The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSP-81-0000 - Supplemental - 0080 San Remo DriveDate Received By Date Application CompletW and Received BY CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIE" 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NU14BER OF: (a) Owner of Record �v2 NGTt��i l,Ty COZY 3(ob �oesc-;- Sir: So . v P-t-►,a C' -moo f► V1-: o Soo 19!— (b) Applicant SAt o e (c) Contact Person -lauot-4A &*44se. 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS -i6m0 -D2 3) PROPOSED USE (S) jy«-a+ N C'%- - 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e., -' of units, floor area, etc.) {-\\tE. A^jn Sc;,.jAVmC ( 5Ooy spa .MT ) 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) U^l'(-K0wt-A 6) COST ESTIMATES: (a) Buildings 501000'- (b) Landscaping I ► q 00--- (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) F coo 7) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE Aog- 30, t qa ( 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) V N1C,µ0W AJ 9) P AK HOUR (S) OF OP ERAT IONy "LA OW A4 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Q 4KW0L✓0 DATE PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 24. 198 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, February 24, 1981 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present George Mona, Vice Chairman; Ernest Levesque, Peter Jacob, Kirk Woolery, James Ewing, Robert Walsh Member Absent Sidney Poger, Chairman Others Present David Spitz, Planner; Edward Emery, L.H. and Roberta Coffin, Fran Reiman, Nancy & John Boyd, Normand & Elaine Lavoie, Bob Furlong, Viola & William Luginbuhl, Thomas O'Connor, Susan Bluto, Barbara & Arthur Toutant, Madlyn Morrissey, Sachi Rowley, Leo Nadeau, Ralph Goodrich, Janice Hill, Mary -Judith Hurd, Donald Kerwin, Ronald Schmucker, Donald & Bernice Brisson, Ruth & Sam Bogorad, Jane & Edith Hendley, Jodie Peck, Free Press; Ann Painter, Sue & Linus Wiles, Michael Dugan, Eric Farrell, Carol Elliott, M. Kevon, Peter Collins, Doug Schner, Carl Cobb, Richard Feeley, Richard Trudell, Walter Bruska, John Voight, Ann Emery, Charles Dunn Minutes of February 17, 1981 On page 1, under the mouth Burlington Corporation application, in the 7th line of the 5th paragraph, the words "and office" should be added after "warehousing and distributing". Also on the 7th line after that line, the words "plus office" should be added after "warehouse". On page 3, in the last line before the vote on that page, the words "the entire property" should be replaced with "lot 6." Mr. Ewing moved to approve the February 17, 1981 minutes as corrected. Mr. Walsh seconded the motion and all voted for it. Application by South Burlington Realtv Corporation for site Dlan aDDroval of a 26,000 square foot warehouse and distribution facility at 2069 Williston Rd. Mr. Spitz said all the necessary information was not yet in. The building will have to be moved to fit in all the parking needed. Mr. Ewing moved to continue the public hearing on this application until two weeks from tonight at City Hall at 7:30 pm. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion and all voted for it. Application by. South burlin,ton Realty Corporation for site plan approval of a 5,ULO square foot commercial building at 80 San Remo Drive Mr. Schner said they proposed a warehouse and distribution facility on a lot adjacent to a building which has just been finished (on the north). When approval was granted for the building at 60 San Remo Drive, they said they would erect a mirror image of that building on this lot at a later date, and that is what is proposed now. The Zoning Board approved setback variances for the buildings. There is a common parking area between the buildings. The Zoning Board requested that the firm come to them for conditional use approval for a warehouse operation, as they did with ,j60, when they have a 2. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 24, 1981 tenant for the proposed building. Mr. Scheer said limited parking on the lot would preclude any uses allowed in the Cl or C2 zones. They are talking with prospective clients for a warehouse and distribution facility, but for tonight, the building is speculative. The same procedure was followed with f60 as is proposed here. Mr. Spitz said the Commission could stipulate that any use other than warehousing would require site plan review by the Commission. The approval, if granted, tonight would be for the building, not for a specific use. Mr. Spitz said that stipulations on the previous building had concerned landscaping, drainage, and a circular traffic pattern. Mr. Levesque said he felt the cedars which would be planted for landscaping should be at 1', not 3' intervals in the rear, and he wanted that documented. Mr. ipitz mentioned drainage and Mr. Schner said there were some problems with flooding and that those would be corrected. They plan to drain about 1/3 of each lot to the rear and then bring that water forward through pipes to the street. There will be a pipe also between #40 and #60 San Remo Drive for this purpose. They are considering drainage also on the centerline between #60 and this new building, ff80. Mr. Spitz said that would have to be approved by the City Engineer before issuance of a building permit. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of South Burlington Realty Corporation for a 5,000 sq. ft. commercial building as depicted_on a plan entitled "Proposed Building, No. 80 San Remo Drive", drawn by D. Bailey, dated June 17, 1980, subject to the following stipulations: 1. Landscaping shall include plantin of 4 to 5 foot high cedars at one foot intervals across the rear (east side of the property. 