Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0119 Oakwood DriveFebruary 15, 1984 Mr. John Crabbe, Jr. P.O. Box 9416 South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 119 Oakwood Drive Dear John: Be advised the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment has granted your request for a zoning variance. Your proposal requires approval by the Planning Commission, I plan on scheduling you for Tuesday, February 28, 1984. The Zoning Board of Adjustment will issue formal findings at a later date. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg February 29, 1984 Mr. John Crabbe Jr. P.O. Box 9416 South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Crabbe: Be advised that the South Burlington Planning Commission has granted your request to develop a lot off the Oakwood Drive cul-de-sac with the use of a private driveway. Be advised that the driveway being private will not be maintained by the City. Be further advised that the design of the driveway must be according to the plan filed with this office. A permit is necessary to construct the proposed dwelling, along with one necessary for the sewer connection. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer eta/mc9 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance wih the South Bur- lington Zoning Requlcitiors and Chapter 1 17, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, February 13, 1984, of 5:00 P.M. to consider the following: 01 Appeal of Steve Whittlesey, Jeffrey Myers, agent seekm' p a variance, from Section 17.10, Permitted uses, traffic overlay district of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for per- mission to occupy an existing structure as a convenience store containing 4276 sgre feet of retail fk>or area, of 358 Dorset Street. 02 Appeal of Harald B. Bensen seeking a variance, from Section 11.10, Permitted uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Re- quest is for permission to con- struct twenty (20) residential units on a parcel containing 3.7 acres in conjunction with two existing office complexes, at 65 Potchen Road and I Executive Drive. #3 Appeal of John Crobbe, Jr. seeking a variance, from Section 18.10, Dimensional require- ments, subsection 18.104 of the South Burlington Regulations. Re- quest is for er pmission to con- struct a 30 h. x 45 ft. single family dwelling to within thirty- one (31) feet of Interstate 89, at lot N 119 Oakwood Drive. #4 Appeal of Mary Dumont, Frederick Blois, agent seeknmgg a variance, from Section 18.00, Dimeqireme Dimensional reunts of the South Burlington Regulations. Re- quest is for permission to convert on existing dwelling into a two family unit on a lot contaw+ing 10,1 1 O square feet at 2 Prouty Parkway. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer Jonuary 28, 1984 January 31, 1984 .;r. John Crable Jr. P.O. Box 9416 South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mir. Crable: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Hall Conference Room on Monday, February 13, 1984 at. 5:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Rivard Nard, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/fl)cg L . PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 28, 1984 by using a density of 7 on 2.85 acres of land, which would leave 37,026 sq. ft. for the office buildings. Mr. Mona wanted to see the acreages involved shown on the plan, but Mr. Poger noted that if this were treated as a PCD, there would be no lot lines. He asked whether the Commission felt these apartment units would be compatible with the area and no one objected to it. lie asked about the density, and Mr. Mona felt it was a lot of units. Mr. Benson said a percentage of the units would be reserved for people with 80'9A of the median income in the area. The units are suggested to be 900 sq. ft., mostly with two bedrooms. He hoped to have some elderly tenants. He noted that the location was close to a park and to all kinds of services within walking distance. The bus also runs near here. Mr. Benson noted that he had to have 15 units to make the project viable financially. He said that under VHFA, he would have the rentals at 8Z° of the market, locked in for 10 years. The details have not all been worked out yet. Mrs. Hurd came in at this point. Mrs. Maher said she would like the plan better without the first 4 unit building. It was noted that in case of parking overflow, the spaces for the office buildings would be available, especially at night