HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP-04-20 - Decision - 0004 Berard DriveCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
PA TRICK & TERESEAYER— 4 BERARD DRIVE
SITE PLAN #SP-04-20
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION
Patrick & Terese Ayer, hereafter referred to as the applicants, are requesting site plan
approval to amend a previously approved plan for a 9,868 sq ft mixed use building
consisting of auto repair and service use and automobile rental. The amendment consists
of. 1) eliminating auto rental use, 2) expanding auto service and repair use within the
building to 9,668 sq ft, 3) 200 sq ft of general office use, and 4) adding 11,200 cubic
yards of fill to expand parking area, 4 Berard Drive. This project was last reviewed on
October 1", 2002. This approval lapsed due to the lack of a zoning permit and revised
plans within six (6) months of the approval date. The Development Review Board held a
public meeting on June 15, 2004. Patrick Ayer represented the Applicants.
Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and
supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development
Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
l . The applicants are requesting site plan approval to amend a previously approved
plan for a 9,868 sq ft mixed use building consisting of auto repair and service use
and automobile rental. The amendment consists of 1) eliminating auto rental use,
2) expanding auto service and repair use within the building to 9,668 sq ft, 3) 200
sq ft of general office use, and 4) adding 11,200 cubic yards of fill to expand
parking area, 4 Berard Drive. This project was last reviewed on October 1 s , 2002.
This approval lapsed due to the lack of a zoning permit and revised plans within
six (6) months of the approval date.
2. The owners of record are Patrick and Terese Ayer.
3. The property lies within the Mixed Industrial & Commercial (IC) District.
4. The plans submitted consist of one (1) sheet entitled, "Site Plan for Autobahn
Body Works Inc. 4 Berard Drive South Burlington, VT", prepared by Sultan
Consulting, dated 2/20/04, last revised on 4/20/04.
-1-
,'ONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Table 1. DimensionalRequirements
IC Zoning District
Re wired
Proposed
Mn. Lot Size
40,000 SF
96,703 SF
Max. Building Coverage
40%
1.44%
Max. Total Coverage
70%
6.36%
Max. Front Yard Coverage
30%
14%
Mn. Front Setback
30 ft.
51 ft.
Mn. Side Setback
10 ft.
34 ft.
Min. Rear Setback
30 ft.
122 ft.
zoning compliance
SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS
Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the
following general review standards for all site plan applications:
(a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to
site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe
pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas.
The 9,868 square foot building is existing. According to Table 13-2 of the Land
Development Regulations, an automobile and motorcycle sales, service, and repair facility
requires two (2) parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA). The
proposed 9,686 square foot building will require twenty (20) parking spaces. The proposed
200 square feet of general office space will require one (1) parking space. Forty-six (46)
parking spaces are provided. Pursuant to Table 13-7 of the Land Development Regulations,
the subject property will require two (2) handicapped -accessible parking spaces. Only one
(1) handicapped -accessible space is provided.
During a recent site visit staff noticed that the parking spaces were not striped. These spaces
are striped on the plans under review.
(b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent
practicable.
The parking on the subject property currently exists and is located to the side and rear of the
existing building.
-2-
(c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the
height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or
adjoining buildings.
The height of the existing building is 20', which is consistent with the development on
surrounding properties.
(d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior
alterations or building expansions shall, to the extentfeasible, be underground
Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any newly installed
utility services and service modifications shall be underground.
(e) The DR& shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and
architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual
interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different
architectural styles
The subject building currently exists and the applicant has not proposed any changes.
09 Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and
to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the
proposed structures
The existing building is consistent with the terrain and the surrounding buildings in the area.
Site plan applications shall meet the following. specific standards as set forth in Section
14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations:
(a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to
abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts
onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or
other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area.
It is not necessary to create access to the properties that abut the subject property.
(b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections
shall be underground Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be
located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the
site.
Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines,
services, and service modifications shall be underground.
-3-
C
(c) All dumpsters and otherfacilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with
any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly
screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the
enclosure(s).
There are two (2) dumpsters on the site. The plans depict an enclosure for the dumpsters on
the northwesterly portion of the subject property. During a site visit, staff noticed that the
two (2) dumpsters were not within the enclosed area.
(d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements
The previous approval for the subject property required the applicant to plant thirty-two pine
trees, which are depicted on the plans. The applicant has stated that these costs $2,500 to
plant.
Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas
must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The
plans depict adequate snow storage areas.
