Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
VR-82-0000 - Supplemental - 0393 Patchen Road
September 15, 1982 Frank Cota 97 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Cota: Enclosed is a copy of the South Burlington Planning Commission's final approval with stipulations and findings of fact for your new building at 397 Patchen Road. You must submit a revised site plan and make arrangements for bonding before a building permit may be issued. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, David ff. Spitz, City Planner DHS/mcg 1 Enc 1 r z sp . Vol( M, J.C.�4kS- rA aly) ILPILtb REVIBION6 BV 'L .5 NI 1)_ i e. A 1) 1 NI G ; L I• -I C- 1) U L L- PL4WTIwLI LaTIN tiiOMlr - �- PMITMC T. . -1)I T1 o Njj mumeev YM.IC',r FSI Y•F RA GL •, AS SHOWW GN RLPOW7 -Wo TE S: ALL (J,MCA151O►IS TO ICE 1E171F1c�) A-j 1)1111� rellm ^ yE1lJ TiY•.. - , 14' - 4S • :1.1--tC i 11UItLAy - - F' LtCb,T, O,•t' _ THE 71TF R1'. T;Is tt'nITVA-^*04. ANV iRC1cP _ca Pt,4Nj3 Iu 4,EbTIGu I',CS; OE QDATJ /MPA!r FEE: *Z aae,00 - YLFERQGc TA TM 4 APCH1rECj r--pR A _. -D EC I OION 9Ef°7E PR 061.E 01 NC WITS FDOT PIaImTS;0B ENT-CAN09IES-5HCLVN 7'6E )OVIC, RCAQ AnDIT1oNT0 PUA4E SHcwu USES ijQCAILooWPt: REF NaTEi oppaslrc 4AC4 ©5M.rLDCI. YVCS76r6A17A4E 3UILDIN4(Al2MV IOINTy) -- ADe1T1oN-5�tolUµ, __ LANASCAPIn1L; EM13TG AS 5H6Wp ExcEPT I- NEW Sc2up,,S IN FRONT ON WiLUTAI¢ No.I SOUTHEQLY CU¢g CUT: re &C r?EDUC£DASSHoIW. ° o ° o `�ARKI IVG 'SPACES; 46 51,Fl[ES NEC-I>Eq- S2 SNOWN. HANDICAPPED 5PA[C-S A°. 5HovjK, FRONT VA06 CtOE014CE; COVEVACE 2241, SF, © So' FPOHTYARD= 242,8 X !,o - 'T2845.r ° 2741 S.F. _ 7264 =3C%4av"4LE. 1:KTC171012 LIGHTING.; G,11A,PouxI2 Tr P¢oU10E _' - != - CkT�VICQ LILHTL OH PClk1-E%ea%N LILM1 , -- h ' _ LXIS(G 3, 8oV>,L�Aey� QT.y.R LIdNjS-REPtPGE � O v _DOAPSTEQ: AS SH4LJ1,1 ON PLAN. n ° nrymUs r-MpLaJEC-5; P.C-M�-Lo1(EC5 = • R - SEaJ Lr7 CITt-01I. F • utLDIyG N0..2-..lSoo3.Is/FLOCQ, ° 350IXI1E1,1 .-F.rDSA_541 MEOM -Newt. 5jn¢AD E g;"Ic 5• F, • J3S..FL000: bL�GICi1?E..fl$L`.4S03i�.CNlE7j'AIn7AlNT.SgAPT-IEt. --- _ YATCN RA3li=YE PAI¢ - ; So S , F. -SAMM ltS IN11MITE9 - 90o S, F -31445 MAR:SE_AIETTICmNuo- 96OS,F, Ns'` - --=.�ECIIEiS77iSa-=7�1tTtE OpsvnTloH. 1VnE: WCW PLRNT4 IN pROUI OF BVILDIN4 1.Io,I F -fl-r4-RTH BUILDI044 NO,4 - 12oO S.F. VT, 14EAMPOQIVM Igoe 5,F, -2Nn FLOCK APA127MENI NC. I LOo s, r ,AvAnTAAr-NT Ho, 2 ___ co S, F OLI o O o C ° O FF TiU�n41N4 o_ __J5UTTDlN4 'Rlo. 1 - 6A J( S.F, - - _ _$US 5FAVCHEIAOQ - 3T )G S,F ZBEATIVE MUCH - 16 bo S,r, 3AP ELECLCIt.:CC, - lol°o S,F_ MA�_ L_5PAM-_212O 5,F,- =EJT.112 =r-H--UI7NITVRC WEPAIR F AQKI4 G TA ISLE I U3m1t5s W,Iwgl: TRUCK" - 3QFLAQM }A?Y4$1, -$"VJLDIN4 Na• i - 15 ! EV EATME TOUCH 2. I -. __ _.. 2}1 • 9 -.1 N F eLEC reIC CO. j L IeGP_ S.F 444- b i�-FFABI:-.3LZ14 7iCo rL 3 - s S CHLA�dA]i�PTtEPA12 I -. _ - _- - 1 _ 2 i�$TS.DAIIIhITED -.-. AySCbIC?:-mCvAN-Oo ;llllt-- I._. }„CIQDURDCQAT09LLAMX#P1N4 'S - S _ St3•(° $I1JLDl NG "M& 4. -VT,-HEmPaEIUm AT'AQTAACI.TT�1'zwoFluR _ ___ -z -APPTTAAeRT_Ot L- 2ADJLWP 13rAL :D wmz T3VIL911V4 90,3 - 1894 5,1, - PPANe5 6APA4E - 6&4 S.F 'D-UND CONTROL LAninSCAPi*14- lo2C S,p 0 O b 2S2.n' N.v.a t: DUTAPSTER a u �- uSTCP�L! O FV�SK 5 -e111J11 Wit"% i.1e,i 7pA-11IIdJ,W it v o 0 -- - P t A ►4 a SEP .5 0 1996 City of So. Burlington .-i14N71u C(}Y7TtM7 iNL. LLT• -17T. lUP.t¢ Mt1AL SALtAt -f1°T Yby -12— Al \\ 1tlAkWALTVZtb -@v _ I'' Lt4M LIA4 _19JItN7. .lYL. j Aa myr AZ21i.ZWL1I�MIT4a. . 2 If210 J T am..H[ f -� �t A1Al1M tmT-wjA1g--Saf AAeoL5 cp�:aLt• -_ buliMaL_ A UL- 7A ';5 I INCH Tu KrT 95is�tio. LiTF. pAMR4 5rACC-S tK IUN- PLAN 52 S(ACCS -:-::A,arzlxT 6 NOTES P BETE LOCATION- ... aa i w` LOCUS LEGEND PROPOSED EXESTImo PROPERTY LINE - - - — - - - EASEMENT LINE - - - - - - - - - - - WETLAND LIMIT..«...........,...,..,,,,,,,,.. ... .................................. BUFFER ZONE -- -- - BUILDING SETBACK CONTOUR —vL— ------ IN--- -- PEDESTAL a 6 CLEANOUT o O SANITARY SEWER M.M. (' STORM SEWER M.H. ;p) STORM SEWER INLET p D HYDRANT T v GATE VALVE x W SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER -sr—rr cur __. sr._. _..rr Lw.... ,- WATER SUPPLY —A'N— -- FOOT' G DRAW - ROOF ROOF DRAIN CURTAIN DRAIN -ro W - - _ FORCE MAINELECTRIC POWER -[ ...E.. CABLE T.V. -I,— OVERHEAD WOE — NATURAL CAS - TELEPHONE -r .. r. _.. _• _ -_ BARB WIRE FENCE CHAIN LINK FENCE-0� -----0--- S70CKADE FENCE —o—o— -_.:,..,___._ TREE LINE rvwvWvw� rvvvy-vvyvv� EDGE OF WATER CENTER LINE —._._ _. GUARD RAIL _ _ _ ...,,.... .. LUMINMRE f b UTILITY POLE / Ly SIGN T Irtwswus wrc THE USER SHALL IIAT" IM4 -1 C 11- - LATEST KNAW EXISTING BUILDING NO.. 4 - 2400 SF. IST FLOOR - WILLISTON RD. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT - Y200 Sf, 2ND FLOOR APARTMENT NO. I - 600 SF 2ND FLOOR APARTMENT Na 2 - 600 SF. PROPOSED BUILDING NO, 4 - 2400 SF. IST FLOOR APARTMENT NO I - 800 SF. + IST FLOOR APARTMENT Na 2 -600 SF ' 2W FLOOR APARTMENT NO, 1 - 600 Sr. " 2ND FLOOR APAR7MEN7 AIO 2 - 500 SF r 4 " GRASS GRASS -- AREA v 1' AREA .A BUILO,NG L NO 4 O A !x. v 1 BUILD/NC NO 1 - B96 S.F. . _ J k P ELECTRIC- 3798 SF. LOOMS PROPERTY MANAGEMEN ANAGEMENT f060 S.F. ; WILL/STOW R0. PROPERTY MANAGCMfNT - f080 S.F. CONC. LIGHT \r\ .A y t O CONC,.. LIGHTS 7� CONCRETE BOLLARDS BUILDING NO. J - 1884 SF, RICH BARRETT STORAGE - 884 S.F. LEMIEUX SECURITY - 1020 SF. BUILDING NO, / BIKE RACK i- LIGHT \ GRAVEL "PARK NG-�� v\ � • " . � ,- moo. EXIS77NO 1 DUMPSTER 1 LIGHT V , I I , s _ I e LIGHTS I I 1 � 7 BNIO 120. Qv-; V/ll I ^ 7 n•a e o _ J T F � ! o tI r �_ Patchen Road PARKING TABLE BUSINESS SOFT. AREA P. SPACES BUILDING NO, I 3796 SF J & P ELECTRIC CO. JOO .IJ SPACES LOOM/S PROPERTY MOMT. 169ID60 Sr WILLISTON RD PROPERTY MOMT 300 .9 SPACES BUILDING NO. 2 FRANK C07A NEON 2 SPACES WILLISTON RD, PROPERTY MOMID 7 SPACES MARSCAKI TAEKNONDO ' A40HT OPERATION (SHARED 8 SPACES PARKING) BUILDING NO. J RICH BARRETT STORAGE I SPACE LEMIEUX SECURITY 3 SPACES BUILDING N0. 4 APARTMENT 07-1ST FLOOR 2 SPACES PER UNIT APARTMENT 42-IST FLOCR 2 SPACES PER UIWT APARTMENT 6T-2MD FLOOR 2 SPACES PER UNIT APARTMENT /2-2ND FLOOR 2 SPACES PER UNIT I SPACE 52 SPACES TOTAL A NOTE PARKING SPACES SHOWN ON PLAN = 52 1. OWNER OF RECORD: FRANK J AND ANNA G. COTA 97 AIRPORT PARKWAY S. BURLINGTON. VT, 2. APPLICANT: JACK ASSOCIATES RT 7 MILTON, VT 0546E 1 ZONED: R2 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CONVERT BUILDING NO. 4, IST FLOOR OFFICE SPACE INTO 2 000 S.F. APARTMENTS 5. EXIS71NO PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION FROM PLAN ENTITLED "PROPERTY PLAN EVELYN LAMPLOUGH 50 BURLINCTON VERMONT" BY WEBSTER-MARTIN INC. DATED 1219175 8. BUILDING CONFIGURATIONS AND LOCATIONS INFORMATION BY BUTTON ASSOCIATES, 4049 MLOSTON ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON. VT. OCTOBER 2001. FRONT YARD COVERAGE COVERAGE 2241 SF, JO' FRONT YARD - 7583 SF. GREEN SPACE - 1717 SF = 22Z COVERAGE 7S83 S.F. TOTAL COVERAGE AREA = 78Y. COVERAGE PIRLDING NO, ? • ,dUU ,,.,/FLOOR Y'•: ,r is F. CO TA . 