (7:00), and one in the P. M. (2:00). Pick up of outgoing mail will be after closing hours. R I hope this covers all points we have discussed, and please feel free to call any time if other information is needed. t Sincere y, Rl chard J. Greenough Postal Operations Analyst (Acting) FOR: Michael J. Shinay MSC Manager/Postmaster RJG:MJS:h TRANS/OP INC. SYSTEMS ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS P. O. BOX 2304 - SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 Phone (802) 878-5977 September 2, 1983 Mr. Richard R. Ward Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Mr. Ward: In response to your request, a traffic overview has been performed for the proposed commercial development that is identified as 307 Shelburne Road. The following items are provided or suggested for your purposes. 1. Traffic volumes generated for a retail land -use classification of Speciality Retail Stores are provided in the attached Table 1 for morning and afternoon peak hours of street traffic and for a 24- hour period. These values are indicative of average travel conditions. 2. The driveway on Shelburne Road should be directly alined with Flynn Avenue to provide for proper geometrics and traffic flow at this intersection. The storage portion of the Shelburne Road driveway should be increased in length to decrease the probability of vehicle spillback onto Shelburne Road during peak times. This proper length of reservoir storage is essential for efficient and safe operation of this main driveway by both entering and exiting traffic. To accomplish this feature, a redesign of this portion of the parking lot is required. 3. Although 13 parking stalls are provided for compact -type vehicles, it is difficult to achieve this parking compliance in self -parking locations, such as a commercial development. All parking stalls should be designed to accommodate standard -sized passenger cars. 4. A redesign of the parking area is essential to accommodate properly the movement of passenger cars and to allow for deliveries by semi- trailer trucks. These features include aisle widths, internal and external driveway widths, and curb -return radii. An unsatisfactory design does exist at the driveway situated at Proctor Avenue. A detailed design of this parking facility should be developed in consultation with an individual qualified in traffic engineering. 5. A traffic performance evaluation for design -hour conditions should be performed for the intersection of Shelburne Road, Flynn Avenue, and the main driveway to determine proper traffic signal phasings and timings for morning and afternoon peak periods and for off- peak periods. TABLE 1 E 370 Shelburne Road Development Trip Generation Land -use classification - ITE 814, Speciality Retail Center Gross area - 15,055 sq ft Traffic Rate-trips/1000 sq ft Period Enter Exit Total ADT - - 40.7 a.m. peak 1.99 - - p.m. peak 2.25 - - Actual for 15,055 sq ft Enter Exit Total 306 306 612 30 30 60 34 34 68 3 Please advise of any detailed analyses and/or designs that may be required to provide for efficient and safe traffic movements with respect to this proposed commercial development. Thank you. Very truly yours, n Joseph C. Oppenlander, P.E. Vice -President JCO:njk M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 9/1/83 1) Bourdeau-Rye Property, Hinesburg Road 1. There should be at least 5 feet distance between any paved area and property line. This is mainly to provide an area for snow storage and construction of a drainage swale to prevent runoff on to adjacent property. 2. The south-west corner'of parcel "B" should be located outside of main entrance. 3. An area for boat and trailer parking should be designated. 4. A sidewalk along Hinesburg Road should be included. 5) Farrell Property, 370 Shelburne Road (Corner Proctor Avenue) 1. This property is served by the Burlington sewer system. They should be notified to see if their system can accommodate the increase in sewage discharge. 6) Ethan Allen Farm 1. Road shall include side ditches to carry runoff from intersection of Poor Farm Road northerly. 2. Watermain in private road shall be extended across entire frontag of develop- ment. 3. Builders and buyers shall be made aware of the potential noise problem. 4) Valley Ridge, (College Woods), Patchen Road 1. I have reviewed the changes for this project and find them to be acceptable. 