Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-86-0000 - Supplemental - 0065 Patchen Road (2)SOU"I'fl 13UE?LING1'ON ZONING BOPutD OF ADJUSTM: ,,NT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; El (2) That because of such*physical*circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 11 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has notbeencreated by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 1:1 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # 6 Date CC,7/— 2Q ,Appellant ��✓� �i1/oo� Vote: Yes Q No Sign List findings below: a T/ ��/ �/ -' 7 C. D t1 (!A �/ �. lY�i/'e�� %� f7`�YG f CI it 7`mrrr►i �+. w� �L 2. r-�ee- - X-,72r;e-_e,,000' wa u�'/ �- lam- �.w►7s-f/� o� 4e,�,�o�o� 3• - SOIJTH BUN.LINGTON %ONING I30A-i..D O!' ADJU,i'l""`,NT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning; & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such*physical'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 11 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has notbeencreated by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date 16 /26 & .Appellant Jk2 ( � Vote: Yes ❑ No 0i List findings below: Appeal # f S1 g n 4.rz, - 44-i No i �' ► z� 1-1,.t2.� '� ff'�� � � t x�.�eS� fi N J 4 � a, Y�uie� � � � ��� n-c•. �. ��-H s � � �,� a t� �'` �� 3. SOUTH BURLINGTON CONING I30lli?D 01" ADJU:.;'1'M.JNT Findings in accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such•physical'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 11 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has notbeencreated by the appellant; H (1+) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently Impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and EJ (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date C-�� Appellant i�� Ci-,.-�� �✓ art ��, Vote: Yes Q No List findings below: 1. Appeal �0 ri Sign C c� ki SOUTH BUR LINGTON ZONING I30ti' U O�' ADJ OS)T " .NT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such cohditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations In the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such -physical 'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 1J (3) That such unnecessary hardship has notbeencreated by the appellant; D (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. a Date I OLL0 Appellant Vote: Yes Q List findings below: 1. 2. 3• No Appeal # r Sign SOUTH 13UN, LING1'ON ZONING I30tw l) Off' ADJ US'I Mu ,-N'I' Findings in accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Developmont Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such cohditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations In the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 1 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and Q. (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date DST Ly fZ Appellant /Y%• ZA/oo<4— Vote: Yes Q No � n_;, List findings below: 3• SOU'I'}1 I3U}? LING'1'ON %ON ING r30A). 0�' AU.J U;;'1'u`. N'l' Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Developmont Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such* physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; Ii (3) That such unnecessary hardship has notbeencreated by the appellant; 0 (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # x/ Da t e 76 ,Appellant Vote: Yes Q 2. 3.