Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCU-01-12 - Supplemental - 0047 Proctor AvenueDEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 15 MAY 2001 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 15 May 2001, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage Chair; J. Cameron, M. Boucher, R.Farley, G. Quimby, L. Kupferman Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; S. Stitzel, City Attorney; M. Kane, G. Rabideau, L. Bresee, E. Greenfeld, J. Sorenson, D. Cumming, J. Poncetto, D. Marshall, D. White, J. Hausner, B. Nedde, R. Marcelino, B. Shearer, J. Jaeger, J. Larkin 1. Workshop with City Attorney: Members met with the City Attorney and discussed procedural matters and questions that had arisen during the course of meetings. 2. Other Business: Members agreed to change the date of the 3 July meeting to 10 July. 3. Minutes of 1 May 2001: Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 1 May as written. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Public Hearing: Application #CU-01-12 of Elaine Greenfield seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05,Conditional Uses and Section 26.75,Accessory Residential Units, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to construct an accessory residential unit not to exceed 30% of the living space of the primary residence, 47 Proctor Avenue: Ms. Greenfield said they want to build the unit for her 85 year old mother. She said that she understood the conditions involving this unit. Mr. Belair said the proposed units meets requirements. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Application #CU-01-12 of Elaine Greenfield subject to the conditions in the approval motion of 15 May 2001. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Public Hearing: Application #CU-01-13 of Vermont Community Botanical Garden seeking approval under section 25.117, Alteration of Existing Grade, of the South Burling- ton Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to place 600 cubic yards of fill to build initial gardens and berm, 1100 Dorset St: 5115101 MOTION OF APPROVAL GREENFIELD — CONDITIOiNAL USE APPLICATION 47 PROCTOR AVENUE I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve conditional use application #CU-01-12 of Elaine Greenfield seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses and Section 26.75, Accessory Residential Units, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 480 square foot accessory residential unit, 47 Proctor Avenue, as depicted on a three (3) page set of plans, page one entitled "Proposed Addition for Greenfield Residence So. Burlington, Vermont", with a stamped received date of 4/11/01, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The occupancy of this accessory unit will be limited to the conditions of Section 26.75 of the Zoning Regulations including: a) Occupancy of the accessory residential unit is restricted to not more than two (2) persons, one of whom is related by blood or marriage to the owner of the primary single-family residence, or is disabled as defined in subdivision 252(2) of Title 18, or is at least 55 years of age. b) Floor space of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed 30% of the floor space of the existing living area of the primary single-family residence or 400 square feet, whichever is greater. c) The primary single-family residence is occupied by the owner. 3) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the Zoning Regulations or this approval is null and void. 4) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board CITY OF SOUTH BURLING-I-ON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 June 19, 2001 Elaine Greenfield 47 Proctor Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Conditional Use Application, 47 Proctor Avenue Dear Ms. Greenfield: Enclosed please find a copy of the minutes and Finding of Facts of the Development Review Board meeting on May 15, 2001 (effective date June 12, 2001). Please note the conditions of approval, including that a Zoning Permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval will be null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Associate Planner Enclosure 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 11, 2001 Elaine Greenfield 47 Proctor Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Conditional Use Application, 47 Proctor Avenue Dear Ms. Greenfield: Enclosed is the agenda for the next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and my comments. Please be sure someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, May 15, 21001 at 7:30 P.M. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please Yve me a call. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp Encls 5115101 . ............................ MOTION OF APPROVAL GREENFIELD — CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION, 47 PROCTOR AVENUE I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve conditional use application #CU-01-12 of Elaine Greenfield seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses and Section 26.75, Accessory Residential Units, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 480 square foot accessory residential unit, 47 Proctor Avenue, as depicted on a three (3) page set of plans, page one entitled "Proposed Addition for Greenfield Residence So. Burlington, Vermont", with a stamped received date of 4/11/01, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The occupancy of this accessory unit will be limited to the conditions of Section 26.75 of the Zoning Regulations including: a) Occupancy of the accessory residential unit is restricted to not more than two (2) persons, one of whom is related by blood or marriage to the owner of the primary single-family residence, or is disabled as defined in subdivision 252(2) of Title 18, or is at least 55 years of age. b) Floor space of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed 30% of the floor space of the existing living area of the primary single-family residence or 400 square feet, whichever is greater. c) The primary single-family residence is occupied by the owner. 3) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the Zoning Regulations or this approval is null and void. 4) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 5/15/01 MOTION OF APPROVAL GREENFIELD — CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION 47 PROCTOR AVENUE I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve conditional use application #CU-01-12 of Elaine Greenfield seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses and Section 26.75, Accessory Residential Units, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 480 square foot accessory residential unit, 47 Proctor Avenue, as depicted on a three (3) page set of plans, page one entitled "Proposed Addition for Greenfield Residence So. Burlington, Vermont", with a stamped received date of 4/11/01, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The occupancy of this accessory unit will be limited to the conditions of Section 26.75 of the Zoning Regulations including: a) Occupancy of the accessory residential unit is restricted to not more than two (2) persons, one of whom is related by blood or marriage to the owner of the primary single-family residence, or is disabled as defined in subdivision 252(2) of Title 18, or is at least 55 years of age. b) Floor space of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed 30% of the floor space of the existing living area of the primary single-family residence or 400 square feet, whichever is greater. c) The primary single-family residence is occupied by the owner. 3) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the Zoning Regulations or this approval is null and void. 4) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. a PUBLIC HEAPING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD [ The South Burlington Development 'Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Bur- lington City Hail Confer- ence Room, 575 Dorset Street. South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, May 15. 2001, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the fol- lowing: 1]Application #CU-01-12 of Elaine Greenfield seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses and Section 26.75, Ac- cessory Residential Units, of the. South Bur- iington Zoning Regula- tions., Request is for per- mission to construct an accessory residential unit' not to exceed 309/6 of the living space of the primary residence, 47 Proctor Avenue. 21 Application #CU-01- 1 o Independent Wire- less One Leased Realty. Corporation- seeking conditional use approval. from Section 26.05 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to install;` six [6] telecommunication antennas on an observa- tion deck to extend 54 feet 4,inches above the, existing grader 1200 Air- port Drive. 3 Application #CU-01, 1 of Vermont Commu- nity Botanical Garden is seeking approval under Section 25.117, Altera, lion of Existing Grade, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations- Re- quest is for permission to place 600 cubic yards of fill to build initial gar- densand berm, 1100. Dorset Street. 4]Preliminary plat appli- cation #SD-01-20 of Wil- liam Shearer for a planned unit develop- ment consisting of the expansion of an existing 44,520 square foot auto sales and service facility by adding _ 29t722 square feet of building space footage which -includes two. [2] additions to the existing main building, replacing the used car sales building with a new building and constituting a new service and repair facility, 1675 Shelburne Road. 5]Finaf _plat application #SD-01-1 of Farwater, Ltd to amend a planned unit development consis- ting of 85 residential: units in four (4] buildings on two [2] lots.