Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP-07-72 - Decision - 0097 Royal Drive#SP-07-72 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING DORSET STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC - 97 ROYAL DRIVE SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-07-72 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Dorset Street Associates, LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking site plan approval to convert 672 sq. ft. of a single family dwelling to an accessory residential unit, 97 Royal Drive. The Development Review Board held a public meeting on Tuesday, November 6, 2007. Paul O'Leary represented the applicant. Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant is seeking site plan approval to convert 672 sq. ft. of a single family dwelling to an accessory residential unit, 97 Royal Drive. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is Dorset Street Associates, LLC. 3. The subject property is located in the Southeast Quadrant (SEQ) Zoning District. 4. The plan submitted is entitled, "The Cider Mill Lot #42 Site Plan Amendment", prepared by O'Leary -Burke Civil Associates, PLC, dated 9/21/07. ACCESSORYRESIDENTIAL UNITS Pursuant to Section 3.10(E)(1) of the proposed Land Development Regulations, in any district where a single-family residence is a principal permitted use, one (1) accessory residential unit within or attached to a primary single-family residence or within an existing, permitted accessory structure may be permitted by the DRB in accordance with Article 14, Site Plan Review, and the following additional criteria: (a) Floor space of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed thirty percent (30516) of the total habitable area of the single-family dwelling unit. The single family dwelling unit is 3278 SF. to be 672 SF, or 20.5% of the habitable applicant is in compliance with this criterion. The accessory residential unit is proposed area of the principal dwelling. Thus, the (b) The principal dwelling shall be owner occupied. - 1 - #S P-07-72 The property owner is aware of this restriction. (c) Adequate wastewater capacity is available to service the accessory unit, as demonstrated by the issuance of a Wastewater Allocation or on -site wastewater permit pursuant to the South Burlington Sewage Ordinance. If necessary, the applicant shall apply for wastewater allocation from Juli Beth Hinds, Director of Planning and Zoning. (d) Two additional off-street parking spaces shall be provided on the same lot, either in a garage or a driveway, or not in any areas required to meet coverage limitations, or any front yard other than a driveway, required by these Regulations. The site includes adequate room for two vehicles in the garage and two spaces in the driveway. This is sufficient to satisfy this requirement. (e) A zoning permit shall be required for the accessory residential unit. 3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit from the Administrative Officer for the accessory residential unit. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. There is adequate consideration given to pedestrian movement and parking on the site. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. Parking is to the front and side of the building. However, given that the nature of the project as a single-family residential use, this layout is acceptable and in harmony with the rest of the neighborhood. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The home has not yet been constructed. The administrative officer shall ensure that this criterion is being met when issuing the zoning permit for the house. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. -2- #S P-07-72 The applicant has not proposed any lighting as part of this application (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. This criterion was assessed when the subdivision to which it is part was considered and approved. (f7 Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. This criterion was assessed when the subdivision to which it is part was considered and approved. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. It is not necessary to require any additional access easements as part of the proposed project. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). As the subject building is a single family residence, the Board understands that trash will be maintained inside the building until time for trash pickup. Traffic This project will not generate a sufficient amount of traffic to warrant concern or further review. -3- #SP-07-72 DECISION Motion by ! u/M/ seconded by to approve Site Plari Application #S -07-72 of Dorset Street Associates, LLC subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations, which are not superseded by this approval, shall remain in effect. 2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plans submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3. The principal dwelling shall remain owner -occupied. 4. If necessary, the applicant shall obtain wastewater allocation approval from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hinds, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 5. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 17.04 of the Land Development Regulations or this approval is null and void. 6. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board or the Administrative Officer. Mark Behr — ye/nay/abstain/not present Matthew Birmingh —Ceonay/abstain/not present John Dinklage — e nay abstain/not present Roger Farley — y nay/abstain/not present Eric Knudsen — e nay/abstain/not present Peter Plumeau — nay/abstain/not present Gayle Quimby — e nay/abstain/not present Motion carried by a vote of i Signed this day of ' `f 2007, by John Dinklage, Chair Please note: You Have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRCP 76 in writing, within 30 days of the date this decision is issued. The fee is $225.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long. You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy; finality). BEIM