Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-89-0000 - Supplemental - 0009 Newton Avenue;ie cl T I I I;IIN, I, I Nl;T(I N Its ),11t 1) I I .11 I':`II•.NT h• I lid I ftgs t is t.Ic :1 •11' the II Isms c !ir A 1►4 vI Iul,mc -nl A (I) that. the - rep are lift I clue! phys i en I <_ I reuucs tsane:cls or c:ori i t, I ons , ins:Iudiftg irregulurity, fill rrowness, or shell lowness o1, lot size or shape, or except ions.►1 topogrnhicaI or other physical condi tions pecul iIAI• to the particular property, and that. the uftnccessar•y hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of' the zoning regulations in the n,eighborh< dTor district in which the property is located; (2), That because 'of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary t e bl,e there opa le use, of t property; PAA-r t%rt �iV / (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by th appellant; ;tZ-A4k4- ("�Qelzre , 4 - "-" - (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental t h public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modific ion possible of', the zoning regulations and of/ t. h e plan.gin--- is If Dlk to Appellant Vote: Appea l Vt Yes 1 .1 No 1 .. Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings r �asS� � C ;;i �l 'I'Il Itliltl, I Nl;'1'cr!�' ,'.u`J I N�; Ire ��\I;I� � �I \I�.)t�ti'I'�il•:N'I ! r111 t II);` i I I r'<1r►II t I II 1 •1 f the I' I Bali i ti)' Il,•v(• I i)I,mirnl A t ( I) I•hat. Llte rcr It re ctn i clue; phys i c:ri I c. 1 rc•ums t.►nc:irs or cored i 1, i o n s inc:lkid iIIg i1-regulat-it}•, narrowness, or shut lowness of lot size or shape, or exce1)LionaI topogri►IticaI or other physical conditions peculiar• Lo Lhe particular property, itnd that. the unnecessary hardship is due Lo such conditions, and not. the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of' the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2). That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanentl} impair the appropriate use or development of' adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; ere,- di ., "i 4 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of' the zoning r(:gulat.ions and of the plan. U r► t e J✓h/. Appel [rant _7 Vote: YeNo Use Reverse side f'or additional Apper► t .. Sign findings ,If rt'I'II IiIJIt, i,IN(;T(I\ "..(I1J1141; Ii(IAI1 II (II \I,.It;;;•I,:II'.N'I I r ncl I ng,. r n Itc'c•(,I-dnnc c � I Lh ic t („r, d •! l�l{ r, C t.h, i' I r,r,ri i t i I„I) A t I ) I'ha L the rtr It re un I yutr phys i cc► I c, i rc tuns Lances or coed i 1. i ons , including ii•r•cguIItrit.y, nnrr•owness, or• spit) Iownctss of I o t size or sifape, or excepLionaI topogI- i►IficaI or other physiciI condi Lions pecul iar to the particular property, itnd that tht> unnecessary tin rdsh i p i s due to such cond i t i ons , rind not. the circumstances or conditions f generally created by the j % provisions othe zoning. regulations in the neigh�o dI�- district in which the property is to at.ed;-!/ F (2). That eca se 'of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore nec ssary to enable th reasonable use of the property; (3) That sucA'-unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; / f� F (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter Vhe essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate se or development of' adjacent propep-�y, geor be �trii�Yrj�al to t O ,public welfare;/J� / e (5) That the variance, ff authorized, 'will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief' and will represent the least modification pos • le of' the zoning regulations and ot' the plan. I) if t. Appal it it Vote: Yes No Use Reverse side t'or additional Appeal l 1 6— findings � I L -Iltll, ?e ti(rt 'I'll Itt11�I.I Nt;'fi)\' :O"J IN(; hOAII'I( ( )I- 1 nd 1 (rt; s 1 n 1 th Nf.