The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVR-78-0000 - Supplemental - 0030 Pine Street (2)SOUTH F )LINGTON ZONING BOLD OF )JUSTICE NT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act il) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations i- the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is Cher fore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnece sorry hargsnip has not been created by the appellant; ' (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential_ character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is -located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be d&trimental to the public welfare; and (S) That the variance if autho rized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Da t e Cp , " Appellant Vote: ye List findings below: No Appeal # --` 4: � �E,7, Sig n SOUTH T )LINGTON ZONING BOARD OF OJUSTM,NT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in Xhe neighborhood or district in which the property is located; &�f—_.._ (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions or the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; appellant; ,. (3) That such unnecessaryhar' gship has not been created by the (1+) Tha t the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential_ character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is -located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacentproperty, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Da t e ."appellant, Vote. Llst fin Yes ngs below: i Appeal # No Sign SOUTH F )LINGTON ZONING BOARD OF _ )JUST?ENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions including irregularity, narrowness, or shallownes of lot size ize or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoninE regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (� (3) That such unnecessary hargsnip has not been created by the appellant; JA (4) That the variance,; if authorized, will not alter the essential'_ character- of the neighborhood or district in which the property is -located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relies' and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal. ,# 01 Date Appellant r Vote: Yes No -Sign List findings below: SOUTH F )LINGTON ZONING BOARD OF )JVSTISNT ?findings in accordance with Section 41+68 of the Planning & Development Act (l) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations P e property neighborhood or district in which the is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be develoDed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of -a variance is therefo necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnec ssary hardship has not been created by the appellant; i4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential_ character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is -located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of eadjacent pro rty, nor be dtrimental to the public welfare; and is) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the Ulan. Da t e 17k r Appellant___ Vote: Yes Last findings below: 1� Appeal # No F1 signjenj� SOUTH E �INGTON ZONING BOARD OF _ hSTMENT , {findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in t%e neighborhood or district in which the property is located; j A/ (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the propertycan be developed in strict Conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of -a variance is theref :e necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; -R"� (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; ' (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential! - character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is -located, nor substantially or aermanently impair the atiuropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date Appellant � Vote: yes d List findings below: a I No Appeal # - a.L SOUTH F )LINGTON ZONING BOARD OF - )JUSTICE NT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in he neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of -a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (Al (3) That such unnec ssary hargsnip has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential_ character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is -located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and Q� (5) That the variance if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Da to10, C/ �Vrl_111�e Appeal Appellant ZAP- ��=Gcsj •s- J¢. Vote: Yes V-'!!3 No Sign Zest findings below: SOUTH F )LINGTON ZONING BOARD OF )JUSTNSNT Findings in accordance with Section 1+468 of the Planning & Development Act il) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions,and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulatio nthe neighborhood or district in which the property is located; tN (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is 'erefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That suc unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; ' ii+ ) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential?_ character of the neighborhood or di s iy ct in which the propert is -located, nor substantially or Derma ntly impair the agDroDriate use or development of adjace t property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and is) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Da t e .6 Appellant 01(C�l�� Vote: Yes 0 No I•'st f ' ndings below: Appeal ;#_ _— THOMAS MEUNIER 32 Forest Street Area zoned R-4 District Section 11.00 Dimensional Requirements Minimum side yard - 15 feet Minimum rear yard - 30 feet Proposed: 20' x 20' detached garage to within 5 feet of the southerly side yard and 20 feet of the rear yard line. KATHLEEAT DUCH.