The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0031 0033 Patchen RoadCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 24, 2007 Pat Clark 1524 Charlotte Road Hinesburg, VT 05461 Re: 31-33 Patchen Road Dear Ms. Clark: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Administrative Officer on September 21, 2007 (effective 09/21/07). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months. Should you have any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, 4x7*K4 Betsy Donough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 0 ''11 a Permit Number SP- U 7 - 4 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on mailing address, phone and fax # 71- 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #)_ 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) r c, 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 3 1 — 33 ?A -f - c � ell, kcA- - i 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property .(including description and size of each separate use) �� C-e b) Proposed Uses on property (include main)_ Io _P_. A'( /-Q I n P - le c) Total building square footmq on I ize of each new use and existing uses to (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) e) Number of residential units new units and existing units to remain) V4 os-y�I, 1 f) Number of employees & company vehicles existing and propose�g,�F office versus non -office employees): ` ,� — „� " /Ub d Th� h'1 G'd P .f.Y�c, g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: Sq. Ft. / a) Building: Existing % / _ sq. ft.� Proposed % / sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed_ _% / sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ 4 b) Landscaping: $ 0 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 2 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMAT'ED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) J< i red eo r-�9� 30 �511V'ete� `� �-�f j4°4 f�l e� SITE PLAN A A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 3 91 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SI NATURE O APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: / REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Id Comp 7 4 EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. o Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) o Survey data (distance and acreage) o Contours (existing and finished) o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations o Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping o Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways o Zoning boundaries o Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) o Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) o Location of septic tanks (if applicable) o Location of any easements o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard o North arrow o Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be down casting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) o Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations o If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE ❑ Site Plan $ ".5* 18(0 ❑ Amended Site Plan $ 1166 ❑ Administrative Site Plan $-8-5* S6 * Includes $�9.66 recording fee 11.00 5 #55 WHITE STREET BUILDING COVERED = 12.81 OVERALL = 67.8% WHITE STREET FRONT 30' = 3,01 990 SQ.FT. COVERED 331 LEGEND UTILITY POLE OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE —•••— CATCH BASIN 0 SEWER MANHOLE LIGHT POLE # PARKING SPACE P RAIL FENCE — o — NGS DISK C95033 GRAPHIC SCALE m 20 n #31-33 PATCHEN ROAD BUILDING COVERED - 17.2% i OVERALL = 57.0% PATCHEN ROAD FRONT 50' AREA = 7292 SQ.FT. COVERED = 3,000 SQ.FT. - 41.1% WHITE STREET FRONT 30' - 2,036 SQ.FT. 10 0% COVERED 0 NOTE: THIS SITE PLAN IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A BOUNDARY SURVEY. LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS A BOUNDARY SURVEY MAY DISCLOSE. SITE PLAN MARLEE-BONE, LLC 31-33 PATCHEN & 55 WHITE STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT BY VERMONT LAND SURVEYORS, INC SEPT. 24, 2007 JOB NO.2718 1 7GEN D UTILITY POLE OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE CATCH BASIN SEWER MANHOLE LIGHT POLE PARKING SPACE RAIL FENCE #55 WHITE STREET BUILDING COVERED - 12.8; OVERALL - 73% WHITE STREET FRONT 30' = 3,0 990 SO.FT. COVERED - 33, NGS DISK C95033 GGPAPHIC SCAIJ1 1 Inch - k0 IL V =Y1 z O 3" b #31-33 PATCHEN ROAD BUILDING COVERED - 17.2% OVERALL - 57.0% PATCHEN ROAD FRONT 50' AREA - 7292 SQ.FT. COVERED - 3,000 SO -FT. - 41.17. WHITE STREET FRONT 30' = 2,036 SQ.FT. 07 COVERED NOTE: THIS SITE PLAN IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A BOUNDARY SURVEY. LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS A BOUNDARY SURVEY MAY DISCLOSE. SITE PLAN �rp� MARLEE-BONE, LLC 31-33 PATCHEN & 55 WHITE STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT BY VERMONT LAND SURVEYORS, INC NOV. 20, 2007 JOB NO.2718 c x) � ► ' ; 'J State of Vermont Departmen- of Fish and Wildlife Departme ^, Forests, Parks and Recreation Jepartme— of Environmental Conservation February 22, 2001 Gerald W. Desautels, Esquire Desautels & Micciche, Inc. 315 St. Paul Street Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Jerry: 1 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Telephone #(802) 879-5656 Subject: Pre - 1970 Duplex to Office Space, 1 - 33 Patchen Road, outh Burlington, Vermont. This letter is in response to your letters to me dated December 15, 2000 and February 5, 2001 regarding the above subject property. It is my understanding that the duplex building was constructed prior to June 1, 1970, the duplex contained a total of six bedrooms, the use of the building will be for a total of six employees and there has been no changes to the exterior footprint of the building nor changes to the existing municipal water and/or sewer services. Based on the above understanding, this letter shall serve as approval by the Waste Water Management Division for the change in use of the structure from a six bedroom duplex to office space with a maximum of six employees with the following condition: 1. By acceptance of this letter, the landowner agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property subject to this permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental/health statutes and regulations. 