Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-04-61 SD-04-64 - Supplemental - 0596 Meadowland DriveTransmittal Cover Sheet Detailed, Grouped by Each Transmittal Number N\ E A G L E iY U �C H A 5 E� CON 5 R U C T I O N C O P A N Y Meadowland Business Park Project # 439 Neagley & Chase Construction 1150 Airport Drive Tel: 802-658-6320 Fax: 802-658-0349 PO Box 1150 South Burlington, VT 05407-2283 D. 164 0064 Ray Belair South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel: 802/846-4106 Fax: ❑ Acknowledgement Required Review 001 1.00 Drawing 002 1.00 Drawing Irene Daigle, Office Manager Neagley & Chase Construction Co., Inc. 1150 Airport Drive PO Box 2283 South Burlington, VT 05407-2283 Tel: 802-658-6320 Fax:802-658-0349 Hand PUD Plat New Worksheet New Ray: Above is sent at the request of Mark Neagley, for your review. Irene Daigle Prolog Manager Signature Printed on: 11/15/2004 PM6Database J kty Signed Date Page 1 DUAL OBLIGEE RIDER TO PERFORMANCE BOND Bond 6102260 WHEREAS, Heretofore, on or about the \ 0L>— day of ,&9-r&xA-Q 0C.- , m2001 , Munson Earth -Moving Corporation, unpike goad, Williston, VT 05495, hereinafter referred to as Principal, ontered into a written agreement with Summer/Ice Joint Venture, Inc., Burlington, , hereinafter referred to as Original Obliges, for the construction of Road at Meadow and Business Park in South Burlington, VT , and WHEREAS, the Principal and the GENERAL Insurance Company of Amer", a Washington Corporation, as Surety, executed and delivered to the Original Obligee their joint and several Performance Bond, and WHEREAS, The City of South Burlington, Vermont , hereinafter referred to as Additional Obligee, has requested the Principal and Surety to join with the Original Obligea in the execution and delivery of this Rider, end the Principal and Surety have agreed so to do upon the conditions herein stated. NOW THEREFORE, in cor�rideration of one dollar and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, the undersigned agree that the said Performance Bond shall be, and is, amended as follows: 1. The name of The City of South Burlington, Vermont _ as Additional Obligee, shall be added to sal nd as a naro o ,gee. 2. The rights of Additional Obligee as a named Obligee shall be subject to the condition preeodent that the Original Obligee's obligations under the contract be performed, 3. The aggregate liability of the Surety under said bond to the Original Obligee and Additional Obligea, as their interests may appear, is limited to the penal sum of the said bond. 4. The Surety, as its option, may make any payment under said bond by check issuod jointly to the Original Obligee and Additional Obligee, S. The purpose of this Rider is to add an Additional Obligee only and is not intended to affect or alter the terms and conditions of this bond. Signed, sealed and dated this to day of , 1% 20QJ S r/Ic J ttent e nc. (Seal if corporation) By: Attest Or inal Obligee By (Seal if corporation) Attest ILCM0 is •A1WT[--u.•s-- C By y GEN hSURAN CO ANY OF AMERICA M11 i alit Vex Planck, t -in-Fact rth-MovKq Covilv ati Q Reg;sterel Ttaoern8n of SAPtCO Corporation S-21e5rED 7/flf P?90 1 of 2 PRINTED IN U.S.A. PLRFORMANCE BOkD Conforms with The American Institute of Architects Bond # 610MO AIA Document A312 Any singular reference to Contractor, Suety, Owner or other party shall be considered plural where applicable. CONTRACTOR (Name and Address): MUNSON EARTH -MOVING CORPORATION 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 OWNER (Name and Address); SUMMER/ICE JOINT VENTURE, INC. 1150 Airport Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 CONSTRUCTION CON- RACT SL'RETY (Name and Principal Place of Business). - GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA MILI,ENIUM CORPORATE PARK BLDG. C 18400 NE UNION HILL ROAD REDMONTD, WA 98052 Date: Amount. ($1,694,726.00)-One Million Six Hundred Ninety Four Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty Six Dollars & No/100ths Description (Name and Location): Construction of road at Meadowland Business Park in South Burlington, Vermont BO:vTI) Date (Not earlier than Construction Contract Date): Amount: ($1,694,726.00)-One Million Six Hundred Ninety Four Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty Six Dollars & No/100ths Modifications to this Bond: ® None ❑ See Page 2 CONTRACTO P CIPAL SURETY Company: M RTH-MOV rporare Sea]) G RAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AIvIERICA .P ION (Seal) :Fame and0ritle: � 0. 0,, (Any additional signatuu:es appear page 2.) (FOR IIdFOR* SATION ONLY - Name, Address and Telephone) AGENT or BROKER - THE ROWLEY AGENCY, INC. P.O. Box 511, Concord, NH 03302-0511 1 The Contractor and the Surety, jointly and severally, bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns to the Owner for the performance of the Construction Contract, which is incorporated herein by reference. 2 If the Contractor performs the Construction Contract, the Surety and the Contractor shall have no obligation under this Bond, except to participate in conferences as provided in Subparagraph 3.1. 3 If there is no Owner Default, the Surety's obligation under this Bond shall arise after: 3.1 The Owner has notified tlx Contractor and the Surety at its address described in Paragraph 10 below that the Owner is considering declaring a Contractor Default and has requested and attempted to arrange a conference with the Contractor and the Surety to be held not later than fifteen days after receipt of such notice to discuss methods of performing the Construction Contract. If the Owner, the Contractor and the Surety agree, the Contractor shall be allowed a reasonable time to. Name and Title: VIAliam Vet'Planck, Attorney -In -Fact OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE (Architect, Engineer or other ply): perform the Construction Contract, but such an agreement shall not waive the Owner's right, if any, subsequently to declare a Contractor Default; and 3.2 The Owner has declared a Contractor Default and formally terminated the Contractor's right to complete the contract. Such Contractor Default shall not be declared earlier than twenty days after the Contractor and the Surety have received notice as provided in Subparagraph 3.1; and 3.3 The Owncr has agreed to pay the Balance of the Contract Price to the Surety in accordance with the terms of the Construction Contract or to a contractor selected to perform the Construction Contract in accordance with the terms of the contract with the Owner. 4 When the Owner has satisfied the conditions of Paragraph 3, The Surety shall promptly and at the Surety's expense take one of the following actions: S•1859/GIEF 10r99 Page 1 of 2 4.1 Arrange for the Contractor, with--nseni of the Owner, to perform and complete the Constructioi atract; or 4.2 Undertake to perform and complete the Construction contract itself, through its agents or through independent contractors; or 4.3 Obtain bids or negotiated proposals from qualified contractors acceptable to the Owner for a contract for performance and completion of the Construction Contract, arrange for a contract to be prepared for execution by the Owner and the contractor selected with the Owner's concurrence, to be secured with performance and payment bonds executed by a qualified surety equivalent to the bonds issued on the Construction Contract, and pay to the Owner the amount of damages as described in Paragraph 6 in excess of the Balance of the Contract Price incurred by the Owner resulting from the Contractor's default; or 4.4 Waive its right to perform and complete, arrange for completion, or obtain a new contractor and with reasonable promptness under the circumstances: 1 After investigation, determine the amount for which it may be liable to the Owner and, as soon as practicable after the amount is determined, tender payarent therefor to the Owner; or 2 Deny liability in whole or in part and notify the Owner citing reasons therefor. 5 If the Surety does not proceed as provided in Paragraph 4 with reasonable promptness, the Surety shall be deemed to be in default on this Bond fifteen days after receipt of an additional written notice from the Owner to the Surety demanding that the Surety perform its obligations under this Bond, and the Owner shall be entitled to enforce any remedy available to the Owner. If the Surety procccds as provided in Subparagraph 4.4, and the Owner refuses the payment tendered or the Surety has denied liability, in whole or in part, without further notice the Owner shall be entitled to enforce any remedy available to the Owner. 6 After the Owner has terminated the Contractor's right to complete the Construction Contract, and if the Surety elects to act under Subparagraph 4.1, 4.2, or 4.3 above, then the responsibilities of the Surety to the Owvcr shall not be greater than those of the Contractor under the Construction Contract, and the responsibilities of the Owner to the Surety shall not be greater than those of the Owner tinder the Construction Contract. To the limit of the amount of this Bond, but subject to corrunitment by the Owner of the Balance of the Contract Price to mitigation of costs and damages on the Construction Contract, the Surety is obligated without duplication for: 6.1 The responsibilities of the Contractor for correction of defective work and completion of the Construction Contract; 6.2 Additional legal, design professional and delay costs resulting from the Contractor's Default, and resulting from the actions or failure to act of the Surety under Paragraph 4; and 6.3 Liquidated damages, or if no liquidated damages are specified in the Construction Contract, actual damages caused by delayed performance or non-performance of the Contractor. MODIFICATIONS TO THIS BOND ARE AS FOLLOWS: 7 The Surety shall -t be liable to the Owner or others for obligations of the Cora! or that are unrelated to the Construction Contract, and the Balance of the Contract Price shall not be reduced or set off on account of any such unrelated obligations. No right of action shall accrue on this Bond to any person or entity other than the Owner or its heirs, executors, administrators or successors. 8 The Surety hereby waives notice of any change, including changes of time, to the Construction Contract or to related subcontracts, purchase orders and other obligations. 9 Any proceeding, legal or equitable, under this Bond may be instituted in any court of competent jurisdiction in the location in which the work or part of the work is located and shall be instituted within two years after Contractor Default or within two years after the Contractor ceased working or within two years after the Surety refuses or fails to perform its obligations under this Bond, whichever occurs first. If the provisions of this Paragraph are void or prohibited by law, the minimum period of limitation available to sureties as a defense in the jurisdiction of the suit shall be applicable. 10 Notice to the Surety, the Owner or the Contractor shall be mailed or delivered to the address shown on the signature page. 11 When this Bond has been furnished to comply with a statutory or other legal requirement in the location where the construction was to be performed, any provision in this Bond conflicting with said statutory or legal requirement shall be deemed deleted herefrom and provisions conforming to such statutory or other legal requirement shall be deemed incorporated herein. The intent is that this Bond shall be construed as a statutory bond and not as a common law bond. 12 DEFINITIONS 12.1 Balance of the Contract Price: The total amount payable by the Owner to the Contractor under the Construction Contract after all proper adjustments have been made, including allowance to the Contractor of any amounts received or to be received by the Owner in settlement of insurance or other claims for damages to which the Contractor is entitled, reduced by all valid and proper payments made to or on behalf of the Contractor under the Construction Contract. 8-16591GIEF 10/99 Page 2 of 2 12.2 Construction Contract The agreement between the Owner and the Contractor identified on the signature page, including all Contract Documents and changes thereto. 12.3 Contractor Default: Failure of the Contractor, which has neither been remedied nor waived, to perform or otherwise to comply with the terms of the Construction. Contract. 12.4 Owner Default: Failure of the Owner, which has neither been remedied nor waived, to pay the Contractor as required by the Construction Contract or to perform and complete or comply with the other terms thereof. W S A F EC 0-1 POWER OF ATTORNEY SAFFr'r) INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA GEJ . INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA HQPM- .r-FICE: SAFECO PLAZA SEAME, WASHINGTON 9i185 No. 9595 KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: That SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, each a Washington corporation, does each hereby appoint ....... a. 11'DANIF_L E. CHURCH; PAULA J. CA-N•TARk JOHN P. TMSfENY; 1t'II„LL10,I vER PLANCY, REONDA J. CONNOR; Concord, New 11vqbim .........� ••• its true and lawful attomey(s)•in `act, 0t full authority to exeate on its behalf fidelity and surety bonds or undertakings and other documents of a similar character issued in the course of Rs business, and to bind the respe,-Ve company thereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA have each executed and attested these presents this I ]ih R.A. PIERSON, SECRETARY CERTIFICATE day of May 1999 V1 g&4wo W. RANDALL STODDARD. PRESIDENT Extract from the By -Laws of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and of GENERAL_ INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA: -Article V, Section 13. - FIDELITY AND SURETY BONDS ... the President, any Vice President, the Secretary, and any Assistant Vice President eppohted for that purpose by the officer in charge of surety operations, shag each have authority to appoint individuals as attorneys -In fact or under other appropriate titles with authority to execute on behalf of the company fidelity aril surety bonds and other documents of simllar character issued by the company in the course of its business... On any instrument making or evidencing such appointment, ttv signatures may be affxed by facsimile. On any Instrument conferring such authority or on any bond or undertaking of the company, the sea!, or a facsimile thereof, may be Impressed or affixed or In any other manner reproduced; provided, however, that the seal shag not be necessary to the validity of any such instrument or undertaking.' Extract from a Resolution of the Board of Directors of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA adopted July 28, 1970. "On any certificate executed by the Secretary oran ass'�ant secretary of the Company setting out, (i) The provisions of Article V, Section 13 of the By -Laws, and 01") A copy of the powerofattomey appointment, executed pursuant thereto, and (in) Certifying that said power-6"nomey appointment is in full force and effect. the signature of the certifying officer may be by facsimile, and the seal of the Company may be a facsimile thereof." I, R.A. Pierson, Secretary of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and of C-ENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, do hereby certify that the foregoing extracts of the By -Laws and of a Resolution of the Board of Directors cf these corporations, and or a Power of Attorney issued pursuant thereto, are true and correct, and that both the By-t-aws, the Resolution and the Power of Attorney are still in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 twve hereunto set MY hand and affixed the facsimiie seal of said corporation SEAL dui 1953 S-097USAEF 7M this day of .n ptarber 2001 =EA L 00f W �''t�' R.A. PIERSON, SECRETARY ® Registered trademark of SAFECO Corporation. 511 im POF Bond No SK3978 LANDSCAPING BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT, NeWley & Chase Construction Company , as Principal, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of South Burlington as Obligee, in the full and just sum of FoM-Seven Thousand Four Hundred and 00/100----- Dollars for the payment of which sum, well and truly to be made, the said Principal and Surety bind themselves, and their respective heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the Principal has contracted to construct specified landscaping at Meadowland Business Park as described in the specifications. And, Whereas, Principal is required to provide security in the amount of For y-Seven Thousand, Four Hundred and 00/100------------------------------------------------------------------- DOLLARS ($47,400.00). as performance guarantee that such work will be performed in accordance with the Site Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that, if Principal shall faithfully perform such work in accordance with the aforementioned Site Plan, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect for a period of three years from September A 2001 thru September 16, 2004 Signed, sealed, and dated this 10th day of September , 2001 Witness: Witness: Neagley & Chase Construction Co. By (Seal) St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company ORA. ME ell I W Scott F. Boardman Attorney -in -Fact TheStftl POWER OF ATTORNEY Seaboard Surety Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company Power of Attorney No. 22680 United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. Certificate No. 9 19 8 5 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Seaboard Surety Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York, and that St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company are corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Iowa, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin (herein collectively called the "Companies"), and that the Companies do hereby make, constitute and appoint I. Munn Boardman, III, Richard S. Smith, Scott F. Boardman, Paul E. Plunkett, D. Michael Boardman and Brenda Schill Burlington Vermont of the City of State _ their true and lawful Attomey(s)-in-Fact, each in their separate capacity if inure than one is named above, to sign its name as surety to, and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, undertakings, contracts and other written instruments in the nature thereof on behalf of the Companies in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons, guaranteeing the performance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings required or permitted in any actions or proceedings allowed by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused this instrument to be signed and sealed this 9th day of August 2001 Seaboard Surety Company United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company SDFFIY k �„N,IMJ•G9 p!;'xs�yq 4�,�StY,QyD C p�tTY�'O? !' ��Zr��� * j i P pOR Cd�l\lE �it0 ry Aif.�, Z cOp Alf:,., �i � per,,,,_ MCQQ�D�i1iED N�192 � �O ;SEAL o'J �d.:SBaiLj� ` N1.8-9^6Nep � 19%% � � 1951 t I OFPfcW fS * f• afaw A� t� ... �,. �,�� Att�dF 'a/i tt� ''��/f/ r f IOYw.eP/, C , State of Maryland City of Baltimore THOMAS E. HUIBREGTSE, Assistant Secretary On this 9th day of August 2001 before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared John F. Phinney and Thomas E. Huibregtse, who acknowledged themselves to be the Vice President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of Seaboard Surety Company, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.; and that the seals affixed to the foregoing instrument are the corporate seals of said Companies; and that they, as such, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained by signing the names of the corporations by themselves as duly authorized officers. EAAfor In Witness Whereof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. m pV SS e(!Q i My Commission expires the 13th day of July, 2002. � 9E CiTV REBECCA EASLEY-ONOKALA, Notary Public 86203 Rev. 7-2000 Printed in U.S.A. This Power of Attorney is granted under and by the authority of the following resolutions adopted by the Boards of Directors of Seaboard Surety Comp St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty ompany, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. on September 2, 1998, which resolutions are now in full force and effect, reading as follows: RESOLVED, that in connection with the fidelity and surety insurance business of the Company, all bonds, undertakings, contracts and other instruments relating to said business may be signed, executed, and acknowledged by persons or entities appointed as Attomey(s)-in-Fact pursuant to a Power of Attorney issued in accordance with these resolutions. Said Power(s) of Attorney for and on behalf of the Company may and shall be executed in the name and on behalf of the Company, either by the Chairman, or the President, or any Vice President, or an Assistant Vice President, jointly with the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary, under their respective designations. The signature of such officers may be engraved, printed or lithographed. The signature of each of the foregoing officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any Power of Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Attomey(s)-in-Fact for purposes only of executing and attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and subject to any limitations set forth therein, any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company, and any such power so exe- cuted and certified by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is validly attached; and RESOLVED FURTHER, that Attomey(s)-in-Fact shall have the power and authority, and, in any case, subject to the terms and limitations of the Power of Attorney issued them, to execute and deliver on behalf of the Company and to attach the seal of the Company to any and all bonds and undertakings, and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such instrument executed by such Attomey(s)-in-Fact shall be as binding upon the Company as if signed by an Executive Officer and sealed and attested to by the Secretary of the Company. I, Thomas E. Huibregtse, Assistant Secretary of Seaboard Surety Company, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Power of Attorney executed by said Companies, which is in full force and effect and has not been revoked. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand this 11 th day of September 2001 Thomas E. Hu�tbre.�g!/t(s�e/' �, Assistant Secretary O /�.QQ To verify the authenticity of this Power of Attorney, call 1-800-421-3880 and ask for the Power of Attorney clerk. Please refer to the Power of Attorney number, the above -named individuals and the details of the bond to which, the power is attached. C CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PI ANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 20, 2005 Ian Jewkes Krebs & Lansing . 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings Dear Mr. Jewkes: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the February 15, 2005 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy' nou h Y g Administrative Assistant Encl. i ( Lam (jj.r � Ca DEVELOPMENT RENEW BOARD 15 FEBRUARY 2005 Mr. Belair suggested continuing the hearing and letting the applicant revise the plan so the DRB knows what it is approving. Mr. Boucher moved to continue Site Plan Application #SP-05-01 of Friendly Ice Cream Corp. until 1 March 2005. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6 Public Hearing: Reconsider preliminary plat application #SD-04-61 and final plat application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings for a planned unit development consisting of. 1) construction of a 26,000 sq. ft. distribution and related storage building with more than 15% GFA in office use for the same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no - construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south located at the end of Dubois Drive: Mr. Dinklage noted receipt of a letter from the applicant's attorney asking for a continuance due to legal issues. Mr. Boucher moved to continue reconsideration of Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04- 61 and Final Plat Application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings until 5 April 2005. Mr. Kupferman seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Continued sketch plan application #SD-04-90 of Diemer Properties, LLC for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing a 16 room motel and single family dwelling, 2) constructing a 6000 sq. ft. retail/office building, and 3) constructing a 14 unit multi -family dwelling, 490 Shelburne Road: Mr. Llewellyn noted that the Board had requested that there be only one curb cut on Bacon Street, and that has been dgne.. The building would be a "pass -through" building with parking underneath to serve the residential use. The other parking lot will serve the retail. They may come back with a shared parking request, depending on the use of the building. Mr. Llewellyn showed the location of landscaping. There is a question of Bacon Street becoming a public street. Mr. Robertson explained this is an Act 250 issue. Eric Farrell has said he would address this in a few weeks. Mr. Kupferman asked about the rear yard setback. Mr. Belair said there are 2 front yard setbacks and 2 side yard setbacks. Mr. Dinklage noted the applicant is committing to building essentially what has been shown. He asked them to make the ends of the building nice looking because they will be visible from Shelburne Road. -3- i CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO t 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 1, 2005 Ian Jewkes Krebs cis Lansing 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings Dear Mr. Jewkes: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, April 5, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 To- South Burlington Development Review Board From: Brian Robertson, Associate Planner y r Date: April 1, 2005 Agenda #3, CU-04-15, Garret and Lisa Huyer Staff has not received any additional information for this project since the original meeting. If no additional information is submitted by the meeting on April 5, 2005, staff recommends denying this application. Agenda #4, VR-04-02, George Hubbard The applicant has requested a continuation of this application to a future date. Staff suggests that the Development Review Board continue this application to the May 3, 2005 meeting. Agenda #5, SP-05-01, Friendly Ice Cream Corporation Staff has not received any additional information for this project since the original meeting. If no additional information is submitted by the meeting on April 5, 2005, staff recommends denying this application. Agenda #6, SD-04-61 and SD-04-64, Spencer Terminal Holdings Staff has been in contact with the applicant regarding this project, and it appears that the applicant will be withdrawing its request for reconsideration of the original approval. Enclosed is a confidential letter from the City Attorney regarding this request for reconsideration. AFr-05-20015 Lo.01 ,i; 43l_E Q:CD-ASE 80265, ph*&.: (802) 8784375 iax(BO'Z}898-96T � MEMORANDUM: Datc. April 5, 2003 From: Ian A. 1eu-kes To: Ray Helair City of South Burlington Re: Notice of Withdrawal of Application: Spea-,er Termiral Holdings Approval SD-04-61 and SD-04-64 Meadowland 1ndustrW Park Summer Ice and Dubois Property South Burlington, Vermont Dear Ray: We are writing to officially wiOdraw our application for tix above referenced matter. Both dark Neagley, of Summer Ice Joint Venture, and Bill Spencer, of Spencer Terminal holdings, are signing this memorandum to acknowledge their concurrence. Thank you, }mot A. lowing x IWO van tors xt�uasl �aldmgr 7iJ-NL F.Clt- APR-05-2005 16-'01 / UEAGLEY&CHASE CONSTR ,502~580349 P.01-'02 t N It A G L E Y a H A 3 t GO�TIOIt COY AwY FAX TO: ' ' t �C �tK Fax: S ��in ' G i FROM: i u% c i�t S� _ [8021658-6320 Ext. i `t� {VOICE] 1802165&0349 (FAX] RE REMARKS: D veme— 4-01� P.O. Box 2283. South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2283 PAGES WILL FOLLOW THIS PAGE... STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119 PATTI R. PAGE* WRITER'S E-MAIL(ALAFFERTY@FIRMSPF.COM) ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-2552 JOSEPH S. McLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE AMANDA S. E. LAFFERTY (*ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y) April 7, 2005 Jacalyn Stevens, Clerk Environmental Court 2418 Airport Road Barre, VT 05641-8701 Re: Appeal of Greco Docket No. 12-1-05 Vtec Dear Jackie: JILL E. SPINELLI WILL S. BAKER In connection with the above -referenced matter, enclosed please find the Notice of Withdrawal of the applications that are the subject of this appeal. Please call with questions. Thank you. Sincerely, vvl'ovvl Amanda S. E. ASEL/br son5676.cor Enclosure CC: Raymond Belair/ Joseph and Mary Greco David and Heather Main Kenneth W. and Joanne Perkins Peter E. and Leslie Black Plumeau Paul and Cheryl Houchens Donna Lee Diane Naomi Roen A Laffert 30��5e07 49 F E_' ' co i�A1t�CSW.L� t vl--vu MEMORANDUM - Date: April 5, 2003 From: Ian A. lewkes To: Ray Heiair City of South Bu:ling-ton Re: Notice of Withdrawal of Application: Speaucr Terminal Holdiogs Approval SD-04-61 and SD-04-64 Meadowland lndusniai Park Surnmer Ice and Dubois Property South Burlington, Vermont Dear Ray We are writing to officially withdraw our application for the above referenced matter, Both IMAr1 Neagley, of Sltianner Ice joint ;V entux, aria Dui Spciicez' of SSPcn=r Tu—.-i=1 HcO.-d fiS, ."tire sibui.^.�,' rhi5 memorandum to acknowledge their concurrence, Thank you, 1= 7e4=5 I=JoiO Vu:t= T07PL P.0 3 SWI�SEttYM'FIAW'-----�� i M SPENCER TERMINAL Corporate Headquarters SOUTH B URLING TON, VERMONT INDEX.- Sheet SP-1 Site Plan Sheet SP-2 Utility Plan Sheet SP-3 Grading Plan Sheet SP-4 Landscape Plan Sheet SP-5 Lighting Plan Sheet A-1 Elevations Sheet D-1 Details Sheet D-2 Details Sheet D-3 Details RECEIVED AUG 12 2%g'! City of So. Burlington AvN "Y 74 1QN P-ftcr asaze ....... AR -PBS & zd/ysmC 164 Alain Street Consultzng_ Colchester Engineers Inc. Vermont 05446 849.e-87B-9975 -- I � 1 Delr/oPmen4 LTD. - - I p� Lot 7 _ 1 9 I or I", ,foktt Venture _ - - -----, —. _ ' SIM // ,�--wee 6 PAC •e= 1 -- °- - - - _ — — �---- - 1 �aras 1 36 459, ._---- — Ste_ �- Fxtenstan W I yyt/t Shad --8- -- -. N/i O— Acn+4 /nc -�'. d ` zoo p .,• .Lggi---------------- (...— -y------ ------ ---` 1 Lot 2 IA Munson Earth ! 't 47 1 Is � � S)'7E proposed Location Mao w 1 a= t PJ4 1 1 le.f. nM .A W� l71meY /nfwmot/on: � So \ Summer /ce ✓o/nt Ventura •I e 153 Summit Street South Burtkigtan, VT 05404 Nyf= (802)-658-6320 1 6hw Aa'sx /x AOD/katt /nfh7wtkvL Co-AMIko7t /nfumotAw 1 Spencer Term/nof Holdings, L.L.C. Homer & Marie Dubois I l S �1: O P� ♦/O. Box 50JAmC Swth Buq m, Vr 05403 - ( *Yli ton, VT 05495 (801)-862-8687 N 1 I �•� ( (802)-663-5062 ♦♦ Summer /ce ✓tre Venture Lot 3 153 Summit 1 1 _, �_,,._.�- -+ �1 �.•�,♦ \` i t-, Summer /ce Joint Ventut'e a1 ,ry ai�a � � � � ♦ ` Areo=20.2 acres South Budmgto2 12o10' (802)-658-6320 �I 7 �A 1 /ndustMW and Open, Spaoe -7-,hg District g 1 �.� . Arras: Total oma = 20.2 acres Q �------ �, Proposed Lot tbmmy - Lot S1.• ahw i wame New Bu//dmgs 26; 000 a em-. ` 29.5 �. New �Parking & Roods = rzgzae ,r. = 14.7T emaiz ,� _A zacw ,t rzazae et 1 Toto/Cowroge + eraa,z ,t = 17.6R 1 L Front Yord Coverage - 3.7M ��� t. a5 %ice sq.5O o13a gyp— _ I Toto/ Spaces Required = 63 spaces Prgoased Parking Spaces = 67 (fnc//2 hondl,,pped) I Lot 2 M M Wn9 h (Fa.eod 1 - 1 BZ'49"35' E , 1 // 8375 23�_ I _ H. d J LYbob 1 --- — W.ee /nwr a�wce�wbY OW EEA9—kg Aasocrotes. 1 1 , 7 dgirN ` tY /mea o-e /ran dtY of Savfh eurrvl9ron T Mms (in / r / ------------ Legend par-'d 20 pedes o _--- ------------ - Ovte revised De ptian Lriecked Date p Gamete monument hr/nd 1 -- -- -___________ --- Design LA✓ �'ifa A/irn ® C--te mmument to be set ` I or oiection aJ omer 1 A 1 C,,kawd Paiir i ____ li --- -_______-____-_----- 1 Property L-or RVbt of eby —A4 Erhtm9 ground cmtour ® seems monnw HA* t I a' 25• 50• 100' 15a' tag' 250' Bar Scale = 50' i 1 Lot 7 Summer ice Joint Venture — — — r �B a M. ' I1 / g'M=19529" CB R B / e out=J95. J5' t Extersan "•- wrw 9 R--2013 F, SMR IF2� _Swift Stroe PW sera wq M out=1965" -0 --- 8-M fi=19227' B•M ou1=192.T1' �e P _ __- _'�wr„b --___ �q G- i 1 l Appear. / hm of 1 R — 0 i eresfn9 Nono9e 1 i hv. out-195.57' bK MJ9{00' i / A�w CS a . LYBY N / Rim=TOJ.3' - ,//' wdwAd Mvdhr196Q7' 1 1 50'bufhr -/ �200 a✓h.aa{wv �i` . Awd 1 II � 111 I I \ � % 1Q13 wer/mB -- t % � ear Nww m,e wxr j • ; A*w. wavy Appror ocorton / i ifm_,D. CAM I We~ 1 , cp a '•� 1 Lot 2 � I N/E 1 Notes: Munson Earth Haying 1. TMs a nor o bom aay A x P WC y /Res mow, ow aa, o /Asa+ aeaabNmas Pw "by Che r'W. -M9 AswocMrwr 2. Aburf/sg Mgowrry /Asps a+r stun City a S-M b w #wtbn roe AkP, (M 1 ------------------------------ I— — - ---� N 8_375 23�— — — 288.03r I 1 1 1 1 Fa-�D9y � 1 11\ OefAwltftR! `\ Flrvrd 'B' \ \ \ t� \ \ 7-7 : 1 1 1 1 1 ` \ 1 I \ 50' AutAsv �\ , k I I ael,e%pmsnt, ea ROW 1 1 ,I _______ i S 845936w 9 — --��-1331.J1, eo x --__ ------------ cbnnectAri )a- - se ewoorrmo�t Proposed Bul h9 Office 7"500. sf fT=1070 :�rwo wawtr, sr1a. m9 ewe. I a .ate i I I \ I /\f I I I J -'-} FF 2070 - I 1 our - Trash wMowrc faits Sse oefay Ner Co r5 Rem 10225' m=J96.B5" rb maGR /nv J � 9 1 /nv. rzut=196.IS' � ! g I i i el F -10d 0" o s" I Raw. owaer r f \ \\ 1R , -:.195.65 I l RA,=199.0' Inv F r-J9395'. / b 2 1 tY1 'v -f � Mv.. t•194.J;B S z can M. -19520 JO' -- emu(-i95 1 1 -- 1 \ I r 50'setback I- 1 1 1 1 Mrooa�dTo H. & ✓ Dubois I ' �Psawa 2 ' 200' Z m9 But/e- 1 1 I I 01=6 N/ webard ��l%r-TORS •f f Mv. MIm�197Ja' MK t�197.40' u Potable Water Supply and Wastewater Design Flows: whste—ter Disposo/ and Oamestic Ubter Supply Design flows flows for Employees Type of employee Number Drivers 40 Of# e sW6,Uechaol s 10 rotol employees = 50 (af shifts) Rows f- employees = 50 amp. 1 15 CPD/emp - 750 CPD Total Design Row = 750 690 " 0.9 reduction for water saving future 67.15 CPO Plopct to be seal by Lot 3 f' Summer ice Joint Venture { Area=20.2 acres } f� fiend -I- O monmrsif RvnJ v �,a.r. mmumnr ro d wl • o.,twre� or,r rr,tAq pane msrar ® ENfN➢ww-mmM1de ;L b✓mt N 82 49 35" E, — — f042.51r AUG 12 2C 04 City of So Burlingto __ _ M1br mares oq/^ 40' 80' 1T0' 160, 200' Bar Scale 1" = 40, If I oo Lot 4 E Chose Properties - a Development, LID, Lot 7 Summer /ce Joint Venture _ - - ---� _ - - -- It PPC 1 -�_ \ a M. a,t 5, (+\ S 8439 36" K --f, t Extenshn New /Yee-st-dJ , Ren=201.5• \ -J. _-__B - v _ _ - 1331. 31 ' ex. e' PIC se �,�..►- __-T-- P zz GL fit\ _�__ _.------i'`' \ I z -- i - ••` as -\\ ---� � •-•••- \ '•\ ylll N _ -- � l - _ � -___a ._ \\\ \ \ \\\ LYGI9s /// MOt/Td J I APPro..- i oree ol�i /'/ j •\ 4 , 1 1 �.,,.` �� �� , \\\\ tea¢ \\ I •� t '\ _\�41 r�'�ad 2 , /� i \ 1-_`.\ ♦ \ i,l'1 i t lo Mewed A.hj.1sSC0' jif I Iln i h¢ mrL/9590' II ` _ '/ ! ' (11 l II / I I 11 •\ I J.`./ �� `� Mv. ! ,9a 4o �i I 3bi 1 200T weNwd \ /e / 111 ; I I ( 1 1 .III I 1 1� L111 PA�d i i i 1, i I Proposed Bui/ ng N Office P>� NVAC ed / 4�IIIj 7500 If 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 \\ .t "/ 1\ 201 / , mo R / , fill; \\Y,\ %Px5 \\\\ \\ 1 l `\ _I `�r'esn drNosure :$ 1 j ( Na. CB owr-19.40' % 100J rot/wC 111 L7 1 I �w is o.�\� `Ilia daMeona, ' N . ••,e >eer �' \ \\\ \ , \` : \� \ \ \ , , 's', � >� � 1411 I 1 ! (Ilney and rb�rw aut/W 1 .•\ , L\s` \ \ \ \ , 1 xi Nw CB 1 III 1I •� My r=>96.80`2 i \\�s� ,1 \I1 ,1 I I I Rh-20 23' O� I11111 O I � .... �.� � *� �� I I} 1 i i i I I i 'i M✓. r95as' � I n u� %/ `\ `\ �. •gi :;\. 11 1 I I 1 I 1 I ; 'A My our�,96.73'1 � 11111 I I •\ ' ••-.•_ `e \\\\_{ I,III I I F; � . I 111111 .I IIII 1 ' I w / 111111 w •\ N arNet \ \\ \\ 1 1 I I I I 1.2 sl2cru e z75 Lot 3 -W&9 `1.2 , My our_,9c 9' •'\ I \ I 1 I I i �' II IIII 1 /r tibv Y wdMd , N>w �•,d wend, ♦.\yr 1 i i I 1 I i i I lYl Summer Ice Joint Venture -31 I } Me wr ,9s,c i - rF ao70' , nu / Area=20.2 acres W C" IZI.i ;` \. i it I ] � 11 iiii so' butler � CO .25' I g f 1111 O i �.�• 1 1 1 I �� Mv.:r-f96.15 IIIII DJ 1 \ 1 � I Mv. avfvJ96.15'1 II11 " I I Rwosed 20' S I 1 1 I I I 1 �-- - - — - - __•'y , i � f; � I q x10G4 i __ _ _ _:. I g ! I liiii 1.4 9 RM 2025' 1 )liiii Rbn=/99.0, I 1 11111 iiiiii x20275 111�11 i � FI Iil�ll f III II II, I 2° "`1 ulln f 1 I 11 , I I I I I`1 I New R2 111111 / 1 1' jj� 11 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I {II 1 .vew d sxrvon im:20120�-195. I I I I 111 �ADSN p lilt' l ; Mv. r�lr9�lwd'8 sromi t nv -t 19J0• 5f iii l Lot 2 I I a 1111111a I,I,1-. >=ara3 n1�11 0 I F 11 (iifiii� ill III 2o,b a iiiiii Munson Earth I Notes /s nor o —wy u!11}i. ✓%ng I. mt> Y FIwaty P/w //'+�' anown ore flan o enuuae I I I 1 1 1 1 �_ MoI fill 7/eadvMatd Pak'by GYM Eng -, Assodore> 2 Abwmg Prww y /Me> we nan air ar Sawn BWM9ran r- mr , (M 1 1 I , 11111 1 I , I I 1 1 I_ _- - _ 1I j I 5N E - -•— .Wt.,f-). li'sa�--'r ;� I1� N 82493 \y\\\ ` /// 1 .1°k�/ f fill --1042.51 �02 -11 -- ---- 8375 -oren for II I ___3y-setback rao9e Ji I — _ N11F N 2�, — P wne•d �• H. ✓. Dubois ee .d PE a2 I zoo• z M9 errrnw 1 I 1 Legend J- mxa nr • s...x Nib Iam> ■ rd.,.re e,�,w,„e ro a w �ra,a ---- »ter RWe,- ® .e..-mmnw•a � H/Vmf mrm� 0' 20' 40' BD' lip* 200' Bar = 40' ��f1y C/l,o fS �Icd 1 Am wntur+ we, -cr vw1 p - . � Nkr Aw-atmAYra Cdel \ stw r2 SW °"/ft St/ seta v c ,aaa RkrraYMO"� D" Mr. J 192..T]" weer 9 P - 1 B•M. ou1=,92I1' '--_w_/ay a 0--- ®------------------ — -- 8 ®--®— — a/- _ I 1 orvfMq ba.,a9. .. ./ Qhls / ,• 1 M, � �,;, � y=--------, "'per \-- _� �,• III k�.i / '-`r-- - -- -------•'" .:- Ii Pond IIj i O 1 ( I�I� III11 \ IIIi11i /11�1 I IIII I 2011 \l t \ I 'J �\ •'� I 1 .1 I \�I�i I,III I 1 I 11 11 �i••'�`I W� \ t ' 1 1 1 b • 11 P> AYE 1 I F f % f7)A/ ®I I rTOI i 14 I _ ��' `, (t• 1 I III 1]���\�\`, it kill QItll 11 If 1 I R/ , "IIII' 111' 11 1 II l 'II'Il'/ Ilillil Lot 2 N/t MunlanEwYh MO"hy I I i, II nryay� i , 111,1111 IIII, 1, 1 1 ,111111j Iil,l 1, 1 Notp.. , 1 Ill 111 lr ll�l III I, ll W1 =- Proposed Buil n Office Pas 7, 500 s. Fi-207.0' r Lot 4 Ill went , I I 1 , I ��---�------N-�J 77 .5j 84159 36r Y @------ Sei Oetaea �! ` 'I c1 1 r 1 +21J1. 75 I 1 '.,FF ' X 207 1 I I 1 � 1 1 I 1 1 J I I I ' I � I}j ' I 1L 1 � 1 I J ,10275 r I , i 1 L a ! I 16 nJr Il,ll _ IIII fill n 1" �� II -y 11 11 �11 11 �111 IIII / Jill, III, 'IIII II I I11 11111' Illllj I111, IIII, 11111 °IIII, 11111 9111j O � I111 111111 1 I111, 'IIII, 1 IIII lun i 1 u't, I 1�, I In I I It dull / 1 IIII 1 Jill 'IIII I I111 duu Inn i 'IIII Illljr 111111 �111,1 111111 �nU I I11 I ,. Ab N rror o -- y r Hq-y 1Mq Nowr n! DYm oWar rrNINO II �1'$\•�\���iw.�i " 1 ' \ll . / ii �l ll 7MoabN rds Pak"bY CM E�rgirwiq Amvera[ -II 2 ADulthq P'9r~'rY /np ar M1arr CRy o/ So9M d iglm tar fkpwap b II -71 AI ] / I 1At _ 8325 23r E — N� _ 20 le nP H. & ✓. Dubois - _ - - 288-031 II I�E f OLf/rR� 010®®® CAM r I.060kaw'd �, 9'0 i> Landscap/ng Schedule Unit Esth-W �.¢i9telax vzoOLOW S~ C"t eats_ Ausfrioa Piro 8'-10' tor,/ 21 ®rr 1495 111.M5 Plw ry. Rid A/gw4 2-1/1" ro' 5 •Yrr OW 1x000 .It. P.&-. Alb 2-1/2" cal. 5 $450 $2250 r<1 I DarxpYer .-. .. !B" aPreod 6 • r' i100 1600 Jnibmy "Aomrocw' 2 9W- 25 0" IM 12000 •j Bbm Y tow 6 0- $90 I%0 Ile fw bar 1R �or 3' tow 19 • H $125 2375 1 (>~ Jpa��- 2-1/2" M. 4 •^ 1-W 11,200 f6Fkw-il9 11X r2v Lot 3 Summer Ice ✓oint Venture Area=20.2 acres Leaend al■. r ..blsd .ate ,r.,, u Via, N 82 49 35' E — jo42.51 0' 20' 40' BO' l20' 16" 200' BCr Scale - 40' Oafs reHaeJ Oesalalian c'ncvtea D°°19n 'AJ Landscape Plan Drawn fl1P Check" Corporate Headquarters Scale 1•- A Land Air Date "Y27, � Pro' t 03225 Swift Street Extension-HJnesbu19 Rd South 8-Mgt-, Vermont A/PEBS d L4i 'SING Consulting Engineers, Inc. _ _"�` /B'! Alain Stree4 Colchester, Vermont 05" " .D 1I I m I Lot 4 Properties ent, petL 1D. — — o dopm Lot 7 _ — ✓en tune _- 3 Ln I Summer /ce Joint _ — ---� _ R i W, "T.�.' , - _ : 84596 3�% — — -----'�=--�� — c. .svu ert Swig S'troat ExlBnsbn y 1331.31' ea'. B�PIC x.'a' A...' 4'_ � B• by h=I9135� _ OttB_ 192, ♦ - + T `-- Y .�•+��" .. iYPeA oa,s m e lriand f ift / 1 7�i-i 1�>''• s _ Ond w/u- are the A—inonce by the nor lightnq, m ------_-_ of \ h9 oaf r' y^ i q• •. +"' • provided - .' foot —Yes, os calculated by ' y• Y .-� ry - Lux/ on, V2J2, by Cooper Lighting. aim I { - -. Y tt Y ! L TYPE A wwMsld '^tom' ,r _ 1 rvupr os a r E Y q Contour Lem/s i pr osed Building T _ P ///umkace s a-ea>eo eJ.n,. �.•" 0.1 loot-eoadle - -- otrice oe' Z, 0.2 tool -condo y a• 7 TYPE 03 loot -condo wl w to fbot-_.VO 1` + .IO /bat-tnnale —.* J� y ' 5..0 foot-can0'e `, ',J.: t r 1 � ■ ■ 1. � h1>�.,. se. 4eravv r r r olee..eu. I �_-•>� Y ra f - t' i , - .. Lot J rhq owe t• ': Y Y _. Summer Ice "ht Ventura p e.narw - Area=20.2 acres r s (( IR I- Pale mounled 1a' - � i ' Lumbroireum Lo k r' Hammera-ea rftry rryt Wd e. _ _ - // � � � q .. + >' s • I. � Y s 5 noun!rrd h 2h' q \ s> 1 TIM ■..,`...YY� � -° .. w \ t Y 1 f pass /// eel/and � F)' 2aY.B' 3` � Base cave/ Ji Y - I I —III III_ a�mrna.wtocr tria., f- lbrnoorians. I rY I r r Typ/co/ Area L/yht Deto// I' H, rS IV82.4! 60/ selbdck N� N 23—E — -- N. a ,t Aubo/e I I � 1rl LUMRRN Kax.•rJs./., � e��....,. a.r tl r r Yww • eteb-r w!'e 4. i. e.rr ;... - 1nu Yw�1"a r.4 - o«,rY.w»e4.e. t reNa. w..a�a •....ry ■■MON7 nwe rv.,.. t wa TYPE B Lama k ANV orrpaaf Mtri Mount ro wrr, wero•-nm,�✓, rn acvwo /nw. R.xcrn w v ✓anree ,1 145 (a 115' where n —) w�...�: �--�;::w.• ..- a w'-•ar.. w"e.www � • ^ TYPE A Lamaf Harwne- Ana Ught J�5 worr, .vero•-ndraa n 15 q.roa vae u,..,nrea or ' tvm..v pnafFL'1 bn J O c� 0^ sew. o' 10' a' ,sa' ,so' scn' BOr .SCOle - 40' Date -...d be.nprtar I 0.« aore DeeNn f"J Ligh tin Plan Drawn FAW Checked Corporote Headquarters Scale l w - 40 Land Air Date • Y17,1 Pro t Oa 5 SWR Street Exfmsion-Hhesburg RD South Burilngton Vrmont AREBS & IWASWW Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164( Alain Stree4 Colchester, Vermont OSl�6 Lk/ro-AI D— Mon O 10 g Ooc*, Lo g Oackr Tso' - iel ii I I CONE I I OF• oo!Overhang .4J-R p F F comP I I I F E _ _ ADMINISTRATION — — W TRUCK TERMINAL I i i�'2i I I JA M. I FF -r RREAI(�.... OM 4' Roof ang — T R — — — � �� fiacoT-r Fii�siPFJ• r• - Py-o" Eh57- ELLVArION r-YS'-O" mac' ■■■N■■■■■■■IN, L—aw 0o LoaR'y ax*, I/SI !Mv Dff -h D— WEST FLtVADON r - Iv -a- 4' R f 0 -9 4' Roo! Ove -g ovx HVN daw, arer frvcF duds TF ,f fieen .sAdng. e 0' O" O,rk G oy w Bron f b/xk -' . ... F/,v. ].0,Nfwn aoB' Ia10' Oev TOJO :. ...... '.' �.. Ym Ogrr BO.O' NOPrtl EUVATION r -V-a" 50UTi1 EUVAI-ION r, -rsl-m RECEIVED AUG 12 2004 City Of SO. Burlington FOR PERMIT REVIEW Thrust Existing water main rrahnsleeve and KoNe by Clow, New water service —.-� ueeror approved equal. Wet tcp shall be instilled by persons approved by the City of South Burtington Dept. of Public Works and the Engineer. [Aical Tapping Sleeve and Valve Catch Basel Site Max FJ- D1ometsr J' da 12 4' ah 24' 3 dh 30 so oft JB Frame and grate, LeBwm LF248-2 w equal LeBaron LK120A r ogee /s greoter thin 5( bfgee r 6' T� ✓rite, b" rhg 4: W- - butyl rope. b Isyt " Cate •oho and trmp- q' switch. Kennedy Central Sprinkler 59GF w F-tM-o1h t snail be him than 1 out e/ -t- tt5d5 8 8• approved equal � 8' To domestic Bockflaw Prevention �Pp/y 2' U-*&Vbed mat-W (Watts Series 709 double check or 8 veal equal Bockfiow Prevmlion aPPra % City Entrance (Watts Senroe 709 dmble check - See mechanical drawings fordetois of Wpro-d equal) sp nkl- syslern, domestic wot- must be lso/oled from spnkl- system with Wotts Sines 709 double aheik or Wp--d equal Backflow Preventer Schematic K T.S Anchorage of Valms I3/16' aklYd 2 1121, J/2r- ~ rerw na. abW wkpd to 6mf ohs .6w oe char e. choir.✓ h ,stare _ 3/4' e-, loft 3' Area of eewh9 threaded wed mr/s rr1 r/gAfeme� •.• agokhlaf u+bseweed u,aarweed a-m Section Elevation Note A thrust dank Y1aN be iulohe d W warsmah ean:d oar, .o'.. emit. ,dies redraws me aw me raga N1th roncreM supp-t d mho ( buried gore woe Oeloa eeo I. umwrweee sW Yh l - me hw 1A o/ ppe 6' mho hro � l•kr9 ' .' (/W^cd% • �� male ,bad ark Efhcfiw b ✓o/ve/Dead End yore �o ). Reducer Und[sfuread for ,tole: Aoce J me. (mhhwmy pdyeMy,Wrs Yroef bittern d/ cmwere thrust Molt oral Ppa/ Arfhys to fxewnr erne cmoe're am not row ears ra. ! errhgs u etnvbae tar Tx 90',45,22 1/z' ar 11 1/4'Be7d Thrust Block Details N. Ts u............ .a,e -1 q inn Q-- of r ,rota Thniel m-* fin a feeti .Y 4• s' S. 12" sea —AAao a3 a1 a3 aJ Q3 IO a1 QJ 10 /J to as 20 25 l.J 1.0 4.0 SS 10 Is sere fwhi 14OW O 1.0 loll aJ 1101to as 10 l0SO Eq l.q 45 65 15 EO IQ 14017.5 40 " 1.0 to to aJ Eo as l3 40 13 10 rJ eo 3 5025111 6afi3 30 qn0 1. 1 3 73 o 1 13 tll/0 ). 2,000 10 J J to SO 70 AO 20 lQ ISo Bo l0 l6 I40 7.0 IS sort .ray I" ewr...�a�.e - gob tar ono catch bosh sire shag be /:erg- thin :,dr wed m the odoaent wart if the raoammended tact,» b- of pyres p—t-Mg bye catch bosh n eAca W S j Yryr ro � —Cost 41 place aanerete ,bar. Use close B concrete (.;600 psi) between cant ion bane and precast cone,,1. catch bosh voted bmwr by Cbnp• piawdd - equal - AS1M q- C478-88 - A000 PSr co-w. - Steel revibled to AS7f $vacs. - AASHrO H-20 wheel /pod Mbhrpraof aid with 11m-drkd grout. taw 124•-//////// / "-J/4" to 1 1/7- grhlenee irate rwica/ Catch Basin 1K T.S D+1" na`kro ra nerd, wofvq c anaa es pa,.e a riknriy >� �mrbhy rhb 09tA - NJ.9W ,.v.4vnma rook- cawr,e en� a-ren x a -ea ear m J' h ar'enerr, n m Ar�roa gay - / korneear w heawfea aw—ArrI/"b J/e' e r..nrx e..ck- noted, ova a 11^ /w J • gran sroen lbw nnar .YM aaw pa.en I 5EE 95l 90R q standard stmdord I prod- Proctor ma stir vac 1/I' ro J/i' ovahM erere Sw demo !w aY ppe era. ra,refew or ppe exw one caw cnairurn.e m.rrke Storm Trench Detail N T.S. ctrr7lw I r far saw m m Jr rr .. ware a�w Jr son - trW ; I 1,r Roe. threaded m AOM ends weh ours cox aid• luya f- Jo' � ivy a JB' ray . r I use 12" b 2(12 4'r only. jAs / 1 A Fla A/temots (bM/e�60na Rehf-gee edge . Xa1aw 1. Ton plot. ro De pinched to maw habk h Mkt Ap J/e' ga-,ree b-, to be Am~ "". or - plate is W + ia' far "' to JO' dknnerw ppe hdurr. and W + 22' few J6' to 4B' diamets ppe hc/u.lre. H 2. Skkt secrkn hoc 12" to 24' d/arafw ppe 7 halos"re (p fie move m me piece 1 • B" J SAxf archon b Ja" b 4e' diwners ppe /Mae 11 ce mac epoch hd-iw may be move tram fro shxfs tamed by riwfmw brrhg m cents /hs tied E%eN7t%M J/B' 9d irad drofs w bdrx 4. C.mecr- se 1- s pro,. and far Mafe tK ro bk- OerrenskxY pp ever abnela /Y Yet. IY I I n w p/.N 24' aw4 9 IJ B 4/ 48 2-� 1 Qyw SWt1W End Section Detail nts E Construction Notes 1. the Cmtroctar w111 be responsible fa al/ cgnstnrctim of water man, stern and sanitary sewer systems as shown on the dims He orb"/ be revan.b/e for o// necessary adopter; Nth98, eta to make cannectims to the exlstmg and prgoosed uthihes. The Cmbacte, shd/ be responsible far d/ work shown or anp/ied on the plans md/w ref -mood h the spec 6catims and permits The Cmtroctor shot/ submit far approve/ by the Engine- all types of mafer/o/s and products used Water Main 1. the poe f wore, man shol/ be ducti iron class 51 manuloctured h accordance with AWWA C751-76, ar PW pressure ppe DR 18 (Schedule 80) AWWA C900, as noted on the drowhgs A// ppe shall ham push an type Joints Al/ fittk,^ valves, etc. shd/ have mechenco/ lbhts. Poe rtfngs shall be manufvchrred by Clow, US Pipe, ,lohns-Umn7le, or approved equal. 2. A// poe shall be into/led h occcrdmce /AWWA C-600 Ore ppe shall be kept free of ! 