The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMS-04-04 - Supplemental - 0019 Pinnacle DriveCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLAN IIIG & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH B RLINGTON, VERNIOTN7 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 2, 2005 Fred Peet 19 Pinnacle Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Minutes — 19 Pinnacle Drive Dear Mr. Peet. - Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the January 18, 2005 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, R Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 JANUAR Y 2005 6. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-77 and Final Plat Application #SD-04-78 of Michael Gravelin, dba A & M Construction Corp. for a planned unit development to convert a 2142 sq ft single family dwelling to Day Care and/or General Office use, 1060 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Burke said they have prepared a plat. He noted that Russ Barone, who owns the neighboring property, has asked that 2 maples be retained to block light from his property. Mr. Burke said one maple may be saved, but he did not feel that they serve the purpose of blocking any light. Mr. Dinklage noted that the neighbor was also concerned with runoff. Mr. Burke said this occurred after the road was shifted. They have agreed to change the direction of the swale. Mr. Belair noted there is a stipulation that the City Engineer must approve of what they do in this regard. Members agreed to leave Stipulation #6 (compliance with requests of the Fire Chief) in the motion. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-77 and Final Plat Application #SD-04-78 of Michael Gravelin, dba A & M Construction subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. l.'/ Miscellaneous application #MS-04-04 of Fred Peet for approval under Section 3.12 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations to alter the grade by placing more than 20 cubic yards of :fill on the property, 19 Pinnacle Drive: Mr. Dinklage noted that the fill has already been placed and asked the applicant why this was done without a permit. Mr. Peet said they brought in more fill than anticipated and didn't realize they needed a permit. Mr. Dinklage reminded him that a permit is needed for more than 20 cubic yards of fill. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Miscellaneous Application #MS-04-04 of Fred Peet subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Application #CU-04-16 of Vignesh Solai for conditional use review under Section 14.10 Conditional Use Review of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is for permission to allow an accessory residential unit, 8 Laurel Hill Drive: Mr. Dinklage reminded the applicant of the restrictions for accessory units. He asked if there would be any exterior alterations. Mr. Solai said there would not. The accessory unit will use the entrance on the left side of the house. The unit will have a kitchen. -3- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNE4G & ZONEgG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERNIONT 05403 (802) 546-4106 FAX (802) 546-4101 January 14, 2005 Fred Peet 19 Pinnacle Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 19 Pinnacle Drive Dear Mr. Peet: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, January 18, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy cDonough Administrative Assistan Encl. Country Scapes 8218 60th St. Circle East Apprt#1502 Sarasota, FL 32432 Dear Fred, I have gathered the following information for material totals used in the construction of our landscape project residing at 19 Pinnacle dr. in South Burlington Vermont. Fill materials delivered to 19 Pinnacle • Crush Stone— 300yard 1.5" SLC clean drain stone • Stone dust— 35yard manufactured sand • Clean sand fill— 150yard • Composted manure / garden soil— 325 yards • Top soil— 65 yards Sincerely, Keith Boucher Owner / operator Country Scapes CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FROM: Brian Robertson, Associate Planner 0-- DATE: January 14, 2005 RE: Miscellaneous Application #MS-04-04 Agenda #7 Fred Peet, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking miscellaneous approval under Section 3.12 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations to alter the grade by placing more than 20 cubic yards of fill on the property, 19 Pinnacle Drive. Staff has recently discovered that the applicant had filled the area around their home without approval or a permit. The applicant was placed in violation and this application is to correct that violation. This application shall be reviewed under Section 3.12 of the Land Development Regulations. The removal from land or the placing on land of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material in an amount equal to or greater than twenty (20) cubic yards, except when incidental to or in connection with the construction of a structure on the same lot, shall require the approval of the Development Review Board, The Development Review Board may grant such approval where such modification is requested in connection with the approval of a.site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat. This section does not apply to the removal of earth products in connection with a resource extraction operation. Standards and Conditions for Approval: (1) The Development Review Board shall review a request under this Section for compliance with the standards contained in this sub -Section 3.12(B). An application under Section 3.12(A) above shall include the submittal of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat application showing the area to be filled or removed, and the existing grade and proposed grade created by removal or addition of material. The applicant submitted a plan, dated November 11, 2004, which shows the pre-existing grade and the existing grade. These plans are sufficient to satisfy this requirement. However, the applicant did not indicate how much fill was added to the subject property. 