Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP-89-0000 - Supplemental - 0010 Patchen RoadCity of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 February 5, 1990 Mr. Richard Farnham P.O. Box 149 Hinesburg, Vermont 05461 Dear Mr. Farnham: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find your copy of Findings of Fact. If you have any questions please call me. Sincerely,� /j 2 Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 May 2, 1989 Mr. Richard Farnham P.O. Box 149 Hinesburg, Vermont 05461 Re: Office Use, 10 Patchen Road Dear Mr. Farnham: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the April 1a, 1989 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Joe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp MCNEIL & MURRAY ATTORNEYS AT LAW A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 271 SOUTH UNION STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TELEPHONE (8021863-4531 FAX (802) 863-1743 JOSEPH C. McNEIL (1919-1978) JOSEPH E. McNEIL FRANCIS X. MURRAY JOHN T. LEDDY NANCY GOSS SHEAHAN STEVEN F.STITZEL PATTI R. PAGE* WILLIAM F. ELLIS LINDAR.I.EROY Facsimile Transmittal Sheet ('ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.1 PLEASE HAND DELIVER IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA �7 PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET TO: NAME: FIRM: FAX # FROM: DATE SENT: TIME: z L If there is any problem receiving this transmission, please call (802)863-4531. Thank you. LAND USE AGREEMENT This agreement entered into and effective this day of March, 1986, by and between and , husband and wife, both of Shelburne, Vermont, and the Town of Shelburne, a municipal corporation located in Chittenden County, State of Vermont; WHEREAS, and are the owners of two contiguous parcels of land acquired by Warranty Deeds of Record in Volume at page and Volume at page of the Shelburne Land Records; and WHEREAS, and desire to develop and use said two parcels of land as a single parcel of land; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the Town of Shelburne issuing a Zoning Permit under its Zoning Regulations for the development of the two above mentioned parcels of land as a single parcel, and agree that from the date of this agreement, the above -stated parcels of land shall constitute a single lot for purposes of compliance with the Town of Shelburne Zoning Regulations. This agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their successors, heirs and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto affixed their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. Dated at Shelburne, Vermont, this day of March, 1986. Dated at Shelburne, Vermont, this day of March, 1986. Town of Shelburne STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. / At Vermont, this day of 19_, and personally appeared, they acknowledged this instrument, by them signed and sealed to be their free act and deed and the free act and deed of STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At 19 , personally appeared Notary Public , Vermont, this day of and they acknowledged this instrument by them signed and sealed to be their free act and deed and the free act and deed fo the Municipality. Notary Public f LAND USE AGREEMENT This agreement entered into and effective this day of April, 1989, by and between Clark W. Hinsdale, Jr. of , Vermont, and the City of South Burlington, Vermont: WHEREAS, Clark W. Hinsdale,Jr. is the owner of two contiguous parcels of land acquired by Warranty Deed of record in volume 127 at page 148 of the South Burlington Land Records; and WHEREAS Clark W. Hinsdale, Jr. desires to use said two parcels of land as a single parcel of land; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City of South Burlington issuing a Site Plan Approval to Farnham Associates Real Estate for the use of the two above mentioned parcels as a single parcel, Clark W. Hinsdale, Jr. agrees that from the date of this agreement and for as long as this Site Plan Approval shall remain in effect, the above stated parcels of land shall constitute a single lot for purposes of compliance with the City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Other than as stated herein, this agreement shall in no way affect Clark W. Hinsdale's rights of ownership or transfer of these parcels. This agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their successors, heirs and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto affixed their hands and seals as of the day and year first written. Dated at , Vermont, this day of April, 1989. Clark W. Hinsdale, Jr. Dated at S.Burlington, Vermont,this day of April, 1989. City of S. Burlington STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , Vermont, this day of 1989, Clark W. Hinsdale Jr. personally appeared, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him signed and sealed to be his free act and deed. STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At 1989, Notary Public , Vermont, this day of personally appeared, and they acknowledged this instrument by them signed and sealed to be their free act and deed and the free act and deed of the municipality. Notary Public t- flo riu+aip� + GR,., /,.T ?