Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP-82-0000 - Supplemental - 0024 San Remo Drive2. PLANNING COMMISSION TUN:: 6, :282 X r. Ewing seconded the motion. Er. Paul Graves, who leases the Econolodge property from the Lamploughs, had just arrived, and he asked to see the drainage plans. Mr. Kittle, the applicant's engineer, explained that instead of the sheet overland flow for the new parking lot, as previously planned, they now will have a series of catch -basins and will pipe the water to the existing outfall on the northwest corner of the lot. That outfall will be rebuilt with stone and rip -rap to stabilize it. Mr. Graves showed pictures of the outfall, which is badly eroded, and said he would like to see the design, so he would know that in 5 years the same thing would not happen. Mr. Mona asked whether the two parties had worked out an agreement and Mr. Roesler said they had not, although they had spent a lot of time trying to do so. The Inn will now have to spend an additional $15,000 for the drainage. He said they knew they had to maintain the outfall, which has not been done but now they will restore and maintain it. He said the 1964 easement agreement was on file in City Hall. Mr. Spitz said the city would have liked to have a new agreement between the property owners, but in the absence of that, they have drainage plans they feel will work. To assure that the work will be done, he said a bond was being required. He did not have an exact figure for the bond, but felt it would be roughly S15,000-320,000. Mr. Graves said the 1964 agreement said the Inn would maintain the outfall and that that had not been done. Mr. Roesler felt that that item had slipped through the cracks when the Inn management changed. IMr. Mona said the Commission had an outfall design the City Engineer felt would permit the applicant to meet the requirements of the 1964 agreement. Mr. Roesler said the Inn knew there was a problem with the outfall, and that they would fix and maintain it. They have a legal obligation, as well as an obligation to the Planning Commission, to do so. Mr. Graves wanted to see an engineering drawing of exactly what would be done to the outfall and Mr. Ewing agreed there were a lot of questions on the outfall design. Mr. Kittle_did,not knowwhatmore detail he, eeu.ld,give..,.w.. M ` r: Mona asked whether a no vote would throw out last meeting's approval. Mr. Spitz felt they would still have approval, but would need to reach agreement with Mr. Graves. He did not feel an adjacent property owner should have approval power over the application. Mr. Walsh said he would rather see more detail on the drainage plans, although he had no problems with the overall approval. He did not want a no vote to be construed as a vote against the entire project. Mr. Jacob said he was not an engineer, and more details on the outfall would make no sense to him. He felt the bond would insure that things were done properly. Mr. Kittle said the depth of stone would be 1 112' - 21. The motion carried with Messrs. Walsh and Ewing voting no. Site Flan application by Overhead Door Company for a 4160 sQ ft addition at 24 San Remo Drive Mr. Spitz said the application had been to the Zoning Board for a dimensional variance and that one stipulation had been that the existing green area be maintained and that there be no building in the rear 321. "r. Walt Adams said there were originally 2 buildings, and 3 years ago a third was proposed in the center, to make it look like it was all one. Now they would like to expand the center building and the one on the left, in order to balance the length of building on the right. Access is through a large overhead door. The area will be used for warehousing, since the owner 3 . PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 8, 1982 has added a line of windows to his overhead door line. Mr. Adams noted that the area in the rear was heavily treed, but that if any landscaping were added, it perhaps should be between this property and the Bouchard property. Mr. Spitz said the rear could not be used for anything. Mr. Adams said that if the cedar hedge were left as is, it would make a captive area in the back which would eliminate the possibility of access back there. Mr. Woolery wanted to be sure it was understood that that land was unusable and that there would be no requests later to use it. Mr. Levesque pointed out that the city park in the area had never been built. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Overhead Door Company for a 4160 sq. f t. addition as depicted on a plan entitled "Overhead Door Company, San Remo Drive," prepared by Adams Construction Company, Inc., last revised June 3, 1982, subject to the following stipulations: 1. Within the rear 32 feet of the property there shall be no new building, gravel area, or outside storage and the existing trees and natural buffer shall be maintained. 2. A $1,000 landscaping bond shall be provided. 