Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-83-0000 - Supplemental - 0002 Prouty ParkwayDecember 19, 1983 mx . William I ovett RFD #1, P.O. Box 237 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Dear rs. Lovett: Be advised that the Zoning Boars? of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Tuesday, January 3, 190 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your recxiest for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer ter/mcg SOUTH �ELINGTON 'ZONING BOARD Or . IUSTIMEENT �,indings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; El (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (1 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; r-I (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to t'[ie public welfare; and r(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date 3-- d Anpellant Vote: Yes Q No Tom(" List findings below: 2. Appeal # -2- Sig SOUTH )RLINGTON ZONING BOAi:D Or ._-JUSTM::NT ?indings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; E, (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of -adjacent property, nor be ` detrimental to the public welfare; and El P(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # `j Date , 3 Appellant Vote: Yes Q No List findings below: 1. 2. 3 SOUT1 �'ELINGTON CONING BOA -,,,.I) Or ._)JUSTy;::NT ?indings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b;, the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; Ell (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; I Li (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be ` detrimental to tiie public welfare; and 0 r(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date — Vote: Yes Q No Sign List findines below: 1. 2. 3 SOUTI )URLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF IUSDENT _'indings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; j; ,� (2) That because �"of, such physical circumstances or conditions,'there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; Li (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be ` detrimental to tr,e public welfare; and jam[, .r(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date / --�?— k- I Anpellant /—/)�ryf���% 4e/ `a1/e�lr_ Vote: Yes Q No 1 List findings below: 7 Appeal # _3 Sign1-> •�-. No Text TO: South Burlington Zoning Board We, as area residents or home owners, by virtue of this petition, express our opposition to the request of Dr. Lovett for a zoning variance so that he may use property located at 2 Prouty Parkway as a dental office. Our objections are as follows: 1: Proximity of the property entrance (50 feet)to a state highway; 2: Proximity of the property entrance (50 feet) to the city bus stop used by elderly residents and the handicapped; 3: Proximity of the property entrance (50 feet) to the school bus stop for elementary school children; 4: The promotion of a residential area into becoming commercial; 5: This office would be in a home not used as a prii�iary residence by the owner; 6: There is no advantage to the city in terms of revenue; 7: A paved parking lot is not in keeping with the appearance or uses of a residential community; 8: Two variances for business in the area were turned down recently -- one within a couple of hundred feet of this location -- on the recommendation of the Zoning Board 9: This request favors one individual to the detriment of many 10: The residential design of this community is being "squeezed" sufficiently; 11: There are other nearby properties available (such as the office condominium units) which would be more apropos. 1.2: Existing covenants proscribe this area as residential. NAME iV '� ADDRESS /` TO: South Burlington Zoning Board We, as area residents or home owners, by virtue of this petition, express our opposition to the request of Dr. Lovett for a zoning variance so that he may use property located at 2 Prouty Parkway as a dental office. Our objections are as follows: 1: Proximity of the property entrance (50 feet)to a state highway; 2: Proximity of the property entrance (50 feet) to the city bus stop used by elderly residents and the handicapped; 3: Proximity of the property entrance (50 feet) to the school bus stop for elementary school children; 4: The promotion of a residential area into becoming commercial; 5: This office would be in a home not used as a pririary residence by the owner; 6: There is no advantage to the city in terms of revenue; 7: A paved parking lot is not in keeping with the appearance or uses of a residential community; 8: Two variances for business in the area were turned down recently -- one within a couple of hundred feet of this location -- on the recommendation of the Zoning Board 9: This request favors one individual to the detriment of many 10: The residential design of this community is being "squeezed" sufficiently; 11: There are other nearby properties available (such as the office condominium units) which would be more apropos. 1.2: Existing covenants proscribe this area as residential. NAME ADDRESS TO: South Burlington Zoning Board We, as area residents or home owners, by virtue of this petition, express our opposition to the request of Dr. Lovett for a zoning variance so that he may use property located at 2 Prouty Parkway as a dental office. Our objections are as follows: 1: Proximity of the property entrance (50 feet)to a state highway; 2: Proximity of the property entrance (50 feet) to the city bus stop used by elderly residents and the handicapped; 3: Proximity of the property entrance (50 feet) to the school bus stop for elementary school children; 4: The promotion of a residential area into becoming commercial; 5: This office would be in a home not used as a prir:iary residence by the owner; 6: There is no advantage to the city in terms of revenue; 7: A paved parking lot is not in keeping with the appearance or uses of a residential community; 8: Two variances for business in the area were turned down recently -- one within a couple of hundred feet of this location -- on the recommendation of the Zoning Board 9: This request favors one individual to the detriment of many 10: The residential design of this community is being "squeezed" sufficiently; 11: There are other nearby properties available (such as the office condominium units) which would be more apropos. 