Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-95-0000 - Supplemental - 0003 Patrick StreetSOUTi UALINGTON ZONING BOARD Q ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act r (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property, is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such appellant; unnecessary hardship has not been created by the 0 .1�f Tu " (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential -character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, Will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal 9 Date Appellant 066:5 L L Vote: Yes No = Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings V Tat SOUT) 'URLINGTON ZONING BOARD C, ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property. and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the e provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such phys(ical circumstances or conditions,v there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property: its;- 4;1-�f�� b0 k (3) That such under s ry ardship has not been created by the appellant; '-"— - (4) (5) That�' the ariance, if authorized will not alter" the essential -character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. ;-- �7f� �/ �C.� tc 21� JAppeal 9 Date Appel Vote: Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUT;- 'U14LINGTON ZONING BOARD C ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; bwztl V Z i ^,� 4 ""z' l L � 1 � L(� L!!� 4/ttiGL' � c' 1F7cyJ � J C'r7 ✓LQ / J (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; ✓!u G.. (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. 1 Appeal 4 Date Appellant Note: Yes No = Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTI U14LINGTON ZONING BOARD G ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act i r (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property. and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the n ighbor o0 or disAri.r.V in which e prop t ' s locate; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore nec sary to able the re sonable use of the roty; a Pper ����� �iL�1vO (3) (4) (5) That such unnecess r hardsh-ip has ngt t4een created by the appellantX / e(� f �6D U That the varianle/ if authorized, will not alter the essential -character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modificati ossible of the zbnin Qii regulatis and of the plan. Vote: Yes Appeal 9 Use Reverse side for additional findings 1 SOUTT AJRLINGTON ZONING BOARD C ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; ok�__ (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential -character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal t Date Appellant Vote: Yes No Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings U SOOT) 'URLINGTON ZONING BOARD G, ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance vith Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property. and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; - U (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential -character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date Appellant Vote: Yes Appeal 9 No I I Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings 1- SOUTT VBLINGTON ZONING BOARD G ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property. and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the n� hborhood or district in which the property is located; ` p CV (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility, that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use o the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential -character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent pro rty, nor be detrimental to the Public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulatio %% and� of the plan. i'A .. ..r , 9 s•c.. ' • t.- _ �- =:" •• L4---- a wow — y a, Appeal 9 Date G Appellant Vote: Yes- No Sign LL .4 Use Reverse side for additional findings