Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0200 Old Farm Road (4)CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPAK'I'MENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4 106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March z8, zooz Tom Crowley, President Georgetown Homeowner Association 125 Kennedy Drive #35 S. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4io6 or attend the schedule public hearing. Sinc rely, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl./td C Officer ME O R A N D I U M alter mini TO: Chuck Hafter, The Development Review Board at their 4/16/02 meeting asked that I contact you with regards to requesting the State to reduce the speed limit on a portion of Hinesburg Road. The Board is in the process of reviewing a 107 unit planned residential development with a new City street intersecting with Hinesburg Road directly across from Hayes Avenue. The concern was express that without a traffic signal at this intersection, it would be difficult for pedestrians to cross Hinesburg Road. The Board has asked that the City request the State to reduce the speed limit in this area to make it safer for pedestrians to cross the street. r� J� oeNQ rVa ��-� 3 S —Vpti 4/2/02 MOTION OF APPROVAL O'BRIEN HOME FARM —FINAL PLAT APPLICATION, HINESBURG ROAD AND KENNEDY DRIVE I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve final plat application #SD-02-18 of Daniel and Leo O'Brien Jr., dba Forest Park Realty Corp. and the O'Brien Family Limited Partnership for a 107 unit planned residential development consisting of 18 buildings and a five (5) lot subdivision, as depicted on 29 page set of plans, page three (3) entitled, "O'Brien Home Farm Old Farm Road South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, dated May 1, 2001, last revised on 2/�5/02, with the following stipulations: J 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are Trot superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the first lot or start of utility or road construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for the proposed public roads, city park, and utility, sewer, drainage, water and recreation path, etc.) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 3) Prior to start of construction of the improvements described in condition 92 above, the applicant shall post a bond which covers the cost of said improvements. 4) In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., roads, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc.) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer, "as - built" construction drawings certified by a licensed engineer. 5) The plat plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval by the Director of Planning and Zoning (hereinafter Director). Four copies of the approved revised plat plans shall be submitted to the Director prior to recording. a. The final plat plans shall be revised to show the setback distances for buildings #8, 131, 133, 135, 137, 169, and 170 on Stonington Circle and 20 and 39 on Lancaster Lane, which do not meet the 30 foot front yard setback requirement. b. The final plat plans shall be revised to show the location of all proposed lighting and reflect the quantities on sheet L5. c. The final plat plans shall be revised to show mailbox clusters if proposed. These clusters shall be located outside of the proposed city street right-of- way. d. The final plat plans shall be revised to reflect the comments of the city arborist. e. The final plat plans shall be revised to show the proposed street on the Official Map connecting Old Farm Road and Hinesburg Road. f. The final plat plans shall be revised to eliminate the three different street names and shall be changed to a single street name. g. The final plat plans shall be revised to indicate the size of the dwelling units. h. The final plat plans shall be revised to show the remaining two lots numbered as lots #4 and #5. i. The final plat plans shall be revised to show underground power, telephone, and T.V. lines placed outside of the street R.O.W. J. The final plat plans shall be revised to include plans of the gas main. k. The final plat plans shall be revised so the -traffic island at intersection of Eldredge Street and Kennedy Drive is set back two (2) feet from edge of Kennedy Drive. 1. The final plat plans (sheet 1) shall be revised to add a notation that lot #3 is a future city park. ` A, %/fie M. G i��! 6) The stonnwat rete Intion facilities on the 15.6-acre lot shall be privately maintained by the homeowners association for lot # 1 and by the developer/applicant for lot #2. 7) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for any construction on lot # 1 the applicant shall post a $48,000 bond, and before any construction on lot 92, the applicant shall post a $31,460 bond. Prior to the start of construction of the public street, the applicant shall post a $64,520 bond for the street trees. These bonds shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 8) Prior to zoning permit issuance, the applicant shall submit exterior lighting details (cut sheets) for all proposed lighting on the buildings. 9) The developer shall be responsible for purchase and installation of all traffic signs. 10) All the residential buildings on lot 92 shall be sprinklered and alarmed, and the residential buildings on lot #1 shall be alarmed. 11) No structures shall be permitted in the PUD setback area provided in Section 26.154 (d) of the zoning regulations unless approved as part of this development and shown on the approved plans. 12) Pursuant to Section 40 1. 1 (k) (b) (3) of the subdivision regulations, the Board waives Section 40 1. 1 (k) (b) (2) of the subdivision regulations and allows the two (2) private streets to have more than 20 units. It is the Board's opinion that these streets would improve traffic safety conditions and not adversely affect the public good and welfare of the community. 13) Pursuant to Section 10.404 of the zoning regulations, the Board modifies the front yard setback requirements for units #8, 131, 133, 135, 137, 169, and 170 on Stonington Circle, and 20 and 39 on Lancaster Lane as shown on the approved plan. C , O y) 4, 14) Pursuant to Section 25.113 (b) of the Zoning Re lations, the Board approves a 5 foot increase in height for buildings at 20,E 39 ancaster Lane to maximum of 45 feet from the average pre -construction grade. is the Board's opinion that the criteria under Section 25.113 (b) (i) (iii) of the zoning regulations are being met. 15) Prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit, the applicant shall construct left -turn lanes on Hinesburg Road at Magalloway Street to serve the project. 16) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall submit homeowners documents which include language that: 1) the garages will not be turned into living spaces, and 2) no recreational vehicles shall be kept on the premises. 17) The final plat plan (survey plat and sheets 3, and 5) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Board Chair of Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plans, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat and sheets 3, and 5 in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the Director of Planning and Zoning. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 2 APRIL 2002 PAGE 2 4. Consent Agenda: a. Design review application #DR-02-04 of Rick Scott, requesting approval of a master signage plan, 372 Dorset Street. No issues were raised. Ms. Quimby moved to approve the consent agenda subject to the stipulation in the Staffs memorandum. Mr. Kupferman seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-02-18 of Daniel and Leo O'Brien, Jr., DBA Forest Park Realty Corp., and the O'Brien Family Limited Patnership for a 107 unit planned residential development consisting of 18 buildings and a five lot subdivision, Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive: Mr. O'Brien reviewed changes made between preliminary and final plat. At preliminary, there were to be 6 lots, there are now 5 (the '/2 acre pocket park has been removed). Lot #1 consists of townhouses (Stonington), lot #2 is multi -family (Lancaster), lot #3 will be forever open, lot #4 is an O'Brien parcel, lot #5 is Forest Park Partnership. There has been a change in the Lancaster Lane part of the project. An archeologically sensitive area was found that would have to be studies. They decided to avoid this. Lot coverage was thus reduced from 17.2% to 14.5% and overall coverage was reduced from 3 9. 1 % to 37%. There will be 4 15-plexes, all with underground parking. Density was increased from 56 to 60 units. Units will be one and two -bedroom. Mr. Hausner said there were concerns regarding orientation of one building and setback from the wetland. So they moved one building out of the wetland setback. Two other buildings were rotated closer to the open space in order to move the one building back 10 feet. A city street will be built from Kennedy Drive to Rt. 116. The streets within the development will be private. 106 parking spaces are required on lot #1 and 126 are being provided. 135 are required on lot #2 and 138 are being provided. There will be language prohibiting parking of RV's on the premises. They have received a draft of a stormwater permit from the State. The Association will be responsible for maintenance of the stormwater retention ponds. There will be no encroachment into the CO zone. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 2 APRIL 2002 PAGE 3 They are requesting a height waiver for 4 buildings in Lancaster Lane (5 ft waiver). The extra height would require an extra setback and they are requesting a waiver for that extra setback. Mr. Hausner showed what buildings would look like from the public street. There will be some rock walls and plantings to dress up the area. Mr. O'Brien said they are also requesting setback waivers for 8 units which he showed on the plan. Mr. Cameron asked why the road can't come further to the south to avoid having any waivers. Mr. O'Brien said that would encroach on future development on the south side of the street. Mr. Boucher said he was struggling with that as the developer has the flexibility not to have to ask for waivers. Mr. Kupferman said he was also not in favor of this solution for this project since the Board does not know any details of the land to the south of the road. He said the Board has been pretty strong with setbacks. Mr. Kupferman had less of a concern with the height waiver request on Lancaster. Mr. Belair said he cannot recall any condo developments where the Board has granted setback waivers. Mr. Marcellino said that in reality these buildings front on the loop road. What will be seen is a side yard. He added that they would do a lovely landscape plan in the side yards. Mr. O'Brien suggested moving the bike path to the other side of the street and moving the right-of-way. Mr. Belair said they can just move the right-of-way. Mr. Cameron said the problem for him is not having a concept of a master plan. He felt that good planning would let him look at that, and taking it "on faith" doesn't work for him. Mr. Kupferman said he wouldn't object to exploring moving the right-of-way. Mr. Belair said he would want to see a plan of that and have it reviewed by the City Engineer, etc. Ms. Budd of the Rec Path Committee said that not knowing what is going on the south side made it difficult for her to discuss moving the Rec Path especially as it was considered for use by the residents of this development. Mr. O'Brien said he was willing to look at. Ms. Budd asked how the ends of the Rec Path would be handled. Mr. O'Brien said the Public Works Director doesn't want a median or lights slowing down traffic. But there is a sidewalk on both sides of Kennedy Drive. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 2 APRIL 2002 PAGE 4 Ms. Moreland of Georgetown asked about impact from exhaust chimneys from the garages. Mr. O'Brien said a majority would be fresh air. The chimneys would be 44 ft. in the air, not adjacent to Georgetown. Mr. Boucher noted receipt of a letter from the traffic consultant indicating that the project would fall within acceptable limits with the Kennedy Drive project in place. With regard to drainage, it was noted that all drainage will be brought to one of 3 detention ponds. Ms. Yankowski asked what happens if the ponds go over the limit. The engineer indicated they are "overdesigned" and will retain a 25-year storm event. Ms. Yankowski said there could be water coming up that fills the ponds since the soil is mostly clay. Ms. Barnard said the Board should consider whether this development is consistent with other developments and is aesthetically compatible. Mr. Belair said it needs to comply with the comprehensive plan. Ms. Barnard asked how they could know if they are compatible if nobody has an idea what the buildings will look like. She said she was concerned with her line of sight and who would be looking into her bedroom from their living room. She wanted to know what will be 60 ft. from her house. Mr. Hausner showed a representation of what the houses will look like. Mr. Cameron moved to continue the application until 16 April. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Public Hearing: Application #CU-02-05 of Fletcher A. Downing for conditional use approval under Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to: 1) apply the R2 District zoning criteria to a portion of 133 Westview Drive, and 2) apply the RI District zoning criteria to a portion of 99 Westview Drive: Mr. Barone said the Downings would have to move their house 20 ft. to the west and closer to a neighbor's house. They want a property line adjustment instead. Mr. Belair said staff has no concerns. Mr. Cameron moved to approve Application #CU-02-05 of Fletcher A. Downing subject to the stipulations in the draft motion of 2 April 2002. 7. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-02-17 of Fletcher A. Downing for a boundary line adjustment between 99 Westview Drive and 133 Westview Drive: I{REBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc, March 29, 2002 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: O'Brien Home Farm SC-01-34 Dear Ray, 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 Fax (802) 878-9618 In regards to the above mentioned application, we are seeking waivers for the front yard setbacks for the following units: STREET ADDRESS # 20 Lancaster Lane # 39 Lancaster Lane # 8 Stonington Circle # 131 Stonington Circle # 133 Stonington Circle # 135 Stonington Circle # 137 Stonington Circle # 139 Stonington Circle # 169 Stonington Circle # 170 Stonington Circle PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACK SETBACK 23' 35'* 32' 35'* 20' 30' 27' 30' 23' 30' 20' 30' 14' (deck) 20' (building) 30' 27' (deck) 30' 15' 30' 15' 30' * The required front yard setback is 35' due to the increase in height from 40 to 45 feet. However, a waiver has also been requested to allow for the height increase. We acknowledge that mailboxes must be out of the City right-of-way. We are working with the post office to determine the locations within the limits of Stonington Circle and Lancaster Lane. We are evaluating locations for bike racks within the limits of Stonington Circle and Lancaster Lane. Enclosed are plans with the proposed building setbacks, as well as the possible locations for clustered mail boxes and bike racks, identified as red ink "markups". Ray Belair March 29, 2002 Page Two We are also enclosing a red ink markup of the overall site plan which re -labels the zoning district as R1. We will incorporate these minor revisions into the plans, along with any other revisions which may result from the final plat review, and submit final approved plans. Please feel free to call if you have any questions or comments regarding this matter. Very truly yours, Michael J. Burke, P.E. MJB/dcw enclosure cc: O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. u f SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 March 15, 2002 Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 RE: O'Brien Home Farm South Burlington The South Burlington Water Department has been informed that a revised set of plans has been submitted to the Planning and Zoning Office for review. Please supply this department with a revised set of plans when they become available. Construction of the water system shall not be started without the approval of the water system by this department. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sine rely, Jay Nadeau Superintendent Cc. Stephanie Smith Oman Analytics Planning for Transportation and Community P.O. Box 216 Underhill Center, VT 05490 (802) 899-3146 e-mail: omananalyt@aol.com March 4, 2002 Ms. Carol Barnard 630 Hinesburg Road, 420 South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ms. Barnard: As you requested, I have reviewed your traffic material relative to the O'Brien Home Farm development. As I have previously discussed with you, in general, the levels of impact fall within acceptable parameters for this location. However, I should add that this result is entirely dependent on the completion of proposed improvements to the Kennedy Dr/Hinesburg Rd intersection. Without these, the intersection will operate in failure even without the proposed development, and would certainly be unacceptable for the additional traffic loadings envisioned for this project. Levels of service as envisioned here without these improvements (LOS "F" and "E" overall in the AM and PM peak hours respectively) are clearly unacceptable from a congestion point of view. Further, congestion at this level is associated with safety issues including driver impatience, inappropriate gap acceptance, and other unsafe maneuvers. It is clear to me from a traffic point of view, this development should not go forward until these improvements are in place. I hope this has been helpful. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. t,czy } Michael F. Oman Principal DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO April 2, 2002 MEETING Lighting: The signs are interior lit. Staff suggests the interior light should be florescent. Location of Signs on Buildings: The location of each of the wall signs in the gable ends on opposite sides of the building as shown in the illustrations provided. Material: The wall signs are aluminum framed with a plastic face. The sign face material should be an opaque plexiglass to minimize glare. Sig_ Proportions: The proportions are allowable. Consent: The owner of the property signed the design review application. Existing Signs Not Conforming: None. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The applicant shall obtain a sign permit pursuant to section Five of the Sign Ordinance of this approval is null and void. 3) The plans shall be revised to indicate that the sign face background material will be opaque. 4) Any change to the Master Signage Plan shall require review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee. 5) This approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. 5) DANIEL AND LEO O'BRIEN JIL, DBA F'ORSET PARK REALTY CORP. AND THE O'BRIEN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP-107 UNIT SUBDWIISON— HINESBURG ROAD. This project consists of a 107 unit planned residential development consisting of 18 buildings and a five (5) lot subdivision, Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive. This project was reviewed for preliminary plat approval on 21 August, 2001 (minutes enclosed). 103 units were approved at preliminary plat. The applicant is now requesting approval for a total of 107 units. 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO April 2, 2002 MEETING This property located between Old Farm Road, Hinesburg Road, and Kennedy Drive lies within the R7, R1 and C. O. Districts. It is bounded on the east by Old Farm Road, on the north by Kennedy Drive, on the west by residences, and on the south by Hinesburg Road. Lot size /Frontage: All proposed lots meet frontage requirements and minimum lot size. Densi : The base maximum density for this development is 104 units (14.98 acres x 7 units/ acre =104 units). The normal maximum is 128 units (18.4 acres x 7 units/ acre = 128 units). The applicant is proposing 107 units. Access/Circulation: The applicant is proposing a City street (60 ft. r.o.w. and 30 ft. pavement) to traverse the development from Hinesburg Road to Kennedy Drive. Also proposed are private streets (24 ft. of pavement) to serve the multi -family dwellings. The private street to be known as "Stonington Circle" has two (2) access points to the new City street. This private street will serve 47 units. The other private street to be known as "Lancaster Lane" has two (2) access points to the new City street, and will serve 60 units. Section 401.1(k)(b)(2) requires that these streets serve no more than 20 units. Section 401.1(k)(b)(3) of the Subdivision Regulations allows the Board to exceed the 20 units when it "determines such a road would improve traffic safety conditions and not adversely affect the public good and welfare of the community". Preliminary plat condition # 10 granted a waiver from this requirement. Bruce Hoar, Director of Public Works is no longer requiring a median on Kennedy Drive at the intersection of this development (letter enclosed). Parking: Parking requirements for lot 91 are 106 spaces and 126 spaces are provided. 47 of these spaces are covered spaces. Parking requirements for lot 92 are 135 spaces and 138 spaces are provided. Of these 138 spaces, 64 are covered spaces contained in four parking garages located under each building. The applicant has supplied a letter requesting a waiver of the recreational vehicle parking requirement (letter enclosed). The covered spaces on lot 41 are adequate to serve as accessible spaces. Lot #2 shows 8 total accessible spaces, meeting the requirement. School Impact: The applicant has submitted correspondence from the South Burlington School District evaluating the potential impact this project will have on the school system. Approximately 51 additional students are expected as a result of this project. The South Burlington Schools Business Manager has stated that the schools have capacity to accept the additional students expected. Utilities: The plans submitted include sewer & water main details as well as details of all proposed storm water facilities and sediment control. A stormwater runoff analysis was included in the preliminary plat application. The applicant in a letter has summarized the results and proposed mediation measures. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed stormwater controls. The homeowners' association documents should note that the 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOAS MEMO April 2, 2002 MEETING association is responsible for the maintenance of the stormwater retention pond on the 15.6 acre parcel. The applicant/developer should be responsible for the maintenance of stormwater retention ponds on lot #2. Conservation/Open Space District: The plans illustrate the Conservation & Open Space District and the wetland buffers. No encroachment is proposed. Height Waiver: A height waiver has been requested for buildings 20 and 39 on lot #2. The applicant to submitted elevations indicating the average pre -construction grade. Building # 20 will be 4.82 feet above the 40 foot maximum height, and building #39 will be 4.69 feet above the maximum. Under Section 25.113 (b) of the zoning regulations, the Board may approve an increase in height for residential structure up to 45 feet if the Board determines that a taller structure: (i) Will utilize topography and will relate to other existing and proposed structures so as to be aesthetically compatible with the neighborhood; (ii) will not detract from scenic views of adjacent properties or public streets and walkways; and (iii) will allow retention of additional green space that will enhance the appearance of the developed property. Under Section 25.113 (d) of the zoning regulations for every foot of additional height above the normal 40 foot maximum for pitched -roof structures... front and rear yard setbacks shall be increased by 1 foot. For taller structures as part of a PRD the Board may waive the requirements of this section as long as the general objectives of the PRD and applicable zoning district are met. Under Section 25.113 (e) A request for approval of a taller structure as provided in (b) above shall include the submittal of plans showing the elevations and the architectural design of the structures, the existing grade, post -construction grade, and height of structures. The applicant should be prepared to address the above criteria. Coverage/Setbacks: The maximum coverages for the Residential Seven District are 20% building coverage, 40% overall coverage. Total building coverage will be 11.9% and overall coverage will be 34.3% for the planned residential development. All setback requirements are not being met. The applicant has requested setback waivers for units #8, 131, 133, 135, 137, 169, and 170 on Stonington Circle and 20 and 39 on Lancaster Lane, which do not meet the 30 foot front yard setback requirement. The applicant should revise the plans to show the setback distances on the plans. Li_ hting; All lights must be downcasting and shielded. The applicant has proposed: 1) 8-V2701 70 watt metal halide lamp, pole mounted street lights, mounted at a height of 13.5 feet to serve the proposed public street. 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO April 2, 2002 MEETING 2) 26-150 watt metal halide lamp, pole mounted lights mounted at a height of 20 feet to serve the private streets. The quantities on sheet L5 are not consistent with what is shown on landscape and lighting sheets L1, and L4. The plans should be revised so the light fixtures numbers reflect what is called out on sheet L5. The locations of all wall mounted light fixtures for the development, and details of the light fixtures including wattage and type (i.e. metal halide, sulfur, etc.) should be submitted prior to issuance of any permits. Traffic: The traffic study submitted by the applicant has been forwarded to the Metropolitan Planning Organization for comment. Staff recommended that the applicant comply with the recommendations of the report: 1) construct left -turn lanes on Hinesburg Road at Magalloway Street to serve the project, and 2) the Kennedy Drive access be configured for right -turn movements only. Landscaping_ The Board at preliminary plat approved the applicant's proposal to plant 2" caliper to 2.5" caliper street trees in place of the required 2.5" to 3" caliper trees and the applicant's proposal to plant these trees every 35 feet in place of the 60 foot minimum requirement. The Board at preliminary plat felt the additional number of trees planted would offset the slight reduction in the size of the trees. The minimum landscaping requirement for Lot #1 is $48,000 and Lot #2 is $31,460 and these are being met. Staff suggests that three separate landscape bonds be issued, one for the street trees one for lot #1, and one for lot #2. The street tree value is $64,520. The plans should be revised to include the city arborist's comments regarding the species selection. Impact Fees: The applicant was made aware at preliminary plat that all impact fees will be applicable to the proposed new residences. Dumpsters: No dumpsters proposed. Proposed Park: The City is working with the applicant to acquire lot #3 to retain the land as open space. Recreation Path: The applicant is proposing a recreation path along the collector road connecting Kennedy Drive with Hinesburg Road. The Recreation Path Committee will review the plans at their meeting on April I". Comments will be available at the meeting. Official Map: The Official Map shows a proposed City street connecting Old Farm Road and Hinesburg Road. This road should be shown on the final plat plans. 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO April 2, 2002 MEETING Other: a) E9I I street addresses have been established. b) Signage for the PRD is not part of this application. c) The three different street names should be changed to a single street name. d) The homeowners document should include language that the garages will not be turned into living spaces. e) The plan should be revised to indicate the size of the dwelling units. f) The remaining two lots should be numbered lot#4 and #5. 6) FLETCHER A. DOWNING —CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION-133 WESTVIEW DRIVE This project consists of: 1) a request for conditional use approval to apply the R2 zoning criteria to a portion of 133 Westview Drive, and 2) to apply the R1 zoning criteria to a portion of 99 Westview Drive. This plan was last reviewed on 2/19/02 (minutes enclosed). This project at 99 and 133 Westview Drive lies within the R1 and R2 Districts. It is bounded on the north, south, and west by single family dwellings and on the east by Spear Street. The proposed project complies with the stated purpose of the Residential 2 District "To encourage lower moderate -density residential use" and Residential 1 "To encourage low - density single-family residential use... in order to protect scenic views and cultural resources" and does not adversely affect: a) the capacity of existing or planned community facilities - no effect expected b) the character of the area affected - no adverse effect is expected c) traffic on roads or highways in the vicinity —the proposed use is not expected to affect traffic. d) bylaws in effect- the proposal is in conformance with the zoning regulations e) utilization of renewable energy resources- there is no utilization of renewable energy resources to be affected. f) general public health and welfare - no adverse effect expected. 7) FLETCHER A. DOWNING —BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT-133 WESTVIEW DRIVE This project consists of a boundary line adjustment between 99 Westview Drive and 133 Westview Drive. Final plat was approved on February 19, 2002 (minutes enclosed). This project at 99 and 133 Westview Drive lies within the R1 and R2 Districts. It is bounded on the north, south, and west by single family dwellings and on the east by Spear Street. The only issue affecting this application is lot size. ME "ORANDIUM a C�tt.' alter ir� m TO: Chuck Hafter, FROM: Raymond J. Bela inistrative Officer RE: Reducing Speed Limit on Hinesburg Road DATE: April 23, zooz The Development Review Board at their 4/16/o2 meeting asked that I contact you with regards to requesting the State to reduce the speed limit on a portion of Hinesburg Road. The Board is in the process of reviewing a 107 unit planned residential development with a new City street intersecting with Hinesburg Road directly across from Hayes Avenue. The concern was express that without a traffic signal at this intersection, it would be difficult for pedestrians to cross Hinesburg Road. The Board has asked that the City request the State to reduce the speed limit in this area to make it safer for pedestrians to cross the street. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 AUGUST 2001 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 21 August 2001, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; E. Schmidtt, M. Boucher, R. Farley, L. Kupferman, J. Cameron Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; E. Briggs, M. Buscher, J. Carriere, B. Marcellino, J. Hausner, P. O'Brien, S. Homsted, M. Burke, D. Whitmore, R. Schmucker, T. Crapo, T. Palme, G. Lothrop, M. VonOhlsen, P. Lilienthal, S. Deacon, M. Goranin, C. Barnard, G. Stevenson, M. Swanson, P. Landed, C. & W. Hooper, J. & M. Masrceau, S. & A. Voldman, A. Frank, D. McGuin, L. Llewellyn, J. Ponsetto, V. Fraser, B. Brakeley, J. Dowling, T. Scott, P. O'Leary, P. Doremus, M. Kane, J. Hogan, B. Gardner, C. Douglas, A. Emery, M. Gravelin, E. Farrell, J. Larkin, R. Kay, L. Yankowski, L. Bresee 1. Other Business No issues were raised. 2. Report on recent site plan decisions issued by the Director of Planning & Zoning: a. Site plan application #SP-01-56 of South Burlington School District to amend a previously approved site plan for two schools totaling 167,000 sq. ft. The amend- ment consists of: 1) adding eleven parking spaces, and 2) minor circulation alterations, 550 Dorset St. Approved. b. Site Plan application #SP-01-51 of the Humane Society of Chittenden County to amend a previously approved site plan for a 10,704 sq. ft. building for kennel use. The amendment consists of: 1) reducing the size of the structure from 10,740 sq. ft. To 10,250 sq. ft., 2) adding a cement walk, and 3) adding a gravel exercise area, 633 Queen City Park Road. Approved. c. Site plan application #SP-01-48 of the City of Burlington to amend a previously approved site plan for an 110,565 sq. ft. airport terminal. The amendment consists of: 1) adding a 347 sq. ft. elevator tower to the terminal structure, 2) adding a 918.5 sq. ft. covered walkway to the terminal structure, and 3) expanding the north end aircraft ramp, 1200 Airport Drive. Approved. No issues were raised. 3. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat application #SD-01-34 of Daniel & Leo O'Brien, DBA Forest Park Realty Corp. and The O'Brien Family Limited Partnership for a 101 unit planned residential development and a six lot subdivision, Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive: Mr. Belair distributed a memo from David Roberts, Transportation Planner of the MPO regarding their review of the O'Brien's Traffic Impact Study. Mr. Dinklage noted that the Board has received a letter from the President of the Wellesley Grove Owner's Association. He indicated that their concerns will be addressed by the Board. Mr. O'Brien said they have made a minor change to move the proposed town park closer to Hinesburg Road and increase it in size by an acre. This will enhance the aesthetics. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 AUGUST 2001 PAGE 2 The O'Brien's have joined forces with Homestead Design. Homestead will develop the condo part of the project, and O'Brien's will build the single family homes. Mr. O'Brien said he felt Homestead had come up with a better plan for the condos. There have been some changes in parking, specifically some spaces near Wellesley Grove. These have been made parallel so they don't point toward Wellesley Grove. 122 parking spaces are required (including 5 handicapped spaces). With the proposal, 136 spaces are planned. The city has indicated it will leave the park grassed for the time being and decide what to do with it later. Mr. Dinklage indicated the Board will need to hear from the Council as to what they want for a park. Regarding storm water; Mr. O'Brien indicated that they are proposing a berm to keep water from going into Wellesley Grove. The maximum density allowed is 111. This plan calls for 103, 2 more than previously planned. A 5 ft. height waiver is being asked for on Lancaster Lane. They are also asking for a 15 ft. setback waiver for 3 buildings on Lancaster Lane. Mr. O'Brien said that prior to final plat they will submit specifics on exactly what will be built. The Fire Chief has asked that the condos be sprinklered. Mr. O'Brien said no one else is doing this. The cost would be $4000 per unit, about $200,000 for the project. Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to work with the Fire Chief on this. The Board felt it would not be insistent on sprinklers. Mr. Hausner said they changed the layout of the condos because they didn't like having people enter and see the backs of homes. This plan has them entering and seeing the house fronts and nice landscaping. There were also some units too close together, so units were redistributed and given private backyard areas. There will be 3 types of units ranging from about $150,000 to $200,000. Mr. Hausner then showed the areas where waivers are being asked for. Mr. Dinklage raised the issue of keeping future homeowners out of the CO areas. He noted there are some units that have decks that back right to the edge of the CO area. No mowing or planting of gardens is allowed in the CO district, and Mr. Dinklage felt that some homeowners won't be happy with wild brush right up to their decks. He felt the developers were setting themselves up for problems. A member of the audience suggested planting hedges right along the border. Mr. Dinklage said the smart thing to do is to clearly delineate the CO zone. This will be incorporated into legal documents. Ms. Barnett noted that their development is now dealing with problems because the decks are so close to the wetland buffer. She said erosion has become a major problem. Mr. Dinklage asked staff and the developer to look into this. Ms. Voldman asked about the park near Kennedy Dr. Mr. O'Brien said they are currently proposing 2 parks. One would go to the city. The other would be 1.9 acres with access from the bike path and a 20 ft. easement. The natural area would be left alone (this is lot #4). DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 AUGUST 2001 PAGE 3 Mr. Bolton raised a safety issue with the Hinesburg Rd. park. He said cars come down the road at 50 mph, and could endanger a child leaving the park. There is no sidewalk and no crosswalk for access. Mr. Kay noted that Hinesburg Rd. is a state road and the state should be contacted. Mr. Dinklage asked Mr. Belair to ask the Recreation Dept., Planning Commission and City Council how they want to use this park. Mr. Dinklage noted there are 3 recommendations from the MPO concerning traffic: 1) a left turn lane on Hinesburg Rd., 2) a median on Kennedy Drive, 3) the Kennedy Dr. Access configures for right turn movements only. Ms. Carrier said they have no problem with 1 & 3. The developer is working with the Kennedy Drive improvements people on the median. Ms. Bolton asked about noise from construction. Mr. O'Brien estimated a 2-1/2 to 3 year buildout. Mr. Frank cited the large number of traffic accidents at Hayes Ave. Ms. Carrier said they estimate only 3% of traffic would use that exit. Mr. Frank said if 97% of traffic is turning right, it will be adding to an already clogged intersection. Mr. Kupferman said he didn't think the Board was at a point to understand traffic and drainage because it doesn't know the buildout for the rest of the land. Mr. O'Brien noted the change of the road from 22 ft. to 24 ft. They have also agreed to have a variety of species of trees. Mr. Dinklage noted that Wellesley Grove was concerned that 45 ft. between trees was too close. The landscaper felt that 60 ft. was too much. Mr. Belair noted that 2 to 2-1/2 inch caliper trees are indicated and the city standard is 2-1/2 to 3 inch. Ms. Stevens asked about drainage. Mr. O'Brien said there will be no storm water from the pavement going into the wetland. There will, however, be water from the roofs going into the wetland. The question of melting snow going into the wetlands was also raised with a concern for bringing oil and other contaminants. Mr. O'Brien said water will not go directly to the wetlands but will be checked in a holding pond first, and that will filter out some contaminants. The pond will require fencing. Ms. Yankowski felt that in a heavy rainfall the ground would not be able to absorb the water and it would flow into the wetland. Mr. O'Brien said they are asking for a 5 ft. height waiver on the two buildings that have underground parking. Mr. Cameron said he was concerned about the setback distances from the CO area. He felt the builders will have to go into the zone to get foundations in, etc. He also asked if there is a way to phase the project to coordinate with the rebuilding of Kennedy Drive. Mr. O'Brien said he would rather submit a traffic analysis without Kennedy Dr. improvements. He was afraid of tying the project to the road project. Mr. Dinklage asked whether 125 parking spaces for Lancaster Lane is adequate. Mr. O'Brien said historically they don't have problems. He said the units on lot 2 will all be rentals. Mr. Dinklage asked them to consider more parking. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 AUGUST 2001 PAGE 4 A member of the audience raised issues about the woods to be cut down and felt there should be identification of endangered species. Mr. Kupferman said that would be addressed at Act 60. He added that since this property has the luxury of having property that could be added to this property to meet the setbacks, he would like to see setbacks met. Mr_ Belair said he felt the front yard setbacks are being met. Mr. Dinklage asked whether the additional setbacks to allow for the height waiver are being met. Mr. Belair said they should be 35 ft. from the road. The applicant said they are. Mr. Schmidtt moved that the Board approve the Preliminary Plat application #SD-01-34 of Daniel & Leo O'Brien, DBA Forest Park Realty Corp. and The O'Brien Family Limited Partnership subject to the stipulations in the draft motion of 21 August 2001. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed 4-1 with Mr. Kupferman voting against and Mr. Cameron abstaining. 4. Sketch plan application #SD-01-44 of John Larkin for a planned residential development consisting of: 1) the transfer of density from 44.82 acres of adjoining land to a 59.95 acre parcel, and 2) subdividing a 59.95 acre parcel into 52 single family lots and 72 multi -family units in 25 buildings, 1539 & 1545 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Llewellyn showed the original sketch plan including the proposed extension of Old Cross Road to Hinesburg Rd. north of Van Sicklen. He indicated that since this was presented, things have changed. The Ledoux property has become available, and the developer is proposing to acquire this and straighten the intersection at Van Sicklen. They will also complete the connection to Butler Farms but will not construction the connection to Dorset St. They have also added 6 units. Mr. Dinklage asked about a possible connection to the Chittenden property. Mr. Llewellyn said there is an opening, but they can't make the connection now because they don=t control the lower half of the property. Mr. Dinklage said they can carve this up any way they want as the family controls all the property. Mr. Boucher noted that if future zoning changes, the family will be able to build on the lower half as they do control the property. Mr. Dinklage said he wouldn't approve the project without an easement for a connection to the Chittenden property. All other members agreed. Ms. Fraser asked that the remaining open acreage be deeded open space no matter what happens. She noted that Mr. Milot had said he was willing to do this with his land. Mrs. Marceau, who will remain as owner of the parcel from which the density is being moved, said her husband wants to leave the homestead untouched as long as he lives. His now 89 years old. Mr. Dinklage said that showing an easement wouldn't mean anything is done to the land at this time. It only says that when the Chittenden property is developed, the city could require a road to be built. Mr. Bresee suggested an easement that says nothing can be done for a specific length of time. Mr. Belair noted that staff is asking that the number of curb cuts on the Ledoux property be reduced from 6 to 1. Mr. Whitmore requested buffer zones to Dorset Heights so houses are not up against their property. He was also concerned with drainage. Some people have private wells, and they are worried about contamination. Mr. Llewellyn said Heindel & Noyes has indicated there would be no impact to the wells. Mr. Belair said that isn't what Heindel & Noyes said: they indicated that if Old Cross Road is not extended the risk is reduced. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 28, zooz Daniel & Leo O'Brien, Jr. DBA Forest Park Realty Corp. PO Box 2184 S. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Hinesburg Road & Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. O'Brien: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and my comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, April Z, zooz at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. Sincer ly, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl./td i-UBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Deveioomi:m R­,!ew Board will hold it public nearing at the Soum Bur- iington City Hail, Confer- ence Room, 575 Dorset Street, Sopth Burlington. Vermont on Tuesday, April 2, 2002. at 7:30 P.M. to consider the fol- lowing: 1. Application #CU-02-05 of Fletcher A. Downing for conditional use ap- pproval under Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Re - to: 1) is applyrtheermision R2sDis- trict zoning criteria to a portion of 133 Westview Drive, and 2) apply . the R1 District zoning criteria to a portion of 99 West - view Drive. 2. Final plat application #SD-02.17 of Fletcher A.. Downing for a boundary line adjustment between — 99 Westview Drive and 133 Westview Drive. 3.Final plat application #SD-02-18 of Daniel and Leo O'Brien Jr., DBA Fo- rest Perk Realty Corp. and The O'Brien Family Limited Partnership for a 107 unit planned residen- tial development consist- ing of 18 buildings and a five (5) lot subdivision. Hinesburg Road. and Kennedy Drive. 4. Application #CU-02.04 of Nextel WIP Lease Corp. DBA Nextel Partn- ers for conditional use appproval under Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Re- quest is for permission to install 12-48 in. high antennas within a pro- l posed cupola on the roof top,1776 Williston Road. 5. Final plat application #SD-02.14 of Sumner Ice Joint Venture to amend a previsouty ap- Med 12 lot subdivision amendment cons- ists of amending previously approved berm at the south end of the property. to avoid wetland impacts, Hines- burg Road. 6. Application #CU-02-03 of Champlain Water..Dis- trict seeking conditional use appproval under Sec- tion 26.05, Conditional Uses, of the South Bur- lington Zoning Regula- tions. Request is for permission to construct 1) 24,000 sq. ft. of free- ze-dry beds, 2) a 235 sq. ft. control building, and 3) a 1500 gallon capacity underground pump sta- tion, 403 Queen City Park Road. Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. Jonn Dinklage South Burlington Development Review Board March 16, 2002 CITY OF SOUTH BURLING` ON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BliRLINGTON, VER.MONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 28, zooz Littleton Long Trust 1720 Spear Street S. Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106 or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl./td KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc, March 8, 2002 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: O'Brien Home Farm SC-01-34 Dear Ray, 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 Fax (802) 878-9618 RECEIVED MAR 112002 City Of so. Bu; 1 =y , We are submitting a Final Plat and Site Plan applications for Stonington Circle and Lancaster Lane clusters of the O'Brien Home Farm development. During Final Plat development, there has been minor revisions to the plans. We would like to go item by item through the Preliminary Plat findings of fact and decision and respond to items which relate to the minor revisions. Findings of Fact and Decision 1) The Preliminary Plat approval contained 103 units configured as a PRD. The Final Plat submittal shows 107 units configured as a PRD. The increase in units occurs in the Lancaster Lane multifamily cluster. 2) No change. 3) No change. 4) No change. 5) The Preliminary Plat approval references a base maximum density of 106 units and the normal maximum density of 130 units. The lot configuration shown in the Final Plat application has a base maximum density of 105 units and a normal maximum density of 126 because the combined areas of the lots dropped by .22 acres when the final lot calculations were made. 6) The Preliminary Plat approval references Stonington Circle and Lancaster Lane as private streets serving 47 and 56 units respectively. Ray Belair March 8, 2002 Page Two The Final Plat application shows Stonington Circle as a private street serving 47 units and Lancaster Lane as a private street serving 60 units. 7) No change. 8) No change. 9) No change in utilities. The Final Plat application shows water, stormwater and wastewater in greater detail. 10) No change. 11) The Preliminary Plat approval references Lot 1 building coverage to be 16.3% and total lot coverage to be 31.9%. Lot 2 building coverage was referenced to be 17.2% and total coverage 39.1%. Lot 3 was referenced to have building coverage of 0% and total coverage of 3.4%. The Final Plat submittal shows Lot 1 building coverage to be 17.1 % and total lot coverage to be 32.1%. Lot 2 building coverage shows 14.5% building coverage an 37% total lot coverage. 12) No change. 13) No change. 14) Additional traffic plans and studies have been submitted as part of the Final Plat application. 15) Additional landscaping and planting information is being submitted with the Final Plat application. 16) The applicant acknowledges impact fees. 17) No change. 18) The Preliminary Plat approval references 106 parking spaces for lot 1 and 126 parking spaces for lot 2. The Final Plat application provides 106 parking spaces for lot 1 and 138 parking spaces for lot 2. Of the 106 parking spaces provided for lot 1, 47 are covered in garages. Of the 138 parking spaces provided for lot 2, 64 are covered in four, 16 car parking garages, located under each unit. Ray Belair March 8, 2002 Page Three 19) The Preliminary Plat explored the option of providing a "pocket park" and park land on lot 3. Subsequent analysis of the feasibility of three parks has resulted in the parks being deleted from the Final Plat submittal. Lot 3 is designated as open space. 20) No change. 21) No change. 22) The Final Plat application includes 911 addresses. Final Plat Decision and Conditions 1) No comment. 2) No comment. 3) No comment. 4) No comment. 5a) The Hayes Avenue street name has been changed to Magalloway Street, Hillsborough Drive and Eldredge Street. 5b) The site is not in a flood plain and there is no mapped flood elevation. 5c) Bike racks are included in the plans. 5d) The Final Plat has been revised to show 8 handicapped spaces (4 covered) in the Lancaster Lane multifamily units. The driveway and the garage for each of the Stonington Circle townhouse units are adequate to serve as handicapped parking spaces. 5e) The Final Plat submittal for the Lancaster Lane multifamily units has been revised to show 16 units of covered parking per building. The Stonington Circle townhouse units show a covered parking space in the garage for each unit. 5f) Architectural plans will be submitted as part of the Final Plat plans showing the height and size of the buildings from pre construction grade. 5g) Mailbox clusters will be located out of the public right-of-way. 5h) The Applicant has included the recommendations of the City Arborist in the Final Plat application. Ray Belair March 8, 2002 Page Four 5i) The Final Plat plans have been revised to show footing drains for all units with basements. 5j) The Final Plat includes 911 address for the development. 6) No comment. 7) The Lancaster Lane multifamily units will be sprinklred. The Applicant is working with the South Burlington Fire Department to determine the status of sprinklers for the Stonington Circle multifamily units. 8) There are no structures in the PRD setback area. 9) The Applicant acknowledges the developers/homeowners association will be responsible for the maintenance of the retention basins. 10) The Applicant acknowledges item 10. 11) The Final Plat submittal shows the same units of Stonington Circle in the front yard setback as the Preliminary Plat plans. The unit numbers have changed in the Final Plat application due to 911 addressing. Units 8, 170, 169, 139, 137, 135, 133 and 131 extend into the front yard setback. There has been a reevaluation of units in the 30 foot front yard setback in the Lancaster Lane cluster. The only unit in the setback is building 20. 12) The Final Plat submittal includes lighting type and wattage for exterior lighting. 13) Since the Preliminary Plat approval, the designers have questioned the need for a median at the Kennedy Drive intersection. The Applicant is not sure how this issue was resolved. 14) The Final Plat application shows the multifamily Lancaster Lane cluster to have parking increased from 125 spaces to 138 spaces. Of this total there are 60 standard covered spaces, 4 handicapped covered spaces, 70 uncovered standard spaces and 4 handicapped uncovered spaces. 15) The homeowners association documents include a provision prohibiting the conversion of garage spaces to living spaces. 16) The Preliminary Plat was approved 8/27/01. The Final Plat application will be made on 3/8/02. Rau Belair March 8, 2002 Page Five 17) The Final Plat application includes architectural plans for the buildings of the Lancaster Lane cluster. The Applicant is requesting an increase in building height to 45 for buildings 20, 39, 40 and 60 because each building now includes an underground parking garage. We hope this information will assist you in evaluating the Final Plat application for the O'Brien Home Farm. Please feel free to call if you have any questions or comments regarding the application.. Very truly yours, Michael J. Burke, P.E. MJB/dcw enclosure cc: Pat O'Brien 00I82:belair navatl I= MEMORANDIUM TO: Bruce ON reation Director FROM: Raymond J. air, Administrative Officer RE Developmen Review Projects for Recreation Path Committee Review DATE: March zs, zooz The following projects will be reviewed by the DRB which involve recreation paths. Please review these projects with the Recreation Path Committee. O'Brien io7 Unit PRD On 4/z/oz the Development Review Board will hold a public hearing to review the final plat for this project. Pizzagalli Subdivision On 4/i6/o2 the Development Review Board will hold a public hearing to review the final plat for the two (z) lot subdivision and new public street project. Homestead Design 89 Unit PRD On 4/16/oz the Development Review Board will review another sketch proposal for this multi -family development. -"/, Z- C) C ANe-4sTE2 G A/v`G, 4y.91 3S2.4z q�,a z- F, F so R F E 33F q�na)mgj(q LgUmmimpp a(m)Q CNO@naam m0g)N9 @Od(p 1mO(Pe&gBoUD C3 CD o Qi C@Gi] IBIT(D Gm 5Qq)(p1mgwg OaDg. MG ui m @uKpnCnK@P Lr`Oi aiOOQ° Md. I consumng P. 0. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407 www.obiienbrothersagency.corn 27 Warren Street Concord, NH 03301, (603) 225-0CAO wwrw.sghlW.cum dui/ , epwelle, Ask4r,.1 Ter CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Planning Commission. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) Daniel and Leo O'Brien Jr. DBA Forest Park Realty Corp. and The O'Brien Family Limited Partnership P.O. Box 2184, South Burlington, Vermont 05407 phone 658-5000, (fax) 658 5002 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Same as Owner 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Patrick O'Brien, The O'Brien Brothers Agency, P.O. Box 2184, South Burlington, Vermont 05407 phone 658-5000, (fax) 658-5002 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS Lot 1 fronts Hinesburg Road & proposed Magalloway Street; Lot 2 fronts Kennedy Drive and proposed Eldredge Street 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 29-1-2 & 29-1-10 (Map 42, Section 4) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) The existing property is woodland and grassland. The grassland is brush hogged. b) Proposed Uses (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) 47 townhouse style condominium units and related site work are proposed on Lot 1. 60 multi -family condominium units in 4 buildings and related site work are proposed for Lot 2. Lot 3 is proposed as open land. The right o ways for Magalloway Street, Hillsborough Avenue and Eldredge Street are proposed to be dedicated to the City of South Burlington. c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) There are no buildings presently on the property. Lot 1 is proposed to have 60,400 s.f. of total building coverage. Lot 2 is proposed to have 50,000 s.f. of total building coverage. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) There will be three separate townhouse elevations: 1) two story with a basement walkout; 2) two story on slab; 31 basement entrygarage with two stories above. The multi -family residential units will be four, three story, 15-plex's, with underground parking. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) 47 townhouses and 60 multi -family residential units in 4 buildings. f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) Not applicable g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) As part of the preliminary plat approval, the Applicant believes he has received the following waiver of subdivision /zoning regulations: 1. Building separation reduced to 10 feet with the appropriate design of the building walls to meet applicable fire codes. (Section 405, Subdivision Regulations) 2. A reduction in the front yard building setback from 30 to 15 feet. 3. To adopt the typical road cross section shown on sheet 11 of Krebs & Lansing plans. No change to required Subbase infrastructure is proposed. (Exhibit H, Subdivision Regulations) 4. The Applicant requests an increase in allowable height for the multi -family units to 45 feet maximum and to waive the increase in setbacks prescribed for buildings taller than 40 feet. (Section 25.113(d) of Zoning Regulations)- 5. To waive the private circulation road width of 24 feet to allow a 22 foot width on Lot 2 in the multi -family development. (Section 401 (J) & (Kj Subdivision Regulations) 6. To allow more than 20 units to be served by a private road on Lots 1 and 2. (Section 401 (J) & (K) Subdivision Regulations) 7) LOT COVERAGE (All land involved in the development) a) Building: Existing 0 % Proposed 12.0 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 % Proposed 34.3 % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 0 % Proposed 6.5 % 8) COST ESTIMATES LOT 1 LOT 2 a) Building (including interior renovations) $ 4,050,000. $ 2,666,000. LOT 1 LOT 2 b) Landscaping: $ 40,170. See Landscaping Narrative from T.J. Boyle & Associates, Landscape Architect c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) Lot 1 site work, roads, parking, - sidewalk $150,000. Lot 2 roads, parking sidewalks $87 500. Construct approximately 2,000 LF of road to City of South Burlington Standards including infrastructure, bike path and landscaping $300,000. E 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) See traffic report b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) Prepared by Roger Dickinson, P.E. c) P.M. peak hour for entire property (in and out) Lamoureux and Dickinson Consulting Engineers 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION Not applicable 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Not applicable 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE The Applicants would like to start work on Lots 1 and 2 and the municipal road as soon as permits are issued. The estimated duration of activities is 3 years. 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE $50.00 A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Planning Commission ❑ City Planner have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete City Planner or Designee Date 3 Carol Barnard 630 Hinesburg Road #20 South Burlington, VT 05403 November 6, 2001 Mr. Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Realty P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Patrick, We were optimistic that a mutually acceptable agreement could have been reached by this time. Instead, we find that our concerns are deepening, and our last meeting with John Hausner was disappointing. He offered us "a few more feet, to angle a building ever so slightly, and to shift a couple of them." These concessions were due to Juli Beth Hoovers' willingness to grant a setback waiver. We have asked for very little and you have acknowledged this; however, you have not been willing to accommodate us. Perhaps a plan to use the park acreage as a natural buffer between developments would be an acceptable proposal. We previously expressed reservations about such a plan. Since then the acreage has increased, and it would now be possible to design a park in such a way that it would protect the existing environmentally sensitive CO district and wetlands, offer access to a beautiful wooded setting with many old trees, a treasure by itself in today's urban and polluted setting. A footpath could provide access to this park. The homes in your development would benefit from this natural setting, and berms as well as creative landscaping could protect your development from Hinesburg Road. We hope that you will give this proposal serious consideration. We are looking forward to your reply. Sincerely. Carol Barnard President, WGCA cc: HDI STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Vermont Agency of Natural Resources will hold a public hearing, in accordance with 10 V.S.A. 1263(b) on its tentative determination to issue a discharge permit for an application filed by: Daniel and Leo O'Brien, Jr. Forest Park Realty Corp. P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05403 The Agency of Natural Resources proposes to issue a discharge permit (#1-1520) to the above named applicant for the discharge of treated and controlled stormwater from building roofs and roadways of the proposed O'Brien Home Farm residential subdivision located off of Route 116, and Kennedy Drive, in South Burlington, Vermont to tributaries of Potash Brook. The Agency will accept comments on all relevant issues pertaining to this discharge permit. A public hearing will be held on February 27, 2002 at 6:00 PM at the South Burlington High School, Room 108-109, 550 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT to receive public comments on the draft permit. Any person may submit oral or written comments at the public hearing. In making a final determination on the application, the Agency will consider all information received by that date or presented at the hearing. The application and draft discharge permit are on file and may be inspected at the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Stormwater Management Section, Building 10 North, 103 South Nlain Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408. Copies of this information are available at cost and may be obtained by written request or by calling (802) 241-3770. January 21, 2002 Ov � A,v 4-1--� ga,,4 4,�� ze)o ,,—, l9t-�. A a Z�;- 1(,.25 � . c-,5 iq 1?.s-0 a, A CSG lb � 2,5--�w Gov. CS D 23► L3 �`l� i Z-6 ;�v � D-o iSSA � F lz z2z 0 2 2. oo &8z vcs 3 4(. 'S�D t2A ��I,c� 4- ss-� i. v 40 20 20 0 UD 1 cQ o n �e5D 3 �S- 0- f� G SO To: Applicants From: Stephanie Smith, City of South Burlington RE: Project Staff Notes Date: March 18, 2001 Re: Final plat application #SD-02-18 of Leo and Daniel O'Brien, DBA Forest Park Realty Corp. and the O'Brien Family Limited Partnership. Overview: Final plat application #SD-02-18 of Daniel and Leo O'Brien Jr., DBA Forest Park Realty Corp. and the O'Brien Family Limited Partnership for a 107 unit planned residential development and a six (6) lot subdivision, Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive. Issues: ■ The applicant has not submitted the required elevations drawings. These must be submitted as soon as possible. ■ Where setback waivers are granted, please indicate these distances on the plans. This is so there is no confusion with the setback distances. ■ Staff is unable to find the bike racks and grouped mailboxes on any of the plans. If they are shown please let us know which page they are located on. • Page 2 of the plans shows the zoning district boundary line separating R7 and R1. RI is incorrectly labeled as R4. This should be changed on page 2 and anywhere else in the plans where it may be incorrect. • A street lighting plan should be submitted with this application. ■ Staff is concerned that there are three street names for one continuous street (Magalloway, Eldredge and Hillsborough). This should be explained at the hearing. ■ The applicant should be aware that signage is not part of this review by the DRB. ■ The multi -family development requires recreational vehicle parking per section 26.253 (c) of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. These spaces should be indicated on the plan. Completeness of Plan: The applicant has submitted sufficient information for Development Review Board to consider the application with the above exceptions noted. Please provide additional information by March 26, 2002. Recommendation: Staff recommends this application be authorized to proceed for final plat consideration at the April 2, 2002 meeting. 575 Dorset Street Phone: 846-4106 Fax: 846-4101 Fax To: Pat O'Brien From: Stephanie A. Smith Fax: 658-5002 Date: March 18, 2002 Phone: Pages: 3 Re: Home Farm CC: Re: Final Plat application for the Home Farm development Dear Mr. O'Brien: Please find attached the preliminary comments on the above referenced application. The project is currently scheduled to be considered by the Development Review Board on April 2, 2002. If you wish to respond to these comments or submit additional information, please do so no later than March 26, 2002. Please be sure that someone is at this meeting to represent your application. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Stephanie A. Smith Associate Planner City of South Burlington, Planning & Zoning 1 CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS FOR 4/2/2002 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING 1) O'BRIEN HOME FARM-HINESBURG AND KENNEDY a. UNDERGROUND POWER, TELEPHONE AND T. V. LINES SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE OF THE STREET R.O.W. b. A PLAN OF THE GAS MAIN SHALL BE FURNISHED FOR REVIEW. IT SHALL BE PLACED ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE STREET FROM THE WATERMAIN. C. A STREET LIGHTING PLAN SHALL BE FURNISHED. d. THE DEVELOPER SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL TRAFFIC SIGNS. 2) CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT —QUEEN CITY PARK ROAD a. THE SITE PLAN FOR THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT BACK WASH TREATMENT FACILITY PREPARDED BY THE TIGHE AND BOND CONSULTING ENGINEERS DATED 2/4/02 ARE ACCEPTABLE. 3) NEXTEL PARTNERS AND SANEL AUTO PARTS—WILLISTON ROAD a. PLAN SHOULD HAVE DIMENSIONS, LOT AND BUILDING b. PARKING SPACES SHOULD BE SHOWN C. WATER AND SEWER SERVICES SHOULD BE SHOWN 4) SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 March 15, 2002 Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 RE: O'Brien Home Farm South Burlington 'The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. Sheet 3: The water line on Stonington Circle that supplies units #129-141 only requires one gate valve at the 8" and 4" tee location. An eight -inch (8") valve can be installed then the line can be reduced to four -inch. By doing so only a four - inch tee would be required. Alternatively, the line could be reduced to 4" after the hydrant, a 4"valve installed, then a 4"tee for that loop. This tee shall not require three valves. 2. Sheet 3: An eight -inch (8") valve shall be installed on the 8" water line, approximately midway between units #55 and #89 on Stonington Circle. 3. Sheet 3: Another eight -inch gate valve shall be installed on the east side of the tee east of unit #119. 4. Eight -inch water pipe shall have no less than three (3) brass wedges installed at each joint. 5. Sheet 3: At the corner of Hillsborough Drive and Eldredge Street, at the end of the bike path, a twelve -inch (12") water stub and end cap is shown. Please notify this department of any future plans that may require this 12" stub. Another 12" valve shall be installed at this intersecting tee. Additionally, another 8" valve shall be installed on the 8" line on Hillsborough Drive, on the south side of that tee. 6. All hydrants shall meet the City specifications, and a hydrant flag shall be supplied with each hydrant. Hydrant drains shall have all drains plugged prior to installation. 7. Sheet 5: The six-inch (6") gate valves to each of the multi -family units on Lancaster Lane shall be connected to 8"x8"x6" anchor tees. The six-inch valves shall not be in -line valves as they are currently shown. 8. Sheet 5: Please notify this department of any future plans that may require the need for the six-inch stub in front of building 40 on Lancaster Lane. This seems like an unnecessary line and should be removed unless it is being included for future growth. 9. Sheet 5: The six-inch water line that will be supplying buildings 20,39,and 60 on Lancaster Lane shall have anchor tees and valves installed off from the 8" line, not in -line valves as shown. 10. Sheet 5: The hydrant located on the line from Georgetown shall have a valve installed at the bend. 11. Permission to tap the Georgetown water line must be obtained from the owner, as that is not a City owned water line. 12. A short section of copper tubing and temporary plug shall be installed at the end of each curb stop. This section shall be removed when the line is extended into the house, thereby keeping the number of joints between the curb stop and house to a minimum. 13. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances and water line crossings. 14. Details shall be modified to be those from the above referenced specifications. Specifically, concrete shall not be poured under any gate valves. Instead the valves shall be encased in crushed stone, per the specifications. Also, the gate valves shall be resilient wedge, not double disc construction as indicated. I have enclosed copies of our details for your use. 15. Further changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. This department shall be notified of any changes to this project with revised, updated hard copy plans sent directly to us for further review. Failure to comply with this requirement may cause the project to be delayed. 16. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. 17. The hydrants and water lines located on Stonington Circle and Lancaster lane shall be considered private and subject to all associated fees and charges, as they are on private roads. At this time the City of South Burlington charges all private hydrant owners $100 annually for each private fire hydrant. The SBWD shall continue to carry on its practice of overseeing the repair and maintenance of all water mains and appurtenances outside the City ROW. Work performed outside the ROW shall be charged to the owners of the project for time and materials when associated with any maintenance, outside of routine, and repairs. 18. For one year from the date the new system is placed into service, the applicant, or developer shall be responsible for any necessary repairs or corrections. At the end of a one-year period, this department will perform an inspection. The applicant shall correct any punch list items accumulated during this inspection after the receipt of this list. Incomplete work on the system shall not be included in the initial inspection, but shall be inspected as the project continues. Final acceptance, after the one-year warranty period, shall not take place until the As- Builts have been received and all required improvements have been satisfactorily completed. L.2 y State of Vermont / Agency of Transportation National Life Building VTfans T, Drawer 33 Workto 6et You There ¢ Montpelier, VT 05633-5001 March 11, 2002 Scott Homsted, P.E. Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, Vt. 05446 Subject: O'Brien Home Farm VT. Route 116.S. Burlington Dear Scott: The Agency has completed a review of the January 21,2002 O'Brien Home Farm Hydraulics study, which was received on January 24, 2002. The Agency has the following comments: 1) The predevelopment drainage area shown is 18.3 acres, the bulk of which is off the O'Brien Farm. The post development drainage area compromises 32.8 acres. As all site drainage goes to the Potash Brook through drainage structures under South Burlington town highways, Kennedy drive, and Kimble Ave., we suggest the total site be evaluated for pre and post development flow rates regardless of outlet location. 2) The Post 4 drainage Time of Concentration (Tc) should include the Travel Time (Tt) to the study point. The pond outlet Tt to the study area should also be included. (It is not clear that this has been done.) The post 3 Tc is in error. Calculations show 0.44 hours. 3) Foundation Drains are shown direct connected to the pond outlet piping. This will preclude the use of roof gutter connections to downspouts tied to the foundation drains. 4) The pond should be constructed to lengthen the flow path between the inlet(s) and outlet structures to eliminate short circuiting. The outlet structure should be shown, and stage/storage/discharge curves provided. There should be an emergency spillway detailed as part of the detention basin design. Maintenance access needs to be provided to allow periodic cleaning of sediment. 5) At the downstream study point, the 15" drive pipe is to be replaced with a 24" culvert. The ditch and subsequent crossing structures need to be checked for available capacity from here to the point of ultimate discharge at Potash brook. Also, the outlet velocities at the design flow rate are excessive. An energy dissipator will be required to eliminate erosion potential. www.aot.state.vt.us Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont & an Equal Opportunity Employer 1 Once the above information has been developed, we are requesting another submittal be made. It is apparent that the new Town Highway, Hayes Avenue, will leave access points for future additional development. All downstream facilities should be sized to accommodate future growth within the O'Brien Farm property. This question can be addressed in the subsequent submittal. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call me at (802) 828-2487 or by E- mail at pete. Jaye@state. vt. its. Sincerely, /-^ rz A � Pete Daye Project Supervisor Utilities & Permits Unit cc: Town of South Burlington District Environmental Coordinator #4 Daniel & Leo O'Brien,O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc Richard Hosking, District Transportation Administrator #5 State of Vermont / Agency of Transportation i National Life Building rawer 33 Montpelier, VT Tf S Workingto bet you There M 05633-5001 V an March 11, 2002 Daniel & Leo O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407-2184 Subject: O'Brien Home Farm VT. Route 116.S. Burlington Dear Daniel & Leo: The Agency has completed a review of the February 1, 2002 O'Brien Home Farm follow-up traffic study, which we received on February 7, 2002. The Agency also reviewed the traffic analysis portion of a subsequent turn lane design submittal that was dated February 21, 2002. These two submittals were provided by Lamoureux & Dickinson in response to comments the Agency made in a November 5, 2001 memo regarding a review of their original August 8, 2001 O'Brien Home Farm traffic study. The Agency has the following comments: 1) In the original August 8, 2001 traffic study, the consultant stated that the Hinesburg Road / Kennedy Drive intersection would have sufficient capacity to serve the traffic that would be generated by O'Brien Home Farm, once VTrans' Kennedy Drive reconstruction project was complete. This was demonstrated by providing one 2006 full -build capacity analysis using existing geometries, and one using future geometries. The Agency's main concern however, was that although the O'Brien Home Farm project would be phased in, no interim analyses using existing intersection geometries were provided. It appears that the consultant has alleviated this concern by altering the phasing of the Hinesburg Road / Kennedy Drive signal. By including protected plus permitted left -turn phasing for all approaches, adequate levels -of - service were demonstrated through 2006 using existing intersection geometries. 2) The Agency agrees with the updated background volumes used by the consultant in their capacity and turn -lane warrant analyses. Although it appears that two different methods were used to calculate background volumes for the two intersections in the study, both methods provided valid and similar results. 3) As the Agency requested in a previous memo, the capacity analyses in the updated study included permitted development trips from the Technology Park project on Kimball Avenue. Although the correct number of permitted trips were used, it appears that they were applied to www.aot.state.vt.us Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer the wrong intersection approaches. However, this error does not significantly affect the capacity results. 4) The Agency agrees with the consultant's conclusion in their February 1, 2002 submittal that a southbound 75' left -turn lane and a northbound 100' left -turn lane are warranted at the Hinesburg Road / Hayes Avenue intersection. We also agree with the consultant's conclusion in their February 21, 2002 submittal that the existing southbound right -turn lane at the Hinesburg Road / Hayes Avenue intersection is not warranted. Also included in the February 21 submittal are calculations for additional storage for deceleration. We feel that turn lane geometries can be more appropriately reviewed by Traffic Design. In conclusion, the Agency feels that the follow-up submittals provided by the consultant fulfill the requirements put forth in our November 5, 2001 memo. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call me at (802) 828-2487 or by E- mail at pete.daye@state.W.us. Sincerely, 4& 96�� Pete Daye Project Supervisor Utilities & Permits Unit cc: Roger Dickinson, Lamoureux & Dickinson Town of South Burlington District Environmental Coordinator #4 Richard Hosking, District Transportation Administrator #5 South Burlington Street Department 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 TEL: (802) 658-7961 OFFICE 104 LANDFILL RD. 2/7/2002 To: Development Review Board From: Bruce K. Hoar, Director of Public Works Re: O'Brien Home Farm Development With the redesign of Kennedy Drive there is no median in the vicinity of the proposed exit of the O'Brien Home Farm Development on Kennedy Drive. The Kennedy Drive Project is moving right along and we have not, nor do we intend to have a median at this location as part of the project. We have met with the developers in regards to their exit and feel that the island/median that is to be built in the exit of the development should be sufficient to not allow left turn traffic onto or from Kennedy Drive. Therefore it is not necessary for the developer to construct a median on Kennedy as part of their project. MEMO South Burlington Planning & Zoning To: South Burlington DRB Ray Belair From: Juh Beth Hoover, AICP Director of Planning & Z ng RE: Open Space on O'Brien Farm Development Date: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 cc: Bruce O'Neil, Chuck Hafter, Ray Belair Bill Burgess, Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission I would like to bring you all up to date on the actions taken by the Planning Commission and City Council with respect to reserving land on the O'Brien property for potential acquisition by the City. In summary there are three important conclusions from these two boards: 1. The Planning Commission and City Council both support Official Map designation of the 5.75-acre parcel shown on the attached site plan as a potential future City Park. 2. The future City Park to be designated on the Official Map would include "Lot 4" of the proposed subdivision. 3. While at this time the Planning Commission does not endorse reservation of the small open space area along the proposed Hayes Avenue entrance road as future park land on the Official Map, the Planning Commission does not believe that this is an inappropriate location for common open space. The Planning Commission and Recreation Department conducted three site visits to this property to determine the optimal location for a neighborhood park of between five and ten acres, given the many considerations that come into play with a parcel of this size and a development proposal already under review. The 5.75 acre area that incorporates "Lot 4" of the proposed subdivision as well as the large, flat, forested areas along Kennedy Drive offers areas for active and passive recreation and a contrast of natural and more developable areas. With respect to the small open area proposed along the Hayes Avenue entrance drive, the Planning Commission did not recommend reservation of this area at this point for two reasons. First, it was felt that the Recreation Department had not clearly defined the best use for the parcel at this time, as the makeup of the new residents is not yet known. Second, it was felt that the City should not take on the potential for adding to its maintenance load without a clearly defined need for the property. However, the Planning Commission did not recommend against reserving this area as open space as part of the development plan. ►1 Carol Barnard 630 Hinesburg Road, #20 South Burlington, VT 05403 November 6, 2001 Mr. John Dinklage Chair, Development Review Board City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Dinklage and Board Members, We have a suggestion that would resolve some of our concerns and those raised by Board Members at the August 21 Development Review Board Meeting. We understand that Mr. O'Brien will deed approximately four acres to the city for use as a town park, and he has proposed two locations: at the Hinesburg Road/ Hayes Avenue intersection, and near Kennedy Drive. The Hinesburg Road location, however, presents serious safety concerns. Our Proposal involves locating the park acreage between Wellesley Grove and the new development. This would address some of the concerns such as keeping building construction and future homeowners out of the CO district, protecting the wetlands, preserving more forest, and providing more of a buffer between the two developments. The advantages to locating the park in this area include protecting the existing environmentally sensitive CO district and wetlands and offering access to a beautiful wooded setting with many old trees, a treasure by itself in today's urban and polluted setting. A footpath could provide access to this park. The homes in the development would also benefit from this natural setting. Thus, not only would this address environmental, safety, and quality of life issues, it would also set an example as to how the city can protect existing developments and natural areas through creative use of donated land. We previously expressed reservations about Mr. O'Brien's proposal for creating a park in this area because of our concerns about adverse impacts to the wetlands. At that time, Mr. O'Brien's proposal for a park involved a narrow strip of land. Since then, we understand that the acreage for the park has increased, and we believe that a park that is at least four acres in size could be designed in a way to minimize adverse impacts to the Page 1 wetlands yet provide reasonable access to the public and provide an effective buffer area between the developments. For example, in an appropriately shaped park, marked trails could be developed that would encourage people to stay out of the wetlands. We look forward to further discussions about the possibility of designating the area between Wellesley Grove and the O'Brien development as the area for the new park. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Carol Barnard President, WGCA Encl: Letter to O'Brien Brothers Cc: Parks and Recreation Department Planning Commission Director of Planning and Zoning City Council Page 2 Mr. Ray Belair City of South Burlington Office of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Belair, Carol Barnard 630 Hinesburg Rd, #20 South Burlington, VT 05403 20 September 2001 I am writing to you as President of the board of directors of Wellesley Grove Condominium Association and as chair of that association's ad hoc committee on the O'Brien development. We wish to reiterate our interest in the process following the August 21" DRB meeting that approved the project toward final review. The Wellesley Grove Association wishes to express its great dismay that no notice was given of the changes in the plans, design, landscaping, and other crucial inputs prior to their submission at the time of the DRB meeting. Neither Wellesley Grove nor any interested party was given notice of the changes, nor the opportunity to review them prior to the meeting. Indeed, three of the sheets (3 Utility Plan, 4 Grading and Erosion Control Plan and 4A Landscaping Plan) are stamped as received on August 20t°, the day before the meeting. There was clearly no or very limited time for even DRB board members to review them. The developer stated at the time of the August 21 st DRB meeting that the changes were made in part to accommodate the concerns of neighbors, yet we had at the time and still have had no chance to review the new plans. For example, the proposed new buildings directly abutting Wellesley Grove were parallel to Wellesley Grove Building I in the initial drawings. When we expressed our concerns about loss of privacy and direct sight lines across such a short distance, the buildings were angled in the next proposal. Now we see that the buildings are parallel again in the new proposal! We also note with interest Homestead Design's comment at the DRB that buildings within the proposed new development will be no less than 100' apart, as anything less impacts privacy (in the designer's words) yet the proposed distance between Wellesley Grove building 1 and proposed new units is only 60'. The Wellesley Grove Association, as both an interested party to the development and as a body of concerned citizens, is deeply uneasy that the DRB gave its approval to the project with so many unanswered questions about design, landscaping, buffers, storm water, traffic and other factors. We continue in our desire to work together with the developer, and have scheduled a meeting with him on September 27&. We reiterate our procedural concerns and request that we have adequate time to review the proposed changes and comment upon them within the next few weeks. &AjUA o Barnard President, Wellesley Grove Condominium Association Cc: James Condos Terrance Sheahan Christopher Smith Stephen Magowan Daniel O'Rourke Mark Boucher James Cameron John Dinklage Roger Farley Larry Kupferman Gayle Quimby Eric Schmitt Juli Beth Hoover A State of Vermont Agency of Transportation National Life BuildingVTfans Drawer 33 fo Get You 1'he eMontpelier, VTWorking 105633-5001 November 6, 2001 Daniel & Leo O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407-2184 Subject: O'Brien Home Farm VT. Route 116,S. Burlin tgton Dear Daniel & Leo: On September 18, 2001, I received a copy of the letter and traffic counts submitted by Roger Dickinson of Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. These counts and a set of plans of the above location, were included with a highway access permit. The Agency has completed its review of the August 8, 2001 O'Brien Home Farm traffic study, performed by Lamoureux & Dickinson. The overall conclusion of the study was that the Hinesburg Road / Kennedy Drive intersection will have sufficient capacity to serve the traffic that will be generated by O'Brien Home Farm, once VTrans' Kennedy Drive reconstruction project is complete. This conclusion appears to be true, however the consultant didn't provide enough information in their analyses to alleviate our concern that the existing poor conditions at this intersection will get worse during the intervening time period. The study provides capacity analyses for 2001 DHV no -build, 2006 DHV no -build and build without Kennedy Drive improverrients, and 2006 DHV no-buildan ' �'y� n ' p `^ d build with KcniiCu" ter- v'e - rvveil',ents. Based on the consultant's 2006 DHV Build analyses, it appears that they are anticipating full build -out to occur by 2006. They state on page 8 of the study that the project will be phased, but they provide no analyses for any of the interim build phases. In addition, they haven't demonstrated in any of the analyses provided that similar or improved capacity results can be achieved under build conditions with existing geometrics at the Hinesburg Road / Kennedy Drive intersection. Because capacity problems currently exist during the AM DHV scenario at this intersection, as demonstrated by the consultant's 2001 analysis, it appears likely that the addition of any phased in project trips in the period prior to 2006 will make this situation worse. On page 4 of the study text , the consultant states that in performing capacity analyses, the existing signal phasing was maintained throughout, however they give no particular reason for this. Perhaps the consultant could alleviate our concerns by providing interim capacity analyses that reflect projected www.aot.state.vt.us Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is on Equal Opportunity Employer Daniel & Leo O'Brien November 6, 2001 Page 2 construction phases prior to full build -out, which utilize an alternate signal phasing plan. We have several comments related to procedures used by the consultant in calculating intersection volumes and in performing capacity analyses: Background Volumes: The consultant used the VTrans Continuous Traffic Counter Grouping Study and Regression Analysis book to calculate their DHV factors and their growth, factors. They used the book based on 2000 traffic data to calculate DHV factors, but then used the book based on 1999 traffic data to obtain their growth factors. Year 2000 data should have used throughout the process, however because the projected growth factors for this study area were higher in the 1999 book, the consultant's volumes were on the conservative side. When calculating the DHV factor for their Hinesburg Road / Hayes Avenue volumes, the consultant divided their calculated DHV by a peak hour turning movement volume that was too low. This resulted in the DHV factor for this intersection being substantially higher than necessary. In addition, the consultant inadvertently applied their year 2000 to year 2001 growth factor twice, which caused their analysis volumes to be even higher. Also when calculating background volumes for the Hinesburg Road / Hayes. Avenue intersection analyses, the consultant applied DHV and growth factors only to the northbound and southbound through volumes. Adjustment factors should also have been applied to the intersection turning movements, unless a justification was given for using the raw volumes. Other Permitted Development: No mention of other permitted development was made in the study. Since the completion of this traffic study, Technology Park, located on Kimball Avenue, has received permits for a portion of their planned development. Any further capacity analyses performed by the consultant should take these permitted trips into account. Capacity Analyses: For the Hinesburg Road / Kennedy Drive AM analyses, the consultant used arrival type 4 for the eastbound and westbound through and right -turn movements. For the PM analyses, the arrival types for these movements were changed to 3. No explanation for this was given. For the Hinesburg Road / Hayes Avenue analyses, the consultant used 0% trucks. Based on the raw turning movement volumes provided by the consultant, it appears that actual truck volumes were available. Had they not been available, a default percentage should have been used. Daniel & Leo O'Brien November 6, 2001 Page 3 Left -Turn Lane Warrant Analyses: We agree with the consultant's method of performing their left -turn lane warrant analysis at the Hinesburg Road / Hayes Avenue intersection. However because of the problems we detailed above with calculating background volumes at this intersection, the results of the analysis may not be accurate. In conclusion, we would like the consultant to provide interim capacity analyses that reflect projected construction phases prior to full build -out. These analyses should include any Technology Park trips which have been permitted since this study was permitted, keeping in mind that Technology Park may be required to make interim changes to signal timings at the Kennedy Drive / Kimball Avenue intersection. We would also like the consultant to provide new left -turn lane analyses for the Hinesburg Road / Hayes Avenue intersection, using corrected background volumes. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call me at (802) 828-2487 or by E- mail at pete. daye@state. vt. us. Sincerely, Pete Daye Project Supervisor Utilities & Permits Unit cc: Roger Dickinson, Lamoureux & Dickinson Town of South Burlington District Environmental Coordinator #4 Richard Hosking, District Transportation Administrator #5 If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Since ely, 71J, ay Nadeau Superintendent Cc. Stephanie Smith -- \ , .tooromoa ro�eat» _ \ I erwrnq 9' A91rGnA'� tT°'•/ / ', , t, wreniae - � P/anniny and Zoning /nfet�tnotian / O$den 8rottts�s ,f. y� Agency, bra A�8 Crow Cc»daminwm , - �.' ,"-to•"1 \ �'✓ Oana^/AppLicont }� gig sLy'l� piton Rood / *A— Ise Pb;. Ar / as/•Y {' , '�V i \ \ Forest Park Realty va p' �• M y ;[fi I.SIBJ W*.. 21f Pogo 20 7� •� ' ! { Namlicer d Ism Georgetown Homeowners` I ersec.'!o,7 with Xeonedy P.O. Box 2184 i �edy 'e �o \ \ '855 fN//isfda Read ASSoelot/an nve to be designed by -a BtWkgtm Vermont 0540-T K� o � - ,t/c onond-✓ohnson / \ 7anlrry aiRtrlet g •Su mete tow0ae� / \� 'R /~• - t ' \ fi'mdino Brook Rantla/ 7 Zevling AaPra�'' / � 4`� 1: { � _....., «, i � ! ' \ Poroe✓ 1260-�?� ^a u Tox Porch 0971r-Zj2 F 1l _ - as �� ee (tip) roaothn . / \ axern9 12 ta Area e9.1 S ,aG - g o 1 CPA Partnership / i a."- , sai .%. t p -�/ I 1 ��— - - �•or..ts,e Taomm 0 outh Buriavgiovr t: ue and a / lam _ { V ISO w s PARK 0 ! ua to ^ Mw Act 2' Lot Y Loscdo \.. 45 ✓nits .,..� ` .y- j1�f j �. t -- ;� {`_: Ys \ �t r/,• WeftMC Sugortrea pCOt/On .�OD yp.v. rs Him Mnd,ldoe Homeoeners \ L f. f...; - Association v - £xlsLhv of Uaooe Pravaard Lot Copetea nswd a/A»+ F,.w Lot 3 •.• � �-� v >' ' /fi F� t ? war„,. 17s Page 42\ �y- Ler r .sogaa k. Dia,vyl Neo+e Fan, / l -� ✓« - f `(" Fecnrory 2 /9er j [d 1 A5 , 1 \�.'?o� � �v�-' .�t � I `�_ � � � � - �- � ,- a \ \ _,r..-•- " Praoas•d Ravdrttrid Unit: r t'il 45 0a/!s aaR a•On« 70 sif aex Let e z e m ate. eaavt ..c I&M .Rvel�r - 4e arts roes c—q.- n9s Let2 (S.T Isom Lot d r, Paklna/Aw =061 al /Azi 5 Y Ot en Forrtdy Ldntted Partanrsh{g ` \ r r ' \ \ - • • . \ 2 rx 1 ^ 1 VNume 420 Page , 1 \i e w \ Y �WV1/1 '.ar°ve*' s i L naffs +\ Oeeember X, 1997 �\ a v,w a , sy ••Y . \ \ ✓ Fa.r /oe A \ toed co 3stosm aex � , x.�r• �L S S ���� ✓ � , � 4 � •\\ \+' Ro,d= at810 ;t s2fa \ ,I„- 1 Forest Ptak Realty Corp. ? W� l �� ,.I • • • \ ' \S• RMMK� w 1 �� . staac q.va9:.r. 121x Vdume 142 Poge 497 p • Ap \ \ \ *. • r rd c .yoga 9Rsm r ,Rory Maher \ ''^'°"'"�''•"' August 24•: 1978 ity • \ SS ° wkxx 91 Pa9e .1s9 `\ Remdlnhg Lands + \ 4.15 Acres / • • • \ :or 9Ptl Rats case/ A,.P-t xv 1969 •!e'1 0'6risn Family Limited Partnershlp 1 - • • �'\ _ae.ar- _,s9 �.r. S4m Area = 1S9 acres Remoeling Lands al�i.� / \\\ \ �•^ P� yr 4 r;.a• (to l l Forest Port Realty •w 1 \ ' Area = 34.5 acres fj� , w \ \\ 'r ; �.(� \\ Bayberry Lars { p �� \ 41 4 Now �198Y— --- " _ � �^ \ — — R-1., tbl 7 Zodn9 Oono/d & ReierraW f� mp 1 Sondra �"• 1 'y \\ ✓Nome J56 1 I 1 :. .... - a'•ge J oac.�ae-t i'� I I 1 1 11 � 'a..'e ti % 4 iww,y�"....... ....._ ,.......:�.._ 799j 1 Steven & I Gardner & 1 1 « «.---- ....----« «... ....+ \ \\ \ 0 \ \ Anne I Be-ly l \ \\ Vbldmon III Hopwood 1 \ \ wW- .i50 I V w- f75 1 1 1 `-..,'P \ a 40' 1 P w 554 1 /y z Isel 1 /Keio re»or ono \ — AagAW 4 1995 ,e1 •s•tk� l �� 1 w4xne Im Pop. 46J W4 —---'--------- Aoat 19e2 1 1 -1 Robert ? 199 Pope 1 6Wlfngton Hgh•woys & Reads 14, 198J , 1 ✓Yun1e I Paps l / 1 .'.s•�. � � y — — — — — _ — — \..,._; \ CYd F Road�----- --------- �• - "-'---- ---------------------- ------------ .32•'w serdact (rip) Jy ......—ram \ i"--"`-j �o ie1 ✓ ,� sondes 1 `---�--.-'�_— Q/d Farm Rood � /: \ - --.,.� G B ien ( Donlel ✓. R Ceo ✓. ✓c -�, --- - - -_ _ - _ _- - - _ - _ - - - ..- - - - - J _ D'Brien 1 i 1 Donie/ % e'r Leo ✓ ✓. :?erdmiial a <,.,;,, Dome/ J.& Lso J ter. O'3risn / A"aha'ts l . :.�.,1• ReswenfAy s 7 itq I Je ien 1 9 Legend £xlsthg power pde Dote nHsad IOvaabtron l71saksd Data 1T Survey Caatro/ Point Design � Existing h}ora11 �faFatP/swtf OVero// P/an Colcuated cam•: Monumentauan SOteS.' Dvef to be sal at o•neri d/rocfion. 71e /orvtte» and moterrals of axLstlrrg ut!/ltles !s not wayranred Cha,ll:ad ® Iran pipe found to be exact - cam ete. the Cmtractor sho/! fieid locate al/ , J-Je J! o 1'p��/7'/'p^D�'') o' so' roc' 2Dd' ;c0' 409' .sm• p✓ Scale 1' = 700' O i./ / J ii n J / Vm / S.i/ / ! t _ ldre utL'ties and be tdNy responsAS/e rot a// existing ut�Yities and - - Exfs road line their ImmteYrbptetd services The Controctor sear! c..;Z1 O!g Date -1 1, moor u'+9 Safe be/are commenting any work. Nbtlmd setback Pro'tct 00182 Old Fomr Rood South Buel lion. Vermont Bar 5COAe a9' �'... Optlond space 2 firs pyon is o no way o boundary survey. _ � ��„-�, PERMIT ` r IANSINC Consudtin B'n ineers, Ina. ��-_ " 1<�4t Iftxan Streef Colchester, Pernaaret 0541,f6 STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Vermont Agency of Natural Resources will hold a public hearing, in accordance with 10 V.S.A. 1263(b) on its tentative determination to issue a discharge permit for an application filed by: Daniel and Leo O'Brien, Jr. Forest Park Realty Corp. P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05403 The Agency of Natural Resources proposes to issue a discharge permit (# 1-1520) to the above named applicant for the discharge of treated and controlled stormwater from building roofs and roadways of the proposed O'Brien Home Farm residential subdivision located off of Route 116, and Kennedy Drive, in South Burlington, Vermont to tributaries of Potash Brook. The Agency will accept comments on all relevant issues pertaining to this discharge permit. A public hearing will be held on February 27, 2002 at 6:00 PM at the South Burlington High School, Room 108-109, 550 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT to receive public comments on the draft permit. Any person may submit oral or written comments at the public hearing. In making a final determination on the application, the Agency will consider all information received by that date or presented at the hearing. The application and draft discharge permit are on file and may be inspected at the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Stormwater Management Section, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408. Copies of this information are available at cost and may be obtained by written request or by calling (802) 241-3770. Januaii 21, 2002 O; BRIEN B R O T H E R S r Agency, Inc. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT Mr. Bruce Hoar January 30, 2002 Public Works Director City of South Burlington 500 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: O'Brien Home Fan-n Development Dear Bruce, In regards to the above -mentioned project, I need some direction from you regarding our ingress and egress on Kennedy Drive. As you know, given the fact that Kennedy Drive is being re -designed, we have agreed to build what will best work with that re -design. I have set a deadline for myself (and my consultants) to submit to the D.R.B. for final application by February 5th. I met with Roger Dickinson, to review the application, and to make sure we have satisfied all of the outstanding criteria for final review. Roger will be designing the triangular median to further prevent unauthorized left-hand turn movements. That specification will be incorporated into our submittal. In the FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION of the Preliminary Plat application, .condition #14 .3 states "a median be provided on Kennedy Drive to prevent unauthorized left -turn movements". Per our recent discussion, it has been brought to light that you do not recommend a median in this location. Therefore, could you please indicate in writing to the D.R.B. what the City's position is on this median? Please keep in mind that you and I realize that this letter addresses two different medians, and that it is possible that the DRB members might think that there is only one. The first is a triangular shaped median that will straddle the existing right of way, and the second is a median in the middle of Kennedy Drive. Again, I am hoping to submit to the DRB by February 5th, therefore a rapid response addressed to the DRB would be greatly appreciated. Respectfully, Patrick O'Brien Project Manager O'Brien Brothers Agency Inc. cc: w/out enclosure: Darren Benoit, McFarland -Johnson, Inc. Roger Dickinson Lamoureux & Dickinso Mike Burke, Krebs & Lansing Ray Belair, City of South Burl. 1855 Williston Road • P.O. Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 • (802) 658-5000 • fax 658-5002 e-mail: OBrienBros@aol.com South Burlington planning & Zomng To: South Burlington City Council Chuck Hafter From: Juh Beth Hoover, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning RE: Potential City Park on O'Brien Brothers property, Kennedy Drive Date: Friday, November 02, 2001 As you are probably aware, the O'Brien Brothers are seeking subdivision and Planned Residential Development (PRD) approval for their property bounded by Kennedy Drive, Hinesburg Road and Old Farm Road. The current application is to divide the property into three lots and build approximately 110 apartment, condominium and townhouse units on the lot fronting on Hinesburg Road, adjacent to the Wellesley Grove condos. The property proposed for subdivision and development is in the R7 Residential zone. The DRB has asked Planning Commission and City Council to recommend an area of land on this property for negotiation for acquisition as part of the review of this development application. Planning Commission, after considerable work and with the concurrence of the City's Recreation Department, has recommended a roughly six -acre area along Kennedy Drive that they believe would provide an excellent location for a neighborhood park. They are recommending this area for the following reasons: ® It is easily and logically accessible by recreation path, walking path, and existing and fixture roads v It provides two large, flat areas that can easily be developed for passive recreation and open space, in keeping with the City's recommendations for neighborhood parks o It incorporates a wetland area and two drainages that can be retained as natural areas ® The wetland and drainage areas would provide a logical and attractive separation between the two flatter recreation areas ® It relates well to planned and potential future phases of the O'Brien development ® It would buffer the Windridge neighborhood from future phases of the O'Brien development ® A parking area could be developed easily in a logical location accessible from Kennedy Drive. The rest of this memo outlines the analysis the Planning Commission and staff went through in making this recommendation. If you concur, the DRB has asked that you make a motion -recommending the Planning Commission begin the process to amend the Official leap to show dais specific parcel as a future neighborhood parr MEMO South Bdrllragton Plaaamng & Zomng Definition of "Neighborhood Park" On this property, the Official Map shows a generalized circle indicating a future "neighborhood park," but does not specify a size or specific location for the park. Thus the Planning Commission looked at the Comprehensive Plan and the potential buildout of the property to figure out the appropriate size and location for a park - The Comprehensive Plan defines "neighborhood park" as: The focus is on informal active and passive recreation. It should be centrally located within its service area encompassing a 1/4 to 1/2 mile distance. It should be accessible by way of interconnecting trails, sidewalks, or low volume residential streets. 5 acres is considered the minimum size, 5-10 acres is optimal. Neighborhood Parks ar enot intended to be used for program activities that result in overuse, noise, parking problems, and congestion. It should achieve a balance between active and passive park uses. (p. 71) Standard for Acres of Parkland per Person The City's adopted standard in the Capital Budget for parkland is 7.5 acres per 1,000 residents. Full build -out of the O'Brien parcel as currently zoned would support roughly between 949 and 1,044 new residents, which works out to a demand for about 7 to 8 acres of parkland. I have shown a calculation based on both the 2000 Census data for average household size in the City (2.31), and a smaller household size more typical for the type of multi -family units proposed. 2000 Max. # of Average HH Potential Smaller Potential Zoning Acres units size population HH size population R-7 59.5 416 2.31 961 2.1 874 R-1 9 9 2.31 21 2.1 19 Total 68.5 425 2.31 982 2.1 893 Standard for park Average Household Projected land per 1,000 Acres Size population residents (acres) required Smaller size (2.1) 893 7.5 6.6975 2000 Census (2.31) 982 7.5 7.365 JWM0 South Burlington Flanning & Zoning Thus an area in the neighborhood of seven acres is what the Capital Budget and Comprehensive Plan call for to serve the potential future population in this area. Site Selection With the rough size we were looking for established, the next job was to find the right area of the property. The Planning Commission and Recreation Department staff, along with some neighbors from Wellesley Grove, did a site visit to the property in July. Initially we looked at the flat meadow along Hinesburg Road near the intersection with Hayes Avenue. However, this is exactly where the first phase of development is proposed. The O'Briens suggested the Planning Commission look at another part of the property along Kennedy Drive. Bruce O'Neill, Marcel Beaudin, Patrick O'Brien and I went and looked at this area, shown on the attached plan, in September. Bruce, Marcel and I were pleasantly surprised and felt that this area made a great deal of sense for a neighborhood park. It includes two fairly large, flat areas of roughly two acres each, that would be very easy to clear and landscape for park areas. Jim Harvel from the Public Works Department measured the site and prepared the attached site boundaries. The first, adjacent to Windridge, has mature deciduous trees and would be a good location for picnic tables or benches and some smaller grassed areas. The second flat area, which is across a small wooded drainage area from the first one, is currently forested with White Pine. If cleared, this would provide a good site for a meadow for dog walking, frisbee, or pick-up games. The first flat area also ties into the wetlands behind the first phase of development, and would provide a nice transition between the houses and the park area. Access While they have not applied for any development beyond the 110 units in the first phase, the O'Briens have tentatively identified a location for a curb cut on Kennedy Drive that would provide access to future phases of this property. The proposed road and recreation path alignments for the first development phase are designed so that they could be tied into this road. This potential access point would tie in very well with the potential park area, providing a good spot for car access and parking without creating another curb cut on Kennedy Drive. This area is also readily accessible by existing walking paths on the O'Brien's property, the recreation path network that is planned for the first phase of development, and the sidewalk along Kennedy Drive. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 19, 200I Mr. Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Realty P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Final Plat Application - Hinesburg Road & Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. O'Brien Enclosed please find a copy of the minutes of the Development Review Board meeting of August zi, zooi. If you have any further questions, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl./td 7 T. J. BOYLE AND ASSOCIATES Landscape Architects & Planning Consultants 301 College Street BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 (802) 658-3555 FAX (802) 863-1562 TO ��947Ct�'IE:N'r Qc- 77? JijrA.)5ye 7—wilA/G G1714s' C Sa.rrt4 73cmltaaToy . V6n4opjr .576- 7)t�� err' WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings W Prints ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ Plans DATE +{` `O J OB NO. ATTENTION RE: ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2%vo 0 3 c-'�j 1 %6 L / - LG „ x THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: AFor approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FORBIDS DUE ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO 1A-r 0 `the-M Se—-7—. SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify C U Mr. Ray Belair City of South Burlington Office of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Belair, Carol Barnard 630 Hinesburg Rd, #20 South Burlington, VT 05403 2 August 2001 I am writing to you as President of the board of directors of Wellesley Grove Condominium Association and as chair of that association's ad hoc committee on the O'Brien development. This committee has retained consultants in three areas of great concern to us: storm water runoff, wetland preservation, and traffic. I am enclosing the consultant reports on storm water and wetlands. The traffic report will be sent to you as soon as our consultant, Michael Oman, has had a chance to review the traffic study that has yet to be submitted by Mr. O'Brien. In addition to these two consultant reports I am enclosing our comments and suggestions on the points to be considered at the next Development Review Board meeting about the O'Brien development. I understand that this meeting is scheduled for August 2151. We have met with Mr. O'Brien several times and are currently considering a proposal that might mediate some of our differences. In the mean time, please consider all of our concerns with this development. Sincerely, AXJ "Vj— Carol Barnard President, Wellesley Grove Condominium Association Enclosures: Wetlands report ,! Stormwater RunoffA.nalysis� Cho r LQAt- tht' - Cc: ,Jim Condos V Juli Beth Hoover John Dinklage Wellesley Grove Condominium Association Comments on O'Brien Farm Subdivision In light of all the evidence contained in the attached reports and excerpted below, and in absence of final traffic data (not yet submitted), we request the following changes as a minimum: • that the northernmost three buildings be removed (the building closest to the wetlands and the two buildings closest to unit 1 of Wellesley Grove --see attached), • that traffic patterns on Kennedy Drive be reconsidered BEFORE the egress to Kennedy Drive is approved, • that the buffer be increased to 100' to protect environmentally sensitive areas and preserve the wetlands and old growth trees as recommended by our wetlands consultant, and • that recommendations from our storm water consultant be implemented as part of the development design. RATIONALE AND OVERVIEW The O'Brien Brothers and Milot Properties began the permitting process for Wellesley Grove in the early 1980s. The project was then sold to a developer who filed an amendment to these permits in 1985. Mr. O'Brien is proposing a similar process for his new development. Therefore, a study of Wellesley Grove after 15 years of existence may provide some insight into what may occur with the Old Farm Road development. Wellesley Grove was originally proposed to contain 7 buildings, with a total of 28 units. The development review process resulted in a smaller design of only 6 buildings and 24 units. The original design, although it may have met density requirements, was on property that could reasonably contain fewer buildings and roads than originally proposed. The results of our work and our consultants' work have demonstrated that this new O'Brien design is also too dense for the property on which it will be built. The proposed design serves as an example of the developer's inclination to design the equivalent of"10 pounds of sausage into a 5 pound casing!" At the time of the Wellesley Grove construction, regulations to protect the wetlands and conservation and open space district, as well as the small stream on the property, were not as stringent. Only a few feet separate our buildings from these environmentally sensitive areas. These unit owners are not able to use lawn areas adjacent to their decks because of the sloping nature of the land and the danger of erosion. We are asking the DRB to protect these areas from the additional impact of this enormous new undertaking through increased setback from the wetlands and reduction in the number of allowed buildings. There is a large berm between our buildings and Hinesburg Road. The slope of this berm presents major maintenance problems. The developer of Old Farm Road proposes the addition of 6' to 8' of fill on the property to allow for walkout basements, creating an approximate 1 in 5 slope. The soils on this property are prone to erosion when subject to increased velocities and volumes from runoff such as may result from roofed areas and paved areas. Maintenance of these slopes will be difficult, resulting in an inability to contain the runoff from nearby roofs and patios. DENSITY The allowed density on this property is between 113 and 90 units. The developer has requested 101 units. It is our understanding that this range of allowable density has been established to account for property where the gross acreage allows full build -out but the configuration of the land does not. We strongly suggest that the lower density requirement should be placed on this development. There are several reasons for our suggestion: impact on fragile wetlands that drain into Potash Brook (on the federal `impaired" waterway list); the need for setback and height variances to be able to "sandwich" all the proposed buildings onto the property; impact on traffic and schools. See our notes below on each of these subjects. (Note that the term "sandwich" has been used by the developer to describe the wetland area park to be deeded to the city.) ACCESS/CIRCULATION The applicant has requested a variance for the required private circulation road width to 22' rather than 24'. This impacts snow removal and roadside parking. It is another indication that the developer is attempting to place more buildings and roads in the development than the land configuration will allow. PARK AREA The total area of the park area that will be deeded to the City is 3.4 acres. The public use will be walking, sitting, biking and contemplating whatever nature is left in the area. Our concern is that easier access to this fragile wetland environment will encourage abuse of the buffer and encroachment into the wetlands. This infringement into Old Farm Road Development 08/06/01 Page 1 the wetland area will adversely affect the native animal and plant population that will have already been disturbed by nearby construction. The developer has described one of the proposed wetland park areas as being "sandwiched between Georgetown, Wellesley Grove, and the Townhouse unit we are requesting." The operative word here is "sandwiched". SCHOOL IMPACT The report from the South Burlington School District business manager says that school can handle the 51 students estimated from this phase of the development but makes special note that the school district is concerned "with the cumulative impact of prior and continuing development". The report also states that: "this project, coupled with previous projects from last year and current requests may cause the district to accelerate the year where the maximum capacity is reached." It also states that "Construction aid for schools are now placed on a priority listing that would appear to make it difficult for So. Burlington to gain aid in a timely fashion to meet impending capacity needs if development would continue at the accelerated pace of the past two years" (see attached). UTILITIES — STORMWATER RUNOFF Our consultant has suggested that the developer should continue site work on western edge along Hinesburg to include the adjacent lot with the house, the culvert under Wellesley Grove driveway, and possibly the ditch along Hinesburg to the north. Our consultant has suggested that the developer should construct a small berm between two properties to contain storm water runoff along the shared property line. WETLANDS, CONSERVATION/OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Buildings and patios are designed to be built directly at the 50' wetland buffer. We question the developer's ability to control impact on the buffer during construction, preserve trees and shrubs and protect existing drainage swales. Snow banks along public road, private roads and parking areas will melt into the wetlands, carrying with it oil, gas, salt, dirt and other contaminants. Storm water treatment proposed by the developer should decrease runoff to wetlands by nearly one half. This cannot help but adversely affect the wetland environment. Our consultant has requested that the US Army Corps of Engineers survey the wetland designation. She believes that there is one area in which the wetland extends further than indicated on the maps. COVERAGE, SETBACKS The developer has requested many variants for height and setback distances. We believe that he is trying to place larger houses and more roads on this property than it can handle. TRAFFIC How does the completion of this phase I of the larger development correlate with the completion of the widening of Kennedy Drive? What sort of traffic calming features will be built into the roadway design? Can truck traffic be limited? It is very difficult to understand that on one hand we lament the fact that we are overwhelmed by heavy traffic, yet on the other hand keep approving development that can do nothing but contribute to this heavy traffic. South Burlington has the heaviest traffic in the state, with some intersections approaching 40,000 vehicles per day. Is it possible that some developers' traffic experts have `missed the mark"? Is the DRB permitting too much growth too quickly and consequently overwhelming our infrastructure? Should we not widen roads, build sidewalks and recreation paths and then determine how much more development should be allowed? LANDSCAPING We have received conflicting information about the existing trees and shrubs on the shared property line behind the proposed townhouses and our building 1. We have been told alternately that the vegetation will be removed beyond the 30' buffer line, all vegetation will remain, or some vegetation will remain. Which is correct? The developer wants to decrease the diameter of roadway trees and decrease spacing between them. Our experience is that for 10 years it looks fine, after that there are costly problems associated with managing overcrowded trees. Old Farm Road Development 08/06/01 Page 2 PARKING Storm water runoff from rain will be diverted towards the roadway drains and into storm water retention ponds. However, snow banks along the roadways and parking areas will melt directly into the wetland area, carrying with it salt, oil, gas, dirt that was plowed up with the snow. HEIGHT VARIANCE Does the applicant need height variance for the townhouses? We understand that he must measure from the pre -development ground level. Three-story buildings are definitely not in keeping with the neighborhood, especially those buildings abutting other condominium association land. Three-story buildings will adversely affect the essential character of the neighborhood. The developer will be unable to screen effectively the line of sight from the main living areas in new townhouses directly into bedroom area of existing townhouses. Further, on -street parking at the proposed level of 6' to 8' higher than present ground level (i.e., at the height of the front door, one flight up from the walk -out basement) will shine car lights right into the I' floor living and 2"d floor bedroom areas of the adjacent Wellesley Grove units in building 1. We thank you for your attention to these important issues. Old Farm Road Development 08/06/01 Page 3 pct 250 School Impact Questionnaire for Residential Projects Applicant to Complete: Municipality: South Burlington Number of Lots or Units: 101- Hayes Ave/Hinesburg/Kennedy Estimated Number of Students: 56 multi -family units x 2 bedrooms=112 x .1313=14.71 45 townhouse x 3 bedrooms= 135 x.2625 = 35.43 Total: 50.14 School Superintendent or Equivalent to Complete: What schools under your supervision will provide educational services for families who will live in this project? Elementary School: Chamberlin Middle School: FHTMS High School: SBHS Do these schools have the capacity to accept the additional students listed above? (assume equal grade distribution) Yes or No If "no," what is the deficiency? While at the present time the school district can accommodate the additional students projected by this individual project, the concern for the School District is with the cumulative impact of prior and continuing development in our community and the District's capacity to serve the students. This project, coupled with previous projects from last year and current requests, may cause the district to accelerate the year where the maximum capacity is reached, necessitating construction of a new facility. The passing of Act 60 adds additional concerns regarding development and developments impact on the tax rate. Construction aid for schools are now placed on a priority listing that would appear to make it difficult for So. Burlington to gain aid in a timely fashion to meet impending capacity needs if development would continue at the accelerated pace of the past two years. Any construction costs that are not offset by revenues other than property tax would further penalize our communities by increasing our above block cost for students and the corresponding taxes that would be raised and sent to the sharing pool. What plans are in place to correct the problem? Impact fees will serve to recapture space and renovate them into useable classrooms. District Offices will rent/build space outside of school facilities. If plans exist, how could this applicant help achieve those plans beyond adding new homes to the grand list? It is recommended that South Burlington continue to balance its growth between business and housing. Do you have other comments? See above I certify the above information is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Marilvn Frederick Name Business Manager Position 2-22-01 Date Are you available, after sufficient notice, to answer questions related to the above statements at an Act 250 hearing? X Yes or No No Text Co LOW- tv" x Iozo 4Z 007713W No Text CITY OF SOUTH B URLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNENG & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 31, zooi Mr. Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Realty P.O. Box z184 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Final Plat Application, Hinesburg Road & Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. O'Brien: Enclosed please find a copy of the Finding of Facts of the Development Review Board meeting on August zi, zooi (effective date August 27 2001). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the final plat application be submitted within Iz months or this approval will be null and void. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. S incerely, Sarah MacCallum Associate Planner Enclosure a46 lorrn water r? lj(117 -7/j77 ern sin P/-A /V,1AAvj'&' b L un AMT F11 AN T AM Url- j-,/-f7 it CCPT� $ tO M, jo-h cie r0bo T/C p Aug-15-01 08:48A Robe( C. Krebs 802-4 -9618 P.02 FIOMEFARNI DE,NSITV ANALYSIS 'T(YFAL ARIA OF L0 I'S 4—mid Right of Wcay::.:: 18,66 AREA. 01, W"ll" H-.,A.ND >.;: (E)3 Acres DEVFJIVAIII... E.A.R.E'Aa, - 19.66 - O73 ;-: '1 7.93 A.(! res ALLOW 15% AREA. FORAZOADWA 'Y'S '17.93 * 0.85-: 15.214 Acres MAXIMUM NTIAL, DF.,NSVT-'Y ;- 7, V. 1 .1 - 15.14 - 7 106 Unit; Aug-15-01 08:48A Robe( C- Krebs 802-4 -9618 P.03 O'BRIEN Ft(* . W.F. FARM I)ENSrl"'V ANAI..A'SJS D)TAI, AREA OF LOTS L.2.')�, 4.and Right ofWay 18.66 A;:re,-i MAXIMUM. RESIDENTIAL 1.)F"ASVFY;x-, 7 Lirkits1:6.cre = 18.66 * 7 =! 130 (Jnit� WM. D. COUNTRYMAN Environmental Assessment And Planning 868 WINCH HILL ROAD NORTHFIELD, VERMONT 05663 802-485-8421 9 August 2001 Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Realty P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407-2184 Subject. ArrowWood Environmental review and wetland evaluation. Dear Pat, I have reviewed the report by Dori Barton, and offer the following initial comments. First, my conclusions are that the wetlands are Class III because there is no wetland connection between them and the nearest Class II wetland (the series of wetlands along Potash Brook to the northwest beyond Kennedy Drive). Ms. Barton, on page 4 of her letter, concurs. However, her statement that the "designation of Class III wetland signifies that the Army Corps of Engineers .... (has) jurisdiction over activities involving development in and near the two wetlands...." is inaccurate. Wetland classification --- ----- under the Vermont Wetland Rules is irrelevant to the Corps, and Corps jurisdiction - applies to the wetlands themselves, not the adjacent upland. Her comments on the accuracy of my delineation refers to the "northern" end of Wetland A, by which I assume she means the eastern, or upstream, end. As I recall, the basic topographic shape found in the wetland continues upslope, but one or more of the required criteria (wetland plants, hydrology, hydric soils) drops out at the limits we delineated. I believe our delineation is defensible. In regard to "Natural Community Characterization" and the references to the condition of Potash Brook, these were subject beyond the scope of our work at the site. However, the woodland in question is of a sort that is common in this part of Vermont, and does not have characteristics that make it unusual as a community. Wildlife likely to be found here (as noted on page 3 of her letter) are common species, mostly of the type adaptable to human presence and activity. As to Potash Brook, consideration of that stream should enter the discussion only if it can be shown that the proposed project will somehow have deleterious effects on it. Proposed buffer zones, erosion control measures and other accepted engineering practices can ensure that the project will have no off -site impacts to natural resources. The wetland evaluation included in the ArrowWood submittal is incorrect. According to Ms. Barton, the project wetland is significant for 6 of 10 protected functions; in reality, the wetlands' have no significance for any of the functions. The evaluation is complicated by references to functions applicable to Potash Brook and conjecture on possible future conditions. Patrick O'Brien 9 August 2001 Page 2 5.1, Water storage for flood water and storm runoff Although the ArrowWood evaluation states that the project area wetlands are significant for Water Storage for Flood and Storm Runoff, there are a number of factors not taken into consideration. First, it is generally agreed that a wetland is not significant for this function if covering less than 1% of the subject watershed. The Potash Brook watershed drains some 4760 acres of Burlington and South Burlington, and the watershed downstream of the project covers about 3500 acres. In order for the wetlands to be significant, they would have to cover 35 acres (over half the property). Other factors also mitigate against significance for this function. Although there is technically a "constricted outlet" in the form of culverts under Kennedy Drive, these culverts are sized to pass any flows likely to be generated by these intermittent drainageways, hence there is minimal water storage. Furthermore, there are no "characteristics of the watershed that may increase the volume of runoff reaching the wetland." The ArrowWood evaluation considers factors not yet present (the proposed development) to evaluate this function rather than basing it on existing conditions, i.e., the wetlands' watershed is rural, mostly wooded and entirely undeveloped, with no impervious soils or steep slopes. 5.2, Surface and groundwater protection: A wetland can reduce the levels of contaminants in surface waters only when there are contaminants in surface waters. As noted above, the watershed above these wetlands is undeveloped, with no sources of pollution. Further, although there are sediment deposits in the wetlands, this is the result of very long-term processes, and there is no evidence that deposition is occurring at a significant level under existing conditions. Describing these wetlands as having "erect persistent vegetation wider than 20 feet" is an exaggeration; this terminology usually is reserved for conditions such as sedge meadows or cat -tail marshes, and does not apply here. Finally (and again), unfounded characterization of the effects of the proposed development has no place in an evaluation of existing wetland conditions. It is inappropriate to include conjecture on possible use of herbicides or fertilizers or on non - point sources of pollution. 5.4, Wildlife and migratory bird habitat: The only basis for finding the project area wetland significant for this function is the affirmative finding at subparagraph i, that the wetland "provides habitat that supports the reproduction of Jefferson salamander, blue - spotted salamander, yellow -spotted salamander or other uncommon amphibians." Unlike subparagraphs d, j or k, which only require evidence that the wetland "Supports or has the habitat to support....", 5.4i requires some positive evidence that the wetland supports reproduction by these amphibians. The listed species require "temporary Patrick O'Brien 9 August 2001 Page 3 woodland pools" or "shallow woodland pools" for breeding habitat, conditions that are lacking in the subject wetlands. As noted at subparagraph 5.4n, the wetlands do not contain evidence that they are used by wetland dependent species. 5.8, Recreational value and economic benefits: There is no evidence that the trail system that has evolved on this property is related in any way to the wetlands; on the contrary, they tend to avoid the wetlands as much as possible, regarding them as obstacles rather than subject destinations. Further, only by trespass do the "neighbors utilize area for walking and enjoyment". It is not the responsibility of the landowner to provide this service. 5.9, Open space and aesthetics: Although the wetlands are part of an area that could be described as open space, they are not, in themselves, significant for this function. Additionally, the wetlands do not possess unique aesthetic qualities, being merely depressions in the landscape that the average viewer would not even consider as wetland. As noted in subparagraph 5.9a, the wetlands cannot be readily observed by the public, a characteristic that is essential for aesthetic appreciation. 5.10, Erosion control through binding and stabilizing the soil: The evaluation for this functions appears to apply to Potash Brook rather than the subject wetlands. Conclusions at 5.10a, d, and e do not apply to these wetlands: the wetlands are not adjacent to either Potash Brook or Lake Champlain, the substrate is not rubble, cobble or gravel, there is not good interspersion of persistent emergent vegetation and water, and it is unlikely that any studies of wetlands such as these would find them important for this function. To the extent that the evaluation applies to the subject wetlands, it should be noted that it found no erosive forces present. The lack of erosive forces typically means that erosion is not occurring and that, as a consequence, erosion control is not considered a significant function. Again, conjecture on future conditions with the project should not be included in the evaluation. I have marked my calendar for 21 August (South Burlington Planning & Zoning) and 11 September (ANR site visit). Simerel Errol C. Briggs ECB/s _, State of Vermont Agency of Transportation National Life Building Drawer 33 V ran s Workingto Get you There Montpelier, VT 05633-5001 LETTER OF INTENT THIS IS NOT A PERMIT October 3, 2001 Daniel O'Brien & Leo O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. PO box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407-2184 Subject: South Burlington, VT116, L.S. 159+32 RT Dear Daniel & Leo: Your highway permit application to construct east approach making 4-way intersection, utility connections and construct left turn lanes, at the above -referenced location, has been reviewed and found to meet the requirements for work within the highway rights -of -way. Title 19 VSA § 1111 requires that we ensure compliance with all local ordinances and regulations relating to highways. Your highway permit application will be processed upon our receipt of conies of vour Act 250 and/or local approvals, includina all conditions. In cases where local zoning does not exist, a letter from the legislative body of the municipality will be acceptable. When issued, the permit will contain, but will not be limited to, the attached Special Conditions. This commitment is valid for two years from the date of this letter. Should your other permits require a longer time period, please contact us relative to an extension of time. If you have any further questions about this matter, please call me at (802) 828-2653. Sincerely, Pete Daye Y Project Supervisor Utilities & Permits Unit Attachment cc: Town of South Burlington District Environmental Coordinator #4 Lamoureux & Dickinson www.aot.state.vt.us Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. South Burlington, VT116, L.S. 159+32 October 3, 2001 SPECIAL CONDITIONS All work shall be accomplished in accordance with the attached plan dated August 14, 2001. Act No. 86 of 1987 (30 VSA Chapter 86) ("Dig Safe") requires that notice be given prior to making an excavation. It is suggested that the Permit Holder or his/her contractor telephone 1-888-344-7233 at least 48 hours before, and not more than 30 days before, beginning any excavation at any location. Any work done within the highway rights -of -way that is not addressed by the included plans will be done according to the Vermont Agency of Transportation 2001 Standard Specifications for Construction, with the latest amendments and all applicable VTrans Standards. The Permit Holder shall use methods that will minimize tracking of material onto state highways. If tracking does occur, it will be immediately cleaned up so that traveling conditions and safety of highway users is not compromised. A preconstruction meeting must be held prior to the Permit Holder's employees or contractor beginning work to discuss work to be completed. The Permit Holder is required to notify the District Transportation Administrator five (5) working days in advance of such meeting. The Permit Holder is to have a supervisory representative present any time work is being done in or on the State Highway right-of-way. Roadway shoulder areas will be maintained free of unnecessary obstructions, including parked vehicles, at all times while work is being performed under this permit. All grading within the highway right-of-way associated with the proposed construction shall be subject to inspection and approval by the District Transportation Administrator or their staff. In areas to be grass covered, the turf shall be restored by preparing the area and applying the necessary topsoil, limestone, fertilizer, seed, and mulch to the satisfaction of the District Transportation Administrator. Page Two All work in the State highway right-of-way shall be performed during normal daylight hours and shall cease on Sunday, on all holidays (which shall include the day before and the day following), during or after severe storms, and between December 1 and April 15, without specific, written permission from the District Transportation Administrator. These limitations will not apply for the purposes of maintenance, emergency repairs, proper protections of the work which includes, but is not limited to, the curing of concrete and for the repairing and servicing of equipment. Temporary pavement will be required prior to weekend shutdown after completion of backfilling where an open cut excavation has been made through a roadway subject to vehicular traffic or where construction for any roadway widening for turn lanes has been brought to grade. The temporary pavement shall consist of, at least, 2 inches of compacted bituminous concrete. Temporary pavement shall be properly maintained and shall be replaced with permanent pavement prior to completion of the project or suspension of work for the winter season. (This is a contingency condition in the event the "open cut method" is approved during construction.) The placement, size, shape, and color of all pavement markings will be in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Vermont Standards. All existing pavement markings that become disturbed or overlaid with pavement shall be replaced with "in kind" (durable or paint) markings. All costs associated with this work shall be borne by the Permit Holder. The Permit Holder shall be responsible to rebuild, repair, restore and make good all injuries or damage to any portion of the highway right-of-way that has been brought about by the execution of the permitted work, for a period of eighteen (18) months after final inspection by the District. Any variance from approved plans is to be recorded on "as-builts" with copies provided to both the Utilities Engineer and the District Transportation Administrator. Upon completion of the work by the Permit Holder, a final inspection will be held. The Permit Holder shall be responsible for all damages to persons and/or property due to or resulting from any work allowed under this permit. The Permit Holder shall defend, indemnify and save harmless the State, the Agency, and all of their officers, agents, and employees from all suits, actions, or claims of any character, name and description brought for or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person, persons or property, including all costs or expenses to defend against such suits, actions or claims. Page Three This permit does not become effective until the Owner/Applicant records, in the office of the appropriate municipal clerk, the attached "Notice of Permit Action". The access must be constructed in such a manner as to prevent water from flowing onto the highway. If the access is not constructed satisfactorily, the District Transportation Administrator can order reconstruction of the access at the Owner's ex- pense. This access will serve as the only access to this property and to any future subdivisions of this property unless approved otherwise by the Vermont Agency of Transportation. Curbing or other suitable physical barriers must be installed to control ingress and egress of vehicles to the approved access only. In the event traffic from this project increases to the point where traffic signals, additional lanes for turning or any other modifications are necessary, the expense of such improvements or facilities shall be borne by the Permit Holder, his/her successors, and assigns. The Permit Holder may be required by the Agency to update or provide a traffic study to determine if additional modifications are necessary. The Permit Holder is responsible for access maintenance (beyond the edge of paved shoulder). "Access maintenance" will include, but not be limited to, the surface of the access, the replacement of the culvert, as necessary, the trimming of vegetation, and the removal of snowbanks to provide corner sight distance. In conformance with Title 19 VSA § 1111(f), this access may be eliminated in the future where development has burdened the highway system to such an extent that a frontage road or other access improvements (which may serve more than one property or lot) must be constructed to alleviate this burden. The expense of the frontage road or other access improvements shall be borne by the Permit Holder, his/her successors or assigns of the properties abutting said frontage road or served by the access. The Agency of Transportation shall determine the need of a frontage road or other improvements based upon and justified by standard Agency procedures. TL. .� L.:. L. ....... -L - II L.-4.-II--1 L. . -I L - __J_-_ .:L4 I I IC 11191 Ivvay U ossing J1 Iai1 uc iilaLcallcu uy jacnu 1y U1 UU1 iilg in1 accoivai ice wiu the attached standard D-20. Open trenches or pits shall be filled at the end of each day. With permission from the District Transportation Administrator, trenches and pits may be left open for short periods of time if properly protected. In no case shall trenches or pits be left open over a weekend. Page Four Where a trench is excavated within the roadbed, all backfill material within 24 inches of the bottom of pavement shall be new material from a source approved by the District Transportation Administrator. All backfill material shall be placed in six inch layers and compacted to not less than 95% of the material's maximum dry density as determined by AASHTO Standard Method of Test, T-99, Method C, using air or mechanical tampers. (This is a contingency condition in the event the "open cut method" is approved during construction.) It is incumbent upon the Permit Holder to verify the appropriate safety measures needed, prior to construction, so proper devices and/or personnel are available when and as needed. Traffic control devices, shall be in conformance with the MUTCD (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices), Agency of Transportation Standards and any additional traffic control deemed necessary by the District Transportation Administrator. Failure to utilize proper measures shall be considered sufficient grounds for the District Transportation Administrator to order cessation of the work immediately. Construction will be performed in such a way as to minimize conflicts with normal highway traffic. Uniformed traffic officers or trained flagpersons, shall be provided when two-way traffic cannot be maintained, and at the request of the District Transportation Administrator whenever it is deemed necessary for the protection of the traveling public. Apo—h +a r f -Wnafe /om(ion \ / � f existing B" sever \ -Approxrmo& /xof fh 1 v i ormetmg 8' AsManomra Nm ,uy.-r O$rien Brothers Planning and Zoning Information / 'F• rc� lM1i//iston Road Agency, Inc. 9�9 \ \ / OwPlerLoa!ltant.• � / Yd a J9B Pogo 371 Wellesley Gro Con inium `� \ \ Forest Par* Reo/ry of o / No ber d l7 \ \ Intersect%on with Kennedy 1855 Wi aton Rood �Y Drive Q, �y may fa 19BJ roNme 4 PD� ea Cearyetown Homeowners Drive to be designed by P.O. Box 2184 KMIn J/ esp Assoc/abiw7 ' So. Burlfn ton, 14--t 05403 I - \ M'cFodond-✓ohnson Zoning District g APpn-knot, location / \ \ Residential 7 Zoning 0� Roo o! exiering l02' A.G / / / / \ \ t�, \ \ ' JO, pU0 tig ityP% \ \/ \ Windln BfOOR rox Porcef 0970-00255 9 rox Parcel 1260-00200 redne / ` x s \ \"' - - - - - - - Appraknare rom6an \ \ \ \�, P>P. X \ T _ / =_ _ _ \ \ \'»b1.101. 9 Iz" A.c A rota/ Area = 69.1 ones South Burlington CPA PartnershipA�nue ;k eY, at / Lot 3 \/ - \ - tat 1 '�� ' >" F� w«Lndc Location Mo,�_ 6 47 Units I. tea. 3 (K,J*, Type III \. i ° A.r.S Lant=er Lana , Kndrld a Homeowners \ \ 9 \ Existlna Lot Usage Proposed Lot Coveraces .// l \ ! D \ \ •� � - \ / ASSOC%OtiOn Wood d F/dd W e f75 Page 428 \ � Lot Co—g- f O8r/ H e F A\ \ bJ \ �` ✓e,� l Febroory 1, 1987 I *`/: Bl/ed i I �•< i�r a l+e4Proposed Residential Units tot I (B4 "s ar esl \ \ Lot I PorkmglP-ds = 44259 xf. 112X 76wnhousm-47 Units bWdwgy'Bdteparh� 7,075 xf. 75X Loft 7bAW Cs—g 940 x1 17. SX Mu/r/fwnAy - 48 lMih ToM Cororo9om 326X /- II__ \\\\\ Cftprd Cog, 31X \ G - _ o \ 4'-J a� � " ` 2 (SJ \� �y \ \ P-d 1k1'27ods- 3a 6,0 sf. 1S2X o q \ /T / .' \_'' i" ♦ sde»oct/Bar ©oa,= amo xt zas \\I O$rien Fomi/y Limited Portenership y , - l �. I \\ \ \ \ Buddings. J9,600 sL 1715Z \ Volume 420 Page J45 \\ :\, ?\�� ♦ `�. \ Coroger- 9500 xr. s /s \ December 31, 1997 \�\ \\�--� e \�v rota co—ge 39.05X I\ \ \ - Y \ 1 F nt j d Cowioge 15 BX 25.5 Acres (1\\\ _ - - j� \ - \ � � "IY \ \ T \ Nee ROW Road- 61,8T032 t BdrepotA>- 1A149 49 s/ 12IX Forest PgnF Realty Corp. \ FroMa,Y Volume 142 Page 497 \\ \ \ \ Toro( Co—ge 64.9X Mary Maher '}� 1 -i'" � ^" r < "* 1 August 24, 1978 \ \ \ \ Lot 3 Park (0.36 c- ) VW a 91 Pg. JJY \ Remaining Lands 43.5 Acres \ August 26, 1969 1 \ None OVrzen Family Limited Pa#tMershlp \ 1 Area = 15.9 acres; \1 Remolm.g Lands \\ \ Lot 4 Pork (1.9 a ) \ \\ Forest Park Realty Corp. \♦� \ \ -{_ \ Ncce \ 'Area =.-34.5 acres l\ r I \, \ r + 1 ♦\\\ \ \ \ \ Bayberry Lone No P,o� i2r.9sz_ _ ' �' .ram --------- \\ \ ---- Rwllmtia/ 7 Zoning I Donald ip -I'I° ♦\ \ -I�' dr Rexld t/d 4 Z ri19 ``.� 1 \ \ \ Sandra \ Rmd rone a ll ✓d356 \ \ \ \ Ratio;nNo' 7I \ \ ...........A,. Poge 317 I ,Patio No/ 4 Z A9 __���•••••••. 0--brr 21, ^" ........ 1993 I .....................\ \ LV'A een & oidner & I \\\ \ \ nnie Bevedy t 1 \ \ \ /dman Hopwood I \\ me 3B0 I Y wme 175 I r •� . m\ t 40' ��ugusPoge 584 Poge � ❑ At 4, 1995eg,�•. r ume 1B0 Poge 463 40 1 \ Robert P. Ryan 1 \\ _ I 1 1r'�n_j'-1,1 VW.., 199 Poge 29 1 1 Burlington High� ways & Roads \ I/ _ \ V November 14. 19B3 \ 1 \ � • \ e !Page I / L -. \—-------.-----__ 1 \ 1B12 _--------. 1 • 1 gd F Rood / Old Fdrm Road _ r — — _ _ -------------- ------ - Kennaugh _ _ _ _ _ _ To'PUo Ray Donis/ ,L &Sondra _ ad Form Road i �0 ! 0$rien - O$nen �L J Oonle/ J. &Leo ✓. ,h: C_ _ ommerch/ Z /ng / Residertrb� 4 Zooic onie/ ✓ &Leo J. Je OB ien Resident/d 47 mg a$rlen g O\ / Merchants Bonk Le_aend M. Existing power pole August 14. My Lots I and J 11P mob 8/14/01 Surrey Contra/ Point [Mfe re.rsed DesergoNni rneoked Dote V Existmg hydrant ^ �eS Design M� O vera// P/on /V brawn FMPISH A Calculated comer. Monumenfotlon /O to be set at owner's direction. Checked 1. fie /ocotian and materials of existing utfYities is not worront.vd _ � • /Ton pipe found to be exact or complete. fie Contractor shall Feld brats ✓l Scale 1 z 100' O Br�e/ /n Home Farm a' so' Joo' zoa' Jag' - Property line ult&les and be so%ly responsible for at ex%sting utih'ties and their unlntenupted services. fie Contractor shall contact Dtg Date Moy L 2001 Exlstmg wood line Safe before commencing any work. Wet/and setback Pro ect EI82 Old Form Road South Bur/;n ton lrermont Bt7% Scale 1" = lea' , ::, Optional space 2. firs plan is in no way o boundary surrey. FOR PERMIT REVIEW ""s & Ld's" Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr.:a:: - "'"'" ^ 164 Alin Street, Colchester, Fermont 064A6 N INA 4 S 1n Fe v ih i "• , f �A��S? _ {k' Sr' s $.++Fel .. •3H ��4':?�. 'Y Boundary Survey Sheet 1 Final Plat Sheet ,2 Sheet 3 overall Plan Utility Plan - Stonington Circle Sheet 13 Sewer / N'aEer Details Sheet 3,4 Sheet 4 Utility Plan -Stonington Circle Grading &Erosion Control Plan -Stonington Circle Sheet 14 Sheet 15 Sheet 16 Details Details Storm Basin Details ' OBRIEN HOME FARM Sheet 4A Grading & Erosion Control Plan - Stonington Circle Sheet 5 Sheet 6 Utility Plan - Lancaster Lane Grading & Erosion Control Plan - Lancaster Lane Sheet LI Sheet 12 Lancaster Place Landscape & Lighting Plan OLDFARMROAD Sheet 7 Sheet 7A Road & Utility Profile Sheet 1-3 Afagallowap Street Landscape & Lighting Plan Eldredge Street Landscape & Lighting Plan SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Sheet B Storm Drainage Profile Road & Utility Profile Sheet L4 Sheet L5 o. p,. ,�. 12W' Landscape Plan - Stonington Circle 1", Sheet 9 Road & Utility Profile Sheet L6 Landscape & Lighting Details Sign Details Sheet 10 Road & Utility Profile Sheet 11 Road Details BAR SCALE r a Sheet 12 Details "W&S AP L/NSGYG Consulting Anyineer' frtc !6f Alain St'rae; Col hestPr, A"WWnt 6S4WS CPA Partnership I A. r � I 4,0 . ete Jag `n / 06rien Brothers When. 188Page J14 Georgetown Association, Inc. N y /5, r98J Wellesley Grove WW- /23 Page J5J Condominium g gqpm.nber 24 1976 2 v LL1 517 11, ser WArme 214 Page 20J 4" Q'•\ a/a o-o vn ro/ , o1 mlas Py1as NownMm d leas ELLS1 1 ♦��� � - ✓01 ro. pates � CD to GEP 1 41on me t 05O Y IAI l Nr HNi ry Road mayy hove .noted din l0 1-89 \ DetoA ca a -tam o d oMr hero mte, fie trots- n.t.a. the of 8w NovWed y woo Yeed to eslab/kO Me paint/obebd MANER2 y MA!#R2 ra � 0 Ir r py/d5 ytiertiP� \ o a, Whdlnq Brook ♦�si� \ Coodam/nlums Deed References Volume Grantor, Grantee._.. Page Dinh/ J. 06rien d Leo 06r/ar, J, to 06rhn F-Wy LWW PwMersbp 420/J45 06rhn 6-athea to F est Pork Realty 142/07 dtatho R. f7tcs/mms to 06rierr B Mae 138/145 Robert P. Ryon M 06r! I &"t"" 136/117 Estote of Leo 06r/ to Leo J 02&1-, J- and Dm/d J Otki 48/45 Kennedy &IM aty South BuNington - of WW- 66 Poge 469 August 1864 K / � 'y J, W9klme 66 Page 457 August 79, 1g64 WAwne 7J Page 15 Ady 24 1964 Ydume 73 Page 16 August 2f4 19se Wrhme 7J Page 17 Sptembv 1, 1D64 `2 \Toe t, 0 �. \ - s \ Con ominlums WIndridge Homeowners \ Assocla VW- /75 Page I1B \ S + tkrober 24 1880 \ g 0 - �' �r N07-26�4~W N. T.S ♦ O -; UI 9 pg15> Frederick ✓..k.. v4 &Mary �, 4 O1 \ Maher ♦ ,\ \ KY.meg 1 Poo Jig -01 ♦ \\ Augu t 71, 1969 1' ' Forman & ✓oyce D ,46 vabme 186 hope 92 L�L a S7 ♦ ` \\ No wmbsr 1, 19BT � +1a q% t and l t \`` /' o-lP2, b tuna Total Area of Forest Park Realty Corp. and OBrien Family Limited Partnership E_" 5LK94 e ° parcels is 6B.5 Acres 13"W MANEREAsr L S 1 p ..r ";Np$O ,r13 c lrazss, N732509"W �;' �• o_ �T61 91 ei2a6� "'r Doi /P'a7 Gr li+t` 5rti tl f �; iv 'dill hole , San89.96, dra 12J14 7 l'0'5 W 14561' d GLlGtt7Rd e 7 v Pogo ooll J17 mN va29 e VP / r✓v.` 1 " IZI991Steam @ ofi a'vOldman, &ahv vdm360 Poge W4 'vHopwood 1995 de 175 Pogo 56� 'o nt M110 e ,kdy 2 1981 rz�f d r bns� f ` .v`•• urrsL �� / NB4:76"597 Det�d NWAD'//am t Modo Ly r r L - IdJ7 vM. Weiner Iv �, 7$-aau 314� �V voArme 180 Pogo 46J ;A. �'`�` RYAN9w 275.00' _ RrAtatw 3% l Pk+ Augusl2 1962/.. �G�!'w LL5 ser r u ed t n. W Moo � ;/re/m rr vv velar � Robert P. Ryt�'n hand N /edge ° 1 J/4 / P' u J a" drill DOM# A A vast `me 66 Page 173 --t+ur �- P Ori S , /^1fOued n t6 ObL'fwlbN 19, 196J ✓alum P O av1 l , h ✓a re - re nd Ls rs > _ 19 170.14" - se N66702o " ova -- � 16. 77'... - ass 274 v 20 196J O O Bu Roads , ql � Hn%yYlw� e�' li hNe 0./P22 O-m2r Nl!LbY66' a°R ► r jar Apra !9 9i il0 50635 W_ 1812 E -a-u•_ �O-/�eAe" wF �_ 5' 14..Jaq' 4 r /s 1 Pear a1 _-.. pal FwRood .-. _ 4 n� or o. nxa, -u'd �--_._�a3/ (>-be°J� s r>..- /-r 6l-°N�' RY_ �4 517, aWl 24J 56' R2 10,21,-- Kl>e.n�-dn- PA" �5 W Omni./ J. & Sandra Daniel a( & Leo ✓. ,A: _ " _ _ 6' -wYrade �cssi' Wit_. O/d Form O Briers OBrien Leo vyr_*s o-a=1s l OBnen T� o-aw / o-pt9 Map References v e, N,= - y e..,en l y> »sf of Ol. , ✓mi mood q'x4 . _ / LL tl Lab. set our,oq' ReWdm of PW-ty M. - Ch.Yee and VR# ie LYuck by H-A, Abbott ,f73-172 dotd gas -dear / Rye Pmperths - fk, Plot by F7h; of kky w W1j. 0227 dated Fe& y 1984 Pr °,,:: __ .may °/ o . toads e, r a/ ad Foy 4°oh Sgotembm 14, 1973 SYote a/ Y.-t' Right-of-Nby P/ono - lnduot ld Pork Rood, - &.ih 8uHI791- - StWo / iQeA�d F),d Plot - weW.",v Gros Cardanbbmo by fllzpatHat/Uerns/qrr ,pF60JO Nmch 1985 0ms6uc8m Mnrtrct M 5200(1) sheet 6 of 9 Whdldga Apatmmla - FkW Mat by 00b.1e all Khg WV510 dotal l"11979 T /� Kemedy LFNe 810 y P/ma - Rate of ✓ mart South Bu Yhgton P,opct D 5M-2(1) 54 Min of Lond of Pau/ and G/odp Heald' South 8,W t-. Yr bX Arthur Hoy B Assaaktea .LF.egen`* PMty F r s/w - Martha F/fasknms oral My ,%",H by Me EngkeerinD A�s I- Boundary Lhe Ad,Latmml belwean Dade/ and Smdo D6Na7 ad Stgab-A, Obrkn et. ol. by £KLstlnq power pale f77104 doted AprA 1977 Mats & Lmahy Cmwrfthg Enghews ,(9}114 dotal Mash Jq /999 Bamdy Sb y - Dm/W and Lao OZW- Jr.- 06r/en H e F by K ebe R Lmskg ebu obry Survey - Comb-y Pak Asxoetee by aW Engheeving Associotea eU81JJ dotx ,k/y 1976 -�- Survey Control Point C-atkg Eagh,- A4114 doled 9/19.96 O Calculated Comer-marlUmevltat%on Pkm Lmd - 0-and Alice Rym - Kennedy A,",, South �hgtm by mu C-fikg 57te Mm - Fkd Plot - Cardna .bade Ph-// by flt2potHtk/l/BwN/yn Wl 7 doted Obtobar 1984 to be set of ow w's dieetlon. of Engkxra, hc. O.WO ddd 1/1" 57te Re, - Georyetom Cmdmnhkma - Kennedy Orhe South Bull gtm VT by aw Enghea/ng 0 Iran Poo found fhd Mm - guskeas Pink North by C/uW Enghemhg Aesockles ,{7715f dated AID78 /y 1976 Aaerclotx dated,kugust ® DIN hale found Slob of ✓ Hint - Oga of H/p5w Re/ tkn of Nkesbmg Rood by 8oewd/ SLbd/vbva Wm - Oon/s/ O'Brkn and Leo ONr! .9:, 06-/ Hone F by Krebs &Lmeh9 EhgkawkD pro/ecl /-89-J(4)-J(4) ■ StdlelMntYete monument found Cmsdlhg £nDkreMs /94114 dared ,11181W 54B Aaea - MW of P/uopaW Cmsfmol6ar Ca, doted they 4 1967 by E , Abbet6 A Cdoufated Pont 9amdy Smsy W atm Hart o Jahn Osgood - Lots 5 and 11 Blrakress Pak NmM by ',.be R Lmshg Cmadting En9h- /97185 dried Oetobar 14 1997 Hon -and 1.0 kC' no manurnentatkal fo be Set m of P el are - Ou- and abk Brews - Ahp-I b/w South &,Ifttm by Hoog and FiW°Hy Srwy - Furman eo-d,- by H-11 AasxJ te.E In. Jdy 19M - Propefty lfbolvht of way ,xktx, 1- /4116 dared 0-116- 20, 1960 06Hm Lbothwa Ago X /nor - P party Lhae of Lmd wwat of HJ-0.V Rood by Fred d/fun Fm g of Paon a! Prgoerty of Gx 06rRn - N/nesMx�g Revd South BUHkgfon by fTwrop Koana- Febuy 1982 X /slln Ce att. &,. 1952 Bounv y Surey - Robert Rym at. d. (Whoing Brook) by Krebs h Lonshg C-ailing I gk,- /5016'2 date0 17/16/BO Survey__ Notes >. AIload borsrae .wrwry was cmwnh k „Gly 1995 Uehg _ Dote theodd 11 (Noel r-r aAr T77ee9) d m e-. dhtmae Dec. 0 Jl, 1997 meta- (aN-1 awtmme, 4r7ae) and o steel tope. August 24 1978 2 AK bemhge am c &.old and are refwance to aster M. Asbmamk nmlh woe detrmkrod Horn o sdm obew Mon Al -be, 22, 1977 0/ Me sues b J*W edge m September 12, /99D Ohsn h-e Noswnber 2Z, 1977 taYen or tines. poht 41 6, dglrlhg frosts. Poht &I.. Mogrerk norm b 16' 05' w6at of osNonamk north. 000ber 18, 1958 J lhb survey b sub{ t to the notes and l#NWA- OWA-Ied m thla Plot. Boundary N-otes _ 1. 7ha d-,*ekne -(,a ft the /omb'a. of the bounabrhe of the 1 d -%ry *d and the phyekr/ eNdenos located and edsthg oo the prarnd ,pooa srald and am/ymd to proWds bounday /ocotkns Mot ore most dknf/se of elm or/ynd htmst of th aaeda and b aymmnmt WM e11,t/ng mmumentoel- 2. This pbt of y abpkh bomdvy / thn of /ands undo -the Md. c/ 06rhn F ev Lhlhed Purina-W'p and F t Park Really a -& oM des tho /knit.¢ .beta k,oen, of entA lkmses mod ri;hte Mot may errn'Knba- m benefit the -.�ed premhen J 10--te hors 6- set h and m the ground xh- show+ m this plot of y .hero h bra gdn/o'r of l6e s -, It sae axes y to perpetuate o cYKnN oat athar a mmumxted A Any bounary /ke krnNm, basal m d-d m do-ts ---dad h the pubbi rxarda by of kh i/Ne m Nghra wre -.,pod to O%h F Wy Limited Pmthershp and F r Pink Really Caparolkn, m thy. m /Of, h fonds of O$rbn F Wy Lh iw PmMssh/p and F t Pak Redly Cop-flm M.,W- ddbeoted h sub)6ct to accuracy and MgdRy of thee. dead - doo,-tor. Hft- those dead m abcumarls ors hwq-t, executed as o matter of /ow m cmrob mrcrs a- amhe/s Al tbr4 tob m ins based upon mus/ane of low, they Me depicted bomdy 1-1kns may not s1, tell, 5. The boundary Me bcd/ma ebown ore d subhcl to occur y and lily m A -A of oath /ty of any g-ta- a- gent W. professed ' st - Wily to car X -W. m -o-'pvpmty a' r/ghte fed pr party 6. Any dpktkn m Mb pkt of y of bomdory /k- a- other lrueturee, ...tell. o/ bound y /has br O'Hrbn F Wy lAnRd Pmfne mhp aid Forest Pak Redly Cap-tlb, www /ocotod by laabxsnabye lbe /xofkn and dWklkn of bamd-y /hx oM- Mon thoee of 06rbw F Wy Linked Paineahp and F t Park Redly GWpavt/m m� not -ted and aY boundmy Mes dpkted err subject to the xarrxy and c W1.leneee of the publi rasa-d 7. MI, plot of y /s t the -4, use of O6Hx F ay Lhe'td Portna-mop and F eet Pak Realty Capaot/m and Me uee by other property -.Here Prate m-01,04 b peaNcaay urmuthod-d \ \ 5 /n ddrkn to thh sassy plot, o y oAetroct and su i rW -t le f- the Ihd yaw r- hchdee Me drrorrdopkd abet title Ww Me lands of 0 e F / L/m/Fad Pmof 88, all fwvst \ Pm* p Realty d other Me ahrmdagkd -Wo t N6� / obuttkg ? &,w Hqa and other d umanta and dsaa6 salad to Aky 20 1, a,d ♦ 7h, - r/ghls. -pre y t- t /r el & A.00 thrtwgh Noy 200r. 1-Or The surwyor'a report �ard to t. the the obdess mid t d oflon, pW and \ \ dYakrres ae-Y oWtrra t -d V -r as lof thialhbau�e of s \ ♦ ♦ \ ` T° \ \ Kennedy Orlve -- 6 of South Awu tl1, / WArme 66 Pove 467 Apo- 1, 1ISW velum. 66 Page 157 y24t 19, leaf ♦ \ "\ �`, 73 Pogo 15 „Wy 2; leas ♦ \ \ �\ Wt.Aen: 71 Page 16 Samuel er , 19 WAKne 7J Pogo 17 Sy tember 1, leaf p l�ioo /a / / 7• Ls s1 er u Lz of a ctcs � a� 117 l A4 JO , l 22Bq a/5z5 min �zss y7� aFRJ 80.36 Ro �lw 27>.50 oRs P (Formerly Airport Rood) - _ _ - - -• - - 1 / P-LM75 � RONPCIE � �. Don/el ✓. Q Lea at ah. Odell / a v,-e�aa, -�rver of srn,e „ne. 9r or yo�t,.. -:,t amvw Cerifica tion_ N61 surwv 1s based on physlcol eWtlence found 47 the Ae Ct and Aoformatlon abstracted from deeds and other perthent records and this survey Ls cons/stent with thot owdenm 7h/s plot conforms to 27 KSA. sect/on 14al Robert C. Krebs LLS. f517 Dote reur$ed of South f / B541nyton l vbA- 120 Pope 428 - / ,k/y 24 t977 / Merchants Bank ic35s---oi Dote S rve}'ed IgN-1 rc�° - Boundary Survey a`��ssN1111111� 6j1 Drawn £710 Checked NRl _. -... O �UF-ien Home Farm Scale t 100- _ OFR,,irn F:,lnily Idmilp(I PW-Itior: hip r KREBS Ke Date J ED, 2001 ana Forest Park Xcalty Corp. �roiry70 µ� g��sp� Project OOIB2 Old Farm Read uth BuWigton, V,monk XRERS & LANSINC Consulting engtneers, Inc. ° >B4 Wain Stree4 Co&-Aesteri Vermont 05446 I State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers PO Box 2184 So. Burlington, VT 05407-2184 Re: Rt. 116 & Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. O'Brien: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE 103 South Main Street, 10 South Waterbury, ury, Vermont 05671-0501 r,a Tel.: (802) 241-3700 TDD: 1-800-253-0191 Nongame & Natural Heritage Program 19 July 2001 __ Everett Marshall asked that I respond to your request for review of this project. A search of our - ---- database reveals no known occurrences of significant natural communities or rare, threatened, or endangered animals or plants at this site. For your information, our program has not conducted a field inventory of the site in response to your request. We request that the NNHP be kept current on any major changes or additions to the project design. Please contact me, or Everett Marshall (241-3715), if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jodi Shippee Fish & Wildlife Technician Tel: 802-241-3700 Email: jodi@fwd.anr.state.vt.us cc: Everett Marshall, Biologist/Data Manager Equal Opportunity Employer Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/Springfield/St. Johnsbury VERMONT FISH & WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT Barre District Office 324 North Main Street Barre, Vermont 05641 July 18, 2001 Mr. Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers, Inc. P.O. Box 2184 So. Burlington, VT 05407-2184 Re: Proposed Residential Subdivision, Route 116 & Kennedy Drive in South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Patrick: Based on the information you provided regarding the above referenced project the Department does not find any issues related to criterion 8(a) of Act 250 and necessary wildlife habitat. Given the rate and pattern of growth in this area however, and its concomitant effects on the area's natural heritage, I'm including a publication the Department put together recently to inform you of the consequences of how this part of Chittenden County is growing and developing. Respectfully, John M. Austin Wildlife Biologist Dept of Fish & Wildlife No Text } DENSITY CACULATION FOR ADJACENT PROJECTS* PROJECT # ACRES # UNITS UNITS PER ACRE Wellsley Grove 4.00 24 6.00 Georgetown 6.24 48 7.69 Windridge 2.04 17 8.33 Proposed 15.96** 103 6.45 *All information gathered from City Assessors Office. ** Excluding proposed R.O.W. (2.7 acres) Aug-17-01 04:04P Robert C. Krebs P.02 Ingypiry Consultinv-, Etv �q Lne Augum 17,210 Rny Fichir (-'ity of south i3liflington 575'Dor-c4el Stre.i,t Switli Burlini,,,tw-i, Vcrnx)nl: 05403 R F-: O'Bncn, fiorwDarin Dear IISN, f1w, 1-i'djowing, its i'i %Innrruuy oft.he iritiottriatiort you requestod in -rvg�wds to thu, above pri-)jccl 4) regkf'd-, tO 101 allocation, ,and L01 C'E;tVE.R.M.A.": lblal Arca.i 43 &rc� Area offluildinp: feet C"Overau e: ,.I o v 1;f " kv, C 285.424 qquwo feet 1%, covamgc: 14.9% Sl:-',W[,.R ALI,0C,.AIJON: L L, Li tlA r4 - ". 1! 1, 11- 1 tn! ti cI [I. ston.i.n.g "um (Irde Condo', 8 g � p d PqW 'Ni Lancastert,mv - MLIJI-IfIMil) 372 gpd MoM gp ------------- Qrs Amute ==Q, '113 Total Afloca-ficwu: 32,49-1 gpd fhebirchc+; vcfrred Co On thia hil-Ask-apin"', � pian MR be 8-10' PWWO COMM,'I U.1.3 if'y4MI haVeftil-th.cT C111e,;AiOn.'� Or corrlfl,wnl�, mc HT V `scow W. [-ImFacd Swil X&THM KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc, August 14, 2001 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: O'Brien Home Farm Development Dear Ray, 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 Fax (802) 878-9618 We are submitting revised plans, sheets 1 through 4, 4A, 5 and 8, for the O'Brien Home Farm. The revised plans are as a result of a reconfiguration of the Stonington Circle Condominium development and the "Pocket Park" identified as Lot 3. The following is a brief summary of the changes relating to the redesign of the Stonington Circle plans: Description Original Submittal Number of condominium units 45 units Lot coverage roads, parking, Lot 1 (Stonington Circle) 54,701 s.f. Lot coverage sidewalk/bikepath Lotl (Stonington Circle) 3,070 s.f Lot coverage buildings, Lot 1 (Stonington Circle) 60,391 s.f Percentage lot coverage Lot 1 (Stonington Circle) 31.9% Front yard coverage (Stonington Circle) 6.9% Area Lot 3 (Pocket Park) .25 acres Sewer allocation Lot 1 Stonington Circle Design flow plus infiltration 17,184 gpd On street parking spaces Lot 1 Stonington Circle 19 spaces Cost estimate Lot 1 (Stonington Circle) $4,050,000 Revised Submittal 47 units 48,359 s.f. 7,075 s.f. 63,940 s.f 32.6% 6.1% .35 acres 17,904 gpd 32 spaces $4,230,000 This summary shows the Stonington Circle resulted in the addition of two 3-bedroom condominium units, a 720 gpd increase in sewer allocation, .7% increase in total lot coverage and the addition of 13 on street parking spaces. The Pocket Park has been moved to the entrance of the project and increased in size from .25 acres to .36 acres. The landscaping plan has been revised to reflect the redesign of Stonington Circle. The estimated landscape cost for Stonington Circle is $58,310.00. We are requesting a variance from the front yard 30 foot setback for units 1, 20, 40, 41 and 47. We hope this information will allow you to evaluate the enclosed plans. Please feel free to call if you have any questions or comments regarding our submittal. Very truly yours, Michael J. Burke, P.E. MJB/dew 00182:beleirrevi6ow KREBS & LANSING tt CONSULTING ENGINEERS, ._.C. 164 Main Street COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 (802) 878-0375 FAX (802) 878-9618 TO WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints fans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ [LCE44121 HOC 4G�LaGJ�G�044L�� DATE JOB NO. U ATTENTION RE: ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION r THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval • Submit copies for distribution 1-7 Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPYTO-)f 4jj�,�f�1���f� 1611� SIGNED: ff enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. OMRI N U RO TH ERS A iflCY, he R E A L E S T A T E D s VE L O P M E N T A N1 J M A N A G E 41 1\ T FAX TRANSNIaSSION COVER SHEET FAX ##; FROM. - DATE, NUMER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED. (Including Cover Sheet) COMMENTS: U rL -4� r a� NOTE, This transmission contains privileged and confidential inforrnation intended only for the addressee named above, Ally use, dissemination or distribution by any person or entity other than the addresses is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify my office immediately by telephone and return the original transmission to rate at the above address. 1855 Williston Road • RO, Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2194 • (802) 658-5000 • f'ix 458-.5()02 e-mail: 08rien8rosC ao1.rom DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BQARD 10 JULY 2001 PAGE 2 c. Design Review Application #DR.01-08 of Teeson Real Estate to replace an internally illuminated freestanding sign with an externally illutinated freestanding sign that consists of two sign pane panel one is two fee by four feet in dimension and emps. Sign loys lgreen background with write lettering reading "Teesoan Real Estate." Sign Panel two is two foot by :fou.r foot in dimension and employs a white background with red lettering reading "Foulsharn Farms Real Estate," 365 .Dorset Street. d. design Revievv Application #DR-01-09 of Dorset Square Associates to append a previously approved 54,480 sq. ft. shopping center with four buildings. The amendment consists of installing a door and window on the north favade of the southern wing of the main building, 150 Dorset St. NO issues were raised on the Cbtisent Agenda. Mr. Farley moved to approve the Consent Agenda subject to the stipulations i Adlninistrator's memo of 6 July. Mr. Cameron seconded. Motion passed in the unanirrnously. .° oublic Hearing: FrelipuinAry Plat Application #S.D-41.-34 of Daniel & Lee O'Brien, D,BA Forest Park Realty Corp. and The O'Brien Family Limiters Partnership for a 1.01 unit ,planned residential development and a six lot subdivision, Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive: Mh Dinklage noted that the Board received a letter from. Torn Crowley, President of Georgetown .H0trae0-"mer3' Associatior, indicating that they had agreed on a chain link - fence. A letter was also received from. Mark R&ll representing Wellesley Condominium Associatiorn asking for time to do a traffic study and sto.miwater su received a traffic stud}, done by tl>e applicant. rvey. The Board also Patrick O'Brien then presented the plan_ He said the, proposal is to subdivide the property into 6 lots. Lot # I would be 8_ 1. acres and would contaitt the Storurtgton Circle town homes. Lc�t #2 would he 5.:3 acres and would consist of'the ,Lancaster Lane apartment buildings. Lots 3 & 4 v,ould retrain open and would be given to the city for recreation purposes. The remaining Parcels would be left in theif natural state. Mr. ()'.Brien indicated a future potential conrectio , to Old Farm Road, Mr. Belau noted this is on the of�c.al city map. Mr. O'Brien noted that the ma.ximurn allowable density is� 111. "They propose i 0 1 units. DEVELOPME4W REVIEW BOARD 10 JULY 2001 PAGE 3 Mr. Dickinson then addressed traffic. Ile said that Traffic lvould access onto both Hinesburg Rd. and Kennedy Drive- Trip generation was calcuiated on the basis of the town houses being single family houses and the apartments being condos, The estimate for AM peak hour trip ends is 66 and for PM peak hour trip ends is 90. Mr. Dickinson said they estimate that 73%cif the cars will go via Hinesburg Rd; 27% would go via K.enz;edy Dr. The Kennedy Dr, access would be limited to right turns only both in and out. By adding the proposed trips to the Hayes Ave. intersection, the level of service would be at ` C" . With today's conditions, the Kennedy Dr.I'Hitzesburg Rd. intersection would be at level of service "E." With the proposed improvements, it would go to "D." Mr. Dickinson said they feel this project wotdd have a rniniirial impact on level of service. - Mr. Dickinson then outlined sortie reconunendatiozis to mitigate the added traffic: L incorporate a median on Kennedy Dr. to prevezrt left turnmovements b. add a left turn lane on Hinesburg Rd, for soutlAx)und tratric eTntCring this project ;9 c. make sidewalk and Dike path connections (:Mr. O'Brien noted there will be an 4Y 3 ft. bike path in this community and showed the route). .. Ms. Weiner noted the city has traffic calming plans ibr the Old Farm Rd. area and asked how much traffic from this development would be turning south. Mr. Diekizison estimated about 2-3%, Ms. Barnard of Wellesley, GrOVe said that even now turning left onto Hayes Ave. is a problem. She asked if that c&n be incorporated as part of this project. Mr_ .Dickinson said they probably would do that and make it svcrunetr_ical. The applicant indicated they would do this. Ms. Barnard noted that Wellesley Grove has hired a traffic consultant and would like to have this hearing continued to aI Iow review of that study. Mr. Young asked for a diagram of what the intersection would look like. Mr•. Dickson said that is not now available. Mr. Dinklage said that would be discussed in detail at Final Plat. Mr. Hiltz asked if more cut through traffic to Hinesburg R.d- i anticipated.. Nir. Dicki.ilson said the design would discourage this as would change of grade. Mrs. Maher asked what the median would look I&e. Mr.'Dickinson, said it would he a curbed island and would be done by the firm doing the Kennedy Dr. improvements. DEVELOPMENT' REVIFW BOARD I 0 JULY 2001 ?AGE 4 Ms. Von Olsen asked about school buses and delivery trucks. ,Mr. Dickinson said the streets would be city streets bailt to city standards Ms. Wright asked if the median would have an impact on Georgetown. Mr. Dickinson said it would not. Ms. Wright said the proposed future read includes blocking of} the end of Old Tartu Rd. She asked what will happen to cut -through traffic at that time, Mr. Dickinson said that . not part of this project and was is not analyzed. %4.r. (Brien said the design of the road does take into consideration the grade of Old Farm Rd. itiir- Sporzynski said an. 8 foot bike pat,'j has been asked for. He said the Bake Path Committee would.much rather see the bike path on the east side of the street and would prefer a 10 ft.. path, Mr. Dinklage noted that the city Vvcrt I have to complete the tinic. between the 2 ends of the bike path. 'Ms. Wright was cor1(TrnF.A that there isn't that much prc�ert at Oeozgetp for tin S' ft-pathfr: I�iriic dial with lag� saw Ek`e Rcierc! would eventually that. The aim is to get bike traffic to the traffic light so they can cross safely. Mr. Kupferman asked about the semi-eirrula; road. Mr. O'. tien said that is to connect to potential future development: Mr. Kupferma�i was cor,cez�ed vtnith building a road behind Georgetown that Cieorgetawn has no access to and having a road that serves only like.a'sall group of fames, fie said he would like to see what the whole area would look like. Mr. O'Brien indicated that they will contribute 2 small Open space parks. Mr. Dinklzee questioned whether the city wants the parks and who would be responsible for v maintenance. A member of the audience asked about access u'7 the open space lot behizrd Lancaster Lane. Mx. O'Brien said the intent is to have an ama that will stay in its natural state. It would be :For walking. etc. This land goes all the way to the bike path. There is also an easement that goes to the park. There would be a footpath, city could do with it as it wishes_ maybe a few benches The Mr..Scl=itt asked about potential future build -out. Mr- Dink age said t1 at is not pan of this proposal. Mr. Kupferman noted the open space is a class e wetland and asked what Kind of use` Open space piece could have. Mr. O'Brien said it would be basical]y a natural area T e use would be up to t;.e city, Ms, Yankowski said there „could be a lot of buildings; people and traff%a and she didn't see a way for a6y 'MIdlifc to get between the 2 wetland pieces. DEVELOPIv1ENT REVIEW BOARD 10 JULY 2001 PAGE 5 Ms. Yankowski also asked where the water would Po .hat won't go into the vvetlaiZds or into Potash Brook. Mr, O'Brien said they would have a presentation on that. Mr. O'Brien said they estimate the project will generate i I sohool-age children and have submitted this number to the School Board, The Homeowners Association would omm and maintain the retention ponds. Mr, Dinklage said the city is undertaking an initiative to ensure that regular maintenance s being dons, to these facilities. Mr. O'Brien noted that there ,,vould be no dumpstcrs in the Stonington Circle- In the other area, dumpsters would be enclosed in structures. Mr. Dinklage asked about the adequacy of parking for the condo area. He noted there are problems elsewhere in the city and that the applicant is asking for a parking wai%-er. Mr. 'JirtklaEe suggested that the required, number of spaces might not be enough. Mr. O'Brien said they had miscalculated.in their submittal. In Stonington Circle, parking is adequate, In .Lancaster, they had left out the underground parking in garages. There are-.uow 2 spaces per unit plus one for every 4 units as visitor parking. Mr. (:O'Brien showed tha area for visitor parking. Mr. DLiklage noted that in many rental units there are as many as 4 cars per unit with 4 working adults living in the units. This creates a problem .for the city, Ms. Gorazum asked if 4 cars per unit doesn't also affect traffic. ,!fir. DirWage said it does. Mr. O'Brien then, enumerated the waivers they are seeking. a. setbacks for front yard on Lancaster Lane b. setback on Stonington Circle for building -1 I c. eliminate the require. -rent for a place to store recreational vehicles Ms. Wright asked about the appearance of the buildings. Mr. O'Brien said they would be similar in st;le to Wellesley Croce u'itll the exception of walkout basements. Thev would be in the i 90,000 price range. Mr. Dinklage said the Board wants a commitment that what is shown at final plat is wilat is acilally built. Ms, Yankatuski said that in light of the request fof setback waivers, it sounds as if there are too many buildings proposed. She said if there were fewer buildings, there could be more parking. DF,VELOP.MT T REVTIEWBOARD 10 JULY 2001 PAGE 6 Mr. O'Brien also rioted they are asking for a height waiver for the 12-plexes cn Lancaster. "There would be 3 stories above and Z below grader similar to the Chatham Grove buildings. Mr. Ainklage asked why a waiver is needed. a\Ir. O'Brien, said they worked on R-plexes but couldn't get under ground parking, and 12-plexes use up less land. The waiver would be for up to 45 ft. (5 ft. waiver). Mr. Boyle then showed the contryuxs Of the ,area ;and the building concepts for the condos. He indicated the existing treeline ;nnd the trecline that would exist berm would 60 Created ro be sate after constriction. Awater does {lot leave the property. 11%ir. Boyle then reviewed planting including screening of parked cars so light from headlights does riot leave the property. Mr. Hiltz questioned whether pines would thin out in time. Mr. Boyle said they could use spruce. MT. 13i�ard askecfaboui a Dam tiie arkirt� "`__- _ _..s . standard that requires light not to leave the rah lot. Mr. I?trkxage said there is a city Pgles in the project aria 24 ft. light poles on�hestreet.h� Boyle said t1?ere would be 20 ft.. N r. Boyle indicated they will consider something other th n. lindens for the street trees. Ms. Wright asked about protecting wildlife_ Mr. O'Brien said that before final plat and the state pernai.t process, they will address endangered animal and plant species. Ocher animals will get along with people. A member of the audience asked why the city would u,arit to atvn a piece of wetland, He noted that it would not be usable and the applicant would not have to pay taxes on dit. He Dinklage said it is possible this area could be expanded when other pieces of contiguous land a:e developed_ He said the city has indicated they would like to receive this land. Mr. Boucher s,_aggested inalcing two of the g.pleaes into a 12-piex and eliminating one building. Mr. O'Brien said they want a variety of building options, Mr. Burke then Presented a. stormwater plan. He indicated. that Wellesley Grove has hired a cousuita.nt but no cornments have been received vet. Soils range from ledge to stony loam to sand, Slopes ga from shallow to steep. There are also 5 sub -watersheds on the property. Mr. Burke indicated their analysis was for a 25- year, 24-hour storm. He then showed the discharge points and how water would be redistributed through pipes, swales, etc. He said that water would not run directiy from pavement untreated into the wetland. The run-off rate in all relcva.nt locatiori.s would be reduced, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 10 JULY 2001 PAGE 7 Mr. Dinklage .said. the application would be continued so staff can review new information just received. Mr. Boucher moved to co.rtinuee the application until 21 August. Mr. Sch"iia seconded. Motion passed unanimously. S. Public Hearing: Final plat application #80-01-33 of Homestead Design, Inc., to amend a planned residential development cozAbting of 2:96 residential units and an 18-hole golf course, Dorset St. The amendment consists of ,minor modifications to decks, ,grading, buildings, etc., for the Glen. Eagles project, Park Road: Mr. Nedde showed 2 versions of the final plat. He said the changes are housekeeping issues. There had been a cedar hedge proposed as a buffer to city -owned wooded area_ The applicant aow proposes a cedar 2-rail lexioe. There will be stairs �adinh cldeck sf -- -" Unit 20. The' decks 6rf 2 Cutts will be eiilar "ed. There will, be minor g g . Mr. Belair said staff had no issues. Mr. Cameron moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-01-33 of Homestead Design, Inc., subject to the stipulations in draft motion dated 10 July 2091. Mr. Schmitt seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Public blearing: Application #CV-01-25 of Qingbin & Yan Wang seeking approval under Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, and Section. 26.75, Accessory Residential Units, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to have a 622 sq. ft. accessory residential unit. 72 East 'ferrate: Mr. Wang said last year they got permission to build the addition. It will be used as a residence for parents. He said they did not know they needed an additional permit for this use" Mr. Schmitt moved to approve Application #CU-01-25 of Qingbin & Farr Wang subject to the stipulations in the draft motion dated 10 July 20di.. Mr Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Public Hearing: application. #CU-01-21 of Craig and Gail Spain seeking conditional use approval under Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, and Section 26.75, Accessory Residential Units, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request ig for permbsion to con'struct a 512 sq. ft: accessory residential unit, 1 Woodside Drive; Ne�efia Nattm j / 1 1 1 / /(J1 ! 1 /I 0 / C I 1 I sl a Ane,awnare ma&thg 12'A.G l .atMhe Q Nee dron f sloom a wave New Sub Rsn •i.T L77 Inv. !O J19.9 Inv. out J19 15'AIAS-Nt1 f Naw CB Rim 32375 /n v. J21.9 al I Rkn ?.75 I Inv. in 1 In. out 3.B,i I' / .5J--, / 1 t ` SOB ' 4" PW ! dw I. pokrMw77t4c Lh d curb 'J I f m Inv�g JJ/d4 New -Wh Y Rim J32.9 --'New OMh Prmpo-"d Pbrk Aron Inv. h 322.49 1 Rkn J29.0 Inv out J22,J9 Inv. J23 4 r _ -. _.._ N•w CB New ! 11j-& tt T Rim J32.-J6 ., J2818 `' assembly _.__. ud J284J + Nw rNnourl ��.JCS ' M. JM4 w• yo I � °c% Rhr-,iJy_36 � �_ .. /n v, ud 32823 s=o oas \ \ Rk" JJJ 52 New CB \ \ \ \ \ \ New Out/et Inv. In J21.5J Inv, out J21.4J Bkn 334.2 \ \ structure New End Section \ \ /nv 324, 25 /nv 124.1 \ \ Stormwoter \ \ Detentim/Tisotmenl � \ \ Basin 63 - - - - A,W- R),4."y Lhe - •w- - 8�+t - Erlrthp tlbter Lme/gst► lalw _112 -IK- - 1Fw- p rapased Mbtav Lkos/gate edlr /WY-X`%Vl E *av t- /he ryyy-yyyyyyyr asalnp 1,0"Its Sewer Lhe/mmhde o proposed Sewn Lhe/ma we p £rlsthp State "VICatcn boa6, SST T'T-t} p -posed - -I"tch bosh M'. Rgeossd -dsrdrah T -� y- Frbthg Cmt- p Pfvp-.d cxwto IN New Yard Lbok1 Rim JJ2 5 Inv J27.0 New CB- R!m JJ2.65 Inv J2575 Now pet. \ wl• Nsw /'k copper water eerrtr and n.. auD stop (ba.)- New CS Rim JJ8.9 R!m \ ' \ o ,, I' New CB \ Rim J31. 50 '_ I \ New CB °+ Inv. 327.35 I I Rim JJ9.0 Inv. JJ275 New SNh _ RIM 371.59 - ; (' Inv. ud MJIC7 � lnv. In 326&92 / �/nv, ' out J16.12 Nw )2" New \ .. �- •.44R @ 1 sw2tXli\hrdremb/ �OBs r R Rim 3Jm M,99.. 50 Inv. in JJ38J Inv. out JJJ.7J New 1'k V d c., a stop (OP.) New,2.3 Rh? 59 In.m 44.9 km out J44,8 Now CB `03 Rkn 59.0 ��" Inv ud4354.45 he rant New CB Rim J28.8 lnv. J24.9 /nv. ud J25.15 New CB Rkn J28.8 Inv. 124.7 Inv. d 324.95 I New CB Rim J49.7 /nv. J44.15 /nv, ud J444 - ' ew CB Rim J62.5 Inv. J57.5 / Inv ud 357..75 / New CB Rkn 362.4 Inv. 357.8 Inv ud J5305 NOW Wr Rh1 J6,1 75 / Inv. In 57.6 ?V" 6' At. a 52 wn!• Nw B' a 52 . New CB Rim JJ9.0 /n u. J3300 Inv. ud JJ325 New tee and gate vi W/M New CB Rirn J50.3 In. 34525 Inv. ud 345.5 rD,Whng pawn pd. Notes.• August 20 2001 d-Aewo�e, w t. - B/70I APtey Con&al Pont August A 2001 bu//dhg4 grading, looting d k, .line 4, 2001 w V- contra/ -d bash mp B/9/b1 e 4 1 Er/sung h�oFaK 1. fie locotion and motenols o/ exlsthg �•Mltles Is nat war ted to be exact ar complete. rho Contractor sho// Re/d totals ap FOR PERMIT REVIEW ate �` -d a.•a16tk» �.c�d °etc Prapased hjd-t utA'/t/es and be solely respaoslble /a a// exlstAtg utaltles atd thek• unht•vntpted fie Demgn M"B �t///tV P/an - Stoninnton Circle p14-d -16 st ga services. Contractor sha'1 contoct Dig So% be%re Drawn tL/P/SNH J y Conente monument PCID setback eanma70hg any waft. /ton Poe .- Prgeosed powW roads/pa'*k,g 2. Tths plat !s h no way a boundary survey. ° �O Bo' 1v' 9eo' Scale Checked 1' 30 A O Brien Home Farm FbIM p'ode ;pot Newthn Prgoosed sedewkk/bake pain Date uor 1 2oa •90 �o m- �*M Btotbg ak j, T ` t . a BrQ p SCi�(� Pro t 00182 t:Yd Form Rood South Budln cn Yevma ��BS & I.d"IM Consulting Engineers,. Inc, .. L.yr Parr 164( Alain Stree4 Co%hester, Pemwnt 49"46 w Bask - d��*''^ �i�'/ / -1 11 ! . - N*+txt� �"'�Y�_ i* 6' ..-c.. [ a�,dtq yid-- octal �^ v f / 'o + 1� i' /� \ / WO.Wl-tkH. .. l /MCI pWkl'1 OrIXH(/ ' _� August 24 2001 d »nA -11. mA e/20/01 lVOt69.e Au t g. 2a01 bueuYq; �ad(g oabhg d A mA B/9/b1 Apprac Agony Lk• ,� r.Istkg P.— a y ,.-, f, 2001 eroakw control around boeeh _ m VIM, 1 e-- — 9�r— £xlsthg *ter Ch lgat• W W. _I 12 Checked Dole Swwy Control Point Hoybob woeon control Dote roW W DescrDtl _i— _ P+W_ ,tt, t;,e,�,te cw r. fie *exactlocat1w and nopeta o/eClwtrst1bg uor sys / not wc,�fed FOR PERMIT REVIEW � �sNn9 yd'ant to be exact orcamp/efs The Controctcr sho// fis/d /coots ON / Y-V- YY Eklethg troe Ike A'opored k/d—t r am_ Sit fence wor/on control ut6ltier and be sdety respmstb/e hr off exfst#lg ufdittes and DQ6�9n M� Grading d� Erosion Contra/ Plan-Stonington Circle rwvrvvvrvm pearktt tinits thek unkterrvpted s Wces. fie cone actor ,sba// contact Dig Drawn FAfP/Sit%/ Prgoa•ed nub s&P PUD setback Safe befors commenckg ony work. Checked — — d--@- £dathg Sl— Cke/mannda p Cmcrote monument �s$�— Proposed Serer Lk»/marnde o /rcvr p{oa -'-,�' / 2. firs p/an is k no way o boundary . ,wy.. o' .w' eo' 1p' 1�' Scale I. = 30' _ �r�_,� ba _ PAP_ P o Brien Home Farm Ambagu gor Date kler 2co1 AVposod stun, CA -/catch book 337,5 Fhuh yrow spat r canon 1 n ate+ /bA» P BAR - iv— PrapasM undwaVak A- ��a— BA SCALE r' = JO' Pro ct OOIB2 poi Form Rood SoutA Burik fcvh YermarP �t �ed,c�arkg awn XR�'9S &� LJNSI.�YG Consulting �'ngeneer� !n� ;r._ 4 ................._.......... --_ psaea.ed rb , >ew' in Street Colchester, Pernaont Of"6 a N yQs PLANWe SD'JM"-Stonitytan L*de Key A)P" AMr. PLANT NAW b)'2r Unit oast $ rota l 1 46 Red pine 8-10' 150 $900 ? 13 Spruce 8-10' 200 2600 ^ 3 14 Shab 8-10' 150 2100 4 i2 crabapple 3" 175 5600 5 12 B/ue spruces 10-12' 300 6600 6 20 .Sdumnor oa&s 2112-1 220 4400 7 11 Arboratoe cedars 10-12' 150 1B00 ® B 30 sea green „Ln#ws i 1 gol. 35 1050 g 15 See londscaping note /B-24' 350 5JO0 0 Landscaping Notes.• 1 Each buildbig is olloted a lardscaptng budget of AM..W. A4 lcadscyotng will include: sea green *ng'oex arthary waterer spiv2 burnng bush hydangeo, mlgho ptna spiv wn haute, ro ieg and dogwood. 2. For tmdscophg along Hayes Avenue see Master Londscophg Plno by ra Boyte. mile if ~ total Clea-mg traits mi r R • �- yr �� p� �. s y � FOR PERMIT REVIEW 0' JO' 60' 721r 180` BAR SCALE August 20, 2001 August 9, 2007 c ra w,ns a°adk,gs grodk 7 Desarbtl°n Checked I Dote P,satt Landscaping Plan — Stoningion Circle SO "- 3°' 10 Brien Hom e Farm Dots wer 1• zv� �X�BS d• IdNSIrY6 ConBultinq c�ngmeer� InG _- 4fi A 1&4 Vain Street Colchester, Vermont O.S446 CCMPO Communities working together to meet Chittenden County's transportation needs CHITTENDEN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 100 Dorset Street, Suite 22, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 (802) 660-4071 / (802) 660-4079 Fax www.ccmpo.org / info@ccmpo.org MEMORANDUM August 21, 2001 Member Jurisdictions To: Sarah MacCallum, City of South Burlington Dept of Planning and Zoning Bolton Burlington Charlotte Colchester Essex Junction From: David Roberts, Transportation PlannefW Re: O'Brien Home Farm PUD Traffic Impact Study Review Cc: Joseph Segale, CCMPO Senior Transportation Planner Essex Town Hinesburg I have reviewed the O'Brien Farm PUD Traffic Impact Study. The study includes all Huntington of the state -required summary diagrams and analyses, including Level of Service Jericho analyses of intersections Milton Richmond Table 3 on page 5 of the study includes a summary of the vehicle delays at the St. George Kennedy Dr / Hinesburg Rd intersection for the various scenarios examined. The Shelburne planned Kennedy Drive reconstruction will widen the roadway and increase the South Burlington capacity there. If for some reason this reconstruction did not take place, the additional Underhill delays introduced by the project might be reason for concern. In the case of one Westford direction (Hinesburg Rd northbound), the delays were projected to increase by 147 Williston seconds, or over 2 minutes of additional delay. However, the Kennedy Dr project is Winooski moving forward and the assumption that this work will be complete appears valid at Vermont Agency of Transportation this time. With the additional capacity available from the reconstruction, the delays generally increased by only 2-3 seconds for each direction with the O'Brien Farm Ex Officio Members development impacts factored in. Chittenden County Transportation Authority One issue to double check is the projected queue lengths at the intersections and the Burlington length of any dedicated left and right turn lanes. If the line of vehicles at an International Airport intersection goes beyond the length of the turning lanes, then the delays for the turning Regional Planning Commission movements could be affected. The Signal 2000 software used in the level of service Rail Industry analysis does not take this into account when computing delays. The northbound U.S. Department of approach of Hinesburg Rd at the Kennedy Drive intersection is projected to back up Transportation 629 feet according to the queue model in the Signal 2000 software. This is still not close to the approximate 1200' foot distance to the Hayes Ave intersection, but could mean greater delays for turning vehicles on that approach. The location of the development within the traffic overlay district of the South Burlington zoning ordinance should be noted. It appears the projected PM Peak hour trip ends fall well below the limits established for the overlay district, but this issue should be examined in more detail as the proposal moves forward. C1_­MPO O'Brien Farm PUD 8/21/2001 Page 2 of 2 Traffic Impact Study Review The traffic impact study concludes with three specific roadway capacity increases the development should provide to mitigate the traffic impacts: 1. Exclusive left turn lanes should be constructed on Hinesburg Rd at Hayes Avenue. 2. The Kennedy Dr access should be configured for right -turn only movements. 3. There should be a median on Kennedy Dr at the access point to prevent unauthorized left - turn movements. The study does not make it clear how these measures would be implemented — would the developer take responsibility, or would the City be required to fund the design and construction of these projects? The traffic impact study does not discuss the potential of cut -through traffic using Hayes avenue to circumvent the Hinesburg Rd / Kennedy Dr intersection. This would be very difficult to forecast, but the possibility of this occurring certainly exists. This issue could be addressed in part with traffic calming measures along Hayes avenue to discourage fast-moving vehicles in search of short-cuts. The study does not examine issues related to bicycle or pedestrian travel or public transportation, aside from stating there will be a path parallel to Hayes Ave through the development. While these issues are often not included in traffic impact studies, the CCMPO does encourage new developments to provide the means to access a variety of modes of transportation. CCTA provides service along Hinesburg Rd and Kennedy Dr and the development could provide facilities for residents to access the public transportation system, such as sidewalks out of the development to Kennedy Dr and Hinesburg Rd and additional shelters for riders at these locations. Other Bicycle, pedestrian, or public transportation concerns could be addressed as the development plan moves forward. In summary, the O'Brien Farm Development generates a relatively small impact on the regional transportation system. However, the additional traffic generated does add to the incremental impacts of all the ongoing developments in the area. When taken together these developments can cause increased traffic congestion when development impacts are not mitigated with access to alternative modes of travel or more substantial increases in roadway capacity. The traffic impact fee ordinance enacted by South Burlington addresses this issue, but the impact fee may not anticipate all of the future needs of the transportation system in South Burlington. For this reason, it is important to continuously refine the vision for future transportation opportunities in the City of South Burlington. State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wldlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800.253-0191 TDD>Voioe 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD Margaret Picard, City Clerk City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Draft Stormwater Discharge Permit 91-1520 Dear Ills. Picard, .(L O*trt n (ut eu*w At P%x ) AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 South Main Street Building 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 FAX 802-241-3287 TEL 802-241-3771) December 5, 2001 Enclosed are two copies of the Public Notice for the comment period for the Discharge Permit proposed for issuance to Daniel and Leo O'Brien, Jr.. The Discharge Permit will authorize the discharge of stormwater runoff from the proposed O'Brien Home farm residential subdivision located off of Route 116, and Kennedy Drive, in South Burlington to Potash Brook. We respectfully request that a copy of the Public Notice be posted in the Town Offices. The other copy is for your local officials. We are also sending copies of these notices to other local officials and interested persons who have asked to be included on our mailing list. We will be glad to send you additional copies if you desire or add names of interested parties to our mailing list. Sincerely, Stephanie Lanphear Administrative Stormwater Management Section 7losures (3 ) Board of Selectman (w/enclosure) 01 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408 NOTICE: DRAFT DISCHARGE PERMIT PUBLIC NOTICE NUMBER: 1-1520 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: December 6, 2001-January 5, 2001 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAME: Daniel and Leo O'Brien, Jr. PERMITTEE ADDRESS: PO Box 2184, South Burlin�-ton, VT 05403 PERMIT NUMBER: 1-1520 FILE NUMBER: 04-14 PROJECT ID NUMBER: EJ01-0257 DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated stormwater VOLUME: As necessary RECEIVING WATER: Potash Brook EXPIRATION DATE: December 31, 2006 DESCRIPTION: This is a draft discharge permit proposed for issuance to Daniel and Leo O'Brien, Jr. for the discharge of stormwater runoff from the proposed O'Brien Home farm residential subdivision located off of Route 116, and Kennedy Drive, in South Burlington Vermont to Potash Brook. The means of treatment includes overland flow, grassed swales, and detention basins. -2- TENTATIVE DETERMINATIONS Tentative determinations regarding effluent limitations and other conditions to be imposed on the pending Vermont permit have been made by the State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources (VANR). The limitations imposed will assure that the Vermont Water Quality Standards and applicable provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act, PL 92-500, as amended, will be met. FURTHER INFORMATION The complete application, proposed permit, and other information are on file and may be inspected at the VANR, Waterbury Office. Copies, obtained by calling (802) 241-3770, will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS Written public comments on the proposed permit are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) January 5, 2001 to the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408. Comments may also be faxed to 802-241-3287. The permit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any submitted comments. All comments received by the above date will be considered in formulation of the final determinations. During the notice period, any person may submit a written request to this office for a public hearing to consider the proposed permit. The request must state the interest of the party filing such request and the reasons why a hearing is warranted. A hearing will be held if there is a significant public interest (including the filing of requests or petitions for such hearing) in holding such a hearing. FINAL ACTION/APPEAL At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final detennination to issue or to deny the permit. Any person may, within thirty (30) days after permit issuance or denial, appeal the VANR determination to the Vermont Water Resources Board pursuant to Title 10 V.S.A., Chapter 47, subchapter 1269. Christopher Recchia, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation �►s�r F+�urns I7r .;� State of Vermont AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Telephone #(802) 879-5656 December 5, 2001 Skip McClellan Llewellyn -Howley, Inc. 4049 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. McClellan: Subject: As built sewer plan for MBL Associates, South Burlington, Vermont. We have reviewed the materials submitted and notified you via phone on November 20, 2001 that a complete application package and fee were needed for the Amendment. Unfortunately, as of the date of this letter we have not received any of the requested materials and fee. Once you have the missing or incomplete information, please send the materials to this office. Once we have determined that the application materials are complete, the application will be accepted and will be assigned to one of the engineers to be reviewed. ncerely, rene L. Roberge DEC Regional Office Coordinator Enclosure -copy of application form and checklist copies: South Burlington Llewellyn -Howley 8/21/01 MOTION OF APPROVAL FOREST PARK REALTY CORP. & THE O'BRIEN FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve preliminary plat application #SD-01-34 of Daniel & Leo O'Brien, DBA Forest Park Realty Corp. and The O'Brien Family Limited Partnership for a 103 unit planned residential development and a six(6) lot subdivision, Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive, as depicted on a 22 page set of plans, page #2 entitled, "Boundary Survey O'Brien Home Farm O'Brien Family Partnership and Forest Park Realty Corp. Old Farm Road South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated June 20, 2001, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2, Prior to issuance of zoning permit for the first lot or start of utility or road construction, .all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for the proposed public roads, city park, and utility, sewer, drainage, water and recreation path, etc.) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 3. Prior to start of construction of the improvements described in condition #2 above, the applicant shall post a bond which covers the cost of said improvements. 4. In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., roads, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc.) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer, "as -built" construction drawings certified by a licensed engineer. S.The plans shall be revised prior to final plat submittal as follows: a. The plat plans shall be revised to include a different name for the proposed "Hayes Avenue" street name. b. The plat plans shall include information on the base flood elevation for this property. C. The plat plans shall be x vised.t inc as the size e street tre s 2 5" ali rJ ands ing ule 'shall evi to s rate e str�rees f thevsite 1 ndsc ng. d. T e pla an�sh �ers=ret��� Be ropose ps s wh'hal e. Theplat plans shall be revised to provide bike racks throughout the project. f. The plat plans shall be revised to provide three (3) additional handicapped spaces. g. Z4lat pj ans- 9'k sb 1r s ecatiorial ve idles . h. The plat plans shall be revised to illustrate the parking spaces for all covered parking areas. i. The plat plans shall be revised to note the size of the dwelling units and the height of the buildings from average pre -construction grade. j. The plat plans shall be revised to show mailbox clusters if proposed. These clusters shall be located outside of the proposed city street right-of-way. k. The plat plans shall be revised to incorporate the recommendations of the City Arborist. 1. p p ansish 11 b vised ow a rafi sl at Ke e Dr i e.inters ct. n se ack f om the road t 2) fe m. The plat plans shall be revised to show drains to the basements, if basements are proposed E n.The plat plans shall include E911 street addresses for the entire development. 6. The Development Review Board approves a sewer allocation of 32,493 g.p.d. The sewer allocation shall remain in affect for ten (10) years from the date of the final plat approval. Any buildings which have not been permitted within ten (10) years shall lose their allocation unless reapproved by the Development Review Board. The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. 7.All the multi -family residential buildin s shall be k sprinklered. �� �_ e! i !11 - Wr� 3. No structures shall be permitted in the PUD setback area provided in Section 26.154 (d) of -,':he zoning regulations unless approved as part of this development and shown on the approved plans. 9.The developer/homeowner's association shall be responsible for maintenance of the retention basins. 10.Pursuant to Section 401.1 (k) (b) (3) of the subdivision regulations, the Board waives Section 401.1 (k) (b) (2) of the subdivision regulations and allows the two (2) private streets to have more than 20 units. It is the Board's opinion that these streets would improve traffic safety conditions and not adversely affect the public good and welfare of the community. ll.Pursuant to Section 10.404 of the zoning regulations, the Board modifies the front yard setback requirements for units#1,20,39,40,41,42,43,47 and at 19, 79 and 80 Lancaster Lane as shown on the approved plan. 12.The final plat submittal shall include the wattage and type for all proposed exterior lighting. 3 13.The applicant shall complete the following traffic mitigation improvements prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit: 1) construct left -turn lanes on Hinesburg Road at Hayes Avenue to serve the project, 2) the Kennedy Drive access be configured for right -turn movements only, and 3) a median be provided on Kennedy Drive to prevent unauthorized left -turn movements. 14.Pursuant to Section 26.256 (b) of the zoning regulations, the Board approves 93 spaces on the lot #2 which is a 33 space or 26% shortfall. 15.The homeowner's association documents shall prohibit the conversion of garage spaces to living spaces. 16.The final plat application shall be submitted within 12 months. 4 DENSITY CACULATION FOR ADJACENT PROJECTS* PROJECT # ACRES # UNITS UNITS PER ACRE Wellsley Grove 4.00 24 6.00 Georgetown 6.24 48 7.69 Windridge 2.04 17 8.33 Proposed 15.96** 103 6.45 *All information gathered from City Assessors Office. ** Excluding proposed R.O.W. (2.7 acres) 1�_91 TUB 10: 30 Y:3.-i 307 ',9U 40T9 GG3Y0 I C071,T L:nr!12S W0.'><17 y^ tO�CEtn?f t0 Meet Citte Rdcn t'0nsp O.tdi0r? needs M P ® CNITTENDEN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 100 Dorset 5.r=_ei, Suite 22, South Burling xn, Uerrcrt 05403 (8C2) 660.4071 / (802) EEO-4C79 rox WWV%.ccmpo.crg / info2ccmpo.org MEMORANDUM August 21, 2001 Member Jt risdi6ors To: Sarah MacCallum, City of South Burlington Dept of Planning and Zoning Bolmn From: David Roberts, Transportation Plannef Bur i ngtcn Cherlotte Re: O'Brien Home Farm PUD Traffic impact Study Review rald,esle, Cc: Joseph Segale, CCMPO Senior Transportation Planner _ss°x Jun -ton Fssex Tewn Hineiburg I have reviewed the O'Brien Farm PUD Traffic Impact Study. The study includes all iiunorgtcn of the state -required summary diagrams and analyses, including Level of Service Jericho analyses of intersections Mikn Richmond Table 3 on page 5 of the study includes a summary of the vehicle delays at the St. Ceorge Kennedy Dr / Hinesburg Rd intersection for the various scenarios examined. The shel�ume planned Kennedy Drive reconstruction will widen the roadway and increase the scuth Buriington capacity there, If for some reason this reconstruction did not take place, the additional "'ncamill delays introduced by the proj ect might be reason for concern. In the case of one Westfora direction (Hinesburg Rd northbound), the delays were projected to increase by 147 V6. istu:r seconds, or over 2 minutes of additional delay. However, the Kennedy Dr project is Mnao,k! moving forward and the assumption that this work will be cornpiete appears valid at tierr-:ant Agency of Transportacn this time. With the additional capacity available from the reconstruction, the delays generally increased by only 2-3 seconds for each direction with the O'Brien Farm Ex officio Members development impacts factored in. Chirtenden CDunty -rans;crt°tion One issue to double check is the projected queue lengths at the intersections and the Authont)� Bur ingwn length of any dedicated left and right turn lanes. If the line of vehicles at an nt°rnati'"`' a" intersection goes beyond the length of the turning lanes, then the delays for the turning Commisslon a "'a""'rg movements could be affected. The Signal 2000 software used in the level of service C�mm analysis does not take this into account when computing delays. The northbound Ra1! Industry us. 7epenmFnr , approach of Hinesburg Rd at the Kennedy Drive intersection is projected to back up 629 feet according to the queue model in the Signal 2000 software. This is still not close to the approximate 1200' foot distance to the Hayes Ave intersection; but could mean greater delays for turning vehicles on that approach. The location of the development within the traffic overlay district of the South Burlington zoning ordinance should be noted. It appears the projected PM Peale hour trip ends fall well below the limits established for the overlay district, but this issue Should be examined in more detail as the proposal moves forward. IM00Z 0i3J.'.1%31 TUE 13:31 F.'Ll 502 al )r.D73 CCIP0 IE003 CCi,PO O'Brien Farm PU!) Traffic impact Study Review 8/21 /2001 2of2 The traffic impact study concludes with three specific roadway capacity increases the development should provide to mitigate the traffic impacts: 1. Exclusive left turn lanes should be constructed on Hinesburg Rd at Hayes Avenue. 2. The Kennedy Dr access should be configured for right -turn only movements. 3. There should be a median. on Kennedy Dr at the access point to prevent unauthorized left - turn movements. The study does not make it clear how these measures would be implemented — would the developer take responsibility, or would the City be required to fund the design and construction of these projects? The traffic impact study does not discuss the potential of cut -through traffic using Hayes avenue to circumvent the Hinesburg Rd ! Kennedy Dr intersection. This would be very difficult to forecast, but the possibility of this occurring certainly exists. This issue could be addressed in part with traffic calming measures along Hayes avenue to discourage fast-moving vehicles in search of short-cuts. 'The study does not examine issues related to bicycle or pedestrian travel or public transportation, aside from stating there will be a path parallel to Hayes rive through the development. While these issues are often not included in traffic impact studies, the CCMPO does encourage new developments to provide the means to access a variety of modes of transportation. CCTA provides service along Hinesburg Rd and Kennedy Dr and the development could provide facilities for residents to access the public transportation system, such as sidewalks out of the development to Kennedy Dr and Hinesburg Rd and additional shelters for riders at these locations. Other Bicycle, pedestrian, or public transportation concerns could be addressed as the development plan moves forward. In summary, the O'Brien Farm Development ger crates a relatively small impact on the regional transportation system. However, the additional traffic generated does add to the incremental impacts of all the ongoing developments in the area. When taken together these developments can cause increased traffic congestion when development impacts are not mitigated with access to alternative modes of travel or more substantial increases in roadway capacity. The traffic i;npact fee ordinance enacted by South Burlington addresses this issue, out the impact fee may not anticipate all of the future needs oftee transportation system in South Burlington. For this reason, it is important to continuously refine the vision for future transportation opportunities in the City of South Burlington. su a P%2.I7 TpjAG{-- •�••�•• m.mma..Rn�eaa.ae..na m�mn.n ai,e �a�noot I O'Brien Farm I r.o. m. ztea wt m+.a•are� .wm�om. .rem,om nswt eoz ese ews .ro.�...w=r.� tir.r-o- sown awbgmn, v«mom os.o3 �, Secrion B-B u xta„w•��'�~ rbww wwm.cM.a°m.r.r �;� �.°j-O'Brien Farm f----per swm evapan, v.morc n5em °m mli.utrt .4wpen roi 61°t em a°!L6 .► .mrt� � ur.r-tr � S-d—A-A j 8 t Z—,, t4l oR iw�..txthN P ��� t,L7 rcIT& tiaa pie Eat UCGC.'rPrT�otit� m as nBro. «,In bMP:Nlo�.pYmNmcbb M8 p-0 Box iil9 O'Briea Po. Farm ' °l O Bouts Bu n, Vamont 05.0:f 9M mlpe.pat•Oumphin wam�dY 95W1 Bpi �Y 15% w+•.1.•hm• 1T•1'-P SC tion C-C Nl.� i7 RX t'�'�I � 4; R%* > t 13d; / 1, t AA -T -0 oan.. aoew.. p.nw �� rw„o...++aa..oa.�m.+•r re "�^^^+ O'Brien Farm "G v.o. e.. z+a em aaq.e.w .e�momn •+m.n m.o+ eat ue ae� ea:e....we..an +••>p CJ Wellaley Grove Grading Ran R E A L E STATE D E V E L 0 P M E N T A D NLJ A NAG CM ENT FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET TO: ` DiN rf�n FAX -.33v FROM' Zl 1 car✓ -------- DATE: NTTMSER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED' (Including Cover Sheet) -7 COMMENTS: 1ti -FHB 4� le_ "'A � v—'V o f'( ('e. . NOTE:This transmission contains privileged and conEdential information intended only for the addressee named above, Any use, dissemination or distribution by any person or entity other than the addresses is strictly prohibited If you have received this transmission in error, please notify my office immediately by telephone and return the original transmission to me at the above address. 1855 Williston Road - P.O Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 • (802) 658-5000 • fax 658-5002 e-m4il 0Srien8r0$@aoLcorr. Mx, Ray Belair City of South Burlingtm Office of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlingtfxt, V^C 05403 Carol BBxnard 630 Hinesburg Rd, 420 South Burlington, vT o54o3 2 August 2001 i am writing to you as President of the hoard of directors of Wellesley Grove CQndommimun Association and as chair of that association's ad hcrc committee on the O'Brien dtvelo mutt. This committee has retainod consWtants in three areas of great concerto to us: storm .eater runoff wetland preservation, and traffic. 1 am enclosing; the consultant reports on storm, water and wethutds. The traffic report will be sent to you as soon as otw consultant, Michael Oum, has had a chance to review the traffic study that has yet to be submitted by Mr. O'Wett In addition to these two consultant reports I am enclosing our comments and suggc stiw.s on the points to be considered at the next Development Review Board meeting about the O'Brien dMtelopment. I underslnnd that this meeting is scheduled fnr August 21 We have inet with Mr, O Brien several times and are r�tiy considering a pa vgwsal that might mediate wme of our differences. in the mean tijaie.. please considrr -a61 4,f (w concems with this development. SitZ�rely, Carol Barnard iE'residettt, Wellesley Grove C mdomutium Associatiun End : Wetlands rcpcn Stmmwatear RlinntFAnalysis Cc-. Jim Condos juli AC6 Hoovel John Dinklge Wellesley Grove Condominium AS50ci&tiOu COMWnts on O'Brien Farm Stitidiviston In light of all the, evidence contained in the attached report and excerpted below, and in absence of anad traffic data (not yet submitted), we request the following changes as a winitnum- • that the northommost three buildings be removed (the building d0se-k to the wetlands and the tivo buildings closest to unit I Of Wellesley Grove —see attachedl • that traffic pattem, & on Kawedy Drive be reconsidered BEFURE the egress to Kennedy Drive is approved, • that the buffer be increased to 1001 to protect eavironartentally sensitive arras and preserve the wetlands and Old growth trees as recommended by ow wetlands consultfixiil, and • that recommendatiLin,; fi�ojn our storm water consultant be imPletnented as part of the development design. RATIONALE AND OVERVIEW* The O'Brien Brothers and Wot Properties began, the pemking process for Wellesley Grove in the early MON. no Prclec was them sold to a developer who filed an amendment to theac- permits in 1985, Mr, 0,13ritn is proposing a similar process for his new development. Therefme, a study Of Wellesley Grove after 15 years of existence may provide some insight into what may occur with the Old Farm Road development. Well%IeY GrONT was originally proposed to coatain 7 buildings, i a total of 28 units. e devel ment rcvicw process resulted in a vniiller design of only 6 buildinp ar with Ota un ts The op . A 24 urats. The original design, although it may have nett density requirements, was on property that could reasonably contain fewer buildin_gs and roads than Originally proposed. The re-sults. Of (Aff work and Our consultants' work have demonqmted that this new O'Brien design is also too dense for the property an which it will be built. The proposed design serves as an example of the developer's inclination to design the "10 equivalent of pounds of sausage into a 5 pound casing!" At the tune Of the Wellesley Grove constructi4`n, regul2tium to Prcrie-ct the wetlands wid conservation and open space district, as wel, as the small steam on the property, were not its stringent- only a few feet separate buildings fi-oril these envimirtmenWI-v 5 a e our sensitive areas These unit owners are not abic to use Javm areas adjacymt to their dtcics because of the sloping nature of the land and the danM of erosion_ We are asking the DR13 to protect these areas from the additional impact of this enormous new undertakffig, through increased setback fron, the wetlands and reduction in Lhe number of allowed buildings, There is 9L large beam between our buildings and Hinesburg Road. The slope of this berm presents major maintenance problems. The developer of Old Farm Road Proposes the addition of 6' to S' of 611 t al1r,w for wa&Out Wsemmts, creating an approximate I in slope 5 On the property o The soils on this propertyarc to prone erosion whfn subject to increased velocities and volumes from runoff such as May result from roofed areas and paved areas, Maintenance of these slopes vvill be difficult- resulthig 4' an inability to conMil) the runoff' from nearky rcro&ant! Patios. DENSITY The aflurwed density on this property is bawe�m 113 and 90 units, The developer has requested 101 units, it is our uridmtanding that this range of allowable density has been established to accLAmt for property where the gross acreage, allows Ul build -out but tFa cOnfig'1170tim Of the land does not We Arm8lY suggest that the lower density rcqixirement Should be placed on this development 711we are several reasons for our suggestion: impact on fragile wetlands that drain two Potash Brook (on the federal 'impaired" watur-way list); tile need for setback and height variances "sandwich" 'i to be able to all the proposed buildkags onto the property; d See our noteti below an each Of these �Ubjft impact eta "Mc an schools_ As- (1140te that the "sarldwiL+- via term has been used by the developer to describe the wetland area park to be deeded to the city,) �CCE SSICM(-'UA'f ION The applicant has roquosted a variance fiyr the required private circulation road wid:h to 22' rather than 24% This impacts Mow removal and roadside It is indication parking. another that the developer is attempting to place more haildings and roads in the deyelopmant than the land configurabon will mellow, PARK AREA The total area of the park areti that will be deeded to the City it 3.4 acres. The public use, will be walking, sitting, biking and Contemplating whatever rL&tuTe is [Off in the area_ Our Concern is that casiw or-ucss to this f�agilc wetiand environment will eRcourage abuse of ffie buffer and encroachment into the wedands, This infringement into Old Farm Road Mn-elopment 08/0&01 Page 1 the wedand area wilt adversel,, aifrct the native anirnai and plant PGpulatiatt that will have aalrcady bees, disturbed by neurby construction - developer has de'4'�ribcd otie of the proposed Wetland park areas as being "sandwiched between Gatldwicile 'Tv'clleyl=y Grave and the I'c.wtihol.ase unit we are requesting." �hE operative word here is "sandwii;lied" SCHOOL, IAVACT The report from the Skim BwHngton Scb eci District business manager says studertts + stirnate d from this phrase of the dcvelupment that school clan handle the S brit makes special note that the school district is concerned "with the cumulati ye impact of prig and co ntlziu* development". The repro a1sr states that: "flair project, coupled with previous projects frch last talc and curren4 reyueast; tray cause the district to accelerate the year where tho m&ximurzi capacity is rut;lzed," It also states that "Construction aid fdr schools arc now placed on a priority listing that would appear to make it di-fficult tier So. Burlington to gain aid in a timely fitshion to meet im needs if development wnuld continue at the accelerated ace n1'the pending capacity p pest two years" (see attached). I.l'MITCES — S-rlr)RMWA'TEIt It[iNOPF t7ur eatnsttitant has suggested that the developer should continue site work fm western edge al ditch alot,g Knesbaerg to the norm. g Hinesburg to include the adjac4mt lot with the house, the culvert under Vr/ellesley Grove driveway, and t?ossibly to Our consultant has suggested ftt the developer should construct a small berm between two properties to contain storm water runoffaleng the shared property line. WT,"I'1.ANDS, CONSER VATIoNjOpEN SPACE bI$TR]CT Buildings and patios are designed to be built directly at the so, wetland bufFe r. We question the developeK's swale� to control iIIi�et on the buffer during consuixtion, Iircmxvc tied and shavbs and protect existing drainage swales_ Snow banks alextg public road, private roads and parking areas will melt into the wetlands. catryir�g witl, it Oil, gas, salt dirt and other r;tartain�tats. Steam watt treatment proposed by the developer should decreosre runoff to wetlands by newly one hclf. Tliis guano, help but advesrsely ieflP'ect the wetland environment. 6rir ccxost ltant has requested that the US Army- Corps of lb'ngrineera survey the wetland desigtttatin�, She believes that there is one area irY which tee wetland extends furtlie r than indicated on the maps. COVERAGE, SETAACIC5 The developer has requested many variants for height arid setback distai)ces. We believe that ne is hying to Place larger houses and mcTe rounds An this property than it can handle. TRAFFIC, How does the cantpledon of this phase l of the larger development ctarelate with the cpmpleti()n of the widening of Kennedy Drive? What sort of traffic c$Inaing; Mature+ will be built into the roadwzty dczign? Can truck traffic be htuned? It is very difficult to understand that on one hwnd we larnerit the fad that we are overwhelmed by heavy South } 1 Yet oa the citlicc hand keep approving dc-6 lopro.Grit that can do nothing but contribute to this heavy h8fiic. u� ties the heaviest traffic in tYi, state, with. same intersections approaching 40,000 vehicles per day. is it Possible that some deve ivpers' traffic experts have `missed the mark"? Is the DRB perivitttrig too much growth too quickly and consequently overwhelming ow iufra9tni0ure? Should we not wdden roads. boil . id d elks Maeatfon Paths and then determine how much mtxe development should dx allowedT We leave ceceivead co"fli(-It ig information altoit the existing trees and shrubs on the shared . ru line lx �ind the proposed tawnhotases acid our Wilding 1. We have been told alknuitely that the veget tionew ll N; removed beyond the .30, buffer line, all vegetation. will remairt, rsr some vegetation will remain, Which is cvrrirtT The: developer 'units to decrmse the diame;tas of roadway trees �d dacrease spacing, between them_ later expericzhce is that for 10 years it looks ftrio, er Nne're are cxastl d �/ f y t �n; �� Y Problem associated with managing overcrowded trees. +bt- Old Fprm Load Develapnimt 08!06/01 Page 2 PARKING Storm grater runoff from rails wkll be diverted towards the roadway drains a d into storm watex retention Ponds. 140°avver, srrOw bw*s along the roadways and parking areas will melt directly into the wetland area_ carrying with it Saft, oil, gas, dirt that was plowed up with the snow_ HEIGHT VARIANCE Does the applicant need height variance for the townhouses? We Understand that he must nxeasure #morn dse pre-develoPment ground level. Three-story buildings are clefirritely not .in keeping, with the neighborho(W, especially these buildings Wilk" abutting Other crmdolniAiuml associatiml land. Three-story buildings will adver.3ely affect the essential character of. the neighborhood. The developer will be unable to scTeeu emotively the line of sight horn the main living areas in new t0wr 1tourses directly into bedroom area of a casting townhouses. Further, on -street parking at the proposed level of 6' to g' higher dean Present ground level (i.e., * the height of the frcint rtonr, one flight up from thr, watk-,wj. basemOnt) wrllt shine car light night into thee 11 doer living and 2�ai'd flow bedroom areas cif the adjacent we'lesley �id'OiY. lalalts in building l - ����� V ro We thank you For yo attention these im`portarlt p t8sraesy�. . Old Farm Roan! Develorment O8106/01 Page 3 Act 250 School Impact Questionnaire for Res1do >!tisl Projects Applicant to Complete. Applicant rams: Municipality: Number of Lots or Units: 1-Hays ,�ve•Min�s�,�rr�L ,^,:;��Y - - Estimated Number Of sttit tints: 5e m�1 tyrpil r u � x � b�sdraams�191 x_1313-14.71 45 townhMAG x 3 bFrdrWrrd -- 135 x.2625 - 35.43 Totak 50.14 School Superintent±dent or Equivalent to complete: What schools under your supervision will provide educational services for famiiios who will live in this project? ElerrnerAriay School: C m Diddle School:—�-- High School: SBHS -- Do these schools have thy; capacity, to accept the additional students distribution) Yts or No listed shove? {assume equal grade Tf "no," what is the deficiency? While at the Present time the school district can Acaara=udate the additional students pmiected by this individual project, the coucem far the School District is with lase eunnoiative unpact of prior and Continuing development m our comity and die District's capacity to serve the stud.^rnta. This project, coupled with previous projects from last year and ctartca, ro requests, sy eauae tin district to rrrxehrn etc lift yrar w1W-. d2t mWdMutn capacity is reached, nmeasitaring construction of a ne-w facility. 7be passing ofAct 60 adds additional cewemta regarding, development a,nd developments irrtprat:t on the tax rate, Construction aid for schools are now placed an a priority listing that would appear to nuke it difffrcarht for So. Burlington to gain aid in a timoly fashion to meet i nMuding capacity needs if development would continuo at the accelerated pace of the past two years. Any construction costs that are not offset by revenues other than property tare would further penalize our Communities by increa igg our above block cost for stude is and tht carrespoodiag taxes that would'ac raised and sent to the sharing pool. What plant are In place to correct titre ptrWein? Impact foes will ,serve to recapture space and rcmvaw ti cl a into useable clasamoms. Distnct offices will reav'build space outsi k of school facilities. [fplxas erbt, haw could thifi trppllcant help addevt tk®ae platy beyeud adding new homes to the grand list? It is recumnwAded that South Butliagton cOutinue to bslance its growth bctw"n business and homing. Do you havf other comments? See above I Certify the above inforntation is true and accu a.tc to the best of my knowledge. himilYn Frederick Name__- Busmu Managa AMtaoat -- ---------- 2-22-0 1 DE Are you available, stiff 31drWient notice, to anssvvver questiotta related to the above statements at an Act 250 hc4rng? Yes or -� NO No Text AGENDA South Burlington Development Review Board City Hall Conference Room 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Meeting, A 7:30 P.M. Tuesday, August 21, 2001 1) Other Business 2) Report on recent site plan decisions issued by the Director of Planning and Zoning: A) Site plan application #SP-01-56 of the South Burlington School District to amend a previously approved site plan for two schools totaling 167,000 square feet. The amendment consists of. 1) adding eleven parking spaces, and 2) minor circulation alterations, 550 Dorset Street. Approved B) Site Plan application #SP-01-51 of the Humane Society of Chittenden County to amend a previously approved site plan for a 10,704 square foot building for kennel use. The amendment consists of. 1) reducing the size of the structure from 10,740 square feet to 10,240 square feet, 2) adding a cement walk, and 3) adding a gravel exercise area, 633 Queen City Park Road. Approved C) Site plan application #SP-01-48 of the City of Burlington to amend a previously approved site plan for an 110,565 square foot airport terminal. The amendment consists of: 1) adding a 347 square foot elevator tower to the terminal structure, 2) adding a 918.5 square foot covered walkway to the terminal structure, and 3) expanding the north end aircraft ramp, 1200 Airport Drive. Approved 3) Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application #SD-01-34 of Daniel & Leo O'Brien, DBA Forest Park Reality Corp. and The O'Brien Family Limited Partnership for a 101 unit planned residential development and a six (6) lot subdivision, Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive. 4) Sketch plan application #SD-01-44 of John Larkin for a planned residential development consisting of. 1) the transfer of density from 44.82 acres of adjoining land to a 59.95 acre parcel, and 2) subdividing a 59.95 acre parcel into 52 single family lots and 72 multi -family units in 25 buildings, 1539 & 1545 Hinesburg Road. 5) Public Hearing: Final plat application #SD-01-45 of Acadia Realty Trust to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 130,441 square foot shopping center. The amendment consists of. 1) razing a 114,771 square foot portion of the building, 2) constructing an 81,800 square I foot building, and 3) constructing a 3,000 square foot addition to the remaining portion of the building resulting in two (2) buildings with a total square footage of 100,470, 516 Shelburne Road. 6) Site plan application #SP-01-40 of the New England Federal Credit Union to: 1) construct an awning on the west facade, 2) eliminate one parking space, and 3) construct a second curb cut on Laurel Hill Drive, 1000 Shelburne Road. 7) Public Hearing: Application #CU-01-31 of South Burlington Realty Company seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, and Section 26.65, multiple structures and uses on lots, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to add standard restaurants, not including fast food and taverns, night clubs and private clubs, to the uses allowed at 2069 Williston Road. 8) Site plan application #SP-01-45 of South Burlington Realty Company to amend a previously approved site plan for a 19,378 mixed commercial building. The amendment consists of adding standard restaurants, not including fast food and taverns, night clubs and private clubs, to the uses allowed at 2069 Williston Road. 9) Sketch plan application #SD-01-43 of Carol J. Douglas to subdivide a .66 acre lot into two (2) lots: 1) lot one a .32 acre lot, and 2) lot two a .34 acre lot, 40 Birch Street. 10) Public Hearing: Application #CU-01-32 of Independent Wireless One Leased Realty Corporation seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to install three (3) 64"x 10.6"x 2.7" antennas on the existing WJOY tower, 70 Joy Drive. 11) Site plan application #SP-01-46 of Independent Wireless One Leased Realty Corporation to amend a site plan for a tower 300 feet in height. The amendment consists of installing three (3) 64"x 10.6"x 2.7" antennas on the existing WJOY tower, 70 Joy Drive. Respectfully submitted, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer lul3LVJ to] :7191,1100iI To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer Re: August 21, 2001 agenda items Date: August 17, 2001 3) DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & ZONING'S REPORT Enclosed are the Findings of Fact and Decision for the following site plan applications: A) Site plan application #SP-01-56 of the South Burlington School District to amend a previously approved site plan for two schools totaling 167,000 square feet. The amendment consists of. 1) adding eleven parking spaces, and 2) minor circulation alterations, 550 Dorset Street. Approved B) Site Plan application #SP-01-51 of the Humane Society of Chittenden County to amend a previously approved site plan for a 10,704 square foot building for kennel use. The amendment consists of. 1) reducing the size of the structure from 10,740 square feet to 10,240 square feet, 2) adding a cement walk, and 3) adding a gravel exercise area, 633 Queen City Park Road. Approved C) Site plan application #SP-01-48 of the City of Burlington to amend a previously approved site plan for an 110,565 square foot airport terminal. The amendment consists of: 1) adding a 347 square foot elevator tower to the terminal structure, 2) adding a 918.5 square foot covered walkway to the terminal structure, and 3) expanding the north end aircraft ramp, 1200 Airport Drive. Approved 4) DAN & LEO O'BRIEN — PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION — 101 UNIT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OLD FARM ROAD & KENNDY DRIVE This project was continued from the July 10, 2001 (memo enclosed) meeting as the application was incomplete. The applicant has submitted a traffic report since the July 10t' meeting (enclosed). The layout for the condominium portion of the project was revised and two (2) units were added. The projectconsists of a 103 unit planned residential development in 21 buildings and a six (6) lot subdivision, Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive. Density: The base maximum density for this development is 106 units (15.24 acres x 7 units/acre = 106.68). The normal maximum is 130 units (18.66 acres x 7 unite/acre). The applicant is proposing 103 units. Sewer: The sewer allocation requested will be provided at the meeting. It has been the Board's policy to approve sewer allocation for ten (10) years from the date of final plat approval. Any buildings for which a zoning permit has not been issued shall lose their allocation unless reapproved by the Board. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon for prior to permit issuance. Traffic: The traffic study submitted (copy enclosed) by the applicant has been forwarded to the Metropolitan Planning Organization for comment. Staff recommends that the applicant comply with the recommendations of the report : 1) construct left -turn lanes on Hinesburg Road at Hayes Avenue to serve the project, 2) the Kennedy Drive access be configured for right -turn movements only, and 3) a median be provided on Kennedy Drive to prevent unauthorized left -turn movements. Parking: Parking requirements for lot #1 are 106 spaces and 126 spaces are provided. Proposed Park: The Planning Commission conducted a site visit on the property and will prepare their recommendations for the final plat application. Other: The final plat submittal should indicate the E911 street addresses. 5) JOHN LARKIN — SKETCH PLAN —119 UNIT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, 1545 HINESBURG ROAD This project consists of a sketch plan application #SD-01-44 of John Larkin for a planned residential development consisting of. 1) the transfer of density from 44.82 acres of adjoining land to a 59.95 acre parcel, and 2) subdividing a 59.95 acre parcel into 52 single family lots and 72 multi -family units in 25 buildings, 1539 & 1545 Hinesburg Road. The Development Review Board last considered a sketch plan for this property at their February 20, 2001 meeting (minutes enclosed). This property lies within the SEQ District, the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Overlay Zone, and the Conservation and Open Space District. It is bounded on the north, west, and south by residences and on the east by Hinesburg Road and residences. Access: The applicant has revised his previous plans to utilize the r.o.w. over the McIlvane property to connect this development with Hinesburg Road. Access is proposed to be provided to phase one via a city street from Hinesburg Road, intersecting opposite Van Sicklen Road. Phase two of the development will connect the city street to Old Cross Road. Staff recommends that the access to Old Cross Road be given in dedication. The Official Map and the SEQ Map show a proposed city street which would be an extension of Old Cross Road. This proposed city street would cross through this property and intersect with Hinesburg Road opposite Van Sicklen Road. A link street would connect the Old Cross extension road to Butler Farms. The largest cluster of the multi -family buildings would have two (2) curb cuts on the Old Cross Road extension. The multi -family buildings #1, #2, and #3 are proposed to have six individual driveways onto Old Cross Road extension. Staff recommends the access for buildings # 1-#3 should be combined into one curb cut. A curb cut to three multi- 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO AUGUST 21, 2001 MEETING family buildings (U,V, and T) is proposed to be constructed at the time the Old Cross Road extension is complete. No single family lot would have access onto the Old Cross Road extension. A 30 foot r.o.w. is being reserved to provide access to an existing two (2) acre lot owned by Michael Marceau between lots #7 and #8. This access is noted on the plan. Lot size/Frontage: The preliminary plat application should include information on all lot sizes to ensure that all lots meet the minimum lot size and frontage requirements as well as any requested waivers. The preliminary plat submittal should include the approximate acreage of each proposed lot and a perimeter survey of the entire property. Densi : The applicant is proposing to transfer density from the 44.82 acres of adjoining land to a 54.95 acre parcel and five (5) acre parcel resulting in a total acreage density of 104.77 acres. This results in a maximum density of 125 units (104.77 x 1.2 = 125.724). A total of 124 units are proposed. The acreage of "development areas" as shown on the SEQ Zoning Map is unknown. The applicant should provide this information at preliminary plat in order to determine the maximum density allowable ( number of acres x 4units/acre = number of units). View Protection Zone: A major portion of this development lies within the Dorset Park View Protection Zone C. The preliminary plat submittal should include information on the maximum height of each of the lots and multi -family buildings. C.O. District/wetland buffer: A portion of this property lies within the C.O. District along drainage ways and around wetlands. This C.O. District/wetland buffer should be labeled. The lot lines for lots # 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, and 24 should be adjusted so no portion of the lots project into the C.O. District. Restricted Area: Residential development is proposed in a SEQ restricted area. The Board may approve this proposal if the criteria of Section 6.606 of the Zoning Regulations are met. The applicant should be prepared to address these criteria. Staff recommends that the open space lot boundary along lots #3 - #7 be moved westerly to meet the zoning boundary line between the development area and the residential area so these lots will comply with the Zoning Regulations. Proposed City Street: The preliminary plat application should address the City's standards for streets and which streets are to be made public. The applicant should also address Sections 401.10)(2) and 401.1(k)(2) of the Subdivision Regulations with regards to the proposed public streets. School Impact: The applicant should submit correspondence from the South Burlington School District at preliminary plat evaluating the potential impact this project will have on the school system. Street Lights: The applicant should provide street lights along all public streets. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO AUGUST 21, 2001 MEETING Utilities: The preliminary plat application should include sewer & water main details as well as details of all proposed storm water facilities and sediment control. Landscaping: The preliminary plat submittal should include a detailed landscape plan for the multi -family units and street trees along all the proposed city streets. Impact Fees: The applicant should be aware that all impact fees will be applicable to the proposed new residences. Traffic: The preliminary plat submittal should include a traffic impact study. Sewer: The preliminary plat submittal should include a sewer allocation request Coverage/setbacks: The preliminary plat submittal should include building and overall coverage information for the multi -family lot. Setback requirements are met. Dumpsters: The applicant should note the type of screening for the dumpsters on the preliminary plat plan. Any dumpsters proposed for the multi -family units should be shown. Recreation path: The Recreation Path Committee reviewed these plans and submitted comments (see enclosed). Staff recommends that the applicant be responsible for construction of the bike path. The applicant is no longer proposing to construct a city street to connect to Old Cross Road. Staff recommends that in place of constructing this street, that the applicant construct a recreation path to Old Cross Road. Wetlands: The preliminary plat application should include wetland boundaries delineated by a wetland expert. Other: The open space and multi -family lots should be numbered. The plan should make provisions for mailbox clusters. The applicant should also clarify what is proposed for the existing two (2) acre parcel. If it is to be developed, the development must take place in the developable area. The minimum size of the proposed multi -family units should be noted on the preliminary plat application. Staff requests typical elevations of the proposed multi -family units at preliminary plat. The preliminary plat application should include street numbers. The preliminary plat survey should be stamped by a licensed surveyor and note base flood elevations. Section 412 of the Subdivision Regulations should also be addressed concerning preservation of site amenities such as trees, drainage ways, historic sites, and other features. Section 417(g) of the Subdivision Regulations should also be addressed concerning potential views and wildlife habitat. A report should be submitted addressing the PUD criteria under Section 26.151 of the Zoning Regulations. The preliminary plat plan should show the entire 99.77 acres involved in this P.R.D. C! DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO AUGUST 21, 2001 MEETING 6) ACADIA REALTY TRUST — FINAL PLAT, 516 SHELBURNE ROAD This project consists of amending a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 130,441 square foot shopping center. The amendment consists of. 1) razing a 114,771 square foot portion of the building, 2) constructing an 83,328 square foot building, and 3) constructing a 3,000 square foot addition to the remaining portion of the building resulting in two (2) buildings with a total square footage of 98,970, 516 Shelburne Road. The Development Review Board reviewed the sketch plan for this property on July 24, 2001 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 516 Shelburne Road lies within the C 1 and C.O. Districts. It is bounded on the north by a retail building and restaurant, on the east by undeveloped land (currently proposed for development), on the south by the I-189 off -ramp, and on the west by Shelburne Road. Access/circulation: Access is provided by one (1) 40 foot curb cut on Shelburne Road and a shared r.o.w. (Farrell Street) which runs along the north side of the property. Three (3) curb cuts are proposed on Farrell Street (formerly O'Dell Parkway). The applicant will be required to upgrade Farrell Street from Shelburne Road to the northeast corner of the property to City standards (including street lights). The design details for the upgrading should be the same as was approved for the O-Dell Parkway P.U.D. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 23.3% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is being reduced from 92.8% to 86.5% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage along Shelburne Road is being reduced from 75% to 36% (maximum allowed is 30%). The front yard coverage along Farrell Street will increase from 67.5% to 75% (maximum allowed is 30%). The Board may modify the front yard coverage along Farrell Street under Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations. Setback requirements are not being met for the addition. It is proposed to be 15 feet from the Farrell Street r.o.w. Farrell Street is designated as a future street which has a 40 foot setback requirement. The Board previously modified this setback requirement to 15 feet in their February 2000 approval (minutes enclosed). The modification of the standards was based on the elevations of the proposed addition which were deemed to provide strong pedestrian and human scale connection to the public street as recommended by the Design Review Committee. The applicant submitted elevations of the proposed addition. Material changes have been made and a height waiver is no longer requested. The proposed materials will be a rusticated block on the bottom level and clapboards on the upper level of the north fagade. The diversification of materials will help to break up this northern wall in much the same manner that the faux windows previously approved were intended to. Staff has no problem substituting the proposed elevations for the approved elevations on this far,ade. Building Height: The proposed addition will not require a height waiver. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO AUGUST 21, 2001 MEETING Parking: A total of 495 spaces are required and 486 spaces are provided including 19 handicapped spaces. This represents a 9 space or 1.8% shortfall. Staff does not have a problem with granting a waver for this parking shortfall. A bike rack is being provided as required. LandscMin&. The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs is $77,500 which is being met. Proposed plantings include: Maple, Ash, Pear, Birch, Spruce, Pine, Burning Bush, Spirea, and Yew Traffic: The applicant submitted a traffic impact analysis with the preliminary plat application. This study concluded that the reduction in overall size of the shopping center will result in zero (0) additional P.M. peak vtes. Sewer: This property is connected to the City of Burlington sewer system. Li tin : Exterior lighting consists of the following: - 10 250 watt metal halide lamps mounted on 23 foot poles - 16 250 watt metal halide lamps mounted on 23 foot poles - 13 100 watt building mounted metal halide The Director of Planning and Zoning has reviewed these lights and found them to be acceptable with the pole mounted lights. The Director recommends that the pole mounted lights be reduced to 20 feet in height. All lights must be downcasting and shielded. Any changes to the lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. Dumpster: All dumpster/compactor storage areas are labeled and screened. Other: Sound barrier fences are proposed between the loading areas of the shopping center and the adjacent residential area. 71NEW ENGLAND FEDERAL CREDIT UNION— SITE PLAN APPLICATION. 1000 SHELBURNE ROAD Site plan application #SP-01-40 of the New England Federal Credit Union to: 1) construct an awning on the west facade, 2) eliminate one parking space, and 3) construct a second curb cut on Laurel Hill Drive, 1000 Shelburne Road. Access/Circulation: Access is currently provided via two (2) curb cuts on Laurel Hill Drive. The eastern most curb cut is 27 feet in width while the western most curb cut is 10 feet in width. Under Section 26.103 of the Zoning Regulations only one curb cut is allowed per lot. The ten (10) foot wide curb cut was never approved. Front yard coverage is already being exceeded along Laurel Hill Drive. If the second curb cut is to be retained, improvements need to be made so that the degree of non -conformity is not increased. If this can be done staff recommends that the western most curb cut be tapered down to 20 feet in width by restoring the green area to the western most lip of the curb cut. The western most curb cut should then be labeled ingress only and the eastern most (the 10 foot) curb cut be labeled for egress only and appropriate signage erected and arrows painted in the parking lot. C kl 1 ' C • '' „h U, M AUGUST 21, 2001 MEETING Coveraize/Setbacks: Building coverage will remain 17.49% (30% max). Total lot coverage will increase slightly to 61.91% (70% max). Front yard coverage on Shelburne Road will remain 26.7% (30% max). Front yard coverage on Laurel Hill Drive is proposed to be 54% (30% max). All setback requirements are not being met. The proposed canopy will met setback requirements. Parking: A total of 21 parking spaces are required and 35 are being provided including two (2) handicapped spaces as required. Other: The plans should be revised to note the location of the proposed canopy. The note on the plans "maximum allowable setback" should be changed to "minimum setback allowable". 8) & 9) SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY CO. — SITE PLAN & CONDITIONAL USE, 2069 WILLISTON ROAD This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for a 19,378 mixed commercial building. The amendment consists of adding standard restaurants, not including fast food and taverns, night clubs and private clubs, to the uses allowed at 2069 Williston Road. This property located at 2069 Williston Road lies within the IC District. It is bounded on the north by Williston Road, on the west by a mixed used commercial building and medical office, on the east by two (2) commercial buildings and on the south by undeveloped land. The applicant is requesting to add the following two (2) uses to the previously approved list of approved uses for the multi -tenant building. The proposed uses are: 1) standard restaurants, not including fast food, and 2) taverns, night clubs and private clubs. This request is being made with the provision that all the uses in the building would not require more than 81 parking spaces, would not generate more than 3500 gpd in sewer demand and would not generate more than 96.6 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The reason for this type of request is so that the applicant can have the flexibility of changing tenants whose uses fall within the approved sewer, traffic and parking limits without having to return to the Development Review Board each time. When a use is to be changed, the applicant would contact the Director of Planning & Zoning and he/she would review the existing and proposed uses to make certain that it does not exceed the upper limits approved by the Development Review Board. The permitted and conditional uses in the IC District approved and proposed are as follows: 7 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO AUGUST 21, 2001 MEETING Permitted Uses 15.101 General Office 15.102 Medical Office 15.112 Catering and food delivery use Conditional Uses 15.208 Indoor recreational facilities 15.210 Retail business (excluding shopping centers, supermarkets, department Stores and discount stores) 15.212 Standard restaurants, not including fast food 15.213 Bakery and delicatessen restaurants 15.214 Taverns, night clubs and private clubs 15.224 Personal service Access/circulation: Access is via a 30 foot wide shared curb cut with the property to the east. The legal agreement for this shared driveway has been in effect since 1982. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 22.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 66.9% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 26.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). The front yard coverage calculation takes into account the proposed widening of Williston Road. Setback requirements are met. Parking: A total of 81 parking spaces including four (4) handicapped spaces and a bike rack are being provided. No combination of uses would be allowed which exceeds this limit without approval from the Development Review Board. Landscaping: No additional landscaping required or recommended. Traffic: This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 5 which would allow this property to generate 96.6 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. No combination of uses would be allowed which exceeds this limit. Sewer: The property is approved for 3500 gpd of sewer allocation. Any increase in sewer allocation would have to be approved by the Board. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO AUGUST 21, 2001 MEETING 10) DOUGLAS — 2 LOT SUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLAN, 40 BIRCH STREET Sketch plan application #SD-01-43 of Carol J. Douglas to subdivide a .66 acre lot into two (2) lots: 1) lot one a .32 acre lot, and 2) lot two a .34 acre lot, 40 Birch Street. Access/Circulation: The applicant should revise the plans to note how access will be provide to lot #2. The requirements of Section 26.20 of the Zoning Regulations will need to be met. A 20 foot right-of-way will be required to serve lot#2. The r.o.w. should remain private and be privately maintained. Lot Size/Frontage: The minimum lot size requirements are being met for single-family dwelling units. Minimum frontage requirements are not being met because one lot has no frontage. Coverage/Setbacks: The applicant should illustrate the existing and proposed building footprints on the final plat application. Sewer: A sewer allocation request should be submitted at final plat. Landscaping_ The applicant should be aware that. two (2) street trees will be required for each new lot created. 11) & 12) INDEPENDENT WIRELESS ONE LEASED REALTY CORP. _- TOWER ALTERATIONS - SITE PLAN & CONDITIONAL USE, 70 JOY DRIVE This project consists of a site plan and a conditional use application to amend a site plan for a tower 368 feet in height. The amendment consists of installing three (3) 64"x 10.6"x 2.7" antennas on the existing WJOY tower at an elevation of 140 feet, 70 Joy Drive. This property is located within the Commercial Two and Conservation/Open Space Districts. It is bounded on the north by a right-of-way, on the west by Joy Drive and a commercial lot, on the east by vacant land, and on the south by Interstate 189. Site Plan Criteria: Coverage/Setbacks: No effect expected. Conditional Use Criteria: The proposed project complies with the stated purpose of the Commercial Two District to "encourage general commercial activity." The proposed use will not adversely affect: a) the capacity of existing or planned community facilities. No effect expected. b) the character of the area affected. No adverse effect is expected. 6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO AUGUST 21, 2001 MEETING c) traffic on roads or highways in the vicinity. The proposed use is not' expected to affect traffic. d) bylaws in effect. The proposal is in conformance with the zoning regulations. e) utilization of renewable energy resources. There is no utilization of renewable energy resources to be affected. f) general public health and welfare. No adverse effect expected. 10 South Burlingon Flanni ag & Zoning To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: Juli Beth Hoover, AICP Director of Planning & Zaning RE: Planning Commission Meeting on SEQ Roads Date: Friday, August 17, 2001 I would like to give you all a summary of this past Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting on SEQ roads, paths, and open space connections. The meeting was very well attended and very productive. We were all pleased that Mike Munson, Williston's town planner, attended and participated in the meeting. I would summarize the major "consensus items" as follows: 1. NO road convection of Van. SicIden Road to Old Cress Load at this time. The group's consensus was that while it is prudent for the City to reserve such rights - of -way as would be needed to connect Old Cross Road to Hinesburg Road through the Marceau Meadows subdivision, it was NOT desirable to connect these roads at this time. There is serious objection to creating such a direct connection across the SEQ, past plans and the official neap notwithstanding. There is more support for connecting the north -south roads with circuitous routes through neighborhoods, as discussed below. Incidentally Mike Munson said that Williston would "object less strenuously" to development near Van Sicklen road if this connection is not made. 2. Four-way intersection for Marceau Meadows Road at Van. Sicllclera mnesbnar�. It was the consensus of the group that for the Marceau Meadows project, creating a four-way (90 degree) intersection for the Marceau Meadows road with Van Siciden Road and Hinesburg Road is vastly preferable from a safety and traffic control standpoint. 3. Interconnect neighborhoods with nen.gbborhood-scaled roads. Where was strong consensus that it is appropriate to connect new and existing neighborhoods with what one might describe as "neighborhood scaled" roads. The feeling might be summed up as "Make it possible for traffic to get from Butler Farms to the Cider Mill, but don't make it probable that traffic will drive that way." One angle the DRB might consider is using the City's street standards to "right - scale" the roads in the subdivisions. The City's street standards provide for standard residential/commercial/industrial streets with curbing and 15 foot paved travel lanes. They also provide for "low density residential" streets with 12 foot paved travel lanes and no curbing. For connector locations where sewer lines do not need to be run, and the purpose is simply to provide local roadway AdFIVO 21 _­` - WIMMANIN connections, roads built to the low density residential standards might be an appropriate way to make connections without encouraging high -volume, high- speed through traffic. 4. 'Mork to create larger o2en s]Race blocks without a bisecR& road. There was less consensus on the best course of action for the proposed open space areas for the Marceau. Meadows and Chittenden proposals. There is a right of way that could be used to create a road between Dorset Street and Hinesburg Road through the Chittenden property. Some believe this would be beneficial as it would create a Dorset -Hinesburg connection without funneling traffic onto Van Sicklen Road. The downsides to this proposal are that the intersection with that right -of way and Van Sicklen is extremely poor for traffic safety, and that this road would bisect a large area of usable agricultural land. The Planning Commission's general feeling is that creating a large, contiguous block of conserved open space is preferable to having a connector road go through. There is more support for finding a way to connect the Chittenden project to the Marceau Meadows roadway network --or at least reserving the potential to do so in the future --rather than splitting the open space area. 5. Sup -port comvletion of Swift Street Extension as the Lnjaor east -west woad, with oflLy local connector roads south of it. There was substantial agreement among the Planning Commission and the group attending that the Swift Street Extension is far and away the most appropriate and effective cross-town connector that could be made. The feeling is that the City should focus on making roads "neighborhood -scaled" south of Swift Street, and keep the higher volume traffic to Swift Street and points north. This is very consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 6. Su-pport a new interstate interchapye at Hinesburg Road. The Commission and public both strongly favored creating a new "Exit 12.5" as a good way to relieve pressure on Van Sicklen and other SEQ roads. The current administration in Montpelier has put a hold on any new interstate interchanges with the stated intent of preventing sprawl. A counter -argument, which the Planning Commission and the public supported, is that improving interstate access would relieve pressure on Van Siciden Road that detracts from the open space character of the SEQ. It is clear that having an interchange would allow much easier use of the interstate to get to Williston, where currently Van Sicklen is the only alternative to the Dorset/Hinesburg to Kennedy to Exit 14 route. Both Williston and South Burlington support creation of this exit and are pressing Vtrans to begin scoping. ° 0 9 5 5 CIT1' ARBORIST'S COMMENTS to the DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD for 7/10/01 Meeting 1} O'Brien Farm I would prefer to see a species other than Littleleaf Linden lining the roads into the development. Both Littleleaf Linden and Green Ash are becoming overplanted in the City of South Burlington. I'd also strongly recommend a mix of 3 or 4 species. I'd recommend substituting Freeman Maple for the Red Maples along the street as they are more drought tolerant and possibly more salt tolerant. Soil testing should be performed to determine pH. This area of the city can have heavy soils, which may be slightly alkaline. Both Red and Freeman Maple require slightly acid soil to perform at their U:st. CITY ARBORIST'S COMMENTS to the DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD for 7/10/01 Meeting 1) O'Brien Farah (continued) ® I like the use of Birch in clumps. I also approve of the Serviceberry and Tree Lilacs, both of which are under-utilized. 2) Howard Johnson's Paper Birch is a poor choice for an island in the middle of a parking lot due to the birch's susceptibility to drought, leaf scorch and various insect problems. a I like the choice of Magnolia in sheltered areas. 40 Austrian Pine should provide a good screen for the site. 3) St. Amand Proverty ® By parking lot A, plans indicate 38TN on 7.5 ft. centers. I assume these are Arborvitae. Otherwise the plan looks OK. C:1Marie111ew Folde6DRB - Arb Comment for'7-10-01.doc, 5-30-01 id FIRE CHIEFS COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD For 7/10/01 Meeting 1. O'Brien Farm — The units should be sprin.klered. 2. Sketch flan 1825 Shelburne Road Acceptable 3. Sketch flan 1200 Dorset Street The applicant shall consult with the Fire Chief on the location of a hydrant. ER'S COI LL IETNTS TO T�� DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ®ARC For 7/ 10/01 Meeting O'Brien Farm — 1. Lzurnn -vTater detention basins shall be maintained by the horse owner, not the City. Land for them shall. be deeded to their. 2. The Hayes ,kve leg connecting to Kennedy Drive should have a different name. 3. Lame gees should not be planted on top of water and sewer .mains. 4. Bilze path bends should be carves not 90 degree bends. S. If units are to have basements, the drains serving them shall be shorn on the -Duns. 6. The traffic island at the Kennedy Drive intersection should be set back from the road edge about 2 feet. St. Am, and Property Shelburne Road — 1. Site plan prepared by L. Lewellyn-Howley dated 4/18/01 is acceptable. Paul Heald 6 Lot Subdivision Dorset Street — 1. ale-vv -road should include a concrete sidewalk 2. 'Water, drainage and sewer line should be shown. Mr. Ray Belair City of South Burlington Office of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Belair, Carol Barnard 630 Hinesburg Rd, #20 South Burlington, VT 05403 2 August 2001 I am writing to you as President of the board of directors of Wellesley Grove Condominium Association and as chair of that association's ad hoc committee on the O'Brien development. This committee has retained consultants in three areas of great concern to us: storm water runoff, wetland preservation, and traffic. I am enclosing the consultant reports on storm water and wetlands. The traffic report will be sent to you as soon as our consultant, Michael Oman, has had a chance to review the traffic study that has yet to be submitted by Mr. O'Brien. In addition to these two consultant reports I am enclosing our comments and suggestions on the points to be considered at the next Development Review Board meeting about the O'Brien development. I understand that this meeting is scheduled for August 21S` We have met with Mr. O'Brien several times and are currently considering a proposal that might mediate some of our differences. In the mean time, please consider all of our concerns with this development. Sincerely, 11 kla,A L�a-" Carol Barnard President, Wellesley Grove Condominium Association Enclosures: Wetlands report Stormwater Runoff Analysis Cc: Jim Condos Juli Beth Hoover John Dinklage Wellesley Grove Condominium Association Comments on O'Brien Farm Subdivision In light of all the evidence contained in the attached reports and excerpted below, and in absence of final traffic data (not yet submitted), we request the following changes as a minimum: • that the northernmost three buildings be removed (the building closest to the wetlands and the two buildings closest to unit 1 of Wellesley Grove --see attached), • that traffic patterns on Kennedy Drive be reconsidered BEFORE the egress to Kennedy Drive is approved, • that the buffer be increased to 100' to protect environmentally sensitive areas and preserve the wetlands and old growth trees as recommended by our wetlands consultant, and • that recommendations from our storm water consultant be implemented as part of the development design. RATIONALE AND OVERVIEW The O'Brien Brothers and Milot Properties began the permitting process for Wellesley Grove in the early 1980s. The project was then sold to a developer who filed an amendment to these permits in 1985. Mr. O'Brien is proposing a similar process for his new development. Therefore, a study of Wellesley Grove after 15 years of existence may provide some insight into what may occur with the Old Farm Road development. Wellesley Grove was originally proposed to contain 7 buildings, with a total of 28 units. The development review process resulted in a smaller design of only 6 buildings and 24 units. The original design, although it may have met density requirements, was on property that could reasonably contain fewer buildings and roads than originally proposed. The results of our work and our consultants' work have demonstrated that this new O'Brien design is also too dense for the property on which it will be built. The proposed design serves as an example of the developer's inclination to design the equivalent of"10 pounds of sausage into a 5 pound casing!" At the time of the Wellesley Grove construction, regulations to protect the wetlands and conservation and open space district, as well as the small stream on the property, were not as stringent. Only a few feet separate our buildings from these environmentally sensitive areas. These unit owners are not able to use lawn areas adjacent to their decks because of the sloping nature of the land and the danger of erosion. We are asking the DRB to protect these areas from the additional impact of this enormous new undertaking through increased setback from the wetlands and reduction in the number of allowed buildings. There is a large berm between our buildings and Hinesburg Road. The slope of this berm presents major maintenance problems. The developer of Old Farm Road proposes the addition of 6' to 8' of fill on the property to allow for walkout basements, creating an approximate 1 in 5 slope. The soils on this property are prone to erosion when subject to increased velocities and volumes from runoff such as may result from roofed areas and paved areas. Maintenance of these slopes will be difficult, resulting in an inability to contain the runoff from nearby roofs and patios. DENSITY The allowed density on this property is between 113 and 90 units. The developer has requested 101 units. It is our understanding that this range of allowable density has been established to account for property where the gross acreage allows full build -out but the configuration of the land does not. We strongly suggest that the lower density requirement should be placed on this development. There are several reasons for our suggestion: impact on fragile wetlands that drain into Potash Brook (on the federal `impaired" waterway list); the need for setback and height variances to be able to "sandwich" all the proposed buildings onto the property; impact on traffic and schools. See our notes below on each of these subjects. (Note that the term "sandwich" has been used by the developer to describe the wetland area park to be deeded to the city.) ACCESS/CIRCULATION The applicant has requested a variance for the required private circulation road width to 22' rather than 24'. This impacts snow removal and roadside parking. It is another indication that the developer is attempting to place more buildings and roads in the development than the land configuration will allow. PARK AREA The total area of the park area that will be deeded to the City is 3.4 acres. The public use will be walking, sitting, biking and contemplating whatever nature is left in the area. Our concern is that easier access to this fragile wetland environment will encourage abuse of the buffer and encroachment into the wetlands. This infringement into Old Farm Road Development 08/06/01 Page 1 the wetland area will adversely affect the native animal and plant population that will have already been disturbed by nearby construction. The developer has described one of the proposed wetland park areas as being "sandwiched between Georgetown, Wellesley Grove, and the Townhouse unit we are requesting." The operative word here is "sandwiched". SCHOOLIMPACT The report from the South Burlington School District business manager says that school can handle the 51 students estimated from this phase of the development but makes special note that the school district is concerned "with the cumulative impact of prior and continuing development". The report also states that: "this project, coupled with previous projects from last year and current requests may cause the district to accelerate the year where the maximum capacity is reached." It also states that "Construction aid for schools are now placed on a priority listing that would appear to make it difficult for So. Burlington to gain aid in a timely fashion to meet impending capacity needs if development would continue at the accelerated pace of the past two years" (see attached). UTILITIES — STORMWATER RUNOFF Our consultant has suggested that the developer should continue site work on western edge along Hinesburg to include the adjacent lot with the house, the culvert under Wellesley Grove driveway, and possibly the ditch along Hinesburg to the north. Our consultant has suggested that the developer should construct a small berm between two properties to contain storm water runoff along the shared property line. WETLANDS, CONSERVATION/OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Buildings and patios are designed to be built directly at the 50' wetland buffer. We question the developer's ability to control impact on the buffer during construction, preserve trees and shrubs and protect existing drainage swales. Snow banks along public road, private roads and parking areas will melt into the wetlands, carrying with it oil, gas, salt, dirt and other contaminants. Storm water treatment proposed by the developer should decrease runoff to wetlands by nearly one half. This cannot help but adversely affect the wetland environment. Our consultant has requested that the US Army Corps of Engineers survey the wetland designation. She believes that there is one area in which the wetland extends further than indicated on the maps. COVERAGE, SETBACKS The developer has requested many variants for height and setback distances. We believe that he is trying to place larger houses and more roads on this property than it can handle. TRAFFIC How does the completion of this phase 1 of the larger development correlate with the completion of the widening of Kennedy Drive? What sort of traffic calming features will be built into the roadway design? Can truck traffic be limited? It is very difficult to understand that on one hand we lament the fact that we are overwhelmed by heavy traffic, yet on the other hand keep approving development that can do nothing but contribute to this heavy traffic. South Burlington has the heaviest traffic in the state, with some intersections approaching 40,000 vehicles per day. Is it possible that some developers' traffic experts have `missed the mark"? Is the DRB permitting too much growth too quickly and consequently overwhelming our infrastructure? Should we not widen roads, build sidewalks and recreation paths and then determine how much more development should be allowed? LANDSCAPING We have received conflicting information about the existing trees and shrubs on the shared property line behind the proposed townhouses and our building 1. We have been told alternately that the vegetation will be removed beyond the 30' buffer line, all vegetation will remain, or some vegetation will remain. Which is correct? The developer wants to decrease the diameter of roadway trees and decrease spacing between them. Our experience is that for 10 years it looks fine, after that there are costly problems associated with managing overcrowded trees. Old Farm Road Development 08/06/01 Page 2 PARKING Storm water runoff from rain will be diverted towards the roadway drains and into storm water retention ponds. However, snow banks along the roadways and parking areas will melt directly into the wetland area, carrying with it salt, oil, gas, dirt that was plowed up with the snow. HEIGHT VARIANCE Does the applicant need height variance for the townhouses? We understand that he must measure from the pre -development ground level. Three-story buildings are definitely not in keeping with the neighborhood, especially those buildings abutting other condominium association land. Three-story buildings will adversely affect the essential character of the neighborhood. The developer will be unable to screen effectively the line of sight from the main living areas in new townhouses directly into bedroom area of existing townhouses. Further, on -street parking at the proposed level of 6' to 8' higher than present ground level (i.e., at the height of the front door, one flight up from the walk -out basement) will shine car lights right into the I' floor living and 2"d floor bedroom areas of the adjacent Wellesley Grove units in building 1. We thank you for your attention to these important issues. Old Farm Road Development 08/06/01 Page 3 _ _ Act 250 School Impact Questionnaire for Residential Projects Applicant to Complete: Applicant • :r-• • •- AqpncV Inc Municipality: South Burlington Number of Lots or Units: 101- Hayes Ave/Hinesburg/Kennedy Estimated Number of Students: 56 multi -family units x 2 bedrooms=112 x .1313=14.71 45 townhouse x 3 bedrooms= 135 x.2625 = 35.43 Total: 50.14 School Superintendent or Equivalent to Complete: What schools under your supervision will provide educational services for families who will live in this project? Elementary School: Chamberlin Middle School: FHTMS High School: SBHS Do these schools have the capacity to accept the additional students listed above? (assume equal grade distribution) Yes or No If "no," what is the deficiency? While at the present time the school district can accommodate the additional students projected by this individual project, the concern for the School District is with the cumulative impact of prior and continuing development in our community and the District's capacity to serve the students. This project, coupled with previous projects from last year and current requests, may cause the district to accelerate the year where the maximum capacity is reached, necessitating construction of a new facility. The passing of Act 60 adds additional concerns regarding development and developments impact on the tax rate. Construction aid for schools are now placed on a priority listing that would appear to make it difficult for So. Burlington to gain aid in a timely fashion to meet impending capacity needs if development would continue at the accelerated pace of the past two years. Any construction costs that are not offset by revenues other than property tax would further penalize our communities by increasing our above block cost for students and the corresponding taxes that would be raised and sent to the sharing pool. What plans are in place to correct the problem? Impact fees will serve to recapture space and renovate them into useable classrooms. District Offices will rentibuild space outside of school facilities. If plans exist, how could this applicant help achieve those plans beyond adding new homes to the grand list? It is recommended that South Burlington continue to balance its growth between business and housing. Do you have other comments? See above I certify the above information is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Marilvn Frederick Name Business Manager osrtion 2-22-01 ate Are you available, after sufficient notice, to answer questions related to the above statements at an Act 250 hearing? X Yes or No �•�•���` % � � it yp►�IliI1N1 11A/INQtl1111 -� , � � �� \ `;�� ` ii1 � ®®� Ion ,.. „j�••` ��' . ��:�� � IlUllliit�d�lulilillil �-�� �:'�♦,, �_ i DEVELOPMENT RE` MW BOARD MEMO JULY 10, 2001 MEE=4G Dum sters: Any dumpsters proposed should be shown on the plans. Currently no dumpsters are proposed. The applicant should note the type of screening for the dumpsters prior to final plat review. Parking: A total of 102 parking spaces are required for the development on lot one and 109 spaces are being provided. A total of 126 spaces are required for the development on lot two and 93 spaces are being provided. This is a 33 space or 26% shortfall. The applicant should be prepared to justify the shortfall. The plans should be revised to illustrate parking spaces within the proposed buildings. Bike racks should be provided throughout the development. Two handicapped spaces are provided for the units on lot two and five are required. The plans should be revised to provide three additional handicapped parking spaces. In addition, parking must be provided for recreational vehicles on both lots one and two. Recreation Path: The applicant is proposing a recreation path along the collector road connecting Kennedy Drive with Hinesburg Road. The Recreation Path Committee has reviewed the plans and submitted comments (see enclosed). Official 1yla . The Official Map shows a proposed City street connecting Old Farm Road and Hinesburg Road. This road is shown on sheet two of the plans. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed plans (see enclosed). Other: The minimum size of the proposed units should be noted on the plans as well as if a height waiver will be needed. Staff requests typical elevations of the proposed units at final plat. The applicant has not submitted a request for phasing of the development. The plans should be revised to show mailbox clusters if any are proposed. The homeowners' association documents should require that the garages can not be converted to living space. 5) HOMESTEAD DESIGN, E"4C. — FINAL PLAT APPLICATION — MINOR SITE 1V OMFICATIONS, PARK ROAD This project consists of amending a planned residential development consisting of 296 residential units and an 18 hole golf course, Dorset Street. The amendment consists of minor modifications to decks, grading, buildings, etc. for the then Eagles project, Park Road. The property is located within the Southeast Quadrant. It is bounded on the north by park land, and on the east and wet by open land, and on the south by residences. This application consists of minor site amendments (see enclosed letter). Entrance walks, stairs, patios and decks have slightly revised locations. The unit orientation of Building Five has been altered. Utilities and grading elevations have also been slightly revised. VA DEVELOPMENT RIEVIEW BOARD MEMO eN UL 3i 10, 2001 MEETING Coverage/Setbacks: The maximum coverages for the residential Seven District are 20% building coverage, 40% total coverage. Lot one has proposed building coverage of 16.3% and a total coverage of 31.9%. Lot two has a proposed building coverage of 17.2% and a total coverage of 39.1%. Lot -three will have a building coverage of0% and a total coverage of 3.4%. Lot four will have a building coverage of 0% and a total coverage of 0%. Total building coverage will be 12.3% and total overall coverage will be 35.1% for the planned residential development. All setback requirements are not being met. At sketch plan submittal, staff requested a list of setback waivers requested including the location and the amount of waiver requested. This has not been provided. The applicant must formally request setback waivers prior to final plat review. Unit 411 on Stonington Circle and 19, 79, & 30 Lancaster Lane do not meet the 30 foot front yard setback requirement. Traffic: At sketch plan submittal the applicant was made aware that a traffic impact study would be required with the preliminary plat application. The applicant has not submitted a traffic impact study. Staff recommends that the application be continued to allow the applicant time to comply with this requirement. Lighting: All lights must be downcasting and shielded. The applicant has proposed: - 19 M-250A2 pole mounted street lights mounted at a height of 24 feet to serve the proposed public street - 2 Wallighter 250 wall mounted lights - 39 70 watt metal halide pole mounted lights mounted at a height of 20 feet to serve the private streets - a sign light Cut sheets should be revised to clearly note wattage and type (ie. Sulfur, metal halide, etc.).. The proposed sign light should be screened in such a manner that it does not produce light spill into 'Hinesburg road or otherwise interfere with traffic. In addition, the applicant should consult with Careen 'Mountain Power to make sure that the proposed pole mounted lights within the public street right-of-way are acceptable. Landscaping: The plans should be revised to increase the size of the proposed street trees from 2" caliper to 2.5" caliper. The site planting should be separated from the street trees. The minimum landscaping requirements for Lot One and Lot Two, based on building costs, are being met. Sewer: The applicant has requested varying amounts of sewer allocation. Staff has requested that the applicant clarify the requested amount of gallons per day allocation. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. Impact Fees: The applicant should be aware that all impact fees will be applicable to the proposed new residences. 6 DEVELOPMEN7RIEVIEW BOARD TM ENIO DULY 10, 2001 MUTE% private street to be known as "Stonington Circle" has two (2) access points to the new City street. This private street will serve 45 units. The other private street to be known as "Lancaster Lane" has two (2) access points to the new City street. This private street will serve 56 units. Section 40 1. 1 (k)(b)(2) requires that these streets serve no more than 20 units. Section 401.1(k)(b)(3) of the Subdivision Regulations allows the Board to exceed the 20 units when it "determines such a road would improve traffic safety conditions and not adversely affect the public good and welfare of the community". Proposed Park: Because the City's Official Map shows "parks and open space" in a general way on the O'Brien property, the Planning Commission will need to review the site and make a more formal designation of appropriate park land on the property. The specific site will need to be designated through an Official Map amendment, which is proposed by the Planning Commission for final approval by City Council. No DRB action is needed at this time. A detailed memo on the issue from the director of Planning & Zoning is enclosed. School Impact: The applicant has submitted correspondence from the South Burlington School District evaluating the potential impact this project will have on the school system. Approximately 51 additional students are expected as a result of this project. The South Burlington Schools Business Manager has stated that the schools have capacity to accept the additional students expected. Street lights: The applicant should provide streetlights along all public streets. Utilities: The plans submitted include sewer & water main details as well as details of all proposed storm water facilities and sediment control. A stormwater runoff analysis was included in the preliminary plat application. The applicant in the enclosed letter has summarized the results and proposed mediation measures. The proposed stormwater controls have been revietived by the City Engineer (see enclosed mom®). The homeowners' association documents should note that the association is responsible for the maintenance of the stormwater retention ponds. Other: The final plat application should include a revised street name for Hayes Avenue as Hinesburg road bisects the other portion of Hayes Avenue. The preliminary plat should be revised to note base flood elevations. Enclosed is a letter from the applicant addressing Section 412 of the Subdivision Regulations concerning preservation of site amenities such as trees, drainage ways, historic sites, and other features as well as Section 417(g) of the Subdivision Regulations concerning potential views and wildlife habitat. A report is enclosed addressing the PUD criteria under Section 26.151 of the Zoning Regulations. Conservation/Open Space District: The plans illustrate the Conservation & Open Space District and the wetland buffers. No encroachment is proposed. DEVILOPMEIN7 RIEVHW BOARD TMEM0 JULY 10, 2001 MEETING 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 4. T'sne applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the new store. 5. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Design Review Committee. 4) DAN & EEO O BRUN — ?RELEVHNARY PLAT APPLICATION — 101 IUNTY MANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ULD FARM ROAD & KENNDY DRIVE This project consists of a preliminary plat application for a 101 unit planned residential development and a six (6) lot subdivision, Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive. The sketch plan for this project was considered at the November 21, 2000 Development Review Board meeting (minutes enclosed). A traffic study was requested at sketch plan and not provided with the preliminary plat application. The applicant is aware of this requirement. Staff recommends that the application be continued in order to provide the applicant time to comply with this requirement. This property is located between Old Farm Road, Kennedy Drive, and Hinesburg Road within the Residential Seven and Residential One Districts. It is bounded on the east by Old Farm Road, on the north by Kennedy Drive, on the Nest by residences, and on the south by Hinesburg Road and residences. Lot size/Frontage: The proposed lots meet frontage requirements as well as minimum lot size. Densi : The normal maximum density for lots one through four combined is 113 units, and 101 units are being proposed. The applicant has proposed utilizing the density for lots three and four and tu_ming these lots over to the City for park use. Information to determine the base maximum density has not been provided. This information should be provided before final plat review. Access/Circulation: The applicant is proposing a City street (60 ft. r.o.w. and 30 ft. pavement) to traverse the development from Hinesburg Road to Kennedy Drive. Also proposed are private streets (24 ft. of pavement) to serve the multi -family dwellings. The 11 0 m�e 1 N PARCEL 2RE � •AIHO BRIE PARCEL 1` J \ tea- ow - �- o T. J. Boyle and Associates Georgetown \ , /• / "ram =''�� � \ 00 Wellsley Grove ------------- - , - _ i:1 ,' - mPa , iUa 3 �I 6. 44 43. ---------------- osaena rafter yylm, meaa®rc.,cMmaa cweene m�,eua: Mee o�-,o-o, O'Brien Ferro n P o.emxtao aot cada.w», evtrreme .• aasaot m�rae Cmnpoeiw PI.. G awxnaana� mo venom asaa3 _ 5,t �� i✓r� - - -.ems a; ��; r � - �ww> .-2:`�-°���2d_ e� w« � �� � � w % 3 : a. � E�f� \� � k � :� « a � �� . � ©7 , » . . .� . . 9 <®,° innionamimummi , R wall, Ir .......................... . . . . . ........... I. O'Brien leam 054M . V.0 I .:�9- r r 6'«M8^VO--5S ODA& #aysd 5-Codw I i I 1. J. Boyle and Associates CIS— —I'.— o,c� M.e a',", O'Brim F.= r.o. a x+a 8 swn n.v«mme awm w�meo. n..i.ymoe„+.mv�mm em ae� �s .o.r.� �+�r.i-v Seerian A -A N%-/ 01-V LSTU imgfl IM www.2n..a..osmme�M.e La�.mm O'Brien Farm ' Section B-B 9 n oF4- -- �.►� f�Rcp�rr uw�. c<c. .,c wa.ow.mn.a.. p.mmymarm O'Brien Farm 'PO. Bez 3161 M.A 0�-1Do1 10 Be.N 8vlr�pbn,y.moM o3101 >ot mbp. WM •dzFpbn . . fGOI !Of .2 w'Ad im w..ow.m+ 1rD' • 1'-P Section C-C Od ."A i v VIP, -da. I as -0 4 O O O � O 1� O� n tN \ ! 14ew LOT 3 y, � i NEW LO REMAINING '.� � PARCEL 2 R OMAI IN 6 PARCEL 1 olA o Oenm emmersnpamM. we.a,w,anera. ybx,ap w.rma. xee p�.�Dpi O'Brien Faz 1 P O. em�llpn 5(ry cMM,rM evMbn rx . p6npf Rl 6pBffi np..wr:lxbs MItoKM BLLb&VItiDm HN n + Swbeul mn,Vxnm1 05403 - — - - - - - - - - Georgetown Wellsley Grove M``I � \I` - AIL►_ �;�• � 1'� `` Inns, Rolm ==MIN vk#1 T J B, MM mw- 43. ■ FAMM all INS A2 fS k': NIM �� � � �� ~ � �' �' �� � �: ,� •o ��� Y °j`L7 r�-_ {%may � �. ��::,- �,: �� ,: r „ . dwi 1 p6 tT+t GRp.t� t1.�G. / LI OA4T -&F Gl-p�fYZtNG� . oen..e..n.r.ro.r�yxK. - T ie_o_em 7ru emus em .s.....�rt� r.o Wdidq O�a+OndtrK Plraa V IM r Lg VAMMUM T. J. v unen Parm RO, Sm 21M —ow m 4% S..tim A -A 0 an.. e — Aa.rV'ksnen ram P,O. W, 21" Secdm B-B 9 1 1 fmcp�s�'� r _ C'I �it3t7r�G pie O'&I &oM.nro.n%Mc ' O,Hn1 Lv $on C 0Ia�2D1 I I� .. �� ..,�..,,. �. oa . �...4.....d.m , U=d wuH.O wor�o aw aw.m>,w.w•w.sw..00a.n KK..9'O"d �I Aw.Dy u.,poq uyg0 S�rrrai7�t�,rd, a m" .off ,Q � A .• �•b, v HlQd c1H +� IdO Cam' -t - f 1 LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive • Engineers Essex Junction, VT 05452 • Planners • Surveyors • Landscape Architecture • Wetland & Soil Scientists TRANSMITTAL Tel. (802)878-4450 Fax (802)878-3135 mail@ldceine.co`n ❑ Fax ❑ Mail Hand Carried ❑ Pick-up ❑ Courier Service TO: 1�\y %CU--a) FROM: Ro6cp-, D C K) N'-) 0 -J ADDRESS: CITY yr SOui)a :BLAkLINGivN DATE: �_ / _ O PROJECT/RE: &1Z1Cry v,MC �%1P, rn FAX #: # PAGES: PROJECT #: U _ U Li COPIES DATE SHEET DESCRIPTION Prints 17 og,D r - IRA Mr- � M Pfk ivlal's S Shop Drawings Plans Copy of Letters Change Order Specifications Disk Comments: °® cffl �AV y` For review For your use For comment As requested F.Y.I. For execution /1 Signature: COPY TO: c01ny ❑ Front Office Copy ❑ Project File Copy revised 6-27-01 Z:\W PDATA\R0GER\TRANSMIT.wpd INDEX Sheet I Preliminary Plat Sheet 2 Overall Plan Sheet 3 Utility Plan - Stonington Circle Sheet 4A Landscaping Plan - Stonington Circle Sheet 4 Grading & Erosion Control Plan - Stonington Circle Sheet 5 Utility Plan - Lancaster Lane Sheet 6 Grading & Erosion Control Plan - Lancaster Lane Sheet 7 Road & Utility Profile Sheet B Road & Utility Profile Sheet 9 Road & Utility Profile Sheet 10 Road & Utility Profile Sheet 11 Road Details Sheet 12 Details Sheet LI Sheet 13 Sewer / Water Details Sheet L2 Sheet 14 Details Sheet L3 Sheet 15 Details Landscape & Lighting Plan Landscape & Lighting Plan Landscape Details BAR SCALE r = Soo• O'BRIEN HOME FARM OLD FARM ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT a XIIBBS & L4,IVSM6C Consulting Engineers, lnc. 164 amain Street, Colchester, Pernzont 05446 Mlrl PJmn#)g and Za9bg InfultmatAw 1855 IWIbt- Rood WAT P.O. 8- 2184 AIRrvt Agency, Ina Wellesley Grov# C60d�QMA7;UM 55k 5�7 SUM79ton. VWMmt 054aY v.A'.. Pogo ill Zomft DIsNot 198 A&y 16, 1963 V111- 214 Pogo b4 R*vk�,lltlhl 7 ZonAV N-b- 8, 19M Georgetown Homeowners 7aw ROn,*1 1.260-00200 Assoclatlan S40tv'16 -r Tow Pone 12970�-00255 mon, d 7F Z -M AMP= .4lotal Area69.1 14 � -\- C� OL (I)t - - - - ' WMC(h7g brook -.4 615' to '28�W 1407�� �;;� O-A Partnershp IP24 M we South 8&MfdA7gt0-n r- M. b-ft of MsAVV 14). Proposed Lot J Town Par* Morita IV ArArea0.36. 10'.A* to I- ffil b-M of bS. L Proposed Lot I INV79W�551 107.52 a Area 8 4 acres 1�4 k W MAAI&2 FrOpased Lot 2 Location Mao - Area acres Wm*1dg* Homeowners Assocl7 W- 175 RV. 428 \ Legend F.6-.y 2, 101 Ma &..M of M.Exhothg power pole of A605142:581E _i12 Surroy C.,,of pcht -" �. 24.BD'I I N12 --Proposed Lot 34 726 come,: Mnomwltatfon to' k. ol/fy Town Pork N0to be Set at omwe 0*01A6. t to ♦ - A ~eoP~ �AW • koplea A, -�1877 Property Ih7.23 ODY*n FOrnly Partener3lbo E.OtIng wood Volume 420 Page J45 December JI, 1997 255 Acres 9-f- L2`o',WM, -o '29- = f� tvl, b-.,* of Moo References \y �„ of So.M &Mh'gt- For"t Par* R#'W'v corA Frederick d & Volume 142 Page 4.97 Mary Maher August 24, 1978 W-,y lam ✓alum® 9' Pow M9 R&"0hA?g Lands 4.15 Acres2 '4W Ag-t 26, 1969 0*AW Fam#y United Partna-ShO Area = 159 acres Ramahkg Lands o--1F21 e. cmiio Forest Par* Redly Corp S08v4'lj'F Arva 54.5 affw Bayberry Loner F Bcwws -0413 M.AprASr NO - -5' 139,0W712 -W --- ` \ �°' \ 54,04 P107 J61.91, , a & I " DonnA \ salddro -50,5;4 �W i RandW V.4- J56 D-b- 21, L & #---- -�- ------ Dead References ALBeverly - Volume "N on Hopwood 1Gmnt- aan too tFdow Date \, Pogo =-W W- 175 1D.&IJ OgnWn Leo 0-. to OYnW� A-0LWW P-f-bo Ow.-Mor JI, 1997 564 ;_-/42M & Alone I I , t 1995 Ad2 1911 fthet. r - - - - 03*8-lb- to -t Ar* Redly l421497 Aug.,( 24 1170 `%- 180 Page 46J - Martha Rrie-.- M 02?dn firlb- IJ91145 M-0- 221977 bv RrAy2'5.00RYAVNWlRob-t A R�- to 07'- Broths- I-VII17 N.-b-22, 19175r0August 6 &NI. ofL- 0A,/- to Leo d 09-/-. J. and D-AW a OR/ 46145 October 14 19M Robert P Rwn Yb/-o 199 P.W 2Y Keg .ps & RoodsaY2 At ftrombr I-K 1983 -- - - - - - - * V./-. I Pow I AS06954J" 812&-P22 0-923 ----- - Road57Z8--- 4LWr4rM Rood 51.91 L-------------- ---------- -1RY� L - Kennough slars7, -- R aRI 8fH W 271.50 Roy Dome J. & Sandra Old 7OF44'40"W v. 0 vr1w Donlal & Leo Jr. Dowlel J & Leo d•k. OVr1w 0 ZW*" Boundary Notes 01 50, loo, -W, ix,' I Mo=b- of ffl- An* mal Mv vW0- /oo~ me 4 Anr b-Wy dWmnhxW� bated or d-ft 6. A. 'XIwlt of 0, fff of R--/- or offior A,9..t 14, 2001 Lot, I -d 0 M. 9a" - -W~ we 'ay"W to prok* '0ww h, by Mokh ffl/. or ,1gOts -*A. W.4 Arffi-lk -Y' be. Mn M-~ Doe. �W-d D-rotk, 10�-*�d Date 0 �U& tow`M7 most h&mVW of M,* w1ghol hunt of the C-Yed to Q`n#y Lkvmd .h- Al- To Met .1-4 0,- Al&. of -Y b. Bor Scale• 1.2 PW* Rarity Cporolkn o, M& � =ond Surwyed .& * h--y Wil, -Whg Ph -WA� W,4011 , 029�y. W-' F~ P.* Rlokv 0.�ebb. 'fill, I - ft& pot of -Y. PrellmIncry Plct -#kt. hot- pbj.Lw -d -*t- Md.- ;Vl=l- ==v -W.It* d,** :�%r db-ft *�add " �tvd F= to M. ova mW AVWI(y of We survey Is based all phwkol ooWm" Drawn FMP to Ni wn -y Iwo, W - -Rkt. 61- ol-ok - do-ft WM- th- Weds - d-1. on 7. IN, plot a -y i, lbr 6* -V use of VVM. F-Wy UnAlod found h7 the Ae/d and written *Ndwc* = �W matterM 0matterOf Of 14W MM07 aurae* W Pwtw.aw Face P&* Rw(y cwpaeek. and Me� by abstracted from deeds and other pertfiwt Checked 2Al.--I* he- A.. W k, -4 - ffe p-d where Mown J, ft4 or -1,* P'"I. - -W.0a /. 4..~y pkt of =kwds. Ne 'WrMy /* consIstarlt wiffi that .�= hl Ma Of Ma -&A- of I-. Mnft. M. A=== -y -t Scale 11 - low wan -dd 1. t _t . W_ -ntzwl It �*v & Aff of 0. MI, h.V" h, MA, -y to ft &Yidencv. 7h* plot conforms to 27 VSA A. 0 Z?rien Home f crm .1 A. b-o;wy .50-hll- -d -ho- - .1" 1 My d4okWw m Um plait of -ey of boundary /h- section 1401 JEW= Date Moy " 201 90 . "'bot to ffe -Y -d Mvolty or A,* of -th.-fty of .0- .6-&- -dww of b-dby' lh,- for ovrf� my 0-tor or pm tan .6o "'aftm'd Me 140t of.6w to F-& LIWIod PrMwMe old Foley P.* R.Oy Copwalkn project 00182 1 Old tam Road South surIk7atm VMwl I ..6-..qverlr - 46f, h, If-td 1-ted by 0 4 AND - I ag�ry"YEWS, & Z41MMY conswUyng 11h.9ineers, Inc. /an A. .0WA-es L.I.S AKYr le4 Ifain Strev4 Colchester, Vermont 4954 446' 1,Ap,a.;nate m—M- renfvthg 112e A.r / \ Q-A Partns,shp / / Loscdo / n /'. / Lot d geb°d` vaxxaate farntAxr a� the B• ,wew- �—APa.arh,Ore ArcaNm 1 eb th9 B' \\Mhe \ \ --Inter ten with Kennedy DNve to be designed by MCFMand-Johnson •N WYndinq Brook �_t are focotA>n \ erbt/np 11' A.C. \ \ / tMAre /029r1en Brothers AgencX Ina Vat— 198 Pope J11 Walley Crory CandontmArm May 16, 196J W/u 2141 F g9 204 Na 70b A 1965 I Georgetown Homeowners Assoc/atbn \\ d I "•_ e�M� SAT-y��'B1 � ! '�� �s Farelst Park R"ty Corp. Fredertok J .F. Q \ : a /� i' Volume /42 Page 497 Mary Maher 1 -lP 1 August 24,, 1978 AxU_ 91 Page JW \ Rernahhg Lanais 'P 4,15 Arne Aopver zb; 1969 ` 1 0A71i n FOMNy Lhrlted Par67Bre*4P 1 \ Area = /59 acrele \ \ r \ � 1 r eaxewabr" \ 41 \ r rerun, lee Pb, " ss � � - ------------------ Res/denfM/ 7 Z.,Wng 1 .11° Da700d & - T /T ud f z 4 4 \ Sondra 1 A Randall t re J56 Pa Jll A'wfda'rG{a' .R �.. LA. nie Bent vman l Hopwood 1 e JeO 1 u1wrre f75 1 �Paw se! Pow Ss //!om dr Mado I gasr 4 1%5 ,A,tr2 /991 Reiner I "� r-------_ 40 A ' e 1B0 Pope 461 _ - _ _ ,1 uryrt ti 1982 1 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 Robert P. R/ss1 \ 1 Volume 199 Pops, 29 1 \ _ _ 1 � Nowrnba- l, 19Bi 1 ^----.�I - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 1 _r�;___f 1 1 1 Roy r nY ,4_ Dame/ J. R Leo ✓. ,A: O$r/en R-ld-tkl ! Zmhg Legend rn. EWsthg Rows, pale _i 12 s Yy Centro/ Pohe i- i� Edsthg hK*wt A Cotcu/oted cans,. Monumentotlan to be set at Oeneri dAectlon. w kon pjoe found O' 50' too' 2oa' Jno' an' Spa' - - Property /he Ex/sthg wood the Wetland setback Bar SCo% opila a? Rvace Dan/e/ ✓. B' Leo J. d: O8r/en AI-4 , \ r \ \ walla c Type ill \ \ Wtndr/dge Homeowners \ tt Association WA— 175 Pogo KM Feb7a y 2 1981 Astr'n _ 7a T� 0 PtawIng and Zonhg hhtrrnatlan Q w/e^/ rlpR/, ML• F"st Park Realty IQBB WWlst- Rood P.O. Box 1/84 Sa Ba/h9ta7, Vermont cl54Ar Residential 7 Z-h,9 lox Ponta t260-00200 rax PWCW 0970-00255 Sugortree rotal Aro - 69.1 auras Location Map N. rs \ FxbtMto Lot l/eoes pr{pasd Lot Qewe owe 7Awd'wre/op«, twe Lot Lbnrppee ter OWAw7 Name Fate \ Praoaea Rewtdev,t/d tkxe yr 104 *weld yl \ Lott Pdkhp/lP000Y l42" C,PBp at. 1JTow*--oTow*--2T Tow*-- - 417 IMRe /^\ L02 i \ ,SW ppoa aL L87reN79e B.7t9M0 at. f.9X 17.5r \ Mxukxr+gY - H (figs Totd Cowoye� F7mf MAX 6.1.E \ Let 2 (Si wrwll 1 - -Is, \ \ Pakbp/About' Awl at .vawra+tBlheloew 010. IS1X 2sx Caapsarrw0,400 Rl. 17.159 AM rbidr_ Jwd Cewage as, /r \ 41 \\\� \ \ Atw RO/ Mara acir9 aL ROW- of . Bess \ {w \ \ 1W aL 121X Total GBwwge N.ox \ \ \ Lef J AM (L41r We ) Rwnahhg Canals \\ ♦ \ \ Let a A,k ryi erwtl Formt Pbr* Realty Cusp. \ \ \ ♦ \ i' \ N_ Area = X 5 earve \ 4W \ \ \ \ \ SgOwry Lone 41 \ Burlington H/ty/wo}a tr Roods \ .I Powf IB12 l OW F` Rood , ----- ----- ------'--- �__-"� R,.t rlol ! Z.,Wny Dome/ J. & Leo d ,*, O'Br%n t. The locatfcn and moterids of existing uNWAYs is not warraftted to be exact or carnp/ete. The Contractor shol/ hWa /ocdte all utNRles and be "e/y mopons,154 for o// ex/s1/19 utplt/se end Melr unlntelrupted sencces. fie Contractor shall contact Dig Safe befb-e co nmencing any wok. 2. Mls plan is In no way a boundary survey. Lbmmer W 1 Z h9 2001 1 W. f and 3 Design M� Drown Checked Scale Dote MaY t zeal / precAvd O vera// P/an O Brien Hom e Farm FOR PERMIT REVIEW I ;6.� a e4 Co& -A ster, Vermont 05"6c �` 2 New 15" A a !! 1 _ .....,,_., 1 f2' yam: wrorm. -a�.,� -....-......_ if / ♦ + , / ! �..... V v. 324� New CB ' New CB '� / ♦ V�tla Y.pei'Ill ;''� \ / / Rim 328.8 1 Rim 323.75 �"'\ ♦♦ Hj 666666��� `r 1 �y z J M. 324.9 IInv J21.9 ,ia• "� ` ♦ _, r,� T A -Nf2 �' M. ud 32515 New CB { OF tic Nark I L3 1 2 `� /♦ \ rY • r.. \ 1 ! .� /, Rkn 3"..8 e / Inv. 3247 +I Mo9" v 11 •• _ ♦♦♦ / I �., /nud 32495 J SI/A Rim .75 _ ` New SWA ♦ 1.... I \ I 8 1 /nv out 63 SJ--, ?5.49 � /nv, we 325.J9 New CB N w e• a. 52 New hydrant Iv� ... i New sexrrr FF 3 Rlm JJ1.50 O.t wtar/.h ssemb/y ",oy1 -'. aeonout h 1 /nv 327.50 h v M4: 0;7 -4 r Nawca /•.. z �+1k JS�smitq"aeyrMw. _� /(. 11`-- I � r nM �a7 \ / j •- .~,� I� }$ i w26' ! l�k`a' aw utXA - - Y ACES 2i N.r gob \ \ E a s a r 0 a New hyd one ew ' RM J72.2 �' - =----h-• I� \ -, ostem¢Ly"' �-New r11 y4 5 N2�.o„ ' / � o �pw war„ ,, �, f �. f� \ er t 1 �•,+ end „N, ,•- � _ .\ I on (t 4 fast I I RWn . a75 -ts „ / \ ' • 3 V \ ew tea ao.•fa„ 334.0 N by Jzs. - a D 9 b � /. gate pcY � / a Oa 1 ©. 1 wtam2• 8aB O /'� '••' 11% ( l' New CB / I f 1 �w waaav 5 Q 1J Rim JJ150 '. Naw C9 + \ New e 339.of 327. I Rim 0 (� a 52 water Mew SW Inv. JJ275.. �� •p`� I ,a AO� i � f3 0. - \\ A .i.S1..58 Inv.. ud 333 N�,.120.0r �I /nv, h J2B 9? ytaww New CB 1• - + cp Anv. out 328.B2 I Rim J39.0 Fa f0 O $ ;. M. JJd 00 ta_� �! ew ce mv. ud J3325 � Nf s. Ot Rim g �7w I I 1\3 \ New Yord Oroln New CB ^b /nv, 7z I 1 ew Rlm 3325 Rim 332.65 In v. 32575 2 Y I ILx/sth ss Aynfnnf V • lnv. 327.0 morhd wr � ossemd/y �- � /• I�s 1 R,4n .729.7St .- �" O 'O. _ � k`\• . I ou /nu t J1e453 NewwFD _ Q k'im JJ8.0 6 _ -FP- AA.-mote I �� New smh ---- _ J6 q 1 loaatlon at ♦ y Rim J32 9 Q'�,� wa rhg 12" A.G Inv. h 322,49 �� @ 3*p... yri /' \ $ l wdhe a� New 3DMb29. Proposed Pak Area by ouf 322 J9 " 34D �' � •39 I Nsw 0 1 R/m 329.0 6 R a nv J29.4 /nv 32J4 ! ,t' Rim 345.11 New dea o� , � e 'AR 2 Inv.ht JJ581 1_ :.y } 3 __ -New tee New I O U M1� Inv J(T571 N CB v. ou\ V � ',,} vo/✓e. ew hyWnnb/r- t U ,A\? O �fe / � ��e � �2 New tapping �•- Rim JJ2 J6 ossem�!" 1• _ - '\ \ g' S/Oeva old /nv. J2818'-,7I� �i Is CB \ \ rxYve- /n v ud 32B 4J I' 4 1 0 'yQ H 3 N.r trr ^}!(ae�'' Q\ Rim 33d 0 \ New _W/1 _ _ Md gore I a,s / v. J0. 75 \ New CB _ Rim 349.7 I ns✓ inJJl99 l \ _ �_ 1 f 19 34g. 1 Rh" ft.SJ9.50 Inv. 344.157✓ \ Inv out 319. , ! a1}cb _ 4 s2 of - "� Inv. In JM8J /n v. ud 3444� [ > I --_ '���_ New CR g { r�Inv. we JJ37-T i Nw 00 storm Rim J34.2 "N✓� c \ s.a 07 l "`9.• ,,,,ya Inv J24.85 1 _ k9/%Ud Nsw 10•,0�,R azxag _ _..: ^^ Inv. ud J29.45 Rim 34 5 .(' 34s 8 0 \,.•/ \ 3hyo /:/% `�' v New deanout1 '•"�.� ;., A'rw `u warm -�, `i' !nv J387 dog, 42 ` u /nv J29.4 �,• - /2`MS:,Nr i'''rw'M w� lg '��. © New 1'k ¢ I ,.aabr � /nv ud 3J&9 I r Jo' 1 // sr --- :` . New C-„�!wn' 'sAaie `w` .� sv,�g7 - `' �,� - � \ - l� •I7 m (Uo.J 'i3 _✓e Ptr° 4! Rfi+� 36 _ New 5 tF M v 327 8' � ., �' � _ �N� -..T O /n v ud 328.23 '� �-� eqx _ - - ..,� -tom I New hyd-an New SYh ,r `ter` i Rijn 350 J 1 \ assembly Rkn J529 In✓ ud5345r5 1 \\ New SI/h Inv New B --- "- -�`� /R.. M J449 R/m .I.lIS52 �� T _,.-nwew r5. N w /5"wtmr, -_ \\ \ /nv !n .i11.5J �.¢kn New C)9 .i342 �.v/Wa ,ve,� /a R rau0v - 1 - __1 -. ,� /nv. out 344E \.583 Rkn 359.0 \ \ by ouf J?f. 47 /nv 329.45 In v. ud 329. iru,/nv 3dJ5 \\ \\ New Outlet '•� �"- /nv ud J54.4! New to hydrant 4 _ ' v s \ \ structure New End Section �M^\ �,�. �`�--a._•_ „yro� 8- \ ossembly� / l,}' 7 \ \ Inv J24.25 Inv. 3242 Or C19 'os- ,,3Q' .w e•"` �. \ \ Datanticm/Tisafinent ''� _ _NIz wry �Cp/ a' Rm J57 5 1 New CB-. -_ate _•'O1K N In. J57.5 \ \ Basin � Rkn 34J5 ` - "- 6pw B�fgc'" ! Aa - ram.. Inv. ud J57.75 In v. JJ85 13 Inv. ud '18.75 New CB "'tire -era, n382.4 ` New CB - Iv n v. ud 35805 �, \ \ Rim 3590 - Nsw Sllh f.; .. M.354.0 J Rkn h v. 36JC75 •}` ud 354.25 - � lnv. In Ner ct 05 I Jsaos Inv. ou -- Apprax. Property Lkte .p, Ex/s8ng P.- pee NoLeaw August 9, 2001 buedergq gradha Poothg d-h, mph B/9/01 Ex/ltA1g NbfM L.h./prltl Im/H 11P ..Una 4, 2001 -W. c 6n / around bash 6/4/Of 5aRey Ca,ad Parr Dote rwH d Des 00- lriecked bare - w- -sew - Propwed lwfer Lh./gate dw 1. The e exact and mia/plais of existing atAlffes5* /s notold wa�mocate // PROGRESS PRINT �( E.dsthg AitYont to be exact scamp/eta )hs Contlactor sho// HNd /xofe a// Design ' / �' 9 Stonin /WY-XY\/1 Exhmy tree Ike 9 p,.ggwsed Ili~ uerllies and be solely rev*uwe for al exlstArg utwiss and v t///t P/o/7 - ton Jire% rryyyr `rv`rvr� O.MW awl, I& y4-*'b cvub st9a they unhtenupted servk The Contractor shd/ contact Dig Drawn fA/P/SHH Safe bsloro eommsncmq work. p ExLsthg Serer Lhe/mmho✓a o Conaste monument POD setback any o' Jo' Checked BO' 120' fBa' J . i Z. This p/ar is as no way a boundary survey. _-� Scale O Brien Hain e Farm Proposed Sewer LAte/moMae O /ron p{oe..W "�" prq°°s°d paws r°°de/pakmg -sr--p - Existmg Storm Lhe%tah bosh - Orohaw raw Date abr t goof ®aST®ST-fl- Proposed Storm LkWlWtoh bosh 377rb Fm1sh grade spot elowtion _ Prgooeed adewoat/bAn Path u - Prgvotad ands-d-oh �. BAR SCALE Re'v i OO1B2 pd Form Rood Sarth Buriin fat !/ermcv/t 0_...�-ExiNhgCwtaa• o Lyt poet PDPOT°dborh9 atmr 1' - Jo e9S & LANSING Consulting engineers, Inc. d Lontaar Alain Street, Co&Aesterr, Vermont aS"6 y\ / r / 1 �A / /lit,/ - v / `` / - - - - - � I �r I O I ` �� \wte / 4 ..sodomy- — \ \,; I/ f:\ I y ,"^--mac �'+•.. --- � tiM, 7 , ., � / II ` o9^°tic /'.. 1 �.��( "-..,��= •�"='` `.`` //�/iX� ass= �. '"l ! III �5 ooedwekbdo st _ta (7p.) sea datorR � � // I o � �-.,., ..���c /t'i�-ice=� •� II I /�V I 1 k� v•.�\ i / I I I/ I: � j I f.J / �f°: <, w` A ,Ua-_ -aaY-^-^ "�`^\ �'_, �\ � �. � d(hrl ✓' \t 1 I� I "�'a3 \ - J II ce+ao ' � 1 i I .`� � // � �`� �,,�' �I �,\ /dam �\�\ � .�. I� III _ .,,• I / n I I � it ��gt} � . / O I ` I I �J '1 � a brief /� \`,:J I / "- � sir a.,ce\ III I I i \ �,• II \ +T sxs_� \jy��,,� •• I I j \\ �p 'iA ` / �r+,ed l / ass+---- / I I t I I �I Iill i 'G\\ � / // \ l � ,` \\�� � r� / �.--•-,,- __ � 111 - \\\\� \ I '_ 1-_.I Y'1 1 / _ `t6,. i��• �i/ \\\t Q� � t __'•./' •�..'7`^y-.._�......._ I / _.... sc `~ au _ \ . ' \ / / ���'' � � "��-.. � I�yl _„" \\.1 \ .��. 19 ,,, P sled Pwk Mara � / 0 a O 1 O / \ / / / / �� ep /. / / 4�, •o \.\� ® \y I I LI Xa \\ I tonsbucLon v .,�.� -. 111 I / / ... _...- �at2, Q ''fb V r4. 1 v vV� /� dell /���\ � _ y0 , X`- 1 _ \✓ �\ \ / � I I I \ '' _ \ Z►,-- �� \ \\ T"�11 I \ _ �.I'r glue man __34 _ `�•. may/ \\ \\\ \\ \ \ \\\\\'�\ \ \\ \; \\ ♦,.��\\\\\�\ Bosirr e�+� ii�%%i �i/ // / /I� L_rG �+.� __.. 1 a•J R /fit / e><a2 .,-Z — _ � I N / / ^-- / � -- \ \\ ���• � _ --- ��95� � emir rd _, ` I r,d - - — App✓ar. ArVrty Lhe .Q, Eesthg pow.- Pa. Nola Aup,.r e, aoof b„adhga p�mhµ Ioofd g roca4,' e� Bd-✓— Ex/sthg Nbtr fd,e/gate HCYrr _Ira .lane I, 21W eroe/m canbot wound bosh — _ Surrey Contrd Print HotAde roe/on confrd 1. the focotlon and matertds of "IstArg utd/ties /s not warranted Date r Wd Oesabt/on " CYrocka/ vote Proposed �,xtr /k,./gate raw &./ethv b)vhwt to be exact or aamplefa the Cwlt tar stall nerd locate a/f PROGRESS PRINT le Ex/sthg true /he Prod ludra,t �----� Sgt fence erosion control MUlties and be solely responsible /er of/ ek/strlag utA/Des and Design Md4 / ryyYYYYYYYYY aean0V Onto ab g trot st theh anhtenupted sxwtces. the Conbocta- sbdl contact Dig Drown fA/P/sNN Grad%nq & Egos%on Contra/ Plan-Stonington C%/C/B Cpas+d aP safe he/" commenchg any wank — — 4--0- E+dwty Sewn Lhe/monhcde o Caicrete mowmant PUD 'Psfack Checked � s o Proposed Serer LA»/monhde o /roe pbe y s.Y. Z this plan is in no way o boundary survey o fza' !bn' 6T—f] — 0010W Stale Lhe cotch basin �. Lhahoge Aow ° hg DateScalO Brien Home Farm ®ST®STD Proposed Slam Lhe%atch basin M7x5 FWsh grade spot dewtlon FY poeed sMewdk/6.f4e poth Date war L soar —ua cn Proparsd undrdroh T sip•, Pro ct 00182 _ J��-- Existhg Cato, ¢ LyN past —FO �— Arqp_d �tl�q own BAR SCALE t' - .w' "Zps & IINSING Consulting engineers, Inasa.rn BOrfm tan uaamont Proposed Costaur ... ... 4 164 .L(a%n Street, Colchester, Vermont OS446 e 0 1 ' ® I I� 5 i 1 , Coster III 33, 0 113 j /e �I © 1103 J It e QD � I 1\ ® ® ® Q 15� v_ / \ i CJ ® i / o ;t 10 �,565 is 1 c Proposed Pon* Arco '!1 _ - `>' rp ® ® �^f J4O � ���/// a� JD � Q � ---�.:�' el,. _ '•."`� - � any 19 3u• 8 ' A t voles q _. _ _-•*-_... r ' "_ - -__ ® r O t..� Q o 4r p � _ ` „ - -® tlo p 3 � at \\ \\ ® to \\ \\ Ltoentv ♦ \ \ - - i 401NMG PLANANG .SQSfED"—Starhgtae CW* Key /S~ AMr. AUNT NAw Mr LIM cost i total $ ® 1 46 Red pme 8-10' 150 5900 2 13 SO— 8-10' 200 2600 3 14 Birch ISO 2100 4 32 crobopple J. 175 5600 5 22 Blue spruces 10-12' 300 5500 6 20 Columnar oaks 2 112' 220 4400 7 12 Arborvitae cedars 10-12' 150 Iwo re 8 30 sea green Junipers I gal. 35 1050 9 15 See landscaping note I8-24' 350 I 5300 Londscov/ng Notes Aa,t a 2001 b0dhgy g-odlnµ loafing d-In p ±. t• Each bu is rioted o /a brld�gegt t zso. M n is /oadseopv7g »ff, .I— 4, 2001 e-oa/ cmbv/ arward bash rn 6 0oty —*d D'°f A' "k`° go, Mmanwg induob.• sea groan iunNe/a onbYcvey roterer spmeo, bumhg Dueh hyd�ange2 "a p PROGRESS PRINT ..:. mlOo pina aoso `a, bouts � and rood. Dwign Nye Landscaping Abh — Stonington Circle Z. For londscaphg along Naves Avenue see Alaster LandscopAag Plna by TJ, Lloyle. Drawn tUP/5•NH 54310 $ 9rwd total 0' 30' 60' IM, BAR SCALE 1' - 30' / RJp rap I I Y°'11' R1y N07E.• - d/spersd pod I dispers �� • � I / ' �- f ? pad �iremg se.w- ��,� As rlltwaectlen of 61e pfwoded road w%th Match Line / / �I- ;Y,, i RM .4r New sMn Kwwedy UNw fs show? for N/uetrotlw arpoma Georgetown Mv. M JiSss Rim J2f,25 'et d y AltesectAon w7RY be b ot�wa II ,•�` � Rio 324.4 1 hrNew CS f x /r"'�\ t \ My aut m5 sr Inv. /n Jf614 \ ?yT,r try New E, Inv. out 316.P4 II /nv 32L2 .p. - aDo s> \\ ec,Jon `` / s New End / 319:0 3• P1C ,gy! 'YS lo� / III p i .rt N• ,-^. 7 New outlet l \\ ' \ Vie• ��n/J \ Nbatn / I I structure 11 etjc / I �tOR3>.a5 / \ Rat r sor rg \ .\ Main' ,�i, /-� / ( / \ \ � water service New Rm 326.1 I I s IYM ,rr {r. t? � � J at-14-t l \\ - Georgetown / In,. ud J!1.35 J Stamwent - 9e I 12 ��/ ew CB l ,n pp5' � ✓ � Rkn 324.4 oetenflon ' v if rc' /nv 32f. / \ ' I /niv 3221 t5 'Y )M'�" I i New SMh ' / II :.�p3+o w. avt .va�.n ., ` only Rim 3133 tars" , r t o`v New End / e uw le• taiga \ Tl� $ /nv. out 37B 02 I I I a x NtI , rrr" Section / �.' _ M« .sure 1 New L r i.N IDi�'�5 „y+x; ... /nv. 3f95/ \ 1n R!m o�� sFg.�g \ Rm 326.7 3t. ( II !nw' X9 3227 Inv 322.$-'�`t ,'4 �,_q I !pb /',. a »`�:,,t.`i� .•a- `i o i�� New h roof T dP 4''S 1,k...: a �� / �I Vow �` wy t / mote osscmb/y/y .,� 1 �.,.y ,.,.I>> f Y r . . , rap w✓w -.. Match Line _ _ disperal pod I: I �' I r III sp i' New or I o° dsanout;.awl I 'I/�"� / P9" � �:. � /nv Jd7. JO - . lam '4r � �a S1 wins I / III \ F III New Oot/et l / Wetlendrype ll o3 structure / (� °� 324.0 / / � �. t4�l �1 �� ll� ..?\ _ � Lei ►mod / LSta-mwater / N 6'O.t`_!' ".Q' \ ' - - - - Approx. Property Une .n, ExMthg Power pole Delentkxr/ // '� a 52 W14, Q - w- - Bow- Existing Nbter Curs/gate w/�sa 12 f. w Sk* -i sut ev Cartrd Point I\ T /� Basin N t f a\ Rh? J2&g \ / -w- - W- Hgeosed Mbar Chs/oats vWw "Milt-9 Ayaf w t \ New End /ne out 321. P-Porsd Aydront '\ Section / �. ' . Y. 324.5 M \,,- 4 rWWWYYWI^� LYearhg /units awn,' z New CB \ +� rJ - - -6--� Ex/sthg Sewer Lure/manhole Prcprete on stop Rim 32BB OJ \ ('tvrcrefe monument '\ Y i rspa In, 324.9 \ \ `t Ca d \ ;"! i ��5�•- Proposed Sewer Lhe/manhole O Iran pipe 4 4 -N12 Jnv ud .725.15 I s-aarl , Ge -st-ExlsthQ Stwm Line%tch basin r Orahog* flow Proposed storm Lllr%otch basin 777.5 Fkn*h ¢-ode spat e/erotion Riw Ce New -tan uD- Pr osed underaFoh m 32B.e 0 hyaWont {.. ap S4I7 Inv. J24.7 is v d u324.95 FF asser»Aro %% Exafurg Contour O Light Post In 1 ^ ew CB _-� �ew ce -ate Prgvwed Contour RIm 329.E I Noybop evaskxv control e I / Rim 32B.65 _ pr /n Y. J235 ' S'N aso o1 j1 324.65 �� q vd parod rooda/par*h9 M fe w-orlon control New CB Proposed sfdewdk/Adre Path R/m 331.1 A �a 57 Yn ` I - _ _ _ - _ _ _ Nowv PUD setback E 3 MY. 32s, // vowt F ' ,/ ' nv�.7407 -- New svwr ` CA"n .-tY"".^of /S1.x42' �•--�+t Note.Sr New hydront� \ \ "¢ai t4 6 tbQ `yj1"' `=-s,``' ° I. fie location and Materials of existing utbit/es is not warranted 0 to be exact or cam efe. fie Controctar rind/ f!e✓d locate d/ Iv\y 5`' Y ter' p'2,. \\ �k \. / / l r theutllir unhtm'ruptedand be ~ess 7ht a for al t a Conbnctorshall contact Dig Safe bsfore commencing any wonh. ding .. f, ;.. (, 2. fi!s p/an Js ur no way a boundary survey. Ltd i aw.. fee an Qafe. vdty. Now 0 New SNh New sewer Rkn 33125 I I \ \ e\ tNre.52 5 -Dtx8h/nv Inv. JJ275NewCB Ri33D vohv3132.25141' . - t �/ Inv. ud `310 a' Jo' 60' 1.1' 180' e• \ New CB .82 ,..I a RIM JJ9.0 \ 5 Inv JJ3.00In It Id J3325 �✓ Y'W. ���, ,r � ' �,,, BAR SCALE 1• '� v \ a New CB ," `r- ' ' - 6 Rim J27..5 New aewer� Cleanout J74.5 +! ,' kw J2372 In Ai 324.75 4 ^ •I --- i •' / '� iG �b a / , / creaked oa v I August 13, 2001 mrt baam m At Date -Wind D--pti- Design M✓B „ S k ��+%.tom Drawn FMP%swr+ �%t%�%tf/ P�OI7 - LO/IGCXS� w \\ Checked _� 7 scale 1 O Brie *j ome Fcn Date N Y 11 2001 New leeMat v I ?�° { Pro' ct 00182 Q'd Fomr Rood Sa+M Bur/' tar t• --- - FOR PERMIT REVIEW xBS LfNSINC Cons2cltang .fnyaneers, lnc. -. -""- >64.i/aan StroW Colchester, Vermont 6PS44B No Text NX j O$rien Brothers y 8{ 4 ud a fee Page 314 Wel%s/af' "'•••.'w Noy 16, 1987 Cond"' In/uM / lbWW214 Pops203 {{ CPA Partnership �•OJ� �o� / \'-, ".,,...,,rPz �0pd'/ `~ ,.. IN � {.6 '' fo• aa� arrNr - � / scownent to Arocn �• womroh P-w ABPOM7E to MPOW/W M7 �14 A W N 60. Area lot8. "0 A QY acres Lauds / Ji�^'SfAa `rJ r � r 1 r Curm IA l J �7 f / /✓'J •ter PLYAW h .TnW-�-- 7VDW' / f .- Fir , y off, L_,9S Ie• army- \PMA L- � Monfort POww �'� li 3 ��C. o 8 o a5 O FiederlcF d y V ; 1 e May Moher a V.6 9f Page JJ9 r, Augaer 2$ 1969 Fcrmon d' Joyce > �i // B011ydeaU J w✓xne fee Poge 92 Nowmbw 1, 1962, ` \ O-Fz1 to CWIo \ y SOM94N0 8,Q4' 3'w Remaining Lands 09rien Family Limited Partnership Area = 15.5 acres o-vzi 1g'� MT17509-W lPro7 _ _ L9� a"3 I Obnord & 50574:i2"W Sonata Rendo// 2 e 3n Pat. rk lwmew 2,9 Stevan & A-4 l O Voldmon �o Vavme t-� ..Ny Poge 564J7, 1991 175opwooPoge 56 P7 t Ad, 2, 196/ f f 1 f WiRran & Modo ' 0 Table of Bearings qh Qfsttmces !' B a'tng L7igtanee CAC 'v to 96#w N4570540, t l9' to raw S40WYBlr 14%/ ROMP le M7MPCJW 5,7--- e4 ♦ f Georgetown Assoclotlon, h7a rd a 123 Page MJ Sgotem 26 1976 f RowPt7sAl Ar h O nu / A- •S,. ffi 1 Jy`. f'lerow2 Nj9.O Nsalrlr � hdudW An& - 400257' ( tskw) `( M.Wed Angb - 7271'45' 01-bw) \ 1 1 � s'I \ WlndhgBradr CondamMwms Asumo'nK NP't +r.'.'r.. .. \ to Table of Curw Doto for Cunt /3 RC471 to Pahl Ct w Lw•lgn/ RbeWs (neWed Angle 1 w To ROMPCJW On' 11AW' 457135' :Avk ROMPCW ro ROW -TX Mgar l7Sa0' a1571'J5' \ Table of Beorxlgs and Distances Une BrorAfq Oktorcv Rompaw toRowrr N17S7n297Y ,3448' MP7W e. Lo7211 N467o IO2' 2411' ROWDE to RO~ hWWIdr W 2.XI2' A~ ro CWII WfW'401r 2415' 3'�• eh� sr—t- —r_-!r'•i -"7 20m \ Kennedy Orlvarw rh. b -oe of theof South fl-fingtmAugsf 1, 1964 \ \ VW_ 56 P 4e7 A t 19 1964 Planning and Zoning Information Owner/ Aoplkbflt,' forest Pont Reaty & OVrlw Fa»9y LAMNed Porto I&" Wt4/s(- Road PC Box 2184 .Sa 8lydhgla7, ✓*runt 054W —zour?"Wrlct— Resid-IA,i 7 Z-kg rox OwcW (260-00200 rax Porte( a970-00255 -Ar0aA-_ rotd Aron - 645 oasa Vdume 7J Poge 15 Ady 24 104 56075 Z5 £ color p'ti / �2 \ Ibhwne 7J Pogo f6 Augaet 2LI 1%4 • OU99 Ydwne 7J Poge 17 septembw 1, 1964 to1a.1 O 1v 5ltgortree Mrs ,V, �9Y1 E \� o Cmdomkl/ums _ Note.• _ 6Q40 W/ndridge Homeowners \ 1, See pion ar tlded Boundary Surroy, O9/en Hand Form, O'Brien A r�,� Low Associotlon Family L1m/tsd Pa tnersh/p and Forest Pali- Realty Cap.' doled ryr h ` V11 me 175 Pp, 42e •kcna y" 2001, prepared by Krebs d' Lonscnq Consult/nq Engineers 24 19W \ Inc. fcr camplets bavndcry h/wmotlaf. Lece/J d_ f \ —'3 y �.5t'f Low p7"1B y{ W� \ 51Z Lend Nr. 7— Open Area = 2.0 acres \ SOB77'J4'ly - � �560J'O?01q \ cofsv 4839' c ` \ eeerrwrt ��•� \ 1 \ ♦, \\ Remaining Lands \ 7'otal Area of Forest Park Realty Corp. Forest Pork Realty Corp. '+ and OBrien Family Lim/ted Portnershfp Area = 34.5 acres parcels is 68..5 Acres { ee15YJ' Lot 2 Area - 5.0 acres 5051421591W wAee awcwwr bm bwwel a o. Sadh Awhgtm 1 Wr4N,er I 11 P1as Y — IbhA /tJ0 Poge 48J R A1tHGP,t2 ANSw .. - 275 00� - RYA6wW I �IMP } Z tw rlas i._._. i NO �p Robert P.Poge i s 1 i I k"ti„M1M1 1 �,(H ✓dome 6B Ryo173n 1 y N (� Or Docambe!9, 1%3 Q N/2 87028"W 6 ©'�� .::'.., Vd me 6Page 274 �$ Obcwnbw 14 196J flag _ - ✓dme o1211 Pope I52 Apr9 !9, 7-m - _ Old Form Rood' RrAvs� SIOSS IS mpg - RY= Don/s/ d & Sondra D W a A' Leo_ J Boundary Notes 1. The deewp6wre of ffi~ brae eW Me evV- 1orored oW wxtsthg m the rwrW wws c�a7pomd and ma>"d to Provide 0 lird bavlxkry most hokxl/w o/ Me olghd .bent of the m ew cm6kts berweme ph/wk5a'b -d Mrtm mWd- m•r -A t-tld, d-.!, md/w docv I. sSoWd be --id d fo dhnhwte my a of 141 a- cmekf. 2 Wdx t. how ben set h and m th. gwurd w5- B/I.- m the prat of y .t-4 k, Me ,i kn o/ Me >ur ,-. R wm needed to .s5ow a Amt 1W ob w-*o ma f d J 71re boundwy GfermhoNm OW bomdwhe Hoer are W- "JW to Me --y " 1ega9ty w toot of ouM nr of p y 9rmtw w 9-t- -e, f-d M. n�a'rt of nasty ro p Y,-Ww w cLYro'wrM ,Ipwwfy w 1OW, k oR.cfW 4 Any 6oundwy d.rmmhrotfm, bae m d;t o w d -ts -*d h the pad✓k ream ds by xOkh MAP a rA*& were Cos � to Ms 023im f ry Lkn/1W ParNwHp and ,-t Port Rarity CerywoNm w MA, w np5rs A,/mm o1 M. oWA., jr and ,--fy Lhww P.-o-1 tweet Pafi R"ty Ca7W&Aan wwe ob--Aa 4Wheote4 b a AIW to Me ommxy and bgd/ty or Nose deeds w doalmmts IMere !hare e-tl w aocumnts we in-R.Yy a -i'd - o moor of / w -1oh, wrcrs w onbs/me h ket w cmtoh w aro eased up- wrnneaue coxJuvars of /or, Mn Nr. ArokafW ea'ndrl a -OY nol G MhR S Any d pktkvr m Me pkts of swwy o/ bamdary gnu F YMw of tcm awcAlarw of eoundwy lhu Ar 08dwr y [bmYW Po-fn«a1Ko an0 Fwsst Po* RSWty Cdpwotkw wero /anted er IorAeolrroby 6. the -tot of 65. e(f t of odwrar po .Ma w other juw, oWn4 /f Mrs b w w my, how ban /daatN7W .hero Anwn. ro Mot eW- 4 M.- plots of - Ie may be wbjrt to y mA1nNRW doing w rt h& Ae ptl- fir corx! and octu Y mr k.0c~ m Mb RW of mr n 7. lhh yot of w...y Ls f- Mr sd. usw of O7Abn F ky Lhmr d Podnwsh/o and Fwuf Pork Redty CA,-Ikn -d Me use by oMw ProA-Hy oener>•. Parole w -A*& b -F-Ivc-/y unwbter/rsd. A AI of Me lots hrok ded h NO. =r y. we slbjat 10 Me c Nt- and rrotrktkvre hWa•d by Me SMIe of Y t Lmd U o '1() I- P-evcbb. Porh (Na 4CO54e aura omww5nnts). Deed References lb/ume &valor C.vntee & PW Dote D-W 1 ovd- a Leo OW - to 01V•Nn Fmrky Lmm d P-h-bp &V/J46 O-wnbw- X. 1907 a*/ arothe s fe F t Puk Redty 1421497 Aupof 24 r979 Nwtha R. Fi't-m- ro ON- &,Ih- IJ9/145 Abumber 2E /977 Rabwt P. Rym to 02W. tb M- IJ5/117 Ab-,*W 22 1077 Estate of Leo oBri- to L- J OZn6i , ... and D-W d OVIAn 48145 fXfobw 14 1958 dudingeon Highways d Roods YWme 1 Page 1 506:U4J-W 1612 _ a', fwm Road 49.94' Dame( ✓. A' Leo J. A: OBr/en O' 30' fad' Q/Y 20p'�'` pJOO' W. Eristwlg power Pde �.}.}},,, ty C"c)—.d Poh( e Cdcu/otsd asp +tr; /� y A }d no monumsnto se y1 • bon pje/ph found O iron ph to be set at owner o7saetion ® Dr9! hde Awnd ■ concrete/gron/te monummnr round a Concrete monument to be set at a-" d/screNan Ol1ts/de boundw-y line \ Lot boundary line Eor ement /ins \ PUO setbocF line Exrsrinq wood /Are Sramwot- eosemenf or" o� \ 9� \ \ Kennedy Orlm city of south Burmgton \�Mfhpne 66 Poga 469 d,2 4 1, 7964 4 W.- 56 Poge 487 Au9-1 Iq I%4 &bk-. 73 Pg. 15 .Ady 2.5; 0, 1 \ VWu1ne 7J Pope 16 SWI- - . 54 19 \ � \ ✓dome 7J Page 17 Sgotembw 1, 1%< 41, _ k �lq J t 271, 50' i�0 4 40 W r' p♦ Ctty of /f5Nw#O " AAy 2$ / l A/aBank s Asbon=crt� l - fjfj jfj t /0Banrien 89e Jrooell { 08 Wellesley Grove AA,, 19,, 1983 Condominium Vdume`214 Pager 20J No pbnber d�1985 APP'arhnef. /--Ikn 1 �� ♦♦ ��. 1 CPA Partnership CIA o � � , r ,. Iw a •oryr�,, u Lot 1 47 Units Georgetown Association, Inc. Ydume 12J Poge J5J September 24, 1976 ♦ •"' �F Lot 2 64, Units 1 jf) rv, it n�Fr,' �.(�,r�'rs�'aat tr / �-. .� �• ,7 r i l `�F Lot j :y n Fiedrlat ✓ J. � � � � � i ': . & May o' r.. ocev,. f 6. c7tt Maher 1 .6� ` I--ofsin aw gt � sty Vd me 91 Page JJ9 August 22, 196.9 $ Formen & ✓OXO �BOUrdBOU �' r i Y.1 m 186 Page 92 4' l Norovnber 1, 1982 ' 1 . � � $ \ Remaining Lands O$rien Family Limited Partnership 1 Area = 155 cores 1 Total Area of Forest Pork Realty Corp. and OBrler7 FoTr�i/y Limited Partnership porc s !s 68.5 Acres Resdn,tid 7 Z-hg ,R Donald & 1dc,bw 4 Zan p `.� Sando Kendall � '^------_. ncs' ? zw, 1 Vd me J55 1 l I ReMdalfb I Iyayg ....... ••,•,••�.•,,•.•.,.. ,....+ Page Jll............✓r Na 1991 .$levee & Anniel t , . ..,,........... ..>s...,.................. ...... �o/dman I �"a/y'VolHopwo564 d a 175 Pays SB 1 1 ./u/Y Z 1961 1 Weiner 1 —' Ydume 180 Poge }` Aftgy211 796? Robert P. Ryon t I ' Volume 66 Pogs 27J P/onn/ng and Ionia /nformationZonaro tn�otion Ow7er/_Ct w,1115ton Road I- Fao/ly PatnMa/i(, 'waseira/ with K&wwy FPkodty & OV [bolted MIS Ngdston Rood Ad! Dtlyetv �QO 0 by P. a Box 2184 -0 Sa 6urthgtom Vermont 054OJ K �d Zo lny D/strict.• g D dun ,;Fo ResA*Wk/ 7 Z-hg 0� o \ Tax Party' 12W-00200 Tox Pa097red 0970-002500753 \ 1YAG Arse South Burlington tat Area - 685 oaes 10 1 Kennedy Dr/w \ 03% — City of South Bu/hngton \ \ \ kW-. 66 Pop. 469 August 1, 1984 s 65 Poge 467 August 19, 1964 ✓a4xrre 7J Poge 15 .Wy 2y 1964 \ IhNme 73 Poge 15 August 2Q 1964 \ YaJ .7J Poge 17 Sept-ber 1, 1964 Location Man Type II Type III `Hy \ tL r.S r .• Su1��w'w'y' W/ndridge Homeowners\ \ Ex1sUng. Lot usage. Lot CosCos Association 3. 14xume 175 Pog, 42B \ *b.~ICbtn rxa /b/., Rewek PR f PFa PbM lfA4?eo a6 "- Octal.- zQ 19e0 k _ ..y.'•"i ,,, ^„�..-^' \ \ \ \ S • \ Proposed Residential Units.__ 7o1w - 107 U+N, tot 1 7 .r»wse. - 47 colt, �� may. lJ,I50 aL rom A dAhp ' SKOW at rot., Ceres - 7754/o tL - flJ alww tot z Lot cowve A.i?/ 94 R l•d 1J4a d fT Amdt�gyoMJ �♦ q \ `O� Amwld tot 2 Mx(Nonry - 60 /l�\ ♦ gnze�/ nN . I gist .Acorn/# unfit, \ g. - 2M0 r 60/4 1u \ . sluocee 1-dE Flwd) ♦♦ \, APR 10 2002 Remaining Lands Forest Park R.aCorp. \ \ \ -Pe \ S City of ""Q" 8urlin to Area = 345 (7 acres ` \\ ♦ -P Kennedy A w \ Clty of South Bur/ingtan Decwnbv 19, 198J 1 Burlington Highways & Roods L - - i' • ?Vame 66 Poge 274 V,/u I Page 1 t L4cemb- 2Q 196J 1 1812 -•ram - - ��' �� 1 �Yd{yn 128 P.P. 4.52 1 ad F— Rood Kennough Daniel J.& Leo J. v. —} GatwO�fM1 0$r/eo - — — — — — i Legend .p, FXSthg power Pole -� 12 Survey Control Point Fx/sfhg hyctont A Calculated cane. Monumentoticn to be set at owner's dtractlon. • kon Ploe found 0' 50' 100' 2A7' JCO' 400 800 — — property line Exerting wood Ike 7s" W H—d setback Bar Scale NO tes: 1. Me locatlon and materials of existing ublit/es is not womonted to be exact or complete. fie Contracts shall 1Wd locate aff utilities and be solely responsfi/e far a// existing utilities and their unhterrvpted scvires fie Controcts shot contoct Dig Safe before commene/ng any wok. 2. Ihls p/on /s In no way a boundary survey \�W/ume 66 Page 469 August 1, 1964 4 alums 66 Poge 4B7 Au9-t 1R IM4 KA1 73Poge 15 A g 2$ 0, 1 \ Wems 73 Poge 16 Augtl,f 20, . 19 \♦, \ /b4ime 73 Po" 17 Sbotetrrbr 1, /964 4' \ �� d Form Road D0� or Donlet ✓. & Leo Ace. o$Afa txmn,.•rkr 1 zanrg .Y axy 29 f / MelahOnt9 .... Book FOR PERMIT REVIEW S. 20M tight o1 e y wy 24 200A a,at Plot ,ubratta t 144 200/ Lats I and J 180' I I I I I � I I � I I Note: The proposed /nt"oct/ovn dedgn of Hlnesburg Rood, I I Hoywa Aye 4 and Moto'/owoy Street has been prepared PROPOSED CROSS SEC770N' by Lomcroux & Otektnson Consu/tmg Engneera /na fits (3J it' IEL LANES W17H 4' SHOULDERS I design /s conceptual and o Mat design wall be prepared after reco of of conceptual cil l from the State of Q Vemcnf Agency of rransportotlon. I I 1 ' (A I� 185' -777--71"/ 3: I eeo �-/ - ----- ------------------- i�-----� il- w II 3A�sse s�3 er vt: 'g.,. xq. � sw ' I Appro . Property Llne .p, Ex/Sift po— pate w-- — — Existh Mbler Lhe to W. � e, 9 ego -iLi ,wrwy Contra Point ►1'W— Proposal Mbter Lk/gat. vw. Ex/ethg hPol /VYYYI(-Y� Ex/ethg tree Me rv( Proposed hurt �z r ry-y YYYYYI 47ea»g /hrife 1y Proposed curb stop 4-6, Ex/ath r s 9 Sewer Loelmonhale m 4osrnefs monument y �5� I Proposed Sewer LhalmonhoM o hm prpa —sue Exkting Storm Lrr rvtch bash -. C vk?oge Aow NO te:—,sr—Sr_D- PYapoasa' Storm Lkre%otch boah 337.5 FW0 trade spot a/o-t/on /be prgoosed Intersection design of Hhesburg Rood,—lm---uo— rot'goosed undord ah T Sign Hayes A�wnue, and Mago'/oway Street has been Prepared-,.�.}�� '-wwng Contour 0 LIght post by Lomareux � D/cklnson Consu/flog Entmesr; /nc. fits dselgn Is conceptual and a /hal design will be prepared - - 33e "- ` Proposed Contour 180' 41r offer receipt of conuptuol approval Aran the State of Hoyods eraskn control - Ve rnant Agency of rmnspartothn. � �apaasd Paved roads/pakint Silt lance Bros/an contra Prtpoasd paved s%dewalk/brke path AArchasologlcal sena/tNe araa - - - - - - - PUD setback -.- - - - y_ .Aww hose barrier Match Lln ;ts - ..� J/!t> Notex Au 1. fie loaotlan and al of existing utlitins is not warranted to be exact or canplete. fie Contractor shall Aeld locale al/ utiitlee and be solely responskle for all exist/ng utiltha and •p, theh uninterrupted services. fie Catractor shall contact Dig gepr v xug t1' Sole behvs eanmenchg any worts. a 3 *'_` qor anA maw ss• t a 2 fits plan Is h no way o boundoy survey bv, b bv, ovt j1J.J JJs.Jg Z All water rdotsd work to be performed in arcordmce with the "$ie fkotlans and Detalls for the /nstallot/on of Water _.._,a — art asw //nes and gapurtenonces for o// falter Systems Owned by the .— — — — -.--s _ - Chanp/om Water Oistrkt the G!y of South Burthgton, and a b„ fen, J s7-I p4 the Alloge of ✓erlcha " ,.o.oas `New End Sectlon hw i? form Inv. 32f..Y � 1 13�NN��,NI Daronwo.wt °0E1gn M.6 Utility P/an — Stanington Cil-c/e Drawn _ APISVW cneckea 120' scO1e - �' O'Brien Home Farm Date fie, 14 soot Project OD182 I Old Form Road South Burlier ton Vemont BAR SCALE ,•=3D' FOR PERMIT REVIEW jPi4TBS ee LANSINC Conrultirtq I'f{�eneers, tree. °- ""- 3A - -- --- F/6-0 ffa£n Street ColcleeSter, !'ermont 05446 fl== I don cMbd (rx• / / earn d \f I / l .t� '323 = •.. , JV. ..w a 1 / ///�er��• ,ssu. � s�Y��. \`��,�:. �`! kr i�'`_� -vTB. �.... �`.. R /� iTgy � < fir% � ��a�fo .;�5r % r 1 I -II�[I 0 I 1 ]ir-$� S � ."�"� � i a� M - �F� f,a,Y, • a R�... = £N � / � \ 1 I �u \ r fr Y,.,...w..✓ �' ; 1 � / i _..�o, e.c�rk--s� - "M ir" "� . ' .,. /I Jr:- ' - -. ?Y.`"�. ''c ��ii;�t�� �n 3s €.�. �1� � \,b \� r ' •-% + .- of :Y �. t {iu < e�Cf ,. -'tfi:� '<�•rv: 1 �?".;; /.. l ~.. .,s,/,''^ s• s .� 014 n x ., rs .�4.....n � �r��. ..: e:3st 3t e ,�,..�,1. "� .. �"i�� �,....., ' ... �v A, .ziz�s .>� s�lorhn bath / ti'r 'i'` M mohtokl uotl d — l ®� \a�i, ... '` tie rr"r;,-''➢Y'r �" x to k . y �,� ,z ay k f k W";y,c a 3 u s t _ RIn I _` + �Y+'^ - �`"..a* � l"•z'`�,*nk�,> s' � '§' Fry �� t"�' y,°r"y4 9zzz0 N ZZ �•�'�/ \\\\\\\ -� _�_�-_- ��'�~,.-_mow~- .i.�\ - 1'•,• Leosnd f,... `.. \ ,,.�....-,.,__..-... _--'"-" ., ps laser.• al gsrsw _ — - - AMrox PropMty L/ne .y Existkg poww-vdn ,,,,,,,,, ®,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Tem conraur Ew m, Mbtar LMe/gate w . _! 1] g, Y C bd Pont Pw� - w — -N W— P. owed watt,- Lm /gala who E /ytnq h/9oM Hoyade eroslm canted /' Y l''l'7i'YVl Exist/ g tree /lase prgoosed Ayw—t T._�_ w f-- Matron —ow rYl'YYY'YYYYYYI dearhg /miry Z} gypayed cwb stop EM thg S.— Ltno/rnanhde o Cm Mete monument PUO 5etboot Prop—d S.— LHe/manhde O bm Phe gaposed Powd rooab/pv/khq £Hethg Stprm LN / toh bosh, -. u ask ge taw ®sr�sr-o- P p d stwn, u e/ tm b,s n ate s rmtan .wooro spot aowttan '- ".":.<`, yo-,;.:, ;s . ` prq ooed Powd erdewwk/hate Poth ---,LL—W— Plod undeMrv/n -.- Si¢s —m—tD— Plopated hwt,4g doh EdA-6,g Cmt-, +? LAMt p.t bamkr 437.0, i' r \ Holbap \ Praha 1 T cotdi � / a3z \ 0 �N t n / � / / .r't" --' / 4r- , it -- / ,f""'" ` � ,/ /',.-`,•'--`" ��'"',� a / / �' / / 1 ;� Lh t *✓,f t � r f,�� ? d tr "t "," -. _l- - - - � � - 376;1`_ _ _ -� � -i / // ' l / .✓""..,,....-^'"� \,,,�4..?.•\ \ q',. �` ±� t-' X � r / Y � _-'�--_- _',.ram % z`+ // / � , ontro/ a ence: ' /•'""YY .�. � .,,�'\\ s',tvr ea n� atii'a �; 1 I 1. stdfBroslan''cantrol aid'"sR9w Lance bortYers. ✓ .> gafeotkae.--.. � t, a� \ \` 'y r :F<.. rw" ' 6.L z `�•�,.CuostrLct 3wa/a� etrtl'Td"'n y Lana chock ram ofur sop , f i ,t/rokg. coSW \ \ �.�\� / r c x c$,'a , v it �r.�h,«'3- `^y I •� 1 dome .9LuHkias6urq Rood. 'g$ 8 y bgshs. \,. ^�' o- "! t 3 c� Z." �YI/I ` \ v ,year afi +• I JF°'r- d a/noge and !Iz ca+iMtq Olin necessvy. J/ "' / �' \ \\ i `\,lr , IA I yJ' entrance at Mogall 7Nlnesburg Raad_,.. ,-''"• .� J J /''� }„%" ! r : fis In,ssoFkn.-'--.._-- _,.,�, /J d 2: �b P k'ti �t� w /radnoa+ or'to�wtry j r-"''J / �'` \ \ / ,,"" \ 4"a �'\-.>"��` ` y` ^ -,. •^µme=° I! 1 A'`Coostruct stormwater detehtlon,Gtcgotmant'�osh, / �y t :,,✓ ,.` ,„f -r \ „r-� v..,�/I ! ,n` Cm tract entation bv5ln.hafore yao N +z'Pa atwr r r'/ / '�, ,` // r,.✓,. r,,,,, = 1 y �1-- ice`/''�" eamm0fle" on UnXs �� rc�wgh\19. / N.i'�t,s�'f,, / f /f ,r" "//��''�..✓""��r _ ` f /1 \ \'•..,.-" �•'"✓�� 'm `',-qA'-„•--•--......,� ��- Notes• FOR PERMIT REVIEW / Design A/..� 1. llte /ocatkrr and motario/s of existing utilities is not warranted a. ,m• so, ,zo• ,eo• Grading &Erosion Control Plan—Ston%ngton C%rC/B to be exact or coanplete. the Contractor shot/ Feld locate d/ Drawn n p/sw utilities and be solely responsible for at/ exlsting utilities and their un/nterrupted serv/cex fie Contractor shall contact Dlg MU IZZ5iij Checked Safe before commencing any work, Scale 1" - '�- O Brien Home Farm 2 7his plan /s In no way a boundory survey SAR SCALE 1" - JD' Date Aft, t toot A All water related work to be performed fn accordance with the Specifications and Detof/s for the Installation of Water ""' $ 10°' "'°�°'�'°""°°' °`t'°^"r mo ,�/at Pro et 00I82 ow Form Road South B"14' tm Vermont ran.�a:v zS zmz aw �1 �,e�nea mA % "• !Ines and cpourfenonces fa o// Water Systems Owned by the `"nb"e• 100' °""' `°^° "'"'9'Xie1D� i°ooO ma �' .,�,.r �,,, mP era a, XIt�BS b@ LANSINC Consudtinq ti'ngineers, Inc. A Champlain Water Distrlet, the City of South Burlington, and emw,r e, aom hs a�na toeme a°b mP sNrm - `t the Nlloge of ✓erlcho." * °° ° °^^^ h+ , 16A Alain S'tree4 Colchester, Vermont 05446 nmperan rnectea core '�`. Iry �- - - Appro .. Property Lhe D011hg power pole — w---- — "-w— Exlstft ble, LMe/gate w/w 1? &,wy Control Pow { 9 /ga ............,.. _,_�..__..t —W— — �W— ExLethg Aydront Exlsthg Mee /he ( Proposed hAtwt Nryv-y rYYYY1 GYeorin hinifs zR 9 4f Proposed curb stop s ---s- — — Ewstbg Ssrwe Lh*1manhole o Concrete mmumenl Proposed Sewer Lhe/-a7A" O bon pipe ST- a*tMg Stamm Lhro/catch boar. -r OroMoge Aow Note., Proposed Storm LAu/cotat, bass, 3374 Fhlsh grade spot Newthn The proposed /ntersectlon desfg7 of Hhesburg Road, —cue uD— Proposed undwdrah — so, Hayws Amwe, and Mogakowoy Street has been prepared e by Lomoreux & Dfcklnson Consulting Englnsers, Im This Exfsthq Centaur #< Light post deslgn is conceptual and a find design wV1 be prepared---3,38 Prgpmod Contour 180' I 41 — after rec* of of conceptual approval Aram the Slot* of Haybote sr�bn contra Vwmmt Agency of rro nsportalAw. PrMos*o' Paved roods/P 'log �- SYt lance an -oaten control �_ Prapoasd Paved sldewAYi/birs path A, Arch oso/ogko/ aensR'/w area Mot h [in - - - - - - - - - - PDO �tbO�' JBB.'.N1BBt5 3 c��-e--'--� .9'row boas horde' a' JD' 6o' Im. 1dp' BAR SCALE t• _ w FOR PERMIT REVIEW Notes- t. fie focotAw and malenWs of existhV ullities is not warranted to be exact or complete. fie Canboctor shdf field locate d/ IN" and be solmy respansble for all existlng utiltMs and the/r unh/terrupted sevvkes. fie Contractor shot/ contact Dig Sae before commmaing ony work. 2. A,/s aan Ls h no way o boundary surwy. J. M/ water related wank to be performed rn accordance with the 73pecflkotfons and Detolls for the Installation of Water flies and 4*wtsnonces for oN Water Sywfa»s Owned by the CAan ah7 Water District the City of South Bwtangton, and the Wage or .wlcha " Georgetown I Motcl7 — .,�;,,� �.. ; , - r � ri r 00, ti l ro 01 Ilk r _ /41 A'�ri AAS jl a I'u� \l ✓AVAA\�\1 .'�§ f /Pwmanrrt / /� Ci l I '� a � \ Y / / \ \ •r 60 15-P{ex 16Parking \ AT fiwlmenf Y It .n� .ut �, /J/ ho i�uat UndB(. �\ �tetontlmr !%fYt / 7` /! I // 39 } \ ; i/ \ l - 0 .tch A \\ \\ soar, 15-Plea 16 Parking / = qlT Under 7 J2/ 12 ' III r/ te I / $ / C. t / 1 / \ . r zt nt - ` \ Sk \\_..._..- I_ 1 i ST c III / `•�.�..'..�.yr� � ' � �\ / / 1 I 1' A ` ® �¢+,� �/ _ D ,00 u I I I{ 0 r 15-Plex Ste, wrv, \r ✓� Via, e 16Parking a Is.. 7SN A«cs I I I /},., a ,<. '1,„ ..t. ,ws' Caro i Under it tbrd/ -01 1 J?f�� 3f0 41 R¢ tends to 20 � 1 Nqq / I I C ��A 1 7,. IkJ d3turDmcd / r1I{VII / Nam\/, \ 15-PleX ))III eve,•n? fist /...., ' I t I I 1 � _ \rn\\�� \ ti16 Parking //It P Under - . ��, I , o \ � \ w asvaa - Ras rk ` � �,�-..�/ "•, a„o. eaw,r- /*n!t of Y\.' area. Ato bsurrboo eordr distuu rbanc without pries written OADrOvOl A -am trjg_Q.q�ortment of - f/,1"r'tar7cd Prosvk}vtlon. bw lain.) I ' � I r JJ5— Legert -. — - - A,., x Property Zi- �n, Exhing power pale - —W, - ga-w— &&Mg wbtw Cane/gate W. 112 ,wnyy Contra! Point —IM- — ► w— Proposed Mbtw Uns/gats vww � fwstbng h)ohant Existhg free line � Proposed hydrant �... : FYY,^M^rYY-Yy-N C/sarhg ft/ts YJ Proposed arrb stgo Existhg Sewer Line/manhole o Coxrets monument Proposed Ssww L/ns/mmnhols O iron pipe Existhg Storm Ltn%atch bash -. Oro/logs Aow Proposed Storm Une%atch basin 33Irn nn/sb gmde spot etewUon ---W—w— Proposed und«Nroh -a- Sign Extst/ng Contour YF Ltght post -m8 -- Proposed Contour C � Proposed Powd roods/PwA'ing Ho )"s Mos/an cwtrol ` C Aoposed --T- .SW Tenn ~bn cartrot powd sldswdk/bire path A — Arehosotog/co/ sensitise eras - - - - - - - - - PUD setback -�- - - - �_ Snow !ante boater ,® renp r cmtoor Erosion Control Sequence: I. Instal/ eros/m control and snow rents barriers. J. Instal/ drohogs wed sfo61/hed canstructlaa entrance at D:7aredgs Sfrset-Kennedy d-/�r htersectlm. 4. Construct temoarary sedimentotcn bosh. 5. Install utdlties and storm dvbroge. tNota 7. the locatton and materials of swsthg utNtties Is not walranted to be exact or complete. The Conteactar sha✓/ fre✓d locate as uti'tfles and be solely responsb/e for a'/ exlsthq utfitles and their uninterrupted ssr "x the Contractor sho// contact Dtg Sate before commenting any wont. 2 7hls plan is h no way a boundary surroy. J. Al/ water related work to be performed /n accordance with the "Specit7eaffiwn and Detabs for the h7stallatlon of Water lines and appurtenances for a// Ifbter Systems Owned by the Champloh Water Distr/et, the C/ty of South Bunb>gtan, ond the Nlloge of ✓Wcha " a' .7a' ma' 120' W. BAR_ SCALE February 24 20M hb—bwD 74 20M Aupwt IS 2a01 &,Fa l{ par*hg layout, flnm' plot -bmtttd b-AOVA p—*kg sated trash hare-) rep rep rnp 2/24,02 I7/7e: 6/I3/ Date —Ad afwc#rd able D-.* Ass _. DOEign me Drawn - PrA,13W Groding & Erosion Control Plan —Lancaster Lone 0 Brien /cam e Farm Checked Scale' Date A w b AM Pro t WIN OW tam Road South Bw/h tan Yennant FOR PERMIT REVIEW �WMS & L4-XSINC Conmdtiny fn,nneers, Inc 1B4 Alain Stree4 Cololwter, Vermont 0.f4WS 370 370 te//N)e %nterSBCtiOn of A" road. Devotion = XJ78 New scat Rhn MI75 /nK ,h J57$ kK oul J57.5 360 J60 hnv OW CB Bn M2.5 Rh nu. J57.5 In v. ud J5,AA25 ud 357.75 AW p J50 340 340 Exist/ng edge of 30 Nineffiurg Road Ekrotlon = .7.Ii87 New SNh Rxn JJ,I77 htv. to J21. JJ Inv a t MI 330 330 'stwrg A.G ,_ mon 1 1 --New &a p ng� sleeve and �"- W/VC 320 320 O 80+00 81+00 82+00 83+00 B4 40 B5+00 86+00 87+00 B8+00 ��g �prs s, z�zzaoz drx� y e ttot « t p 1 5 Rood Profile 'B" — Mogalloway Street a.* r W d De oL a°awe Sc°� Horn,: ' Drown MIS Rood & UNit Profile Vert J"=J y Drawn s�r4 Checked Scale '" - .�" ----- O Brien Horn e Farm Date Awl Q 2oat Project 00182 O/d Form Rood South Bmdn tm Vermont ARTBS & LANSINC Consulting Engineers Inc. « FOR PERMIT REVIEW 16 Afain Stree4 Colohester, Vermont 9"-oW Icaoa• �c• � i )) � ! PN STA � PN Et£V - AK 1Q� Rf.W.46 �a47 r: �, h f' New B' gate �«, N®� ... � — II! r.. PN STA � Ji3 i i 7 i 1 yam• 1 ,•• ,.i / K � 1857 � 1 � NOW hJcfont � / / � I �0D• `r cenrer�•re ` of 2 "Erood Erewrlan Mtersecrlan = J47.63 � osssmay afi��'' j .•.�.,•° 1-1 d D / j / ' Nsr I1'x iMusr� I. j 14 zwo •,.F', New !�" �3 � crnrPawrriEv - LOW i1?N/T STA � 7 $rxrr Jl `�:'' •4F+' i PN E[EV = SI2 7 •x K d'Gaa New C8 °+''•r+• / / /aaoa' t'L' f Ren 34.I5 { i aK JJas ( " / 111;111 1}{ � p i j� 1 Centav/tne b�tOrsBct{'u't of "L" rood f cent�itO of rood � / � � � ' / � / 3JU5� Rdn ,..6R.�`��.�•'•� 53fLish/nKI69Newofnv. Ra» 67 road i 323.59 712 iyraN'd .• atti /nv. n f9 � --�--'- -mow '"• i � Inv. ou .Ii6.09 _ y ro/I's—� trx tr ` �xBx°�,rae� NB Rim cB •R2 ", /Q4 e t h /nv. 3 Jit .65 ,,.,• [,a = n�• �* New CB Inv. ud ..�.. „F r New 24' ADS-NJ2 storm ..........�........�,. "" -..................��........,�..�..,..�f "'gip• '�S N7? ......... _.....� ..... / � Mb1r . eer[dcol :eWwvt New JS" O'er_ tr..,�.�. � '� 10" P✓C •� �" �x y�itory �� Nee I2Sr 1 s[) � B' teea and Bxust b/ New � J40 J40 JJO JJO J20 120 wd jq OOt00 D1t00 D2t00 DJ+DO 04+00 D5t00 D6t00 07*00 Storm Droina e Profile Vermont Route 116 Hinesburg Road) Scar Harz rw,ap• _. . Vbrt.1 �3 Design "' - - Storm Drain age Pro file Drawn _-_SIM✓ ._... Checked Scale 1" - .�• O Brien Home Farm Date Fek A� � Project W102 ad Form Rood Sau1h Bur/h tm Ywrmont FOR PERMIT REVIEW ARTRS & LANShVC Consulting Lizgineers, Inc _ '• 7A >64.faan Street Colchester, fermont OB446 N i } FristAg { ground I _ N.. ene I S. � Abw !B �CoecOGdl \\ i �leba'a \ t ion epvq! rwn .xzia tieti � � II New f' �� d/ome(er OMh ----�,--,� NIw Rntp1 � New OMh Rhn 376.2 ?er �i Rdn J30.Z8 ----�!� �,��—__—_ — /nK J219 —..,—�— � lnv. J2S4 � Now End S.ct/an New 1?' 31n ?t' ApS_N!? etcrm E,i.tty oHK, D./. "to /he 9><O pps V S—Nu clam ew 70" PkC SOR J1 itory sewor . R!p Rap_— dlaperso/ oreo Rep/oce exist' y 15" RQ° with new 7f " S—Nl? Rlp Rcp culvert and sscUonl dw° /nv. in 370.Of /nv, out J79. Pw /n t&-~f on with STA - 9f,7.BJ Py aEy - J"74 ed0e o/ B' Road A.a - _500 Dam7lA , >• J47.21 A'= /SAD 7500' W 350 i Pif Y SIZW tQ /II/Nt� Lk - 7.50 nhh ,�vvde a ,Ju tMAls o! cm IMAM tereectkvl � m � � � New RM J 470 o, l?»k�lzk o/ V Rom( dswtkvr JJJ52 h g $ ( hInv In JM7Y neat New hycFont oaa.rnay Avow hychht New SW y Rin M1.B0 � � / 1 Ntw A t •hY. A "SAY New h ov! 0 / New B' Mk out J2S7J b, y 'ftM ,JM.. in J21.26 7.5 fHdi yod� nY. pnlMiN o/ ftw B» �b nv. out J21.16 rood New CHe r / ro 4pe Newt�(( SApI New RM JJQ75 Inv. M•eI Rht� A7✓. 3:J3 J5 1 A 127.1E CH RLn .R3 2 New Lg -W.50 / MY. art M7.0B /nv. J2 9B Rhn .3; 10 BO ew LR / /nY. J17.50 ty� ,y RM JJ7.50 Inv.J27.50 330 # /nK auf J2JC91 w / e- Me2NMI fpg 9,blyd Ai-1r N1I Nemr e.a '"rw �5" tntwf eMak� Aos-err t a / 0 — N,,, J5' aV07 ,»aaA7 �— -- New O /bra _ Mbter under at New Sd/h— RM J=51 .ds ebtr a sacra- Inv. in J2J69� ef:d egoorotkn /nv. out J2J59 wow �tpl . d• Pk' SnR C' M AIM O !Moat 66at — --- — ---- -- 320 _ LOt00 L1t00 L1t00 LJt00 L4t00 15*00 L6t00 L7t00 L8t00 L9t00 110*00 Road & Utility Profile C) Stonington Circ% sir ��;_�p• - O to O CT! C: �O Apr# 9. 2002 Naga Bo y at—e &Ign—1 mob I/9/02 Febro y 24 2002 l%& plat .mbmltld mp 2/2.1 August 14 2001 WM grade; sewe-, st— mp B/J3/Ot OoA newbsd Omo�tkq Checked Dots DO31gn Rood & Utility Profile Drown Checked Scde f• - .�• O Brien Home Farm Dote mlw b tool Project 00182 _ 01d Form Rood Scam Bura' ton Yamont FOR PERMIT REVIEW .Y Bs cl I„IiYSINC Conmd4ng A'n nneere, Inc. INV Alain Stree4 Cokhe*ter, Ver7nont t75/46 c»;'4; J40 .540 centerline in teisection of ,V- road, sto. MO+� £levoriao - ..7 ..92- JJO 330 SAO eenrenne hterseatlao i of B' rood. derot/an J6J.7BMew sm N®w nv kn 5W. 5 4 J20 so 320 ` /nv. u J57.75 AB 8 grode a cw''iv//ne of rood \ A6+00 A5*00 A4t00 A3t00 A2t00 A1+00 AOt00 \ tas__....___._. _. CB \ \ New IN, + '+., �� /nv. J44.15 \ hK ad J44} -- Ivaco, W - i---- N S1A - 8+e5 Rood Profile 'A " — Eldredge Street & Hillsborough Drive .:: New New hydront AA � , Scdes Perrt1 a3�•-_- .x52J� tnv. J4S25 \� ossemb/y J50 ... __.__.___--550 � d7 \a \ AOP� W2 stare \ 340 tMtrar d \ \ � �� ,\ ` \ New CB Rh" JMD ..w \ _ \ \ \ \ FiOn,vy 2Y{ 2002 _ n m cat ,,,anxtm mP a/as/b2 - --. -_--. ---. - \ Dale n•/sed OaaoJptin.i prsc#wd Vbte ' uo Design Me -__ Road & UNIt Profile Drawn Checked _ �e '" - M" O Brren Home Farm Date Ad 1, 2001 _ Pro ct 001B?--- A'd Form Rood South Bur/h tan Vermont AB+00 FOR PERMIT REVIEW Z"PS & ",VFZY6' Consulting Ahn nneen Inc. _ _ •. ry"ie 9 A„too A10+00 A9+O0 >G4 Adin Street" Colohester, Vermont 06, 4 `�� � j P IS9oD• �c $JA a e/�d�aT � I `? ErEv � �IWw, JjydlMr AO, � 7.0o aalwndy K - ?1.4J E � _.,..._Nees ..:.. .... . ......... _...._... _._._...__.._ ...._....__..__�__...._..,...._..........._...,..._.__... __......__..___._.._._....M_,_._. .. .. ,,.. ..,........_ .. .m....._,. _._...._._.._...,._.._ ...,.__._.......__..._...._. __.._..._,----------- ...... _,._.,_.....,._._...__�__, .,_.,...�_..._....__......_,__. _.__„____.v_...._.. _ ....___ .._._.. ......, ,...... .,...___,__._... ..,.__._....._.,._...,__.. ....,.,...___.......,....,.. Pat* New CB Rim 33R9 b t WWW �`n v. ad 37575 m \ \ "`•,« �— -- o171MI,�H o/ New CB s New hldunf CanteNineirttentecth» of load Rim 326;1 oJ•twmd✓Y £/ewticn ��.T23.B5 4 \ ""t.w`'*, Eeh srrrerd h✓. 32A5 � --_ �� ���� hK ad .�72.24 Niw SJIM New !.g � hye. Ex9rthy eagor of � .... ,..,.,�.,..,,.....,.,.,......,. •.., M.s's _ — � R/qr ln' h _ J1337 in JZa O? out 31 .97 RIM J74.4 RAn J2I.15 hv. h J1a99 hK avr Jtaav� Eh�wt/an � J2 O sw,>Q",��.,,�,,.+• fi _ _ oNrrew_aMn_h�t .,,,...... _—'—`a=_ ••__ '.� ::.::: ' ... ..� ,,,,...�,Now B" E+gry t __ __ ..... _ — --.-4......... «.,..,., ................ .,, , l5' ADS-N!? et ,rGtOlti Rhl � 5 hv. h Jla /n✓. out .ir 94 New/o +00 A7t00 ,q,K,p B'tse wlth thrust block -----_ New `B� acn .JRo1lG' � _ 8 8pp 53 8 A 8 53 8 8 p�� p8a y8s y8s J40 J40 CenterJhe hl"r tion Of A' rood Slo. A7+7S Oemlion = J36.92-- 330 3J0 d' tN d!A M"St Nock—' -- CenterJlne htersect/On Of With #WU$t A' rood Va.. A2+65. ElewtJm = J25.d5 New WA Rkn 325:57 AW h✓ h "..02 Inv. —1 319.92--� A m J20 r 20 M0+00 M1+00 M2+00 MJ+00 M4+00 Road Profile 'itrl " Lancaster Lane Scdes• Horz.l �Jp'_-- vert.l �J F.M-y 2.% 2" -Ad d/ —1. &W p1d /wh-I mp 2/25ya2 Date -~ Q�rwbtQ» CYroc*ed Ante Design Road & Uilit Profile Drown S wt Checked _ �•= O Brien Home Farm Dote thr 1, 2IXM/ _. Project 00W old Form Rood SOutn Bur/h tm Vermont FOR PERMIT REVIEW x�Ala n hvBNc a � t , ant 495."S New hydrant New CB axsemay — Nee. rg �� ! RIm 334.30 Inv. 320.91 � � Ran 3ti5?5 cart � lbad Ahw � � Ran .i35, h✓..1JLtJ4 J21. Now �; —' "f h✓.hJ he cvt .93 B5 if New d" J vow CB an 33592 � � �ydnnt y I gote KNro nv. 326.02 New CB how SAM Rlm 3JS BO \ � Ran 33f. Mr h 3 3 d13 tN /nu. 321.5? hr✓. out 4TZS 13 _•EydF�._:� .._...___. NOW d'_i_.W,M.. gate _ New 44 � wJth t \ New CB \ D/oca o Ran 329.25 d" x 6' tN \ y Inv. J20.35 \ s-a�12 New 1r Aos.,t.12 e"QOa1 \� New 15' storm �0.0R5 '� d" lee wlth rnlvst aaak- See Landscape plan for tree spochil See Landscape plan far free spochg -- � r 60' - 0" Right of Way rood I E 35, - 0" - -`L 25 0" 47' >js fit --- 1%J ... '---3•--'- I- 6' wide paved bike path 4 not, (to.) as ordered by Enghew - varies see plan "Wpter main '�•=Js;, Storm 6 min. coves SonHary 24' typ A;ohdt povemert 4' Topsoil 2" boss 1' tap (hplcoQ__ -Canawte curb n 0000 12" Gushed growN 70405A-undromoM e-oh coarse wiM 6'WR J5--..£/ectnrc, telephone wrapped elm T / Cobe ✓, geotert#e AbH, spore Typical Road Cross-Sectlon for Magalloway Street, Eldredge Street, Hillsborough Drive & Bike Path N. T. S Road Construction NotestAh, ,ft t. -d n.,9T ra_-�.hg_a.o.o:M.a) _ 1. New road sho# be constructed to the /he and grade shown on the d aw/ngs. Are road and utility locations shall be as typlco#y detailed unless of srol" shown. 2. A// road and parking constructlon shall be completed In accordance with the Vermont Agency of Transportation Standard Sped#cetlons for Construct/an' 1990, hereafter called Vermont H196woy Specl#cot/ong spedficatlans found on these plans and City/Towm Sped#cotions. /n case of con#/ct, the mare sti/ngent spec/#cation shall apply as detwmIned by the Enghew. A# grove/ and stem seo w structures shall be, approved by City EngJnes, J. The Contractor shall follow Vermont Hloway Spec/locotions (1990) Sectlon 203.11 for plodng and spreadhg embankments 4. F#J mote lal for rood embankment shall be approved by the Engheer. F#1 shall be placed in 12' ON wetted and compacted with satisfactory compaction equornent to 95R of maximum density (Standard Proctor). 5 Road In f#1 sections shill be placed and compacted o mhhwm of J feet above too of any of#!fy to be /nstilled before trench is excamted for pipe placement. In trenches and cut sections, the Contractor shall provide oil necessary shesting, shoring and brodng to molntah compliance with o/ OSHA/bOSHA regu/atlons S. Methods for construction of subgrade she# conform to Vermont Highwoy Specitkotrons (1990) 10,112 or as determined by the Engineer. 7, Any subgrade ar subbase disturbed by Cantrocta; or rendered unsu/tot/e by construction mochkmrg shall be removed and rep/aced with opprowwd granular boc*Sl at the Contractors expense fie subgrade shot/ be compacfed to attain of /east 95X of the maximum dens/ty (Standard Proctor) before placing road or embankment mot~$. 6. The Contractor shall be *soM&&w for coardhatlon of compact/on h the rood and utility trenches 9. Sono fir shall conform to Vermont Highway Sped#catlons (1990) 703.OJ Table 70J.OJA. Granular borrow shall conform to the Vermont Highway Speclficotions 703.04 Crone/w Borrow, Tob/e 703.04A. 10. Grows/ subbase kr powment sho# conform to Vermont Highway Specif=tkns (1990) 704.01 Tob/e 704054, coarse. 11, Levoing course shill conform to Vermont Highway *,velAoatkns (1990) 70405, Table 70405A, #no.. Shou/does show/ conform to Section 70412, Aggregate for Shoulders 12. Bltumhous concrete powwment shall conform to Vermont Highway SpeclAcations (1990) Sectlon 404 ono' 406. Binds, course she// be Type 4 and Nnish weoYng course sho# be Typs .0 or LP. Bose course paving to be placed #rst year, surface course to be placed line second yea. /•T Embankment fill for road and parking shall be a sieve spsci/icatkn as follows' Sieve -X;7 - 4 /IV 2" 95-100 0 Fa-100 j200 12 maximum Tes lnq,-and- Noted _ 1. In addition to the above requirements, all water lines and sewer lines and monhdss shd/ be MoroupVy tested by the Contractor In accordance with the Env#armental Protection Rules 9/10/62, Appenalx A, Sectlon A-02(✓&k� A-04(0&H) and Ch4ptw $ Sectlon 602. 2. No water main shall be doses than ten (10) feet to any sanitary sewer, storm sewer or smitory manhole and Ave (5) feet to any catch bosh. Pro Nab mhlmum of 18" wrtkol separotlm between water morn and stern/sanitary sewer J. A# manholes slndl be vacuum tested h the presence of the Engineer The manholes shall be tested prior to bQ00.. Test procedures and pressure shall be determined Jointly by the local approval agency and Me Engineer Failure of any wcuum test shot/necessitate repolr and/or replacement of the manhole and retest Water test/ng manholes Is not occeptable. 4 Al/ storm force morns sho// be air tested av the presence of the Engineer. At o minlmum, the test pressure shall be 4 pounds per square hch of the highest point along the test for 5 minutes. 5. The Contractor shelf heap o log book of of least twee swing flee to serNce locations and any points of deflection or water morn AHIngs. Books shall be Armed over to the South Badtngton Water Department upon occeptmce of the work. £1eva11ons to Me tap of services $half also be r000rded. $pecifications: 1. The mote bl s,Ab- eiotho shown - mkk- r®qu7 n•„w.ta. h-11go / of e.Whg ea eanr Wl- is r.Nked And dV-7ng on er6thg so# ruodltA-,, the subboss dgoths may Mange If rxommended by an hdq-dent geoteM ka r engh- 2. aeot-tle fabrics .Mal/ meet the requk m-ts of VAOT Sxnm 720 Ar mooted sabgrode wM undo Rah t-,h- J..S d borrow oho# meet the requl-te of VAOT SLbseetkn 70JO.I f. OYovd base andl meet Mre e Wk-ants of VAOT Sub-thn 70,104. 5. thehed grove/ she# meet the requkemwrts of Y or Subeectkn 7al 05 6. CJuehed stone snap meet the requirements of VAOr %A0-u,, 7aX 10. Provide 4' topsoil and seed 1/4' per It. i lI 4e c A ,r { f �� ° D r � j".. o concrete curb (ew.) -...- C42Crate-c urn - Broom Anish concrete - All joints to be tool Anished - Expansion/contraction pints every 20' with 1/2" joint Aller. - Score 1/3 total depth at Cons tru_c tion Notes 1, fie Contractor will be responsible for d/ construction of water main, storm and sanitary sewer systems as shown on the p/Ma He will be responsible for oll necessary adopt" #tting4 eta to make connectlons to Me existing and proposed rt#/ties. fie contractor shall be responsible for all work shown or impbed an the plans and/or referenced in Me specirications and permits fie Contractor ,rho# submit for ooprowcl by Me Englnear a# types of materials and products used. Water Main 1. The prpe for wotw main show be ductile kon class 52 manufactured h accordance with AWWA C151-74 as noted an Me drawings A// pipe sha/i have push on type pints. All NOV3g KVwg eta shall how mechanica',bhts Pipe and Atthgs shot be manufactumd by Clow, OS Pipe ,Rohn-ManWha. or oporowd equal. 2. All pyre shdl be installed /n accordance w/AHWA C-600. fie pipe she// be kept Ere of krwign motto only debrb dining installation Hhen the process of Poe laying has stooped any open ends of pipe she// be plugged. Throe shall be o mhlmum of 5 =0" cover over all plpe and service lines Any pdoe deflection shall not exceed flfty (50) portent of mcommmended morwfocturev's maxknum deflection. Bockall motewos and procedures .ono// be as detailed on the drowings. fie Contractor shall be responsible /or ally and of Shooting and/w shofr+g necessary to comply w/OSHA - V099A rwgu/atIms, J. fie testkrg of the woteemoh shall consht of Me testing of all installed plp4 so mkes, hyd m1g etc the testing shall consist of a pressure test fly/owed by a leakage test All testing shall be dare with potable water and in the presence of the £nginoon fie pressure test consists of mahtahhg a mhlmum lntemo/ /pe pressure of two hunaled (200) pounds per square hch for two (2) hours. Fallen to hold the pressure (f/- 5 lsl for Me spedfled time constitutes (allure of the test for the particulw section of pipe. fie /eakoge test shay be conducted fro ens (1 hour, Me time far the leakage test may be included with the tune of the pressure test. Ouning the /oocogs test the quootity of water necessary eO malntoln the testing pressure of the system shall be measured. fie leakage shall not exceed the allowable wkies as shown In table 6 AWWA C- 600. Failure of any test section w#/ necessitate repok andtar replacement of the failed section. Waking pressure and test pressure shall be detemhed piny by £nghew and loco/ aoprow/ agency. 4 Chlorination of Me system shall be occooWlshed otter the water main has been successfully pressure tested and Morargh/y Rushed Oishlection sho# be h accudonce w/AWWA C-601. Are method of dlshfectlon shall be opprokod' by the Enginew and only oRor samples of water from Me flushed dlshfected min shows no owdence of bocteWoglcd contain/noilo n. Use 50 mg/l far 24 hours fie concentration must renoln above 25 mg% Tablet dshfect/at Is not acceptable. Sanitary & Storm Mains 1. fie peps far sanitary sewer shall be PVC grovify sewer pipe SOR J5 (AS7UV J -T4) with rubber waling rings Storm /he shalt be AOS smooth htwlar pipe. A# pope shall be weld to the line and grade shown on the plans. 2. Are instilled sanitary seww pipe Mid/ be low pressure air tested in the presence of the Engineer. Alter pipe owning, Me, pow section (manhole to fomhds) shall be tested occorting to the following procedure An Internal p' pressure of 4 pounds per squaw hch greater then any book pressure due to a water table shall be created. A minimum of two (2�1=1 . shall be allowed fro temperature stab///ration fie pipe secthm shall be"considered acceptable whet, tested of o pressure of 3 pounds per square Inch greater than any back pressure; the section does not /ass ok of o rote greater than 0.0030 cfm/s f. of Moral p/,oe area. Erosion Control- and Construction Secuence-_ 1. fie purposes of erasion control shall be discussed with and onaroved by the Englnew and Me C/ty of South Surfktgtan prior to any deoM9, grubbing, str(ophg or construction of any kind. 2 All erosion control shall be placed as shown on Me drowhgs or as ordorod by the Enginoer. A# erosion cantrat measures shall be at o mhhwm, Inspected weekly and mahtolned to lul#Il the Intent discussed above fie Cotroctor she# mahtaln the erosion control measures until the Enginew ,is sat/sfled that permanent ground toter has been estab#shed and that further measures ore not requked, .I Hhen erosion control meosures are deemed no longs, necessary, a// moter/ds detolned Indudkng silts and construction deals shall be collected and dfspased of In a manner occeptable to Me Englnew and the C/ty of South Budhgton. 4 if high/y wodlble soils are encountered the Contnoctor may be mquked to proi4* alto motthg, goblon or rNet mattresses, rfp rap or other measures as necessary to prewwnt er0elon. the Contractor shall stockpile hay bales to protect, at a mhlmum, all wok in progress All exposed embankments shall be topso#ed, seeded and mulched as soon as possible after construction. 5. Ate Contractor shall use water and/or calcium chloride far dust control, fie Contractor shalt also sweep all roods as requked to montah dust control 10' intervals If tap coarse pavement is not lid In radius some season as bong the contractor shall sweep and apply env/sX*d asphalt to base coarse powrment prior to laying top cowls. 1"TtezorZP 2' 0e7' -6' LoWhng course bitumhous concrete (70405A, foe) Crushed grows/ subbase 'r--Mks# 500x -Proof ro// al/ material arc led S/ (see road note 44, and ,�13) subUndisturbed Enp node with Engineer present. Typical Private Road & Parking_ Cross Section N. T.S, Specifications.- 1. Are material subbase depths shown aro mhkno m requkemmts fnwstigotmn of ex/sthg so# conditions is requkwd, and depwdhg on ex/sthg so# conditions the subbase depths may change if recommended by an independent geotechalcal enghew 2 Gootext#e fbaks shall meet the requkwments of VAOT Ssctlon 720 for rooabed subgrode and under&ah trenches. J. Sand borrow shall meet the requkements of Moo Subsection 7aml 4. Grow/ bole aW/ meet Men requkements of VAOT Subsect/an 70J.04 5. Crushed grow✓ shalt meet the requl enents of VAOT Subsection 70JO5 6. Gushed store shall meet the requfrenents of VAOT Subsectlon 704, 10 --2 1/2" Bituminous pavement 1" T11ppe /V Wtrorhg Course f 1/2" Type N Base aurae Shoe/der / Shou/der - Tro Lone t Topsoil (to.) `- entshed Slope to \ Ceotext#e frxnrlcJ 14",� gr ref 9ro orinol ground Al (Typ/calf 0Willa P'- 12' Gravel base 8' Wide Bike Path Februwy 2AA 2002 find plot submittal Dote vWeed - tow, Design---_AG.6 _ _ Drawn --Sot -----. n. is roY 1,.. 2001 Construction Notes 1. fie methods and materia's of construction sha'/ omf men to the latest standards of the State of V&mont and arty of South tArnhgta, all war* shall be In confomnonce with d/ pemolts and apprords Issued for the prodbet. In case of con6tct the more stringent spedflcatIm Mai/ epp/y off dkrcted by Eng/ner All work shall be done /n a workmonlLty manner and completed In the tknw speeirrod by Owner. 2 fie Contractor shall be respans6le for all wank and materials shown and requbed to make the ?fob completa These drawings do not show awry flUing or oppurtenorrm Materials shall be as spoofed on the &awirnga Manufacturer's proobct speclflcotlons shall be submitted for d/ moterkle to the Engineer, for opprowl prior to Installotion. 3. fie location and size of existing underground utkities is not warranted to be exact or complete, fie Contractor rno// A&V locate off utff/t/es end Shoff contact brie affected utillty company, the Engineer and the 01ty of South Burlington primer to making any hook ups. fie Contractor shall be solaly responsible for ol/ excathg utkities and Meh, unintarrupted serkices All off -site badrfkl, sheethg and shoring; dewatring, clearing and gnubbing, aros/an control, dust contra; trvffc control, grading, and all hddentals shot/ be hduded as pat of the rwqukwd wok 4. Repair of all disturbed aeaa grading, seeding; mulchhg repair of mode and curbs paving, and other hddentols ore Included as pat of the requher/ work. All disturbed areas shall be loaned and mulched unit permanent ground cover is estobkwhed. 5 The Contractor shall verify of/ temporary bench males before use. 6. The wa*mm and public aria/I be protected by the Contractor from anyand all hazards connected w/tin the construction wok Open trpocha% materials or equlamsat wlU1h? the waking /knits are to be goaded by the use of adequate baWcodes or flagmen. All barricades left In position ovemight ore to be pruprfy kghted. Kerosene pots are not acceptab/a When work narrows the usable pavement, flogmen shell/ be employed to old the flow of traffic so that there whIl be no undue delays. fie Contractor shall be held responsb/e for the safety of all workmen and the general public and all damages to property occurring from or upon the war* occasioned by negligence or otherwise growing out of a fakare on the part of the Contractor to protect persons or property from hatrwas of open trenches matrfals or equipment at array tkne of the day or night w/thin the working anew. All we,* shall be ken conformance to O.WA regulations 776e 19, Pats 1926.851 Door 1925..652, and applicable to VMWA regulations. 7. The Co ,!motor shall wrffy all utkity Intersections and contact £ngheer and Owner w1M conA/cta H fie Contractor shall cog Dig Safe prkxr to any excawtion. 9. The Contractor shall coordinate final location and inverts far water, sewer; and storm bukding connections wlth the Architect Sfr ctural Enghesr, and Mechanical Engineer. 10, All new sanitory and storm pipes shall be laid with a loser to elevation and slope as shown on the plonk Genera/ Grading and Site Work Notes 1. A// area dAhlrbsd and oil awar wRhh the dswdryy limits shall be graded and cov&vd with o mhkrwm of 4' (1412 an) of compacted loom topsok. fie areas to be loaned arid/ be fire and dear of roots waste material and other de/etrfous moterfal. Topsok shall be spread and llght/y compacted to a depth of 4' (f0.2 cm). ropsol/ shall be approved by the Engineer. All side slopes are to be loaned. 2. A// turf establishment shall be h occorAmce with Section 651 of the VT Standard Speehrcothns 1990. Mulching shot/ follow seeding by no more than 24 hours J. All cut slopes shall be no steeper Mon 3h on 1. All M/ slopes shall be no steeper than 2.5h an 1r. 4. The Contractor shall not disturb any ex/sthg ground after October 15th, unless approved by the Engheer. 5. Temporary sit fence shall be erected p7or to any deaMi or construction. fencing may be erected In phases but In no case shall construction of deaing proceed fencing. Spatial areas may be des/gnoted by me Owner for preaervotfon of exist/ng trove. These areas aria, be the Cantmotois responsibk/ty to insure no damage Is done to designated treay. 6. Ex/stIng plonthgs are located In general areas as shown on tints plan. Contractor shot/ protect p/anthgs so as not to damage these or that root systems. 7 S/ooe stabkdty based upon unsaturated sok condition. if during constructim saturated "is aw encountered, contact the Engineer Immedlately. ProHde erpans/on )bint where sidewalk fs agoknst curb. Use MOO ps/ concrete Use 0,711-40a/trig to concrete for sfdewo/ks and curbs curb and sidewalk as spedffed In Publk: Works Spechrcotkxna Expons/on Jbht every 20' Score 1" deep every 5' I Broom flnLsln concrete 14- IF sfdewofk (typkvl) --4' tepsoll seed and mulch. J/4' or R Tipica/ Concrete Sidewalk Detail N. T.S Sidewalk range with texturaa wrrexo e _y C Gras® strip .}t Simla Ramp Cn Comer Radius. Narrow Graaa Stria Between Sidewalk and Curb Narrow rase Strlo Sidewalk Ramp�6 Il4•• re�eai yt•+ ee.m,ea7 �, Curb tromltla? Roadway Sidewalk Ramp (rexwrea) Curb ��— SECTION A —A —C.,b SECTION C—C Arml>ry eideezlkredam Auxtlmay Rounding—�` 5•-8- rake. width era SWe elk NOTE: Contact City of South Burlington to confirm ramp specifications prior to �SECTiON B-B construction. arse. ie�l/ I- • Mecharlcally spread compact bltumhous concrete wfM equipment opprowd by Engher: B" 6' or as chow? on Plans 1 6' ?' Tjpe /// bftumhous 4' topsoil. see site concrete sidewalk ' l- for grading T Mkafl 500x / �B" cnrshsd grow/ Und/sturtSed earth or ¢proved subbase (70415A, one) fll/ mater/o compacted to 95.T.,' standard proctor In 12' Aft&- Bituminous Concrete Sidewalk Detail N.T.S-___._---- 2' radkrs concrete curb (sa bawwJ aonayte cab Jh/sin grade Section A —A •2' thick bit. rWhfwtl4f J' thick bit. cornmencvaf 0iakan base shalt be the f0' Min th oth as the road mo canmeichl section. _R.aW. - - - - — concrete (5' thick) la a?mr7 -W— (5' Mktk) grass hit. concrete both 8"s begh curb bit, cnnodte apron toper gross concrete curb ' �(15' single) (20' orb 1, (36' may. CommetdceN ' ma's of rood Driveway Apron and Curb Cut -- N.rs ProHde curb cuts as directed by Owner Proe4de 4' topsoil 8. seed and MUICA rW va"ts /l/,, — -,, -Con- E/ate-cur,60 . - Broom lh/M concrete - All )ofinte to be tool finished - Expansion Joints ewry 20' - Score J/J total depth at 1 10' Intered9 - Use 5500 psi concrete I - Provide ayponsion pht where ddewd/r is agohst curb. - Use artl-spo///ng on concrete Concrete curb (typ. curb. t v 7' at 14 G b/tumhous concrete 1 vatic , o, a, ° e A � e tsYMhg oaurse it, growl base 9'.__ _ (704.05A, fine) erica/ Concrete Curb Detail N. T.S 4' taperer{ r/2'ladws Ocncrore,br4/l m'aat .rec*,A 501 c/ M..V—t • � Stono'aroi Speci9cbetnw.for park¢ J50C�SY concrete Dp/ca/ Tapered Curb N.T.S Canasta ...oar, I Rods threaded on both ends with nuts. Y b some eon to J7' Use side lugs for 30' _kc Col washed 12' Ibr ,pan. oar.- 37' and 36' only: Gan or steel - Use connector lugs for 12" to 24' only. I 1 Alternate ConnectAms. N2te5.�- 1. Toe plate to be punched to match holes In w A sk1rt /lp. J/6' golwnlzed belts to be fumished. Length of toe plate is W + f0" for 12" to 30' diameter pipe inclusive and W + 22' for J6' to Pion 46' dlometer pipe inclusive. Reinforced edge a ,ge h Toe plate 2. 6' Holes f2 ac. max. epoch Sertatloa_ Gbnnector section, r --Toe plate Owls Seat/On. 2 Skirt section for 12' to 24' diameter pros Indudw to be mode In one piece. J. Skirt sect/on for 30' to 48' dkmteter plow hdusiw may be made from two sheets (dead by riveting or bo/thg on center line with 3/6' golwn/zed rivets or bate, 4. Connector section, comer plate and toe plate to be some gage as skirt and each to be ga/wnhed kmehr 7hJck f Body A Mar. ft /2't W 24' 1 Q064 19 1 !J 1 6 1 4/ 14B 2-f/21 piece End Section Detail nts - rewfwory 25, 2002 &a plot tabs ittW aawmber 14 2001 mo/nbnance notes Dab row-d D-at tin Design MAY De tails Drawn SW :ale `� eta O Brien Home Farm tte •way 1, 2091 ,olect 00182 &d Farm Rood South Burlh ton Vrmon ARTS ark• LkUTV67 Consulting L4agineere Inc. . • " ° �� f64 A iren Stree4 Colo"ieaterr, Vermont 08�46 NOTE: 1. Top may be mode directly to ductile iron pipe. With other pipes use either a coupling contoinlrrg o factory -topped brass bushing or use a double strop service damp. .2 All tops larger than 314' require the use of bronze saddles. 3. All brass unions and adopters shall be Mueller, or McDonald A fie Contractor shall not Install curb box In sidewalir or pavement. S SLbmlt shop drawings to Engineer for all components of the water system. �. /—Access cap � cross country -Te/escopic curb box, LJ buffalo t)pe j Mueller H-10334 or $ approved equal Topping saddle (If required) New corporation stop Mueller F Short section of cgWer H-15O0S or approved equal �o tubing with temporary plug to be installed of the end Horizontd of each curb stop. Remom when /ins la extended to frost loop Curb slop, Mueller Indudual units— i H-15200 or approved equal -Water main _ Wafer service trDR k Conner Undisturbed soil= 'x16' solid concrete block See water trench detail for bedding requirements Water Service Detail Mrs Note A ffinmi block shall be hatd/er/ of d/ water main bands rvducar; ead crops and tees. .-- Alhhwm me Lfideturbed se/ (Ms megofrg i Ad/ /asgM of Pipe ca'rtohwe 6uded gate rcl°w whh concrte eopport d anchor (ass burhd - gete Palm detol dma.'A 6' (152 cm) mh. &� into trader wort' thdreturbed eel Vo/w/beod End Reducer Note• Pare 3 mY (mhknum) (hdhfefbM JaI pd)ethylene sheet between al/ ccrxrets miust bh+c4a and p,Joe/a Afthgv to prorsst bond --- EEr Cmvee aha'/ not*owl I , bdta tc of Atthgs.s ._.-.Undfetu'bad eoI' Tee 90',45 ;22 1/2,' Or 11 1/4'8.W7d % rUst Bock Details N, rS Minimum Area of Becrino Surface of Concrete Thrust Block (in square feet) six tiDNOIAQV SAFE 854RNO LaAD(PS r) OmT nzs aA once Ia' as Tricot Ove.T eras Ym�. eu Y' as Ptf as ems • nus ono fa' os isttx I.+' at t3S eu ems b ran ru°s wauc I.T' eu ore P3f as ens ens wu (a' eu .snorer of ore PVT' as 125 at, as 05 as to as 1.0 05 20251.5 to RO 0 1.5 sofaeho'e 14000 t0 to to es 45 20 1.0 40 20 to ASS as .15 20 Id0 Al0to to LO as 20 as 1.5 151.1.5 Sa 30 1.5 SO 85 SO 2.5 1d00 1110 sera ,;000 45 2.5 1.5 to 25 J5 20 7.5 4,0 20 AO 1.50 7.O .15 0 QO ern P0A 30 45 25 1.5 SO 7.0 Al0 ISO SO 40 140 % / t0 7.O 0I50 SaA day 1,000 seseww weew pn�es m wen per OAgalD kw�'7 J Frame & carer Neenoh R-1642, Lebanon LC 255 or eq ° 6' T Provide cast h place - steps Use polypropylene plastic rungs with 1/2' grade 50 steel rehfa-cement or equal, Asphalt cooted CAess B concrete or - red hardened briar shelf and hart LHdbturbed ,- Fin/sin grads slope to al a/h - - Cost In place cororots riser, Oss class B concrete (J, 500 Pre/) between cost Iron frame and precost concrete manhole -AS7M C478 Precast rehhrced concrete manhole and cover by Camp Precast, LWswald or equal. O' Rmg gasket or Mastic Do not mortar hsb'e faro of manhole. - --Manhole shall be vacuum tested While lowest Jbht is stgf exposed. Lost h place or press-sed gasket for o// pipe pmefrotims now o I/fNsaAbtife baua section 314' to I Ili' crushed compacted stone, Tmiccl Precast Manhole N.T.S Thrust block Fwrlsting 8' water m77 •U: Tapping sleeve and valve by Clow, New B" water service \ Mueller or approved equal. Contact Champlain Water District and Wet top shall be installed by persons the Engineer 46 hours prior to top. approved by Champlain Water District Retail Division and the Engineer. Typicol Tapping Sleeve and Valve N. T.S - D+2' poMsg to match —kthlg the Contractor shill be, reepcn /b^ cwno/ping . w/tA a-WSYlA - WSHA P n regu/at/ms A// water related work to be performed In accordance with the SSppe ffcat/ons and Oeta7e l r the /nstdtotion of Water lhes and wpurtenonass for al/ Water Syysstems Owned by the Chomp/ah Wotan- Distract, the City of South Bur/hgtm, and the Wlage of Ja /cha " ryhay Find b.*Rl material sad/ I cmtah no atmre greater Mx .AZT \ than 3' h d/mnets; no -:..0andad standad i 8' water p4oe horn /amps day or proctor potter Y shall hom no /ass o+'gank moteribz (AA-W T--M) 8 than throe brass Piece h 72' Aft card wedges halalled ttr pact as uldkated. '� at each /bht. b Use m she send la le Doci /MI W hamMhg and halo,' back 141' +. • Ductile Ian, a 52 aMPar Undlahrrbed ho(wr6l -Compact under p,* Ex"Pote trench to ayopart -FYnMob min. 6' card w hkn ores /edge bell, jb kts and pie equdy Typical Water Trench Details M T.S Got& w/Pes .oho// be A.WWA, C 5LIO-80 Standard Gate Palms with mechanical )Mats of sizes as requlmd on the pions All w'res shall be of cast or ductfe Iron body, parallel Dross ssoft non -rising stem, Inside screw, double disk construction with O' Rhg Stem Seals. A// Palms to be equipped with o Palm box ibr a minimum of 6 feet (6) of cover materlal. Ate gate wims shop open counlaclackwise and be designed for o waking pressure of 200 psi Adbstab/e Iron curb style curb box with Use 4 mil, polyethylene between Palm and concrete - -- Undisturbed sal CW e�Oked�"NOhr' Crushed alms thoraugVy compacted TmIcal Gate Value N. T,S NOTES• 1, The location of sewn main h relot/m to water mains shall be In occordonce with the 'Recommended Standards for Sewage Nicks' so-co/led Tan State Stmdads and Water Sapp/y Rules 2. Sewers s1o// be laid of least 10 feet horizontally fran my exlsthg or proposed water mole. The dlstmce shall be measured edge to edge. ff this dlstonce cannot be obtohed, then the p¢es shell be hstal/ed occordhg to ERR Chapter 1, Appmdlx 1A, Ila. ,I !B' separatlm shall be mohtahed whether water /s orsr a under sews,. /f this distance cannot be obtained, then the pipes sAal/ be Installed occorubg to EPR Chapter 1, 116, Water mah 18' min. / Sewer Select boa{'&/ canpaeted In 6" (152 cm) lamm-95X stmdcrd Proctor density. 0,vssingc Sewers crosshy water mains shall be laid beneath the water main with at feast 18 Inches vertical clearance between the outside of the sewer and the outside of the water main, when It is poswWs to maintain the IB' rert/ca/ separoUm: 1) the crossing s°he// be wronged so that one full length of sewer is centered oboes or below the water /he with sewer,khts as for as, poss/b/e from water WntA- 2.) the sever pipe must be constructed to water moh standords far e mhknum distance of 20 hest either aids of the crossing or a total of three pipe /engthq whkhemr is grootr, ,I) the sect/m constructed to water standards must be pressure tested to mohtoln 50 psi for 15 mhates without leakage prior to bacF&ling beyond me foot above the pipe to assure water tightness' A) where a water mokr o assej under a sewn, adequate structural support steal/ be provided for the sewer to prevent dmnoge to the water main, -Sewer.1 Water Separation Detail MT,.£ Ail.+ D 2002 CND enmmenta jY February 24 2002 Ma prof errA.Rtot mil Z15102 I aeevbm. I IOafs Design " Sewer / Water De tails Drawn SNN Checked Scale mts, O Brien Home Farm Date MY 1, 2L01 Project Lid Form Road South Runh ten vermon XR�9S & ZkVS/NC ConsulAng _'ngineerse Inc. a . Z >6'4 dlaen Stree4 CoIeAeeterr, Vermont 05'f46 ProWCe 4' mkr. of topsoil and establish dense gross-, See s/te plan for sump Topsa,, Op. Install Mirafi 50OX filter fobnc (or egad) under and to skies of stone- 2. 0 -2'-0" stone 6D type Z (706.04) Mi un of Stone Lined Swale _ N. LS Storm Ou tfall - nts pe of to, m Existing ground '—✓ermonl State Standards Wall 14px Type // rip rep EmeroencvSpillwoy Detail N.T.s spodng vaNs depaMbg on chore/ d** A v.z CutoffSane t7ew�avn trance ----------------- ---- -Gwt wi de 24 d*go roe —�, CattO y PROFILE Not To Scale A B 9'1/h rq ta CutoN B design bottom 2 2 SECXW A -A ?4"oMax. Not To Scalea° V Csnter -ECAON B-B Not To Sale COVS7Ruc7701V 5-F0,17CAWNS 1. Stone will be placed on a Neer ftdc foundot/on to Me thee. Crodes and locot/ons shown in the plan. 2. Set spodng of chedt done to assume Mot the d*vetlons of the crest Of the downstream dam is of me same devotion of the toe of the upstream dom. Extend the stone o mhlmum of 1.5 feet beyond the ditch banks to prevent cutting around Me dom. 4. Protect the charnel downstream of the lowest check dam loom scour and erosion with stone a• loner as opprgor/ote. 5 Ensure that chore✓ opourtmances such oe culvert entrances below check dens are not subbct to damage or blockage from di'sp/aced stales. Stone Check Dam Detail /v. KS PA DEMENT povament Volw cover marked _ Sewer' or Storm' -; according to use. 1. Cost .loon IV- box t qo d approved equal Fiber packing between - p/pe and vo/ve box. 4" PVC SDR 35 -- CROSS COUNTRY Watertight cap marked 'cfeanout' 45• bell and spigot elbow (4 i PVC SDR J5 bow `-A6 wye for In And deonouts (6' X 4 45 bdI and spigot for termhal to 4-)Sanitary / Storm Cleanout Detail N.T.S. Die Contmcta shd/ be ro4oana/6/e fa c ewAg with O-WA - VO-WA regWal,be, Boom moterld Mel cootah na stones greater that J" h dk—*t r, no fm2en /umPA day a agadc notarial PMce h 11" /lfts aid —;—t of hdkohd 114, to J14" av4hed Non. love a�/tory Sand JAY Mr storm-- Undleturbd mot.rlat- ot2 -- o match exla[h pO"b an'DO1O°• mound d/ghtly stw1 staord Procttor- i procla: PW MR JS sonitay ADS smooM /nterhr stain Tjplca/ Stavm1 Sanitary rrench_ Detaft — Mrs A// cakh b-h,. shd/ be /ad <gdnst the cab whse mohtohhg lid/ o"VU conawte curb, see data., Fran. and pW4 _____... R, avob day. LeOo LF244 a egad ro fern cwe/ non-shrhk pou Use 11" 11=1f, 6' c Catch bash by Can% dLewdd or .qu01—\ - ASYM spec. 04T6-6e - 4,000 P.9 concrete - Steel rehfWC*d to ASTM specs - AA-WTO 11-20 woad Mad PioHde cost h Place _ etePJ wtlM dwth exceed. 6• ban rhf to knw7 out. uJ. cgcdyma edvje mien. OW 60 sf r>w^avm�nt a egad. Mcnd/Mk boss ---- Fkst ,bht shag be nlg/,er Man inrort out e/evetkn. L/ndsbwbd .. o- butyl rqw. 12' a / --_ frer/b/e pipe s/etm att a paused ganket fa d/ Poe J , j Pp.trat/cns O Row 6 wn;o to 1 f/2- =4.d stars Typical Catch Basin N. T.s 2Oa2 1 stone check dal eteo. M.d Male M.8 SW De tails act. Scde n.t.s. O Brien Home Farm Date del' 1, 2601 _ project OOl82Old Form Road South BwAh tan Vernon XRlsBS & I4YSM7 Con"467 q XiWineers, Inc. A 160 1fain Stree4 Colchester, hetmont OSVAV 7 Q Isa4 • baled hay or straw 50, Y'x2'x r stable P/on New Y'x 2'x J' stater overfgg aaysr embankment oleos existing ground NOTE.' To be used h locations where the wlsthg ground slopes h toward Me too of the embankment. Baled H� or Straw Eros%on Checks N-TS -:_- In areas where freeboord Isavadnb/e use 1 m 2 bock slopes - seed and mulch 1 T d Q5T I— e(/4 ' Q75 T Parabolic Grossed Waterway Sectlen N. T.3 Erosion Control Notes 1. Tine /Anit of Oisturbonoe shall be c/ealy defined by Engineer prior to clearing. Eroslon control shall be established to trap sediment on s4's 2 Are site shol/ then be cleared and grubbxl. All mots, stumps and deleterious materials shol/ be removed from the site The Contractor shall mini» /ze the amount of disturbed land of my gins? time. J. Al/ erosion controls shall be installed as detailed h fhe publication llrmant Handbook for Sod £roskn and Sediment Centro/ m Construction SYtes 4. All erosion control sad/ be placed as shown on the drawings or a, ordered by the Engineer. The Contractor shall maintain the erosion control measures until the Engheor /s wilsAed that permanent ground rover /s estoU/shed and that further measures ore not required 5. The erosim controls shall be checked rwgulorfy by the Engineer Any necessary repolm or moolY/cotfons shall be fnmedlote/y completed by the Contractor 6. All excess maten'd and topsa shall be atocipllod I,areas approved by the Engineer. These stockpiles shall be surrounded by hay bale .radar conlrot dams and shall be seeded and mulched to mhhn/ze erosion potential as dkeeted by EhgOeer. 7 As disturbed areas me graded and taosol/ed, they w9l be seeded and mulched to reduce the wos/M potential of the soul 9 Any drainage swo/es with o slope greater than 5t'shall use a stone Bring for stobl/hot/on. See Engineer /br dotal. 9. When erasion control measures are deemed no longer necessary, all materials detained, hcludhg silts and construction runoff debris, s'ro// be collected and dl;oosed of h a manner acceptable to the Engineer. 10 Mo Contractor shall use water and/m calcium chloride for dust control 11. line Contractor shall pro Woo hay bale h/et protectlon around each catch bosh? prior to pavement and turf establishment See Deta/1 Showt. 12, Tine Contractor shall sweep Kennedy DrA% Hinesburg Rood, and new powment as requ/red and directed by the Engineer to molntair dust control. 13 All erosion controls shall be installed prior to October 1 for winter construction. 14. A"Mma/ erosion controls shall be Installed as dieected by the Site Engineer 15. Tine Engln.- will regularly inspect the erosion controls in place to ensure Mair proper hstcllot/an. 16. All disturbed areas not hva/ved In winter construction shall be mulched and seeded before October 1. 17. AI/ water construction a'eos will be stabllhed by mulch for whter/;orhg meltdowns and when whtw canstractkn has hafted. Detention Basin Maintenance Notes P",V /uPLE40VU nCN ,. Stom,wota- detente.r/t eotment ma✓'ty must be mobtoined in good q—M g o,,dn It wY ,i— 'd Mud be cleaned de necesrory to mo/ntoh odea✓ote treotment capacity. At a mhimum the !d/owing pro.Wure.. -ld be imp/emm,ted. 0. tYoemd oeoa shoe be mowed Is needed to prerwrt growth of blush. 0. O_d Wgetot/a, should be .moil/Mod and mohto/ned on a// wear shoWl/1g owe ro' c. Sediment ocarmutdted /n the bosh vase deeper than 6' Md/ be removed Ind d/rpge'd of to on upland veep It /east tab felt gm, waters of the slot.. All d/sl✓rbed oreoa Mal/ be fopxJ'ed seeded a,d mulched d outlet sWct✓ ,, atormp yes, r,O ooe, d'Wee arch gross 11-d swNee Na// be kept /am o1 debris and evoi—t and in wcrkhg orals. Rep./r of denoge Moe be hl* carted ar soon os r/t, cmd/tbns dhow. T p y eiae/on antral hoA,I, bus t /km'ted to /,/, o5eck dome and set font? boners Mo/l be lnp/mnsn ted hm,.wo efy Stormwater System Maintenance Schedule 1. nr. etomrwatr twm A corrprawd of any parrkw, of Me an. that eecb or cm ,.war.-. 2 Catch bean P' .w7ould be km_ted MgWody and cleaned ar 'W"'d J. Ae d,'tcbee and swo/es must be a p tbd red/ y and repo,ed oe rpWrM. 