HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-04-61 SD-04-64 - Supplemental - 0596 Meadowland DriveTransmittal Cover Sheet
Detailed, Grouped by Each Transmittal Number
N\ E A G L E iY
U
�C H A 5 E�
CON 5 R U C T I O N C O P A N Y
Meadowland Business Park Project # 439 Neagley & Chase Construction
1150 Airport Drive Tel: 802-658-6320 Fax: 802-658-0349
PO Box 1150
South Burlington, VT 05407-2283
D. 164 0064
Ray Belair
South Burlington Planning and Zoning
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tel: 802/846-4106
Fax:
❑ Acknowledgement Required
Review
001 1.00 Drawing
002 1.00 Drawing
Irene Daigle, Office Manager
Neagley & Chase Construction Co., Inc.
1150 Airport Drive
PO Box 2283
South Burlington, VT
05407-2283
Tel: 802-658-6320
Fax:802-658-0349
Hand
PUD Plat New
Worksheet New
Ray:
Above is sent at the request of Mark Neagley, for your review.
Irene Daigle
Prolog Manager
Signature
Printed on: 11/15/2004 PM6Database
J kty
Signed Date
Page 1
DUAL OBLIGEE RIDER TO PERFORMANCE BOND Bond 6102260
WHEREAS, Heretofore, on or about the \ 0L>— day of ,&9-r&xA-Q 0C.- , m2001 ,
Munson Earth -Moving Corporation, unpike goad, Williston, VT 05495,
hereinafter referred to as Principal, ontered into a written agreement with
Summer/Ice Joint Venture, Inc., Burlington, , hereinafter referred to as Original Obliges,
for the construction of Road at Meadow and Business Park in South Burlington, VT
, and
WHEREAS, the Principal and the GENERAL Insurance Company of Amer", a Washington Corporation, as Surety,
executed and delivered to the Original Obligee their joint and several Performance Bond, and
WHEREAS, The City of South Burlington, Vermont , hereinafter
referred to as Additional Obligee, has requested the Principal and Surety to join with the Original Obligea in the execution and
delivery of this Rider, end the Principal and Surety have agreed so to do upon the conditions herein stated.
NOW THEREFORE, in cor�rideration of one dollar and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is
acknowledged, the undersigned agree that the said Performance Bond shall be, and is, amended as follows:
1. The name of The City of South Burlington, Vermont _ as
Additional Obligee, shall be added to sal nd as a naro o ,gee.
2. The rights of Additional Obligee as a named Obligee shall be subject to the condition preeodent that the
Original Obligee's obligations under the contract be performed,
3. The aggregate liability of the Surety under said bond to the Original Obligee and Additional Obligea, as
their interests may appear, is limited to the penal sum of the said bond.
4. The Surety, as its option, may make any payment under said bond by check issuod jointly to the
Original Obligee and Additional Obligee,
S. The purpose of this Rider is to add an Additional Obligee only and is not intended to affect or alter the
terms and conditions of this bond.
Signed, sealed and dated this to day of , 1% 20QJ
S r/Ic J ttent e nc.
(Seal if corporation) By:
Attest Or inal Obligee
By
(Seal if corporation)
Attest
ILCM0 is •A1WT[--u.•s--
C
By y
GEN hSURAN CO ANY OF AMERICA
M11 i alit Vex Planck, t -in-Fact
rth-MovKq Covilv ati
Q Reg;sterel Ttaoern8n of SAPtCO Corporation
S-21e5rED 7/flf
P?90 1 of 2 PRINTED IN U.S.A.
PLRFORMANCE BOkD
Conforms with The American Institute of Architects Bond # 610MO
AIA Document A312
Any singular reference to Contractor, Suety, Owner or other party shall be considered plural where applicable.
CONTRACTOR (Name and Address):
MUNSON EARTH -MOVING CORPORATION
85 Shunpike Road
Williston, VT 05495
OWNER (Name and Address);
SUMMER/ICE JOINT VENTURE, INC.
1150 Airport Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
CONSTRUCTION CON- RACT
SL'RETY (Name and Principal Place of Business). -
GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
MILI,ENIUM CORPORATE PARK
BLDG. C
18400 NE UNION HILL ROAD
REDMONTD, WA 98052
Date:
Amount. ($1,694,726.00)-One Million Six Hundred Ninety Four Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty Six Dollars & No/100ths
Description (Name and Location): Construction of road at Meadowland Business Park in South Burlington, Vermont
BO:vTI)
Date (Not earlier than Construction Contract Date):
Amount: ($1,694,726.00)-One Million Six Hundred Ninety Four Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty Six Dollars & No/100ths
Modifications to this Bond:
® None ❑ See Page 2
CONTRACTO P CIPAL SURETY
Company: M RTH-MOV rporare Sea]) G RAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AIvIERICA
.P ION
(Seal)
:Fame and0ritle: � 0. 0,,
(Any additional signatuu:es appear page 2.)
(FOR IIdFOR* SATION ONLY - Name, Address and
Telephone) AGENT or BROKER -
THE ROWLEY AGENCY, INC.
P.O. Box 511, Concord, NH 03302-0511
1 The Contractor and the Surety, jointly and severally, bind
themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and
assigns to the Owner for the performance of the Construction
Contract, which is incorporated herein by reference.
2 If the Contractor performs the Construction Contract, the Surety
and the Contractor shall have no obligation under this Bond, except to
participate in conferences as provided in Subparagraph 3.1.
3 If there is no Owner Default, the Surety's obligation under this
Bond shall arise after:
3.1 The Owner has notified tlx Contractor and the Surety at its
address described in Paragraph 10 below that the Owner is
considering declaring a Contractor Default and has requested and
attempted to arrange a conference with the Contractor and the
Surety to be held not later than fifteen days after receipt of such
notice to discuss methods of performing the Construction
Contract. If the Owner, the Contractor and the Surety agree, the
Contractor shall be allowed a reasonable time to.
Name and Title: VIAliam Vet'Planck, Attorney -In -Fact
OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE (Architect, Engineer or other
ply):
perform the Construction Contract, but such an agreement
shall not waive the Owner's right, if any, subsequently to
declare a Contractor Default; and
3.2 The Owner has declared a Contractor Default and
formally terminated the Contractor's right to complete the
contract. Such Contractor Default shall not be declared
earlier than twenty days after the Contractor and the Surety
have received notice as provided in Subparagraph 3.1; and
3.3 The Owncr has agreed to pay the Balance of the
Contract Price to the Surety in accordance with the terms of
the Construction Contract or to a contractor selected to
perform the Construction Contract in accordance with the
terms of the contract with the Owner.
4 When the Owner has satisfied the conditions of Paragraph 3,
The Surety shall promptly and at the Surety's expense take one of
the following actions:
S•1859/GIEF 10r99 Page 1 of 2
4.1 Arrange for the Contractor, with--nseni of the Owner, to
perform and complete the Constructioi atract; or
4.2 Undertake to perform and complete the Construction
contract itself, through its agents or through independent
contractors; or
4.3 Obtain bids or negotiated proposals from qualified
contractors acceptable to the Owner for a contract for
performance and completion of the Construction Contract,
arrange for a contract to be prepared for execution by the
Owner and the contractor selected with the Owner's
concurrence, to be secured with performance and payment
bonds executed by a qualified surety equivalent to the bonds
issued on the Construction Contract, and pay to the Owner the
amount of damages as described in Paragraph 6 in excess of the
Balance of the Contract Price incurred by the Owner resulting
from the Contractor's default; or
4.4 Waive its right to perform and complete, arrange for
completion, or obtain a new contractor and with reasonable
promptness under the circumstances:
1 After investigation, determine the amount for which
it may be liable to the Owner and, as soon as
practicable after the amount is determined, tender
payarent therefor to the Owner; or
2 Deny liability in whole or in part and notify the
Owner citing reasons therefor.
5 If the Surety does not proceed as provided in Paragraph 4 with
reasonable promptness, the Surety shall be deemed to be in default
on this Bond fifteen days after receipt of an additional written notice
from the Owner to the Surety demanding that the Surety perform its
obligations under this Bond, and the Owner shall be entitled to
enforce any remedy available to the Owner. If the Surety procccds
as provided in Subparagraph 4.4, and the Owner refuses the
payment tendered or the Surety has denied liability, in whole or in
part, without further notice the Owner shall be entitled to enforce
any remedy available to the Owner.
6 After the Owner has terminated the Contractor's right to complete
the Construction Contract, and if the Surety elects to act under
Subparagraph 4.1, 4.2, or 4.3 above, then the responsibilities of the
Surety to the Owvcr shall not be greater than those of the Contractor
under the Construction Contract, and the responsibilities of the
Owner to the Surety shall not be greater than those of the Owner
tinder the Construction Contract. To the limit of the amount of this
Bond, but subject to corrunitment by the Owner of the Balance of
the Contract Price to mitigation of costs and damages on the
Construction Contract, the Surety is obligated without duplication
for:
6.1 The responsibilities of the Contractor for correction of
defective work and completion of the Construction Contract;
6.2 Additional legal, design professional and delay costs
resulting from the Contractor's Default, and resulting from the
actions or failure to act of the Surety under Paragraph 4; and
6.3 Liquidated damages, or if no liquidated damages are
specified in the Construction Contract, actual damages caused
by delayed performance or non-performance of the Contractor.
MODIFICATIONS TO THIS BOND ARE AS FOLLOWS:
7 The Surety shall -t be liable to the Owner or others for
obligations of the Cora! or that are unrelated to the Construction
Contract, and the Balance of the Contract Price shall not be reduced
or set off on account of any such unrelated obligations. No right of
action shall accrue on this Bond to any person or entity other than
the Owner or its heirs, executors, administrators or successors.
8 The Surety hereby waives notice of any change, including
changes of time, to the Construction Contract or to related
subcontracts, purchase orders and other obligations.
9 Any proceeding, legal or equitable, under this Bond may be
instituted in any court of competent jurisdiction in the location in
which the work or part of the work is located and shall be instituted
within two years after Contractor Default or within two years after
the Contractor ceased working or within two years after the Surety
refuses or fails to perform its obligations under this Bond,
whichever occurs first. If the provisions of this Paragraph are void
or prohibited by law, the minimum period of limitation available to
sureties as a defense in the jurisdiction of the suit shall be
applicable.
10 Notice to the Surety, the Owner or the Contractor shall be
mailed or delivered to the address shown on the signature page.
11 When this Bond has been furnished to comply with a statutory
or other legal requirement in the location where the construction was
to be performed, any provision in this Bond conflicting with said
statutory or legal requirement shall be deemed deleted herefrom and
provisions conforming to such statutory or other legal requirement
shall be deemed incorporated herein. The intent is that this Bond
shall be construed as a statutory bond and not as a common law
bond.
12 DEFINITIONS
12.1 Balance of the Contract Price: The total amount payable
by the Owner to the Contractor under the Construction
Contract after all proper adjustments have been made,
including allowance to the Contractor of any amounts received
or to be received by the Owner in settlement of insurance or
other claims for damages to which the Contractor is entitled,
reduced by all valid and proper payments made to or on behalf
of the Contractor under the Construction Contract.
8-16591GIEF 10/99 Page 2 of 2
12.2 Construction Contract The agreement between the
Owner and the Contractor identified on the signature page,
including all Contract Documents and changes thereto.
12.3 Contractor Default: Failure of the Contractor, which has
neither been remedied nor waived, to perform or otherwise to
comply with the terms of the Construction. Contract.
12.4 Owner Default: Failure of the Owner, which has neither
been remedied nor waived, to pay the Contractor as required by
the Construction Contract or to perform and complete or
comply with the other terms thereof.
W S A F EC 0-1 POWER
OF ATTORNEY
SAFFr'r) INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
GEJ . INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
HQPM- .r-FICE: SAFECO PLAZA
SEAME, WASHINGTON 9i185
No. 9595
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS:
That SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, each a Washington corporation, does each hereby
appoint
....... a. 11'DANIF_L E. CHURCH; PAULA J. CA-N•TARk JOHN P. TMSfENY; 1t'II„LL10,I vER PLANCY, REONDA J. CONNOR; Concord, New 11vqbim .........� •••
its true and lawful attomey(s)•in `act, 0t full authority to exeate on its behalf fidelity and surety bonds or undertakings and other documents of a similar character
issued in the course of Rs business, and to bind the respe,-Ve company thereby.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA have each executed and
attested these presents
this I ]ih
R.A. PIERSON, SECRETARY
CERTIFICATE
day of May 1999
V1 g&4wo
W. RANDALL STODDARD. PRESIDENT
Extract from the By -Laws of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
and of GENERAL_ INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA:
-Article V, Section 13. - FIDELITY AND SURETY BONDS ... the President, any Vice President, the Secretary, and any Assistant Vice President eppohted for that
purpose by the officer in charge of surety operations, shag each have authority to appoint individuals as attorneys -In fact or under other appropriate titles with authority to
execute on behalf of the company fidelity aril surety bonds and other documents of simllar character issued by the company in the course of its business... On any
instrument making or evidencing such appointment, ttv signatures may be affxed by facsimile. On any Instrument conferring such authority or on any bond or
undertaking of the company, the sea!, or a facsimile thereof, may be Impressed or affixed or In any other manner reproduced; provided, however, that the seal shag not
be necessary to the validity of any such instrument or undertaking.'
Extract from a Resolution of the Board of Directors of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA adopted July 28, 1970.
"On any certificate executed by the Secretary oran ass'�ant secretary of the Company setting out,
(i) The provisions of Article V, Section 13 of the By -Laws, and
01") A copy of the powerofattomey appointment, executed pursuant thereto, and
(in) Certifying that said power-6"nomey appointment is in full force and effect.
the signature of the certifying officer may be by facsimile, and the seal of the Company may be a facsimile thereof."
I, R.A. Pierson, Secretary of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and of C-ENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, do hereby certify that the
foregoing extracts of the By -Laws and of a Resolution of the Board of Directors cf these corporations, and or a Power of Attorney issued pursuant thereto, are true and
correct, and that both the By-t-aws, the Resolution and the Power of Attorney are still in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 twve hereunto set MY hand and affixed the facsimiie seal of said corporation
SEAL
dui 1953
S-097USAEF 7M
this
day of .n ptarber 2001
=EA
L
00f W �''t�' R.A. PIERSON, SECRETARY
® Registered trademark of SAFECO Corporation.
511 im POF
Bond No SK3978
LANDSCAPING BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT, NeWley & Chase Construction Company ,
as Principal, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the
City of South Burlington as Obligee, in the full and just sum of
FoM-Seven Thousand Four Hundred and 00/100----- Dollars for the payment of which sum, well and truly to be
made, the said Principal and Surety bind themselves, and their respective heirs, administrators, executors, successors
and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS, the Principal has contracted to construct specified landscaping at
Meadowland Business Park
as described in the specifications.
And, Whereas, Principal is required to provide security in the amount of
For y-Seven Thousand, Four Hundred and 00/100------------------------------------------------------------------- DOLLARS
($47,400.00). as performance guarantee that such work will be performed in accordance with the Site Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that, if Principal shall faithfully perform such work in
accordance with the aforementioned Site Plan, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force
and effect for a period of three years from September A 2001 thru September 16, 2004
Signed, sealed, and dated this 10th day of September , 2001
Witness:
Witness:
Neagley & Chase Construction Co.
By (Seal)
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
ORA. ME ell I W
Scott F. Boardman Attorney -in -Fact
TheStftl
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Seaboard Surety Company
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company
Power of Attorney No. 22680
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
Certificate No. 9 19 8 5
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Seaboard Surety Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York, and that
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company are corporations duly organized under
the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, and
that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Iowa, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance
Underwriters, Inc. is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin (herein collectively called the "Companies"), and that the Companies do
hereby make, constitute and appoint
I. Munn Boardman, III, Richard S. Smith, Scott F. Boardman, Paul E. Plunkett, D. Michael Boardman and Brenda Schill
Burlington
Vermont
of the City of State _ their true and lawful Attomey(s)-in-Fact,
each in their separate capacity if inure than one is named above, to sign its name as surety to, and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, undertakings,
contracts and other written instruments in the nature thereof on behalf of the Companies in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons, guaranteeing the
performance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings required or permitted in any actions or proceedings allowed by law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused this instrument to be signed and sealed this 9th day of
August
2001
Seaboard Surety Company United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company
St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company
SDFFIY k �„N,IMJ•G9 p!;'xs�yq 4�,�StY,QyD C p�tTY�'O? !' ��Zr���
* j i P pOR
Cd�l\lE �it0 ry Aif.�, Z cOp Alf:,., �i � per,,,,_ MCQQ�D�i1iED
N�192 � �O ;SEAL o'J �d.:SBaiLj� ` N1.8-9^6Nep � 19%% � � 1951 t I
OFPfcW fS * f• afaw A� t� ... �,. �,�� Att�dF 'a/i tt� ''��/f/ r
f IOYw.eP/, C ,
State of Maryland
City of Baltimore THOMAS E. HUIBREGTSE, Assistant Secretary
On this 9th day of August 2001 before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared John F. Phinney and
Thomas E. Huibregtse, who acknowledged themselves to be the Vice President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of Seaboard Surety Company, St. Paul Fire and
Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and
Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.; and that the seals affixed to the foregoing instrument are the corporate seals of
said Companies; and that they, as such, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained by signing the names of the
corporations by themselves as duly authorized officers.
EAAfor
In Witness Whereof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. m pV SS
e(!Q
i
My Commission expires the 13th day of July, 2002. �
9E CiTV
REBECCA EASLEY-ONOKALA, Notary Public
86203 Rev. 7-2000 Printed in U.S.A.
This Power of Attorney is granted under and by the authority of the following resolutions adopted by the Boards of Directors of Seaboard Surety Comp St. Paul
Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty ompany,
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. on September 2, 1998, which resolutions are now in full force and
effect, reading as follows:
RESOLVED, that in connection with the fidelity and surety insurance business of the Company, all bonds, undertakings, contracts and other instruments relating
to said business may be signed, executed, and acknowledged by persons or entities appointed as Attomey(s)-in-Fact pursuant to a Power of Attorney issued in
accordance with these resolutions. Said Power(s) of Attorney for and on behalf of the Company may and shall be executed in the name and on behalf of the
Company, either by the Chairman, or the President, or any Vice President, or an Assistant Vice President, jointly with the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary,
under their respective designations. The signature of such officers may be engraved, printed or lithographed. The signature of each of the foregoing officers and
the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any Power of Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Attomey(s)-in-Fact for purposes
only of executing and attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and subject to any limitations set forth therein, any
such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company, and any such power so exe-
cuted and certified by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company with respect to any bond or undertaking to which
it is validly attached; and
RESOLVED FURTHER, that Attomey(s)-in-Fact shall have the power and authority, and, in any case, subject to the terms and limitations of the Power of
Attorney issued them, to execute and deliver on behalf of the Company and to attach the seal of the Company to any and all bonds and undertakings, and other
writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such instrument executed by such Attomey(s)-in-Fact shall be as binding upon the Company as if signed by an
Executive Officer and sealed and attested to by the Secretary of the Company.
I, Thomas E. Huibregtse, Assistant Secretary of Seaboard Surety Company, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company,
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance
Underwriters, Inc. do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Power of Attorney executed by said Companies, which is in full force
and effect and has not been revoked.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand this 11 th day of September 2001
Thomas E. Hu�tbre.�g!/t(s�e/'
�, Assistant Secretary
O /�.QQ
To verify the authenticity of this Power of Attorney, call 1-800-421-3880 and ask for the Power of Attorney clerk. Please refer to the Power of Attorney number,
the above -named individuals and the details of the bond to which, the power is attached.
C
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PI ANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
April 20, 2005
Ian Jewkes
Krebs & Lansing .
164 Main Street, Suite 201
Colchester, VT 05446
Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings
Dear Mr. Jewkes:
Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the February 15, 2005
Development Review Board meeting.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Betsy' nou h
Y g
Administrative Assistant
Encl.
i
( Lam (jj.r � Ca
DEVELOPMENT RENEW BOARD
15 FEBRUARY 2005
Mr. Belair suggested continuing the hearing and letting the applicant revise the plan so
the DRB knows what it is approving.
Mr. Boucher moved to continue Site Plan Application #SP-05-01 of Friendly Ice Cream
Corp. until 1 March 2005. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
6 Public Hearing: Reconsider preliminary plat application #SD-04-61 and final
plat application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings for a planned unit
development consisting of. 1) construction of a 26,000 sq. ft. distribution and
related storage building with more than 15% GFA in office use for the same
tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no -
construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the
south located at the end of Dubois Drive:
Mr. Dinklage noted receipt of a letter from the applicant's attorney asking for a
continuance due to legal issues.
Mr. Boucher moved to continue reconsideration of Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-
61 and Final Plat Application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings until 5 April
2005. Mr. Kupferman seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
7. Continued sketch plan application #SD-04-90 of Diemer Properties, LLC for
a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing a 16 room motel and
single family dwelling, 2) constructing a 6000 sq. ft. retail/office building, and
3) constructing a 14 unit multi -family dwelling, 490 Shelburne Road:
Mr. Llewellyn noted that the Board had requested that there be only one curb cut on
Bacon Street, and that has been dgne..
The building would be a "pass -through" building with parking underneath to serve the
residential use. The other parking lot will serve the retail. They may come back with a
shared parking request, depending on the use of the building.
Mr. Llewellyn showed the location of landscaping.
There is a question of Bacon Street becoming a public street. Mr. Robertson explained
this is an Act 250 issue. Eric Farrell has said he would address this in a few weeks.
Mr. Kupferman asked about the rear yard setback. Mr. Belair said there are 2 front yard
setbacks and 2 side yard setbacks.
Mr. Dinklage noted the applicant is committing to building essentially what has been
shown. He asked them to make the ends of the building nice looking because they will
be visible from Shelburne Road.
-3-
i
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO
t
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
April 1, 2005
Ian Jewkes
Krebs cis Lansing
164 Main Street, Suite 201
Colchester, VT 05446
Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings
Dear Mr. Jewkes:
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting
and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting
on Tuesday, April 5, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575
Dorset Street.
If you have any questions, please give us a call.
Sincerely,
Betsy McDonough
Administrative Assistant
Encl.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
To- South Burlington Development Review Board
From: Brian Robertson, Associate Planner y r
Date: April 1, 2005
Agenda #3, CU-04-15, Garret and Lisa Huyer
Staff has not received any additional information for this project since the original
meeting. If no additional information is submitted by the meeting on April 5, 2005, staff
recommends denying this application.
Agenda #4, VR-04-02, George Hubbard
The applicant has requested a continuation of this application to a future date. Staff
suggests that the Development Review Board continue this application to the May 3,
2005 meeting.
Agenda #5, SP-05-01, Friendly Ice Cream Corporation
Staff has not received any additional information for this project since the original
meeting. If no additional information is submitted by the meeting on April 5, 2005, staff
recommends denying this application.
Agenda #6, SD-04-61 and SD-04-64, Spencer Terminal Holdings
Staff has been in contact with the applicant regarding this project, and it appears that
the applicant will be withdrawing its request for reconsideration of the original approval.
Enclosed is a confidential letter from the City Attorney regarding this request for
reconsideration.
AFr-05-20015 Lo.01 ,i; 43l_E Q:CD-ASE 80265,
ph*&.: (802) 8784375
iax(BO'Z}898-96T �
MEMORANDUM:
Datc. April 5, 2003
From: Ian A. 1eu-kes
To: Ray Helair
City of South Burlington
Re: Notice of Withdrawal of Application: Spea-,er Termiral Holdings Approval
SD-04-61 and SD-04-64
Meadowland 1ndustrW Park
Summer Ice and Dubois Property
South Burlington, Vermont
Dear Ray:
We are writing to officially wiOdraw our application for tix above referenced matter. Both dark Neagley,
of Summer Ice Joint Venture, and Bill Spencer, of Spencer Terminal holdings, are signing this
memorandum to acknowledge their concurrence.
Thank you,
}mot A. lowing
x IWO van tors
xt�uasl �aldmgr
7iJ-NL F.Clt-
APR-05-2005 16-'01 / UEAGLEY&CHASE CONSTR ,502~580349 P.01-'02
t N It A G L E Y
a
H A 3 t
GO�TIOIt COY AwY
FAX
TO: ' ' t �C �tK Fax: S ��in ' G i
FROM: i u% c i�t S� _ [8021658-6320 Ext. i `t� {VOICE]
1802165&0349 (FAX]
RE
REMARKS:
D veme— 4-01�
P.O. Box 2283. South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2283
PAGES WILL FOLLOW THIS PAGE...
STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
171 BATTERY STREET
P.O. BOX 1507
BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507
(802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD)
STEVEN F. STITZEL
FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119
PATTI R. PAGE*
WRITER'S E-MAIL(ALAFFERTY@FIRMSPF.COM)
ROBERT E. FLETCHER
WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-2552
JOSEPH S. McLEAN
TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE
AMANDA S. E. LAFFERTY
(*ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y)
April 7, 2005
Jacalyn Stevens, Clerk
Environmental Court
2418 Airport Road
Barre, VT 05641-8701
Re: Appeal of Greco
Docket No. 12-1-05 Vtec
Dear Jackie:
JILL E. SPINELLI
WILL S. BAKER
In connection with the above -referenced matter, enclosed
please find the Notice of Withdrawal of the applications that are
the subject of this appeal.
Please call with questions. Thank you.
Sincerely,
vvl'ovvl
Amanda S. E.
ASEL/br
son5676.cor
Enclosure
CC: Raymond Belair/
Joseph and Mary Greco
David and Heather Main
Kenneth W. and Joanne Perkins
Peter E. and Leslie Black Plumeau
Paul and Cheryl Houchens
Donna Lee
Diane Naomi Roen
A
Laffert
30��5e07 49 F E_' '
co i�A1t�CSW.L� t vl--vu
MEMORANDUM -
Date: April 5, 2003
From: Ian A. lewkes
To: Ray Heiair
City of South Bu:ling-ton
Re: Notice of Withdrawal of Application: Speaucr Terminal Holdiogs Approval
SD-04-61 and SD-04-64
Meadowland lndusniai Park
Surnmer Ice and Dubois Property
South Burlington, Vermont
Dear Ray
We are writing to officially withdraw our application for the above referenced matter, Both IMAr1 Neagley,
of Sltianner Ice joint ;V entux, aria Dui Spciicez' of SSPcn=r Tu—.-i=1 HcO.-d fiS, ."tire sibui.^.�,' rhi5
memorandum to acknowledge their concurrence,
Thank you,
1= 7e4=5
I=JoiO Vu:t=
T07PL P.0
3
SWI�SEttYM'FIAW'-----��
i M
SPENCER TERMINAL
Corporate Headquarters
SOUTH B URLING TON, VERMONT
INDEX.-
Sheet
SP-1
Site Plan
Sheet
SP-2
Utility Plan
Sheet
SP-3
Grading Plan
Sheet
SP-4
Landscape Plan
Sheet
SP-5
Lighting Plan
Sheet
A-1
Elevations
Sheet
D-1
Details
Sheet
D-2
Details
Sheet
D-3
Details
RECEIVED
AUG 12 2%g'!
City of So. Burlington
AvN "Y 74 1QN
P-ftcr asaze .......
AR -PBS & zd/ysmC 164 Alain Street
Consultzng_ Colchester
Engineers Inc. Vermont 05446
849.e-87B-9975
--
I � 1 Delr/oPmen4 LTD. - -
I p� Lot 7 _ 1
9 I or I", ,foktt Venture _ - - -----,
—. _ ' SIM // ,�--wee 6 PAC •e= 1 -- °- - - - _ — — �----
- 1 �aras
1
36
459, ._---- —
Ste_ �-
Fxtenstan
W I
yyt/t Shad --8-
-- -. N/i
O— Acn+4 /nc
-�'. d ` zoo p .,•
.Lggi---------------- (...— -y------ ------ ---`
1
Lot 2
IA
Munson Earth
! 't
47
1
Is � � S)'7E
proposed
Location Mao w 1 a=
t PJ4 1 1 le.f. nM .A W�
l71meY /nfwmot/on: � So
\ Summer /ce ✓o/nt Ventura •I e
153 Summit Street
South Burtkigtan, VT 05404 Nyf=
(802)-658-6320 1 6hw Aa'sx /x
AOD/katt /nfh7wtkvL Co-AMIko7t /nfumotAw 1
Spencer Term/nof Holdings, L.L.C. Homer & Marie Dubois I
l S �1: O P� ♦/O. Box 50JAmC Swth Buq m, Vr 05403
- ( *Yli ton, VT 05495 (801)-862-8687 N
1 I �•� ( (802)-663-5062 ♦♦
Summer /ce ✓tre Venture
Lot 3 153 Summit 1
1 _, �_,,._.�- -+ �1 �.•�,♦ \` i t-,
Summer /ce Joint Ventut'e a1 ,ry
ai�a � � � � ♦ ` Areo=20.2 acres South Budmgto2
12o10' (802)-658-6320 �I 7 �A 1 /ndustMW and Open, Spaoe -7-,hg District
g 1
�.� . Arras:
Total oma = 20.2 acres Q
�------ �, Proposed Lot tbmmy - Lot S1.•
ahw i wame New Bu//dmgs 26; 000 a em-. ` 29.5 �.
New �Parking & Roods = rzgzae ,r. = 14.7T emaiz ,� _A
zacw ,t rzazae et 1
Toto/Cowroge + eraa,z ,t = 17.6R 1
L Front Yord Coverage - 3.7M
��� t. a5 %ice sq.5O o13a gyp— _ I
Toto/ Spaces Required = 63 spaces
Prgoased Parking Spaces = 67 (fnc//2 hondl,,pped) I
Lot 2
M M Wn9 h
(Fa.eod 1 -
1 BZ'49"35' E ,
1
// 8375 23�_
I _ H. d J LYbob
1 --- — W.ee /nwr a�wce�wbY OW EEA9—kg
Aasocrotes.
1 1 , 7 dgirN ` tY /mea o-e /ran dtY of Savfh eurrvl9ron T Mms (in / r /
------------
Legend par-'d 20 pedes o
_--- ------------
- Ovte revised De ptian Lriecked Date
p Gamete monument hr/nd 1 -- -- -___________ ---
Design LA✓ �'ifa A/irn
®
C--te mmument to be set `
I
or oiection aJ omer 1
A
1
C,,kawd Paiir i ____
li
---
-_______-____-_-----
1
Property L-or RVbt of eby
—A4
Erhtm9 ground cmtour
®
seems monnw
HA* t
I
a' 25• 50• 100' 15a' tag' 250'
Bar Scale = 50'
i
1
Lot 7
Summer ice Joint Venture — — —
r �B a M. '
I1 / g'M=19529"
CB R B / e out=J95. J5'
t Extersan "•- wrw 9 R--2013
F, SMR IF2� _Swift Stroe PW sera wq M out=1965" -0 ---
8-M fi=19227'
B•M ou1=192.T1'
�e P _ __-
_'�wr„b --___
�q G-
i
1
l
Appear. / hm of
1 R — 0
i
eresfn9 Nono9e 1
i hv. out-195.57'
bK MJ9{00' i
/
A�w CS a .
LYBY N / Rim=TOJ.3' -
,//'
wdwAd Mvdhr196Q7' 1
1 50'bufhr -/
�200
a✓h.aa{wv �i` .
Awd
1
II
� 111 I
I
\ �
% 1Q13 wer/mB -- t
% � ear Nww m,e wxr j
• ; A*w.
wavy
Appror ocorton / i ifm_,D.
CAM I We~
1 ,
cp
a
'•�
1
Lot 2
� I
N/E
1
Notes:
Munson Earth
Haying
1. TMs a nor o bom aay A x P WC y /Res mow, ow aa, o /Asa+
aeaabNmas Pw "by Che r'W. -M9 AswocMrwr
2. Aburf/sg Mgowrry /Asps a+r stun City a S-M b w #wtbn roe AkP, (M
1 ------------------------------
I— — - ---�
N 8_375 23�—
— —
288.03r
I
1
1
1
1
Fa-�D9y �
1
11\
OefAwltftR! `\
Flrvrd 'B' \
\
\
t� \
\
7-7 :
1
1
1
1
1
` \ 1
I
\
50' AutAsv �\ , k
I
I
ael,e%pmsnt,
ea ROW
1 1
,I
_______ i S 845936w 9
— --��-1331.J1,
eo x
--__
------------
cbnnectAri )a-
- se ewoorrmo�t
Proposed Bul h9
Office
7"500. sf
fT=1070
:�rwo wawtr, sr1a. m9 ewe. I
a .ate i
I
I
\ I
/\f I
I
I J
-'-} FF 2070 -
I 1
our -
Trash wMowrc
faits Sse oefay
Ner Co r5
Rem 10225'
m=J96.B5"
rb
maGR
/nv J � 9 1
/nv. rzut=196.IS'
�
!
g
I
i
i
el F -10d 0"
o s"
I Raw. owaer
r
f \ \\
1R ,
-:.195.65
I
l RA,=199.0'
Inv
F r-J9395'.
/
b
2
1
tY1 'v -f
� Mv.. t•194.J;B S z can
M. -19520
JO' --
emu(-i95
1 1 --
1
\ I
r
50'setback
I-
1 1
1 1 Mrooa�dTo H. & ✓ Dubois
I ' �Psawa 2
' 200' Z m9 But/e-
1 1
I I
01=6 N/ webard
��l%r-TORS •f f
Mv. MIm�197Ja'
MK t�197.40'
u
Potable Water Supply and
Wastewater Design Flows:
whste—ter Disposo/ and Oamestic Ubter Supply Design flows
flows for Employees
Type of employee Number
Drivers 40
Of# e sW6,Uechaol s 10
rotol employees = 50 (af shifts)
Rows f- employees = 50 amp. 1 15 CPD/emp - 750 CPD
Total Design Row = 750 690 " 0.9 reduction for water saving
future 67.15 CPO
Plopct to be seal by
Lot 3
f' Summer ice Joint Venture
{ Area=20.2 acres
}
f�
fiend
-I-
O monmrsif RvnJ
v �,a.r. mmumnr ro d wl
• o.,twre� or,r
rr,tAq pane msrar
® ENfN➢ww-mmM1de
;L b✓mt
N 82 49 35" E, — —
f042.51r
AUG 12 2C
04
City of So Burlingto
__ _ M1br mares oq/^
40' 80' 1T0' 160, 200'
Bar Scale 1" = 40,
If
I oo Lot 4
E Chose Properties -
a Development, LID,
Lot 7
Summer /ce Joint Venture _ - - ---�
_ - - -- It
PPC 1 -�_ \
a M. a,t 5, (+\ S 8439 36" K
--f, t Extenshn New /Yee-st-dJ , Ren=201.5• \ -J. _-__B -
v _ _ - 1331. 31 '
ex. e' PIC se �,�..►-
__-T--
P
zz
GL
fit\ _�__ _.------i'`' \ I
z --
i - ••` as -\\
---� � •-•••- \ '•\ ylll N _ -- � l - _ � -___a ._ \\\ \ \ \\\ LYGI9s /// MOt/Td
J
I APPro..- i oree ol�i /'/ j •\ 4 , 1 1 �.,,.` �� �� , \\\\ tea¢ \\
I •� t '\ _\�41 r�'�ad 2 , /� i \ 1-_`.\ ♦ \ i,l'1 i t
lo
Mewed A.hj.1sSC0' jif
I
Iln
i h¢ mrL/9590' II ` _ '/ ! ' (11 l
II / I I 11
•\ I J.`./ �� `� Mv. ! ,9a 4o �i I 3bi
1 200T weNwd \ /e / 111 ; I I ( 1 1 .III I
1 1� L111
PA�d i i i 1, i I Proposed Bui/ ng
N Office P>� NVAC ed / 4�IIIj
7500 If 11 1 1 1 1
1 11 \\
.t "/ 1\ 201 / , mo R / , fill;
\\Y,\
%Px5 \\\\ \\ 1 l `\ _I `�r'esn drNosure :$ 1 j ( Na. CB
owr-19.40'
% 100J rot/wC
111
L7 1 I �w is o.�\� `Ilia
daMeona, ' N . ••,e >eer �' \ \\\ \ , \` : \� \ \ \ , , 's', � >� � 1411 I 1
! (Ilney and rb�rw aut/W 1 .•\ , L\s` \ \ \ \ , 1 xi Nw CB 1 III 1I
•� My r=>96.80`2 i \\�s� ,1 \I1 ,1 I I I Rh-20 23' O� I11111 O
I � .... �.� � *� �� I I} 1 i i i I I i 'i M✓. r95as' � I n u�
%/ `\ `\ �. •gi :;\. 11 1 I I 1 I 1 I ; 'A My our�,96.73'1 � 11111
I I •\ ' ••-.•_ `e \\\\_{ I,III I I F; � . I 111111
.I IIII 1 ' I w / 111111
w •\ N arNet \ \\ \\ 1 1 I I I I 1.2
sl2cru e
z75 Lot 3
-W&9 `1.2 , My our_,9c 9' •'\ I \ I 1 I I i �' II IIII 1 /r
tibv Y wdMd , N>w �•,d wend, ♦.\yr 1 i i I 1 I i i I lYl Summer Ice Joint Venture
-31
I } Me wr ,9s,c i - rF ao70' , nu / Area=20.2 acres
W C" IZI.i ;` \. i it
I ] � 11 iiii
so' butler � CO .25' I g f 1111
O i �.�• 1 1 1 I �� Mv.:r-f96.15 IIIII
DJ 1 \ 1 � I Mv. avfvJ96.15'1 II11
" I I Rwosed 20'
S I 1 1
I I I 1
�-- - - — - - __•'y , i � f; � I q x10G4 i __ _ _ _:. I g ! I liiii
1.4
9 RM 2025' 1 )liiii
Rbn=/99.0, I 1 11111
iiiiii
x20275 111�11
i � FI Iil�ll f III II II, I 2° "`1 ulln
f 1 I 11 , I I I I I`1 I New R2 111111
/ 1 1' jj� 11 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I {II 1 .vew d sxrvon im:20120�-195. I I I I 111
�ADSN p lilt' l ; Mv. r�lr9�lwd'8 sromi t nv -t 19J0• 5f iii l
Lot 2 I I a 1111111a I,I,1-. >=ara3 n1�11 0
I F 11 (iifiii� ill III 2o,b a iiiiii
Munson Earth I Notes /s nor o —wy u!11}i.
✓%ng I. mt> Y FIwaty P/w //'+�' anown ore flan o enuuae I I I 1 1 1 1 �_
MoI fill
7/eadvMatd Pak'by GYM Eng -, Assodore>
2 Abwmg Prww y /Me> we nan air ar Sawn BWM9ran r- mr , (M 1 1 I , 11111 1 I , I I 1 1 I_ _- - _ 1I j I 5N E - -•—
.Wt.,f-). li'sa�--'r ;� I1� N 82493
\y\\\ ` /// 1 .1°k�/ f fill --1042.51
�02 -11
-- ----
8375 -oren for II
I ___3y-setback rao9e Ji I
— _ N11F
N 2�, — P wne•d �• H. ✓. Dubois
ee .d PE a2
I zoo• z M9 errrnw
1 I 1
Legend
J- mxa nr
• s...x
Nib Iam>
■ rd.,.re e,�,w,„e ro a w
�ra,a
---- »ter RWe,-
® .e..-mmnw•a
� H/Vmf
mrm�
0' 20' 40' BD' lip* 200'
Bar = 40'
��f1y C/l,o fS
�Icd
1
Am wntur+
we,
-cr vw1 p
- .
� Nkr Aw-atmAYra Cdel
\
stw r2 SW °"/ft St/ seta v c ,aaa
RkrraYMO"�
D" Mr. J 192..T]" weer 9 P
- 1 B•M. ou1=,92I1' '--_w_/ay a 0---
®------------------ — --
8 ®--®— —
a/-
_
I
1
orvfMq ba.,a9. ..
./ Qhls / ,•
1
M, �
�,;, � y=--------, "'per \-- _� �,•
III k�.i / '-`r-- - -- -------•'" .:-
Ii
Pond
IIj
i O
1
( I�I� III11
\ IIIi11i /11�1
I
IIII
I
2011
\l t \ I
'J �\ •'� I 1 .1
I \�I�i I,III
I 1 I 11 11
�i••'�`I W� \ t ' 1 1 1
b • 11
P> AYE
1 I F f % f7)A/
®I I
rTOI i
14
I _
��' `, (t• 1 I III 1]���\�\`,
it
kill
QItll 11 If
1
I R/ , "IIII'
111' 11 1 II
l
'II'Il'/ Ilillil
Lot 2
N/t
MunlanEwYh
MO"hy I I i, II nryay� i ,
111,1111 IIII, 1,
1 1 ,111111j Iil,l 1,
1 Notp.. , 1 Ill 111 lr ll�l III I, ll
W1
=- Proposed Buil n
Office
Pas
7, 500 s.
Fi-207.0'
r
Lot 4
Ill went
,
I I
1 , I
��---�------N-�J
77
.5j 84159 36r Y
@------
Sei Oetaea �! `
'I
c1
1
r 1
+21J1. 75 I
1
'.,FF
'
X
207
1
I
I
1
�
1
1
I
1
1
J I
I
I
'
I
�
I}j '
I
1L 1
�
1
I J
,10275 r
I
,
i
1
L
a !
I
16
nJr
Il,ll
_ IIII
fill
n
1"
�� II
-y 11
11
�11
11
�111
IIII
/ Jill,
III,
'IIII
II I I11
11111'
Illllj
I111,
IIII,
11111
°IIII,
11111
9111j O
� I111
111111
1 I111,
'IIII,
1 IIII
lun i
1 u't, I
1�, I
In I
I It
dull /
1 IIII 1
Jill
'IIII
I I111
duu
Inn i
'IIII
Illljr
111111
�111,1
111111
�nU
I I11
I ,. Ab N rror o -- y r Hq-y 1Mq Nowr n! DYm oWar rrNINO II �1'$\•�\���iw.�i " 1 ' \ll . / ii �l ll
7MoabN rds Pak"bY CM E�rgirwiq Amvera[
-II
2 ADulthq P'9r~'rY /np ar M1arr CRy o/ So9M d iglm tar fkpwap b II
-71
AI
] / I
1At _ 8325 23r E — N�
_ 20 le nP H. & ✓. Dubois
- _ - - 288-031 II I�E f OLf/rR�
010®®®
CAM r I.060kaw'd
�,
9'0
i>
Landscap/ng
Schedule
Unit
Esth-W
�.¢i9telax
vzoOLOW
S~
C"t
eats_
Ausfrioa Piro
8'-10' tor,/ 21
®rr
1495
111.M5
Plw ry.
Rid A/gw4
2-1/1" ro' 5
•Yrr
OW
1x000
.It.
P.&-. Alb
2-1/2" cal. 5
$450
$2250
r<1
I DarxpYer .-. ..
!B" aPreod 6
• r'
i100
1600
Jnibmy "Aomrocw'
2 9W- 25
0"
IM
12000
•j Bbm
Y tow 6
0-
$90
I%0
Ile fw bar 1R �or
3' tow 19
• H
$125
2375
1
(>~
Jpa��-
2-1/2" M. 4
•^
1-W
11,200
f6Fkw-il9
11X r2v
Lot 3
Summer Ice ✓oint Venture
Area=20.2 acres
Leaend
al■. r ..blsd .ate ,r.,,
u Via,
N 82 49 35' E —
jo42.51
0' 20' 40' BO' l20' 16" 200'
BCr Scale - 40'
Oafs reHaeJ
Oesalalian c'ncvtea
D°°19n 'AJ
Landscape Plan
Drawn fl1P
Check"
Corporate Headquarters
Scale 1•- A
Land Air
Date "Y27, �
Pro' t 03225
Swift Street Extension-HJnesbu19 Rd South 8-Mgt-, Vermont
A/PEBS d L4i 'SING Consulting Engineers, Inc.
_ _"�`
/B'! Alain Stree4 Colchester, Vermont 05" "
.D
1I
I
m I Lot 4
Properties
ent,
petL 1D. — —
o dopm
Lot 7 _ —
✓en tune
_-
3
Ln
I
Summer /ce Joint _ — ---�
_
R i W,
"T.�.' , - _ :
84596 3�% — —
-----'�=--�� —
c. .svu ert Swig S'troat ExlBnsbn
y
1331.31'
ea'. B�PIC x.'a' A...' 4'_ �
B• by h=I9135� _ OttB_
192,
♦
- + T `-- Y .�•+��"
.. iYPeA
oa,s m e lriand
f ift
/
1
7�i-i
1�>''•
s
_
Ond w/u- are the A—inonce
by the nor lightnq, m
------_-_
of \
h9 oaf
r'
y^ i
q• •.
+"'
•
provided
- .' foot —Yes, os calculated by
'
y• Y .-� ry -
Lux/ on, V2J2, by Cooper Lighting.
aim I
{ - -.
Y tt Y !
L
TYPE A
wwMsld
'^tom'
,r
_ 1
rvupr os a r
E Y q
Contour Lem/s
i pr osed Building T _
P ///umkace
s a-ea>eo
eJ.n,. �.•" 0.1 loot-eoadle
- --
otrice oe'
Z, 0.2 tool -condo
y a• 7
TYPE 03 loot -condo
wl w
to fbot-_.VO
1`
+ .IO /bat-tnnale
—.* J� y ' 5..0 foot-can0'e
`, ',J.:
t r 1 � ■ ■ 1. � h1>�.,.
se. 4eravv
r
r r
olee..eu. I
�_-•>� Y ra f - t' i ,
-
.. Lot J
rhq
owe
t• ': Y Y
_.
Summer Ice "ht Ventura
p e.narw
-
Area=20.2 acres
r s ((
IR
I- Pale mounled
1a' -
� i '
Lumbroireum Lo k
r' Hammera-ea
rftry rryt Wd e.
_ _
-
// � �
�
q
.. + >' s • I.
� Y
s
5 noun!rrd h
2h' q
\
s> 1 TIM ■..,`...YY�
�
-°
..
w \
t Y 1 f
pass /// eel/and
� F)' 2aY.B'
3` �
Base cave/
Ji
Y - I I —III III_
a�mrna.wtocr
tria., f- lbrnoorians.
I rY
I r r Typ/co/ Area L/yht Deto//
I' H, rS
IV82.4!
60/ selbdck
N�
N 23—E — -- N. a ,t Aubo/e
I I � 1rl
LUMRRN
Kax.•rJs./., � e��....,. a.r tl r
r Yww • eteb-r w!'e 4. i. e.rr ;...
- 1nu Yw�1"a r.4 -
o«,rY.w»e4.e. t reNa. w..a�a •....ry ■■MON7
nwe rv.,.. t wa
TYPE B
Lama k ANV orrpaaf Mtri Mount
ro wrr, wero•-nm,�✓, rn acvwo /nw. R.xcrn
w v ✓anree ,1 145
(a 115' where n —)
w�...�: �--�;::w.• ..- a w'-•ar..
w"e.www � • ^
TYPE A
Lamaf Harwne- Ana Ught
J�5 worr, .vero•-ndraa n 15 q.roa
vae u,..,nrea or '
tvm..v
pnafFL'1
bn
J
O
c�
0^
sew.
o' 10' a' ,sa' ,so' scn'
BOr .SCOle - 40'
Date -...d
be.nprtar I 0.« aore
DeeNn f"J
Ligh tin Plan
Drawn FAW
Checked
Corporote Headquarters
Scale l w - 40
Land Air
Date • Y17,1
Pro t Oa 5
SWR Street Exfmsion-Hhesburg RD South Burilngton Vrmont
AREBS & IWASWW Consulting Engineers, Inc.
164( Alain Stree4 Colchester, Vermont OSl�6
Lk/ro-AI D— Mon O 10 g Ooc*, Lo g Oackr
Tso'
-
iel
ii
I
I
CONE
I
I
OF•
oo!Overhang
.4J-R
p
F
F
comP
I
I
I
F
E _ _
ADMINISTRATION —
—
W
TRUCK TERMINAL
I
i
i�'2i
I
I
JA
M.
I
FF
-r
RREAI(�....
OM
4' Roof
ang
—
T R
—
—
—
�
��
fiacoT-r
Fii�siPFJ•
r• - Py-o"
Eh57- ELLVArION
r-YS'-O"
mac'
■■■N■■■■■■■IN,
L—aw 0o LoaR'y ax*, I/SI !Mv Dff -h D—
WEST FLtVADON
r - Iv -a-
4' R f 0 -9 4' Roo! Ove -g
ovx HVN daw, arer frvcF duds
TF
,f fieen .sAdng.
e
0'
O"
O,rk G oy w Bron
f b/xk
-'
. ...
F/,v. ].0,Nfwn
aoB'
Ia10'
Oev TOJO
:. ...... '.' �..
Ym Ogrr
BO.O'
NOPrtl EUVATION
r -V-a"
50UTi1 EUVAI-ION
r, -rsl-m
RECEIVED
AUG 12 2004
City Of SO. Burlington
FOR PERMIT REVIEW
Thrust
Existing water main
rrahnsleeve and KoNe by Clow,
New water service —.-� ueeror approved equal.
Wet tcp shall be instilled by persons
approved by the City of South Burtington
Dept. of Public Works and the Engineer.
[Aical Tapping Sleeve and Valve
Catch Basel
Site
Max FJ-
D1ometsr
J' da
12
4' ah
24'
3 dh
30
so oft
JB
Frame and grate,
LeBwm LF248-2 w equal
LeBaron LK120A r ogee
/s greoter thin 5( bfgee r
6'
T�
✓rite, b" rhg
4:
W-
- butyl rope.
b
Isyt "
Cate •oho and trmp-
q' switch. Kennedy Central
Sprinkler 59GF w
F-tM-o1h t snail
be him than
1 out e/ -t-
tt5d5
8
8• approved equal
�
8'
To domestic
Bockflaw Prevention
�Pp/y
2'
U-*&Vbed mat-W
(Watts Series 709
double check or
8
veal equal Bockfiow Prevmlion
aPPra % City Entrance (Watts Senroe 709
dmble check -
See mechanical drawings fordetois of Wpro-d equal)
sp nkl- syslern, domestic wot- must be
lso/oled from spnkl- system with Wotts
Sines 709 double aheik or Wp--d equal
Backflow Preventer Schematic
K T.S
Anchorage of Valms
I3/16' aklYd 2 1121, J/2r- ~
rerw
na. abW wkpd to
6mf ohs .6w
oe char e.
choir.✓ h ,stare _
3/4' e-, loft 3' Area of eewh9
threaded wed mr/s
rr1 r/gAfeme� •.• agokhlaf u+bseweed
u,aarweed a-m
Section Elevation
Note
A thrust dank Y1aN be iulohe d W warsmah
ean:d oar, .o'.. emit. ,dies redraws me aw me raga
N1th roncreM supp-t
d mho ( buried
gore woe Oeloa eeo I. umwrweee sW
Yh l - me
hw 1A o/ ppe
6' mho hro � l•kr9 ' .'
(/W^cd% • �� male ,bad ark Efhcfiw b
✓o/ve/Dead End yore �o ). Reducer
Und[sfuread for ,tole: Aoce J me. (mhhwmy
pdyeMy,Wrs Yroef bittern
d/ cmwere thrust Molt
oral Ppa/ Arfhys to
fxewnr erne
cmoe're am not row
ears ra. ! errhgs
u etnvbae tar
Tx 90',45,22 1/z'
ar 11 1/4'Be7d
Thrust Block Details
N. Ts
u............ .a,e -1 q inn Q-- of r ,rota Thniel m-* fin a feeti
.Y
4•
s'
S.
12"
sea
—AAao
a3
a1 a3
aJ
Q3
IO a1
QJ 10
/J to
as
20 25
l.J
1.0 4.0
SS 10
Is sere fwhi
14OW
O
1.0 loll
aJ
1101to
as 10
l0SO Eq
l.q
45 65
15
EO IQ
14017.5
40
"
1.0
to to
aJ
Eo
as l3
40 13
10
rJ
eo 3
5025111
6afi3
30 qn0
1.
1
3 73
o
1
13 tll/0
).
2,000
10
J J
to
SO
70 AO
20 lQ
ISo Bo
l0
l6
I40
7.0
IS sort .ray
I"
ewr...�a�.e
-
gob tar
ono catch bosh sire shag be /:erg- thin
:,dr wed m the odoaent wart if the
raoammended tact,» b- of pyres p—t-Mg
bye catch bosh n eAca W
S j Yryr ro �
—Cost 41 place aanerete
,bar. Use close B concrete
(.;600 psi) between cant
ion bane and precast
cone,,1. catch bosh
voted bmwr by Cbnp• piawdd - equal
- AS1M q- C478-88
- A000 PSr co-w.
- Steel revibled to AS7f $vacs.
- AASHrO H-20 wheel /pod
Mbhrpraof aid with
11m-drkd grout.
taw
124•-////////
/ "-J/4" to 1 1/7- grhlenee irate
rwica/ Catch Basin
1K T.S
D+1"
na`kro ra nerd, wofvq
c anaa es pa,.e a riknriy
>� �mrbhy
rhb 09tA - NJ.9W
,.v.4vnma
rook- cawr,e en�
a-ren x a -ea ear
m J' h ar'enerr, n
m Ar�roa gay -
/
korneear w heawfea
aw—ArrI/"b J/e'
e r..nrx e..ck- noted,
ova a 11^ /w J
• gran sroen
lbw nnar .YM aaw pa.en I
5EE
95l
90R
q
standard
stmdord
I
prod-
Proctor
ma stir vac
1/I' ro J/i' ovahM erere Sw demo !w aY ppe
era. ra,refew or ppe exw one caw
cnairurn.e m.rrke
Storm Trench Detail
N T.S.
ctrr7lw I r far saw m m Jr
rr .. ware a�w Jr
son - trW ; I 1,r Roe. threaded m AOM
ends weh ours
cox aid• luya f- Jo'
� ivy a JB' ray .
r I use 12" b 2(12 4'r
only.
jAs / 1 A
Fla A/temots (bM/e�60na
Rehf-gee edge . Xa1aw
1. Ton plot. ro De pinched to maw habk h
Mkt Ap J/e' ga-,ree b-, to be Am~
"". or - plate is W + ia' far "' to JO'
dknnerw ppe hdurr. and W + 22' few J6' to
4B' diamets ppe hc/u.lre.