900 IF -NEON SIGNS STORAGE. 900 S.F. IS7 FLOOR.• WILLISTON RD. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT - 1800 S.F. 2ND FLOOR: MARSCAK/ rAEKWONDO . 18W SF RECREATION - NIGHT OPERATION 4YIIr NUV 9 2001 A'ORAyVrc ref SC. Bisrlington GRAPHIC SCALE m IN FEET I Inch _ 20 ft. .� "7 Patchen Road sift Plan LLEWELLYN •HOWLEY! R°'"'' p0" DATE: Wiwi INC 0RV0RATS0 9'WOYNRWWSwYf , wp;Rryg1T"INO , CtNWLT7H& S'EAVlt= ASAS yLr1F,l,YgTCW INGFON TF.RR-W"SS%B S0'JTf§8i/RL6W T ilG:a3 2A59 VBRM6NT" 9149E it£r+wY9N$PolTdfn DRAM IV: NIT ORAM40: Bmicl 161 SHEET', I " 1 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 18, 1996 Bob Beauchemin 72 Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Retail Use, 397 Patchen Road Dear Mr. Beauchemin: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on October 8, 1996. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please giv me a call. i cere , J i , C' y Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Gordon Woods City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 18, 1996 Bob Beauchemin 72 Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Retail use, 397 Patchen Road Dear Mr. Beauchemin: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the October 8, 1996 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please gi JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Gordon Woods ve me a call. City Planner PLANNING COMMISSION 8 October 1996 page 9 8. Site plan application of Bob Beauchemin to convert 3460 sq. ft. of a 6396 sq. ft. mixed use commercial building from light manufacturing to a retail use. This lot is developed with 3 other mixed use commercial buildings and an accessory structure, 397 Patchen Road: Mr. Beauchemin noted he is changing one non -conforming use for another. Mr. Burgess advised that the Zoning Board had given a use variance on this. Mr. Burgess noted that one curb cut is being reduced from 90 ft. to 36 ft. in width. Traffic will be increasing with the new use. This is a non -conforming building with setback problems, but it did not appear anything would be made worse. Mr. Beauchemin said he had worked out a plan with the City En- gineer to reduce the curb cut closest to Williston Rd. Mr. Burgess asked how the curb cut will be defined since it is not paved. Mr. Beauchemin said he would use railroad ties and plantings. Mr. Beauchemin said GMP has a pole with old style flood lights which will be changed. There is also one on the building which will be replaced with a downcasting fixture. There will be three handicapped parking spaces. There will also be a bike rack. The dumpster will be enclosed on 3 sides. Mr. Dinklage asked if there will be any changes to the structure. Mr. Beauchemin said there will not. They will only paint. The plan is for this to be a used merchandise store. Mr. Crow moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Bob Beauchemin to convert 3460 sq. ft. of a 6396 sq. ft. mixed use commercial building from light manufacturin to retail use. This lot is developed with three other mixed use commercial buildings and an accessory structure, 397 Patchen Road, as depicted on a plan entitled "New Retail Use - Condominiums Frank Cota 397 Patchen Road, Existing Property South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Gordon Woods, Architect, dated August, 1995, last revised 9/20/96, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not super- seded by this approvalshall remain in effect. PLANNING COMMISSION 8 October 1996 page 10 2. All new exterior lighting shall be downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. As expressly represented by the applicant, the applicant shall replace the two existing flood lights (one pole mounted and one building mounted) with downcasting shielded fixtures. 3. For purposes of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estim- ates that the proposed use will generate 14 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 5. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compli- ance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the converted space. 6. Any change to the site plan shall require a roval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Mr. Dinkla e seconded. The motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 9: 30 p.m. Clerk 10/8/96 MOTION OF APPROVAL BOB BEAUCHEMIN I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Bob Beauchemin to convert 3460 square feet of a 6396 square foot mixed use commercial building from light manufacturing to retail use. This lot is developed with three (3) other mixed use commercial buildings and an accessory structure, 397 Patchen Road, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "New Retail Use - Condominiums Frank Cota 397 Patchen Road, Existing Property South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Gordon Woods, Architect, dated August, 1995, last revised 9/20/96, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. All new exterior lighting shall be downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. As expressly represented by the applicant, the applicant shall replace the two (2) existing flood lights (one (1) pole mounted and one (1) building mounted) with downcasting shielded fixtures. 3. For purposes of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the proposed use will generate 14 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 5. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the converted space. 6. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Memorandum October 8, October 4, Page 5 - Planning 1996 agenda items 1996 Sewer: No additional sewer allocation needed. Dumpster: A screened dumpster storage area is provided. Lighting: No additional lighting proposed. 