2. No alterations to the building that would change or affect the exterior water supply or sewage disposal, or the approved use of the building shall be allowed without prior review and approval from the Wastewater Management Division. E Gerald W. Desautels, Esquire February 21, 2001 Page 2 Please note, the conversion of the building described above is authorized by this letter. Any alterations, modifications and/or additions to this building or for similar type projects may, in the future, require a Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit from the Wastewater Management Division. Additionally, this letter does not relieve the landowner form obtaining all other permits or approvals as may be required from other Departments within the State of Vermont and the city of South Burlington. Please contact me at 1-802-879-5675 if you have any questions. Sincerely, - Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer copies: City of South Burlington 2 GRAVEL AND SHEA Attorneys at Law 76 St. Paul Street Post Office Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0369 Telephone 802.658.0220 F¢ceirnile 802.658.1456 www. gravelshea.com Writer's E-Mail: mishford@grayshea. com Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 January 16, 2001 Stephen R. Crampton Stewart H. McConaughy Robert B. Hemley William G. Post, Jr. Craig Weatherly James E. Knapp John R. Ponsetto Dennis R. Pearson Peter S. Erly Robert F. O'Neill Margaret L. Montgomery Stephen P. Magowan Heather Briggs Robert H. Rushford Re: LeBlanc to Homebuilders and Remodelers Ass'n of Northern Vermont, Inc. - 31-33 Patchen Road, South Burlin tg_on Dear Ray: Clarke A. Gravel Charles T. Shea Of Coun.,el Norman Williams Special Cou el Johan W.E. Maitland Michelle N. Farkas Rebecca C. Raskin Andrew D. Manitsky Enclosed for your file, please find the original signed Affidavit from Mr. LeBlanc to address the issues we discussed (i.e., concerning the paving of the parking lot and the lack of a building permit or certificate of occupancy for the conversion that was approved in 1984 by the Planning Commission). Please be in touch with any questions. Very truly yours, GRAVEL AND SHEA Robert H. Rushford RHR:ejh Enclosure cc: Kevin Dorn, Executive Director (w/enclosure) Mr. Greg Dirmaier (w/enclosure) Gerald W. Desautels, Esq. (w/o enclosure) AFFIDAVIT The undersigned, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I have been one of the existing owners of the lands and premises located at 31-33 Patchen Road in South Burlington (the "Patchen Road Property"), and the adjacent lands and premises located at 55 White Street in South Burlington (the "White Street Property") since 1988. 2. For several years before 1988 (from 1971 to 1988), my office was located at 1340 Williston Road, in close proximity to the Patchen Road Property and the White Street Property. During this period, I personally observed the operations of both the Patchen Road Property and the White Street Property and became acquainted with Ronald Muir (the prior owner of both properties), since I had a long-term interest in acquiring both properties. 3. Based on my personal observations and ownership of the Patchen Road Property and the White Street Property, I hereby certify the following: (a) The parking lot behind the Patchen Road Property and the parking lot behind the White Street Property were paved as a contiguous parking lot more than 15 years ago and were used as a common parking facility serving both properties. Although a fresh course of paving was re -applied approximately 10 years ago, no new areas were paved. Therefore, the current limits of the pavement and the current use of the parking lot have been in existence for more than 15 years. (b) The Patchen Road Property was converted for use and actually used as a business office more than 15 yeas ago. (c) For the past 15 years, there have been no changes to the uses and/or structure on the Patchen Road Property, except as otherwise described in the approved building/zoning permits for the Patchen Road Property. Dated at South Burlington, Vermont this fi day of January, 2001. c Ray nd . L lanc STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At g U KL I t-►�,Tv r J , in said County and State, this / / day of January, 2001, personally appeared RAYMOND B. LeBLANC, to me known, and he swore to the truth of the foregoing statements. Before me !A, Notary Public <HBA LeBlanc ABidavil(Restoredy125612/2_X8011.WPD/RHR> IJ GRAVEL AND SHEA Attorneys at Law 76 St. Paul Street Post Office Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0369 Telephone 802.658.0220 Facsimile 802.658.1456 www. gravelshea.com Writer's E-Mail: rrushford@grayshea.com Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 January 8, 2001 Stephen R. Crampton