H 2. Skkt secrkn hoc 12" to 24' d/arafw ppe
7 halos"re (p fie move m me piece
1 • B" J SAxf archon b Ja" b 4e' diwners ppe
/Mae 11 ce mac epoch hd-iw may be move tram fro shxfs tamed
by riwfmw brrhg m cents /hs tied
E%eN7t%M J/B' 9d irad drofs w bdrx
4. C.mecr- se 1- s pro,. and far Mafe
tK
ro bk- OerrenskxY pp ever
abnela
/Y Yet. IY I I n
w p/.N 24' aw4 9 IJ B 4/ 48 2-� 1
Qyw SWt1W
End Section Detail
nts
E
Construction Notes
1. the Cmtroctar w111 be responsible fa al/ cgnstnrctim of water man, stern and sanitary sewer systems as shown on the dims He orb"/ be
revan.b/e for o// necessary adopter; Nth98, eta to make cannectims to the exlstmg and prgoosed uthihes. The Cmbacte, shd/ be
responsible far d/ work shown or anp/ied on the plans md/w ref -mood h the spec 6catims and permits The Cmtroctor shot/ submit far
approve/ by the Engine- all types of mafer/o/s and products used
Water Main
1. the poe f wore, man shol/ be ducti iron class 51 manuloctured h accordance with AWWA C751-76, ar PW pressure ppe DR 18
(Schedule 80) AWWA C900, as noted on the drowhgs A// ppe shall ham push an type Joints Al/ fittk,^ valves, etc. shd/ have mechenco/
lbhts. Poe rtfngs shall be manufvchrred by Clow, US Pipe, ,lohns-Umn7le, or approved equal.
2. A// poe shall be into/led h occcrdmce /AWWA C-600 Ore ppe shall be kept free of ! 0, matt- and &an's during krstd/otim. When
the process of poe /ayh9 has stopped my open ends of ppe shall be plugged More shall be a -Nmum of 6 -0" cover over al/ ppe and
service lines Any ppe de8actron shd/ not exceed fifty (50) p-cent of reccmmmded manu7 fur-'s maximum deA tim. 8-*17/ mot-los
and procedures shall be as detaded on the drawings The Cmt tar shall be responsrble tar my and a// sheelhg and/ ~k'g noes y
to comply wA05HA - WSHA reguletlIns.
J. the testing 0! the water mam shall consist If the testing of all i std/ed ppe, service; hydrants, etc. fie testhg shot/ consist of a
pressure test followed by o leakage test. A// testhg shall be done with potable water and h the presence of the Engineer The pressure
lest canssRs of montaining a mhh7um Alt of ppppe re of two hunted (200) pounds per square caw w two (2)
how s Fodure to hold the presswe (+/- 5 psi) /w the specified tine crostitules loDure of the feet
lw the pwticu/w section o/ ppe.
The leakage test shall be conducted for me (1 hour.
The lkne for the leakage test may be !nc/uded with the tine of the pressure test. During the leakage test the quantity of water necessary to
mahtah the testhg pressure o/ the silent shall be measured The leakage sha// not exceed the oeowaible vYues as shown in table 6 AWWA C-
600. Failure of my test section will necessitate repair and/w rep/ cat of the faded cation. Workh7g pressure and test pressure shall
be del -mined pkrf/y by Eng*,— and loco/ go—W agency
4. Ch/winotim of the item shall be accomplished after the water main has been successfully pressure tested and thoroughly flushed Dishhrtim
shall be h accordance ww/AWWA C-601. the method of dis,0&ct/m shall be approved by the Engineer and only after romp/es of water
from the flushed disk7fected main shows no evidence of bocte � gica canl-nhotion. Use 50 m9/1 hr 24 hours. The concentration must
remain :Yore 25 mg/1 Tablet dshfection is not acceptable
Sanitary & Storm Mains
1. One pipe far sanitary sew- and storm rho// be PW gravity sew- poe SDR 35 (ASWO MJ4) with robber -ahg rings. Al/ ppe shall
be laid to the /he and grade shown on the plans
2. The hstd/ed sanit y sewer ppe shd/ be low pressure own tested h the presence of the Engine -.After ppe Neanrng, the pipe
sechan (manhole to manhole) shd/ be tested according to the f:6owhg procedures An Memo/ ppe pressure of 4 pounds per square
inch greater than any bock pressure due to a wafer table shall be created A minimum o/ two (2) mhutes shall be allowed for
temperature stabwiatim. fie poe sectim shall be considered acceptable when, tested of o pressure of J pounds per square inch
great- than any back pressure, the section does at lose air of o rate greoler thm DOOM cfm/sf. of Mend pipe area.
Seporotion of Water and /or Sanitary & Storm Mains
1. No water main shad be Nos- than ten (10) feet to any emit y sew-, stom, se or sanit y manhole, and five (5) feet to anycatch
basin. Provide minimum of 18• vetoed sepw0thn between wat- main and sfmn/smilary sew-.
Ja and Notes
In addYion to the above requirements, all water lines and sewer lines and mmholes shah/ be thoroughl
y tested by the
Cent tar in accordance
with the E-knomantal protection Rules 9110182, Appendix A, S bon A-02(Ja&K) and A-04(CdH).
Note: Al/ constme6a7 shall be accp/ished in accordmce with the sfmdards act forth it the latest edition of the public works
yWecirrcoboh of the aty of South Bud07gton and ret enced specillcot/ant in the core of conflict, the mare sfh'gent spec/fi-l'an shall godly
Contractor shd/ keep a log book of at least three swklq ties to since local— and any polls of defiection ar wafer man fitfhgs Books
sho/ be turned ow- to the Owner upon accept— of work Bewtkns to the tap of s-vices shall also be recorded
O+2'
pithy ro meted Wawp
IM Cme.cb �d M
pa Me Waved
rswmedb her <eraflh9
eifh a.W - r057/A
.wwrkns
femme. by Me fnaner-
ea.r- mafeM ,bar
fah far Aew yrwrr
r m a .r« n.
95! 90.T
Acre. karoz day w
$RA- rd sfmZ'I
,.yank marro.
fvaa, m Iz' ima can
. ,err a, mekeree
proof- prxfar
arm. w br
-
Frfw
yhw ono,. as a�rrrhe
�e r,rme o char,
ra a
-
:7:
m
a�wd eenoye elm
« per vote - w
boo. a+,ra a ."i dye
, 6
See ptmt M d ppe
W me ores
(kres[whM.r4/wM�
Water Trench Detail
N T.S
N07E•
Top may be made directly to ductile iron
ppe. WWI other pees use either a coupling
contohing o factory -topped brass bushing w
use o double strga s-ace clamp.
Al/ tops larger than 1" require the use of bronze saddles.
All brass unions and adopt-s she// be Mueller
Access cap
d
poved cross —try-O
Te/escgoic curb box,
-buffelo
(n
typo
p
Mueller H-10JJ4 or
oppro-d equal
New corpoeatim stop Mueller
H-15008 or approved equal -
Curb stop Mueller Frost
H-15200 - equal
�8 x16"x4- solid concrete block
a
4 Water Service Detail
a
k N. T. S.
ee
Topping saddle .�1
Clow F-1280 (fore:)
F-6350 (for Pvcr
�� Wotei moi H+�
FOR PERMIT REVIEW
C
Date
0
4"
Road Construction Notes (A..ewae,n oadehawazy Paugawo<a,.e,,
1. New rood shall be constructed to the life and geode shown m the d owMgs The rood and utility locations she// be 1�pico/ly
detaBed unless otherwise shown.
2 Methods / construction of sub -base shall cent to Vt. Highway Specs. (1990), 20311 "wbgrade" in a// respects ar as
determined by the Engineer.
3 Gard sub -base /or parwnent shall con! to Vt. Highway Specs (1990), 704.05 table 704.05A coarse.
4 Leveling course shall conform to Vt. Highway Specs (1990), 704.05 table 704.05A, fine . Shoulders shot/ coal to section
704.12,, Aggregate for Shoulders.
5. Bituminous concrete per ent shall conform to Vt. Highway Specs. (1990) Sectim 406. BNfder coarse shall be t)pe n and
ill
wearing coarse shell be tppe17.
6. Any sub base or subgrode disturbed by Contractor, or rendered unsuitable by construction machinery shall be removed and
replaced with appmred granular backfill Sub base shall have 95X of maximum compectlan density before road construction.
7 The Contractor shall be responsible for all cmnpmtim tests far the rood foundations and utility trenches.
B. FYI material far road embankment shall be approved by the Engk a EA/ shall be placed n 6" Efts and wetted and compacted
with satisfactory compoctim equpment. The Contractor shall per/ 2 campocbon tests every 100" at the limits of
the filing operation and shall recanpoct areas with less than 95X of maximum density, (Standard Proctor).
9. Oh- pph'cab/e, the Contractor shall fellow Vt Highway Specs. (1990) Section 2031/ for placing and spreading embankments
10. Road in M/ sections shall be placed and compacted a mnemum of J feet above top of my utility to be Installed; before
trench is excovoted t pipe placement /n trenches, and cut secfims the C tractor shall provide all necessary sheeting,
shorng and bracing to maintain compliance with all OSHA/VOSHA regulations.
11. Sand All shall con/ to Vermont Highway -S-i6catims (1990) 7030J table 70303A.
Abhl LYher je are no1 downed but are sops -deviled as
.shown h the deter. below W- -wed flan Swift Street
IW-skn, facing south, eogl dn' y dope` Iowawa 0 the
proposed bt Adhg a1 1/4"per I t.
� driveway
4. avaha- 1 1 1/2' top tjpw N eAfwnk+nlr
fvw. Pow, wvfq awfbcv
AOr pc MSQT
6' said
AOT Spec lasw
09 &
r Iksd
_Proposed Drive Detail
N.TS
Fret» d' pas-
N off
Fnnh grade
LebiC 266,
anon CC 266
stelae to twah
a equal
Gaut flmre to brk v
Briar lewlhq course
Prweogk brxks be&—
(5) cwPese max
ortarhg
(2) caweee rah.
Og —1 mortar helve face of brink.
_ BWtIN r116 w.ahed gravel
n 6" lilts
U red htWrred sewn lido/ achy
��(7U405)
Canpoct to 95X of
orbnum =11ty
(Sta d&d Proc1ar)
Pra"bw pet h place
WWI when dpM
4,
-'-O' Rhg gcowl or Mosik
.steeds 6• flam tin
to ilwf.
AStkf C476 P—t rehfaroed
Use po)vrWj&M
concrete —Mae and cover
NM
by Co•1M PI—C Gf+ward - eWd
V2Mtge
J/1' gvrode 60 ales'
reh/-crnenf n eWd
Do not --tar hide 1
mj
h.
of manna..
Asphalt roofed
�2-
Mmhd. show be varuum rested
whd hest phl /t atN "posed
Mastk
Rwrrorw hp as nN.drd
AW 6• P'C
Coe n p/ — perused
goskel far W pipe penetrations.
C—A, 610f.
40100 psi' aanaaete
f/nokrhx6M fnohrio'
3/." to 1 1/7" arra'rM atone
e tail
New Sanitary Manhole
(Dog House StWe)
N. T.S
4" bit. cone.
1-112" rilps
2 1/1" To, i!
see site p/d, f cross slope (— /,;
bitumnous conorete poromenl
6" crtrshed 9-,W,
s / vsdng course
'0d
felft •sr 71405A me
704.05A
.meafh9 hawfs
g
.Coarse
-. 12" grate(. boss (m..
a posh 2' O.D.1
ill AL b,twdM
blear shy awned PNe
o�d� N -
se�vhcs
t;niw, .ill cwtwi rail
2" O.O. Pba—
J2" sand v (7o30.7),
as ordered byengneer
Afkari 50OX and or underamin
ors ordered by engneer
&2ical Pavement Cross Section
Al T.S
NONE
1. Sews- nw None to wte mohs shag be h oeeaeknee with
Me 5ecannwnded etalwm /a eewagw wales' m-ad/ed
M ante sf 2. oe
Sewers ,.fib at kin of /sod to /oar hat fawy hen any
erialhg a MNae/d 0. eb.. Me dblanro a , b
rnMVed edge fa eajlre. it // Mia d'afarce cannott ee a
Mon Me Ayes shd A. iufdhd aocvdhg for these top.o, set detobs
wale
Sal f boaknw nvnpoc'led - 6' ducN's bon wore
e" fopns,,' atafdad f6" min. (d s SZ) srnce
Pr«ra washy ��� 0e Sew
5Ywws oorshg watw mobs Meg b fad to
provide a mhimum wtkai dbtanro of 16'
bfwerr pane. Srww p h, we b puhbfanf
one ors hw as pwsdn ham Ms wat—ah
r0hts ellwr n b hposaen ro a,tah pn,o
epaotiay Me sewn ~ be dig,, and
cansbucW equal to wutw pbe and .show be
prvwxe letwl to aysm—twfighbwu
prier fa "',
Sewer / Water Seporation Detail
N. T. S.
D41'
perho ro vies- waw/hv
IM Cefbwrfa ale! ale
.M�i ov�i.� �vov�il �
r.w,kf6nw.-
pared aNar.d
area say. r
spent awrw:r afar
Mon 3' h dbnetw, Iw
tom kxwa daY a
h IY sun ere
— sore .t a 1/ ' !o J/
apjw( atawh mywv
�; aaos amhe mptwte•
deweva pp/
l' Riyd 51,v haAftier 1
�� and welw
`ahoy popes u
f/f' for J/I' auMed afaw
bs'ow mfMhe d pits _
J\
Sanitary Trench Detail
N T.S
Construction Notes
10 R.
!,Yee» trill 6 rhf// roofed
roared ,.tee/ top ro; 1' no.
/p I— Pope
fs bekw I Yon— Mro 2- oN
.. grand lire/ (tRa) xblh9 91aelnd
Ft
t oB concrete
p- wanwre (ryp.)
Live posh m1 [o a dpM of 2'-10" h a
10' dY—hw 'K dVi`s' a 4haft 3=6'
A/s0 with cmnete.
con v w .New b Y" m P4+e osrnbbd by s nit,,
dwthya a bdtb and shall to fi nb sd win, d/ the
nw:veay erthge Panels ehd/ he squiped with o Nwce rod
and truss rod to xppat Me /ranee J' dbrrfefw- gate
poets sha, b uesd fir gone /arprr tbal 4 mat.
Trash Enclosure Detail
n.t.,..
R•-B'
1. the Contractor will be responsible far o/ canstructian of water man, storm and sanitary sewer Systems as shown an the plans. He will be
responsible l d/ neces y odple,, Nfthgs etcto mare connections to the existing and proposed utilities the Cmfracto- shot) be
responsible f o/ work shown ar implied on the p/ s and/or referenced in the spec/rfcotims and perm;!,. the Cmlrmfar shalt submit 1
approval by the Engheer olt tees of materials and prrou cts used.
Sanitary & Storm Mains
1. The pipe for sanitary sewer and storm shay/ be PVC gravity sewer pope 5DR 35 (ASTMD J034) with rubber senhbg rings. All pipe shill
be laid to the Zile and grade shown on the plans
2 The instated smito y sewer ppe shot be low pressure oir tested n the presence of the Engweew. After ppe clearing, the ppe
section ( anhote to manhole) shall be tested occardhg to the folawnq prose curer. An internal ppe pressure of 4 pounds per square
inch greater than my back pressure due to a water table shill be rented A minimum of two (2) minutes shalt be allowed for
t peroture stobili ohbn the pipe section shall be considered acceptable when, tested o1 o pressure of J pounds per square inch
greater than any bock pressure, the section does not lose aw of a rote greater than 0.00JO ofm/s. f. of internal ppe orso.
Separation of Water and /or Sanitary & Storm Mains
1. No rote man shd/ be closer than ten (10) feel to any smif y sewer storm sewer or sand/ y manho✓e, and Ere (5) het to my catch
bosin. Provide mh7rnum of Ill" vertical sponation between rote most and storm/ der, sewn.
esth7 and Notes -
In addition to the above rsquirementsr all water lines and sewer hives and manholes shall be thormgh/y tested by the Contractor n accordance
with the Envimmentol Protection Rules 91101",, Appandix A, Section A-02(jW) and A-04(G&Hl
Note: A// construction she/ be occ phshed in accordance with the stondmds set forth in the latest adi!kn of the public woks
spec!! flan of the City of South BuHfirgtan and referenced speorwoM-o h the rose of cm6kt, the more st'gent speciffoat/j, shall oo/y
Contract- sho// kep a /erg book of of least three swing ties to servilocations and my pants of de9sctian or wotn main fittings Books
she/ be fumed over to the Owner upon acceptance of work. E/ewtims to the top of s Wcss shall also be ceded
RECEIVED
AUG 12
City of S). Burlington
FOR PERMIT REVIEW
O
O
O
O
O
Erosion Control and Construction Seouence
Starr state dn'win an downst,— side of fence
7
Mi'pb En.s-ola�a a
vawawkahc—fae
1. fie purposes of erosion cant-/ shelf be discussed with and
p p approw�d by the Engineer and the Town of IYdh'ston prior to any
Mko1/ l0a, kilter /obrk
stgo/e orce hors to f
Fite' &a6-k m woetreom Sb' e
cl—q,, grubbing, strippmg or construction of any kind
Stoke
Form 12- deers t mM
A
2. Al/ erosion control shall be placed as shown on the drawings or as "dered by the Engineer. All erosion control measures sha// be, at
/py fobrk In bottom
a minimum, inspected weekly and maintained to futrr// the intent discussed ob— The Cant—ctor shall maintain the erosion control
corer with q- V � ro
measures until the Engineer is satisfied that permanent ground corer has been established and that further measures ae not
required
Bdl<se flow
E
3. Men erosion control measures ore deemed no longer necessary, al/ materials detained including silts and const-ction debris rho// be
,
II
FOR PERMIT REVIEW
collected and disposed of in a monna acceptable to the Engineer and the Town of Wdh'ston.
4. if highly erodible soils ore encountered the Contractor may be required to prowde pte mott/ng, gobron or rivet mattresses rip
rap - oil,- measures as necessary to p—t erosion. Die Contractor shall stockpile hay bales to protect, at a in —um, al/
work in pogress All exposed embankments shall be topsoded, seeded and mulched os soon as possible after const—ctian.
iJ
Section A —A
II
VI I
1t I I
vl
II II
� j � To be A -Wed at 50' to 75'
I� ertwwldep-diM- pitch,
acre reNved
aesmprxn a J
A
a � on s
S. The Can she// use woke- and/a talcum chloride i r list control. fie Contractor shall also sweep Leroy Road as required to
Design lAd
Details
maintain dust control
Drawn f.MP
il-b
Temporary Si/t Fence
Checked
Corporate Headquo
Erosion Control
Barrier
Score vrs
Land Air
N.T.S
Data ",A
STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
171 BATTERY STREET
P.O. BOX 1507
BURUNGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507
(802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD)
STEVEN F. STITZEL
FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119
PATTI R. PAGE`
WRITER'S E-MAIL(ALAFFERTY@FIRMSPF.COM)
ROBERT E. FLETCHER
WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-2552
JOSEPH S. McLEAN
TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE
AMANDA S. E. LAFFERTY
(-ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y)
March 10, 2005
Jackie Stevens, Clerk
Environmental Court
2418 Airport Road, Suite 1
Barre, VT 05641-8701
Re: Appeal of Greco
Docket No. 12-1-05 Vtec
Dear Jackie:
JILL E. SPINELLI
WILL S. BAKER
Pursuant to your request, I am writing in connection with
the above -referenced matter to inform the Court of the status of
this matter before the City of South Burlington Development
Review Board. The Board's reopened hearing on the application
that is the subject of this appeal has been continued until April
5, 2005. I will inform the Court, in writing, of the status of
this matter as soon as possible after April 5, 2005.
Please call with questions. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Amanda S. E.
ASEL/br
CC: Raymond Belair ✓
Joseph and Mary Greco
David and Heather Main
Kenneth W. and Joanne Perkins
Peter E. and Leslie Black Plumeau
Paul and Cheryl Houchens
Donna Lee
Diane Naomi Roen
son5632.cor
Lafferty,
VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT
South Burlington, City of
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington VT 05403
----------------------------------------
Appeal of Greco, et al
(802)479-4486
255 North Main Street, Suite 2
Barre, Vermont 05641
February 8, 2005
Docket No. 12-1-05 Vtec
The above -referenced appeal from a municipal panel was received at the
Environmental Court on 01/21/2005. Environmental Court docket number 12-1-05
Vtec has been assigned to this appeal. Please use the Environmental Court
docket number and the above case name when filing any documents or asking any
questions concerning this case. All documents should be filed with the
Environmental Court at the address below the Clerk's name at the foot of this
letter. Also, if you have not provided the Court with a telephone number where
you can be reached during working hours for the purpose of telephone
conferences, please do so as soon as possible.
The Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings (V.R.E.C.P.) set out
the procedures to follow for this appeal. Enclosed is a copy of those Rules
minus Rules 3 & 4 which are not applicable in this type of action. I have also
not included some of the Reporter's Notes. You may obtain a full copy of the
Rules and Reporter's Notes at www.vermontjudiciary.org.
1. The person filing the appeal is called "the appellant". The appellant must
take certain actions in order to assure that this appeal is not dismissed.
Consult the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings to see what those
actions are.
2. This case will be ready for hearing or other appropriate disposition when
the time for filing the appellant's statement of questions has expired, or 20
days after the notice to interested parties has been sent, whichever occurs
later. The Court may extend that time if a request is made by written motion
filed with the Court before the deadline has expired. If this case is set for a
hearing on the merits, the hearing will take place in or near the county in
which the case originated. Please note that pursuant to V.R.E.C.P. 5 (b)(4)
(g), these appeals are de novo, unless the municipality has adopted procedures
to make certain appeals on the record.
February 8, 2005 - Page 2 - 12-1-05 Vtec
3. Faxing a copy of a document is not sufficient to meet deadlines for filing
documents with the Court. Faxed copies may be authorized by the Court in
certain circumstances, but the Court will not accept Faxed documents unless the
sender has first telephoned the Court and obtained permission to do so or and
unless the judge has authorized it in a scheduling order.
4. The person filing any document (including letters) with the Court must also
send a copy of that document to each of the other parties.
The Clerk of the Environmental Court will contact the parties to arrange
for a pre -hearing conference in person or by telephone with a judge or with a
case manager.
The Environmental Court will be moving on Friday, February 11, 2005. If
any documents are mailed to the Environmental Court after Friday, February 11,
2005 they should be mailed to the new address: 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1,
Barre, VT 05641-8701 the court's new telephone number will be 828-1660.
Sincerely,
Ja yn M. Stevens, Court Manager
Vermont Environmental Court
255 N. Main Street, Suite 2
Barre, VT 05641
(802) 479-4486
Encl Pro Se Form to all appellants & Notice to Interested Parties to Mr Plumeau
CC: Appellant, Mary Greco
Appellant, Cheryl Houchens
Appellant, Joseph Greco
Appellant, Heather Main
Appellant, Donna Lee
Appellant, Kenneth W. Perkins
Appellant, Paul Houchens
Appellant, David Main
Appellant, Joanne Perkins
Appellant, Peter E. Plumeau
Appellant, Diane Naomi Roen
Appellant, Leslie Black Plumeau
Open Case, South Burlington, City of
MEDIATION: Help in Resolving Your Environmental Court Case
1. What is Mediation?
In mediation, parties meet and make their own decision about how to resolve a dispute. Mediation is
a form of alternative dispute resolution, sometimes called "ADR". It is an alternative to court (where
the judge makes the decision). Courts around the country recommend mediation. Trying mediation
does not affect your rights when and if the case does go to court.
A mediator is a person chosen by the parties. The mediator was not involved in the dispute before.
The mediator does not make a decision in the dispute. The mediator helps the parties sort through
the issues in the dispute. The mediator also helps the parties discuss possible settlements of the
dispute. If the parties agree on a settlement, it is written down in simple terms and is submitted to the
court for approval, which then closes out the court case.
What are the benefits of mediation? What can you expect at your mediation session? How does it
work? Who attends? What do you do? This handout answers those questions.
2. The Benefits - Why Go to Mediation?
Mediation is usually fasterthan court. The parties and the mediator can schedule a mediation session
as soon as possible. In court, parties can wait months for a trial and a decision.
Mediation is more convenient. A mediation session is scheduled for a day and time that's convenient
for the parties. Mediation can happen on evenings or weekends, not just during the week. The court
must schedule trials during the workday.
Mediation is usually cheaperthan going to trial, especially if lawyers or expert witnesses are involved
in a case or if there are many court documents that have to be filed or reviewed.
In mediation, you can tell your side of the story — in your own words. In a mediation, all the
parties tell their side of the story, speak less formally than in court, and express their feelings. But the
mediator keeps things under control. The mediator focuses on settling the dispute.
A mediation is confidential. In court, documents and hearings are open to the public.
N:lediation can help a project applicant, neighbors, and the town resolve other issues related to the
dispute and agree on ways to handle any future problems related to the project. The courtcan only
decide the particular application or case in front of it.
3. The Process - How Does Mediation Work?
Mediation is less formal than a court proceeding. Mediation gives parties a lot of choice. The parties
choose the mediator. They choose a meeting place, such as a conference room in a convenient
location. They choose a mediation date and time that's convenient for all the parties.
The project applicant, the neighbors, the opponents, and a representative of the town can attend a
mediation. If these parties have attorneys, the attorneys would probably also attend the mediation.
In a typical mediation, the parties first meet all together with the mediator. Each side makes
an opening statement with no interruptions. The parties (not just their lawyers) say what they
feel about the issues and how they want to resolve the case.
Usually (but not always), the parties then discuss the issues together. At some point, they may
split up and go to different rooms and the mediator would go back and forth between rooms to
talk to different parties (like "shuttle diplomacy"). When a mediator meets alone with just one
party without the other parties, this is called a "caucus." In a caucus, a party and the mediator
talk confidentially. They discuss a party's interests and concerns. The mediator and a party
will talk about whether or not what they say in a caucus is told to other parties. The mediator
uses the caucus sessions to help the parties come up with settlement ideas and respond to
-settlements proposed by another party.
If the parties agree on how to settle the dispute, the mediator helps the parties write a simple
settlement agreement. The parties may sign it right there. If the mediation doesn't settle the
case, the Environmental Court will proceed with the case, hold the trial, and issue a decision.
4. The Mediator - How Do I Find and Choose a Mediator for My Case?
The Environmental Court has a list of mediators who have signed up to mediate cases in each county.
The list for your county is attached. People on this list are professionally trained to be mediators and
also have taken some special Environmental Court training. You and the other parties can choose any
person on this list to be your mediator. You and the other parties can also choose any other qualified
mediator, if that person is acceptable to all the. parties in your dispute.
If you're not sure about using mediation in your case or if you have questions, you can call a person
on the attached list just to get more information about mediation. You can talk to that person over the
phone-, the phone call is free (other than the cost to use the phone for the call). If you like the person
you call and the other parties agree, that person can be your mediator.
The cost of paying the mediator is often split equally among all the parties in a mediation. But which
party pays what percentage of the mediator's fee (or if one party will pay all the cost) can be discussed
and negotiated, when the parties agree to mediation or in the mediation itself. Different mediators
charge different rates. You may call more than one mediator before deciding which one to choose.
5. My Role - How Do I Get Ready for Mediation?
• Get all the documents or drawings you think are important to explain your side of the case. The
mediator may ask you for copies of these and may ask you to send them to other parties.
• Have someone at the mediation who can make a final decision for your side.
• Think about what points you want the mediator and the other side to understand.
• Think about weak points in your case. Think about the strong points of the other side.
-
• -1 Think about reasonable ways to resolve the dispute that would satisfy you.
Realize there may be ways to resolve the dispute you haven't thought of. Be flexible.
Many Environmental Court cases involve neighbors. If your case involves your neighbors, think
about what you'd like your relationship with these neighbors to be like in the future.
MEDIATION CAN HELP YOU AND OTHERS TO RESOLVE THE DISPUTE.
YOU HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE BY TRYING MEDIATION.
Chittenden County List of Qualified Mediators Who Have Met Experience and Training Requirements
for the Environmental Court Mediation Program
January 1, 2002
Last Name
First Name
Address
Phone
Fax
E-mail
Barra
David
P.O. Box 123. Essex Junction, VT 05453-0123
879-7133
879-0408
dbarra@up-law.com
Barone
Robin
P.O. Box 9, Newbury, VT 05051
866-5458
leabaron@aol.com
Bissonnette
Ellen
77 Harlow Drive, Bristol, VT 05443
453-4254
453-4254
bisson@accessvt.com
Blackwood
Eileen
P.O. Box 875, 90 Main Street, Burlington, VT 05402-0875
863-2517
863-0262
blackwood.law@verizon.com
Bryan
Lee
475 Tansy Hill, Stowe, VT 05672
223-2926
229-2141
Iwbryan@sover.net
Byrd
Yvonne
P O. Box 1084, Montpelier, VT 05601
223-4784
yvonneb@promediator.com
Cadow
Lisa
Viewpoint Resolutions, 45 Lyme Road, Suite 206, Hanover, NH 03755
603-643-5444
603-643-4994
Icadow@viewpointresolutions.com
Cassels -Brown
Peter
667 Conway Road, Starksboro, VT 05487
453-2350
453-2350
pacbvt@together.net
Cassidy
Richard
Hoff, Curtis, Pacht, Cassidy & Frame,100 Main St, Burlington,VT 05601
864-6400
860-1565
rcassidy@hoffcurtis.com
Cook
Cynthia
Adamant Accord, P.O. Box 2, Adamant, VT 05640
223-1330
229-6386
ccook@adamantaccord.com
Curley
Wayne
Woodbury Dispute Resolution Center, 660 Elm St , Montpelier, VT 05602
800-820-0442
229-2141
waynec@woodbury-college.edu
Fead
William ("Sandy")
Paul Frank & Collins, P.O. Box 1307, Burlington, VT 05402-1307
658-2311
658-0042
wfead@pfclaw. corn
Gardner
David
405 Culver Hill, Middlesex, VT 05602
223-6778
dgardner@pshift.com
Gartner
Sandra
1 Piedmont Drive, Rutland, VT 05701
775-4954
775-0174
FlukesKid@aol.com
Gerety
Robert
P O. Box 709. White River Junction, VT 05001
649-1910
649-1957
robert.gerely@geretylawoffice.com
Godfrey
Holly
73 Hill Side Terrace, Shelburne, VT 05482
985-5022
holgodfrey@juno.com
Hadwen
Brooke
457 North Street, Burlington, VT 05401-1620
658-6630
bhadwen@msn.com
Halpert
Rob
Zalinger Cameron & Lambeck, 140 Main St , Montpelier, VT 05601
223-1000
223-5271
rhalpert@zclpc.com
Hegeman
Mary Ann
33 Kirby Road, South Burlington, VT 05403
652-1002
652-1002
zema52@aol com
Kitchel
Katie
Viewpoint Resolutions, 45 Lyme Road, Suite 206, Hanover, NH 03755
603-643-5444
603-643-4994
kkitchel@viewpointresolutions.com
Lamb
Anthony
305 St. Paul Street, Burlington, VT 05401
865-6065
865-6066
alamb@alamblaw.com
Lawson
Barry
Barry Lawson Associates, P.O. Box 26, Peacham, VT 05862-0026
592-3949
592-3950
lawson@helicon. net
O'Donnell
Bob
WIN, Pomfret Stage Rd , Drawer 29, Woodstock, VT 05901
457-3211
457-1501
BobODonnell@woodstockinstitute.com
Palmer
Mike
P.O. Box 528, Middlebury, VT 05753
388-4073
388-3945
bridges@together.net
Powers
Donald (Tad)
Donald R. Powers P.C., 48 Court Street, Middlebury, VT 05753
388-2211
388-1113
drpowers@adelphia.net
Ripley
Barbara
Wilson & Wilson, P.O. Box 159, Montpelier, VT 05601-0159
229-1900
229-9839
ripley@wilsonwhite.com
Rodar
Neal
3130 Mt. Philo Road, Charlotte, VT 05445
425-3083
425-3017
nealr@woodbury-college.edu
Rome
Alan
159 State Street, Montpelier, VT 05602
229-5060
229-6213
quest@together.net
Rounds
Thomas
P.O. Box 33, 82 Main Street, Windsor, VT 05089
674-5373
674-5375
tmr@connriver.net
Ruth
Tina
397 Elm Street, Montpelier, VT 05602
229-1041
truthl@together.net
Scarborough
Kirby
1465 Center Road, Montpelier, VT 05602
229-5006
229-6850
kscarboro@adelphia.net
Simon
Brice
Webber, Reis, Holler & Urso, 60 N.Main St, Rutland, VT 05702
775-2361
775-0739
briceemail@aol.com
Suskin
James
52 State Street, Montpelier, VT 05602
223-7427
223-2575
jsuskin@suskin.com
Sussman
Susan
P.O. Box 908, Montpelier, VT 05601-0908
229-2310
224-9187
ssussman@together.net
Terry
Susanne
2847 Tampico Road, Danville, VT 05828
748-3512
748-5877
sterry@sover.net
Wilkes
ILorrie
LawOffice of Kevin Griffin,PO Box 799, White River Jct,VT 05001-0799
296-6200
296-6202
twilkes@griffinlawoffice.com
APPENDIX
Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings
.1. Scope of Rules
2. General Provisions
3. Civil Actions NOT INCLUDED IN THIS PACKET
4. Review of Environmental Enforcement Orders NOT INCLUDED IN THIS PACKET
•5. Appeals
.6. Definitions
•7. Title
'8. Effective Date
Page 5
Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings
RULE 1. SCOPE OF RULES
These rules govern the procedure in the Environmental Court created by 4 V.S.A.,
Chapter 27, in all matters within the original or appellate jurisdiction of the court and the
procedure in appeals from the Environmental Court to the Supreme Court. The rules shall be
construed and administered to ensure summary and expedited proceedings consistent with a full
and fair determination in every matter coming before the court.
Reporter's Notes
The Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings
are adopted pursuant to 4 V.S.A. §§ 1001(g), 1002, and 12 V.S.A.
§ 1 to implement provisions of Act 115 of 2003 (Adj. Sess.) that
expanded the jurisdiction of the Environmental Court and sought
to simplify and consolidate the procedure for appeals and other
actions before that court involving environmental and land use
issues. See 10 V.S.A. § 8501. The rules consolidate all rules
provisions applicable to the Environmental Court and replace and
expand the provisions of former V.R.C.P. 76. Enforcement actions
under 10 V.S.A., ch. 201, formerly covered by V.R.C.P. 76(b)-(d),
are governed by Rule 4. Appeals from municipal land use
decisions, formerly covered by V.R.C.P. 76(e), are governed by
Rule 5, which also applies to the court's new jurisdiction over
appeals from the Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources
and from district environmental commissions and district
coordinators conferred by 10 V.S.A. § 8503(a)-(c) as well as to
appeals from the Secretary of Agriculture, Food and Markets under
6 V.S.A §§ 4855, 4861. Civil actions within the Environmental
Court's original jurisdiction are governed by Rule 3. Enforcement
actions under 10 V.S.A., ch. 211, continue to be Superior Court
civil actions. Administrative rule -making continues to be
governed by 3 V.S.A., ch. 25. See 10 V.S.A. §§ 8501(1), 8503(e).
Rule 1, like V.R.C.P. 1 and consistent with 4 V.S.A. §§
1001(g), 1002, sets forth the underlying purpose of the rules, "to
ensure summary and expedited proceedings consistent with a full
and fair determination in every matter coming before the court."
In particular, as directed in 4 V.S.A. § 1001(g), added by Act 115,
§ 9, the rule is intended to be consistent with existing procedural
provisions of 4 V. S.A. §§ 1001-1004 and to provide for "(1)
expeditious proceedings that give due consideration to the needs of
pro se litigants; (2) the ability of the judge to hold pretrial
conferences by telephone; (3) the use of scheduling orders under
Page 6
the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure in order to limit discovery to
that which is necessary for a full and fair determination of the
proceeding; and (4) the appropriate use of site visits by the
presiding judge to assist the court in rendering a decision."
RULE 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS
(a) Applicability. This rule applies in all proceedings under these rules, except as
modified by provisions of the rules pertaining to particular proceedings.
(b) Coordination of Proceedings. On motion of a party, or on the court's own motion,
where the same violation or project involves multiple proceedings that have resulted or may
result in separate hearings or appeals in the Environmental Court, or where different violations
or projects involve significant common issues of law or fact, the court may advance, defer,
coordinate, or combine proceedings and may make other orders that will promote expeditious
and fair proceedings and avoid unnecessary costs or delay.
(c) Discovery. Unless the parties otherwise agree, the court in a pretrial order issued
under paragraph (d)(3) of this rule shall establish the type, sequence, and amount of discovery
available under Rules 26-37 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure, limiting the discovery
permitted to that which is necessary for a full and fair determination of the proceeding.
(d) Pretrial Conference and Order.
(1) The court shall hold a pretrial conference as soon as possible after the filing of
the last pretrial memorandum required in a review of an administrative order or the last
statement of questions required in an appeal or the time for filing either has passed. The
court may hold subsequent conferences, on its own motion or at the request of a party, as
necessary to promote the expeditious and fair disposition of the proceeding. Any
conference may be scheduled by the court to be held by telephone. All unrepresented
parties and counsel for all represented'parties must attend all conferences. Unless a party
or counsel is excused by the court in advance of the scheduled date, failure to attend a
conference may result in sanctions, including dismissal of the appeal or entry of default.
The judge shall preside at the initial conference but may assign the case manager to
conduct all, or specific portions, of any subsequent conference and report to the judge on
any matters agreed upon and any matters in dispute. Motions may be scheduled to be
heard at any conference held by the judge, and any conference or motion hearing may be
recorded by audiotape or other electronic means with leave of the court.
(2) At the initial conference, the following matters shall be considered, if
applicable, and appropriate schedules shall be established: (i) the status of any stay that
has previously been granted; (ii) issues of intervention and party status; (iii) whether to
advance, defer, coordinate, or combine proceedings pursuant to subdivision (b) of this
rule; (iv) whether to allow clarification of the statement of questions; and (v) the potential
for dismissal of all or some issues or for summary judgment or other disposition of any
Page 7
legal issue or issues before trial. At the initial or any subsequent conference, the
following additional matters shall be considered, if applicable: (vi) whether to narrow
the issues to be heard; (vii) the appropriate type, sequence and amount of discovery; (viii)
the use of prefiled evidence and expert witnesses; (ix) whether a site visit is needed; (x)
the use of alternative dispute resolution or other means of expediting the proceeding; and
(xi) any other matter necessary to the expeditious and fair disposition of the proceeding.
(3) In every case, the court shall issue one or more written orders under Rules 16,
16.2, or 26(f) of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure, as appropriate. The order or
orders shall, at a minimum: (i) dispose of any issues determined at the conference and set
a date for the hearing and disposition of any other pending issues raised; (ii) state the
type, sequence, and amount of discovery to be conducted and provide a plan and
schedule for the completion of discovery; (iii) affirm a schedule for any alternative
dispute resolution process ordered or agreed upon under V.R.C.P.16.3; (iv) if prefiled
evidence is to be used, contain appropriate orders concerning its use; (v) contain
appropriate orders concerning the use of expert testimony at trial; (vi) contain appropriate
orders governing a site visit, if any is to be conducted; and (vii) contain appropriate
orders concerning trial scheduling.
(e) Evidence.
(1) Rules of Evidence. The Vermont Rules of Evidence shall be followed in all
matters within the original jurisdiction of the court and in all appeals by trial de novo,
except that evidence, not privileged, that is not admissible under the Rules of Evidence
may be admitted in the discretion of the court if it is of a type commonly relied upon by
reasonably prudent persons in the conduct of their affairs.
(2) Prefiled Evidence.
(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, prefiled
evidence may be admitted as ordered by the court in a pretrial order issued
pursuant to paragraph (d)(3) of this rule when a hearing will be expedited and the
interests of the parties will not be prejudiced substantially.
(B) Prefiled testimony and related exhibits will be admitted only if the
witness is present and available for cross-examination, unless the court and the
parties otherwise agree or the witness is unavailable as defined in Rule 804(a) of
the Vermont Rules of Evidence.
(3) Site Y'isits. One or more site visits may be conducted when appropriate to
assist the court in rendering a decision.
Reporter's Notes
Page 8
Rule 2 sets forth procedural provisions that apply in all
proceedings under the rules unless these general provisions are
modified by specific provisions of the rules for particular
proceedings.
Rule 2(b) gives the court broad discretion to determine the
sequence and possible coordination of separate hearings or appeals
concerning the same violation or project or involving significant
common questions of law or fact. See 10 V.S.A. § 8504(g). The
rule is intended to give the court a flexible case management tool.
Under V.R.C.P. 78(b), the court has discretion to hold a hearing on
a motion under Rule 2(b) if appropriate. The rule does not directly
address full consolidation of proceedings, which by virtue of
V.R.C.P. 42(a) may be ordered only with the consent of the
parties. Rule 2(d) provides that these matters are to be considered
at the initial pretrial conference and may be disposed of or
scheduled for disposition in a pretrial order.
Rule 2(c) requires the court to establish the type, sequence
and amount of discovery in a pretrial order issued under Rule
2(d)(3) unless the parties agree on discovery matters. The rule
assumes that all discovery devices provided by V.R.C.P. 26-37 are
potentially available in all proceedings under these rules but
requires the court to determine the actual use of discovery in
accordance with the "full and fair determination" standard of 4
V.S.A. §§ 1001(g)(3), 1004(b). The statutory directive to limit
discovery calls for the court to order no more nor less discovery
than is required to meet that standard. The court will also be
guided by the provision of 4 V.S.A. § 1001(g)(1) calling for
"expeditious proceedings that give due consideration to the needs
of pro se litigants."
Rule 2(d)(1) requires a pretrial conference to be held by the
judge as soon as possible after the filing of the last pretrial
memorandum required in a review of an administrative order or
the last statement of questions required in an appeal and provides
for subsequent conferences to be conducted by the judge or case
manager, on the court's own motion or at the request of a party, as
necessary to meet the statutory standard of fair and expeditious
proceedings. See 4 V.S.A. § 1001(g). A case manager who
conducts all or part of a conference does not decide or make
recommendations to the court on pending questions but reports to
the court on any questions resolved or narrowed by agreement at
the conference and on the questions that remain in dispute. All
Page 9
unrepresented parties and all counsel must attend any conferences
unless previously excused by the court. As required by 4 V.S.A. §
1001(g)(2), the rule permits the court to hold conferences by
telephone. With proper notice through the scheduling order or
otherwise, motions may, but need not be, heard at a conference.
Rule 2(d)(2) prioritizes the matters to be considered,
requiring the status of stays, issues of party status, questions of
sequencing, and grounds for dismissal, summary judgment in a
proceeding under Rule 3 or 5, or other disposition of legal issues
before trial in a proceeding under Rule 4 to be addressed at the
initial conference. Other issues may be addressed at that
conference or a subsequent conference. Note that the rule provides
that "the potential" for motions is to be "considered," not that the
motions are then to be heard. Rule 2(d)(1) provides that motions
may be heard at any conference held by the judge. Motions may
also be scheduled to be heard at any other time. Consideration of
ADR under Rule 2(d)(2)(x) opens up the range of procedures
available under V.R.C.P. 16.3, which include mediation, early
neutral evaluation, binding arbitration, or any other method
involving a neutral upon which the parties agree. Note that, unless
the parties have agreed on ADR pursuant to V.R.C.P.
16.3(a)(2)(A), their participation can be ordered under V.R.C.P.
16.3(a)(3)(A), as simultaneously amended, only if the court finds
that ADR "is necessary to serve the interests of the parties and the
court in the fair, economical, and efficient resolution of the
dispute." Rule 2(d)(2)(xi) provides the opportunity for the court to
take any steps necessary to assure that the statutory directive to
"give due consideration to the needs of pro se litigants" is
followed. See 4 V.S.A. § 1001(g)(1). The issues considered at
any conference may be disposed of by agreement or by order of the
judge at a later date.
Rule 2(d)(3) incorporates the provisions of V.R.C.P. 16,
16.2, and 26(f) concerning pretrial disposition and scheduling
orders and requires at least one written order in every case. The
order or orders define the issues to be determined and set the
schedule for discovery, any further motions, alternative dispute
resolution under V.R.C.P. 16.3 if appropriate, and ultimately trial.
Rule 2(e)(1) simplifies 4 V.S.A. § 1003(a) (substantially
repeated in former V.R.C.P. 76(d)(4)), providing that the Vermont
Rules of Evidence apply unless the court admits unprivileged
evidence that is otherwise inadmissible but "is of a type commonly
Page 10
relied upon by reasonably prudent persons in the conduct of their
affairs" —the standard set in 4 V.S.A. § 1003(a). Note that an
amendment to V.R.E. 702, effective July 1, 2004, adopted the
reliability analysis of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), as a basis for permitting expert
testimony. Environmental Board decisions holding Daubert
inapplicable in its proceedings predated that amendment. The
discretion given the court to admit evidence otherwise
inadmissible under the Rules of Evidence would permit it, in an
appropriate case, to admit expert testimony that did not satisfy the
Daubert standard. Other language of 4 V.S.A. § 1003(a) is omitted
as adequately provided for in provisions of the Rules of Evidence
covering matters such as the best evidence rule (V.R.E. 1001-
1008) and judicial notice (V.R.E. 201).
Rule 2(e)(2)(A) permits the court to allow the use of
prefiled evidence in a pretrial order under Rule 2(d)(3), subject to
the limitation in subparagraph (B) that, except by agreement or
unless a witness is "unavailable" as provided in V.R.E. 804(a), a
witness must be available for cross-examination at the trial. The
court's pretrial order will determine the scope of any pretrial
evidence to be used and will set the terms of its format and the
schedule for its submission. In effect, for testimonial evidence, the
provision operates as an exception to the hearsay rule. The general
standard, that the evidence must expedite the proceedings without
prejudicing the parties, is taken from 4 V.S.A. § 1003(a). The rule
is a significant departure from Environmental Board practice, in
which prefiled direct and rebuttal testimony were used as matter of
course in virtually every case. As a practical matter, with
discovery available under these rules, the court will be able to
balance the need and cost of discovery against the utility of
prefiled testimony. Thus, the use of direct oral testimony by lay
witnesses and the use of prefiled testimony for expert witnesses,
which may be substantially less costly than depositions, may be
preferable in appropriate cases.
Rule 2(e)(3), consistent with 4 V.S.A. § 1001(g)(4), makes
clear that the court may conduct a site visit or visits as an aid in
reaching a decision. See V.R.E. 611(a). The evidentiary effect of
any matters observed is to be determined in accordance with the
Rules of Evidence. See V.R.E. 401-403; In re Quechee Lakes
Corp., 154 Vt. 543, 551-52, 580 A.2d 957, 961-62 (1990) (findings
may be grounded on knowledge acquired during site visit so long
as observations are not the sole basis for the findings).
Page 1 I
mmary judgment but does not carry with it the time limits and
of specific requirements of V.R.C.P. 56, which, as provided in
Rule )(2), is inapplicable to cases under Rule 4. Consistent
with past ractice, ADR pursuant to V.R.C.P. 16.3 will be ordered
only if the rties agree or the court finds it necessary to "the fair,
economical, a d efficient resolution of the dispute." See
Reporter's Note to Rule 2(d)(x) above. The provisions of 10
V.S.A. § 8012(c) r uire that trial must be held within 30 days of
the receipt of the req st for hearing unless continued for good
cause and that the decisi must be issued within 20 days of the
conclusion of the hearing a d within 60 days of receipt of the
request, unless these times are xtended for good cause. Rules
4(d)(5) and (6) carry forward pro 'sions of former V.R.C.P.
76(d)(2), (5), with added language s cifying the relief available
under 10 V.S.A. § 8012(b).
Rule 4(e) is new. It provides a procedbTe for review of
municipal solid waste orders under 24 V.S.A. § Ir
parallel to
Rule 4(d).
RULE 5. APPEALS
(a) Applicability of Rules.
(1) This rule governs appeals to the Environmental Court from an act or decision
of an appropriate municipal panel pursuant to 24 V.S.A. §§ 4471, 4472; from an act or
decision of the secretary of the agency of natural resources, or a commissioner or
department of the agency, under the provisions of law listed in 10 V.S.A. § 8503(a); from
a district commission, or from a district coordinator jurisdictional opinion, under 10
V.S.A., ch. 151; and from decisions of the secretary of the agency of agriculture, food
and markets pursuant to 6 V.S.A. §§ 4855, 4861.
(2) Except as modified by this rule and by subdivisions (b)-(e) of Rule 2, the
Vermont Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure, so far as applicable, govem all
proceedings under this rule.
(b) Notice of Appeal.
(1) Filing the Notice of Appeal. An appeal under this rule shall be taken by filing
with the clerk of the Environmental Court by certified mail or other means a notice of
appeal containing the items required in paragraph (3) of this subdivision within 30 days
of the date of the act, decision, or jurisdictional opinion appealed from, unless the court
extends the time as provided in Rule 4 of the Vermont Rules of Appellate Procedure. The
Page 18
appellant shall pay to the clerk with the notice of appeal any required entry fee. If a
notice of appeal is mistakenly filed with the tribunal appealed from, or the Natural
Resources Board, or either of its panels or its predecessor boards, the appropriate officer
of the tribunal, board, or panel shall note thereon the date on which it was received and
shall promptly transmit it to the clerk of the Environmental Court, and it shall be deemed
filed with the Environmental Court on the date so noted. Failure of an appellant to take
any step other than the timely filing of the notice of appeal does not affect the validity of
the appeal but is ground only for such action as the court deems appropriate, which may
include dismissal of the appeal.
(2) Cross- or Additional Appeals. If a timely notice of appeal is filed, any other
person entitled to appeal may file a notice of appeal within 14 days of the date on which
the statement of questions is required to be filed pursuant to Rule 5(f), or within the time
otherwise prescribed by this rule, whichever period last expires, unless the court extends
the time as provided in Rule 4 of the Vermont Rules of Appellate Procedure.
(3) Contents of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal must specify the party or
parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party
status; must designate the act, order, or decision appealed from; must name the court to
which the appeal is taken; and must be signed by the appellant or the appellant's attorney.
In addition, the notice of appeal must give the address or location and a description of the
property or development with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the
applicant for any permit involved in the appeal. An appeal will not be dismissed for
informality of form or title of the notice of appeal, or for failure to name a party whose
intent to appeal is otherwise clear from the notice.
(4) Service.
(A) Appeal fr•arn an Appropriate Municipal Panel. Upon the filing of a
notice of appeal from an act or decision of an appropriate municipal panel, the
appellant shall at the same time mail a copy of the notice of appeal to the clerk or
other appropriate officer of the panel. Upon receipt of the copy of the notice of
appeal, the clerk or other officer shall, within five working days, provide to the
appellant a list of interested persons, with instructions to serve a copy of the
notice upon each of them by certified mail. A copy of the notice shall thereupon
be served by the appellant by certified mail upon each interested person.
(B) Appeal fr-onz the Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources, a
District Commission, or. a District Coordinator. Upon the filing of a notice of
appeal from an act or decision of the secretary of the agency of natural resources,
a district commission, or a district coordinator, the appellant shall serve a copy of
the notice of appeal in accordance with Rule 5 of the Vermont Rules of Civil
Procedure upon the secretary, district commission, or district coordinator as
appropriate and upon any party by right as defined in 10 V.S.A. § 8502(5), the
Page 19
Natural Resources Board, and every other person to whom notice of the filing of
an appeal is required to be given by 10 V.S.A. § 8504(c) or (e), as appropriate. In
addition, if the appeal is from an act or decision of the secretary or a district
commission, the appellant shall publish a copy of the notice of appeal not more
than 10 days after serving the notice as required under this subparagraph, at the
appellant's expense, in a newspaper of general circulation in the area of the
project which is the subject of the act or decision appealed from.
(C) Appeal from the Secretary of Agriculture. If the appeal is from a
decision of the secretary of the agency of agriculture, food and markets under 6
V.S.A. § 4855, the appellant shall serve a copy of the notice of appeal upon the
secretary. If the appeal is from a decision or ruling of the secretary under 6
V.S.A. § 4861, the appellant shall serve a copy of the notice upon the secretary,
the applicant if other than the appellant, and any person entitled under rules
adopted by the secretary to receive individual notice of an animal waste permit
hearing pursuant to 6 V.S.A. § 4858.
(c) Appearance. An appellant enters an appearance by filing a notice of appeal as
provided in subdivision (b) of this rule. Any other person may enter an appearance within 20
days after the date on which notice of filing of the last notice of appeal to be filed was served, or,
if necessary, published pursuant to subparagraph (b)(4)(B) of this rule, by filing a written notice
of appearance with the clerk and by serving the notice of appearance in accordance with Rule 5
of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure; provided that any person enumerated in 10 V.S.A. §
8504(n)(1)-(3) may file and serve an appearance in a timely fashion. Any other person who has
not previously entered an appearance as provided in this paragraph may enter an appearance by
filing a timely motion to intervene.
(d) Claims and Challenges of Party Status.
(1) Appeals of Interlocutoi)- District Connnission Part}- Status Decisions. Any
parry in a proceeding before a district commission, or any person denied party status in
such a proceeding, may move in the Fnvironmental Court for an appeal of an
interlocutory decision of the district commission granting or denying party status
pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c). The motion, together with a notice of appeal, must be
filed and served as provided in subdivision (b) of this rule within ten days after the
decision of the district commission appealed from, except that the motion and notice need
not be served by publication. The court may grant the motion and hear the appeal if it
determines that review will materially advance the application process before the district
commission. The court shall expedite hearing and determination of the motion and
appeal. The provisions of Rule 2 apply to appeals under this paragraph only as ordered
by the court.
(2) Claims and Challenges of Part), Status in an Appeal from a Final Decision.
An appellant who claims party status as a person aggrieved pursuant to 6 V.S.A. § 4855
Page 20
or 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a) and is not denied that status by 10 V.S.A. § 8504(d)(1), or an
appellant who claims party status as an interested person pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §
8504(b)(1), will be automatically accorded that status when the notice of appeal is filed
unless the court otherwise determines on motion to dismiss a party. An appellant who
claims party status under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(2), (d)(2), or (e)(2) and who has not sought
interlocutory relief pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subdivision must assert that claim by
motion filed with the notice of appeal. Any other person who appears as provided in
paragraph (1) of this subdivision will be accorded party status unless the court otherwise
determines on its own motion, on motion to dismiss a party, or on a motion to intervene.