8) BOB BEAUCHEMIN - RETAIL USE - SITE PLAN This project consists of converting 3460 square feet of a 6396 square foot mixed use commercial building from light manufacturing to retail use. This lot is developed with three (3) other mixed use commercial buildings and an accessory structure. The ZBA on August 12, 1996 granted the applicant a use variance to convert the space from one nonconforming use to another nonconforming use. This property is in a residential district. This property located at 397 Patchen Road lies within the R4 District. It is bounded on the north and west by undeveloped land, on the south by residences and on the east by Patchen Road. Access/circulation: This property is egress curb approximately The northerly cuts on Patchen Road. 90 feet wide and will be curb cut is 36 feet in Circulation on the site is adequate. served by two ( 2 ) ingress and The southerly curb cut is reduced in width to 36 feet. width. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 21% (maximum allowed is 20%). Overall coverage is 77% (maximum allowed is 40%). Front yard coverage is 70% (maximum allowed is 30%). All coverages are existing and will not be made worse by this application. The note on the plan referring to front yard coverage should be revised to note that the front yard coverage is 70% not 30%. The mixed residential/commercial buildings (buildings #3 and 4) and the accessory building do not meet the rear setback requirement. This is an existing situation which is not changing. Parking: A total of 48 parking spaces are required and 52 spaces including three (3) handicapped spaces are available. A bike rack will be provided as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. 61 Memorandum - Planning October 8, 1996 agenda items October 4,1996 Page 6 Landscaping: There is no minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, for this project. Applicant is proposing to plant some foundation plantings consisting of Dense Yew with an estimated value of $315. Traffic: ITE estimates that the change is use will result in 14 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee will be approximately $2800. Sewer: No additional sewer allocation needed. Dumpster: The dumpster storage area will be screened. Lighting: Two (2) existing flood one (1) building mounted) will shielded fixtures. The pole li supplied "cobra head" fixture. will be replaced with a 175 downcasting shielded fixture. The also consist of 175 watt metal fixtures. 0 lights, ( one (1) pole mounted and be replaced with downcasting ght will be replaced with a GMP The building mounted floodlight watt metal halide lamp with a new building mounted lights will halide lamps with downcasting City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 4, 1996 Bob Beauchemin 72 Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Retail Use, 397 Patchen Road Dear Mr. Beauchemin: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Wally Possich were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 8, 1996 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Joe Weith, `�16 City Planner JW/mcp Encls cc: Gordon Woods -1) p�� ji,/�,/ .err Twin State Signs, Inc. 14 Gauthier Dr. Essex Jct., VT 05452-2825 TO ` 4 E5k-en2 ., ��• C .ram` .._...... ......._......_.3.....,- ,_�� � �.S.......... ....... ..ZNC........ ........ ..... ............ .t'. o............. Q,,�,..�1 . c a @4 �� _ , _�SQ . ....... ._ ...........� -GAA sicNe PLEASE REPLY NO REPLY NECESSARY CHAPTER XIV ENERGY CONSERVATION As the City of South Burlington continues to grow access to energy will play an important role. Energy and access to energy are vital to a thriving economy and community. The cost of energy adds to the cost of living and doing business, therefore energy conservation and lower energy prices help make the City attractive to both homeowners and businesses. Energy is also a natural resource, to be used effectively and efficiently. South Burlington is attempting to become a more pedestrian - oriented city. The development of foot and bicycle paths, green ways and other trails provides alternative ways of accessing the City's commercial, residential and recreation areas. With the development of City Center, the City is taking steps to make the use of public transportation easier. The City Center_, with its mix of commercial and residential uses, will promote walking and therefore reduce the need for automobiles. The encouragement of Planned Unit Developments allows for a more effective public transportation system. These developments also allow for comprehensive designs that support the use of energy conserving measures. The importance of energy efficiency is recognized and addressed in other sections of the Comprehensive Plan including Housing, Recreation, Transportation, and Public Utilities and Services. A. RECOMMENDATIONS 24 V.S.A., Section 4302(c) (7) states that a goal of planning is to "encourage the efficient use of energy and the development of renewable energy resources." 1. The City should encourage innovative site planning tech- niques to enhance energy efficiency including the clustering of buildings, maximizing access to solar energy, and energy saving designs such as earth bermed buildings. 2. The City should encourage use of site landscaping design that makes use of deciduous trees close to buildings, parking lots, etc., to provide shade during the summer and allow access to sun light during the winter months, and evergreen trees should be placed so as to act as wind breaks. 3. The City should move ahead with the mixed use City Center plan as well as consider mixed use zoning along Shelburne and Williston Road to allow for both residential and commercial development in order to promote pedestrian movement. 