4 e w otew,tkn muse be g✓vea to whew- time i- tend hens. Rub/k ttgltt-of-way—, 4� IV& a*KK PV_d Profre provide appropHate trans/Hon between Sta6AMed Construct/m Enbarce and Public Right of Hoy — mine E ".g ' 20'1, 1 1/2" to 2' of I ground gushed stare Mlty I Plan Stabilized Construction En trance Hoy bole b—for - 2 rows -- Steel stokes driven through ides (or erect of balsa staggerphlo- i1 snofnwl fence on downstrlelam side of bales) Set Ode into barW - to V III_' 'li fl be Installed at 50' to 75' fnterva✓A depending on III li jai I pitch , or os shown on plans -- Note: U U a q`u' • - U Sediment shol/ be cleaned out when v it hog reached half the height of Coorse grow/ Mter (or use the hay bale or before major predicted After fabric - MkaA loox- rahfa9 events Remove hay boles after set into ground and !&ed successful establishment of vogetat/an. over hay boles) T�pl:ccl Temporary Hay Bale Erosion Control Barrier Nrl 7)p" ar "I grwew Anchor bales with states prior to paving -Inlet grate curb Inlet Protectlo_n__ Al. r.9 Note: Sedanent shall be cleaned out Men /t has reached half the height of the Mince or before major predicted rolnfall events. Remove Of fence offer successft/ estoblishmmt of vegetation. MiroA Enwofence or MiraA look Alter fabric staple fabric to fwcw� Form 12' dee{o trench Stake /oy rob In batten \\ cover with grove/ Mp Ballast-, Section A -A Al/ valves shall be AWH'A approved monufoctured by Mud/w, pow or opprowd equal. All valves she/ be open countwdockwlse. Provide rwAectw In accordance with Municipal Standard S edtoway joint 7hrost block (see dotal) e All h)crmt drolns &W be permanently p/ttypao A� - -- Steel stokes driven an downstream side of fence Snow fence or MkoA Enwote nce --Flter f.&-I, an To be installed of 50' to 75' hterva/s depending on pitch; or as shown on p/ors Typical Temporary Silt Fence Erosion control Barrier N.T& All water re/otod work to be performed in accordance with the $oecfAcatlons and Detalls for the Installation of Hater Ihes and appurtenances her all Hater Systems Owned by the Qharrp/oln Hofer Drserlc4 the City of South Burlington, and the VA'loge of ✓4eicho.' 4 =0' min. Adulrstob/e cast Iron valve box wiM rover marked 'water' typko/ d/ valves Me Contractor shall con&m hydrant spectMV(lon with Munklpd/ty before order'hg. Hydrant sod/ be accordance with AWWA C-50Z 3-way post t)pe breakaway, Mae//w Super CentuNm 254 A-423, Kennedy Guardian K-81A, or Woterous Pacer wlth two 2,1,' have nozzles and we 41,2' pumper nozzle Secure burlap bog over hydrant anti placed Into service. Hater main earth, typical - Concrete thrust block eve din ow swear on and/sturbed material. (sow thrust block detail) potted 9rc 1 • oral d sf e a r / a .0 ,? Hydrant tee !Y' elf J/4' alma to oar W AW Use 3 Mlle palyathytene botwom concrete and 1.Cantractw ahal point hydrants Ruing (t)plcol) in occordonce with Municipal/ Standards aAw flow test by Tjtpicol Hydron t Detail H. T.s 2 Contractor shill proKde swing ties for ol/ water line bends and elbows -1 All M✓ glands sad/ be ;uegolug or approved .quo/ rO.-y 24 2002 rind pert OUWOW _ '"? - 2y26yb2 bob vW d D.ecrblk? Checked Date Design M✓9 Details Drawn SMH Checked Scda n.t& O Brien Home Farm Date me, 1, xa, Project C0182 I Old Fwm Rood South Burch onYevmon XRBBS & ZAffSINC Consulh"ng Engineers, Inc. �� >64 A(airs Shvef Colchester, Ye?mont 05446 r-- Removable square cost iron grate Removable squwe cost iron grate Use high strength grout " - Use high strength !n weded 3x 3x 3 h welded 3' x J" x 3/8' angle /B" ong'e non -shrink grout - / you frame on 3" x J" x J/B" men -shrink grout - Iron frame on J" x J" x J/B' angle you legs. Provide 6' clear / angle irar legs. Provide 6` dear des. contracto, shall I vw1a o�rtrow JJZ o submitshop idoowings forgppraw/ 9ing Pond e°evA w 3za0 !// �!t shop drawt fort PP OKW edef 12' PW " JS odes JM0, 4' PW SW 35— des .ICAO' � 6" P✓c SVR 35 with 3' hole drNMd /n end cttp and Nosh roelr 32.10 10_ Area far 1.5' leew/7Mt conae o Use high strength non -shrink grout sr t n s 6` PkC SLYP S1 -� `.a 4" PVC SCR t5 with wes J21,7J' I" hot* oHded In end cop and trash rock Welded fN/ over pipe !8" ADS-N12 J24.25' `> � �P/ex/b/e pipe sleeves, °a cost In place or pressed °a IB' efwilp `a gasket tar 0// pipe ° a Pene"a Ions. 4 'r oP ° a 4 mh 1?" ofs a campoeted4, a 9-W New Detention Basin I Outlet Detail N. r. s Removable square cost Aron grate h? welded J' x J' x J/8" angle you yame ar 3` x J" x 3/8" angle iron legs Provide 6" cleor open/ny all sides. Contractor shod Pma oswNow Mat, subm/l shop drowings for opproval. L • Welded fdl aver pipe 15" ADS-N12 roles J7R.b' Bottom basin J19.0 v JtsSoa' 1.5' °a 19" Stew flexible pipe 81"MA Area kP cost !n place or pressed eea4h7Mt cow °a gasket for all pipe e penetr,66ns. J a6a manoNMto > "• oaraeh bare • ` °• • ;• ,�� • `• °° • a mkt. 12' ofa . .a 4 coovacted 4 growl o ° New Detention Bosin 3 Outlet Detail -- N. T.S. aht 05 ` PVC SDR 35 Q Nss_J2A25' °a 4" PVC SDR 35 with 1, hole drilled In snd and trttsh rock �, •a 15'ADS-N12 324.0 . oo' a Ana Mr 1.3' a is" ^MR a RexNe pipe .rleeveA eet oodict a cost /n p/ace or pressed gasket for all pgae <d `. penetrations monalMk no . < °Q: • °e: • "o: , „' a concrete bare - - 4 mM. 12' of r l ow"Pacted I grovat o 4 - f New Detention Bosin 2 Outlet Detail N. Ts. Non carroalw post anchored Into the ground AdrfoNing ends and/ be mechanlco//y attached or wa✓aed to eom other. Submit shoo &vwings tiro approval. aotsar� e/0aM1,+L Non corros" mesh secured L__._._—.J to Me post bona 2" x 2" New Outlet Structure meet spacing. Submit shop drowings for approval. Trash Rack Detail Not to Sbe* - - - — bfe r.«rd naaPf�, ogre °W" Xe Stormwater Basih Details rown sow ---- hecked CO1e n.t.& O Brien Home Farm ate Fid 24 SGtw roject MA2 ad Form Rood South Bur/!n fan Vermont ARFRS & 14NS1YC Consulting Engineers, /no. / >64 Alain Streeg Colchester, Vermont 0".06 I J 0 o w Q, 16 Parkiniv .�:Under I. 15-Plex 16 Parking Under Arch—loq—1 sen9itive area No subsurface earth disturbance ithout pricy written oppr—& for the Oeporrmenr of Nisf—W preset rof— — .11:1111IB) 1 LANCASTER PLACE PLANTING SCL®LAE od. Sdenlik Nama Cam-N—. sin c mmerr COh 40 AB ASIESbnsamea Basem Hr 5'-S M. BBB 5 BPC BETULApep". Piper Bach 6-10'M. BBB 3-5 Stun Clump 6 ON BETULAnlgratledage' Havillap Rile Birth 6-Wht. BBB 3SUM Min. 6 CCI CRATAEGUS can 9.19 1.-Ile Thornless CackapurHavahom T-r ht. Bab multi -stem 20 GiH GLEDITSIAI.1.'HokM Hake Hm oeusl 2-2.5'ral. BBB 16 LO LARIAdoddue Far n Lamh 6-6'rd. BBB 4 BP BMLUS Fbrlbwda _ _ FI—Wng Crabapple 138Ya1. BBB 1G G R 2-25al.9 Sao 211 TC TSUGA—diimis Igredlan LNmlock 3' mra. Cod.1 Comm"Name sto c 5 AA JARONLA arbutifdia 'BMlamissma' Red Chok 49 hL BBB 14 CS CORNUSsmcea Tsnti' iamh Dogwood tors. B CSO CORNUS sedcea 5t1-8 Gold Sit- 8 Gaid Variegidul 14'M. cool. 1B CAP WICINEASTERapiculats crarbany Catoraustar 10-24tiMdh corn. 34 O.C. 4 co COTONEASTER damcata Spreacling Calorimeter 5 pL corn. 3-CO.C. 23 FS FORSYTHIA N.H.Gold New Hampshire Gold Foraythle 4-6•Id. 1368 13 JCS _ IUNFERUS dI. 'Sa nti Green Sargent Juniper ill-w M. B&B 3r O.C. 11 JS JUNPERUS sabina'Broackin W Broadrrloor Jumper 18-21'him cord. 34O.C. 6 MD MCROBIOTA dcussata Russian Cypress 18-21' M. I cod. RCA RHOD. Cata%bierrse Album' Mite Catavba Rhododenden 1B-24' ht. 2ht. BBB corn. 20 RT RHUS typhina Ste am Sunx 12 RR ROSA rugosa 18-24' ht. cord. 4' O.C. 30 SB SPIRAEA I—addaAnthwy Waterer AnthonyWaterer Spim 5 gal. coma 12 SGF SPBAEA branalda Y3oktiond Goldlame Spires 5 Ow. cord. 24 SIC STEPHANANDRA ncisa 'Cols ' CLeeaf St ranch 2gal. cord. 70.C. 26 8A SYMPHORCARPOS oboe Co mman S 2d'M. cord. 31 IND TAXIS media Uensib ms' jDmeSpraadngY0w 1&21' M. BBB 7 VC VIBURNUM radesli Koreanspice orMay6omer Vlburrelm 2-2.S M. corn. ] KS VIBURNUM cassnmdes Widmod Vbanm 3-Vid. 8a8 2 VIBURNUM P 1 34M. BBB Cod. Sdmdk Nama Common Neme Sls e 50 !!H HEMEROCALLIS H Ratums' to Rehans 1 c corn. 30 HH HEMEROCALLIS 19.1 rem. 12 W MCROBIOTA decusswa Russian s 18-24' ht. corn. ' 6 PT PACHYSANDRA termklata _ Pa coda - - 1 rat or50 corn. ' 12 SIC STEPRANANDRA incise Crisp' CuBeaf St _ _.. _ 2g�. coot. 15-Plex 16 Pk%ing Under LANC65TER LANE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE 1- 4 �I T. J. Boyle and Associates ems r«aoa aaa O'Brien Brothers Agency.. Inc. landscape architects . planning consultants mto 2-28-02 O'Brien FaTnl P.O. BOX 2184 _ — - a-2, ao: L 1 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 301 college street a budington awlnont a05401 802 ON 3155 hapAWwwlpeym.com ` _ cos 1• a 30' 1,.&IICA9tET Place LHIIC19C8�3C 8DL� l lg}lilag P)IHIL L I� hip j `-`��'� 'X, / 1 32 ��G 6 f 333 © ® 327 \ 5 32 328 3 33353,33 31 O \ --332 1 333 S 3 a -- r 334 'y33' — m 5 ACES 332 ' r 333.5 334.0 o O .1 33n.0 O 334.0' n 312 334.0 4 31216 \ 333-- Ir lfl 1 3]3 \\ S(E LANDSCAPE SHEE L4 r 1 =NOW 3 . R7I✓rIV �. I Y � � . �_ II11 , I � f \•�, __ -_ � � O .... 345 < 34�3 r``JJ `le' K o v s 344. < o 45 18 - .� W1RK 3.4 �• I MUFM Rm I"i�d�m+: \,\ �a•d_feem•� ,eR� �� La 1 Boyle and Associates saws aue ae. O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. landscape architede .planning consuMb m b ��28-02 DBrien FA1T11T /1 P.O. Box 2184 301 college street . budington .Ywmont .05401 6bz 656 3655 Mpriwwlprya.eem . - -- LL/I South Burlington, Vermorlt05A03 �JIV,, 1' = 3p Magalloway Street Landscape and Lighting Plan STREET AND C041111 VPLANTINGS OF (Ky. Cede Scentific Name Common Name Sa $pec Comment. 23 AB ABESbalsem ea Set— ,, 5'-6'M. B&B 12 AR ACER wbmm'October Glory October Glory Red Maple 2-25'.L B&B 5 &i BETULAni re Heritage' Rlwl Bich "IN. BBB 3Stem Min. 5 BPC BETULApapylfera Paper Birch 8-10'ht BBB FS Sbm Clump 12 FPP FRAXNUS pennsywmca Patmore' Pateore Ash 2-25'cel. BBB 15 PS PNUS strobus VMrb Pine 5'8'M. BBB 41 OR OUERCUS cobra Red Oak 2 2 5' cal BBB 23 TCG ILIA.Met. 13—nspire 2r!.mpire Laeleel Linden 225'cal BBB 18 TC TSUGArenedensis Canadian Hemlock 3' cant. a - Oly Code new r�r• ScientificNa— Comm on Name Size Spec 58 ANA ASTER1laaa alw" Naw &SWW AMW - BR STC Spaced 37C. 5 AA ARON14 atbWRfa Sillw sauna' Red Glgk .-5'M. B&B 7 CS cORNUS nark" %al kartl 2d'ht Cont. 27 CR CORNUSrecemose Grey Dogwood M. wnt 12 EIA EUPATORIUM nnaculrun Ala py. Waed Ito - BR SfC Spaced 3. 0 C 24 IV IRIS wlalcolor 61-11 Yfn - BR STC Spaced TO C. 8 JPC JUNPERUSch Pfitnrn Compade' Compaq Pttzer Juniper 2-2 5'hL BBB 5 LD LARMdeadua en Lmth 50'ht. Colleded 28 I RT Po#15 kr St Surruc 7ht. ceM 5 SB ISPIRAEA WrWda'Art Wataref _ Aratlan Webnr 'nw 6 gai. cont 20 SG SOLVAG0 " Giad G°Ideraod - BR STC• Spaced 3' 0 C. 10 ur VIBUFM M etloburll An an an Crw6wTy Viihuuan 1 31' ht. cons 20 WR INEUplariddMilikiditaildRestonlitiongronkn daaead 1 1 It, Sal SIC' 51os Jaae 8 CSG CORNUS nark" Silty 8. Cseld Slhar 3 Odd Valiagil 3J' hl wm f� \ I am M-M III II ' OIVA ► Ate•. •` �\� \01 � MAR law - �/��/,�i'ii►� �' ham= = ; Ji f �� ;, , � �' �► � �1 7 is �sA A/ek C//jae�Fig9 /BABA/efi \ �• — C % i O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont05403 landscape architects a planning oonsllats L Rljb h 2-28-02 I alnb, a— O'BrienO'BYFelilTt 11eLT 301 calege greet a budhlgton everado t eOstot 8M BBB 3M hUP/MBByr.ipoyb— 1- = 317 I Eldredge Street Landscape and Lighting Plan L3 A Il 11 ae�� �1� I/ID �►�. 1 Y IVA �►/�' jai 10 &7 { 127, ♦♦ \\ Detenfiai/r�eolmsnl � ♦ \ Bosh I ♦ ♦♦ \\ Wellesley Orom Buffer Plont/ng 1 `� ♦♦4— J Londscwino Notes: 1• Each building Is olloted a /andscaptng budget of $500.00.. INS /ondseoping wNl mclude: sea green ,junipers anthony waterer spires, burning bush ha, ydrange mlgho pine, splra van houfe, varleg and dogwood 2 For landscgoing Wong Magalloway Street and HIllsborough Olive see Master Londscop,ng Plan by rd.. Boyle @ Assocbtes. Oeoring limits 9II7"7P7^•T.11.!':T7LiF 1".T7c...,..^.T�CLclI.7,�[a] rf....{e,iE.7 !m RIM[ lA/.RSa^'Rl.'/ri:'/,;�F ':fj��(� `/[:^RT•/^,7.T+1�'�F�7Y.7�[;y�.�—f!.. A..�[Y.s:cfAl� PLANIm sQ'"V"-Swbotam Key /5).Eabd AMr. PLANT NAw SYZE unit cost $ fold $ ® 1 60 Auslr/07 Pba (Phas Myro) 8-10, 150 S" 42 ,3 Ilh/b Spruce (Aivee N--) 6-10' 200 26010 ,I 14 With 6-10' 150 21W 32 floweT*.9 Crabopp/e (Mok/s) 3" 17S 5600 3 22 Cdarodo Q&ue Spruces (Pkea pungens OWco) 10-12' 300 661r0 6 20 Ph Ob/rs (Llvwcrrs Pa/astrAa) 2 1/2- "0 4400 7 12 Dark LYewn Ame k m Arbcrw'toe 10-12' 150 labs V e 3B Sao &~ A"*" 3 gat 35 1" 0 230' Wit raw Asnce J' le low 10 14 See lartdscgOAg note 16-24' I " 7&V i �Qk � r r 1 0t \\ dew- tie f '� , ' s>' � r FOR PERMIT REVIEW Design M.8 a' m, W. 120' ---- 1RO• ----I Drawn %rAPISVW - - - - - Checked Scale 1' - 30' BAR SCALE ,• _ 30' Date way,, 20M Y A rNY Oritmvnr project D01Q2 �nr my PS amr mP ��/� Landscaping Plon — Stonington Circle O Brien Home Farm XR�BS "IUMG Con ns ArW giwerv, Inc. rro _4 A_, °q xm an.r.n ura. ..... .. °°""mO '� 164 Afazn Street Colchester, f'er»wlbt 05146 .Lre A X.tll wskn nnEv/ wwm✓ OwM m r I .......... -. j49,B47.60 grand told! I r lnnljll,; -j Itjfi: It-.:: I I .w I Al-I•jIn"r zrcurlcanalz comtraix ­ 1k ­ ­ A , " --I-.) n.. • V.. - , - e "'t�if 4: '011— AV P; gsmrn v0-- ve4t1osm N W,w. W I". VC, -4Meert A: f-11 I T.I. HMMI .,k aY ;_47 L.Ping V-170 I C, 4 ORDERING INFORMATION: FIXTURE: HADCO Old World V2701 latern style fixutre, with cut-off optics in type III �H PDX distribution, and 70watt metal halide lamp. ORDER #: V270I-G-T3-I3-D-70H-E* *VOLTAGE TO BE VERIFIED BY ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. POLE: 12' Decorative pole to be- used, overall mounting height 13.5'. QUANTITY: 5 Isere is no sv0slitute lot... (mr/r/ y Y 5111"') ❑ Design 129 H.e,h?ej`ormtrce,),ervcaI Lamp, Arm Mounted, PA>und Lulininaire for Mccliurn to High Mouritiri-, Heirlihi - 4011) -o 1,i10) VII V,W in irdusuv's best AVAMIKC ki4.1111110 Witli UIC 10WC5t ORDERING INFORMATION: FIXTURE: Quality Lighting, Design 129 with a forward throw distribution, 150watt Metal Halide lamp, and cut-off optics. ORDER #: 129-20-F-MI4-150-120*-FG-HSS/FL #VOLTAGE TO BE VERIFIED BY ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. POLE: 20' Ht. Round, Straight, Steel pole. ORDER #; RSS-20-5.0-II-GRYP-DNIO QUANTITY: 26 pr— W — d..d..d 4 ­e1rq Top of I—itball W be e—Pe height m P-14UPPAY awn. ­ Do � Nppdpi-a .2*1" pkP,* elan 2' earth ­ An-.M b.&flti - q--WW, break W 'I.& " — d.b-I. ad .Lair. Restore b-1,Pp f­ tap IA I radbali. 4­ 1*­ bwW eepooed di—e "L If caltahr W—, — pa, —piaely 1­ ­t — W p­Pt itirdikV. U,Pd1.4rb.d - calp¢td cal cooed C:) DECIDUOUS SWRILIS PLANTING NA to scalle p� 2- nne cNppd b-Ik —kh, ro more. 1/3 orrprt see PanrPe f- depth of eat UP&etrbd ar ­Vad Boll. —1, T 11 r-)TYPICAL CROUNDCOVER PLANTING NA to 500" C77) CONIFEROUS PLANTING j Not W 50M Prate dw—ged w brok� brachee. Welail i,eePe and Ad— &­b. llee wide belt -type 1,eeP tlee Do rot we rape or u I, h— .1eeheh. Attach at 2/5 height of b,ee. 3 - 2- , 2- hwdmW ethee I^ height, .F tee w —In. or 6'. A11— it a depth or 16-24- below Web. Pont trVoe I- b— nPen ad.. 2'- 3- flk. ah4ped lbvk —kh, rot mart. M rot pkm mulch directly g*wt trek. 3. -th _. An bodfill m np.dred, breaI up clad. &W Pre­e darl, " .tare. 5-HIP, -&Wed. to 4. Lk1dI.tL.1.d - r.rV.,td Wi ­M. CA 4 — a[ aF ito uthe b-kt, soot tM wNh le L,.Ir the —t bal. Lro — bwWp a;,,Peecl d-e " .all e,rfo Re­e bwICP IF— the top 1d1 If burlap W P—P&P, OF rMrral ber. If lb.laV le pLadk - treated, -t and color at but hat tu*dch Is wdw the root;:Tl P— d.,.gd - 1ro bro hae. hots tier ad td— A—*. Uhe .1di bat-tp. I,ee tlee, da rPa, rope - v h /10.. _. RamIdAe peFwatd ptadle tree wrW 3 2- � 2- hwd.,-d Aare.1/5 held!F 1`_ min. OF 7r Alli— (w a depth of 16-24. betas gr'de. Plat — I- d— ni1a 2`5' MW tapped b.* m h, —t —. V. rot War moth di­Uy a At tr­k V wth - A-" b.*1111 - pflPd, brd, p GWdh S—qfy .A,Wd. W 4'. 2' earn — f 4 — at eF the u bmkt that .4*:h W oar ­t that. Lro — ImPrIap, -pheed dose the .all rf—. Iree brW f­ " top 1/3 of :root bat ir b-w le rrode OF . If burki, I. PI w treaded, -t "fa[ but III whkh 1, wWw the Iroat ball. DECIDUOUS TREES < 3' CALIPER Not to Scaille ,MULTI -STEM PLANTING Not to Scde lem— W — d..d.-d 4 --kV br—hie. Line wide bit type tlee % � rrj- t—. All major sere.thmid beti-I t,"Uw. Do riot ur rape - win h h— eleevr. Tep M' root deal W be V &­ Firal wd.. 2'- 5- rkr &Pippd b.* moth, rot ­ D. rot plan * moth directly gt Po-e. a- -th — 2- x 2- x IW hwdwd •tda. 5 per tee drk— hAo W­d, Amer.d bwAflii - podFied, We* W dd. and — d" " ­ 5­11F, UndWtwt.d - —P­td edi —.,d Cut 4 — dl OF the "Zrkt, a. =pt thhkh le -dw root— b-1,W .Ypoeeod d—o the eal -face, If b,Hw 1. cod. a, rears (der. If hLw 1. pineAk - emoted,� and .11 bA th,Pt wNh M -dor the ­t I If rodaklr re­e pot C—Plete,y. 1­P root core W Pe Pt 9"IN. 11*11 O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. landscape architects . planning consultants b 1p 2-28-02 O'Brien Farm P.O. Box 2164 1 _w South Burlington, Vermont 05403 301 college street . burlington - writont . D5401 802 -6W eM5 htIp4t­qbW.­. I—P. Vz: 30' Landscape and Li&fmg DeWls LS _* Id Mj 0 GREEN M La 1);" 1,/,,/ ilk; P 1( c III I, -W— h, MI Beam Conbvi Options Own Doom w—P., C.k.logh—bw 98-CFLqX-P 01,t 0l[.WfAL0LLi,V MUM nXI-F SD,CVLIY~ CF SIGN LIGHTING - COMPACT FLOODLIGHT KIM LIGHTING: CFLI/50MH/E3L-P/BD-CF/BL-P/SN15/BL-P B0,, + 11 It I ---- — — — — — — — 3) 4 P5(5) —335. Existing cctch bc In In + + Rim 334.57 ----It------ - - - - - - - ENTRY SIGN PLAN DETAIL SCALE I' - 10' No Text J50 i 1 I f 350 i , ; ' i t lntersectim wifh� edge Rood E7OWM n = 34 ,61 ( i {( l v flevotion f 334.22 t1ew o hydrant bly E New arseb/y bydrait New hydros ff assembly j{ i I i , I-Wsh ,grade centenine of road New CB Rim 341.8 In u. 336.8 New CB New (( Rim /ni: Wh 332.8 in 32276 i i p t New h - Rim 332.50 R F`mish cdntedine t,_.._._.____,._._,...._.__.....:._.. i 6 9•' of i i I New SNh jRim 3.i4.0 /nv, In 32566 's ,�,._.._......___.....�.._ New h . _ ant _._._..._._._._.._. _ i /nt: 327.40 a I New (B Naw I Rkn 332.0 I Inv. out 324.1 ! f i 1 New 8" _._.,._..__..._�-'-___...._._,......_......... .»..__..,... _.._�........ _._. e Rkn 3327 /n✓. 32787 New CB s Rlm 33L9 /n u. 311? 13 \\\ X gate ✓aNe New SNh lnu. 3263 t i , Rim MI.2 ' /nr /n 327.18 t New' �gote` 8" i 3 ` Inv. out 327.OQ I ✓a/w New CB I Rim 332.5 f sI 4 ' N w wot d- en bend ,Yh thrust Eystfn919r°�ndNew CB t?" N/ slam s-O.CaS ew r2' -Nt2 0" e-a � E#srh ndIn. E X � Rkn J-T4 J26 75 69 � D� 5/ lineNew Nh 42 LJ Ne B lnu, h7i 322.A5 . n�.._....._.. ...�_ outJ'1�i.96 _____..._..._.__. NeW WOterww .___. ee o, .�.s agar •� ....__....._...._._..._...-.._. �- p PYG•SOR. �5 sanrtary sewer ..___._._._ .r.�.,.._._.....,..... _.__._ .�__....__..__........-�. _ _�_._.... ton' sewer s=Q008 Ne 8' P✓C SDR 35 son I� s-aaas� p ,rw 8^ Pic s»x .:s nvy -120 n rh LO+00 11+00 12+00 L3+00 L4+00 L5+00 L8+00 L7+00 LBi•00 L9+00 J# New Silk Rkn 3328 In✓. in 322.76 Inv. out 322.66 - New CB Rim 332.7 In Y. 327.67-� Ju Neal /2' Aa e�N12 — e-0..005 — E New CB j f-mish grade Rkn 341.4 centeNine of In✓. 334. rood Mew hjzpmt 1 assembly � i New -W/) Rim 340.7 Inv. out 336.03 _.._.._...__ € ....._.... s �.._.._•.�, New CB 0 Rim 332.6 i X Inv. J2807 ! ''� gtart( Erlst7n 9r°und �. 2 e A� •�� --'- e f P0+00 P1tO0 P2+00 [or Road & Utility Profile Private Road Vert.1 �3Herz. Y=3Q' NO aZ Road & Utility Profile Stonington Circle Scales• Harz.1 �,30' Yert.l �3 Imo IQ7_q im 346 Cartedine intersection of W, road Sta m0*00 Elevation - 336.92-----^ "T o , : t t ' + I Pit OW j New hydrant erA = 8+86W ELEV s JZH. B7 ° AS ` 7OD €1 ! 777 1 j 1 i f ossemb/y ! K - i EE 9 ate valve I \'••...,,"""� :,....•. + ._._.—.._._...._._.. ____._....._..._...._.___ ob r •" �•.....,...,......., :. m New CB ew hy[ktixrt 'lf" 2 ecll o f •............., F t New CB center a of toed Ri 26.1 m 3 assembly =i E road, Slo. E/evotlon M5+8,� 585 •••••" •.,,...,...,...... "�,,............. {,{ Rim 328.8 1 /n 324.7 �.;. _ > [ �2 i d .., 1 v. In Y. ud 324.9 n v. u d .74 t � RNew /m 32b .75 ` Nim E ' tbtq edge of Kennedy Orrro ...,, , ...... �•••�" 8" tee with �sw 15" ADS-N>2 s se0.0p5 """• "'••• .....,..,....... t ...,. 1/nv, Inu, o 310.1 out 3200 3240 f Inv. 32L0 3. thrust Dock _.._._,_... \ ........., .......................,"w..M,. i t ,,...,..................................... .,.....,.,.. .,........................ ...... New B" Enstin t ew 8""i gate valet} \ 1 ..............�.,.,.,.,.,,...,.,. ". .........n•,IPIZ•P SS ............... ..... °. .......... gote valve ""•""' ...... •••••", Now 1 • •• •"" ADS-N72 star � m ��� _ s40. 005 New 'Wh gt In Inv. 31 02 Lao A7+00N- ".� 8" tee with ~' 18 thrust block /• water /me ` �"' 350 UFA New CB Rim 339.0 Inv. In 332.75 Inv. In 325.7E Inv, out J25.78 Inv. ud 3330 A5t00 A4f00 A3l-00 A2+00 Rood Profile "A" - Hayes Avenue Scoffer. Naz7"=30' Vert. 1 =3' A11+00 A10+00 A9t00 A8t00 FOR PERMIT REV1EW Al+00 3401 330 eA I sEN CmteHhe Mtem*ction Of A' mod, Sta. A7*75. New B' got* vo/ve IV 7i0 �i0 8' tee with New SI/h thrust Dock Rhn J25.75 M✓. M .520.1 /n✓. out 3200 Centerline htersection of ii'road, Sta. A2:B5 £/ewtlon J2585 New CB Rhn J25..1 /nu. 321.9 320 320 A/OfOb W*00 M2t00 Afi+00 M4*00 M5*00 Road Profile W " Lancaster Lane Scolex Horz f •'=3�' Vert.1 �3 S Yam' �O � /0, Dote rcv/ d De ,WIon e».cred cote Design " Road & Utility Profile r. Drawn SH Slit/ Checked Scale 1- _ .�' O Brien Home Farm Dote NY 1, 2001 Project 00W Old Farm Rood South Burn ton Vermont FOR PERMIT REVIEW XRE9S & LkVSI" Consulting Z'ngineers, Ina :cam "° 1 >64 Alain Street, Colchester, Vermont 05'"6 New Aydronf � � � � j� pssemb/y j Finish grade centa/he 9 s RMi w New hydrant tti i j /nv.� 3?99 M 321.71 �osse�nb/y i New CB /n✓.' Out 321.61 Rim 331.1 Fnish � centedi� ode of E i /n e 326.9 S Nee �_New Al" f.25 rood �. B' EmrM nY.,r \N*w \ \ \ h✓. k�322.52 Now CB Rim assembly yote S? \ ~of Mv. Out 31242 � 323�5vo/Ns New CB Rin 337.2 j 8' x 6' tees 324.1 Ne CB with throsf blocks R/m In /nu. J26.7 322.5 \ \ Niw 1�• A�m2 \ \ i ,vw la• Aas-Nts +Ktau Ms-.vta -� � nve s• skv .0 +miner y � 1 ` = �o.�r6 New B' P✓C SOR! 35 ronitory sewer 0.0071 .___..__.......�._._,.... B X B' tee B X 5 t*QS �'� �.• �� with throe# block blocks B' tee with [!rust block 3 0 QE Trees n._ spaced of � ( l �1 t6• I`�Stofm -- v Speoffcations.' O v Sonitor t. me mot " sub - ogoths shown ore mhB - ls?uk- its. y /meat/gothn of ee thg -1 -.WA- /s req.?rod. And dgoendng water main on okWhg -1 cmdlAMs, the . Ibb- dgolha may change if earn -.Wd by on mdepmobnt gent-bWn d en9m- 2 Omoteawe Pobncs shah meet the rmquber e, of VAOT Sects, 720 fa- and -denoair trenches S Sond barrow Malt meet Me requiemente of ✓AOT Subsection 70.10.3 4. Q,. 6 bole sh W meat the rsga/rewsnts of YAOr SLb-t/ 70.304. 5 Ciu had poW M.Y meet the rapabemmta of gAOT Sub -A., 70SO.A 6. Gushed stone ahoy meet the requis wt, of ✓AOr Subsectim 70J. 10. -bp/ca/ Rood Cress-Sectlon for Hams Amnue A 81ke Path N. TS. Rood Construction Notes ( Al/ refemoces to road shall apply to porkhg areas os -0//. ) 1. New rood shot/ be constructed to the line and grade shown on the drawings. The road and uUfity locations shall be as typically detailed unless otherwr'se shown. 2. Al/ rood and parking construction shall be completed in accordance with the Vermont Agency of Transportation Standard Specifications for Construction" 1990. hereafter tolled Vermont Highway Specifications, specifications found on these plans and City/Town Specifications. In case of conflict, the more stringent specification shall apply as determined by the Engineer. J. The Contractor shall follow Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) Section 203.11 for placing and spreading embankments. 4. Fill material for rood embankment shall be approved by the Engineer. Fill shalt be placed in 12' fifty, wetted and compacted with sotr'slactory compaction equipment to 95X of maximum density (Standard Proctor). 5 Road in fill sections shall be placed and compacted a minimum of 3 feet above top of any utility to be installed before trench is excavated for pipe placement in trenches and cut sections, the Contractor shall provide o// necessary sheeting, shoring and bracing to maintain compliance with all OSHA/VOSHA regulations. 6. Methods for construction of subgrode shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) 203.12 or as determined by the Engineer. 7. Any subgrode or subbase disturbed by Contractor, or rendered unsuitable by construction machinery, shall be removed and replaced with approved granular bockrill at the Contractors expense. The subgrode shall be compacted to attain at least 95% of the maximum density (Standard Proctor) before placing rood or embankment materials. 8. The Contractor shall be responsible for coordination of compaction in the road and utility trenches. 9. Sand fill shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifrcotfons (1990) 703.03, Table 7O3.03A. Granular borrow shall conform to the Vermont Highway Specffcations 703.04 Granular Borrow, Table 70304A. 10. Grave/ subbase for pavement shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) 704.05, Table 704.05A, coarse. 11. Leveling course shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) 704.05, Table 704.05A, fine. Shoulders shall conform to Section 704.12, Aggregate for Shoulders. 12 Bituminous concrete pavement shall conform to Vermont Highway Specifications (1990) Section 404 and 406. Binder course .shall be Type Z and finish wearing course shall be Type Ill. 13Embankment fi// for rood and parking shall be o sieve specification as follows.- Sieve %Finer 4" 100 2" 85-100 j4 60-100 /200 12 maximum 1. In addition to the above requirements, all water fines and sewer /fines and manholes shall be thoroughly tested by the Contractor in accordance with the Environmental Protection Rules 9110182, Appendix A, Section A-02(✓&K), A-04(G&H) and Chapter 6, Section 802. 2. No water main shall be closer than ten (10) feet to any sanitary sewer storm sewer or sanitary manhole and five (5) feet to any catch basin. Provide minimum of 18' vertical separation between water main and storm/sonftary sewer. J. All manholes shall be vacuum tested in the presence of the Engineer. The manholes shall be tested prior to bockfifl. Test procedures and pressure shall be determined jointly by the loco/ approval agency and the Engineer. Failure of any vacuum test shall necessitate repair and/or replacement of the manhole and retest. Water testing manholes is not acceptable. 4. A// storm force mains shall be air tested in the presence of the Engineer. At a minimum, the test pressure shall be 4 pounds per square inch at the highest point along the test for 5 minutes 5. The Contractor shall keep a log book of at feast three swing ties to service locations and any points of deflection or water main fittings Books shall be turned over to the South Burlington Woter Department upon acceptance of the work. Elevations to the top of services shall also be recorded. Construction Notes 1. The Contractor will be responsible for all construction of water main, storm and sanitary sewer systems as shown on the plans. He will be responsible for all necessary adopters, fittings, etc. to make connections to the existing and proposed utilities The Contractor shall be responsible for a// work shown or implied on the plans and/or referenced in the specircations and permits. The Contractor shall submit for approval by the Engineer all types of materials and products used. Water Main 1. The pipe for water main shall be ductile iron class 52 manufactured in accordance with AWWA C151-76, as noted on the drawings All pipe sholl have push on type joints All fittings valves, etc. shall have mechanical pints. Pipe and fittings shall be manufactured by Clow, US Pipe, Johns -Manville, or approved equal. 2. All pipe shall be installed in accordance w/AWWA C-500. The pipe shall be kept free of foreign matter and debris during installation. When the process of pipe /oyfng has stopped any open ends of pipe shall be plugged. Mare shall be a minimum of 6 -O' cover over oll pipe and service lines. Any pipe deflection shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of recommended manufacturer"; maximum deflection. Backfill materials and procedures sholl be as detailed on the drawings. The Contractor shall be responsible for any and a// sheeting and/or shoring necessary to comply w/OSHA - VOSHA regulations. J. The testing of the wotermain shall consist of the testing of of/ installed pipe, services, hydrants, etc. The testing shall consist of o pressure test followed by a leakage test All testing shall be done with potable water and in the presence of the Engineer. The pressure test consists of mointoining o minimum internol ipe pressure of two hundred (200) pounds per square inch for two (2) hours. Foilure to hold the pressure (t/ 5 psiifor the specified time constitutes failure of the test for the particular section of pipe. 777e leakage test shall be conducted for one (1) hour Me time for the leakage test moy be included with the time of the pressure test. During the leakage test the quantity of water necessary to maintain the testing pressure of the system sholl be measured. The leakage shall not exceed the allowable values as shown in table 6 AWWA 0- 600. Failure of any test section will necessitate repair and/or replacement of the failed section. Working pressure and test pressure shall be determined jointly by Engineer and local approval agency. 4. Chlorinotion of the system shall be accomph'shed after the water main has been successfully pressure tested and thoroughly flushed. Disinfection shall be in accordance w/AWWA 0-601. The method of disinfection shall be approved by the Engineer and only after samples of water from the flushed disinfected main shows no evidence of bacteriological contamination. Use 50 mg// for 24 hours. The concentration must remoln above 25 mg/l. Tablet disinfection is not acceptable. Sanitary & Storm Mains 1. the pipe for sanitary sewer shall be PVC gravity sewer pipe MR 35 (ASTMO 3034) with rubber sealing rings. Storm line shall be ADS smooth Interior pipe. All pipe shall be laid to the fine and grade shown on the plans. 2. The installed sanitary sewer pipe shall be low pressure air tested in the presence of the Engineer. After pipe cleaning, the pipe section (manhole to manhole) shall be tested according to the following procedures.• An internal pipe pressure of 4 pounds per square inch greater than any bock pressure due to a water table shall be created. A minimum of two (2) minutes shall be allowed for temperature stabilization. The pipe section shall be considered acceptable when, tested at a pressure of 3 pounds per square inch greater than any back pressure, the section does not lose air at a rote greater than 0.DOM cfm/s.f of internal pipe area. Erosion Control and Construction Seguence 1. The purposes of erosion control shall be discussed with and approved by the Engineer and the City of South Burlington prior to any clearing, grubbing, stripping or construction of any kind. 2. All erosion control shall be placed as shown on the drawings or as ordered by the Engineer. All erosion control measures shall be, of a minimum, inspected weekly and maintained to fu/fill the intent discussed above. fie Contractor shall maintain the erosion control measures until the Engineer is satisfied that permanent ground cover has been established and that further measures ore not required. J. When erosion control measures ore deemed no longer necessary, a// materials detained including silts and construction debris shall be collected and disposed of in a manner acceptable to the Engineer and the City of South Burlington. 4. /f highly erodible soils are encountered the Contractor may be required to provide jute matting, gobion or rivet mattresses, rip rap or other measures as necessary to prevent erosion. The Contractor shall stockpile hay bales to protect, at a minimum, o// work fin progress. A// exposed embankments shall be topsol/ed, seeded and mulched as soon as possible after construction. 5. The Contractor shall use water and/or calcium chloride for dust control Me Contractor shall also sweep a// roods as required to maintain dust control. Stoeclflcotlons• A 2 1/2" Bituminous pavement I" Type /V Wearing course 1 1/2' Type // Base course 1. Ilre moterid subbase depothown s shors minimum regy/rynenf ;� in estlgatlon of aasthg sa# conditions is requfred and d4p;; cTW on exhtfn sort cmditons, the subbase g depths may change if Shoulder Shou/der / r-arnmeri0i'd by an indep-dent geotechnrca/ wlgheer. 0'-6" 8.-b Tro 0=6" Lone 2 GeotextJe fabrics shall meet the mquirements of VAOT seetim 720 for roadbed subgrode and underdroh trenches. � t 1 3 It t 4" Topsoil (,Jr.) J. Sand baro. shall meet the requianent of VAOT SubsebaW 7030J. ' 4. Crave✓ boss sha// meat the Moo Subsecf 7Qi 04. ....... ...... .�... .. .._ .. '::: ........:....:.. m repuirema��y;/ ) 5. Crushed eroro/ shW1 meet the reoutementSvbf .Uihrwcll 7/11/i5 % \ 1- crushed //VA,OT 6. Crushed store shall meet the requirements of W `� ���SSS...,,,666sschm 704. 10.E "i7 610 STope to GeotextrYe Iobric J Minimum 24" grave/ U O orighal ground (Typical) °-YOp t2' Grovel base 8 r Wide Bike Path n. t. s. 91 Construction Notes 1. The methods and materials of construction shall conform to the latest standards of the State of Vermont and City of South Burlington, all work shall be in conformance with a// permits and approvals issued for the project. /n case of conflict, the more stringent specification shall apply as directed by Engineer. All work shall be done in a workmanlike manner and completed in the time specified by Owner. 2 The Contractor shall be responsible for all work and moterio/s shown and required to make the jab complete. These drawings do not show every fitting or appurtenance. Materials shall be as specified on the drawings. Manufacturers product specifications shall be submitted for oil moteria/s to the Engineer for approval prior to instollotion. J. The location and size of existing underground utilities is not warranted to be exact or complete. The Contractor shall field locate all utilities and shall contact the affected utility company, the Engineer and the City of South burington prior to making any hook ups. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for a// existing utilities and their uninterrupted services. All off —site bockfill, sheeting and shoring, dewotering, clearing and grubbing, erosion control, dust control, traffic control, grading, and all incidentals shall be included as part of the required work. 4. Repair of all disturbed areas, grading, seeding, mulching, repair of roads and curbs, paving, and other incidentals are included as part of the required wank. All disturbed areas shall be loomed and mulched until permanent ground cover is established. 5. The Contractor shall verify all temporary bench marks before use, 6. The workmen and public shall be protected by the Contractor from any and ail hazards connected with the construction work. Open trenches, materials, or equipment within the working limits are to be guarded by the use of adequate barricades or flagmen. All barricades left in position overnight are to be properly lighted. Kerosene pots are not acceptable. When work narrows the usable pavement, 17cgmen shall be employed to aid the flow of traffic so that there will be no undue delays. The Contractor shall be held responsible for the safety of al/ workmen and the general public and all damages to property occurring from or upon the work occasioned by negligence or otherwise grow/ng out of a fallure on the part of the Contractor to protect persons or property from hazards of open trenches, materials, or equipment at any time of the day or night within the working area. All work shall be in conformance to OSHA regulations, 77t/e 19, Ports 1926.651 and 7926.652, and applicable to VOSHA regulations. 7 The Contractor shall verify ol/ utility intersections and contact Engineer and Owner with conflicts. 8. The Contractor shall call, Dig Safe prior to any excavation. 9. The Contractor shall coordinate final location and inverts for water sewer, and storm building connections with the Architect, Structural Engineer, and Mechanical Engineer. 10. All new sanitary and storm pipes shall be laid with o loser to elevation and slope as shown on the plans. General Grading and Site Work Notes 1. All area disturbed and all areas within the c/eoring limits shall be graded and covered with a minimum of 4" (10.2 cm) of compacted loom topsoil. The areas to be loomed shall be free and clear of roots, waste materioi and other deleterious material. Topsoil shall be spread and lightly compacted to a depth of 4" (10.2 cm). Topsoil shall be approved by the Engineer. All side slopes are to be loomed. 2. All turf establishment shall be in accordance with Section 657 of the VT Standard Specifications 1990. Mulching shall follow seeding by no more than 24 hours. J. All cut slopes shall be no steeper than Jh on Iv. All fit/ slopes shall be no steeper than 2.5h on iv. 4. The Cnnt—tpr shnQ —i r/_ch/rh nn� .o_rLcling _end rafter r10 ,Aer 75th, unless approved by the Engineer.rn, 5. Temporary silt fence shall be erected prior to any clearing or construction. Fencing may be erected in phases, but in no case shall construction of clearing proceed fencing. Special areas may be designated by the Owner far preservation of existing trees. These areas shall be the Contractor's responsibility to insure no damage l's done to designated trees. 5. Existing plantings are located in general areas as shown on this plan. Contractor shall protect plantings so as not to damage these or their root systems. 7. Slope stability based upon unsaturated soil conditions. If during construction saturated soils ore encountered, contact the Engineer immediately. - e Single Ramp On Comer Radlue Narrow Grass Strip Between Sldewalk and Curt) 5'-6' Single Ramp on Tanoont, Narrow Gross Strip 8 $Itle ��Olk Ram JJa 2.5 � i tt twwe) �v 1/4' reveal C11rt1 bone lion B JX max ' Roadway Sidewalk Ramp SECTION A —A cam SECTION C—C Auxiliary Texturwd A.Am,y sidewalk ro Raunding� ram 5'-6' min. width ram SECTION B—B NOTE: Contact City of South Burlington to confirm romp epeclfications prior to construction. Stormwater Skstem Maintenance Schedule 1. The stormwoter system is comprised of any portion of the site that directs or conveys water. 2 All ditches and swa/es must be Inspected regularly and repaired as required, Special attention must be given to winter time ice conditions. J. Each year a written report shall be submitted to: The Department of £nWronmenta/ Conservation NPDES Permit Section Annex building 70J South Main Street Waterbury, Vermont 05676 4. The report shall provide the dates and nature of cleaning operations carried out in the preceding year. Hay rjp/co/ a// /, _ Inlet Protection N.TS 16, to pokvrg. aow,setar .seas., I Rods threaded on both mds with nuts Y hr par tP ro JY Use s/ae lugs for 30' Co/kvntred t?" Rr pms ow JY and JS' only. vary or steel Use connector lugs for 11" to 24' on/y. L Alternate Calnectlon• -Notes• 1. Toe plate to be punched to match holes in w A skvt lip. J/8' galvanized bolts to be fumished Length of toe plot. is W + 10' by 12' to JO' diameter pipe Mc/usim and W + 22' far 36" to Plan 48' diameter pipe hol.siva, Reinforced edge s 7Qe H Toe plate 2' f 8" Holes 121c.c. max. spackr Oewtion Connector sect/an , ]I oe p/ate Crass Section 2. Skk-t section her /2' to 24' d/omater pipe Inclusive to be mode M one piece. J Skirt section for 30' to 48' diameter ppe /ndus/ve may be mode from two sheets jok d by H-tl g or boiling on center line with 3/8" galvanized rivets or bolts 4. Connxtor section, comer plate and toe plate to be some gage os skirt and each to be gal—Lred. ¢ Okmeter 7hlc* Oknerrslons Slope Body A B H L W fY klac ls_� 1 1 1"t 24 24 0.064 19 1 1J 1 6 1 47 48 12-1/2 1 pi End Section Detoll nts Dote rev'd IDeocrip lion _.._ .necked Dote Design M,.9 Drawn SW De toils Checked Scale n.t.a O Brien Home Farris Date Noy ], zX, Pro ct OO1B2 LYd Form Rood South Budin ton, al .YREB.S d' L.lNS'INC ConsvLslts"rtg A'ngineere, Ins. �:.�- ' �� 16� A(ain .Streef Colchester, Vermont 05446 N07E 1. lop may be made directly to ductile iron cote w1ws .shot! be A. W. W.A. C 500-e0 Standard Cote pipe. With other pipes use either o coupling laws with mechonica' J0kts of sizes as required ronta/nin9 olfactory -tapped brass bushing or th m e p ins All ­Ives anal be of roar or ductAe Fiane co - use bad -//e/ brass seat; non -risk stem. use o double strap service clamp.Fhlsn erode x P g Neenah R-1642, slope to droln Inside screw, double dLsk conefructlon with O' Rhg 2. All tops larger than 3 4' require the use of bronze saddles. Le6arm LC 265 w equal Stain Sea: All whss to be P rtj � 9 sgsroped with o w/ro box J. All brass unions and adopters shall be Mueller, for o minknum of 6 feet (6) of cow inate/jol. The P gate °dros preswro o nt prise and be designed of McDonald. Cost !n place concrete for o working 4. The Contractor shall not install curb box in ._L_ rMr. Use class 8 concrete 6' (J,500 psi) between cast sidewalk or pavement, 6, from, and pncort 5. Submit shop drawings to Engineer for a// j comet, manhole Cost lroa row marked water" components of the water system. - ASTN 0476 Precast r&#,f c d in grade )1 Pra de cast k place cwncrete manhole and rover Access cop steps. by Camp Precast Qlswold or equal. 6 =12" p/ostlr�z gs /th �2 Ad slob/e 6tn cun5 bufl /a IIII o cross countr O' Rkg gasket m Mastic st a curb box with co �e,- 1/2" grade 60 she/ 4=0' 'u reinfimrn,nt or ,quo/ yt Do not mortar ersrde lace 7e/esaopic curb box, ° 6'mh. row buffo/a type � �+, of manhole. Mueller N-10334 or $ Topping saddle Use 4 miL payetnyrsne opprottsd aqua/ /f re -!real Manhole she// be vacuum tested 'c i q 5- while lowest )olrnt !s aril sxposad coronet, w/,e oral New corporation slop Mueller E N-15008 or approved equal 'O Asphalt cooted ,° ° Cost fi p/ore er press seal Horizonlo/ +� gasket for a/ pipe penetrotims Wok.- male Curb stop, Mueller frost loop%%% Closs 9 concrete air S'tnA. H-15200 or approved equal / Water main red hardened brick �+ f shelf and Invert ° 1 ,', � . ,. • Water service t e k copper '6 mA o ;n �/ Flow 1 e na,et, thrust black ,1 :: ::. ° Undkturbed ,roll m t rb feda thrust block detal/ L_ Undisturbed soil -4 XB solid concrete block B MmdlMic boa, action See water trench detail ink. %VD%Co/ Gate Valve for bedding requirements N. 7.S Undisturbed material covnnpact,d 1Stan, � Water Service Detoi/ N 7� Typical PrecastManhole N. T. S Na7tx 7hruse block 1. The locution of sewer moths In relation to water mans shay be k occardmce with the 7ieconmended Standards for Existing 8" water main Sewage Worts' sa-rolled Ten State stmdards and Water Sk,pp/y Rules 2 Severs shall be lad of least 10 abet horizmta/y fro, my T e Arthg or prgoosed water moh. The dletance shay be 6 ';e` •' Arse of beerinp measured wigs to edge /f this distance cannot be obtained, L K der T' cw�ar b oyehst undisrurbd Man th, pipes sho// be krstolled according to E,-g Choptr 1• earth Appendix 14 11o. J IB'seponrOon shall be malntoked wh,ther water is ow r 0.0h.bed sarM under sewar if this d/stance cannot be Mtahed them the .SQCAM Elevation PRias sho// be installed omwdhg to EPR Choptr 1, 116, Note Andhorme of Vb/►ee Topping sleeve and valve by pow, worn moth New 8' water service i Mueller or A rhnrar blear r,mr a hsraid or av water moh appro►rd BQUo% bwrds, mlro redu-m and caps and tsar 18" ink. Contact Champlain Water District and Net top shall be Installed by persons ukkun oe• Undi tubd,as� U" m� g the Engineer 48 hours prior to top. approved by chomp/aft/ water District Sows Adl IsnpM of,*& ROW DUsion and the £ng/neer carrohem 6urkW gat, w/ro wlMts eW.1 and conosaxrir r••• banbd Tmica/ raooinq S/,eve and I/o/ve Select bockh7/ compoctsd pole inv. detoN abo j - - + - h 6" (152 ran) layers-95X standard NT.S proctor density 6' (M2 an) mh.enCrossings late bench snr thaGetu•Md sal Sewws crossing water mapth s shot/ be laid beneath e water moh with ftyPk'•i)- � • ' • ' of /east le hones nrt/ca/ a/eamnce between the outside of the sewer ya/W/17eod End Reducer and the outs/alr of the water mole. "en /t /s passible to maintain the 18' wticai seowtlon: Notw Pion 3 m2 (mh,*,-) 1.) the crwsshg shol/ be arranged so that me full length of sewn is mod/ try •�'�o pdpMymvs edeet bst,.ewn centered ahoro or below Me wntr line with sewer pints as kr os ai c W- inn et moor, - Ott' pass bye /roan rotor m nty' " and 7 p til-t a to rfip to 12 ex6f z) the sever pipe must be crosfrucfed to rota moh etondoa3 /o :.,f, pre_, bond 7bs Cmtrocta- shay be o mhklum d/atmee of 20 feet elthr aide of the croas/ng or o total - reepons6/e Ave cwnplAg p,Ned r/nParod of fleas, pine /ength4 wtdchew le grrotar,- '.i,w1M 0-WA W-WA :mound e/40Wd .1) the section Constructed to water stmdaros must be pressure repsrrotkna tested to mointoth 50 psi for 15 mhutes without leakage prkr to a-CoveN;v -1O .,-.hJ VV _ �,,,' SSW ..: _.... boc Filing beyond me foot above the pPe to assure watt tightness d% where a roar un main crosses dr o sewer adequate stv turo/ ball; �sfc o1 Aflhgs FhM beck/?/ moterim eaho0 ...:.I support she/ be provided f¢r the sewer to present danoye to Me Undbbnbad eoe cmtoh arms, prmtr �f4}:.:. ...F!'.. _. i water maIn. no R'� Min J" h d/arnatr, no ;:;,Wgndard etma4ret:;; Tee 90', 45,22 1/2,° k unnac nay a poeht-t: (AAsh1p-r-MV% Sewer Water Separation to/7 Or 1! 1/4°840nd Prop h 12" bare end eampxt m hdkotad `. i N. r.S VhM$t Block Details . N. T.S U e m site mad fly !w- eack/w haunts/no oral hlNa boot fly Minimum Area of Bearing Surface of Concrete Thrust Block (in square feat) - ,+.. lkratla hoc., a 52, � - - rsau nn I J' 4' 6' tY 12 CCWD1770N SOF R°'�''0• 1040tPsr) ass eu oat we as a. aas tar we aa. .ezarc as as ec s ae sss eu as as Q5 Q5 Q5 Q5 Q5 1.0 Q5 Q5 to L5 1.0 Q55 to 40 '55 ,10 L5 Scrmd akin, 10,000 1.0 1.0 1.0 Q5 1.5 20 1.0 Q5 .10 40 20 1.0 t&S 5 20 1Q0 /4 7.5 40 rO 4,000 TO 1.0 1.0 Q5 20 Lt5 T5 to .15 SO JO 1.5 0 2.5 UOM5 1Q0 S0 p.,^d .1000 T5 25 1.5 1.0 25 ,15 20 1.0 S5 7.5 40 20 0 .15 Q027. ISO BO000.10 45 25 1.5 SO 7.0 40 2.0 Q5f30 SO 40 .0 70 ag4dwAlAd Sort soy 7,Oa0 am.+r ae ewer pars _ ww Ps (lanes eaAn'2 ) ne p . 4 r 1 cg7apr C t undr Poo pp (Md/sturbsd motrk✓ E rota t -cd h to • fiecs't Han oumh' n, ml. ,bhtc p{oe 'penal/ ,and shim b�'" rd� Desfgn M'� Drawn StfN Checked Scale n.T= n<otee 1 Oore .Sealer /'`voter Details O Brien Home Farm ryp/ca/ Water Trench Details Date M y 1 2001 N.TS Pro' ct Lb16? Old Form Rood South 9ur/ir tin vermmt KREB.S aQ' L,1N.S/NG Consulh"ng �°nyineers, Ina ..,:;"� ""' 13 16< 1i(ain .Strwe4 Colchester, Yer7nont 08446 1 ...... ...... -___ PAwwNT OWSS CLYMMY Use high strength Removable square_ case iron grate pavement welded AIL ILnon-shrink grout /17 Iron frame3on J' x J/B J/6 ong/e 1 angle iron legs. Provide 6- dear ✓dro cover marked Pond overflow Men/n9 al/ sides. Contractor shall Sewer" or Storm" Watertight cop marked cleanoul' submit shop drawings /or approval occcrdMg to use.-11 !0' r Cost lion vo/ro box 6" 5' top or approved aqua 45' bell and spigot elbow (4 /n/et Welded Fiber pocking between 'Doe and w/ve boz PW SDI? 35 J' diameter ; tge 4' PVC MR 35 £xlse/og ground ✓ermart State Standards Minh' 140x Type // rip rap Aow 6' Pic SDR J5 fdl 0Wr Pipe Emergency Spi//wa Detail e ° N. T S 43" wye for /n Ifne deanouts (6' X 4 ) See plops far invert . ° 4.5 deanoulis d 4Dg-eotfor to 47 terminal elevot/aos. `° 1B'ADS-Nf2 Sanitary / Storm C/eonout Detail Uti/ed holes —..y N. T..£ )O' Bohan basin pica-st pace cr pressed 1B' sump d/ p/Pe ns.J' dia. monolithic concrete base •� ` �� "v. •� ' ;s min. 12" oJ7<e o compacted ° gravel, a a New Detention Basin Out/et Detail N. T.S. 10'a✓ os shown on pions All catch Doshs sha/ Os loAY agohst the curb whl,e moMtohhg fa/ occest --Concrete curb, see dotal, F e and grate, rnnr�° sgoe [.Boon tF244 a egos ro e n wtn own yMTMd- ._P` F�✓.A� 1 JhM pwN ✓ C l� 1'✓ 4�/'`< h »^?b Y "4a b 4.N CotM bosh by Come. Lh'sxntd w a.Ct b1'.. y „t,_ •' •r� *9 - 4,000 PA' cmcret � 1=D -1 i5 �„ '`S�i.-9�,-Stets reinhrred to A51A/ 5pecx f �.. �'y♦,. }}} - AASHrO N-27 wheel lood f' d1a. _ 9N, �t.•,O"rio9 -.y t+J, P "..- .. I '1` butyl rope. 1 'f= ItIPI cost el th ce ex r oveq to m4atch e'Wh' 6' *— ran hr> I^rot7ne Comroctw shd/ be Use unvawd P'osr� - w/ar eh t%r7'/,gvd• t Pmel o Jar rM. -P-- Ale Jw- co-Plyln9 powd r t /M OSHA - ✓ -WA o r"o-1ay ",,.♦ / A i- re9u/ot/ons or •9u m� cement f7 r y. mound a'/ghtly 6D s el re' M/st and 3^' D� ouf/el pies �onoxn an 0 r r• �'' r -, 3 MondlebM bore t f shah' / / 24 12' deep Type I stone Bouthl/ moterb/ shod 9DX � be Ada- Mon /�/ t Ana° canteh no stapes My d out Wewlk». 6--.� , .... .......� per ✓t. Sosc 706.04 ar g eater :, .,standad I tondaw'.: ` .•.• / / / titan 3" M d/ametar o :�: Proctor Pmatal rs ... ... �,.• ,-. r/ / / -` a9anM 12Lrtol P/oro M 2' /iks and ttvnpool as M.ted 24' deep Type 1 stone 3/4" fo 1 1/2' crushed stave per ✓t. Spec. 706:04 .'7` Unossturbeo' moterid IIty1Gn,�u... r - 1in4etial/�.rd + i—j ','/CO/ GOtCh tIOS%n y soson t� i� sons ni ror ar NTs a. (. Mirof, 50OX fabric t/ndnturbed -at x w'—_ 6 ADS smooth M -f-fstorm , under and to sides , of store Tp 1o' or as shown on plans f a/ StWM / anitfy TrW4:* D&tO#Swak—fl O.Szfm of n F�' Q'OSs .Section 0.5X Jo- 10' 0' N.T.S. Dote -Ad D—Otke Dote Storm Ou tfall D"'9r' A4 9 De tails Drawn SW nts Checked Spate n.ta O Brien Home F(3 m Date Mar 1, "' Project 001e2 A'd Form Rood South BurJin ton ✓ermont .�R�BS aB TENSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. � c '"- �'4 ........................... . 1B4 Alain Street, Colchester, Pemwnt O"41e _ 2'x 2'x J' stokes owfep edges i! swa/e bored hoy or straw embankment s/cps existing ground 50, NOM, To be used .h /ocatims where the existhg ground slopes in toward the toe of the embankment. 1"x 2' x J' stokes Plan Kew Baled Hay or Straw Erosion _Checks_ N. i. S Erosion Control Notes 1. Ttte limit of disturbance shall be clearly defined by Engineer prior to clearing. Erosion control shall be established to trap sediment on site. 2. The site shall then be cleared and grubbed. All roots, stumps and deleterious materials shall be removed from the site. The Contractor shall minimize the amount of disturbed land at any given time. J. Al/ erosion controls shall be installed as detailed in the publication Vermont Handbook far Soil Erosion and Sediment Control on Construction Sites. 4. All erosion control shall be placed as shown on the drawings or as ordered by the Engineer. The Contractor shall maintain the erosion control measures until the Engineer is satisfied that permanent ground cover is established and that further measures ore not required. 5. The erosion controls shall be checked regularly by the Engineer. Any necessary repairs or modifications shall be immediately completed by the Contractor. 6. All excess material and topsoil shall be stockpiled In areas approved by the Engineer. These stockpiles shall be surrounded by hay bale erosion control dams and shall be seeded and mulched to minimize erosion potential as directed by Engineer. 7. As disturbed areas are graded and topsolled, they w111 be seeded and mulched to reduce the erosion potential of the soil. 8. Any drainage swa/es with a slope greater than 5x shall use a stone 11n1ng for stabilization. See Engineer for detail. 9. When erosion control measures ore deemed no longer necessary, a// materials detoined, including silts and construction runoff debris, shall be collected and disposed of in a manner acceptable to the Engineer. 10. The Contractor shall use water and/or calcium chloride for dust control 11. fie Contractor shall provide hoy bole in/et protection around each catch basin prior to pavement and turf estoblishrnent. See Detail Sheet. 12. The Contractor shall sweep Kennedy Drive, Hinesburg Road, and new pavement as required and d/ratted by the Engineer to mo/nto/n dust control. 13 All erosion controls shall be installed prior to October 1 for winter construction. 74. Additional erosion controls sholl be installed as directed by the Site Engineer. 15 The Engineer will regularly inspect the erosion controls in place to ensure their proper installation, 16. All disturbed areas not involved in winter construction shall be mulched and seeded before O^tabar 1. 17. All winter construction areas will be stabilized by mulch for winter/spring meltdowns and when winter construction has halted. Note.• Sediment shall be cleaned out when /t has rroched hat the height o1 the lance or before map- predicted rohhd/ event. Remora Ot fence after sucrossfu/ sstob/ishment of ntgetot/on. Steed stakes dH— on dawnsti skle of lance Snow fence ar .Hkofr E W-fence Public ngn t-of--way Mhos, En Hrohnce an 4; Mkot7 too, 'Tter fabric F7/t- fabric an upstream side staple lobnc to /snav rah. Fenn 12' deep trench \ SYoke A ....-'.. lay fobrfc h bottom cv per with Sank✓ Fence Existing ground Prolye Provide appropriate trmsitkn between StobAized Canstrvctim _ Entrance and Pub/le Right Baffost Flow E of way I I N f'ub/ic I Existhg 20' f f,2 to T Right of I V I II I ground ertane way I Section A —A A J I+I to be hstood at So' to 75' lnterMls depending on pitch, or as shown on plans, P/on Stabilized Construction Entrance Note.• Sedhnent she/ be cleaned out when it has reached half the height of the hay bale or before coop- predicted rainfall entnts Remo- hoy boles after successfu/ establishment of vegetoti n erica/ Temporary Si/t Fence Erosion Con trot Barrier N. T.S A// wives snail be AWWA appro-d fie Cmeroctcr shdi coalkm hydrant manufactured by Muw1w,, Clow or spec/Acatian w/fh Munlelpa/lty before onferhg. approved equal All wives shall be Hyvhant shall be /n accordance with AWWA Hay bole barrier - 2 rows Steel stokes driven through bales (or erect teen counterclockwise. C-502 J-way post type breokaway, Mueller Super snow fence m downstream side of bo/asaardi-of bole; stagger �bhts� w Kennedy K-BIA Centurion 250,,12' hose n a 4,,' Prow'de rer/ectcr h path two 1v'hose nozzles and cos t,i' pumper Secure bunop bag over Set bole Into bank - to untilnozzle. accordance with hydrant anti/ Munlnpal Slondord placed into service. be m1alled at 50' to 75' 1 I interwls, depending m I , NMONTI 4 =0' min. pitch , or as shown an p/cos 11 h U 9 Adrbst bM cost kw �f V wive bar with m 'water' coorse gro W A/ter (or use 8reekoway pint morked S Water mo/n Men fabric - M6of/ 10ae- t)plool al/ Mints set ,into ground and fired p ndlsturbed acrth, typ/oa/ over hay bales) I b erica/ Ha Ba/e Concrete thrust block _Temporar Erosion Con trot Barrier Thrust block- 6' dL 1/52 water m undblurbed moterkV. (see detail) (.see thrust block detail) N.T.S. I cmrpac�lad gro vN 'J�i" crv�hed elm. ` l6 mM V �- Hydrant tee 12' of 3/4' stone All hydrant drohs she/ under ram be parmmenby plugged Notes: Use J ml po/yMthwvne 1. Cmboctor shol/ poht hydrants between concrete and h accordance with Mun/clpol fitting (typ/rn1) Standoros after low test by Typical Hydrant Detail Mun/clpo/ity /n areas Mara freebowd Is .-noble Z. cmnoctor sha/ provide - awing tins for a/ water /he use 1 on 2 back slopes - seed and bends and elbows mulch ..V 1� Al gands 3. / Md /shol/ be � ' Afegaiug' air gapro-o' aqua/ �'�•,:- — ----T vent--- -vent--vent d � �F� boa Z Dore rr�ixd oeecr�ran .cnxrre bore T—I 0.5 T d/4 r Design M.,9 �EtCri�S' 0.75 T Parabolic Grassed Waterway Section Drawn Swt/ '• .. O Brien 'OM e Farm N. S Checked SCCE /Ills, Date uoy r, row Pro 1.ct 00162 0/d Form Rood South Bonin tan Vermont KIIZBS eQ I, lNSING Conseclt4fty engineers, Ina. �� Moo (Vain S'tree4 Colchester, Vermont OS"C TOWNHOUSE STREET AND COMMUNITY PLANTINGS • "�� �/ lip" v�� ,�!!?p• O � �� low Allis 0 Q*4 son .� �A� WTI MAI -�'� Ayr eAraavf ' arK JIlA1� 1 �6t / ab4 �1 I _ 1 1 'I r 1 r I r I i I Code Sae_fn rJeme Common Neme SIn Spec Comments AL AMELANCHIER L-1, AYeghen Servkebe 6.6 M. us 30 AR ACER nrbrum'Rad Suneer Red Sunut 2d.6' CN. B&D 5 AS ACER socchemm'Omen Mo 10Y Omen Mountain Sugar le 2.2.6' colt Bie 30 P BE7ULA P er 6•ch a-ta nt. eie 3Sbm CkwV 17 C CRATAEOUS cue alY'honk' Thomisse Cooke ur HavAhom 1.6-21cal. 86B 23 GTH LEDITSIALWHalre Hain Hon st 2-2.5w COL B&D s " LD UARIX deoldua European Larch 6.8' M. B&S 8 MA1hU8 Fbdbunds Flowhp Crab 1.6.2'cal. B&B 24 PN PINUS Maps Austrian Phe 51-V Is. B&B PS PtNUS I.b.. Ah1. Pits V-V Is. B&B 8 PSC PRUNUS urprIll Se ant Ch. 2-2.V cal. B&a IQ QB GIX:RCUS Dkolor Svam WhU Oak 2-2.5' nl. B6B 22 OR GUERCUS ruble Red Osk 2-2.6' cal. B&S 6 SA SALI X elbe'TYytY oaiden Woe . W111- 2-2.5' eel. Bee 6 R SYRINGA nikulela lJopenes. Twe Lae a'a' m. Bab must Ham 16 TO THUJA occilentalI, NI nt' Dark Am•dcan Arbowbe a M. BOB 60 TCO TILIAc ntateOmm YM" omens Io Lmeleol Laden 2-2.61cal. Bee Gl . Cod.1 Sebnlee Neme Common Name eae Sec 7 AR IA Inelanocarpa Black Chokeberry 34 M. 86B • CLETHRA alnifolla'Com acata' Compact Summem"et 2 gal. cord. 25 GAM COR S alba' meoana inah' Variegated Red-TvAo Dogwood 3-# M. B&S 10 PS FO S IA'N.H.GOItl' New Ham shire Gold Forsythia 3-'M. cant. 26 JCP JUNIPERUS ch.'PStzedana Com acts' Compact PMzer Juniper 18.24' BaB 31' O.C. 41 MO MICROBIOTA decussate Russian Cypress 15.18' cam. 6' O.C. 4 sB SPIRAEA malda'Anthon Waterer AnthonyWaterers Irea 2.5J'ht. corn. 10 TMD Tau$In la.D.nsiformis' Dare* Spreading Yew 18.24'ht. me LIGHTING KEY TSHEET L4 FOR pFl ONS7 GE M-250 CUTOFF Rim K M NY 11 1i m` ` O QUALITY LIGHTING DESIGN 129 My JZ My out ee* QUALITY LIGHTING DESIGN 129 ad J I I .. ,� (W/HOUSESHIELD) Mk a I GE WALL LIGHTER 250 ew CB I i I I r KIM LIGHTINGCFLI V. J26.41 (5 y • %� ' II ,. C— j l I I I •`"/ � �r I1111 I , I� \I 1� :.R II New C8 AM 362.4 Mv. 357.8 My ud 3W05 Boyle and Associates rerakne sae rs.isions °zla O'Brien Brothers landscape arohRoots splanning consultants MJB 0614-01 j e"a P.O. Box 2184---------- b bIYK. a ��r ien Farm South Burlington, VT 05403 _ 301 college street ebudln2ton .vennont .05401 802 $58 3655 hnp9MwwAJboyy.com o wk Landscape and Lighting J� r APARTMENT AREA PLANTING Coda 8cen6Ao Name Common Now an camlwlb T AL AMELANCHIER Lawle All 8eM d h-L on 12 AR ACER rubrurn Red Will Wd Bowl 2-2.WaY. INS 1 AS ACER aeccherum Nissan Moure id Green Moumain Si Maple 2.2.6' all BBB 22 BP BETULA Papy0form POW arch 111111. ON 3 stem Chow 2 CCI CRATAEGUB II'IrrennW Thonlon Codwpur Hmftm Ts-r al. a" 11 OTH GLEDIT81ALi. 1Yke' Hollis H ccust 2.1row. B6B 3 ME MAlA18 Florbmft Womma Cialmumvie 1.6.rorl. Sao 13 P6 PINUS ekobue WNM PIne V-T it, BBB 1 PSC PRUNUB i 22:1. a1, 1 13 QR QUERCUS nape Red Oak 2.2.6' al. BRB 36 TOG-nt.A codate'GlearrWe" Grw"pimiL sedunden 24roel. I BSB -Trims 10 oe plamea wl"In me pudic lcym away. al Coda scar"o Common No" axe 13 AM ARONIA mel Black Cholimberry 3w It us 12 CA CLETHRAalnifolis'Panlculah' Larce Panlded Summaraweet 2 gm. corn. 18 CAM ClRNU3 ala' teo-m IMte' Vailsiated Red-TvA 34' ht S" 21 FS : FORSYTHIA W.H.Gold' Now Hem ire Gold F la 3-'hL pent. 16 J6 'JUNIPERUSsabn6'BrcadMoof Broadrnoor Juniper 18.2,P oont 34O.C. 11 JCP IJUNIPERUS ch. P6turlarr Cantimowl Compact Pf mr Juniper 111I a" S-1'O.C. 20 MG MICROBIOTAdecummil Russian cypress 1&18• oont TO.C. 8 PM PINUS o'Mu ' Compact MPine 18-24' on 66 RR ROSA nGm Beach Rose 1&?A• Irt cant If O.C. 4 68 SPIR4EA burnalulaAnIhipty Waterer AndVry Waterer SpInga 2.6.3' M opt 12 SP SPIRAEA prurgill Btidalwreath Spires 2- 1 hL corn 10 SIC STPPHANANDRA incise ICnVW COW Stephanandre 200. opa. 21 8YA SVMPHORICARPOS elbus Common Snowberm 2-TM apt 5 TMO TAXU8 madie'Denstformis' Dense Spreading Yew 18.24•I1f. 1 a8B 1 1 Vr 11ASURNUM tilloburn _ Amerman Cranibel Vlillan-n 4-6'ht a.a Oroundeawn & Mnentde Coda SO-11lc N. Common Name an 2D HH HEMEROCALLI3'Happy ReWmd Happy ReWma Def111yI tat. I apt rOC LIGHTING KEY (SEE SHEET L4 FORSPEORCAT ONO) GE M-250 CUTOFF ♦ QUALITY LIGHTING DESIGN 129 rim* QUALITY LIGHTING DESIGN 129 (W) HOUSE SHIELD) p GE WALL LIGHTER 250 o KIM LIGHTING CFL1 +� 01,00" _ / N lk / I i I ,?� a `��__e::f•°'�,!^ ' +i `�\ fib• ` ` � �� �; k s! ■ std m \S(5) Qb aim( \ N 12) \\ I F3�.3' \ � _ M(3�,. \\ (1 ; `4>� �\ L \ � �r \ \ `S.`"• O PM ` R(2) = _ C,O(B 1 P(5) AM(2) \ B(15) G' / P(8) AM(2Y''c \ y 1G) ` HH(RO g) JCPO) �jDI n -- --- --- (2) Nam. AL(5)ARI (g) RR(10 M(3). °j QR(2 / // / / - T=:a3= 3) RR(10) \ // /'/'/ i,� •_ cyi____= RR(4 BP(6) ; i'i 8 •� - �'6 g s �`uCi �de 7 R(3) (5 TH(2) CA \ ,"7i/ : ® P -' \ ohm .\ 3---------- ./ r rwlsions date revlsrons da<r O'BrienBoyle and Associates I eneetar -- - 'Brien Brothers - 84 landscapearchitects a planning consultants MJB 114-01 O'Brien Farm L 2 P.O. BOX 21err." arw _ SouthBurlin n,VT05403 301collegestreetabudinpton avenmont ao5401 802 eye 36M hftpJAw,w�J".com 1"=30' Landscape and Lighting Plan o� r. TRANSITION TO EXISTING GRADE, SAVE EXI5TING VEGETATION AND SUPPLEMENT ONSTREET EX15TING RESIDENTIAL WITH EVERGREEN SCREENING PARKING 2A' PRIVATE ROAD 5' SIDE Se(a) JCP(5 ' - O C/EO/70U t 329.4 ----------- I--------- I I - I I I I 1 1 PS(5) ` BP(5) I \ \ \ I \ \ ENTRY PLANTING AND SIGNAGE III = iol p ® PLANNED RESIDENTIAL BUFFER SCREENING PLANNED RESIDENTIAL r /� o - — - SECTION A — A' )II s )ol o ENTRY FEATURE SKETCH FRONT ELEVATION OF TOWNHOUSES NOT TO SCALE REAR ELEVATION OF TONNHOUSES NOT TO SCALE SITE LIGHTING STREET LIGHTS WITHIN PUBLIC ROW R ` M-230A2POWRJ000R'LUMINAIREWR8CUTOFFOPTICS MIr4,le a:•rl< n••<a ••:rll.t•n ra•n,l a:1 •.:tre I on no:usx rnl a eu p thm • n.r.1.•ra, to „I,,. e.t,. • ur•a.,urw.11 ur,�.r •eo:.. un„n n,nne,r omnn,ms rr:xl,a, •M Wrn,i11„nr,IlY;en„rFl-I:i oa�.4J •r.clAr l,wua nel:,r •1�erwwna -1-' •1�-- . NO • II,I.r,1 r r(�Mn v,l 41 11Jr IYd,.,l�hiiaa, •WIII,IIalaa,ul xptN.xN.ln.wr rMH,l.l,vrlAt •Ma11,:Ir11o,f,1,,, nrnr,-nn'„nr..t �[eruiririMlN *,1I .••.�ryy ORDERING INFORMATION: M2AC-25-M-I*-A*-I*-G-MC3-I-** AITO BE VERIFIED BY ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. **ELECTRICAL ENGINEER TO SPECIFY ADDITIONAL OPTIONS. QUANTITY: Iq POLE: 24' HT. STREET LIGHTS WITHIN PRIVATE STREETS rarra h fie• suvali;al.,y.. rhnrlll[f.Y l�//tlteiq ❑ Design 129 4v, ,r A'.,ITi n'�A• Hs ORDERING INFORMATION: * 12gL8173M.IES-20-2-VHSS-70MH-FL-BK-120*-BK-CL80X360 *VOLTAGE TO BE VERIFIED BY ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. QUANTITY: 26 POLE: 20' HT. * ORDERING INFORMATION: 12gL8173M.1 ES-20-2-V-70t-lH-FL-BK-120*-BK-CL80X360 *VOLTAGE TO BE VERIFIED BY ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. QUANTITY: 12 POLE: 20' HT. WAIPSH"Rz5u CUTOFF LUMWA/RE er.,rolrmnl,ee. wlr.rf•.•. � , vd >rin ,nr . Ilrr•swnvn••e•n .xn, nrai, nnmurla.. u" n�rmrnl non.." ORDERING INFORMATION: W25C-05-M-0-A-I-G-MED-DB QUANTITY: 2 �2��_ .'MM Compact Floodlight The quality yw expect from Kim Lighting In a compact. yet full featured luminaire. Coanpsct 1> I k 1. 6rigineer ad :: l •- .. ion,• �� ��, I.In i '.1, .wn1,,n•�.�... L. � .rr � s.. a_•� u•r I w•: n•ru .I; •rirr•Y,,• w•1 • ''I'�. /14A fAly"L . • . w • •aW.:rn 10M LIGHTING ;.. I. ,,,...uu-u•*r •.aaa•vca- :nv:,carc 0 ORDERING INFORMATION: CFLI/50MH120*/BL-P #VOLTAGE TO BE VERIFIED BY ELECTRICAL ENGINGEER BEAM CONTROL OPTION: FIXED HOOD- BD-CFL/BL-P QUANTITY: 2 SOUTH FACING TOWNHOUSE DETAIL I" - 20' NORTH FACING TOWNHOUSE DETAIL 111 = 20' SOUTH FACING TOWNHOUSES: 21 a. Code Scientific Name Carn—n Name She 3 ec Comments S AA ARONIAarbutifolie'Brillandeaime' Red Chokab 4-T ht gas 5 CA COTONEASTER a 1WIMe Cranberry Cotonesster 18-24" ht. cont. 34' O.C. 10 JFA I JUNIPERUS ch.'Pfltzer Autos' Gold TI 'LatzerJun 3 cord 4'O.C. 10 ROM RHOD.'01 a Mezltr OI a Mezm Rhododendron 10.24" ht, wM. 5 90F SPIRAEAbumalds'Goldflams' GoldflameSpires *3 cunt. 10 TMD TAXU3 medle'DaneHormis' Dense S readin Yaw 18-24"ht. S8B 5 VC VIBURNUM cadeall KManeplca or Mayflower Viburnum 2.2,5' ht. Door. O Code Scientific Name Common Name a" so. 10 EFV EUONYMUS fonunei Ve etus' BI leaf Wlntercres er 3041 con,. 20 HR9 HOSTA'Ro el 6tenderd' Ro al Standard Plantain Uly2 el. com. 15 SA SYMPHORICARPOS albus Common Snowbe 23' m. com. 15 TO THUJA occldentelle'NI re' Dark American Arborvitae 5' ht BaB 10 VT VIBURNUM traobum American Cranbe Vlbumum 34m BSB G Z vt NORTH FACING TOWNHOUSES: 21 Ctv. Code Sd*ntic Name Common Name Size SM Comments 18 AD A3TILBE'Diamond' Diamond A*dlbe 2qL eont 6 CAM CORNUS albs'lvory Halo' Ivory Halo Dogwood T ht. Bills 0 CS CLETHRA elnifolis'Com ecate' Compact Summemweet 2 gel, Cont. 8 EF EUONYMUS fonunsl1vo Jade' Ivory Jade Wintercree r 2 el. coot 18 HA HOSTA albomarginats Albomar mats Hosts 2 at, cant 18.24" O.C. 0 IOC ILEX glabra'Compacts' Dwarf Inkberry 2 gal. Cont. 0 PO PHYSOCARPUS o ullfolius name Dwarf Nineberk 2.3' ht 18.24" M. cont. US a RDA RHOO. cat.'Album' White Catawba Rhododendron 0 SA SYMPHORICARPOS albue Common Snowhe 2.3' ht coot. 8 TMD TAXUS madle'Densiformis' Dense S.—di.. Yew 111-24" M. BBB 100 1 VM VINCAminor 1 Bluets die 21/2" patCont. 15.18"O.C. MY Code Scientific Nam Common Nam Size S Comments 8 COT COTONEASTER divarasta Spreading Cotoneaster 2-3' m. comp 34O.C. 8 FNG FORSYTHIA'N.H.Gold' New Hampshire Gokt Forsythia 34 ht. Cont. 38 HH a ms a eturns 9 1 Nlilden 2 cant O.C. 24 IS IRIS . belrics'Camara Brother Caesar's ulher Ida 2 cont. 2' O.C. 8 JCP JUNIPERUS ch.'Pfltzedane Compacts' Compact Pfitzer Juniper 18-24" 18.24" B8B oars. 0 SF SPIRAEA japonice'Uttfe Princess' UOIe Princ Spires 18 To THWAocdre dentalis'NI ' Dark American ArborMare S'tn. BaS O'Brien Brothers landscape architects .planning consuttams MJB 0114.Ot O'Brien Farm j �1 amm elan.L- `/?I P. . Box 2184 301 college street • burlington avermont •05401 802 •658 M55 hep:rA—.tjboyie.com 1"- 10' South Burlington, VT05403 x - Landscape and Lighting Plan Georgetown Match Line — _ ♦ / — / — \, ♦ ♦ /� %' _ ' t � //�/ l�/r� l� lit i }\\ kj . \ �i � sew ,♦• � l ; /i //1/'1/ltl� it tj \ yam. \ forth ♦ II -� - o 4-: , /�/fl /. //// �l. \ \ Z� ♦ I, !/ ♦ ♦♦// NA" Y 2 8 R"ore\\\\ x� ♦ „� I I 4 6Y f,,•^'♦ ♦' �,� po: .' �'" / f \\ \ "`----.... 1, ♦ p+* .� i ! \ `fit $ I \ ♦ ' hyod. x er i \ \ \'\ \ l z `t < ♦ ♦ / / �'' \ \ . '\ \ \ \ i stir ....1 / ♦♦ ; ".. 1e / Match Line NOT£.• The Intersection of the proposed rood with Kennedy Dr/ye /s shown far Alustrottl purposes Actual /ntesection design w171 be by others. Kenryedy Or/`e j 'Not StabiAzed ,rW � turn oni aonstmation - Yentrance / LYP t .wwg m sta i _eoo It J I � i i'�✓ �� 1/ll1 `. / a:� 1 ,.. .fit-. '.� \\ �i �\ \'\ \ I ` ' 1 { � etlend 13Tjpe�! / / to 3tormwoter / / / /. .. yta-- — — — \ 4 n :.. C� EPisfMer G'ne prox. P-party a to rorve �T ExisrM over pole I I 1 I I / / r" f j ! i e o. 9 /go Sure ConHd Paht 11 1 \ Detentkxt/ / i�ii00i jj ` t \ \ r tYorer LMe/gore vdw \\\\\\ ITrsotmsnt/'�/� // / //........ ,—` \`.,,.. \ `•. \P-\ •t•- 1 s.N %56T\ 9c EnWkq hywant • � \� \� �/'/ \ \ \ 1 ,..,.. `" { i - D Isthg tree /he Proposed h t \\\\\\ �/� �/ /// // 1 � ` `\ 4 ' \ /_'' s5 � o . 3 6 \ \. • , v -� t '•�'"�. rv-rv�-r`wrwr, Gearing hinds � Proposed cwrb et \ ! � \\'� \ / ////% �`'� •"C` \.\ : (' ;'�c �' �—t' — — 'c"'�"' £xisthg Sewn LMe/mmhds o Crncrels monument Proposal Sewer LMe/manhde p /rm pie ' _'1� gyp. \ `' —st--- —ar--0— £xislMg Storm LMe%arch bosh r Orasroge How ---S7-57-0— Proposed Storm Lxr%atch bosh 177,5 Fhmh grade spot e%rot/on `•.... I �: Ill // ' `.q.-.. � ,,�/ ,i' \ x3'S3.% \\ \ �\ �\ ) \` \� 1p^�Y. ,V 4''�••• i —u0 m— proposed underd aM -P sib, ''`' �3��� ExarngConfour a ughrvosr Proposed Contour I , .� {,! Nolbob erosk» cartro/ Proposed pad roads/Pakhg 1t •IVcy . -..., �I11 IIl S� ^\ \ \ II I 8_P3\e3X3 \ y o - � / � � �. ` `—� .':..... �Poi . ame' .rot r1,f1k f i ,J/ s tereosion — — — —_ �\ Prpoed slaw /b e path --------- con rr d PUD setback fm z r l � Noted y I rr t —o' N � � > \®� y /e f 1. The location and moterioh of existh utdiues is not waranted �, ry % g $ nj3 j r y .-a`o -d q to be exact or complete. The Contractor shill Held locate dt uti'ities and be sde/y responsible for d/ exi,&g .1,71ties and ! � `\� -"/ ;r^ '�`,r their unintemrpted sawThe e Contractor sho// contact Dig 01 Safe beforo commencing any work. I O t• 1 I I \} _ J'\ �\ N o� e '7 Z. Ihts plm is no way a boundary survey ` S .f•_ l .11 +III 'f'��_ \-___\ � � Cab F� \ --as.� I j 1 I \ I \\ �'a\; /.`/ / /, / F �,• i t�+� n, 4 ,. ,tf�b' ; 1 - •_. ,� I I I I I I + ?fir '- - - \ \ _ _ � ^ \ � / / ,. / \\ 1 I � \ , , ,. r i .�`' -� ✓ / 'C' � \ r "T /r' fi3' 5 �.. t f_•` '° ;✓/ \' a• .w' ao' 1 91 t 6'0/ 1 1'\1' ! / 1'II III 4 \\ nPaCK r I// /// ! ii,l t ' ,.--\\�\\ 336� \\,\\\ / t ►r -! %^..,,•.,i...tlS`Irl FF .y „/i' \,/ III I I i5� \ \ 4 r• r\` \, �\.,., t s�f f •y1 i ✓ '~ ®'/ i BAR SCALE 74 it I �1 III �'__ ' � \\�\ ._\ \\ _ / .- �,' -ct 7 N �4 � 1" � �.,_ �- �;••_/ _•...�-"- 1 I \ I I I r W-11 \i\Dees mrd os.,�vud, eneated Dan v. ' ,) ./ N _.....- Drawn fM.I,/�P/SNH g Erosion G'rodin & Contra/ Plan Lancaster Lone ` �\ \ �-� ` I \.. _— _ / _f _.. .,. -• �` __ Checked O1� e __ Scale 1"- 3o rien Home Farm Date uy t 1 t ,„f�• 1J 1 I I I t I I 2•tt \\\ \\ \ sgY yam. ��y �r1 "� oject DO1B2 a1 South BUNM ton ✓ennont \ \ i FOR PERMIT REVIEW Pr �s ep LfNSINt;FConsecltarz ff' sneers, Ina. 6 INDEX - Sheet I Preliminary Plat Sheet 2 Overall Plan Sheet 3 Utility Plan - Stonington Circle Sheet 4 Grading & Erosion Control Plan - Stonington Circle Sheet 5 Utility Plan - Lancaster Lane Sheet 6 Grading & Erosion Control Plan - Lancaster Lane Sheet 7 Road & Utility Profile Sheet B Road & Utility Profile Sheet 9 Road & Utility Profile Sheet 10 Road & Utility Profile Sheet 11 Road Details Sheet 12 Details Sheet 13 Sewer / Water Details Sheet LI Sheet 14 Details Sheet L2 Sheet 15 Details Sheet L3 Landscape & Lighting Plan Landscape & Lighting Plan Landscape Details BAR SCALE _ ,Yoo, NEI O BRIEN HOME FAR1! +� 2OOi OLD FARM ROAD SOUTHBURLINGTON, IRItgJ1 ,- r L'Y �� So. �1'�7Ptrrfn�. ARPRS & L9ASIAW Consulting Engineers, lne. 164 Afain Street, Colchester, Vermont 0,T"e Planning and Zzzhg /tlformotln t F Aad, po !} Asno�lc No rh 5' PReotry /// / \�� I \ \•�/ IB55 WA/ismn Rood P.O. Box 2184 ,yw1 /J 09riN/ BroMers '�-t � % .,,gq��i Sa Burlington, Y 1 05403 1wr.�Nd MJn� e Weltes/ey Wow C domLndvm \" Imt aoe /s�'.f \ \ Iarha QhbMt• •I� a� It•A/hton Rood i bb >R taa7 *A- si4 Pane J06 � Resw.nr m 7 Z hg a a� A%-.W 4 t4a4 Ceorgero n Hcmeownen �,%� Fox Po-ce/ 1260-00200 Ne 44! ee'r lox F-I a970-00255 7t f/ Total Arse - 69.7 acres g- r�0 (tip) 1 a{+"`�'\ J !�Fuo e°t NQ' way \ S40 w CPA Pa r e shu R / srameob �os -1 \1 ' i s J A ,.zz94 y j \ / o South eurtmgtan NI/h �oT aa.e g ene9Bli- MN 1 d' 6� /9-J=--+�i �'1 y`A / \ w\ ♦ $ / 10'.fee r9ryy \ � h.°a ��/d7• srmw.ar.r eo..,re+77.75 � •1 � \ \ �� \ \ \ f� / C"Y jaMmrax / �/ /d"' Rr m. Dm.Bt swN N7955'S5 .ASp, 9�in \ i / 1 Proposed Lot 1 eadaaro, [osco/o Area = 8.5 acres 'M .+{ a �� \ h^ / / Proposed Lot 2 per 1 1 tat ""' Location Proposed Lot 3 j / Area — 5.3 acres ?r0 p '^ 1 U 2.& \N. dw` Mq� >,� '� roam Pots 1I QU \ \ .s \ �\ !g 1 Areo = 0.25 acre S\ g, Bridge H.--- -s ` \ / ; \ to waf.m�r •�\� !� 1.l�Pa,, 42e \ Legend F.&x 2 ,981 \ b N,ymr N. \\ ,fo \ ♦ ({ �qry► Edstil9 P.-R.I.11 BunMr°' \ �v3' �p \\ ,.�..--,k yPe+D \ \ \ 77 Svrxy Conrro/ Pomt N0542'581F / zm{{ 1\\4\ \1 eo uarmm� P,.e�r '\ \\ �s�\ \s\ s\ \� -ymo` �. I tiJ�248p♦0./� '7 N_t2S5OB4.• ty 4'WProposed Lot 41 j4. o„eaiyTowPork tt 18\ \ {y{ `'�'' 39.39�W _/Iy^ \♦\ \ p£1 c0rxayiac6. ei-ro9lsyteentdlyNaoaeref ononree n. erMsonwarmecenti- rorbn 3 \ 3J3.671'}56 Areo=1.9 acres 4- \ \\ \ \ a fiisfdPlpq ewofou0nd0od r 774:!, o,11�2} O**" Famly L6nited Pffterat�?�l? VO/Une 420 Poge 345 -1 A?/he / \ 027979�' D Acres 49 255 A \\ ` Nam b 1 \ \ a wN De N of My Ne \ J2t ,a,w + 1 \ \ • /�e'd r Barn Buda9rorr Mop References { 1 \ FdMt Aar* Rsa'tY OWA `\\ \ a�`�'wa`r :,Jo,i. «;are PN.a i o[ aar a,t«+roiir-dr Fieeerick ✓ .k. 4 { 1 �� alums It? Page 8 ` Mory Maher 1 10 August ?4, 197` \ \ \ \ Z Fn L BovrosaMRla Prgoe-fy' Dr r/bgnh,ck-L/ewvn / 1Mw,re 9/ P 3!9 ` 1 Re aim i7 Lands 1 415 Aarse \ Pro r x Orowaq D-1- parse OeloDr l94j Rsmse Argrer M areas 1 9 \ a xal aor�es, \ 01iD'Aen Foully L.inited POrtnersdt{o \ \\ \ 905a s l 1. o, n ✓oa mai9o+, Bs , go, r Area = 159 ones Rerrlotnhg Lf7nds \ ♦\ \ FOrest Park Realty Corp. ST0374B E 1 Areo 34.5 acres \ F 50gi6.45 1 1 \\em\ \ \ �d 137.60' --'� ' NOS:TY39 D�& 1Zj00' 1 1 ` rareRejwI o at 1 bar aoe. I L2* \ \ + 1 Deed References \ I \ JBt ehr� Stevwr e< I C8,W R ` 1 \ a \\\ \ \ I Annie apovy car coca \ ✓aldnan Hoprood 1 LYantor_ GYontee wr..e .av I tbr.e. t7s I { 1 D—W a OV w a Leo OVMn ro oa wr Fo ffy Lh~ Rm*wa* 420/Jai o ae,,bw JT,, 1997 \ N ectrrr q 40' r'r Ba! Aye .% Ir5/%om & dlodo { i 1 AMW [ teas I Aryl raft I t�drer \ - ---- oaw, .aoar. ro Fa.er ROR Rory r4z/4a7 A, t 2[ 1978 \ \ ver.r.. reo Ay 4sr 1 ; -- oaf.. B-1 ,Ja/145 Aepuf 4 /afa 0877:34 11' / oa Re ba} P R�r OR- rb,Mre Js/,n uor�ner sE 1977 76 u 275. 00' \ \I E.roee er L.a oafs ro L.o a 09;n r: e.,e tb.,w ✓ oan.r 4B/45 Lr� r4 196e \\ \ N\ \ r \ \ { 1 1 RP. ober! Ryan m \ \ \ K M /9a Pop 29 ro{�, \ Burr/;ngton H;ghw 1's &Roods \ eFl a .� AblonOe- I[ glaJ g + $ fl\1 wr... 1 ' ae Fo�2Roae hy - - - Kennough - Donis/ ✓ Leo - - 0578"45" _ _ 5067T10'w a.c+(4v1 7$1 _ -1 R- N Ia7b7_'M'E 901 ��- 608 - - ' PIA w 2 S087934'la e' y _ Donis/ ✓ � s e e o �''°• — --�1-- _ _.a ,_�. f LYd Fam Road 1 k 1 _ i ... ✓co. nl' - ' I d" .1. ,.r. I Jn 9a' Risk I OBiren r_ .___ _ str• L. - �.r-�-r I Donre/ ✓ &Leo ✓ .t Doniel J. s: Leo ✓ Jr. OBrien N 1ej1'y.E Y B o M ` I I O Brien I a,.,, ?/e pl • / McSonk is _ / Bonk Boundary Notes "" 200 Jetl �' M' 1 Ilre ewcrw,. y,/ mew was as me I--. a,orW oe 4. Anr eaxeoy errerm:wrwr. ao.ad a, dwe a a,..n«rr. s »a errenr or are .mer or W.aw Pow+ d orne- ! e er q m Me e,ne .erc p,aW o d o dyrW re Pr,•+de amm B Nre e - .,a o n nov. aer ias,MSM Q°r' nieie f're'r aMa.s cote R,a Dau dory na.r ,n&WOM of me Mgh,l threw of Me c »ree to the oawr Fomly rAnRW PalnMjo one r r mere era..,. ro rnor .xrenL m.w Par:./ J. m% D. BOr Sccle Y - ,m' /A✓/RCK sera oa i, nnmmr .+m erisrs,9 Pnyrrd mor.m,.�mr a,. Pa r Reofry C -ohon ,, rn,. a- web . ar Ne aa.� .�,�r ra y er..rrfA.d �a;,re a rghre Ae.,�afane a S°�e ed Pre/imin ary a��/ en.. co eaa eer.ee, Pny,au .wwn,e a e .Haan eW.ree F !y Li lw Po-mersh6 awe F r Pot R a(r c Po-etwr .v. ,o+.cMo. one r aw dr rna Par o/ : x are smsraerw aces oOA obcu -fs sncwe be e.enrrW omn a. M-ted, , weWt to Me a y as legd'ry o/ This surrey is Dosed an physFro/ evidence Drown FAfP/SNFJ to e'mnolr my r of Ifra a cmMcf. Mow seed. o -1. 1. eh- t- aFee - doc -. oro 7. hair "bi - -H y o/ .w,rwv b b Me xW usr of O'NW- FO y L ,W /pond fn the rwd Ond /tten evdence ewa.eW ,s , er of aw -fn enm or P Msslrio oM Ft Pat Redty Coyaorfos and alas uw by a6sfrocled fr- dead and other R-t--t Checked 2 uwonerr. Hare e n sea n one - Me arawrd wnee shown om a act a ,wrroa a ore - upon records. This survey is censfstent Wth thot ~ m me par o/ sv y .Here" it Me opi,xn of Me > if canal./ s of /pr, Mnr Me HWcorW DdxWwies may mr De eNdenGY. A& Plot C-fOrlrls to 27 V..�A. £ $COIF 1'- 100,O Brien Home Farm was rroeoW to gnaw o Pwnr /al otnewee merumerrW wh'd. B A9 0l Me a[s hWeW in this y oe sv.. ro me A rnw'rwrs errs rw.r.ara..-&cf.W Dr me Score of w..narr section 1l03 Ns O.K Dote .' L 2[tl/ 1 till � J w. D,ar& aremNorw, ore Dove 1,e snf oe d s Any eyaran ,r. me Par. of y or Da,,,,eoy r e. Lw,e u P,rmR(.) b Pred crap Pony (Ro. 4cgs4e a,a ! �s J urD,:,r m Ne r o,d f p'ry w /, ' 1, wffi�dy1-1 of or omen srru,eP exotr..:. of hwoeoy ore. a• oaen, m„e o ne,n) �j /� -Y gars > grmfw .M10 MohswO Me nghf of �Yy ro F ✓y LarRW PmrneYre and F (Pat R.aly Co.Pworan fa J�- Pro t 00182 aw.ey r w w co a.nn Prroarr o' rgnrs n omcrW .w-e arorW or roe eansny Q e eND s e Ad Fwm Rood South Burhn tan ✓ mt �tlGD` " BS & ",VSlNG Consulting engineers. Inc. - /a, A. ✓-*— L.LS /BJ9 /64r AFam Street Cotchweter, Vermont OS•f46 ___...........r" C �% \ Roprox/mote /acetbn "' \ { �"�` \. / on tm9 e' se•w - fir / „b. f "•. .rf \,^ yi 70 / \ ` 'b mthg Aapfe / flag f V .P \ r earBthg 6 qs�� / j' I / rMh• Planning and Zoning /nfoematlan OAgen Owner/Aoafkront Agency, Ina /j - / VMnn• 198 Pogo J71 Wellesley Grove Ccvidaminium - \ \ 1555 Forest 1Wftt- Rood / Mo 16, 19e3 ✓flume 214 PogB Y Norotdber d 1 Georgetown Homeowners \ Dr1w to be with Kennedy / ge _ DMr it be designed by P.O. Box 2184 \ / / Asrociotlon ' So. Budktgtar, t'ennont 05403 \ Mc�orYmd-Johnson / \\ Zmmg La'ltrkt Wm dmg Brook Zoning / \ -' ,(ttvJ Tax Pace✓ 0970-00?55 o/ -*1hg 12' A.G / \ \ ,• 1 - BB too', _ Poo-- Approdimre rocatron �ofVfhng le A.F - At*=- Total A— = M..7 acres \ CPA PortnershQ t _ \ \ \ / s� •.\Y'rve D\ Lot 1 t J\ \ f /_ascdo 15 Units/L.d C / \\\\ Type III \ �/ t0Lmcustr Lme F ';� Wndri, Romeo— j I Association vok.mB 17-1 PogB 42e \ C / Lot .3 N / \ Febiv y 2 1981 - 1 _ \ \ \ 'MP Lot 4 Vyy 1 r O Brien Family Lim/teal Parteertershlp \ to/ume 420 Poae �45 /� � �,, \\V�_J / December J7, 1997 \ \ 255 Acres ,l�� v \ ~\ e•neaew �w \ \ � � \ \ �p � `� 6•n•A4w Forest Pork Realty Corp. C'clume 142 Poge 497 may Moher 41 1 August 24, 7978 K-j— 91 P.O, im \ Ramah747g Lands i. 4.5 Acres A.9 t26; 1959 `-i°•1 OBrien Family Limited Partnership \ \ Area = 75.9 acres Rema/;Ihg Lands \ \ ` Forest Park Realty Corp. \ 1 II Area = 34.5 acres F �dBb \1 1 * �,• ✓Btxne /es 4" ' - --•_- Rem/blwWe/7Z-Inng--�---1 , son Sondra f {1 1 1 I Rendal/ Ron 7 R4NoMl/al ZBM 1 p vdums J56 I I � R..v..:irm4 1993 ».., I Steven & Gardner & I 1 \ Annie II BeveHy I 1 ✓cVdmm I I Hopwood volume J60 I Vdume 175 564 �4 1995 M & mele Au I „y � I Weiner I r - _ __ _ __-__�__- b r I �/fi \ _l I A,Ws( >liB26J' Sus( I Robert P. I 199 Poge 29 ` \ I" BuNhgton Highwam & ROads •..•. --------------- 5 November 14, Vag E 1 1 ✓ t— 1 Poge 1 a* Old am o0 -- ------------------ ---------- a 4r WS £xLstMro Lot (Afoot &Wosetd Lot I22wreoeo N-&-dl'Op- FMd Lot Cowe'ogatt For O®Yen Nome Form Praooard RwNdwntW t47&p Let 1 (Gs-W Lot rnhwxs - 45 WI,P-Ayng/1Poode - N,,7m eL 14.&T SABww &1bRWvtn- J,070 s.r. oar L•t 2 fiu& gQ- 64J91 sL 16.Ji I,W Z4 !!Y - 46 Wte Tara Coverage- AM F 1 -Y Co -age to.2X Lot 2 A.Y wn-) Porkhp/Roodl- JS, 0181 At 1SLT S+oMdk/8.t'iodr- 40la s/. 2&9 Busohpr J9,6Ctl al t7. tag 6a1Wew- 9" s.L Alf Total 590" Front /SGf AUB ROI R.-. O'S" s.f 52M 8*4-th- /4.149 c/ 121X 7oto/ Co , 64. 9X \ Let J fwe (am amyl S/de-olx- MP s.f. .I4X \ Let 4 rr t rya -W \ Nate \ SOAVIry Lane \ \ \ 4W \ \ \ \\ \ ahtwey / / --"-- R� ..,,-..,,,v.,.,.,�,snmBcA" lt1Pl J Rov -. - - e P \ 0mie/ L SanaFo - _ _ LYd Form Road / ' O1%rian Panel ✓. & Leo J.- Daniel J & Leo J. ..t: eommercral 1 z ng ` Leo • A4erNtonfs rr Omen 1 Residsatio/ 4 Zariog Donie/ ✓. &J. Jr. ORKen " / ReswenfkL 4 Zmhp 1 / So7k I rl Leoend •n, Existing power pale Det, rem Oescrptkrr CrieaYed Dote _i I2 ,WNe.v Control Point Design me £xisth g hj,&wt O vera/! Pan A Calculated caner. Manual-tat/on Notes: Drawn to be $et of owner's d/rectlon. 1. The location and matirials of existing utfties is not worronted Checked s Non Piffle found to be exact or complete. The Contractor shall Asid locate of/ Scole 1'- 100' J 0' 50' 100' 700 300" 4oa' 500 - - P pert, have uti71ties and be solely reapons/ble for all exrrfinq utilities and O Brien Home Farm thek uninterrupted services. fie Contractor shall contact Dig Date Mar L 2001 ,....,...�..,.. Existng wood line $ofe before canmencing my work. Hw/ond setback Project 00182 OWForm Rood South BuHin ton van,, nt Bar .Sccle 2. ma plm is m no way, o boandory sur.ey XR�9S r@ I4,YSMY 1onsu.' inq Engineers, Inc. FOR PERMIT RE\AE�R( .�.... 2 ............................. 1G4 Vain Street, CalolLester, Vermont 9S4A6 w No Text rap .�- disperso/ pod �- Georgetown ——,tifotch Line , � • --,-� New End Section -, - /n v 321j laoll II New CB -I pry e i ICew CB Rim J26.7 Inv J22.5- New CB Rim 324.4 Inv. 321.2- New 0ut/et l -.' / structure eve CB 1GV)nwoter / Rim 324.4 f Detention/ / /nv. 321. f� Treatment / / Bosin� / New End / Section r Inv 319.51 - Ne vo/ve /tip rop - / disperse pod - ring f eW t The lntersectlon of the proposed rood wuases. RIn 72141 New sitn Kennedy &ive is S1rox" fa- 17h.,strotiW purposes /n v. n J15. b's /nv out 3J5s1 Rim 321.25 Actud br teSBCt%rr designwN/ be b oth. y er /nIn,.in J16. 14 Inv. out J16.04 r e PYC SOr u nBd M gaR's '�' DiYve Tap existing water service All Ceorgetown e- r ar of\� 9hf t r New Wh n �/y Rim .4235 1, v. in 31B. 12 Exlsnng 18' QW /n v. out J1602 In,. JIAM - New ;34 holdreint , *Rip got Match Line I rop dispe sal Pod -I APp ca: Property Line -I+`- - B6-w- ExJsf/ng Water Une/pate w/ro _i12 -W-- - 4W- Proposed Hot, Line/gate m/ue i21.6 ! ;t4 f f ' fVVY I Existing tree //ne or/n 6 C/eg //mils y �/.... ' -� - - -s-6T- £x/st/ng Sewer Line/monhcJe ❑ [ 29• r �aAe \ {.' >v ` +.1 y r Proposed Sewer Llne/monho/e p Ga �' £xlst/ng Storm Line%otch basin r \, t Proposed Storm L/ne%otch basin ssTxS -uauo- Proposed underdrom r7 yFf. ` Ex/stmp Contour 4 { --- Proposed Contour 19.B. t� Al- Q9 r i {t1 ra0.ot Rim 32d 65 I -... St •.../ Proposed paved roods/porkh g Inv J24.55 1 f } l� Proposed sidewdk/b&e path a sz wee: � - - - - - I • . ,.% r PUD setback New SJfh Rnn 331.25 /nv in J22.: .11 IV -New sewer • , / Weano -172 r I r I r I � I A/n fec. Exfstmg Power pole Survey Cmtrol Point Existing hydrant Proposed hya' mt P oposed -h stop Concrete monument /ran p/pe Dro/noge Aow fin/sh grode spot etevot/on S✓,rn Light post 1. fie focot/on and motenofs of existing ufililies is not warranted to be exact or complete. the Contractor sho/f field /ocote o/1 mMlt/es and be safely responsb/e for o// existlng utlhtes and thee• uninterrupted serv/ces. The Contractor shut/ contact Dig Safe before commencing any wok. 2. Ws plan is m no way a boundoy survey. /J- FOR PERMIT REVIEW ea' BAR SCALE r - Jo• `A rAN, 7 <vo/ ArrowWood Environmental 950 Bert White Road Huntington,Vermont 05462 (802) 434-7012 Ms. Carol Barnard 630 Hinesburg Rd. So. Burlington, VT 05403 July 3, 2001 Dear Carol: The purpose of this letter report is to: 1. Summarize the results of the assessment for wetlands and natural communities on the property proposed for development by the O'Brien Family Limited Partnership; and 2. Recommend changes to the proposed project that will result in sufficient protection of significant natural resources. Introduction Residents of Wellesley Grove retained ArrowWood Environmental to conduct a review of wetlands and natural communities on an approximately 20-acre parcel proposed for development by the O'Brien Family Limited Partnership (OFLP) off Hinesburg Road in South Burlington, Vermont. Dori Barton of ArrowWood Environmental conducted the field assessment on June 6 and June 29, 2001. In addition to the field investigation, a review of National Wetland Inventory Maps, SCS Soil Survey Maps, significant natural community's inventories, and State of Vermont Impaired Surfaces Waters listings were also consulted. The results of the complete assessment are presented below. Wetland Delineation Review Located within the subject parcel are two forested wetland drainages, which the developer describes as two Class III wetlands. The wetlands were delineated by Errol Briggs from William D. Countryman Company in the fall of 2000. The designation of Class III wetland signifies that the Army Corps of Engineers and the District Environmental Commission (Act 250) have jurisdiction over activities �i involving development in and near the two wetlands on the property. It has yet to be determined whether the wetland delineation was reviewed or approved by Ms. Carol Barnard July 3, 2001 the Army Corps of Engineers. The wetland delineation was reviewed for accuracy on June 6, 2001. The wetland delineation flagging placed by Errol Briggs was still clearly visible during the June 6, 2001 site visit. With the possible exception of two areas, the delineation was found to be an accurate determination of the wetland boundaries. The delineation of the northern extent of the wetland labeled as Wetland A on the site plan appeared to discount approximately 50' of wetland. While it is possible that the delineation flags for the northern extent of the delineation were removed and not visible during the June 6, 2001 site visit, it is also possible that the delineation may need to be adjusted to include an additional 50'. Given the proximity of this wetland to the proposed development, additional review of this area is recommended. A second wetland area (small finger) on the northwestern boundary of the wetland labeled as Wetland B does not appear to have been included in the overall delineation. This area is on the western side of the wetland complex and is not proximal to the proposed development. No further review is recommended for this area. Wetland Characteristics The wetlands on the subject property are characterized as forested palustrine wetlands. Descriptions of dominant vegetation, soils and buffer characteristics are given below. Description of dominant vegetation: The wetlands are characterized as wet drainages meandering through forest. The wet drainages are dominated by spotted -touch-me-not (Impatiens capensis) and sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis). The upslope boundary of the wetlands are generally characterized by eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) and red maple (Acer rubrum) mature growth trees. The drainages are gently sloping through the subject property with many areas with standing water at the time of evaluation. Found within the drainages are many fallen trees providing potential habitat for small mammals. Description of Soils: The SCS soil survey for Chittenden County identifies the wetland areas on the property within the Enosburg and Whately soil series, which are characterized by, level to slight slopes, deep, poorly drained loamy sands. The wetland buffer zone and surrounding upland is characterized by the Adams and Windsor soil series and Duane and Deerfield soil series. These series are characterized by deep, loose, moderately well drained to excessively drained soils that are sandy throughout. Ms. Carol Barnard July 3, 2001 Description of the buffer zone: The buffer zone is generally characterized by the Oak -Pine -Northern Hardwood Forest Formation (described in detail below). The dominant vegetation in the wetland buffer is white pine (Pinus strobus), eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), and red maple (Acer rubrum). Natural Community Characterization The subject property is characterized by an Oak -Pine -Northern Hardwood Forest Formation (as described by Thompson and Sorenson, Wetland, Woodland, Wildland, 2000). The Oak -Pine -Northern Hardwood Forest Formation is considered a Transitional Hardwood Forest. Oaks, hickories, and pines mix in this formation with the ubiquitous northern hardwood species such as sugar maple, red maple, yellow birch, and beech. These forests are found in the warmer climate areas of Vermont, such as the Champlain Valley. The forest on the subject property is characterized by white pine, eastern hemlock, red maple, grey birch and red oak in the overstory, witch hazel, hickory, and shadbush in the understory and star flower, Canada mayflower, partridge berry, cinnamon fern and bracken fern in the herbaceous layer. Both the white pine and red oak do best in well -drained soils where the climate is more temperate, such as the Champlain Valley. Soils in these forest formations are well -drained to excessively well -drained. There are no known undisturbed examples of this forest type, but historical information suggests that mature forests will have white pine, red oak, black oak, red maple, and hemlocks as common members of the canopy. The shrub layer is a mixture of tall shrubs like witch hazel and smooth shadbush. Herbs are sparse, and overall plant diversity is low. Animals of this community have not been well studied, but mammals commonly seen include white-tailed deer, gray squirrel, and eastern chipmunk. Downstream Waterbodies Wetland drainages originating on the subject property are culverted under Kennedy drive and meander as streams/wet drainages to emergent marsh wetland complexes associated with Potash Brook approximately 1200 ft to the west. Potash Brook then flows into Lake Champlain, approximately 3 miles to the west. In accordance with Section 303(d) of the Federal Clean Water Act, the State of Vermont has identified and reported to the New England Regional Office of the r Ms. Carol Barnard July 3, 2001 US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) impaired surface waters in the State of Vermont. Listings are substantiated by data collected through water quality monitoring efforts. The first Impaired Waters listing was created in 1996 and revised in 1998 and 2000. For all listings, Potash Brook is identified as impaired water for the segment extending from the mouth at Lake Champlain to 5 miles upstream. The pollutants identified include a suite of urban pollutants including sediments, pathogens, metals, and nutrients. The uses listed as impaired include aquatic life support and contact recreation (swimming). Problems creating the impairments include non -point sources such as urban runoff, land development, and erosion. The current status for this section of the Brook is characterized by limited improvement since 1988, poor biological condition (1990-1993&1998 water quality monitoring results), and habitat degradation. Wetland Functions and Values Assessment The two wetland drainages on the subject property are not shown on the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps but are hydrologically connected to a larger wetland complex located to the west along Potash Brook. The two wetlands are not considered contiguous to the westerly Class II complex, and therefore are classified as Class III wetlands. A functions and values assessment was conducted and found that the Class III wetlands are likely significant for six of the wetland functions and values outlined in the Vermont Wetland Rules (See attached Vermont Wetland Evaluation Form for details). These functions are listed below: • Water Storage for Flood Water and Storm Runoff.- The wetlands are significant for water storage for floodwater and stormwater runoff due to their physical space for expansion during flood events. • Surface and Groundwater Protection: The wetlands are significant for surface and groundwater protection due to the wetlands' potential for retaining nutrients and pollutants and trapping sediments, their relatively level to low gradient topography, and location relative to potential upgradient pollution sources and downgradient water bodies (Potash Brook and Lake Champlain). • Wildlife and Migratory Bird Habitat: The wetlands and surrounding uplands have habitat characteristics known to support the reproduction of Jefferson salamander, blue -spotted salamander, yellow -spotted salamander and /or other uncommon amphibians. The presence of these species has not been studied or documented on the property at this time. 4 Ms. Carol Barnard July 3, 2001 • Recreational Value and Economic Benefits. The wetland, wetland buffer zone and upland forest are used recreationally by area residents. Trails are utilized for walking through and observing the wetland. • Open Space and Aesthetics: While the wetland is not readily visible to the public, it as well as the surrounding forest have special aesthetic qualities enjoyed and valued by area residents. • Erosion Control Through Binding and Stabilizing the Soil. The wetlands are significant for erosion control through binding and stabilizing the soil along the small streams that run westerly to Potash Brook. Project Evaluation and Recommendations The site plans presented by the developer indicate that a 50' buffer has been afforded to each of the Class III wetland drainages on the property. This is the same width required for Class II wetlands under the Vermont Wetland Rules and a width commonly required for Class III wetlands through Act 250 and local zoning regulations. Fifty feet is a minimum buffer width ecologist suggest for the protection of ( significant wetland resources. When considering the significance of the wetlands on the subject property and the source and degree of impairment to downstream water bodies (Potash Brook and Lake Champlain), consideration of a wider buffer is appropriate. To afford maximum protection to the immediate wetland resource and the downstream waterbodies, a 100' buffer width is recommended for the wetland buffer zone associated with the wetlands on the subject property. While the developer has created a buffer zone (proposed 50`), many of the proposed structures directly abut the buffer. Given that the proposed development is residential in nature, it is reasonable to assume that a certain area surrounding the structures will be used for residential purposes (lawn, play structures, decks, swimming pools, etc). For this reason, a building envelope including the residential structure and a 25' yard area about the structure should be incorporated into the site layout plans. A buffer zone (recommended 100') can only afford protection to the wetland resource if it is maintained in a native state, the proposed layout will most assuredly result in encroachments into the buffer for residential activities inherently associated with a residential environment. In addition, the edge of the wetland buffer should be clearly marked with a fence or planting hedge to demarcate the extent of residential use and to prevent encroachment. 5 Ms. Carol Barnard July 3, 2001 Summary In summary, an assessment of the wetlands on the property resulted in questions about the accuracy of the wetland delineation in two locations, only one of which has direct bearing on the proposed project. It is recommended that the northern extent of the wetland delineation for Wetland A be reevaluated and that the entire delineation be reviewed and approved by the Army Corps of Engineers. Secondly, the applicant provides a 50' wetland buffer zone for each of the Class III wetland drainages on the property. Evaluation of significant functions and values of the wetland resources and vulnerability of downstream water bodies resulted in the recommendation of a 100' buffer zone for the wetlands on the subject property. In addition it is recommended that the proposed buildings be set back a minimum of an additional 25' from the wetland buffer to include a reasonable yard area outside of the wetland buffer zone. It is my opinion that implementation of the suggested recommendations will result in adequate protection of the wetland resources on the property and important water resources downstream from the property. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions about the information presented. Sincerely, Dori Barton Wetland Ecologist O'Brien Development Project, S. Burlington, VT n/ Wetland A Wetland B National Wetland Inventory Roads Surface Waters 300 0 300 600 Feet ArrowWgod Environmental rip„rr A. Waters appearing below have documentation and data indicating impairment and do not meet VT Water Quality Standards. Reciuired or needed pollution controls have yet to be fully implemented. Further pollutant loading determinations (e.g. a TMDL) are necessary - unless remediation will be completed prior to the scheduled TMDL. On Remediation TMDL Waterbody Segment Name/ Use(s) Surface Water Current Status/ 1996 Completion Completion ID Description Pollutant(s) Impaired Quality Problem(s) Situation List Year I Lead Year I State Lead VT05-1 1 MUNROE BROOK UNDEFINED- ALS URBAN RUNOFF, EROSION, POOR BIOLOGICAL CONDITION No 2009 DEC-WQ TYPICAL (SED, LAND DEVELOPMENT (91); HABITAT DEGRADATION; NUTRIENT, ONGOING BIOLOGICAL METAL, PATH); MONITORING UNKNWN TOX'Y POTASH BROOK, SED'MT, ALS, CR URBAN RUNOFF, LAND LIMITED IMPROVEMENT SINCE Yes 2009 DEC-WQ FROM MOUTH TO 5 PATHOGENS; DEVELOPMENT, EROSION; 1988; POOR BIOLOGICAL MILES UPSTREAM UNDEFINED- FREQUENT BEACH CONDITION (90-93 & 98); TYPICAL CLOSURES (RED ROCKS) HABITAT DEGRADATION (METALS, NUTRIENTS, TOX VT05-1 I L01 SHELBURNE BAY - PHOSPHORUS AES, CR P ENRICHMENT ANALYSIS & MODEL'G DONE; Yes 2016 1999 DEC - WQ LAKE CHAMPLAIN AD) TARGET P LOAD 13.0 MT/YR (Shelburne) SHELBURNE BAY - MERCURY FC ELEVATED LEVELS OF LAKEWIDE Yes 2008 DEC- AP/WQ LAKE CHAMPLAIN MERCURY IN WALLEYE HEALTH/CONSUMPTION (Shelburne) ADVISORY IN EFFECT; ONGOING FISH CONTAM'T MONITOR'G SHELBURNE BAY - PCBs FC ELEVATED LEVELS OF PCBs LAKEWIDE Yes 2008 DEC- AP/WQ LAKE CHAMPLAIN IN LAKE TROUT HEALTH/CONSUMPTION (Shelburne) ADVISORY IN EFFECT; ON- GOING FISH CONTAM'T MONITOR'G VT05.12 UNNAMED TRIB PATHOGENS CR SOURCE(S) UNKNOWN, PREVIOUS ASSESSMENTS No 2003 DEC-WQ DRAIN'G TO PERIODIC BEACH CLOSURES REGARDING SOURCE(S) SHELBURNE TOWN INCONCLUSIVE BEACH (APPROX 1 MILE) VT06-01 MISSISQUOI RIVER, MERCURY FC ELEVATED LEVELS OF Hg IN CONSUMPTION ADVISORY IN No 2008 DEC-AP/WQ MOUTH UPSTRM TO WALLEYE EFFECT; FISH TISSUE DATA SWANTON DAM COLLECTION POINT AT MOUTH (APPROX 8 MILES) ,. ,-- ....amtte��.s•c:�ax: raws�.:erarv^.:a7.;--miawc�nrse-:=.•••n;.:.ar�an^a.:.�smcs�n-r.:a^�+x�i:av,cr.+»t�xst�ar-�vsr�vaemara-:rrseearxsvnaresa,x:en+zescs:a•rrrr�r:arrwnrna+-crr...m:aa.esnnr�rr.+�-:sue••. �va��rn�:-ran�a +rr!erkT.+E Note: Vermont currently has in effect a fish consumption advisory for all waters due to the presence of elevated Mercury (Hg) levels in fish tissue, therefore, all waters are listed and included in Part A by reference due to this contamination problem. A Mercury -based TMDL for fish contamination is not planned before 2008. Friday, December 11, 1998 Page 11 oj23 VERMONT WETLAND EVALUATION FORM Project Name: p` C"" !, Project # : Date: (010910 l Investigator: _D 0,; 0-'-* SUMMARY OF FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION 1. Water Storage for Flood Water and Storm Runoff ✓ 2. Surface and Ground Water Protection (10 3. Fisheries Habitat 4. Wildlife and Migratory Bird Habitat ()D 5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Habitat ` n O 6. Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat a0 7. Education and Research in Natural Sciences 8. Recreational Value and Economic Benefits 9. Open Space and Aesthetics ✓ 10. Erosion Control Through Binding and Stabilizing the Soil l 1. Water Storage for Flood Water and Storm Runoff The wetland is not significant if a, b or c apply: nod Known a. Wetland surface area is less than 1% of watershed. area of wetland x 100 = x 100 = % watershed area n10 b. Wetland is contiguous to a major lake or pond that provides storage benefits independently of the wetland. �oKe C_►�.��1�.`� ''� 3�,,.� S �", i�„ _` no c. The wetland's storage capacity is created primarily by beaver dams or other temporary structures. d. Are any of the following conditions present downstream of the wetland, but upstream of a major lake or pond, that could be impacted by a loss or reduction of the water storage function: NeS Developed public or private property; e Stream banks susceptible to scouring and erosion; , I 1JrG� Important habitat for aquatic life. VokCAS`n A' .If so, the wetland is significant if any of the following conditions are met: �,/e S e. Constricted outlet or no outlet and an unconstricted inlet; Cor,st,,-mac ttd o�,'}.ko T" (- CIA IvC11e d ) 2 S f. Physical space for floodwater expansion and dense, persistent, emergent vegetation or dense woody vegetation that slows down flood waters during peak flows and facilitates water removal by evaporation and transpiration; P�,,S"(a sP;, (-)o g. If a stream is present, its course is sinuous and there is sufficient woody vegetation to intercept surface flows in the portion of the wetland that floods; nc,l �na�ln h. Ratings of High or Moderate for Floodflow Alteration Effectiveness and Opportunity using the Wetland Evaluation Technique. Describe any characteristics of the watershed that may increase the volume of runoff reaching the wetland, such as large urbanized areas, relatively impervious soils or step slopes: `-VV-L- Du -" P",- , --I-'� , P., via- � �yo lv m" o 2. Surface and Ground Water Protection The wetland is significant if any of the following conditions are met: rO a. The wetland recharges a well head or aquifer protection area or a Class I or Class II ground water area; �12 S b. Reduces levels of contaminants in surface waters 7-- which recharge underlying or adjacent ground waters; nO c. Contributes to the flows of Class A surface waters; V,e-S d. Enhances or protects water quality through chemical action or by the removal of nutrients (3 of the following 6): I,o-5 constricted or no outlets; water sampling indicates removal of pollutants or nutrients; /yk fine mineral soils and alkalinity not low; no no dead forest or shrub areas, and no ditches or channels that confine water;��- _p O low water velocity through dense, erect vegetation; �; y hydroperiod permanently flooded or saturated. —�—� e. Enhances or protects water quality by the retention or removal of sediments or organic matter, or by moderating the adverse water quality effects of soil erosion or stormwater runoff; no artificial channelization of the wetland, no soil tillage and any one of the following: �5 constricted or no outlet; Hilt water sampling indicates retention of sediments or organic matter; direct evidence of accretion from photographs or soil coring; :)PS wetlands in depositional environments with fy— erect, persistent vegetation wider than 20 feet; .«S a�- w8kA6-- Goo" �I n"� fAO wetlands with persistent vegetation comprising a defined delta, island, bar or peninsula. 3 C�,a�►^ f. Ratings of High or Moderate for Sediment Retention or Nutrient Removal using the Wetland Evaluation Technique. Describe any land uses or characteristics of the watershed that may contribute point.or nonpoint sources of sediments, toxicants or nutrients to the wetland, such as: steep erodible slopes; row crops; dumps; areas of pesticide, herbicide or fertilizer application; feed lots; and septic systems. nXx Qse r- d+c_ u �"/k �o, r . �.e _ c. �� 'L P� • /VU ,FP�o, S-4, d, 3. Fisheries Habitat The wetland is significant if any of the following conditions are met: No a. Provides spawning, nursery, feeding or cover habitat for fish (documented or professionally judged); NO b. Documented spawning habitat for northern pike; 00 c. Contains woody vegetation that overhangs the banks of a stream or river and provides any of the following: shading that controls summer water temperature; cover including refuges created by overhanging branches or undercut banks; source of terrestrial insects as fish food; or streambank stability. d. Provides cold spring discharge that lowers the temperature of receiving waters and creates summer habitat for $almonid species. Comments: 4. Wildlife and Migratory Bird Habitat The wetland is significant if any of the following conditions are met: N O a. Habitat to support one or more breeding pairs or broods of waterfowl; NO b. Supports or has the resting, staging or roosting habitat to sunnor+- waterfowl migration; N�D_ c. Provides a nest site, a buffer for a nest site or feeding habitat for great blue heron, black -crowned night heron, green -backed heron or snowy egret; /Uu d. Supports or has the habitat to support one or more breeding pairs of any of the following species of birds: Virginia rail, sora rail, common moorhen (gallinule), American coot, snipe, horned grebe, marsh wren, Wilson's warbler, rusty blackbird, bay -breasted warbler, blue -gray gnatcatcher, black tern, Cape May warbler, Lincoln's sparrow, Tennessee warbler, American bittern, pied -billed grebe, least bittern, northern harrier, short -eared owl, black -backed woodpecker, three -toed woodpecker, spruce grouse, and Cerulean warbler; e. Contains evergreen trees and provides winter or necessary feeding habitat for white-tailed deer; /k�, f. Provides necessary feeding habitat for black bear or moose; AJO g. Contains evidence that it is used by muskrat, otter or mink; h. Supports an active beaver dam, one or more lodges, or evidence of us in two or more consecutive years by an adult beaver population; i. Provides habitat that supports the reproduction of Jefferson salamander, blue -spotted salamander, yellow -spotted salamander or other uncommon amphibians; )o j. Supports or has the habitat to support breeding populations of mountain dusky salamander, four -toed salamander, Fowler's toad or other species of similar significance; no k. Supports or has the habitat to support populations of any of the following reptile species: wood turtle, map turtle, stinkpot turtle or spotted turtle; tj O 1. Meets four or more of the following conditions indicative of wildlife habitat diversity: P_ 1. three or more wetland vegetation classes (greater than 1/2 acre) present (not including wet meadows); NO 2. the dominant vegetation class is marsh or swamp; 5 \0 3. located contiguous to a lake, pond, river or stream; No'r c"rAl 4. 50% or more surrounded by forest, agricultural land, old field or open land; ISO 5. emergent or woody vegetation occupies 26 to 75 percent of wetland, the rest is open water; and 6. one of the following; /Uo i. hydrologically connected to other wetlands of different dominant classes or open water within 1 mile; 13 ii. hydrologically connected to other wetlands of same dominant class within 1/2 mile; �J3_ iii. within 1/4 mile of other wetlands of different dominant classes or open water, but not hydrologically connected; a� m. Owned by state and federal government and managed as a wildlife area; and �JD n. Contains evidence that it is used by wetland dependent wildlife species. Comments: 5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Habitat The wetland is significant if any of the following conditions are met: NO a. Best known county example of one of the following: deep marsh dominated by rushes or cattails, shallow marsh, shrub swamp, wooded swamp dominated by hardwoods, cedars or spruce/fir/tamarack; b. Provides habitat for rare species of hydrophytic vegetation; )p c. Contains one or more plant species at their range limits; and F -�Q d. Contains disjunct plant species 40 miles or more from the nearest population. species or r communities of concern: ti}o („ Sla- c 6C- 6. Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat The wetland is significant if either of the following apply: /Ua a. Provides important habitat for any species on the federal or state threatened or endangered species list; _UO b. Documentation that threatened or endangered species have been present in past 10 years. Name of species and ranking: 1,)D U 5-h,. do C' I S 7. Education and Research in Natural Sciences ,The wetland is significant if any of the following apply: A)O a. Owned by or eased to a public entity dedicated to education or research; )D b. History of use for education or research, or scientific papers exist on the wetland; and _/U 0 c. Has one or more characteristics making it valuable for education or research. Comments: 8. Recreational Value and Economic Benefits The wetland is significant if any of the following apply: a. Used for or contributes to recreational activities; ,)p b. Provides economic benefits; .NO c. Provides important habitat for fish or wildlife which can be fished, hunted or trapped; and JC> d. Used for harvesting of wild foods. Comments: Ajt: ca 9. Open Space and Aesthetics The wetland is significant if any of the following apply: NO a. Can be readily observed by the public; e S b. Possesses special or unique aesthetic qualities as open space; and PD C. Has prominence as a distinct feature in the surrounding landscape. Comments: 10. Erosion Control through Binding and Stabilizing the Soil The wetland is significant if there are erosive forces present and any of the following characteristics are present: \.Q S a. Forested or shrub wetland adjacent to a lake, river or stream; ►�c c—x �'�r<�� t's(� " r13 b. Dense, erect vegetation greater than 20 feet wide; :f c. Wetland substrate exposed to erosive forces is rubble, cobble or gravel; 2 S d. Good interspersion of persistent emergent vegetation and water along course of stream flow; e. Studies show that wetlands of similar size, vegetation type, and hydrology are important for erosion control; Ratings of High or Moderate for Sediment Stabilization using the Wetland Evaluation Technique. What type of erosive forces are present: 5rr-OA i 1,.7 ,.�-• wc�'t._.� to P� k�f.;. P���. �'Y�a�..S tit. . 00 Lake fetch and waves: High current velocities: o Water level influenced by upstream impoundment: &-(L- im.91 .cow:, 6rny 337.yp _ = EFL Rio _LakcA51� _ - i � 1 itT kON � Front Elevation SCR�S 'fig x � Elevation j arage entrance) SCWS 1e w1 Rear Elevation 1,4E ,�9 , V 1, Right Side El 54ALe 'I3'= 1' ,v o 0 Lancaster Condo rn iniu S South Burlington, VT low 1'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. Sherman Greiner Halle' Ltd I Consulting . O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407 www.obdenbrothersagency.com 27 Warren Street Concord, NH 03301, (603) 225-0640 www.sghltd.com AVE _3Y�-337 REC�-,-�\jt:.v 4q-1: I z4_7n rn„rVn9tOn 2.1 1AZ Front Elevation ScC s 'I $ 'd I Elevation tLsarage entrance) Sc ors i�g_s ( Rear Elevation SCIA.- Iz — i, Right Side Elevation 60 Li;hCA-<<R LkAI`r AV6,-_pR C-M5JR!�tTr4N C-KA >E �31Lk.Ig AAA t3l i RUIN - !A&-LGHT`i5. ID Lancaster Condominiums South Burlington, VT tlwel W .—ft ,x O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. Sherman Greiner Halle' Ltd I Consulting P. O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407 www.obdenbrothersagency.com 27 Warren Street Concord, NH 03301, (603) 225-0640 www.sghltd.com *sear / \ W Or Brothers g\ ;, w,,n,e ray Pbq. sr. Wellesley Gra ve / eeAg Lwy /s, /98S Condominium Tob/e of Bearbrgs 07d QlstonC•S j Ike BAa-hg Not- eF' ys" ro RDINW N4310407' .78/9' ROkfW I. ROMPrJW 5000R376 E 1412' . TJW m RON1CM' 577777BT CondLm.Yi4/ne �� \\ / ✓on.ne 214 Pope 203 \ ` / No.m a f9 Georgetown Association, /nc. a r rxa Vol' . 2\ 4 ^ s eo o[Oya Z' �ire'0f% N f6 5� / N19 y 35 9 ��m ersper j �yrt thA �. Roe{iw 1M1' g e a'"� \ / Q,DO � e� \ � i (rP 2/ \�,1 � N p150 2• i -c'.. YB'W 7 '� � P \ CPA Portnership / lA / / PT1 �ro�'/ m • •• %ROK'TTw r - ROMCJM Rmr \\\ \ PLJg 1 T V ar 6h� '0� �/ a morwier \ e -�"•- EIS / �S 1 A ecrrspra, \� \ Stf NQSt7B 19T Ta6/e of tLrro Data for Curm 0 Pahf to Pohl C-- I -VA RaaRfs A+duded Anp4 RORP73W To ROMPCM M71- IM00' I571:76' Aa1•CJE Ts Rorrr,M< 7.7♦sar 17Qar Ai7!',xf' _.�/ynning_ and QninQ. /nf�tion_ - _0n7erL A Leant.' Ftrgt Po* ReNty a 0n*r Faf* LhrrYsd Pw-tnnshp Rood P.D. Rar T1Bd P.O. 218 Sa RudhQtal, Yemxvrl a54aV Lonfny 0/strlch._ -><. tea\ Resid-671 7 Zonig r- P-1 176a-00200 Tax Pw4,1 0970-00255 a� Areas: rotol Area - 66t5 ocrar da « t D1 South BurlingtonC�µgt%st \10 1a' ..or rtrrer \l / •... i060 P e sro,,,.orr .e..,,.rt__i// Lorx \ ¢s \ i V ` ■�y \ Kevnedy Drive _ \ Af toh Po ''0br tn. bwr nt or MrGfy SoutIQQv olne ro Mi0■7wcry ar saWu g9.f hi \ 34'w 'Lot 1 ��6�a.roe r&A ss Pope .69 A� t 1. 1964M, .O,rea « acres �.\ 10 �+ . \ \ \ V r,r. ss Pey..e7 A r ,R ,9s. 5, SBD%525' Ydums 7J PoAr to AL 2; 4 i __�., L01X / \ �Z \ Lb/ n. 7J'.9e 16 Auprrer 2Q ,919 toscdo �0 � / qq�-,/ t� Carr• ? s,Zgg � o \ �`� rw . 7J Page 17 Sq,fembr 4 1961 I l hry ty l /-bMvard mm Xi• T o \ \\ Su se U 9-s I ` MAY 14 2002 La19J O N Anx�2sAl A•M.raw Lot 2_ N71Y9Y1 E \ \ Cmdomhlums _ - _ --__ Area - 60 cares �+� \ Note: 1Lrs - r- 9oii 4r7 h 3 WMrdridge Homeowners - . � 6.x?8 o O. � \ J. .SYO Al- enf/ded Boundary Sur.sy, O@'Jen Hcme Form, 09rkn 4'• `fls• \ Vi O ^ 0 tare ASB175 P 42B ` aline 10, 2007, Prepared by K abs t Lansing Consu/tinQ EnQ Fond LA»ited iow&wshi and Forest Park R-It C 4'S7anlwater derenr e7` 1\ N N h •4' ` ` �fr. ume l7s P \ \ Y P y th?9 doled > 4r Me� ya■,•x a M. >�. ref .A s Off. ' LttN.r 18 ,9M \�� \ /nc. !cr comp/ete baundcry hfw-motron. Legend aBw*sJseaM sa u I o 3 h \ _- - QNr• TA w� 2 ,^ hh LorzN f .�� ExvtA7 wsr x7Aw hdrdsd �iy�:-7uoYu" o, y SOS 125B"W h� QPo Pd pO I A m 24. BO'. _ �t LO I.t6J Loi. ,1 g'34^ : • '� -�-1P srn.ey contrd Pohr .c PCIA s"1gb v-1599.99' • t q�J✓3 N0�7 4 \ ExstM n / 1 1 FrS4�' ♦ /� ♦ i Q y~ t ` o'.aurxty Az corn SI OP Land \ • • q7 I \ �' .a..ra r.t ro a- Pc,A?\ 7,vy. L-tBBBY Long Sib*10/1t' 71 r Arco = 2.0 acres 3 / \ A CdcWoted cane' s Nanrai0+ Poww ` -r t JJ' nA ��7.� ,' _ -�'p1, r Asr no mMumentorlM set .. �� I517` arm JAUAT' mra �� \ ` • Rm POO/ph fared 9 pqAiow7 _CI? _ Sa477:31�W - '� SB07010�IY \ • \ \ O bm h t3�`►. RslB.SB99' t B_g1 mom. AM7$S U X` "-REC o weave d/saetion \ PnAi� �'1'J fArow2w ptf pt0 /'/' leis✓ f&Jg'El \\ .\ Fre ck ✓ i. v <" n'.69' , / `.gyp" 1 l set at o Mary �, ` YS't\..;g?EF,vrow7 91 - ?O' wb. cave. .aswnnr V D 1�.,.^ \� ® AM nde mind Maher 11 ■ Cmcrotc/grm/te mw7umenr Awed k t9 s m Bxlpfm r uw..ne 91 Pope JJ9 1 St `\ \ 0 fo be s!t oov /n st dlJcretiwr firm 27, 19R9 - R F Bourdeor B -]`n Cwro 1 S/ \ ♦' '• \ , �+ (%tstde bounds-y /Mo vcw.-ne ,ds Pas,. 92 e lod�bd Mpb - �ob2's7• ( reiWl \ f-� Lot baun rhe /n 4u Anq - 727'.5 • (haAfef t /m No.ember t ,9sT ,6 \ Remaining Lands Eoswn»t Lire OBr%en Family Limited Portnersh%p Remain%ng Lands \ PCYI sate.,* /he 3 Area = 155 acres \ Total Area of Forest Park Reo/t orest Park Realty Corp.G�ty (�j SO. \ ♦�` \ \ \ o-,Ptt ro GV710 -`, y Corp.�• Area = J4.5 acres Bur' .y £x/atAq woad !hs s watt i_ and OBrien Family Limited Portnersho Bur' �yton 't Of 1 parcels is 68.5 Acres ♦ \ ewrr i% IY73Z309"W. \ \ 6�t.Os « J61.91�- Dardd B 50574 J2 W' I 7J ag. 1s r 21 fare' enn /ro City o/ SouM Bur/hgtan ' .......,,..,. .t Rendol/ 17 A t ,i uns . ss voy. fa /9s ✓.twee 71 Pop. 1 1961 vdwn. S5B P Pay. JJ, ,...,...,..,....>` f\♦ ♦,\ \ 7s wp. ,7 swrawe- 1, 1984 No 1991 T.q Ste.w7 B A-4 I ' 111 ,....„,...�"'"".• .,�" IIE \ Goldman �,J Deed References __ "' _ •• ♦ \ 564 Hopwood amt■e d• urea Dote .,...., ._•J"•� , \♦ \ AAy JL 199J r.4- 175 Pop, 5a 'i \ fi-/_'on tcv ' Ady 2 1981 I \ amid J 01W/ a tea OV,/-, A, to Val- F ry LlnRed Pwtne ,b AM/N6 O.crm6- it. 1997 \\ IYiNlan ct MwtO A�Ja1 OEYiv+ &.the. -a I. F r Pa* Redr Cn I r 1421497 Augvar zi, 1978 \ ♦ ��%.7 \ \ I Wainer �V 1 NafMo R. Fit-, ro 029- 19-m-a ♦ �•\ Ydum. IBO P.P. eflJ # 1 Ar Rrpd1.w IMI1i7 Na,w,rb„ 22 1977 Aupeaf l9r1? ro S SrW� ■�'� Robrr P. Ryv� to 09bn B'oMna rx/1t7 Naie.,,e.- 2z l9n Ael,U T 2 {1 Farar. ar c- o0.4n I. L- J 02Rr �, ,` and 0-n ,( DAJ. WIO 00.bs /Q f95e -V \ N C1pa. Robert P. Ryon rn ' \ ♦ ♦ ��r f .yam t .1:. Ydune 6a fiage 27J # N W620 �Y $�v �� J 27 w$ - Bu ington Hyhwoys &Roods - me 66' 27e Of o-122 - -- [■V " u -� �� i� �1 O-'w 24 1963 % �� � �W 12 o-r2J - ...,,.,,,,. �, 31Bf iB rwe esz ad F Rom 0trt f Pvp. � ad Fa �i e�k - _ ... ,151^g1 R �� ......-- /°i�� -_' - - rm Rood S/ ;� '--1 -�-- - - - - OS5 15 W •cv�ao RrA,wve mn ? ^ 't .to' Poo aerboa !OP) 1053 08" �_ ., ,-•_••.....••-.•^ -•.'-- k 1 ` - - « «. r ....-.,-...- �....pydj R^=.}=; cr-�ros�7w 271.50' ,,,/cih e f� .w'ennough - - --� - _ . ,,' l� I ....SOSJ'r' �1s0 \ Dame/ a A Sondra Oa /ev a & tea a d _ GYd Fa7n Rood 7079 0 TY « d t Cay or Omen o�i., - --- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ���Swriid AAy 29. Doubt ✓. ct Leo d ..I: O7i1YM a� . ��- �, / Yrr� is 4oundo� Nit tee Bat' SCO/e , , ,ab --- r. M. e-aj.tAx.. el Lr.r Andy and M..w r. A,ceted e e ., My 6a., y d.r.,charL,,, 6--f a, d-d. r,- ea�,..,a s rh. a t- or M..ff. , ar m.wa. Po...,.c., o- os,.- - _ ... - ---- - Ar,-u 9. zcnz - - -- nylt et .ey---- - - _ -------- �n di�'/� .xbrhp m fM Paa,d eero rmwavd ord mdN.d fo pranM. reead d h Me PWA, r mde DY vAAYr tRN a rp1ra eve. nwkbr obLnt r/ Mr'e b or ,oa /rorw bvwi w-fnwa _ onto rs�I«d Osea66dr iL7,esAwd pay /ird 6ovrraby mmr hacarih, o/ M. n4Mrd hr.,f of btoL • 0 BMW. - T aA r d«d. aM h op..e+w,t dM .rbNp Myw'ro' marwnn o fk.+ Pant Y spa's a r111. w' /1W,bP . OikMn MnN jr y rwo ^�, -WIA- Ar >v6 fete wlwl cvx,Akta befwln fxrlexo ,Wb.w -4 elflMwl .rideiav A-t, F ry LPWW Pa'Mwrnh and For«r PaR mdry Lnpa'dAai wws ,cirri oral Y an trek' ftd m Mb P'ar a sunv)s a. wd.f o-d, aM/ dxvrrwib droned b. e+rrvtW otl rrbr at✓hvorsuf 4, r repay to M. o •<Ynxy as bpd/iy or fo .iMet. a r ado- o/ dN. a cvnAA: f. th- arch nr der to Warr tho- 0-* - otxxmnr, or a 1a 7 1M p✓o( o/ avr/ b Ra- 6M aM u« o/ 09A.+ Fmwy r:+,ir.d F 4p 1xre.l Pa! Rdty Cov W M. by 2 Ywa,nr.te ho.. even «f h and on fM ywnd ar. Me.n Lnprrnw/y .aeooted or o matt- - -t- rrra-r a om4rbn. h A 4 a' ro+faer ar ov 6erW Woe v+arew, r6 w and -14. a u„ oMr prgorry .rive; P^�1. o-'r'_'✓abo✓ k ,pvn'AMly u+9n,Aa-brd m M, plot o/ -- M.o4 h M. gahA- W B» sa It caMet/ma o/ I- Mn rM 410-1! b -d rf- y not - ra. n.eded ra dray o Pohr na! oMa.sfis //rcwn.w,rea wxAR Q Ar o/ M, W, hG,olyd h NW, y an avD,Yct to M. 3 !n. Dowdrry Ar(wmrhoum and 6omdarf« r✓,o.rr on awo 1 My dgktAr, ar fM Pbf. o/ my d tawdry eh.r cmdfk- eM -,. hloarW by L6e S(Oy a/ Y t Land u« 0 7() M P,vMrFix, Pork (A/a vLYMq aM .cbfrrt fo MI aarrracy arM l yorty a' faM of eubkrRy o/ Mr a,.vchni a+aSrsrN o/ Dovaday /i'rn Rr 0. aerN»nNJ. my pvrfw v pmt« do prorrr,.e M, nphf e/ oes'ty ro Foaly rAnr'yd Parbwnl�(, o.d Forsrt Port R-ny caywetk" cm rK.hr a Ca1rWM prrprry ar rglri h OfKw rrr rorvrM by fodbtmebp P/WM,Y Tab✓e of Bearlogs and Distone" Lrre Bianitg Dbtrncy ro ROMPrX A777779'M' IJl19' ROWVX ro Lomw N1ts7o'ROY MW AOMPT.IE ro ROWW MVV-IWV E412' R~ to Wit Mr57O'ME X. 15' 011 J/ 411 16 Per /t l PTO i ets t' J`�:. g p Undt ew, i 49 J b 334.3 � -�'.- dJ3 Existing Trees to Remain / Nor �Wit yl ti W ! 1`€ ,.. 33s,0 it1i J 5 ACESi' ` ` I One , 1 � AeF awi z _ Loll t � T • '. C 334.0 33+.0 0 tt �1 33xo ® m ® \ Now 4W 'o ea ED - �.LI/ 1 0�. C k4 ca • I \ a t: c ,,. Q ® o r 046 ea/bN ro/ bo Vow m i � x Path _ - Jr - -- Stamwotr \\ a''•. `�, JO' L oca/ St�esf \ \ wwgry aow Bufhr ta0r,thg el,� . -" -- \j , - VE - — �_— _ a / _ — z - m t Me ro WAL 17.571.80 Landscaping Notes* t. roch bui/dog /s odoted o /andecopmg budget of $50000. 7h/s /aidscop*V wN/ hdu*..• seo green j/nyerx onthony wotrer spireo, bumhg bush A)drangeo, m/gho pk7a spbo von houte, ,vrleg and dogwood Z fo, /ondscping ding Nogd/oway SYraet and HVISbo ough Orl" see Atostr Loa,dxoping plan by r✓. Boyle & Associates. aeoring /knits - - - --- P[MYM E—Stanhpton CIWi Kq /SyrAOsr AItT. PiMr NAME SYff aw oast $ totd $ ® 1 do Aus# n Pho (Phue Myna) ?-10' 1$0 ivw ? 1J Mhav */U" (ft- btmoo) e-,0' 200 2" _ _ .j 14 SkA *--to, 150 21W _ I it Rohr &ub*W (fie) J' 775 Sex _ S ?? Catou* Sm $ uns (Abm Pra/yn+ Vmco7 1012' JW a-M B - 20 Ph owr. (Awme Pdu bp) ? 1/7' 220 anv 7 12 Owk a an Anwrka/ Arbw vNew 10-lr IV _-- two • O m Sao drat/ dk*" J yaf 35 y MTV 4wit rwi &me --- J'- -- ,a See taMaeophy „eta le-?,- see 7OW FOR PERMIT REVIEW Design A& L cndscaoinq Plan - Stoningfon Circle o' so' ao' a' _ —1I�' Drown Clucked Scale - O Brien Home Farm BAR SCALE r e, Jc Dcte j 4 taw A :YW Old Form Rood Sauth Sum" Vermt on Project CY)IB? --.. '. AR9S & /.ANSINC Consu/hity-'nyineers, Inc. n ... — 149,e*7.60 grand told Iw * = e ^°°w^- - -- 6 / INV dfain Street Colchester !'etmont 05446 am 1 0,9 1 &vok C000botAAms I-fkm f wlhg 8- OArlen brothers wel/es/ey Crowe.. lee P." x4 *.Y 14 IOU Condominium V./- Rq. 205 \ \ \ N^!a""°� 4 IRM Georgetown Association, Inc. W-. 12J PW. W SwPowb- 24 1078 (tip) Plon " i g 421 - 117fiyMah�? - an -ZQ!?_IQ Fw w Peet 1055 NvAdOn Road P. a aw 2w s. A-bbotom v—t m4ay Rwaidww 7 Z-Aw 16 App-0-t, k-t- faxPa-val 1280-00200 -Whq 12"AC ♦ra, Pace( 0070-OOZM % if �f -*t#w 12- A. C Sulth Bul-AIIgat CPA PorinersV Arro - M.,00'se 36 a wadend 6610. v- K= Of" LJ 0 &AYA)91- Vh- so P." 489 ALVA0 I IPU Wk- M POW 487 A.P.1 14 1904 HA- 73 P.W 15 ", 24 14064 A YCA- 7J Pugs 14r Augwt 24 1 vesen C Vfi- 73 Pop, 17 Sqf-�- 1, IM4 L ocotion Type III N. r.S W&Idge Homeo &ASOV LOY Vs-aw-- prafflosw tot Comwouss x Association Mon V Ir lmtAwn. 175 ft" wwr Pr.tali Pv*tp & Aw Pft nona"m O.Ib- 24 19M io paspd Rax�*PfAol LAn;ts, row Sbv oft It, 150 at r.W - 107 L%ft Ybew A"W. MA000 f "C.A L.( I -- rOMO-- 47 OWS ." ebwww - 27440 f.- A J mw LotAwwn#Y - v Uft I of ON A4 ............ 2-47 r 4714 - IV Fieo6v/ck ✓. .A: ` \ `\ 1''"'� la � .v+ �'�� \ \ L.1 2 A"YAb.& - 00 09ft B A/Ory \� ` M' wlw aaaas ! 4P@-M/W# * 10- 4-14 -ft f 66. twy L;z POP . 411714 - Us v.-1- 91 Paw 4— P- A.Y.W 472 IMP Farman & .1bkc. �Y \ r �%� r ` \ Bourdeou V.t- IsU Pbq. 92 9w Rernath*7g LandsC'ty \ ��. /\ fof SO. Bur fingtorl O'Brien Family Limited PartnershipRemaining Lands Area 15.5 acres rota/ Area of Forest Park Realty Corp. Forest Pat* Reaty Corp. 40 and Ogrien Fnily Limited Partnership Area = 34.5 acres 40 parcels Is 685 Acres 40 4v R..MMW 7 40 aty of swo 4 . Z.7 Pag. 4W A�f 1. 1964 M~ 56 Pay* 487 A.Pt 111 1964 M—A- 7-JPw. 15 .61YJA 15V4 Donald & 7" W*- 7J P�91 ff A.Wlt ZQ 19W41 Randall Vbk� 7JPapt 17 1964 Iw- im Papr if/ Waiman 1"i Stown & Annie vft- W CoMvr at Be,,,./y d...........,� r ` 4''r..^.J�' "^'" ....--�., \` ♦ \ \ \ Hopwood 1 +Wyr' \�\ \ JY. IM A,1, I I P- 564 F� 5*1 I ff1km Mali, % ce 411> wm- Im A19. 483 AV,W.e.Z IMF 4w Robert A Rpm K . 19KY A- M A19, 27J 1 7 ojymgt- HVA-O,- & Roads vetwo $6 ZM27'r -4 I A*. I 1812 CM f- R-d W-, 126 FW. 4F52 AA4 tJj f978 CYd "arm jo pw -46,01, 0dow sand'a v*vv .1 & Lea, a 0 vrk" 0 Wien el & Loo J. J-. OR-ew C—Af I Z-ft Ady ZA Donl AfrMants MuIy 2 2W2 4 4-1 i 2OW .16 41V102 F.&I-Y 24 2X2 MA 2A51W 0/ Alplml 4. "1 ton 1 and J Imp �•7bl _IL2 r Coobw Pow M-V rx"79 hl%*-1 Notes: Ora" Design J141, 0 V(9rGII 1:11cn A Coftiateo' rorrw Almurnentallba -- to be **I at oxnsr.r d*wf/vL I. Me Aocallon and Matv*vv a/ axostkq uAft'" is not wafrantoof Checked • Aron pop Iound to be emoct or corn#01A Me Cbfl&vcw ~ flwo, Ibcols, off scole Ilow - 50, lac2X' pmpdty /Aye UNINOS and be so/s/Y resiowsAve 1br of Arlsthp Wau" and 0 Rrien Home Farm thak unhtsrvvpW serwinew. ?he Conthoctor &no# contact 019 Date AftL 2M_ ckisf*v wood Awe So/0 6*Avv coarmenchg any munk J*Awal "Woof I Pro joct OV182 I CM F.. Road South V..nt a,, 2. a& P/w Is ft no War a bowaby swwu FOR PERMIT REVIEW RA" & L&vsf've con"d'vrw ~ne*rs nc- 2 Ix S-e .[train Siree4 Cololkeeter, ;'erMonif OS-e4fS w AM .. sa `"" aq�' _, '\ / , K J14.4 Avg, 16 Pad J1' -t / / Wbrl■r111 A,fype Ml ram, Q I 4`J Mx r,Jra.J ' l Aos-mz-. �vsti 5>I�. 1 r. _v� f ..1U: (h aW and asctJ■r , ., / <r rat 1 A■r JM - ' e MK Jpxs RI" , JA -Ner. SIIIY-r `� _ r.n; Rim J288 I _ nw Ni hK h JAI 41 ! P JJ MK our T20.JI , / f f�-T _ Rwn Z. 7d ' �,,3 / \ ^ , j[[ I l a,t. wr 6.2 f 1 epk, /nv. h 321.26 _� _ t� ` / c 1 - , `•! J \ 1 '� t m v J24. / - I.(, j_ 7 /n v ud J74. 0 63 2 ��� Inv- out J21. 16 Rim 3288 .a, `• • - .. +t5 ��'t � w or SNA �K 324.5 1 i M 4s II ;° Aw. Pi J 1 j K,atas nzJc 51 © _ ®Aw out 321,fr, 0 � New B' �/ . •d-/ -New Ce -t New h.K*v"l ' . J,j3. -:.® V n ' nw e;r B1 e• E vl� 1 I 1 Q u ,, Rin 3JJ.60 9nb vdro _(-paempry_ S 3,i3S 1O , iI � �' /• �{ - -- My J77.50 ~ 'IIJJJQ ' I N.r s' PLC � ~ y \ � d• � o 8 1 I .� u..,Ra, , I �� 4 _w i ACES , ` _ ! ... / • v. 3255 ,\ I ! .._ _. ud 32.i 5 eI ' 8.j Ner e'k B•. / cadet Rh r ZJ27 I� \ -+ I _ - r. _ . (S 7 -• ,I ' / - •C • '� 90. CNaa" - egpe• wets ��- M1�l:- \ Y .1 ' � �. '. •' ., w s'r wa, 4 .� / 1 rwA,tro(4PJ--y 11 -. VI - '\, }�( °' � /� ;� �\'�,. 1 naa 1 1 New JI4 J/.., i •� J/I• h ` New I J �St-r 33a.0 ti 4�v !! ` /y( I - 1,5 ` LO(1c f ae (wJ IbeKN , � • � 3J�0 0 aY1.0 J/r r f x �6s�aor , f, New cB , ® 334.0 * I ew CB , -Ner awn `h storm m ,i322 �ti Rbn JJ1. 50 _ RA/ 3JJ. BO }r \ ` d•e ,� v 32 A9 6 n {i� ryL� 3Ji i \ n v J27 65 hK h J2187 I New CB r $� U l' o' •O - +i AW /1'. 4 M✓. out 12477 Rin JJ90 I \ i �� N C8 • , l I r'Us `g J ra R ; 33� • _ .Inv. Mat J 1 � New ca ,:. I - 1J• /nv JJJ.7 Riln. JJ.'d25 ��� t hew�M I Mv. ud .��It7_-_� \ �. N�yaot '.\\/nv 00 I 'f 1 L".'/ �, y¢ •a Lq T! •1 ( / 4' t/ etd^1 \` /nv. 3.SO..i4 v I 76 ,pJG `kt0 `,`N.OM Latw _rWw CB (�'' I �, ', G• '4 u a,K Ma m spLC ,-a aa7 � 6 4 20 1►q \� ter -� Ne:: i i R/m 336.15 \ 1 Go Iq • I '� \sa, i�tJ .. ®.: J7J --� ,-aoa7 JTS ]e ra ? '.� hK* t t.. My .SiO.11 \ `r A4w /9' Aas-NJt ,farm e 4 --sr w. t19 +, oaqq ` /• _ R!m N� a• ssemtl/J7 New Iw tee/ ty�; I • / ,,y - 9 ''( + New ! �r7Bt t R A New Ydrd OraM _% MK cY q �k b/ I 1 New CB �r .p� �f 1 New O � ` q• Rim JJ2.5 Rin 337.65 4, / +la R?n J3 � / r , to 1 I Mv. 3270'� 1 ( -. ExbM,p I,war hyrfont Mx J?.F3 - 'p ImarAoar assevnb/y C). -/i' ® 1 -?z / \R:._6p ro 1 w Ran 1, J14 y �.. .....,.. - fx. r 42 , J7807 0 � r f I Km 1�Rn J1.9u L� - 7as1� 7J \ �`, l ♦� r� c U s 4to New 4' �' d/ometw DAM New Suh _. f L I 1 t}jjt• �7 1k... /. ✓ \' - y 'P � . ' I -t�"l Q �} �\ - I1 1 Rim JJD-25 Rht JJJJS��•i New Mv. JZJ4 In m J27.18 I Irv. J79. hw- arrt 32708 4.,f JJS 66 1 « a 5 New ,1 . -Ner t h J ; New Co New t I v w O Naw SNh R �' � J sreiLr artdg I R,m JJ236 M3281B ss*"M 0 1 � 6 Rh, 344.70 08 �y _ Ldvr P \ v. , i w ! a 1 1 x d J26 43 Alrw W - a Inv, w JJ5a1 i. �o '.-; R JJH 0 B �0,r ar �sr 576h co i - " t ` New own Nwe ce `R'r..