The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0040 San Remo Drive0 southburnton. PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number DR- - 0/ (office use onl APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW (NON -SIGN) All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) South Burlinqton Realtv Company, PO Box 2204, S. Burlington, VT 05407-2204 863-9039 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #)Tim Mckenzie South Burlinqton Realtv PO Box 2204 S. Burlington, VT 05407-2204 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) same 3a) CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS tim(cDsouthburlintonrealty.com 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS:40 San Remo Drive 5) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) Lte '' %y 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) General project description (explain what you want approval for): a t4 ! Jn f % yX � � / �G �i � �'C��l C ,plc:. �Zi _,�, AF= i 9) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format)A I /� 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com copy of the plans must be submitted. The application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. -.____ -SIGN u RIE OF APP ICANT SIGNAT OF PkOPERTf OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Administrative Officer Date The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Design Review Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 III TMC Services, Inc. One William Way Bellingham, MA 02019 TEL: (508) 966-3737 FAX: (508) 966-4861 www.hazmatt.com March 31, 2008 Attn: City Clerk City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear City Clerk: Environmental Remediation Services Waste T&D Lab Pack Services Industrial Cleaning Emergency Response Construction Pump & Tank Sewer Systems Drainage Improvements Septic Systems Water Systems Abatement Asbestos Lead Microbial Demolition Emergency Response Per the instructions on the State of Maine Hazardous Waste Transporter License Application, TMC Services, Inc. (TMC) is forwarding a copy of our license application to you. TMC submitted this application to the State of Maine Department of Environmental Protection on March 31, 2008. Please retain this for your files. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 508-966-3737. Thank you! Sincerely, Tina Cameron Transportation & Disposal Coordinator Application for Waste Oil and Hazardous Waste Transporter License Presented to State of Maine Department of Environmental Protection And to the attention of: Stacy A. Ladner, Unit Manger Oil and Hazardous Waste Facilities Regulations Division Presented By TMC Services, Inc. One William Way Bellingham, MA 02019 TMC Services, Inc. March 31, 2008 MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF REMEDIATION & WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION OF OIL & HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES REGULATION 17 STATE HOUSE STATION Application Number Augusta, Maine 04333-0017 Telephone: (207)287-2651 APPLICATION FOR A WASTE OIL AND HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSPORTER LICENSE Your application package contains 3 application forms. Please use a typewriter or print clearly using a ball point pen. Forward the original to the Maine Department of Environmental Protection, one copy to the Municipal office of the City or Town where the business is Located (if more than one Location, make copies of the application and forward to each municipal office) and retain one copy for your records. Applications improperly prepared may be returned to the applicant for correction. SECTION 1 1(a) NOTE: Persons who transport greater than 1,000 gallons of waste oil per calendar month for the purpose of resale are waste oil dealers and are required to obtain a waste oil transporter license. Application Information TMC Services Inc. Name Bellingham Norfolk City/Town County I(b) 04-3270089 One William Way IRS Tax Identification # Mailing Address (Street and Number) Massachusetts 02019 (508) 966-3737 State Zip Code Telephone Number 1(c) Location of Business (if different from above address) County State Street and Number Zip Code City/Town Telephone Number 1(d) If the business is being operated from several locations, please attach a sheet of plan bond paper, size 8'/z" x 11', on which is listed the entire address of each business location including Street & Number, City/Town, County, State, Zip Code and Telephone Number. 1(e) If the applicant has received an identification number from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), please list that number. If no EPA identification number has been received, applicant should contact DEP for assistance in obtaining an EPA ID number. MAR000502138 EPA Identification Number 1(f) Key Contact Person in Event of Emergency Matthew C. Clark (800) 223-8865 Name Emergency Phone Number One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 Address SECTION 2. Hazardous Waste and Waste Oil Information In the columns listed below, please enter information concerning Hazardous Wastes and Waste Oil Transported by type (solvents, plastics, heavy metals, PCBs, etc.), Customers by Type of Industry (leather, paper, etc.) and Destination of wastes. 2(a) Type of Waste Transported 2(b) Type of Customers Served 2(c) Destination Aqueous and non -aqueous hazardous wastes Residential, various industrial, Please refer to Attachment 2(c) except radioactive and biological waste. and commercial customers. Off -specification and specification used oil and waste oil for disposal or recycling SECTION 3. Conveyance Operator Information In the column below, please list the operator(s) of your company's conveyance that you are applying to license. 3(b) Maine or Other State 3(a) Operator's Name Operator's License Number(s) 3(c) Tvoe of Operator License(s) Held (ex., Class I) Please refer to Attachlment 3(a),(b) (c) 3(d) Submit a copy of the past three (3) years' driving record from each of the operators listed on the application: This must be an official record or an attested copy of motor vehicle violations issued by the State Motor Vehicle Department where each operator is licensed. This record may not be more than three (3) months old. SECTION 4. Conveyance Information Page 1 of 2 "Conveyance" means any vehicle used for transportation of hazardous waste, waste oil on land, water, or in the air. For the requirements of the license, the term includes only the cargo carrying portion of a conveyance. (FOR EXAMPLE: IN THE CASE OF A TRACTOR/TRAILER COMBINATION, ONLY THE TRAILER IS REQUIRED TO BE LICENSED.) Listed below are columns (a) through 0) which provide detailed information on each conveyance used to transport hazardous waste or waste oil. Column (h) refers to the address/location if a conveyance is used for temporary storage of waste oil prior to proceeding to the destination point. (Temporary storage means for not more than 24 hours.) 4a Year 4(b) Make Conv.1 2002 Ford Conv.2 2003 Ford Conv.3 2004 Isuzu Conv.4 1994 Mack Conv.5 2002 Mack Conv.6 2003 Mack Conv.7 2005 Mack 4(f)Capacity 4(g) Type Hazardous 4(c) Type (e.g. trailer) 4(d) Serial Number 4(e) Registration No. (Volume) Waste/Oil Transported Rock Body Truck 1FDAF56F62EA29256 MA M21135 20 drums Please refer to Sect. 2(a) Rack Body Truck 1FDAF56P83EC20980 MA K18155 20 drums Please refer to Sect. 2(a) Box Truck JALC4814747008381 VT BDL432 20 drums Please refer to Sect. 2(a) Dump Truck Dump Truck Straight Dump Truck Straight Dump Truck 4g) Address Where the Conveyance is Stored Conv.I One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 Conv.2 One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 Conv.3 40 San Remo br in 5 Burlington, VT 06468 Conv.4 One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 Conv.5 One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 Conv.6 One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 Conv.7 One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 1MM67C3RM017257 MA 44805 18 cubic yds Hazardous 6 non-hoz soils WAG11CO2M001025 MA 57276 18 cubic yds Hazardous Q non-haz soils WAG11C53M004682 MA 61232 20 cubic yds Hazardous d non-hoz soils 1M2AG11C65M018092 MA 64632 20 cubic yds Hazardous &non-haz soils 4(i) Is the Conveyance a motorized vehicle or strictly a carrying Conveyance'? 4I) Address Where Conveyance is Used for Temporary Storage (e.g. VAC Truck or Trailers) One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 Motorized Vehicle One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 Motorized Vehicle 40 San Remo Dr in 5 Burlington, VT 06468 Motorized Vehicle One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 Motorized Vehicle One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 Motorized Vehicle One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 Motorized Vehicle Motorized Vehicle SECTION 4. Conveyance Information Page 2 of 2 "Conveyance" means any vehicle used for transportation of hazardous waste, waste oil on land, water, or in the air. For the requirements of the license, the term includes only the cargo carrying portion of a conveyance. (FOR EXAMPLE: IN THE CASE OF A TRACTOR/TRAILER COMBINATION, ONLY THE TRAILER IS REQUIRED TO BE LICENSED.) Listed below are columns (a) through 0) which provide detailed information on each conveyance used to transport hazardous waste or waste oil. Column (h) refers to the address/location if a conveyance is used for temporary storage of waste oil prior to proceeding to the destination point. (Temporary storage means for not more than 24 hours.) 4(f)Capacity 4(g) Type Hazardous 4a Year 4(b) Make 4(c) Type (e.g. trailer) 4(d) Serial Number 4(e) Reaistration No. (Volume) Waste/Oil Transported Conv.1 2005 Sterling Vacuum Truck 2FZHAZDA25AV18245 MA 65973 3,400 gals Please refer to Sect.2(a) Conv.2 1993 Kenworth Vacuum Truck 1NKDLAOXBPJ587787 CT 41599A 3,400 gals Please refer to Sect. 2(a) Conv.3 2005 Freightliner Dump Truck 1FVMC51)E25HU47843 CT 41600A 16 cubic yds Hazardous & non-haz soils Conv.4 2006 Freightliner Vacuum Truck 1FVACXC526HV55418 CT 41597A 2,500gals Please refer toSect. 2(a) Conv.5 1992 Freightliner Vacuum Truck 1FVX6WY90NH507058 MA 70490 3,400 gals Please refer toSect. 2(a) Conv.6 1991 Ford Vactor Truck 1F1)ZW90L7MVA30105 MA 65895 12 cubic yds Hazardous & non-haz soils Conv.7 1993 Ford Vactor Truck 1FDZW90T8PVA05122 MA 74501 12 cubic yds Hazardous & non-haz soils 42) Address Where the Convevance is Stored Conv.I One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 Conv.2 One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 Conv.3 One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 Conv.4 40 5an Remo Dr in 5 Burlington, VT 06468 Conv.5 One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 Conv.6 One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 Conv.7 One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 4h) Address Where Conveyance is Used for Temporary Storage One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 40 San Remo Dr in 5 Burlington, VT 06468 One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 One William Way in Bellinhgam, MA 02019 4(i) Is the Conveyance a motorized vehicle or strictly a carrying Conveyance? (e.a. VAC Truck or Trailers Motorized Vehicle Motorized Vehicle Motorized Vehicle Motorized Vehicle Motorized Vehicle Motorized Vehicle Motorized Vehicle SECTION 5. Evidence of Liability Insurance Coverage (Applicants must submit a copy of their current insurance certificate covering their waste oil and hazardous waste transportation operations). In no event shall the limit of liability be less than $500,000. Liability insurance coverage amounts must be exclusive of legal defense costs. NOTE,: Updated certificates must be submitted whenever a renewal application is filed, when the insurance coverage is renewed, or an amended insurance certificate is issued. SECTION 6. Applicant's Compliance History with Environmental Laws: Environmental Permits Held (New England) (except for transporter operator and conveyance permits). Hazardous Waste Transporter Hazardous Waste Transporter Hazardous Waste Transporter Hazardous Waste Transporter Hazardous Waste Transporter Environmental Permits Revoked or Suspended (other than New England) (if not already covered above). There are none. Environmental Permit Enforcement Action (other than New England) (if not already covered above). Hazardous Waste Transporter - NY Expiration Date 3/11/2009 Expiration Date State of Issuance 6/30/08 Connecticut 12/31/11 Massachusetts 6/30/08 New Hampshire 6/30/08 Rhode Island 6/30/08 Vermont Enforcement Action (if yes, please attach a copy of the action). Reason for Revocation or Suspension Enforcement Action Taken Hazardous waste manifest and permit regulations. Settlement with NY5 DEC. Citation issued SECTION 7. Operational History A. Safety History Please describe in writing all incidents of waste oil and hazardous material releases to the environment or accidents involving waste oil, hazardous waste material that your business, operators, or conveyances have been involved in within the last five years. Please include dates and locations. There are none. B. Training Program Please describe below the training program in operation at your business for the safe transportation of hazardous waste and waste oil. Include the specific training that the operators listed in Section 2 have received regarding the safe transportation of hazardous waste and waste oil (attach additional sheets as necessary). All drivers participate in monthly training programs designed to meet the requirements of 49 CFR 172, 29 CFR 1910.120 and the HazMat regulations. The training programs are designed by our in-house expert and delivered with a combination of hands-on and classroom instruction. Outside trainers are routinely involved in the training to offer additional program variety. Drivers are instructed in equipment use, emergency procedures, manifesting, DOT and EPA requirements and driving safety, among other cs. C. Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan (SPCA Does your company have an SPCC Plan? x YES NO If yes, please attach a copy to this application. SECTION 8. Attach applicable license fee (make check or money order payable to: Hazardous Waste Fund -Transporter Account) Fee Schedule is as follows: $100.00 for a basic license which covers one conveyance, one operator, and one business location. Each additional license not covered by the basic license costs: Conveyance license $50.00 Operator license $50.00 Location license $50.00 8(a) Amount Submitted $ 1,200.00 8(b) Check or Money Order Number 113011 SECTION 9. Certification I, the undersigned, hereby certify that all information contained in this license application is true. I also certify that I and all conveyance operators in my employment are familiar with and will comply with and complete all standard and special conditions attached to this license including those contained in Chapter 860, Section #9 and Chapter 853, paragraph 8 of the DEP Rules. (NOTE: There are substantial penalties for falsification or misrepresentation of information submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection as part of any license application. Applicants are reminded to submit all changes to license application data as they occur in order for their license to remain valid.) Signature Matthew C. Clark, CEO Typed Name of Applicant One William Way Address (Street & Number) Bellingham MA 02019. City or Town State Zip Code (508) 966-3737 Telephone Number W OT-HAZ/l lg 8/00 I TMC Services, Inc. Environmental Construction Abatement One William Way Remediation Services Pump & Tank Asbestos Bellingham, MA 02019 Waste T&D Sewer Systems Lead Lab Pack Services Drainage Improvements Microbial TEL: (508) 966-3737 FAX: (508) 966-4861 Industrial Cleaning Septic Systems Demolition Iwwwhazmatt.com Emergency Response Water Systems Emergency Response ATTACHMENT 1(d) BUSINESS LOCATIONS Cornorate Headquarters: TMC Services, Inc. One William Way Bellingham, MA 02019 County: Norfolk Phone: 800-223-8865 Service Center Locations: A) TMC Services, Inc. 20 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 County: Chittenden Phone: 802-863-5300 B) TMC Services, Inc. 127 Enterprise Drive Monroe, CT 06468 County: Fairfield Phone: 203-268-7046 l TMC Services, Inc. 1 I I I I I I ATTACHMENT 2(c) DESTINATION LIST OF DISPOSAL FACILITIES Handler Detail 2/22/2008 3:17:02PM Hdlr Addr Type Type Name Address City State Zip EPA Id Phone Fax Contact Name F Mail Aggregate Industries 1101 Turnpike Street Stoughton MA 02072 MAD981213531 7813415500 Bill Reinhardt F Site Aggregate Industries 1101 Turnpike Street Stoughton MA 02072 MAD981213531 7813415500 Bill Reinhardt F Mail American Reclamation Corporation 130 Sturbridge Road Charlton MA 01507 MAD982201055 508-393-6333 Toby Tyler F Site American Reclamation Corporation 130 Sturbridge Road Charlton MA 01507 MAD982201055 508-393-6333 Toby Tyler F Mail Aggregate Recycling Corporation P.0 Box 363 Elliot ME 03903 207.439-5584 207-439-5586 John Doherty F Site Aggregate Recycling Corporation 434 Dow Highway Elliot ME 03903 207-439-5584 207-439-5586 GF Mail Bridgeport United Recycling, Inc. 50 Cross Street Bridgeport CT 06610 CTDO02593887 800-404-4408 GF Site Bridgeport United Recycling, Inc. 50 Cross Street Bridgeport CT 06610 CTDO02593887 800-404-4408 Walter Terolli F Mail Bridgeport United Recycling 24-40 Seaview Avenue Bridgeport CT 06607 CTD981203888 20-382-5586 F Site Bridgeport United Recycling 24-40 Seaview Avenue Bridgeport CT 06607 CTD981203888 20-382-5586 F Mail Clean Harbors of Braintree 385 Quincy Avenue Braintree MA 02184 MAD053452637 781-380-7100 F Site Clean Harbors of Braintree One Hill Avenue Braintree MA 02184 MAD053452637 781-380-7100 F Mail Commercial Recycling Systems, In 2 Gibson Road Scarborough ME 04074 MEX020000000 207-883-3325 F Site Commercial Recycling Systems, In 2 Gibson Road Scarborough ME 04074 MEX020000000 207-883-3325 F Mail Complete Recycling Solutions, LLC One Father DeValles Boulevard, Fall River MA 02723 MAR000510123 508-402-7700 508-402-7750 Unit 7 F Site Complete Recycling Solutions, LLC One Father DeValles Boulevard, Fall River MA 02723 MAR000510123 508-402-7700 508-402-7750 Unit 7 F Mail Conigliaro Industries 701 Waverly Street Framingham MA 01702 (508) 872-9668 F Site Conigliaro Industries 701 Waverly Street Framingham MA 01702 (508) 872-9668 F Mail Covanta SEMASS 141 Cranberry Highway West Wareham MA 02576 508-291-4400 F Site Covanta SEMASS 141 Cranberry Highway West Wareham MA 02576 508-291-4400 F Mail GNBRRMD 300 Samuel Barnet Blvd. New Bedford MA 02745 508-998-5674 Hank Van Laarhoven F Site Crapo Hill Landfill 300 Samuel Barnet Blvd. New Bedford MA 02745 508-998-5674 Hank Van Laarhoven TF Mail CWM Chemical Services, LLC 1550 Balmer Road Model City NY 14107 NYD049836679 716-754-8231 TF Site CWM Chemical Services, LLC 1550 Balmer Road Model City NY 14107 NYD049836679 716-754-8231 F Mail Cycle Solve 167 Mill Street Cranston RI 02905 000000000000 800-358-0065 F Site Cycle Solve 167 Mill Street Cranston RI 02905 000000000000 800-358-0065 F Mail Cycle -Chem, Inc. 217 South First Street Elizabeth NJ 07206 NJD002200046 908-355-5800 F Site Cycle -Chem, Inc. 217 South First Street Elizabeth NJ 07206 NJD002200046 908-355-5800 TF Mail CYN Oil Corporation 1771 Washington St P.0 Box 119 Stoughton MA 02072 MAD082303777 781-341-5108 TF Site CYN Oil Corporation 1771 Washington St P.0 Box 119 Stoughton MA 02072 MAD082303777 781-341-5108 (c) 2005 Terralink Software Systems, Inc. 1 Handler Detail Hdlr Addr Type Type Name Address City State Zip EPA Id Phone Fax 2/22/2008 3:17:02 P M Contact Name TF Mail ENPRO Services of Maine, Inc. 106 Main Street Portland ME 04106 MED019051069 207-799-0850 TF Site ENPRO Services of Maine, Inc. 106 Main Street Portland ME 04106 MED019051069 207-799-0850 F Mail Environmental Compliance Corpora 441 R Canton Street Stoughton MA 02072 MAD062179890 781-297-3530 781-344-3020 F Site Environmental Compliance Corpora 441 R Canton Street Stoughton MA 02072 MAD062179890 781-297-3530 781-344-3020 F Mail Enviro-Safe Corporation (NE), Inc. 263 Howard Street Lowell MA 01852 MAD047075734 978-453-7772 978-453-7775 Mike Hoye F Site Enviro-Safe Corporation (NE), Inc. 263 Howard Street Lowell MA 01852 MAD047075734 978-453-7772 978-453-7775 Mike Hoye F Mail Michigan Disposal Waste Tmt. Plant 49350 N. 1-94 Service Drive Belleville MI 48111 MID000724831 800-592-5489 F Site Michigan Disposal Waste Tmt. Plant 49350 N. 1-94 Service Drive Belleville MI 48111 MID000724831 800-592-5489 F Mail Environmental Soil Management In 67 International Drive Loudon NH 03307 DESSWSP96002 603-783-0228 Mike Phelps F Site Environmental Soil Management In 67 International Drive Loudon NH 03307 DESSWSP96002 603-783-0228 Mike Phelps GF Mail General Chemical Corporation 133-138 Leland Street Framingham MA 01702 MAD019371079 508-872-5000 508-875-5271 Michael Wedge GF Site General Chemical Corporation 133-138 Leland Street Framingham MA 01702 MAD019371079 508-872-5000 508-875-5271 Michael Wedge F Mail Horizon Environmental Inc. 120 Rt. 155 Grandes Piles QC GOXIHO NYR000078964 800-545-7657 F Site Horizon Environmental Inc. 120 Rt. 155 Grandes Piles QC GOXIHO NYR000078964 800-545-7657 F Mail Norlite Corporation 628 South Saratoga Avenue Cohoes NY 12047 NYD080469935 800-234-0401 F Site Norlite Corporation 628 South Saratoga Avenue Cohoes NY 12047 NYD080469935 800-234-0401 F Mail Northland Environmental, Inc. 275 Allens Avenue Providence RI 02905 RID040098352 401-781-6340 401-781-9710 Dan Ziobro F Site Northland Environmental, Inc. 275 Allens Avenue Providence RI 02905 RID040098352 401-781-6340 401-781-9710 Dan Ziobro F Mail National Environmental Services, 1 343 Washington Street Norwood MA 02458 MAD059733378 800-407-7779 617-243-3097 Kevin Pallotta F Site Olson's Greenhouses, Inc. 590 South Street East Raynham MA 02767 MAD059733378 617-594-3005 508-977-0473 Fred Teceno F Mail Ontario County Landfill 3555 Post Farm Road Stanley NY 14561 nter EPA # 585-526-4420 585-526-5459 Joe Boyles F Site Ontario County Landfill 3555 Post Farm Road Stanley NY 14561 nter EPA # 585-526-4420 585-526-5459 Joe Boyles F Mail Phoenix P.0 Box 1750 Waterbury CT 06721 F Site Phoneix Soil LLC 130 Freight Street Waterbury CT 06702 203-759-0053 F Mail PineTree Landfill 358 Emerson Mill Road Hampden ME 04444 207-862-4200 F Site PineTree Landfill 358 Emerson Mill Road Hampden ME 04444 207-862-4200 F Mail Pollution Control Industries 4343 Kennedy Avenue East Chicago IL 46312 IND000646943 800-388-7242 F Site Pollution Control Industries 4343 Kennedy Avenue East Chicago IL 46312 IND000646943 800-388-7242 F Mail Pondview Recycling 1 Dexter Road East Providenc RI 02914 EXEMPT999999 F Site Pondview Recycling 1 Dexter Road East Providenc RI 02914 EXEMPT999999 F Mail Rhode Island Resource Recovery C 65 Shun Pike Johnston RI 02919 401-942-1430 401-946-5174 Dan Szetela F Site Johnston Central Landfill 65 Shun Pike Johnston RI 02919 401-942-1430 401-946-5174 Dan Szetela (c) 2005 Terralink Software Systems, Inc. 2 Handler Detail 2/22/2008 3:17:02PM Hdlr Addr Type Type Name Address City State Zip EPA Id Phone Fax Contact Name F Mail Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. 3700 LaGrange Road Smithfield KY 40068 KYD053348108 502.845-2453 F Site Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. 3700 LaGrange Road Smithfield KY 40068 KYD053348108 502-845-2453 F Mail Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. 1200 Sylvan Street Linden NJ 07036 NJD002182897 908-862-2000 F Site Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. 1200 Sylvan Street Linden NJ 07036 NJD002182897 908-862-2000 F Mail Stablex Canada, Inc 760 Industriel Blvd. Blainville, Queb PQ 734 NYD980756415 450.430-9230 F Site Stablex Canada, Inc 760 Industriel Blvd. Blainville, Queb PQ 734 NYD980756415 450-430-9230 F Mail TCI of Alabama, LLC 101 Parkway East Pell City AL 35125 ALD983167891 205-338-9997 Bruce Vetro F Site TCI of Alabama, LLC 101 Parkway East Pell City AL 35125 ALD983167891 205-338-9997 Bruce Vetro F Mail TCI of New York, LLC 39 Falls Industrial Park Road Hudson NY 12534 NYD986899912 518-828-9997 F Site TCI of New York, LLC 39 Falls Industrial Park Road Hudson NY 12534 NYD986899912 518-828-9997 GTF Mail TMC Services, Inc. One William Way Bellingham MA 02019 MAR000502138 508-966-3737 508-966-4861 Norm Gerrie GTF Site TMC Services, Inc. One William Way Bellingham MA 02019 MAR000502138 508-966-3737 508-966-4861 Norm Geme F Mail Trans -Cycle Industries, Inc. 101 Parkway East Pell City AL 35125 ALD983167891 205-338-9997 F Site Trans -Cycle Industries, Inc. 101 Parkway East Pell City AL 35125 ALD983167891 205-338-9997 F Mail Transformer Service, Inc. P.O. Box 1077 Concord NH 03302 NHDO18902874 603-224-4006 603-228-2430 Ken Rust F Site Transformer Service, Inc. 74 Regional Drive Concord NH 03302 NHDO18902874 603-224-4006 603-228-2430 Ken Rust F Mail United Oil Recovery, Inc. 410 Shattuck Way Newington NH 03801 NHD980521843 603-431-2420 F Site United Oil Recovery, Inc. 410 Shattuck Way Newington NH 03801 NHD980521843 603-431-2420 TF Mail United Industrial Services 14 Main Street Meriden CT 06450-0902 CTD021816889 888-276-0886 Richard Vovcsko TF Site United Oil Recovery, Inc. 136 Gracey Avenue Meriden CT 06451 CTD021816889 203-238-6751 F Mail Wayne Disposal, Inc 1349 Hurnon St S. Bellville MI 48197 MID048090633 313-480-8085 F Site Wayne Disposal, Inc 1349 Humon St S. Bellville MI 48197 MID048090633 313-480-8085 F Mail Waste Management New England L 4 Liberety Lane West Hampton NH 03842 DESSWSP95001 603-330-2181 Heather Sidmore F Site Waste Management Turnkey Landf 97 Rochester Neck Road Rochester NH 03830 DESSWSP95001 603-330-2181 Heather Sidmore F Mail Zecco, Inc. 345 West Main Street Northboro MA 01532 MAD052924495 508-351-9660 508-351-9524 F Site Zecco, Inc. 345 West Main Street Northboro MA 01532 MAD052924495 508-351-9660 508-351-9524 (c) 2005 Terralink Software Systems, Inc. 3 TMC Services, Inc. One William Way Bellingham, MA 02019 TEL: (508) 966-3737 FAX: (508) 966-4861 www.hazmatt.com Environmental Remediation Services Waste T&D Lab Pack Services Industrial Cleaning Emergency Response ATTACHMENT 3 (a), (b), (c) Construction Pump & Tank Sewer Systems Drainage Improvements Septic Systems Water Systems CONVEYANCE OPERATOR INFORMATION Abatement Asbestos Lead Microbial Demolition Emergency Response ° Name 0perator's kicei7se Ntrrnhcr "Fype f' Operator- license f Teld Glen Dalpe........................................._..........................._. MA S30873141 ...................................................._.._................_.........._....._..........................._................................._........_........................_...................................... CDL_ MichaelMeehan MA S56041....... ............................ .............................._..._......................................................................................... Brian Ouellette VT S21811840 ........................._._...._....................._.__............_...._...._...._....._..................._ CDL _Kenneth Semerjan MA S14380561 ...._........_.._.__....................._..__......_.__..._..._.._........._____........_.................._............. CDL_ Lawrence Thornton ............................................................................................................................................................................ RI 2419178 _..................................................................................................................................................... CDL -..._.......................................... Michael Tabarani MA S23050636 .........._.._.........................__.._..--.._.........._...._..._.--_...................................--_.. CDL _ Anthony Cicchetti ..........................................................................................................................................................._....................._............................._......................................_._..............................._.................................._......................................_ RI 9270907 CDL Gregory Masiello...........................................................RI... 92206154 ..............................._...................................