(e) Stay. Unless the act or decision appealed from is automatically stayed pursuant to 10
V.S.A. § 8504(f)(1) by the filing of the appeal or a stay has been granted by the district
commission pursuant to10 V.S.A. § 6086(f), the court, after the notice of appeal has been filed
may, on its own motion, or on motion of a party, stay the act or decision and make such other
orders as are necessary to preserve the rights of the parties upon such terms and conditions as are
just. When the appeal is from the issuance of a permit pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4449, unless the
decision appealed from is automatically stayed pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8504(f)(1)(B), the permit
shall not take effect until the earlier of 15 days from the date of filing of the notice of appeal or
the date of a ruling by the court under this subdivision on whether to issue a stay.
(0 Statement of Questions. Within 20 days after the filing of the notice of appeal, the
appellant shall file with the clerk of the Environmental Court a statement of the questions that
the appellant desires to have determined. The statement shall be served in accordance with Rule
5 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure. No response to the statement of questions shall be
filed. The appellant may not raise any question on the appeal not presented in the statement as
filed, unless otherwise ordered by the court in a pretrial order entered pursuant to subdivision (d)
of Rule 2. The statement is subject to a motion to clarify or dismiss some or all of the questions.
(g) Trial De Novo; Pretrial Order. All appeals under this rule shall be by trial de
novo, following a pretrial conference and order issued pursuant to subdivision (d) of Rule 2,
except as provided in subdivision (h) of this rule. In an appeal by trial de novo, all questions of
law or fact as to which review is available shall be tried to the court, which shall apply the
substantive standards that were applicable before the tribunal appealed from.
(h) Appeals to the Environmental Court on the Record.
(1) From an Appropriate Municipal Panel.
(A) An appeal from an appropriate municipal panel from which appeals
may be on the record pursuant to 24 V.S.A. §§ 4471 and 4472 shall be governed
by Rules 10-12.1 of the Vermont Rules of Appellate Procedure so far as
applicable and except as modified by this rule. The record on appeal shall consist
of the original papers filed with the municipal panel; any writings or exhibits
considered by the panel in reaching the decision appealed from; the electronic
Page 21
recording of the proceedings certified by the presiding officer of the municipal
panel as the full, true and correct record of the proceedings; and the transcript of
the proceedings if any. Within 30 days after the filing of the notice of appeal, the
clerk or other appropriate officer of the municipal panel shall transmit the papers
and exhibits filed to the clerk of the Environmental Court in the manner provided
in Rule I I(b) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Except as hereinafter provided,
the electronic recording will serve without transcript as the record of the
proceedings on appeal in all matters in which the total elapsed time for all
recorded proceedings does not exceed 12 hours. In such a case, the operator of
the equipment shall send a copy of the electronic recording to the Environmental
Court and shall bill the appellant for the copy.
(B) In any such matter in which a party has ordered a transcript and has
agreed to pay the cost of copies of the transcript for opposing parties and, unless
otherwise ordered by the court, in any matter in which the total elapsed time for
all recorded proceedings exceeds 12 hours, the transcript, ordered and prepared as
provided in subparagraph (C) of this paragraph, will serve as the record of
proceedings.
(C) When a transcript is to be ordered, the party ordering it, within ten
days after filing the notice of appeal, shall send to the municipal panel an order
for a transcript of all parts of the proceedings that are relevant to the issues that
the appellant intends to raise in the statement of questions. A copy of the order
shall be served on the clerk of the Environmental Court and all persons upon
whom copies the notice of appeal have been served pursuant to subdivision (b) of
this rule. It shall thereupon be the responsibility of the municipal panel to cause a
transcript to be made by an individual on a list appointed by the Court
Administrator pursuant to paragraph (8) of Administrative Order No. 19 to
transcribe electronic recordings for use in court proceedings. The party ordering
the transcript shall pay to the municipal panel at the time of ordering the deposit
amount required under Administrative Order No. 28.
(2) Fran the Commissioner of Forests, Parks, and Recreation. An appeal from a
decision of the commissioner of forests, parks, and recreation under 10 V.S.A. § 2625(f)
shall be on the record of the proceedings before the commissioner. Within 30 days after
the filing of the notice of appeal, the commissioner shall transmit the papers and exhibits
filed to the clerk of the Environmental Court in the manner provided in Rule I I (b) of the
Rules of Appellate Procedure. If those proceedings have been electronically recorded, the
provisions of paragraph (1) of this subdivision concerning electronic recording apply.
(i) Remand for Reconsideration. At the request of the tribunal appealed from, the
court, at any time prior to judgment, may remand the case to that tribunal for its reconsideration.
(j) Judgment. The order of the court may affirm, reverse, or modify the decision of the
Page 22
tribunal appealed from, may remand the case for further proceedings consistent with the order of
the court, and may expressly set forth conditions and restrictions with which the parties must
comply.
(k) Appeals to the Supreme Court.
(1) Rules Applicable. Except as modified by this subdivision, the Vermont Rules
of Appellate Procedure, so far as applicable, shall govern all proceedings under this
subdivision.
(2) Filing and Service. An appeal from a decision in a proceeding in the
Environmental Court under this rule shall be taken by filing with the clerk of the
Environmental Court a notice of appeal in the form provided in paragraph (3) of this
subdivision within 30 days of the date of the decision appealed from, unless the
Environmental Court extends the time as provided in Rule 4 of the Rules of Appellate
Procedure. The appellant shall pay to the clerk of the Environmental Court any required
entry fee with the notice of appeal. The appellant shall serve a copy of the notice upon
the clerk of the Supreme Court and upon counsel of record of each person that appeared
in the Environmental Court and held party status at the time when the decision appealed
from was rendered.
(3) Contents of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal must specify the parry or
parties taking the appeal; must designate the judgment, order, or part thereof appealed
from; must name the court to which the appeal is taken; and must be signed by the
appellant or the appellant's attorney. In addition, the notice of appeal must give the
address and a description of the property or development with which the appeal is
concerned and the name of the applicant.for any permit involved in the appeal and must
set forth facts showing that the appellant is entitled to appeal pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §
8505(a)(1) or (2) or shall be accompanied by a motion requesting the Supreme Court to
allow the appeal on the grounds specified in 10 V.S.A. § 8505(a)(3).
(4) Issues on Appeal. An objection that was not raised before the Environmental
Court may not be considered by the Supreme Court, unless the failure or neglect to raise
that objection is excused by the Supreme Court because of extraordinary circumstances.
(5) Interlocutoty Decisions. An appeal from a decision of the Environmental
Court granting or denying party status as provided in subdivision (d) of this rule or
issuing a stay pursuant to subdivision (e) of this rule may be taken before final judgment
as provided in Rule 5 of the Vermont Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Reporter's Notes
Rule 5 is a consolidated rule for all appeals to the
Environmental Court under 10 V.S.A., ch. 220, enacted by Act 115
Page 23
so far as applicable, gov%such oceedings except as modified
by provisions of subdivided for consistency with 10
V.S.A. § 8505 and otherof this rule.
RULE 6. DEFINITIONS
(a) Unless specified to the contrary, or indicated otherwise in the context:
(1)The words "court," "judge," or similar terms, when used in these rules and in
provisions of the Vermont Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure incorporated in these
rules shall mean the Environmental Court or one of the judges of that court.
(2) The word "clerk" when used in these rules and in provisions of the Vermont
Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure incorporated in these rules shall mean the clerk of
the Environmental Court.
(3) The words "case manager" when used in these rules shall mean a case
manager provided to the Environmental Court pursuant to 4 V.S.A. § 1001(f).
(4) The word "tribunal" means an officer, agency, department, board, panel, or
other body from which an appeal lies under these rules.
(b) Other terms used in these rules shall have the meanings ascribed to them in 6 V.S.A.
§§ 4802, 4861; 10 V.S.A. §§ 8002, 8502; and 24 V.S.A. §§ 4303, 4465(b).
Reporter's Notes
Rules 6(a)(1) and (2) make clear that the terms "court" and
similar terms, and the term "clerk," as used in provisions of the
Civil or Appellate Rules that are incorporated in these rules by
reference refer to the Environmental Court and its judge or clerk.
Note that similar provision for the use of these terms in appeals to
the Supreme Court is made in V.R.A.P. 13(b). Rule 6(a)(3) makes
clear that "case manager" refers to the appropriate official of the
Environmental Court provided pursuant to statute. The definition
of "tribunal" in Rule 6(a)(4) is consistent with its use in 10 V.S.A.
§ 8504(h).
Rule 6(b) incorporates statutory definitions of various
critical terms. The term "secretary" as defined in 6 V.S.A. § 4802
for purposes of 6 V.S.A., ch. 215, and the term "a person
aggrieved" as defined in 6 V.S.A. § 4861 are relevant to appeals
under Rule 5. Terms defined in 10 V.S.A. § 8002 that may be
Page 31
relevant to enforcement actions under Rule 4 include "person,"
"permit," "respondent," `secretary," and "violation." Terms
defined in 10 V.S.A. § 8502 that may be relevant to appeals under
Rule 5 include "district commission," "district coordinator,"
"natural resources board," "party by right," "person," "person
aggrieved," and "secretary." Terms defined in 24 V.S.A. § 4303
that may be relevant to appeals under Rule 5 include "appropriate
municipal panel," "legislative body," "municipality," and
"person." The term "interested person" as defined in 24 V.S.A. §
4465(b) is relevant to appeals under Rule 5.
RULE 7. TITLE
These rules may be known and cited as the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court
Proceedings.
Reporter's Notes
The proper abbreviated citation form for these rules is "V.R.E.C.P."
RULE 8. EFFECTIVE DATE
(a) Effective Date. These rules will take effect on February 21, 2005. They govern all
proceedings in actions or appeals brought after they take effect and also all further proceedings
in actions or appeals then pending, except to the extent that in the opinion of the court their
application in a particular action or appeal pending when the rules take effect would not be
feasible or would work injustice, in which event the former procedure applies.
(b) Effective Date of Amendments. Amendments to these rules will take effect on the
day specified in the order adopting them. They govern all proceedings in actions or appeals
brought after they take effect and also all further proceedings in actions or appeals then pending,
except to the extent that in the opinion of the court their application in a particular action or
appeal pending when they take effect would not be feasible or would work injustice, in which
event the former proce dure applies.
Reporter's Notes
This rule is based on V.R.C.P. 86. It makes clear both for
the rules as originally promulgated and for any subsequent
amendments that the court has discretion to mold new provisions
to the circumstances in actions or appeals pending at the effective
date.
Page 32
CITY OF SOUTH BU LINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
February 11, 2005
John Larkin
Larkin Realty
410 Shelburne Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
Re- Spencer Terminal Holdings
Dear Mr. Larkin:
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting
and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting
on Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room,
575 Dorset Street.
If you have any questions, please give us a call.
Sincerely,
Betsy McDonough
Administrative Assistant
Encl.
CITY OF SOUTH BU LINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF LANNE"4O & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
February 11, 2005
Ian Jewkes
Krebs & Lansing
164 Main Street, Suite 201
Colchester, VT 05446
Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings
Dear Mr. Jewkes:
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting
and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting
on Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room,
575 Dorset Street.
If you have any questions, please give us a call.
Sincerely,
Betsy McDonough
Administrative Assistant
Encl.
STEVEN F. STITZEL
PATTI R. PAGE*
ROBERT E.FLETCHER
JOSEPH S. McLEAN
TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE
AMANDA S. E. LAFFERTY
(*ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y)
STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
171 BATTERY STREET
P.O. BOX 1507
BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507
(802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD)
FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119
WRITER'S E-MAIL(ALAFFERTY@FIRMSPF.COM)
WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-2552
February 9, 2005
Jackie Stevens, Clerk
Environmental Court
255 North Main Street, Ste 2
Barre, VT 05641-4145
Re: Appeal of Greco
Docket No.
Dear Jackie:
JILL E. SPINELLI
WILL S. BAKER
In connection with the above -referenced matter, please find
for filing my Entry of Appearance.
I am also writing to inform the Court that, on January 17,
2005, the City of South Burlington Development Review Board voted
to reopen its hearing on the application that is the subject of
this appeal and to reconsider its decision on said application.
Therefore, the Development Review Board still has jurisdiction
over said application.
Please call with questions. Thank you.
Sincerely,
ti� "'d-a
Amanda S. E.
ASEL/br
son5624.cor
Enclosure
CC: Raymond Belair /
Joseph and Mary Greco
David and Heather Main
Kenneth W. and Joanne Perkins
Peter E. and Leslie Black Plumeau
Paul and Cheryl Houchens
Donna Lee
Diane Naomi Roen
Laf fert
STATE OF VERMONT
ENVIRONMENTAL COURT
RE: APPEAL OF GRECO, et al. ) DOCKET NO. 12-1-05 Vtec
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
NOW COMES AMANDA S. E. LAFFERTY, of the firm Stitzel, Page &
Fletcher, P.C., and hereby enters her appearance in the above -
referenced matter by and on behalf of the City of South
Burlington.
DATED at Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State
of Vermont, this 9tn day of February, 2005.
son2065.1iteoa
STITZEL, PAGE &
FLETCHER, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
171BATTERYSTREET
PO. BOX 1507
BURLINGTON, VERMONT
0540E-1507
STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C.
Amanda S. E. Lafferty
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONI' 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
November 5, 2004
Ian Jewkes
Krebs & Lansing
164 Main Street, Suite 201
Essex Junction, VT 05446
Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings
Dear Mr. Jewkes:
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting
and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting
on Tuesday, November 9, 2004 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room,
575 Dorset Street.
If you have any questions, please give us a call.
Sincerely,
Betsy McDonough
Administrative Assistant
Encl.
;S! NO COMMUTE! Learn
$2000-$4000/week from
Call for free message,
',-3475. (AAN CAN)
STORE: Crystals Jewelry
wrch Street upstairs.
able and profitable. Great
. $35,000. 310-6037.
t & found
[T: Have you seen
He's white w/orange
it. Last seen near the
sh Resort area. He's
nissed. 802-583-2204
iouncements
'E ADOPTION:
gay couple seek to
n infant, under age
irs. Couple seeks a
'Je brother of three
sters, now aged 4,
years old. Beautiful
i rural, central
:, set on 30 acres of
/2 ponds and a gar-
pLoyment: Clinical
orker and small busi-
ner.
ail any replies to
bjr33@aot.com
'Y IN JOURNALISM:
,my for Alternative
n, established by
e this one to promote
n the alternative press,
nted journalists and
college seniors and
paid summer writing
t Northwestern
's Medill School of
i. The eight -week pro-
e 19 - August 14,
s to recruit talented
from diverse back -
id train them in maga-
feature writing. Ten
:s will be chosen and
) plus housing and
Nances. For informa-
:he website at
.org/aaj or write for
Lion: Academy for
Journalism,
am University, Medill
Journalism, 1845
d., Evanston, IL
aiL attacademy@
rn.edu. Application
!bruary 11, 2005.
rn University is an
rtunity educator
ter. (AAN CAN)
,DOPTION: Married
seek to adopt an
er age of 2-years.
classified@sevendaysvt.com I SEVEN DAYS I january 26-february 02, 2005 1 Mclassifieds 29B
or write for an application:
Academy for Alternative
Journalism, Northwestern
University, Medill School of
Journalism, 1845 Sheridan Rd,
Evanston, IL 60208. Email
attacademy@northwestern.edu.
Application deadline: February
11, 2005. Northwestern Univer-
sity is an equal opportunity edu-
cator and employer. (AAN CAN)
► entertainment
EXOTICA DANCERS featuring
girls going wild for your next
birthday, bachelor party or fun -
on -one show. 802-658-1464.
New talent welcome.
HOT BODIES: The best in adult
entertainment. Bachelor, bache-
lorette, birthdays, one-on-one
shows. 652-0003.
► professional
SVCS.
AFFORDABLE AUTO REPAIR:
Rust, accidents, painting,
exhaust, brakes, cooling systems,
tune-ups. Free estimates.
$30/hour. Call Paul, 658-0302.
ATTENTION SMALL BUSINESS
OWNERS: Flexible full -service
bookkeeping and QuickBooks10
setup, training and trouble-
shooting to suit your time and
needs. Barb Grogard, 878-6015.
COMPUTER PROBLEMS? Call
VPC Solutions, 434-6539 (Mon -
Sun 7 a.m. - 9 p.m.). Spyware,
viruses, troubleshooting, installa-
tions, upgrades, networking, web
design etc. Visit our website,
www.vermontpcsotutions.com.
► computer svcs.
A+ CERTIFIED COMPUTER
REPAIR by excellent techni-
cians. Low rates, fast turn-
around. Refurbished computers
available. ReCycle North Tech
Services, 266 Pine St.,
Burlington, 658-4143 ext. 23.
COMPUTER REPAIRS AND
UPGRADES: PCs, Macs, network-
ing, web design, tutoring, digi-
CLASSI FI EDSLISTI NGS
► buy this stuff
$1! RECORD SALE $1! 1500 +
Classical LP's, opera, organ, early
music to 20th century. 11 Maple
St., Essex Junction (near Five
Corners). Monday - Saturday,
9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
FREE 4-ROOM DIRECTV SYS-
TEM: Includes standard installa-
tion. 3-months free HBO and
Cinemax. Access to over 225
channels! Limited -time offer.
S&H, restrictions apply. 800-877-
1251. (AAN CAN)
GREAT SUITS for interviews,
new jobs or special occasions.
Many styles and sizes, $10.
Blazers, jackets and wool shirts,
50%u off. SCHIP's Treasure Resale
Shop, 5404 Shelburne Road,
Shelburne. 985-3595.
TAMA ROCK -STAR 5-piece
drumset with Zildjian and Sabian
cymbals. All hardware included.
Asking $650. 802-796-3488 or
srbenjamin@gmaiL.com
TEACHER STUFF: Mostly grades
4-6. Chapter books w/multiple
copies, unit guides, lesson plans,
bulletin board stuff. Excellent
condition. Great for beginning
teacher. Priced individually or
$200 takes all. 864-6094.
TOOLS: Craftsman table saw
(needs new fence), detail sander
by Dremel, old drills by
Shoperaft & Bosch, square fin-
ishing sanders by Dewalt &
Makita, cement laying tools,
assorted hand tools (some
antiques). Please cat[ 233-5621.
► artists wanted
ARTIST MENTOR NEEDED to
work w/a full-time designer/
builder during a two -week work-
shop, February -March. Responsi-
bilities include: reviewing goals,
meeting/faxing during progress
(sometimes daily), making
observations and suggestions. A
well -developed style focusing on
color and pattern and desire to
teach a must. Please be close to
Burlington or have fax machine.
Small stipend avail. Please call if
interested, 233-5621.
► furniture
4 CHAIRS: Dining, wooden
w/wicker seats. Bent wood arms,
incl. nice custom covers. Great
condition. $30O/OBO. Please cal[
233-5621.
COUCH FOR SALE: Floral pat-
tern, excellent condition. Bought
for $1500. Asking $750/OBO.
Cal[ 879-1926.
► free
1988 WELLCRAFT ECLIPSE:
► music services
COSMIC HILL RECORDING:
MIDI and production services.
Years of experience in writing,
playing, recording and produc-
tion. Dedicated to making your
music sound great. $25 per hour.
496-3166. Moretown, VT.
QUESTION MARK PRODUC-
TIONS: Audio engineering/pro-
duction, live sound, recording.
802-578-9356.
► musicians
wanted
DJ: Spirit of Ethan Allen needs
DJ for weddings and parties.
Need person who is entertaining,
knows music and electronics.
802-862-8300.
DRUMMER WANTED:
Industrial/Martial/Heavy.
Influences: Swans, Blood Axis,
Neurosis, etc. Avail. for touring
in Spring '05. 244-5965.
KEYBOARDIST WANTED FOR 5-
PIECE BAND. Originals and cov-
ers. Rock and R & B. For audi-
tion, leave message at 802-
734-0602.
SINGER SEEKS MUSICIANS.
Must be extremely versatile. Dare
to be different and willing to
offend. dicknifken@yahoo.com.
WANTED: LEAD SINGER for
ready gigging local rock band.
Influences: 3 Doors Down, Stone
Temple Pilots and much more.
802-288-1528.
► music instruct.
GUITAR: ALL styles/levels.
Emphasis on developing strong
technique, thorough musician-
ship, personal style. Paul Asbel[
(Unknown Blues Band, Kiliman-
jaro, Sneakers Jazz Band, etc.),
862-7696, www.paulasbeL[.com.
GUITAR: Berklee graduate with
classical background offers Les-
sons in guitar, theory and ear
training. Individualized, step-by-
step approach. I enjoy teaching
all ages/styles/levels. Call Rick
Belford at 864-7195.
GUITAR INSTRUCTION NOW
AVAILABLE at Burlington Guitar
and Amp, 202 Main St., Burling-
ton. Accepting all Levels with
emphasis on improvisation,
technique, ear training and
musicianship. Bob Wagner,
324-2895.
GUITAR LESSONS with Bill
Mullins (Barbacoa, Chrome
Cowboys). All levels and styles
welcome. 310-6013
JOY AND CREATMTY! Classical
Jazz and Free Improvisation
piano lessons. All ages, all Lev-
els. William Michael, 802-899-
6700 or 355-6234.
PUBLIC HEARING
SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVEL-
OPMENT REVIEW BOARD
The South Burlington
Development Review Board will
hold a public hearing at the
South Burlington City Hall
Conference Room, 575 Dorset
Street, South Burlington,
Vermont on February 15, 2005,
at 7:30 P.M. to consider the fol-
lowing:
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Reconsider
preliminary plat application #SD-
04-61 and final plat application
#SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal
Holdings for a planned unit
development consisting of. 1)
construction of a 26,000 sq. ft
distribution and related storage
building with more than 15%
GFA in office use for the same
tenant as 596 Meadowland Drive,
and 2) relocating a 200-foot
wide "no -construction" buffer
from 596 Meadowland Drive to
the property to the south locat-
ed at the end of Dubois Drive.
2. PUBLIC HEARING: Final plat
application #SD-05-03 of Edgar
Welch to amend a planned unit
development consisting of. 1) a
12,590 sq. ft building which
includes one (1) dwelling unit
and is approved for 8996 sq. ft
of retail space, 2594 sq. ft of
general office space, and 1000
sq. ft for retail, general office or
indoor recreational uses, 2) an
1800 sq. ft building approved for
retail or indoor recreational uses,
and 3) an accessory building.
The amendment consists of site
modifications, 340 Dorset Street.
3. PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary
plat application #SD-05-07 and
final plat application #SD-05-08
of Charles & Patricia Shea to
subdivide a 9.14 acre parcel
developed with a single family
dwelling into four (4) lots of
7.01 acres (lot #1), 0.74 acres
(lot #2), 0.69 acres (lot #3), and
0.70 acres (lot 44), 680 Nowland
Farm Road.
John Dinklage, Chairman
South Burlington Development
Review Board
January 26, 2005
► support groups
DON'T SEE A SUPPORT group
here that meets your needs? Call
United Way GET -INFO (a confi-
dential help line) 652-4636,
Monday -Friday, 8:30 a.m. -
4:30 p.m.
WnPvciT v rno QTTn1I F^
l
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
To: South Burlington Development Review Board
From: Brian Robertson, Associate Planner � 1-yu
RE: SD-04-61 and SD-04-64
Date: February 11, 2005
Cc: Ian Jewkes
Agenda #6
Proiect Description
Spencer Terminal Holdings, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting reconsideration
of a preliminary plat and final plat decision for a planned unit development consisting of 1)
construction of a 26,000 sq ft distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the
GFA in office use for the same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot
wide "no -construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south located
at the end of Dubois Drive.
The applicant is requesting reconsideration of condition #15, which was approved as follows:
15) The restrictions on truck vehicle trip ends on the subject property shall be as follows:
12:00 A.M - 5:59A.M.
6:00 A.M. —11:00 P.M
11:01 P.M —11:59
P.M.
Monday
no truck operations
no restrictions
restricted to 6 truck
vehicle trip ends
Tuesday
restricted to 6 truck
no restrictions
restricted to 6 truck
vehicle trip ends
vehicle trip ends
Wednesday
restricted to 6 truck
no restrictions
restricted to 6 truck
vehicle trip ends
vehicle trip ends
Thursday
restricted to 6 truck
no restrictions
restricted to 6 truck
vehicle trip ends
vehicle trip ends
Friday
restricted to 6 truck
no restrictions
restricted to 6 truck
vehicle trip ends
vehicle trip ends
Saturday
restricted to 6 truck
no restrictions
no truck operations
vehicle trip ends
6:00 A.M - 12:00 P.M
no trucking operations
12:01 P.M —11:59 P.M.
Sunday
no truck operations
no truck operations
no truck operations
The applicant has stated that it is concerned about compliance with the approved time limitations
in the case of an emergency or unforeseen event, such as weather —related conditions. The City
Attorney is currently reviewing this request, and will provide the Development Review Board
with the legal parameters to use in making their decision at the meeting.
In addition to the reconsideration, this application has another significant problem. During the
original approval process, the co -applicant of the property to the south (Mary Dubois) sold the
property to another party (John Larkin). This was the property that was receiving the 200' wide
buffer from the property the applicant is proposing to develop. The new owner of the property to
the south has not signed the application as a co -applicant, nor has he indicated he is going to sign
the application. The subject application involves both properties, so without the signature of the
owner of the property to the south, the Development Review Board does not have the jurisdiction
to approve this project. Thus, this project would be denied altogether.
l
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
MEMORANDUM
TO: Interested Persons
FROM: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer
DATE: January 26, 2005
RE: Reconsideration of Spencer Terminal Holdings Application
The Development Review Board received the enclosed'Motion to Reconsider
from the Applicant, Spencer Terminal Holdings, in connection with Preliminary
Plat Application #SD-04-61 and Final Plat Application #SD-04-64. The Board, at
it's 2/18/05 meeting, voted to reconsider their decision in this matter.
A public hearing is being warned (copy enclosed) for Tuesday February 15, 2005
at 7:30 p.m. at which time the Board will determine whether they will make any
change(s) to Condition #15.
JosF_PH D. FALCON
ATTORNEY AT LAW
P. O. BOX 257, 10729 ROUTE 116
HINESBURG, VT 05461
(802) 482-2137
FAX (802) 482-2138
EMAIL Jfallon_Wmadrlver.com
January 4, 2005
VIA EMAIL & FIRST-CLASS MAIL
Mr. John Dinklage, Chair
South Burlington Development Review
Board
575 Dorset Street
So. Burlington, VT 05403
RE: Spencer Terminal Holdings - 596 Meadowland Drive - South Burlington
Development Review Board Findings of Fact & Decision dated 12/22/04
Dear Mr. Dinklage:
I represent Spencer Terminal Holdings.
This letter is by way of respectfully requesting that the Development Review Board
reconsider Paragraph 15 of its Decision concerning restrictions on truck vehicle trip ends and
hours of operation. As noted by my client's representative during the proceedings, it is
imperative that no restrictions be placed on vehicle trip ends and hours of operation in
conjunction with my client's business.
Would you be kind enough to place this matter on your agenda at the earliest possible
date. Should you wish me to notify other interested parties, I would be happy to do so once I
have the appropriate names and addresses.
Thank you for giving this matter your kind attention.
Very yours,
Joseph D. Fallon
JDF:sjl
cc: Mr. William Spencer, Spencer Terminal Holdings
Mr. Ian Jewkes, Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Mr. Raymond Belair, City of South Burlington
Joseph D. Fallon
P.O. Box 257
Hinesburg, VT 05461
Marie Dubois
1405 Hinesburg Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
Munson Earth Moving
85 Shunpike Road
Williston, VT 05495
Larry & Ginette Brainard
28 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Anthony & Diane Graziano
34 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
John & Susan Hood
28 Dubois Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
John Larkin
410 Shelburne Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
Mark Neagley
113 Heritage Lane
Shelburne, VT 05482
Mark Behr
38 Moss Glen Lane
South Burlington, VT 05403
Summer Ice Joint Venture
153 Summit Street
Burlington, VT 05401
Thomas E. Chase
PO Box 2283
South Burlington, VT 05407
Diane J. Wessel
70 Highland Terrace
South Burlington, VT 05403
Donna Lee
30 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Paul & Charyl Houchens
36 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Robert & Linda O'Kelly
30 Dubois Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
Peter Plumeau
33 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Elaine & Michael O'Grady
31 Dubois Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
Jon Wilkinson
434 Shelburne Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
Green Acres, Inc.
PO Box 2123
South Burlington, VT
Scott & Roberta Pennington
26 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Nicholas & Juli Beth Hinds
32 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
David & Heather Main
38 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Ralph & Jeanette Mitchell
32 Dubois Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
Ian Jewkes
Krebs & Lansing
164 Main Street
Colchester, VT 05446
Ken Perkins
39 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
PLEASE PRINT CLEA RL Y!!!!!
NAME ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST
Alt
Blue,& (f#,jrrm4,y
Pk-ea-r,..,r "-.
0/7
soco --V
e
io c-Qc-> t4 n t. zd7L,-"
ILA Ud f-CeAj
3's F<Vkof# Urcl�,
-/—e-VWA-tr�
iA6,/c-,Ke4%s
11(o
-1) P,\j �'l YA 0,J
38
40 k V•�ae cfe-r
o 5 -L, z.,o
Ll o
x
/(,,V /Miv 64c,)-J. Vl-,
17)6- ulp., 5,-,o
SG odLT7t,5m(:,7—
c
fJef-K
Tt?ju t.- tj"\I,
Chas �.e.
4fr-;Ver
SIGN IN SHEET
MEETING..
DATE
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY!!!!!
NAME ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST
4Z
Alo .4 ke
Z"
c'
� w-d&l:
—k 7 -1
--tax. 44�1217jee
-ki-
:2a Z3g12kle4' sfi
�' , tj
P,.,,re Cr-
G(LL Scqkveht-:K
ro. Box (lqo Qv xw" 6T04) J)S402.
lb S'ls -r r" -A r LoKe.
lezlx--7)
ale" illy
70AIV VITI
-03 06-eeZeY .5
T fn d ti %//;4.'jAj4rY Cor4a4z$J
so T
L3 V, ±ck-,
00,
'I Viv a Lt- r, i er. Le.
spF'Q ex. 0- TUA 1 w4y,
SIGN JN SHEET
MEET!NG:'_,DeN'EL_C�V-�E' G �
DATE: 0- 9' (DA
PLEASC PRINT CLE,4RLY!!!!!
NAME ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST
r;J}tJ :16i/y1 i
-21
8
x1`I
-A a •"
6 Li
.a
C' S.
r
36 L /
J
tL.._
Sy
r4
itt+i7✓"
l`, 1� 1 r'f•LY
f 1
_I �i�R,�,(I, D I-�! dT-
,J�
Va,rI 2,• o.
, fi'SY�,+,iY1V dtif`•%wit 'ui'a�
I
JOSEPH D. FAI EON
ATTORNEY AT LAW
P. O. BOX 257, 10729 ROUTE 116
HINESBURG, VT 05461
(802) 482-2137
FAX (802) 482-2138
EMAIL JfallOn@madriver.cOm
January 4, 2005
VIA EMAIL & FIRST-CLASS MAIL
Mr. John Dinklage, Chair
South Burlington Development Review
Board
575 Dorset Street
So. Burlington, VT 05403
RE: Spencer Terminal Holdings - 596 Meadowland Drive - South Burlington
Development Review Board Findings of Fact & Decision dated 12/22/04
Dear Mr. Dinklage:
I represent. Spencer Terminal Holdings.
This letter is by way of respectfully requesting that the Development Review Board
reconsider Paragraph 15 of its Decision concerning restrictions on truck vehicle trip ends and
hours of operation. As noted by my client's representative during the proceedings, it is
imperative that no restrictions be placed on vehicle trip ends and hours of operation in
conjunction with my client's business.
Would you be kind enough to place this matter on your agenda at the earliest possible
date. Should you wish me to notify other interested parties, I would be happy to do so once I
have the appropriate names and addresses.
Thank you for giving this matter your kind attention.
4Y,
urs,
Joseph D. Fallon
JDF:sjl
cc: Mr. William Spencer, Spencer Terminal Holdings
Mr. Ian Jewkes, Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Mr. Raymond Belair, City of South Burlington
C
MEMORANDUM
To: Development Review Board
From: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer
Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings, #SD-04-61 and SD-04-64
Date: December 10, 2004
Deliberations on the above referenced project will continue at 8:00 pm on Tuesday,
December 14th in the small upstairs conference room. Enclosed is a copy of the draft
decision which includes the changes agreed upon at the last meeting. I have not yet
received Amanda's changes.
CITY of SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT of PLANNING & ZONING
SPENCER TERMINAL HOLDINGS - 596 MEADOWLAND DRIVE
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD-04-61
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-04-64
FINDINGS of FACT & DECISION
Spencer Terminal Holdings, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking preliminary
and final plat approval for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) construction of a
26,000 sq ft distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in
office use for the same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot
wide "no -construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south
located at the end of Dubois Drive. The Development Review Board held public
hearings on September 21, 2004, October 19, 2004 and November 9, 2004. Ian Jewkes
represented the applicant.
Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearings and the plans and
supporting materials in the document file for this application, the Development Review
Board finds, concludes, and decides the following:
FINDINGS of FACT
The applicant is seeking preliminary and final plat approval for a planned unit
development consisting of: 1) construction of a 26,000 sq ft distribution and
related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the
same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no -
construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south
located at the end of Dubois Drive.
2. The owners of record of the subject properties are Summer Ice Joint Venture and
Marie Dubois.
3. The subject properties are located in the Industrial & Open Space (10) Zoning
District, the North Scenic View Protection Overlay District and the Southeast
Quadrant Zoning District.
4. The plans consist of an ten (2) page set of plans, page two (2) entitled, "PUD Plat
Meadowland Business Park Lands of Homer and Marie Dubois Meadowland
Drive South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting
Engineers, Inc., dated October 16, 2004.
- 1 -
Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements
Table 1. Dimensional Requirements
10 Zoning District
Required
Proposed
A Min. Lot Size
3 acres
20.2 acres
A Max. Density
n/a
n/a
A Max. Building Coverage
30%
2.7%
Max. Overall Coverage
50%
19.8%
Min. Front Setback
50 ft.
50 ft.
Min. Side Setback
35 ft.
280 ft.
Min. Rear Setback
50 ft.
200 ft.
A Max. Building Height
_
35 ft.
24 ft.
zoning compliance
n/a no residential units proposed
SUBDIVISION CRITERIA
Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations,
subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions:
Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the
needs of the project.
According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the
existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of
water, at acceptable pressure.
The entire Meadowland Business Park has an approved water allocation, which applies to
this proposed project. In addition, the water infrastructure has already been installed, so it is
only a matter of connecting this building to the system.
The Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department is in the process of
reviewing the plans. His comments should be available for the meeting.
According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the
subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community
wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot
wastewater is proposed. The subdivision received a 30,345 gallon per day sewer
allocation. This allocation is still in effect.
Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction
to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions
on the subject property and adjacent properties.
The proposed grading plan is outlined on sheet SP-3 of the plans and the erosion control
details are outlined on sheet D-3 of the plans.
-2-
The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies
sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads.
Access to this property is proposed via two (2) access drives off of Meadowland Drive: a
26' wide drive on the westerly side of the proposed building and a 24' wide drive on the
easterly side of the proposed building. Both of these access drives are proposed for
ingress and egress. The two proposed access drives are at least 400' apart, which is
compliance with Section 15.12(E) of the Land Development Regulations.
Pursuant to Section 15.12(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the
easterly access drive should be aligned with Bowdoin Street, on the opposite side of
Meadowland Drive.
The proposed truck parking lots are very large to accommodate the large trucks this site will
cater to. Therefore, circulation on the site will not be an issue.
According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 71h Edition, the 18,500 square feet of
distribution and related storage space is estimated to generate 15.17 P.M. peak hour tip
ends (Land Use 30). The 7,500 square feet of office space is estimated to generate 11.18
P.M. peak hour trip ends. Thus, the total project is estimated to generate 26.25 P.M. peak
hour trip ends.
The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands,
streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique
natural features on the site.
The subject property does not contain any identified wildlife habitat. However, the site does
contain a pond and some wetlands. The wetlands are delineated on the plan dated October
16, 2004. The Natural Resources Committee (NRC) reviewed the proposed project at its
meeting on November 4, 2004. The NRC recommended approval with the following
conditions:
1. the applicant shall plant a vegetative delineation along the wetland buffer on the
easterly side of the subject property;
2. the applicant shall mitigate the wetland impacts by adding 700 sq. ft. of constructed
wetland to the existing Class III wetland on the easterly side of the subject property,
3. there shall be no development within any of the wetlands or wetland buffers, except
for the proposed encroachment into the Class II I wetland buffer adjacent to the
northerly property boundary;
4. there shall be no mowing or planting within the wetlands or wetland buffers;
5. there shall be no pesticide or herbicide application within the wetland or wetland
buffers;
6. the detention pond shall be designed to maximize pollutant removal,
7. the applicant shall set-up annual water quality testing including a base -line test, to
ensure that pollutants are not accumulating in any of the wetlands;
8. the applicant shall implement a mechanism to contain fuel spills;
9. the applicant shall submit confirmation from the wetland expert as to whether the
wetlands on the easterly side of the property are indeed Class III and whether any
wetlands or wetland buffers on the property to the south extend onto the subject
property.
-3-
The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development
patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the
zoning district(s) in which it is located.
According to Section 6.04(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Industrial -Open
Space l0 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot
office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial
routes and Burlington International Airport. The /0 District regulations and standards are
intended to allow high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open
character of the district, minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and
enhance the visual quality of approaches to the City while providing'` suitable locations for
employment and business growth. The location and architectural design of buildings in a
manner that preserves these qualities is strongly encouraged.
The proposed project is in compliance with the stated purpose of the IO District, as outlined
in the Land Development Regulations.
Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize
opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or
stream buffer areas.
There are significant portions of open space running along the western and eastern
portions of the property, so staff feels this requirement is met.
The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee)
to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided.
The Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated
9/29/04.
Roads,
and lig,
such s
otion paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines
have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of
rs and infrastructure to adjacent landowners.
The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the westerly side of
the proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate
pedestrian and recreation traffic through the property. This pedestrian easement is being
relocated to the south within the planned unit development.
Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner
that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards.
The subdivision plans for the entire Meadowland Business Park show details on utilities,
lighting, and stormwater management. These have been approved by the City Engineer,
so they are acceptable for the proposed project.
A lighting point by point plan for the proposed project is contained on sheet SP-5 of the
plans, which meets the requirements in Appendices A.9 and A.10 of the Land Development
Regulations. In addition, the applicant submitted exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the
M
proposed lighting. The proposed lighting fixtures are in compliance with Appendix D of the
Land Development Regulations.
The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan
for the affected district(s).
The proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington
Comprehensive Plan.
SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS
Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall
require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards
for all site plan applications:
The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site,
from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian
movement, and adequate parking areas.
The applicant's building elevation plans are on sheet A-1 of the plans. The proposed
building accomplishes a desirable transition from structure to site and from structure to
structure.
The site includes a 20' wide pedestrian easement that will help facilitate pedestrian
movement. In addition, there is an existing recreation path running along Meadowland
Drive. Therefore, no additional sidewalks are necessary on the property.
According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the
18,500 square feet of building dedicated to warehousing, processing storage, and
distribution requires 9.25 parking spaces. The 7.500 square feet of building dedicated to
office use will require 26.25 parking spaces. Thus, the proposed project will require a total
of 36 parking spaces (rounded up from 35.5). The plans show a total of 67 parking spaces
in the main parking lot, adjacent to Meadowland Drive. According to Table 13-7 of the
Land Development Regulations, a property with 51 to 75 parking spaces requires three (3)
handicapped -accessible parking spaces. The plans only depict two (2) handicapped -
accessible spaces. In addition to the 67 standard parking spaces, the plans also depict 28
parking spaces for trucks on the rear portion of the property.
The dimensions of the proposed parking areas meet the requirements in Table 13-8 of the
Land Development Regulations.
Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for
employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is proposed in the parking lot to
the west of the proposed building.
Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent
practicable.
The majority of the proposed parking is located in the front of the building.
-5-
Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height
and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining
buildings.
The scale of the proposed building is compatible with the site and existing buildings in the
area. The height of the proposed building is 27.5', which is in compliance with the Land
development Regulations.
The proposed project is located in a business park in a area where industrial uses exists,
so staff feels the scale of the proposed building is compatible with existing buildings in the
area.
Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior
alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground.
Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines
services, and service modifications shall be underground.
The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and
architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions
to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles.
This requirement is being met.
Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to
existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the
proposed structures.
This requirement is being met.
In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the
following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development
Requlations:
The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to
abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts
onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or
other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area.
The proposed project is nestled between the wetlands on the site. In order to provide any
access to adjacent properties; wetland encroachments would be necessary. Because the
project is in a large lot, industrial area, the Board does not feel access to adjacent
properties is necessary. However, if the property to the south is going to be developed with
residential units, as second means of access, most likely through this property, will be
required. This would require an access easement connecting the property to the south with
Meadowland Drive.
Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall
be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so
as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site.
-6-
Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines,
services, and service modifications shall be underground.
All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with
any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly
screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the
enclosure(s).
The plans show a solid waste facility on the easterly side of the proposed building, which is
adequately screened.
Landscaping and Screening Requirements
According to Table 13-9 of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed project has a
minimum landscaping requirement of $14,500. The applicant is proposing $23,170 worth
of landscaping, which includes eighteen (18) Austrian Pines on the property to the south.
The landscape plan and landscape budget are in compliance with Section 13.06 of the
Land Development Regulations.
Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street
parking area with twenty (20) of more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the
interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. At
least one (1) major deciduous shade tree, whose caliper is equal to or greater than two
and one-half (2.5) inches when measures six (6) inches above ground at the time of
planting, shall be provided within each parking area for every three thousand (3,000)
square feet of paved area or every ten (10) parking spaces, whichever is greater.
The landscaping plan for the off- street parking area is in compliance with Section
13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations.
Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area
must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off.
The plans depict a snow storage area along the southern boundary of the property.
Pursuant to Section 13.06(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations,
any utility cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the
Development Review Board.
The applicant is proposing a screened HVAC pad to the east of the proposed building.
The City Arborist reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated
10/4/04.
-7-
View Protection Zone
The applicant shall submit information on the height of the proposed building in relation
to mean sea level, prior to final plat approval.
Other
The City Engineer reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated
September 9, 2004.
DECISION
Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Development Review Board
hereby approves preliminary plat application #SD-04-61 and final plat application #SD-
04-62 of Spencer Terminal Holdings, subject to the following conditions:
1) All previous approvals and stipulations shall remain in full effect, except as amended
herein.
2) This project shall be completed as shown on the plans submitted by the applicant, as
amended by this decision, and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning
& Zoning.
3) The plat plans shall be revised to show the following changes and shall require
approval from the Administrative Officer. Four (4) copies of the approved revised
plat plans shall be submitted to the Administrative Officer prior to recording:
a) The plans should be revised to depict a total of three (3) handicapped parking
spaces.
b) Sheet SP-1 of the plans shall be revised to correct the owner and co -applicant
address information for Summer Ice Joint Venture. These addresses are labeled
as Summit Street in South Burlington, which doesn't exist.
c) SheetSP-1 of the plans shall be revised so that the parking calculation
information corresponds with the Land Development Regulations.
d) The plat plans shall be revised to show a vegetative delineation along the wetland
buffer on the easterly side of the subject property.
e) The plat plans shall be revised to mitigate the wetland impacts by adding 700 sq. ft.
of constructed wetland to the existing Class III wetland on the easterly side of the
subject property.
f) The plat plans shall be revised to incorporate the recommendation of the city
Arborist in his memo of 10/4/04.
g) The plans shall be revised to add 10 to 12 foot high berms with evergreen trees on
top with a minimum height of four (4) feet, at the southwest corner of the property,
westerly of detention pond "A".
h) The plans shall be revised to align the easterly access drive opposite Bowdoin
Street and add curbs along the east side of the access drive.
4) The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Engineer, as outlined in his
memorandum dated September 9, 2004.
5) The applicant shall comply with the requests of the Fire Chief, as outlined in his
memorandum dated 9/29/04.
6) There shall be no development within any of the wetlands or wetland buffers, except for
the proposed encroachment to the existing Class I II wetland on the easterly side of the
subject property.
7) There shall be no mowing or planting within the wetlands or wetland buffers.
8) There shall be no pesticide or herbicide application within the wetland or wetland
buffers.
9) The detention pond shall be designed to maximize pollutantremoval as required by the
Vermont Stormwater Regulations. Certification from a licensed engineer that it meets
the state requirements shall be submitted prior to permit issuance.
10) The applicant shall set up annual water quality testing, including a base -line test, to
ensure that pollutants are not accumulating in any of the wetlands. The results of these
annual tents shall be submitted to the Administrative Officer as soon as the results are
available.
11) The use of "Jake Brakes" by any vehicle going to or from the subject property on
Meadowland Drive is prohibited.
12) There shall be no idling of trucks for periods in excess of five (5) minutes on the subject
property.
13) There shall be no use of a "back-up beeper" on any vehicle on the subject property
between the hours of 10:00 pm and 7:00 am.
14) There shall be no refrigerated trucks used or stored on the subject property.
15) Prior to any change in tenant or additional tenant on the subject property, approval for
an amended planned unit development shall be obtained from the Development
Review Board.
16) The proposed use shall be limited to the following hours of
operation
17) Weekday truck traffic, between the hours of 11:00 P.M. and 6:00 A. M., shall be limited
to a maximum number of 6 vehicle trip ends.
18) Saturday operation of the use on the property shall be limited to 6:00 A.M. to 12:00
noon.
19) The use shall not operate from 12:00 noon Saturday until &00 A.M. Monday.
20) Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit a plan to the Administrative Officer
to reduce light intensity at night by the use of dimmers, timers, and/or motion sensors.
21) The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in
Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the
grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington
Land Development Regulations.
22) The applicant shall record in the land records legal documents related to the new
location of the pedestrian easement, approved by the City Attorney, prior to permit
issuance.
23) Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility
lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground.
24) The applicant shall demonstrate to the Administrative, Officer compliance with the
view protection zone limitations for the proposed building, prior to permit issuance.
25) The applicant shall post a $14,500 landscape bond, prior to issuance of a zoning
permit. This bond shall remain in effect for three(3) years to assure that the
landscaping has taken root and has a goad chance of surviving.
26) For the purposes of calculating traffic impact fees under the South Burlington Impact
Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the project will
generate 26.25 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour.
27) All new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change
to approved lights shall require approval of the Administrative Officer prior to the
installation.
28) Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval of the South Burlington
Development Review Board.
29) The final plat plans (PUD plat and sheet SP-1) shall be recorded in the land records
within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the
Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording.
John Dinklage
Roger Farley
Michele Kupersmith
-10-
Larry Kupferman
Gayle Quimby
Signed the day of December, 2004.
Please note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental
Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRCP 76 in writing, within 30 days of the date this
decision is issued. The fee is $225.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to
challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long.
You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy;
finality).
- 11 -
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
18 JANUARY 2005
The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on
Tuesday, 18 January 2005, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575
Dorset St.
Members Present: J. Dinklage, iChair; L. Kupferman, M. Kupersmith, G. Quimby, R.
Farley
Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; B. Robertson, Associate Planner; D.
Bruce, D. Burke, M.Feitelberg, M.Gravelin, F. Peet, V. Solai, A. Portz, P. Dimmer, W.
Elliott, J. Fay, L. Llewellyn, D. Henson, S. Baker, Mr. & Mrs. Diemer
L' Other Business:
Mr. Belair presented a request from Spencer Terminal Holdings to reopen the hearing on
the application approved a few weeks ago. They have issues with Condition #15. In
addition, the property to the south, where the 200 foot buffer was moved to, had been
owned by Marie Dubois. During the review process, that property was sold to John
Larkin. The Board cannot impose a condition on his property when he was not a party to
the process.
Mr. Belair suggested a date of 15 February for the reopening of the hearing. At that time,
( the Board can make or not make any changes. Also, Mr. Larkin would have to agree to
be part of the application so a condition could be put on his property. If he will not agree,
the Board would have to deny the application.
Mr. Dinklage noted the original approval was not a unanimous decision.
Members generally favored re -opening the hearing.
Ms. Quimby moved to reconsider the Findings of Fact and Decision of the Development
Review Board dated 22 December 2004, rendered in the Preliminary Plat Application
#SD-04-61 and Final Plat Application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings, 596
Meadowland Drive, in order that the Development Review Board may determine if it had
jurisdiction to consider, as part of that application, property now owned by John Larkin,
Inc., and to hear the applicant's request to have the Board reconsider Stipulation #15 of
the approval motion. Ms. Kupersmith seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
2. Minutes of 21 December 2004:
Mr. Kupferman moved to approve the Minutes of 21 December 2004 as written. Mr.
Farley seconded. Motion passed 4-0 with Ms. Quimby abstaining.
- 1 -
r
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGri ON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
December 23, 2004
Ian Jewkes
Krebs & Lansing
164 Main Street, Suite 201
Colchester, VT 05446
Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings
Dear Mr. Chase:
Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above
referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board
on December 21, 2004 (effective 12/22/04). Please note the conditions of
approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the
land records within 90 days (must be submitted by 3/15/05) of this approval or
this approval is null and void.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Betsy Mc-Donough, Administrative Assistant
Encl.
l
CITY OF SOUTH BT.JRLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
December 8, 2004
Ian Jewkes
Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc.
164 Main Street
Colchester, VT 05446
Re: Minutes
Dear Mr. Jewkes:
Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the November 9, 2004
Development Review Board meeting.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Betsy McDonough
Administrative Assistant
Encl.
sowcer
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
9 NOVEMBER 2004
3. Consent Agenda:
a. Design Review Application #DR-04-08 of South Burlington Realty
Company for design review approval for the following exterior
modifications: 1) fill-in overhead door areas on south and east sides to
match existing metal siding, and 2) resurface roof with a membrane roof
system, 40 San Remo Drive:
No issues were raised.
Mr. Boucher moved to approve Design Review Application 4DR-04-09 subject to the
stipulations in the staff recommendations. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed
unanimously.
b) Design Review Application 4DR-04-10 of Dorset Communications, LLC,
for a new Master Signage Permit, so that future tenants are able to receive sign
permits, and for approval of a sign in gold, red, black and white, 372 Dorset Street:
Mr. Boucher moved to approve Design Review Application 4DR-04-10 subject to the
Stipulations in the staff recommendations. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed
unanimously.
4. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-61 and
Final Plat Application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings for a
planned unit development consisting of: 1) constructing a 26,000 sq. ft.
distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in
office use for the same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a
200 foot wide "no construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the
property to the south located at the end of Dubois Drive:
Mr. Boucher stepped down during this hearing due to a conflict of interest.
Mr. Dinklage stressed that the 2 properties will be tied together as one PUD.
Mr. Jewkes indicated they have delineated the wetland on the plan. The Natural
Resources Committee has made some recommendations, and the applicant has no
problem complying with them.
Mr. Dinklage asked where they will add to additional wetland space. Mr. Jewkes showed
an area outside of all the buffers.
Mr. Jewkes noted there were also noise concerns raised by neighbors. Mr. Dinklage
noted this is a specifically identified allowable use in this district.
Mr. Dinklage asked if there is a connector to the east on the Official City Map. Mr.
Belair replied that there used to be. It stops at Muddy Brook.
-1)-
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
9 NOVEMBER 2004
With regard to the noise issue, Mr. Dinklage suggested not allowing "jake brakes" on the
downgrade. Mr. Spencer said that is do -able as most trucks don't have them. Mr.
Dinklage also asked about a 5 minute time limit for idling. Mr. Spencer said that's
standard procedure, and their trucks are programmed to shut down in 5 minutes. He also
noted they have only one truck with a "back-up" beeper which could be removed. He
agreed that they would not use this between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.
Mr. Belair noted receipt of a call from a City Council member about limiting the hours of
operation to 7 a.m.-7 p.m.
Mr. Dinklage raised the question of some forest land that is dying due to standing water. -
Mr. Jewkes said it seems like pretty good cover at the moment. Ms. Main said there are a
lot of dead trees in there now, mostly evergreens. Mr. Jewkes then showed additional
trees that will be planted along the border with the Munson property and landscaping to
keep people out of the buffer zone. Mr. Dinklage noted that residents are asking for
berms, and he suggested a berm to the south. Mr. Jewkes agreed to this.
Mr. Plumeau asked about hours of lighting at the facility and asked that they be turned
off between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. He cited an increase in light pollution.
Mr. Plumeau also noted that his reading of the regulations indicates that this area is not
supposed to accommodate this kind of use. He noted that this is the kind of use that
could attract similar uses, and he questioned whether this is what the city wants bordering
the Southeast Quadrant. He added that residents are very concerned about their quality of
life.
Mr. Dinklage said this development has less impact than what could be there. Mr.
Plumeau responded that this is a very different type of use than anything else in the area.
He also felt it will be many years before there is a Hinesburg Rd. interchange.
Ms. Lee said she didn't see any trees on the south and west of where trucks will be
parked, and many houses look down into that area. She also noted that there is now a
beeper that goes all day long from the quarry, and lights from the existing building shine
directly into her bedroom all night long. Mr. Belair said he would look into that..
Ms. Quimby asked if the business operates on weekends. Mr. Spencer said they are
pretty well closed from about 10 a.m. Saturday to Monday morning, although there may
be an odd truck that comes in.
Mr. Dinklage showed an area for a possible berm. Mr. Jewkes felt that was possible.
Ms. Quimby asked if they have any refrigeration trucks and noted that one behind her
property runs all day and all night. Mr. Spencer said they do not have any refrigeration
trucks. Mr. Bolton noted that if this property were sold in the future, the buyer could
-3-
t
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
9 NOVEMBER 2004
have refrigeration trucks. He suggested a stipulation that would prohibit refrigeration
trucks.