and on weekends. Consider request o John Crabbe Jr. and Terry Ross to extend Oakwood Drive as private road per -c-tion-19.20 of the Zoning Regulations Mr. Crabbe noted that the sub -base was already existing to extend the road. Both drives would come off the existing Oakwood cul-de-sac and be private drives. Ross would have frontage on Glen Road and Crabbe on Oakwood Drive. Mr. Crabbe said he would plow his section of road. Per. Ward said there were 2 more lots there which would have to be served by this private drive if they were developed. Mr. Poger said there should be only 3 lots served by the private drive. Mr. Fiona wanted to see a better picture of the area, showing both houses. He felt the action the Commission would take tonight should be defined in one place. Mr. Poger saw no problem with the extension. Mrs. Maher moved to grant the request of John Crabbe, Jr., and Terry Ross to extend Oakwood Drive as a private road per Section 19.20 of the Zoning Regulations in order to serve lots 114 and 119. It is further stipulated that no more than a total of 3 lots shall be served off this private road extension of Oakwood Drive. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion, and it carried with Mr. Mona voting no. Site plan application of Alan Palmer for lot #36 Muddy Brook Industrial Park for construction of a 6,000 sq. ft. industrial building Mr. Ward said Mr. Palmer had been unable to make it back to the city for the meeting, and had requested a delay. Mrs. 14aher moved to continue the site plan application of Alan Palmer until March 13, 1984 at 7:30 pm at City Hall. Mr. Mona seconded the motion and all voted aye. Site plan application of LTH Associates, Inc., for lot #9 Bartlett ',Foods Development, construction of a 10,000 sq. ft. office complex Mr. Erik Davis said the building would have two floors and be under 35' tall. Some grading will be done on the site. It is planned to have professional offices in the building. 40 parking spaces are shown. The lot is heavily PRESENTATION PROCEEDURES FOR APPELLANTS TO THE SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT The Zoning Board Adjustment is a quasi -Judicial body empowered to hear appeals to the Zoning regulations. These regulations have the force an effect of law. It is the responsibility of you, the petitioner to present your documented arguments as to why the Board should grant a variance in your case. The Board has little discretionary power and each of the following five criteria must be met before the Board can grant a variance. Not one - three or four but all five of the following facts must be found by the Board before a variance can be granted. Please come prepared to present all the facts necessary for the Board to make an objective and intelligent decision. (Refer to Sec. 4468 of the Planning and Development Act of 1969 for further clarification). 1. That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; z. That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 3. That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 4. That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 5. That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. 0 4-k, > NOTICE OF APPEAL 1 �3 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BakRD OF ADJUSTMENT vName, address and telephone # of applicant __To 1i 01 C9fi6B6 IT7z, � G�r �Jc�, i (�p J(-� 1.)(.l.✓l.l��% rl1/i � V� W �d V'Name, address of property owner SAne As ,Ag"9, bProperty location and description 11� 041} LlJ1:10 _�✓Z ,Sa (3 uA/' I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to y the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. \ L 6 Hearing Date ignature of Ap ellant Do not write below this line ---------------------------=----------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on at (day of week) (month and date) time to consider the following: Appeal of Q rZsn.• .a�; seeking a AAIA4491"� from Section of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to _,e � A. 30 A IAJ t � M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 2/24/84 3) Bensen, 65 Patchen Read The area in question is zoned C-1 District. The site contains 3.7 acres with 145 feet frontage, approximately 2.8 acres has been set off for the proposed 20 residential units. The site is presently occupied with two office build- ings containing a total of 12,952 square feet. The minimum lot size for the district is 40,000 square feet with 200 feet front- age. Setting off 2.8 acres for the residential units will provide a balance of 37,026 square feet for the two buildings which represents a 17% lot coverage. The density proposed represents seven (7) units per acre, the density for the Patchen Road area is four (4) units per acre. Should the minimum lots be set off to accommodate the existing building (1.8 acres) the balance of the lot would be 1.9 acres, the maximum density ( 4 units per acre) would be 7.6 units. Section 11.00 purpose: states that "Commercial 1 District is hereby formed in order to encourage location of general retail and office uses in a compact central business area. Other uses that would benefit from nearby access to a central business area, including clustered residential development and small industrial employers, may be permitted if they do not interfere with access- ibility and continuity of the commercial district." Section 11.50 Planned Commercial Developments provides for multi -family dwellings as conditional uses. The minimum area, density and dimensional requirements are four (4) acres with a minimum frontage of 350 feet. At the February 13, 1984 Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting, members requested input from the Planning Commission, shall the Zoning Board consider this appeal under the permitted use section which prohibits residential use or shall they consider the request as a P.C.D. thereby requiring a area, density and dimensional waiver. 4) Crabbe & Ross,,lots 114 & 119 Oakwood Drive Section 19.20 of zoning regulations provides that "lots with no road frontage - permanent easement or r-o-w at least 20 feet in width is provided" may be approved by Planning Commission. Two lots in question set-off in 1950's. One lot would have had frontage on Glen Road (Ross) and other on Oakwood Drive (Crabbe). In both case lots are located off the existing Oakwood Drive cul-de-sac. The Ross lot involves the installation of a private drive twenty-four in width by 125 feet in length. Crabbe lot is also 24 feet wide by 150 feet in length. Crabbe has been granted a variance from the Interstate set back. Both drives are considered private drives and are not subject to City maintenance. An approval motion is necessary should the Planning Commission agree with this proposal. l� MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 2/24/84 4) Crabbe/Roses lots 114 & 119, Oakwood Drive These lots are a part of an old recorded subdivision which was never completed. If additional building is to take place the street should be completed across the entire frontage of the buildings lots and terminated with an adequate temporary turnaround or if there are no remaining lots a permanent turnaround built. A plan incorporating these lots into the remaining R-4 zoned area should be prepared. 5) Muddy Brook Industrial Park, Palmer Heights 1. Right turn (entrance) into driveway will be difficult unless curb radii is increased based on vehicles anticipated. An improved alignment would be plac- ing the entrance off center of the cul-de-sac. 2. A depressed concrete curb shall be constructed across the driveway entrance. 6) L.T.H. Office Building, Harbor View Road 1. The storm drain system should outlet to the northerly ravine instead of the street storm drain systems. Plan shows the easterly lot drainage connected to the sanitary sewer, this is prohibited. 2. Driveway entrance shall have a depressed concrete curb. 3. There is an existing sidewalk along the frontage of this property it should be shown on the plan. d Y7OYMN DM$AVYO - - is v rn r+ • a fit 9.LY 0 , Wd tip S v qd o a ci O7tU7Y f1 � L T � :71Y0 _ i'riJ8 AS NMrYa :AY 03AOYddV��^ w� �:ov�Y•,�1�p f �- — —I g - i - -- 4_- v- far - -- INDICATE NORTH DATE / R � �� JOB w1l"o, 2d M4 ff A fm 0 0 f iiii�i:is�iiiii�i��i:ii�ii:i�iiiii® e�a®�■■■®®■�����®�®®����■®®■ten CRABBE, John 119 Oakwood Drive Area zoned R-4 District & Conservation - Open Space District. Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements and density. Minimum lot size for two-family unit 12,000 square feet with 85 feet front- age. Existing lot 80' x 120' = 9,500 square feet. Proposed convert a 24' x 45' raised ranch into a two-family dwelling. Variance granted 2/13/84 (Section 18.104) set -back from I-89 permitting construction of a single-family dwelling. Private road access approved by Planning Commission 2/28/84. ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Reggulations and Chapter 117, Title 24,V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, June 11, 1990 at 7:00 pm. to consider the following: k1 Appeal of Gerald and Mary Pepin seeking a variance from Section 18.00 Dimensional re- quirements of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permis- sion to relocate an existing 24'x24' garage to within five (5) feet of the easterly side yard, at 9 Richard Terrace. Q Appeal of Wesco Inc., David Simendinger seeking apPproval from Section 19.65 Multiple uses of the South Bur- lington Regulations. Re- quest is for permission to operate a mini -mart (approximately 330 square feet) construct a 10'x40' storage area and operate a camper trailer rental business in conjunction with a two (2) bay service station on a lot containing ap- proximately 27,000 square feet, located at 1800 Williston Road. k3 Appeal of John H. Crabbe, Jr., seeking a variance from Section 18.00 Dimensional, den- sity requirements of the South Burlington Regu- lations. Request is for ., -.11 w convert an existing dwelling into a two-family dwelling on a lot containing 9600 square feet with 80 foot frontage located at 119 Oakwood Drive. Y4 Appeal of Bayview Old- smobile -Cadillac, Gerry Barker, agent, seeking a variance from Section 18.00 Dimensional re- quirements and Section 19.003 Extension of non -conforming uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to con- struct a 25'x60' addition to an existing autobody repair shop to within five (5) feet of an easter- Iy rear yard, at 1030 Shelburne Road. #5 Appeal of Susan Eaton and Thomas Pyle, agent, seeking a vari- ance from Section 18.00 Dimensional require- ments subsection 18.104 Interstate set- back of the South Bur- lington Regulations. Request is for permis- sion to construct a 30'x32' two -family dwelling to within thirty two (32) feet of the in- terstate 89 right-of-way, located at 115-117 Oak- wood Drive. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer May 26, 1990 120 ' m - ---- m 0 eq O lit DOWSTAIRS UTILITIES DINING KIT. BATH BEDROOA W LJ v LL CL. STORAGE r LIVING BEDROOA art I T pq0 G O p4 O w O DRIVEWAY 1�101 0 0 .S •. , • , •. , •. , •. •. •. , s. , •. A O pA O q 0 A O A O A O q 0 w 0 s 0 w 0 w 0 s 0 A O w 0 w 0 q 0 W Z 0 T- CL W J W f— N%-i u City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 TEL. (802) 658-7953 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER CHARLES E. HAFTER June 7, 1990 Fred Blais, Chairman Zoning Board of Adjustment City of South Burlington South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Fred: Upon review of the Zoning Board of Adjustment agenda of June 11, 1990, the City Council offers the following comments: 2. The appeal of Wesco, Inc. concerns the Council over the level of multiple uses that would exist on the property. 3. The appeal of Mr. Crabbe Jr. deserves attention over the amount of variance that would be required by the applicant. I also remind you that an existing non -permitted use does not create a "pre-existing" or "non -conforming" conditions. Sincerely, Charles Hafter City Manager CEH/peh SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in Iwhich the property is�locat d; i��'� � (2) That because of such physical circumsta4s kr conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship �as not been reated by the appellant; a (4) That the variance, if authorised, w113A not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the fariance, if atthorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date Appellant Appeal # gg 7d Vote: Yes No Sign( Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the n �Ighborhood or district in which the property islocated; 04 (2) That %ecause of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore nece�;spry to enable threasonab use o t property;yl C //%� _ ( 3 ) That such unnecessary fardship has not been dated C appellant; —L�i i�`Z�-� �.� _ taf (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent proper- , nor be detrimental to the public welfa p; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # �J Date In A/ 1 15�7 U Appellant Vote: Yes No Signer Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; V.L 4RJ pVC�x (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 1 Qu Ufifl (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detri to xj(.;,) t&K ktcx% 1� Jle n�� Ito the public welfare; �J _ ,kj� utA L L'7 �ln �.re �. . n11,0/ Jni (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. t�o0 �G / Appeal # Date `� CL Appellant �M� Vote: Yes No Sign Use Reverse side for additional fi ding SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the n ighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of t}-e property; / .i� /���� /Jc� ,� 3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the -DI-) appe11ant ; n /%i1/'1"Ij%l. ✓-) � w" , 't--4-A (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification po ble of the zoning regulations and of the plan. ` � M, /.,A /7)1 D /1// / . )-- Appeal #`' 4q ' I �C) Date �� �-0 Appellant Vote: Yes T No Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located;2 �� (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore ne ssary to f��able the ryas able se �,f7 the property; �i%' / Sz��6tii . _ � � / �'-, _ _ < (3) That such unnecessar harp h S � been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the pU welfare; I ////'' (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modific tion possi�ithe zoning regulations and of the plan. s1Jt71� d -•, Date - 1 A/ Appeal # ,� Appellant Vote: es = No Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; % (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. AIL /� Appeal # _ 3 Date v Appellant kZ Vote: Yes T N o 0 Si Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; k� / / ( f-f � n d f , P 1` x �, � ` y,aSc (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date Appellant _J C) hN 14 - CAA bbe .Y r- Vote: Yes r No Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings 7 5 lot 'It j • 1_j bi JL ,.I fl h nA,. 120 0 - --------- - ------ — -------- I IPA,; 0 :j 61".% ­:;x; 1. I.J 45 ' 0 * 11'1 Cr) L.LJ f-4 LU ... ... .............. . .. ....... . ........... E) R I \,'E'W A Y . . . . ... ..... ......... ......... .. . .... ....... . .. .... 9.4-irT: ............. .. ... It- 120 ' 0" eA ° t - ° UPSTAIRS 45 ' 0 y G o t ' BATH DINING KIT. 00 °aO oo BATH BEDROOM � W Ili Z p 4 O W t c\J � y4° LIVING RA ENT. BEDROOM i BEDROOM 3 D' p q O t - t - DRIVEWAY -pC0 y40 y40 y40 y40 y40 y40 y40 FAO y,p0 yG0 yp0 y40 y40 ll�IT e 10 &t. ,I F :4 . City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 May 29, 1990 Mr. John Crabbe, Jr. P.O. Box 9416 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Zoning appeal Dear Mr. Crabbe: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Municipal Offices, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, June 11, 1990 at 7:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this hearing. If you have any questions don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer 1 Encl RW/mcp City of _Juth Burlington Application to Board of Adjustment Date � c2�00 Applicant te'r7, C i1 '�Aa9E;ew —ea see, agent Address ?. L - �.. `tilt, 5. 0-4` Telephone # Landowner )ficial Use APPLICATION # HEARING DATE FILING DATE FEE AMOUNT E63-6i07 Address Location and description of property I ( 9 © A-k,3bosf bJ'I,e- Type of application check one ( ) appeal from decision of Administrative Officer( )request for a conditional use ( L—T request for a variance. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appeal a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Provisions of zoning ordinance in question Reason for appeal sec ,q� .� Le t+pr, The owner or applicant should submit along with this application (8 copies) plans, elevations, landscaping diagra aw o scale traffic data and any other additional informations wile erves wort evidence to the Board. Hearing Date ignature of Appel ant Do not wL below this line SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Day of Week Month and Date at to consider the following: Time Appeal of 1004 seeking af r om S e c t i o n �'+.�.c.r+- ., ." -s �- of the Sou Burlington Regulat ions. Request is for permission to, a_A_1 #00' oo�l 13P 4t l VERMONT TENT & CATERING SERVICES P.O. Box 9416 ,John H. Crabbe, Jr. South Burlington, VT 05401 (802) 863-6107 South Burlington Zoning Board South Burlington, Vt. 05403 Dear Sirs: I built 119 Oakwood drive in April 1984 with a partner, I lived upstairs and he down. This arrangement worked for 4 years until I remarried and moved out. I have been trying to sell since the fall of 1988, with no luck. The house is on the dead end of Oakwood and bordered by the thruway. This makes it undesirable for single family occupancy. I am requesting a variance from single family to duplex to allow me easy rentals and make the house marketable. I would need only modest interior changes with no new outside construction. Thank -you for your consideration in this matter. incer' l John H. Crabbe, Jr.