Stewart H. McConaughy Robert B. Hemley William G. Post, Jr. Craig Weatherly James E. Knapp John R. Ponsetto Dennis R. Pearson Peter S. Erly Robert F. O'Neill Margaret L. Montgomery Stephen P. Magowan Heather Briggs Robert H. Rush Ford Re: LeBlanc to Homebuilders and Remodelers Ass'n of Northern Vermont, Inc. - 31-33 Patchen Road, South Burlington Dear Ray: Clarke A. Gravel Charles T. Shea Of Counsel Norman Williams Special Counsel Johan W. E. Maitland Michelle N. Farkas Rebecca C. Raskin Andrew D. Manitsky Thank you for meeting with us last week regarding the above -referenced property. Enclosed please find a proposed Affidavit from Mr. LeBlanc to address the issues we discussed (i.e., concerning the paving of the parking lot and the lack of a building permit or certificate of occupancy for the conversion that was approved in 1984 by the Planning Commission). Please let me know if the Affidavit adequately addresses these issues and we will forward the original for your file. Very truly yours, GRAVEL AND SHEA Robert H. Rushford RHR:ejh Enclosure cc: Kevin Dorn, Executive Director (w/enclosure) Mr. Greg Dirmaier (w/enclosure) Gerald W. Desautels, Esq. (w/enclosure) AFFIDAVIT The undersigned, being duly sworn, deposes and says: l . I have been one of the existing owners of the lands and premises located at 31-33 Patchen Road in South Burlington (the "Patchen Road Property"), and the adjacent lands and premises located at 55 White Street in South Burlington (the "White Street Property") since 1988. 2. For several years before 1988 (from 1971 to 1988), my office was located at 1340 Williston Road, in close proximity to the Patchen Road Property and the White Street Property. During this period, I personally observed the operations of both the Patchen Road Property and the White Street Property and became acquainted with Ronald Muir (the prior owner of both properties), since I had along -term interest in acquiring both properties. 3. Based on my personal observations and ownership of the Patchen Road Property and the White Street Property, I hereby certify the following: (a) The parking lot behind the Patchen Road Property and the parking lot behind the White Street Property were paved as a contiguous parking, lot more than 15 years ago and were used as a common parking facility serving both properties. Although a fresh course of paving was re -applied approximately 10 years ago, no new areas were paved. Therefore, the current limits of the pavement and the current use of the parking lot have been in existence for more than 15 years. (b) The Patchen Road Property was converted for use and actually used as a business office more than 15 yeas ago. (c) For the past 15 years, there have been no changes to the uses and/or structure on the Patchen Road Property, except as otherwise described in the approved building/zoning permits for the Patchen Road Property. Dated at South Burlington, Vermont this day of January, 2001. Raymond B. LeBlanc STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At , in said County and State, this day of January, 2001, personally appeared RAYMOND B. LeBLANC, to me known, and he swore to the truth of the foregoing statements. Before <HBA LeBlanc Affidavit (Restored)1125612/2_X8011.WPD/RHR> Notary Public 00!- Date Received 'el, , r ' ^4 By Date Application Completed and Received By By CITY OF SOUTH BURLING'ION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVI&I 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: (a) Owner of Record Frank and Maria Carueei.o (b) Applicant Ronald Muir (c) Contact Person Ronald Ruir 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 31 -33 Patchen Road 3) PROPOSED USE(S) : Professional offices 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e., # of units, floor area, etc.) 2,016 sq ft floor area; 10 rooms and 2 bathrooms; 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) 4-8 6) COST ESTIMATES: (a) Buildings 3 , 400-- lighting, painting, carpeting (b) Landscaping 2,470-- removal of dangerous, overhanging trees; flower - in. trees, shrubs, topsoil,, gravel par ing a (c) Afl Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work 1 , �18 -- eliminate one _ curb cut (closest to intersection); Site Plan preparation; Sign 7) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE June 15, 1984 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) 15-20 in and 1 5-20 out 9) PEAK HOUR(S) OF OPERATION 10-12; 3-5; Sat A.M. 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Mon; Fri; Sat D SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT �I PI %INNING COMMISSIO^I T^�>> �, 1 _�34 The South Burlington Planning Coranission held a Regular Meetin;; on Tuesday, May 8, 1984, at 7:30 pni, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street, Merribers Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; George Mona, Judy Hurd, John Belter, Mary -Barbara Maher, William Burgess Member Absent Peter Jacob Others Present Jane Bechtel, City Planner; Richard Ward, Zoning Administrator; Ronald Muir, James Lamphere, Lance Llewellyn, Carl Lisman, As the meeting opened, Mr. Poger and members of the Commission welcomed the new City Planner, Jane Bechtel. Minutes of May 1, 1984 Mr. Burgess moved that the Minutes of May 1, 1984 be approved as printed. Mr. Belter seconded with 5-0 approval, Mr. Poger abstaining. Continue site plan application of Ronald Muir tabled 5[1184, conversion of a duplex unit into an -owe complex at 31-33 Mr. Muir explained that the property is across from Flair, on the corner