Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0472 Meadowland DriveLf� PLANNING & ZONING July 8, 2016 Andrew Gill O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC 1855 Williston Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 472 Meadowlands Drive Tenant Change — On -Call Building Services Dear Mr. Gill: This is in response to your letter dated June 29, 2016 requesting approval under the property's umbrella permit for a change in use at 472 Meadowlands Drive. It is my understanding that this new tenant will be On -Call Building Services. It will replace 5,000 sq. ft. previously occupied by Scholastic Book Sales in unit #4 which was a processing & storage use. The new tenant will be a contractor or building trades facility use. A review of the new parking and traffic demands indicate that the limits established under the umbrella permit will not be exceeded; therefore this new tenant is approved. Since this tenant change does result in a change in use, a zoning permit is required. Please contact me to apply for the zoning permit. Sinter ly R ymond J. Belair Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com ATE DEVELOPMENT AND M A N A G E M ENT VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL AND U.S. MAIL June 29, 2016 Mr. Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Change of Use 472 Meadowlands Drive, Unit 4. SD-06-34 Dear Mr. Belair: Further to Permit SD-06-34, enclosed please find an application for change of use for Unit 4 as well as a check for $43.00 which we believe to be the appropriate fee. We believe that the previous tenant was a processing and storage use, permitted in the IO District. The new tenant is a Contractor and Building Trade Facility, also permitted in the 10. The new tenant, On - Call Building Services, will use the space for storage of tools and equipment used on a daily basis to complete work and services off -site at client projects. As we discussed no interior fit -up is planned, and the space will be used as -is with cosmetic updates. 472 Meadowlands Drive, Unit 4 is a 5,000 square foot commercial space (the "Property"). The Property has an issued permit SD-06-34 (the "Permit") which specifically contemplated the use of Contractor and Building Trade Facility (Condition 19 of the Permit explicitly permits such use). The current proposed use is therefore within the parking and trip end allowances authorized by the Permit and we believe poses no issues. Please contact our office with any questions or if you need additional information. Thank you. Sincerely, �) Andrew Gill, Project Coordinator Enclosures ray From: ray Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 11:41 AM To: 'Andrew Gill' Cc: Adam Kendall; Larry Michaels Subject: RE: Meadowlands Business Complex Light Addition Andrew, Thanks for this information. I have reviewed the cut -sheets and have determined that they comply with the LDR lighting standards and may be installed without further review or permit. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City gfcial or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. Lf you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Andrew Gill [mailto:andrew@obrienbrothersagency.com] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 10:23 AM To: ray Cc: Adam Kendall; Larry Michaels Subject: Meadowlands Business Complex Light Addition Hi Ray, Further to our conversation, one of the meadowlands units has requested to install three RAB Slim57 Lights on the back of their units at Meadowlands. The lights would be installed for safety and security purposes. I have attached a site plan with the area where the lights will be installed highlighted in red. I am unsure the exact location of the lights, but assume they will be located over the doors. Looking at the fixture, it does appear to be downcast in conformance with the City's regulations. If you could confirm that this installation is acceptable, I will let them know. Thank you. Andrew Andrew Gill I Project Coordinator I O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc I PO Box 2184 - 1855 Williston Rd, So. Burlington, VT 05407 Office: 802-658-5000 1 andrew@obrienbrothersagency.com I www.obrienbrothersagency.com The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. SLIM57 Created: 09/25/2014 37, 57 and 62 Watt SLIM Wallpacks are designed to cover the footprint of most traditional wallpacks. They are suitable for mounting heights from 20' to 30', and replace HID Wattages from 20OW MH to 320W MH. These ultra -high efficiency fixtures are available in cutoff or full cutoff models. LED Info Driver Info Watts: 57W Type: Constant Current Color Temp: 5000K (Cool) 120V: 0.48A Color Accuracy: 74 208V: 0.32A L70 Lifespan: 100000 240V: 0.28A LM79 Lumens: 4,312 277V: 0.24A Efficacy: 76 LPW Input Watts: 57W Efficiency: 101 % Technical Specifications UL Listing: Suitable for wet locations. Wall Mount only. Footprint: Designed to replace RAB HID WP2 wallpacks, both in size and footprint template, so upgrading to LED is easy and seamless. IP Rating: Ingress Protection rating of IP66 for dust and water. LED: Long -life, high -efficiency, micro -power, surface mount LEDs; binned and mixed for uniform light output and color. Lifespan: 100,000-hour LED lifespan based on IES LM-80 results and TM-21 calculations. Driver: Two Drivers, Constant Current, Class 2, 100-277V, 50/60Hz, 720mA, 100-277VAC 0.8A, 6kV Surge Protection, Power Factor 99%. THD: 13.7% at 120V Correlated Color Temp. (Nominal CCT): 5000K Cold Weather Starting: The minimum starting temperature is-40°F/-40°C. Ambient Temperature: Suitable for use in 40°C (104°F) ambient temperatures. Thermal Management: Superior thermal management with internal Air -Flow fins. RiMB L I G H T I N G Tech Help Line: 888 RAB-1000 Copyright ©2014 RAB Lighting Inc. All Rights Reserved Color: Bronze Weight: 11.0 Ibs Housing: Precision die-cast aluminum housing and door frame. Mounting: Die-cast back box with four (4) conduit entry points and knockout pattern for junction box or direct wall mounting. Hinged housing and bubble level for easy installation. Cutoff: Cutoff (7.5°) Recommended Mounting Height: Up to25ft. HID Replacement Range: The SLIM57 can be used to replace 250W MH based on delivered lumens. Lens: Microprismatic diffusion glass lens reduces glare and has smooth and even light distribution. Reflector: Specular thermoplastic. Gaskets: The unique design of the tight -lock gasket ensures no water or environmental elements will ever get inside the SLIM. DLC Listed: This product is on the Design Lights Consortium (DLC) Qualified Products List and is eligible for rebates from DLC Member Utilities. Accessories: Available accessories include polyshield and wire guard. Click to see all accessories. Email: sales@rabweb.com On the web at: www.rabweb.com Note: Specifications are subject to change without notice Page 1 of 2 SLIM57 - continued Created: 09/25f2014 Finish: Our environmentally friendly polyester powder coatings are formulated for high -durability and long-lasting color, and contains no VOC or toxic heavy metals. Color Stability: LED color temperature is warrantied to shift no more than 200K in CCT over a 5 year period. Color Consistency: 7-step MacAdam Ellipse binning to achieve consistent fixture -to -fixture color. Green Technology: Mercury and UV free, and ROHS compliant. California Title 24: See SLIM57/BL for a 2013 California Title 24 compliant product. Any additional component requirements will be listed in the Title 24 section under technical specifications on the product page. IESNA LM-79 8r LM-80 Testing: RAB LED luminaires have been tested by an independent laboratory in accordance with IESNA LM-79 and LM-80, and have received the Department of Energy "Lighting Facts" label. Patents: The design of the SLIMTM is protected by patents pending in US, Canada, China, Taiwan and Mexico. Warranty: RAB warrants that our LED products will be free from defects in materials and workmanship for a period of five (5) years from the date of delivery to the end user, including coverage of light output, color stability, driver performance and fixture finish. RAB L I G H T I N G Tech Help Line: 888 RAB-1000 Copyright ©2014 RAB Lighting Inc. All Rights Reserved Email: sales@rabweb.com On the web at: www.rabweb.com Note: Specifications are subject to change without notice Page 2 of 2 �' •�—e'wa waJn.w l., �•^'— ' E aASSN 4n.m EVM, re+np Ce'a J' f` ! / �� i T t rp —II I . ErbSV Pad j//% Location Map � t pf • fI, %� W, 1 1 't' \� /' II lI''l, t /t / .��ll,��' / '� I a—/nArmorav,: APdicmf Mhrmotim' �lIl I NY,n,m Eom 4oMy L'uP 9An BOMB A— h P. a / I• >• 1/' i " / �' / ,�.s qg�y j' J , I iwr.vr oslas .s„°yw .m m.ppro.c w wlru A— �'' �' �• � � r � 'sa w re f , � ul l .v � " �� � .ew wre m., s z«ss arrr r CYA55 N W&Mds 1 , 441 ,,r Ilk Iws.yrw.rA„A pX..\._`l`�,;;� 19cr Scale //�v// /// i���/N/��—� _ _____` _ {•".;ice' t o A `" '-- •,. ate+... y Lot Ja' i wAfun � °h a 9 _ — FOR CONSTRUCTION C a.. Site Plan Meadow/ands Business Comp/ex — -- - � �Y AP.I% SCW � Ap• Lot 2 Meadowland Industrial Party -.uon A m».ro s a,.rc. tn,As Arz r«m.A.,a an. am bvrpr.0 ttAa..r w .ros vlza rorsr�v'aaroz 6R6BS i 4INS/NC C lhi�q 6Y�gineers, Ina. - ' 164 AW. Shut Lb M—t , v ant 05046 £T� S` y south: - PLANNING & ZONING June 20, 2014 ' Re: #CU-14-04'& #SP-14-12 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me Sinc ely 4V4 aymo d J. Be air dministrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 1572 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer RE: Agenda #4, Gregory - #CU-147-03 & #SP-14-12 DATE: May 30, 2014, for the June 3 hearing date Conditional use application #CU-14-03 & site plan application #SP-14-12 of Steve Gregory to amend a previously approved plan for a 60,000 sq. ft. multi -tenant industrial building. The amendment consists of: 1) eliminating the restrictions on the hours of operation, and 2) the addition of one (1) cremation retort, 472 Meadowland Drive. Included in the packet is a copy of the original 2011 DRB approval (both conditional use and site plan) for a funeral home and crematorium located in a multi -use industrial building located at 472 Meadowland Drive, in the Industrial Open Space zoning district. That decision will describe all of the performance standards relevant to this application. Proposed here is the addition of one cremation retort, and unlimited hours/days of operation, for the existing crematorium. Apparently, the original restrictions on hours (no more than eight consecutive hours per day, and only on weekdays) were based in part on concerns raised through testimony and submissions regarding potential harm from mercury emissions. The applicant has submitted two (2) letters of support from other businesses within this larger building. That is helpful information, but whether it is representative of adjoining residents remains to be seen. There are two concurrent applications filed here: both site plan and conditional use. As there are no changes proposed to the site plan, there is nothing to consider under site plan review. The real questions, if any, relate to conditional use and performance standards: traffic, noise, odors, and undue adverse impact on the planned character of the area. At least here, with several years of operational experience, both the City and the neighbors have reference points by which to judge whether expanding operational capacity, with unlimited hours of operation, may create new or undue adverse impacts not previously anticipated or approved under the original decisions. The Board should review the original decision and consider the proposed amendments in the context of their conditional use and performance standards. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com CITV OF SOUTH BtJRI,,IN(;TON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I herebN eeniN- that on this 15 day of May ')0 14 . a copy of the foregoing public for Conditional Us6--,— notice —lqpet)f application] OCU-14-03 (application numberl.,-vas sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including The description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17,06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) SBRC Properties, LLC 85 Shunpike Road, Williston, VT 05495 Grandview Farm, Inc P.O. Box 1304, Burlington, VT 05402-1304 Bradley C. Gardner Overvie� P.O. Box 21, Colchester, VT 05446 Greenfield Capital 35 Thomas Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 Raymond C. Schuler 28 Knoll Circle, South Burlington, VT 05403 Scott & Roberta Pennington 26 Knoll Circle, South Burlington, 05403 Dated at So. Burlincitown/cityl, Vermont, this 15th day of May -'7014 Printed Name: Stephen Gregory Phone number and email. 1802)98 -"996"Ste-v6C&gregMtreMaIM-.OoTn— Signature: Date: it Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & 7oning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South llurlvr -ate q -twt r farm, Rev, 1 -'01 _gr(wt Sample ( 'ernfic f& theother Paper • otherpapervt.com • May 15, 2014 • 19 ....._... _......................._..........._..._............ __.- ......... ......... ........................._...................... ............................................_............. tssi*fieds PIANO LESSONS FOR SENIORS "Because it's never too late to learn!" Call Lesley Ely 363-6819 AFFORDABLE SENIOR APARTMENTS les Senior Living Community in South Burlington offers 1 & 2 bedroom apartments. Rent includes all utilities. Optional living and health services. ,ommunity tour every Wednesday at 12:30'p.m. 865-1109 AUTO AUCTION • 150± AUTOS Cars, Trucks, SUVs & More! Wed., May 21 @ 5:30PM 131 Dorset Lane, Williston, VT THCAuction.com • 800-474-6132 4S: Folding bistro 40" table KITCHEN ITEMS: Very large lob - Rustic folding bar $10. Fold- ster pot; large non-stick grill pan Jotting table $10. 802-497- and griddle; very large stainless .(05/08) saute pan with lid; heavy square iron red enamel grill pan. All new �K RACK: Yakima -rack, holds condition, $25 for all. 802-497- kayaks, rear rollers, front 1343. (05/08) les, cross bars, all straps. llent condition. $225. 802- SOFT BALLS: Like new softballs. 3901. (05/08) $2.75 each or $2.50 per piece for the lot. 660-2078. (05/ 15) i PLAYHOUSE: Step2 Playful louse Climber with Swings TIRES: 4 almost like new Gen - ,round. Brand new, still in.- eral Altimax Artric snow tires received duplicate. $500 or size P195/65R15 30/30 and )ffer. Ages 3-8 years old. 802- P1205/55R16 32/32 102.4 , all 4, '939 (05/15) $100..802-864-0603 (05/08) ;HEN ITEMS: Sunbeam :edmix master; $15. Cusinart >l DLC-10 plus with accesso- 2006 MERCEDES E350: Black nd instruction booklet; $75. Mercedes; very good condition, hardly used. Lg glass pitcher; .93K; asking $15,000; 201-927- ookbooks, cooking utensils; 6039.(05/,15) a, )r all. 802-658-1636. (05/08) PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing in the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room,; 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on June 3, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Conditional use application #CU-14-03 of Steve Gregory to amend a previously approved plan for a 60,000 sq. ft. multi -tenant industrial building. The amend- ment consists of: 1) eliminating the restrictions on the hours of operation, and 2) the addition of one (1) crema- tion retort, 472 Meadowland Drive, Suite #7. 2. Preliminary & final plat application #SD-14-14 of The Snyder South Pointe Limited Partnership to amend a previously approved planned unit development con- sisting of 32 single family dwellings. The amendment consists of removing one (1) single family dwelling and replacing it with four (4) single family dwellings, 111 Upswept Lane; 3. Final platapplication #SD-14-15 of Rye associates, LLC to subdivide an 18.01 acre panel into 30 lots for de- velopment of: 1) 36'single family dwellings, 2) four 4-unit multi -family dwellings, and 3) a 5,100 sq. ft. general of- fice building, 1075 Hinesburg Road. . Tim Barritt, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. Participation in the local pro- ceeding is a;prerequisite to the right to take any subsequent appeal May 15, 2014 OFFICE SPACES FOR RENT (2) 4049 Williston Road, South Burlington Suite 8: 2230 SE ten rooms including a kitchen/conference room and bathroom with shower. Plenty of windows make this a bright office. Parking by front door, A/C, H/C accessible, Energy Star heating and cooling. Lit sign on Williston Road will advertise yo,ir business to 25,000 cars a day. Served by CCTA bus. Wide range of permitted uses preapproved. Suite 1: 961 SF, four rooms in same building. Available immediately. Owner managed for fast resolution of any needs. PHONE: BOB 238-0779 south PLANNING & ZONING Permit # X-/Y -0/ (office use only) CONDITIONAL USE / VARIANCE / MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): ❑✓ Request for a conditional use ❑ Request for a variance ❑ Other 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Names) as shown on deed, mailing address, pphone &fax #): MBC Condominium Association, P.O. Box 2184, South Burlington, VT 05407 one - ax - 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) Book 758 Page 461 3�APPLICANT (name mailing address, phone, fax #) teve Gregory, 472 Meadowtand Drive, Suite 7, South Burlington, VT 05403 one - ax - — 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailing address, phone & fax #, if different from above): Same as applicant a. Contact e-mail address: steve@gregorycremation.com 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 472 Meadowland Drive, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: 1705-00107 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing : I am proposing that the existing crematory be allowed to cremate with unrestricted hours of operation, 7days a week. Also, I am proposing the addition ot one cremation retort. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): 18,750 s.f. general office and 41,250 s.f. other approved activities: Crematory, contractor or building ra e, light manufacturing, manufacturing and assembly, printing and binding facility, research aci i y and labratory, and processing and storage. c. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): The crematory is located in suite 7, occupying approximately 5,000 s.f. Size and services remain unchanged. roposing unrestricted cremation hours and the addition of one cremation retort. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing building to remain): The existing building is 50,000 s.f. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine): The building is single story with 10,00-0 s.f. of mezzanine area. The height of the existing building is approximately 32.b feetabove pre -construction grade. N/A. Number of residential Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to remain): g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing & proposed, note office vs. non -office employees): 30 office employees, 40 non -office employees, 20 company vehicles. The proposed use does not add additional employees or company vehicles beyond existing uses. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable): NIA Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 l 8) LOT COVERAGE a. Total parcel size: b. Buildings sm Sq. Ft. Existing 14.3 %/ 50,000 Sq. Ft Proposed 14.3% / 50 II00- —Sq. Ft. c. Overall impervious coverage (building, parkin outside storage, etc) Existing 98.5 % / 4,078 Sq. Ft. Proposed— % / 134,078Sq. Ft. d. Front yard impervious covers a building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 9.� % / 5,3 0 Sq. Ft. Proposed— % / 5,380Sq. Ft. e. Total area to be disturbed during construction: N/A Sq. Ft. * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 0 b. Landscaping $0 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): N/A 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION No additional added 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE N/A 14) PLANS AND FEE Plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V. S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNKNURE OF a� SIGNATURE OF PROPEkTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: G( I have reviewed this application and find it to be: Pelo/MPLETE ❑ Incomplete PRINT NAME The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Conditional Use / Variance /Miscellaneous Application Form, Rev. 12-2011 south _ " ington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SPA tl� - (office use o y) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ❑Administrative ( Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax ft MBC Condominium Association F.U.ox 2154, Southur ing on, Flhone - Fax658-5002 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): Book 758 Pg. 461 3. APPLICANT (Name: mailing address, hone and fax #): Steve Gregory 472 Meadowland Drive, Suite 7, South Burlington, V Prione - Fax399-2184 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax ft Same as applicant 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: steve@gregorycremation.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 472 Meadowland Drive, South Burlington, VT 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 1705-00107 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 WWW.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): am proposing that the existing crematory be allowed to cremate with unrestricted ours of operation, I days a week. Also, I am proposing the addition of one cremation retort. b. ExistingUses on Property (includingdescription and size of each separate use): 18,750s.f. general office and 41,250 s.f. other approved activities: Crematory, contractor or building trade, light manufacturing, manu ac uring and assem y, printing and binding, research aci i y and labratory, and processing and storage. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existin uses to remain): The crematory is located in suite 7, occupying approximately �,000 s.f. Size and services remain unchanged. roposing unrestricted -cremation ours and the addition of one cremation retort. d. Total building square footage on propperttyy (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): The existing building is 50,000 s.f. e. Height of building & number of floors( roposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): T9e building is a single story with 10,000 s.f. of mezzannine area. The height of the existing building is approximately 32.5 feet above pre -construction grade. f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 30 office, 40 non -office, 20 company vehicles. The proposed use does not add additional employees or company vehicles beyond existing permitted uses. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): N/A Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 348,480 a. Building: Existing 14.3 % / Proposed -1-4.3 % / Sq. Ft. 50,000 sq. ft. bO,OOU sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage etc) 78 Existing 38.5 % / 34,0sq. ft. Proposed 3 0. lb —% / 134,078sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing 29.9 % / 5,380 sq. ft. Proposed 2T9 % / -5,38-U — sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) N/A * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): N/A 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC $0 $0 a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): No additional added 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: N/A 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. 11M Q ) , /��///! �'o, h 1� � (mot j I I i l ' Administrative site plan applications require three 3� regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy- 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. ZA��- SA- 6�. a. V, AIGNATURE 01 APPLICANT ATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: [Development Review Board ❑Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Compl ete Incomplete dmini r ve Officer Date The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 4 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC April 18, 2014 Ray Belair City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Meadowlands Business Complex, Unit 7 Dear Mr. Belair: 472 Meadowland Drive, Suite 7 South Burlington, Vermont, 05403 Phone: (802) 399-2979 Fax: (802)399-2184 E-Mail: steve@gregorycremation.com Web: www.gregorycremation.com We are submitting an application to request a Conditional Use Permit for Meadowlands Business Complex, located at 472 Meadowlands Drive, South Burlington, Vermont 05403. Enclosed you will find a check for $163.00 for the application, the last site plan 5 paper copies and 1 reduced to 11 x 17, and a digital copy. We are proposing that the existing crematory be allowed to cremate with unrestricted hours of operation, seven days a week. Under current conditions we are only allowed to cremate Monday through Friday, 8:30 am - 4:30 pm. Also, we are proposing the addition of one cremation retort. The additional retort make and model would also need approval from the State of Vermont, Department of Environmental Conservation, Air Pollution Division. We have been operating for approximately two years without a single complaint. The new proposal meets the performance standards in Appendix A of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. It will not have a negative impact on the community or abutting property owners. Please find the original Vermont Air Pollution Control Division Permit and Technical Supporting Data attached. The emission data references 8 hours of operation, not 8 consecutive hours of operation. The equipment used at the crematory burns very hot (1600 degrees +) and retains a lot of heat. To operate it safely, it requires appropriate pre -heat and cool down times. A typical cremation may take 2 hours, but the machine needs time to cool down before introducing the next cremation. The cool down time could take hours or even a day, depending on the size of the next cremation. Therefore, one machine could never cremate for 8 consecutive hours. Existing parking, lighting, sewer and water allocations will also not be impacted. Please contact me with any questions or comments. Thank you very much. Sincerely, / fit Steve Gregory Applicant �--.VERMONT State of Vermont AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Air Pollution Control Division 103 South Main Street/Bldg 3 South Waterbury, VT 05671-0402 (802) 241-3840 FAX (802) 24.1-2590 November 15, 2011 Stephen Gregory 465 Sycamore Street Shelburne, Vermont 05482 RE: Issuance of Final Permit — Application for 4AP-11-033 Dear Mr. Gregory: The Agency of Natural Resources, Air Pollution Control Division (Agency) received an air pollution control permit application proposing installation and operation of a human cremation unit at 472 Meadowland Drive in the town of South Burlington. The Agency has completed its review of the application and is now issuing a final Air Pollution Control Permit granting approval for the construction and operation of the proposed unit. Please feel free to contact me at 241-2365 if I can be of any further assistance or if you have any questions or comments regarding this matter. Sincerely, ay S. Hollingsw� Engineering Services Section Air Pollution Control Division Enclosures JH:jh A2: Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC. - South Burlington Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury #AP-11-033 DEC" EJ11-0338 State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Air Pollution Control Division Waterbury, Vermont AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT Date Permit Issued: November 15, 2011 Owner/Operator: Stephen Gregory 465 Sycamore Street Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Source: Human Cremation Unit Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC 472 Meadowland Drive, Unit #7 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 FINDINGS OF FACT (A) FACILITY DESCRIPTION Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC (also referred to herein as "Permittee") owns and operates a funeral service and crematory at 472 Meadowland Drive in the town of South Burlington, Vermont (also referred to herein as "Facility"). The Permittee has proposed to install and operate one (1) Matthews Power -Pak II cremation unit. The unit is designed to fire charges at a maximum rate of 150 pounds per hour and uses two burners - a primary burner with a heat input capacity of 2,000,000 Btu/hr and a secondary burner with a heat input capacity of 500,000 Btu/hr. The Permittee plans to fire natural gas exclusively in the retort burners. The operations performed at the Facility are classified within the Standard Industrial Classification Code - 7261 (Funeral Services and Crematories). (B) FACILITY CLASSIFICATION The Facility is classified as a source of air contaminants pursuant to Title 10 of the Vermont Statutes Annotated ("10 VSA") §555 and §5-401(1) "Incinerators", of the Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations (hereinafter "Regulations"). In addition, §5- 101 of the Regulations defines a stationary source as any structure(s), equipment, installation(s), or operation(s), or combination thereof, which emit or may emit any air contaminant, which is located on one or more contiguous or adjacent properties and which is owned or operated by the same person or persons under common control. Based on this definition, all of the equipment, operations, and structures at the Facility are grouped together by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Air Pollution Control Division (hereinafter "Agency") as one stationary air contaminant source for purposes of review under the Regulations. (C) PRIOR AGENCY ACTIONS/APPROVALS The Facility does not currently operate the Agency pursuant to 10 VSA §556 any "Permit to Operate" issued by Subchapter X of the Regulations. (D) FACILITY PERMIT APPLICABILITY under any prior "Permit to Construct' issued by and §§5-501 and/or 5-502 of the Regulations or the Agency pursuant to 10 VSA §556a and As noted above, the Facility is classified as a source of air contaminants under §5-401 of the Regulations. Pursuant to 10 VSA §556 and §5-501 of the Regulations a Permit to Construct, or an amendment to any existing Permit to Construct, must be obtained before commencing the construction, installation, modification or operation of an air contaminant source. Page 2 of 13 { Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 Pursuant to 10 VSA §556a and Subchapter X of the Regulations a Permit to Operate is required for any air contaminant source with allowable emissions of all air contaminants combined of ten (10) tons per year ("tpy") or more or that is otherwise subject to Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations ("40 CFR") Part 70. Allowable emissions from the Facility are estimated to be less than ten (10) tpy combined and the Facility is not otherwise required to obtain a Title V permit therefore the Facility is not required to obtain a Permit to Operate consistent with the requirements of Subchapter X of the Regulations. Future Allowable Air Contaminant Emissions (tons/year)' PM/PM,o SOz NO, CO VOCs Total Criteria z HAPs 1.1 Neg. 1.9 0.1 Neg. <10 <10/25 PM/PM10 - particulate matter and particulate matter of 10 micrometers in size or smaller; SO2 - sulfur dioxide; NO - oxides of nitrogen measured as NOz equivalent; CO - carbon monoxide; VOCs - volatile organic compounds; HAPs - hazardous air pollutants as defined in §112 of the federal Clean Air Act. z Emissions of individual HAPs each < 10 tpy and emissions of total HAPs combined <25 tpy. Actual total combined HAPs estimated at <1 tpy. (E) REVIEW FOR THE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT (a) New Source Review Designation Any proposed facility with allowable emissions of fifty (50) tons per year or greater of any air contaminant, or five (5) tons per year or greater of lead, is designated as a major stationary source and is subject to review under §5-501 and §5-502 of the Regulations. The proposed project identified in Findings of Fact (A) above will not result in a major increase in emissions. Consequently, the proposed project is designated as a non -major stationary source and is not subject to the requirements of §5-502 of the Regulations. (b) Most Stringent Emission Rate Pursuant to §5-502 of the Regulations, the owner/operator of each new major stationary source or major modification must apply control technology adequate to achieve the Most Stringent Emission Rate ("MSER") with respect to those air contaminants for which there would be a major or significant actual emissions increase, respectively, but only for those currently proposed physical or operational changes which would contribute to the increased emissions. The proposed project is designated as a non -major stationary source and therefore is not subject to review under the MSER requirements in §5-502 of the Regulations. Page 3 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC (c) Ambient Air Quality Impact Evaluation #AP-11-033 An ambient air quality impact evaluation is performed to demonstrate whether or not a proposed project will cause or contribute to violations of the ambient air quality standards and/or significantly deteriorate existing air quality. The Agency's implementation procedures concerning the need for an ambient air quality impact evaluation under §5-406(1) of the Regulations, specifies that such analyses may be required when a project results in an allowable emissions increase of ten (10) tons per year or more of any air contaminant, excluding VOCs. Additionally, the Agency may require an air quality impact evaluation where the short-term allowable emission rates will significantly increase as a result of a project. Based on the level of emissions from this Facility, it is not expected to cause or contribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard or significantly deteriorate air quality. Therefore, an air quality impact evaluation was not required by the Agency for the proposed project. (d) Applicable Requirements The operations at the Facility are subject to the following state and federal laws and regulations, the requirements of which are embodied in the conditions of this Permit. (i) Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations: Applicable Requirements from the Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations Section 5-201 — Prohibition of Open Burning Section 5-211(2) - Prohibition of Visible Air Contaminants, Installations Constructed Subsequent to April 30, 1970. Section 5-221(1) - Prohibition of Potentially Polluting Materials in Fuel, Sulfur Limitation in Fuel. Section 5-231(2) - Prohibition of Particulate Matter; Incinerator Emissions. Section 5-241 — Prohibition of Nuisance and Odor. Section 5-402 — Written Reports When Requested. Section 5-403 — Circumvention. Subchapter VIII — Registration of Air Contaminant Sources. Page 4 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC (ii) Federal Requirements: Applicable Requirements from Federal Regulations and the Clean Air Act #AP-11-033 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart EEEE — Standards of Performance for Other Solid Waste Incineration (OSWI) Units for Which Construction is Commenced After December 9, 2004, or for Which Modification or Reconstruction is Commenced on or After June 16, 2006. This rule applies to two subcategories of incinerators: (1) very small municipal waste combustion units (units that burn less than 35 tons per day of municipal solid waste) and (2) institutional waste incineration units. A cremation unit is excluded from this subpart if it burns 90 percent or more by weight (on a calendar quarter basis and excluding the weight of auxiliary fuel and combustion air) of pathological waste as defined in §60.2977. The proposed unit meets the above requirement and therefore is not subject to this rule. (F) HAZARDOUS MOST STRINGENT EMISSION RATE Pursuant to §5-261 of the Regulations, any stationary source whose current or proposed actual emission rate of a hazardous air contaminant ("HAC) is equal to or greater than the respective Action Level (found in Appendix C of the Regulations) shall achieve the Hazardous Most Stringent Emission Rate ("HMSER") for the respective HAC. Pursuant to §5-261(1)(b)(ii) of the Regulations, all fuel burning equipment which combusts virgin liquid or gaseous fuel is exempt from this section. While mercury emissions are of potential concern with human crematories as a whole due mainly to mercury in amalgam fillings, individual crematories are not expected to exceed the respective mercury Action Level. Therefore the Facility is not expected to have regulated emissions of any HAC in excess of an Action Level and is not subject to §5-261 of the Regulations at this time. Page 5 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 Based on the Agency's review of the Facility's application and the above Findings of Fact, the Agency concludes that the Facility, subject to the following Permit conditions. Therefore, pursuant to 10 VSA §556, as amended, the Agency hereby issues a Permit approving the Facility, as described in the above Findings of Fact, subject to the following: PERMIT CONDITIONS - Construction and Equipment Specifications - (1) The Permittee shall construct and operate the Facility in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to the Agency and in accordance with the conditions set forth herein, including the equipment specifications as listed in Findings of Fact (A) or their equivalent as approved by the Agency. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5-501(1) of the Regulations] (2) The crematory unit shall be designed and operated with a secondary combustion chamber or zone that ensures complete combustion of the exhaust gases in compliance with the particulate matter and visible emission limits of this Permit. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5- 231(2)(c) of the Regulations] [application for #AP-11-033] (3) Stack heights: The exhaust gases from the cremation unit shall be vented vertically through a stack which extends a minimum of four (4) feet above the roofline. The Permittee shall at the request of the Agency increase the stack height of any respective stack if, in the judgment of the Agency based on inspections of the actual operations at the Facility, proper or adequate dispersion cannot be maintained at the current stack height. The stack shall not be equipped with any device that may obstruct the upward discharge of the exhaust gases such as a fixed raincap. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] ]§5-406 of the Regulations] - Operational Limitations - (4) The Permittee shall fire only natural gas in the cremation unit's burners unless prior written approval from the Agency to use another type of fuel is obtained. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] (5) The Permittee shall only introduce and charge human and animal remains, limited amounts of associated surgical wastes including but not limited to disposable sharps, gloves, gowns and dressings, and associated combustible waste containers which have been approved by the Agency. Associated surgical wastes shall be limited to that generated by the Permittee only. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] Page 6 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 (6) The Permittee shall insure that all operators of the cremation unit receive training on the proper operation of the unit from the manufacturer, vendor or another qualified source. The Permittee shall display, near the unit, certification of that training and a certified operator shall be on -site and available during all periods of operation. (10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5- 402(1) of the Regulations] (7) The Permittee shall, under no circumstances, fire any plastics containing poly vinyl chlorides (PVCs), caskets made predominantly of fiberglass and/or plastic, household wastes, trash or other solid wastes in the cremation unit. Failure to comply with this condition shall be grounds for revocation of this Permit. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5-241(1) of the Regulations] (8) The Permittee shall ensure that the last combustion chamber or zone of the cremation unit is preheated to a temperature of at least 1,600°F prior to introduction of the charge and shall maintain said temperature throughout the remainder of the cremation unit's operation cycle. All elements of the cremation unit shall be maintained in good working order at all times. The cremation unit shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's operation and maintenance recommendations. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5-231(2)(c) of the Regulations] (9) The Permittee shall only introduce and charge human and/or animal remains in the crematory unit along with an associated container designed for cremations. Under no circumstances shall the Permittee fire wooden caskets in the crematory unit without prior written approval of the Agency. Approval shall be contingent on the Permittee submitting valid stack emission test data that demonstrates the respective crematory unit make and model complies with the particulate matter emission limit of this Permit while burning a standard charge that includes a wooden casket. Failure to comply with this condition shall be grounds for revocation of this Permit. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] (10) The Permittee shall have the crematory unit inspected and maintained by the manufacturer or a qualified service representative annually or after every twenty-five (25) operational cycles, whichever occurs later. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5-405(1) of the Regulations] - Emission Limitations - (11) The Permittee shall not emit, from the cremation unit, any gases that contain particulate matter in excess of 0.06 grains per dry standard cubic foot, corrected to seven (7) percent oxygen. All sampling runs conducted as part of emission tests intended to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits specified above shall begin when waste material is first introduced into the cremation unit. Any emission testing conducted to demonstrate compliance with the above emission limit shall be performed in accordance with Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 5 or an equivalent method approved in writing by the Agency. [§§5-231(2)(c) and 5-404 of the Regulations] Page 7 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 (12) Visible Emissions [Facility Wide]: Emissions of visible air contaminants from any installation at the Facility, except where otherwise noted in this Permit, shall not exceed twenty (20) percent opacity for more than a period or periods aggregating six (6) minutes in any hour and at no time shall visible emissions exceed sixty (60) percent opacity. Any emission testing conducted to demonstrate compliance with the above emission limits shall be performed in accordance with the proposed Federal Reference Method F- 1 contained in the Federal Register Vol.51, No.168, pp. 31076-31081, August 29, 1986 or an equivalent method approved in writing by the Agency. [§§5-211(2), 5-211(3) and 5-404 of the Regulations] (13) Nuisance and Odor: The Permittee shall not discharge, cause, suffer, allow, or permit from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which will cause injury, detriment, nuisance or annoyance to any considerable number of people or to the public or which endangers the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public or which causes or has a natural tendency to cause injury or damage to business or property. The Permittee shall not discharge, cause, suffer, allow, or permit any emissions of objectionable odors beyond the property line of the premises. [§5-241(1) and (2) of the Regulations] (14) Operation and Maintenance Plan: The Permittee shall develop and implement an operation and maintenance plan (O&M Plan) for the crematory unit within thirty (30) days following commencement of operation of the unit. The purpose of said O&M Plan shall be to ensure the proper operation and maintenance of the unit in order to ensure continuous compliance with the respective conditions and emission limits of this Permit. The O&M Plan shall include, but not be limited to, a detailed description of proper operating procedures, provisions for maintaining records of daily and routine maintenance inspections, findings of those inspections, and any corrective actions taken. Said O&M Plan shall be present at the facility at all times and shall be made available to representatives of the Agency upon request. The Permittee shall revise said O&M Plan at the Agency's request or on its own motion based on operating experience or to reflect equipment or operational changes. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5-405(1) of the Regulations] - Record Keeping and Reporting - (15) Records of natural gas Use: The Permittee shall maintain records of the total quantity of natural gas consumed in the combustion equipment, in cubic feet, each calendar year. At the beginning of each calendar year, the Permittee shall calculate the total quantity of natural gas consumed in the combustion equipment, in cubic feet, during the previous calendar year. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5-405(1) of the Regulations] (16) Records of Usage: The Permittee shall maintain an operator's log book to record the following information: operators' name, date, start and stop time of each charge, approximate weight of each charge including casket if present, casket description if present (wood, cardboard, crematory friendly casket designed for cremation use, approximate weight) and initial temperature of last combustion zone before charging. A separate section of the log book will also be maintained containing records of material Page 8 of 13 r Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC (17) #AP-11-033 safety data sheets (MSDSs) on any plastics fired within the cremation units. Said log book shall be present at the Facility at all times and shall be made available to representatives of the Agency upon request. [§5-402(1) of the Regulations] All records shall be retained for a minimum period of five (5) years from the date of record and shall be made available to the Agency upon request. [§§5-402(1), 5-405(1) of the Regulations] The Permittee shall notify the Agency in writing within ten (10) days of any violation, of which it is aware, of any requirements of this Permit. This notification shall include, at a minimum, the cause for the violation and corrective action or preventative maintenance taken to correct the violation. [§5-402(1) of the Regulations] (19) If requested by the Agency, the Permittee shall notify the Agency at least one (1) day in advance of all scheduled cremations for a specified period of ti +02(1) of the Regulations] Mir (20) The Permittee shall notify the Agency in writing of the date of initial start-up of the crematory within fifteen (15) days after such date. [§5-402(1) of the Regulations] (21) The Permittee shall notify the Agency in writing of any proposed physical or operational change at the Facility which may increase the emission rate of any air contaminant to the ambient air regardless of any concurrent emission reductions that may be achieved. This notification requirement includes, but is not limited to, the proposed installation of any new equipment that is a source of air pollution, including the replacement of an existing permitted air pollution source. If the Agency determines that a permit amendment is required, a new application and the appropriate application fee shall be submitted. The permit amendment shall be obtained prior to commencing any such change except as may otherwise be allowed by the Regulations. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§§5-402(i) i and 5-501 of the Regulations] (22) Annual Registration: The Permittee shall calculate the quantity of emissions of air ! contaminants from the Facility annually. While a crematory unit operated in compliance with this Permit would not be expected to generate emissions in excess of five (5) tons per year, if the Facility does emit more than five (5) tons of any and all air contaminants per year, the Permittee shall register the source with the Secretary of the Agency (hereinafter "Secretary"), and shall renew such registration annually. Each day of operating a source which is subject to registration without a valid, current registration shall constitute a separate violation and subject the Permittee to civil penalties. The registration process shall follow the procedures set forth in Subchapter VIII of the Regulations, including the payment of the annual registration fee on or before May 15 of each year. [Subchapter VIII §§5-802, 5-803, 5-807, 5-808 of the Regulations] Page 9 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 (23) All records, reports, and notifications that are required to be submitted to the Agency by this Permit shall be submitted to: Agency of Natural Resources Air Pollution Control Division 103 South Main Street, Bldg 3 South Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0402. [§5-402(1) of the Regulations] - Standard Permit Conditions - (24) At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners and operators shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate any affected facility including associated air pollution control equipment in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether acceptable operating and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to the Agency which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, opacity observations, review of operating and maintenance procedures, and inspection of the source. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] (25) Approval to construct or modify under this Permit shall become invalid if construction or modification is not commenced within eighteen (18) months after issuance of this Permit, if construction or modification is discontinued for a period of eighteen (18) months or more, or if construction is not substantially completed within a reasonable time. The Agency may extend any one of these periods upon a satisfactory showing that an extension is justified. The term "commence" as applied to the proposed construction or modification of a source means that the Permittee either has: (a) Begun, or caused to begin, a continuous program of actual on -site construction or modification of the source, to be completed within a reasonable time; or (b) Entered into binding agreements or contractual obligations, which cannot be cancelled or modified without substantial loss to the Permittee, to undertake a continuous program of actual on -site construction or modification of the source to be completed within a reasonable time. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)) [§5-501 of the Regulations) Page 10 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 (26) These Permit conditions may be suspended, terminated, modified, or revoked for cause and reissued upon the filing of a written request with the Secretary of the Agency (hereinafter "Secretary") or upon the Secretary's own motion. Any modification shall be granted only with the written approval of the Secretary. If the Secretary finds that modification is appropriate, only the conditions subject to modification shall be re- opened. The filing of a request for modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or of a notification of planned changes or anticipated non-compliance does not stay any terms or conditions of this Permit. The Secretary may provide opportunity for public comment on any proposed modification of these conditions. If public comments are solicited, the Secretary shall follow the procedures set forth in 10 V.S.A. §556 and §556a, as amended. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] (27) The Permittee shall furnish to the Agency, within a reasonable time, any information that the Agency may request in writing to determine whether cause exists to modify, revoke, reissue, or terminate the Permit or to determine compliance with this Permit. Upon request, the Permittee shall also furnish to the Agency copies of records required to be kept by this Permit. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5-402(1) of the Regulations] (28) By acceptance of this Permit, the Permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the properties covered by the Permit, at reasonable times, to ascertain compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations and with this Permit. The Permittee also agrees to give the Agency access to review and copy any records required to be maintained by this Permit, and to sample or monitor at reasonable times to ascertain compliance with this Permit. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [ §§5-402(1) and 5-404 of the Regulations] (29) All data, plans, specifications, analyses and other information submitted or caused to be submitted to the Agency as part of the application for this Permit or an amendment to this Permit shall be complete and truthful and, for Title V permit applications, certified by a responsible official whose designation has been approved by the Secretary. Any such submission which is false or misleading shall be sufficient grounds for denial or revocation of this Permit, and may result in a fine and/or imprisonment under the authority of Vermont statutes. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5-505 of the Regulations] (30) For the purpose of establishing whether or not a person has violated or is in violation of any condition of this Permit, nothing in this Permit shall preclude the use, including the exclusive use, of any credible evidence or information relevant to whether a source would have been in compliance with applicable requirements if the appropriate performance or compliance test or procedure had been performed. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] (31) Any permit noncompliance could constitute a violation of the federal Clean Air Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or for denial of a permit renewal application. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] (32) It shall not be a defense for the Permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity to maintain compliance with the conditions of this Permit. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] Page 11 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 (33) No person shall build, erect, install or use any article, machine, equipment or other contrivances, the use of which, without resulting in a reduction in the total release of air contaminants to the atmosphere, reduces or conceals an emission which otherwise would constitute a violation of these Regulations. [§5-403 of the Regulations] (34) The provisions of this Permit are severable. If any provision of this Permit, or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity shall not apply to any other portion of this Permit which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application thereof. po V.S.A. §556(c)] (35) This Permit does not convey any property rights of any sort or any exclusive privilege, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] (36) All subsequent owners and/or operators of this Facility must request an amendment and transfer of this Permit prior to commencing any operations covered by this Permit. All subsequent owners and/or operators shall submit to the Agency as part of the request for amendment all such information the Agency deems necessary to establish legal ownership and/or interest in the property and all such information the Agency deems necessary to ensure the new owners and/or operators will construct and operate the Facility in compliance with the Regulations and this Permit. The terms and conditions of this Permit shall remain in full force and effect after submittal of the request for amendment and until the issuance of an amended Permit or denial. Should the Secretary deny the request, the new owner and/or operator must take whatever action is necessary to comply with the denial. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§§5-501 of the Regulations] (37) Renewable Energy Projects — Right to Appeal to Public Service Board. If this decision relates to a renewable energy plant for which a certificate of public good is required under 30 V.S.A. §248, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the Vermont Public Service Board pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §8506. This section does not apply to a facility that is subject to 10 V.S.A. §1004 (dams before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission), 10 V.S.A. §1006 (certification of hydroelectric projects) or 10 V.S.A. Chapter 43 (dams). Any appeal under this section must be filed with the Clerk of the Public Service Board within 30 days of the date of this decision; the appellant must file with the Clerk an original and six copies of its appeal. The appellant shall provide notice of the filing of an appeal in accordance with 10 V.S.A. 8504(c)(2), and shall also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal on the Vermont Department of Public Service. For further information, see the Rules and General Orders of the Public Service Board, available on line at www.psb.vermont.gov. The address for the Public Service Board is 112 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont, 05620-2701 (Tel. # 802-828-2358). Page 12 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 (38) All Other Projects — Right to Appeal to Environmental Court. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vermontjudiciary.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-828- 1660). (39) The conditions of this Permit as set forth above supercede all conditions contained in all prior Permits issued by the Agency to the Permittee for this Facility. t10 V.S.A. §556(c)i The Agency's issuance of this Air Pollution Control Permit relies upon the data, judgment, and other information supplied by the Permittee. The Agency makes no assurances that the air contaminant source approved herein will meet performance objectives or vendor guarantees supplied to the source Permittee. It is the sole responsibility of the Permittee to operate the source in accordance with the conditions herein and with all applicable state and federal standards and regulations. Dated this 'day of 2011. Agency of Natural Resources David K. Mears, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By: OK,�,x Richard A. Valentinetti, Director Air Pollution Control Division ih A2 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC — South Burlington Page 13 of 13 VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Air Pollution Control Division TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT #AP-11-033 November 15, 2011 Prepared By: Jay Hollingsworth, Environmental Engineer APPLICANT: Stephen Gregory 465 Sycamore Street Shelburne. Vermont 05482 SOURCE: Human Cremation Unit Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC 472 Meadowland Drive, Unit #7 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 APPLICATION CONTACT: Stephen Gregory 465 Sycamore Street Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Tel. - (802) 985-9996 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC INTRODUCTION #AP-11-033 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC (also referred to herein as "Permittee") owns and operates a funeral service and crematory at 472 Meadowland Drive in the town of South Burlington, Vermont (also referred to herein as "Facility"). The Permittee has proposed to install and operate one (1) Matthews Power -Pak II cremation unit. The unit is designed to fire charges at a maximum rate of 150 pounds per hour and uses two burners - a primary burner with a heat input capacity of 2,000,000 Btu/hr and a secondary burner with a heat input capacity of 500,000 Btu/hr. The Permittee plans to fire natural gas exclusively in the retort. The operations performed at the Facility are classified within the Standard Industrial Classification Code - 7261 (Funeral Services and Crematories). A. Administrative Summary Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC submitted an application for an Air Pollution Control Permit to Construct (#AP-11-033) on October 20, 2011. The application was determined to be administratively complete on October 20, 2011. This Technical Analysis details the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Air Pollution Control Division's (hereinafter "Agency") review of the proposed human crematory unit. Table 1-1 is a summary of the administrative procedures undertaken to date by the Agency. Table 1-1: Administrative Summary Administrative Item Result or Date Date Application for Permit to Construct Received: 10/20/11 Date Application Determined Administratively Complete: 10/20/11 Date & Location Receipt of Application Noticed: Not Required Affected State(s) Noticed & Date Affected States Noticed of Application Receipt: Not Required Date Technically Complete: 10/26/11 Date Draft Decision: Not Required Affected State(s) Noticed &Date Affected States and EPA Noticed of Draft Decision: Not Required Date Submitted to U.S. EPA: Not Required Total Application Fees: $1,000.00 Classification of Source Under Section 5-401: (1) Incinerators New Source Review Designation of Proposed Facility/Modification: Non -Major New Source Review Designation of New Facility: Non -Major Page 2 of 9 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 Operating Permit: Designation of Facility: Not Subject to Subchapter X Facility SIC Codes: 7261 Facility Primary SIC Code Description: Funeral Services and Crematories Allowable Air Contaminant Emissions (tons/year)' PM/PM,o SOZ NO, CO VOCs Total Criteria 2 HAPs 1.1 0.006 1.9 0.1 0.04 <5 <1 PM/PM,o - particulate matter and particulate matter of 10 micrometers in size or smaller; S02 - sulfur dioxide; NO, - oxides of nitrogen measured as NO2 equivalent; CO - carbon monoxide; VOCs - volatile organic compounds; HAPs - hazardous air pollutants as defined in §112 of the federal Clean Air Act. 2 Emissions of individual HAPs each < 10 tpy and emissions of total HAPs combined <25 tpy. Actual total combined HAPs estimated at <1 tpy. II. FACILITY PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND EMISSIONS A. Facility Location The Permittee has proposed to install and operate one human crematory unit located in the Meadowlands Industrial Park located in the town of South Burlington, Vermont. The surrounding area is classified on the zoning map as "open and industrial". Residential zoned areas are in close proximity to the south and to the west. Interstate 89 is located to the north of the industrial park. B. Facility Description The Facility is listed under the Standard Industrial Classification ("SIC") Code #7261, Funeral Services and Crematories. The regulated sources of air contaminant emissions at the Facility include the single human cremation retort. The cremation retort is a Matthews Cremation Group model Power Pak II designed to fire batch load charges at a rate of 150 pounds per hour. The maximum heat input rate is 2.5 million BTU/hr and the burners fire natural gas exclusively. The primary burner consumes 2.0 million BTU/hr of the total heat input and the secondary afterburner consumes the remainder. The average cremation cycle is 120 minutes. The secondary chamber afterburner is designed to operate at a minimum temperature of 1,600°F and a maximum temperature of 2,000°F. The Permittee plans to burn cardboard or natural unfinished wooden cremation containers along with the body. Please note that the permit prohibits the Facility from using pouches made of poly vinyl chloride to reduce the incidence of chlorinated organic air pollutants. Page 3 of 9 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 To begin cremation, the operator fires the secondary burner (afterburner) to preheat the retort to a temperature of 1,600°F. Once the retort achieves the minimum temperature, the operator places the deceased human remains into the primary chamber and closes the chamber door. After the door is closed, the primary burner fires and promotes initial and supplementary combustion. Once material combustion is initiated, the primary chamber produces a mixture of highly combustible gases. This mixture is subsequently vented to the secondary chamber and fully oxidized by the afterburner. At the completion of the cremation process, the operator removes the ash from the primary chamber and places it in an urn. To ensure proper operating conditions, the retort is equipped with a thermocouple (located downstream of the secondary chamber flame tip) that sends real time temperature measurements to the main control panel where it is received by a temperature controller. The temperature controller adjusts a motorized butterfly valve located on the afterburner inlet gas assembly to regulate the heat input to the afterburner and maintain a constant temperature. The temperature controller is also interlocked with the primary burner and prevents it from firing until the set point is reached. As specified by the Regulations and the permit, the set point is 1,6000F. In addition, should the retort exceed the maximum temperature, the temperature controller will modulate down the primary and secondary burners. The retort also contains manual controls to reduce the temperature by starving the burners of air. This unit is also equipped with visible emissions monitoring and control system with alarms set at 10% opacity. If opacity exceeds 10%, an alarm sounds and the primary burner shuts down. In addition, a butterfly valve admits additional air to the secondary chamber to accelerate the oxidation of emissions. C. Emission Calculations The regulated source of air contaminants at the Facility is the cremation unit. All emission calculations are based on an unrestricted operating schedule of 8,760 hours per year firing at a maximum rate of 2.5 MMBtu/hr for both primary and secondary burners combined. The calculations made to determine allowable emissions of particulate matter ("PM/PM10"), oxides of nitrogen ("NO),"), volatile organic compounds ("VOCs"), carbon monoxide ("CO"), and sulfur dioxide ("S02") from the crematory unit are presented below. Emissions of hazardous air pollutants are assumed to be less than one ton per year. Particulate Emissions First, the average flue gas flow rate (592 dscf) and oxygen content (10% 02) were taken from the on file stack test (Southeastern Crematory / Family Funeral Care, November 3, 1999) and adjusted to 7% 02. (592 dscf/min) * (21-10 / 21-7) = 465 dscf/min Allowable particulate matter emissions were then calculated using the regulatory limit and formula outlined below. Page 4 of 9 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC Table 2-1: Particulate Matter Emission Factor Emission Factor Pollutant #AP-11-033 Factor Units Source I -P M 0.06 grains/dscf @ 7% 02 §5-231(2)(c) of the Regulations (465 dscf/min) * (0.06 grain/dscf) * (1 Ib/7000 grains) * (60 min/1hr) * (8760 hr/1yr) * (1 ton/2000 lb) = 1.05 ton pm/yr NO, and VOC Emissions In order to calculate allowable emissions for NO,, and VOC, the Agency referenced a stack test (Foster Crematory, April 22, 1998) on a similar unit (B&L Cremation Systems, Inc., Model N20) under another manufacturer's name to estimate emissions. This stack test was conducted on a natural gas -fired cremation retort and the following emission factors were determined. Table 2-2: NO, and VOC Natural Gas Emission Factors Pollutant Emission Factor Factor Units Source NO,, 0.44 Ib/hr Stack test, Foster Crematory, April 22, 1998 VOC 0.01 Ib/hr Stack test, Foster Crematory, April 22, 1998 Based on unrestricted annual operation, allowable emissions were calculated as follows: NOx Emissions: (0.44 lb NOx/hr) x (8,760 hr/yr) x (1 ton/ 2,000 Ib) = 1.9 ton NOx/yr VOC Emissions: (0.01 Ib VOC/hr) x (8,760 hr/yr) x (1 ton/ 2,000 Ib) = 0.04 ton VOC/yr Page 5 of 9 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC 4AP-11-033 CO Emissions In order to calculate allowable emissions for CO the Agency referenced a stack test on file (Southeastern Crematory / Family Funeral Care, November 3, 1999). CO Emission rates were measured for three runs. Below, the three run average in pounds per hour emission rate is used to calculate annual emissions in tons per year. (0.023 lb CO/hr) x (8,760 hr/yr) x (1 ton/ 2,000 lb) = 0.1 ton CO/yr S02 Emissions The Agency used the appropriate AP-42 emission factor and calculations outlined below in order to calculate annual emissions of S02 in tons per year. Table 2-4: S02 Natural Gas Emission Factor Emission Factor Pollutant Factor Units Source S02 0.6 Ib/MMscf AP-42 Table 1.4-2, 7/98 0.6lbS02, sc 1�10 scf) f 1x106 Btu _ 5.9x10 4 1bSO2 6 (1020 Btu) m.mBtu nunBtu (2.5 MMBtu/hr) * (5.9x10-4 lb S02/MMBtu) * (8760 hr/yr) * (1 ton/2000 lb) = 0.006 ton S02/yr III. APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS These requirements include state and federal regulations, state statutes, the federal Clean Air Act, and the requirements of any prior construction permit(s) issued. Applicable federal regulations may include Federal New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) or National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) found in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Parts 60, 61, and 63. The applicable requirements and the Agency's findings are presented below. Applicability of §5-261 (Control of Hazardous Air Contaminants) is discussed separately under Section VII below. The compliance analysis and determination in this technical analysis rely on data and representations provided by the Owner/Operator. Any statements and conclusions regarding the compliance status contained herein are not binding against the State of Vermont in any future legal or administrative proceedings. Page 6 of 9 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 A. Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations and Statutes §§5-201, 5-202, and 5-203 - Open Burning Prohibited. This regulation prohibits open burning at the Facility except in conformity with the provisions of Section 5-201, 5-202, and 5-203 of the Regulations. Based on the application and information available to the Agency, no open burning is conducted at the Facility. §5-211(2) - Prohibition of Visible Air Contaminants - Installations constructed subsequent to April 30, 1970. This regulation applies to the Facility's cremation retort. The applicant is expected to comply with this regulation based on proper equipment design, operation and maintenance of the cremation retort. As previously mentioned, the cremation retort is to be equipped with a visual emissions alarm and response system. If the unit's opacity exceeds 10%, a butterfly valve opens and admits air to the secondary chamber to oxidize the emissions. After a five (5) minute period the unit reverts to normal operation. The Agency will assess compliance with these emission standards in the future during any inspections of the Facility. The inspections will include confirmation of the proper operation and maintenance of the equipment and any required air pollution control devices and visual observations of emission points. §5-221(1)(a) - Prohibition of Potentially Polluting Materials in Fuel. This regulation applies to the Facility's cremation retort. The Permit requires that the Facility fire only natural gas in the cremation retort. LP -gas inherently has low sulfur content. Therefore, the Facility is expected to comply with this requirement. The Agency will assess compliance with this regulation in the future during any inspections of the Facility. The inspections will include confirmation of the use of the proper fuel. §5-231(2)(c) - Prohibition of Particulate Matter; Incinerator Emissions. This regulation applies to the Facility's cremation retort. The Permit requires that the Facility's cremation retort shall not discharge, cause, suffer, permit, or allow to be emitted any gases that contain particulate matter in excess of.—(0.06 grains per dry standard cubic foot), corrected to 7 percent oxygen. The owner or operator of a crematory installed after June 1, 1995 shall ensure that the last combustion chamber or zone of the retort is preheated to a temperature of at least 1,600 degrees Fahrenheit prior to introduction of the charge." Current Agency policy requires that applicants planning to charge wooden caskets conduct initial performance testing during cremation cycles where a wooden casket is fired. As an alternative, the applicant may furnish the Agency with a written report of the results of an emission test performed on another unit of the same make and model as proposed. This emission test must also have been performed during a cremation cycle that included a wooden casket and the test must have been observed by a state or local air pollution control agency. Page 7 of 9 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 The applicant has proposed to fire only a corregated cardboard container along with the body and has submitted a test report (Southeastern Crematory / Family Funeral Care, Hudson Florida, November 3, 1999) that indicates the proposed cremation retort emits far less particulate than the standard outlined in §5-231 of the Regulations allows. Wooden or other types of caskets will be prohibited unless valid stack test results are submitted and approved for these containers. In addition to reviewing compliance testing or available stack test data, the Agency will assess compliance with these emission standards in the future during any inspections of the Facility. The inspections will include confirmation of the proper operation and maintenance of equipment and any required air pollution control devices and visual observations of emission points. Table 3-1: Cremation Unit Particulate Matter Emission Limit Equipment Heat Input, MMBtu/hr Fuel Type Applicable Regulation Emission Limit Grains/dscf Lb/hr Cremation 2.5 Natural gas §5-231(2)(c) 0.06 0.24 unit Grains/dry standard cubic foot corrected to 7% 02. §5-241(1) and (2) - Prohibition of Nuisance and Odor. Based on the application submittal and information available to the Agency, the Facility is currently in compliance with this regulation. The Agency will assess compliance with these emission limitations in the future during any inspections of the Facility. §5-403 - Circumvention. Based on the application submittal and information available to the Agency, the Facility is currently in compliance with this regulation. Subchapter Vill - Registration of Air Contaminant Source. The applicant is not expected to have actual emissions in excess of five (5) tons per year and therefore is not required to register. B. Federal Air Pollution Control Regulations and the CAA Section 111 of the Clean Air Act - New Source Performance Standards (NSPS). NSPSs are promulgated under Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations ("40 C.F.R.") Part 60. No NSPSs currently apply to the Facility. Section 112 of the Clean Air Act - National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs). NESHAPs are promulgated under 40 C.F.R. Part 61 and Part 63. No NESHAPs currently apply to the Facility. Page 8 of 9 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 IV. CONTROL TECHNOLOGY REVIEW, MAJOR SOURCES AND MAJOR MODIFICATIONS Pursuant to §5-502 of the Regulations each new major source and major modification must apply control technology adequate to achieve the Most Stringent Emission Rate ("MSER") with respect to those air contaminants for which there would be a major or significant emission increase, respectively. The proposed project is designated as a non -major stationary source and therefore is not subject to MSER review under §5-502 of the Regulations. V. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY IMPACT EVALUATION The Agency's implementation procedures concerning the need for an ambient air quality impact evaluation under §5-501 of the Regulations specifies that such analyses shall be performed when projects result in allowable emissions of 10 tpy or more of any air contaminant, excluding VOCs. Air quality impact evaluations are not required by the Agency for individual sources of VOCs. The proposed Facility is not estimated to produce greater than 10 tpy of any non-VOC air contaminant. Therefore, an impact evaluation was not necessary to assess compliance with the ambient air quality standards. The Agency has previously established that increases in emissions of less than 10 tpy do not pose a threat to the ambient air quality standards, nor are they expected to significantly deteriorate existing air quality. VI. HAZARDOUS AIR CONTAMINANTS If the emission of any hazardous air contaminant (HAC) from all regulated sources at the Facility is estimated to exceed its action level (AL), then the Facility is subject to the rule and the emissions must be reduced to achieve a hazardous most stringent emission rate (HMSER) for that HAC. Human cremation units as a category have been identified as a significant source of mercury emissions. Mercury bio accumulates in the human body and can also be present in amalgam dental fillings in teeth. At the time of cremation, both sources of mercury are released into the environment. While the category as a whole may be a significant source of mercury emissions, individual units alone are not expected to have emissions above the respective mercury Action Level. There have been two studies to note that have measured mercury emissions from cremations. One study performed in Colorado by the Colorado Department of Health (June 2007) and one in Dane County Wisconsin (January 23, 2007). Both tests found emissions to be in the range of 2 to 3.2 grams of mercury per cremation. The State of Vermont Action Level for mercury is 0.02 lb/8-hr. Based on a worst -case emission rate of 4 grams of mercury per cremation and assuming four cremations per day, five days per week, the following eight -hour emission rate can be calculated: (1040 cremations/yr) " (4 gram Hg/cremation) " (1 Ib/454 grams) * (1 yr/8760 hrs)' 8 = 0.008 lb Hg/8-hr Based on the above calculation, the Facility is not expected to emit mercury emissions or any other HAC in excess of an Action Level. Therefore this regulation is not applicable to the Facility at this time. Page 9of9 Page 1 of 1 ray From: Summer Stelter [summer@obrienbrothersagency.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 7:54 AM To: ray Subject: Meadowlands Unit 7 (Crematorium) Importance: High Good morning Ray, The business hours of operations for the Crematorium are to be Monday — Friday 8:30 am to 4:30 pm. Can I stop by and pick up the permit later today when you have it ready so I can post within Unit 7? Kind regars, Summer B. Stelter Project Coordinator 1855 Williston Rd P.O. Box 2184 South Burligton, VT 05407 P: 802-658-5000 x 12 F: 802-658-5002 iry o-@obrie.nbrothersagency,com summer_@obrienbrothersagency.com From: Steve Gregory [mailto:skgregory3@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 7:10 PM To: Summer Stelter Subject: RE: Can you please call me? Hi Summer, I just spoke with my dad... The cremation hours will be 8:30 AM to 4:30 PM. Thanks, Steve 2/14/2012 PEOPLES TRUST CO. P.O. BOX 320 - ST. ALBANS - VERMONT 05478-0320 PHONE:802-524-2196 - TOLL-FREE:800-479-2196 August 17, 2007 City of South Burlington South Burlington, Vermont 05401 RE: Irrevocable Stand-by Letter of Credit #2007-12: Gentlemen: We hereby establish our Irrevocable Stand-by Letter of Credit in your favor for City of South Burlington for the account of O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC up to an aggregate amount of $22,500.00 available by your draft or drafts on us at sight accompanied by a signed statement that these funds are due you under the terms of your agreement with the O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC. All drafts must be marked under Letter of Credit #2007-12 valid August 17, 2007 through August 17, 2010. We engage with you that all drafts drawn under and in compliance with the terms and conditions of the credit will be duly honored on delivery of documents as specified if presented at this office on or before August 17, 2010. The original of this Irrevocable Stand-by Letter of Credit must accompany drawings presented to us hereunder. Except so far as otherwise expressly stated, this credit is subject to the "Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary credits (1993 Revision), International Chamber of Commerce Publication #500." ^Very truly yours, ( YTiasw�.a 12 Thomas J Ggher Vice President TJG/pb www.peoplestrustcompany.com CO.PEOPLES TRUST 1 Hamm= ,,�. i i i August 21, 2006 City of South Burlington South Burlington, Vermont 05401 RE: Irrevocable Stand-by Letter of Credit #2006-9: Gentlemen: We hereby establish our Irrevocable Stand-by Letter of Credit in your favor for City of South Burlington for the account of O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC up to an aggregate amount of $22,500.00 available by your draft or drafts on us at sight accompanied by a signed statement that these funds are due you under the terms of your agreement with the O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC. All drafts must be marked under Letter of Credit #2006-9 valid August 21, 2006 through August 21, 2007. We engage with you that all drafts drawn under and in compliance with the terms and conditions of the credit will be duly honored on delivery of documents as specified if presented at this office on or before August 21, 2007. The original of this Irrevocable Stand-by Letter of Credit must accompany drawings presented to us hereunder. Except so far as otherwise expressly stated, this credit is subject to the "Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary credits (1993 Revision), International Chamber of Commerce Publication #500." 74,11"ours, —e l Jr { Richard V anahan Jr President RVM/pb www.peoplestrustcompany.com S I T E P LAN LETTER DF' CREDIT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, executed in trip icate between 9r��h mFGl01��i_LC`__ of 17 >� ��,�.� , hereinafter. referred to as "DEVELOPER", Q�k N of L c� , hereinafter referred to as ""Bank", hnd i 4-v 04- 56,.-YL. ��.\.�. �le�a►1_ , hereinafter referred to as "MUNICIPALITY" W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Developer has received site plan approval from the MUNICIPALITY'S Planning Commission for the development of property located at 4-7 , as depecited on 151 site plan, entitled l�CEN17 SC14�6 )Rc.. A A/ dated © L•, and . prepared by krg1 LAA'Sm a CanS . ,K, f.t"to V-t 4 WHEREAS, DEVELOPER is required by said approval, at its own expense, to complete the construction of the development site in accordance with the plan approved by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement wish to establish a mechanism to secure the obligations of the DEVELOPER for the work as set forth above; and WHEREAS, the BANK executes this Agreement solely in the capacity of issuer of a Letter of Credit hereinafter specified; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. DEVELOPER will, at its own expense, complete the following construction as depicted and in accordance with the specifications set forth in said site plan and related documents: L,i0j8SC-fie- &0 fe hum GC- r),-\ ,o.?%, Mec, d�,a\,�� 3Os 1wess �' 1 2. The Developer shall complete the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1 no later than A - 2 -- pQ 3. DEVELOPER shall replace or repair any defective or improper work or materials which may be recognized within one year after completion of the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1. For the purpose of this Agreement "completion" shall be deemed to have occurred when the MUNICIPALITY has inspected and approved the construction of all the improvements required by this Agreement and issued written notice to the DEVELOPER that the construction is complete. 4. For the guarantee of DEVELOPER's performance of all requirements hereunder set forth, DEVELOPER has caused the BANK to issue its 'Irrevocable Letter of Credit in favor of the MUNICIPALITY, the original of which is attached to the MUNICIPALITY's copy of this Agreement, and a copy of which is attached to the DEVELOPER's copy of this Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, DEVELOPER shall cause the attached Letter of Credit to be renewed at least thirty (30) days before the maturity date thereof. Failure of DEVELOPER to deliver evidence of such renewal to MUNICIPALITY thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration of said Letter of Credit shall constitute a default of the terms of this Agreement. 5. Said Irrevocable Letter of Credit provides that the drafts drawn under said credit, must be accompanied by a written statement signed by a duly authorized agent of the MUNICIPALITY, that in the judgement of the MUNICIPALITY, the DEVELOPER is in default under the terms of this Agreement, and that the funds to be drawn by the draft are in payment for, or in anticipation of payment for materials, labor and services required for completion of the improvements identified in Paragraph 1. Payment of each draft will be made at sight when presented to the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY, the payment limited only by the aggregate amounts presented in relationship to the maximum amount of the Letter of Credit. If DEVELOPER shall be in default of the Agreement for seven (7) days because of its failure to provide evidence of renewal of the Letter of Credit, required in paragraph 4 above, the MUNICIPALITY shall notify DEVELOPER by certified mail of said default. DEVELOPER shall then within three (3) business days provide MUNICIPALITY with evidence of said renewal of Letter of Credit or MUNICIPALITY may notify BANK of such default and request payment under said Letter of Credit. 6. EVELOPER and MUNICIPALITY hereby agree that the sum of loX* • v 4 (� ZZ� SOCK 8'" ) shall be sufficient to secu e DEVELOPER' obligations under this Agreement but shall not relieve DEVELOPER from the obligation to pay any additional costs, if actual costs exceed the above -stated cost. 7. The MUNICIPALITY will promptly submit to the DEVELOPER a copy of any draft it submits to the BANK. The consent of the DEVELOPER to payment of said draft by BANK to the MUNICIPALITY under said Letter of Credit shall not be required. _:2 8. The MUNICIPALITY shall not file with the BANK a Statement of Default until ten (10) days after notice has been sent to the DEVELOPER, by certified mail, setting forth its intention to do so. 9. All funds drawn on the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant to the Letter of Credit shall be used solely by the MUNICIPALITY for the purpose of completing construction of the improvements identified in Paragraph 1. Any work contracted for by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis, or shall be performed by the MUNICIPALITY's own work force and equipment, or shall be accomplished in such other manner as in the judgement of the MUNICIPALITY shall accomplish the work more expeditiously and economically. 10. If payments are drawn on the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant to said Letter of Credit. and it shall later develop that a portion of the monies drawn are in excess of the MUNICIPALITY'S needs, any such excess amount shall be refunded by the MUNICIPALITY to the BANK, to be credited by said BANK to the DEVELOPER. 11. This Agreement and said Letter of Credit shall terminate / and shall be of no force and effect upon completion of the one year warranty period as described in the above Paragraph 3. If the MUNICIPALITY has not delivered any written notice to the DEVELOPER of any defective or improper work or materials in the construction of the improvements within the twelve (12) month period, or if notice has been given and the defective work or materials have been corrected by the DEVELOPER, the MUNICIPALITY shall forthwith notify the BANK in writing that the Letter of Credit may be canceled, and shall return the original Letter of Credit to the BANK, and both the DEVELOPER and the BANK shall be released from all obligations hereunder and under said Letter of Credit. 12. Upon request of DEVELOPER, but only at the •sole discretion of the MUNICIPALITY, the MUNICIPALITY may agree to reduce -the amount of said Letter of Credit required hereunder if the MUNICIPALITY believes that the full amount of said Letter of Credit is no longer necessary to protect its interest, and shall notify the BANK in writing of such reduction in the amount of the Letter of Credit. 13. The BANK may not modify the Letter of Credit without first receiving written consent of the MUNICIPALITY. 14. DEVELOPER hereby agrees to indemnify and hold BANK harmless from all claims, causes of action or liability of any kind arising out of this Agreement or the issuance by BANK of this Letter of Credit, including attorney's fees, as long as BANK follows the terms and conditions outlined in said Letter of Credit. 3 I Dated at 1;� I ,r n , Vermont, this day of t -o �j i,, , 2006 �. ��N''JHE PRE%�� � '4)1 i� l/LLLti C(- e�!, q,--B : 6 Y Duly Authorized Agent (DEVELOPER) Dated at S4•Alb— a , Vermont, this day of Avu W + Z i s � , 20 0 (- N THE P ESENCID OF: Duly Auth rize Agen (BANK) Dated at -5N Vermont, thi day of , 20. J By: Duly Authori d Agent (MUNICIPALITY) rd VERMONT State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Agency of Natural Resources WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A. Chapter 64, Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective September 29, 2007 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective December 1, 2010 Landowner(s): O'Brien Meadowland, LLC Permit Number: WW-4-2638-1 P.O. Box 2184 PIN: 1855 Williston Road South Burlington VT 05407-2184 This permit affects property. identified as Town Tax Parcel ID # South Burlington: 1705-00107 referenced in a deed recorded in Book 758 Page(s) 461 of the Land Records in South Burlington, Vermont. This project, consisting of amending Permit# WW-4-2638 to accommodate an assembly area with fifty seats in Unit 7 related to the use of a crematorium, served by municipal water supply services and municipal wastewater disposal services located on 472 Meadowland Drive in South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. 1.GENERAL 1.1 The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans and/or documents prepared by Scott Homsted , with the stamped plans listed as follows: Sheet Number Title Plan Date Plan Revision Date 1 Site Plan -Meadowlands Business Complex 5/03/20o6 1/11/2010 2 Utility Plan -Meadowlands Business Complex 5/03/2oo6 1/11/2010 1.2 This permit does not relieve the landowner from obtaining all other approvals and permits PRIOR to construction including, but not limited to, those that may be required from the Act 25o District Environmental Commission; the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division; the Watershed Management Division; the Division of Fire Safety; the Vermont Department of Health; the Family Services Division; other State departments; or,local officials. 1.3 The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the landowner and all assigns and successors in interest. The landowner shall record and index this permit in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (3o) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. 1.4 This project is approved for the addition of a 50 seat assembly area in Unit 7 of the existing commercial bulding on Lot# 2. Construction of additional nonexempt buildings, including commercial and residential buildings, is not allowed without prior review and approval by the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. No construction is allowed that will cause non-compliance with an existing permit. 1.5 1.6 Each purchaser of any portion of the project shall be shown a copy of the Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit and the stamped plan(s), if applicable, prior to conveyance of any portion of the project to that purchaser. By acceptance of this permit, the landowner agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property subject to this permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont Regional Offices — Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit WW-4-2638-1 Page 2 of 2 environmental/health statutes, regulations, and permit conditions, including performing an inspection of the wastewater disposal and water supply systems serving the/each structure. 1.7 Any person aggrieved by this permit may appeal to the Environmental Court within 3o days of the date of issuance of this permit in accordance with io V.S.A. Chapter 22o and the Vermont Rules of Environmental Court Proceedings. 2.WATER SUPPLY 2.1 This project is approved with the existing connection to the water supply system owned by the City of South Burlington for an increase of 250 g.p.d. with maximum for the whole building at 1195 gallons of water per day. 2.2 This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their water distribution system. If the municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval. If the municipality approval expires, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an application fee will be required for the project. A new municipal approval letter shall be required. The rules in effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project. &WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 3.1 This project is approved with the existing connection to the City of South Burlington wastewater treatment facility for an increase of 250 g.p.d. with maximum for the whole building at 1195 gallons of wastewater per day. 3.2 This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their wastewater treatment facility. If the municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval. If the municipality approval expires, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an application fee will be required for the project. A new municipal approval letter shall be required if the project is served by the municipal wastewater collection system. The rules in effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project. David.K. Mears, Commissioner Department of Environ'menttal Conservation By �" Je anne Wyman, RegioiUl Engineer Dated January 23, 2012 cc South Burlington Planning Commission Scott Homsted/Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Act 25o District Environmental Commission-41005 Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety 1 P �% southburlington PLANNING & ZONING December 13, 2011 Larry R. Michaels, COO O'Brien Sugarwoods, LLC 1855 Williston Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: New Tenant— 472 Meadowland Drive, Unit # 8 Dear Mr. Michaels: This is in response to your request dated December 9, 2011 requesting approval under your umbrella permit for a new tenant at 472 Meadowlands Drive. The new tenant is "HLE World HQ" and will occupy 5,000 sq. ft. It is classified as a manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components use. This new tenant will replace a vacant space with no approved use. An analysis of the parking demand and traffic generation has been conducted and this new use is hereby approved. Since the new tenant results in a change in use, a zoning permit must be obtained. Should you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, i Paul Conner Director of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com south >PLANNING &>ZONING December 30, 2011 Re: #SP-11-14 & #CU-11-02 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. SincVly, i ymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 3941 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com RFAIMI south a lin ton PLANNING & ZONING Permit # C q -- (office use only) CONDITIONAL USE / VARIANCE / MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): (X) Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( ) Other 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone & fax #): O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC, P.O. Box 2184 1855 Williston Road, South Burlington, VT 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 (p), (802) 658-5002 (f) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) Book 758 Page 461 3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone, fax #) Same as above 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailing address, phone & fax #, if different from above): Larry R. Michaels O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc., PO Box 2184, 1855 Williston Road, South Burlington, VT, 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 (p), (802) 658-5002 (f) a. Contact e-mail address: larry@obrienbrothersagency.com 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com S) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 472 Meadowland Drive, South Burlington, Vermont, 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: 1705-00107 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): See attached letter. Below information remains the same from original application except for 11 and 12: b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): The existing use is consistent with the original approval for the property including up to 18,750 s.f. for general office and 41,250 s.f. for other approved activities including: Contractor or building trade facility; Light Manufacturing Manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components; Printing & binding production facilities; Research facility or laboratory; Processing and Storage (as of 2/12/10) c. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): The modification we are requesting is for a Conditional Use for a "Crematorium" to be an allowed use at Meadowlands Business Complex (MBC). The crematorium will be located in Unit 7 occupying approximately 5,000 s.f. It is anticipated the use will have 2 employees and a gathering space for up to 50 persons. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing building to remain): The existing building is 50,000 Square Feet e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine): The building is a single story with mezzanine. 10,000 s.f. of mezzanine area. The height of the existing building is approximately 32.5 feet above pre -construction grade. f. Number of residential Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to remain): Not Applicable g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing & proposed, note office vs. non -office employees): 30 office employees+40 non -office employees=70 total employees No more than 20 company vehicles proposed. The proposed use does not add additional employees or company vehicles beyond the existing permitted uses. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable) Not Applicable Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 8) LOT COVERAGE a. Total parcel size b. Buildings 348,480 Sq. Ft. Existing 14.3 % / 50,000 Sq. Ft Proposed 14.3 % / 50,000 Sq. Ft. c. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 38.5 % / 134,078 Sq. Ft. Proposed 38.5 % / 134,078 Sq. Ft. d. Front yard impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 29.9 % / 5,380 Sq. Ft. Proposed 29.9 % / 5,380 Sq. Ft. e. Total area to be disturbed during construction: Not Applicable Sq. Ft. * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 0 b. Landscaping $ 0 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): Not Applicable 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 55 VTE, Proposed conditional use will not add peak hour trips 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION Per letter to be discussed 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Per letter to be discussed 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATESummer 2012 14) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre - addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). See attached list. 3 Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 15) PLANS AND FEE Plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. • e SIGNAT RE O APPLICANT e.--7 SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 1a/il /// I have reviewed this application and find it to be: MI/COMPLETE ❑ Incomplete The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 1 VERMONT I State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division Essex Regional Office ill West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695 www.septic.vt.gov December 27, 2011 O'Brien Meadowland, LLC P.O. Box 2184 1855 Williston Road South Burlington VT 05407-2184 Agency of Natural Resources [Phone] 802-879-5656 [fax] 802-879-3871 RE: WW-4-2638-1, Meadowlands Business Complex amend WW-4-2638 to accommodate an assembly area with fifty seats inUnit7located at 472 Meadowland-Drive I South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Applicant: . We received your completed application for the above -referenced project on December 23, 2011, including a fee of $67.50 paid by check #25o64. Under the performance standards for this program, we will have a maximum Of 3o days of "in-house" time to review your application. If we require further information from you to make a decision, the time until we receive it is not included in the in-house performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 30 in-house days, please contact this office. We have forwarded the information contained in your application to the Information Specialist for this region. A Project Review Sheet will be sent to you indicating other state agencies and departments you should contact regarding additional permits or approvals you may need under their programs. If you have not already done so, you should also check with town officials about any necessary town permits. If you submitted your application electronically through eDEC, your consultant will need to upload any revisions and send an email to Ernestine Chevrier, James Sandberg.and the reviewer notifying us that you have resubmitted information. This email should reference both the eDEC number and the WW number for the project. For the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division Ernestine Chevrier Regional Office Coordinator cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Scott Homsted/Krebs & Lansing Regional Offices — Barre/Essen Jet./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury . VERMONT State of Vermont AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Air Pollution Control Division 103 South Main Street/Bldg 3 South Waterbury, VT 05671-0402 (802) 241-3840 FAX (802) 241-2590 November 15, 2011 Stephen Gregory 465 Sycamore Street Shelburne, Vermont 05482 RE: Issuance of Final Permit — Application for #AP-11-033 Dear Mr. Gregory: The Agency of Natural Resources, Air Pollution Control Division (Agency) received an air pollution control permit application proposing installation and operation of a human cremation unit at 472 Meadowland Drive in the town of South Burlington. The Agency has completed its review of the application and is now issuing a final Air Pollution Control Permit granting approval for the construction and operation of the proposed unit. Please feel free to contact me at 241-2365 if I can be of any further assistance or if you have any questions or comments regarding this matter. Sincerely, Jay S. Hollingsworth Engineering Services Section Air Pollution Control Division Enclosures JH:jh A2: Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC. — South Burlington Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jet./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Air Pollution Control Division TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT #AP-11-033 November 15, 2011 Prepared By: Jay Hollingsworth, Environmental Engineer APPLICANT: Stephen Gregory 465 Sycamore Street Shelburne, Vermont 05482 SOURCE: Human Cremation Unit Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC 472 Meadowland Drive, Unit #7 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 F-1 W 61 k CONTACT: Stephen Gregory 465 Sycamore Street Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Tel. - (802) 985-9996 l Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC INTRODUCTION #AP-11-033 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC (also referred to herein as "Permittee") owns and operates a funeral service and crematory at 472 Meadowland Drive in the town of South Burlington, Vermont (also referred to herein as "Facility"). The Permittee has proposed to install and operate one (1) Matthews Power -Pak II cremation unit. The unit is designed to fire charges at a maximum rate of 150 pounds per hour and uses two burners - a primary burner with a heat input capacity of 2,000,000 Btu/hr and a secondary burner with a heat input capacity of 500,000 Btu/hr. The Permittee plans to fire natural gas exclusively in the retort. The operations performed at the Facility are classified within the Standard Industrial Classification Code - 7261 (Funeral Services and Crematories). A. Administrative Summary Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC submitted an application for an Air Pollution Control Permit to Construct (SAP-11-033) on October 20, 2011. The application was determined to be administratively complete on October 20, 2011. This Technical Analysis details the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Air Pollution Control Division's (hereinafter "Agency") review of the proposed human crematory unit. Table 1-1 is a summary of the administrative procedures undertaken to date by the Agency. Table 1-1: Administrative Summary Administrative Item Result or Date Date Application for Permit to Construct Received: 10/20/11 Date Application Determined Administratively Complete: 10/20/11 Date & Location Receipt of Application Noticed: Not Required Affected State(s) Noticed & Date Affected States Noticed of Application Receipt: Not Required Date Technically Complete: 10/26/11 Date Draft Decision: Not Required Affected State(s) Noticed &Date Affected States and EPA Noticed of Draft Decision: Not Required Date Submitted to U.S. EPA: Not Required Total Application Fees: $1,000.00 Classification of Source Under Section 5-401: (1) Incinerators New Source Review Designation of Proposed Facility/Modification: Non -Major New Source Review Designation of New Facility: Non -Major Page 2 of 9 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC *A P-11-033 Operating Permit: Designation of Facility: Not Subject to Subchapter X Facility SIC Codes: 7261 Facility Primary SIC Code Description: Funeral Services and Crematories Allowable Air Contaminant Emissions (tons/year)' PM/PM10 S02 NOX CO vOCs Total Criteria HAPs2 1.1 0.006 1.9 0.1 0.04 <5 <1 PM/PM10 - particulate matter and particulate matter of 10 micrometers in size or smaller; SO2 - sulfur dioxide; NO, - oxides of nitrogen measured as NO2 equivalent; CO - carbon monoxide; VOCs - volatile organic compounds; HAPs - hazardous air pollutants as defined in §112 of the federal Clean Air Act. 2 Emissions of individual HAPs each < 10 tpy and emissions of total HAPs combined <25 tpy. Actual total combined HAPs estimated at <1 tpy. II. FACILITY PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND EMISSIONS A. Facility Location The Permittee has proposed to install and operate one human crematory unit located in the Meadowlands Industrial Park located in the town of South Burlington, Vermont. The surrounding area is classified on the zoning map as "open and industrial". Residential zoned areas are in close proximity to the south and to the west. Interstate 89 is located to the north of the industrial park. B. Facility Description The Facility is listed under the Standard Industrial Classification ("SIC") Code #7261, Funeral Services and Crematories. The regulated sources of air contaminant emissions at the Facility include the single human cremation retort. The cremation retort is a Matthews Cremation Group model Power Pak II designed to fire batch load charges at a rate of 150 pounds per hour. The maximum heat input rate is 2.5 million BTU/hr and the burners fire natural gas exclusively. The primary burner consumes 2.0 million BTU/hr of the total heat input and the secondary afterburner consumes the remainder. The average cremation cycle is 120 minutes. The secondary chamber afterburner is designed to operate at a minimum temperature of 1,600°F and a maximum temperature of 2,000°F. The Permittee plans to burn cardboard or natural unfinished wooden cremation containers along with the body. Please note that the permit prohibits the Facility from using pouches made of poly vinyl chloride to reduce the incidence of chlorinated organic air pollutants. Page 3 of 9 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 To begin cremation, the operator fires the secondary burner (afterburner) to preheat the retort to a temperature of 1,600°F. Once the retort achieves the minimum temperature, the operator places the deceased human remains into the primary chamber and closes the chamber door. After the door is dosed, the primary burner fires and promotes initial and supplementary combustion. Once material combustion is initiated, the primary chamber produces a mixture of highly combustible gases. This mixture is subsequently vented to the secondary chamber and fully oxidized by the afterburner. At the completion of the cremation process, the operator removes the ash from the primary chamber and places it in an urn. To ensure proper operating conditions, the retort is equipped with a thermocouple (located downstream of the secondary chamber flame tip) that sends real time temperature measurements to the main control panel where it is received by a temperature controller. The temperature controller adjusts a motorized butterfly valve located on the afterburner inlet gas assembly to regulate the heat input to the afterburner and maintain a constant temperature. The temperature controller is also interlocked with the primary burner and prevents it from firing until the set point is reached. As specified by the Regulations and the permit, the set point is 1,6000F. In addition, should the retort exceed the maximum temperature, the temperature controller will modulate down the primary and secondary burners. The retort also contains manual controls to reduce the temperature by starving the burners of air. This unit is also equipped with visible emissions monitoring and control system with alarms set at 10% opacity. If opacity exceeds 10%, an alarm sounds and the primary burner shuts down. In addition, a butterfly valve admits additional air to the secondary chamber to accelerate the oxidation of emissions. C. Emission Calculations The regulated source of air contaminants at the Facility is the cremation unit. All emission calculations are based on an unrestricted operating schedule of 8,760 hours per year firing at a maximum rate of 2.5 MMBtu/hr for both primary and secondary burners combined. The calculations made to determine allowable emissions of particulate matter ("PM/PM10'), oxides of nitrogen ("NOx'), volatile organic compounds ("VOCs"), carbon monoxide ("CO"), and sulfur dioxide CS021 from the crematory unit are presented below. Emissions of hazardous air pollutants are assumed to be less than one ton per year. Particulate Emissions First, the average flue gas flow rate (592 dscf) and oxygen content (10% Oz) were taken from the on file stack test (Southeastern Crematory / Family Funeral Care, November 3, 1999) and adjusted to 7% Oz. (592 dscf/min) * (21-10 / 21-7) = 465 dscf/min Allowable particulate matter emissions were then calculated using the regulatory limit and formula outlined below. Page 4 of 9 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC Table 2-1: Particulate Matter Emission Factor #AP-11-033 Pollutant Emission Factor Factor Units Source PM 0.06 grains/dscf c@ 7% 02 §5-231(2)(c) of the Regulations (465 dscf/min) * (0.06 grain/dscf) * (1 Ib/7000 grains) * (60 min/1hr) * (8760 hr/lyr) * (1 ton/2000 lb) = 1.05 ton pm/yr NO, and VOC Emissions In order to calculate allowable emissions for NO, and VOC, the Agency referenced a stack test (Foster Crematory, April 22, 1998) on a similar unit (B&L Cremation Systems, Inc., Model N20) under another manufacturer's name to estimate emissions. This stack test was conducted on a natural gas -fired cremation retort and the following emission factors were determined. Table 2-2: NO, and VOC Natural Gas Emission Factors Pollutant Emission Factor Factor Units Source NO), 0.44 Ib/hr Stack test, Foster Crematory, April 22, 1998 VOC 0.01 Ib/hr Stack test, Foster Crematory, April 22, 1998 Based on unrestricted annual operation, allowable emissions were calculated as follows: NOx Emissions: (0.44 lb NOx/hr) x (8,760 hr/yr) x (1 ton/ 2,000 lb) = 1.9 ton NOx/yr VOC Emissions: (0.01 lb VOC/hr) x (8,760 hr/yr) x (1 ton/ 2,000 lb) = 0.04 ton VOC/yr Page 5 of 9 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC CO Emissions #AP-11-033 In order to calculate allowable emissions for CO the Agency referenced a stack test on file (Southeastern Crematory / Family Funeral Care, November 3, 1999). CO Emission rates were measured for three runs. Below, the three run average in pounds per hour emission rate is used to calculate annual emissions in tons per year. (0.023 Ib CO/hr) x (8,760 hr/yr) x (1 ton/ 2,000 Ib) = 0.1 ton CO/yr SO, Emissions The Agency used the appropriate AP-42 emission factor and calculations outlined below in order to calculate annual emissions of S02 in tons per year. Table 2-4: S02 Natural Gas Emission Factor Pollutant Emission Factor Factor Units Source S02 0.6 Ib/MMscf AP-42 Table 1.4-2, 7/98 0.6 lb SO ( sc 1 1 x 106 Btu 2 l 1020 Btul mmBtu 1 x 10 6, 5.9 x10-4 lb SO2 mmBtu (2.5 MMBtu/hr) * (5.9x10-4 lb S02/MMBtu) * (8760 hr/yr) " (1 ton/2000 lb) = 0.006 ton S02/yr III. APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS These requirements include state and federal regulations, state statutes, the federal Clean Air Act, and the requirements of any prior construction permit(s) issued. Applicable federal regulations may include Federal New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) or National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) found in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Parts 60, 61, and 63. The applicable requirements and the Agency's findings are presented below. Applicability of §5-261 (Control of Hazardous Air Contaminants) is discussed separately under Section VII below. The compliance analysis and determination in this technical analysis rely on data and representations provided by the Owner/Operator. Any statements and conclusions regarding the compliance status contained herein are not binding against the State of Vermont in any future legal or administrative proceedings. Page 6 of 9 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC *AP-11-033 A. Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations and Statutes §§5-201, 5-202, and 5-203 - Open Burning Prohibited. This regulation prohibits open burning at the Facility except in conformity with the provisions of Section 5-201, 5-202, and 5-203 of the Regulations. Based on the application and information available to the Agency, no open burning is conducted at the Facility. §5-211(2) - Prohibition of Visible Air Contaminants - Installations constructed subsequent to April 30, 1970. This regulation applies to the Facility's cremation retort. The applicant is expected to comply with this regulation based on proper equipment design, operation and maintenance of the cremation retort. As previously mentioned, the cremation retort is to be equipped with a visual emissions alarm and response system. If the unit's opacity exceeds 10%, a butterfly valve opens and admits air to the secondary chamber to oxidize the emissions. After a five (5) minute period the unit reverts to normal operation. The Agency will assess compliance with these emission standards in the future during any inspections of the Facility. The inspections will include confirmation of the proper operation and maintenance of the equipment and any required air pollution control devices and visual observations of emission points. §5-221(1)(a) - Prohibition of Potentially Polluting Materials in Fuel. This regulation applies to the Facility's cremation retort. The Permit requires that the Facility fire only natural gas in the cremation retort. LP -gas inherently has low sulfur content. Therefore, the Facility is expected to comply with this requirement. The Agency will assess compliance with this regulation in the future during any inspections of the Facility. The inspections will include confirmation of the use of the proper fuel. §5-231(2)(c) - Prohibition of Particulate Matter; Incinerator Emissions. This regulation applies to the Facility's cremation retort. The Permit requires that the Facility's cremation retort shall not discharge, cause, suffer, permit, or allow to be emitted any gases that contain particulate matter in excess of. (0.06 grains per dry standard cubic foot), corrected to 7 percent oxygen. The owner or operator of a crematory installed after June 1, 1995 shall ensure that the last combustion chamber or zone of the retort is preheated to a temperature of at least 1,600 degrees Fahrenheit prior to introduction of the charge." Current Agency policy requires that applicants planning to charge wooden caskets conduct initial performance testing during cremation cycles where a wooden casket is fired. As an alternative, the applicant may furnish the Agency with a written report of the results of an emission test performed on another unit of the same make and model as proposed. This emission test must also have been performed during a cremation cycle that included a wooden casket and the test must have been observed by a state or local air pollution control agency. Page 7 of 9 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 The applicant has proposed to fire only a corregated cardboard container along with the body and has submitted a test report (Southeastern Crematory / Family Funeral Care, Hudson Florida, November 3, 1999) that indicates the proposed cremation retort emits far less particulate than the standard outlined in §5-231 of the Regulations allows. Wooden or other types of caskets will be prohibited unless valid stack test results are submitted and approved for these containers. In addition to reviewing compliance testing or available stack test data, the Agency will assess compliance with these emission standards in the future during any inspections of the Facility. The inspections will include confirmation of the proper operation and maintenance of equipment and any required air pollution control devices and visual observations of emission points. Table 3-1: Cremation Unit Particulate Matter Emission Limit Equipment Heat Input, MMBtu/hr Fuel Type Applicable Regulation Emission Limit Grains/dscfF Lb/hr Cremation 2.5 Natural gas §5-231(2)(c) 0.06 0.24 unit Grains/dry standard cubic foot corrected to 7% OZ. §5-241(1) and (2) - Prohibition of Nuisance and Odor. Based on the application submittal and information available to the Agency, the Facility is currently in compliance with this regulation. The Agency will assess compliance with these emission limitations in the future during any inspections of the Facility. §5-403 - Circumvention. Based on the application submittal and information available to the Agency, the Facility is currently in compliance with this regulation. Subchapter VIII - Registration of Air Contaminant Source. The applicant is not expected to have actual emissions in excess of five (5) tons per year and therefore is not required to register. B. Federal Air Pollution Control Regulations and the CAA Section 111 of the Clean Air Act - New Source Performance Standards (NSPS). NSPSs are promulgated under Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations ("40 C.F.R.") Part 60. No NSPSs currently apply to the Facility. Section 112 of the Clean Air Act - National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs). NESHAPs are promulgated under 40 C.F.R. Part 61 and Part 63. No NESHAPs currently apply to the Facility. Page 8 of 9 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC IV. CONTROL TECHNOLOGY REVIEW, MODIFICATIONS *A P-11-033 MAJOR SOURCES AND MAJOR Pursuant to §5-502 of the Regulations each new major source and major modification must apply control technology adequate to achieve the Most Stringent Emission Rate ("MSER") with respect to those air contaminants for which there would be a major or significant emission increase, respectively. The proposed project is designated as a non -major stationary source and therefore is not subject to MSER review under §5-502 of the Regulations. V. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY IMPACT EVALUATION The Agency's implementation procedures concerning the need for an ambient air quality impact evaluation under §5-501 of the Regulations specifies that such analyses shall be performed when projects result in allowable emissions of 10 tpy or more of any air contaminant, excluding VOCs. Air quality impact evaluations are not required by the Agency for individual sources of VOCs. The proposed Facility is not estimated to produce greater than 10 tpy of any non-VOC air contaminant. Therefore, an impact evaluation was not necessary to assess compliance with the ambient air quality standards. The Agency has previously established that increases in emissions of less than 10 tpy do not pose a threat to the ambient air quality standards, nor are they expected to significantly deteriorate existing air quality. VI. HAZARDOUS AIR CONTAMINANTS If the emission of any hazardous air contaminant (HAC) from all regulated sources at the Facility is estimated to exceed its action level (AL), then the Facility is subject to the rule and the emissions must be reduced to achieve a hazardous most stringent emission rate (HMSER) for that HAC. Human cremation units as a category have been identified as a significant source of mercury emissions. Mercury bio accumulates in the human body and can also be present in amalgam dental fillings in teeth. At the time of cremation, both sources of mercury are released into the environment. While the category as a whole may be a significant source of mercury emissions, individual units alone are not expected to have emissions above the respective mercury Action Level. There have been two studies to note that have measured mercury emissions from cremations. One study performed in Colorado by the Colorado Department of Health (June 2007) and one in Dane County Wisconsin (January 23, 2007). Both tests found emissions to be in the range of 2 to 3.2 grams of mercury per cremation. The State of Vermont Action Level for mercury is 0.02 lb/8-hr. Based on a worst -case emission rate of 4 grams of mercury per cremation and assuming four cremations per day, five days per week, the following eight -hour emission rate can be calculated: (1040 cremations/yr) * (4 gram Hg/cremation) * (1 Ib/454 grams) * (1 yr/8760 hrs) * 8 = 0.008 lb Hg/8-hr Based on the above calculation, the Facility is not expected to emit mercury emissions or any other HAC in excess of an Action Level. Therefore this regulation is not applicable to the Facility at this time. Page 9 of 9 #AP-11-033 DEC" EJ11-0338 State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Air Pollution Control Division Waterbury, Vermont AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT Date Permit Issued: November 15, 2011 Owner/Operator: Stephen Gregory 465 Sycamore Street Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Source: Human Cremation Unit Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC 472 Meadowland Drive, Unit #7 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 FINDINGS OF FACT (A) FACILITY DESCRIPTION Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC (also referred to herein as "Permittee") owns and operates a funeral service and crematory at 472 Meadowland Drive in the town of South Burlington, Vermont (also referred to herein as "Facility"). The Permittee has proposed to install and operate one (1) Matthews Power -Pak II cremation unit. The unit is designed to fire charges at a maximum rate of 150 pounds per hour and uses two burners - a primary burner with a heat input capacity of 2,000,000 Btu/hr and a secondary burner with a heat input capacity of 500,000 Btu/hr. The Permittee plans to fire natural gas exclusively in the retort burners. The operations performed at the Facility are classified within the Standard Industrial Classification Code - 7261 (Funeral Services and Crematories). (B) FACILITY CLASSIFICATION The Facility is classified as a source of air contaminants pursuant to Title 10 of the Vermont Statutes Annotated (10 VSA") §555 and §5-401(1) "Incinerators", of the Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations (hereinafter "Regulations"). In addition, §5- 101 of the Regulations defines a stationary source as any structure(s), equipment, installation(s), or operation(s), or combination thereof, which emit or may emit any air contaminant, which is located on one or more contiguous or adjacent properties and which is owned or operated by the same person or persons under common control. Based on this definition, all of the equipment, operations, and structures at the Facility are grouped together by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Air Pollution Control Division (hereinafter "Agency") as one stationary air contaminant source for purposes of review under the Regulations. (C) PRIOR AGENCY ACTIONS/APPROVALS The Facility does not currently operate under any prior "Permit to Construct' issued by the Agency pursuant to 10 VSA §556 and §§5-501 and/or 5-502 of the Regulations or any "Permit to Operate" issued by the Agency pursuant to 10 VSA §556a and Subchapter X of the Regulations. (D) FACILITY PERMIT APPLICABILITY As noted above, the Facility is classified as a source of air contaminants under §5-401 of the Regulations. Pursuant to 10 VSA §556 and §5-501 of the Regulations a Permit to Construct, or an amendment to any existing Permit to Construct, must be obtained before commencing the construction, installation, modification or operation of an air contaminant source. Page 2 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 Pursuant to 10 VSA §556a and Subchapter X of the Regulations a Permit to Operate is required for any air contaminant source with allowable emissions of all air contaminants combined of ten (10) tons per year ("tpy") or more or that is otherwise subject to Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations ("40 CFR") Part 70. Allowable emissions from the Facility are estimated to be less than ten (10) tpy combined and the Facility is not otherwise required to obtain a Title V permit therefore the Facility is not required to obtain a Permit to Operate consistent with the requirements of Subchapter X of the Regulations. Future Allowable Air Contaminant Emissions (tons/year)' PM/PM,o S02 NO, CO VOCs Total HAPS2 Criteria 1.1 Neg. 1.9 0.1 Neg. <10 <10/25 PM/PM10 - particulate matter and particulate matter of 10 micrometers in size or smaller; S02 - sulfur dioxide, NO, - oxides of nitrogen measured as NOz equivalent; CO - carbon monoxide; VOCs - volatile organic compounds; HAPs - hazardous air pollutants as defined in §112 of the federal Clean Air Act. Emissions of individual HAPs each < 10 tpy and emissions of total HAPs combined <25 tpy. Actual total combined HAPs estimated at <1 tpy. (E) REVIEW FOR THE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT (a) New Source Review Designation Any proposed facility with allowable emissions of fifty (50) tons per year or greater of any air contaminant, or five (5) tons per year or greater of lead, is designated as a major stationary source and is subject to review under §5-501 and §5-502 of the Regulations. The proposed project identified in Findings of Fact (A) above will not result in a major increase in emissions. Consequently, the proposed project is designated as a non -major stationary source and is not subject to the requirements of §5-502 of the Regulations. (b) Most Stringent Emission Rate Pursuant to §5-502 of the Regulations, the owner/operator of each new major stationary source or major modification must apply control technology adequate to achieve the Most Stringent Emission Rate ("MSER") with respect to those air contaminants for which there would be a major or significant actual emissions increase, respectively, but only for those currently proposed physical or operational changes which would contribute to the increased emissions. The proposed project is designated as a non -major stationary source and therefore is not subject to review under the MSER requirements in §5-502 of the Regulations. Page 3 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC (c) Ambient Air Quality Impact Evaluation #AP-11-033 An ambient air quality impact evaluation is performed to demonstrate whether or not a proposed project will cause or contribute to violations of the ambient air quality standards and/or significantly deteriorate existing air quality. The Agency's implementation procedures concerning the need for an ambient air quality impact evaluation under §5-406(1) of the Regulations, specifies that such analyses may be required when a project results in an allowable emissions increase of ten (10) tons per year or more of any air contaminant, excluding VOCs. Additionally, the Agency may require an air quality impact evaluation where the short-term allowable emission rates will significantly increase as a result of a project. Based on the level of emissions from this Facility, it is not expected to cause or contribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard or significantly deteriorate air quality. Therefore, an air quality impact evaluation was not required by the Agency for the proposed project. (d) Applicable Requirements The operations at the Facility are subject to the following state and federal laws and regulations, the requirements of which are embodied in the conditions of this Permit. (i) Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations: Applicable Requirements from the Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations Section 5-201 — Prohibition of Open Burning Section 5-211(2) - Prohibition of Visible Air Contaminants, Installations Constructed Subsequent to April 30, 1970. Section 5-221(1) - Prohibition of Potentially Polluting Materials in Fuel, Sulfur Limitation in Fuel. Section 5-231(2) - Prohibition of Particulate Matter; Incinerator Emissions. Section 5-241 — Prohibition of Nuisance and Odor. Section 5-402 — Written Reports When Requested. Section 5-403 — Circumvention. Subchapter Vill — Registration of Air Contaminant Sources. Page 4 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC (ii) Federal Requirements: Applicable Requirements from Federal Regulations and the Clean Air Act "A P-11-033 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart EEEE — Standards of Performance for Other Solid Waste Incineration (OSWI) Units for Which Construction is Commenced After December 9, 2004, or for Which Modification or Reconstruction is Commenced on or After June 16, 2006. This rule applies to two subcategories of incinerators: (1) very small municipal waste combustion units (units that burn less than 35 tons per day of municipal solid waste) and (2) institutional waste incineration units. A cremation unit is excluded from this subpart if it burns 90 percent or more by weight (on a calendar quarter basis and excluding the weight of auxiliary fuel and combustion air) of pathological waste as defined in §60.2977. The proposed unit meets the above requirement and therefore is not subject to this rule. (F) HAZARDOUS MOST STRINGENT EMISSION RATE Pursuant to §5-261 of the Regulations, any stationary source whose current or proposed actual emission rate of a hazardous air contaminant ("HAC") is equal to or greater than the respective Action Level (found in Appendix C of the Regulations) shall achieve the Hazardous Most Stringent Emission Rate ("HMSER") for the respective HAC. Pursuant to §5-261(1)(b)(ii) of the Regulations, all fuel burning equipment which combusts virgin liquid or gaseous fuel is exempt from this section. While mercury emissions are of potential concern with human crematories as a whole due mainly to mercury in amalgam fillings, individual crematories are not expected to exceed the respective mercury Action Level. Therefore the Facility is not expected to have regulated emissions of any HAC in excess of an Action Level and is not subject to §5-261 of the Regulations at this time. Page 5 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #A P-11-033 Based on the Agency's review of the Facility's application and the above Findings of Fact, the Agency concludes that the Facility, subject to the following Permit conditions. Therefore, pursuant to 10 VSA §556, as amended, the Agency hereby issues a Permit approving the Facility, as described in the above Findings of Fact, subject to the following: PERMIT CONDITIONS - Construction and Equipment Specifications - (1) The Permittee shall construct and operate the Facility in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to the Agency and in accordance with the conditions set forth herein, including the equipment specifications as listed in Findings of Fact (A) or their equivalent as approved by the Agency. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5-501(t) of the Regulations] (2) The crematory unit shall be designed and operated with a secondary combustion chamber or zone that ensures complete combustion of the exhaust gases in compliance with the particulate matter and visible emission limits of this Permit. (10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5- 231(2)(c) of the Regulations] [application for "AP-11-033] (3) Stack heights: The exhaust gases from the cremation unit shall be vented vertically through a stack which extends a minimum of four (4) feet above the roofline. The Permittee shall at the request of the Agency increase the stack height of any respective stack if, in the judgment of the Agency based on inspections of the actual operations at the Facility, proper or adequate dispersion cannot be maintained at the current stack height. The stack shall not be equipped with any device that may obstruct the upward discharge of the exhaust gases such as a fixed raincap. (10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5-406 of the Regulations] - Operational Limitations - (4) The Permittee shall fire only natural gas in the cremation unit's burners unless prior written approval from the Agency to use another type of fuel is obtained. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] (5) The Permittee shall only introduce and charge human and animal remains, limited amounts of associated surgical wastes including but not limited to disposable sharps, gloves, gowns and dressings, and associated combustible waste containers which have been approved by the Agency. Associated surgical wastes shall be limited to that generated by the Permittee only. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] Page 6 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 (6) The Permittee shall insure that all operators of the cremation unit receive training on the proper operation of the unit from the manufacturer, vendor or another qualified source. The Permittee shall display, near the unit, certification of that training and a certified operator shall be on -site and available during all periods of operation. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5- 402(1) of the Regulations] (7) The Permittee shall, under no circumstances, fire any plastics containing poly vinyl chlorides (PVCs), caskets made predominantly of fiberglass and/or plastic, household wastes, trash or other solid wastes in the cremation unit. Failure to comply with this condition shall be grounds for revocation of this Permit. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5-241(1) of the Regulations] (8) The Permittee shall ensure that the last combustion chamber or zone of the cremation unit is preheated to a temperature of at least 1,600°F prior to introduction of the charge and shall maintain said temperature throughout the remainder of the cremation unit's operation cycle. All elements of the cremation unit shall be maintained in good working order at all times. The cremation unit shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's operation and maintenance recommendations. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5-231(2)(c) of the Regulations] (9) The Permittee shall only introduce and charge human and/or animal remains in the crematory unit along with an associated container designed for cremations. Under no circumstances shall the Permittee fire wooden caskets in the crematory unit without prior written approval of the Agency. Approval shall be contingent on the Permittee submitting valid stack emission test data that demonstrates the respective crematory unit make and model complies with the particulate matter emission limit of this Permit while burning a standard charge that includes a wooden casket. Failure to comply with this condition shall be grounds for revocation of this Permit. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] (10) The Permittee shall have the crematory unit inspected and maintained by the manufacturer or a qualified service representative annually or after every twenty-five (25) operational cycles, whichever occurs later. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] 1§5-405(1) of the Regulations] - Emission Limitations - (11) The Permittee shall not emit, from the cremation unit, any gases that contain particulate matter in excess of 0.06 grains per dry standard cubic foot, corrected to seven (7) percent oxygen. All sampling runs conducted as part of emission tests intended to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits specified above shall begin when waste material is first introduced into the cremation unit. Any emission testing conducted to demonstrate compliance with the above emission limit shall be performed in accordance with Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 5 or an equivalent method approved in writing by the Agency. [§§5-231(2)(c) and 5-404 of the Regulations] Page 7 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 (12) Visible Emissions [Facility Widel Emissions of visible air contaminants from any installation at the Facility, except where otherwise noted in this Permit, shall not exceed twenty (20) percent opacity for more than a period or periods aggregating six (6) minutes in any hour and at no time shall visible emissions exceed sixty (60) percent opacity. Any emission testing conducted to demonstrate compliance with the above emission limits shall be performed in accordance with the proposed Federal Reference Method F- 1 contained in the Federal Register Vol.51, No.168, pp. 31076-31081, August 29, 1986 or an equivalent method approved in writing by the Agency. [§§5-211(2), 5-211(3) and 5-404 of the Regulations] (13) Nuisance and Odor: The Permittee shall not discharge, cause, suffer, allow, or permit from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which will cause injury, detriment, nuisance or annoyance to any considerable number of people or to the public or which endangers the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public or which causes or has a natural tendency to cause injury or damage to business or property. The Permittee shall not discharge, cause, suffer, allow, or permit any emissions of objectionable odors beyond the property line of the premises. [§5-241(1) and (2) of the Regulations] (14) Operation and Maintenance Plan: The Permittee shall develop and implement an operation and maintenance plan (O&M Plan) for the crematory unit within thirty (30) days following commencement of operation of the unit. The purpose of said O&M Plan shall be to ensure the proper operation and maintenance of the unit in order to ensure continuous compliance with the respective conditions and emission limits of this Permit. The O&M Plan shall include, but not be limited to, a detailed description of proper operating procedures, provisions for maintaining records of daily and routine maintenance inspections, findings of those inspections, and any corrective actions taken. Said O&M Plan shall be present at the facility at all times and shall be made available to representatives of the Agency upon request. The Permittee shall revise said O&M Plan at the Agency's request or on its own motion based on operating experience or to reflect equipment or operational changes. [10 v.s.A. §556(c)] [§5-405(1) of the Regulations] - Record Keeping and Reporting - (15) Records of natural gas Use: The Permittee shall maintain records of the total quantity of natural gas consumed in the combustion equipment, in cubic feet, each calendar year. At the beginning of each calendar year, the Permittee shall calculate the total quantity of natural gas consumed in the combustion equipment, in cubic feet, during the previous calendar year. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5-405(1) of the Regulations] (16) Records of Usage: The Permittee shall maintain an operator's log book to record the following information: operators' name, date, start and stop time of each charge, approximate weight of each charge including casket if present, casket description if present (wood, cardboard, crematory friendly casket designed for cremation use, approximate weight) and initial temperature of last combustion zone before charging. A separate section of the log book will also be maintained containing records of material Page 8 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC "AP-1 1-033 safety data sheets (MSDSs) on any plastics fired within the cremation units. Said log book shall be present at the Facility at all times and shall be made available to representatives of the Agency upon request. [§5-402(1) of the Regulations] (17) All records shall be retained for a minimum period of five (5) years from the date of record and shall be made available to the Agency upon request. [§§5-402(1), 5-405(1) of the Regulations] (18) The Permittee shall notify the Agency in writing within ten (10) days of any violation, of which it is aware, of any requirements of this Permit. This notification shall include, at a minimum, the cause for the violation and corrective action or preventative maintenance taken to correct the violation. [§5-402(1) of the Regulations] (19) If requested by the Agency, the Permittee shall notify the Agency at least one (1) day in advance of all scheduled cremations for a specified period of time. [§5-402(1) of the Regulations] (20) The Permittee shall notify the Agency in writing of the date of initial start-up of the crematory within fifteen (15) days after such date. [§5-402(1) of the Regulations] (21) The Permittee shall notify the Agency in writing of any proposed physical or operational change at the Facility which may increase the emission rate of any air contaminant to the ambient air regardless of any concurrent emission reductions that may be achieved. This notification requirement includes, but is not limited to, the proposed installation of any new equipment that is a source of air pollution, including the replacement of an existing permitted air pollution source. If the Agency determines that a permit amendment is required, a new application and the appropriate application fee shall be submitted. The permit amendment shall be obtained prior to commencing any such change except as may otherwise be allowed by the Regulations. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§§5-402(1) and 5-501 of the Regulations] (22) Annual Registration: The Permittee shall calculate the quantity of emissions of air contaminants from the Facility annually. While a crematory unit operated in compliance with this Permit would not be expected to generate emissions in excess of five (5) tons per year, if the Facility does emit more than five (5) tons of any and all air contaminants per year, the Permittee shall register the source with the Secretary of the Agency (hereinafter "Secretary"), and shall renew such registration annually. Each day of operating a source which is subject to registration without a valid, current registration shall constitute a separate violation and subject the Permittee to civil penalties. The registration process shall follow the procedures set forth in Subchapter VIII of the Regulations, including the payment of the annual registration fee on or before May 15 of each year. [Subchapter VIII §§5-802, 5-803, 5-807, 5-808 of the Regulations] Page 9 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #AP-11-033 (23) All records, reports, and notifications that are required to be submitted to the Agency by this Permit shall be submitted to: Agency of Natural Resources Air Pollution Control Division 103 South Main Street, Bldg 3 South Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0402. [§5-402(1) of the Regulations] - Standard Permit Conditions - (24) At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners and operators shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate any affected facility including associated air pollution control equipment in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether acceptable operating and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to the Agency which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, opacity observations, review of operating and maintenance procedures, and inspection of the source. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] (25) Approval to construct or modify under this Permit shall become invalid if construction or modification is not commenced within eighteen (18) months after issuance of this Permit, if construction or modification is discontinued for a period of eighteen (18) months or more, or if construction is not substantially completed within a reasonable time. The Agency may extend any one of these periods upon a satisfactory showing that an extension is justified. The term "commence" as applied to the proposed construction or modification of a source means that the Permittee either has: (a) Begun, or caused to begin, a continuous program of actual on -site construction or modification of the source, to be completed within a reasonable time; or (b) Entered into binding agreements or contractual obligations, which cannot be cancelled or modified without substantial loss to the Permittee, to undertake a continuous program of actual on -site construction or modification of the source to be completed within a reasonable time. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5-501 of the Regulations] Page 10 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC "AP-1 1-033 (26) These Permit conditions may be suspended, terminated, modified, or revoked for cause and reissued upon the filing of a written request with the Secretary of the Agency (hereinafter "Secretary") or upon the Secretary's own motion. Any modification shall be granted only with the written approval of the Secretary. If the Secretary finds that modification is appropriate, only the conditions subject to modification shall be re- opened. The filing of a request for modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or of a notification of planned changes or anticipated non-compliance does not stay any terms or conditions of this Permit. The Secretary may provide opportunity for public comment on any proposed modification of these conditions. If public comments are solicited, the Secretary shall follow the procedures set forth in 10 V.S.A. §556 and §556a, as amended. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] (27) The Permittee shall furnish to the Agency, within a reasonable time, any information that the Agency may request in writing to determine whether cause exists to modify, revoke, reissue, or terminate the Permit or to determine compliance with this Permit. Upon request, the Permittee shall also furnish to the Agency copies of records required to be kept by this Permit. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5-402(1) of the Regulations] (28) By acceptance of this Permit, the Permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the properties covered by the Permit, at reasonable times, to ascertain compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations and with this Permit. The Permittee also agrees to give the Agency access to review and copy any records required to be maintained by this Permit, and to sample or monitor at reasonable times to ascertain compliance with this Permit. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [ §§5-402(1) and 5-404 of the Regulations] (29) All data, plans, specifications, analyses and other information submitted or caused to be submitted to the Agency as part of the application for this Permit or an amendment to this Permit shall be complete and truthful and, for Title V permit applications, certified by a responsible official whose designation has been approved by the Secretary. Any such submission which is false or misleading shall be sufficient grounds for denial or revocation of this Permit, and may result in a fine and/or imprisonment under the authority of Vermont statutes. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] [§5-505 of the Regulations] (30) For the purpose of establishing whether or not a person has violated or is in violation of any condition of this Permit, nothing in this Permit shall preclude the use, including the exclusive use, of any credible evidence or information relevant to whether a source would have been in compliance with applicable requirements if the appropriate performance or compliance test or procedure had been performed. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] (31) Any permit noncompliance could constitute a violation of the federal Clean Air Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or for denial of a permit renewal application. (10 V.S.A. §556(c)) (32) It shall not be a defense for the Permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity to maintain compliance with the conditions of this Permit. [10 V.S.A. §556(c)] Page 11 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC "AP-1 1-033 (33) No person shall build, erect, install or use any article, machine, equipment or other contrivances, the use of which, without resulting in a reduction in the total release of air contaminants to the atmosphere, reduces or conceals an emission which otherwise would constitute a violation of these Regulations. ]§5-403 of the Regulations] (34) The provisions of this Permit are severable. If any provision of this Permit, or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity shall not apply to any other portion of this Permit which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application thereof. po V.S.A. §556(c)] (35) This Permit does not convey any property rights of any sort or any exclusive privilege, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights. Ito V.S.A. §556(c)] (36) All subsequent owners and/or operators of this Facility must request an amendment and transfer of this Permit prior to commencing any operations covered by this Permit. All subsequent owners and/or operators shall submit to the Agency as part of the request for amendment all such information the Agency deems necessary to establish legal ownership and/or interest in the property and all such information the Agency deems necessary to ensure the new owners and/or operators will construct and operate the Facility in compliance with the Regulations and this Permit. The terms and conditions of this Permit shall remain in full force and effect after submittal of the request for amendment and until the issuance of an amended Permit or denial. Should the Secretary deny the request, the new owner and/or operator must take whatever action is necessary to comply with the denial. [10 V S.A. §556(c)] [§§5-501 of the Regulations] (37) Renewable Energy Projects — Right to Appeal to Public Service Board. If this decision relates to a renewable energy plant for which a certificate of public good is required under 30 V.S.A. §248, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the Vermont Public Service Board pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §8506. This section does not apply to a facility that is subject to 10 V.S.A. §1004 (dams before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission), 10 V.S.A. §1006 (certification of hydroelectric projects) or 10 V.S.A. Chapter 43 (dams). Any appeal under this section must be filed with the Clerk of the Public Service Board within 30 days of the date of this decision; the appellant must file with the Clerk an original and six copies of its appeal. The appellant shall provide notice of the filing of an appeal in accordance with 10 V.S.A. 8504(c)(2), and shall also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal on the Vermont Department of Public Service. For further information, see the Rules and General Orders of the Public Service Board, available on line at www.psb.vermont.gov. The address for the Public Service Board is 112 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont, 05620-2701 (Tel. # 802-828-2358). Page 12 of 13 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC #A P-11-033 (38) All Other Projects — Right to Appeal to Environmental Court. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vermontjudiciary.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-828- 1660). (39) The conditions of this Permit as set forth above supercede all conditions contained in all prior Permits issued by the Agency to the Permittee for this Facility. j10 V.S.A. §556(c)j The Agency's issuance of this Air Pollution other information supplied by the Permitt contaminant source approved herein will supplied to the source Permittee. It is th source in accordance with the condition standards and regulations. Dated this day of Agency of Natural Resources David K. Mears, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation Richard A. Valentinetti, Director Air Pollution Control Division e Control Permit relies upon the data, judgment, and e. The Agency makes no assurances that the air meet performance objectives or vendor guarantees e sole responsibility of the Permittee to operate the s herein and with all applicable state and federal jh A2 Gregory Cremation and Memorial Service, LLC — South Burlington Page 13 of 13 South Burlington Planning & Zoning South Burlington Development Review Board Tuesday, November 15, 2011 From: Mark Abrams - 658-8506 IN RE: Agenda item #3 - Reconsideration of conditional use application #CU-11-02 and site plan application #SP-11-14 of O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC for 5,000 sq. ft. of funeral home and mortuary use (crematorium) in unit #7, 472 Meadowland Drive. A — Extending Hours The Dev. Review Board, after consideration of proposed facility's closeness to neighborhoods, potential health concerns, and community input, stipulated the condition (AA&A.5) that it not operate on the weekends, and for no more than 8 consecutive hours per day and 40 hours per week. Due to VT State Law requiring at least 24 hrs. before cremation, the applicant's consulting engineers' letter to the Board of 9/27/11 requesting reconsideration of this condition points out that "The funeral service business entails unscheduled needs of customers.." and not being able to operate on weekends — incidentally when the concentration of adjacent homeowners and their families will be much higher - will create "serviceability issues for the business," and "put stress on the families that it serves." In light of this, it would seem that provision of cremation services is incompatible with this location, and more suited to one further from residential neighborhoods. B - Engineering Consultant Stipulations for Safe Operation The City, acknowledging its unfamiliarity with crematoria and the question of airborne toxins and particulate, sought and relied upon " the independent technical review of a third -party consultant" — Stantec Consulting Engineers. The central finding of their report is that the proposed equipment's ability to avoid release of smoke, odor, mercury and particulate dust depends on a number of conditions, none of which the DRB has required, and logically should. Stantec states: .."Operation of the proposed unit will be in compliance with "Vt. Air Pollution Control Division (APCD) standards .."provided (emphasis added) that the applicant's operator is trained properly to ensure the manufacturer's recommendations .. are followed. Additionally, the operator should attend annual training to ensure new developments are incorporated.." Stantec states further that ongoing monitoring of the unit's multiple safeguards is critical to avoiding in pollution release (pgs.3,4). Given the central role of the consultant's report in the Board's decision to approve this business, it seems only sensible that, to ensure reliability, and minimal risk of smoke, odor or particulate pollution, such approval require- 1 - Ongoing training of personnel, as specified in the engineering report. 2 - Meaningful regular inspection of the sophisticated pollution monitoring systems themselves, whose effectiveness is dependent on their reliability. 3 - Some form of oversight/accountability to ensure that these standards are met. Respectfully submitted, Mark R. Abrams The Other Pape"r • www.otherpapen Class*ifi d's, AFFORDABLE LOVES SENIOR CARE DAYCARE APARTMENTS Let us help you live more South Nid of Burlington Pines Senior Living independently in your home. We are Registered daycare has full time Community inSouth Burlington caregivers who=support abetter openings for achild two and over. offers I & 2 bedroom apartments. quality of life, and peace of mind, by Fun and loving environment with Rent includes all utilities. providing transportation for events experienced provider. Lots of - Optional living and health services.g and appointments, runnin errands, activities and outdoor time. Community tour doing household chores,. organizing, Please call Ann at 999-3360, every Wednesday shopping and meal prep, medication at 123(l p.m. prep and reminders, exercise, pets : NEAT &CLEAN �4 a (; 865-1109 and plant care, and much more. t Whether you need I hour or 4, or all 5; Residential Cleaning, Weekh, day, we'll be there to help. Versed in Bi-Weekly, Monthly. Call Janc at R PUBLICNOTICE dementia and Alzheimer's care 355-2555 for at) estimate. 5. Call Roxanne and Ray 657-3357, v PUBLIC HEARING 881 1188, 373 2195 .lent condition. $50.274-2087 (10/13) " S: SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW< * u ., .,..' ••....' F. ,.y,.., r •„. BOARD - FOUND ` : Downhill Ski's Mono Block 51mbs ITEMS: lvis �1 The South Burlington Development -Review Light speed core technology Elan. Used I, 2; Board will hold a public hearing.,in the South SMALL, YOUNG, FEMALE CAT near season with bindings. $75;Hess toy trucks. 22 years old (never out of box. $25 each; S. Dorsetgton Street ty Hall Conference Room, 575 South Burlington, Vermont on Kennedy Drive/WilIistonRoad, SB. Please W,00den,handmadecarsandairplanes.$45 B November 15, 2011 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the describe; leave message. 864-3623 (10/ 13) each; :Singer sewing machine in cabinet : y, following: made by General. Motors foot and.knee WANTED pedal, works very good. $150; Radio in -Sl 1) Preliminary & final plat application #SD-11-38 stand-up. cabinet works with tubes, about ov of Antonio B. Pomerleau, LLC to: (1) remove the GARAGE SPACE for winte r car storage. 777- 60 years old. Sound comes out. $125.881- $; planned -unit designation for the two (2) lots at 1956 (10/13) 1708 (10/13) 1519-1525 Shelburne Road & 5 Bartlett Bay Road, Sl and 2) subdivide the 1.91 acre parcel developed DRIVER NEEDED: Denver, Colorado to ENTERTAINMENT CENTER: Solid oak with 5( With two (2)`commercial buildings into two (2) ' South Burlington. Will pay gas for some- lots of storage. 53 inches high, 53' inches lots of 0.92 acres (lot #21 and 0.99 acres (lot #3), one to drive Honda CRV to S. Burlington. wide and 20 inches deep. 29w x 26h TV and 3) increase the size of lot #1 from 4.65 acres `. Depart DenveranytimeafterDecember6�'. opening. Four shelves.on left side for ste- of to 4.73 acres, 1519 & 1525 Shelburne Road & 5 Deliver cat 'to SB by December 23�d, 2011. reo,/other equipment (three of the shelves ' ll� Bartlett Bay Road. - 660-3136 (10/13) are inside class doors).. On bottom there 2) Reconsideration of conditional use applica- ration of conditional DIGITAL SLR camera for photo work on are two enclosed areas for great storage On .wheels. Originally purchased at Modern r 2, doneconid- ands, LLCfor om 5,00o sq. ft. of funeral home and mortuary use Green Up 365 environmental stewardship. Design: $75.863-3395 (10/13) (crematorium) in unit 472 mortua land and community service project. Contact by. email only please: FLTIZNfT[JRE:45"squareglasstop/metaldin- Drive. , litterwithastorytotell@yahoo.com. ing table and 6 chairs plus serving table (di- 3) Final plat application #SD-11-39 of Sphinx Development, LLC for a planned unit develop- WINTER STORAGE for my car from No= mensions33"I.,17"W,36"M.$1,000;2break- fast bar chairs, 41 " tall. $106.863-7096 (10/13) _ H, ment consisting of: 1) razing an existing single vembertomid-Apri1.864-7227'(10/13) w family dwelling and an existing two (2) family GUMBALL'MACHINE: 5' tall. $225 firm. le dwelling, 2) merging a 1.31 acre parcel and a 2.33 WORK: 18-year-old boy looking for odd ' 999-9029 (10/27) . tr; acre parcel into a 3.64 acre parcel; and 4) con- jobs. --Lawn mowing, leaf raking, gutter n( structinga40,261sq:'ft.bui[ding tocontainequal cleaning,etc.You can reachme•at881-2541. MA27RFSS.Wand new Sh=onsBeautyrest at parts general office use and medical office use, ' (10/13) mattress; double -bed, firm mattress with re 1060 & 1070-1080 Hinesburg Road. pillow top. Extremely comfy, firm support. A/ FREE Paid $900, asking $450. See it at Sears (model: fr( Mark Behr, Chairman "Copacabana").. 272-7443 (10/27) wi South Burlington Development Review Board FREE CAT: To a great home. Loving, gentle,PSA $1 Copies Copies of the applications are available for pub- 4 pound, black and brown stripped_female vIanc SAT, SAT Subject -Tests, ACT,_ Ad - vane-d infpection at the South Burlington City all. stray. Perhaps 3-4years old.Verysmart and trainable. Great mouser and keeps the k. Alsovail- o markings,apractice on book. 'able —no, markings made on book. Also m m October 27, 2011 squirrels from the bird feeder. -Happy out- brand new Singapore textbooks on math tir doors or in. She will take a walk with you. Will get along with other social cats and doesn't seem to mind dogs. I would keep CLASSIFIED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED MOTOR VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC REGULATION _ -- her but my14yearoldcatsaysno. Contact me at bakhshil3@gmail.com. (10113) N A service forSouth $urli ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Please Check Or CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON - - - FOR SALE - n rrnc AA- A.J. L--...... I Meadowlands Business Complex 472 Meadowland Drive Tax Map Parcel 1705-00107 Abutting Landowner List Northeast Territories, Inc. 20 South Crest Drive Burlington, VT 05401 Tax Map John Larkin, Inc. 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0575-000340257-00039 Scott L. & Roberta S. Pennington 26 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00026 Larry W. & Ginette D. Brainard 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00028 Munson Earth Moving Corp. 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 Tax Map 1155-00284 Grandview Farm Inc. P.O. Box 1304 Burlington, VT 05402-1304 Tax Map 0860-01150 Greenfield Capital, LLC 35 Thompson Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1715-00035 Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 Tax Map 1705-00125 (All under 0860-01150) Northeast Territories, Inc. 20 South Crest Drive Burlington, VT 05401 John Larkin, Inc. 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Scott L. & Roberta S. Pennington 26 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Larry W. & Ginette D. Brainard 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Larry W. & Ginette D. Brainard 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Munson Earth Moving Corp. 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 Grandview Farm Inc. P.O. Box 1304 Burlington, VT 05402-1304 Greenfield Capital, LLC 35 Thompson Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 unia tot i uin pian moving ahead Proposal attracts little opposition By John Briggs Free Press Staff Writer . A proposed 5,000-square- foot crematorium on Mead- owlands Drive in South Bur- lington is moving ahead. O'Brien Brothers Partner- ship on Williston Road ap- plied in April to add the cre- matorium to the 60,000- square-foot building at 472 Meadowlands Drive in an "industrial open space" zon- ing district east of Hines- burg Road and across the street from the Butler Farms housing development. The Development Re- view Board approved the ap- plication 6-0 Aug. 31, and the 30-day period in which an appeal can be made is nearly over. Mark Abrams, who lives nearby on Highland Terrace, has reservations about hav- ing a crematorium so close to a residential neighbor- hood, .calling it a threat to livability. He is concerned about mercury emissions (coming from the combus- tion at high temperatures of dental fillings) but says that emotional considerations are also at play in his oppo- sition, including his sense that when the facility opens, its close neighbors would be breathing, "in some degree, particulates of human be- ings." Abrams said the cremato- rium has been discussed on the Front Porch Forum email list, and a petition has been circulated, though as of Tuesday morning it hadn't been forwarded to the city. Eating her greens Abrams said cremation makes sense but feels cre- matoria should be located "well away from immediate human proximity. It may be technically. legal to inflict this on the residents," he wrote in an open letter to the city in late August, "but it is difficult to see how it would not be a violation of livability and neighborly consideration." - The Development Re- view Board held public hear- ings May 17 and July 19. Santac Consulting Serv- ices of Plymouth Meeting, Pa., did an analysis of the likely, emissions from the crematorium. The firm con- cluded with the equipment the crematorium plans to use — a Matthews Power - Pak II system equipped with a smoke and dust -suppress- ing "Smoke -Buster 140," the crematorium wouldn't emit visible smoke or odors. Santac also examined cre- matoria in Sacramento, Calif.; Philadelphia; and South Burlington and con- cluded that mercury emis- sions would not exceed per- missible state levels. "no more than eight consec- utive hours per day during the week" and no weekend operation. Abrams said he is consid- ering appealing the board's decision to the state Envi- ronmental Court. In his Au- gust open letter, he made an- other kind of appeal, asking . "public officials to temper their legal matters with hu- man consideration, common sense, and yes, compassion." Contact John Briggs at 660-1863 or jbriggs@burlingtonfreepress.com. The board - limited the Follow John on *twitter at crematorium's operations to www.twitter.com/jaIbriggs926. «,111 A111a. + Fond memories of iconic Vermont weatherman Free Press reporter Matt Sutkoski writes on his blog, "Weather Rap- port,"a remembrance of WCAX meteorologist Stuart Hall: I can't let this week go by without writing an appreciation of Stu- art Hall. Hall, who died Sun- day, was the weather- man on WCAX-TV from the time the sta- tion went on the air in 1954 until his retirement in 1990. For a huge number of Vermonters, Hall was the steadfast, calm and the sign would be cov- ered with snow. I'd al- ways pray he'd push that snow sign right over Vermont, meaning the next day would bring a fun -filled time of sledding and snowball fights. I'd always trust Hall to deliver — and he always did. I think he felt the same as I did about snow. On the day of his retirement, when asked what kind of weather he'd like to be, Hall said, "I know what I'd be. A nice northeast storm with a lot of snow." MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Develop t Review Board FROM. Cathyann LaRose, AICP RE: Reconsideration of Conditional Use application #CU-11-02 and site plan application #SP-11-14 DATE: November 8, 2011 Reconsideration of conditional use application #CU-11-02 and site plan application #SP-11-14 of O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC for 5,000 sq. ft. of funeral home and mortuary use (crematorium) in unit #7, 472 Meadowland Drive. The Development Review Board approved the applications with conditions on August 31, 2011 (decision attached) after meetings on May 17 and July 19, 2011 (meeting minutes attached). The applicant requested a re -consideration of the decision, which the Board granted on October 4, 2011. A letter from the applicant outlining those items which they seek to have reconsidered is attached. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com LOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT September 27, 2011 South Burlington DRB 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear South Burlington Design Review Board, Thank you for considering and approving Conditional Use Application #CU-11-02, the proposed crematorium at 472 Meadowland Drive. Stephen Gregory is eager to faithfully follow the conditions imposed by the DRB on behalf of the community and has asked O'Brien Brothers, the current owner of the unit, to seek clarification and a slight revision of one of the conditions. We would respectfully request further clarification and reconsideration regarding condition # 4 which currently reads; "The crematorium shall operate no more than eight (8) consecutive hours per day during the week and shall not operate on the weekends. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall provide the Administrative Officer in writing the hours of operation chosen for operation." Clarification Requested Please clarify that the 8 hours/day limitation pertains only to operation of the Power -Pak II cremation machine. In a recent conversation with [Ray Belair], he stated that he believed that the DRB intended to limit the operation of the cremation machine and that you did not mean to restrict other activities on the premises, such as administrative duties, memorial services, and meeting with families, any of which may need to happen after traditional business hours from time to time. The proposed new language below would clarify this by substituting the word "crematorium" with "Matthews Power -Pak II". Reconsideration Requested At our public meetings on this matter there was a lot of time spent on potential health issues and other concerns of residents, which left very little time to discuss the practicalities of the proposed condition #4. We accept the 40 hour per week limitation placed by the DRB, which provides enough cremation time for our projected level of business, but which if kept in a strict "weekdays only" without flexibility will greatly diminish the ability to serve customers due to some technical rules of which the DRB may not have been aware. Vermont State law requires a 24-hour waiting period before a person can be cremated. Under current condition #4, anyone that passes away late Thursday afternoon would not be able to be cremated until Monday morning. This not only creates potential serviceability issues for the business, but also puts stress on the families that it serves. In this instance, families will have two options: 1) hold the deceased until Monday morning for closure, or 2) use the other crematory in South Burlington, which operates without restrictions (time or capacity). In order to provide great service and not burden the families that he works with, he would like the ability to cremate on the weekends if required. SERVING OUR COMMUNITY'S REAL ESTATE NEEDS SINCE 1 9 5 8 aMmIr, 1855 Williston Road • PO Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 • 802.658.5000 • fax 658.5002 obrienbroth ersagency.com Finally, condition #4 suggests that the machine must be operated within a pre -specified consecutive 8-hour period Again, Mr, Gregory accepts the 8-hour daily limitation in total but notes that, while he expects to largely run the machine during normal business hours, there may be instances that family needs make running the machine without any interruption highly impractical The funeral services business entails unscheduled needs of customers that can arise at any time of day, potentially requiring him to be out of the building during the business hours. Our proposed language allows him to "catch up" any such lost hours so that he can service his customers while living within the 40 hour per week in total limitation Our request would change condition #4 to the following: "The Matthews Power -Pak 11 shall operate no more than eight (8) hours per day, nor more than forty (40) total hours per week. It shall not operate on the weekends unless required by the customers or state regulations. When weekend operation is necessary, time will be deducted from the following week." For example: If operation of the Power -Pak ff is required on a Saturday for four (4) hours, the total remaining hours for the following Sunday -Friday will not exceed 36 hours. Again, thank you for this reconsideration. We would also like to reserve the right to ask you to re- examine capacity and hour limitation at a later date if client needs grow beyond our current expectations. Respectfully, IYV4 Scott Homsted, P.E. Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc, 1855 Williston Road, PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT, 05407 cc: Ray Belair CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING O'BRIEN MEADOWLANDS, LLC — 472 MEADOWLANDS DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION #CU-11-02 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-11-14 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION O'Brien Meadowlands LLC is seeking conditional use approval for 5,000 sq. ft. of funeral home and mortuary use (crematorium) in unit #7, 472 Meadowland Drive. The applicant is also seeking site plan approval to amend a previously approved plan for a 60,000 sq. ft. multi -tenant industrial building. The amendment consists of occupying vacant space (unit #7) with 5,000 sq. ft. of funeral home and mortuary use (crematorium), 472 Meadowland Drive. The Board held public hearings on this application on May 17, & July 19, 2011. Scott Homsted represented the applicant. Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans ands supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board, finds, concludes, and decides the following: 1. O'Brien Meadowlands LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking conditional use approval for 5,000 sq. ft. of a crematorium in unit #7, 472 Meadowland Drive. The applicant is also seeking site plan approval to amend a previously approved plan to amend a previously approved plan for a 60,000 sq. ft. multi -tenant industrial building. The amendment consists of occupying vacant space (unit #7) with 5,000 sq. ft. of a cremato Drive. rium use, 472 Meadowland 2. The owner of record of the subject property is O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC. 3. The application was received on April 11, 2011. 4. The application was reviewed on May 17, 2011 and continued through several meetings so that the Development Review Board could solicit a third -party technical review of the emissions data submitted by the applicant. The Board closed the hearing on July 19, 2011. 5. The subject property is located in the Industrial Open Space Zoning District. 6. The plans submitted consist of a plan entitled " Site Plan Meadowlands Business Complex Lot 2 Meadowland Industrial Park 472 Meadowland Drive South Burlington, Vermont"", prepared by #CU-11-02 & #SP-11-14 Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated May 3, 2006, last revised on 4/8/11. 7. While the SBLDR do not specifically list crematoriums among conditional uses allowed in the IOS zoning district, the DRB finds such use closely approximates the funeral home and mortuary use listed and will be reviewed under the same. In so doing, the DRB recognizes that under the SBLDR "the DRB may attach such additional reasonable conditions and safeguards as it may deem necessary to implement the purposes of these Land Development Regulations." ( Article 2) 8. The additional conditions on operations set forth below are based on the concerns raised through testimony and submissions regarding potential harm from mercury emissions and changes to the character of the neighborhood. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Section 14.01 of the Land Development Regulations, Site Plan and Conditional Use Review, General Purpose, states the following: "The site plan review process and the conditional use review process will allow the City of South Burlington to review the arrangement, layout, use interrelationships and neighborhood impacts of sites intended for development or redevelopment and to ensure the aesthetic quality of such design to coTTform to the character of the neighborhood and the goals of the comprehensive plan." shall meet the following standards: The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. The South Burlington Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Industrial Open Space Zoning District: "was intended originally to provide land for high -quality, large -lot industries and offices whose buildings and operations are consistent with a location in an environmentally healthy and visually sensitive area adjacent to residential neighborhoods.Recently, ther have been significant concerns about the suitability of this district f..or warehousing, e particularly in areas adjacent to existing residential neighborhoods. While this area is close to the Airport and the planned highway interchange at Route 116 and I-89, the noise and visual impacts associated with truck traffic are potentially very disruptive to residential neighborhoods. This issue has been discussed during the SEQ Concept Plan; among the ideas evaluated were the creation of a warehousing sub -district adjacent to the Interstate. In any case, there was strong consensus that the zoning regulations for the IO district regarding warehousing should be re-evaluated. " While the language from the Comprehensive Plan calls out warehousing uses specifically, the Board finds that the general view of the IO district as identified in the Comprehensive Plan, approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council, is that the area remains a viable location for industrial uses, provided that such uses are sensitive to the surrounding residential neighborhoods in terms of noise and visual impacts. The Comp plan goes on to list recommendations for the area, including: 3.3Continue to limit uses in the Industrial -Open Space District to clean, high quality light manufacturing, research and testing, and office uses, and take steps through zoning and development review to limit potential adverse impacts on adjacent natural areas and residential neighborhoods. 2 #CU-11-02 & #SP-11-14 3.4 Revise the LDRs to ensure that all truck -intensive uses in the 10 district are located a sufficient distance away from residentially -zoned lands to prevent adverse noise, air quality, light, and visual impacts. The Board will consider any potential adverse impacts related to noise, air quality, light, and visual impacts and whether these are consistent with the above statement. The Board will also consider the performance standards in this review. Appendix A of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations dictates: A.1 Fire and Explosion Hazards (a) All activities involving storage of flammable and explosive materials shall be provided with adequate safety and fire- fighting devices in accordance with all applicable state and local laws and regulations. (b) Burning of waste materials in open fires is prohibited. With respect to fire and explosion hazards, the Board finds that the applicant Meets criteria in Appendix A, Performance Standards A.1, Fire and Explosion hazards. The application does not involve the storage of flammable and explosive material. A.2 Vibration (a) No vibration shall be produced which is transmitted through the ground and is discernible without the aid of instrument at or beyond the lot lines, nor shall any vibration produced exceed 0.002g peak at up to 60 cps frequency, measured at or beyond the lot lines using either seismic or electronic vibration measuring equipment. (b) Vibrations occurring at higher than 50 cps frequency or random vibrations shall not induce accelerations exceeding .001g. Single impulse random vibrations occurring at an average interval greater than S minutes shall not induce accelerations exceeding .01g. With respect to vibration standards, the Board finds that the applicant meets criteria in Appendix A, Performance Standards A.2. No measureable vibrations will be transmitted beyond lot lines. A3 Noise (a) The following acts are declared to be loud, disturbing and unnecessary noises and shall be deemed detrimental to the health and safety of the residents of the City of South Burlington: (1) Defect in vehicle or operation of vehicle The operation of any automobile or motorcycle in such a manner as to create squealing, or squealing of tires, or loud and unnecessary grating, grinding, exploding -type, rattling, or other noises. (ii) Loudspeakers, amplifiers for advertising. The using, operating or permitting to be played, used or operated of any radio receiving set, musical instrument, phonograph, loudspeaker sound amplifier, or other machine or device for the producing or reproducing of sound which is cast upon the public streets for the purpose of commercial advertising or attracting the attention of the public. (iii) Horns, signaling devices etc The sounding of any horn or signal on any automobile, motorcycle or other vehicle except as a danger warning; the creation, by means of any other signaling device, of any unreasonable loud or harsh sound; and the sounding of any such device for unnecessary and/or unreasonable periods of time. iv Radios hono ra hs etc. The using, operating or permitting to be played, used or operated of any radio or television receiving set, musical instrument, phonograph, or other machine or device for producing or reproducing of sounds in such a manner as to disturb thepeace, quiet and comfort of the neighboring inhabitants or any time #CU-11-02 & #SP-11-14 with louder volume than is necessaryfor convenient hearing for theperson orpersons who are in the room, vehicle or chamber in which such a machine or device is operated and who are voluntary listeners thereto. 62, Exhaust. The discharge into the open air of the exhaust of any steam engine, internal combustion engine, motor boat, or motor vehicle, except through a muffler or other device which will effectively prevent loud or explosive noises therefrom. (vi) Noise in general. Any noise which is deemed objectionable because of volume, frequency or beat and is not muffled or otherwise controlled. (b) Specific Standards (i) The creation of, permitting or operation of any of the above sets, instruments, devices or vehicles causing said noise in such a manner as to be plainly audible at a distance of fifty feet (50 ) from the building, structure or vehicle from which noise emanates shall be prima facie evidence of a nuisance and a violation of these Regulations. 00 It shall be a violation of these Regulations for any property owner to create or allow the creation of noise in excess of the following stated limits in the City during the hours of 12: 00 AM and 8: 00 AM: a. 45 dBA based on a one -hour average measured at any point where the property on which the noise emanates adjoins any property used for residential purposes. b. 60 dBA based on a one -hour average measured at any point where the property on which the noise emanates adjoins any property used for commercial purposes. (iii) For purposes of this Appendix, the following terms shall be defined as stated below: a. Decibel — a unit measure of sound level. b. Sound level — in decibels measured by a sound meter, by using the `A "frequency weighing, expressed in dBA. c. Average sound level — a sound level during a given period of time (e.g. one hour) found by the general rule of combination of sound levels. Also called "equivalent sound level. " (c) Exemption (i) Speakers, sound trucks, amplifiers, etc. used for commercial purposes as advertising for which a proper permit has been issued are specifically exempt from the provisions of these Regulations. (ii) Emergency vehicles operated by fire, rescue and police agencies are specifically exempt from the provisions of these Regulations. (iii) Temporary actions benefiting the public, including but not limited to roadway construction, sewer and water line construction, and special public events, are specifically exempt from the provisions of these Regulations upon approval of such an exemption by the City Manager. (d) Sound Measurement Standards. Sound shall be measured in accordance with the standards specified by the American National Standards Institute. With respect to noise, the Board fmds that the applicant meets criteria in Appendix A, Performance Standards A.3, Noise. Decibel levels are below 45 DBA, based on a one -hour measurement to residential properties, and below 60 DBA, based on a one -hour measurement to commercial properties. A.4 Air Pollution (a) Visible emissions. There shall not be discharged into the atmosphere from any source at any time any air pollutant in excess of specified darkness standards (No. I on the Ringlemann Chart, except under specified conditions contained within airpollution standards). This shall include emissions of airpollutants ofsuch capacity as to obscure an observer's view to a degree equal to or greater than the above visible emission standard. Visible emission of any kind at ground level past the lot line of the property on which the source of the emissions is located are prohibited. 4 #CU-11-02 & #SP-11-14 (b) Pollutants. All discharge or emission ofpotentially dangerous or offensive elements into the air shall be subject to the requirements of all applicable local, state, and federal regulations. With respect to air pollution, the Board finds that the applicant meets criteria with the conditions stated below. Referencing the independent Stantac study of 7/17/2011, "Stantac consulting services (Stantac) feels that the proposed unit can be operated in compliance with performance standards A.4 and A.5 of the South Burlington Land Use Regulations effective March 15, 201 L" Several neighbors provided testimony and submitted information raising concerns in regards to mercury emissions. On page three of the Stantac study, "Review Findings for the Matthews Power -Pak II System", item # 9 states in part: "According to the data retained by the APCD, a single crematorium's mercury emissions would not meet the action level set by the state in terms of lbs of emissions/8hrs of operation", The crematorium shall therefore operate for no more than eight (8) consecutive hours per day during the week and shall not operate on the weekends. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall provide the Administrative Officer in writing, the chosen hours of operation. A.5 Odors (a) No emission shall be permitted of odorous gases or other odorous matter in such quantities as to be readily detected or as to interfere unreasonably with the comfort of the public. (b) Any process which may involve the creation or emission of any odors shall be provided with a secondary safeguard system so that control will be maintained if the primary safeguard system should fail. (c) Table III, Odor Thresholds in Chapter 5 of the Air Pollution Abatement Manual, copyright 1951 by the Manufacturing Chemists 'Association, Inc. or its equivalent shall serve as a guide to determining such quantities of offensive odors. With respect to odors, the Board finds, referencing the independent study by Stantac of 7/15/2011, Page 3, "The operation of the proposed unit will be in compliance with the visible emission and pollution discharge requirements of the Vermont Air Pollution Control Division during its operation. Odors should not be detected beyond the property line." The same condition applies to A.5 as to A.4, that the crematorium shall operated for no more than eight (8) consecutive hours per day during the week and shall not operate on the weekends. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall provide the Administrative Officer in writing, the chosen hours of operation. A.6 Electromagnetic Radiation (a) It shall be unlawful to operate, or cause to be operated, a planned or intentional source of electromagnetic radiation except in compliance with the applicable regulations of the Federal Communications Commission or the Inter -department Radio Advisory Committee regarding such sources of electromagnetic radiation. Said operation shall be unlawful if such radiation causes an abnormal degradation in performance of other electromagnetic radiators or electromagnetic receptors of quality and design because ofproximity, primaryfield, blanketing, spurious re -radiation, harmonic content, modulation or energy conducted by power or telephone lines. (b) The determination of "abnormal degradation in performance" and "of quality andproperty design " shall be made in accordance with good engineering practices as defined in the most current principles and standards of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. A.7 Radioactive Radiation (a) No activities shall be permitted which emit dangerous radioactivity at any point beyond the property line. (b) The handling of radioactive materials, the discharge of such materials into air and water, and the disposal of radioactive 5 #CU-11-02 & #SP-11-14 materials shall be in conformance with all applicable state and federal regulations. With respect to electromagnetic and radioactive radiation, the Board finds that the applicant meets criteria in Appendix A, Performance Standards A.6, and A.7, electromagnetic and radioactive radiation. No measurable radiation will be produced. A.8 Heat (a) For the purposes of these Regulations, heat is defined as thermal energy of a radioactive, conductive, or convective nature. (b) Heat emitted at any or all points shall not at any time cause a temperature increase on any adjacent property, whether such change be in the air or the ground, in a natural stream or lake, or in any structure on such adjacent property. With respect to heat, the Board fmds that the applicant meets criteria in Appendix A, Performance Standards A.8, Heat. The heat emitted will not cause temperatures to rise on adjacent property. A.9 Direct Glare (a) Direct glare is defined for the purposes of these Regulations as illumination within property lines caused by direct or spectrally reflected rays from incandescent, fluorescent, or arc lighting, or from such high temperature processes as welding orpetroleum or metallurgical refining. (b) No such direct glare shall be permitted, except that parking areas and walkways may be illuminated by luminaries so hooded or shielded that the angle of maximum candlepower shall be sixty degrees (60o) drawn perpendicular to the ground. Such luminaries shall be placed not more than thirtyfeet (30 ) above ground level and the maximum illumination at ground level shall not be in excess of an average of three (3) foot candles. A.10 Indirect Glare (a) Indirect glare is defined for the purposes of these Regulations as illumination beyond property lines caused by diffuse reflection from a surface such as a wall or roof of a structure. (b) Indirect glare produced by illumination at ground level shall not exceed 0.3 foot candles maximum, and 0.1 foot candles average. (c) Deliberately induced sky -reflected glare, as by casting a beam upward for advertising purposes, is specifically prohibited. With respect to direct and indirect glare, the Board fmds that the applicant meets criteria in Appendix A, Performance Standards A.9 and A.10, Direct and Indirect Glare. Applicant is in accordance with South Burlington regulations. A.11 Liquid and Solid Wastes No discharge or emission of any potentially dangerous or offensive elements shall be permitted at any point into any sewage disposal system, water supply system, watercourse, or lake, or into the ground or air, except in accord with all applicable local, state and federal regulations. With respect to liquid and solid waste, the Board finds that the applicant meets criteria in section 14.07 Specific Review Standards C, meets disposal of wastes requirements, and also Appendix A, Performance Standards A.11, Liquid and Solid Wastes. No potentially dangerous or offensive elements shall be discharged. A.12 Other Requirements Where the requirements of these performance standards may be replaced by newer standards or may conflict with other local, state or federal statutes or regulations, the stricter standards shall apply. Al #CU-11-02 & #SP-11-14 The applicant submitted testimony which states that there will be very little emissions from the proposed use, which they have stated will be less than other common uses. The Board sought the independent technical review of a third -party consultant. The consultant, Peter R. Charrington, P.E. from Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., reviewed the applicant's submission, as well as the proposed technology for the crematorium. His report is dated July 15, 2011 and is incorporated herein by reference The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located The stated purpose of the district is "to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and Burlington International Airport." The application before the Board is for a proposed change in use. The building is fully approved and permitted, and no site plan changes are requested. The Board fmds that the existing building and layout of the site meets the stated purpose of the district. The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. The Board finds that the proposal will not adversely affect municipal services or educational facilities. Relevant impact fees have already been paid with the construction of the building. (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor ability to develop adjacentpropertyfor appropriate uses. The Board reviewed the statements above with respect to the planned character of the area. The subject property is located in an industrial zone. This industrial zone is located adjacent to a residential neighborhood. A 200 foot buffer is mandatory in the IO zone along the residential zoning district boundary. This buffer was implemented with construction of the building. The Board considered any outward, undue and adverse affects of the proposed use. The Board finds that in order to minimize any adverse impacts to the planned character of neighborhood by introducing incineration (cremation) into the IO district and the surrounding area, the applicant shall adhere to the conditions as outlined in A.4 and A.5 above. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. The proposal will not affect traffic in the vicinity. Traffic studies and impact fees were paid with the subdivision of the greater area, as well as the construction of the building. No new construction is planned and the proposed change in use is not traffic -intensive. (d) Bylaws in effect With respect to the bylaws in effect, the Board finds that the applicant is in compliance with bylaws in effect (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The Board finds that the proposal will not affect renewable energy resources. 7 #CU-11-02 & #SP-11-14 SITE PLAN RE VIE W S TANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following_ general review standards for all site plan Mlications• (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extentpracticable. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable Zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. (f) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements Access/Circulation No new construction is planned as part of this application. As such, the Board finds that the change in use will not affect the site layout or other elements of the site plan. DECISION The South Burlington Development Review Board approves conditional use application #CU-11-02 & site plan application #SP-11-14, subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in full effect. #CU-11-02 & #SP-11-14 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the plans submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3. The crematorium shall be limited to utilizing one (1) Matthews Power -Pak II System unless otherwise approved by the Development Review Board. 4. The crematorium shall operate for no more than eight (8) consecutive hours per day during the week and shall not operate on the weekends. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall provide the Administrative Officer in writing the hours of operation chosen for operation. 5. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 17.04 of the Land Development Regulations or this approval is null and void. 6. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the site modifications. 7. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. Tim Barritt— yea/nay/abstain/not present Mark Behr — yea/nay/abstain/not present Matthew Birmingham — yea/nay/abstain/not present Roger Farley — yea/nay/abstain/not present Joe Randazzo— yea/nay/abstain/not present Michael Sirotkin — yea/nay/abstain/not present Bill Stuono — yea/nay/abstain/not present Motion carried by a vote of 6 — 0 — 0 Signed this 31B` day of August 2011, by Digitally signed by Mark C. Behr Mark C. Behr DN cArchitect Mark C. Behr, o=Richard Henry Behr rchiteR P.C., ou, email=mark@rhbpc.com, c=US Date: 2011.08.31 14:07:55-04'00' Mark Behr, Chairman Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior Court, Environmental Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be mailed to the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4)(A). Please contact the Environmental Division at 802-828-1660 or htti):Hvermontiudici!,Liy.org/GTC/enviromnental/default.aspx for more information on filing requirements, deadlines, fees and mailing address. The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call 802.879.5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 JULY 2011 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 19 July 2011, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: M. Behr, R. Farley, B Stuono, M. Birmingham, M. Sirotkin, T. Barritt, J. Randazzo Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; M. Young, B Bull, J. Leinwohl, B. McEwing, S Homsted, S. Gregory, A. Frank, C. Knowles, G. Strong, C. Berger, S. Katz, B. Alvarez, R. Deslauriers, Sr. and Jr., S McClellan, R. Greco 1. Reorganization al Meeting: Mr. Belair presided over the election of officers. He opened the floor for nominations for Chair. Mr. Farley nominated Mr. Behr. Mr. Birmingham seconded. There were no further nominations. Mr. Belair then asked for nominations for Vice Chair. Mr. Behr nominated Mr. Stuono. Mr. Randazzo seconded. There were no further nominations. Mr. Belair then asked for nominations for Clerk. Mr. Behr nominated Mr. Randazzo, Mr. Stuono seconded. There were no further nominations. Members then elected the full slate of officers by a unanimous vote. 2.Other Business/Announcements: Mr. Belair reminded members that the next meeting will be on 3 August, which is a Wednesday night. 3. Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-11-23 of City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport for a planned unit development to construct a 33,275 sq. ft. building to accommodate the Burlington Aviation Technical Center and the Vermont Flight Academy (personal instruction), Eagle Drive: Mr. Leinwohl advised that they had met with the Public Works Director who felt there is no need for an independent technical review. Members suggested the applicant check with the Rec Path Committee. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 1 of 6 19 JULY 2011 Mr. Young asked if this application will fall under Interim Zoning. Mr. Behr said there is a request for a height waiver, so the applicant will have to go to the City Council. Mr. Belair explained that the DRB functions as it usually does, under the same set of regulations. The City Council deals only with what is specifically affected by Interim Zoning. No other issues were raised. 4. Continued Site Plan Application #SP-11-20 and Design Review Application #DR- 11-06 of Healthy Living Natural Foods Market and Green Mountain Power Corp. to amend a previously approved plan for a 33,733 sq. ft. gfa building with 31,351 sq. ft. (including mezzanine) of retail food establishment use and 2,382 sq. ft. of short-order restaurant use. The amendment consists of: 1) installing a "ChargePoint Electric Vehicle Charging Station," 2) integrating the charging station with a sidewalk surface art form "10 ft. metal tree" and a roof mounted "5 ft. sun," and 3) installing a bicycle fix -it unit, 222 Dorset Street: Mr. Belair said staff has now had time to review the plans and they are fine. Mr. Stuono asked that the bicycle facility be put as far back as possible. Mr. Randazzo moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-11-20 and Design Review Application #DR-11-06 of Healthy Living Natural Foods Market and Green Mountain Power Corp. subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Stuono seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Continued Conditional Use Application #CU-11-02 of O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC, for 5000 sq. ft. of funeral home and mortuary use (crematorium) in unit #7, 472 Meadowland Drive: and 6. Continued Site Plan Application #SP-11-14 of O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC, to amend a previously approved plan for a 60,000 sq. ft. multi -tenant industrial building. The amendment consists of occupying vacant space (unit #7) with 5000 sq. ft. of funeral home and mortuary use (crematorium), 472 Meadowland Drive: Mr. Homsted noted that technical review had been invoked and the report is very favorable toward the project. He also noted that there are 10 similar units operating in Vermont with no adverse affects. Two of these units are on "Main Streets." Mr. Behr asked about state licensing standards. Mr. Gregory said there is a continual training requirement and also a typical required maintenance. They would be part of a state air pollution permit. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 2 of 6 19 JULY 2011 Mr. Barritt expressed concern with mercury levels which are not addressed by the standards. Mr. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 JULY 2011 PAGE 3 Homsted said the closest house is 700 feet from this site. Mr. Barritt asked if there is a pollution control system. Mr. Gregory said there is a monitor for that. Mr. Barritt noted he has been near these units and you can't tell they are in operation. Mr. Belair read from a report on and "upgraded Power Pack 2." Mr. Gregory said they would upgrade to that, if necessary. The question was raised as to whether the other such facility in South Burlington has any limits imposed. Mr. Belair said it does not. It is a conditional use. Mr. Frank asked if there is an uninterrupted power supply. Mr. Homsted said there are automatic controls and trained personnel on site. Mr. Gregory said that any memorial services would be off the peak hours, per agreement with other tenants. This use would not add to the approved number of peak hour trip ends. Mr. Knowles said he had moved here for air quality and this use distresses him. Mr. Behr noted that air quality is one thing the DRB can regulate under Conditional Review. A member of the audience asked if containers would also be burned. Mr. Gregory said they use heavy duty cardboard boxes made specifically for this use. Ms. Strong felt this use should not be in such a residential neighborhood but should be 10 miles out of town. She felt property values would be affected. Mr. Behr explained that property values are not among the criteria the DRB can consider. Mr. Birmingham noted that the DRB are not experts in this field. There are experts in the State which is why the Board asked for technical review. Mr. Stuono noted this use is not in a residential district. It is in the Industrial Open Space District. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 3 of 6 19 JULY 2011 Mr. Behr said there has been another such use operating in the city, and nobody was even aware of it. Mr. Birmingham moved to close the public hearing. Mr. Behr seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Behr said the DRB will render its decision within 45 days. 7. Continued Miscellaneous Application #MS-11-01 of Claudia Berger and Sheldon Katz for approval to expand a non -complying single family dwelling by: 1) enclosing existing front porch, 2) constructing 6' x 10' covered front porch, 3) converting rear deck to 2-story addition, 4) adding 8' x 12.5' screened in rear deck, and 5) adding two shed dormers, 54 Central Avenue: Mr. Barritt recused himself during this hearing due to a potential conflict of interest. Mr. Stuono asked if the dormer appears on the drawing. Mr. Katz said it does not. Mr. Behr asked if there is any further information. Mr. Katz said that if there is any doubt, the application has to be decided in favor of the application, by Vermont law. He said the project is consistent with the neighborhood. Mr. Alvarez said the Board can rule on access to sunlight by neighbors. He said the proposal would affect his home in fall, winter and spring. Mr. Belair read from the criteria as to what views can be protected. Mr. Alvarez said "overbuilding" is not in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. He explained how light will be blocked from his home by these proposals. Mr. Birmingham then moved to close the hearing. Mr. Randazzo seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Barritt rejoined the Board. 8. Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-11-21 of John Larkin for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) a 32 unit multi -family dwelling, 2) four 9-unit multi -family dwellings, and 3) two 6-unit multi -family dwellings, 201 Allen Road: Mr. Belair advised that the applicant has asked for a continuance until 6 September. Mr. Randazzo moved to continue Sketch Plan Application #SD-11-21 of John Larkin until 6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 4 of 6 19 JULY 2011 September 2011. Mr Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Site Plan Application #SP-11-12 of Ralph Deslauriers to amend a previously approved plan for a 32 unit multi -family dwelling. The amendment consists of: 1) adding a utility cabinet, 2) removing and relocating light poles, 3) relocating a catch basin, 4) revising grading for front sidewalk, and 5) relocating front retaining wall, 264 Quarry Hill Road: Mr. McClellan said the project is now under construction and several changes are being requested: a. A utility cabinet was originally proposed then taken out at the request of Green Mountain Power. They now want it back again. b. A lot would be relocated from one corner of the parking lot to another, further from the building. c. A catch basin would be relocated so it doesn't require another structure. Mr. McClellan showed the location of these items on the plan. Mr. Belair said staff had no issues with any of them. Mr. Randazzo moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-11-21 of Ralph DesLauriers subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Barritt seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Site Plan Application #SP-11-24 of Shearer Chevrolet, Inc., to amend a previously approved 58,086 GFA auto sales and service building. The amendment consists of revising phase II of a four phase improvement project to include: 1) adding 9 parking spaces, 2) architectural changes to the showroom addition, and adding a planting bed, 1675 Shelburne Road: Mr. Belair advised that the applicant had requested a continuance. He recommended 6 September. Mr. Behr moved to continue Site Plan Application #SP-11-24 of Shearer Chevrolet, Inc., to 6 September 2011. Mr. Barritt seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 11. Review and Approve Minutes of 21 June 2011: Mr. Randazzo moved to approve the Minutes of 21 June as written. Mr. Stuono seconded. Motion passed unanimously. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 5 of 6 19 JULY 2011 As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Clerk Date DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 6 of 6 19 JULY 2011 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 May 2011 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 17 May 2011, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: M. Behr, Chair; M. Birmingam, G. Quimby, R. Farley, B. Stuono Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; C. LaRose, Associate Planner; M. Lawlor, C Thrane, W. Land, S. Sobczak, B. & N. Wong, L. Wang, E. Lee, B. Gardner, M. Young, M. & S. O'Brien, K. McQuillin, J. H. & D. Wright, T. Scott, P. Engels, G. Silverstein, S. LaRosa, M. Murray, M. Fibrosi, S. Gregory, E. Bigghins. K. O'Brien, J. P. Leavitt, S. Homsted, D. O'Brien, P. O'Brien, L. Carlson, K. Botton, R. Greco,G. Silverstein, F. Sadowski, J. Pomerleau, D. May, J. Marlin, B. Perry, D. Hewitt 1. Other Business & Announcements: No issues were raised. 2. Continued Final Plat Application #SD-10-35 of Gardner Construction, Inc., to amend a previously approved three lot subdivision. The amendment consists of connecting two of the lots to the City's sewer system in place of on -site septic systems, 22 & 30 Highland Terrace: Mr. Behr noted the need for a mechanism to monitor waste water use. Mr. Belair said it is a condition of approval. He added that Public Works is OK with everything else. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-10-35 of Gardner Construction, Inc., subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Final Plat Application #SD-11-15 of Grant Linnell & Karina Perusse to amend a previously approved two lot subdivision. The amendment consists of: 1) adjusting the boundary line between the two lots, 2) extending a landscaping easement to the west, 3) extending the building envelope on lot #2 to the west, and 4) adding a height restricted envelope on lot #2, 1435 Spear Street: Mr. O'Brien gave members a drawing showing the minor change in the property line. He noted that a 10-foot landscaping easement is also being extended and there is an addition of a height -restricted envelope on lot #2. The garage will be on the east side of the house. Mr. Belair said staff had no issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-11-15 of Grant Linnell & Karina Perusse subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 1 of 6 17 MAY 2011 Motion passed unanimously. 4. Preliminary and Final Plat Application #SD-11-17 of Queen City, LLC, to amend a previously approved plan for 6920 sq. ft. of general office use in two buildings. The amendment consists of a planned unit development resulting in the following: 1) a mixed use building consisting of three multi -family dwelling units and 2429 sq. ft. of general office use, and 2) a 6708 sq. ft. detached accessory building for general office use, 434 Shelburne Road: Mr. Merosa said the plans are identical to what was presented at sketch plan review. There will be three one -bedroom residential apartments. The small strip motel will be an accessory use. Mr. Belair noted the applicant made all the changes requested by the DRB. He also noted there is a 2-space parking waiver (7.4%). Ms. Quimby moved to approve Preliminary and Final Plat Application #SD-11-17 of Queen City, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Conditional Use Application #CU-11-02 of O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC, for 5,000 sq. ft. of funeral home and mortuary (crematorium) use in unit #7, 472 Meadowland Drive: and 6. Site Plan Application #SP-11-14 of O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC, to amend a previously approved plan for a 60,000 sq. ft. multi -tenant industrial building. The amendment consists of occupying vacant space (unit #7) with 5,000 sq. ft. of funeral home and mortuary (crematorium) use, 472 Meadowland Drive: Mr. Behr noted that his name had been put on Facebook without his knowledge with a list of those opposing this application. He immediately asked that his name be removed from that list. Mr. Homsted said the project is in the Meadowlands Business complex located in the I-O District. The proposed use is a conditional use in that district. The issue is whether the use will have an undue effect on neighbors. Regarding noise, Mr. Homsted said he had spoken with representatives of the cremation services company who indicated this facility would use the same equipment as at the Allen Rd. facility. According to them, noise will not be heard outside the building at all. The noise is about 65 decibels at its source and won't be heard in the parking lot. Regarding visual impact, Mr. Homsted said the stack would be only 4 feet high. There would be no additional light. Regarding air quality, Mr. Homsted said that equipment has come a long way and he has DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 2 of 6 17 MAY 2011 been assured that it will run with no smoke or odor. They require an Act 250 approval and will be regulated by the State. All that would be visible would be water vapor. Mr. Homsted said that the data shows that what comes out of the building is less than a home fireplace or an idling diesel. The facility would not contribute to air pollution. Mr. Homsted noted that this is a very small scale operation which would not operate every day. They would probably begin with 3 cremations a week. The process takes 2 hours. Mr. Birmingham asked if there are filters in the stack. Mr. Homsted said there are cleaning mechanisms, but he didn't know where the filters are in the process. Ms. Quimby asked what the equipment runs on for fuel. Mr. Homsted said it runs on gas. Oil is not allowed. He showed a chart of emissions comparisons. Mr. Stuono asked if there would also be a funeral home. Mr. Homsted said occasionally, after 6 p.m. there might be up to 50 people. He indicated that they have a shared parking agreement with adjacent owners in the business park. Mr. Bighins, who owns units #9 & 10, said he has no issues with this use. Mr. Behr asked the applicant to review the conditional use criteria and how they meet these criteria. Mr. Homsted responded as follows: A. There will be no strain on municipal services B. There are no truck associated with this use at all C. There will be no adverse noise or visual impacts D. The use is consistent with light industrial use E. It is located in an industrial zone, and they will maintain a 200 foot buffer. There is also a berm between this use and the neighboring property (over 10 feet high). F. Anticipated traffic is less than what was originally permitted G. There will be no new construction H. There will be no modifications to the site plan. Mr. Homsted noted that the building is 28 feet high, generally one story. Mr. Perry asked the distance to the nearest residence. Mr. Homsted said it is 450 feet to the property line and 600 feet to the nearest house. Mr. Perry said he was concerned with mercury in gaseous form reaching neighbors and asked who would determine how much mercury reaches them. Mr. Homsted said there is not a lot of data available on this; however, the EPA has determined that crematoria are not a significant source of mercury and therefore they don't regulate it. Mr. Homsted stressed that they are a heavily regulated use. Mr. Perry said he would prefer they be in a more removed location. Mr. May asked about the location of the stack in relation to homes on Knoll Circle. Mr. Homsted said they have no neighborhood/area scale studies. He stressed that this is a very small scale operation, and these facilities can't be licensed if there is an issue. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 3 of 6 17 MAY 2011 Mr. Marlin felt this should be looked at more closely and the DRB shouldn't take the manufacturer's word for things. He felt there should be an independent opinion that what is shown in the graphs is true. Mr. Behr said the DRB can invoke technical review to hire a 3' party independent review. Mr. Silverstein said a crematorium is reminder of Nazi times and shouldn't be adjacent to a residential area. Mr. Stuono asked about a possible limit in numbers. Mr. Homsted felt the applicant would be amenable to that. Ms. Carlson noted that the Cremation Association has done studies on emission and their findings are like what was shown. She also noted that Vermont has a very high cremation rate and felt that 3 per week was a low estimate if the price is right. She also noted that in Europe they must add mercury filters which cost about $500,000, and this is not realistic for a small crematorium. A resident said he didn't want to be a "test case." He felt it was a necessary need but not in this location. Another member of the audience asked if there have been any concerns from neighbors of the Allen Road facility. Mr. Belair said he has had not complaints or issues raised. Mr. Homsted noted there is a senior housing development right across the road from that facility. Mr. Stuono asked if there are emission from other uses in the area. Mr. Homsted said only businesses using large trucks, nothing from this particular building. Ms. Quimby moved to invoke technical review of the manufacturer's data and emissions claims, also to include how frequency of use can affect emissions. Mr. Birmingham seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Behr noted there are no concerns with the site plan as there are no changes to an approved plan. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Conditional Use Application #CU-11-02 and Site Plan Application #SP-11-14 until 7 June 2011. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Preliminary Plat Application #SD-11-18 of Heritage Automotive Group to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a multi -building complex used for auto sales, service and repair. The amendment consists of a three phase project to include: 1) the construction of a private on -site, above ground, fueling station, 2) replacing an existing 8,715 sq. ft. automotive building with a 35,032 sq. ft. automotive service building, and 3) the construction of a 600 sq. ft. fagade feature to an existing sales DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 4 of 6 17 MAY 2011 building, 1580-1620 Shelburne Road: Mr. Hewitt indicated that Phase I would include +/- 53 additional parking spaces as well as site lighting for the entire site. It would also include the new service building with adjacent parking and parking for display. They will take down the 9200 sq. ft. building and upgrade the storm water system as well. Phase 2 will include upgrade to other parts of the site, and Phase 3 will include the aesthetic fagade to the sales building, a small amount of moving of curbs, the relocation of the dumpster, and the moving of 2 parking spaces to allow access to the garage door. They are still waiting for input for the Fire Chief and CWD. They are working with storm water people and will meet the city standard for erosion control. Discussion focused on various categories of parking: inventory, display, and customer/employees. Mr. Belair noted that handicapped parking should be included in the customer/employee parking areas. Mr. Belair noted that the applicant is asking for a landscape credit. Mr. Behr felt that with this development they could find areas for $12,000 worth of landscaping. Ms. LaRose stressed that this must be trees and/or shrubs. The applicant indicated that they will meet the 10% rule for islands in the parking lot. There is a question as to whether to have islands in the display parking areas. Members were OK with what was shown (no trees in display areas). They will meet the standard for trees in the customer parking area. Members were comfortable with what was presented. Mr. Young asked whether the gas station is just for fleet use. The applicant said it is. The car wash will also not be open to the public. Stipulation 3f was added to the approval motion as follows: Windows will be added on either side of the new garage door. Stipulation 3b was deleted. The following language was added to Stipulation #4:.... with the exception of the 2 shown ADA parking spaces. Ms. Quimby then moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-11-18 of Heritage Automotive Group subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Discussion of Meeting Length: Ms. LaRose and Mr. Belair indicated they had researched what other towns do to control DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 5 of 6 17 MAY 2011 the length of DRB meetings. The found the following: A. No new agenda item after 10 p.m. B. No new agenda item after 9 p.m. C. A note on the agenda that items that come up after 10 p.m. may be continued. D. No limitations. Other possible suggestions include: earlier start time, limited number of items, limit public input to a specified number of minutes. Mr. Belair agreed to draft a potential amendment to the DRB rules and procedures. As there was no further business to come before the DRB, the meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m. Clerk Date DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Page 6 of 6 17 MAY 2011 IA), southbur iugto PLANNING & ZONING October 11, 2011 Scott Homstead Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 2184 So. Burlington, VT 05407-2184 Re: Request for Reconsideration of #CU-11-02 & #SP-11-14 Dear Mr. Homstead: Please be advised that the So. Burlington Development Review Board (DRB) at their meeting held on October 4, 2011 granted your request for a reconsideration of #CU-11-02 and #SP-11-14 as requested in your letter of September 27, 2011. Once your application has been received, you will be scheduled for a public hearing before the DRB at the earliest available meeting date and will be so informed. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com September 27, 2011 South Burlington DRB 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear South Burlington Design Review Board, DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT RECEIVED SEP 2 9 2011 City of So. Burlington Thank you for considering and approving Conditional Use Application #CU-11-02, the proposed crematorium at 472 Meadowland Drive. Stephen Gregory is eager to faithfully follow the conditions imposed by the DRB on behalf of the community and has asked O'Brien Brothers, the current owner of the unit, to seek clarification and a slight revision of one of the conditions. We would respectfully request further clarification and reconsideration regarding condition # 4 which currently reads; "The crematorium shall operate no more than eight (8) consecutive hours per day during the week and shall not operate on the weekends. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall provide the Administrative Officer in writing the hours of operation chosen for operation." Clarification Requested Please clarify that the 8 hours/day limitation pertains only to operation of the Power -Pak II cremation machine. In a recent conversation with [Ray Belair], he stated that he believed that the DRB intended to limit the operation of the cremation machine and that you did not mean to restrict other activities on the premises, such as administrative duties, memorial services, and meeting with families, any of which may need to happen after traditional business hours from time to time. The proposed new language below would clarify this by substituting the word "crematorium" with "Matthews Power -Pak II". Reconsideration Requested At our public meetings on this matter there was a lot of time spent on potential health issues and other concerns of residents, which left very little time to discuss the practicalities of the proposed condition #4. We accept the 40 hour per week limitation placed by the DRB, which provides enough cremation time for our projected level of business, but which if kept in a strict "weekdays only" without flexibility will greatly diminish the ability to serve customers due to some technical rules of which the DRB may not have been aware. Vermont State law requires a 24-hour waiting period before a person can be cremated. Under current condition #4, anyone that passes away late Thursday afternoon would not be able to be cremated until Monday morning. This not only creates potential serviceability issues for the business, but also puts stress on the families that it serves. In this instance, families will have two options: 1) hold the deceased until Monday morning for closure, or 2) use the other crematory in South Burlington, which operates without restrictions (time or capacity). In order to provide great service and not burden the families that he works with, he would like the ability to cremate on the weekends if required. n SERVING OUR COMMUNITY'S REAL ESTATE NEEDS SINCE 1958 oo;r 1855 Williston Road • PO Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 • 802.658.5000 • fax 658.5002 obrienbroth ersagency.com Finally, condition #4 suggests that the machine must be operated within a pre -specified consecutive 8-hour period Again, Mr. Gregory accepts the 8-hour daily limitation in total but notes that, while he expects to largely run the machine during normal business hours, there may be instances that family needs make running the machine without any interruption highly impractical. The funeral services business entails unscheduled needs of customers that can arise at any time of day, potentially requiring him to be out of the building during the business hours. Our proposed language allows him to "catch up" any such lost hours so that he can service his customers while living within the 40 hour per week in total limitation Our request would change condition #4 to the following: "The Matthews Power -Pak 11 shall operate no more than eight (8) hours per day, nor more than forty (40) total hours per week. It shall not operate on the weekends unless required by the customers or state regulations. When weekend operation is necessary, time will be deducted from the following week." For example: 1f operation of the Power -Pak 11 is required on a Saturday for four (4) hours, the total remaining hours for the following Sunday -Friday will not exceed 36 hours. Again, thank you for this reconsideration. We would also like to reserve the right to ask you to re- examine capacity and hour limitation at a later date if client needs grow beyond our current expectations. Respectfully, r/ 'V / 7;--4 Scott Homsted, P.E. Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 1855 Williston Road, PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT, 05407 cc: Ray Belair September 27, 2011 South Burlington DRB 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear South Burlington Design Review Board, ELOPMENT AND MANAGENIENT RECEIVED SEP 2 9 2011 City of So. Burlington Thank you for considering and approving Conditional Use Application #CU-11-02, the proposed crematorium at 472 Meadowland Drive. Stephen Gregory is eager to faithfully follow the conditions imposed by the DRB on behalf of the community and has asked O'Brien Brothers, the current owner of the unit, to seek clarification and a slight revision of one of the conditions. We would respectfully request further clarification and reconsideration regarding condition # 4 which currently reads; "The crematorium shall operate no more than eight (8) consecutive hours per day during the week and shall not operate on the weekends. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall provide the Administrative Officer in writing the hours of operation chosen for operation." Clarification Requested Please clarify that the 8 hours/day limitation pertains only to operation of the Power -Pak II cremation machine. In a recent conversation with [Ray Belair], he stated that he believed that the DRB intended to limit the operation of the cremation machine and that you did not mean to restrict other activities on the premises, such as administrative duties, memorial services, and meeting with families, any of which may need to happen after traditional business hours from time to time. The proposed new language below would clarify this by substituting the word "crematorium" with "Matthews Power -Pak II". Reconsideration Requested At our public meetings on this matter there was a lot of time spent on potential health issues and other concerns of residents, which left very little time to discuss the practicalities of the proposed condition #4. We accept the 40 hour per week limitation placed by the DRB, which provides enough cremation time for our projected level of business, but which if kept in a strict "weekdays only" without flexibility will greatly diminish the ability to serve customers due to some technical rules of which the DRB may not have been aware. Vermont State law requires a 24-hour waiting period before a person can be cremated. Under current condition #4, anyone that passes away late Thursday afternoon would not be able to be cremated until Monday morning. This not only creates potential serviceability issues for the business, but also puts stress on the families that it serves. In this instance, families will have two options: 1) hold the deceased until Monday morning for closure, or 2) use the other crematory in South Burlington, which operates without restrictions (time or capacity). In order to provide great service and not burden the families that he works with, he would like the ability to cremate on the weekends if required. SERVING OUR COMMUNITY'S REAL ESTATE NEEDS SINCE 1 958 o R-ONM 1855 Williston Road • PC Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 • 802.658S000 - fax 658.5002 obrienbrothersagency.com Finally, condition #4 suggests that the machine must be operated within a pre -specified consecutive 8-hour period Again, Mr. Gregory accepts the 8-hour daily limitation in total but notes that, while he expects to largely run the machine during normal business hours, there may be instances that family needs make running the machine without any interruption highly impractical. The funeral services business entails unscheduled needs of customers that can arise at any time of day, potentially requiring him to be out of the building during the business hours. Our proposed language allows him to "catch up" any such lost hours so that he can service his customers while living within the 40 hour per week in total limitation Our request would change condition #4 to the following: "The Matthews Power -Pak 11 shall operate no more than eight (8) hours per day, nor more than forty (40) total hours per week. It shall not operate on the weekends unless required by the customers or state regulations. When weekend operation is necessary, time will be deducted from the following week." For example; if operation of the Power -Pak 9 is required on a Saturday for four (4) hours, the total remaining hours for the following Sunday -Friday will not exceed 36 hours. Again, thank you for this reconsideration. We would also like to reserve the right to ask you to re- examine capacity and hour limitation at a later date if client needs grow beyond our current expectations. Respectfully, Scott Nonisted, P.E. Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 1855 Williston Road, PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT, 05407 cc: Ray Belair Interested Persons Record and Service List south'Novali 'Eonn erranur Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b) The DRB must keep a written record of the name, alldress and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: ) qLV / / i �o I / PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING AnnRFce DDn ICf`T !•\C iki-rr-r%rn� --- -—,-�—/— �— a � �vvLv 1 vl IIY 1 GRCJ 1 K� 55 vt,0 ►,J � ���-�u� f9 � �.i/"L� �J (,, e �. iL bi ► /l1 /l'., .r c'��h`� �2 t�j�/��.� ✓.f _ ��• �nL�Lr�..�z z ..� T V-1- --1P C Z Z f +1 v U r � t ti •.. Interested Persons Record and Service List e[ra+u�T Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate rmm�lianra �niith t a��li�� ,_� .r'� -24 \[ c n-4dc�iw� �. � c -j. ,h , u ii.0 i a viiuoi of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an ap peal ppeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADnRFSS Don 1=f—r rnE7 lwlTrr%r—^— i �wv�.v � yr IIV 1 CRCJ � L4iLeP`LLt#1 2d Y'1Wu(ia(l Av� V mar �f1AIA 2O�AtJ�L (o 3 1—CuP') S� 1 rv,2L-S T' C re Imck-i?r r I C CS.1b, V� Page 1 of 1 ray From: Valerie Parker [enviromom7@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 11:35 AM To: ray Subject: request for copy of decision.... Importance: High Hi Ray — Per our discussion, please add me to the list to be informed (and get a copy of the report) once the decision has been made regarding the Meadowlands Drive Crematorium. Thanks much — Valerie Parker 7/20/2011 Interested Persons Record and Service List YEi!-0 C:JT c_.. Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five worki days. 24 V.S%.A. § 44 1(c). HEARING DATE: ir1 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST �� (,��L /f/ • t�C�/Z'- /.�'V f�4 S%-7-- V�O �J Gi�Li'✓YiYJ -yJ / T�.�✓��'P S / /4ir/�n o v ell fC� V1 C eF �.i Imo- ►� - l�� �. ' ` t, r� O Interested Persons Record and Service List -'V F. F, M 0 N T Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4411(c). _ HEARING DATE: Ulf PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PRC),IFC_T CIF INTI=RGCT 1&17 r �; �zv r �✓ J g JGL11'�He-�� � "f J �ctYj�r,. �� �CD� 20 t�►� �� it�> (Alai ! (�Y� lSecz Is - En 0,ogC W(M as " V\0 I I ON Interested Persons Record and Service List 5(BLlth€,85riZYB �o1 :r:r.muuT , Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST Cj %� �4t 1 Cj�'P$G+� j� pji�� Syeavna�^� S�" slit �b(/Rv1t �T 1�3y j�1e�rJiN���v( �� '> �% �� Z ���✓� ,� l� ,� �o��. J s rt ,� �, �vss� �� �.1* k I � �35 a- �H►5,v�'�' ., t Please Sign In — G4y-C—ormwi4 Meeting -,A4-onda"ay'PO, 2011 Name Contact Information U �A w/ 19 ZZ 7 7 � N-e/n � �vv� -� J l � w p Ct /ham � � c � - 63 Fodrl- 571STI-,tts. S(5\,)fG(� UT r I 1`1�� I � ci Uj �(t-ANC 5+4�61 a5-�-1 �'6 �i� c,,�-t L.�rv� �.�f�A� � �Sc��csl.�s�� ��c�, 14 1 r^. south ' t PLANNING & TONING August 31, 2011 Re: #CU-11-02 & #SP-11-14 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Since ly, s Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 2913 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846,4101 www.sburl.com Permit Number SP-A_L -' CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC P.O. Box 2184 1855 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 (p) (802) 658-5002 (f) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page#) Book 758 Page 461 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax# Same as above 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Josie Palmer Leavitt O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. P.O. Box 2184 1855 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 (p) (802) 658-5002 (f) 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 472 Meadowland Drive Sou- Burlington, Vermont 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1705-00107 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) The existing use is consistent with the original approval for the property including up to 18,750 s.f. for general office and 41,250 st for other approved activities including: Contractor or building trade facility Light Manufacturing Manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components Printing & binding production facilities Research facility or laboratory Processing and Storage (as of 2/12/10) E b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) The purpose of this amendment application is to get a Conditional Use approval. The modification we are requesting is for a Conditional Use for a "Crematorium" to be an allowed use at Meadowlands Business Complex (MBC). "Crematorium" is a conditional use per South Burlington regulations in the zone district where MBC is located but it was never requested under our umbrella permit and we are now requesting that it be added. c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) The existing building is 50,000 Square Feet d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) The building is a single story with mezzanine. 10,000 s.f. of mezzanine area. The height of the existing building is approximately 32.5 feet above pre -construction grade. e) Number of residential units (inapplicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not Applicable f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 30 office employees + 40 non -office employees = 70 total employees. No more than 20 company vehicles proposed. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Not Applicable 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 348,480 Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing 14.3 % / 50,000 sq. ft. Proposed 14.3 % / 50,000 sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 38.5 % / 134,078 sq. ft. Proposed 38.5 % / 134,0780 sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 29.9 % / 5,380 sq. ft. Proposed 29.9 % / 5,380 sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) NA * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 2 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (Including interior renovations): $ 0 b) Landscaping: S 0 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) n/a 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) 389 VTE b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) 53 VTE c) P.M. peak hour for entire property (in and out) 55 VTE 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 u.m. 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE Summer 2012 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowners. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) The owners of record are provided on a separate attached sheet. 3 5 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT i SIGNATURE OF ROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION REVIEW AUTHORITY: I have reviewed this site plan application Director, Planning & Zoning �Ompi Incomplete ) - - - h-k Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 4 WIN tAMW southburlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit #( -�-� o1Gce use only 1 CONDITIONAL USE / VARIANCE / MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): (x) Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( ) Other 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone & fax #): O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC, P.O. Box 2184 1855 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 (p), (802) 658-5002 (t) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) Book 758 Page 461 3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone, fax #) Same as above 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailing address, phone & fax #, if different from above): Josie Palmer Leavitt, O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. P.O. Box 2184, 1855 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 (p), (802) 658-5002 (f) a. Contact e-mail address: josie@obrienbrothersagency.com 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 472 Meadowland Drive, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: 1705-00107 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): The proposed project will add a crematorium as a conditional use to the existing multi -use industrial/commercial facility. The crematorium will be installed in Unit 7. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): The existing use is consistent with the original approval for the gronerty including up to 18,750 s f for general office and 41,250 s.f. for other approved activities including: Contractor or building trade facility; Light Manufacturing; Manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components; Printing & binding production facilities; Research facility or laboratory; Processing and Storage (as of 2/12/10) c. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): The modification we are requesting is for a Conditional Use for a "Crematorium" to bean allowed use at Meadowlands Business Complex (MBC). The crematorium will be located in Unit 7 occupying approximately 5,000 s. f. It is anticipated the use will have 2 employees and a gathering space for up to 50 persons. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing building to remain): The existing building is 50,000 Square Feet e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine): The building is a single story with mezzanine. 10,000 s.f. of mezzanine area. The height of the existing building is approximately 32.5 feet above pre -construction grade. f. Number of residential Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to remain): Not applicable. g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing & proposed, note office vs. non -office employees): 30 office employees + 40 non -office employees = 70 total employees. No more than 20 company vehicles proposed. The proposed use does not add additional employees or company vehicles beyond the existing permitted uses. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable): Not applicable. Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form Rev 12-2010 8) LOT COVERAGE a. Total parcel size: 348,480 Sq. Ft. b. Buildings: Existing 14.3 % / 50,000 Sq. Ft Proposed 14.3 _% / 501000 Sq. Ft. c. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 38.5 % / 134,078 Sq. Ft. Proposed 38.5 % / 134,078 Sq. Ft. d. Front yard impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 29.9 % / 5,380 Sq. Ft. Proposed 29.9 % / 5,380 Sq. Ft. e. Total area to be disturbed during construction: NA Sq. Ft. * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ b. Landscaping $ c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): Not applicable 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 55 VTE, Proposed conditional use will not add peak hour trips 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Monday through Friday 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATESummer 2012 14) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre - addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). See attached list. Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 E 15) PLANS AND FEE Plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I 1" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. (L-WAiYcea C SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT 0-'&,en SIGNATURE )a PMTY O-V1WR PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: ' I have reviewed this application and find it to be: The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form Rev 12-2010 KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. April 11, 2011 Ray Belair City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Meadowlands Business Complex Unit #7 Site Plan/Conditional Use Permit for "Crematorium" Dear Ray: 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Tel (802) 878-0375 • Fax (802) 878-9618 klengineers@comcast.net Please find attached the Conditional Use Application and additional fee for the above referenced project. We have also attached a new CD with all of the application materials so all of the related documents are on the same CD. Please contact us with any questions or comments. Thank you very much. Regards, /�L Scott Homsted, P.E. swh Enclosure KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. April 8, 2011 Ray Belair City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Meadowlands Business Complex Unit #7 Site Plan/Conditional Use Permit for "Crematorium" Dear Ray: 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Tel (802) 878-0375 • Fax (802) 878-9618 klengineers@comcast.net We are submitting an application for final plat, to request a Conditional Use Permit for a "Crematorium" at Meadowlands Business Complex, located at 472 Meadowlands Drive, South Burlington, Vermont 05403. This is to be located in our Complex and would be referred to as Unit #7, which would consist of 5,000 square foot unit. Enclosed you will find a check for $163.00 for the application, the last site plan, 5 paper copies and 1 reduced to 11 x 17, a CD, envelopes for abutting properties. The applicants are proposing that the crematorium be permitted for two employees and an assembly area of up to 50 persons for services. The number of employees is well within the existing parking, vehicle trip, sewer, and water allocations for Meadowlands Business Complex. Services will only occur on evenings and weekends, outside the peak hours for trips to the complex. Similarly, additional parking for services will be allocated from other units that will not be in business during the times services are proposed. We will be requesting additional sewer and water allocation for the project upon receipt of site plan/conditional use approval. Please contact us with any questions or comments. Thank you very much. Regards, Scott Homsted, P.E. swh Enclosure CC: Stephanie O'Brien Scott Homsted Robert Rushford Meadowlands Business Complex 472 Meadowland Drive Tax Map Parcel 1705-00107 Abutting Landowner List Northeast Territories, Inc. 20 South Crest Drive Burlington, VT 05401 Tax Map 0257-00039 John Larkin, Inc. 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0575-00034 Scott L. & Roberta S. Pennington 26 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00026 Larry W. & Ginette D. Brainard 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00028 Munson Earth Moving Corp. 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 Tax Map 1155-00284 Grandview Farm Inc. P.O. Box 1304 Burlington, VT 05402-1304 Tax Map 0860-01150 Greenfield Capital, LLC 35 Thompson Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1715-00035 Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 Tax Map1705-00125 (All under 0860-01150) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: May 10, 2011 \drb\staffcomments\2011\SP_11_14&CU__1102_472Meado Plans received: April 11, 2011 wlandDr OBrienMeadowlandsLLC enda #5 and #6 472 Meadowland Drive CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION #CU-11-02 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-11-14 Meeting date: May 17, 2011 Owner/Applicant Contact Person O'Brien Meadowlands LLC Josie Palmer Leavitt PO Box 2184 Obrien Brothers Agency Inc 1855 Williston Road PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407-2184 1855 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05407-2184 Property Information Tax Parcel 1705-00107 Industrial Open Space Zoninq District Location Map 1 O'Brien Meadowlands LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking conditional use approval for 5,000 sq. ft. of funeral home and mortuary use (crematorium) in unit #7, 472 Meadowland Drive. The applicant is also seeking site plan approval to amend a previously approved plan to amend a previously approved plan for a 60,000 sq. ft. multi -tenant industrial building. The amendment consists of occupying vacant space (unit #7) with 5,000 sq. ft. of funeral home and mortuary use (crematorium), 472 Meadowland Drive. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on April 11, 2011 and have the following comments. Crematoriums fall in the use definition of funeral homes and mortuaries. This use is a conditional use in the 10 zoning district. As such, conditional use criteria apply. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 14.10(E) of the Land Development Regulations the proposed conditional use shall meet the following standards: 1. The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. The South Burlington Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Industrial Open Space Zoning District: "was intended originally to provide land for high -quality, large -lot industries and offices whose buildings and operations are consistent with a location in an environmentally healthy and visually sensitive area adjacent to residential neighborhoods... Recently, there have been significant concerns about the suitability of this district for warehousing, particularly in areas adjacent to existing residential neighborhoods. While this area is close to the Airport and the planned highway interchange at Route 116 and 1-89, the noise and visual impacts associated with truck traffic are potentially very disruptive to residential neighborhoods. This issue has been discussed during the SEQ Concept Plan; among the ideas evaluated were the creation of a warehousing sub -district adjacent to the Interstate. In any case, there was strong consensus that the zoning regulations for the 10 district regarding warehousing should be re- evaluated. " While the language from the Comprehensive Plan calls out warehousing uses specifically, staff finds that the general view of the 10 district as identified in the Comprehensive Plan, approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council, is that the area remains a viable 2 location for industrial uses, provided that such uses are sensitive to the surrounding residential neighborhoods in terms of noise and visual impacts. Though the Land Development Regulations do not at this time specifically include these limitations, another goal appears to be cognizant of noise, air quality, light, and visual impacts. The Comp plan goes on to list recommendations for the area, including: 3.3Continue to limit uses in the Industrial -Open Space District to clean, high quality light manufacturing, research and testing, and office uses, and take steps through zoning and development review to limit potential adverse impacts on adjacent natural areas and residential neighborhoods. 3.4 Revise the LDRs to ensure that all truck -intensive uses in the IO district are located a sufficient distance away from residentially -zoned lands to prevent adverse noise, air quality, light, and visual impacts. Staff recommends that the Board consider any potential adverse impacts related to noise, air quality, light, and visual impacts and whether these are consistent wit the above statement. 2. The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located. The stated purpose of the district is "to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and Burlington International Airport." The application before the Board is for a proposed change in use. The building is fully approved and permitted, and no site plan changes are requested. The existing building and layout of the site meets the stated purpose of the district. 3. The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. Staff believes that the proposal will not adversely affect municipal services or educational facilities. Relevant impact fees have already been paid with the construction of the building. (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. Staff advises the Board to review the statements above with respect to the planned character of the area. The subject property IS located in an industrial zone. This industrial zone is located adjacent to a residential neighborhood. A 200 foot buffer is mandatory in the 10 zone along the residential zoning district boundary. This buffer was implemented with construction of the building. Staff advises the Board to consider any outward, undue and adverse affects of the proposed use. The applicant should be asked to address this. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. The proposal will not affect traffic in the vicinity. Traffic studies and impact fees were paid 3 with the subdivision of the greater area, as well as the construction of the building. No new construction is planned and the proposed change in use is not traffic -intensive. (d) Bylaws in effect. Again, this use must be regulated as a conditional use as per the zoning district. All other bylaws have been met. No new construction is proposed. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposal will not affect renewable energy resources. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. (t) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. 0 (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements Access/Circulation No new construction is planned as part of this application. The change in use will not affect the site layout or other elements of the site plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board consider whether any undue, adverse affects related to those noted in the Comprehensive Plan, such as noise, air quality, and light. If the Board finds that the proposed use is fully self-contained and no such impacts will be generated, staff recommends approval of the conditional use. If this can not be ascertained, then staff recommends denial of the conditional use. Respectfully submitted, Cathyan La Rose, AICP, Associate Planner k Ew. SYw /7 e• h, h-JJzoz' --a B'h. ovr-JJI. ---__-- -- r 7,_aAw s �� 1 \ I. tot I MOWM forth IFA eaA Location Mop o RECEIVED ..w Aaorlcant arloF,�o(�o++: �V/ 5 P 1, �...1 / f : Si, ,rwcrwo+ , , , f • %S , ll l / 1 O)Wiw Meodboibno% uc A 80.2184 "23. / I South Bw/ilglw, VT 05403 A APR 1 1 2011 l,drlh� told wea -sae acres (xad� as /G) lira=s-e7 171r+,, f / ; n/' ",d•0 _- zor,:+o Of SO. Burlington t as >wa n mab.$ slrl0l and Open Oce Zanily DIsINN - Lot COMEM $rf n A. l Yw, ew.ed concret uoet 1j /, / IP)• / aASS N WelkwWs rAkW E.a/ Pown�w+I o ,ta: Teof /I each trance xr W. Ortemkollbn Aft in 01 v A 340ad/ 10/-JAaNIM ar / Y 1 11/t/72 for 1 e407e,1. 1 P<IS I At n 7o/Pl '5407s st aest sae aPHilionol i./orinolral. / No new d'ilweance h lI .� 1 I �rl �% i` \ ;� 3� ; ) • / / sa..., I f Ol Pbss O wet/mat awr 7Anr / ' r*ehdd i4 or or~ ewllw 'o II � � i„`• �� ,P'� '�oa,w / , � j " / / / � I I P/CIDOU/Q ,ttr, .bc M..+ /i t �? / 1 or rhv - satelel' CO°,y h +y„'� 40.0010 so ft 11hrehouse istrambi:n/Cantroctor • ! _, / I / � f / I /D spacej?.OaO so /l. � ZO spaces / 1 / ireA 'e AYw Ar. A• / / 1 / Z. I Id750 sa It O/rrce wave • .33 sooces/P. 000 sa/I - 66 spaces te.nreti / IIJ.K "",v m' to aoo sa ft. wwenou,e (mezmnme) It 4aac",12. 000 sa ft - s spaces r.a ... I s.te,ms. eswne+r rota es R ded 9t Slaaa e°V spaces h ' 1 1 1iM l / wi.wa raen a Proposed Parking $ocet - 100 (nd/'J nandcappe0) a 1 1 1 1 L7 '! \ \ \\ , / I / '/ // / / \ \ `.I \ I I I''�, See rs Are Jahl wanWe 1 j , .. 1 / / J �b% `•, j • /�; 1 /�h1111 '111 Y / Vet M7 A4JY -�- s., r conaw Pohl I P.PPwrr Lh. w R/eP1 or fflr ap' /% 1 ill III / LA`I''o 1111 'jaii 'i 111 11 m E,ur , .. mPnna. I III I / AY -WO Id - /' 1 11 11 11 1 1 I it 1 I I Ewbrhe -1,* eo h 70r we We he / / / / / // 1 1 14 *L+ Fihfi..... v M. q •/• rwdrhq—I- Ewirl /h. f/welr 7 - ` -_--_ _ _ _ �, // / ' 1 I NOW rwwv-� Ew4f' hood /px� } _ r fr , 'sae -': ^,. �,��ii i� r / ! l v \ 1 %Ill � 7 %/ t .ol dkak r P'ro,rry Al- s+w+ se waT o Ma+ ----- v'------ n.. a isn d / �IebiO el.she4 11 - J,t.6en6n.0 Or —J N.w Mnh.). PPP• r .w. ronrMrol.::+r le+r. / \ \ sno+ I\ _/; ��I// OW ,rrr ; a SWIA, PS i �iwrd �P~i fw.�. lets �43 . 1 f rolchy \\ \' l /i,\\\\ of I- \•\� ai.�� :/i �.�a/aim rR'., -___�� ,.Yid ./ f .brwa ! «a4 Aleob Vet IM A121F YVW�"• - �' .ae pan, Sb Oef Stoll t AbOr/o tar/ t G7.e/N ly( p IOW Idlll wP.dM 0' M. 40' W. I�0' 1so, 100' Bor Scole t- = eo XUI Un/1 7 conWli d .. PPp*&a ,. ..n 11. 2010 t 70ae d~w -A- a WW 10 Paafw .nabaur. ant 700e P007 fPlif rW rw+e., Uif 1 N4 afway. nri,W Cw/OInJ./ pad, Pownwnl 0l Ue ! anfrmc. aldl aw4 e. 1"7 pa.9 _d _ PPda 2" I9"�"'Gd f�, hrwhand&- P d occ ra la.n1 0.1. nw..d D-1416- Ge.ca.d Pol. Design W Site P/on Drown rtfP/$Pw Checked Meodow/onds Business Comp/ex Scale t • 40' Dale ors zaae Lot 2 Meodow/ond Industrial Pork Project 03/16 477 Meodowland bile South BwWoolon• Vermont ARMS et LANS/NC Consu.11iny Engineers, /ne � 4" ISW Alain Street, CoIcAesterr, Mermont 05,"S Lot 10 ry \ E isfM9 �p Lot 7 -' 1 Summer Ice JointN ,, M>T Ex SMrr /J * i- \ E. SNN 0\ ✓enture Rlm�JJB 49 akn-Ju.Oo' Vol M7 P. 439 Mv. M JJ1.06 Y Mv. M JM..85 Ex. SMN /1 - R u /n v. ouf JJ0.81 Rhr-JJ9.75 SW /t W M B' Inv M_JJ21' Ex. Rim-J41, t7' New 50'x10' B" Inv, M-SJ1.0?' 80• ROW Cy /rive JJ770' slaDdnired canshuction s B" Inv our-.,j .. 9rn'rA� e _ - ----- " x. B� Pl•C s - -.-- - ® New dk_tr dow/on Drive E.islidq i -sign M� cu/wrI -- N 40)? ve 340.7. BE18losAnvInear aJitr[0w6 ntao,r L .Z y,\b� � -�� 2`3`\7JJ4Y�3r`J � 0ew4 5 h i ��?4' ,__8 ro^c>w�r/rnous / //ai_' 1_ "--- _ _CLASS /#q �I _ \\ it '♦ % 1 I \ 340. I I Lot / / 3 r 7 / / ,i New conslryclion� Munson Earth Monng Corp. / /7pkd Dn F d l' tI 1 11 5 �f0 toas° l / 1 concrete block l ! w / p e f consNucNpn. y,Sa - �� / • ' / I I �.,Pi//Or,6. Two 07 / l t l[- ry'0 nigh av1%Me, 3396 // I I Existing Pond I each enF1i� 'Ior�arl I Location MQD /o I t mdP / l Renee» o ri l l\ i e. 1 1 1 l Owner & Aoolicont Information: ? Derien Meadowlands, LLC P.O. Box 2184 l l' eemrs p4 z3+ /r 1 �✓ (r .) \ ` Urrr reroMMp w,is. v f j39 / //� {. I I South Burlington, VT 05103 Arens: ErisHn��ding f / �// c ion n Total area = 800 acres (J48,480 sq. ft.) I / (416 -8- by l20)_ P / ll / lkmt f-cn9 - / I \ l 50,000 sq ft Zoning: ery 20' / Industrial and \ / I/ '/ f/nr? • L M1, h S i Ped stdpn V Open Space Zoning District 20 V1 easement Lot Coverage ,/ / Finished F/Oa%_ - / / / / i Pevwous Surface Area .T Mox. Allowed concrete block I I CLASS // Wet/ands I / Eiev - JfJ S' a Ersrh9 3x13' / i 11 pi//ors Two of dL psra Tjp cd / .l l . ') b I�j Refer to Conof tionol each dptrance ,3 r r<' A> wch u /t `9. ( // l ) - Cn Use Determination No. � 1 O.M) / r e ��� S,tiy. / - .Y/ I I I 1, � 2001-398 doted 1111102 for additional infortnotion. t / �j)/f N t sn r J l III No new disturbance Sa' „eN rFl of Coss U wet/onds ��'°� ! dour I 1 or wel/ond buffer T I rMol 1 / Proposed \ l///l l l 01' n t d`et�+^:�ae� l > / l/ ; I B�a� e I " ',1 1 •\ / / I ,R »edf f�rn / srrJenon_ _ ` l/`�•, fen See �\ \ �� / 1 �n Eln%B p� Ntwr,R7rw Jp' If 33. // I/r� Dsfe1rrs D Meplli l � I ,oeofe existing 70' dolwl ne'l� I l / ounme of cross n imajfannngl / ' 4 wnonds Lot J SuAw' Summer /ce ,lf venture V'/ 387 P.139 im-M. � l� 1I 11 11 ill i II � 11 4— N I I \ Il nl I i111 I A rl 11 \// roew IWR / raa �1 I 1 ll \ ! 20• E lone !! /+eew wren b lr' l I / I/ 1 1 w d 1 '/ /i/ I1j11II111it it it It TV �• i //\\\ \ .SY�ow�\l\11\\ std�ge�W#hy pods f its 9 8 10 Tw / wycropoo/ Extended ,, �/ Stormwdler / / //�/� i// l ll / _ = _= _ _ _ Detention 200'z Mp Buff \'45 �\ 1 \ \ \ ✓L 1 I // // _ ` New pl.N hn .>ir rce unI 'New a S/ Lot � Mitt i c', oo e. see; / MunS EOrth Mo rig Corp Vo/u 657 Page t67 _� �_� IIIII � � � _/1 IE I O ember 1B 2m-J \I%l/l/11 Acreage: B.00 / / New a\ / \ / / i I - , ✓ �'�� fence see 0 t ds. / t . - tec Mind OPen 33 — .�OnMidhnl Zan/rip Cbfr/c� Homer R Mwe Dubois - - Vol 179 P, 125 New stone check Ex. -- � i,'v4ow• ®ao�n Oanrs. 5» Oe/orls. Rim-Jfj J4J 02'7' Scott et Roberto Lorry At Cnette Pennington B oinord Vol 209 P. J26 IbJ 211 P.287 Notes I 1. 114 is not o OWndory »troy Property /Mes snow we /rain a P/on enfined Neod' Mnd Bushes' Pork - 5,60 ion RW by T,,aWl Co lfi v En9.— doted AP,- 2J, IM, recorded h ✓,ume W Pope 98 M the City of 5ouM S Hd gton Land Records. r I E,;,t g Buddn s 0 E. 011 1 N/A Exisfin9 Pa,ement 0 sf OM N/A Proposed Bu,ldn SQ 000 sf 1 N. JA' I JOT Proposed Pove n-t 84107E sf. 1 241SI N/A Tor, Covero a 1134,078 st I JS 5TI 50l Fionf d Covero 19.9J Parking 40,000 sq.ft. Warehouse/Olstnbution/Contractor " I space/2,000 sq.ft. = 20 spaces 18,, 750 sq. ft Office space 4 J 5 spaces/l, 000 sq, ft, - 66 spaces 10, 000 sq. ft warehouse (mezzanine) el spaces/2, 000 sq. ft. = 5 spaces Total Spaces Required = 9/ spaces Proposed Pork/ng Spaces = 100 (ncL/5 handiopped) Legend J- Surwy cmh, poml Lne w Right of Way —JJt tn Exrsg ground contour m E ;'frig »wet monh,e Eafng catch Dasn s E ;sting sewer line - -��--rr - - - Ensfing wror fine spw Ens69n hydronr / water wive - Exsing /enro rWwv� E wing wood IMe ----- 334------ New fniahed grotle p New lumhoks • •� New contnuous 01 fence • ♦ New constr tkn limit nmchg 0' 20' 40' 80' 120' 160' 200' Bar SCC16 I" = 40' January 11. 2010 dumpsrer enc1 d shined 10' swh OcfoDtr 1 2009 aroaw f 200E dumPsrer enclosure swn April 4, 2008 y 16, 2007 PA'_ ewn split roil fence, unit 1 _tAs sroroe9e swn conden wsed ser Pods, porevnenf f Un;t / enfronce swn Fearu 6. 2007 I' x 4' condenser pods swn tw� Auaust J0. 2006 _ a pond mart �..,,. Design IA✓ Site P/on Drown FMP/SWN Dheaked Meadow/ands Business Comp/ex Scale /" - 40• Date Maya2006 Lot 2 Meodowlond Industrial Pork Project 05146 472 Meodow/ond Drive South Buffington, Vermont ARLBS & LANSZW Consulfing Fngineers, Ina .�- " , 164 Alain Street, Colchester, Vermont Or5446 ThoOther Paper April 28, 2011 > % I .., 1, ss*1f 1 LOVE'S CARE Care with a heart. We treat you,like family. Need help withtransportation and errands? Escort to appointments? Grocery shopping and cooking? Light ^housekeeping and laundry? Nursing home visit? Companionship and recreation? Travel companions? Basic pet care?Medication reminders? Outings and travel assistance? Exercise and aid with physical therapy? Or any other task? Reasonable rates. Call'657-3357 or 881-1188. AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS Pines Senior living Community in South Burlington offers I & 2 bedroom apartments. [lent includes all utilities. Optional living and health services. Community tour every Wednesday at 12:30 p.m. 865-1 09. PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hear- ing in the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on May 17, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. to consider the fol- lowing: 1. Final plat application #SD-11-15 of Grant Linnell & Karina Perusse to amend a previously approved two (2) lot subdivision. The amendment con- sists of: 1) adjusting the boundary line between the two (2) lots, 2) extend- ing a landscaping easement to the west, 3) extending the building enve- lope on lot #2 to the west, and 4) add a height restricted envelope on lot #2, 1435 Spear Street. 2. Preliminary & final plat application #SD-11-17 of Queen City, LLCto amend.' a previously approved plan for 6920 sq. ft. of general office use in two (2) buildings. The amendment consists of a planned unit development result- ing in the following: 1) a mixed use building consisting of three (3) multi- family dwelling units and 2429 sq. ft. of general office use, and 2) a 6708 sq. ft. detached accessory building for general office use, 434 Shelburne Road. 3. Conditional use application #CU-11- 02 of O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC for 5,000 sq. ft. of funeral home and mor- tuary use (crematorium) in unit#7, 472 Meadowland Drive. 4. Preliminary plat application #SD-11- 18 of Heritage Automotive Group to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a multi -building complex used for auto sales, service and repair. The amendment consists of a three (3) phase project to include: 1) the con- struction of a private on -site above ground fueling station, 2) replacing an existing 8,715 sq. ft. automotive build- ing with a 35,032 sq. ft.`automotive service building, and 3) the construc- tion of a 600 sq. ft. facade feature to an existing sales building, 1580-1620 Shelburne Road. Mark Behr, Chairman SB Development Review Board Copies of the applications are avail- able for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. April 28, 2011 TAG SALE Community Lutheran Church Annual Flea Market: Friday, April 29 from 9 a.m. - 6 p.m., Saturday, April 30 from 9 a.m. - 3 p.m., 1560 Williston Road, SB. 864-5537 "Huge" semi -annual PTO Tag sale: Orchard School, SB, to Ben- efit SLIMY (Sustainable Living Initiatives Motivating Youth). 2 Baldwin Avenue (behind The Goodwill on Shelburne Road) Friday, May 6`h, 3-7 p.m. and Sat- urday, May 71h, 8 a.m.-2 p.m. Any questions, please contact Mary Gleason 863-3395. READING TUTOR ' Experienced reading specialist available for summer tutoring and assessment in reading, spelling, writing, and early literacy. Certified Wilson Instrutor for students with learning disabilities. References available. 985-5Q22 YARD SALE:- Huge multi -family sale. 87 Butler Drive, SB. 8 a.m. - 2 p.m. Saturday, May Th. WANTED SB CLASS OF 1976 GRADUATES: Please help us to locate the fol- lowing classmates: Diane Bowker, Francis Gouchoe, Fausto Caimi, Karen Case, Jim Hamell, Lori Case, Robert Hamilton, Stewart Engleman, Rick Jarvis, Jamalle French, Kathleen Kelleher, Bill Gallant, Alf Kristiansson, Corry Glade, Frank Ladd, Aileen Ladue, John Magnus, Steve Milne, Maryellen Murphy, Nancy Murray, Linda Prescott, Cynthia Rogers, Tom St Louis, Roy Sandoval, Don Sheffield, Kelly Shea, Sara Poitras, David Corliss, Michael Jarvis, Patty Chamberlain Gen- tile, Linda Hibbard, Kathy Lin- coln Meltzer, Brian Fleming and Stuart Tabakin. Call 802-238-7884 and leave mes- sage with update or mail to Class of 1976 P.O. Box 2095 S. Burlington, VT 05407-2095. All Class of 1975, 1976, 1977 SB stu- dents are invited to attend S.B Class of 1976, 35thReunion.The event will take place June 2511' at the Double Tree Hotel. Visit our webpage at http:// consultwithvip.com/reunion. (04/28) VOLUNTEERS NEEDED TO DE- LIVER FOR MEALS ON WHEELS: Are you free between 9:45-11:45 am on the third Thursday of the month? Want to deliver a meal and a smile to the home bound in Burlington/Williston Rd? Contact Diane, 863-3f more details on how you come a regular or sul driver/runner for this cause. (04/14) Vermont Fusion Girl's U Basketball Team has a fe, ings for 101h and 1111' p Practices in So. Burlingi Charlotte. Contact Julie at jmclayton34@yahoo. call 233-1993 for more u tion. (04/ 14) LOST Clip -on chandelier earri ange and yellow. Rewai 4377 (04/28) Nikon camera case wii photo lens. Possibly near Please call 658-0465. (04/ FREE Free classical violin mug beginner organ. 651-0854 ROYAL TYPEWRITER, cin will need servicing. 8E (04/ 14) FOR SALE CHAIRS: Wingbacks. Bu color. Gently used. $5 238-9233 (04/28) CLAPBOARDS: Used ced, boards, painted white side, 10-inch quarter western red cedar. Large removed, cleaned and sta dry location, removec home in SB. Also, alui corners for clapboards. foot. 863-5134 (04/28) HP SLIMLINE s7421C: I pentium M processor. I 250 GB hard drive, DV Windows XP media cent tion (freshly installed a. dated). Includes AV, antivirus and Open Offii ductivity suite. 