4. Public buildings shall be designed and improved to be energy efficient. E-IM ��� �- � �T� �� �� /�� X 7. S- %i5 / hotometric Data MUIRFIELD SERIFS& -him MODEL MUM-A-400-SMH-F 0 LAMP: 40OW SUPER METAL HALIDE DISTRIBUTION: A -Asymmetrical LENS: FLAT GLASS ITL REPORT: ITL32706 SINGLE I rr 4MH 3MH 2MH 1MH IMH 2, IMH 4C k I L - - � F• � • JJ IMH J Ci r 4MH 3MH 2MH IMH 0 1MH 2MH 3MH 4MH 1l`• I,� F,C. P Mounting Configuration Foot Candle Values F r The Fj6llowing Curves Height A 8 C D E F G 12' Single 13.89 5.56 2,78 1.39 0.56 0.28 0.14 14' Single 10.20 4.08 2.04 j 1.02 0.41 0.20 0.10 16' Single 7.81 3.13 1.56 ' 0.78 0.31 0.16 0.08 18, Single 6.17 2.47 1.23 0.62 0.25 0.12 0.06 20' Single 5.00 2.00 1.00 0.20 0.10 0.05 22' Single 4.13 1.65 0.83 _0.50 0.41 0.17 0.08 0.04 single 3.47 1.39 0.69 0.35 0.14 0.07 663 26' Single 2.96 1.18 0.59 0.30 0.12 0.06 0.03 28' Single 2.55 1.02 0.51 0.26 010 005 0.03 30' Sinoie 2.22 0089 0.44 0.22 0._�9 0.04 0.02 MH-Mounting Height Noting systems iflon 4201 Maisbary Rd. • F.O. Box 42728 • Cincinnati, OH 45242 Telex 628353t39 (513) 793-0147 (513) 793-3200 notometric Data "AUIRFIELD SERIFS MODEL: MUS-A-175-SMH-F LAMP: 175W SUPER METAL HALIDE DISTRIBUTION: A -Asymmetrical LENS: FLAT GLASS ITL REPORT: ITL32704 • SINGLE Q\\-l f3 j I P C D E F G -1-T FRONT 3MH 2MH IMH IMH IMH 21 ' ��Ixw IMH p L1',,6 4MH 3MH 2MH IMH 0 IMH 2MH 3MH 4MH Y' t�%I tG Mounting Configuration Foot Candle Values For The Following Curves Height A 8 C I D E F G Fk c; _ 12' Single 13.89 5.56 2.78 1 1.39 1 0.56 0.28 0.14 14' Single 10.20 4.08 2.04 11.02 0.41 0.20 0.10 16' Slnole 7.81 3.13 1.56 0.78 0.31 0.16 0C13 18' Single 6.17 2.47 1.23 0.62 0.25 0.12 0.06 _ 20' Single 5.00 2.00 1.00 6.50 0.20 0.10 0.05 22' Single 4.13 1.65 0.83 0.41 0.17 0.08 0.04 4 Sngie 3.47 1.39 0.6 0.14 0.07 0.03 26' Single 2.96 1.18 0.59 0.30 0.12 0.06 0.03 _ 28' Single 2.55 1.02 0.51 0.26 0.10 0.05 0.03 30' Single 2.22 0.89 0.44 0.22 0 Cl? O.C-1 0 02 MI -Mounting Height �{ C figiming systems inn. 4201 Malsbary Rd. • F O. Box 42728 • Cincinnati, OH 45242 Telex 62838369 Fax (513) 733-0147 (513) 793-3200 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 September 13, 1996 Bob Beauchemin 72 Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Retail Use, 397 Patchen Road Dear Mr. Beauchemin: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced projects from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, September 27, 1996. If you have any questions, please give me a call. sincq ely R ymdnd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls Preliminary comments October 8, 1996 Agenda Items September 13, 1996 JOHN LARKIN & GERALD MILOT - RELOCATE BUILDING #4 - REVISED FINAL PLAT --- submit a landscaping plan of the entire residential site showing all existing and proposed landscaping. --- plan should show Fayette Road as currently constructed (i.e., no cul-de-sac, road extended to northerly boundary, etc.) --- if overall coverage has changed, submit new numbers. BOB BEAUCHEMIN - RETAIL USE - SITE PLAN --- provide detailed breakdown of all uses in all the buildings on the property including square footages (for parking calculations). --- show locations of all proposed landscaping and include a planting schedule which indicates the plant species, size and quantity. --- the southerly curb cut is much wider than shown on the plan. This curb cut should be reduced in width to 36 feet maximum. --- plan should show parking spaces which conforms to the parking lot dimensions in Exhibit 26A of the zoning regulations. The number of spaces shown should be adequate for the number of spaces required by the existing and proposed uses. --- handicapped spaces should also be shown. --- provide front yard coverage calculation. --- provide exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for all existing and proposed lights (lights should be downcasting and shielded). --- the flood lights located on the pole along the south boundary and at the rear of the northerly building should be replaced by downcasting shielded fixtures. --- if a dumpster will be used, it should be shown and screened. --- provide the number of employees who previously occupied space to be converted to retail use (for sewer credit). --- a bike rack should be provided as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. --- the applicant should be aware that the road impact fee will be approximately $2800. --- plan should be revised to accurately depict the footprints of all existing buildings. Plan does not show: 1) the three (3) entrance canopies to the retail building, 2 ) the rear addition to the "existing garage", and 3) the small building located to the west of the addition to the garage. C M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: October 8, 1996 Agenda Items Date: September 3, 1996 L&M PARK - SHELBURNE ROAD Site plans prepared by FitzPatrick-Llewellyn with latest revision dated 7/11/96 is acceptable. TYGATE PROPERTIES - WILLISTON ROAD 1. There exists drainage inlets in rear parking lot some of which drain into area to be filled. These should be shown on the site plan. 2. The overflow parking area in the north-east corner should also be shown on the site plan. 3. The area to be filled is heavily wooded with large trees. Some near the top of the fill area may be saved. 4. The storage shed in rear is a lot larger than shown on the plan. NEW FLEA MARKET - FRANK COTA - PATCHEN ROAD Site plan prepared by Gordon Woods dated July, 1996 is acceptable. CRANE PROPERTY - SHELBURNE ROAD Site plan prepared by Krebs & Lansing received July 12, 1996 is acceptable. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Wallace Possich, South Burlington Fire Chief Re: Plans Reviewed for October 8, 1996 Agenda Date: September 11, 1996 I have reviewed the listed site plans and my comments are as follows: 1. L&M Park Fayette Road Acceptable 2. Tygate Properties 1076 Williston Road Acceptable 3. Addition to Garage Patchen Road Acceptable 4. Crane Property 1335 Shelburne Road Acceptable Dated 7/11/96 Project No. 88047 Dated 8/5/96 Project No. 8779 Dated 7/12/96 Project No. 80231-B f(b �fbo S F. �'E7,4/L A-r- Act, � -(, F) / /,/ /A, 6 r-A,- /V 0 (-)1-6 PERMITTED INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT 40 3 5 .......................... -.................. -...... -.......................... -........................................................................ . .............................. 30 ...........................................................................................................-..........-----................................. .............................. 25 ................. _.__. �_._....____ _ ._- .__..__ _ .- .__.._ ._._....----- ----------------------------- .......................... 20 O ............................................................................................................................................................. ............................... 15 .................. —..... ------------- --------------------------- ---- ------ ---------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------ -----............................... 0 10 ........... ... -.... -.......................................................................... ..... .................. -.................. .......... ............ -................. 5 --._.._._._...—.. ............... .... _......._ .-....-........-. ...... .......-- .................... 0 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 YEAR FIGURE B-6 TOTAL PERMITTED COM/IND/INST DEVELOPMENT 600 w500 ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 400 .......... ................ .... .......................... ............. -........................................ .......---.......................... ........................... cy Y) w300 .................... ................ .................................... -.................................. ..... ................................................................ 0 200 ..... ................................................................................................................................................................ 0 100 ..................................... _................... ..... .-.................................................................................. - ......... 0 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 YEAR FIGURE B-7 !( J, 6 r-'I 0 (- / /,-- /,P? / Id SITE PLAN CHECK LIST --- Lot drawn to scale --- Survey data (distances and lot size) --- Contours (existing and finished). --- Existing vegetation and natural features. --- Proposed landscaping (number, variety and size) equal or greater than the required amount in section 19.104 of the Zoning Regulations. --- Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings. --- Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. --- Zoning boundaries --- Number and location of parking spaces. (RV parking for multi- family projects over 25 units). --- Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. --- Location of septic tanks (if applicable). --- Location of any easements. --- Lot coverage information: Building, overall and front yard. --- Location of site (Street # and lot #). --- North arrow --- Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. --- Exterior lighting details (must be downcasting and shielded). --- Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened). --- Existing and proposed sidewalks (public). - f Sewer calculation --- Height of new construction. --- Setbacks (residential district, planned r.o.w., Interstate). --- C.O. Zone --- Bike racks --- Traffic generation --- Traffic Impact fees --- PUD/PCD standards - Airport Approach cone --- Outside storage/display --- F.A.R. --- Lot merger agreement --- Setback from planned r.o.w. --- If boundary line adjustment, need subdivision? --- Nonresidential use setback from Residential District FORM NR-1 COMPUTATION OF TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES PROJECT DATA: (1) "EFFECTIVE DATE" FOR TAX CREDITS: (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS vph (3) ESTIMATED PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From current tax 2 assessment) 1��� units (4) TOTAL FLOOR AREA AFTER Al�� CONSTRUCTION S.f. ( 5 ) TYPE OF USE V � (6) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IMPACT FEES: (7) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (From Form NR-2) 079 FORM NR-2 COMPUTATION OF ROAD IMPACT FEES (1) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE PER PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP END (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS (From form NR-1) (3) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE (1) x (2) (4) PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (from line (3) of Form NR-1) (5) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE (From Table ST-3) $ (6) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS (4) x (5) (7) POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From line (8) on Form NR-3) _ (8) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE (From Table ST-4) $ (9) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS (7) X (8) (10) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (3) - (6) - (9) $ 221.72 / vte vte units / unit $ lo�,57D units / unit $o�, �� FORM NR-3 ESTIMATION OF POST CONSTRUCTION VALUE (1) TYPE OF USE (From line (5) on form NR-1) (2) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (from line (6) on Form NR-1 (3) TOTAL FLOOR AREA (From line (4) on Form NR-1) (4) ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT (From Table ST-5) (5) ESTIMATED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS (3) x (4) (6) LAND VALUE (From current tax records) (7) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE (5) + (6) (8) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (7) / $1,000 s.f. units i PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 14, 1982 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, September 14, 1982 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; George Mona, Robert Walsh, Kirk Woolery Member Absent Peter Jacob Others Present David Spitz, Planner; Doug Schner, Dan & Leo O'Brien, Jill Bergeron, Sandra O'Brien, Red Elmore, Frank Cota, Gordon Woods, Roger Dickenson, William Shearer, Art Pappas, Bruce Eddy, Richard Gracey, Kim O'Brien, Christopher Conant, Gail Simons, Bill Claussen, Gisele Bjerke, Stephen Page, Doug Fitzpatrick, Carl Lisman, Mervin Brown, William Rowell, Ronald Schmucker, Lowell Krassner, Judy Hurd, The Other Paper; Charles Monti, Kim Morrow Minutes of September 7, 1982 The September 7, 1982 minutes were approved on a motion by Mr. Woolery, a second by Mr. Walsh and a unanimous vote. Site plan b rank Cot fora 3600 s . ft. building for small business at 397 Patchen Roa __ Mr. Spitz said this had been approved by the Zoning Board. The area is zoned residential but the character is commercial, and the existing building houses small businesses now. Mr. Woods, representing Mr. Cota, said the front of the new building would line up with the existing one. The question of curb cuts was discussed. The lot now has three and the Commission wondered about cutting down on the number. Mr. Cota said the middle one was used by trucks getting into the building across the street and the southerly one was used for truck access to the existing building. He suggested leaving the cuts as they were now and offered to close one later if it became a problem. Widening two of the cuts and eliminating one was discussed. Mr. Poger asked if there would be retail uses in the building and was told there would not be. Mr. Cota was asked to move plantings from the rear of the lot and put them against the building instead. He said that was fine. He said he was going to be choosy about tenants - it will be a quiet operation. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application by Frank Cota for a 3600 sq ft building at 397 Pe+nnon Pnoa na apnintpa nn A. n1an entitled "New Small Business Bu ldlne. Frank Cota Owner", prepared by Gordon subject to the following stipulations: 1. The five new maples at the rear of the property shall be replaced by equivalent plantings at a more visible location on the Revised landscaping shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner rior to _ of a building permit. 2. PLANNING COIC4ISSION SEPTEMBER 14, 1982 2. A $900 landscaping bond shall be provided. 3. If in the future internal or external traffic conditions warrant, and the Planning Commission deems it necessary, the closing of 1 curb cut shall be required. 4. This approval expires in 6 months. The motion was seconded by Mr. Mona and carried unanimously. Continuation of preliminary plat application by V.L. Properties, Inc., for a 4.9 acre planned commercial development on Dorset St. Mr. Spitz said the city's traffic consultant had evaluated the traffic report submitted by the applicant. He said the Commission had to decide whether to evaluate this development on its own from the report, or look at the Dorset St. corridor as a whole in combination with developments like Corporate Circle and University Mall. The latter is the option he preferred, noting that it would delay the application, but not unreasonably long. He felt that street was critical and that although this development was smaller than the other two mentioned, it was still a large development. Mr. Poger noted that the Commission had briefly discussed this point last week and had agreed that it preferred the second option. Mr. Page, representing the developer, said their position was unchanged from the way he had presented it at the last meeting. They feel that the city can control a project such as Corporate Circle by requiring each lot to come back to the city and they also feel that their development will not change the level of service at peak hours. He wondered what would be done with the results of a study of Dorset St. as a whole, what the results would be, and who would participate. He noted that although Mr. Spitz had stated that he felt such a report could be ready by November 1, it might take time to digest it. Mr. Poger felt the Commission had to do some long range planning with the road in order to be sure that traffic on it did not just come to a halt one day. I,1r. Mona felt the city was now incrementally creating another Williston Road on Dorset St., and he felt the Commission and City Council should review the matter. The Commission needs a commitment or decision on what the Council intends to do here, and it needs to decide what road improvements are needed here, so getting them done equitably can be worked out with a sort of "master plan" for the road. Mr. Schner noted that several developers in the area, plus the city, had had traffic reports done on the area. He hoped that nothing in the city's new study would negate any approvals obtained for Corporate Circle, which he represented. He did not want to be required to go back and re -do the study he had done and Mr. Poger said he could not imagine a situation in which that would happen. Mr. Lisman said he represented the developer. He was concerned about the city meeting the November 1 deadline and he wondered about the perameters of the study. lie suggested that if the study were not done by November 1, the applicant be put on the agenda and allowed to make a presentation based on the information available at the time. Mr. Eoq,�a, felt that was reasonable. Mr. Spitz said the Commission's firstANovember meeting would be the 9th. He thought they could have a work sesoion on the report on the 2nd. Mr. Poger noted that if the report came in earlier, the Commission could discuss it earlier. Mr. Woolery moved to continue the preliminary plat application of V.L. Properties Inc. until November 9 at 7:30 pm at City Hall. Mr. Walsh seconded the motion. 2. PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 23, 1985 Mr. Jacob pointed out that if the plan were denied, the city would end up with 28 units on the land anyway, because of the previous approval. Mr. Dooley moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission deny the final plat of O'Brien ro ers Milot Properties for a 28 unit planned unit development as depicted on plans entitled "Bourdeau-Rye Properties: Revised FinalPlat" prepared by itzpatrick-Llewellyn, Inc., dated March 1985, stamp a ed April18, 175, for the reason that the development exceeds the maximum density wit established by Section 19.152 of the South Burlington 'Zoning rdinance. Mrs. Maher seconded the motion and it carried with Mr. Jacob voting no. Revised final plat, University Mall Realty Trust, to construct 24,000 sq. ft Hilson's building in phase I rather than in Phase II, and abandon existing Hilson building, Dorset Street Mr. George Khouri said the reason for wanting to put the Hilson change into Phase I was to avoid impacting the southern edge of the property more than once. He noted that that is the only area close to residential use, and construction will impact that area. He felt that if the mall could do it once and get it over with, everyone would be happier. He noted that, in order not to change the scope of Phase I, they would abandon the existing Hilson building rather than trying to rent it out between the phases. When Hilson's moves to the new building, the old one will not be re -tenanted. Mr. Khouri said they would be putting in at least pre -cast concrete curbing, not bituminous as they had originally wanted. Mr. Dooley moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat of University Mall Realty Trust for the construction of t 24,000 sq. ft. Hilson's in Phase I in addition to Hanaford Brothers building as depicted on a set of plans entitled "University Mall Proposed Expansion, South Burlington, Vermont" as 2repared by PinkhamEngineering Associates and dated -January, 1985, revised 2 85 with the following stipulations: 1. All prior stipulations are stij.l ii, effect. 