9/l/83 MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission grant site plan approval for the application of Gary Farrell for conversion of the existing Sherwin-Williams, 370 Shelburne Road into five retail shops as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan, 370 Shelburne Road" dated August 11, 1983, with the following stip- ulations: 1. That the most southerly curb cut along Shelburne Road be closed , according to State Highway standards. 2. That sewage increase into the Burlington system be accepted by the City, that a letter be filed with the City Engineer confirming acceptance. 3. A performance bond for landscaping in the amount of $8,000 and $1,000 for curb closing be posted with the City prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. This approval expires in 6 months. Memorandum Next week's agenda items 8/31/83 3) Indian Creek pool Landscaping plan is designed to screen the proposed tennis court and swimming pool. Should the Planning Commission consider approval of the plan a bond for the total worth (not yet determined) should be posted with the City. No additional comments. 4) Valley Ridge, former College Woods Applicant has started site improvements. A ,few minor revisions involving grading changes and combining four (4) single family units into duplexes are proposed. No problems with the amendments. Same approval motion (May 10, 1983) is suggested. 5) Farrell Proposed is the remodeling of the Sherwin-Williams building into five (5) retail shops. A 1400 square feet addition is proposed to the northerly end of the building. Zoning Board of Adjustment granted approval (7/25/83) to extend a non -conforming structure. Applicant proposes to close one curb cut off Shelburne Road (most southerly curb). Major entrance is located at a signalized intersection. Second access to parking area is off Proctor Avenue with a curb cut to the rear of the lot for delivery trucks. Parking: minimum of 1 space per 100 square feet of retail floor, minimum required 98, proposed 6-a spaces. Lot coverage, parking and building 71% (Variance granted for addtional 1%). Traffic: comments are expected before Tuesday's meeting from Mr. Oppenlander. 6) Ethan Allen Farm, Mr. John Belter Lot layout is okay, no problems. See Bill Szymanski's memo regarding engineering aspects. September 22, 1983 City of Burlington Planning Department City Hail Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Randy: This letter will confirm our conversation regarding the renovation and addition to the existing Sherwin-Williams buildings on Shelburne Road. The South Burli"ton Planning Commission approved the site plan on Tuesday, September 20, 1963. Because that ration of Shelburne Road is within your City limits, it was suggested that you might require approval. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Sincerely, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer l /mcg T III A5PHALT RAVIW-i WALK op ytt — C. b r>Z T --r Kcvis'c� — &3 s .7 'x / 'q (/,,v,-c Z 14 - Rcv. 4F TWLY 92 r_. RECEIVE[ JUL 15 1992 City of So. Burlingt, 9,44 /f' L i (b S�A&K 9X/8 J �, l��S•PAG� t ft.G �.��r�h�V 771 1. ct � r ,rr I r1 -_� .I / J d-l Ul L A N I✓ :: A �' N L t L `I' L I '� HT I I- i Gr c7 G E --4 E c.>LI ! 0 a, OP-LI&HT �. Mr�t_�NT�1N G.� N �2'" c.�U p�q}-.�._._._._._ g• �. Wat,.t,. MTd LIG.�" July 21, 1992 Mr. Ray Belair Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator City Of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sherwin-Williams Plaza, 370 Shelburne Street Dear Ray, REAL ESTATE I NC. Enclosed please find a copy of a self-explanatory letter to me from Mr. Donald F. Morley, City of Burlington Transportation Engineer, for your use in connection with the Anthony P. Gamache application for a restaurant use at this location. Sincerely Yours, �H a. Eric Farrell Enc. CC: Evergreen Investments Limited, Owner Anthony P. Gamache, Applicant The Wells -Richardson Building P.O. Box 923, 125 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05402 802-658-6666 Residential • Commercial 0 Business Brokers Property Management 0 Development -- N, li.� PWlNC3 l V, %64z- CI F' f'R Ew C Ncsw --�\ �nN WALK ! ` 1� I , / � I'� h•>i'►'NLi F�°+✓Ily sr `` -,> \� �.� .. K.�3 n` \ '` ' � ... _..--. 6 ..+i w..J..7Y'r".'. ,� , .�,.a♦ ` Ylrl a.� }J� P.1RhINCr � r`VI' f<F:: Ic:%B l ` t lu h b. rr "♦ r 4.