Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDR-01-04 - Decision - 0023 San Remo Drive#DR-01-04 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Re: Findings of Fact, design review application #DR-01-04 of Mostafa Daovdi to amend a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2) six (6) dwelling units. The amendment consists of adding two(2) satellite dishes to the exterior facade, 23 San Remo Drive. On the 5th of June 2001, the South Burlington Development Review Board approved the design review application of Mostafa Daovdi, under Section 24.1 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations based on the following findings: 1. This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2) six (6) dwelling units. The amendment consists of adding two (2) satellite dishes to the exterior facade, 23 San Remo Drive. 2. The owner of record is Four Boys, LLC. 3. The Committee was made aware that there was an illegal satellite dish installed on the east facade of the building. The applicant wished to install a second dish in an unknown location. 4. Consistent Design: The consistent design criteria of Section 24.40 of the Zoning Regulations states that "building design shall promote consistent organization of major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design". It was staff s recommendation that if the Committee should permit satellite dishes within the Design Review Districts, these dishes should be treated similarly to other equipment or utilities and incorporated into the design of the building through roof decks or cupolas or otherwise concealed from view. 5. Roof as a Design Element/ Conceal Roof Top Devices: It was unknown if the satellite dish will be added to the roofline or to the facade of the building. There are currently no roof top devices present on the building. Staff recommend that if a dish is added to the roof top, a roof deck or cupola be added to screen the dish. DECISION AND CONDITIONS Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Development Review Board approves the design review application #DR-01-04 of Mostafa Daovdi to amend a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2) six (6) dwelling units. The amendment consists of adding two (2) satellite dishes to the exterior facade, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled "23 San Remo Drive", with a stamped received date of 5111/01 with the following stipulations: This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 2. Prior to obtaining a certificate of occupancy the plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below: A) The proposed satellite dishes shall be located on the south facade or on the roofline, no higher than the peak of the roof approximate to the southwest corner of the building. 3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the second satellite dish. 5. Any change to the plans shall require review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee. hair or Clerk Date South Burlington Development Review Board Please Note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental Court, pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4471 and V.R. C.P. 76, in writing, within 30 days of the date this decision is issued The fee is $150.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long. You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4472(d) (exclusivity of remedy; finality).