�D , �4I � �AT� 5, l3u�L�1►J(�T7�1.� , vT - ;7A'4� toll- rv, v4t4wt THn/'caCw[ ++Dy �ovuv_ 7aa.ha� Tui,J GED�z HELgE — 40NICL P—oV4. H1ZIr! __. FIL. "--�•K-- _ C w� MIXED-k�aDW�4'�� Ask" low wrt �isx+a, 1 I. _ 4� �'' RP►�luq Bev 4 tr C�.veo 41 - tif�i►l.YPytS �M, _ - g ? 3 T4 � � 2ti � • --- hizN L�;� ��TAI�� aG ORNt Riabrsa _ _ _ q.Q MW mb4go _ hl�►� ",Awvw— gzooF�* HMLJTm s ON W X4" POV`S dvm%%P 31 M IU, bERQ w 4¢6uu0 �� �+Aknvtl Azouuo 1`lo Wnw.% -'SPaT4 vierzTOM a stAu ONLY 11C— HYt—r GCR.1.lwz- FxVZA 1J-7r d WHRLC •vY, f 4oD� FATG41 ) R� Z6 'id GO Bo Ica 1) CITY OF SOUTH HUT2LINGTON S ITF, PLAN APPLICATION OWNER OF ItFCORD (name, add re99, phone 1-; m t' o-2401 2) APPLICANT ( name, address, phone QtjNjt �rt�,:-tL- PLWV!&1PA)WTtro2h1 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone r?►L4tafal, 1 .1�"- , i-" -., ga, &4j 1 4) . PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: In Pa-rZ-"L J tzD, 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) --4-- t 1 ( TA -A' Mom, 6) PROPOSED USE (S) V-- 7- \TF' 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, It units, maximum height and floors, square feet per floor) 4t,-,I-Lcj at=ClLl=_ Oj.j l T C)I' 114 5P 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES Jr- lo�o 9 ). LOT COVERAGE: building X; landscaped areas % bKtaU�S building, parking, outside storage % u,W-LPL 5cawlur 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings f fcCC'r , Landscaping S Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) _ 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: &I1g19 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon _; 12-1p.m. 1_; 1-2 p.m._ In 2-3 p.m.__ 3-4 p.m. ; 4-5 p.m.1C; 5-6 p.m.jo; 6-7 p.m. _ 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: Ir dpa A" - 4;(yJ PM 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: �,.,►7�k' ���,___._ _ n I n DATE OF SUBMISSION SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE OF HEARING 0-C DRN< t- w+ - - FtZD POZ7EZ-) E:6T,417F- ' \i� IU PATG4�DJ 2c�, 1 '�, F3U�Lt.._11J(,�rDIJ , VT 7 TAgJ cMPMz µvtge - 4RNtL f�'V4. H�z�rl-.. -. _ F•IG. - GR►h'9� \ w� Mixp7 �1ePpWo� .. - `.µ14Ncjp Neil. swr :..:. •ZH [- ----t- SwN Lis g6.CH141 _ I u" �»" t�gci I - untinaA•�ceor� Pw.m►•p1 ew -- _ — - "tsuwt ,CZ9-WM 7At[ CU VC t wNng yC f 400' lai �i_�q s - oN 4*X4" POV"z, 1S-MP 3' MlU- tf:"P IN fA=VUv •54cTS O72ELT1�DaSVU ONLY PATGia�) RD b 20 40 GO 80 100 ,. Office Copy SIGN APPLICATION CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Date 19 0_ Permit Number Applicant No. Street Town or City State Phone No. Location of sign <14'a-k Name of business No. Street Square footage of sign t'L. Height of Sign Estimated cost 41_ t,� Date of erection Name of Erector 41'r DF IIYJ Q1 , c 14 ELI i MkI[ZN1104 i eo Y 1-q b Address izb Town or City State Phone No. Consent of Owner: The above named person is duly authorized to make application on my behalf. I believe the statements contained herein are true to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Applicant Signature of Owner DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE Application: REJECTED APPROVED Date Reason for rejection Issued to Fee Computation Code Officer Date 19 P.her- TO Yhco-bcd 23 KT Cov6V 60 R DCW, MA019bE "64 �LII iL II, nkrdmilm IM A vres6 XffY M 0CAM so to NA*JCA4V6D Mkt -rebC vac r MAKWARVSD Z3 KT4bw LeA¢ I WRTURAL REDvia0p MCKtIRouuD DARK'Ivf 32! City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 0 PLANNER 658-7955 May 23, 1989 Mr. Richard Farnham P.O. Box 149 Hinesburg, Vermont 05461 Re: Office use, 10 Patchen Road Dear Mr. Farnham: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the April 25, 1989 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please meet the stipulations contained in the approval motion before applying for a building permit. Please call if you have any questions. ncerely, "r."A Joe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp _ _ TNw co�+eac +Ipl, Ab MNK 2EWiOdcD - 1 � � 1 `�4ca'� • • + - �ar�.•S' LI t' ._<--- "t%WT 40CW - PATUKJ.1-X t W11111W "YC t Opp• IsITE PtAt-) I11- 2.4)1_0l► 7 jo,,tiz --- 3 S ACJ917 --. W4 % IF09X&4- i- 1 ZD 1- Oe,,E : TZEAL �STAT� cFF V E• r IU PATG4 1aJ RD. -5 &,V-�-t WirDIJ , NT `151-101 Hlt�t► W/ MIXED F1p¢DW�7 i IN I �_ldlZl�•{ ueah �1 V-V-VA ARC FAV-IJ HAM M11 ,- I A,-Tr-5, I LZ qnr now u'vm� •� � H14H 110[NI NAIL• - - - �r � Owso vgwr_ . 