Patchen Rd. and White St. The proposal is to buy the building and change it from a two -apartment house to an office building with Mr. Muir using one office for his real estate business and renting one or more other offices, depending on the size of the renter. There will be 2,116 sq. ft. of rentable space, with 9 parking spaces in the back. They will eliminate the scruffy trees on the left side. Mr Muir spoke with the neighbor and they have agreed to a two -rail fence between the properties. There will be green areas between the houee and White Street and all along the front. Present fences will be removed. The problem that arose last week was that Mr. Bolton was concerned about water draining onto his land. Mr. Muir met with him and with the City Engineer and a drop inlet was suggested running to a catch basin draining into a 61, pipe. They will also pitch the parking lot about 6 inches toward the inlet. Mr. Muir said it was his under- standing that the property line which was was questioned last time is correctly drawn. Mrs. Maher then moved that the South Burlington Planning Com- mission grant approval-7777777n DreDared by Mark Ward, dated Apra 1984. for property at _1-35 Patchen Road for the PL/'1VNIIVU �:OMNII�:-1.�1`J May 8, 1984 page 2 purpose of converting the duplex to an office complex, wits the following stipulations: 1. The driveway presently to the right of the ftont door will be eliminated. 2. Landscaping to the right and front of the building will be provided. 3. A bond in an amount to be stipulated by Mr. Ward will be secured. 4. Fencing and any other proposals made by Mr. Muir to the Planning Commission will be adhered to. 5. The drainage as proposed by the City Engineer will be under- taken and completed. 6. This permit expires 6 months from date of approval. The motion was seconded by Mr. Burgess and was approved unanimously. PreliminarV plat application of Harold Bensen for construction of 16 residential units in conjunction with two offices, a 65 Patc en Road Mr. Lamphere explained that there will be 3 buildings. The first and third will be two-story, slab on grade; the center building, also two stories, will have a basement. New water and sewer lines will be put in. There will be an 8" water line instead of the originally proposed 6" line, in compliance with the City Engineer's request. Mr. Szymanski was also concerned about storm water, and contours are being done. If a manhole is required, there will be no problem. Mr. Poger noted this project will be second on the sewer waiting list. The question of sidewalks was discussed, and it was noted that the Commission favored the idea of the development because it would allow the residents access to the Post Offices and other facilities on Williston Road. Mr. Poger said he felt that there should either be a sidewalk to Patchen Road or a walkway from the interior to the edge of one of the parking lots in front. It was also noted that the Fire Chief had requested two hydrants, and Ms. 'Bechtel was asked to discuss this with the Chief. Mrs. Maher then moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the preliminary plat application of Harold Bensen for construction of sixteen 1 residential units in con unction with two office complexes, as depicted on a p an en it ed "Proposed development or Hal Bensen " dated Januar and revised April 9 re are Wiemann-Lama ere Architects, subject o the following stipulations: I. That the sewer allocation be 4,000 gpd, in accordance with the sewer policy adopted by the Planning Commission. FINDINGS OF FACT STATE OF VERMIONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BUR LINGTON Re: Findings of Fact, application of Ronald Muir, 31-33 On the Rth of may 19 84 , the South Burlington Panning Commission approved or 4@MZ4 the request of Ronald Muir, 31-33 Patchen Road for under Section 19.10 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations based on the following findings: 1. TRAFFIC ACCESS - pr =pQ--,-cJ t-n maintain one curb cut and eliminate -rntYanr (Jrjve i�,- pr LnQsed at reQuired 20' width with two-way traffic. 2. CIRCULATION AND PARKING - Parking as proposed is adequate for proposed use with nine spaces and a gravelled lot. No parking is proposed for the front of the building. 3. LANDSCAPING $ SCREENING - Proposed landscaping is adequate with landscaping added to the front of the building, a lot of trees along the southerly line removed to provide access and trees removed in the rear to provide parking. A rail fence is proposed between the Muir and Sanderson rty. cu i ( South Burlington Planning Commission ,/ 7/84 MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission grant site plan approval for the application of Ronald Muir for conversion of an existing duplex into an office complex containing 2016 square feet at 31-33 Patchen Road, as depicted on a plan entitled "Plat Plan for Ronald Muir", dated April 17, 1984 prepared by Palmer Company, Ltd., with the following stipulations: 1) That a landscaping bond in the amount of $500.00 and a bond for curb work in the amount of $700 be posted prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 2) That the sewer allocation be reduced to 250 g.p.d. in accordance with the sewer policy developed by the Planning Commission. 