0, matt- and &an's during krstd/otim. When the process of poe /ayh9 has stopped my open ends of ppe shall be plugged More shall be a -Nmum of 6 -0" cover over al/ ppe and service lines Any ppe de8actron shd/ not exceed fifty (50) p-cent of reccmmmded manu7 fur-'s maximum deA tim. 8-*17/ mot-los and procedures shall be as detaded on the drawings The Cmt tar shall be responsrble tar my and a// sheelhg and/ ~k'g noes y to comply wA05HA - WSHA reguletlIns. J. the testing 0! the water mam shall consist If the testing of all i std/ed ppe, service; hydrants, etc. fie testhg shot/ consist of a pressure test followed by o leakage test. A// testhg shall be done with potable water and h the presence of the Engineer The pressure lest canssRs of montaining a mhh7um Alt of ppppe re of two hunted (200) pounds per square caw w two (2) how s Fodure to hold the presswe (+/- 5 psi) /w the specified tine crostitules loDure of the feet lw the pwticu/w section o/ ppe. The leakage test shall be conducted for me (1 hour. The lkne for the leakage test may be !nc/uded with the tine of the pressure test. During the leakage test the quantity of water necessary to mahtah the testhg pressure o/ the silent shall be measured The leakage sha// not exceed the oeowaible vYues as shown in table 6 AWWA C- 600. Failure of my test section will necessitate repair and/w rep/ cat of the faded cation. Workh7g pressure and test pressure shall be del -mined pkrf/y by Eng*,— and loco/ go—W agency 4. Ch/winotim of the item shall be accomplished after the water main has been successfully pressure tested and thoroughly flushed Dishhrtim shall be h accordance ww/AWWA C-601. the method of dis,0&ct/m shall be approved by the Engineer and only after romp/es of water from the flushed disk7fected main shows no evidence of bocte � gica canl-nhotion. Use 50 m9/1 hr 24 hours. The concentration must remain :Yore 25 mg/1 Tablet dshfection is not acceptable Sanitary & Storm Mains 1. One pipe far sanitary sew- and storm rho// be PW gravity sew- poe SDR 35 (ASWO MJ4) with robber -ahg rings. Al/ ppe shall be laid to the /he and grade shown on the plans 2. The hstd/ed sanit y sewer ppe shd/ be low pressure own tested h the presence of the Engine -.After ppe Neanrng, the pipe sechan (manhole to manhole) shd/ be tested according to the f:6owhg procedures An Memo/ ppe pressure of 4 pounds per square inch greater than any bock pressure due to a wafer table shall be created A minimum o/ two (2) mhutes shall be allowed for temperature stabwiatim. fie poe sectim shall be considered acceptable when, tested of o pressure of J pounds per square inch great- than any back pressure, the section does at lose air of o rate greoler thm DOOM cfm/sf. of Mend pipe area. Seporotion of Water and /or Sanitary & Storm Mains 1. No water main shad be Nos- than ten (10) feet to any emit y sew-, stom, se or sanit y manhole, and five (5) feet to anycatch basin. Provide minimum of 18• vetoed sepw0thn between wat- main and sfmn/smilary sew-. Ja and Notes In addYion to the above requirements, all water lines and sewer lines and mmholes shah/ be thoroughl y tested by the Cent tar in accordance with the E-knomantal protection Rules 9110182, Appendix A, S bon A-02(Ja&K) and A-04(CdH). Note: Al/ constme6a7 shall be accp/ished in accordmce with the sfmdards act forth it the latest edition of the public works yWecirrcoboh of the aty of South Bud07gton and ret enced specillcot/ant in the core of conflict, the mare sfh'gent spec/fi-l'an shall godly Contractor shd/ keep a log book of at least three swklq ties to since local— and any polls of defiection ar wafer man fitfhgs Books sho/ be turned ow- to the Owner upon accept— of work Bewtkns to the tap of s-vices shall also be recorded O+2' pithy ro meted Wawp IM Cme.cb �d M pa Me Waved rswmedb her <eraflh9 eifh a.W - r057/A .wwrkns femme. by Me fnaner- ea.r- mafeM ,bar fah far Aew yrwrr r m a .r« n. 95! 90.T Acre. karoz day w $RA- rd sfmZ'I ,.yank marro. fvaa, m Iz' ima can . ,err a, mekeree proof- prxfar arm. w br - Frfw yhw ono,. as a�rrrhe �e r,rme o char, ra a - :7: m a�wd eenoye elm « per vote - w boo. a+,ra a ."i dye , 6 See ptmt M d ppe W me ores (kres[whM.r4/wM� Water Trench Detail N T.S N07E• Top may be made directly to ductile iron ppe. WWI other pees use either a coupling contohing o factory -topped brass bushing w use o double strga s-ace clamp. Al/ tops larger than 1" require the use of bronze saddles. All brass unions and adopt-s she// be Mueller Access cap d poved cross —try-O Te/escgoic curb box, -buffelo (n typo p Mueller H-10JJ4 or oppro-d equal New corpoeatim stop Mueller H-15008 or approved equal - Curb stop Mueller Frost H-15200 - equal �8 x16"x4- solid concrete block a 4 Water Service Detail a k N. T. S. ee Topping saddle .�1 Clow F-1280 (fore:) F-6350 (for Pvcr �� Wotei moi H+� FOR PERMIT REVIEW C Date 0 4" Road Construction Notes (A..ewae,n oadehawazy Paugawo<a,.e,, 1. New rood shall be constructed to the life and geode shown m the d owMgs The rood and utility locations she// be 1�pico/ly detaBed unless otherwise shown. 2 Methods / construction of sub -base shall cent to Vt. Highway Specs. (1990), 20311 "wbgrade" in a// respects ar as determined by the Engineer. 3 Gard sub -base /or parwnent shall con! to Vt. Highway Specs (1990), 704.05 table 704.05A coarse. 4 Leveling course shall conform to Vt. Highway Specs (1990), 704.05 table 704.05A, fine . Shoulders shot/ coal to section 704.12,, Aggregate for Shoulders. 5. Bituminous concrete per ent shall conform to Vt. Highway Specs. (1990) Sectim 406. BNfder coarse shall be t)pe n and ill wearing coarse shell be tppe17. 6. Any sub base or subgrode disturbed by Contractor, or rendered unsuitable by construction machinery shall be removed and replaced with appmred granular backfill Sub base shall have 95X of maximum compectlan density before road construction. 7 The Contractor shall be responsible for all cmnpmtim tests far the rood foundations and utility trenches. B. FYI material far road embankment shall be approved by the Engk a EA/ shall be placed n 6" Efts and wetted and compacted with satisfactory compoctim equpment. The Contractor shall per/ 2 campocbon tests every 100" at the limits of the filing operation and shall recanpoct areas with less than 95X of maximum density, (Standard Proctor). 9. Oh- pph'cab/e, the Contractor shall fellow Vt Highway Specs. (1990) Section 2031/ for placing and spreading embankments 10. Road in M/ sections shall be placed and compacted a mnemum of J feet above top of my utility to be Installed; before trench is excovoted t pipe placement /n trenches, and cut secfims the C tractor shall provide all necessary sheeting, shorng and bracing to maintain compliance with all OSHA/VOSHA regulations. 11. Sand All shall con/ to Vermont Highway -S-i6catims (1990) 7030J table 70303A. Abhl LYher je are no1 downed but are sops -deviled as .shown h the deter. below W- -wed flan Swift Street IW-skn, facing south, eogl dn' y dope` Iowawa 0 the proposed bt Adhg a1 1/4"per I t. � driveway 4. avaha- 1 1 1/2' top tjpw N eAfwnk+nlr fvw. Pow, wvfq awfbcv AOr pc MSQT 6' said AOT Spec lasw 09 & r Iksd _Proposed Drive Detail N.TS Fret» d' pas- N off Fnnh grade LebiC 266, anon CC 266 stelae to twah a equal Gaut flmre to brk v Briar lewlhq course Prweogk brxks be&— (5) cwPese max ortarhg (2) caweee rah. Og —1 mortar helve face of brink. _ BWtIN r116 w.ahed gravel n 6" lilts U red htWrred sewn lido/ achy ��(7U405) Canpoct to 95X of orbnum =11ty (Sta d&d Proc1ar) Pra"bw pet h place WWI when dpM 4, -'-O' Rhg gcowl or Mosik .steeds 6• flam tin to ilwf. AStkf C476 P—t rehfaroed Use po)vrWj&M concrete —Mae and cover NM by Co•1M PI—C Gf+ward - eWd V2Mtge J/1' gvrode 60 ales' reh/-crnenf n eWd Do not --tar hide 1 mj h. of manna.. Asphalt roofed �2- Mmhd. show be varuum rested whd hest phl /t atN "posed Mastk Rwrrorw hp as nN.drd AW 6• P'C Coe n p/ — perused goskel far W pipe penetrations. C—A, 610f. 40100 psi' aanaaete f/nokrhx6M fnohrio' 3/." to 1 1/7" arra'rM atone e tail New Sanitary Manhole (Dog House StWe) N. T.S 4" bit. cone. 1-112" rilps 2 1/1" To, i! see site p/d, f cross slope (— /,; bitumnous conorete poromenl 6" crtrshed 9-,W, s / vsdng course '0d felft •sr 71405A me 704.05A .meafh9 hawfs g .Coarse -. 12" grate(. boss (m.. a posh 2' O.D.1 ill AL b,twdM blear shy awned PNe o�d� N - se�vhcs t;niw, .ill cwtwi rail 2" O.O. Pba— J2" sand v (7o30.7), as ordered byengneer Afkari 50OX and or underamin ors ordered by engneer &2ical Pavement Cross Section Al T.S NONE 1. Sews- nw None to wte mohs shag be h oeeaeknee with Me 5ecannwnded etalwm /a eewagw wales' m-ad/ed M ante sf 2. oe Sewers ,.fib at kin of /sod to /oar hat fawy hen any erialhg a MNae/d 0. eb.. Me dblanro a , b rnMVed edge fa eajlre. it // Mia d'afarce cannott ee a Mon Me Ayes shd A. iufdhd aocvdhg for these top.o, set detobs wale Sal f boaknw nvnpoc'led - 6' ducN's bon wore e" fopns,,' atafdad f6" min. (d s SZ) srnce Pr«ra washy ��� 0e Sew 5Ywws oorshg watw mobs Meg b fad to provide a mhimum wtkai dbtanro of 16' bfwerr pane. Srww p h, we b puhbfanf one ors hw as pwsdn ham Ms wat—ah r0hts ellwr n b hposaen ro a,tah pn,o epaotiay Me sewn ~ be dig,, and cansbucW equal to wutw pbe and .show be prvwxe letwl to aysm—twfighbwu prier fa "', Sewer / Water Seporation Detail N. T. S. D41' perho ro vies- waw/hv IM Cefbwrfa ale! ale .M�i ov�i.� �vov�il � r.w,kf6nw.- pared aNar.d area say. r spent awrw:r afar Mon 3' h dbnetw, Iw tom kxwa daY a h IY sun ere — sore .t a 1/ ' !o J/ apjw( atawh mywv �; aaos amhe mptwte• deweva pp/ l' Riyd 51,v haAftier 1 �� and welw `ahoy popes u f/f' for J/I' auMed afaw bs'ow mfMhe d pits _ J\ Sanitary Trench Detail N T.S Construction Notes 10 R. !,Yee» trill 6 rhf// roofed roared ,.tee/ top ro; 1' no. /p I— Pope fs bekw I Yon— Mro 2- oN .. grand lire/ (tRa) xblh9 91aelnd Ft t oB concrete p- wanwre (ryp.) Live posh m1 [o a dpM of 2'-10" h a 10' dY—hw 'K dVi`s' a 4haft 3=6' A/s0 with cmnete. con v w .New b Y" m P4+e osrnbbd by s nit,, dwthya a bdtb and shall to fi nb sd win, d/ the nw:veay erthge Panels ehd/ he squiped with o Nwce rod and truss rod to xppat Me /ranee J' dbrrfefw- gate poets sha, b uesd fir gone /arprr tbal 4 mat. Trash Enclosure Detail n.t.,.. R•-B' 1. the Contractor will be responsible far o/ canstructian of water man, storm and sanitary sewer Systems as shown an the plans. He will be responsible l d/ neces y odple,, Nfthgs etcto mare connections to the existing and proposed utilities the Cmfracto- shot) be responsible f o/ work shown ar implied on the p/ s and/or referenced in the spec/rfcotims and perm;!,. the Cmlrmfar shalt submit 1 approval by the Engheer olt tees of materials and prrou cts used. Sanitary & Storm Mains 1. The pipe for sanitary sewer and storm shay/ be PVC gravity sewer pope 5DR 35 (ASTMD J034) with rubber senhbg rings. All pipe shill be laid to the Zile and grade shown on the plans 2 The instated smito y sewer ppe shot be low pressure oir tested n the presence of the Engweew. After ppe clearing, the ppe section ( anhote to manhole) shall be tested occardhg to the folawnq prose curer. An internal ppe pressure of 4 pounds per square inch greater than my back pressure due to a water table shill be rented A minimum of two (2) minutes shalt be allowed for t peroture stobili ohbn the pipe section shall be considered acceptable when, tested o1 o pressure of J pounds per square inch greater than any bock pressure, the section does not lose aw of a rote greater than 0.00JO ofm/s. f. of internal ppe orso. Separation of Water and /or Sanitary & Storm Mains 1. No rote man shd/ be closer than ten (10) feel to any smif y sewer storm sewer or sand/ y manho✓e, and Ere (5) het to my catch bosin. Provide mh7rnum of Ill" vertical sponation between rote most and storm/ der, sewn. esth7 and Notes - In addition to the above rsquirementsr all water lines and sewer hives and manholes shall be thormgh/y tested by the Contractor n accordance with the Envimmentol Protection Rules 91101",, Appandix A, Section A-02(jW) and A-04(G&Hl Note: A// construction she/ be occ phshed in accordance with the stondmds set forth in the latest adi!kn of the public woks spec!! flan of the City of South BuHfirgtan and referenced speorwoM-o h the rose of cm6kt, the more st'gent speciffoat/j, shall oo/y Contract- sho// kep a /erg book of of least three swing ties to servilocations and my pants of de9sctian or wotn main fittings Books she/ be fumed over to the Owner upon acceptance of work. E/ewtims to the top of s Wcss shall also be ceded RECEIVED AUG 12 City of S). Burlington FOR PERMIT REVIEW O O O O O Erosion Control and Construction Seouence Starr state dn'win an downst,— side of fence 7 Mi'pb En.s-ola�a a vawawkahc—fae 1. fie purposes of erosion cant-/ shelf be discussed with and p p approw�d by the Engineer and the Town of IYdh'ston prior to any Mko1/ l0a, kilter /obrk stgo/e orce hors to f Fite' &a6-k m woetreom Sb' e cl—q,, grubbing, strippmg or construction of any kind Stoke Form 12- deers t mM A 2. Al/ erosion control shall be placed as shown on the drawings or as "dered by the Engineer. All erosion control measures sha// be, at /py fobrk In bottom a minimum, inspected weekly and maintained to futrr// the intent discussed ob— The Cant—ctor shall maintain the erosion control corer with q- V � ro measures until the Engineer is satisfied that permanent ground corer has been established and that further measures ae not required Bdl<se flow E 3. Men erosion control measures ore deemed no longer necessary, al/ materials detained including silts and const-ction debris rho// be , II FOR PERMIT REVIEW collected and disposed of in a monna acceptable to the Engineer and the Town of Wdh'ston. 4. if highly erodible soils ore encountered the Contractor may be required to prowde pte mott/ng, gobron or rivet mattresses rip rap - oil,- measures as necessary to p—t erosion. Die Contractor shall stockpile hay bales to protect, at a in —um, al/ work in pogress All exposed embankments shall be topsoded, seeded and mulched os soon as possible after const—ctian. iJ Section A —A II VI I 1t I I vl II II � j � To be A -Wed at 50' to 75' I� ertwwldep-diM- pitch, acre reNved aesmprxn a J A a � on s S. The Can she// use woke- and/a talcum chloride i r list control. fie Contractor shall also sweep Leroy Road as required to Design lAd Details maintain dust control Drawn f.MP il-b Temporary Si/t Fence Checked Corporate Headquo Erosion Control Barrier Score vrs Land Air N.T.S Data ",A STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURUNGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119 PATTI R. PAGE` WRITER'S E-MAIL(ALAFFERTY@FIRMSPF.COM) ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-2552 JOSEPH S. McLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE AMANDA S. E. LAFFERTY (-ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y) March 10, 2005 Jackie Stevens, Clerk Environmental Court 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1 Barre, VT 05641-8701 Re: Appeal of Greco Docket No. 12-1-05 Vtec Dear Jackie: JILL E. SPINELLI WILL S. BAKER Pursuant to your request, I am writing in connection with the above -referenced matter to inform the Court of the status of this matter before the City of South Burlington Development Review Board. The Board's reopened hearing on the application that is the subject of this appeal has been continued until April 5, 2005. I will inform the Court, in writing, of the status of this matter as soon as possible after April 5, 2005. Please call with questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Amanda S. E. ASEL/br CC: Raymond Belair ✓ Joseph and Mary Greco David and Heather Main Kenneth W. and Joanne Perkins Peter E. and Leslie Black Plumeau Paul and Cheryl Houchens Donna Lee Diane Naomi Roen son5632.cor Lafferty, VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT South Burlington, City of 575 Dorset Street South Burlington VT 05403 ---------------------------------------- Appeal of Greco, et al (802)479-4486 255 North Main Street, Suite 2 Barre, Vermont 05641 February 8, 2005 Docket No. 12-1-05 Vtec The above -referenced appeal from a municipal panel was received at the Environmental Court on 01/21/2005. Environmental Court docket number 12-1-05 Vtec has been assigned to this appeal. Please use the Environmental Court docket number and the above case name when filing any documents or asking any questions concerning this case. All documents should be filed with the Environmental Court at the address below the Clerk's name at the foot of this letter. Also, if you have not provided the Court with a telephone number where you can be reached during working hours for the purpose of telephone conferences, please do so as soon as possible. The Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings (V.R.E.C.P.) set out the procedures to follow for this appeal. Enclosed is a copy of those Rules minus Rules 3 & 4 which are not applicable in this type of action. I have also not included some of the Reporter's Notes. You may obtain a full copy of the Rules and Reporter's Notes at www.vermontjudiciary.org. 1. The person filing the appeal is called "the appellant". The appellant must take certain actions in order to assure that this appeal is not dismissed. Consult the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings to see what those actions are. 2. This case will be ready for hearing or other appropriate disposition when the time for filing the appellant's statement of questions has expired, or 20 days after the notice to interested parties has been sent, whichever occurs later. The Court may extend that time if a request is made by written motion filed with the Court before the deadline has expired. If this case is set for a hearing on the merits, the hearing will take place in or near the county in which the case originated. Please note that pursuant to V.R.E.C.P. 5 (b)(4) (g), these appeals are de novo, unless the municipality has adopted procedures to make certain appeals on the record. February 8, 2005 - Page 2 - 12-1-05 Vtec 3. Faxing a copy of a document is not sufficient to meet deadlines for filing documents with the Court. Faxed copies may be authorized by the Court in certain circumstances, but the Court will not accept Faxed documents unless the sender has first telephoned the Court and obtained permission to do so or and unless the judge has authorized it in a scheduling order. 4. The person filing any document (including letters) with the Court must also send a copy of that document to each of the other parties. The Clerk of the Environmental Court will contact the parties to arrange for a pre -hearing conference in person or by telephone with a judge or with a case manager. The Environmental Court will be moving on Friday, February 11, 2005. If any documents are mailed to the Environmental Court after Friday, February 11, 2005 they should be mailed to the new address: 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641-8701 the court's new telephone number will be 828-1660. Sincerely, Ja yn M. Stevens, Court Manager Vermont Environmental Court 255 N. Main Street, Suite 2 Barre, VT 05641 (802) 479-4486 Encl Pro Se Form to all appellants & Notice to Interested Parties to Mr Plumeau CC: Appellant, Mary Greco Appellant, Cheryl Houchens Appellant, Joseph Greco Appellant, Heather Main Appellant, Donna Lee Appellant, Kenneth W. Perkins Appellant, Paul Houchens Appellant, David Main Appellant, Joanne Perkins Appellant, Peter E. Plumeau Appellant, Diane Naomi Roen Appellant, Leslie Black Plumeau Open Case, South Burlington, City of MEDIATION: Help in Resolving Your Environmental Court Case 1. What is Mediation? In mediation, parties meet and make their own decision about how to resolve a dispute. Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution, sometimes called "ADR". It is an alternative to court (where the judge makes the decision). Courts around the country recommend mediation. Trying mediation does not affect your rights when and if the case does go to court. A mediator is a person chosen by the parties. The mediator was not involved in the dispute before. The mediator does not make a decision in the dispute. The mediator helps the parties sort through the issues in the dispute. The mediator also helps the parties discuss possible settlements of the dispute. If the parties agree on a settlement, it is written down in simple terms and is submitted to the court for approval, which then closes out the court case. What are the benefits of mediation? What can you expect at your mediation session? How does it work? Who attends? What do you do? This handout answers those questions. 2. The Benefits - Why Go to Mediation? Mediation is usually fasterthan court. The parties and the mediator can schedule a mediation session as soon as possible. In court, parties can wait months for a trial and a decision. Mediation is more convenient. A mediation session is scheduled for a day and time that's convenient for the parties. Mediation can happen on evenings or weekends, not just during the week. The court must schedule trials during the workday. Mediation is usually cheaperthan going to trial, especially if lawyers or expert witnesses are involved in a case or if there are many court documents that have to be filed or reviewed. In mediation, you can tell your side of the story — in your own words. In a mediation, all the parties tell their side of the story, speak less formally than in court, and express their feelings. But the mediator keeps things under control. The mediator focuses on settling the dispute. A mediation is confidential. In court, documents and hearings are open to the public. N:lediation can help a project applicant, neighbors, and the town resolve other issues related to the dispute and agree on ways to handle any future problems related to the project. The courtcan only decide the particular application or case in front of it. 3. The Process - How Does Mediation Work? Mediation is less formal than a court proceeding. Mediation gives parties a lot of choice. The parties choose the mediator. They choose a meeting place, such as a conference room in a convenient location. They choose a mediation date and time that's convenient for all the parties. The project applicant, the neighbors, the opponents, and a representative of the town can attend a mediation. If these parties have attorneys, the attorneys would probably also attend the mediation. In a typical mediation, the parties first meet all together with the mediator. Each side makes an opening statement with no interruptions. The parties (not just their lawyers) say what they feel about the issues and how they want to resolve the case. Usually (but not always), the parties then discuss the issues together. At some point, they may split up and go to different rooms and the mediator would go back and forth between rooms to talk to different parties (like "shuttle diplomacy"). When a mediator meets alone with just one party without the other parties, this is called a "caucus." In a caucus, a party and the mediator talk confidentially. They discuss a party's interests and concerns. The mediator and a party will talk about whether or not what they say in a caucus is told to other parties. The mediator uses the caucus sessions to help the parties come up with settlement ideas and respond to -settlements proposed by another party. If the parties agree on how to settle the dispute, the mediator helps the parties write a simple settlement agreement. The parties may sign it right there. If the mediation doesn't settle the case, the Environmental Court will proceed with the case, hold the trial, and issue a decision. 4. The Mediator - How Do I Find and Choose a Mediator for My Case? The Environmental Court has a list of mediators who have signed up to mediate cases in each county. The list for your county is attached. People on this list are professionally trained to be mediators and also have taken some special Environmental Court training. You and the other parties can choose any person on this list to be your mediator. You and the other parties can also choose any other qualified mediator, if that person is acceptable to all the. parties in your dispute. If you're not sure about using mediation in your case or if you have questions, you can call a person on the attached list just to get more information about mediation. You can talk to that person over the phone-, the phone call is free (other than the cost to use the phone for the call). If you like the person you call and the other parties agree, that person can be your mediator. The cost of paying the mediator is often split equally among all the parties in a mediation. But which party pays what percentage of the mediator's fee (or if one party will pay all the cost) can be discussed and negotiated, when the parties agree to mediation or in the mediation itself. Different mediators charge different rates. You may call more than one mediator before deciding which one to choose. 5. My Role - How Do I Get Ready for Mediation? • Get all the documents or drawings you think are important to explain your side of the case. The mediator may ask you for copies of these and may ask you to send them to other parties. • Have someone at the mediation who can make a final decision for your side. • Think about what points you want the mediator and the other side to understand. • Think about weak points in your case. Think about the strong points of the other side. - • -1 Think about reasonable ways to resolve the dispute that would satisfy you. Realize there may be ways to resolve the dispute you haven't thought of. Be flexible. Many Environmental Court cases involve neighbors. If your case involves your neighbors, think about what you'd like your relationship with these neighbors to be like in the future. MEDIATION CAN HELP YOU AND OTHERS TO RESOLVE THE DISPUTE. YOU HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE BY TRYING MEDIATION. Chittenden County List of Qualified Mediators Who Have Met Experience and Training Requirements for the Environmental Court Mediation Program January 1, 2002 Last Name First Name Address Phone Fax E-mail Barra David P.O. Box 123. Essex Junction, VT 05453-0123 879-7133 879-0408 dbarra@up-law.com Barone Robin P.O. Box 9, Newbury, VT 05051 866-5458 leabaron@aol.com Bissonnette Ellen 77 Harlow Drive, Bristol, VT 05443 453-4254 453-4254 bisson@accessvt.com Blackwood Eileen P.O. Box 875, 90 Main Street, Burlington, VT 05402-0875 863-2517 863-0262 blackwood.law@verizon.com Bryan Lee 475 Tansy Hill, Stowe, VT 05672 223-2926 229-2141 Iwbryan@sover.net Byrd Yvonne P O. Box 1084, Montpelier, VT 05601 223-4784 yvonneb@promediator.com Cadow Lisa Viewpoint Resolutions, 45 Lyme Road, Suite 206, Hanover, NH 03755 603-643-5444 603-643-4994 Icadow@viewpointresolutions.com Cassels -Brown Peter 667 Conway Road, Starksboro, VT 05487 453-2350 453-2350 pacbvt@together.net Cassidy Richard Hoff, Curtis, Pacht, Cassidy & Frame,100 Main St, Burlington,VT 05601 864-6400 860-1565 rcassidy@hoffcurtis.com Cook Cynthia Adamant Accord, P.O. Box 2, Adamant, VT 05640 223-1330 229-6386 ccook@adamantaccord.com Curley Wayne Woodbury Dispute Resolution Center, 660 Elm St , Montpelier, VT 05602 800-820-0442 229-2141 waynec@woodbury-college.edu Fead William ("Sandy") Paul Frank & Collins, P.O. Box 1307, Burlington, VT 05402-1307 658-2311 658-0042 wfead@pfclaw. corn Gardner David 405 Culver Hill, Middlesex, VT 05602 223-6778 dgardner@pshift.com Gartner Sandra 1 Piedmont Drive, Rutland, VT 05701 775-4954 775-0174 FlukesKid@aol.com Gerety Robert P O. Box 709. White River Junction, VT 05001 649-1910 649-1957 robert.gerely@geretylawoffice.com Godfrey Holly 73 Hill Side Terrace, Shelburne, VT 05482 985-5022 holgodfrey@juno.com Hadwen Brooke 457 North Street, Burlington, VT 05401-1620 658-6630 bhadwen@msn.com Halpert Rob Zalinger Cameron & Lambeck, 140 Main St , Montpelier, VT 05601 223-1000 223-5271 rhalpert@zclpc.com Hegeman Mary Ann 33 Kirby Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 652-1002 652-1002 zema52@aol com Kitchel Katie Viewpoint Resolutions, 45 Lyme Road, Suite 206, Hanover, NH 03755 603-643-5444 603-643-4994 kkitchel@viewpointresolutions.com Lamb Anthony 305 St. Paul Street, Burlington, VT 05401 865-6065 865-6066 alamb@alamblaw.com Lawson Barry Barry Lawson Associates, P.O. Box 26, Peacham, VT 05862-0026 592-3949 592-3950 lawson@helicon. net O'Donnell Bob WIN, Pomfret Stage Rd , Drawer 29, Woodstock, VT 05901 457-3211 457-1501 BobODonnell@woodstockinstitute.com Palmer Mike P.O. Box 528, Middlebury, VT 05753 388-4073 388-3945 bridges@together.net Powers Donald (Tad) Donald R. Powers P.C., 48 Court Street, Middlebury, VT 05753 388-2211 388-1113 drpowers@adelphia.net Ripley Barbara Wilson & Wilson, P.O. Box 159, Montpelier, VT 05601-0159 229-1900 229-9839 ripley@wilsonwhite.com Rodar Neal 3130 Mt. Philo Road, Charlotte, VT 05445 425-3083 425-3017 nealr@woodbury-college.edu Rome Alan 159 State Street, Montpelier, VT 05602 229-5060 229-6213 quest@together.net Rounds Thomas P.O. Box 33, 82 Main Street, Windsor, VT 05089 674-5373 674-5375 tmr@connriver.net Ruth Tina 397 Elm Street, Montpelier, VT 05602 229-1041 truthl@together.net Scarborough Kirby 1465 Center Road, Montpelier, VT 05602 229-5006 229-6850 kscarboro@adelphia.net Simon Brice Webber, Reis, Holler & Urso, 60 N.Main St, Rutland, VT 05702 775-2361 775-0739 briceemail@aol.com Suskin James 52 State Street, Montpelier, VT 05602 223-7427 223-2575 jsuskin@suskin.com Sussman Susan P.O. Box 908, Montpelier, VT 05601-0908 229-2310 224-9187 ssussman@together.net Terry Susanne 2847 Tampico Road, Danville, VT 05828 748-3512 748-5877 sterry@sover.net Wilkes ILorrie LawOffice of Kevin Griffin,PO Box 799, White River Jct,VT 05001-0799 296-6200 296-6202 twilkes@griffinlawoffice.com APPENDIX Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings .1. Scope of Rules 2. General Provisions 3. Civil Actions NOT INCLUDED IN THIS PACKET 4. Review of Environmental Enforcement Orders NOT INCLUDED IN THIS PACKET •5. Appeals .6. Definitions •7. Title '8. Effective Date Page 5 Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings RULE 1. SCOPE OF RULES These rules govern the procedure in the Environmental Court created by 4 V.S.A., Chapter 27, in all matters within the original or appellate jurisdiction of the court and the procedure in appeals from the Environmental Court to the Supreme Court. The rules shall be construed and administered to ensure summary and expedited proceedings consistent with a full and fair determination in every matter coming before the court. Reporter's Notes The Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings are adopted pursuant to 4 V.S.A. §§ 1001(g), 1002, and 12 V.S.A. § 1 to implement provisions of Act 115 of 2003 (Adj. Sess.) that expanded the jurisdiction of the Environmental Court and sought to simplify and consolidate the procedure for appeals and other actions before that court involving environmental and land use issues. See 10 V.S.A. § 8501. The rules consolidate all rules provisions applicable to the Environmental Court and replace and expand the provisions of former V.R.C.P. 76. Enforcement actions under 10 V.S.A., ch. 201, formerly covered by V.R.C.P. 76(b)-(d), are governed by Rule 4. Appeals from municipal land use decisions, formerly covered by V.R.C.P. 76(e), are governed by Rule 5, which also applies to the court's new jurisdiction over appeals from the Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources and from district environmental commissions and district coordinators conferred by 10 V.S.A. § 8503(a)-(c) as well as to appeals from the Secretary of Agriculture, Food and Markets under 6 V.S.A §§ 4855, 4861. Civil actions within the Environmental Court's original jurisdiction are governed by Rule 3. Enforcement actions under 10 V.S.A., ch. 211, continue to be Superior Court civil actions. Administrative rule -making continues to be governed by 3 V.S.A., ch. 25. See 10 V.S.A. §§ 8501(1), 8503(e). Rule 1, like V.R.C.P. 1 and consistent with 4 V.S.A. §§ 1001(g), 1002, sets forth the underlying purpose of the rules, "to ensure summary and expedited proceedings consistent with a full and fair determination in every matter coming before the court." In particular, as directed in 4 V.S.A. § 1001(g), added by Act 115, § 9, the rule is intended to be consistent with existing procedural provisions of 4 V. S.A. §§ 1001-1004 and to provide for "(1) expeditious proceedings that give due consideration to the needs of pro se litigants; (2) the ability of the judge to hold pretrial conferences by telephone; (3) the use of scheduling orders under Page 6 the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure in order to limit discovery to that which is necessary for a full and fair determination of the proceeding; and (4) the appropriate use of site visits by the presiding judge to assist the court in rendering a decision." RULE 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS (a) Applicability. This rule applies in all proceedings under these rules, except as modified by provisions of the rules pertaining to particular proceedings. (b) Coordination of Proceedings. On motion of a party, or on the court's own motion, where the same violation or project involves multiple proceedings that have resulted or may result in separate hearings or appeals in the Environmental Court, or where different violations or projects involve significant common issues of law or fact, the court may advance, defer, coordinate, or combine proceedings and may make other orders that will promote expeditious and fair proceedings and avoid unnecessary costs or delay. (c) Discovery. Unless the parties otherwise agree, the court in a pretrial order issued under paragraph (d)(3) of this rule shall establish the type, sequence, and amount of discovery available under Rules 26-37 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure, limiting the discovery permitted to that which is necessary for a full and fair determination of the proceeding. (d) Pretrial Conference and Order. (1) The court shall hold a pretrial conference as soon as possible after the filing of the last pretrial memorandum required in a review of an administrative order or the last statement of questions required in an appeal or the time for filing either has passed. The court may hold subsequent conferences, on its own motion or at the request of a party, as necessary to promote the expeditious and fair disposition of the proceeding. Any conference may be scheduled by the court to be held by telephone. All unrepresented parties and counsel for all represented'parties must attend all conferences. Unless a party or counsel is excused by the court in advance of the scheduled date, failure to attend a conference may result in sanctions, including dismissal of the appeal or entry of default. The judge shall preside at the initial conference but may assign the case manager to conduct all, or specific portions, of any subsequent conference and report to the judge on any matters agreed upon and any matters in dispute. Motions may be scheduled to be heard at any conference held by the judge, and any conference or motion hearing may be recorded by audiotape or other electronic means with leave of the court. (2) At the initial conference, the following matters shall be considered, if applicable, and appropriate schedules shall be established: (i) the status of any stay that has previously been granted; (ii) issues of intervention and party status; (iii) whether to advance, defer, coordinate, or combine proceedings pursuant to subdivision (b) of this rule; (iv) whether to allow clarification of the statement of questions; and (v) the potential for dismissal of all or some issues or for summary judgment or other disposition of any Page 7 legal issue or issues before trial. At the initial or any subsequent conference, the following additional matters shall be considered, if applicable: (vi) whether to narrow the issues to be heard; (vii) the appropriate type, sequence and amount of discovery; (viii) the use of prefiled evidence and expert witnesses; (ix) whether a site visit is needed; (x) the use of alternative dispute resolution or other means of expediting the proceeding; and (xi) any other matter necessary to the expeditious and fair disposition of the proceeding. (3) In every case, the court shall issue one or more written orders under Rules 16, 16.2, or 26(f) of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure, as appropriate. The order or orders shall, at a minimum: (i) dispose of any issues determined at the conference and set a date for the hearing and disposition of any other pending issues raised; (ii) state the type, sequence, and amount of discovery to be conducted and provide a plan and schedule for the completion of discovery; (iii) affirm a schedule for any alternative dispute resolution process ordered or agreed upon under V.R.C.P.16.3; (iv) if prefiled evidence is to be used, contain appropriate orders concerning its use; (v) contain appropriate orders concerning the use of expert testimony at trial; (vi) contain appropriate orders governing a site visit, if any is to be conducted; and (vii) contain appropriate orders concerning trial scheduling. (e) Evidence. (1) Rules of Evidence. The Vermont Rules of Evidence shall be followed in all matters within the original jurisdiction of the court and in all appeals by trial de novo, except that evidence, not privileged, that is not admissible under the Rules of Evidence may be admitted in the discretion of the court if it is of a type commonly relied upon by reasonably prudent persons in the conduct of their affairs. (2) Prefiled Evidence. (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, prefiled evidence may be admitted as ordered by the court in a pretrial order issued pursuant to paragraph (d)(3) of this rule when a hearing will be expedited and the interests of the parties will not be prejudiced substantially. (B) Prefiled testimony and related exhibits will be admitted only if the witness is present and available for cross-examination, unless the court and the parties otherwise agree or the witness is unavailable as defined in Rule 804(a) of the Vermont Rules of Evidence. (3) Site Y'isits. One or more site visits may be conducted when appropriate to assist the court in rendering a decision. Reporter's Notes Page 8 Rule 2 sets forth procedural provisions that apply in all proceedings under the rules unless these general provisions are modified by specific provisions of the rules for particular proceedings. Rule 2(b) gives the court broad discretion to determine the sequence and possible coordination of separate hearings or appeals concerning the same violation or project or involving significant common questions of law or fact. See 10 V.S.A. § 8504(g). The rule is intended to give the court a flexible case management tool. Under V.R.C.P. 78(b), the court has discretion to hold a hearing on a motion under Rule 2(b) if appropriate. The rule does not directly address full consolidation of proceedings, which by virtue of V.R.C.P. 42(a) may be ordered only with the consent of the parties. Rule 2(d) provides that these matters are to be considered at the initial pretrial conference and may be disposed of or scheduled for disposition in a pretrial order. Rule 2(c) requires the court to establish the type, sequence and amount of discovery in a pretrial order issued under Rule 2(d)(3) unless the parties agree on discovery matters. The rule assumes that all discovery devices provided by V.R.C.P. 26-37 are potentially available in all proceedings under these rules but requires the court to determine the actual use of discovery in accordance with the "full and fair determination" standard of 4 V.S.A. §§ 1001(g)(3), 1004(b). The statutory directive to limit discovery calls for the court to order no more nor less discovery than is required to meet that standard. The court will also be guided by the provision of 4 V.S.A. § 1001(g)(1) calling for "expeditious proceedings that give due consideration to the needs of pro se litigants." Rule 2(d)(1) requires a pretrial conference to be held by the judge as soon as possible after the filing of the last pretrial memorandum required in a review of an administrative order or the last statement of questions required in an appeal and provides for subsequent conferences to be conducted by the judge or case manager, on the court's own motion or at the request of a party, as necessary to meet the statutory standard of fair and expeditious proceedings. See 4 V.S.A. § 1001(g). A case manager who conducts all or part of a conference does not decide or make recommendations to the court on pending questions but reports to the court on any questions resolved or narrowed by agreement at the conference and on the questions that remain in dispute. All Page 9 unrepresented parties and all counsel must attend any conferences unless previously excused by the court. As required by 4 V.S.A. § 1001(g)(2), the rule permits the court to hold conferences by telephone. With proper notice through the scheduling order or otherwise, motions may, but need not be, heard at a conference. Rule 2(d)(2) prioritizes the matters to be considered, requiring the status of stays, issues of party status, questions of sequencing, and grounds for dismissal, summary judgment in a proceeding under Rule 3 or 5, or other disposition of legal issues before trial in a proceeding under Rule 4 to be addressed at the initial conference. Other issues may be addressed at that conference or a subsequent conference. Note that the rule provides that "the potential" for motions is to be "considered," not that the motions are then to be heard. Rule 2(d)(1) provides that motions may be heard at any conference held by the judge. Motions may also be scheduled to be heard at any other time. Consideration of ADR under Rule 2(d)(2)(x) opens up the range of procedures available under V.R.C.P. 16.3, which include mediation, early neutral evaluation, binding arbitration, or any other method involving a neutral upon which the parties agree. Note that, unless the parties have agreed on ADR pursuant to V.R.C.P. 16.3(a)(2)(A), their participation can be ordered under V.R.C.P. 16.3(a)(3)(A), as simultaneously amended, only if the court finds that ADR "is necessary to serve the interests of the parties and the court in the fair, economical, and efficient resolution of the dispute." Rule 2(d)(2)(xi) provides the opportunity for the court to take any steps necessary to assure that the statutory directive to "give due consideration to the needs of pro se litigants" is followed. See 4 V.S.A. § 1001(g)(1). The issues considered at any conference may be disposed of by agreement or by order of the judge at a later date. Rule 2(d)(3) incorporates the provisions of V.R.C.P. 16, 16.2, and 26(f) concerning pretrial disposition and scheduling orders and requires at least one written order in every case. The order or orders define the issues to be determined and set the schedule for discovery, any further motions, alternative dispute resolution under V.R.C.P. 16.3 if appropriate, and ultimately trial. Rule 2(e)(1) simplifies 4 V.S.A. § 1003(a) (substantially repeated in former V.R.C.P. 76(d)(4)), providing that the Vermont Rules of Evidence apply unless the court admits unprivileged evidence that is otherwise inadmissible but "is of a type commonly Page 10 relied upon by reasonably prudent persons in the conduct of their affairs" —the standard set in 4 V.S.A. § 1003(a). Note that an amendment to V.R.E. 702, effective July 1, 2004, adopted the reliability analysis of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), as a basis for permitting expert testimony. Environmental Board decisions holding Daubert inapplicable in its proceedings predated that amendment. The discretion given the court to admit evidence otherwise inadmissible under the Rules of Evidence would permit it, in an appropriate case, to admit expert testimony that did not satisfy the Daubert standard. Other language of 4 V.S.A. § 1003(a) is omitted as adequately provided for in provisions of the Rules of Evidence covering matters such as the best evidence rule (V.R.E. 1001- 1008) and judicial notice (V.R.E. 201). Rule 2(e)(2)(A) permits the court to allow the use of prefiled evidence in a pretrial order under Rule 2(d)(3), subject to the limitation in subparagraph (B) that, except by agreement or unless a witness is "unavailable" as provided in V.R.E. 804(a), a witness must be available for cross-examination at the trial. The court's pretrial order will determine the scope of any pretrial evidence to be used and will set the terms of its format and the schedule for its submission. In effect, for testimonial evidence, the provision operates as an exception to the hearsay rule. The general standard, that the evidence must expedite the proceedings without prejudicing the parties, is taken from 4 V.S.A. § 1003(a). The rule is a significant departure from Environmental Board practice, in which prefiled direct and rebuttal testimony were used as matter of course in virtually every case. As a practical matter, with discovery available under these rules, the court will be able to balance the need and cost of discovery against the utility of prefiled testimony. Thus, the use of direct oral testimony by lay witnesses and the use of prefiled testimony for expert witnesses, which may be substantially less costly than depositions, may be preferable in appropriate cases. Rule 2(e)(3), consistent with 4 V.S.A. § 1001(g)(4), makes clear that the court may conduct a site visit or visits as an aid in reaching a decision. See V.R.E. 611(a). The evidentiary effect of any matters observed is to be determined in accordance with the Rules of Evidence. See V.R.E. 401-403; In re Quechee Lakes Corp., 154 Vt. 543, 551-52, 580 A.2d 957, 961-62 (1990) (findings may be grounded on knowledge acquired during site visit so long as observations are not the sole basis for the findings). Page 1 I mmary judgment but does not carry with it the time limits and of specific requirements of V.R.C.P. 56, which, as provided in Rule )(2), is inapplicable to cases under Rule 4. Consistent with past ractice, ADR pursuant to V.R.C.P. 16.3 will be ordered only if the rties agree or the court finds it necessary to "the fair, economical, a d efficient resolution of the dispute." See Reporter's Note to Rule 2(d)(x) above. The provisions of 10 V.S.A. § 8012(c) r uire that trial must be held within 30 days of the receipt of the req st for hearing unless continued for good cause and that the decisi must be issued within 20 days of the conclusion of the hearing a d within 60 days of receipt of the request, unless these times are xtended for good cause. Rules 4(d)(5) and (6) carry forward pro 'sions of former V.R.C.P. 76(d)(2), (5), with added language s cifying the relief available under 10 V.S.A. § 8012(b). Rule 4(e) is new. It provides a procedbTe for review of municipal solid waste orders under 24 V.S.A. § Ir parallel to Rule 4(d). RULE 5. APPEALS (a) Applicability of Rules. (1) This rule governs appeals to the Environmental Court from an act or decision of an appropriate municipal panel pursuant to 24 V.S.A. §§ 4471, 4472; from an act or decision of the secretary of the agency of natural resources, or a commissioner or department of the agency, under the provisions of law listed in 10 V.S.A. § 8503(a); from a district commission, or from a district coordinator jurisdictional opinion, under 10 V.S.A., ch. 151; and from decisions of the secretary of the agency of agriculture, food and markets pursuant to 6 V.S.A. §§ 4855, 4861. (2) Except as modified by this rule and by subdivisions (b)-(e) of Rule 2, the Vermont Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure, so far as applicable, govem all proceedings under this rule. (b) Notice of Appeal. (1) Filing the Notice of Appeal. An appeal under this rule shall be taken by filing with the clerk of the Environmental Court by certified mail or other means a notice of appeal containing the items required in paragraph (3) of this subdivision within 30 days of the date of the act, decision, or jurisdictional opinion appealed from, unless the court extends the time as provided in Rule 4 of the Vermont Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Page 18 appellant shall pay to the clerk with the notice of appeal any required entry fee. If a notice of appeal is mistakenly filed with the tribunal appealed from, or the Natural Resources Board, or either of its panels or its predecessor boards, the appropriate officer of the tribunal, board, or panel shall note thereon the date on which it was received and shall promptly transmit it to the clerk of the Environmental Court, and it shall be deemed filed with the Environmental Court on the date so noted. Failure of an appellant to take any step other than the timely filing of the notice of appeal does not affect the validity of the appeal but is ground only for such action as the court deems appropriate, which may include dismissal