24 - : a 1 IO�IGK�RD DIM�CI �ED�� 41YMN"6L) ' hTloue• �wAW x ` -- `ew I 1 uZty¢ tact-1e1� � hv�►J �ve►�or� �t�oF� MovuT� 441 4"C4� F050b Eutugp bl - 1•aA�1T�Vl.�= q gja F1ouuT� H 9PvTS DI¢EGTYZt>Cz SITU GNLY PATGµa,� QD D 70 40 GO BO IDO TO: FROM: RE: DATE: 1. 2. ,i75 �urs3et street '�''°l�`�`. �autll �iulittgtntt, ]��lermnttt U54i11 'r'�' F1` OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658-7960 SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF GODDETTE TUESDAY APRIL 18,1989 AGENDA ITEMS THURSDAY APRIL 13,1989 FARNHAM ASSOC. REAL ESTATE OFFICE 10 PATCHEN ROAD PLANS WERE REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME THE ONLY PROBLEM I SEE IS THE MAIN DRIVE WAY MUST BE NO LESS THEN 18' FROM PATCHEN ROAD TO THE BACK PARKING LOT PAVED. BLODGETT PROPERTY HOLMES ROAD EXT. PLANS WERE REVIEWED AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM FOR EMERGENCY PROTECTION. 3. MAPLE LEAF MOTEL SHELBURNE ROAD ADDITION PLANS REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: April 18, 1989 agenda items Date April 14, 1989 2)FARNHAM ASSOCIATES, PATCHEN ROAD 1. Concrete curb shall be constructed in abandoned driveway opening. Depressed concrete curb shall be installed in new opening. 2. Plan should show method of draining the site. 4) BLODGETT PROPERTY, HOLMES ROAD EXTENSION 1. Loop drive Holmes Road Extension road openings shall be treated as driveways not as streets. The sidewalk shall be continuous across the driveway. Driveway shall have a depressed curb. 2. Units 1 -6 should be setback toward the north line and the driveway intercept Holmes Road of or near 90 degrees. 3. Holmes Road Extension shall include drainage. 5) MAPLE LEAF MOTEL, SHELBURNE ROAD 1) A sidewalk should be constructed across the entire frontage. 2. A Water District main is located within this driveway. This should be shown on the plan. All work within the water main easement including landscaping shall be reviewed and approved by the Water District. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 April 14, 1989 Mr. Richard Farnham P.O. Box 149 Hinesburg, Vermont 05461 Re: Office building, 10 Patchen Road Dear Mr. Farnham: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also en- closed are Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, April 18, 1989 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. cerrely, Joe Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp 1AR --v� �o-� )-X,-vN -n-") 411d - -dot? 0 M cfn t'.1 � �d ),� )q 11 .,� M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: April 25, 1989 agenda items Date: April 21, 1989 1) FARNHAM ASSOCIATES, OFFICE USE, 10 PATCHEN ROAD Richard Farnham proposes to convert former retail space in a mixed retail/residential building to office use at 10 Patchen Road. At last week's meeting, I was instructed to look into the history of the apartment use on the site and talk with City Attorney Steve Stitzel regarding use of the adjoining lot for parking. Listed below is a chronology of uses at 10 Patchen Road. Use o Single-family residence. Date prior to 9/75 o Received multiple use variance to convert house into 2nd floor 9/75 apartment and first floor funeral home. o Received Planning Commission approval for funeral home/apartment use. 10/75 o Received conditional use approval from City Council for conversion of first 1/79 floor to office use and continue apartment on second floor. o Conversion of first floor office use to retail use (antique shop). Never went ? in front of Planning Commission. 1 Memorandum - Planning April 25, 1989 agenda items April 21, 1989 Page 2 Land Use/ Lot Merger Agreement: Steve Stitzel advised that a Land Use/Lot Merger Agreement should be filed which indicates that the proposed office/retail use at 10 Patchen Road will use the adjacent lot to the north to meet parking requirements. This means that if the property owner to the north ever comes in to construct a building, he/she must not only meet minimum zoning requirements for his/her project, but, on top of that, also maintain the zoning requirements (parking) designated for 10 Patchen Road. The stipulation in the approval motion should read as follows: "A Land Use/Lot Merger Agreement shall be filed in the land records which indicates that the proposed office/residential use at 10 Patchen Road may use the lot to the north to meet parking requirements. This agreement shall be submitted to the City Attorney for review and approval, signed and filed in the land records prior to permit. 