3. This approval expires in 6 months. Mr. Levesque seconded the motion. Mr. Woolery noted that the landscaping bond was for two growing seasons. The motion carried unanimously. Final plat application by LTH Associates for development of 40 residential and 50 commercial acres on property owned by Bartlett on Shelburne Road Protect contains 120 units of multi -family housing and 37 individual house lots Mr. Spitz said that the notice which went to the newspaper and the abutters said this was preliminary, not final plat. He said that was a substantial mistake and that he did not feel approval should be given tonight. He felt the essential items should be reviewed tonight. A member of the audience said many abuttors were not here tonight because of the mistake. Mr. Walsh did not feel discussion should take place without the abuttors and Mr. Kieran added that he did not feel this was a legal discussion, since it did not have proper notification so all the abuttors could hear the full discussion. Mr. Spitz said the meeting had been warned and that only one word wns in error. fie felt the Commission could go through the information and a..k questions but he said they should be prepared to go through it all again later. Mr. Mona asked the earliest time this could be heard if the proper warning were sent out and was told it was July 13• Mr. Walsh moved that the hearing on the Bartlett property be continued until ;)roperly warned, and heard on July 13. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion. ;fir. Jacob asked how much of a burden this would put on the applicant. Mr. Larkin said it would be a large burden and that he would rather hear it tonight and take his chances on having to hear it all over again. Mr. Mona noted that if it were heard tonight, the Commission might find something it was not happy with and that could be resolved for the next hearing. There were 5 abuttors present. The motion failed with Mr. Walsh voting aye. No action will be taken tonight, Mr. Woolery said. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 6/4/82 2) Holiday Inn The drainage issue is being returned to the Planning Commission since the 2 property owners did not agree on a solution. The applicant has now prepared a revised plan that utilizes only the exist- ing drainage easement and that cleans up (at considerable expense) the existing erosion problem. The new drainage plan appears to satisfy all relevant City requirements. 3) Overhead Door The Zoning Board recently approved a variance to allow 36.2% lot coverage and a side setback of 13 feet. The Board also stipulated that within the rear 32 feet of the property there shall be no new building, gravel area , or outside storage and the existing trees and natural buffer shall be maintained. The addition, to be used for storage, will be behind the existing building and complies with the above requirements. A cedar hedge with a 3 foot spacing between trees will be planted around the entire gravel area behind the addition. No changes are planned for parking since no additional employees o� truck traffic are anticipated. 4) Bartlett Property The layout of the final application closely conforms to the approved preliminary plat. All required legal documents and engineering plans have been submitted according to schedule. However, because of the size of the project, complete review and preparation of stipulations may not be finished by Tuesday night. Specific comments are listed below: STREETS: The intersection of the new road at Shelburne Road must be revised to meet the 3% grade requirement. SIDEWALKS: A sidewalk has been shown on only one side of the commercial street, not kx)th sides as required at preliminary plat. Sidewalks on several of the residential street connections must also be added. The applicant is not proposing walkways in the private multi -family area, except from housing units to parking lots. This should be reviewed. WATER: See attached letter from Bob Gardner. If access to the Ireland develop- ment falls through, alternate connections must be designed to serve the upper areas. ESTIMATE SHEET PAGE NO. OF PAGES JOB NAME CONTRACTOR ESTIMATE NO. LOCATION ARCHITECT DATE ESTIMATOR CHECKED BY BID DATE JOB DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION • QUANTITY m ® MATERIAL LABOR SUBCONTRACT TOTAL (0 a 5�0 TOTAL COSTS MISC. JOB EXPENSES AMOUNT OVERHEAD PROFIT TOTAL FORM 237 Available from Zwas Inc.. Groton. Mass. 01450 BIDSUBMITTED OR TOTAL FORWARD DHS 6/8/82 MOTION OF APPROVAL For the Site Plan application of Overhead Door Company for a 4160 square foot addition as depicted on a plan entitled "Overhead Door Company, San Remo Drive," prepared by Adams Construction Company, Inc., last revised June 3, 1982: Stipulations: 1) Within the rear 32 feet of the property there shall be no new building, gravel area, or outside storage and the existing trees and natural buffer shall be maintained. 2) A $1000 landscaping bond shall be provided. 3) This approval expires in 6 months. Date Received By Date Application Completed and Received By CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVI&I 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE -NUMBER OF: (a) Owner of Record Donald Johnson 745 North Ave. Burlington, Vermont 864-9882 By (b) Applicant Wayne Johnson of Overhead Door Co of Burlington Inc 24 San Remo Drive So. Burlington Vermont 864- 8 5 (c) Contact Person Walter Adams Jr. of Adams Const. Co., Inc. 29 Intervale Rd. Burlington Vermont 864-0721 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: _24 San Remo Drive. So. Burlington Vermont 3) PROPOSED USE(S): Storaze 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e.,'# of units, floor area, etc.) 4160 sq ft 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) No Change 6) COST ESTIMATES: (a) Buildin61gs $33,500.00 (b) Landscaping $1,000.00 (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) $2,000.00 7) ESTIMATED PROTECT CaIPLETION DATE 1 September 1982 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) No Change 9) PEAK HOUR(S) OF OPERATION 7AM to 5PM 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Monday thru Friday G /2 2. C , DATE SI PLICANr