-..................... _. CDL. Page: 1 Document Name: untitled 02/19/2008 09:56 MASSACHUSETTS REGISTRY OF MOTOR VEHICLES UGM0021 MERIT RATING BOARD - SDIP STATEMENT DISPLAY FUNCTION: UMIQ MSG: INQUIRY HAS BEEN PROCESSED ------------------------ INQUIRY FOR INFORMATION ONLY ------------------------ COMPANY DATA: SOURCE MRB POLICY DATA: EFF DATE 02/19/2008 EXP DATE INQ TYPE 9 TRANS DATE 02/19/2008 COV CODE MKT IND TOWN CODE PROCESS DATE 02/19/2008 --------- OPERATOR ---------- ---------- DRIVING HISTORY INFORMATION ---------- LICENSE INCIDENT SURCHARGE NUMBER ST DESCRIPTION DATE DATE VALUE -------------------------- ------------------------------------------- --- S30873141 MA STARTING DATE 02/19/2002 00 DALPE 07/15/1960,06,Y, (NO INCIDENTS) 00 EXCELLENT DRIVER+ 99 KEY: "F" FOR NXT OPER "C" FOR LIC# LIST "N" FOR NXT INQ F OPERATOR 01 OF 01 Date: 2/19/2008 Time: 10:03:34 AM Page: 1 Document Name: untitled 02/19/2008 10:00 MASSACHUSETTS REGISTRY OF MOTOR VEHICLES UGM0021 MERIT RATING BOARD - SDIP STATEMENT DISPLAY FUNCTION: UMIQ MSG: INQUIRY HAS BEEN PROCESSED ------------------------ INQUIRY FOR INFORMATION ONLY ------------------------ COMPANY DATA: SOURCE MRB POLICY DATA: EFF DATE 02/19/2008 EXP DATE INQ TYPE 9 TRANS DATE 02/19/2008 COV CODE MKT IND TOWN CODE PROCESS DATE 02/19/2008 --------- OPERATOR ---------- ---------- DRIVING HISTORY INFORMATION ---------- LICENSE INCIDENT SURCHARGE NUMBER ST DESCRIPTION DATE DATE VALUE -------------------------- ------------------------------------------- --- S56041638 MA STARTING DATE 02/19/2002 00 MEEHAN 04/15/1983,06,Y, SPEEDING 07/05/2003 10/16/2003 00 IMPROP BACKING 10/23/2003 11/10/2003 02 SPEEDING 02/06/2007 02/26/2007 02 FAILURE TO STOP 06/24/2007 08/24/2007 02 OPERATOR SDIP POINTS 06 KEY: "F" FOR NXT OPER "C" FOR LIC## LIST "N" FOR NXT INQ F OPERATOR 01 OF 01 Date: 2/19/2008 Time: 10:08:19 AM i 'VE State of Ve.1-11.1ont DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES iLw State Street Mfontpelier, VT or,603-0001 m7ww.d.niv.sMt.e.vt.wc4, [Phone] 8o—".828.2000 I fwx 1 802.828.2098 [ttd] 800-253-01-91 Ayency oaf Trarispoj,tatioij PAGE! 0 0 1 03/26/08 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE COPY OF THE 3-YEAR RECORD OF NAME: OUELLETTE,BRIAN,A VERMONT PID: 50654508 ISSUE YEAR: BIRTH DATE: 01-30-65 CURRENT LIC EXP: 2011 LICENSED OPERATOR , NOT SUSPENDED ENDORSEMENTS-M CDL INDICATOR-C, CDL ENDORSEMENT-X, CDL CLASS -A, CDL RESTRICTIONS-B NO ACCIDENTS NO CONVICTIONS/ADJUDICATIONS INO SUSPENSIONS/REVOCATIONS/DISQUALIFICATIONS 1 JRSUANT TO THE DRIVER PRIVACY ACT OF 1994, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 2721 ET SEQ. IEDISCLOSURE OR REDISCLOSURE OF' PERSONAL INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE RECORDS THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES MAY BE A VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AT.MONTPELIER, VT. TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH A.D. , 2008. j 1 1 J 1 ,•'',:d ar baut"ll iytiy delegell to .. ~�1•�37 tF4 Ow. k' bi Piipt (J`ar"4:C14:�. "i� :Y! Neokf .:? that this is a �ybv �3's.:lpp��t,i��?st.rL.rE is"n.wi�i� rM J r N , °" i::,,[4�13t �€1 ��'� �G�'�r dui it t ��"ib-n�3^t� N't in e u "disclosre d rsera'! k maf m t��laft �? : w of the DepaiUtmat o� M wltx V,e4' pnfm •:f: l 1. • 1 . 1........ ._ ____....... ._ ................. l• Page: 1 Document Name: untitled 02/19/2008 10:02 MASSACHUSETTS REGISTRY OF MOTOR VEHICLES UGM0021 MERIT RATING BOARD - SDIP STATEMENT DISPLAY FUNCTION: UMIQ MSG: INQUIRY HAS BEEN PROCESSED ------------------------ INQUIRY FOR INFORMATION ONLY ------------------------ COMPANY DATA: SOURCE MRB POLICY DATA: EFF DATE 02/19/2008 EXP DATE INQ TYPE 9 TRANS DATE 02/19/2008 COV CODE MKT IND TOWN CODE PROCESS DATE 02/19/2008 --------- OPERATOR ---------- ---------- DRIVING HISTORY INFORMATION ---------- LICENSE INCIDENT SURCHARGE NUMBER ST DESCRIPTION DATE DATE VALUE -------------------------- ------------------------------------------- --- S14380561 MA STARTING DATE 02/19/2002 00 SEMERJIAN , 09/21/1960,06,Y, (NO INCIDENTS) 00 EXCELLENT DRIVER+ 99 KEY: 'IF" FOR NXT OPER "C" FOR LIC# LIST "N" FOR NXT INQ F OPERATOR 01 OF 01 Date: 2/19/2008 Time: 10:09:57 AM RI. gov : Rhode Island: Division of Motor Vehicles: Motor Vehicle Records / Licensed ... Page 1 of 1 Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles: Motor Vehicle Records / Licensed Driver Records Search Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles: Online Licensed Driver Record Your transaction was successful. Below is your driver record information. Please print this page. NOTE: This payment will appear on your credit card statement as Rhode Island Interactive. If you have questions regarding the information contained on your driver record, please contact DMV Operator Control at 401-462-0800. This document is a copy of the official state of Rhode Island driver record as provided by the Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles. This record can be certified through the Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles by entering the driver record validation code below at https://www.ri.gov/DMV/mvr/citizen/validate.php. LICENSE RECORD FOR THORNTON, LAWRENCE O As of March 28, 2008 03:24 PM Transaction ID: 21347 Total fee: 19.50 Driver record validation code: f5bb66a3cf3f3ad 03/28/2008 STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS 03:21 DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION COURT DRIVING RECORD ABSTRACT PAGE 1 OF 1 LICENSE STATE RI LICENSE NUMBER ********* **COURT** LAST THORNTON SEX M ** LICENSE INFO ** **** CDL INFO **** FIRST LAWRENCE MI 0 FT EXPIRE 02/20/2011 ISSUE 07/16/2004 STREET ****************************** CLASS B CLASS B STAT VAL C/S/Z *********************** 02906 STATUS VAL ENDRS X REST *********** DOB 02/20/1974 RESTR DISQUALIFIED N ISSUE: 07/16/2004 EXPIRE: 02/20/2011 JAIL FINE ACT DATE SUM/CASE# CMV/HAZ JURIS REASON/OFFENSE/ACC TYPE SEV COURSE N 07/16/2004 USMA N USRI LIC.SURR.FROM OUT-OF-ST S 04/01/2001 0=104198 Y USMA FAIL PAY AAC FINE-SUMMO S 05/20/1997 0=104198 Y USMA FAIL PAY AAC FINE-SUMMO A 07/17/1995 958500029 US25 - NO LOCATION 9 A 02/06/1995 958500028 US25 - NO LOCATION 9 S 12/20/1992 0=104198 Y USMA FAIL PAY AAC FINE-SUMMO Activity codes (ACT) A - Accident C - Cancelled E - Driver education I - Reinstatement N - License surrendered from out-of-state S - Suspension V - Violation X - Disposition date - Conviction or payment date for a violation https://www.ri.gov/DMV/mvr/citizen/receipt.php?session= 3/28/2008 Page: 1 Document Name: untitled 02/19/2008 10:03 MASSACHUSETTS REGISTRY OF MOTOR VEHICLES UGM0021 MERIT RATING BOARD - SDIP STATEMENT DISPLAY FUNCTION: UMIQ MSG: INQUIRY HAS BEEN PROCESSED ------------------------ INQUIRY FOR INFORMATION ONLY ------------------------ COMPANY DATA: SOURCE MRB POLICY DATA: EFF DATE 02/19/2008 EXP DATE INQ TYPE 9 TRANS DATE 02/19/2008 COV CODE MKT IND TOWN CODE PROCESS DATE 02/19/2008 --------- OPERATOR ---------- ---------- DRIVING HISTORY INFORMATION ---------- LICENSE INCIDENT SURCHARGE NUMBER ST DESCRIPTION DATE DATE VALUE -------------------------- ------------------------------------------- --- S23050636 MA STARTING DATE 02/19/2002 00 TABARANI 08/11/1976,06,Y, SPEEDING 09/25/2002 01/23/2003 00 SPEEDING 10/10/2006 11/15/2006 00 OPERATOR SDIP POINTS 00 KEY: "F" FOR NXT OPER "C" FOR LIC## LIST "N" FOR NXT INQ F OPERATOR 01 OF 01 Date: 2/19/2008 Time: 10:10:42 AM RI. gov : Rhode Island: Division of Motor Vehicles : Motor Vehicle Records / Licensed ... Page 1 of 1 Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles: Motor Vehicle Records f Licensed Driver Records Search Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles: Online Licensed Driver Record Your transaction was successful. Below is your driver record information. Please print this page. NOTE: This payment will appear on your credit card statement as Rhode Island Interactive. If you have questions regarding the information contained on your driver record, please contact DMV Operator Control at 401-462-0800. This document is a copy of the official state of Rhode Island driver record as provided by the Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles. This record can be certified through the Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles by entering the driver record validation code below at https.Wwww.ri. ov DMV mvr/citizen/validate.php. LICENSE RECORD FOR MASIELLO, GREGORY A As of January 15, 2008 10:07 AM Transaction ID: 20012 Total fee: 19.50 Driver record validation code: 8eea57223d3d5bf 01/15/2008 STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS 10:04 DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION COURT DRIVING RECORD ABSTRACT PAGE 1 OF 1 LICENSE STATE RI LICENSE NUMBER ********* **COURT** LAST MASIELLO SEX M ** LICENSE INFO ** **** CDL INFO **** FIRST GREGORY MI A FT EXPIRE 12/17/2008 ISSUE 04/28/2003 STREET ****************************** CLASS A CLASS A STAT VAL C/S/Z *********************** 02904 STATUS VAL ENDRS X REST *********** DOB 12/17/1975 RESTR H DISQUALIFIED N ISSUE: 03/27/1992 EXPIRE: 12/17/2008 JAIL FINE ACT DATE SUM/CASE# CMV/HAZ JURIS REASON/OFFENSE/ACC TYPE SEV COURSE Activity codes (ACT) A - Accident C - Cancelled E - Driver education I - Reinstatement N - License surrendered from out-of-state S - Suspension V - Violation X - Disposition date - Conviction or payment date for a violation , 11 W f 11 € n n I j"\-.alV https://www.ri.gov/DMV/mvr/citizen/receipt.php?session= 1/15/2008 Rl.gov : Rhode Island: Division of Motor Vehicles: Motor Vehicle Records / Licensed ... Page 1 of 1 Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles: Motor Vehicle Records / Licensed Driver Records Search Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles: Online Licensed Driver Record Your transaction was successful. Below is your driver record information. Please print this page. NOTE: This payment will appear on your credit card statement as Rhode Island Interactive. If you have questions regarding the information contained on your driver record, please contact DMV Operator Control at 401-462-0800. This document is a copy of the official state of Rhode Island driver record as provided by the Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles. This record can be certified through the Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles by entering the driver record validation code below at https://www.ri.00v/DMV/mvr/citizen/validate.pW. LICENSE RECORD FOR MASIELLO, GREGORY A As of January 15, 2008 10:07 AM Transaction ID: 20012 Total fee: 19.50 Driver record validation code: 8eea57223d3d5bf 01/15/2008 STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS 10:04 DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION COURT DRIVING RECORD ABSTRACT PAGE 1 OF 1 LICENSE STATE RI LICENSE NUMBER ********* **COURT** LAST MASIELLO SEX M ** LICENSE INFO ** **** CDL INFO **** FIRST GREGORY MI A FT EXPIRE 12/17/2008 ISSUE 04/28/2003 STREET ****************************** CLASS A CLASS A STAT VAL C/S/Z *********************** 02904 STATUS VAL ENDRS X REST *********** DOB 12/17/1975 RESTR H DISQUALIFIED N ISSUE: 03/27/1992 EXPIRE: 12/17/2008 JAIL FINE ACT DATE SUM/CASE# CMV/HAZ JURIS REASON/OFFENSE/ACC TYPE SEV COURSE Activity codes (ACT) A — Accident C — Cancelled E — Driver education I — Reinstatement N — License surrendered from out-of-state S — Suspension V — Violation X — Disposition date — Conviction or payment date for a violation V .J W ( IL k 1' Ef V UA-g https://www.ri.gov/DMV/mvr/citizen/receipt.php?session= 1 /15/2008 Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles: Motor Vehicle Records / Licensed Driver Records Search Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles: Online Licensed Driver Record Your transaction was successful. Below is your driver record information. Please print this page. NOTE: This payment will appear on your credit card statement as Rhode Island Interactive. If you have questions regarding the information contained on your driver record, please contact DMV Operator Control at 401-462-0800. This document is a copy of the official state of Rhode Island driver record as provided by the Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles. This record can be certified through the Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles by entering the driver record validation code below at ht p5://www.ri.ciov/DMV/mvr/citizen/validate.php. LICENSE RECORD FOR CICCHETTI, ANTHONY F As of March 25, 2008 12:30 PM Transaction ID: 21265 Total fee: 19.50 Driver record validation code: 0589499c825568b 03/25/2008 STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS 12:27 DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION COURT DRIVING RECORD ABSTRACT PAGE 1 OF 1 LICENSE STATE RI LICENSE NUMBER ********* **COURT** LAST CICCHETTI SEX M ** LICENSE INFO ** **** CDL INFO **** FIRST ANTHONY MI F FT EXPIRE 04/03/2009 ISSUE 12/28/1993 STREET ****************************** CLASS B CLASS B STAT VAL C/S/Z *********************** 02864 STATUS VAL ENDRS X REST *********** DOB 04/03/1965 RESTR DISQUALIFIED N ISSUE: 04/29/1992 EXPIRE: 04/03/2009 JAIL FINE ACT DATE SUM/CASE# CMV/HAZ JURIS REASON/OFFENSE/ACC TYPE SEV COURSE N 04/29/1992 USMA N USRI LIC.SURR.FROM OUT-OF-ST Activity codes (ACT) A - Accident C - Cancelled E - Driver education I - Reinstatement N - License surrendered from out-of-state S - Suspension V - Violation X - Disposition date - Conviction or payment date for a violation V 0 W i it 1. 0 fS Y JIgm 1 J TMC Services, Inc. 1 1 1 1 1 ATTACHMENT 5 INSURANCE CERTIFICATE ACORD. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 3/19/2o 8 DUCER (781)681-6656 x244, Fax(781)681-6686 fhe Driscoll Agency, Inc. g y 93 Longwater Circle O. Box 9120 orwell MA 02061 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURED C Services, Inc. ne William Way Bellingham MA 02019 INSURER A: Steadfast Insurance Co INSURERB:Zurlch American Insurance INSURER C: INSURER D: INSURER E HE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. SR ADD'L INSRD TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY DATEYMM EFFECTIVE /DD/YYDATE POLICY EXPIRATION MM/ D/YY LIMITS FIL IA GENERAL LIABILITY X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS MADE Fx_1 OCCUR GPL3828623 04/21/2007 04/21/2008 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 APREMISESS MAGE( RENTED DAME Ea occurrence $ 100,000 MED EXP (Any oneperson) $ 5,000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 GENT AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PR _3�1 POLICY JECT LOG PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 B AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNEDAUTOS BAP386321104 04/21/2007 04/21/2008 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) $ 1,000,000 X BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) $ ` IANY GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ OTHER THAN EA AC AUTO ONLY: AGG $ $ IX A EXCESS/UMBRELLA LIABILITY OCCUR CLAIMS MADE DEDUCTIBLE RETENTION SE0587292704 (OVER GL, POLL, PROF.) 04/21/2007 04/21/2008 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 10,000,000 AGGREGATE $ 10,000,000 $ $ B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? If yes, describe under SPECIAL PROVISIONS below WC386321604 04/21/2007 04/21/2008 y WCYTATU- OTH- E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,000 E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000 E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT It 1,000,000 A OTHER Contractors Poll. (Occ) & Prof Liab (Claims Made) GPL3828623 INCLUDED WITH GL 04/21/2007 04/21/2008 $ 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS Evidence of Insurance for work performed within the Insureds scope of normal business operations. Notice of Cancellation provision is 30 days except 10 days applies for non-payment of premium. I TE HOLDER State of Maine DEP 17 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333-0017 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE sT s B. Driscoll/KCS� CORD 25 (2001/08) Ono. ,....,... ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 l I 1 TMC Services, Inc. I I I 1 I I I I ATTACHMENT 7C TMC Services, Inc. Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan (SPCC) f TMC Services, Inc. TMC Services, Inc. Transportation Operations Emergency Procedures Guidance This Emergency Procedures Guidance has been prepared in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.120 to provide guidance to TMC Services, Inc. (TMC) in the event of a discharge of hazardous waste during transportation activities. A copy of this guide shall be carried on all of TMC's vehicles transporting hazardous wastes at all times. A. Initial Response Actions In the event of a release of hazardous waste, TMC personnel will perform the following initial response actions: 1. The driver of the vehicle will remain with his or her vehicle unless conditions are unsafe to do so. 2. The driver will keep all unauthorized personnel away from the incident scene and warn persons of the potential hazards associated with the release. All persons in the area will stay clear of all spills, vapors, fumes, and smoke. ALWAYS CONSIDER THE SAFETY OF PERSONS IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA, INCLUDING YOUR OWN. 3. The driver will assess the hazards presented by the spill to reduce immediate risks and to obtain as much information regarding the release as is safely possible. The driver will consider the following: • Is there a spill, leak, or fire? • What material, and what quantity, has been spilled? • What is the terrain like? • What are the weather conditions? • Who/what is at risk: people, property, and/or the environment? • What actions should be taken: Is evacuation necessary? Is diking/containment necessary? • What resources (personnel and equipment) are needed and are readily available? • What can be done immediately and safely? • Is anyone in a life -threatening situation? 4. If any person is in a life -threatening situation, all necessary actions which are safely possible will be conducted to remove them from such a situation. If possible, the person will be removed to an uncontaminated area where appropriate first aid can be administered. 5. The driver will contact TMC's office (if during business hours) or Matthew Clark, President, or Thomas Clark, Vice President and Secretary of TMC (if during non -business hours). After obtaining all pertinent information pertaining to the release including an evaluation of potential risks as ER Guide Page 1 of 5 detailed above, TMC will contact the appropriate parties and agencies including the local fire and police departments, the generator of the hazardous waste, the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RI DEM), the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MA DEP) and, if applicable, the National Response Center (NRC) and Director of the Office of Hazardous Materials Regulations, Materials Transportation Bureau, U.S. Department of Transportation (U. S. DOT). Information to be conveyed to these parties will include, at a minimum, the following: a. Name of the person reporting the incident; b. Name, address, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Identification Number for the transporter; c. Telephone number where the person reporting the incident can be reached; d. Date, time, and location of the incident; e. Mode of transportation and the type of transport vehicle; f. A brief description of the incident and the reason why the material was released; g. For each type of hazardous waste involved in the release: 1. The name and U.S. EPA hazardous waste generator number of the generator(s) of the waste; 2. Shipping name, hazard class, and 4-digit ID number of the waste (as referenced in the "North American Emergency Response Guidebook" (ERG2000); 3. Estimated quantity of the material spilled; and 4. The estimated extent of soil, water, and/or air contamination. h. The shipping name, hazard class, and the 4-digit ID number of any other material carried (not released); i. Local conditions (weather, terrain, proximity to schools, hospitals, residences, etc.); j. Injuries and exposures; and k. Other emergency response services or agencies which have been notified. Notification will be provided for a_y amount of hazardous waste. 6. Emergency Telephone Numbers: a. Local Fire / Police Departments: 911 I b. Maine DEP (daytime): 207-287--2651 Maine DEP (Oil 24-Hour Emergency Number): 800-482-0777 Maine DEP (HazWaste 24-Hour Emergency Number): 800-452-4664 Maine DEP (Oil called in from Out -of -State) I 207-657-3030 Maine DEP (HazWaste called in from Out -of -State) 207-624-7700 Ic. MA DEP (24-Hour Emergency Number in Boston): 617-556-1133 MA DEP (24-Hour Emergency Number elsewhere in MA): 888-304-1133 Jd. National Response Center (NRC): 800-424-8802 or ER Guide Page 2 of 5 202-426-2675 The NRC and the Director of the Office of Hazardous Materials Regulations, Materials Transportation Bureau, U.S. DOT will be contacted when: 1. A person is killed or requires hospitalization due to injuries sustained during a release; 2. Damage to the carrier or property exceeds $50,000; 3. A release involves radioactive materials or etiological agents; or 4. A continuing danger to human health and the environment exists as a result of the release. e. TMC Services, Inc.: f. Matthew Clark, President: g. Thomas Clark, Vice President & Secretary: h. Center for Disease Control: i. Chemtrec: j. Chem -Tel, Inc.: B. Additional Response/Cleanup Activity 800-223-8865 or 508-966-3737 508-966-5348, ext. 11 508-966-5289, ext. 16 800-232-0124 800-424-9300 800-255-3924 Following the completion of the initial response actions as detailed above, the driver of the vehicle will aid responding authorities as appropriate with additional response/cleanup activities. These activities will follow the steps detailed in ERG2000 and may include the following: 1. Evacuation: The necessity for an evacuation of surrounding populations should be considered in the event of a spill of highly dangerous materials (highlighted chemical entries in ERG2000) or a major spill. If an evacuation is necessary, the guidelines provided in the "Table of Initial Isolation and Protective Action Distances" (the green section of ERG2000) will be followed. 2. Containment Activities: If safely possible, containment activities will be performed to prevent the migration of any spilled liquid or solid into the ground or into a storm drain or sanitary sewer. Containment activities shall be performed based on information on spills and leaks presented in the orange section of ERG2000. In most cases, a physical barrier will be erected to attempt to prevent the migration of spilled materials. The barrier will be constructed using absorbent materials which will be carried on the vehicle or, if necessary and available, sand or soil in the I 1 ER Guide Page 3 of 5 vicinity of the spill area. If necessary, holes or trenches can be excavated to prevent further migration; however, the use of absorbent materials is preferred. Containment of solids will be dependant on wind and weather conditions; however, use of plastic (or other material) tarpaulins can be used to cover the spilled material to prevent migration due to high winds. Spills to surface water bodies will be contained using absorbent booms. In concurrence with the containment activity, the source of the spill or leak should be identified and controlled, if safe to do so. The spill or leak may be controlled through the use of plugs stored in the vehicle or simply uprighting overturned containers such as drums. 3. Cleanup: When the source of the spill or leak has been completely contained and controlled, and any immediate hazards associated with the release have been controlled, cleanup can begin. If the spill is contained on an impervious paved surface, the material should be absorbed onto a compatible material (e.g., speedi-dry, sand, etc.). The absorbent material must compatible with the waste so that a violent reaction does not occur. In addition, wash solutions compatible with the spilled material can be used remove residual contamination on an impervious surface or to neutralize corrosive materials. If the released material has reached exposed earth, contaminated soil will be excavated and stored in drums or secured stockpiles for proper disposal. Spills to surface water bodies will be contained and cleaned -up using absorbent booms and pads. A confirmatory sampling program or other method of confirming the effectiveness of the cleanup will be implemented. When applicable, a Rhode Island Licensed Site Professional (LSP) will be contracted to oversee the cleanup to insure that it is completed in accordance with the requirements of the Rhode Island Contingency Plan (RICP). Damaged 55-gallon drums will be placed in oversized "recovery drums" for safe transport and disposal off -site. Similarly, all absorbent materials and contaminated personal protective equipment (PPE) will be transported off -site for proper disposal. 4. First Aid: Consult the orange section of ERG2000 for guidance on performing first aid on any persons requiring such attention. C. Emergency Equipment Each TMC vehicle which will carry hazardous wastes will be outfitted with the following emergency equipment which will be in good, working condition: • CB radio or mobile phone • Fire extinguisher • Non-combustible absorbent material (speedi-dry) • Absorbent pads • Absorbent booms • Other absorbent materials including absorbent pillows • Plastic sheeting ER Guide Page 4 of 5 I• Five -gallon bucket • Overpack drum, if carrying drummed waste • Plugs of various sizes for drum/container repair/leak stoppage • Other spill containment equipment appropriate for the types of wastes being transported • Non -sparking drum wrench • Spare drum bung closures • Shovel • Street broom • Sampling equipment including sample jars • Orange traffic cones or reflective triangle warning set I • Flashlight • First aid kit with an eye wash • PPE including hard hat, chemical resistant gloves and boot covers (latex or nitrile), chemical resistant suit (tyvek or equivalent), full -face respirator with organic vapor/particulate dust cartridges, eye protection, hearing protection, and other PPE appropriate for the types of wastes being transported. • Latest edition of the "Emergency Response Guidebook" (ERG2000) • Latest edition of the "Hazardous Materials Compliance Pocket Book" by J.J. Keller & Associates, Inc. 1 ER Guide Page 5 of 5 ,-5AN "FJE-rno .DRNE' `�';%o:�r �:�i��,r��RL:•I�aoyAc`Rirss-r��liL� I :�u-t'H ��f-4wslw REA�,y Co, I AlA' �C7/ { I t_� New v4C Ar (04AV5tAtIQVMEEj t CD op I 10I 5 TON �iQ!(!� gpIfill 1IWw RV� 3LAYER SHREDDED BARK MULCH (TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE q qL R/ m ARCHITECT) OVER PERMEABLE WEED FABRIC. DO NOT PLACE CLOSE i0 p Y/• MAIN STEM. 3' SAUCER RIM BACKFILL WITHEXCAVATED MATERIAL. IF SOIL 6 PREDOMINATELY CUY OR GRAVEL INCORPORATE ORGANIC MATERIAL AS DIRECTED AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PLANT PIT WIDTH 3X NOTES: BALL DIA. 'PLANT SHRUB AT SAME DEPTH AT WHICH SHRUB HAD PREVIOUSLY GROWN 'LOOSEN, CUT, 6 REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL 'SHREDDED BARK MULCH AND WEED BARRIER FABRIC TO BE CONTINUOUS W HEN USED IN BEDS. BALL AND BURLAP SHRUB PLANT LIST LABEL ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY "1 f r�Y TI=T�JSPCRi�llp„CU/�'. TON 60-346 ARBORVITAE NIGARA 5 THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'NIGRA' 3 Ff CG D y 14 CoveaAs'e- Lauri-Il _- �7 IF44tiz yAlLb G-Mss NOTE: THIS PLAN IS INTENDED TO SHOW LANDSCAPE SCREENING FOR THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED HVAC UNITS. THIS PLAN IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A BOUNDARY SURVEY OR SITE PLAN. PLAN INFORMATION IS BASED ON DETAIL PROVIDED BY CLIENT. FttN 20 0 20 40 60 80 SCALE: I- 20' AT 24x36 1 "=40' AT 11 x17 "Aw -tce TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Me& AIR PARK ROAD 1 WILLISTON. VFRMONT 5 toew 5A I W—c—cOM Revisions No. Description Date By Use of These CmNA,gs 1. unless Bin, w,, noted, these Drawings are intended for preliminary planning, Coordination with other disciplines or utilities, and/or approval tram the regulatory aPho,itles. They are not intended as construction drawings unless noted as such arm. al approved by a regulatory authority. 2. By use of these drawings for canstruction of the Project, the Owner represents that they have reNewed, approved, and accepted the drawings, obtained all necessary permits, and have met Wlth all applicable pcdies/disciplines, Including but not limited to, the Engineer and the Archl to Insure these plans are properly coo chafed inducing, but not hotted to, contract document, ilbecir—fans. ovmen/controclor agreements, building and mechanical plus, prtNde and publk utill and other pertinent permits for construction. 