- The amendment consists of: 11 constructing a 42 until congregate housing fa- cilityon:the east side and 2] amending condition #9' of the 5/16/01 deci- sio.n, 303 Lime Kiln Road. 6J/ '-ninary plat appli- call ySD-01-27. (oral 1 pla ,piication #SD-01- 28 and desiggn review ap- plication #DR-01-02 of South Burlington Realty Company to amend a planned unit develop- ment consisting. of: 1 a 4800 square foot building consisting of 3,600 square feet of conven- ience store use and a 1200 square foot fast food restaurant with twenty two [22] seats, 21 an 8,060 square foot building consisting of 3500 square feet of Ben- i eral office use and 4560 1 square feet used for a multiple number of com- mercial uses for a multi- ple number of tenants, 3] an 8,944: square foot building [phase 11 and a 13,640 square foot build- ing [phase 2] for a multi - pie number of commer- cial uses for a multiple number of tenants, 364, 366 and 368 Dorset Street:' The amendment consists of: ,1] reducing the 4,800 square foot building consisting of 3,- 600 square feet of con- venience store use sand a 1200' square foot fast `food :restaurant with twenty two [22] seats to 2,400 square feet used for retail at 364 Dorset Street, 21. removing the 13,640 square foot build- ing [phase 2] at 368 Dor- set Street used for a multiple number of com- mercial uses for a multi- ple number of tenants, and 3] constructing a 20,000 square .foot med- ical office building along the eastern boundary of 364, 366 and 368 Dorset Street. 71 Final plat application #SD-01-25 of Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. to amend nine [9] building planned unit develop- ment on a 38.9 acre lot consisting of 188,077 square feet of shopping center use, a 55,000 square foot supermarket, a 95 room hotel and a 3585' square foot bank with drive -through serv- ice. The amendment con- sists of modifications to the Lowe's site plan con- sisting of:, 1] correcting size of the three (31 vesti- bules. 21 allowing the gabled portion of the building to exceed the height limit by ten feet to a height of 50.1 feet above ppre-construction grade, 3] adding side- walk display areas, 41 adding a 10 foot high sound wall, 5) revising landscaping and lighting, 61 eliminating some re- serve parking spaces, and 71 revising the storm water pond, Shelburne Road and Hannaford Drive. Copies of the applica- tions are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board April 28, 2001 Elaine �reej ie1.d yianist April 17, 2001 Ms. Sarah MacCallum Dept. of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ms. MacCallum: In response to your letter of April 11: Re: Issue #1- 30% rule, need to reduce square footage 'Z'ECE;VED APR 2 5 a0l 0f So. Bor'Qogton Upon reviewing the plans submitted to your office on April 10th two facts presented themselves which will put the intended accessory unit well within 30% of the present structure, or very close, depending upon what is allowed. 1-1 realized that, in my haste, 330 sq. ft. of living space in the finished basement waste overlooked when square footage was calculated. This brings the house to 1746 sq. ft. (not 1416 ). (also, the garage at 24' x 24' and 1 1 /2 bathrooms were not included) 2- 60 sq. ft. of the accessory unit is actually not intended as living space. It is closet area to be installed under the existing house roof. This would bring the accessory unit down from 540 sq. ft. to 480 sq. ft. If the 30 % rule is applied the unit then falls well within the limits. Re: Issue #2 - I will continue to own and live in the house. Re: Issue #3 - The accessory unit is planned for my 85 year old mother, who is in excellent health. It is also important to note that the plans for the addition were carefully designed by an architect to enhance the appearance of the existing house and compliment present neighborhood styles. This was done without any change to the existing footprint of the house and with unobtrusive roof line design. If the board is still not satisfied with the plans as presented and revised, I would like to apply for a variance in order to arrive at board approval. Sincerely, Elaine Greenfield 47 TroctorAvemw -South Burhnyton,'Uernwnt o54o3. 8o2-864-9209 RIDGE ADD'N 24'-11" - - - - _ RIDGE HOUSE 22'-3" TOP ADD'N 17'-0" - - - - --- ---------- -- - ------------------ FFL ADD'N FFL HOUSE ----------------------------------- ----- �■ mum tea■ �= �;.� � � = . - . M III All � � �■ I■rrsrest�' i i 4 city of Su. Burilingtofit OEAST ELEVATION 1/8• 1 1'-0' C sO EK 0 a 10 M N w co it — 6 -2 M I CLOS O 1 — N BATH � y� �� I � 15 • = I 14 12 i� 7'-0" -- - I I LIVING ao I �+ I X O Sfi I ❑ 7 I 3OX55 30X56 3OX55 3OX56 2C'-7" 4'-0" &� r G'�20� 0 akcoq?