^ s ! � l I! BSPn cES NE-w I r� Xvd i UT u e+4r I 1l• NBW I 1T1Tj-- UT0F' f�. _. --- LE+Nb��;At'l� �>;:NEtOl.1L� ��ry' LICsH11'NC•r GiGH>=pl_1L� �7-( I• +�c�e! 1_nr_uf,r14 CtLtf-144) -- 10 a. ul✓-LIErHT - 4 1AApi-o (z'1-2 S. Nlnt_Y ITAIN p 51 1 G. WALJ- MTD, LI6-1-ff - --.--- ----- '; sf, LJrMleHTYeW rAF=1—iH,; 1,63 REv/S6p — `3 9PgLE 6 9 X Je' i U U c;Ut,UUN Ie c�• sw L f 9z RECEIVED JUL 0 8 1§92 City of So. Burlington NCF<T4 Atrlq -3o trIP6 40 Lip f u v October 26, 1963 Mr. Gary Farrell Sheraton Burlington Inn 870 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Gary: Be advised that the Planning Comtnission has granted approval of your request to construct an addition at Sherwin 'Killiams to be occupied by a branch post office. Ibne of the prior stipulations were amended. before permits are issued those stipulations must be in cor%)Iiance and submitted to this office. If you have any questions please don't hesitate- to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zonina Administrative Officer P,W/Mcg October 25, 1983 page 5 hite Street for an addition of 500 square feet to an existi facility, as depicted on a plan entitled "White Street ce, the Merchants Bank," dated September 27, 1983 prepared teve Moore. with the following stipulations: 1) That a landscaping bond in the amount of $750.00 be posted prior to issuance of a building permit. 2) This approval expires in 6 months. Mrs. Maher seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. Continue discussion and site 21an review of Mr. Gary Farrell, construction of branch post office, Sherwin Williams buildings Mr. Poger noted that letters had been received from Hobert Mitchell and Donald Morley indicating that in their opinions the proposed facility would pose no problems with traffic in the area. Mr. Poger also noted that a letter from the City attorney, dated October 21, 1983, indicates that the Commission has the power to review traffic access even if it goes over boundary lines. Mr. Farrell said they have provided the information asked for and they don't foresee any problems since there is a light and since there is also a second access off Proctor Avenue. He added that they thought the service would be welcomed by people in the area who now have to travel to Burlington. Mr Ward said he had called Joe Openlander to do some`ttudies in the area, but he was not available and said it would take 3 or 4 weeks. Mr. Jacob then moved that in view of letters received the Com- mission approve the applicatinn of Gary Farrell as far as the post office facility is concerned. Mr. Belter seconded and e motion passed -0 with Mr. Mona abstaining as he did not feel TFe—traffic situation had beenIfully investigated des ite t e etters. Sketch plan review, two lot subdivision Trevithick property, 1777SPear Street Mr. Ward explained that the new lot will meet City standards. Mr. Poger asked what the access would be, and Mr. Trevithick said that one driveway would serve both lots. Mrs. Hurd asked whether the subdivision would render the back of the lot un- developable. Mr. Poger said it wouldn't as they could be given private access to Spear Street. Sketch Plan review of 57-lot subdivision, DuBois property Mr. Trudell explained that when they appeared before the joint Planning Commission/City Council meeting a number of recommen- dations had been made, and this revised plan is a result of that meeting. September 23, 1963 Mr. Gary carrell Sheraton Burlington Inn 870 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Gary: Be advised that the F-.auth Burlington Planning Cumiission has granted approval of your application to convert 370 Shelburne Road into five (5) retAil'sbops with the following stipulations; 1. That the most southerly curb cut along Shelburne Road is closed, accordirxj to State Highway standards. 2. That sewage increase, into the Burlington system be accepted by the City and that a letter be filed with the City Engineer confirming acceptance. 3. A performance bond for landscaping in the amount of $8,000 and $1,000 fo r curb closir.:i shall he posted with the City prior to is.,3uance of a building permit. 4. Should one of the tenants be the United States Post 0-fice or any other high traffic generator the developer shall inform the City administrative officer who will have a traffic analysis done for approval of the use by the Planning CoiTaission. 