3. Owner and Archilect, are responsbte for find design and location of buildings shown, Including an area measured a minimum five (5) feet around any building and coorc log final ut4ity connections shown on these plane. 4. Eric, to acing these plans for construction layout, the user shall contact TCE to ensure the plan contains the most current revisiom, 5. These Drawings era specific to the Project and are not transferable. As instruments of serAce, these drawings, and copies thereof, furnished by TCE are Its excusn-e property. Changeth s to e drawings may only be made by TICE. If w omissions are discovered, they shall be brought to the anemias of TCE Immedlasely. 6. I B the Ul responsibility to ensure this copy contains he most -sent reNtlons. B unsure, please contact TCE. k , , �1T" Tlle South Burlington Realty Company 40 San Remo Drive South Burlington, Vermont Shear=me Landscape Plan Date: 02/26/2ole scale: 1 z 20' Project Number: 16027 Drawn By: Project Engineer: Approved By: Field Book: Ll -01 March 18, 2016 Re: #SP-16-05 & #DR-16-01 — 40 San Remo Drive Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincere y ym nd *�a6i Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7015 0640 0007 8199 3532 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com south � ttrlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP-k- 0 (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ❑Administrative development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax ft South Burlinqton Realtv Company, PO Box 2204, S. Burlington, VT 05407-2204 863-9039 x 3 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 115: 76-78 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): Tim Mckenzie same 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Tim Mckenzie same 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: tim@southburlingtonrealty.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 40 San Remo Drive 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 1490-00040 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): a,Replace overhead door on south side of building with glassc w,-l§"^ and change of use from office to indoor recreation. A -• - - _J- ve✓' ,{ar. 2• To itch b # xisting Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Office use 3200 sf c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Indoor recreation (yoga studio) 3200 sf d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 3200 sf e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): 1 story 17' at peak f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): 0 g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 1 instructor no office employees h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Desiqn review district 2 2 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 18,500 Existing 17.30 % / Proposed 17.30 % / Sq. Ft. 3200 sq. ft. 3200 sq. ft. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 61 % / 11,285 Proposed 61 % / 11,285 c. Front yard (along each street) Existing Proposed sq. ft. sq. ft. 30 % / sq. ft. 30 % / sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 0 * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC $ 57,000 $0 a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out):11.29 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION:4pm - 6pm weekdays; 9am-10am weekends 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday - Friday 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: March 15, 2015 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the t'me of submi ig the site plan application' accordance with the city's fee schedule. ` G / �✓►- it , �� 4� Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one �- �j�} yy 3/ digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 0 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNA OF APPLfCAXT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: V r �/& REVIEW AUTHORITY: (Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to bc: Complete Incomplete 9 1 (M//�7 Administrat ve Officer Date The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 4 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 ray From: Tim McKenzie <tim@southburlingtonrealty.com> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 9:58 AM To: ray Subject: Re: 40 San Remo Drive Options Ray, Would you please change the proposed use from indoor recreation to personal instruction, I believe that is a more appropriate category. Thanks Tim Sent from my Whone On Feb 22, 2016, at 9:29 AM, ray <ray(a,sburl.com> wrote: Good morning, Tim: As you know, DC Francis of the SBFD stated the following: Anticipated high occupancy number is 82 patrons/staff. Pending, of course the actual physical lay out. Based upon this anticipated number of 82, the required parking is calculated as follows: 82 x 0.33 -= 27 spaces. The Board could waive up to 25% of this requirement if justified which means they could authorize 22 spaces as still sufficient. Given that there are only 14 spaces on the property, your options going forward are: 1) We notice that your application classified the use as Indoor Recreation. After further analysis, it appears the use is more similar to that at Spotlight on Dance which was classified as Personal Instruction School (see Findings of Fact & Decision, #SP-09-59 approved on July 21, 2009). Parking requirements are 2 spaces per employee, which in this case would be seven (7) spaces, so no parking issue. If you do not choose the above option, other options are as follows: 1) Continue discussions with SBFD and your prospective tenant to fine tune the actual physical layout at which point the SBFD would come up with a more accurate high occupancy number. However, SBFD cannot issue a final determination on occupancy until the actual fit -up is built. 2) Amend your application by exploring a shared parking arrangement with an adjacent landowner. 3) The City's new Form Based Code regulations are anticipated to go into effect 21 days after an anticipated adoption date of March 21. Under these new regulations, your proposal would not be subject to Site Plan review but would be subject to a zoning permit. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ).. rn I hereby certify that on this 167 day of Febr 2016 , a copy of the foregoing public notice for Site Plan Review [type of application] #S P-1 6-05 (application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) Timberlake Associate 36 San Remo Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Realty 50 San Remo Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Champlain Oil Company 45 San Remo Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Besaw LLC 55 San Remo Drive, South Burlington , VT 05403 Michael & Gayle Quimby 64 Barrett Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 Alex McHenry 66 Barrett Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 Richer Residential Trust 68 Barrett Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 Dated at Williston [town/city], Vermont, this Printed Name: Phone number and entail: Signature: Date: Remit to: City of South I Department of M 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Timothy McKenzie 711 day ofFebruary _,2016 rlinqtonrealty.com & Zoning A03 South Burlington Sample Cer4ficaie of Service Form. Rev- 1-2012 ray From: Terry Francis Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 12:04 PM To: ray Subject: 40 san remo dr Hi Ray Anticipated high occupancy number is 82 patrons/staff. Pending, of course the actual physical lay out. DC Terence Francis, CFI Fire Marshal South Burlington Fire Department 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4134 Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. No Text > > 1 --7�EJY)O ; r ' Igi . ,',�-pRO"�E1+t0 fly-- 1�.;�"'� � LOX 4 ! - N r r�R i �tR 4-0 f i C,D li zaN� K � z-t>A)a mm"mmml iao+ .10 ZR�k Snow $�a✓�. � flea ZaniE — Li SITE KA N ( XI STING) 40 SAN RE"O DRIVE South burlingbn Real pany I EC ` JAN i 3 20% City of So. Burlington No Text CONFIGURATIONS ,hear Block • Screw Spline This economical flush glaze system is available in both shear block and screw spline fabrication methods. Series 403 Storefront can accommodate all standard 1 3/4" Entrances as well as WV410 vents. This series is thermally broken, enhancing energy savings potential. Vertical mullions will accept steel reinforcement to enhance structural performance. Features Thermally broken frames Screw spline construction Shear block construction The optional Roto-Vent"m ventilator 2-way corner mullions (90' & 1350) 3-way corner mullions (T-mullions) 00-150 and 150-300 variable mullions Accommodates up to 1 1/16" glazing Uniform glazing gasket is used for exterior and interior Various height intermediate horizontals and sills Accessory line of perimeter anchors, pocket fillers, door adaptors, etc. Anodized or painted finishes available r" ,rjnht ?nth Fr(-n r ., r ,lion ni 1' Benefits Enhanced thermal performance Allows assembly of sections prior to installation Decreases installation time Ability to erect on the job site Allows fresh air into the room, yet maintains security Design flexibility Multifaceted elevations Custom applications Expands design and energy savings options Allows optimized use of gasket Simplifies ordering and installation Ability to maintain desired sight line Increased product versatility Multiple options to answer economic and aesthetic concerns , /b11a C'—P—y 1OnO C7(7)HNTY Pr') • NAnNFTT MO h57n8 • 800.791 4169 • F?fCnc nrn colt` SHEAR BLOCK SCREW SPLINE IP 0 7` e, PERFORMANCE DATA SYSTEM 403 STOREFRONT SCREW SPLINE FRAMING SYSTEM 403 STOREFRONT SHEAR BLOCK FRAMING AIR INFILTRATION <.06 CFM/SF ® 6.24 PSF AIR INFILTRATION <.06 CFM/SF ® 6.24 PSF _ A = Estimated values and/or designations WATER NO LEAKAGE ® 12.0 PSF WATER _. NO LEAKAGE @ 12.0 PSF B = Non-standard sae or configuration STRUCTURAL visit MyEFCO at www.efcocorp.com STRUCTURAL visit MyEFCO at www.efcocorp.com C = Dual glazed CRF-FRAME(1503-98) __.._ _....... ___.___.57E CRFFRAME (1503-98)._. _....... _.._. _.....57",r D=1" Insulated -1/4"clear )/2"air, )/4"clear CRF-GLASS(1503-98) ___ _._ _._.._...70E CRF-GLASS(1503-98)..... _.._... _ _..70",` E=1" Insulated -1/4"clear (Low Emissivity).1/2"air, 1/4"clear F = 1" Insulated - 1/4" clear (LowEmissivity), 1/2" argon.1 /4" clear G = 1 " Insulated - 1/4" clear, 1 /2" air. 1 /4" clear (Low Emissivity) 403 THERMAL U-FACTORS* CENTER OF GLASS U-FACTOR CONFIGURATION AND SIZE FIXED" 78 3/4" X 78 3/4" FIXED 120" X 120" 0.46 0.55 0.52 0.34 0.46 0.41 0.30 0.42 0.38 0.24 0.38 0.33 0.20 1 0.34 1 0,29 • Based on NFRC 100 ••NFRC Gateway size GLAZING SYSTEM 403 CAN BE INSIDE OR OUTSIDE GLAZED WITH EXTRUDED ALUMINUM, SNAP -IN GLAZING BEAD. GLASS IS "DRY GLAZED" WITH TOP LOAD GASKET. GLAZINGS OF 3/16" TO 1-1 /16" INFILL PANELS ARE ACCOMMODATED. SEE GLAZING CHART BELOW FOR EXACT SIZE. SYSTEM 403 GLAZING CHART POLYCARBONATE I GLASS OR PANEL 3/16" 1 114" 5/16" 1 3/16" 1/4" 1/4"" 5/16" 7116" 1/2" 9/16" 5/8" 3/4" 7/8" 15/16" 1" 1-1/16" MONOLITHIC GLASS C C C C C C C INSULATED GLASS I I I C C A C '-Obscure glass thickness ••-Laminated glass thickness A -Available glaring option C -Adaptor and/or gasket required Blank - N/A a Pr!!a G'ompa"r ©Copyright 2010 EFCO Corporation 01/10 1000 COUNTY RD • MONETT, MO 65708 • 800.221.4169 • efcocorp.Com Frame Construction The frames have a depth of 4 1/2", and the nominal material wall thickness is .080". Members are extruded 6063-T6 aluminum alloy. Corner construction employs screw spline or shear block method. See Illustration 1 & 2. Door Frames System 403 offers integral System 402 entrance frames as a part of the entrance framing system. Members are nominally .080" in thickness. Weather Stripping All entrance frames are weather-stripped with bulb gasket. Thermal Barrier All frames and vents are thermally broken using the latest technology in two part, high density polyurethane. Glazing Series 403 can be inside or outside glazed with extruded aluminum, snap -in glazing bead. Glass is "dry glazed" with top load gasket. Glazings of 3/16" to 1 1/16" infill panels are accommodated. See Glazing Chart for exact size. Illustration I &ON Illustration ©Copyright 2010 EFCO Corporation 01/10 1000 COUNTY RD • MONETT, MO 65708 • 800.221.4169 • efcocorp.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Design Review Committee FROM: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner DATE: February 21, 2006 Cc: John Jaeger DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Design Review Application DR-05-11 40 San Remo Drive South Burlington Realty, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking to amend a previously issued Master signage Permit for Randall Munson; 40 San Remo Drive. The existing MSP allowed one wall sign, and the applicant is now asking to amend that approval to allow one free-standing sign and two window graphics The applicant appeared before the DRC on December 19, 2005 and was asked to return to show landscaping or planters at the base of the sign. That information is now included. In addition, design plans for properties within Design District 2 shall comply with the following site design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.02 of the Land Development Regulations Landscape and plantings. Significant trees and vegetation should be preserved in its natural state insofar as practicable. Any grade changes should be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas. Landscape plantings and amenities shall be well designed with appropriate variations and shall be included as an integral enhancement of the site and, where needed, for screening purposes. The plans now show landscaping at the base of the new sign. The Design Review Committee should discuss this and determine consistency with the design guidelines for the City Center District. Additional standards were discussed at the December 10 2005 meeting. Those notes are attached. South Burlington City Center Design Review Committee Meeting Monday, December 19th, 2005 6:30 PM Item #3 is #DR-05-11, an amendment to a previously issued Master Signage Permit (DS-02-20) for Randall Munson, 40 San Remo Drive. The existing MSP allowed one wall sign, and the applicant is now asking to amend that approval to allow one free-standing sign and two window graphics, illustrated in the attached application. The applicant has submitted the following pursuant to Section 8(c) of the Sign Ordinance: (a) Plot plan showing sign location and landscaping (b) Proposed sign dimensions (c) Design parameters including fonts, colors and materials (d) Lighting — the applicant states that there are "no plans to provide illumination" for any signage. Evaluation: (a) Size: the proposed wall sign is 21 square feet in size and 7' tall, which is well within the square footage and height limits for the district (32 SF and 12', respectively). Pursuant to Section 18(h) of the Sign Ordinance, window signs may not exceed 25% of the area of the window area to which a sign is attached. There is a note on the application to this effect. (b) Setback: As this property fronts on San Remo Drive, the sign must be set back five feet from the right of way. This standard is met. (c) Landscaping. The plans do not show landscaping of the sign base. Landscaping or planters should be provided when the sign is installed. Staff recommends the DRC condition this approval on submittal of a revised site plan showing landscaping or planters at the base of the sign, with the Administrative Officer to approve prior to issuance of a sign permit. The other landscaping on the property was reviewed and approved by the DRB and exceeds the City's minimum standards. (d) Lighting. The applicant has stated that no illumination is proposed. The applicant needs to be aware that the DRC will need to amend the MSP if illumination is desired in the future. (e) City Center standards. Section 6 of the Sign Ordinance has four criteria for signs in this district: consistent design; promote city center goals; color and texture; and materials used. i. Consistent design. The graphics on the proposed freestanding and window signs are consistent, cleanly designed, and easy to read. They are consistent with the primary structure on site as well. South Burlington City Center Design Review Committee Meeting Monday, December 19th, 2005 6:.qo PM I Promote city center goals of pedestrian orientation and high quality. As with the Beacon Townhouse sign, this sign is lower and smaller than the allowable limits. This scale promotes a pedestrian orientation. The graphics are well designed and readable. iii. Color and texture. The materials and color scheme are acceptable and compatible with the site. iv. Materials used. Aluminum and vinyl are suitable in this industrial transition area of the City Center. (f) Other issues. Staff recommends the DRC approve the proposed signs and MSP, with the condition that any subsequent signs other than the freestanding and window signs approved herein require DRC review prior to approval, and that the materials, fonts, colors, and treatments used on the free-standing sign be utilized for any and all other signs on the property. Specifically: o White background o Orange, navy and medium blue logos with black or blue lettering o Consistent fonts o Cedar posts With these conditions, and a stipulation that a revised site plan showing landscaping or planters at the base be submitted to the Administrative Officer, staff recommends approval of this master signage permit and individual sign application. Agenda Item #4 — Discussion of City Center and Commercial District Design Project I would like to have a quick discussion with the DRC on the upcoming City Center and Commercial District design project that is intended to revamp the design review process, potentially expand its scope, and develop a public art and design plan for the City Center. f jjj 7jj r NS 3073 WILLISTON ROAD • SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT05403 Phone: 802-863-6233 • Fax 802-863-6324 bob®signaramavt.com TMC Services, Inc. 40 San Remo Drive Face view showing typical planter and plantings v cc = TMC Services, Inc. 40 San Remo Drive Y x 7' two-sided Free-standing Sign Aluminum composite with vinyl decoration Mounted on 4'x4' painted cedar posts - 7' to top of post Predominate colors: Blue, Orange, & Black on White Planter and plantings to be done by others. _84 in (0 co 6" main copy 2-1/2" sub copy �u Provisions of Master Signage Plan: 1) Color scheme: Proposed signs to be white background with blue, orange, and black decorations 2) Lettering or Graphic style: Simple serifs and block lettering only. Simple logo forms. 3) Lighting: Non requested at this location. 4) Location of signs on buildings None requested at present. Up to 32 sq ft allowed in future. 5) Materials: Aluminum composite sign board, premium vinyl decoration, painted cedar posts, painted steel brackets 6) Sign proportions: Proposed sign is 3 ft high by 7 ft wide. To be mounted to maximum height of 7 ft. Height and size well within allowable limits. Not out of scale with buildings or surroundings. Overall size allowance: 32 sf — proposed sign is 21 sf (<66% of max.). Overall height allowance: 12 ft — proposed sign is 7 ft (<58% of max.) Height x Length proportions: Approved signs in this development have proportions up to 4X Length/Height. Proposed sign 2.33X Length/Height (<60% of other approved sign proportions). Other provisions directed by property owners: None Consent of landowner: Granted 3073 WILLISTON ROAD • SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 Phone: 802-863-6233 • Fax 802-863-6324 bob@signaramavt.com TMC Services, Inc. 40 San Remo Drive Aerial view showing typical planter and plantings Low cedar planter around base. Containing Junipers, bulbs and annuals. 00 Bulbs Planter and plantings to be done by others. o Anneals Planter box shown as 2-112' x 10' for illustration only E— Painted Cedar Posts and sign While all freestanding signs in South Burlington shall be surrounded by permanent landscaping, no standards are included in the current sign ordinance to define acceptable landscaping plans. The Master Signage Plan contains no explicit requirement for design review approval of landscaping. Corporation Information Corporation Name TMC SERVICES, INC. Corporation Status Active File No F-25829-0 Type Foreign Incorporation Date 03/01/2004 Corporation Description ENV & UTILITY CONSTRUCTION State of Incorporation MA Fiscal Month End 12 Registered Agent MATTHEW C CLARK Address 20 SAN REMO DRIVE City State Zip SO BURLINGTON VT 05403 President MATTHEW C CLARK Vice Pres THOMAS S CLARK JR Secretary THOMAS S CLARK JR Treasurer MATTHEW C CLARK Principal Street Address ONE WILLIAM WAY City State Zip BELLINGHAM MA 02019 Last Annual Report 12/31 /2004 Above accurate as of. 02/02/2006 I.n& rmation Contact Name. I Site Search I Help Ve .Mont State Page I Contact I Discialrner. This Web Page is http://cgi2.sec.state.vt.us/cgi-shl/nhayer.exe 2/3/2006 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 21, 2005 Bob Diaco Sign — A- Rama 3073 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: DR-05-11 Dear Mr. Diaco: Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision regarding the above mentioned application approved by the Development Review Board on December 20, 2005. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, (!'� L BetsytMono gh Planning & Zoning Assistant o'l��o OC(� �3cpl � 1 gto ice51 1 h us+ 12C, WsubmmU_ +! d ,MsP�l�u�tan.SIGN*A*RANA 3073 Williston Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-863-6233 • Fax 802-863-6324 BobGsignaramavt.com Application for Design Review - City of South Burlington Approval is being sought for: Sign Design Approval Property Owner of Record: South Burlington Realty Co., 29 Cotton Place, Williston, 863-9039 Applicant & Contact: Bob Diaco, Sign *A *Rama, 3073 Williston Rd., South Burlington, 863-6233 / 863-6324 fax Project Street Address: TMC Services, Inc., 20 San Remo Drive, South Burlington Tax Parcel ID: Project Description: Sign design approval is being sought for a 21 sq ft double -sided freestanding sign. The occupant, a sole business at this location, is entitled to erect up to a 32 sq ft freestanding sign. The proposed sign will be constructed of an aluminum composite material with a baked enamel white finish. The sign will be decorated with vinyl graphics featuring three predominant colors, (1) blue, (2) orange and (3) black. The proposed sign will be mounted on painted cedar posts to a maximum height of 7' from grade. There are no plans to provide illumination for this sign. Two window graphics, each occupying less than 25% of the area of the window to which they will be affixed, are to be installed on the premises. There are no restrictions on the number and placement of window graphics provided they occupy less than 25% of the area of the window. Layouts attached. Relationship to existing signs: The new sign will complement existing signs in the area in that it is of similar quality and materials. —C__ Signature of Applicant Date of Submission: 3073 WILLISTON ROAD • SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 Phone: 802-863-6233 • Fax 802-863-6324 bob@signaramavt.com �Mr TMC Services, Inc. 40 San Remo Drive Y x 7' two-sided Free-standng Sign Aluminum composite with vinyl decoration Mounted on 4'x4' painted cedar posts - 7' to top of sign Predominate colors: Blue, Orange, & Black on White This is the only business located on this property. Permissable to have up to 32 sq ft. freestanding sign. Proposed sign is 21 sq. ft. 3073 WILLISTON ROAD • SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 Phone: 802-863-6233 • Fax 802-863-6324 bob@signaramavt.com Window Graphics Less than 25% of window area TMC Services, Inc. Please Use Other Door (802) 863-5300 .: _ � i= : fir " " •:2.Yr .�AL:'R.o;�:R�� /''I/�Pc.� Y 'ifol i. ,.•�c Njj� 11�V1 l� .60 .Owvt oC"f-"� �� A ILC A = 1 SI Soo s,F. V �, FRoNT yam= Z)T)%- fn' SITE PLAN (EXISTING) - 40 SAN REDO pRIVE -- South Ui'mgtun Rea(tyCcmpQny 5buth'8urfingtbn, Vemonf^ 1- i q 2)A05 16: 56 022S6' T5 DEC-20-2005 04:33 Erom:RGD31i,,31 TMC SERVICESI IeO2863G324 To._10005 PAi;E 01 / 01 P,1/1 3073 Wilpston Road, go, Burlington, VT 05403 402-063-6233 * Fax $02-863-6324 BobO%ignaramavt,com City of Sough Burlington Design Rcview December 19, 2005 Re; Planting schedule for TALC Services, Inc,, 20 San Remo Drive In the spring of 2006 TMC Services, Inc, will construct a planter at the base of the sign. The planter will be made of cedar timbers and will be planted and maintained with five 1-gallon creeping; junipers, 10 spring bulbs, and a flat of annuaLs. TMC Se es, Inc. December 19, 2005 South Burlington City Center Design Review Committee Meeting Monday, December 191h, 2005 6:30 PM Hall SECOND FLOOR Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street AGENDA: 1. Application #DR-05-09 Dorset Holdings, Inc. (Charles Deslauriers), 345 Dorset Street Single sign permit, Beacon Row town houses 2. Application #DR-05-10 Montpelier Broadcasting, Inc./Pizzagalli Construction, 72 San Remo Drive Installation of communications tower 3. Application #DR-05-11 South Burlington Realty Company, San Remo Drive Amendment of Master Signage Permit and single sign 4. Discussion of City Center and Commercial District design project Respectfully submitted, Juli Beth Hinds, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning South Burlington City Center Design Review Committee Meeting Monday, December 19th, 2005 6:30 PM To: South Burlington Design Review Committee From: Juli Beth Hinds, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning RE: Meeting Monday, December 19th, 2005 Date: December 16, 2005 Agenda: 1. Application #DR-05-09 Dorset Holdings, Inc. (Charles Deslauriers), 345 Dorset Street Master Signage Permit and single free-standing sign, Beacon Row town houses 2. Application #DR-05-10 Montpelier Broadcasting, Inc./Pizzagalli Construction, 72 San Remo Drive Installation of communications tower 3. Application #DR-05-11 South Burlington Realty Company, 40 San Remo Drive Amendment of Master Signage Permit and sign design approval 4. Discussion of City Center and Commercial District design project Agenda Item #1 — Application #DR-os-oq — MSP and Sign Design ApProual Application DR-05-09 is for installation of a single free-standing sign at the Beacon Row town house complex, 345 Dorset Street. This is a 24-unit complex in the CD-3 zoning district that was last reviewed and approved in 1999• This application is for Master Signage Permit approval for a single free-standing sign on Dorset Street. The applicant has submitted the following pursuant to Section 8(c) of the Sign Ordinance: (a) Plot plan showing sign location and landscaping (b) Proposed sign dimensions (c) Design parameters including fonts, colors and materials (d) Lighting options and lighting cut sheets for other parts of the property (previously submitted) Evaluation: (a) Size: the proposed sign is 14.66 square feet in size and 69" tall (5' 9"), which is well within the square footage and height limits for the district (32 SF and 12', respectively). (b) Setback: Section 9(h) of the Sign Ordinance requires signs within the City Center district to be located within a "sign corridor" that runs 16' west from the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 15, 2005 Bob Diaco Sign -A -Rama 3073 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: DR-05-11 Dear Mr. Diaco: Enclosed is a copy of the agenda for the December 20, 2005 Development Review Board meeting. Please make sure someone attends the meeting. If you have any questions, please let me know. Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant South Burlington City Center Design Review Committee Meeting Monday, December 19th, 2005 6:�o PM edge of the Dorset Street right of way. The farthest extent of the proposed sign would be exactly 16' west of the edge of the right of way, so this standard is met. (c) Landscaping. The plan attached with the application shows a landscaped area near the sign base. This landscaping plan was approved by the DRB. Staff believes this is sufficient and appropriate landscaping. (d) Lighting. The applicant has previously gained approval for light fixtures elsewhere on the property. Two options for lighting the proposed sign have been submitted. One is to have a ground -mounted fixture on either side of the sign. The other is a gooseneck -mounted landscape light that would have one fixture illuminating either side of the sign. Section 21(h) of the Sign Ordinance states "...fixtures shall not include bare bulbs, and fixtures shall not make bare bulbs or other direct light sources visible to persons viewing a sign." Staff feels that either lighting option is acceptable, but care needs to be taken to ensure that the direct light source or bulbs in a gooseneck feature are sufficiently shielded so as not to have bulbs directly visible to pedestrians or those driving. (e) City Center standards. Section 6 of the Sign Ordinance has four criteria for signs in this district: consistent design; promote city center goals; color and texture; and materials used. i. Consistent design. This sign design uses specific treatments that reference the Beacon Hill townhouse buildings, such as using the same paint colors as the trim and siding on the townhouses. I Promote city center goals of pedestrian orientation and high quality. The use of copper and wood accents and quality lighting design, and the scale of this sign (smaller and lower than allowed) both promote a high -quality, pedestrian oriented look for the property. iii. Color and texture. The red and copper accents are compatible with the brick, tan and white colors of the townhouses and form a harmonious overall scheme. iv. Materials used. Again, copper and wood are good choices of materials for the City Center and promote a quality appearance. (f) Other issues. The applicant has not stated whether other signs are desired. Staff recommends the DRC stipulate that any subsequent signs require DRC review prior to approval, and that the materials, fonts, colors, and treatments used on the free-standing sign be utilized for any and all other signs on the property. Specifically: o White or tan backgrounds o Copper, tan, or red accents and trim o Bodoni Block or Trajan Pro Boild fonts South Burlington City Center Design Review Committee Meeting Monday, December igth, 2005 6:�o PM o Brackets and structural supports either powder coated or painted to match the background colors. With these conditions, staff recommends approval of this master signage permit and individual sign application. Application #2 — DR-o�s-10 — Design Plan approval The second application is from Montpelier Broadcasting, Inc. and Pizzagalli Construction for installation of two communications antennas on the roof of the existing Pizzagalli Construction building at 72 San Remo Drive. The applicants have submitted a site plan of the Pizzagalli building, photos of the existing structure (including the 20' tall single antenna existing on the building), and photo simulations of how the property will appear from two points on San Remo Drive after installation of the proposed communications antennas. Communications antennas are a protected use under zoning, meaning that mitigating conditions may not interfere with the installation, operation and use of these devices. The criterion for review of these structures within the City Center zoning district is Section 11.oi(F)(i)(h) of the Land Development Regulations, which states: (h) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. Such features, in excess of one foot in height, shall be either enclosed by outer building walls or parapets, or grouped and screened in a suitable manner, or designed in themselves so that they are balanced and integrated with respect to the design and materials of the building. Staff believes that this application meets the standards in (h) above for several reasons. First, Montpelier Broadcasting has come to an arrangement that puts these communications antennas on an existing building that already has such a structure, and that is farther away from the right-of-way on Dorset Street and San Remo Drive than their building at the corner of Dorset and San Remo. This is visual mitigation in and of itself. Second, the antennas are located in such a manner that they are both grouped with another antenna on an existing roofline, which reduces the amount of change to the existing visual profile, and which makes them largely invisible from Dorset Street since the existing antenna blocks a direct view. Staff thus recommends approval of this design plan. Agenda Item # 3 — DR-os-11 — MSPAmendment and sign approval South Burlington City Center Design Review Committee Meeting Monday, December 19tn, 2005 6:30 PM Item #3 is #DR-o5-11, an amendment to a previously issued Master Signage Permit (DS-02-20) for Randall Munson, 40 San Remo Drive. The existing MSP allowed one wall sign, and the applicant is now asking to amend that approval to allow one free-standing sign and two window graphics, illustrated in the attached application. The applicant has submitted the following pursuant to Section 8(c) of the Sign Ordinance: (a) Plot plan showing sign location and landscaping (b) Proposed sign dimensions (c) Design parameters including fonts, colors and materials (d) Lighting — the applicant states that there are "no plans to provide illumination" for any signage. Evaluation: (a) Size: the proposed wall sign is 21 square feet in size and 7' tall, which is well within the square footage and height limits for the district (32 SF and 12', respectively). Pursuant to Section 18(h) of the Sign Ordinance, window signs may not exceed 25% of the area of the window area to which a sign is attached. There is a note on the application to this effect. (b) Setback: As this property fronts on San Remo Drive, the sign must be set back five feet from the right of way. This standard is met. (c) Landscaping. The plans do not show landscaping of the sign base. Landscaping or planters should be provided when the sign is installed. Staff recommends the DRC condition this approval on submittal of a revised site plan showing landscaping or planters at the base of the sign, with the Administrative Officer to approve prior to issuance of a sign permit. The other landscaping on the property was reviewed and approved by the DRB and exceeds the City's minimum standards. (d) Lighting. The applicant has stated that no illumination is proposed. The applicant needs to be aware that the DRC will need to amend the MSP if illumination is desired in the future. (e) City Center standards. Section 6 of the Sign Ordinance has four criteria for signs in this district: consistent design; promote city center goals; color and texture; and materials used. i. Consistent design. The graphics on the proposed freestanding and window signs are consistent, cleanly designed, and easy to read. They are consistent with the primary structure on site as well. South Burlington City Center Design Review Committee Meeting Monday, December 19th, 2005 6:.o PM ii. Promote city center goals of pedestrian orientation and high quality. As with the Beacon Townhouse sign, this sign is lower and smaller than the allowable limits. This scale promotes a pedestrian orientation. The graphics are well designed and readable. iii. Color and texture. The materials and color scheme are acceptable and compatible with the site. iv. Materials used. Aluminum and vinyl are suitable in this industrial transition area of the City Center. (f) Other issues. Staff recommends the DRC approve the proposed signs and MSP, with the condition that any subsequent signs other than the freestanding and window signs approved herein require DRC review prior to approval, and that the materials, fonts, colors, and treatments used on the free-standing sign be utilized for any and all other signs on the property. Specifically: o White background o Orange, navy and medium blue logos with black or blue lettering o Consistent fonts o Cedar posts With these conditions, and a stipulation that a revised site plan showing landscaping or planters at the base be submitted to the Administrative Officer, staff recommends approval of this master signage permit and individual sign application. Agenda Item #4 — Discussion of City Center and Commercial District Design Project I would like to have a quick discussion with the DRC on the upcoming City Center and Commercial District design project that is intended to revamp the design review process, potentially expand its scope, and develop a public art and design plan for the City Center. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPAKTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Design Review Committee FROM. Brian Robertson, Associate Planner 13 a, DATE: November 4, 2004 Cc: John Jaeger DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Design Review Application DR-04-08 40 San Remo Drive South Burlington Realty, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval for the following exterior modifications: 1) fill-in overhead door areas on south and east sides to match existing metal siding, and 2) resurface roof with membrane roof system. The subject property falls within Design District 2 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D)(1)(b) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the addition or alteration of an exterior wall of a building or structure shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). Design plans for properties within Design District 1 shall comply with the following design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.01(F) of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. The design of a building should consider the design features of other structures in the area so as not to be harshly discordant with other nearby buildings. The proposed modifications are in compliance with this criterion. (b) Materials used. A wide variety of both natural and high quality man-made materials are allowed. Examples of acceptable materials include red brick, indigenous stone (i.e., granite, limestone, and marble), architectural concrete, synthetic stucco, wood clapboard (synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles), and glass or glass block. Other materials may be used as an architectural accent provided they are harmonious with the building and site. Examples of unacceptable materials include metal skin and laminated wood (e.g., T-111). Design Review Application DR-04-08 40 San Remo Drive Page 2 of 5 The applicant is proposing to replace the existing overhead doorways with metal siding to match the existing metal siding. The applicant is proposing to replace a very small portion of the total surface, so staff feels that the additional of metal siding is appropriate. However, staff notes that if and when the applicant proposes any major renovations to the exterior of the subject building, metal siding will not be an acceptable material. (c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. The applicant is proposing to match the color of the proposed metal siding with the existing color of the subject building. 1. The color of the proposed metal siding shall match the existing color of the subject building. (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. For sides of buildings that face or front public streets, the majority of the first floor's facade area shall consist of see -through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity, however, the windows and doors should be of human scale, so as to welcome pedestrians. The applicant is proposing to replace the existing door and window on the south side of the building. The proposed door and window are in compliance with this criterion. The applicant submitted details of the proposed door and window (attached). (e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. Only a small portion of roof area may be flat provided it is not visible from the public street, existing or planned, or does not detract from the overall design and harmony of the building. Where portions of a roof are flat, architectural elements such as cornices and parapets shall be included to improve the appearance and provide interest. Large, low -slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are discouraged. This criterion is being met through the proposed project. (t) Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns. New buildings shall be built to the street property line. For existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building better to the public street. Such improvements could include installation of doors and windows facing the public street. Design Review Application DR-04-08 40 San Remo Drive Page 3 of 5 The orientation of the subject building is not being altered through the proposed project (g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application (i) Pedestrian promenade along Market Street. In Design District 1, the provision of a covered pedestrian promenade along Market Street is required in order to protect pedestrians from inclement weather and promote walking. Any pedestrian canopy, or portion thereof, that is proposed to be located within or encroach into the public R. O. W. shall meet the specifications identified in the City Center Streetscape Guidelines. An applicant may elect to incorporate a covered pedestrian promenade as a component of the building and completely on the applicant's property, provided the promenade is at least 10 feet high and 8 feet deep. The Development Review Board may waive the requirement for a covered pedestrian promenade or canopy on a building or portion thereof if the Development Review Board finds that the block on which the building is located is adequately covered by other existing promenades/canopies. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. In addition design plans for properties within Design District 1 shall comply with the following site design criteria as outlined in Section 11.02 of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Landscape and plantings. Significant trees and vegetation should be preserved in its natural state insofar as practicable. Any grade changes should be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas. Landscape plantings and amenities shall be well designed with appropriate variations and shall be included as an integral enhancement of the site and, where needed, for screening purposes. In particular, parking areas shall be well screened by berms, plantings, or other screening methods to minimize their visual impact. Planting islands shall be used to break up larger expanses of paved parking areas. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (b) Integrate special features with the design. Storage areas, machinery and equipment installation, service areas, truck loading areas, garbage and refuse collection areas, utility connections, meters and structures, mailboxes, and similar accessory structures shall be positioned in such a way to minimize visibility from the public street, Design Review Application DR-04-08 40 San Remo Drive Page 4 of 5 existing or planned. Such features shall be incorporated within or designed as part of the building on the site, not added as an afterthought. HVAC equipment should not be pad mounted at grade. Utility connections shall be installed underground and utilities shall co- exist to the greatest extent possible. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (c) Walls, fences or other screening features: Such elements, if used, shall be employed in a skillful manner and in harmony with the architectural context of the development. Such features should be used to enhance building appearance and to strengthen visual linkages between a building and its surroundings. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (d) Accessible open space. When providing open space on a site, it shall be designed to be visually and physically accessible from the public street. Open space should add to the visual amenities of the vicinity by maximizing its visibility for persons passing by or overlooking the site from neighboring properties. If open space is intended for active use, it should include such elements as benches, shade trees, and refuse containers and be so designed to maximize its accessibility for all individuals, including the disabled, and encourage social interaction. The siting of open space on a lot shall also consider the potential impact of buildings, both existing and potential, on shadow casting and solar access. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application (e) Provide efficient and effective circulation. With respect to vehicular and pedestrian circulation, special attention shall be given to the location and number of access points to public streets and sidewalks, to the separation of vehicles and pedestrians, to the arrangement of parking areas and to service and loading areas, and to the location of accessible routes and ramps for the disabled. Site design shall also provide for interconnections, both vehicular and pedestrian, between adjacent properties_ This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (1) Outdoor Lighting. Outdoor lighting shall be designed to be both aesthetically pleasing and functional. The lighting type shall be metal halide, compact fluorescent, and/or induction lamps, and shall be of a white color (e.g., CRI 70 or greater). Light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded to preclude glare and overall illumination levels should be evenly distributed. The applicant did not propose any changes to the existing outdoor lighting. 2. If any changes are proposed to the outdoor lighting, lighting details (cut -sheets) shall be submitted for review. (g) Provide for nature's events. Attention shall be accorded to design features which address the affects of rain, snow and ice at building entrances and on sidewalks, and to provisions for snow and ice removal from circulation areas. Design Review Application DR-04-08 40 San Remo Drive Page 5 of 5 This criterion is not applicable to the subject application (h) Make spaces secure and safe. With respect to personal safety, all open and enclosed spaces should be designed to facilitate building evacuation, and provide reasonable accessibility by fire, police or other emergency personnel and equipment. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (i) Streetscape improvements. An applicant for new development shall be responsible for implementing streetscape improvements (e.g., sidewalks, street lighting, street trees, etc.) within the portion of the public street ROW directly fronting the parcel of land for which development is proposed. Such streetscape improvements shall be in accord with the specifications contained in the City Center Streetscape Design Guidelines. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application 0)1 +tI EFCO Hinge Locations A-) Use hinge program for locations on factyr _,oxd include print out with order. Dim. are from bottom of door to center of pivot prep, with a 84" door opening height. ——————— — — — — —— C\L 84" D.O.H. 765/16" C\L 435/1e" C\L t' 1 ♦ 105he" Bottom of door Dim. are from bottom of jamb to center of hinge with a 84" D.O.H. '1/1e" Bottom door clearance ------- - - - - -- C\L — — 84" D.O.H. 1 77" C\L 44" C\L 11 , Door Hinge location formulas Reference Only Top Hinge = D.O.H. minus 7", minus bottom door clearance Bottom Hinge = 11 ", minus bottom door clearance 1 Intermediate Hinge = D.O.H. divided by 2, plus 2, minus bottom door clearance 2 Intermediate Hinges = D.O.H. minus 18", divided by 3, plus 11 ", minus bottom door clearance = center line of 1 st intermediate hinge D.O.H. minus 18", divided by 3, times 2, plus 11 ", minus bottom door clearance = center line of 2nd intermediate hinge Frame Hinge location formulas Reference Only Top Hinge = D.O.H. minus 7" Bottom Hinge = 1111 1 Intermediate.Hinge = D.O.H. divided by 2, plus 2 2 Intermediate Hinges = D.O.H. minus 18", divided by 3, plus 11 " = center line of 1 st intermediate hinge D.O.H. minus 18", divided by 3, times 2, plus 11 ", minus bottom door clearance = center line of 2nd intermediate hinge Always leave top and bottom hinge locations as above unless customer species locations. All EFCO doors have a 3/32" backset from face of frame to face of door. UNIVERSAL ALUMINUM CORP. u AAMA CERTIFI%�'C MANUFACTURER WARRANTS (1.g0E UAI CONFORMITY TO ANSI/AAMA 302.9-19" 1477-CA 0D--"J v SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR: RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS IDEAL FOR BOTH CONDOMINIUM AND APARTMENT DWELLINGS Series 900 Thermal Single Slide Window 40 SAN REMO DRIVE PROPOSED SOUTH - ALT. #1 SOUTH - ALT #2 ALL OTHER FACADES TO REMAIN AS IS, NO CHANGES PROPOSED Note: Color shown is not accurate. See "Existing" photos for accurate color. No change is proposed to the existing color. 40 SAN REMO DRIVE EXISTING WEST NORTH (not readily visible due to vegetation and Lily fence etc.) Most accurate color rendition MEN ` SOUTH jw------ EAST -f Y ,5N --'nE-M JDF�i VE �I Core_ I 0- i G-tt 3m cY Lt.--- fle-c%i Zo�uE — Cr 0 4 14 Cis VkxS'v yam= Z7)%- PhvCO r-r.flss SITE ALA N (EXISTING) 40 SM REM DRIVE South Budkgtun "Company Sburh+Burirng�tbn, Vermont sc-JEF-- Permit Number DR--L- - ro 9 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW f ® r�tl in oollation requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested fortion either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application bei%rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Boraid. 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): Design Plan Approval ❑ Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) S G U I v r l1n q -10 A Re. 1, '� CO 4 P D, ICJ' ty. ZZ o ' , -�D , 13v,- l i rt 0--tw) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) .S dl M l 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) t\ r9 ky1 (i 6�.eq a r 5) PROJECT STREET ADD SS: n 0 S,,, R.t Lriy2 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) / 5-0 3 3 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. �-o R Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 2 South Burlington City Center Design Review Committee Meeting Monday, December 191h, 2005 6:30 PM City Hall SECOND FLOOR Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street AGENDA: Application #DR-05-09 Dorset Holdings, Inc. (Charles Deslauriers), 345 Dorset Street Single sign permit, Beacon Row town houses 2. Application #DR-05-10 Montpelier Broadcasting, Inc./Pizzagalli Construction, 72 San Remo Drive Installation of communications tower 3. Application #DR-05-11 South Burlington Realty Company, San Remo Drive Amendment of Master Signage Permit and single sign 4. Discussion of City Center and Commercial District design project Respectfully submitted, Juli Beth Hinds, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning South Burlington City Center Design Review Committee Meeting Monday, December 19th, 2005 6:30 PM To: South Burlington Design Review Committee From: Juli Beth Hinds, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning RE: Meeting Monday, December 19th, 2005 Date: December 16, 2005 Agenda: 1. Application #DR-05-09 Dorset Holdings, Inc. (Charles Deslauriers), 345 Dorset Street Master Signage Permit and single free-standing sign, Beacon Row town houses 2. Application #DR-05-10 Montpelier Broadcasting, Inc./Pizzagalli Construction, 72 San Remo Drive Installation of communications tower 3. Application #DR-05-11 South Burlington Realty Company, 40 San Remo Drive Amendment of Master Signage Permit and sign design approval 4. Discussion of City Center and Commercial District design project Agenda Item #1 — Application #DR-o5-09 — MSP and Sign Design Approval Application DR-05-09 is for installation of a single free-standing sign at the Beacon Row town house complex, 345 Dorset Street. This is a 24-unit complex in the CD-3 zoning district that was last reviewed and approved in 1999• This application is for Master Signage Permit approval for a single free-standing sign on Dorset Street. The applicant has submitted the following pursuant to Section 8(c) of the Sign Ordinance: (a) Plot plan showing sign location and landscaping (b) Proposed sign dimensions (c) Design parameters including fonts, colors and materials (d) Lighting options and lighting cut sheets for other parts of the property (previously submitted) Evaluation: (a) Size: the proposed sign is 14.66 square feet in size and 69" tall (5' 9"), which is well within the square footage and height limits for the district (32 SF and 12', respectively). (b) Setback: Section 9(h) of the Sign Ordinance requires signs within the City Center district to be located within a "sign corridor" that runs 16' west from the .f South Burlington City Center Design Review Committee Meeting Monday, December 19th, 2005 6:30 PM edge of the Dorset Street right of way. The farthest extent of the proposed sign would be exactly 16' west of the edge of the right of way, so this standard is met. (c) Landscaping. The plan attached with the application shows a landscaped area near the sign base. This landscaping plan was approved by the DRB. Staff believes this is sufficient and appropriate landscaping. (d) Lighting. The applicant has previously gained approval for light fixtures elsewhere on the property. Two options for lighting the proposed sign have been submitted. One is to have a ground -mounted fixture on either side of the sign. The other is a gooseneck -mounted landscape light that would have one fixture illuminating either side of the sign. Section 21(h) of the Sign Ordinance states "...fixtures shall not include bare bulbs, and fixtures shall not make bare bulbs or other direct light sources visible to persons viewing a sign." Staff feels that either lighting option is acceptable, but care needs to be taken to ensure that the direct light source or bulbs in a gooseneck feature are sufficiently shielded so as not to have bulbs directly visible to pedestrians or those driving. (e) City Center standards. Section 6 of the Sign Ordinance has four criteria for signs in this district: consistent design; promote city center goals; color and texture; and materials used. i. Consistent design. This sign design uses specific treatments that reference the Beacon Hill townhouse buildings, such as using the same paint colors as the trim and siding on the townhouses. I Promote city center goals of pedestrian orientation and high quality. The use of copper and wood accents and quality lighting design, and the scale of this sign (smaller and lower than allowed) both promote a high -quality, pedestrian oriented look for the property. iii. Color and texture. The red and copper accents are compatible with the brick, tan and white colors of the townhouses and form a harmonious overall scheme. iv. Materials used. Again, copper and wood are good choices of materials for the City Center and promote a quality appearance. (f) Other issues. The applicant has not stated whether other signs are desired. Staff recommends the DRC stipulate that any subsequent signs require DRC review prior to approval, and that the materials, fonts, colors, and treatments used on the free-standing sign be utilized for any and all other signs on the property. Specifically: o White or tan backgrounds o Copper, tan, or red accents and trim o Bodoni Block or Trajan Pro Boild fonts South Burlington City Center Design Review Committee Meeting Monday, December 19tb, 2005 6:.go PM o Brackets and structural supports either powder coated or painted to match the background colors. With these conditions, staff recommends approval of this master signage permit and individual sign application. Application #2 — DR-os-lo — Design Plan approval The second application is from Montpelier Broadcasting, Inc. and Pizzagalli Construction for installation of two communications antennas on the roof of the existing Pizzagalli Construction building at 72 San Remo Drive. The applicants have submitted a site plan of the Pizzagalli building, photos of the existing structure (including the 20' tall single antenna existing on the building), and photo simulations of how the property will appear from two points on San Remo Drive after installation of the proposed communications antennas. Communications antennas are a protected use under zoning, meaning that mitigating conditions may not interfere with the installation, operation and use of these devices. The criterion for review of these structures within the City Center zoning district is Section 11.oi(F)(1)(h) of the Land Development Regulations, which states: (h) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. Such features, in excess of one foot in height, shall be either enclosed by outer building walls or parapets, or grouped and screened in a suitable manner, or designed in themselves so that they are balanced and integrated with respect to the design and materials of the building. Staff believes that this application meets the standards in (h) above for several reasons. First, Montpelier Broadcasting has come to an