The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVR-80-0000 - Supplemental - 0008 Pine Tree Terrace (2)IVERSON 8 Pinetree Terrace Area zoned R-4 District Section 11.00 Dimensional requirements: minimum side yard - 15 feet Existing 10' x 4" side yard is non -conforming under Section 13.00 Proposed - addition 14' x 26' and 7' x 8' to be constructed within ten (10) feet of southerly side yard. SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOA.KD OF ADJUST2SNT Findings in accordance with Section 1+468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or, exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not -the circumstances or conditions generally created b.- the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity. with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; EA (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; i (4) ""hat the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the ar,Dropriate use or development of adjacent :property, nor b.e detrimental to t-.e public welfare; and U (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the lust modification Dossible of the zoning regulations and of the Dla_n a Appeal Da to ��+j - - Appellant Vote: Yes. No Sign c List findings below: r 2. 3- SOUTH BLMLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUMENT Findings in accordance with Section 1-468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unioue physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or, exceptional topographical- or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; Ll (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity.�with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; C1 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of _the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the a n-rerriate use or development of adjacent, property, nor le detrimental to t e public welfare; and Q (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and wi31 represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the elan. f Appeal 7r_ Date ADDellant Vote: Yes. No Sign List findings below: 1. 2 z6� . Vie. 3. SOUTH BU'RLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTYSEENT Findings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or, exceptional topographical -or _ other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions g nerally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in he neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisicns of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; E( (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if' authorized, will not alter the essential - character of .the r_eighborrood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or Dermanently impair the a-,,nrcDriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to t-r:e public welfare; and Q (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the Dla_n. Appeal n 3 Date -1� - Appellant /j Vote: Yes. Q No Sign % R/ List findings below: !) V (J 2. �� -- 3- SOUTH BLTFLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 446F of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or. exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zor_;ng regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; V (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoninc regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential - character of .the neighborhood or district in which the rT operty is located, nor substantially or per-manently iMDair the a.,DrcDriate use or development of adjacent, property, nor b.e detrimental to tr:e public welfare; and LN (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and wi31 represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the Dla_n. Appeal Date Appellant Vote: Yes. No r-1 List findings below: 1. 2. Sign 3- i SOUTH BL'P.LINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTNr"NT Findings in accordance with Section 1+468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or. exceptional topographical -or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; I (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; a (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential - character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanentl imDair the a.prcDriate use or development of adjacent roperty, nor I-e d,_4— ntal to t--e public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the lust modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal --� Date Appellant Vote: Yes- No Sign List findings below: Q 2. 3• SOUTH BU'F?LINGTON ZONING BOARD OF 'ADJUS ENT Findings in accordance with Section 41+68 of the Planning & Development Act a (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or: exceptional topographical - or other physical conditions peculiar to the parti lar property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to sxlch conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions gene ally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoninc regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefoTt-''necessary to enable the reasonable use of the propert3� ; LG� (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (1+) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of .the neighborhood or district in which the DT operty is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the a,�mprcpriate use or develoument of adjacentproperty, nor b.e detrimental to the public welfare; and " (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum var=ance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Da to 1-2 _ appellant LI/ Jr Vote: Yes No List findings bet 1. lJ 2. 3. t Appeal n T6:-The South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment 'From: Gary Iverson Re: Request for variance at 8 Pinetree Terrace Date: June 23, 1980 1. I would like to remodel and add on to the present structure at 8 Pinetree Terrace for the following reasons. A) I will be married on June 28, 1980.and my family will increase to a total of four persons from the present total of one. B) The cost of relocating in this community to accomo date my larger family is prohibitive at this point in time. 2. A diagram of the request for variance is attached. 3. I feel that several criteria can be described that will help to justify our need for a variance. A) The lot is very narrow at 60 feet and the present structure measures 32 feet in width by 24 feet in depth, leaving at present 16 feet on the left side of the lot and 10 feet 4 inches on the right side. The present structure is non -conforming to the 15 foot requirement by 4 feet 8 inches, but was built in 1950. 9) The proposed addition keeps the present lines of the house intact and adds depth to the present structure as well as a slight rise in the roof line of approximately 4 feet. C) The proposed lower floor addition of a kitchen and family room, with the small foyer entry has been planned to fit the existing lines as well as our needs. D) Altering the addition to fit zoning requirements would mean a complete change in the concept of the addition as well as limiting the use of the present kitchen (which will become a dining room) to enter the upstairs proposed bedroom addition. E) I am not interfering in any manner with view of neighbors or intruding on the privacy of same as a large row of 10 foot shrubs and a fence form the property line. The only bordering neighbors at this exact point of addition is a multi family apartment house on Williston Road. L'T 4"4 _ _ m / r _(' t7 �..G-�-r~vt,.c.,..`,•t�...�,.,C,:r�r�-, ,u.., :....r• lie --"—_ .._...—._ �a Q.�t�o-_. m LEGAL NOTICES - T SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Bur. lington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adiust- ment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, June 23, 1980, at 5:00 p.m. to consider the following: 1. Appeal of Robert L. Provost seek- ing a variance, from Section 11.15, Multiple uses of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Reuauest is for permission to operate on automotive travel Insurance agency (600 square feet) in coniunction with on existing real estate agency and residential unit at 1270 Williston Road. 2. Appeal of Doris W. Gilleland seek- ing a variance, from Section 11.00, Dimensional requirements of the South Burlington Zoning Regu- lations. Request is for permission to construct an 8'01' enclosed screened porch to within ten (10) feet of the northerly sideyard, at 50 Elsom Parkway. 3. Appeal of Gary D. Iverson seeking o variance, from Section 11.00, Dimensional requirements and Sec- tion 13.00 Non-confrrming structure of the South Burlington Zoning Regu- lations. Request Is for permission to construct on additional 14'x 26' and Tx 8' to the rear of existing dwelling unit to within approximately ten (10) feet Of the southerly sideyard, of 8 Pinetree Terrace. 4. Appeal of Robert and Ruth Earley seeking o variance, from Section 11.00, Dimensional requirements and Section 13.00 Non -conforming struc- tures of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request Is for per- mission to construct a second floor addition containing 912 square feet and occupy as a second residential dwelling unit or a alternative pro- Posalto tncrease on existing poroge to 26'x30' In size and convert some Into a residential dwelling unit on a lot containing 7,000 square feet, lo- cated at 79 Kirby Rood. 5. Appeal of Mark and Ellen Furnarl seeking a variance, from Section 13.00, Non-contorming structures of the South Burlington Zoning Reau- lations. Request Is for permission to remove 7'9"x 18' porch and con- struct a two story 7'x9"xI9' addition, structure Involved is nonconforming to the dimensional requirements, lo. cated of 4 Stow Avenue, Queen City Park. Richard Word, Zoning Administrative Officer June 7, 1980 June 9, 1980 Nr. Gary Iverson 8 Pinetree Terrace South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Iverson. Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City hall, Conference ism, 1175 Williston is ad on Monday, June 23, 1980 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Plaase plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Ufficer 1U/mcg to consider the the South Burlington/ NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance, decision of administrative officer. Property Owner C ��% � � z � W/O Property location & description Aga YTY4- Variance of Section , (number) (title of section Basis of appeal I understand the regular meetings are held twice a month on Monday at 5:00 p.m. at the City Hall, Conference Room. The legal advertise- ment must appear in the Burlington Free Press a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing, I agree to pay a fee of $30.00 which fee is to off -set the costs of advertising and the 7ing. Hearing Date Signature' f Appellant 6` ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on (day of week) following: , r' Appeal of , at (Month and date) (time) seeking a from Section /�a f Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to