- Dr N07E: ALL DIMENSIONS 70 BE CONFIRMED IN FIELD. tr kz " PLAN O 1/8, ■ 1'-0' RIDGE ADD'N 4'-11 EC �- City of So. Burlington OSOUTH ELEVATION 1/8, 0 1'-01 OP ADD'N 7'-0" r L ADD'N -0" ` f IIII, �W' q'T+ A� j AV - � ` - _ _ _ _ I - -�' w`�s-h ✓1Q. � t-yaus� 1 T--�Ki.Siz �-yq � - --! G I B / agXaE) oZ cZ x�{o� �aE{ ` a�tX� room 4obe, - Q (—C4ase4 s a-C-0 o R To: South Burlington Develop ent Review Board °v laijrr From: Raymond J. Be�,6 dministrative Officer Re: May 15, 2001 agenda items Date: May 11, 2001 3) GREENFIELD—ACCESSORY APARTMENT - CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION, 47 PROCTOR AVENUE The applicant is seeking conditional use approval under Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, and Section 26.75, Accessory Residential Units, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Requests is for permission to construct an accessory residential unit not to exceed 30% of the living space of the primary residence. The property at 47 Proctor Avenue is located in the Residential Four District. It is bounded on the east by Orchard Road, on the north by Proctor Avenue, on the west by a single family residence, and on the south by a single family residence. The proposed use complies with the stated purpose of the Residential Four District to "encourage residential use at moderate densities that are compatible with existing neighborhoods and undeveloped land adjacent to those neighborhoods." The proposed use will not adversely affect: a) the capacity of existing or planned community facilities. No affect expected. b) the character of the area affected. No adverse affect is expected. c) traffic on roads or highways in the vicinity. The proposed use is not expected to impact traffic. d) bylaws in effect. The proposal is in conformance with the zoning regulations. e) utilization of renewable resources. There is no utilization of renewable energy resources to be affected. f) general public health and welfare. No adverse affect is expected. Section 26.75 of the Zoning Regulations: The occupancy of this accessory unit will be limited to the conditions of Section 26.75 of the Zoning Regulations including: a) Occupancy of the accessory residential unit is restricted to not more than two (2) persons, one of whom is related by blood or marriage to the owner of the primary single-family residence, or is disabled as defined in subdivision 252(2) of Title 18, or is at least 55 years of age. b) Floor space of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed 30% of the floor space of the existing living area of the primary single-family residence or 400 square feet, whichever is greater. Information provided by the applicant indicates that the DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO MAY fly, 2001 MEETING accessory residential unit may exceed the size limitation of 30%. Staff will attempt to resolve this issue before the meeting. c) The primary single-family residence is occupied by the owner. The applicant has been made aware of these conditions and does not have a problem with them. 4) NATIONAL GARDENING ASSOCIATION—1F'ILL & BE - CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION,100 DGRSET STREET The applicant is seeking conditional use approval under Section 25.117, Alteration of Existing Grade. Request is for permission to place 600 cubic yards of fill to build initial gardens and berm, 1100 Dorset Street. The Development Review Board last approved the site plan for this property at the April 4, 2000 meeting (minutes enclosed). This property located at 1100 Dorset Street lies within the Park and Recreation District. It is bounded on the north by Swift Street, on the west by Dorset Street, on the south by the golf course and on the east by undeveloped land. Section 25.117 Requirements: The proposed falling will exceed twenty (20) cubic yards and therefore must comply with the standards of Section 25.113(b) referenced in Section 25.117(a) of the Zoning Ordinance: a) The project must utilize topography and must relate to other existing and proposed structures so as to be aesthetically compatible with the neighborhood. The filling must not extend to the property lines and must blend with the existing contours. The applicant should not make existing stormwater runoff conditions worse. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and finds them acceptable. b) The project must not detract from scenic views of adjacent properties or public walkways. The proposed grading must not exceed the elevations presently found on the site. c) The project should allow for retention of additional green space that will enhance the appearance of the developed property. Conditional Use Criteria: The proposed use complies with the stated purpose of the Park and Recreation District to "provide for and to protect recreational use and/or open space in municipal parks, beaches, natural areas and other land owned by the City." The proposed use will not adversely affect: a) the capacity of existing or planned community facilities. No affect expected. b) the character of the area affected. The proposed berms have been designed to complement the existing gardens and landscaping. c) traffic on roads or highways in the vicinity. No affect expected. Elaim �reenfield pianist April 17, 2001 Ms. Sarah MacCailum Dept. of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ms. MacCallum: In response to your letter of April 11 - Re'. Issue #1 - 30% rule, need to reduce square footage 1v t MMEM Upon reviewing the plans submitted to your office on April 1 Oth two facts presented themselves which will put the intended accessory unit well within 30% of the present structure, or very close, depending upon what is allowed. 