Mr. Behr asked if it's possible to have less light at night. Mr. Spencer said they are a 24-
hour operation. Mr. Belair noted the applicant is within the allowable light for the
property. He also noted that from a safety point of view, police like to see more lighting.
Mr. Dinklage suggested turning off the 2 big pole lights after 9 p.m.
Mr. Perkins asked how the applicant defines "sparse activity" at night. Mr. Spencer said
about 3 trucks a night a few days a week; other days, nothing.
Mr. Plumeau raised the question of mixing truck traffic into Hinesburg Rd. traffic.
Trucks have very different characteristics. There are also school buses driving those peak
hours. He felt that hasn't been adequately addressed. He felt the figures being used a
number of years old and that since then things have changes. The Comprehensive Plan
says there should be no "truck -intensive" uses there as they are inappropriate for that
area.
Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant if there are hours they don't have to operate. Mr.
Spencer said they have to operate 24 hours a day. Mr. Dinklage cited the Hannaford
situation where Hannafords was required to put up sound fences and limit their hours of
operation. He felt this issue can be revisited if the applicant is not living within the noise
ordinance.
Ms. Main cited the concern with being awakened on summer nights when windows are
open. She felt this use will affect the quality of life of residents.
Mr. Plumeau noted there is a forecast of a great increase in truck traffic in coming years.
He felt there is no way truck traffic in and out of this facility won't increase.
Ms. Kupersmith noted that one criteria for PUD approval is conformity with the goals of
the Comprehensive Plan, and that question has been raised with regard to this plan. Mr.
Dinklage felt it might be prudent to have a discussion with the City Attorney on that
issue.
A resident noted that Hinesburg Rd/Kennedy Drive is not "truck friendly" and felt there
will be a backup of cars and trucks in the a.m. peak hour.
Mr. Chase, owner of the adjacent development, CBA, said he is comfortable with the
amount of traffic his business and the applicant's will generate. Regarding noise, he said
the prevailing wind is from the south, and there will be more noise from aircraft than
from Spencer's business. Mr. Chase also said he didn't realize there was a problem with
any of their lights, and he would look into this.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
9 NOVEMBER 2004
Mr. Perkins said he personally saw the destruction of a Massachusetts town when a
business like this came in. He said it started small like this one and then took over the
whole area. He asked if this is what people really want South Burlington to be.
Mr. Bolton asked if this is a "squeaky clean" applicant. Mr Belair said it meets the regs
dimensionally, with setbacks, coverage, etc. No waivers are being sought. He was not
sure about such subjective things as compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Belair also noted that in the set of plans received today, the access drive is no longer
directly opposite Bowdoin Drive. Mr. Jewkes explained this is related to a request from
the Natural Resources Committee because of wetlands concern. He suggested that if they
put a curb on the road to keep water out of the wetland, they could align the accesses.
Board members preferred to have the accesses aligned.
Ms. Quimby asked if there would be traffic other than the applicant's trucks. Mr.
Spencer said rarely there is a customer pick-up, but mostly it is their trucks and
employees vehicles.
Ms. Quimby then moved to close the public hearing. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion
passed unanimously.
5. Site Plan Application #SP-04-37 of CCTA for reconstruction and relocation
of a bus shelter, 550 Dorset Street:
Mr. Belair said he had no issues.
Mr. Peterson said this shelter replaces one previously proposed to accommodate the
wishes of the school. He asked to waive the appeal time. Mr. Belair said this can't be
done as he can't issue a permit until the appeal time is expired.
Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plat Application #SP-04-37 of CCTA subject to the
stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
6. Site Plan Application 4SP-04-42 of CCTA for reconstruction of a bus shelter,
1185 Shelburne Road:
No issues were raised.
Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-04-42 of CCTA subject to the
stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
7. Site Plan Application #SP-04-43 of Champlain Water District to amend a
previously approved site plan for a water treatment plant, chemical storage
facility, maintenance garage, and other accessory facilities. The amendment
consists of constructing a 343 sq. ft. office addition, 403 Queen City Park
Road:
-5-
Landscape Review 10/04/04
Corporate Headquarters Land Air
Krebs and Lansing Engineers
Species Selection
Both Red Maple and Ash are over planted species in the city of South Burlington.
Substitute species should be used. Some possibilities include:
l . Kentucky Coffeetree, Gymnocladus dioicus
2. Amur Corktree, Phellodendron amurense
3. American Elm `Princeton' or `Valley Forge', Ulmus Americana Princeton' or
`Valley Forge'
4. Prospector Elm, Ulmus wilsoniana `Prospector'
5. Ginkgo, Ginkgo biloba
6. Honeylocust, Gleditsia triacanthos
Japanese flowering crabapples located by the front entrance will outgrow this location
quickly and will require extensive pruning to maintain clearance over the sidewalk
Planting Details
Planting details and specifications should be included with plans
Sout�
September 29, 2004
Burlington Fire Department
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
(802) 846-4110
Douglas S. Brent, Fire Chief
Ms. Juli Beth Hinds, Director of Planning and Zoning
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: Spencer Terminal
Dear Juli:
I have reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of the Spencer Terminal
on Meadowland Drive. I have also made a site visit to view where this building will be
sited. The preliminary plans seem to be OK and I have the following recommendations:
1. Compliance with all requirements of Vermont Labor and Industry Fire Prevention
Division codes and standards.
2. Automatic sprinklers and alarm system as required by Vermont Labor and
Industry Fire Prevention Division, building and garage.
3. Fire Department Sprinkler Connection per code, location to be specified by
SBFD.
4. Fire Alarm panel and annunciator panel location to be specified by SBFD.
5. Provide an emergency key box, location to be specified by SBFD.
6. 1 recommend that two new fire hydrants be installed, one on each side of the
building located about half way down.
At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this
project moves forward additional items may surface which could be dealt with as needed
with the assistance of the developer and Labor and Industry.
Page - 2
Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact
me.
cerely,
Douglas S. Brent
Fire Chief
BILL SZYMANSKI, City Engineer
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
846-4io6 (phone) 846-4101 (fax)
COMMENTS
Spencer Terminal
Swift Street Extension
9/9/04
1. Curb cuts at drives shall have depressed concrete curbs.
2. The easterly drive should have the same return radii as the westerly
especially when the street is extended into Williston and there will be
turns in that direction.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
18 NOVEMBER 2003
has the authority to limit accesses. There is also a driveway shown for Lot #3 very close to the
one being proposed for lot #1. He suggested a shared access for lot #3. Members agreed and
stipulation "n" was added as follows: Plans shall be revised to show a shared access drive with
Lot #3.
Mr. Kupferman noted that the Fire Chief has in the past been concerned about access to the rear
of buildings. This may create a problem. He also asked about stormwater. Mr. Llewellyn
showed the location of underground storage and holding pond.
Mr. Steinzor cited the danger of approaching this area incrementally, especially where the area is
in flux. He stressed that the existing traffic problems won't be solved by dumping more traffic
onto the streets. He suggested putting off a decision until there is a better context to work in.
Mr. Boucher noted there will be big issues to solve at Final Plat.
Mr. Boucher moved approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-03-56 subject to the stipulations
in the draft motion as amended above. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Messrs.
Bolton and Kupferman abstaining.
6. Continued Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-03-02 of JAM Golf, LLC to
amend a planned unit development consisting of 264 residential units and an 18-hole golf
course. The amendment consists of approval for "as built" berms located on the east side of
Dorset St. beginning at the Old Cross Road intersection extending north through the
Holbrook Road intersection:
Mr. Farley moved to continue this application until 6 January 2004. Mr. Boucher seconded.
Motion passed unanimously.
7. Sketch Plan Application #SD-03-71 of Land Air Express for a planned unit development
consisting of a 24,540 sq. ft. distribution and related storage building with more than 15%
of the GFA in office use for the same tenant, 596 Meadowland Drive:
Mr. Boucher stepped down due to a conflict of interest as an adjacent property owner.
Mr. Willard noted the property is in Meadowlands Park and will be a corporate headquarters.
6840 sq. ft. will be office and the rest will be distribution and service.
Mr. Willard said they will address concerns in staff notes. Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to
meet with the Rec Path Committee.
Mr. Willard showed 8 acres of wetlands that will remain untouched.
Mr. Dinklage asked about the hours of operation. Mr. Willard said the facility would operate 24
M
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
18 NOVEMBER 2003
hours a day. Mr. Belair noted there are performance standards that limit noise that can be heard
from a property. Mr. Willard said they will screen the property with trees. He also noted that the
site is in a very low area.
No other issues were raised.
As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 11:00
p.m.
Clerl
UC-06-0
Date
-7-
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
21 SEPTEMBER 2004
10. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-61 and Final Plat
Application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings for a planned unit
development consisting of: 1) construction of a 26,000 sq. ft. distribution and
related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the
same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no -
construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the
south located at the end of Dubois Drive:
Mr. Boucher stepped down due to a conflict of interest.
Mr. Belair noted the applicant would be expanding the PUD to allow for the moving of
the "don't build" zone.
Mr. Jewkes said they would use municipal water and sewer. They will have a new
stormwater system which meets the new standards.
Mr. Plummeau said this is the first neighbors have heard of this. He asked about hours of
operation, noise, turning movements, etc. He said the building design suggests a pretty
active facility and they are concerned with noise and lighting.
Mr. Jewkes said there is landscaping to buffer noise. There is over 200 ft. to the nearest
home.
Mr. Plummeau said I-189 is further away and noise is very clear. Landscaping won't
work as a buffer to noise.
Mr. Bolton said he wouldn't want trucks left idling out there with diesel emissions. The
applicant said their trucks are timed for 5-minute shutdowns. They have no refrigeration
units. They also do have plug -ins. Mr Bolton recommended a stipulation to insure there
are adequate plug-in facilities.
The applicant, LTL Distribution, said their trucks are loaded in the evening and go out in
the morning. They deal in general commodities, not hazardous materials. They are like
UPS or FedX, but the shipment sizes are a bit larger. Local deliveries are done in smaller
trucks. Mr. Jewkes said they estimate 32 peak hour trip ends. Mr Belair said this is
within traffic limits.
Mr. Dinklage noted that staff recommends the application be continued in order to have
the applicant address noise buffering.
Mr. Jewkes noted that Munson is asking for more landscaping as a buffer (Austrian pines
every 20 feet). They have no objection to doing that.
Mr. Dinklage reminded the applicant that they must meet the city's noise standards.
M
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
21 SEPTEMBER 2004
Mr. Belair said they applicant must provide a plan showing what the whole PUD will
look like.
Mr. Neaghly said he had met with the Rec Path Committee and they will take the path out
of the wetland and bring it around.
Mr. Kupferman then moved to continue preliminary plat application #SD-04-61 and Final
Plat Application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings until 19 October. Mr. Bolton
seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at
10:00 P.M.
Clerk
Date
-7-
I
October 8, 2004
RE: Proposed Spencer Holdings, Inc. (Land Air Express) Terminal Facility,
Lot #3, Meadowland Business Park
Dear City of South Burlington Development Review Board Members:
We are each residents of either the Ledge Knoll neighborhood or the Oak Creek
neighborhood in South Burlington. We have several concerns regarding Spencer
Holdings, Inc.'s (Land Air Express) proposed building on Lot #3 in the Meadowland
Business Park off Hinesburg Road. Some of us attended the September 21, 2004
Development Review Board meeting and we thank you for welcoming us in the
discussion held that night regarding the proposed building. Others of us would have
liked to attend the meeting, but not all residents of our neighborhoods were directly
notified of the meeting. For those of us in attendance, some of our questions regarding
the proposed development were answered during the meeting and in a post meeting
conversation that we had with Bill Spencer. Some of us have even visited and toured
Land Air Express's current facility. Those residents in attendance at the meeting have
shared information gathered regarding the nature of the proposed building with other
neighbors, who also voiced their concern.
Collectively, we are concerned with the nature of the business being proposed and the
ramifications of such a development so close in proximity to our homes. The Spencer
Holdings, Inc. proposal is inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan (2001) for the
Southeast Quadrant (SEQ). The stated goal for the SEQ is "to promote a pattern of land
use and development that respects and maintains the open and special character of the
[SEQ]." The Plan allows for industrial development in the northeast corner of the SEQ
that consists of "high quality, large -lot, environmentally consistent industries or offices
within well -designed planned developments that preserve large tracts of usable, visible,
open space." The plan recognizes that industrial and office use in the SEQ must
"maintain the scenic views and open space and have little adverse traffic impact" to be
"consistent and compatible with the development in the rest of the SEQ." Moreover, the
plan recommends that commercial/industrial uses in the SEQ be limited to "clean, high
quality light manufacturing, research and testing, and office use" (pp. 47-54). In light of
these statements, the proposed facility is clearly incompatible with the City's
Comprehensive Plan because it falls outside the scope of recommended
commercial/industrial uses for the SEQ and, as discussed below, is likely to
adversely impact traffic and tarnish scenic views.
Further, we also note that Land Air Express's business (general parcel carrier) is much
more warehousing and transportation -based in nature than a standard office building. We
believe it will have a very different effect on its residential neighbors than that of the
existing CBA office building in the same Business Park. We, therefore, do not believe
that the proposed Land Air Express distribution facility is an appropriate project for this
site.
In addition, as outlined in more detail below, we oppose the Spencer Holdings, Inc.
building proposal due to the noise, air and environmental pollution, negative health
effects, ambient night light, tarnished view and increased traffic that such a facility would
bring.
NOISE Concern
• Trucks entering Meadowland Business Park and subject lot at early hours in the
morning or late evening hours.
• Use of truck engine brakes ("jake brakes") on downgrade from Hinesburg Road to
facility.
• Truck movement and idling on facility lot.
• Loading and unloading trucks at the site. Noise of forklifts and other equipment
used to move units within facility and onto trucks. Some equipment is mandated
by OSHA to use beepers when operating in reverse. Noise of wooden pallets
being dropped onto trucks.
• Warehouse telephone and loudspeakers.
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION Concern
• Diesel emissions, fumes and odors.
• Siting of/nature of underground or above ground fuel tanks on the property and
precautions against spillage and leakage.
NEGATIVE HEALTH EFFECTS Concern
• Diesel exhaust contains significant levels of small particles, known as fine
particulate matter, that are a serious public health concern.
• According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, diesel particulate matter
is likely to cause cancer in humans and other acute and chronic health effects.
• Diesel engine exhaust exacerbates existing allergies and asthma symptoms.
• Children are most at risk because they breathe 50 percent more air per pound of
body weight than adults.
COMMUNITY COMPATABILITY Concern
• Proposed facility does not appear to be in compliance with the City's stated
plans and goals for the SEQ, per the 2001 Comprehensive Plan.
• It is widely accepted in the transportation planning community that distribution
and logistics centers like the proposed facility tend to attract additional similar
facilities because of the logistical and cost -efficiencies associated with shared
access to arterials, customers and inexpensive and available land.
• A new Hinesburg Road exit from I-89 is part of the City's comprehensive plan;
however, it is widely accepted that it will be many years before funding and
related resources may be available to construct this exit, resulting in trucks
traveling between I-89 and Meadowland Business Park needing to use arterials
and city streets intended in many cases for non -heavy truck uses.
AIMBIENT NIGHT LIGHT Concern
• Light pollution of the night sky.
2
TARNISHED VIEW Concern
• Building within site of houses.
• Existing forest on west side of lot is dying due to standing water (unknown
whether due to natural causes or man-made impacts).
• Storage of materials, containers, trailers, etc. on -site.
• Impact on view of changed site elevation due to fill being used to raise ground
level for building construction.
• Maintenance of facility and yard.
• Fine particles from diesel engines contribute to haze which restricts our ability to
see long distances.
INCREASED TRAFFIC Concern
• Trucks entering and exiting Meadowland Drive from/to Hinesburg Road.
• Turning movements of trucks to/from Hinesburg Road.
• Increased truck traffic on Hinesburg Road, Kennedy Drive and other city
roadways leading to I-89 access points.
Although we oppose the proposed facility, in the event that the Board should choose to
approve the proposed Spencer Holdings, Inc. building, we would urge you to make the
approval subject to all the conditions noted below to lessen the negative impact we feel
the building will have on both the quality of life of the nearby residents and the value of
the properties in the Ledge Knoll and Oak Creek residential developments.
Considerations/Recommendations for NOISE
• No use of truck engine brakes on access road or on the site.
• Hours of operation restricted to 6 am to 10 pm.
• No idling on the site. Engines turned off immediately upon arrival on site.
• Facility to only accommodate inside loading bays (i.e., bays where the truck is
completely inside the building before loading/unloading begins).
• Regular, random testing that noise level is within city guidelines.
• Large (at least 12 feet high) earthen berms on the west and south sides of the lot.
• Independent professional study of proposed facility's noise impacts on Ledge
Knoll neighborhood, with identification and reporting of noise contours and
compliance with South Burlington noise ordinances.
Considerations/Recommendations for ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
• Requirement for electrical plug-in facilities with adequate capacity to
accommodate highest number of trucks anticipated to be parked on -site.
• No idling on the site.
• Exhaust testing on trucks.
• Demonstration that fuel storage on site for trucks, forklifts or other machinery is
compliant with all state and federal regulations.
3
Considerations/Recommendations for COMMUNITY COMPATABILITY
• Ensure the DRB, Planning Commission and City Council fully understand the
potential future implications of siting this type of facility in the Southeast
Quadrant and whether such development meets the goals of the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
• Independent professional study of impact of increased truck traffic (large and
small trucks) on routes between Meadowland Drive and I-89 access points to
understand impacts of intersections, safety, congestion and noise.
Considerations/Recommendations for AIMBIENT NIGHT LIGHT
• Minimum lighting of the lot.
• Lights turned off from 10 pm to 6 am.
• Compliance with South Burlington exterior lighting rules and the pending
revised edition of the Vermont Outdoor Lighting Manual for Vermont
Municipalities.
Considerations/Recommendations for TARNISHED VIEW
• Large (at least 12 feet high) earthen berms on the west and south sides of the lot.
• Dense planting of evergreen trees on top of the berms.
• Minimum requirements for upkeep of building exterior (both structure and
plantings).
Considerations/Recommendations for INCREASED TRAFFIC
• Independent professional study of Hinesburg Road/Meadowland Drive
intersection regarding turning movements, geometry, signal warrants and
pedestrian/bicyclist use/safety and a requirement that any needed improvements
be implemented prior to Spencer Terminal operations.
• Independent professional study of impact of increased truck traffic (large and
small trucks) on routes between Meadowland Drive and I-89 access points to
understand impacts of intersections, safety, congestion and noise.
In conclusion, we strongly oppose the Spencer Holdings, Inc. building proposal for the
reasons discussed above. Notwithstanding, should the Board approve this building
request, we are confident that you will condition the permit with appropriate
requirements such that all neighbors can continue their same quality of life - with good
views, peaceful dark nights, quiet days, clean air, and safe travels to and from home. In
addition, it is important to us that we protect the value of our real estate investments.
We want to thank the City of South Burlington Development Review Board members for
their careful and thoughtful consideration of the concerns that we have expressed herein.
4
Sincerely,
eter umeau
33 Knoll Circle
C \k P H
Cheryl H chens
36 Knoll Ckek
r
D e Main
3, ,Knoll Circle
laine 'Gra
31 Dubois Drive
Shari Levine
21 Dubois Drive
e nifer Wrch
16 Dubois Drive
Wayne P�O/
ay "___/ / 4
37 Kn Circle c�
Leslie Black-Plumeau
33 Knoll Circle
Paul Houchens
36 Knoll Circle
Heather Main
3,/Knoll Circle
Steve Grant
21 ]Dubois Drive
in Borch
Dubois Drive
Shirley Gray
37 Knoll Circle
5
C
R y Ki g
10 Oak reek
�S Kn;,ii Gf�le
I� �•I C, � e c c
Atu�,tzti,
�,e C4r(le
()r4 '1(6kllu
30 �1kn c) l C,
FIE
Wendy King
10 Oak Creek
,h-ut�
ShYky E. Hwy
`3 v n,-11 c c%e.
S b-j hL..S �r
J
'4 1 Gr• VT Us qo3
30
s,
Lee—
C
I
a dctr 1p`�,jC�
S . /�� ✓ T C? S-SSG' 3 S /� . l/ T lJ S% U�
'�G �- v
S �' • �� as��J
PTTE40 SHF-de,�L
/ 9 0/V C2,F,42 . e ,
f �rnand o Carta a
1 7 Oak C gee lk ,br,
r �'n�ton , v T
dS-403
,f„
Pa m-eA 0 `T0 r� `
�re.e�K
oa
�K r '1
-Iz.►-1 cJT` v >
-7t/A 5 M��4,qz
/,� PA?
,�D y ?u `A161-vA1
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: November 5, 2004
1drb\.suNand_air express\preli mina ry_finaI Application received: August 12 2004
LAND AIR EXPRESS
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD-04-61
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-04-64
Agenda #5 Meeting Date- November 9, 2004
Applicant Owner
Land Air Express of New England, Ltd. Summer Ice Joint Venture
115 Covington Lane 82 Church Street
Shelburne, VT 05482 Burlington, VT 05401
Engineer Property Information
Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. Tax Parcel 1155-00596-C
164 Main Street 10 District and Hinesburg Road -North Scenic
Colchester, VT 05446 View Protection overlay District
20.2 Acres
11 Location Map
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final
Spencer Terminal Holdings, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking preliminary and
final plat approval for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) construction of a 26,000 sq ft
distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the
same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no -construction"
buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south located at the end of Dubois
Drive. The Development Review Board held a public hearing on the proposed project on
September 21, 2004 (minutes enclosed), but it was continued to provide the applicant with
sufficient time to provide additional information.
The proposed use is a conditional use in the 10 District and the Hinesburg Road -North Scenic
View Protection Overlay District. However, in accordance with Section 15.03(A) of the Land
Development Regulations, the application is being reviewed as a PUD, so conditional uses do
not need separate conditional use approval.
Staff would like to make a few comments regarding the letter that the Development Review
Board received from a collaboration of concerned neighbors, dated October 8, 2004. Much of
that letter was geared towards explaining how the proposed use was inconsistent with the goals
and character of the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. While many of those points were valid
for the Southeast Quadrant, the proposed project is located within the Industrial & Open Space
Zoning District. Staff would also like to point out that the City does have performance standards
to control noise, air pollution, and lighting in Appendix A of the Land Development Regulations.
The applicant will have to comply with all applicable performance standards throughout the
project.
Associate Planner Brian Robertson, referred to herein as Staff, has reviewed the plans
submitted on September 18, 2003 and has the following comments.
Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements
Table 1. Dimensional Requirements
10 Zoning District
Required
Proposed
Min. Lot Size
3 acres
20.2 acres
�l Max. Density
n/a
n/a
Max. Building Coverage
25%
2.7%
�l Max. Overall Coverage
40%
19.8%
Min. Front Setback
50 ft.
50 ft.
Min. Side Setback
35 ft.
280 ft.
Min. Rear Setback
50 ft.
200 ft.
Max. Building Height
35 ft.
24 ft.
zoning compliance
n/a no residential units proposed
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\nreliminary final
SUBDIVISION CRITERIA
Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations,
subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions:
Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of
the project
According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing
public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at
acceptable pressure.
The entire Meadowland Business Park has an approved water allocation, which applies to this
proposed project. In addition, the water infrastructure has already been installed, so it is only a
matter of connecting this building to the system.
The Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department is in the process of reviewing the
plans. His comments should be available for the meeting.
According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider
or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system
approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The
subdivision received a 30,345 gallon per day sewer allocation. This allocation is still in effect.
Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to
prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the
subject property and adjacent properties.
The proposed grading plan is outlined on sheet SP-3 of the plans and the erosion control details
are outlined on sheet D-3 of the plans.
1. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03
of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the
standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations.
The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to
prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads.
Access to this property is proposed via two (2) access drives off of Meadowland Drive: a 26' wide
drive on the westerly side of the proposed building and a 24' wide drive on the easterly side of the
proposed building. Both of these access drives are proposed for ingress and egress. The two
proposed access drives are at least 400' apart, which is compliance with Section 15.12(E) of the
Land Development Regulations.
Pursuant to Section 15.12(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the easterly
access drive is aligned with Bowdoin Street, on the opposite side of Meadowland Drive.
The proposed truck parking lots are very large to accommodate the large trucks this site will cater
to. Therefore, circulation on the site should not be an issue.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final
According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 71h Edition, the 18,500 square feet of distribution and
related storage space is estimated to generate 15.17 P.M. peak hour tip ends (Land Use 30). The
7,500 square feet of office space is estimated to generate 11.18 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Thus,
the total project is estimated to generate 26.25 P.M. peak hour trip ends.
The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams,
wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on
the site.
The subject property does not contain any identified wildlife habitat. However, the site does
contain a pond and some wetlands. The wetlands are delineated on the plan dated October 16,
2004. The Natural Resources Committee (NRC) reviewed the proposed project at its meeting on
November 4, 2004. The NRC recommended approval with the following conditions:
1. the applicant shall plant a vegetative delineation along the wetland buffer on the easterly
side of the subject property;
2. the applicant shall mitigate the wetland impacts by adding 700 sq. ft. of constructed wetland
to the existing Class III wetland on the easterly side of the subject property;
3. there shall be no development within any of the wetlands or wetland buffers, except for the
proposed encroachment into the Class III wetland buffer adjacent to the northerly property
boundary;
4. there shall be no mowing or planting within the wetlands or wetland buffers;
5. there shall be no pesticide or herbicide application within the wetland or wetland buffers;
6. the detention pond shall be designed to maximize pollutant removal;
7. the applicant shall set-up annual water quality testing, including a base -line test, to ensure
that pollutants are not accumulating in any of the wetlands;
8. the applicant shall implement a mechanism to contain fuel spills;
9. the applicant shall submit confirmation from the wetland expert as to whether the wetlands
on the easterly side of the property are indeed Class III and whether any wetlands or
wetland buffers on the property to the south extend onto the subject property.
The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in
the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in
which it is located.
According to Section 6.04(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Industrial -Open Space
10 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light
industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and
Buffington International Airport. The 10 District regulations and standards are intended to allow
high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open character of the district,
minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and enhance the visual quality of
approaches to the City while providing suitable locations for employment and business growth.
The location and architectural design of buildings in a manner that preserves these qualities is
strongly encouraged.
Staff feels the proposed project is in compliance with the stated purpose of the 10 District, as
outlined in the Land Development Regulations.
Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities
for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\subUand air express\preliminary final
There are significant portions of open space running along the western and eastern portions of the
property, so staff feels this requirement is met.
The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to
ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided.
The Fire Chief is in the process of reviewing the plans. His comments should be available for the
meeting.
Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and
lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such
services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners.
The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the westerly side of the
proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian
and recreation traffic through the property. This pedestrian easement is being relocated within the
planned unit development.
2. The applicant shall submit legal documents related to the new location of this pedestrian
easement, approved by the City Attorney, prior to recording of the final plat plans.
3. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines,
services, and service modifications shall be underground.
Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is
consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards.
The subdivision plans for the entire Meadowland Business Park show details on utilities, lighting,
and stormwater management. These have been approved by the City Engineer, so they are
acceptable for the proposed project.
A lighting point by point plan for the proposed project is contained on sheet SP-5 of the plans,
which meets the requirements in Appendices A.9 and A.10 of the Land Development Regulations.
In addition, the applicant submitted exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the proposed lighting.
The proposed lighting fixtures are in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development
Regulations.
The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the
affected district(s).
Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington
Comprehensive Plan.
SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS
Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site
plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan
applications:
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sublland air express\preliminary final
The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from
structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement and
adequate parking areas.
The applicant's building elevation plans are on sheet A-1 of the plans. Staff feels the proposed
building accomplishes a desirable transition from structure to site and from structure to structure.
The site includes a 20' wide pedestrian easement that will help facilitate pedestrian movement. In
addition, there is an existing recreation path running along Meadowland Drive. Therefore, staff
does not feel any additional sidewalks are necessary on the property.
According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the 18,500
square feet of building dedicated to warehousing, processing storage, and distribution requires
9.25 parking spaces. The 7,500 square feet of building dedicated to office use will require 26.25
parking spaces. Thus, the proposed project will require a total of 36 parking spaces (rounded up
from 35.5). The plans show a total of 67 parking spaces in the main parking lot, adjacent to
Meadowland Drive. According to Table 13-7 of the Land Development Regulations, a property
with 51 to 75 parking spaces requires three (3) handicapped -accessible parking spaces. The plans
only depict two (2) handicapped -accessible spaces. In addition to the 67 standard parking spaces,
the plans also depict 28 parking spaces for trucks on the rear portion of the property.
4. The plans should be revised to depict a total of three (3) handicapped parking spaces, prior final
plat approval.
The dimensions of the proposed parking areas meet the requirements in Table 13-8 of the Land
Development Regulations.
Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees,
residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is proposed in the parking lot to the west of the
proposed building.
Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable.
The majority of the proposed parking is located in the front of the building.
Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district the height and
scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings.
The scale of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site and existing buildings in the area.
The height of the proposed buildings is 27.5', which is in compliance with the Land development
Regulations.
The proposed project is located in a business park in a area where industrial uses exists, so staff
feels the scale of the proposed building is compatible with existing buildings in the area.
Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior
alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground.
Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines,
services, and service modifications shall be underground.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final
The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural
characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive
transitions between buildings of different architectural styles.
Staff feels this requirement is being met.
Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to
existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed
structures.
Staff feels this requirement is being met
In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following
specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations:
The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting
properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial
of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to
improve general access and circulation in the area.
The proposed project is nestled between the wetlands on the site. In order to provide any access
to adjacent properties, wetland encroachments would be necessary. Because the project is in a
large lot, industrial area, staff does not feel access to adjacent properties is necessary. However, if
the property to the south is going to be developed with residential units, as second means of
access, most likely through this property, will be required. This would require an access easement
connecting the property to the south with Meadowland Drive.
Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be
underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to
have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site.
Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines,
services, and service modifications shall be underground.
All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any
recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with
opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enciosure(s).
The plans show a solid waste facility on the easterly side of the proposed building, which is
adequately screened.
Landscaping and Screening Requirements
According to Table 13-9 of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed project has a
minimum landscaping requirement of $14,500. The applicant is proposing $23,170 worth of
landscaping, which includes eighteen (18) Austrian Pines on the property to the south. The
landscape plan and landscape budget are in compliance with Section 13.06 of the Land
Development Regulations.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final
Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area
with twenty (20) of more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking
area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. At least one (1) major deciduous
shade tree, whose caliper is equal to or greater than two and one-half (2.5) inches when
measures six (6) inches above ground at the time of planting, shall be provided within each
parking area for every three thousand (3,000) square feet of paved area or every ten (10)
parking spaces, whichever is greater.
The landscaping plan for the off- street parking area is in compliance with Section 13.06(B) of
the Land Development Regulations.
Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be
specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off.
The plans depict a snow storage area along the southern boundary of the property.
Pursuant to Section 13.06(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any utility
cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review
Board.
The applicant is proposing a screened HVAC pad to the east of the proposed building.
View Protection Zone
5. The applicant shall submit information on the height of the proposed building in relation to
mean sea level, prior to final plat approval.
Other
The City Engineer reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated
September 9, 2004 (attached).
6. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Engineer, as outlined in his
memorandum dated September 9, 2004.
7. Sheet SP-1 of the plans shall be revised to correct the owner and co -applicant address
information for Summer Ice Joint Venture, prior to recording of the final plat plans. These
addresses are labeled as Summit Street in South Burlington, which doesn't exist.
8. Sheet SP-1 of the plans shall be revised so that the parking calculation information
corresponds with the Land Development Regulations, prior to recording of the final plat plans.
9. The plat plan for the entire Meadowland Business Park PUD, and the plat plan for the Dubois
property to the south, shall be submitted prior to recording of the final plat plans.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\subVand air express\preliminary final
Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Preliminary Plat application #SD-
04-61 and Final Plat application #SD-04-64, conditional upon the applicant addressing the
numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document.
Respectfull bmitted,
i
an Roberts p, Associate Planner
Ll-
Copy to: Bill Spencer, applicant
C
I I T awk, Lot r,.S &
JaiLot 7,e w,rnro °°W597 <481 — —
tst 10 Y6L 387 A4JV
s 84SO _wMWdaffik
— 1
\ --T--- aeretnaae swma.°tL,gra,
Pored � V
11 i. Lot 3 A $
Summr Ice JbInt YNW& }(
seal Vol. JB7 P. 439 osert Acrrul ite
Areo=202 acres W 21i P. 168
Location Mao
a—
1 0— /1 eetlmd Duner /nl6rmatkrt:
/ Lot 2 A PeaYe- Ea�"•"-s'r� '� I t Summer /ce ..bbrt Yentuie
/ _ •\ 153 Summit Street
Nrism EodS IbN1y _ - I ''� South Bvr!/ngton, VT 05404
Ifrt B3Y P.1S7 /� / i� \ ,• _ ° 1 (802)-658-6320
,i r :.as a/ angFrm zo' 1 Legend App//crlt /nfarmot/an: Co-App//cnnt /nformat/on:
t>aeesunn E r — - i- — Spencer Terminal Holdings, 11. O, Homer h Morie Dubois
I ties a— n .enure 9er04ct � v �' c% *Y/iom Spencer 1405 Hnesburg Rood
e� P gowty Lbe a R/ght of Mty P.O. Box 50.1 Avenue C South SwH glon, VT 05403
MV/Jston, VT 05495 (802)-862-8687
(802)-863-5062 no me. Jae ,roh,t Y-t1n,
Summit Street
_ f south Burlington, VT 05404
J' 7, t5 lest 0 Waiver themwoc
t 3 a / / I ZMp10.• 1B02I-65B-b'320
N aT23�6 E / Appticon ylg buffer / Lo3 - Meodowtdrd, lndusbid and 4— .�ooce ZmTng District
1 ked 200' eon Y _ Dubois Property Southeast 0v dront Zonb g DaMkt
M 1 Pip s d 200 fe9u 0 Dubois XoPert • - - --�
Zoning earl _ - ---
ase+nen� Amos•
---°d- - -___ _ --
_ _ Lot 3 - Meodor/ond = 202 acres
JV'--d I'iso'..wr eawnrrt i I . _ _ ------ Dubois property = 533 ocros
Soett M m» g.. er I 1 , Total area = M5 ocros
F%A IS
'A 8------------
RECEIVED
Va. Of P282 Porch A a Hann dt Made Dubo/s
Horner & Marl* ptbo/a yyla Vol. 179 P. 126 Acrar, km
KaC 179 A128 1f � Areo=J28 acres
NX 17J P.166
Areo=20.5 acres `Ig O C T 19 2004
Dom A Lop
City of So. Burlington
N
I Va aces A40
� u I
Wbrwy & Dim. I pblMgM to A Abe - 1 Notes.•
tii1ztarto �Porze/ A beabo the i .ate arm w ev nr e: s cm,T: o s✓
4(a! 278 P.193 1� C/ty of Savth Btu/hglm 1 endrbd 7NwbHbW md B✓airess Pant- SL+DWH im Her• by T dM/ ConwRbrq
G9Yee.sx Honct 96022-40 dared 4/23/SW rerawd 8/27/96 ,ecrvded h
j� W •386 P.98 of — aty of Savor &Mhgt_ Lord Rearde,and o P-
1G % PokrrvaeC C t q &g td V � Hid pyy S ..A g r,.977 k sro/1cr 83014, dohs 1t 6
Hbwh�I yt�y 5/B/B5, mcaNM oa Si'Je tll h pfY o/ Soum dxtvgton Land Remda.
I W sea P,262 I 5 �71, gal
I
J / pv� H85 MM
Yo1. L 454 P.P.QS
1
/
y�E / 0• 50' 100' 100 ,XA�• I00' SW'
,krrn d• 5beat R.O t t Lltob s.
Hood
3
I Ya! 12J P4J0 Va. 2P11 .42
Raph :�- Bar Scale t- =100'
.M»atte oWo
wfy'1
212 Pis ' sew
S 7J707f7' E —
� Dore re4xe aeerrror;w cnerxad acre
.� Design
tA3 PUD Plc t
/ Lodi 0W N MO' E `�,'%\011111481111 Drawn FMP
R�SIdQO �! 07A5Y7' � �'+� aJ'\F, � Yf "qa4
I I I f70 —� — I ter a Aa�s ae y1P uw ry � Checked Lot 3 — Meadowland Business Park
I I / L-exec' S g� w fta0.u's� — Va: 213 P.168 = c Scde 1• , 100' and
I I I I soap _ -E �= Dote ate- tQ 20NLands of Homer and Marie Dubois
I / SO7LK17'E woe J erred I I �?StO SJp Project 03225 Meadowl—d Drive South Burlington, V, moot I I uy 194 P21{2 I o tin 1niN � ARLBS' & L4AN1W Consulting Engineers, Ina '
/64 Alain Street, Colchester, Vermont OS-"6
I
to ! Lot 4
V. I Chase ProPies & —
DeveWment, L7D. _
Lot 7 — —
Summer ice ,/olnt l/mtturo
— -�---� I 80' ROW �
- --'—
�.� II Rim=2oS 99' ex. B•P'R' ' -___-'
b• CB a M' oar=195.Js' -1 ' - .-- ----
Rew aee ,t-dh9
-- R �?01.5'
SYR Meodow/ond yn M.. d r=James z
RM,--1oao �-- ex B' Plc rew
-
B'Mv M 19217 ' l ♦ -_ y
�+\ - `\\
� _--- gQ---\ -p2-
_ 50'bu
.-\' �j _ _ '� _. kill ' �%. ^
Q(�11 203
j �•\, IIII ^ 1 _ \\\ 1
_
-- so
/
�\\� \ \2,11 wenone
1 9 "� � Dili __ i_-� ----- ="r`-- Jf \� � \ \\\ V ee✓ eoenn
I Am A.V&- a l / `\.\ IIIL- pasa /// urHoM
Rer oB i'111 - l i 1 1 Il l l _
r./OBB
H / R IASt2o1,n•s2' jY 1 - �\ I' M` 1 ' 1 IIII5 ' butler`,
�� 1rot/md MpMIlllli r \ 11 /: cgs v.rl n
204
�-
i
011
t PCYRl wlknA�''` f' / I11 �A' I�I / � '%� 1 IIII
eew.or/ow ti` 11 III
j \ Pai Mr ovr-tax --Pond Proposed Buil ng i i i i 7
OOO at P,
If
i 7
I l
I _ _ _ FF aozo'
2os-- _ [fill f
l I y; 1 Ik \\ \\\ 2atxl -- °vi l I I I I 1 X `•\klj i i 193i5
Or),
storm t\ lIi1il il i1I
L2 I My r-/97 f; \ \ t \1 /VA �•/.t%1,/Q'�2MY r"WW /111I <�P'
,
1\ \ 1 \ 1 I 1 .I J
-W96.5•
od1 'III I
M19E. Ts'1
M t \\� �\\ III 1 1 1201.? } w I ' 11 I I I
Appigl: b'arr o/� `\ bacruro `\
9 d'aMapr I '_._.._.. R� -1990' \ 1 ' I I 1 I t' "1 ( 75 ; 1 9l i f i l \ \
oxhtM �'�
O O Qlow d' 111106i" ! I I I I
FF-207
0` iiiiii \ 1
Y,p t A A 1 1 1 I I
SabJkf�\2oca 1 N..ca/e i fill ' Lot 3
\O 7 A'"h s Su mer Ice ✓oint Venture
a fill Arec=20. 2 acres
iiiiii
fille end
275 LYos.9 /N •vt/bnd Lga,o. ,�m,,,.,..r sx.•e
I Will . ro.P#mme
m.t _ I° • c�,o.r• no•,,,,�,•, „r
202.25�n
/ / \ J• \ i ; ' �! i \ srzctun Mv. -I-Y G5: I I I I II
oub19135)
. /\ \ 1. / / / 1 ,., \\ \ \\M My avh+J97,o• III 1 3x Mmwr
' •1\ 1 r'•� 1 IR. II I/111'\\1\kl\I\ A � J 5 ' I11111 �l 1 � mmnna,.
yeF":.zozls
20
R'na111 / I I/
y !/ O' 20' 40' 20' 200"
1 Haut-19Adam' by ovy �o,
II I' I I •e• l a l m' I Nsr ig• s J I I 1 I I I I 201M -bbnd
Lot 2 I I I' I �'' ' I I' Ltr •4'p0� I11111 d✓MepfMn
N 1 1 1 1 1' I 1' 1 1 1 I I I 11 I 111 ' (Mhee/ J
Bar Sco% 1= AD'
Munson Earth I Notes•
Moving ,. mM h nor a bowna.y r A'aoe-ry /Me, mown oro ,ra.n o man e,r/nee � i 1 i 1 1 ae6a� y,� j 1 1 i j _ - --- 1111
7Je000N da PM*" by CM F'o 4v Asm tes
2 Ad t Mg pgoe,-ty Mes we /rwm Cty of SouM 6u4grm lox MW, !m 1 1 , \ k , k 1 1 1 I , 1 , 1 I I_ _ _ 1' q� 35r E —_
-----------i----\:\: /11 1 —
10/18/04 WVJt new 0—/N wet/and dNhooN mwked by Brod pf
Ifhee/er cn east s/de of papnso/
I 1 — rjB'-setback D—iptim [heckee
,\ ,1p5 �•r; Design /A✓ Grading Plan
Drawn FMP
I
lv e37523: E ... —� li �, NIP I cneokea
_ _ Corporate Headquart
288.03
P, pored zo• H. et ✓. Dubois
— — '�— ' I I �E ''Mt scale 1" = ao'
k ,, Date -NT7,Tooa Land Air
1 zoo z m9 a m { Project 03225 Af—dowland Dm , South 8,, ngt
t{l
I I I I KRPWS & LdAISZ" Consulting F'ngineers, Inc.
IBA Alain Street, Colchester, Vermont 05"N _______
lo/18/Ot
MEMORANDUM
TO: Project File
FROM: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer
DATE: November 10, 2004
RE: Spencer Terminal Holdings
The following is a list of issues raised at the 11/9/04 public hearing to be
discussed during deliberations:
1. No "Jake Brake" use on downhill section of Meadowland Drive.
2. No idling of trucks longer than 5 minutes.
3. No back-up beeper use between moo p.m. and 7:oo a. m.
4. Add berms on Dubois property with trees on top.
5. No refrigerated trucks.
6. Require a Development Review Board review of any new tenants.
7. Align the easterly access drive opposite Bowdoin Street and add curbs
along east side of access drive.
8. Limit hours of operation.
9. Limit nighttime traffic.
io. Require plan to reduce light intensity at night by use of dimmers, timers,
and motion sensors.
DECISION & CONDITIONS
Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Planning
Commission approves the revised final plat application of Summer
Ice Joint Venture to amend a previously approved subdivision of
116.7 acres of land into ten (10) lots ranging in size from 3.06
acres to 40.94 acres, Hinesburg Road. The amendment consists of
resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into twelve (12) lots ranging
in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres, as depicted on a 25 page set of
plans, page 1 entitled, "Meadowland Business Park, South
Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers,
Inc, dated 6/4/96 with the following stipulations:
1. Any previous approval and stipulations affecting the subject
property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in
effect.
2. Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall post a
$47,400 landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value of
proposed street trees and berm landscaping. The bond shall remain
in effect for three (3) years from date of planting to assure that
the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of
surviving. The berm installation and planting shall take place
contemporaneously with the road construction.
3. In order for the Commission to find that the proposed
development will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or
unsafe conditions with respect to use of the highways, the
applicant shall be responsible for the following:
a) The project is approved for a maximum of 830 A.M. peak
hour trip ends and 673 P.M. peak hour trip ends, Any
subsequent development of a lot or lots which exceeds this
limit shall require an updated traffic impact analysis.
b) Applicant shall install, prior to occupancy of first
building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the
Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on sheet
SP15). VAOT shall approve the design prior to issuance of a
zoning permit.
c) Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal
warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown
to be warranted at Rte 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant
shall install signal at specifications approved by the City.
d) Each building lot shall be required to pay the
appropriate road impact fee as defined in the South
Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance.
4. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit or start of roadway or
utility construction, all appropriate legal documents including
4
easements (e.g., utility, sewer, drainage, water, -recreation path,
etc) and roadway r.o.w.'s (irrevocable offer of dedication) shall
be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the
South Burlington land records.
5. The applicant. shall contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Road
sidewalk fund based on 1,260 feet of frontage along Hinesburg Road.
The contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a zoning permit
for any lot.
6. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit or start of roadway or
utility construction, bonds to cover the costs of roadway, utility,
and sidewalk construction shall be posted. The amount of the bond
shall be approved by the City Engineer.
7. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new
street until such time as the street and r.o.w. is accepted and
taken over by the City.
8. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 30,345 gpd. The
applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to
issuance of a zoning permit. The length of time that this sewer
allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway
construction. The roadways serving this development shall be
completed by 6/28/04. The sewer allocation for any lots served by
a roadway or portion of roadway which is not completed by 6/28/04
shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission.
9. The developer shall furnish to the City, at least 7 days prior
to beginning of road construction, the name of the contractors
doing the street and utility work and the architect and/or engineer
who will stake out and supervise the work.
10. In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision
regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements
(e.g., streets, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc)
the developer shall submit to the City Engineers "as -built"
construction drawings certified by a registered engineer.
11. The plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below
and shall require approval of the City Planner . Three (3) copies
of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the City
Planner prior to recording.
a) Sheet P2 shall be revised to increase the size of the
proposed street trees to a minimum of 2.5 inches.
b) The note on sheet P7 referring to Thompson Street being
a private road serving lot 12 shall be changed to refer to
lot 11.
9
c) Sheets SP3 and P7 shall be revised to show a fire hydrant
in a location approved by the Fire Chief.
12., Wetlands shall be delineated on lot 3 prior to development.
13. Deeds for lots 7, 8 and 9 shall reflect the fact that the
western portions of these lots will be unusable because of the
Potash Brook CO zone.
14. As provided in Section 605 of the Subdivision Regulations, if
substantial construction of the project has not started within
three (3) years (i.e., by 7/30/99), this approval shall be null and
void.
15. The Planning Commission waives the requirement for a sidewalk
on the south side of the main roadway (i.e., 80' r.o.w.) due to the
provision of a number of pedestrian/recreation path easements over
the property.
16. The existing drainage ditch along the south side of lots 1 and
2 shall be filled in contemporaneously with construction of the new
drainageway as shown on sheets SP10 and SP11,.
17. Access (i.e., driveways) to lots 4-11 shall be from the side
streets, not from Swift Street Extension.
18. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the land records
within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall
be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to
recording.
pas
Chairman or Clerk
South Burlington Planning Commission
to
F
Re: For Ian Jewkes - Land Air Wetland Issuef
Subject: Re: For Ian Jewkes - Land Air Wetland Issues
From: Brad Wheeler <bwheeler@sover.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:45:28 -0500
To: Krebs & Lansing <klengineers@adelphia.net>
Ian,
Today I conducted a site visit at the Land Air Corporate Headquarters project site in South Burlington
to determine:
1. If the wetlands along the east side of the project site are Class Two or Class Three wetlands, and
2. if there are wetlands in the 200 foot buffer zone south of the southern property line for the Land Air
project site.
My findings are as follows:
1. There is a wetland mapped on the Vermont Significant Habitat map for this area located
approximately 1,000 feet southeast of the project site. Based on today's site visit, it appears that the
wetlands along the east side of the project area may be contiguous to the mapped wetlands. This
would result in the site wetlands being classified as Class Two wetlands. This determination should be
confirmed by the Vermont Wetlands Office. This project would be subject to the Vermont Wetland
Rules if any of the planned construction activities are located in or within 50 feet of a Class Two
wetland. Based on our review of the site plan, there are no activities proposed within 50 feet of any
Class Two wetlands on this site.
The small wetland that is within less than 10 feet of the proposed driveway is a Class Three wetland.
Proposed construction activities that are located within 50 feet of a Class Three wetland do not require
review under the Vermont Wetland Rules or under the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
2. I examined the 200-foot buffer zone south of the Land Air project site. There are wetlands along
the northwest edge of this area, but no other wetlands were found in this buffer zone. The actual area
of review extended approximately 250 feet south of the Land Air parcel.
Please feel free to call if you have any questions. I will be in the field on Tuesday - Friday. I can be
reached by cell phone at 793-8367.
Thank you, Brad Wheeler
Bradley A. Wheeler, Principal Scientist
Wheeler Environmental Services, LLC
301 North Main Street, Suite 2
Barre, Vermont 05641
Phone (802) 479-4500/Cell (802) 793-8367
Fax (802) 479-4600
1 of 1 11/9/2004 5:40 AM
SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT
403 Queen City Park Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
Phone: (802) 864-4361
Fax: (802) 864-0435
September 20, 2004
Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc.
164 Main Street
Colchester, VT 05446
Re: Corporate Headquarters- Land Air
South Burlington
Dear Sir:
The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced
project. Please find my comments below.
1. Details of water infrastructure should be corrected to reflect those found in the
Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances
for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District, the City of South
Burlington, Colchester Fire District 91, and the Village of Jericho. Specifically,
the fire hydrant installation detail should be corrected. All water installation work
and water distribution material must comply with these specifications.
2. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public
water system shall be protected with a backflow prevention assembly, and an
appropriate thermal expansion system in compliance with the Ordinance For The
Control Of Cross Connections Within The Water System Of the City Of South
Burlington. Please contact this department for more information on backflow
protection devices.
3. Eight -inch Ductile Iron (DI) water pipe shall have no less than three (3) brass
wedges installed at each joint. Bury depth to the new main shall be six feet (6') to
the top of the pipe. The new 8" DI main shall be Poly wrapped.
4. No underground utility lines or structures shall be installed within four feet from
the water main on either side, from the top of the main to the finish grade, with
the exception of storm sewer and sanitary sewer lines as stated in the above
referenced Specifications. Trees shall not be placed over any watermain or
service line, nor placed within 20' of any appurtenance, including fire hydrants.
Generally, other underground utilities shall be placed on the opposite side of the
road from proposed or existing water mains.
5. Separation between the water main and service line and nearby sanitary and storm
sewer lines shall comply with the VT WSR requirements and the above
referenced Specifications.
6. Prior to any building construction, the building contractor must contact this
Department to discuss City requirements for meter sizing, meter settings, and
backflow protection.
7. The SBWD shall be sent any future hard copy plans involving this project for
review, independent from those plans sent to the Planning and Zoning
Department. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in
the above referenced Specifications. Prior to final plat recording the SBWD shall.
be provided a copy of the final plans.
8. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all fittings, thrust
blocks, main line taps, appurtenances, water line crossings, and testing.
9. Further review changes may be required as this project proceeds through the
permit process. The SBWD shall be provided a final plat for this project prior to
recording for final review and approval.
10. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG
Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion
of the water system improvements.
If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me.
Sincerely,
AJayYdeau
Superintendent
CC. Brian Robertson
Doug Brent
George Dow
Plan Reviews: Land Air Corporate offices
� y
IPe�nenL LR1 - � -
Lot 7 t yantta• , yq _ -
.ARnmse /ee
S
tT459 -V
K _
---�\� _ _Q--�- e>e-•.n w m�_.- m_reTervn_aa Ii
_-c__ .-`S •�l�---- ->L "ate-.. .z�io /'�•-^•-fix.r
oaw
I
LYeai N/E
-_- ----- ----- AveS Inc.
_-_ __
s
"o
[eae a waow
1 .________-_-__
= r
. ---- • South 9xthgfon
Lot 2 I hwr..aaae„ wJ l / \ _ Wit•♦, --- - _ er r 3 ,n --- - — -- - -
N/F �nrowM Qaf ♦ a,. Qa
A/ caul Earth 1 _ ` •,.,,, �' q I a �" l!
$ I
i r 1
1 _ V7F
y
p �N Location MOD q l
�.soo of _ " tL
Owner /ntbtmatkn:
I I
� Summer /ce Joint Ventura
i 153 Summit tt,
South Bw/mglon, VT 05404 N/F
(802)-658-6120 1 L7eenAcrox Inc.
_.._.
App//cant /nfarmot/an: Co-App/kimtt /nfortnotlan: 1
I �� + ❑
t�rl.^l it `♦ ; O c/enter - _57al Ho/dingS L.L.C. 1405 i A/arg Obho/s
`:j �� I� 1 I c% 8aiir 5 .�/eticer saut N U Mgt/ Rood I
•4� � P.O. Box SOJ Avenue C Soutn tiurlingto2 VT 05403
1 / �`�""-•�.. ;♦♦ I I{W//ston, VT 05495 (802)-86?-B687
(802)-863-5062 1
I ner. •..ar .r -_ .,_ ``1 / Lot 3 Summer /ce ,bmt Venture
�•w e++e� I - a Summit Street
Ln \ amps..~ ` �//7NnM /LY ✓o%nt t/enture 153 South B.Hi gton, Vr 05404
Areo=20.? acres (802)-658-6320
/ndrst io/ and Open Spore Zoning Oist-t I
Y %' Total area = 20.2 acres 1
R'Oposed Lot Com-ove - Lot S1.•
I /, / �'/ ��__�__\ ��`♦ ' , }' a -a .#W New S Rowrgs 26.000 s.t eAaerw 2.9l I
New Parking A• Roads =,i = 14.7X
o' ❑ Total C mvroge O
= TOCtl°n 1z.x a e< = 176T
Front Yard Co -age = 37Z 1
,
Ptmtdno- I
-
/ p/oywes � 1 space/amp/ogee = 50 spaces P
❑ 26, 000 sq. R. ' 0.5 ,,votes/1, 000 s7, it = 13 spaces
Proposed Parking nSpoces 6=3 I Propo67 ( Ind./ 2 had/toOPed)
/
Lot 2 1 'U�\ 1
�,, �, N/F I I � ' mow' \ ez nere ❑.ter - _. .��/ ��
' AhYlean
w „ng II jAeneM tbrd A'I� x oo. r e -----_ h.a`v Drrd oP sP" Oiefrrtf
mnr-9
_ —
N
i
8
? 49
----- I _ 4 55
\\
__-`� G•
- 288.03 I / Notes
/. ma b nor o boun"hr X A erhpr.9 /he= into.,, =e ern a P� evurae V /�'
B,ab- 'Neodo,t ds Pa* • by CAWrnghesAsaacpfes.