(• t i O1( 1 •1 GH (( f' 1.Ity P I ruin 1 r(>' 1)(•�•e I Opm(-rlt \('t 1 1 ) 'I'll a L the r( +tie In 1 (Iu(r phys i (:a I c 1 r(•uni:<t.rn(:(rs; Or conrl i t. i o r I , inc:lkid irlg irregulitt-it.y, narrowness, or shitl Iouness of 1 o t size or shapt', or excepLionnJ t,opogrnhical or other physical condi tiOil s pec.11 it 1. to t_he pitrticuIitr property, it rid that the unnecessary hardship is due to such Condit_ions, anti not the t.-i rcurnstances or conditions general 1 y crew Led by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neig4borhogW or district in which the property is located; �J r, helu U/LNe�I. ©.Lh c & o r) (2), That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; L, rjrt,4 . N O r/ C�> Iry Yl.n•c r r.a A no A Gn n 11 etc.IS (_1 , in6�Lc�L Lal l eLA, %y►' 2 N hAIte (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; S Hv%Af-L er-)`u- S' r fs, 04Zk (3 !Gj,s ti�C-T1' (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent propert , nor be detrime tal to the public welfar D r► _ NO /'0 ) -- 19oly C-14A&. Ji iv+, No f. 2 4SrS C c e vY*VJ' (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulat.io s and of* the plan. V41,,i Appal 1)ii tf. -� ��� ��y Appel lant i� f�L' Mr C�./4►�L 1 0 �� Vote: Yes No . _ Sign 1 Use Reverse side for additional findings l [[till ilfl{�I,IN(;'1c�:A ^:IPJ[� I+,�•Ai(I� i'III•.N,I h [ n,I [ I 1 9 , , [ [i fi(''•�Irclnn,•,, �� t I.h t „[[ �I•II,H I t-lit• P I fill[, [fir, It,•�',•l,�i,ni,•nt ,\c t I ) fh;t t- th[ rt, ,t r-c un r cltJ phys r II ( : t rc umt; t,tII s; or c anti r t. i anti , IrWIkid IIIg ir-regulitrit.Y, nrtrruwncss, ur tihrtI lot -mess of lot. s r ze or siial>c , or except i onit 1 topog rrth [cal or other phys icit 1 conditions peculiitr to the pit rticuIitr property, it rid that. the unnecessary hrtrdsh i p i s ducr to such coed i t, i on , and not. the c.i rc:uins tances or con[ii t.rons gencraI ly created by the provisions of• the zoning; regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; t Ott PI-ACLW JA/ -fke oWL,4 P6tS1 J lotJ p�E oa3O so 17-/6- (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of' a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; &,x t= 11 4 /wd iQ ( i T_Y P Ar y /oo) C ff w(,,v (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; cal t L� u01 �'('�n. �i� G�� N� -��►2 (5) That the variance, it' authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of' the zoning regulations and of' t. h e plan. K 0 c - *E/- �. l�d�C_C/�17�{�l�l�'/4'% Appeal I)a tc Appel lant LW Vote: 1'es No 1_- Sign Use Reverse side for additional finding_ �r �t lll liili(i, I N1;'I't �i� ,''-r i^J I ;it; Its �,AI; I, � rl,11�.11;�;I''•il_tv'I� I r n�i 1 rr�'>; r ri nc'�•c�rdnn�'�• �: r t h ';�•� t t ��cr 1 11�i( ��! ! h�� I' I rirrri i ref Ire i I ��I,niin t �c� t ( I ) I'h;11. Cher m, rtr'cr un r clue phys i rtt I (: t rrums; Lanc�(rsc ctr ronci 1 t. t c>rI,; , Irncludtng irJ. gt)lrtriIt, Y narrown( ,ss, ur r;hrtl Iouriess cat' lot size or sirt,I)(- or exr_cpt_ i onn l Loltoy; r it icctl or other phys i ca l conch t.ions peculiar t.o the pit rticular property, itnd thrtt. the unnecessary hardship is due Lo such coedit.ions, and not the i rrums Minces or co rid i t. i or genera l 1 v crert Led 1) the I)I-ovisions of the zoning regulation,: in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; czll-a'• J q (G ,fe, ix' i°_�irc Glt� C.S �N p' Go)t�v1Tr2 . D �tcT vv`' 19PP L4 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; -CAKW JRyl GCJ- — 4k - (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; ,"I-4G/C'�>P DW,06f %- (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief' and will represent the least modification ossible of' the zoning regulations and of' the plan. d �A1A A e JS-- J W &"Z)14._ nor 3 CT or )-Zix� Appeal �ZKoo Appr-I I a n t 14666>t Vote: Yes No SIKn i Use Reverse side for additional findings