HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0733 Queen City Park Roade�
4PTI-11IR5 PARI</A/q
rcV/stogy,
t go I
C
• • . • r !� 4ft
' 1 r
r
r
ARTAIUA
4
"7t
f
V
=lA)2KJA1Q
MEMORANDUM
TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COraISSION
ZROM: RICHARD WARD, ZONING ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
RE: CONIYENTS REGARDING TEE PROPOSED RESTAURANT AT DECORATIVE; TELINGS
DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 1974
Use allowed: This area is zoned BR District, therefore the
use is allowed under Section 7.004 (h).
The building is presently a nonconforming structure because
of it's set back. The require set-U,ack_ i _7j5''__the existing
set back is 141.
Section 13.00 (2) allows for the alteration, however this
alteration can't exceed�25%a of the fair market value."" The
City has a fair market value of the buildinT of �'24,575• It
is my understanding that the proposed alterations to the
building will be an 8' x 20' addition to the east side
which is for additional rest rooms and a new entrance also on the
east side. The front entrance is going to be closed.
Based on information from the developer this alteration will
not exceed 25', of the Fair Yarket Value and is less than
8"6,000.00, therefore the proposal will be in onformance
with Section 13.00.7v.Sia1
Parking: The existing parking lot to the east will be
altered to allow for 13 spaces. I feel that the maneuvering
area between the spaces is not ample. The print shows 23
feet, 40 feet is recommended. My recommendation is to
eliminate the spaces numbered 10 thru 13. These are not
required spaces. The required spaces would be 22. The area
should be a buffer strip.
Off -Street Parking: Section 13.40 allowed for parking spaces
to be located on other property. This plan proposed to have
parking on other property. In order to direct people to these
spaces I would recommend that the spaces be striped and that
a directional sign be erected in accordance with the
provisions of the Sign Regulations.
Plantings & Screening: The proposed new plantings as shown
on the plan are 6-9 maple or crab-apple trees. Use 3% of
$6,000.00 and this would require $180.00 in landscaping. Nine
trees will be in that price range.
The screening proposed is a stockade fence along the easterly
property line. This fence along with the existing vegetation
is adequate screening for the residential area to the east of
this property.
Page 2
A performance bond should be posted in the amount of $1,000.00
to cover the landscaping; as proposed. This includes the new
sidewalk and grass area directly in front of the building along
with the 6 to 9 trees and the stockade fence.
Richard Ward
Zoning Administrative Officer
V(.
i • i.,�- ..�. �:_ ,m•-�I.` ^IC1Y !n-. li~_ C'- 7..J
2. BONDING OR ESCRO'i AGREEMENTS
L :1,DSC�.�ITuG
ER• .. li-J
�m,RM, DR ..11"4r1GE
�;D J
• rTTR�
r•-- - ,TVC
- - C:7,,,7 J.T * —TT I
_,T �
�r ,-;mTC.iT n-, TITLE X
_,r C I-y ST E ITS .6 CCEPTED
TT T ' RO--,D C r-GRE'2 r•r+„ITm
COPI Jn.=IGT.uD. III: D 0 ?E!'CF r-;D
.i1 u
- -- RE Cr-RD--- D
FILED
-„ Z, r, T- -'--T NG
F r, , T ,ti CC
CC[IC�C
-r nn^mac - -*gym
1C. n rTT^, m, l `� r ^VGu TT* )!,: nm T TT\'unl
:ID/T)Tr,
rTTTT i IT;r, pJRT:iIT
n-, I r C TT p T D r`_ �r rIm TT
.... 1. �':-_D _.1��tJL :mI�P�Y ., a :.�. .v t •. __.. i:.l
Lucjust 2, 1974
i•ir. Clark hinacidlo, Jr.
East Charlotte, Vermont 05445
Re: Queen City Park Road
Lear Clark: t
In reference to the parcel of land which you
purchased Zrom the city on Queen City Park Road, the
street R.0.14. is approximately 1 foot south of the power
pole and continues concentric with the paved street.
Tae records uo not detail the radius of the curve so
the radius of the existing street will have to be used
if the entire R.O.W. is to be staked out. I do not
believe this is critical because the land across the
street is public land.