• /n v. out J35. ii Ran J4J.5 RIM 349.7 and ve'r, w/M .rnd N!r JUJf 7i 1 _: ed N wr. }r11� rL- ±-- -. J/r 16 Yti.• < 4• " - s,r: JvoAv..AN N,wt 1/q344. 15 M✓. out 1.?J .. 4 _ ••.„, t -:U' / New r o cnxn ,,y5 nr. a' PLC' Mv. ud 344.4 aAaorvl ✓ mre 4 3 1 Po a-aOF¢`'. g v V-may �.!•, _ .ern . R'm 3400r New CB ..,. Rim 334,2 t.' r�7\ I �,` • :...�,_ �•'e ti -1` l Q New SAfhl •' 0�, /� '� v'L Q b'� \ • AOS I �w 'Nw /O` �ALrr to lnv 324Q5 .../ 1 1k 45.0 /nv M JJ183-3� �y as ,17K4 "' - ¢^te' - /n v. out -TJ37J 7$ 1 -- _ '°M • R1.� �M� / v. ud J29Y5 New CB -1 .0 •vas' ,?' y 8 - B n RIM J4,�. 5 J/� 1 16 Nam. J/4 • A T 7 sw Neh �/t�"d' _ ` ni +�ao, _ Rec✓ My Ju87 t'~ �e 14 roe ] raw or aa,�' i J _ �' _hv' ud J3695 l Rh h. Jffi7M75 I 4 �Nww CB N ,r d f I \ O RA" Jw..J6' -- _ �•`�. �90// �-<e -t-'' xe• r« ewd / t,� ../.. A`�- aav °wo j S n� _ ArK J279B CD..t ,eM �� _'., _. rr LNsw t19 aar 4% � a � # Rht maj M✓. ud J282J �� Ner `' �x a 59� 4� , `,�; I ♦ \ ana' wtmar RA» JC3323. --' � ,e, � � � � �. ; , ^e'/*cb �^� � �„� Nww nbl y New 12 = / �° � � �pJ ` / Mv. J4.S75 hv. h 373. B9 45 z »� '' ossemb/y 100 : hv. ud J453 ♦ ,ea is- !b _ New ce 12 x e' tww / \ hv- out J2.T.59 � r , -.!�M ,ypp Nn Ib'Nr/n" �wJ„� Rim J59.0 / \y / \ 1, New End 5wet/on / �(� __•R -' b' J- er /ne 354.2 Je� New Xo. / �L� , \\\ ♦ nvvc.12425 /nv 324.23 j1 1. _l \.� _ war.. '^aa •._ --� _ ___� one .+e..wr SS� a ra•■a � nv. ud 354.45 New h/d-ont ....., \ �W- ti-New Co =' ;� R ♦ - stamrotw / L6 �° Rh, JJ42 Y /F'otlf , . °y ✓ �w ce ♦ ,.�. /$t 1� _1-I fnv. J74.70 ._.S - f R/m J62.5 .1 ♦ Q,fMtxdl�%reatmMf .,1- !/ /llY. ud J29.45 _ - `.' - �x[b •,•_`•+�-.�.m A'^•' !1 CY S9 - I / -N~ ' _ - $ f Inv. 357.5 *'al`r•i New CB r '� r Ayw 7O. 'a- ....�y. S ... / _._ otv iM -- Inv. ud J5Z 7.5 i 1 \ Rim J4J 5 �� ARL'-NAP •$• rB6i - 3 - / \ 1. ♦ -t Irry JJ8.5 •taunt . _t__.__.. 7rgQ ._ IQ aypm _ 1 . ud JJd 75 rb em. \ 1. ♦ d wnnu. aa■ar �e _New Swh'�--_ '• AYw tr,torm R/m 387.4 d Rim 343.67 ��� ~�-- __ , aW7 /nv. J57.B InK h "..19 _ ^---_..��-_ _ � BB.00 /nv ud im 05 1 \ _ / hv. out .i76.09 New Stth Min 359.0 Now_ -'-..�� r� Rh" J6J.73 Inv J54.0 ta�r..e°�u wed - - Inv. out M7..5 /nv ud J5425 cm, o-w wf&- ,o•.SZLe J5. Aw JM , � „r -1 C-&WA" Notes FOR PERMIT REVIEW O. a- eawrbp wmr th./AeftMo. -w �,. s, ,. cw,e,wrrwr Deafgn Utility Plcn - Sfoningfon Circle I. fie /ocotion and motwio/r of existingutdilies is not worranlad -- -- -- -- -w - -M IM-- Plganaed Mbfr uNvjlh KM Erbrnp ANswt °• J07' ea' 17a' !atl' roe lo- t to be exocf ar complete. fie . I rrocter zstl NNd locate d/ _ _ prom fNP NN_ _ - --r E �d d'wa /Ma /i- .w*e h utH/tAwa and be sdMy reslomrM/e /w d/ wxist/ng utd,'ties ond- rrvvwrrvwv� oewhp Ah✓A R'gnu,.d axb aAw the/r unhten-upted sevrlce: fie Cone octa sha// contocI Dig �� - Ch=ke6 _ ------- n10 rereo�r --. s .. --- s--m- nwtap saw uw/mrwKw ■ cw,c ata nwnwne,r Sofe before commanchq aiy watt. $. Ift/�A■. 0 e- RDe <- - �° O Brien Home Farm 1-� ' EaMp sra+wr tna/roa» bah - o-e:,�, d,w °QOaiO pO`ie `ooO /O R01e 2. fils plan !s In no woy o boundary surrey BAR SCALE _ J' JO' Date �:r I acwl �tr-sr-o- srwm nv woew retoted work to be perhrmed in occ-ardance with x ,iyee..d tar./ r + wr. acne tau.» yoea +tor r.»�ra, 0 Prweard vowe .,Jxwa+A]bete earn .x All ,. --. -_- _ the �ecifkot/au and Details hr the Msldlotion of wotw " :s ,r.,� "'9 �, '""` '"" -.°. .% o Pro t _�1� _ p'd Fam Rand South Buvlh tm Ywmant �, to HWut'ad uaM`oY¢h + Sfrr ----ry rv- Pq--d Monnp d-o� //nes and gppurtwonces fa aN rooter Systems Owned by the 7vfxn°""` x�' �"ar "�°°"'^�'* .:,,,' v c _• . 30� &*thg awkw 4 4"t Pe,f Crian#ah fbter Olstr/ct• the M of south Bur/M ran, and ;; ; ^ ^ ma ° sa iPRBBS B LlNSINC COnaultirr<q �SrLyineers Inc. m. „ , 3 Y 9 �� waena •* „ mp ens ar - -„■•-_ Prq,o,MCmrary the W/090 of W*00.' u.w,xm, �µ awew_� ----- --- m _ ISO Alain Stree4 Colchester, Vermont 4964W - qwr stth / c4 $ r new i. NO7F.' Me>t� II ,2^ ,.y'R.M -Wh / tr, V - Ewt ` The connection to munlcool wafer _ 4` b �'' R� roP�` e11N1" s tam WWI via one of two dtemotes. Z.. h Jl&98 / .,t�,1�g��.,ye, ys . hv. out J1otr39 - eti'` .` dim r 4r M mot& / wiH be to top Me 1/ne Match Line I pk 7 New SAth Georgetown / I Y. \ P� I ev. h nsssr se ring the Geagetawn dero/opomenl. / ._ 1. ��_ _-_-. � ...41 _ \ ax ovt 1/se Rk" J27.1�.,,... ` \ A/temate 1 wA/ be to bola under /a Newer /"/�/ /nK kn J7614 ,.�, 4..t% Ryrt 3T4.4 r✓ \ \ V��: Kennedy ONro and connect to the ,brv. 32RB5 \♦..-'ecl� I-.----r /n v. out 316.04 '•+"�. �ex/sthg 12'/ine. / /J N r S✓h ��• ��`t �w`•�d / � br v.\ 319.0 \ �'-. e•pYC .ttw JJ --.Ci // Section / ; ' ' / • l \ r N ^�\� 557 j1or. /ini73iZ Inv. 321/ /not J�.92 l...-NbuwcAturnek1s3l \♦\ \ \ „"`tdam• _ -- �c\^.r�,yM o _. /[er)n ed J♦ - \ '° `� Orr `"'\� /y. w�erxse New hgw:ng r1:, e _ ting sm i II 1 e - / 00 1 .> / �Sfarnwotr Ceargetorm New CB / / r �9. / R w 321V4 �a'M Rim J2G 7 .hv. Jf2Q'�aeb. /nv. J2L7 I ,d5 / % �. / rnwht,.nt / .`/ \ ay Sk/A /lo� QQ J� ••0.5 / / .;Q / dpah ,S�/ \ \ \ \ \ 'A6Ar lure �nv" m23 /nv. ud e712.,75 - / NOIF- \ Y Inv. out J17.941/ int TA New CB ter ersection of the 8 + / sg New End ce.,rx, re' � s/ _-:; �� � Rim 52.775 t3 Sectkvrs proposed rood with Kennedy h� J�.ss New CB �; Ime, S'.._-- /n v. 319.65--,\ / htr. Jf9.5 / Drive is ahowrl for illustrative trot RO rP o J7�2 purposesActual /ntesection dlspe� ` 1 a / pdesign will be by others. pod of eler � - - rant _ \ / f /1•�.�' .y`8. i�I / ..`.ka�� q. osserna ��.��l'"'i..• 31LO /��.. 7iI ..tl AYw Bx B' a` New Q9 ,_p<'� 1 - �Ww got tee tr Ren JZA25 `.`, i r / h lop /nK 37aJ5x /_ / r i db8perso' / Q Ain .7?41TS / Sw 48 ?`� cy.- _ ; L _ 'Ii '�•}• rlt✓. ou �S/ N ,F' v ` �` l,.w dx er s' 1 ° 4 NbrYC9 - ..-New f6 Yew CB mod.m i 5� /Rln�x2J 75 Rim -WX15 / I // $ G" :vim 324.75 rwre atrte .. hnc 375298 v fd 32e.9 d ,nv J2Q 9J r _ Inv 'id J2C192 F / nK !d Jzr. K ADS Iz. 1N ! Ax ��c 1 0 , .,. I t WeA1.M6 Type0 .• Msw OL s" /I�� / R J�2,11s �' , .ee�ae em 15-Ptex II / sla,nwetr �o i / Inv., J2aa3 2 s r j A0.* 16 Pau1l_in 1 - - - - ( / / / h,K fd 72/ 92-:' // , _ _ r'wD�P Undtl7. ,eel/ 1 i I w Apprur. Prcprty Ciro n, Exbling pawl Pole 1 f y5 Net. son tl'r \ - �` .. Svrwy co fnv poor 44aa RM Ji1.2J , A - - -mow- &4o'g W t- Line/gate ra/ro r7 \ BOIAt 1 1259�) New MAW, n 50" d r+W- Prgoosod Water Une/gote vo/ro OfHkrc+t p•Fi�P� - 4 v A JR1.23 i n blhg A/oYOnt \ New End / 15-Plex tsv. J$ l i ti� Q� 61K out J21�IJ , %-rY�x'`C^�'v Exratng tree /hs 3% Proposed hytYmt \ Sect/an / / v J tMrtdd� - ,!`r A r rYYYY'YYYYrr v'� GYsorh /F»ll9 Parkin - / 9 b Proposed a6 :rcp t� H -.- - - s m Exists Sewer Uve mtnhde 9 s / / /. v / o Concrete mamma-- \ \ f r Q r Under �d' / nxtnAr t 0' • � Jse _ e++few W el3''' / ossPrnbly r, \ T�•� �/ ( AgpOeW Sewr Lhe/fnwNdi O rrm s - : r l '... Ran "a5 aa»a- t«a.0 ` i y Rimw .U41 JO.. /yqy � A \ - - 9 / -. pogo flow /n. ado pet elsl - 7 /n Kx J2091 // �y _ / _ �sr�� xs omI tCn Dolh 331.E m grad spot e/ewtron ___VVVoco ^wt �r-� Prrgooeed St LUne%o QF' 1.s5 s bosh v. ud 324. .\\ 1 nrreae.ts. S t' 7f- q .•� , e � - Archordogicc/ sanitiro \. f- Proposed underNoh -%91 . New CB end parr tdk ter / 7 sl-'CB I Orro. No subsurface r l R ��- Ex/sth9 cmtow 0 z1ot post \ Rim 32&e �� _ �. \ ryy - .. R JJSJB e'YM J3 earth distwbance wiMouf ed7 - - • . I /n v. J245 / /' / �:'ev l v. J21.G6, se.r me prig- written opprow/ - C /-�- "; "338 "- Proposed } nv. ud J24.75 !^\ J •Q y/ the Deportment of 80)6di erosion control • -�. �� �\ /,�j _ Hista^ical Preser tion. '' +'"� Proposed Pored roods/ponthg 7R' y.l I I ry1/�. f '.�? 3 •Rd�y' wy�'.g1' �i f r-_. � Sot lance sroslbn control • I /% O /" I\ iYcpasM Powd s/dewdk/bete Poch A Arch-Wag/col senmhro -ea -- 1 _ r'1� ... ` I .w. e . e•. a '/ ,' :.ve. s x I w � '. � Rin JJS IJ - - - - - - - _ PC/D selbout -.- _ - -� Snow feres barrx 1 { erc»o- w ono , � . e• x e' • ' \ 7S �hK h JZ6.93 ... 0• I i. pnr d.vm : n. k ,r hK ".t f :.. r: Lnn rcmraur % New C8 I " ,we4ahtt< $ 11 q iS ,V A, Notes: /-•CIRtm J709I1 't New CB �1 / \ ,)f'le O Notes: /ne 1255 � Rim JJCS91 e�J// �(� - I IInv. ud 3251y5' 'ii ' w eke x " 4. JPB O2 " 4 t{ 1 \ A ` L 1 VO• 4! 1. 7hs /oeotlen and molwlals of existing uterties rs not worronled �1 `i, e' t.+ a p,r. .\ Ry \7s• i Ayw p} a-x e- \ °9i (}�r'i' to be exact or canp✓ete. The Cmtroctor sAdl frdd locate oN trr x e' / \ �" _ uhVit/es and be solely rwsponsb/e for d/ existing ORtim and �i. ! wh d• V . \ -d rw.ynn.pa / "/ qy, tr r.dw \ roar unirterr services. the Cm tractor shall contact Dig 1 k / k4► !S ebm �/ a / A Sale be/ore caomm tsnenc/ng any wVrk. ,-a 10 Qd Q \ � I •. .,'w`a - - . Ajsant fie• 1 �''�`�,. ♦ f ry . 4 / fiie plan is h no way o boundcry survey x �✓.. �/ / J A// watw related work to be per/canard in occrrdmce with Lan S{ �� RNn JJS.oO o.rra t 1 Under Parki ' ` Me 3/ieciricofions and Lbfops /cr the lnsto//otlan o/ Water CO✓; r" .� _ i hK ,� / Jines and cppurtenonces for o4 War Systems Awed by Me Inv 321. 5? i y p _Cnomp/oh Mhter Oisb/ct, the G'ly 0/ South Bw/hgfon; and New ca ,� ,� the Vi//o9e of ✓edrha \ V` 54 v� eroor and lbn J27. r? : IMaw d9 1 \ t �.rpeArga 9 n v /d N CB { /I=15 � \ �.r, Ri J9.0 r+� AWr ►iesr v. I Inud JMV G1C /n v. - JNew Gg de.rorlr - �y 0 - Ns� f1"o `Inv JJi2 Rim JJ5.25 ft-'.Sreer7-' eo' fro' lap' / \ rto"'^e• \ My 'J0J4 ui._. Nowa' Jn' Ce I I _ / r New CO 329. B4 i Rrm J36.25 / \ \ GO• 15-Plex 1 InK J21.97 - ` I . •:pp/ // New 4' two '� , �7 16 Parking Neer C9's �` No W _ R/m 725 ` I 5 BAR SCALE - Jo blohc & sf \ �� 4 'Under /nv. 2 A Av. fd A24 / --: _. -- ----- J ZBD Av✓. fd J?•R 42 / • . h v. Id 324.42- I � • , 1 � q Y /? 1 1 ` t�1 ✓ /iVrw �a O \ ' '1 .. / 4gat aw�vah wie'- curer cnvne,n r, erp s ♦ \ ' ' eYrry zS 7tle7? evediw% parhg /apvt, e d Mar a do/rtd erp Rim :2725 - ft-0r r4 "I brkdhpa parkhp -A rl/14r01 My 3.727� AUDW 1•t 2oa1 mtoh betel hre-t 3b6 \ 1 &v & 324.4_P - - aoN .enled Iteeojrtkn O'wcFed Lbfe }y� .5 f j \ t L a \ ., Z AG• tip xr'.._. ... New C9 i DeB1�^ Mx Plan - Lancaster Lane J22. 5 Drawn AP/SW Streaked --_-_ _- O 6rien Home Farm 1_/0 ♦ , \ \ '" / / Scut. /'! New J2 Date y_s tADt___._ Up -New R.4rr i27.00 ./ inn J226 Pro ct � old Form Rood Savth Bur/h ton Vermont I k, y - - - _ _ _ -- - - --- - ----------------- --- - FOR PERMIT REVIEW --- � AR r4 I �NSINC Co7zrulti �' seers, Inc. _.._. 5 164 Alain Stree4 Colehester, Vermont OS446 J� \ LZ 41, r I A I^ D•y`�`- —_ _� __ _� _ ,d I I eae -t , _ _�,,.�.. \\y�\\\ , ,[i . � -y ° E+,� S k M M C� 4 '-'�`� •� � 1 yj ��j• ,E =�_%" or\ � ,-f�j\\ '\\\\.t / �;r::�`sq" `�`-; ti K ^s Vi 'O C ii --.—_. .__._� / 1 :9 vp 9 v"vs 0 /7 \ .. � //,, � � i ,�\ \ _ // /' !1 •.^111 II + IIII// � l,aa sl 11Ii 8 xa s , // A \ l \ 1i✓ ;��}� �= t/ / NJ I7il l i!!hl 1 W "I a• / 6,,, ill f r. a j/ / 111 W x yy vvg-In a3 /yam .FeeeA .1 , \1 1 '�` �\ �' /,/—� \ ••',IIII u � ti` '?11// � R �' I LLJ :�/ /�� IZ LL /KID Q11111 g t pi I 'A -! � i .: / 1 _=••S. �fr � i � ; as Ing �gg I - . / °p�rf' � 1 E '' I '� / 1 I I " 1 / � �:... ,. �-, . �_ •-ws- !/ I /� 1\ ` 1 1 ',` o �> $ .g \ g fZS�S 1\., ; I ( 1 lT y \„�K �/ �'".. i ��� �1\ � r� i t�' I,+ � ` I ___`` \I I `\ `I\l ��' ♦� � \\�, �--e1£-i��/ �� 10 `\ �^°a$a � oohs 19 INC U �` � I kl ag� / t sir a, 1 tfr`•' � Sg I �� ��f\ \ \ \ b �.'-9cr'": /� y � � o � ° � �° � �`� `o nllll Q �1 / t I { I IIII-• .._„ � � I 1 a � \ � Y� � O� �V �( / � w. c i'it oVN rl llii e I i �l �1 !!ii i410 /• PPP/// / 1 ,I i i �--� a Ilr ,� '"- 11 f �1 \ � / rid /r► g 1 1 1 11` !il It 1 I III 11 S II{j I I I (II ...//l//►�,r1►�llir 5 fl tl 1� ° I 1 (Ij/lllll l/%///,/ 1/ ill/ a d E Q � I t / 1 I l�l �/�►�/ �>� J ,r it I'll I1 t ,�} l / \��t�_► \ —_— \\\ 1I � � 6 1 11 /llllll /Ar///%�/// '/�'/ '�'1�� � ^ a o � ¢ `, 4 �y-�_ sse— _ \\ / �,r 11 � 1 !!'il IIIIr �//�i//iiT/'//,;�/l/// (' /// @-' 2i2f•P i � f _ a__/1 1 1 t l l Jv IT -^'~_ � —� �� �� �'�► 1 1 I � I I t l l - 11 � ����'�'/' I /// �/ ,% I � Zti � s r 3�€ a� /, � `` —ice___ _ /' °� � .R _{l. —�—� � •� / i"• �� �� � ' I ' I Iff I � . � i Georgetown 7 y ' sr ,too. / i ma's'- __ 37ate �/ v '' "• / / l l) I 1 t . �- .:. I .,. � •� eroaJw ,/ i^ - /// / l/)1 1 t �� w /21 / 'IIo®�'` f �•� '1'` / / / J i `' �! i !'tb` .• �","y:'''J p �, /�� , / // / ; t I\ . / \ _ �J' QIJ� .G Y 1501 / hdd p..o°M • J y // / - ..•�'� - / .!" ,/p.} 1/ 1 / to baa, dh i thp raw j / MwWY�tuWr!'�` SfobAiz / ice• i i : _ ®1Yn / - 'r.r .. // &� l / / / M"* . `` ,_t �'`�.""`.ti`„_ •` R M r _ �. ♦ n)' 1 dta+e� i ( - ay r construction 3g . / // �i�.�•' .... p:.,r1 ,.. �< .IYAdT , a% (ed • J,�i�, /, 1M r/ fo NOIF.' .•'--}.'"" - = � + entrance i i�i'.e"b�-` `---. ,. .•:.,. G _ .r„ w •�fy, / / `,, // / - 7)Se intersection of the / %' `,,�:,-,�•"•�.. / - �-,...,,• •v f• / .Exislir t osed road with Kennel t. �.- / P 1 / / l 1 t Prop y A,�r'ti g� t� Oriw is shown for illustrative •J i !�• purposes. Actual infesection 't R ¢f�` f e y / / /� �� \i'1/•. Deymd loret deslgn will be by otherz qd '//; �• c- ''� ./ tea. , � � , \ J. � � / Sly \ \\ JJAJ.-���y/�� 14. / szr rFnce • ' ... V. �zI � `� • / � � ,i '* (�\\ / ,/ //!.• / ! i i' ✓i t,6... ,� _ =�\ \ \. 'Y \\ \) 11, Jti4tG%l�/r1 d /// �.: , �, Kitl'. o / l II• �,I' %� ! lr _ / / _ '`,t / f,,.'-: ,;t}, / 16MM w.a s} /G�// ./ � SIG Xii�i ` ll 1\I\ \ � ' a� � ! �\ I /�i // , .. \ \ JX \ � I aaew 0 431ox 46 Par1d Apprax P open lhr y -n, Exhlhy paws- pde 1 starrn r / G / 1 �f Jv,. p AYJO�►MI rind¢ir. E �j E _ — OA �— E ar: y able une/yore a e _ Li su vay cmfrcr Point \ \\\\\\ Tileet/zNttf / / /; - ` ..,~ \ �'/� rpN a► won+ '� r / / j/i //-� '� \ `-' +. Apposed NW- une/9ore ron. Ex/srh A y� 1,5-PleX /fill/,/ '� v", y Awl r r . y;/ Clearhg renter 16 Parking - , i �ib Proposed won stop Under 0 - EairySLo,e/monhde o /Concrete m--I Agow.d sw, cYe/na✓as Q rappesoAll- b �p -sF---—sr--7---- Extathy Stcvm [h%otdr bosh -.. Oroboga sow / 9rode spot e/ewuon � p � •q „3 i � 1 � .� Prgva+ed Storm une cotM Doair aarn t7nish \t I ty Q f vnow on T ryv • I I i 1 / \ \ \\\ \� /�.. oreo. avbawfoceswmt i i �0. Jon --., ErletLy cantor P [Ay/t past P— Ittebance wiMouf _ `S{ Y - Agoa+ed Contour ion rn'tterr apprvro/ Jj � � I � Jade melon control am the. 007wbnenf of Il i No Histcr/ed Aess/wtion. Prop-ed pawl rooda/pakhg till �\vc\�\\\\+�. �* j, I / \ / 111\�1\\\ / t. A Y Lt9 ��,r// / : urw �b h°/°d'ww' ) swr once erosion tartly i I 1 l 9' -' �\ / till � / �Ii';t s' 'jam! �.�.� �/ / -Y - („i ; 1 RoPaa°d poMd a/dewpik/b.FI poM r/ _r- A cnoeaoycd aensifiro prop - _ _ - - - - _ _ �- Sat !w•rce Don1s- • � l � I � ' l 11 1 1 /// f � f: I � / r 1 � -. 1 \ \ �� !!! '' „ Fl/D setbaat r�r ww ca,toor anw Y /VOi@x y I Jos t � Erosion Control vents: ' _ � / `�\ � • yyy,,. f / / i � I. The /ocof/m and materials of ex/slhy u(I'ities is not worronfed 1. hsta# rosien contra✓ and snow /once borers. to be exact ar cor»pMte. The contractor sAdr tWd locate oe �'T c a I v �•/ utsitles and be sdN r onsble for d/ existfn utIlties and J Into# drainage and stWlzed cros1mctkn entrance of 1' sip 9 �{.. I - .�f ,,,,,, B.P dgr Str°°f-Kennedy DrA. /nte ecelon. thok uninterrupted sw lcvs. The Controcto-.shall cootoct Dry tx�..- - I / ,\.'y' / t. C—tract tempcwy seGmmtofian basin. Sole De%Ye cornmmcYng any work. r yla U0, A hsto# ut2/ties and shorn ahohoge. 2 7h/s Aran is h no way o Aaunda-y wr„ry. , !% .r ,• /" Q� •c + fl aVr. Y• / +� ✓: J, A// water related work to be perfamed In accordance with 1 I • I I + / 5�e(L : If `"�,1 q 1B Parlurty / % / ,r' r' me $oe C tions only Deto2s /or the lnstollatlon of water Under'= ' i. �.-# (6Pi`� i i AI i 1;' by \ ••.•, y Y,, the N g of .Aaicho. the y Of Bu g ,and �- „•.- _ ar Systems Owned by Me • I I ` , , / ; ,, � / � . �` ._=� � ere , or w ct, f o d tan I. / I it itI / a' JU' ea' /?a' lee• . •. ExlaAn areas to loges 1 a�kr1 - - - -- d3turdonce i .•...... I 1 1 1 t' i \ 15-Plex ¢nc�vtd I111 ._.di° - •1 I 1 IY I I ,,c'� ''.:. ` \�� ,. 16 Parking 1 f � 1 I, / Under ' �� /r /y _.� .--/- ..... f( "... � - BAR. CA �h 1 \ Rn; ^ .p_ J �._•..-�.._"'._•.•� May sren.n ton rpM nr a a ` Y 9 Zaa7 �}J I 11 b 2an2 as °y,r ore odor �o a.r, p s/9/v 1_`� s.woy24 2ac+2 eueehps porehproraa4 x,dPwr,we,•.,Ard Iep a/2s/oa s' \I 1 \ \_ ^ " JJ5 Abwnaw rI 200/ Auseapa pa ehp nrp nps nr 1 I rl \ \��\` ` moan ea. I1 ,1 \ R\ .. - LL r -•_, oar...s.e oeaQa x �.e D ra , � - ♦ f Desfgn IR.B ding & roe ooroononc b / Dawnked Chec _ ro os er one __; ----- O Brien Home Farm II ► �.__ .� ,__ 2�- °cam `\ _ -- t AM 1 �T _ fA,, —". _ to L-- q1 v Project CYd arm Rood South Bur/h ton Vermont '� � I 1 _ 31i '' � __ z ...-°•' _ ^ �r \ ..-�� FOR PERMIT REVIEW LANSINC '9I nears, Inc. 16V Ifain Stree4 Co(aAe9ter Vermont M4 ,.... 46 Old Farm Road ------------ 0 Bar SCGle -7,r- -30-0, 79r, �-n � It I ------------------------------------ - -------------- I --- - ------------ ............................. .............................. ......... ........... ........ --- - — ---- - - ------- - ------------------- Area to Pond I OpwYand flow — South portkv of Storhgtoa ---- — --------- ---------------- Area to Pond 2 Owdond flow — Nartly partlon of Stanh7gton Design MJ9 -- ------- Post Development Stormwcter ------- Drown Aron to Pond Y EM OwHand flow — Lancaster Checked Scole f foo, 0;9rlen Home Farm D.te vqx--&sow FOR PERMIT REVIEW I �IrS"4 ( R*sa i&n LS4fr'v*sef4vcCocI'v'h —ve t' '0.'6, . .fn, 0. CITY OF SOUr-TH BULI GTON DEPARTMENT OF PLAIaINING & ZONE'gG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 10, 2001 David Roberts Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization 100 Dorset St., Suite 22 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Traffic Study, O'Brien Farm Dear Mr. Roberts: Please find enclosed the traffic report I spoke with you about on August 1.0, 2001. Please review this traffic report and forward your comments to the South Burlington Planning & .Zoning Office prior to the August 21, 2001 Development Review Board meeting. If you. have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 846-4106. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Associate Planner Enclosure O'BRIEN HOME FARM ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Parcel 0860-00636 Parcels 0860-00630ROOI to Parcels 0970-00125ROOI to O'Brien Brothers 0860-0063OR025 0970-00125RO48 P.O. Box 2184 Wellesley Grove Condominium Georgetown Homeowners Assn. South Burlington, VT 05407 See attached list. See attached list. Parcels 0970-00175RO01 to Parcel 1260-00205 Parcel 1260-00105 0970-00175RO17 Robert P. Ryan William D. & Maria K. Weiner Windridge Homeowners Assn. 205 Old Farm Road 105,Old Farm Road South Burlington VT 05403 South Burlington VT 05403 See attached list. Parcel 1260-00103 Parcel 1260-00075 Parcel 1260-00051 Gardner & Beverly Hopwood Steven H. & Annie B. Voldman Donald & Sandra Rendall 103 Old Farm Road 75 Old Farm Road 51 Old Farm Road South Burlington VT 05403 South Burlington VT 05403 South Burlington VT 05403 Parcel 0860-00666 Parcel 0860-00660 Forman & Joyce Bourdeau Mary & Frederick J. Maher, Jr. 666 Hinesburg Road P.O. Box 2331 South Burlington VT 05403 South Burlington VT 05407 00182:adjoinm MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM 05-15-2001. 12:51:28 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 1 SELECTION FACTOR(S) FACTOR LOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT CONNECTOR 1 0860-0063OR001 0860-0063OR999 RECORD LISTING 0 w n 0 C P e w i a r n t r e y c N r / e a S 1 m A t e d a I d t --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D 1 r e 5065 0860-0063OR CERASOLI CHARLES & ELIZABETH 1 WELLESLEY GROVE 630 HINESBURG RD S BURLINGTON VT 5066 0860-0063OR VON OHLSEN MARJORIE 630 HINESBURG RD #2 WELLESLEY GROVE S BURLINGTON VT 5067 0860-0063OR SWANSON MYRA 3 WELLESLEY GROVE 630 HINESBURG RD S BURLINGTON VT 5068 0860-0063OR STEVENSON GAIL B 4 WELLESLEY GROVE 630 HINESBURG RD S BURLINGTON VT 5069 0860-0063OR LILIIENTHAL PATRICIA ANN 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 5 S BURLINGTON VT 5070 0860-0063OR PERROTTE KENNETH & JOYCE 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 6 S BURLINGTON VT 5071 0860-0063OR GORANIN NANCY CO -TRUSTEE 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 7 S BURLINGTON VT 5072 0860-0063OR HOOPER MONIKA & LEWIN TRUSTEES 286 GOVERNORS LANE SHELBURNE VT 5073 0860-0063OR WINTER KARI JOY 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT#9 S BURLINGTON VT 5074 0860-0063OR CLAVELOUX RUTH M REVOCABLE TRU 630 HINESBURG RD #10 S BURLINGTON VT 5075 0860-0063OR STEVENS ROBERT E & PEARL M 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 11 5076 0860-0063OR LABOUNTY WALTER P & THERESA E 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 12 5077 0860-0063OR WALKER SCOTT E 2202 WHITNEY POINT DR 5078 0860-0063OR FAIR ROBERT E JR NCR USG-2 5079 0860-0063OR IRELAND SCOTT D & STEPHEN D P 0 BOX 2286 5080 0860-0063OR PEARLMUTTER MELVIN & EDITH 5712 0860-0063OR LEW RICHARD R & MARY W 5082 0860-00630R STANLEY HAZEL G 5081 0860-0063OR KRAHN MARJORIE E 5084 0860-0063OR BARNARD CAROL B 5085 0860-0063OR O'ROURKE JOHN L & MARY B 5086 0860-0063OR VELADOTA LAWRENCE J 5087 0860-0063OR WULFSON JOAN L 5088 0860-0063OR STRUBLE SUSAN D 24 records were listed 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 16 18 EAST TERRACE 18 WELLESLEY GROVE 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 19 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 20 21 WELLESLEY GROVE 22 WELLESLEY GROVE 630 HINESBURG RD 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 23 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 24 S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT CLARKSON VALLEY MO DAYTON OH S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT Z i p C 0 d e 05403 HINESBURG RD630 05403 HINESBURG ROO U 05403 WELLESLEY GROVE 05403 HINESBURG ROO U 05403 HINESBURG ROD U 05403 HINESBURG RDO U 05403 HINESBURG ROO U 05482 HINESBURG RDO U 05403 630 HINESBURG R 05403 HINESBURG RD UN 05403 HINESBURG RD UN 05403 HINESBURG RD UN 63005 HINESBURG RD UN 45479 HINESBURG RD UN 05407 HINESBURG RD UN 05403 HINESBURG RD UN 05403 WELLESLEY GROVE 05403 HINESBURG RD UN 05403 HINESBURG RD UN 05403 HINESBURG RD UN 05403 WELLESLEY GR 21 05403 WELLESLEY GROVE 05403 HINESBURG RD UN 05403 HINESBURG RD UN P r 0 p L 0 c a t n MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM ) 05-15-2001. 12:51:29 ' South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page / 2 SUMMARIES OF 24 RECORDS IN INDEX/ 1 COL. FACTOR TYPE SUM MEAN STD.DEV. 1 1 Parcel ID STR 2 2 Owner Name 1 STR 3 4 Owner Addr STR 4 5 City/State STR 5 6 Zip Code STR 6 7 Prop. Locatn STR MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM 05-15-2001. 12:29:43 j South Burlington Release: 3/9/99- Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 1 SELECTION FACTOR(S) FACTOR LOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT CONNECTOR 1 0970-00175RO01 0970-00175RO48 RECORD LISTING 0 w n 0 C P e w i a r n t Z r e y i c N r / p e a S 1 m A t C e d a 0 I d t d --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D 1 r e e 2442 0970-00175R HEDGER ADAM 175 KENNEDY DR #1 WINDRIDGE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 1 KEN 2443 0970-00175R DION JAMES P 2 WINDRIDGE 175 KEN OR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 2 KEN 2444 0970-00175R KENNEDY MICHAEL 175 KENNEDY DR #3 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 3 KEN 2445 0970-00175R WILSON CHARLES T 8 JANE K 175 KENNEDY DR #4 WINDRIDGE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 4 KEN 2446 0970-00175R NIELSEN DAVID 5 WINDRIDGE 175 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 5 KEN 2447 0970-00175R CASEY THOMAS 6 WINDRIDGE 125 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 6 KEN 2448 0970-00175R TRUAX JEFFREY 8 SARAH 7 WINDRIDGE 175 KENNEDY OR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 7 KEN 2449 0970-00175R HALDEMAN MARK G 8 WINDRIDGE 175 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 8 KEN 2450 0970-00175R SURETTE KRISTINE M 9 WINDRIDGE 175 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 9 175 2451 0970-00175R BRUNELLE DANIEL P P 0 BOX 8315 BURLINGTON VT 05401 WINDRIDGE 10 KE 2452 0970-00175R LANGLOIS LINDA A 11 WINDRIDGE 175 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 11 KE 2453 0970-00175R GRIMES CHRISTOPHER SR 8 SUSAN 175 KENNEDY DR 12 WINDRIDGE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 12 KE 2454 0970-00175R RICKNER ROBERT H JR 13 WINDRIDGE 175 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 13 KE 2455 0970-00175R GENDRON LISA MARIE 175 KENNEDY DR #14 WINDRIDGE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 14 KE 2456 0970-00175R SMITH HEIDI A 15 WINDRIDGE 175 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 15 KE 2457 0970-00175R MCGUINESS ELIZABETH A 5 A JERICHO RD ESSEX JCT VT 05452 WINDRIDGE 16 KE 2458 0970-00175R FLEMING JENNIFER B 175 KENNEDY DR #17 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 17 KE 17 records were listed P r 0 p L 0 c a t n MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM 05-15-2001. 12:29:44 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page Y 2 SUMMARIES OF 17 RECORDS IN INDEX# 1 COL. FACTOR TYPE SUM MEAN STD.DEV. 1 1 Parcel ID STR 2 2 Owner Name 1 STR 3 4 Owner Addr STR 4 5 City/State STR 5 6 Zip Code STR 6 7 Prop. Locatn STR MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM ) 05-15-2001. 12:30:21 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 1 1 SELECTION FACTOR(S) FACTOR LOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT CONNECTOR 1 0970-00125RO01 0970-00125RO48 RECORD LISTING P a r C e 0 w n e r N a 0 w n e r 1 m A e d I d D --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 r P r C o i p t Z y i / P L S p t C c a o a t d t e e n 2394 0970-00125R GOULD ANN & MICHAEL R 125 KENNEDY OR #1 GEORGETOWN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 1 KE 2395 0970-00125R PIRO RONALD A 6 PEACHAM LANE ESSEX JCT VT 05452 GEORGETOWN 2 KE 2396 0970-00125R SABOURIN JOANNE M 125 KENNEDY DR #3 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 3 KE 2397 0970-00125R DURHAM RICHARD H 125 KENNEDY DR #4 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 4 KE 2398 0970-00125R BOULERICE LIONEL & PAULINE 5 GEORGETOWN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 5 KE 2399 0970-00125R WATERMAN ANN F 21 PINEHURST DR SHELBURNE VT 05482 GEORGETOWN 6 KE 2400 0970-00125R BARRY JOHN G 7 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 7 KE 2401 0970-00125R DUBUQUE LUKE C & SYLVIA M 8 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 8 KE 2402 0970-00125R FORMAN HAROLD C & RITA M 125 KENNEDY DR UNIT #9 GEORGETOWN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 9 KE 2403 0970-00125R HINDES SYBIL W 125 KENNEDY OR 10 GEORGETOWN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 10 K 2404 0970-00125R KELLEHER KATHLEEN A 11 GEORGETOWN 125 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 11 K 2405 0970-00125R LIDRAL MARTHA ELISE KASTEN 125 KENNEDY OR #12 GEORGETOWN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 12 K 2406 0970-00125R BRUNELLE ROBERT 0 & JANET M 13 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 13 K 2407 0970-00125R BUTTON GLENN & CYNTHIA 8 105 LAKEWOOD PARKWAY BURLINGTON VT 05401 GEORGETOWN 14 K 2408 0970-00125R BUTTON GLENN R & CYNTHIA B 105 LAKEWOOD PKWY BURLINGTON VT 05401 GEORGETOWN 15 K 2409 0970-00125R POULIN KEITH T & JANE R 16 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 16 K 2410 0970-00125R WRIGHT CAROL R 125 KENNEDY DR #17 GEORGETOWN S BURLINGTON VT 05407 GEOGETOWN 17 KE 2411 0970-00125R LYMAN ROBERT K & MICHELE 151 CUMBERLAND RD BURLINGTON VT 05401 GEORGETOWN 18 K 2412 0970-00125R MORELAND NANCY A 125 KENNEDY DR 19 GEORGETOWN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 19 K 2413 0970-00125R HUSREFOVIC DAMIR & AIDA 125 KENNEDY DR #20 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 20 K 2414 0970-00125R SCHELL CLAIRE M TRUSTEE 23340 WATER CIRCLE BOCA RATON FL 33486 GEORGETOWN 21 K 2415 0970-00125R WRIGHT CAROL R 22 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 22 K 2416 0970-00125R MOYER CYNTHIA 23 GEORGETOWN 125 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 23 K 2417 0970-00125R ENGEL STUART 24 GEORGETOWN 125 KENNEDY OR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 24 K 2418 0970-00125R GALLIVAN PATRICK J 125 KENNEDY DR #25 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 25 K 2419 0970-00125R RICE MARTIN A & ELAINE M GEORGETOWN #26 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 26 K 2420 0970-00125R FOLEY BANBA A 27 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 27 K 2421 0970-00125R RAMOS HAMILTON & MARLA 28 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 28 K 2422 0970-00125R WARD VIVIAN C TRUSTEE ' 3 HARBOR WATCH ROAD B' FTON VT 05401 GEORGETOWN 29 K 2423 0970-00125R ECKERSON HOLLY 125 KENNEDY OR UNIT 30 S b.,RiINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 30 K 2424 0970-00125R ABBOTT NATHAN M TRUSTEE 31 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 31 K 2425 0970-00125R DANDRIDGE MIRA 32 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 32 K 2426 0970-00125R DANDRIDGE BERNICE H & MIRA B 105 SHARON STREET WEST MEDFORD MA 02155 GEORGETOWN 33 K 2427 0970-00125R SCHEFFERT ROBERT & AUDRA BEAR TRAPP RD UNDERHILL VT 05489 GEORGETOWN 34 K 2428 0970-00125R CROWLEY THOMAS M 35 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 35 K 2429 0970-00125R MCSWEENEY JOHN R 36 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 36 K 2430 0970-00125R FISK LUCINDA M 37 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 37 K 2431 0970-00125R DANAHY MARYANN F 38 GEORGETOWN 125 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 38 K 2432 0970-00125R BRODEUR ROBERT P & JOANN B 6 CALO CT ST ALBANS VT 05478 GEORGETOWN 39 K 2433 0970-00125R BADOLATO CONSTANCE A 67 LAUREL HILL DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 40 K 2434 0970-00125R FRUNZI GEORGE & PATRICIA 41 GEORGETOWN 125 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 41 K 2435 0970-00125R JACQUES JULIA L 125 KENNEDY DR 42 GEORGETOWN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 42 K 2436 0970-00125R CLARK LUCILLE H FILLION ELAINE 43 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 43 K 2437 0970-00125R EDDY WILLIAM DWIGHT 44 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 44 K 2438 0970-00125R WARD RICHARD S & VIVIAN TRUSTE 3 HARBORWATCH ROAD BURLINGTON VT 05401 GEORGETOWN 45 K 2439 0970-00125R MEEHAN M JEAN 79 LAUREL HILL DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 46 K 2440 0970-00125R RUSSELL JOHN A 30 BRIGHAM RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 47 K 2441 0970-00125R PERKETT HOWARD R 399 WOODLAND PARK MIDDLEBURY VT 05753 GEORGETOWN 48 K 48 records were listed MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM ' 05-15-2001. 12:30:23 1 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 2 SUMMARIES OF 48 RECORDS IN INDEX# 1 COL. FACTOR TYPE SUM MEAN STD.DEV. 1 1 Parcel ID STR 2 2 Owner Name 1 STR 3 4 Owner Addr STR 4 5 City/State STR 5 6 Zip Code STR 6 7 Prop. Locatn STR 0. O'BRIEN HOME FARM CROSS -STREET PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION parcel 0860-006200001 to Parcel 09700-001500 Parcel 0815-00032 to 0860-006200009 Kennedy Professional Association 0815-OOG60 620 Hinesburg Road Associates 150 Kennedy Drive Winding Brook Subdivision South Burlington, VT 05403 See attached list. See attached list. Parcels 1680-00101 to Parcels 0160-00001 to Parcel 0970-00275 1680-00406 0160-00092 Merchants Bank Sugartree Subdivision Bayberry lane Subdivision P.O. Box 1009 Burlington VT 05402 See attached list. See attached list. Parcel 0980-00020 Parcel 0980-00025 Parcel 1260-002000 Alan D. Palmer Daniel J. & Leo J., Jr. O'Brien Daniel J. & Leo J., Jr. O'Brien 2169 Dorset St. P. O. Box 2184 P. O. Box 2184 Shelburne VT 05482 South Burlington, VT 05407 South Burlington, VT 05407 Parcel 1260-00150 Parcel 1260-00100 Parcel 1260-00080 Daniel J. & Sandra T. O'Brien Stephanie O'Brien Kennaugh Richard & Mary P. Roy P. O. Box 2184 100 Old Farm Road 80 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05407 South Burlington VT 05403 South Burlington VT 05403 Parcel 0573-00016 Parcel 0573-00014 Parcel 0573-00012 Michael J. & Bonnie S. O'Day Kevin J. & Mary R. Ransom Susi E. Taylor 16 Dover St. 14 Dover St. 12 Dover St. South Burlington VT 05403 South Burlington VT 05403 South Burlington VT 05403 Parcel 0573-00010 Parcel 0810-00177 Parcel 0860-00635 Michael D. & Trudy A. Haire Ronald J. & Barbara J. Lascala CPA Partnership 10 Dover St. 177 Hayes Avenue c/o Daniel J. O'Brien South Burlington VT 05403 South Burlington VT 05403 1855 Williston Road South Burlington VT 05403 Parcel 0860-00625 Parcel 0970-00110 Ralph B. & Ann j. Goodrich Cairns CD Irrevocable Trust P.O. Box 2123 Mobil R/E Tax Dept. South Burlington VT 05407 Box 290 Dallas TX 75221 00182:cross sheet adjoiners MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM \ 05-15-2001. 12:31:47 South Burlington / Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504POO.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 1 SELECTION FACTOR(S) FACTOR LOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT CONNECTOR 1 1815-OOOOOR 1815-99999R RECORD LISTING P a r c e 0 w n e r N a 0 w n e r 1 m A e d I d D --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 r 4608 1815-00032R WARD CHRISTINE E 4609 1815-00037R COURCY LISA 4612 1815-00044R FAUCHER MARC R & MARGARET A 4613 1815-00048R HORNER HARVEY E & ETHEL M 4614 1815-00053R RILEY BRYAN J & STACY E 4615 1815-00056R REDMOND DAVID A & MARIE C 4616 1815-00057R BLUMENSTEIN HAROLD I & RUTH 4617 1815-00058R DENUNZIO MICHAEL A & KIM M 4618 1815-00059R ALEXANDRIDES MARY A 4619 1815-00061R MARSDEN TERENCE J 4620 1815-00062R EVENSON CLAIRE E 4621 1815-00063R BUKO JOZEF MARIA & TERESKA 4622 1815-00064R BOHLEN PATRICIA J & WILLIAM C 4623 1815-00065R BALDI KEITH J & ANGELA M 4624 1815-00066R STAFFORD JUDITH E 32 WINDING BROOK 37 WINDING BROOK DR 44 WINDING BROOK DR 48 WINDING BROOK DR 53 WINDING BROOK DR 1422 MAIN ST 57 WINDING BROOK DR 58 WINDING BROOK DR 59 WINDING BROOK DR 61 WINDING BROOK DR 62 WINDING BROOK DR 63 WINDING BROOK DR 64 WINDING BROOK DR 65 WINDING BROOK DR 66 WINDING BROOK DR 4625 1815-00067R WALTERS ELIZABETH M 67 WINDING BROOK DR 4626 1815-00068R WITTE CHRISTINA 68 WINDING BROOK DR 4627 1815-00069R CASSANI KARA H69 WINDING BROOK 4628 1815-0007OR BUKO TERESKA J 70 WINDING BROOK DR 4629 1815-00071R BESSETT THELMA L & JAMES L TRU 71 WINDING BROOK DR 4630 1815-00072R HAAS ERNEST J & ELIZABETH L 72 WINDING BROOK DR 4631 1815-00073R HUTCHINS GINA A 73 WINDING BROOK 4632 1815-00074R BOILEAU MELISSA 74 WINDING BROOK DR 4633 1815-00075R GRIMES JEFFREY J & ELLEN B 75 WINDING BROOK DR 4634 1815-00076R WILSON JODIE M 76 WINDING BROOK 4635 1815-00077R LEMBCKE TRUST 47 BITTERSWEET LANE 4636 1815-00078R GEDDES MARGARET 78 WINDING BROOK DR 4637 1815-00079R DOLLARD EDWARD 725 SCOTLAND ST S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT ST JOHNSBURY VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT P r C o i p t Z y i / p L S o t C c a 0 a t d t e e n 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05819 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK BURLINGTON VT 05401 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK DUNEDIN FL 34698 WINDING BROOK 4638 1815-00080R SAWYER DEBORAH A 80 WINDING BROOK OR S )NGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4639 1815-00081R MACKENZIE LAWRENCE M & ELIZAL._ 81 WINDING BROOK OR S buKLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4640 1815-00082R GARDEN CATHERINE H 82 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4641 1815-00083R DESMOND JEANNE T 83 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4642 1815-00084R RICHER LISE M 84 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4643 1815-OOOAIR MILLER ROBERT J Al WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4644 1815-00OA2R NADON SALLY JEAN 2 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4645 1815-00OA3R DEACON SUSAN S 3 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4646 1815-00OA4R HAMEYER KLAUS BOX 41 WEST DANVILLE VT 05873 WINDING BROOK 4647 1815-00OA5R RAFTER NORBERT J 5 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4648 1815-00OA6R BOFFA CATHERINE V 6 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4649 1815-00OA7R CORSKIE JOHN J & THERESA M A7 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4650 1815-00OA8R BERKETT STEPHEN A & LORRAINE P 8 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4651 1815-00OB9R WATSON GEORGE E & RUTH H 9 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4652 1815-OOBlOR MAHANEY FREDERICK W & JANET BIO WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4653 1815-OOBlIR SCHLAK MARION L 811 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4654 1815-OOB12R GILLIGAN MICHAEL W 12 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4655 1815-OOB13R MIDDLETON GAIL A 13 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4656 1815-00814R PRICE WILLIAM W 14 WINDING BROOK OR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4657 1815-OOB15R AHEARN ERIN M 15 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4658 1815-OOB16R MURTIE AMARYLLIS G B16 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4659 1815-OOC17R WILSON JEAN P 17 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 5348 1815-OOC18R NASON FRANCES M 18 WINDING BROOK SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05401 WINDING BROOK 4660 1815-OOC19R HILL KATHLEEN J 19 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4661 1815-OOC20R DISANTO KATHERINE C C20 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4662 1815-OOC21R BIRNBAUM GEORGE & MURIEL C 176 COUNTRY CLUB DR FLORIDA NY 10921 WINDING BROOK 4663 1815-OOC22R MOEGELIN MARNE S P 0 BOX 9397 S BURLINGTON VT 05407 WINDING BROOK 4664 1815-OOC23R HURLBURT CAROL M 23 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4665 1815-OOC24R PERRAUDIN GEORGE & EVELYN 24 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4666 1815-OOC25R CANNING JOHN T 25 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4667 1815-OOC26R REDFIELD SCOTT T C26 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4668 1815-OOC27R MCCABE JOHN F & CLAIRE M 27 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4669 1815-COC28R STOCKER CAROL A 366 SOUTH COVE RD BURLINGTON VT 05401 WINDING BROOK 4670 1815-00029R SANDER DAVID A 29 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4671 1815-0003OR LEMIEUX GARY L 030 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 3 4672 1815-OOD31R MACHANIC COREY B D31 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK D 4673 1815-OOD33R BURNS PENILEE 33 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4674 1815-OOD34R NOKES JENNIFER J 34 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4675 1815-OOD35R ST GERMAIN MICHEL E D35 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4676 1815-OOD36R WRIGHT BRENDA 36 WINDING BROOK DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4677 1815-OCE38R BOUCHARD DEBORAH 38 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4610 1815-OOE39R MCGINNISS KATHERINE M 39 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4678 1B15-OOE40R BROOKS HEATHER L 40 WINDING BROOK OR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4679 1815-OOE41R ALLEGREZZA RICHARD & HANNELORE 336 CLAERWATER RD SHELBURNE VT 05482 WINDING BROOK 4680 1815-OOE42R THIBAULT KATHRYN ANN & VINCENT 97 OAKCREST DR BURLINGTON VT 05401 WINDING BROOK 4611 1815-OOE43R LUCAS THOMAS A E43 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4681 1815-OOF45R HILL SANDRA W 45 WINDING BROOK DR S INGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4682 1815-OOF46R REYES SERGIO J & SUSANA F46 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4683 1815-OOF47R POULOS PATRICIA 47 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4684 1815-OOF49R CLARAHAN SUSAN 49 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4685 1815-OOF50R DUFFY TERESA 50 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4686 1815-OOF51R NICHOLSON JOHN G & MARJORIE F51 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4687 1815-OOF52R PLOOF RICHARD E SR & BARBARA A F52 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4688 1815-OOG54R MCQUADE JOANNE P.O. BOX 9466 S BURLINGTON VT 05407 WINDING BROOK 4689 1815-OOG55R HANSEN JEAN L 55 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4690 1815-OOG60R WOOL MICHAEL W TRUSTEE P 0 BOX 721 BURLINGTON VT 05401 WINDING BROOK 84 records were listed MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM 1 05-15-2001. 12:31:49 f South Burlington / Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 2 SUMMARIES OF 84 RECORDS IN INDEX# 1 COL. FACTOR TYPE SUM MEAN STD.DEV. 1 1 Parcel ID STR 2 2 Owner Name 1 STR 3 4 Owner Addr STR 4 5 City/State STR 5 6 Zip Code STR 6 7 Prop. Locatn STR 11 MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM ) 05-15-2001. 12:33:47 y '•,' South Burlington n9 Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504POO.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 1 SELECTION FACTOR(S) FACTOR LOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT CONNECTOR 1 0160-OOOOOR 0160-99999R RECORD LISTING 0 w n O C P e w i a r n t Z r e y i c N r / p e a S 1 m A t C e d a 0 I d t d --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D I r e e 348 0160-00001R PIERCE NANCY HEALD 1 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 349 0160-00002R MURPHY G MARILYN 24 DUNLOP WAY COLCHESTER VT 05446 BAYBERRY LN 350 0160-00003R DODGE F WILL P 0 BOX 922 WILLISTON VT 05495 BAYBERRY LN 351 0160-00004R POTHIAWALA AMIN & PARVIN 31 WINTER LANE CIRCLE ESSEX JCT VT 05452 BAYBERRY LN 352 0160-00005R KINGSBURY GEORGE & JOAN 5 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 353 0160-00006R COOPER WENDY C H8 GRANDVIEW DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 354 0160-00007R PIERRO MARY A 180 MIDDLE NECK ROAD SANDS POINT NY 11050 BAYBERRY LN 355 0160-OOOOOR HACKETT JEANETTE M 8 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 356 0160-00009R SAVOIE JEFFREY M JEFFREY W 345 MEADOWRIDGE RD WILLISTON VT 05495 BAYBERRY LN 357 0160-OOOOOR ATWOOD ALM E 10 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 358 0160-00011R BRUNELLE ALISON C 11 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 359 0160-00012R ANGOLANO ANTHONY D 12 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 360 0160-00013R PROVETTO JAMIE A 13 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 361 0160-00014R GREEN DARRIN 14 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 362 0160-00015R AUBE JESSICA 15 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 363 0160-00016R ROORIGUE ANITA L & VONA B 16 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 364 0160-00017R WALSH ALLAN J 102 STIRUPP CIRCLE WILLISTON VT 05495 BAYBERRY LN 365 0160-00018R PERKINS DOUGLAS B & CHRISTINE 21 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 366 0160-00019R FORTIN ROBERT F & MARGARITE E 19 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 367 0160-00020R ARMSTRONG ALICE K & SAMUEL J 20 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 368 0160.00021R GEORGE LORRAINE C 21 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 369 0160-00022R GILLIAM LINDA 22 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 370 0160-00023R GEORGES FLORENCE G TRUSTEE 23 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 371 0160-00024R POLEY DIANE P 24 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 372 0160-00025R STEWART DALE 25 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 373 0160-00026R ROSSI-HOWARD FREDRICK J & MARG 26 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 374 0160-00027R MCLAUGHLIN JAMES P & CATHERINE 27 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 375 0160-00028R TUTTLE ANN M 28 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN P r 0 p L 0 c a t n 376 0160-00029R LIPSON DEBRA R 65 HIGH RIDGE ROAD #404 S RD CT 06905 BAYBERRY LN 377 0160-0003OR KING DEBORAH M 30 BAYBERRY LANE S bURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 378 0160-00031R LAWRENCE BARRY J 31 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 379 0160-00032R LOYER SANDRA L 34 EAST BIRCH LANE #2 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 380 0160-00033R BARNUM JESSICA A 33 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 381 0160-00034R GINSBURG CHARLES 34 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 382 0160-00035R BARRETT PENNY S 35 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 383 0160-00036R CARGILL GRAY 36 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 384 0160-00037R COOKE RUSSELL T 17 WHITE BIRCH LANE WILLISTON VT 05495 BAYBERRY LN 385 0160-00038R WALCOFF HARRY 161 AUSTIN DR BURLINGTON VT 05401 BAYBERRY LN 386 0160-00039R LAMELL RONALD R JR 82A JERICHO RD ESSEX JCT VT 05452 BAYBERRY LN 387 0160-0004OR PRICE LOIS 40 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 388 0160-00041R BEACH GI GI 41 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 389 0160-00042R SHKURKO EUGENE I 42 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 390 0160-00043R TITUS RALPH T BOX 113 SHELBURNE VT 05482 BAYBERRY LN 391 0160.00044R SHORTSLEEVES ELLA M 44 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 392 0160-00045R ADORISIO MARGARET D 45 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 393 0160-00046R GIFFORD CHARLES E 46 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 394 0160-00047R WALCOFF HARRY 161 AUSTIN DR #41 BURLINGTON VT 05401 BAYBERRY LN 395 0160-00048R BROCK FRANCES D 48 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 396 0160-00049R MORRIS JEANETTE T TRUSTEE E8 STONEHEDGE OR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 397 0160-0005OR WISEHART KAREN 50 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 398 0160-00051R BRADY GAYLE S 6243 SPEAR ST CHARLOTTE VT 05445 BAYBERRY LN 399 0160-00052R BENNETT MARY L 52 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 400 0160-00053R VAIL BURR & LINDA 53 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 401 0160-00054R MCKEE JAMES E 54 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 402 0160-00055R REED MARK 55 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 403 0160-00056R CECERE DONALD F & LORRAINE B 56 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 404 0160-00057R GORDON JAMES D 57 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 405 0160-00058R PENOYER PATRICIA A 58 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 406 0160-00059R BARRETT BRETT 374 PATCHEN RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 407 0160-0006OR TSAI FAMILY TRUST 120 TARBOX RD JERICHO VT 05465 BAYBERRY LN 408 0160-00061R KOENIG ANNELIESE K 61 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 409 0160-00062R BENOIT MARY E 62 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 410 0160-00063R YOUNG ARAM 63 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 411 0160-00064R SHORTSLEEVES PENNY 64 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 412 0160-00065R O'BRIEN PATRICK A & BETSY A 65 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 413 0160-00066R REINECKE RUDOLPH S & DELORES P 0 BOX 156 MONTPELIER VT 05601 BAYBERRY LN 414 0160-00067R PUGH ANN D 67 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 415 0160-00068R GUILLETTE MURIEL F 68 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 416 0160-00069R DOUGLAS BONNIE F 69 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 417 0160-0007OR BRADY ROSEMARY B 70 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 418 0160-00071R HEURTEMATTE DOUGLAS E 71 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 419 0160-00072R HUFF JOYCE 72 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 420 0160-00073R DELEON SUSAN P 73 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 421 0160-00074R DRURY FRANK R 74 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 11 MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM ) 05-15-2001. 12:33:50 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504Po0.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 2 SUMMARIES OF 92 RECORDS IN INDEX# 1 COL. FACTOR TYPE SUM MEAN STD.DEV. 1 1 Parcel IO STR 2 2 Owner Name 1 STR 3 4 Owner Addr STR 4 5 City/State STR 5 6 Zip Code STR 6 7 Prop. Locatn STR 422 0160-00075R SHELTRA MARLOWE ) 75 BAYBERRY LINE S )NGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 423 0160-00076R GOUIN CHRISTOPHER M 76 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 424 0160-00077R BOHEN LAWRENCE F & SALLY J 3325 HINESBURG RD RICHMOND VT 05477 BAYBERRY LN 425 0160-00078R POPE LYNNIA M & KURT W 78 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 426 0160-00079R ROUILLE SYLVIA J 79 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 427 0160-0008OR HILL CHARLES N & YON HUI 80 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 428 0160-00081R ALLEN ARCHIBALD J & ELIZABETH P 0 BOX 3009 BURLINGTON VT 05401 BAYBERRY LN 429 0160-00082R WALKER DOUGLAS L & DAWN P 82 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 430 0160-00083R CAMPER WAYNE G & PATRICIA ANN 83 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 431 0160-00084R JACOBS SANDRA E 528 4TH ST ENCINITAS CA 92024 BAYBERRY LN 432 0160-00085R BENNETT RUTH W 85 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 433 0160-00086R NOWAKOWSKI JASON P 86 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 434 0160-00087R MORSE DANIEL P 25 IRVING TERR APT 17 CAMBRIDGE MA 02138 BAYBERRY LN 435 0160-00088R DESARNO MARK T 88 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 436 0160-00089R PERRY LORRAINE E 89 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 437 0160-0009OR THABAULT PAUL L 4 MT VIEW COURT BURLINGTON VT 05401 BAYBERRY LN 438 0160-00091R RYAN JOANNE E 54 DUFFY RD MILTON VT 05468 BAYBERRY LN 439 0160-00092R JONES BRYANT D 92 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 92 records were listed MiCROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM ) 05-15-2001. 12:37:25 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 —Y i Property File: Y0504PD0.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 1 SELECTION FACTOR(S) FACTOR LOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT CONNECTOR 1 1680-OOOOOR 1680-99999R RECORD LISTING 0 w n 0 C P e w i a r n t Z r e y i c N r / p e a S 1 m A t C e d a 0 1 d t d --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D 1 r e e 4126 1680-00101R TAYLOR DANIEL M 101 SUGARTREE LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4127 1680-00102R ZANG DANIEL J 102 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4128 1680-00103R TOOF PAMELA S 103 SUGAR TREE LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4129 1680-00104R BUGBEE JESSE D & DAWN D 8 SOUTH BAY CIRCLE COLCHESTER VT 05446 SUGAR TREE LN 4130 1680-00105R GLAZER HARRIET 105 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4131 1680-00106R KOWALEWITZ LOUISE A 106 SUGAR TREE LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4132 1680-00107R PEET FREDERICK V 1 EXECUTIVE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4133 1680-00108R BEECHER BETSY A 108 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4134 1680-00201R HOLM-HANSEN AUDREY M 201 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4135 1680-00202R PEET FREDERICK W 1 EXECUTIVE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4136 1680-00203R LYON TRICIA A 203 SUGAR TREE LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4137 1680-00204R LAJUDICE PETER T 765 CHAPIN RD ESSEX JCT VT 05452 SUGAR TREE LN 4138 1680-00205R HOPKINS RUTH A 205 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4139 1680-00206R THIBAULT EDWARD 206 SUGARTREE LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGARTREE LN 4140 1680-00207R BOWEN FREDERICK C 1265 GREAT PLAIN AVE NEEDHAM MA 02192 SUGAR TREE LN 4141 1680-00208R CARMINATI JEAN M 208 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4142 1680-00209R METZ JOSEPH L 209 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4143 1680-0021OR DOBSON MARK C & CHRISTINE L 210 SUGAR TREE LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4144 1680-00301R YAGER CINDY 301 SUGAR TREE LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4145 1680-00302R PEET FREDERICK V 1 EXECUTIVE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4146 1680-00303R AUSTIN MARK D 303 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4147 1680-00304R OTTE PAMELA J 304 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4148 1680-00305R WITTER DEBORAH J 305 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4149 1680-00306R PEET FREDERICK V 306 SUGARTREE LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4150 1680-00307R BECKWITH EILEEN N 307 SUGARTREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4151 1680-00308R PFISTER WARREN W & KAREN H 21704 BRINK MEADOW LANE GERMANTOWN MD 20876 SUGAR TREE LN 4152 1680-00309R THOMPSON JEFF & CORINNE 309 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4153 1680-0031OR CROW THOMAS C & DEBORAH M 95 CHANDLER FARM RD STOWE VT 05672 SUGAR TREE LN P r 0 p L 0 c a t n 4154 1680-00401R STANDISH BRUCE J 401 SUGAR TREE LA IJINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4155 1680-00402R PORTER VERA R 402 SUGAR TREE LA S buRLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4156 1680-00403R RUSH PATRICIA A. 403 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4157 1680-00404R MONTGOMERY JOSEPH ROSS P 0 BOX 307 JERICHO VT 05465 SUGAR TREE LN 4158 1680-00405R HURLEY NANCY J 405 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4159 1680-00406R GRAHAM JEAN E 406 SUGARTREE LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 34 records were listed MiCROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM 05-15-2001. 12:37:26 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 2 SUMMARIES OF 34 RECORDS IN INDEX# 1 COL. FACTOR TYPE SUM MEAN STD.DEV, 1 1 Parcel ID STR 2 2 Owner Name 1 STR 3 4 Owner Addr SIR 4 5 City/State STR 5 6 Zip Code STR 6 7 Prop. Locatn STR MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM ' 05-15-2001. 12:34:40 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 1 tr€ SELECTION FACTOR(S) FACTOR LOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT CONNECTOR 1 0790-OOOOOR 0790-99999R RECORD LISTING 0 w n 0 C P e w i a r n t r e y c N r / e a S 1 m A t e d a I d t --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D 1 r e 1794 0790-00001R JEROME BARBARA J 1 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 1795 0790-00002R COOLIDGE CHRISTOPHER R 2 HAWTHORN CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 1796 0790-00003R LEFEBVRE GERMAINE V 3 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 1797 0790-00004R HOPKINS HEATH MICHAEL 4 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 1798 0790-00005R BAYNHAM WILLIAM P & MILDRED F 5 INDIAN HILL RD WESTPORT CT 1799 0790-00006R BARBER SARA A 6 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 1800 0790-00007R GLITMAN MATTHEW M P 0 BOX 438 JEFFERSONVILLE VT 1801 0790-00008R DELLER ANNA J 8 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 1802 0790-00009R WERPY ROGER A 9 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 1803 0790-0001OR SULLIVAN EUGENA L REVOCABLE TR 10 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 1804 0790-00011R MARTIN GARY R 1805 0790-00012R SCHEGERIN BARBARA M 1806 0790-00013R COOKE ALAN G & HILDEGARD A 1807 0790-00014R MINER RALPH R & JUTTA 1808 0790-00015R BAILEY LAURENA M 1809 0790-00016R BERGERON PAUL H 1810 0790-00017R FRENCH GLORIA F 1811 0790-0001SR SANSONE KELLY K 1812 0790-00019R PEIRCE MICHAEL D 1813 0790-0002OR SMITH TODD C & PATRICIA A 1814 0790-00021R PERKINS ALVERTA L 1815 0790-00022R BERNSTEIN KERRY & DENISE L 1816 0790-00023R ANTONIOLI DAVID A 1817 0790-00024R MARTIN JAMES EDWARD 1818 0790-00025R DREWNIAK FRANK P P.O. BOX 307 P 0 BOX 21 25 MCINTOSH AVE 14 HAWTHORN CIR 15 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 16 HAWTHORN CIR 17 HAWTHORN CIR 20 CASCADE COURT 19 HAWTHORN CIRCLE 20 HAWTHORN CIR 21 HAWTHORN CIR 32 SAM WARD RD 23 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 24 HAWTHORN CIR 25 HAWTHORN CIR JONESVILLE VT ST ALBANS VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT ESSEX JCT VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT UNDERHILL VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT 1819 0790-00026R DALEY KAREN L 26 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 1820 0790-00027R WARNER DAVID B 5 SILVER BOW TERRACE ESSEX JCT VT 1821 0790-00028R HWANG PAUL B & PAULA C 1399 BAY RIDGE CT SAN JOSE CA P r 0 p Z i p L 0 C c 0 a d t e n 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORNE CIRCL 06880 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05464 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05466 HAWTHORN CIR 05481 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05452 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05489 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHONR CIR 05452 HAWTHORN CIR 95120 HAWTHORN CIR 1822 0790-00029R BROWN TIMOTHY M 1823 0790-0003OR ORLEANS WILLIAM A 1 12 DOGGETT'S COAT PLACE / 84 CENTRAL AVE S )A SPRINGS NY, S BURLINGTON VT 12866 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1824 0790-00031R BILODEAU RICHARD T 1825 0790-00032R FARRINGTON DAVID C 1826 0790-00033R HANDY EARL A 1827 0790-00034R WINTER BENJAMIN H 1828 0790-00035R MULLIN KAREN P 0 BOX 1152 4788 SPEAR ST 33 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 34 HAWTHORN CIR 1073A HARDSCRABBLE RD 1829 0790-00036R DEERING CORINNE M 36 HAWTHORN CIR 1830 0790-00037R HARDY ROBERT A & VIRGINIA L 37 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 1831 0790-00038R GENZLINGER ROBERT BARRY & MAUR 80 BLACK LANTERN LANE 1832 0790-00039R COOKE RUSSELL T 147 WHITE BIRCH LANE 1833 0790-0004OR RICKER HOLLIS A 40 HAWTHORN CIRCLE 1834 0790-00041R SIMONEAU LOUIS A 41 HAWTHORN CIR 1835 0790-00042R MCKAY ROBERT & JANICE 72 CANNONBALL RD 1836 0790-00043R MCGRATH SEAN P 3 BUTLER DR 1837 0790-00044R SHERIDAN PATRICIA A 21 CAVENDISH COVE 1838 0790-00045R PEABODY ELIZABETH 45 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 1839 0790-00046R JASANY RICHARD A 46 HAWTHORN CIR 1840 0790-00047R BOWLES JOHN M & SUSAN E 47 HAWTHORN CIR 1841 0790-00048R MIERSE WILLIAM E 48 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 1842 0790-00049R RISING JOAN M 49 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 1843 0790-0005OR PIERCE POLLY A 50 HAWTHORN CIR 1844 0790-00051R LESKO ANDREW JR & GAIL A 51 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 1845 0790-00052R ROOP SUSAN H 17 MT VIEW ST 1846 0790-00053R STRAW ANNE E 53 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 1847 0790-00054R GRISE GARY D & KATHY L 101 CLAY POINT RD 1848 0790-00055R WOLBACH MARY L 18 EAST TERRACE 1849 0790-00056R MICHNIEWICZ STEVEN J & MARY E 56 HAWTHORN CIRCLE 1850 0790-00057R GORDON WILLIAM & CHRYSTAL L 57 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 1851 0790-00058R MILLER MARK L 58 HAWTHORN CIR 1852 0790-00059R VIGNE LITTA J 59 HAWTHORN CIRCLE 1853 0790-0006OR GRANGER NORMAN EDWARD 60 HAWTHORN CIR 1854 0790-00061R WANG ZHONG 0 & XIAN H 5708 0790-00062R LYNCH DEBORAH 1856 0790-00063R LACHANCE LOUISE L 1857 0790-00064R BURKE CATHERINE M 1858 0790-00065R HURD KENNETH J 1859 0790-00066R ARAGONA MICHELLE S 1860 0790-00067R TITUS RALPH T & PATRICIA A 1861 0790-00068R HURLBURT RICHARD C 1862 0790-00069R ORLEANS WILLIAM A 1863 0790-0007OR HANBRIDGE BRIAN 1864 0790-00071R LISCIO JOHN & JANET S 1865 0790-00072R PAGE GARY L & KRISTEN L 1866 0790-00073R HELM K JENNIFER 1867 0790-00074R CAMPBELL OLGA C 61 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 62 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 63 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 64 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 685 BEECHER HILL RD 66 HAWTHORN CIR BOX 113 68 HAWTHORN CIRCLE 84 CENTRAL AVE 70 HAWTHORN CIR 71 HAWTHORN CIR 72 HAWTHORN CIRCLE P 0 BOX 6 74 HAWTHORN CIR NEWPORT VT SHELBURNE VT S BURLINGTON VI S BURLINGTON VT BRISTOL VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT WILLISTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT WANAQUE NJ S BURLINGTON VT S HERO VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT MONTPELIER VT S BURLINGTON VT COLCHESTER VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT HINESBURG VT S BURLINGTON VT SHELBURNE VT S BURLINGTON VT SBURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT JEFFERSONVILLE VT S BURLINGTON VT 05855 HAWTHORN CIR 05482 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05443 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05495 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 07465 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05486 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05602 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05446 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 62 HAWTHORNE CI 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05461 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05482 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05464 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 11 1868 0790-00075R GODARD ALISON C 75 HAWTHORN CIR )INGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1869 0790-00076R SMITH COLIN A 76 HAWTHORN CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1870 0790-00077R HAMMOND MILTON A & NANCY S 77 HAWTHORN CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1871 0790-00078R NOLL CHRISTIAN 78 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1872 0790-00079R CALLEA CAROL A 79 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1873 0790-00080R SPRAGUE ANNE W 29 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1874 0790-00081R FISKE LEE C JR & PATRICIA A 58 PROCTOR AVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORNE CIR 8 1875 0790-00082R PIERRO MARY A 180 MIDDLE NECK ROAD SANDS POINT NY 11050 HAWTHORN CIR 1876 0790-00083R WILBER RICHARD M 83 HAWTHORNE CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1877 0790-00084R GAMSBY CAROL A 84 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1878 0790-00085R DINSMORE DAVID P & DEBORAH J 102 MAECK FARM RD SHELBURNE VT 05482 HAWTHORN CIR 1879 0790-00086R TAYLOR SUSAN A 86 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1880 0790-00087R CONDER DANIEL N & PATSY M 4201 EAST BAKERSFIELD ENOSBURG FALLS VT 05450 HAWTHORN CIR 1881 0790-00088R POIRIER BARBARA M 88 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1882 0790-00089R HATCH CARLOTTE H 91 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1883 0790-00090R DEMAG LINDA M 90 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S:BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1884 0790-00091R WONG BRIAN C 27 QUAIL COURT HAMBURG NJ 07419 HAWTHORN CIR 1885 0790-00092R CHARBONNEAU SCOTT C 92 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORNE CIR 1886 0790-00093R GOLDBERG AARON J TRUSTEE KINGS 233 PEARL ST BURLINGTON VT 05401 HAWTHORN CIR 1887 0790-00094R POWERS PATRICIA TRUSTEE 94 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1888 0790-00095R STEVENS ANDREW B 95 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1889 0790-00096R GRUVER ALYSSA 96 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 96 96 records were listed MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM 05-15-2001. 12:34:43 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 2 SUMMARIES OF 96 RECORDS IN INDEX# I COL. FACTOR TYPE SUM MEAN STD.DEV. 1 1 Parcel ID STR 2 2 Owner Name 1 STR 3 4 Owner Addr STR 4 5 City/State STR 5 6 Zip Code STR 6 7 Prop. Locatn STR MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM 05-15-2001. 12:40:36 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0204P00.600 South Burlington Commercial Report Page # 1 SELECTION FACTOR(S) FACTOR LOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT CONNECTOR 1 0860-006200001 0860-006200009 RECORD LISTING 0 w T P n C o r P e i t o a r t a p r A y A 1 c N d / c L e a d S r V o 1 m r t e a c e e a 2 a 1 a I s t i 9 u t ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D 1 s e p e e n 190 0860-006200001 H A M PROPERTIE 120 LEDGE RD BURLINGTON 05401 0.16 279100.00 620 HINESBURG ROAD 191 0860-006200002 FLEISCHER & JAC 620 HINESBURG R S BURLINGT 05403 0.16 144100.00 620 HINESBURG ROAD 192 0860-006200003 FLEISCHER JACOB 620 HINESBURG R S BURLINGT 05403 0.16 123600.00 620 HINESBURG ROAD 193 0860-006200004 J & S HOLDINGS 620 HINESBURG R S BURLINGT 05403 0.16 114100.00 HINESBURG RD 620 UNIT3D 194 0860-006200005 VERMONT RADIOLO 620 HINESBURG R S BURLINGT 05403 0.16 324600.00 HINESBURG RD 620 UNIT 2B 195 0860-006200006 VERMONT RADIOLO 620 HINESBURG R S BURLINGT 05403 0.16 243400.00 620 HINESBURG RD UNIT#1A 196 0860-006200007 VERMONT RADIOLO 620 HINESBURG R S BURLINGT 05403 0.16 126400.00 620 HINESBURG RD #2A-1 197 0860-006200008 VERMONT RADIOLO UNIT 2A KENNEDY S BURLINGT 05403 0.16 122700.00 620 HINESBURG RD UNIT#2A 198 0860-006200009 H A M PROPERTIE 120 LEDGE RD BURLINGTON 05401 0.16 193700.00 620 HINESBURG ROAD 9 records were listed 0 MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM 05-15-2001. 12:40:36 ' South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0204POO.600 South Burlington Commercial Report Page # 2 SUMMARIES OF 9 RECORDS IN INDEX# 1 COL. FACTOR TYPE SUM MEAN STD.DEV. 1 1 Parcel ID STR 2 3 Owner Name 1 STR 3 5 Address STR 4 6 City/State STR 5 7 Zip STR 6 111 Acreage NUM 1.440 0.160 0.000 7 138 Total Value NUM 1,671,700.000 185.744.438 78.747.250 8 2 Prop Locatn STR O=BRIEN BROTHERS Aeencv. Inc. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT July 9, 2001 Mr. Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer All Development Review Board Members Planning and Zoning Department City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Request for an increase in maximum height, O'Brien Home Farm Development. Dear Ray & all Boardmembers: Please consider this a formal request to allow us to construct two pitched roof multi family buildings to a height of 45 feet. This allowance is necessary for the following buildings: Lancaster Lane: Building #42 Building #44 These two buildings are designed as 12-plex's. There are three levels of living space above grade, and a parking garage below grade. The parking garage has been designed to park 16 cars, and will also house the dumpster and recycling bins as well as a bike rack. By allowing this design, we will be able to reduce the amount of surface parking (pavement), which in turn allows us to retain more green space. We also used the topography to our advantage in this design. As you can see from the enclosed cross section, the finished floor elevation of the first floor is several feet below the public street, therefore minimizing the perceived height of the structure. In other words, when one is standing on the bike path, his/her eye level will be equal to the second floor of this building. We have kept the setback from the public street to 40 feet (30 required) and enhanced the landscaping in this area as well. Enclosed are the building elevations as well as the cross section for your review. R ectf�ully submitted, Patrick O'Brien Project Manager Forest Park Realty Corp. O'Brien Family Limited Partnership 1855 Williston Road • P.O. Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 • (802) 658-5000 • fax 658-5002 e-mail: OBrienBros@aol.com HMO Planning Conamission.July 10, 2001 To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Juli Beth Hoover, Director of Planning & Zoning RE: July 10, 2001 Agenda Items Date: July 3, 2001 SCHEDULE (July 10' Agenda and Tentative Thereafter) TUESDAY, JULY 10TH 3. Discussion with City Attorney regarding conflicts of interest 4. Consider entering executive session to discuss litigation to which the City is a party 5. Discuss planning for City parks 6. Flag illumination: review consultant study and proposed zoning amendment 7. View protection overlay district: continued discussion and review of proposed zoning amendment TUESDAY, JULY 24TH • O'Brien Farm area site visit • Central District zoning, subdivision and Official Map changes • View Protection Overlay District changes TUESDAY, AUGUST 14TH • Central District zoning, subdivision and Official Map changes • O'Brien Farm area Official Map changes TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11TH • Public Hearing: Official Map changes • Public Hearing: Flag Illumination • Public Hearing: View Protection Overlay District • Public Hearing: Central District Agenda Items: Agenda Item #3 -- Discussion with City Attorney regarding conflicts of interest We will have a discussion with Joe McLean from Stitzel Page & Fletcher, the City's attorneys, regarding conflicts of interest and Planning Commission protocol in this area. Agenda Item #4 -- Consider entering executive session to discuss Duppstadt/VSLP case The Commission will need to consider entering executive session to discuss the Duppstadt/ Van Sicklen Limited Partnership appeal to the Environmental Board, to which the City is a party. The Vermont Open Meetings Law provides for public bodies to enter executive session for this specific purpose. IiI Planning Commission July 10, 2001 Agenda Item #5 -- City Park Planning One of the Planning Commission's jobs is to propose changes to the Official Map to do such things as designate future parks. Sooner rather than later, the Planning Commission needs to define a specific park area of roughly 7 to 8 acres in the vicinity of the proposed O'Brien subdivision between Kennedy Drive, Hinesburg Road, and Old Farm Road. Right now, there is a large, undefined circle on the Official Map in this area indicating a "future park" but not specifically where. The Comprehensive Plan calls for provision of a "neighborhood park" in this area, defined as: The focus is on informal active and passive recreation. It should be centrally located within its service area encompassing a 1/4 to 1/2 mile distance. It should be accessible by way of interconnecting trails, sidewalks, or low volume residential streets. 5 acres is considered the minimum size, 5-10 acres is optimal. Neighborhood Parks ar enot intended to be used for program activities that result in overuse, noise, parking problems, and congestion. It should achieve a balance between active and passive park uses. (p. 71) Attached is a map of the general area. A detailed memo on the potential population generation of the parcel that's under subdivision review is attached. I would like to set up a site visit for our next meeting, after which we should have an area surveyed so an Official Map amendment can be proposed. Agenda Item #6 -- Flag Lighting The Eagle has Landed! We have an analysis and a draft ordinance on nighttime flag illumination from Kathleen Ryan, who co -wrote the Chittenden County Lighting Manual. Kathy also met with Stuart Martin from WCAX regarding his situation. The draft ordinance and a sketch of what it's based on are attached at the end of this memo. The basic recommendations are: 1. Flags are limited to 60 SF and flagpoles to 35 feet (the existing limit) 2. One or two narrow -cone spotlights may be used. Kathy felt that in many if not most cases, two lights are entirely appropriate for flag lighting. 3. The provision for using two lights deals with changes in wind patterns. 4. Illumination on the flagpole is permitted; illuminating a flag from a wall -mounted light is not, because of the high probability of off -property impacts from wall -mounted lights. 5. The ordinance limits EITHER lumen power and flag -level illumination, based on readily available information from the lighting supplier. This offers applicants some options based on the type of effect they are looking for and the fixtures being used. 6. Lighting limits differ for "bright surroundings" (100 footcandles at the flag) and "dark surroundings" (50 footcandles at the flag). I would recommend "bright surroundings" be 2 AIEMO Planning Commission July 10, 2001 defined as those properties fronting on Shelburne Road, Williston Road, and Dorset Street north of Kennedy Drive. We will need to discuss this at the meeting. 7. Applicants will have to submit a simple lighting design plan including the location of adjacent or nearby roadways. The ordinance restricts any lights from putting glare or light output onto a roadway for safety's sake. Agenda Item #7 -- View Protection Overlay District I have re -drafted the View Protection Overlay District changes to reflect the conclusions of our site visit: 1. That the 20 homes within the Spear Street Ridge district (the Pheasant Way/Whateley Road area) located east and south of Deerfield Drive (please see attached) would require the most stringent controls, as additions in the mass of any of these houses would adversely affect the district; 2. That the homes within the district located west or "downhill" of Deerfield Drive do not require such strict controls as topography and other homes block nearly all of the view. The new draft does the following: 1. A waiver may be granted for a property in any of the view protection districts City-wide if the applicant can demonstrate that the entire construction, alteration or addition is fully screened by a topographic feature or building, and is no taller than the screening feature or building. 2. For those properties in the Spear Street Ridge district WEST of Deerfield Drive, the addition, construction or alteration simply cannot be any taller at any point than the highest point of the existing building. This is an effort to address City Council's concern and the original view protection study's focus on the amount of "mass" of buildings within the view protection district. The properties in this zone that are west of Deerfield Drive are blocked from view both by topography and by other buildings. Thus additional "mass" (dormers, additions, etc.) will not have the kind of adverse impact that it would in the area right along Spear Street and highly visible from the baseline. The draft may need more tweaking; see what you think. Action Items and Questions from Last Meeting: 1. City Center Zoning -Traffic and parking ceilings. I have been working with Roger Dickinson on this issue. Roger believes the PC is best to address parking requirements in the area, and not to deal with Vehicle Trip Ends (VTEs) in the master plan permit. Roger believes the local permitting would be most effective by focusing on parking needs and layouts, phasing for structured parking, and the design and capacity of the 9 South Burlington Planning&Zoning To: South Burlington Development Review Board South Burlington Planning Commission From: Juh Beth Hoover, Director of Planning & Zoning RE: O'Brien Farm Subdivision Date: July 5, 2001 cc: Patrick O'Brien Chuck Hafter, Bruce O'Neill, Sarah MacCallum, Ray Belair Steve Stitzel With part of the O'Brien property undergoing subdivision review, the issue of reserving public parkland in this area has arisen. The City's Official Map designates a general area on the O'Brien property as "proposed parks and open spaces." The City has some legal rights related to the purchase and development of these designated lands. However, in this case, the map only shows a general area rather than any specific lands. There is a clear need to provide for public parks in this area. This need is articulated in the Comprehensive Plan, which calls for a "neighborhood park" in this area, and the Capital Budget. The Comprehensive Plan defines a "neighborhood park" as being optimally between 5 and 10 acres, with a focus on "informal active and passive recreation" rather than the types of organized activities and sports that create more parking and usage demand. The City's adopted standard in the Capital Budget for parkland is 7.5 acres per 1,000 residents. Full build -out of the O'Brien parcel as currently zoned would support roughly between 949 and 1,044 new residents, which works out to a demand for about 7 to 8 acres of parkland. 1 have shown a calculation based on both the 2000 Census data for average household size in the City (2.31), and a smaller household size more typical for the type of multi -family units proposed. 2000 Max. # of Average HH Potential Smaller Potential Zoning Acres units size po ulation HH size pojEulation R-7 59.5 416 2.31 961 2.1 874 R-4 9 36 2.31 83 2.1 76 Total 68.5 452 2.31 1,044 2.1 949 1 MEMO South Burlington Planning & Zoning Standard for park Projected land per 1,000 Acres Household size population residents (acres) required Smaller size (2.1) 949 7.5 7.1175 2000 Census (2.31) 1,044 7.5 7.83 City Attorney Steve Stitzel and I would recommend the Planning Commission conduct a site visit to the property soon to determine what area that is not currently proposed for development would be most suitable for park land. The site visit would be conducted as a noticed public meeting, so anyone who would like to participate may do so. Once an area of roughly 7 to 8 acres has been designated, the City will survey the area and the Planning Commission will need to propose an Official Map amendment. The amendment process is the same as for zoning amendments, with Planning Commission holding a public hearing and forwarding the proposed change to City Council. If the Official Map change is made prior to final plat submittal by O'Brien Brothers, they will need to show the designated area on their submittals. Actual acquisition of the land will need to be negotiated between the City and the O'Brien Brothers. 2 KREBS & LANSING ............. .... CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. SHEE r NO. .... ........ .. ........ . ..... COL(tMain Street Ste. 201 fu" v -STER, VERMOUT 05446 (802) 878-4�475 Fax (802) $78-9618 ...... . .... ........ ....... .... .... -.- ...... TO'd -3 I-Aaq0'6 dZt,:2-1 rO--90-LnC' KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 164 Mair Sireet Ste. 201 COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 (802) 8780375 Fix (802) 878-9618 JCP---- 0-an ...... ..................... . ........ . . . .. ...... - a-lc-'r -_.._..._.A_..,_ (w , . . . .. ........ C AGALATED BY..—....._...... [WL — .... ...... . .. ................... 04C.CM-0 SY—__ . ................. .. . ......... ...... .......... nA7 E Nr A] L, ZO'd !9196-SL8-209 sq9aN '3 I-A8q0'8 d0C:21 tO-90-Lne 0MRIEN BROTHERS Agency, Inc. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT Narrative for Planned Unit Development of Lots 1 and 2 of The O'Brien Home Farm Development South Burlington, Vermont The O'Brien Home Farm Development is proposed as a Planned Unit Development. The land in the area of the development is zoned Residential District (7). Planned Unit Development is a permitted use in this zoning district. Lot 1 of the Home Farm Development includes 45 townhouse units on a 8.5 acre lot and Lot 2 includes 56 multi -family units on a 5.3 acre lot. Lot 3 is a .5 acre park with improvements to be dedicated to the City of South Burlington. Lot 4 is a 1.9 acre unimproved park to be dedicated to the City of South Burlington. There will also be approximately 2.8 acres dedicated to the City of South Burlington that will be improved to contain a paved road, curbs, bike path, drainage, water and sewer lines and street trees. The Home Farm Development has been designed to efficiently utilize the land, and is in general conformance with the following standards of Section 26.15 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Al) The multi -families will be designed to have two bedroom units, and the townhouses will be designed to have up to three bedroom units. The State of Vermont indicates the design water and sewer flow for a three -bedroom unit is 450 gal/day/unit and 300 gpd for a two -bedroom unit. Water saving devices allow the design flow to be reduced 10% to 405 gal/day/unit. Measurement of actual flows for three bedroom units indicate water and sewage flows of approximately 230 gal/unit/day and approximately 150 gal/unit/day for the two bedroom units. There are a total of 45 townhouse and 56 multi -family units. The design flow for these units would be 40,905 gallons per day. The sewer flow will likely average 18,750 to 20,000 gallons per day at full buildout. Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers met with the South Burlington City Engineer to discuss the capacity of the City sewage collection system. It was our understanding that the City has adequate capacity to treat the daily sewage flow but, there was concern that the sewage collection lines in the vicinity of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Drive might be close to capacity. 1855 Williston Road • P.O. Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 • (802) 658-5000 • fax 658-5002 e-mail: OBriinBros@aol.com Krebs and Lansing and Heindel and Noyes installed equipment to continuously monitor the sewer line flow at the intersection of Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive for a period of eight days. We made the following observations, and have submitted them to the City Engineer, Bill Szymanski, for his review. 1. The sewer pipe crossing Kennedy Drive has a 10" diameter, City records indicate an 8" diameter pipe. 2. The pipe flow rates range from approximately 9 gpm at night to 500 to 600 gpm flow rates during peak flow times. 3. The maximum flow rate recorded was 900 gpm (likely from simultaneous pump station discharges from adjacent developments). 4. Approximately 90% of the time the pipe carries less than 20% of its capacity and the pipe is carrying approximately 50% of its capacity during peak flow times. Based on a 16-hour day, the average flow from the O'Brien Home Farm Development is projected to be 21 gallons per minute. Using a peaking factor of 5, the peak flow rate is projected to be 105 gpm. Based on our continuous flow observations of the sewer collection pipe crossing Kennedy Drive, we estimate the pipe could flow at least 1200 gal/minute. The existing peak flows measure 500 to 600 gpm. Given this information, we feel the sewage flow from the O'Brien Home Farm Development will not have undue adverse affects on the South Burlington sewage collection infrastructure. (See results of continuous monitoring included as Attachment 1.) A2) The area of our project is not located in a flood plain. A3) A stormwater runoff analysis was performed on the proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm. The site was analyzed from Kimball Avenue on the north, Old Farm Road to the east, Hinesburg Road to the south and the condominium developments to the north. The site was analyzed utilizing the SCS TR55 stormwater model and Haestad Method Pond Pac version 7 for the 24-hour, 25-year pre development and post development conditions. The site was analyzed as 5 sub watersheds. With the use of stormwater treatment and retention structures, the following results were obtained for the 24 hour, 25 year storm event. Watershed Pre -Development Peak Runoff (cfs) 1 1.0 2 3.3 3 4.4 4 2.4 5 5_8 Total Pre -Development Runoff 16.9cfs Post Development Peak Runoff (cfs) 1.0 3.3 4.2 1.4 3.8 13.7cfs Total Post - Development Runoff Detention basins have been designed utilizing Vermont Best Management Practices for Treatment of Stormwater Runoff. The basins will collect and hold the first inch of 2 runoff for 24 hours. The basins will have provisions for them to remain wet utilizing sumps for polishing of stormwater. The development has been designed to provide treatment of stormwater runoff from much of the roads and parking via sheet flow over vegetated terrain. The downslope portions of the site will be banked by vegetated buffers and the 50-foot wide wetland buffers will not be disturbed. The construction plans for the project include temporary erosion control measures such as hay bale and silt fence barriers, stabilized construction entrance, re-establishing vegetation in disturbed areas as soon as possible, avoidance of wetlands and wetland buffers and ongoing inspection and maintenance of erosion control measures. (See Attachment 2 stormwater analysis and plans.) A4) We believe the proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm has been designed in conformance with all local and State regulations. B) The O'Brien Home Farm Development will require water for domestic use and fire flows. Based on a 16-hour delivery day, the average day demand for 45 townhouses and 56 multi -family units is estimated to be 35± gallons per minute. Using a peaking factor of 5, the peak flow rate is estimated to be 175± gpm. A desirable fire flow is estimated to be 1500 to 2000 gpm. South Burlington is fortunate to be well supplied by water from Champlain Water District. We are enclosing as Attachment 3, the results of hydrant flow testing in the area of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road which indicate the water system is capable of delivering 2500 to 3000 gpm flows to the area of the O'Brien Home Farm Development. See attached fire flow results. The proposed water line extension to serve the O'Brien Home Farm Development will provide an additional loop of the Kennedy Drive -Hinesburg Road water system which will reduce friction loss and serve to strengthen the already substantial water distribution system. C) The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm has been designed to control and direct stormwater runoff into detention basins that will treat and release the runoff at rates equal to or lower than pre -development stormwater runoff levels. The development will preserve all of the wetlands and their buffers shown on the site plan, and will provide a vegetated buffer strip on the down slope sides. Temporary erosion control measures will be established and maintained during construction. Permanent erosion control measures include establishing permanent vegetation, paving roads and parking lots and maintaining stormwater collection and treatment facilities. D) See Attachment 4, traffic report prepared by Roger Dickinson, P.E., Lamoureux Dickinson Consulting Engineers. E) See Attachment 5, letter from the South Burlington School District. F) We feel the proposed development of the proposed O'Brien Home Farm Development will not cause an unreasonable burden on the City of South Burlington to provide municipal or governmental services and facilities. The site is located close to the core of the City in an area designated for high -density development. The circulation roads serving the townhouse and multi -family units have been proposed as private roads minimizing municipal road maintenance on the site. The road to be dedicated to the City will be constructed to City standards; every effort will be made to minimize future maintenance costs to the City associated with this segment of road. The buildings and site will be designed to conform to all fire codes. The water system will provide adequate hydrants and the circulation road within the development will provide adequate circulation for emergency vehicles. The Applicant will submit the proposed design to the fire department for review and comments. The Applicant believes the project can be designed to restrict the risk of fighting fires or performing emergency rescue to acceptable levels. The site is located in close proximity to the core of the City in areas already patrolled by the South Burlington Police Department. Roads and road intersections will be designed in conformance with State and local regulations. The use of bus services to commute from the site is feasible and will contribute to less congestion. The design of bikeways and pedestrian connections will help to promote safe pedestrian circulation. The compact nature of the development will make routine police patrols quicker and easier. G) A design goal of ours has been to avoid important natural resources. Before any design work proceeded, the site was evaluated for wetlands, rare and endangered species, wildlife habitats and special features. See letter from Errol Briggs, Biologist (Attachment 6). The results of the evaluation indicated wetlands, and a small intermittent stream associated with a wetland, were important features. The design study employed was to identify a 50 foot wide buffer around the wetlands and stream and to leave the features and their buffers undisturbed (see site plans). H) The required landscape budget based on the south Burlington ordinance is $74,660.00. The plans indicate value exceeding this amount. The retention of vegetation in the natural open space areas will contribute additional value to the landscaping. Plants were chosen that are salt tolerant and disease resistant. No invasive plants are specified and plant material native to Vermont make up a large percent of the specified plants. Street trees are specified at 2" rather than 2.5" because of commercial availability but because of 35' spacing rather than the 60' spacing as required for subdivision streets, the cost and the aesthetics benefits will be greater (there are 77 street trees, 66 are required). Planned street trees are in a "greenbelt of 7 to 8 feet between the bike path and the curb and all tree pits will be three times the root ball. The linden tree has been proven to be reliably salt tolerant and they are spaced to accommodate street light spacing requirements. Grading has been held back along the north lot line adjacent to the Wellesley Grove Townhouses to retain as much of the existing vegetation as possible. Supplemental planting is proposed in this area to insure privacy of neighbors. The private side of the units adjacent to Hinesburg Road has been heavily screened with deciduous trees. Sixteen feet trees will screen the lower half of the units and afford relief from the 4 western sun. The apartment area is surrounded by existing vegetation to remain. Plantings are predominately shade trees to bring down the scale of the two and three story buildings and to provide amenity for the residents. Many flowering trees are introduced in the newly cleared open spaces formed by the buildings. We have employed the University of Vermont Archaeology Consulting program to perform a Phase 1 Archaeological Assessment of the site. The site plans show areas which have been identified as potentially sensitive. Unusual Spring weather conditions have delayed the Phase 1 investigation. If the Phase 1 investigation identifies a site, the design strategy will be to avoid it. If avoidance is not possible, the University of Vermont Archaeological Assessment Team will be employed to recover the artifact(s). I) This proposed project provides a diversity of open space and recreational opportunities. The open spaces consist of two separate but very similar forested natural areas that have intermittent streams and wetland. Both of these areas would provide a natural area recreation experience in a wooded setting in the middle of this densely populated area. The first open area would be sandwiched between Georgetown, Wellesley Grove and the Townhouse unit that we are proposing. This area is approximately 1.5 acres in size and would be owned by the homeowners association of the townhouse area. No development other than fencing next to Wesley Grove (at their request) is proposed. The second open area is between the apartment buildings and Windridge. This area is approximately 1.9 acres in size. We are proposing to donate this area to the City to be used as a low intensity mini park. Preliminary discussions with the Recreation Path Committee seemed to support a meandering unimproved footpath with intermittent sitting benches. The walking path would connect to the bike path. A second mini -park is also being proposed in front of the Townhouses along Hayes Avenue Extension. This park's main objective is to serve as a tot -lot, and associated play items such as saddle mates, as well as several benches for sitting/watching. This mini - park is adjacent to the proposed bike path, which will provide access t this new as well as the existing neighborhoods. J) The O'Brien Home Farm Development will provide a local street with a bike path, street trees, curbs and infrastructure constructed to South Burlington road standards connecting Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive. The street is partially located in a corridor identified by the City as a future street. The Applicant is working in conjunction with the State of Vermont's engineering consultant, McFarland Johnson, to design a safe and efficient entrance to Kennedy Drive from the development. The local street is proposed as an extension of Hayes Avenue to the south and will serve an important function to connect the pedestrian circulation between the existing developments on the south and east sides of Kennedy and Hinesburg Drives. K) The proposed extension of Hayes Avenue loops through land owned by the Applicants. Should there be consideration of future development by adjoining property owners or the City of south Burlington, provisions have been made to accommodate water services and stormwater services and a road profile not exceeding 10% can be provided. The Town Plan identifies a local street link from Hinesburg Road to Old Farm Road as desirable. The proposed extension of Hayes Avenue can accommodate that extension. L) Compliance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan The Applicants feel the proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm is in conformance with the following sections of the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan: Chapter III Comprehensive Plan Goals The proposed development will advance the goals of the open space preservation, protection of wetlands, provide public landscaping, and provide outdoor recreational facilities. The proposed development is located in an area which has been zoned for high -density residential use. The proposed development will be in an area already being used for compact urban development. The layout of the proposed development allows for compact urban densities while providing open space to protect adjacent wetlands and wetland buffers as well as provide land for public recreational use. The multi -family units and the townhouse units will provide quality housing which will be more efficient and use less land than single family housing. The proposed development will be located on or in close proximity to an existing Chittenden County Transportation Agency bus route which will encourage the use of cost effective, environmentally sound transportation to commute the work, shop or recreational activities. The proposed development will serve to extend a local street, a bikeway and water & sewer infrastructure into an area designated by the comprehensive plan as desirable for compact urban residential development. The development will also provide public recreational spaces, landscaping, protect open space, and is in general conformance with the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of South Burlington. Chapter IV Population The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm would result in the addition of 101 living units. From start to finish, the estimated time to complete the project would be 2.5 to 3.5 years. The estimated occupancy per unit is 2.3 persons. On a three-year buildout, this would result in a 97-person increase in the population in one year's time. This would represent slightly less than a .5% yearly growth in the South Burlington population. The comprehensive plan's stated objective is to limit population growth to 1.5% per year to promote a vital and healthy community. Chapter V Land Use The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm is in an area shown on Map 6 of the future land use plan to be high density residential use. The proposed development utilizes an average density of seven units per acre and is consistent with the plan's future land use pattern generally consisting of a higher density, compact urban core. Chapter VI Housing This proposed development will offer housing opportunities for people of various income levels, age, household size, and mobility. The proposed development provides a close to equal mix of rental (54) vs. owner occupied (45) units. Each area will also provide a variety of housing types. The rental units will consist of four 8-plex's with detached garages and two 12-plex's with underground garages. The owner occupied units will be of the townhouse style and the existing grade of the site will allow three different elevation types to be built. Those types will include a walkout basement, a slab on grade or a basement garage with living levels above. Most units will also have options that include: a third bedroom, a den, an office for home occupation, a finished basement, and a two -car garage. Chapter IX Natural Resources Areas of wetlands have been identified on the O'Brien Home Farm. The wetlands and their buffers were identified before any design of the O'Brien Home Farm commenced. The proposed development avoids the wetlands and their buffers. This design study is consistent with the comprehensive statement that ... special care needs to be taken so that the remaining wetlands are carefully protected.... The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm will include stormwater retention and treatment basins to treat stormwater using best management practices recommended by the State of Vermont before discharging stormwater into the watershed. In addition, vegetative buffers will be maintained along the downslope side of the development and temporary and permanent erosion control measures will be employed during construction of the development. Chapter X Recreation The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm will provide the public with a tot lot mini park and a passive recreation mini park. The development will also provide a public bikeway from Kennedy Drive to Hinesburg Road and access easements for the mini park. These facilities are consistent with the comprehensive plan's goal... to provide for varied recreational needs and interests of its citizens by providing areas and facilities for passive recreation, active sports, cultural and educational programs... Chapter XI Path System The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm will provide a pedestrian/bicycle trail connecting Kennedy Drive to Hinesburg Road along the corridor defined on Map 2 of the comprehensive plan. Chapter XII Transportation The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm is adjacent to an existing Chittenden County Transportation Authority bus route. The project plans include bus stops along the proposed expansion of Hayes Avenue. The close proximity of the development to the City core will encourage residents of the development to use the bus to commute to work, shopping and recreation. The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm will include a bicycle/pedestrian corridor from Kennedy Drive to Hinesburg Road, helping to enhance a more pedestrian friendly environment for residents of the Home Farm and surrounding developments. The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm proposes the construction of a local road. This road will be designed for low speed use, and is proposed as the northeasterly extension of Hayes Avenue. The proposed road has been designed to allow a connection to Old Farm Road as shown by Map 3 of the South Burlington comprehensive plan. Chapter XVI Energy Conservation The units proposed for the O'Brien Home Farm will be designed and constructed utilizing guidelines and recommendations from Energy Rated Homes of Vermont. The compact nature of the proposed development compared to a single family house development will create significant energy savings by lowering the surface are of roofs and walls exposed to the cold by approximately 50%. There are additional energy savings in less maintenance of lawns, driveways, and area lighting because the Home Farm Development will occupy approximately 14 acres of land. A single-family development with the same number of units would occupy 25 to 50 acres of land. The close proximity of the Home Farm Development to the City core should result in savings of energy costs for gasoline. Residents will be able to use the bus, bike and walk to work, school, shopping and recreation. SOUTH BURLINGTON RECREATION DEPARTMENT 575 DORSET STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 TEL: (802) 846-4108 • FAX: (802) 846-4101 BRUCE O'NEILL, CLP DIRECTOR THOMAS HUBBARD, CLP ASS'T DIRECTOR TO: Development Review Board FROM: Recreation Path Committee RE: O'Brien Brothers Development DATE: November 16, 2000 The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee at its meeting on November 6, 2000 reviewed the plans for the O'Brien Brothers Development. The committee would like to insure that there would be a safe crossing from the path proposed along the Collector Road in the development, across Kennedy Drive, to connect with the existing path. Another of the Committee's goals is to connect the Kennedy Drive path to the path proposed to run along Kimball Avenue at Technology Park. This may involve the O'Brien property at a future date. This connection is vital as the City has an easement in Technology Park that will allow for the crossing of Muddy Brook to connect with Williston. A study is currently underway with the two communities to determine the best location for such a crossing. MEMBER: VERMONT RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION - NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION I UBRIEN BROTHERS Azencv, Inc. ) <-&, - 3 �, REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT Mary Beth Hoover, Town Planner Development Review Board Members City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mary Beth & all Boardmembers, May 22, 2001 City o f So. Burlington Enclosed you will find all of the required criteria for this six lot subdivision and 101 unit development. You will also find various items that are not specifically requested but nevertheless important when creating a project of this scale. As you may know, my brother Leo Jr. and I have owned this property for many years. In our earlier years we ran a successful dairy farm operation from the barn on Old Farm Road. Back then, the meadow that is proposed for this development was in crop rotation and the wooded section that is proposed for this development was pastureland. In more recent years, my nephew Leo 111 has harvested the hay from this meadow and the wood lot has been left to grown up into a forest, which now consists mainly of eastern white pine. After much discussion between Leo and I we decided to pursue the development of this portion of the home farm. Once that decision was made, we decided to utilize the professional services of Terry Boyle and his associates to work with us to come up with the conceptual plan that we submitted to you for sketch plan review. Since that review, we have continued to work closely with Terry, as well as Mike Burke of Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers to bring the conceptual plan into what we have presented you with today. We have also met with the neighbors to hear their concerns on three occasions and hope to meet with them once again before this next meeting. We have chosen Roger Dickinson of Lamoureux & Dickinson to do the traffic analysis and Bill Countryman and associates to do the wetland analysis. Their assessments are enclosed for your review. As you will see, we do take the environment very seriously when developing all of our projects. In fact, our development company (O'Brien Brothers Agency Inc.) has won the very prestigious "environmental excellence " award for two years in a row for residential subdivisions in Jericho and Shelburne. We worked very hard to earn these very significant awards and we hope to win with this project as well. The awards are given by the Home Builders and Remodelers Association of Northern Vermont whose membership includes most of the developers in Chittenden County. Due to the number of subdivisions that have been built or have been under construction in the past two years, winning these awards, back to back was even more gratifying. My nephew Patrick O'Brien, is the project manager for this project. He has been working with Leo and I at O'Brien Brothers Agency for over ten years, and does the majority of the development work for us. Please consider this a formal notification that he is hereby granted permission to apply for and present to you any and all information that is needed for the permitting of this project. Reectfully s m ed, Daniel J. O'Brie 1855 Williston Road • P.O. Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 • (802) 658-5000 • fax 658-5002 e-mail: OBrienBros@aol.com DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 NOVEMBER 2000 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 21 November 2000, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; R. Farley, G. Quimby, J. Cameron, G. Chamberland, E. Schmitt Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; N. & J. Moreland, P. Brody, Leo, Stephanie, Patrick and Maureen O'Brien, A. Voldman, J. Carris, P. Brogna, D. Burke, T. Sheppard, J. Wulfson, C. Barnard, R. Claveloux, M. Krahn, K. Perrotte, R. Stevens, G. Stevenson, B. McKnight, F. & A. Hiltz, C. Cerasoli 1. Other Business: No issues were raised. 2. Minutes of 17 October 2000: Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 17 October 2000 as written. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Mr. Cameron abstaining. 3. Sketch Plan application #SD-00-54 of Daniel O'Brien and Leo O'Brien, Jr., for a planned unit development in which two lots totaling 60 acres are subdivided into 6 lots where lots 1, 2, 3 & 4 total 19.1 acres and lots 5 & 6 total 49.9 acres. The planned unit development will result in: 1) lot one developed with 46 multi -family residential units in 15 buildings; 2) lot 2 developed with 64 multi -family residential units in 7 buildings; 3) an undeveloped lot (lot 3); 4) a community park (lot 4); 5) a remaining lot including the existing buildings located at 200 Old Farm Road (lot 5); and 6) a remaining lot including the existing buildings located at 255 Kennedy Drive (lot 6), 200 Old Farm Road and 255 Kennedy Drive: Patrick O'Brien presented the plan. He showed a plan of the entire property, color coded to indicate the lots that are proposed for development and the proposed park area. He also indicated the lot that will not be developed. Mr. O'Brien then reviewed the staff comments. The location of the project is within the R-7 and R-1 districts. All proposed development is in the R-7 district. The plans meet the frontage requirements and minimum lot sizes. The maximum density allowed is 113. The plan proposes 110. Mr. O'Brien noted that the density from lots 3 & 4 is included for this density. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 NOVEMBER 2000 PAGE 2 The plan proposes a collector road from Kennedy Dr. to Hinesburg Rd. It would be 32 ft. wide. The proposed park is approximately 1 acre. At preliminary plat, the applicant will address proposed facilities and ownership of the park. They have gotten feedback from Bruce O'Neill and will work with the Recreation Dept. on this. At preliminary plat they will also submit information from the School Superintendent. The plan provides for street lights on all public streets. All utilities details will be given at preliminary plat. Mr. O'Brien noted receipt of a letter from Bill Szymanski regarding an 8" line to serve the project. Street names will also be provided at preliminary plat. The applicant's current thinking is that the collector road would be a public street. There will have to be discussion on the look road in relation to the nature of the park. The plan proposes a 22 ft. road. Mr. Szymanski says it should be 24 ft. Mr. Belair noted that it was his understanding that the park would be private. The official city map shows a large public park. A one -acre park does not meet this requirement, but it could meet the needs of this proposed development. A representative of the Rec Path Committee said lot #3 would be a good location for public amenities (benches, etc.). The Committee has no plans for any future large public park there. The allowable building coverage is 20%, and the plan proposes 10.7-io. Total allowable coverage is 40%, and the plan proposes 36.3%. Some setback waivers might be needed. Mr. O'Brien showed where these might be located. The applicant will do a traffic impact study. Mr. O'Brien noted that the access to Rd. 116 has been designed to come out opposite Hayes Ave. A landscape schedule will be provided at preliminary plat. They will also show screening and the location of dumpsters at that time. Mr. O'Brien said they are aware of impact fees. Mr. O'Brien indicated that they will meet or exceed all parking requirements. It was noted that the Rec Path Committee had a few questions. One involved a safe crossing issue. Mr. O'Brien said they feel signage and striping will be necessary (similar to Swift/Spear). The applicant agreed to work with the Committee on a link to Williston. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 NOVEMBER 2000 PAGE 3 With regard to wetlands, Mr. O'Brien said they are currently delineating to see where wetlands are located and what type they are. This information will be provided at preliminary plat. Mr. O'Brien noted that the official city map shows a city street connection at Hinesburg Rd./Old Farm Road. He showed where the road would go and noted that they would build "jogs" into the road so it doesn't become a speedway. Elevations and building details will be provided at preliminary plat. There is only one area where height may be an issue and that is where some 12-plexes are proposed. A member of the audience asked about the time -line for the project. Mr. Dinklage explained the approval process. The same audience member then asked about drainage and traffic and noise. She noted that traffic has become a serious issue. Mr. Dinklage said that drainage will be addressed at the next hearing. He noted that the area is zoned for this density but the Board will be concerned that accesses are safe. Audience members suggested provisions for special left turn lanes. Ms. Stevenson said she lives in the most affected unit and is overwhelmed. She felt the drawings vastly overstate the green space. She said it is at most 10 ft. of brush. She wanted to see a lot of buffering. Mr. Dinklage said the Board will pay a lot of attention to that. An audience member noted there is a category 3 wetland identified by uie state between Wellesley Grove and Georgetown. This is a small stream bed. A buffer is required by the state and also by the city. There are on the Act 250 map. An audience member asked for a lot of trees because of proximity to the Airport, etc. Ms. Voldman expressed concern with traffic, particularly with the safety of access onto Old Farm Rd. and Hinesburg Rd. There has also been a tremendous increase in noise in the last few years and she was worried that taking down the trees will increase noise even more. She suggested some berming. Mr. Perrotte presented a letter from Rev. Myra Swanson who could not be present at the meeting. Rev. Swanson said she had been told that the land was a wetland and could not be developed. Ms. Barnard cited traffic problems and presented a letter from Pat Lilienthal regarding traffic and the cutting of trees. Ms. Moreland asked about a sidewalk on Hinesburg Rd. and/or Kennedy Drive. Mr. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 NOVEMBER 2000 PAGE 4 Belair said there is no sidewalk plan for the city, but the Public Works director will be working on one this winter. Ms. Moreland said there is a sidewalk on the Windridge property and there is no reason there can't be one along the whole strip. She also noted the very treacherous crossing on Kennedy Drive if there is a rec path there. She felt the only safe thing was a crosswalk and signal. Mr. Belair said the Board can ask the developer to put in traffic calming devices as part of this plan, but this can't be done on Kennedy Dr. or Hinesburg Rd. Mr. Hiltz noted that southbound traffic on Kennedy Dr. got easier with the additional turn lane. He suggested that for this project. Mr. Hiltz also raised the question of drainage and noted there have been erosion problems at Wellesley Grove. He felt this would get worse with this project. Mr. O'Brien said the stormwater analysis is not yet done, but he stressed that there will be no more water leaving this site than there is today. Ms. Moreland asked how traffic will be handled if the park is public. Mr. O'Brien said it was not intended for people from one side of town to drive to this park. There are 20 parking spaces provided. Mr. Carris of the Rec Path Committee said eventually the path will go on Kimball Ave. to Williston. He said he would like to see a rec path or sidewalk on one side of Kennedy Dr. Mr. Cerasoli added to concerns about a buffer and traffic/noise. He noted that Wellesley Grove will be surrounded by major roads. An audience member asked how density can be called "appropriate" when the nature of the land has not been considered. Mr. Dinklage said "appropriate" means what is allowed by the Zoning Regulations. A resident asked if setbacks can be increased where the development abuts a neighboring development. Mr. Dinklage asked the developer to meet with neighbors to address concerns. 4. Final Plat Application #SD-00-58 of Fairway Estates to amend a planned residential development consisting of 297 residential units and an 18 hole golf course. The amendment consists of combining 14 single family lots into one lot and constructing eleven duplex units and one single family dwelling for a total of 9 additional units resulting in 306 unlby total in the development, Economou Farm Road: Mr. Burke said this is the same plan as approved on 3 October. He noted that the landscape amount listed as $70,025 should be $35,675. -77 c coCV80 f .. 1 c v� n �� L So i3c� 1� << \� V e u�cr�c7N� re c t,) L l Vo t i c cxk a-e�� Sl r-\ La vS«S C7�� �c nrn l�S �� �O c.0 CCu M�GNL� �-Lut_ k` mcs o'- G�.'re� ��.c•.� t�� `.� S 2 � v LV'o ��C o � p-� creaSC"� i�S own Ct) mo �ticl c�vw�� . 03CAI-V %to \ t V 2 �c rc , /4 (o 0 4 " ,� ec, �1� cJc•�n,4- �o +\bLo,1�c 4 (� t t � m t- ��v e.\ wl C,rne r` 4 � Sc) I3c au c ll�F c ' s V' V. re._. ► /end t'�- +(ZCLA- to c S clod now, �-c,-Lv\- W c't l q— t Su c �t y lc- 4cx> (OL - . Z lLru c,J �ou C\ccx � Uc _ (Ji ScOCYN ? �U5� Wr���"� Go�vc� h1..., �-1,.A�s�1► S, T n� �ov S 4 f-I to-M.-I SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (302) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 July 1, 2001 Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 RE: O'Brien Home Farm South Burlington The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the preliminary plats for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. All construction drawings and plans shall have a note saying "All work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District, the City of South Burlington, and the Village of Jericho. 2. All water lines located under the proposed 8' recreation path should instead be placed between the recreation path and curbing. This will eliminate any possibility of damage from, or danger of gate valve boxes to recreational users. 3. Tee intersections shall have a minimum of three (3) gate valves. Additional valves shall be placed at Stonington Circle and Lancaster Lane. 4. A second 8" water main shall be inszalled' on Stonington Circle to supply a loop for this development. This will, help. ensure adequate supply and pressure to the system. This line should be located on the northeast entrance of Stonington Circle. 5. Eight -inch water pipe shall have no less than three (3) brass wedges installed at each joint. 6. All hydrants shall meet the aforementioned specifications, and a hydrant flag shall be supplied with each hydrant. Hydrant drains shall have all drains plugged prior to installation. 7. The hydrants and water lines located on Stonington Circle and Lancaster lane shall be considered private and subject to all associated fees and charges. At this time the City of South Burlington charges, all private hydrant owners $100 annually for each private fire hydrant. The SBWD shall continue to carry on its practice of overseeing the repair and maintenance of all water mains and appurtenances outside the City ROW. Work performed outside the ROW shall be charged to the owners of the project for time and materials when associated with any maintenance, outside of routine, and repairs. 8. The six-inch (6") gate valves to each of the multi -family units on Lancaster Lane shall be connected to 8"x8"x6" anchor tees and not be in -line valves as they are currently shown. 9. A short section of copper tubing and temporary plug shall be installed at the end of each curb stop. This section shall be removed when the line is extended into the house, thereby eliminating any joints or connections in the service line. 10. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances and water line crossings. 11. Details shall be modified to be those from the above referenced specifications. Specifically, concrete shall not be poured under any gate valves. Instead the valves shall be encased in crushed stone, per the specifications. 12. Fire hydrants may also be Waterous Pacer. 13. This department shall be notified of any changes to this project with revised, updated hard copy plans sent directly to us for further review. 14. Further changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. 15. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. 16. For one year from the date the new system is placed into service, the applicant, or developer shall be responsible for any necessary repairs or corrections. At the end of a one-year period, this department will perform an inspection. The applicant shall correct any punch list items accumulated during this inspection after the receipt of this list. Incomplete work on the system shall not be included in the initial inspection, but shall be inspected as the project continues. Final acceptance, after the one-year warranty period, shall not take place until the As- Builts have been received and all required improvements have been satisfactorily completed. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, 7 /yyNadeau Superintendent CC. Sara MacCallum South Burlington School District Attachment 5 Act 250 School Impact Questionnaire for Residential Projects Applicant to Complete: Applicant Name: n' roan Rrothprc Agenry frin Municipality: Sowth Burlington Number of Lots or Units: 101- Hayes Ave/Hinesburg/Kennedy Estimated Number of Students: 56 multi -family units x 2 bedrooms=112 x .1313=1a.71 45 townhouse x 3 bedrooms= 135 x2625 F 35.43 Totals 50.14 School Superintendent or Equivalent to Complete: What schools under your supervision will provide educational services for families who will live in this project? Elementary School: Chamberlin Middle School: FHTMS High School. SBHS Do these schools have the capacity to accept the additional students listed above? (assume equal grade distribution) _-Yes or No If "no," what is the deficiency? While at the present time the school district can accommodate the additional stadents projected by this individual project, the concern for the School District is with the cumulative impact of prior and continuing development in our community and the District's capacity to serve the students. This project, coupled with previous projects from last year and current requests, may cause the district to accelerate the year where the maximum capacity is reached, necessitating construction of it new facility. The passing of Act 60 adds additional concerns regarding development and developments impact on the tax Nate. Construction aid for schools are now placed on a priority listing that would appear to matte it difficult fur So. Burlington to gain aid in a timely fashion to meet impending capacity needs if development would continue at the accelerated pace of the past two years. Any construction costs that are not offset by revenues other than property tax would further penalize our communities by increasing our above block cost for students and the corresponding taxes that would be raised and sent to the sharing pool. What plans are in place to correct the problem:' Impact fees will serve to recapture space and renovate them into useable classrooms. District Offices will rent/build space outside of school facilities, If plans exist, how could this applicant help achieve those plans beyond adding new homes to the grand list? It is recon-urnended that South Burlington continue to balance its growth between business and housing. Do you have other comments? See above I certify the above information is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Marilyn Fccderick Name Business Managcr Position 2-22-01 Date Are you available, after sufficient notice, to answer questions related to the above statements at an Act 250 hearing? X Yes or No ,,, , 1 �. STJ MEMO South Burlington Planning & Zoning To: South Burlington Development Review Board South Burlington Planning Commission From: Juli Beth Hoover, Director of Planning & Zoning RE: O'Brien Farm Subdivision Date: July 5, 2001 cc: Patrick O'Brien Chuck Hafter, Bruce O'Neill, Sarah MacCallum, Ray Belair Steve Stitzel With part of the O'Brien property undergoing subdivision review, the issue of reserving public parkland in this area has arisen. The City's Official Map designates a general area on the O'Brien property as "proposed parks and open spaces." The City has some legal rights related to the purchase and development of these designated lands. However, in this case, the map only shows a general area rather than any specific lands. There is a clear need to provide for public parks in this area. This need is articulated in the Comprehensive Plan, which calls for a "neighborhood park" in this area, and the Capital Budget. The Comprehensive Plan defines a "neighborhood park" as being optimally between 5 and 10 acres, with a focus on "informal active and passive recreation" rather than the types of organized activities and sports that create more parking and usage demand. The City's adopted standard in the Capital Budget for parkland is 7.5 acres per 1,000 residents. Full build -out of the O'Brien parcel as currently zoned would support roughly between 949 and 1,044 new residents, which works out to a demand for about 7 to 8 acres of parkland. I have shown a calculation based on both the 2000 Census data for average household size in the City (2.31), and a smaller household size more typical for the type of multi -family units proposed. 2000 Max. # of Average HH Potential Smaller Potential Zoning Acres units size population HH size population R-7 59.5 416 2.31 961 2.1 874 R-4 9 36 2.31 83 2.1 76 Total 68.5 452 2.31 1,044 2.1 949 ,South Burlington Planning & Zoning Standard for park Projected land per 1,000 Acres Household size population residents (acres) required Smaller size (2.1) 949 7.5 7.1175 2000 Census (2.31) 1,044 7.5 7.83 City Attorney Steve Stitzel and I would recommend the Planning Commission conduct a site visit to the property soon to determine what area that is not currently proposed for development would be most suitable for park land. The site visit would be conducted as a noticed public meeting, so anyone who would like to participate may do so. Once an area of roughly 7 to 8 acres has been designated, the City will survey the area and the Planning Commission will need to propose an Official Map amendment. The amendment process is the same as for zoning amendments, with Planning Commission holding a public hearing and forwarding the proposed change to City Council. If the Official Map change is made prior to final plat submittal by O'Brien Brothers, they will need to show the designated area on their submittals. Actual acquisition of the land will need to be negotiated between the City and the O'Brien Brothers. 