Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0050 San Remo DriveFebruary 16, 2011 Re: #SP-10-86 & #DR-10-06 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincer R ymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 3552 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.coni #S P-10-86 #DR-10-06 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SPOTLIGHT ON DANCE — 50 SAN REMO DRIVE SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-10-86 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION #DR-10-06 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Spotlight on Dance, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking site plan review to amend a previously approved plan for a 5,250 sq. ft. building used for personal instruction use. The amendment consists of: 1) allowing the use of 2,900 sq. ft. of the building for cultural facility use when that space is not being used for personal instruction use, and 2) adding a new emergency door on the north side of the building, 50 San Remo Drive. The Development Review Board held a public hearing onFebruary 15, 2011. Tim Barden represented the applicant. Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant is seeking site plan review to amend a previously approved plan for a 5,250 sq. ft. building used for personal instruction use. The amendment consists of allowing the use of 2,900 sq. ft. of the building for cultural facility use when that space is not being used for personal instruction use. 2. The applicant is also seeking Design Review approval to add a new emergency door on the north side of the building. 3. The application was received on November 19, 2010. 4. The owner of record of the subject property is South Burlington Realty Co. 5. The subject property is located in the Central District Zoning District, Central District 4 sub -district and City Center Design Review Overlay District 2. 6. The plan submitted is entitled "50 San Remo Drive Site Plan," prepared by South Burlington Realty Co., dated 8/18/08. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS 7. Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: 1 PADevelopment Review Board\Findings_Decisions\2010\50SanRem oDrive DR1006 SP1086 ffd.doc #SP-10-86 #DR-10-06 (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. While there are no physical changes to the site layout or transition, the occasional shift in use results in shifting parking demands. The use of 2,900 SF of cultural facility would require 33 parking spaces (.33 per maximum permitted occupancy of 100). Only 15 are provided on site. This represents a significant shortfall and is inadequate. It does not appear that more parking spaces can be provided on site. The applicant has pursued a shared parking arrangement with abutting properties with the premise that the cultural facility use would be after 5 pm, making shared use of parking spaces easily accomplished. The applicant is proposing to share 20 spaces with the property at 364-368 Dorset Street. This would provide 35 parking spaces for the 33 which would be required after 5 pm. The two uses could not take place at the same time. (b) Parking: (a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. (b) The Development Review Board may approve parking between a public street and one or more buildings if the Board finds that one or more of the following criteria are met. The Board shall ,approve only the minimum necessary to overcome the conditions below. (i) The parking area is necessary to meet minimum requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act; (ii) The parking area will serve:a single or two-family home; (iii) The lot has unique site conditions such as a utility easement or unstable soils that allow for parking, but not a building, to be located adjacent, to the public street; (iv) The lot contains one or more existing buildings that are to be re -used and parking needs cannot be accommodated to the rear and sides of the existing building(s); or, (v) The principal use of the lot is for public recreation. (c) Where more than one building exists or is proposed on a lot, the total width of all proposed parking areas that are both to the side of a building and between the front lot line and the building line of the building on the lot that is closest to the public street shall not exceed one-half of the total building width of all buildings on the lot that are located adjacent to the public street. Buildings separated from the front lot line by parking approved pursuant to 14.06(C)(2)(b) shall be considered adjacent to the public street. Buildings separated from the front lot line by any other parking areas shall not be considered adjacent to the public street. (d) The DRB shall require that the majority of the parking on through lots and corner lots be located between the building(s) and the side yards or between the building and the front yard adjacent to the public street with the highest average 2 PADevelopment Review Board\Findings_Decisions\2010\50SanRemoDrive DR1006 SP1086 ffd.doc #SP-10-86 #DR-10-06 daily volume of traffic. Where the rear yard of a lot abuts an Interstate or its interchanges, the majority of parking shall be located between the building and the side yards or between the building and the yard that is adjacent to the Interstate. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. (t) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniouslyto themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. 8. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South,; Burlington Land Development'Reaulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure andproperly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements 9. There are no changes to the proposed building or to the above mentioned criteria other than a minor change proposed with the addition of a new emergency door on the north side of the building. 3 PADevelopment Review Board\Findings_Decisions\2010\50SanRemo Drive DR1006 SP1086 ffd.doc #SP-10-86 #DR-10-06 TRAFFIC The applicant has stated that the cultural facility use will not operate between the hours of 4 and 6 pm on weekdays. Therefore, there are no additional trip ends to be generated by this new use. DECISION Motion by , seconded by , to approve Site Plan Application #SP-10-86 and Design Review Application #DR-10-06 of Spotlight on Dance subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plans submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3. The building shall be used for only one approved use at a time. 4. The cultural facility use shall not operate between 4 and 6 pm on weekdays. 5. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 17.04 of the Land Development Regulations or this approval is null and void. 6. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the'space as a cultural facility. 7. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board or the Administrative Officer. Mark Behr — yea/nay/abstain/not present Matthew Birmingham — yea/nay/abstain/not present John Dinklage - yea/nay/abstain/not present Roger Farley - yea/nay/abstain/not present Gayle Quimby — yea/nay/abstain/not present Michael Sirotkin— yea/nay/abstain/not present William Stuono- yea/nay/abstain/not present Motion carried by a vote of = Signed this day of 2011, by Mark Behr, Chairman 4 PADevelopment Review Board\Findings_Decisions\2010\50SanRemoDrive DR1006 SP1086 ffd.doc #SP-10-86 #DR-10-06 Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior Court, Environmental Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be mailed to the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4)(A). Please contact the Environmental Division at 802-828-1660 or http://vennontjudiciga.orWGTC/environmental/default aspx for more information on filing requirements, deadlines, fees and mailing address. The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identt apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call 802.879.5676 speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 5 P:\Development Review Board\Findings_Decisions\2010\50SanRemoDrive DR1006 SP1086 ffd.doc L-4 QED ST, CA" E, 4T- 14C,47-; OF NEW GO exkl r 100 eomi O'Ll "'TE -st-1 vM WMANWIL South 5urlinetom Kcalty Company Scale 1" 20' Rev. - 1 1/0,? RECEIVED NOV 19 2010 City of So. Burlington ` Page 1 of 1 ray From: tbardenvt@gmail.com on behalf of Tim Barden [tim@spotlightondance.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 1:47 PM To: ray Subject: Studio three Just got off the phone with So. Burlington Realty and understand you're looking for confirmation the at no time will we be using Studio Three as a cultural facility from 4 to 6 pm weeknights. This note is to confirm that. Sorry I seemed to have missed your earlier email. Tim Barden 2/10/2011 r Page 1 of 3 ray From: tbardenvt@gmail.com on behalf of Tim Barden [tim@spotlightondance.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 7:04 PM To: ray Cc: chet@south burl ingtonrealty.com; john@south burl ingtonrealty.com; jen@spotlightondance.com; martha@spotlightondance. com-, Tim McKenzie Subject: Fwd: FW: rpt372 01/12/2011 - Spotlight On Dance / Studio Three Hello Ray, Per Joe Bernard's note below, the maximum capacity of the space is 100. I assume we will need to amend our paperwork to request a 25 % parking waiver. That, in addition to the request coming your way from So. Burlington Realty should get us to the required 33 spaces. Please let me know what you need from our end to make that happen and if you need anything else from us. Regards, Tim Barden Spotlight On Dance, Inc. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Joseph Benard <'benard dps.state.vt.us> Date: Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:52 PM Subject: FW: rpt372 01/12/2011 To: Tim Barden <tim@spotlightondance.com> Joe Benard Division of Fire Safety - Williston Office Assistant State Fire Marshal Arson Investigator (802) 879-2310 - Phone (802) 240-2765 Pager jbenard@dps.state.vt.us -----Original Message ----- From: j@ benard@dps.state.vt.us [mailto:jbenard dps.state.vt.us] Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 12:52 PM To: Joseph Benard Cc: Joseph Benard Subject: rpt372 01/12/2011 01/12/11 12:52 SITE 1/13/2011 ' Page 2 of 3 79872 1355146 EVENT STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT Site Details: Date of Inspection: 01/12/11 50 SAN REMO DRIVE - SPOTLIGHT ON DANCE 50 SAN REMO DRIVE Compliance Date: S BURLINGTON VT 05403 02/12/11 Owned By: Date: SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY JOHN JAEGER 85 SHUNPIKE ROAD WILLISTON VT 05495 802-863-9039 Type: Achieved Inspected By: BENARD Inspection FOLLOW-UP Description of Project: PROPOSED THEATER USE 2010 Hazard Index: 2 Violations: NONE ENTERED Notes/Details: THE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE REAR SPACE IS SET AT 100 @15 SQUARE FEET PER PERSON. 80 FOR SEATING & 20 FOR STAFF AND PERFORMERS. PROVIDE A SECOND MEANS OF EGRESS WITH PANIC HARDWA RE/DOOR MUST SWING OUT AND PROVIDE AN EMERGENCY/EX IT SIGN OVER DOOR. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK MUST BE DON E BY LICENSED ELECTRICIAN. 1/13/2011 Site Plan Application Permit Number SP- APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): ySot4rJ4 SUKUAWMN PQAL7-Y CC . P-K•y*3 --gins-9' , FAx 965*-?/A$- 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #). 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): SP07th5dr olv DA&)Cc, r've- 4 n W, �4U 2 inn o flR , s v. �tis,t& 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): TI A& MA ILMF A) , S POTLi9 kr ON NNLE , 73T- SM C. a. Contact e-mail address: QNeREOGRAPti1tS Q �/ANaO • CoM 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: '50 SAEr j RE MO DR -I VE 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 14700 — 0O ,So 6 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): • :FNsrA«ATio#v o>F A 1v61v 6ffiMdErucy EY0- 006 o. ADD THE USE OF "' C w LTWRAL- fACitt-fe ?b TN �)6P.-H0N n* -rNK RtiiL3,ar. i.kCDO GN922E& - UsE 1 R - Nv 1M S i AIE of 30& u C-r; a N'" Site Plan Application b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): 0 S1450 WI ��-til-D�NCr /N tI 145 "PERSONI(FL rAjS-htue7lpN c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): AJr ki u sE OF "inuLTU 2AL 4FOO-eAl'+'t., " PRdioSE19 d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): F/e,�� f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): -P4011III -- g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non - office employees): /I ErHp/0 ye j S — " C h*Aj6 C . h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: / 81 () 0 0 Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing % Proposed % / 5s :4 M sq. ft. sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing +43. % 19 0 sq. ft. Proposed Y 3 , 4{ % 8 i0 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq Proposed % sq. ft. &%r s I Ad) 140 Site Plan Application d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 3o Sr * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ %/, A-Q 0 " (VC4(t) b. Landscaping: $ c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): A YOO ! 4*-A' T 51-/4LC 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): —Af6NC- - opt" Ar 4: &wPNA (J% -F) c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): i�.,w — 5-.'06Aw-, 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION. 7 ' 3 0 ` S : OQ PAA 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: MaN -7hu09S 't dA'- A 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 0Ce &-%''1l. e< IS-. av/O 14. ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 3 Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGN- AJJR—OF APPLICANT 1)4 04X-0-114 � Ctotr. T1+p►rSl14w c r— SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: [ Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: VComplete / , 1114compI of PlanNng- & Zoning or Designee 5 outh MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, AICP, Associate Plannerg RE: Agenda Item #5, Spotlight on Dance DATE: December 30, 2010 Spotlight on Dance, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking site plan review to amend a previously approved plan for a 5,250 sq. ft. building used for personal instruction use. The amendment consists of: 1) allowing the use of 2,900 sq. ft. of the building for cultural facility use when that space is not being used for personal instruction use, and 2) adding a new emergency door on the north side of the building, 50 San Remo Drive. Staff has attached a draft decision, which is incomplete as there are significant parking issues. While there are no physical changes to the site layout or transition proposed, the occasional shift in use results in shifting parking demands. Based on 5,250 square feet of personal instruction, 6 parking spaces are required (two per employee). The use of 2,900 SF of cultural facility would require 27 parking spaces (.33 per maximum permitted occupancy of 80). Only 15 are provided on site. This represents a 44.4% shortfall and is inadequate. Since it does not appear that more parking spaces can be provided on site, the Board could limit the total occupancy of the building to 45 persons when the space is being used as a "cultural facility," but then this condition would be impossible for staff to enforce. The applicant could pursue a shared parking arrangement with abutting properties if the cultural facility use would be after 5 pm, making shared use of parking spaces easily accomplished. Staff recommends that the Board continue Site Plan application #SP-10-86 and Design Review application #DR-10-06 until the applicant can address the parking shortage. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sbLirl.com 0 50 San Remo Drive Abutters List 72 San Remo Pizzagalli Construction PO Box 2009 South Burlington, VT 05407 40-60 San Remo, & 360-368 Dorset Street South Burlington Realty, LLC Po Box 2204 1 South Burlington, VT 05407-2204 55 San Remo & 358 Dorset Street Malone San Remo Drive Properties LtC 122 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, V"I' 05602 45 San Remo Champlain Oil Company, Inc 45 San Remo Drive South Burlington, V"I' 05403 32 San Remo Timber Lake Associates 32 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Richer Residential Trust 68 Barrett Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Valerie & Kyle Williams 70 Barrett Street South Burlington, VT 05403 R n Lj 0" 0 Permit plumber DR- - 6)(0 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICAI`ION FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board, 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): C-'- Design Plan Approval ❑ Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF .RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fm-. #) -SO u-rr4 13ye-C +arj Co, Rv• w J4Uy, so.&a-1xfhyv of 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) SPOT C. L SAT 6 N NA) C t S'b 5A N E? Gy" 0 DR - So. Sint tifvg*&y VT-- OSYo? - ilk &S 17e, 44 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) -T'irv\ F,�AitAeoy %71fkT- 6&.1PMge, Tp 5lwh0H0 t)P. Su.Q,.rc ( . 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 17T Y - t y Y 3 �1zr 96r- `i L 4 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) % K a - ep 0 y- 0 C- 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement. or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. -TN s7At/A-il'u tiJ of' A AtW ' &*V 66W C y &ki r. i>u6 4 p" IUo✓t7 \ Ss)W Of g#Lk•;L Do0 N9. The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. 67 SIGN)M OF APPLICANT Cp SIGNATURE OF LAND/BU1LDING OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBI* USSION: I 1 l 0 I have reviewed this esign review application and find it to be: , 4oi}plete /) j 1 ❑ Incomplete of Planrffi g & Zoning or Designee I Spotlight on Oance, .4/nc. November 5, 2010 Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ray: Enclosed for your consideration, please find our application for Site Plan Review for the following proposal: To add the additional use of "Cultural Facility" to the 2,260 SF studio (Studio Three) located in the rear of our three studio facility at 50 San Remo Drive, South Burlington Vermont. Our plan is to host occasional live artistic events to consist of dance, plays or small musical performances. Due to the schedule of current dance classes, these events would only be held on weekend evenings and Sunday afternoons with a maximum occupancy of 80 people. All scheduled events would be hosted by Spotlight on Dance. The room will not be rented out to third parties and alcohol will not be provided on the premises. The Vermont Department of Fire Safety has inspected the building and has made recommendations for safe egress. To accommodate parking for 80 patrons, we are requesting approval of a parking plan to include 50 San Remo Drive and the new lighted on street parking on San Remo Drive. The South Burlington Land Development regulations call for .33 spaces per person. (80 X .33 = 26.4). Currently, Spotlight on Dance has 15 spaces. These spaces along with ample street parking on San Remo Drive, should be more than adequate for a weekend evening event. As you know, one of the Central District's goals is to concentrate mixed uses, with shared parking to create an aesthetically pleasing and socially active community center. We hope you will consider these applications and grant the additional use of Cultural Facility for Spotlight On Dance's Studio Three. Sincerely, Timothy Barden Spotlight On Dance, Inc. 50 San Remo Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 (802) 865-7626 r co", I bi ME Appendix A spotlight on fiance Design Review Additional Information November 2010 RECEIVED NOV 19 2010 City of So. Burlington Objective —Install 2nd Emergency Egress in existing "Studio Three" space to facilitate its use as a cultural facility Proposed Work —Install Emergency Exit in the North wall of the Studio Three space per recommendation of the State Division of Fire Safety (Joe Benard). RECEIvED NOV 19 2010 City of So. Burlington No Text No Text ;This is the North East Exterior of 50 San Remo Drive. Here, to lithe left of the HVAC system in the lower right corner is a graphic representation of the proposed emergeRepedt' r d concrete threshold. Nov 19 2010 City of So. Burlington i t d' No Text No Text SO 6ftN 'R cmo DR"\VC ___ 14 CIO ()w V, OF NDJ "-woo Doi r!S X. bU "TE -$t.1 SA&) Remo L�- I �� iVAN o�vE LI �uoN) (.�i� — . C t, Zst> :s F -?- i an p . �v T-7 I'D -7 Z- - South 5urlimetom Realty Compamy Scale 1" = 20' Rev. - <7// I/Oz L- R E C E V E'EJ NOV 19 2010 City of So. Buding;,,-n --I IN f� southburlington PLANNING & ZONING TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner(,r� , i DATE: July 17, 2009 Cc: John Jaeger, South Burlington Realty Co. Site Plan Application #SP-09-59 50 San Remo Drive South Burlington Realty, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan approval to amend a previously approved plan for a 5,250 sq. ft. building consisting of 2,955 sq. ft. of personal instruction use and 2,295 sq ft. of photocopy and printing shop use. The amendment consists of converting 2,295 sq. ft. to personal instruction use, 50 San Remo Drive. The change in use of 2295 square feet of photocopy and printing shop use to personal instruction use will result in the following changes: Traffic- Based on the 8th edition of the ITE Trip Generation report, both uses would be classified in the same category of specialty retail. Therefore, there are no changes to the estimated traffic. Parking- Based on the South Burlington Land Development Regulations of 2 spaces per employee and 3 employees, 6 parking spaces are required. 15 are provided on site. No changes to the site or to the structure are proposed. Dimensional requirements remain unchanged. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Site Plan application #SP-09-59 of South Burlington Realty. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.shuri.com 9 CICAZ J I i �4 VAN REIN �D R'l NV E yw o sF 1�34f%\ A-, vt:5 -, cwzsr::> sFr I 2.9.2. % 14� 15 tow— Omm magowk South burhmtom Kealty Compamy 'acale� V, 90' RL PAAI e- Ray. D /,z o N\/Ac PA To Rbw,�v o-Ai 7/07 Ael'e- -M;7W, Site Plan Application Permit Number SP- - APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD ) _ ur(iv\-L1 . v me as shown on deed, mailing addr ss, e� tt\J C. "Id a V / , � �C� . r.1 v ne and fax #): izoy 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #): Eq 'E7 = I `{ S 3. , PPLICANT (Name, mailing addresshone and fax #). 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Sta Include name, address, phone & fax #): g, w �� r _SDV r (: ►� �a Go 5 A to- e a�_ 5 --4)-- 21 a. Contact e-mail address: o� h 5��� b v r ( inn.ytbv� Ye- ��� C. o �+►°l- 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: S c) o Or i v y 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): I I I b -0 05 n � 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 a ---w .—I L_-\. b. Existin Uses on Property (including descri ZZ 9 J Site Plan Application ion and size9f each separate use: �nce'� 2rsoK a � —�-kx 5 r_uL-Ti`nv� ,A\)I 7Lvrren-rlV(k<-aKrt' c. Proposed Uses on property include descr tion and size of each new use and exi ng uses to remain): Sy e rf u h.c% 1-r J C-7t 0VI I i Q h-t— Vr, a n� d. Total building square footaqe on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): y�D 5i e. Height of building & nuir,!?•2r of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): jam( �� d d� 516- b f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): A'% D n 2 g. Number of employees & office employees):� ny vehicles (existing and propose, note office versus non- h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 9 D Sq. Ft. a. Building- Existing ?-C� -Z % / 5-Z sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing -3 % / -,. sq. ft. Proposed 3- % / �sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing f % / AIJA sq. ft. Proposed I sq. ft. 2 Site Plan Application d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 71 Soo b. Landscaping: $ c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 1� ^1c, c o hsg� q- new v .5eSq 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC dp-^e 5e0.� �-e`Fc,, -tt- % a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): A ,p p ro )t_ . I b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): D c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): Ale V-E>1C 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: — 3 `� D ✓►� 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: w - U 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE. 14. ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 3 Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIbNA,,,-TikE OfFAPPL4CANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 7 /1 D REVIEW AUTHORITY: R Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: �s Complete ❑ Incomplete of Pranning & Zoning or Designee 5 Date s outhIyurli ng o. PLANNING & ZONING July 10, 2009 South Burlington Realty Company, LLC Attn: John Jaeger PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: 50 San Remo Drive Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is the draft agenda for the July 21, 2009 South Burlington Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com r southburlington PLANNING & ZONING July 10, 2009 Robert Richer 68 Barrett Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: 50 San Remo Drive Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the July 21, 2009 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. The enclosure includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburi.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 JULY 2009 PAGE 5 10. Site Plan Application #SP-09-58 of Eagles Champlain Aerie #793 to amend a previously approved plan for a multi -use and multi -building complex. The amendment consists of constructing a 17'xl.9' deck to building "B," 1233 Shelburne Road: Mr. Souture said they need a deck for people to smoke. There would be a few tables for lunches. Mr. Belair noted he had received 2 e-mails from neighbors opposing this. Mr. Souture said they are using the area for smoking now and ti'ley have the approval -�f the President of the Association. He added that there- lied been no objection a few months ago, Board members felt the objections were more of an internal issue. Mr. Belair said the approval motion will be amended to show the owner as the Association. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-09-58 of Eagles Champlain Aerie #793 subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above=-. Mr. Far1Pv seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 11. Site Plan Application #SP-09-59 of South Burlington Realty Co., LLC, to amend a previously approved plan for a 5,250 sq. ft. building consisting of 2,955 sq. ft. of personal instruction use and 2,295 sq. ft. of photocopy and printing shop use. The amendment consists of converting 2,295 sq. ft. to personal instruction use, 50 San Remo Drive: Mr. Thabault said this is a change of use request. Most of the building was changed to a dance studio, and they now want to lease the rest of the building for a third studio. They have successful after -school programs. No issues were raised. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application SP-09-59 of South Burlington Realty Co., LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Other Business: Mr. Belair presented a request for a one-year extension to the site plan approval for 27-31 Commerce Avenue project #SP-08-119. He had no issues with granting the request. Ms. Quimby moved to approve the one-year extension, through 20 July 2010, for SP-08- r /7r1o,Zy southburlington PLANNING & ZONING July 22, 2009 John Jaeger South Burlington Realty Co. PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: 50 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Jaeger: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Development Review Board on July 21, 2009 (effective 7/21/09). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, t'4'" &�4 Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 7281 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tall 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com RoP.=,� 9, �, 6S &� ^,t��°"fi ��Pa+,� i K fil e >o ��� � �� y5 ��, � a� South Burlington Realty Company P.O. Box 2204 South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2204 (802) 863-9039 July 8, 2009 Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ray: Enclosed is a revised copy of the Site Plan for 50 San Remo Drive which was submitted last week in our Applications for Site Plan and Design Review. We would like to revise our application and withdraw our request to move the position of the HVAC pad. The HVAC pad will be located at the previously approved location on the north side of the building as outlined in #SP-08-61 and DR-08-05, approved on July 15, 2008. We are only seeking the Change of Use for the remaining 2,295 SF of space in the building. We wish to be included in the July 21 meeting of the Design Review Board. Thanks for your attention to this matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, E� Chet Thabault South Burlington Realty Company Prime Real Estate — Commercial, Residential, Industrial Development Design, Build, Lease, Consulting I ,50 R-6-mo 7m= PEE ^JED 1r-vj 8lA iTe r a, L-1 kA; TE- -st1 44. PQ0 pos Co I Odh-ri 0A1 c'A&) Remo zotjc Lf �l Ll VAN 40 It P OWN-, — '-1715 50 5AN RE MO DRIVE SITE FLAN South 5urlitietom Realty Compare Scale 1" --. 