2) PUBLIC ROAD/PRIVATE DRIVE POLICY Sonny Audette and Bill Szymanski will be present at Tuesday's meeting to discuss a public road/private drive policy for the City. 3) ZONING AMENDMENTS, ARTICLE XVIII AND TABLE III Enclosed are the proposed amendments to Article XVIII, "Traffic Overlay District" and Table III to include a City Center Traffic overlay zone (zone 6). Properties located within the City Center Zone would be limited to 45 peak hour trip ends per 40,000 square feet of land. 4) DISCUSSION, CITY CENTER ZONING Enclosed is a list of the work still needed to be completed and areas of concern related to the City Center Zone. 2 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 April 21, 1989 Mr. Richard Farnham P.O. Box 149 Hinesburg, Vermont 05461 Re: Office use, 10 Patchen Road Dear Mr. Farnham: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658.7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, April 25, 1989 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. Sincerely, Joe Weith, City Planner 1 Enc1 JW/mcp M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re April 18, 1989 agenda items Date: April 14, 1989 2) FARNHAM ASSOCIATES REAL ESTATE, 10 PATCHEN ROAD Richard Farnham proposes to convert former retail space to office space in the downstairs of 10 Patchen Road. According to the applicant, an upstairs rental unit (a non -conforming use) has existed for many years. Applicant intends to continue this use. The property is located in the Commercial 1 District and in zone 1 of the Traffic Overlay District. The western side of the lot faces Patchen Road. Across the street is a mobile gas station. To the north and south there are similar structures (converted residences), one housing a beauty salon and the other, a video store. To the rear (east) of the lot are chiropractic offices, on Cottage Grove Road. The surrounding neighborhood is of mixed use; commercial, single- family and multi -family housing. Coverage: All coverage requirements are met. Frontage & Setbacks: The property is a preexisting non- conforming use and structure. Of frontage and setback requirements, only the rear yard setback is satisfactory. Required Frontage. on Patchen Road 200' Front yard setback from Patchen Road 50' Side yard setback 15' Actual 150' 24' 12.5' 1 Memorandum - Planning April 18, 1989 agenda items April 14, 1989 Page 2 Access & Circulation: Access from Patchen Road is via an existing 15' paved drive. Circulation is shown towards the rear of the building to a paved parking lot. Access from this paved drive provides circulation to the northwest and southeast portions of the lot to a gravelled parking area. An existing 17 foot wide curb cut would be closed. I would suggest increasing the entrance drive to 20 feet wide. Also the 29 foot wide gravel aisle should be reduced to 24 feet to preserve green space. Parking: Parking required for this combination of uses is 6 spaces, including 1 handicapped space. The plan shows 16, including 1 handicapped space. Are 16 spaces necessary? Traffic: The property is allowed 7 peak hour trips (Traffic Overlay Zone 1). The current use (retail/residential) generates 6 peak hour trips based on ITE. The new use will generate 4 peak hour trips based on ITE. Landscaping: The project requires $450 in landscaping value. Applicant intends to save all existing trees, (oak, spruce, elm and tamarack) plants and shrubbery (yew and crab) and plant some perennial flowers. The existing site is well landscaped. 3) IBIS CORPORATION, 3-LOT SUBDIVISIONL SPEAR STREET IBIS Corporation proposes to subdivide a 6.8 acre parcel into 3 lots of 1.9, 2.3 and 2.6 acres. The property is located on the east side of Spear Street directly across Deerfield Drive. Lot. #1 has an existing single-family house. At the 3/21/89 meeting, it was decided to postpone the hearing in order to obtain an opinion from the City Attorney on the Planning Commission's authority to regulate the location and size of houses on a lot in order to preserve views. I met the City Attorney to discuss this issue. It is not clear whether the Planning Commission has authority under Sections 417(g) and (m) of the subdivision regulations since the introduction to this section references only "major" subdivisions. This subdivision is a minor subdivision. However, the Planning Commission may have authority to limit building size and location under SEctions 411, 412, and 505. These sections are described below: 2 PLANNING COMMISSION 18 APRIL 1989 PAGE 2 approval unless the K -Mart attorney had something significant to say. Ms. Pugh moved to table the item until later in the evening. Ms Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Site plan application of Richard Farnham for conversion of a 1960 sq. ft. building