Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 1200 Airport Drive (10)PLANNING COMMISSION 11 February 1997 page 2 ruary 1997 re: February 11, 1997_Agenda Items. Mr. Beaudin sec- onded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Site plan application of the City of Burlington to 1) construct a 13,240 sq. ft. addition to an existing 72,625 sq. ft. airport terminal building, 2) construct a multi -level parking structure for 1108 vehicles, and 3) construct new employee and long term surface parking areas, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Hamilton said they have met with property owners along Airport Drive. The Airport is sensitive to the fact that they are located in a residential neighborhood and have a deep feeling for the neighbors. He said he felt the plan being proposed meets everyone's requirements. Mr. Beck, the architect for the plan, said they will rearrange traffic patterns. No gates or emplanements will be added to the Airport. The Airport has acquired the Park & Travel property which they will use for a long-term parking lot. The Airport entrance will be moved and traffic will be brought in to a 4-lane access road and a 2-lane by-pass road (for taxicabs, etc.). There is a service drive for truck traffic, and this is the area where dumpsters will be located. The plan is to have a pedestrian skywalk to link the second floor of the parking garage to the second floor of the terminal building. There will be a new area for rental cars. The FAA parking will be moved to the airport side of the building for direct access. Their current parking lot will be used for employees. It will be served by a one-way entrance from Airport Drive. This access will be signed and gated. Employees will exit the Airport with the rest of the Airport traffic. The long term lot will be entered from White Street Extension. Shuttle service will be provided to the terminal building. The landscaping plan has changed since the plans were made. Mr Beck showed the building setbacks which range from 90 ft. at one end to 115 ft. at the other. There will be significant plantings to soften the massiveness of the parking building. They will exceed the landscape formula. All lighting fixtures will be cut off fixtures and will be below the 3 candle maximum. This applies both in the lot and in the PLANNING COMMISSION 11 February 1997 page 3 parking structure. All poles will be either 15' or 20'. The 25' foot poles now existing will be removed. Mr. Beck then showed the plan for the parking structure, noting the access, stairwells, elevators, and the connection to the terminal. The garage will be operated by a ticketing system located at the north face of the building. Additions to the terminal building will include canopies along the curb side. The southern half of the building will be 2 stories, the northern half one story. The building will be glass with brick elements every 15 feet. Steel will be high- lighted with color. The addition will be 35 ft. high. Mr. Beck noted that the tops of the elevators will exceed the 35 ft. height limitation by just under 2 feet. They are 180 ft. back from the corner of the building. Many alternatives were considered, and they have decided to ask for the additional height in the elevator towers. Mr Beck said they tried to make the parking structure as small as possible and still meet peak demand. The plan shows 9 ft. wide parking stalls, but they would like to make them 8'9". This would serve both the function of the garage and enable them to generate more income. They would gain 35 parking spaces. They anticipate the garage will be full during peak demand. An aver- age stay of 3 days is anticipated. In considering the reduced width parking stalls, they looked at airport garages in other airports. At Logan, the stalls are 8'4" with 24 ft. aisles. The Rhode Island Convention Center has 8'6" stalls with 24 ft. aisles. Key Bank downtown has 8'6" stalls as does the Radison. The Cornerstone Building has a mix of 8'6", 8'9" and 9'. Smith Thompson has 81 wide spaces. The State office building on Cherry Street has 9' spaces. Airport people have met with neighbors twice to address traffic concerns. The traffic study says no signals are warranted. The neighbors have asked for a stop sign at White Street/Airport Dr. They have also asked for speed limit enforcement and limitations on parking along Airport Drive. Mr. Weith asked why access to the overflow parking is only one way. Mr Beck said that will be changed to 2-way. Mr. Dunn said they want to avoid having to have 2 ticket booths. Mr. Weith said that to eliminate or reduce parking on Airport Drive, residents would have to make their case to the City Council. A resident said that one of their concerns is that when there is snow on the street, people park further into the PLANNING COMMISSION 11 February 1997 page 4 road, and this is dangerous. Mr. Weith asked what landscaping will be removed. The landscape architect said all existing trees along Airport Drive will be kept. They will be cut back at intersections. They will also clear areas where snow might fall off rooftops. They will plant many species of trees for more interest. They will also add some trees along the north side. Ms. Deering said she could see no need for a special access for FAA employees especially since another access point only in- creases the potential for accidents. She also favored the 4-way stop sign at White St/Airport Dr. Mr. Beck said the curb cut is for entrance only. It will be signed and gated. FAA traffic will exit with the rest of Airport traffic. Mr. Foisey said he has a problem now trying to back out of his driveway. He has had 2 accidents in front of his house. He lives right across from the FAA entrance and feels there is too much traffic there and too many cars parked on the street. Mr. Beck said they feel the FAA entrance is needed to clean up the mix of traffic. He said employees are on a staggered shift throughout the day. Mr. Lemay questioned the 2-way traffic along the overflow parking and said that neighbors had been told it would be only one way. Mr. Beck said they have to have a way for people to move back and forth when looking for parking spaces. It is still one-way to get to the overflow parking area. Mr. Weith said the alternative would be to have traffic go back onto Airport Drive and make the whole loop again. Mr. Weith then asked why employees can't go in the White St. access. A resident said that neighbors have put up with a lot from Airport traffic. He said they want to work with the Airport, but issues have to be addressed. The biggest issue he saw is traffic getting in and out of the Airport. He did not oppose the building of the garage. Mr. Teeson felt the stop sign would be helpful. He also sug- gested moving parking back on Airport Drive about 50 feet from the Airport entrance. This would give added visibility. Mr. Weith said the Commission can make the 4-way stop a condition but they can only recommend the no parking zone to the Council. PLANNING COMMISSION 11 February 1997 page 5 Members then considered the outstanding issues. There were no objections to the waiver on parking space width. Members suggested moving the green space back 18". Members had no problem with the added building height because of the elevator towers, but noted the structure must meet the additional setback requirement. Any decrease in that requirement would require a variance from the Zoning Board. Members suggested the Commission write to the Council with regard to the stop sign. Mr. Weith noted that the traffic study recommends two left turn lanes on Airport Drive. He felt the southbound one should be provided at a minimum. Mr. Beck felt that could be accomplished via striping of the pavement, and they are prepared to do it. The right turn lane is part of the plan. Mr. Beck felt the left turn lane onto Airport Road is not part of this project, but, he noted, it is part of the 10-year design plan. Members were OK on this. Mr. Weith asked if the applicant would be willing to dedicate a 71 strip along Airport Parkway for future widening. Mr. Ham- ilton said not as part of this approval, but they are always willing to talk with the city about it. Mr O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission 22Erove the site 21an ap.2lication of the City of Burlingtonto: 1) construct a 13,240 sq. ft. addition to an existincT 72,62_5 sq. ft. air2ort terminal building,_ 2)__construct a multi -level parking structure for 1143 vehicles, and 3) construct new employee and long term_surface parking areas, 1200 AirporE Drive, -_as depicted on a 25-page set of plans, page two entitled "Burlington International Airport, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Webster -Martin, Inc, dated 1/29/97, last revised 2_/_3/97, with the followin2 stipulations: 1. All Drevious aDiDrovals and stipulations which -a-r-e not s_up_er- seded by this a22roval shall remain in effect. 2. For the purpose of calculatingroad impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee ordinance,_ the Planning Commission estimates that the proposed terminal expansion and parking structure will qenerate zero additional -ve-h-i-c-le _tr�ip ends durin the P.M. peak hour. 3. The Planning Commission approves a sewer allocation of 1500 PLANNING COMMISSION 11 February 1997 page 6 gpd. The applicant shall pay the per gallon feepriorto permit issuance. 4. The applicant shall post a $129,050 landscape _bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a qood chance of survivinq. 5. The plan shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require ap.2roval of the City Planner. Three copies of the a_p_p_r,ov2d revised plan shall be submitted to the City Planner orior to Dermit issuance. a. The siteplan shall be revised to indicatethat a portion of thelong term lot access road shall be for__2_-way_traffic. b. The site plan shall be revised to relocatethe parking structure so it meets the additional front setback required under Section 25.113(d) of the zoningregulations. C. The site planshall be revised to provide details of the street improvements.required in condition #9. d. The site Dlan shall be revised to show the exact foot- pri_nt_of- the new parking structure including thestairway towers. e. The plans shall be revised to correctly _show the elevations of theproposed 36'9" highparkingstructure. f. The site plan shall be revised to -incorporate the hydran locations requ_est_ed_by the_Fire.Department in their memo dated 2/7/97. g_._ The _s_i_te_ _p_lan shall be revised to note the clearance height _under_ the skyway bridge _(_mi_ni,mum required is 12 feet) h. The site _p_lan,,s-hall be revised to show the r.o.w. for White Street Extension: i. The site planshall be revised to indicate the slo the ramp within the_qar_aqe which shall not exceed 15% j_._ The _s_i_te_ plan shall be revised to show 8 '_9_" parking _sp_aces in the parkingstructure. k. The site _plan_shall be revised to show landscaping plan as oresented at the Planninq Commission meetinq of 2/11/97. 6. Pursuant to Section 25 .113(c) of- the zoning _re_q_ulati.Qns,, the PLANNING COMMISSION 11 February 1997 page 7 Planning Commission allows the-p_ro,pos,ed_parking structure to exceed the thirty-five foot heiqh:� limitation- by �1'9.-" The Com- mission has determined that the taller structure: a) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in whichthepro2erty is _lo,cated;, b) will not detract from theimportant scenic views from the adjacent public roadways and other _p_ublic, rights -of -way;_ and c) will meet the additional setbacks requiredby Section 25.113-(-d)- of the zoning _regulations. The designof the parking structure shall be in accordance with the elevations depicted on Sheets Al. 4 and Al. 5. _ Any significant change to these elevation drawings shallrequire Planning Com- mission_app.roval. 7. All new exterior lighting _shall consist of downcastigg 8. The bermingand landsc_a_p_i_nq _al.ong the long term _parking area shall be installed prior to use of this area as an interior par -king lot during constructionof, the garage, If this is not pos_s_i_ble, _some_ _sort of screening _(_i._e, fence) shall be installed on an interim basis. The type -and location of screeninq_shall_be app.roved _by,_the_ City _Planner prior to installation. 9. The applicant shall beresponsible for the followingstreet improvements: a) A northboundright-turn lane at the-AiUort entrance. b) A southbound left -turn lane at the -Airport entrance. These improvements shall be constructed prior to occ_u_pancy,of.the parking structure. 10. The app_licant shall submit a third floorplan for the parkigg structure _pr_io-r-to issuance of a zoning permit. 11. The drai,na,qe_ pi,2_e under the _prop_osed _parkinq structure shall be relocated outside of the structure if -possible. If not, the corrugated metal-pi,2_e should bereplacedwith plastic or ductile iro_n pipe._ 12. The existing 12_in_c_h C.M.P. under White Street Extension shall be checked for adequacy to carry the increased storm water runoff. The results of this investigation shallbe p_rovided to PLANNING COMMISSION 11 February 1997 page 8 the City_Engineer. If _a larger _pipe is _nee_ded,_ it _shall be in- stalled prior to _occupa_nc_y of the _parking structure. 13. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zonincr recrulations or this aD- roval is null and void, 14. The ap_p_licant shall obtain a Certificate of_OccupancY/Compli- ance from the Administrative Officer _prior to o_c_c_u,2ancy _of_ the terminal addition and parkingstructure. 15. Anv chanqe to the site plan shall recruire aDDroval bv the South Burlington Planninq_Commission. Mr. Dinklaq_e_s_econded the motion. Mr. Hamilton asked if there could be consideration given to not having to put up a bond for landscaping. He asked if a letter of agreement would serve as well. After a brief discussion, members agreed to reword Condition #4 as follows: 4. The _app_l_i_ca_nt shall -po-st. -a _$_129_,_05_0_ lands -cape bond or other suretv orior to issuance of a zonina Dermit. The bond or other sure In the vote that followed,the motion as amended waspassed unanimously.. 