5. This approval expires in 6 months. Also be informed that after discussing your proposal with the City Attorney, he suggested that we inform. the Burlington officials of your proposal, in that they may want to review it, due to the fact that the Shelburne Road is within their City limits. very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RN/Mcg s C'ommiarioners BURLINGTON TRAFFIC COMMISSION 72 SOUTH WINOOSKI AVENUE TORREY C. CARPENTER, Chairman BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 ROBERT S. MACLELLAN, Vice Chairman 802 - 863 - 6351 DONALD F. MORLEY. Superintendent JOHN E. HAYES FREDERICK 1. BAILEY THOMAS J. CROSBY October 25, 1983., Mr. Colin Lindberg 120 Lake Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Lindberg: In regards to the proposed redeveluNtacnt of the Sherwin-Williams property in South Burlington, please be advised that I do not foresee any serious traffic congestion -problems 'should a branch post office be located there.. - Kindly contact me should you have any further concerns. incerely, Donald F. Morley, Superintendent DFM/cjs cc: Mr. Gary Farrell y �� 1 MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 10/21/83 2) Myers, Dorset and Swift Streets Existing lot (Myers homestead) contains 8.8 acres. Proposed lot contains 4.0 acres with 473 feet frontage on Dorset Street and 376 feet on Swift Street. Myers lot contains 4.8 acres with 744 feet frontage on Dorset Street. Proposed lot willbe used for a church. Myers lot to remain as is, single family dwell- ing. Proposed lot served by City water and sewer. Sewer to be extended along Swift Street and tap into line by Morman Church. No problems with this pro- posal. 4a) People's Express, Airport Complex Addition 36'x66' (modular unit) located to the south end of the main terminal. Because of overcrowding conditions a hold room and check -in counter is requested. The only issue is landscaping, parking and circulation will remain the same. Landscaping required would be in the area of $500 dollars, the landscaping as proposed are foundation plantings and are acceptable. Bond for $690 will be necessary. As a suggestion, the Airport Manager should have a work session with the Commission to discuss near and long range plans for the Airport Complex. 4b) Merchants Bank, 50 White Street Zoning Board of Adjustment granted a waiver, banks are non -conforming use with- in C-1 District. Addition located to the rear of building, does not affect the site. No improvements are required. Landscaping is only issue, an addition $750 in plantings are required. 5) Farrell, Sherwin Williams Post office will be a tenant. See City Attorney's comments. Traffic in- formation is expected from the applicant at the meeting. 6) Trevithick, 1751 Spear Street The area is zoned Residential l District. The minimum frontage requirement be- ing 170 feet. The existing lot contains five acres with 334 feet frontage. Zoning Board of Adjustment granted a waiver, the four acre lot will contain 164 feet frontage. I see no problems with this subdivision. City water is available, on site sewer is required. Design by an engineer is necessary prior to construction of a dwelling. r I BURL.INGTON PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICE 31 • CITY HALL BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 Telephone 802/658-9300 Ext. 155 October 18, 1983 } Mr. Colin P. Lindberg 120 Lake Street Burlington, VT 05401 Re: 370 Shelburne Street Dear Mr. Lindberg: This letter is in reference to the redevelopment of the properly now occupied by the Sherwin - Williams store at 370 Shelburne Street in �uuLh Burlington. The City of Burlington Planning Department has reviewed the proposed site' plan for this property and finds no problem of a planning nature with this proposal. It is understood that the Burlington Traffic Engineer is also reviewing the plan from a traffic viewpoint. If there is any additional information you need, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, �0�w7- Altz-4 4 Robert P. Mitchell Assistnat Director of Planning and Zoning RM:oet cc: Mr. Gary Farrell ,„ , Mr. Dick Ward 35n•mv' t-� RECEVI JUL 15 1994' New — City of. Sm Burk KEV,S.0 - !.3 SPgGE S 9�iAuC l L 1✓ l_ J R E%1. -TN L-Y 92 i fat— h R X $ I ►atit- I r fie. P. h i ncr ,u I� e. r . . - J.1 _I i LtiNt� ArE� H�iVL�Lr::; LI �HTIt1C-r cvGHEp(_' i • F ic�E-* t-Ck�U �T" � �: G-N.L Ie&44 __ 10 c�. U1✓-LIGHT 2 F ri M�r�t e (Lt% 4AUF->r�J ,� �. �ol.t; LI61•t1"----..