with mixed retail/residential use to mixed office/residential use, 10 Patchen Rd. Mr. Farnham said this building is adjacent to the video store almost to the corner of Williston Rd. They propose to turn it into a real estate office downstairs. The residential use upstairs will remain. There are now 3 curb cuts onto the site which will be reduced to one paved curb cut. New land- scaping beds will be placed near the front of the building and there will be a general upgrading and cleaning up of the site. The walk in front will be repaired. The building will be repainted. Mr. Burgess questioned how an apartment was ever approved up- stairs as it is an illegal us that cannot be grandfathered. He asked that this be looked into after this application is acted upon. Mrs. Maher asked if the applicant would object to widening the entrance to 20 ft. Mr. Farnham said it is now 16 ft. with grass on both sides and is the widest driveway on the street. Mr. Weith felt that for a commercial property with only 1 access 20 ft. should be required (Sect. 19.103b). He also felt the 29 ft. gravel area could be reduced to 24 ft. which would allow for more green space. Mr. Jacob said if the applicant found they needed more parking space, they could come back to the Commission. Mrs. Maher suggested waiving the $450 landscaping bond. Mr. Jacob felt some railroad ties or shrubs should be placed at the edge of the grass to discourage people from using the old curb cut. Mr. Farnham noted the site is actually 2 lots which are used as one. Mr. Craig and Mr. Burgess had a problem with this as the lot owners might come in to build on the lot where parking is now planned. It would have to be made clear that one lot cannot be reviewed without the other and that this approval involves both lots. Mr. Craig said he would like the City Attorney to review this wording so that if a problem ever occurs, he has the wording he needs. Mrs. Maher moved to continue the Site Plan until next week. Mr. Craig seconded. Motion passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION 25 APRIL 1989 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 23 April 1989, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present Peter Jacob, Chairman; William Burgess, William Craig, Catherine Peacock, John Belter, Mary -Barbara Maher Also Present Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Richard Farnham, Greg Dicovitsky; William Szymanski, City Manager 1. Continue Site Plan application Richard Farnham f� con- version of a 1960 sq. ft. building wi- mixed residential/ retail use to mixed office/residential use, 10 Patchen Road Mr. Farnham noted the 20 ft. paved entrance is shown and the westerly line is drawn on parking. Mr. Weith said they were to reduce the amount of gravel from 29' to 24'. Mr. Farnham said they would like to keep it at 29 ft. as it is graveled now. Mr. Weith said the final issue was the merging of the two lots. Since both lots are owned by Clark Hinsdale, it is the City Attorney's opinion that they are one lot because they have been used as such for a long time. They are on one tax bill as well. Ms. Peacock moved the Planning Commission approve the Site Plan application of Farnham Associates for conversion of a 1960 sq. ft. retail/residential building located on a 21,450 sq. ft. lot, to office/residential use as depicted on a plan entitled "Farnham Associates Real Estate Office, Site Plan,." prepared bV Richard Farnham Associates and dated 4/4/89, last revised 089 with the following stipulations: 1. The applicant shall Traffic Impact Area #1 to be generated by the contribute $210 to the Williston Road program project. based on the 4 peak hour trips 2. The zoning permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Belter seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 2. Discussion regarding a private drive/public roadway policy Members asked if there had been any requests from condo de- velopments to make their drives public roads. Mr. Szymannki said there have been inquiries from Winding Brook, Ridgewood, 4/25/89 JW MOTION OF APPROVAL locc- 4fd cm a.� 2/) ySa sg -4. lof I move the South Burlington Planning Co ission approve the Site Plan application of Farnham Associates or conversion of a 1,960 square foot retail/residential building to office/residential use as depicted on a plan titled "Farnham Associates Real Estate Office, Site Plan," prepared by Richard Farnham Associates and dated 4/4/89, last revised 4/20/89, with the following stipula- tions: -V---The._,Plan shall be revised prior to pgrm�,t--to show the follow- ing: -... _... 