Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB-97-0000 - Supplemental - 0042 0044 Millham CourtC 4�� , / �Z/ llc�,5�7 a� g T /'✓ Y 5 0,eC— a� C7 b :5 o N 13t 5y' I , iI 1211 63' x W Single storey Frame Duplex Residence w `I � I 1 20'x22' I Frame Garage 2 Car I ,l s — 33 t — •� 33' --� t CO N L., "r 32 Vo `,o m .o %' 3 PIA �a /0 8 / 977 L.�.Alra s o J Lou_71a.ca or-PAmv M /4L M,.o,.A4 CovaT 50U rJO 78v4-71- 1 �-o., v,-. / SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in :cordance with Section 468 of the Pla6ning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the L provisions of the zoning regulations in the ige4ghborhood or dis kO''c i%y ich the pr pe ty is toeF /O A i i./O_ %//iv, . o /1, . Ye- (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable oe reasonab jm use of the pro er y, -'� (3) (4) That such That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential -character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adja nt property, nor be detyt�imental tyo th�tiblir elWe; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification Possible of Ahe zoning regulation and of the plan. Appeal 9 Date Appellant Vote: Yes No Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in zcordance with Section. .468 of the Pla6ning & Development Act (L) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the L provisions of the zoning regulations in the ne ghboEbood or district in which the property is located; 1�1 � , .✓ i �, 1% � t /JC � /��.�_„r ;a-� Qom' ��1� 1�� (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessarVo enable the reasonable a of the property; X ( 3 ) That such unn a sary fiards p SE t b¢ creat by tE appellant; n / (4) That the v lance, if aut rize , wi no alt the essential -character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, , nor bg,det;-3aena} to t public wel fre�. f' 41 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning lations y and of the plan. _ 1 Date Appellant Vote. f Appeal 9 / JI Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in zcordance with Section .468 of the Pla6ning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditiong.__pecull-war t� th particular property. and that __tk_� unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the i provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located;i�, T.. c--- r (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore neces ry D enabl� the,reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary ardship has not been er ated by the (� appellant; 1A, L tf a Y GVV4 VV- 1/\ w 10C r� v s % z e .e -e-�� .� (4) That the va iance, f L thorized, will not alter the essential -character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public w 1 fare; c' �d a fir, s WJ (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the . least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. i,CAX - i S til (-;' —\ r G t v /hj c C/,. — � R Q s ije owg� U/k d �... s' ` WZ4, �d d� �� 8e &I�'ry` Appeal Date "� A i�4 C �i 1 \ '�. 6i � Appellant I f1Zl S 411112 c Ef- �y1/�G1 OL' Vote: Yes No = Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings r .� � , cLG( SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in zcordance *rith Sectior. .468 of the Pla4ning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the 1- provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property, is located; /ti' o adplloy � � riv !0a(%�tv U.7,f2� (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, a_d&AoE there is no possibility that the property can be developed Gam„ in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonab a use of the property; ( 3 ) 4hat �sucTY necessary hardship has not been creaked by the appellant; ���-� ✓ate ��,�.�0. • �V (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in Which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the valriance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the . least modification possible f the zoning regulations and of the plan. % I. --yLv � r� �yf �C A W� V-!ZPw,-r g� A - AL *N /--e- �/� /d:/f/i1 / D / a Appea l t - �./UY� Date 3 !� Appellant l a- l Wiz- Zit a Vote: Yes � No = Sign _. Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in ccordance with Sectiol .468 of the Pla4ning & Development Act (1) (2) (3) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property. and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstaAces or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; That because of such phys cal circumstances or con itions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 17 i=y hardsIXY0 has not 'be'en created Ay the appellant;" - v (4) at the is,if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; /l/y� ' ' v !/ (5) That th ariance, f authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of ,the, plan. Date Appellant Vote: Yes Use Reverse side additional L City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 25, 1997 Mr. Louis Bouchard 40 Millham Court South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Zoning Application Dear Mr. Bouchard: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, March 10, 1997 at 7:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this meeting and be prepared to address the enclosed review criteria. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp 1 Encl SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Rulations and Chapter 11 eg' Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Mu- nicipal Offices, Confer- ence Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday March 10, 1997 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the fol- lowing: #1 Appeal of Louis & Janice Bouchard seeking a variance from Section 25.00 Dimensional re- quirements of the South Burlington Zoning Regu- lations. Request is for permission to construct a 12' x 30' enclosed porch to within seventeen (17) feet of the required front yard and one (1) foot of the southerly side yard, located at 40-42 Mil am Court. #2 Appeal of J.W.J. Re- alty,Gary Lavigne agent seeking a variance from Section 26.00 Noncon- forming uses, subsec- tion 26.003 extensions of the South Burlington Zoning Regulation. Re- quest is for permission to construct a 42' x 60' addition to an existing structure (approximately 8300 square feet) d.b.a. Saturn of South Burling- ton in conjunction with a second automobile deal- ' ership d.b.a. South Bur- lington Chrysler/Ply- mouth, on a lot i containing 5.3 acres, lo- cated at 1095 Shelburne Road. #3 Appeal of City of Bur- lington, J.J. Hamilton, Di- rector of Aviation seek- ing a variance from Section 25.113 Height of structure sub -section (D) front yard setback re- quirements of the South - Burlington Zoning Regu- lations. REquest is for permission to construct a three level parking ga- rage with a elevator tower at a height of thirty _ six feet nine inches (36'9") with a front yard setback of fifty (50) feet (required setback 51.9 feet) located at the Bur- lington International Air- port, 1200 Airport Drive. Plans are on file with the South Burlington Plan- ning and Zoning Office, - located at City Hall, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer February 22, 1997. City of South Burlington Application to B .-d of Adjustment; Off .cial Use APPLICATION # Date Applicant C.(j , C � -jail r'ce- /I ty hG Y'Q Owner, leasee, agent HEARING DATE FILING DATE FEE AMOUNT Address �� `7�17, �/�1� yt (� Telephone # Landowner Address Location and description of property -r r, /�� 5 %�a & a� �I (i r �7 ��� - Dle Type of application check one: ( ) appeal from decision of Administrative Officer ( ) request for a conditional use (-') request for a variance. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Ac:-'C.). Also that hearings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Provisions of zoning ordinance in questionz7ai/7Q � ��a ��✓►� �17 Reason for appeal The following documents are submitted in support of the application: Hearing Date Signature of A¢Oellan Do not write below this line ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on '000woq-' Day of Week /Q at 7,'00,-0 to consider the following: Month and Date time Appeal of ;0' seeking a from S e c t i onoej 'y U o of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is ssjfor permission to ��;.Yt..w�.•� �-7c..� � / J 0 O� O�' j„��-E. .�2,.�K...ce.-!�' �'-c: �` `,, �SL� �.t_ C� / I' .,1A O. I u, Z/ f2 2- I)ATP f/ -L n as I()R L INDICATE NORTH *71, C -L a -7 1 ■■■■■■■■■■1�■ NOON■■■ NOON■■■ aE■■■■■■E■i �Ee�NEEE�■■■■!� NOON■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■��■■■■■!■■■■■■■■ NOON■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■i■■■■■■ i��� NOON■ �■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■1�1■■EEN�■■■m■ o,N■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■��■■■■■■■c�■■■■e:■■■■■ IS ■■■1■■ mom ■■I il■��i®■iIQ■■■�■!�1F�1■■■■■ O■■■■■■EO■�A1■� ■■■■■■■■■■ 6Ii �fE■■■■ ■E■■■E■■E■1111111■■■ M mom ■■■■■■■■■EmmE ■ ■M■�lE�11: ■■■E! .:NOON■ ■■■■mEN■■■11E■���iiiiNii■©©©oiiE.�E■EEO NNONE l/mom Mr. ■EE■■■■ ■■■�■■ENOEIms ONE ■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■E■ ■ON E■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■ENEENE■E■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■E■E■EON�■-■EEOE■■NE/�■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■m Mml ■E■■E■m■■EEEEE■E ■ENEE■O■NEE■■■■■■■■■ MINN ME ■■■■■■■■■■■E■■■ENE■■/M■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■f/■■■■■■■■■■■ E■■■■■■■O ■■■■■■■■■ NONE MEN No E■■■E■■ ■ ■■■■■____ ■■■�.........Ei. .■ I i%�.-�y+�' ��' � �-°� %�..»G. �-ram-�».�.r��.�e-.::w _ .•'Z-�°",�' ,��'' , � d w Co //. f, .. G f 60