__.. �. Mr�r�iT.�ItiJ 1.yN tZ''c�L( Pal --- - - g G• WALL MrC? LIGl-r` - M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files From: Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments - August 11, 1992 agenda items Date: July 10, 1992 ICV OFFICE/WAREHOUSE - 21 GREGORY DRIVE --- provide breakdown of square footage of office use and warehouse use. --- for the warehouse use, provide number of n(:),;office employees and the number of company vehicles operating from the premises. --- site plan approval is valid for six (6) months with a six (6) month extension approval by the Planning Commission. If the applicant feels that phase 2 will not be constructed within one (1) year of approval, he should apply for a multi -phase project under Section 20.302 of the zoning regulations. The applicant should indicate the length of time being requested and provide the above information for both phases in addition to all other aspects of the project including costs, parking, landscaping, etc. Of --- indicate wattage and type Aexterior lights. --- if the site will have a dumpster, it should be shown and screened. --- landscaping is $14,980 short of the requirement. VILLAGE AT DORSET PARK - REVISED FINAL PLAT --- note #5 indicates that this proposal involves 18 buildings designated by shading, staff counts 22 shaded buildings. --- buildings are numbered 1 through 30 but there are only 28 buildings on the plan. --- a revised landscaping plan should be submitted. --- the currently approved multi -family buildings along the north property line have a 15-17 foot side yard setback, the proposed buildings will reduce this setback to only 10 feet and the new SEQ zoning requires a 20 foot side yard setback for multi -family buildings. Since this project is a PUD, the applicant may request a modification to the side yard setback requirement. let, alo Ix To: Donald F. Morley From: Eric Farrell Date: Tuesday, July 7, 1992 Subject: Sherwin-Williams Plaza, 370 Shelburne Street, South Burlington I attached copies of the 1983 correspondence with Burlington, when this shopping center was first subdivided into multiple shops and 1,400 SF was added. In connection with the tenant change now proposed, also please find a Site Plan; a self-explanatory letter from Mr. Joseph Oppenlander; a City of So. Burlington - Site Plan Application; and the definition of a "STANDARD RESTAURANT" from the S. B. Zoning Regulations. I represent the new owner of the center who plans to lease 1,850 SF (presently occupied by a retail store) for use as a small restaurant/retail food store with 36 seats, considered a "STANDARD RESTAURANT" in South Burlington. We are shooting for "Site Plan Review" by the South Burlington Planning Commission on August 11th. I expect the SB Planners will look to you regarding traffic since the entire street and R-O-W is in Burlington. Could you please review these materials and call me at 658-6666 with any comments or concerns you might have? We will need additional sewer capacity allocation from Burlington's main plant for this change in use. Scott Corse indicated two weeks ago that such capacity is available for a one-time impact fee. What is the amount of the fee and when does it need to be paid? You can assume the restaurant will serve only two meals per day; that 300 SF of the 1,850 SF will remain a retail use; and that presently, the entire 1,850 SF is devoted to retail use with an average of three employees. We need these formal letters from you (ie. traffic, sewer capacity & water capacity) to follow our Application (submitted today) at your earliest convenience. Glynis Jordon, Planning & Zoning Assistant, advised that the Burlington Planning Office would not otherwise be reviewing this change in tenants. CC: Mr. Joe Weith, So. Burlington City Planner ✓ Cowmi"innet BURLINGTON TRAFFIC COMMISSION 72 SOUTH WINOOM AVENUE TORREY C. CARPENTER. Chairman BURUNGTON, VERMONT 05401 ROBERT S. MACLELLAN. Vice Chairman 102 - 963 - 6351 DONALD F. h(ORLEY. Superintcadent JOHN E. HAYES FRFDFRICK J. BAILEY THOMAS J. CROSBY October 25, 1983,. .. Mr. Colin Lindberg 120 Lake Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Lindberg: In regards to the proposed redevetur.r,cnt of the Sherwin-Williams property in South Burlington, please be advised that I do not foresee any serious traffic congestion -problems 'should a branch post office be located