` INE 30 Pine Street Area zoned R-4 District Section_ 13.00 Non -conforming uses and structures. Lot non -conforming to dimensional requirements - 75' x 150' (11,250 sq. 'Lt.) Minimum required for two fa -Wily units - 18,000 sq. ft. - 100 ft. frontage -garage non -conforming to dimensional requiremorfs- located to within ten (10) ft. of side yard. Minimum required 15 feet. Propose to convert upper portion of Garage including addition of full dormer into an apartment. Section 11.80 dwelling standards - minimum required 850 sc. ft.- proposed 500 sq. ft. KENTON STRINGHAI.1 36 Peterson Terrace Area zoned R-4 District Section 11.00 Dimensional requirements Minimum side yard - 15 feet Proposed: 20' x 24' detached garage to within three (3) feet of northerly side yard. DORET%1TJS Plants Plus LTD. 1475 Shelburne Road Area zonec Interim Traffic District Propose use is conditional, will require hearing before City Council. June 5, 1978 Mrs. Kathleen Duchaine 30 Pine Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mrs. Duchaine: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Monday, June 19, 1978 at 5:00 p.m. to consider your request fnr a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this hearing. Very truly, Richard ward Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg 1 Encl NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance, decision of administrative officer. Property Owner M rY k A � t C ny Le c. `n w.; -1 s Property location & descriptiony� Variance of Section , (number) (title of section Basis of appeal 'NAN b -)or w\--c Vt� P_ x, 1 ^Q a a I I understand the regular meetings are held twice a month on Monday at 5:00 p.m. at the City Hall, Conference Room. The legal advertise- ment must appear in the Burlington Free Press a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing, I agree to pay a fee of $30.00 which fee is to off -set the costs of advertising and the hearing. Hearing Date Signature of Appellant ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on at to consider the (day of week) (_rdonth and date) (time) following: �Ap pea l of seeking a �G Gd s� from Section /,f•Dy , _7� 2�,,cic� . �i• o� f the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to 7� .c-t��co �� 'a . Q�_e.� ,�... c-o-ri -+-u �- tj + -� D�rc"�"rwe-`-► / T1 LEGAL NOTICES SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Bur- lington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adlust- ment will hold a Public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Rood, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, June 19, 1978, at 5:00 p.m. to consider the following: No. 1 Appeal of Thomas and Louise Meunier seeking a variance, from Section 11.00, Dimensional require- ments of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for per- mission to construct a 20' x 20' go- roge to within five (5) feet of the southerly side line and 'twenty (20) feet of the rear yard line, at 32 For- est Street. No. 2 Appeal of Kathleen Duchoine seeking a variance, from Section 13.00, Non -conforming uses 6 struc- tures, Section 11.00 Dimensional re-' ouirements of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for perrnlssion to add a shed dormer to existing garage and convert to an efficiency apartment also requiring o variance from Section 11 90, apart- ment to contain aDproximateiv 500 square feet, at 30 Pine Street. i No. 3 Apoeol of Kenton E. Stringhom seeking a variance, from Section 11.00, Dimensional requirements of the South Burlington Zoning Regu- lotions. Request is for permission to construct a 20' x 24paroge to within three (3) feet of the northerly side yard, at 36 Peterson Terrace. No, A Appeal of Elizabeth D. Doremus seeking a variance, from Section 11.15, Multiple Uses of the South Burlington Zoning Regu- lations. Reouest is for permission to convert an existing detached garage Into on antique shop, in conlUnction with existing residential units and florist shop, of 1475 Shelburne Rood. No. 5 Appeal of Karl Ashline, Agent seeking a variance, from Section 9.00, Permitted uses and Section 11.15 Multiple uses of the South Bur- lington Zoning Regulations. Request Is for permission to construct an ad- dition (I140 square feet) to on exist- ing structure, and o pole born (800 square feet): to operate a controctor's business along with a catering service and a third com- mercial use, from existing and pro• posed structures located at 190E Air. part Parkway. Robert M.'Martineau, Chairman South Burlington Zoning Board of Adiustment June 3. 1978 t LET j S rz� v� PRESENTATION PROCEEDURES FOR APPELLANTS TO THE SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT _The Zoning Board Adjustment is a quasi-iudicial body empowered to hear appeals to the Zoning regulations. These regulations have the force and —effect of law. It is the responsibility of you, the petitioner to present your documented arguments as to why the Board should grant a variance in your case. The Board has little discretionary power and each of the following five criteria must be met before the Board can grant a variance. Not one - three or four but a_11 five of the following facts must be found by the Board before a variance can be granted. Please come prepared to present all the facts necessary for the Board to make an objective and intelligent decision. (Refer to Sec. 4468 of the Planning and Development Act of 1969 for further clarification). 1. That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; Z. That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 3. That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 4. That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 5. That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. v Ge v-ov-cl 'D 3 o OP; e) c .5+rt -4r 7z Pro go se4 DO r nn e Y- of 'D 0 r I- I 20 DATE JOB I , 77MI i r 1 I I I _ I i I � ' + ' 1 r i1 ! 1 PI ,