arrangement that puts these communications antennas on an existing building that already has such a structure, and that is farther away from the right-of-way on Dorset Street and San Remo Drive than their building at the corner of Dorset and San Remo. This is visual mitigation in and of itself. Second, the antennas are located in such a manner that they are both grouped with another antenna on an existing roofline, which reduces the amount of change to the existing visual profile, and which makes them largely invisible from Dorset Street since the existing antenna blocks a direct view. Staff thus recommends approval of this design plan. Agenda Item #-3 — DR-os-lr — MSP Amendment and sign approval l South Burlington City Center Design Review Committee Meeting Monday, December igth, 2005 6:�o PM Item #3 is #DR-oS-ii, an amendment to a previously issued Master Signage Permit (DS-02-20) for Randall Munson, 40 San Remo Drive. The existing MSP allowed one wall sign, and the applicant is now asking to amend that approval to allow one free-standing sign and two window graphics, illustrated in the attached application. The applicant has submitted the following pursuant to Section 8(c) of the Sign Ordinance: (a) Plot plan showing sign location and landscaping (b) Proposed sign dimensions (c) Design parameters including fonts, colors and materials (d) Lighting — the applicant states that there are "no plans to provide illumination" for any signage. Evaluation: (a) Size: the proposed wall sign is 21 square feet in size and 7' tall, which is well within the square footage and height limits for the district (32 SF and 12', respectively). Pursuant to Section 18(h) of the Sign Ordinance, window signs may not exceed 25% of the area of the window area to which a sign is attached. There is a note on the application to this effect. (b) Setback: As this property fronts on San Remo Drive, the sign must be set back five feet from the right of way. This standard is met. (c) Landscaping. The plans do not show landscaping of the sign base. Landscaping or planters should be provided when the sign is installed. Staff recommends the DRC condition this approval on submittal of a revised site plan showing landscaping or planters at the base of the sign, with the Administrative Officer to approve prior to issuance of a sign permit. The other landscaping on the property was reviewed and approved by the DRB and exceeds the City's minimum standards. (d) Lighting. The applicant has stated that no illumination is proposed. The applicant needs to be aware that the DRC will need to amend the MSP if illumination is desired in the future. (e) City Center standards. Section 6 of the Sign Ordinance has four criteria for signs in this district: consistent design; promote city center goals; color and texture; and materials used. i. Consistent design. The graphics on the proposed freestanding and window signs are consistent, cleanly designed, and easy to read. They are consistent with the primary structure on site as well. South Burlington City Center Design Review Committee Meeting Monday, December 19th, 2005 6:30 PM I Promote city center goals of pedestrian orientation and high quality. As with the Beacon Townhouse sign, this sign is lower and smaller than the allowable limits. This scale promotes a pedestrian orientation. The graphics are well designed and readable. iii. Color and texture. The materials and color scheme are acceptable and compatible with the site. iv. Materials used. Aluminum and vinyl are suitable in this industrial transition area of the City Center. (f) Other issues. Staff recommends the DRC approve the proposed signs and MSP, with the condition that any subsequent signs other than the freestanding and window signs approved herein require DRC review prior to approval, and that the materials, fonts, colors, and treatments used on the free-standing sign be utilized for any and all other signs on the property. Specifically: o White background o Orange, navy and medium blue logos with black or blue lettering o Consistent fonts o Cedar posts With these conditions, and a stipulation that a revised site plan showing landscaping or planters at the base be submitted to the Administrative Officer, staff recommends approval of this master signage permit and individual sign application. Agenda Item #4 — Discussion of City Center and Commercial District Design Project I would like to have a quick discussion with the DRC on the upcoming City Center and Commercial District design project that is intended to revamp the design review process, potentially expand its scope, and develop a public art and design plan for the City Center. 49 lac,'\ - i I ' I i G w v�y C 1140 ) .� :z ( O/la Ll /00, 0 TRr1NSP°R�hT��NCoRP- I f�t3tr'E �01LD1�16-Ervv�-oi�� Lwr flr-cA - (SISob S.F. �wE — G D 9 14 C-A�s 13vl�-o��-.� aL.p(' tP,tR��w- rkk YV- YAf-fl; fAVC6 00b c,-ft1ss SITE PIA W (EXI STING) 40 SAN RE00 DRIVE South Bur iVWn "O mpany SbU Bur�ngcon, Vermont \1 n k -- 40 San Remo Drive, South Burlington List of Abutting Property Owners October 13, 2004 0120 00068R 68 Barrett Street Robert Richer 68 Barrett Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 0120 00070R 70 Barrett Street Valerie and Kyle Williams 70 Barrett Street South Burlington, VT 05403 1490 00050C 50 San Remo Drive South Burlington Realty Co. APPLICANT 0570 00354C 354 Dorset Street Champlain Oil Co., Inc. P.O. Box 2126 So. Burlington, VT 05407 1490 00036C 36 San Remo Drive Lily Transportation Corp. 14 Rosemary Street Needham, MA 02192 Permit Number SP- d y - 4 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 11 .5 = -? L - e 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) C, (X M e- 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) U� �� ae r R, Yke- 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: l S 4 K t -e wu 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) IS 6 33 911) IN-10 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 ,� ' a) Existing Uses oJ� Property (including description and size of g�eparate use) �-A CT, . c e T n t. 4/'A-L e-D v►o � 4 d �i b) PropoM s0 es on property (include desc remain) ; e _ (,v o r' n and size of each new use and existing uses to c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remaispecify , if basement and mezzanine) �( v O tr -H - 1 k 7 "i �-a- e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) '-`— C) f) Number of employees & company vehicle (existing and proposed, note office v employees): � D#Ov-D,LZ- P,wt,r0 04 r C � , YL o CV m MQ14- g) Other (list any other information pertinent tot ' application not s cifically reques d a ve, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): V L V < <-T 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed_% b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing_j�% Proposed_% c) Front yard (along each street) Existing D % Proposed / Z:> /0 0 C' 4 6, oS� 9) COST ESTIMATES p a) Building (including interior renovations): $ Z-- o o C) -0 ► C• i' o b) Landscaping: $_AVv% 2 r�vDoS J c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): A A O 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b �ty Q- way 1 , �� 1 S�v►y °`"�%� b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out):W�/Sl �j.� (.S vv► d �*i� %) c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): --- 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: vnIDY'k YqS (mk>- 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: -b b y'� t� ��1n i 4 wTf I m b desT v.5e> 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: A-5 14) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: Co - REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee 3 Date South Burlington Realty Company P.O. Box 2204 South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2204 (802) 863-9039 October 13, 2004 Raymond J. Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 40 San Remo Drive Dear Ray: Enclosed herewith are the following: - Request for Conditional Use (Place of Worship) - Application for Site Plan Review (change of use only, no change to site) - Application for Design Review (minor changes to building) - Check for $395.00 ($135 + $185 + $75) This project involves the conversion of the rear storage area to finished space, filling in the overhead door on the south facade with same siding material used on the rest of the building, and the addition of a storefront type door with a roof to match the existing one and a window to match the existing. This plan is shown as "Alt #2" on the enclosed depiction. In addition, we plan to resurface the roof with a membrane material. As seen in the pictures, the low sloped roof really isn't very visible from the street or parking lot, but we will plan to bring a sample of the dark grey material to the design review meeting if needed. Lastly, the main reason for the exterior change, as well as the planned interior renovation, is to change the use of the building to a place of worship. We will be prepared to address the conditional use criteria, or will gladly submit additional supporting materials prior to the hearing if needed. Since few things are ever 100% certain, we would like to obtain approval to build "Alt #1" in the event the church deal does not go through. The second egress door shown in "Alt #2" is required for the church use but probably would not be for most other uses. The church folks would like very much to be in by Christmas so we request that this be scheduled for hearings as soon as possible. If anything else is needed I would welcome your call. Thank you. Prime Real Estate - Commercial, Residential, Industrial Development Design, Build, Lease, Consulting 31 15/2004 12: E8 S028654: 25 SU BURLIN(35TOH REAL-Y PAGE A__ Seth Burlhigion Realtor Compam, South Ihw t'M, `'ernmont. OW7-.` 204 (802') 863-W i4 November 15. 2004 Raymond J. Belair, .Zoning Adnunistrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Buriington, SIT 05403 VIA FACSIMILE 346-41.01 Re: 40 San Remo Drive Dear Ray: Soutb Burlington Realty hereby x%ithdraws the application for Site .Plan and Conditional Use Rvv7ew to change the use of 40 San Remo Drive from "office" to "house of worship" Please contact me if there are any questions. Thank you. Si 1 JO G_Jaeger - � i Prime Real Estate - (;ommerr ia1, 1. esldcmtjal, Indu�ctiial Development T)c,5%,.i,, BuAld;, Lcase. CoxistdtiW 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses o> ,Qpert eC .nM-rr&-0 r o ��-l-C e- (including description and size of each separate use b) roposed Uses o property (inc a description and size each new use and existing uses to remain) Q. L �— pY' Zoo S c) Tot building square e0otage on pro rty (proposed puildings and existing buildings to remain) CJVI a LAI e d) Height of bililding & number of floors (proposedbu ldings and existing buildings to rem specify if basement and mezzanine) H ,_ f4 '' I & h i Q aT P e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees & vehicles (existing and proposed, notg office versus noiyoffice employees) cA e g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application of specifically equested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Ts 1 4 w rl Z-1 �---� 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing �. % Proposed__ b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing L % Propose c) Front yard (along each street) ExistingA� % Proposed 6 10 ��,a� e' S PV-vr (does not apply to residential uses) 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ Zf�'l -�� j . vb 0 1J° r� b) Landscaping: $n e- c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): %-� we.e a s ' 35 5uvt c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): �^ 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: u J in S ryn 6,-qk U 5 e- 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: b r eeCa l; LAta j vi 9.5 trn�eS� USe� 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:` 14) LIST ABUTTERS ( List names and addresses of all abutting property owners on a separate sheet of paper). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. [ 4P., APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee 4 Date CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNP4G & ZON"I C 575 DORSET STREET SOUTI4 EURUNGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FlUrk (802) 846-4101 December 8, 2004 John Jaeger South Burlington Realty PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: Minutes Dear Mr. Jaeger: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the November 9, 2004 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy M cD nough Adminis r,afrve Assistant Encl. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 9 NOVEMBER 2004 3. Consent Agenda: a. Design Review Application #DR-04-08 of South Burlington Realty Company for design review approval for the following exterior modifications: 1) fill-in overhead door areas on south and east sides to :Hatch existing metal siding, and 2) resurface roof with a membrane roof system, 40 San Remo Drive: No issues were raised. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Design Review Application #DR-04-08 subject to the stipulations in the staff recommendations. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. b) Design Review Application #DR-04-10 of Dorset Communications, LLC, for a new Master Signage Permit, so that future tenants are able to receive sign permits, and for approval of a sign in gold, red, black and white, 372 Dorset Strect: Mr. Boucher moved to approve Design Review Application #DR-04-10 subject to the stipulations in the staff recommendations. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-61 and Final Plat Application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) constructing a 26,000 sq. ft. distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south located at the end of Dubois Drive: Mr. Boucher stepped down during this hearing due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Dinklage stressed that the 2 properties will be tied together as one PUD. Mr. Jewkes indicated they have delineated the wetland on the plan. The Natural Resources Committee has made some recommendations, and the applicant has no problem complying with them. Mr. Dinklage asked where they will add to additional wetland space. Mr. Jewkes showed an area outside of all the buffers. Mr. Jewkes noted there were also noise concerns raised by neighbors. Mr. Dinklage noted this is a specifically identified allowable use in this district. Mr. Dinklage asked if there is a connector to the east on the Official City Map. Mr. Belair replied that there used to be. It stops at Muddy Brook. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPAirrMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Brian Robertson, Associate Planner TL-. DATE. November 4, 2004 Cc: John Jaeger DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Design Review Application DR-04-08 40 San Remo Drive South Burlington Realty, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval for the following exterior modifications: 1) fill-in overhead door areas on south and east sides to match existing metal siding, and 2) resurface roof with membrane roof system. The subject property falls within Design District 2 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D)(1)(b) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the addition or alteration of an exterior wall of a building or structure shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). Design plans for properties within Design District 1 shall comply with the following design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.01(F) of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. The design of a building should consider the design features of other structures in the area so as not to be harshly discordant with other nearby buildings. The proposed modifications are in compliance with this criterion. (b) Materials used. A wide variety of both natural and high quality man-made materials are allowed. Examples of acceptable materials include red brick, indigenous stone (i.e., granite, limestone, and marble), architectural concrete, synthetic stucco, wood clapboard (synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles), and glass or glass block. Other materials may be used as an architectural accent provided they are harmonious with the building and site. Examples of unacceptable materials include metal skin and laminated wood (e.g., T-111). Design Review Application DR-04-08 40 San Remo Drive Page 2 of 5 The applicant is proposing to replace the existing overhead doorways with metal siding to match the existing metal siding. The applicant is proposing to replace a very small portion of the total surface, so staff feels that the additional of metal siding is appropriate. However, staff notes that if and when the applicant proposes any major renovations to the exterior of the subject building, metal siding will not be an acceptable material. (c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. The applicant is proposing to match the color of the proposed metal siding with the existing color of the subject building. 1. The color of the proposed metal siding shall match the existing color of the subject building. (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. For sides of buildings that face or front public streets, the majority of the first floor's facade area shall consist of see -through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity, however, the windows and doors should be of human scale, so as to welcome pedestrians. The applicant is proposing to replace the existing door and window on the south side of the building. The proposed door and window are in compliance with this criterion. The applicant submitted details of the proposed door and window (attached). (e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. Only a small portion of roof area may be flat provided it is not visible from the public street, existing or planned, or does not detract from the overall design and harmony of the building. Where portions of a roof are flat, architectural elements such as cornices and parapets shall be included to improve the appearance and provide interest. Large, low -slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are discouraged. This criterion is being met through the proposed project. (t) Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns. New buildings shall be built to the street property line. For existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building better to the public street. Such improvements could include installation of doors and windows facing the public street. Design Review Application DR-04-08 40 San Remo Drive Page 3 of 5 The orientation of the subject building is not being altered through the proposed project. (g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application (i) Pedestrian promenade along Market Street. In Design District 1, the provision of a covered pedestrian promenade along Market Street is required in order to protect pedestrians from inclement weather and promote walking. Any pedestrian canopy, or portion thereof, that is proposed to be located within or encroach into the public R.O. W. shall meet the specifications identified in the City Center Streetscape Guidelines. An applicant may elect to incorporate a covered pedestrian promenade as a component of the building and completely on the applicant's property, provided the promenade is at least 10 feet high and 8 feet deep. The Development Review Board may waive the requirement for a covered pedestrian promenade or canopy on a building or portion thereof if the Development Review Board finds that the block on which the building is located is adequately covered by other existing promenades/canopies. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. In addition, design plans for properties within Design District 1 shall comply with the following site design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.02 of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Landscape and plantings. Significant trees and vegetation should be preserved in its natural state insofar as practicable. Any grade changes should be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas. Landscape plantings and amenities shall be well designed with appropriate variations and shall be included as an integral enhancement of the site and, where needed, for screening purposes. In particular, parking areas shall be well screened by berms, plantings, or other screening methods to minimize their visual impact. Planting islands shall be used to break up larger expanses of paved parking areas. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (b) Integrate special features with the design. Storage areas, machinery and equipment installation, service areas, truck loading areas, garbage and refuse collection areas, utility connections, meters and structures, mailboxes, and similar accessory structures shall be positioned in such a way to minimize visibility from the public street, Design Review Application DR-04-08 40 San Remo Drive Page 4 of 5 existing or planned. Such features shall be incorporated within or designed as part of the building on the site, not added as an afterthought. HVAC equipment should not be pad mounted at grade. Utility connections shall be installed underground and utilities shall co- exist to the greatest extent possible. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (c) Walls, fences or other screening features: Such elements, if used, shall be employed in a skillful manner and in harmony with the architectural context of the development. Such features should be used to enhance building appearance and to strengthen visual linkages between a building and its surroundings. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (d) Accessible open space. When providing open space on a site, it shall be designed to be visually and physically accessible from the public street. Open space should add to the visual amenities of the vicinity by maximizing its visibility for persons passing by or overlooking the site from neighboring properties. If open space is intended for active use, it should include such elements as benches, shade trees, and refuse containers and be so designed to maximize its accessibility for all individuals, including the disabled, and encourage social interaction. The siting of open space on a lot shall also consider the potential impact of buildings, both existing and potential, on shadow casting and solar access. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application (e) Provide efficient and effective circulation. With respect to vehicular and pedestrian circulation, special attention shall be given to the location and number of access points to public streets and sidewalks, to the separation of vehicles and pedestrians, to the arrangement of parking areas and to service and loading areas, and to the location of accessible routes and ramps for the disabled. Site design shall also provide for interconnections, both vehicular and pedestrian, between adjacent properties. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (t) Outdoor Lighting. Outdoor lighting shall be designed to be both aesthetically pleasing and functional. The lighting type shall be metal halide, compact fluorescent, and/or induction lamps, and shall be of a white color (e.g., CRI 70 or greater). Light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded to preclude glare and overall illumination levels should be evenly distributed. The applicant did not propose any changes to the existing outdoor lighting. 2. If any changes are proposed to the outdoor lighting, lighting details (cut -sheets) shall be submitted for review. (g) Provide for nature's events. Attention shall be accorded to design features which address the affects of rain, snow and ice at building entrances and on sidewalks, and to provisions for snow and ice removal from circulation areas. Design Review Application DR-04-08 40 San Remo Drive Page 5 of 5 This criterion is not applicable to the subject application (h) Make spaces secure and safe. With respect to personal safety, all open and enclosed spaces should be designed to facilitate building evacuation, and provide reasonable accessibility by fire, police or other emergency personnel and equipment. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (i) Streetscape improvements. An applicant for new development shall be responsible for implementing streetscape improvements (e.g., sidewalks, street lighting, street trees, etc.) within the portion of the public street ROW directly fronting the parcel of land for which development is proposed. Such streetscape improvements shall be in accord with the specifications contained in the City Center Streetscape Design Guidelines. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application e) L) Hinge Locations Use hinge program for locations on facto d include print out with order. Dim. are from bottom of door to center of pivot prep, with a 84" door opening height. ------- - - - - -- C\L 84" D.O.H. 765/16" C\L -I - - -- I 435/ze" i I ' 7 4 105he" Bottom of door Dim. are from bottom of jamb to center of hinge with a 84" D.O.H. "/ze" Bottom door clearance -® --- -------- 84" D.O.H. I 77" C\L I 44" I _ C_\L Door Hinge location formulas Reference Only Top Hinge = D.O.H. minus 7", minus bottom door clearance Bottom Hinge = 11 ", minus bottom door clearance 1 Intermediate Hinge = D.O.H. divided by 2, plus 2, minus bottom door clearance 2 Intermediate Hinges = D.O.H. minus 18", divided by 3, plus 11 ", minus bottom door clearance = center line of 1 st intermediate hinge D.O.H. minus 18", divided by 3, times 2, plus 11 ", minus bottom door clearance = center line of 2nd intermediate hinge Frame Hinge Hinge location formulas Reference Only Top Hinge = D.O.H. minus 7" Bottom Hinge = 11" 1 lntermediate,Hinge = D.O.H. divided by 2, plus 2 2 Intermediate Hinges = D.O.H. minus 18", divided by 3, plus 11 " = center line of 1 st intermediate hinge D.O.H. minus 1811, divided by 3, times 2, plus 11 ", minus bottom door clearance = center line of 2nd intermediate hinge Always leave top and bottom hinge locations as above unless customer specifies locations. All EFCO doors have a '3/32" baci<set from face of frame to face of .ioor. UNIVEF S-AL ALUMINU Mu CORP .A,AM,A CERT, MANUFACTURER WARRANTS CoNr ORM [TY TO ANSWAAMA 302.3 TT I ,�4 7 '7-- , ;C/L, Series Soo Thermal Single Slide window SPECIFICALLY, DESIGNED FOR: RESOENTAL -AND COMMERCIAL APPUCAMONS IDEAL FoR BOTH ColYDOMINIUM - ANDAPARTMENT DWELLINGS UHIVVISAL ALUMINUM 40 1 SOUTH - ALT. #1 S 0 U 71-1 - L T # 1/1. i OTHER FACADES TC REMAIN AS IS, NO C,R�NGESPROPOSED Note: Color sho-,, is not accurate. See "Ex-i"'z -1 A`-, - efiange proposed to existing color. SAT I 'I,,- ' '0, i -1 R ' -I --- A E � -- - - , --- , -T NORTH (not *",., 1,je fa, vegetation and Lily 1 fence etc. V ---I�Em Dp E ` _ _ _ ~ / p�9 Ya �c•-P�c�: i�.YA49 _L tQ f'I fiPl sm CA fle-cA VkASr Yam= Z;D%. f"co tib!6 CAD li /06 SITE PLAN (EXISTING) 40 MN REM PRIVE j µ South &Iriivton Realty Crmpany Sbuth,8uriin2!