there... Kindly contact me should you have any further concerns. incerely, Donald F. Morley, Superintendent DFM/cjs cc: Mr. Gary Farrell - G /0 14;:>G r p ! r il'' 4� �F Commissione" BURLINGTON TRAFFIC COMMISSION 72 SOUTH WINOOSKI AVENUE TORREY C. CARPENTER Chainuan BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 �pq _ Y63 - 0351 pONALD F. MORLEY, Superintendentirm ROBERT S- MACLELLAN, Vice Chaan JOHN E. HAKES , FREDERICK J• BAILEY September 13, 1983 THOMAS 1• cROSBY • RECEIVED SCP 1 5 1988 Mr. Colin Lindberg 120 Lake Street Burlington, Vermont b5401 Re: 370 Shelburne Street Dear Mr. Lindberg: It is my understanding that you are involved in the design for remodeling the Sherwin-Williams storg at the above address. The store, presently about 16,000 square feet, will have about 1,400 square feet added and be split into five low--traffic-volume stores. On -site parking is to be reduced somewhat to add land- scaping. One curb -cut on Shelburne Street will be closed. Based upon my understanding, I do not foresee any significant traffic safety or congestion problems arising here. Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention. p cerely, Donald F. Morley, Superintendent DFM/cjs copy:.R. Kamerbeek ' Mr. Gary Farrell 4BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CE 31 • CITY HALL BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 Telephone 802i658-9300 Ext. 155 October 18, 1983 Mr. Colin P. Lindberg 120 Lake Street Burlington, VT 05401 Re: 370 Shelburne Street Dear Mr. Lindberg: This letter is in reference to the redevelopment of the property now occupied by the Sherwin - Williams store at 370 Shelburne Street in South Burlington. The City of Burlington Planning Department has reviewed the proposed site° plan for this propeiTy and finds no problem of aplanning nature with this proposal. It is understood that the Burlington Traffic Engineer is also reviewing the plan from a traffic viewpoint. If there. is any additional information you need, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Robert P. Mitchell Assistnat Director of Planning and Zoning RM:oet cc: Mr. Gary Farrell ri Mr. Dick Ward 9 City of Burlington / p0` Box 849 / Burlingt on, 402 Verrtwnt 05 802/864-7428 19 September 1983 SUPERINTENDENT RECEIVED SEP 1 9 1985 Colin P. Lindberg, Architect 120 Lake Street 05401 Burlington, VT Dear Colin, project will The additional three toilets in the proposed Sherwin Williams have little if any effect on the capacity Of the City sewer system. This de - have the connection of the toilets. partment therefore approve Very truly yours, BURLINGTON ST_ D pARTMENT Brian L. Tuttle, Engineering Asst. BLT : j al - '- 0 Cily OF BURLINGTON, VT f` superintendent / Water James Howley. P.E. Resouroes FFICIENT CAPACITY CEP 1 5 TO: NOTICE OF SU v� Cif4 16 in-to� RE: Poninnal En i eer 1 Agency of fivironmental Conse/vati on 111 gJst_ Street ex Jct., VT 01412 Date: 'S��`C l�Y, 6`b_ The re ferenced project can be supplied from water mains in the area, and its wastewater canbe treated at our wastewater treatment plant Please note that this approval for municipal wastewater treatment t does not include municipal was�hea�urisdictioner oof the er) capability approval is capability. That review and Burlington Street Department. roval is based on the following information, provided by This a pp • W U ,— • _� - Total • estimated demand: av Fire Servi Comments: cc: Thomas Moreau, Wastewater Div. WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Thomas Atherton, Water Div. Plumbing Inspector Street Dept - or Project Owner, or Rep Superi endent Water Resources Dept. File Jai - Howley, Mr. Gary Farrell n • Ci Hall • Post Office Box 878 • Burlington, Vermont • 05402 80y8g3-4501 City of 8urlmgto tY TRANS/OP INC. P.O. Box 29, Route 2A July 6, 1992 Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 878-5977 Mr Eric F. Farrell Coburn & Feeley Real Estate 125 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Farrell: 376 In regard to the commercial project identified as +8-3� Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont, this business activity has been described as a Specialty Retail Center, ITE Land Use Code 814. This type of retail operation is described in the Institute of Transportation Engineers publication entitled Trip Generation, 1991, as follows: "Specialty retail Centers are generally small strip shopping