1 -1 realized that, in my haste, 330 sq. ft. of living space in the finished basement was overlooked when square footage was calculated. This brings the house to 17_4_Q2 sq. ft. (not 1416 ). (also, the garage at 24' x 24' and 1 1/2 bathrooms were not included) 2- 60 sq, ft. of the accessory unit is actually not intended as living space. It is closet area to be installed under the existing house roof. This would bring the accessory unit down from 540 sq. ft. to 4aQ sq. ft. If the 30 % rule is applied the unit then falls well within the limits. Re: Issue #2 - I will continue to own and live in the house. Re: Issue #3 - The accessory unit is planned for my 85 year old mother, who is in excellent health. It is also important to note that the plans for the addition were carefully designed by an architect to enhance the appearance of the existing house and compliment present neighborhood styles. This was done without any change to the existing footprint of the house and with unobtrusive roof line design. If the board is still not satisfied with the plans as presented and revised, I would like to apply for a variance in order to arrive at board approval. Sincerely, Elaine Greenfield 47 'PtoctorAvenue, -South BadingWqmnont 05403. 802-864-9209 Elaine Crecnfield Yianist OR 2 5 tom April 17, 2001 Ms. Sarah MacCallurn Dept. of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ms. MacCallum: In response to your letter of April 11, Re: Issue #1 - 30% rule, need to reduce square footage Upon reviewing the plans submitted to your office on April 1 Oth two facts presented themselves which will put the intended accessory unit well within 30% of the present structure, or very close, depending upon what is allowed. 1 -1 realized that, in my haste, 330 sq. ft. of living space in the finished basement was overlooked when square footage was calculated. This brings the house to 114a sq. ft. (not 1416 ). (also, the garage at 24'x 24'and 1 1/2 bathrooms were not included) 2- 60 sq. ft. of the accessory unit is actually not intended as living space. It is closet area to be installed under the existing house roof. This would bring the accessory unit down from 540 sq. ft. to 43Q sq. ft. If the 30 % rule is applied the unit then falls well within the limits. Re: Issue #2 - I will continue to own and live in the house. Re: Issue #3 - The accessory unit is planned for my 85 year old mother, who is in excellent health. It is also important to note that the plans for the addition were carefully designed by an architect to enhance the appearance of the existing house and compliment present neighborhood styles. This was done without any change to the existing footprint of the house and with unobtrusive roof line design. If the board is still not satisfied with the plans as presented and revised, I would like to apply for a variance in order to arrive at board approval. Sincerely, Q4�� (1-171 Elaine Greenfield 47 TtoctorAvenue, -South Bu dingtanMemwnt 05403. 802-864-9209 Elaine �reenfield `pianist April 17, 2001 Ms. Sarah MacCalium Dept. of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ms. MacCallum: In response to your letter of April 11.- Re: Issue #1- 30% rule, need to reduce square footage oR 2 :5 mi R Upon reviewing the plans submitted to your office on April 10th two facts presented themselves which will put the intended accessory unit well within 30% of the present structure, or very close, depending upon what is allowed. 1-1 realized that, in my haste, 330 sq. ft. of living space in the finished basement was overlooked when square footage was calculated. This brings the house to 174 sq. ft. (not 1416 ). (also, the garage at 24' x 24' and 1 1/2 bathrooms were not included) 2- 60 sq. ft. of the accessory unit is actually not intended as living space. It is closet area to be installed under the existing house roof. This would bring the accessory unit down from 540 sq. ft. to 480 sq. ft. If the 30 % rule is applied the unit then falls well within the limits. Re: Issue #2 - I will continue to own and live in the house. Re: Issue #3 - The accessory unit is planned for my 85 year old mother, who is in excellent health. It is also important to note that the plans for the addition were carefully designed by an architect to enhance the appearance of the existing house and compliment present neighborhood styles. This was done without any change to the existing footprint of the house and with unobtrusive roof line design. If the board is still not satisfied with the plans as presented and revised, I would like to apply for a variance in order to arrive at board approval. Sincerely, Elaine Greenfield 47 TtoctorAvenue•SouthBujhtr t n,(Vemwnt 054,03. 8oz-864-9209 Elaine Greenfield yianist APR 2 5 2m April 17, 2001 Ms. Sarah MacCallum Dept_ of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ms. MacCallum: In response to your letter of April 11: Re: Issue #1- 30% rule, need to reduce square footage Upon reviewing the plans submitted to your office on April 10th two facts presented themselves which will put the intended accessory unit well within 30% of the present structure, or very close, depending upon what is allowed. 