20' Rev. 7//.Y/ox Ar e►K .r southburlington PLANNING & ZONING August 27, 2008 Chet Thabault South Burlington Realty Co. PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407-2204 Re: Design Review Application #DR-08-09 Dear Mr. Thabault: Enclosed, please find the Findings of Fact and Decisions regarding the above referenced Design Review Application. Should you have any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 7243 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com August 7, 2008 South Burlington Realty Co. Attn: Chet PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is the draft agenda for the August 19, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, I,- bQ0, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Durant Street; Soutkl i-sirl'rr*g'tGn, YT IJ5463 Eel 802.g4-1.4.306 fzm 802.HMAIW ww..bur€.corn southhurlingt(mi 11L;A#1NlNG & ZONING August 7, 2008 Valerie & Kyle Williams 70 Barrett Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the August 19, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, "'B� bCi,V K, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. B76 Dorset Street Southff,arlinglon, VT 05403 tai 002,,,94 .006 ixx 802AW4101 www.sbucf.cmm r southburlinoon CZY PLANNING & ZONING August 14, 2008 Chet Thabault South Burlington Realty PO Box 2026 South Burlington, VT 05407-2026 Re: 60 San Remo Drive Dear Chet: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy aonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tall 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com Permit Number DR- V t APPLICATION for MASTER SIGNAGE PERMIT City of South Burlington ALL information requested in this application must be completed in full. If you do not provide all of the requested information with this application form, as well as the required plans and design information, the City will not schedule a review of the application before the Design Review Committee. Application for: _✓ Initial Master Signage Permit after June 3, 2002 Amendment of Master Signage Permit Individual Sign, pursuant to Master Signage Permit #DR- - Property & Street Address: N KE M 0 Tax parcel ID # (from Tax Assessor or Planning & Zoning): 141,70 — 00 5,0 Property Owner of Record (name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone, fax#): 50H'rH i3tA&L;N&7bN REA4-?'`r CO , '�.O. oe ;40� Applicant, if not Owner (name, mailing address, phone, fax #): Contact person (name, mailing address, phone, fax #): 4AW1--AM 13A"N L_ T'' S0. &ieL 9WJ ACKLN 40..P.O.60)c 4a6V S,6 V` OSYO.7 em -s,—A4k Is the applicant an existing or future tenant of the building? Yes V- No Application is seeking approval to: AIA2 rive Q6 S;dN OF r4 I& 7&-AA T' I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my know pplicant Pr ty'6911 g bwner Please do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this application and find it to be I fautj��lv I ode Of,nr * r or Designee complete incomplete Dat Permit Number DR - APPLICATION for MASTER SIGNAGE PERMIT City of South Burlington REQUIRED DESIGN INFORMATION for INITIAL & AMENDED MASTER SIGNAGE PERMITS ONLY The following information MUST be included with the application and/or shown on an accurate plot plan of the lot. Failure to include this information will delay the review of your application! Please submit five full size and one 11"x17" plot plan drawing. 1. Accurate plot plan of the lot, showing the location of: Buildings Parking lots Driveways Landscaped areas 2. Computation of the maximum area, number and height of signs allowed on the property, by type of sign: Free-standing and/or landscape feature signs (See Section 9 and Section 14) Wall signs (See Section 10) Directory Signs (See Section 11) Incidental and Directional Signs (See Section 12) 3. Area and height of each sign proposed for your property (Initial Master Signage Permits and Master Signage Permit Amendments only) 4. Location, size, date of installation, and status of all non -complying signs on your property. DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR THE MASTER SIGNAGE PERMIT (See Section 8(d) of the Sign Ordinance for details) 5. Color illustrations showing proposed: Shapes Materials Foreground and background color schemes Typeface(s) Sizes (include a range of sizes if desired) Installations/sign types Description of how one or more of the features above will relate all of the signs to each other visually. 6. Location and specifications of all proposed light fixtures and lighting elements, including cut sheets. 7. Proposed general design for any incidental and directional signs on the property, other than those with designs prescribed by law. IL-IGd-0 o6c�o ► 210 - oCO-0 va(o� 4� k ��uaKg `lb +�t(e�9- �Wqb - Dy-qa os-�v - oo-,�s� Master Signage Permit Information: 50 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Realty Company DESIGN INFORMATION: 1) Site plan attached 2) One Free Standing sign, 32 SF (16 SF per tenant) Wall signs: Area of front of building = 708 SF 10% allowable for signage = 70.8 SF No Incidental or Directory Signage needed 3) Sign Area and Height: Free Standing Sign - approximately 7' in height holding 2 signs Each sign will be 6'3" in width, 30" in height, (one sign per tenant) Building signs: Each tenant will have approximately 35 SF of signage available on front of building. Signs will be rectangular, placed within sign band, made of painted plywood or similar durable material, painted light background with dark consistent lettering. Each Tenant will have equal space on front of building. 4) Existing backlit sign above entry door (see photo) to be used. Panel is approximately 2' X 4' DESIGN PARAMETERS: 5) Shape of signs to be rectangular with midnight blue molding. Materials will consist of painted plywood Background will be off white Lettering to be pale yellow against a reverse midnight blue logo Tenant #2 sign; midnight blue lettering against off white background Typeface will be a consistent to Sans Serif font with exception of tenant # 1 logo, tenant #2 will choose similar type font. Logo designs will consist of deep blue colors matching exterior molding Posts will be pressure treated 4X4 natural color Signs will be mounted between the 4X4 posts (see sketch) 6) Road Sign will not be lighted 7) No incidental or directional signs will be on the property MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner DATE: August 13, 2008 RE: Agenda Item 8, #DR-08-09 COPY TO: Chet Thabault, South Burlington Realty Design Review Application Master Signage Permit DR-08-09 60 San Remo Drive South Burlington Realty Co, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking to obtain a new master signage permit for a property in the Dorset Street/City Center Design District. The master signage permit would establish the design scheme for the freestanding and wall signs on the property, 60 San Remo Drive. Pursuant to Section 6 of the City of South Burlington Sign Ordinance, the erection, alteration, or relocation of any sign within this district shall require design review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee (DRC) and Development Review Board (DRB). Section 8 of the Sign Ordinance requires all property owners within the DS/CC Sign District to obtain a Master Signage Permit. The Design Review Committee has been unable to meet and so staff has moved the items to the DRB for review. Staff has included the standards for review. 1. A Master Signage Permit shall be issued to the applicant by the DRB, prior to the issuance of any individual sign permit for the property. DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA In reviewing an application for signage, the DRC and DRB shall consider the following: (a) Consistent Design Design Review Application DR-08-09 Page 2 of 4 The design of a sign must be compatible and harmonious with the design of buildings on the subject property and nearby. The design of all signs on a property shall promote consistency in terms of color, graphic style, lighting, location, material and proportions. Staff finds that the design of the proposed signs are harmonious with the design of the buildings on the subject property and nearby. (b) Promotion of City Center Goals Signs within the DS/CC Sign District should be of high aesthetic quality and pedestrian oriented. Staff finds that this criterion is being met. Although proposed materials consist of plywood, the colors, lettering, and design come together to present an aesthetically pleasing sign. The sign is pedestrian scaled at a height of approximately 7 feet. (c) Color & Texture The applicant is proposing that the background area for the freestanding signs to be off white with a dark blue molding. Lettering shall be a pale yellow against a reverse dark blue logo or a dark blue lettering against an off white background. All logo designs shall be dark blue in color. 2. The predominant colors (i.e. central logos and principal text) of the freestanding signs shall be limited to an off white background with dark blue logos or dark blue text. In the case that a dark blue logo be used, a yellow text may be placed upon it. The applicant is proposing that the wall signs consist of a light background with dark consistent lettering. Staff finds this acceptable, provided that the "light' and "dark" colors chosen are compatible with those of the freestanding sign, and are limited to only one light and one dark color, to the satisfaction of the Staff. 3. The predominant colors of the wall -mounted signs shall be a light background with dark lettering or dark logos. The dark and light colors shall be compatible with the colors used in the freestanding sign, and shall not consist of more than one light color, and one dark color, not counting the provision for an off-white background. (d) Materials Used Pursuant to Section 20 of the Sign Ordinance, all signs shall be of substantial and sturdy construction, kept in good repair, and painted or cleaned as necessary to maintain a clean, safe, and orderly appearance. As the applicant is proposing to use plyboard as the main sign material, staff stresses the importance of this criterion. All signs shall be kept in a clean, safe and orderly appearance. The applicant should acknowledge this. Sign support structures will use natural timbers. The freestanding sign shall be composed of aluminum, with the option of using wood trim to match the building. Design Review Application DR-08-09 Page 3 of 4 4. All signs shall be kept in good repair, landscaping surrounding the freestanding signs shall be kept trimmed and neat and shall not obscure the text of the signs. (e) Wall Mounted Signs Section 10 of the Sign Ordinance governs the size and location of wall -mounted signs. Pursuant to Table 10-1 of the Sign Ordinance, a wall -mounted sign for a multi -tenant building or a multi -building lot with a master signage permit in any district with freestanding or landscape sign shall not exceed 15% of the area of the facade to which it is attached or 100 sq. ft., whichever is smaller. Pursuant to Table 10-1 of the Sign Ordinance, the total area of all wall -mounted signs on the subject property shall not exceed 10% of the area of principal public facade of each building. The code officer shall ensure that these criteria are met when issuing individual sign permits for the property. Section 10(c) states that a wall -mounted sign shall not project above the roof or parapet of the building nor below the top of any first floor doorway unless permitted through the design review approval process. The proposed sign locations will not project above the roof or parapet of the subject building. In addition, the proposed signs will not extend below the top of any first floor doorways or windows. Thus, the proposed signage is in compliance with this requirement. Pursuant to Section 10(d), a wall -mounted sign shall not cover any opening or project beyond the top or end of any wall to which it is attached. The proposed signs are in compliance with this requirement. Section 10(g) stipulates that a wall -mounted sign shall not project from the wall in excess of 9". The proposed signs are in compliance with this requirement. (t) Freestanding Signs Section 9(h) states that free-standing signs along Dorset Street are to be located in a sign corridor that begins adjacent to the road Right -of -Way and runs sixteen (16) feet from the edge of the Right of Way toward the building face. In those instances where dimensions do not provide for a two (2) foot setback from the Right -of -Way before a sign support post can be located, it is permitted to erect a centered single pole mounted sign of which the road side edge of the sign is directly outside the R.O.W. line. The code officer shall ensure compliance with this criterion such that the subject sign shall be within this designated sign corridor. Design Review Application DR-08-09 Page 4 of 4 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Design Review Application #DR-08-09 subject to the numbered items included above. 04� yri it I FOR LEASE 863-9039. 71 54) 5A^i l5fG, �pj Sj::�E-Tr-qo '7 m woo v t"m 8 tN�o M;Oo/s N ajoE MAICA; G- (3LA4C 3A"- o R26"No :�4 lfk gl PT. — N✓a F)n��j i 7/W rr owl '. 411 southburlington PLANNING & ZONING May 14, 2008 John & Joyce Belter 2 Country Club Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application regarding your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." Please call our office at 846-4106 if you have any questions Sincerely, Betsy M Donough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: Mark Sperry, Esq. Terry & Bethany Lieberman David W. Rugh, Esq. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846,4101 www.sburl.com r Wo, "Al southbpurIfington PLANNING & ZONING May 14, 2008 Janine Kirchgassner 45 Country Club Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, tJ Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com A P M W, 0404 southburlington PLANNING & ZONING July 16, 2008 John Jaeger Chet Thabault South Burlington Realty Co. PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: Site Plan #SP-08-61 & Design Review #DR-08-05 Dear Mr. Jaeger & Mr. Thabault: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board on July 15, 2008 (effective July 15, 2008). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six 6 months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy c onough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 5874 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www,sburl.com July 7, 2008 South Burlington Realty Co. c/o Chet Thabault PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is the draft agenda for the Lly 15, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24,.Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 5 Gusse t Street South 1-1irlingic"71, V 6403 1.S k6 t,; 0 1 a4X gO', ! 4 6,4-6t July 7, 2008 Robert D. Richer 68 Barrett Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the July 15, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl..com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 75 Dorset Str"rrt: Ssu#0 srl��s±� .ca VT 0546.1 Kill �tt2-04 .K. 36 fa% N()2 A 4,4. 4Ol w,,v .