Lighting
Pursuant to Section 13.07(A) of the Land Development Regulations, all exterior lighting
shall be shielded and downcasting to prevent light from spilling onto adjacent properties
and rights -of -way. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the lighting.
Access/Circulation
Access to the subject property is currently provided by a 20' wide curb -cut on Berard
Drive. No changes are proposed.
Circulation on the site is adequate.
Traffic
The proposed minor change of use will not alter the traffic on the subject property. Thus,
no additional traffic impacts fees are required.
Other
During a site visit staff noticed that the storage container depict on the plans to the
eastern side of the building in non-existent. In addition, staff noticed that there was some
type of trailer to the north of the "edge of gravel", as labeled on the plans.
The City Engineer reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated June
3, 2004.
-4-
Section 3.12 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the
following_ general review standards for all applications requesting approval for the alteration
of existing grade:
(1) The Development Review Board shall review a request under this Section for
compliance with the standards contained in this Section 3.12 and Section 3.07, Height of
Structures of these Regulations. An application under Section 3.12 shall include the
submittal of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat application
showing the area to be filled or removed, and the existing grade and proposed grade
created by removal or addition of material.
(2) The Development Review Board, in granting approval may impose any conditions it
deems necessary, including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Duration or phasing of the permit for any length of time.
The applicant is seeking approval for "as built" conditions, so this is not necessary.
(b) Submission of an acceptable plan for the rehabilitation of the site at the conclusion of
the operations, including grading, seeding and planting, fencing drainage, and other
appropriate measures.
The plans shall be revised to clearly indicate that the filled area will be seeded and
stabilized with additional top soil, prior to issuance of a zoning permit.
(c) Provision of a suitable bond or other security adequate to assure compliance with the
provisions of this Section.
The applicant shall post a bond, equal to the amount of the cost to seed and top soil the
filled area, which shall remain in effect for three (3) years, prior to issuance of a zoning
permit.
(d) Determination of what shall constitute pre -construction grade under Section 3.07,
Height of Structures.
The pre -construction grade of the filled area shall be the finished grade, as indicated on
the plans dated February 20, 2004.
-5-
DECISION
Motion by Gayle Quimby, seconded by Mark Boucher, to approve Final Plat Application
#SD-04-20 of Patrick & Terese Ayer, subject to the following conditions:
1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall
remain in effect.
2) The plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the
Administrative Officer. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted
to the Administrative Officer prior to zoning permit issuance.
a) The plans shall be revised to depict one (1) additional handicapped accessible
parking space, for a total of two (2).
b) The plans shall be revised to clearly indicate that the filled area will be seeded and
stabilized with additional top soil.
3) The paved parking spaces depicted on the plans shall be striped, prior to issuance of a
certificate of occupancy.
4) Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility
lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground.
5) The two (2) dumpsters shall be moved into the designated enclosed area on the
northwesterly portion of the property, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
6) The applicant shall post a $2,500 landscape bond prior to the issuance of the zoning
permit. This bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping
has taken root and has a good chance of surviving.
7) The applicant shall place topsoil and seed the sloped area of fill and post a bond, equal
to the amount of the cost to seed and topsoil the filled area, which shall remain in effect
for three (3) years, prior to issuance of a zoning permit.
8) All exterior lighting shall be shielded and downcasting to prevent light from spilling
onto adjacent properties and rights -of -way.
9) The storage container labeled on the plans shall be placed in the identified location,
and any additional storage containers shall be removed from the property, prior to
issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
10) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months of this decision
pursuant to Section 17.04 of the Land Development Regulations, or this approval is null
and void.
11) The applicant shall obtain a certificate of occupancy from the Administrative Officer
prior to the use of the filled area.
12) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington
Development Review Board.
Chuck Bolton - yea/nay/abstain/not present
Mark Boucher - yeWnay/abstain/not present
John Dinklage - yea/nay/abstain/not present
Roger Farley - yeWnay/abstain/not present
Michele Kupersmith - yea/nay/abstain/not present
Larry Kupferman - yea/nay/abstain/not present
Gayle Quimby - yeWnay/abstain/not present
Motion Carried by a vote of 6-0-0.
Signed on this /7 day of Tu K-0 , 2004 by
-A"'L) e �2'"
Gayle Quimby, Clerk
Please note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental
Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRCP 76 in writing, within 30 days of the date this
decision is issued. If you fail to appeal this decision your right to challenge this decision
at some point in the future may be lost because you waited too long. You will be bound
by the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy; finality).
-7-