Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-87-0000 - Decision - 0001 Ruth Street.BOUT YUH LiNGTON ZONING BOAC D U`.^' ).1 Findings in accordance with Section 1446P of the Plrrnnin" `% 1) vclo.)n Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (--j (3) That such unnecessary hardship has no-Z been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the aopropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 19 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal Date It13d`87 Appellant E61.44 C,402eAU Vote: Yes No List : ind n,, , below: / 1 . i� Ly � r v✓� C, d'1-o2 (S l . �, � �i4 t�GK�4 ----- — - 2._1%/4X r/�117_�Dve� 3 . �1 0 1,7 a-o J 6A L -,— c GOUT 13UH LINGTON ZONING BoAi.1) OF Pi USTX .::T Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planninc, "I Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unn©cessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property;11 j-j (3) That such unnecessary hardship has no.11t____blleen created by the appellant; 11 (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. L Appeal # I c� /'--- ch-7 Date / 13d Z�--- -7 AppellantP�&&AV�L- Vote: Yes No Sign__ Li 1. 2. 3. Vote: Yes List findings 2. 3. S0UT 13UH LING'TON ZONING BOA*' D OF PJ US'i': _.:�'l' Find.ngs in accordance with Section 4-46i of the Planning 'r De vclopment Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located;-, (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property;11 (`j (3) That such unnecessary hardship has no-t been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and ( \T (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal Date Appellant S i , n j; El below:�..� f SUUT �UN. LINGTON ZONING ISOAi:U OF PJ Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning N, Dc,vclopcnont. Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, Including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property Is located; F 14� (2) That because of such physical *circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (d (3) That such unnecessary hardship has no.Z been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and [ J/ (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. f�p Appeal # Date • Appellant Vote : , v s No Si�;nv`���V' — �eQ I� List below: � 1. 2. _ b y' % le - 3. GOUT 13UH LINGTON ZONING BOA111) UF U.l ^indings in accordance with Section 10+6A of the Planninl; ", Deve1opinont Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical 'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has no-t been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and L-T (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal / Date 4 1/ Appellant ! Vote: Yes No Q Sign List :'indings below: 1.QS �JGI/ sTii�/ty t rrL.aT«ns --- - 3. �0W; J3UH LINGTON ZOIJ ING BOA ' U`.' UJ Findings in accordance with Section 446E of the Plannim', ., Dovelopinont Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions) } including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size g or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning,, regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the propertyr is located;El (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zonipg regulations and that. to w the authorization of a variance is there -,Ore necessary enable the reasonable use of the property;Or ,, (3) That such unnecessary hardship has no-Z been created by the appellant; n z (4) That the varliialnce, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent operty, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. a Date Af Appellant / vote: Yes No p List findini�s below: 1. 3. Appeal S 1 n F; • 5