1. The applicant shall submit documentation indicating the amount of fill that was added to the subject property, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. (2) The Development Review Board, in granting approval may impose any conditions it deems necessary, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) Duration or phasing of the permit for any length of time. Staff does not feel this requirement is applicable to the subject application. (b) Submission of an acceptable plan for the rehabilitation of the site at the conclusion of the operations, including grading, seeding and planting, fencing, drainage, and other appropriate measures. Staff does not feel this requirement is applicable to the subject application. (c) Provision of a suitable bond or other security adequate to assure compliance with the provisions of this Section. Stag does not feel this requirement is applicable to the subject application. (d) Determination of what shall constitute pre -construction grade under Section 3.07, Height of Structures. The pre -construction height for future development will be the existing grade. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Miscellaneous Application #MS-04-04, conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document. i u m 0 WALK DRIVE ' I I I I ( I 1 ' ` - - - - - •',," ; DECK IIIII I PA110 IIIII g A m `R IXISTiNG RESIDENCE J�1111 I � • PATIO , 1 4 I \ LII e' NOTE; \ \ BOUNDARIES SHOWN HEREIN ARE BASED ON A SURVEY BY FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN, INC \ ' DATED 10/11/93, A5 WELL A5 PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FOUND. TH15 DRAWING IS NOT TO DE USED TO DETERMINE LEGAL PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. 51TE FEATURES, A5-15UILT CONTOURS AND PRE-EXISTING CONTOURS OUTSIDE OF NEW GARDEN AKEA5 ARE BASED ON A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND AN A55UMEO DATUM. PRE-EXISTING CONTOURS WITHIN NEW GARDEN AREAS ARE ASSUMED. GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET) 1 inch = 30' LEGEND OSEWER MANHOLE ID TELEPHONE PULL BOX APPROXIMATE EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY APPROXIMATE PRE -CONSTRUCTION GROUND CONTOURS 'AS -BUILT' NEW GROUND CONTOURS 4 UTILITY POLES AND OVERHEAD WIRES - - — - - - - - - - - — EDGE OF NEW GARDENS . . . . . . . . . . . . EDGE OF PRE -CONSTRUCTION GARDENS W. Bradford Ramsay, F.E. Fred V. Peet f9 P/nnec% Dr/ve South BuN/ngton, Vermont SME PLAN O.l.. Jo6 Typ.: 56./c NOV. Of I ZON/NO PERM/T I Y. - 30' CITY OF SOUTH BLJRLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 19, 2005 Fred Peet 19 Pinnacle Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Miscellaneous Application #MS-04-04 Dear Mr. Peet: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the Development Review Board on January 18, 2005. Please note the conditions of approval, including that the applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Bets McDonou 1 y gh Administrative Assistant Encl. Permit Number M S - - d y APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month . That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Type of application check one: ( ) Appeal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation) ( ) Request for a conditional use () equest for a variance (WOther PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY) WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING? 1) OWNER OF RECORD(Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) �d 7 1660 - 21:12, dA 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 6n,,,k 5-3S 006yl; 20 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) , ( r)-7 z- 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) So.-7e- 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Sa rr,- 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) /-2 3 -e — 0 0 d / % 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) an ool lb(A r O F L.elac�ScuQ c) Total building square fooutage on property (propos d buildings and existing buildings to remain) j� 0U P1•�k) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) La n c.Aam ac-_cl e) Number of residential unit (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) UhC4dnY f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) A/,,,7 ei g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE U n e-Adj��,�tl a) Building: Existing % Proposed -% b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing _% Proposed % (does not apply to residential uses) 9 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 7 00 /11yq 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: $ Oo A •-i yc 7 r 60 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: We.Qkr.xi/ 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Arr 14) LIST ABUTTERS ( List names and addresses of all abutting property owners on a separate sheet of paper). �i n ✓ . A 4 Sc es rl /1 61-c'd 0 r'L t cj1ct� Vj -,To,r f fl ,1 3 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I / / / 0 y REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete l Di6ctor of Planning & Zoning or Designee date 2