The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDR-11-07 SP-11-29 - Decision - 0023 San Remo DriveCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION #DR-11-07 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-11-29 FOUR BOYS LLC — 23 SAN REMO DRIVE FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Four Boys LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval for changes to a dumpster enclosure at a property located in Central District 2, 23 San Remo Drive. The applicant is also seeking site plan review to expand a dumpster enclosure from 10' X 12' to 12' X 12' at a property located in Central District 2, 23 San Remo Drive. The Development Review Board held a public meeting on September 6 and September 20, 2011. Michael Dee represented the applicant. The subject property falls within Design District 2 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D)(1)(d) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the addition or alteration of the roofline of a building or structure shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant is seeking design review approval for changes to a dumpster enclosure, 23 San Remo Drive. 2. The property is located in the Central District 2 (CD2) zoning district. 3. The owner of record of the subject property is Four Boys LLC. 4. The application was received on July 22, 2011. 5. The applicant has submitted a plan entitled "23 San Remo Four Boys LLC 23 San Remo Drive South Burlington VT" prepared by Ground Swell Architects, dated 9/8/04, as well as color photographs of the proposed structure. DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA Design plans for properties within Design District 2 shall comply with the following design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.01(F) of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. The design of a building should consider the design features of other structures in the area so as not to be harshly discordant with other nearby buildings. CADocuments and Settings\Mark C. Behr\My Documents\South Burlington DRB\9.20.11 Meeting Decisions\DR_11 _07&SP_11_29_23SanRemo_FourBoysLLC_ffd.doc (b) Materials used. A wide variety of both natural and high quality man-made materials are allowed. Examples of acceptable materials include red brick, indigenous stone (i.e., granite, limestone, and marble), architectural concrete, synthetic stucco, wood clapboard (synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles), and glass or glass block. (c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. For sides of buildings that face or front public streets, the majority of the first floor's facade area shall consist of see - through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity, however, the windows and doors should be of human scale, so as to welcome pedestrians. (e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. Only a small portion of roof area may be flat provided it is not visible from the public street, existing or planned, or does not detract from the overall design and harmony of the building. Where portions of a roof are flat, architectural elements such as cornices and parapets shall be included to improve the appearance and provide interest. Large, low -slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are discouraged. (f) Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns. New buildings shall be built to the street property line. For existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building better to the public street. Such improvements could include installation of doors and windows facing the public street. (g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. (h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. (i) Pedestrian promenade along Market Street. These criteria are not applicable to the subject application. The proposed expansion of the previously approved dumpster enclosure is minimal. The CADocuments and Settings\Mark C. Behr\My Documents\South Burlington DRB\9.20.11 Meeting Decisions\DR_11 _07&SP_11 _29_23SanRemo_FourBoysLLC_ffd.doc 2 existing fence is wood and easily falls into disrepair from weather, snow plow damage, and age. The proposed structure is fully enclosed and appears more of a structure than an attempt to surround a dumpster. It has a garage type roll -up door, louvered vents above the door and on the back side. The walls are wood panel, with black shingled roof. The proposed trash enclosure will compliment the existing building. DECISION Motion by Joseph Randazzo, seconded by Roger Farley, to approve Site Plan Application #SP-11-29 and Design Review Application #DR-11-07 of Four Boys LLC subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in full effect. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the plans submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3. The new solid waste storage building shall rest on the ground such that there will be no openings underneath the structure. 3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy prior to use of the dumpster enclosure. 5. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. Tim Barritt— yea/nay/abstain/not present Mark Behr — yea/nay/abstain/not present Matthew Birmingham — yea/nay/abstain/not present Roger Farley — yea/nay/abstain/not present Joe Randazzo— yea/nay/abstain/not present Michael Sirotkin — yea/nay/abstain/not present Bill Stuono — yea/nay/abstain/not present Motion carried by a vote of 5 — 0 — 0 Signed this 23rd day of September 2011, by Digitally signed by Mark C. Behr Mark C. Behr Architect ite Mark C. Behr, o=Richard Henry Behr Archi[ea P.C., ou, email=mark@rhbpc.com, c=US Date: 2011.09.23 09:19:18-04'00' Mark Behr, Chairman CADocuments and Settings\Mark C. Behr\My Documents\South Burlington DRB\9.20.11 Meeting Decisions\DR_11 _07&SP_11_29_23SanRemo_FourBoysLLC_ffd.doc Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior Court, Environmental Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be mailed to the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4)(A). Please contact the Environmental Division at 802-828-1660 or http://vermontiudiciary.org/GTC/environmental/default.aspx for more information on filing requirements, deadlines, fees and mailing address. The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call 802.879.5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. CADocuments and Settings\Mark C. Behr\My Documents\South Burlington DRB\9.20.11 Meeting Decisions\DR_11_07&SP_11_29_23SanRemo_FourBoysLLC_ffd.doc