of the appeal. (2) Cross- or Additional Appeals. If a timely notice of appeal is filed, any other person entitled to appeal may file a notice of appeal within 14 days of the date on which the statement of questions is required to be filed pursuant to Rule 5(f), or within the time otherwise prescribed by this rule, whichever period last expires, unless the court extends the time as provided in Rule 4 of the Vermont Rules of Appellate Procedure. (3) Contents of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal must specify the party or parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act, order, or decision appealed from; must name the court to which the appeal is taken; and must be signed by the appellant or the appellant's attorney. In addition, the notice of appeal must give the address or location and a description of the property or development with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant for any permit involved in the appeal. An appeal will not be dismissed for informality of form or title of the notice of appeal, or for failure to name a party whose intent to appeal is otherwise clear from the notice. (4) Service. (A) Appeal fr•arn an Appropriate Municipal Panel. Upon the filing of a notice of appeal from an act or decision of an appropriate municipal panel, the appellant shall at the same time mail a copy of the notice of appeal to the clerk or other appropriate officer of the panel. Upon receipt of the copy of the notice of appeal, the clerk or other officer shall, within five working days, provide to the appellant a list of interested persons, with instructions to serve a copy of the notice upon each of them by certified mail. A copy of the notice shall thereupon be served by the appellant by certified mail upon each interested person. (B) Appeal fr-onz the Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources, a District Commission, or. a District Coordinator. Upon the filing of a notice of appeal from an act or decision of the secretary of the agency of natural resources, a district commission, or a district coordinator, the appellant shall serve a copy of the notice of appeal in accordance with Rule 5 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure upon the secretary, district commission, or district coordinator as appropriate and upon any party by right as defined in 10 V.S.A. § 8502(5), the Page 19 Natural Resources Board, and every other person to whom notice of the filing of an appeal is required to be given by 10 V.S.A. § 8504(c) or (e), as appropriate. In addition, if the appeal is from an act or decision of the secretary or a district commission, the appellant shall publish a copy of the notice of appeal not more than 10 days after serving the notice as required under this subparagraph, at the appellant's expense, in a newspaper of general circulation in the area of the project which is the subject of the act or decision appealed from. (C) Appeal from the Secretary of Agriculture. If the appeal is from a decision of the secretary of the agency of agriculture, food and markets under 6 V.S.A. § 4855, the appellant shall serve a copy of the notice of appeal upon the secretary. If the appeal is from a decision or ruling of the secretary under 6 V.S.A. § 4861, the appellant shall serve a copy of the notice upon the secretary, the applicant if other than the appellant, and any person entitled under rules adopted by the secretary to receive individual notice of an animal waste permit hearing pursuant to 6 V.S.A. § 4858. (c) Appearance. An appellant enters an appearance by filing a notice of appeal as provided in subdivision (b) of this rule. Any other person may enter an appearance within 20 days after the date on which notice of filing of the last notice of appeal to be filed was served, or, if necessary, published pursuant to subparagraph (b)(4)(B) of this rule, by filing a written notice of appearance with the clerk and by serving the notice of appearance in accordance with Rule 5 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure; provided that any person enumerated in 10 V.S.A. § 8504(n)(1)-(3) may file and serve an appearance in a timely fashion. Any other person who has not previously entered an appearance as provided in this paragraph may enter an appearance by filing a timely motion to intervene. (d) Claims and Challenges of Party Status. (1) Appeals of Interlocutoi)- District Connnission Part}- Status Decisions. Any parry in a proceeding before a district commission, or any person denied party status in such a proceeding, may move in the Fnvironmental Court for an appeal of an interlocutory decision of the district commission granting or denying party status pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c). The motion, together with a notice of appeal, must be filed and served as provided in subdivision (b) of this rule within ten days after the decision of the district commission appealed from, except that the motion and notice need not be served by publication. The court may grant the motion and hear the appeal if it determines that review will materially advance the application process before the district commission. The court shall expedite hearing and determination of the motion and appeal. The provisions of Rule 2 apply to appeals under this paragraph only as ordered by the court. (2) Claims and Challenges of Part), Status in an Appeal from a Final Decision. An appellant who claims party status as a person aggrieved pursuant to 6 V.S.A. § 4855 Page 20 or 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a) and is not denied that status by 10 V.S.A. § 8504(d)(1), or an appellant who claims party status as an interested person pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1), will be automatically accorded that status when the notice of appeal is filed unless the court otherwise determines on motion to dismiss a party. An appellant who claims party status under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(2), (d)(2), or (e)(2) and who has not sought interlocutory relief pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subdivision must assert that claim by motion filed with the notice of appeal. Any other person who appears as provided in paragraph (1) of this subdivision will be accorded party status unless the court otherwise determines on its own motion, on motion to dismiss a party, or on a motion to intervene. (e) Stay. Unless the act or decision appealed from is automatically stayed pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8504(f)(1) by the filing of the appeal or a stay has been granted by the district commission pursuant to10 V.S.A. § 6086(f), the court, after the notice of appeal has been filed may, on its own motion, or on motion of a party, stay the act or decision and make such other orders as are necessary to preserve the rights of the parties upon such terms and conditions as are just. When the appeal is from the issuance of a permit pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4449, unless the decision appealed from is automatically stayed pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8504(f)(1)(B), the permit shall not take effect until the earlier of 15 days from the date of filing of the notice of appeal or the date of a ruling by the court under this subdivision on whether to issue a stay. (0 Statement of Questions. Within 20 days after the filing of the notice of appeal, the appellant shall file with the clerk of the Environmental Court a statement of the questions that the appellant desires to have determined. The statement shall be served in accordance with Rule 5 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure. No response to the statement of questions shall be filed. The appellant may not raise any question on the appeal not presented in the statement as filed, unless otherwise ordered by the court in a pretrial order entered pursuant to subdivision (d) of Rule 2. The statement is subject to a motion to clarify or dismiss some or all of the questions. (g) Trial De Novo; Pretrial Order. All appeals under this rule shall be by trial de novo, following a pretrial conference and order issued pursuant to subdivision (d) of Rule 2, except as provided in subdivision (h) of this rule. In an appeal by trial de novo, all questions of law or fact as to which review is available shall be tried to the court, which shall apply the substantive standards that were applicable before the tribunal appealed from. (h) Appeals to the Environmental Court on the Record. (1) From an Appropriate Municipal Panel. (A) An appeal from an appropriate municipal panel from which appeals may be on the record pursuant to 24 V.S.A. §§ 4471 and 4472 shall be governed by Rules 10-12.1 of the Vermont Rules of Appellate Procedure so far as applicable and except as modified by this rule. The record on appeal shall consist of the original papers filed with the municipal panel; any writings or exhibits considered by the panel in reaching the decision appealed from; the electronic Page 21 recording of the proceedings certified by the presiding officer of the municipal panel as the full, true and correct record of the proceedings; and the transcript of the proceedings if any. Within 30 days after the filing of the notice of appeal, the clerk or other appropriate officer of the municipal panel shall transmit the papers and exhibits filed to the clerk of the Environmental Court in the manner provided in Rule I I(b) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Except as hereinafter provided, the electronic recording will serve without transcript as the record of the proceedings on appeal in all matters in which the total elapsed time for all recorded proceedings does not exceed 12 hours. In such a case, the operator of the equipment shall send a copy of the electronic recording to the Environmental Court and shall bill the appellant for the copy. (B) In any such matter in which a party has ordered a transcript and has agreed to pay the cost of copies of the transcript for opposing parties and, unless otherwise ordered by the court, in any matter in which the total elapsed time for all recorded proceedings exceeds 12 hours, the transcript, ordered and prepared as provided in subparagraph (C) of this paragraph, will serve as the record of proceedings. (C) When a transcript is to be ordered, the party ordering it, within ten days after filing the notice of appeal, shall send to the municipal panel an order for a transcript of all parts of the proceedings that are relevant to the issues that the appellant intends to raise in the statement of questions. A copy of the order shall be served on the clerk of the Environmental Court and all persons upon whom copies the notice of appeal have been served pursuant to subdivision (b) of this rule. It shall thereupon be the responsibility of the municipal panel to cause a transcript to be made by an individual on a list appointed by the Court Administrator pursuant to paragraph (8) of Administrative Order No. 19 to transcribe electronic recordings for use in court proceedings. The party ordering the transcript shall pay to the municipal panel at the time of ordering the deposit amount required under Administrative Order No. 28. (2) Fran the Commissioner of Forests, Parks, and Recreation. An appeal from a decision of the commissioner of forests, parks, and recreation under 10 V.S.A. § 2625(f) shall be on the record of the proceedings before the commissioner. Within 30 days after the filing of the notice of appeal, the commissioner shall transmit the papers and exhibits filed to the clerk of the Environmental Court in the manner provided in Rule I I (b) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. If those proceedings have been electronically recorded, the provisions of paragraph (1) of this subdivision concerning electronic recording apply. (i) Remand for Reconsideration. At the request of the tribunal appealed from, the court, at any time prior to judgment, may remand the case to that tribunal for its reconsideration. (j) Judgment. The order of the court may affirm, reverse, or modify the decision of the Page 22 tribunal appealed from, may remand the case for further proceedings consistent with the order of the court, and may expressly set forth conditions and restrictions with which the parties must comply. (k) Appeals to the Supreme Court. (1) Rules Applicable. Except as modified by this subdivision, the Vermont Rules of Appellate Procedure, so far as applicable, shall govern all proceedings under this subdivision. (2) Filing and Service. An appeal from a decision in a proceeding in the Environmental Court under this rule shall be taken by filing with the clerk of the Environmental Court a notice of appeal in the form provided in paragraph (3) of this subdivision within 30 days of the date of the decision appealed from, unless the Environmental Court extends the time as provided in Rule 4 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. The appellant shall pay to the clerk of the Environmental Court any required entry fee with the notice of appeal. The appellant shall serve a copy of the notice upon the clerk of the Supreme Court and upon counsel of record of each person that appeared in the Environmental Court and held party status at the time when the decision appealed from was rendered. (3) Contents of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal must specify the parry or parties taking the appeal; must designate the judgment, order, or part thereof appealed from; must name the court to which the appeal is taken; and must be signed by the appellant or the appellant's attorney. In addition, the notice of appeal must give the address and a description of the property or development with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant.for any permit involved in the appeal and must set forth facts showing that the appellant is entitled to appeal pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8505(a)(1) or (2) or shall be accompanied by a motion requesting the Supreme Court to allow the appeal on the grounds specified in 10 V.S.A. § 8505(a)(3). (4) Issues on Appeal. An objection that was not raised before the Environmental Court may not be considered by the Supreme Court, unless the failure or neglect to raise that objection is excused by the Supreme Court because of extraordinary circumstances. (5) Interlocutoty Decisions. An appeal from a decision of the Environmental Court granting or denying party status as provided in subdivision (d) of this rule or issuing a stay pursuant to subdivision (e) of this rule may be taken before final judgment as provided in Rule 5 of the Vermont Rules of Appellate Procedure. Reporter's Notes Rule 5 is a consolidated rule for all appeals to the Environmental Court under 10 V.S.A., ch. 220, enacted by Act 115 Page 23 so far as applicable, gov%such oceedings except as modified by provisions of subdivided for consistency with 10 V.S.A. § 8505 and otherof this rule. RULE 6. DEFINITIONS (a) Unless specified to the contrary, or indicated otherwise in the context: (1)The words "court," "judge," or similar terms, when used in these rules and in provisions of the Vermont Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure incorporated in these rules shall mean the Environmental Court or one of the judges of that court. (2) The word "clerk" when used in these rules and in provisions of the Vermont Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure incorporated in these rules shall mean the clerk of the Environmental Court. (3) The words "case manager" when used in these rules shall mean a case manager provided to the Environmental Court pursuant to 4 V.S.A. § 1001(f). (4) The word "tribunal" means an officer, agency, department, board, panel, or other body from which an appeal lies under these rules. (b) Other terms used in these rules shall have the meanings ascribed to them in 6 V.S.A. §§ 4802, 4861; 10 V.S.A. §§ 8002, 8502; and 24 V.S.A. §§ 4303, 4465(b). Reporter's Notes Rules 6(a)(1) and (2) make clear that the terms "court" and similar terms, and the term "clerk," as used in provisions of the Civil or Appellate Rules that are incorporated in these rules by reference refer to the Environmental Court and its judge or clerk. Note that similar provision for the use of these terms in appeals to the Supreme Court is made in V.R.A.P. 13(b). Rule 6(a)(3) makes clear that "case manager" refers to the appropriate official of the Environmental Court provided pursuant to statute. The definition of "tribunal" in Rule 6(a)(4) is consistent with its use in 10 V.S.A. § 8504(h). Rule 6(b) incorporates statutory definitions of various critical terms. The term "secretary" as defined in 6 V.S.A. § 4802 for purposes of 6 V.S.A., ch. 215, and the term "a person aggrieved" as defined in 6 V.S.A. § 4861 are relevant to appeals under Rule 5. Terms defined in 10 V.S.A. § 8002 that may be Page 31 relevant to enforcement actions under Rule 4 include "person," "permit," "respondent," `secretary," and "violation." Terms defined in 10 V.S.A. § 8502 that may be relevant to appeals under Rule 5 include "district commission," "district coordinator," "natural resources board," "party by right," "person," "person aggrieved," and "secretary." Terms defined in 24 V.S.A. § 4303 that may be relevant to appeals under Rule 5 include "appropriate municipal panel," "legislative body," "municipality," and "person." The term "interested person" as defined in 24 V.S.A. § 4465(b) is relevant to appeals under Rule 5. RULE 7. TITLE These rules may be known and cited as the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. Reporter's Notes The proper abbreviated citation form for these rules is "V.R.E.C.P." RULE 8. EFFECTIVE DATE (a) Effective Date. These rules will take effect on February 21, 2005. They govern all proceedings in actions or appeals brought after they take effect and also all further proceedings in actions or appeals then pending, except to the extent that in the opinion of the court their application in a particular action or appeal pending when the rules take effect would not be feasible or would work injustice, in which event the former procedure applies. (b) Effective Date of Amendments. Amendments to these rules will take effect on the day specified in the order adopting them. They govern all proceedings in actions or appeals brought after they take effect and also all further proceedings in actions or appeals then pending, except to the extent that in the opinion of the court their application in a particular action or appeal pending when they take effect would not be feasible or would work injustice, in which event the former proce dure applies. Reporter's Notes This rule is based on V.R.C.P. 86. It makes clear both for the rules as originally promulgated and for any subsequent amendments that the court has discretion to mold new provisions to the circumstances in actions or appeals pending at the effective date. Page 32 CITY OF SOUTH BU LINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 11, 2005 John Larkin Larkin Realty 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re- Spencer Terminal Holdings Dear Mr. Larkin: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BU LINGTON DEPARTMENT OF LANNE"4O & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 11, 2005 Ian Jewkes Krebs & Lansing 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings Dear Mr. Jewkes: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. STEVEN F. STITZEL PATTI R. PAGE* ROBERT E.FLETCHER JOSEPH S. McLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE AMANDA S. E. LAFFERTY (*ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y) STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119 WRITER'S E-MAIL(ALAFFERTY@FIRMSPF.COM) WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-2552 February 9, 2005 Jackie Stevens, Clerk Environmental Court 255 North Main Street, Ste 2 Barre, VT 05641-4145 Re: Appeal of Greco Docket No. Dear Jackie: JILL E. SPINELLI WILL S. BAKER In connection with the above -referenced matter, please find for filing my Entry of Appearance. I am also writing to inform the Court that, on January 17, 2005, the City of South Burlington Development Review Board voted to reopen its hearing on the application that is the subject of this appeal and to reconsider its decision on said application. Therefore, the Development Review Board still has jurisdiction over said application. Please call with questions. Thank you. Sincerely, ti� "'d-a Amanda S. E. ASEL/br son5624.cor Enclosure CC: Raymond Belair / Joseph and Mary Greco David and Heather Main Kenneth W. and Joanne Perkins Peter E. and Leslie Black Plumeau Paul and Cheryl Houchens Donna Lee Diane Naomi Roen Laf fert STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT RE: APPEAL OF GRECO, et al. ) DOCKET NO. 12-1-05 Vtec ENTRY OF APPEARANCE NOW COMES AMANDA S. E. LAFFERTY, of the firm Stitzel, Page & Fletcher, P.C., and hereby enters her appearance in the above - referenced matter by and on behalf of the City of South Burlington. DATED at Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, this 9tn day of February, 2005. son2065.1iteoa STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171BATTERYSTREET PO. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 0540E-1507 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. Amanda S. E. Lafferty CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONI' 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 5, 2004 Ian Jewkes Krebs & Lansing 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Essex Junction, VT 05446 Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings Dear Mr. Jewkes: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, November 9, 2004 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. ;S! NO COMMUTE! Learn $2000-$4000/week from Call for free message, ',-3475. (AAN CAN) STORE: Crystals Jewelry wrch Street upstairs. able and profitable. Great . $35,000. 310-6037. t & found [T: Have you seen He's white w/orange it. Last seen near the sh Resort area. He's nissed. 802-583-2204 iouncements 'E ADOPTION: gay couple seek to n infant, under age irs. Couple seeks a 'Je brother of three sters, now aged 4, years old. Beautiful i rural, central :, set on 30 acres of /2 ponds and a gar- pLoyment: Clinical orker and small busi- ner. ail any replies to bjr33@aot.com 'Y IN JOURNALISM: ,my for Alternative n, established by e this one to promote n the alternative press, nted journalists and college seniors and paid summer writing t Northwestern 's Medill School of i. The eight -week pro- e 19 - August 14, s to recruit talented from diverse back - id train them in maga- feature writing. Ten :s will be chosen and ) plus housing and Nances. For informa- :he website at .org/aaj or write for Lion: Academy for Journalism, am University, Medill Journalism, 1845 d., Evanston, IL aiL attacademy@ rn.edu. Application !bruary 11, 2005. rn University is an rtunity educator ter. (AAN CAN) ,DOPTION: Married seek to adopt an er age of 2-years. classified@sevendaysvt.com I SEVEN DAYS I january 26-february 02, 2005 1 Mclassifieds 29B or write for an application: Academy for Alternative Journalism, Northwestern University, Medill School of Journalism, 1845 Sheridan Rd, Evanston, IL 60208. Email attacademy@northwestern.edu. Application deadline: February 11, 2005. Northwestern Univer- sity is an equal opportunity edu- cator and employer. (AAN CAN) ► entertainment EXOTICA DANCERS featuring girls going wild for your next birthday, bachelor party or fun - on -one show. 802-658-1464. New talent welcome. HOT BODIES: The best in adult entertainment. Bachelor, bache- lorette, birthdays, one-on-one shows. 652-0003. ► professional SVCS. AFFORDABLE AUTO REPAIR: Rust, accidents, painting, exhaust, brakes, cooling systems, tune-ups. Free estimates. $30/hour. Call Paul, 658-0302. ATTENTION SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS: Flexible full -service bookkeeping and QuickBooks10 setup, training and trouble- shooting to suit your time and needs. Barb Grogard, 878-6015. COMPUTER PROBLEMS? Call VPC Solutions, 434-6539 (Mon - Sun 7 a.m. - 9 p.m.). Spyware, viruses, troubleshooting, installa- tions, upgrades, networking, web design etc. Visit our website, www.vermontpcsotutions.com. ► computer svcs. A+ CERTIFIED COMPUTER REPAIR by excellent techni- cians. Low rates, fast turn- around. Refurbished computers available. ReCycle North Tech Services, 266 Pine St., Burlington, 658-4143 ext. 23. COMPUTER REPAIRS AND UPGRADES: PCs, Macs, network- ing, web design, tutoring, digi- CLASSI FI EDSLISTI NGS ► buy this stuff $1! RECORD SALE $1! 1500 + Classical LP's, opera, organ, early music to 20th century. 11 Maple St., Essex Junction (near Five Corners). Monday - Saturday, 9 a.m. - 5 p.m. FREE 4-ROOM DIRECTV SYS- TEM: Includes standard installa- tion. 3-months free HBO and Cinemax. Access to over 225 channels! Limited -time offer. S&H, restrictions apply. 800-877- 1251. (AAN CAN) GREAT SUITS for interviews, new jobs or special occasions. Many styles and sizes, $10. Blazers, jackets and wool shirts, 50%u off. SCHIP's Treasure Resale Shop, 5404 Shelburne Road, Shelburne. 985-3595. TAMA ROCK -STAR 5-piece drumset with Zildjian and Sabian cymbals. All hardware included. Asking $650. 802-796-3488 or srbenjamin@gmaiL.com TEACHER STUFF: Mostly grades 4-6. Chapter books w/multiple copies, unit guides, lesson plans, bulletin board stuff. Excellent condition. Great for beginning teacher. Priced individually or $200 takes all. 864-6094. TOOLS: Craftsman table saw (needs new fence), detail sander by Dremel, old drills by Shoperaft & Bosch, square fin- ishing sanders by Dewalt & Makita, cement laying tools, assorted hand tools (some antiques). Please cat[ 233-5621. ► artists wanted ARTIST MENTOR NEEDED to work w/a full-time designer/ builder during a two -week work- shop, February -March. Responsi- bilities include: reviewing goals, meeting/faxing during progress (sometimes daily), making observations and suggestions. A well -developed style focusing on color and pattern and desire to teach a must. Please be close to Burlington or have fax machine. Small stipend avail. Please call if interested, 233-5621. ► furniture 4 CHAIRS: Dining, wooden w/wicker seats. Bent wood arms, incl. nice custom covers. Great condition. $30O/OBO. Please cal[ 233-5621. COUCH FOR SALE: Floral pat- tern, excellent condition. Bought for $1500. Asking $750/OBO. Cal[ 879-1926. ► free 1988 WELLCRAFT ECLIPSE: ► music services COSMIC HILL RECORDING: MIDI and production services. Years of experience in writing, playing, recording and produc- tion. Dedicated to making your music sound great. $25 per hour. 496-3166. Moretown, VT. QUESTION MARK PRODUC- TIONS: Audio engineering/pro- duction, live sound, recording. 802-578-9356. ► musicians wanted DJ: Spirit of Ethan Allen needs DJ for weddings and parties. Need person who is entertaining, knows music and electronics. 802-862-8300. DRUMMER WANTED: Industrial/Martial/Heavy. Influences: Swans, Blood Axis, Neurosis, etc. Avail. for touring in Spring '05. 244-5965. KEYBOARDIST WANTED FOR 5- PIECE BAND. Originals and cov- ers. Rock and R & B. For audi- tion, leave message at 802- 734-0602. SINGER SEEKS MUSICIANS. Must be extremely versatile. Dare to be different and willing to offend. dicknifken@yahoo.com. WANTED: LEAD SINGER for ready gigging local rock band. Influences: 3 Doors Down, Stone Temple Pilots and much more. 802-288-1528. ► music instruct. GUITAR: ALL styles/levels. Emphasis on developing strong technique, thorough musician- ship, personal style. Paul Asbel[ (Unknown Blues Band, Kiliman- jaro, Sneakers Jazz Band, etc.), 862-7696, www.paulasbeL[.com. GUITAR: Berklee graduate with classical background offers Les- sons in guitar, theory and ear training. Individualized, step-by- step approach. I enjoy teaching all ages/styles/levels. Call Rick Belford at 864-7195. GUITAR INSTRUCTION NOW AVAILABLE at Burlington Guitar and Amp, 202 Main St., Burling- ton. Accepting all Levels with emphasis on improvisation, technique, ear training and musicianship. Bob Wagner, 324-2895. GUITAR LESSONS with Bill Mullins (Barbacoa, Chrome Cowboys). All levels and styles welcome. 310-6013 JOY AND CREATMTY! Classical Jazz and Free Improvisation piano lessons. All ages, all Lev- els. William Michael, 802-899- 6700 or 355-6234. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVEL- OPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on February 15, 2005, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the fol- lowing: 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Reconsider preliminary plat application #SD- 04-61 and final plat application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings for a planned unit development consisting of. 1) construction of a 26,000 sq. ft distribution and related storage building with more than 15% GFA in office use for the same tenant as 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200-foot wide "no -construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south locat- ed at the end of Dubois Drive. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: Final plat application #SD-05-03 of Edgar Welch to amend a planned unit development consisting of. 1) a 12,590 sq. ft building which includes one (1) dwelling unit and is approved for 8996 sq. ft of retail space, 2594 sq. ft of general office space, and 1000 sq. ft for retail, general office or indoor recreational uses, 2) an 1800 sq. ft building approved for retail or indoor recreational uses, and 3) an accessory building. The amendment consists of site modifications, 340 Dorset Street. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary plat application #SD-05-07 and final plat application #SD-05-08 of Charles & Patricia Shea to subdivide a 9.14 acre parcel developed with a single family dwelling into four (4) lots of 7.01 acres (lot #1), 0.74 acres (lot #2), 0.69 acres (lot #3), and 0.70 acres (lot 44), 680 Nowland Farm Road. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board January 26, 2005 ► support groups DON'T SEE A SUPPORT group here that meets your needs? Call United Way GET -INFO (a confi- dential help line) 652-4636, Monday -Friday, 8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. WnPvciT v rno QTTn1I F^ l CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: Brian Robertson, Associate Planner � 1-yu RE: SD-04-61 and SD-04-64 Date: February 11, 2005 Cc: Ian Jewkes Agenda #6 Proiect Description Spencer Terminal Holdings, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting reconsideration of a preliminary plat and final plat decision for a planned unit development consisting of 1) construction of a 26,000 sq ft distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no -construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south located at the end of Dubois Drive. The applicant is requesting reconsideration of condition #15, which was approved as follows: 15) The restrictions on truck vehicle trip ends on the subject property shall be as follows: 12:00 A.M - 5:59A.M. 6:00 A.M. —11:00 P.M 11:01 P.M —11:59 P.M. Monday no truck operations no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends Tuesday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends vehicle trip ends Wednesday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends vehicle trip ends Thursday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends vehicle trip ends Friday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends vehicle trip ends Saturday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions no truck operations vehicle trip ends 6:00 A.M - 12:00 P.M no trucking operations 12:01 P.M —11:59 P.M. Sunday no truck operations no truck operations no truck operations The applicant has stated that it is concerned about compliance with the approved time limitations in the case of an emergency or unforeseen event, such as weather —related conditions. The City Attorney is currently reviewing this request, and will provide the Development Review Board with the legal parameters to use in making their decision at the meeting. In addition to the reconsideration, this application has another significant problem. During the original approval process, the co -applicant of the property to the south (Mary Dubois) sold the property to another party (John Larkin). This was the property that was receiving the 200' wide buffer from the property the applicant is proposing to develop. The new owner of the property to the south has not signed the application as a co -applicant, nor has he indicated he is going to sign the application. The subject application involves both properties, so without the signature of the owner of the property to the south, the Development Review Board does not have the jurisdiction to approve this project. Thus, this project would be denied altogether. l CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: Interested Persons FROM: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer DATE: January 26, 2005 RE: Reconsideration of Spencer Terminal Holdings Application The Development Review Board received the enclosed'Motion to Reconsider from the Applicant, Spencer Terminal Holdings, in connection with Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-61 and Final Plat Application #SD-04-64. The Board, at it's 2/18/05 meeting, voted to reconsider their decision in this matter. A public hearing is being warned (copy enclosed) for Tuesday February 15, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at which time the Board will determine whether they will make any change(s) to Condition #15. JosF_PH D. FALCON ATTORNEY AT LAW P. O. BOX 257, 10729 ROUTE 116 HINESBURG, VT 05461 (802) 482-2137 FAX (802) 482-2138 EMAIL Jfallon_Wmadrlver.com January 4, 2005 VIA EMAIL & FIRST-CLASS MAIL Mr. John Dinklage, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Spencer Terminal Holdings - 596 Meadowland Drive - South Burlington Development Review Board Findings of Fact & Decision dated 12/22/04 Dear Mr. Dinklage: I represent Spencer Terminal Holdings. This letter is by way of respectfully requesting that the Development Review Board reconsider Paragraph 15 of its Decision concerning restrictions on truck vehicle trip ends and hours of operation. As noted by my client's representative during the proceedings, it is imperative that no restrictions be placed on vehicle trip ends and hours of operation in conjunction with my client's business. Would you be kind enough to place this matter on your agenda at the earliest possible date. Should you wish me to notify other interested parties, I would be happy to do so once I have the appropriate names and addresses. Thank you for giving this matter your kind attention. Very yours, Joseph D. Fallon JDF:sjl cc: Mr. William Spencer, Spencer Terminal Holdings Mr. Ian Jewkes, Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Raymond Belair, City of South Burlington Joseph D. Fallon P.O. Box 257 Hinesburg, VT 05461 Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Munson Earth Moving 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 Larry & Ginette Brainard 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Anthony & Diane Graziano 34 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 John & Susan Hood 28 Dubois Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 John Larkin 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Mark Neagley 113 Heritage Lane Shelburne, VT 05482 Mark Behr 38 Moss Glen Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 Thomas E. Chase PO Box 2283 South Burlington, VT 05407 Diane J. Wessel 70 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Donna Lee 30 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Paul & Charyl Houchens 36 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Robert & Linda O'Kelly 30 Dubois Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Peter Plumeau 33 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Elaine & Michael O'Grady 31 Dubois Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Jon Wilkinson 434 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Green Acres, Inc. PO Box 2123 South Burlington, VT Scott & Roberta Pennington 26 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Nicholas & Juli Beth Hinds 32 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 David & Heather Main 38 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Ralph & Jeanette Mitchell 32 Dubois Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Ian Jewkes Krebs & Lansing 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Ken Perkins 39 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 PLEASE PRINT CLEA RL Y!!!!! NAME ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST Alt Blue,& (f#,jrrm4,y Pk-ea-r,..,r "-. 0/7 soco --V e io c-Qc-> t4 n t. zd7L,-" ILA Ud f-CeAj 3's F<Vkof# Urcl�, -/—e-VWA-tr� iA6,/c-,Ke4%s 11(o -1) P,\j �'l YA 0,J 38 40 k V•�ae cfe-r o 5 -L, z.,o Ll o x /(,,V /Miv 64c,)-J. Vl-, 17)6- ulp., 5,-,o SG odLT7t,5m(:,7— c fJef-K Tt?ju t.- tj"\I, Chas �.e. 4fr-;Ver SIGN IN SHEET MEETING.. DATE PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY!!!!! NAME ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST 4Z Alo .4 ke Z" c' � w-d&l: —k 7 -1 --tax. 44�1217jee -ki- :2a Z3g12kle4' sfi �' , tj P,.,,re Cr- G(LL Scqkveht-:K ro. Box (lqo Qv xw" 6T04) J)S402. lb S'ls -r r" -A r LoKe. lezlx--7) ale" illy 70AIV VITI -03 06-eeZeY .5 T fn d ti %//;4.'jAj4rY Cor4a4z$J so T L3 V, ±ck-, 00, 'I Viv a Lt- r, i er. Le. spF'Q ex. 0- TUA 1 w4y, SIGN JN SHEET MEET!NG:'_,DeN'EL_C�V-�E' G � DATE: 0- 9' (DA PLEASC PRINT CLE,4RLY!!!!! NAME ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST r;J}tJ :16i/y1 i -21 8 x1`I -A a •" 6 Li .a C' S. r 36 L / J tL.._ Sy r4 itt+i7✓" l`, 1� 1 r'f•LY f 1 _I �i�R,�,(I, D I-�! dT- ,J� Va,rI 2,• o. , fi'SY�,+,iY1V dtif`•%wit 'ui'a� I JOSEPH D. FAI EON ATTORNEY AT LAW P. O. BOX 257, 10729 ROUTE 116 HINESBURG, VT 05461 (802) 482-2137 FAX (802) 482-2138 EMAIL JfallOn@madriver.cOm January 4, 2005 VIA EMAIL & FIRST-CLASS MAIL Mr. John Dinklage, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Spencer Terminal Holdings - 596 Meadowland Drive - South Burlington Development Review Board Findings of Fact & Decision dated 12/22/04 Dear Mr. Dinklage: I represent. Spencer Terminal Holdings. This letter is by way of respectfully requesting that the Development Review Board reconsider Paragraph 15 of its Decision concerning restrictions on truck vehicle trip ends and hours of operation. As noted by my client's representative during the proceedings, it is imperative that no restrictions be placed on vehicle trip ends and hours of operation in conjunction with my client's business. Would you be kind enough to place this matter on your agenda at the earliest possible date. Should you wish me to notify other interested parties, I would be happy to do so once I have the appropriate names and addresses. Thank you for giving this matter your kind attention. 4Y, urs, Joseph D. Fallon JDF:sjl cc: Mr. William Spencer, Spencer Terminal Holdings Mr. Ian Jewkes, Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Raymond Belair, City of South Burlington C MEMORANDUM To: Development Review Board From: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings, #SD-04-61 and SD-04-64 Date: December 10, 2004 Deliberations on the above referenced project will continue at 8:00 pm on Tuesday, December 14th in the small upstairs conference room. Enclosed is a copy of the draft decision which includes the changes agreed upon at the last meeting. I have not yet received Amanda's changes. CITY of SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT of PLANNING & ZONING SPENCER TERMINAL HOLDINGS - 596 MEADOWLAND DRIVE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD-04-61 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-04-64 FINDINGS of FACT & DECISION Spencer Terminal Holdings, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking preliminary and final plat approval for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) construction of a 26,000 sq ft distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no -construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south located at the end of Dubois Drive. The Development Review Board held public hearings on September 21, 2004, October 19, 2004 and November 9, 2004. Ian Jewkes represented the applicant. Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearings and the plans and supporting materials in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS of FACT The applicant is seeking preliminary and final plat approval for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) construction of a 26,000 sq ft distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no - construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south located at the end of Dubois Drive. 2. The owners of record of the subject properties are Summer Ice Joint Venture and Marie Dubois. 3. The subject properties are located in the Industrial & Open Space (10) Zoning District, the North Scenic View Protection Overlay District and the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. 4. The plans consist of an ten (2) page set of plans, page two (2) entitled, "PUD Plat Meadowland Business Park Lands of Homer and Marie Dubois Meadowland Drive South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated October 16, 2004. - 1 - Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements 10 Zoning District Required Proposed A Min. Lot Size 3 acres 20.2 acres A Max. Density n/a n/a A Max. Building Coverage 30% 2.7% Max. Overall Coverage 50% 19.8% Min. Front Setback 50 ft. 50 ft. Min. Side Setback 35 ft. 280 ft. Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. 200 ft. A Max. Building Height _ 35 ft. 24 ft. zoning compliance n/a no residential units proposed SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. The entire Meadowland Business Park has an approved water allocation, which applies to this proposed project. In addition, the water infrastructure has already been installed, so it is only a matter of connecting this building to the system. The Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department is in the process of reviewing the plans. His comments should be available for the meeting. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The subdivision received a 30,345 gallon per day sewer allocation. This allocation is still in effect. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The proposed grading plan is outlined on sheet SP-3 of the plans and the erosion control details are outlined on sheet D-3 of the plans. -2- The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to this property is proposed via two (2) access drives off of Meadowland Drive: a 26' wide drive on the westerly side of the proposed building and a 24' wide drive on the easterly side of the proposed building. Both of these access drives are proposed for ingress and egress. The two proposed access drives are at least 400' apart, which is compliance with Section 15.12(E) of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to Section 15.12(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the easterly access drive should be aligned with Bowdoin Street, on the opposite side of Meadowland Drive. The proposed truck parking lots are very large to accommodate the large trucks this site will cater to. Therefore, circulation on the site will not be an issue. According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 71h Edition, the 18,500 square feet of distribution and related storage space is estimated to generate 15.17 P.M. peak hour tip ends (Land Use 30). The 7,500 square feet of office space is estimated to generate 11.18 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Thus, the total project is estimated to generate 26.25 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The subject property does not contain any identified wildlife habitat. However, the site does contain a pond and some wetlands. The wetlands are delineated on the plan dated October 16, 2004. The Natural Resources Committee (NRC) reviewed the proposed project at its meeting on November 4, 2004. The NRC recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. the applicant shall plant a vegetative delineation along the wetland buffer on the easterly side of the subject property; 2. the applicant shall mitigate the wetland impacts by adding 700 sq. ft. of constructed wetland to the existing Class III wetland on the easterly side of the subject property, 3. there shall be no development within any of the wetlands or wetland buffers, except for the proposed encroachment into the Class II I wetland buffer adjacent to the northerly property boundary; 4. there shall be no mowing or planting within the wetlands or wetland buffers; 5. there shall be no pesticide or herbicide application within the wetland or wetland buffers; 6. the detention pond shall be designed to maximize pollutant removal, 7. the applicant shall set-up annual water quality testing including a base -line test, to ensure that pollutants are not accumulating in any of the wetlands; 8. the applicant shall implement a mechanism to contain fuel spills; 9. the applicant shall submit confirmation from the wetland expert as to whether the wetlands on the easterly side of the property are indeed Class III and whether any wetlands or wetland buffers on the property to the south extend onto the subject property. -3- The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. According to Section 6.04(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Industrial -Open Space l0 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and Burlington International Airport. The /0 District regulations and standards are intended to allow high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open character of the district, minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and enhance the visual quality of approaches to the City while providing'` suitable locations for employment and business growth. The location and architectural design of buildings in a manner that preserves these qualities is strongly encouraged. The proposed project is in compliance with the stated purpose of the IO District, as outlined in the Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. There are significant portions of open space running along the western and eastern portions of the property, so staff feels this requirement is met. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated 9/29/04. Roads, and lig, such s otion paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of rs and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the westerly side of the proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian and recreation traffic through the property. This pedestrian easement is being relocated to the south within the planned unit development. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The subdivision plans for the entire Meadowland Business Park show details on utilities, lighting, and stormwater management. These have been approved by the City Engineer, so they are acceptable for the proposed project. A lighting point by point plan for the proposed project is contained on sheet SP-5 of the plans, which meets the requirements in Appendices A.9 and A.10 of the Land Development Regulations. In addition, the applicant submitted exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the M proposed lighting. The proposed lighting fixtures are in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). The proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The applicant's building elevation plans are on sheet A-1 of the plans. The proposed building accomplishes a desirable transition from structure to site and from structure to structure. The site includes a 20' wide pedestrian easement that will help facilitate pedestrian movement. In addition, there is an existing recreation path running along Meadowland Drive. Therefore, no additional sidewalks are necessary on the property. According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the 18,500 square feet of building dedicated to warehousing, processing storage, and distribution requires 9.25 parking spaces. The 7.500 square feet of building dedicated to office use will require 26.25 parking spaces. Thus, the proposed project will require a total of 36 parking spaces (rounded up from 35.5). The plans show a total of 67 parking spaces in the main parking lot, adjacent to Meadowland Drive. According to Table 13-7 of the Land Development Regulations, a property with 51 to 75 parking spaces requires three (3) handicapped -accessible parking spaces. The plans only depict two (2) handicapped - accessible spaces. In addition to the 67 standard parking spaces, the plans also depict 28 parking spaces for trucks on the rear portion of the property. The dimensions of the proposed parking areas meet the requirements in Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is proposed in the parking lot to the west of the proposed building. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The majority of the proposed parking is located in the front of the building. -5- Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The scale of the proposed building is compatible with the site and existing buildings in the area. The height of the proposed building is 27.5', which is in compliance with the Land development Regulations. The proposed project is located in a business park in a area where industrial uses exists, so staff feels the scale of the proposed building is compatible with existing buildings in the area. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. This requirement is being met. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. This requirement is being met. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Requlations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The proposed project is nestled between the wetlands on the site. In order to provide any access to adjacent properties; wetland encroachments would be necessary. Because the project is in a large lot, industrial area, the Board does not feel access to adjacent properties is necessary. However, if the property to the south is going to be developed with residential units, as second means of access, most likely through this property, will be required. This would require an access easement connecting the property to the south with Meadowland Drive. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. -6- Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans show a solid waste facility on the easterly side of the proposed building, which is adequately screened. Landscaping and Screening Requirements According to Table 13-9 of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed project has a minimum landscaping requirement of $14,500. The applicant is proposing $23,170 worth of landscaping, which includes eighteen (18) Austrian Pines on the property to the south. The landscape plan and landscape budget are in compliance with Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area with twenty (20) of more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. At least one (1) major deciduous shade tree, whose caliper is equal to or greater than two and one-half (2.5) inches when measures six (6) inches above ground at the time of planting, shall be provided within each parking area for every three thousand (3,000) square feet of paved area or every ten (10) parking spaces, whichever is greater. The landscaping plan for the off- street parking area is in compliance with Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans depict a snow storage area along the southern boundary of the property. Pursuant to Section 13.06(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any utility cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board. The applicant is proposing a screened HVAC pad to the east of the proposed building. The City Arborist reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated 10/4/04. -7- View Protection Zone The applicant shall submit information on the height of the proposed building in relation to mean sea level, prior to final plat approval. Other The City Engineer reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated September 9, 2004. DECISION Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Development Review Board hereby approves preliminary plat application #SD-04-61 and final plat application #SD- 04-62 of Spencer Terminal Holdings, subject to the following conditions: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations shall remain in full effect, except as amended herein. 2) This project shall be completed as shown on the plans submitted by the applicant, as amended by this decision, and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning. 3) The plat plans shall be revised to show the following changes and shall require approval from the Administrative Officer. Four (4) copies of the approved revised plat plans shall be submitted to the Administrative Officer prior to recording: a) The plans should be revised to depict a total of three (3) handicapped parking spaces. b) Sheet SP-1 of the plans shall be revised to correct the owner and co -applicant address information for Summer Ice Joint Venture. These addresses are labeled as Summit Street in South Burlington, which doesn't exist. c) SheetSP-1 of the plans shall be revised so that the parking calculation information corresponds with the Land Development Regulations. d) The plat plans shall be revised to show a vegetative delineation along the wetland buffer on the easterly side of the subject property. e) The plat plans shall be revised to mitigate the wetland impacts by adding 700 sq. ft. of constructed wetland to the existing Class III wetland on the easterly side of the subject property. f) The plat plans shall be revised to incorporate the recommendation of the city Arborist in his memo of 10/4/04. g) The plans shall be revised to add 10 to 12 foot high berms with evergreen trees on top with a minimum height of four (4) feet, at the southwest corner of the property, westerly of detention pond "A". h) The plans shall be revised to align the easterly access drive opposite Bowdoin Street and add curbs along the east side of the access drive. 4) The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Engineer, as outlined in his memorandum dated September 9, 2004. 5) The applicant shall comply with the requests of the Fire Chief, as outlined in his memorandum dated 9/29/04. 6) There shall be no development within any of the wetlands or wetland buffers, except for the proposed encroachment to the existing Class I II wetland on the easterly side of the subject property. 7) There shall be no mowing or planting within the wetlands or wetland buffers. 8) There shall be no pesticide or herbicide application within the wetland or wetland buffers. 9) The detention pond shall be designed to maximize pollutantremoval as required by the Vermont Stormwater Regulations. Certification from a licensed engineer that it meets the state requirements shall be submitted prior to permit issuance. 10) The applicant shall set up annual water quality testing, including a base -line test, to ensure that pollutants are not accumulating in any of the wetlands. The results of these annual tents shall be submitted to the Administrative Officer as soon as the results are available. 11) The use of "Jake Brakes" by any vehicle going to or from the subject property on Meadowland Drive is prohibited. 12) There shall be no idling of trucks for periods in excess of five (5) minutes on the subject property. 13) There shall be no use of a "back-up beeper" on any vehicle on the subject property between the hours of 10:00 pm and 7:00 am. 14) There shall be no refrigerated trucks used or stored on the subject property. 15) Prior to any change in tenant or additional tenant on the subject property, approval for an amended planned unit development shall be obtained from the Development Review Board. 16) The proposed use shall be limited to the following hours of operation 17) Weekday truck traffic, between the hours of 11:00 P.M. and 6:00 A. M., shall be limited to a maximum number of 6 vehicle trip ends. 18) Saturday operation of the use on the property shall be limited to 6:00 A.M. to 12:00 noon. 19) The use shall not operate from 12:00 noon Saturday until &00 A.M. Monday. 20) Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit a plan to the Administrative Officer to reduce light intensity at night by the use of dimmers, timers, and/or motion sensors. 21) The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. 22) The applicant shall record in the land records legal documents related to the new location of the pedestrian easement, approved by the City Attorney, prior to permit issuance. 23) Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. 24) The applicant shall demonstrate to the Administrative, Officer compliance with the view protection zone limitations for the proposed building, prior to permit issuance. 25) The applicant shall post a $14,500 landscape bond, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. This bond shall remain in effect for three(3) years to assure that the landscaping has taken root and has a goad chance of surviving. 26) For the purposes of calculating traffic impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the project will generate 26.25 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 27) All new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Administrative Officer prior to the installation. 28) Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval of the South Burlington Development Review Board. 29) The final plat plans (PUD plat and sheet SP-1) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. John Dinklage Roger Farley Michele Kupersmith -10- Larry Kupferman Gayle Quimby Signed the day of December, 2004. Please note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRCP 76 in writing, within 30 days of the date this decision is issued. The fee is $225.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long. You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy; finality). - 11 - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 JANUARY 2005 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 18 January 2005, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, iChair; L. Kupferman, M. Kupersmith, G. Quimby, R. Farley Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; B. Robertson, Associate Planner; D. Bruce, D. Burke, M.Feitelberg, M.Gravelin, F. Peet, V. Solai, A. Portz, P. Dimmer, W. Elliott, J. Fay, L. Llewellyn, D. Henson, S. Baker, Mr. & Mrs. Diemer L' Other Business: Mr. Belair presented a request from Spencer Terminal Holdings to reopen the hearing on the application approved a few weeks ago. They have issues with Condition #15. In addition, the property to the south, where the 200 foot buffer was moved to, had been owned by Marie Dubois. During the review process, that property was sold to John Larkin. The Board cannot impose a condition on his property when he was not a party to the process. Mr. Belair suggested a date of 15 February for the reopening of the hearing. At that time, ( the Board can make or not make any changes. Also, Mr. Larkin would have to agree to be part of the application so a condition could be put on his property. If he will not agree, the Board would have to deny the application. Mr. Dinklage noted the original approval was not a unanimous decision. Members generally favored re -opening the hearing. Ms. Quimby moved to reconsider the Findings of Fact and Decision of the Development Review Board dated 22 December 2004, rendered in the Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-61 and Final Plat Application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings, 596 Meadowland Drive, in order that the Development Review Board may determine if it had jurisdiction to consider, as part of that application, property now owned by John Larkin, Inc., and to hear the applicant's request to have the Board reconsider Stipulation #15 of the approval motion. Ms. Kupersmith seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 2. Minutes of 21 December 2004: Mr. Kupferman moved to approve the Minutes of 21 December 2004 as written. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 4-0 with Ms. Quimby abstaining. - 1 - r CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGri ON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 23, 2004 Ian Jewkes Krebs & Lansing 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings Dear Mr. Chase: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on December 21, 2004 (effective 12/22/04). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 90 days (must be submitted by 3/15/05) of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy Mc-Donough, Administrative Assistant Encl. l CITY OF SOUTH BT.JRLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 8, 2004 Ian Jewkes Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Re: Minutes Dear Mr. Jewkes: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the November 9, 2004 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. sowcer DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 9 NOVEMBER 2004 3. Consent Agenda: a. Design Review Application #DR-04-08 of South Burlington Realty Company for design review approval for the following exterior modifications: 1) fill-in overhead door areas on south and east sides to match existing metal siding, and 2) resurface roof with a membrane roof system, 40 San Remo Drive: No issues were raised. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Design Review Application 4DR-04-09 subject to the stipulations in the staff recommendations. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. b) Design Review Application 4DR-04-10 of Dorset Communications, LLC, for a new Master Signage Permit, so that future tenants are able to receive sign permits, and for approval of a sign in gold, red, black and white, 372 Dorset Street: Mr. Boucher moved to approve Design Review Application 4DR-04-10 subject to the Stipulations in the staff recommendations. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-61 and Final Plat Application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) constructing a 26,000 sq. ft. distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south located at the end of Dubois Drive: Mr. Boucher stepped down during this hearing due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Dinklage stressed that the 2 properties will be tied together as one PUD. Mr. Jewkes indicated they have delineated the wetland on the plan. The Natural Resources Committee has made some recommendations, and the applicant has no problem complying with them. Mr. Dinklage asked where they will add to additional wetland space. Mr. Jewkes showed an area outside of all the buffers. Mr. Jewkes noted there were also noise concerns raised by neighbors. Mr. Dinklage noted this is a specifically identified allowable use in this district. Mr. Dinklage asked if there is a connector to the east on the Official City Map. Mr. Belair replied that there used to be. It stops at Muddy Brook. -1)- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 9 NOVEMBER 2004 With regard to the noise issue, Mr. Dinklage suggested not allowing "jake brakes" on the downgrade. Mr. Spencer said that is do -able as most trucks don't have them. Mr. Dinklage also asked about a 5 minute time limit for idling. Mr. Spencer said that's standard procedure, and their trucks are programmed to shut down in 5 minutes. He also noted they have only one truck with a "back-up" beeper which could be removed. He agreed that they would not use this between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Mr. Belair noted receipt of a call from a City Council member about limiting the hours of operation to 7 a.m.-7 p.m. Mr. Dinklage raised the question of some forest land that is dying due to standing water. - Mr. Jewkes said it seems like pretty good cover at the moment. Ms. Main said there are a lot of dead trees in there now, mostly evergreens. Mr. Jewkes then showed additional trees that will be planted along the border with the Munson property and landscaping to keep people out of the buffer zone. Mr. Dinklage noted that residents are asking for berms, and he suggested a berm to the south. Mr. Jewkes agreed to this. Mr. Plumeau asked about hours of lighting at the facility and asked that they be turned off between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. He cited an increase in light pollution. Mr. Plumeau also noted that his reading of the regulations indicates that this area is not supposed to accommodate this kind of use. He noted that this is the kind of use that could attract similar uses, and he questioned whether this is what the city wants bordering the Southeast Quadrant. He added that residents are very concerned about their quality of life. Mr. Dinklage said this development has less impact than what could be there. Mr. Plumeau responded that this is a very different type of use than anything else in the area. He also felt it will be many years before there is a Hinesburg Rd. interchange. Ms. Lee said she didn't see any trees on the south and west of where trucks will be parked, and many houses look down into that area. She also noted that there is now a beeper that goes all day long from the quarry, and lights from the existing building shine directly into her bedroom all night long. Mr. Belair said he would look into that.. Ms. Quimby asked if the business operates on weekends. Mr. Spencer said they are pretty well closed from about 10 a.m. Saturday to Monday morning, although there may be an odd truck that comes in. Mr. Dinklage showed an area for a possible berm. Mr. Jewkes felt that was possible. Ms. Quimby asked if they have any refrigeration trucks and noted that one behind her property runs all day and all night. Mr. Spencer said they do not have any refrigeration trucks. Mr. Bolton noted that if this property were sold in the future, the buyer could -3- t DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 9 NOVEMBER 2004 have refrigeration trucks. He suggested a stipulation that would prohibit refrigeration trucks. Mr. Behr asked if it's possible to have less light at night. Mr. Spencer said they are a 24- hour operation. Mr. Belair noted the applicant is within the allowable light for the property. He also noted that from a safety point of view, police like to see more lighting. Mr. Dinklage suggested turning off the 2 big pole lights after 9 p.m. Mr. Perkins asked how the applicant defines "sparse activity" at night. Mr. Spencer said about 3 trucks a night a few days a week; other days, nothing. Mr. Plumeau raised the question of mixing truck traffic into Hinesburg Rd. traffic. Trucks have very different characteristics. There are also school buses driving those peak hours. He felt that hasn't been adequately addressed. He felt the figures being used a number of years old and that since then things have changes. The Comprehensive Plan says there should be no "truck -intensive" uses there as they are inappropriate for that area. Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant if there are hours they don't have to operate. Mr. Spencer said they have to operate 24 hours a day. Mr. Dinklage cited the Hannaford situation where Hannafords was required to put up sound fences and limit their hours of operation. He felt this issue can be revisited if the applicant is not living within the noise ordinance. Ms. Main cited the concern with being awakened on summer nights when windows are open. She felt this use will affect the quality of life of residents. Mr. Plumeau noted there is a forecast of a great increase in truck traffic in coming years. He felt there is no way truck traffic in and out of this facility won't increase. Ms. Kupersmith noted that one criteria for PUD approval is conformity with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, and that question has been raised with regard to this plan. Mr. Dinklage felt it might be prudent to have a discussion with the City Attorney on that issue. A resident noted that Hinesburg Rd/Kennedy Drive is not "truck friendly" and felt there will be a backup of cars and trucks in the a.m. peak hour. Mr. Chase, owner of the adjacent development, CBA, said he is comfortable with the amount of traffic his business and the applicant's will generate. Regarding noise, he said the prevailing wind is from the south, and there will be more noise from aircraft than from Spencer's business. Mr. Chase also said he didn't realize there was a problem with any of their lights, and he would look into this. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 9 NOVEMBER 2004 Mr. Perkins said he personally saw the destruction of a Massachusetts town when a business like this came in. He said it started small like this one and then took over the whole area. He asked if this is what people really want South Burlington to be. Mr. Bolton asked if this is a "squeaky clean" applicant. Mr Belair said it meets the regs dimensionally, with setbacks, coverage, etc. No waivers are being sought. He was not sure about such subjective things as compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Belair also noted that in the set of plans received today, the access drive is no longer directly opposite Bowdoin Drive. Mr. Jewkes explained this is related to a request from the Natural Resources Committee because of wetlands concern. He suggested that if they put a curb on the road to keep water out of the wetland, they could align the accesses. Board members preferred to have the accesses aligned. Ms. Quimby asked if there would be traffic other than the applicant's trucks. Mr. Spencer said rarely there is a customer pick-up, but mostly it is their trucks and employees vehicles. Ms. Quimby then moved to close the public hearing. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site Plan Application #SP-04-37 of CCTA for reconstruction and relocation of a bus shelter, 550 Dorset Street: Mr. Belair said he had no issues. Mr. Peterson said this shelter replaces one previously proposed to accommodate the wishes of the school. He asked to waive the appeal time. Mr. Belair said this can't be done as he can't issue a permit until the appeal time is expired. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plat Application #SP-04-37 of CCTA subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Site Plan Application 4SP-04-42 of CCTA for reconstruction of a bus shelter, 1185 Shelburne Road: No issues were raised. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-04-42 of CCTA subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Site Plan Application #SP-04-43 of Champlain Water District to amend a previously approved site plan for a water treatment plant, chemical storage facility, maintenance garage, and other accessory facilities. The amendment consists of constructing a 343 sq. ft. office addition, 403 Queen City Park Road: -5- Landscape Review 10/04/04 Corporate Headquarters Land Air Krebs and Lansing Engineers Species Selection Both Red Maple and Ash are over planted species in the city of South Burlington. Substitute species should be used. Some possibilities include: l . Kentucky Coffeetree, Gymnocladus dioicus 2. Amur Corktree, Phellodendron amurense 3. American Elm `Princeton' or `Valley Forge', Ulmus Americana Princeton' or `Valley Forge' 4. Prospector Elm, Ulmus wilsoniana `Prospector' 5. Ginkgo, Ginkgo biloba 6. Honeylocust, Gleditsia triacanthos Japanese flowering crabapples located by the front entrance will outgrow this location quickly and will require extensive pruning to maintain clearance over the sidewalk Planting Details Planting details and specifications should be included with plans Sout� September 29, 2004 Burlington Fire Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4110 Douglas S. Brent, Fire Chief Ms. Juli Beth Hinds, Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Spencer Terminal Dear Juli: I have reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of the Spencer Terminal on Meadowland Drive. I have also made a site visit to view where this building will be sited. The preliminary plans seem to be OK and I have the following recommendations: 1. Compliance with all requirements of Vermont Labor and Industry Fire Prevention Division codes and standards. 2. Automatic sprinklers and alarm system as required by Vermont Labor and Industry Fire Prevention Division, building and garage. 3. Fire Department Sprinkler Connection per code, location to be specified by SBFD. 4. Fire Alarm panel and annunciator panel location to be specified by SBFD. 5. Provide an emergency key box, location to be specified by SBFD. 6. 1 recommend that two new fire hydrants be installed, one on each side of the building located about half way down. At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves forward additional items may surface which could be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the developer and Labor and Industry. Page - 2 Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact me. cerely, Douglas S. Brent Fire Chief BILL SZYMANSKI, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 846-4io6 (phone) 846-4101 (fax) COMMENTS Spencer Terminal Swift Street Extension 9/9/04 1. Curb cuts at drives shall have depressed concrete curbs. 2. The easterly drive should have the same return radii as the westerly especially when the street is extended into Williston and there will be turns in that direction. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 NOVEMBER 2003 has the authority to limit accesses. There is also a driveway shown for Lot #3 very close to the one being proposed for lot #1. He suggested a shared access for lot #3. Members agreed and stipulation "n" was added as follows: Plans shall be revised to show a shared access drive with Lot #3. Mr. Kupferman noted that the Fire Chief has in the past been concerned about access to the rear of buildings. This may create a problem. He also asked about stormwater. Mr. Llewellyn showed the location of underground storage and holding pond. Mr. Steinzor cited the danger of approaching this area incrementally, especially where the area is in flux. He stressed that the existing traffic problems won't be solved by dumping more traffic onto the streets. He suggested putting off a decision until there is a better context to work in. Mr. Boucher noted there will be big issues to solve at Final Plat. Mr. Boucher moved approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-03-56 subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Messrs. Bolton and Kupferman abstaining. 6. Continued Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-03-02 of JAM Golf, LLC to amend a planned unit development consisting of 264 residential units and an 18-hole golf course. The amendment consists of approval for "as built" berms located on the east side of Dorset St. beginning at the Old Cross Road intersection extending north through the Holbrook Road intersection: Mr. Farley moved to continue this application until 6 January 2004. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Sketch Plan Application #SD-03-71 of Land Air Express for a planned unit development consisting of a 24,540 sq. ft. distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the same tenant, 596 Meadowland Drive: Mr. Boucher stepped down due to a conflict of interest as an adjacent property owner. Mr. Willard noted the property is in Meadowlands Park and will be a corporate headquarters. 6840 sq. ft. will be office and the rest will be distribution and service. Mr. Willard said they will address concerns in staff notes. Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to meet with the Rec Path Committee. Mr. Willard showed 8 acres of wetlands that will remain untouched. Mr. Dinklage asked about the hours of operation. Mr. Willard said the facility would operate 24 M DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 NOVEMBER 2003 hours a day. Mr. Belair noted there are performance standards that limit noise that can be heard from a property. Mr. Willard said they will screen the property with trees. He also noted that the site is in a very low area. No other issues were raised. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 11:00 p.m. Clerl UC-06-0 Date -7- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 SEPTEMBER 2004 10. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-61 and Final Plat Application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) construction of a 26,000 sq. ft. distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no - construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south located at the end of Dubois Drive: Mr. Boucher stepped down due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Belair noted the applicant would be expanding the PUD to allow for the moving of the "don't build" zone. Mr. Jewkes said they would use municipal water and sewer. They will have a new stormwater system which meets the new standards. Mr. Plummeau said this is the first neighbors have heard of this. He asked about hours of operation, noise, turning movements, etc. He said the building design suggests a pretty active facility and they are concerned with noise and lighting. Mr. Jewkes said there is landscaping to buffer noise. There is over 200 ft. to the nearest home. Mr. Plummeau said I-189 is further away and noise is very clear. Landscaping won't work as a buffer to noise. Mr. Bolton said he wouldn't want trucks left idling out there with diesel emissions. The applicant said their trucks are timed for 5-minute shutdowns. They have no refrigeration units. They also do have plug -ins. Mr Bolton recommended a stipulation to insure there are adequate plug-in facilities. The applicant, LTL Distribution, said their trucks are loaded in the evening and go out in the morning. They deal in general commodities, not hazardous materials. They are like UPS or FedX, but the shipment sizes are a bit larger. Local deliveries are done in smaller trucks. Mr. Jewkes said they estimate 32 peak hour trip ends. Mr Belair said this is within traffic limits. Mr. Dinklage noted that staff recommends the application be continued in order to have the applicant address noise buffering. Mr. Jewkes noted that Munson is asking for more landscaping as a buffer (Austrian pines every 20 feet). They have no objection to doing that. Mr. Dinklage reminded the applicant that they must meet the city's noise standards. M DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 SEPTEMBER 2004 Mr. Belair said they applicant must provide a plan showing what the whole PUD will look like. Mr. Neaghly said he had met with the Rec Path Committee and they will take the path out of the wetland and bring it around. Mr. Kupferman then moved to continue preliminary plat application #SD-04-61 and Final Plat Application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings until 19 October. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P.M. Clerk Date -7- I October 8, 2004 RE: Proposed Spencer Holdings, Inc. (Land Air Express) Terminal Facility, Lot #3, Meadowland Business Park Dear City of South Burlington Development Review Board Members: We are each residents of either the Ledge Knoll neighborhood or the Oak Creek neighborhood in South Burlington. We have several concerns regarding Spencer Holdings, Inc.'s (Land Air Express) proposed building on Lot #3 in the Meadowland Business Park off Hinesburg Road. Some of us attended the September 21, 2004 Development Review Board meeting and we thank you for welcoming us in the discussion held that night regarding the proposed building. Others of us would have liked to attend the meeting, but not all residents of our neighborhoods were directly notified of the meeting. For those of us in attendance, some of our questions regarding the proposed development were answered during the meeting and in a post meeting conversation that we had with Bill Spencer. Some of us have even visited and toured Land Air Express's current facility. Those residents in attendance at the meeting have shared information gathered regarding the nature of the proposed building with other neighbors, who also voiced their concern. Collectively, we are concerned with the nature of the business being proposed and the ramifications of such a development so close in proximity to our homes. The Spencer Holdings, Inc. proposal is inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan (2001) for the Southeast Quadrant (SEQ). The stated goal for the SEQ is "to promote a pattern of land use and development that respects and maintains the open and special character of the [SEQ]." The Plan allows for industrial development in the northeast corner of the SEQ that consists of "high quality, large -lot, environmentally consistent industries or offices within well -designed planned developments that preserve large tracts of usable, visible, open space." The plan recognizes that industrial and office use in the SEQ must "maintain the scenic views and open space and have little adverse traffic impact" to be "consistent and compatible with the development in the rest of the SEQ." Moreover, the plan recommends that commercial/industrial uses in the SEQ be limited to "clean, high quality light manufacturing, research and testing, and office use" (pp. 47-54). In light of these statements, the proposed facility is clearly incompatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan because it falls outside the scope of recommended commercial/industrial uses for the SEQ and, as discussed below, is likely to adversely impact traffic and tarnish scenic views. Further, we also note that Land Air Express's business (general parcel carrier) is much more warehousing and transportation -based in nature than a standard office building. We believe it will have a very different effect on its residential neighbors than that of the existing CBA office building in the same Business Park. We, therefore, do not believe that the proposed Land Air Express distribution facility is an appropriate project for this site. In addition, as outlined in more detail below, we oppose the Spencer Holdings, Inc. building proposal due to the noise, air and environmental pollution, negative health effects, ambient night light, tarnished view and increased traffic that such a facility would bring. NOISE Concern • Trucks entering Meadowland Business Park and subject lot at early hours in the morning or late evening hours. • Use of truck engine brakes ("jake brakes") on downgrade from Hinesburg Road to facility. • Truck movement and idling on facility lot. • Loading and unloading trucks at the site. Noise of forklifts and other equipment used to move units within facility and onto trucks. Some equipment is mandated by OSHA to use beepers when operating in reverse. Noise of wooden pallets being dropped onto trucks. • Warehouse telephone and loudspeakers. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION Concern • Diesel emissions, fumes and odors. • Siting of/nature of underground or above ground fuel tanks on the property and precautions against spillage and leakage. NEGATIVE HEALTH EFFECTS Concern • Diesel exhaust contains significant levels of small particles, known as fine particulate matter, that are a serious public health concern. • According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, diesel particulate matter is likely to cause cancer in humans and other acute and chronic health effects. • Diesel engine exhaust exacerbates existing allergies and asthma symptoms. • Children are most at risk because they breathe 50 percent more air per pound of body weight than adults. COMMUNITY COMPATABILITY Concern • Proposed facility does not appear to be in compliance with the City's stated plans and goals for the SEQ, per the 2001 Comprehensive Plan. • It is widely accepted in the transportation planning community that distribution and logistics centers like the proposed facility tend to attract additional similar facilities because of the logistical and cost -efficiencies associated with shared access to arterials, customers and inexpensive and available land. • A new Hinesburg Road exit from I-89 is part of the City's comprehensive plan; however, it is widely accepted that it will be many years before funding and related resources may be available to construct this exit, resulting in trucks traveling between I-89 and Meadowland Business Park needing to use arterials and city streets intended in many cases for non -heavy truck uses. AIMBIENT NIGHT LIGHT Concern • Light pollution of the night sky. 2 TARNISHED VIEW Concern • Building within site of houses. • Existing forest on west side of lot is dying due to standing water (unknown whether due to natural causes or man-made impacts). • Storage of materials, containers, trailers, etc. on -site. • Impact on view of changed site elevation due to fill being used to raise ground level for building construction. • Maintenance of facility and yard. • Fine particles from diesel engines contribute to haze which restricts our ability to see long distances. INCREASED TRAFFIC Concern • Trucks entering and exiting Meadowland Drive from/to Hinesburg Road. • Turning movements of trucks to/from Hinesburg Road. • Increased truck traffic on Hinesburg Road, Kennedy Drive and other city roadways leading to I-89 access points. Although we oppose the proposed facility, in the event that the Board should choose to approve the proposed Spencer Holdings, Inc. building, we would urge you to make the approval subject to all the conditions noted below to lessen the negative impact we feel the building will have on both the quality of life of the nearby residents and the value of the properties in the Ledge Knoll and Oak Creek residential developments. Considerations/Recommendations for NOISE • No use of truck engine brakes on access road or on the site. • Hours of operation restricted to 6 am to 10 pm. • No idling on the site. Engines turned off immediately upon arrival on site. • Facility to only accommodate inside loading bays (i.e., bays where the truck is completely inside the building before loading/unloading begins). • Regular, random testing that noise level is within city guidelines. • Large (at least 12 feet high) earthen berms on the west and south sides of the lot. • Independent professional study of proposed facility's noise impacts on Ledge Knoll neighborhood, with identification and reporting of noise contours and compliance with South Burlington noise ordinances. Considerations/Recommendations for ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION • Requirement for electrical plug-in facilities with adequate capacity to accommodate highest number of trucks anticipated to be parked on -site. • No idling on the site. • Exhaust testing on trucks. • Demonstration that fuel storage on site for trucks, forklifts or other machinery is compliant with all state and federal regulations. 3 Considerations/Recommendations for COMMUNITY COMPATABILITY • Ensure the DRB, Planning Commission and City Council fully understand the potential future implications of siting this type of facility in the Southeast Quadrant and whether such development meets the goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan. • Independent professional study of impact of increased truck traffic (large and small trucks) on routes between Meadowland Drive and I-89 access points to understand impacts of intersections, safety, congestion and noise. Considerations/Recommendations for AIMBIENT NIGHT LIGHT • Minimum lighting of the lot. • Lights turned off from 10 pm to 6 am. • Compliance with South Burlington exterior lighting rules and the pending revised edition of the Vermont Outdoor Lighting Manual for Vermont Municipalities. Considerations/Recommendations for TARNISHED VIEW • Large (at least 12 feet high) earthen berms on the west and south sides of the lot. • Dense planting of evergreen trees on top of the berms. • Minimum requirements for upkeep of building exterior (both structure and plantings). Considerations/Recommendations for INCREASED TRAFFIC • Independent professional study of Hinesburg Road/Meadowland Drive intersection regarding turning movements, geometry, signal warrants and pedestrian/bicyclist use/safety and a requirement that any needed improvements be implemented prior to Spencer Terminal operations. • Independent professional study of impact of increased truck traffic (large and small trucks) on routes between Meadowland Drive and I-89 access points to understand impacts of intersections, safety, congestion and noise. In conclusion, we strongly oppose the Spencer Holdings, Inc. building proposal for the reasons discussed above. Notwithstanding, should the Board approve this building request, we are confident that you will condition the permit with appropriate requirements such that all neighbors can continue their same quality of life - with good views, peaceful dark nights, quiet days, clean air, and safe travels to and from home. In addition, it is important to us that we protect the value of our real estate investments. We want to thank the City of South Burlington Development Review Board members for their careful and thoughtful consideration of the concerns that we have expressed herein. 4 Sincerely, eter umeau 33 Knoll Circle C \k P H Cheryl H chens 36 Knoll Ckek r D e Main 3, ,Knoll Circle laine 'Gra 31 Dubois Drive Shari Levine 21 Dubois Drive e nifer Wrch 16 Dubois Drive Wayne P�O/ ay "___/ / 4 37 Kn Circle c� Leslie Black-Plumeau 33 Knoll Circle Paul Houchens 36 Knoll Circle Heather Main 3,/Knoll Circle Steve Grant 21 ]Dubois Drive in Borch Dubois Drive Shirley Gray 37 Knoll Circle 5 C R y Ki g 10 Oak reek �S Kn;,ii Gf�le I� �•I C, � e c c Atu�,tzti, �,e C4r(le ()r4 '1(6kllu 30 �1kn c) l C, FIE Wendy King 10 Oak Creek ,h-ut� ShYky E. Hwy `3 v n,-11 c c%e. S b-j hL..S �r J '4 1 Gr• VT Us qo3 30 s, Lee— C I a dctr 1p`�,jC� S . /�� ✓ T C? S-SSG' 3 S /� . l/ T lJ S% U� '�G �- v S �' • �� as��J PTTE40 SHF-de,�L / 9 0/V C2,F,42 . e , f �rnand o Carta a 1 7 Oak C gee lk ,br, r �'n�ton , v T dS-403 ,f„ Pa m-eA 0 `T0 r� ` �re.e�K oa �K r '1 -Iz.►-1 cJT` v > -7t/A 5 M��4,qz /,� PA? ,�D y ?u `A161-vA1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: November 5, 2004 1drb\.suNand_air express\preli mina ry_finaI Application received: August 12 2004 LAND AIR EXPRESS PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD-04-61 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-04-64 Agenda #5 Meeting Date- November 9, 2004 Applicant Owner Land Air Express of New England, Ltd. Summer Ice Joint Venture 115 Covington Lane 82 Church Street Shelburne, VT 05482 Burlington, VT 05401 Engineer Property Information Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. Tax Parcel 1155-00596-C 164 Main Street 10 District and Hinesburg Road -North Scenic Colchester, VT 05446 View Protection overlay District 20.2 Acres 11 Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final Spencer Terminal Holdings, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking preliminary and final plat approval for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) construction of a 26,000 sq ft distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no -construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south located at the end of Dubois Drive. The Development Review Board held a public hearing on the proposed project on September 21, 2004 (minutes enclosed), but it was continued to provide the applicant with sufficient time to provide additional information. The proposed use is a conditional use in the 10 District and the Hinesburg Road -North Scenic View Protection Overlay District. However, in accordance with Section 15.03(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the application is being reviewed as a PUD, so conditional uses do not need separate conditional use approval. Staff would like to make a few comments regarding the letter that the Development Review Board received from a collaboration of concerned neighbors, dated October 8, 2004. Much of that letter was geared towards explaining how the proposed use was inconsistent with the goals and character of the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. While many of those points were valid for the Southeast Quadrant, the proposed project is located within the Industrial & Open Space Zoning District. Staff would also like to point out that the City does have performance standards to control noise, air pollution, and lighting in Appendix A of the Land Development Regulations. The applicant will have to comply with all applicable performance standards throughout the project. Associate Planner Brian Robertson, referred to herein as Staff, has reviewed the plans submitted on September 18, 2003 and has the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements 10 Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 3 acres 20.2 acres �l Max. Density n/a n/a Max. Building Coverage 25% 2.7% �l Max. Overall Coverage 40% 19.8% Min. Front Setback 50 ft. 50 ft. Min. Side Setback 35 ft. 280 ft. Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. 200 ft. Max. Building Height 35 ft. 24 ft. zoning compliance n/a no residential units proposed CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\nreliminary final SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. The entire Meadowland Business Park has an approved water allocation, which applies to this proposed project. In addition, the water infrastructure has already been installed, so it is only a matter of connecting this building to the system. The Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department is in the process of reviewing the plans. His comments should be available for the meeting. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The subdivision received a 30,345 gallon per day sewer allocation. This allocation is still in effect. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The proposed grading plan is outlined on sheet SP-3 of the plans and the erosion control details are outlined on sheet D-3 of the plans. 1. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to this property is proposed via two (2) access drives off of Meadowland Drive: a 26' wide drive on the westerly side of the proposed building and a 24' wide drive on the easterly side of the proposed building. Both of these access drives are proposed for ingress and egress. The two proposed access drives are at least 400' apart, which is compliance with Section 15.12(E) of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to Section 15.12(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the easterly access drive is aligned with Bowdoin Street, on the opposite side of Meadowland Drive. The proposed truck parking lots are very large to accommodate the large trucks this site will cater to. Therefore, circulation on the site should not be an issue. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 71h Edition, the 18,500 square feet of distribution and related storage space is estimated to generate 15.17 P.M. peak hour tip ends (Land Use 30). The 7,500 square feet of office space is estimated to generate 11.18 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Thus, the total project is estimated to generate 26.25 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The subject property does not contain any identified wildlife habitat. However, the site does contain a pond and some wetlands. The wetlands are delineated on the plan dated October 16, 2004. The Natural Resources Committee (NRC) reviewed the proposed project at its meeting on November 4, 2004. The NRC recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. the applicant shall plant a vegetative delineation along the wetland buffer on the easterly side of the subject property; 2. the applicant shall mitigate the wetland impacts by adding 700 sq. ft. of constructed wetland to the existing Class III wetland on the easterly side of the subject property; 3. there shall be no development within any of the wetlands or wetland buffers, except for the proposed encroachment into the Class III wetland buffer adjacent to the northerly property boundary; 4. there shall be no mowing or planting within the wetlands or wetland buffers; 5. there shall be no pesticide or herbicide application within the wetland or wetland buffers; 6. the detention pond shall be designed to maximize pollutant removal; 7. the applicant shall set-up annual water quality testing, including a base -line test, to ensure that pollutants are not accumulating in any of the wetlands; 8. the applicant shall implement a mechanism to contain fuel spills; 9. the applicant shall submit confirmation from the wetland expert as to whether the wetlands on the easterly side of the property are indeed Class III and whether any wetlands or wetland buffers on the property to the south extend onto the subject property. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. According to Section 6.04(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Industrial -Open Space 10 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and Buffington International Airport. The 10 District regulations and standards are intended to allow high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open character of the district, minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and enhance the visual quality of approaches to the City while providing suitable locations for employment and business growth. The location and architectural design of buildings in a manner that preserves these qualities is strongly encouraged. Staff feels the proposed project is in compliance with the stated purpose of the 10 District, as outlined in the Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\subUand air express\preliminary final There are significant portions of open space running along the western and eastern portions of the property, so staff feels this requirement is met. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The Fire Chief is in the process of reviewing the plans. His comments should be available for the meeting. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the westerly side of the proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian and recreation traffic through the property. This pedestrian easement is being relocated within the planned unit development. 2. The applicant shall submit legal documents related to the new location of this pedestrian easement, approved by the City Attorney, prior to recording of the final plat plans. 3. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The subdivision plans for the entire Meadowland Business Park show details on utilities, lighting, and stormwater management. These have been approved by the City Engineer, so they are acceptable for the proposed project. A lighting point by point plan for the proposed project is contained on sheet SP-5 of the plans, which meets the requirements in Appendices A.9 and A.10 of the Land Development Regulations. In addition, the applicant submitted exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the proposed lighting. The proposed lighting fixtures are in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sublland air express\preliminary final The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement and adequate parking areas. The applicant's building elevation plans are on sheet A-1 of the plans. Staff feels the proposed building accomplishes a desirable transition from structure to site and from structure to structure. The site includes a 20' wide pedestrian easement that will help facilitate pedestrian movement. In addition, there is an existing recreation path running along Meadowland Drive. Therefore, staff does not feel any additional sidewalks are necessary on the property. According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the 18,500 square feet of building dedicated to warehousing, processing storage, and distribution requires 9.25 parking spaces. The 7,500 square feet of building dedicated to office use will require 26.25 parking spaces. Thus, the proposed project will require a total of 36 parking spaces (rounded up from 35.5). The plans show a total of 67 parking spaces in the main parking lot, adjacent to Meadowland Drive. According to Table 13-7 of the Land Development Regulations, a property with 51 to 75 parking spaces requires three (3) handicapped -accessible parking spaces. The plans only depict two (2) handicapped -accessible spaces. In addition to the 67 standard parking spaces, the plans also depict 28 parking spaces for trucks on the rear portion of the property. 4. The plans should be revised to depict a total of three (3) handicapped parking spaces, prior final plat approval. The dimensions of the proposed parking areas meet the requirements in Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is proposed in the parking lot to the west of the proposed building. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The majority of the proposed parking is located in the front of the building. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The scale of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site and existing buildings in the area. The height of the proposed buildings is 27.5', which is in compliance with the Land development Regulations. The proposed project is located in a business park in a area where industrial uses exists, so staff feels the scale of the proposed building is compatible with existing buildings in the area. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. Staff feels this requirement is being met. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. Staff feels this requirement is being met In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The proposed project is nestled between the wetlands on the site. In order to provide any access to adjacent properties, wetland encroachments would be necessary. Because the project is in a large lot, industrial area, staff does not feel access to adjacent properties is necessary. However, if the property to the south is going to be developed with residential units, as second means of access, most likely through this property, will be required. This would require an access easement connecting the property to the south with Meadowland Drive. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enciosure(s). The plans show a solid waste facility on the easterly side of the proposed building, which is adequately screened. Landscaping and Screening Requirements According to Table 13-9 of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed project has a minimum landscaping requirement of $14,500. The applicant is proposing $23,170 worth of landscaping, which includes eighteen (18) Austrian Pines on the property to the south. The landscape plan and landscape budget are in compliance with Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area with twenty (20) of more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. At least one (1) major deciduous shade tree, whose caliper is equal to or greater than two and one-half (2.5) inches when measures six (6) inches above ground at the time of planting, shall be provided within each parking area for every three thousand (3,000) square feet of paved area or every ten (10) parking spaces, whichever is greater. The landscaping plan for the off- street parking area is in compliance with Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans depict a snow storage area along the southern boundary of the property. Pursuant to Section 13.06(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any utility cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board. The applicant is proposing a screened HVAC pad to the east of the proposed building. View Protection Zone 5. The applicant shall submit information on the height of the proposed building in relation to mean sea level, prior to final plat approval. Other The City Engineer reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated September 9, 2004 (attached). 6. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Engineer, as outlined in his memorandum dated September 9, 2004. 7. Sheet SP-1 of the plans shall be revised to correct the owner and co -applicant address information for Summer Ice Joint Venture, prior to recording of the final plat plans. These addresses are labeled as Summit Street in South Burlington, which doesn't exist. 8. Sheet SP-1 of the plans shall be revised so that the parking calculation information corresponds with the Land Development Regulations, prior to recording of the final plat plans. 9. The plat plan for the entire Meadowland Business Park PUD, and the plat plan for the Dubois property to the south, shall be submitted prior to recording of the final plat plans. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\subVand air express\preliminary final Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Preliminary Plat application #SD- 04-61 and Final Plat application #SD-04-64, conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document. Respectfull bmitted, i an Roberts p, Associate Planner Ll- Copy to: Bill Spencer, applicant C I I T awk, Lot r,.S & JaiLot 7,e w,rnro °°W597 <481 — — tst 10 Y6L 387 A4JV s 84SO _wMWdaffik — 1 \ --T--- aeretnaae swma.°tL,gra, Pored � V 11 i. Lot 3 A $ Summr Ice JbInt YNW& }( seal Vol. JB7 P. 439 osert Acrrul ite Areo=202 acres W 21i P. 168 Location Mao a— 1 0— /1 eetlmd Duner /nl6rmatkrt: / Lot 2 A PeaYe- Ea�"•"-s'r� '� I t Summer /ce ..bbrt Yentuie / _ •\ 153 Summit Street Nrism EodS IbN1y _ - I ''� South Bvr!/ngton, VT 05404 Ifrt B3Y P.1S7 /� / i� \ ,• _ ° 1 (802)-658-6320 ,i r :.as a/ angFrm zo' 1 Legend App//crlt /nfarmot/an: Co-App//cnnt /nformat/on: t>aeesunn E r — - i- — Spencer Terminal Holdings, 11. O, Homer h Morie Dubois I ties a— n .enure 9er04ct � v �' c% *Y/iom Spencer 1405 Hnesburg Rood e� P gowty Lbe a R/ght of Mty P.O. Box 50.1 Avenue C South SwH glon, VT 05403 MV/Jston, VT 05495 (802)-862-8687 (802)-863-5062 no me. Jae ,roh,t Y-t1n, Summit Street _ f south Burlington, VT 05404 J' 7, t5 lest 0 Waiver themwoc t 3 a / / I ZMp10.• 1B02I-65B-b'320 N aT23�6 E / Appticon ylg buffer / Lo3 - Meodowtdrd, lndusbid and 4— .�ooce ZmTng District 1 ked 200' eon Y _ Dubois Property Southeast 0v dront Zonb g DaMkt M 1 Pip s d 200 fe9u 0 Dubois XoPert • - - --� Zoning earl _ - --- ase+nen� Amos• ---°d- - -___ _ -- _ _ Lot 3 - Meodor/ond = 202 acres JV'--d I'iso'..wr eawnrrt i I . _ _ ------ Dubois property = 533 ocros Soett M m» g.. er I 1 , Total area = M5 ocros F%A IS 'A 8------------ RECEIVED Va. Of P282 Porch A a Hann dt Made Dubo/s Horner & Marl* ptbo/a yyla Vol. 179 P. 126 Acrar, km KaC 179 A128 1f � Areo=J28 acres NX 17J P.166 Areo=20.5 acres `Ig O C T 19 2004 Dom A Lop City of So. Burlington N I Va aces A40 � u I Wbrwy & Dim. I pblMgM to A Abe - 1 Notes.• tii1ztarto �Porze/ A beabo the i .ate arm w ev nr e: s cm,T: o s✓ 4(a! 278 P.193 1� C/ty of Savth Btu/hglm 1 endrbd 7NwbHbW md B✓airess Pant- SL+DWH im Her• by T dM/ ConwRbrq G9Yee.sx Honct 96022-40 dared 4/23/SW rerawd 8/27/96 ,ecrvded h j� W •386 P.98 of — aty of Savor &Mhgt_ Lord Rearde,and o P- 1G % PokrrvaeC C t q &g td V � Hid pyy S ..A g r,.977 k sro/1cr 83014, dohs 1t 6 Hbwh�I yt�y 5/B/B5, mcaNM oa Si'Je tll h pfY o/ Soum dxtvgton Land Remda. I W sea P,262 I 5 �71, gal I J / pv� H85 MM Yo1. L 454 P.P.QS 1 / y�E / 0• 50' 100' 100 ,XA�• I00' SW' ,krrn d• 5beat R.O t t Lltob s. Hood 3 I Ya! 12J P4J0 Va. 2P11 .42 Raph :�- Bar Scale t- =100' .M»atte oWo wfy'1 212 Pis ' sew S 7J707f7' E — � Dore re4xe aeerrror;w cnerxad acre .� Design tA3 PUD Plc t / Lodi 0W N MO' E `�,'%\011111481111 Drawn FMP R�SIdQO �! 07A5Y7' � �'+� aJ'\F, � Yf "qa4 I I I f70 —� — I ter a Aa�s ae y1P uw ry � Checked Lot 3 — Meadowland Business Park I I / L-exec' S g� w fta0.u's� — Va: 213 P.168 = c Scde 1• , 100' and I I I I soap _ -E �= Dote ate- tQ 20NLands of Homer and Marie Dubois I / SO7LK17'E woe J erred I I �?StO SJp Project 03225 Meadowl—d Drive South Burlington, V, moot I I uy 194 P21{2 I o tin 1niN � ARLBS' & L4AN1W Consulting Engineers, Ina ' /64 Alain Street, Colchester, Vermont OS-"6 I to ! Lot 4 V. I Chase ProPies & — DeveWment, L7D. _ Lot 7 — — Summer ice ,/olnt l/mtturo — -�---� I 80' ROW � - --'— �.� II Rim=2oS 99' ex. B•P'R' ' -___-' b• CB a M' oar=195.Js' -1 ' - .-- ---- Rew aee ,t-dh9 -- R �?01.5' SYR Meodow/ond yn M.. d r=James z RM,--1oao �-- ex B' Plc rew - B'Mv M 19217 ' l ♦ -_ y �+\ - `\\ � _--- gQ---\ -p2- _ 50'bu .-\' �j _ _ '� _. kill ' �%. ^ Q(�11 203 j �•\, IIII ^ 1 _ \\\ 1 _ -- so / �\\� \ \2,11 wenone 1 9 "� � Dili __ i_-� ----- ="r`-- Jf \� � \ \\\ V ee✓ eoenn I Am A.V&- a l / `\.\ IIIL- pasa /// urHoM Rer oB i'111 - l i 1 1 Il l l _ r./OBB H / R IASt2o1,n•s2' jY 1 - �\ I' M` 1 ' 1 IIII5 ' butler`, �� 1rot/md MpMIlllli r \ 11 /: cgs v.rl n 204 �- i 011 t PCYRl wlknA�''` f' / I11 �A' I�I / � '%� 1 IIII eew.or/ow ti` 11 III j \ Pai Mr ovr-tax --Pond Proposed Buil ng i i i i 7 OOO at P, If i 7 I l I _ _ _ FF aozo' 2os-- _ [fill f l I y; 1 Ik \\ \\\ 2atxl -- °vi l I I I I 1 X `•\klj i i 193i5 Or), storm t\ lIi1il il i1I L2 I My r-/97 f; \ \ t \1 /VA �•/.t%1,/Q'�2MY r"WW /111I <�P' , 1\ \ 1 \ 1 I 1 .I J -W96.5• od1 'III I M19E. Ts'1 M t \\� �\\ III 1 1 1201.? } w I ' 11 I I I Appigl: b'arr o/� `\ bacruro `\ 9 d'aMapr I '_._.._.. R� -1990' \ 1 ' I I 1 I t' "1 ( 75 ; 1 9l i f i l \ \ oxhtM �'� O O Qlow d' 111106i" ! I I I I FF-207 0` iiiiii \ 1 Y,p t A A 1 1 1 I I SabJkf�\2oca 1 N..ca/e i fill ' Lot 3 \O 7 A'"h s Su mer Ice ✓oint Venture a fill Arec=20. 2 acres iiiiii fille end 275 LYos.9 /N •vt/bnd Lga,o. ,�m,,,.,..r sx.•e I Will . ro.P#mme m.t _ I° • c�,o.r• no•,,,,�,•, „r 202.25�n / / \ J• \ i ; ' �! i \ srzctun Mv. -I-Y G5: I I I I II oub19135) . /\ \ 1. / / / 1 ,., \\ \ \\M My avh+J97,o• III 1 3x Mmwr ' •1\ 1 r'•� 1 IR. II I/111'\\1\kl\I\ A � J 5 ' I11111 �l 1 � mmnna,. yeF":.zozls 20 R'na111 / I I/ y !/ O' 20' 40' 20' 200" 1 Haut-19Adam' by ovy �o, II I' I I •e• l a l m' I Nsr ig• s J I I 1 I I I I 201M -bbnd Lot 2 I I I' I �'' ' I I' Ltr •4'p0� I11111 d✓MepfMn N 1 1 1 1 1' I 1' 1 1 1 I I I 11 I 111 ' (Mhee/ J Bar Sco% 1= AD' Munson Earth I Notes• Moving ,. mM h nor a bowna.y r A'aoe-ry /Me, mown oro ,ra.n o man e,r/nee � i 1 i 1 1 ae6a� y,� j 1 1 i j _ - --- 1111 7Je000N da PM*" by CM F'o 4v Asm tes 2 Ad t Mg pgoe,-ty Mes we /rwm Cty of SouM 6u4grm lox MW, !m 1 1 , \ k , k 1 1 1 I , 1 , 1 I I_ _ _ 1' q� 35r E —_ -----------i----\:\: /11 1 — 10/18/04 WVJt new 0—/N wet/and dNhooN mwked by Brod pf Ifhee/er cn east s/de of papnso/ I 1 — rjB'-setback D—iptim [heckee ,\ ,1p5 �•r; Design /A✓ Grading Plan Drawn FMP I lv e37523: E ... —� li �, NIP I cneokea _ _ Corporate Headquart 288.03 P, pored zo• H. et ✓. Dubois — — '�— ' I I �E ''Mt scale 1" = ao' k ,, Date -NT7,Tooa Land Air 1 zoo z m9 a m { Project 03225 Af—dowland Dm , South 8,, ngt t{l I I I I KRPWS & LdAISZ" Consulting F'ngineers, Inc. IBA Alain Street, Colchester, Vermont 05"N _______ lo/18/Ot MEMORANDUM TO: Project File FROM: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer DATE: November 10, 2004 RE: Spencer Terminal Holdings The following is a list of issues raised at the 11/9/04 public hearing to be discussed during deliberations: 1. No "Jake Brake" use on downhill section of Meadowland Drive. 2. No idling of trucks longer than 5 minutes. 3. No back-up beeper use between moo p.m. and 7:oo a. m. 4. Add berms on Dubois property with trees on top. 5. No refrigerated trucks. 6. Require a Development Review Board review of any new tenants. 7. Align the easterly access drive opposite Bowdoin Street and add curbs along east side of access drive. 8. Limit hours of operation. 9. Limit nighttime traffic. io. Require plan to reduce light intensity at night by use of dimmers, timers, and motion sensors. DECISION & CONDITIONS Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Planning Commission approves the revised final plat application of Summer Ice Joint Venture to amend a previously approved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into ten (10) lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 40.94 acres, Hinesburg Road. The amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into twelve (12) lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres, as depicted on a 25 page set of plans, page 1 entitled, "Meadowland Business Park, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc, dated 6/4/96 with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approval and stipulations affecting the subject property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall post a $47,400 landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value of proposed street trees and berm landscaping. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years from date of planting to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. The berm installation and planting shall take place contemporaneously with the road construction. 3. In order for the Commission to find that the proposed development will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to use of the highways, the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a) The project is approved for a maximum of 830 A.M. peak hour trip ends and 673 P.M. peak hour trip ends, Any subsequent development of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall require an updated traffic impact analysis. b) Applicant shall install, prior to occupancy of first building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on sheet SP15). VAOT shall approve the design prior to issuance of a zoning permit. c) Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Rte 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City. d) Each building lot shall be required to pay the appropriate road impact fee as defined in the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit or start of roadway or utility construction, all appropriate legal documents including 4 easements (e.g., utility, sewer, drainage, water, -recreation path, etc) and roadway r.o.w.'s (irrevocable offer of dedication) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 5. The applicant. shall contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund based on 1,260 feet of frontage along Hinesburg Road. The contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a zoning permit for any lot. 6. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit or start of roadway or utility construction, bonds to cover the costs of roadway, utility, and sidewalk construction shall be posted. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new street until such time as the street and r.o.w. is accepted and taken over by the City. 8. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 30,345 gpd. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The roadways serving this development shall be completed by 6/28/04. The sewer allocation for any lots served by a roadway or portion of roadway which is not completed by 6/28/04 shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. 9. The developer shall furnish to the City, at least 7 days prior to beginning of road construction, the name of the contractors doing the street and utility work and the architect and/or engineer who will stake out and supervise the work. 10. In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., streets, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc) the developer shall submit to the City Engineers "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 11. The plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner . Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to recording. a) Sheet P2 shall be revised to increase the size of the proposed street trees to a minimum of 2.5 inches. b) The note on sheet P7 referring to Thompson Street being a private road serving lot 12 shall be changed to refer to lot 11. 9 c) Sheets SP3 and P7 shall be revised to show a fire hydrant in a location approved by the Fire Chief. 12., Wetlands shall be delineated on lot 3 prior to development. 13. Deeds for lots 7, 8 and 9 shall reflect the fact that the western portions of these lots will be unusable because of the Potash Brook CO zone. 14. As provided in Section 605 of the Subdivision Regulations, if substantial construction of the project has not started within three (3) years (i.e., by 7/30/99), this approval shall be null and void. 15. The Planning Commission waives the requirement for a sidewalk on the south side of the main roadway (i.e., 80' r.o.w.) due to the provision of a number of pedestrian/recreation path easements over the property. 16. The existing drainage ditch along the south side of lots 1 and 2 shall be filled in contemporaneously with construction of the new drainageway as shown on sheets SP10 and SP11,. 17. Access (i.e., driveways) to lots 4-11 shall be from the side streets, not from Swift Street Extension. 18. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. pas Chairman or Clerk South Burlington Planning Commission to F Re: For Ian Jewkes - Land Air Wetland Issuef Subject: Re: For Ian Jewkes - Land Air Wetland Issues From: Brad Wheeler <bwheeler@sover.net> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:45:28 -0500 To: Krebs & Lansing <klengineers@adelphia.net> Ian, Today I conducted a site visit at the Land Air Corporate Headquarters project site in South Burlington to determine: 1. If the wetlands along the east side of the project site are Class Two or Class Three wetlands, and 2. if there are wetlands in the 200 foot buffer zone south of the southern property line for the Land Air project site. My findings are as follows: 1. There is a wetland mapped on the Vermont Significant Habitat map for this area located approximately 1,000 feet southeast of the project site. Based on today's site visit, it appears that the wetlands along the east side of the project area may be contiguous to the mapped wetlands. This would result in the site wetlands being classified as Class Two wetlands. This determination should be confirmed by the Vermont Wetlands Office. This project would be subject to the Vermont Wetland Rules if any of the planned construction activities are located in or within 50 feet of a Class Two wetland. Based on our review of the site plan, there are no activities proposed within 50 feet of any Class Two wetlands on this site. The small wetland that is within less than 10 feet of the proposed driveway is a Class Three wetland. Proposed construction activities that are located within 50 feet of a Class Three wetland do not require review under the Vermont Wetland Rules or under the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2. I examined the 200-foot buffer zone south of the Land Air project site. There are wetlands along the northwest edge of this area, but no other wetlands were found in this buffer zone. The actual area of review extended approximately 250 feet south of the Land Air parcel. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. I will be in the field on Tuesday - Friday. I can be reached by cell phone at 793-8367. Thank you, Brad Wheeler Bradley A. Wheeler, Principal Scientist Wheeler Environmental Services, LLC 301 North Main Street, Suite 2 Barre, Vermont 05641 Phone (802) 479-4500/Cell (802) 793-8367 Fax (802) 479-4600 1 of 1 11/9/2004 5:40 AM SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 September 20, 2004 Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Re: Corporate Headquarters- Land Air South Burlington Dear Sir: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. Details of water infrastructure should be corrected to reflect those found in the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District, the City of South Burlington, Colchester Fire District 91, and the Village of Jericho. Specifically, the fire hydrant installation detail should be corrected. All water installation work and water distribution material must comply with these specifications. 2. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public water system shall be protected with a backflow prevention assembly, and an appropriate thermal expansion system in compliance with the Ordinance For The Control Of Cross Connections Within The Water System Of the City Of South Burlington. Please contact this department for more information on backflow protection devices. 3. Eight -inch Ductile Iron (DI) water pipe shall have no less than three (3) brass wedges installed at each joint. Bury depth to the new main shall be six feet (6') to the top of the pipe. The new 8" DI main shall be Poly wrapped. 4. No underground utility lines or structures shall be installed within four feet from the water main on either side, from the top of the main to the finish grade, with the exception of storm sewer and sanitary sewer lines as stated in the above referenced Specifications. Trees shall not be placed over any watermain or service line, nor placed within 20' of any appurtenance, including fire hydrants. Generally, other underground utilities shall be placed on the opposite side of the road from proposed or existing water mains. 5. Separation between the water main and service line and nearby sanitary and storm sewer lines shall comply with the VT WSR requirements and the above referenced Specifications. 6. Prior to any building construction, the building contractor must contact this Department to discuss City requirements for meter sizing, meter settings, and backflow protection. 7. The SBWD shall be sent any future hard copy plans involving this project for review, independent from those plans sent to the Planning and Zoning Department. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in the above referenced Specifications. Prior to final plat recording the SBWD shall. be provided a copy of the final plans. 8. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all fittings, thrust blocks, main line taps, appurtenances, water line crossings, and testing. 9. Further review changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. The SBWD shall be provided a final plat for this project prior to recording for final review and approval. 10. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, AJayYdeau Superintendent CC. Brian Robertson Doug Brent George Dow Plan Reviews: Land Air Corporate offices � y IPe�nenL LR1 - � - Lot 7 t yantta• , yq _ - .ARnmse /ee S tT459 -V K _ ---�\� _ _Q--�- e>e-•.n w m�_.- m_reTervn_aa Ii _-c__ .-`S •�l�---- ->L "ate-.. .z�io /'�•-^•-fix.r oaw I LYeai N/E -_- ----- ----- AveS Inc. _-_ __ s "o [eae a waow 1 .________-_-__ = r . ---- • South 9xthgfon Lot 2 I hwr..aaae„ wJ l / \ _ Wit•♦, --- - _ er r 3 ,n --- - — -- - - N/F �nrowM Qaf ♦ a,. Qa A/ caul Earth 1 _ ` •,.,,, �' q I a �" l! $ I i r 1 1 _ V7F y p �N Location MOD q l �.soo of _ " tL Owner /ntbtmatkn: I I � Summer /ce Joint Ventura i 153 Summit tt, South Bw/mglon, VT 05404 N/F (802)-658-6120 1 L7eenAcrox Inc. _.._. App//cant /nfarmot/an: Co-App/kimtt /nfortnotlan: 1 I �� + ❑ t�rl.^l it `♦ ; O c/enter - _57al Ho/dingS L.L.C. 1405 i A/arg Obho/s `:j �� I� 1 I c% 8aiir 5 .�/eticer saut N U Mgt/ Rood I •4� � P.O. Box SOJ Avenue C Soutn tiurlingto2 VT 05403 1 / �`�""-•�.. ;♦♦ I I{W//ston, VT 05495 (802)-86?-B687 (802)-863-5062 1 I ner. •..ar .r -_ .,_ ``1 / Lot 3 Summer /ce ,bmt Venture �•w e++e� I - a Summit Street Ln \ amps..~ ` �//7NnM /LY ✓o%nt t/enture 153 South B.Hi gton, Vr 05404 Areo=20.? acres (802)-658-6320 /ndrst io/ and Open Spore Zoning Oist-t I Y %' Total area = 20.2 acres 1 R'Oposed Lot Com-ove - Lot S1.• I /, / �'/ ��__�__\ ��`♦ ' , }' a -a .#W New S Rowrgs 26.000 s.t eAaerw 2.9l I New Parking A• Roads =,i = 14.7X o' ❑ Total C mvroge O = TOCtl°n 1z.x a e< = 176T Front Yard Co -age = 37Z 1 , Ptmtdno- I - / p/oywes � 1 space/amp/ogee = 50 spaces P ❑ 26, 000 sq. R. ' 0.5 ,,votes/1, 000 s7, it = 13 spaces Proposed Parking nSpoces 6=3 I Propo67 ( Ind./ 2 had/toOPed) / Lot 2 1 'U�\ 1 �,, �, N/F I I � ' mow' \ ez nere ❑.ter - _. .��/ �� ' AhYlean w „ng II jAeneM tbrd A'I� x oo. r e -----_ h.a`v Drrd oP sP" Oiefrrtf mnr-9 _ — N i 8 ? 49 ----- I _ 4 55 \\ __-`� G• - 288.03 I / Notes /. ma b nor o boun"hr X A erhpr.9 /he= into.,, =e ern a P� evurae V /�' B,ab- 'Neodo,t ds Pa* • by CAWrnghesAsaacpfes. Abutthg P,epedy /hee are Abn CRY of S ffi 8u T Ngos (h v eegren 1 he t NL &,&06 - - - - _ — - - —---------- Ci� S+O — — — ---- Legen 20 - - ------ �9�0 ----- _---------------------- h • Rrw pp, /«me i I _ _ _ - Dote -W-d Deeo oti- oedw Dare - '1 _- Design Site P/an O Canoere mawmmt to be /LA.1 Concrete mwwment to be set at aMectim of Omer 1 Drawn FMP A piape,,,e1p,e 11 Checked Corporate Headquarters � _ -------------I ------- D. zs' bo' 100' 150' YGk)• �. ,_ _ 50' Scale - --� YLh, rRight o/woY 1 - Jx Y7, 11Me L and Air --.S11 Fxisth9 groane cmtour �________ ________ I Date r ® 5e1_ monhde I ar Scale 150' Project 03225 Swift Street Extension-Hinesbu Rd South B/nu ton, Vermont " = Ix hy&-t A"' WS & LANSINC Consulting L'ngineers, Inc. SP 16I A(ain Street, Cote%esterr Vermont 06446 TO: Project File FROM: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer DATE: November 10, 2004 RE: Spencer Terminal Holdings The following is a list of issues raised at the 11/9/04 public hearing to be discussed during deliberations: 1. No "Jake Brake" use on downhill section of Meadowland Drive. 2. No idling of trucks longer than 5 minutes. 3. No back-up beeper use between moo p.m. and 7:0o a. m. 4. Add berms on Dubois property with trees on top. 5. No refrigerated trucks. 6. Require a Development Review Board review of any new tenants. 7. Align the easterly access drive opposite Bowdoin Street and add curbs along east side of access drive. 8. Limit hours of operation. 9. Limit nighttime traffic. io. Require plan to reduce light intensity at night by use of dimmers, timers, and motion sensors. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 10, 2004 Ian Jewkes Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings Dear Mr. Jewkes: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the October 19, 2004 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, I--- I ��, k--) Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. C DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 OCTOBER 2004 Ms. Quimby moved to continue Preliminary Plat SD-04-61 and Final Plat #SD-04-64 to 9 November. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Boucher rejoined the Board. 7. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-04-74 of OB2, LLC, to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of: 1) a 3000 sq. ft. restaurant, 2) a 12,500 sq. ft. nightclub, 3) a 1620 sq. ft. personal service use, 4) a 1500 sq. ft. general office, 5) a 2408 sq. ft. short-order restaurant, and 6) a 1880 sq. ft. short order restaurant. The amendment consists of: 1) constructing an 8'x9' walk-in cooler, 2) constructing an 8'x40' storage container, and 3) constructing a 3'x3' refrigeration condenser pad, 1216 Williston Road: Mr. Statesir said they have been under construction and have found some things that need to be more efficient for them and for the city. Green Mountain Power will be removing a pole and the structure that holds it up. Wiring in that location will be underground. They also need space for some outside storage. Staff had no issues. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-04-74 of OB2, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Final Plat Application #SD-04-69 of K.W. Burlington, LLC, to amend a planned unit development consisting of a 76,630 sq. ft. shopping center, drive through bank, and 106 room hotel. The amendment consists of: 1) constructing a 2,511 sq. ft. structure to cover an existing swimming pool, and 2) reducing the number of rooms at the hotel to 105, 1285 Williston Road: Mr. White said they will add landscaping and a bike rack as requested. Mr. Belair said the only issue is a request for a $1930 landscape waiver. Mr. White said there is no more room for landscaping and the site is well landscaped. Members were OK with this. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-04-69 of K.W. Burlington, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 OC'TOBER 2004 fire. He is also concerned with maintenance of the private drive in winter. The applicant said the homeowners association would be responsible for plowing. The neighbor to the north noted that water and sewer lines will cross the wetland. The state application says there will be no culvert. He wanted to be sure the applicant complies with that. Mr. Belair said they have to comply with conditions of the state permit. Mr. Veve said the sewer lines are for a force fed system not a gravity system. The pipe is not anchored at a particular place. They could cross the stream without there having to be a culvert. Mr. Veve noted there are no plans for a gravity system. He wanted to be sure the city's approval is based on the state approval. Mr. Veve also noted he had been approached regarding a gravity system. Mr. Dinklage said any change from what is proposed in this plan would have to come back to the DRB. Mr. Veve said he was also concerned with pressure on the hydrants to be adequate to get to all the houses. Mr. McClellan said they did an analysis of the whole system. Ms. Quimby then moved to approve Preliminary Plat #SD-04-67 and Final Plat #SD-04- 68 of Mike Anderson subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application #SD-04-61 and Final Plat application #SD-04-64 of Spencer 'Terminal Holdings for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) construction of a 26,000 sq. ft. distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no - construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south located at the end of Dubois Drive: Mr. Boucher stepped down during this discussion due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Belair noted that part of a driveway accessing a unit will cross a wetland buffer. Input is needed from the Natural Resources Committee, so a decision cannot be made at this meeting. Mr. Dinklage noted receipt of a letter signed by a number of residents of Oak Creek. Mr. Plummeau asked that Oak Creek and Ledge Knoll residents be notified of future meetings on this application. He also asked that the Board take their concerns seriously. Ms. O'Grady asked if there will be diesel trucks at this facility. Mr. Dinklage said he thought so. Ms. O'Grady cited reports on how diesel trucks contribute to haze. She felt this was important for more than just abutters. -3- 0 y I Lot 7 o Summer ice Joint Venture Vol 387 P. 439 C/ass wet/and Pond V t I \ i IDetM7t1o17\ I Pond Q� \ \ I "' % w Class // wetland \ % Proposed 20' \ �edestriion Easement Moving , - 57 1 i i 50' setb]gc/( ' 2� 03' SOONAt83-25'260 E "26 MMOM 0080 I 9' V V 10' sewer easement 1 1 � 1 )Detention) Pond I I "A '• i 1 I (Foreboy) t o Lot 4 Chose Properties & o De veiopmen t, LTD. Vol 597 P. 481 -- _ — --I mom mono 31 V,S84-59'-36-'--W, Class /// wet/and Class /// wet/and ` Lot 3 a, =" I Summer Ice Joint Venture Vol 387 P. 439 � $o o ' - Area=20.2 acres I / I 4 ) Coss /// wetland I \ F3 r I I I � '_I, / Terminus of original 20' i' Pedestrian Easement Class /// wetland zoning 01strict/ _ - - '- \ ' a1 and Ono n Spate 51100 tndastn t Zoning District 1042 51 Quadsn/ s N 8249'35� E ntheast � m SOON i / cote the ) L I to ""lot nest a waiver Lot J to l ' � 1 ,gppliconts request buffer from 1 Proposed 200' required 200' zoning.buffer erty , p the Dubois p P Zoning Buffer _— _ pede� n E°semi Proposes- - - - Gre Vo Krebs & Lansil f Main Street Consulting Engineers, Inc. Colchester, VT 05446 phone (802) 878-0375 fax(802)-878-9618 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL: DATE: October 18, 2004 From: Ian A. Jewkes To: Ray Belair City of South Burlington RE: Spencer Terminal Holdings Application, Meadowland Industrial Park Dear Ray, Please find attached a copy of our Plans with a new wetland delineation on the east side of the proposed project. The wetland delineation was performed by Brad Wheeler last week. All of the wetlands on this side of the site are Class III. All of the proposed improvements are outside of the Class III wetland limits. We have hired a consultant, Jon Wilkinson, to examine the noise generation from this project. Mr. Wilkinson has taken measurements at the existing Spencer site. He is working on his report today. We will forward any information to you as soon as we have it. Mr. Wilkinson will also attend the meeting. Please call if you have any questions or comments. 0 KREBS & LANSIN CONSULTING ENGINEE INC. 164 Main Street COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 (802) 878-0375 FAX (802) 878-9618 n TO G"' I / L WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ DATE I J V' JOB NO. O �� S ATTENTION RE: the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 5 � vn Fr✓ i 51r THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: Brian Robertson, Associate Planner q-,Ttz� RE: SD-04-61 and SD-04-64 Date: October 15, 2004 Agenda #6 Spencer Terminal Holdings appeared before the Development Review Board on September 21, 2004 for preliminary and final plat approval of a planned unit development consisting of. 1) construction of a 26,000 sq ft distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no -construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south located at the end of Dubois Drive (minutes enclosed). The Development Review Board continued the hearing until October 19, 2004 to give the applicant time to revise the plans and submit additional information. Staff has not received any revised plans or additional information since that meeting. Any additional materials that we receive will be available at the meeting. CITY OF SOUTH BU LINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 15, 2004 Ian Jewkes Krebs & Lansing 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings Dear Mr. Jewkes: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, r' BetstMc nough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURUNGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 vIP� TrAv October 15, 2004 Ian Jewkes Krebs & Lansing 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings Dear Mr. Jewkes: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 at 7.30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, `4 BetstMc nough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITE' OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 6, 2004 Ian Jewkes Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Re: Minutes — 596 Meadowland Drive Dear Mr. Jewkes: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the September 21, 2004 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy Mc onough Administrative Assistant Encl. ��a DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BARD 21 SEPTEMBER 2004 010 Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-04-61 and Final Plat Application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) construction of a 26,000 sq. ft. distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no - construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south located at the end of Dubois Drive: Mr. Boucher stepped down due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Belair noted the applicant would be expanding the PUD to allow for the moving of the "don't build" zone. Mr. Jewkes said they would use municipal water and sewer. They will have a new stormwater system which meets the new standards. Mr. Plummeau said this is the first neighbors have heard of this. He asked about hours of operation, noise, turning movements, etc. He said the building design suggests a pretty active facility and they are concerned with noise and lighting. Mr. Jewkes said there is landscaping to buffer noise. There is over 200 ft. to the nearest home. Mr. Plummeau said I-189 is further away and noise is very clear. Landscaping won't work as a buffer to noise. Mr. Bolton said he wouldn't want trucks left idling out there with diesel emissions. The applicant said their trucks are timed for 5-minute, shutdowns. They have no refrigeration units. They also do have plug -ins. Mr Bolton recommended a stipulation to insure there are adequate plug-in facilities. The applicant, LTL Distribution, said their trucks are loaded in the evening and go out in the morning. They deal in general commodities, not hazardous materials. They are like UPS or FedX, but the shipment sizes are a bit larger. Local deliveries are done in smaller trucks. Mr. Jewkes said they estimate 32 peak hour trip ends. Mr Belair said this is within traffic limits. Mr. Dinklage noted that staff recommends the application be continued in order to have the applicant address noise buffering. Mr. Jewkes noted that Munson is asking for more landscaping as a buffer (Austrian pines every 20 feet). They have no objection to doing that. Mr. Dinklage reminded the applicant that they must meet the city's noise standards. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 SEPTEMBER 2004 Mr. Belair said they applicant must provide a plan showing what the whole PUD will look like. Mr. Neaghly said he had met with the Rec Path Committee and they will take the path out of the wetland and bring it around. Mr. Kupferman then moved to continue preliminary plat application #SD-04-61 and Final Plat Application #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings until 19 October. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P.M. Clerk Date -7- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: September 16, 2004 \drb\subUand_air express\preliminary_final Application received: August 12, 2004 LAND AIR EXPRESS PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD-04-61 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-04-64 Agenda #9 Meeting Date: September 21, 2004 Applicant Owner Land Air Express of New England, Ltd. Summer Ice Joint Venture 115 Covington Lane 82 Church Street Shelburne, VT 05482 Burlington, VT 05401 Engineer Property Information Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. Tax Parcel 1155-00596-C 164 Main Street 10 District and Hinesburg Road -North Scenic Colchester, VT 05446 View Protection overlay District 20.2 Acres Location Map y �yrm Al }T 7Y7Y r` : t� ------------- CITY OF SOUTH BURLIN& TON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final Spencer Terminal Holdings, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking preliminary and final plat approval for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) construction of a 26,000 sq ft distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the same tenant at 596 Meadowland Drive, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no -construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Drive to the property to the south located at the end of Dubois Drive. The sketch plan for this project was reviewed by the Development Review Board on November 18, 2003 (minutes enclosed). The proposed use is a conditional use in the 10 District and the Hinesburg Road -North Scenic View Protection Overlay District. However, in accordance with Section 15.03(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the application is being reviewed as a PUD, so conditional uses do not need separate conditional use approval. Associate Planner Brian Robertson, referred to herein as Staff, has reviewed the plans submitted on September 18, 2003 and has the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements 10 Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 3 acres 20.2 acres Max. Density n/a n/a �l Max. Building Coverage 25% 2.7% Max. Overall Coverage 40% 19.8% Min. Front Setback 50 ft. 50 ft. �l Min. Side Setback 35 ft. 280 ft. Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. 200 ft. Max. Building Height 35 ft. 24 ft. zoning compliance n/a no residential units proposed SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. CITY OF SOUTH BURLING TON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. The entire Meadowland Business Park has an approved water allocation, which applies to this proposed project. In addition, the water infrastructure has already been installed, so it is only a matter of connecting this building to the system. The Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department is in the process of reviewing the plans. His comments should be available for the meeting. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The subdivision received a 30,345 gallon per day sewer allocation. This allocation is still in effect. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The proposed grading plan is outlined on sheet SP-3 of the plans and the erosion control details are outlined on sheet D-3 of the plans. 1. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to this property is proposed via two (2) access drives off of Meadowland Drive: a 26' wide drive on the westerly side of the proposed building and a 24' wide drive on the easterly side of the proposed building. Both of these access drives are proposed for ingress and egress. The two proposed access drives are at least 400' apart, which is compliance with Section 15.12(E) of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to Section 15.12(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the easterly access drive is aligned with Bowdoin Street, on the opposite side of Meadowland Drive. The proposed truck parking lots are very large to accommodate the large trucks this site will cater to. Therefore, circulation on the site should not be an issue. According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, the 18,500 square feet of distribution and related storage space is estimated to generate 15.17 P.M. peak hour tip ends (Land Use 30). The 7,500 square feet of office space is estimated to generate 11.18 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Thus, the total project is estimated to generate 26.25 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final The subject property does not contain any identified wildlife habitat. However, the site does contain a pond and some wetlands. The wetlands are partially delineated on the plans dated July 27, 2004. The wetlands on the easterly side of the proposed building do not appear to be delineated on the plans. The proposed building and parking area are outside of the associated 50' buffer, as shown on the plans. However, this cannot be accurately determined until all wetlands on the property are delineated by a wetland professional. 2. The plans should be revised to have a wetland professional delineate all of the wetlands on the property, prior to preliminary plat approval. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. According to Section 6.04(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Industrial -Open Space 10 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and Burlington International Airport. The 10 District regulations and standards are intended to allow high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open character of the district, minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and enhance the visual quality of approaches to the City while providing suitable locations for employment and business growth. The location and architectural design of buildings in a manner that preserves these qualities is strongly encouraged. Staff feels the proposed project is in compliance with the stated purpose of the 10 District, as outlined in the Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. There are significant portions of open space running along the western and eastern portions of the property, so staff feels this requirement is met. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The Fire Chief is in the process of reviewing the plans. His comments should be available for the meeting. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the westerly side of the proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian and recreation traffic through the property. This pedestrian easement is being relocated within the planned unit development. 3. The applicant shall submit legal documents related to the new location of this pedestrian easement, approved by the City Attorney, prior to recording of the final plat plans. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final 4. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The subdivision plans for the entire Meadowland Business Park show details on utilities, lighting, and stormwater management. These have been approved by the City Engineer, so they are acceptable for the proposed project. A lighting point by point plan for the proposed project is contained on sheet SP-5 of the plans, which meets the requirements in Appendices A.9 and A.10 of the Land Development Regulations. In addition, the applicant submitted exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the proposed lighting. The proposed lighting fixtures are in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement and adequate parking areas. The applicant's building elevation plans are on sheet A-1 of the plans. Staff feels the proposed building accomplishes a desirable transition from structure to site and from structure to structure. The site includes a 20' wide pedestrian easement that will help facilitate pedestrian movement. In addition, there is an existing recreation path running along Meadowland Drive. Therefore, staff does not feel any additional sidewalks are necessary on the property. According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the 18,500 square feet of building dedicated to warehousing, processing storage, and distribution requires 9.25 parking spaces. The 7,500 square feet of building dedicated to office use will require 26.25 parking spaces. Thus, the proposed project will require a total of 36 parking spaces (rounded up from 35.5). The plans show a total of 67 parking spaces in the main parking lot, adjacent to Meadowland Drive. According to Table 13-7 of the Land Development Regulations, a property with 51 to 75 parking spaces requires three (3) handicapped -accessible parking spaces. The plans only depict two (2) handicapped -accessible spaces. In addition to the 67 standard parking spaces, the plans also depict 28 parking spaces for trucks on the rear portion of the property. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING Wrb\.subVand air express\preliminary final 5. The plans should be revised to depict a total of three (3) handicapped parking spaces, prior final plat approval. The dimensions of the proposed parking areas meet the requirements in Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is proposed in the parking lot to the west of the proposed building. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The majority of the proposed parking is located in the front of the building. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district; the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The scale of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site and existing buildings in the area. The height of the proposed buildings is 27.5', which is in compliance with the Land development Regulations. The proposed project is located in a business park in a area where industrial uses exists, so staff feels the scale of the proposed building is compatible with existing buildings in the area. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. Staff feels this requirement is being met. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. Staff feels this requirement is being met In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street; to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final The proposed project is nestled between the wetlands on the site. In order to provide any access to adjacent properties, wetland encroachments would be necessary. Because the project is in a large lot, industrial area, staff does not feel access to adjacent properties is necessary. However, if the property to the south is going to be developed with residential units, as second means of access, most likely through this property, will be required. This would require an access easement connecting the property to the south with Meadowland Drive. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans show a solid waste facility on the easterly side of the proposed building, which is adequately screened. Landscaping and Screening Requirements According to Table 13-9 of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed project has a minimum landscaping requirement of $14,500. The applicant is proposing $23,170 worth of landscaping, which includes eighteen (18) Austrian Pines on the property to the south. The landscape plan and landscape budget are in compliance with Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area with twenty (20) of more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. At least one (1) major deciduous shade tree, whose caliper is equal to or greater than two and one-half (2.5) inches when measures six (6) inches above ground at the time of planting, shall be provided within each parking area for every three thousand (3,000) square feet of paved area or every ten (10) parking spaces, whichever is greater. The landscaping plan for the off- street parking area is in compliance with Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans depict a snow storage area along the southern boundary of the property. Pursuant to Section 13.06(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any utility cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board. The applicant is proposing a screened HVAC pad to the east of the proposed building CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\preliminary final View Protection Zone 6. The applicant shall submit information on the height of the proposed building in relation to mean sea level, prior to final plat approval. Other The City Engineer reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated September 9, 2004 (attached). 7. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Engineer, as outlined in his memorandum dated September 9, 2004. 8. Sheet SP-1 of the plans shall be revised to correct the owner and co -applicant address information for Summer Ice Joint Venture, prior to recording of the final plat plans. These addresses are labeled as Summit Street in South Burlington, which doesn't exist. 9. Sheet SP-1 of the plans shall be revised so that the parking calculation information corresponds with the Land Development Regulations, prior to recording of the final plat plans. 10. The plat plan for the entire Meadowland Business Park PUD, and the plat plan for the Dubois property to the south, shall be submitted prior to recording of the final plat plans. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board not approve Preliminary Plat application #SD-04-61 and Final Plat application #SD-04-64, until such time as the requested revised plans are submitted for review by Staff and the Development Review Board. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Bill Spencer, applicant Permit Number SD- 61 - ( / CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. i 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) Summer Ice Joint Venture, 153 Summit Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 802-658-6320 Fax 802-658-0349 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 387 Page 439 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Spencer Terminal Holdings, c/o William Spencer, PO Box 503. Avenue C. Williston, VT 05495 802-863-5062 Co -Applicants: Homer & Marie Dubois, 1405 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 802-862-8687 and Summer Ice Joint Venture, c/o Mark Neagley, 153 Summit Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 802-658-6320 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Ian A. Jewkes, Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., 164 Main Street, Colchester, VT 05446 802-878-0375 Fax 802-878-9618 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS Swift Street Extension 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1705-00125 (Summer Ice Joint Venture), 0860-01375 (Homer & Marie Dubois) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) The land is currently undeveloped. b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) The proposed use is for a 26,000 square foot trucldng terminal with 129,266 square feet of parking area and circulation drives on a 20-acre parcel located on Swift Street Extension. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) The proposed building has 7,500 square feet of office space and 18,500 square feet of distribution and related storage space. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) 1 story, maximum height 27.50 feet e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) NIA f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees The maximum number of employees is 50. The number of company vehicles is variable. The average on site should be approximately 17. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Relocation of 200 foot buffer and recreation path. 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 0 % Proposed 2.9 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 % Proposed 17.6 % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 0 % Proposed % 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) $ 1,200,000 b) Landscaping: $ 23,170 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) Total site work = $360,000 (paving $132,000; gravel $129,000; storm drains $46,500; water and sewer $14,000; electric $8,500; miscellaneous $30,000) 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) 323 WE b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) 22 WE c) P.M. peak hour for entire property (in and out) 36 WE 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (24 hour trucking operation) 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday (7 days per week trucking operation) 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Fall 2005 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I 1" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). 14) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATUREJDF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF - PP ICANT SIGIV�TURE OF CO -APPLICANT � P; SIGNATURE O R ERTY OWNER ter~ IGNA RE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION /� 6 REVIEW AUTHORITY: �evelop I ment Review Board Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: omplet Inc plete ire or 0 lanning & Zoning or Designee bate SPENCER TERMINAL HOLDINGS SWIFT STREET EXTENSION South Burlington, Vermont ABUTTERS LIST July 28, 2004 Project Parcelm Sumer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 Tax Map 1705-00125 (All under 0860-01150) Co -Applicant Parcel Homer & Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-01375 Abutters Chase Properties & Development, Ltd PO Box 2283 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0254-00005 Green Acres, Inc. PO Box 2123 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0860-R1150 Munson Earth Moving 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 Tax Map 1705-00107 Diane J. Wessel 70 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0850-00070 Scott L. & Roberta S. Pennington 26 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00026 03225:abutters list Larry W. & Ginette D. Brainard 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00028 Donna A. lee 30 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00030 Russell J. & Pamela A. Smith 32 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00032 Anthony A. & Diane P. Graziano 34 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00034 Paul A. & Charyl P. Houchens 36 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00036 David W. & Heather H. Main 38 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00038 John M. & Susan M. Hood 28 Dubois Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0575-00028 Robert M. & Linda H. O'Kelly 30 Dubois Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0575-00030 Ralph J. & Jeanette M. Mitchell 32 Dubois Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0575-00032 j KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. August 9, 2004 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Final Subdivision Plat Review Dear Ray: 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 Fax (802) 878-9618 On behalf of our client, Spencer Terminal Holdings, we request the City of South Burlington consider the enclosed Final Subdivision Plat Review Application jointly with the previously submitted Preliminary Subdivision Plat Review scheduled for September 21, 2004. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, AlA. Jew s, P�Ef /sml Enclosure 03225:final plat cover letter Permit Number SD- b I - CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) Summer Ice Joint Venture, 153 Summit Street, South Burlington, VT 05404 phone 658-6320 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page#) Book 387 Page 439 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Spencer Terminal Holdings, c/o William Spencer, PO Box 503, Avenue C Williston VT 05495 phone 863-5062 Co -applicants - Homer & Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 phone 862-8687 and Summer Ice Joint Venture c/o/ Mark Neagley,153 Summit Street, South Burlington VT 05404 phone 658-6320 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Ian A. Jewkes Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Inc. 164 Main Street, Colchester VT 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS S�I6 &P-54114 4N0 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1705-00125 (Summer Ice Joint Venture 0860-01375 (Homer & Marie Dubois) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) The land is currently undeveloped b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) This proposal is for a 26,000 square foot trucking terminal with 129,266 square feet of parking area and circulation drives on a 20 acre parcel located on Swift Street Extension c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) The proposed building has 7,500 square feet of office space and 18,500 square feet of distribution and related storage space d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) 1 story, maximum height 27.50 feet e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) 0 Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): The maximum number of employees is 50. The number of company vehicles is variable. The average on site should be approximately 17. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) /20'Loci4rraA,- or '000)cu f3K Fig=E�2 I}W,b 4?0C e4_'A 71`0N /0,4 i 74 h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. g) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers? Ale c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: 1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel: b) Building Coverage: Existing 0 square feet % Proposed 2� f 0620 square feet % c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing d square feet _ _ _% Proposed square feet % �• % 2 d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing (V square feet O % Proposed square feet % 10) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks. height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking 11) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) $ b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) $ 2 3 "V c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) i Jaxk 360, ooG 12) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out) 3 ,z 3 v %"C': .Z,Z V i 3G VTR 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 9AA1 �;- 1A V h01612- e �el' 5 7�4-"' 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION / ALjr/ 15) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 16) PLANS AND FEE w F4 4f lk � Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11 " x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). 3 14) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE F APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF - JPICANT SIGIP�TURE OF CO -APPLICANT SIGNATURE 04RriPERTY OWNER 44 IGNA RE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date I 1 1 1 I I \ \ 1 � 1 1 ♦\ \ 1 --- ___ I 1 pp Cot 4 \� I Lot 10 p3 1 O Chose Properties & 7 '^ Lot 1 Development, LTD. I Summer /ce ✓o/nt 1'a Summer Ice ,loint - 1 1 ✓o/ 597 P.481 Venture J 1 Vol 387 P. 439 I 1 Vo% 3B7 P. 439 \ 1 - - -- - - - - - Green Acres, 8 J Vol 213 P. 168 Meodow/ond Oriw I Spencer Termino/ Holdings LLC - Applicant I Lond Al? Site / Lot .3 I, / Summer Ice Joint Venture Lot 2 Vo% J87 P. 439 Munson Earth Moving' I / Vol 651 P. 157 _ alt & Roberto Pennington 1 - Vol 209 P. 326- _r - I Homer & Marie Dubois Larry & Ginet t e Brainard I Vol. 179 P 126 1 1 v 1 Vol 211 P.281 I 1 I I r 1 1 I 1 Homer ct Marie Dubois I Donna A. Lee Vol. 179 P.116 Vol. 357 P.139 I , IRussell & Pamela Smith Vol. 265 P.40 Q I - - Anthony & Diane Gror/ono Vol 218 P.195 n - - Paul & Cherl Houchens Vol. 500 P.162 - - Dovid & Heather Mo/n Vol. 454 P.85 - - - _ Robert & Linda O%Celly I Vol. 211 P. 41 / ✓ohn & Susan Hood 1 VoL J23 P.430 1 ub ors Ralph & ✓eonnette / Mitchell - 1 1 Vol. 212 P..i6 1 I , 1 1 11 1 - - �— Diane J. Wessel Vol. 194 P.142 -- - Spencer Terminal Holdings, LLC. — Applicant Land Air Corporate Headquarters Abutters Green Acres, Inc. Vol 1/3 P.168 SPENCER TERMINAL HOLDINGS SWIFT STREET EXTENSION South Burlington, Vermont ABUTTERS LIST July 28, 2004 Project Parcel Larry W. & Ginette D. Brainard Summer Ice Joint Venture 28 Knoll Circle 153 Summit Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Burlington, VT 05401 Tax Map 1002-00028 Tax Map 1705-00125 (All under 0860-01150) Donna A. lee 30 Knoll Circle Co -Applicant Parcel South Burlington, VT 05403 Homer & Marie Dubois Tax Map 1002-00030 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Russell J. & Pamela A. Smith Tax Map 0860-01375 32 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Abutters Tax Map 1002-00032 Chase Properties & Development, Ltd PO Box 2283 Anthony A. & Diane P. Graziano South Burlington, VT 05407 34 Knoll Circle Tax Map 0254-00005 South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00034 Green Acres, Inc. PO Box 2123 Paul A. & Charyl P. Houchens South Burlington, VT 05407 36 Knoll Circle Tax Map 0860-R1150 South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00036 Munson Earth Moving 85 Shunpike Road David W. & Heather H. Main Williston, VT 05495 38 Knoll Circle Tax Map 1705-00107 South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-0003 8 Diane J. Wessel 70 Highland Terrace John M. & Susan M. Hood South Burlington, VT 05403 28 Dubois Drive Tax Map 0850-00070 South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0575-00028 Scott L. & Roberta S. Pennington 26 Knoll Circle Robert M. & Linda H. O'Kelly South Burlington, VT 05403 30 Dubois Drive Tax Map 1002-00026 South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0575-00030 Ralph J. & Jeanette M. Mitchell 32 Dubois Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0575-00032 03225:abutters list U"ITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANT E14G & ZONL�IG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 1, 2004 Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy Mckhou9 h Administrative Assistant Encl. SPENCER TERMINAL Corporate Headquarters SOUTH B URLING TON, VERMONT INDEX. Sheet SP-1 Site Plan Sheet SP-2 Utility Plan Sheet SP-3 Grading Plan Sheet SP-4 Landscape Plan Sheet SP-5 Lighting Plan Sheet A-1 Elevations Sheet D-1 Details Sheet D-2 Details Sheet D-3 Details REc city of e <� U��n9ton AREOS & LANSINC 164 Blain Street ooee sir a zaw Colchester Cons7ilti�cq_ Vermont 05446' �A+�r aT?75 �'-�. Engineers InC. B02-B7B-0975 I I Lot 7 _ — \ Summer Ice joint VCn uro— \ ------- -- - � B'hx our=I95. IS' -. _ .�.....n Al. ew-atmdha r'uy"y eigl \ ., slwiz wnc •,---- Ren-2gd0' sc 8, PC B ><� -- _ — —1922r ' ---. tcL ----- 71 0X '�. .'. aaa i I U.#�fM r 1 ! 7 I 200.5 .srasra� ••� � dr�eor:.n \i\ Pond i O f HMO 1 \ 1 APcrox. —ing damage \\\\I 1 \�� � CYss // wNandQQ 1 i � f 1111 ; \ low 1111 I 1 111 I I / I11 11 yy / \�ili � ill ,YJ i i Lot 2 I t I N Munsoon Earth Mving t 1 1 Notes- lI. ms <r nor o boaadwr w r Prmerrr /nos sno.n o-e non, o pan enddee 7/eal Nmdr PoYr" br Oil Fngireern Asmriafes I I a i4ff o Lot 4 Chose Properties — — -- 'Development, LTD - In o_--F--- --- ja ---------- OLJ1® 0 I II I ,ul f x Proposed .W—sd'NYAC Office 7, 500 s. f. I I 1 1 fF 2070' - I-- I l l l j /1111, � ----- _ -__ omP r t ^ ..... l!l�! reroring eal' \ \\ 11111 edosnre :�4 r liilj G rd+r\e. see 0efwls 111111,l ,� I <_ 11111 a I } r Ail— fill 1 1 11 9� � 1 \ 111111 I � fF�20ZO" i 1 J IIII11 i 1 11111 � ,,IIIII t I Ills Inu ' I �t fff ; Inn ;un i Iln• lnl � r t . �111 I 111, 1 202.75 ; 1 ,II111 t 1 , 111,1 I igllA 1 ,y I 11 TO f4yIt 2. ACuffm pr prfY I --are Fom Ci(Y of Swfh M BuAin9ton I x cps (in 1 `\\�� '� • — — —�—w'M �''\ Il„l�y e/9/tw /9arrl N/F Ir •�.. H.\$ J. Dubois Pedesennn 08JAi' 1 — 288.03 I �Fosemenl IN® S 8459 J6" jjjf.jl' Lot j Summer Ice Joint Venture Area=20"2 acres p /// Met/md N 824935" .E — — '-- 1042.51' landscoplh Schedule Unit E O ted Oescipth— A'x pianh'ty skmbw - Cost A—trpn Pi— 8"-lo" t% 2S ® $495 f11,385 Red Nth^ 2-1/2- c f 5 v.7 Ow f;WO Palmate Ash 2-1/1' cd. 5 fA 1450 f2,250 / s Pv.uylwYr "A�ro'1' Oen A— 78- sp✓ead 6 Q a' SIXf6t1% db'dmM'mb` F'berry : Shwmrocw" 2 9aoYon 25 o f8o f2000 .#upd.. •do �" Burning Bush X tdt 6 -hem Oo IJ60 1 AR X two 19 =✓. w $125 2,375 M.vibFd ' ✓aP — R 9 p'-64W 2-1/2- a.. 4 �M tW fI,2A0 f2.z170 RECE/V EFD _je 9 cil a �C 9t®n Btu, 0' 20' M' 80' 120' 160' 200' Bar SCC/e 1- - 40• 0ere rowed oeedprtw, cneao-ee �ro Des1gn Drawn AIMP FLandscape P/an Checked Scale 1 - 'w' Corporate Headquarters Dote "f272 Land Air Project 0J225 Swift Street Extension-/hnesburg Rd South Burlington, Vermont ARF,8Se & LlNS'JNC Consulting Engineers /nC. --` SP-¢ 1B4 Aain .Stree4 Colchester, rermont a"4re I I o I Lot 4 F I Chase Properties7D. & — — - ----- -. -_ - 1 o Development, L—_ 5• _ Lot 7 Summer lee bHt ►@Rtury - - — —_� 80' Bow '- - -rip v a-k, S'=,BS19 .. '. •----- - 845936 W StreetFXteffe7en x w �. �" _ , Y' Y a e SWo 55r1R 'w Ll e'mK J921T _ a 6 m Y i f to - e' u,, our=19zz,' "*' er,� - P- .:,s= P P �/,. [ •- c k �� _ — - +• .`F =e . (rLI� q. �-- _'s=.1\ .. y a- P�Z� ri 4ifPd _ 1" CYasa ,N wtroM _-_ - -�A s 't ,�.•' #. GYid values ore the ri/ummonce provided by m the new lighting, Appror roeornm o/�` - - _ - - - - S`- •' y y P s : -. 6 foot -comes os cdcu/ofed by edsraq damage d' •, a Yla �,'. v + - - s, Luxkm, V2.3.2, by Cogoer Lighting. .seas' 1. s,-, ,w • f' , . - ,.. �' " t: r 1 '•� ` Y Y TYPE ° TYPE Pond io.s•xicL� ON Hl .s Proposed Building , ` * 0.taarrtow Nka»harce LeM✓s j.( 1 foot --de Ofrrce -..L T �-_ 0..2 foot-conde 7,500 s.f f. A 03 fool -cadre iii TrPNN - sF ono 0.5 foot- ro_, 1.0 e • Y > 2.0 foot--dY. \_.� 30 foot -comae .10 foot-ea,de i{` Y Y ' Y -fi 1• T' } 1 9 1 APPa�.as lorolw+ o/—\ '1 ?• 4/ r r ) y ,, ' .KEY W' 7 Lot 3 i tin droina9s u a 9 � LAY r } YF :, ,• , v ? � ., Summer /ce Joint Venture j`.� ,,.:- Y r;y `•- +f 2070. ,,� Area=20.2 acres rIPE A . P de mounted � P Lumrnoire Lumork Prrooaee ,, tP v'.. s # ! (•vy - Y Mwnme� area toff, 175 tu 0l4h moW 25 " h' LY /// wet/md . y \ •, y °. y. a Y Y• s 7 Bose cover 1 �. Y r' ,ice-', . � 1 [ t- " '} -� 11=1 • ' I � s m�,.r errrg s y ( �, ' P L- ! # i': recommendations 7w / ndotions. ' ',.4' y v *F I•� f s*.Y'� +�'- ` ,, TjpICO/ Area Light Detail N.T.S. 82 1042.51 3" E _ F I /�/-83I I p H. ✓ Dubois LUMARK' �"^� � isnfwlblr.ra.J..t �e�ywXlwL.r. r r+�e IIrIMCh: TYPE Lu_* MN Comp t Mb'/ M- 10 roll Mefd-na/ide, ": Farwmn o. ervectar wmr uounr,d of la e LUMAkK l 0 , C� TYPE A Lmrnaek tknutrer Area Llot )l5 eo((, Ne(d-/rMMe, Argo Cutoff Pde Younfed or 25" 0' T0' Aa' e0' )1Y!' 16ii' 100' A Bar SCOle 1 • _ 40• vote i 71 Drive-in Doors M— D— 1—g Da L—dhg Docks EIL,5-r EI-EVA-FION 750, OFF. 4' Roof Overhung p .T, PF IV comp W. ADMINISTRATION TRUCK TERMINAL 14A MAE BREAK Rom -.A-g N 4' Roof T R F L FF FI-009'PMN - OFFUf F - /!Y-O" J'a 0, L000Y"og D.— LosA g WEST E1-EVA7-10N r,s6,0" F­'t Creen 1Ng 1l 0, 170' Durk GroY or tbown I., L 0 IX.0' NOK'r" EL-DIA-FION /11, ln"Ce 4'R—f Ow -g — ftM dons 50UrH,ffUVA-r/0N P - 151-0. RECEIVED AUG 0 9 2004 City of so. Burlington FOR PERMIT REVIEW i I Lot 7 — Summer Ice joint Venture — —_ — — -�— - "� 0 `" _ �w,Q� _7- -....• Plc Nofw=,Q99B.s7 a/o SjfStreet Etsees,' B" m• avf=l95I5� i� al ------ --- -�B vovb192T1' P BBM _ e'c ryb _--- ----- _- \y5 I 1 ---- I / - --- ----- — - - - suv - ♦♦ .lqamc ko[ut/wv wJ 9 sew, .% 1 R1F,=1990' Mv. r_1dlk5Y Nw 091v Rbn-201.5• . sldOld Mv-1-19590' I 1 I SO' bvf/m i 2our weBmre \ j abwrsertrr� I ? rrreal�,-I r•' .w..re ,«fo., r Pond 1 '� i Mw mr=195.w• I / I j i I I/ awwwwtlm� fp-r��a•r1IbI / \\ 1 1 Fd� 1 I 1 1 I \ a AetentRwr \ Ford $" \ \ 1 1 r \ Nnr prrar� Hacroe I sairtiq �Ww� I _..----••'-�y_.. _" •1 R4n=>99.0" \,1 ; by out=196.9" y CAm / wBbld \ New w+e � I ;• Mv. ah I °o° Proe.we as• i I I E.wwww.t 4 / 1 1 � I Lot 2 N/i Note:• Munson Earth rand is rw, a bmraalwy r v gown rmas .bp.,r pa epa a Plan eanuae Moving Pork" by aw Eng —, Assxiores. 2. gbaffhy pepwly /has ms o, n City of South BuHhyrm, ra Naas (h egild /pmf. 1 --------------- N 8325 23�E 288-03r - - 1 1 M. o Lot 4 f � I I t c. ---------------- .4rrr�l III III MIT] `/✓eve CB /T =ZORY- Nv ovf= 19B Corr �, a- aammra, r \ rsed Buil ng office s ao Hvnc vae 7,500 s If. rF 2070 rcfonm9 waI _rr sn maaziro !mice Sag OefaBs AD-5s(pw I New lywp003 0-2= 25' hv. M=196d5' Fr> 2070•. shvcrvra' Rein=I990' 1 i L--- I I Rbwr� secrww javim F» Pared 'Ave ' 1 I \ f 50' setback —. 1 1 N I I H.J Dub" PwWerr/wr E veer 1 I 200' Zmhg Brf/w II II I N- ego Rhr=202.25' Mv. M=19K25 a Mv. t-19615' A' , Wj-7 fi n-2 25' Mk' " 19563 hv, per=193 S5' Rew 1P /8 Rhr 5" -195 m by =19510 rev. wrI-/9510' Raw CB N S Rhr=20iS (({L -197. lnv. ourI97 A0' O S 84 59 36 w N lix.31, alias N/ ",ii-d Lot 3 Summer ice Joint Venture Areo=20.2 acres Potable Water Supply and Wastewater Design Flows- Nbstewvter Disposal and Domestic llbter Supply Design Fbws Flows for Smp/ayess Type of emp/o).e Number D — 40 Off/ce stoff/A/echanics to roto, _p/oyms = 50 (aY shtfts) flows for emp/oivvs = 50 emp. * 15 CPO/emp = 750 ORD rota/ Design Flow = 750 GPD • 0.9 redrlctlon for water "M9 Oxturm : 675 GPO ProFsct to be served by munlcgoa/ water and sewer Legend -' ewaawr aN aa.. a wmeaid o - -•- - Ra...r_e.. � riwav w� mM•y ---v.—_- Ave M/s'.w ywn lx r�r N 8249 35w .E-� — — f042.51r 0' 20' 40' BO' 11a' 180' 200' Bar scale 1 • = 40' Dab -med I Desrrlp— LHecked Gore Design /A✓ Drawn F�/P Utility P/an Checked Corporate Headquarters Scale t- - � Date .ixy272a0I Land Air Project M225 Swift Street Extension-Hrrresburg Rd. South Burlington, ✓Canon! ARRRS & IUASIAW Consulting Rngmeers, Inc. I64 !fain Street, Colchester, Vermont 9"4(6 I o Chase Lof Prope4 rties & Development, L10. — — Lot 7 _ — - ---_y \ Summer /ce Joint Venture �� / Rim=705.99• --- '� 1 I B" Inv. m=I95.29' ex. B� PVc $_84 59'i6" {4 - Hew Nee sroneM9 _ — -- Ran za! 5' egn /nv our 1965' P2 R Street Exf°n �' �I _- 1331.31PW ' Rm 92 _ B M M 19117'NO \ __ _ 101 i \�. n, \ IIII I _ _ - ----`` \\\\\\ \ '\\\ pass , /// Ilsi/ard ^ emrq o�ucryoia 1 .9h i •\,1�1 I r '�', X / �l i �I. ' \ ,�;\\ / ii,i I �� Mw PQ'I IIII S£ cy— // 10I.s' I I \ I d 1 / I.I 11'! tland ! Mv. lM%Q7' I,1111 \ J I , .r%i'ck 013 � 1 III I \ 1 w14.19190 i IU I I _ t =704. p l j `�� M✓. our_ IM40 I i \� III IIII I ! (erred) \ % ese erM ax � / 1 / � 111i r \ / m•, B+ �I I I Pond Proposed Built .ee HVAc \ hills ` (^• /� / ❑ 1 11 I / Ilrllj j �./� 1 l \\ / Illil �y�$e�. vlli�ll ill L t p o 3 Illij 1 •V /0� 1\\\\ m,at --- m� r� G n 1\\ \,leroMm9 rd/ C/! ®a �V i •--,.-J_.- � I 1 i \ 9h3 -` \`% \ 1 �\\ �� ___-`-Lo:n mvo.,ua :�, 11111 New a9 '1 • . (� G l f/ `. •�' Ijt1 I I t r '��\\4`\ \\ 1 , \`� II II I Mv. our=�97.I0' iI 1 0 etdl^ r i V Inn L�..._._J.7E 1 I I I I \ \ \`\\ \I 1.1 I NM. f8 11111 i !'✓/y. /=tMJw�O t!1\�`�\\:\ it 1 1 I I I I J RMr=10125' • f � �� - 11111 I I II 0 Nv M-l96.B5' � I , •\ '\ ` � �\ `\\ 1 11111 1 I i o'P My our=l96.73'1 y l l ll '� '"i°,wem`KK•. �••` \� az Lot 3 I m i 1 f1�1� I i I Aanro. locena, , :v:._.._..-_------- ? am-,99a � " IIII I I g oz75 i i n .l i exnrMy o-oMale� I it Me «rr=/9B.9• •`. ` \ IIII ; I 'I I J� i Summer Ice Joint Venture \ aa. r weisw \ \; 11 1 I 1 I 1 I Area=20.2 acres rn o I a" at re rr l I I I I inn \ v \'•� ^l\ �, �\ ` ` I 1o1.2 i He. ce F 1 zo Be \D �\ `' :t✓ 1 \ = 1 1 1 My g %15 our-196.15 IIII PM—.d 20' �1� •` 1 I I a I IIII I I I Eanwt , _ I x101.4 I M , Ili 1111 Legend -- 0275 , 703 IIII I ' � / I o I I cm nNx..r.rr m n• ..r 14 /' � �- �� I i1 I / i l I� � 11 I�II� CYosa /// wet/wW �nn. ra•.> \ ay / • 77T j1 , II, II m✓•ree�, -20J.0' I_ Rm=�oz�z's' fQliil -'r `\ A 11 / I akuoruro Ell My n-195B3 II1111 —.w• rxrry ,mwe a.,row r I /// ` \ \\ N.. av�.l9).0' xc Mv. ouf=79335'1 111j1 m ewrM +•..,e=.nd. 1 ''' % J IiFl lii� ,I1:i1111, 11; ,.b e0o' x 2.7J ! 1 1 J 7�1 I,i 111 1111111 I `'' "/ IIII11 / % 1 1% t I I I I 111%/ i I I Li He. ene aectw E R� 25' iilll ou/-194.3' My M=19520 I i l l l l o' 10' b' BO' 110' 160' 100' 1 a �Il lllj �I�IgI I Ve+1B'AD'efU^ Lot ? t t iiiiii IIII l Ltr , a.003 uiiii BOr SCO16 1"= 40' Munson Earth Notes I� I illlllll 'dry lilt�41 Moving I 1. 1nu a ear o bauioWy r niyary IMes bo.,r aro nae a e,rnroa I ` i 1 11 1 arebay,� I I 1 i'y _ - _ _ _ _ I11 I ]/eadoe/wrda Pak' by dW En9Mewkr9 Aasocbres l @ I 1 I 1 I 1 1 _ _ _ - - - ® 11 I 1 � I z la r� y M., a. na orr a nee swra �. (M I, � � i 11 i � N 82 49'3") _ _ / MI / �- -- •� ___-_ +� area , n etbock ' • �' .1spr srMu9e ^I� own _ '\\\ OoN rolkee Oeaep rion Checkee Dole l I --- �_ � F r � •S.1d'7 I Design /.9✓ Grading P/an FA,P 1 _ — _ 1 2523e E "� \ `\ Scale ° Corporate Headquarters N 83' _ �� wgee..e p. H. ct .L Dubdts scale /- 40' Date Jdy1L 2 88.0,3 Land Air �e r 2004 I I 200' Z-M9 &1ff- Pro' cl Q1215 Swift Street Extension-Hmesburq Rd South BuNington, ve/mont _ I I I I I .Y/PLBS & L.4NS1W Consulting 8ngineers, Inc. 7_____ Sp !64 Alain Street, CotcAester, Vermont 05446 Road Construction Notes (Ail ee.- es ro odd w+ar mwr ro pokiq a m. ox w.a) loft 1. New road shall be constructed to the /ore and grade shown an the drawings. The rood and ufd'ty locations shop be typically 4' bit detailed unless otherwise shown. earls !-1/2' Tjpe /N LYewe xirp a.rr Nry emted /Qo rod 2•ppe 2 Methods for construction of sub -base shall cant [a Vt. Highway Specs. (1990), ?O.i 12 'svbgrode' I, oil respects Oros 2 1/7' Tjpe p —1 ropy rod lo9d determined by the Engineer. see s'te pion for moss slope ( X '- J. Gave/ sub -base for pavement shall conform to Vt. Highway Specs (1990), 704. 05 table 704. 05A co— bft—lhaus concrete pawmmt 4. LO-1kg course sha// conform to Vt. Highway Specs 1990, 704. 05 table 704.05A, rme Shoulders shall conform to section 5h Y ( ) -... st se U.shed,grouch ;.p[ J/e' A tnae 704.12, Aggregate for Shouldx- 99re9 •4'rfF¢ g course +r'-05A viler. 5 Bituminous concrete pent shall conform to Lt. Highway Specs (1990) Section 406. Binder coarse shol/ be type lI d9d Fj runmh -earring coarse steal/ be type3Y. K, sore -kg k,.sas 6. Any sub -base or subgrode disturbed by Contract-, or rendered unwitable by construction mochnery shall be remowd and12r '04, i .. COW" - (h Co-, p-< ppe block `[' red 6'-0" replaced with epprowd granular backfe/. Sub -base shall haw 95X of moxknum compaction density before road construction. d—wLe. 7 The Contractor sholl be responsible for all compoctim tests far the road, foundotions and utility trenches. 9erKee : Geen m/f coated roX. B Fill material for rood embankment shall be approved by the Engineer. Fill shall be placed in 6' lifts and wetted and compacted with sotielbl, y compaction equpment. The Contractor shop perform 2 canpaction tests every 100' at the limits of density, d Proctor). " 1? ymd:.f,W.(xTOJ II3 the tiling goeratim and shall recompact oreas with less than 95X of maxknum (Stand �� � la9Melr 9 Ohm applicable, the Contractor shad follow Vt. Highway Specs (1990) Section 2al 11 for placing and spreading embankments ILT �� iY'�-�T'1 I I_ I I (— - I 1-I 2" rink,, s" ono,. to awo. urstwg g es _ Vwad tech (rya.) 10 Road n fil/ sections steal/ be placed and compacted a minlmum Installed, 3 feet above top of my utility to beInstalled,bel-e trench is excowted for ppe placement, In trenches and cut sections the Contract- shall prorrde a/l necessary sheeting, Mwori 500X and or mderdnh I I • • •—i e III— I (—I I I -1 I I I 111-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I"• —� 10' dimetw (tip) - sharing and brocng to maintain compliance with al/ OSHA/Vv&YA regulations as Ordered by engineer I ��I—� 1—� I( —I 11. Sand f7f/ sho/I —to- to Vertu-t Highway SOeel6eati-s (1990) 70303, table 703.O3A. 1 _ tkie posts set ro o WPM of 2' 40' h o 10- ei ,et- q~h .d,q%d bob, J'-6- lArad rrM concrete. Cote fi-nes Ma be 2" an dye a ,w ee o by Me dwthg w -d shop be emiehed erth a the tmg, Pants she be -vypM with brace rod Meer -Y /I. , are hues rod !o e' l,, t to ewnes. J' dimmer- gate poab shot be used b gates long- Man 4 leer T ical Pave t Cross Section Trash Enclosure Detail Mohr Dn'ww o are hat crowned, but -e p-- lewted os N. rs n..s. shorn in the detod, below when viewed ham Swift street Extension, facing south, each m-way slopes toward the proposed bopding of 1/4' per foot. % driwwpy I two 2' too file ur eirumhavr 4av-w pow' g u� ro ADT — 4LK aJ I r-fr 12' - O' 12' - O" 4' L — `20M mase I2' grev.' seebasr� e' saw 70404 cams Mkee hYk 500x AOT Spec'. JgIQ7 1IhBm/ee oNrAgd 9-- among to be 24' drga*e motwtw' .Shed W m n.. Proposed Drive Detail IV. TS Frame A' cow, N ate R-1642, Let,-- LC 266 - squa BHtk /awing sou (5) roursee max. (2) courses inn. Do not mart- aside face of bri J,. use red h-'-.d sews bilk only. Provide cast in p/ e steps when depth teed 6' flan, rkn to nwf. Use polyprop)+ e pnstk rungs with f122" node 60 steel f-cwnent Or equal inn• Asphalt coat kte.fk Urrdsru bed motor-' -- / Fhm does to alai! Gout hone to bkak Aetoak bhG's bsfam ma-tanrng Boat A/ wltA arosdrod grow/ Cwnpocf to 95X Of m—h— awn Y 1 (Stand-d A-ocf-) -O' Rag gasket - Mantic AS7M C478 )',—t rant--ced cono.te mardnas and ca - by Cawp Pr.00lt aowold -aqua! Do not m-fa Asw fore of manha .. M-hoe she'/ be -ovum tested end. lowest pkrt Is still exposed. gwnoew -.drd -C t kin Place - prase -.sea/ gasket to, a/ ppe pwnel-ti-s. 14==si e c-o"ewbrL 4G1�0 pte ro 1 1/2" cnshee storm Detail New Sanitary Manhole (Dog House Style) N T.s NOT: 1. Sewer !work- ro -tor mars shop be m a-.Vb ce w/M the ;ecromm-deal et-db ran sewage works• --coped ran ,tat. a,n rde 2. Sewws shoe be isle at /east 10 feet Ao tapy limn y exafhg - prgd - ant - Me bet-ce ~ be .nedwrree edge to edge, ff !ha eb-ce cannot es abrakwq thin Me Apes shoe be hstel/M acca Chg to Mee. 1p d tp w0te, Sdecf bark/l/ ccmpactad (d Meade r- werw 6" f �95.[ stand-d 1B' inn. (dose sz) aw.ke proctor density. —�- O Sewer S.wws arosshg ante, mans slid/ be 1ek1 fo ,,O d o nha wrfkw distance of le" tel - piles. Sewer pants ww be egrdrf-f e -for os possbb horn the w i-- phfs Ah- tt a kn,—s fa dram prop -as sews" .wind be designed -d --led ears ro -rw ppe -d sbe be pressure tested to asswe-twfghrnen paw fo bxkakg. Sewer / Water Separation Detail N T.5 D+2' ro noew .z.ehg rlw c-boar- sad es oral - -s n--Mb b P'lM a9G - IfI.WA f>�w,g eroMW +�YtlY rgvWfkne eddka mor-w ,ha - roh no er-., venew rib- 3' h olmrwtw - 95X 90,T kom ! nMs doY o" 9[mdad stmd -1Pt�NRs are proof- prat[- canped a ndknf.d Uss .vend a w 114' ro 314" aurae ere,- W oral-- by - o o/� .are �r».se emo mawam maw ewadge Pwe) _ T' R jkl sryorown nabrhn ( A �w/dM -d !alas 6 Fw eennwr- J%' fe J%" waN a See rx-e M ad pas ere. d.,rrrhe wrw, r>Pa are uwarmb.d motors/ Scnitory Trench Detail N.T.S. Construction Notes 1. The Contractor wp/ be responsible for al/ construction of water man, storm and smil y sewer systlens as shown on the pions He will be respons.Dte for a necess-y adapters httng; etc. to make connections to the existing and proposed uAlihes The Contract- shd/ be responsible for all work shown ar implied an the plans md/ referenced in the specirrcotions and permits fie Contractor spat/ submit f rppro-I by the Engineon all types of mated and products used Sanitary &Storm Mains 1. The pipe for smif y sewer and storm shah be PYY' gravity sewer ppe SOR 35 (ASTMD 3034) with rubber sealing rags All ppe shall be laid to the /ere and grade shown an the plans. 2 fie installed sanitary sewer ppe shall be low pressure air tested in the presence of the Engineer. After ppe aoanng, the ppe sect/ (m-ho/9 to manhole) slip/l be tested act -ding to the following procedures, An Interne ppe pressure of 4 pounds per square inch greater than my back pressure due to a water table shall be created. A mnsnum of two (2) minutes shag be allowed far temperature stmillmtim. fie ppe section shall be crosidered ocamiab/e whin, tested at a pressure of J pounds per square inch great- than my bock pressure, the section does not lose am at a rote greater than a0030 cfm/s. f. of internal ppe area, Separation of Water and /or Sonitory & Storm Mains 1. No water main shall be N than ten (10) feet [o any smlt y sew, storm -wer or sonit-Y mmhale and In, (5) feet to any catch basin. P,oride minimum of 18' vertical separation between water man and storm/emit y sews, resting and Now. In add'tion to the obow requirements, a// water /nee and sewer hoes and manholes shall be thoroughly tested by the Cmtroct- In accordance with the Enwronmenta/ Protection Rules 9/l0/82, Appendix A, Section A-02(JW) and A-04(GdH). Note: Al/ consimcton shall be attarnil/shed in accordance with the standards set f-th in the latest edition of the public works Vsc/rrmtkn of the City of South Burtmgton and referenced specipmt/ons n the case of c-01,t, the move strngmt speclfkotion slid/ pop/y Cmtroct- shop keep a log book of of least three swing ties to service locations and y po' is of depectim - -t- anon Rttngs. Books shah be turned awr to the Owner upon acceptance of wall.. Porallons to the top of novice. lly/ 9(so be recorded e\CG,'j�7lVAi� AUG 09 Z0 L'%jy of S 0e01 6MOP FOR PERMIT REVIEW Erosion Control and Construction Sequence 1, fie purposes of erosion control shot/ be discussed with and approwd by the Engineer and the Town of Williston prior to any c/eanhg, grubbing, stripping or construction of any kind. 2 A// erosion control shod/ be placed as shown an the drawings or as ordered by the Engineer A// erosion control measures shall be, at a m/n/mum, inspected weekly and maintained to fulfill the intent discussed above. fie Contractor shall mointoin the erosion control measures until the Engineer is satisfied that permanent ground carol has been established and that further measures are not required 3 Nhen erosion control measures are deemed no longer necessary, al/ materials detained including silts and construction debris shall be collected and dsposed of in a manner acceptable to the Engineer and the rown of IN7/iston. s. if nigh/y erodible sods are encountered the Controctor may be required to provide pte malting, gabfan ar nwt mattresses, rip lop or other measures as necessary to prereit erosfan. the Cantroctor shol/ stockpNe hay boles to protect, at a mnrnum, all work in progress. A// exposed embankments --rid/ be topsoAed, seeded and mulched as soon as possble after canshuctron. 5 fie Contractor shall use water and/br calcium chloride itr dust control The Contractor shelf also sweep Leroy Rood as required to maintain dust control Steel states airs+ an down &— side of / - Srow leace or Al—fi En.+iofmce J/ro6 En.rofm+cr or 41kdf foal ate, Jobric Filter fabric on upstream side staple fWAa to f ce Form 12- deep trench Stare A /ay fabrk' m bottom rnver with g v ens —1.1 At flaw �I e li I FOR PERMIT REVIEW IJ I I i Section A —A A m�plans pirm, pare . we s. prro aw T iyn co/ Temporary Silt Fence Erosion Control Barrier N. T.S AND PEDAL STEEL ITS W/GORDON STONE: s teaching experience. ngs and Live appearances i, Moe, Strangefolk and Cowboys. 863-4497 or rdonstone.com. BASS AND ACOUSTIC 5-string banjo, guitar, ongwriting and more. iced teacher, very afford - es. Any style/level/inter- ly, 802-658-2462 or 75@hotmail.com. FIDDLE instruction with ced dance band musi- Levels. Technique and phasized. Peter ne, 802-759-2268, c@gmavt.net. ET LESSONS for all ginner to intermediate Start the school year or pick up an old all Heather for rates, J questions. 318-8199. NO LESSONS for all un from a patient and :ed teacher. Andric 802-310-6042. Berklee graduate with background offers tes- uitar, theory and ear Individualized, step-by- oach. I enjoy teaching tyles/levels. Call Rick : 864-7195. LIS TEARING NOTICE f Burlington is submit- msolidated Plan Annual ce and Evaluation PER) on the expendi- mmunity Development �t and HOME Invest- iership Act funds for m year ending June o the U.S. Department & Urban Development. Copies of the Report will b available beginning Septe4, 10, 2004, at the Community & Economic Development Office, 149 Church Street, Room 32, City Hall, Burlington, VT 05401 and online at http://www.cedo burLington.org/cdbg/cdbg.htm. The public is encouraged to review the Report and to com- ment, through September 28, 2004. A Public Hearing on the Report will be held at the City Council meeting of Monday, September 20, 2004, in Contois Auditorium, City Hall. Comments will be heard at the Public Hearing on the Report and on housing and community development needs. For more information, or infor- mation on alternative access, contact Margaret Bozik, Community & Economic Development Office, at 865-7171 / 865-7142 (TTY). PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVEL- OPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board wilt hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hatt Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, September 21, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. to con- sider the following: 1. Final plat application #SD-04- 60 of White Rock Development, LLC, to subdivide an undeter- mined size parcel into two (2) parcels, parcel #1 being of unde- termined size and parcel #2 being 0.055 acres. Lot #2 will then be further subdivided into two (2) lots to be added to the rear of 444 and 446 Country Club Drive. 2. Preliminary plat application #SD-04-61 and final plat applica- tion #SD-04-64 of Spencer Terminal Holdings for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) construction of a 26,000 sq ft distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the same tenant at 596 Meadowland Dr, and 2) relocating a 200 foot wide "no -construction" buffer from 596 Meadowland Or to the property to the south located at the end of Dubois Dr. Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board September 1, 2004 The Burlington Democratic Committee will hold its nominat- ing caucus for Justice of the Peace on Tuesday, Sept. 7 at 7 p.m. at the First Congregational Church at the corner of South Winooski Ave. and Cherry Street. For more information call city chair Mary Sullivan at 862-6632. ► support groups DON'T SEE A SUPPORT group here that meets your needs? CatL United Way GET -INFO (a confidential help line) 652-4636, Monday -Friday, 8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. ADD PARTNERS SUPPORT GROUP forming. Does your part- ner or spouse have ADD (Attention Deficit Disorder)? Would love to get together and share experiences, support, chal- lenges. Please contact addpart ner@yahoo.com. WEDNESDAYS CIRCLE: A Transpersonal support group, every Wed., 6 p.m., Innerharmony Community Wellness Center, Rt. 100N, Rochester, VT. 767-6092. A sharing circle focusing on person- al growth, transformation, spiri- tuaLity and heating, led by Jim Dodds. THE HEALING JOURNEY. The Women's Rape Crisis Center offers a confidential ten -week support group for women who have sur- vived sexual violence. Burlington - area, call for location. 6-7 p.m. Free. Info, 864-0555. DISORDERED EATING SUPPORT GROUP: Do you struggle with anorexia, bulimia, or binge eat- ing? I am looking to start a sup- port group to help others and myself in moving forward on the road to recovery. If you are interested in joining a new dis- cussion/support group and are over 20 yrs, please email Jessica at jessLyn6 @yahoo.com. Together we can make smalls award to a SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION more fulfilling ntestyle. New England: Info, Blythe DECLUTTERS SUPPORT GROUP: Leonard, 878-0732 or atbtytheL@ Are you ready to make improve- aol.com. ments but find it overwhelming? WOMEN'S WEIGHT LOSS SUP - Maybe 2 or 3 of us can get PORT GROUP: Do we know what together to help each simplify. to do? Yes! Do we do it? Not 453-3612. always! Sometimes the answer is PARENTS TOGETHER: Support mutual support — for free! Let's group wilt be meeting in Rutland decide together what works for on Monday evenings. Snacks and us. I want to start — do you? childcare provided. All groups Anne, 861-6000. are free and confidential. Please BIPOLAR SUPPORT GROUP call Amy at 247-5460 for more open to new members. Meets information. downtown. Our goal is to WOMEN CHANGING: A continu- become healthy and happy. For ous educational support group info, call Gerhard at 864-3103. for women who are interested in ALS (LOU GEHRIG DISEASE) changing patterns in their lives. monthly support group: For Wednesdays -ongoing. 12:30- patients, caregivers and Loved 2p.m. CaLL Angie at AWARE in ones who are living or have lived Hardwick, 472-6463. with ALS. Third Thursday of the SUPPORT GROUP FOR WOMEN month, 1-3 p.m. Jim's House, who have experienced intimate 1266 Creamery Rd., Williston. partner abuse, facilitated by Info and directions, 802-862- Battered Women's Services and 8882 or vt@alsanne.org. Shelter of Washington County. AL -ANON: Thursdays, 12:30- Please call 1-877-543-9498 for 1:30 p.m. at the AWARE office, more info. 88 High St., Hardwick. Info, REIKI SUPPORT GROUP: July 472-6463. 18, 1-3 p.m. Fletcher Free WOMEN IN TRANSITION: Join Library, Burlington. Alt levels of a support/social group for students and practitioners are women who are separated or welcome. For more info., contact divorced. The goat is to form a Joan at 860-4673 or Lynn at circle of friends for support and 893-3064. social activities. If interested WANTED: Fellow painters to get email Katherine at together bi-weekly for coffee and MKR27609@aol.com. to discuss our work. Support SMART RECOVERY: For info, each others creativity! Show contact Bob at 425-4058 or your work. Meet at local down- email carmody@madriver.com. town coffee shops. Call 658- BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION 2976, if interested. of Vermont: Daytime support AHOY BREAST CANCER SUR- group meets the second Thursday VIVORS: Join our support group of each month at the Fanny Allen where the focus is on living not Hospital in Colchester, from 12-2 on the disease. We are a team of p.m. For more info, contact Polly dragon boaters. Learn all about Erickson at 847-6941. this paddle sport and its health- METHADONE ANONYMOUS: A giving, life -affirming qualities. medication -assisted recovery Any age. No athletic experience support group. Tuesdays, 7-8 needed. Call Linda at 802-434- p.m. The Atano Club. Directions: 4423 or email: dragonheart Rt. 15 Fort Ethan Allen entrance, vermont@gmavt.net or go to: Barnes Ave., third right on to www.dragonheartvermont.org Hegeman Ave., #74 on left. All EMOTIONS ANONYMOUS: are welcome. Fridays, 6-7 p.m. The Society of TRANS PARTNERS support group: Friends Meeting House, 173 N. Meet and talk w/other partners of Prospect St., Burlington. Free. transgendered/transsexual people. Info, 479-0684. 12-step program The second Friday of every month. designed to help women and R.U.1.2? Community Center, 6 men with depression, negative p.m. 860-RU12. thinking or any mental/emotion- HEPATITIS C SUPPORT group: at problems. Second Thursday of each month. SELF REALIZATION: Social/sup- McClure Multigenerational Center, port group for like-minded peo- 6-8 p.m. Those who have hepati- ple interested in spirituality, tis, their friends and family yoga, psychic experiences, tran- members are welcome. 