centers containing a variety of retail shops, specializing in quality apparel, hard goods, services such as real estate offices, dance studios, or florists, and small restaurants." The change of 1850 sq ft from a medical supplies store (quality apparel and/or hard goods) to a small restaurant (noon -time business) still retains the types of activities that are associated with a specialty retail center. A specialty retail center, like a shopping center, is.an example of a multi -use development, to which some trips are made for more than one purpose. Therefore, trip generation rates for these land -use activities account for multi -stop trips, and development traffic should not be determined as the summation of individual uses within the center. Because the new land use falls within the definition of a specialty retail center and because this type of commercial activity is defined as a single entity for purposes of trip generation, then no change in development traffic would result in the application of the published trip generation rates for no alteration in the size of the specialty retail center. Please advise of any additional information that may be requires. Thank you. Very truly yours, Joseph C. Oppenlander, P.E. Vice -President JCO : nj k CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) CW t52 69--r-tS^/-1vv6S7-me,- c TcL- : z 5 1 8S!® : STt y 43�9RAty � � ►M I T t.-0 �D �/l(puN TJYIN /i-SS D �i 69-i �S �EKI �-?b,e �l�fo u,� rya-�,u R� ✓So x q S TDw ,�, ✓ 2) APPLICANT ( name, address, phone # (* Uf*Cb. E L—oy 8[n 3) CONTACT PERSON ( name , address, phone #) 69ic 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 37o 5# EL-✓aLtf-NC STD E T 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S) CHAv6 e /eCT- t L_ S % 7--0 — a )Z, T?ytt - S wt rg [mac %� CS 7- Pzr e 6yy j 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) -No Ex7beibR oiY-TA-�'66S - J6�1)00 5f�' g*st 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 9) LOT COVERAGE: building%; landscaped areas 71 building, parking, outside storage' % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ Landscaping $ Other Site Improvements (please list with, cost) $ IV/o Ale, 1 1 ) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:_ DCiD $ t,�, 199 Z t^ l �D 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) l 2�J Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 3-4 - 1-2 m. P• 2-3 p.m. p.m. 4-5 p.m. 5-6 p.m. . 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: DATE OF SUBMISSION SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE OF HEARING :n .e I, Public. 21.124 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE vehicle or - A motorized or ummotorized piece of equipment usually used or stored on wheels and used for leisure time for camping, boating and traveling. 21.125 RETAIL STORE A building or portion of a building where the principal activity is the offering of goods and/or services at retail cost. 21.126 RESTAURANT, FAST-FOOD An establishment whose principal business is the sale beverages, for coof foods or the premisesand Of either on or off b, whose operation is characterized y (1) service of food or bevera e or in paper, g ifi containers containers plastic or other disposable (2) availability of food or beverages for immediate consumption upon short waiting time, and (3) insufficient seating facilities within the restaurant building for the volume of food sold. 21.127 RESTAURANT, STANDARD An establishment principal business is the sale of oods or fwhose beverages for consumption within the restaurant building and whose operation is characterized by ( 1 ) service by a restaurant employee at the same table or counter at which food or beverage is to be consumed or (2) a cafeteria -type operation. 21.128 RESTAURANT - TAKE-OUT principal business is thestablishment whose beverages for immediate consumption Outsideods of tor he restaurant building. 21.129 ROOMING AND BOARDING HOUSE - Any wsleeping accommodations with or withoutldingere provided for compensation mealsare for more than one and less than ten persons for -longer than a week at a time. 21.130 SERVICE STATIONS including the building Athe eon, ny lotowhicheisous da for the sale of any motor vehicle fuel or lubricant, and may also have facilities for lubricating, washing, or servicing motor vehicles by any means. 