&burrs C,m July 10, 2008 John Jaeger South Burlington Realty Co. PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407-2204 Re: 50 San Remo Drive Hearing Dear John: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. September 18, 2008 Chat Thabault South Burlington Realty PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: Minutes — #dr-08-09, 50 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Thabault: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved August 19, 2008 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 675 Dorset Struot South R.,urfington, VT D54M to.`I t��_f � .�tfl fax 802.A4b. 101 wrjwsburl.aom �nCC tic) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARLi 19 AUGUST 2008 Mr. Dinklage suggested a stipulation that access to the cemetery be off the public street. Mr. Solomon noted that it is a stipulation of Jewish law that you have to have one way in and one way out of a cemetery. Mr. Sheil, a resident of Clover St., was concerned with snow removal onto their property and also with lights shining into their yard. Mr. Dinklage noted there are city ordinances regarding lighting. This will be addressed during preliminary plat. Mr. Burke noted that the City Engineer has asked for curbing around the cul-de-sac. 6. Sketch Plan Application #SP-08-41 of Marie Dubois to subdivide a 4.9 acre parcel into two lots of 4.11 acres and 0.48 acres and add the 0.48 acre parcel to the adjoining 5.30 acre parcel to create a 5.78 acre parcel, 1405 Hinesburg Rd: Mr. Farley stepped down during the application due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Cobb showed the location of city -owned property and open land. A 60-foot right of way is proposed to provide access to the Dubois property. Mr. Cobb also showed the existing buildings. Mr. Belair suggested that these be shown on the survey plan. Ms. Makerjie, resident of 79 Butler Dr., asked about any impact to her property. Mr. Cobb showed the 60-foot right-of-way along the Makerjie property. Mr. Makerjie said there was a right-of-way, but when the lot was transferred, it was not reserved in their deed. He said they own the land outright. Mr. Belair said that is not part of this proposal. Mr. Farley rejoined the Board. 7. Continued Final Plat Application #SD-08-34 of Dorset Street Associates LLC & G&A Associates, LLC, to amend a planned unit development consisting of 149 residential units. The amendment consists of. 1) adding 30 acres to the project area, 2) constructing 79 single family dwellings, and 3) constructing 30 multi -family dwelling units, 1530 Dorset St: Mr. Belair advised that the applicant had asked for a continuance until 16 September. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Final Plat Application #SD-08-34 of Dorset Street Associates LLC and G&A Associates, LLC, until 16 September 2008. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Design Review Application #DR-08-09 of South Burlington Realty Co. - seeking to obtain a new master signage permit for the property in the Dorset Street/City Center Design District. The master signage permit would Q DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOAR 19 AUGUST 2008 establish the design scheme for the freestanding and wall signs on the property, 60 San Remo Drive: Mr. Thabault said they want to change to aluminum or MDF board instead of plywood. He also corrected the address to 50 San Remo Drive. They will set the sign back further, off the city's right-of-way. No issues were raised. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Design Review Application #DR-08-09 of South Burlington Realty Co. subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended to correct the address. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Design Review Application #DR-08-08 of William & Nancy Seidel seeking design review approval to convert the use of a 4432 sq. ft. GFA building from auto service and repair to indoor recreation and tavern uses, within the City Center Design Review District, 35 San Remo Drive: and 10. Site Plan Application #SP-08-71 of William & Nancy Seidel to convert the use of a 4432 sq. ft. GFA building from auto service and repair to indoor recreation and tavern uses, 35 San Remo Drive: Mr. Dawson said the establishment would be open until 10 p.m. Mr. Belair said there is a traffic issue. The current use generates 15 peak hour trip ends, and the proposed use generates 41.51, an increase of 26 trip ends. He felt this would be quite a high impact fee for a tavern use at $1000 per trip end. Using the recreation use would reduce the trip ends or a traffic expert could come up with other numbers. The applicant said they would redesign the project to reduce the tavern area. They will accommodate a maximum of 50 people. The approval motion was amended to add to stipulation #6:"...to be determined by the Administrative Officer." Ms. Quimby moved to approve Design Review Application #DR-08-08 and Site Plan Application #SP-08-71 of William & Nancy Seidel subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 11. Sketch Plan Application #SD-08-42 of the South Burlington School District for a planned unit development for an educational facility complex. The amendment consists of constructing a 33-foot high accessory structure (broadcast booth), 550 Dorset Street: Ms. McIntyre noted that a height waiver is being requested for the press box to be a total of 33 feet high. -5- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: July 11, 2008 \drb\sit\Isbrea1ty\50sanremo siteplan,doc Plans received: July 3, 2008 enda #15 Owner/Applicant South Burlington Realty Co PO Box 2204 South Burlington VT Location Map 50 San Remo Drive SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-08-61 Meeting date: July 15, 2008 Contact Chet Thabault South Burlington Realty Co PO Box 2204 South Burlington VT Property Information Tax Parcel 1490-00050 Central District 2 Zonina District CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING South Burlington Realty Co, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking site plan approval to amend a previously approved plan for 5250 sq. ft. photocopy and printing shop with accessory retail. The amendment consists of: 1) converting 2900 sq. ft. to personal instruction facility use, 2) adding two HVAC units, and 3) adding two parking spaces, 50 San Remo Drive. Associate Planner Cathyann La Rose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on July 3, 2008 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements: There are no changes to the dimensional requirements as part of this application except for the 40 additional SF for HVAC pads. This will amount to less than half a percent and is essentially negligible. All requirements are met. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The proposed use requires 14 parking spaces (print shop space is vacant but included in this calculation). The applicant is proposing 15 parking spaces. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. There are 3 existing parking spaces to the front of the building and 11 to the side. Staff finds this acceptable. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The height of the building will remain unchanged and below 35 feet. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. No changes to the existing buildings are being proposed as part of this application. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The proposed project does not involve any new exterior construction, so this criterion is not applicable. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING (t) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed project does not involve any new exterior construction, so this criterion is not applicable. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. At this time, staff does not suggest providing additional accesses. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). There is an existing screened dumpster on site. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements As there is no building construction proposed for this site, there are no new minimum landscaping requirements. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the plans shall depict snow storage areas that will minimize the potential for run-off. Adequate snow storage areas are shown on the plans. Lighting Pursuant to Section 13.07(A) of the Land Development Regulations, all exterior lighting shall be shielded and downcasting to prevent light from spilling onto adjacent properties and rights -of -way. The applicant has stated that there is no new lighting proposed as part of this application. Traffic Because all uses would likely fall into the category of Specialty Retail under ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, there will be no estimated increase in traffic based on the change in use. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING Staff recommends that the South Burlington Development Review Board approve Site Plan Application #SP-08-61. Respectfully submitted, .. Cathy n LaR se, s ociate Planner Copy to: Chet Thabault, South Burlington Realty Co, applicant Site Plan Application Permit Number SP- APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW 0�� - (/0 / - All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): SOuTN L3 NkCa /U& I-bt�J let14CF-L, CC PH 3?63 - 50 32 irol, 9�as 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): �S�1iv�t et Asoyc 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #)-. (2f%T 7-1-14A3R-c/c'T — 5U Lf TH l �f i /v rr7�i1N 12F1R L`7� eel 76 3�Tf1 a. Contact e-mail address- CHcr & S6)Lipft3w,-'1_,hwi7&,k,0604 iti � 66AA 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: SC SAw ;2 t"► 0 (-)R t,✓V 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): /��r��' -U CSCC 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description: c�F Q) HVACL C'ej&"CT-C Ph�T0G��/pr%. tvit i 7-v Site Plan Application b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): rv► �Ly L.[ScY,) /! { %�?tTYiiL JPP2iILT Cdd!g 5111'i/=' c. Proposed Uses on property I drip ion and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): d(_ \���P a-`j � 5 �` Sc fi &_& D a -S � s `jig (� �Y►'t A,ly' f't11 OiYL' W A '� vl %�Yl.flyl/C V d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): S, a 5-10 SIZ- e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): / c 1 p �t r /, f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): _ /I <.-jAo z — g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non - office employees): / - 4 E m.>-1 Q X i A- ALAOSL ke' h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing % Proposed % / S _3 5� sq. ft. sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / '7, 7 sq. ft. Proposed V 3,3 % / r7,,1� i[? sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing% / M sq. ft. Proposed % sq. ft. ob Site Plan Application d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMAI ES a. Building (including interior renovations): , D►r Gov"''°`�S b. Landscaping: $ f c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 50 t= b f�_ lFyAC- Pips JVo 5 ��y�� .C_0,V1 ih cue 0. S a ew10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC' /� �S �� �`� � k 0, 1 �a� S c - - `a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out). ro -(- , b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): -- /l.(OAIF — .47' 4PW c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): Q �� 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: /t'10 ✓U — 7-/fu r2 S 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14. ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 3 Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the bests my knowledge. SIGNA OF A P CANT SIGNATURE O RO RTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Lam" Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: _7 Complete Ll Incomplete Planning & Zoning or Designee A Date Ft> LA "011- sivo S7b P A �-14 <VF Ll vM ir-j�-44171 Wj P14AF-IeJ Ll > Ll oo' Y, 8 , `goad C-1Z ti P T -7 10 cl dWW— 111P .1 Tz. -s 50 5AN REMO DRIVE RECEIVED SITE FLAN JUL 03 2003 South Burlington Realty Company City, of So. Budington Scale 1" = 20' P,cv- TO: South Burlington Development Revie and FROM: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Plann rat, DATE: July 11, 2008 Cc: John Jaeger, South Burlington Realty Co. Design Review Application DR-08-05 50 San Remo Drive South Burlington Realty, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval for the following exterior modifications: 1) change use of portion of building from photocopy and printing shop with accessory retail to personal instruction, 2) add two HVAC units, and 3) add two parking spaces, 50 San Remo. The subject property falls within Design District 2 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D)(1)(b) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the addition or alteration of an exterior wall of a building or structure shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). The Design Review Committee was unable to meet and so staff has moved the items to the DRB for review. Staff has included the standards for review. Design plans for properties within Design District 1 shall comply with the following design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.01(F) of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. (b) Materials used. A wide variety of both natural and high quality man-made materials are allowed. Examples of acceptable materials include red brick, indigenous stone (i.e., granite, limestone), architectural concrete, synthetic stucco, wood clapboard (synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles), and glass or glass block. Other materials may be used as an architectural accent provided they are harmonious with the building and site. Design Review Application DR-08-05 50 San Remo Drive Page 2 of 4 (c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. For sides of buildings that face or front public streets, the majority of the first floor's facade area shall consist of see -through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity, however, the windows and doors should be of human scale, so as to welcome pedestrians. (e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. There are no changes proposed to the roof of the existing building as part of this proposal. (f) Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns. New buildings shall be built to the street property line. For existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building better to the public street. Such improvements could include installation of doors and windows facing the public street. There are no changes to the orientation of the proposed building. (g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (i) Pedestrian promenade along Market Street. In Design District 1, the provision of a covered pedestrian promenade along Market Street is required in order to protect pedestrians from inclement weather and promote walking. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. In addition, design plans for properties within Design District 2 shall comply with the following site design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.02 of the SBLDR: Design Review Application DR-08-05 50 San Remo Drive Page 3 of 4 (a) Landscape and plantings. Significant trees and vegetation should be preserved in its natural state insofar as practicable. Any grade changes should be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (b) Integrate special features with the design. Storage areas, machinery and equipment installation, service areas, truck loading areas, garbage and refuse collection areas, utility connections, meters and structures, mailboxes, and similar accessory structures shall be positioned in such a way to minimize visibility from the public street. The HVAC units proposed by the applicant are to be located to the north side of the building and are largely screened from public view. They are in an area largely shielded by dense shrubs and underbrush (see attached photos). (c) Walls, fences or other screening features: Such elements, if used, shall be employed in a skillful manner and in harmony with the architectural context of the development. Such features should be used to enhance building appearance and to strengthen visual linkages between a building and its surroundings. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (d) Accessible open space. When providing open space on a site, it shall be designed to be visually and physically accessible from the public street. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (e) Provide efficient and effective circulation. With respect to vehicular and pedestrian circulation, special attention shall be given to the location and number of access points to public streets and sidewalks, to the separation of vehicles and pedestrians, to the arrangement of parking areas and to service and loading areas, and to the location of accessible routes and ramps for the disabled. Site design shall also provide for interconnections, both vehicular and pedestrian, between adjacent properties. The applicant is proposing two additional parking spaces. This should only serve to improve compliance with this criterion. (f) Outdoor Lighting. Outdoor lighting shall be designed to be both aesthetically pleasing and functional. The lighting type shall be metal halide, compact fluorescent, and/or induction lamps, and shall be of a white color (e.g., CR/ 70 or greater). Light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded to preclude glare and overall illumination levels should be evenly distributed. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the existing outdoor lighting. If any changes are proposed to the outdoor lighting, lighting details (cut -sheets) shall be submitted for review. Design Review Application DR-08-05 50 San Remo Drive Page 4 of 4 (g) Provide for nature's events. Attention shall be accorded to design features which address the affects of rain, snow and ice at building entrances and on sidewalks, and to provisions for snow and ice removal from circulation areas. This application is in compliance with this criterion (h) Make spaces secure and safe. With respect to personal safety, all open and enclosed spaces should be designed to facilitate building evacuation, and provide reasonable accessibility by fire, police or other emergency personnel and equipment. Staff finds the existing building is in compliance with this criterion. (i) Streetscape improvements. An applicant for new development shall be responsible for implementing streetscape improvements (e.g., sidewalks, street lighting, street trees, etc.) within the portion of the public street ROW directly fronting the parcel of land for which development is proposed. Such streetscape improvements shall be in accord with the specifications contained in the City Center Streetscape Design Guidelines. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Design Review Application #DR-08-05. r Permit Number DR- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICA`I`ION FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the resign Review Committee and Development Review Board, 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): - Design Plan Approval ❑ Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF CO ame as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and f #} 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 5 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) cl-611 - 5) PROJECT STREET�S: r-- J 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement. or modification for which design review approval is being sought, If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. 7) Z_ The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" « 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. CID - SIG QA L SI A O IN OWNER Do not write below this lime 7�' DATE OF SUBNUSSION: /,/): I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: 9 F(VIC-11 S 7t TE *amc, 50 L"-'---)AN REMO DRIVE 1TE FLAN 5ou-th 5urlimetom Realty Company 5cale 1" 20' Kcv, N C*j- 4*4 Ave f �„ f1� , gt. �AL 1L 7-1 -s �C --4PP- ID P14A .0 Cr FL Ll L a ley � -M low I �101 VAM cwe4r& 5e- —77'24 loo, Y-t C-1Z H 13VA Al V%5 -, SF % Po.gemem: T-7 57 South Burlington Realty Company Scale 1" = 20' RECEIVED City of So. Burlington 50 SAN REMO DRIVE - ABUTTERS OWNER PROPERTY Robert D. Richer 0120-00068 68 Barrett Street Same South Burlington, VT 05403 Valerie and Kyle Williams 0120-00070 70 Barrett Street Same South Burlington, VT 05403 Champlain Oil Company, Inc. 0570-00354C P.O. Box 2126 45 San Remo Drive/ South Burlington, VT 05407 354 Dorset Street Patrick Malone 0570-00055C 122 Gallison Hill Road 55 San Remo Drive Montpelier, VT 05602 South Burlington Realty Company 1490-00040C P.O. Box 2204 40 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT 05407 South Burlington Realty Company 1490-00060C P.O. Box 2204 60 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT 05407 50 5AN REMO DRIVE 51TE FLAN � �U I ( South BurlingtonRealty Company Scale 1" 20 Rev. 1 1,9f&7 South Burlington Realty Company RO. Box 224' South Burlington, Vcrinont 05407-2244 (802) 863-9039 December 10, 2007 Raymond I Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 50 San Remo Drive SP-07-96 Dear Ray: Enclosed are three copies of the revised Site Plan incorporating the following changes: - Bicycle rack has been added. - Snow storage area has been indicated on plan. - Screened Dumpster area has been shown on plan. The enclosure will be 6-foot high stockade fence with hinged doors. - Zoning boundary line has been marked. - Distances from the building to property lines have been added. - One accessible van -capable space has been indicated. - The lighting fixture specification has been added; this represents a change of fixture. We believe the fixture specified is oompliant; if not please let me know so we can change it to one which is. Please let me know if anything else is needed. Thank vou. Prime Real Estate - Commercial, Residential, Industrial Development Design, Build, Lease, Consulting ...... ... .. . . Pr 4571 F 14 G C-ICAZ FAcr— Ll IVAN 0 -7 50 5AN REMO DRIVE 51TE FLAN South Burlington Realty Company 5calc 1" = 20' Rev. 12/10/07 HID FLOODS WALLPACKS SENSORS QUARTZ FLOODS LANDSCAPE LIGHTING VAPORPROOF VANDALPROOF WORKLIGHTS WEATHERPROOF EXPLOSIONPROOF POLES i/LOW BAYS Search NEW! Fully Shielded, Full Cutoff Wallpacks IDA approved WP1FC and WP2FC. IAll PluducLs > Wdilpack� VVpl VVallpacks > WPICH70 r (Vto Jell * bViIdivt%-V„lVW��� `J o e j.-- �- 6`7 D PRODUCT INFORMATION Fixture Color: Bronze Lamp supplied with fixture Lamp Information Type: Watts: Shape/Size: Base: ANSI: Hours: Initial Lumens: Weight: 9.61 Ibs Ballast Information MH Type: 70W Input Watts: ED17 Start/Operating Amps Medium 120V: M98 208V: 15000 240V: 5600 277 V: Wiring Diagram: HX-NPF 120V 94W 2.5/2.1 N/A N/A N/A Click Here K ltyL-Eigi A IGHTING, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Housing: Suitable for wet locations. HID fixtures can be Die cast aluminum, 1/2" NPS tapped top, both wired with 900 C supply wiring if supply wires sides and back for conduit or photocontrol. are routed 3" away from the ballast. Hinged refractor. Continuous one piece silicone rubber gasket. Reflector: Refractor: Semi-Specular anodized aluminum, removable Prismatic optics designed to minimize glare for installation. Symmetrical light pattern and throw light down and out. UV stabilized maximizes distance between fixtures. polycarbonate or glass available. Finish: Conduit Openings: Chip and fade resistant powder coat finish. Top, side and back Template: Patents: Drilling template for easy wall box mounting Pat. D440,683 DIMENSIONS n, „-.,-,-,METRT(. SDDR�vC- G c�) Sc✓�h �- Ear r 1 ) Permit Number SP-d �- U CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) o 0 A h aGf- V C , .fl. v Oyu 5c, J03q r frbS'-J 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page D 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) S ayrk. R-- 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #)-7t `� �►" Ct vn 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: S a ('e M O Uri V' �_ 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1 �� `� ' b O 5 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including desc i tion and size of each separate use) VQ-e- 0. A — b) Proposed Uses on property (!'qclud.description and si of each new use and existing uses t remain) n - `11 ID 100 c�To uil ng sq a footage on property (p oposed bui ings d existing building to remAin) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed bdings and existing buildings to remain, specify S if basement and mezzanine) / T-,�6 V-1-1 e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) 1 f) Number of employees): tJ & company Aehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office g) Other (list any other information pertinent t9,0s application_ not specifically reque ted ab e, please note if Overlay Ristricts are applicable): v-evvl D Vat. ( D * 0 rL (9 YeaOTh o ri Zor,vtoaC u_, o o.t,as ' V a- o- e o fr' T !Ii 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: tr Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing Z`� - -L" % / 5sq. ft. Proposed Lam— %o / sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing Z ,� % / J� sq. ft. Proposed /, � _% / ' -L J sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing A% A % / sq. ft. �- Proposed/' �% sq. ft. e 5,Tr t fi I — �p 0 �1 d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) -- O * V o 1 _ v- e. - * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for Ision control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC - a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): w b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 2 i 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 6 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 3 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 7 REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑■ 2/Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning or Designee 50 SAN REMO DRIVE ABUTTERS 11/19/2007 OWNER PROPERTY Robert D. Richer 68 Barrett Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Valerie and Kyle Williams 70 Barrett Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Champlain Oil Company, Inc. P.O. Box 2126 South Burlington, VT 05407 Patrick Malone 122 Gallison Hill Road Montpelier, VT 05602 South Burlington Realty Company P.O. Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 South Burlington Realty Company P.O. Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 0120-00068 Same 0120-00070 Same 0570-00354C 45 San Remo Drive/ 354 Dorset Street 0570-00055C 55 San Remo Drive 1490-00040C 40 San Remo Drive 1490-00060C 60 San Remo Drive 50,,1-3AN RE MO DRIVE, SOUTH DURLINGTON South Burlington Realty 11/15/2007 Peoieti Review Existing Comditiont.- V. --- - ----- ---- --l—I — tom'"'` Ll —0vP—ro,�eSi2.S'o �aJewev�l 7'-]6O S��d- 0 IN 5-o, D�' Io5' S OF _ ed ;+y —t f �rl ,peg J� mE' -7 O `� , 1 K , � P ar� RECEIVED NOV Z 8 2C;n City of So. Burlington CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 10, 2007 John Jaeger South Burlington Realty Co. PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: 50 San Remo Drive Site Plan #SP-07-96 Dear John: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Administrative Officer on December 4, 2007. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months. Should you have any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, f* q . 1 64 Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 12, 2007 John Jaeger South Burlington Realty Co. PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: Design Review Application #DR-07-11 50 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Jaeger: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on December 11, 2007. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning and Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT #7006 3450 0002 0949 2489 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planneroy DATE: November 27, 2007 Cc: John Jaeger, South Burlington Realty Co. Design Review Application DR-07-11 50 San Remo Drive South Burlington Realty, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval for the following exterior modifications: 1) add additional entry door and roof structure over door to west fapade; 2) adjust parking layout. The subject property falls within Design District 2 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D)(1)(b) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the addition or alteration of an exterior wall of a building or structure shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). The Design Review Committee met on November 26, 2007 and unanimously agreed to support the application for approval by the Development Review Board. Design plans for properties within Design District 1 shall comply with the following design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.01(F) of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. (b) Materials used. A wide variety of both natural and high quality man-made materials are allowed. Examples of acceptable materials include red brick, indigenous stone (i.e., granite, limestone), architectural concrete, synthetic stucco, wood clapboard (synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles), and glass or glass block. Other materials may be used as an architectural accent provided they are harmonious with the building and site. (c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors Design Review Application DR-06-02 366 Dorset Street Page 2 of 4 naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. For sides of buildings that face or front public streets, the majority of the first floor's fagade area shall consist of see -through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity, however, the windows and doors should be of human scale, so as to welcome pedestrians, The proposed door and roof structure are in compliance with these criteria. The new door and structure are proposed to match the existing door and structure. The extended roof will match the existing roofing over the existing door. (e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. There are no changes proposed to the roof of the existing building as part of this proposal. (f) Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns. New buildings shall be built to the street property line. For existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building better to the public street. Such improvements could include installation of doors and windows facing the public street. There are no changes to the orientation of the proposed building. However, the additional door on the front fagade (west) will enhance the building's compliance with this criterion. (g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (i) Pedestrian promenade along Market Street. In Design District 1, the provision of a covered pedestrian promenade along Market Street is required in order to protect pedestrians from inclement weather and promote walking. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application Design Review Application DR-06-02 366 Dorset Street Page 3 of 4 In addition, design plans for properties within Design District 2 shall comply with the following site design criteria as outlined in Section 11 02 of the SBLDR: (a) Landscape and plantings. Significant trees and vegetation should be preserved in its natural state insofar as practicable. Any grade changes should be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (b) Integrate special features with the design. Storage areas, machinery and equipment installation, service areas, truck loading areas, garbage and refuse collection areas, utility connections, meters and structures, mailboxes, and similar accessory structures shall be positioned in such a way to minimize visibility from the public street. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (c) Walls, fences or other screening features: Such elements, if used, shall be employed in a skillful manner and in harmony with the architectural context of the development. Such features should be used to enhance building appearance and to strengthen visual linkages between a building and its surroundings. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (d) Accessible open space. When providing open space on a site, it shall be designed to be visually and physically accessible from the public street. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (e) Provide efficient and effective circulation. With respect to vehicular and pedestrian circulation, special attention shall be given to the location and number of access points to public streets and sidewalks, to the separation of vehicles and pedestrians, to the arrangement of parking areas and to service and loading areas, and to the location of accessible routes and ramps for the disabled. Site design shall also provide for interconnections, both vehicular and pedestrian, between adjacent properties. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (f) Outdoor Lighting. Outdoor lighting shall be designed to be both aesthetically pleasing and functional. The lighting type shall be metal halide, compact fluorescent, and/or induction lamps, and shall be of a white color (e.g., CR/ 70 or greater). Light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded to preclude glare and overall illumination levels should be evenly distributed. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the existing outdoor lighting. If any changes are proposed to the outdoor lighting, lighting details (cut -sheets) shall be submitted for review. Design Review Application DR-06-02 366 Dorset Street Page 4 of 4 (g) Provide for nature's events. Attention shall be accorded to design features which address the affects of rain, snow and ice at building entrances and on sidewalks, and to provisions for snow and ice removal from circulation areas. This application is in compliance with this criterion. (h) Make spaces secure and safe. With respect to personal safety, all open and enclosed spaces should be designed to facilitate building evacuation, and provide reasonable accessibility by fire, police or other emergency personnel and equipment. The additional door will only serve to enhance the building's compliance with this criterion. (i) Streetscape improvements. An applicant for new development shall be responsible for implementing streetscape improvements (e.g., sidewalks, street lighting, street trees, etc.) within the portion of the public street ROW directly fronting the parcel of land for which development is proposed. Such streetscape improvements shall be in accord with the specifications contained in the City Center Streetscape Design Guidelines. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Design Review Application #DR-07-10. 5 a t 50 5AN DEMO DRIVE, 5OUTH DURLINGTON South Burlington Realty 11/15/2007 Design Review Existing Conditions W. and 5. Facades CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 28, 2007 South Burlington Realty Co. c/o John Jaeger PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 Dear Property Owner Enclosed is a draft agenda for the December 11, 2007 Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, e y� Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 28, 2007 Valerie & Kyle Williams 70 Barrett Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburi.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the December 11, 2007 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, I Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 5o San Reno Ctb,Ne(s At Ck��:pla�n OA C-0, 4T i�- �� Vd �`ic�n kner se) �Cttl Po 6ox 2zczl CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 6, 2007 John Jaeger South Burlington Realty Co. PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: 50 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Jaeger: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday December 11, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, I Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 50 5AN REMO DRIVE, 5OUTH 13UKLINGTON South Burlington Realty 11/15/2007 Design Review Existing Conditions W. and 5. Facades =1 50 5AN REMO DRIVE, 5OUTH 13URLINGTON South Burlington Realty 11/15/2007 Design Review - New Entry Door & Roof , .oil..- I� .ft.�i 1{k e � ridW TO: FROM: DATE: Cc: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 South Burlington Development Review Board Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner, November 27, 2007' John Jaeger, South Burlington Realty Co. Design Review Application DR-07-11 50 San Remo Drive South Burlington Realty, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval for the following exterior modifications: 1) add additional entry door and roof structure over door to west fagade; 2) adjust parking layout. The subject property falls within Design District 2 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D)(1)(b) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the addition or alteration of an exterior wall of a building or structure shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). The Design Review Committee met on November 26, 2007 and unanimously agreed to support the application for approval by the Development Review Board. Design plans for properties within Design District 1 shall comply with the following design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.01(F) of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. (b) Materials used. A wide variety of both natural and high quality man-made materials are allowed. Examples of acceptable materials include red brick, indigenous stone (i.e., granite, limestone), architectural concrete, synthetic stucco, wood clapboard (synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles), and glass or glass block. Other materials may be used as an architectural accent provided they are harmonious with the building and site. (c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors Design Review Application DR-06-02 366 Dorset Street Page 2 of 4 naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. For sides of buildings that face or front public streets, the majority of the first floor's facade area shall consist of see -through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity, however, the windows and doors should be of human scale, so as to welcome pedestrians. The proposed door and roof structure are in compliance with these criteria. The new door and structure are proposed to match the existing door and structure. The extended roof will match the existing roofing over the existing door. (e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. There are no changes proposed to the roof of the existing building as part of this proposal. (f) Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns. New buildings shall be built to the street property line. For existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building better to the public street. Such improvements could include installation of doors and windows facing the public street. There are no changes to the orientation of the proposed building. However, the additional door on the front fagade (west) will enhance the building's compliance with this criterion. (g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application (h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (i) Pedestrian promenade along Market Street. In Design District 1, the provision of a covered pedestrian promenade along Market Street is required in order to protect pedestrians from inclement weather and promote walking. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application Design Review Application DR-06-02 366 Dorset Street Page 3 of 4 In addition, design plans for properties within Design District 2 shall comply with the following site design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.02 of the SBLDR: (a) Landscape and plantings. Significant trees and vegetation should be preserved in its natural state insofar as practicable. Any grade changes should be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (b) Integrate special features with the design. Storage areas, machinery and equipment installation, service areas, truck loading areas, garbage and refuse collection areas, utility connections, meters and structures, mailboxes, and similar accessory structures shall be positioned in such a way to minimize visibility from the public street. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (c) Walls, fences or other screening features: Such elements, if used, shall be employed in a skillful manner and in harmony with the architectural context of the development. Such features should be used to enhance building appearance and to strengthen visual linkages between a building and its surroundings. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (d) Accessible open space. When providing open space on a site, it shall be designed to be visually and physically accessible from the public street. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (e) Provide efficient and effective circulation. With respect to vehicular and pedestrian circulation, special attention shall be given to the location and number of access points to public streets and sidewalks, to the separation of vehicles and pedestrians, to the arrangement of parking areas and to service and loading areas, and to the location of accessible routes and ramps for the disabled. Site design shall also provide for interconnections, both vehicular and pedestrian, between adjacent properties. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (f) Outdoor Lighting. Outdoor lighting shall be designed to be both aesthetically pleasing and functional. The lighting type shall be metal halide, compact fluorescent, and/or induction lamps, and shall be of a white color (e.g., CRI 70 or greater). Light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded to preclude glare and overall illumination levels should be evenly distributed. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the existing outdoor lighting. If any changes are proposed to the outdoor lighting, lighting details (cut -sheets) shall be submitted for review. Design Review Application DR-06-02 366 Dorset Street Page 4 of 4 (g) Provide for nature's events. Attention shall be accorded to design features which address the affects of rain, snow and ice at building entrances and on sidewalks, and to provisions for snow and ice removal from circulation areas. This application is in compliance with this criterion (h) Make spaces secure and safe. With respect to personal safety, all open and enclosed spaces should be designed to facilitate building evacuation, and provide reasonable accessibility by fire, police or other emergency personnel and equipment. The additional door will only serve to enhance the building's compliance with this criterion. (i) Streetscape improvements. An applicant for new development shall be responsible for implementing streetscape improvements (e.g., sidewalks, street lighting, street trees, etc.) within the portion of the public street ROW directly fronting the parcel of land for which development is proposed. Such streetscape improvements shall be in accord with the specifications contained in the City Center Streetscape Design Guidelines. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Design Review Application #DR-07-10. South Burlington Realty Company P.O. BOX 2204 South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2204 (802) 863-9039 December 10, 2007 Raymond J. Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 50 San Remo Drive SP-07-96 Dear Ray: Enclosed are three copies of the revised Site Plan incorporating the following changes: - Bicycle rack has been added. - Snow storage area has been indicated on plan. - Screened Dumpster area has been shown on plan. The enclosure will be 6-foot high stockade fence with hinged doors. - Zoning boundary line has been marked. - Distances from the building to property lines have been added. - One accessible van -capable space has been indicated. - The lighting fixture specification has been added; this represents a change of fixture. We believe the fixture specified is oompliant; if not please let me know so we can change it to one which is. Please let me know if anything else is needed. Thank vou. Prime Real Estate - Commercial, Residential, Industrial Development. Design, Build, Lease, Consulting 50 5AN REMO DRIVE 51TE FLAN South Burlington Realty Company Scale 1" = 20' Rev. 12/10/07 Permit Number DR- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): Y�— Design Plan Approval ❑ Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address,, phone and fax # v y��h ��Q �� y P•� ZZ o`{, �*�1�,i✓IIvLa. 