2 SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Paris Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 July 1, 2001 Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 RE: O'Brien Home Farm South Burlington The South Burlington. Water Department has reviewed the preliminary plats for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. All construction drawings and plans shall have a note. saying "All work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District, the City of South Burlington, and the Village of Jericho. 2. All water lines located under the proposed 8' recreation path should instead be placed between the recreation path and curbing. This will eliminate any possibility of damage from, or danger of gate valve boxes to recreational users. 3. Tee intersections shall have a minimum of three (3) gate valves. Additional valves shall be placed at Stonington Circle and Lancaster Lane. 4. A second 8" water main shall be installed: on Stonington Circle to supply a loop for this development'. This will help ensure adequate supply and pressure to the system. This line should be located on the northeast entrance of Stonington Circle. 5. Eight -inch water pipe shall have no less than three (3) brass wedges installed at each joint. 6. All hydrants shall meet the aforementioned specifications, and a hydrant flag shall be supplied with each hydrant. Hydrant drains shall have all drains plugged prior to installation. 7. The hydrants and water lines located on Stonington Circle and Lancaster lane shall be considered private and subject to all associated fees and charges. At this time the City of South Burlington charges, all private hydrant owners $100 annually for each private fire hydrant. The SBWD shall continue to carry on its practice of overseeing the repair and maintenance of all water mains and appurtenances outside the City ROW. Work performed outside the ROW shall. be charged to the owners of the project for time and materials when associated with any maintenance, outside of routine, and repairs. 8. The six-inch (6") gate valves to each of the multi -family units on Lancaster Lane shall be connected to Vx8"xC' anchor tees and not be in -line valves as they are currently shown. 9. A short section of copper tubing and temporary plug shall be installed at the end of each curb stop. This section shall be removed when the line is extended into the house, thereby eliminating any joints or connections in the service line. 10. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances and water line crossings. 11. Details shall be modified to be those from the above referenced specifications. Specifically, concrete shall not be poured under any gate valves. Instead the valves shall be encased in crushedstone, per the specifications. 12. Fire hydrants may also be Waterous Pacer. 13. This department shall be notified of any changes to this project with revised, updated hard copy plans sent directly to us for further review. 14. Further changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. 15. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format. or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. 16. For one year from the date the new system is placed into service, the applicant, or developer shall be responsible for any necessary repairs or corrections. At the end of a one-year period, this department will perform an inspection. The applicant shall correct any punch list items accumulated during this inspection after the receipt of this list. Incomplete work on the system shall not be included in the initial inspection, but shall be inspected as the project continues. Final acceptance, after the one-year warranty period, shall not take place until the As- Builts have been received and all required improvements have been satisfactorily completed. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, /ayNadeau Superintendent CC. Sara MacCallum DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 NOVEMBER 2000 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 21 November 2000, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; R. Farley, G. Quimby, J. Cameron, G. Chamberland, E. Schmitt Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; N. & J. Moreland, P. Brody, Leo, Stephanie, Patrick and Maureen O'Brien, A. Voldman, J. Carris, P. Brogna, D. Burke, T. Sheppard, J. Wulfson, C. Barnard, R. Claveloux, M. Krahn, K. Perrotte, R. Stevens, G. Stevenson, B. McKnight, F. & A. Hiltz, C. Cerasoli 1. Other Business: No issues were raised. 2. Minutes of 17 October 2000: Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 17 October 2000 as written. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Mr. Cameron abstaining. 3. Sketch Plan application #SD-00-54 of Daniel O'Brien and Leo O'Brien, Jr., for a planned unit development in which two lots totaling 60 acres are subdivided into 6 lots where lots 1, 2, 3 & 4 total 19.1 acres and lots 5 & 6 total 49.9 acres. The planned unit development will result in: 1) lot one developed with 46 multi -family residential units in 15 buildings; 2) lot 2 developed with 64 multi -family residential units in 7 buildings; 3) an undeveloped lot (lot 3); 4) a community park (lot 4); 5) a remaining lot including the existing buildings located at 200 Old Farm Road (lot 5); and 6) a remaining lot including the existing buildings located at 255 Kennedy Drive (lot 6), 200 Old Farm Road and 255 Kennedy Drive: Patrick O'Brien presented the plan. He showed a plan of the entire property, color coded to indicate the lots that are proposed for development and the proposed park area. He also indicated the lot that will not be developed. Mr. O'Brien then reviewed the staff comments. The location of the project is within the R-7 and R-1 districts. All proposed development is in the R-7 district. The plans meet the frontage requirements and minimum lot sizes. The maximum density allowed is 113. The plan proposes 110. Mr. O'Brien noted that the density from lots 3 & 4 is included for this density. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 NOVEMBER 2000 PAGE 3 With regard to wetlands, Mr. O'Brien said they are currently delineating to see where wetlands are located and what type they are. This information will be provided at preliminary plat. Mr. O'Brien noted that the official city map shows a city street connection at Hinesburg Rd./Old Farm Road. He showed where the road would go and noted that they would build "jogs" into the road so it doesn't become a speedway. Elevations and building details will be provided at preliminary plat. There is only one area where height may be an issue and that is where some 12-plexes are proposed. A member of the audience asked about the time -line for the project. Mr. Dinklage explained the approval process. The same audience member then asked about drainage and traffic and noise. She noted that traffic has become a serious issue. Mr. Dinklage said that drainage will be addressed at the next hearing. He noted that the area is zoned for this density but the Board will be concerned that accesses are safe. Audience members suggested provisions for special left turn lanes. Ms. Stevenson said she lives in the most affected unit and is overwhelmed. She felt the drawings vastly overstate the green space. She said it is at most 10 ft. of brush. She wanted to see a lot of buffering. Mr. Dinklage said the Board will pay a lot of attention to that. An audience member noted there is a category 3 wetland identified by ale state between Wellesley Grove and Georgetown. This is a small stream bed. A buffer is required by the state and also by the city. There are on the Act 250 map. An audience member asked for a lot of trees because of proximity to the Airport, etc. Ms. Voldman expressed concern with traffic, particularly with the safety of access onto Old Farm Rd. and Hinesburg Rd. There has also been a tremendous increase in noise in the last few years and she was worried that taking down the trees will increase noise even more. She suggested some berming. Mr. Perrotte presented a letter from Rev. Myra Swanson who could not be present at the meeting. Rev. Swanson said she had been told that the land was a wetland and could not be developed. Ms. Barnard cited traffic problems and presented a letter from Pat Lilienthal regarding traffic and the cutting of trees. Ms. Moreland asked about a sidewalk on Hinesburg Rd. and/or Kennedy Drive. Mr. MEMO South Burlington Planning &Zoning To: Patrick O'Brien, Dan O'Brien, O'Brien Brothers From: Juli Beth Hoover, Director of Planning & Zonin ' RE: Recommendations regarding Kennedy Drive in ersection improvements Date: May 24, 2001 cc: Bruce Hoar, Director, South Burlington Public Works Chuck Hafter, City Manager Roger Dickinson, Lamoureux & Dickinson This memo will summarize our recent discussions concerning improvements to the Kennedy Drive intersection related to the O'Brien Farm subdivision. 1. Intersection design. Pursuant to our discussions on April 18, the design for the intersection of the new subdivision road and Kennedy Drive is being completed by the City's engineers, MacFarland/Johnson. The City will bill O'Brien Brothers for MacFarland/Johnson's services. 2. Traffic improvements to be required. For purposes of this agreement, the City will assume that the only public road improvement measures warranted at this time are limited to the following: a. Building the Kennedy Drive/new subdivision road intersection to the specifications for the Kennedy Drive improvement project; b. Installing the triangular island shown on the draft plan dated 5/1/01 within the right of way of the new subdivision road; and c. Making this intersection right turn in/right turn out only. Unless the conclusions and recommendations of the traffic study being prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson are substantively different from this assessment, Staff will recommend to the DRB to limit the required improvements for approval to these measures at this time. Should further traffic analyses indicate that other improvements are required, this agreement would not relieve O'Brien Brothers or their successor from the need to install further improvements. 3. Credit against impact fees for traffic improvements. It is the City's position that installation of the triangular island to prevent left turns qualifies as an "in -kind" contribution to the Kennedy Drive improvement project as per Section 8 of the City's impact fee ordinance. As such it is eligible to be credited on a dollar -for -dollar basis against the road impact fees that will be due for this project. Planning & Zoning staff will recommend to the Development Review Board and City Council that any approval issued for this project include a recommendation to the City Council that the cost of these improvements be credited against the impact fees due. Krebs and Lansing and Heindel and Noyes installed equipment to continuously monitor the sewer line flow at the intersection of Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive for a period of eight days. We made the following observations, and have submitted them to the City Engineer, Bill Szymanski, for his review. 1. The sewer pipe crossing Kennedy Drive has a 10" diameter, City records indicate an 8" diameter pipe. 2. The pipe flow rates range from approximately 9 gpm at night to 500 to 600 gpm flow rates during peak flow times. The maximum flow rate recorded was 900 gpm (likely from simultaneous pump station discharges from adjacent developments). 4. Approximately 90% of the time the pipe carries less than 20% of its capacity and the pipe is carrying approximately 50% of its capacity during peak flow times. Based on a 16-hour day, the average flow from the O'Brien Home Farm Development is projected to be 21 gallons per minute. Using a peaking factor of 5, the peak flow rate is projected to be 105 gpm. Based on our continuous flow observations of the sewer collection pipe crossing Kennedy Drive, we estimate the pipe could flow at least 1200 gal/minute. The existing peak flows measure 500 to 600 gpm. Given this information, we feel the sewage flow from the O'Brien Home Farm Development will not have undue adverse affects on the South Burlington sewage collection infrastructure. (See results of continuous monitoring included as Attachment 1.) A2) The area of our project is not located in a flood plain. A3) A stormwater runoff analysis was performed on the proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm. The site was analyzed from Kimball Avenue on the north, Old Farm Road to the east, Hinesburg Road to the south and the condominium developments to the north. The site was analyzed utilizing the SCS TR55 stormwater model and Haestad Method Pond Pac version 7 for the 24-hour, 25-year pre development and post development conditions. The site was analyzed as 5 sub watersheds. With the use of stormwater treatment and retention structures, the following results were obtained for the 24 hour, 25 year storm event. Watershed Pre -Development Post Development Peak Runoff (cfs) Peak Runoff (cfs) 1 1.0 1.0 2 3.3 3.3 3 4.4 4.2 4 2.4 1.4 5 5_8 3_8 Total Pre -Development Runoff 16.9cfs 13.7cfs Total Post - Development Runoff Detention basins have been designed utilizing Vermont Best Management Practices for Treatment of Stormwater Runoff. The basins will collect and hold the first inch of runoff for 24 hours. The basins will have provisions for them to remain wet utilizing sumps for polishing of stormwater. The development has been designed to provide treatment of stonmwater runoff from much of the roads and parking via sheet flow over vegetated terrain. The downslope portions of the site will be banked by vegetated buffers and the 50-foot wide wetland buffers will not be disturbed. The construction plans for the project include temporary erosion control measures such as hay bale and silt fence barriers, stabilized construction entrance, re-establishing vegetation in disturbed areas as soon as possible, avoidance of wetlands and wetland buffers and ongoing inspection and maintenance of erosion control measures. (See Attachment 2 stormwater analysis and plans.) A4) We believe the proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm has been designed in conformance with all local and State regulations. B) The O'Brien Home Farm Development will require water for domestic use and fire flows. Based on a 16-hour delivery day, the average day demand for 45 townhouses and 56 multi -family units is estimated to be 35zE gallons per minute. Using a peaking factor of 5, the peak flow rate is estimated to be 175t gpm. A desirable fire flow is estimated to be 1500 to 2000 gpm. South Burlington is fortunate to be well supplied by water from Champlain Water District. We are enclosing as Attachment 3, the results of hydrant flow testing in the area of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road which indicate the water system is capable of delivering 2500 to 3000 gpm flows to the area of the O'Brien Home Farm Development. See attached fire flow results. The proposed water line extension to serve the O'Brien Home Farm Development will provide an additional loop of the Kennedy Drive -Hinesburg Road water system which will reduce friction loss and serve to strengthen the already substantial water distribution system. C) The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm has been designed to control and direct stormwater runoff into detention basins that will treat and release the runoff at rates equal to or lower than pre -development stormwater runoff levels. The development will preserve all of the wetlands and their buffers shown on the site plan, and will provide a vegetated buffer strip on the down slope sides. Temporary erosion control measures will be established and maintained during construction. Permanent erosion control measures include establishing permanent vegetation, paving roads and parking lots and maintaining stormwater collection and treatment facilities. D) See Attachment 4, traffic report prepared by Roger Dickinson, P.E., Lamoureux Dickinson Consulting Engineers. 3 E) See Attachment 5, letter from the South Burlington School District. F) We feel the proposed development of the proposed O'Brien Home Farm Development will not cause an unreasonable burden on the City of South Burlington to provide municipal or governmental services and facilities. The site is located close to the core of the City in an area designated for high -density development. The circulation roads serving the townhouse and multi -family units have been proposed as private roads minimizing municipal road maintenance on the site. The road to be dedicated to the City will be constructed to City standards; every effort will be made to minimize future maintenance costs to the City associated with this segment of road. The buildings and site will be designed to conform to all fire codes. The water system will provide adequate hydrants and the circulation road within the development will provide adequate circulation for emergency vehicles. The Applicant will submit the proposed design to the fire department for review and comments. The Applicant believes the project can be designed to restrict the risk of fighting fires or performing emergency rescue to acceptable levels. The site is located in close proximity to the core of the City in areas already patrolled by the South Burlington Police Department. Roads and road intersections will be designed in conformance with State and local regulations. The use of bus services to commute from the site is feasible and will contribute to less congestion. The design of bikeways and pedestrian connections will help to promote safe pedestrian circulation. The compact nature of the development will make routine police patrols quicker and easier. G) A design goal of ours has been to avoid important natural resources. Before any design work proceeded, the site was evaluated for wetlands, rare and endangered species, wildlife habitats and special features. See letter from Errol Briggs, Biologist (Attachment 6). The results of the evaluation indicated wetlands, and a small intermittent stream associated with a wetland, were important features. The design study employed was to identify a 50 foot wide buffer around the wetlands and stream and to leave the features and their buffers undisturbed (see site plans). H) The required landscape budget based on the south Burlington ordinance is $74,660.00. The plans indicate value exceeding this amount. The retention of vegetation in the natural open space areas will contribute additional value to the landscaping. Plants were chosen that are salt tolerant and disease resistant. No invasive plants are specified and plant material native to Vermont make up a large percent of the specified plants. Street trees are specified at 2" rather than 2.5" because of commercial availability but because of 35' spacing rather than the 60' spacing as required for subdivision streets, the cost and the aesthetics benefits will be greater (there are 77 street trees, 66 are required). Planned street trees are in a "greenbelt of 7 to 8 feet between the bike path and the curb and all tree pits will be three times the root ball. The linden tree has been proven to be reliably salt tolerant and they are spaced to accommodate street light spacing requirements. Grading has been held back along the north lot line adjacent to the Wellesley Grove Townhouses to retain as much of the existing vegetation as possible. Supplemental planting is proposed in this area to insure privacy of neighbors. The private side of the units adjacent to Hinesburg Road has been heavily screened with deciduous trees. Sixteen feet trees will screen the lower half of the units and afford relief from the western sun. The apartment area is surrounded by existing vegetation to remain. Plantings are predominately shade trees to bring down the scale of the two and three story buildings and to provide amenity for the residents. Many flowering trees are introduced in the newly cleared open spaces formed by the buildings. We have employed the University of Vermont Archaeology Consulting program to perform a Phase 1 Archaeological Assessment of the site. The site plans show areas which have been identified as potentially sensitive. Unusual Spring weather conditions have delayed the Phase 1 investigation. If the Phase 1 investigation identifies a site, the design strategy will be to avoid it. If avoidance is not possible, the University of Vermont Archaeological Assessment Team will be employed to recover the artifact(s). I) This proposed project provides a diversity of open space and recreational opportunities. The open spaces consist of two separate but very similar forested natural areas that have intermittent streams and wetland. Both of these areas would provide a natural area recreation experience in a wooded setting in the middle of this densely populated area. The first open area would be sandwiched between Georgetown, Wellesley Grove and the Townhouse unit that we are proposing. This area is approximately 1.5 acres in size and would be owned by the homeowners association of the townhouse area. No development other than fencing next to Wesley Grove (at their request) is proposed. The second open area is between the apartment buildings and Windridge. This area is approximately 1.9 acres in size. We are proposing to donate this area to the City to be used as a low intensity mini park. Preliminary discussions with the Recreation Path Committee seemed to support a meandering unimproved footpath with intermittent sitting benches. The walking path would connect to the bike path. A second mini -park is also being proposed in front of the Townhouses along Hayes Avenue Extension. This park's main objective is to serve as a tot -lot, and associated play items such as saddle mates, as well as several benches for sitting/watching. This mini - park is adjacent to the proposed bike path, which will provide access t this new as well as the existing neighborhoods. J) The O'Brien Home Farm Development will provide a local street with a bike path, street trees, curbs and infrastructure constructed to South Burlington road standards connecting Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive. The street is partially located in a corridor identified by the City as a future street. The Applicant is working in conjunction with the State of Vermont's engineering consultant, McFarland Johnson, to design a safe and efficient entrance to Kennedy Drive from the development. The local street is proposed as an extension of Hayes Avenue to the south and will serve an important function to connect the pedestrian circulation between the existing developments on the south and east sides of Kennedy and Hinesburg Drives. K) The proposed extension of Hayes Avenue loops through land owned by the Applicants. Should there be consideration of future development by adjoining property owners or the City of south Burlington, provisions have been made to accommodate water services and stormwater services and a road profile not exceeding 10% can be provided. The Town Plan identifies a local street link from Hinesburg Road to Old Farm Road as desirable. The proposed extension of Hayes Avenue can accommodate that extension. L) Compliance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan The Applicants feel the proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm is in conformance with the following sections of the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan: Chapter III Comprehensive Plan Goals The proposed development will advance the goals of the open space preservation, protection of wetlands, provide public landscaping, and provide outdoor recreational facilities. The proposed development is located in an area which has been zoned for high -density residential use. The proposed development will be in an area already being used. for compact urban development. The layout of the proposed development allows for compact urban densities while providing open space to protect adjacent wetlands and wetland buffers as well as provide land for public recreational use. The multi -family units and the townhouse units will provide quality housing which will be more efficient and use less land than single family housing. The proposed development will be located on or in close proximity to an existing Chittenden County Transportation Agency bus route which will encourage the use of cost effective, environmentally sound transportation to commute the work, shop or recreational activities. The proposed development will serve to extend a local street, a bikeway and water & sewer infrastructure into an area designated by the comprehensive plan as desirable for compact urban residential development. The development will also provide public recreational spaces, landscaping, protect open space, and is in general conformance with the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of South Burlington. Chapter IV Population The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm would result in the addition of 101 living units. From start to finish, the estimated time to complete the project would be 2.5 to 3.5 years. The estimated occupancy per unit is 2.3 persons. On a three-year buildout, this would result in a 97-person increase in the population in one year's time. This would represent slightly less than a .5% yearly growth in the South Burlington population. The comprehensive plan's stated objective is to limit population growth to 1.5% per year to promote a vital and healthy community. Chapter V Land Use The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm is in an area shown on Map 6 of the fixture land use plan to be high density residential use. The proposed development utilizes an average density of seven units per acre and is consistent with the plan's future land use pattern generally consisting of a higher density, compact urban core. 6 ]A Chapter VI Housing C This proposed development will offer housing opportunities for people of various income levels, age, household size, and mobility. The proposed development provides a close to equal mix of rental (54) vs. owner occupied (45) units. Each area will also provide a variety of housing types. The rental units will consist of four 8-plex's with detached garages and two 12-plex's with underground garages. The owner occupied units will be of the townhouse style and the existing grade of the site will allow three different elevation types to be built. Those types will include a walkout basement, a slab on grade or a basement garage with living levels above. Most units will also have options that include: a third bedroom, a den, an office for home occupation, a finished basement, and a two -car garage. Chapter IX Natural Resources Areas of wetlands have been identified on the O'Brien Home Farm. The wetlands and their buffers were identified before any design of the O'Brien Home Farm commenced. The proposed development avoids the wetlands and their buffers. This design study is consistent with the comprehensive statement that ... special care needs to be taken so that the remaining wetlands are carefully protected.... The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm will include stormwater retention and treatment basins to treat stormwater using best management practices recommended by the State of Vermont before discharging stormwater into the watershed. In addition, vegetative buffers will be maintained along the downslope side of the development and temporary and permanent erosion control measures will be employed during constriction of the development. Chapter X Recreation The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm will provide the public with a tot lot mini park and a passive recreation mini park. The development will also provide a public bikeway from Kennedy Drive to Hinesburg Road and access easements for the mini park. These facilities are consistent with the comprehensive plan's goal... to provide for varied recreational needs and interests of its citizens by providing areas and facilities for passive recreation, active sports, cultural and educational programs... Chapter XI Path System The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm will provide a pedestrian/bicycle trail connecting Kennedy Drive to Hinesburg Road along the corridor defined on Map 2 of the comprehensive plan. Chapter XII Transportation The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm is adjacent to an existing Chittenden County Transportation Authority bus route. The project plans include bus stops along the proposed expansion of Hayes Avenue. The close proximity of the development to the City core will encourage residents of the development to use the bus to commute to work, shopping and recreation. The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm will include a bicycle/pedestrian corridor from Kennedy Drive to Hinesburg Road, helping to enhance a more pedestrian friendly environment for residents of the Home Farm and surrounding developments. The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm proposes the construction of a local road. This road will be designed for low speed use, and is proposed as the northeasterly extension of Hayes Avenue. The proposed road has been designed to allow a connection to Old Farm Road as shown by Map 3 of the South Burlington comprehensive plan. Chapter XVI Energy Conservation The units proposed for the O'Brien Home Farm will be designed and constructed utilizing guidelines and recommendations from Energy Rated Homes of Vermont. The compact nature of the proposed development compared to a single family house development will create significant energy savings by lowering the surface are of roofs and walls exposed to the cold by approximately 50%. There are additional energy savings in less maintenance of lawns, driveways, and area lighting because the Home Farm Development will occupy approximately 14 acres of land. A single-family development with the same number of units would occupy 25 to 50 acres of land. The close proximity of the Home Farm Development to the City core should result in savings of energy costs for gasoline. Residents will be able to use the bus, bike and walk to work, school, shopping and recreation. ST®RMWATER ANALYSIS O'Brien Rome Farah SUMMARY: A stormwater runoff analysis was performed on the proposed development at the O'Brien Home Farm site in South Burlington. The site is bounded by Vermont Route 116 to the south Kennedy Drive and several existing condominium developments to the west, Kimball Avenue to the north, and Old Farm Road to the east. The site drains generally from east to west. Existing soils include Adams/Windsor sands, Farmington rocky loams, and Duane and Deerfield loamy sands. These soils range from very well draining (Soil Conservation Service Type A) to fairly poorly draining (SCS Type Q. The proposed development deals with approximately 16 acres of the site located in the southeast section of the property east of the Wellsley Grove and Georgetown developments. The majority of the soils in this area are Type A and B soils indicating relatively low runoff. The site is drained by two wetland areas, Wetlands B & C, that outlet off the site. The entire site was analyzed in the predevelopment condition. Five distinct natural discharge points were observed. None of the proposed development drains to Study Points I & 2 which are located in the northerly section of the site. Study Points 3, 4, & 5 are all located in the area of the proposed development. Study Point 5 is located in the extreme southwest corner of the site near Hinesburg Road (VT Route 116). Study Point 4 is located where Wetland B exits the property near the Wellsley Grove development. Study Point 3 is located at a 24" culvert under Kennedy Drive near the outlet of Wetland C. An additional 18" culvert located west of the 24" culvert is close enough to be considered part of Study Point 3 for modeling purposes. There are two distinct areas of development proposed for the site. Forty five townhouse units are proposed, clustered in the area north of Hinesburg Road south of Wellsley Grove. The second area consists of fifty two rental units in five muliplex buildings and two garages. This area is located north of the townhouses and east of Kennedy Drive. A new town road would access both areas and connect Hinesburg Road to Kennedy Drive. A combination of grading, retaining walls, catch basins, piping, and stormwater detention ponds has been designed to mitigate and spread out stormwater runoff from the development. In the townhouse area runoff is split to all three study points. The majority of the town road and the central cluster of buildings will be directed to a detention pond (Pond 1) east of the road. The pond would then outlet via piping and swaling to Study Point 5. This pond could also be expanded to handle runoff from future development if necessary. A portion of this area will drain directly to Study Point 5 via sheet flow and grass lined swales. A portion will be directed to Study Point 4 by similar means. The northerly portion of the townhouses will be collected and piped to another detention pond (Pond 2) located north of Wetland B, east of the Georgetown development. The multiplex area drains to Study Point 3 by several different means. The easterly section of road is collected and piped to Pond 2 where it combines with a portion of runoff from the townhouse area. Pond 2 then outlets via piping, rip rap, and swaling to the culverts under Kennedy Drive (Study Point 3). The majority of the buildings and associated parking is collected in a network of grass lined swales and piping and directed to a third detention pond (Pond 3) located east of Kennedy Drive, south of Wetland C. Pond 3 will then outlet through piping and rip rap to Study Point 3. A smaller portion of the buildings and some regraded areas will outlet directly to Study Point 3 via sheet flow, grass lined swales, and Wetland C. The following table illustrated pre and post development flows to the three study points without taking into account the effects of the detention ponds: Study Point 25 Year Pre development Peak Flow (cfs) 25 Year Post development Peak Flow (cfs) 3 4.4 10.7 4 2.4 1.4 5 5.8 8.6 The flow to Study Point 4 has actually been reduced, and the flows to Study Points 3 & 5 will be able to be reduced to pre development levels with the judicious use of the detention ponds and outlet structures. hfe-storm.wpd South Burlington School District Attachment 5 Act 250 School Impact Questionnaire for Residential Projects Applicant to Complete: Applicant Name: n' rian RrothArc Angenry Inc Municipality: South Burlington Number of Lots or Units: 101- Hayes Ave/Hinesburg/Kennedy Estimated Number of Students: 66 multi -family units x 2 bedrooms=112 x .1313=14.71 45 townhouse x 3 bedrooms= 135 x2625 g 35.43 Total, 50.14 School Superintendent or Equivalent to Complete: What schools under your supervision will provide educational services for families who will live in this project? Elementary School: Ghamberlin Middle School: FHTMS High School: SBHS Do these schools have the capacity to accept the additional students listed above? (assume equal grade distribution) _Yes or No If "no," what is the deficiency? While at the present time the school district can accommodate the additional students projected by this individual project, the concern for the School' District is with the cumulative impact of prior and continuing development in our community and the District's capacity to serve the students. This project, coupled with previous projects from last year and current requests, may cause the district to accelerate the year where the maximum capacity is reached, necessitating construction of a new facility. The passing of Act 60 adds additional concerns regarding development and developments impact on the tax rate. Construction aid for schools are now placed on a priority listing that would appear to make it difficult for So. Burlington to gain aid in a timely fashion to meet impending capacity needs if development would continue at the accelerated pace of the past two years. Any construction costs that are not offset by revenues other than property tax would further penalize our communities by increasing our above block cost for students and the corresponding taxes that would be raised and sent to the sharing pool. What plans are in place to correct the problem? Impact fees will serve to recapture space and renovate them into useable classrooms. District Offices will rent/build space outside of school facilities, If plans exist, how could this applicant help achieve those plans beyond adding new homes to the grand list? It is recommended that South Burlington continue to balance its growth bet%een business and housing. Do you have other comments? See above I certify the above information is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. liaril n Frederick Name Business Ifanagcr osttion 2-22-01 ate Are you available, after sufficient notice, to answer questions related to the above statements at an Act 250 hearing? X Yes or No 1 �� -N 'X"_ �SdQ ri 1d�i i'4'd 0 0— d� Mr. Ray Belair Development Review Board City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Belair, Carol Barnard 630 Hinesburg Road #20 South Burlington, VT 05403 5 March 2001 I am writing this letter as president of the Wellesley Grove Condominium Association Board of Directors and as an original owner of Unit 20 at Wellesley Grove. We have been following the review process for the O'Brien Brothers' proposed development between Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive and would like our views about this development to be added to the record. We have the following concerns: ♦ Noise, dirt, erosion and other disruptions will greatly diminish the quality of life of neighboring developments during the construction process. Since this is a phased devz-3pment, construction could last for years. ♦ Noise and impact on traffic of one hundred to two hundred additional cars entering and exiting the new development on Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive will be enormous. Both these roads are congested during peak traffic hours. Exhaust fumes from idling cars and trucks are already significant enough to cause some residents to keep their windows closed during rush hour. ♦ The road through the development will be used as a shortcut during rush hour, adding to traffic problems, particularly left turns into and out of the development. The number of cars using this shortcut will greatly increase when Old Farm Road is closed to through traffic. ♦ Preservation and protection of wetlands, vegetation, and animals are primary concerns both during and after the construction period. ♦ New construction could greatly exacerbate the existing drainage problems of standing water and erosion of the drainage ditch that parallels Hinesburg Road behind building 5 of Wellesley Grove. ♦ Privacy for adjoining units must be protected both during and after construction. Lines -of -site between buildings should be adjusted such that no windows look directly into another home. Wellesley Grove has been carefully sited in such a manner. ♦ Residents of the new development may use Wellesley Grove as a shortcut to and from Hinesburg Road. ♦ Pedestrian access to the recreation bike path along Kennedy Drive will be more difficult and dangerous with the new roads into Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road. ♦ The Development Review Board has stated its commitment to responsible and smart growth. This type of growth encourages the preservation of traditional settlement patterns. The rental units in this development are not a part of a traditional settlement pattern. Adjoining properties are primarily owner - occupied, with a few rentals. ♦ The addition of a third story to the rental units must be investigated rigorously. Existing views and lines - of -site must be preserved in this essentially rural area. Buildings of the proposed size will greatly impact the look and "feel" of the surrounding areas and will present precedence for future development that the DRB should not encourage. This type of building more correctly belongs in the City Center. We respectfully present our views to the Development Review Board as citizens, homeowners and taxpayers of the City of South Burlington. Please take them into consideration as you progress in the development review process for this project. Sincerely, Carol Barnard Cc: Jim Condos I Rev. Myra Swanson 630 Hinesburg Rd. Unit #3 So. Burlington, Vt. 05-403 Nov. 21, 2000 To Whom It May Concern The Townhouse that I moved into a little over a year ago borders on the property under discussion, and looks out over the field. When f purchased my house f was told that that the adjacent Iand -was a wetland and would never be developed. I understand that there is a need for housing and there can be much money involved in compromising the land. I ask that the land be blessed and -if it is developed that it be done so with the highest of integrity. Sincerely, , Rev. Myra rwanson 630 Hinesburg Road, Wellesley Grove #2, South Burlington, Vt.05403 Developmental Board South Burlington, Vt. I am writing this letter to inform you of my concerns over the O'Brien Planned Unit Development on Hinesburg Road, The traffic on Hinesburg Road has increased in the past 4 years, since I have moved here. Cars and large trucks have increased their use of this road to avoid Dorset Street The Butler Farms, new Concord Green Condominiums and, other neighborhoods have added to the use. Another large development will add substantially increase the traffic problems on the road. The other problem it the water in the land, during a rainstorm the water runs down the road and lands in large puddles on the lawns. The land behind Wellesley Grove is always marshy even in the winter. There are several wet lands surrounding our compley- This development will also make an impact on the schools and school bus routes. I understand the city wants to keep the density in certain areas and that this development has offered a section land for a park. [ This was reported on the Channel #3 news last night./ I do hope the Developmental Board will consider these concerns, unfortunately I can not attend this meeting as I have a prior commitment. I do plan to attend any future meetings. The Wellesley Grove Condominium Association will discuss this problem at our ext Board meeting. Marjorie VonOhlsen 125 Kennedy Drive, #35 South Burlington, VT 05403 December 29, 2000 Mr. James Condos, Chair South Burlington City Council 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Condos: In a December issue of The Other Paver, a detailed account of the City's prospective plans to widen Kennedy Drive to four lanes, was described. The residents of the Georgetown Condominium complex noted that there was no provision for a sidewalk on the south side of Kennedy Drive between Hinesburg Road and Kimball Avenue. For many years our residents have had to contend with the increased traffic on Kennedy Drive and the inability to cross to the bike path. The best way to cross is to walk to the corner and cross with the traffic light at either Hinesburg Road or Kimball Avenue. Access to public transportation is now available at either comer. Walking in the street is not an option, especially in the winter. Islands to aid pedestrians and bikers are of no use unless they are at the corner with a traffic light. The volume and the speed of traffic on the road preclude a senior citizen from cross two lanes of traffic safel . The addition of more than 100 new residential units on the O'Brien property behind Georgetown will add more congestion entering onto Kennedy Drive. The Association would appreciate the Council's consideration of our request for a sidewalk. Sincerely, Thomas Crowley President, Georgetown Homeowners Association 125 Kennedy Drive, #35 South Burlington, VT 05403 January 18, 2001 Mr. John Dinklage, Chair Development Review Board City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlingto VT 403 Dear M e: Residents of the Georgetown Condominium Association at 125 Kennedy Drive attended the meeting of the Development Review Board of November 21, 2000 at which the plan of Leo and Dan O'Brien for their property on Hinesburg Road was discussed. You suggested that Patrick O'Brien representing the O'Brien Brothers get in touch with our Association. Pat O'Brien came to a meeting of the Board of Directors on November 28, 2000. After the presentation the Board made three suggestions that we would like to have considered: 1. Designations of the common lot line from Kennedy Drive around to Wellesley Grove. 2. A high enough fence to prevent access to our property. 3. The retention of the trees along the line to provide a buffer between the properties. Thank you for consideration of this matter. We would appreciate notification when the plans come up for future review. Sincerely, Thomas Crowlef, President, Georgetown Homeowners Association ( c-,: ,. m, r, --, .���a-�� �m -- A real Se. t e4-s v L t ct . E-t fS 4 s ova, eve r- `� � c s•e.e�s c� ��.�� cc ��4� \e.ve+� �� �•.r� l �1�.+(' S �c� t` o � of - And �Ct,i s ei roSL un c� \ cC-5c 1 \A-Couccf\ C, �. � erc� of '� �.�Sc� 4 c��•t fie.. oc+.� Clem 4, �tti��n�s Gcc �c.c.�Aq-- �- �.e. c. , l4- [o �- o � • �e� �1 c_ Wan,4- $a e'vt�,lc �, . ire cat i rc c.�n.�cc- �� . t3c� r2rt �'�}rt-a c • s l ®'�- 4,L� And cIrr- � c S ctoM t Su y •�,� lam '1 o cue ytv c �� J��� wc� �w� � Gonvc� r�•t �-1,..o�SWk-�a T�n� �ov °eve- c• c� `' RS ��` S . S cJc(lC��e� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) Daniel and Leo O'Brien Jr., DBA Forest Park Realti Corp. and The O'Brien Family Limited Partnership, The O'Brien Brothers Agency, P.O. Box 2184, South Burlington, Vermont 05407 phone 658-5000, (fax) 658 5002 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 142, page 457 and Book 420, page 345. 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Same as Owner 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Patrick O'Brien, The O'Brien Brothers Agency, P.O. Box 2184, South Burlington, Vermont 05407 phone 658-5000, (fax) 658-5002 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS Lot 1 fronts Hinesburg Road, Lot 2 fronts Kennedy Drive, the City road fronting Lots 1 and 2 is proposed as an extension of Haves Avenue. 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 29-1-2 and 29-1-10 (Map 42, section 4) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) The existing property is woodland and grassland. The grassland is harvested yearly. remain) b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) 45 townhouse style condominium units and related site work are proposed on Lot 1. 56 multi -family condominium units in 6 buildings and related site work are proposed for Lot 2. Lots 3 and 4 are proposed as City owned parks. The right-of-way for Hayes Avenue is also proposed to be dedicated to the City of South Burlington. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to There are no buildings presently on the property. Lot 1 is proposed to have 60,400 s.f. of total building coverage. Lot 2 is proposed to have 50,000 s.f. of total building coverage. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) There will be three separate townhouse elevations: 1) two story with a basement walkout: 2) two story on slab: 3) basement entry garage with two stories above. There will be two different multi -family building styles. There will be four 2-story eight-plex's consisting of four 2- bedroom flats per floor. There will also be two 12-plex's, with four 2- bedroom flats per floor with underground parking_ e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) 45 townhouses and 56 multi -family residential units in 6 buildings. f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non - office employees) Not applicable g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) We are requesting the following waiver of subdivision /zoning regulations: 1. Building separation reduced to 10 feet (Section 405, Subdivision Regulations) with the appropriate design of the building walls to meet applicable fire codes. 2. A reduction in the front yard building setback from 30 to 15 feet. 3. To adopt the typical road cross section shown on sheet 11 of Krebs & Lansing plans. No change to required Subbase infrastructure is proposed. (Exhibit A Subdivision Regulations) 4. The Applicant requests an increase in allowable height for the multi -family units to 45 feet maximum and to waive the increase in setbacks prescribed for buildings taller than 40 feet. (Section 25.113(d) of Zoning Regulations) 5. To waive the private circulation road width of 24 feet to allow a 22 foot width on Lot 2 in the multi -family development. (Section 401 Q & (K) Subdivision Regulations) 6. To allow more than 20 units to be served by a private road on Lots 1 and 2. ,(Section 401 Q & (K) Subdivision Regulations) h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. The proposed project is a new proposal. There is no existing subdivision. The proposed development is to subdivide portions of two lots to create four lots, a public right-of-way with the remaining lands in each of the two original lots owned by Daniel O'Brien and Leo O'Brien, Jr. 8) LOT COVERAGE LOT 1 LOT 2 a) Building: Existing 0 % Proposed 16.3 % Existing 0 % Proposed 17.0 % LOT 1 LOT 2 b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 % Proposed 31.9 % Existing 0 % Proposed 39.4 % LOT 1 LOT 2 c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 0 %Proposed 4.3 % Existing 0 % Proposed 15.3 % 9) COST ESTIMATES LOT 1 LOT 2 a) Building (including interior renovations) $ 4,050,000. $ 2,666,000. LOT 1 LOT 2 b) Landscaping: $ The required landscape budget based on the south Burlington ordinance is $74,660.00. The plans indicate value exceeding this amount. The retention of vegetation in the natural open space areas will contribute additional value to the landscaping. Plants were chosen that are salt tolerant and disease resistant. No invasive plants are specified and plant material native to Vermont make up a large percent of the specified plants. Street trees are specified at 2" rather than 2.5" because of commercial availability but because of 35' spacing rather than the 60' spacing as required for subdivision streets, the cost and the aesthetics benefits will be greater (there are 77 street trees, 66 are required). Planned street trees are in a "greenbelt of 7 to 8 feet between the bike path and the curb and all tree pits will be three times the root ball. The lindentree has been proven to be reliably salt tolerant and they are spaced to accommodate street fight spacing requirements. Grading has been held back along the north lot line adjacent to the Wellesley Grove Townhouses to retain as much of the existing vegetation as possible. Supplemental planting is proposed in this area to insure privacyoghbors. The private side of the units adjacent to Hinesburg Road has been heavily screened with deciduous trees. Sixteen feet trees will screen the lower half of the units and afford relief from the western sun. The apartment area is surrounded by existing vegetation to remain. Plantings are predominately shade trees to bring down the scale of the two and three story buildings and to provide amenity for the residents. Many flowering trees are introduced in the newly cleared open spaces formed by the buildings. c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) Lot 1 site work, roads, parking, sidewalk $150,000. Lot 2 roads, parking, sidewalks $87,500. Construct approximately 2,000 LF of road to City of South Burlington Standards including infrastructure, bike path and landscaping 30$ 0,000. 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) See traffic report b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) Prepared by Roger Dickinson, P.E. c) P.M. peak hour for entire property (in and out) Lamoureux and Dickinson Consulting Engineers 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION Not applicable 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Not applicable 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE The Applicants would like to start work on Lots 1 and 2 and the municipal road as soon as permits are issued. The estimated duration of activities is 3 years. 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (1 1" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). Fee calculation = $75 + $10 + (101 units x $5/unit) _ $590.00 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. ` +1��..>' ""_� V` ►� - �'�b 1''� �`-''-� �. ter � SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT S NATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: Complete Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date -...;:i TOWNHOUSE Y" = Trees er y AND COMMUNITY PLANTINGS Qty. '641 Scientific Name Common Name Size Spec Comments AL ;AMELMCHIER Laevis Allegheny Servicebeny 5-6' ht. B&B v :3K AR -ACER rubrum 'Red Sunset' ! Red Sunset Maple 2-2.5" cal. B&B (gp '`:'S•__ AS;: ACER saccharum "Green Mountain' Green Mountain Sugar Maple 2-2:5" cal. B&B i 5 ' ,.30 P- :BETULA'papyrifera Paper Birch 8-10' ht. B&B 3 Stem Clump fs --1T., G61, _ 1 CRATAEGUS crusgalli 'inermis' Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn 1.5-2" cal. B&B c-) ( C-/ j 3 GTH-.GLEDITSIAU.'Haika' Halka Hone locust 2 2.5" cal. P�- B&B 9 LD LAkIX decidua European Larch 6-8' ht.s-� B&B WALUS Floribunda Floweing'Crabapple 1.5-2"cal. B&B 11 .• PN' INUS nigra Austrian Pine 5'-6' ht. B&B 9sv PI US strobus White Pine 5'-6' ht. B&B 070.5 6 C O PRNUS sargentii Sargent Cherry 2-2.5" cal. B&B (-9 1 tl. 1 ; ,CRJ CUS bicolor Swamp White Oak 2-2.5" cal. B&B 2 QR j'O�JERCUS rubra Red Oak 2-2.5" cal. B&B 8 � LI;;X alba Tristis' Golden Weeping Willow 2-2.5" cal. B&B 16G :'', . ,SO OYRINGAreticulata Japanese Tree Lilac 5'-6' ht. B&B multi --stem lo3 HU1A occidentalis'Nigra' Dark American Arborvitae 5' ht. B&B 3 WA rdata "Greenspire"": Greenspire Litteleaf Linden 2-2.5" cal. B&B / 6 i to tt oWrit .ii within the public Right of Way. Sh ' - Scientific Name Common Name Size Sec 7 . O IA melanocarpa Black Chokebeny 3-4' ht. B&B CO 16 . 2 9. '. C C 4 f�A alnifolia 'Comoacata' Compact Summersweet Ae 2 gal. cons I S• Z s— ...25 AAA, US aiba'Ar enteo-ma inata' Variegated Red -Twig Dogwood 3-4' ht. B&B I S•s u O 'i'HIA'N.H.Gold' ' New Hampshire Gold Forsythia 3-4' ht. cont. 2$ .J P U I. Ef WS ch. 'Pfitzeriana Compacts' Compact Pfitzer Juniper 18-24" B&B 3-4' O.C. -471; Mb BIOTA decussata Russian Cypress 15-18" cont. 5' 0 -C& 17. 2 4 Si5 IRA .:. umalda 'Anthony Waterer' Anthony Waterer Spirea 2.5-3' ht. cont. 2 ,S 10 TMD rn is 'Densiformis' Dense Spreading Yew 18-24" ht. B&B 22 [�s ��t}so � ako i-,� �u -cv{ �' -� t �."+i�``4^+;AZif�'j'�t'G��`�i��k t. ^.'a• • j-:. ;( :.ow'A;ti�;''� }Y,'�;+°"��a•r' / =� � Y Y�SyG t gG�'`�e'; ±!�y`lT��{a. •�c 3Z.irf��:�,<t.% f s� "� at�' '•-t i + c �~` ' ��~�,:'��°!.� ° � x �; Y\BLS , "t��� :},y a.�er \ � 5�r3 4.�� r ,••. '+ 1 S. ? �, � '? •+; `tio?, •: • "�„ . "r:, v"�` talc ; a_ �:.; : a4 •�c• • r. �` f +r} _ �' \ F Rim ..339. (3) IZ a$} LL i TH(9).75 15 G 1 '� >c• 1 4 �,'' �'r a �,,{ .. . � z � >`��= � r r $-;��•:� -�;� In _ . 3� _7..9 \ ;, � % �: 326. � � , ..� 1 SS Q c/ soo ?397 ,65 3 95: Su G�Z 0 ok 3)0z 38� 17Z� 32� 2' � 9G � 3.SU i t:5�- 3rs 7 s 6zz 7s- 0-2-0 LIGHTING KEY �-/ �-f nG S �. ;> S` (SEE SHEET L4 FOR SPECIFICATIONS) GE M-250 CUTOFF 1I 239 * QUALITY LIGHTING DESIGN 129 use' QU ALITY SH EILIGHTING DESIGN 129 GE WALL LIGHTER 250 # KIM LIGHTING CFL1 I APARTMENT AREA PLANTING Trees r1tv Code Scientific Name Common Name Size Spec Comments 7 AL AMELANCHIER Laevis Allegheny Serviceberry 5-6' ht. B&B Q 9 5- 12 AR ACER rubrum 'Red Sunset' Red Sunset Maple 2-2.5" cal. B&B 1 AS ACER saccharum "Green Mountain' Green Mountain Sugar Maple 2-2.5" cal. B&B i 22 BP BETULA papyrifera Paper Birch 8-10' ht. B&B 3 Stem Clump 2 CCI CRATAEGUS crusgaili'lnermis' Thomless Cocks ur Hawthom 1.5-2" cal. B&B i cq 11 GTH GLEDITSIA U. 'Halka' Halka Hone locust 2-2.5" cal. B&B i �9 3 MF MALUS Floribunda Floweing Crabapple 1.5-2"cal. B&B l 13 PS PILAUS strobus White Pine 5'-6' ht. B&B v 1 PSC PRUNUS sargentii Sargent Cherry 2-2.5" cal. B&B 13 QR QUERCUS rubra Red Oak 2-2.5" cal. B&B t K y 38 TCG TILIA cordata 'Greenspire' * Greenspire Litteleaf Linden 2-2.5" cal. B&B 167 * Trees to be planted within the public Right of Way. Shruhs Q . Code Scientific Name Common Name Size Spec 13 AM ARONIA melanocarpa, Black Chokebe 34' ht. B&B 12 CA CLETHRA alnifolia'Paniculata' La a Panicled Summersweet 2 gal. cont. 2 5- 18 CAM CORNUS alba ' enteo-ma inata' Variegated Red -Twig Dogwood 3-4' ht. B&B (--& 21 FS FORSYTHIA'N.H.Gold' New Hampshire Gold Forsythia 34' ht. cunt. 7, ? _s- 15 JB JUNIPERUS sabina 'Broadmooe Broadmoor Juniper 18-24" cont. 3-4' O.C.r 11 JCP JUNIPERUS ch. 'Pfitzeriana Compacts' Compact Pfitzer Juniper 18-24" B&B 3-4' O.C.i 3, 20 MD MICROBIOTA decussata Russian Tess 15-18" cont. 5' O.C. 8 PM PINUS mu o'Mu o' Compact Mugo Pine 18-24" B&B 56 RR ROSA ru osa Beach Rose 18-24" ht, cont. 4' O.C. 7. 4 SB SPIRAEA bumaida 'AnthonyWaterer AnthonyWaterer S irea .5-3' ht. cont. , . S� 12 Sp SPIRAEA runifolia Bridalwreath Spirea 2-3' ht. --- _ cunt. i 1 o SIC STEPHANANDRA incisa 'Cris a' Cutleaf Ste hanandra 2 gal. cont. awe, i 21 SYA SYMPHORICARPOS albus Common Snowbe 2-T ht. cons 2 a- 5 TMD TAXUS media'Densiformis' Dense So adinYew 18-24" ht. B&B 3 , a s 1 VT VIBURNUM tdlobum American Cranbegy Vibumum 4-5' ht. B&B /, O Groundcovens & LIGHTING KEY (SEE SHEET L4 FOR SPECIFICATIONS) GE M-260 CUTOFF (QUALITY LIGHTING DESIGN 129 a . 17 y9 % _ � 34 a IV5 a 3ya �- 4` Y Mj 5" YL> qs— r.. e0o o` ..." LOT COVERAGES FOR O'BRIEN rIOME FARM Lot 1 (8.5 acres or 370,260 s.f.) Parking/Roads = 54,701 s.f. 14.8% SidewalkBikepath = 3,070 s.f. 0.8% Buildings = 60,391 s.f. 16.3% Total Coverage = 31.9% Lot 2 (5.3 acres or 230,868 s.f.) Parking/Roads = 35,061 s.f. 15.2% SidewalkBikepath = 6,010 s.f. 2.6% Buildings = 39,600 s.f. 17.2% Garages = 9,500 s.f. 4.1% Total Coverage = 39.1 % New ROW (2.7 acres or 117,612 s.f.) Road = 61,830 s.f. 52.6% Bikepath = 14,149 s.f. 12.0% Total Coverage = 64.6% Lot 3 (0.25 acres or 10,890 s.f.) Sidewalk = 369 s.f. 3.4% Lot 4 (1.9 acres or 82,764 s.f.) None Lot 1 Front Yard Area 65,310 s.f. Lot 1 Front Yard Coverage 1,840.5 s.f. Percent Front Yard Coverage Lot 1 2.8% Lot 2 Front Yard Area 29,010 s.f. Lot 2 Front Yard Coverage 4,467.5 s.f. Percent Front Yard Coverage Lot 2 15.4% 001823ot coverages Overall Site Coverage Lots 1, 2,3 and 4 and ROW (18.65 acres or 812,394 s.f.) Parking, Roads/Sidewalks = 175,190 s.f. 21.6% Buildings = 99,991 s.f. 12.3% Accessory Buildings = 9,500 s.f. 1.2% Total Coverage = 35.1% Results of Sewer Line Flow Monitoring at the Intersection of Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive, South Burlington 211101 Through 219101 Attachment 1 Liquid Level Monitoring: Percent Full 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% U. 50% a 40% i i 30% — 20% 10% 0% 2/1 0:00 2/2 0:00 2/3 0:00 2/4 0:00 2/5 0:00 2/6 0:00 2/7 0:00 2/8 0:00 2/9 0:00 Date/Time U:\PROJECTS\KREBS—SEWER\SBSEWER.yJs 219/01 1000 .E4 d a fA G O ca M d R E p w 10 1 !- 2/1 0:00 Estimated Flows (Assuming Uniform Flow; Actual Flows may be Significantly Different) 2/2 0:00 2/3 0:00 2/4 0:00 2/5 0:00 2/6 0:00 2/7 0:00 2/8 0:00 Date/Time 2/9 0:00 W U:\PROJECTS\KREBS SEWERISBSEWER.)ds 2(9/01 PAGE_1 OF 24 Sewer Flow Monitoring South Burlington, VT Site: Manhole at Intersection of Route 116 and Kennedy Drive Recorded by Global Water WL-14 Logger with Pressure Transducer Diameter of sewer pipe (ft): 0.83 K = 0.5 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above plRe invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity fUs I Flow cfs n S I P, ft I R, ft R 2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/1/2001 11:30 0.26 3.1 31 % 1.19 0.15 4.11 0.60 0.015 0.030 0.992 0.15 0.28 4.80 0.70 270 - 316 2/1/2001 11:40 6.20 2.4 24% 1.01 0.10 3.56 0.35 0.015 0.030 0.846 0.12 0.24 4.09 0.40 157 - 180 2/1/2001 11:50 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.82 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.658 0.08 0.18 3.09 64 - 70 2/1/2001 12:00 0.20 2.4 24% 1.02 0.10 3.57 0.35 0.015 0.030 0.849 0.12 0.24 4.10 _0.16 0.41 159 - 183 2/1/2001 12:10 0.13 1.5 15% 0.81 0.05 2.88 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.674 0.08 0.19 3.18 0.17 69 - 76 2/1/2001 12:20 0.18 2.2 22% 0.97 0.09 3.41 0.30 0.015 0.030 0.806 0.11 0.23 3.88 0.34 133 - 151 2/1/2001 12:30 0.11 1.4 14% 0.76 0.04 2.71 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.630 0.07 0.17 2.94 0.13 54 - 59 2/1/2001 12:40 0.13 1.5 15% 0.80 0.05 2.87 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.670 0.08 0.18 3.15 0.17 68 - 75 2/1/2001 12:50 0.11 1.3 13% 0.73 0.04 2.60 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.606 0.07 0.16 2.80 0.11 47 - 50 2/1/2001 13:00 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.75 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.642 0.07 0.18 3.00 0.14 58 - 63 2/1/2001 13:10 _0.12 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.75 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.642 0.07 0.18 3.00 0.14 58 - 63 2/1/2001 13:20 0.10 1.2 12% 0.72 0.04 2.59 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.602 0.07 0.16 2.78 0.11 46 - 49 2/1/2001 13:30 0.21 2.5 25% 1.05 0.11 3.66 0.39 0.015 0.030 0.872 0.12 0.25 4.22 174 - 201 2/1/2001 13:40 0.13 1.6 16% 0.83 0.06 2.94 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.689 0.08 0.19 3.26 _0.45 0.19 75 - 83 2/1/2001 13:50 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.79 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.650 0.07 0.18 3.05 0.15 61 - 67 2/1/2001 14:00 0.10 1.2 12% 0.72 0.04 2.59 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.602 0.07 0.16 2.78 0.11 46 - 49 2/1/2001 14:10 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 1 2.75 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.642 0.07 0.181 3.00 0.14 58 - 63 2/1/2001 14:20 _0.12 0.13 1.5 15% 0.80 0.05 2.85 0.15 10.01510.030 0.666 0.08 0.18 3.13 0.16 66 - 73 2/1/2001 14:30 0.21 2.5 25% 1.05 0.11 3.66 0.39 0.015 0.030 0.872 0.12 0.25 4.22 0.45 174 - 201 2/1/2001 14:40 _0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.75 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.642 0.07 0.18 3.00 0.14 58 - 63 2/1/2001 14:50 _0.16 1.9 19% 0.89 0.07 3.16 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.744 0.09 0.21 3.55 0.25 99 - 112 2/1/2001 15:00 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.80 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.654 0.08 0.18 3.07 0.15 62 - 68 2/1/2001 15:10 0.16 1.9 19% 0.89 0.07 3.16 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.744 0.09 0.21 3.55 0.25 99 - 112 2/1/2001 15:20 _0.14 17% 0.86 0.06 3.05 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.715 0.09 0.20 _ 3.40 0.21 86 - 96 2/1/2001 15:30 0.15 _1.7 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.06 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.718 0.09 0.20 3.42 0.22 88 - 98 2/1/2001 15:40 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.02 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.707 0.09 0.20 3.36 0.21 83 - 92 2/1/2001 1 5-.-567 0.18 2.2 22% 0.97 0.09 3.42 0.30 0.015 0.030 0.809 0.11 0.23 3.90 0.34 135 154 2/1/2001 16:00 _0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.74 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.638 0.07 0.17 2.98 0.14 57 - 62 2/1/2001 16:10 0.21 2.5 25% 1 1.05 0.11 3.66 0.39 0.015 0.030 0.872 0.12 0.25 4.22 0.45 174 - 201 2/1/2001 16:20 _ 0.13 _ _1.6 16% 0.81 0.0_5 2.90 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.677 0.68 0.19 3.20 0.1_7 71 - 78 2/1/2001 16:30 0.14 1.7 2.9 17% 0.85 0.06 3.02 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.707 0.09 0.20 3.36 0.21 83 - 92 2/1/2001 16:40 _0.25 29% 1.15 0.13 3.97 0.53 0.015 0.030 0.956 0.14 0.27 4.63 0.62 239 - 279 2/1/2001 16:50 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.02 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.707 0.091 0.20 3.36 0.21 83 - 92 2/1/2001 17:00 _ 0.14 ^0.15 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.03 '0.19 1 0.015 0.030 0.711 0.09 0.20 3.38 0_.21 85 - 94 2/1/2001 17:10 1.8 18% 0.87 0.06 3.08 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.722 0.09 0.20 3.44 0.22 89 - 100 U:TROJECTSUtREBS SEWER\SBSEWER.XLS 2/9/01 PAGE 2 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above DiRe invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft R, ft R 2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/1/2001 17:20 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.02 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.09 0.20 3.36 0.21 83 - 92 2/1/2001 17:30 0.29 3.5 35% 1.26 4.33 0.73 0.015 0.030 _0.707 1.054 0.16 0.30 5.08 0.86 329 - 386 2/1/2001 17:40 0.14 1.7 17% 0.86 _0.17 0.06 3.05 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.715 0.09 0.20 _ 3.40 0.21 86 - 96 2/1/2001 17:50 0.26 3.1 31 % 1.18 0.14 4.07 0.58 0.015 0.030 0.983 0.15 0.28 4.76 0.68 262 - 307 2/1/2001 18:00 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.03 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.711 0.09 0.20 3.38 0.21 85 - 94 2/1/2001 18:10 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.20 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.754 0.10 0.21 3.61 0.26 105 - 118 2/1/2001 18:20 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.34 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.789 0.10 0.22 3.79 0.31 123 - 140 2/1/2001 18:30 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.071 3.13 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.737 0.091 0.20 3.52 1 0.24 96 - 108 2/1/2001 18:40 6.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.12 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.733 0.09 0.20 3.50 0.24 94 - 106 2/1/2001 18:50 0.11 1.3 13% 0.75 0.04 2.69 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.626 0.07 0.17 2.92 0.13 53 - 57 2/1/2001 19:00 0.30 3.6 36% 1.28 0.17 4.37 0.76 0.015 0.030 1.065 0.16 0.30 5.13 0.89 341 - 400 2/1/2001 19:10 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.12 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.733 0.09 0.20 3.50 0.24 94 - 106 2/1/2001 19:20 0.33 4.0 40% 1.36 1 0.20 4.61 0.93 0.015 0.030 1.134 0.18 0.321 5.41 1.09 1415 - 488 2/1/2001 19:30 0.19 2.2 22% 0.99 0.09 3.47 0.32 0.015 0.030 0.823 0.11 0.23 3.97 0.36 143 - 163 19:40 0.19 2.2 22% 0.98 0.09 3.46 0.31 0.015 0.030 0.819 0.11 0.23 3.95 0.36 141 - 161 _2/1/2001 2/1/2001 19:50 0.19 2.3 23% 1.00 0.10 3.52 0.34 0.015 0.030 0.836 0.11 0.24 4.04 0.39 151 - 173 2/1/2001 20:00 0.18 2.1 21% 0.96 0.08 3.38 0.29 0.015 0.030 0.799 0.11 0.22 3.85 0.33 129 - 147 2/1/2001 20:10 0.32 3.8 38% 1.33 0.19 4.53 0.87 0.015 0.030 1.111 0.17 0.31 5.32 1.02 390 - 458 2/1/2001 20:20 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.30 0.26 0.015 0.030 0.779 0.10 0.22 3.74 0.30 117 - 133 20:30 0.21 2.6 26% 1.06 0.11 3.72 0.41 0.015 0.030 0.887 0.13 0.25 4.30 0.48 186 - 215 _2/1/2001 20:40 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.13 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.737 0.09 0.20 3.52 0.24 96 - 108 _2/1/2001 2/1/2001 20:50 0.15 1.8 18% 0.87 0.07 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.726 0.09 0.20 3.46 0.23 91 - 102 2/1/2001 21:00 0.14 1.7 17% 0.84 0.06 _3.09 3.00 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.704 0.09 0.19 3.34 0.20 81 - 91 2/1/2001 21:10 0.22 26% 1.08 0.12 3.77 0.43 0.015 0.030 0.900 0.13 0.25 4.36 0.50 195 - 226 2/1/2001 21:20 0.13 _2.6 15% 0.81 0.05 2.88 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.674 0.08 0.19 3.18 0.17 69 - 76 2/1/2001 21:30 0.14 _1.5 17% 0.84 0.06 3.00 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.704 0.09 0.19 3.34 0.20 81 - 91 2/1/2001 21:40 6.19 _1.7 2.2 22% 0.99 0.09 3.47 0.32 0.015 0.030 0.823 0.11 0.23 3.97 0.36 143 - 163 2/1/2001 21:50 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.79 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.650 0.07 0.18 3.05 0.15 61 - 67 2/1/2001 22:00 0.30 3.7 37% 14% 1.30 0.77 0.18 0.05 4.43 2.75 0.80 0.13 0.015 0.015 0.030 0.030 1.083 0.642 0.17 0.07 0.30 0.18 5.20 3.00 0.94 0.14 359 - 422 58 - 63 2/1/2001 22:10 0.12 1.4 2/1/2001 22:20 0.29 3.5 35% 1.26 0.17 4.31 1 0.72 0.015 0.030 1.048 0.16 0.29 5.05 0.85 324 - 379 2/1/2001 22:30 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.75 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.642 0.07 0.18 3.00 0.14 58 - 63 2/1/2001 22:40 0.29 3.5 35% 1.26 0.17 4.32 0.73 0.015 0.030 1.051 0.16 0.30 5.06 0.85 327 - 383 2/1/2001 22:50 0.11 1.3 13% 31 % 0.73 1.18 0.04 0.14 2.62 4.08 0.11 0.59 0.015 0.015 0.030 0.030 0.610 0.986 0.07 0.1510.281 0.16 2.83 4.77 0.12 0.69 48 - 52 265 - 310 2/1 /2001 23:00 0.26 3.1 2/1/2001 23:10 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.75 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.642 0.07 0.18 3.00 0.14 58 - 63 2/1/2001 23:20 2/1/2001 23:30 0.15 0.11 1.8 18% 14% 0.88 0.76 0.07 0.04 3.13 2.71 0.21 0.12 0.015 0.015 0.030 0.030 0.737 0.630 0.09 0.07 0.20 0.17 3.52 2.94 0.24 0.13 96 - 108 54 - 59 1.4 2/1/2001 23:40 2/1/2001 23:50 0.12 _l.5 1.3 15% 0.79 0.05 2.83 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.662 0.08 0.18 3.11 0. 66 65 - 71 0.11 13% 12% 11 %r0-.6 0.74 0.70 8 0.04 0.04 0.03 2.66 2.52 2.43 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.015 0.015 0.015 _0.030 0.030 0.618 0.585 0.563 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.17 0.16 0.15 2.87 2.69 0.12 0.10 50 - 55 41 - 44 2/2/2001_0:00 2/2/2001 0:10 0.10 1.2 0.09 1.1 2.57 0.08 35 - 37 2/2/2001 0:20 0.09 6.09 1.1 11 %8 11 %8 0.03 0.03 2.43 2.45 0.08 0.08 0.015 0.015 _0.030 0.030 0.030 0.563 0.567 0.06 0.06 0.15 0.15 2.57 0.08 35 - 37 2/2/2001 0:30 1.1 2.59 0.09 36 39 U:%PROJECTS\KREBS SEWER\,SBSEWER.XLS 2/9/01 PAGE 3 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above plRe invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft R, ft R 2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/2/2001 0:40 0.08 0.9 9% 0.63 0.03 2.26 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.522 0.05 0.14 2.34 0.06 27 - 28 2/2/2001 0:50 0.08 0.9 9% 0.61 0.02 2.22 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.512 0.05 0.13 2.29 0.06 25 - 26 2/2/2001 1:00 0.08 0.9 9% 0.63 0.03 2.26 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.522 0.05 0.14 2.34 0.06 27 - 28 2/2/2001 1:10 0.07 0.8 8% 0.59 0.02 2.13 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.492 0.05 0.13 2.18 0.05 21 - 22 2/2/2001 1:20 0.25 3.1 31 % 1.17 0.14 4.05 0.57 0.015 0.030 0.977 0.14 0.28 4.73 0.67 257 - 300 2/2/2001 1:30 0.06 0.7 7% 0.55 0.02 2.00 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.462 0.041 0.121 2.01 0.04 - 17 2/2/2001 1:40 0.07 0.8 8% 0.57 0.02 2.05 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.472 0.04 0.12 2.07 0.04 _17 18 - 18 2/2/2001 1:50 0.06 0.8 8% 0.56 0.02 2.03 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.467 0.04 0.12 2.04 0.04 17 - 18 2/2/2001 2:00 0.07 0.8 8% 0.57 0.02 2.07 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.477 0.04 0.12 2.10 19 - 19 2/2/2001 2:10 0.07 0.8 8% 0.57 0.02 2.05 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.472 0.04 0.12 2.07 _0.04 0.04 18 - 18 2/2/2001 2:20 0.06 0.7 7% 0.55 0.02 2.00 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.462 0.04 0.12 2.01 17 - 17 2/2/2001 2:30 0.06 0.7_ 7% 0.53 0.02 1.91 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.440 0.04 0.11 1.89 _0.04 6. 33 14 - 14 2/2/2001 2:40 0.06 0.7 7% 0.53 0.02 1.94 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.446 0.04 0.11 1.92 0.03 14 - 15 2/2/2001 2:50 0.06 0.7 7% 0.53 0.02 1.91 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.440 0.04 0.11 1.89 0.03 14 - 14 2/2/2001 3:00 0.06 0.7 7% 0.55 0.02 2.00 1 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.462 0.04 0.121 2.01 0.04 17 - 17 2/2/2001 3:10 0.05 0.6 0.50 0.01 1.82 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.418 0.03 0.10 1.77 11 - 11 2/2/2001 3:20 0.05 0.6 _6% 6% 0.48 0.01 1.74 0.02 0.015 0.030 0.400 0.03 0.10 1.68 _0.02 0.02 9 - 10 2/2/2001 3:30 0.05 0.6 6% 0.49 0.01 1.79 0.02 0.015 0.030 0.412 0.03 0.10 1.74 0.02 10 - 11 2/2/2001 3:40 0.06 0.7 7% 0.52 0.02 1.89 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.435 0.04 0.11 1.86 13 - 13 2/2/2001 3:50 0.13 1.5 15% 0.81 0.05 2.88 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.674 0.08 0.19 3.18 _0.03 69 - 76 2/2/2001 4:00 0.05 0.6 6% 0.49 0.01 1.79 0.02 0.015 0.030 0.412 0.03 0.10 1.74 _0.17 0.02 10 - 11 2/2/2001 4:10 0.06 0.7 7% 0.52 0.02 1.89 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.435 0.04 0.11 1.86 0.03 13 - 13 2/2/2001 4:20 0.05 0.6 6% 0.50 0.01 1.82 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.418 0.03 0.10 1.77 11 - 11 2/2/2001 4:30 0.05 0.6 6% 0.51 0.01 1.84 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.423 0.03 0.11 1.80 _0.02 0.03 12 - 12 2/2/2001 4:40 _ 0.06 0.7 7% 0.53 0.02 1.94 0.03 0.0_15 0.030 0.446 0.04 0.11 1.92 14 - 15 2/2/2001 4:50 0.11 1.3 13% 0.73 0.04 2.60 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.606 0.07 0.16 2.80 _0.03 47 - 50 2/2/2001 5:00 _ 0.06 0.7 7% 0.53 0.02 1.91 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.440 0.04 0.11 1.89 _0.11 0.03 14 - 14 2/2/2001 5:10 0.06 0.7 7% 0.53 0.02 1.94 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.446 0.04 0.11 0.03 14 - 15 2/2/2001 5:20 0.06 0.7 7% 0.53 0.02 1.91 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.440 0.04 0.11 _1.92 1.89 6.03 14 - 14 2/2/2001 5:30 0.07 0.9 9% 0.61 0.02 2.20 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.507 0.05 0.13 2.26 0.05 24 - 25 2/2/2001 5:40 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.13 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.737 0.09 0.20 3.52 0.24 96 - 108 2/2/2001 5:50 0.11 1.3 13% 0.73 0.04 2.62 0.11 0.015 0.030 0.610 0.07 0.16 2.83 48 - 52 2/2/2001 6:00 _0.11 1.4 14% 0.76 0.04 2.71 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.630 0.07 0.17 2.94 _0.12 54 - 59 2/2/2001 6:10 0.13 1.6 16% 0.06 2.94 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.689 0.08 0.191 _ 3.26 _0.13 0.19 75 - 83 2/2/2001 6:20 0.14 1.7 17% _0.83 0.85 0.06 3.03 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.711 0.09 0.20 3.38 85 - 94 _2/2/2001 6:30 0.14 1.7 17% 0.84 0.06 3.00 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.704 0.09 0.19 3.34 _0.21 81 - 91 2/2/2001 6:40 0.30 3.6 36% 1.30 0.18 4.42 0.79 0.015 0.030 1.080 0.17 0.30 5.19 _0.20 0.93 356 - 418 2/2/2001 6:50 _ 0.16 1.9 19% 0.89 0.07 3.16 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.744 0.09 0.21 3.55 99 - 112 2/2/2001 7:00 0.19 2.3 23% 0.10 3.52 0.34 0.015 0.030 0.836 0.11 0.24 4.04 _0.25 0.39 151 -_173 2/2/2001 7:10 0.29 3.5 35% 0.17 4.34 0.74 0.015 0.030 1.057 0.16 0.30 5.09 0.87 332 - 390 2/2/20017:20 0.19 2.3 23% F1.27 0.10 3.53 0.34 0.015 0.030 0.839 0.11 0.24 4.05 0.39 153 - 175 2/2/2001.7:30 0.17 2.0 20% 3.29 0.26 0.015 0.775 0.10 0.22 3.72 115 - 131 2/2/2001 7:40 0.18 2.2 22% _0.08 0.09 3.42 0.30 0.015 _0.030 0.809 0.11 0.23 3.90 _0.29 0.34 135 - 154 2/2/2001 7:50 0.24 2.8 28% 1.12 0.13 3.91 0.50 0.015 _0.030 0.030 0.937 0.14 0.26 4.54 0.58 224 - 26011 U:\PROJECTSIKREBS SEWER\SBSEWER.XLS 2/9101 PAGE.4 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above PIRe invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/ s Flow cfs n I S P, ft I R, ft I R 2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/2/2001 8:00 0.31 3.8 38% 1.32 0.19 4.49 0.84 0.015 0.030 1.100 0.17 0.31 5.27 0.99 378 - 443 2/2/2001 8:10 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.29 0.26 0.015 0.030 0.775 0.10 0.22 3.72 0.29 115 - 131 2/2/2001 8:20 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.37 0.28 0.015 0.030 0.796 0.11 0.22 3.83 0.32 127 - 144 2/2/2001 8:30 0.30 3.7 37% 1.30 0.18 4.43 0.80 0.015 0.030 1.083 0.17 0.30 5.20 0.94 359 - 422 2/2/2001 8:40 0.18 2.2 22% 0.97 0.09 3.42 0.30 0.015 0.030 0.809 0.11 0.23 3.90 0.34 135 - 154 2/2/2001 8:50 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.34 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.789 0.10 0.22 3.79 0.31 123 - 140 2/2/2001 9:00 0.31 3.7 37% 1.31 1 0.18 4.45 0.81 0.015 0.030 1.088 0.17 0.30 5.22 1 0.96 365 - 429 2/2/2001 9:10 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.03 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.711 0.09 0.20 3.38 0.21 85 - 94 2/2/2001 9:20 0.33 3.9 39% 1.35 0.20 4.59 0.91 0.015 0.030 1.128 0.18 0.31 5.39 409 - 480 2/2/2001 9:30 0.19 2.3 23% 1.00 0.09 3.50 0.33 0.015 0.030 0.829 0.11 0.23 4.00 _1.07 0.37 147 - 168 2/2/2001 9:40 0.16 2.0 20% 0.92 0.08 3.24 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.765 0.10 0.21 3.67 0.28 110 - 124 2/2/2001 9:50 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.02 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.707 0.09 0.20 3.36 0.21 83 - 92 2/2/2001 10:00 0.14 1.6 16% 0.83 0.06 2.96 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.693 0.08 0.19 3.28 0.19 77 - 85 2/2/2001 10:10 0.29 3.5 35% 1.26 0.17 4.32 0.73 0.015 0.030 1.051 0.16 0.30 5.06 0.85 327 - 383 2/2/2001 10:20 0.13 1.6 16% 0.82 0.06 2.91 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.681 0.08 0.191 3.22 0.18 - 80 2/2/2001 10:30 0.13 1.5 15% 0.81 0.05 2.88 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.674 0.08 0.19 3.18 _72 69 - 76 2/2/2001 10:40 0.25 3.1 31 % 1.17 0.14 4.05 0.57 0.015 0.030 0.977 0.14 0.28 4.73 _0.17 0.67 257 - 300 2/2/2001 10:50 0.13 1.5 15% 0.80 0.05 2.87 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.670 0.08 0.18 3.15 0.17 68 - 75 2/2/2001 11:00 0.31 3.7 37% 1.30 0.18 4.44 0.81 0.015 0.030 1.085 0.17 0.30 5.21 0.95 362 - 425 2/2/2001 11:10 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.80 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.654 0.08 0.18 3.07 0.15 62 - 68 2/2/2001 11:20 0.27 3.3 33% 1.22 0.16 4.20 0.66 0.015 0.030 1.019 0.15 0.29 4.92 295 - 346 2/2/2001 11:30 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.74 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.638 0.07 0.17 2.98 _0.77 0.14 57 - 62 2/2/2001 11:40 0.11 1.3 13% 0.75 0.04 2.69 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.626 0.07 0.17 2.92 0.13 - 57 2/2/2001 11:50 0.10 1.2 12% 0.70 0.04 1 2.52 0.09 10.015 0.030 0.585 0.06 0.16 2.69 0.10 _53 - 4_4 2/2/2001 12:00 0.27 3.2 32% 1.21 0.15 4.16 0.63 0.0_15 0.030 1.007 0.15 0.28 4.87 0.74 _41 284 - 332 2/2/2001 12:10 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.69 0.03 2.46 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.572 0.06 0.151 2.61 0.09 - 40 2/2/2001 12.20 0.28 3.4 34% 1.24 0.16 4.27 0.70 0.015 0.030 1.036 0.16 0.29 5.00 0.82 _38 312 - 366 2/2/2001 12:30 0.15 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.06 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.718 0.09 0.20 3.42 0.22 88 - 98 2/2/2001 1240 0.25 3.0 30% 1.16_ 0.14 4.02 0.56 0.015 0.030 0.968 0.14 0.27 4.69 0.65 249 - 291 2/2/2001 12:50 0.10 1.2 _ 12% 0.72 0.04 2.57 1 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.597 0.06 0.16 2.76 0.11 44 - 48 2/2/2001 13:00 0.28 3.4 34% 1.24 0.16 4.26 0.69 0.015 0.030 1.033 0.16 0.29 4.99 0.81 309 - 362 2/2/2001 13:10 0.13 1.5 15% 0.80 0.05 2.87 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.670 0.08 0.18 3.15 0.17 68 - 75 2/2/2001 13:20 0.13 1.6 16% 0.82 0.06 2.91 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.681 0.08 0.19 3.22 72 - 80 2/2/2001 13:30 0.11 13% 0.74 0.04 2.66 0.11 0.015 0.030 0.618 0.07 0.17 2.87 _0.18 0.12 50 - 55 2/2/2001 13:40 0.10 _1.3 1.2 _ 12% 0.71 0.04 2.55 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.593 0.06 0.16 2.73_ 0.10 43 - 4_6 2/2/2001 13:50 0.27 3.2 32% 1.21_ 0.15 4.16 0.63 0.015 0.030 1.007 0.15 0.28 4.87 0.74 284 - 332 2/2/2001 14:00 _0.11 1.3 _ 13% 0.04 2.67 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.622 0.07 0.17 2.89 0.12 52 - 56 2/2/2001 14:10 0.24_ 2.9 29% _0.75 1.13 0.13 3.93 0.51 0.015 0.030 0.943 0.14 0.27 229 - 266 2/2/2001 14:20 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.83 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.662 0.08 0.18 _4.57 3.11_ _0.59 0.16 - 71 2/2/2001 14:30 0.24 2.9 29% 1.13 0.13 3.93 0.51 0.015 0.030 0.943 0.14 0.27 4.57 0.59 _65 229 - 266 2/2/2001 14:40 2/2/2001 14:50 0.10 1.2 12% 0.70 0.04 2.52 0.09 0.015 0.030 0.585 0.06 0.16 2.69 0.10 41 - 44 0.10 1.2 12% 0.70 0.04 0.04 2.50 2.71 0.09 0.12 0.015 0.015 0.030 0.030 0.580 0.630 0.06 0.07 0.16 0.17 2.66_ 2.94 0.09 40 - 42 2/2/2001 15.00 0.11 1.4 14% 0.76 0.13 54 - 59 2/2/2001 15:10 0.14 1.7 17% 0.84 0.06 2.99 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.700 0.09 0.19 3.32 0.20 80 - 89 U:\PROJECTS\KREBS-SEWER\SBSEWER.XLS 2tW1 PAGE 5 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above piRe invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft JR,ft R 2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/2/2001 15:20 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.82 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.658 0.08 0.18 3.09 0.16 64 - 70 2/2/2001 15:30 0.11 1.3 13% 0.74 0.04 2.64 0.11 0.015 0.030 0.614 0.07 0.17 2.85 0.12 49 - 53 2/2/2001 15:40 0.11 1.3 13% 0.74 0.04 2.66 0.11 0.015 0.030 0.618 0.07 0.17 2.87 0.12 50 - 55 2/2/2001 15:50 0.11 1.3 13% 0.74 0.04 2.64 0.11 0.015 0.030 0.614 0.07 0.17 2.85 0.12 49 - 53 2/2/2001 16:00 0.13 1.5 15% 0.80 0.05 2.87 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.670 0.08 0.18 3.15 0.17 68 - 75 2/2/2001 16:10 0.10 1.2 12% 0.71 0.04 2.55 0.10 10.015 0.030 0.593 0.06 0.161 2.73 0.10 - 46 2/2/2001 16:20 0.22 2.6 26% 1.08 0.12 3.77 0.43 0.015 0.030 0.900 0.13 0.25 4.36 0.50 _43 195 - 226 2/2/2001 16:30 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.75 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.642 0.07 0.18 3.00 0.14 58 - 63 2/2/2001 16:40 0.12 1.4 14% 0.76 0.05 2.72 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.634 0.07 0.17 2.96 0.13 56 - 60 2/2/2001 16:50 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.80 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.654 0.08 0.18 3.07 0.15 62 - 68 2/2/2001 17:00 6.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.77 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.646 0.07 0.18 3.03 0.14 _60 - 65 2/2/2001 17:10 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.96 0.08 3.38 0.29 0.015 0.030 0.799 0.11 0.221 3.85 0.33 129 - 147 2/2/2001 17:20 0.14 1.7 17% 0.84 0.06 2.99 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.700 0.09 0.19 3.32 0.20 80 - 89 2/2/2001 17:30 0.28 3.4 34% 1.25 0.16 4.28 0.70 0.015 0.030 1.039 0.16 0.29 5.01 0.82 315 - 369 2/2/2001 17:40 0.16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.07 3.18 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.747 0.10 0.21 3.57 0.25 101 - 114 2/2/2001 17:50 0.32 3.8 38% 1.33 0.19 4.51 0.86 0.015 0.030 1.105 0.17 0.31 5.30 1.00 384 - 451 2/2/2001 18:00 0.13 1.6 16% 0.82 0.06 2.91 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.681 0.08 0.19 3.22 0.18 72 - 80 2/2/2001 18:10 0.28 3.4 34% 1.24 0.16 4.25 0.68 0.015 0.030 1.030 0.16 0.29 4.97 0.80 306 - 359 2/2/2001 18:20 0.16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.07 3.19 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.751 0.101 0.21 3.59 0.26 103 - 116 2/2/2001 18:30 0.16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.07 3.18 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.747 0.10 0.21 3.57 0.25 101 - 114 2/2/2001 18:40 0.13 1.5 15% 0.80 0.05 2.85 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.666 0.08 0.18 3.13 0.16 66 - 73 2/2/2001 18:50 0.14 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.05 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.715 0.09 0.20 3.40 0.21 86 - 96 2/2/2001 19:00 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.10 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.729 0.09 0.201 3.48 0.23 93 - 104 2/2/2001 19:10 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.13 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.737 0.09 0.201 3.52 0.24 96 - 108 2/2/2001 19:20 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.22 0.24 0.0_15 0.030 0.758 0.10 0.21 3.63 0.27 106 - 120 2/2/2001 19:30 0.31 3.7 37% 1.31 0.18 4.45 0.81 0.015 0.030 1.088 0.17 0.30 5.22 0.96 365 - 429 2/2/2001 19:40 0.15 1.8 18% 0.89 0.07 3.15 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.740 0.09 0.21 3.54 0.24 98 - 110 2/2/2001 19:50 0.16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.07 3.19 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.751 0.10 0.21 3.59 0.26 103 - 116 2/2/2001 20:00 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.20 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.754 0.10 0.21 3.61 0.26 105 - 118 2/2/2001 20:10 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.29 0.26 0.015 0.030 0.775 0.10 0.22 3.72 0.29 115 - 131 2/2/2001 20:20 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.35 0.28 0.015 0.030 0.792 0.10 0.22 3.81 0.32 125 - 142 2/2/2001 20:30 0.16 2.0 20% 0.92 0.08 3.24 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.765 0.10 0.21 3.67 0.28 110 - 124 2/2/2001 20:40 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.22 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.758 0.10 0.21 3.63 0.27 106 - 120 2/2/2001 20:50 0.16 _ __ 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.23 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.761 0.10 0.21 3.65 0.27 108 - 122 2/2/2001 21:00 0.17 2.0 1.8 1.6 _ 1.6 _ 1.7 1.7 1.6 _ 5.8 _ 5.2 3.6 20% 0.93 0.08 _ 3.27 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.772 0.10 0.22 3.70 0.29 114 - 129 2/2/2001 21:10 0.15 18% 0.88 0.07 3.10 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.729 0.09 0.20 3.48 0.23 93 - 104 2/2/2001 21:20 0.13 16% 0.83 0.06 2.94 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.689 0.08 0.19 3.26 0.19 75 - 83 2/2/2001 21:30 0.13 16% 0.82 0.06 2.93 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.685 0.08 0.19 3.24 0.18 74 - 82 2/2/2001 21:40 _2/2/2001 21:50 2/2/2001 22:00 _2/2/2001 22:10 2/2/2001 22:20 2/2/2001 22:30 0.15 17% 0.86 0.06 3.06 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.718 0.09 0.20 3.42 88 -_98 0.14 17% 0.86 0.06 3.05 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.715 0.09 0.20 3.40 _0.22 0.21 86 - 96 0.13 _ 16% 0.83 0.06 2.94 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.689 0.08 0.19 3.26 0.19 - 83 0.49 58% 1.74 0.33 _ 5.60 1.85 1.51 0.015 0.015 0.030 0.030 1.449 1.340 0.23 0.21 0.37 0.36 6.41 6.12 2.12 1.75 _7_5 830 - 950 677 - 785 0.43 52% 1.61 0.29 5.28 0.30 36% 1.29 0.18 4.41 0.79 0.015 0.030 1.077 0.17 0.30 5.18 0.92 353 - 415 U:\PROJECTSWREBS SEWER%SBSEWER.XLS 2/9/01 PAGE 6 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above MRG invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft I R, ft R 2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/2/2001 22:40 0.28 3.3 33% 1.23 0.16 4.24 0.68 0.015 0.030 1.027 0.16 0.29 4.96 0.79 304 - 356 2/2/2001 22:50 0.14 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.05 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.715 0.09 0.20 3.40 0.21 86 - 96 2/2/2001 23:00 0.13 1.6 16% 0.81 0.05 2.90 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.677 0.08 0.19 3.20 0.17 - 78 2/2/2001 23:10 0.16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.07 3.19 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.751 0.10 0.21 0.26 _71 103 - 116 2/2/2001 23:20 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.03 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.711 0.09 0.201 _3.59 3.38 0.21 85 - 94 2/2/2001 23:30 0.30 3.6 36% 1.29 0.18 4.40 0.78 0.015 0.030 1.074 0.17 0.30 5.16 0.92 350 - 411 2/2/2001 23:40 0.25 3.0 30% 1.16 0.14 4.03 0.56 0.015 0.030 0.971 0.14 0.27 4.70 0.65 252 - 294 2/2/2001 23:50 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.10 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.729 0.09 0.20 3.48 0.23 93 - 104 2/3/2001 0:00 0.11 1.4 14% 0.76 0.04 2.71 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.630 0.07 0.17 2.94 54 - 59 2/3/2001 0:10 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.74 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.638 0.07 0.17 2.98 _0.13 0.14 57 - 62 2/3/2001 0:20 0.14 1.6 16% 0.83 0.06 2.96 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.693 0.08 0.19 3.28 0.19 77 - 85 2/3/2001 0:30 0.11 1.3 13% 0.75 0.04 2.67 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.622 0.07 0.17 2.89 0.12 - 56 2/3/2001 0:40 0.27 3.3 33% 1.22 0.16 4.20 0.66 0.015 0.030 1.019 0.15 0.291 4.92 0.77 _52 295 - 346 2/3/2001 0:50 0.10 1.2 12% 0.71 0.04 2.53 0.09 0.015 0.030 0.589 0.06 0.16 2.71 0.10 42 - 45 2/3/2001 1:00 0.10 1.2 12% 0.72 0.04 2.57 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.597 0.06 0.16 2.76 44 - 48 2/3/2001 1:10 0.31 3.8 38% 1.32 0.19 4.50 0.85 0.015 0.030 1.103 0.17 0.31 5.28 _0.11 1.00 381 - 447 2/3/2001 1:20 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.68 0.03 2.43 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.563 0.06 0.15 2.57 0.08 35 - 37 2/3/2001 1:30 0.10 1.2 12% _ 0.72 0.04 2.59 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.602 0.07 0.16 2.78 0.11 46 - 49 2/3/2001 1:40 0.29 _ 3.4 34% 1.25 0.17 4.30 0.71 0.015 0.030 1.045 0.16 0.29 5.04 0.84 321 - 376 2/3/2001 1:50 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.66 0.03 2.39 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.554 0.06 0.15 2.52 0.08 33 - 35 2/3/2001 2:00 0.11 1.3 13% 0.74 0.04 2.64 0.11 0.015 0.030 0.614 0.07 0.17 2.85 0.12 49 - 53 2/3/2001 2:10 0.19 2.3 23% 1.01 0.10 3.53 0.34 0.015 0.030 0.839 0.11 0.241 4.05 0.39 153 - 175 2/3/2001 2:20 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.69 0.03 2.46 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.572 0.06 0.15 2.61 0.09 38 - 40 2/3/2001 2:30 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.67 0.03 2.41 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.558 0.06 0.15 2.54 0.08 34 - 36 2/3/2001 2:40 0.21 2.5 25% 1.04 0.11 3.65 0.38 0.015 0.030 0.868 0.12 0.24 4.20 0.44 172 - 199 2/3/2001 2:50 0.09 1.0 10% 0.66 0.03 2.37 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.549 0.06 0.15 2.49 0.08 32 - 34 2/3/2001 3:00 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.66 0.03 2.39 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.554 0.06 0.15 2.52 0.08 33 - 35 3:10 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.69 0.03 2.46 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.572 0.06 0.15 2.61 0.09 38 - 40 _2/3/2001 2/3/2001 3:20 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.67 0.03 2.41 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.558 0.06 0.15 2.54 0.08 34 - 36 3:30 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.68 0.03 2.43 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.563 0.06 0.15 2.57 0.08 35 - 37 _2/3/2001 2/3/2001 3:40 0.11 1.3 13% _ 0.75 0.04 2.67 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.622 0.07 0.17 2.89 0.12 52 - 56 2/3/2001 3:50 0.09 1.0 10% 0.65 0.03 2.35 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.545 0.05 0.14 2.47 0.07 _ 31 - 33 2/3/2001 4:00 0.08_ 1.0 10% 0.64 0.03 2.31 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.536 0.05 0.14 2.4_2 29 - 31 2/3/2001 400 0.14 1.6 16% 0.83 0.06 2.96 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.693 0.08 0.19 3.28 _0.07 0.19 77 - 85 _2/3/2001_4:20 0.08 1.0 10% 0.63_ 0.03 2.27 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.526 0.05 0.14 2.36 0.06 27 - 2_9 _2/3/2001 4:30 0.08 1.0 10% 0.64 0.03 2.29 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.531 0.05 0.14 2.39 0.07 28 - 30 2/3/2001 4:40 0.08 1.0 10% 0.65 0.03 2.33 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.540 0.05 0.14 2.44 0.07 _ 30 - 32 2/3/2001 4:50 0.10 1.2 12% 0.72 0.04 2.57 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.597 0.06 0.16 2.76 0.11 44 - 48 2/3/2001 5:00 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.67 0.03 2.41 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.558 0.06 0.15 2.54 0.08 34 - 36 2 3/2001 5:10_ 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.68 0.03 2.43 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.563 0.06 0.15 2.57 0.08 35 - 37 2/3/2001 5:20 0.30 3.5 35% 1.27 0.17 4.36 0.75 0.015 0.030 1.062 0.16 0.30 5.11 0.88 338 - 397 2/3/2001 5:30 0.09---1.0 10% 0.66 0.03 2.37 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.549 0.06 2.49 0.08 32 - 34 2/3/2001 5:40 0.09 _ 1.0 10% _[_0.66_ 0.03 2.37 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.549 0.06 _0.15 0.15 2.49 0.08 32 - 34 2/3/2001 5:50 0.09 1.0 10% 0.65 0.03 2.35 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.545 0.05 0.14 2.47 0.07 31 - 33 U:\PROJECTSVCREBS SEWER\.SBSEWER.XLS 21=1 PAGE 7 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above i e invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft R, ft R 2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/3/2001 6:00 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.69 0.03 2.46 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.572 0.06 0.15 2.61 0.09 38 - 40 2/3/2001 6:10 0.10 1.2 12% 0.71 0.04 2.55 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.593 0.06 0.16 2.73 0.10 43 - 46 2/3/2001 6:20 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.83 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.662 0.08 0.18 3.11 0.16 - 71 2/3/2001 6:30 0.13 1.5 15% 0.80 0.05 2.85 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.666 0.08 0.18 3.13 0.16 _65 66 - 73 2/3/2001 6:40 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.79 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.650 0.07 0.18 3.05 0.15 61 - 67 2/3/2001 6:50 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.74 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.638 0.07 0.171 2.98 0.14 57 - 62 2/3/2001 7:00 0.11 1.3 13% 0.75 0.04 2.67 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.622 0.07 0.17 2.89 0.12 52 - 56 2/3/2001 7:10 0.16 1.9 19% 0.89 0.07 3.16 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.744 0.09 0.21 3.55 0.25 99 - 112 2/3/2001 7:20 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.29 0.26 0.015 0.030 0.775 0.10 0.22 3.72 0.29 115 - 131 2/3/2001 7:30 0.15 1.8 18% 0.87 0.06 3.08 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.722 0.09 0.20 3.44 0.22 89 - 100 2/3/2001 7:40 0.15 1.8 18% 0.89 0.07 3.15 0.22 10.01510.030 0.740 0.09 0.21 3.54 0.24 98 - 110 2/3/2001 7:50 0.32 3.8 38% 1.33 0.19 4.51 0.86 0.015 0.030 1.105 0.17 0.31 5.30 1.00 384 - 451 2/3/2001 8:00 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.96 0.08 3.38 0.29 0.015 0.030 0.799 0.11 0.22 3.85 0.33 129 - 147 2/3/2001 8:10 0.33 4.0 40% 1.37 0.20 4.64 0.95 0.015 0.030 1.142 0.18 0.32 5.45 1.11 425 - 499 2/3/2001 8:20 0.18 2.2 22% 0.97 0.09 3.42 0.30 0.015 0.030 0.809 0.11 0.23 3.90 0.34 135 - 154 2/3/2001 8:30 0.24 2.9 29% 1.14 0.13 3.94 0.52 0.015 0.030 0.947 0.14 0.27 4.59 0.60 231 - 269 8:40 0.18 2.2 22% 0.97 0.09 3.41 0.30 0.015 0.030 0.806 0.11 0.23 3.88 0.34 133 - 151 _2/3/2001 2/3/2001 8:50 0.21 2.5 25% 1.05 0.11 3.68 0.40 0.015 0.030 0.878 0.12 0.25 4.25 0.46 179 - 207 2/3/2001 9:00 0.36 4.3 43% 1.44 0.23 4.83 1.10 0.015 0.030 1.199 0.19 0.33 5.66 1.28 492 - 576 2/3/2001 9:10 0.19 2.3 23% 1.00 0.10 3.52 0.34 0.015 0.030 0.836 0.11 0.24 4.04 0.39 151 - 173 2/3/2001 9:20 0.23 2.8 28% 1.11 0.12 3.85 0.47 0.015 0.030 0.922 0.13 0.26 4.47 0.55 212 - 246 2/3/2001 9:30 0.27 3.3 33% 1.22 0.16 4.20 0.66 0.015 0.030 1.019 0.15 0.29 4.92 0.77 295 - 346 2/3/2001 9:40 0.34 4.0 40% 1.38 0.21 4.66 0.96 0.015 0.030 1.148 0.18 0.32 5.47 432 - 507 2/3/2001 9:50 0.19 2.3 23% 1.00 0.09 3.50 0.33 0.015 0.030 0.829 0.11 0.23 4.00 _1.13 0.37 147 - 168 2/3/2001 10:00 0.19 2.3 23% 1.00 0.10 3.52 0.34 0.015 0.030 0.836 0.11 0.24 4.04 0.39 151 - 173 2/3/2001 10:10 0.21 2.6 26% 1.06 0.11 3.71 0.41 0.015 0.030 0.884 0.12 0.25 4.28 0.47 183 - 212 2/3/2001 10:20 6.38 4.5 45% 1.47 0.24 4.92 1.17 0.015 0.030 1.227 0.19 0.34 5.76 1.37 526 - 616 2/3/2001 10:30 0.20 2.4 24% 1.02 0.10 3.58 0.36 0.015 0.030 0.852 0.12 0.24 4.12 0.41 161 - 186 _2/312001 10:40 0.21 2.5 25% 1.05 0.11 3.66 0.39 0.015 0.030 0.872 0.12 0.25 4.22 0.45 174 - 201 2/3/2001 10:50 0.36 4.3 43% 1.43 0.22 4.81 1.08 0.015 0.030 1.193 0.19 0.33 5.64 1.27 485 - 569 2/3/2001 11:00 0.36 4.3 43% 1.43 0.22 4.80 1.07 0.015 0.030 1.190 0.19 0.33 5.63 1.26 481 - 565 2/3/2001 11:10 0.24 2.9 29% 1.14 0.13 3.96 0.53 0.015 0.030 0.953 0.14 0.27 4.62 0.61 236 - 275 2/3/2001 11:20 _ 0.21 2.5 25% 1.06 0.11 3.69 0.40 0.015 0.030 0.881 0.12 0.25 4.27 0.47 181 - 209 2/3/2001 11:30 0.24 2.9 29% 1.13 0.13 3.93 0.51 0.015 0.030 0.943 0.14 0.27 4.57 0.59 229 - 266 2/3/2001 11:40 0.35 4.2 42% 1.41 0.22 4.76 1.04 0.015 0.030 1.179 0.19 0.33 5.59 1.22 468 - 549 2/3/2001 11:50 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.96 0.09 3.39 0.29 0.015 0.030 0.803 0.11 0.23 3.87 0.33 131 - 149 2/3/2001 12:00 _ 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.22 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.758 0.10 0.21 3.63 0.27 106 - 120 2/3/2001 12:10 0.30 3.7 37% 1.30 0.18 4.43 0.80 0.015 0.030 1.083 0.17 0.30 5.20 0.94 359 - 422 2/3/2001 12:20 0.21 2.5 25% 1.04 0.10 3.63 0.38 0.015 0.030 0.865 0.12 0.24 4.19 0.44 170 - 196 2/3/2001 12:30 0.21 2.5 25% 1.04 0.11 3.65 0.38 0.015 0.030 0.868 0.12 0.24 4.20 0.44 172 - 199 /2001 12:40 0.32 3.8 38% 1.34 0.19 4.54 0.88 0.015 0.030 1.114 0.17 0.31 5.33 1.03 - 462 /2001 12:50 /2001 13:00 r2/�3 0.17 2.0 20% 0.94 0.91 1.27 0.08 0.07 0.17 3.31 3.20 4.34 0.27 0.23 0.74 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.782 0.754 1.057 0.10 0.10 0.16 _0.22 0.21 3.76 3.61 0.30 0.26 0.87 _393 119 - 135 105 - 118 332 - 390 0.16 0.29 1.9 3.5 19% 35% /2001 13:10 0.30 5.09 U:%PROJECTSIKREBS_SEW ERISBSEW ER.XLS 2/9/01 PAGE 8OF24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above PIRe invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft I R, ft I R 2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/3/2001 13:20 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.23 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.761 0.101 0.21 1 3.65 0.27 108 - 122 2/3/2001 13:30 0.22 2.6 26% 1.07 0.11 3.74 0.42 0.015 0.030 0.894 0.13 0.25 4.33 0.49 190 - 220 2/3/2001 13:40 0.18 2.2 22% 0.98 0.09 3.44 0.31 0.015 0.030 0.816 0.11 0.23 _ 3.94 0.35 139 - 158 2/3/2001 13:50 0.21 2.5 25% 1.05 0.11 3.68 0.40 0.015 0.030 0.878 0.12 0.25 4.25 0.46 179 - 207 2/3/2001 14:00 0.15 1.8 18% 0.87 0.06 3.08 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.722 0.09 0.20 3.44 0.22 89 - 100 2/3/2001 14:10 0.20 2.4 24% 1.02 0.10 3.57 0.35 0.015 0.030 0.849 0.12 0.24 4.10 0.41 159 - 183 2/3/2001 14:20 0.16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.07 3.18 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.747 0.10 0.21 _ 3.57 0.25 101 - 114 2/3/2001 14:30 0.31 3.8 38% 1.32 0.19 4.50 0.85 0.015 0.030 1.103 0.17 0.31 5.28 1.00 381 - 447 2/3/2001 14:40 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.13 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.737 0.09 0.20 3.52 0.24 96 - 108 2/3/2001 14:50 0.22 2.6 26% 1.08 1 0.12 3.77 1 0.43 0.015 0.030 0.900 0.13 0.25 4.36 0.50 195 - 226 2/3/2001 15:00 0.15 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.06 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.718 0.09 0.20 3.42 0.22 88 - 98 2/3/2001 15:10 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.13 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.737 0.09 0.20 3.52 0.24 96 - 108 2/3/2001 15:20 0.15 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.06 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.718 0.09 0.20 3.42 0.22 88 - 98 2/3/2001 15:30 0.30 3.6 36% 1.29 0.18 4.39 0.77 0.015 0.030 1.071 0.16 0.30 5.15 0.91 347 - 467 2/3/2001 15:40 0.15 1.8 18% 0.89 0.07 3.15 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.740 0.09 0.21 3.54 0.24 98 - 110 2/3/2001 15:50 6.34 4.1 41 % 1.39 0.21 4.69 0.98 10.015 0.030 1.157 0.18 0.32 5.50 1.15 441 - 518 2/3/2001 16:00 0.15 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.06 0.20 10.01510.030 0.718 0.09 0.20 3.42 0.22 - 98 2/3/2001 16:10 _ 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.20 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.754 0.10 0.21 3.61 0.26 _88 105 - 118 2/3/2001 16:20 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.94 0.08 3.33 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.786 0.10 0.22 3.78 0.31 121 - 137 2/3/2001 16:30 0.32 3.8 38% 1.34 0.19 4.54 0.88 0.015 0.030 1.114 0.17 0.31 5.33 1.03 393 - 462 2/3/2001 16:40 _ 0.16 1.9 19% 0.89 0.07 3.16 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.744 0.09 0.21 3.55 0.25 - 112 2/3/2001 16:50 _ _ 0.27 3.3 33% 1.22 0.15 4.18 0.65 0.015 0.030 1.013 0.15 0.29 4.89 0.76 _99 290 - 339 2/3/2001 17:00 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.27 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.772 0.10 0.22 3.70 0.29 114 - 129 2/3/2001 17:10 0.33 4.0 40% 1.36 0.20 4.61 0.93 0.015 0.030 1.134 0.18 0.32 5.41 1.09 415 - 488 2/3/2001 17:20 _ 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.13 0.21 0.0_15 0.030 0.737 0.09 0.20 3.52 0.24 96 - 108 2/3/2001 17:30 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.37 0.28 0.015 0.030 0.796 0.11 0.22 3.83 0.32 127 - 144 2/3/2001 17:40 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.20 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.754 0.10 0.21 3.61 0.26 105 - 118 2/3/2001 17:50 _ 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.23 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.761 0.10 0.21 3.65 0.27 108 - 122 2/3/2001 18:00 _ 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.35 0.28 0.015 0.030 0.792 0.10 0.22 3.81 0.32 125 - 142 2/3/2001 18:10 _ 0.16 1.9 19% 0.89 0.07 3.16 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.744 0.09 0.21 3.55 0.25 99 - 112 2/3/2001 18:20 0.28 3.4 34% 1.24 0.16 4.25 0.68 0.015 0.030 1.030 0.16 0.29 4.97 0.80 306 - 359 2/3/2001 18:30 _ 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.12 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.733 0.09 0.20 3.50 0.24 94 - 106 2/3/2001 18:40 0.20 2.4 24% 1.02 0.10 3.57 0.35 0.015 0.030 0.849 0.12 0.24 4.10 0.41 159 - 183 2/3/2001 18:50 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.35 0.28 0.015 0.030 0.792 0.10 0.22 _ 3.81 0.32 125 - 142 2/3/2001 19:00 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.94 0.08 3.33 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.786 0.10 0.22 3.78 0.31 121 - 137 2/3/2001 19:10 _0.16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.07 3.18 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.747 0.10 0.21 3.57 0.25 101 - 114 2/3/2001 19:20 0 _ .16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.07 3.18 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.747 0.10 0.21 3.57 0.25 101 - 114 2/3/2001 19:30 0.27 3.2 32% 1.20 0.15 4.14 0.62 0.015 0.030 1.001 0.15 0.28 4.84 0.73 279 - 326 2/3/2001 19:40 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.12 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.733 0.09 0.20 3.50 0.24 94 - 106 2/3/2001 19:50 _ 0.26 3.1 31 % 1.19 0.15 4.10 0.60 0.015 0.030 0.989 0.15 0.28 4.79 - 313 2/3/2001 20:00 0.15 1.8 18% 0.89 1 0.07 1 3.15 0.22 10.015 0.030 0.740 0.09 0.21 3.54 _0.70 0.24 _268 98 - 110 2/3/2001 20:10 _ 0.33 3.9 39% 1.35 0.20 4.58 0.90 0.015 0.030 1.125 0.18 0.31 358 1.06 406 - 476 2/3/2001 20:20 0.15 1.8 18% _0.87 0.06 3.08 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.722 0.09 0.20 3.44 0.22 89 - 100 2/3/2001 20:30 0.31 3.8 38% 1.32 0.19 4.49 0.84 0.015 0.030 1.100 0.1710.311 5.27 0. 99 378 - 44311 U:%PROJECTSUKREBS SEWERZBSEWER.XLS 2/W1 PAGE 17 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION nge of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above DIRe invert: % Full Alpha radians AZa Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft R, ft R 2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs mated !Flo., feet inches 2/6/2001 7:20 0.25 3.0 30% 1.16 0.14 4.03 0.56 0.015 0.030 0.971 0.14 0.27 4.70 0.65 252 - 294 2/6/2001 7:30 0.32 3.9 39% 1.35 0.20 4.57 0.90 0.015 0.030 1.123 0.17 0.31 5.37 1.05 403 - 473 2/6/2001 7:40 0.30 3.7 37% 1.30 0.18 4.43 0.80 0.015 0.030 1.083 0.17 0.30 5.20 0.94 359 - 422 2/6/2001 7:50 0.19 2.3 23% 1.00 0.09 3.50 0.33 0.015 0.030 0.829 0.11 0.23 4.00 0.37 147 - 168 2/6/2001 8:00 0.19 2.3 23% 1.01 0.10 3.53 0.34 0.015 0.030 0.839 0.11 0.24 4.05 0.39 153 - 175 2/6/2001 8:10 0.23 2.8 28% 1.12 0.13 3.88 0.49 0.015 0.030 0.931 0.13 0.261 4.51 0.57 1219 - 255 2/6/2001 8:20 0.32 3.8 38% 1.33 0.19 4.52 0.86 0.015 0.030 1.108 0.17 0.31 5.31 1.01 387 - 454 2/6/2001 8:30 0.16 2.0 20% 0.92 0.08 3.26 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.768 0.10 0.21 3.69 0.28 112 - 126 2/6/2001 8:40 0.16 1.9 19% 0.89 0.07 3.16 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.744 0.09 0.21 3.55 0.25 99 - 112 2/6/2001 8:50 0.19 2.3 23% 1.00 0.09 3.51 0.33 0.015 0.030 0.833 0.11 0.23 4.02 0.38 149 - 170 2/6/2001 9:00 0.26 3.2 32% 1.20 0.15 4.13 0.61 0.015 0.030 0.998 0.15 0.28 4.83 0.72 276 - 323 2/6/2001 9:10 0.14 1.7 17% 0.84 0.06 3.00 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.704 0.09 0.19 3.34 0.20 81 - 91 2/6/2001 9:20 0.23 2.8 28% 1.11 0.12 3.86 0.48 0.015 0.030 0.925 0.13 0.26 4.48 1 0.55 214 - 249 2/6/2001 9:30 0.13 1.6 16% 0.82 0.06 2.91 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.681 0.08 0.19 3.22 0.18 72 - 80 2/6/2001 9:40 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.83 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.662 0.08 0.18 3.11 0.16 65 - 71 2/6/2001 9:50 0.31 3.7 1 37% 1.31 0.191 4.47 0.83 0.015 0.030 1.094 0.17 0.31 5.25 0.97 371 - 436 2/6/2001 10:00 0.16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.07 3.18 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.747 0.10 0.21 3.57 0.25 101 - 114 2/6/2001 10:10 0.24 2.9 29% 1.14 0.13 3.96 0.53 0.015 0.030 0.953 0.14 0.27 4.62 0.61 236 - 275 2/6/2001 10:20 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.03 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.711 0.09 0.20 3.38 0.21 85 - 94 2/6/2001 10:30 0.25 3.0 30% 1.15 0.14 3.99 0.54 0.015 0.030 0.959 0.14 0.27 4.65 0.63 242 - 282 2/6/2001 10:40 0.13 1.6 16% 0.81 0.05 2.90 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.677 0.08 0.19 3.20 0.17 71 - 78 2/6/2001 10:50 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.02 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.707 0.09 0.20 3.36 0.21 83 - 92 2/6/2001 11:00 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.30 0.26 0.015 0.030 0.779 0.10 0.22 3.74 117 - 133 2/6/2001 11:10 0.31 3.8 38% 1.32 0.19 4.50 0.85 0.015 0.030 1.103 0.17 0.31 5.28 _0.30 1.00 381 - 447 2/6/2001 11:20 0.12 1.4 14% 0.76 0.05 2.72 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.634 0.07 0.17 2.96 0.13 56 - 60 2/6/2001 11:30 0.18 2.2 22% 0.98 0.09 3.43 0.30 0.015 0.030 0.813 0.11 0.23 3.92 0.35 137 - 156 2/6/2001 11:40 0.10 1.2 12% 0.70 0.04 2.52 0.09 0.015 0.030 0.585 0.06 0.16 2.69 0.10 41 - 44 2/6/2001 11:50 0.12 1.4 14% 0.76 0.05 2.72 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.634 0.07 0.17 2.96 0.13 56 - 60 2/6/2001 12:00 0.30 3.6 36% 1.29 0.18 4.39 0.77 0.015 0.030 1.071 0.16 0.30 5.15 0.91 347 - 407 2/6/2001 12:10 0.13 1.6 16% 0.83 0.06 2.94 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.689 0.08 0.19 3.26 0.19 75 - 83 2/6/2001 12:20 0.11 _ 1.3 13% 0.74 0.04 2.64 0.11 0.015 0.030 0.614 0.07 0.17 2.85 0.12 49 - 53 2/6/2001 12:30 0.14 1.6 16% 0.84 0.06 2.97 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.696 0.08 0.19 3.30 0.19 78 - 87 2/6/2001 12:40 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.80 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.654 0.08 0.18 3.07 0.15 62 - 68 2/6/2001 12:50 0.32 3.8 38% 1.33 0.19 4.51 0.86 0.015 0.030 1.105 0.17 0.31 5.30 1.00 384 - 451 2/6/2001 13:00 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.77 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.646 0.07 0.18 3.03 0.14 60 - 65 2/6/2001 13:10 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.74 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.638 0.07 0.17 2.98 0.14 57 - 2/6/2001 13:20 0.34 4.1 41 % 1.38 0.21 4.68 0.98 0.015 0.030 1.154 0.18 0.32 5.49 1.15 _62 438 - 514 2/6/2001 13:30 0.14 1.6 16% 0.84 0.06 2.97 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.696 0.08 0.19 3.30 4.65 0.19 0.63 78 - 87 242 - 282 2/6/2001 13:40 0.25 3.0 30% 1.15 0.14 3.99 0.54 0.015 0.030 0.959 0.14 0.27 2/6/2001 13:50 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.77 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.646 0.07 0.18 3.03 0.14 60 - 65 2/6/2001 14:00 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.79 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.650 0.07 0.18 3.05 0.15_ 61 - 67 2/6/2001 14:10 2/6/2001 14:20 0.30 3.6 36% 14% 1.30 0.18 4.42 0.79 0.015 0.030 1.080 0.17 0.30 5.19 0.93 356 - 0.11 1.4 0.76 0.04 2.71 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.630 0.07 0.17 2.94 0.13 54 - 12-75- 2/6/2001 14:30 0.24 2.9 29% 1.14 0.13 3.96 0.53 0.015 0.030 0.953 0.14 0.27 4.62 0.61 236 - U:IPROJECTSUCREBS SEWERISBSEWER.XLS 2/W1 PAGE 9 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above i e invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft R, ft R 2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/3/2001 20:40 0.14 1.6 16% 0.83 0.06 2.96 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.693 0.08 0.19 3.28 0.19 77 - 85 2/3/2001 20:50 0.33 4.0 40% 1.37 0.20 4.64 0.95 0.015 0.630 1.142 0.18 0.32 5.45 1.11 425 - 499 2/3/2001 21:00 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.02 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.707 0.09 0.20 3.36 0.21 83 - 92 2/3/2001 21:10 0.16 2.0 20% 0.92 0.08 3.24 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.765 0.10 0.21 3.67 0.28 110 - 124 2/3/2001 21:20 0.14 1.7 17% 0.84 0.06 3.00 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.704 0.09 0.19 3.34 0.20 81 - _91 2/3/2001 21:30 0.16 1.9 19% 0.89 0.07 3.16 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.744 0.09 0.21 3.55 0.25 99 - 112 2/3/2001 21:40 0.16 1.9 19% 0.89 0.07 3.16 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.744 0.09 0.21 1 3.55 0.25 99 - 112 2/3/2001 21:50 0.29 3.5 35% 1.27 0.17 4.35 6.75 0.015 0.030 1.059 0.16 0.30 5.10 0.88 335 - 393 2/3/2001 22:00 0.13 1.6 16% 0.82 0.06 2.93 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.685 0.08 0.19 3.24 0.18 74 - 82 2/3/2001 22:10 0.19 2.3 23% 1.01 0.10 3.53 0.34 0.015 0.030 0.839 0.11 0.24 4.05 0.39 153 - 175 2/3/2001 22:20 0.13 1.5 15% _ 0.80 0.05 2.85 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.666 0.08 0.18 3.13 0.165 66 - 73 2/3/2001 22:30 0.29 3Z 35% 1.26 0.17 4.32 0.73 0.015 0.030 1.051 0.16 0.30 5.06 0.85 327 - 383 2/3/2001 22:40 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.02 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.707 0.09 0.201 3.36 0.21 83 - 92 2/3/2001 22:50 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.79 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.650 0.07 0.18 3.05 0.15 61 - 67 2/3/2001 23:00 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.02 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.707 0.09 0.20 3.36 0.21 83 - 92 2/3/2001 23:10 _ 0.28 3.3 33% 1.23 0.16 4.24 0.68 0.015 0.030 1.027 0.16 0.29 4.96 0.79 304 - 356 2/3/2001 23:20 0.11 1.3 13% 0.75 0.04 2.69 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.626 0.07 0.17 2.92 0.13 53 - 57 2/3/2001 23:30 0.33 3.9 39% 1.35 0.20 4.58 0.90 0.015 0.030 1.125 0.18 0.31 5.38 1.06 406 - 476 2/3/2001 23:40 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.75 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.642 0.07 0.18 3.00 0.14 58 - 63 2/3/2001 23:50 0.27 3.3 33% 1.22 0.16 4.20 0.66 0.015 0.030 1.019 0.15 0.29 4.92 0.77 295 - 346 2/4/2001 0:00 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.79 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.650 0.07 0.18 3.05 0.15 61 - 67 2/4/2001 0:10 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.13 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.737 0.09 0.20 3.52 0.24 96 - 108 2/4/2001 0:20 0.10 1.2 12% _ 0.72 0.04 2.59 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.602 0.07 0.16 2.78 0.1146 - 49 0:30 0.08 1.0 10% _ 0.65 0.03 2.33 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.540 0.05 0.14 2.44 0.07 30 - 32 _2/4/2001 2/4/2001 0:40 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.67 0.03 _ 2.41 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.558 0.06 0.15 2.54 0.08 34 - 36 0:50 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.68 0.03 2.43 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.563 0.06 0.15 2.57 0.08 35 - 37 _2/4/2001 2/4/2001 1:00 0.28 3.3 33% 1.23 0.16 4.21 0.66 0.015 0.030 1.021 0.15 0.29 4.93 0.78 298 - 349 2/4/2001 1:10 0.08 0.9 9% 0.61 0.02 2.22 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.512 0.05 0.13 2.29 0.06 25 - 26 2/4/2001 1:20 0.08 1.0 10% 0.63 0.03 2.27 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.526 0.05 0.14 2.36 0.06 27 - 29 2/4/2001 1:30 0.07 0.9 9% 0.60 0.02 2.17 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.502 0.05 0.13 2.23 0.05 23 - 24 2/4/2001 1:40 0.16 1.9 19% 0.89 0.07 3.16 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.744 0.09 0.21 3.55 0.25 99 - 112 _2/4/2001 1:50 _ 0.08 1.0 10% 0.64 0.03 2.31 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.536 0.05 0.14 2.42 0.07 29 - 31 2/4/2001 2:00 0.08 0.9 9% 0.62 0.03 2.24 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.517 0.05 0.13 2.31 0.06 26 - 27 2/4/2001 2:10 0.08 0.9 9% 0.62 0.03 2.24 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.517 0.05 0.13 2.31 6.06 26 - 27 2/4/2001 2:20 0.10 1.2 12% 0.72 0.04 2.59 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.602 0.07 0.16 2.78 0.11 46 - 49 2/4/2001 2:30 _ 0.09 1.1 11 % _ 0.68 0.03 2.43 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.563 0.06 0.15 2.57 0.08 37 35 - 37 _2/4/2001 2:40 0.09 _ 1.0 10% 0.65 0.03 2.35 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.545 0.05 0.14 2.47 0.07 31 - 33 2/4/2001 2:50 0.08 1.0 10% 0.64 0.03 2.31 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.536 0.05 0.14 2.42 0.07 29 - 31 2/4/2001 3:00 0.11 1.3 13% 0.75 0.04 2.69 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.626 0.07 0.17 2.92 0.13 53 - 57 2/4/2001 3:10 0.08 1.0 10% 0.63 0.03 2.27 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.526 0.05 0.14 2.36 0.06 27 - 29 2/4/2001 3:20 0.08 0.9 9% 0.63 0.03 2.26 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.522 0.05 0.14 2.34 0.06_ 27 - 28 2/4/2001 3:30 0.08 0.9 9% 0.63 0.03 2.26 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.522 0.05 0.14 2.34 _ 0.06 27 - 28 2/4/2001 3:40 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.68 0.03 2.43 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.563 0.06 0.15 2.57 0.08 35_- 37 2/4/2001 3:50 0.08 0.9 9% 0.61 0.02 2.22 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.512 0.05 0.13 2.29 0.06 25 - 26 U:IPROJECTSUCREBS SEWER\SBSEWERXLS 2/m1 PAGE 10 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above oiRe invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft R, ft R 2/3 Velocity ft/S Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/4/2001 4:00 0.07 0.9 9% 0.60 0.02 2.17 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.502 0.05 0.13 2.23 0.05 23 - 24 2/4/2001 4:10 0.07 0.8 8% 0.59 0.02 2.13 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.492 0.05 0.13 2.18 0.05 21 - 22 2/4/2001 4:20 0.06 0.8 8% 0.56 0.02 2.03 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.467 0.04 0.12 2.04 0.04 17 18 2/4/2001 4:30 0.22 2.7 27% 1.09 0.12 3.80 0.45 0.015 0.030 0.909 0.13 0.26 4.41 0.52 202 - 234 2/4/2001 4:40 0.07 0.8 8% 0.58 0.02 2.11 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.487 0.04 0.13 2.15 0.05 21 - 21 2/4/2001 4:50 0.07 0.8 8% 0.58 0.02 2.11 1 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.487 0.04 0.13 2.15 0.05 21 - 21 2/4/2001 5:00 0.08 0.9 9% 0.63 0.03 2.26 1 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.522 0.05 0.14 2.34 0.06 27 - 28 2/4/2001 5:10 0.07 0.8 8% 0.58 0.02 2.09 1 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.482 0.04 0.12 2.12 0.04 20 - 20 2/4/2001 5:20 0.08 0.9 9% 0.61 0.02 2.22 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.512 0.05 0.13 2.29 0.06 25 - 26 2/4/2001 5:30 0.07 0.9 9% 0.60 0.02 2.17 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.502 0.05 0.13 2.23 0.05 23 - 24 2/4/2001 5:40 0.13 1.5 15% 0.81 0.05 2.88 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.674 0.08 0.19 3.18 0.17 69 - 76 2/4/2001 5:50 0.07 0.8 8% 0.58 0.02 2.11 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.487 0.04 0.13 2.15 0.05 21 - 21 2/4/2001 6:00 0.07 0.9 9% 0.60 0.02 2.17 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.502 0.05 0.13 2.23 0.05 23 - 24 2/4/2001 6:10 0.07 0.9 9% 0.60 0.02 2.15 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.497 0.05 0.13 2.21 0.05 22 - 23 2/4/2001 6:20 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.68 0.03 2.43 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.563 0.06 0.15 2.57 0.08 _ 35 - 37 2/4/2001 6:30 0.10 1.2 12% 0.72 0.04 2.59 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.602 0.07 0.16 2.78 0.11 46 - 49 2/4/2001 6:40 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.80 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.654 0.08 0.18 3.07 0.15 62 - 68 2/4/2001 6:50 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.74 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.638 0.07 0.17 2.98 0.14 57 - 62 2/4/2001 7:00 0.10 1.2 12% 0.71 0.04 2.55 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.593 0.06 0.16 2.73 0.10 43 - 46 2/4/2001 7:10 0.11 1.3 13% 0.75 0.04 2.67 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.622 0.07 0.17 2.89 0.12 52 - 56 2/4/2001 7:20 0.10 1.2 12% 0.70 0.04 2.50 0.09 0.015 0.030 0.580 0.061 0.16 2.66 0.09 40 - 42 2/4/2001 7:30 0.12 1.4 14% 0.76 0.05 2.72 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.634 0.07 0.17 2.96 56 - 60 2/4/2001 7:40 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.12 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.733 0.09 0.20 3.50 _0.13 0.24 - 106 2/4/2001 7:50 _ 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.22 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.758 0.10 0.21 3.63 0.27 _94 106 - 120 2/4/2001 8:00 _ 0.16 2.0 20% 0.92 0.08 3.26 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.768 0.10 0.21 3.69 0.28 112 - 126 2/4/2001 8:10 _ 0.16 1.9 19% 0.89 0.07 3.16 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.744 0.09 0.21 3.55 0.25 99 - 112 2/4/2001 8:20 0.27 3.3 33% 1.22 0.16 4.19 0.65 0.015 0.030 1.016 0.15 0.29 4.91 0.76 292 - 342 _2/4/2001_8:30 _ 0.13 1.5 15% 0.80 0.05 2.87 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.670 0.08 0.18 3.15 0.17 68 - 75 2/4/2001 8:40 0.30 3.6 36% 1.28 0.17 4.37 0.76 0.015 0.030 1.065 0.16 0.30 5.13 0.89 341 - 400 _2/4/2001 8:50 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.03 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.711 0.09 0.20 3.38 0.21 85 - 94 2/4/2001 9:00 _ 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.96 0.09 3.39 0.29 0.015 0.030 0.803 0.11 0.23 3.87 0.33 131 - 149 2/4/2001 9:10 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.23 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.761 0.10 0.21 3.65 0.27 108 - 122 2/4/2001 9:20 2001 9:30 _ 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.37 0.28 0.015 0.030 0.796 0.11 0.22 0.31 3.83 0.32 127 - 0.31 3.7 37% 1.31 0.18 4.46 0.82 0.015 0.030 1.091 0.17 5.24 0.96 _1_44 368 - 432 _2/4/2001 9:40 0.18 2.2 22% 0.97 0.09 3.42 0.30 0.015 0.030 0.809 0.11 0.23 3.90 0.34 135 - 154 _2/4/2001 9:50 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.94 0.08 _ 3.33 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.786 0.10 0.22 3.78 0.31 121 - 137 2/4/2001 10:00 _ 0.30 3.6 36%_ 1.28 0.17 4.37 0.76 0.015 0.030 1.065 0.16 0.30 5.13 0.89 341 - 400 2/4/2001 10:10 _ 0.16 2.0 20% 0.92 0.08 3.26 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.768 0.10 0.21 3.69 0.28 112 - 126 2/4/2001 10:20 0.20 2.4 24% 1.02 0.10 3.57 0.35 0.015 0.030 0.849 0.12 0.24 4.10 0.41 159 - 183 2/4/2001 10:30 0.31 3.7 37% 1.31 0.19 4.47 0.83 0.015 0.030 1.094 0.17 0.31 5.25 0.97 371 - 436 4/200110:40 0.16 0.34 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.23 0.24 0.98 0.015 0.015 0.030 0.030 0.761 1.154 0.10 0.18 0.21 0.32 0.22 0.21 3.65 5.49 0.27 1.15 108 - 122 438 - 514 4/2001 10:50 4/2001 11:00 r4/2001 11:10 4.1 41% 1.38 0.21 4.68 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.37 0.28 0.015 0.030 0.796 0.11 3.83 3.61 0.32 127 - 144 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.20 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.754 0.10 0.26 105 - 118 U:IPROJECTSUCREBS_SEWER\.SBSEWER.XLS 2/9MI PAGE.11 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above PiRe invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft R, ft R 2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/4/2001 11:20 0.19 2.3 23% 1.00 0.09 3.50 0.33 0.015 0.030 0.829 0.11 0.23 4.00 0.37 147 - 168 2/4/2001 11:30 0.29 3.4 34% 1.25 0.17 0.71 0.015 0.030 1.045 0.16 0.29 5.04 0.84 321 - 376 2/4/2001 11:40 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 _4.30 3.13 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.737 0.09 0.20 3.52 0.24 96 - 108 2/4/2001 11:50 0.18 2.2 22% 0.98 0.09 3.44 0.31 0.015 0.030 0.816 0.11 0.23 3.94 0.35 139 - 158 2/4/2001 12:00 0.31 3.8 38% 1.32 0.19 4.49 0.84 0.015 0.030 1.100 0.17 0.31 5.27 0.99 378 - 443 2/4/2001 12:10 0.15 1.8 18% 0.87 0.06 3.08 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.722 0.09 0.20 3.44 0.22 89 - 100 2/4/2001 12:20 0.15 1.8 18% 0.87 0.06 3.08 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.722 0.09 0.20 3.44 0.22 89 - 100 2/4/2001 12:30 0.31 3.8 38% 1.32 0.19 4.50 0.85 0.015 0.030 1.103 0.17 0.31 5.28 1 1.00 381 - 4.4_7 2/4/2001 12:40 0.14 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.05 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.715 0.09 0.20 3.40 0.21 86 - 96 2/4/2001 12:50 0.18 2.2 22% 0.98 0.09 3.44 0.31 0.015 0.030 0.816 0.11 0.23 3.94 0.35 139 - 158 2/4/2001 13:00 0.15 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.06 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.718 0.09 0.20 3.42 0.22 88 - 98 2/4/2001 13:10 0..14 1.6 16% 0.83 0.06 2.96 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.693 0.08 0.19 3.28 0.19 77 - 85 2/4/2001 13:20 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.03 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.711 0.09 0.20 3.38 0.21 85 - 2/4/2001 13:30 0.14 1.7 17% 0.84 0.06 2.99 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.700 0.09 0.19 3.32 0.20 _94 80 - 89 2/4/2001 13:40 0.16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.07 3.18 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.747 0.10 0.21 3.57 0.25 101 - 114 2/4/2001 13:50 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.12 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.733 0.09 0.20 3.50 0.24 94 - 106 2/4/2001 14:00 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.80 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.654 0.08 0.18 3.07 0.15 62 - 68 2/4/2001 14:10 0.11 1.3 13% 0.74 0.04 2.66 0.11 0.015 0.030 0.618 0.07 0.17 2.87 0.12 50 55 2/4/2001 14:20 0.15 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.06 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.718 0.09 0.20 3.42 0.22 88 - 98 2/4/2001 14:30 0.16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.07 3.18 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.747 0.10 0.21 3.57 0.25 101 - 114 2/4/2001 14:40 6.17 2.1 21 % 0.94 0.08 3.33 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.786 0.10 0.22 3.78 0.31 121 - 137 2/4/2001 14:50 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.02 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.707 0.091 0.20 3.36 0.21 83 - 92 2/4/2001 15:00 0.16 1.9 19% 0.89 0.07 3.16 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.744 0.09 0.21 3.55 0.25 99 - 112 2/4/2001 15:10 0.13 1.6 16% 0.82 0.06 2.91 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.681 0.08 0.19 3.22 0.18 72 - 80 2/4/2001 15:20 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.77 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.646 0.07 0.18 3.03 0.14 60 - 65 2/4/2001 15:30 0.13 1.5 15% 0.80 0.05 2.85 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.666 0.08 0.18 3.13 0.16 66 - 7_3 2/4/2001 15:40 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.79 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.650 0.07 0.18 3.05 0.15 61 - 67 2/4/2001 15:50 0.30 3.6 36% 1.29 0.18 4.39 0.77 0.015 0.030 1.071 0.16 0.30 5.15 0.91 347 - 407 2/4/2001 16:00 _ 0.18 2.2 22% 0.98 0.09 3.44 0.31 0.015 0.030 0.816 0.11 0.23 3.94 0.35 139 - 158 2/4/2001 16:10 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.29 0.26 0.015 0.030 0.775 0.16 0.22 3.72 0.29 115 - 131 214/2001 16:20 _ 0.31 3.7 37% 1.31 0.18 4.46 0.82 0.015 0.030 1.091 0.17 0.31 5.24 0.96 368 - 432 2l4/2001 16:30 _ 0.13 1.6 16% 0.81 0.05 2.90 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.677 0.08 0.19 3.20 0.17 71 2/4/2001 16:40 0.22 2.7 27% 1.09 0.12 3.80 0.45 0.015 0.030 0.909 0.13 0.26 4.41 0.52 _78 202 - 234 2/4/2001 16:50 0.15 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.06 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.718 0.09 0.20 3.42 0.22 - 98 2/4/2001 17:00 0.21 2.5 25% 1.05 0.11 3.67 0.39 0.015 0.030 0.875 0.12 0.25 4.24 0.45 _88 177 - 204 2/4/2001 17:10 _ 0.14 1.7 17% 0.84 0.06 3.00 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.704 0.09 0.19 3.34 0.20 81 - 91 2/4/2001 17:20 0.14 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.05 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.715 0.09 0.201 3.40 0.21 86 - 96 2/4/2001 17:30 0.28 3.4 34% 1.24 0.16 4.26 0.69 0.015 0.030 1.033 0.16 0.29 4.99 0.81 309 - 362 2/4/2001 17.40 0.15 1.8 18% 0.89 0.07 3.15 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.740 0.09 0.21 3.54 0.2_4 98 - 110 2/4/2001 1750 0.35 4.2 42% 1.40 0.21 4.72 1.01 0.015 0.030 1.168 0.18 0.32 5.54 1.19 455 - 533 2/4/2001 18:00 0.16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.07 3.19 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.751 0.10 0.21 3.59 0.26 103 - 116 2%4/2001 18:10 _ 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.37 0.28 0.015 0.030 0.796 0.11 0.22 3.83_ 0.32 127 - 144 2/4I2001 18:20 0.35 4.2 42% 1.41 0.22 4.74 0.015 0.030 1.173 0.18 0.32 5.56 1.21 461 - 541 2/4/2001 18:30 0.18 2.2 22% 0.97 0.09 3.41 _1.03 0.30 0.015 0.030 0.806 0.11 0.23 3.88 0.34 133 - 151 U:XPROJECTSUCREBS SEWER\.SBSEWER XLS 2/9/01 PAGE 12 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above PIRe invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft R, ft R 2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs ed LFI feet inches 2/4/2001 18:40 0.19 2.3 23% 0.99 0.09 3.48 0.32 0.015 0.030 0.826 0.11 0.23 3.99 0.37 145 - 166 2/4/2001 18:50 0.36 4.3 43% 1.43 0.23 4.82 1.09 0.015 0.030 1.196 0.19 0.33 5.65 1.28 488 - 572 2/4/2001 19:00 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.20 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.754 0.10 0.21 3.61 0.26 105 - 118 2/4/2001 19:10 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.35 0.28 0.015 0.030 0.792 0.10 0.22 3.81 0.32 125 - 142 2/4/2001 19:20 0.20 2.4 24% 1.02 0.10 3.57 0.35 0.015 0.030 0.849 0.12 0.24 4.10 0.41 159 - 183 2/4/2001 19:30 0.33 4.0 40% 1.36 0.20 4.61 0.93 0.015 0.030 1.134 0.18 0.32 5.41 1.09 415 - 488 2/4/2001 19:40 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.12 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.733 0.09 0.20 3.50 0.24 94 - 106 2/4/2001 19:50 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.27 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.772 0.10 0.22 3.70 0.29 114 - 129 2/4/2001 20:00 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.22 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.758 0.10 0.21 3.63 0.27 106 - 126 2/4/2001 20:10 0.19 2.3 23% 1.01 0.10 3.53 0.34 0.015 0.030 0.839 0.11 0.24 4.05 0.39 153 - 175 2/4/2001 20:20 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.22 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.758 0.10 0.21 3.63 0.27 106 - 120 2/4/2001 20:30 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.10 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.729 0.09 0.20 3.48 0.23 _93 - 104 2/4/2001 20:40 0.31 3.8 38% 1.32 0.19 4.49 0.84 0.015 0.030 1.100 0.17 0.31 5.27 0.99 378 - 443 2/4/2001 20:50 0.14 1.6 16% 0.83 0.06 2.96 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.693 0.08 0.19 3.28 0.19 77 - 85 2/4/2001 21:00 0.14 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.05 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.715 0.09 0.20 3.40 0.21 86 - 96 2/4/2001 21:10 6.32 3.8 38% 1.33 0.19 4.51 0.86 0.015 0.030 1.105 0.17 0.31 5.30 1.00 384 - 451 2/4/2001 21:20 0.13 1.6 16% 0.82 0.06 2.91 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.681 0.08 0.19 3.22 0.18 72 - 80 2/4/2001 21:30 0.32 3.8 38% 1.34 0.19 4.54 0.88 0.015 0.030 1.114 0.17 0.31 5.33 1.03 9-3 - 462 2/4/2001 21:40 0.11 1.4 14% 0.76 0.04 2.71 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.630 0.07 0.17 2.94 0.13 54 - 59 2/4/2001 21:50 0.23 2.7 27% 1.10 0.12 3.84 0.47 0.015 0.030 0.919 0.13 0.26 4.45 0.54 209 - 243 2/4/2001 22:00 0.11 1.4 14% 0.76 0.04 2.71 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.630 0.07 0.17 2.94 0.13 54 - 5_9 2/4/2001 22:10 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.75 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.642 0.07 0.18 3.00 0.14 58 - 63 2/4/2001 22:20 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.75 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.642 0.07 0.18 3.00 0.14 58-- 63 2/4/2001 22:30 0.16 2.0 20% 0.92 0.08 3.24 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.765 0.10 0.21 3.67 0.28 110 - 124 2/4/2001 22:40 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.75 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.642 0.07 0.18 3.00 0.14 58 - 63 2/4/2001 22:50 0.12 1.4 14% 0.76 0.05 2.72 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.634 0.07 0.17 2.96 0.13 56 - 60 2/4/2001 23:00 0.11 1.4 14% 0.76 0.04 2.71 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.630 0.07 0.17 2.94 0.13 54 - 59 2/4/2001 23:10 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.83 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.662 0.08 0.18 3.11 0.16 65 - 71 2/4/2001 23:20 0.11 1.3 13% 0.73 0.04 2.60 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.606 0.07 0.16 2.80 0.11 47 - 50 2/4/2001 23:30 0.22 2.6 26% 1.07 0.11 3.74 0.42 0.015 0.030 0.894 0.13 0.25 4.33 0.49 190 - 220 2/4/2001 23:40 0.10 1.2 12% 0.70 0.04 2.50 0.09 0.015 0.030 0.580 0.06 0.16 2.66 6.09 40 - 42 2/4/2001 23:50 0.29 3.5 35% 1.26 0.17 4.33 0.73 0.015 0.030 1.054 0.16 0.30 5.08 0.86 329 - 386 2/5/2001 0:00 0.11 1.3 13% 0.73 0.04 2.60 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.606 0.07 0.16 2.80 0.11 47 - 50 2/5/2001 0:10 0.10 1.2 12% 0.72 0.04 2.59 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.602 0.07 0.16 2.78 0.11 46 - 49 2/5/2001 0:20 0.10 1.2 12% 0.72 0.04 2.59 0.10 10.01510.030 0.602 0.07 0.16 2.78 0. 11 46 - 49 2/5/2001 0:30 0.09 1.0 10% 0.65 0.03 2.35 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.545 0.05 0.14 2.47 0.07 31 - 33 2/5/2001 0:40 0.08 1.0 10% 0.65 0.03 2.33 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.540 0.05 0.14 2.44 0.07 30 - 32 2/5/2001 0:50 0.08 1.0 10% 0.65 0.03 2.33 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.540 0.051 0.14 2.44 0.07 30 - 32 2/5/2001 1:00 0.07 0.9 9% 0.60 0.02 2.17 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.502 0.05 0.13 2.23 0.05 23 - 24 2/5/2001 1:10 0.25 3.1 31 % 1.17 0.14 4.05 0.57 0.015 0.030 0.977 0.14 0.28 4.73 0.67 257 - 300 2/5/2001 1:20 0.07 0.9 9% 0.60 0.02 2.15 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.497 0.05 0.13 2.21 0.05 22 - 23 2/5/2001 1:30 0.07 0.8 8% 0.57 0.02 2.05 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.472 0.04 0.12 2.07 0.04 18 - 18 _ 2/5/2001 1:40 0.06 0.7 7% 0.54 0.02 1.96 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.451 0.04 0.11 1.95 0.03 15 - 1_5 2/5/2001 1:50 0.06 0.7 7% 0.55 0.02 1.98 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.456 0.04 0.12 1.98 0.04 16 - 16 U:\PROJECTS\KREBS-SEWER\.SBSEWER.XLS 2/9/01 PAGE 13 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above i e invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft R, ft nVelocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/5/2001 2:00 0.07 0.8 8% 0.57 0.02 2.05 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.472 0.04 0.12 2.07 0.04 18 - 18 2/5/2001 2:10 0.08 1.0 10% 0.65 0.03 2.33 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.540 0.05 0.14 2.44 0.07 30 - 2/5/2001 2:20 0.06 0.7 7% 0.54 0.02 1.96 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.451 0.04 0.11 1.95 0.03 _32 15 - 15 2/5/2001 2:30 0.06 0.7 7% 0.54 0.02 1.96 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.451 0.04 0.11 1.95 0.03 15 - 15 2/5/2001 2:40 0.06 0.7 7% 0.55 0.02 1.98 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.456 0.04 0.12 1.98 0.04 16 - 16 2/5/2001 2:50 0.06 0.7 7% 0.55 0.02 1.98 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.456 0.04 0.12 1.98 0.04 16 - 16 2/5/2001 3:00 0.05 0.6 6% _ 0.51 0.01 1.84 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.423 0.03 0.11 1.80 0.03 12 - 12 2/5/2001 3:10 0.05 0.6 6% 0.50 0.01 1.82 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.418 0.03 0.10 1.77 0.02 11 - 11 2/5/2001 3:20 0.05 0.6 6% 0.51 0.01 1.84 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.423 0.03 0.11 1 1.80 0.03 12 - 12 2/5/2001 3:30 0.06 0.7 7% 0.55 0.02 1.98 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.456 0.04 0.12 1.98 0.04 16 - 16 2/5/2001 3:40 0.06 0.7 7% 0.53 0.02 1.94 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.446 0.04 0.11 1.92 0.03 14 - 15 2/5/2001 3:50 0.06 0.7 7% 0.53 0.02 1.94 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.446 0.04 0.11 1.92 0.03 14 - 15 2/5/2001 4:00 0.06 0.8 8% 0.56 0.02 2.03 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.467 0.04 0.12 2.04 0.04 1 17 - 18 2/5/2001 4:10 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.23 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.761 0.10 0.21 3.65 0.27 108 - 122 2/5/2001 4:20 0.06 0.7 7% 0.55 0.02 2.00 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.462 0.04 0.12 2.01 0.04 17 - 17 2/5/2001 4:30 0.06 0.8 8% 0.56 0.02 2.03 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.467 0.04 0.12 2.04 0.04 17 - 18 2/5/2001 4:40 _ 0.06 0.7 7% 0.53 0.02 1.91 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.440 0.04 0.11 1.89 0.03 14 --14 2/5/2001 4:50 0.06 0.8 8% 0.56 0.02 2.03 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.467 0.04 0.12 2.04 0.04 17 - 18 2/5/2001 5:00 0.08 1.0 10% 0.65 0.03 2.33 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.540 0.05 0.14 2.44 0.07 30 - 2/5/2001 5:10 0.07 0.8 8% 0.58 0.02 2.11 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.487 0.04 0.13 2.15 0.05 _32 - 21 2/5/2001 5:20 0.08 1.0 10% 0.63 0.03 2.27 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.526 0.051 0.14 2.36 0.06 _21 27 - 29 2/5/2001 5:30 0.07 0.8 8% 0.57 0.02 2.05 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.472 0.04 0.12 2.07 0.04 18 - 18 2/5/2001 5:40 0.09 1.0 10% 0.65 0.03 2.35 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.545 0.05 0.14 2.47 0.07 31 - 33 2/5/2001 5:50 0.10 1.2 12% 0.70 0.04 2.50 0.09 0.015 0.030 0.580 0.06 0.16 2.66 0.09 40 - 42 2/5/2001 6:00 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.83 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.662 0.08 0.18 3.11 0.16 65 - 71 2/5/2001 6:10 0.13 1.6 16% 0.82 0.06 2.91 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.681 0.08 0.19 3.22 0.18 72 - 2/5/2001 6:20 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.34 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.789 0.10 0.22 3.79 0.31 _80 123 - 140 2/5/2001 6:30 0.18 2.2 22% 0.97 0.09 3.42 0.30 0.015 0.030 0.809 0.11 0.23 3.90 0.34 135 - 154 2/5/2001 6:40 0.23 2.7 27% 1.10 0.12 3.81 0.46 0.015 0.030 0.913 0.13 0.26 4.42 0.53 204 - 237 2/5/2001 6:50 0.20 2.4 _ 24% 1.02 0.10 3.58 0.36 0.015 0.030 0.852 0.12 0.24 4.12 0.41 161 - 186 2/5/2001 7:00 0.30 3.7 37% 1.30 0.18 4.43 0.80 0.015 0.030 1.083 0.17 0.30 5.20 0.94 359 - 422 2/5/2001 7:10 _ 0.34 4.0 40% 1.38 0.21 4.66 0.96 0.015 0.030 1.148 0.18 0.32 5.47 1.13 432 507 2/5/2001 7:20 0.32 3.9 39% 1.34 0.20 4.56 0.89 0.015 0.030 1.120 0.17 0.31 5.35 1.05 _ 399 - 469 2/5/2001 7:30 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.95_ 0.08 3.37 0.28 0.015 0.030 0.796 0.11 0.22 3.83 0.32 127 - 14_4 2/5/2001 7:40 _ 0.16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.07 3.18 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.747 0.10 0.21 3.57 0.25 10_1 - 114 2/5/2001 7:50 0.20 2.4 24% 1.03 0.10 3.60 0.36 0.015 0.030 0.855 0.12 0.24 4.14 0.42 _ 164 -_ 188 2/5/2001 8:00 0.37 4.5 45% 1.46 0.24 4.89 1.15 0.015 0.030 1.218 0.19 0.33 5.73 1.35 516 - 604 2/5/2001 8:10 0.19 2.3 23% 1.00 0.09 3.50 0.33 0.015 0.030 0.829 0.11 0.231 4.00 0.37 147 - 168 2/5/2001 8:20 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.34 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.789 0.16 0.22 3.79 0.31 123- 14_0 2/5/2001 8:30 0.34 4.1 41 % 1.38 0.21 _ 4.68 0.98 0.015 0.030 1.154 0.18 0.32 5.49 1.15 438 - 514 2/5/2001 8:40 0.17 2.0 20% 0.94 0.08 3.31 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.782 0.10 0.22 3.76 0.30 119_- 135 2/5/2001 8:50 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.22 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.758 0.10 0.21 3.63 0.27 106_- 120 2/5/2001 9:00 0.21 2.5 25% 1.06 0.11 _ 3.69 0.40 0.015 0.030 0.881 0.12 0.25 4.27 0 447 181_- 209 2/5/2001 9:10 0.18 2.2 22% 0.98 0.09 _ 3.44 0.31 0.015 0.030 0.816 0.11 0.23 3.94 0.35 _ 139 - 158 U:%PROJECTS%KREBS_SEWERISBSEWER.XLS 2/90001 PAGE 14OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above Wee invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S I P, ft JR,ft R 213 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/5/2001 9:20 0.15 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.06 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.718 0.09 0.20 3.42 0.22 88 - 2/5/2001 9:30 0.21 2.6 26% 1.06 0.11 3.71 0.41 0.015 0.030 0.884 0.12 0.25 4.28 0.47 _98 183 - 2/5/2001 9:40 0.15 1.8 18% 0.87 0.06 3.08 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.722 0.09 0.20 3.44 0.22 _212 89 - 100 2/5/2001 9:50 0.14 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.05 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.715 0.09 0.20 3.40 0.21 86 - 96 2/5/2001 10:00 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.27 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.772 0.10 0.22 3.70 0.29 114 - 129 2/5/2001 10:10 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.12 0.21 10.015 0.030 0.733 0.09 0.201 3.50 0.24 94 - 106 2/5/2001 10:20 0.32 3.8 38% 1.33 0.19 4.51 0.86 0.015 0.030 1.105 0.17 0.31 5.30 1.00 384 - 451 2/5/2001 10:30 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.22 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.758 0.10 0.21 3.63 0.27 106 - 120 2/5/2001 10:40 0.25 3.0 30% 1.16 0.14 4.02 0.56 0.015 0.030 0.968 0.14 0.27 4.69 249 - 291 2/5/2001 10:50 0.14 1.6 16% 0.84 6.06 2.97 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.696 0.08 0.19 3.30 _0.65 0.19 78 - 87 2/5/2001 11:00 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.83 1 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.662 0.08 0.18 3.11 0.16 65 - 71 2/5/2001 11:10 0.12 1 _4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.77 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.646 0.07 0.18 3.03 0.14 60 - 65 2/5/2001 11:20 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.77 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.646 0.07 0.18 3.03 0.14 60 - 65 2/5/2001 11:30 0.30 _ 3.5 35% 1.27 0.17 4.36 0.75 0.015 0.030 1.062 0.16 0.30 5.11 0.88 338 - 397 2/5/2001 11:40 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.69 0.03 2.46 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.572 0.06 0.15 2.61 0.09 38 - 40 2/5/2001 11:50 0.30 3.6 36% 1.29 0.18 4.39 0.77 0.015 0.030 1.071 0.16 0.30 5.15 0.91 347 - 407 2/5/2001 12:00 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.75 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.642 0.07 0.18 3.00 0.14 58 - 63 2/5/2001 12:10 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.80 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.654 0.08 0.18 3.07 0.15 62 - 68 2/5/2001 12:20 0.11 1.3 13% 0.73 0.04 2.60 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.606 0.07 0.161 2.80 0.11 47 - 50 2/5/2001 12:30 0.07 _ 0.8 8% 0.59 0.02 2.13 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.492 0.05 0.13 2.18 0.05 21 - 22 2/5/2001 12:40 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.67 0.03 2.41 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.558 0.06 0.15 2.54 _6. 88 34 - 36 2/5/2001 12:50 0.08 1.0 10% 0.64 0.03 2.31 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.536 0.05 0.14 2.42 0.07 29 - 31 2/5/2001 13:00 0.10 1.2 12% 0.72 0.04 2.59 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.602 0.07 0.16 2.78 0.11 46 - 49 2/5/2001 13:10 0.08 0.9 9% 31 % 17% 0.61 1.17 0.84 0.02 0.14 0.06 2.22 4.05 3.00 0.06 0.57 0.18 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.512 0.977 0.704 0.05 0.14 0.09 0.13 0.28 0.19 2.29 4.73 3.34 0.06 0.67 25 - 2_6 2/5/2001 13:20 0.25 3.1 257 - 30_0 2/5/2001 13:30 0.14 1.7 81 - 91 2/5/2001 13:40 0.15 1.7 17% 15% 0.86 0.06 0.05 3.06 2.80 0.20 0.14 0.015 0.015 0.030 0.030 0.718 0.654 0.09 0.08 0.20 0.18 3.42 3.07 _6.20 _0.22 0.15 88 - 98 62 --68 2/5/2001 13:50 0.12 1.5 2/5/2001 14:00 0.12 1.5 15% _0.79 0.79 0.05 2.80 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.654 0.08 0.18 3.07 0.15 62 - 68 2/5/2001 14:10 0.11 1.3 13% 0.73 0.04 2.62 0.11 0.015 0.030 0.610 0.07 0.16 2.83 0.12 48 - 52 2/5/2001 14:20 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.80 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.654 0.08 0.18 3.07 62 - 68 2/5/2001 14:30 0.11 1.3 13% 0.74 0.04 2.66 0.11 0.015 0.030 0.618 0.07 0.17 2.87 _0.15 0.12 _ 50 - 55 2/5/2001 14:40 0.11 1.3 13% 0.75 0.04 2.69 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.626 0.07 0.17 2.92 0.13 0.16 _53_- _ 57 65 - 71 2/5/2001 14:50 0.12 1.5 150/. 0.79 0.05 2.83 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.602 0.08 0.18 3.11 2/5/2001 15:00 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.79 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.650 0.07 0.18 3.05 0.15 _ 61 - 67 2/5/2001 15:10 0.28 3.3 33% 1.23 0.16 4.22 0.67 0.015 0.030 1.024 0.15 0.29 4.95 0.78 301 - 352 2/5/2001 15:20 0.11 1.3 3.8 13% 0.75 0.04 2.67 1 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.622 0.07 0.171 2.89 -0.12 52 - 56 2/5/2001 15:30 0.32 38% 1.33 0.19 4.52 0.86 0.015 0.030 1.108 0.17 0.31 5.31 1.01 387 - 454 2/5/2001 15:40 0.11 1.3 13% 0.75 0.04 2.69 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.626 0.07 0.17 2.92 0.13 53 - 57 2/5/2001 15:50 0.16 2.0 2.8 1.2 2.0 1.3 20% 0.92 0.08 3.26 0.25 0.015 6.030 0.768 0.10 0.21 3.69 0.28 112 - 126 219 - 255 001 16:00 0.23 010 28% 1.12 0.13 3.88 0.49 0.015 0.030 0.931 0.13 0.26 4.51 0.57 0016:10 r001 16.30 12% 0.71 0.04 2.53 0.09 0.015 0.030 0.030 0.589 0.765 0.06 0.16 2.71 0.10 0.28 42 - 450011:20 110 - 124 53 - 57 0.16 20% 0.92 0.08 3.24 0.25 0.015 0.10 0.21 3.67 0.11 13% 0.75 0.04 2.69 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.626 0.07 0.17 2.92 0.13 U:kPROJECTSUCREBS_SEWERSSBSEWER.XLS 2/Ml PAGE 15 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above PIRe Invert: %Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft R, ft R 2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/5/2001 16:40 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.75 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.642 0.07 0.18 3.00 0.14 58 - 63 2/5/2001 16:50 0.26 3.2 32% 1.19 0.15 4.12 0.61 0.015 0.030 0.995 0.15 0.281 4.81 0.71 273 - 319 2/5/2001 17:00 0.14 1.7 17% 0.84 0.06 2.99 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.700 0.09 0.19 3.32 0.20 80 - 89 2/5/2001 17:10 0.21 2.6 26% 1.06 0.11 3.72 0.41 0.015 0.030 0.887 0.13 0.25 4.30 0.48 186 - 215 2/5/2001 17:20 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.79 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.650 0.07 0.18 3.05 0.15 61 - 67 2/5/2001 17:30 0.13 1.6 16% 0.83 0.06 2.94 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.689 0.08 0.19 3.26 0.19 75 - 83 2/5/2001 17:40 0.31 3.8 38% 1.32 0.19 4.50 0.85 0.015 0.030 1.103 0.17 0.31 5.28 1.00 381 - 447 2/5/2001 17:50 0.13 1.5 15% 0.80 1 0.05 2.87 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.670 0.08 0.18 3.15 0.17 68 - 75 2/5/2001 18:00 0.31 3.8 38% 1.32 0.19 4.50 0.85 0.015 0.030 1.103 0.17 0.31 5.28 1.00 381 - 447 2/5/2001 18:10 0.13 1.5 15% 0.81 0.05 2.88 1 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.674 0.08 0.19 3.18 0.17 69 - 76 2/5/2001 18:20 0.22 2.7 27% 1.09 0.12 3.79 0.44 0.015 0.030 0.906 0.13 0.26 4.39 0.52 200 - 231 2/5/2001 18:30 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.35 0.28 0.015 0.030 0.792 0.10 0.22 3.81 0.32 125 - 142 2/5/2001 18:40 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.03 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.711 0.09 0.201 3.38 0.21 85 94 2/5/2001 18:50 0.33 4.0 40% 1.36 0.20 4.61 0.93 0.015 0.030 1.134 0.18 0.32 5.41 1.09 415 - 488 2/5/2001 19:00 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.94 0.08 3.33 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.786 0.10 0.22 3.78 0.31 121 - 137 2/5/2001 19:10 0.16 2.0 20% 0.92 0.08 3.26 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.768 0.10 0.21 3.69 0.28 112 - 126 2/5/2001 19:20 0.25 3.0 30% 1.15 0.14 4.00 0.54 0.015 0.030 0.962 0.14 0.27 4.66 0.63 244 - 285 2/5/2001 19:30 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.02 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.707 0.09 0.20 3.36 0.21 - 92 2/5/2001 19:40 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.10 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.729 0.09 0.20 3.48 0.23 _83 93 - 104 2/5/2001 19:50 0.30 3.7 37% 1.30 0.18 4.43 0.80 0.015 0.030 1.083 0.17 0.30 5.20 0.94 359 - 422 2/5/2001 20:00 0.21 2.5 25% 1.04 0.10 3.63 0.38 0.015 0.030 0.865 0.12 0.24 4.19 0.44 170 - 196 2/5/2001 20:10 0.16 1.9 19% 0.89 0.07 3.16 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.744 0.09 0.21 3.55 0.25 99 - 112 2/5/2001 20:20 0.34 4.0 40% 1.38 0.21 4.66 0.96 0.015 0.030 1.148 0.18 0.32 5.47 1.13 432 - 5_07 2/5/2001 20:30 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.23 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.761 0.10 0.21 _ 3.65 0.27 108 - 122 2/5/2001 20:40 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.22 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.758 0.10 0.21 3.63 0.27 106 - 126 2/5/2001 20:50 0.34 4.1 41 % 1.38 0.21 4.67 0.97 0.015 0.030 1.151 0.18 0.32 5.48 1.14 435 - 510 2/5/2001 21:00 0.13 1.6 16% 0.06 2.91 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.681 0.08 0.19 3.22 0.18 - 80 2/5/2001 21:10 0.13 1.6 16% _0.82 0.81 0.05 2.90 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.677 0.08 0.19 3.20 0.17 _72 --76 2/5/2001 21:20 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.03 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.711 0.09 0.20 3.38 0.21 _71 85 - 94 2/5/2001 21:30 0.13 1.6 16% 0.82 0.06 2.91 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.681 0.08 0.19 3.22 0.18 72 - 80 2/5/2001 21:40 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.82 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.658 0.08 0.18 3.09 0.16 64 - 70 2/5/2001 21:50 0.30 3.6 36% 1.29 0.18 4.40 0.78 0.015 0.030 1.074 0.17 0.30 5.16 0.92 350 - 411 2/5/2001 22:00 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.82 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.658 0.08 0.18 3.09 0.16 64 - 76 2/5/2001 22:10 0.31 3.7 37% 1.31 0.18 4.46 0.82 0.015 0.030 1.091 0.17 0.31 5.24 0.96 368 - 432 2/5/2001 22:20 0.13 1.6 16% 0.81 0.05 2.90 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.677 0.08 6. 99 _ 3.20 0.17 71 - 78 2/5/2001 22:30 0.28 3.4 34% 1.24 0.16 4.27 0.70 0.015 0.030 1.036 0.16 0.29 _ 5.00 0.82 312 - 366 2/5/2001 22:40 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.79 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.650 0.07 0.18 _ 3.05 0.15 61 - 67 2/5/2001 22:50 0.29 3.4 34% 1.25 0.17 4.29 0.71 0.015 0.030 1.042 0.16 0.29 5.03 0.83 318 - 373 2/5/2001 23:00 0.11 1.3 13% 0.04 2.69 0. 22 0.015 0.030 0.626 0.07 0.17 2.92 53 - 57 2/5/2001 23:10 0.11 1.3 13% _0.75 0.75 0.04 2.69 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.626 0.07 0.17 _ 2.92 _0.13 0.13 53 - 57 2/5/2001 23:20 0.12 1.4 14% 0.05 2.77 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.646 0.07 0.18 3.03 0.14 _ 60 - 65 2/5/2001 23:30 0.10 1.2 12% _0.78 0.04 2.59 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.602 0.07 0.16 2.78 0.11 46 -_49 2/5/2001 23:40 0.22 2.6 26% _0.72 1.08 0.12 3.77 0.43 0.015 0.030 0.900 0.13 0.25 4.36 0.50 195 - 2.26 47 - 50 2/5/2001 23:50 0.11 1.3 13% 0.73 0.04 2.60 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.606 0.07 0.16 _ 2.80 0.11 U:\PROJECTS%KREBS SEWERISBSEWER.XLS 2 CAI PAGE 16 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above PiRe invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n I S P, ft R, ft R 2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/6/2001 0:00 0.14 1.7 17% 0.84 0.06 2.99 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.700 0.09 0.19 3.32 0.20 80 - 89 2/6/2001 0:10 0.10 1.1 11 % 0.69 0.03 2.48 0.09 0.015 0.030 0.576 0.06 0.15 2.64 0.09 39 - 41 2/6/2001 0:20 0.08 1.0 10% 0.64 0.03 2.31 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.536 0.05 0.14 2.42 0.07 29 - 31 2/6/2001 0:30 0.08 0.9 9% 0.63 0.03 2.26 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.522 0.05 0.14 2.34 0.06 27 - 28 2/6/2001 0:40 0.10 1.2 12% 0.70 0.04 2.50 0.09 0.015 0.030 0.580 0.06 0.16 2.66 0.09 40 - 42 2/6/2001 0:50 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.66 0.03 2.39 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.554 0.06 0.151 2.52 0.08 33 - 35 2/6/2001 1:00 0.07 0.9 9% 0.61 0.02 2.20 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.507 0.05 0.13 2.26 0.05 24 - 25 2/6/2001 1:10 0.07 0.9 9% 0.61 0.02 2.20 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.507 0.05 0.13 2.26 0.05 24 - 25 2/6/2001 1:20 0.07 0.9 9% 0.61 0.02 2.20 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.507 0.05 0.13 2.26 0.05 24 - 25 2/6/2001 1:30 0.07 0.8 8% 0.57 0.02 2.07 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.477 0.04 0.12 2.10 0.04 19 - 19 2/6/2001 1:40 0.07 0.8 8% 0.58 0.02 2.09 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.482 0.04 0.12 2.12 0.04 20 - 20 2/6/2001 1:50 0.27 3.2 32% 1.20 0.15 4.14 0.62 0.015 0.030 1.001 0.15 0.28 4.84 0.73 279 - 326 2/6/2001 2:00 0.07 0.8 8% 0.57 0.02 2.05 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.472 0.04 0.12 2.07 0.04 18 - 18 2/6/2001 2:10 0.07 0.8 8% 0.57 0.02 2.05 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.472 0.04 0.12 2.07 0.04 18 - 18 2/6/2001 2:20 0.06 0.7 7% 0.55 0.02 2.00 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.462 0.04 0.12 2.01 0.04 17 -- 17 2/6/2001 2:30 0.06 0.7 7% 0.55 0.02 2.00 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.462 0.04 0.12 2.01 0.04 17 - 17 2/6/2001 2:40 0.08 1.0 10% 0.63 0.03 2.27 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.526 0.05 0.14 2.36 0.06 27 - 29 2/6/2001 2:50 0.06 0.7 7% 0.53 0.02 1.91 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.440 0.04 0.11 1.89 0.03 14 - 14 2/6/2001 3:00 0.06 0.7 7% 0.53 0.02 1.94 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.446 0.04 0.11 1.92 0.03 14 - 15 2/6/2001 3:10 0.06 0.7 7% 0.53 0.02 1.91 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.440 0.04 0.11 1.89 0.03 14 - 14 2/6/2001 3:20 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.67 0.03 2.41 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.558 0.06 0.15 2.54 0.08 - 36 2/6/2001 3:30 0.06 0.7 7% 0.53 0.02 1.94 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.446 0.04 0.11 1.92 0.03 _34 14 - 15 2/6/2001 3:40 0.06 0.7 7% 0.53 0.02 1.94 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.446 0.04 0.11 1.92 0.03 14 - 15 3:50 0.05 0.6 6% 0.51 0.01 1.87 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.429 0.03 0.11 1.83 0.03 12 - 13 _2/6/2001 2/6/2001 4:00 0.07 0.8 8% 0.57 0.02 2.05 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.472 0.04 0.12 2.07 0.04 18 - 18 2/6/2001 4:10 0.06 0.7 7% 0.52 0.02 1.89 0.03 0.015 0.030 0.435 0.04 0.11 1.86 0.03 13 - 13 2/6/2001 4:20 0.07 0.8 8% 0.59 0.02 2.13 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.492 0.05 0.13 2.18 0.05 21 - 22 2/6/2001 4:30 0.07 0.8 8% 0.58 0.02 2.09 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.482 0.04 0.12 2.12 0.04 20 - 20 2/6/2001 4:40 0.07 0.8 8% 0.57 0.02 2.07 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.477 0.04 0.12 2.10 0.04 19 - 19 2/6/2001 4:50 0.07 0.8 8% 0.58 0.02 2.11 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.487 0.04 0.13 2.15 0.05 21 - 21 2/6/2001 5:00 0.07 0.9 9% 0.60 0.02 2.15 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.497 0.05 0.13 2.21 0.05 22 - 23 2/6/2001 5:10 0.25 3.0 30% 1.16 0.14 4.03 0.56 0.015 0.030 0.971 0.14 0.27 4.70 0.65 252 - 294 2/6/2001 5:20 0.07 0.9 9% 0.60 0.02 2.15 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.497 0.05 0.13 2.21 0.05 22 - 23 2/6/2001 5:30 0.08 0.9 9% 0.61 0.02 2.22 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.512 0.05 0.13 2.29 0.06 25 - 26 2/6/2001 5:40 0.08 1.0 10% 0.64 0.03 2.29 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.531 0.05 0.14 2.39 0.07 28 - 30 2/6/2001 5:50 0.11 1.3 13% 0.75 0.04 2.67 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.622 0.07 0.17 2.89 0.12 52 - 56 2/6/2001 6:00 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.74 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.638 0.07 0.17 2.98 0.14 57 - 62 2/6/2001 6:10 0.27 3.3 33% 1.22 0.15 4.18 0.65 0.015 0.030 1.013 0.15 0.291 4.89 0.76 290 - 339 6:20 0.14 1.6 1.8 16% 0.84 0.06 2.97 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.696 0.08 0.19 3.30 0.19 78 - 87 94 - 106 _2/6/2001 2/6/2001 6:30 0.15 18% 0.88 0.07 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.733 0.09 0.20 3.50 0.24 2/6/2001 6:40 _2/6/2001 6:50 0.35 4.1 2.7 41 % 1.40 0.21 _3.12 4.71 1.01 0.015 0.030 1.165 0.18 0.32 5.53 1.18 451 - 530 209 - 243 0.23 27% 1.10 0.12 3.84 0.47 0.015 0.030 0.919 0.26 4.45#00. _2/6/2001 7:00 2/6/2001 7:10 0.21 2.5 2.7 25% 1.05 0.11 3.68 0.40 0.015 0.030 0.8781_0.12 _0.13 0.25 4.25_1_79_ - _207 - 229 0.22 _ 27% 1.08 0.12 _ 3.78 0.44 0.015 0.030 0.9030.13 0.26 4.38197 U:\PROJECTS\KREBS-SEWER\SBSEWER.XLS 2/9/01 PAGE 18 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above i e invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft R, ft R 2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/6/2001 14:40 0.13 1.5 15% 0.81 0.05 2.88 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.674 0.08 0.19 3.18 69 - 76 2/6/2001 14:50 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.77 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.646 0.07 0.18 3.03 _0.17 0.14 60 - 65 2/6/2001 15:00 0.31 3.8 38% 1.32 0.19 4.49 0.84 0.015 0.030 1.100 0.17 0.31 5.27 0.99 378 - 443 2/6/2001 15:10 0.11 1.3 13% 0.75 0.04 2.67 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.622 0.07 0.17 2.89 0.12 52 - 56 2/6/2001 15:20 0.15 1.8 18% 0.87 0.07 3.09 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.726 0.09 0.20 3.46 0.23 91 - 102 2/6/2001 15:30 0.21 2.6 26% 1.06 0.11 3.71 0.41 0.015 0.030 0.884 0.12 0.25 4.28 0.47 183 - 212 2/6/2001 15:40 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.77 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.646 0.07 0.18 3.03 0.14 60 - 65 2/6/2001 15:50 0.29 3.5 35% 1.26 0.17 4.32 0.73 0.015 0.030 1.051 0.16 0.30 5.06 0.85 327 - 383 2/6/2001 16:00 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.74 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.638 0.071 0.17 2.98 0.14 57 - 62 2/6/2001 16:10 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.80 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.654 0.08 0.18 3.07 0.15 62 - 68 2/6/2001 16:20 0.18 2.2 22% 0.98 0.09 3.44 0.31 0.015 0.030 0.816 0.11 0.23 3.94 0.35 139 - 158 2/6/2001 16:30 0.31 3.7 37% 1.31 0.18 4.45 0.81 0.015 0.030 1.088 0.17 0.30 5.22 0.96 365 - 429 2/6/2001 16:40 0.13 1.5 15% 0.81 0.05 2.88 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.674 0.08 0.19 3.18 0.17 69 - 76 2/6/2001 16:50 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.27 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.772 0.10 0.221 3.70 0.29 114 - 129 2/6/2001 17:00 0.14 1.6 16% 0.83 0.06 2.96 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.693 0.08 0.19 3.28 0.19 77 - 85 2/6/2001 17:10 0.13 1.6 16% 0.82 0.06 2.93 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.685 0.08 0.19 3.24 0.18 74 - 82 2/6/2001 17:20 0.30 3.6 36% 1.28 0.17 4.37 0.76 0.015 0.030 1.065 0.16 0.30 5.13 0.89 3_41 - 400 2/6/2001 17:30 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.13 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.737 0.09 0.20 3.52 0.24 96 - 108 2/6/2001 17:40 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.23 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.761 0.10 0.21 3.65 0.27 108 - 122 2/6/2001 17:50 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.071 3.13 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.737 0.09 0.20 3.52 0.24 96 - 108 2/6/2001 18:00 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.29 0.26 0.015 0.030 0.775 0.10 0.22 3.72 0.29 115 - 131 2/6/2001 18:10 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.34 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.789 0.10 0.221 3.79 0.31 123 - 140 18:20 0.24 2.8 28% 1.12 0.13 3.89 0.49 0.015 0.030 0.934 0.14 0.26 4.53 0.57 221 - 257 _2/6/2001 2/6/2001 18:30 0.16 2.0 20% 0.92 0.08 3.26 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.768 0.10 0.21 3.69 0.28 112 - 126 2/6/2001 18:40 0.25 3.1 31 % 1.17 0.14 4.05 0.57 0.015 0.030 0.977 0.14 0.28 4.73 0.67 257 - 300 2/6/2001 18:50 0.15 1.8 18% 0.89 0.07 3.15 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.740 0.09 0.21 3.54 0.24 98 - 110 2/6/2001 19:00 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.22 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.758 0.10 0.21 3.63 0.27 106 - 120_ 2/6/2001 19:10 0.32 3.9 39% 1.34 0.20 4.56 0.89 0.015 0.030 1.120 0.17 0.31 5.35 1.05 399 - 469 19:20 _ 0.21 2.5 25% 1.04 0.11 3.65 0.38 0.015 0.030 0.868 0.12 0.24 4.20 0.44 172 - 199 _2/6J2001 2/6/2001 19:30 0.20 2.4 24% 1.02 0.10 3.58 0.36 0.015 0.030 0.852 0.12 0.24 4.12 0.41 161 - 186 2/6/2001 19:40 0.31 3.8 38% 1.32 0.19 4.49 0.84 0.015 0.030 1.100 0.17 0.31 5.27 0.99 378 - 443 2/6/2001 19:50 0.16 2.0 20% 0.92 0.08 3.26 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.768 0.10 0.21 3.69 0.28 112 - 126 2/6/2001 20:00 0.16 2.0 20% 0.92 0.08 3.26 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.768 0.10 0.21 0.28 112 - 126 2/6/2001 20:10 0.33 3.9 39% 1.35 0.20 4.58 0.90 0.015 0.030 1.125 0.18 0.31 _3.69 1.06 406 - 476 2/6/2001 20:20 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.10 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.729 0.09 0.20 _5.38 3.48 0.23 93 - 104 _2/6/2001 20:30 0.14 1.6 16% 0.83 0.06 2.96 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.693 0.08 0.19 3.28 0.19 77 - 85 2/6/2001 20:40 0.33 3.9 39% 1.35 0.20 4.58 0.90 0.015 0.030 1.125 0.18 0.31 1.06 406 - 476 2/6/2001 20:50 0.13 1.6 16% 0.82 0.06 2.91 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.681 0.08 0.19 _5.38 0.18 72 - 80 _2/6/2001 21:00 0.15 1.8 18% 0.87 0.06 3.08 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.722 0.09 0.20 _3.22 3.44 0.22 89 - 100 2/6/2001 21:10 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.83 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.662 0.08 0.18 3.11 0.16 65 - 71 2J6/2001 21:20 0.15 1.8 18% 0.07 3.12 0.21 10.015 0.030 0,733 0.09 0.20 0.24 94 - 106 2/6/2001 21:30 0.29 3.5 35% _0.88 1.27 0.17 4.35 0.75 0.015 0.030 1.059 0.16 0.30 _3.50 0.88 335 - 393 2/6/2001 21:40 0.13 1.6 16% 0.83 0.06 2.94 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.689 0.08 0.19 _5.10 0.19 75 - 83 2/6/2001 21:50 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.10 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.729 0.09 0.20 _3.26 3.48 0.23 93 - 104 U:\PROJECTSUCREBS SEWERISBSEWER.XLS 2/9/01 PAGE 19 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above i e invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft R, ft R 2/3 Velocity ftls Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/6/2001 22:00 0.26 3.1 31 % 1.18 0.14 4.06 0.58 0.015 0.030 0.980 0.15 0.281 4.74 0.68 260 - 303 2/6/2001 22:10 0.13 1.5 15% 0.80 0.05 2.87 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.670 0.08 0.18 3.15 0.17 68 - 75 2/6/2001 22:20 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.96 0.09 3.39 0.29 0.015 0.030 0.803 0.11 0.23 3.87 0.33 131 - 149 2/6/2001 22:30 0.14 1.7 17% 0.84 0.06 3.00 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.704 0.09 0.19 3.34 0.2081 - 91 2/6/2001 22:40 0.13 1.5 15% 0.81 0.05 2.88 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.674 0.08 0.19 3.18 0.17 69 - 76 2/6/2001 22:50 0.13 1.6 16% 0.82 0.06 2.93 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.685 0.08 0.19 3.24 0.18 74 - 82 2/6/2001 23:00 0.11 1.3 13% 0.75 0.04 2.67 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.622 0.07 0.17 2.89 0.12 52 - 56 2/6/2001 23:10 0.10 1.2 12% 0.71 0.04 2.55 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.593 0.06 0.16 2.73 0.10 43 - 46 2/6/2001 23:20 0.10 1.2 12% 0.72 0.04 2.57 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.597 0.06 0.16 2.76 0.11 44 - 48 2/6/2001 23:30 0.11 1.3 13% 0.74 0.04 2.64 0.11 0.015 0.030 0.614 0.07 0.17 2.85 0.12 49 - 53 2/6/2001 23:40 0.11 1.3 13% 0.75 0.04 2.67 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.622 0.07 0.17 2.89 0.12 52 - 56 2/6/2001 23:50 0.12 1..5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.82 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.658 0.08 0.18 3.09 0.16 64 - 70 2/7/2001 0:00 0.11 1.3 13% 0.74 0.04 2.64 0.11 0.015 0.030 0.614 0.07 0.17 2.85 0.12 49 - 53 2/7/2001 0:10 0.11 1.3 13% 0.74 0.04 2.64 0.11 0.015 0.030 0.614 0.07 0.17 2.85 0.12 49 - 53 0:20 0.10 1.2 12% 0.71 0.04 2.53 0.09 0.015 0.030 0.589 0.06 0.16 2.71 0.10 42 - 45 _2/7/2001 2/7/2001 0:30 0.08 1.0 10% 0.64 0.03 2.31 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.536 0.05 0.14 2.42 0.07 29 - 31 2/7/2001 0:40 0.08 1.0 10% 0.64 0.03 2.31 0.07 10.01510.030 0.536 0.05 0.141 2.42 0.07 29 - 31 2/7/2001 0:50 0.08 1.0 10% 0.64 0.03 2.31 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.536 0.05 0.14 2.42 0.07 29 - 31 2/7/2001 1:00 0.14 1.6 16% 0.84 0.06 2.97 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.696 0.08 0.19 3.30 0.19 78 - 87 2/7/2001 1:10 0.07 0.9 9% 0.61 0.02 2.20 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.507 0.05 0.13 2.26 0.05 24 - 25 2/7/2001 1:20 0.12 _ 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.83 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.662 0.08 0.18 3.11 0.16 65 - 71 2/7/2001 1:30 0.07 0.9 9% 0.60 0.02 2.17 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.502 0.05 0.13 2.23 0.05 23 - 24 2/7/2001 1:40 0.14 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.05 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.715 0.09 0.20 3.40 0.21 - 96 2/7/2001 1:50 _ 0.08 0.9 9% 0.61 1 0.02 2.22 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.512 0.05 0.13 2.29 0.06 _86 - 26 2/7/2001 2:00 0.07 0.8 8% 0.58 0.02 2.11 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.487 0.04 0.13 0.05 _25 21 - 21 2/7/2001 2:10 0.12 _ 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.74 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.638 0.07 0.17 _2.15 2.98 0.14 - 62 _2/7/2001 2:20 0.06 0.7 7% 0.55 0.021 2.00 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.462 0.04 0.12 2.01 0.04 _57 17 - 17 2/7/2001 2:30 0.06 0.7 7% 0.55 0.02 2.00 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.462 0.04 0.12 2.01 0.04 17 - 17 2/7/2001 2:40 0.06 _ 0.8 8% 0.56 0.02 2.03 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.467 0.04 0.12 2.04 0.04 17 - 18 _2/7/2001 2:50 0.07 0.8 8% 0.57 0.02 2.05 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.472 0.04 0.12 2.07 0.04 18 - 18 2/7/2001 3:00 0.12 _ 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.79 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.650 0.07 0.18 3.05 0.15 61 - 67 2/7/2001 3:10 0.07 0.8 89/. 0.57 0.02 2.05 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.472 0.04 0.12 2.07 0.04 18 - 18 2/7/2001 3:20 0.06 0.7 7% 0.55 0.02 2.00 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.462 0.04 0.04 0.12 0.12 2.01 2.10 0.04 0.04 17 - 17 19 - 19 2/7/2001 3:30 0.07 0.8 _ 8% 0.57 0.02 2.07 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.477 2/7/2001 3:40 0.07 0.8 80/6 0.58 0.02 2.11 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.487 0.04 0.13 2.15 0.05 21 - 21 2/7/2001 3:50 0.07 0.8 8% 0.58 0.02 2.09 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.482 0.04 0.12 2.12 0.04 20_ 20 2/7/2001 4:00 0.06 0.7 7% 0.55 0.02 2.00 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.462 0.04 0.12 2.01 0.04 17 - 17 2/7/2001 4:10 0.12 1.4 14% 8% 0.78 0.56 0.05 0.02 2.79 2.03 0.14 0.04 0.015 0.015 0.030 0.030 0.650 0.467 0.07 0.04 0.18 0.12 3.05 2.04 0.15 0.04 _61 - 67 -IT.-18 18 _2/7_/2001 420 0.06 0.8 2/7/2001 4:30 0.07 0.8 8% 0.57 0.02 2.05 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.472 0.04 0.12 2.07 0.04 18 - 18 217/2001 4:40 0.07 0.8 8% 0.58 0.02 2.09 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.482 0.04 0.12 2.12 0.04 20 - 20 2/7/2001 4:50 0.07 0.8 89/6 25% 0.58 1.04 0.02 0.11 2.11 3.65 0.05 0.38 0.015 0.015 0.030 0.030 0.487 0.868 0.04 0.12 0.13 0.24 2.15 4.20 0.05 0.44 21 - 21 172 - 199 2/7/2001 5:00 0.21 2.5 2/7/2001 5:10 0.07 0.8 8°/a 0.57 0.02 2.07 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.477 0.04 0.12 2.10 0.04 19 - 19 U:TROJECTSUCREBS SEWERISBSEWER.XLS 2/9/01 PAGE 20 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above PIRe invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow I cfs n E P, ft R, ft R 2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/7/2001 5:20 0.08 0.9 9% 0.63 0.03 2.26 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.522 0.05 0.14 2.34 0.06 27 - 28 2/7/2001 5:30 0.08 0.9 9% 0.63 0.03 2.26 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.522 0.05 0.14 2.34 0.06 27 - 28 2/7/2001 5:40 0.30 3.6 36% 1.29 0.18 4.39 0.77 0.015 0.030 1.071 0.16 0.30 5.15 0.91 347 - 407 2/7/2001 5:50 0.10 1.2 12% 0.72 0.04 2.59 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.602 0.07 0.16 2.78 0.11 46 - 49 2/7/2001 6:00 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.79 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.650 0.07 0.18 3.05 0.15 61 - 67 2/7/2001 6:10 0.19 2.3 23% 0.99 0.09 3.48 0.32 0.015 0.030 0.826 0.11 0.23 3.99 0.37 145 - 166 2/7/2001 6:20 0.13 1.6 16% 0.81 0.05 2.90 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.677 0.08 0.191 3.20 0.17 71 - 78 2/7/2001 6:30 0.21 2.5 25% 1.04 0.11 3.65 0.38 0.015 0.030 0.868 0.12 0.241 4.20 0.44 172 - 199 2/7/2001 6:40 0.32 3.9 39% 1.34 0.19 4.55 0.88 0.015 0.030 1.117 0.17 0.31 5.34 1.04 396 - 465 2/7/2001 6:50 0.22 2.6 26% 1.08 3.75 0.43 0.015 0.030 0.897 0.13 0.25 4.35 0.50 193 - 223 2/7/2001 7:00 0.25 3.0 30% 1.16 _0.11 0.14 4.02 0.56 0.015 0.030 0.968 0.14 0.27 4.69 0.65 249 - 291 2/7/2001 7:10 0.31 3.7 37% 1 1.30 0.18 4.44 0.81 0.015 0.030 1.085 0.17 0.30 5.21 0.95 362 - 425 2/7/2001 7:20 0.37 4.4 44% 1.46 0.23 4.88 1.14 0.015 0.030 1.215 0.19 0.33 5.72 1.34 512 - 600 2/7/2001 7:30 0.33 3.9 39% 1.35 0.20 4.59 0.91 0.015 0.030 1.128 0.18 0.31 1 5.39 1.07 469 - 480 2/7/2001 7:40 0.20 2.4 24% 1.03 0.10 3.60 0.36 0.015 0.030 0.855 0.12 0.24 4.14 0.42 164 - 188 2/7/2001 7:50 0.18 2.2 22% 0.98 0.09 3.44 0.31 0.015 0.030 0.816 0.11 0.23 3.94 0.35 139 - 158 2/7/2001 8:00 0.27 3.2 32% 1.21 0.15 4.16 0.63 0.015 0.030 1.007 0.15 0.28 4.87 0.74 284 - 332 2/7/2001 8:10 0.35 4.3 43% 1.42 0.22 4.78 1.06 0.015 0.030 1.185 0.19 0.33 5.61 1.24 475 - 557 2/7/2001 8:20 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.30 0.26 0.015 0.030 0.779 0.10 0.22 3.74 0.30 117 - 133 2/7/2001 8:30 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 1 0.08 3.30 0.26 0.015 0.030 0.779 0.10 0.221 3.74 0.30 117 - 133 2/7/2001 8:40 0.29 3.4 34% 1.25 0.17 4.29 0.71 0.015 0.030 1.042 0.16 0.29 5.03 0.83 318 - 373 2/7/2001 8:50 0.30 3.6 36% 1.29 0.18 4.41 0.79 0.015 0.030 1.077 0.17 0.30 5.18 0.92 353 - 415 2/7/2001 9:00 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.96 0.09 3.39 0.29 0.015 0.030 0.803 0.11 0.23 3.87 0.33 131 - 149 2/7/2001 9:10 0.21 2.6 26% 1.06 0.11 3.72 0.41 0.015 0.030 0.887 0.13 0.25 4.30 0.48 186 - 215 2/7/2001 9:20 0.14 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.05 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.715 0.09 0.20 3.40 0.21 86 - 96 2/7/2001 9:30 0.16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.071 3.19 0.23 10.01510.030 0.751 0.10 0.21 3.59 0.26 103 - 116 2/7/2001 9:40 0.17 2.0 20% 0.94 0.08 3.31 0.27 10.015 0.030 0.782 0.10 0.22 3.76 0.30 119 - 135 2/7/2001 9:50 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.96 0.09 3.39 0.29 10.015 0.030 0.803 0.11 0.23 3.87 0.33 131 - 149 _2/7/2001 10:00 0.32 3.9 39% 1.35 0.20 4.57 0.90 0.015 0.030 1.123 0.17 0.31 5.37 1.05 403 - 473 2/7/2001 10:10 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.94 0.08 3.33 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.786 0.10 0.22 3.78 0.31 121 - 137 2/7/2001 10:20 0.24 2.8 28% 1.12 0.13 3.89 0.49 0.015 0.030 0.934 0.14 0.26 4.53 0.57 221 - 257 2/7/2001 10:30 0.18 2.2 22% 0.97 0.09 3.41 0.30 0.015 0.030 0.806 0.11 0.23 3.88 0.34 133 - 151 2/7/2001 10:40 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.27 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.772 0.10 0.22 3.70 0.29 114 - 129 2/7/2001 10:50 0.16 2.0 20% 0.92 0.08 3.24 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.765 0.10 0.21 3.67 0.28 110 - 124 2/7/2001 11:00 0.15 1.8 18% 0.87 0.07 3.09 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.726 0.09 0.20 3.46 0.23 91 - 102 2/7/2001 11:10 0.22 2.6 26% 1.08 0.11 3.75 0.43 0.015 0.030 0.897 0.13 0.25 4.35 0.50 193 - 223 2/7/2001 11:20 0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.03 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.711 0.09 0.20 3.38 0.21 85 - 9_4 2/7/2001 11:30 0.13 1.6 16% 0.83 0.06 2.94 0.015 0.030 0.689 0.08 0.19 3.26 0.19 75 - 83 2/7/2001 11:40 0.22 2.6 26% 1.07 0.11 3.73 _0.17 0.42 0.015 0.030 0.891 0.13 0.25 4.31 0.48 188 - 217 2/7/2001 11:50 0.16 1.9 19% 0.89 0.07 3.16 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.744 0.09 0.21 3.55 0.25 99 - 112 _2/7/2001 12:00 0.14 1.6 16% .84 0.06 2.97 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.696 0.08 0.19 3.30 0.19 78 - 87 10 0.30 3.6 36%.30 0.18 4.42 0.79 0.015 0.030 1.080 0.17 0.30 5.19 0.93 356 - 418 20 0.15 1.8 18% .88 V-1.00 0.07 3.10 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.729 0.09 0.20 3.48 0.23 1 93 - 104 30 0.19 2.3 23% 0.10 3.52 0.34 0.015 0.030 0.836 0.11 0.24 4.04 0.39 151 - 173 U:\PROJECTS\.KREBS-SEWER\SBSEWER.XLS 2101 PAGE 21 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above piRe invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft R, ft R 213 Velocity fUs Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/7/2001 12:40 0.18 2.2 22% 0.97 0.09 3.41 0.30 0.015 0.030 0.806 0.11 0.23 3.88 0.34 133 - 151 2/7/2001 12:50 0.12 1.4 14% 0.78 0.05 2.77 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.646 0.07 0.18 3.03 0.14 60 - 65 217/2001 13:00 0.13 1.5 15% 0.81 0.05 2.88 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.674 0.08 0.19 3.18 0.17 69 - 76 2/7/2001 13:10 0.13 1.6 16% 0.81 0.05 2.90 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.677 0.08 0.19 3.20 0.17 71 - 78 2/7/2001 13:20 0.13 1.6 16% 0.82 0.06 2.91 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.681 0.08 0.19 3.22 0.18 72 - 80 2/7/2001 13:30 0.20 2.4 24% 1.01 0.10 3.56 0.35 0.015 0.030 0.846 0.12 0.24 4.09 0.40 157 - 180 2R/2001 13:40 0.14 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.05 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.715 0.09 0.20 3.40 0.21 86 - 96 2/7/2001 13:50 0.17 2.0 20% 0.94 0.08 3.31 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.782 0.10 0.22 3.76 0.30 119 - 135 2/7/2001 14:00 0.29 3.5 35% 1.27 0.17 4.34 0.74 0.015 0.030 1.057 0.16 0.30 5.09 0.87 332 - 390 2/7/2001 14:10 0.13 1.6 16% 0.83 0.06 2.94 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.689 0.08 0.19 3.26 0.19 75 - 83 2/7/2001 14:20 0.28 3.3 33% 1.23 0.16 1 4.24 0.68 0.015 0.030 1.027 0.1610.291 4.96 0.79 304 - 356 2/7/2001 14:30 6.15 1,8 18% 0.87 0.06 3.08 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.722 0.09 0.20 3.44 0.22 89 - 100 2/7/2001 14:40 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.37 0.28 0.015 0.030 0.796 0.11 0.22 3.83 0.32 127 - 144 2/7/2001 14:50 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.96 0.08 3.38 0.29 0.015 0.030 0.799 0.11 0.22 3.85 0.33 129 - 147 2/7/2001 15:00 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.35 0.28 0.015 0.030 0.792 0.10 0.22 3.81 0.32 125 - 142 2/7/2001 15:10 _0.14 1.7 17% 0.85 0.06 3.02 0.18 0.015 0.030 0.707 0.09 0.20 3.36 0.21 - 92 2/7/2001 15:20 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.12 1 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.733 0.09 0.20 3.50 0.24 _83 94 - 106 2/7/2001 15:30 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.23 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.761 0.10 0.21 3.65 0.27 108 - 122 217/2001 15:40 0.15 1.8 18% 0.87 0.07 3.09 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.726 0.09 0.20 3.46 0.23 91 - 102 2/7/2001 15:50 0.14 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.05 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.715 0.09 0.20 3.40 0.21 86 - 96 2/7/2001 16:00 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.10 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.729 0.09 0.20 3.48 0.23 93 - 104 2/7/2001 16:10 0.31 3.7 37% 1.31 0.18 4.45 0.81 0.015 0.030 1.088 0.17 0.30 5.22 0.96 365 - 429 2/7/2001 16:20 0.16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.07 3.19 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.751 0.10 0.21 3.59 0.26 1103 - 116 2/7/2001 16:30 0.32 3.8 38% 1.33 0.19 4.52 0.86 0.015 0.030 1.108 0.17 0.31 5.31 1.01 387 - 454 16:40 0.16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.07 3.18 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.747 0.10 0.21 3.57 0.25 101 - 114 _2/7/2001 2/7/2001 16:50 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.13 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.737 0.09 0.20 3.52 0.24 96 - 108 _2/7/2001 17:00 0.15 1.8 18% 0.87 0.07 3.09 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.726 0.09 0.20 3.46 0.23_ 91 - 102 2/7/2001 17:10 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.29 0.26 0.015 0.030 0.775 0.10 0.22 3.72 0.29 115 - 131 2/7/2001 17:20 0.33 3.9 39% 1.35 0.20 4.59 0.91 0.015 0.030 1.128 0.18 0.31 5.39 1.07 409 - 480 2/7/2001 17:30 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.37 0.28 0.015 0.030 0.796 0.11 0.22 3.83 0.32 127 - 144 2/7/2001 17:40 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.34 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.789 0.10 0.22 3.79 0.31 123 - 140 2/7/2001 17:50 0.16 2.0 20% 0.92 0.08 3.26 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.768 0.10 0.21 3.69 0.28 112 - 126 2/7/2001 18:00 0.18 2.2 22% 0.97 0.09 3.42 0.30 0.015 0.030 0.809 0.11 0.23 3.90 0.34 135 - 154 2/7/2001 18:10 0.19 2.3 23% 1.01 0.10 3.53 0.34 0.015 0.030 0.839 0.11 0.24 4.05 0.39 153 - 175 2/7/2001 18:20 0.18 2.1 21 % 0.95 0.08 3.37 0.28 0.015 0.030 0.796 0.11 0.22 3.83 0.32 127 - 144 2/7/2001 18:30 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.12 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.733 0.09 0.20 3.50 0.24 94 - 106 18:40 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.30 0.26 0.015 0.030 0.779 0.10 0.22 3.74 0.30 117 - 133 _217/2001 2/7/2001 18:50 0.31 3.8 38% 1.32 0.19 4.49 0.84 0.015 0.030 1.100 0.17 0.31 5.27 0.99 378 - 443 2/7/2001 19:00 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.94 0.08 3.33 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.786 0.10 0.221 3.78 0.31 121 - 137 2/7/2001 19:10 0.32 3.9 39% 1.34 0.20 4.56 0.89 0.015 0.030 1.120 0.17 0.31 5.35 1.05 399 - 469 001 19.20 0.19 2.2 22% 0.99 0.09 3.47 0.32 0.015 0.030 0.823 0.11 0.23 3.97 0.36 143 - 163 001 19:30 0.33 4.0 40% 1.37 0.20 4.63 0.94 0.030 1.140 0.18 0.32 5.43 1.10 422 - 495 r27/200119:40 001 19:50 0.21 2.5 25% 1.04 0.10 3.63 0.38 _0.015 0.015 0.030 0.865 0.12 0.24 4.19 0.44 170 - 196 0.31 3.7 37% 1.31 0.18 4.45 0.81 0.015 0.030 1.088 0.17 0.30 5.22 0.96 365 - 429 U:\PROJECTS\KREBS-SEWER\SBSEWER.XLS 2/9/01 PAGE 22 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above pipe invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow I cfs n I S jP,ftjR,ftjR2/3 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/7/2001 20:00 0.15 1.8 18% 0.88 0.07 3.13 0.21 0.015 0.030 0.737 0.09 0.20 3.52 0.24 - 108 2/7/2001 20:10 0.34 4.0 40% 1.37 0.21 4.65 0.95 0.015 0.030 1.145 0.18 0.32 5.46 1.12 _96 428 - 503 2/7/2001 20:20 0.21 2.5 25% 1.05 0.11 3.68 0.40 0.015 0.030 0.878 0.12 0.25 4.25 0.46 179 - 207 2/7/2001 20:30 0.30 3.6 36% 1.28 0.18 4.38 0.77 0.015 0.030 1.068 0.16 0.30 5.14 0.90 344 - 404 2/7/2001 20:40 0.19 2.2 22% 0.99 0.09 3.47 0.32 0.015 0.030 0.823 0.11 0.23 3.97 0.36 143 - 163 2/7/2001 20:50 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.94 0.08 3.33 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.786 0.10 0.22 3.78 0.31 121 - 137 2/7/2001 21:00 0.16 1.9 19% 0.90 0.07 3.19 0.23 0.015 0.030 0.751 0.10 0.21 1 3.59 0.26 103 - 116 2/7/2001 21:10 0.17 2.1 21 % 0.95 1 0.08 3.35 0.28 0.015 0.030 0.792 0.10 0.22 3.81 0.32 125 - 142 2/7/2001 21:20 0.16 1.9 19% 0.89 0.07 3.16 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.744 0.09 0.21 3.55 0.25 - 112 2/7/2001 21:30 0.22 2.6 26% 1.07 0.11 3.73 0.42 0.015 0.030 0.891 0.13 0.25 4.31 0.48 _99 188 - 217 2/7/2001 21:40 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.22 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.758 0.10 0.21 3.63 0.27 106 - 120 2/7/2001 21:50 0.30 3.6 36% 1.30 0.18 4.42 0.79 0.015 0.030 1.080 0.17 0.30 5.19 0.93 356 - 418 2/7/2001 22:00 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.30 0.26 0.015 0.030 0.779 0.10 0.22 3.74 0.30 117 - 133 2/7/2001 22:10 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.27 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.772 0.10 0.22 3.70 0.29 114 - 129 2/712001 22:20 0.17 2.0 20% 0.94 0.08 3.31 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.782 0.10 0.22 3.76 0.30 119 - 135 2/7/2001 22:30 0.15 1.8 18% 0.89 0.07 1 3.15 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.740 0.09 0.21 3.54 0.24 - 110 2/7/2001 22:40 0.15 1.8 18% 0.89 0.07 3.15 0.22 0.015 0.030 0.740 0.09 0.21 3.54 0.24 _98 98 - 110 2/7/2001 22:50 0.14 1.7 170/6 0.86 0.06 3.05 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.715 0.09 0.20 3.40 0.21 - 96 2/7/2001 23:00 0.13 1.6 16% 0.82 0.06 2.93 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.685 0.08 0.19 3.24 0.18 _86 74 - 82 2/7/2001 23:10 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.80 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.654 0.08 0.18 3.07 0.15 62 - 68 2/7/2001 23:20 0.12 1.4 14% 0.77 0.05 2.74 0.13 0.015 0.030 0.638 0.07 0.17 2.98 0.14 57 - 62 2/7/2001 23:30 0.13 1.6 16% 0.82 0.06 2.93 0.16 0.015 0.030 0.685 0.08 0.19 3.24 0.18 74 - 82 2/7/2001 23:40 0.13 1.5 15% 0.81 0.05 2.88 0.15 0.015 0.030 0.674 0.08 0.19 3.18 0.17 69 - 76 2/7/2001 23:50 0.14 1.6 16% 0.83 0.06 2.96 0.17 0.015 0.030 0.693 0.08 0.19 3.28 0.19 77 - 85 2/8/2001 0:00 0.15 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.06 0.20 0.015 0.030 0.718 0.09 0.20 3.42 0.22 88 - 98 2/8/2001 0:10 0.14 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.05 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.715 0.09 0.20 3.40 0.21 86 - 96 2/8/2001 0:20 0.11 1.3 13% 0.75 0.04 2.67 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.622 0.07 0.17 2.89 0.12 - 56 2/8/2001 0:30 0.10 1.2 12% 0.71 0.04 2.53 0.09 0.015 0.030 0.589 0.06 0.16 2.71 0.10 _52 42 - 45 0:40 _ 0.11 1.3 13% 0.75 0.04 2.67 0.12 0.015 0.030 0.622 0.07 0.17 2.89 0.12 52 - 56 _2/8/2001 2/8/2001 0:50 0.10 1.2 12% 0.72 0.04 2.57 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.597 0.06 0.16 2.76 0.11 44 - 48 2/8/2001 1:00 0.10 1.2 12% 0.70 0.04 2.50 0.09 0.015 0.030 0.580 0.06 0.16 2.66 0.09 40 - 42 2/8/2001 1:10 0.10 1.2 12% 0.72 0.04 2.59 0.10 0.015 0.030 0.602 0.07 0.16 2.78 0.11 46 - 49 2/8/2001 1:20 0.27 3.2 32% 1.21 0.15 4.17 0.64 0.015 0.030 1.010 0.15 0.28 4.88 0.75 287 - 336 2/8/2001 1:30 0.08 1.0 10% 0.64 0.03 2.31 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.536 0.05 0.14 2.42 0.07 29 - 31 2/8/2001 1:40 0.09 1.0 10% 0.65 0.03 2.35 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.545 0.05 0.14 2.47 0.07 31 - 33 2/8/2001 1:50 0.08 0.9 90/0 0.63 0.03 2.26 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.522 0.05 0.14 2.34 0.06 27 - 28 2/8/2001 2:00 0.07 0.8 8% 0.58 0.02 2.09 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.482 0.04 0.12 2.12 0.04 20 - 20 2/8/2001 2:10 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.68 0.03 2.45 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.567 0.06 0.15 2.59 0.09 36 - 39 2/8/2001 2:20 0.08 1.0 10% 0.64 0.03 2.29 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.531 0.05 0.14 2.39 0.07 28 - 30 2/8/2001 2:30 0.08 1.0 10% 0.64 0.03 2.31 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.536 0.05 0.14 2.42 0.07 29 - 31 2I8/2001 2:40 0.08 0.9 9% 0.63 0.03 2.26 0.06 0.015 0.030 0.522 0.05 0.14 2.34 0.06 27 - 28 2/8/2001 2:50 0.07 1 0.9 9% 0.60 0.02 2.17 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.502 0.05 0.13 2.23 0.05 23 - 24 2/8/2001 3:00 0.07 _ 0.9 9% 0.60 0.02 2.17 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.502 0.05 0.13 1 2.23 0.05 23 - 24 2/8/2001 3:10 0.07 0.8 8% 0.59 0.02 2.13 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.492 0.05 0.13 2.18 0.05 21 - 22 U:kPROJECTSXKREBS SEWER%SBSEWER.XLS 2001 PAGE 23 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above i e invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cis n S P, ft R, ft R 213 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/8/2001 3:20 0.07 0.8 8% 0.58 0.02 2.11 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.487 0.04 0.13 2.15 0.05 21 - 21 2/8/2001 3:30 0.07 0.9 9% 0.60 0.02 2.15 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.497 0.05 0.13 2.21 0.05 22 - 23 2/8/2001 3:40 0.07 0.9 9% 0.61 0.02 2.20 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.507 0.05 0.13 2.26 0.05 24 - 25 2/8/2001 3:50 0.07 0.8 8% 0.58 0.02 2.11 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.487 0.04 0.13 2.15 0.05 21 - 21 2/8/2001 4:00 0.20 2.4 24% 1.03 0.10 3.60 0.36 0.015 0.030 0.855 0.12 0.24 4.14 0.42 164 - 188 2/8/2001 4:10 0.07 0.8 8% 0.58 1 0.02 2.09 0.04 0.015 0.030 0.482 0.04 0.12 2.12 0.04 20 - 20 2/8/2001 4:20 0.07 0.9 9% 0.60 0.02 2.17 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.502 0.05 0.13 2.23 0.05 23 - 24 2/8/2001 4:30 0.07 0.9 9% 0.60 0.02 2.17 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.502 0.05 0.13 2.23 0.05 23 - 24 2/8/2001 4:40 0.07 0.9 9% 0.60 0.02 2.17 0.05 0.015 0.030 0.502 0.05 0.13 2.23 0.05 23 - 24 2/8/2001 4:50 0.26 3.1 31 % 1.18 0.14 4.06 0.58 0.015 0.030 0.980 0.15 0.28 4.74 0.68 260 - 303 2/8/2001 5:00 0.09 1.0 10% 0.65 0.031 2.35 0.07 0.015 0.030 0.545 0.05 0.14 2.47 0.07 31 - 33 2/8/2001 5:10 0.09 1_ 1 11 % 0.68 0.03 2.43 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.563 0.06 0.15 2.57 0.08 35 - 37 2/8/2001 5:20 0.09 1.1 11 % 0.67 0.03 2.41 0.08 0.015 0.030 0.558 0.06 0.15 2.54 0.08 34 - 36 2/8/2001 5:30 0.10 1.2 12% 0.70 0.04 2.52 0.09 0.015 0.030 0.585 0.06 0.16 2.69 0.10 41 - _44 2/8/2001 5:40 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.83 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.662 0.08 0.18 3.11 0.16 65 - 71 2/8/2001 5:50 0.14 1.7 17% 0.86 0.06 3.05 0.19 0.015 0.030 0.715 0.09 0.20 3.40 0.21 86 - 96 2/8/2001 6:00 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.22 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.758 0.10 0.21 3.63 0.27 106 - 120 2/8/2001 6:10 0.21 2.5 25% 1.05 0.11 3.68 0.40 0.015 0.030 0.878 0.12 0.25 4.25 0.46 179 - 207 2/8/2001 6:20 0.16 1.9 19% 0.91 0.07 3.23 0.24 0.015 0.030 0.761 0.10 0.21 3.65 0.27 108 - 122 2/8/2001 6:30 _ 0.16 2.0 20% 0.92 0.08 3.24 0.25 0.015 0.030 0.765 0.10 0.21 3.67 0.28 110 - 124 2/8/2001 6:40 0.39 4.6 46% 1.50 0.25 4.98 1.23 0.015 0.030 1.246 0.20 0.34 5.83 1.44 551 - 645 2/8/2001 6:50 0.25 3.0 30% 1.15 0.14 3.99 0.54 0.015 0.030 0.959 0.14 0.27 4.65 0.63 242 - 282 2/8/2001 7:00 0.26 3.2 32% 1.20 0.15 4.13 0.61 0.015 0.030 0.998 0.15 0.28 4.83 0.72 276 - 323 2/8/2001 7:10 0.35 4.2 42% 1.41 0.22 4.74 1.03 0.015 0.030 1.173 0.18 0.32 5.56 461 - 541 2/8/2001 7:20 0.39 4.6 46% 1.50 0.25 4.99 1.24 0.015 0.030 1.249 0.20 0.34 5.84 _1.21 1.45 555 - 649 2/8/2001 7:30 0.25 3.0 30% 1.16 0.14 4.02 0.56 0.015 0.030 0.968 0.14 0.27 4.69 249 - 291 2/8/2001 7:40 0.23 2.8 28% 1.12 0.13 3.88 0.49 0.015 0.030 0.931 0.13 0.26 4.51 _0.65 0.57 219 - 255 2 / 8 / 2 F0 f 7 50 0.22 2.6 26% 1.08 0.12 3.77 0.43 0.015 0.030 0.900 0.13 0.25 4.36 0.50 195 - 226 8:00 0.23 2.8 28% 1.11 0.12 3.85 0.47 0.015 0.030 0.922 0.13 0.26 4.47 0.55 212 - 246 _2/8/2001 2/8/2001 8:10 0.32 3.8 38% 1.33 0.19 4.53 0.87 0.015 0.030 1.111 0.17 0.31 5.32 390 - 458 2/8/2001 8:20 0.18 2.2 22% 0.98 0.09 3.44 0.31 0.015 0.030 0.816 0.11 0.23 3.94 _1.02 0.35 139 - 158 2/8/2 001 8:30 0.19 2.3 23% 1.00 0.09 3.51 1 0.33 0.015 0.030 0.833 0.11 0.23 4.02 0.38 149 - 170 2/8/2001 8:40 0.32 3.8 38% 1.33 0.19 4.52 0.86 0.015 0.030 1.108 0.17 0.31 5.31 1.01 387 454 2/8/2001 8:50 0.19 2.3 23% 0.99 0.09 3.48 0.32 0.015 0.030 0.826 0.11 0.23 3.99 0.37 145 - 166 2/8/2001 9:00 0.18 2.2 22% 0.97 0.09 3.42 0.30 0.015 0.030 0.809 0.11 0.23 3.90 135 - 154 2/8/2001 9:10 0.26 3.1 31 % 1.18 0.14 4.06 0.58 0.015 0.030 0.980 0.15 0.28 4.74 _0.34 0.68 260 - 303 2/8/2001 9:20 0.20 2.3 23% 1.01 0.10 3.55 0.35 0.015 0.030 0.842 0.12 0.24 4.07 0.40 155 - 178 2/8/2001 9:30 0.20 2.4 24% 1.03 0.10 3.62 0.37 0.015 0.030 0.862 0.12 0.24 4.17 168 - 193 2/8/2001 9:40 0.31 3.8 38% 1.32 0.19 4.50 0.85 0.015 0.030 1.103 0.17 0.31' 5.28 _0.43 381 - 44_7 2/8/2001 9:50 0.19 2.3 23% 1.00 0.10 3.52 0.34 0.015 0.030 0.836 0.11 0.24 4.04 _1.00 0.39 151 - 173 2/8/2001 10:00 0.19 2.3 23% 1.01 0.10 3.53 0.34 0.015 0.030 0.839 0.11 0.24 4.05 0.39 153 - 175 2/8/2001 10:10 0.30 3.6 36% 1.29 0.18 4.39 0.77 0.015 0.030 1.071 0.16 0.30 5.15 347 - 4_0_7 2l8/2001 10:20 0.19 2.2 22% 0.99 0.09 3.47 0.32 0.015 0.030 0.823 0.11 0.23 3.97 _0.91 0.36 143 - 163 2/8/2001 10:30 0.17 2.0 20% 0.93 0.08 3.30 0.26 0.015 0.030 0.779 0.10 0.22 3.74 0.30 117 - 133 U:IPROJECTS\KREBS SEWERISBSEWER.XLS 219/01 PAGE 24 OF 24 FIELD DATA FROM CULVERT EQUATION FROM MANNINGS EQUATION Range of Date and Time Depth of liquid, above pipe invert: % Full Alpha radians Area ft2 Velocity ft/s Flow cfs n S P, ft R, ft R 2/3 Velocity fUs Flow cfs Estimated Flow, feet inches 2/8/2001 10:40 0.20 2.4 24% 1.03 0.10 3.62 0.37 0.015 0.030 0.862 0.12 0.24 4.17 0.43 168 - 193 2/8/2001 10:50 0.18 2.2 22% 0.97 0.09 3.41 0.30 0.015 0.030 0.806 0.11 0.23 3.88 0.34 133 - 151 2/8/2001 11:00 0.31 3.7 37% 1.31 0.19 4.47 0.83 0.015 0.030 1.094 0.17 0.31 5.25 0.97 371 - 436 2/8/2001 11:10 0.17 2.0 20% 0.94 0.08 3.31 0.27 0.015 0.030 0.782 0.10 0.22 3.76 0.30 119 - 135 2/8/2001 11:20 0.12 1.5 15% 0.79 0.05 2.82 0.14 0.015 0.030 0.658 0.08 0.18 3.09 0.16 64 - 70 MAXIMUM MINIMUM MEAN MEDIAN 90 PERCENTILE 0.49 0.05 0.16 0.15 0.30 5.8 0.6 2.0 1.8 3.6 58% 6% 20% 18% 36% 5.6 1.7 3.2 3.1 4.4 1.8 0.02 0.3 0.2 0.8 6.4 1.7 3.5 3.4 5.2 2.1 0.02 0.3 0.2 0.9 830 - 950 9 - 10 132 - 151 89 - 100 348 - 408 U:\PROJECTS\KREBS-SEWER\SBSEWER.XLS 2/M/01 mm PAGE _ OF PROJECII ILL. DATE: MP Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. Consulting ft Geologists 434 Shelburne Rd. ing .ts Burlinglon, VT 0i;i—pl--,,) P64 H WVN Wagner, Heindei, and Noyes, Inc. Consulting Geologists 434 Shelburne Rd. Burlington, VT 05401 0 PAGE OF PROJECT: DATE: _c4n 4 Co+ 41P ( f t .... �..�. �f��:f,,.. 1.L L¢`v� £o�'I!?�taie.:,• _ _z . ��1f� 'x� � + 'i.. . '� : _� i2' ..�+�'.. :..:.;.k„i �,� }}�� . , : ��' �i' f lii, � .{�-F�p J...;.;�.��. <{.J�t ^tc•C!� i �4'�..�E /� J�y�. �� S ..�! � _ .f ..�/. . m . ..-C I. WL ,..�i.11k � .W.w.,g..._ iY� .... A};G...,i .�.1F..� L.+�l�-• � , .iviil.� M4,.�S ..,A r.ksCE rr .i'�d as_ �` . {i� !c{ tat3i�i fix!• i`'r ...-1. Y. ;�} d..: {`, �s S►?�T%^ -tic � v : a f t S } i Ay �. x lilili? 5 w. .�,x.= f,Q33i�n4 "Ro��+�.:� Cct�,c rn� ;17. ��a�'..�fa� .3l�u�r..+,�� r�=►,��k�i�, .�►lt�..e�.c�.. J _�._... 3 i 1 d x fi7 uf FAf.S JJJ y .� •µ� pp ygg ## sfi .p fsF1l, / - SAX ; �p�f i.. .e.-.. .•k3.�..y..�._....M .L4S. ���i�C k�- F/.S•�!.f .� Gr9.s :tk:Azii�aa t L� Hydrant Flow Testing Attachment 3 SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 MEMORANDUM To: Mike Burke, Krebs and Lansing Engineers / ,From: Jay Nadeau, South Burlington Water Department Superintendent ,( Date: January 24, 2001 Subject. Water line information; property between Kennedy Dr, Hinesburg Rd. and Old Farm Rd. South Burlington I have attached copies of our main line gate valve and fire hydrant maps as well as a copy of a section of the plans for Cardinal Woods off from Hinesburg Ave. This information should give you an idea of the water main types and sizes in the area we discussed by phone this afternoon. Please note the water line location at the corner of Hayes Ave and Hinesburg Rd. I do not have any flow test information for any of the hydrants in the area along Kennedy Drive or Hinesburg Rd. If you should require this information please call me to set up a time_ We would like to avoid flowing any hydrants this winter, but we cm if it is absolutely necessary. The City of South Burlington charges for the time associated with its water department employees to perform and record a hydrant flow test. This fee is billed to the requesting company after the test is completed. As always, if you have any questions or I can be of any further service, please give me call. Post -it® Fax Note 7671 Date p oe► To �� (J/%/L/i'� From CO./Debt Co- Phone a Phone x Fax N� G_ 8 Fax e 00 114 c+ Pc O \ m \ cc� 1I 0 0 _i �• f .� fLiY 7 AL Jw t �� �► ��, a� Pa� � o�� (Uf?G � , OF00� NNESBI `i aRci1�1 BSI C��Vq I »ySE i t GAR Kl 8`322 1314 313 1 \ 325 324 32 [ 3i7 3 J2 /�•—•�2 3t5 3fl 321 � _ 291 316 316 Q �. 335 334 Q o T dOy P 30 3p 1 0 306` rax fR BT, • 309 QCOUNTRY �+\ FORE8 292 CR0�7` 320' 319 05l PAR K 304tp\ 303 293`�j a 301 300 4C 297 328 299 390 w>rLLEsLEYGROVE 392 32 U GEORGETOWN 391 393/ VDU rE WINDING / 43 BROOK / o 3 / A •� 0 fi 5Qu WINDRIOOE L ,xpOD� 401 i 396 400 / O 399 441 398 402 vh t'^ 0 403 f 494 0 404 riq So�T y �, b 4J7 ��� •Y �7w, �>, 415 TREETOP 493 CIRCLE R. 259 8 D.i- 2i�o iNT'�RS r.•- I 1 1 S3O1--372 v} IDS C)o I CPRO,�PL �336 3t9 3f. 345 \ 320 r (�_ 7 ty 372 DERBY CIRCLE �trslNp 34a 33y.�� 338 ° 337 3 21 : �' 31. CWD 14C 32 _ -w.� 354� - V 347 i 343 3 . ��-M 322.E 31t? tk1� 50 . 3'p 342 333 \ 33C 323 8[wOWOFF NO.4 356 34gr 341 332 'S31 324 \ C W D ! b �10 _358 35_' 35 348 �� 339 \ 482 325 �,�••- 371 351 c" 3,6 (p^ 326 H";\ �f 357 3b9 4r 1 •`� 1,61 \ 362 �Y 10' 366) % 00 � FOREST 327 R 9360 4,. J 340\ PARK 326 6 365'� / 63 9 �(+ / COUNTRY PARK o Rai rr L � 4f� ,:.�, �3 368 367 HS 474-482479 116, 474 477 G a`' ! 475 I 484 485 C 486 W EL LE3 LEY GROVE U GEORGETOWN WINDING Sot BROOK H 5 487-502 500 / �0 488 G D499 49e / , , 8 518 19 WINDRIDGE ,/ 2 ' 489 �: 11517 . - 497 / cr S504 20 512 516• a96 r' 491 8UR .KTREE 493 - Q 492 494 495 a 5t3 L'• )Y 667 to O .r 666 �; a SaUT 5871 "f "- 588 566 r TREETOP CIRC E . DR. ScIll PI cc M Cl)a (n Y LJ II a i a M m jps kPa Psi 827 120 793 115 758 110 724 105 690 100 655 95 621 90 586 85 552 80 517 75 483 70 448 65 414 60 379 55 345 50 310 45 275 40 241 35 206 30 172 25 137 20 103.4 15 69.0 10 34.5 5 0 GPM Imp. Gal. Liters r Fire Protection Publications Universal Water Flow Test Summary Sheet Oklahoma State University Conducted by '� r Location �- Date Stillwater, OK 74078 Hydrant coefficient Elevation Static ; Residual .+;>.._a '@ Flow ` YYYYYVWYYWYWIYYWYWYIIWWIWWWYYWWWYYYYWWWWYYWYYWYWW� Scale Used _C_ nnnneen�nnn�nn�ninn�n�n�nn�nn�nnnnrmnnnnnnnnnn ininnnennn� 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Scale A 83 167 250 333 416 500 583 666 749 833 380 759, 1139 1519 1899 2278 2658 3038 3418 3797 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Scale B 167 333 500 666 833 999 1166 1332 1499 1665 759 1519 2278 3038 3797 4557 5316 6075 6835 7594 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800 3200 3600 4000 ScalelCq) 333 666 999 1332 1665 1998 2332 2665 2998 3331 1519 3038 4557 6075 7594 9113 10,632 12,151 13,670 15,188 Copyright @ 1990 Oklahoma State University FLOW nZ)i L1 i Znei 14: 1 i dU'-'db4b4Jb CHAMPLAIN WATER DIST PAGE 02 Champlain Water District J93 Queen Cuv Park Road 5wnihOurGngton.1705143 Fire Flow Field Report City : South Burlington Street : Kennedy Drive Location Description : Flow hydrant #401 located at end of 8" DI water line located at Windridge Condos. Resid hyd #400 located on same water line at entrance to Windridge Condos. Line is tapped into Kennedy Drive 12" AC water main DatelTim.e Tested: F 4/17/2001 11:30.-00 AM I Tester : JN,DP Flow Hydrant Ini4r�► bon Hyd 1: # 401 Hyd 2: # Hyd 3# Hyd 1: Static 80 psi Hyd 2: Static psi Hyd 3 Static �� psi Hyd 1: Pitot 65 psi Hyd 2: Pitot psi Hyd 3 Pitot psi Hyd 1: OD 2.5 Hyd 2. OD Hyd 3 OD Hyd 1: C 0.9 Hyd 2: C Hyd 3 C l�J Hyd 1: Flow 1352.80 gpm Hyd 2: Flow 0 007 gpm Hyd 3 Flow 0.00 gpm Flow = 29.83*C*OD^2*sgr(pitot) Total Flow : 1352.80 gpm Residual Hydrant Information Hyd l # 400Hyd 2 # Hyd 3 # Hyd 1 Static 73 Hyd 2 Static 0 Hyd 3 Static 0 Hyd 1 Res 68 Hyd 2 ,Res 0 Hyd 3 Res 0 System Conditions: Weather: Clear Temp: 40-45degrees V.J7 :=1/ LUVl 14. 1 f OU,�004U4.3D I:HAM'LAIN WATER U151 PAGE 03 Champlain Water District 03 Queen City Nark Pr)ad South Budington, V7 0544,3 Pho.e. r602) 864-743d Fire Flow Field Renor,� City - So. Burlington Street : Hinesburg Rd Location Description : Flow hyd # 330 located between 2 Resid hyds. on Hinesburg Rd in 12"AC main. Flow hyd. and Resid hyd 4327 about the same elevation- Flow hyd slightly lower in elevation than Resid hyd #332 Date/Time Tested: 4/17/2001 11:20.00 AM Tester : JN,DP Irhff-H.vdrant In ormatio.rn. Hyd I: # 330 Hyd 2: # Hyd 3# Hyd I: Static 81 psi Hyd 2: Static �� psi flyd 3 Static psi Hyd l: Pitot 80 psi Hyd 2: Pitot r psi Hyd 3 Pitot �0� psi Hyd 1: OD 2.5 Hyd 2: OD Hyd 3 OD Hyd X: C 0.9 Hyd 2: C� Hyd 3 C Hyd X: Flow 1299.72 gpm Hyd 2: Flow 1 .00 gpm Hyd 3 Flow 0-00 gpm Flow = 29.83*C*ODA2*sgr(pitot) Total Flow : 1299.72 gpm Residual Hvdrant Information Hyd I # 32T7 Hyd 2 # 332 Hyd 3 # ^ Hyd I Static 82 Hyd 2 Static 80 Hyd 3 Static 0 Hyd I Res 72 Hyd 2 Res 70 Hyd 3 Res 0 System Conditions : Weather: clear, Temp: 40-45 degrees, 12 AC main supplied from the Kennedy Drive line and also through Grandview/ Timber Lane/ Hayes Avenue water mains. NJHIGIC. V101 F'AUt bQ Champlain Water District 403 Queen City Park Oneid Sautlr.t)ur,irrEroir, V1, 05403 Fire Flow Field R e_o Qr 1 Ptenn4: (SR2)84�.?J,iJ City : South Burlington Street : Kennedy Drive Location Description : Flow hydrant #405 located in drive entrance to Tree Top Condos on Kennedy Dr, on 12 AC water main, Resid hyd. #391 located on Kennedy Dr near Hinesburg Rd on 12" water main Date/Time Tested: 4/17/2001 11:20,00 AM Tester: JN,DP FlowHvdrant Information - Hyd l: # 405 Hyd 2: # Hyd 3# Q .Hyd 1. Static 78 psi Hyd 2: Static psi Hyd 3 Static psi Hyd 1. Pitot 65 psi Hyd 2: Pitot psi Hyd 3 Pitot ~� psi Hyd 1: OD 2.5 Hyd 2: OD Hyd 3 OD Hyd 1: C 0•9 Hyd 2: C Hyd 3 C Hyd I: Flow 1352.00 gpm Hyd 2: Flow 0.00 gpm Hyd 3 Flow O.OU gpm Flow = 29.83*C*OD^2*sgr(pitot) Total Flow :1 1352.86--7 gpm Residual Hydrant Information Hyd I # 391 Hyd 2 # Hyd 3 # Hyd I Static �Hyd 2 Static 0 Hyd 3 Static 0 Hyd I Res 72 Hyd 2 Res 0 Hyd 3 Res 0 System Conditions : Weather: clear Temp. 40-45 degrees. Both hydrants located on a 12 AC water main. v.�i �1� �vv1 1, -+. i r VV�V V`1 V'YJJ '�f 1H1'11 LH11V 4'1H IGf<. L1J1 rH�7C V:! ��� t vGLAND 338 � \ HONE 337 \ 21 33 ` 220 4 ` - -�� t YEggYI 1� I� l+ IN Jl S XJ 3 � 322 �3;4 3l3 325 t—_ �+324 3z { 317 312 / 2 a 315 311 ERHY.CjQC, 8• ®. 321 Ike, 334 . 318 3I6 i 335 p0y� v Q 30 �„+• �pX R R .` 292 • 309 FOREL ^ COUNTRY t" 'ter pRT 0 320' 319 pR P PAR K 304 79 A 333 32 303 29_ 302 b wo \ 301 330 ''� � ���� •� p,i,. 329 3� 299 WELLE8LE`I 390 i 298 � OROVtE- � � C 392 / 327 ,� hJNFsB� GEOROCTOWN \ 393! qoU r WIAIDIN / 43 K av 0— p / 395 /4IN WtNDRtDOE � �� _.�40L �• 396 0 400 A 0 397 v 3WARTREE 416 O ,y 399 398 0,R 402 !p 403 cA 494 0 418 404 Spv ti �` 3� ?� v •:. '9p v 4 417 415 /� TREETOP r. _�. �� ��. .. ' ........ � .. .. v. •rt•i• L"M 11Y WMI[...1 `. LiJI f Hi7G VD 414 l 'fi �� -n J� • U' \ D \ \ Q t U / 4 IR_ N 41, �\ 411 05 4091 / V• �0` 412 � � O 8 "A �. / I } 407 S' V s•, 410� 1 TREETOP ' 491 406 4�V'•v to 1 `��� i � 2�✓_','��/ �• oto `v z � rnr 8. �G c J X ( O 4y 470 C• �11`,A� 471 Q� Q _ 472 �f BA.C. 473 ROUT( .x, 490 vo A7 \' PPP �. p� 474 p\. A8 A6 p�¢ 12 1 1TEIC 478 All lQ= , U . S, \ 475 1- p t 10 GUSTO AIO 1' \ �4 "QC-^. ,C) As Q;p -,Jy `,�, 477 478 6 Psi \ ol-,480 1i i Gam•. ,-� Lt 9� Ai 483 po \ i \\ 482 \ G Z, re X( * C' Z. �. A q o QA1 << Traffic Report Attachment 4 Wetland Evaluation Attachment 6 WM. D. COUNTRYMAN Environmental Assessment And Planning 868 WINCH HILL ROAD NORTHFIELD, VERMONT 05663 802-485-8421 20 November 2000 O'Brien Brothers Realty ATTN: Pat O'Brien P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407 Subject: Home Farm wetland delineations Dear Pat, I delineated the wetlands on the Home Farm parcel on 3 November, and Arthur Gilman and I completed the Corps of Engineers data forms for the project (enclosed) on 14 November. There are three wetlands in the area proposed for the project; all are in drainage swales on the Kennedy Drive side of the property. These wetlands, designated "A", `B" and "C" are in well-defined shallow ravines. These three wetlands are along drains that eventually lead to Potash Brook, passing across a large expanse of poorly to very poorly drained Enosburg & Whatley soils. There is an extensive Class Two wetland along Potash Brook, and it is conceivable that wetlands on the Home Farm site might be connected across Kennedy Drive to those Class Two wetlands. I will try to determine if we are dealing with Class Two or Class Three wetlands this afternoon while in the area on another project, and will contact you once I have visited the site. Sincerely, l Errol C. Briggs ECB/s Encls. Project Title: I.oM� rARM File Number: Tronsecl: Plot: WtTiAqu @FIRS A e Dole: 14NOV'ro" DATA -- VEGETATION Stratum and Species (DOMINANTS ONLY) Dominance Ratio Percent Dominance NWI Status TRErs: lib'Je 10 WCTIAMD 50AJJJ: N614e bJ U[fTl4u> N�Abr: z�P�TIE.►s CAfea5r5 70 SGIA„V#M DuIcA41AA11 FA c� 10 FA c ���,�R►,,M Fell x Ff-,-1n Is fAc '�R�6�itAis 19t(/1Med,4 rMeF {A GAL 0^Icic, s�,s�,6l1,s TbcF FA , U1 OBL: FACW: FAC: FACU: UPL: I Tally (Dominants ONLY): I SUM: 100 x Domino nl(OBL+FACW+FAC)/Tally Sum Describe Vegetation Disturbance: Describe Problem Vegetation: DATA -- SOIL Soil Taxonomy: Cores of Engineers Re ionol Draino a Class: Criterion: Is Put '-hed Soil Survey Available? Yes No ❑ Title/Dole: 50r; I YJl%JC 4CNJ7TCA'3'Ee) C1,1119, 01- IS%-f Soil Type Mopped: c JwWAS -4 S6, Is Depth Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell, Moist) olor of Mottles Munsell, Moist) USDA Texture, iron or manganese nodules or concretions, restrictive undonce/Contrast layers, root distribution, oxidixed rhaospheres, etc. RlluvtJM /JKIJC,� Remarks: Sketch Landscape Position: I I r Jtt V`� 1. 'No' 6.e W. sox...by 1...W.nee that th...x 1. NOr k*AAIC SOIL DETERMINATION NOTE: 1 N. ehschA I is vase In use by the N_ 17gI d Corp. el CngM..nl w e,rlyd. Ih..1. N.. rnebrd Slat.. may ae k,opprapri.le. I No sa«pr.ays rouekw may be Inopprap6l. In unusual eaw.. NI dominant plants are OBLIGATE. ®O All dominant plants are FACULTATIVE WET AND OBUCATE and the topographic boundary Is abrupt. O © Soil is frequently PONDED or FLOODED for a duration longer than two weeks during the growing season. (attach an explanation at the basis for your conclusions). o ® The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a VERY POORLY DRAINED SOIL' and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. o o The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a POORLY DRAINED SOIL' and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. oo The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a SOMEWHAT POORLY DRAINED SOIL that has either of the following two characteristics*: Yes NO 00 1. Within 6 Inches of the soil surface there are: Yes No a. soil mottles within on A or Ap horizon and the subsoil is mottled throughout; OR b. common to many, distinct or prominent mottles with a matrix of chroma 3 or less: OR O C3 c. distinct or prominent oxidized rhizospheres and the subsoil is mottled throughout. 2. Within 24 inches of the soil surface, there are mottles which an common to many, distinct or prominent, and that are chroma 2 or less, and one of the following: Yes No Q o. In the horizon that lies within 10 inches of the soil surface and directly beneath a dark" A or Ap horizon, the matrix is chroma 3 or less: the mottles are of least 10X in abundance and distinct or prominent. O b. When a dork*Ap horizon is between 10 and 14 inches thick, wetness morphology may be masked by organic matter. Normally, these problem situations will be considered hydrlc when: i. hydrophytes ore prevalent, ii. there is no evidence of altered hydrology, and W. in the horizon that lies directly beneath the Ap horizon, the matrix color is chroma 3 or less and mottles are at least 10% in abundance and distinct or prominent. Check here and attach a description of your procedures and conclusions if one of the following options were chosen for your hydrk soil determination: measured redox potentials, colormstric test for ferrous iron test (w,tr,—Dipyridil), or other meosurements and observations. e Typically in New England, soils having these morphologies will be classified in on aquic suborder or an aquic subgroup in soil taxonomy. ee Note: o dark A or Ap Is defined as having a value of 3 or less Remarks: I. l** low 1. ell.n the mast 6111w.wll Naar. to 0— DATA k 3. Inl«pnbasn. mwl W.r P.opp.p4t. a av ee..na4ne 6, NOTE: « DETERMINATION HYDROLOGY tehl a IN s«son, r«.nl ..ah.r con6uen., w rot«.had ell«.14n., etc J. w«pr.t.r n ar lyd..49y may r.q,4. r.peat.d .e...waon. e..r Rb1. abn OM .I...n, ❑ Recorded Data: Stream, lake or tidal gags Identification: Aerial Photograph Identification: Other identification: ❑ No Recorded Data Available REPORT ANY OF THE FOLLOWNC OBSERVATIONS: Depth to Free Water. >) p r' Depth to Saturation: 0 Describe Altered Hydrology: NG►JC ❑ Inundated Saturated in upper 12in. ❑ Water Works ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres ❑ Drift Lines Gal Water Stained Leaves ® Water —borne Sediment ❑ Surface Scoured Areas WWetlond Drainage Patterns Deposits ❑ No Evidence of Significant Hydrological Modification AND there is one or more Morphological Plant Adaptation SUCH AS: ❑ Pneumolophores ❑ Buttressed Trees ❑ Hypertrophied Lenlicsis ❑ Stooling ❑ Adventitious Roots ❑ Inflated Leaves, Stems, or Roots ❑ Shallow Root Systems ❑ Floating Leaves ❑ Aerenchymo in Roots k stems ❑ Polymorphic Leaves ❑ Hydric Soils and NO visible evidence of significant hydrological modification Remarks: CONCLUSIONS Project Title: Hwe FAQ Delineator: A\IC"(,pAd/ E C.*SAIG*S Transect: Plot: H. 64 P,,, 6 Dote:: GO Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Yes No Metz 12 ❑ Hydric Soils Criterion Met? co ❑ Yes No Welland Hydrology Criterion Met? ® ❑ IS THIS DATAPOINT WITHIN A WETLAND? ❑ Remarks: Project Title: HOME f - ,I#, File Number: Tronsecl: I Plot: U/ A0b 6 Date: Of "lV, ZO 0 0 DATA -- 1 VEGETATION Stratum and Species (DOMINANTS ONLY) Dominance Ratio I Percent Dominance NWI Status WET: No S1ka 6i3 75- r PR,�,rus 3i►aor,�e 2S F�c4 sIdR,JI�J: IiAA,AA�CIIs vL4frrJ1ADA CA Ity.4 WA I IS s F4 c ACU H�'/2/6i: THF��i�Jtrs NarABc,tAcF,t�s�s 61"J(PAITIs Nli1e,ivQ0L"Js �U TAKE FA C Tally (Dominants ONLY): OBL: FACW: FAC: ( FACU: ( UPL: SUM: 2 100 x Domino nl(OSL+FACW+FAC)/Tolly Sum 5D% Describe Vegetation Disturbance: Describe Problem Vegetation: DATA -- SOIL Soil Taxonomy: CorPa of Engineers Re anal Drama a Class: Criterion: Is Published Soil Survey Available? Yes (9 No Cl Title/Date: T%l j Ti3MeJ 4 Cht-i c'mc.► Soil Type Mopped: AAAlY will iam 164 F.rF sfi11D W-Tf,�M 197Y Depth Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell, Moist) Color of Mottles Munsell, Moist) USDA Texture, iron or manganese nodules or concretions, restrictive undance/Conlrosl to ore. root distribution, oxidixed rhizospheres, etc. 2-0 0 10 Y� 3 /2 t &Jf E A. l+d YA 3 i2 It SAJISJI )d, ,0 2 - A% i orb J �3 ►, f,.� r S,�j, <<�n, 8-� 8 A3 lo� 4 /4 r "Se S,rtf 10A,,,, Remarks: Sketch Landscape Position: t • t t 1. 'Iq• M In ad eo foh-L4 1..Ade. "I Ih. e.e is NOr HrDR4 SOIL DETERMINATION NOTE: 2. TIJ. 0-1,11 1 1. wed fe,, ... by the rt.. Ce9 a«s. •1 Cng4.-1 tod. N. W. rl.. England S1.ln may ee kwpprep.l.4. J. 1N. W.rp.W. rout:ry may b• Inapfs.prbt. In wrwud se... AN dominant plants are OBLIGATE. CD ® AN dominant plants are FACULTATNE WET AND OBLIGATE and the topographic boundary Is abrupt. ED ® Soil Is frequently PONDED or FLOODED for a duration longer than two weeks during the growing season. (attach an explanation of the bosis for your conclusions). Ej® The soil masts the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a VERY POORLY DRAINED SOIL' and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. ❑ ® The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a POORLY DRAINED SOIL and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. ® The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a SOMEWHAT POORLY DRANED SOIL that has either of the following two characteristics: 1. Within 6 inches of the soil surface thus ore: Yes No ®o. soil mottles within on A or Ap horizon and the subsoil is mottled throughout; OR ® b. common to many, distinct or prominent mottles with a matrix of chroma 3 or less; OR O ® c. distinct or prominent oxidized rhizospheres and the subsoil is mottled throughout. a 2. Within 24 inches of the soil surface, there are mottles which ors common to many, distinct or prominent, and that are chroma 2 or less, and one of the following: Yes No ® a. In the horizon that lies within 10 inches of the soil surface and directly beneath a dark" A or Ap horizon, the matrix is chroma 3 or less, the mottles are at least 1OX in abundance and distinct or prominent. ® b. When a dork'Ap horizon is between 10 and 14 inches thick, wetness morphology may be masked by organic matter, Normally, these problem situations will be considered hydrk when: L hydrophytes are prevalent, N. there is no evidence of altered hydrology, and Ni. in the horizon that lies directly beneath the Ap horizon, the matrix color is chroma 3 or less and mottles are at least 10% in abundance and distinct or prominent. Check here and attach a description of your procedures and conclusions if one of the following options were chosen for your hydric soil determination: measured redox potentials, colormetric lest for ferrous iron test (d,tr,—Dipyridil), or other measurements and observations. *Typically in New England, soils having these morphologies will be classified In an oquic suborder or an aquic subgroup in soil taxonomy. .. Note: a dark A or Ap is defined as having a value of 3 or less and a chroma of 2 or less Remarks: 1. lydrobgy Is aft- the noel 6lrievll betve 1.0.rr6. DATA k 1. W.rpr.l.a.ne mr•t "..Wor av .W.Viol—so .1 W. eb. &1;-.:. NOTE: DETERMINATION Ighl of the .rtln, --I ..•Ih.r .e Us-, end ..t.r.h.d •Iwe14n., .1, HYDROLOGY J. W.rp.4don of hydr.bgy r.y r.q A,. r.pwt d okwrvel;en. w.r mwe Ih•n Me Metln. ❑ Recorded Data: Stream, lake or tidal gage Identification: Aerial Photograph Identification: Other Identification: ❑ No Recorded Data Available REPORT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING OBSERVATIONS: Depth to Free Water. 7 I 1 ". Depth to Saturation: ; )J d• Describe Altered Hydrology: f4QW ❑ Inundated ❑ Saturated in upper 12in. ❑ Water Works ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Water Stained Leaves ❑ Water —borne Sediment ❑ Surface Scoured Areas ❑Wetland Drainage Patterns Deposits ❑ No Evidence of Significant Hydrological Modification AND there is one or more Morphological Plant Adaptation SUCH AS: ❑ Pneumalophores ❑ Buttressed Trees ❑ Hypertrophied Lenticels ❑ Stooling ❑ Adventitious Roots ❑ Inflated Leaves, Stems, or Roots ❑ Shallow Root Systems ❑ Floating Leaves ❑ Aerenchymo in Roots & stems ❑ Polymorphic Leaves ❑ Hydric Soils and NO visible evidence of significant hydrological modification Remarks: CONCLUSIONS Project Title: POW FAA '1 r I�ny1 Delineator. f Wri-ti 1Visi �EWR�jJ Transact: r Plot: �M � �C Date:: 1h � j,000 Yes No Hydrophylic Vegetation Criterion f Metz ILL Hydric Soils Criterion Met? f❑11 ❑ 10 Yes No Welland Hydrology Criterion Met? ❑ [j3 IS THIS DATAPOINT WITHIN A WETLAND7 ❑ Remarks: Project Title: uaM File Number: l E�ARM Tronsect: 2 Plot: Wrr14,,b @RA j 9-22 Date: mhwcmll 2aot DATA -- Stratum and Species Dominance Rollo Percent Dominonce NWI Status VEGETATION (DOMINANTS ONLY) rMS: k1AF lw IASCILAA)0 Sl hl� T- AcFk RodAjM '1 Haas: '�F'JC rA A SMArA is o�c Did-�sru�r..r c�.r l..�nrs. yiX /GtJE Lir�c.t v�r�ii/� OBL: � FACW: FAC: FACU: UPL: Tally (Dominants ONLY): SUM: !00 x DOminant(OSL+FACW+FAC)/Tally Sum Describe Vegetation Disturbance: Describe Problem Vegetation: DATA -- SOIL Soil Taxonomy: Cores of En9inaers Re tonal Drama a Class: Criterion: Is Published Soil Survey Available? Yes ® No ❑ Title/Dole: JQ;l-TUAdty C� (hitT(Nac,) Soil Type Mapped: &gd3 wwk�! 5ai IJ C60'.1-4•Ut (9h Depth Horizon Matrix Color (Munsall, Moist) Color of Mottles Munsell, Moist) USDA Texture, iron or manganese nodules or concretions, restrictive undance/Contrast lay ors, roof distribution, oxidized drhizospheres, etc. 0-2 A) Sy 3/2 kQ.1Q SAID/(JRJAatC AAf�nr'�T 2 3 ^1 5 7 4 1 I _ A3 i I S � 2• S /� oti AJlC s,►t S 17��p i Gt �y Carp fU7 5A,J,> 3 /1 a1 Remarks: Sketch Landscape Position: I � � V' I I' 'Nee' ti .s ew IeW.ing to waders'. "I the ..e Is NOT hNIAI; SOIL DETERMINATION NOTE: 2. Tx,s oh be.t le was 1r ... by N. H— Enelend Carps of Enye..nt w tee;& u.. d. H. Engle.d Met- may b. In.ypreyl.ls. l TN. W.ryrelne rear.. moy be In.ppr.prlolo In unwed eews. ®� All dominant plants ore OBLIGATE. © AN dominant plants are FACULTATIVE WET AND OBLIGATE and the topographic boundary Is abrupt. O © Soil is frequently PONDED or FLOODED for a duration longer than two weeks during the growing season. (attach an explanation of the basis for your conclusions). ® The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a VERY POORLY DRAINED SOIL' and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. ®� The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a POORLY DRAINED SOIL' and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a SOMEWHAT POORLY DRAINED SOIL that has either of the (allowing two characteristics': Yes NO 1. Within 6 Inches of the soil surface there ore: Yes No O CD a. soil mottles within an A or Ap horizon and the subsoil is mottled throughout; OR b. common to many, distinct or prominent mottles with a matrix of chrome 3 or less; OR C3 CD c. distinct or prominent oxidized rhizospheres and the subsoil Is mottled throughout. 2. Within 24 inches of the soil surface, there are mottles which CD C3 ore common to many, distinct or prominent, and that are chrome 2 or less, and one of the following: Yes No o. In the horizon that lies within 10 inches of the soil surface end directly beneath a dark" A or Ap horizon, the matrix is chrome 3 or less: the mottles are at least 1OX in abundance and distinct or prominent. El a b. When o dork"Ap horizon Is between 10 and 14 inches thick, wetness morphology may be mosked by organic matter. Normally, these problem situations will be considered hydrk when: 1. hydrophytes ore prevalent. It. there is no "once of altered hydrology, and iii, in the horizon that lies directly beneath the Ap horizon, the matrix color is chromo 3 or less and mottles ore at least 10X in abundance and distinct or prominent. Check here and attach a description of your procedures and conclusions if one of the (allowing options were chosen for your hydric soil determination: measured redox potentials, colormetric test for ferrous iron test (a,w,—DipyridiQ, or other measurements and observations. . Typically in New England, soils having these morphologies will be classified In an aquic suborder or on oquic subgroup in soil taxonomy. .. Note: a dark A or Ap Is defined as having a value of 3 or less and a chrome of 2 or Iess Remarks: t. iydrel.ey Is all- the m..l diricvll feel.. le eb..nr., DATA k 2. Wwpr.4aM. mrl NOTE: oM.4w Yr W.p"—. .1u. b.."6— w DETERMINATION real .1IN .wan, r.cMl ..Nn.r e.dlaen, .red r.IwN.d .nreltsne, do HYDROLOGY J. Wwpr.lsaM of ",.logy mey r.q k. r.pect.4 eb—t; ...... mw. Inen Mew .en, ❑ Recorded Data: Stream, lake or lidol gage Identification: Aerial Photograph - Identification: Other Identification: ❑ No Recorded Data Available REPORT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING OBSERVATIONS: Depth to Free Water. Depth to Saturation: Describe Altered Hydrology: Wair ❑ Inundated ❑ Saturated in upper 12in. ❑ Water Marks ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres ❑ Drift Lines ® Water Stained leaves ® Water —borne Sediment ❑ Surfoce Scoured Areas (Welland Drainage Patterns Deposits ❑ No Evidence of Significant Hydrological Modification AND there is one or more Morphological Plant Adaptation SUCH AS: ❑ Pneumotophores ® Buttressed Tress ❑ Hypertrophied Lenticels ❑ Stooling ❑Adventitious Roots ❑ Inflated Leaves, Stems, or Roots ® Shallow Root Systems ❑ Floating Leaves ❑ Aerenchymo in Roots k stems ❑ Polymorphic Leaves ❑ Hydric Soils and NO visible evidence of significant hydrological modification Remarks: CONCLUSIONS Project Title: Home FAgm Delineator. E.C. 9A1&68Aj 6i A4,i Tronsect: Z Plot: U1 % @ Date: m 2000 ��1NalFAti Y Hydrophylic Vegetation Criterion Yes No Met? ® ❑ Hydric Soils Criterion Met? ® ❑ Yes No Welland Hydrology Criterion Met? ® ❑ IS THIS DATAPOINT WITHIN A WETLAND? ❑ Remarks: Project Title. �OMF fARFile Number: Transect: 2 Plol: vplA01> 9> FLA &-ZZ Date: 1� tJ1+1EAtaFa 2600 DATA -- Stratum and Species (DOMINANTSVEGETATION ONLY) Dominance Ratio Percent Dominance NWI Status S-14 ass ? b fAcu rs�cf� urUufiJfa ZC FI�k SNRILSfs ' FRAYI.N! AA LkC4,JA 5 fli cU COA►r03 /(,r'UvI fdJ4 S �� 400n 4 FbA)fOLA S FAc. oe/144a W4 p11: S uJWL H�RQS: MttcN (LA AFIFi1S (3^0(711CA(A PAl(uMyt,jj SO FACE ll dgt 3 TMZI- FAjLA �pr�s �t�eau,��,U TA1A It N f A 1, M OFkLCP^ O M F 60/bA S Fr1 c w QSgd.JDt C"1161UrAAA MCF FA<<t CMEk cDMeAi,IiS S fAC DAy5p eA/DS 1►s rS>Qix WE v ft Tully (Dominants ONLY): OBL: FACW: FAC: FACU: Z UPL: SUM: 2 100 x Dominont(OBL+FACW+FAC)/Tolly Sum b2 Describe Vegetation Disturbance: Describe Problem Vegetation: DATA -- SOIL Soil Taxonomy; Cores of Fn9inaers Re tonal Dro na a Gloss: Criterion: Is Published Soil Survey Available? Yes ® No ❑;Title/Dale:561 YJAJfy � (�1�11fa>EJ Soil Type Mopped: AJJIA;40 WNW, Will Fw.J? Lwi CQUW( , UC 1971f Depth Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell, Moist) Color of Mottles Munsell, Moist) USDA Texture, iron or manganese nodules or concretions, restrictive undance/Conlrosl layers, root distribution, oxidixed rhizospheres, etc. 1_0 0 �ksff o— 3 Q, 1 ayz 3/T Ktost FrrsF 5(,w� �6Ah 3— f At 16Y4 114 N40 F �• 101,E 4%6 Remarks: Sketch Landscape Position: 1 l UfL , U�� I. 9Ue k -aew 1.••.by 1..Ad—. U•1 a,..•s I. NOT WAIC SOIL DETERMINATION NOTE: ch.cssel M v.ae fr v7, by W. N.. [.gland c«p..1 cngln.en; wt..d. IS. J. N" [npte,.d St.l.. may b. tnappepbl.. 1 TN. W«pr.ay. r.uCw may b. koppropkle k umovd AN dominant plants ore OBLIGATE. ® AN dominant plants are FACULTATIVE WET AND OBLIGATE and the topographic boundary Is abrupt. ® Soil is frequently PONDED or FLOODED for a duration longer than two weeks during the growing season. (attach on explanation of the basis for your conclusions). ®The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a VERY POORLY DRAINED SOIL' and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. ®The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a POORLY DRAINED SOIL' and there is no evidence of oilered hydrology. o ® The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a SOMEWHAT POORLY DRAINED SOIL that has either of the following two characteristics': Yes NO 091 1. Within 6 Inches of the soil surface there are: Yes No riot a. soil mottles within on A or Ap horizon LJ and the subsoil is mottled throughout; OR ® b. common to many, distinct or prominent mottles with a matrix of chromo 3 or less; OR ®c. distinct or prominent oxidized rhizospheres and the subsoil Is mottled throughout. ❑ ® 2. Within 24 inches of the soil surface, there are mottles which are common to many, distinct or prominent, and that are chrome 2 or less, and one of the following: Yes No CD ®o. In the horizon that lies within 10 inches of the soil surface and directly beneath a dark" A or Ap horizon, the matrix Is chroma 3 or leas; the mottles ore at least IOX in abundance and distinct or prominent. ® b. When a dark•Ap horizon Is between 10 and 14 inches thick, wetness morphology may be masked by organic matter. Normally, these problem situations will be considered hydrlc when: I. hydrophytes ore prevalent, 0. there is no evidence of altered hydrology, and lii. in the horizon that lies directly beneath the Ap horizon, the matrix color is chroma 3 or less and mottles ore at leost 10X in abundance and distinct or prominent. Check hers and attach a description of your procedures and conclusions if one of the following options were chosen for your hydric soil determination: measured redox potentials, colormatric last for ferrous iron test (a,e.,—D1pyridil), or other measurements and observations. *Typically in New England, soils having these morphologies will be classified In an oquic suborder or on oquic subgroup in soil taxonomy. oe Note: a dark A or Ap is defined as having a value of 3 or less Remarks: I.I dr.logy I. art- th. —t 61nc01 I.aw to .b—.. DATA & I. kt.rp.i.Wn. m,�I —Id.r W .ppr.pd t- . a w eb.—W... k NOTE: DETERMINATION reM or lh..wwn, r.e.nl .eah.r sanfaen., w .a«.r,a .n«ett.n...tc. HYDROLOGY 3. Worpr`e_lebn of Iydrotoey r,ay rogJro repeoted ab—t;on. e", IMI. lrvn OM NOUN ❑ Recorded Data: Stream, lake or tidol gage Identification: Aerial Photograph Identification: Other Identification: ❑ No Recorded Data Available REPORT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING OBSERVATIONS: u Depth to Free Water. Depth to Saturation: Describe Altered Hydrology: ❑ Inundated ❑ Saturated in upper 12in. ❑ Water Marks ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Water Stained leaves ❑ Woter—borne Sediment ❑ Surface Scoured Areas ❑Wetland Drainage Patterns Deposits ❑ No Evidence of Significant Hydrological Modification AND there is one or more Morphological Plant Adaptation SUCH AS: ❑ Pneumolophores ❑ Buttressed Trees ❑ Hypertrophied Lenlicels ❑ Stooling ❑Adventitious Roots ❑ Inflated Leaves, Stems, or Roots ❑ Shallow Root Systems ❑ Floating Leaves ❑ Aerenchyma in Roots & stems ❑ Polymorphic Leaves ❑ Hydric Soils and NO visible evidence of significant hydrological modification Remarks: Project Title: kt*f M>iM CONCLUSIONS Delineator. E• G JJbd*S A V e.tA& s d Transact: 2 Plot: ` UPLAI��n Dole: 4JAfNWtA ZOO, Yes No Hydrophylic Vegetation Criterion Met? ❑ 29 Hydric Soils Criterion Met? ❑ 9 Yes No Welland Hydrology Criterion Met? ❑ ® IS THIS DATAPOINT WITHIN A WETLAND? ❑ Remarks: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 11, 2001 Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. 1855 Williston Road P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sketch Plan, 110 Unit PUD Dear Mr. O'Brien: Enclosed is a copy of the November 21, 2000 Development Review Board minutes on the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum, Planning & Zoning Assistant SM/mcp 1 Encl 125 Kennedy Drive, #35 South Burlington, VT 05403 December 29, 2000 Mr. James Condos, Chair South Burlington City Council 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Condos: In a December issue of The Other Paper, a detailed account of the City's prospective plans to widen Kennedy Drive to four lanes, was described. The residents of the Georgetown Condominium complex noted that there was no provision for a sidewalk on the south side of Kennedy Drive between Hinesburg Road and Kimball Avenue. For many years our residents have had to contend with the increased traffic on Kennedy Drive and the inability to cross to the bike path. The best way to cross is to walk to the corner and cross with the traffic light at either Hinesburg Road or Kimball Avenue. Access to public transportation is now available at either comer. Walling in the street is not an option, especially in the winter. Islands to aid pedestrians and bikers are of no use unless they are at the comer with a traffic light. The volume and the speed of traffic on the road preclude a senior citizen from crossing two lanes of traffic safel The addition of more than 100 new residential units on the O'Brien property behind Georgetown will add more congestion entering onto Kennedy Drive. The Association would appreciate the Council's consideration of our request for a sidewalk. Sincerely, Thomas Crowley President, Georgetown Homeowners Association 40 Existing Meadow F1� ri rT1 l lam` t 1 ♦ ' # ♦QTot Lot �a ,4 Sketch Plan 1 "=60' Context/Local Map 1 "=1000' i na ®�11 .Im it ri �L J� rROWAFA �11�. �" 1 �,�; j�,'NNINIIUO'.-•M� try � {`h�� �ONsellllBllllhr.1r ►p ' .: .!,j -T , y 0 30 120 Graphic Scale xisting �, Vegetation ' / 60' ROW .......... _.� �- preserved j , Open Space Natural Area i Property Boundary 1 "= 400' I\JED pfCE �r 1 Phase A Coverages Coverage Area of Measured in Percentage of Coverage Acres Total Acreage Total Acerage 19.10 100 Road Coverage 4.36 22.8 % Building Coverage 2.05 _ 10.7 Sidewalk Coverage .69 3.6% Total Coverage 7.10 36.3 Green Space Coverage 12.00 62.8 Phase A Density Calculations Acerage Less Existing Area of Lot 1 15%for Base Maximum Proposed Zoning in Acres Infrastructure Density Units R_7 19.11 16.24 113 Units 95 Units Density and Coverage Calculaitons T.J. Boyle d Associates -- O'BflBn Brothers Agency, INC. landscape architectsplanning consults is P. Brody 9-28-00 - 1B5s1MnlstonRoad _ ,� e,dw O'Brien Home Farm South Budington, Vermord 05403 301 college street. Langton. vermont. 05401 802.658.3555 hdp:11—qb.o rn 1"=60' Sketch Plan Bordeau D. & S. Rendall 09� c°j C E.1 sung Meadow O' Wesley Grove Condo Association Georgetwon j Homeowners / Association — ' i Mr y"_ Exlatlrlg _.. __ _—__"" Veggcatlon ` 1g.Plex \, V — a I I commumry Windrid a k ti 9 ;a E \egetation Condo r V E \ ; Association II.eO Rq4 er 1 5 N II � open Space ce c1 1 ��+ b. �G Natural Area } (� F.&B. 1 O'Brien-borne"FariilA���\a "a'. / _',:�_ �� �i /, '1°1-_,.._ - /"�� �`� �It Q +)0. Mahar \ ` --.. _\ �11 7 Burlington 25.5 Acres \ � ,\, � ,,. —, r �—�' 1 \ Y Da -&Leo O Brien 43.5AAAAAAA�res L� 1 1 _�� ♦\\ I ♦ ♦� t\ — �—_..----\ `�\art —� 1� r—.\ �\ \ ♦\ � Imo''— \ \ \\ \ �, \\,-_ `-®\ ♦ S. & A. G. & B. Voldman Hopwood W.&H. ' Weiner '' -•-_ . _ i� , 1 \ R. Ryan 0,1_kowpc, i TJ Boyle. and Associates "'°I°" °a "�° O'Brien Brothers A enc INC. O'Brien Home Farm 9 Y, landscape archllecte. planning consuNants � P. Brody e9•a8-00 1855 Vdlliston Road - SouthSudington,Vennont05403 *college street. budington. vermont. 05401 802.658.3555 httP:,1—w boyie.00m o�"- 1"=100' Contiguous Property KREBS & LANSING, CONSULTING ENGINEER,. NC. 10 Main Street COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 (802) 878-0375 FAX (802) 878-9618 TO Pp rt P26k L.,[RV L.1 1A 0J[F DATE LI f JOB N l f /Z ATTENTION / !/ f RE: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings Ee/ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order Kill' the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 5-1-7 10 3 yz,` y i✓GT ' t' (i ��iAly THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval For your use ❑ As requested REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FORBIDS DUE ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints [I PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US Ali ! IN to i • / i .r r .� COPY TO J tri �Tff" cJ l2 �Li� SIGNED: /t'' ` if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. crn e ot,f C 11-161 G`BRIEN BROTHERS y Agency, Inc. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT May 7 2001 Mr. Lou Bresee Chairman, Recreation Path Committee City of South Burlington South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Recreation path width, O'Brien Home Farm, Route 116 & Kennedy Drive. Dear Mr. Bresee, In regards to the above -mentioned residential project, we need some direction from your committee. We are proposing an asphalt recreation path parallel to the street we are building, and have conflicting thoughts about what the width of the pavement should be. Originally we proposed ten (10) feet, however due to fact that we would prefer to plant the street trees between the recreation path and the street curb, we have concluded that ten (10) feet takes up too much room. Our landscape architect (T.J. Boyle) as well as Craig Lambert (South Burlington City Arborist) has indicated that eight (8) to ten (10) feet of separation between the tree and the street (see attached memo) is highly recommended. In order to come close to this, the bike path width must be reduced. I have enclosed two cross sections for your review. One of them shows an eight- (8) foot recreation path and the other one shows a six- (6) foot recreation path. As far as we are concerned, we would rather construct a six (6) foot path (the same width as the new rec. path that goes through the former Garvey property on Williston Road) than an eight (8) foot path due to the simple fact that there are too many things in this world that are over built, and over paved and even though we are only talking about two feet, it does add up. On the other hand, we do not want to build something that does not work effectively. There in lies our struggle. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at my office. Respectfully submitted, Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Agency Inc. Cc: Juh Beth Hoover, Town Planner w/enclosures Bruce O'Neil, Recreation Director w/enclosures T.J. Boyle w/enclosures 1855 Williston Road • P.O. Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 • (802) 658-5000 • fax 658-5002 e-mail: 0BrienBros@aol.com co OD 03 i ('An vi f Yi t .n No ^LL 6.1. uO Q a rl i ro 77 daa fi.%rA?Mi i7f 60' _ J 3 ` t Lnwvwo j +' t i� s .t�.e..wx::'O; Li ---- .,.,_....tea....,........ ...... 4 t, _....re S:/tr�1' Go cilsr;ro-Yi r � � �--x7r.�Prie; tsystx-..ans `K ,�......-_� on crm :l A& . A i. 94- u t t J irai•,'- mt .44Ax"}`iv _Caw. "(Al dr Zrap'>'c. rce: Ni O �,f �F th 107A Road Rj�k;,j cro!zs S&Ction ARMY 1kv-VIWf' COA&Uffinq 4�%*" Rmy-4 vl&+, lval� -C*Vlt 1�11$01"Rleq-1 A M McMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: Craig Lambert, City Arborist Re: November 21, 2000 Agenda Items Date: October 19, 2000 VT NATIGNA? COUNTRY CLUB - SWIFT STREET PARCEL — Street trees: suggest a substitute for Little Leaf Linden as it is becoming planted quite frequently in South Burlington. — I would also recommend that Oak Species be something ether than Pin Oak, possibly Bur Oak or Red Oak. — Freeman maple would also be an acceptable substitute for Red Maple to diversify species in the city tree population. O'BRIEN PROPERTY — Trees in tree belt between roadway and recreation path should be located no closer than six (6) feet from road where possible. — Trees along collector road should be placed farther from the road and closer to the property line. — A minimum setback of six (6) feet from the road is suggested and eight (8) to ten (10) feet highly recommended where possible. — Until plant species are selected, more specific recommendations would not be possible. t ? •� � 14 w T. J. Boyle and Associates 9 Landscape Architects . Planning Consultants KREBS & LANSIN11 CONSULTING ENGINEERgg, INC. 10 Main Street COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 (802) 878-0375 FAX (802) 878-9618 TO I&h,j-jovver 1—L Qr�f WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Prints ❑ Change order ❑ Plans LLIEUCTIF. �0 00 I DATE 6/ZC. /m! JOB NO. ATTENTION ,° 8e /A RE: l nnu a V [Ss L/ the following items: ❑ Samplo! N 2 700cifications MY of So. Burlington COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval 1d For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS V✓t a M_ COPY TO /°i 0,60-cam ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at one . F°6t I� i s It Ib g 1�' I I �a ll" jaa aQ ���a ,�Q lil gFIa� VIl` �F1 1. F ct Ail b A Jill,F ba 6fb °l .1 ,, Q � t' g it 5 f �g M a aga mf�a QFt V1 �e , ea6wy auu 116 Rand / / 8 g k k A (� q I • J%559-W I I �dory -2B N�µ11 ;fig I 1 � .x � b L91 I N86701JOnW iov gg ,C MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board p P, From: Raymond J. BelaiI Adirimistrative Officer Re: November 21, 2000 agenda items Date: November 17, 2000 3) DAN & LEO O'BRIEN — SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION — 110 UNIT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OLD FARM ROAD & KENNDY DRIVE This project consists of a sketch plan for a planned unit development in which two lots totaling 69 acres are subdivided into six lots where lots 1,2,3, & 4 total 19.1 acres and lots 5 & 6 total 49.9 acres. The planned unit development will result in: 1) lot one developed with 46 multi -family residential units in 15 buildings, 2) lot two developed with 64 multi -family residential units in 7 buildings, 3) an undeveloped lot (lot three), 4) a community park (lot four), 5) a remaining lot including the existing buildings located at 200 Old Farm Road (lot five), and 6) a remaining lot including the existing buildings located at 255 Kennedy Drive (lot six), 200 Old Farm Road & 255 Kennedy Drive. This property is located between Old Farm Road, Kennedy Drive, and Hinesburg Road within the Residential Seven and Residential One Districts. It is bounded on the east by Old Farm Road, on the north by Kennedy Drive, on the west by residences, and on the south by Hinesburg Road and residences. Lot size/Frontage: The proposed lots meet frontage requirements as well as minimum lot size. The preliminary plat submittal should include the approximate acreage of each proposed lot and a perimeter survey of the entire property. Density: The base maximum density for lots one through four combined is 113 units, and 110 units are being proposed. The applicant should address possible restrictions for lots three and four if the density of these lots is to be used for the units on lots one and two. Proposed City Street: The preliminary plat application should address the City's standards for streets and which streets are to be made public. The applicant should also address Sections 401.10)(2) and 401.1(k)(2) of the Subdivision Regulations with regards to the proposed public street on lot four and the private street on lot two. Proposed Park: The applicant has submitted a letter briefly addressing the Neighborhood Park requirement of the Official City Map. The preliminary plat application should address the type of facilities proposed as well as the ownership of this park. It appears this park is intended to remain private. The Official City Map shows a proposed public park area in this location. This issue needs to be addressed. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO NOVEMBER 21, 2000 MEETING School Impact: The applicant should submit a correspondence from the South Burlington School District at preliminary plat evaluating the potential impact this project will have on the school system. Street Lights: The applicant should provide street lights along all public streets. Utilities: The preliminary plat application should include sewer & water main details as well as details of all proposed storm water facilities and sediment control. Other: The preliminary plat application should include a proposed street name and street numbers. The preliminary plat should be stamped by a licensed surveyor and note base flood elevations. Section 412 of the Subdivision Regulations should also be addressed concerning preservation of site amenities such as trees, drainageways, historic sites, and other features. Section 417(g) of the Subdivision Regulations should also be addressed concerning potential views and wildlife habitat. A report should be submitted addressing the PUD criteria under Section 26.151 of the Zoning Regulations. All buildings should be numbered. Proposed Lot One as Seen From Hinesburg Road Access/Circulation: Access is proposed via a 32 foot wide street leading from Hinesburg Road to Kennedy Drive. The applicant should address at preliminary plat which streets 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO NOVEMBER 21, 2000 MEETING will be public as well as the standards for City Streets. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/Setbacks: The maximum coverages for the Residential Seven District are 20% building coverage and 40% total coverage. The plans depict that lots one through four will have a combined building coverage of 10.7% and a total coverage of 36.3%. The preliminary plat application should break out coverages by lot. All setback requirements are not being met. The applicant should list the setback waivers requested including the location and the amount of waiver requested. Traffic: The property is located within several traffic overlay zones. The applicant should submit a traffic impact study with the preliminary plat application. Lim All lights must be downcasting and shielded. The preliminary plat should include cut sheets for all proposed exterior lights and the height of pole mounted lights. Landscaping: A landscaping schedule noting the number, variety, and size of proposed plantings should be submitted with the preliminary plat application. The site planting should be separated from the street trees. Sewer: The preliminary plat application should include a sewer allocation request. Impact Fees: The applicant should be aware that all impact fees will be applicable to the proposed new residences. Dumpsters: The applicant should note the type of screening for the dumpsters on the preliminary plat plan. Any dumpsters proposed for lot one should be shown. Parking: A total of 104 parking spaces are required for the development on lot one and 115 spaces are being provided. A total of 144 spaces are required for the development on lot two and 139 spaces are being provided. This is a five (5) space or 3.5% shortfall. The applicant should be prepared to justify the shortfall. Bike racks should be provided throughout the development. Handicapped spaces should be provided for the units on lot two. Recreation Path: The applicant is proposing a recreation path along the collector road connecting Kennedy Drive with Hinesburg Road. The Recreation Path Committee has reviewed the plans and submitted comments (see enclosed). Wetlands: The preliminary plat application should include wetland boundaries delineated by a wetland expert. Official Map: The Official Map shows a proposed City street connecting Old Farm Road and Hinesburg Road. This road is shown on sheet two of the plans. The Board shall discuss how this future street would connect to the proposed development. The Official Map also shows recreation paths and a proposed park (see enclosed). DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO NOVEMBER 21, 2000 MEETING Other: The minimum size of the proposed units should be noted on the preliminary plat application as well as if a height waiver will be needed. Staff requests typical elevations of the proposed units at preliminary plat. The applicant may also wish to submit a request for phasing of the development. The timing of infrastructure, such as the full build out of proposed public roads, should be addressed. This should be done at preliminary plat if phasing is needed. 4) FAIRWAY ESTATES, LLC. — FINAL PLAT — 23 TOWNHOUESE UNITS, ECONOMOU FARM ROAD This project consists of amending a planned residential development consisting of 297 residential units and an 18 hole golf course. The amendment consists of combining fourteen (14) single family lots into one (1) lot and constructing eleven (11) duplex units and one single family dwelling for a total of nine additional units resulting in 306 units total in the development, Economou Farm Road. The Development Review Board approved the preliminary plat application for this project on October 3, 2000 (minutes enclosed). The property is located in the Southeast Quadrant District. It is bounded on the north by Swift Street, on the east and south by the golf course, and on the west by single family residences. Access: Access to the duplexes will be provided via Economou Farm Road, a proposed public street. A performance bond for this street has already been submitted and construction is underway. Coverage/Setbacks: The proposed building coverage is 5.35% (20% max) and the total proposed coverage is 23.1 % (40% max). The plans should be revised to include building and total lot coverages for the entire development. Densi : The proposal will increase the total number of units in the development by nine units bringing the total to 306 units. This results in a density of 0.68 units/acre. The maximum density is 1.2 units per acre. Open Space Corridor: The Open Space Corridor has been delineated on the plans. No units are proposed within the Corridor. School Impact: The applicant has submitted a letter stating that the proposed project will have less of an impact on the schools than the previously approved plan (see enclosed). Traffic: The applicant has updated the traffic study for the overall development and estimates that the proposed amendment will result in a traffic decrease (see enclosed). Lighting: The applicant has proposed four 250 watt, metal halide fixtures with internal cut- off reflectors streetlights. Cut sheets for all proposed lights must be submitted for review by the Director of Planning and Zoning. All lights must be downcasting and shielded. 4 Act ; ID j Orig Early 1 Description Dur Start Begin Project 1 020CT00 Field Survey and Mapping 30 02OCT00 Early Finish Proj ct Schedule Project No. NH 1�1-1(1) in South Burlington - z000 �-- - 2001 _ — zooz OCTI NOV J DEC JAN FES MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG I SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR Begin Project Field Survey and Mapping r Traffic Data Collection Traffic Data Analysis Develop Conceptual Plans L►006� City and VTrans Review of Conceptual Plans �► VTrans Review of CE i ❑Public Informational Meeting P-�� Prepare Categorical Exclusion � Final Revisions to Conceptual Plans Final Categorical Exclusion L. Conceptual Design Approval ► Preliminary Plans ► Preliminary Plans Review -------------------------- Utility Relocation Design Final Design Drawings I Final Design Review ��-" Contract Drawings o Bid Phase i Award Contract Ls� Preliminary Right -of -Way Plans ► Right -of -Way Appraisals �+► Right -of -Way Acquisitions and Negotiations 1-1.1= Final Right -of -Way Plans Permitting I 1000 020CT00 10NOV00 230CT00 1020 1030 Traffic Data Collection 15 030CT00 1040 Traffic Data Analysis 20 240CT00 20NOV00 27DEC00 25JAN01 1140 Develop Conceptual Plans 30 13NOV00 1150 City and VTrans Review of Conceptual Plans 20 28DEC00 1155 VTrans Review of CE 20 28DEC00 25JAN01 02MAR01 1160 Public Informational Meeting Prepare Categorical Exclusion 5 26FEB01 1170 20 29NOV00 27DEC00 1185 Final Revisions to Conceptual Plans 10 05MAR01 16MAR01 1190 Final Categorical Exclusion 10 05MAR01 16MAR01 1200 Conceptual Design Approval 5 19MAR01 23MAR01 1300 Preliminary Plans 50 05MAR01 11 MAY01 10JUL01 1350 Preliminary Plans Review 40 14MAY01 1375 Utility Relocation Design 30 14MAY01 25JUN01 10DEC01 1400 Final Design Drawings 40 120CT01 1450 Final Design Review 20 11DEC01 09JAN02, 1475 Contract Drawings 15 10JAN02 30JAN02 1480 Bid Phase 20 31JAN02 28FEB02 01 MAR02 1490 Award Contract Preliminary Right -of -Way Plans 1 01 MAR02 1500 30 12JUN01 24JUL01 21AUG01 26NOV01 10DEC01 1525 Right -of -Way Appraisals 20 25JUL01 1550 Right -of -Way Acquisitions and Negotiations Final Right -of -Way Plans Permitting 66 22AUG01 1600 10 27NOV01 80 14MAY01 2000 05SEP01 - _- - � Early bar KennedyDrive Improvements Progress bar P � Critical bar McFarland -Johnson Summary bar Start milestone point Finish milestone point Start date 020CT00 Finish date 01 MAR02 Data date 020CT00 Run date 05SEP00 Page number 1A 0 Primavera Systems, Inc. 630 Hinesburg Road, Wellesley Grove #2, South Burlington, Vt.05403 Developmental Board South Burlington, Vt. I am writing this letter to inform you of my concerns over the O'Brien Planned Unit Development on Hinesburg Road The traffic on Hinesburg Road has increased in the past 4 years, since I have moved here. Cars and large trucks have increased their use of this road to avoid Dorset Street. The Butler Farms, new Concord Green Condominiums and, other neighborhoods have added to the use. Another large development will add substantially increase the traffic problems on the road The other problem it the water in the land, during a rainstorm the water runs down the road and lands in large puddles on the lawns. The land behind Wellesley Grove is always marshy even in the winter. There are several wet lands surrounding our complex. This development will also make an impact on the schools and school bus routes. I understand the city wants to keep the density in certain areas and that this development has offered a section land for a park. [ This was reported on the Channel #3 news last night.) I do hope the Developmental Board will consider these concerns, unfortunately I can not attend this meeting as I have a prior commitment. I do plan to attend any future meetings. The Wellesley Grove Condominium Association will discuss this problem at our ext Board meeting. Marjorie VonOhlsen CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 17, 2000 Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. 1855 Williston Road P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sketch Plan, 110 Unit PUD Dear Mr. O'Brien: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Department, City Arborist and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, November 21, 2000 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp Encls MORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: November 21, 2000 Agenda Items Date: November 17, 2000 PINE TREE APARTMENTS - WILLISTON ROAD 1. The entrance drive serving five units should be two way at least 20 feet in width. 2. The end of the drive should have a turn around. 3. The nearest fire hydrant should be shown on the plan. 4. City Water Department should have a copy of the plan for their review. O'BRIEN HOME FARM - HINESBURG ROAD - KENNEDY DRIVE 1. The 110 or so (as in today is so long) units will generate an estimate of 25,000 to 30,000 gallons of sewage a day. The 8 inch sewer main along Hinesburg Road will serve this project. Sections of this main may not hays the capacity for all these units. This must be studied to determine its capacity. 2. The lot 4 loop road should be a minimum of 24 feet of traveled width. If this street is to become a City street, over night parking during the winter months will not be allowed. There should be at least a 5 foot grassed strip between the street parking and the sidewalk for snow storage. Snow removal from the street parking will most likely require trucking off site. This should be reviewed because it does place an extra burden on the City. r To. South Burlington Development Review Board From., Scuth Burlington Fire Department Rem November 21, 2000 agenda items Date: October 31, 2000 I. Sketch (Plan, 1386 Williston Road The proposed multi -Family should be sprinklered 2. Final Plat, 60 Farrell Street The building should be sprinklered and have a fire alarm 3. Sketch 'Plain and :Site Plan, Kennedy Drive and ®Id Farm Road All buildings should be sprinklered and have fire alarms. The applicant should consult with the Fire Department on the location of fire hydrants. 4. Final Plat, Fairway Estates, Swift Street Acceptable MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: Craig Lambert, City Arborist Re: November 21, 2000 Agenda Items Date: October 19, 2000 VT NATIONAL COUNTRY CLUB - SWIFT STREET PARCEL — Street trees: suggest a substitute for Little Leaf Linden as it is becoming planted quite frequently in South Burlington. — I would also recommend that Oak Species be something other than Pin Oak, possibly Bur Oak or Red Oak. — Freeman maple would also be an acceptable substitute for Red Maple to diversify species in the city tree population. — Trees in tree belt between roadway and recreation path should be located no closer than six (6) feet from road where possible. — Trees along collector road should be placed farther from the road and closer to the property line. — A minimum setback of six (6) feet from the road is suggested and eight (8) to ten (10) feet highly recommended where possible. — Until plant species are selected, more specific recommendations would not be possible. O!BRIEN BROTHERS ARency, Inc. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT Ms. Sarah MacCallum November 8, 2000 Mr. Ray Belair South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: SD-00-54 Sketch Plan - 110 Unit PRD, Old Farm Road Dear Sarah & Ray, Thank you for taking the time to meet with me and for the follow up letter in regards to this application. In regards to the outlined issues in your letter, I will address them in the order in which they are written. a) This application is for 110 units. 54 units in the 8 & 12-plex style buildings and 46 townhouse style units. b) The plans have been revised to clearly label existing versus proposed lot lines. c) The graphic scale has been adjusted. d) We are not proposing any phasing. Due to the inadequate supply of housing we plan to commence this project as soon as all applicable state, federal and local permits are obtained. e) In regards to the Neighborhood Park, the 1996 Comprehensive Plan - Map 2- Recreation, does propose a recreation area in this vicinity. On page 47 of the Comprehensive Plan, the recommendation that is outlined for this proposed park says, "This Park should provide passive recreation (e.g. playlot, swing sets, etc.) as active recreation facilities are provided at the proposed City Park on Dorset Street." Therefore, we have designed this park with that in mind. We are proposing that the land for this park will be on a separate lot that will be donated to the city. We do have a meeting set up with the recreation department to get their feedback on this proposal. f) Zoning boundaries have been added to the site plan. g) We do recognize that impact fees will apply to this project. h) In regards to wildlife or archaeological resources, our consultants are currently doing the work and their reports will be incorporated into our preliminary application. If you have further questions, or need any additional information please contact my o fice. atrick O'Brien Project Manager O'Brien Brothers Agency Inc. 1855 Williston Road • P.O. Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 • (802) 658-5000 • fax 658-5002 e-mail: OBrienBros@aol.com � O'Brien Property 11/17/00 .'•�;• Proposed Paths Existing Paths Rec Areas NATURAL [- PROPOSED PUBLIC PRIVATE Tax Map Parcels rr_ •r 62�30 r� 1rI�rII This map was produced from the Official City Map coverage of the City of south Burlington Planning & /1 00 0 400 800 1 200 Feet Zoning Dept coverages for planning purposed `t only. Please see the Dept. for a copy of the certified City Map. N W+E s O'Brien Property 11/17/00 N Parcel Lines Proposedrds Proposed Paths Stec Areas PROPOSED 6 This map was produced from the Official City Map coverage of the City of South Burlington Planning & /) oo O 400 800 20o Feet Zoning Dept coverages for planning purposed '7 only. Please see the Dept. for a copy of the certified City Map. W+ 5 O'Brien Property 11/17/00 Parcel Lines �6 ARr FPO ti. . 01 +. p This map was produced from the Official City Map coverage of the City of South Burlington Planning & /� 00 0 400 800 1 200 Feet Zoning Dept coverages for planning purposed `t only. Please see the Dept. for a copy of the certified City Map. To: Applicants From: Sarah MacCallum, City of South Burlington RE: Project Staff Notes Date: November 3, 2000 SD-00-54 Sketch Plan —110 Unit PRD, Old Farm Road Previous Action: None Overview: The applicant has proposed a 110 unit planned residential development subdivision. Issues: ■ The applicant should clarify if the subdivision is 110 units as stated on the application or 95 units as stated on the site plans. ■ The plans should be revised to clearly label existing lot lines versus proposed lot lines. ■ The graphic scale on the site plans should be accurate and scalable. ■ The applicant should provide a proposed timeline for the project and any potential phasing. ■ A neighborhood park is indicated as being located within the project boundaries. The applicant should address this issue. ■ Zoning boundaries should be indicated on the site plan. ■ The applicant should note that all impact fees will be applicable. ■ Staff will ask the applicant to address any potential wildlife or archaeological resources present on the site at preliminary plat as part of Section 417 of the Subdivision Regulations. Completeness of Plan: The applicant has submitted sufficient information for Development Review Board to consider the sketch plan with the exceptions noted above. Additional information should be submitted by November 14, 2000. Recommendation: Staff recommends that this application be authorized to proceed for sketch plan review at the November 21, 2000 Development Review Board meeting. No Text t 7 I -Sw �� � G zv -�:� � -- �o4 T. I BOYLE AND ASSOCl/ )S Landscape Architects & Planning Consultants 301 College Street BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 (802) 658-3555 FAX (802) 863-1562 TO a-1 I�`TALC 1.lLL L11y1 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Change order ❑ CLM`4vic-'J JCS 4 % ITC 1u` vll DATE JOB NO. I ATTENTION RE: ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 5 20 Burlington THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval V, For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections El ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: ` mm� If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 TO: From Fam vat.: Phosws pago= `G Re: -s'�e �G �' f S < �'/'� r OC: 1 -)ZECEIVED CITY OF SOUTH BURL I NGTON W w_ - J Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN �Ity E 1) Name, address, and phone number of: S0. Bl.ICliC1gt©p a. Owner of record D AN e Leo r;a,A mac-- 0-- OR 11 I I nn " g b. Applicant]04,N , t4o O i ie-h -'�`,r C. Contact PCA�AJC-j'Z' 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and propose use (s) . w�,,�,►-. �� co�� , Tke purr005&— is SvaJ►uldo flAIs (mold win a Al, nee- C) )o-� t j . i� . 7At IJAP o to 4JV1 1 co; i I b-e 6 lye r foW,-1 ,fe- S/ yrL /1t*. 1-�P ( P �z ►I► be- c^ 61/ av;Z O noMal,Qy ems, s ,sk 6106 -8 flexS t—d 1',jo 1a- hexs . 3) Applicant's 1 gal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc Aim 14I 4) Names ofAown(ers of record of all contiguous properties I t �' 1 n P - - Lid ✓1 - P(,rA-A/ 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. 1 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, ,storrm drainage, etc. / ,y„` �A 3� Oolleyk'e /C Pi► N e 41 (//'/ ✓< < G,/ � //.J fa n/ c� �lvcc�; h v ti � c �^� �✓-fY.u-tlt 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affects the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: A//� 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (8} x 11, 8} x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the following information: a) Name and address of the owner of record and applicant. b) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. c) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). d) Boundaries and area of: 1) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record, and 2) proposed subdivision. e) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. f) Type of, location, and size of existing and proposed streets, structures, utilities, and open space. g) Existing zoning boundaries. h) Existing water courses, wetlands, floodplains, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features. i) Location of existing septic systems and wells. j) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. k) All applicable information required for a site plan, as provided in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a commercial or industrial complex, multi -family project, planned unit development, or planned residential develypi>Tent. % p V Q (Signature) applicant or contact person Date S ri,r-CEIVED CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR L� SITE PLAN REVIEW cav of So. BurWlgtoo All inferratic'n-ecuested on this application must be completed in"full. Failure to provide the reguestec :� Crmatcr either cr.'his appiicaticn form or on the site plan will result in your acciicaticn 'beirg -ejected and a ueiay it the review before the Develcoment Review Board. :y' E z. RECCRC'Narre as sr�,cwr, 3r, deed 'ling actress, _�hcne and fax #') osyD -7 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 3'!_-ON`.'.-T PER&C'M (game, �r.aiw-7g address. phone and *,ax 4; 4&� PD. Ok' 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Ty. D 5) 7A_X MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at ,assessor's Office) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION all Existir g Wises on Propel (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed uses (include description remain) Lc-1,* -1, 416 U. , /. /S" 13o, (f 4Ya. � 6 y Uti,'t. '7 A d size of each new use and existing uses to c) Tot/al building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) >f J%` .1 , q� �/N/ A A,i A a //.,1,,:( AM&,,P 11vTu/PeAl /T'Dn A^j ,JOnn S F j" �- 4k 2 Uvff 1,100 /S o0 S. �= w� lie ccl,Pr/ �rwra�C� ' C� i;�- PA5 eo-,& p"k d) Height,of building & -number of doors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) ,a) Number of residential units (if app icable, new units and existing units to remain) 6 f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): q) Other ,list any ether nfcrmaticn pertinent to this application not soecifically requested 7) LOT CCVERACE //ee- --FA ,3L6r a) Building: Existing ::�-cccsec b) Overall ,buiidirg, parking, o tside storage, etc) Existing -Al % Proposed c) Front yarn (along each street) Existing % Proposed A % $) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): ee o/% to . o 9) ESTIMATED RAFFiC a) Average daily traffic ( in and out) b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour (In and out): 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby c-ertify that ail the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNA-'URE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: FJ Complete Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date (Apfrmsp) EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced ccpy (11" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. • Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) • Survey data (distance and acreage) • Contours (existing and finished) • Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping • Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways • Zoning boundaries • dumber and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) • Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) • Location of septic tanks (if applicable) • Location of any easements • Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard • North arrow • Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date • Exterior lighting details (must be down casting and shielded) • Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) • Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE New Application $ 60.00* Amendment $ 35.00' Includes $10.00 recording fee (Apfrmsp) UBRIEN BROTHERS Agency, Inc. R E A L E S T A T E D E V E L O P M E N T A N D M A N A G E M E N T Subdivision Application - Dan & Leo O'Brien List of owners of record of all contiguous properties. Robert Ryan William & Marla Weiner Gardner & Beverley Hopwood Steven & Anne Voldman Donald & Sandra Rendall Forman Bourdeau Frederick & Mary Barbara Maher Wellesley Grove Condominium Association Georgetown Homeowners Association Windridge Homeowners Association 1855 Williston Road • P.O. Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 • (802) 658-5000 • fax 658-5002 e-mail: OBrienBros@aol.com T. J. BOYLE AND ASSOCII Landscape Architects & Planning Consultants 301 College Street BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 (802) 658.3555 FAX (802) 863-1562 TO O`S -,E)-� 6-06P- L— Z WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints - I "PIans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ �C�44C� �� 4QQa��044Q� DATE,. M JOB NO. ATTENTIO C',1�A RE: the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use V.9s requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US VED GUY Of sn. T!7 COPY TO SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 0� BRIEN BROTHERS Agency, Inc REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAC E M EN T Mary Beth Hoover, Town Planner May 22, 2001 Development Review Board Members RECEIVED City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 MAY 2 J 2001 Dear Mary Beth & all Boardmembers, of nr ington Enclosed you will find all of the required criteria for this six lot subdivision ana-IO uni development. You will also find various items that are not specifically requested but nevertheless important when creating a project of this scale. As you may know, my brother Leo Jr. and I have owned this property for many years. In our earlier years we ran a successful dairy farm operation from the barn on Old Farm Road. Back then, the meadow that is proposed for this development was in crop rotation and the wooded section that is proposed for this development was pastureland. In more recent years, my nephew Leo 111 has harvested the hay from this meadow and the wood lot has been left to grown up into a forest, which now consists mainly of eastern white pine. After much discussion between Leo and I we decided to pursue the development of this portion of the home farm. Once that decision was made, we decided to utilize the professional services of Terry Boyle and his associates to work with us to come up with the conceptual plan that we submitted to you for sketch plan review. Since that review, we have continued to work closely with Terry, as well as Mike Burke of Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers to bring the conceptual plan into what we have presented you with today. We have also met with the neighbors to hear their concerns on three occasions and hope to meet with them once again before this next meeting. We have chosen Roger Dickinson of Lamoureux & Dickinson to do the traffic analysis and Bill Countryman and associates to do the wetland analysis. Their assessments are enclosed for your review. As you will see, we do take the environment very seriously when developing all of our projects. In fact, our development company (O'Brien Brothers Agency Inc.) has won the very prestigious "environmental excellence " award for two years in a row for residential subdivisions in Jericho and Shelburne. We worked very hard to earn these very significant awards and we hope to win with this project as well. The awards are given by the Home Builders and Remodelers Association of Northern Vermont whose membership includes most of the developers in Chittenden County. Due to the number of subdivisions that have been built or have been under construction in the past two years, winning these awards, back to back was even more gratifying. My nephew Patrick O'Brien, is the project manager for this project. He has been working with Leo and I at O'Brien Brothers Agency for over ten years, and does the majority of the development work for us. Please consider this a formal notification that he is hereby granted permission to apply for and present to you any and all information that is needed for the permitting of this project. Re ectfully subm' ed,� Daniel J. O'Brie 1855 Williston Road • P.O. Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 • (802) 658-5000 • fax 658-5002 e-mail: OBrienBros@aol.com LOT COVERAGES FOR O'BRIEN HOME FARM Lot 1 (8.5 acres or 370,260 s.f.) Parking/Roads = 54,701 s.f. 14.8% SidewalkBikepath = 3,070 s.f. 0.8% Buildings = 60,391 s.f. 16.3% Total Coverage = 31.9% Lot 2 (5.3 acres or 230,868 s.f.) Parking/Roads = 35,061 s.f. 15.2% SidewalkBikepath = 6,010 s.f. 2.6% Buildings = 39,600 s.f. 17.2% Garages = 9,500 s.f. 4.1% Total Coverage = 39.1 % New ROW (2.7 acres or 117,612 s.E) Road = 61,830 s.f. 52.6% Bikepath = 14,149 s.f. 12.0% Total Coverage = 64.6% Lot 3 (0.25 acres or 10,890 s.f.) Sidewalk = 369 s.f. 3.4% Lot 4 (1.9 acres or 82,764 s.C) None Lot 1 Front Yard Area 65,310 s.f. Lot 1 Front Yard Coverage 1,840.5 s.f. Percent Front Yard Coverage Lot 1 2.8% Lot 2 Front Yard Area 29,010 s.f. Lot 2 Front Yard Coverage 4,467.5 s.f. Percent Front Yard Coverage Lot 2 15.4% 00182:1ot oovaaM Overall Site Coverage Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 and ROW (18.65 acres or 812,394 s.f.) Parking, Roads/Sidewalks = 175,190 s.f. 21.6% Buildings = 99,991 s.f. 12.3% Accessory Buildings = 9,500 s.f. 1.2% Total Coverage = 35.1% O'BRIEN HOME FARM ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Parcel 0860-00636 Parcels 0860-0063OR001 to Parcels 0970-00125R001 to O'Brien Brothers 0860-0063OR025 0970-00125RO48 P.O. Box 2184 Wellesley Grove Condominium Georgetown Homeowners Assn. South Burlington, VT 05407 See attached list. See attached list. Parcels 0970-00175RO01 to Parcel 1260-00205 Parcel 1260-00105 0970-00175RO17 Robert P. Ryan William D. & Maria K. Weiner Windridge Homeowners Assn. 205 Old Farm Road 105 Old Farm Road South Burlington VT 05403 South Burlington VT 05403 See attached list. Parcel 1260-00103 Parcel 1260-00075 Parcel 1260-00051 Gardner & Beverly Hopwood Steven H. & Annie B. Voldman Donald & Sandra Rendall 103 Old Farm Road 75 Old Farm Road 51 Old Farm Road South Burlington VT 05403 South Burlington VT 05403 South Burlington VT 05403 Parcel 0860-00666 Parcel 0860-00660 Forman & Joyce Bourdeau Mary & Frederick J. Maher, Jr. 666 Hinesburg Road P.O. Box 2331 South Burlington VT 05403 South Burlington VT 05407 00162:adjoinas MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM 1 05-15-2001. 12:51:28 South Burlington / Release: 3/9199 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 1 SELECTION FACTOR(S) FACTOR LOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT CONNECTOR 1 0860-0063OR001 0860-0063OR999 RECORD LISTING 0 w n 0 C P e w i a r n t r e Y c N r / e a S 1 m A t e d a I d t --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D 1 r e 5065 0860-0063OR CERASOLI CHARLES & ELIZABETH 1 WELLESLEY GROVE 630 HINESBURG RD S BURLINGTON VT 5066 0860-0063OR VON OHLSEN MARJORIE 630 HINESBURG RD #2 WELLESLEY GROVE S BURLINGTON VT 5067 0860-0063OR SWANSON MYRA 3 WELLESLEY GROVE 630 HINESBURG RD S BURLINGTON VT 5068 0860-0063OR STEVENSON GAIL B 4 WELLESLEY GROVE 630 HINESBURG RD S BURLINGTON VT 5069 0860-0063OR LILIIENTHAL PATRICIA ANN 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 5 S BURLINGTON VT 5070 0860-0063OR PERROTTE KENNETH & JOYCE 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 6 5071 0860-0063OR GORANIN NANCY CO -TRUSTEE 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 7 5072 0860-0063OR HOOPER MONIKA & LEWIN TRUSTEES 286 GOVERNORS LANE 5073 0860-0063OR WINTER KARI JOY 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT#9 5074 0860-0063OR CLAVELOUX RUTH M REVOCABLE TRU 630 HINESBURG RD #10 5075 0860-0063OR STEVENS ROBERT E & PEARL M 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 11 5076 0860-0063OR LABOUNTY WALTER P & THERESA E 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 12 5077 0860-0063OR WALKER SCOTT E 2202 WHITNEY POINT DR 5078 0860-0063OR FAIR ROBERT E JR NCR USG-2 5079 0860-0063OR IRELAND SCOTT D & STEPHEN D P 0 BOX 2286 5080 0860-0063OR PEARLMUTTER MELVIN & EDITH 5712 0860-0063OR LEW RICHARD R & MARY W 5082 0860-0063OR STANLEY HAZEL G 5081 0860-0063OR KRAHN MARJORIE E 5084 0860-0063OR BARNARD CAROL B 5085 0860-0063OR O'ROURKE JOHN L & MARY B 5086 0860-0063OR VELADOTA LAWRENCE J 5087 0860-0063OR WULFSON JOAN L 5088 0860-0063OR STRUBLE SUSAN D 24 records were listed 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 16 18 EAST TERRACE 18 WELLESLEY GROVE 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 19 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 20 21 WELLESLEY GROVE 22 WELLESLEY GROVE 630 HINESBURG RD 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 23 630 HINESBURG RD UNIT 24 S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT SHELBURNE VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT CLARKSON VALLEY MO DAYTON OH S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT P r 0 P Z i P L 0 C c 0 a d t e n 05403 HINESBURG RD630 05403 HINESBURG ROO U 05403 WELLESLEY GROVE 05403 HINESBURG ROD U 05403 HINESBURG ROO U 05403 HINESBURG ROO U 05403 HINESBURG ROO U 05482 HINESBURG ROO U 05403 630 HINESBURG R 05403 HINESBURG RD UN 05403 HINESBURG RD UN 05403 HINESBURG RD UN 63005 HINESBURG RD UN 45479 HINESBURG RD UN 05407 HINESBURG RD UN 05403 HINESBURG RD UN 05403 WELLESLEY GROVE 05403 HINESBURG RD UN 05403 HINESBURG RD UN 05403 HINESBURG RD UN 05403 WELLESLEY GR 21 05403 WELLESLEY GROVE 05403 HINESBURG RD UN 05403 HINESBURG RD UN MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM ' 05-15-2001. 12:51:29 ' South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504POO.6D0 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 2 SUMMARIES OF 24 RECORDS IN INDEX# 1 COL. FACTOR TYPE SUM MEAN STD.DEV. 1 1 Parcel ID STR 2 2 Owner Name 1 STR 3 4 Owner Addr STR 4 5 City/State STR 5 6 Zip Code STR 6 7 Prop. Locatn STR MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM 05-15-2001. 12:29:43 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 1 SELECTION FACTOR(S) FACTOR LOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT CONNECTOR 1 0970-00175RO01 0970-00175RO48 RECORD LISTING 0 w n 0 C P e w i a r n t Z r e y i c N r / p e a S 1 m A t C e d a o I d t d --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D 1 r e e 2442 0970-00175R HEDGER ADAM 175 KENNEDY DR #1 WINDRIDGE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 1 KEN 2443 0970-00175R DION JAMES P 2 WINDRIDGE 175 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 2 KEN 2444 0970-00175R KENNEDY MICHAEL 175 KENNEDY OR #3 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 3 KEN 2445 0970-00175R WILSON CHARLES T & JANE K 175 KENNEDY DR #4 WINDRIDGE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 4 KEN 2446 0970-00175R NIELSEN DAVID 5 WINDRIDGE 175 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 5 KEN 2447 0970-00175R CASEY THOMAS 6 WINDRIDGE 125 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 6 KEN 2448 0970-00175R TRUAX JEFFREY & SARAH 7 WINDRIDGE 175 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 7 KEN 2449 0970-00175R HALDEMAN MARK G 8 WINDRIDGE 175 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 8 KEN 2450 0970-00175R SURETTE KRISTINE M 9 WINDRIDGE 175 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 9 175 2451 0970-00175R BRUNELLE DANIEL P P 0 BOX 8315 BURLINGTON VT 05401 WINDRIDGE 10 KE 2452 0970-00175R LANGLOIS LINDA A 11 WINDRIDGE 175 KEN OR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 11 KE 2453 0970-00175R GRIMES CHRISTOPHER SR & SUSAN 175 KENNEDY DR 12 WINDRIDGE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 12 KE 2454 0970-00175R RICKNER ROBERT H JR 13 WINDRIDGE 175 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 13 KE 2455 0970-00175R GENDRON LISA MARIE 175 KENNEDY DR #14 WINDRIDGE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 14 KE 2456 0970-00175R SMITH HEIDI A 15 WINDRIDGE 175 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 15 KE 2457 0970-00175R MCGUINESS ELIZABETH A 5 A JERICHO RD ESSEX JCT VT 05452 WINDRIDGE 16 KE 2458 0970-00175R FLEMING JENNIFER B 175 KENNEDY DR #17 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDRIDGE 17 KE 17 records were listed P r 0 p L 0 c a t n MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM 05-15-2001, 12:29:44 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 2 SUMMARIES OF 17 RECORDS IN INDEX# 1 COL. FACTOR TYPE SUM MEAN STD.DEV. 1 1 Parcel ID STR 2 2 Owner Name 1 STR 3 4 Owner Addr STR 4 5 City/State STR 5 6 Zip Code STR 6 7 Prop. Locatn STR 0 MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM t 05-15-2001. 12:30:21 South Burlington / Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 1 SELECTION FACTOR(S) FACTOR LOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT CONNECTOR 1 0970-00125RO01 0970-00125RO48 RECORD LISTING P a r c e 0 w n e r N a 0 w n e r 1 m A e d I d D --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 r P r C U i p t Z y i / p L S o t C c a o a t d t e e n 2394 0970-00125R GOULD ANN & MICHAEL R 125 KENNEDY DR #1 GEORGETOWN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 1 KE 2395 0970-00125R PIRO RONALD A 6 PEACHAM LANE ESSEX JCT VT 05452 GEORGETOWN 2 KE 2396 0970-00125R SABOURIN JOANNE M 125 KENNEDY DR #3 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 3 KE 2397 0970-00125R DURHAM RICHARD H 125 KENNEDY DR #4 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 4 KE 2398 0970-00125R BOULERICE LIONEL & PAULINE 5 GEORGETOWN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 5 KE 2399 0970-00125R WATERMAN ANN F 21 PINEHURST OR SHELBURNE VT 05482 GEORGETOWN 6 KE 2400 0970-00125R BARRY JOHN G 7 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 7 KE 2401 0970-00125R DUBUQUE LUKE C & SYLVIA M 8 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 8 KE 2402 0970-00125R FORMAN HAROLD C & RITA M 125 KENNEDY DR UNIT #9 GEORGETOWN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 9 KE 2403 0970-00125R HINDES SYBIL W 125 KENNEDY DR 10 GEORGETOWN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 10 K 2404 0970-00125R KELLEHER KATHLEEN A 11 GEORGETOWN 125 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 11 K 2405 0970-00125R LIDRAL MARTHA ELISE KASTEN 125 KENNEDY DR #12 GEORGETOWN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 12 K 2406 0970-00125R BRUNELLE ROBERT 0 & JANET M 13 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN OR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 13 K 2407 0970-00125R BUTTON GLENN & CYNTHIA B 105 LAKEWOOD PARKWAY BURLINGTON VT 05401 GEORGETOWN 14 K 2408 0970-00125R BUTTON GLENN R & CYNTHIA 8 105 LAKEWOOD PKWY BURLINGTON VT 05401 GEORGETOWN 15 K 2409 0970-00125R POULIN KEITH T & JANE R 16 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 16 K 2410 0970-00125R WRIGHT CAROL R 125 KENNEDY DR #17 GEORGETOWN S BURLINGTON VT 05407 GEOGETOWN 17 KE 2411 0970-00125R LYMAN ROBERT K & MICHELE 151 CUMBERLAND RD BURLINGTON VT 05401 GEORGETOWN 18 K 2412 0970-00125R MORELAND NANCY A 125 KENNEDY DR 19 GEORGETOWN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 19 K 2413 0970-00125R HUSREFOVIC DAMIR & AIDA 125 KENNEDY DR #20 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 20 K 2414 0970-00125R SCHELL CLAIRE M TRUSTEE 23340 WATER CIRCLE BOCA RATON FL 33486 GEORGETOWN 21 K 2415 0970-00125R WRIGHT CAROL R 22 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 22 K 2416 0970-00125R MOYER CYNTHIA 23 GEORGETOWN 125 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 23 K 2417 0970-00125R ENGEL STUART 24 GEORGETOWN 125 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 24 K 2418 0970-00125R GALLIVAN PATRICK J 125 KENNEDY DR #25 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 25 K 2419 0970-00125R RICE MARTIN A & ELAINE M GEORGETOWN #26 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 26 K 2420 0970-00125R FOLEY BANBA A 27 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 27 K 2421 0970-00125R RAMOS HAMILTON & MARLA 28 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 28 K 2422 0970-00125R WARD VIVIAN C TRUSTEE ' 3 HARBOR WATCH ROAD BUS VT 05401 GEORGETOWN 29 K 2423 0970-00125R ECKERSON HOLLY 125 KENNEDY DR UNIT 30 `ION S b, GTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 30 K 2424 0970-00125R ABBOTT NATHAN M TRUSTEE 31 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN OR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 31 K 2425 0970-00125R DANDRIDGE MIRA 32 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 32 K 2426 0970-00125R DANDRIDGE BERNICE H & MIRA B 105 SHARON STREET WEST MEDFORD MA 02155 GEORGETOWN 33 K 2427 0970-00125R SCHEFFERT ROBERT & AUDRA BEAR TRAPP RD UNDERHILL VT 05489 GEORGETOWN 34 K 2428 0970-00125R CROWLEY THOMAS M 35 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN OR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 35 K 2429 0970-00125R MCSWEENEY JOHN R 36 GEORGETOWN US KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 36 K 2430 0970-00125R FISK LUCINDA M 37 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 37 K 2431 0970-00125R DANAHY MARYANN F 38 GEORGETOWN 125 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 38 K 2432 0970-00125R BRODEUR ROBERT P & JOANN B 6 CALO CT ST ALBANS VT 05478 GEORGETOWN 39 K 2433 0970-00125R BADOLATO CONSTANCE A 67 LAUREL HILL DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 40 K 2434 0970-00125R FRUNZI GEORGE & PATRICIA 41 GEORGETOWN 125 KENNEDY DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 41 K 2435 0970-00125R JACQUES JULIA L 125 KENNEDY DR 42 GEORGETOWN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 42 K 2436 0970-00125R CLARK LUCILLE H FILLION ELAINE 43 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 43 K 2437 0970-00125R EDDY WILLIAM DWIGHT 44 GEORGETOWN 125 KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 44 K 2438 0970-00125R WARD RICHARD S & VIVIAN TRUSTE 3 HARBORWATCH ROAD BURLINGTON VT 05401 GEORGETOWN 45 K 2439 0970-00125R MEEHAN M JEAN 79 LAUREL HILL DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 46 K 2440 0970-00125R RUSSELL JOHN A 30 BRIGHAM RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GEORGETOWN 47 K 2441 0970-00125R PERKETT HOWARD R 399 WOODLAND PARK MIDDLEBURY VT 05753 GEORGETOWN 48 K 48 records were listed MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM 05-15-2001, 12:30:23 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 2 SUMMARIES OF 48 RECORDS IN INDEX/ 1 COL. FACTOR TYPE SUM MEAN STD.DEV. 1 1 Parcel ID STR 2 2 Owner Name 1 STR 3 4 Owner Addr STR 4 5 City/State STR 5 6 Zip Code STR 6 7 Prop. Locatn STR O'BRIEN HOME FARM CROSS -STREET PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION parcel 0860-006200001 to Parcel 09700-001500 Parcel 0815-00032 to 0860-006200009 Kennedy Professional Association 0815-OOG60 620 Hinesburg Road Associates 150 Kennedy Drive Winding Brook Subdivision South Burlington, VT 05403 See attached list. See attached list. Parcels 1680-00101 to Parcels 0160-00001 to Parcel 0970-00275 1680-00406 0160-00092 Merchants Bank Sugartree Subdivision Bayberry lane Subdivision P.O. Box 1009 Burlington VT 05402 See attached list. See attached list. Parcel 0980-00020 Parcel 0980-00025 Parcel 1260-002000 Alan D. Palmer Daniel J. & Leo J., Jr. O'Brien Daniel J. & Leo J., Jr. O'Brien 2169 Dorset St. P. O. Box 2184 P. O. Box 2184 Shelburne VT 05482 South Burlington, VT 05407 South Burlington, VT 05407 Parcel 1260-00150 Parcel 1260-00100 Parcel 1260-00080 Daniel J. & Sandra T. O'Brien Stephanie O'Brien Kennaugh Richard & Mary P. Roy P. O. Box 2184 100 Old Farm Road 80 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05407 South Burlington VT 05403 South Burlington VT 05403 Parcel 0573-00016 Parcel 0573-00014 Parcel 0573-00012 Michael J. & Bonnie S. O'Day Kevin J. & Mary R. Ransom Susi E. Taylor 16 Dover St. 14 Dover St. 12 Dover St. South Burlington VT 05403 South Burlington VT 05403 South Burlington VT 05403 Parcel 0573-00010 Parcel 0810-00177 Parcel 0860-00635 Michael D. & Trudy A. Haire Ronald J. & Barbara J. Lascala CPA Partnership 10 Dover St. 177 Hayes Avenue c/o Daniel J. O'Brien South Burlington VT 05403 South Burlington VT 05403 1855 Williston Road South Burlington VT 05403 Parcel 0860-00625 Parcel 0970-00110 Ralph B. & Ann j. Goodrich Cairns CD Irrevocable Trust P.O. Box 2123 Mobil R/E Tax Dept. South Burlington VT 05407 Box 290 Dallas TX 75221 00I82:cross street adjoins MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM 05-15-2001. 12:31:47 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page $ 1 SELECTION FACTOR(S) FACTOR LOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT CONNECTOR 1 1815-OOOOOR 1815-99999R RECORD LISTING P a r c e 0 w n e r N a 0 w n e r 1 m A e d I d D --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 r 4608 1815-00032R WARD CHRISTINE E 4609 1815-00037R COURCY LISA 4612 1815-00044R FAUCHER MARC R & MARGARET A 4613 1815-00048R HORNER HARVEY E & ETHEL M 4614 1815-00053R RILEY BRYAN J & STACY E 4615 1815.00056R REDMOND DAVID A & MARIE C 4616 1815-00057R BLUMENSTEIN HAROLD I & RUTH 4617 1815-00058R DENUNZIO MICHAEL A & KIM M 4618 1815-00059R ALEXANDRIDES MARY A 4619 1815-00061R MARSDEN TERENCE J 4620 1815-00062R EVENSON CLAIRE E 4621 1815-00063R BUKO JOZEF MARIA & TERESKA 4622 1815-00064R BOHLEN PATRICIA J & WILLIAM C 4623 1815-00065R BALDI KEITH J & ANGELA M 4624 1815-00066R STAFFORD JUDITH E 32 WINDING BROOK 37 WINDING BROOK DR 44 WINDING BROOK DR 48 WINDING BROOK DR 53 WINDING BROOK DR 1422 MAIN ST 57 WINDING BROOK DR 58 WINDING BROOK DR 59 WINDING BROOK DR 61 WINDING BROOK DR 62 WINDING BROOK DR 63 WINDING BROOK DR 64 WINDING BROOK DR 65 WINDING BROOK DR 66 WINDING BROOK OR 4625 1815-00067R WALTERS ELIZABETH M 67 WINDING BROOK DR 4626 1815-00068R WITTE CHRISTINA 68 WINDING BROOK DR 4627 1815-00069R CASSANI KARA H69 WINDING BROOK 4628 1815-0007OR BUKO TERESKA J 70 WINDING BROOK DR 4629 1815-00071R BESSETT THELMA L & JAMES L TRU 71 WINDING BROOK DR 4630 1815-00072R HAAS ERNEST J & ELIZABETH L 72 WINDING BROOK OR 4631 1815-00073R HUTCHINS GINA A 73 WINDING BROOK 4632 1815-00074R BOILEAU MELISSA 74 WINDING BROOK DR 4633 1815-00075R GRIMES JEFFREY J & ELLEN B 75 WINDING BROOK DR 4634 1815-00076R WILSON JODIE M 76 WINDING BROOK 4635 1815-00077R LEMBCKE TRUST 47 BITTERSWEET LANE 4636 1815-00078R GEDDES MARGARET 78 WINDING BROOK DR 4637 1815-00079R DOLLARD EDWARD 725 SCOTLAND ST S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT ST JOHNSBURY VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT P r C 0 i p t Z y i / p L S 0 t C c a 0 a t d t e e n 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05819 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK 05403 WINDING BROOK BURLINGTON VT 05401 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK DUNEDIN FL 34698 WINDING BROOK 4638 1815-0008OR SAWYER DEBORAH A ! / 80 WINDING BROOK DR S )NGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4639 1815-00081R MACKENZIE LAWRENCE M & ELIZABL 81 WINDING BROOK OR S BUKLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4640 1815-00082R CARDEN CATHERINE H 82 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4641 1815-00083R DESMOND JEANNE T 83 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4642 1815-00084R RICHER LISE M 84 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4643 1815-000AlR MILLER ROBERT J Al WINDING BROOK KEN OR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4644 1815-00OA2R NADON SALLY JEAN 2 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4645 1815-00OA3R DEACON SUSAN S 3 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4646 1815-00DA4R HAMEYER KLAUS BOX 41 WEST DANVILLE VT 05873 WINDING BROOK 4647 1815-00OA5R RAFTER NORBERT J 5 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4648 1815-00OA6R BOFFA CATHERINE V 6 WINDING BROOK OR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4649 1815-00OA7R CORSKIE JOHN J & THERESA M A7 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4650 1815-00OA8R BERKETT STEPHEN A & LORRAINE P 8 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4651 1815-00OB9R WATSON GEORGE E & RUTH H 9 WINDING BROOK OR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4652 1815-OOBIOR MAHANEY FREDERICK W & JANET B10 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4653 1815-OOBIIR SCHLAK MARION L Bll WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4654 1815-OOB12R GILLIGAN MICHAEL W 12 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4655 1815-OOB13R MIDDLETON GAIL A 13 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4656 1815-OOB14R PRICE WILLIAM W 14 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4657 1815-OOB15R AHEARN ERIN M 15 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4658 1815-OOB16R MURTIE AMARYLLIS G B16 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4659 1815-OOC17R WILSON JEAN P 17 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 5348 1815-OOC18R NADON FRANCES M 18 WINDING BROOK SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05401 WINDING BROOK 4660 1815-OOC19R HILL KATHLEEN J 19 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4661 1815-OOC20R DISANTO KATHERINE C C20 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4662 1815-OOC21R BIRNBAUM GEORGE & MURIEL C 176 COUNTRY CLUB DR FLORIDA NY 10921 WINDING BROOK 4663 1815-OOC22R MOEGELIN MARNE S P 0 BOX 9397 S BURLINGTON VT 05407 WINDING BROOK 4664 1815-OOC23R HURLBURT CAROL M 23 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4665 1815-OOC24R PERRAUDIN GEORGE & EVELYN 24 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4666 1815-OOC25R CANNING JOHN T 25 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4667 1815-OOC26R REDFIELD SCOTT T C26 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4668 1815-OOC27R MCCABE JOHN F & CLAIRE M 27 WINDING BROOK KEN OR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4669 1815-OOC28R STOCKER CAROL A 366 SOUTH COVE RD BURLINGTON VT 05401 WINDING BROOK 4670 1815-OOD29R SANDER DAVID A 29 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4671 1815-OOD30R LEMIEUX GARY L D30 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 3 4672 1815-OOD31R MACHANIC COREY B D31 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 0 4673 1815-OOD33R BURNS PENILEE 33 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4674 1815-OOD34R NOKES JENNIFER J 34 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4675 1815-OOD35R ST GERMAIN MICHEL E D35 WINDING BROOK KEN OR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4676 1815-OOD36R WRIGHT BRENDA 36 WINDING BROOK DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4677 1815-OOE38R BOUCHARD DEBORAH 38 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4610 1815-OOE39R MCGINNISS KATHERINE H 39 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4678 1815-OOE40R BROOKS HEATHER L 40 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4679 1815-OOE41R ALLEGREZZA RICHARD & HANNELORE 336 CLAERWATER RD SHELBURNE VT 05482 WINDING BROOK 4680 1815-OOE42R THIBAULT KATHRYN ANN & VINCENT 97 OAKCREST DR BURLINGTON VT 05401 WINDING BROOK 4611 1815-DOE43R LUCAS THOMAS A E43 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 4681 1815-OOF45R HILL SANDRA W 4682 1815-OOF46R REYES SERGIO J & SUSANA 4683 1815-OOF47R POULOS PATRICIA 4684 1815-OOF49R CLARAHAN SUSAN 4685 1815-OOF50R DUFFY TERESA 4686 1815-DOF51R NICHOLSON JOHN G & MARJORIE 4687 1815-OOF52R PLOOF RICHARD E SR & BARBARA A 4688 1815-OOG54R MCQUADE JOANNE 4689 1815-OGG55R HANSEN JEAN L 4690 1815-ODG60R WOOL MICHAEL W TRUSTEE 84 records were listed 45 WINDING BROOK DR S NGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK F46 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 47 WINDING BROOK DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 49 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK 50 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK F51 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK F52 WINDING BROOK S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK P.O. BOX 9466 S BURLINGTON VT 05407 WINDING BROOK 55 WINDING BROOK KEN DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WINDING BROOK P 0 BOX 721 BURLINGTON VT 05401 WINDING BROOK MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM ) 05-15-2001. 12:31:49 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 2 SUMMARIES OF 84 RECORDS IN INDEX# 1 COL. FACTOR TYPE SUM MEAN STO.DEV. 1 1 Parcel ID STR 2 2 Owner Name 1 STR 3 4 Owner Addr STR 4 5 City/State STR 5 6 Zip Code STR 6 7 Prop. Locatn STR MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM ' 05-15-2001. 12:33:47 I k .1 South Burlington Release: 3/9199 . r 3 Property File: Y0504PO0.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 1 SELECTION FACTOR(S) FACTOR LOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT CONNECTOR 1 0160-OOOOOR 0160-99999R RECORD LISTING 0 w n 0 C P e w i a r n t Z r e y i c N r / p e a S 1 m A t C e d a o I d t d --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D 1 r e e 348 0160-OOOOIR PIERCE NANCY HEALD 1 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 349 0160-00002R MURPHY G MARILYN 24 DUNLOP WAY COLCHESTER VT 05446 BAYBERRY LN 350 0160-00003R DODGE F WILL P 0 BOX 922 WILLISTON VT 05495 BAYBERRY LN 351 0160-00004R POTHIAWALA AMIN & PARVIN 31 WINTER LANE CIRCLE ESSEX JCT VT 05452 BAYBERRY LN 352 0160-00005R KINGSBURY GEORGE & JOAN 5 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 353 0160-00006R COOPER WENDY C H8 GRANDVIEW DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 354 0160-00007R PIERRO MARY A 180 MIDDLE NECK ROAD SANDS POINT NY 11050 BAYBERRY LN 355 0160-00008R HACKEIT JEANETTE M 8 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 356 0160-00009R SAVOIE JEFFREY M JEFFREY W 345 MEADOWRIDGE RD WILLISTON VT 05495 BAYBERRY LN 357 0160-OOOIOR ATWOOD ALAN E 10 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 358 0160-00011R BRUNELLE ALISON C 11 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 359 0160-00012R ANGOLANO ANTHONY D 12 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 360 0160-00013R PROVETTO JAMIE A 13 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 361 0160-00014R GREEN DARRIN 14 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 362 0160-00015R AUBE JESSICA 15 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 363 0160-00016R ROORIGUE ANITA L & VONA B 16 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 364 0160-00017R WALSH ALLAN J 102 STIRUPP CIRCLE WILLISTON VT 05495 BAYBERRY LN 365 0160-OOOIBR PERKINS DOUGLAS B & CHRISTINE 21 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 366 0160-00019R FORTIN ROBERT F & MARGARITE E 19 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 367 0160-0002OR ARMSTRONG ALICE K & SAMUEL J 20 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 368 0160-00021R GEORGE LORRAINE C 21 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 369 0160-00022R GILLIAM LINDA 22 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 370 0160-00023R GEORGES FLORENCE G TRUSTEE 23 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 371 0160-00024R POLEY DIANE P 24 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 372 0160-00025R STEWART DALE 25 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 373 0160-00026R ROSSI-HOWARD FREDRICK J & MARG 26 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 374 0160-00027R MCLAUGHLIN JAMES P & CATHERINE 27 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 375 0160-00028R TUTTLE ANN M 28 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN P r 0 p L 0 c a t n 376 0160-00029R LIPSON DEBRA R ) 65 HIGH RIDGE ROAD #404 Sl p CT 06905 BAYBERRY LN 377 0160-0003OR KING DEBORAH M 30 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 378 0160-00031R LAWRENCE BARRY J 31 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 379 0160-00032R LOYER SANDRA L 34 EAST BIRCH LANE #2 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 380 0160-00033R BARNUM JESSICA A 33 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 381 0160-00034R GINSBURG CHARLES 34 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 382 0160-00035R BARRETT PENNY S 35 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 383 0160-00036R CARGILL GRAY 36 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 384 0160-00037R COOKE RUSSELL T 17 WHITE BIRCH LANE WILLISTON VT 05495 BAYBERRY LN 385 0160-00038R WALCOFF HARRY 161 AUSTIN DR BURLINGTON VT 05401 BAYBERRY LN 386 0160-00039R LAMELL RONALD R JR 82A JERICHO RD ESSEX JCT VT 05452 BAYBERRY LN 387 0160-00040R PRICE LOIS 40 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 388 0160-00041R BEACH GI GI 41 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 389 0160-00042R SHKURKO EUGENE I 42 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 390 0160-00043R TITUS RALPH T BOX 113 SHELBURNE VT 05482 BAYBERRY LN 391 0160-00044R SHORTSLEEVES ELLA M 44 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 392 0160-00045R ADORISIO MARGARET D 45 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 393 0160-00046R GIFFORD CHARLES E 46 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 394 0160-00047R WALCOFF HARRY 161 AUSTIN DR #41 BURLINGTON VT 05401 BAYBERRY LN 395 0160-00048R BROCK FRANCES D 48 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 396 0160-00049R MORRIS JEANETTE T TRUSTEE E8 STONEHEDGE OR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 397 0160-0005OR WISEHART KAREN 50 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 398 0160-00051R BRADY GAYLE S 6243 SPEAR ST CHARLOTTE VT 05445 BAYBERRY LN 399 0160-00052R BENNETT MARY L 52 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 400 0160-00053R VAIL BURR & LINDA 53 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 401 0160-00054R MCKEE JAMES E 54 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 402 0160-00055R REED MARK 55 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 403 0160-00056R CECERE DONALD F & LORRAINE B 56 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 404 0160-00057R GORDON JAMES D 57 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 405 0160-00058R PENOYER PATRICIA A 58 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 406 0160-00059R BARRETT BRETT 374 PATCHEN RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 407 0160-0006OR TSAI FAMILY TRUST 120 TARBOX RD JERICHO VT 05465 BAYBERRY LN 408 0160-00061R KOENIG ANNELIESE K 61 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 409 0160-00062R BENOIT MARY E 62 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 410 0160-00063R YOUNG ADAM 63 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 411 0160-00064R SHORTSLEEVES PENNY 64 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 412 0160-00065R O'BRIEN PATRICK A & BETSY A 65 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 413 0160-00066R REINECKE RUDOLPH S & DELORES P 0 BOX 156 MONTPELIER VT 05601 BAYBERRY LN 414 0160-00067R PUGH ANN D 67 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 415 0160-00068R GUILLETTE MURIEL F 68 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 416 0160-00069R DOUGLAS BONNIE F 69 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 417 0160-0007OR BRADY ROSEMARY 8 70 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 418 0160-00071R HEURTEMATTE DOUGLAS E 71 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 419 0160-00072R HUFF JOYCE 72 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 420 0160-00073R DELEON SUSAN P 73 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 421 0160-00074R DRURY FRANK R 74 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM ) 05-15-2001, 12:33:50 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 2 SUMMARIES OF 92 RECORDS IN INDEX# 1 COL. FACTOR TYPE SUM MEAN STD.DEV. 1 1 Parcel ID STR 2 2 Owner Name 1 STR 3 4 Owner Addr STR 4 5 City/State STR 5 6 Zip Code STR 6 7 Prop. Locatn STR 0 422 0160-00075R SHELTRA MARLOWE 75 BAYBERRY LANE S )NGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 423 0160-00076R GOUIN CHRISTOPHER M 76 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 424 0160-00077R BOHEN LAWRENCE F & SALLY J 3325 HINESBURG RD RICHMOND VT 05477 BAYBERRY LN 425 0160-00078R POPE LYNNIA M & KURT W 78 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 426 0160-00079R ROUILLE SYLVIA J 79 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 427 0160-0008OR HILL CHARLES N & YON HUI 80 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 428 0160-00081R ALLEN ARCHIBALD J & ELIZABETH P 0 BOX 3009 BURLINGTON VT 05401 BAYBERRY LN 429 0160-00082R WALKER DOUGLAS L & DAWN P 82 BAYBERRY LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 430 0160-00083R CAMPER WAYNE G & PATRICIA ANN 83 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 431 0160-00084R JACOBS SANDRA E 528 4TH ST ENCINITAS CA 92024 BAYBERRY LN 432 0160-00085R BENNETT RUTH W 85 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 433 0160-00086R NOWAKOWSKI JASON P 86 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 434 0160-00087R MORSE DANIEL P 25 IRVING TERR APT 17 CAMBRIDGE MA 02138 BAYBERRY LN 435 0160-00088R DESARNO MARK T 88 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 436 0160-00089R PERRY LORRAINE E 89 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 437 0160-0009OR THABAULT PAUL L 4 MT VIEW COURT BURLINGTON VT 05401 BAYBERRY LN 438 0160-00091R RYAN JOANNE E 54 DUFFY RD MILTON VT 05468 BAYBERRY LN 439 0160-00092R JONES BRYANT D 92 BAYBERRY LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAYBERRY LN 92 records were listed MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM 05-15-2001. 12:37:25 r J, South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 1 y SELECTION FACTOR(S) FACTOR LOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT CONNECTOR 1 1680-OOOOOR 1680-99999R RECORD LISTING 0 w n 0 C P e w i a r n t Z r e y i c N r / p e a S 1 m A t C e d a o I d t d --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D i r e e 4126 1680-00101R TAYLOR DANIEL M 101 SUGARTREE LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4127 1680-00102R ZANG DANIEL J 102 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4128 1680-00103R TOOF PAMELA S 103 SUGAR TREE LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4129 1680-00104R BUGBEE JESSE D & DAWN D 8 SOUTH BAY CIRCLE COLCHESTER VT 05446 SUGAR TREE LN 4130 1680-00105R GLAZER HARRIET 105 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4131 1680-00106R KOWALEWITZ LOUISE A 106 SUGAR TREE LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4132 1680-00107R PEET FREDERICK V 1 EXECUTIVE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4133 1680-00108R BEECHER BETSY A 108 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4134 1680-00201R HOLM-HANSEN AUDREY M 201 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4135 1680-00202R PEET FREDERICK W 1 EXECUTIVE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4136 1680-00203R LYON TRICIA A 203 SUGAR TREE LN S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4137 1680-00204R LAJUDICE PETER T 765 CHAPIN RD ESSEX JCT VT 05452 SUGAR TREE LN 4138 1680-00205R HOPKINS RUTH A 205 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4139 1680-00206R THIBAULT EDWARD 206 SUGARTREE LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGARTREE LN 4140 1680-00207R BOWEN FREDERICK C 1265 GREAT PLAIN AVE NEEDHAM MA 02192 SUGAR TREE LN 4141 1680-00208R CARMINATI JEAN M 208 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4142 1680-00209R METZ JOSEPH L 209 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4143 1680-0021OR DOBSON MARK C & CHRISTINE L 210 SUGAR TREE LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4144 1680-00301R YAGER CINDY 301 SUGAR TREE LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4145 1680-00302R PEET FREDERICK V 1 EXECUTIVE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4146 1680-00303R AUSTIN MARK D 303 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4147 1680-00304R OTTE PAMELA J 304 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4148 1680-00305R WITTER DEBORAH J 305 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4149 1680-00306R PEET FREDERICK V 306 SUGARTREE LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4150 1680-00307R BECKWITH EILEEN N 307 SUGARTREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4151 1680-00308R PFISTER WARREN W & KAREN H 21704 BRINK MEADOW LANE GERMANTOWN MD 20876 SUGAR TREE LN 4152 1680-00309R THOMPSON JEFF & CORINNE 309 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4153 1680-0031OR CROW THOMAS C & DEBORAH M 95 CHANDLER FARM RD STOWE VT 05672 SUGAR TREE LN P r 0 p L 0 c a t n 4154 1680-00401R STANDISH BRUCE J 401 SUGAR TREE LA S iNGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4155 1680-00402R PORTER VERA R 402 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4156 1680-00403R RUSH PATRICIA A. 403 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4157 1680-00404R MONTGOMERY JOSEPH ROSS P 0 BOX 307 JERICHO VT 05465 SUGAR TREE LN 4158 1680-00405R HURLEY NANCY J 405 SUGAR TREE LA S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 4159 1680-00406R GRAHAM JEAN E 406 SUGARTREE LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUGAR TREE LN 34 records were listed MiCROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM 05-15-2001. 12:37:26 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 2 SUMMARIES OF 34 RECORDS IN INDEX# 1 COL. FACTOR TYPE SUM MEAN STD.DEV. 1 1 Parcel ID STR 2 2 Owner Name 1 STR 3 4 Owner Addr STR 4 5 City/State STR 5 6 Zip Code STR 6 7 Prop. Locatn STR MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM ) 05-15-2001. 12:34:40 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 1 Lit SELECTION FACTOR(S) FACTOR LOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT CONNECTOR 1 0790-OOOGOR 0790-99999R RECORD LISTING 0 w n 0 C P e w i a r n t r e y c N r / e a S 1 m A t e d a I d t D --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 r e 1794 0790-00001R JEROME BARBARA J 1 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 1795 0790-00002R COOLIDGE CHRISTOPHER R 2 HAWTHORN CIRCLE 1796 0790-00003R LEFEBVRE GERMAINE V 3 HAWTHORN CIR 1797 0790-00004R HOPKINS HEATH MICHAEL 4 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 1798 0790-00005R BAYNHAM WILLIAM P & MILDRED F 5 INDIAN HILL RD 1799 0790-00006R BARBER SARA A 6 HAWTHORN CIR 1800 0790-00007R GLITMAN MATTHEW M P 0 BOX 438 1801 0790-OOOOBR DELLER ANNA J 8 HAWTHORN CIR 1802 0790-00009R WERPY ROGER A 9 HAWTHORN CIR 1803 0790-0001OR SULLIVAN EUGENA L REVOCABLE TR 10 HAWTHORN CIR 1804 0790-00011R MARTIN GARY R 1805 0790-00012R SCHEGERIN BARBARA M 1806 0790-00013R COOKE ALAN G & HILDEGARD A 1807 0790-00014R MINER RALPH R & JUTTA 1808 0790-00015R BAILEY LAURENA M 1809 0790-00016R BERGERON PAUL H 1810 0790-00017R FRENCH GLORIA F 1811 0790-00018R SANSONE KELLY K 1812 0790-00019R PEIRCE MICHAEL D 1813 0790-0002OR SMITH TODD C & PATRICIA A 1814 0790-00021R PERKINS ALVERTA L 1815 0790-00022R BERNSTEIN KERRY & DENISE L 1816 0790-00023R ANTONIOLI DAVID A 1817 0790-00024R MARTIN JAMES EDWARD 1818 0790-00025R DREWNIAK FRANK P P.D. BOX 307 P 0 BOX 21 25 MCINTOSH AVE 14 HAWTHORN CIR 15 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 16 HAWTHORN CIR 17 HAWTHORN CIR 20 CASCADE COURT 19 HAWTHORN CIRCLE 20 HAWTHORN CIR 21 HAWTHORN CIR 32 SAM WARD RD 23 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 24 HAWTHORN CIR 25 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT WESTPORT CT S BURLINGTON VT JEFFERSONVILLE VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT JONESVILLE VT ST ALBANS VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT ESSEX JCT VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT UNDERHILL VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT S BURLINGTON VT 1819 0790-00026R DALEY KAREN L 26 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 1820 0790-00027R WARNER DAVID B 5 SILVER BOW TERRACE ESSEX JCT VT 1821 0790-00028R HWANG PAUL B & PAULA C 1399 BAY RIDGE CT SAN JOSE CA P r 0 p 2 i p L 0 C c 0 a d t e n 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORNE CIRCL 06880 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05464 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05466 HAWTHORN CIR 05481 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05452 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05489 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 05403 HAWTHONR CIR 05452 HAWTHORN CIR 95120 HAWTHORN CIR 1822 0790-00029R BROWN TIMOTHY M ' 12 DOGGETT'S COAT PLACE Si )A SPRINGS NY, 12866 HAWTHORN CIR 1823 0790-0003OR ORLEANS WILLIAM A 84 CENTRAL AVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1824 0790-00031R BILODEAU RICHARD T P 0 BOX 1152 NEWPORT VT 05855 HAWTHORN CIR 1825 0790-00032R FARRINGTON DAVID C 4788 SPEAR ST SHELBURNE VT 05482 HAWTHORN CIR 1826 0790-00033R HANDY EARL A 33 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1827 0790-00034R WINTER BENJAMIN H 34 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1828 0790-00035R MULLIN KAREN 1073A HARDSCRABBLE RD BRISTOL VT 05443 HAWTHORN CIR 1829 0790-00036R DEERING CORINNE M 36 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1830 0790-00037R HARDY ROBERT A & VIRGINIA L 37 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1831 0790-00038R GENZLINGER ROBERT BARRY & MAUR 80 BLACK LANTERN LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1832 0790-00039R COOKE RUSSELL T 147 WHITE BIRCH LANE WILLISTON VT 05495 HAWTHORN CIR 1833 0790-0004OR RICKER HOLLIS A 40 HAWTHORN CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1834 0790-00041R SIMONEAU LOUIS A 41 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1835 0790-00042R MCKAY ROBERT & JANICE 72 CANNONBALL RD WANAQUE NJ 07465 HAWTHORN CIR 1836 0790-00043R MCGRATH SEAN P 3 BUTLER DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1837 0790-00044R SHERIDAN PATRICIA A 21 CAVENDISH COVE S HERO VT 05486 HAWTHORN CIR 1838 0790-00045R PEABODY ELIZABETH 45 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1839 0790-00046R JASANY RICHARD A 46 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1840 0790-00047R BOWLES JOHN M & SUSAN E 47 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1841 0790-00048R MIERSE WILLIAM E 48 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1842 0790-00049R RISING JOAN M 49 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1843 0790-0005OR PIERCE POLLY A 50 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1844 0790-00051R LESKO ANDREW JR & GAIL A 51 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1845 0790-00052R ROOP SUSAN H 17 MT VIEW ST MONTPELIER VT 05602 HAWTHORN CIR 1846 0790-00053R STRAW ANNE E 53 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1847 0790-00054R GRISE GARY D & KATHY L 101 CLAY POINT RD COLCHESTER VT 05446 HAWTHORN CIR 1848 0790-00055R WOLBACH MARY L 18 EAST TERRACE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1849 0790-00056R MICHNIEWICZ STEVEN J & MARY E 56 HAWTHORN CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1850 0790-00057R GORDON WILLIAM & CHRYSTAL L 57 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1851 0790-00058R MILLER MARK L 58 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1852 0790-00059R VIGNE LITTA J 59 HAWTHORN CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1853 0790-0006OR GRANGER NORMAN EDWARD 60 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN 1854 0790-00061R WANG ZHONG 0 & XIAN H 61 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 5708 0790-00062R LYNCH DEBORAH 62 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 62 HAWTHORNE Cl 1856 0790-00063R LACHANCE LOUISE L 63 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1857 0790-00064R BURKE CATHERINE M 64 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1858 0790-00065R HURD KENNETH J 685 BEECHER HILL RD HINESBURG VT 05461 HAWTHORN CIR 1859 0790-00066R ARAGONA MICHELLE S 66 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1860 0790-00067R TITUS RALPH T & PATRICIA A BOX 113 SHELBURNE VT 05482 HAWTHORN CIR 1861 0790-00068R HURLBURT RICHARD C 68 HAWTHORN CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1862 0790-00069R ORLEANS WILLIAM A 84 CENTRAL AVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1863 0790-0007OR HANBRIDGE BRIAN 70 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1864 0790-00071R LISCIO JOHN & JANET S 71 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1865 0790-00072R PAGE GARY L & KRISTEN L 72 HAWTHORN CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1866 0790-00073R HELM K JENNIFER P 0 BOX 6 JEFFERSONVILLE VT 05464 HAWTHORN CIR 1867 0790-00074R CAMPBELL OLGA C 74 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1868 0790-00075R GODARD ALISON C ) 75 HAWTHORN CIR S )NGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1869 0790-00076R SMITH COLIN A 76 HAWTHORN CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1870 0790-00077R HAMMOND MILTON A & NANCY S 77 HAWTHORN CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1871 0790-00078R NOLL CHRISTIAN 78 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1872 0790-00079R CALLEA CAROL A 79 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1873 0790-0008OR SPRAGUE ANNE W 29 BAYBERRY LANE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1874 0790-00081R FISKE LEE C JR & PATRICIA A 58 PROCTOR AVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORNE CIR 8 1875 0790-00082R PIERRO MARY A 180 MIDDLE NECK ROAD SANDS POINT NY 11050 HAWTHORN CIR 1876 0790-00083R WILBER RICHARD M 83 HAWTHORNE CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1877 0790-00084R GAMSBY CAROL A 84 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1878 0790-00085R DINSMORE DAVID P & DEBORAH J 102 MAECK FARM RD SHELBURNE VT 05482 HAWTHORN CIR 1879 0790-00086R TAYLOR SUSAN A 86 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1880 0790-00087R CONDER DANIEL N & PATSY M 4201 EAST BAKERSFIELD ENOSBURG FALLS VT 05450 HAWTHORN CIR 1881 0790-00088R POIRIER BARBARA M 88 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1882 0790-00089R HATCH CARLOTTE H 91 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1883 0790-0009OR DEMAG LINDA M 90 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S;BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1884 0790-00091R WONG BRIAN C 27 QUAIL COURT HAMBURG NJ 07419 HAWTHORN CIR 1885 0790-00092R CHARBONNEAU SCOTT C 92 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORNE CIR 1886 0790-00093R GOLDBERG AARON J TRUSTEE KINGS 233 PEARL ST BURLINGTON VT 05401 HAWTHORN CIR 1887 0790-00094R POWERS PATRICIA TRUSTEE 94 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1888 0790-00095R STEVENS ANDREW B 95 HAWTHORN CIR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 1889 0790-00096R GRUVER ALYSSA 96 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 HAWTHORN CIR 96 96 records were listed 11 MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM ' 05-15-2001. 12:34:43 South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 Property File: Y0504P00.600 South Burlington Residential Report Page # 2 SUMMARIES OF 96 RECORDS IN INDEX# 1 COL. FACTOR TYPE SUM MEAN STD.DEV. 1 1 Parcel ID STR 2 2 Owner Name 1 STR 3 4 Owner Addr STR 4 5 City/State STR 5 6 Zip Code STR 6 7 Prop. Locatn STR MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM 05-15-2001, 12:40:36 EZa`.. I.% South Burlington Release: 3/9/99 ,'t ' i ; .: , !. `i a Property File: Y0204P00.600 South Burlington Commercial Report Page # 1 SELECTION FACTOR(S) FACTOR LOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT CONNECTOR 1 0860-006200001 0860-006200009 RECORD LISTING 0 w T n C o P e i t a r t a r A y A 1 c N d / c e a d S r V 1 m r t e a e e a 2 a 1 I s t i 9 u ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D 1 s e p e e 190 0860-006200001 H A M PROPERTIE 120 LEDGE RD BURLINGTON 05401 0.16 279100.00 620 HINESBURG ROAD 191 0860-006200002 FLEISCHER & JAC 620 HINESBURG R S BURLINGT 05403 0.16 144100.00 620 HINESBURG ROAD 192 0860-006200003 FLEISCHER JACOB 620 HINESBURG R S BURLINGT 05403 0.16 123600.00 620 HINESBURG ROAD 193 0860-006200004 J & S HOLDINGS 620 HINESBURG R S BURLINGT 05403 0.16 114100.00 HINESBURG RD 620 UNIT3D 194 0860-006200005 VERMONT RADIOLO 620 HINESBURG R S BURLINGT 05403 0.16 324600.00 HINESBURG RD 620 UNIT 2B 195 0860-006200006 VERMONT RADIOLO 620 HINESBURG R S BURLINGT 05403 0.16 243400.00 620 HINESBURG RD UNIT#1A 196 0860-006200007 VERMONT RADIOLO 620 HINESBURG R S BURLINGT 05403 0.16 126400.00 620 HINESBURG RD #2A-1 197 0860-006200008 VERMONT RADIOLO UNIT 2A KENNEDY S BURLINGT 05403 0.16 122700.00 620 HINESBURG RD UNIT#2A 198 0860-006200009 H A M PROPERTIE 120 LEDGE RD BURLINGTON 05401 0.16 193700.00 620 HINESBURG ROAD 9 records were listed P r 0 P L 0 c a t n MICROSOLVE CAMA SYSTEM South Burlington Property File: Y0204P00.600 South Burlington Commercial SUMMARIES OF 9 RECORDS IN INDEX$ 1 COL. FACTOR TYPE SUM t 05-15-2001. 12:40:36 Release: 3/9/99 Report Page # 2 MEAN 1 1 Parcel ID STR 2 3 Owner Name 1 STR 3 5 Address STR 4 6 City/State STR 5 7 Zip STR 6 111 Acreage NUM 1.440 0.160 7 138 Total Value NUM 1.671.700.000 185.744.438 8 2 Prop Locatn STR STD.DEV. 0.000 78.747.250 OBRIEN BROTHER S R E A L E S T A T E DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT Narrative for Planned Unit Development of Lots 1 and 2 of The O'Brien Home Farm Development South Burlington, Vermont The O'Brien Home Farm Development is proposed as a Planned Unit Development. The land in the area of the development is zoned Residential District (7). Planned Unit Development is a permitted use in this zoning district. Lot 1 of the Home Farm Development includes 45 townhouse units on a 8.5 acre lot and Lot 2 includes 56 multi -family units on a 5.3 acre lot. Lot 3 is a .5 acre park with improvements to be dedicated to the City of South Burlington. Lot 4 is a 1.9 acre unimproved park to be dedicated to the City of South Burlington. There will also be approximately 2.8 acres dedicated to the City of South Burlington that will be improved to contain a paved road, curbs, bike path, drainage, water and sewer lines and street trees. The Home Farm Development has been designed to efficiently utilize the land, and is in general conformance with the following standards of Section 26.15 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Al) The multi -families will be designed to have two bedroom units, and the townhouses will be designed to have up to three bedroom units. The State of Vermont indicates the design water and sewer flow for a three -bedroom unit is 450 gal/day/unit and 300 gpd for a two -bedroom unit. Water saving devices allow the design flow to be reduced 10% to 405 gal/day/unit. Measurement of actual flows for three bedroom units indicate water and sewage flows of approximately 230 gal/unit/day and approximately 150 gal/unit/day for the two bedroom units. There are a total of 45 townhouse and 56 multi -family units. The design flow for these units would be 40,905 gallons per day. The sewer flow will likely average 18,750 to 20,000 gallons per day at full buildout. Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers met with the South Burlington City Engineer to discuss the capacity of the City sewage collection system. It was our understanding that the City has adequate capacity to treat the daily sewage flow but, there was concern that the sewage collection lines in the vicinity of Kennedy Drive and. Hinesburg Drive might be close to capacity. 1855 Williston Road • P.O. Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 • (802) 658-5000 • fax 658-5002 e-mail: OBriinBros@aol.com Krebs and Lansing and Heindel and Noyes installed equipment to continuously monitor the sewer line flow at the intersection of Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive for a period of eight days. We made the following observations, and have submitted them to the City Engineer, Bill Szymanski, for his review. 1. The sewer pipe crossing Kennedy Drive has a 10" diameter, City records indicate an 8" diameter pipe. 2. The pipe flow rates range from approximately 9 gpm at night to 500 to 600 gpm flow rates during peak flow times. 3. The maximum flow rate recorded was 900 gpm (likely from simultaneous pump station discharges from adjacent developments). 4. Approximately 90% of the time the pipe carries less than 20% of its capacity and the pipe is carrying approximately 50% of its capacity during peak flow times. Based on a 16-hour day, the average flow from the O'Brien Home Farm Development is projected to be 21 gallons per minute. Using a peaking factor of 5, the peak flow rate is projected to be 105 gpm. Based on our continuous flow observations of the sewer collection pipe crossing Kennedy Drive, we estimate the pipe could flow at least 1200 gal/minute. The existing peak flows measure 500 to 600 gpm. Given this information, we feel the sewage flow from the O'Brien Home Farm Development will not have undue adverse affects on the South Burlington sewage collection infrastructure. (See results of continuous monitoring included as Attachment 1.) A2) The area of our project is not located in a flood plain. A3) A stormwater runoff analysis was performed on the proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm. The site was analyzed from Kimball Avenue on the north, Old Farm Road to the east, Hinesburg Road to the south and the condominium developments to the north. The site was analyzed utilizing the SCS TR55 stormwater model and Haestad Method Pond Pac version 7 for the 24-hour, 25-year pre development and post development conditions. The site was analyzed as 5 sub watersheds. With the use of stormwater treatment and retention structures, the following results were obtained for the 24 hour, 25 year storm event. Watershed Pre -Development Peak Runoff (cfs) 1 1.0 2 3.3 3 4.4 4 2.4 5 5.8 Total Pre -Development Runoff 169cfs Post Development Peak Runoff (cfs) 1.0 3.3 4.2 1.4 3.8 13.7cfs Total Post - Development Runoff Detention basins have been designed utilizing Vermont Best Management Practices for Treatment of Stormwater Runoff. The basins will collect and hold the first inch of 2 runoff for 24 hours. The basins will have provisions for them to remain wet utilizing sumps for polishing of stormwater. The development has been designed to provide treatment of stormwater runoff from much of the roads and parking via sheet flow over vegetated terrain. The downslope portions of the site will be banked by vegetated buffers and the 50-foot wide wetland buffers will not be disturbed. The construction plans for the project include temporary erosion control measures such as hay bale and silt fence barriers, stabilized construction entrance, re-establishing vegetation in disturbed areas as soon as possible, avoidance of wetlands and wetland buffers and ongoing inspection and maintenance of erosion control measures. (See Attachment 2 stormwater analysis and plans.) A4) We believe the proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm has been designed in conformance with all local and State regulations. B) The O'Brien Home Farm Development will require water for domestic use and fire flows. Based on a 16-hour delivery day, the average day demand for 45 townhouses and 56 multi -family units is estimated to be 35± gallons per minute. Using a peaking factor of 5, the peak flow rate is estimated to be 175f gpm. A desirable fire flow is estimated to be 1500 to 2000 gpm. South Burlington is fortunate to be well supplied by water from Champlain Water District. We are enclosing as Attachment 3, the results of hydrant flow testing in the area of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road which indicate the water system is capable of delivering 2500 to 3000 gpm flows to the area of the O'Brien Home Farm Development. See attached fire flow results. The proposed water line extension to serve the O'Brien Home Farm Development will provide an additional loop of the Kennedy Drive -Hinesburg Road water system which will reduce friction loss and serve to strengthen the already substantial water distribution system. C) The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm has been designed to control and direct stormwater runoff into detention basins that will treat and release the runoff at rates equal to or lower than pre -development stormwater runoff levels. The development will preserve all of the wetlands and their buffers shown on the site plan, and will provide a vegetated buffer strip on the down slope sides. Temporary erosion control measures will be established and maintained during construction. Permanent erosion control measures include establishing permanent vegetation, paving roads and parking lots and maintaining stormwater collection and treatment facilities. D) See Attachment 4, traffic report prepared by Roger Dickinson, P.E., Lamoureux Dickinson Consulting Engineers. E) See Attachment 5, letter from the South Burlington School District. F) We feel the proposed development of the proposed O'Brien Home Farm Development will not cause an unreasonable burden on the City of South Burlington to provide municipal or governmental services and facilities. The site is located close to the core of the City in an area designated for high -density development. The circulation roads serving the townhouse and multi -family units have been proposed as private roads minimizing municipal road maintenance on the site. The road to be dedicated to the City will be constructed to City standards; every effort will be made to minimize future maintenance costs to the City associated with this segment of road. The buildings and site will be designed to conform to all fire codes. The water system will provide adequate hydrants and the circulation road within the development will provide adequate circulation for emergency vehicles. The Applicant will submit the proposed design to the fire department for review and comments. The Applicant believes the project can be designed to restrict the risk of fighting fires or performing emergency rescue to acceptable levels. The site is located in close proximity to the core of the City in areas already patrolled by the South Burlington Police Department. Roads and road intersections will be designed in conformance with State and local regulations. The use of bus services to commute from the site is feasible and will contribute to less congestion. The design of bikeways and pedestrian connections will help to promote safe pedestrian circulation. The compact nature of the development will make routine police patrols quicker and easier. G) A design goal of ours has been to avoid important natural resources. Before any design work proceeded, the site was evaluated for wetlands, rare and endangered species, wildlife habitats and special features. See letter from Errol Briggs, Biologist (Attachment 6). The results of the evaluation indicated wetlands, and a small intermittent stream associated with a wetland, were important features. The design study employed was to identify a 50 foot wide buffer around the wetlands and stream. and to leave the features and their buffers undisturbed (see site plans). H) The required landscape budget based on the south Burlington ordinance is $74,660.00. The plans indicate value exceeding this amount. The retention of vegetation in the natural open space areas will contribute additional value to the landscaping. Plants were chosen that are salt tolerant and disease resistant. No invasive plants are specified and plant material native to Vermont make up a large percent of the specified plants. Street trees are specified at 2" rather than 2.5" because of commercial availability but because of 35' spacing rather than the 60' spacing as req�-fired for subdivision streets, the cost and the aesthetics benefits will be greater (there are 77 street trees, 66 are required). Planned street trees are in a "greenbelt of 7 to 8 feet between the bike path and the curb and all tree pits will be three times the root ball. The linden tree has been proven to be reliably salt tolerant and they are spaced to accommodate street light spacing requirements. Grading has been held back along the north lot line adjacent to the Wellesley Grove Townhouses to retain as much of the existing vegetation as possible. Supplemental planting is proposed in this area to insure privacy of neighbors. The private side of the units adjacent to Hinesburg Road has been Heavily screened with the lower half of the units and afford relief from the deciduous trees. Sixteen feet trees will screen western sun. The apartment area is surrounded by existing vegetation to remain. Plantings are predominately shade trees to bring down the scale of the two and three story buildings and to provide amenity for the residents. Many flowering trees are introduced in the newly cleared open spaces formed by the buildings. We have employed the University of Vermont Archaeology Consulting program to perform a Phase 1 Archaeological Assessment of the site. The site plans show areas which have been identified as potentially sensitive. Unusual Spring weather conditions have delayed the Phase 1 investigation. If the Phase 1 investigation identifies a site, the design strategy will be to avoid it. If avoidance is not possible, the University of Vermont Archaeological Assessment Team will be employed to recover the artifact(s). I) This proposed project provides a diversity of open space and recreational opportunities. The open spaces consist of two separate but very similar forested natural areas that have intermittent streams and wetland. Both of these areas would provide a natural area recreation experience in a wooded setting in the middle of this densely populated area. The first open area would be sandwiched between Georgetown, Wellesley Grove and the Townhouse unit that we are proposing. This area is approximately 1.5 acres in size and would be owned by the homeowners association of the townhouse area. No development other than fencing next to Wesley Grove (at their request) is proposed. The second open area is between the apartment buildings and Windridge. This area is approximately 1.9 acres in size. We are proposing to donate this area to the City to be used as a low intensity mini park. Preliminary discussions with the Recreation Path Committee seemed to support a meandering unimproved footpath with intermittent sitting benches. The walking path would connect to the bike path. A second mini -park is also being proposed in front of the Townhouses along Hayes Avenue Extension. This park's main objective is to serve as a tot -lot, and associated play items such as saddle mates, as well as several benches for sitting/watching. This mini - park is adjacent to the proposed bike path, which will provide access t this new as well as the existing neighborhoods. J) The O'Brien Home Farm Development will provide a local street with a bike path, street trees, curbs and infrastructure constructed to South Burlington road standards connecting Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive. The street is partially located in a corridor identified by the City as a future street. The Applicant is working in conjunction with the State of Vermont's engineering consultant, McFarland Johnson, to design a safe and efficient entrance to Kennedy Drive from the development. The local street is proposed as an extension of Hayes Avenue to the south and will serve an important function to connect the pedestrian circulation between the existing developments on the south and east sides of Kennedy and Hinesburg Drives. K) The proposed extension of Hayes Avenue loops through land owned by the Applicants. Should there be consideration of future development by adjoining property owners or the City of south Burlington, provisions have been made to accommodate water services and stormwater services and a road profile not exceeding 10% can be provided. The Town Plan identifies a local street link from Hinesburg Road to Old Farm Road as desirable. The proposed extension of Hayes Avenue can accommodate that extension. L) Compliance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan The Applicants feel the proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm is in conformance with the following sections of the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan: Chapter III Comprehensive Plan Goals The proposed development will advance the goals of the open space preservation, protection of wetlands, provide public landscaping, and provide outdoor recreational facilities. The proposed development is located in an area which has been zoned for high -density residential use. The proposed development will be in an area already being used for compact urban development. The layout of the proposed development allows for compact urban densities while providing open space to protect adjacent wetlands and wetland buffers as well as provide land for public recreational use. The multi -family units and the townhouse units will provide quality housing which will be more efficient and use less land than single family housing. The proposed development will be located on or in close proximity to an existing Chittenden County Transportation Agency bus route which will encourage the use of cost effective, environmentally sound transportation to commute the work, shop or recreational activities. The proposed development will serve to extend a local street, a bikeway and water & sewer infrastructure into an area designated by the comprehensive plan as desirable for compact urban residential. development. The development will also provide public recreational spaces, landscaping, protect open space, and is in general conformance with the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of South Burlington. Chapter IV Population The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm would result in the addition of 101 living units. From start to finish, the estimated time to complete the project would be 2.5 to 3.5 years. The estimated occupancy per unit is 2.3 persons. On a three-year buildout, this would result in a 97-person increase in the population in one year's time. This would represent slightly less than a .5% yearly growth in the South Burlington population. The comprehensive plan's stated objective is to limit population growth to 1.5% per year to promote a vital and healthy community. Chapter V Land Use The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm is in an area shown on Map 6 of the future land use plan to be high density residential use. The proposed development utilizes an average density of seven units per acre and is consistent with the plan's future land use pattern generally consisting of a higher density, compact urban core. 6 Chapter VI Housing This proposed development will offer housing opportunities for people of various income levels, age, household size, and mobility. The proposed development provides a close to equal mix of rental (54) vs. owner occupied (45) units. Each area will also provide a variety of housing types. The rental units will consist of four 8-plex's with detached garages and two 12-plex's with underground garages. The owner occupied units will be of the townhouse style and the existing grade of the site will allow three different elevation types to be built. Those types will include a walkout basement, a slab on grade or a basement garage with living levels above. Most units will also have options that include: a third bedroom, a den, an office for home occupation, a finished basement, and a two -car garage. Chapter IX Natural Resources Areas of wetlands have been identified on the O'Brien Home Farm. The wetlands and their buffers were identified before any design of the O'Brien Home Farm commenced. The proposed development avoids the wetlands and their buffers. This design study is consistent with the comprehensive statement that ... special care needs to be taken so that the remaining wetlands are carefully protected.... The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm will include stormwater retention and treatment basins to treat stormwater using best management practices recommended by the State of Vermont before discharging stormwater into the watershed. In addition, vegetative buffers will be maintained along the downslope side of the development and temporary and permanent erosion control measures will be employed during construction of the development. Chapter X Recreation The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm will provide the public with a tot lot mini park and a passive recreation mini park. The development will also provide a public bikeway from Kennedy Drive to Hinesburg Road and access easements for the mini park. These facilities are consistent with the comprehensive plan's goal... to provide for varied recreational needs and interests of its citizens by providing areas and facilities for passive recreation, active sports, cultural and educational programs... Chapter XI Path System The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm will provide a pedestrianibicycle trail connecting Kennedy Drive to Hinesburg Road along the corridor defined on Map 2 of the comprehensive plan. Chapter XII Transportation The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm is adjacent to an existing Chittenden County Transportation Authority bus route. The project plans include bus stops along the proposed expansion of Hayes Avenue. The close proximity of the development to the City core will encourage residents of the development to use the bus to commute to work, shopping and recreation. The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm will include a bicycle/pedestrian corridor from Kennedy Drive to Hinesburg Road, helping to enhance a more pedestrian friendly environment for residents of the Home Farm and surrounding developments. The proposed development of the O'Brien Home Farm proposes the construction of a local road. This road will be designed for low speed use, and is proposed as the northeasterly extension of Hayes Avenue. The proposed road has been designed to allow a connection to Old Farm Road as shown by Map 3 of the South Burlington comprehensive plan. Chapter XVI Energy Conservation The units proposed for the O'Brien Home Farm will be designed and constructed utilizing guidelines and recommendations from Energy Rated Homes of Vermont. The compact nature of the proposed development compared to a single family house development will create significant energy savings by lowering the surface are of roofs and walls exposed to the cold by approximately 50%. There are additional energy savings in less maintenance of lawns, driveways, and area lighting because the Home Farm Development will occupy approximately 14 acres of land. A single-family development with the same number of units would occupy 25 to 50 acres of land. The close proximity of the Home Farm Development to the City core should result in savings of energy costs for gasoline. Residents will be able to use the bus, bike and walk to work, school, shopping and recreation. Hydrant Flow Testing Attachment 3 SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Paris Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 MEMORANDUM To: ,Mike Burke, Krebs and Lansing Engineers ,From: Jay Nadeau, South Burlington Water Department SuperintendentAr_� Date: January 24, 2001 Subject. Water line information,- property between Kennedy Dr, Hinesburg Rd. and Old Farm Rd. South Burlington I have attached copies of our main line gate valve and fire hydrant maps as well as a copy of a section of the plans for Cardinal Woods off from Hinesburg Ave. This information should give you an idea of the water main types and sizes in the area we discussed by phone this afternoon. Please note the water line location at the corner of Hayes Ave and Hinesburg Rd. I do not have any flow test information for any of the hydrants in the area along Kennedy Drive or Hinesburg Rd. If you should require this information please call me to set up a time_ We would like to avoid flowing any hydrants this winter, but we can. if it is absolutely necessary. The City of South Burlington charges for the time associated with its water department employees to perform and record a hydrant flow test. This fee is billed to the requesting company after the test is completed. As always, if you have any questions or I can be of any further service, please give me call. Post -it® Fax Note 7671 Date/ Zy0 ( p tee► To ZZ ' From 7-U CoJDepi Z / Co. Phone 0 Phone n Fax s 6)&— � 8 Fax 4 No Text 1 y � I 220�- 1 CV 1 In �Op05 � V G pR0\Npt. �314 3;3 / JL Q 32S �.32432 [ 3i? 3 t2 aft eR8`["CRC. 8 321 316 316 335 ®� 334 J Q q �. R 4pYFR P. 3 30 I 306 y 292 OXCRO�rT �w 3s'O' 3I9 309 R pQ` COUNTRY FARES 0 PAR K304� 333 32 303 O m �0 4 �2�301 �?+33r & 330 •�- l 297 329 328 299 WELLES LEY 40`�C 298 it GROVE � 39232 N � qo 6EOAOETOwN 3911393 �oU rE WINDING / 43 1/6 HROOK a /` 395 4t U Hv •�to 50 _� ��� '"�.. fit+ �'� V►•G WINDRIOOE �pOfl� 401 /i 396 1/ 400 p 397 oy 4 p�01 O SUOARTAf f 399 441 ^398 bbb 402 ill — t^ (� 403 4( O 404 Z �� SOLTti t ,o q 417 tr,�� a 415 31 TREETOP 493 CIRCLE R. 1 zss a o.t_ � S301-372 I � OOOg GQwO`�P1. �336 3'9 3v� I (� K� 345 1 372 DERBY CIRCLE �: S�Hp ; 34� 3 33y./� 338 32 _ 3`� .s 318 3 CWO !4C 355 354 �N 347 343 322� - B� QL 50 Sp 342 333 330 32-3 HLOWOFF N0,4 356 345 341 332 ` 331 1 \ C W O 15 �{ 0 � 358 3: 3b 4 \_ c r/ 348 ' � �� 339 4P2 32325 357 1. i 4i Q!361 362t� 366, J O �ty� FOREST 327 R 8 6 J 34A �� PARK 326 °e 9 eP 1 COUNTRY PARK 36T N=474-448Z 474 477 , QG 478� \2 Q`6 ' 476 g " 475 484 -r 50 485 �C 486 Z WELLESLEY 487 h' PROVE vPC, �H�Sg p OEOROETOWN WINDINfl�4.8„ BROOK H, 5 487-502 500 488 � G Dso 499 498 8 A� 51851g �, 489 � WINORIDA£ / , E 1517 ES5Q4-52Q �. 512 497 0 � .516 515 _ L 514 { Y�koQ qq6 j. �49 513 3, 491 8UA,KTREE 493 - Q� /. P 492 494 495 667 0 566 o ��T,,�• 587 I recs 6 ro �v Cr• 58•7� � TREETOP Il t�1 CIRCLE DR. IFire� Protection Publications ppOklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078 kPa Psi 827 120 793 115 758 110 724 105 690 100 655 95 621 90 586 85 552 80 517 75 483 70 448 65 414 60 379 55 345 50 310 45 275 40 241 35 206 30 172 25 137 20 103.4 15 69.0 10 34.5 5 0 Universal Water Flow Test Summary Sheet Conducted byf, Location r k': %`., -' Date Hydrant coefficient Elevation Static 2fr#� Residual o- @Flow r r. YYY■■■WY■YYYI■1■Y■11■WWYWYWWYYWYYIYYYWW■YWYWYYWWYW� nnn■■■n■n■n■■n■■■■■e■■nnnnn■■nnn■ ■innno■■ GPM 100 200 300 Imp. Gal. 83 167 250 Liters 380 759• 1139 400 333 1519 500 416 1899 600 500 2278 700 583 2658 800 666 3038 900 749 3418 1000 833 3797 Scale A 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Scale B 167 333 500 666 833 999 1166 1332 1499 1665 759 1519 2278 3038 3797 4557 5316 6075 6835 7594 400 800 1200 _ 1600 2000 2400 2800 3200 3600 4000 ScaleC 333 666 999 1332 1665 1998 2332 2665 2998 3331 1519 3038 4557 6075 7594 9113 10,632 12,151 13,670 15,188 Copyright ©1990 Oklahoma Slate University FLOW n5/ 1/ZUU1 14: 1 f bU:Ldb4P41b CHAMPLAIN WATEP nIST PAGE 02 Champlain Water Distract 493 Qucen City Park !toad South Burlington. V7' 6,;403 Phone: (80;1) i64•7454 Fire Flow Field Report City : South Burlington Street: IKennedyDrive Location Description : Flow hydrant #401 located at end of 8' DI water line located at Windridge Condos. Resid hyd #400 located on same water line at entrance to Windridge Condos. Line is tapped into Kennedy Drive 12" AC water main Date/Time Tested: 4/17/2001 11:30:00 AM Tester. N,DP Flow H drant In fQr�» wort Hyd 1: # ao1 7 Hyd 1: Static S0 psi llyd I: Pitot 65 psi Hyd I: OD 2.5 Hyd I: C I F—T9-7Hyd Hyd I: Flow 1. 1352.80 gpm Hyd 2: # U Hyd 2: static 0 psi Hyd 2. Pitot ��—� psi Hyd 2. OD (—o—j 2: C L�� 0 Hyd 2: Flow F 0-007 gpm Hyd 3# Hyd 3 Static Hyd 3 Pitot Hyd 3 OD Hyd 3 C Hyd 3 Flow E= p,si Psi � 01 L--O.QO J gpm Flow = 29.83*C*ODA2*sgr(pitot) Total Flow : 1352.8q--7 gpm Residual Hvdrant Information Hyd I # 40o Hyd I Static 73 Hyd I Res 68 Hyd 2 # Hyd 2 Static o Hyd 2 ,Res 0 Hyd 3 # Hyd 3 Static o Hyd 3 Res 0 System Conditions: Weather: Clear Temp: 40- 55 degrees LUU1 14. 1 / OG�ab�iG4,3� UNAMPLAIN WAIEP U151 PAGE 03 Champlain Water District 403 Queen City Pork Rr)ad South $u.•lingtnn, VP n;.,,,.? ,� d Repo r t 1602? 86J-7li.t City., So. Burlington Street : Hinesburg Rd Location Description : [Flow low hyd # 330 located between 2 Resid hyds. on Hinesburg Rd in 12"AC main. hyd. and Resid hyd #327 about the same elevation. Flow hyd slightly wer in elevation than Resid hyd #332 Date/Time Tested: Tester F am-ffYdrant In ormati g. Hyd l: # 330 7 Hyd 2: # Hyd 3# Hyd 1: Static 81 si P Hyd 2: Static �0 � psi psi Hyd.3 Static C� Hyd 1: Pitot 60 psi Hyd 2: Pitot j� p psi L--J Hyd 3 Pitot psi p Hyd X: OD 2.5 Hyd 2: OD ;i,Tyd 3 OD Hyd 1; C 0.9 ,Hyd 2: C (- o �lL `--0.00 Hyd 3 C—r-----,— _ _J Hyd 1: Flow 1299.72 gpm Hyd 2: Flow gp n Hyd 3 Flow 0.00 gpm Flow = 29.83*C*OD^2*sgr(pitot) Total Flow : 1299.72 8P►n Residual Hvdrant Information Hyd I # 327 Hyd 2 # 332 Hyd 3 # Hyd I Static 82 Hyd 2 Static L80 ,Hyd 3 Static 0 Hyd I Res 72 Hyd 2 Res 70 Hyd 3 Res 0� System Conditions: Weather: clear, Temp: 40-45 degrees, 12 AC main supplied from the Kennedy Drive line and also through Grandview/ Timber Lane/ Hayes Avenue water mains. ""+- +��+�+ +�•+VV�V VYVYJJ l,r1kVirLH1IN wHICIS 4101 1"AUL 104 Champlain Water District 403 Qzweu City Park R/,#,f 501161/3arlbrgro+yV7,05-41,,= Fire Flow Field Report Phone: (M)84j•71s4 City : South Burlington Street : Kennedy Drive Location Description : Flow hydrant #405 located in drive entrance to Tree Top Condos on Kennedy Dr, on 12 AC water main, Resid hyd. #391 located on Kennedy Dr near Hinesburg Rd on 12" water main Date/Time Tested: 4H 712001 11:20:00 AM Tester: JN, DP Flow Mdrairt Information - Hyd l: # 405 Hyd 2: # Hyd 3# Hyd 1. static 78 psi Hyd 1. ,Pilot 65 psi Hyd 1: OD 2.5 Hyd 2: Static r 0�J psi Hyd 2: ,Pilot �—�0— -� psi Hyd 2: OD ( o —1� Hyd 3 Static �� psi Hyd 3 ,Pilot psi Hyd 3 OD Hyd 1: C 0.9 Hyd 1: Flow 1352.80 gpm Hyd 2: C� 0 �J Hyd 2: Flow 0.00 gpm Hyd 3 C Hyd 3 Flow 0.00 gpm Flow = 29.83*C*OD^2*sgr(pitot) Total Flow : [ 1352.80 gpm Residual Hydrant Information Hyd 1 # 391 Hyd 1 Static 80 Hyd 2 # Hyd 2 Static 0 Hyd 3 # Hyd 3 Static 0 Hyd l Res 72 Hyd 2 Res 0 Hyd 3 Res 0 System Conditions: Weather: Clear Temp: 40-45 degrees. Both hydrants located on a 12 AC water main. ""r `ter `�� i' i' tl cJ�v V`. c/`�JJ Vn,-iir LHl�V 4YH IGf' L'1JI r HUG V:1 r� \'GLAND 338 y HONE { 337 1 1 Ip�TERSTI I, 1+ IN i S j QD 1 �pR �314 313 / 325 ! �- �% 1.324 32 317 312 / 2 f ■ 313 CR2Y CjfjC • 1 f 3211 ` 311 291 �.►�'� t■� 334 • .. 318 316 p A \ v /� 335 Opy� Q Q 3C 307/ 0 306`� n _ 292 pO'YC A • 309 P COUNTRY t"1` FOREL �s RaRr 11 320' 319 99 P PAR 1(30441�. 9 \ A r0 333 32 303 292 Q 1 302 b ' 3300 1 301 1 330 329 32B 299390 t1p� WELLEY a '� C 2 9 8 GRO 392 / 327 hlH�S�� GEORGETOWN \ 393/ WINDIN / \ 43 /. Y ®ROOK p / 395 • 4 1 �o` 0 1p 5O� o W1t�DR100E � �C �4' 396 400 ! p t�w �r� a• O 397 O SUQARTREE Q � 416 O y 399 ..All�^39B Q" 402 I`� 403 N 494 0� 418 404 Sbvly 4 4 417 415 .3f TREETOP --• --• �-�- +. vvrvv -.v+vv v ir���� LMiI \ WM I LI} •i1J 1 rN�]G UO 414 O U Ik_ N 4L �� 40 Q C fly r 413 0 r 40; r aoa � f 1 TREETOP 491 410 6 " 1 1 i ry �7 406 1 N� 470 A. C i1 471 all A._C_ ROUT 473 450 A7 p0 �� Oy 474 A6 p�4: l2 d1. 4ITEIl__ A8 y� O 478 1� All 1p � 1 a 475 n •ci 6tn i, �1n A to ° �°i CU S To „. m. _,� �, Y� Y BLDO. 890 ` \�p9 �� 479T V J',n -C)AS �1 �,,•�^ �� _ y''o; v � �� ,, tom. �.' �` \ o� 477 sP` 478 00,480 6 P6 C. A I �\ 48-6 A3 .` 484- �.. \\\,�n � Traffic Report Attachment 4 South Burlington School District Attachment 5 Act 250 School impact Questionnaire for Residential Projects Applicant to Complete: Applicant Name: Municipality: S-luth Rurlinrtton Number of Lots or Units: 1 1- Ha es vefHines ur lKenn Estimated Number of Students: 56 muiti-farnily units x 2 bedrooms=112 x .1313=14.71 46 townhouse x 3 bedrooms= 135 x.2625 P! 35.43 Total, 50,14 School Superintendent or Equivalent to Complete: What schools under your supervision will provide educational services for families who will live in this project? Elementary School: Chamberlin Middle School: FHTMS High School: SBHS Do these schools have the capacity to accept the additional students listed above? (assume equal grade distribution) _ Yes or No If "no," what is the deficiency? 11uhile at the present time the school district can accommodate the additional stadents projected by this individual project, the concern for the School District is with the cumulative impact of prior and continuing development in our conununity and the District's capacity to serve the students. This project, coupled with previous projects from last year and current requests, may cause the district to accelerate the year where the maximum capacity is reached, necessitating construction of a new facility, The passing of Act 60 adds additional concerns regarding development and developments impact on the tax :-ate. Constaiction aid for schools are now placed on a priority listing that would appear to make it difficult for So. Burlington to gain aid in a timely fashion to meet impending capacity needs if development would continue at the accelerated pace of the past two years. Any construction costs that are not offset by revenues other than property tax would further penalize our, communities by increasing our above block cost for students and the corresponding taxes that would be raised and sent to the sharing pool. «'hat plans are in place to correct the problem? Impact fees will serve to recapture space and renovate them into useable classrooms. District Offices will rent/build space outside of school facilities. If plane exist, how could this applicant help achieve those plans beyond adding new homes to the grand list? it is recormnended that South Burlington continue to balance its growth bcuc een business and housing. 110 you have other comments? Ste above I certify the above information is true and accurate to the Best of my knowledge. Marilvn Frederick Name p-osiress Managcr ositi a 2-22-01 ate Are you available, after sufficient notice, to answer questions related to the above statements at an Act 250 hearing? Yes or _ No 1 r.JL vJ'_ Jll ^. L'J1C, :JJ is , . Wetland Evaluation. Attachment 6 WM. D. COUNTRYMAN Environmental Assessment And Planning 868 WINCH HILL ROAD NORTHFIELD, VERMONT 05663 802-485-8421 20 November 2000 O'Brien Brothers Realty ATTN: Pat O'Brien P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407 Subject: Home Farm wetland delineations Dear Pat, I delineated the wetlands on the Home Farm parcel on 3 November, and Arthur Gilman and I completed the Corps of Engineers data forms for the project (enclosed) on 14 November. There are three wetlands in the area proposed for the project; all are in drainage swales on the Kennedy Drive side of the property. These wetlands, designated "A", `B" and "C" are in well-defined shallow ravines. These three wetlands are along drains that eventually lead to Potash Brook, passing across a large expanse of poorly to very poorly drained Enosburg & Whatley soils. There is an extensive Class Two wetland along Potash Brook, and it is conceivable that wetlands on the Home Farm site might be connected across Kennedy Drive to those Class Two wetlands. I will try to determine if we are dealing with Class Two or Class Three wetlands this afternoon while in the area on another project, and will contact you once I have visited the site. Sincerely, Errol C. Briggs ECB/s Encls. Project Title: IrOM� FARN) File Number: Transect: ) Plot: W(TI Um @ FIA9 A 9 Dale: 14 NOV rOO 0 DATA -- VEGETATION Stalum (D ONLY) atum and Species Dominance RoLo Percent Dominance NWI Status TPWS-: IJ(jrJE !,s WtTIAND -- -9Ru/J: N6Ae is U1fT11uD — >Jc�br: GeteltisiS 7o 561AWUM pU1CA*AA,4 FA i41 hyR 1 vM J felt x FIF&I4A 10 IS FA C FA C. J11161'R,ti s 1 rRF2M e J "4 7"C e 0-1C-i cg�bllls FA cu. TRAcE FA to OBL: FACW: FAC: FACU: UPL: ' Tally {Dominants ONLY): I SUM: 100 x Dominant (OSL+FACW+FAC)/Tully Sum 10Q� Describe Vegetation Disturbance: Describe Problem Vegetation: DATA -- SOIL Soil Taxonomy: Cores of Enyinaers Re tonal Draino a Class: Criterion: Is Puh''-hed Soil Survey Available? Yes tg No ❑ Title/Dote: 50i ) S-,SA JC 04171CWJfs) Soil Type Mapped: &jJ16JAS -F S�r I-r Ce rNT9, JT- I97,( Depth Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell, Moist) d�olor of Mottles (Munsell, Moist) USDA Texture, iron or manganese nodules or concretions, restrictive AAbbundance/Controst layers, root distribution, oxidixed rhizospheres, etc. AlluvtJM /mo&� �6t1J� LGAU#X Remarks: Sketch Landscape Position: I I r � J/ ) 1. 'W in ee W. Ieee.Me I. e.ldwe fuel th. ws le NOT wrow SOIL DETERMINATION NOTE; 1 Two en.cu.l 1. _lW for ... by U. 9— Ewglerw crp. el Enpin.«.I rw. wl.:d. ar..1. Moe En9l" 31.1.. mey b. Ineppreprbl.. 1 Tit. Inlrpnl:v. m 11- may ►. i-W.prble M umwud cows. ® All dominant plants are OBLIGATE. ®O AN dominant plants are FACULTATNE WET AND OBLIGATE and the topographic boundary Is abrupt. © Soil is frequently PONDED or FLOODED for a duration longer than two weeks during the growing season. (attach an explanation of the basis for your conclusions). ED ® The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a VERY POORLY DRAINED SOIL' and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. ®� The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as o POORLY DRAINED SOIL and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. The sell meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as o SOMEWHAT POORLY DRAINED SOIL that has either of the following two characteristics': Yes NO 1. Within 6 Inches of the soil surface there are: Yes No a. soil mottles within an A or Ap horizon and the subsoil is mottled throughout; OR b. common to many, distinct or prominent mottles with a matrix of chrome 3 or less; OR CD C3 c. distinct or prominent oxidized rhizospheres and the subsoil Is mottled throughout, 2. Within 24 inches of the soil surface, there are mottles which CD CD are common to many, distinct or prominent, and that are chrome 2 or less, and one of the following: Yes No ❑ a. In the horizon that lies within 10 Inches of the soil surface and directly beneath a dark" A or Ap horizon, the matrix is chrome 3 or less, the mottles are at least 10R In abundance and distinct or prominent. Ob. When o dork'Ap horizon Is between 10 and 14 inches thick, wetness morphology may be masked by organic motto. Normally, these problem situations will be considered hydric when: i, hydrophytes are prevalent, II. there is no evidence of altered hydrology, and ili, in the horizon that lies directly beneath the Ap horizon, the matrix color is chrome 3 or less and mottles are at least 10% in abundance and distinct or prominent. Check here and attach a description of your procedures and conclusions if one of the following options were chosen for your hydric soil determination: measured redox potentials, colormstric lest for ferrous iron test (r,r,—Dipyridil), or other meosurements and observations. . Typically in New England, soils having these morphologies will be classified In an oquic suborder or an aquic subgroup in soil taxonomy. to Note: a dark A or Ap is defined as having a value of 3 or less and a chrome of 2 or less Remarks: 1, lyerelepy N dlen IN me.l 4160,11 leave I. .been.. DATA k 2. lnlrp .W Win. m,rt ...olds " NOTE: epp epAel.n..o a err. b..n 16« 6, DETERMINATION Ipnl a If+ ■wwn, recent �.NNr tendlderr, rd relw.IrW .n«ellen.. etc HYDROLOGY d. W«prelel:en el nydr.lepy prey r.qU,. r.pwl.d ebwr "n...« mac Ina. ene wa.on. ❑ Recorded Data: Stream, lake or tidol gage Identification: Aerial Photograph Identification: Other Identification: ❑ No Recorded Data Available REPORT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING OBSERVATIONS: Depth to Free Water. Depth to Saturation: Q �' Describe Altered Hydrology: N6wE ❑ Inundated IN Saturated in upper 12in. ❑ Water Works ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres ❑ Drift Lines Ga Water Stained Leaves ® Water —borne Sediment ❑ Surface Scoured Areas wyWetlond Drainage Patterns Deposits ❑ No Evidence of Significant Hydrological Modification AND there is one or more Morphological Plant Adaptation SUCH AS: ❑ Pneumalophores ❑ Buttressed Trees ❑ Hypertrophied Lenticels ❑ Stooling ❑ Adventitious Roots ❑ Inflated Leaves, Stems, or Roots ❑ Shallow Root Systems ❑ Floating Leaves ❑ Asrenchymo in Roots k stems ❑ Polymorphic Leaves ❑ Hydric Soils and NO visible evidence of significant hydrological modification Remarks: CONCLUSIONS Project Title: IIV/hF IFAApA Delineator: AYGe1#40 C. 'RAIGOS Tronsect: Plot: ut./ LQ* .4, c Date:: 14 $av (tg Yes No Hydrophylic Vsgelation Criterion Met? 19 ❑ Hydric Soils Criterion Met? �� tp ❑ Yes No Welland Hydrology Criterion Met? ® ❑ IS THIS DATAPOINT WITHIN A WETLAND? ❑ Remarks: Project Title: HOME rAR#, File Number: Tronsect: I Plot: UPu9b Q r1 — i Dole: ly MIU. ZO 0 V DATA -- VEGETATION Stratum and Species (DOMINANTS ONLY) Dominance Ratio Percent Dominance NWI Slalus TREES: PI"J5 SIkoVtjs 7s- FAtu PRJr433 SQRpt,'M 2S Fick SWR t93: HA114Me(13 Vt4frNlAdA CAA1A WA IS S F4 c FAc.0 The-,yPT«rs NarA lr�(PACTIf Hf�IrbORr.,t gU TRAM FA C Tally (Dominants ONLY): OBL: FACW: FAC: � FACU: � UPL: SUM: Z 100 x Dominont(OBL+FACW+FAC)/Tally Sum Describe Vegetation Disturbance: Describe Problem Vegetation: DATA -- SOIL Soil Taxonomy: Corps of En Re Iona? Droina a Class: Criterion: Rex() Is Published Soil Survey Available? Yes © No ❑ Title/Dale: Set l SJ/WP� , Gwrn 1p(� 7197Y Soil Type Mopped: wl JJ391i 114 F-0 sfiI►D 4'r 't1i� Depth Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell, Moist) olor of Mottles Munsell, Moist) USDA Texture, iron or manganese nodules or concretions, restrictive undance/Contrast layers, root distribution, oxidixed rhizospheres, etc. 2- 10 YA' 3 /L ut�y P D�fF A, 16YR 3/2 �� F,urS�.roy Id�M 2-� a % IGr/t A3 t o yt 4 /4 �SAA. 14,4,0 r Remarks: Sketch Landscape Position: I I ,I I. Asa• i, M Wo Is" , I Is .vY«,es that IN «s Is Nor Roxw SOIL DETERMINATION NOTE: L TNe eh.cut.l to sold I✓ ... by a,. w. Cwe4M asrs. It 4,gM..nl ,. «told. th. is N.+ C"k.41 St. may b. bwyyrcor4lo. i iN. 6,l.ryr4va rein'— may I,. Imppr.prbl. in vnu.ud cows. O ® Ali dominant plants ore OBLIGATE. ® AN dominant plants are FACULTATIVE WET AND OBLIGATE and the topographic boundary Is abrupt. ® Soil Is frequently PONDED or FLOODED for a duration longer than two weeks during the growing season. (attach an explanation of the basis for your conclusions). ® The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a VERY POORLY DRAINED SOIL' and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. o ® The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as o POORLY DRAINED SOIL' and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. ®The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a SOMEWWIT POORLY DRAINED SOIL that has either of the following two characteristics': oik 1. Within 6 Inches of the soil surface there are; Yes No ®o. soil mottles within on A or Ap horizon and lhs subsoil is mottled throughout; OR ® b. common to many, distinct or prominent mottles with a matrix of chromo 3 or less; OR ryl c. distinct or prominent oxidized rhizospheres 11J and the subsoil Is mottled throughout. 2. Within 24 inches of the soil surface, there are mottles which ore common to many, distinct or prominent, and that ore chroma 2 or less, and one of the following: Yes No ® a. In the horizon that lies within 10 inches of the soil surface and directly beneath a dark" A or Ap horizon, the matrix is chromo 3 or less, the mottles ore at least 10% in abundance and distinct or prominent. ® b. When a dork•Ap horizon Is between 10 and 14 inches thick, wetness morphology may be masked by organic molter. Normally, these problem situations will be considered hydrk when: I. hydrophytes are prevalent, li. there is no evidence of altered hydrology, and III. in the horizon that lies directly beneath the Ap horizon, the matrix color is chroma 3 or less and mottles are of least 10X in abundance and distinct or prominent. o Check here and attach a description of your procedures and conclusions if one of the following options wars chosen for your hydric soil determination: measured rsdox potentials, colormetric lest for ferrous iron tut (d.u,—Dipyridil), or other measurements and observations. *Typically in New England, soils having these morphologies will be classified In an oquic suborder or an aquic subgroup in soil taxonomy. .. Note: a dark A or Ap Is defined as having o value of 3 or lass and a chroma of 2 or less Remarks: I, Iy0rs4« gy Is sllIN ,nesl dir-At 4slvs to absano. !� DATA k 2. Wooll"4U« s m,Yt oo-le« ay..w0pMt— .f N..b.—oll— n NOTE: DETERMINATION seht sl IN s«.on, r.c«t ...Ihr e.nia«w, .,d r.l«.hW HYDROLOGY J. Worpr.4ao .f lyd,ol.W may r.p L. r.p-t.4 ob—"...v.r mp/1 aq/1 MI NO«,4 ❑ Recorded Data: Stream, lake or tidot gage Identification: Aerial Photograph Identification: Other Identification: ❑ No Recorded Data Available REPORT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING OBSERVATIONS: Depth to free Water. 7111, Depth to Saturation: ;�AY Is Describe Altered Hydrology: NWE ❑ Inundated ❑ Saturated in upper 12in. ❑ Water Marks ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Water Stained Leaves ❑ Water —borne Sediment ❑ Surface Scoured Areas ❑Welland Drainage Patterns Deposits ❑ No Evidence of Significant Hydrological Modification AND there is one or more Morphological Plant Adaptation SUCH AS: ❑ Pneumotophores ❑ Buttressed Trees ❑ Hypertrophied Lenticels ❑ Stooling ❑ Adventitious Roots ❑ Inlloted Leaves, Stems, or Roots ❑ Shallow Root Systems ❑ Floating Leaves ❑ Aerenchymo in Roots k stems ❑ Polymorphic Leaves ❑ Hydric Soils and NO visible evidence of significant hydrological modification Remarks: �� Project Title: hOMA- FAAA, 1 CONCLUSIONS �e Delineator. 4VGel~ej ��(•1/S Transact: l QftA/SD o-r Plot: FiA _` Dole: Ih l3fd Zoao Yes No Hydrophylic Vegetation Criterion f I � Met? ICI. ❑ Hydric Soils Criterion Met? ❑ ® Yes No Welland Hydrology Criterion Mel? Q IS THIS DATAPOINT WITHIN A WETLAND7 ❑ Remarks: Project Title: Hare File Number: rl E fA 'I A" Tronsect: Z Plot: WrrUab @Ft AS 8-22 Dole: iqmwc/ aF/1 aot DATA -- rolum and Species Fs�,DOMINANTS DomnancePercent Dominance NWI Status VEGETATIONRolio ONLY) TRF(S: WAF 1►r LJOLA,00 50 i1131: A054 RL)dR,M hrur: Glrc e. A Su►AtA is GBL IPA OBL: FACW: FAC; FACU: UPL: Tally (Dominants ONLY): 100 x Dominont(OBL+FACW+FAC)/Tally Sum Describe Vegetation Disturbance: Describe Problem Vegetation: DATA -- SOIL Soil Taxonomy: Cores of Engineers Re,anal Oro no a Class: Criterion: Is Published Soil Survey Available? Yes ® No ❑ Title/Dole: St;l TJAJtg C� CNltTf-rJbdaJ Soil Type Mapped: E41d3( wwkM1 Jai 11 Ck),J-4,urt (99v Depth Horizon Matrix Colorolor (Munsell, Moist) of Mottles Munsell, Moist) USDA Texture, iron or manganese nodules or concretions, restrictive undance/Contrast layers, root distribution, oxidixed rhizospheres, etc. a-2 1 Sy 3�2 N04P- Afiftco-, 2- 57 411 _ 7 A 3 5 � 2.5 /1 �' Oti AJ1C Vt S Gl ty Cc/s f U7 SA�1J 3 /i of Remarks: Sketch Landscape Position: 1 1 � � 1 Un tJPL 1 1. 1p• ti M lM Mxe.lry le ••:d•nee lNl !Iv eel le 1•nr InORIC SOIL DETERMINATION NOTE: t TI•e cAKbeet le wad lr ... by as Ner CnybM Crpe el (ne4••nl wlyd• u...I. He.. [nebnd slelee may b• kwpprepr44. l TN. W.ryr•ay. Wolini may be Nepprepr4le In ern d ces.e. ®F-1 An dominant plants art OBLIGATE. © All dominant plants are FACULTATIVE WET AND OBUCATE and the topographic boundary Is abrupt. O © Soil is frequently PONDED or FLOODED for a duration longer than two weeks during the growing season. (attach an explanation of the basis for your conclusions). ® The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a VERY POORLY DRAINED S01C and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. ®� The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a POORLY DRAINED SOIL' and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. oo The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a SOMEWHAT POORLY DRAINED SOIL that has either of the following two characteristics': Yes NO 1. Within 6 Inches of the soil surface there are: Yes No o. soiI mottles within an A at Ap horizon and the subsoil is mottled throughout; OR b. common to many, distinct or prominent mottles with a matrix of chroma 3 or less; OR c, distinct or prominent oxidized rhlzospheres and the subsoil Is mottled throughout. O O 2. Within 24 inches of the soil surface, there ore mottles which are common to many, distinct or prominent, and that are chroma 2 or less, and one of the following: Yes No o O a. In the horizon that lies within 10 inches of the soil surface and directly btneolh a dark' A or Ap horizon, the matrix is chroma 3 or less; the mottles are of least IOR in abundance and distinct or prominent. a b. When a dork•Ap horizon Is between 10 and 14 inches thick, wetness morphology may be mosked by organic matter. Normally, these problem situations will be considered hydric when: L hydrophytes are prevalent, it. there is no evidence of altered hydrology, and 6i, in the horizon that lies directly beneath the Ap horizon, the matrix color is chromo 3 or less and mottles are at least 10% in abundance and distinct or prominent. Check here and attach a description of your procedures and conclusions if one of the following options were chosen for your hydric sole determination: measured redox potentials, colormstric lest for ferrous Iron lest (w,w,—Dipyridil), or other measurements and observations. • Typically in New England, soils having these morphologies will be closslfled in an aquic suborder or on aquic subgroup in soil taxonomy. to Note: a dark A or Ap Is defined as having a value of 3 or less and a chroma of 2 or less Remarks: 1. Hydrel"y Is sit" IN met flncvll 1464ue to ebewv.. DATA & 1. Wrpr.414ne NOTE: .viol ".old., W eW.,&I— .1 the ab—ol;— n DETERMINATION eel el IN eK.en, rKMI .ee0— een/Wn, end relwNW NIwe14n., .la HYDROLOGY ]. Wwpr.t t;.n er lyd,.WW may r.q k. .p-l.d •beuvG— w.r • elan M. N ❑ Recorded Data Stream, lake or tidal goge Identification: Aerial Photograph Identification: Other Identification: ❑ No Recorded Data Available REPORT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING OBSERVATIONS: Depth to Free Water. IP Depth to Saturation: lie. Describe Altered Hydrology: NG#j ❑ inundated ❑ Saturated in upper 12in. ❑ Water Marks ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres ❑ Drift Lines ® Water Stained Leaves ® Woler—borne Sediment ❑ Surface Scoured Areas OaWetlond Drainage Patterns Deposits ❑ No Evidence of Significant Hydrological Modification AND there is one or more Morphological Plant Adaptation SUCH AS: ❑ Pneumalophores ® Buttressed Trees ❑ Hypertrophied Lenlictis ❑ Stooling ❑ Adventitious Roots ❑ Inflated Leaves, Stems, or Roots ® Shallow Root Systems ❑ Floating Leaves ❑ Aerenchyma in Roots & stems ❑ Polymorphic Leaves ❑ Hydric Soils and NO visible evidence of significant hydrological modification Remarks: CONCLUSIONS Project Title: Nome FAlim Delineator. E.C. VAI&GS /AJr,,IM4A► Transect: Z Plot: U17 NJ--@ Date: f 50 L " hNal�m8FR t000 Yes No Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Mel? ® ❑ Hydric Soils Criterion Met? ® ❑ Yes No Welland Hydrology Criterion Met7 ® ❑ IS THIS DATAPOINT WITHIN A WETLAND? ❑ Remarks: Project Title, HoftF FARM File Number: TransecL 2 Plot: UPIA►JD eC% FIAf G-Z1 Dale: 1� fmf-,#4o:a 2600 DATA -- Slralum and Species Dominance Ratio Percent Dominance NWI Status VEGETATION (DOMINANTS ONLY) r9EQ: P)ei,S S A04s1 ? 6 FACLI rYq,4 uWA0GJ.N 2C $11fRAylal AMER1t^JA S fJIGU CO✓i+Jt3.f /S kkuf fw*4 5' JP� Ri 4AW)J Fb JJULA S fAC. 74do &411: S UFL NFRp3: P►,►tcN(tLA aF�F�S G,1J(*CA(.s pRic��Lc,if FAC1t (V164� CA�14EOI5 TM tee FAtu �pYtS �1LQPaL(n/JrU TAAtF FAc Mo�orIt LOAA 5 f�cw OUS,Sbt CL/1y'&A)JAAA �MCF FACet CAAEk CD,KeA i ti t S S FA C. D'��6P7!/L I ►s Pq T� cF a ft 5 ;1 c H Tally (Dominonts ONLY): OBL: FACW: FAG: FACU: Z UPL: SUM:2 100 x Dominant (OBL+FACW+FAC)/Tally Sum d� Describe Vegetation Disturbance: Describe Problem Vegetation: DATA -- SOIL Soil Taxonomy: Corps of En9inaers Re ionol Drama a Gloss: Criterion: Is Published Soil Survey Available? Yes ® No ❑ Title/Date: 50i) 5-uAWEy � N1rtfXJ)f.1 Soil Type Mapped: ld 1 ui�W 1�1DSIQ 10401 Ft.,? Lot" coogT7 U1: 197Y Depth Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell, Moist) olor of Mottles Munsell, Moist) USDA Texture, iron or manganese nodules or concretions. restrictive undance/Contrast layers, root distribution, oxidixed rhizospheres, etc. D�f f o- 3 '°, ��y13�2 u�� F�Np St,wy �dA/r 3— S At tu�.a 914 N40 r S 5—IS I01.t 4I6 UOiuF Remarks: Sketch Landscape Position: art U�p� I. '80' In .e Iha rsae.lne it wid.noo that the tee to NOT WIDAJC SOIL DETERMINATION NOTE: L n . tI,—%9 ve it se for a.. by the .1r• code w co a• e1 cndne.: re w.t.:d. u.. th "_ C,ebro stele' may b. Irwppr.pr, . 1 M. Werpr.Wt .,At- may be Inoppropwt. In unvead <a.e•. Tes rr0 CD ® All dominant plants are OBLIGATE. ® AS dominant plants are FACULTATIVE WET AND OBUCATE and the topographic boundary Is abrupt. O ® Soil is frequently PONDED or FLOODED for a duration longer than two weeks during the growing season. (attach on explanation of the basis for your conclusions). ®The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a VERY POORLY DRAINED SOIL' and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. O ® The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regionalcriteriaas a POORLY DRAINED SOIL' and there is no evidence of oltered hydrology. ® The sell meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a SOMEWRAT POORLY DRAINED SOIL that has either of the following two characteristics': Yes NO ED ® 1. Within 6 Inches of the soil surface there are: Yes No slat a. soil mottles within on A or Ap horizon lJ and the subsoil is mottled throughout; OR ® b. common to many, distinct or prominent mottles with a matrix of chroma 3 or less; OR ❑ to c. distinct or prominent oxidized rhizospheres and the subsoil Is mottled throughout. Q ® 2. Within 24 inches of the soil surface, there are mottles which are common to many, distinct or prominent, and that are chroma 2 or less, and one of the following: Yes No ED ® a. In the horizon that lies within 10 inches of the soil surface and directty beneath a dark" A or Ap horizon, the matrix is chroma 3 or less, the mottles are at least 10X in abundance and distinct or prominent. ® b. When a dorktAp horizon Is between 10 and 14 inches thick, wetness morphology may be masked by organic matter. Normally, these problem situations will be considered hydric when: I. hydrophytes are prevalent, It. there is no evidence of altered hydrology, and III. in the horizon that lies directly beneath the Ap horizon, the matrix color is chrome 3 or less and mottles are at least 10% in abundance and distinct or prominent. Check here and attach a description of your procedures and conclusions if one of the following options were chosen for your hydric soil determination: measured redox potentials, colormstric test for ferrous iron lest (tr,t=,—Dipyridil), or other measurements and observations. • Typically in New England. soils having these morphologies will be classified In on aquic suborder or an oquic subgroup in soil taxonomy. to Note: o dark A or Ap is defined as having o value of 3 or less Remarks: 1, Hydretoay M often the mod 616cv11 r..Ivr. to obe—s. DATA k z. Mlwp.waent en-t «newer the eppeprleten... a the sb.—Uan. i, NOTE: DETERMINATION sphl •r It. ..a.on, —I ..char .ondluane, " ..t«.hw HYDROLOGY 3. Wwprstat; n of ydreloay may r.q,Jre repealed obeorrabons e.., mere awn en waeon, ❑ Recorded Data: Stream, lake or tidal Bogs Identification: Aerial Photograph Identification: Other Identification: ❑ No Recorded Data Available REPORT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING OBSERVATIONS: pu Depth to Free Water. Depth to Saturation: �(p" Describe Altered Hydrology: ❑ Inundated ❑ Saturated in upper 12in. ❑ Water Marks ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Water Stained Leaves ❑ Water —borne Sediment ❑ Surface Scoured Artos ❑Wetland Drainage Patterns Deposits ❑ No Evidence of Significant Hydrological Modification AND there is one or more Morphological Plant Adaptation SUCH AS: ❑ Pneumolophores ❑ Buttressed Trees ❑ Hypertrophied Lenticels ❑ Stooling ❑Adventitious Roots ❑ Inflated Leaves, Stems, or Roots ❑ Shallow Root Systems ❑ Floating Leaves ❑ Aerenchymo in Roots & stems ❑ Polymorphic Leaves ❑ Hydric Soils and NO visible evidence of significant hydrological modification Remarks: Project Title: ,Tftf MxM CONCLUSIONS Delineator. F• G 3Jb4%5/A V s.w/e J Transect: 2 Dole: Aj/ lIkj S" ZOO, Plot: O Igbrh I YesNo YNo Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? ❑ IN Hydric Soils Criterion Met? ❑ © Yes No Wetland Hydrology Criterion Metz Q ® IS THIS DATAPOINT WITHIN A WETLAND? ❑ Remarks: PUBLiC HE~ SOUTH BURLIfi&ff - — -- DEVELOPMENT` RE- 5- ,Final plat applic�= ylEyygQAHfk.; tion #SD-01-33 of Homestead- D'esfgm, The South B, ,. Development'Et; . Inc. to amend a planned residential Board will, - development consis- lic hearing- a ,_ South -Burlin tiny of 1296 rvsideatia►- units and an t8 tk>fs Hall, Conies ' golf course, -Dorset Ream, 575 street. The amend- Street, South - ment consists of mlf ton, Vermont oa : nor modifications to day, July1$ 2001, at- decks, grading, build- for the Gish 7:30P.M. to cotrtli@ea:, the following; = rt ings, etc. Eagles project Park._ , Road. - 25 of Oingbin r ,.%YapI 6. Application #CU-01- i Wang seeklnq W7 23 of the Indbpendent Leased: proval under Section Wireless one 26.05, Conditlonaf Realty Corp.. seeking- Uses, and _ Sectio approval under Sec- 26.75, Accessory . R-ea- tion `26.05. Condl idential-: Ur".-, of the tional Uses, _ of Ilia South ton South Burlington ing Regttt Re'ing Regulatwna Re- quest ui fir J>earaae Quest is fo►-permis- sion-to:. 1}sioii, to ha" 'a 82 foot .tower, and 2} leisgVare -foal aa3ta'sstall ftee [31 0000:sort' residential uni antennas on a nfawr' 72 East Terrace tower, . 625 Nines' Road.- 2, Preliminaryy piayy� application #SO�t1334 7. Final at : appllw of Daniel l � i.d�V tion #SO-01 &2 to, O'Brien, p ice' amend a' previously Park - Realty Corp.- The approval planned unit consis- O'Brien Famillyj development Limited Partnership* for, 101 ting of 1j an 89 room building a 7i room a wait �IeNped ?J residential developp hoteF building. and31 275 seat restaurant. merit and a six [6]bt subdivision, Mines-' a The amendment con - burg Road and Ken- sists of adding addi- nedyDrive. tional, landscaping as, required by A& 250, 1 3. Application #C"I-'. Dorset Street. 21 of Crarg araf Gall Spain seeking 'don., 8. Applica*w #CU-01-'. tional use appraisal -I 22 of Indapen(teat under . Section 26 05 Wireless 'On* teased , Conditional Uses, - .q Realty Corp. seeking . Section 26.75, Accaa= ! conditional use ap- ,- sory Resident4ir proved from .Section. Units,.. of the South ' 26.05 of the South Burlington Zoning i Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request .I Regufations. Request is for permission to , is for permission to construct - a, - 51 2 r Instal three [3} anten- foot accas- nas�. oa cupola and ` :square cry residential unit, roof of Sheraton Inn, 1 Woodside DOve 870 Williston Road. 4_ Final plat applroa- I copes of. � ow apra`-�. tions for lion #SD 0131 of An are available tonio - Pomedeau ` to. public inspection at amend a planned unit', the South Burlington.:; Development consis- City Hal. 1 ti of ttKee 1. ings on 6.8 � , peter- John Dinklage, Chair-' , cel, 1519 Shelburne Road. The 4*66d• man ,{ South Burlington De- merit consists of coin= vv ee laodp m e n t Re v i ew I structing, a 129 square foot mechani- cal room for exf$" June 23, 2001 _ light manufacturing - use. f • A • Mal ` Or" jj ' ^ r � ` . i4 till - �`�, �•' lai ��`, `��A. of & Brien *omer FaM' Mahar 25.5 Acres `' e ��� 7♦ !;fir �..) �1 t - �j ' t v/ • 43.5 Acres Sketch Plan 1"=200' -Parking Requirements Analysis Phase A Coverages Existing Property Line use Required Total Spaces Total Spaces Co%wage Spaces Vidtor Total Units Required Provided ... u ritage of Area of Coverage Acres Total Acreage Total Acreage 19.1 100% Road Coeerage 4.36 22.8% ONE Building Coverage 2.06 10.8% 0 59 200' Sidewalk Coverage 0.69 3.6% Graphic Scale 1"=200' :Total Hard Coverage 7.1 37.26)6 .Green Space Coverage 12 ; 62.8% Phase A Density Calculations Aceeage Less Base Area of Lot 150/0 for Maximum Proposed Present Zoning in Acres Infrastructure Units Units R7 19.1 16.2 114 110 0'Be BmMem Pge y. INC. wewp..a•ras a.:nn P.Beay t�gt-00 O'Brien Home Farm swn e.nroc�v..�„os.m aaw•.«s:•sea•sw Phase A - Sketch Plan Residential 2 per dwelling 1 per 4 (Lot 1) unR dwelling units 46 104 119 Multi -Family Residential 2 per dwelling 1 per 4 (Lot 2) unit dwellin0 units 64 144 139 Context Plan 1"=400' Existing Property Line Proposed Property Line 50' 200' 800' 0 100, 400' Graphic Scale 1"=400' Phate A -Context Flan a O O O O O O O :97 � O ,� O 2K I F"I 166 0 1 F i— —0Q..m. arff�rmnw\ +9 Atv-r 26.5 Acres N D9n46Leo O'BWn 43.GWcT N -0'13 D.&S. Parcel 1 V L Re)mp1n1ng C7 C3 N, Subdivision Layout V=400' 50' 200' 800' 0 100, 400' Graphic Scale 1"=400' --- —-— — Existing PrLi Propose Property — -- --- --- --- d Property Line T. J. Boyle and Associates 0 'Brien Home Farm `� 77-7777-7777 11*�N