2. The plans shall include complAte_:.ility relocation, including City, dater District and private utilities 3. The applicant shall furnish the City detailed as -built plans showing tie points to permanent objects This shall include private utilities including electric, gas and telephone lines. 4. The city, through the city engineer, reserves the right to make field changes regardless of what is shown on the plans if it is in the best interest of the city. 5. This approval expires if not acted upon within 3 years The motion was seconded by Mr. Burgess and carried unanimously. Consider site plan application of Frank Cota for construction of a 2,400 sq ft. building for commercial and residential use at 397 Patchen Road Ms. Bechtel said the Zoning Board had granted a variance allowing for the construction of this building with a residential use upstairs and commercial on the lower floor. Mrs. Maher felt it was appalling that such a variance 3. PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 23, 1985 l had been granted and Mr. Poger said he did not understand how a residential use could be allowed on this property. Ms. Bechtel noted that lot coverage would be 97%. The lot is mostly gravel. Mr. Cota said an existing building would be removed and the new one erected in the same spot. He expected the apartments to be for elderly people, noting that they would be 20' x 30' large. He said the business proposed for the first floor might use one of the apartment areas. Mr.'Poger felt this was not the best place for apartments. The building to be removed is 20' x 28' and the new one will be 30' x 401. Ms. Bechtel noted that the ordinance allowed 70% coverage. She noted that the lot contained 3 openings ( not really curb cuts) and she mentioned closing some of this area and adding landscaping. Mr. Cota said that the school busses occasionally used the middle opening to turn around, and that Ireland's trucks used the most northerly one to turn around. He noted also that Harrington's, across the street, used the most southerly opening to pull his trucks into. He added that when large trucks pulled into Harrington's to unload, they parked partially in the road,. -,and cars going by needed to pull around the trucks. The Commission felt the landscaping would be better used in front of the lot than in the back in front of the proposed new building. Mr. Poger felt the center curb cut should be closed and he said the landscaped area should be curbed. Mr. Dooley moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Frank Cota for construction of a 2400 sq. ft. building on 2 floors for commercial and residential use at 379 Patchen Road as depicted on a plan entitled 'Proposed New Building Frank Cota - owner,_South .Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Gordon G. Woods Associates dated 2/9/85 and 3 18 85 with the following stipulations: 1. The area between the northern and southern entrance drives shall be landscaped for a depth of 15 feet back from the property line. The center driveway shall be closed and landscaped The northern and southern entrance drives shall be no wider than 36 feet. 2. A revise? !sr_dscaping plan showing 31200 in plantings -ro trees along the road between the n•:r'-:hern and southern entrances shall be appr,,--d by th" Planner prior to permit. 3. A bond for $1200 shall be posted prior to permit. 4. The aisles around the buildings shall be kept free of boats, dumpsters, and other obstructions. 5. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion and it carried with Mr, roger abstaining because he felt this was one of the worst plans he had ever seen and he objected to the residential use on the land. Consider request for extension of expired site plan application of Walter Adams, agent, for construction of an 11,910 sq. ft. building for Modern Mailing ServiceL located at 25 Berard Drive Ms. Bechtel said there were no changes to the plans. Mr. Dooley moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission grant a 6 month extension to the site plan approval of Adams Construction Company, Inc., for the construction of an 11,910 sq. ft. building located at 25 Berard CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone 2) APPLICANT ( name, address, phone 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 5) LOT NUMBER ( if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S) Uscq C1� ``1 '� -�1M C►�i���J� Ste' 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES # units, 9) LOT COVERAGE: building a� �; landscaped areas building, parking, outside storage'7i % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $' Landscaping $© Other Site Improvements (please list with cost') $ 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) 1 1 , Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours.: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon'; ; 12-1p.m. _; 1-2 p.m. ; 2-3 p.m. i n 3-4 p.m. A 4-5 p.m.�_; 5-6 p.m.-.,__; 6-7 p.m.1_ 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: �� UM /\A) 14 ) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: P.1 •./�1� Jv�(1� �-1 DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF HEARING SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT PLEASE SUBMIT FIVE COPIES AND ONE REDUCED COPY (11 X 17 ) OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible). Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to or greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' x 18') with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required. Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. (see Table 26-1 of zoning regulations). Location of septic tanks (if applicable). Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Building footprint, building, parking, and outside storage, landscaped areas and front yard, , Location of site (street # and lot #). North arrow Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. L,-9--T vzz�b Z- 2- 31 E DI 9/14/82 MOTION OF APPROVAL For the Site Plan Application by Frank Cota for a 3600 square foot building at 397 Patchen Road as depicted on a plan entitled "New Small Business Building, Frank Cota Owner", prepared by Gordon G. Woods Associates, dated 8/12/82. Stipulations: 1) The five new maples at the rear of the property shall be replaced by equivalent plantings at a more visible location on the property. Revised landscaping shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a building permit_ 2) A $900 landscaping bond shall be provided. 3) This approval expires in 6 months. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 9/10/82 2 ) =ota Property is located on Patchen Road across from the landfill and is currently occupied by a sign shop and other small businesses. The Zoning Board recently granted a multiple -use and front yard setback 17.5' to 67') variance for a 2-story, 30'x60' building. Specific uses have not been determined but could include small manufacturing and office operations. Parking appears sufficient. Traffic and access should not be a problem. The property could well benefit from some landscaping - this should be added to the plan. Also, the top of the bank should be marked on the plan to ensure that all proposed building and park- ing areas are usable. 3) V.L. Properties A review by Prof. Oppenlander and an additional report by Fitzpatrick-Llewllyn on traffic issues are enclosed. I feel that the Planning Commission has two choices: (1) You can review this project on its own. Under this approach, the differences between the applicant's engineer and the City's con- sultant would have to be resolved, and then this applicant could proceed after agreeing to make several limited traffic improvements. (2) The second choice, which both Prof.Oppenlander and I recommend, is that a study be done by the City to evaluate specific improvements for the Dorset Street corridor from Williston Road to Kennedy Drive. The study can becompleted by approximately November 1. I would re- commend an initial work session, to be held on Tuesday, September 21, to discuss "planning parameters" for the study. All affected parties - including V.L. Properties, Corporate Circle, University Mall, and the City - would be invited to participate. (4) College Woods The layout is essentially the same as at sketch plan. The Zoning Board has approved a setback variance to allow construction to within 45 feet from the Interstate fence. The two major questions at this time concern (1) street standards and maintenance and (2) utilities. Date Received By Date Application Completed and Received By CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIE69 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE By \ y r (c) Contact Person �� —c�.c �'1 C. %Jy j ICE- C GX.0 r CL- 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 3) PROPOSED USE(S): r 4) SIZE OF PROJDCT (i.e.,,# of units, floor area, etc.) > 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) 6) COST ESTIMATES: (a) Buildings (b) Landscaping (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) 7) ES`I'IM/V1'ED I'ftO,1F I' COMPLETION DATE �t Z,- 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) 9) PEAK HOUR(S) OF OPERATION S-� ~ -.-y-, 3 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION DATE C oft < < .�� °� `�, ,7Line 20, 196_1 `:,yin State `F�)n 397 PAtchen L ac South Burlirwiton, Vermont 05401 Dear Frank. Lies advised that your .arkin,a ,ireu and landscaping was not installed according to the approved plan. r1tte parking plan ck es not provic;e for a drive-thru area on the norhherly side of the building. The landscaping Man provides for maple and oak trees.a total of six, also two flowering crab trees and six spreading yews. Othen than a few White pines which did not appear -very healthy nothing was planted. Before the landscape bond is released the landscaping mast be planted. As for the different oarkinci arrangement you may wish to submit a revis(NJ plan to the Planning, Co:hni_ia_ion. If. you have any questions don't hesitate to call ;,*2. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoninq Mministrative Officer State of Vermont 1' LAND USE PERMIT CASE No. APPLICANT ADDRESS PB-4-0751 Frank J. Cota 397 Patchen Road So. Burlington, VT 05401 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED ) Protection Division Regulations ) Chapter 4-Public Buildin ) Chapter 9 - Plumbing This project, consisting of construction of a new 2-story pre-engineered metal building for office rental space to be served by municipal -water and sewage, sewage pump station on lot located on Patchen Road in South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the fol- lowing conditions: (1) The project must be completed as shown on the plans prepared by Gordon G. Woods Associates - Dwg. P1 dated August '82, Rev. 10-6, 1-22 and 11-2-82; Dwg. 1SW by Woods Associates and Richard Wheeler, PE, dated August '82, revised 9-20, 10-22-82, which have been stamped "APPROVED" by the Division of Protection. No alterations of these plans shall be allowed except where written application has been made to the Agency of Environmental Conservation and approval obtained. (2) A copy of the approved plans and the Land Use Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. (3) The applicant is reminded that all plumbing material and workmanship, must meet the standards of the Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 9, Plumbing; the Na- tional Plumbing Code; and the requirements of the Vermont Fire Prevention Section of the Department of Labor and Industry. (4) Upon completion of the rough -in for the waste plumbing, and prior to said plumb- ing being covered or closed -in, the Agency of Environmental Conservation is to be contacted so that we may have an opportunity to inspect the workmanship. (5) A professional engineer, registered in the State of Vermont, is to supervise the installation of the pump station, exterior wastewater collection system and water supply system, and upon completion of construction, but prior to the oc- cupancy of the building, the engineer is to make written certification to the Division of Protection, stating all work was completed in accordance with the stamped approved plans. (6) In association with Condition #5 stated above, the engineer's certification is to include, but not be limited to, the dates of inspections, items inspected and the results of infiltration/exfiltration testing of the wetwell and PVC force main. PB-4-0571 LAND USE PERMIT Page 2 (7) The sewage pumping station shall be operated at all times in a manner that will not permit the discharge of effluent onto the surface of the ground or into the waters of the State. Dated at Essex Junction, Vt. this 4th day of November 1982. CC: P. Howard Flanders Gordon G. Woods, Assoc. Richard Wheeler, PE City of So. Burlington Fire Prevention FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION es F. Agan,,6�E, Ass't Regional Eng. Ernest P. Christianson, Regional Admin.