5. Sketch plan application of P.S.H., Inc., to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 39,300 sq. ft. general office building (Building A), a 124 unit congregate housing facility, and a 79 unit extended stay hotel. The amend- ment consists of 1) resubdividing lots #3 and 4, 2) reducing the size of the general office building from 39,300 sq. ft. to 24,480 sq. ft., 3) constructing a 60 unit congregate housing facility, and 4) subdividing lot #4 into two lots of 5.42 acres and 0.7 acres, 421 Dorset Street: Mr. Giebink explained that The Pines is full and there is a long waiting list. They have been to the Zoning Board and gotten a conditional use permit and a height variance. Mr. Giebink showed lot #3 of the PUD. They propose to divide that lot and have the back part of it fold into the PUD. This will put The Pines all on one lot. Mr. Dinklage reminded the applicant that for planning purposes N WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS* ECONOMISTS* PLANNERS 135 COLLEGE STREET e P.O. BOX 9412 9 NEW HAVEN, CT 06534-0412 9 (203) 865-2191 e FAX (203) 624-0484 December 24, 1998 Mr. Joe Weith City Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Weith: Enclosed please find the minutes of the October 27, 1998 Steering Committee meeting for the BIA Alternative Parking Study. We are currently preparing the Evaluation Matrix for parking alternatives, and will advise Steering Comi-nittee members of the date for the next meeting shortly. Best wishes for the New Year. Sincerely, WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES , fA4,4"d -w-Lo'� 1(�f - J. Michael Wilson, P.E. Senior Associate JMW/adj ACCRA, GHANA - ALBANY, NY - ANAHEIM, CA - ATLANTA, GA - BALTIMORE, MID -BANGKOK, THAILAND - CARACAS, VENEZUELA -CHARLESTON, SC COLUMBIA, SC - COLUMBUS, OH - DES MOINES, IA - FALLS CHURCH, VA - HONG KONG - HOUSTON, TX - KUWAIT - KNOXVILLE, TN LEXINGTON, KY - LONDON, ENGLAND - MILWAUKEE, WI - NEW HAVEN, CT - ORLANDO, FL - PITTSBURGH, PA - RALEIGH, NC RICHMOND, VA - ROSELLE, IL - SAN FRANCISCO, CA - SAN JOSE, CA - TALLAHASSEE, FL - TAMPA, FL - TORONTO, CANADA - WASHINGTON, DC EMPLOYEE -OWNED COMPANY In Attendance: Notes of Meeting Burlington International Airport Parking Alternatives Study Steering Committee Meeting October 27, 1998 Peter Keating Transportation Planner, CCMPO J. J. Hamilton Airport Manager, BIA R.A. McEwing Airport Engineer, BIA Jason Owen VAOT Joe Weith City Planner, South Burlington Dan Bradley DPW, Burlington Mike Wilson WSA The purpose of the meeting was to present Technical Report No. 1, which had been distributed to committee members in advance, and discuss progress of the project in general. Peter Keating introduced Mike Wilson to present the report. Mike stated that he had three items for discussion: Presentation of the report; Feedback; and, Next steps in the study. Technical Report No. I consisted of two main parts: a report on the passenger surveys, and the comparison with peer group airports. These were presented in sequence. Passenger Surveys Surveys of departing passengers and employees were taken over the three-day period from Augmst 6-8, 1998. The su_-;ey questionnai-re-s h-Rd been reviewed and agreed by CCMPO and BIA. A total of 595 passenger and 105 employee responses were obtained. The responses to individual questions and their significance were presented and illustrated with graphics. Comments and questions pertaining to the surveys were: 1. A question about the 40 percent of departing passengers that originate in Burlington. A previous survey taken by the airport had found only 17 percent originating there. 2. A question about the proportion of passengers being dropped off and whether the vehicles proceeded to park after dropping passengers off. 3. A request for a more detailed breakdown of information about destinations. It was noted that a survey taken in February revealed that 63 percent of passengers were destined for Florida. Page 2 4. A request for a more detailed breakdown of parking duration. BIA remarked that the majority of parking revenue is derived in the first three hours of parking. 5. A question about Table 3 - the reason for the high proportion of "Other on Demand" ground access at the Savannah GA airport. 6. A question about how much the survey cost and whether the data base for the survey could be shared with BIA. BIA conducts surveys from time to time and would like to retain this information. WSA replied that the budgeted cost for the surveys was approximately $1,500 in out-of-pocket costs for direct field labor, travel and reproduction of the survey forms. This did not include WSA staff time for survey preparation and analysis of the results. If BIA were to undertake another survey, these costs would vary according to the scope of the survey and compensation of BIA personnel. Mike indicated that a copy of the survey data base would be provided to BIA at CCWO's request. 7. BIA remarked that, according to information from previous surveys: The distribution of passengers at BIA is approximately 60 percent business and 40 percent leisure; Fifty-five percent of enplanements are due to deplanements (i.e., are passengers returning to their origins outside Burlington); and, There are more than 250 employees at the airport. Mike indicated in response to CCNIPO that all of the requested information and clarifications would be provided. Some of them will have implications for parking demand, which will be taken into consideration. Comparison with Peer Group Airports Mike surnmarized the investigation of peer group airports and explained the comparison, which was given in Tables 6 and 7 of Technical Report No. 1. Comments on this matter included: It was noted that enplanements were based on 1996 data, the latest information available on a consistent basis, from the FAA website. BIA staff noted that enplanernents at BIA had increased significantly since then (to 440,000 anticipated in 1998). In response to a question, BIA indicated that enplanement data is not kept on a daily basis, but reported by individual airlines monthly and summarized by BIA. BIA offered clarifications of the parking rate schedule and the "Valet" parking service as operated at the airport. It was noted that Manchester Airport is building more parking. Page 3 Feedback WSA asked for further feedback on Technical Report No. I beyond individual questions raised previously. Feedback offered included: BIA indicated that they believed enplanement forecasts (of three percent or more annually) in the two consultant studies cited in TR No. I were too high, and that they anticipated annual growth in enplanements of approximately 2 percent for the next several years; A concern was raised by the Town of South Burlington about the amount of drop-off traffic at the airport and interest was expressed in ways to reduce this traffic; Discussion of potential approaches to alternative parking/access strategies. Comments related to this matter included: A fare -free bus, service to the airport had been tried in the past and was not considered a success; mass transit should be considered in a broader context, The feasibility of a van shuttle service was considered to be related to the type of people traveling, with business passengers the most likely candidates; The feasibility of a satellite parking lot was considered to be related to several factors - free or cheap parking, a facility that was actively managed and supervised, and presence of an enclosed and heated area for passengers awaiting the shuttle to the airport. A potential location for a sateflite lot would be at 1-89 Exit 14, near the existing Sheraton Hotel (post -meeting note: M. Wilson and Peter Keating discussed several potential locations for satellite lots after the meeting). Next Steps A Wilson and Peter Keating summarized by saying that afl comments would be taken into consideration and requested information would be provided. The next stage of work on the study would be preparation of an evaluation matrix of the alternative parking/access strategies. city of swo ftru4san sm 000%W STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING 802) 658- 7955 December 18, 1998 Mark Hamelin Dunn Hamelin Kane 156 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Landscaping Modification, Burlington International Airport Dear Mr. Hamelin: ZCNING ,802) 658-795.8 E'nclosed is a copy of the November 10, 1998 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval. Ifyou have any questions, please give me a call. 4 Sin erel er" I Weith, Director P�Pa1.1 ning & Zoning JW/mcp I Encl PLANNING COMMISSION 10 NOVEMBER 1998 Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Site plan application of Jeffrey Peck to amend a previously approved plan for a 4800 sq. ft. office/warehouse building. The amendment consists of constructing a 14' x 120' open attached accessory structure, 4090 Williston Rd./ 12 Palmer Court: Mr Duchesneau said they have a shortfall of 2 parking spaces. There is room for them in one location. Mr. Welth said that would add to front yard coverage problems along Palmer Court. Mr. Weith also noted a lot of material is stored in a few of the parking spaces and asked what would happen to this. Mr. Duchesneau said this relates to one job which should be cleared out soon. He thought that was part of the reason for the additional shed. Mr. Weith suggested a condition that there be no outside storage. Mr. Burgess added that the C/O should also be held up until the situation is fixed. Mr. Weith asked about stabilization of the bank. Mr. Duchesneau said that is part of this application. The plan is complete. Mr. Burgess felt this should also be a condition for the C/O. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve he site plan application of Jeffrgy Peck to amend a previously approved plan for a 4800 sq. ft. office/warehouse building. The amendment consists of constructing a 14' x 120' open attached accesso[y structure, 4090 Williston Road/12 Palmer Court, as depicted on a two page set of plans, page one entitled "Peck Electric Site Plan Palmer Heights, South Burlington, VT." prepared by Champlain Consulting Engineers. dated 10/23/98, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shafl remain in effect. 2. For the puipose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance. the Planning Commission estimates that the expansion will generate 1.24 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 3. The applicant shall Rost a $90 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit: The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 4. The plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require 4pproval of the Director o Planning & Zoning. Three copies of the gpl2roved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director o Planning & Zoning prior to permit issuance. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION 10 NOVEMBER 1998 5. Site Plan Application of Burlington International Airport to amend a previously approved plan to construct a 13,240 sq. ft. addition to an existing 72,625 sq. ft. airport terminal building, 2) construct a multi -level parking structure for 1143 vehicles, and 3) construct new employee and long term surface parking areas. The amendment consists of modif�ring the approved landscaping plan by reducing the amount of new landscaping, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Hamlin said there was a discrepancy as to what got spent, and they are asking for credit for saving existing trees. Mr. Burgess noted that the plan approved by the Corninission already showed the existing trees being saved. Mr. Hamlin then showed what went in. Trees were shifted 25 ft. from the parking garage so they could get a vehicle in to clears now falling from the roof. They also added larger trees and substantial perennial plantings at the Airport entrance. They were supposed to have $129,000 with $22,000 left from other projects. $122,000 was put in. They are asking for credit for $24,000 for what was saved. Mr. Weith noted that what was put in exceeds the minimum but is not as much as they got an approval for. Mr. Hamlin said they relocated some trees that were to be destroyed along Airport Drive and did this as a gift to the city. Mr. Weith noted that the airport has not lived up to the requirement to post a 3-year bond. Members were OK with approving the credit but wanted the bond posted. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Burlington International AiEport to amend a previously approved plan to construct a 13,240 sg. ft. addition to an existin 72,625 sg. ft. ai1port terminal building, 2) construct a multi level parking structure for 1143 vehicles, and 3) construct new employee and long term surface parking areas. The amendment consists of modiWng the approved landscgpe plan by reducing the amount of new landgcgin& 1200 AiKRort Drive, as dMicted on a 3 -page set of plans, Rage one entitled "Burlington international Airport South Burlington, Vermont, As Built Tree and Shrub Planting Plan," prepared by Du Associates, dated 10/ 16/97, last revised 9/2/98, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this Approval shall remain in effect. 2. The applicant shall post a $129,050 landscape bond within 30 dgys of this approval or prior to obtaining the Rermanent Certificate ofOccupangy/Coml2liance, whichever occurs first. The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 3 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802) 658-7955 December 11, 1998 Mark Hamelin Dunn Hamelin Kane 156 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Landscaping Modification, Burlington International Airport Dear Mr. Hamelin: ZONING (802) 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on November 10, 1998 (effective 12/8/98). Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Director of Planning and Zoning Jw/mcp I Encl City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802) 658-7955 November 6, 1998 Mark Hamelin Dunn Hamelin Kane 156 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Landscaping Modification, Burlington International Airport Dear Mr. Hamelin: ZONING (802) 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, November 10, 1998 at 730 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Director of Planning & Zoning JW/mcp Encls CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Planning Commission. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) C-17->� 42E 250-04-1&,:-�,'7222V I 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) A4,� -,/ AmE4�111 5;r—,V-10,or 0— 0:5401 O&Z - 01P41 6 96�; - Z.4-f 0 &-X-) 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: a / yr- t5o. 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above) -. 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed % 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ b) Landscaping: $ K-5,5�6 A7-r,'q-ehA9 4,i!Fr-7-2-Foe-� c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour (in and out): 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (111" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. 124��4 ziwze Z,2� A- R-OWZX-26 /.",- /--1/ SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT a SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: f REVIEW AUTHORITY: City Planner D-� Planning Commission I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Ej,-�Completp Incomplete Planner or Designee (Apfrmsp) k/1V ��j EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Planning Commission. Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) Survey data (distance and acreage) Contours (existing and finished) Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways Zoning boundaries Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) Location of septic tanks (if applicable) Location of any easements Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard North arrow Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date Exterior lighting details (must be down casting and shielded) Dumpster locations (dumpsters, must be screened) Bicycle rack as required underSection 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE [J New Application $ 60.00* [3 Amendment $ 35.00* * Includes $10.00 recording fee (Apfrmsp) VRI�6FT Motion of Approval Burliny-ton International AiEport 11/10/98 I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Burlington International Airport to amend a previously approved plan to construct a 13, 240 square foot addition to an existing 72,625 square foot airport terminal building, 2) construct a multi -level parking structure for 1143 vehicles, and 3) construct new employee and long term surface parking areas. The amendment consists of modifying the approved landscape plan by reducing the amount of new landscaping, 1200 Airport Drive, as depicted on a three (3) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "Burlington International Airport South Burlington Vermont As Built Tree and Shrub Planting Plan", prepared by Dunn Associates, dated 10/16/97, last revised 9/2/98, with the following stipulations: All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The applicant shall post a $129,050 landscape bond within 30 days of this approval or prior to obtaining the permanent Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance, whichever occurs first. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. Memorandum - Planning November 10, 1998 agenda items November 6, 1998 addition should be submitted with the preliminary plat submittal. Sewer: The preliminary plat submittal should include the sewer allocation request. There is no reserve capacity currently available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The approved allocation will be placed on a waiting list until such time as allocation is available. Traffic: The preliminary plat submittal should include a traffic impact study. Dumpster: All dumpster storage areas should be screened. Lighting: The preliminary plat submittal should include details (cut -sheets) for all existing and proposed exterior lights. Locations of all exterior lights should be shown on the plan. Lot merger: A lot merger agreement, approved by the City Attorney, should be recorded prior to recording the final plat plans which merges lots A, B and the recently acquired lot #I I from Allson Partnership. 5) BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - LANDSCAPING MODIFICATION - SITE PLAN This project consists of amending a plan approved on 2/11/97 (minutes enclosed) to construct a 13,240 square foot addition to an existing 72,625 square foot airport terminal building, 2) construct a multi -level parking structure for 1143 vehicles, and 3) construct new employee and long term surface parking areas. The amendment consists of modifying the approved landscape plan by reducing the amount of new landscaping. Landscapin& The minimum landscaping requirement for this project was $129,050. This requirement includes the shortfall on four (4) previously approved projects. The landscaping plan approved on 2/11/97 met this minimum requirement Staff inspected the landscaping prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and discovered that the landscaping planted was different and included less plant material than that shown on the approved plan. A temporary C.O. was issued pending the outcome of this request. The planted landscaping may meet the minimum dollar requirement, however, it is substantially less than what was proposed on the approved plan. The applicant submitted a summary of their 3 Memorandum - Planning November 10, 1998 agenda items November 6, 1998 landscaping expenditures (see enclosed). This statement indicates that they spent $208,682 which includes credits for stone walls, sidewalks and moving and saving existing trees. They are seeking credits for $30,077 worth of trees saved or transplanted. The landscaping bond for this landscaping expired some time ago and staff has been unable to obtain another one. The approval required that the bond remain in effect for three (3) years. The applicant is in violation of this requirement. Staff recommends approval of the revised plan. A condition should be attached that requires posting of a landscaping bond prior to issuance of a permanent C.O. permit. 6) JEFFREY PECK - ADDITION - SITE PLAN This project consists of amending a previously approved plan for a 4800 square foot office/warehouse building. The amendment consists of constructing a 14' x 120' open attached accessory structure. This property was last reviewed by the Commission on 1/12/93 (minutes enclosed). The ZBA on 6/10/96 granted the applicant approval to fill an area behind the building along Muddy Brook. This property located at 4090 Williston Road/12 Palmer Court lies within the Mixed Industrial and Commercial District. It is bounded on the north by a mixed use building used for auto repair and paving contractor's yard, on the east by Muddy Brook, on the south by Williston Road and on the west by Palmer Court. Access/circulation: Access is via a 48 foot curb cut on Palmer Court. No changes proposed to the access. Circulation is adequate. Parking: A total of 13 parking spaces are required and I I spaces including one (1) handicapped space and a bike rack are provided. This represents a two (2) space or 15.4% shortfall. Applicant should be prepared to justify this shortfall. Landscapim-, The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $90 which is being met. Proposed landscaping consists of a cedar hedge. 4 6 PHASE ONE PLANT LIST - (TREES AND SHR TREE KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAMES QTY. 51ZE REMARKS A.C. Ameloxhier cwiadenve DownV Shadblaw 13 2 2 1/2* Cal. 545. 5ir4e Stem. Heavy J A.P. Aew p4starwodn Norai" Maple 21 3 3 1/2' Cal. 545. Matched. &' Brariching Ht. (Min.) B.P. Betuls p"rifers White &rch 8 2 2 1/2' Col. 15415. 5ingie Stem. Pull F.P. Fro~ per"iyattics 'Sumwt' 5v"t Ash 11 2 1/2 - 3* Cal. 545, Matched. L' Branching Ht, P.G.-SI picirs 41swics White Spruce Is a - 10, 545. Full P.G.-82 plan glued WIvte Spruce 21 - a, BIB. Full P.G.-Us pices flows White Spruce 1b, 565. Full P.5.-Xi Pme strobus White Pina, 2 8 - 10, SIB. Full 60 P.S.-02 Pirvus strob" Whrte Pint 4 1. - a, 1545. FUN '2 IAI P-S--83 Pwas strobus Wtute Pint 1 5 - 61 Bills. FUN 7 '-ri2 - 5-R. Slrwqs recticulato J@Wew Tree Lilac 13 2 - 2 1/2* Cal. 615. Heavy. Symmetrical head e /)p C 5�- S.V. Sgrings, vulWis Common Lilac - Purple 5 8 - 01 BIB, 3 Tronk* /Ea. -- -1-0 T.O. Thujs occidentahs White Cedar 100 -4 - 5' Field collected. Plant 18' O.C. '5 SHRUB R.R. R048 rug*" Rugo" Raw 25 IS 24" C.G., Plant 3V O.C. V.D. Viburnum dontstue Arroswood Viburrium 148 3 41 C,G., Full, Plant 36' O.C. V.T. Viburnum trilobum American Cranberry Bush 43 3 4' C.G., Full. Plant 46' O.C. C F. A. A, PARKING 7 (D 0 .0 322 STO cc; 60 W z F- PHASE TWO PLANT LIST - TREES AND SHRUBS TREE &EY BOTANICAL NAME A.C. A morlanchwor canad"s A.H. AewuWs hippocsiotanwO A.P. Acer platarooldwe B.P. Betula p"rrfera C.T. catalpa specooss F.P. Froxinus pennallivanics 'Summot' G.B. ronkV bdoba 'Autumn GoW P.G.-Ul Pices QWWa P.G.-82 pices glsws P.G.-83 P"s 411sucs P.N.-Ul Pinus nogra PX-82 Porous nogre P.N.-83 Ponus nogre P.S.-XI Porous strobus P.S.-x2 Porous strobus P.5.-83 Porous strobus R.P. Robonia Pmwdo&cacw 5.R. 59ringa recticulat.8 S.V. 59rings vulworts T.C. Tilis cordats 'Gro"spirs' 5HRUB C.A. Cotoneaster spiculsta R.C. Rhododendron c*tswbmrnm 'Baste do Nelaw, R.R. Raw ru" S.P. Sprees prurvIolis 'Plans' V.0. Viburnum opulus 'Compoillontim' V.T. Viburnum trilobum OMMON NAME5 Do" Shadblow Common Horsachestnut Noriseq M*e White birch Northern Catalpa Summit Ash Maidenhair Tree Wlvto Swuce White Spruce White Spruce Avetriam Ports Austrian Pww Austrian Pww White Pww White Pone White Pons Black Locust Japanese Tree Ldec Common Lilac - Purple Greonswe London Crw*wrg Cotonse" Catawba Rhododendron Rugold Rom Bridelvireath Spores Compea European Cranbwrg American Cranberrg Bush t QTY. 51ZE 21 2 - 2 1/2* Col. 3 2 1/2 - 3' Cal. 10 3 - 3 1/ 2' CaL 21 2 - 2 1/2a Cal. 2 2 1/2 - 3" Cal. Is 2 1/2 - 3' Cal. 3 2 1/2 - 3' Cal. 3111 0 - 10, -42 16 - a, H ta 1 14 10' 13 .4 11 10, 1 2 1/2 3" Cal. 34 2 - 2 1/ 2' Cal. 64 5 - c 22 2 1/2-3' Cal. 62 16 24' & 3 3 4' 111 18 24' 110 2 3' to A. 2,4 3 0" so 3 + REMARK5 518. Single Stem. Heavg __­(2�j�v- a 30�`IIL BIB. FUR qg�; �� 545. Matched. C Branching Ht. _C, (Mon.) 7%_ 15115. sffvw Sum. Full 15115. Full SIB. Matched, 6' Branching Ht. (Mon.)-- 545. Full see. Full 15115. Full BIB. Full BIB. Full e 60 545. Full &V BIB, Full CIO BIB. Full k 15415. F L41 /Z C4? BIB. ICU" BIB. Full BIB. Hwavll. 59mmetrical heed INI qD 06 - 5415. 3 Trunks /Ea. ; V 5415. C Branching Ht (Min.) C, C.G.. run. plant 311, O.C. BIB. White. Plant 42" O.C. OC, C> C.G.. Plant 36' O.C. C.G.. Full. Plant 36- O.C. Zz C.G.. Full, Plant 34' O.C. C.G.. Full. Plant 48' O.C. -0.-;, L9 LANDSCAPE EXPENDITURES BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT October 2, 1998 Phase I - Trees and Shrubs Phase 11 - Trees and Shrubs Phase 11 - Additional Street Trees (22 Linden, 3 Ash) Perennials and Special bed prep. Subtotal: Trees, shrubs, perennials Landscape stone wall at entry Relocation of granite airport sign Landscape berming, grading, seeding Existing trees saved* (69 coniferous trees, 34 deciduous trees) Large trees transplanted (19 decidous trees, 4, coniferous trees) Curvilinear sidewalk Total Landscape Expenditures and landscape credits ECI Expenditure 35,849.00 78,762.00 7,795.00 15,319.00 137,725.00 5,940.00 1,800.00 24,640.00 24,400.00 5,677.00 8,500.00 208,682.00 *NOTE: To determine a conservative estimate for the value of trees saved and relocated, an installed unit cost for 2 V2" — 3" caliper trees was used. This unit cost ranged from $214.20 for a coniferous tree to $283.36 for a deciduous tree. These unit costs are extremely conservative considering the installation costs for a 12" caliper tree can range between 6,000 to 12,000 dollars. Many of the trees we saved are much larger than this. LANDSCAPF, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING October 2, 1998 Mr. Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 South Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Burlington International Airport Expansion and Parking Structure - Burlington, Vermont Minimum Landscaping Requirement Dear Mr. Ward: In response to your letter to Mr. Hamilton dated August 12, 1998 we would like to clarify the total cost of landscape expenditures for the airport project. As project designers we feel we have met the intent of the ordinance and would like to ask credit for the following items based on your ordinance which states that "...the Planning Commission may grant some credit for existing trees or site improvements other than tree planting as long as the objectives of this section are not reduced." During the site analysis phase of the project we identified a large number of mature trees, which if property preserved, would provide landscape character and enhance the value of the project for the City and neighboring land owners. Great effort was expended in the design of the roads, placement of the structure and grading of the earthworks to achieve this goal. In fact the layout of the entire project was based upon saving these trees. In addition, twenty-two large trees of exceptional quality that could not be saved by the proposed construction were transplanted to locations along Airport Drive. These trees extend from the airport entry to Williston Road and have added significant value to the landscape character along Airport Drive. Another key design element of the landscape plan are the large perennial beds. These plantings will provide an incredible display of both seasonal color and winter texture. These plantings and their special planting bed requirements represent a significant portion of the landscape budget. Additional landscape design elements that add value to the project and should be considered for credit include: 850 linear feet of curvilinear sidewalk on the northeastern side of Airport Drive where no walk existed. The decorative stone wall which raises the entry sign and creates a sense of entry for the project and The aesthetic shaping of the landscape berms to create visual character and help screen the structure from adjoining properties. 1'16 COLLEGE STREET, BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05,101 V 0 1 C E (802) 8G2-0098 F A X ( 8 0 2 ) 8 6 5 - 2 4 4 0 270 GREENWicii AVENUE, GREEN%ICH, CONNECTICUT 06830 V 0 1 C E ( 2 0 3 ) 8 6 3 - 9 0 7 9 F � x ( 2 0 3 ) 6 6 1 - 0 5 14 Richard Ward October 2, 1998 Page 2 I have included an itemized list of the landscape expenses incurred by the contractor as well as a conservative estimate for the trees we saved and transplanted for your review. This total equals 208,682 dollars which we believe well exceeds the required landscape formula of 129,050 and the additional amount of 22,322 which was rolled over from the Pratt & Whitney/Aviation requirement. (Total requirement - $151,372) Current as -built drawings are also included as I believe the drawing you received was our punch list of items that the contractor still has to address. It is our belief that we have met the intent of the ordinance and are pleased with the outcome of the project. We would appreciate the opportunity to discuss this issue with you at your convenience. Sincerely, Mark P. Hamelin Enclosure Cc: Jesse Beck, FFF J.J. Hamilton, BIA Bob McEwing, BIA Bob Mildrum, ECI City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802) 658-7955 1 October 2 7, 1998 Mark Hamelin Dunn. Hamelin. Katie 156 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Landscaping Modification, Burlington International Airport Dear Mr. Hamelin: ZONING (802) 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referencedprojectfrom City Engineer, William Szymanski, the Fire Department and mysetf Please respond to these comments with additional information andlor revisedplans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, October 30, 1998. Ifyou have any questions, please give me a call. Since!r7�y, RaymondJ Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJBImcp Preliminary Memo - Planning November 10, 1998 agenda items October 26, 1998 Page 2 the plan should be revised to widen the green strip along the property's frontage to 15' as required under Section 25.107 of the zoning regulations and as shown on the previously approved plan.. JACQUELINE MARCEAU - 5 LOT SUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLA N — provide acreage of "restricted areas" and "development areas" as shown on the SEQ zoning map. — show limits of Dorset Park View Protection Zone. — proposed lots exceed the width to length ratio of 1: 5 provided in Section 402 of the subdivision regulations. Staff does not support waiving this provision. — lots #14 and the reserved lot will be served by the proposed 60 foot no.w. Section 40 1. 