Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-86-0000 - Supplemental - 0004 Shaw Avenue (2)SOU" )3UR LINGTON 'ZONING BOA%D OF �J US1'?". 'NT Findings in accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in t e neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (' (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; q'' (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential! character of the neighborhood or district in which the property Is located nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent ,property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # •�"�� Date 7 1 Appellant ' J e (3" Vote: Yes NoEJSign List findings below: 2. /ram vc,'ye- 1117,,.a.L_ 1161,1 Cc /Va c, 1�l"' --A, SOU" �3UP LINGTON •ZONING BOA%D OF �J US'1 Mu NT Findings In accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical•circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; EJ (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; nx, (1+) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and ID (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan.El ! Appeal # Date Appellant Vote: Yes No Sign List findings below: 2. 3 SOU" Y3UP LINGTON ZONING BOA%ll OF UJ US'1'M: NT Findings in accordance with Section 446e of the /Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is there•fpre necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; jam' LJ (3) That such unnec ssary hardship has not been created by the appellant; �'. (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and = ( ", (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # �-- Da t e Appe Vote Li -" 1. 2. 3. SOU` ) UP LINGTON ZONING I OA? D OF BUJ US'I Mu NT Findings in accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to 'such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; U (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; n (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and E (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. El Date 2 �° Appellant Vote: Yes List findings below: 3 No Q Appeal Sign ��- SOU" Y3UPLINGTON "ZONING BOA%D OF UJ USTM^ .NT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to 'such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; EY (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential.l character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent p perty, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (s) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date_ Z-7- If -� Appellant Vote: Yes Q' No List findings below: 1. A/d UDba v4 2. 3.i� Appeal # 2 Sign ), SOU )BUP LINGTON ZONING BOA%U 01 Findings in accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical•circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (1+) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential! character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and El (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. a Aeal # Date /Lc - p p Appellant Vote: Yes 0i List findings below: 2• 3: No Q 'td6l"I't r S i g //-( l