� Vermont ILIIlk I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONI' 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 10, 2004 John Jaeger South Burlington Realty PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: Design Review Application #DR-04-08 Dear Mr. Jaeger: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on 11/9/04 (effective 11/9/04). If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 June 15, 2004 William S. Smith III, Esq. Kolvoord, Overton & Wilson, PC 3 Main Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 RE: 40 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Smith: This is in response to your letter of June 8, 2004. On November 24, 1998, site plan approval was granted to change the use of this property from automobile repair and service to retail. On October 9, 2002, site plan approval was granted to change the use from retail to general office. On October 9, 2002, zoning permit #ZP-02-429 was issued to change the use to "Avonda Air Systems, Inc. Office Facility". Therefore, the only use allowed on the property is general office use. It is my understanding that Avonda Air used a portion of this building for a use or uses other than general office or as an accessory use to general office. This activity was a violation of the zoning regulations which the City was not aware was taking place. Unless the use of this property is changed to some other use, the only use allowed on the property is general office use. An accessory use is allowed, but it must be accessory to an office use (storage of office supplies, files, etc) and not storage or other activities related to the business. For example, if the office is being used by a dry wall installation business, the non -office portion of the building cannot be used to store dry wall or any materials associated with the installation of dry wall. The storage of these materials is not accessory to an office use. I hope this is responsive to your request. five Officer 08/11/2004 FRI 13:50 FAX 602 879 0964 Kolvoord Overton Filson Ul'1/001 )�- 2-ydf Law Offices of � 6 Kolvoord, Overton & Wilson, PC 3 Main Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452.3199 Alan D. Overton Gregg H. Wilscr Daniel L. Overton Herbert J. Downing William $. $m4h, III Jason F. Ruwet June 08, 2004 Telephone:802.878-3345 Fax:802-879-0964 Sendar's Direct Email: will essexvtIew.corn Ray 8clair, Zoning Adininistrdtor City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 re: 40 San Remo Drive, Avonda Air Systems, Inc. Dear Ray: Of Counsel Philip A. Kolvoord Paralegal Staff Louise E. Jansen �61y��' Thank you for meeting with :me the other day regarding the property my client leases from South Burlington Realty. As I note,,; in our meeting, my client has not changed its use of the property since the lease began in October, 2002. The usage is for an HVAC facility, office and general use. If you could tell us in writing whether or not the use by Avonda Air is allowed at this property, that would be greatly appreciated. Avonda Air has been trying to sublet the property to similar companies, and claril ;cation on this point is needed. I look forward to hearing from you in the next week. Regards, William S. Smith, lll T1,i 5 fex, including rmnchmcros, is imended for the person(s) or eorrill named and Why cowain confidential and/or legnny privileged information. Unatithorisd dis.'oiaro, G9pying urr use of ibis information mRy be untWW(ul and i> pmhill tl are not the inicndod incipient, Plemr 6s�Qrd this mei., age and attactimcntc wW notiry the wader. c: Robert Avonda, President CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOK DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 13, 2003 Randall G. Munson South Burlington Realty Company P. 0. Box 2204 South Burlington, VT05407-2204 Dear Mr. Munson: Master Signage Permit DR-02-20 II 40 San Remo Drive i Please find enclosed a copy of the Master Signage Permit for San Remo Drive as approved by the Development Review Board at its meeting on February 4, 2003. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please give this office a call. Sincerely yours, 4j? A - Janet M. Hurley Associate Planner kjmh Enclosure \drb\sig n\avo nda\D S-02-20.cor. doc CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPAN'1'MENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Janet M. Hurley, Associate Planner -y' DATE: January 31, 2003 COPY TO: John Jaeger, Owner's Agent Robert Avonda, Applicant Master Signage Permit DR-02-20 40 San Remo Drive On January 28, 2003, the Design Review Committee (DRC) passed a motion to recommend approval of Master Signage Permit DR-02-20 subject to three conditions (see attached motion). The applicant agreed to the conditions. Therefore, the permit application is on the consent agenda for the February 4, 2003 meeting of the Development Review Board (DRB). The subject property is identified as tax parcel ID#1490 00040 C and is located at 40 San Remo Drive within the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District (DS/CC Sign District). Pursuant to Section 6 of the City of South Burlington Sign Ordinance, the erection, alteration, or relocation of any sign within this district shall require design review by the South Burlington DRC and DRB. Section 8 of the Sign Ordinance requires all property owners within the DS/CC Sign District to obtain a Master Signage Permit prior to the issuance of any individual sign permit for the subject property. Section 8(e)(1) requires that the property owner of record be the primary permitee of a Master Signage Permit. The record owner of the property is Randall Munson. A Master Signage Permit must be issued to Randall Munson by the DRB, prior to the issuance of any individual sign permit for the property. Pursuant to Section 8 of the Sign Ordinance, a Master Signage Permit shall establish consistent design parameters for the property to ensure that all signage is in accordance with goals of the DS/CC Sign District. The Master Signage permit shall specify size ranges and the graphic elements to be used to relate multiple signs to one another. The current application consists of a request for only one wall mounted sign on the front facade of the existing building. Therefore, the parameters and design elements for this Master Signage Permit shall be dictated by those approved for the one wall mounted sign. Master Signage Permit DR-02-20 January 31, 2003 Page 2of3 DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA In reviewing an application for signage, the DRB shall consider the following Consistent Design The design of a sign must be compatible and harmonious with the design of buildings on the subject property and nearby. The application shows one wall mounted sign for the single tenant in the building, Avonda Air Systems. The sign is white with black lettering and includes a spare triangular logo of blue and teal. A blue line separates the business name from the additional words, "mechanical contractor." The building has been recently painted beige in keeping with many of the newer buildings along San Remo Drive. The blue and teal colors match the roof and trim colors of many of the same new structures. Promotion of City Center Goals Signs within the DS/CC Sign District should be of high aesthetic quality and pedestrian oriented. Staff believes the sign is of high aesthetic quality. The sign is to be mounted centrally on the front facade of the building more oriented to vehicular traffic than to pedestrian traffic. However, currently there is no sidewalk in front of the building, and pedestrian traffic is not yet significant along this section of San Remo Drive. Therefore, Staff feels the sign is in keeping with DS/CC Sign District goals. Color & Texture A maximum of three colors is encouraged. The proposed sign includes black text and a blue and teal logo on white background. The sign texture is smooth, which is in keeping with the siding of the structure. Staff feels that the sign is compatible and harmonious with buildings in the vicinity. Materials Used The sign will be constructed of luster board with vinyl lettering. Staff contacted the applicant's sign contractor, Kershner Signs, for more information on the materials. Kershner Signs uses luster board almost exclusively. Luster board has a plywood core with a very thin aluminum facing. Staff believes that luster board qualifies as a high quality material and is complementary to the building's siding. WALL MOUNTED SIGNS Section 10 of the Sign Ordinance governs the size and location of wall mounted signs. Pursuant to Section 10(b)(1) a wall mounted sign shall not exceed 5% of the area of the principal public facade or 100 sq. ft., whichever is smaller. The applicant has indicated that the western facade facing San Remo Drive is approximately 14' x 41 1/2', or 581 sq. ft. The proposed sign is 68" x 48", or 22.7 sq. ft. This is less than 5% of the San Remo Drive facade and therefore complies with Section 10(b)(1). Section 10(b)(2) states that a wall mounted sign cannot exceed 15% of the area of the facade to which it is attached. The proposed sign is to be attached to the principle public facade on the San Remo Drive side of the building. As already noted, the sign is less than 5% of the area of this facade. Therefore, the proposed sign complies with Section 10(b)(1). \drb\sign\avonda Master Signage Permit DR-02-20 January 31, 2003 Page 3 of 3 Section 10(c) states that a wall mounted sign shall not project above or below the top of any first floor doorway unless permitted by the DRB. The simulation photo submitted by the applicant is not to -scale, but the applicant has indicated that the height of the sign will be 86 inches and the height of the front doorway is 83 inches. Pursuant to Section 10(d), a wall mounted sign shall not cover any opening or project beyond the top or end of any wall to which it is attached. Based on the simulation photo submitted by the applicant, it appears that the sign will not project over any opening or beyond the top or end of the front facade. Section 10(g) stipulates that a wall mounted sign shall not project from the wall in excess of 9". Based on the cross sectional drawing submitted by the applicant, the sign will not project from the facade more than 2". Table 10-1 limits to two (2) the number of wall mounted signs for a single tenant building with no free standing or landscape feature signs. Again, only one wall mounted sign is proposed. 2. Pursuant to Section 20, all signs shall be of substantial and sturdy construction, kept in good repair, and painted or cleaned as necessary to maintain a clean, safe, and orderly appearance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve the Master Signage Permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must obtain an individual sign permit from the Administrative Officer pursuant to the Master Signage Permit. 2. The Master Signage Permit must be issued to property owner Randall Munson by the DRB, prior to the issuance of an individual sign permit for the property. 3. The Master Signage permit shall allow one 22.7 sq. ft. sign of white background with black text and blue and teal colors mounted on the front facade at 86" and constructed of luster board. 4. Pursuant to Section 20 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance, the sign shall be of substantial and sturdy construction, kept in good repair, and painted or cleaned as necessary to maintain a clean, safe, and orderly appearance. \drb\sign\avonda SOUTH BURLINGTON DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL Master Signage Permit DR-02-20 MOTION by Frank Clark, seconded by Judy Barron, to recommend approval of master signage permit application #DR-02-18 for 40 San Remo Drive, subject to the following conditions: This Master Signage Permit shall allow one sign of white background with black text and blue and teal colors mounted on the front fagade and constructed of luster board. 2. The sign must be mounted at a height above the height of the first floor doorway as per section 10(c) of the South Burlington sign ordinance. 3. The applicant must provide a revised plan indicating the sign height and extent to which the sign projects from the fagade in inches. Judy Barron —Yea/Nay/Abstain Mary Benoit —Yea/Nay/Abstain Frank Clark —Yea/Nay/ Abstain MOTION CARRIED by a vote of 3-0-0 on this 271h day of January, 2003. cADocuments and Settingsyhurleywy Documents\dre\avondaUnotion.doc R & W Gibson Promotional Products Kershner Signs /APO 29 Myers Court So. Burlington, VT 05403-6410 802-864-4791 �e�eh revr�y�d �8 Jax �� 4ddwil I�c'yel%/--�I pl .--j P 1 Lug, R & W Gibson Promotional Products Kershner Signs 29 Myers Court So. Burlington, VT 05403-6410 802-864-4791 City of South Burlington Design Review Committee Minutes of January 27, 2003 The South Burlington Design Review Committee met on Monday, January 27, 3003 at 7:30 PM in the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: Mary Benoit, Chair; Judy Barron; and Frank Clark, Clerk. Also Present. Janet Hurley, Associate Planner; and Bob Avonda, Applicant Chair Mary Benoit called the meetings to order at 7:33 with a quorum of committee members present i R-02-20: Bob Avonda was present to represent the application to the committee. Mr. Avonda clarified that the sign would be 3/" thick and bolted directly to the building to required specifications. MOTION by Frank Clark, seconded by Judy Barron, to recommend approval of master signage permit application #DR-02-18 for 40 San Remo Drive, subject to the following conditions: This Master Signage Permit shall allow one sign of white background with black text and blue and teal colors mounted on the front fagade and constructed of luster board. 2. The sign must be mounted at a height above the height of the first floor doorway as per section 10(c) of the South Burlington sign ordinance_ 3. The applicant must provide a revised plan indicating the sign height and extent to which the sign projects from the fagade in inches. MOTION CARRIED by a vote of 3-0-0. Minutes of December 23, 2002: The committee had no revisions for the minutes of the last meeting. Other Business: Janet Hurley reported that Bernie Gangnon will be resigning from the committee, as he has been transferred to New Hampshire. Judy Barron noted that the committee should contact Tim Duff to see if he is able to continue on the committee. If not two committee positions should be advertised at once. Ms. Barron also noted that she would be unable to attend the next meeting. Mary Benoit may also be unable to attend. Respectfully submitted, Mary Ben�,;Chair Jan6C M. Hurley, AssociatWPlanner City of South Burlington Design Review Committee Meeting City Hall Conference Room 575 Dorset Street Monday, .Tanury 27, 2003 7: 30 PM 7:30 Call to order. Attendance. Additions to/deletions from the Agenda. 732 Public Forum. 735 Master Signage Permit #DR-OZ-20 - Randall Munson 4 Robert Avonda, Applicants. The applicants are requesting approval of a master signage permit for 40 San Remo Drive in the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District. 750 Minutes of December 23, 2002. 755 Other Business 8:00 Adjournment Respectfully submitted e. , , 41 Janet A Hurley, Associate Planner CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Design Review Committee FROM: Janet M. Hurley, Associate Planner Jkk#� DATE: January 23, 2003 COPY TO: John Jaeger, Owner's Agent Robert Avonda, Applicant Master Signage Permit DR-02-20 40 San Remo Drive On December 23, 2003, the Design Review Committee continued its review of Master Signage Permit DR-02-20 until January 27, 2003, because nobody was present to represent the application before the committee. The subject property is identified as tax parcel ID#1490 00040 C and is located at 40 San Remo Drive within the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District (DS/CC Sign District). Pursuant to Section 6 of the City of South Burlington Sign Ordinance, the erection, alteration, or relocation of any sign within this district shall require design review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee (DRC) and Development Review Board (DRB). Section 8 of the Sign Ordinance requires all property owners within the DS/CC Sign District to obtain a Master Signage Permit prior to the issuance of any individual sign permit for the subject property. Section 8(e)(1) requires that the property owner of record be the primary permitee of a Master Signage Permit. The record owner of the property is Randall Munson. A Master Signage Permit must be issued to Randall Munson by the DRB, prior to the issuance of any individual sign permit for the property. Pursuant to Section 8 of the Sign Ordinance, a Master Signage Permit shall establish consistent design parameters for the property to ensure that all signage is in accordance with goals of the DS/CC Sign District. The Master Signage permit shall specify size ranges and the graphic elements to be used to relate multiple signs to one another. The current application consists of a request for only one wall mounted sign on the front facade of the existing building. Therefore, the parameters and design elements for this Master Signage Permit shall be dictated by those approved for the one wall mounted sign. Master Signage Permit DR-02-20 January 23, 2003 Page 2 of 3 DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA In reviewing an application for signage, the DRC and DRB shall consider the following Consistent Design The design of a sign must be compatible and harmonious with the design of buildings on the subject property and nearby. The application shows one wall mounted sign for the single tenant in the building, Avonda Air Systems. The sign is white with black lettering and includes a spare triangular logo of blue and teal. A blue line separates the business name from the additional words, "mechanical contractor." The building has been recently painted beige in keeping with many of the newer buildings along San Remo Drive. The blue and teal colors match the roof and trim colors of many of the same new structures. Promotion of City Center Goals Signs within the DS/CC Sign District should be of high aesthetic quality and pedestrian oriented. Staff believes the sign is of high aesthetic quality. The sign is to be mounted centrally on the front fagade of the building more oriented to vehicular traffic than to pedestrian traffic. However, currently there is no sidewalk in front of the building, and pedestrian traffic is not yet significant along this section of San Remo Drive. Therefore, Staff feels the sign is in keeping with DS/CC Sign District goals. Color & Texture A maximum of three colors is encouraged. The proposed sign includes black text and a blue and teal logo on white background. The sign texture is smooth, which is in keeping with the vinyl siding of the structure. Staff feels that the sign is compatible and harmonious with buildings in the vicinity. Materials Used The applicant indicated that the sign will be constructed of exterior grade plywood or luster board with vinyl lettering. Staff contacted the applicant's sign contractor, Kershner Signs, for more information on the materials. Kershner Signs indicated that it no longer uses exterior grade plywood, due to inadequate glue quality, and instead uses luster board almost exclusively. Luster board has a plywood core with a very thin aluminum facing. Staff believes that luster board qualifies as a high quality material and is complementary to the building's siding. 2. The sign should be constructed of luster board rather than exterior grade plywood. WALL MOUNTED SIGNS Section 10 of the Sign Ordinance governs the size and location of wall mounted signs. Pursuant to Section 10(b)(1) a wall mounted sign shall not exceed 5% of the area of the principal public fagade or 100 sq. ft., whichever is smaller. The applicant has indicated that the western facade facing San Remo Drive is approximately 14' x 41 1 /2', or 581 sq. ft. The proposed sign is 68" x 48", or 22.7 sq. ft. This is less than 5% of the San Remo Drive fagade and therefore complies with Section 10(b)(1). Master Signage Permit DR-02-20 January 23, 2003 Page 3 of 3 Section 10(b)(2) states that a wall mounted sign cannot exceed 15% of the area of the facade to which it is attached. The proposed sign is to be attached to the principle public facade on the San Remo Drive side of the building. As already noted, the sign is less than 5% of the area of this facade. Therefore, the proposed sign complies with Section 10(b)(1). Section 10(c) states that a wall mounted sign shall not project above or below the top of any first floor doorway unless permitted by the DRB. Based on the simulation photo submitted by the applicant, it appears as though the proposed sign may project below the level of the front doorway. Staff recommends that the applicant indicate the exact height of the sign and of the front door. If the sign height is lower than the height of the door, the applicant should justify this to the DRC and DRB. 3. The plans should be revised to indicate the height of the sign and of the front door. If the sign height is lower than the height of the door, the applicant should justify the proposed sign height. Pursuant to Section 10(d), a wall mounted sign shall not cover any opening or project beyond the top or end of any wall to which it is attached. Based on the simulation photo submitted by the applicant, it appears that the sign will not project over any opening or beyond the top or end of the front facade. Section 10(g) stipulates that a wall mounted sign shall not project from the wall in excess of 9". The application does not indicate the extent to which the sign will project from the fagade. 4. The plans should be revised to indicate the extent to which the sign will project from the facade in inches. Table 10-1 limits to two (2) the number of wall mounted signs for a single tenant building with no free standing or landscape feature signs. Again, only one wall mounted sign is proposed. 5. Pursuant to Section 20, all signs shall be of substantial and sturdy construction, kept in good repair, and painted or cleaned as necessary to maintain a clean, safe, and orderly appearance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the Master Signage Permit conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items above. B & W Gibson Promotional Products Kershner Signs 29 Myers Court So. Burlington, VT 05403-6410 802-864-4791 AVO N A AIR SYSTEMS MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR c,oa R & W Gibson Promotional Produce Kershner Signs 29 Myers Court So. Burlington, VT 05403-6410 802-864-4791 City of South Burlington Design Review Committee Minutes of January 27, 2003 The South Burlington Design Review Committee met on Monday, January 27, 3003 at 7:30 PM in the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street_ Members present: Mary Benoit, Chair; Judy Barron; and Frank Clark, Clerk. Also Present: Janet Hurley, Associate Planner; and Bob Avonda, Applicant Chair Mary Benoit called the meeting to order at 7:33 with a quorum of committee members present CR-02-20: Bob Avonda was present to represent the application to the committee. Mr. Avonda clarified that the sign would be W thick and bolted directly to the building to required specifications. MOTION by Frank Clark, seconded by ,Judy Barron, to recommend approval of master signage permit application ##DR-02-18 for 40 San Remo Drive, subject to the following conditions: This Master Signage Permit shall allow one sign of white background with black text and blue and teal colors mounted on the front facade and constructed of luster board. 2. The sign must be mounted at a height above the height of the first floor doorway as per section 10(c) of the South Burlington sign ordinance. 3. The applicant must provide a revised plan indicating the sign height and extent to which the sign projects from the facade in inches. MOTION CARRIED by a vote of 3-0-0. Minutes of December 23, 2002: The committee had no revisions for the minutes of the last meeting. Other Business: Janet Hurley reported that Bernie Cangnon will be resigning from the committee, as he has been transferred to New Hampshire. Judy Barron noted that the committee should contact Tim Duff to see if he is able to continue on the committee. If not two committee positions should be advertised at once. Ms. Barron also noted that she would be unable to attend the next meeting. Mary Benoit may also be unable to attend. Respectfully submitted, Mary Ben rt,,'Chair Jan'M. Hurl , Assoc iat Planner City of South Burlington Design Review Committee Minutes of January 27, 2003 The South Burlington Design Review Committee met on Monday, January 27, 3003 at 7:30 PM in the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: Mary Benoit, Chair; Frank Clark, Clerk; and Judy Barron. Also Present: Janet Hurley, Associate Planner; Bob Avonda, Applicant Chair Mary Benoit called the meeting to order at 7:33 with a quorum of committee members present. DR-02-20: Bob Avonda was present to represent the application to the committee. Mr. Avonda clarified that the sign would be 3/4" thick and bolted directly to the building to required specifications. MOTION by Frank Clark, seconded by Judy Barron, to recommend approval of master signage permit application #DR-02-18 for 40 San Remo Drive, subject to the following conditions: 1. This Master Signage Permit shall allow one sign of white background with black text and blue and teal colors mounted on the front fagade and constructed of luster board. 2. The sign must be mounted at a height above the height of the first floor doorway as per section 10(c) of the South Burlington sign ordinance. 3. The applicant must provide a revised plan indicating the sign height and extent to which the sign projects from the facade in inches. MOTION CARRIED by a vote of 3-0-0 Minutes of December 23, 2002: The committee had no revisions for the minutes of the last meeting. Other Business: Janet Hurley reported that Bernie Gangnon will be resigning from the committee, as he has been transferred to New Hampshire. Judy Barron noted that the committee should contact Tim Duff to see if he is able to continue on the committee. If not two committee positions should be advertised at once. Ms. Barron also noted that she would be unable to attend the February meeting. Mary Benoit may also be unable to attend. The meeting was adjourned at 7:55. c:Documents and Settings\ihurley\My Documents\dre\min\012703.min.doc CITY OF SOUTH BUR LINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 23, 2003 Mr. John Jaeger South Burlington Realty Company P. ®. Box 2204 South Burlington, 14T 05407-2204 Dear Mr. Jaeger, Please find enclosed an agenda and staff report to the South Burlington Design Review Board concerning the application for a master signage permit for 40 San Remo Drive. If you have any questions concerning the enclosed information or the review process, please give me a call at 846-4114. Sincerely, Janet IVI. Turley Associate Planner %mh Enclosures Design Review Committee Memo �n Sign Location: the proposed sign location is as shown on the elevations enclosed. �3�°Z Shape: The sign shape is oval, which is consistent with Master Signage Permit. 5) Avonda Air Systems, Faster siganage Permit, 40 San Remo Drive FREESTANDING SIGN The applicant does not propose a freestanding sign. WALL SIGN Computation of maximum: The maximum signable area is 29.05 square feet. The applicant proposes a 22.6 square feet. Color scheme: The proposed colors are blue, green and black on white background. Pursuant to Section 6 of the sign ordinance the use of three (3) predominate colors is encouraged. To provide consistent foreground, text, and background color schemes. Letter styles and graphics: The sign text is a block style of lettering (please see enclosed renderings). Materials: The proposed sign is constructed from luster board. Lighting: No lighting is proposed. Sign Location: The proposed location is on the premier fayade on the building facing San Remo Drive (please see enclosed). Shape: The sign shape is rectangular. Permit Number DR- CQ - �o CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested on this application .must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review Before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): 11 Design Plan Approval k'*� Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER. OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fw,- #} 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 12 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Lxy-f AV 6Y10��- 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 0 scr) 4�c" to Z ri v11e a-,(- J b) TAX PARCEL, ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement, or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. Gam. Uu�L (� C"U V2 5 The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11 " x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. f ,,i SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT �—A DATE OF SUBMSSION: ,� . � r : -1 01-1 •eP� .ice. �:7 Do not write below this line I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 9 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 6, 2002 John Jaeger South Burlington Realty PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: Final plat and site plan approval for Munson Earth Moving, Hinesburg Road, and Design Review approval for South Burlington Fealty, 40 San Remo Drive. Dear Mr. Jaeger: Please find enclosed the Findings of Fact and Decision of the Development Review Board approvals on November 5, 2002. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Stephanie A. Smith Associate Planner The City of South Burlington • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO November 5, 2002 MEETING Special Features: None proposed. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS: 6. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 7. This approval of the proposed renovation is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 8. Any change to the site plan or elevations shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 9. The elevations shall be revised to show uniformity of size not to exceed two different window widths, one window width being the same as the standard for "Citi Financial". 10. A Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance shall be obtained prior to occupancy of the storefront. C) DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION #DR-02-17 OF SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY CO. This project consists of elevation alterations to the north, south, and west elevations on the existing metal skin building. The changes include: 1) addition of one window on the northern elevation, 2) addition of one window on the western elevations, 3) replacement of a window on the southern elevation, and 4) painting the structures southern and western elevations beige, 40 San Remo Drive. Non- complying structure: The applicant is requesting design review for a non- complying structure in the Central District 2. The applicant may propose alterations to the facade and finishes, Section 26.002 (c) of the zoning regulations. Consistent design: The applicant proposes minor alterations to a non -complying structure. These alterations include the addition of two windows, one on the west and one on the north side of the building, and replacing a window on the south side. The construction of all proposed windows is the same, but not the same as existing windows on the building. The applicant also proposes painting the visible public side elevations of the building classic ivory, to match 50 San Remo Drive. This creates a corridor of consistent buildings where currently there is no consistency between properties. 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO November 5, 2002 MEETING Windows and doors: The applicant is proposing two (2) new windows, one on the west and one on the north side of the building, (cut sheets enclosed). The premier elevation of the building does not have a rhythm of window openings. Staff suggests the finish on the proposed windows be white, because the current window finishes are white. Materials: The applicant proposes no changes in siding materials. Colors and textures: The applicant proposes to paint the south and west side of the building same color as 50 San Remo Drive (paint chip provide on the color handouts). Is the chip provided in the handouts accurate? If not the applicant should provide an accurate color chip. Staff recommends painting the northern side of the building as well. The proposed window trim is bronze. Staff suggests proposed additional windows' trim be painted white to match existing window trim. Human scale design: Nothing proposed. Screening: The dumpsters should be screened and so noted on the plan Lighting: The exterior non-downcasting and non -shielded fixture on the southern elevation shall be removed or replaced with downcasting and shielded fixtures approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning prior to installation. Other: On the property there is an existing pad mounted air conditioning unit. This should be shown on the site plan. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The site plan and elevations shall be revised to show the changes listed below. Three copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted prior to issuance of a zoning permit. a) The site plan shall be revised to note the dumpster area as a "screened dumpster storage area". b) The window trim shall be white or the same as the existing window trim. c) The elevations shall note that the northern, western and southern elevations shall be painted classic ivory as proposed. d) The site plan shall note the location of the pad mounted air-conditioning unit. e) All doors are to be painted white or same as existing. fl The dumpster storage area shall be screened with stockade fence or similar material. 3) All exterior non-downcasting and non -shielded fixtures shall be removed or replaced with downcasting and shielded fixtures approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning prior to installation. 5 ` DEVELOPM0141[' REVIEW BOARD MEMO November 5, 2002 MEETING 4) This approval of the proposed renovation is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 5) Any change to the site plan or elevations shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 6) A Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance shall be obtained prior to use of the structure. 4) JOHN LARKIN, PRELIMINARY PLAT,1545 HINESBURG ROAD (MARCEAU MEADOWS) This project was continued from the September 3, 2002 meeting (minutes enclosed) to allow the applicant time to provide additional information. The applicant provided answers to a number of questions raised at the last meeting. A letter from Llewellyn - Howley dated August 26, 2002 is enclosed for your review. This project consists of a planned residential development consisting of 1) the transfer of density from 42.05 acres of adjoining land to two (2) parcels totaling 61.2 acres, 2) subdividing a 56.2 acre parcel into 51 single family lots and 3) constructing 71 multi- family units in 24 buildings, 1539 & 1545 Hinesburg Road. This property lies within the SEQ District, the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Overlay Zone, and the Conservation and Open Space District. It is bounded on the north by Butler Farms, on the west by the Dorset Heights development, and south by residences and on the east by Hinesburg Road and residences. Access: Access is proposed via a city street from Hinesburg Road, intersecting opposite Van Sicklen Road. A city street is proposed to connect with Butler Farms utilizing a reserved r.o.w. called Link Street on the plans. The applicant is also proposing to reserve a r.o.w. to connect to the Old Cross Road r.o.w. extension. At the previous meeting, the Board requested the access shown thru to the Chittenden property avoid the CO District/wetland buffer indicated as "wetland A" on the plan. The plan has not been revised to incorporate this request. Proposed access to the largest cluster of the multi -family housing is via a proposed city street. Multi -family units V, W, and X will have a single curb cut off Old Cross Road Extension. No single family lot would exit onto Old Cross Road Extension. All single family units are serviced by a 60 foot r.o.w. called Rebecca Drive, proposed as a public street. A 30 foot r.o.w. is being reserved to provide access to an exiting two (2) acre lot owned by Michael Marceau between lots #7 and #8. This access is noted on the plan. 2 0 V I MRIMN m 4(Z South Burlington Realty Company P.O. Box 2204 South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2204 (802) 863-9039 October 31, 2002 Stephanie Smith South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 40 San Remo Drive Dear Stephanie: Attached are the revised Site Plan and elevations for the 40 San Remo Building. The Site Plan has been revised as follows: - A stockade fence screen has been added to the dumpster storage area. - The (newly) "screened dumpster storage area" has been properly labeled. - The HVAC pad has been shown. - The gas meter has been shown. - The electric meter has been shown. The elevations have been revised to indicate that the "ivory" paint will be applied to all four facades, rather than just the south and west facades. In response to the DRC approval motion, we also agree as follows: - The window trim shall be white. - All doors will be painted "ivory". - Any exterior light fixtures which are not shielded and downcast in conformance with current South Burlington standards will be replaced with fixtures which have been approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning. I plan to attend the DRB meeting on Tuesday, November 5. Thanks much for your timely assistance at the DRC meeting this week! Prime Real Estate - Commercial, Residential, Industrial Development Design, Build, Lease, Consulting a', 0 yl Wit I No Text 4111t Mir Woos--- UNIVERSAL ALUMINUM CORD ua AAM-AC ERTIFI _ MANUFACTURER WARRANTS I i.00E UA-1 CONFORMITY TO A14SUAAMA ]C2.1-19T7 A MCA (e-Lp�3 SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR: RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS IDEAL FOR BOTH CONDOMINIUM ..:AND- APARTMENT DWELLINGS Series 900 Thermal Single Slide Window WINDOWSUNIVERSAL ALUMINUM vv■ ■vim+ v vv ■ ■ •v1 I A ELAN V11 Iy11U %_Y11UU Concept: To give the contractor/builder the most advanced window system with budget in mind. Features: • "';a" Douce r Tri leGlazed •�Prrime — With Fin • Replacement — No FinJ • Vertical Stacking • Horizontal Mulling • Frame and Sash Thermally Broken • Complete AAMA Testing • Fixed Glass/Panel System • Brass Adjustable Tandem Sash Rollers • Fin -Seal Weatherstripping • White or Bronze P ' ec Finishes • Extr Jed Half Screens • Heavy Duty Frame • Self -Locking Latches • One -Way Weep Housing • High Performance Rating Options: • High Performance Low-E Glazing • Internal Colonial Muntins • External Historic Muntins • Custom PPG Colors • Tinted Glass • Interior Snap Trim • Receptor Systems • Panning Systems • 130 and 450 Mulling Systems CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNEgG & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 FAX COMER SHEET TO: FROM: FAX 25 -DATE: NUMBER OF PAGES 041 C C� `r �oSSi3� r�� `�r� ��rZ -ram-ro vov � �A-0\� c� IV lz� PIC 1�4_� 10/28/02 MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL South Burlington Realty, 40 San Remo Drive I move the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application #DR-02-17 of South Burlington Realty seeking design review approval for elevation alterations to the north, south, and west elevations. The changes include: 1) addition of one window on the northern elevation, 2) addition of one window on the western elevation, 3) replacement of a window on the southern elevation, and 4) painting the structures southern and western elevations classic ivory, 40 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a one (1) page plan and elevations, the plan entitled "Site Plan (Existing) 40 San Remo Drive", prepared by J. Jaeger, dated 10/21/02, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The site plan and elevations shall be revised to show the changes listed below. Five copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted prior to Development Review Board review. a) The site plan shall be revised to note the dumpster area as a "screened dumpster storage area". b) The window trim shall be white or the same as the existing window trim. c) The elevations shall note that the northern, western and southern elevations shall be painted classic ivory as proposed. d) The site plan shall note the location of the pad mounted air-conditioning unit. e) All doors are to be painted white or same as existing. 0 The dumpster storage area shall be screened with stockade fence or similar material 3) All exterior non-downcasting and non -shielded fixtures shall be removed or replaced with downcasting and shielded fixtures approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning prior to installation. 4) This recommendation for approval of the proposed renovation is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 5) Any change to the site plan or elevations shall require approval by the South Burlington Design Review Committee. 6) The applicant is required to obtain approval from the Development Review Board. I f C. D StTE PI 11Wi (EXISTING) 4Q SAN RE00 ORIVE - South Burlington Realty Company SbuEh 8urliwtan, Vertrionf I i �N --F� E wo J) R I � F- -13,U LD I Nam' VNUZY , o .cj :e Xlb A� a �-4 jity of So. B FAX NO. : 1 602 658 4748 �. 21 2002 02:18PM P1 Permit Number�.- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested orz this application must be completed in full_ Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in our being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committer and Development Review .Board, 1) Approval is being sought for (check all tlxut apply): Y-- Design Plan Approval 0 Sign Design Approval ? OWNER OF REC 12D (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #} �y V I�„� K_ .o z,o�, _ �� 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax V1q� er' S el M -2 5) PROJEECSTREET ADDRESS: 6) TAX PARCEL M # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) (' --� O 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement or modification for which design review approval is being sought. if sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. a- LV n e, e vi cy o w o n (Li orLe new w%.-� videi 0V1 Nar' TiAd ow on aJ-Tt,, Ga de a^vl-T- o�i1n -;F&C-o, e-&. bpi e a^e a` p' r --Ifo r- pl n c_e vf- b v 1 d i N 9 ar M A L oq e- t ee-s =C-� el re ,oCa ce— A t& %j.e rt r 'ity of So. B ) FAX NO. : 1 802 658 4748 21 2002 02:19PM P2 The information listed on ExIiibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. rive (5) regular size copies and one reduced coit x Plan, building elevations, sign details) muspt belsulml1 "') f all required Plans and drawings (e.g., site I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge_ Do not write below t1us�Iiue DATE OF SM&ssrom I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: Coirmlete 0 incomplete Director & inning or Designee 1-1 012 Z S yQ L - CITE' OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 11, 2002 John Jaeger South Burlington Realty Company PO Box 2204 South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2204 Re: Office, 40 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Jaeger: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision issued by the Director of Planning & Zoning on 10/9/02. Please note the conditions of approval including the condition that the plan be revised. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely,, r i R2^ 4" J. Belair Y Administrative Officer Encl. I C1TY OF SOT-= BURLJ� ACTT, E I V E D DEPART,vml�'T r 'oIFL�.rNE'4G Z ZONUq G ' SL;) 3 � 2002 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTOi 1, +l'ERMONT 05403City of So. Burlington (802) 846-4106 F� (802) 846-4101 Permit Number SP- ,,�--1 - APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the renew before the Development review Board. t) OWNER OF ECO Tame as shown on deed, mailing )Lnedfx#)aea ��UIM, . VT OS -Lit 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPLTCAi>TT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax a Vn -9 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax 4) �b � � � Q e- 5 a P'RO,TEC.T STREET ADDRESS 6) TAX PARCEL TD 4 {can be obtained at Assessor's Office) / 5-b3 3 a o a b 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existag Uses on Proms b) size of each separate use description and size pf each new c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings d) Height of buildingy& number of Moors (propose bu and mezzanine) I b-3'L- i hI ` L l existing uses to remain) emsting buildings to remain) e) tNurnNr of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain f) 3\iumber of empioy s & oomprC4 VVellicles (existi-ng ' d proposed, note P 1 " � _",Q ay e. e S r)� c. e , e n E) v, - aJ t� to r epain, specify if basement -- p I - -in -offi ce employees i g) Other "list any ;.ether i.-.forrnation ert•Lnent m tis application net smecMi -cal jr equested above, 8) LOT COVERAGE a.) Building: Ems=g_� % Proposed_J:1_0/a b) Over ail (building, pazj�ng, outside storage, etc) //r Existii� _% Proposed LP c) Front yard (along each street) E-.stin ::� `o % Proposed 9) COST ESTUvfATES a) Euillding (includimg interior renovations): $ / V o ©S�� 'c) Landscaping: c) Other site impruvements (please list ,xith cost): 10) ESTRNAATED TRAFFIC a.) Average daily one for entire pro in and out): C) G! b) A.1A Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.IVI Peak hour for entire property (in and out):� c�e 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPER ATIONT : EV42 ( - M 0 r T r 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: � � � — �p ✓"1) ,�� l4- ��; � Z �S -7 —� x -7� r� 13) ESTUVIATED PROJECT COMPLET 01*1 DATE: C."n tj h q e -T SQ (0 Vt ` � vn e. �J o v� o� �Q,O ✓' c/ 14) SATE PLAN A1,`1D FEE A site pan shall be submittedwhichshows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Fire (5) reguiar size copies and one reduced copy (11" <3 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the CrEY at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 1 hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of any knowledge. Do not write below this line DATE OF SUENHSSION: ( (P REVIEW AU71-IOR17f: ❑ Development Review Board 0- Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: ❑ complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee -mo IL - ow Rf D (COA,np,-44AJ VALLPl V,94141VIL!5) c,jrH E- Tylo M AIPLE: le Ike -A v(6 t'� I r- Lwr JiO-CA 1) C— A,6-- 5 -7 '��aT YMz�.: � �a r'A�1E� � y%� "1 CrtJi�`� /� ��..((//__ /. _ �i{ SITE PW4 (EXISTING) 40 S A NJ R E 0 0 [) R 11 V outh Burll6gtan Res6 Cxvrp ev, y Sbuto) F,,vrCiv tanx Venriont RECEIVED � ("i SEP '�� U 2002 City of So. Bmrfington a CITYOF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 28, 199 9 John Jaeger South Burlington Realty Company 366 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Auto Repair to retail, 40 .San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Jaeger: Enclosed is a copy of the November 24, 1998 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Planning & Zoning JW,'mcp I End CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 26, 1999 John Jaeger South Burlington Realty Company 366 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Auto Repair to Retail, 40 ,San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Jaeger: Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on November 24, 1998 (effective 1/19/99). Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. eith, Director ng & Zoning JW/mcp Encl SITE PLAN ESCROW AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, executed in triplicate by and between SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY CO., hereinafter referred to as Developer", the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, hereinafter referred to as "Municipality", and the CHITTENDEN BANK , hereinafter referred to as "Bank". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has received site plan approval from the MUNICIPALITY'S Planning Commission for the development of property located at 40 San Remo Drive, So. Burlingtop as depicted on a site plan entitled " Site Plan, 40 SanRemoDr!', dated 11/25/98 and prepared by South Burlington Realty Company WHEREAS, Developer is required by said approval, at its own expense, to complete certain improvements; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement wish to establish an escrow account to secure the obligations of the Developer as set forth in the City approval; and WHEREAS, the Bank executes this Agreement solely in the capacity of escrow agent. NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. DEVELOPER will, at its own expense, complete the following construction as depicted and in accordance with the specifications set forth in said site plan and related documents: Maple tree, 2 1/2 inch, and additional lawn area to replace two parking spaces in front of building 2. The Developer shall complete the improvements set forth in Paragraph one no later than Improvements were completed. on 11/25/98. 3. DEVELOPER shall replace or repair any defective or improper work or materials which may be recognized within three (3) years after completion of the improvements set forth in Paragraph one. For the purpose of this Agreement "completion" shall be deemed to have occurred when the MUNICIPALITY has inspected and approved the construction of all the improvements required by this Agreement and issued written notice to the DEVELOPER that the construction is complete. 4. For the guaranty of Developer's performance of all requirements hereinabove set forth, and prior to the issuance of any zoning permit for —retail store , Developer and Bank agree that the sum of $240.00 shall be set aside and held in escrow by the Bank 1Z and shall be available for payment to the Municipality- in accordance with the terms herein set forth. 5. If the Municipality shall file with the Bank a statement that the Developer is in the judgement of Municipality in default under the terms of this Agreement, the Bank shall from time to time pay monies from said escrow fund to the Municipality, in amounts not to exceed a total enabling the Municipality to complete improvements and requirements set forth in this Agreement. 6. The Municipality will promptly submit to the Developer a copy of such statement as it files with the Bank. The consent of the developer to such payment by the Bank to the Municipality shall not be required. The Bank shall incur no liability to the Developer on account of making such payment to the Municipality, nor shall the Bank be required to inquire into the propriety of any claim by the Municipality of default on the part of the Developer or into the use of such funds by the Municipality in completing such improvements. 7. The Municipality shall not file with the Bank a statement of default until thirty (30) days after notice has been sent by it to the Developer by certified mail, return receipt requested, setting forth its intention to do so. 8. All monies released by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to paragraph five (5) shall be used by the Municipality solely for the purpose of performing obligations imposed upon the Developer by that portion of this Agreement upon which the Developer is then in default. Any work to be performed by the Municipality pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis or shall be performed by the Municipality with its own work force and equipment or shall be accomplished in such manner as in the judgement of the Municipality shall accomplish the work most expeditiously and economically. 9. If monies are released by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to paragraph five (5) and it shall later develop that a portion of the released monies are surplus to the Municipality's needs, any such surplus shall be refunded by the Municipality to the Bank to be held and distributed by the Bank pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 10. The Bank will not refuse or delay to make such payments to the Municipality when requested by the Municipality by the appropriate statement, and Developer will not interfere with or hinder such payments by the Bank to the Municipality. Said statement shall contain a certificate of compliance with the notice requirements of paragraph seven (7) of this Agreement. 11. This Agreement shall terminate and shall be of no force or effect upon performance of all requirements contemplated hereby, and the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph three (3) . 12. The sum of $ 240.00 shall be maintained in escrow until certification to the Bank by the Municipality of the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph three (3) . 16 13. This Agreement shall not only be binding upon the parties hereto, but also their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. Dated at this day of L , 199 -.A SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY COMPANY WitnLvss c By: fitness Duly 4thized Age t Dated at this day of=- 19 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Witne s By:)�-J'R)-- V ne s Duly Authorized Agent Dated at V9441t4a , this day of , 199 (NAME OF BANK�-73RD PARTY) r. ANK Witn s - t By: Witness Duly Authorized Agent 3 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Planning Commission. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) ,Stv-C6 L-50r1;4,7 I,C n 10\ea V . •' 36b Dor-5a ST,, Burlin j 1 oH/ ITT 0,S403_ T�.l, Rn34 Pd,,,,t X6,57- 4l 4- S. 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) r i 13url��aTo� ea fi Co �� gorse SZ'..5�`3�r �� V Tom( -ctv3R F 6 s-- qr ZS= 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: q G Sam Ke vn v Dr"i v c- 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including des ription a d size o each separate use) D Se,r v� i c-e — i� b w6Z� z b) ProTrIa-d ed Uses (ih-dude description and size of each n w use and existing uses to remain) sf hicba L, Yb4 s .f rye cis _�--710��_ttren�/r z'�Tti. �o Z°y�Si -to✓•(A ��: c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) \' e k d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) � S �r U r (� 7�o rc CIF � L e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): '- g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above) - 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing_ % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, gutside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed % c) Front yard (along each treet) Existing % Proposed 'ctc ce 55 ct 6 v�� 8) COST ESTIMATES n- a) Building: $ V►'"'` i b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic (in and out): e� 1 X. b �r b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour (In and out): 10 PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: �� e-a�v (! �` 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: _ e.-v'e-w 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 4LW ee -a A 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. DATE OF SUBMISSION REVIEW AUTHORITY IGNATU'RE SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line Planning Commission ® City Planner I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete ® Incomplete City Planner or Designee (Apfrmsp) Date PLANNING COMMISSION 24 NOVEMBER 1998 PAGE 8 Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the expansion will generate 1.18 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 3. The applicant shall post a $5765 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 4. The plan shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Three copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to permit issuance. a) The site plan shall be revised to show additional landscaping to meet the minimum landscaping requirement. b) The site plan shall be revised to note that the four Norway Maple trees to be added shall have a minimum size of 2-1/2" caliper and the White Pine shall be a minimum of 7' - 8'. c) The site plan shall be revised to show the delineated edge of the wetland and the location of 50 foot C.O. District/wetland buffer. d) The site plan shall be revised to add a bike rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regula- tions. 5. The two pole mounted floodlights shall be replaced with downcasting shielded fixtures. The three existing building mounted floodlights are approved to remain. It is the Commission's opinion that these floodlights are necessary to assure the safety of planes traveling to and from the hangars. 6 The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this aDDroval is null and void. 7. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the use of the addition. 8. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Site Plan Application of South Burlington Realty to convert a 3200 sq ft. building from automobile repair and service to retail PLANNING COMMISSION 24 NOVEMBER 1998 PAGE 9 40 San Remo Drive: Mr. Jaeger said this has been Blondins and then Manny's auto body shops. They propose to change to a specialty retail store which will bring the use into conformance. There will be no exterior changes to the building. There will also be no outside storage. The proposed tenant is Fasten -All. Lighting will be changed from floods to downshielded wall lights. They have planted a 2-1/2" caliper red maple tree in the front to meet the landscaping budget. Mr. Burgess suggested grassing in the extra parking space. Mr. Jaeger said they would offer to grass in 1/2 of the front area. Members wanted two parking spaces grassed in. Mr. Burgess asked about screening for the dumpster. Mr. Jaeger said it is screened on 3-1/2 sides and is not visible from the street. Members were OK with this. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of South Burlington Realty to convert a 3200 sq. ft. building from automobile repair and service to retail, 40 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan (Existing) 40 San Remo Drive South Burlington Realty Company South Burlington, Vermont," dated November 12, 1998, with the following stipulations: 1 All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded bV this approval shall remain in effect. 