Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
VR-86-0000 - Supplemental - 0400 Patchen Road (3)
5UUTH BUHLiNGTON GON114'6 I Buhl) U: ADJUL;i;r_.;4i Findings In accordance with Section 14-46e of the Planning & Developinant Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the partticular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical* circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; n (t+) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property Is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and [ (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date Appellant r Vote: Yes No Sign G� L1..,- r+-al---- L--, - -.- 1. 2. SOUTH 13UN.LiNGTON WINING bUio.1) U�' ADJ ULi1'M:,i4T r'Indings in accordance with Section 1446f of the Planninf; & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unn©cessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in,.the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; V-7 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 1:1 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has notbeencreated by the appellant; n (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and U (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. a Date A- Appella7n Vote: Yes ATo List findinos bel 1 2. 3. Appeal # SOUTH HUH LINGTON ZONING ► OA,:U U"' AUJ UL 1 ,:-,�4 t' Findings In accordance with Section 1+460 of the Planning; & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; j- (2) That because of such physical 'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential.' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property Is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (s) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date_ � ( Z-vlg4 Appellant W P"" ,L/ Vote: Yes No List findings below: Appeal # sign - PO 0 SOUTH HUHLINGTON GUNING tsUi„tu U�' Findings In accordance with Section 1+1+6P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is they fore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has notbeencreated by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacen 'property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. [BI Date i Appellant Vote: Yes N0 Q List findings below: 3: Appeal #• Sig ;iOU'rif HUHL1NGTON ZONING HUA,tl) U`' Findings In accordance with Section 1+46P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions Peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in t neighborhood or district in which the property is located; �J (2) That because of such physical 'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; ( l�f0 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not —been (created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential.' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent pr�oPerty, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan �\�c Appeal # 28 Date Appellant ')PO70 Vote : Yes W410I n'o List findings below: Slg C a J O)J 1- 4 - -