454-1316. scendence and transformation. ARE YOU A BUTCH, F2M, Burlington. If interested, call Jill StoneButch, TGButch, TransMan, at 877-3375 or email Femme, High Femme or any jlo@together.net. other description of Butch, FtM NAKED IN VERMONT: The pre- or Femme/feminine woman? If mier Nudist/Skinnydipper organi- so, join us as we plan fun activi- zation in Vermont offering infor- ties and offer each other mation library, message board, resources, support and friendship chat room, yahoo group, and within the Butch/FtM-Femme more. (ALL FREE) Visit www. world. For more info, contact nakedinvermont.com. Miss Morpheus at missmorpheusl @yahoo.com. Gaec krfS �n CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPAIRTMENIT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 17, 2004 Ian Jewkes Krebs & Lansing 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Re: Spencer Terminal Holdings Dear Mr. Jewkes: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, September 21, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, � f � F i Betsy M onough Administrative Assistant Encl. KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS, AC. 164 Main Street COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 (802) 878-0375 FAX (802)Q8788�-9618 TO WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ l upnrul' oy v e omwuam i DATE JOB NO. ATTENTION ----------- RE: tic� O - ;�oo� ev . ❑ Samples y10 the followin2items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION C b` S l C i�v THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 NOVEMBER 2003 has the authority to limit accesses. There is also a driveway shown for Lot #3 very close to the one being proposed for lot #1. He suggested a shared access for lot #3. Members agreed and stipulation "n" was added as follows: Plans shall be revised to show a shared access drive with Lot #3. Mr. Kupferman noted that the Fire Chief has in the past been concerned about access to the rear of buildings. This may create a problem. He also asked about stormwater. Mr. Llewellyn showed the location of underground storage and holding pond. Mr. Steinzor cited the danger of approaching this area incrementally, especially where the area is in flux. He stressed that the existing traffic problems won't be solved by dumping more traffic onto the streets. He suggested putting off a decision until there is a better context to work in. Mr. Boucher noted there will be big issues to solve at Final Plat. Mr. Boucher moved approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-03-56 subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Messrs. Bolton and Kupferman abstaining. 6. Continued Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-03-02 of JAM Golf, LLC to amend a planned unit development consisting of 264 residential units and an 18-hole golf course. The amendment consists of approval for "as built" berms located on the east side of Dorset St. beginning at the Old Cross Road intersection extending north through the Holbrook Road intersection: Mr. Farley moved to continue this application until 6 January 2004. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Sketch Plan Application #SD-03-71 of Land Air Express for a planned unit development consisting of a 24,540 sq. ft. distribution and related storage building with more than 15% of the GFA in office use for the same tenant, 596 Nleadowland Drive: Mr. Boucher stepped down due to a conflict of interest as an adjacent property owner. Mr. Willard noted the property is in Meadowlands Park and will be a corporate headquarters. 6840 sq. ft. will be office and the rest will be distribution and service. Mr. Willard said they will address concerns in staff notes. Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to meet with the Rec Path Committee. Mr. Willard showed 8 acres of wetlands that will remain untouched. Mr. Dinklage asked about the hours of operation. Mr. Willard said the facility would operate 24 M DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 NOVEMBER 2003 hours a day. Mr. Belair noted there are performance standards that limit noise that can be heard from a property. Mr. Willard said they will screen the property with trees. He also noted that the site is in a very low area. No other issues were raised. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 11:00 p.m. "An �1,(` i' Clerk. cy - Date -7- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: November 12, 2003 \drb\sub\land air express\sketch Application received: September 18, 2003 LAND AIR EXPRESS SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-03-71 Agenda #7 Meeting Date: November 18, 2003 Applicant Owner Land Air Express of New England, Ltd. Summer Ice Joint Venture 115 Covington Lane 82 Church Street Shelburne, VT 05482 Burlington, VT 05401 Engineer Property Information Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. Tax Parcel 1155-00596-C 164 Main Street 10 District and Hinesburg Road -North Scenic Colchester, VT 05446 View Protection overlay District 20.2 Acres Location Map I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINu rON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\subland air express\sketch Land Air Express, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting sketch plan review of a proposal to construct a 24,540 square foot building for distribution and related storage, with >15% of GFA in office or other principal permitted use by same tenant, 596 Meadowland Drive. The subject property contains 20.2 acres and is located in the Industrial and Open Space (10) District. The proposed use is a conditional use in the 10 District and the Hinesburg Road -North Scenic View Protection Overlay District. However, in accordance with Section 15.03(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the application is being reviewed as a PUD, so conditional uses do not need separate conditional use approval. Associate Planner Brian Robertson, referred to herein as Staff, has reviewed the plans submitted on September 18, 2003 and has the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements 10 Zoning District Required Proposed �( Min. Lot Size 3 acres 20.2 acres Max. Density not applicable not applicable Max. Building Coverage 25% 2.7% Max. Overall Coverage 40% 19.8% Min. Front Setback 50 ft. 50 ft. Min. Side Setback 35 ft. 280 ft. Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. 200 ft. Max. Building Height 35 ft. 24 ft. zoning compliance SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. CITY OF SOUTH BURLM N 3 I DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\sketch The entire meadowland Business Park has an approved water allocation, which applies to this proposed project. 1. The South Burlington Water Department should review the plans prior to preliminary plat approval. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The subdivision received a 30,345 gallon per day sewer allocation. This allocation is still in effect. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. 2 The applicant should submit a grading and erosion control plan for the subject property, in accordance with Section 16.04 of the Land Development Regulations, with the preliminary plat application. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to this property is proposed via two (2) access drives off of Meadowland Drive: a 30' wide drive on the westerly side of the proposed building and a 24' wide drive on the easterly side of the proposed building. Both of these access drives are proposed for ingress and egress. The two proposed access drives are at least 400' apart, which is compliance with Section 15.12(E) of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to Section 15.12(E), the easterly access drive should be aligned with Bowdoin Street, on the opposite side of Meadowland Drive. 3. The plans should be revised to show the easterly access drive on the property aligned with Bowdoin Street, on the opposite side of Meadowland Drive, prior to preliminary plat submittal. The proposed parking lots are very large to accommodate the large trucks this site will cater to. Therefore, circulation on the site should not be an issue. According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 61h Edition, 24,540 square feet of warehousing and distribution will generate 12.52 P.M. peak -hour trip ends. However, the square footage of the office portion of the building needs to be submitted to accurately calculate the traffic impacts of the proposed project. 4. The square footage of the office portion of the building should be submitted with the preliminary plat application to accurately calculate the traffic impacts of the proposed project. No Text CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\sketch The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The subject property does not contain any identified wildlife habitat. However, the site does contain a pond and some wetlands. The wetlands are delineated on the plans dated August 26, 2003, but they appear to be delineated by the Chiitenden County Regional Planning Commission. The proposed building and parking area are outside of the associated 50' buffer, as shown on the plans. However, the City's Wetland Map shows the wetland extending beyond the wetland depicted on the plans. The plans should be revised to have a wetlands professional delineate the wetlands on the property. 5. The plans should be revised to have a wetland professional delineate the wetlands on the property, prior to preliminary plat submittal. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. According to Section 6.04(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Industrial -Open Space 10 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and Burlington International Airport. The l0 District regulations and standards are intended to allow high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open character of the district, minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and enhance the visual quality of approaches to the City while providing suitable locations for employment and business growth. The location and architectural design of buildings in a manner that preserves these qualities is strongly encouraged. Staff feels the proposed project is in compliance with the stated purpose of the 10 District, as outlined in the Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. There are significant portions of open space running along the western, eastern, and southern portions of the property, so staff feels this requirement is met. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The Fire Chief will have to review the proposed project prior to preliminary plat approval. 6. The Fire Chief should review the proposed project prior to preliminary plat approval. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINt JN 5 ' DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\sketch Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the westerly side of the proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian and recreation traffic through the property. 7. Pursuant to Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant should submit a landscape plan and landscape budget prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer, with the preliminary plat application. 8. The City Engineer should review the stormwater facilities and utilities plans, prior to preliminary approval. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The subdivision plans for the entire Meadowland Business Park show details on utilities, lighting, and stormwater management. These have been approved by the City Engineer, so they are acceptable for the proposed project. 9. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any new electric, telephone, outdoor lighting, and cable distribution systems shall be underground. The applicant submitted a lighting point by point plan for the proposed project, which staff feels meets the requirements in Appendices A.9 and A.10 of the Land Development Regulations. In addition, the applicant submitted exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the proposed lighting. The proposed lighting fixtures are in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. 10. The plans should be revised to indicate the exact location and height of all proposed exterior lighting, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat application. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations, any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: CITY OF SOUTH BURLW- JN 6 1 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\sketch The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. 11. The applicant should include architectural details of the proposed project with the preliminary plat application. Staff feels the site is planned to provide for adequate planting. However, a landscaping plan should be included with the preliminary plat application. The site includes a 20' wide pedestrian easement that will help facilitate pedestrian movement. In addition, there is an existing recreation path running along Meadowland Drive. Therefore, staff does not feel any additional sidewalks are necessary on the property. According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(13) of the Land Development Regulations, 24,540 square feet of building dedicated to warehousing, processing storage, and distribution requires a minimum of 13 parking spaces. However, the square footage of the office portion of the building needs to be submitted to accurately calculate the required parking for the proposed project. The plans show a total of 80 parking spaces, 2 of which are handicapped. According to Table 13-7 of the Land Development Regulations, a property with 76 to 100 parking spaces requires 4 handicapped - accessible parking spaces. 12. The square footage of the office portion of the building should be submitted with the preliminary plat application to accurately calculate the required parking for the proposed project. 13. The plans should be revised to depict a total of four (4) handicapped parking spaces, prior to preliminary plat submittal. The layout of the proposed parking areas meets the requirements in Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations with regard to parking spaces dimensions. However, the aisle width between the rows of parking spaces does not meet the 24' requirement outlined in Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. 14. The plans should be revised to show at least a 24' aisle width in the parking areas on the northeast and northwest section of the property, prior to preliminary plat submittal. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is proposed in the parking lot to the west of the proposed building. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. Parking is proposed on the sides of the proposed building, thus this requirement is met. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. I i CITY OF SOUTH BURLINv / ON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\sketch The scale of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site and existing buildings in the area. The height of the proposed buildings is 24', which is under the 35' or 40' height maximum for the City. 15. The applicant should submit an elevation plan that shows the height of the proposed building from average pre -construction grade and indicates whether the building will have a flat roof or pitched roof with the preliminary plat application. As the proposed project is located in a business park in a area where industrial uses exists, staff feels the scale of the proposed building is compatible with existing buildings in the area. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Staff has already noted that the utility lines must be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. No information on architectural elements is provided. 16. The applicant should submit architectural details with the preliminary plat application. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. Again, details of architectural elements need to be provided with the final plat plan. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the followi specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The proposed project is nestled between the wetlands on the site. In order to provide any access to adjacent properties, wetland encroachments would be necessary. Because the project is in a large lot, industrial area, staff does not feel access to adjacent properties is necessary. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. I CITY OF SOUTH BURLING , uN 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING WrMsuMand air express\,sketch Staff has already indicated that utility lines must be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). 17. The plans should be revised to clearly depict the location and screening of any proposed dumpster or other facilities to handle solid waste, prior to preliminary plat plan submittal. Landscaping and Screening Requirements Staff has already noted that the applicant should submit a landscape plan and landscape budget pursuant to Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area with twenty (20) of more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. At least one (1) major deciduous shade tree, whose caliper is equal to or greater than two and one-half (2.5) inches when measures six (6) inches above ground at the time of planting, shall be provided within each parking area for every three thousand (3,000) square feet of paved area or every ten (10) parking spaces, whichever is greater. 18. The plans should be revised to show 10% of the internal parking area landscaped in accordance to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, prior to preliminary plat submittal. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. 19. The plans should be revised to show the proposed location of snow storage areas in accordance to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, prior to preliminary plat submittal. 20. Pursuant to Section 13.06(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any utility cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board. 21. The City Arborist should review the plans prior to preliminary approval. View Protection Zone 22. The preliminary plat application should include information on the height of the proposed building in relation to mean sea level. I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINL , ON 9 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\land air express\sketch Other The City Engineer has reviewed and approved the plans (comments attached). His comments will be required on the revised plans prior to final plat approval. Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments Section" of this document and include the changes in the preliminary plat application. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Bill Spencer, applicant CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS LAND AIR EXPRESS HEADQUARETERS Swift Street Extension — Meadowland Drive 11/10/03 1. Sketch plan prepared by Krebs & Lansing dated August 26, 2003 is acceptable. No Text CITY OF SOUTH BT-TIRLINGTON DEPARTP.IMN7 OF PLAMINDI1G & ZOiTU'TG 575 DOR,SET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTOI , IiERVlONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (302) 846-4101 Permit APPLICATION POR SUBDIVITSION SKETCH PLAN VIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Summer Ice Joint Venture c/o Mark Neagley Neagley 4 Chase Construction 1 1 SO Airport Parkway Ro Burlington VT 05403—(p) 802 658 6330—(fax4 802 658034 ?) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and. page #) Vol 387 Pages 439 - 441 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and lax #) Land Ai r FxnrPcc of New England, —Lid. 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST 11,T TIM PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) option 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Bill Spencer same as #3 above 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1150 Hinesburg Rd Lot 3 Meadowland Business Park Smith Rurlinaton Varwont 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office)— 0860-01150 Lo 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use). current vacant land b) Proposed Uses ;on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Corporate. Headquarters of Land Air Express of New England, Ltd. c) Total building square footage on propert7.i (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Proposed one story building of 24,540 sf total (see attached sketch plan prepared by Krebs and Lansing) 1) Proposed height o oul ding (if applicable) Proposed building height 24 ft (see attached sketch plan prepared by Krebs and Lansing) e) i Tum er of resigentiai units (if applicable, ilvv units and existing units to remain) NA 1'} Other (list any :other information pertinent to this application not spe'Mcally requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Proposed facility will include offices, cross -docking facility and maintenance shop elements. Office use will occupy greater than 159o' 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Euilding: Existing NA % Proposed 2.7 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing NA % Proposed 19. s °ib c) Front yard {along each street) Existing NA % Proposed 8 % ? 0) TYPE OF =STII\TG OR PROPOSED EINTCUMBRAINTCES ON PROPERTY (easements. covenants, leases, _rights of,uay, etc.) Existing 20 ft pedestrian easement and existing 200 ft space buffer along south line. See attached subdivision piapiat SPI prepared by Trudell Consulting Engg�ineers 11) PE.Ol'fED E TSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MU1,UCIPAL FACTLITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) Proposed connection to municipal services and --readway eur_�ent-iy in place on swift st Fxtension 12) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & l/iATLaTG ADDRESSES (this may be provided on a separate attached she r see attic P� Sheet 1.3) EST�VIATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATu Six months from obtaining all necessary permits 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is free. SEP-17-2003 14:35 NEAGLEY&CHASE CONSTR 8026580349 P.02i02 be.ebv ccrtrfv that all the inicrmation requested as part of this application has been submitted and iS accuate :o the best of my knowled e. -, SIGNATLU& OF APPLICANT _ SIGNATURE OF PR X OWNER � ti .Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBI ESSICNI- I have revie-wed this aketch plan application and find it to be: Cvr�plete ❑ IncoMPI e is ° 4 Dire., o of Tlannjng & Zoning or Designer ate TOTAL P . 2., TOTAL P.02 09/17/03 WED 02:17 [TX/RX NO 76021 Z 002 .�:.T= PLAN The 'LHcwin2 information must be shown on the Mans. -'lease submit five (5) copies and one reducwd copy (11 " , 17") of the plan. Failure to provide -the foilowina information _kill result in Tour application being rejected and a delay in the rejiiew before the Develoument Review Board. If submitting a plat amendment, please submit only pertinent inforination. Pease provide {on separate sheet) a list of ail abutters to the project property and mailing addresses. o Name and address of owner of record and applicant. o Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. Numerical and graphical scale, date last revised, and north arrow. D Location snap showing relation of proposed subdivision -to adjacent property and surrounding area. o Boundaries and area of ail contibaous ;and belonging to the owner of record. Boundaries and area of the proposed subdivision. E:,isting and proposed layout of property lines. Type and location of e<.isting and proposed restrictions on land (easements, covenants, etc.). Location, laineS ,mid 7Nidths <,3- eiSting 13d proposed 3 set5 or orivate ways. E isting zoning boundaries. [� 9 ',i xisLing watercourses, ivetiands, floodplains, '•akof�oie'�ed areas, ledge 'outcrovsi, and other nataral features. * Location and size of any e,nsting seviers (ix"�ci1lding septic tanks) and _voter rilaflnS, culverts and drains on the property to be subdivided. o Number and location of parking spaces (see Section 26.25 of the Zoning Regulations). o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard. o A list of --,vaivers desired (if any). o all applicable information required for a site plan application shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a cornmercial or industrial complex, muit-i-fannily project, planned unit development, or planned residential development (please see site plan application). Permit Number APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month . That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Type of application check one: ( ) Appeal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation) **Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( ) Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY) WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING? 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Summer Ice Joint Venture c/o Mark Neagley, Neagley and Chase Construction 1150 Airport Pkwy South Burlington, VT 05403 802-658-6320 fax 802-658-0349 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) vol. 387 page 439-441 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Land- Air Express of New England, Ltd. c/o Bill Spencer 115 Covington Lane. Shelburne. VT 05482 802-863-5062 x 219 fax 802-863-8062 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Bill Spencer same as above. 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1150 Hinesburg Rd, Lot #30 Meadowlands Business Park, South Burlington. Vermont 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0860-01150 Lot #3 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) currently -open, vacant land b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Corporate Headquarters for Land Air Express of New England, Ltd. _ c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Pronged building of 24, 540 s £ total d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Proposed building is one story with a height of 24 ft. (see attached plan prepared by Krebs and Lansing) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) NA f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) Total of 50 employees: 30 office / 20 non -office g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing NA % Proposed 2, 7 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing NA % Proposed 19.8 c) Front yard (along each street) Existing NA % Proposed 8 % (does not apply to residential uses) 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ 1,000,000.00 b) Landscaping: $ 30,000.00 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 290 Total (see traffic study attached)* c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 20: 7 entering, 13 exiting.. 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: PM 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday - Friday regular business days 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 6 months from obtaining permits 14) LIST ABUTTERS ( List names and addresses of all abutting property owners on a separate sheet of paper). 3 Application For The Development Review Board Request for a conditional use Applicant: Land Air Express of New England, Ltd. Item 14) List of property owners abutting Lot #3 Meadowlands Business Park, 1150 Hinesburg Rd. South Burlington obtained from City of South Burlington Assessors Office 09/04/03: To the south: Dubois, Homer and Marie 1405 Hinesburg Rd South Burlington, Vermont 05403 To the east: Green Acres Inc PO Box 2123 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 To the west: Summer Ice Joint Venture And northwest c/o Mark Neagley And north Neagley Chase Construction (Lots 2, 7, 10, 12) 1150 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 To the north: Thomas Chase c/o Neagley, Chase Construction 1150 Airport Prkwy South Burlington, Vermont 05403 EXHIBIT A PLAN The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (1 I" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. If submitting a final plat amendment, please submit only pertinent information. Please provide (on separate sheet) a list of all abutters to the project property and mailing addresses. oI"Complete survey of property by a licensed land surveyor drawn to scale (20 ft. is preferred). o,**" Name, license number, seal, and contact number of licensed land surveyor & date prepared. of Survey data (acreage, property lines, zoning boundaries, watercourse, base flood elevation, etc.) Location of easements, public lands, r.o.w.s, sidewalks, and public or private street (w/names) a,"' Five foot contours (existing and finished) Location and size of any existing sewers (including septic tanks) and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdivided. o"'Location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks, and other public opens spaces. ei Numerical and graphical scale, date last revised, and north arrow. ;/Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative water supply. V" Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes. QZDetails of storm water facilities in the form of a drainage plan. o Details of all proposed bridges or culverts. o Location of temporary markers. &' All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and associated conditions. o A list of waivers desired (if any). o Development timetable (including number of phases and start and completion dates). 60t A report addressing planned residential/unit development criteria of the Zoning Regulations. o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size). car" Location of abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping ar- Number and location of parking spaces ( see Section 26.25 of the Zoning Regulations) sr,' Number and location of handicapped spaces (see Section 26.253(a) of the Zoning Regulations) Qe Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard G/Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be downcasting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) o/ Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations 'If restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE Fee $85.00* * Includes $10.00 recording fee 5 SEP-08-2003 13:39 NEAGLEY&CHASE CONSTR 8026580349 P.02i02 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE UP PROPFjMJOWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW ALJTHORITY_ 0 Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zonino I have reviewed this site Plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee 4 Date TnTQI P Gt7 TOTAL P.02 09/08/03 HON 01:21 [TX/RX NO 73141 Z 002 �tr-ems-ebb 5 12: 02 NEAGLEY&CHASE CONSTR 8026580349 P.02i02 MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK Permits � _ ✓ Act 250 Permit #4C1005 - ✓ City of South Burlington Subdivision Approval (1996) ✓ Conditional Use Permit #EJ96-0381 ✓ State Subdivision Permit EC-4-2004 ✓ Public Water System Permit #E-0629 ✓ Stormwater Discharge Permit #1269 0 ✓ Amended Air Pollution Control Permit #AP-90-052C (replaces #AP-90-052B) ✓ Army Corps of Engineers Permit #200102616 (replaces #199603166) ✓ Permit 1272 ✓ Archaeology Letter from Emily Wadhams, State of Vermont TOTAL P.02 09/07/03 SUN 23:45 (TX/RX NO 73051 1a002 Notes: 1. 7hls Ls not a bg dwy su }r p pMy /Mm hasp ore frwn a pMn enbt/ed Af dow/onds Ptak -by OW Eng.—g As ktes. 2 Abufth g ppgrty Ih,- me lrrvn 01, of South BurtMgton 7px Mgas (M digital lion). .i Oigfto/ —la photography and —t— data — *_ v ant MoppMg prow= photography data fnm Spring, 1999 Location_ Man_ Owner Information: SLmmx Ice ✓olnt Ventura 82 Church Street 8urlinglon, VT o5401, (807)-"-8142 Applicant Information: Zaniog;_ IndustnW and Open Space Zoning Vbiriit fiend -- LU .- . ApproxanaN H'operfy LMa ftfts W U W 0' 40' 80' 160, 140' 310' 400' Bar Scale 1" = 80, .aneed ae:a �ar`r. ._ IC in Sketch Plan n JAR 1. = 80'--- Meadow/ands Park August 16. 1003 ,o' ct OYJJ? Swift Street Extmslm-Hihesburg RO South Rur1/rrgta, Vermont A"' PS & I.rih'SINC Consulting .61normeers, lnc. . . 16-K Alain Slree4 t olchester, lrermosat AWS Notes: M., h not a bound y sur X Prgoady Ih,. shorn are rrwn a p/ -&4d M-d-I de Pork -by aW En0earer9 Aesocmtex Abut"" property Ih,- are from CRY or 5 th Bathrgton lax M ps (h di9Rd roan) ftfiat -W photography and contour dot. ore warn V art MppIg P ogram. Photography dotes ham ,$ring, 199.9 - ----- it Location_ Map__ Owner_ Information: Summer /ce JOIN Venture 82 Church Street 8un1ngton4 VJ o54o1, (802)-658-8142 Applicant lnformotion._ Slimmer /ce ✓olnt Venture 82 Church Street Burlington, Vr 05401, (802)-658-8142 Zany lndustr/a/ and Open Space Zon/ng O/strict Areas• Buildable Area = 4.27 acres Total area of Lot 3 - 20.2 acres _Prgoosed Lot,Coygr�e__ New Buildings 24,540 s, f. 14,541 ,a = 2 7$ 81,1112 ,r New Porkmg dRoods -� ors ales ,r. ' 771X Totes/ L'ororage n1RsiY nt -- 19.8$ fiend - Approxrmote Property Lk,. 0' 40. 80• 160, 240' .J20' 400' Bar Scale t = Bo Dote rewsed jChecked oats Design /AJ _ Drawn JAR_ Sketch Pior) Checked -- ---- Corporate Headquarters Scale I- � 80_ Date A_TH LC M4 Land Air Project OJ>32 Sw/ft Street Extens/on-Hinesburg RO South Burlington, Vermont ARAWS & L4YVFI1V6! Consulting Rngineers, le4t Aain Street, Colchester, Vermont ............................... -r sw Mognolk' Ndfn iN•d vales oB /he illuminance o�\ provided by tha new lighting, in / * \ font -candles, as calculated by 1 \ ALADAN, a G'E Lighting / \ Appl/cation Design and Analysis 1 -_... Muddy Brook �I rvvls 1vw cwwa �,�... �».w. r � h./..L,f\.J. A.I�.l�l+l I 'I II 1 0.49 n' I ' �le•c I I II 1 0.49 1 II aa^ as aa'a If l 111 a aaawaa II I 1 II I D a ♦` a s I1 I 1 1 II 1 al � , m atgP I I I _ II O-61 1 I Ily�l 1 Existing IS' bike-' I I �. FT a I Pnlh easement (� I vv ai u v a .. � Boxed w/ues ur'e the nDerage ) I I a AA-,J Y1 J ' v _ _ a• w - the !/w rinoted aneo. Aanroga rl i 1 a%b'Y✓ °o/( a" a a� °' 'at 7! - '71mmfnotion feref for lighted area 9.F tea• @ Iv ae is D,6 foot-candle.. 5 f r fo / a W 4 a a. a'W a• e, _ s/c� III II / of I I I 1N . ae � J �l• 1 I f / / / / Existing 15'bike / path easement / r '/ mxe ui 1 15� �teomu /' �'°*,*\� �i 1 ,l /// it �/•� ' �\,cm�l � S LN,l �. .:. w•'� � � '' ,.� ...• � Mudd - to ' 130 Le end 1 r*F A fW Nbeghfn250 ClL ff Lu hi,&e, 100- H meld hrM'de, We# mmmred el IS: / J / 7YFE'tl 0' Nbughtm zw aVf Lamawwq 75-m tt meta hd/do, wolf mounted of 12: ME c 6r S7'M-175 Lu hmk cutoff aplkx w/M 75-waft a_— 20 �- _ _ _ �• —_— __ 120--_�len_____1Lla BCC SCC/e meld MIA* Pde-mounted at fe: V * N. 7200 c �OISTF.N�'a \2� sp�� EN�e FOR PERMIT REVIEW WALLIGNTER296CUMFFL4111 A1RE � vaoDucr Ouildimp l y.,dlate. edeno-encad, welkwdy Veidenlinl yeta, lAing tl°nNa anmany d mhflr wAll muunled Alm Ilghbep Applications. I1115711iemdSLUTASLElORWETLOCATIONS CSACmtih,d IbreeDieee din can elmmmnm Aouxinp PmwmeA Inviee•Momw Al rkM F IiMfh EntIDDM.gukared. wAh - a d I r.n.eme erdFm evl b I saae.teenda y Flmn A Mhmw lb I dA.p, A Uencea Aieewimbed F meetAaFmDe rrenbtttlem beOeAt cemyanena wane Im1e1Fe MDglll ee medium beu 1•mpe TYPES A & 8 SPM-175 LUMINAIRE mr„xenw,rn walEw,�s Parl rg arnea - _ I weM II. w+1lrpMine w+M Mr r, - - M1. •� wall muu A - elan - - SPMM wnk Met tllea • N115721nee SUnaflrE lUx WET I0C0.I�ONS I i • C.G Graeae •Arerd eomxwebnel • E u d end ceeiwed " •N• ndw a tr•eluentdnrp»•d lle Vnes r-' Fm Feraeerel I •INeuSnTnADarynwAonamarnryeaD»n.rc El. deponae • Nimweury eF-can emmr ran nroi �q •!».apm».x Fpn rN egdlanwr.. °,a.r weE -. •IlN one aeyv Aeea epeAn lnD lea yl . WxAI 1wMMeeep un GDra.,esemwmwroi eEa em enlwn 1M.IRTnmlde°o lam •s'r�DDxe •..wnnFe wrm madam bn»l.mD I � . me •exam e°�:m TYPE C May d 2001 added owrogs foot-cand'e neM IMte nN.+ed Oasriat/nn Cheaeed A - els 71' \ L w 218.01' ' -5880, , EXISTING 30' WIDE DRIVE EASEMENT- \ AND 10' SNOW STORAGE EASEMENTS MATCH WTO EVS77NG EASEMENT LOCATIO (BOIN SIDES) AND /- /` m 14 34,34, 10' EIEC. EASEMENT i R 789.78' FOR SIGN U6T4TIN0 L w 200.92' TIE --� z •\ ..D- 11 ETEI ICAI tI \ EASEMENT ro SYWI R w 412.18' \a L w 50.08' _ _...., DETAIL yy N O A 405.87' I.1", 83'0TJ2'W CJ ..\ Yx zI �' C 20' SEWER EASEMENT, M VOL 203 P. 472 -.--! NO3ti2'JB"E 587.03' C1 NEseu73e_ _UbE DATA CURVE DATA �g$EM�NTSHART BOWDOIN LANE 60' R- W I 2.). 19 355..i J44 fit 'T 17 77 7500 JOG Of 136.3E 5N5]V ] J3719 286.151 .1777t 5727TY)J9H4'5S1"17I i !f 540.15 337.04 JJ} 67' '65 19 99 S 5a1 .4 11224 112.04 SU909'JI FW. !97'J1/1!" 08" 460.15 141.SD' 140.94 55W155-If GI ,10'01'16" 460 IS 241424' .38.48 38010.5'J3E AI L-9165' [I N 0'56"A"W A7 ARC�II977' •)S.n1Y A.7 PkCW 51 (id' R. 75,00 AI ARf,+if9.71' R.�75.OrY 7 A5 IS91.6!, B-• MAT7'U6"E A6 L^IAJ 29 R_ N1M-to Ww APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUT71 BURLINGTON, VT. ON THE - DAY OF .-. 198`-, t\\ SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS Of SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED INIS __ DAY OF ___ 799- A BY CHAIRMAN OR CLERK \ G SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. \ 'VnfttA 7E � RECEIVED FOR RECORD 19 ._-_.. �n Ot ._._-._._ O'clock mkrutae m PROJECT LOCATION - If recorded M VCWme_____ Page _ < Atteret: _._.C", Clerk ion r`. I A'I-• - hIROUC.H LOT 6, 1 II PROPOSED 5 1SE 1__... PTO 97RIAN EASEMENT TO 9F. COMBINED WITH 7L7LISTINC EASEMENT ,i ..'�.' `'•9+._..•'"""u I---EXISTING 15' WIDE Q71-DE-SAC PETAII PEDES71,1IAN AlEASEMENT Viol, 176 P. 510 rz P1mnA ru -IR r. w LAeeue rs KL W. L5Fu n11 ran VOL. 211 P. 170 QUARRY rr smcr 1 IW nr ON I X, U{.-ILD 11l nM Nr Ad Klan n S Mf t L. JDINl N IIMf KR. AR AO[ )a OF rnt d atWWII, Ou I`D4 AND R(CMAS AHD 0.1 IOU ill rN A. op 5 1. RF6 •+�'r"` _ 1 nk5 nN rL R sfn M A rn IAL STAW 1MR[L4 r 4RSt ;AUENCF I(XM A IN fI U) AND IN LYINAl10N AR RACno fRw J.29 Ac. 1O Nt 1 Sw -LNGON 1-0 R(COI[D . J.88 553.42' 1 m u RC o ru ON Nf A:RM( f rx)DRnMnn vsieN on OB 50 l m 31s » 1yJ sID I_$ Au 1- 2s. m mw Al w TM A, Xrsr anl•. N 8302 EY p N AI FM'I NAS MIN aX T0 rn1N1L`R (aLNX fC iASENtN 'b 1$ O J.OB Ae. N N Ik n .1PrWUII,I rA-n NDnnA. oANr MWS AUn-AIKn nk t100 N1 �� S 0230'E '� _,$ 3H• c` 1 fNCW u IN4 v r r AW NJ ". ON s P Al ROAD VARTNERSFRP -' F, lfy N83 (8 )J90 Ac. n, 556• i VOL 271, P. 3e2 HINESBURG ROAD 711.56 Jg" E I^ rrWE Rl ar =rso c ]oN. s SIInRrI n rlveu anew nurNaRw ,NORTH SCENIC NEW �' i orkre"a fA .- N 83'02' N Q B� PROWDlo u rrR UI nnkr (w lr ram( NCR AMY .p n ra uMNN '^ S 83•02J8 'W » M (RN rav f M rr sr; (n wmACNr (v INC Cp L6 LB PROIF.ChON ZONE- INN 1` q. 3.I3 Ac. 5 N el IN -L7 u �O y, rt 3,9H AC- b' �U O SU W NA M(a Y n INl' qr Kf AN L I R A oNr IACII CIAN(RR 16 AMA w 1 dL -� '60.OD' 1 IM)N PRY 4 C t r W A 10 l ' w IJG WlWkll NLADS. 716.5, • R UE L C rM W INf SM1 u( a -11 NWM4 L t4i1 216.00• / C.22 Ao. I'S .L N 84.5;S'19 :�"' S H4r�J-- i9' W t ACRES INS_ ^1RFr el fl[NlF ioN IM'15. i 83.49' W ^L A�A1 BO O1' r d k S. -../ „ / EXTENSION 13 1.31 Vol. 9Q P. I2a , INL ft rl$ Ur- Ar' IOR S I1 SMCEI FYR 5)IrN rI MAT': ON 80' MIX ROAD '- 0. 0' NVL. 213. P. me amft ANr ( M I AR( r C NW r(n m nIE cln n' j"„ _ _ N84'SJ'19"E '' ufnnIII nriwm 1111, nil" sr -DD car w mL suenWurD VOL 91, P.49 I 1 .00' _ --' '- R.O.W. TO BE,CONVEVED TO C+ L15 1 i N83'49' E CITY DF SO. BURLWO1t7N I CS y 1 AREA : 5.Of ACRES 30, Wes.__, X IN. N1N _10D 1n^..I RE+rlcrau Au lots IS II - In -IONO IOIIMl0. aw NE HkxN1cl 200 OPEN O or ouu fi nNrs nr mslnncr FNw k' c sr :atr rrXx n SPACE DUFFER 1 ti DRAINAGE ` POND '0'1 rn rrw r n I A rn N[rcR1 rs nlunno, G• - - _ 20.20 Ac. EASEMENT A� i r1 1 4 ROO .---- --..« U '-ZOO' OPEN NM f1- I((.' -.I sl Of aNYt I, - oRM:.'!,u RIGHT-OF-WAY 49.50 AC. O 1 _.-_. _ ��- PEDE20' MOE STR AN L�'ACC BUFFER._ io sao AaiW.i.4.a! S. 5rim iirrArlrx �c �N.n (66.0') •J� f00' WIDE 2O' WIDE ' 8.00 Ac. I / oS" i CONSERVATION ZONE 20' WI DE •h EASEMENTS-- Ll'! EASEMENT-. 1y 200' CONSERVATION¢ �} h ZONE AND DRAINAGECLNQ Q I i 20' PEDESTRIAN �. dD EASEMENT /� " cc 4401J'_ I _!'ALGLkA rtO MYNI' (SFf' M. rAll) EASEMENT a .- - ;R.�•�' f0 2. • uIw Pu rXnvu " r. _- --s63"Ia9s w � s62•a3'1e" I1 _ _ 11 I j .. 6 W a 'r fr ) J 4 7 g' 9 YT_-- 563'1_ 4 � U - uXXv wc !ro nr ..[ D _..-_ _ CFDAR 1REE ! - I' !fwcafrc NI Nf Ir (nxu+ry UO • I - too' CIX45ERVA TION ZONE 70' PEDESTRIAN rn+I:Rta NDNuw r (rn IX Vr) -I-.. t P. T k N. -_ 30' WIDE SEWER E EASEMENT -._-- l1 lA•I DAM !RAPE RI fFRI, N!T .. ... _- .. - DANS DRAINAGE EASEMENT CON J OWNER, SUMMER C'S CLA9K DAM CNAN1 wxtNrN " P VOL215 S. Al R. E i 1. P' '� L. A G ...._... PENNING 209 ON � `711ER pF NRPOR7 APPROCN MMER ICE JOINT VENTURE . A . - "W BBe11NdRQ SOU LY ED(E - FXIsiRm rMLC IM( OL I NU:SYJ 2p V! JMq. p�O'tl L7 NSJ'Ul'J6'E 1467' L1 ,,. 057'W 100.00 L4 S8JT!136"W 19.f2 18 fN.}'JP 16 F 20.00 16 N62'2059 L 194.1/ 17 N0774 J4"W 12,00 I.A N8J'04 4G"E 747.00 19 507V425-F 110 ti13'1909�W 1.17 S83'272"W 112 '.0,5'16 IJ L L 1.3 S84',5J'19-W 1.14 50;i 58.17"F P67,65 1.15 7184v3-19 C 116 ::AA';�.f'19-W 117 S8J19 M•W ItA N8JVI IG"C L 19 84 J 19 W L20 NF01607'F 65 ITt !; r0 9701 87.65 1.7I N8J U2 JB"E r(ISlI N/I' -BUffi1d1(jON PROPFRDES LIMITED PARTNJ,BjLJj� VOL 273. P. M PLAT MIL JK P. 5 Il PROPOSED RELOCATION OF 50' EASEMENT TO LANE PRESS REFER TO VOL. 219, P. 102 Ir --- 80' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY CONVEYED TO THE CITY Q OF SOUTH BUR1.INGTOM VOL. 384 P. 104 l A 60' WIDE ROAD ._._.�\ R.O.W. TO BE CONVFYFD TO CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON AREA : 0.98 ACRES 1 \L4 L2 -L22 N83*236"F. �j89.07' - ML - 4 589. 7' t �2 s P I J.12 Ac. P 4.47 Ae. TAP 400 DO' 60'X100' EXISTING PUMP STATION PARCEL VOL 176 P. 510 - VOL 211 P. 187 1.5 20' WIDE SEWER EASCMENT TO EXIS77NG PUMP STATION • VOL 170 P. 510 211 P. 107 !I� ' EA-aEAIETIT fdf aA-oE-SAC j ORCLFIrTO TO BE EO BACK T(} LOTS tl AND 0 O LON Af4O B eNFN 4A LONGER OLIL-017 SEF AND 'CUL-OE-S4C OEM 2ASSVCF � ffAP SPECFIC OlNEN9dlA own GO' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE G.,"YFD TO THE CITY OF SOUTFI SURLINGTON AREA : 1.01 ACRES----� !h 50' WOE DRAINAGE -T / EASEMENT �L. I I -• If VOL 211 414,77• 0I5 N MUTANT _.R._PJ.QO� M. R K. A 2ex Prolxt title VOL. JR7 P. ' VOL.112 P. VOL 60 P. 131 P. I4 - J P. 070 VCL. 179, P. 126 PLAT 1OL_ 107. P. 42 \\\ }N111Nn1Ik194nrYy1 Vf • 4, MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK 20' PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT R�OF Hinesburg Road So. Buriln ton, Vt. LEDG I LDcanoN TO CENTER ON -F...tS11Lt11 DEVELOPEMENT y D .t. 3 RECRF,ADON PATH ALONG TAYLOP .THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY Sill division Mat. Qaphk Scale /J FCo1 (!� XOIIUINC/I'UNr RCNSIrXJc A/7 )/95 SLN `� a'atAMakl^� 7r TRUDELL CC)N-AULTING - -300 0 300 600 9p0 1200 ReWbnA �- I Date By ENGINEERS, INC. a olAlr 1,1N ron4 eo, .rw wmr,)^n, vermnm 111495 879-ant Rr0k9t number 5a8022-40 Lxt __00 A01eet RMr. RPT DrevmT _ f1e1d L1eek I051i 52. Obk 1091 TRUDELL CONSULTING , ENGINEERS, INC. 14 Nair Park Rood Bex.308 WIIBstOn, Vt.,.. 05405. '(802) 879-Ei Ll.l _o 0 N Z � LU T/J „ co C) U bate B Revisions PVMVNRI:-a ro opar .,. f1+. 5E or VER NPv P, 9\M,O,LJ . ., ,'�1• Bq s�1 `R' 1OWL E, Protect title MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, Vt. Sheet title Subdivision Plat 1'ro;ect number _..._�u2�-I4 .. Approved< .1✓s�f� '... TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, ii°Ir 14 Plhlr Park Road Rnx 308 Wtlllston, Yt 05495. (nW) 879.8, PRP SrAr1Wl PARCfI Ott — CONSERVATION Rc OPEN SPACE DISTRICT a CONSERVATION OPEN SPACE DISTRICT I •Y/" "L i \'i.S�q I!M�MMfR Project Location NIT NIT QQL?U Nli 11>N Y..3Q+:OKUFS_. I �!/ If. _..1.iM1.10-WitkRiKL_ A �y�' yT,y L?91!'!LF/1.Y)1.F,5 t _ r !/: ® ca V�1 P `��' �`\/`e �rf,%%/������•`='�... ^6so o O T 46.6 AC. r � O I T 1 �- INDU-TRIAL AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Up 7 / SOUTH FAS7 UADRANT yA '• S/ 1. ' S7R ^roW' !it I �'`� \Pt pa\ n' wno[ w w I—CP 4�VlP\—rufeNeAwNm-CmGS.-_�..—_a Date ICT wIFT PevhlonapISTR N/Fn.....- as9a ��wu.i5ruwleitA CONsr RVATION AND - '`�f' / b„ / 1 '`. ; ,..... \ ~} ~ CJ OPEN SPACE O]ANO - ` `.l'".',r"�•�. '' F`", x / , r lot, !/ AC ICT T rx � N SION / SaJTH BURLINGTON r / >' 1 r.�, y4 . / �., P s. ._....-......._ TOWN LINE: `\ WILLI NdI6 1 — I QUADRANT yV �' sOUTHEAST �� - ;m ye" N/r RN/F DISTRICT FI 00n _ ILTANJ. NIT LiG/l>dA@C, I LOLf or AtRra+r nrPBgCn.sAI'L --" - l - 1,- 11 N'F 1 INDUSTRIAL E CONSERVATION EN SPACE DISTRICT Prn�t title / �`xj /t y� i " •lit 1 , ` 190 EACH 5(nE OP CENIERLfNE (!F pR00N�' ADV .a 6ril NAJ' x soUTHEAST BUSINESS PARK QUADRANT 1 DISTRIC Hinesburg a �,tt LEGEND nRoa d .oad SO. Burlington, 'Vt. �cecs�E ea�an�ecal�w.nrc�A�EAS � ' ,� I... SUMMER ICE JOINT VF.NIURE y -----' ",Illy / I.OI LINE D 8.1 ACRES — -- � � - 82 CHURCHSTREr:T BURLINGTON,- VT, 05401 sit ryge TUNING UIS rRICr g(HINOARY I_J ;� 23,2 ACRES N E riMaster , WEII.ANOS (NW!) 4 I6.7 ACRES .. • N/r " - N`') HEA IN IN INAREA DUSTRIAL k �j Site Plan IJ 26.4 ACRES .TLftHEHl.. 1 OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 1167. ACRES k V i — --,J — _--- ORIME AGRICUL1URAL AREA 84.5 ACRF$ ... N/F ,� %// CONSERVATION LONE Prolect manafter _ _ al r ___ Drawn s�,N v4n, Date _�_ eji,/as=..-�- Scale Graphle Scale - .. APprov®d'-,..y��bf�TtwL.•�:%� -n — - reef , ' 900 0 300�' 600 SEOD 1200 ,,�.�.r'_....✓ .. E�•.� '�+y� S p L N ,``D ! I �\ CON x;1L I . ' . , f ,. � -_`}` '�'y.; '• 1 ':.. "; rcs. 4 PI<It Pert R 's I � ,':. I "�,r.`- ..• ' . ,No-r''"t`..` .";,.,i 1 >.tR �•. M t Vt: 09A4: !Lq 1 Rr ! ��. r LANE F'REss ; �j '' . • :.-_.,,,� � = �-'�'-,,�..�`�r �V v�,,,.,;�r'•t�,�� , Iy sw4+r Y 5 rffrer rx lira watt j w fV IAr 6 oN.4 A . �✓` t . 1' .,\ `. 1 1 rl \ z' %W wow �iJ 1�' aaf%Nu tAg-wvvr W w64 RR;ftl-X -"Y I \ r ON Lots s wt s, ;,.; � ' .. _..._.PaMotED :praw N;tnr- �A?erFNr •--,:M±- I -1�;- ti ?x r 1. .S 5D' rnuc 1 •f d .fir I !I _ ': • \ a1 nor a i f \ 1 I : I, HO NeGF -. _ ... • � I _....:.:.......k ': ;' u e .\ ,, Pv:i9 i �•__ - __' 1 %/''✓� 6'As. 10 �I J 4 .,,) 1 Ci Lk. 1 f QP.:Q RCN. ` rr ZOOM,: WET r��r+c+w,rd—(W.9rii liv 9frDA F•:1 E / 1 FOR Lotr / AN \ \ 1 ). rA•c em+a/, //r asfL,ie�r+iN" Cr1N8FAVp II N 'NO {7p1}+d. r r •..•ar'r " r"" fi sPAr,{ b,smY�f r�EYLnYrEe oN + PptmaSFA CNANNF! ✓ 1 "'.1 / r _— y ) 1 \r� \ t ly ,. , ,/ q, ,1', h i. ,yy . ,. : , r,!�. :,r,•_r,.� Y. !:,,z.,,r >.v^r ,x ... . .,.;. ..� , , ;. .. .. ,✓` i( .. , .,! ' , .: <.. ... .+.. r' 1 p p '::I'1 L1 CAVIL , , ,.' : ry. .r >r•:'�r�' ..�! ::: �" w'rv. .., ,. .,�. ,. ., f.ur. ,. '. ,. ., w : .:: :: :. .i/' ...�f7 fi:L#3'�H�� qg py p,7 y . y� _,:"'" .. . �.._ ,.n.: W a +{ a5 °fi orA9virR► B BUSINESS > N' 9 CLd �r r A ML NGYON. i,r ns+,l pg �o NJr PEht+ldSi ' aw. Nvnnav ANo ofin v r Semler ,*G [ACN .QM n����OPfx•SpAtti Df q'N ifiTIArC ai$MMIC '! '} 7.:.T,7 y y h _ dalorYw v4 1DD' eIVC' - PMWIND fiNl�JOtlr ':.: - _ t _ :, N,' r4 • •. ':..,. . N f 0,w A8[ LASEMFNi .-..rirPCAU „-.._ r6u�.i � fDr.F A` MIMpl N OAyH tGvC ' : .-..u•- ..«�... _..._ __,.. :.._ fir-- �.. � .�....: --_ 3 *^� r t Rer�P Fc SP3A MW r q}l\f ,�jt t ilS* 1') ! Y N'FTi AN7 #:ELPtfd'+'YION , 'J• F�yr� r� �i t'? f }�+� "°` NiIYC:r • � ...'.+'�^"L"'"' f I�.. .1 . � r :44/ CiFr',$CBtittpfPAHY+k�' I.M.}PROFYt1T0 M Wirefm64Y S_ • t(1�S1 kC: � Yra ., hurrah••, P���s � �L, REChEhiK7M•!'A1N5 WiLI..NGNr DE OON TP('C7EU • CAr2n M3N ' � I� HtTh'Rl:NE�657Plp1�.'&.pSEME.NTg�AY THE f)EuttUP�G+t -: ..n......... exret,Y'r'oA ?F+E:brcvSor W& W`lTmw IWsvo!r 14/ 1Nn l r•m:EY ET1FNSION'AiQH%6r'-1.wh. NA'i(r1:M.tlar _ 1 PLANNIN?3 hl4 TA . YOrAI AREA : 116j7 AOWS 411 .. .... _ - Fc,�t. jDrN5+FY ALLD i1 tyN1YRVAVpr aN{Y^rgspr sPRCr /Asmz.! �D : H noes i. L.or ., .....�.:. ... .....:.1 MIN. 3 AgPE LOY . Ln0 O Ap ' n00 60c5:80O _ _ Nua.96R OP YpiE .ALLOYll'p : - 1�.H LOr;. - .,� NM7PEP. OF LOPS PPOPCISW :: .11 C079 t r ti / F ,r 1( . YI' \ � t vPR p+n47ynl+r'MT YPbb?, ut6 IW, Il9 INX (iaP 1,4 « j Igx,au's�an rLtapc;� r n. 1v» nu a;, r ,u r i rlwr tr+rn a' r,�rs {.., :... nrwF �er°er 1 n Iu e ticnkrtAk+tg?raai� to nhati Ipr Y.:rtJte.Cx r?tF1 .-»• _...� f 11 � `\4 � a fYYOi� M+fL^��r$Yrf SrwYtiAr�.V,d r � c A65 t INMO S / - IrN71 b{TV @gjlr� A Irljll G: ji ~ � 099 3.f... I Jrx Sr 11� �. � �3AMta""j1N7 qpr� ��a� - vaT it G<rr i��t, It 1 \\ cGT�pC,tiCR gorl�rr LL`E ISM r l�:` litr �nr' a tra n wta e%kn g /> 107 �r ht� `, _ _...�„„� ....,,,,! .. j ✓r S` rodrtt�7>rMPAL'�afc >� r --FVrSI IAM Ill W ll— —1Ci T I,Vpylel[n MR �ry &r�P$ pp YNZ;l,Nd'l" nww+�''!'t'All'I � _W �..:✓ ;,... ,� .o-.rry,p : � i fo aul�,cb-n ._ � _ . , i .......;✓ • ....,..---�-� ^""`"'"_.""' ;` BU92JNi.rNr tk +rrm n r tnr _.._..� »..r__ � -'' - b *ETf l sMJPA r nrAt an$8 jt al�'flMd''rM r � F� clAsm III Irf n I; I • •r _ M!1rRG f r 1 S -S p A r � ,t>>ta 'Will .. I - P,,,fvt , title 4 : si�r�rr�Nc nnrlt _ I At3E ADC-)VVR..A P4I<b 1 3 US!N! Ir'AR K I I Corr a a'x'rrrXdtf� , * y Ott 2Q0� 0 tool r-b �CfPJA amm�i tav� pwwcnn, y_p�r 2 Ip arm ,a � v;rw r nr{re �T . ' f-IXMaC17E2 Clime.. 