1-1 realized that, in my haste, 330 sq. ft. of living space in the finished basement was overlooked when square footage was calculated. This brings the house to 1746 sq. ft. (not 1416 ). (also, the garage at 24' x 24' and 1 1 /2 bathrooms were not included) 2- 60 sq. ft. of the accessory unit is actually not intended as living space. It is closet area to be installed under the existing house roof. This would bring the accessory unit down from 540 sq, ft. to 480 sq. ft. If the 30 % rule is applied the unit then falls well within the limits. Re: Issue #2 - I will continue to own and live in the house. Re: Issue #3 - The accessory unit is planned for my 85 year old mother, who is in excellent health. It is also important to note that the plans for the addition were carefully designed by an architect to enhance the appearance of the existing house and compliment present neighborhood styles. This was done without any change to the existing footprint of the house and with unobtrusive roof line design. If the board is still not satisfied with the plans as presented and revised, I would like to apply for a variance in order to arrive at board approval. Sincerely, , Elaine Greenfield 47 Troctor_Avenue-South Buthngton,'Uermont ow3. 8o2-864-9209 f, ' : 11 I , •, 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 11, 2001 Elaine Greenfield 47 Proctor Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Conditional Use Application, 47 Proctor Avenue Dear Ms. Greenfield: Please find enclosed preliminary comments on the above referenced application. The project is currently scheduled to be considered by the Development Review Board on May 15, 2001. If you wish to respond to these comments or submit additional information, please do so no later than May 7, 2001. Please be sure that someone is at this meeting to represent your application. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Associate Planner Enclosure To: Applicants From: Sarah MacC allum, City of South Burlington RE: Project Staff Notes Date: April 11, 2001 CU-01-12 Greenfield -- Accessory Apartment, 47 Proctor Avenue Previous Action: None Overview: This project consists of adding a 540 square foot accessory apartment to an existing 1416 square foot single family house. Issues. The accessory apartment must be restricted to 30% of the size of the dwelling. The unit must be reduced to be no more than 424 square feet. ® The house must continue to be occupied by the owner. ® Occupancy of the accessory residential unit will be restricted to not more than two (2) persons, one of whom is related by blood or marriage to the owner of the primary single-family residence, or is disabled as deigned in subdivision 252(2) of Title 18, or is at least 55 years of age. Completeness of Plan: The applicant has submitted sufficient information for Development Review Board to consider the conditional use application at the May 15, 2001 meeting with the exceptions noted above. Additional information should be submitted no later than May 7, 2001. Recommendation: Staff recommends that this application be authorized to proceed for conditional use review. 24 i City of South Burlington Application to Development Review Board Official Use 5 Wn APPLICATION # GC.i -G ( - 1 Z HEARING DATE �� S�0 I FILING DATE L C� `�` L / FEE AMOUNT Name of applicant(s) Address rl/Lt�� ITelephone #/ Represented by Landowner (f 4r � a&45' 4i Location and description of property Adjacent property owner(s) & Address Typp of application check one: ( ) appeal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation) (. equest for a conditional use ( ) request for a variance ( ) other I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Provision of zoning ordinance in question 4A SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter H7, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, , at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: Application of seeking a from Section of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to REC E I I " -0 CLOR City of Sx Burlington ; i �a i Ct 'IV i �ccs� aC�—� c o2`tx as a `F a'fX4o , Room -4obr✓ oZ 40a.5e Toga( 11+1 � sf O I ih N �0 r DC NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE CONFIRMED IN FIELD. r OPLAN 1/8• ■ 11.09 ANX TBZMAC$ PROPOSED ADDITION FORT ARCErrEm GREENFIELD RESIDENCE E� �RI�2RIVE SO. BURLINGTON, VERMI vda 80ZFM20, fax 802M5617 GE ------------------————— — — — — —— 2'-11- D'N TOP ADD'N ------ 17--0" — — — FFL ADD'N 9'-0" RECER CRY of Soo Burlington OSOUTH ELEVATION 1/8, ■ 1'-01 REFERENCE DWG. ieo�u la �nni I _ I \ RIDGE ADD'N 24'-11" — — RIDGE HOUSE — — — 22'-3" TOP ADD'N 17'-0" — — — - --- ---------- FFL ADD'N— — _ _ _ _ _ FFL HOUSE 9'-0.--------------------------------- 9.-0. FFL —1'-8" 4 ac . psi � I ,l by s a fir, C0 of So. Burlington OEAST ELEVATION 1/8• 0 1'-0'