3) This approval shall expire in 6 months. ND . M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 5/4/84 2) Muir, 31-33 Patchen Road The applicant, adjoining property owner and the City Engineer have worked out the drainage concerns. See Mr. Szymanski's memo. 3) H. Bensen, 65 Patchen Road Access from Patchen Road is proposed, involves extension of the present driveway. Drive will be private, 20 feet in width. Street is presently called Executive Drive. Street should have a base similar to City specifications. The sewer capacity, projected is 4000 g.p.d. this project will be second on the waiting list, in accordance with the Planning Commission sewer policy. The recreational fee ($200.00 per unit) is payable prior to the issuance of a building permit. Landscaping: plan should be submitted at final plat review, the site has a growth of poplar trees. The Commission may wish to allow a credit, however, those trees have no real value. A planting schedule of $350 per unit on a average would be considered acceptable. Setbacks, along with parking meets the requirements. 4) V.L. Properties, Dorset Square Shopping Center Proposed is a new design of the buildings, the foot print will change which will result in a reduction of the square footage. Approved was 47,044 square feet, the new design is 46,868 square feet. Parking design and circulation changes, however, the parking spaces remain the same (220 spaces). An area of 12 compact cars is proposed. The green area will be increased to 29.4%. Commission approved 29% originally. Access drive to the side and rear of the complex is reduced from 24 to 22 feet. Entrance to complex remain the same, however, southerly ehtrance to University Mall will be relocated. A revised landscape plan must be submitted for approval by the Planner or the Commission. 5) R.D.R. Enterprises Parcel contains 23.7 acres - division into three lots (a) 4.8 (b) 7.0 (c) 11.9 acres. Access to Dr. Brown's property was discussed at sketch plan review. Joint access along easterly property line of the Scottish Rite Temple lot is proposed. Sewer capacity of two remaining lots will be determined as uses are proposed. Not able to consider the gallonage, therefore impossible to include those lots on waiting lost. Suggest a maximum of 1000 g.p.d. for the two lots in question. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 5/4/84 Ron Muir, Office Building, Patchen Road On May 3, 1984 I visited the site with Mr. Muir and Mr. Bolton. It was agreed that a drop inlet be installed in the north-west corner of Mr. Muir's lot approximately 13 feet south of the White Street property line and 4 feet east of the westerly property line. The inlet to be piped with a 6 inch pipe to the Patchen Road corner inlet. The rim elevation shall be approximately 99.5' and the new parking area to be sloped toward this inlet via a swale skewed south-westerly across parking lot. 3) Hal Bensen, Residential Development, Patchen Road I. Method of handling storm water along the rear of the buildings shall be shown on final plans. 2. Consideration should be given for a walkway to bank and post office. 3. I question the adequacy of a 6 inch water line for both fire protection and domestic use. If it is to be public the minimum size is 8 inches. The same applies to the sewer line. 4) V.L. Properties, Storm Sewer Relocation 1. I have worked closely with Mr. Llewellyn on this relocation and my only comment is that the pipe be plastic or concrete preferably plastic. 6) Scottish Rite Temple 1. Property to the east and possibly some to the north drains toward this parcel. This should be anticipated and provided for by a swale or a drainage pipe. 2. North parking lot should have a walkway across wooded area to building. 3. A turnaround should be provided for service drive near building. 4. Building elevations not shown but I would recommend first floor elevation of approximately elevation 335. 5. The north parking lot width may be cut down (10' - 15') by utilizing the one entrance and exit lane and turnaround. 6. The anticipated sewage flow from this facility is about 400 gallons per day. The Muir proposal for converting a residential duplex at White-Patchen Road to office use will substantually decrease the sewage flow from that property (700 plus or minus g.p.d. to 200 plus or minus g.p.d.). I would reconunend that this building be substituted for that difference. yy / 1 3. PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 1, 1984 Site plan application of Ronald Muir for conversion of a duplex unit into an office complex at 31-33 Patdhen-Road Mr. Ward noted that the parking lot in the rear would be gravel. The City Manager/Engineer feels that the entrance drive should be narrowed to allow for snow storage, but the ordinance requires 20' width. The entrance will be from Patchen Road. Mr. Muir said there were two curb cuts on the lot now and that the one closest to the Patchen Road/White St. intersection would be eliminated. There will be no parking in front of the building, and a lot of the trees on the site will be taken down. There will be a real estate office in the building, which will be for professional offices. Landscaping will be added in front of the building. Mr. Muir said his office would use about 1/4 of the building, and he hoped to find3 or 4 other 1-2 person office uses, or one large 5-6 person use for the rest of the building. Mr. Muir said his neighbor Mr. Bolton did not want any more water draining onto his property, so the land will be built up 2-3" so excess water will flow away from that area. He added that his other neighbor, Mr. Sanderson, did not want traffic on his land, so he suggested a simple rail fence between the two lots. Mr. Ward noted that the 20' entrance drive would run from the edge of the house to