The entrance to the parcel is satisfactory. Placing
it further westerly decreases the sight distance to the
west.
WJS/h
Very truly yours,
William J. Szymanski
City Manager
t
B
/o OKOi
0
City of South Burlington
1175 WILLISTON ROAD
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
i TEL.863.2891
September 27, 1974
Mr. Clark Hinsdale, Jr.
East Charlotte
Vermont 05445
re: Arthurs Parkin; Lot
Dear Clark,
Please excuse my delay in outlinin- the find-
ings of facts by the Planning Commission with re-
spect to your approved request for a parking lot
adjacent to Queen City Park Road. The Commission
established the following at its September 10, 19%4
meetins:
P•Tr. Power moved. that the PlanninC Commission
approves the site Man review for "Arthur's Inc. park-
in- lot as limited by the memorandum to the Planning
Commission from Fred Mitchell dated September 10, 19741
with the following changes: that the easterly drive-
way be designated Entrance Only; that it be on the
westerly side of the pole opposite parking space label-
ed #18, and that it be 24 feet wide which may than` e the
barrier on the map; that the westerly entrance be des-
ignated Entrance and Exit, and the barrier to the east-
erl-IT side of parking space �18 be extended to the en-
trance to the public parking area; secondly, that in the
parking area, the number of spaces for the capacity of the
restaurant be figured at 28 delineated spaces in the upper
lot, and 19 spaces in the lower lot, and an additional
5 spaces undelineated on the -raveled portion of the upper
lot; third, that the proper a-reement between Mr. Hinsdale
and Green Mountain Power Corp. concerning; the safe re-
location of the Zuy wires for the telephone pole be filed
with the City Planner; and fotrth, that a proper bond
of intent for landscaping and parking area be posted, that
five trees should be flowering crabs; and fifth, item B
is to be eliminated from Mr. Mitchell's requirement; and
sixth, that a fence be erected adjacent to the Queen City
Park Road and the entrance to the upper parking lot.
Motion seconded by Mr. Levesque.
Voted unanimously for approval.
In thanking the Planning Commission, .fir. Hinsdale commented
it will be a better parking lot because of the thouCht put
into it.
If you have any questions refTarding the implementa-
tion of these finding please dive me a call.
Respectfully,
Fred Mitchell_,
City Planner
To: Planning Commission
From: Fred Mitchell
re: Arthur's Parking Lot
Date: September 10, 1974
In a review of this proposal the following observations
were noted:
1) There now exists 28 marked parking spaces and approx-
imately 10 unmarked spaces adjacent to the existing
structure.
2) It is assumed that additional parking, when needed,
is accomplished by utilizing the gravel portion below
the structure and/or within the parking lot provided
by the shopping center.
3) Within the zoning district the use of the structure
presently is the most intense with respect to need-
ed parking requirements.
4) The traffic generated from this use should cause no
undue congestion, especially in view of the evening
hours of operation and the potential for high inten-
sity of use, especially on Friday and Saturday nights.
5) No restrictions have been noted on the liquor license.
I would recommend the following for the parking lot con-
struction:
A) Developer to establish a barrier on the south side
sufficient enough to retain any slippage of gravel
from the existing slope and to delineate the extent
of parking.
B) Developer to establish a barrier on the north side
for any parking spaces established.
C) Developer to establish a fence, preferable open and
wooden as shown on the accompying map.
D) 0n the west side developer to establish a barrier
only in the areas where he cuts into existing bank
to establish parking area. Developer relates that
remainder of this side will be utilized for storage
of plowed snow during the winter and additional
barrier could prove hazardeous to snow removal oper-
ation.
-2-
E) Developer should landscape the buffer zone on the
north side with five (5) trees suitable -to the plan-
ning commission and will plant grass that will extend
to his property line. Fence posts where used, should
set back approximiately 3 feet from the edge of the
grass.
F) Parking lot layout should be established as shown on
the accompying map.
G) The marking of parking spaces could be established as
follows:
On the south side a strip of paint should be used to
delineate each parking space;
Cn the west.this same procedure should be used where
a barrier is established, when no barrier is used,
marking stakes centered on each parking space should
be used;
On the north if any spaces are established they should
be marked with a stake also.
No Text