Abutthg P,epedy /hee are Abn CRY of S ffi 8u T Ngos (h
v
eegren
1
he t NL &,&06 - - - - _ — - - —---------- Ci� S+O
— — — ----
Legen
20
- - ------ �9�0
----- _---------------------- h
• Rrw pp, /«me i I _ _ _ - Dote -W-d Deeo oti- oedw Dare -
'1 _- Design Site P/an
O Canoere mawmmt to be /LA.1
Concrete mwwment to be set
at aMectim of Omer 1 Drawn
FMP
A piape,,,e1p,e 11 Checked Corporate Headquarters
� _ -------------I ------- D. zs' bo' 100' 150' YGk)• �. ,_ _ 50'
Scale -
--� YLh, rRight o/woY 1 - Jx Y7, 11Me
L and Air
--.S11 Fxisth9 groane cmtour �________ ________ I Date r
® 5e1_ monhde I ar Scale 150'
Project 03225 Swift Street Extension-Hinesbu Rd South B/nu ton, Vermont
" =
Ix hy&-t A"' WS & LANSINC Consulting L'ngineers, Inc. SP
16I A(ain Street, Cote%esterr Vermont 06446
TO: Project File
FROM: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer
DATE: November 10, 2004
RE: Spencer Terminal Holdings
The following is a list of issues raised at the 11/9/04 public hearing to be
discussed during deliberations:
1. No "Jake Brake" use on downhill section of Meadowland Drive.
2. No idling of trucks longer than 5 minutes.
3. No back-up beeper use between moo p.m. and 7:0o a. m.
4. Add berms on Dubois property with trees on top.
5. No refrigerated trucks.
6. Require a Development Review Board review of any new tenants.
7. Align the easterly access drive opposite Bowdoin Street and add curbs
along east side of access drive.
8. Limit hours of operation.
9. Limit nighttime traffic.
io. Require plan to reduce light intensity at night by use of dimmers, timers,
and motion sensors.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
November 10, 2004
Ian Jewkes
Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers
164 Main Street
Colchester, VT 05446
Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings
Dear Mr. Jewkes:
Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the October 19, 2004
Development Review Board meeting.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
I--- I ��, k--)
Betsy McDonough
Administrative Assistant
Encl.
C
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
19 OCTOBER 2004
Ms. Quimby moved to continue Preliminary Plat SD-04-61 and Final Plat #SD-04-64 to 9
November. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Boucher rejoined the Board.
7. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-04-74 of OB2, LLC, to amend a
previously approved planned unit development consisting of: 1) a 3000 sq. ft.
restaurant, 2) a 12,500 sq. ft. nightclub, 3) a 1620 sq. ft. personal service use,
4) a 1500 sq. ft. general office, 5) a 2408 sq. ft. short-order restaurant, and 6)
a 1880 sq. ft. short order restaurant. The amendment consists of: 1)
constructing an 8'x9' walk-in cooler, 2) constructing an 8'x40' storage
container, and 3) constructing a 3'x3' refrigeration condenser pad, 1216
Williston Road:
Mr. Statesir said they have been under construction and have found some things that need
to be more efficient for them and for the city.
Green Mountain Power will be removing a pole and the structure that holds it up. Wiring
in that location will be underground.
They also need space for some outside storage.
Staff had no issues.
Mr. Boucher moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-04-74 of OB2, LLC, subject
to the stipulations in the draft motion. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed
unanimously.
8. Final Plat Application #SD-04-69 of K.W. Burlington, LLC, to amend a
planned unit development consisting of a 76,630 sq. ft. shopping center, drive
through bank, and 106 room hotel. The amendment consists of: 1)
constructing a 2,511 sq. ft. structure to cover an existing swimming pool, and
2) reducing the number of rooms at the hotel to 105, 1285 Williston Road:
Mr. White said they will add landscaping and a bike rack as requested.
Mr. Belair said the only issue is a request for a $1930 landscape waiver. Mr. White said
there is no more room for landscaping and the site is well landscaped.
Members were OK with this.
Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-04-69 of K.W. Burlington,
LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion
passed unanimously.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
19 OC'TOBER 2004
fire. He is also concerned with maintenance of the private drive in winter. The applicant
said the homeowners association would be responsible for plowing.
The neighbor to the north noted that water and sewer lines will cross the wetland. The
state application says there will be no culvert. He wanted to be sure the applicant
complies with that. Mr. Belair said they have to comply with conditions of the state
permit.
Mr. Veve said the sewer lines are for a force fed system not a gravity system. The pipe is
not anchored at a particular place. They could cross the stream without there having to
be a culvert. Mr. Veve noted there are no plans for a gravity system. He wanted to be
sure the city's approval is based on the state approval. Mr. Veve also noted he had been
approached regarding a gravity system. Mr. Dinklage said any change from what is
proposed in this plan would have to come back to the DRB.
Mr. Veve said he was also concerned with pressure on the hydrants to be adequate to get
to all the houses. Mr. McClellan said they did an analysis of the whole system.
Ms. Quimby then moved to approve Preliminary Plat #SD-04-67 and Final Plat #SD-04-
68 of Mike Anderson subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Bolton
seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application #SD-04-61 and Final
Plat application #SD-04-64 of Spencer 'Terminal Holdings for a planned unit
development consisting of: 1) construction of a 26,000 sq. ft. distribution and
related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the
same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no -
construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the
south located at the end of Dubois Drive:
Mr. Boucher stepped down during this discussion due to a conflict of interest.
Mr. Belair noted that part of a driveway accessing a unit will cross a wetland buffer.
Input is needed from the Natural Resources Committee, so a decision cannot be made at
this meeting.
Mr. Dinklage noted receipt of a letter signed by a number of residents of Oak Creek.
Mr. Plummeau asked that Oak Creek and Ledge Knoll residents be notified of future
meetings on this application. He also asked that the Board take their concerns seriously.
Ms. O'Grady asked if there will be diesel trucks at this facility. Mr. Dinklage said he
thought so. Ms. O'Grady cited reports on how diesel trucks contribute to haze. She felt
this was important for more than just abutters.
-3-
0
y I Lot 7
o Summer ice Joint Venture
Vol 387 P. 439
C/ass
wet/and
Pond V
t
I \
i IDetM7t1o17\
I Pond
Q� \ \ I
"' % w Class // wetland \
% Proposed 20' \
�edestriion Easement
Moving , -
57
1
i
i
50' setb]gc/(
' 2� 03' SOONAt83-25'260 E
"26 MMOM
0080
I
9' V
V
10' sewer easement
1
1 �
1 )Detention)
Pond I
I "A '• i
1 I (Foreboy)
t
o
Lot 4
Chose
Properties &
o
De veiopmen t, LTD.
Vol
597 P. 481 -- _
— --I
mom mono
31
V,S84-59'-36-'--W,
Class /// wet/and
Class /// wet/and
`
Lot 3
a,
="
I Summer Ice Joint Venture
Vol 387 P. 439
� $o
o
' -
Area=20.2 acres
I
/
I
4
) Coss /// wetland
I
\
F3 r I
I
I �
'_I,
/
Terminus of original
20'
i'
Pedestrian Easement
Class /// wetland
zoning 01strict/
_ - -
'-
\
'
a1 and Ono n Spate 51100
tndastn t Zoning District
1042 51
Quadsn/
s
N 8249'35� E
ntheast
� m SOON
i
/ cote the )
L I to ""lot
nest a waiver Lot J to l '
� 1 ,gppliconts request buffer from
1 Proposed 200' required 200' zoning.buffer
erty ,
p the Dubois p P
Zoning Buffer _—
_ pede� n E°semi
Proposes- - - -
Gre
Vo
Krebs & Lansil
f Main Street
Consulting Engineers, Inc. Colchester, VT 05446
phone (802) 878-0375
fax(802)-878-9618
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL:
DATE: October 18, 2004
From: Ian A. Jewkes
To: Ray Belair
City of South Burlington
RE: Spencer Terminal Holdings Application, Meadowland Industrial Park
Dear Ray,
Please find attached a copy of our Plans with a new wetland delineation on the east side of the
proposed project. The wetland delineation was performed by Brad Wheeler last week. All of the
wetlands on this side of the site are Class III. All of the proposed improvements are outside of the
Class III wetland limits.
We have hired a consultant, Jon Wilkinson, to examine the noise generation from this project. Mr.
Wilkinson has taken measurements at the existing Spencer site. He is working on his report today.
We will forward any information to you as soon as we have it. Mr. Wilkinson will also attend the
meeting.
Please call if you have any questions or comments.
0
KREBS & LANSIN
CONSULTING ENGINEE INC.
164 Main Street
COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446
(802) 878-0375
FAX (802) 878-9618 n TO G"' I / L
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
DATE I J
V'
JOB NO. O �� S
ATTENTION
RE:
the following items:
❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
5
� vn
Fr✓ i 51r
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval
❑ For your use
❑ As requested
❑ For review and comment
❑ FORBIDS DUE
REMARKS
❑ Approved as submitted
❑ Approved as noted
❑ Returned for corrections
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
COPY TO
SIGNED:
if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
To: South Burlington Development Review Board
From: Brian Robertson, Associate Planner q-,Ttz�
RE: SD-04-61 and SD-04-64
Date: October 15, 2004
Agenda #6
Spencer Terminal Holdings appeared before the Development Review Board on
September 21, 2004 for preliminary and final plat approval of a planned unit
development consisting of. 1) construction of a 26,000 sq ft distribution and related
storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the same tenant at 596
Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no -construction" buffer from 596
Meadowland Drive to the property to the south located at the end of Dubois Drive
(minutes enclosed). The Development Review Board continued the hearing until October
19, 2004 to give the applicant time to revise the plans and submit additional information.
Staff has not received any revised plans or additional information since that meeting.
Any additional materials that we receive will be available at the meeting.
CITY OF SOUTH BU LINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
October 15, 2004
Ian Jewkes
Krebs & Lansing
164 Main Street, Suite 201
Colchester, VT 05446
Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings
Dear Mr. Jewkes:
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting
and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting
on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room,
575 Dorset Street.
If you have any questions, please give us a call.
Sincerely,
r'
BetstMc nough
Administrative Assistant
Encl.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURUNGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
vIP� TrAv
October 15, 2004
Ian Jewkes
Krebs & Lansing
164 Main Street, Suite 201
Colchester, VT 05446
Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings
Dear Mr. Jewkes:
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting
and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting
on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 at 7.30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room,
575 Dorset Street.
If you have any questions, please give us a call.
Sincerely,
`4
BetstMc nough
Administrative Assistant
Encl.
CITE' OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
October 6, 2004
Ian Jewkes
Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers
164 Main Street
Colchester, VT 05446
Re: Minutes — 596 Meadowland Drive
Dear Mr. Jewkes:
Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the September 21, 2004
Development Review Board meeting.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Betsy Mc onough
Administrative Assistant
Encl.
��a
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BARD
21 SEPTEMBER 2004
010
Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-61 and Final Plat
Application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings for a planned unit
development consisting of: 1) construction of a 26,000 sq. ft. distribution and
related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the
same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no -
construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the
south located at the end of Dubois Drive:
Mr. Boucher stepped down due to a conflict of interest.
Mr. Belair noted the applicant would be expanding the PUD to allow for the moving of
the "don't build" zone.
Mr. Jewkes said they would use municipal water and sewer. They will have a new
stormwater system which meets the new standards.
Mr. Plummeau said this is the first neighbors have heard of this. He asked about hours of
operation, noise, turning movements, etc. He said the building design suggests a pretty
active facility and they are concerned with noise and lighting.
Mr. Jewkes said there is landscaping to buffer noise. There is over 200 ft. to the nearest
home.
Mr. Plummeau said I-189 is further away and noise is very clear. Landscaping won't
work as a buffer to noise.
Mr. Bolton said he wouldn't want trucks left idling out there with diesel emissions. The
applicant said their trucks are timed for 5-minute, shutdowns. They have no refrigeration
units. They also do have plug -ins. Mr Bolton recommended a stipulation to insure there
are adequate plug-in facilities.
The applicant, LTL Distribution, said their trucks are loaded in the evening and go out in
the morning. They deal in general commodities, not hazardous materials. They are like
UPS or FedX, but the shipment sizes are a bit larger. Local deliveries are done in smaller
trucks. Mr. Jewkes said they estimate 32 peak hour trip ends. Mr Belair said this is
within traffic limits.
Mr. Dinklage noted that staff recommends the application be continued in order to have
the applicant address noise buffering.
Mr. Jewkes noted that Munson is asking for more landscaping as a buffer (Austrian pines
every 20 feet). They have no objection to doing that.
Mr. Dinklage reminded the applicant that they must meet the city's noise standards.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
21 SEPTEMBER 2004
Mr. Belair said they applicant must provide a plan showing what the whole PUD will
look like.
Mr. Neaghly said he had met with the Rec Path Committee and they will take the path out
of the wetland and bring it around.
Mr. Kupferman then moved to continue preliminary plat application #SD-04-61 and Final
Plat Application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings until 19 October. Mr. Bolton
seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at
10:00 P.M.
Clerk
Date
-7-
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
Report preparation date: September 16, 2004
\drb\subUand_air express\preliminary_final
Application received: August 12, 2004
LAND AIR EXPRESS
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD-04-61
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-04-64
Agenda #9 Meeting Date: September 21, 2004
Applicant
Owner
Land Air Express of New England, Ltd.
Summer Ice Joint Venture
115 Covington Lane
82 Church Street
Shelburne, VT 05482
Burlington, VT 05401
Engineer
Property Information
Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers,
Inc.
Tax Parcel 1155-00596-C
164 Main Street
10 District and Hinesburg Road -North Scenic
Colchester, VT 05446
View Protection overlay District
20.2 Acres
Location Map
y
�yrm
Al
}T 7Y7Y
r`
:
t�
-------------
CITY OF SOUTH BURLIN& TON 2 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final
Spencer Terminal Holdings, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking preliminary and
final plat approval for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) construction of a 26,000 sq ft
distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the
same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no -construction"
buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south located at the end of Dubois
Drive. The sketch plan for this project was reviewed by the Development Review Board on
November 18, 2003 (minutes enclosed).
The proposed use is a conditional use in the 10 District and the Hinesburg Road -North Scenic
View Protection Overlay District. However, in accordance with Section 15.03(A) of the Land
Development Regulations, the application is being reviewed as a PUD, so conditional uses do
not need separate conditional use approval.
Associate Planner Brian Robertson, referred to herein as Staff, has reviewed the plans
submitted on September 18, 2003 and has the following comments.
Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements
Table 1. Dimensional Requirements
10 Zoning District
Required
Proposed
Min. Lot Size
3 acres
20.2 acres
Max. Density
n/a
n/a
�l Max. Building Coverage
25%
2.7%
Max. Overall Coverage
40%
19.8%
Min. Front Setback
50 ft.
50 ft.
�l Min. Side Setback
35 ft.
280 ft.
Min. Rear Setback
50 ft.
200 ft.
Max. Building Height
35 ft.
24 ft.
zoning compliance
n/a no residential units proposed
SUBDIVISION CRITERIA
Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations,
subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions:
Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of
the project.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLING TON 3 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final
According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing
public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at
acceptable pressure.
The entire Meadowland Business Park has an approved water allocation, which applies to this
proposed project. In addition, the water infrastructure has already been installed, so it is only a
matter of connecting this building to the system.
The Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department is in the process of reviewing the
plans. His comments should be available for the meeting.
According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider
or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system
approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The
subdivision received a 30,345 gallon per day sewer allocation. This allocation is still in effect.
Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to
prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the
subject property and adjacent properties.
The proposed grading plan is outlined on sheet SP-3 of the plans and the erosion control details
are outlined on sheet D-3 of the plans.
1. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03
of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the
standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations.
The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to
prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads.
Access to this property is proposed via two (2) access drives off of Meadowland Drive: a 26' wide
drive on the westerly side of the proposed building and a 24' wide drive on the easterly side of the
proposed building. Both of these access drives are proposed for ingress and egress. The two
proposed access drives are at least 400' apart, which is compliance with Section 15.12(E) of the
Land Development Regulations.
Pursuant to Section 15.12(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the easterly
access drive is aligned with Bowdoin Street, on the opposite side of Meadowland Drive.
The proposed truck parking lots are very large to accommodate the large trucks this site will cater
to. Therefore, circulation on the site should not be an issue.
According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, the 18,500 square feet of distribution and
related storage space is estimated to generate 15.17 P.M. peak hour tip ends (Land Use 30). The
7,500 square feet of office space is estimated to generate 11.18 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Thus,
the total project is estimated to generate 26.25 P.M. peak hour trip ends.
The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams,
wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on
the site.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final
The subject property does not contain any identified wildlife habitat. However, the site does
contain a pond and some wetlands. The wetlands are partially delineated on the plans dated July
27, 2004. The wetlands on the easterly side of the proposed building do not appear to be
delineated on the plans. The proposed building and parking area are outside of the associated 50'
buffer, as shown on the plans. However, this cannot be accurately determined until all wetlands on
the property are delineated by a wetland professional.
2. The plans should be revised to have a wetland professional delineate all of the wetlands on the
property, prior to preliminary plat approval.
The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in
the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in
which it is located.
According to Section 6.04(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Industrial -Open Space
10 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light
industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and
Burlington International Airport. The 10 District regulations and standards are intended to allow
high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open character of the district,
minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and enhance the visual quality of
approaches to the City while providing suitable locations for employment and business growth.
The location and architectural design of buildings in a manner that preserves these qualities is
strongly encouraged.
Staff feels the proposed project is in compliance with the stated purpose of the 10 District, as
outlined in the Land Development Regulations.
Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities
for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas.
There are significant portions of open space running along the western and eastern portions of the
property, so staff feels this requirement is met.
The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to
ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided.
The Fire Chief is in the process of reviewing the plans. His comments should be available for the
meeting.
Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and
lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such
services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners.
The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the westerly side of the
proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian
and recreation traffic through the property. This pedestrian easement is being relocated within the
planned unit development.
3. The applicant shall submit legal documents related to the new location of this pedestrian
easement, approved by the City Attorney, prior to recording of the final plat plans.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final
4. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines,
services, and service modifications shall be underground.
Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is
consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards.
The subdivision plans for the entire Meadowland Business Park show details on utilities, lighting,
and stormwater management. These have been approved by the City Engineer, so they are
acceptable for the proposed project.
A lighting point by point plan for the proposed project is contained on sheet SP-5 of the plans,
which meets the requirements in Appendices A.9 and A.10 of the Land Development Regulations.
In addition, the applicant submitted exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the proposed lighting.
The proposed lighting fixtures are in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development
Regulations.
The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the
affected district(s).
Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington
Comprehensive Plan.
SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS
Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site
plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan
applications:
The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from
structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement and
adequate parking areas.
The applicant's building elevation plans are on sheet A-1 of the plans. Staff feels the proposed
building accomplishes a desirable transition from structure to site and from structure to structure.
The site includes a 20' wide pedestrian easement that will help facilitate pedestrian movement. In
addition, there is an existing recreation path running along Meadowland Drive. Therefore, staff
does not feel any additional sidewalks are necessary on the property.
According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the 18,500
square feet of building dedicated to warehousing, processing storage, and distribution requires
9.25 parking spaces. The 7,500 square feet of building dedicated to office use will require 26.25
parking spaces. Thus, the proposed project will require a total of 36 parking spaces (rounded up
from 35.5). The plans show a total of 67 parking spaces in the main parking lot, adjacent to
Meadowland Drive. According to Table 13-7 of the Land Development Regulations, a property
with 51 to 75 parking spaces requires three (3) handicapped -accessible parking spaces. The plans
only depict two (2) handicapped -accessible spaces. In addition to the 67 standard parking spaces,
the plans also depict 28 parking spaces for trucks on the rear portion of the property.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
Wrb\.subVand air express\preliminary final
5. The plans should be revised to depict a total of three (3) handicapped parking spaces, prior final
plat approval.
The dimensions of the proposed parking areas meet the requirements in Table 13-8 of the Land
Development Regulations.
Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees,
residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is proposed in the parking lot to the west of the
proposed building.
Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable.
The majority of the proposed parking is located in the front of the building.
Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district; the height and
scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings.
The scale of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site and existing buildings in the area.
The height of the proposed buildings is 27.5', which is in compliance with the Land development
Regulations.
The proposed project is located in a business park in a area where industrial uses exists, so staff
feels the scale of the proposed building is compatible with existing buildings in the area.
Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior
alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground.
Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines,
services, and service modifications shall be underground.
The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural
characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive
transitions between buildings of different architectural styles.
Staff feels this requirement is being met.
Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to
existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed
structures.
Staff feels this requirement is being met
In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following
specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations:
The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting
properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial
of collector street; to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to
improve general access and circulation in the area.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final
The proposed project is nestled between the wetlands on the site. In order to provide any access
to adjacent properties, wetland encroachments would be necessary. Because the project is in a
large lot, industrial area, staff does not feel access to adjacent properties is necessary. However, if
the property to the south is going to be developed with residential units, as second means of
access, most likely through this property, will be required. This would require an access easement
connecting the property to the south with Meadowland Drive.
Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be
underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to
have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site.
Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines,
services, and service modifications shall be underground.
All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any
recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with
opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s).
The plans show a solid waste facility on the easterly side of the proposed building, which is
adequately screened.
Landscaping and Screening Requirements
According to Table 13-9 of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed project has a
minimum landscaping requirement of $14,500. The applicant is proposing $23,170 worth of
landscaping, which includes eighteen (18) Austrian Pines on the property to the south. The
landscape plan and landscape budget are in compliance with Section 13.06 of the Land
Development Regulations.
Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area
with twenty (20) of more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking
area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. At least one (1) major deciduous
shade tree, whose caliper is equal to or greater than two and one-half (2.5) inches when
measures six (6) inches above ground at the time of planting, shall be provided within each
parking area for every three thousand (3,000) square feet of paved area or every ten (10)
parking spaces, whichever is greater.
The landscaping plan for the off- street parking area is in compliance with Section 13.06(B) of
the Land Development Regulations.
Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be
specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off.
The plans depict a snow storage area along the southern boundary of the property.
Pursuant to Section 13.06(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any utility
cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review
Board.
The applicant is proposing a screened HVAC pad to the east of the proposed building
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final
View Protection Zone
6. The applicant shall submit information on the height of the proposed building in relation to
mean sea level, prior to final plat approval.
Other
The City Engineer reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated
September 9, 2004 (attached).
7. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Engineer, as outlined in his
memorandum dated September 9, 2004.
8. Sheet SP-1 of the plans shall be revised to correct the owner and co -applicant address
information for Summer Ice Joint Venture, prior to recording of the final plat plans. These
addresses are labeled as Summit Street in South Burlington, which doesn't exist.
9. Sheet SP-1 of the plans shall be revised so that the parking calculation information
corresponds with the Land Development Regulations, prior to recording of the final plat plans.
10. The plat plan for the entire Meadowland Business Park PUD, and the plat plan for the
Dubois property to the south, shall be submitted prior to recording of the final plat plans.
Staff recommends that the Development Review Board not approve Preliminary Plat application
#SD-04-61 and Final Plat application #SD-04-64, until such time as the requested revised plans
are submitted for review by Staff and the Development Review Board.
Respectfully submitted,
Brian Robertson, Associate Planner
Copy to: Bill Spencer, applicant
Permit Number SD- 61 - ( /
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW
All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested
information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected
and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide
pertinent information only.
i
1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#)
Summer Ice Joint Venture, 153 Summit Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 802-658-6320
Fax 802-658-0349
2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 387 Page 439
3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Spencer Terminal Holdings, c/o William
Spencer, PO Box 503. Avenue C. Williston, VT 05495 802-863-5062
Co -Applicants: Homer & Marie Dubois, 1405 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, VT 05403
802-862-8687 and Summer Ice Joint Venture, c/o Mark Neagley, 153 Summit Street, South
Burlington, VT 05403 802-658-6320
4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Ian A. Jewkes, Krebs & Lansing
Consulting Engineers, Inc., 164 Main Street, Colchester, VT 05446 802-878-0375 Fax 802-878-9618
5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS Swift Street Extension
6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1705-00125 (Summer Ice Joint Venture),
0860-01375 (Homer & Marie Dubois)
7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) The land is
currently undeveloped.
b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to
remain) The proposed use is for a 26,000 square foot trucldng terminal with 129,266 square feet of
parking area and circulation drives on a 20-acre parcel located on Swift Street Extension.
c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain)
The proposed building has 7,500 square feet of office space and 18,500 square feet of distribution
and related storage space.
d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain,
specify if basement and mezzanine) 1 story, maximum height 27.50 feet
e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) NIA
f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office
employees The maximum number of employees is 50. The number of company vehicles is variable.
The average on site should be approximately 17.
g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above,
please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Relocation of 200 foot buffer and recreation path.
8) LOT COVERAGE
a) Building: Existing 0 % Proposed 2.9 %
b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc)
Existing 0 % Proposed 17.6 %
c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 0 % Proposed %
9) COST ESTIMATES
a) Building (including interior renovations) $ 1,200,000
b) Landscaping: $ 23,170
c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) Total site work = $360,000 (paving $132,000;
gravel $129,000; storm drains $46,500; water and sewer $14,000; electric $8,500; miscellaneous
$30,000)
10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC
a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) 323 WE
b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) 22 WE
c) P.M. peak hour for entire property (in and out) 36 WE
11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (24 hour trucking operation)
12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday (7 days per week trucking operation)
13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Fall 2005
14) PLANS AND FEE
Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular
size copies and one reduced copy (I 1" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application
fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A).
14) SITE PLAN AND FEE
A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5)
regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan
application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit
A).
I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is
accurate to the best of my knowledge.
SIGNATUREJDF APPLICANT
SIGNATURE OF - PP ICANT
SIGIV�TURE OF CO -APPLICANT
� P;
SIGNATURE O R ERTY OWNER
ter~
IGNA RE OF PROPERTY OWNER
Do not write below this line
DATE OF SUBMISSION /� 6
REVIEW AUTHORITY: �evelop I ment Review Board Director, Planning & Zoning
I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be:
omplet Inc plete
ire or 0 lanning & Zoning or Designee bate
SPENCER TERMINAL HOLDINGS
SWIFT STREET EXTENSION
South Burlington, Vermont
ABUTTERS LIST
July 28, 2004
Project Parcelm Sumer Ice Joint Venture
153 Summit Street
Burlington, VT 05401
Tax Map 1705-00125
(All under 0860-01150)
Co -Applicant Parcel
Homer & Marie Dubois
1405 Hinesburg Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 0860-01375
Abutters
Chase Properties & Development, Ltd
PO Box 2283
South Burlington, VT 05407
Tax Map 0254-00005
Green Acres, Inc.
PO Box 2123
South Burlington, VT 05407
Tax Map 0860-R1150
Munson Earth Moving
85 Shunpike Road
Williston, VT 05495
Tax Map 1705-00107
Diane J. Wessel
70 Highland Terrace
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 0850-00070
Scott L. & Roberta S. Pennington
26 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 1002-00026
03225:abutters list
Larry W. & Ginette D. Brainard
28 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 1002-00028
Donna A. lee
30 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 1002-00030
Russell J. & Pamela A. Smith
32 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 1002-00032
Anthony A. & Diane P. Graziano
34 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 1002-00034
Paul A. & Charyl P. Houchens
36 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 1002-00036
David W. & Heather H. Main
38 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 1002-00038
John M. & Susan M. Hood
28 Dubois Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 0575-00028
Robert M. & Linda H. O'Kelly
30 Dubois Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 0575-00030
Ralph J. & Jeanette M. Mitchell
32 Dubois Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 0575-00032
j
KREBS & LANSING
Consulting Engineers, Inc.
August 9, 2004
Ray Belair
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
Re: Final Subdivision Plat Review
Dear Ray:
164 Main Street
Suite 201
Colchester, VT 05446
Telephone (802) 878-0375
Fax (802) 878-9618
On behalf of our client, Spencer Terminal Holdings, we request the City of South Burlington
consider the enclosed Final Subdivision Plat Review Application jointly with the previously
submitted Preliminary Subdivision Plat Review scheduled for September 21, 2004.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
AlA. Jew s, P�Ef
/sml
Enclosure
03225:final plat cover letter
Permit Number SD- b I -
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW
All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested
information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected
and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board.
1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#)
Summer Ice Joint Venture, 153 Summit Street, South Burlington, VT 05404 phone 658-6320
2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page#) Book 387 Page 439
3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Spencer Terminal Holdings, c/o William
Spencer, PO Box 503, Avenue C Williston VT 05495 phone 863-5062
Co -applicants - Homer & Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, VT 05403
phone 862-8687 and Summer Ice Joint Venture c/o/ Mark Neagley,153 Summit Street, South
Burlington VT 05404 phone 658-6320
4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Ian A. Jewkes
Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Inc. 164 Main Street, Colchester VT
5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS S�I6 &P-54114 4N0
6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1705-00125 (Summer Ice Joint
Venture 0860-01375 (Homer & Marie Dubois)
7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) The land is
currently undeveloped
b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to
remain) This proposal is for a 26,000 square foot trucking terminal with 129,266 square feet of
parking area and circulation drives on a 20 acre parcel located on Swift Street Extension
c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) The
proposed building has 7,500 square feet of office space and 18,500 square feet of distribution and
related storage space
d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain,
specify if basement and mezzanine) 1 story, maximum height 27.50 feet
e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain)
0 Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office
employees): The maximum number of employees is 50. The number of company vehicles is
variable. The average on site should be approximately 17.
g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above,
please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) /20'Loci4rraA,- or '000)cu f3K Fig=E�2
I}W,b 4?0C e4_'A 71`0N /0,4 i 74
h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc.
g) WETLAND INFORMATION
a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property?
b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50'
buffers?
Ale
c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the
Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application:
1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the
applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map.
2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations
(applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria).
9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed)
a) Size of Parcel:
b) Building Coverage:
Existing 0 square feet %
Proposed 2� f 0620 square feet %
c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc):
Existing d square feet _ _ _%
Proposed square feet % �• %
2
d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only):
Existing (V square feet O %
Proposed square feet %
10) WAIVERS REQUESTED
a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks.
height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking
11) COST ESTIMATES
a) Building (including interior renovations) $
b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) $ 2 3 "V
c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) i Jaxk 360, ooG
12) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC
a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out)
b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out)
c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out)
3 ,z 3 v %"C':
.Z,Z V i
3G VTR
13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 9AA1 �;- 1A V h01612- e �el' 5 7�4-"'
14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION / ALjr/
15) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE
16) PLANS AND FEE
w F4 4f lk �
Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one
reduced copy (11 " x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time
of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A).
3
14) SITE PLAN AND FEE
A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5)
regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan
application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit
A).
I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is
accurate to the best of my knowledge.
SIGNATURE F APPLICANT
SIGNATURE OF - JPICANT
SIGIP�TURE OF CO -APPLICANT
SIGNATURE 04RriPERTY OWNER 44
IGNA RE OF PROPERTY OWNER
Do not write below this line
DATE OF SUBMISSION
REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Director, Planning & Zoning
I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be:
Complete Incomplete
Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date
I
1
1
1
I I
\ \ 1
� 1 1
♦\ \ 1 --- ___ I
1 pp Cot 4
\� I Lot 10 p3 1 O Chose Properties &
7 '^ Lot 1 Development, LTD. I
Summer /ce ✓o/nt
1'a Summer Ice ,loint - 1 1 ✓o/ 597 P.481
Venture
J
1 Vol 387 P. 439 I 1 Vo% 3B7 P. 439
\ 1 - - -- - - - - - Green Acres, 8
J Vol 213 P. 168
Meodow/ond Oriw
I
Spencer Termino/ Holdings LLC - Applicant I
Lond Al? Site
/ Lot .3 I,
/ Summer Ice Joint Venture
Lot 2 Vo% J87 P. 439
Munson Earth Moving' I
/ Vol 651 P. 157
_ alt & Roberto Pennington 1 - Vol 209 P. 326-
_r - I Homer & Marie Dubois
Larry & Ginet t e Brainard I Vol. 179 P 126
1 1 v 1 Vol 211 P.281 I
1 I I r 1
1
I
1 Homer ct Marie Dubois I
Donna A. Lee Vol. 179 P.116
Vol. 357 P.139 I
,
IRussell & Pamela Smith
Vol. 265 P.40
Q I
- - Anthony & Diane Gror/ono
Vol 218 P.195
n
- - Paul & Cherl Houchens
Vol. 500 P.162
- - Dovid & Heather Mo/n
Vol. 454 P.85
- - - _ Robert & Linda O%Celly I
Vol. 211 P. 41 /
✓ohn & Susan
Hood 1
VoL J23 P.430 1
ub
ors Ralph & ✓eonnette /
Mitchell
- 1 1 Vol. 212 P..i6
1 I ,
1 1 11 1 - - �— Diane J. Wessel
Vol. 194 P.142 -- -
Spencer Terminal Holdings, LLC. — Applicant
Land Air Corporate Headquarters
Abutters
Green Acres, Inc.
Vol 1/3 P.168
SPENCER TERMINAL HOLDINGS
SWIFT STREET EXTENSION
South Burlington, Vermont
ABUTTERS LIST
July 28, 2004
Project Parcel
Larry W. & Ginette D. Brainard
Summer Ice Joint Venture
28 Knoll Circle
153 Summit Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
Burlington, VT 05401
Tax Map 1002-00028
Tax Map 1705-00125
(All under 0860-01150)
Donna A. lee
30 Knoll Circle
Co -Applicant Parcel
South Burlington, VT 05403
Homer & Marie Dubois
Tax Map 1002-00030
1405 Hinesburg Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
Russell J. & Pamela A. Smith
Tax Map 0860-01375
32 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Abutters
Tax Map 1002-00032
Chase Properties & Development, Ltd
PO Box 2283
Anthony A. & Diane P. Graziano
South Burlington, VT 05407
34 Knoll Circle
Tax Map 0254-00005
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 1002-00034
Green Acres, Inc.
PO Box 2123
Paul A. & Charyl P. Houchens
South Burlington, VT 05407
36 Knoll Circle
Tax Map 0860-R1150
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 1002-00036
Munson Earth Moving
85 Shunpike Road
David W. & Heather H. Main
Williston, VT 05495
38 Knoll Circle
Tax Map 1705-00107
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 1002-0003 8
Diane J. Wessel
70 Highland Terrace
John M. & Susan M. Hood
South Burlington, VT 05403
28 Dubois Drive
Tax Map 0850-00070
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 0575-00028
Scott L. & Roberta S. Pennington
26 Knoll Circle
Robert M. & Linda H. O'Kelly
South Burlington, VT 05403
30 Dubois Drive
Tax Map 1002-00026
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 0575-00030
Ralph J. & Jeanette M. Mitchell
32 Dubois Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax Map 0575-00032
03225:abutters list
U"ITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANT E14G & ZONL�IG
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
September 1, 2004
Summer Ice Joint Venture
153 Summit Street
Burlington, VT 05401
Dear Property Owner:
Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an
application for development on property located near your property. This is being
sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the
proposed development.
If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call
this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule
public hearing.
Sincerely,
Betsy Mckhou9 h
Administrative Assistant
Encl.
SPENCER TERMINAL
Corporate Headquarters
SOUTH B URLING TON, VERMONT
INDEX.
Sheet
SP-1
Site Plan
Sheet
SP-2
Utility Plan
Sheet
SP-3
Grading Plan
Sheet
SP-4
Landscape Plan
Sheet
SP-5
Lighting Plan
Sheet
A-1
Elevations
Sheet
D-1
Details
Sheet
D-2
Details
Sheet
D-3
Details
REc
city of e <�
U��n9ton
AREOS & LANSINC 164 Blain Street
ooee sir a zaw Colchester
Cons7ilti�cq_ Vermont 05446'
�A+�r aT?75 �'-�. Engineers InC. B02-B7B-0975
I
I
Lot 7 _ —
\ Summer Ice joint VCn uro—
\
------- -- - � B'hx our=I95. IS'
-. _ .�.....n Al. ew-atmdha r'uy"y eigl \
., slwiz wnc •,----
Ren-2gd0' sc 8, PC
B ><�
-- _ — —1922r
'
---. tcL ----- 71
0X
'�. .'.
aaa i
I U.#�fM
r
1 ! 7
I 200.5 .srasra� ••� �
dr�eor:.n \i\
Pond
i O f HMO
1 \
1 APcrox.
—ing damage \\\\I 1 \��
� CYss // wNandQQ
1
i � f
1111 ; \ low
1111 I 1
111 I I /
I11 11
yy /
\�ili � ill
,YJ i
i
Lot 2
I t I
N
Munsoon Earth
Mving
t 1
1
Notes-
lI.
ms <r nor o boaadwr w r Prmerrr /nos sno.n o-e non, o pan enddee
7/eal Nmdr PoYr" br Oil Fngireern Asmriafes
I I
a
i4ff
o Lot 4
Chose Properties — — --
'Development, LTD -
In
o_--F---
--- ja ----------
OLJ1®
0
I II
I ,ul f
x
Proposed
.W—sd'NYAC
Office
7, 500 s. f. I I 1 1
fF 2070' - I-- I l l l j
/1111,
�
----- _ -__ omP r t ^ .....
l!l�! reroring eal' \ \\ 11111
edosnre :�4 r liilj G
rd+r\e. see 0efwls
111111,l
,�
I
<_ 11111
a
I
} r Ail—
fill
1 1 11
9� � 1 \ 111111
I
� fF�20ZO" i 1 J IIII11 i
1 11111 � ,,IIIII t I Ills
Inu '
I �t fff ; Inn
;un i
Iln•
lnl
� r
t . �111
I 111, 1
202.75 ; 1 ,II111
t 1 , 111,1
I igllA
1
,y I 11
TO
f4yIt
2. ACuffm pr prfY I --are Fom Ci(Y of Swfh M BuAin9ton I x cps (in 1 `\\�� '� • — — —�—w'M �''\ Il„l�y
e/9/tw /9arrl
N/F Ir •�..
H.\$ J. Dubois
Pedesennn 08JAi'
1 — 288.03 I �Fosemenl IN®
S 8459 J6"
jjjf.jl'
Lot j
Summer Ice Joint Venture
Area=20"2 acres
p /// Met/md
N 824935" .E — —
'-- 1042.51'
landscoplh
Schedule
Unit
E O ted
Oescipth—
A'x pianh'ty
skmbw
- Cost
A—trpn Pi—
8"-lo" t%
2S
®
$495
f11,385
Red Nth^
2-1/2- c f
5
v.7
Ow
f;WO
Palmate Ash
2-1/1' cd.
5
fA
1450
f2,250
/ s Pv.uylwYr "A�ro'1'
Oen A—
78- sp✓ead
6
Q a'
SIXf6t1%
db'dmM'mb`
F'berry : Shwmrocw"
2 9aoYon
25
o
f8o
f2000
.#upd.. •do �"
Burning Bush
X tdt
6
-hem
Oo
IJ60
1 AR
X two
19
=✓. w
$125
2,375
M.vibFd '
✓aP — R 9 p'-64W
2-1/2- a..
4
�M
tW
fI,2A0
f2.z170
RECE/V
EFD
_je 9
cil
a �C
9t®n
Btu,
0' 20' M' 80' 120' 160' 200'
Bar SCC/e 1- - 40•
0ere rowed oeedprtw, cneao-ee �ro
Des1gn Drawn AIMP FLandscape P/an
Checked
Scale 1 - 'w' Corporate Headquarters
Dote "f272 Land Air
Project 0J225 Swift Street Extension-/hnesburg Rd South Burlington, Vermont
ARF,8Se & LlNS'JNC Consulting Engineers /nC. --` SP-¢
1B4 Aain .Stree4 Colchester, rermont a"4re
I I
o I Lot 4
F I Chase Properties7D.
& — — - ----- -. -_ -
1 o Development, L—_
5• _
Lot 7
Summer lee bHt ►@Rtury
- - — —_� 80' Bow
'-
- -rip v a-k, S'=,BS19 .. '. •----- - 845936 W
StreetFXteffe7en x w �. �" _ , Y' Y a
e SWo 55r1R 'w Ll
e'mK J921T
_ a 6
m Y i f to
- e' u,, our=19zz,' "*' er,� - P- .:,s= P P �/,. [ •- c k
�� _ — - +• .`F =e . (rLI� q. �-- _'s=.1\ .. y a- P�Z� ri 4ifPd _ 1" CYasa ,N wtroM
_-_ - -�A s 't ,�.•' #. GYid values ore the ri/ummonce
provided by m the new lighting,
Appror roeornm o/�` - - _ - - - - S`- •' y y P s : -. 6 foot -comes os cdcu/ofed by
edsraq damage d' •, a Yla �,'. v + - - s, Luxkm, V2.3.2, by Cogoer Lighting.
.seas' 1. s,-, ,w • f' , . - ,.. �' " t:
r 1 '•� ` Y
Y TYPE ° TYPE
Pond io.s•xicL� ON Hl
.s
Proposed Building , ` *
0.taarrtow Nka»harce LeM✓s
j.( 1 foot --de
Ofrrce -..L T �-_ 0..2 foot-conde
7,500 s.f f. A 03 fool -cadre
iii
TrPNN - sF ono 0.5 foot-
ro_, 1.0 e
• Y > 2.0 foot--dY.
\_.� 30 foot -comae
.10 foot-ea,de
i{` Y Y ' Y
-fi 1• T' } 1 9 1
APPa�.as lorolw+ o/—\ '1 ?• 4/ r r ) y ,, ' .KEY W' 7 Lot 3
i tin droina9s u a
9 � LAY r } YF :, ,• , v ? � ., Summer /ce Joint Venture
j`.� ,,.:- Y r;y `•- +f 2070. ,,� Area=20.2 acres
rIPE A
.
P de mounted � P
Lumrnoire Lumork
Prrooaee ,, tP v'.. s # ! (•vy - Y Mwnme� area
toff, 175
tu 0l4h
moW 25
" h'
LY /// wet/md
. y
\ •, y °. y. a Y Y• s 7 Bose cover
1 �. Y r' ,ice-', . � 1 [ t- " '} -� 11=1 • ' I � s m�,.r errrg s
y ( �, ' P L- ! # i': recommendations 7w / ndotions.
' ',.4' y v *F I•� f s*.Y'� +�'- ` ,, TjpICO/ Area Light Detail
N.T.S.
82
1042.51
3" E _ F
I /�/-83I I p H. ✓ Dubois
LUMARK'
�"^� � isnfwlblr.ra.J..t �e�ywXlwL.r.
r r+�e IIrIMCh:
TYPE
Lu_* MN Comp t Mb'/ M-
10 roll Mefd-na/ide, ": Farwmn o. ervectar
wmr uounr,d of la e
LUMAkK l
0
, C�
TYPE A
Lmrnaek tknutrer Area Llot
)l5 eo((, Ne(d-/rMMe, Argo Cutoff
Pde Younfed or 25"
0' T0' Aa' e0' )1Y!' 16ii' 100'
A
Bar SCOle 1 • _ 40•
vote
i
71
Drive-in Doors M— D— 1—g Da L—dhg Docks
EIL,5-r EI-EVA-FION
750,
OFF.
4' Roof Overhung
p
.T,
PF IV
comp
W.
ADMINISTRATION
TRUCK TERMINAL
14A
MAE
BREAK
Rom
-.A-g
N 4' Roof
T R
F
L
FF
FI-009'PMN - OFFUf
F - /!Y-O"
J'a 0,
L000Y"og D.— LosA g
WEST E1-EVA7-10N
r,s6,0"
F't Creen 1Ng
1l 0, 170'
Durk GroY or tbown
I., L 0
IX.0'
NOK'r" EL-DIA-FION
/11, ln"Ce
4'R—f Ow -g
— ftM dons
50UrH,ffUVA-r/0N
P - 151-0.
RECEIVED
AUG 0 9 2004
City of so. Burlington
FOR PERMIT REVIEW
i
I
Lot 7 —
Summer Ice joint Venture — —_ — —
-�— - "� 0 `" _ �w,Q� _7- -....• Plc Nofw=,Q99B.s7
a/o
SjfStreet Etsees,' B" m• avf=l95I5�
i�
al ------ ---
-�B
vovb192T1' P
BBM
_ e'c ryb _--- -----
_-
\y5 I
1 ----
I / -
--- ----- — - -
-
suv -
♦♦
.lqamc ko[ut/wv wJ
9 sew, .%
1 R1F,=1990'
Mv. r_1dlk5Y
Nw 091v
Rbn-201.5• .
sldOld Mv-1-19590' I
1
I SO' bvf/m
i 2our weBmre \ j
abwrsertrr�
I ? rrreal�,-I r•' .w..re ,«fo., r
Pond 1 '� i Mw mr=195.w•
I
/
I
j i I
I/ awwwwtlm� fp-r��a•r1IbI / \\
1
1
Fd� 1
I
1
1
I \
a
AetentRwr \
Ford $"
\
\
1
1
r \ Nnr prrar�
Hacroe
I sairtiq �Ww� I _..----••'-�y_.. _" •1 R4n=>99.0"
\,1 ; by out=196.9"
y CAm / wBbld \ New w+e
� I ;• Mv. ah
I °o° Proe.we as• i
I I E.wwww.t
4
/
1
1 � I
Lot 2
N/i Note:•
Munson Earth rand is rw, a bmraalwy r v gown rmas .bp.,r pa epa a Plan eanuae
Moving Pork" by aw Eng —, Assxiores.
2. gbaffhy pepwly /has ms o, n City of South BuHhyrm, ra Naas (h
egild /pmf. 1
---------------
N 8325 23�E
288-03r
- - 1
1
M.
o Lot 4
f � I
I
t c.
----------------
.4rrr�l III III MIT]
`/✓eve CB /T
=ZORY-
Nv ovf= 19B
Corr �,
a-
aammra, r \
rsed Buil ng
office s ao Hvnc
vae
7,500 s If.
rF 2070
rcfonm9 waI
_rr sn maaziro
!mice Sag OefaBs
AD-5s(pw
I New lywp003
0-2=
25'
hv. M=196d5'
Fr> 2070•.
shvcrvra'
Rein=I990'
1
i
L---
I
I Rbwr� secrww
javim F» Pared 'Ave
' 1 I
\ f
50' setback —.
1 1
N
I I H.J Dub"
PwWerr/wr
E veer
1 I 200' Zmhg Brf/w
II II I
N- ego
Rhr=202.25'
Mv. M=19K25
a
Mv. t-19615'
A' , Wj-7
fi n-2 25'
Mk' " 19563
hv, per=193 S5'
Rew 1P /8
Rhr 5"
-195 m
by =19510
rev. wrI-/9510'
Raw CB N S
Rhr=20iS (({L
-197. lnv. ourI97 A0'
O
S 84 59 36 w N
lix.31,
alias N/ ",ii-d
Lot 3
Summer ice Joint Venture
Areo=20.2 acres
Potable Water Supply and
Wastewater Design Flows-
Nbstewvter Disposal and Domestic llbter Supply Design Fbws
Flows for Smp/ayess
Type of emp/o).e Number
D — 40
Off/ce stoff/A/echanics to
roto, _p/oyms = 50 (aY shtfts)
flows for emp/oivvs = 50 emp. * 15 CPO/emp = 750 ORD
rota/ Design Flow = 750 GPD • 0.9 redrlctlon for water "M9
Oxturm : 675 GPO
ProFsct to be served by munlcgoa/ water and sewer
Legend
-' ewaawr
aN
aa.. a wmeaid
o
- -•-
- Ra...r_e..
� riwav w� mM•y
---v.—_-
Ave M/s'.w ywn
lx r�r
N 8249 35w .E-� — —
f042.51r
0' 20' 40' BO' 11a' 180' 200'
Bar scale 1 • = 40'
Dab -med
I Desrrlp— LHecked Gore
Design /A✓
Drawn F�/P
Utility P/an
Checked
Corporate Headquarters
Scale t- - �
Date .ixy272a0I
Land Air
Project M225
Swift Street Extension-Hrrresburg Rd. South Burlington, ✓Canon!
ARRRS & IUASIAW Consulting Rngmeers, Inc.
I64 !fain Street, Colchester, Vermont 9"4(6
I o Chase
Lof Prope4
rties &
Development, L10. — —
Lot 7 _ — -
---_y
\ Summer /ce Joint Venture
�� / Rim=705.99• --- '� 1 I
B" Inv. m=I95.29' ex. B� PVc
$_84 59'i6" {4
- Hew Nee sroneM9 _ — -- Ran za! 5'
egn /nv our 1965'
P2 R Street Exf°n �' �I _- 1331.31PW
'
Rm 92 _
B M M 19117'NO
\
__ _ 101 i
\�. n, \ IIII I _ _ - ----`` \\\\\\ \ '\\\ pass
, /// Ilsi/ard
^
emrq o�ucryoia 1 .9h i •\,1�1 I r '�', X / �l i �I. ' \ ,�;\\ / ii,i I ��
Mw PQ'I IIII S£
cy— // 10I.s' I I \ I d 1 / I.I 11'!
tland ! Mv. lM%Q7' I,1111 \ J I , .r%i'ck 013
� 1 III I \
1 w14.19190 i IU I I _ t =704. p l j
`�� M✓. our_ IM40 I i \� III
IIII
I ! (erred) \ % ese erM ax � / 1 / � 111i r \ / m•, B+ �I I I
Pond
Proposed Built .ee HVAc \ hills ` (^• /�
/ ❑ 1 11 I / Ilrllj j �./� 1
l \\ / Illil �y�$e�. vlli�ll ill L t
p
o 3 Illij 1 •V /0�
1\\\\ m,at --- m� r� G n
1\\ \,leroMm9 rd/ C/! ®a �V
i •--,.-J_.- � I 1 i \ 9h3 -` \`% \ 1 �\\ �� ___-`-Lo:n mvo.,ua :�, 11111 New a9 '1 •
. (� G
l f/ `. •�' Ijt1 I I t r '��\\4`\ \\ 1 , \`� II II I Mv. our=�97.I0' iI 1 0
etdl^ r i V
Inn
L�..._._J.7E 1 I I I I \ \ \`\\ \I 1.1 I NM. f8 11111 i !'✓/y.
/=tMJw�O t!1\�`�\\:\ it
1 1 I I I I J RMr=10125'
• f � �� - 11111 I I II 0 Nv M-l96.B5' � I ,
•\ '\ ` � �\ `\\ 1 11111 1 I i o'P My our=l96.73'1 y l l ll
'� '"i°,wem`KK•. �••` \� az
Lot 3
I m i 1 f1�1� I i
I Aanro. locena, , :v:._.._..-_------- ? am-,99a � " IIII I I g oz75 i i n .l i
exnrMy o-oMale� I it Me «rr=/9B.9• •`. ` \ IIII ; I 'I I J� i Summer Ice Joint Venture
\ aa. r weisw \ \; 11 1 I 1 I 1 I Area=20.2 acres
rn o I a" at re rr l I I I I
inn
\
v \'•� ^l\ �, �\ ` ` I 1o1.2 i He. ce F 1 zo Be
\D �\ `' :t✓ 1 \ = 1 1 1 My g %15
our-196.15 IIII
PM—.d 20' �1� •` 1 I I a I IIII I
I I Eanwt , _ I
x101.4 I M , Ili 1111 Legend --
0275 , 703 IIII
I ' � / I o I I cm nNx..r.rr m n• ..r
14
/' � �- �� I i1 I / i l I� � 11 I�II� CYosa /// wet/wW �nn. ra•.>
\ ay
/ • 77T j1 , II, II m✓•ree�,
-20J.0' I_ Rm=�oz�z's' fQliil
-'r `\ A 11 / I akuoruro Ell
My n-195B3 II1111 —.w• rxrry ,mwe a.,row
r I /// ` \ \\ N.. av�.l9).0' xc Mv. ouf=79335'1 111j1 m ewrM +•..,e=.nd.
1 ''' % J IiFl lii� ,I1:i1111, 11; ,.b e0o' x 2.7J
! 1 1 J 7�1 I,i 111 1111111 I `'' "/ IIII11
/ % 1 1% t I I I I 111%/ i I I Li He. ene aectw E R� 25' iilll
ou/-194.3' My M=19520 I i l l l l o' 10' b' BO' 110' 160' 100'
1 a �Il lllj �I�IgI I Ve+1B'AD'efU^
Lot ? t t iiiiii IIII l Ltr , a.003 uiiii
BOr SCO16 1"= 40'
Munson Earth Notes I� I illlllll 'dry lilt�41
Moving I 1. 1nu a ear o bauioWy r niyary IMes bo.,r aro nae a e,rnroa I ` i 1 11 1 arebay,� I I 1 i'y _ - _ _ _ _ I11
I
]/eadoe/wrda Pak' by dW En9Mewkr9 Aasocbres l @ I 1 I 1 I 1 1 _ _ _ - - - ® 11 I 1 �
I z la r� y M., a. na orr a nee swra �. (M I, � � i 11 i � N 82 49'3")
_ _
/ MI /
�-
-- •� ___-_ +� area , n
etbock '
• �' .1spr srMu9e ^I� own
_ '\\\ OoN rolkee Oeaep rion Checkee Dole
l I
--- �_ � F r � •S.1d'7 I Design /.9✓ Grading P/an FA,P
1 _ — _ 1
2523e E "� \ `\ Scale ° Corporate Headquarters
N 83' _ �� wgee..e p. H. ct .L Dubdts scale /- 40'
Date Jdy1L
2
88.0,3 Land Air
�e r 2004
I I 200' Z-M9 &1ff- Pro' cl Q1215 Swift Street Extension-Hmesburq Rd South BuNington, ve/mont
_ I I
I I I .Y/PLBS & L.4NS1W Consulting 8ngineers, Inc. 7_____ Sp
!64 Alain Street, CotcAester, Vermont 05446
Road Construction Notes
(Ail ee.- es ro odd w+ar mwr ro pokiq a m. ox w.a)
loft
1. New road shall be constructed to the /ore and grade shown an the drawings. The rood and ufd'ty locations shop be typically
4' bit
detailed unless otherwise shown.
earls
!-1/2' Tjpe /N
LYewe xirp a.rr Nry emted
/Qo rod 2•ppe
2 Methods for construction of sub -base shall cant [a Vt. Highway Specs. (1990), ?O.i 12 'svbgrode' I, oil respects Oros
2 1/7' Tjpe p
—1 ropy
rod lo9d
determined by the Engineer.
see s'te pion for moss slope ( X
'-
J. Gave/ sub -base for pavement shall conform to Vt. Highway Specs (1990), 704. 05 table 704. 05A co—
bft—lhaus concrete pawmmt
4. LO-1kg course sha// conform to Vt. Highway Specs 1990, 704. 05 table 704.05A, rme Shoulders shall conform to section
5h Y ( )
-... st se U.shed,grouch ;.p[
J/e' A tnae
704.12, Aggregate for Shouldx-
99re9
•4'rfF¢ g course +r'-05A viler.