10) (1)(a) of the subdivision regulations requires that a road way serving four (4) or more separate residential lots be publicly owned and built to City standards. Since this property abuts a reserved r.o.w. to Butler Farms, several lots could be served from this r.o.w. and one (1) or two (2) lots served by the r.o.w. off Hinesburg Road thereby eliminating the need for a public r.o.w. — the preliminary plat plan should include delineated wetland information including the associated 50 foot C.O. District/wetland buffer. — the Planning Commission will need to discuss the best location for Old Cross Road extension, and whether or ot a r.o.w. should be reserved connecting Butler Farms with Old Cross Road extension. BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - LANDSCAPING MODIFICATION - SITE PLAN — plans submitted are acceptable. JEFFREY PECK - ADDITION - SITE PLAN revised plans addressing comments in September 25, 1998 memo shall be submitted. 2 MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: �November 10, 1998 Agenda Items Date: October 2, 1998 VERMONT CUSTOM SHEET METAL - ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE 1. Access drive to new building may be 12 feet in paved width with a 18'wide gravel base. The paving is recommended at least one year after the gravel base in constructed. 2. Fire lane access around building may be gravel, 10 feet in width and 12 inches thick. 3. If the dumpster is placed near the westerly comer it will be easier to service. 4. Sewer service shall include clean outs. PECK ELECTRIC - PALMER HEIGHTS A large volume of fill has been placed in the area of the proposed addition. This fill is eroding with no visible protection from silt entering Muddy Brook. There is no silt -fence of any kind. A plan for the filling and stabilization of this fill should be submitted. This plan should be done by a licensed Engineer. It shall include contours and tree removal, location of brook and trees to be removed. BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - 1200 AIRPORT DRIVE The plan prepared by Dunn Associates dated September 2, 1998 is acceptable. MARCEAU SUBDIVISION- HINESBURG ROAD 1. City regulations regarding lot dimension should be applied to this development. The layout is a waste of land and would be difficult to develop in the future. 1 I I MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: , South Burlington Fire Department Re: November 10, 1998 agenda items Date: October 9, 1998 1) Jeffrey Peck Dated 8/28/98 12 Palmer Court Acceptable 2) Burlington International Airport Dated 9/30/98 1200 Airport Drive Acceptable 3) Robert Shand Dated 9/24/98 5 Ethan Allen Drive Acceptable 4) Edward & Jacqueline Marceau Dated 10/2/98 1545 Hinesburg Road Hydrants should be proposed to provide fire protection LANDSCAPE AKCHITECTUKE AND PLANN INC September 9, 1998 Mr. Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 South Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Burlington International Airport Expansion and Parking Structure - Burlington, Vermont Minimum Landscaping Requirement Dear Mr. Ward: In response to your letter to Mr. Hamilton dated August 12, 1998 we would like to clarify the total cost of landscape expenditures for the airport project. As project designers we feel we have met the intent of the ordinance and would like to ask credit for the following items based on your ordinance which states that "...the Planning Commission may grant some credit for existing trees or site improvements other than tree planting as long as the objectives of this section are not reduced." During the site analysis phase of the project we identified a large number of mature trees, which if properly preserved, would provide landscape character and enhance the value of the project for the City and neighboring land owners. Great effort was expended in the design of the roads, placement of the structure and grading of the earthworks to achieve this goal. In fact the layout of the entire project was based upon saving these trees. In addition, twenty-two large trees of exceptional quality that could not be saved by the proposed construction were transplanted to locations along Airport Drive. These trees extend from the airport entry to Williston Road and have added significant value to the landscape character along Airport Drive. Another key design element of the landscape plan are the large perennial beds. These plantings will provide an incredible display of both seasonal color and winter texture. These plantings and their special planting bed requirements represent a significant portion of the landscape budget. Additional landscape design elements that add value to the project and should be considered for credit include: 9. 850 linear feet of curvilinear sidewalk on the northeastern side of Airport Drive where no walk existed. e. The decorative stone wall which raises the entry sign and creates a sense of entry for the project and e. The aesthetic shaping of the landscape berms to create visual character and help screen the structure from adjoining properties. 156 COLLEGE STREET, BURLINGTON V E K N1 0 IN T 0 5 4 0 1 VOICE ( 8 0 2 ) 8 6 2 - 0 0 9 8 F A X ( 8 0 2 ) 8 6 5 - 2 4,4 0 270 GREENWICH AVENUE, GKEENW ICH, CONNECTICUT 06830 VO I C E ( 2 0 3 ) 8 C, 3 - 9 0 7 9 F A x ( 2 0 3 ) 6 6 1 - 0 5 4 -4 I Richard Ward September 9, 1998 Page 2 I have included an itemized list of the landscape expenses incurred by the contractor as well as a conservative estimate for the trees we saved and transplanted for your review. This total equals 202,282 dollars which we believe well exceeds the required landscape formula of 129,050 and the additional amount of 22,322 which was rolled over from the Pratt & Whitney/Aviation requirement. Current as -built drawings are also included as I believe the drawing you received was our punch list of items that the contractor still has to address. It is our belief that we have met the intent of the ordinance and are pleased with the outcome of the project. We would appreciate the opportunity to discuss this issue with you at your convenience. Sincerely, 117~1elO9�­ Mark P. Hamelin Enclosure Cc: Jesse Beck, FFF J.J. Hamilton, BIA Bob McEwing, BIA Bob Mildrum, ECI I LANDSCAPE EXPENDITURES BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT September 9, 1998 Phase I - Trees and Shrubs Phase 11 - Trees and Shrubs Phase 11 - Additional Street Trees (22 Linden, 3 Ash) Perennials and Special bed prep. Subtotal: Trees, shrubs, perennials Landscape stone wall at entry Relocation of granite airport sign Landscape berming, grading, seeding Existing trees saved* (69 coniferous trees, 34 deciduous trees) Large trees transplanted (19 decidous trees, 4, coniferous trees) Curvilinear sidewalk Total Landscape Expenditures and landscape credits ECI Expenditure 35,849.00 78,762.00 7,795.00 15,319.00 137,725.00 5,940.00 1,800.00 24,640.00 24,400.00 5,677.00 8,500.00 203,282.00 *NOTE: To determine a conservative estimate for the value of trees saved and relocated a unit cost to plant these trees at 2 V2 - 3" caliper was used — rather than replacement value which would be tremendous for large, mature trees. STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 STEVENF STITZEL PATTI R. PAGE* ROBERT E. FLETCHER JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M EUSTACE (-ALS0ADM=D IN N.Y) Mr. Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington VT 05403 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/`IDD) FAX (802) 660-2552 E-MAIL(FRQ,42555@AOL.COM) May 14, 1997 Re: Burlington International Airport Dear Ray: OF COUNSEL ARTHURW CERNOSIA Enclosed are three executed Site Plan Letters of Credit Agreement with regard to the above -referenced matter. Would you please execute all three Agreements, retain one for your file and return the other two to me. I have also enclosed the original Irrevocable Letter of Credit Number 3085 from The Howard Bank addressed to the City. Thank you. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, I'd I I /I- j Steven F . Stit el SFS/gmt Enclosures SON3285.COR 97-4432 Burlington Intemational Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, Vermont OW3 802/863-2874 Work Order Number REQUISITION ORDER No. 10107 RO El ROUTINE This is NOT a Purchase Order. E]URGENT For in-house use only. El EMERGENCY '-� '4' — __ Description of Work: Purchase From: �z Bill Job o: V-1 4: Terminal Airfield k ki—A7 Address:�--' Industrial -Administration K-P./ d Attn: Phone/FAX: r)j-e-- 75� _I�Acll MATERIALS Quantity Item No. Item Description Price/ea Total Account Code: Requesting Department: 7_0 DBE Contacts Made: Grant Total: (not including freight) 0 Freight ,41� D­;­­A 2- A --^-#-A M... '4 A -—-A 0­ x L1 - - - - - - W raw, 'Pt' Reviewed & Accepted By: Approved By: Dat DkWor of Aviation White and Blue - Accounting Pink - Supervisor Yellow - Requester Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 802t863-2874 Work Order Number / _�) REQUISITION ORDER El ROUTINE [_1 URGENT El EMERGENCY V" _ — f) No. 10108 RO This is NOT a Purchase Order. For in-house use only. " Description of Work: A.,I Purchase -From: Bill Job To: Terminal Airfield Address: Industrial Administration (7-P7/ 03 4 Attn: '�) Xz, lPhnnp/FAX- bAf I-T—n MATERIALS Quantity Item No. Item Description - I :na Account Code: Requesting Department: a V I= INOF APR 6 IM DBE Contacts Made: f of So. E LORWAP- I -4 V Ad- x- 7y 4 Ct Grant Total: (not including freight) 0:3, �2 -.13-9 OAT 0 Freight X, Reviewed & Accepted By: / Approved By: Reviewed & Accepted By: Approved By: White and Blue - Accounting Pink - Supervisor Yellow - Requester T 1RAINAGE NOT REQUIRED SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PHASE ONE PLANT LIST - (TREES AND SHRUBS) TREE SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PHASE ONE PLANT LIST - (TREES AND SHRUBS) TREE KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NA•7ES ISZE REMARKS A.0 0ra 5— u 3 . ] vY U D.B. a•ar s.w Nn+. AJ Au. yn.ru Nwr.. n T ) ! v]' G D.B. Brur4 {' p•w..ary Ma .nw. VY C.L D.B l.41r lN.a rJ 10' 51. rJ rf. -.3 r,«. pNe. B4u Sra T { - r e.e rr R 6-.a 0.e - r3 -B 1— 4•w uNu rro ] a - a' BIB 1. rs-n r... ...r. uN.. r.r • { - a B.e w ! R. !—.rs.rin. JN,— T.rr L.« O . - ] VY C•L B.B. N«... S.— «.a !' $,— cairn C«rw• Vl.c - -- ] .. 1" e.6 a T— — TO T..Jr «e....... u4.. c.•w a0 . - r rw w....a p— i• O c SHRUB ! R Rr nr.r R.i.r R.r ]! la - ]•' C G_ rN.. aa• 0 C. V O Varr Muu ..ter v�✓.v I•i a - •• c G_ I{ r�rn a.' O C VT Viw-r V...w Arrn C.....I.n, D.•. •a l - •• C G. ri rin. •!' C C. .1 711 Z400 �Rei pc Q� A ?ti SEP 3 0 ��4g City of So. Burlington G=® O .OJLOMG _TREE PLANTING DETAIL AAr' ... b!T°R,.4C. �r' -_-• NOT TO SCALE O•�-/---- 13 cicD rG ym ^ P1 •'� , I O t I �� • r•_ ToZpo �._._ m t: A _. `' /• V ' ►HAlE ONE LANODCA.E NSTALLATION LMF" G - 1 c �� , ' •NFB1$ ND 231 C.AL• rAe[MG O �. r�r�� V •" CxICTI4G - 331 CAR! _ .- ti,. � --9 -i ` I i � I{I �I1• �;ITII 1IT I � —�t-- � __ --_ 1 / : \ •� - 1 -�� V I i� �'i �J I �-I- I I � I I � I I � I � I�� I I I I I I 1 .1 11 I I� I�I� � �I � E4P_C1E-.ARKING I yG � I� - i-- _ 4iPOgT LOrvG?PV PAaaING F y'- NMI ,�� ROMEaq �� �r� ,! - :pry ►n. _;M1►p"{ -• _�L-s,v �.7d� a :s-,+r.1A SIG; �'� _-s-��-•• � t � � �O °e d � � s {•- �!��=�_. � •' = -� � 7� �iiMlscii� 'i �_ �'* \'r aa`fs�'rs or*s^!a4Fs-.€'.�-" ��'�.:'+w M A'�f•=} =-�',•. �E ,�S�G_ an_•ti:�L,:� ��� �1i� � �� � �� 0 00 q) ppr'O � �� i611' '.o. -- ' - _ _ -- . _ - ' � � fir`• � 5. �__�� � ,I, ..i���JSLF ! e %�w r'-`y�.7i �A��• � ?:, � ��l�'� A' � ;Y:.,J� � � fir .r C `�? __ i ��� •f•Fl � '•ii�ir �`.s4�"]7�F- 1.�%. J._. '� I [� �` �� i►i1stS \_-ssfll� +�.f:�oC'�=5a?f?•:�tkiF� it- ��IA��������.L�:�:;Ia�'�w _ _ r � ��� /i/i�yTC �rin�.�i� -�B:iu :�� �A�G\ a�..aavY r•�8�� i�� ' �%�1�1 �!��:�� � �v c a O ; OBI I"•.r i I°f i Z 2 U f PHA5E TWO PLANT LIST - TREES AND SHRUBS TREE KET BOTANICAL NAME hM N NAME$ CTY. 51ZE REMARKS 1 4C A•nn.v.r .wYnr. Srl� ]I ] - ] Vr COL 5.p 11-4. 5u• —, / .M A•rb• M.•.Yn.. C.� Ywre•.wL 3 3 V] - r CY. e.8 N n w Wn.nY. rw nW v a - 3 V]' CI. B.S. nnc4rL .' M �y Inw) p n- S..I. , 1— Yu pro 21 ] - ] Vr CY B.S. 5,,& 5— ra CT CnY,. r..... Rwusw C A. : 2.12 - 3- CY. BID. fr , n 5rr..r a 2112 - 3- CI B.S. n...r. V p,—,, w .n...r 45 M— T... a ] Vo - 3' CI p.a ,a n G-n rG-•] rm 0.. n 5ev 5-1 as n. 5"".] . - W - r p.5, .r p.p NI r.. 5s. r G.-n rY.. ,r.. uw 5•w w a - . p.e •r S.e. •a en ,a r 5 -.3 rr.. n.r6Y a�u nM 3 - .' p.5. rr _ F �y1 ([�� j1 ,� J va - a• cY. 5.e nr J L 1 `� i 3 R arw •.n+)n. wr Trn L.,. 31 ] - 3 V r Cl D.e • r, a..•r.kY ..r Crn LAr - r.w .� 3 - .' S.S.) +..N. /3• T c Tr ow.n.c..•.-. c..w... L.r.• ]] a v:-r c.L e.e. r e..nY.. w. m.� SHRUB ARUC City So. Bura�ngtor Cnw..rw rsY,u G•.tiw.y G...v.nw .] i.-].• GG-M1.l nl.•3a'oC of .c c...w. Rrlrl.w..w u 3 - . B.S u„.. nira .r o c R-R Rr •y.r tYr R.r nl N - 25' C G. l— 31• o c 51. ar... war 'nw pn..wm• S..n I+O ] - 3' c G- .r 1— 31- o C. V o vfrw nr.. 'G—, c— R+n.n C,—" 30' c G. na nrw u' o c v--T v..rr v.... .Ynrw c,—, 5-3. 3 - . Via•,.• C , ' apilD -- n n h Z' DARK M ILCH �rLANTMr, MIX: • IE' 2 -ARTS TO'SO'L - SPACNd, AS I PART IN-LRVA_E COMPCST • INDICAT:a —�c �ii.:iDlO -- -_ i:o ii :•3!a A I R P-'-0=+2- T — PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL cALE: r.l'-O• ......... I-----,-,-,",- •`r PERENNIAL PLANT LIST SCTANICAL NAMS COMMON NAMES CT7. -S;Z3 REMARKS .. ANY �wV. lrw !M M ♦ • r W. Iw 2Y OC. AC ♦Y. I.ww IW' Iwr Aw.V•y • I Ci IIw 1r O.G C2 Crrwrr...Awer Al— 9— DAw 2. C'. Cw.ww .Y.r1« Tr«y n.w.w Cr.ww 70 r W. nw wa ].• o e M ....r. rlrw •rIN�.! �w. 10 1 W, w ]I O C w! r.rA wrArr �wr 4 1 O.l Iw N' O.0 6 r. ]r.nw IIYww r w Or..• .+ M 1 W. Iiw ]r OC n5 nwr ww •0•rAw.w^ nNw yr N 1 W M M' O G K Ir.w yW Iwln. �w.. Tw !•w' Imo... ]I 7 OA aLa 21 OG •. •rw.. ryw fr4aYi ly.wN i�w 1 Gi nw 21 DC SS S.r r.urr Ar. Jw' A•r" +w S•A. 1 GL nw 21 0 G T.a. raw, Mj w.. M.rI. • 1 Cr Pr. 21 0 C TC I— I.e Trs. a 1 GA Iw 21 0 C IN peal' G i+ r; B ad U SEP 3 C± J city of So. Burhn9tr9,_---- IATCHLINE rffi� 7 J L D D D DAZE: 9CA E: r BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 4/3D/9f r - 4q Z OIIAR)i BY' C1E0® By, SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT ` i PRO&CT RA TREE PLANTING PLAN 9633 SURVEYED LITTLE RIVER SURVEY COMPANY DESIGNED KATHLEEN RYAN DRAWN RAW CHECKED JLL, JBL APPROVED GAE r DATE AUGUST 96 SCALE 1 "= 20' 1 boa PROJECT NO. 04-9610 11`\\`\`\�\ •\ \ \' 1 \ \\\IN 1i.