4 / NV .1:9.5 . • ..t FVIiF,PhLH-. � RDADWAY'- rPLAM17'. 'tJa 0 1 f;5 \\ /'• NYR1WA1P1n-. : 1 •, i T !J � �. , ��24 �a4'1��• R ,A ..v P hC� u»EV MN#u " A1,A / (M! NO! t'ORM nrV✓IWy `+""l � ~ "".� I � • 'IFQENp - �•.+•++i.nM..+++ w41ER WAAIN "-•+•*"•D�---•� SRM M WATER MAW C3 CON RE1P MONUM&Nt .�.r.�,....rr PROPER rY I.WI tWOLFCA w 11 cmm --'-'DETC • YELF"M.M AND CAD(.F ---! UNDEN(Y+CMJM F.11CMK _...___ P --•-• O'4%1EAV POWER -^-- 7---- - VMF.RCROUM TELEP!IONL GAS I a POAO r 1/NOFHORAIN J21117 m 3517C' 60M _-M5 �. // / t.}b) N1 / 6n'..2tl' RCF11 1 Ap-.:u,..l...-.r „_..., ' 1-J:u�° \�y J 5 -. C\..I1%1- u u ; • __1.,. �n". n . �,4.'�.'?}'{�,�M. . _c _.. -,i, .. y\-`µ_N'A 1 �• tb._A✓v' g',} p �- / / •\ .:,.na,M '•1. I ✓ � � ...1.>(.-,��.-oy _1. � -_u-,: ! n � .FP..0 1 N 4NT_.. 0 -E 5F wm ATtR 1vNa n8 �. 1 %rt {_HYOPANt MARSIMII•S SEEDj''NS ASH a-10-VAt H� ® . , 'A tEF I••3 30 .• . BURY F.lEV.»Jaf.3 ff ' v \ ! �r / r 10n]6 CD1/2t ..._--__Y WAiFR M3JO Rn . � �\ r ru3JI.70 I BI1HY EL.,•SM.T 00 ONICFP/R'R 691M I-A}N,jjS \ \ + Z. R�f' y__40 .33; 1 .10 _ SRM1M I.J}1 f0 \"..� �` ... SL MER y7JI..5B 1' -.... ... SrW46. Y 30' 1.}IEROEIJCY , WAR .1.. .1 bvr32.00 I •.--..- T,'RE B CBp22 CMP I1 uIv . 33 10 SS �CA)JJ.a .S WORIM 1..)J f,Jn I *u} JMMI PLANt } r. (. W311.tE H.O.W \�._. _.. i 2 TYPICAL ',' / NA ITR/SBM'FR .. '�x>'� ] n?0R 11 ')hICPE58fn /'. 9E W'IR MM,/r} 9-n^ VM.MS 1 k 12.00 �.... 11 I /. 31J.D.S r•.N0./S FNO SCC nRN.S 1 1 (/��`�\ vR' R I'Drp21 ( •1 / .% "C .... S10Ry/--J.tB.OU J33.e5 ,;' tl' !-JJ2.aG 1 } YROP05ED S1 I0 N1 �IAN S,J fi=33).SO ._. WAAP.,t54M ,'tDMM F0N0 0URE7 `, 1•• J3.JC a \-� I %/A MY JiPA �` 'V / SBwEN )+J.11.00 rrib B 11,020 ` 1-,.ADb ��t nEPE< .,,y , W,y� r!•ry y�}yp { ,.Jn i ._ ._ --' A5mlim 1-mz 2 � ' i / t.-A7 Kri HR01F. IM15 .... 1 IG17M (.,Vn. :' I ' �fA`.'E4F....-..�..0 ...... ...........,.... -..--_ qqss 41, /```��� Arc ��/ A'T ,•. MTAMP'Ef1V :M^E 2 j / I rK �i is nslGNs® J / I I r IY1 EADO LAAYi./ } PrOJPct numDe YbOdlO,IA E 1 UUf EXISRMB POND BUSINESS PARK PruJPrl Ingf _ RFT 01Nw . MAM_ .� - 2'lDESTRAN J - EtLX-?MOk ' BUSINESS ,pP RPI i GPADF G. T I S De l y' _ ChRc", d TV:1 - !y/p3 � ..70. Burlington, VT y 1 1 INS A(I. 4NC PCP N$. R15 011RIN(: GPADF I I I 11 lOW FIOW fONDIRFMJS CLW 1Ar`i 9{/ I* 1 I) C OFG411BR , ,Ne 1 YtRW. •-____�... K .�,y�--�- x ..- I �'. 1 fMMfIP /O OBSFR YT WviN.l ARCW 9 � I $HCeI CIUe ��'}�t Street Extension ?•r {yj r wf KR.uominM.mrc 0 r NM.1 KAM W„ SJi A Road Profile 22+00 To 33+00- //r;// RP'ARIp9 [keGrbNa - u W �' TRUUELL CONSULTING ENGiNEER& INC. Dots e- �^ -•_-� ] 14 Filoir PR,M Rnod enK )OR WBIIFtM, V9,mo,•I 05445 D/A-5.1t1 P 3 al+i iJn]. '3 '.. 2.3N 11-34 .141.6J , _la Y.nB All 112,39 Ja'<Rn S4,I.e1 J a,'.r .T 1 I � RW I'A .: 27A75 - w R '_ ! PW nA - 3+?.no - - .. (� - J} .• r. 1 ._ i r,1 �7{ _ PM rLFV « J4f O0 ,R _ NN S{ 9, A.O. ., 2 3e p' _ .. t�.00 Ael.93 - ... w §: A_Y.2 W �M �' $y - .. - "�^ -: 94Q tt "' r(. r. ,. -.m T�.. 'I. __ L _ Ci R �::^¢ - 41" ` "^-..._ ..--...._,,,,_,_, : .. •..... P 'co 6 , R y G =' 342 eW •4six^{�'=N�`1' , ... ((_-..•.�... •,�.._ Fn ,,: 4.,.1 f ti.c .. I. :, '_- -. (MV J40.1. 3}0 ^ F 1 YW _ �.� 1 I-r in s7'^ - .-R-.._- �-•--1 111 i PCR A _-...;1 �..X1E• C 1, 1'IPC Nrn 8� P� 2'i1f)NI/• _... Ssn.DOB 2. ------------- �-•...."„e:.1. �:14 I nro iJ..._. .. :. ... ... .. _ - .. - _ 1 r , t .W. P vt , I. ,. •,:.,.,.w. 6r,IC 'x H.fJ. .r ui I' rr � .--�.•�-. tl PS1+,J.., BPVi. D.1. aASs 62 wA CE NANL ry 1. _ .. .. '..: CONCAI TE ENCASEMENT 20' LONE' u, •I .. , R I �+ .. i CCNRRED ON PIPE ARCN 1 wr I n i is+oo ?s+rm 21+60 -3�b6 ._ � ;w+bti' _ _ 37�co 20+06 -_•. lasso Jo40o ai+Oo 32+00 1�4+00 9 \ WATER 9L4w"; 1 1 WICAP A DmUS1 BI.OfX,I.,TJO J0 - N^TL: E`ou SCRNCF f01' TAT It LC n7 M1, 5" :1E'f EINf.'fi FI .fA Da�CBIFB +'yJJe.DD I JJ2.W 1 I EP11111E cL � •+ sno.Eroa T + 220.82 L '}jS.BO / TI '\ STp1M Ri. \ �RENCH1 -��7 � epI WA iFR 1=JJtl 30 I N IL I srxEa m:uaao \ �- 1 ` + T- a0 _ I, V •.# ROR S f•v. -pv- r 1 a'""brT W VAIYt ' • 1 Ly T , CLASS M Wt 1LANR BI1111R ROUHDANY - f RVARDN AM URN CF DISRtryCI RI[ ECfCoWCI:G, TEI. FPHOIIE, AMC CAS LAYOUT AM; THEIR COW i, IJC1!ON - - OETAEr SHOW ON TINS F•I.AN ARE CONCEPTUAL VIE ("At LAYOUT %.AN, CONSIRWTION VE7A9,S AND SPELIFlCA P3118 MCL BE T'RFF'ARfn OY DIE' .. _. ti ' ` 1 Al'PRORRmm Uml CONRANK THE CCMIRACF D.5TKfN We UnLITY AM CLAS5 N Mf RAM MONN(N1RY ' 50' WTVAM PAyrtzr { `\ �.-._.- .._._{ AME) VA%OVS TARS RED G iT NJAIAIt AI ".MRR� 9CA"OU rolS \\\\ PROV:CIION AltEA I ANY SU1:FI U%.17Y ON PL 9 IS SUOXCI CHANf.'. AND WHE FMAL (/)ti %AN:i Of THE (M11UTY COMPANY M1lL GOKRN fOR SICWMWA ICI "M )Y ORNANR SEC Slkii P7 1 I I {/��•j / . I " '.I CMP CM SE �MN i J WA TER/57MtM I I � II �1{ I / �':✓ // y� , 2 WC1 FENCC .g 1330.pC�1YPKAl $R1PM i.+,IJ0. 2U I"4 A I a TCMER SF'RNCF, _-SCMR SfUFA1 A+CAP.MS.6A S,UAkVr .I 12 1 WATER 1='SJO.OD 1 1 I ! r- INN J:1 .7 j 5Y(acM I.+ a.15 I RAS`. TWALE' '/ '{J \' SCR£R/SIORM r I 1 ! �'/r Simi-J3 I 5.10•3,12,2tr R Y -.,� STEMLWWATER PONp � /4 / -06 j i dd..' I . .17ER wATER/Jnt Mf- -- . , J r,� l ' l•.` / ` 4a n1 }M tEa '.' DO V , o_ I. IJ`YL a[WER/S l FORM._. / %AER/Wmr. nEBEk i-332.90', ,��f;'�Y1f:f E�It ENO SfC ION ;` I / `�// � vCRA: RE If ENO �! I AT f.AP.., 17.R(��� SFN[N I•!1).1A 41 SiclaM;-3,1].T5, �� 1-SL.SC \�`"'^ Ircm, 4-335.f0 WARR I..Si. xa ..../.' ; d. W �r n EON _.`S^44,f l''z_--'T'F w•^'^_`-.-�'a'. (i_^'_^-I'r�-RTft.YT7J wn n'R_ A Fm ' _. C: OW(i\gtY022 g60221RSA 6-17-b7 1::50'. 24 pm Ea ot'74G s+9My/ aw tit5rwWMZ->30NF6'. '. � - t0+'f7Rik:1!t)k 'J�fiAi$,A40 srtitfkntrr�Iqp��i g"� �v iMP .. �`� I r�—• ` nrorgrR!aft IrtY.lr* tx1uP/Nv »rt �jNiRAG; Ni+ N!t UrUrt nxS *.� nl[ pfThtx'M rrit ��uMdn !1a tr. M?man!tt ` I .___ ,- AM1A vARn.N/! regcs. Rtl;a»xL ra r� r�4{'R r,M+ w ��. '' - ANY SVrN U11L tf». 1.yfC p+ V I5 �vs,e:Cr,� rilE' nN.n, PE a.O or me MI.,'caup•nNr Rv.� r.6+,nrH •:,, y • "•, '. �.._. , , ___:_. i., ,' .; ,, ,....------._-__._ . ..: ��^—""".'"� .•'.., ._.. l Y 00,(Z.- I,.-"7""""••F 34400 -- ,75� UO l70 I'm:YF £+In CURTNfi nrm A Nr cllr n+ '~�"' (1 q \ -_ _ ,..•-_ `' „ T ! , �•••..' CA iqN H 3htlS Sf.G EYA)N.)A( 1' 1 l M i u - t / 4. - and u r�s rx Re.we+w W�crpftp+n , ,. -'. _. '. .:., -+•r ,M��`.ke wr .'w mat c: � � I �'i � 4 ; q�A - .r i 5 eM5»NC I P '7 7 t I I 1 n I 6�t'iif["..: .. _,', � .._-_ter"' � r,.•' ( ."' j', ! 1 1 I .i.X' -w a ( I - m Yri hr I 1 x �A4 Vl 454M •� t } I r<A f•Y D'h..F r£ry A. A1'M It BUSINESS PARK Swift Street Extension oad Profile 33400 To 40+50 'RUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEER � INC, A^a� ! n Rlab Ij _ I _ i T _ 1 I t 60 41 r I ' SQCr -i -_ _ __ _ r•"I�-t--w _ _ - r -5. k— { i v• �A. r� ti - - _� _� _�.. ...ter_. .5.,:_. ...:w. �r.,i ...._ : _.._ - __•__ _,_. - no -•••-..3 WAY HYOPANi, AWWA C-'iO7 LL -7 NOFAIE,FfyEPANr )JODY FCR PR(MFR,AtICNMENT 1� -•EIVRY LIRE ELEVA FI(w. MARK j1� • rJNISeKO WADE --. RL,IDINO VALVE WX AND 1.10 II".'jil,lkul[,I�jti,1411��1P��Jfli. -Owl. , .._ MA EE x/s r„Y WUSNED VOTE BELOW DRAIN PORT j- TNNUST btO CLASS D CONCrfl2 LJ 90 0 FT OrARFNC AREA AWKA GAIT VALLT. C-SOD - "LW, ANCHOR' 9. r, F fAASt O CMCWCIE N.MIMMUM 11$T 4fS,AN$ R7'ANCHfM VAIW i C T'R'1 r n M,I. I E _..-.:. / SWj pz JO NT HYDRANT IF C AWWA C OF ,+ p USF IA Mm Pot TFNYEr E BETW 1,H ALL rI M-2 AND CONWCTf. Iu DRAIN IF BELOW- f -�. •-�.. I M.t ~� DO NUI COVER WAIN � I r ' WA IFR FARE PORE WI H f,ONGA•EFF t ...__- ...._4_ iHAI15I DLOCK CLASS D CONCRETE t. IV $(1 Fr NEAHING AREA II� I I �- I �Ib� 'IrE .II' % _Ij I _:',1 ) I I=-1'li .jf l�• SIDWL AJ)N, HYDRA., LMNEC II(Xr (If 5M"cl, Ar1Ni CONNECTOR 1S FACTU:;I,D. NIEN ADD 311• ROD ANO LUfS) f`f%PROTECTION HYDRANT Co"PACM TO RECORD L"LCVA it- W" PIPE INWRI NARK LOCATION VAI.K AND - II CND CAP WIN A fi4 fo'OHT TO i 1, OF CCA IA t"' A ]NI GROUPAINTED r THE SURFAC.0 AND PAIN20 BLtif."I - VALVC' LOCA It(' AS 5110WN ON PUCE. 1xd OIREf. tLY ON CAP PROFILE PLnN5 I L Ifil , -ill i I T I ill. I r T I sr 1(IIN6 VAL W A:IA I j A11N Flo ILL I� l l 1.1 llll B' MINIMOM ti llv..i. ,�Trll r rAP NTPf ti MECHANIC At JOINTS A.-GAFL .� AL VE C-, l - WAIIR MAIN 1 CUNNCCII(.w W. IOxIO.N 1 LI,I tII { _ FXILM SERVICE TO 10' I f RE OR fo,e CRooSR A9 INp1CA TEO F LSE ✓OND' PROPERLY LINE , I 1 .L LII� �. :. • :.,.I It II' r .POC £D,YLLNC. ;L.�I�'.:I , I I I r f 4 - CLASS D f,ONLRE'R THRUST VALW ANCHOR 5 C.F, \ CIAS'S D CONWEIE THFUSI � BLOCK, IRO KF. INARING AREA (YANS 0 CONCRETE' WIM BLOCH. 18.0 Sr, REARING AREA R K DAHS AHOUM VALVE FOR TEE AAACHED P) CONCRETE , Q TYPICAL WATER SERVICE CONNECTION TXA• _ L,L,.. ni - - r --iMS011, SFFD, Mn MULCH, OnRFNI FDA SE11LF„MENT _ " yL yLQ1yVyL11N1GWiAYWNRLMMJdyyAWWI f rip --FIN OR SI/AGRADE xr' + ( - tV 1 orA-OAMprops AACKFILI. RI U iPIE OF DE SO I, FILL RFEE 1)R F CC HO7EN $0 IL FILL U Bk' flM1F'AC.IF.D(N'fp' IIFR A �jll n 'a r wnrTR _ � r)I+ILANI 1AXLI1 71 TCNI WE `•-11 �..I�L--'.11 iTl '-�II 7 TYPICAL WATER TRENCH - WAiEk En Sf IN CDVIK' gIA1�- •... FIFFISTFED GRAD I'ri 9I M1'i 'r, . it Ilr ;I -..__S, An G VALVE 90X NM IID - 2 QF•f t INC NIJT 5' MINIMUM - RMN COUNTER ct"WISE 10 (TREY CAM VALVE AWWA CA IF VAL WC-500 j -- WENA IC"', J)INr CONNECI'A. 111 - AMIL POI YF' MWENr DETNECN VALW' AND CONCRET VAL If;ANCfKNI - 3 OF CLASS b f,ONC'RE 2, B tl DARS POUND VALEANACHED TO C(1NWEFtNO - II IN1 70VO SkClfKAIILWS FOR SPECIFIC MAIAACiURLRt -eTYPICAL GATE VALVE �--__-___.__ Ji1-. f`oi 01,01112221 DA' FILL. COMPACT AND PATCH EAMUNC RUADW'AY A' VIRECIED V IIIE FNGINCER I INISOF.0 GRADE AWp - 11NN I: VALVE ROA ANU 1111 SNIT SLEW EYOF LAPPING, SLCEVE 001.tEO OVFF' Cx1STTNG WATER MAIN -- It' WATER (7Nr' -t MITE bEFMFEN I _ AM) C001 17 VALVE ANO CCILtNE. ' VALVE MCHM 9 GE CLASS U CONCRETE rl .1' W'IN LE d BARS AIFAfMO t0 GOHCRCTE r ..vF A LEI tS D CONCRETE NRUSI BLIX,W 14 SF. BEARING AREA ON UNU154)"lo FRENCH WALL TYPICAL TAPPING VALVE g A. ML10R IU FILING PUT INTO SERVICE, WAFER MAINS SHALL OE Dl'7NECCTED ACCORDING TO AN,YA w.C1- FICAIION C-65r, B. ME NEW LINE SHALL BE FLUSHED AT A VETOCIFY OF NOT LESS THAN 2..5 FCEY PER SFCUN, (UPON 2-1/2 INCH HYDRANT ! IME-CTZAVA FLASH FOR A PCRICYI DETFRMINCD RY ME CHGINEER FOR THE Nr' MAIN DISINFECTED. LENG A MA U RE D15I FC ED C. CHI EANNAi1- .SHALL RT M.Cf MTY 1RN.0 AYINIRLKRFCING A H)PHCHI PE IE 'iOLUTILM' WIN A CONC1H PAFION OF 90 PARTS E'ER MILLION OF AVAUARLE LYA.MINL. D. USING A NOZZIL: AT EACH CNO NYMANT, CONTROL BIT RATE OF FLOW INIO ME NEW MAIN AND PROPORTIONANY FEED PE NYFLY +LORIh' &OLLTTON INTO THE AM. AFIEN IF LYAMINE NRS R[ACHED ALL POINTS IN PIE SYSTEM, CLOSE PEE VALVE SUPPLYING WAv..R FROI Mr AISTING MAIN AND THE F,ND HYDRANTS. MAINTAIN /HE HF.ANLY CHLORINATED WARE IN THE MAIN FOR 24. HOURS DURING FIRM' TIME ALL MAIN LINE VALVES SNOULO Elf OPMAIM AFTER 24 HOURS PIE MINIMUM CHFORINE •RE'31DUAL MUST RE AL LEAST .10 PARTS PiLft MILLION. '. f SH HEAVILY CH 1 A NATER FROM OOILM N AL P M E LINE M AND REF L1. THE LINE FOR V TAKE AN f LI SEA ICE KC b AN' UN A UA AGILITY. rNAl ISM E CF NE RA7CEMP !0 PIE SIAIE AI-D -li T. 1 FA pC5Y Fit ARE OBIA115FACRXtY, THE 0IS7Nf EC IJON RROCF.RVRE WILL Tk'RI PEAIEP -lit SA tF$FACTMY HESUL. F.a Art4 oetalNEP. �DISINFECTION OF_WATER MAINS _ - IA'All ) JN rU ni nlf .) J EMT -I rr Ff •-�11�� . _ �y •-•WM1�ER MAIN (APNAW M f1ELDW SEWER IINrJ i I 1N• NMI LM tFJ'A n11ON JUMrED PIPE• EENTER la 11 RuLL,A 'T, WA )EA PIPE CN SFNEA PIRE'LC 71 ANY OTHE^ WAFER I ME ii AHNr TO RE 10' MEN. FROM SEWER PTPF SI'W2'R MAN t'II iIt ,II }lj[ .11.i WATER / SEWER CROSSING Jfd'=1'D -- �a. USE CL AS,S D (2500 PSI) CONFRETE I'1IN NPU.SI PLOL'KS, PLACE A NIL. IA(AYENYLCNE IArNEEN FITTING AND TNPUSI III,- PLACL INRUST - BLOCK AQA)N31NMISTURREL) FRENCH WALL CONCRETT: BfARfNG AREA CW I'ITIING', TO BE A MINIMUM N')/2 $BUARE FOOT TI"Osy BLOCKS BASED ON 200 P51 WORKIW-, PRLSSjFN PLUS SURE ALLOWANCE OF IM PSI. •� iL4 L _ ";' -1 1}I-1 11 I , 1 ) ! 1" 90 ELBOW 90' TEE 22Y ELBOW 49 LE W E O D113CTIOLIOR i 0M, Ay ,�. J I. - �:. .... •-.... .. FXR"ND 0. INTO ._.._. _ ,.__ _.. CAP W/ ML f. H. AIIIIF MCNM WALL RBNbkm 1 i +d07E` FNR PEDUr,FRS, PROVIUL 11 P !t nt991F ( )J by J. 9EM7NG AREA FOR ME U--�.Y - . -.-INENCN WAIL. IVPlCAI: TlT•CBA$EO ON RtlWPOUNDS - FOR EACH 2 1" RCDUCUON ) UNDISTURBED 9INL. IN t17E. .. .._..��._u.-v__.... -.- _. __.. _...•:: TYPICAL [AP REDUCER THRUST BLOCI( TABLE N1B1NUAl-flE9B11EG BIiCd.1H.}OIIME_LEEL_OY.VMD13_iURBEO_DfCNCy._WALL Ar h 0• 8 O a $O71 3 C SEARING I)PE LOAD I.BS/FTI Uf _. - T!Y 90' AS'T22 S 90' AD' 2T.3' ifI PU A3' 2T 3 r Y �9U' 3 22 P'V pU' 129_ I tI' CLAY d.0 LBO 23.0 11.0 T.0 98.0 .0 T1.0 10.9J9. '3.9.0 .f0.0 1 0 CL 1p003.0 2U d,0 l0 10.3 'I5. BO JB 0 3r p a 54ND 20W 2.3 U 1.0 3..$ 7.3 A.0 a.0 9.0 IJ.O l.0 JS 11.0 iR.O 100 3,0 SDP97.9 DRAWL .IOW 2O '10 J.3 .9.0 JO T5 B:U9QSILT20M 1.1 09 TO d,d TO t0 05R: SIIALf r(KKKI 10.5 OS L.D I.r IU US 2.O T5 1.7 A itl J.0 J5 TU D r 61� MAIN THRUST BLOCKS -^ N.L$ TFSfra; WA TEA MAINS A. AFIM THE PITY: HAS RE" LA10 AND 2 DAYS WMP THE CONCRETE THRUS) FLOCKS AND ANCHORS HAW BEEN PLACED. THE WATER MAIN SHALE. RE HYDROSIADCAUY IE'STEO ACCORONG TO AWWA .SI CCIFICA7IM C-GW. 8. rONTR CTW SHALL SVPPL� ALL NFCIS R AF-PARAW FD PTRICRM RE NYORIXi1ATEC TEST C, IT ST PHE35URC SHALL OF. p.OQ PQVNOS, PtR SOUARF (N'Ir .L)f+ I %j TIMLS !HL Wt)I+KING PRESSURE MEASURED AT M NEAR INE HIGH POINT Fei INl. S). TM. tM40itiik 1� GREATER TEST SHALL Of A 4INJMUM OP 9 HOOPS IN WRA!ION AM ME TEST P4ESSURF SNAIL Wf VANY MORE THAN 5 151 FOR ILK DURAIION OF THE TEST - D. 'HE PROJECT ENGINEER AND THE MUNICIPALITY SHALL BE CONTACTED 48 HOURS PRIOR TO TESIMO. ALL VAL WS SHOULD RE WRIFTI'D A G OPEN• R CLOSED A AFW PNIAP' FOR E 1 E 3 PEON 0 $ Po O Pit PW 1M OF THE Wq TER MAIN BE JOG TESTED. . AILO ATir.F LEAKAGE SHALT. NT COMPUTED BY [Fit fORMULA: 0.(5'.x 0 x P)/IJ).200 WNc RF Q 1.S c LEAKAGE IN G'AtIONS PER HOUR. $ IS THE. LENf,)H Of PIPE TENTED IN FEET, 0 IS iHF NOMINAL DIAMETER Of THE OWC IN INCITES AND P 15 MC SQUARE BODY OF THE AVFNACE TEST PPESSURE 'IN POUNDS L•Lp SQUARE INCLI DURTNI THE TEST G REPLACE. AND RETEST ANY N9RK FOUNO TOOFDEFECTIVE TES TINE NYrIpAN 75' .. . A. AFTER E 11NO it E WATFN MAINS (.WlN FRPRPRHYDRANT FULLY AND F1LI WfM WAI.R, TO PREVENT CAPS FRM REM" IADWN OF, WNT NA OM ONE Of FitCAPS-NUKEIT f9 MEMO rRLED, .MIEN ALI ME AIR HAS, E'CAFIO.-77GNtFN ME CAP. , 8.. ALLOW tHE PNF95VRE F0 OUII.O NP )D MAIN LINE PRESSURE AND CHECK-FV LEAKAGE AT FLANRCS, ;NU21lL. AND IIR' MIPATHFG .SEEM C. CLUSF THE.Nyb9ANi, RI'MOM ONC-NOZ2tE CAP ANQ PLACE THE JPALM OF YOUR NAM OIQYE THE rsr.NrNc. URALNACE.S"O"L" CREATE A. NOROEAI E SUCTION . TESTING WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS d,. , y - ------ �"' Vf "' Y :5:'' •� + `1111111 frIAMF k , III 1AKi i la)t7. iS ENAL[ Rr'il"IED )I. Ill. _`l _. LCD-SCWEA" ,-. SOU, I' So it .HARD OR)(X SO .• OR . R SS PVC' '� .. r, _ •"' \' : BRICK ANU MOk IAR U 511NG IpNPI(S ' ? PHOV10C S1XOOM: s M 11�r 4' tt I `• MINIMUM IWD r.(KTRSLS, MAXEMUM I: INCITES TRANSITIONS RLi+k:T. INVERTS OK Mil'psll'; .' f""."CENTRIC CONICAL TOP SECTION 3 tF OLPNI t# MA1110i RIM 10 CEHiItL{NE IkVIR I til OLE..' 1 THEN A 11 Yr7 11a BL INS lAfLEU,: ip DErnl f6 F'APCF,T F,'x TERIOH dOINT9 WITH - Y IELT Ot MORE,, PwN .I. - - '`y HYONAOLTO LL`NE•Nr A CONICAL -ICP wILI Pr- 1N5)AELEO. ! n.; 1 "+ „__, BUM BURNER SEMI �. 9F" !)fA I � --GYN17 EN7IAF. oursWe wj R, P1lA, r :._...WELDED WINE FABRIC (5 X 6 YMf) I •I' ,I ..._...LADDER RLRJGS O 17' O.C. USE MANHOLE STUBS FOR ALL PIPES.' DMICX AND MORTAR ,00m..D INVER r. I, I SLOPE TOP ?' TD INVERT r4 BAR$. R' OC., BOM "IS f?" BANK PUN DeAM BASE OR Al REBUIRE'D BY CNOINEER IF WE AND IM I)N$rABI.E (i •. Uk 1V �-Lb /1�Q �.. 11' ," cONUIIION$ MST. •:_i711 11 +n1 IIII :rlil� SEWER MANHOLE TYPICAL ' "CHTRA1191 IU RECORD CLEVA110. DF PIPE THAR)AT CAP 'MARX END of SETIVICE WI R( A 70'2r4 PROUQHT TO SURFACE AND MARkED VR IN RED NAINE. FLAU BOTTOM O' 2X4 DIRECTI.V DN TOP OF CAP. ......_ ». GAP (10' RE YONO PROPERTY JNr) OR AS11JDIPAMD _ .. -. 45. RENDIt 11 111 •IIII lI1 _ 8 ME III SEEs/TE MAN .'. r+Dw QLAN. V EN' 4 7 B' 'Efth' MAIN IB SLWEN SErRVI f,E ......... .._. ._. _._, PROPERTY UNF _.. Oil ... A t t PER 10:)1 S (NDICA IEV dt ASCNO - TEE I "'-8" SEMJI MAIN I11 II;Tt�(I,}�u 1UL I'�.� I,, 1 Ilf kILYNJId.I•YJLW 11 4 SER VICE CONNECTION Fit, MURQFH MANNC4.E su r,W. /N1-An' 1" �• 'S1'41NLESS STEEL CLAMP J' MIN rMOV - ..P.__.A..- NDIPAEFD (MJ PtAll AS IPt HAr1I,OLE V.SI MANFi 1 E STUB c ru e I. NI s. - jiF 1HERL IS NO LCARAQC INTO Tel MANHOlf AS fir IEAMINE'O i Of THE MAMAXE. HOWEVER, IF THE rNO1NEER I$ Nir TEST At PFSCRIBED FIERrJNBErant Ik EONE LiTOU A pERfUD OF ONE in Wll L BE 71J TIA11 `FBE. HEFILtlT1 TO THE'TOP or ME CiDNC CNO a RIE TEST PERIOD, Tip' MANHOLE SHAL& BE EfflU:ED It SHALL BE '(XMNVEP IED TO A 24 NOUR RATE AND THE. SHAU NOT EXCEED ONE GALC(Ax PER I"nCAL FOOT IECNV BY DK. LNOINLETE TO BRING THE'LEARACE BITHIN. F, VACUUM TEST tHE 001, TRAC Fz* S11AIt funomI MF MAMI(Rr CONE SK4, VAG<IUM PµMP, ALL NEVESSARY.O UGCS, HOSES. AND EQUIPMENT TO PERFORM 'M( I'll, C FILL ALL LIFUNV HOLCy Aff FXrERfOR MIAs WIM Al4`ROVED NO4-SWUN P W ITAR AND KM ALL 0--n OPE.YINCS INTO THE MANHOLE. TO PREVENT DISPLACEMENT. . - .il, INSTALL AN INELAfARYE RUBBER RfNC' Mr Sf]C'OF )Ht LOP OFT44F MAM4MEJI IM7AitNr THE RING WITH AIR. 11)A PRESSURE ADECIIAM TO PRE PENT LEAKAGE OF AIR BETKUN THE RING AND DIE MANHOT;P MI. 1. PUB" THE AIR OUT W THE MANHOt IHROUCH AH OPENING IN THE TEST PLATE LINT7L A VACIIUIJ ]S CPrA TED INSIDE ME MANHOLE EQUAL iD TO INCHES 01'MFRCIINY USING AN APPROVED VACUUM DAlla MEN STOP FIE•PENOW M AIR AND 14 IN lift' 1i.'ST J. THE VACUUUMM CANNOT DROP DEI Ow 9 INCFH'S OF MER(YIRY WITHIN A ? MINUTE Msir PCRI011. 7F.-MOB[['' MAN A I INCH DROP OCCURS. WITHIN Y NINU IF•S iN( MANHOLE HAS FAILEII. FIE TEST. ATJB Ii SHALL BE REPAIRFU UP Hf.LONS1R11C it ANb LIEN RETF,MIED UNTIL 11 PASSFS K. bACKFILL ANC)L&D ME MANHOIC UPON SATISFACTORY )EST RF,SUL A_ TESTING MANHOLES --OVERFRr e .NT OVERFI iTI TO AH 1,L LI Y ✓ ,t. L 11 1 ON t ROreS ABOVE I�/r✓�/r Ij .:.APPROVED BACXFJLL ll INITIAL QA:Mr/LI FREE OF DEBRIS ROOTS, SIONES. TI CLOGS OR lROZEN scu S' MINIMUM O' COVER CANND, X MAINTAIN(D USE ?' RIO10 IH;'ULATJON OVER PIPE 1 SERER MATH J/,- SIDNC ID I!#' OT PIPE eE I it 5 TYPICAL SEWER MAIN dt' r_D•• Fill, LENODI OF rill M BE - STREAM CENn'RETJ ON STREAM CROS..INO iJ r I I i : d d d d CLASS B CDNLMEIE . L lflf. I(1 ,ill a(_ 71 .Ill11 F A ONCRU E'ENCAsE T I.-TRLA _C..,. iN I I Ii1 AP _ A Ti',A"T,11F f= (A 4Y Y R 11 A PRES511111LO MR 11sl 1I W i v CON JL VE M14! Lo THE TWD ANUS GF RIE PI{ AND t.441 11 INE AT..oiCvtR01 FOUIPMI III h l !A: '9 9*ky Alp SLAM Y:TO 14 R1Pe WTI REM'lIINC A �gY51ANf Ykt: ( , INE AIN SU Phy'SO.nIAY IFIE PRFSS RPMAI PBOME J.5 PSl rr,, n rr, 3 ) .ALLOW TEMPERA TURL y>lAR1LTdAX11A+IN. C. AFTER 1TABTLI2A1tON, ADJUST PRESSURE M, 4,0 PSI AND SHUT OFF AIR :UfvPLY W SURE REACHES 11 W SEA" STOP "MI AND RECORD PEE TIME 17 TAPLS TW 71ME REQUIRLP FOR DIE PIPE ,VZt MUST PE A,T LEASE 4 INCH .J MINUTES. PER 100 FEET 8 INCH / MINUTES PER TOO FEET 8 MCI, I? I4f TES PER $Do FEET TO INCH 1 5 MIMES PER too FEET 12 INCH f 6 MINLI7C6. PER too FEE,. _ D it URRALS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TFBrm '111r AVERAGE OF Ill PIPE LENf,RI) WILL OF CALCULATED AND -MULTIPLIED RY JR? KCOvDS PCR 1 f RFAU YRED TDRF. E. IF DIMS IS nfA01}NO, W,1'r,I ABC VE INC SFWEN LINE'.)Y4E All TEST 1+h15, •(. 1.1"-.a• 'r Its !. D'i. OS's, FOR CACN r0gi Or WATER ABOVE INC THK.NT M ME PJ.^C -TEESTiNG SEWERS A �I "' .. f U APPRDYEO HACRFILL COMPACIFD IN IT' LfYT3 I i I [ft l --7F 5' IN CDVER OVER PIPE CAN NOE lA MAINTAINED USE Y 91GJD lN51ULAilON DYER RIFE. [l Ile 11: OI.M JS Ai _p •_ i ... IE, MAIN +� 1 AEJ/4 SICNE To TO' 01 PIPE , I jf •,,CC+ ,(j, jj N 1Er IN RDADWAY' COMPACTION -V LI UE M f II(il•_ — l 1... it 9SSITOR)ITY {S tANDMp PRIX: TOR). D 6 TYPICAL UNDER ROAD SEWER _TRENCH J/4"-"-Q' TO IKFr/OunrT PIPE I I I I 4 IT III \ STAINLESS STEEL CLAMPS FOOT CAST IN PLACE t-7-'N RUBBER BOOT -- - 12" CRUSHER R04 CRAVf.I. SEED AND Mt&CN SIDE SLOPES I � � P - - _ T EXTEND GRAW1 TD DRAIN DRIVE tit 11 LIOTFXVILE FABRIC 111RATI SOMI ON EQUAL ip GRAVEL SERVICE DRIVE 4. �5 �nA �t• ' P E. r, 1 ....MS . .�.'tIF'1'Au •ski „ '� vT L ,,rt?9'H TIWDELI_ CONSULTING ENGINELRS, INC. It Malt PNtk RUAd Box 308'Wlli1 ton Vt TJ34 5 R74 TTII ro DeScrlpEloD �. Lltrf 0`, RQYI�MMB' \I1AY!\7M)2I\Vfp+!-7C' � A � 1 rlol<cf Lmc MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK Hinesburg Road So. BUTlin,gton, Vt. " SI+Crf flflG Sewer Details rraj t nd b r 1 c; P hct mtl - U wn I �; Y 4 { Sc,,;ti• Ahf hrXf: 1!43 p T= '' 7r REINFORCED CONCRETF PIPP DTMFNSIONS VMY WIN PIPE SIZE O Tr r I RIP RAP LENGTH 10 FT WIDTH 5 ET. DEPTH lei. TYPICAL CONCRETE END SECTION Noll; UKWADRAIN WILL 9r, INDICATED BY TIRF CIT- OR PROBCt ENGINI-IR AS THEY OkE. AP OPRIAIE. v WS rmmp PAvrmENr FINISH 6WJNM FIRE 11 SEED AND MULCU BASE COURSE TYPE 11 C-1/2' 14' ftANR RUMURAW. L SC PLAN .11e`UN0 1-1 Am FA$PI 12' r4-'\ UNDERDRAIN UNDER CURBING --3' TOPSOIL CONCRETE CURB 'LASS 9 CONCRETE UNDISTURBED TRENCH WAIT BANK RUN GRAW., 3/1" - 1-112* WASHER HARD SIMI -WRAP TONE IN MIAAI I FILTER IABqlr " PERFORATED PVC SLOPED 10 DRAIN (SEE PLAN) S-Onoo MIN. -SLOPE rl'SOT., SEED & MULCH "'rRIIII 10 ALLOW OR FT WrILEMEWT r,�AZ 5 A OACRILL TO Of FREE OF DELBLIS ANO LARGE Slows COMPACT IN 12' LIFTS, UNDER ROADWAYS .IiIII WRAP RIOWE IN WPAII Fit TER FABRIC J11"1/y "APO SIONE ', -q�, MR CURTAIN DRAIN HIAW D071 3 FLA"Tr INLET Fqmr A, ORATE 4 NEENAH 0-34050 OR LLBIANOR UF2A8 P 7 URDIIT WAVE TO I INCIAES FROM TOP 04](K AVxs z I MINIMUM I vs MAXIMUM • I� I.CME S LADDER "4S #-12* D.C. rw SIRUCTARA4 INTEOPITY 7 I_00�T._ DIAMETER D4 —4 0 21 4 5 D6 2 m .1. 20L $4 Se a IY I 9� o4 BANS, 6" BOTH WAYS OR AS REQUIRED MAINTAIN 5_C,VNA,. IRTe M%Fll 12' (lRAVr1 TOP qU0,8ASE U. -w lQ.;Q, , Q.-Up OR AS RFQIJIRF 8f ENGINEER IF WET AND P tiNsTA&E CONDITIONS f."IST. UNDISTORKI) SOIL 2 TYPE -D- CATCH BASIN ------ p R()VTDA 24 * SO CATCH BASIN IK(T MALE AND FRAME. WENAH P-34058 OR 'LOARON LF248-; OR EQUAL. CAWI FRAMt TO RRICR ON STRUCTURE 4, RPICR ADAjSIjIr COURSES .111011. 2 COURSES .A.i.w 12 INCHES Z -USE MINI TAR ALSWID PIPES 24: MAA. DIA. IIPE TON JIB MAXDIA. PIPE pok 48:". CATCH BASIN -!A E 8'x " WELDED NBC FABRIC R AS KWIRFn TO MAINTAIN 0 ON BANS. d' D.C. WA Yv 7 �1� OR AS REWIRED TV. MAINTAIN STRUCMAI. INIEGRITY 12* BAIR RUN GR KL RAW UP AS WED III ENOW. OR ��Dj BONSEXIST UNfiSRR*1fD SOIL (2) TYPE CATCH BASIN .... ­­ SMAJ 10KR _Ur 24' 24- I.D. RFINI(R?WD COIICREIF PIPE CAST INTO SA�I- (FvPE 1� STRUCTURE) L 4 RATLO PW CURTAPEIIN DRAIN NON -SHRINK CROUT r. 900 MAE .1.1 f MONOLITHIC BASE -ORAWL .9 CURTAIN DRAIN,CLEANOUT TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS,, INC., t4 D1.11 P.1il Road B­ Y)fl W11111IOT. Vt. 05445 A70-6131 Uj ryll V. I. Ik A r ng`-%AA1J AND BUSINESS PARK Hinesburg Road MARK A 10' ' 'I,' SNOUCIII OF SERVICE m TILE SUIIIA,r AND MARK D WITH RED JITTERS S.11" WHICH "'ADS FOR , TMM DRAIN, I. I PLACF BOTTOM OF 2' X 4* DIRECTLY ON TOP Of CAP. Sh-I fill, STORM DRAINS 70 MATCH Al CROW , OF PIPE '1: nTE -0" OATCH VAW�, - Stortnwater Details M12- pm: wN 3" 12 FT, I,, CAP 10' IIFY D FR.'111 I I LINE OR AS ZNDICA M.D. PIPE SIZE AS INPICAIEP W t' N PLAN, .2, 1 lf� Ili.. III' im-T jsl - , 111 ­fjjI STORM SER VICE CONNECTION 2 S NOTE • SFCURE MAY TO PREVERI S"CRMWArER FROM PASWNG UNDERNf,ATH. IF11 HA YBALE CHECK DAM _ MINIMUM 5U CR AS SNUMN UN PLAN � •As 1 uA A •a. J1 I4, e } q-1? 'L -'Y1ot g/ Uo t �OR ru 51. 4 0 1 FI` / •'-,RALFD HAY CM STRAW ' 1•. v I' A 3 HARDWOOD SLAKES TEMPORARY DIVERSION OR EXISFINO SWAIE COVISIAUCITUN .SRFGf11f.A BONS FOR NA WAIF CNFCK DAMS li 1.) BALES SMALL BE PLACED IN A NOW WITH TNT. ENDS TIGHTLYABUTTING ADJACENT '. DALES..: TWO ROM IF REWIRED BY ENGINEER, 2.) LACY! BALE SHALL BE EMBEDDED IN TIFF. I SOIL A MIN ARUM U A INCHES .Q BALES SHALL BE SO.'CURELY ANCHORED IN PIABY SrAKES OR PINS DRIVEN THROUGH THE DIES. THE FIRST STAKE IN EACU BALE -SHALL BE ANGLED TOWARD TIE PRE- VIOU5LY LAID ONE. TO FORCE BALES TO - OTHER A.) INSPECTION SNAIL RE FRE000NT(MINIMUM (NICE A WEEK AND AFTER CVRY RAINIALI) AND REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT SMALL BE MADE PROMPTLY (WITHIN PE SAME DAY) AS NEEDED. 5.) UPON SIANLIZAMN OF THE AREA UPSPI'AM FROM THE BALES, PIE BALLS SMALL BE NI- NOVED AT IN ". APPROVAL OF RE F,NGI- NEER. CONSTRUC DON SPCCIFICAnONS FOR S(ASILIZFO CONSTRLIDYION ENTRANCE 1. STONE SIZE SHALL HE 1-1/2 TO 2-1/2 INCHES. 2. LENGTH SHALL BE WIT` LESS NAN 50 FEET A RUCXNESS SHALL NWT BE LESS PLAN 8 INCHES A, FRIAR FABRIC (10PUI 50OX, OR FOUN) SHALL BE PLACED OWN ENTIRE AMA PRIOR 0 , PLACEMENT O STONE. S WIDTH SHALL of HOT LESS THAN FULL ONION OF At POINTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS 6, NTEFL NECESSARY MOCK ANECI.S SHALL BE WR O D OR CLEARED TO PURL SED MINI L LE 1 PRIOR r0 ENTRANCE ON0 PUBLIC ttIGHi-0f 4 WAY: WHEN WA5111NG E RECLINED, IT SHIN L. BE DOMESHED STONE, ON AN gRCA STABILIZED WIN CPPROA STONE. NTWHICHTRAP GRANS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAP SrOtUFNFRO BASIN. EN RING M SHALL K IN,011PREVENTED FROM ENTERING ANY STORY if USE, OlTAP OR O EROSIOTERCN NSE OL NE IM USE O APPROVED EROSION LCINIROL MEIWW. I I'LL ENTRANCE 5MAL1 Of. MAINTAINED IN A CONOINON MYTH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING O SfRIMOT ONO A PUBLIC RTOYnAF-WAY, THIS MAY REWIRE rE'RIUDIC TOP DRESSING WIN ADDITIONAL STOW A9 CONDITIONS DEMAND, AS MEII A5 MAIN/E OF ALL SITE MOTION, !YkITRDL NEAT!R ALL SEDIMENT DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC RfVHT-43F-WAY WALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIAREY ::•...:'�... ...••� 014 TO+. OF. SUGORAnE . SECTION 4 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Plwl'O:E ,. IN A111MIANCE WI IM T}1E WRMONT WATER OJALIII' $TANDAPDS NE PUPPOSE OF EROSION CORRECT. MCASLAF.S IS TO CONiROi TV. AN STORNIYA Off. FLOWS, MINEWCf.:55'APY. TV PFFVENI' ANY.UNU/L AO- WRSE EFFIGY ON PIE DUALITY OF THE RECEIVING WATERS ING.UDIfIG. BUT NOT IIMITED O CAUSING, .INCREASED EROSION. SEDIMENTATION OR GRANNIE ENLARGEMENT. EROSION POITH71AL: 'MEDIUM 70FAL RATING NUMRfft (INN) : ARPA(A) i (SLOPE (S) ♦ TIME (Y)) A PROXIMITY (P) RATING HURTER: 210 AREA, 3 TOTAL DIS30IIIED PLEA .. I M. -6 x ,AOIL 2 TINY 5 MIOXIMPY 1J FAR: 3 v (2 1, S] + In .- 210 .. FNOSTON WNYRDI S:. fFMPORARY, , A. STMILIAD CRNSMTUGrlON EOTRAN(X., f. THEY rwTCF,gN '. 51(1 1NOE D. IEMPOfAR1'..SEbtNCYI TRAPS E: NAYDgLECNECKO-IT - - -PERMANENT, 101'S014 SET[ r M111 t l - i ,r Bs10NE Rlr-RA . SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL' `�7 ON CONSTRUCTION SITES 3) ril T IFNCE SHALL Bf INS -EC LED WEEKLY. AND AFTER (MIRAFI EMVRO1ENCf. (IN APPROVED' CA , SIGNIFICANT PPCCTPITATIOH EVFNT EOLM MAYBE -"SrITLDI O) AAAfF R ANCY. SHALL OF PTRFORNM AS NECO-R AND FI4IER FABRIC, OR TOWN Slnt I M F SHALL BE RFMOILO -tV -BUR OES' ' I16VLI Or IN !141! SILT FCNCE." iy WIRE'FANUIC - %�la. - ' -•' - WDDOrN OR METAL STAKE A)Nlt(1KFN gIAX ES SMALL RE RLPLACCO PROMPTLY (MAX, TO'OC) _ _ Nry FADRIC INTO;TPwMO (MIA. L lI 1)FENCI, F[),SI SHALL BC ORIVEN, ID FEET MAXIMUM OR .III I t tI L L _ 1 7 'J CLNrm. POSTS SMALL BE DRXW..N MINIMUM 21' BELOW ', .ONAOE. IENCE SHALL BE POSITIONED AS SHOWN '( ll Ili 1Ii { I [� PARNlcc.. to WE DRUUND•CbN I(N/P5 1)IRIR0I SNALI, BE F,KCAVAIED MINIMUM B INCHES OFEP ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF VINCE LINE. CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 3)MAN WIRE FABRIC (14 GA:. 6 INCH MAX. Mf SH OPf.NIfC) SHALL BC 51nrLED OR FASTENED .^.CWREIY EO¢�(1%Z-SEDGE SILT "CC SHALL BE EITHER PRE -FABRICATED MIDI WIRE, LILT ID U"PICAN SIDE OF FENCE POSTS WDWN WIRC FABRIC'AU,' EKIEND MINIMUM 36. EROSION CONTROL FFNCC (MIRAFI fNVIROPE'NCE, INCHES ABOVE CTAnL, OR EOUAL), CA CO/S NLIICLEI)IN-PLACE, AfrKTER FARRIC SHAH SE FASTENED SECURELY ON - AS SPECI lFD HEREIN UPSTREAM SIDE OF WOVEN WIRE FABRIC WIN WIRE Q,RF_FABRTCAIFD yjLE f[,NCE TIES, SPACED EVERY 24 INCHES. AT TOP AND M10- 1)FENCE WALI Bf- NSrAIALO PARALLEL 0 C:ROUND SECTION CV SUNG[ MINIMUM B INCH FLAP OF FILTER TABRIC SIINL PC PE1N TRENCH ON UPSIRUM ALED IMAD. CONTOURS, AND FILTER FABRIC SIDE STALL FACE - UPSTREAM, MESH AND STARES S17ALL FACT SIDE OF VENCC ANW BACK DOWNSTREAM. 5)WMCN TWO SECTIONS Or FABRIC ADJOIN EACH OTHER, 2)DIENCN SHALT. RI: FXCAYAD:D MINIMUM 6 INCHES NEY SHALL IK OVIRL APPED BY 6 INCH 5, FOLDED DELI ON LIPSIREAM SIDI' CN 1LNCE LINE. EXCESS IIAP OF FILTER rMRIC (MINIMUM A INCHES) AND STAPLED. SHALL BE PLACED IN PUNCH. MCNCH SHALL BE 6)SILT FENCE SMALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY, AND NIL& BACKFILLC) AND COMPACTED CYINSMUCTION IN THIS MANNER PREVENTS SEDITWHT.LAMEN RVNOTF EACH SiGNTPICA.NT PRECIPITATION EVENS ' . MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED: FROM FLOWING TINDER. SILT PENCE. AND SEDIMENT REMOVED WIFN 'BULKS" DEVELOP IN $141 FENCE. SILT FENCE SEEDING AFTER DIF FINISHEU GRADE HAS BEEN ESTABLIbHFU AND iflC IFR1ILi!(.R SORE AO, PLANT' DIR SPEC'[TIED SEED MIXTURE AT A.RAIC OF A POUNDS PEP r000 SQUARE. FEfr AND MR FIRMLY MID INE SOIL APPLY SEED ON INC PRFPAAED SFrV LED WITH ARPROVEO MLOIANICAL SUPERS OR I I YDROSFEDINO EOL'IPME..NT UPON COMPLETION OF INC ABOK PLANTING OPERATIONS, POLL ALL ARCAS W7TN A WATER FILLED GARDEN MO.LEN, LEAVING nit MA CE O. ALL AREAS TRUE. TO ORADE, SMOOTH, AND FREE 1RCAl HOLLOWS W ONi,n IRAECU.ARITIFS THOROUGHLY WATER At NEWLY MANIED LAWNS IMWCD(AYELY AFTER PLANi/N4 USING A TINE SPRA PROTCr RANKS AND SMALLS, AND PREVr4r OR REPAIR. LPMION TNAr CAICURS RANKS, SY IC' OR OTHER GOADED'AREAS THAT HAM: BEEN WASHEO 1XIr'OL HAW: HECOMF DANAGTU :NAIL BE Rf."IFLID INMFDIATCI.Y (ALES. All-N) N I GRAMTED BY DUE EUGENIO 10 PLANT OF SCA- SON. SEEDING WILL BL f.OWn,! ED ONLY DURING RE PERIOD FROM APRIL 15 10 JURY I OR AIEA051 15 1O'OCTOOEN IS, SO AS NOT rD CAUSE 1NIF.RFCMNK: NO -DINO. M TO PROCEED 5130RE OT IR PHASES OR THE WORN HAS FROORESSFO SUFFIOFENR Y. WINTER CONSTRUCn ON If FINAL GOADING, 515LDING, AND MUICHINC CANNOT BE COMPLETED PRIOR M OCMBFR 15 NCI SEED SHALL RE APPLIED: MULCH WILL BE AP" LED IN NE FOLLOWING MANW..R. A. DOMINO INC. NPNPLANIING SEASON,. APPLY MULCH 'O PW DI.SNRBRO AREAS INAT ARF O HE SEEDED DURING DOE NEW PLANDNG SEASON, B. MULCH WALL HE APPLIED AT A RATE O ID TO 00 PWMJIS (2 RALCS) PER IDOO. SQUARE FEET AND TO A DEPTH OF a OR 5 STRAWS IYNE- OIAIELY AT RR SPREADING MUCH. SrcLAr WEN A NINON $IIKM ,APRWOR AT A RAIN OF .1 POUND. AIR1000 SQUARE FEET, APPLY'U=' NETTING ON SLOPES AS REWIRED BY INC ENCENFF.R. C. HAY MULCH SMALL CONSIST O NOTED ,DOD PROPERLY CURED SIfMS OF 1XILEN GRAINS (MEAI, DAIS, RUEA'AHEA r, E1C.) REASOFIAM Y FNFE OFNEEDS TWIGS DEBRIS OR OTHER OR,L:G110NAOI NAIERIAL. IT SHALL BG FREE FROM ROr OR MOD AND SHALL BE ACC[PTABLF TO IMF CNGINCCR. D MULCH RENDER SHILL BE A WATER 5OUAME BLEND ppFf CANGMIC/NORGANfc MAWRIALC, GFU.ING, NNIDI'NING AND COEL RINC AGENTS. RINDFP SHALL BE CARA#" OF rO MINIl A SEMI-ROAO/8 BIWICGRAOAOI,E MST OVER SEED) C AREA E'. MULCH NETIIW WALL BE LIGMINEWHI PLASTIC. COIGN OR JUTS NETTING. ,PRODUCT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE EWINEFP: l AT RIC BEGINNING OF 'INC NEXT, PLANTING SEASON, REMOVE RE MULCHING AM SEED ACCORDING BY 'III SPECIFICATIONS SEEDING AND WINTER CONSTRUCTION ZVE:OBBBL' FRD.SIRN.-GRLaSBD1.MCASUREu:. 1) TIC SMALLEST PRACTICAL ANI.A O LAND SHALL BF EXPOSED AT ANY ONE TIME, 2) CONSTRUCT IEMPMARY AND PERMANENT SEVIMLNI AND EROSION .CONIF(N. FACILItIES EROSION AND 5F.DPIFNT MEASURES 71ALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY EARN MOVING OPERATIONS 3) SILT FENCE PLACEMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED AS WILD ON PLANS. PERIODICALLY SILT FENCES SMALL K WINTAINCO AND CLEANED UNTIL - ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAW A HCALPFY STAND O .MASS A) BEGIN MONARCHY MU.It ROTARY MULCHING AND SEEDING IMMEDIATELY AFTER CON S IBM ION OF,ALL FILL AND CU.T BLUES. 5) ALTER ALL DISTURBED AREAS NAVE- BETH STABILIZED NE IENP(AMY EROSION COITR(K. MEASURES AM. 10 OF. REMOVEU .EBD570H_LL7NIRDL:YJil11Y.k%LY81811GUR�d2LGi U INC CONOACOIT WALL DISRRIB AND OPEN FRENCH 7MC-MINIMUM PRACTICAL AREA REQUIRED OrM,COMPUSH EACH BEERS WORK. - P) EXCA.LCO TRENCH MATEAIN SHALT OR PLACID ON UPSIMEAM' SIDE_ OF IRM— 3) IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING PIPE INSTAj=ON, FIFE TRENCH SNAIL BE BAC%CILLEO AND COMPACTED. THE DISTURBED AREA SIN�C�'EE(' Q[ MULCHED AND. SEEOD ON A WEEVILY BASIS. A) ARALIE TO SILTFENCES CONETOIRS)LO`BANY 1W7ItK MCA INRNDED TO O: 0WMEDYAMY ONO t5"QED FOR MORE DIM ONE ROSINING (AY . 5) EXCAVA"ON AND; PIPE INSTAM.ATIOI.SHN,4'OS AVOIDED, DLRLIG PERM$ Or SrGNIFILANI PPECtNTAn(XJ '6) AU. SLDNCHT AND EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES ANG WGEIAFI4 STASH IMTJON SNALI. BE IN. ACCUtUANCE Y4`NrHL SPEC'IFICA IIONT FR.REON. ANO TTfC VF'HMONi. ". HMDBOOK'FOR 508E EROSION 5CdFMEN1 CONTRM. ON COMB IA'UCTION SPIES. II l EROSION _CONTROL NOTES I -NAY oR.'STPAW BALL -. INLLf G'kA IL % DUI' RAI.i5 1lKAAIFN 10 IORM A, ;,CRT III ' I. , I. , S' IIMDHLIDO SiAwTC J ANCHOR MALE: IIRM 1' to GOLD@ - �RI'JTTT('S,TIIIR�I�'jl / /� - � ,/ J CONSIRCOTION SPECIFICATIONS i) Y Eb, SIIALI LOKIFI OF MOMED AND A—.p.:._.-.it PNA ROBN PP,O+",, CUkfO ORA55, SIRAWI, OR [FOUNE /TjEE CF.WLED$ - d M�iN'IhhS REASONADL NIGS OR" OR DRIER OB✓CiION.ATCF. MA INS DAI SHALL BOUND . h M FIVI. M WUCCO BY 1N NE AY DALES COMMONLY 1'PO- DOLrO ar:BA[(RB ' IIClLJ1] I - - _ -r'' 1. AFR'R CA , f PAS N I:: If PLAf,I.. L71 ( III( My GEAR ANT/ IN5(AL�f )l iL l{ FA0F1C'(NINAr' 141)) OV R'DI: PRAM(, AND nIt N'GL( r;RA tr BACK IN PLAL'E IHAY-DALES $IIAII..DE PLACED AROUOC ALI II I� IVIf OT ]WETS NOTED ON PPE SITE MAN '. 'III A.) R - ONCE AwWm /ONO AFTER fKRYT ! µt) -. AND-R[PAER ANOTFEPIAOMT.N1 OF 1N11 ' PROTECTION ISMALL RE.MAOE PPIMPRY (WITHIN THE SAYE 00) AS NEEOED. ' 5.) UPON STABDJZA/)ON ppF� THEMLA UPSI1EA11 FPON THE INIEi PROTECTION, DIE INLET - PPOTECIMM SMALL- BE HCMOlAn) W7.114 PI' APPROVAL OF PIC ENGINEER 3 INLET PROTECTION_ ✓_ "' _ MAINTENANCE __---��_•` _- _.-_v_._. iIM7, O PI A((MLfII _-.,-__ram 1,/A07L12EO WEEKLY INSPECTION TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENT IS NOYDF,IW TRANS- BE(ORE' INIIPING SIR CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE .PONIED ONTO PURIM RIGHT CF•WAY ADDITIONAL STUN SHALL BE APPLIED AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. ALl STNMENI tRACKETI. SPRLIA - OR WASHED ONTO PUBLIC ROADS SMALL Be REMOVED IMMEOIArELY SEDIMENT` RArS SEDIMENT' WALL. TIC RCMnYTV AND tH[ TRAP RESTORED WV TEN ffD1- UORWAIELY UPON' C111ATIM OF SWALF,S ON LNOr ACCUMULATED AS ACCUWATED WITHIN b OFDHF NY' Of'INC STONE - Sr'ILJ.WA Y. THE ENTIRE STRUCTIME SPALL M REMOVED AFICR INC AND PRIOR ID PARR! 00N�N4'IWf71Ar1OYS ANYRHEHE ON THE SITE. .. CONSUM'ION SITE HAS WITH PROPERLY STABILIZED. - J SILT FEWIT PERIODIC MSPEC LION SHALL HE NAOF TO INSURE MAY THE SIIT FCNK BEFORE ENTERING DIL lilt IS MAINTAINED IN 0000 OPERATING CONDITION. SLDIMENI SNALI. BE' ..REMOVED MEN ACOIMULATION RFAWf:S (REHIALF THE TOTAL NEW)" OF THE FENCE. SEDIMENT SHALL BE SPREAD OVER STABILIZED. AREAS R DANGER EXISTS. .. DONE E NO ACE Of EROSION D C HA WALL CHECKDAM WE K Y INSPEC AND F' fR OR R PLAf.EMCNT SHA L BE MADE F. 1. SEC f1ON. VA L L ' T I. —AND IXTFIS UPON COAL E IfR OF ! I L ' RCMRWU WHCN .DE' CON- STRUCII.Y AS NE MAS BALES SHALL STABILIZED. SIRIHIYION SITE HAS ALEN PROPihLY STM11:12E0. IW.[i PRO RCftON HALES WAIL SICAI I Of VAAS NEE'DE'F BALEE;I.YV RL P. FROMPTL A AND REPAIR AND Of? IL PLNJ.'MF.N1 M/ALI BI' LNSTR 'T INJ r 1AI H OASINS UPON 1XIMPL i R C REMOVED Al PIE CnNSThNCIION SIR HAS MFN INPNSERLY STAAIl, CONSTRUCTION SITE ' IZED.. OPSD{4: SEED, SL'IGO AREAS SMALL BE MORN AND FCRIILIZED, 11 NECESSARI{' 0 NWIINON SEVEN DAYS Or MMrLETION CF FACI '" AND Ml0.CA INSURE RAPID F-STABLISHMENI AREAS WHICH SHOW SIGNS WARP- StLN. SIMLI BE RESTED@ IMMEDIATELY AND MAINTAINED UNTIL PER- RYXW ARIA " MANENT VEGETATION IS FSrAOLIMKO. - $LONE RIP -RAP RTPMEAP SHALL RE INVrCRO PFRIODICJALLY AN; ADDITIONAL SUNIF vOuN CLMIrtrmw cj Punt IS APPLIED AS NECESSARY 6 EROSION CQNTROL MAINTENANCE AND TIME OF PLACEMENT SURROUND BASIN WITH . S1AKC0 HAY BALES TYPICAL n `.._. T _.__.. ._. CONCRETE END SCC'TION - - - I.I SLUE STORES EXCAVATE TEMP PLARV BASIN AND SFARILIZE 2, SOC SLOPES WIN MIRAMAT 1 00 STQRM INLET TEMPOR{�RY_SEf)IMEfVT TRAP h__ Pm%St title _ BM E(A DO�WL�A/E NpDy K USiNE'SS PARK PIP -RAP WALL BE A WELL (WADED ROCk MIXTURF DOWN TO I INCH SIZE PART)OLEN. SUr.H PIAI 50 PERCENr O. THE MIXTURE BY WEIGHt SHALL. ME LARGER THAN NE LEAST DIMENSION, - -" (INCHES).� EEA.97 DIMi_N910N Hinesburg Road 1.3 E -17 South Burlington, Vt. A HELL GRAmD ADC" MINIURC SHALL RE ED AS A MIXWFC NVIFWSFP PRAR IMILY OF PIE LARGEP NF. STOOUT At M A 9UPFIGIENt MIXitWE OF OTHER SYZFS 0 FILL WE PROGRESSIVELY SbALIElf $tllet LItIE RIDS BEIMEEN STORES S LONE FOR RIP RAP SMALL BE APPROVED; ROUCN, BRDRIN, DUMRK S/OIF WI RH RWEcUtM.FACEO PM- LUTTINC PLACEMENT IN A TIGHT INTERLOCtMO..MANNER WITH IMF SMALIIEA 5MN!$ FItLIN0-VO1D6 WF lWEEN LARGER 5R1NF5. IMFSTUN-R5 SNALI. BIT HARM, $dAW, RESI61AN1 To, WA" AETICM, {'AMLYING. ANU FOR INIF Erosion DetaiL SUITABLE. RUE MMPOSF NOI'D. .Control '. PrOj.,,t h—b Project M.D.8ec _.._.. _.._- DI —._: �.._. AppIOVC 1Q RIP - RAP. _ SIUEWAIX 4TF x VMS)TIM AND OFTFC•7ABLE'WARNINO - Iu01 PA 1µµ1 SURFACE (IACA COAT AND - CHIC SEAL) (_- . I/7" MAX. REKAL At END OT Mo. CURD I EDGE tN 1 R1fJl1 {Yf-AY PAVEMENI ... •/ PS WIRE PASSED THROUIYI SECTION OF GARDEN NOSE to PROR'CI IRON?( - B'CEDAR STARES W/CUT NOTCH A' LAYER SHWOOFD BARA MULCH BE APPROMED BY LANDSCAPE ARCMIIECiI PLANTING MIX SAUCER RIM UOSEII, r CUT, AREMOVF BURLAP `.7xw raIp Or Boor BALL PLANE TREE At SANE DEPTH AT j' WH1CH TREE HAS PREWOU5LY GRDWN i1111W1 �1 CONIFEROUS TREE 011 -CURS S TYPICAL DROPPED CURB N, BIIUM/NOUS-PAVEMENT ...-��, t•r/2,� SURFACE 1. �._...-.....L _ .:. BASE --.1:0WRVE'CURlr 1�!CLA55B CONCRFIC -SEE {•iS-i _ M' • ' W - 3 . - >tl' (.RUSHER RIAV MAKE �� 71" CRAWL BASE.' COURSE'. ICI Illlv� MIRAF/ SOOY' JILIIP FABRIC OR1 fl 'JrL lLJ11 IT' I I l+[� 1 \ 1, COMPACT 10 95X sto. PROCTOR g PAVEMENT AND CURB DETAIL NIS NOTE: B/REPAM ON VIOMPSON AND VOWEIOIN STREETS To BE S FEET WIDE. 4 TYPICAL BITUMINOUS BIKEPATH � aK00'vi �h a NOTE At' RUING LAN1: PRESS BRJK: 6R R.0_W OM USE SVOCRADE UATER/AIS AS SHOWN AND PROVIOP 2' GRAVEL 5WOLOCRS (IHOYP_ SON 51CC� R BOROOJN $SPECS) -- .. _.. ; Q r0' W/DE 1N PLACE 0[ CVNRS 0 1/Tfl LY CASEMENT ( SWffi SNECI EXTENSION J VAN AND ELEVATION OF -_ ... .....�! .. ..._....._ ......._..L_._.... .... ._ 12__. $' Wit. RY CITY N AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION, CITY FENGINEER i Bi IUMiNW3 1DEWALIT 0' PERMIITCD �+ --' U71I.I IY rakniDOR NOTFY: IR' _ rB BI NNINOrS 1' 1. BASE COURSE TO RI: PLACED FIRST YEAR. FINISH COURSE TO BE PLACED SECOND YEAR, SIDEWALK I-1/I' FINISH TYPE TV _ -21/2" BASE TYPE IT 2. ALL ROAD MAMRJAI TO RF APPROVED BY THE AYN)X.CT ENGINE FP AlID _ _6• CRUSREF RON GRAMEI. CITY ENGINEER PIUOR TO IN$TALLAITON, TO APPROVED BY _ - -------- -14, GRAVEL --MIRAFI SOON FILTER FABRIC (A 6' SANG CUSHION 0. AIL. UTILITY MANN/AL'; (SIRWWRFS AND PIPES) PRO Cr ENGINEER AND CITY ENGINEER. BE / _...:p,AONCRETE CVRO. B' MIN, CCTF.D 10 / CIJN55PBAGRAVEL BENEARI RJMiNOUS BIKEPA'IH / I/T'/T . I J,(F'T. � / arr...wn,wuw.na.+.r!+.v. �•r.�.�%T'T _...� M✓^' , r.� 711 / COMPACT �sus RIDE fi) R5X Sn) ISOCKR, f.OMPAI - t, GRAVEL IN 6 10 T LIFTS IO 0.iX SID. PROCTOR A'IOPSOII• .� - .. it E:G lN1L, -GABLE, AND 1[l1.PllT)NF IN CLXAIVII WATER MAIN.. - 2%' ' .. .... -..i : GAS A' UNDIRORAIN PF'RFORATED PVC A$NFD $IONL 9Ac,U-Yv, -�� WRAPPED IN fll RR FABRIC (MIPAFI NOX) .STORM SCWfR ME UWf RORA(N SYS/CM INTO STORM BASINS a NOTES -- INN A$ INDICATED BY FNOINEYA) $ m 1 OW SLN SMUT AND BOWUOIN SIWEI ' . ... SANITARY SEWER IS' MIN. COVER TOP OF PIPE,) (UNOCROPAIN I IE NOW IS CO'. THE WATER MAIN WILL EK LOCI No ON P< SAME SIDE of THC ROAD AS IMF SlovWAIK. A, SLOPE VARIES "MOON,'BURtINGiON Prt(H`F.RTIE$' To COWINE GRAOfNO. WITHIN RIGHT-OFNYAY. %61 SOUTH BURLINGTON ROAD CROSS SECTION I'I nt ( lla _ .:� r;tl' !irnillT I[�itf r�l iI n:i 1 It IIr Ill t I JI �I[l �j 1i )Ill ® {�� Eli � U 11 IIn 11 11 d I 1 i �rF 9 Ir-�Il i K�IEjyL" I �� F,. se! Ir .f l' I I• 'i" III Irr auC. SEC.�e _.1 L 1L 911 !1 jL' i L iFl L , �, rt rIa ,tl IEL FEE. PRO. PRI. PR1, PR7, I•Rl. PkI S[C. RIEPHONE CABLE - - CABLE YARNING TAPE TO RE PLAt1D B' TO 12' BELOW FJN,$S a. GRADE: NOTES ' 1: ALL NF."NCNC$-TD BE 24" MINIMUM IN W101H 2. TRENCH CROSS SECTION fO BE IDENTICAL, Kf DR WIRRIUT'Iii,EIMOHY, JIM . X PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CABLES ARE LOCAIEO IN A COMMON PI :NCH, PK PRIMARY CABLCIS) $MAIk ALWAYS OOCUPY,RF LOWEST POSITIONS. 4, CDNWIT S12ES, 1 Jr'J INGrI PRIMARY LINES , 3 IR S IP(:N PRIMARY LINES TF.LF.PNONF 4INOH CABLE TV 4 INGN g UNDERGROUND POWER 8 ,TELEPHONE • - � Nt f001k FINISH. GRADE.. 4U• ' - f,UTOFE LUMINAIRE GE LUISO W/ 150 WAIT ay. ALUMINUM TYPE III LAMP MAST AR41 l - FIBERGLA.S$ LIGHT POLE IN ED' NOWNAI. MOONING/ MEICHI' SNAKESPEARE OR EQUAL WYE: THIS DETAIL WAS MIOVIVEO BY DM'CITY or $O111H BURLNOIDK R rIx t Ytl DO- ]�MWill �91 TYPICAL STREET UGHT�. a TRUDELL q ;CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 RIAIT PATk Rod - Box kOB Wlllllton VC 05495 87D 6311 _ P Lu A d„ r LU a _I 1 I�VISE RDAD 9F TJlIN 4tiJ �E Pi I Desc Iprbn I O to ( Dy R vlsl I I N FT Prolece ilea . n nAlr A Mn\Alt A h(n Ir! IIFS t I - r, F J4. Io I { 17.4 E_ ,59.. f, r)N15NLd CNADE'_. 1 -45"446' , r KN I�Ir•ria�4! rIk t,� I i pe:nnl ( I WEI nCD WING fAOPIC, 11 tYl 1DAL I - Y.�,�NON�NHIN4 CRQ11 "II MAx VIA PIPE [; 1 &i- C AA ,,•VS.. .. ._ 1. MONOI.IMIC RAyl Lim,- .$ .. 60TN WAYS , TY'E+7rAL 4' ITT, OPTIONAL TYPE RER CATCH BASIN N.TS MALNANAII(t Nfif/I(f M wiNilk INSIIFDT INLET AND OLIRLi I(M ICE 810CKAOf. 2. PFRIMICAI" p1A1N PONU AND RCMUt!' �EDINENI (ONCE EN:RY J TD 5 ,EARS) S.oCLAYLiEbAYS CLAY CUFF.• LULLED SOIL CLAS5Ir1CAF1(n OF SC OR CL MOVIDE CERTIFICATION FROM A OUN,FFIED 1ESFINO FIRM /NA/ MATERIAL ME115 SOIL CLASS SPCCIFIEU. 2. LAN IN 17L1 UNI R:O SUIE L(A9a"ffJCAl1ON OF SM. PRONOE CERrIFJCAIf(W ROM A WAI tfJf.O Ry,INO rlRu TNA, NA TFRIAI NEr VS CLA•S !PL(JFICO. .T. COMPACTION- COMPACT CLAY CORI' 10 W:j AMU (MI" I'R.I. TO 95R DENSITY STANDARD 11W - CO II.S 1 'CMPACT MATERIALS LN A NAXIMUM (AY A. "IT'S . CNP FNIY RILE, Y.CIIDN STONE to , JJP.O WATER El(vA TON �,1y.0 / 2 ZS M( SLOB 10 FkllT R 7 / " k V II ' 1 • � `" Il IUY..1 CMI pR (PEP �. iJl t:l_. .STORM DRAM ., QALVAN1.tED rA END SECTION OR�. • .'. , j r POL.K FHYL(NE END S£CKOV , ISN(j1ED GRADE 1U MATCH TAP(REU / INLET CONDITION srDEs x END $E6nfM j . PRGYM 61 WRTICAt DROP BETWtFN END .$EC`TIDR MWR1. IDP Of RIPAAP 1Ti P ion - �' -- INS/ALLp E.ALVANIZFD TOE KATE AS PER MANDWA9TURENS VFCOICATID"S I " 'I,• I 1 '- STIN4C III PiRM I v/ ' % (SEE S1TE'PLAN FO9 SPECIFICATIONS) 5" +• �� / - M)RAF) 14QN FABRIC CMP OR PVC S DRM DRAM �e OUTLET CONDITION �.-- ITk- u R IT _ �0.1 -t _. �• - I Ifl i i (1� GALVANIZED METAL END SECTION, ', M,.S F,g' nAM LARTH CIEV zY) IS FI l .. h, ZI" CUP 1� \ 4 --- ANTISE.EP CIKIAR L .._,,.... ELEV Al D 1 CCW51RUCi7011 NOICS• 1 NEE) WIN THE. EMOD ER IWIOIL EO ANY EARMWJIRK 10 DISCUSS PLANS 2, INSTAI.1 SUFFICIENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURLS TO PRFYENT IRANF`ORE OF SEDIMENT C', sm, J EAnAM f PONII 70 5111MAOC ELEYA)!UN AND EONSEPLICr DAM. EXAVAIFU MAIERIM, MAY ASDIIARLF TOR EAKIN FILL_ 4. MIEN EARTH FILL. REACHES ELEVATION 3380 Fx1:AVATE AND INSrALI OUR.IT PIPE AND CLAY CORE AR(RIND ENTIRE PERIMEILR Or POND 5 COMPLETE EARN FILL AND STASIL)IF SLOPE'S BY SE'I,OINC AMC MIR.Cn1W.. 8. INS FALL. S)ONr COLFINUC, DURING I.D. FLOW CONDITIONS. _ CLIP, (.No SECTION WILE 1 I SUI+F,,vM6 BASIN W1IN / - 3,Akm HATBALES. / II \N, /� T ExrnvA r , //fr / :..'�ay, -t �,• '.gAENdI M.1Lr,!1 j _. 5LGI Fr WJn1 x/ � / ' �. IEiRAUA(. Ra) ' COTISIRUCTFON SPECIFICATIONS FOR a THE 51RIA`.TIRF Sungl. RE iNSPPCRD III!:a LM FAIN tKN, AND TEMPORARY 'TOFU MI. T SEDIMENT 1RM.5 EMPNA S E NEl gIRB' MAb[I AS NEEDED., AF AC Y n1AL1. RF RfMOIND FR01d illf" I MF SEOIMENr TRAP SNAIL IC CONSTRUCTED BY EACAVATINO A MA WNFN WIE OAIERIAt VAS ACCIINUI.AIEU IO WIITNN 4" r✓ rHf'. IFMPORARY BASIN ADJACENT TO THE STORM INLET. IHE RASIN 10, SrolwVI.IH�TI:i OF VREA6 OWR'S,ABR-Pt-9 AREAS ON ,FIALI 14AVF A VINIMOM VERM OF TIM) FEEI M(A4.IPE) FROM RIF SL fS LESS THAN 4�„ ANIT If NECESSARY, SLEMUD M[" GRASS rO OOr— OF „IE SIORN IMF, . wl SLOPES SIIAII BE I:I OR - rRF.NMT'[RW/ON .., - FI.AIRR — S1ABIl IZED MI RI. MT Re MAT LAG! TO PFEY£N1 EROSION. 1 Ihi R:NPDPARY BASIN, 'A TALI RF RAGA11LLfD AND SPADTLIjID KITH 2. INIET PROTECTION SHALL RE PROWLIEV 6v *RAPPING FILTER FABRIC GRAS5 11P(uJ APPROVAI 111. 111E'11111 LFN. T1LL,MAILRIA!::u11AII 11 (.IRA" 140) OKR NE OPENING AND UTILIZING NAMALES F(M FPFL OF' ROdiJ OA )iMFR ADDD4Ef.E,A T10N A4 ME'lL AS OW ;IZIn SUPPl81T. Srpry♦! AND gGCTfS. STORM INLET TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP' r4`� STORM WATER! POND #Z, DAM a OUTLET SECTION cuy JJe D 4' STONC 3/4' STIFF 7 N MAL _WATER ELEVAr1ON 8" STONE - 2" TO 4" IN S17F. / •`--_Y/ -{� 'S •• LLCV J32.0- `Y - NAryW SOLI, ' , M)RAFI 110 OR FOUR r5"'\ STORMWATER POND •2 BOTTOM uarN,lr, . - -..�. CIRICRAEM p' RMO n ROAD SE NAr£RI.IN S •. - FO' v 46•'A. CCkRUW/TONS - AND AND CND ND SECTITI0 ONS. S J III". C.RANLAAR RACRPILL (SAND) t ' En•� COMPACTED IN 1* WIS 77$ to95X OCHS" SID. PROCTOR 71.51 JE •'' 1 - IUD. • _i BANK RUV CHA W'L C'OMPACIED 1j` EL• ,,..: },a. N 01 11 � U ii %'�'y+ /;J..: A 0 ri LIFTS M 94R s ro.. *h.�nEW JU to, 11 pgpq Y+RUCION `j1 i {0 - ' f C 1`Aet ilE 1M ENOINEOI REFURC IN9TMAAITDN YET n1 h PRGC,JV AND'EAOSWN'CONIROL NEN .' 2. TILL MA,FBIA 11N4ER NAUNCHES AN6 A cull-P1PES'S IAI L RF. PLACED IN ae LAIFltS ON YrO D'I SIDES LX' TIE PIPE ,•` ACED NE'SAto EL[V'T`ION AMA TI7NHED ^OI A COMPACTION. 15FdIMd R� L11Rff FD OY FIE ENGINEER 1.IN51ALIA/rON 1'O. AF DD+/r bNRLNG-10Y RFAU 110W5. - /-7-V SECTION OF GO'^ x' 4G P4E ARCH Nor t MA,s I p Ae aR x�;FY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 D,BI Box .108 WIIIISton, Vt. '.• 05495 (802) 879.685 Uj C7 co W. 4L1d %7 / DescrlpHon EIRte By 1 Revlsfons ., ti �04 ✓Ci' � I i �~1 project title MEADOWLAND BUSINESS,PARK, Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vt. Sheet title Stormwater )details r10ject r,U,, -. - Ex, rr Dll:Ct man ¢e _ D Tw , ApprovedvA+6�.C1[G/.SC�`1�'�1-9 ; V I , S P9 °. PAPA x /N 1'£AC •vi'e ....._. V . /` e:' �Tdu I o'aaC s } r y*J' Wx •y f Jfy VINV NO (Nl ig 0 YZd �' / , y y W / UNNsixf •, }{ i � f rJ' . 0NV 1JAi}?"W` 71.lViAi' ; -.,:x 1 • _ 1 . fr �. aoaJ 8F ` t tis =Rn N3dO 0NY 14011YAW i10 ,DO! G lac � nGz+ stndual.r = QS 0 1 $ s,,�u j _yn uz----'.A.ra - ---- su9aVVW a.rawrtoa sa)mrmR L:r�Nr%>a 1 eb.:_..�.-U*ly **lo-,i ,.e.. t...-,.�--•--•----- 1N9Nr1�!)v3d � i • �, _ �� o r Rn �aa r � � # -� / A //�-�.y NIV3lll5 q.iOd0lk9.-.........., 1 // , 'T d rM:lnr �, / ,v1�dY -' p •." I ( xx •4. Lida (Zbl "{y y�yy�rq� tiue+L '.Gi�.{C= r.4y �" - - .._ '.-:..��... � ^:� s. r: �' , i'"�"+�vt �'�' �,H. ,.�. `".'' 1 ,�yJ7' $+� �• `u ,.w h" ¢jlSi iA4xi�ld �� l I-� 1 r'.�'r ,Sf� �' �_-1-•y'G•—'.�.•%'`�...�_� ... _.--�• `�`;}-^,-"'-e'---_._r/ � �'T ',.. .::�- _a:� �1y•. h` I �. `� , - - :., ,zi / ....- I �--._ __...___--_-��Nve. .___ ._ �_.r_.,_..____-_._ _•' �`} 16au t, _ 9o'((YY".e7p 1 `'MAI-1h FIF:: _1 ar. gQ4 ` S. •. tN31Y3Sd.•i : � •x :i . j(� 'I �E---__-_—_ - •� ovW' •t�v 1... • _ 1 _ . , .. -. - ' 1 • ^ i 1 vV�� pp 4 x w v v wYdpNOLEMX M �r7 �a'aaaa'`�.,.. � '... "NGl(W,tNd5i(Y�'.rh. _...._�% •./ r 1 � (rnwi'�n.'isorn , i..l } J ! 71NBri N)1 vi -` 3M NO 03MAN30 36 Ot VOK SM NVA81S30d / E 30Nf .OY 0350d02k1 'aBF� i1� � � / � I � Nj1 Fa!' ! yP I •. B _ _'._.._..-} Jo+'*'• � ' v: 1 r l 1 • it 1 , (,,. L .._.y.. .. -a3,v �oru.rsl t ,CZ.LS.C9 N ip tt6 j dY>SQ � t7VlN11J+ ��� I � i / ,f k ). � I .IT <s/cI �BG ANYyrxn elrquxel PWivar..'�ii r �'•'.. - '. dCyr 1 fl9-"..v vIs LY 9Nfl A01.. . �. � (�- j. � � ' .+�'1"•µI SL.J.a52( NI )rA"I 9EVii C!) m 1 r ' 0 n � 4rct... I f 1 ITCCg II^^ T W - ■ • • BNk131N LN71ii`Y) N R B CL^,01 LL MOT.VJINO'kaYB %nYB tl5 , ' � I' 1' ^,...;...^'•'^'. "•"'�. *^� ~ . i � l r ...-__.�L � — t Us N .JI-.B Or. 3NI4 Ikl A R(41QYx6 Blurb YRJ we to •.S L9 )19p .iNNA Slreogt4 S,MId Vw 1 rJ/{I � �' � k G ryL ,Bl ANYiNNFi YMRYaa %)Y OC Jf y. �, I ` I I' - q �Il W) •( '.Z Otiv IXIfWUUa WA"Mm Y`, SLNONNOa )lrt: uLLNv'N! "VN NannOu 9NYN ,NAl1N30S A3N .11 .vAfld�'tk ' 1-1�01NV110 hGN 3H1 U1 fl11Y.X5'19d JdTM'GNVT1 +Y13N1 NOItW19m, . RbdUrW 3N1 , 3 NMF1M16 b, fuvd 3H1 m3dpi� u1 lhu AS NARMV1430N(1 U9ION TIUA O> UVd NC7t VOW12M JO NpWOMIGN[)A I � 1 f y A �Jad E x Iba •r"