6,, V-1� 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) , �c� m �- 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) h 5) PROJECT STREET ADD SS: ro .S a- V� 2 M ) Dr i V e- 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) l l- a — E) ©,D 5, y 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. r b-D �D o 1 \ V' ✓ � U �'�(OVeY U pd� \ �O W e �fy-v vl`� � 6� _ ice U ll s' ..F tp v .e-r rya a vi vi e ►� D Q e 0 r s c — 1 The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I V x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. S] Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete & Zoning or Designee 2 50 SAN REMO DRIVE ABUTTERS 11/19/2007 OWNER PROPERTY Robert D. Richer 0120-00068 68 Barrett Street Same South Burlington, VT 05403 Valerie and Kyle Williams 0120-00070 70 Barrett Street Same South Burlington, VT 05403 Champlain Oil Company, Inc. 0570-00354C P.O. Box 2126 45 San Remo Drive/ South Burlington, VT 05407 354 Dorset Street Patrick Malone 0570-00055C 122 Gallison Hill Road 55 San Remo Drive Montpelier, VT 05602 South Burlington Realty Company 1490-00040C P.O. Box 2204 40 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT 05407 South Burlington Realty Company 1490-00060C P.O. Box 2204 60 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT 05407 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 2, 2002 John Jaeger South Burlington Realty Co. PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407-2204 Re: Design review application of South Burlington Realty, 50 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Jaeger: Please find enclosed the Findings of Fact and Decision of the Development Review Board approval on October 1, 2002 in regards to the above referenced project. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement to obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months, or this approval is null and void If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, f ' Stephanie A. Smith Associate Planner DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO October 1, 2002 MEETING 4. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit prior to installation of any new signage. 5. Any amendment to the master signage plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 40 Design review application #DR-02-11 of South Burlington Realty seeking design review approval of exterior elevation alterations to the west and south side of a 5,000 square foot structure, 50 San Remo Drive. This project consists of fagade and exterior treatment alterations to the elevations on west and south. Alterations to the metal skin building include: 1) application of vinyl siding to the principal fagade, 2) replacement of two existing windows, 3) replacement of an overhead door, 4) and replacement of an existing solid metal door with a glass door. This property located at 50 San Remo Drive is in the Central District 4 and Design Overlay District 2. It is bounded on the north by Lilly Trucking , on the west by San Remo Drive, on south by Dulux Paints, and on the east by residential development. The intent of Central District is to "encourage the locations of a balanced and coordinated mixture of residential, commercial, public and private uses... It is designed to promote efficient use of land by concentrating mixed uses within a well defined Central District." Non- complying structure: The applicant is requesting design review for a non- complying structure in the Central District 2. The applicant may propose alterations to the fagade and fmishes, Section 26.002 (c) of the zoning regulations. Consistent design: The applicant proposed alterations to only the west and south sides of the structure. The applicant proposed to put vinyl siding on the western elevation only. It was the committee's opinion that the proposed vinyl siding will not bring the structure any closer to compliance, and actually leaves the building less in compliance with regards to consistent design. The committee suggested the applicant replace the fagade with like material and paint the south and west side a uniform color to maintain consistency. Windows and doors: The applicant is proposing two (2) windows on the western fagade (cut sheets enclosed). The committee found the proposed windows acceptable. The applicant is also proposing a new door on western elevation, which is constructed of an undivided pane of glass and a side light. The committee found this acceptable. Materials: Pursuant to Section 24.401 (b), Materials Used, CD2 designation is too "...encourages a wide variety of natural and man-made materials." The applicant proposes to use Norandex Woodsman select vinyl siding. The committee felt the proposed vinyl siding would make the building less consistent with respect to materials. The committee suggested the applicant use a similar material that currently exists on the building. 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEMO October 1, 2002 MEETING Colors and textures: The applicant proposes to use a similar color scheme to what exists on the building. The proposed colors include bronze trim color on windows and doors, brown painted steel roof structures over the doors, and beige vinyl siding on the facade of the building. The committee felt the use of vinyl siding on the facade of the building and no where else on the building was not consistent design. The DRC suggested the applicant use a similar metal skin siding to what is present, and paint the building a uniform color. Human scale design: The applicant proposes design features for snow and water protection over the new door and the overhead door. Staff suggested the door treatment on the facade be anchored to the building, with elbow braces, so the roof does not appear to be floating on the facade. Site design: The applicant provided at the meeting with the DRC an accurate, scaled, site plan of the property showing the location of all features including, screened dumpster locations, parking and location of signage, i.e. all application requirements found in Section 26.10, Site Plan Review. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The site plan and elevations shall be revised to show the changes listed below, and shall require approval by the Director of the Planning and Zoning. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted prior to issuance of a zoning permit. a) The western and southern elevations shall be revised to show elbow brace supports under the proposed roof structures. b) The western elevation shall be revised to show replacement/repair of siding with similar metal skin siding 3) All existing floodlights shall be removed and/or replaced with approved downcasting and shielded fixtures. 4) The southern and western elevations shall be painted a uniform color. 5) This approval of the proposed alterations is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 6) The applicant is required to obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months, pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations, or this approval is null and void. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO October 1, 2002 MEETING 7) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 4) CHASE PROPERTIES & DEVELOPMENT, LTD, FINAL PLAT APPLICATION, 46 BOWDOIN STREET This project consists of constructing a 20,300 square foot general office building. This project located at 46 Bowdoin Street lies within the Industrial Open Space District, Hinesburg Road- North/ View Protection Overlay District, and Conservation Open Space District. The property is bounded on the north and east by undeveloped land, on the south by a proposed public street, and on the west by a private road. Preliminary plat was approved on August 6, 2002 meeting (minutes enclosed). Access/Circulation: Access to the subdivision is provided by a proposed public street known as Swift Street Extension. Bowdoin Street is approved as a private street which connects with Swift Street Extension. Access into Lot #4 is provided via a single 24 foot wide curb cut off Bowdoin Street. Circulation on site is adequate. Lot Coverage/Setbacks: The proposed building coverage is 14.9% (maximum allowed is 30%). The proposed overall coverage is 49.1%(maximum allowed is 50%). The front yard coverage along Swift Street Extension is 3.1% (maximum allowed is 30%). Front yard coverage on Bowdoin Street is proposed at 10.4 % (maximum allowed is 30%). All setbacks requirements are met. Height: The property is located within the Hinesburg Road- North/ View Protection Overlay District. The applicant proposes the building not to exceed the elevation of 370.5 feet above mean sea level. The building cannot exceed an elevation of 412 feet above mean sea level. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $16,220 which is being met. Proposed plantings include Redosier Dogwood, Korean Lilac, Mugo Pine, Sargent Juniper, and Crabapple. CO District/wetland buffer: The plan does shows the required C.O. District/ wetland buffer on sheet C1.1. A portion of the building and parking areas encroach into the buffer area. The Board has the authority to allow this encroachment if the criteria under Section 3.503 (a)-(e) of the zoning regulations are not adversely affected. A report prepared by Jeffery Severson addressing the criteria in Section 3.503 of the zoning regulations is enclosed for your review. The issues of whether to allow the encroachment was not decided at preliminary plat. The NRC reviewed the project for a second time at their August 13, 2002 meeting. Recommendations for approval are enclosed for your review. i7 li(2(a-- �) -6-r,) ��'Q5 ,�� ry UNIVEkSAL ALUMINUM CORP. AAMA CERTIFI0C _ MANUFACTURER WARRANTS (1.00E UA-1 ' CONFORMITY TO ANSI/AAMA 702.9-19n SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR: RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS IDEAL FOR BOTH CONDOMINIUM AND APARTMENT DWELLINGS Series 900 Thermal Single Slide Window 5-0 -Skv, (Drivp-- - W,-&T new d 4o r- U')-1 VJ 5 I ")jtr 1�7 m WE t77 El--ev/mlb Aj E-4EV )fTj t) &� 4 r(, VL — L3v C > 1 G L -GV7n Vl)N A) -03�D s to tA) G- A)T--�-- nCIO VQ-- `JI�1N(s; Viv c,� Y Z)tt cC /,\jOr'av4woo'Lma, Se.(e zT- oY' 'e0CA 10 (,JItiDDwS_` r?Zov��'gl S�ic��►��� UKiveV�al se e--s `�©O or Q b O.hodi��a - r �J v a �o ylZe, &W.& s��r"'ra ,wig Sldci��� biroYlZGct►��t�'-�C ���CFcra mr -2gv4I 13rt\,Dv- a1vAT- Srtee� over D c�(rD & (2 i o-F p vex- e Y-e ss cQe�a- o.v�d o �/ ev� c� oa �s j:r Concept: To give the contractor/builder the most advanced window system with budget in mind. Features: • "�/a" Doubl .Dr Triple _�3tazed • rime — With Fin j • Replacement — No Fi,J • Vertical Stacking • Horizontal Mulling • Frame and Sash Thermally Broken • Complete AAMA Testing • Fixed Glass/Panel System • Brass Adjustable Tandem Sash Rollers • Fin -Seal Weatherstripping • White or�B"ronze PainteFinishes • Extruded Half Screens • Heavy Duty Frame • Self -Locking Latches • One -Way Weep Housing • High Performance Rating Options: • High Performance Low-E Glazing • Internal Colonial Muntins • External Historic Muntins • Custom PPG Colors • Tinted Glass • Interior Snap Trim • Receptor Systems • Panning Systems • 130 and 45" Mulling Systems 808trances — Genera'l Infonynation IE FCO ,.. Hinge Locations A-) T Use hinge program for locations on facto Dim. are from bottom of door to center of pivot prep, with a 84" door opening height. ------- - - - - -- C\L 84" D.O.H. 761/16" C\L -� - - - - I 43'/16" C\L . 10'/16" Bottom of door Dim. are from bottom of jamb to center of hinge with a 84" D.O.H. 11/16" Bottom door clearance ------- - - - - -- j C\L 84" D.O.H. 771, C\L 44" C\L include print out with order. Door Hinge location formulas Reference Only Top Hinge = D.O.H. minus 7", minus bottom door clearance Bottom Hinge = 11 ", minus bottom door clearance 1 Intermediate Hinge = D.O.H. divided by 2, plus 2, minus bottom door clearance 2 Intermediate Hinges = D.O.H. minus 18", divided by 3, plus 11 ", minus bottom door clearance = center line of 1 st intermediate hinge D.O.H. minus 18", divided by 3, times 2, plus 11 ", minus bottom door clearance = center line of 2nd intermediate hinge Frame Hinge location formulas Reference Only Top Hinge = D.O.H. minus 7" Bottom Hinge = 11" 1 Intermediate.Hinge = D.O.H. divided by 2, plus 2 2 Intermediate Hinges = D.O.H. minus 18", divided by 3, plus 11" = center line of 1 st intermediate hinge D.O.H. minus 18", divided by 3, times 2, plus 11 ", minus bottom door clearance = center line of 2nd intermediate hinge Always leave top and bottom hinge locations as above unless customer specifies locations. All EFCO doors have. a 3/32" backset from face of frame to face of door. Permit Number DR- -t_ CITY OF SOUTH BURLNGTONI APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): xDesign Plan Approval 0 Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF RECORD (Name/gas shownondeed, mailing address, phone and fax, #) N h ea �_ / `6 1V Z-�- c) VI` bl -z Z� i �'�(, 3 - 7 fl 3q . Fax DO 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) S 6, V* -Q. 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax e Y 5) PROJECT STREET ADDR1 1 \�Y►�l 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) / q ` b — b 6 D 50-- C-- 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and he'M111fl-5T- % k VVl n i i yr F? w w M ct 6 L--) S a v, J66v- V1, -Fr - e- J -C, c- c- o-F -t I e� 1' 0 Qy\. O V e. v, e-o. d� No aJ e .s r-o 0 Ve V-&P- a 4 C� o ►� Gc )-F 5 's s r �' e ✓) l r4 K C e— The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. r Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 5o S 0.h U Qr ► — We s� ��ev�o��►� Lie� �� s � � e $ - L ; � � � --- p,-cu-I S `:t JZ qt L 9/23/02 MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY, 50 SAN REMO DRIVE I move the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application #DR-02-11 of South Burlington Realty Co. seeking design review approval of exterior elevation an window alterations to the west and south sides of a structure, 50 San Remo, as depicted on a seven (7) page plan, page one entitled "50 San Remo Drive", prepared by John Jaeger, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The site plan and elevations shall be revised to show the changes listed below. Five copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted prior to Development Review Board review. a) The site plan shall be revised to show the location of screened dumpster storage areas. b) The stie plan shall be revised to show a north arrow, a scale. c) The site plan shall be revised to show the on site parking spaces. d) The western and southern elevations shall be revised to show elbow brace supports under the proposed roof structures. 3) All existing floodlights shall be removed and/or replaced with downcasting and shielded fixtures. Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting and shielded fixtures. 4) This recommendation for approval of the proposed alterations is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 5) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Design Review Committee. 