The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZB-89-0000 - Supplemental - 0160 Patchen Road (2):;ul l'Il 141�f�I,1Nt;1't,`: ;,tt`1INt; ItuAlrl� rrl 11�.I1::;'Inil Nl I r nd i n}: t rr nr orclIn,'r w t Llr tic c t t urt I •I ti TS t t hr I' I nnrr t ri{' 11r•�'r• I ol,nirnt ,1c• 1 ( 1 ) 1 hn t. thcr rct it r'cr urr t clue ph i c+i I c t rcumt; tarrcr c,r c and i t. i orrr; , including ir•regulnrit.v, nnrrowness, or shnIIowne:ti of Iot. size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculirir to the particular property, and thrit the unncc( .1r;sa ry In rdsh i 1) i s due to such coed i t, i ons , and not the t:irc:umstancc-ts or conditions gc:ner-a11v created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2). That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; do--- (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulation ,Ls,, and of t. h e plan. ---_1_7/J �' Igo liX,�T 0..riC4-/�--�W &"e Appeal w 4- 1)at.c 1 -� 4/8I-- — -- - - - nppc-I Lant t4,bpgr V—'e.4y C / Vote: Yes 1 I No Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings tic rl 'I'11 It111, I. I Nr%•i'(). il1N IN(; Ile )Altll ')I, l l,l t'';' Nl— NIT F t lilt i figs I it fie a eer'dt►ne e• w t t.h tic c t teen 1 •I I;K eet the I' I firm t Ilg I)v%,(! l erl)me•nt Ac t Tht► t. the re a r•e un i (lilt! phys i err 1 c i I•cumti Lances c►►- cored i t. i ons ificludifig ir►•egultrrit.y, narrowness, or shal lowness e,I' lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhica1 or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that. the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not. the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in Which the property is located; V - (2).- That because 'of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning • regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; _ V (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of' adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; V — — — -- (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulnt-ions and of the p 1 __ -- -- — - — - V� Appeal Date Appe 1 I a n t _ _ Vote: Yes No I I grt ,0 Use Reverse side for additional findings C � tie rl 1*11 [it If,' I, I N(, I k ' :tIN I Nt; I+t I,llrlt t rl \I .II!')*T` FNT F Ind i fig.,; I n Itcl-(Irdlifice• I th Soc t I O[1 •1.11 eel the I'I ntiti l ri> A Deve l uptue•nt A t ( I1 That. there, (Ire III) icfur.- physical (-,Ircumst.ances or condit. Ions inc:ludifig iI-rery_;ularit.y, narrowness, or steal lowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topogi-lihical or other physical conditions peculiar to Lhe particular property, r►nd that, the unnecessary hardship is due Lo such conditions, rind not. the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located;wYYowKt�__1'T' (2) That because of' such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of* a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; s-c<s,,r�� 4 ✓ J — (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; ,��T riZ.< <yif.�l .6i (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanentl} impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief' and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of' t. h e plan. — --: r_�� N ��• �n_cs_✓ _ %�—_ _ Appeal It t. e - - �e/vr� - ( l `f A p p e l l ant Vote : Yes No 1 S I gn Use ReverseReverse side for additional t•indinK_ ,;( )• I II It1J1, 1. 1 Nt:"I W, /A)N 1 Nt; IWA1(I1 c )I- I Ild i rigs 1 ri It r (Irdt►(tt'r w 1 t.lt tirr t t crri I'll/>< rrt t.hr I' I iiiin i tiI, IJc•�r lopmcrnt A 1 ( 1 1 That. the! rc1 I►r'a un i que phys i ca I c i rcunts t.ancrts or cond 1 t• 1 anti , iricludIlig i rreg►rlitri t.y, narrowness, or shc►I lowness of ►ot size or shape, or exceptional Lopogrrthical or other physical conditions peculiar Lo the particular property, t►nd that. the unnecessary hr►rdship is due Lo such conditions, and not. the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neialiborhood r district in whic the property is located; � � --I C zk- (2);-That bec se of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary,able the r sonable use of the property; �.A/ /.f��ist (3) That such unnecessa appellant; F--0 L orefiTed by the �� : - // (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be�detrimj _�to the pi�lj wwfare;--7*-- (5) That the variance, if auth6fized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford 'relief and will represent the least modit'icaAAon. possible of ning t.ion rid of the plan. A p 1)11 tc r ► // /✓ Q - Vot(.: Yes _ No I Sign Use Reverse side f•or addi tioncil t'indings