`\ IN,,j�`.�1 1 �\ �1 \I``\ 1•,.'� \� \ `` 1 11 \ \ 1 1 if W r� 0 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PRATT AND WHITNEY BUILDING SITE AND ACCESS ROAD LANDSCAPING PLAN M co2 M O m (n z m T O D Z p y Z r �z N D Z 08 O_ L iln v M y o _,. Me c rro 0 SURVEYED LITTLE RIVER SURVEY COMPANY__ BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT -� DESIGNED DMC KATHLEEN RYAN DRAWN MAM AVIATRON BUILDING ADDITION CHECKED JBL APPROVED GAE DATE JAN_ 97 SITE AND LANDSCAPING PLAN 'b SCALE 1 "= 20' mA PROJECT NO. 04-9614 RECEI-Av 1 = A \ JUN 2 1 1996 I City of So. Burlington - i i \� x I \ \ Yi, I Kathleen 11yan l A N U S C A ► F A A C H I T E C T orb Ilr .r,.n �r� ru�r rlm.�r r �1 rl�lr �It rr•t \I �-tr r 1'Lrurrur� Ilurlurc•t..tr. \ 1 It�, III) lo,.nl'Lnmmc 1111121MW Wil REV. DATE DESCRIPTION MADE CHECKED APP'D N0. BY BY BY BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Landscape Plan PROFIOSBO AVIATRON BUILDING SURVEYED WEBSTER—MARTIN, INC. iM = 20' DESIGNED CONSULTING ENGINEERS DRAWN SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT PROJECT NO. TRACED A DVI COMPANY 04-9602 CHECKED SUBMITTED DATE DRAWING NO. JUNE 96 L ,14 1_ 1;FLFL='02 ZED-_�c_ �[ - ���EI F'HaE-.01 Post -It' Note 7671 Oyu a 7 pag�3► l/ Tv -_j From r11( /VC t.✓ Co/Dept ` Co Phone N Phone Y J Fax N Fax x SIT NA LR OF AGREEMENT TRIG AORZBXZNT, executed in duplicate by and between Bar i gtoon International Airgor , hereinafter referred to as "Developer", and the city --of South Burlington, hereinafter referred to as "Municipality". WITNZSBZTa: 1/HEREAB, Developer has received site plan approval from the Municipality's Planning Coltmission for the development located at Bgrli-Agton International Airport, as depicted on a site plan entitled 412ratt_i Whit eXII, dated June_ 1226, and prepared by jgbpjer and Martin. ing neers. WSERRXB, Developer is required by said approval, at its own expense, to complete certain improvements; and WABREAB, the parties to this Agreement wish to establish in writing the obligations of the Developer as set forth in the City approval; and WOW TSERIS?ORB, the parties hereby covenant and agree and follows: 1. Developer will, at its own expense, complete the following construction depicted and in accordance with the specifications set forth in said site plan and related documents: Landscapina valued at $24,000 in_accardanee v th baracrach 3 of lindinag og Pao and Decision for the Prat itlfhitney service facility dated 8j6 96. 2. The Developer shall complete the improvements set forth in paragraph one as follows: a. Landscaping valued at $11,375 to ba -completed by June 1. 1997 at the Pratt i Whitney sitot, b. Landscaping valued at 812,67S to be completed by June 1. 1994, and to be accomplished along Airport Drive a& y7art of terl>ninai area improve ent Projects. 3. Developer shall replace or repair any defective or improper work or materials which may be recognized within three (3) years after completion of the improvements set forth in paragraph one. For the �-yF-41-0 '�; 7 .' _s ? 1,F='_ _rTFF,:r=T --= _r'_-�-=r, J===111'=' PHiE:0- purpose of this Agreement, "completion" shall be deemed to have occurred when .the Municipality has inspected and approved the construction of all the improvements required by this Agreement and issued written notice to the Developer that the construction is complete. 4. For the guaranty of Developer's performance of all requirements hereinabove set forth, and as a condition of the zoning permit for the Pratt a Whitney service building, Developer indicates that this .is its true intention and desire and pledges its full support. 5. This Agreement shall terminate and shall be of no force or effect upon performance of all requirements contemplated hereby, and the completon of the warranty period set forth in paragraph three (3). 6. No sum shall be maintained in escrow in support of this Agreement; however, inspection of said landscaping by the Municipality and identification of a problem or deficiency, followed by submission cf H written report to the Developer outlining the deficiency shall result in action within an agreed upon period QL time to correct the deficiencyy. 13. This Agreement aYfall not only binding upon the parties hereto, but also their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. BURLINGTON INTZRNATIONAL• AIRPORT Dated at this day of 0 1997. Witness By: Witness Duly Authorized Agent CITY OF BOOTN BURLINGTON Dated at this day of o 1997. Witness Witness By: - -- Duly Authorized Agent City of South Burlington Zoning permit for land development Pursuant to provisions set forth in Title 24, Chapter 117 Section 4443 subsection (1) and Section 2,7.10 of the South Burlington Z in Regulations this permit s hereby issue on his �` day, f / /� 19�to c R - dv- M L.l � G TO r� Y��Fo Al ca o9k Elk ANY] OJIMAM""19MM in accordance wltn a appiicatlon apprpv�s�J�� y the S ut url% ton Planning Commission on rr'' TIO u � This permit is subject to appeal w th d teen 5 ays from the date of issuance in accordance with Section 4443 subsection (3)9 Title 24 Chapter �117. m nistrative Officer City of South Burlington This permit allows for site improvements only it does not permit the construction or alteration of any structures. Permit is subject to conditions and bond requirements set forth by the City of South Burlington. PHi iE : i 11 5 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DATE: April 23, 1997 TO: Ray Belair, South Burlington Planning FR: Bob McEwing, Airport Engineer RE: Interim Construction Permit: Airport Terminal Projects Outlined below is the anticipated schedule for the initial phases of construction at Burlington International Airport related to expansion of the terminal and construction of a parking structure: Phase 1 A consisting of site work related to relocation of utilities, repaving of two existing parking lots, construction of the new access road into the FAA parking lot and the new interior road to the long term parking lot (Park & Travel) is anticipated to start on Monday April 28. Munson Earthmoving has the contract for site work and will be installing silt fencing, clearing trees and bringing in work trailers during the period April 22-25. Phase 1 B consisting of construction of a temporary exit road from the terminal area and partial construction of the new entrance road to the terminal area is anticipated to start on May 19. Work on the parking structure is scheduled to start on June 16 with work on the terminal building starting approximately one week later on .tune 23. We realize that the issue of landscaping escrow/bonding has not been settled, however, we need to start on basic site work on schedule in order to meet the completion date of November 15 for the parking structure. Therefore, we request a site development permit which would include the work described in Phases I and 1 B and also would include use of the properties along Airport Drive adjacent to Park & Travel for parking. If you have questions or would like to discuss this request, please give me a call. Thank you for your assistance. (-*-wl) (802) 863-2874 TpD 1200 Airport Drive, #1. SouthBurlington, Vermont 05403 FAX (802) 863-1526 State of Vermont WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules Effective August 8, 1996 Case Number: WW-4-1042 PL'�: EJ96-0386 Landowner: City of Burlington Address: 1200 Airport Drive, # 1 South Burlington, VT 05403 This project, consisting of constructing a new 353,100 square foot parking garage and a 12,900 square foot addition to the airport terminal building at the Burlington International Airport, served b , municipal water and sewer services, located off Airport Drive in the town of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. This permit does not constitute approval under Act 250 case number 4C0331. GENERAL 1 _ This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry -phone (802) 828-2106 or (802) 658-2199 and local officials prior to pr6ceeding with this project. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division: 04-9618 UP.3 "Utility Plan" dated 3-17-97 revised 3-07-97; Sheet UP.5 "Utility Plan" dated 3-17-97 revised 3-07-97; Sheet UP.7 "Utility Plan" dated 3-17-97 revised 3-07-97; and Sheet SS.1 "Sanitary Sewer Line Profile & Details" dated 3-17-97 revised 3-14-97 prepared by Webster -Martin, Inc.. - The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. No alterations to the building that would change or affect the exterior water supply or sewage disposal, or the approved use of the building shall be allowed without prior review and approval from the Agency of Natural Resources. 4_ The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the sewage and water systems for public buildings under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 61 - Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose C Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-1042 City of Burlington Page 2 of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental/health statutes and regulations, with this permit. 6. A copy of the approved plans and this permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. WATER SUPPLY 7. The water main extension is approved provided the water main extension is constructed in strict accordance with the Agency of Natural Resources, Water Supply Division's "Public Water System Permit to Construct " Project #E-0684 WSID #5091 to & dated &. SEWAGE DISPOSAL 8. A professional engineer, registered in the State of Vermont, is to generally supervise the construction of the sanitary sewer line extensions and, upon completion of construction, the supervising engineer is to submit to the Wastewater Management Division a written certification stating all construction has been completed in accordance with the stamped approved plans. The engineer's certification is to be submitted to the Division prior to the occupancy of any unit and the certification shall include, but not be limited to, the numerical results of all leakage testing performed on each segment of the sanitary sewer extension and all manholes, as described in Appendix A, of the Environmental Protection Rules. Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-1042 City of Burlington Page 3 9. The project is approved for wastewater disposal by connection to the municipal sewer system for a maximum of 1500 gallons of sewage per day. No other method of wastewater disposal shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division, and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this April 10, 1997. Canute E. Dalmasse, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer c For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission & Selectboard Webster -Martin, Inc. Act 250 coordinator-4C0331 Department of Labor & Industry Water Supply Division- -- �•�,v�,r-vry �,r v...v.....�..r ,,,�uv��iw �nl. I LJV) l PROJECT REVIEW SHEET \ ?) THIS IS NOT A PERMIT ,- 7T.- E PERIM I T S R_Si'O`;SE T E d29 ! ,i PENDING APPLICATION # 0 iS: R.0T OWN SGtt714 A&0(.l toa 7-01J PIN OWNER 0= PROJECT SITE: NAM-: (2t7Y AF ALL0-f-(A1CT01,) ADDR=ss- 10700 1410-P60-r U. � i mrj &ALIKiCTWOI VE aV63 TELEPFONE: il? ^ a007(� APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: Based on information 1provided by on-2;Z/91117 a project was reviewed on a Lact1tracts cf land of 511A— acres, located on 4ijemcr M. . The project is generally described as: R+ C-rA otc7/o.) OF 3S3 /M Sr. OA",KI QA"Ctf C 3 L*-VC6S) - Com4'T ae -rrdoj of /d, gav s.�', dt7to� i0 ?f �tCIST/WGNardAL /5uI1.tAl><14°l F�rcaC�7� ltQoO r. 8F aJATCAL1XJC,4 40e A. 64 GtRdUr7y SEw�,� /�scdC;Pa-�it►eQ ftv ►kuOteA04L WA-1X011;1Ewcr,Q u.SACo.c Prior Permits From This Office: _ �� 33 ,�-et-off PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION 1. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD (ACT 250) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V.S.A. SEC. 6007(C)). Commercial, residential or municipal project? Length of newtmproved road(s) Has the landowner subdivided before? When/where/# of lots AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED-_K_YES NO. Copies sent to Statutory Parties: YES NO COMMENTS: EWRONMEWAL COtiOVMSfiM DISTF3fC;fS #4. 6, 6, S SIGNATURE:--ZAA..t DATE: I DD S (IF DIFFERENT): i i i %M STE T (yscisi!a+at) District Coordinator Telepho e J 10.2 ESSEX ANCTION - M p M 2. �STEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRED --YES NO Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Subdivision Wor Exemption Deferral of Subdivision TentlTravel Trailer Campground Mobile Home Park Sewer Extension REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: AGENCII Of NATURAL RESOURCES �j�y Kn Of UffIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SIGNATURE: !i DATE2g7-`"-_ADDRESS: III WEST STREET t/Environmental As4fstance Division ESSEX 1UNCTIOK VT VA52 Wastewater Management Division Telephone: (802) 879-6563 THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON -BINDING DETERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PERMITS YOU MAY NEED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION 3. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3822) Contact: Discharge Permit; pretreatment permits; industrial, municipal Stormwater permits Indirect cscharge permit Residuals management sludge disposal (OVER) ,JPaCS �/U OTHER PERMITS YOU MAY NEED: (Contin( 1 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3840) Contact:_s— 7 Construction/modification of source Waste oil burning 00pen Burning Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation Industrial Process A. irr Emissions Diesel Engines (> 200 bHP)Z/k WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) Contact: /L &- Underground injection control (Floor Drains) Well head prote lion areas Bottled Water tom' Construction Permit, water system improvements Permit to operate New Source WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR Contact: Hydroelectric Projects (241-3770) Use of chemicals id State waters(241-3777) Shoreland encroachment (241-3777) Aquatic nuisance control (241-3777) �c Wetlands (241-3770) Section 401 Water Quality Certificate; (241-3770) Stream Alteration (748-8787/786-5906) Water Withdrawal (241-3770) 7. WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: Hazardous waste treatment, storage, disposal facility certificate (241-3888) Hazardous waste handler notification requirement (241-3888) Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities, drop off (241-3444)' Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) - - 8. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR(802-241-3737) Contact: Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft-)(241-3451) Municipal water/sewer Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888) _ Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) Compostingfacirities (241-3444) HW transporter certificate (241-3888) 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) 10. DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE, ANR (802-2413700) Contact: Nongame & Natural Heritage program (Threatened & Endangered Species) Stream Obstruction Approval 11. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (802-828-2106) or District Office# Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, 'access Boiled and pressure vessels Storage of flammable liquids, explosives LP Gas Storage Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers 12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors Program for asbestos control & lead certification Children's camps Hot Tub Installation & Inspection - Commercial 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Child care facilities (241-2158) Nursing Homes (241-2345) Contact: Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept of Aging & Disabilities) Therapeutic Community Residence (241-2345) 14. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Contact: Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) Junkyards (828-2049) Signs (Travel information Council) (828-2651) Railroad crossings (828-2760) Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) Airports and landing strips (828-2833) . Construction within state highway right -of way (Utilities, Signs, etc.) (828-2653) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Contact: Use/sale of pesticides (828-2431) Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-2426) Milk processing facilities (828-2433) Animal shefters/kennelsAivestock dealers (828-2421) Golf courses (828-2431) Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431) Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Oleo/Class "C" Pesticides (828-2436) 16. PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD (802-828-2358) Hydro projects Sells water to 1 or more persons 17. DMSION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3226) Historic buildings Archeological sites 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) Liquor licenses General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1=802-828-2366) Business registration Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551) Business taxes (sales, meals & rooms, amusement machines) 21. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2074) Fuel taxes; commercial vehicle Franchise taxtsolid waste .00AL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) W FEDERAL PERMITS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BLDG 10-18, CAMP JOHNSON, COLCHESTER, VT 05446 (655-0334) DTHER:t' d//AG17 1EVISION DATE: 8/23I95 State of Vermont 'ywrl ME - Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist February 26, 1997 City of Burlirigton 1200 Airport Drive, # 1 - South Burlington VT 05403 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conser`'atim Wastewater Management D'niiwi Essex Junction Regional Oliim 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 (802) 879-6563 .. b a'y .a' 'F em . Subject: WW-4-1042 -- construct a 353;100 s.f. parking garage, 12,900 s.f. addition to terminal. relocate water line & gravity serer, 1500 gpd, mun w/s, 942 acres located on Airport Drive in South Burlington, Vermont Dear Applicant: We have received your application and fee paid by check #Exempt on February 18, 1997, which begins the 45 day in -home performance standards for our review. If we require further information from you to make a decision, the time until '%ve row it is not included in the in-house performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 45 in-house days, please contact this office at (802) 879-6563. We have forwarded your application to the Information Specialist, who will send you a Project Review Sheet indicating -o*rr state departments you should contact about additional permits you may need. If you have not already done so, you should Aso check with town officials about any necessary town permits. I Sincerely, Ernestine Chevrier Secretary C City of South Burlington Planning Commission Webster -Martin, Inc. J PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 February 27, 1997 J.J. Hamilton Director of Aviation Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Terminal Building Addition & Parking Structure Dear Mr. Hamilton: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the'February 11, 1997 Planning Commission meeting minutes and Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project. Please note the conditions of approval and the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. 'Oinc rely,,. t J r4�-- /Je Weith, y Planner JW/mcp 2 Encls cc: John Leinwohl Jesse Beck Lou Borrie Memorandum - February 11, February 7, Page 4 Planning 1997 agenda items 1997 3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the new addition. 5. Any change to the plans shall require approval from the South Burlington Planning Commission. 4) CITY OF BURLINGTON - PARKING GARAGE & TERMINAL EXPANSION - G T f: PT.AN This project consists of: 1) constructing a 13,240 square foot addition to an existing 72,625 square foot airport terminal building, 2) constructing a multi -level parking structure for 1108 vehicles, and 3) constructing new employee and long term surface parking areas. This property located at 1200 Airport Drive lies within the Airport and Airport Industrial Districts. Access/circulation: Access will be provided by the three (3) curb cuts on Airport Drive and via White Street Extension. The three (3) curb cuts on Airport Drive from south to north include a 28 foot ingress only curb cut, a 28 foot egress only curb cut and 16 foot ingress only curb cut. White Street Extension will provide ingress and egress access to the long term parking area. The long term lot access road should be for two (2) way traffic and the plan so modified. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Due to the vast size of the airport property, building and overall coverages were not calculated. Front yard coverage along Airport Drive is 28.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). The parking structure does not meet the front yard setback �r requirement (see discussion below regarding building height). They terminal addition will meet the setback requirements. 4 Memorandum - February 11, February 7, Page 5 Planning 1997 agenda items 1997 Parking: There are no minimum parking requirements for an airport terminal in the zoning regulations. This proposal will increase the total number of parking spaces from 1687 spaces to 2179 spaces or a 492 space increase. A bike rack and 16 handicapped spaces will be provided. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on XI building costs, is $129,050 which is being met. This requirement ?'l includes the shortfalls on four (4) previously approved projects.�r� Proposed plantings will include Downy Shadblow, Norway Maple, Red Maple, White Birch, Summit Ash, White Spruce, White Pine and Arborvitae. The applicant is proposing a dense buffer of landscaping and low , berms along Airport Drive. The berming and landscaping along the - `" long term parking area should be installed prior to use of this �r' area as an interim parking lot during construction of the garage. If this is not possible, some sort of screening (i.e., fence) should be installed on a interim basis. Sewer: The additional sewer allocation requested is 1500 gpd. The -� applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit. Building height: The terminal addition meets the 35 foot height limit. The elevator tower on the parking structure will exceed the 35 foot height limit by three (3) feet. Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations allows the Planning Commission to approve a non- residential structure with a height in excess of the limitations "provided the Commission determines that a taller structure: (i) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (ii) will not detract from the important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way." In addition to the above criteria, Section 25.113(d) of the zoning regulations requires that for each foot of additional height above the normal 35 foot maximum, all front and rear setbacks shall be increased by one (1) foot. The additional three (3) feet of front yard setback is not being provided. The Planning Commission does not have the authority to waive the setback requirements. The site 5 Memorandum - February 11, February 7, Page 6 Planning 1997 agenda items 1997 plan should be revised to meet this requirement. The applicant is working on reducing the height of the elevator tower and will have the exact height at the meeting. Section 25.113(e) of the zoning regulations requires that the request for approval of a taller structure shall include the,^ submittal of plans showing the elevations and architectural design of the structure, existing grade, post -construction grade, and height of the structure. These plans have been submitted. The applicant will be required to abide by the approved elevations. Traffic: A traffic study was prepared (see enclosed). This study concludes that "although this project involves the development of a parking structure to replace an existing parking lot, no increases in activity levels, and as a result in vehicular volumes, are anticipated for the airport site." This study recommends the following improvements: 1. A northbound right -turn lane at the Airport entrance. ,• 2. A southbound left -turn lane at the Airport entrance. 3. A northbound left -turn lane at Airport Drive/Airport Roads intersection. The plans should be revised to provide details of these street improvements. These improvements should be constructed prior to occupancy of the parking structure. Lighting: Exterior lighting will consist of the following: --- 145-250 watt metal fixtures mounted on --- 46-175 watt metal fixtures mounted on --- 80-175 watt metal fixtures mounted on --- 174-100 watt metal structure. halide lamps with downcasting shielded 20 foot poles. halide lamps with downcasting shielded 12 foot poles. halide lamps with downcasting shielded 40 poles with a 12 foot height. halide lamps mounted within the parking A point by point lighting plan was submitted which indicates an average of 2.74 footcandles for the total site. The zoning regulations have a 3 footcandle maximum. Parkinq Structure Standards: It appears that the parking structure complies for the most part with recommended standards for parking 6 idr Memorandum - Planning February 11, 1997 agenda items February 7, 1997 Page 7 structures in terms of dimensions of parking spaces and aisles, circulation patterns, distance between parking spaces and elevators/stairwells, and lighting levels. The applicant should indicate the ramp slope within the garage (should not exceed 15%). Also, the applicant should address security in the garage (i.e., lighting only, foot patrols, cameras, etc.) Airport Drive widening: Section 25.101 of the zoning regulations indicate that Airport Drive is planned to be widened by 14 feet, seven (7) feet on either side. The Public Works Superintendent has recommended that the applicant dedicate seven (7) feet to the City for future widening. Other: --- site plan Extension --- site plan structure --- a third submitted, ,a should show the r.o.w. boundaries for White Street-' should show the exact with stairway towers. floor plan for the footprint of the new parking R\ parking structure should be-' 5) P.S.H., INC. - CONGREGATE HOUSING EXPANSION - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of amending a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 39,300 square foot general office building (building "A"), a 124 unit congregate housing facility, and a 79 unit extended stay hotel. The amendment consists of: 1) resubdividing lots #3 and 4, 2) reducing the size of the general office building from 39,300 square feet to 24,480 square feet, 3) construct a 60 unit congregate housing facility, and 4) subdividing lot #4 into two (2) lots of 5.42 acres and 0.7 acres. The ZBA on 1/27/97 granted the applicant a conditional use permit for the proposed building and to extend the regulations for the R7 District 50 feet beyond the district line into the CD3 District, and a variance to allow a portion of the building to exceed the 45 foot height limit by seven (7) feet. This property located at 421 Dorset Street lies within the CD3 and R7 Districts. It is bounded on the south by a multi -family residential development and GMP sub -station, on the east by Dorset Street, on the north by Sherry Road and some residences and on the west by Oakwood Drive and some residences. 7 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802)658-7955 August 12, 1998 J. J. Hamilton Director of Aviation Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive # 1 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Landscaping Requirements Reference: Airport Terminal Expansion and Parking Structure Dear Mr. Hamilton: ZONING (802)658-7958 Upon review of the landscaping as -built plan as submitted by Michael Willard, Dunn Hamilton & Kane, we find that the total value is short of the minimum required under Section 26.105 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The minimum landscaping requirement based on building cost was one hundred twenty nine thousand and fifty ($129,050) dollars. In addition, twenty two thousand three hundred and twenty two ($22,322.00) dollars in landscaping value was proposed at the Airport terminal area due to a shortfall at the Pratt & Whitney building and the Aviatron building. We are of the opinion that the total value of materials installed is one hundred eighteen thousand three hundred and thirty seven ($118,337.00) dollars. Therefore, the Burlington International Airport landscaping plan as approved by the South Burlington Planning Commission is short approximately thirty three thousand ($33,000.00) dollars. In order to resolve this matter, the amended landscaping plan must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. Please contact the Planning staff for scheduling of the next meeting. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp cc: Attorney Joseph Mclean ( LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Preliminary Opinion of Probable Costs Burlington International Airport Expansion Key Species Quantity Unit Cost Sub Total AC Downy Shadblow 87 3 yy- $250 $21,750 AP Norway Maple 104 01S $300 $31,200 BP White Birch 52 ?5-�-$200 $10,400 FP Summit Ash 27 $250 $6,750 PG #1 (8-10') White Spruce 33 $175 $5,775 PG #2 (6-8') White Spruce 38 fiC'�s $130 $4,940 PG #3 (3-4') White Spruce 13 "3 zS $50 $650 PN #1 (8-10') Austrian Pine 365f'J-° $175 $6,300 PN #2 (6-8') Austrian Pine 50 $130 $6,500 PN 43 (3-4') Austrian Pine 19 $50 $950 PS #1 (8-10') White Pine 15 y% 0' $175 $2,625 PS 42 (6-8') White Pine 16 /'�� $115 $1,840 PS #3 (3-4') White Pine 5 �� �L $50 $250 SV 4-L Common Lilac 67 %U $150 $10,050 TO Dark Green Arborvitae 32 3V7 if $125 $4,000 Shrubs and Perennials Subtotal 15% Contigency TOTAL $50,000 $163,980 1 $24,597 F-$ 188,577 106 Souch Lnwn ;creec Burhn,tun. Vermont 05401 (8021-6'-11CQw Fax �K2�.*)5-_440 <vo x 09Q Q) C, ol coo / //0 ago 'I-C7 � I � i -_; , ,I ��Ol rrtf���;►v.,r�.,�1N1 LIST - jkkit,5 MW. §ti� TREE . JQirX .D// WCAri6 &S.� Q iNt ram AIR, • i�7rb ' , A.C. Amsbncbrar cWwdW4a Dow% shesim � 2 - 2 Vr CM. 1!fl aj ,3w*e Stgm. I4aarta A.M. ik"*"- b"Oem"*0 Camom H wwc 3 2 V2 - r Cal. DO. PuM A.P. Aasr alstanwWsa - Were" 11"4 3 - 3 L-*2* CM. 00. HL (Mrn.) D.P. Setala Ofterdera WNte arch 2 - 2 V2' Cid. ; $$Mi6, Fail C.T. Catallo *006 Nortbern Ca ulpm 2 2 V3 - 3' Cal: ►. F.P. framm Mw'IIwOIM 'Sr~Mt' Sant Ask �Jf� 2 V2 - D' Cal. am, M tcb@A v Dr -w- (MuL) G.D. GwAtSo blobs 'Awwon G@W M"nism Tmw 3 2 V2 - 3` CAL am. Full P.G.-Sl Prpa #ONCa Whine spew* -so-- a - 10' ate. Full P.G.-42 pocsg Ob"m WNts SraWs 4i L - at' , mos, FUN Paw giewi WMte 5"" �' G - 6' sm. Fyp P.N.-tll Pwys a As*xw Pins ;$ i - 10' M. Ftill P.N.-42 lsrrws Arrow+ Puss to - 4' ate. pw PAL-*$ y� �� Am*#m Pm � S - is be. run P.S.--m " *-vim WNts PM -#' a - 10, be. " P.'S.—s2 PWn dmbw WNte POW t - V 80. Irmo P.9-O Pwr atrAw wNts Pins i - L' DID. Pull R.P. 14@bww p --j i m e I D" Loc at 1 2 V2 - 3' Cal. 50. Full S.R. Sarxw rectwAfts Japswes Tres Lilac 34 2 - 2 1/2' CaL DID. Hsevy. 3araet+ cW bsad S.V. Sr vdw* C 0W DISC - Palle -3t-- e - 10' 593. 3 Trw * /Ds. 5HQU5 C.A. Ceteasaater arcdVL4 Crarb" Cetow"Osr 42 IS - 24' C.G.. FUL 10101 3i' O.C. R.C. 10-c 6da ! ptA§btense CatuAw ll iiaiWlran L3 3 - 4' Dtd, WNte. Plant 42' O.C. 'DwAe do X"W R.R. Rosa reap" Rraoaa Row Ill IS - 24" C.G.. Plant 3i' O.C. S.P. SWUM wvmfohs 'Pteme, eeth Sprea no 2 - 3' C.O.. M. Plant 3L' O.C. V.O. Cat lR�M4 "ca I�t 24 - 30' C.G.. 4% 41m*NL,*' O.C. �` As�a�raas Crahbewrr Drib 60 3 - 4' C.G.. Full. Plant W O.C. i AL jm r� V- QO—M CW - jj6MES, OTY_ REMARKS "A.C, AiNirW411W IRON Dow* ai -AlrI At— 2 - 2 1/20 Cal. did. Sit Stew. Hmvq A.P. Adder des NorN� �� 3 - 3 1/2- C.11. eta. Matal" i' srwwb+o Ht. (mro B.P. boub man Who 904 2 - 2 1/r Cal. be. SW40 stow. frr F.P. FEwmr. pi�lMt�rai e� .� 2 V2 - 3' Cal OW Mriol" V 4 Wt. (Mn.) P.G.-O PWM !fir "",swum S - 10' Dgll. fur Prr:-I* Pow 4900 Wlrtr SOW V sae. frr Phirs -*tea Wkt+ Sjce J i - i' CIE!!, frr ' R�.�1! E"Mt1,ab'abw Whd:� 'Pynt t - l0' dld, frr P.lf.rle'2 PRiw *%riw Wbts Pete r#— L - d' did. rw i�.5.- Pew �trapw Whitt Pww -tom 6 - 6' Did. fur S.R. rattaodrta jsww THe Ldec li 2 - 2 1/2' Cal. DID. Hwvg. SgwwU" he" S.V. S*rtMt vuloww GcMMon Lftc - Pwp4 _pl— d - 10' Did. 3 Tanks /Ea. T.Q. TiNtr► ocerdsnteW Cam, 400.._ 4 _ 6' Fund coNected. PMint 10' O.C. SHRUB R:R. Rom repo" Room@ now 25 l0 - 24' C.G.. PWnt 36- O.G. V.O. Viwenw dwvtatom Arrow W V* r+wa lia 3 - 4' C.G.. FdL Pleat 36' O.C. Y.T. Vlwrnwi tntobve Aww wan Cr&*Wrq Bob 45 3 4' C.G.. Fur. PWant 40' O.C. aodnoww SCHEDULE A 7/97 LANDSCAPE BOND 1. AIRPORT TERMINAL EXPANSION & PARKING GARAGE TERMINAL ADDITION & PARKING GARAGE $103,500 SNOW REMOVAL BUILDING 8,852 HERTZ ADDITION 11800 PRATT & WHITNEY BUILDING SHORTFALL 12,675 AVIATRON ADDITION SHORTFALL 2,223 2. PRATT & WHITNEY BUILDING 3. AVIATRON BUILDING U a �� O,� , a, , 4-- �� 9, 050 11,375 10,947 TOTAL $151,372 LC Howard Bank 111 Main Street, P.O. Box 409 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0409 (802) 658-1010 May 9, 1997 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 3085 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Ladies and/or Gentlemen: We hereby authorize you to draw on The Howard Bank, N.A. for the account of City of Burlington, City Hall, Room 22, Burlington, VT 05401, up to the aggregate amount of $151,372.00 available by your drafts at sight. The drafts drawn under this credit are to be endorsed thereon and shall state on their face that they are drawn under The Howard Bank, N.A., Burlington, Vermont, Letter of Credit Number 3085 dated May 9, 1997. The drafts drawn under said credit, must be accompanied by a written statement signed by a duly authorized agent of the City of South Burlington, that in the judgment of the City of South Burlington, The City of Burlington is in default under the terms of an agreement dated May 9, 1997, and that the funds to be drawn by the draft are in payment for, or in anticipation of payment for materials, labor and services required for completion of the improvements identified in the aforementioned agreement. Documents must be delivered to The Howard Bank, N.A., PO. Box 409, Burlington, Vermont, 05402-0409 and drafts must be drawn and negotiated no later than September 7,1997. This letter of credit will be automatically extended without amendments for an additional 120 day period, unless The Howard Bank gives notification thirty (30) days before expiration, that it does not intend to renew the letter of credit. Except so far as otherwise expressly stated, this credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, 1993 Revision, International Chamber of Commerce Publication Number 500. We hereby agree with drawers, endorsers and bona fide holders of the bills drawn in compliance with the terms of this credit that the bills shall be duly honored upon presentation at The Howard Bank, N.A. Very truly yours, *1'Daniels Senior Vice President loc3085 WBanknorth Group, Inc. SITE PLAN LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, executed in triplicate between the CITY OF BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipal corporation situated in Chittenden County, Vermont, hereinafter referred to as "DEVELOPER", THE HOWARD BANK, N.A., a national association with offices in Burlington, in the County of Chittenden, Vermont, hereinafter referred to as "BANK", and the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipal corporation situated in Chittenden County, Vermont, hereinafter referred to as "MUNICIPALITY". W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, DEVELOPER has received site plan approval from the MUNICIPALITY's Planning Commission for the development located at Burlington International Airport, as depicted on the following plans: 1. Plan entitled "Burlington International Airport, South Burlington, Vermont, Tree Planting Plan, for Project No. 9633," dated April 30, 1997, and prepared by Dunn & Associates. 2. Plan entitled "Burlington International Airport, Pratt & Whitney Building Site and Access Road, Landscaping Plan for Project No. 04-9610," dated August 1996, and prepared by Kathleen Ryan. 3. Plan entitled "Burlington International Airport, Landscape Plan Proposed Aviatron Building, for Project No. 04-96602," dated June 1996 and prepared by Webster -Martin, Inc. Consulting Engineers. 4. Plan entitled "Burlington International Airport, Aviatron Building Addition, Site and Landscaping Plan for Project No. 04-9614," dated January 1997 and prepared by Kathleen Ryan. WHEREAS, DEVELOPER is required by said approval, at its own expense, to complete the construction of the development site in accordance with the plans approved by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement wish to establish a mechanism to secure the obligations of the DEVELOPER for the work as set forth above; and 1 WHEREAS, the BANK executes this Agreement solely in the capacity of issuer of a Letter of Credit hereinafter specified; NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. DEVELOPER will, at its own expense, complete the landscaping identified on Schedule A attached hereto in accordance with the specifications set forth in the site plans and related documents identified above. 2. The DEVELOPER shall complete the improvements set forth in Item 1 of Schedule A no later than July 1, 1998, and shall complete the improvements set forth in Items 2 and 3 of Schedule A no later than September 1, 1997. 3. DEVELOPER shall replace or repair any defective or improper work or materials which may be recognized within two years after completion of the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1. For the purpose of this Agreement "completion" shall be deemed to have occurred when the MUNICIPALITY has inspected and approved the construction of all the improvements required by this Agreement and issued written notice to the DEVELOPER that the construction is complete. 4. For the guarantee of DEVELOPER's performance of all requirements hereunder set forth, DEVELOPER has caused• the BANK to issue its Irrevocable Letter of Credit in favor of the MUNICIPALITY, the original of which is attached to the MUNICIPALITY's copy of this Agreement, and a copy of which is attached to the DEVELOPER's copy of this Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, DEVELOPER shall cause the attached Letter of Credit to be renewed at least thirty (30) days before the maturity date thereof. Failure of DEVELOPER to deliver evidence of such renewal to MUNICIPALITY thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration of said Letter of Credit shall constitute a default of the terms of this Agreement. 5. Said Irrevocable Letter of Credit provides that the drafts drawn under said credit, must be accompanied by a written statement signed by a duly authorized agent of the MUNICIPALITY, that in the judgment of the MUNICIPALITY, the DEVELOPER is in default under the terms of this Agreement, and that the funds to be drawn by the draft are in payment for, or in anticipation of payment for materials, labor and services required for completion of the improvements identified in Paragraph 1. Payment of each draft will be made at sight when presented to the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY, the payment limited only by the aggregate amounts presented in relationship to the maximum amount of C the Letter of Credit. If DEVELOPER shall be in default of the Agreement for seven (7) days because of its failure to provide evidence or renewal of the Letter of Credit, required in Paragraph 4 above, the MUNICIPALITY shall notify DEVELOPER by certified mail of said default. DEVELOPER shall then within three (3) business days provide MUNICIPALITY with evidence of said renewal of Letter of Credit or MUNICIPALITY may notify BANK of such default and request payment under said Letter of Credit. 6. The MUNICIPALITY will promptly submit to the DEVELOPER a copy of any draft it submits to the BANK. The consent of the DEVELOPER to payment of said draft by the BANK to the MUNICIPALITY under said Letter of Credit shall not be required. 7. The MUNICIPALITY shall not file with the BANK a Statement of Default until ten (10) days after notice has been sent to the DEVELOPER, by certified mail, setting forth its intention to do so. 8. All funds drawn on the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant to the Letter of Credit shall be used solely by the MUNICIPALITY for the purpose of completing construction of the improvements identified in Paragraph 1. Any work contracted for by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis, or shall be performed by the MUNICIPALITY's own work force and equipment, or shall be accomplished in such other manner as in the judgment of the MUNICIPALITY shall accomplish the work more expeditiously and economically. 9. If payments are drawn on the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant to said Letter of Credit, and it shall later develop that a portion of the monies drawn are in excess of the MUNICIPALITY's needs, any such excess amount shall be refunded by the MUNICIPALITY to the BANK, to be credited by said BANK to the DEVELOPER. 10. This Agreement and said Letter of Credit shall terminate and shall be of no force and effect upon completion of the one year warranty period as described in the above Paragraph 3. If the MUNICIPALITY has not delivered any written notice to the DEVELOPER of any defective or improper work or materials in the construction of the improvements within the two (2) year period, or if notice has been given and the defective work or materials have been corrected by the DEVELOPER, the MUNICIPALITY shall forthwith notify the BANK in writing that the Letter of Credit may be canceled, and shall return the original Letter of Credit to the BANK, and both the DEVELOPER and the BANK 3 I shall be released from all obligations hereunder and under said Letter of Credit. 11. The BANK may not modify the Letter of Credit without first receiving written consent of the MUNICIPALITY. 12. DEVELOPER hereby agrees to indemnify and hold BANK harmless from all claims, causes of action or liability of any kind arising out of this Agreement or the issuance by BANK of this Letter of Credit, including attorney's fees, as long as BANK follows the terms and conditions outlined in said Letter of Credit. 13. This Agreement shall be binding on all parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. Dated at Vermont, this day of 1997. IN THE PRESENCE OF: CITY OF BURLINGTON J<lf I I By: �- uly AuthorY e f nt (DEVELOPER) Dated at a J L� � Vermont, this % �* day of 1997. IN THE PRESENCE OF: THE HOW D BAN' u By: btjYy Ai1thorized Age (BANK) D ted at,. ,�G./�.�6jU,(� , Vermont, this �`� day of b , 199 IN THE PRESENCE OF: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By: ( D , � I Duly Autho iz Agent (MUNICIPALITY) SON196.FOR H SCHEDULE A C' _i 197 LANDSCAPE BOND 1. AIRPORT TERMINAL EXPANSION & PARKING GARAGE TERMINAL ADDITION & PARKING GARAGE SNOW REMOVAL BUILDING HERTZ ADDITION PRATT & WHITNEY BUILDING SHORTFALL AVIATRON ADDITION SHORTFALL 2. 