2. A landscaping bond of $1500 shall be provided. 3. This property and the immediately adjacent property tot he north shall each be granted easements to use each other's access drives and circulation lanes. 4. The indicated number of parking spaces is sufficientfora wholesaling and storage building. Any other permitted or conditional use in the C2 zone shall require resubmission to the Planning Commission for revised site plan approval. 5. A complete drainage plan, including spot elevations required by the City Engineer and building slab elevations, shall be submitted_to_and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. The City Engineer may require applicant to provide a bond to cover-- the cost of drainage improvements. 6. Curb_opening shall be a depressed concrete curb paved in place. 7. A revised site plan, containing information required from stipulations 1 and 5shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. This site plan approval expires in 6 months. The motion was seconded by Mr. hawing. It was noted that if stipulation #1 took up all the landscaping money, and caused a problem, the applicant could return to discuss it with the Commission. Mr. spitz felt there was enough money available. The motion carried unanimously. DHS 2/24/81 STIPULATIONS For the site plan application of South Burlington Realty Corp- pration for a 5,000 square foot commercial building as depicted on a plan entitled "Proposed Building, No. 80 San Remo Drive", drawn by D. Bailey, dated June 17, 1980. Stipulations: 1) Landscaping shall include planting of 4 to 5 foot high cedars at three foot intervals across the rear of the property. 2) A landscaping bond of $1500 shall be provided. 3) This property and the immediately adjacent property to the north shall each be granted easements to use each other's access drives and circulation lanes. 4) The indicated number of parking spaces is sufficient for retail and wholesale storage buildings. Any other permitted or conditional use in the C-2 zone shall require resubmission to the Planning Commission for revised site plan approval. 5) A complete drainage plan, including one -foot contours and building slab elevations, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Manager prior to issuance of a building permit. The City Manager may require applicant to provide a bond to cover the cost of drainage improvements. 6) Curb opening shallbe a depressed concrete curb paved in place. 7) A revised site plan, containing information required from stipulations 1 and 5, shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 8) This site plan approval expires in 6 months. _M_E_M_O_R_A_N_D_U_M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 2/20/81 3) Proposed Building, 80 San Remo Drive 1. Site plan should include contours and building slab elevation. Site must drain toward San Remo Drive. 2. Curb opening shall be a depressed concrete curb paved in place. A City Curb opening permit is required. 4) Office Building, 1775 Shelburne Road 1. Sidewalk along Shelburne Road should be included. 2. Deceleration lane along Shelburne Road should be included. Also, a State road opening premit will be required. 3. Entrance radii should have concrete curbs. 4. A storm drain system with settling basin should be included. Parking lot will generate a high storm water runoff which drains to the north west. A drainage easement across this property should be obtained. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 2/20/81 2) South Burlington Reatl� Williston Road Applicant has requested a delay until the next regular meeting (March 10) to allow for possible redesign based on topography limit- ations in the rear of property and new tenant's requirements. 3) South Burlington Realty, San Remo Drive Applicant is appearing before the zoning board Monday for dimensional and parking variance requests. Pending favorable action the applicant will then proceed with site plan review. This lot and proposed building is a mirror image of the adjacent lot to the north which received site plan approval in November 1979. Previous stipulations which should also apply to this lot are (a) planting of cedars at 3 foot intervals along the rear property line, and (h) prohibition of roof drainage onto adjacent lot to the south. This is a speculative building. 14 proposed parking spaces are sufficient only for certain types of uses - e.g. wholesale, warehouse and distribution, etc. - and approval should be limited to specified uses. 4) Farrell, Shelburne Road Proposed office building is on the Coburn and Feeley lot on which a .similar proposal was rejected by the City Council under in- torim zoning because the site is within a proposed intersection for the South Burlington Connector. The City Attorney has advised that the Planning Commission's site plan authority does not provide for re- jecting a proposal even though it conflicts with transportation pro- visions in the City's comprehensive plan. Curt) cut is proposed at the northern edge of the property. A preferahle location would be directly across from the Benes Inn drive- way. Sight distance is adequate at both locations. Applicant has proposed 148 parking spaces (1 per 200 square feet)# as per the ordinance. I feel this is excessive. Removal of up to 28 spaces would increase green space and would still leave 1 space per 250 square feet. A sidewalk should be provided along the frontage of the property. 5) GBIC See attached information. No Text