1- - a) a note ind.i.cafing that a depressed concrete curb shall be installed across driveway opening; and b ) an - -aisle width of 24 feet for--t.he aisle in the gravel ,�Sarking area, instead of 29 feet as'currently shown. -1,g) The applicant shall contribute $210 to the Williston Road Traffic Impact Area #1 program based on the 4 peak hour trips to be generated by this project. 3 ) - A --revised--�arr--r�-ddr,�.ng-...-s•�-�-p�x submitted to _the—�i'ty lanner- ar ty prior to. -permit. e applicant shall record a e 2 lots i� T eement shall permit and s e review rove prio ecording. ©n- #.1. above shall be Engineer for approval —agreement combining the be recorded prior to d by the City Attorney 24 X) The zoning permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Name: �Os IWF-lll+ Contact 5n-� �-r"-�L TELEPHONE MEMO Date: 41 vs 1 E31 Subject Lar Ava--77 OJ FA4LN*fAA-,S s v Ole 74' Signature 1. sIZe = ''lS�X i�3' _ �� -7 sF Z, Cy YC I ZA UC ' yY 24 Iz1 g/ �n17is OA L Z�- �z 1 UV ,,2�or7 �Lo O — AtiC.�gS 33 67 ��o�7a-s I PA rz k I" G- = 4 5 PA-c. E- s —rR*GF1 c o v'F►2-" :. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone *)_ WIN 2) APPLICANT ( name, address, phone 0) PD> 45''Z 'Z797n P.D. I3&X K,11 N 11�1 -S �UiZLTT� 3) CONTACT PERSON ( name, address, phone R o x 14!jT Iyg'tau VAj t 4). PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) i (TAX Mom, 6) PROPOSED USE(S) �TATt= OFE=IL 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and i floors, square feet per floor) 11-11 (=t_ct0- !�34 !e.F -2F,D VL.oCz Dom. r WT up Tb(A1.-196051= IDLY) Lj 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 6o Ixyzkrvt,�� 9). LOT COVERAGE: building %; landscaped areas CL % D�z�uES building, parking, outside storage% 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ f45C>00 , Landscaping f 'baU Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) f 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: �II�Ig9 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 10 ; 12-1p.m. 1r, ; 1-2 p.m. in 2-3 p.m._�_ 3-4 p.m. Z i 4-5 p.m.l_: 5-6 p.m.in; 6-7 p.m. _ 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION:- 10 ;are A" — 4 " w PM 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION:yL��c' DATE OF SUBMISSION SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE OF HEARING 1,s�����b Ll rl Findinr�s of Fact #f4Cn437 Page 3 tion of the storrmater outfall from the cul-de-sac. 2-3. There is sufficient wader available and no existing water supply will be unreasonably burdened: i) The applicants estim to that water demand of the project will be approximately 1500 g llons per day. If the cumulative water de- mand of the lots exce ds 1S00 g.p.d., the Commission will require the permittees to sub 't additional evidence that a burden will not result. ii) The project will be se by municipal water from the Champlain Water District. The Co ission accepts the letter (Exhibit #6) from the District that th re is sufficient water available and the project will not restrict or encumber present consumers. iii) The Department of Health ha approved the design of the water line extensions within the projec (Exhibit #14) iv) William Szymanski and Robert G dner have stated that the project will have no undue effect on th municipal water system. (Exhibits #7 F, #8) 4. There will be no unreasonable soil erosion or effects on the capacity of the land to hold ~,rater: \ i) The soils are primarily sandy and slope toward Muddy Brook. Most of the proposed road will be filled; the slope for the decelera- tion lane\is the only cut slope, which will be graded to 1 on 3. All construction on the cut slon_e, including seeding and mulching Will be done within 5 days. ii) Temporary sou%inMuddv controls are depicted on Exhibits #37, #38, #39. They f hay hales around catch basins, along the toe of the fifor the road, and at the outlet of the dis- charge swales Brook. iii) Permanent erorols consist of a rip -rapped ditch from the cul-de-sac tok and a 1S' rip -rapped section at the out - fall from theunder Roiite•2: iv) The applicants have calculated storm runoff to be 1.5 cfs for a 25 year storm with an intensity of 4"/hour. The existing 18" RCP culvert across Route 2 has a present capacity of 40 cfs and a velocity of 18'/second when flowing full. The culvert is pre- sently not in use at all and will pick up drainage from S catch basins along the first section of road, the deceleration lane, and entrance. v) Construction on each lot will be reviewed for erosion control when amendment applications are made for buildings on the lots. S. This project will not cause unreasonable safety or congestion condi- tions with respect to highways or other means of transportation: i) Williston Road has the capacity to accommodate the additional CO I �l f [A, I/A ro 4 cl ell 6-7 Or'O D st , I -I o j vpUlw st L& �'l � Al 6c 21r, e)Io CALCS cX(if ih` Vat � vuv Pa,o nos;) S A���.. OF FI Ll off do� 'r W�()/p 0(1 , �ti /,c�t 44 so or 0 m <,4-, -4'44-q PLANNING COMMISSION 10 FEBRUARY 1987 PAGE 2 Mr. Dunn noted that Mr. Szymanski had asked that the sidewalk be moved back 5 ft. He felt this would negate all the planting they are trying to do. He felt it would also be safer to have the trees which would provide a sense of scale for drivers. Mr. Dunn noted they are going to save all existing trees, when possible, and relocate them in other locations on the lots. Mrs. Lafleur noted Mr. Syzmanski wants a deceleration lane on Hinesburg Rd. to start at the corner. This would require an easement from the bank and may also involve 2 power poles. Mr. Pomerleau felt the bank needs the parking near the entrance. He said a safety concern is that turning cars will get into the deceleration lane and want to get out of it if they are not turning. This will turn the deceleration lane into an acceleration as they speed up to get out of the lane. Mr. F,t2Qavckclk" t suggested a compromise, angling the curb line and also lining up the Hinesburg Rd. entrance with the main Parclungl� traffic aisle. Mrs. Lafleur stressed that the highest .1 priority should be safety. Mr. Jacob said he felt it would be a shame to throw out the landscaping work. Mr. Burgess agreed and felt the deceleration lane all the way to the corner could be more of a hazard. Mrs. Poger noted that on Dorset St. the deceleration lane is often used by trucks for parking and for the bus stop. This creates a very dangerous situation as cars have to go around them. A resident noted that the major problem is the left turn into Gracey's, and Mr. Jacob felt this plan might help. He said the city might. also ask CCTA to relocate the bus stop. Mr. Burgess asked how much stacking room there will be in the drive and felt it would still be a problem to cross the driveway access. Mr. said they will put in a stop sign to regulate the flow of bank traffic toward the exit. Mr. Crevier said the problem is you have to drive across the incoming lane to get to the outgoing lane, and this blocks the flow of traffic. He recommended a third drive lane, from 24 to 29 ft. to accommodate additional traffic from the bank. Mr. Pomerleau said then they would have to eliminate the sidewalk behind the Bolton block. Mr. Spitz then presented the traffic study. He said the plan is for the Hinesburg Rd. access to the shopping center to be unsignalized. The Midas road access will be signalized and possibly White Street as well. He felt a level of service "C" can be attained at Williston Rd/Hinesburg Rd. The jury is still out on the question of an advance green on Williston Rd. from the Williston direction. They feel that the level PLANNING COMMISSION 10 FEBRUARY 1987 PAGE 3 of service at the Midas Rd. can be "B" but this will not help (or hurt) the White St. problem. Mr. Jacob said the Com- mission will insist the lights be monitored to be sure they are set up right. Craig Leiner said he still does not like the 2 ingresses on Williston Rd, because turning cars slow traffic and create conflict points. Mrs. Maher suggested that at some point in the future, when the Bolton block is re -oriented to the rear, the Commission review the accesses to see if either or both can then be closed. Mr. Leiner said if the accesses remain, he suggests stop signs on the site and the relocation of the 2 parking spaces that back out toward the access. Mr. Pomerleau said he agreed with the stop signs but felt that since there are only 11 parking spaces for the businesses, the 2 spaces were vital for them. Mr. Jacob noted that a 90-degree corner was not possible at White St. at this point in time. Mr. Leiner felt the location has to be treated as a whole, and that with proper equipment and timing, it could work. He felt they should run 2 signals off one controller for Midas and White St. He felt this would also help alleviate stacking up for the turn into White St. from Williston Road. Mr. Spitz said if White St. is included, it will become a 70-second cycle and could then include the 8 seconds needed for an advance green on Williston Rd/Hinesburg Rd. (from Williston direction). Bill Bissonette questioned whether cars queueing beyond the entrance to Al's would cause them problems. A 5-second Advance green, he felt, would solve that. Mr. Leiner felt that by including White St. and phasing it correctly, access to Al's could be assured without an advance green. Mr. Bissonette said they would like to be part of the planning process and added they have been very pleased with their relationship with Pomerleau to date. Mrs. Maher asked what affect salt