5 Bituminous concrete pent shall conform to Lt. Highway Specs (1990) Section 406. Binder coarse shol/ be type lI d9d
Fj
runmh -earring coarse steal/ be type3Y.
K,
sore -kg k,.sas
6. Any sub -base or subgrode disturbed by Contract-, or rendered unwitable by construction mochnery shall be remowd and12r
'04,
i .. COW" -
(h
Co-, p-< ppe
block `[' red
6'-0"
replaced with epprowd granular backfe/. Sub -base shall haw 95X of moxknum compaction density before road construction.
d—wLe.
7 The Contractor sholl be responsible for all compoctim tests far the road, foundotions and utility trenches.
9erKee :
Geen m/f coated roX.
B Fill material for rood embankment shall be approved by the Engineer. Fill shall be placed in 6' lifts and wetted and compacted
with sotielbl, y compaction equpment. The Contractor shop perform 2 canpaction tests every 100' at the limits of
density, d Proctor).
" 1? ymd:.f,W.(xTOJ II3
the tiling goeratim and shall recompact oreas with less than 95X of maxknum (Stand
�� � la9Melr
9 Ohm applicable, the Contractor shad follow Vt. Highway Specs (1990) Section 2al 11 for placing and spreading embankments
ILT �� iY'�-�T'1
I I_ I I (—
-
I 1-I
2" rink,, s" ono,.
to awo. urstwg g es _
Vwad tech (rya.)
10 Road n fil/ sections steal/ be placed and compacted a minlmum Installed, 3 feet above top of my utility to beInstalled,bel-e
trench is excowted for ppe placement, In trenches and cut sections the Contract- shall prorrde a/l necessary sheeting,
Mwori 500X and or mderdnh I I • • •—i e III—
I (—I I I
-1 I I I 111-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I"•
—�
10' dimetw (tip)
-
sharing and brocng to maintain compliance with al/ OSHA/Vv&YA regulations
as Ordered by engineer
I ��I—� 1—� I( —I
11. Sand f7f/ sho/I —to- to Vertu-t Highway SOeel6eati-s (1990) 70303, table 703.O3A.
1 _
tkie posts set ro o WPM of 2' 40' h o
10- ei ,et- q~h .d,q%d bob, J'-6-
lArad rrM concrete.
Cote fi-nes Ma be 2" an dye a ,w ee o by Me
dwthg w -d shop be emiehed erth a the
tmg, Pants she be -vypM with brace rod
Meer -Y /I. ,
are hues rod !o e' l,, t to ewnes. J' dimmer- gate
poab shot be used b gates long- Man 4 leer
T ical Pave
t Cross Section
Trash Enclosure Detail
Mohr Dn'ww o are hat crowned, but -e p-- lewted os
N. rs
n..s.
shorn in the detod, below when viewed ham Swift street
Extension, facing south, each m-way slopes toward the
proposed bopding of 1/4' per foot.
% driwwpy
I two 2' too file ur eirumhavr
4av-w
pow'
g u� ro
ADT — 4LK aJ
I
r-fr
12' - O'
12' - O"
4' L — `20M mase
I2' grev.' seebasr� e' saw
70404 cams Mkee hYk 500x AOT Spec'. JgIQ7
1IhBm/ee oNrAgd
9-- among to be 24'
drga*e motwtw' .Shed W
m n..
Proposed Drive Detail
IV. TS
Frame A' cow,
N ate R-1642,
Let,-- LC 266 - squa
BHtk /awing sou
(5) roursee max.
(2) courses inn.
Do not mart- aside face of bri J,.
use red
h-'-.d sews bilk only.
Provide cast in p/ e
steps when depth
teed 6' flan, rkn
to nwf.
Use polyprop)+ e
pnstk rungs with
f122" node 60 steel
f-cwnent Or equal
inn•
Asphalt coat
kte.fk
Urrdsru bed motor-' -- /
Fhm does to alai!
Gout hone to bkak
Aetoak bhG's bsfam
ma-tanrng
Boat A/ wltA arosdrod grow/
Cwnpocf to 95X Of
m—h— awn Y
1 (Stand-d A-ocf-)
-O' Rag gasket - Mantic
AS7M C478 )',—t rant--ced
cono.te mardnas and ca -
by Cawp Pr.00lt aowold -aqua!
Do not m-fa Asw fore
of manha ..
M-hoe she'/ be -ovum tested
end. lowest pkrt Is still exposed.
gwnoew -.drd
-C t kin Place - prase -.sea/
gasket to, a/ ppe pwnel-ti-s.
14==si e c-o"ewbrL
4G1�0 pte
ro 1 1/2" cnshee storm
Detail
New Sanitary Manhole
(Dog House Style)
N T.s
NOT:
1. Sewer !work- ro -tor mars shop be m a-.Vb ce w/M
the ;ecromm-deal et-db ran sewage works• --coped
ran ,tat. a,n rde
2. Sewws shoe be isle at /east 10 feet Ao tapy limn y
exafhg - prgd - ant - Me bet-ce ~ be
.nedwrree edge to edge, ff !ha eb-ce cannot es abrakwq
thin Me Apes shoe be hstel/M acca Chg to Mee. 1p d tp
w0te,
Sdecf bark/l/ ccmpactad (d Meade r- werw
6" f �95.[ stand-d 1B' inn. (dose sz) aw.ke
proctor density. —�-
O Sewer
S.wws arosshg ante, mans slid/ be 1ek1 fo
,,O d o nha wrfkw distance of le"
tel - piles. Sewer pants ww be egrdrf-f
e -for os possbb horn the w i--
phfs Ah- tt a kn,—s fa dram
prop -as sews" .wind be designed -d
--led ears ro -rw ppe -d sbe be
pressure tested to asswe-twfghrnen
paw fo bxkakg.
Sewer / Water Separation Detail
N T.5
D+2'
ro noew .z.ehg
rlw c-boar- sad es
oral - -s
n--Mb b P'lM
a9G - IfI.WA
f>�w,g
eroMW +�YtlY
rgvWfkne
eddka mor-w ,ha
-
roh no er-., venew
rib- 3' h olmrwtw -
95X 90,T
kom ! nMs doY o"
9[mdad stmd
-1Pt�NRs are
proof- prat[-
canped a ndknf.d
Uss .vend a w 114' ro 314"
aurae ere,- W oral-- by -
o
o/�
.are �r».se emo mawam
maw ewadge Pwe) _
T' R jkl sryorown nabrhn
( A �w/dM -d !alas
6
Fw eennwr-
J%' fe J%" waN a See rx-e M ad pas
ere. d.,rrrhe wrw, r>Pa are
uwarmb.d motors/
Scnitory Trench Detail
N.T.S.
Construction Notes
1. The Contractor wp/ be responsible for al/ construction of water man, storm and smil y sewer systlens as shown on the pions He will be
respons.Dte for a necess-y adapters httng; etc. to make connections to the existing and proposed uAlihes The Contract- shd/ be
responsible for all work shown ar implied an the plans md/ referenced in the specirrcotions and permits fie Contractor spat/ submit f
rppro-I by the Engineon all types of mated and products used
Sanitary &Storm Mains
1. The pipe for smif y sewer and storm shah be PYY' gravity sewer ppe SOR 35 (ASTMD 3034) with rubber sealing rags All ppe shall
be laid to the /ere and grade shown an the plans.
2 fie installed sanitary sewer ppe shall be low pressure air tested in the presence of the Engineer. After ppe aoanng, the ppe
sect/ (m-ho/9 to manhole) slip/l be tested act -ding to the following procedures, An Interne ppe pressure of 4 pounds per square
inch greater than my back pressure due to a water table shall be created. A mnsnum of two (2) minutes shag be allowed far
temperature stmillmtim. fie ppe section shall be crosidered ocamiab/e whin, tested at a pressure of J pounds per square inch
great- than my bock pressure, the section does not lose am at a rote greater than a0030 cfm/s. f. of internal ppe area,
Separation of Water and /or Sonitory & Storm Mains
1. No water main shall be N than ten (10) feet [o any smlt y sew, storm -wer or sonit-Y mmhale and In, (5) feet to any catch
basin. P,oride minimum of 18' vertical separation between water man and storm/emit y sews,
resting and Now.
In add'tion to the obow requirements, a// water /nee and sewer hoes and manholes shall be thoroughly tested by the Cmtroct- In accordance
with the Enwronmenta/ Protection Rules 9/l0/82, Appendix A, Section A-02(JW) and A-04(GdH).
Note: Al/ consimcton shall be attarnil/shed in accordance with the standards set f-th in the latest edition of the public works
Vsc/rrmtkn of the City of South Burtmgton and referenced specipmt/ons n the case of c-01,t, the move strngmt speclfkotion slid/ pop/y
Cmtroct- shop keep a log book of of least three swing ties to service locations and y po' is of depectim - -t- anon Rttngs. Books
shah be turned awr to the Owner upon acceptance of wall.. Porallons to the top of novice. lly/ 9(so be recorded
e\CG,'j�7lVAi�
AUG 09
Z0
L'%jy of S
0e01
6MOP
FOR PERMIT REVIEW
Erosion Control and Construction Sequence
1, fie purposes of erosion control shot/ be discussed with and approwd by the Engineer and the Town of Williston prior to any
c/eanhg, grubbing, stripping or construction of any kind.
2 A// erosion control shod/ be placed as shown an the drawings or as ordered by the Engineer A// erosion control measures shall be, at
a m/n/mum, inspected weekly and maintained to fulfill the intent discussed above. fie Contractor shall mointoin the erosion control
measures until the Engineer is satisfied that permanent ground carol has been established and that further measures are not
required
3 Nhen erosion control measures are deemed no longer necessary, al/ materials detained including silts and construction debris shall be
collected and dsposed of in a manner acceptable to the Engineer and the rown of IN7/iston.
s. if nigh/y erodible sods are encountered the Controctor may be required to provide pte malting, gabfan ar nwt mattresses, rip
lop or other measures as necessary to prereit erosfan. the Cantroctor shol/ stockpNe hay boles to protect, at a mnrnum, all
work in progress. A// exposed embankments --rid/ be topsoAed, seeded and mulched as soon as possble after canshuctron.
5 fie Contractor shall use water and/br calcium chloride itr dust control The Contractor shelf also sweep Leroy Rood as required to
maintain dust control
Steel states airs+ an down &— side of / -
Srow leace or Al—fi En.+iofmce
J/ro6 En.rofm+cr or
41kdf foal ate, Jobric Filter fabric on upstream side
staple fWAa to f ce
Form 12- deep trench Stare A
/ay fabrk' m bottom
rnver with g v ens
—1.1
At flaw �I e
li I FOR PERMIT REVIEW
IJ I I i
Section A —A A m�plans pirm, pare . we s. prro aw
T iyn co/ Temporary Silt Fence
Erosion Control Barrier
N. T.S
AND PEDAL STEEL
ITS W/GORDON STONE:
s teaching experience.
ngs and Live appearances
i, Moe, Strangefolk and
Cowboys. 863-4497 or
rdonstone.com.
BASS AND ACOUSTIC
5-string banjo, guitar,
ongwriting and more.
iced teacher, very afford -
es. Any style/level/inter-
ly, 802-658-2462 or
75@hotmail.com.
FIDDLE instruction with
ced dance band musi-
Levels. Technique and
phasized. Peter
ne, 802-759-2268,
c@gmavt.net.
ET LESSONS for all
ginner to intermediate
Start the school year
or pick up an old
all Heather for rates,
J questions. 318-8199.
NO LESSONS for all
un from a patient and
:ed teacher. Andric
802-310-6042.
Berklee graduate with
background offers tes-
uitar, theory and ear
Individualized, step-by-
oach. I enjoy teaching
tyles/levels. Call Rick
: 864-7195.
LIS
TEARING NOTICE
f Burlington is submit-
msolidated Plan Annual
ce and Evaluation
PER) on the expendi-
mmunity Development
�t and HOME Invest-
iership Act funds for
m year ending June
o the U.S. Department
& Urban Development.
Copies of the Report will b
available beginning Septe4,
10, 2004, at the Community &
Economic Development Office,
149 Church Street, Room 32, City
Hall, Burlington, VT 05401 and
online at http://www.cedo
burLington.org/cdbg/cdbg.htm.
The public is encouraged to
review the Report and to com-
ment, through September 28,
2004. A Public Hearing on the
Report will be held at the City
Council meeting of Monday,
September 20, 2004, in
Contois Auditorium, City Hall.
Comments will be heard at the
Public Hearing on the Report
and on housing and community
development needs.
For more information, or infor-
mation on alternative access,
contact Margaret Bozik,
Community & Economic
Development Office, at 865-7171
/ 865-7142 (TTY).
PUBLIC HEARING
SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVEL-
OPMENT REVIEW BOARD
The South Burlington
Development Review Board wilt
hold a public hearing at the
South Burlington City Hatt
Conference Room, 575 Dorset
Street, South Burlington,
Vermont on Tuesday, September
21, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. to con-
sider the following:
1. Final plat application #SD-04-
60 of White Rock Development,
LLC, to subdivide an undeter-
mined size parcel into two (2)
parcels, parcel #1 being of unde-
termined size and parcel #2
being 0.055 acres. Lot #2 will
then be further subdivided into
two (2) lots to be added to the
rear of 444 and 446 Country Club
Drive.
2. Preliminary plat application
#SD-04-61 and final plat applica-
tion #SD-04-64 of Spencer
Terminal Holdings for a planned
unit development consisting of:
1) construction of a 26,000 sq ft
distribution and related storage
building with more than 15% of
the GFA in office use for the
same tenant at 596 Meadowland
Dr, and 2) relocating a 200 foot
wide "no -construction" buffer
from 596 Meadowland Or to the
property to the south located at
the end of Dubois Dr.
Copies of the application are
available for public inspection at
the South Burlington City Hall.
John Dinklage, Chairman
South Burlington Development
Review Board
September 1, 2004
The Burlington Democratic
Committee will hold its nominat-
ing caucus for Justice of the
Peace on Tuesday, Sept. 7 at 7
p.m. at the First Congregational
Church at the corner of South
Winooski Ave. and Cherry Street.
For more information call city
chair Mary Sullivan at 862-6632.
► support groups
DON'T SEE A SUPPORT group
here that meets your needs?
CatL United Way GET -INFO (a
confidential help line) 652-4636,
Monday -Friday, 8:30 a.m. -
4:30 p.m.
ADD PARTNERS SUPPORT
GROUP forming. Does your part-
ner or spouse have ADD
(Attention Deficit Disorder)?
Would love to get together and
share experiences, support, chal-
lenges. Please contact addpart
ner@yahoo.com.
WEDNESDAYS CIRCLE: A
Transpersonal support group,
every Wed., 6 p.m., Innerharmony
Community Wellness Center, Rt.
100N, Rochester, VT. 767-6092. A
sharing circle focusing on person-
al growth, transformation, spiri-
tuaLity and heating, led by Jim
Dodds.
THE HEALING JOURNEY. The
Women's Rape Crisis Center offers
a confidential ten -week support
group for women who have sur-
vived sexual violence. Burlington -
area, call for location. 6-7 p.m.
Free. Info, 864-0555.
DISORDERED EATING SUPPORT
GROUP: Do you struggle with
anorexia, bulimia, or binge eat-
ing? I am looking to start a sup-
port group to help others and
myself in moving forward on the
road to recovery. If you are
interested in joining a new dis-
cussion/support group and are
over 20 yrs, please email Jessica
at jessLyn6 @yahoo.com.
Together we can
make smalls award to a
SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION
more fulfilling ntestyle.
New England: Info, Blythe
DECLUTTERS SUPPORT GROUP:
Leonard, 878-0732 or atbtytheL@
Are you ready to make improve-
aol.com.
ments but find it overwhelming?
WOMEN'S WEIGHT LOSS SUP -
Maybe 2 or 3 of us can get
PORT GROUP: Do we know what
together to help each simplify.
to do? Yes! Do we do it? Not
453-3612.
always! Sometimes the answer is
PARENTS TOGETHER: Support
mutual support — for free! Let's
group wilt be meeting in Rutland
decide together what works for
on Monday evenings. Snacks and
us. I want to start — do you?
childcare provided. All groups
Anne, 861-6000.
are free and confidential. Please
BIPOLAR SUPPORT GROUP
call Amy at 247-5460 for more
open to new members. Meets
information.
downtown. Our goal is to
WOMEN CHANGING: A continu-
become healthy and happy. For
ous educational support group
info, call Gerhard at 864-3103.
for women who are interested in
ALS (LOU GEHRIG DISEASE)
changing patterns in their lives.
monthly support group: For
Wednesdays -ongoing. 12:30-
patients, caregivers and Loved
2p.m. CaLL Angie at AWARE in
ones who are living or have lived
Hardwick, 472-6463.
with ALS. Third Thursday of the
SUPPORT GROUP FOR WOMEN
month, 1-3 p.m. Jim's House,
who have experienced intimate
1266 Creamery Rd., Williston.
partner abuse, facilitated by
Info and directions, 802-862-
Battered Women's Services and
8882 or vt@alsanne.org.
Shelter of Washington County.
AL -ANON: Thursdays, 12:30-
Please call 1-877-543-9498 for
1:30 p.m. at the AWARE office,
more info.
88 High St., Hardwick. Info,
REIKI SUPPORT GROUP: July
472-6463.
18, 1-3 p.m. Fletcher Free
WOMEN IN TRANSITION: Join
Library, Burlington. Alt levels of
a support/social group for
students and practitioners are
women who are separated or
welcome. For more info., contact
divorced. The goat is to form a
Joan at 860-4673 or Lynn at
circle of friends for support and
893-3064.
social activities. If interested
WANTED: Fellow painters to get
email Katherine at
together bi-weekly for coffee and
MKR27609@aol.com.
to discuss our work. Support
SMART RECOVERY: For info,
each others creativity! Show
contact Bob at 425-4058 or
your work. Meet at local down-
email carmody@madriver.com.
town coffee shops. Call 658-
BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION
2976, if interested.
of Vermont: Daytime support
AHOY BREAST CANCER SUR-
group meets the second Thursday
VIVORS: Join our support group
of each month at the Fanny Allen
where the focus is on living not
Hospital in Colchester, from 12-2
on the disease. We are a team of
p.m. For more info, contact Polly
dragon boaters. Learn all about
Erickson at 847-6941.
this paddle sport and its health-
METHADONE ANONYMOUS: A
giving, life -affirming qualities.
medication -assisted recovery
Any age. No athletic experience
support group. Tuesdays, 7-8
needed. Call Linda at 802-434-
p.m. The Atano Club. Directions:
4423 or email: dragonheart
Rt. 15 Fort Ethan Allen entrance,
vermont@gmavt.net or go to:
Barnes Ave., third right on to
www.dragonheartvermont.org
Hegeman Ave., #74 on left. All
EMOTIONS ANONYMOUS:
are welcome.
Fridays, 6-7 p.m. The Society of
TRANS PARTNERS support group:
Friends Meeting House, 173 N.
Meet and talk w/other partners of
Prospect St., Burlington. Free.
transgendered/transsexual people.
Info, 479-0684. 12-step program
The second Friday of every month.
designed to help women and
R.U.1.2? Community Center, 6
men with depression, negative
p.m. 860-RU12.
thinking or any mental/emotion-
HEPATITIS C SUPPORT group:
at problems.
Second Thursday of each month.
SELF REALIZATION: Social/sup-
McClure Multigenerational Center,
port group for like-minded peo-
6-8 p.m. Those who have hepati-
ple interested in spirituality,
tis, their friends and family
yoga, psychic experiences, tran-
members are welcome. 454-1316.
scendence and transformation.
ARE YOU A BUTCH, F2M,
Burlington. If interested, call Jill
StoneButch, TGButch, TransMan,
at 877-3375 or email
Femme, High Femme or any
jlo@together.net.
other description of Butch, FtM
NAKED IN VERMONT: The pre-
or Femme/feminine woman? If
mier Nudist/Skinnydipper organi-
so, join us as we plan fun activi-
zation in Vermont offering infor-
ties and offer each other
mation library, message board,
resources, support and friendship
chat room, yahoo group, and
within the Butch/FtM-Femme
more. (ALL FREE) Visit www.
world. For more info, contact
nakedinvermont.com.
Miss Morpheus at missmorpheusl
@yahoo.com.
Gaec krfS
�n
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPAIRTMENIT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
September 17, 2004
Ian Jewkes
Krebs & Lansing
164 Main Street
Colchester, VT 05446
Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings
Dear Mr. Jewkes:
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting
and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting
on Tuesday, September 21, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room,
575 Dorset Street.
If you have any questions, please give us a call.
Sincerely,
� f � F
i
Betsy M onough
Administrative Assistant
Encl.
KREBS & LANSING
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, AC.
164 Main Street
COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446
(802) 878-0375
FAX (802)Q8788�-9618
TO
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
l
upnrul' oy v e omwuam
i
DATE
JOB NO.
ATTENTION
-----------
RE:
tic� O -
;�oo�
ev .
❑ Samples
y10
the followin2items:
❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
C b`
S l C i�v
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval
❑ For your use
❑ As requested
❑ For review and comment
❑ FORBIDS DUE
REMARKS
❑ Approved as submitted
❑ Approved as noted
❑ Returned for corrections
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
COPY TO
SIGNED:
if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
18 NOVEMBER 2003
has the authority to limit accesses. There is also a driveway shown for Lot #3 very close to the
one being proposed for lot #1. He suggested a shared access for lot #3. Members agreed and
stipulation "n" was added as follows: Plans shall be revised to show a shared access drive with
Lot #3.
Mr. Kupferman noted that the Fire Chief has in the past been concerned about access to the rear
of buildings. This may create a problem. He also asked about stormwater. Mr. Llewellyn
showed the location of underground storage and holding pond.
Mr. Steinzor cited the danger of approaching this area incrementally, especially where the area is
in flux. He stressed that the existing traffic problems won't be solved by dumping more traffic
onto the streets. He suggested putting off a decision until there is a better context to work in.
Mr. Boucher noted there will be big issues to solve at Final Plat.
Mr. Boucher moved approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-03-56 subject to the stipulations
in the draft motion as amended above. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Messrs.
Bolton and Kupferman abstaining.
6. Continued Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-03-02 of JAM Golf, LLC to
amend a planned unit development consisting of 264 residential units and an 18-hole golf
course. The amendment consists of approval for "as built" berms located on the east side of
Dorset St. beginning at the Old Cross Road intersection extending north through the
Holbrook Road intersection:
Mr. Farley moved to continue this application until 6 January 2004. Mr. Boucher seconded.
Motion passed unanimously.
7. Sketch Plan Application #SD-03-71 of Land Air Express for a planned unit development
consisting of a 24,540 sq. ft. distribution and related storage building with more than 15%
of the GFA in office use for the same tenant, 596 Nleadowland Drive:
Mr. Boucher stepped down due to a conflict of interest as an adjacent property owner.
Mr. Willard noted the property is in Meadowlands Park and will be a corporate headquarters.
6840 sq. ft. will be office and the rest will be distribution and service.
Mr. Willard said they will address concerns in staff notes. Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to
meet with the Rec Path Committee.
Mr. Willard showed 8 acres of wetlands that will remain untouched.
Mr. Dinklage asked about the hours of operation. Mr. Willard said the facility would operate 24
M
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
18 NOVEMBER 2003
hours a day. Mr. Belair noted there are performance standards that limit noise that can be heard
from a property. Mr. Willard said they will screen the property with trees. He also noted that the
site is in a very low area.
No other issues were raised.
As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 11:00
p.m.
"An �1,(` i'
Clerk.
cy -
Date
-7-
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: November 12, 2003
\drb\sub\land air express\sketch Application received: September 18, 2003
LAND AIR EXPRESS
SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-03-71
Agenda #7 Meeting Date: November 18, 2003
Applicant Owner
Land Air Express of New England, Ltd. Summer Ice Joint Venture
115 Covington Lane 82 Church Street
Shelburne, VT 05482 Burlington, VT 05401
Engineer Property Information
Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. Tax Parcel 1155-00596-C
164 Main Street 10 District and Hinesburg Road -North Scenic
Colchester, VT 05446 View Protection overlay District
20.2 Acres
Location Map
I
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINu rON 2 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\subland air express\sketch
Land Air Express, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting sketch plan review of a
proposal to construct a 24,540 square foot building for distribution and related storage, with
>15% of GFA in office or other principal permitted use by same tenant, 596 Meadowland Drive.
The subject property contains 20.2 acres and is located in the Industrial and Open Space (10)
District.
The proposed use is a conditional use in the 10 District and the Hinesburg Road -North Scenic
View Protection Overlay District. However, in accordance with Section 15.03(A) of the Land
Development Regulations, the application is being reviewed as a PUD, so conditional uses do
not need separate conditional use approval.
Associate Planner Brian Robertson, referred to herein as Staff, has reviewed the plans
submitted on September 18, 2003 and has the following comments.
Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements
Table 1. Dimensional Requirements
10 Zoning District
Required
Proposed
�( Min. Lot Size
3 acres
20.2 acres
Max. Density
not applicable
not applicable
Max. Building Coverage
25%
2.7%
Max. Overall Coverage
40%
19.8%
Min. Front Setback
50 ft.
50 ft.
Min. Side Setback
35 ft.
280 ft.
Min. Rear Setback
50 ft.
200 ft.
Max. Building Height
35 ft.
24 ft.
zoning compliance
SUBDIVISION CRITERIA
Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations,
subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions:
Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of
the project.
According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing
public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at
acceptable pressure.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLM N 3 I DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\sketch
The entire meadowland Business Park has an approved water allocation, which applies to this
proposed project.
1. The South Burlington Water Department should review the plans prior to preliminary plat
approval.
According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider
or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system
approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The
subdivision received a 30,345 gallon per day sewer allocation. This allocation is still in effect.
Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to
prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the
subject property and adjacent properties.
The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of
the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the
standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations.
2 The applicant should submit a grading and erosion control plan for the subject property, in
accordance with Section 16.04 of the Land Development Regulations, with the preliminary plat
application.
The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to
prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads.
Access to this property is proposed via two (2) access drives off of Meadowland Drive: a 30' wide
drive on the westerly side of the proposed building and a 24' wide drive on the easterly side of the
proposed building. Both of these access drives are proposed for ingress and egress. The two
proposed access drives are at least 400' apart, which is compliance with Section 15.12(E) of the
Land Development Regulations.
Pursuant to Section 15.12(E), the easterly access drive should be aligned with Bowdoin Street, on
the opposite side of Meadowland Drive.
3. The plans should be revised to show the easterly access drive on the property aligned with
Bowdoin Street, on the opposite side of Meadowland Drive, prior to preliminary plat submittal.
The proposed parking lots are very large to accommodate the large trucks this site will cater to.
Therefore, circulation on the site should not be an issue.
According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 61h Edition, 24,540 square feet of warehousing and
distribution will generate 12.52 P.M. peak -hour trip ends. However, the square footage of the office
portion of the building needs to be submitted to accurately calculate the traffic impacts of the
proposed project.
4. The square footage of the office portion of the building should be submitted with the preliminary
plat application to accurately calculate the traffic impacts of the proposed project.
No Text
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\sketch
The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams,
wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on
the site.
The subject property does not contain any identified wildlife habitat. However, the site does
contain a pond and some wetlands. The wetlands are delineated on the plans dated August 26,
2003, but they appear to be delineated by the Chiitenden County Regional Planning Commission.
The proposed building and parking area are outside of the associated 50' buffer, as shown on the
plans. However, the City's Wetland Map shows the wetland extending beyond the wetland
depicted on the plans. The plans should be revised to have a wetlands professional delineate the
wetlands on the property.
5. The plans should be revised to have a wetland professional delineate the wetlands on the
property, prior to preliminary plat submittal.
The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in
the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in
which it is located.
According to Section 6.04(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Industrial -Open Space
10 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light
industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and
Burlington International Airport. The l0 District regulations and standards are intended to allow
high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open character of the district,
minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and enhance the visual quality of
approaches to the City while providing suitable locations for employment and business growth.
The location and architectural design of buildings in a manner that preserves these qualities is
strongly encouraged.
Staff feels the proposed project is in compliance with the stated purpose of the 10 District, as
outlined in the Land Development Regulations.
Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities
for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas.
There are significant portions of open space running along the western, eastern, and southern
portions of the property, so staff feels this requirement is met.
The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to
ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided.
The Fire Chief will have to review the proposed project prior to preliminary plat approval.
6. The Fire Chief should review the proposed project prior to preliminary plat approval.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINt JN 5 ' DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\sketch
Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and
lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such
services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners.
The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the westerly side of the
proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian
and recreation traffic through the property.
7. Pursuant to Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant should submit a
landscape plan and landscape budget prepared by a landscape architect or professional
landscape designer, with the preliminary plat application.
8. The City Engineer should review the stormwater facilities and utilities plans, prior to preliminary
approval.
Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is
consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards.
The subdivision plans for the entire Meadowland Business Park show details on utilities, lighting,
and stormwater management. These have been approved by the City Engineer, so they are
acceptable for the proposed project.
9. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any new
electric, telephone, outdoor lighting, and cable distribution systems shall be underground.
The applicant submitted a lighting point by point plan for the proposed project, which staff feels
meets the requirements in Appendices A.9 and A.10 of the Land Development Regulations. In
addition, the applicant submitted exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the proposed lighting. The
proposed lighting fixtures are in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development
Regulations.
10. The plans should be revised to indicate the exact location and height of all proposed exterior
lighting, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat application.
The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the
affected district(s).
Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington
Comprehensive Plan.
SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS
Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations, any PUD shall require site
plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan
applications:
CITY OF SOUTH BURLW- JN 6 1 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\sketch
The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from
structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and
adequate parking areas.
11. The applicant should include architectural details of the proposed project with the preliminary
plat application.
Staff feels the site is planned to provide for adequate planting. However, a landscaping plan should
be included with the preliminary plat application.
The site includes a 20' wide pedestrian easement that will help facilitate pedestrian movement. In
addition, there is an existing recreation path running along Meadowland Drive. Therefore, staff
does not feel any additional sidewalks are necessary on the property.
According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(13) of the Land Development Regulations, 24,540 square
feet of building dedicated to warehousing, processing storage, and distribution requires a minimum
of 13 parking spaces. However, the square footage of the office portion of the building needs to be
submitted to accurately calculate the required parking for the proposed project. The plans show a
total of 80 parking spaces, 2 of which are handicapped. According to Table 13-7 of the Land
Development Regulations, a property with 76 to 100 parking spaces requires 4 handicapped -
accessible parking spaces.
12. The square footage of the office portion of the building should be submitted with the preliminary
plat application to accurately calculate the required parking for the proposed project.
13. The plans should be revised to depict a total of four (4) handicapped parking spaces, prior to
preliminary plat submittal.
The layout of the proposed parking areas meets the requirements in Table 13-8 of the Land
Development Regulations with regard to parking spaces dimensions. However, the aisle width
between the rows of parking spaces does not meet the 24' requirement outlined in Table 13-8 of
the Land Development Regulations.
14. The plans should be revised to show at least a 24' aisle width in the parking areas on the
northeast and northwest section of the property, prior to preliminary plat submittal.
Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees,
residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is proposed in the parking lot to the west of the
proposed building.
Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable.
Parking is proposed on the sides of the proposed building, thus this requirement is met.
Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and
scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings.
I i
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINv / ON 7 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\sketch
The scale of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site and existing buildings in the area.
The height of the proposed buildings is 24', which is under the 35' or 40' height maximum for the
City.
15. The applicant should submit an elevation plan that shows the height of the proposed building
from average pre -construction grade and indicates whether the building will have a flat roof or
pitched roof with the preliminary plat application.
As the proposed project is located in a business park in a area where industrial uses exists, staff
feels the scale of the proposed building is compatible with existing buildings in the area.
Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior
alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground.
Staff has already noted that the utility lines must be underground.
The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural
characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive
transitions between buildings of different architectural styles.
No information on architectural elements is provided.
16. The applicant should submit architectural details with the preliminary plat application.
Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to
existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed
structures.
Again, details of architectural elements need to be provided with the final plat plan.
In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the followi
specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations:
The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting
properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial
of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to
improve general access and circulation in the area.
The proposed project is nestled between the wetlands on the site. In order to provide any access
to adjacent properties, wetland encroachments would be necessary. Because the project is in a
large lot, industrial area, staff does not feel access to adjacent properties is necessary.
Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be
underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to
have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site.
I
CITY OF SOUTH BURLING , uN 8 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
WrMsuMand air express\,sketch
Staff has already indicated that utility lines must be underground.
All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any
recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with
opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s).
17. The plans should be revised to clearly depict the location and screening of any proposed
dumpster or other facilities to handle solid waste, prior to preliminary plat plan submittal.
Landscaping and Screening Requirements
Staff has already noted that the applicant should submit a landscape plan and landscape budget
pursuant to Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations.
Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area
with twenty (20) of more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking
area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. At least one (1) major deciduous
shade tree, whose caliper is equal to or greater than two and one-half (2.5) inches when
measures six (6) inches above ground at the time of planting, shall be provided within each
parking area for every three thousand (3,000) square feet of paved area or every ten (10)
parking spaces, whichever is greater.
18. The plans should be revised to show 10% of the internal parking area landscaped in
accordance to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, prior to preliminary plat
submittal.
Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be
specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off.
19. The plans should be revised to show the proposed location of snow storage areas in
accordance to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, prior to preliminary plat
submittal.
20. Pursuant to Section 13.06(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any
utility cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review
Board.
21. The City Arborist should review the plans prior to preliminary approval.
View Protection Zone
22. The preliminary plat application should include information on the height of the proposed
building in relation to mean sea level.
I
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINL , ON 9 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\sub\land air express\sketch
Other
The City Engineer has reviewed and approved the plans (comments attached). His comments
will be required on the revised plans prior to final plat approval.
Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments Section" of
this document and include the changes in the preliminary plat application.
Respectfully submitted,
Brian Robertson, Associate Planner
Copy to: Bill Spencer, applicant
CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS
LAND AIR EXPRESS HEADQUARETERS
Swift Street Extension — Meadowland Drive
11/10/03
1. Sketch plan prepared by Krebs & Lansing dated August 26, 2003 is acceptable.
No Text
CITY OF SOUTH BT-TIRLINGTON
DEPARTP.IMN7 OF PLAMINDI1G & ZOiTU'TG
575 DOR,SET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTOI , IiERVlONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (302) 846-4101
Permit
APPLICATION POR SUBDIVITSION SKETCH PLAN VIEW
All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested
information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected
and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide
pertinent information only.
1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #)
Summer Ice Joint Venture c/o Mark Neagley Neagley 4 Chase Construction
1 1 SO Airport Parkway Ro Burlington VT 05403—(p) 802 658 6330—(fax4 802 658034
?) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and. page #) Vol 387 Pages 439 - 441
3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and lax #) Land Ai r FxnrPcc of New England, —Lid.
4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST 11,T TIM PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) option
5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Bill Spencer same as #3 above
6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1150 Hinesburg Rd Lot 3 Meadowland Business Park
Smith Rurlinaton Varwont
7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office)— 0860-01150 Lo
8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use).
current vacant land
b) Proposed Uses ;on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to
remain) Corporate. Headquarters of Land Air Express of New England, Ltd.
c) Total building square footage on propert7.i (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain)
Proposed one story building of 24,540 sf total (see attached sketch plan prepared
by Krebs and Lansing)
1) Proposed height o oul ding (if applicable) Proposed building height 24 ft (see attached sketch
plan prepared by Krebs and Lansing)
e) i Tum er of resigentiai units (if applicable, ilvv units and existing units to remain)
NA
1'} Other (list any :other information pertinent to this application not spe'Mcally requested above, please
note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Proposed facility will include offices, cross -docking
facility and maintenance shop elements. Office use will occupy greater than 159o'
9) LOT COVERAGE
a) Euilding: Existing NA % Proposed 2.7 %
b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc)
Existing NA % Proposed 19. s °ib
c) Front yard {along each street) Existing NA % Proposed 8 %
? 0) TYPE OF =STII\TG OR PROPOSED EINTCUMBRAINTCES ON PROPERTY (easements.
covenants, leases, _rights of,uay, etc.) Existing 20 ft pedestrian easement and existing 200 ft
space buffer along south line. See attached subdivision piapiat SPI prepared by Trudell
Consulting Engg�ineers
11) PE.Ol'fED E TSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MU1,UCIPAL FACTLITIES
(sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) Proposed connection to municipal services and
--readway eur_�ent-iy in place on swift st Fxtension
12) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & l/iATLaTG ADDRESSES (this
may be provided on a separate attached she r
see attic P� Sheet
1.3) EST�VIATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATu Six months from obtaining all necessary permits
14) PLANS AND FEE
Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular
size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision
application fee is free.
SEP-17-2003 14:35 NEAGLEY&CHASE CONSTR
8026580349 P.02i02
be.ebv ccrtrfv that all the inicrmation requested as part of this application has been submitted and iS
accuate :o the best of my knowled e. -,
SIGNATLU& OF APPLICANT _
SIGNATURE OF PR X OWNER � ti
.Do not write below this line
DATE OF SUBI ESSICNI-
I have revie-wed this aketch plan application and find it to be:
Cvr�plete ❑ IncoMPI e
is ° 4
Dire., o of Tlannjng & Zoning or Designer ate
TOTAL P . 2.,
TOTAL P.02
09/17/03 WED 02:17 [TX/RX NO 76021 Z 002
.�:.T= PLAN
The 'LHcwin2 information must be shown on the Mans. -'lease submit five (5) copies and one reducwd
copy (11 " , 17") of the plan. Failure to provide -the foilowina information _kill result in Tour application
being rejected and a delay in the rejiiew before the Develoument Review Board. If submitting a plat
amendment, please submit only pertinent inforination. Pease provide {on separate sheet) a list of ail
abutters to the project property and mailing addresses.
o Name and address of owner of record and applicant.
o Name of owners of record of contiguous properties.
Numerical and graphical scale, date last revised, and north arrow.
D Location snap showing relation of proposed subdivision -to adjacent property and surrounding
area.
o Boundaries and area of ail contibaous ;and belonging to the owner of record.
Boundaries and area of the proposed subdivision.
E:,isting and proposed layout of property lines.
Type and location of e<.isting and proposed restrictions on land (easements, covenants, etc.).
Location, laineS ,mid 7Nidths <,3- eiSting 13d proposed 3 set5 or orivate ways.
E isting zoning boundaries. [� 9
',i xisLing watercourses, ivetiands, floodplains, '•akof�oie'�ed areas, ledge 'outcrovsi, and other nataral
features.
* Location and size of any e,nsting seviers (ix"�ci1lding septic tanks) and _voter rilaflnS, culverts and
drains on the property to be subdivided.
o Number and location of parking spaces (see Section 26.25 of the Zoning Regulations).
o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard.
o A list of --,vaivers desired (if any).
o all applicable information required for a site plan application shall be submitted for subdivisions
involving a cornmercial or industrial complex, muit-i-fannily project, planned unit development,
or planned residential development (please see site plan application).
Permit Number
APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either
on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the
Development Review Board.
I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also
that hearings are held twice a month . That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the
hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing.
Type of application check one:
( ) Appeal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation)
**Request for a conditional use
( ) Request for a variance
( ) Other
PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY)
WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING?
1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #)
Summer Ice Joint Venture c/o Mark Neagley, Neagley and Chase Construction 1150
Airport Pkwy South Burlington, VT 05403 802-658-6320 fax 802-658-0349
2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) vol. 387 page 439-441
3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Land- Air Express of New England, Ltd.
c/o Bill Spencer 115 Covington Lane. Shelburne. VT 05482 802-863-5062 x 219
fax 802-863-8062
4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Bill Spencer same as above.
5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1150 Hinesburg Rd, Lot #30 Meadowlands Business Park,
South Burlington. Vermont 05403
6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0860-01150 Lot #3
7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) currently -open, vacant land
b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain)
Corporate Headquarters for Land Air Express of New England, Ltd. _
c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain)
Pronged building of 24, 540 s £ total
d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement
and mezzanine) Proposed building is one story with a height of 24 ft.
(see attached plan prepared by Krebs and Lansing)
e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain)
NA
f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees)
Total of 50 employees: 30 office / 20 non -office
g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above,
please note if Overlay Districts are applicable):
8) LOT COVERAGE
a) Building: Existing NA % Proposed 2, 7 %
b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc)
Existing NA % Proposed 19.8
c) Front yard (along each street) Existing NA % Proposed 8 %
(does not apply to residential uses)
9) COST ESTIMATES
a) Building (including interior renovations): $ 1,000,000.00
b) Landscaping: $ 30,000.00
c) Other site improvements (please list with cost):
10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC
a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out):
b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out):
290 Total (see traffic study attached)*
c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 20: 7 entering, 13 exiting..
11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION:
PM
12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday - Friday regular business days
13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 6 months from obtaining permits
14) LIST ABUTTERS ( List names and addresses of all abutting property owners on a separate sheet
of paper).
3
Application For The Development Review Board
Request for a conditional use
Applicant: Land Air Express of New England, Ltd.
Item 14)
List of property owners abutting Lot #3 Meadowlands Business Park, 1150 Hinesburg Rd.
South Burlington obtained from City of South Burlington Assessors Office 09/04/03:
To the south: Dubois, Homer and Marie
1405 Hinesburg Rd
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
To the east: Green Acres Inc
PO Box 2123
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
To the west: Summer Ice Joint Venture
And northwest c/o Mark Neagley
And north Neagley Chase Construction
(Lots 2, 7, 10, 12) 1150 Airport Parkway
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
To the north: Thomas Chase
c/o Neagley, Chase Construction
1150 Airport Prkwy
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
EXHIBIT A
PLAN
The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced
copy (1 I" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application
being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. If submitting a final
plat amendment, please submit only pertinent information. Please provide (on separate sheet) a list of
all abutters to the project property and mailing addresses.
oI"Complete survey of property by a licensed land surveyor drawn to scale (20 ft. is preferred).
o,**" Name, license number, seal, and contact number of licensed land surveyor & date prepared.
of Survey data (acreage, property lines, zoning boundaries, watercourse, base flood elevation, etc.)
Location of easements, public lands, r.o.w.s, sidewalks, and public or private street (w/names)
a,"' Five foot contours (existing and finished)
Location and size of any existing sewers (including septic tanks) and water mains, culverts and
drains on the property to be subdivided.
o"'Location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts,
paths, easements, parks, and other public opens spaces.
ei Numerical and graphical scale, date last revised, and north arrow.
;/Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative water supply.
V" Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate
provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes.
QZDetails of storm water facilities in the form of a drainage plan.
o Details of all proposed bridges or culverts.
o Location of temporary markers.
&' All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and associated conditions.
o A list of waivers desired (if any).
o Development timetable (including number of phases and start and completion dates).
60t A report addressing planned residential/unit development criteria of the Zoning Regulations.
o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size).
car" Location of abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping
ar- Number and location of parking spaces ( see Section 26.25 of the Zoning Regulations)
sr,' Number and location of handicapped spaces (see Section 26.253(a) of the Zoning Regulations)
Qe Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard
G/Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be downcasting and shielded.
o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened)
o/ Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations
'If restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for
patron use but not containing fixed seats
APPLICATION FEE
Fee $85.00*
* Includes $10.00 recording fee
5
SEP-08-2003 13:39 NEAGLEY&CHASE CONSTR
8026580349 P.02i02
I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is
accurate to the best of my knowledge.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
SIGNATURE UP PROPFjMJOWNER
Do not write below this line
DATE OF SUBMISSION:
REVIEW ALJTHORITY_ 0 Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zonino
I have reviewed this site Plan application and find it to be:
Complete ❑ Incomplete
Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee
4
Date
TnTQI P Gt7
TOTAL P.02
09/08/03 HON 01:21 [TX/RX NO 73141 Z 002
�tr-ems-ebb 5 12: 02
NEAGLEY&CHASE CONSTR
8026580349 P.02i02
MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK
Permits � _
✓ Act 250 Permit #4C1005 -
✓ City of South Burlington Subdivision Approval (1996)
✓ Conditional Use Permit #EJ96-0381
✓ State Subdivision Permit EC-4-2004
✓ Public Water System Permit #E-0629
✓ Stormwater Discharge Permit #1269
0
✓ Amended Air Pollution Control Permit #AP-90-052C (replaces #AP-90-052B)
✓ Army Corps of Engineers Permit #200102616 (replaces #199603166)
✓ Permit 1272
✓ Archaeology Letter from Emily Wadhams, State of Vermont
TOTAL P.02
09/07/03 SUN 23:45 (TX/RX NO 73051 1a002
Notes:
1. 7hls Ls not a bg dwy su }r p pMy /Mm hasp ore frwn a pMn enbt/ed
Af dow/onds Ptak -by OW Eng.—g As ktes.
2 Abufth g ppgrty Ih,- me lrrvn 01, of South BurtMgton 7px Mgas (M
digital lion).
.i Oigfto/ —la photography and —t— data — *_ v ant MoppMg
prow= photography data fnm Spring, 1999
Location_ Man_
Owner Information:
SLmmx Ice ✓olnt Ventura
82 Church Street
8urlinglon, VT o5401, (807)-"-8142
Applicant Information:
Zaniog;_
IndustnW and Open Space Zoning Vbiriit
fiend
-- LU
.- . ApproxanaN H'operfy LMa
ftfts
W
U
W
0' 40' 80' 160, 140' 310' 400'
Bar Scale 1" = 80,
.aneed ae:a �ar`r. ._ IC
in Sketch Plan
n JAR
1.
= 80'--- Meadow/ands Park
August 16. 1003
,o' ct OYJJ? Swift Street Extmslm-Hihesburg RO South Rur1/rrgta, Vermont
A"' PS & I.rih'SINC Consulting .61normeers, lnc. . .
16-K Alain Slree4 t olchester, lrermosat AWS
Notes:
M., h not a bound y sur X Prgoady Ih,. shorn are rrwn a p/ -&4d
M-d-I de Pork -by aW En0earer9 Aesocmtex
Abut"" property Ih,- are from CRY or 5 th Bathrgton lax M ps (h
di9Rd roan)
ftfiat -W photography and contour dot. ore warn V art MppIg
P ogram. Photography dotes ham ,$ring, 199.9
- ----- it
Location_ Map__
Owner_ Information:
Summer /ce JOIN Venture
82 Church Street
8un1ngton4 VJ o54o1, (802)-658-8142
Applicant lnformotion._
Slimmer /ce ✓olnt Venture
82 Church Street
Burlington, Vr 05401, (802)-658-8142
Zany
lndustr/a/ and Open Space Zon/ng O/strict
Areas•
Buildable Area = 4.27 acres
Total area of Lot 3 - 20.2 acres
_Prgoosed Lot,Coygr�e__
New Buildings 24,540 s, f. 14,541 ,a = 2 7$
81,1112 ,r
New Porkmg dRoods -� ors ales ,r. ' 771X
Totes/ L'ororage n1RsiY nt -- 19.8$
fiend
- Approxrmote Property Lk,.
0' 40. 80• 160, 240' .J20' 400'
Bar Scale t = Bo
Dote rewsed
jChecked oats
Design /AJ _
Drawn JAR_
Sketch Pior)
Checked -- ----
Corporate Headquarters
Scale I- � 80_
Date A_TH LC M4
Land Air
Project OJ>32
Sw/ft Street Extens/on-Hinesburg RO South Burlington, Vermont
ARAWS & L4YVFI1V6! Consulting Rngineers,
le4t Aain Street, Colchester, Vermont
...............................
-r
sw
Mognolk' Ndfn
iN•d vales oB /he illuminance
o�\ provided by tha new lighting, in /
* \ font -candles, as calculated by
1 \ ALADAN, a G'E Lighting /
\ Appl/cation Design and Analysis 1
-_... Muddy Brook
�I rvvls 1vw
cwwa �,�...
�».w. r � h./..L,f\.J. A.I�.l�l+l I 'I
II 1
0.49
n' I
' �le•c I I II 1
0.49 1
II
aa^ as aa'a If l 111
a aaawaa II I 1
II I
D a ♦` a s I1 I 1
1 II 1
al � , m atgP I I I
_ II
O-61 1 I Ily�l 1
Existing IS' bike-' I I
�. FT a I Pnlh easement (� I
vv ai u v a .. � Boxed w/ues ur'e the nDerage ) I I
a AA-,J
Y1 J ' v _ _ a• w - the !/w rinoted aneo. Aanroga
rl i 1 a%b'Y✓ °o/( a" a a� °' 'at 7! - '71mmfnotion feref for lighted area
9.F tea• @ Iv ae is D,6 foot-candle..
5 f
r fo
/ a W 4 a a. a'W a• e, _ s/c� III II / of I I I
1N
. ae � J �l• 1 I f / / / /
Existing 15'bike
/
path easement /
r '/ mxe ui 1
15� �teomu
/' �'°*,*\� �i 1 ,l /// it �/•� ' �\,cm�l �
S LN,l
�. .:. w•'� � � '' ,.� ...• � Mudd -
to '
130
Le end
1 r*F A fW Nbeghfn250 ClL ff Lu hi,&e, 100- H meld
hrM'de, We# mmmred el IS:
/ J / 7YFE'tl 0' Nbughtm zw aVf Lamawwq 75-m tt meta
hd/do, wolf mounted of 12:
ME c 6r S7'M-175 Lu hmk cutoff aplkx w/M 75-waft
a_— 20 �- _ _ _ �• —_— __ 120--_�len_____1Lla
BCC SCC/e
meld MIA* Pde-mounted at fe:
V
* N. 7200
c
�OISTF.N�'a \2�
sp�� EN�e
FOR PERMIT REVIEW
WALLIGNTER296CUMFFL4111 A1RE � vaoDucr
Ouildimp l y.,dlate. edeno-encad, welkwdy
Veidenlinl yeta, lAing tl°nNa anmany
d
mhflr wAll muunled Alm Ilghbep Applications.
I1115711iemdSLUTASLElORWETLOCATIONS
CSACmtih,d
IbreeDieee din can elmmmnm Aouxinp PmwmeA
Inviee•Momw Al rkM F IiMfh
EntIDDM.gukared. wAh - a d I
r.n.eme erdFm evl b I
saae.teenda y Flmn A Mhmw
lb I dA.p, A Uencea Aieewimbed F
meetAaFmDe
rrenbtttlem beOeAt cemyanena wane Im1e1Fe
MDglll ee medium beu 1•mpe
TYPES A & 8
SPM-175 LUMINAIRE
mr„xenw,rn walEw,�s Parl rg arnea - _ I
weM II. w+1lrpMine w+M Mr r, - - M1. •�
wall muu A - elan - -
SPMM wnk Met tllea
• N115721nee SUnaflrE lUx WET I0C0.I�ONS I i
• C.G Graeae
•Arerd eomxwebnel
• E u d end ceeiwed "
•N• ndw a tr•eluentdnrp»•d lle Vnes r-'
Fm Feraeerel I
•INeuSnTnADarynwAonamarnryeaD»n.rc
El. deponae
• Nimweury eF-can emmr ran nroi �q
•!».apm».x Fpn rN egdlanwr.. °,a.r weE -.
•IlN one aeyv Aeea epeAn lnD lea yl . WxAI 1wMMeeep
un GDra.,esemwmwroi eEa em enlwn 1M.IRTnmlde°o lam
•s'r�DDxe •..wnnFe wrm madam bn»l.mD I � .
me •exam e°�:m
TYPE C
May d 2001 added owrogs foot-cand'e neM
IMte nN.+ed Oasriat/nn
Cheaeed
A - els 71'
\ L w 218.01'
' -5880, ,
EXISTING 30' WIDE
DRIVE EASEMENT- \
AND 10' SNOW
STORAGE EASEMENTS
MATCH WTO
EVS77NG
EASEMENT LOCATIO
(BOIN SIDES) AND
/- /` m 14 34,34,
10' EIEC. EASEMENT
i R 789.78'
FOR SIGN U6T4TIN0
L w 200.92'
TIE --�
z •\
..D-
11 ETEI ICAI tI
\
EASEMENT ro SYWI
R w 412.18'
\a
L w 50.08'
_ _...., DETAIL
yy
N O A
405.87'
I.1", 83'0TJ2'W CJ ..\ Yx
zI �'
C 20' SEWER EASEMENT,
M VOL 203 P. 472 -.--!
NO3ti2'JB"E
587.03'
C1 NEseu73e_
_UbE DATA
CURVE DATA �g$EM�NTSHART
BOWDOIN LANE 60' R- W
I
2.). 19
355..i
J44 fit
'T
17
77
7500
JOG Of
136.3E
5N5]V
]
J3719
286.151
.1777t
5727TY)J9H4'5S1"17I i
!f
540.15
337.04
JJ} 67'
'65 19 99
S
5a1
.4
11224
112.04
SU909'JI FW.
!97'J1/1!"
08"
460.15
141.SD'
140.94
55W155-If
GI
,10'01'16"
460 IS
241424'
.38.48
38010.5'J3E
AI L-9165' [I N 0'56"A"W
A7 ARC�II977' •)S.n1Y
A.7 PkCW 51 (id' R. 75,00
AI ARf,+if9.71' R.�75.OrY 7
A5 IS91.6!, B-• MAT7'U6"E
A6 L^IAJ 29 R_ N1M-to Ww
APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SOUT71 BURLINGTON, VT. ON THE - DAY OF .-. 198`-, t\\
SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS Of SAID RESOLUTION.
SIGNED INIS __ DAY OF ___ 799- A
BY CHAIRMAN OR CLERK \ G
SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. \
'VnfttA 7E � RECEIVED FOR RECORD
19 ._-_..