2 For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the change in use will generate 4.02 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 3 The applicant shall post a $240 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 4 The plan shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Three copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to permit issuance. a) The site plan shall be revised to eliminate the two parking spaces in front of the building and the area converted to lawn. PLANNING COMMISSION 24 NOVEMBER 1998 PAGE 10 b) The site plan shall be revised to note the type and size (must be a minimum of 2-1/2" caliper) of the proposed tree. 5. All new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall require approval of the Director of Plannina & Zonina Drior to installation. 6. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 7. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the newly converted space. 8. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission 9. As expressly represented by the applicant, there shall be no outside storage or display of merchandise. Mr. Dinklage seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Sketch Plan application of Highland Development Company, LLC to amend a previously approved planned residential development consisting of 244 residential units and an 18 hole golf course. The amendment consists of resubdividing eight lots (lots #80-87) by shifting seven of them 60 feet to the south, Golf Course Rd: Mr. Marshall said there was originally a 20 ft. r.o.w. for access to the golf course. With reconfiguration, this access is not required. They will instead create a 60 ft. r.o.w. access to the remaining undeveloped area. As part of the design of the golf course, they changed the location of tees. Several landed on property lines. They want to alter (reduce) some lots because of this. Mr. Dinklage asked about the bike path which appears to come out to the street. Mr. Marshall said that is an error. He showed the route of the bike path. Mr. O'Rourke said he wanted the applicant to understand that allowing the r.o.w. change does not indicate an OK for any further building on the property. Memorandum - Planning November 24, 1998 agenda items November 20, 1998 Lot size/frontage: It appears that the resubdivided lots will maintain their current lot size and frontage. The final plat plan should include the metes and bounds information for the resubdivided lots. View protection: The plan shows the view protection zone limits and baseline. 9) SOUTH BURLiNGTON REALTY - AUTO REPAIR TO RETAIL - SITE PLAN This project consists of converting a 3200 square foot building from automobile repair and service to retail. The ZBA on 11/9/98 granted the applicant a conditional use permit for the retail use. Approval from the City Council is needed since a public hearing has b/een warned for a zoning change to create the design review overlay district in this area. The City Council reviewed this application on 11/16/98 and decided that the applicant does not need to comply with the proposed design review criteria. This property located at 40 San Remo Drive lies within the CD4 District. It is bounded on the north by a trucking terminal, on the south by a printing use, on the east by a residence, and on the west by San Remo Drive. Access/circulation: Access is provided by 32 foot curb cut on San Remo Drive. No change proposed. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 17% (maximum allowed is 40%). Overall coverage is 60% (maximum allowed is 90%). Front yard coverage does not apply in this district. The building does not meet the setback requirements as it is partially located outside of the required building envelope. Alterations to this noncomplying structure are subject to the limitations in Section 26.002 of the zoning regulations. Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R The floor area ratio is 0.17 (maximum allowed is 0.5). Parking: A total of eight (8) spaces are required and 21 spaces including one (1) handicapped space and a bike rack are provided. Staff recommends that the two (2) parking spaces in front of the building be eliminated and the area converted to lawn. 7 Memorandum - Planning November 24, 1998 agenda items November 20, 1998 Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $240 which is being met. A tree of unknown type and size is proposed along the front. The plan should be revised to note the type of tree proposed which should be a minimum of 2 '/2" caliper. Sewer: No additional allocation needed. Traffic: ITE estimates the current use to generate 11.34 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour and the proposed use to generate 15.36 vte's for a 4.02 vte increase. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximately $750. Lighting: Proposed exterior lights consist of two(2) 50 watt halide lamps with downcasting shielded fixtures mounted on the building. Dumpster: The applicant prefers to not screen the dumpster. It is his position that the building, existing vegetation and fencing at the property line provide adequate screening. 10) HCA AIRPORT REALTY - ADDITION - SITE PLAN This project consists of constructing a 1600 square foot addition to a 10,000 square foot airplane hangar. The last review of this property was on 10/17/89 (minutes enclosed). This property located behind 3060 Williston Road lies within the Airport Industrial District. It is bounded on all sides by airport property. Access/circulation: Access is provided by a private r.o.w. from Williston Road. No change proposed. Circulation/setbacks: Coverage information for the airport is not available due to its vast size. Setback requirements are met. Parking: A total of 34 spaces are provided including two (2) handicapped spaces. The plan should be revised to provide a bike rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. Landscaping_ The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $4050 which is not being met. Proposed plantings, which include Arborvitae, Spirea, Rhodendendron, Dogwood, City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802) 658-7955 November 20, 1998 John Jaeger South Burlington Realty Company 366 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Auto Repair to Retail, 40 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Jaeger: ZONING (802)658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, November 24, 1998 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Director of Planning & Zoning JW/mcp Encls �6T N`F <�T� 3 i 1 Ar M j (Cff r 4.4AJ VAUEY -PP44TE*-5) -'�BEM IFOE R /1 - 4tq /oo mi 01 MI-M. U I Lb-r OAS S 'IF - 61J, T: tAST YAf-b=r Z%11, f1kVS0 SITE PL,gW;EXiSTIING) 40 SIN RE00 DRIVE South Burlington Realty Crpipany SOA R%.Mlyz ,Pon, Vemont FROM : WALSH ELECTRIC SUPPLY ) FAX NO. : 802 G55 5519 N )12 1998 03:26P11 P2 Type Catalog No. 7_CWSOIvt"PL-/ w)rh Ce�� PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS 0 APPLICATIONS U�Listed for Wei Location$ TLW Series TwiLighter Weliprism 28 watts to 70 watts High Pressure Sodium Metal Halide Compact Fluorescent Security. accent and perimeter lighting, plate for effective heat transfer. DCIuxC glazed Lighting over entrance ways and garage porcelain socket pulse rated for 4KV. Available doors. indoor parking garages. tunnels, with built-in pholocYrntrol overpasses and alleys. p OPTICS 0 CONSTRUCTION UV stabilized polycarbonate prismatic retractor Vandal resistant polycarbonate housing directs light into 00-600 zone Aluminum finished in architectural dark bronze Electrical rollGClor prOvidQ& 9MOOM "down-and-out" components mounted to die-cast mounting distribution. ORDERING INFORMATION Catalog No. Watts 11 Lamp Basc Volts weight Balleat Option _ HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM TLW35NLXL 35 E17 Medium 120 5 Ibs. Reactor (NPF) — TLW35NLXLPC 35 E1 7 Medlum 120 5 lbs Reactor (NPF) Photocontrol TLWSONLXL 50 E17 Medium 120 5 lbs Reactor (NPF) — TLW60NLXLPC 50 E17 Medium 120 5 lbs. Reactor (NPF) Photocortrol TLW70NLXL 70 E17 Medium 120 5 Ibs. Rractor (NPF) — TLW70NLXLPC 70 E17 Medium 120 5 Ibs. Reactor (NPF) Photocontrol METAL HALIDE TLW50NMAL SO ED17 Medium 120 7 bs. Reactor (NPF) — TLWbONMALPC 50 E017 Medium 120 7 Ibs Reactor (NPF) Photocontrol COMPACT FLUORESCENT TLW28NFL 28 PLC GX32d•3 120 5lbs — TLW28NFLPC 28 PLC GX32d-3 120 5lbs. — Photocontrol BALLAST. All units supplied with Reactor ballasts. For High Power Factor ballasts, change "N" In CaL No. to "H". O BALLAST Normal power factor reactor ballast for 120V input. Also available in high power factor. ElOeVieat components mounted to die-cast plate for effective heat transfer ❑ INSTALLATION Mounts directly to any recessed box for quick retrofriting. O LAMP HID units 3umlled with E/B17 or E017 medium base lamp Compact Fluorescent units supplied with 28 watt PLC lamp. MMNCO JU 2--6 FROM : 1,%SH ELECTRIC SUPPLY / FAX NO. : 902 655 5519 Nr,..,, 12 1998 03: 27PN P3 PHOTOMETRICS CATALOG, NO TLWSONLXL LAMP 5OW High Pressure Sodium LUMENS 4,000 MOUNTING HEIGHT. 5 it. M/IJ �L:affin)1mIV ago ■0'1I0..■M0I„■■ JOE MINE ME t . LEE SUGGESTED SPECIFICATIONS rMUre Shull be Consin)Ctod U vpndpl-rC;istant poNcarwale. finished in awk arChileetural bronze. Elaceical components shall be mounted to a die-cast mour" date for effective heat transfer. HID fixtures are equipped with deluxe glazec pptc4R4,n SWkgt5 pu169•rafyd for 4 KV Fixture Is equipped with tamper -resistant hardware CONVERSION TABLE for different heights 5' 1.78 9' 79 7' 1.31 10, 1 .64 8' 1.00 12' .44 CONVERSION TABLES tot different wattages Walls Multiplier 35W HPS .56 SOW HPS 1.00 70W HPS 1 42 50VV MA .89 28W PL .42 Lens shoe be conspUCicd or UV stabilized clear p❑smatic polycarowate. HID ludures equipped with Normal Power Factor Reactor ballast for 120 volt input Future also available in high power factor. HIO fixture4 Supplied with *ft%Qi 35, 50 a 70 watt lamp as specified Compact Fluorescent unit supplied with 28 wan PLC lamp. Fixturrts are fully gaskewed and UL Hated for wet lucstiurrs Fixture shall be wall mounted over a recessed splice box. Fixture also capable of aceeptirg a Ovilt•m pholocontrol for automatic dusk -to -dawn lighting Fixture :hall be StonCO Cat. No. tSm-ON). IN SUN= a GENLVTE Company 2345 VAUXHALL ROAD, PO SOX 129. UNION, NJ 07083-0129 OJenvery 1993 TEL: (908) 964-7000 9 FAX. (908) 964-1404 Cl 0 ChAFT 11/24/98 MOTION OF APPROVAL SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of South Burlington Realty to convert a 3200 square foot building from automobile repair and service to retail, 40 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a plan entitled, "Site Plan (Existing) 40 San Remo Drive South Burlington Realty Company South Burlington, Vermont," dated November 12, 1998, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the change in use will generate 4.02 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 3. The applicant shall post a $240 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 4. The plan shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to permit issuance. a) The site plan shall be revised to eliminated the two (2) parking spaces in front of the building and the area converted to lawn. b) The site plan shall be revised to note the type and size (must be a minimum of 2 %" caliper) of the proposed tree. 5. All new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as to not cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to installation. 6. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section;27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 7. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the use of the newly converted space.. 8. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. South Burlington Realty Company 366 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 (802) 863-9039 November 12, 1998 Mr. Raymond J. Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 40 San Remo Drive Dear Ray: Thank you for the preliminary comments dated November 3, 1998. Our response to the various items is as follows: - The floodlights at the rear will be removed. The lights on the rear and side, labelled "Ll" on the site plan, will be a "Stonco TLW Series TwiLighter Wallprism'', with a 50 watt metal halide lamp. A cut sheet is enclosed. - The CD4 / R4 boundary has been added to the plan. - The minimum landscaping budget of $240.00 will be met or exceeded by the addition of a tree in the front yard. I will try to have the specifications as soon as possible, but in any case I will assume that you would need to approve of the monetary aspects so long as the Planning Commission is happy with the basic nature and location of the tree. - The dumpster, if there is one, will be in the area indicated which we feel is adequately screened by a mixture of the building, vegetation, and fencing at the property line. If you and/or the Commission do not agree, then we will either provide a screening fence or eliminate the dumpster. Our preference, though, is to be able to place a small dumpster in the location indicated with no additional screening. - The previous tenant had five employees, and also used water for washing cars. The proposed tenant has only four employees and uses no process water. You may send the refund directly to me at 366 Dorset Street! - The square footage of retail floor area is 1,200 square feet. - We do not believe this change in use should result in a road impact fee, since there is no reliable measure which indicates an increase in traffic during the p.m. peak hour. If we use the I.T.E. generation rates for a 3,200 square foot auto care center, and compare that to a specialty type of retail, such as a building materials store or hardware store which includes a significant proportion of storage or non -retail floor area, it's hard to support that there is an increase. - We would prefer to keep the paved area in front since this makes a convenient place for one or two customers to pull up for a brief stop. If required, however, we would accept a site plan approval with the condition that the area be green except for a small area in front of the door. - The required building envelope has been added to the site plan. - We understand that Section 26.002 will apply. - We are seeking direction from the City Council regarding the design review issue, and Prime Real Estate — Commercial, Residential, Industrial Development Design, Build, Lease, Consulting Mr. Raymond J. Belair November 12, 1998 Page 2. expect to comply with their requirements. Thanks again for letting us know about these issues in a timely manner. If anything else is needed, please give a call. enclosure 7'a d''/wv�w� Z z_- A,q /q- COMPUTATION OF TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES PROJECT DATA: (1) "EFFECTIVE DATE"fir FOR TAX CREDITS: _ +� (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS _ vph (3) ESTIMATED PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From current tax C� assessment) a` • units (4) TOTAL FLOOR AREA AFTER *� CONSTRUCTION s.f. (5) TYPE OF USE ( 6 ) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IMPACT FEES: ( 7 ) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (From Form NR-2) $ (� COMPUTATION OF ROAD IMPACT FEES (lj BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE PER PEAK HOUR. VEHICLE TRIP END (2) ESTIMATED PEAR HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS From form NR-1) (3) (4) (5) (6) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE (1) x (2) PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (from line (3) of Form NR-1) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND / (From Table ST-9) $ �( CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND (4) x (5) (7) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-10) (8) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND (4) x (7) (9) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-11) $ (10) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (4) x (9) $ 226.00 / vte k vte units / unit $ i, 53 / unit / unit $ (11) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-12) $ �/ unit (12) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS (4) x (11) $ (13) POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 b, (From line (8) on Form NR-3) `•_ units (14) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND (From Table ST-13) $ / unit (15 CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND (13) X (14) (16) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-14) $ % ?j / unit (17) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND (13) x (16) $ /A (18) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-15) $ �d� / unit (19) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND r .' (13) x (18) $ (20) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-16) $ / unit (21) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS (13) x (20) ( 22 ) TOTAL ROAD -IMPACT -FEE - (3) - (6) - (8) - (10) - (12) - (19) (21) (15) (17) ° 1 ` 2;1A i? - _ ESTIMATION OF POST CONSTRUCTION VALUE TYPE OF USE ;From line (5; on form NR-1 (2) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (from line (6) on Form NR-1 (3) TOTAL FLOOR AREA (From line (4) on Form NR-1) (4) ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT (From Table ST-17) (5) ESTIMATED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS (3) x (4) (6) LAND VALUE (From current tax records) (7) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE (5) + (6) (8) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (7) / $1,000 s.f. units 4a s� �,� �� > ,,,,gib KrS k�� Fes, �� > �aoov PLANNING COMMISSION 11 February 1997 page 5 Members then considered the outstanding issues. There were no objections to the waiver on parking space width. Members suggested moving the green space back 18". Members had no problem with the added building height because of the elevator towers, but noted the structure must meet the additional setback requirement. Any decrease in that requirement would require a variance from the Zoning Board. Members suggested the Commission write to the Council with regard to the stop sign. Mr. Weith noted that the traffic study recommends two left turn lanes on Airport Drive. He felt the southbound one should be provided at a minimum. Mr. Beck felt that could be accomplished via striping of the pavement, and they are prepared to do it. The right turn lane is part of the plan. Mr. Beck felt the left turn lane onto Airport Road is not part of this project, but, he noted, it is part of the 10-year design plan. Members were OK on this. Mr. Weith asked if the applicant would be willing to dedicate a 7' strip along Airport Parkway for future widening. Mr. Ham- ilton said not as part of this approval, but they are always willing to talk with the city about it. Mr O'Rourke moved the Plann application of the City of sq. ft. addition to an exis building, 2) construct a mu vehicles, and 3) construct Parking areas, 1200 Airport of plans, page two entitled South Burlington, Vermont," dated 1/29/97, last revised stipulations: ing Commission approve the site plan Burlington to: 1) construct a 13,24.0 ting 72,625 sq. ft. airport terminal lti-level parking structure for 1143 new employee and long term _surface Drivel as depicted on a 25-page set_ "Burlington International Air op r_t.,_ prepared by Webster -Martin,_ Inc_,_ 2/3/97, with the following 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not super_-_ seded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. For the ouroose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlin ton Im act Fee Ordinance, thePlannin Commission estimates that the proposed termina_1 expansion and parking structure willgenerate zero additional vehicle tri ends duri the P.M. peak hour. 3. The PlanningCommissionapproves a sewer allocation of 1500 �� Sqd Rknw l/ti-� �/��rg �i� S� �� i��i�� i� X /S��t = l � � !`�� --� l ��. �.�,-� Xr5 5�� _ �`� 5``� PLANNING COMMISSION 11 February 1997 page 5 Members then considered the outstanding issues. There were no objections to the waiver on parking space width. Members suggested moving the green space back 18". Members had no problem with the added building height because of the elevator towers, but noted the structure must meet the additional setback requirement. Any decrease in that requirement would require a variance from the Zoning Board. Members suggested the Commission write to the Council with regard to the stop sign. Mr. Weith noted that the traffic study recommends two left turn lanes on Airport Drive. He felt the southbound one should be provided at a minimum. Mr. Beck felt that could be accomplished via striping of the pavement, and they are prepared to do it. The right turn lane is part of the plan. Mr. Beck felt the left turn lane onto Airport Road is not part of this project, but, he noted, it is part of the 10-year design plan. Members were OK on this. Mr. Weith asked if the applicant would be willing to dedicate a 7' strip along Airport Parkway for future widening. Mr. Ham- ilton said not as part of this approval, but they are always willing to talk with the city about it. Mr O'Rourke m application o sq. ft. addit building, 2) vehicles, and rkina areas South Burlin dated 1_/29 /97 stipulations: 1. All prev_io seded by this oved the Planning Commission approve the site plan f the City of Burlington to: 1) construct a 13,240 ion to an existing 72,625 sq. ft. airport terminal construct a multi -level parking structure for 1143_ 3) construct new employee and long term _surface 120.0__Airport Drive, as depicted on a 25-page set e two entitled "Burlington International Airport, ton Vermont," re ared _by Webster -Martin, Inc, , last revised 2/3/97, with the following pprov roval and stipulations which are not` 11 remain in effect. 2. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, thePlannin Commission estimates that the proposed terminal expansion and parking structure will generate zero additional vehicle trip ends Burin the P.M. peak hour. 3. The Planning Commission approves a sewer allocation of 1500 Preliminary Memo - Planning November 24, 1998 agenda items November 3, 1998 Page 2 SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY - AUTO REPAIR TO RETAIL - SITE PLAN the floodlights at the rear of the building should be either removed or replaced with a downcasting shielded fixture approved by the Director of Planning & Zoning. `f the plan should note that the easterly boundary is the boundary of the CD 4 District to the west and the R4 District to the east. the minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $240 which is not being met. the dumpster storage area should be screened. indicate number of employees for previous tenant (for sewer calculation). provide square footage of retail floor area (for parking calculation). the applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximately $750. staff recommends that the paved area in front of the building be removed and converted to lawn. show required building envelope. any alterations to this noncomplying building must comply with Section 26.002 of the zoning regulations regarding alterations to noncomplying structures. f the City has warned new design review criteria for this district. Applicant must therefore appear before the City Council as required by State statutes and this should happen before the plan is reviewed by the Planning Commission. HCA AIRPORT REALTY - ADDITION - SITE PLAN — plan should show the same number of parking spaces as was shown on the last approved plan. — all pole mounted and building mounted flood lights should be removed or replaced with downcasting shielded fixtures approved by the Director of Planning & Zoning. Staff recommends that the applicant submit an explanation why these floodlights are needed and why there are no other alternatives. Staff requests that the applicant submit a letter from the Airport and FAA which concurs with the applicant's position that floodlights are necessary. — applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximate $270. la interoffice MEMORANDUM NNW - To: Joe McLean From: Joe Weith, Director, Planning & Zoning Subject: 40 San Remo Drive Date: November 9, 1998 I mentioned to you a couple of weeks ago that the City Council had warned a public hearing to consider an amendment to the zoning regulations to establish a city center design review overlay district. Since the warning, the City received a site plan application to change the use of a property located at 40 San Remo Drive from automotive repair to general retail. The 40 San Remo Drive property is affected by the proposed design review overlay district. The proposed zoning requires a "change of use" to also obtain a design review approval. You had mentioned to me that under state statute, an application that is affected by a warned zoning amendment must obtain approval from the City Council. It appears that the 40 San Remo Drive application falls into this special review category. I am requesting that you prepare a written opinion that explains the proper procedure for going through this process and also the City Council's role in this process. I would like to give your opinion to the Council so that they will be better prepared when the applicant appears before them. Thank you for your immediate attention to this request. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802) 658-7955 November 3, 1998 John Jaeger South Burlington Realty Company 366 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Auto Repair to Retail, 40 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Jaeger: ZONING (802)658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer, William Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, November 13, 1998. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Since?ondJ aymBelair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJBimcp F.ncls Memorandum - City Engineer November 24, 1998 agenda items November 2, 1998 Page 2 SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY COMPANY - 40 SAN REMO DRIVE Site plan dated February 13, 1998 is accpetable. 4 1 MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: November 24, 1998 agenda items Date: November 3, 1998 1) Highlands Development Company, LLC Golf Course Road Acceptable 2) Homestead Design Golf Course Road Acceptable 3) Dorset Square Associates 150 Dorset Street Acceptable 4) South Burlington Realty 40 San Remo Drive Building needs to be reviewed for exit capacity 5) HCA Airport Realty 3060 Williston Road Acceptable 6) Alan & Maureen Pidgeon Berard Drive Acceptable Dated 10/8/98 Dated 10/13/98 Dated 10/16/98 Dated 10/19/98 Dated 10/6/98 Dated 10/21/98 Q 0 S 1N `BED _DPOE� c' Sow rt� E. FAv Eb L, N r ( ellP� --- -- / t 5A57-inlG 50 .sAna (CftAmPLAvi VALLEY I i j `1.r-` L.o%ItJiwG RECEIVED OCi 3 Q 1996 City of So. Burlington L bT 79rzt.A r j / i Covt-�•kGE- Bv0w6- �-I� sS F'��T a G AS ` , JCLx�„a 1`REEs /oo' SATE PEA W' (EXI ST I NG•) 40 5A W REPRO DRNE South Burlington Realty Cmpany SoO) Bvrl4i� ion, Verrnont CISITEFPLANT APPLIC'ATIONN hw*( A1456)lj 1) OWNER OF ItF('ORI) ( name, address, phone #) ` 2) APPLICANT (`name, address, phone 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, (name, �4� 00YSP—1 y(1 - address, phone #)—= t_ 'iA r,-7 li -" ? -_. 4) . PROJECT STREET ADDRESS:_ '-f ® �5�� d/ ►^ire. 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S)(-r4co�wqeL ouTo bt4k/ --�hz.D to 7) SIZE OF PROJECT" (i.e. total building square �f�dbtage, maximum hei`g�ht and t floors, square feet per floor) 8) NUMBER OF 9).LOT COVERAGE: building %; landscaped (illy OT areas' building, par ing, outside storage ,fi % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings : Ae , Landscaping S Other Site Improvements (please list W17 cost) t ' C k G 5 e-_ - 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: I 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out)e— Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon; ; 12-1p.m. `-) 1-2 p.m, I-2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m._'> ; 4-5 p.m.; 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: �-UC vV ` _ 94' S J. 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: DATE OF SUBMISSION S- NA R`E` OFP! ICA�� DATE OF HEARING IWO I a 11w --qE-M KCAO i FAV c V j 4 CXj5r-JA1CT- Eb(?.z 31 0 RENO DR— I C.Flf CD (CAAmpLA #A) VAUZY r SITE PLAN (EXISTING) 40'3AN,REDO DRIVE South —Rw-iwkjir;,,j Rc-afty scy'l btp �,'Pex '11, IvMCI,, No Text 5AM --�EFY)0 -DRNF -5 ri AJ G- 15U fir 6-0 OD NI LI' (0jAAjpLA4AJ VAUL-3 5 NOV 1 3 City of So. Burlipgtrrl 79 wE A CA6- 5 fA E o -7 0 Al /001 17 SITE PLA Hill (��I STING) 40 � A R\ E 0 0 L) R V E-- Sc)uth Burlington Realty O-Dmpany II South Bvilhigton, Vermont