6) The applicant is required to obtain approval from the Development Review Board. 7) The western elevation shall be revised to show replacement/repair of siding with similar metal skin siding. 8) The southern and western elevations shall be painted a uniform color. Possible elbow braces for the proposed roof structures at 50 San Remo Drive. Date Received BY Date Application �omplete3and Received By BY CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIL74 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: (a) Owner of Record SO,,-n-t IPUP- �cTO � �rt�r, CC 346, 002S:Pr S► So. -& 0-1; .J&-ro.J V7. 0S4o i (b) Applicant SA•MC- /FS O-j"-jEQ. !_ (c) Contact Person ��Jy6�AS �CNNaIL 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 60 SA4vJ 1P- . 3) PROPOSED USE(S) CoMMER.c„9L- 1,01L-0i-a6- 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e., ; of units, floor area, etc.) 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) UN 44 Nova 4 6) COST ESTIMATES: (a) Buildings not). �l (b) Landscaping %O (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) .000 7) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE DGoveg -it, 1 S 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) VN K- r-w w rA 9) P = HOUR (S) OF OP ERAT ION 10) PEAK DAYS OF OP ERAT ION U kl �-- mot')" 40L)- 15, 6`77 DATE SIGNATURE OF SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY 60 San Remo Drive Area zoned B.P.D. District Section 11.00 Dimensional requirement Minimum setback - 75 feet Proposed setback - 37 feet Minimum side yard - 30 feet Proposed side yard - 15 feet (north) Proposed use Wholesale business - conditional use (Section 8.104) Lot size 100' x 180' average, 80,000 square feet minimum lot size - lot set- off prior to 1974 regulations Section 13.40 offstreet parking -parking required 1 space per 100 square feet of floor area 5,000 square feet - 50 spaces, proposed 12 spaces No Text M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment From: David Spitz, Planner J)N$ Re: South Burlington Realty Corporation application, San Remo Drive Date: November 2, 1979 Upon review of the Planning Commission's minutes of November 22, 1977 for the site plan approval of the South Burlington Realty Corporation application, it appears that the Commission was concerned with the volume of traffic for the type of use that was proposed. The minutes state: "He (Mr. Woolery) said that there would be a lot of cars coming in and going out each time classes changed and he felt that people should be encouraged to move in a circular pattern around the building". As a result, the Commision stipulated the following: "Traffic circulation shall be marked and shall be counterclockwise around the building". The originally approved use, a gymnastics instructional facility, is very different from the currently proposed warehouse in terms of types and volume of traffic. While the Planning Commission has taken no action on the current application, there is no indication that the previously required circular drive is the best traffic layout for the warehouse. The trafficissues must be re- addressed by the Planning Commission if the Zoning Board approves the new conditional use application. DS 11/27/79 STIPULATIONS AND/OR FACT FINDING SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY - SAN REMO DRIVE For the Site Plan application of South Burlington kealty Corporation for a 5,000 square foot commercial building at 60 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a plan entitled "Proposed Building - South Burlington Realty Corporation, Rev. #2" dated November 1979. Stipulations: 1. Cooperation shall be provided, as deemed necessary by the Planning Commission, for connecting parking lots and access to the undeveloped lot to the south. 2. The stipulations of William Szymanski's memo, dated November 21, 1979, shall apply. 3. The stipulations of the Zoning Board shall apply. 4. A landscaping bond of $1,500 shall be provided. 5. This approval expires 6 months from this date. 6 • %� 3zAkc ° )ADMINISTRATIVE CHECKLIST PROJECT NAME/FILE REFERENCE South, Burlington Realty Corporation 1. LETTER OF NOTIFICATION & APPROVAL ~MOTION OR FINDINGS & ORDER 2. BONDING OR ESCROW AGREEMENTS LANDSCAPING SEWER WATER STORM DRAINAGE ROADS CURBS SIDEWALKS (NOTE ALL RELEASES OR AGREEMENT REVISIONS) 3. LIST APPROVALS GRANTEDWITH DATES AND PERMIT INSPECTIONS COMPLETED, ETC.: 4. UTILITY EASEMENTS * BILLS OF SALE RECORDED ACCEPTED 5. CERTIFICATE OF TITLE x 6. ROADWAYS DEEDS FOR CITY STREETS ACCEPTED PRIVATE ROAD & WAIVER AGREEMENT x /i�a7/7P 7. FINAL PLAT OR RECORD COPY - STAMPED ♦ SIGNED, & FILED OR RECORDED 8. PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTS ACCEPTED & RDCORDED FILED 9. MISCELLANEOUS AGREEMENTS LAND FOR ROAD WIDENING OFFER OF IRREVOCABLE DEDICATION FUTURE ACCESS POINTS SHARED ACCESS POINTS OTHER 10. COP_Y OF SURVEY TO ASSESSOR (IF CHANGE IN PROPERTY LINES) 11. FEES - PAID/DATE HEARING BUILDING PERMIT ENGINEERING INSP. SEWER RECREATION (RECORD CALCULATIONS AND DEPOSIT IN ACCOUNT) 12. IMPACT FOLLOW UP I.e., "ON LINE" EVALUATION: SCHOOL KIDS CAR COUNTS 3. PLANNING COI2•IISSION NOVEIiBER 27, 1979 2. Wherever sewer or water mains are located outside of the proposed public street right of way, easements 20 feet in width shall be provided to the city, in form and content satisfactory to the City Attorney. 3. Sewer capacity at the Imperial Drive bottleneck shall be gauged prior to construction of the 70th unit. No subsequent building permit shall be issued until provision is made for adequate sewage flow throu6h the bottleneck. 4. The stipulations of William Szymanski's memo, dated November 21, 1979, shall apply. 5. The final plat shall be recorded within 90 days. , 6. Per the applicant's offer, 1) the streets when completed shall be offered to the city to become public streets and 2 the phase 1 road shall be upgraded in stages to be a 24' pavement with a 30' base. 7. Street access to any development the southern boundary of this property. Mr. Mona seconded the motion. On d2, the 20' easement will consist Mr. Jacob asked about the recreation had been given to the citjr. to the south can be at anv point al of 10';on each side of the lines. fee and was told that 7.6 acres of land Regarding access to land to the south, Mr. Page noted that this developer did not want to be required to accelerate his roadway schedule to accomodate another developer. The motion carried unanimously. Continuation of site plan review of parking lot expansion for McDonald's at 1225 Williston Road Mr. Spitz said the applicant had requested a two week delay. Mr. Woolery moved to continue the site plan review of parking lot expansion for McDonald's'at 1225 Williston Road until two weeks' from tonight, at City Hall, at 7:30 pm. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion and all were in f avor. Site plan review of 5000 square foot commercial building for South Burlington Realty Corporation at 60 San Remo Drive Mr. Douglas Schner said that a similar plan had been submitted to the Planning Commission in November of 1977, but at that time it was to be a building for a gym facility. Now they want to put in warehouse space. This plan has been to the Zoning Board. It was decided that since this is a different use, the drive around the building, formerly for dropping children off, has no use and has been eliminated. A green strip has been added around the north line and the entrance and exit has been altered. The building now is set back 50', as requested by the Zoning Board and 14 parking spaces are shown. There is an existing stockade fence on the east boundary. Plantings will be put in to upgrade the property and the plan for the adjacent vacant lot (also owned by the same company) will be a mirror image of this lot. Yx. Schner shoved the Commission the drainage plan, connecting to the line on San Remo Drive, There might also be a drain under the loading dock area. Wo surface or roof drainage will go onto any other property. Mr. Levesque noted that there was residential land behind this property and he asked that more cedars be put on that line Ethan on the side line, so there will 4. PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 27, 1979 be a good screen in the rear. Mr. Schner said he would be glad to move some of the 33 trees he plans to install to the rear line. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington P1 site plan application of South Burlington Realty Co foot Commission approve the commercial building at 60 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a plan entitled _ osed Building South Burlington Realty Corporation Rev #2" dated ovember 1979. subject to the following stipulations: 1. Cooperation shall be provided, as deemed necessary by the Planning Commission,. for connecting parking lots and access to the undeveloped lot to the south. 2. The stipulations of William Szymanski's memo, dated November 21, 1979, shall apply. 3. The stipulations of the Zoning Board shall apply. 4. A landscaping bond of S1,500 shall be provided. 5. This approval expires 6 months from this date. 6. The applicant agrees to put cedars 4-5' high 3' on center across the rear of the property, N Mr. Mona seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Sketch plan review of application by Homer Dubois for a 1 lot subdivision on Hinesburg Road Mr. Spitz said the proposed lot was 2000' deep and had 200' of frontage. He located the property for the Commission. The Commission felt strongly that it needed to see a plan for the whole area. Mr. Dubois is asking to set off a 10 acre lot from a parcel of 90 acres and the Commission wanted to know how the rest of the acreage would be used. They do not want spaghetti lots like the one proposed. Possibilities such as running a cul-de-sac road into the center of the 90 acres and making lots (square) off that short road were mentioned, as was holding some of that land in common,.but the Commission was firm in wanting to see a conceptual plan for the whole parcel. Mr. Jacob felt that 10 acre lots were a waste of land and he recommended looking into ways to set off 5 or even 3 acre lots. It was also pointed out that normally, if there are 5 or more houses on a street, the city has asked that that be a city street. Sketch plan review of aprlication by Gregory and Daughters for 6-lot industrial park across from Muddy Brook Industrial Park on Williston Road Mr. Robert Krebs said that there had been some concern about the original lot layout and that it had been changed so the lots are more uniform. Each lot has the required area, and there is a 60' right of way with a 32' road and a cul- de-sac at the end with an 80' diameter. They have talked to the State about getting traffic out onto Williston Road. Green Mountain Power has a utility easement over the land and there is a 100' setback from Muddy Brook. At some point the proposed road might be extended to Shunpike Road. ::r. Gregory might use lot 4 himself for equipment storage. That lot is tight, but there is some buildable area and the GMP poles could be moved to give them more area. 1 P M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David Spitz, City Planner Re: Next Week's Agenda Items Date: 11/21/79 #2 Windridge Apartments at 200 Kennedy Drive Sidewalk has been relocated at the fill area to a distance of 4 feet from the road. Culvert beneath additional fill will be extended as needed. Ill- uminated sign has been added at the entrance to the property. #3 Stonehedge, Phase II Plans for loop road have been upgraded to a 24' paved width and 30' base. Minor revisions must be made, such as reducing the sharpness of curves (by in- creasing curve radii from 150' to 200'), so that loop road may be acceptable as a city -treet. Second entrances have been added to several clusters as requested by fire chief to improve accessibility for fire fighting. #4 McDonald's at 1225 Williston Road City Attorney's opinion is that McDonald's proposed lease of land from the Citgo station will increase the degree of nonconformity of the Citgo lot in violation of the City's zoning regulation. Therefore the City Attorney re- commends denial of the application. #5 South Burlington Realty, San Remo Drive On November 22 1977, the Planning Commission gave site plan approval for a gymnastics instructional facility at this site. For that type of use a circular drive was required. However, for the currently proposed warehouse - commercial building with limited traffic and no children involved, a circular drive no longer appears necessary Zoning Board has granted variance to allow fifty foot setback with stip- ulation., that uses be those permitted in the BPD zone and that parking spaces be 14 as shown. If applicant requests a conditionaluse, he must return for Zoning Board review. Loading dock is in front with sufficient setback for any trailer trucks to be off the street when unloading. Drainage is towards the front of the lot. Applicant has left room in parking lot for connection to adjacent undeveloped lot. #6 Dubois, 1 lot Subdivision Proposed new lot is located on the west side of Hinesburg Road across the road from other lots previously subdivded by Dubois. Lot has 203' road frontage and a depth of 2175, considerably greater than the 5 to 1 length to width guideline of Section 402 of the Subdivision Regulations. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Next Week's Agenda Items Date: 11/21/79 #2 Windridge 1. Plan layout is acceptable. #3 Stonehedge • 1. Road curve radii shall be a minimum of 200 feet and superelevated. 2. Curbs should be constructed in the inside of curves at 15' from center line to protect road edge. 3. Opening at cul-du-sac should be 30' in width with radii curbed. #5 South Burlington Realty, San Remo Drive 1. Surface drainage should be intercepted and discharged to the street storm drainage system. No surface or roof drainage should be allowed to dis- charge onto adjacant properties. 2. Curb opening shall be constructed with concrete depressed curbing. #6 Homer Dubois Subdivision, Hinesburg Road 1. This is a subdivision of a large parcel of land on a road that carries heavy truck traffic. Road opening should be carefully planned. It would be my preference to see a plan developed for Mr. Dubois's entire parcel with con- sideration given for future streets and a single road access to Hinesburg Road possibly opposite to the R.O.W. that is reserved for a future street when the east side was sub -divided several years ago. #7 Gregory& Daughters, Industral Park, Williston Road 1. A turnaround should be provided. 2. A street R.O.W. should be reserved for future continuation of the street to the R.D.R. property. 3. State Highway permit will be required for access to Williston Road. 4. Sewage disposal will have to be on site unless a pumping station is installed with a force main to the existing gravity system.