Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-80-0000 - Supplemental - 0016 Prouty Parkway (2)JARRFIT 16 Prouty Parkway Area zoned R-4 District Section 6.10 Conditional uses - sub -section 6.107 Day care facilities Approval required by the Board of Adjustment under Section 13.10 Proposed is a parent's cooperative day care facility for six (6) children 1-3 years of age (see letter`regarding request from Jay Ashman). SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will mold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday , July 14, 1980 , at 5:00 p.m. to consider the (day of week) (rdonth and date) (time) following: Appeal of Glenn A. Jarrett seeking a conditional use, , from Section 6.10 , Day Care facilities (sub section 6.107) of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to operate a day care facility for six (6) pre-school children from a single family dwelling unit, located at 16 Prouty Parkway. SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTIENT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or. exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property =- is located; j (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoninc regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necess_ry to enable the reasonable use of the property; 0 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential` character of _the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently im.-Dair th;e aY,DrcDrizte use or development of adjacent property, nor le detrimental to tie public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will reeDresent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the Dla_r., Appeal n Date nDDellant Vote: Yes . No Si g n �— Q List findings below: 2. 3- f � SOUTH BLMLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 1+1+6F of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or, exceptional topographical -or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; LJ (2) That because of such physical circu�-.stances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity. with the provisions of the zoninc regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; tJ (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential cha—acter of .the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or Der-manently i�,Dair the a.,nrcDriate use or development of adjacent:property, nor be detrimental to t�:e public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the Dla_n. Appeal 1' Date nnpellant Vote: Yes Q No Sign List findings below: 1. ri *,Lia 1= ti l y 6yo CCo2 P 2. 3. i SOUTH BLT ..LINGTON ZONING BOA%D OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrourness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or -..exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zon;ng regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located;` (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity Frith the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property ; Evr (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential- character of _the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or Dermanently iMDair tie a,rDr=iate use or development of adjacent, property , nor be detrimental to t o public welfare; and Q' (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and wi.31 represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the ol�n. Appeal 7r / Da to ADaellant _ f Vote: Yes Q No r" Sign List findings below: _wL.7 4 k r .. -(i® 4 �a�t.c . , 3- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUMENT Findings in accordance with Section 1+1+68 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or..exceptional topographical -or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zor_;ng regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 1l (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoninc regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; D (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appell art; (4) That the varLi—alnce, i ' authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the rroperty is located, nor substantially or permanently im-pair the a,,nrcpriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to t'-e public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. } / - t Appeal � Date Anpellant ` Coor Vote: Yes � No Sign List findings below: tN QAL , 2. 3- No Text State of Vermont M Commissioner's Office Alcohol and Drug Abuse Division Division of Services for the Blind and Visually Handicapped .op. Social Services Division Vocational Rehabilitation Division Disability Determination Unit DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND REHABILITATION SERVICES AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Main Office: Osgood Building Vermont State Hospital Waterbury, Vermont 05676 'k� g, 19 �-o cf UC,,0-"4- L�, �-� `Vs Mailing Address: Q je DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND REHABILITATION SERVICES, State Office Building, Montpelier, Vermont 05602 Telephone --- 802-244-5181 No Text 111 6 N 141 411 ieLLA 77xk,61� 4 FIocr Plan c- c..rtc.,-4 b� -Cc( Ga) co-rt. doo�� Ste racc. (1 I/P sl"f� I It if /y] 411, Jay I. Ashman 139 Robinson Parkway Burlington, Vermont 05401 July 8, 1980 Mr. Richard Ward South Burlington Zoning Administrator. South Burlington City Offices 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Ward: In support of Glenn Jarrett's application for a conditional use permit, enclosed please find: (1) a letter from the Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services, indicating that the day care facility has received a license; and (2) diagrams showing both the floor plan of the indoor space and the outside play area. As soon as I have received the pictures, I will forward them to you. Very truly yours, JIA/lp Enclosures June 30, 1980 Mr. Glenn A. Jarrett 16 Prouty Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Jarrett: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning hoard of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City hall, Conference Room, 1175 b4iiliston Roau, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, July 14, 1980 at 5:UU P.A. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this meeting, we need the additional material (pictures & floor plan) as soon as possible. Very truly, Richard Wara, Zoning AcuUnistrative uff icer W/Mr-9 LEGAL OTICES SOUTH BURLING— T� In accordancZONIe ethe NOTICE South our .lington ZOnino Regulations and Chapter 117. Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board Of Adjust. ment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, July 14, 19w, at 5.00 p.m. to consider the following: Appeal of Glenn A. Jarrett seeking a conditional use, from Section 610, Day Care facilities (sub section 6.107) of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for per. mission to operate a day core facil. .Ity for six (6) pre-school children from o single family dwelling unit, j located of 16 Prouty Parkway. Appeal of Vermont , Federal Bank ISeeklna o variance, from Section 13.00, Non -conforming uses and structures of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request Is for Permission to alter an ingngs d repair on ex - is building and occupy Sold build. as o banking facility at Williston Rd. 1309 Appeal Of Knights of Columbus, I Reno Berard, agent, seeking a varl- ance, from Section 10.00, Permitted vses of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for per. , mission to construct a 40' x 100' building On a lot containing OOProx- , imately 2 acres, and occupy some as a business office and meeting hall ' for the Knights of Columbus, on lot No. 18 Berard Drive. Zoning AdministRichard Word rative Officer I June 30, 1980 6 y NOTICE OF APPEAL I.hereby appeal conditional use, Property Otimer. SOUTH BURLING ON ZONING B0Al2D OF AD.7USTIAiENT to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: e • ,ii-vT_.�..8'�'}�j' �t a ' _ ^ t-`i—{3 -1 . �—(�►n A. ��rr�f Property location & descripti Variance of Section (number) (title of section Basis of appeal I understand the regular meetings are held twice a month on Monday at 5:00 p.m. at the City Hall, Conference Room. The legal advertise- ment must appear in the Burlington Free Press a minimum of fifteen (15)-days before the hearing, I agree to pay a fee of $30.00 which fee is to off -set the costs of advertising and t hearing. a Hear D to Signature o Appellant --------_--------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE A in accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, 117 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on �m 7d; 47 at :OD �n1 • to consider the (day of eek (r It— and date) (time) following: 0 , � Appeal of l t �111 � [ n seeking a U4t-, , from Section �O U Zoning Regulations. Request of the South Burlington is for permission to Jay I. Ashman 139 Robinson Parkway Burlington, VT 05401 Mr. Richard Ward South Burlington Zoning Administrator South Burlington City Offices 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Ward: Enclosed please find Glenn Jarrett's application for a conditional use permit. I am writing this letter because, as one of the three parents who are responsible for the creation of this child care arrangement, I am most familiar with it. As you are probably aware, there is a critical need for quality child care in the Burlington area, particularly for children under 3 years of age. As working parents of an 18-month-old daughter, my wife and I have been unable to find a care situation for our child which is totally satisfactory to us. As a result, last January we began planning with the parents of another child to begin our own "parents' cooperative"day care program. Finding four other children was no problem. lie were also able to hire a highly qualified care giver. By far the most difficult task was finding affordable spa Ge which would meet licensing requirements. Glenn Jarrett, a personal friend, offered us the use of a part of his home. The space was inspected by the licensing division of SRS, and a license for six children has been issued. We hope to begin operation on August 4, 1980. I would like to point out some facts which the Board should consider in ruling on this application. This is not a profit -making venture. Parents of the children involved pay no more than is necessary to operate the program. Additional traffic will be minimal, because there will be only six children. Because of the ages of the children (1-3 years) there will be very little noise during outside play. The set-up of Mr. Jarrett's home is ideal for this use, given that the basement has a separate entrance, is carpeted, well -lighted, and his yard is fully fenced and has grass. In fact, the space is very comparable to that used by many women in the area who supplement their inccxrie by caring for children in addition to their own. I have taken pictures of the space, which I will send as soon as they are developed. I will also send a copy of the floor plan and license, as soon as I have received them form the licensing division. I hope this is satisfactory. Very truly yo s, Ja Ashman '!1 11) a . No Text No Text