will have on landscaping Anot�ePen, Mr. Pomerleau said that all sediment from the parking lot will be disconnected from the system and will be filtered. Mrs. Maher asked if there will be a Commerce Square sign at Midas Rd. Mrs. Lafleur said they can have only one free- standing sign per lot, so she suggested a sign that lists all the businesses on the lot. Mrs. Hurd moved that the Planning Commission grand final plat approval to Antonio Pomerleau & Vermont Federal Bank for con- struction of a 30,750 sq. ft. addition to the Grand Union Shopping Center, a 106-room hotel, and a 1161 sq. ft. PLANNING COMMISSION 10 FEBRUARY 1987 PAGE 4 addition to the bank as depicted on a 5 page set of plans en- titled "Commerce Square: Pomerleau Real Estate, South Bur- lington, Vermont," dated January 1987 prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, and a landscaping plan entitled "Commerce Square, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Dunn Associates dated January 20, 1987 with the following stipulations: 1. A $37,000 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. Revised plans showing the retention of existing trees within the parking areas shall be submitted to the Planner for approval prior to permit. 2. A sewer allocation of 22,800 gpd (21,200 hotel, 60 bank, & 1538 shopping center) is granted in accordance with the South Burlington Sewer Policy. The $2.50 per gallon sewer fee shall be paid prior to permit. This project is placed on the waiting list and no permit shall be issued until capacity is available. 3. All legal documents for the future City street, main- tenance waivers, sewer and water lines and fire hydrant ease- ments shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to permit. 4. Bonds for construction of the "Midas" road extension and sidewalk shall be posted prior to permit. It shall include concrete curbs. 5. The applicant shall obtain written permission from the School Department for construction of the Midas road across school property prior to construction of the road. 6. The Planning Commission approves 387 parking spaces and waives 97 (200) for shared parking. The 3 spaces on the south of the Hinesburg Rd. drive shall be relocated and a revised plan approved by the Planner prior to permit. 7. A contribution toward the Williston Rd. improvements fund shall be made prior to permit. The amount shall be determined by the Planner prior to permit.. 8. Two new traffic signals, any new controllers or upgrades, and signal adjustments shall be paid for by the applicant. All signals shall be monitored at the applicant's expense the Regional Planning Traffic Engineer and the applicant for a period of one year after construction. 9. The Hinesburg Rd. deceleration land shall be tapered at the corner and the curb shall be uniform around the inter- section. PLANNING COMMISSION 10 FEBRUARY 1987 PAGE 5 10. The Hinesburg Rd. entrance drive shall be redesigned to line upp with the main aisle of the parking lot and not be off rpnt-Pr _ 11. The revision to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk at the corner of Williston Rd. shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to permit. 12. All curbs including inside the parking lot, shall be cast in place concrete, not asphalt or precast concrete. 13. Storm drain pipes shall be concrete and plastic. Storm - drain outlet pipes shall include headwalls. 14. A 6-inch sewer pipe shall be used to serve the expanded shopping center due to the difficult construction on Hines- burg Rd. 15. Fire hydrant easements (10 feet x 10 feet) shall be deeded to the City for existing hydrants along Williston Rd. 16. Revised plans reflecting the above changes shall be approved by the Planner prior to recording. 17. It is the applicant's responsibility to record the final plat with the City Clerk within 90 days or this approval is null and void. It shall be approved by the Planner and signed �2y the Chairman or Clerk of the Commission prior to recording. 18. The building permit shall be obtained within 3 years or this approval is null and void Mr. Belter seconded the motion. Mrs. Maher moved to amend the motion to include the following stipulation: If and when all the stores in the Bolton block are re -oriented with access on the reverse side, the developer shall return to the Planning Commission for discussion of closing the westerly ingress to the Bolton block stores. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion to amend. In the votes which followed, both the amendment and the motion passed unanimously. 3. Sketch plan application of Invrest for subdivision of 29.6 acres into 13 industrial -commercial lots located on the former Willis land, 200 Shunpike Rd.