�n Ot ._._-._._ O'clock mkrutae m PROJECT LOCATION -
If recorded M VCWme_____ Page _
< Atteret: _._.C", Clerk
ion r`.
I
A'I-• - hIROUC.H LOT 6, 1 II
PROPOSED 5 1SE
1__... PTO 97RIAN EASEMENT
TO 9F. COMBINED WITH
7L7LISTINC EASEMENT ,i ..'�.' `'•9+._..•'"""u
I---EXISTING 15' WIDE Q71-DE-SAC PETAII
PEDES71,1IAN AlEASEMENT
Viol, 176 P. 510 rz P1mnA ru -IR r. w LAeeue rs KL W. L5Fu n11 ran
VOL. 211 P. 170 QUARRY rr smcr 1
IW nr ON I X, U{.-ILD 11l nM Nr Ad
Klan n S Mf t L. JDINl N IIMf KR. AR AO[ )a
OF rnt d atWWII, Ou I`D4 AND R(CMAS AHD 0.1 IOU
ill rN A. op 5 1. RF6
•+�'r"` _ 1 nk5 nN rL R sfn M A rn IAL STAW 1MR[L4 r 4RSt
;AUENCF I(XM A IN fI U) AND IN LYINAl10N AR RACno fRw
J.29 Ac. 1O Nt 1 Sw -LNGON 1-0 R(COI[D .
J.88
553.42' 1 m u RC o ru ON Nf A:RM( f rx)DRnMnn vsieN on
OB 50 l m 31s » 1yJ sID I_$ Au 1- 2s. m mw Al w TM A, Xrsr anl•.
N 8302 EY
p N AI FM'I NAS MIN aX T0 rn1N1L`R (aLNX fC iASENtN
'b 1$ O J.OB Ae. N N Ik n .1PrWUII,I rA-n NDnnA. oANr MWS AUn-AIKn nk
t100 N1 �� S 0230'E '� _,$ 3H• c` 1 fNCW u IN4 v r r AW NJ ". ON s P Al
ROAD VARTNERSFRP -' F, lfy N83 (8 )J90 Ac. n, 556•
i VOL 271, P. 3e2 HINESBURG ROAD 711.56 Jg" E I^ rrWE Rl ar =rso c ]oN. s SIInRrI n rlveu anew nurNaRw
,NORTH SCENIC NEW �' i orkre"a fA .- N 83'02' N Q B� PROWDlo u rrR UI nnkr (w lr ram( NCR AMY
.p n ra uMNN '^ S 83•02J8 'W » M (RN rav f M rr sr; (n wmACNr (v INC
Cp L6 LB PROIF.ChON ZONE- INN 1` q. 3.I3 Ac. 5 N
el IN -L7 u �O y, rt 3,9H AC- b' �U O SU W NA M(a Y n INl' qr Kf AN L I R A oNr IACII CIAN(RR
16 AMA w 1 dL -� '60.OD' 1 IM)N PRY 4 C t r W A 10 l ' w IJG WlWkll NLADS.
716.5, • R UE L C rM W INf SM1 u( a -11 NWM4 L
t4i1 216.00• / C.22 Ao. I'S .L N 84.5;S'19 :�"' S H4r�J-- i9' W t ACRES INS_ ^1RFr el fl[NlF ioN IM'15.
i 83.49' W ^L A�A1 BO O1' r
d k S. -../ „ / EXTENSION 13 1.31 Vol. 9Q P. I2a , INL ft rl$ Ur- Ar' IOR S I1 SMCEI FYR 5)IrN rI MAT': ON
80' MIX ROAD '- 0. 0' NVL. 213. P. me amft ANr ( M I AR( r C NW r(n m nIE cln n'
j"„ _ _ N84'SJ'19"E '' ufnnIII nriwm 1111, nil" sr -DD car w mL suenWurD
VOL 91, P.49 I 1 .00' _ --' '- R.O.W. TO BE,CONVEVED TO C+ L15 1
i N83'49' E CITY DF SO. BURLWO1t7N I CS y
1 AREA : 5.Of ACRES 30, Wes.__, X IN. N1N _10D 1n^..I RE+rlcrau Au lots IS
II - In -IONO IOIIMl0. aw NE HkxN1cl
200 OPEN O or ouu fi nNrs nr mslnncr FNw k' c sr :atr rrXx n
SPACE DUFFER 1 ti DRAINAGE ` POND '0'1 rn rrw r n I A rn N[rcR1 rs nlunno, G•
- - _ 20.20 Ac.
EASEMENT A� i r1 1
4 ROO .---- --..« U '-ZOO' OPEN NM f1- I((.' -.I sl Of aNYt I, - oRM:.'!,u
RIGHT-OF-WAY 49.50 AC. O 1 _.-_. _ ��- PEDE20' MOE STR AN L�'ACC BUFFER._ io sao AaiW.i.4.a! S. 5rim iirrArlrx �c �N.n
(66.0') •J� f00' WIDE 2O' WIDE ' 8.00 Ac. I /
oS" i CONSERVATION ZONE 20' WI DE •h EASEMENTS--
Ll'! EASEMENT-. 1y 200' CONSERVATION¢
�} h ZONE AND
DRAINAGECLNQ
Q I i 20' PEDESTRIAN �. dD EASEMENT /� "
cc 4401J'_ I _!'ALGLkA rtO MYNI' (SFf' M. rAll)
EASEMENT a .- - ;R.�•�' f0 2. • uIw Pu rXnvu
" r. _-
--s63"Ia9s w � s62•a3'1e"
I1 _ _
11 I j .. 6 W a 'r fr )
J 4 7
g' 9 YT_--
563'1_ 4 � U - uXXv wc !ro nr ..[ D
_..-_ _ CFDAR 1REE ! - I' !fwcafrc NI Nf Ir (nxu+ry
UO •
I - too' CIX45ERVA TION ZONE 70' PEDESTRIAN rn+I:Rta NDNuw r (rn IX Vr)
-I-.. t P. T k N. -_ 30' WIDE SEWER E EASEMENT -._--
l1 lA•I DAM !RAPE RI fFRI, N!T
.. ... _- .. - DANS DRAINAGE EASEMENT CON J OWNER, SUMMER
C'S CLA9K DAM CNAN1 wxtNrN
" P VOL215 S. Al R. E
i 1. P' '� L. A G ...._... PENNING 209 ON � `711ER pF NRPOR7 APPROCN MMER ICE JOINT VENTURE . A . -
"W BBe11NdRQ SOU LY ED(E
- FXIsiRm rMLC IM(
OL I
NU:SYJ 2p V!
JMq. p�O'tl
L7
NSJ'Ul'J6'E
1467'
L1
,,. 057'W
100.00
L4
S8JT!136"W
19.f2
18
fN.}'JP 16 F
20.00
16
N62'2059 L
194.1/
17
N0774 J4"W
12,00
I.A
N8J'04 4G"E
747.00
19
507V425-F
110
ti13'1909�W
1.17
S83'272"W
112
'.0,5'16 IJ L
L 1.3
S84',5J'19-W
1.14
50;i 58.17"F
P67,65
1.15
7184v3-19 C
116
::AA';�.f'19-W
117
S8J19 M•W
ItA
N8JVI IG"C
L 19
84 J 19 W
L20
NF01607'F
65
ITt
!; r0 9701
87.65
1.7I
N8J U2 JB"E
r(ISlI
N/I'
-BUffi1d1(jON PROPFRDES
LIMITED PARTNJ,BjLJj�
VOL 273. P. M
PLAT MIL JK P. 5
Il
PROPOSED RELOCATION OF 50'
EASEMENT TO LANE PRESS
REFER TO VOL. 219, P. 102
Ir
--- 80' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY
CONVEYED TO THE CITY
Q
OF SOUTH BUR1.INGTOM
VOL. 384 P. 104
l A
60' WIDE ROAD ._._.�\
R.O.W. TO BE CONVFYFD TO
CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON
AREA : 0.98 ACRES
1 \L4
L2
-L22 N83*236"F.
�j89.07' -
ML -
4
589. 7'
t
�2
s
P I J.12 Ac. P
4.47 Ae. TAP
400 DO'
60'X100' EXISTING
PUMP STATION PARCEL
VOL 176 P. 510
- VOL 211 P. 187
1.5
20' WIDE SEWER
EASCMENT TO EXIS77NG
PUMP STATION
•
VOL 170 P. 510
211 P. 107
!I�
' EA-aEAIETIT fdf aA-oE-SAC
j
ORCLFIrTO
TO BE EO BACK T(} LOTS tl
AND 0 O LON
Af4O B eNFN 4A LONGER OLIL-017 SEF
AND 'CUL-OE-S4C OEM
2ASSVCF
�
ffAP SPECFIC OlNEN9dlA
own
GO' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY
TO BE G.,"YFD TO THE
CITY OF SOUTFI SURLINGTON
AREA : 1.01 ACRES----�
!h
50' WOE
DRAINAGE -T /
EASEMENT
�L.
I I -•
If VOL 211
414,77•
0I5
N MUTANT _.R._PJ.QO� M. R K. A 2ex
Prolxt title
VOL. JR7 P. ' VOL.112
P. VOL 60 P. 131 P. I4 - J
P. 070
VCL. 179, P. 126
PLAT 1OL_ 107. P. 42
\\\ }N111Nn1Ik194nrYy1
Vf •
4,
MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK
20' PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT
R�OF
Hinesburg Road So. Buriln ton, Vt.
LEDG
I LDcanoN TO CENTER ON -F...tS11Lt11 DEVELOPEMENT
y D .t.
3
RECRF,ADON PATH ALONG
TAYLOP
.THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY
Sill division Mat.
Qaphk Scale
/J
FCo1
(!� XOIIUINC/I'UNr RCNSIrXJc A/7 )/95 SLN
`�
a'atAMakl^�
7r TRUDELL CC)N-AULTING
-
-300 0 300 600 9p0 1200
ReWbnA �- I Date By
ENGINEERS, INC.
a olAlr 1,1N ron4 eo, .rw wmr,)^n, vermnm 111495 879-ant
Rr0k9t number 5a8022-40 Lxt __00
A01eet RMr. RPT DrevmT _
f1e1d L1eek I051i 52. Obk 1091
TRUDELL
CONSULTING ,
ENGINEERS, INC.
14 Nair Park Rood
Bex.308 WIIBstOn, Vt.,.. 05405. '(802) 879-Ei
Ll.l
_o
0
N
Z
�
LU
T/J „
co
C)
U
bate B
Revisions
PVMVNRI:-a ro opar .,. f1+.
5E or VER
NPv P, 9\M,O,LJ . .,
,'�1• Bq s�1 `R'
1OWL E,
Protect title
MEADOWLAND
BUSINESS PARK
Hinesburg Road
So. Burlington, Vt.
Sheet title
Subdivision Plat
1'ro;ect number _..._�u2�-I4 ..
Approved< .1✓s�f� '...
TRUDELL
CONSULTING
ENGINEERS, ii°Ir
14 Plhlr Park Road
Rnx 308 Wtlllston, Yt 05495. (nW) 879.8,
PRP SrAr1Wl
PARCfI
Ott —
CONSERVATION Rc
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
a CONSERVATION
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT I •Y/" "L i \'i.S�q
I!M�MMfR Project Location
NIT
NIT QQL?U Nli 11>N Y..3Q+:OKUFS_. I �!/ If.
_..1.iM1.10-WitkRiKL_ A
�y�' yT,y
L?91!'!LF/1.Y)1.F,5 t _ r !/: ® ca V�1 P `��' �`\/`e �rf,%%/������•`='�...
^6so o O T 46.6 AC.
r � O I T 1 �-
INDU-TRIAL AND OPEN
SPACE DISTRICT
Up 7
/
SOUTH
FAS7
UADRANT yA
'• S/ 1. ' S7R ^roW' !it I �'`� \Pt pa\ n'
wno[ w w
I—CP 4�VlP\—rufeNeAwNm-CmGS.-_�..—_a
Date
ICT wIFT PevhlonapISTR N/Fn.....-
as9a
��wu.i5ruwleitA
CONsr RVATION AND - '`�f' / b„ / 1 '`. ; ,..... \ ~} ~ CJ
OPEN SPACE O]ANO - ` `.l'".',r"�•�. '' F`", x
/ , r lot, !/ AC ICT T rx �
N SION / SaJTH BURLINGTON
r / >' 1
r.�,
y4 .
/ �., P s. ._....-......._ TOWN LINE:
`\ WILLI
NdI6 1 — I QUADRANT
yV �' sOUTHEAST �� - ;m ye"
N/r
RN/F DISTRICT FI 00n
_ ILTANJ. NIT
LiG/l>dA@C, I LOLf or AtRra+r nrPBgCn.sAI'L --" -
l -
1,-
11
N'F 1 INDUSTRIAL
E CONSERVATION
EN SPACE DISTRICT Prn�t title / �`xj /t y�
i " •lit 1 , ` 190 EACH 5(nE OP CENIERLfNE (!F pR00N�' ADV .a 6ril NAJ'
x
soUTHEAST BUSINESS PARK
QUADRANT
1 DISTRIC
Hinesburg a �,tt
LEGEND nRoa
d
.oad
SO. Burlington, 'Vt.
�cecs�E ea�an�ecal�w.nrc�A�EAS � ' ,�
I... SUMMER ICE JOINT VF.NIURE y
-----' ",Illy / I.OI LINE D 8.1 ACRES — -- � � - 82 CHURCHSTREr:T
BURLINGTON,- VT, 05401 sit ryge
TUNING UIS rRICr g(HINOARY I_J ;�
23,2 ACRES
N E riMaster ,
WEII.ANOS (NW!) 4 I6.7 ACRES ..
• N/r " - N`') HEA IN
IN INAREA DUSTRIAL k �j
Site Plan
IJ 26.4 ACRES .TLftHEHl.. 1 OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 1167. ACRES k V
i — --,J — _--- ORIME AGRICUL1URAL AREA 84.5 ACRF$
... N/F
,�
%// CONSERVATION LONE
Prolect manafter _ _ al r ___ Drawn s�,N
v4n, Date _�_ eji,/as=..-�- Scale
Graphle Scale
- .. APprov®d'-,..y��bf�TtwL.•�:%� -n
— - reef ,
' 900 0 300�' 600 SEOD 1200 ,,�.�.r'_....✓ .. E�•.� '�+y�
S p L
N
,``D !
I �\ CON x;1L
I .
' . , f ,. � -_`}` '�'y.; '• 1 ':.. "; rcs. 4 PI<It Pert R 's I �
,':. I "�,r.`- ..• ' . ,No-r''"t`..` .";,.,i 1 >.tR �•. M t Vt: 09A4: !Lq 1 Rr ! ��. r
LANE F'REss ; �j '' . • :.-_.,,,� � = �-'�'-,,�..�`�r �V v�,,,.,;�r'•t�,�� ,
Iy sw4+r Y 5 rffrer rx lira watt j w
fV
IAr 6 oN.4 A . �✓` t . 1' .,\ `. 1 1
rl \
z' %W wow
�iJ 1�' aaf%Nu tAg-wvvr
W w64 RR;ftl-X -"Y
I \ r
ON Lots s wt s,
;,.; � ' .. _..._.PaMotED :praw N;tnr- �A?erFNr •--,:M±- I -1�;-
ti ?x r 1. .S 5D' rnuc 1 •f d .fir I !I _
':
•
\ a1 nor a i f
\ 1
I :
I, HO NeGF -. _ ...
• � I _....:.:.......k ': ;' u e .\ ,, Pv:i9 i �•__ - __' 1 %/''✓� 6'As.
10
�I
J
4
.,,) 1 Ci
Lk. 1 f QP.:Q RCN.
` rr
ZOOM,: WET
r��r+c+w,rd—(W.9rii
liv
9frDA F•:1 E / 1
FOR Lotr / AN \ \
1 ). rA•c em+a/, //r asfL,ie�r+iN"
Cr1N8FAVp II N 'NO {7p1}+d.
r r •..•ar'r "
r"" fi sPAr,{ b,smY�f r�EYLnYrEe oN +
PptmaSFA CNANNF! ✓ 1 "'.1 / r _— y ) 1 \r� \
t
ly ,.
,
,/ q, ,1', h
i.
,yy .
,. : , r,!�. :,r,•_r,.� Y. !:,,z.,,r >.v^r ,x ... . .,.;. ..� , , ;. .. .. ,✓` i( .. , .,! ' , .: <.. ... .+.. r' 1 p p '::I'1 L1 CAVIL , ,
,.' : ry. .r >r•:'�r�' ..�! ::: �" w'rv. .., ,. .,�. ,. ., f.ur. ,. '. ,. ., w : .:: :: :. .i/' ...�f7 fi:L#3'�H�� qg py p,7
y . y� _,:"'" .. . �.._ ,.n.: W a +{ a5 °fi orA9virR► B BUSINESS >
N' 9 CLd �r r A ML NGYON. i,r ns+,l pg
�o NJr PEht+ldSi ' aw. Nvnnav ANo ofin
v r Semler ,*G [ACN .QM
n����OPfx•SpAtti Df q'N ifiTIArC ai$MMIC '! '} 7.:.T,7 y y
h _ dalorYw v4 1DD' eIVC' - PMWIND fiNl�JOtlr ':.: - _
t _ :, N,' r4 • •. ':..,. . N f 0,w A8[ LASEMFNi .-..rirPCAU „-.._
r6u�.i �
fDr.F A` MIMpl N OAyH tGvC '
: .-..u•- ..«�... _..._ __,.. :.._ fir-- �.. � .�....: --_ 3 *^� r
t
Rer�P Fc SP3A MW r q}l\f ,�jt t ilS* 1') ! Y
N'FTi AN7 #:ELPtfd'+'YION , 'J• F�yr� r� �i t'? f
}�+� "°` NiIYC:r • � ...'.+'�^"L"'"' f I�.. .1 . � r
:44/
CiFr',$CBtittpfPAHY+k�' I.M.}PROFYt1T0 M
Wirefm64Y S_ • t(1�S1 kC: � Yra ., hurrah••,
P���s � �L, REChEhiK7M•!'A1N5 WiLI..NGNr DE OON TP('C7EU • CAr2n M3N ' � I�
HtTh'Rl:NE�657Plp1�.'&.pSEME.NTg�AY THE f)EuttUP�G+t -: ..n.........
exret,Y'r'oA ?F+E:brcvSor W& W`lTmw IWsvo!r
14/
1Nn l r•m:EY ET1FNSION'AiQH%6r'-1.wh. NA'i(r1:M.tlar _
1
PLANNIN?3 hl4 TA
. YOrAI AREA : 116j7 AOWS
411
.. .... _ - Fc,�t. jDrN5+FY ALLD i1 tyN1YRVAVpr aN{Y^rgspr sPRCr /Asmz.!
�D : H noes i. L.or
., .....�.:. ... .....:.1 MIN. 3 AgPE LOY
. Ln0 O Ap ' n00 60c5:80O _ _ Nua.96R OP YpiE .ALLOYll'p : - 1�.H LOr;. - .,�
NM7PEP. OF LOPS PPOPCISW :: .11 C079
t r
ti
/ F
,r
1(
. YI' \ � t vPR p+n47ynl+r'MT YPbb?, ut6 IW, Il9 INX (iaP
1,4
« j
Igx,au's�an rLtapc;� r n. 1v» nu a;, r ,u r i rlwr tr+rn a' r,�rs {.., :...
nrwF �er°er 1 n Iu e ticnkrtAk+tg?raai� to nhati Ipr Y.:rtJte.Cx r?tF1
.-»• _...� f 11 � `\4 � a fYYOi� M+fL^��r$Yrf SrwYtiAr�.V,d r �
c A65 t INMO
S / - IrN71 b{TV @gjlr� A Irljll G:
ji
~ � 099 3.f...
I Jrx Sr 11� �. � �3AMta""j1N7 qpr� ��a� - vaT it G<rr i��t,
It
1 \\ cGT�pC,tiCR gorl�rr LL`E ISM r l�:`
litr �nr' a tra n wta e%kn g
/> 107 �r
ht�
`, _ _...�„„� ....,,,,! .. j ✓r S` rodrtt�7>rMPAL'�afc >�
r
--FVrSI IAM Ill W ll— —1Ci
T I,Vpylel[n MR �ry &r�P$ pp
YNZ;l,Nd'l" nww+�''!'t'All'I
�
_W �..:✓ ;,... ,� .o-.rry,p : � i fo aul�,cb-n ._ � _ . , i
.......;✓ • ....,..---�-� ^""`"'"_.""' ;` BU92JNi.rNr tk +rrm n r tnr _.._..� »..r__ � -'' -
b
*ETf
l sMJPA r nrAt
an$8 jt al�'flMd''rM r � F�
clAsm III Irf n I;
I
• •r _ M!1rRG f
r 1 S
-S p A r � ,t>>ta 'Will
..
I - P,,,fvt , title
4 : si�r�rr�Nc nnrlt _ I At3E ADC-)VVR..A P4I<b
1 3 US!N! Ir'AR K
I
I Corr
a a'x'rrrXdtf�
,
* y
Ott
2Q0� 0 tool r-b �CfPJA amm�i tav� pwwcnn, y_p�r 2
Ip arm ,a � v;rw r nr{re
�T
.
' f-IXMaC17E2 Clime..
4 /
NV .1:9.5 . •
..t
FVIiF,PhLH-. �
RDADWAY'-
rPLAM17'.
'tJa 0 1 f;5
\\
/'•
NYR1WA1P1n-.
: 1
•,
i T !J �
�. , ��24
�a4'1��•
R
,A ..v P
hC�
u»EV MN#u "
A1,A
/
(M! NO! t'ORM nrV✓IWy `+""l � ~ "".�
I
�
• 'IFQENp -
�•.+•++i.nM..+++ w41ER WAAIN
"-•+•*"•D�---•� SRM M WATER MAW
C3 CON RE1P MONUM&Nt
.�.r.�,....rr PROPER rY I.WI
tWOLFCA w 11 cmm
--'-'DETC • YELF"M.M AND CAD(.F
---! UNDEN(Y+CMJM F.11CMK
_...___ P --•-• O'4%1EAV POWER
-^-- 7---- - VMF.RCROUM TELEP!IONL
GAS
I
a POAO r 1/NOFHORAIN
J21117 m 3517C' 60M _-M5
�. // / t.}b) N1 / 6n'..2tl' RCF11 1 Ap-.:u,..l...-.r „_..., ' 1-J:u�° \�y J 5 -. C\..I1%1- u u ; • __1.,. �n". n . �,4.'�.'?}'{�,�M. . _c _.. -,i, .. y\-`µ_N'A 1 �• tb._A✓v' g',} p �- / / •\
.:,.na,M '•1. I ✓ � � ...1.>(.-,��.-oy _1. � -_u-,: ! n � .FP..0
1 N 4NT_.. 0 -E 5F wm ATtR 1vNa n8 �. 1 %rt {_HYOPANt MARSIMII•S SEEDj''NS ASH
a-10-VAt H� ® . , 'A tEF I••3 30 .•
. BURY F.lEV.»Jaf.3
ff ' v \ ! �r / r 10n]6 CD1/2t ..._--__Y WAiFR M3JO Rn . � �\ r ru3JI.70 I BI1HY EL.,•SM.T 00 ONICFP/R'R
691M I-A}N,jjS \ \ + Z.
R�f' y__40
.33; 1 .10 _ SRM1M I.J}1 f0 \"..� �` ... SL MER y7JI..5B 1' -.... ... SrW46. Y 30' 1.}IEROEIJCY , WAR .1.. .1 bvr32.00 I •.--..- T,'RE B CBp22 CMP I1 uIv . 33 10 SS �CA)JJ.a .S WORIM 1..)J f,Jn I *u} JMMI PLANt } r. (. W311.tE H.O.W
\�._. _.. i 2 TYPICAL ',' / NA ITR/SBM'FR .. '�x>'� ] n?0R
11 ')hICPE58fn /'. 9E W'IR MM,/r} 9-n^ VM.MS 1 k
12.00 �.... 11 I /. 31J.D.S r•.N0./S FNO SCC nRN.S 1 1 (/��`�\ vR' R I'Drp21
( •1 / .% "C .... S10Ry/--J.tB.OU J33.e5 ,;' tl' !-JJ2.aG 1 } YROP05ED S1 I0 N1 �IAN S,J fi=33).SO ._. WAAP.,t54M
,'tDMM F0N0 0URE7 `, 1•• J3.JC a \-� I %/A
MY JiPA �` 'V / SBwEN )+J.11.00 rrib B 11,020 ` 1-,.ADb ��t nEPE<
.,,y , W,y� r!•ry y�}yp { ,.Jn i ._ ._ --' A5mlim 1-mz 2 � ' i / t.-A7
Kri HR01F. IM15 .... 1 IG17M (.,Vn. :' I ' �fA`.'E4F....-..�..0 ...... ...........,.... -..--_
qqss 41, /```��� Arc ��/ A'T
,•. MTAMP'Ef1V :M^E 2 j / I rK �i is nslGNs® J / I I r IY1 EADO LAAYi./ } PrOJPct numDe YbOdlO,IA E 1 UUf
EXISRMB POND BUSINESS PARK PruJPrl Ingf _ RFT 01Nw . MAM_
.� - 2'lDESTRAN J - EtLX-?MOk ' BUSINESS
,pP RPI
i GPADF G. T I S De l y' _ ChRc", d
TV:1 - !y/p3 � ..70. Burlington, VT y
1 1 INS A(I. 4NC PCP N$. R15 011RIN(: GPADF
I I I 11 lOW FIOW fONDIRFMJS CLW 1Ar`i 9{/ I* 1 I) C OFG411BR , ,Ne 1 YtRW.
•-____�... K .�,y�--�- x ..- I �'. 1 fMMfIP /O OBSFR YT WviN.l ARCW 9 � I $HCeI CIUe ��'}�t Street Extension ?•r
{yj r wf KR.uominM.mrc 0 r
NM.1 KAM W„ SJi A Road Profile 22+00 To 33+00-
//r;// RP'ARIp9 [keGrbNa - u W �' TRUUELL CONSULTING ENGiNEER& INC.
Dots e-
�^ -•_-� ] 14 Filoir PR,M Rnod enK )OR WBIIFtM, V9,mo,•I 05445 D/A-5.1t1 P 3
al+i iJn]. '3 '.. 2.3N
11-34 .141.6J , _la Y.nB All 112,39 Ja'<Rn S4,I.e1 J a,'.r
.T
1 I �
RW I'A .: 27A75
- w R '_ ! PW nA - 3+?.no - -
.. (� - J} .• r. 1 ._ i r,1 �7{ _ PM rLFV « J4f O0 ,R _ NN S{ 9, A.O. ., 2 3e p' _ ..
t�.00 Ael.93 -
... w §: A_Y.2 W �M �' $y - .. - "�^ -:
94Q tt "' r(. r. ,. -.m T�.. 'I. __ L _ Ci R �::^¢ - 41"
` "^-..._ ..--...._,,,,_,_, : .. •..... P 'co
6
, R y
G
='
342
eW
•4six^{�'=N�`1' ,
... ((_-..•.�... •,�.._ Fn ,,: 4.,.1 f ti.c .. I. :, '_- -. (MV J40.1.
3}0 ^ F 1 YW _
�.� 1 I-r in s7'^ - .-R-.._- �-•--1 111 i PCR A _-...;1 �..X1E• C 1, 1'IPC Nrn 8� P�
2'i1f)NI/• _...
Ssn.DOB
2.
-------------
�-•...."„e:.1. �:14 I nro
iJ..._. .. :. ... ... .. _ - .. - _
1 r , t
.W. P
vt
, I. ,. •,:.,.,.w. 6r,IC 'x H.fJ. .r
ui I' rr
� .--�.•�-. tl PS1+,J.., BPVi.
D.1. aASs 62 wA CE NANL
ry 1.
_ .. .. '..: CONCAI TE ENCASEMENT 20' LONE'
u, •I .. , R I �+ .. i CCNRRED ON PIPE ARCN
1
wr
I
n
i
is+oo ?s+rm 21+60 -3�b6 ._ � ;w+bti' _ _ 37�co 20+06 -_•. lasso Jo40o ai+Oo 32+00 1�4+00
9
\
WATER 9L4w";
1
1
WICAP A DmUS1
BI.OfX,I.,TJO J0
-
N^TL:
E`ou SCRNCF f01'
TAT It LC n7 M1, 5"
:1E'f EINf.'fi FI
.fA Da�CBIFB
+'yJJe.DD
I JJ2.W 1
I
EP11111E cL
� •+ sno.Eroa
T + 220.82
L '}jS.BO /
TI
'\
STp1M
Ri.
\
�RENCH1
-��7 �
epI
WA iFR 1=JJtl 30 I
N
IL
I
srxEa m:uaao \ �-
1 ` +
T-
a0
_
I, V
•.# ROR S f•v.
-pv-
r
1
a'""brT
W VAIYt ' •
1
Ly
T
,
CLASS M Wt 1LANR BI1111R ROUHDANY -
f
RVARDN AM URN
CF DISRtryCI RI[ ECfCoWCI:G, TEI. FPHOIIE, AMC CAS LAYOUT AM; THEIR COW i, IJC1!ON
- -
OETAEr SHOW ON TINS F•I.AN ARE CONCEPTUAL VIE ("At LAYOUT %.AN,
CONSIRWTION VE7A9,S AND SPELIFlCA P3118 MCL BE T'RFF'ARfn OY DIE'
.. _.
ti
'
` 1 Al'PRORRmm Uml CONRANK THE CCMIRACF D.5TKfN We UnLITY AM
CLAS5 N Mf RAM MONN(N1RY ' 50' WTVAM PAyrtzr
{ `\ �.-._.- .._._{ AME) VA%OVS TARS RED G iT NJAIAIt AI ".MRR� 9CA"OU rolS
\\\\ PROV:CIION AltEA I ANY SU1:FI U%.17Y ON PL 9 IS SUOXCI CHANf.'. AND WHE FMAL
(/)ti
%AN:i Of THE (M11UTY COMPANY M1lL GOKRN
fOR SICWMWA ICI "M )Y
ORNANR SEC Slkii P7 1 I I {/��•j / .
I " '.I CMP CM SE �MN i
J WA TER/57MtM I I � II �1{ I / �':✓ // y� , 2 WC1 FENCC .g
1330.pC�1YPKAl
$R1PM i.+,IJ0. 2U I"4 A I a TCMER SF'RNCF,
_-SCMR SfUFA1 A+CAP.MS.6A
S,UAkVr .I 12 1
WATER 1='SJO.OD 1 1 I ! r- INN J:1 .7 j 5Y(acM I.+ a.15 I RAS`. TWALE' '/ '{J \' SCR£R/SIORM
r
I 1 ! �'/r Simi-J3
I
5.10•3,12,2tr
R
Y -.,�
STEMLWWATER PONp � /4 / -06 j
i
dd..' I . .17ER wATER/Jnt Mf-
-- . , J r,�
l ' l•.` / ` 4a n1 }M tEa '.' DO
V , o_ I. IJ`YL
a[WER/S
l
FORM._. / %AER/Wmr.
nEBEk i-332.90', ,��f;'�Y1f:f E�It ENO SfC ION ;` I / `�// � vCRA: RE If ENO �! I AT f.AP.., 17.R(��� SFN[N I•!1).1A 41
SiclaM;-3,1].T5, �� 1-SL.SC \�`"'^ Ircm, 4-335.f0 WARR I..Si. xa
..../.'
;
d.
W
�r n EON
_.`S^44,f l''z_--'T'F w•^'^_`-.-�'a'. (i_^'_^-I'r�-RTft.YT7J wn n'R_ A
Fm
' _. C: OW(i\gtY022 g60221RSA 6-17-b7 1::50'. 24 pm Ea
ot'74G s+9My/ aw tit5rwWMZ->30NF6'.
'. �
-
t0+'f7Rik:1!t)k 'J�fiAi$,A40 srtitfkntrr�Iqp��i g"� �v iMP ..
�`�
I r�—•
`
nrorgrR!aft IrtY.lr* tx1uP/Nv »rt �jNiRAG; Ni+ N!t UrUrt nxS
*.� nl[ pfThtx'M rrit ��uMdn !1a tr. M?man!tt
`
I .___ ,-
AM1A vARn.N/! regcs. Rtl;a»xL ra r� r�4{'R r,M+ w
��.
'' -
ANY SVrN U11L tf». 1.yfC p+ V I5 �vs,e:Cr,� rilE' nN.n,
PE a.O or me MI.,'caup•nNr Rv.� r.6+,nrH
•:,,
y
• "•, '. �.._. , , ___:_. i., ,' .; ,,
,....------._-__._ . ..: ��^—""".'"� .•'.., ._.. l
Y 00,(Z.- I,.-"7""""••F 34400 -- ,75� UO l70 I'm:YF £+In CURTNfi nrm A Nr cllr n+ '~�"' (1 q
\ -_ _ ,..•-_ `' „ T ! , �•••..' CA iqN H 3htlS Sf.G EYA)N.)A( 1' 1 l M i
u -
t
/
4.
- and u r�s rx
Re.we+w W�crpftp+n
,
,. -'. _. '. .:., -+•r ,M��`.ke wr .'w mat c: � � I �'i �
4 ;
q�A
-
.r
i 5
eM5»NC I
P '7
7
t
I
I 1 n
I
6�t'iif["..: .. _,', � .._-_ter"' � r,.•' ( ."' j', !
1
1
I
.i.X'
-w
a
( I -
m
Yri
hr
I 1 x
�A4 Vl
454M
•� t
}
I r<A f•Y D'h..F r£ry A. A1'M It
BUSINESS PARK
Swift Street Extension
oad Profile 33400 To 40+50
'RUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEER � INC, A^a� !
n Rlab
Ij
_ I
_
i
T _
1
I
t
60
41
r
I
' SQCr
-i
-_ _ __ _ r•"I�-t--w
_
_
- r
-5.
k— {
i
v•
�A.
r�
ti
-
-
_� _� _�.. ...ter_. .5.,:_. ...:w. �r.,i ...._ : _.._ - __•__ _,_.
-
no
-•••-..3 WAY HYOPANi, AWWA C-'iO7 LL
-7 NOFAIE,FfyEPANr )JODY FCR PR(MFR,AtICNMENT
1�
-•EIVRY LIRE ELEVA FI(w. MARK
j1� • rJNISeKO WADE
--. RL,IDINO VALVE WX AND 1.10
II".'jil,lkul[,I�jti,1411��1P��Jfli. -Owl.
, .._ MA EE x/s r„Y WUSNED VOTE BELOW DRAIN PORT
j- TNNUST btO CLASS D CONCrfl2
LJ
90 0 FT OrARFNC AREA
AWKA GAIT VALLT. C-SOD
- "LW, ANCHOR' 9. r, F fAASt O CMCWCIE
N.MIMMUM
11$T 4fS,AN$ R7'ANCHfM VAIW i C T'R'1 r n M,I.
I E
_..-.:. / SWj pz JO NT HYDRANT IF C AWWA C OF
,+ p USF IA Mm Pot TFNYEr E BETW 1,H ALL rI M-2 AND CONWCTf.
Iu DRAIN IF BELOW- f -�. •-�..
I M.t ~�
DO NUI COVER WAIN � I r '
WA IFR FARE
PORE WI H f,ONGA•EFF t ...__- ...._4_ iHAI15I DLOCK CLASS D CONCRETE
t. IV $(1 Fr NEAHING AREA
II� I I �- I �Ib� 'IrE .II' % _Ij I _:',1 ) I I=-1'li .jf l�•
SIDWL AJ)N, HYDRA., LMNEC II(Xr
(If 5M"cl, Ar1Ni CONNECTOR 1S FACTU:;I,D. NIEN ADD 311• ROD ANO LUfS)
f`f%PROTECTION HYDRANT
Co"PACM TO RECORD
L"LCVA it- W" PIPE INWRI
NARK LOCATION VAI.K AND -
II
CND CAP WIN A fi4 fo'OHT TO
i 1,
OF CCA IA t"' A ]NI GROUPAINTED
r THE SURFAC.0 AND PAIN20 BLtif."I
- VALVC' LOCA It(' AS 5110WN ON
PUCE. 1xd OIREf. tLY ON CAP
PROFILE PLnN5
I L
Ifil
,
-ill
i I
T I
ill. I r
T I
sr 1(IIN6 VAL W A:IA
I
j
A11N
Flo
ILL I�
l
l
1.1
llll B' MINIMOM ti
llv..i.
,�Trll
r
rAP NTPf
ti MECHANIC At
JOINTS
A.-GAFL .�
AL VE C-, l
- WAIIR MAIN
1 CUNNCCII(.w
W. IOxIO.N
1
LI,I
tII {
_
FXILM SERVICE TO 10' I
f RE OR fo,e
CRooSR A9
INp1CA TEO
F
LSE ✓OND' PROPERLY LINE
,
I
1 .L
LII� �. :. •
:.,.I It
II'
r
.POC £D,YLLNC.
;L.�I�'.:I
,
I
I I r
f
4
- CLASS D f,ONLRE'R THRUST VALW ANCHOR 5 C.F, \ CIAS'S D CONWEIE THFUSI �
BLOCK, IRO KF. INARING AREA (YANS 0 CONCRETE' WIM BLOCH. 18.0 Sr, REARING AREA
R K DAHS AHOUM VALVE FOR TEE
AAACHED P) CONCRETE ,
Q
TYPICAL WATER SERVICE CONNECTION
TXA• _ L,L,..
ni -
- r
--iMS011, SFFD, Mn MULCH,
OnRFNI FDA SE11LF„MENT _
" yL yLQ1yVyL11N1GWiAYWNRLMMJdyyAWWI
f
rip
--FIN OR SI/AGRADE
xr'
+
(
-
tV
1
orA-OAMprops AACKFILI. RI U iPIE
OF DE SO I, FILL RFEE 1)R
F CC
HO7EN $0 IL FILL U Bk'
flM1F'AC.IF.D(N'fp' IIFR
A �jll
n 'a r wnrTR
_ �
r)I+ILANI 1AXLI1 71 TCNI WE
`•-11 �..I�L--'.11 iTl '-�II
7
TYPICAL WATER TRENCH
- WAiEk En Sf IN CDVIK'
gIA1�- •... FIFFISTFED GRAD
I'ri 9I M1'i 'r, . it Ilr ;I
-..__S, An G VALVE 90X
NM IID
- 2 QF•f t INC NIJT
5' MINIMUM - RMN COUNTER ct"WISE 10
(TREY CAM VALVE
AWWA CA IF VAL WC-500
j -- WENA IC"', J)INr CONNECI'A.
111 - AMIL POI YF' MWENr DETNECN
VALW' AND CONCRET
VAL If;ANCfKNI - 3 OF
CLASS b f,ONC'RE 2, B tl DARS
POUND VALEANACHED TO
C(1NWEFtNO -
II
IN1
70VO SkClfKAIILWS FOR
SPECIFIC MAIAACiURLRt
-eTYPICAL GATE VALVE �--__-___.__ Ji1-. f`oi
01,01112221
DA' FILL. COMPACT AND
PATCH EAMUNC RUADW'AY
A' VIRECIED V IIIE
FNGINCER
I INISOF.0 GRADE
AWp
- 11NN I: VALVE ROA ANU 1111
SNIT SLEW EYOF LAPPING, SLCEVE 001.tEO OVFF'
Cx1STTNG WATER MAIN
-- It' WATER (7Nr'
-t MITE bEFMFEN
I _
AM) C001 17
VALVE ANO CCILtNE. '
VALVE MCHM 9 GE CLASS U CONCRETE
rl .1'
W'IN LE d BARS AIFAfMO t0 GOHCRCTE
r ..vF
A LEI tS D CONCRETE NRUSI BLIX,W
14 SF. BEARING AREA ON UNU154)"lo
FRENCH WALL
TYPICAL TAPPING VALVE
g
A. ML10R IU FILING PUT INTO SERVICE, WAFER MAINS SHALL OE Dl'7NECCTED ACCORDING TO AN,YA w.C1-
FICAIION C-65r,
B. ME NEW LINE SHALL BE FLUSHED AT A VETOCIFY OF NOT LESS THAN 2..5 FCEY PER SFCUN, (UPON
2-1/2 INCH HYDRANT ! IME-CTZAVA FLASH FOR A PCRICYI DETFRMINCD RY ME CHGINEER FOR THE
Nr' MAIN DISINFECTED. LENG A MA U RE D15I FC ED
C. CHI EANNAi1- .SHALL RT M.Cf MTY 1RN.0 AYINIRLKRFCING A H)PHCHI PE IE 'iOLUTILM' WIN A CONC1H
PAFION OF 90 PARTS E'ER MILLION OF AVAUARLE LYA.MINL.
D. USING A NOZZIL: AT EACH CNO NYMANT, CONTROL BIT RATE OF FLOW INIO ME NEW MAIN AND
PROPORTIONANY FEED PE NYFLY +LORIh' &OLLTTON INTO THE AM. AFIEN IF LYAMINE NRS
R[ACHED ALL POINTS IN PIE SYSTEM, CLOSE PEE VALVE SUPPLYING WAv..R FROI Mr AISTING MAIN
AND THE F,ND HYDRANTS. MAINTAIN /HE HF.ANLY CHLORINATED WARE IN THE MAIN FOR 24. HOURS
DURING FIRM' TIME ALL MAIN LINE VALVES SNOULO Elf OPMAIM AFTER 24 HOURS PIE MINIMUM
CHFORINE •RE'31DUAL MUST RE AL LEAST .10 PARTS PiLft MILLION.
'. f SH HEAVILY CH 1 A NATER FROM OOILM N AL P M E LINE M AND REF L1. THE LINE FOR V TAKE AN f LI SEA ICE KC b
AN' UN A UA AGILITY. rNAl ISM E CF NE RA7CEMP !0 PIE SIAIE AI-D -li T. 1 FA pC5Y Fit
ARE OBIA115FACRXtY, THE 0IS7Nf EC IJON RROCF.RVRE WILL Tk'RI PEAIEP -lit SA tF$FACTMY HESUL. F.a
Art4 oetalNEP.
�DISINFECTION OF_WATER MAINS
_
- IA'All ) JN rU ni nlf .) J EMT
-I
rr
Ff
•-�11�� . _
�y
•-•WM1�ER MAIN
(APNAW M f1ELDW SEWER IINrJ
i
I
1N• NMI LM tFJ'A n11ON
JUMrED PIPE• EENTER
la
11
RuLL,A 'T, WA )EA
PIPE CN SFNEA PIRE'LC
71
ANY OTHE^ WAFER I ME
ii
AHNr TO RE 10' MEN.
FROM SEWER PTPF
SI'W2'R MAN
t'II iIt ,II
}lj[
.11.i
WATER / SEWER CROSSING Jfd'=1'D
-- �a.
USE CL AS,S D (2500 PSI) CONFRETE I'1IN NPU.SI PLOL'KS, PLACE A NIL. IA(AYENYLCNE IArNEEN FITTING AND TNPUSI III,- PLACL INRUST -
BLOCK AQA)N31NMISTURREL) FRENCH WALL CONCRETT: BfARfNG AREA CW I'ITIING', TO BE A MINIMUM N')/2 $BUARE FOOT TI"Osy BLOCKS
BASED ON 200 P51 WORKIW-, PRLSSjFN PLUS SURE ALLOWANCE OF IM PSI. •� iL4 L _ ";' -1 1}I-1 11 I
,
1 ) !
1"
90 ELBOW 90' TEE 22Y ELBOW 49 LE W
E O
D113CTIOLIOR i 0M, Ay
,�. J I. - �:. .... •-.... .. FXR"ND 0. INTO ._.._. _ ,.__ _..
CAP W/ ML f. H. AIIIIF MCNM WALL RBNbkm
1 i +d07E` FNR PEDUr,FRS, PROVIUL
11 P !t nt991F ( )J by J.
9EM7NG AREA FOR ME U--�.Y -
. -.-INENCN WAIL. IVPlCAI: TlT•CBA$EO ON RtlWPOUNDS
-
FOR EACH 2 1" RCDUCUON )
UNDISTURBED 9INL. IN t17E. .. .._..��._u.-v__.... -.- _. __.. _...•::
TYPICAL
[AP REDUCER
THRUST BLOCI( TABLE N1B1NUAl-flE9B11EG BIiCd.1H.}OIIME_LEEL_OY.VMD13_iURBEO_DfCNCy._WALL
Ar
h 0• 8 O a
$O71 3 C SEARING
I)PE LOAD I.BS/FTI Uf
_. - T!Y 90' AS'T22 S 90' AD' 2T.3' ifI PU A3' 2T 3 r Y �9U' 3 22 P'V pU' 129_
I tI'
CLAY d.0 LBO 23.0 11.0 T.0 98.0 .0 T1.0 10.9J9. '3.9.0 .f0.0 1 0 CL 1p003.0 2U d,0 l0 10.3 'I5. BO JB 0 3r p a
54ND 20W 2.3 U 1.0 3..$ 7.3 A.0 a.0 9.0 IJ.O l.0 JS 11.0 iR.O 100 3,0 SDP97.9
DRAWL .IOW 2O '10 J.3 .9.0 JO T5 B:U9QSILT20M 1.1 09 TO d,d TO t0 05R:
SIIALf r(KKKI 10.5 OS L.D I.r IU US 2.O T5 1.7
A itl J.0 J5 TU D
r 61� MAIN THRUST BLOCKS -^ N.L$
TFSfra; WA TEA MAINS
A. AFIM THE PITY: HAS RE" LA10 AND 2 DAYS WMP THE CONCRETE THRUS) FLOCKS AND ANCHORS
HAW BEEN PLACED. THE WATER MAIN SHALE. RE HYDROSIADCAUY IE'STEO ACCORONG TO AWWA
.SI CCIFICA7IM C-GW.
8. rONTR CTW SHALL SVPPL� ALL NFCIS R AF-PARAW FD PTRICRM RE NYORIXi1ATEC TEST
C, IT ST PHE35URC SHALL OF. p.OQ PQVNOS, PtR SOUARF (N'Ir .L)f+ I %j TIMLS !HL Wt)I+KING PRESSURE
MEASURED AT M NEAR INE HIGH POINT Fei INl. S). TM. tM40itiik 1� GREATER TEST SHALL Of A
4INJMUM OP 9 HOOPS IN WRA!ION AM ME TEST P4ESSURF SNAIL Wf VANY MORE THAN
5 151 FOR ILK DURAIION OF THE TEST -
D. 'HE PROJECT ENGINEER AND THE MUNICIPALITY SHALL BE CONTACTED 48 HOURS PRIOR TO TESIMO.
ALL VAL WS SHOULD RE WRIFTI'D A G OPEN• R CLOSED A AFW PNIAP' FOR E 1 E 3 PEON 0 $ Po O Pit PW 1M
OF THE Wq TER MAIN BE JOG TESTED.
. AILO ATir.F LEAKAGE SHALT. NT COMPUTED BY [Fit fORMULA: 0.(5'.x 0 x P)/IJ).200 WNc RF Q 1.S
c LEAKAGE IN G'AtIONS PER HOUR. $ IS THE. LENf,)H Of PIPE TENTED IN FEET, 0 IS iHF NOMINAL
DIAMETER Of THE OWC IN INCITES AND P 15 MC SQUARE BODY OF THE AVFNACE TEST PPESSURE
'IN POUNDS L•Lp SQUARE INCLI DURTNI THE TEST
G REPLACE. AND RETEST ANY N9RK FOUNO TOOFDEFECTIVE
TES TINE NYrIpAN 75' .. .
A. AFTER E 11NO it E WATFN MAINS (.WlN FRPRPRHYDRANT FULLY AND F1LI WfM WAI.R, TO PREVENT
CAPS FRM REM" IADWN OF, WNT NA OM ONE Of FitCAPS-NUKEIT f9 MEMO rRLED, .MIEN
ALI ME AIR HAS, E'CAFIO.-77GNtFN ME CAP. ,
8.. ALLOW tHE PNF95VRE F0 OUII.O NP )D MAIN LINE PRESSURE AND CHECK-FV LEAKAGE AT FLANRCS,
;NU21lL. AND IIR' MIPATHFG .SEEM
C.
CLUSF THE.Nyb9ANi, RI'MOM ONC-NOZ2tE CAP ANQ PLACE THE JPALM OF YOUR NAM OIQYE THE
rsr.NrNc. URALNACE.S"O"L" CREATE A. NOROEAI E SUCTION .
TESTING WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS
d,. , y - ------
�"' Vf "' Y :5:'' •� + `1111111 frIAMF k , III
1AKi
i la)t7. iS ENAL[ Rr'il"IED
)I. Ill. _`l _.
LCD-SCWEA"
,-. SOU, I'
So it .HARD OR)(X
SO .• OR
. R SS PVC' '�
.. r, _
•"'
\'
: BRICK ANU MOk IAR U 511NG IpNPI(S
'
? PHOV10C S1XOOM: s M 11�r
4' tt
I `•
MINIMUM IWD r.(KTRSLS, MAXEMUM I: INCITES
TRANSITIONS RLi+k:T.
INVERTS OK Mil'psll'; .'
f""."CENTRIC CONICAL TOP SECTION
3 tF OLPNI t# MA1110i
RIM 10 CEHiItL{NE IkVIR
I
til OLE..' 1
THEN A 11 Yr7 11a BL
INS lAfLEU,: ip DErnl f6
F'APCF,T F,'x TERIOH dOINT9 WITH -
Y IELT Ot MORE,, PwN
.I.
- - '`y
HYONAOLTO LL`NE•Nr
A CONICAL -ICP wILI Pr-
1N5)AELEO.
!
n.; 1
"+
„__, BUM BURNER SEMI
�.
9F" !)fA I
�
--GYN17 EN7IAF. oursWe wj R, P1lA, r
:._...WELDED WINE FABRIC (5 X 6 YMf)
I
•I'
,I
..._...LADDER RLRJGS O 17' O.C.
USE MANHOLE STUBS FOR ALL PIPES.'
DMICX AND MORTAR ,00m..D INVER r.
I,
I
SLOPE TOP ?' TD INVERT
r4 BAR$. R' OC., BOM "IS
f?" BANK PUN DeAM BASE
OR Al REBUIRE'D BY CNOINEER
IF WE AND IM I)N$rABI.E
(i •. Uk 1V �-Lb /1�Q �.. 11' ,"
cONUIIION$ MST.
•:_i711
11 +n1 IIII :rlil�
SEWER MANHOLE
TYPICAL
'
"CHTRA1191 IU RECORD CLEVA110.
DF PIPE THAR)AT CAP
'MARX END of SETIVICE WI R( A 70'2r4
PROUQHT TO SURFACE AND MARkED
VR IN RED NAINE. FLAU BOTTOM O'
2X4 DIRECTI.V DN TOP OF CAP.
......_
». GAP (10' RE YONO PROPERTY JNr)
OR AS11JDIPAMD
_
.. -. 45. RENDIt
11 111 •IIII lI1
_
8 ME
III
SEEs/TE MAN
.'. r+Dw
QLAN. V EN'
4
7
B' 'Efth' MAIN
IB
SLWEN SErRVI f,E
......... .._. ._.
_._, PROPERTY UNF
_..
Oil ... A t t PER 10:)1
S (NDICA IEV
dt ASCNO
- TEE
I
"'-8" SEMJI MAIN
I11
II;Tt�(I,}�u 1UL
I'�.�
I,,
1
Ilf
kILYNJId.I•YJLW
11
4 SER VICE CONNECTION
Fit, MURQFH MANNC4.E su r,W.
/N1-An' 1"
�• 'S1'41NLESS STEEL CLAMP
J' MIN rMOV -
..P.__.A..-
NDIPAEFD (MJ PtAll
AS IPt
HAr1I,OLE V.SI
MANFi 1 E STUB
c
ru e
I.
NI s. -
jiF 1HERL IS NO LCARAQC INTO Tel MANHOlf AS fir IEAMINE'O
i Of THE MAMAXE. HOWEVER, IF THE rNO1NEER I$ Nir
TEST At PFSCRIBED FIERrJNBErant
Ik EONE LiTOU A pERfUD OF ONE in Wll L BE
71J TIA11 `FBE. HEFILtlT1 TO THE'TOP or ME CiDNC
CNO a RIE TEST PERIOD, Tip' MANHOLE SHAL& BE EfflU:ED
It
SHALL BE
'(XMNVEP IED TO A 24 NOUR RATE AND THE.
SHAU NOT EXCEED ONE GALC(Ax PER I"nCAL FOOT
IECNV BY DK. LNOINLETE TO BRING THE'LEARACE BITHIN.
F, VACUUM TEST tHE 001, TRAC Fz* S11AIt funomI MF MAMI(Rr CONE SK4, VAG<IUM PµMP, ALL NEVESSARY.O UGCS, HOSES. AND EQUIPMENT
TO PERFORM 'M( I'll,
C FILL ALL LIFUNV HOLCy Aff FXrERfOR MIAs WIM Al4`ROVED NO4-SWUN P W ITAR AND KM ALL 0--n OPE.YINCS INTO THE MANHOLE.
TO PREVENT DISPLACEMENT. . -
.il, INSTALL AN INELAfARYE RUBBER RfNC' Mr Sf]C'OF )Ht LOP OFT44F MAM4MEJI IM7AitNr THE RING WITH AIR. 11)A PRESSURE ADECIIAM TO
PRE PENT LEAKAGE OF AIR BETKUN THE RING AND DIE MANHOT;P MI.
1. PUB" THE AIR OUT W THE MANHOt IHROUCH AH OPENING IN THE TEST PLATE LINT7L A VACIIUIJ ]S CPrA TED INSIDE ME MANHOLE EQUAL iD
TO INCHES 01'MFRCIINY USING AN APPROVED VACUUM DAlla MEN STOP FIE•PENOW M AIR AND 14 IN lift' 1i.'ST
J. THE VACUUUMM CANNOT DROP DEI Ow 9 INCFH'S OF MER(YIRY WITHIN A ? MINUTE Msir PCRI011. 7F.-MOB[['' MAN A I INCH DROP OCCURS. WITHIN Y
NINU IF•S iN( MANHOLE HAS FAILEII. FIE TEST. ATJB Ii SHALL BE REPAIRFU UP Hf.LONS1R11C it ANb LIEN RETF,MIED UNTIL 11 PASSFS
K. bACKFILL ANC)L&D ME MANHOIC UPON SATISFACTORY )EST RF,SUL A_
TESTING MANHOLES
--OVERFRr e .NT
OVERFI iTI TO AH
1,L LI Y ✓ ,t. L 11
1 ON t ROreS ABOVE
I�/r✓�/r Ij .:.APPROVED BACXFJLL
ll
INITIAL QA:Mr/LI FREE OF
DEBRIS ROOTS, SIONES.