the property line. Mr. Muir said snow could be stored on the lot. Mrs. Maher felt the drainage and snow storage issues could be worked out by the applicant and the City Manager/Engineer, but she felt the drive had to be two-way. Mr. Jacob noted that snow might have to be removed. Mr. Bolton said he was happy to have the site improved, but he did not want any more runoff onto his land. He said also that he was not sure the property line was actually where it was shown. It was felt that that was something to take up with Mr. Muir's surveyor. Mr. Mona felt Messrs. Bolton and Muir should speak with the City Manager/ Engineer on some of the issues that had come up tonight and resolve them for the next meeting. Mrs. Maher moved to continue the hearing on the site plan application of Ronald Muir until the next meeting, May 8, 1984 at 7:30 pm at City Hall. Mr. Belter seconded the motion and all voted for it. Continue preliminary plat application of University Mall Realty Trust, tabled_ as of March 27, 1984, University Mall, 155 Dorset St. Mr. Jacob said he had resolved his situation concerning the Mall and that he would remove himself from the discussion or not, as the Commission felt was best. Several members felt he should stay, but others felt it would set a bad precedent. Mr. Jacob removed himself from the discussion. Mr. Ward said the major issues were the number of parking spaces and the percentage of compact spaces. He said the Zoning Board had granted conditional use approval to allow the Cl zone to extend into the CO district by 50'. The Hannaford building will be 150' from the Interstate, and 50' will be used for parking and circulation. Mr. Ward said the Zoning Board had stipulated that a 20' buffer strip between the mall and the Interstate be maintained, so one row of parking will have to come out there behind the existing building. Mr. Spitz noted that in most places the buffer would be considerably more than 20' wide. This area will be landscaped. Mr. 'lard said the parking satisfied the city's planning consultant, Mr. Spitz. It is just under 5.25 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable area, and the compact car ratio is 11.6% of the total number of spaces. Mrs. Maher asked when the existing Martin's building would be removed and MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Ron Muir Office Complex Date: 5/l/84 1. The adjacent neighbor expressed his concerns regarding the lot drainage especially if it is paved. I would recommend that a drop inlet be installed north-west of building and new property line and lot graded toward this in- let. This inlet could outlet in the Patchen Road drainage. 2. There should be more clearance between the entance drive and the residence to the south to allow for screening and snow storage. The drive may be de- creased to a one way drive. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 4/27.84 2) Calkins, lot #1, Calkins Court No real major concerns, this existing foundation will be removed. A joint access from lot #2 is proposed for truck traffic. Landscaping as proposed is in conformance. Some new curb work necessary. Sewer allocation for this use being 250 g.p.d. Performance bond required for land- scaping and curb work. 3) Lums addition, 1705 Williston Road Zoning Board of Adjustment granted a variance to the front yard landscaped area requirements. Proposed is a green area of 41 per cent, addition buffer area with increase landscaping. Additional 17 spaces along westerly property line are proposed. Addition to the rear plus repair of fire damage is proposed An increase of 50 seats is proposed. Parcel is located within Zone 5 of the Traffic Overlay District, increase does not pose a problem, additional lot area will be used. Present sewer usage is 2,250 g.p.d. and increase of 600 g.p.d. is projected. Landscaping bond is required. 4) Muir 7- 31/33 Patchen Road Proposed is the conversion of an existing duplex unit into an office complex. The rear yard will be graveled to provide parking.. The tree line along the southerly line must be removed to provide access. The northerly curb opening will be closed. The best access being the southerly opening, this is a corner lot, located at a heavy traveled intersection. Approximately 450 g.p.d. of sewer will be added to the present capacity, the proposed use requiring 250 g.p.d. No major concerns. Bonding for landscaping and curb closing is required. 5) University Mall See enclosed memo's from Dave Spitz and myself. -ro : J) I �A �Jaa q.lxlc-1 50 saldu�� d� - -zeluad h?6441�a2t4, MR, /�ONAL U Al(J/K- � Ba/s- tsSioN V -tv- (1 � 33 /Ezzce `J .cu &� , dFujuu PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Plan- ning Commission will hold a pub- lic hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, May B, 1984, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the followings . 11 Prohminary Plot application of a Hrold B. Benson for a planned tOmmerc" development consist- ing of sixteen (16) residential and two commercial office C.- Alex (prosendy existing) on a lot containing aPProximately 3.7 acres. Proposed development is boated at 65 Patchen Road, bounded by properties of Hal - Matto Inc., Merchant Properties, Inc., Parsons 3 Sons Lumber Company, Dr. John Hessie, My- ers and the City of South Burling- ton. 2) Revised fmol plat application by V.L. Properties, Inc., for a 4.9 lam acro Ped commorciol devel- opment at 150 Dorset erty Street. Propis bounded on the r" by Earl's Schwinn, on the east cod south by Lake Buick and on the west by Ruth Wood and Dorset Street. 