HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-95-0000 - Supplemental - 0003 Patrick StreetSOUTi UALINGTON ZONING BOARD Q ADJUSTMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning &
Development Act
r
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot
size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical
conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the
unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the
circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the
provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or
district in which the property, is located;
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the
property;
(3) That such
appellant;
unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
0 .1�f Tu "
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the
essential -character of the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare;
(5)
That the variance, if authorized, Will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of
the plan.
Appeal 9
Date
Appellant 066:5 L L
Vote: Yes No = Sign
Use Reverse side for additional findings
V
Tat
SOUT) 'URLINGTON ZONING BOARD C, ADJUSTMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning &
Development Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot
size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical
conditions peculiar to the particular property. and that the
unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the
circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the e
provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or
district in which the property is located;
(2) That because of such phys(ical circumstances or conditions,v
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the
property: its;- 4;1-�f�� b0 k
(3) That such
under s ry
ardship has not been
created by the
appellant;
'-"— -
(4)
(5)
That�' the ariance, if authorized will not alter" the
essential -character of the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare;
That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of
the plan. ;-- �7f� �/ �C.� tc 21�
JAppeal 9
Date
Appel
Vote:
Use Reverse side for additional findings
SOUT;- 'U14LINGTON ZONING BOARD C ADJUSTMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning
Development Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot
size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical
conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the
unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the
circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the
provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or
district in which the property is located; bwztl
V Z i ^,�
4 ""z' l L � 1 � L(� L!!� 4/ttiGL' � c' 1F7cyJ � J C'r7 ✓LQ
/ J
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the
property;
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant; ✓!u G..
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the
essential character of the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare;
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of
the plan.
1
Appeal 4
Date
Appellant
Note: Yes No = Sign
Use Reverse side for additional findings
SOUTI U14LINGTON ZONING BOARD G ADJUSTMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning &
Development Act
i
r (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot
size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical
conditions peculiar to the particular property. and that the
unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the
circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the
provisions of the zoning regulations in the n ighbor o0 or
disAri.r.V in which e prop t ' s locate;
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore nec sary to able the re sonable use of the
roty; a
Pper ����� �iL�1vO
(3)
(4)
(5)
That such unnecess r hardsh-ip has ngt t4een created by the
appellantX / e(� f �6D U
That the varianle/ if authorized, will not alter the
essential -character of the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modificati ossible of the zbnin Qii regulatis and of
the plan.
Vote:
Yes
Appeal 9
Use Reverse side for additional findings
1
SOUTT AJRLINGTON ZONING BOARD C ADJUSTMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning &
Development Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot
size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical
conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the
unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the
circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the
provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or
district in which the property is located;
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the
property;
ok�__
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant;
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the
essential -character of the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare;
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of
the plan.
Appeal t
Date
Appellant
Vote: Yes No Sign
Use Reverse side for additional findings
U
SOOT) 'URLINGTON ZONING BOARD G, ADJUSTMENT
Findings in accordance vith Section 4468 of the Planning &
Development Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot
size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical
conditions peculiar to the particular property. and that the
unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the
circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the
provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or
district in which the property is located;
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the
property;
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant;
- U
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the
essential -character of the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare;
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of
the plan.
Date
Appellant
Vote: Yes
Appeal 9
No I I Sign
Use Reverse side for additional findings
1-
SOUTT VBLINGTON ZONING BOARD G ADJUSTMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning &
Development Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot
size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical
conditions peculiar to the particular property. and that the
unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the
circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the
provisions of the zoning regulations in the n� hborhood or
district in which the property is located; `
p CV
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions,
there is no possibility, that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use o the
property;
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant;
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the
essential -character of the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
pro rty, nor be detrimental to the Public welfare;
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modification possible of the zoning regulatio %% and� of
the plan. i'A .. ..r , 9 s•c.. ' • t.- _ �- =:"
•• L4---- a wow — y a,
Appeal 9
Date G
Appellant
Vote: Yes- No Sign
LL .4
Use Reverse side for additional findings