1.2: Existing covenants proscribe this area as residential. NAME ADDRESS ja 7 Gc)�o� / �/ ,�r�ati 11167 etaasc �.J � uJi�� o rJ T O ,�Ou)r� uJGI Gd J- � OrK/G/!'d J h d dL -e4-21� ' �, v Si4n�� o >9 D v .f TO: South Burlington Zoning Board We, as area residents or home owners, by virtue of this petition, express our opposition to the request of Dr. Lovett for a zoning variance so that he may use property located at 2 Prouty Parkway as a dental office. Our objections are as follows: 1: Proximity of the property entrance (50 feet)to a state highway; 2: Proximity of the property entrance (50 feet) to the city bus stop used by elderly residents and the handicapped; 3: Proximity of the property entrance (50 feet) to the school bus stop for elementary school children; 4: The promotion of a residential area into becoming commercial; 5: This office would be in a home not used as a primary residence by the owner; 6: There is no advantage to the city in terms of revenue; 7: A paved parking lot is not in keeping with the appearance or uses of a residential community; 8: Two variances for business in the area were turned down recently -- one within a couple of hundred feet of this location -- on the recommendation of the Toning Board 9: This request favors one individual to the detriment of many 10: The residential design of this community is being "squeezed" sufficiently; 11: There are other nearby properties available (such as the office condominium units) which would be more apropos. 1.2: Existing covenants proscribe this area as residential. NAME ADDRESS l e RECEIVED oF-c,A 1983 MANAGER'S OFFICE BuRpNGTON ov xj 'lea &4 No Text MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment From: William Szymanski, City Manager Re: Appeal Appeal No. 3 Dumont -Lovett variance for 2 Prouty Parkway Date: 12/23/83 At the December 19, 1983 City Council meeting concerns was expressed over the granting of a variance for the above referenced property. This property is located in a residential area of relatively new single family houses and granting of a variance would alter the character of the area and en- courage further variance requests. It is located at the intersection with Hines- burg Road which carries a high volume of traffic. It would require additional parking close to this intersection resulting in unsafe conditions. It is therefore requested that the Board deny this request. SOIJTh -, WLINGTON ZONING Nona In accordance with the South Buding ton Zoning R. motions and Xapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a wlc hearing at the South Bur. lington Municipal Offices, Con- ference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, Januory 3, 1984, at 55:00 P.M. to consider the follow- OFAppeal of San Remo Realty ComQany, Mr. Douolas Schner ssekmg a variance, Flom Section 19.65, Mu:lfiple uses and Section 19.05 Concktiorwl use extension of the South Burlington Regula- tions. Rest is for permission to construct a 56 h, x 121 h, stor- age building in conj mction with existing storage and mointe- nonce buildings, at 72 San Remo Drive. 02 Appeal of Grant Brossem seeking approval, from Section 13.20, Conditional uses subsec- tion 13.208 Recreational facili- ties of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for per- mission to construct a water amusement pork on a parcel of land containing 3.7 acres, lo- cated on lots I 6 2 Gregory Drive. 03 Appeal of Mary Dumont, Wil- liam Lovett agent seeking a vari- ance, from Section 9.10, Permitted uses and Sects 19.65 Multiple uses of the South Burlington RepulatiomL Request is for permission to operate o den- tal office, conbirrrp approxi- mately 1000 square foN in contunction with a single family dwell", at 2 Prouty Parkway. #4 Appeal of R. Federick Nye seeking a variance, from Section 18.00, Dimensional requirements of the South B rfinglon Regula- tions. Request .s for pemr�awn ro construct a 24 ft. x 42 h. .away over an existing pump island, toN+m wi151 het of the required front yard, at 1800 Williston Road. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer December 17, 1983 REPUBLIC STEEL CORPORATION STORAGE PRODUCTS DIVISION e'la 7r jr 2- '00644"l.1t.o Z= 4 ��+ zG MPC SYSTEM MAXI-STOR MONDRIAN LOCKERS Trademarks Of REPUBLIC STEEL CORPORATION 4�0.004 , Alt4�� �2 STOCKED AND DISTRIBUTED BY: INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SUPPLY 580 New Park Ave. West Hartford, Cf. 06101 PHONE: (203) 233-9881 r � NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Name, address and telephone # of applicant ` � '�-f• �fC'Uc� .` Name, address of property owner 'loe;,z L� Property location and description I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Hearing Date ignature of ppella Do not write below this line ---------------------------=----------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on at (day of week) (month and date) time to consider the following:0 el Appeal �•�i.s- PP o f Y seekingS.a .--�..•- , r from Section .-1 s of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to 0Z e. e. i ,.iG..IVf Ham'%' { 14VIV 40 Ply. M ' 17