31 Preliminary plat application of R.D.R. Enterprises for a three (3) lot subdivision of a parcel can - Wining approximately twenty- three (23) ocres, located on Kim- ball Drive. Property is bounded on the north by Brown, Munson, Greenfield and Assembly of God, on the east by Baker, Willis and R.D.R. Enterprises, on the west by O'Brien Bros and on the south by Kimball Drive. Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. Sidney e. Pager Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission April21, 1984 6;..` 7 0 .. SOUTH L JRLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD LQ 22 JANUARY 2008 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 22 January 2008, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; P. Plumeau, R. Farley, E. Knudsen Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; C. LaRose, Associate Planner; V. Bolduc, E. & J. Goldberg, D. Burke, J. & S. Jewitt, D. Wetzel, S. Farrell, P. Clark, W. Lahue, M. Lahue, H. Popick, D. Dickey, J. Jarvis. 1. Other Business: No issues were raised. 2. Minutes of 8 January 2008: Mr. Farley moved to approve the Minutes of 8 January as written. Mr. Knudsen seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Site Plan Application #SP-08-03 of Farmoore, LLC, to amend a previously approved plan for a 1092 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of converting the building to medical office use, 8 White Street: Mr. Belair said staff has no issue with the shared parking arrangement. Two additional spaces are required for this change in use. Mr. Farrell indicated that they own both properties and will add the 2 spaces, one on each side. Mr. Farley moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-08-03 of Farmoore, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Knudsen seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Site Plan Application #SP-07-105 of Marlee-Bone, LLC, to amend a previously approved plan for a 1109 sq. ft. mixed use building. The amendment consists of allowing required parking for 55 White Street on the property, 31 & 33 Patchen Road: Ms. Clark indicated these are 2 unrelated pieces of property. Mr. Belair said staff has no issues. -1- SOUTH b%.,RLINGTON DEVELOPMENT RE viEW BOARD 22 JANUARY 2008 Mr. Farley moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-07-105 of Marlee-Bone, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Plumeau seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site Plan Application #SP-07-106 of Marlee-Bone, LLC, to amend a previously approved plan for an 1839 sq. ft. mixed use building. The amendment consists of 1) converting 406 sq. ft. of vacant space to general office, and 2) utilizing parking spaces at 31-33 Patchen Road to satisfy on -site parking requirements, 55 White Street: Ms.Clark noted this is the other part of the previous application. Staff had no issues. Mr. Farley moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-07-106 of Marlee-Bone, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Knudsen seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Sketch Plan Application #SD-07-81 of Wedgewood Development Co. for a planned unit development consisting of. 1) six duplexes (12 units) and 2) three single family lots, 232 Autumn Hill Road: Mr. Burke reviewed the history of this application. He said they had been to the DRB in March 2007 for 6 duplexes and 2 carriage units plus the existing Goldberg house. The zoning boundary between the NRP and NRT subzones is currently under review for a change that would allow for 2 single family lots in the mature tree growth area. Mr. Burke said they would like not to propose any separate park feature on the property. Mr. Burke also indicated that they will argue for something other than a cul de sac, possibly a T-intersection. There is a sidewalk planned on the entrance road to what is currently shown as a cul de sac. There would be no sidewalk on the spur road. Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to seriously consider adding curbing and sidewalk on the road serving the duplexes because of potential future connections. Members agree they want curbs and sidewalks on that road. They also prefer a 24-foot road. Mr. Burke said he felt their stormwater plan could be accomplished either way. Mr. Jewitt indicated that he would be interested in the connection to the property to the north. He stressed that future use of Autumn Hill Road would have to be agreed upon by 4 property owners and the city. It would also have to meet concerns of the Fire Chief. Mr. Dinklage indicated that the property to the north should use Black Dog Drive. No other issues were raised. -2- r e► WE !'SW :6.01�1 southburlington PLANNING & ZONING February 26, 2008 Pat Clark 1524 Charlotte Road Hinesburg, VT 05461 Re: Minutes — White St. & Patchen Road Dear Pat: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved January 22, 2008 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, r— "�'Y etsy cD Hough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 24, 2008 Pat Clark 1524 Charlotte Road Hinesburg, VT 05461 Re: Site Plan Application #SP-07-105 & Site Plan Application #SP-07-106 Dear Pat: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on January 22, 2008. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months. Should you have any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT:. 