TI CLOGS OR lROZEN scu
S' MINIMUM O' COVER
CANND, X MAINTAIN(D
USE ?' RIO10 IH;'ULATJON
OVER PIPE
1 SERER MATH
J/,- SIDNC ID I!#' OT PIPE
eE I it
5 TYPICAL SEWER MAIN dt' r_D••
Fill, LENODI OF rill M BE - STREAM
CENn'RETJ ON STREAM CROS..INO
iJ
r I
I
i
: d d d d
CLASS B CDNLMEIE .
L
lflf. I(1 ,ill a(_ 71 .Ill11 F
A ONCRU
E'ENCAsE T I.-TRLA _C..,. iN
I I Ii1
AP _
A Ti',A"T,11F f= (A 4Y Y R 11 A PRES511111LO MR 11sl 1I W i v CON JL VE M14! Lo
THE TWD ANUS GF RIE PI{ AND t.441 11 INE AT..oiCvtR01 FOUIPMI III h l !A:
'9 9*ky Alp SLAM Y:TO 14 R1Pe WTI REM'lIINC A �gY51ANf Ykt: ( ,
INE AIN SU Phy'SO.nIAY IFIE PRFSS RPMAI PBOME J.5 PSl rr,, n rr, 3 )
.ALLOW TEMPERA TURL y>lAR1LTdAX11A+IN.
C. AFTER 1TABTLI2A1tON, ADJUST PRESSURE M, 4,0 PSI AND SHUT OFF AIR :UfvPLY W
SURE REACHES 11 W SEA" STOP "MI AND RECORD PEE TIME 17 TAPLS
TW 71ME REQUIRLP FOR DIE PIPE ,VZt MUST PE A,T LEASE
4 INCH .J MINUTES. PER 100 FEET
8 INCH / MINUTES PER TOO FEET
8 MCI, I? I4f TES PER $Do FEET
TO INCH 1 5 MIMES PER too FEET
12
INCH f 6 MINLI7C6. PER too FEE,. _
D it URRALS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TFBrm '111r AVERAGE OF Ill PIPE
LENf,RI) WILL OF CALCULATED AND -MULTIPLIED RY JR? KCOvDS PCR 1 f
RFAU YRED TDRF.
E. IF DIMS IS nfA01}NO, W,1'r,I ABC VE INC SFWEN LINE'.)Y4E All TEST 1+h15, •(. 1.1"-.a• 'r Its !. D'i.
OS's, FOR CACN r0gi Or WATER ABOVE INC THK.NT M ME PJ.^C
-TEESTiNG SEWERS
A
�I "' .. f U APPRDYEO HACRFILL
COMPACIFD IN IT' LfYT3
I
i
I [ft l --7F 5' IN CDVER OVER PIPE
CAN NOE lA MAINTAINED USE Y
91GJD lN51ULAilON DYER RIFE.
[l Ile
11: OI.M JS
Ai _p •_ i ... IE, MAIN
+� 1 AEJ/4 SICNE To TO' 01 PIPE
, I jf •,,CC+ ,(j, jj
N 1Er IN RDADWAY'
COMPACTION -V LI UE M
f II(il•_ — l 1... it 9SSITOR)ITY {S tANDMp
PRIX: TOR).
D
6 TYPICAL UNDER ROAD SEWER _TRENCH J/4"-"-Q'
TO IKFr/OunrT PIPE
I I I I
4
IT
III
\
STAINLESS STEEL CLAMPS
FOOT CAST IN PLACE
t-7-'N RUBBER BOOT
-- - 12" CRUSHER R04 CRAVf.I.
SEED AND Mt&CN SIDE SLOPES
I � �
P - - _ T EXTEND GRAW1 TD
DRAIN DRIVE
tit 11
LIOTFXVILE FABRIC
111RATI SOMI ON EQUAL
ip GRAVEL SERVICE DRIVE
4. �5
�nA �t• '
P
E. r,
1
....MS . .�.'tIF'1'Au
•ski „ '�
vT L
,,rt?9'H
TIWDELI_
CONSULTING
ENGINELRS, INC.
It Malt PNtk RUAd
Box 308'Wlli1 ton Vt TJ34 5 R74 TTII
ro
DeScrlpEloD �. Lltrf 0`,
RQYI�MMB'
\I1AY!\7M)2I\Vfp+!-7C'
� A
� 1
rlol<cf Lmc
MEADOWLAND
BUSINESS PARK
Hinesburg Road
So. BUTlin,gton, Vt. "
SI+Crf flflG
Sewer Details
rraj t nd b r 1
c;
P hct mtl - U wn I �; Y
4 {
Sc,,;ti• Ahf hrXf:
1!43 p
T=
'' 7r
REINFORCED CONCRETF PIPP
DTMFNSIONS VMY WIN
PIPE SIZE
O
Tr r I RIP RAP
LENGTH 10 FT
WIDTH 5 ET.
DEPTH lei.
TYPICAL CONCRETE END SECTION
Noll; UKWADRAIN WILL 9r, INDICATED BY TIRF CIT-
OR PROBCt ENGINI-IR
AS THEY OkE. AP OPRIAIE.
v WS rmmp PAvrmENr
FINISH 6WJNM FIRE 11
SEED AND MULCU
BASE COURSE TYPE 11
C-1/2'
14' ftANR RUMURAW. L
SC PLAN
.11e`UN0
1-1 Am
FA$PI
12'
r4-'\ UNDERDRAIN UNDER CURBING
--3' TOPSOIL
CONCRETE CURB
'LASS 9 CONCRETE
UNDISTURBED TRENCH WAIT
BANK RUN GRAW.,
3/1" - 1-112* WASHER
HARD SIMI
-WRAP TONE IN MIAAI I
FILTER IABqlr
" PERFORATED PVC
SLOPED 10 DRAIN
(SEE PLAN)
S-Onoo MIN. -SLOPE
rl'SOT., SEED & MULCH
"'rRIIII 10 ALLOW OR
FT
WrILEMEWT
r,�AZ 5
A
OACRILL TO Of FREE OF
DELBLIS ANO LARGE Slows
COMPACT IN 12' LIFTS, UNDER
ROADWAYS
.IiIII
WRAP RIOWE IN WPAII
Fit TER FABRIC
J11"1/y "APO SIONE
', -q�,
MR
CURTAIN DRAIN
HIAW D071 3 FLA"Tr INLET Fqmr A, ORATE
4 NEENAH 0-34050 OR LLBIANOR UF2A8 P
7
URDIIT WAVE TO I INCIAES FROM TOP
04](K AVxs z I
MINIMUM I vs
MAXIMUM • I� I.CME S
LADDER "4S #-12* D.C.
rw
SIRUCTARA4 INTEOPITY
7
I_00�T._
DIAMETER
D4 —4 0 21 4 5
D6 2 m
.1. 20L $4 Se a IY I 9�
o4 BANS, 6" BOTH WAYS
OR AS REQUIRED MAINTAIN
5_C,VNA,. IRTe M%Fll
12' (lRAVr1 TOP qU0,8ASE
U. -w lQ.;Q, , Q.-Up OR AS RFQIJIRF 8f ENGINEER
IF WET AND P tiNsTA&E
CONDITIONS f."IST.
UNDISTORKI) SOIL
2 TYPE -D- CATCH BASIN ------
p R()VTDA
24 * SO CATCH BASIN IK(T MALE
AND FRAME. WENAH P-34058 OR
'LOARON LF248-; OR EQUAL.
CAWI FRAMt TO RRICR ON STRUCTURE
4,
RPICR ADAjSIjIr COURSES
.111011. 2 COURSES
.A.i.w 12 INCHES
Z
-USE MINI TAR ALSWID PIPES
24: MAA. DIA. IIPE TON
JIB MAXDIA. PIPE pok
48:". CATCH BASIN
-!A
E
8'x " WELDED NBC FABRIC
R AS KWIRFn TO MAINTAIN
0 ON
BANS. d' D.C. WA Yv
7 �1�
OR AS REWIRED TV. MAINTAIN
STRUCMAI. INIEGRITY
12* BAIR RUN GR KL RAW
UP AS WED III ENOW.
OR ��Dj BONSEXIST
UNfiSRR*1fD SOIL
(2) TYPE CATCH BASIN
.... SMAJ 10KR
_Ur
24'
24- I.D. RFINI(R?WD
COIICREIF PIPE CAST
INTO SA�I-
(FvPE 1� STRUCTURE)
L
4 RATLO PW
CURTAPEIIN DRAIN
NON -SHRINK CROUT
r.
900
MAE .1.1
f MONOLITHIC BASE
-ORAWL
.9 CURTAIN DRAIN,CLEANOUT
TRUDELL
CONSULTING
ENGINEERS,, INC.,
t4 D1.11 P.1il Road
B Y)fl W11111IOT. Vt. 05445 A70-6131
Uj
ryll
V.
I.
Ik A r ng`-%AA1J AND
BUSINESS PARK
Hinesburg Road
MARK A 10' ' 'I,' SNOUCIII OF SERVICE m TILE
SUIIIA,r AND MARK D WITH
RED JITTERS S.11" WHICH
"'ADS FOR , TMM DRAIN, I. I
PLACF BOTTOM OF 2' X 4* DIRECTLY ON TOP Of CAP.
Sh-I fill,
STORM DRAINS 70 MATCH
Al CROW , OF PIPE '1: nTE -0" OATCH VAW�,
-
Stortnwater Details
M12- pm: wN 3"
12
FT,
I,, CAP 10' IIFY D FR.'111 I I
LINE OR AS ZNDICA M.D.
PIPE SIZE AS INPICAIEP W t' N
PLAN,
.2, 1 lf�
Ili.. III'
im-T jsl - , 111 fjjI
STORM SER VICE CONNECTION 2
S
NOTE • SFCURE MAY TO PREVERI
S"CRMWArER FROM PASWNG
UNDERNf,ATH.
IF11 HA YBALE CHECK DAM _
MINIMUM 5U CR AS SNUMN UN PLAN
� •As
1 uA A
•a.
J1
I4,
e }
q-1? 'L -'Y1ot g/ Uo t �OR ru 51. 4 0
1 FI`
/ •'-,RALFD HAY CM STRAW
' 1•. v I' A 3 HARDWOOD SLAKES
TEMPORARY DIVERSION OR EXISFINO SWAIE
COVISIAUCITUN .SRFGf11f.A BONS FOR NA WAIF
CNFCK DAMS li
1.) BALES SMALL BE PLACED IN A NOW WITH
TNT. ENDS TIGHTLYABUTTING ADJACENT '.
DALES..: TWO ROM IF REWIRED BY ENGINEER,
2.) LACY! BALE SHALL BE EMBEDDED IN TIFF.
I SOIL A MIN ARUM U A INCHES
.Q BALES SHALL BE SO.'CURELY ANCHORED IN
PIABY SrAKES OR PINS DRIVEN THROUGH
THE DIES. THE FIRST STAKE IN EACU
BALE -SHALL BE ANGLED TOWARD TIE PRE-
VIOU5LY LAID ONE. TO FORCE BALES TO -
OTHER
A.) INSPECTION SNAIL RE FRE000NT(MINIMUM
(NICE A WEEK AND AFTER CVRY RAINIALI)
AND REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT SMALL BE
MADE PROMPTLY (WITHIN PE SAME DAY)
AS NEEDED.
5.) UPON SIANLIZAMN OF THE AREA UPSPI'AM
FROM THE BALES, PIE BALLS SMALL BE NI-
NOVED AT IN ". APPROVAL OF RE F,NGI-
NEER.
CONSTRUC DON SPCCIFICAnONS FOR
S(ASILIZFO CONSTRLIDYION ENTRANCE
1. STONE SIZE SHALL HE 1-1/2 TO 2-1/2 INCHES.
2. LENGTH SHALL BE WIT` LESS NAN 50 FEET
A RUCXNESS SHALL NWT BE LESS PLAN 8 INCHES
A, FRIAR FABRIC (10PUI 50OX, OR FOUN) SHALL
BE PLACED OWN ENTIRE AMA PRIOR 0 ,
PLACEMENT O STONE.
S WIDTH SHALL of HOT LESS THAN FULL ONION
OF At POINTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS
6, NTEFL NECESSARY MOCK ANECI.S SHALL BE
WR O D OR CLEARED TO PURL SED MINI
L LE 1
PRIOR r0 ENTRANCE ON0 PUBLIC ttIGHi-0f
4 WAY: WHEN WA5111NG E RECLINED, IT SHIN L.
BE DOMESHED STONE,
ON AN gRCA STABILIZED WIN
CPPROA STONE. NTWHICHTRAP
GRANS INTO AN
APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAP SrOtUFNFRO BASIN.
EN RING M SHALL K IN,011PREVENTED FROM
ENTERING ANY STORY if USE, OlTAP OR
O
EROSIOTERCN NSE
OL NE IM USE O APPROVED
EROSION LCINIROL MEIWW.
I I'LL ENTRANCE 5MAL1 Of. MAINTAINED IN A
CONOINON MYTH WILL PREVENT TRACKING
OR FLOWING O SfRIMOT ONO A PUBLIC
RTOYnAF-WAY, THIS MAY REWIRE rE'RIUDIC
TOP DRESSING WIN ADDITIONAL STOW A9
CONDITIONS DEMAND, AS MEII A5 MAIN/E
OF ALL SITE MOTION, !YkITRDL NEAT!R
ALL SEDIMENT DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC
RfVHT-43F-WAY WALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIAREY
::•...:'�... ...••� 014 TO+. OF. SUGORAnE .
SECTION
4 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
Plwl'O:E ,.
IN A111MIANCE WI IM T}1E WRMONT WATER OJALIII' $TANDAPDS NE PUPPOSE OF EROSION CORRECT.
MCASLAF.S IS TO CONiROi TV. AN STORNIYA Off. FLOWS, MINEWCf.:55'APY. TV PFFVENI' ANY.UNU/L AO-
WRSE EFFIGY ON PIE DUALITY OF THE RECEIVING WATERS ING.UDIfIG. BUT NOT IIMITED O CAUSING,
.INCREASED EROSION. SEDIMENTATION OR GRANNIE ENLARGEMENT.
EROSION POITH71AL: 'MEDIUM
70FAL RATING NUMRfft (INN) : ARPA(A) i (SLOPE (S) ♦ TIME (Y)) A PROXIMITY (P)
RATING HURTER: 210
AREA, 3 TOTAL DIS30IIIED PLEA .. I M. -6 x
,AOIL 2
TINY 5
MIOXIMPY 1J
FAR: 3 v (2 1, S] + In .- 210
.. FNOSTON WNYRDI S:.
fFMPORARY, ,
A. STMILIAD CRNSMTUGrlON EOTRAN(X.,
f. THEY
rwTCF,gN
'. 51(1 1NOE
D. IEMPOfAR1'..SEbtNCYI TRAPS
E: NAYDgLECNECKO-IT - -
-PERMANENT,
101'S014 SET[ r M111 t l -
i ,r
Bs10NE Rlr-RA .
SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL'
`�7 ON CONSTRUCTION SITES
3) ril T IFNCE SHALL Bf INS -EC LED WEEKLY. AND AFTER
(MIRAFI EMVRO1ENCf. (IN APPROVED'
CA , SIGNIFICANT PPCCTPITATIOH EVFNT
EOLM MAYBE -"SrITLDI O)
AAAfF R ANCY. SHALL OF PTRFORNM AS NECO-R AND
FI4IER FABRIC, OR TOWN
Slnt I M F SHALL BE RFMOILO -tV -BUR OES' '
I16VLI Or IN !141! SILT FCNCE."
iy
WIRE'FANUIC
-
%�la.
- ' -•' - WDDOrN OR METAL STAKE
A)Nlt(1KFN gIAX ES SMALL RE RLPLACCO PROMPTLY
(MAX, TO'OC)
_
_
Nry FADRIC INTO;TPwMO (MIA.
L
lI
1)FENCI, F[),SI SHALL BC ORIVEN, ID FEET MAXIMUM OR
.III
I t
tI
L
L _ 1
7
'J
CLNrm. POSTS SMALL BE DRXW..N MINIMUM 21' BELOW
', .ONAOE. IENCE SHALL BE POSITIONED AS SHOWN
'(
ll Ili
1Ii
{ I
[�
PARNlcc.. to WE DRUUND•CbN I(N/P5
1)IRIR0I SNALI, BE F,KCAVAIED MINIMUM B INCHES
OFEP ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF VINCE LINE.
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
3)MAN WIRE FABRIC (14 GA:. 6 INCH MAX. Mf SH
OPf.NIfC) SHALL BC 51nrLED OR FASTENED .^.CWREIY
EO¢�(1%Z-SEDGE
SILT "CC SHALL BE EITHER PRE -FABRICATED
MIDI WIRE, LILT ID U"PICAN SIDE OF FENCE POSTS
WDWN WIRC FABRIC'AU,' EKIEND MINIMUM 36.
EROSION CONTROL FFNCC (MIRAFI fNVIROPE'NCE,
INCHES ABOVE CTAnL,
OR EOUAL), CA CO/S NLIICLEI)IN-PLACE,
AfrKTER FARRIC SHAH SE FASTENED SECURELY ON -
AS SPECI lFD HEREIN
UPSTREAM SIDE OF WOVEN WIRE FABRIC WIN WIRE
Q,RF_FABRTCAIFD yjLE f[,NCE
TIES, SPACED EVERY 24 INCHES. AT TOP AND M10-
1)FENCE WALI Bf- NSrAIALO PARALLEL 0 C:ROUND
SECTION CV SUNG[ MINIMUM B INCH FLAP OF FILTER
TABRIC SIINL PC PE1N TRENCH ON UPSIRUM
ALED
IMAD.
CONTOURS, AND FILTER FABRIC SIDE STALL FACE
- UPSTREAM, MESH AND STARES S17ALL FACT
SIDE OF VENCC ANW BACK
DOWNSTREAM.
5)WMCN TWO SECTIONS Or FABRIC ADJOIN EACH OTHER,
2)DIENCN SHALT. RI: FXCAYAD:D MINIMUM 6 INCHES
NEY SHALL IK OVIRL APPED BY 6 INCH 5, FOLDED
DELI ON LIPSIREAM SIDI' CN 1LNCE LINE.
EXCESS IIAP OF FILTER rMRIC (MINIMUM A INCHES)
AND STAPLED.
SHALL BE PLACED IN PUNCH. MCNCH SHALL BE
6)SILT FENCE SMALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY, AND NIL&
BACKFILLC) AND COMPACTED CYINSMUCTION IN
THIS MANNER PREVENTS SEDITWHT.LAMEN RVNOTF
EACH SiGNTPICA.NT PRECIPITATION EVENS ' .
MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED:
FROM FLOWING TINDER. SILT PENCE.
AND SEDIMENT REMOVED WIFN 'BULKS" DEVELOP
IN $141 FENCE.
SILT FENCE
SEEDING
AFTER DIF FINISHEU GRADE HAS BEEN ESTABLIbHFU AND iflC IFR1ILi!(.R SORE AO, PLANT' DIR SPEC'[TIED SEED MIXTURE AT A.RAIC OF A POUNDS
PEP r000 SQUARE. FEfr AND MR FIRMLY MID INE SOIL APPLY SEED ON INC PRFPAAED SFrV LED WITH ARPROVEO MLOIANICAL SUPERS OR
I I YDROSFEDINO EOL'IPME..NT UPON COMPLETION OF INC ABOK PLANTING OPERATIONS, POLL ALL ARCAS W7TN A WATER FILLED GARDEN MO.LEN,
LEAVING nit MA CE O. ALL AREAS TRUE. TO ORADE, SMOOTH, AND FREE 1RCAl HOLLOWS W ONi,n IRAECU.ARITIFS THOROUGHLY WATER At
NEWLY MANIED LAWNS IMWCD(AYELY AFTER PLANi/N4 USING A TINE SPRA
PROTCr RANKS AND SMALLS, AND PREVr4r OR REPAIR. LPMION TNAr CAICURS RANKS, SY IC' OR OTHER GOADED'AREAS THAT HAM: BEEN
WASHEO 1XIr'OL HAW: HECOMF DANAGTU :NAIL BE Rf."IFLID INMFDIATCI.Y (ALES. All-N) N I GRAMTED BY DUE EUGENIO 10 PLANT OF SCA-
SON. SEEDING WILL BL f.OWn,! ED ONLY DURING RE PERIOD FROM APRIL 15 10 JURY I OR AIEA051 15 1O'OCTOOEN IS, SO AS NOT rD CAUSE
1NIF.RFCMNK: NO -DINO. M TO PROCEED 5130RE OT IR PHASES OR THE WORN HAS FROORESSFO SUFFIOFENR Y.
WINTER CONSTRUCn ON
If FINAL GOADING, 515LDING, AND MUICHINC CANNOT BE COMPLETED PRIOR M OCMBFR 15 NCI SEED SHALL RE APPLIED:
MULCH WILL BE AP" LED IN NE FOLLOWING MANW..R.
A. DOMINO INC. NPNPLANIING SEASON,. APPLY MULCH 'O PW DI.SNRBRO AREAS INAT ARF O HE SEEDED DURING DOE NEW PLANDNG SEASON,
B. MULCH WALL HE APPLIED AT A RATE O ID TO 00 PWMJIS (2 RALCS) PER IDOO. SQUARE FEET AND TO A DEPTH OF a OR 5 STRAWS IYNE-
OIAIELY AT RR SPREADING MUCH. SrcLAr WEN A NINON $IIKM ,APRWOR AT A RAIN OF .1 POUND. AIR1000 SQUARE FEET, APPLY'U='
NETTING ON SLOPES AS REWIRED BY INC ENCENFF.R.
C. HAY MULCH SMALL CONSIST O NOTED ,DOD PROPERLY CURED SIfMS OF 1XILEN GRAINS (MEAI, DAIS, RUEA'AHEA r, E1C.) REASOFIAM Y FNFE
OFNEEDS TWIGS DEBRIS OR OTHER OR,L:G110NAOI NAIERIAL. IT SHALL BG FREE FROM ROr OR MOD AND
SHALL BE ACC[PTABLF TO IMF
CNGINCCR.
D MULCH RENDER SHILL BE A WATER 5OUAME BLEND ppFf CANGMIC/NORGANfc MAWRIALC, GFU.ING, NNIDI'NING AND COEL RINC AGENTS. RINDFP
SHALL BE CARA#" OF rO MINIl A SEMI-ROAO/8 BIWICGRAOAOI,E MST OVER SEED) C AREA
E'. MULCH NETIIW WALL BE LIGMINEWHI PLASTIC. COIGN OR JUTS NETTING. ,PRODUCT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE EWINEFP:
l AT RIC BEGINNING OF 'INC NEXT, PLANTING SEASON, REMOVE RE MULCHING AM SEED ACCORDING BY 'III SPECIFICATIONS
SEEDING AND WINTER CONSTRUCTION
ZVE:OBBBL' FRD.SIRN.-GRLaSBD1.MCASUREu:.
1) TIC SMALLEST PRACTICAL ANI.A O LAND SHALL BF EXPOSED AT ANY ONE TIME,
2) CONSTRUCT IEMPMARY AND PERMANENT SEVIMLNI AND EROSION .CONIF(N.
FACILItIES EROSION AND 5F.DPIFNT MEASURES 71ALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR
TO ANY EARN MOVING OPERATIONS
3) SILT FENCE PLACEMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED AS WILD ON PLANS.
PERIODICALLY SILT FENCES SMALL K WINTAINCO AND CLEANED UNTIL -
ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAW A HCALPFY STAND O .MASS
A) BEGIN MONARCHY MU.It ROTARY MULCHING AND SEEDING IMMEDIATELY AFTER
CON
S IBM ION OF,ALL FILL AND CU.T BLUES.
5) ALTER ALL DISTURBED AREAS NAVE- BETH STABILIZED NE IENP(AMY
EROSION COITR(K. MEASURES AM. 10 OF. REMOVEU
.EBD570H_LL7NIRDL:YJil11Y.k%LY81811GUR�d2LGi
U INC CONOACOIT WALL DISRRIB AND OPEN FRENCH 7MC-MINIMUM PRACTICAL
AREA REQUIRED OrM,COMPUSH EACH BEERS WORK. -
P) EXCA.LCO TRENCH MATEAIN SHALT OR PLACID ON UPSIMEAM' SIDE_ OF IRM—
3) IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING PIPE INSTAj=ON, FIFE TRENCH SNAIL BE BAC%CILLEO AND
COMPACTED. THE DISTURBED AREA SIN�C�'EE(' Q[ MULCHED AND. SEEOD ON A WEEVILY BASIS.
A) ARALIE TO SILTFENCES
CONETOIRS)LO`BANY 1W7ItK MCA INRNDED TO O: 0WMEDYAMY ONO t5"QED
FOR MORE DIM ONE ROSINING (AY .
5) EXCAVA"ON AND; PIPE INSTAM.ATIOI.SHN,4'OS AVOIDED, DLRLIG PERM$ Or
SrGNIFILANI PPECtNTAn(XJ
'6) AU. SLDNCHT AND EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES ANG WGEIAFI4 STASH IMTJON
SNALI. BE IN. ACCUtUANCE Y4`NrHL SPEC'IFICA IIONT FR.REON. ANO TTfC VF'HMONi.
". HMDBOOK'FOR 508E EROSION
5CdFMEN1 CONTRM. ON COMB IA'UCTION SPIES. II
l
EROSION _CONTROL NOTES
I
-NAY oR.'STPAW BALL
-.
INLLf G'kA IL
%
DUI' RAI.i5 1lKAAIFN 10 IORM A, ;,CRT III
'
I. , I. , S' IIMDHLIDO SiAwTC J ANCHOR
MALE: IIRM 1' to GOLD@
- �RI'JTTT('S,TIIIR�I�'jl / /� -
�
,/
J
CONSIRCOTION SPECIFICATIONS
i) Y Eb, SIIALI LOKIFI OF MOMED AND
A—.p.:._.-.it
PNA
ROBN
PP,O+",, CUkfO ORA55, SIRAWI, OR [FOUNE
/TjEE CF.WLED$ -
d
M�iN'IhhS REASONADL
NIGS OR" OR DRIER OB✓CiION.ATCF.
MA INS DAI SHALL BOUND
.
h
M FIVI. M
WUCCO BY 1N NE AY DALES COMMONLY 1'PO-
DOLrO ar:BA[(RB
'
IIClLJ1] I
-
- _
-r''
1. AFR'R CA , f PAS N I:: If PLAf,I.. L71 ( III(
My
GEAR ANT/ IN5(AL�f )l iL l{ FA0F1C'(NINAr'
141)) OV R'DI: PRAM(, AND nIt N'GL( r;RA tr
BACK IN PLAL'E
IHAY-DALES $IIAII..DE PLACED AROUOC ALI
II I� IVIf OT
]WETS NOTED ON PPE SITE MAN '.
'III
A.)
R
-
ONCE AwWm /ONO AFTER fKRYT ! µt)
-. AND-R[PAER ANOTFEPIAOMT.N1 OF 1N11
' PROTECTION ISMALL RE.MAOE PPIMPRY
(WITHIN THE SAYE 00) AS NEEOED.
'
5.) UPON STABDJZA/)ON ppF� THEMLA UPSI1EA11
FPON THE INIEi PROTECTION, DIE INLET
- PPOTECIMM SMALL- BE HCMOlAn) W7.114 PI'
APPROVAL OF PIC ENGINEER
3 INLET PROTECTION_
✓_ "'
_
MAINTENANCE __---��_•` _-
_.-_v_._. iIM7, O PI A((MLfII _-.,-__ram
1,/A07L12EO
WEEKLY INSPECTION TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENT IS NOYDF,IW TRANS-
BE(ORE' INIIPING SIR
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
.PONIED ONTO PURIM RIGHT CF•WAY ADDITIONAL STUN SHALL BE
APPLIED AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. ALl STNMENI tRACKETI. SPRLIA
-
OR WASHED ONTO PUBLIC ROADS SMALL Be REMOVED IMMEOIArELY
SEDIMENT` RArS
SEDIMENT' WALL. TIC RCMnYTV AND tH[ TRAP RESTORED WV TEN ffD1-
UORWAIELY UPON' C111ATIM OF SWALF,S
ON
LNOr ACCUMULATED
AS ACCUWATED WITHIN b OFDHF NY' Of'INC STONE -
Sr'ILJ.WA Y. THE ENTIRE STRUCTIME SPALL M REMOVED AFICR INC
AND PRIOR ID PARR! 00N�N4'IWf71Ar1OYS
ANYRHEHE ON THE SITE.
..
CONSUM'ION SITE HAS WITH PROPERLY STABILIZED. -
J
SILT FEWIT
PERIODIC MSPEC LION SHALL HE NAOF TO INSURE MAY THE SIIT FCNK
BEFORE ENTERING DIL lilt
IS MAINTAINED IN 0000 OPERATING CONDITION. SLDIMENI SNALI. BE'
..REMOVED MEN ACOIMULATION RFAWf:S (REHIALF THE TOTAL NEW)"
OF THE FENCE. SEDIMENT SHALL BE SPREAD OVER STABILIZED. AREAS
R DANGER EXISTS. ..
DONE E NO ACE Of EROSION D C
HA WALL CHECKDAM
WE K Y INSPEC AND F' fR OR R PLAf.EMCNT SHA L BE MADE
F. 1. SEC f1ON. VA L L
' T I. —AND IXTFIS
UPON COAL E IfR OF !
I L
'
RCMRWU WHCN .DE' CON-
STRUCII.Y AS NE MAS BALES SHALL STABILIZED.
SIRIHIYION SITE HAS ALEN PROPihLY STM11:12E0.
IW.[i PRO RCftON
HALES WAIL SICAI I Of VAAS NEE'DE'F BALEE;I.YV RL
P. FROMPTL A AND REPAIR AND Of? IL
PLNJ.'MF.N1 M/ALI BI' LNSTR
'T INJ r 1AI H OASINS
UPON 1XIMPL i R C
REMOVED Al PIE CnNSThNCIION SIR HAS MFN INPNSERLY STAAIl,
CONSTRUCTION SITE
'
IZED..
OPSD{4: SEED,
SL'IGO AREAS SMALL BE MORN AND FCRIILIZED, 11 NECESSARI{' 0
NWIINON SEVEN DAYS Or MMrLETION CF FACI
'"
AND Ml0.CA
INSURE RAPID F-STABLISHMENI AREAS WHICH SHOW SIGNS WARP-
StLN. SIMLI BE RESTED@ IMMEDIATELY AND MAINTAINED UNTIL PER-
RYXW ARIA "
MANENT VEGETATION IS FSrAOLIMKO.
-
$LONE RIP -RAP
RTPMEAP SHALL RE INVrCRO PFRIODICJALLY AN; ADDITIONAL SUNIF
vOuN CLMIrtrmw cj Punt IS
APPLIED AS NECESSARY
6 EROSION CQNTROL MAINTENANCE AND TIME OF PLACEMENT
SURROUND BASIN WITH
.
S1AKC0 HAY BALES
TYPICAL
n
`.._.
T
_.__.. ._. CONCRETE END SCC'TION
-
-
- I.I SLUE STORES
EXCAVATE TEMP PLARV
BASIN AND SFARILIZE
2,
SOC SLOPES WIN
MIRAMAT 1 00
STQRM INLET TEMPOR{�RY_SEf)IMEfVT TRAP
h__
Pm%St title _
BM E(A DO�WL�A/E NpDy
K
USiNE'SS PARK
PIP -RAP WALL BE A WELL (WADED ROCk MIXTURF DOWN TO I INCH SIZE PART)OLEN. SUr.H PIAI 50
PERCENr O. THE MIXTURE BY WEIGHt SHALL. ME LARGER THAN NE LEAST DIMENSION, -
-"
(INCHES).� EEA.97 DIMi_N910N
Hinesburg Road
1.3 E
-17
South Burlington, Vt.
A HELL GRAmD ADC" MINIURC SHALL RE ED AS A MIXWFC NVIFWSFP PRAR IMILY OF PIE LARGEP
NF. STOOUT At M A 9UPFIGIENt MIXitWE OF OTHER SYZFS 0 FILL WE PROGRESSIVELY SbALIElf
$tllet LItIE
RIDS BEIMEEN STORES
S LONE FOR RIP RAP SMALL BE APPROVED; ROUCN, BRDRIN, DUMRK S/OIF WI RH RWEcUtM.FACEO PM-
LUTTINC PLACEMENT IN A TIGHT INTERLOCtMO..MANNER WITH IMF SMALIIEA 5MN!$ FItLIN0-VO1D6 WF lWEEN
LARGER 5R1NF5. IMFSTUN-R5 SNALI. BIT HARM, $dAW, RESI61AN1 To, WA" AETICM, {'AMLYING. ANU
FOR INIF
Erosion DetaiL
SUITABLE. RUE MMPOSF NOI'D.
.Control
'. PrOj.,,t h—b
Project M.D.8ec _.._.. _.._- DI —._: �.._.
AppIOVC
1Q RIP - RAP. _
SIUEWAIX
4TF x
VMS)TIM AND
OFTFC•7ABLE'WARNINO - Iu01 PA 1µµ1
SURFACE
(IACA COAT AND -
CHIC SEAL) (_- . I/7" MAX. REKAL
At END OT
Mo. CURD
I EDGE tN
1 R1fJl1 {Yf-AY
PAVEMENI ... •/
PS WIRE PASSED THROUIYI SECTION
OF GARDEN NOSE to PROR'CI IRON?(
-
B'CEDAR STARES W/CUT NOTCH
A' LAYER SHWOOFD BARA MULCH
BE APPROMED BY LANDSCAPE
ARCMIIECiI
PLANTING MIX
SAUCER RIM
UOSEII, r CUT, AREMOVF BURLAP
`.7xw raIp Or Boor BALL
PLANE TREE At SANE DEPTH AT
j'
WH1CH TREE HAS PREWOU5LY GRDWN
i1111W1
�1 CONIFEROUS TREE
011
-CURS
S TYPICAL DROPPED CURB N,
BIIUM/NOUS-PAVEMENT
...-��, t•r/2,� SURFACE
1. �._...-.....L _ .:. BASE
--.1:0WRVE'CURlr
1�!CLA55B CONCRFIC
-SEE {•iS-i _
M' • ' W - 3 . - >tl' (.RUSHER RIAV MAKE
�� 71" CRAWL BASE.' COURSE'.
ICI Illlv�
MIRAF/ SOOY' JILIIP FABRIC OR1 fl 'JrL lLJ11 IT' I I l+[�
1 \ 1, COMPACT 10 95X sto. PROCTOR
g PAVEMENT AND CURB DETAIL NIS
NOTE: B/REPAM ON VIOMPSON AND
VOWEIOIN STREETS To BE S FEET WIDE.
4 TYPICAL BITUMINOUS BIKEPATH
� aK00'vi
�h
a NOTE At' RUING LAN1: PRESS BRJK:
6R R.0_W
OM USE SVOCRADE UATER/AIS AS SHOWN
AND PROVIOP 2' GRAVEL 5WOLOCRS
(IHOYP_ SON 51CC� R BOROOJN $SPECS) -- ..
_..
;
Q r0' W/DE
1N PLACE 0[ CVNRS
0
1/Tfl LY CASEMENT
( SWffi SNECI EXTENSION J
VAN AND ELEVATION OF
-_ ... .....�! .. ..._....._ ......._..L_._....
.... ._ 12__.
$'
Wit. RY CITY N
AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION, CITY FENGINEER
i
Bi IUMiNW3
1DEWALIT 0' PERMIITCD
�+ --' U71I.I IY rakniDOR
NOTFY:
IR' _
rB BI NNINOrS
1'
1. BASE COURSE TO RI: PLACED FIRST YEAR.
FINISH COURSE TO BE PLACED SECOND YEAR,
SIDEWALK
I-1/I' FINISH TYPE TV
_
-21/2" BASE TYPE IT
2. ALL ROAD MAMRJAI TO RF APPROVED BY THE AYN)X.CT ENGINE FP AlID
_
_6• CRUSREF RON GRAMEI.
CITY ENGINEER PIUOR TO IN$TALLAITON,
TO
APPROVED BY
_
- --------
-14, GRAVEL
--MIRAFI SOON FILTER FABRIC (A 6' SANG CUSHION
0. AIL. UTILITY MANN/AL'; (SIRWWRFS AND PIPES)
PRO Cr ENGINEER AND CITY ENGINEER.
BE
/
_...:p,AONCRETE CVRO. B' MIN,
CCTF.D
10
/
CIJN55PBAGRAVEL BENEARI
RJMiNOUS BIKEPA'IH
/
I/T'/T
. I J,(F'T.
� / arr...wn,wuw.na.+.r!+.v.
�•r.�.�%T'T _...�
M✓^' , r.� 711
/ COMPACT �sus RIDE fi) R5X Sn) ISOCKR,
f.OMPAI
- t, GRAVEL IN 6 10 T LIFTS IO 0.iX SID. PROCTOR
A'IOPSOII• .� - ..
it E:G lN1L, -GABLE, AND 1[l1.PllT)NF IN CLXAIVII
WATER MAIN.. - 2%' '
.. .... -..i : GAS
A' UNDIRORAIN PF'RFORATED PVC A$NFD $IONL 9Ac,U-Yv, -��
WRAPPED IN fll RR FABRIC (MIPAFI NOX) .STORM SCWfR
ME UWf RORA(N SYS/CM INTO STORM BASINS a NOTES --
INN A$ INDICATED BY FNOINEYA) $ m 1 OW SLN SMUT AND BOWUOIN SIWEI ' . ... SANITARY SEWER IS' MIN. COVER TOP OF PIPE,)
(UNOCROPAIN I
IE NOW IS CO'. THE WATER MAIN WILL EK
LOCI No ON P< SAME SIDE of THC ROAD
AS IMF SlovWAIK.
A, SLOPE VARIES "MOON,'BURtINGiON Prt(H`F.RTIE$'
To COWINE GRAOfNO. WITHIN RIGHT-OFNYAY.
%61 SOUTH BURLINGTON ROAD CROSS SECTION
I'I
nt
( lla _ .:� r;tl' !irnillT I[�itf r�l iI n:i
1
It IIr Ill t I JI �I[l �j 1i
)Ill ® {�� Eli � U 11 IIn
11 11 d I 1 i �rF 9 Ir-�Il i K�IEjyL" I �� F,.
se! Ir .f l' I I• 'i" III Irr auC. SEC.�e
_.1 L 1L 911 !1 jL' i L iFl L , �, rt rIa ,tl IEL
FEE.
PRO. PRI. PR1, PR7, I•Rl. PkI S[C.
RIEPHONE CABLE -
- CABLE YARNING TAPE TO RE PLAt1D B' TO 12'
BELOW FJN,$S a. GRADE:
NOTES
' 1: ALL NF."NCNC$-TD BE 24" MINIMUM IN W101H
2. TRENCH CROSS SECTION fO BE IDENTICAL, Kf DR WIRRIUT'Iii,EIMOHY,
JIM
.
X PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CABLES ARE LOCAIEO IN A COMMON PI :NCH,
PK PRIMARY CABLCIS) $MAIk ALWAYS OOCUPY,RF LOWEST POSITIONS.
4, CDNWIT S12ES,
1 Jr'J INGrI PRIMARY LINES ,
3 IR S IP(:N PRIMARY LINES
TF.LF.PNONF 4INOH
CABLE TV 4 INGN
g UNDERGROUND POWER 8 ,TELEPHONE
• - � Nt f001k
FINISH. GRADE..
4U•
' - f,UTOFE LUMINAIRE
GE LUISO W/ 150 WAIT ay.
ALUMINUM TYPE III LAMP
MAST AR41
l - FIBERGLA.S$ LIGHT POLE
IN ED' NOWNAI. MOONING/ MEICHI' SNAKESPEARE
OR EQUAL
WYE: THIS DETAIL WAS
MIOVIVEO BY DM'CITY or
$O111H BURLNOIDK
R rIx t
Ytl DO-
]�MWill
�91 TYPICAL STREET UGHT�.
a TRUDELL
q ;CONSULTING
ENGINEERS,
INC.
14 RIAIT PATk Rod -
Box kOB Wlllllton VC 05495
87D 6311 _
P
Lu
A
d„
r
LU
a _I
1 I�VISE RDAD 9F TJlIN 4tiJ �E Pi I
Desc Iprbn I O to ( Dy
R vlsl I
I
N
FT
Prolece ilea .
n nAlr A Mn\Alt A h(n
Ir! IIFS t I - r,
F J4.
Io
I
{ 17.4
E_ ,59..
f,
r)N15NLd CNADE'_.
1 -45"446' , r
KN I�Ir•ria�4! rIk t,� I
i pe:nnl
( I WEI nCD WING fAOPIC,
11 tYl 1DAL I
-
Y.�,�NON�NHIN4 CRQ11
"II MAx VIA PIPE
[; 1 &i- C AA ,,•VS.. ..
._ 1.
MONOI.IMIC RAyl
Lim,-
.$
..
60TN WAYS , TY'E+7rAL 4' ITT, OPTIONAL
TYPE RER CATCH BASIN N.TS
MALNANAII(t Nfif/I(f
M wiNilk INSIIFDT INLET AND OLIRLi I(M ICE 810CKAOf.
2. PFRIMICAI" p1A1N PONU AND RCMUt!' �EDINENI
(ONCE EN:RY J TD 5 ,EARS)
S.oCLAYLiEbAYS
CLAY CUFF.• LULLED SOIL CLAS5Ir1CAF1(n OF SC OR CL
MOVIDE CERTIFICATION FROM A OUN,FFIED 1ESFINO FIRM
/NA/ MATERIAL ME115 SOIL CLASS SPCCIFIEU.
2. LAN IN 17L1 UNI R:O SUIE L(A9a"ffJCAl1ON OF SM.
PRONOE CERrIFJCAIf(W ROM A WAI tfJf.O Ry,INO rlRu
TNA, NA TFRIAI NEr VS CLA•S !PL(JFICO.
.T. COMPACTION- COMPACT CLAY CORI' 10 W:j
AMU (MI" I'R.I. TO 95R DENSITY STANDARD 11W - CO II.S 1
'CMPACT MATERIALS LN A NAXIMUM (AY
A.
"IT'S
. CNP
FNIY RILE, Y.CIIDN
STONE to ,
JJP.O
WATER El(vA TON �,1y.0 /
2
ZS M( SLOB 10 FkllT
R 7 / " k V II
'
1
• �
`" Il IUY..1
CMI pR (PEP �.
iJl t:l_.
.STORM DRAM ., QALVAN1.tED rA END SECTION
OR�.
• .'. , j r POL.K FHYL(NE END S£CKOV ,
ISN(j1ED GRADE 1U MATCH TAP(REU
/
INLET CONDITION srDEs x END $E6nfM
j
. PRGYM 61 WRTICAt DROP BETWtFN END
.$EC`TIDR MWR1. IDP Of RIPAAP
1Ti
P
ion
-
�' -- INS/ALLp E.ALVANIZFD TOE KATE AS PER
MANDWA9TURENS VFCOICATID"S
I
"
'I,•
I 1
'- STIN4C III PiRM
I v/ ' % (SEE S1TE'PLAN FO9 SPECIFICATIONS)
5" +• �� / - M)RAF) 14QN FABRIC
CMP OR PVC
S DRM DRAM
�e
OUTLET CONDITION �.--
ITk-
u
R IT _ �0.1 -t
_. �•
- I Ifl i i (1�
GALVANIZED METAL END SECTION, ', M,.S
F,g' nAM
LARTH CIEV zY) IS
FI l
.. h, ZI" CUP
1� \
4
--- ANTISE.EP CIKIAR
L .._,,.... ELEV Al D
1 CCW51RUCi7011 NOICS•
1 NEE) WIN THE. EMOD ER IWIOIL EO ANY EARMWJIRK 10 DISCUSS PLANS
2, INSTAI.1 SUFFICIENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURLS TO PRFYENT IRANF`ORE OF
SEDIMENT C', sm,
J EAnAM f PONII 70 5111MAOC ELEYA)!UN AND EONSEPLICr DAM.
EXAVAIFU MAIERIM, MAY ASDIIARLF TOR EAKIN FILL_
4. MIEN EARTH FILL. REACHES ELEVATION 3380 Fx1:AVATE AND
INSrALI OUR.IT PIPE AND CLAY CORE AR(RIND ENTIRE PERIMEILR Or POND
5 COMPLETE EARN FILL AND STASIL)IF SLOPE'S BY SE'I,OINC AMC MIR.Cn1W..
8. INS FALL. S)ONr
COLFINUC, DURING I.D. FLOW CONDITIONS.
_ CLIP,
(.No SECTION
WILE 1
I
SUI+F,,vM6 BASIN W1IN / -
3,Akm HATBALES.
/
II \N,
/� T ExrnvA r ,
//fr / :..'�ay, -t �,• '.gAENdI M.1Lr,!1
j _. 5LGI Fr WJn1
x/ � / ' �. IEiRAUA(. Ra)
' COTISIRUCTFON SPECIFICATIONS FOR a THE 51RIA`.TIRF Sungl. RE iNSPPCRD III!:a LM FAIN tKN, AND
TEMPORARY 'TOFU MI. T SEDIMENT 1RM.5 EMPNA S E
NEl gIRB' MAb[I AS NEEDED., AF AC Y n1AL1. RF RfMOIND FR01d illf"
I MF SEOIMENr TRAP SNAIL IC CONSTRUCTED BY EACAVATINO A MA WNFN WIE OAIERIAt VAS ACCIINUI.AIEU IO WIITNN 4" r✓ rHf'.
IFMPORARY BASIN ADJACENT TO THE STORM INLET. IHE RASIN 10, SrolwVI.IH�TI:i OF VREA6 OWR'S,ABR-Pt-9 AREAS ON
,FIALI 14AVF A VINIMOM VERM OF TIM) FEEI M(A4.IPE) FROM RIF SL fS LESS THAN 4�„ ANIT If NECESSARY, SLEMUD M[" GRASS rO
OOr— OF „IE SIORN IMF, . wl SLOPES SIIAII BE I:I OR - rRF.NMT'[RW/ON .., -
FI.AIRR — S1ABIl IZED MI RI. MT Re MAT LAG! TO PFEY£N1 EROSION.
1 Ihi R:NPDPARY BASIN, 'A TALI RF RAGA11LLfD AND SPADTLIjID KITH
2. INIET PROTECTION SHALL RE PROWLIEV 6v *RAPPING FILTER FABRIC GRAS5 11P(uJ APPROVAI 111. 111E'11111 LFN. T1LL,MAILRIA!::u11AII 11
(.IRA" 140) OKR NE OPENING AND UTILIZING NAMALES F(M FPFL OF' ROdiJ OA )iMFR ADDD4Ef.E,A T10N A4 ME'lL AS OW ;IZIn
SUPPl81T. Srpry♦! AND gGCTfS.
STORM INLET TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP'
r4`� STORM WATER! POND #Z, DAM a OUTLET SECTION
cuy JJe D
4' STONC 3/4' STIFF 7
N MAL _WATER ELEVAr1ON
8" STONE - 2" TO 4" IN S17F. / •`--_Y/ -{� 'S ••
LLCV J32.0-
`Y
- NAryW SOLI, '
,
M)RAFI 110 OR FOUR
r5"'\ STORMWATER POND •2 BOTTOM
uarN,lr,
. - -..�. CIRICRAEM p' RMO n ROAD SE
NAr£RI.IN S
•.
-
FO' v 46•'A.
CCkRUW/TONS -
AND
AND CND ND SECTITI0 ONS.
S
J III". C.RANLAAR RACRPILL (SAND)
t
' En•� COMPACTED IN 1* WIS
77$ to95X OCHS"
SID. PROCTOR 71.51
JE
•''
1 - IUD. • _i BANK RUV CHA W'L
C'OMPACIED
1j` EL• ,,..: },a. N 01
11 � U ii %'�'y+ /;J..: A 0 ri LIFTS M 94R
s ro..
*h.�nEW
JU to, 11
pgpq Y+RUCION
`j1 i
{0 -
' f C 1`Aet ilE 1M ENOINEOI REFURC IN9TMAAITDN YET n1 h
PRGC,JV AND'EAOSWN'CONIROL NEN .'
2. TILL MA,FBIA 11N4ER NAUNCHES AN6 A cull-P1PES'S IAI L
RF. PLACED IN ae LAIFltS ON YrO D'I SIDES LX' TIE PIPE ,•`
ACED
NE'SAto EL[V'T`ION AMA TI7NHED ^OI
A COMPACTION. 15FdIMd R� L11Rff FD OY FIE ENGINEER
1.IN51ALIA/rON 1'O. AF DD+/r bNRLNG-10Y RFAU 110W5.
-
/-7-V SECTION OF GO'^ x' 4G P4E ARCH Nor t
MA,s
I
p Ae
aR x�;FY
TRUDELL
CONSULTING
ENGINEERS, INC.
14 D,BI
Box .108 WIIIISton, Vt. '.• 05495 (802) 879.685
Uj
C7
co
W.
4L1d
%7
/ DescrlpHon
EIRte By
1
Revlsfons
., ti �04 ✓Ci' � I i
�~1
project title
MEADOWLAND
BUSINESS,PARK,
Hinesburg Road
South Burlington, Vt.
Sheet title
Stormwater )details
r10ject r,U,, -. - Ex,
rr Dll:Ct man ¢e _ D Tw ,
ApprovedvA+6�.C1[G/.SC�`1�'�1-9 ;
V I ,
S
P9
°.
PAPA
x
/N 1'£AC •vi'e
....._. V . /` e:' �Tdu I o'aaC s } r y*J' Wx •y
f Jfy VINV NO (Nl ig 0 YZd �' / , y y W / UNNsixf •, }{ i � f rJ' .
0NV 1JAi}?"W` 71.lViAi' ; -.,:x 1 • _ 1 . fr �. aoaJ 8F ` t tis
=Rn
N3dO 0NY 14011YAW i10 ,DO!
G lac � nGz+
stndual.r = QS 0 1 $ s,,�u j _yn uz----'.A.ra - ---- su9aVVW a.rawrtoa sa)mrmR L:r�Nr%>a 1
eb.:_..�.-U*ly **lo-,i
,.e.. t...-,.�--•--•----- 1N9Nr1�!)v3d � i • �, _ �� o r Rn �aa r � � # -�
/ A
//�-�.y NIV3lll5 q.iOd0lk9.-.........., 1 // , 'T d rM:lnr �, / ,v1�dY -' p •."
I ( xx
•4. Lida (Zbl "{y
y�yy�rq�
tiue+L '.Gi�.{C= r.4y �" - - .._ '.-:..��... � ^:� s. r: �' , i'"�"+�vt �'�' �,H. ,.�. `".'' 1 ,�yJ7' $+� �•
`u
,.w
h"
¢jlSi iA4xi�ld �� l I-� 1 r'.�'r ,Sf� �' �_-1-•y'G•—'.�.•%'`�...�_� ... _.--�• `�`;}-^,-"'-e'---_._r/ � �'T ',.. .::�- _a:� �1y•. h` I �. `� ,
- - :., ,zi / ....- I �--._ __...___--_-��Nve. .___ ._ �_.r_.,_..____-_._ _•' �`} 16au t, _ 9o'((YY".e7p 1
`'MAI-1h FIF:: _1 ar. gQ4 ` S. •.
tN31Y3Sd.•i : � •x :i . j(� 'I �E---__-_—_ - •� ovW' •t�v 1... • _ 1 _ . , .. -. - ' 1
•
^ i
1 vV�� pp 4 x w v v wYdpNOLEMX M
�r7 �a'aaaa'`�.,.. � '... "NGl(W,tNd5i(Y�'.rh. _...._�% •./ r 1 � (rnwi'�n.'isorn
,
i..l } J ! 71NBri N)1 vi -` 3M NO 03MAN30 36 Ot
VOK SM NVA81S30d
/ E
30Nf .OY 0350d02k1
'aBF� i1� � � / � I � Nj1 Fa!' ! yP I •. B _ _'._.._..-} Jo+'*'• � '
v: 1
r l
1 • it 1 , (,,. L .._.y.. .. -a3,v �oru.rsl t
,CZ.LS.C9 N
ip
tt6 j dY>SQ � t7VlN11J+ ��� I � i / ,f k ). � I
.IT <s/cI �BG ANYyrxn elrquxel PWivar..'�ii r �'•'.. - '.
dCyr 1
fl9-"..v vIs LY 9Nfl A01..
. �. � (�- j. � � ' .+�'1"•µI SL.J.a52( NI )rA"I 9EVii
C!) m
1 r '
0 n � 4rct... I
f 1
ITCCg
II^^ T
W - ■ • • BNk131N LN71ii`Y) N R B CL^,01 LL MOT.VJINO'kaYB %nYB tl5 ,
' � I' 1' ^,...;...^'•'^'. "•"'�. *^� ~ . i � l r ...-__.�L � — t Us N .JI-.B Or. 3NI4 Ikl A R(41QYx6 Blurb YRJ
we to •.S L9 )19p .iNNA Slreogt4 S,MId Vw
1 rJ/{I � �' � k G ryL ,Bl ANYiNNFi YMRYaa %)Y
OC Jf y.
�, I ` I I' - q �Il W) •( '.Z Otiv IXIfWUUa WA"Mm Y`,
SLNONNOa )lrt: uLLNv'N! "VN NannOu 9NYN ,NAl1N30S A3N
.11 .vAfld�'tk ' 1-1�01NV110 hGN 3H1 U1 fl11Y.X5'19d JdTM'GNVT1 +Y13N1 NOItW19m, .
RbdUrW 3N1 , 3 NMF1M16 b, fuvd 3H1 m3dpi� u1 lhu
AS NARMV1430N(1 U9ION TIUA O> UVd NC7t VOW12M JO NpWOMIGN[)A
I
� 1
f y A �Jad E x Iba •r"