3. PRATT & WHITNEY BUILDING AVIATRON BUILDING $103,500 8,852 1,800 12,675 2,223 $129,050 11,375 10,947 TOTAL $151,372 I JOSEPH C McNEIL (1919-1978) JOSEPH E McNEIL JOHN T LEDDY NANCY GOSS SHEAHAN WILLIAM F ELLIS ',USAN GILFILLAN JOSEPH A FARNHAM JANET C MURNANF, KEVIN I COYLE* KIMBERLEE 1 STURTEVANT (*ALSO ADMITTED IN N Y) Mr. Ray Belair City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 LAW OFFICES A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION June 28, 1999 Re: Landscaping Agreement, City of South Burlington Dear Ray: 271 SOUTH ANION STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONf 05401 TELEPHONE (802) 863-4531 TELECOPIER (802) 863-1743 Accompanying is an original of the above -referenced Agreement. We have applied for, and are forwarding to The Howard Bank, payment for the actual Letter of Credit. Thank you for your time in this matter. Sin rel , Joseph I . Farnham, Esq. JAF/ah enclosure cc: John J. Hamilton (w/original) J. McLean, Esq. (no encl.) 10\1003\00001 belair landscape agr Itr 6-28-99 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802 660-2552 ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (JM CLLE @FIRMSSPF COM) JOSEPH S MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE (*ALSO ADMITTED IN N Y ) May 21, 1999 Joe Weith Director of Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Landscaping Letter of Credit Agreement; Burlington International Airport Dear Joe: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA Enclosed please find three (3) final copies of the Letter of Credit Agreement relative to the above. Please review; and if satisfactory forward all three copies to Chuck Hafter for signature. After Chuck has signed, please forward the executed copies to Amy Towle-Mailloux at the Howard Bank. Thank you. Sincerely, J98eph S . McLean JSM/bjl Enclosure Son4037.cor LANDSCAPING LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is executed in triplicate between the City of Burlington, Vermont (hereafter referred to as the "Developer"); The Howard Bank, N.A. of Burlington, Vermont (hereafter referred to as the "BANK"); and the City of South Burlington, Vermont (hereafter referred to as the "Municipality). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Developer has received site plan approval from the Municipality's Planning Commission for the development of property located at Burlington International Airport, South Burlington, Vermont (the "property"), as depicted on site plans entitled (1) "Burlington International Airport South Burlington, Vermont, As Built Tree and Shrub Planting Plan" prepared by Dunn Associates and dated October 16, 1997 (rev'd September 2, 1998); (2) "Burlington International Airport Aviatron Building Addition Site and Landscaping Plan `Record Drawing,"' prepared by Webster -Martin, Inc., Consulting Engineers, dated August 1997; (3) `Burlington International Airport Pratt and Whitney Building Site and Access Road Landscaping Plan," prepared by Webster -Martin, Inc., Consulting Engineers, dated August 1996; (4) "Hertz, Burlington International Airport, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Michael Dugan, dated December 3, 1991, last revised May 26, 1992; (5) `Burlington International Airport Maintenance Areas Proposed Sand/Dry Storage Building," prepared by Webster -Martin, Inc., Consulting Engineers, dated July 10, 1998; and (6) as discussed and agreed to by the Developer at the November 24, 1998, meeting of the South Burlington Planning Commission (and reflected in the minutes thereof), in conjunction with the application of HCA Airport Realty to construct a 1,600 sq. ft. addition to a 10,000 sq. ft. airplane hangar behind 3060 Williston Road (i.e., five (5) trees); and WHEREAS, the Developer is required by said approval, at its own expense, to complete landscaping of the property in accordance with the plan approved by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement wish to establish a mechanism to secure the obligations of the Developer for the work as set forth above; and WHEREAS, the Bank executes this Agreement solely in the capacity of issuer of a Letter of Credit as hereinafter specified; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above -stated premises and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: The Developer will, at its own expense, complete all of the landscaping depicted in accordance with the specifications set forth in said site plan and related documents. 2. The Developer shall complete the landscaping set forth in Paragraph 1 no later than three (3) years from the date of Developer's execution of this Agreement. 3. The Developer shall replace or repair any defective or improper landscaping work or materials identified by City's Administrative Officer, or his/her designee, within three (3) years after completion. 4. For the guarantee of the Developer's performance of all requirements herein and hereunder set forth, the Developer has caused the Bank to issue its Irrevocable Letter of Credit in favor of the Municipality, the original of which is attached to the Municipality's copy of this Agreement, and a copy of which is attached to the Developer's copy of this Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, the Developer shall cause the attached Letter of Credit to be renewed 2 annually and at least thirty (30) days before the maturity date thereof. Failure of the Developer to deliver evidence of such renewal satisfactory to the Municipality thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration of said Letter of Credit shall constitute a default of the terms of this Agreement, and shall give rise to certain rights of the Municipality, as described herein. 5. Payment of each draft under the Letter of Credit will be made at sight when presented to the Bank by the Municipality, the payment limited only by the maximum amount of the Letter of Credit. If the Developer shall be in default of the Agreement for seven (7) days because of its failure to provide evidence of renewal of the Letter of Credit, required in Paragraph 4 above, the Municipality shall notify the Developer by certified mail of said default. The Developer shall then, within three (3) business days, provide the Municipality with evidence of renewal of the Letter of Credit or the substitution therefore of a letter of credit of equal amount issued by a bank acceptable to the Municipality. If the Developer fails to secure either renewal of the Letter of Credit or the issuance of a substitute Letter of Credit satisfactory to the Municipality, the Municipality may notify the Bank of such default and request payment under said Letter of Credit. 6. The Developer and the Municipality hereby agree that the sum of One Hundred Fifty -Three Thousand and Eight Hundred Thirty -Seven Dollars ($153,837.00) shall be sufficient to secure the Developer's obligations under this Agreement, but shall not relieve the Developer from the obligation to pay any additional costs, if actual costs exceed the above -stated figure. 7. The Municipality will promptly submit to the Developer a copy of any draft it submits to the Bank. The consent of the Developer to payment of said draft by the Bank to the Municipality under said Letter of Credit is not required. 3 8. The Municipality shall not file with the Bank a Statement of Default unless it has provided Developer with at least sixty (60) days notice, by certified mail, of its intention to do SO. 9. All funds drawn on the Bank by the Municipality pursuant to the Letter of Credit shall be used solely by the Municipality for the purpose of completing landscaping of the property in accordance with the plans referenced in Page 1. Any work contracted for by the Municipality pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis, or shall be performed by the Municipality's own work force and equipment, or shall be accomplished in such other manner as in the judgment of the Municipality shall accomplish the work. 10. If payments are drawn on the Bank by the Municipality pursuant to said Letter of Credit, and it shall later develop that a portion of the monies drawn are in excess of the Municipality's needs, any such excess amount shall be returned by the Municipality to the Bank, to be credited by said Bank to the Developer. 11. This Agreement and said Letter of Credit shall terminate and shall be of no force and effect upon completion of the three (3) year warranty period as described in Paragraph 3, above. If the Municipality has not delivered any written notice to the Developer of any defective or improper work or materials in the landscaping within the thirty-six (36) month period, or if notice has been given and the defective work or materials have been corrected by the Developer, the Municipality shall forthwith notify the Bank in writing that the Letter of Credit may be canceled, and shall return the original Letter of Credit to the Bank, and both the Developer and the Bank shall be released from all obligations hereunder and under said Letter of Credit. El 12. The Bank may not modify the Letter of Credit without first receiving written consent of the Municipality. 13. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the Bank harmless from all claims, causes of action or liability of any kind arising out of this Agreement or the issuance by the Bank of this Letter of Credit, including attorney's fees, as long as the Bank follows the terms and conditions outlined in said Letter of Credit and this Agreement. 14. This Agreement shall be binding on all parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns. DATED at , Vermont, this _ day of 1999. IN THE PRESENCE OF: DEVELOPER CITY OF BURLINGTON, VERMONT BY: Witness Its Duly Authorized Agent Witness DATED at , Vermont, this _ day of , 1999. IN THE PRESENCE OF: BANK HOWARD BANK, N.A. BURLINGTON, VERMONT BY: Witness Its Duly Authorized Agent Witness 5 J DATED at , Vermont, this _ day of , 1999. IN THE PRESENCE OF: MUNICIPALITY CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Witness Witness 10/1003/00001 Landscaping Ltr of Credit 5-99 BY: ( ki Its Duly Authoriz d Agent ri C WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS* ECONOMISTS • PLANNERS 135 COLLEGE STREET . P.O. BOX 9412 • NEW HAVEN, CT 06534-0412 • (203) 865-2191 • FAX (203) 624-0484 April 12, 1999 Mr. Joe Weith City Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Weith: Enclosed please find the minutes of the March 25, 1999 Steering Committee meeting for the Burlington International Airport Parking Alternatives Study for your information and files. We are currently preparing the final version of Technical Report No. 2 and will distribute this in the near future. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES John M. Wilson, P.E. Senior Associate JMW/adj Enclosures ACCRA, GHANA • ALBANY, NY • ANAHEIM, CA • ATLANTA, GA • BALTIMORE, MD •BANGKOK, THAILAND • CARACAS, VENEZUELA•CHARLESTON, SC COLUMBIA, SC • COLUMBUS, OH • DES MOINES, IA • FALLS CHURCH, VA • HONG KONG • HOUSTON, TX • KUWAIT • KNOXVILLE, TN LEXINGTON, KY • LONDON, ENGLAND • MILWAUKEE, WI • NEW HAVEN, CT • ORLANDO, FL • PITTSBURGH, PA • RALEIGH, NC RICHMOND, VA • ROSELLE, IL • SAN FRANCISCO, CA • SAN JOSE, CA • TALLAHASSEE, FL • TAMPA, FL • TORONTO, CANADA • WASHINGTON, DC EMPLOYEE -OWNED COMPANY NOTES OF MEETING BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PARKING ALTERNATIVES STUDY STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING MARCH 25,1999 Present Peter Keating J.J. Hamilton R. A. McEwing Jason Owen Joe Weith Mike Wilson Transportation Planner, CCMPO Airport Manager, BIA Airport Engineer, BIA VAOT City Planner, South Burlington WSA The meeting opened at 10:00 A.M. in the CCMPO Offices. Peter Keating noted that Technical Report No. 2 had been distributed in advance and asked Mike Wilson to present it. Mike stated that the purpose of the report was to focus on alternative parking strategies for further consideration. He quickly summarized the report, including: ■ Review of anticipated parking demand; ■ Strategies considered in initial screening; ■ Advantages and disadvantages of each strategy; ■ Current developments relevant to the strategies; and, ■ Recommendations of strategies for further development. The strategies had been grouped into three categories: "No Further Consideration", "Potential Consideration" and "Strong Consideration". Questions and comments were then invited. Peter advised that there had been an update in the status of the VAOT Park and Ride Lot at Exit 12 near Taft's Corner and that this lot was now on the priority list for early implementation. Joe Weith initiated a discussion of on -site parking expansion at the airport by asking why this was not recommended for further consideration. After discussion, a consensus was reached that this alternative should be placed in the "Strong Consideration" category. A discussion of off -airport parking sites also occurred. Possible locations mentioned were behind the Sheraton at Exit 14 of Interstate 89, at the South Burlington Municipal Landfill near the airport, and the former Digital Equipment property on Kimball Avenue. It was noted that remote parking areas are most likely to be successful if their locations and operations are as user-friendly as possible, take account of the origins of people's trips to the airport, and have good security. CCTA service to the airport was also discussed. It was noted that previous subsidies of the University Mall/Airport Route had not been very successful, with ridership levels returning to normal over the year following discontinuation of the subsidy. The route to the airport was very 1 indirect, traveling to the University Mall and South Burlington Middle and High Schools before arriving at the airport. It was noted that the KFH Study is in process of recommending a restructuring of the CCTA service. A trunk line is proposed for Route 2 and this may allow for more direct service to the airport. The implications of this change for a transit -based access strategy were discussed. It was pointed out that, even with more direct service, the buses will not provide door to door service and may not accommodate luggage. A consensus was reached that this strategy would be moved from the category "No Further Consideration" to "Potential Consideration". There was also some discussion about Parking Demand Management. It was acknowledged that this approach would have limited effectiveness as an independent strategy, but might be considered in combination with other strategies. In response to a question from Peter Keating, Mike Wilson indicated that Technical Report No. 2 would be published in final form with these changes. The remaining work tasks and schedule were discussed. The two major work items remaining are additional public outreach, as determined by the Steering Committee, and preparation of the final report with recommendations. The final report was to identify in general terms the costs, benefits and implementation steps of the strategies in the "Strong Consideration' category and set the stage for further development efforts to be undertaken by others. The committee decided that the public meeting was to provide input and feedback concerning preferred strategies, and should therefore occur as soon as possible. The dates of April 141h or 15' were proposed, depending on availability of venue. (Post -meeting note: the meeting was confirmed for the evening of April 14 at South Burlington City Hall.) CCMPO will distribute notices of the meeting to appropriate officials and groups. It was agreed that WSA would submit the Draft Final Report in mid -May.