7006 3450 0002 0949 2168 3►-33��ch;en 4 Interested Persons Record and Service List south�x�� "`�3v V E r, Ni.0 kT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: �►�j , �� 8 NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST D cll-kiiv e2 cs-:)-S 1 C,& l� r �- 1 S 2 `I?ar p rc-o P6 (`c PO. �3 7� I L,` � L-e-aAa-ter - Pat) -1�� A S(k, v ,,, V i- 0502 Ca a�A � czc-6 D'k -, f 0Wg"�f Vopl-k r Vev2 kfor(w-k-f 737 Vo OS-1rC'3 �, C� Zed S� - 07-% Interested persons Record and Service List south �xl i _v t) k Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c . 11 HEARING DATE: Jar? NAME MAILING ADDRESS PPn_IFr`T nr: 1KI-moccT �eGti�i CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 18, 2008 Pat Clark 1524 Charlotte Road Hinesburg, VT 05461 Re: 55 White Street and 31/33 Patchen Road Dear Pat: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, January 22, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy c o ough Brown Plannin & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 F n MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner RE: Agenda #s 4&5, #SP-07-105 and SP-07-106 DATE: January 16, 2008 Site Plan application #SP-07-105 of Marlee-Bone, LLC to amend a previously approved plan for a 1109 sq. ft. mixed use building. The amendment consists of allowing required parking for 55 White Street on the property, 31 and 33 Patchen Road. Site Plan application #SP-07-106 of Marlee-Bone, LLC to amend a previously approved plan for a 1839 sq. ft. mixed use building. The amendment consists of 1) converting 406 sq. ft. of vacant space to general office, and 2) utilizing parking spaces at 31-33 Patchen Road to satisfy on -site parking requirements, 55 White Street. The combined proposed uses on the subject properties require twenty-two (22) parking spaces and twenty-seven (27) parking spaces are shown on the plan including one (1) handicapped accessible parking space. The parking requirement is being met. Staff recommends that the Board approve Site Plan application #SP-07-105 and Site Plan application #SP-07-106. City of South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 V E R M 0 N T January 10, 2008 Marlee-Bone, LLC c/o Pat Clark 1524 Charlotte Road Hinesburg, VT 05461 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a draft agenda for the January 22, 2008 Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, I Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. s ,• MCA south? uyfington V C 9 M 0 N T January 10, 2008 Keith Kittredge PO Box 9399 South Burlington, VT 05407 Dear Property Owner: City of Sown Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburl.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the January 22, 2008 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy cDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. City of South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 VE RM 0 N I January 10, 2008 Wasson Vista, LLC 34 Patchen Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburl.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the January 22, 2008 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. City of South Burlington a l�ii. i?MONI' January 10, 2008 Law Offices of Fred Peet 55 Patchen Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Department of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburl.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the January 22, 2008 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, CV C Betsy McDono gh Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. City of South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 January 10, 2008 Chuck Bolton 5 Prouty Parkway South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburi.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the January 22, 2008 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, a-b-I—Bb� Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. s V ENN40NI January 10, 2008 Stella Chastenay-Edmunds 97 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: City of Sou( Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburl.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the January 22, 2008 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Permit Number SP- r 1-1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (N e as shown on deed, mailing ad ss, phone and fax #) �l �rt� IJY�S N ( r�,v -7 -7 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) (/ 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailinia address. nhone and fax 4) A' f /I - I, , -A, 1'-' �? / 3 ✓ �/ 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): 11 J 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: ,3 (' 3,73 1 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property/� including description an size of each separat use) b) Proposed Uses on property (incly4e description and size of each new use and exi tin uses to e If/ remain) �rIW h y�cJL�to c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) .1r,p/,v, d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) 42 f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: a) Building: Existing % / Proposed % / sq. ft. sq. ft. Sq. Ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing _% / sq. ft. Proposed % sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 6 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) (wklipl - 4mardj �4e,(ja 6, 'h1vo- ire d. 4 5T l� f.5 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 3 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: / a / � 7 REVIEW AUTHORITY: O Develo ment Review Board ❑ Administrative p Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Comp. 4 I