21.131 SETBACK - The distance f'1•ori the nearest a structure to any property line including of street right-of-way. g the 21.132 STREAM, MAJOR - Muddy Brook, Potash Brook, and Winooski River. 21.133 STREAM, MINOR - All other streams, watercourses, 77 Sek6z�o/l RVA , r/l. w VAR' nt PAP I July 15, 1992 Mr. Ray Belair Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator City Of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sherwin-Williams Plaza, 370 Shelburne Street Dear Ray, R E A L E S T A T E I N C. Per your request, here are five revised Site Plans depicting existing conditions. By my calculation, the total lot coverage is approximately 83%. The official Site Plan that was approved in 1983 actually depicts a lot coverage of 80%, not the 71% referenced in the 9/6/83 Planning Commission minutes. I was not involved in that process and therefore cannot account for the discrepancy. Although prior to that meeting, William Szymanski, City Manager, did send a memo (dated 9/1/83) to the Commission indicating that a variance had already been granted. Notwithstanding, I don't know why coverage was even an issue nor the need for a variance. Before any plans were submitted in 1983, the total lot coverage stood at 91% and had not changed since the old A&P was built back in the 60's. It was therefore "grandfathered". Although the 1983 request included adding 1,400 to the building, it was to be over existing paved parking area, thus no change in coverage. Also several improvements were proposed for the property, including: the elimination of the south curb cut onto Shelburne Street; the addition of green space with substantial plantings; an attractive facelift to the building facade and the reorganization of the internal parking and circulation. All resulting in a reduction of the total lot coverage to its present 83%. I do not believe that coverage should have been an issue in 1983, nor should it be today. Please let me know if you require any additional information and/or clarification, so that we can address any remaining concerns that you, Joe, Dick or the Commission might have prior to the meeting on August 1 Ith. Sincerely yours, C9� Eric F. Farrell The Wells -Richardson Building P.O. Box 923, 125 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05402 802-658-6666 CC: Evergreen Investments Limited, Owner Anthony P. Gamache, Applicant Residential • Commercial • Business Brokers Property Management 0 Development A-7 77T, A 5 P-HA --r PA\A N r/41 � ^ i H&I -- as G�� `�� r iR - 4 a P Al�-Fltr=Aa. 'To 7vw-1,- A:�f44AL-1 I �1�1 vi d. UP-1-I&HT C" WAILA, �4Tt�.' L-1criltr C-4L f t--� 47:2 I V6 Qs 6 ') 9-, �S �2 ��ih = L�'I YO Q�q [42 .............. F�„°yad- - 16-lAll -- Steve Goodkind PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Justin Rabidoux PROJECT ENGINEER March 19, 1999 1 PUBLIC WORKS Mr. Edward D. Ploof Jr. Working together for Burlington Start to Finish Construction 65 Heineberg Drive Colchester, VT 05446 P.O. BOX 849 - BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0849 (802) 863-9094 PHONE - (802) 865-0466 FAx Re: Sewer Allocation for 370 Shelburne Road (Blimpie's Sub Shop) Dear Mr. Ploof: This letter is to inform you and the State of Vermont Environmental District that the City of Burlington's wastewater treatment facilities have sufficient unreserved capacity to handle the additional 720 GPD domestic flow from the mentioned project. You stated that the previous tenant (Fassetts Bakery Thrift Shop) had a permit for 30 GPD, and Blimpie's needs 750 GPD. Based on those figures, the City will allocate you the additional 720 GPD to meet your demand of 750 GPD. Domestic flow is treated at the City of Burlington's Main wastewater treatment plant on Lavalley Lane. This capacity letter is good for a period of one (1) year from the date of writing, after which you will have to reapply. Changes in the flow estimate also requires reapplication. Please call with questions. Sincerely, Justin Rabidoux Project Engineer cc: File CITY (ter' SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 8, 1999 Ed Ploof, Jr. 65 Heineberg Drive Colchester, Vermont Re: Deli/Bakery, 370 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Ploof Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Director of Planning & Zoning on April 16, 1999. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Q Joe Weith, Director Planning and Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl