The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVR-87-0000 - Supplemental - 0073 Oakwood Drive (2)GUUi �URLINGTON "ZONING 130Ai:U U.' �JU.>'t':".:.:�'C Findings in accordance with Section 1+46P of the Plannin,r, & Dovelopment Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 2 (2) That because of such physical'eircumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property;11 (3) That such unnecessary2 hardship has no-t been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. ❑✓" Date 6 8 7 Appellant C? 1 LL Vote: Yes a- ho Q List "indin,;s below: 3 Appeal # C-19M? f S i �' __ -L SULIT )UH LiwrON Z014ING BOA ' D U! P Findings in accordance with Section 1446P of the Plannlnr �� f)��vclopmant Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is theref e necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; It s (3) That such unnecsary hardship has no-t been created by the appellant; F (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and2r (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. ET'� Da t e Appe Vote: Ye; M Li:t :ln,ln,, below:� No Q )peal SOUTI }URLINGTON ZONING BOA-:1) U.` )1l1S't':r .;:'l' Findings in accordance with Section 1446P of the i'1rjnninl� 1)� velo��m�nt Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or condition:;, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property Is located; S (2) That because of such physical 'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary(�j hardship has no-t been created by the appellant;_ 4 51 (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and-Ej (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. El Date /e7Fr-) Appellant al E: ?4 Vote: Yes No Q LJ ;'U !'1below: 1. C 1 (7 LI/ 3. Appeal S11-n___ �- v v ., SOU T 1 jUR L ING'1 ON ZONING I3OAI U O Findings in accordance with Section 1446E of the }'lr�nninl� `� 1)cvelopm��nt Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, Including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property;11 (j (3) That such unnecessary hardship has no-t been created by the appellant; ( 4ce if authorized ) That the variance, , will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (, Lz—j(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. , Date P— A I V iii - /Z Appellant Vote: Yes List !'indin;, , below: 1. 3. Appeal - -lie— -- — a--- /.4 // i GOUT )UR LINGTON ZONING BOA1, D U'.' `J UST ,--N 1' ^indings In accordance with Section 14.46i of the Planning <", DI'vclopment: Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; Lill (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (� (3) That such unnecessary hardship has no-t been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently Impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 1�r (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. EJ Appeal #, Da t e ulllye 't 11l i Appellant Z- Vote: Yes No Q SIFn��'_ Lis i; iin; s below: 1 . 464 h. --