864-6670 ITEMS: Rancilio Silvia e,, machine and Rancilio burr grinder. $475 for tl 652-9897 (04/ 14) Os� I Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 400 Davis Drive, Suite 400 p RIE COPY Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462' " StantK TeL (484) 322-0301 Fax: (484) 322-0302 July 15, 2011 Via Electronic Mail Mr. Ray Belair Administrative Officer 575 Dorset St City of South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Technical Evaluation of Matthews International, Cremation Division Power -Pak II Proposed to be installed at 472 Meadowland Drive, So. Burlington, VT. Stantec Project No. 191610454 Dear Mr. Belair: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., (Stantec), on behalf of the City of South Burlington and its Development Review Board, has reviewed applicable data (i.e., stack testing results, Matthews International Cremation Division Power -Pak II system operating information and the Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations) and contacted an existing operator of a Crematorium in the City of South Burlington concerning the proposed installation of a crematorium as well as several state regulatory agencies regarding their experiences with crematorium emissions. Presented below you will find summaries of those inquiries and reviews pertaining to the operation of other crematory units in Vermont, odor reducing methods, particulate emissions including mercury emissions, and a discussion about the operation of the Power -Pak II unit. Review Findings for the Matthews Power -Pak II System The Power -Pak II is designed to eliminate odors generated while the unit is in operation. The unit functions at temperatures of 1,200 1,800°F (650' - 1,000"C) in the primary chamber and 1,400°-1,800'F (760°-1,000"C) in the secondary chamber. An afterburner, located within the secondary chamber, ensures the proper combustion of gases prior to their release from the unit. The Smoke-Buster®140 is the portion of Power -Pak II that is responsible for the reduction and elimination of smoke and odor during the active incineration process. Under proper operating conditions and with appropriate maintenance, the Power -Pak II is designed to function without producing any odors. As is the case with elimination of odors, the Power -Pak II is designed to function without visible emissions or smoke, so long as appropriate maintenance is performed and the incineration unit is operated as per the manufacturers specifications. The manufacturer of the Power -Pak II strongly recommends the use of natural gas for incineration to prevent the production of smoke, which is a characteristic of units operated alternatively by fuel oil. 3. Several additional characteristics of the Power -Pak II unit aid in preventing the release of particulate matter. The Power -Pak II includes the VPS-1 Processing Station which is a dust recovery system that essentially prevents the unnecessary exposure to remains following the incineration process. The Smoke-Buster®140, in addition to eliminating odor, provides the appropriate heat for complete combustion of particulate matter from the gases before being released through the stack. Lastly, the Power -Pak II is equipped with an automatic emission monitoring system (Pollution Monitoring & Control System) that checks and regulates stack emissions released from the unit during operation. Included in the emission monitoring system is an opacity indicator that notifies the Stantec Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Board Administrative Officer Page 2 of 5 Technical Application of Matthews Power -Pak 11 Unit 711512011 Stantec Project No. 191610454 operator of changes in particulate matter present in the incinerator's emissions. If the emission monitoring system detects particulates, the operator is notified, incineration in the primary chamber is halted and the temperature of the afterburner increases. As a result, the incineration process is slowed to ensure sufficient combustion of particulate matter prior to being exhausted through the stack. This monitoring device allows for continued operation of the crematory unit while remaining in compliance with all state air pollution regulations. The particulate matter regulatory standard for the state of Vermont is 0.06 grains per dry standard cubic foot adjusted to 7% 02 (Permit Application Guidance for Crematories, Vermont's Air Pollution Control Division, rev. 7/1/10). 4. The operation of the Power -Pak II unit reduces remains to 200 cubic inches of ash in less than two hours. Therefore, a total of four cremations could be completed in an eight -hour period. The unit is designed to process a maximum charge capacity of 150 pounds per hour. In less than thirty seconds, the remains are collected in an electric cremated remains processor for easy transfer to an urn. The processing station associated with the unit has a dust recovery system for operator safety and to minimize contact with remains. A climate -controlled, three -body cooler comes with the incinerator unit and has removable shelves that allow for easy transfer to/from mortuary cart and/or casket. An auto -loader increases efficiency and operator safety, while providing a professional viewing experience for family members. 5. Another unit is currently operating in the City of South Burlington, VT. The unit has been in operation since 1984. The unit was upgraded in 2006 to a Super Power -Pak II due to an increase in the number of units to be processed. Based on conversation with the owner, no violations of either particulate emissions or odor were received by the owner since the unit's start up in 1984. 6. General violations issued in the state of Vermont regarding crematorium operations have been the result of operational issues. They include: electrical issues, incorrect valve installed on propane tank supplying fuel, overheating of unit due to the charge being too high (i.e., body was obese). The pollution control monitoring system on this unit is designed to alert the operator of a potential malfunction and allow the operator to adjust the operation of the unit. 7. Source testing of the Matthews Power -Pak II units was performed in Philadelphia, PA in September 2010 and Sacramento, CA in January 2009 and the particulate emission loading (adjusted to 7% 02) did not exceed the Vermont standard of 0.06 grains per dry standard cubic feet of exhaust emitted. 8. These Matthews Power -Pak II units are currently operating in ten Vermont cities, including the City of South Burlington. 9. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) does not currently regulate mercury emissions from crematory operations. The main source of mercury during cremation is the presence of amalgam fillings prior to incineration. The problem with evaluating mercury emissions is the lack of data because the topic is not well researched and few studies have been conducted. Additionally, a lot of variability is present in the limited data that exists concerning estimates of the quantity of mercury volatilized during cremation. Sources estimate mercury releases between 0.227 and 8.6 grams/cremation. The variation in values is based on differing mercury levels present Stantec Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Board Administrative Officer Technical Application of Matthews Power -Pak // Unit Stantec Project No. 191610454 Page 4 of 5 711512011 manufacturer's recommendations for the operation of the Power -Pak II are followed. Additionally, the operator should attend annual training to ensure new developments are incorporated into the operation of the crematorium. This is not to say that this unit will never have any operating issues over time. A review of other state agencies experiences with crematorium operations (including those in Vermont) indicate that there have been situations where a visible emission or odor has occurred but these instances should be minimized due to the monitoring systems employed by the Power -Pak II that detect these operational malfunctions before they allow for an air pollution violation to persist for any length of time. The Power -Pak II is equipped with multiple safeguards to ensure that odors are not detectable by the general public. That includes primary and secondary combustion chambers, a "Smoke -Buster 140" to ensure the combustion of smoke and odors from the system and a pollution monitoring control system to alert the operator should smoke order odors be detected. Another safeguard for the general public is the applicant will have to submit an application to the Vermont Air Pollution Control Division of the Department of Environmental Conservation for approval before beginning construction from the APCD. The permit will include visible emission and odor clauses that will be part of the permit to operate. In addition, there will be restrictions as to what type of caskets can be burned in the crematory, the height of the stack and the requirements for having a certified operator of the unit. This will ensure that the proper operation of the Power -Pak II will be achieved. If not, the unit's operation will be shut down by Vermont's Air Pollution Control Division. 3. The Power -Pak II must be installed with noise generation in mind. Depending upon where the unit is to be placed, consideration for noise generation should be part of the evaluation. Most municipalities and/or townships have outside noise limitations which must be adhered to when installing a new piece of equipment in a location. 4. Most of the current data regarding mercury emissions and other toxic emissions comes from European sources and the amount of data for US crematoriums is limited. However, more and more focus is being placed on mercury and other potentially toxic emissions from crematoriums due to the increasing numbers of cremations around the country. Funeral homes generally remove pacemakers and radiation seed implants if the family notifies them of their existence prior to cremation and any replacement joints are removed before the crushing of the ashes. While there are no requirements to do so at this time, the removal of teeth containing mercury prior to cremation or the installation of an air pollution control device to reduce mercury emissions may be warranted at some time in the future. With the increasing number of cremations annually, the inclusion of caskets in the cremation process and the number of obese individuals being cremated, additional pollution control requirements may be required but at this time the Power -Pak II unit, if operated to the manufacturer's specifications with a certified operator, will allow the unit to be operated with a minimal amount of environmental issues. 5. Finally, the applicant should consider purchasing the "top of the line" unit as another layer of assurance to remaining in compliance to the Vermont APCD. The upgraded unit offers more retention time for the gases being produced during the cremation process to be in the combustion chambers thus reducing the potential instances for odors being emitted to the atmosphere. Stantec Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Board Administrative Officer Page 3 of 5 Technical Application of Matthews Power -Pak // Unit 711512011 Stantec Project No. 191610454 from other organs that store mercury, averaging values over a certain number of cremations and potential differences in total weight of amalgam per body. As of 2005, only one crematorium in the US had a pollution control device on the exhaust stack. Though other states, such as Minnesota, have attempted passing legislation creating standards for mercury emissions from crematoriums, no regulations have been successfully adopted by any state. As no federal or state standard has been set, compliance inspections of crematory facilities do not target concentrations of mercury in emissions. For locations where mercury emissions are a concern, two mitigation approaches include installation of a scrubber or removal of amalgam -filled teeth prior to beginning the cremation process. In the eyes of the VT Air Pollution Control Division (APCD), mercury is not a significant concern when determining compliance of a crematory with state regulations. According to the data retained by the APCD, a single crematorium's mercury emissions would not meet the action level set by the state in terms of Ibs of emissions/8hrs of operation. 10. Stantec spoke directly with two other regulatory agencies (New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection-NJDEP and Delaware's Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control-DNREC). The DNREC contact said that DNREC hasn't had any non-compliance issues or violations with crematoriums in general. Very few complaints have been made, and when they have received complaints they are in regards to a proposal for unit installation, not about one currently in operation. The NJDEP representative has not responded to our inquiry as of the date of this letter. 11. A European Study published in "Environment International" presents information relative to polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDDs/PCDFs). Concerning PCDDs/PCDFs, crematoriums that have a dust concentration below 50 mg/m3 tend to have lower concentrations of PCDDs/PCDFs. Additionally, the presence of a dust collector, the temperature of the secondary chamber, and the number of chambers connected to the secondary chamber all significantly reduce the concentrations of these emissions. For new facilities, three mitigation techniques can be utilized specifically to minimize the concentrations of PCDDs/PCDFs emitted: 1) connecting one secondary chamber to one main chamber during operation, 2) installation of a high -efficiency dust collector to reduce dust concentration, and 3) installation of a sample point for monitoring PCDDs/PCDFs. To this point the USEPA has not established any limits for PCDD/PCDF emissions. Recommendations Based on the technical information provided by the manufacturer, a review of stack emission data from Philadelphia and Sacramento, discussions with the operator of an existing Matthews Power -Pak II in the City of South Burlington, and a technical review of mercury emission data and other state regulatory experiences with crematorium emissions, Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec) feels that the proposed unit can be operated in compliance with Performance Standards AA and A.5 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective March 15, 2011. The operation of the proposed unit will be in compliance with the visible emission and pollutant discharge requirement of the Vermont Air Pollution Control Division during its operation. Odors should not be detected beyond the property line (the nearest residence is approximately 550 ft. to the southeast of the proposed location of the Matthews Crematorium Power - Pak ll). This is provided that the applicant's operator is trained properly to ensure the Stanbec Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Board Administrative Officer Page 5 of 5 Technical Application of Matthews Power -Pak ll Unit 7/15/2011 Stantec Project No. 191610454 Should you have any questions regarding this information, please contact me at (484) 322- 0301, Ext. 7101 or via email at peter. charringtonstantec.com. Yours Truly, STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. Peter R. Charrington, P.E. Principal Engineer Prepared for: Mr, William Sucharski Manager Philadelphia Crematories, Inc. 7350 State Road Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19136 Submitted to: Mr. Ramesh Mehadevan Environmental Engineer Philadelphia Department of Health Air Management Services 500 South Broad Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19146 Submitted: September 2010 Philadelphia CrernatoriGr, Inc. Project No 3248 Aua' ust 2010 Revision No. 0 1.0 Introduction AirNava, Inc. conducted an emission compliance test program at the Philadelphia Crematories, Inc. facility located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania an August 25, 2010. Emission sampling was conducted to determine emissions from one (1) human crematory incinerator in operation at this site. The unit is identified as Furnace A. The emission testing was performed in determination of particulate matter for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with regulations specified by Philadelphia Air Management Services (AMS) Installation Permit regulations. Previous testing conducted on May 20, 2010 indicated that Furnace A exceeded the particulate matter emission limit of 0.03 gr/DSCF @TY6 02. Air -Nova, Inc. was responsible for all on -site sampling, sample analysis and for the submittal of the final test report. The report which follows provides a description of the source, the sampling location and a discussion of all test methodologies and analytical techniques employed in the completion of this test program. Any questions pertaining to the information provided herein may be addressed to: Mark D. Daly AirNova, Inc. 5845 Clayton Avenue Telephone: (856) 486-1500 Telefax: (856) 486-9896 E-mail: daffy®airnova.com IA,rN^va, inc Philadelphia Crematories, Inc, Project No, 3248 Auaust 2010 Revision No. 0 2.0 Source Description The emission source under evaluation includes one (1) IEE Power- Pak II crematory incinerator. The incineration system consists of primary and secondary combustion chambers which are each fired by natural gas only, The waste stream consists solely of human remains and associated materials. Waste is charged to the incinerator at a maximum capacity of 100 pounds per hour. Details regarding the emission sampling location are provided below. 2.1 Test Port Location - Furnace A The exhaust stack is 20 inches in diameter. Two (2) test ports situated at 90' apart and located 157-inches (7.9 duct diameters] downstream and 102-inches (5.1 duct diameters) upstream from the nearest flow disturbances were utilized for all sampling. Thetraverse points utilized across each diameter are provided below in Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Philadelphia Crematories, Inc. Emission Compliance Test Program Traverse Point Locations Furnace A Point Ala. Lo'catzOn +inches 1 2.1 0.5 2 6.7 1.3 3 11.8 2.4 4 17.7 3.5 5 25.0 5.0 6 35.6 7.1 7 64.4 12.9 8 75.0 15.0 9 82.3 16.5 10 88.2 17.6 11 93.3 187 12 97.9 19.5 * * Relocated in accordance with EPA Reference Method 1, Section 11.3.2.1 AirNova, Inc. 2 Philadelphia Crematories, Inc.. Project, No, 3248 Auaust 2010 Revision No. 0 3.0 Summary of Test Results A complete summary of results for the test program conducted atthe Philadelphia Crematories, Inc. facility for Furnace A is provided in tabular format below in Table 3-1 Table 3-1 Philadelphia Crematories, Inc. Emission Test Data Summary Crematory Incinerator - Furnace A Run No, 1 a 3 Average AMS Permit Limit Date Ei a 5;" 1 (1 10 8/25/ 10 fvne Period W'35-1('1XI 1215-1319 1535-1638 rernporatuve (' 1) 989 927 1,015 977 Moisture Content 12,9 7.0 15.7 11,9 vOurtt'y (Ifps) 19,5 16.7 '1117 1 I.3 F low 'Hate [AC I M) P'155el1 2,061 2,182 2,266 Flow Raw (OlJ-'-'FM) 812 732 660 735 Oxygen 10.2 10,11, 1 DO loll Carbon Dinxida (%dry) 7.2 7,0 7.0 71 Particulate Matter Concentration (gr/DSCF) 0.022 &011 0066 0.03i — Concentration (gr/DSCF @ 7% 02) o.n29 O'Ll 15 0084 0,043 0,03 Emission Rate (lb/hr) 0,15 0,07 0,37 0.20 IStandard CondilJons: 68°F, 29.92 in- Hg IAirfWva, Inc. 3 BEST ENVIRONMENTAL Livermore, California �Ac:-e s SACRAMENTO MEMORIAL LAWN Sacramento, CA Compliance Emissions Test Report Particulate Matter Emissions Results Matthews Cremation Division Model IE43 PowerPak I1 Cremator (ATC #20795) Test Date(s): January 7, 2009 Report Date: January 23, 2009 Test Location: Sacramento Memorial Lawn 6100 Stockton Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95824 Performed and Reported by: BEST ENVIRONMENTAL (BE) 6261 Southfront Road Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 455-9474 Fax: (925) 455-9479 Prepared For: Attn: Teresa Guyan StoneMor Partners L.P. Sacramento Memorial Lawn 6100 Stockton Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95824 For Submittal To: Attn: Ady Santos Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District 777 12" Street, 3Id floor Sacramento, CA 958I4-1908 BEST ENVIRONMENTAL Livermore California SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Test Purpose Best Environmental was contracted by Sacramento Memorial Lawn to perform Particulate emissions testing on the Matthews Cremation Division Model IE43 Power -Pak 11 Cremator, located at Sacramento Memorial Lawn, in order to comply with the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) Permit to Construct #20795, The test results are presented in Table 2.1 on Page 2. A copy of the Permit to Construct is included in Appendix K. 1.2. Test Location The testing was conducted on the exhaust outlet of the Cremator, which is located at Sacramento Memorial Lawn, 6100 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA. 1.3. Test Date(s) Testing was conducted on January 7, 2009. 1.4. System Processes The cremator is equipped with a 0,7 MMBtu/hr primary burner and a 1.2 MMBtu/hr secondary burner. There are no filtration or scrubbing devices used on this system. 1.5. Pollutants Tested The following emission parameters were measured: Parameter Monitoring & Analvtical Protocols Volumetric Flow Rate CARB Methods 1-4 PM (Filterable & Condensable) CARB Method 5 02, CO2 Modified CARB Method 100 1.6. Sampling and Observing Personnel Emissions sampling was performed by Suhail Asfour and Ross Hippie of BEST ENVIRONMENTAL (BE). Ady Santos from the SMAQMD was present to witness the testing. 1.7. Other Important Background Information A total of three human bodies were cremated during the source test, one for each run. Z:UUpcM\F\2004LSactamentnMemorialLawnVext.DOC BEST ENVIRONMENTAL Livermore. California 2.1. Emission Results SECTION 2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS Table 2.1: PARTICULATE - SUMMARY TABLE ATC Q0795 1.9 NIMBtu/hr Cremator Parameter Average Limit Stack Flow, DSCFM 956 Total Particulate Matter (PM), gr/dscf (a) 12% CO2 0.0475 0.10 A more extensive summary of the emissions is presented in Table 1 following the text. 2.2. Identification of Deviations from Standard Testing Procedures CO2 and OZ were measured using CARB Method 100, modified to exclude the use of a system bias line. Calibration checks were performed using the system manifold of the test van. This method modification was approved by the SMAQMD (see Appendix J). 2.3. Testing or Process Interruptions and Changes No interruptions occurred during the source test. 2.4. Process Data, as related to the Determination of Compliance The cremator was operated at a temperature at or above of I800T throughout the testing. 2.5. Description of Collected Samples Following testing all particulate samples are recovered and/or sealed onsite and placed into pre - labeled containers for shipment. The front and back half glass; nozzle, probe, filter housing and impingers used for particulate testing were rinsed on site after each run per method guidelines. All recoveries were placed into appropriately labeled containers. A Chain of Custody (COC) was filled out for all samples to ensure proper handling and analysis. 2.6. Comments: Discussion of Quality Assurance and Errors Quality assurance procedures listed in the above referenced test methods and referenced in the Source Test Plan are performed and documented. The QA/QC procedures are described in Section 4.5 of the report. Documentation of the QA/QC is provided in Appendix A, B & D. A preliminary cyclonic flow check was performed prior to testing. The average stack angle was well below 10°, therefore a cyclonic test using the alignment technique, was not necessary and was not performed. All emission rates and factors are calculated based on the CARB Methods 1-4 flow data. Z:1RepomMh\2009�Sacramento Memorial lswnUenDOC 2 BEST ENVIRONMENTAL Livermore, CA 925455-9474 TABLE #1 Sacramento Memorial Lawn PMta Emissions Results Crematory (ATC #20795) RUN # 1 2 3 AVERAGE LIMITS TEST DATE 01 /07109 01 /07/09 01 /07/09 TEST TIME 0956-1100 1203-1307 1419-1523 PRODUCTION RATE, lbs/Hr 160.0 130.0 140.0 143.3 SAMPLE VOLUME (DSCF) 37.013 35.493 36.252 36.253 ISOKINETIC (%) 107.5 102.6 103.1 104.4 DUCT TEMP., (OF) 882.3 816.5 776.3 825.0 VELOCITY (Nsec) 20.14 19.74 19,48 19.79 FLOW RATE (ACFM) 2.634 2,581 2,548 2.588 FLOW RATE (DSCFM) 948 952 968 956 HIO (volume %) 9.39 11.63 11.88 10.96 02 (volume %) 11.39 11.92 14.36 12.56 CO; (volume %) 6.10 5,96 4.22 5.39 F.H. Particulate Rinse Conc. (gr/DSCF) 0.0004 0.0021 0.0005 0.0010 F,H. Particulate Rinse Emissions (Lbs/hr) 0.W4 0.017 0.005 0.009 F.H. Particulate Filter Conc. (gr/DSCF) 0.0115 0.0187 1 0.0159 0.0154 F.H. Particulate Filter Emissions (Lbs/hr) ( 0.093 0.153 1 0.132 0,126 Total F.H. Particulate Cone. (gr/DSCF) 0.0120 0.0209 1 0.0104 0.0164 Total F.H. Particulate Emissions (Lbs/hr) 0.097 0.170 0.136 0.135 Orpnic Particulate Conc. gr/DSCF 0.0003 0.0005 0.0002 0.0003 Organic Particulate Emissions (Lbslhr) 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.003 Inoreanic Particulate Conc. (gr/DSCF) 0.0036 0.0052 0.0034 0.0041 tnoreanic Particulate Emissions (Lbs/hr) 0.030 0.042 0.028 0.033 Tot. Particulate Conc. (gr/DSCF) 0.0158 0.0265 0.0201 0.0208 Tot. Particulate Cone.(gr/DSCF)(a 12%COI 0.0312 0.0543 0.0570 0.0475 0.10 Tot. Particulate Emissions (Lbs/hr) 0.12117 0.2165 0.1663 0.1705 Tot. Particulate Emissions (Lhs/day) 1.2867 2.1647 1,6635 1.7050 WHERE DSCF - Sample Volume in Dry Standard Cubic Feet ACFM - Actual Cubic Fcot per Minute DSCFM = Dry Standard Cubic Feet per Minute H:O, volume 0% - Stack gas percent water vapor gr/DSCF= Particulate concentration in grains per DSCF F.H. Particulate - Filterable Particulates Organic Particulate - Condensible Organic Particulute (solvent cxtruct) Inorganic Particulate = Condensible Inorganic Particulate (Acids & Sulfutes) TPH o Tons per Hour CALCULATIONS Lbs/hr Emission Rate - 0.00857 • gr/DSCF • DSCFM Lbs ton Emission Factor = lbs,hr / TPH Tot. Particulate Concentration @ 12% COr - gr/DSCF • 12 / COr% Lbs/day Emission Rate - Ibs(hr • 10 zw.Port.an�m0018.a.rtr+c Lww j u.nV w ft CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: July 12, 2011 \drb\staffcomments\2011\SP_11_14&CU_11_02_472Meado Plans received: April 11, 2011 Wand Dr OBrienMeadowlandsLLC 472 Meadowland Drive CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION #CU-11-02 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-11-14 Agenda #4 and #5 Meeting date: July 19, 2011 Owner/Applicant Contact Person O'Brien Meadowlands LLC Scott Homstead PO Box 2184 Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers 1855 Williston Road South Burlinaton. VT 05407-2184 Property Information Tax Parcel 1705-00107 Industrial Open Space Zoning District Location Map r E 1 O'Brien Meadowlands LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking conditional use approval for 5,000 sq. ft. of funeral home and mortuary use (crematorium) in unit #7, 472 Meadowland Drive. The applicant is also seeking site plan approval to amend a previously approved plan to amend a previously approved plan for a 60,000 sq. ft. multi -tenant industrial building. The amendment consists of occupying vacant space (unit #7) with 5,000 sq. ft. of funeral home and mortuary use (crematorium), 472 Meadowland Drive. The application was reviewed on May 17, 2011 and continued through several meetings so that the Development Review Board could solicit a third -party technical review of the emissions data submitted by the applicant. Associate Planner Cathyann La Rose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on April 11, 2011 and have the following comments. Crematoriums fall in the use definition of funeral homes and mortuaries. This use is a conditional use in the 10 zoning district. As such, conditional use criteria apply. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 14.10(E) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed conditional use shall meet the following standards: The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. The South Burlington Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Industrial Open Space Zoning District: "was intended originally to provide land for high -quality, large -lot industries and offices whose buildings and operations are consistent with a location in an environmentally healthy and visually sensitive area adjacent to residential neighborhoods ... Recently, there have been significant concerns about the suitability of this district for warehousing, particularly in areas adjacent to existing residential neighborhoods. While this area is close to the Airport and the planned highway interchange at Route 116 and 1-89, the noise and visual impacts associated with truck traffic are potentially very disruptive to residential neighborhoods. This issue has been discussed during the SEQ Concept Plan; among the ideas evaluated were the creation of a warehousing sub -district adjacent to the Interstate. In any case, there was strong consensus that the zoning regulations for the 10 district regarding warehousing should be re- evaluated. " 2 No Text While the language from the Comprehensive Plan calls out warehousing uses specifically, staff finds that the general view of the 10 district as identified in the Comprehensive Plan, approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council, is that the area remains a viable location for industrial uses, provided that such uses are sensitive to the surrounding residential neighborhoods in terms of noise and visual impacts. Though the Land Development Regulations do not at this time specifically include these limitations, another goal appears to be cognizant of noise, air quality, light, and visual impacts. The Comp plan goes on to list recommendations for the area, including: 3.3Continue to limit uses in the Industrial -Open Space District to clean, high quality light manufacturing, research and testing, and office uses, and take steps through zoning and development review to limit potential adverse impacts on adjacent natural areas and residential neighborhoods. 3.4 Revise the LDRs to ensure that all truck -intensive uses in the IO district are located a sufficient distance away from residentially -zoned lands to prevent adverse noise, air quality, light, and visual impacts. Staff recommends that the Board consider any potential adverse impacts related to noise, air quality, light, and visual impacts and whether these are consistent with the above statement. The Board may wish to consider the performance standards in this review. The applicant submitted testimony which states that there will be very little emissions from the proposed use, which they have stated will be less than other common uses (see chart submitted by applicant). The Board sought the independent technical review of a third -party consultant. The consultant reviewed the applicant's submission, as well as the proposed technology for the crematorium. His feedback is included in a letter dated July 15,2011 (see attached from Stantec Consulting Engineers). The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located. The stated purpose of the district is "to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and Burlington International Airport." The application before the Board is for a proposed change in use. The building is fully approved and permitted, and no site plan changes are requested. The existing building and layout of the site meets the stated purpose of the district. The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. Staff believes that the proposal will not adversely affect municipal services or educational facilities. Relevant impact fees have already been paid with the construction of the building. 3 (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. Staff advises the Board to review the statements above with respect to the planned character of the area. The subject property IS located in an industrial zone. This industrial zone is located adjacent to a residential neighborhood. A 200 foot buffer is mandatory in the 10 zone along the residential zoning district boundary. This buffer was implemented with construction of the building. Staff advises the Board to consider any outward, undue and adverse affects of the proposed use. The applicant and the consultant have addressed this to some extent. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. The proposal will not affect traffic in the vicinity. Traffic studies and impact fees were paid with the subdivision of the greater area, as well as the construction of the building. No new construction is planned and the proposed change in use is not traffic -intensive. (d) Bylaws in effect. Again, this use must be regulated as a conditional use as per the zoning district. All other bylaws have been met. No new construction is proposed. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposal will not affect renewable energy resources. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. ll (t) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements Access/Circulation No new construction is planned as part of this application. The change in use will not affect the site layout or other elements of the site plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board consider whether any undue, adverse affects related to those noted in the Comprehensive Plan, such as noise, air quality, and light. If the Board finds that the proposed use is fully self-contained and no such impacts will be generated, staff recommends approval of the conditional use. If this can not be ascertained, then staff recommends denial of the conditional use. Respectfully submitted, athya V 1 LaRose, AICP, Associate Planner 5 Prepared for: Mr, William Sucharski Manager Philadelphia Crematories, Inc. 7350 State Road Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19136 Submitted to: Mr. Ramesh Mahadevan Environmental Engineer Philadelphia Department of Health Air Management Services 500 South Broad Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19146 Submitted: September 2010 Philadelphia Crematories, Inc. Project No 324a Auroust 2010 Revision No. 0 1.0 Introduction AirNava, Inc. conducted an emission compliance test program at the Philadelphia Crematorips, Inc. facility located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on August 25, 2010. Emission sampling was conducted to determine emissions from one (1) human crematory incinerator in operation at this site. The unit is identified as Furnace A. The emission testing was performed in determination of particulate matter for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with regulations specified by Philadelphia Air Management Services (AMS) Installation Permit regulations. Previous testing conducted on May 20, 2010 indicated that Furnace A exceeded the particulate matter emission limit of 0.03 gr/DSCF @7i') 02. Air -Nova, Inc. was responsible for all on -site sampling, sample analysis and for the submittal of the final test report. The report which follows provides a description of the source, the sampling location and a discussion of all test methodologies and analytical techniques employed in tha completion of this test program. Any questions pertaining to the information provided herein may be addressed to: Mark D. Daly AirNova, Inc. 5845 Clayton Avenue Telephone: (856) 486-1500 Telefax: (856) 486-9896 E-mail: dalygairnova.com AIrNovq, Inc 1 I Philadelphia Crematories, Inc. Project No. 3248 Auaust 2010 Revision No. 0 2.0 Source Description The emission source under evaluation includes one (1) IEE Power- Pak II crematory incinerator. The incineration system consists of primary and secondary combustion chambers which are each fired by natural gas only. The waste stream consists solely of human remains and associated materials. Waste is charged to the incinerator at a maximum capacity of 100 pounds per hour. Details regarding the emission sampling location are provided below. 2.1 Test Port Location - Furnace A The exhaust stack is 20 inches in diameter. Two (2) test ports situated at 90' apart and located 157-inches (7.9 duct diameters] downstream and 102-inches (5.1 duct diameters) upstream from the nearest flow disturbances were utilized forall sampling. Thetraverse points utilized across each diameter are provided below in Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Philadelphia Crematories, Inc. Emission Compliance Test Program Traverse Point Locations Furnace A Point No. °/n:vf D�artieteK` _ Lardaon" inches 1 2.1 0.5 2 6.7 1.3 3 11.8 2.4 4 17.7 3.5 5 25.0 5.0 6 35.6 7.1 7 64.4 12.9 8 75.0 15.0 9 82.3 16.5 10 88.2 17.6 11 93.3 18.7 12 97.9 19.5 * * Relocated in accordance with EPA Reference Method 1, Section 11.3.2.1 AirNova, Inc. 2 Philadelphia Crematories, Inc. Project, No 3248 August 2010 Bevis on No. 0 3.0 Summary of Test Results A complete summary of resutz for the test program conducted at the Philadelphia Cremetorias, Inc. facility for Furnace A is provided in tabular format below in Table 3-1. Table 3-1 Philadelphia Crematories, Inc, Emission Test Date Summary Crematory incinerator - Furnace A Run No. V ` 2 3 Average J4lVl5 ��}i titiC it [77aate Ei;/2.5 ` 10 1EV 2 sr'' 11-1 8 2.5/ 1(I IPorlod 01110 1r1 V15,1319 1535-1638 nt};»raburty i^ 1-y 989 927 1,015 977 Moisture Content 12,9 7.0 15.7 11.9 15.7 16.7 I L How Rate (/aCiWj :',554 2,061 2,182 2,266 Fluty 9au3 (tJwFl=i-M) 812 732' 66D 735 Cjxy,xo;n (, is clry) 10.2 10.1 10A 10,1 Carbon Dioxide ic;i tj) 7.2 7.a 7.0 7.1 Particulate Matter k' Concentration (gr/DSCF) 0.022 0.011 0 066 0.033 — Concentration (gr/DSCF 0 7% 02) (1029 0.015 0.084 0,043 0,03 Emission Rate (Ib/h.r) 0,155 0 07 0,37 0.20 ----- Standard Conditions: 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg AirNwa, Inc,. 3 BEST ENVIRONMENTAL Livermore California SACRAMENTO MEMORIAL LAWN Sacramento, CA Compliance Emissions Test Report Particulate Matter Emissions Results Matthews Cremation Division Model IE43 PowerPak II Cremator (ATC #20795) Test Date(s): January 7, 2009 Report Date: January 23, 2009 Test Location: Sacramento Memorial Lawn 6100 Stockton Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95824 Performed and Reported by: BEST ENVIRONMENTAL (BE) 6261 Southfront Road Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 455-9474 Fax: (925) 455-9479 Prepared For: Attn: Teresa Guyan StoneMor Partners L.P. Sacramento Memorial Lawn 6100 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95824 For Submittal To: Attn: Ady Santos Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District 777 12°i Street, 3'd floor Sacramento, CA 95814-1908 BEST ENVIRONMENTAL Livermore California SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Test Purpose Best Environmental was contracted by Sacramento Memorial Lawn to perform Particulate emissions testing on the Matthews Cremation Division Model IE43 Power -Pak II Cremator, located at Sacramento Memorial Lawn, in order to comply with the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) Permit to Construct #20795, The test results are presented in Table 2.1 on Page 2. A copy of the Permit to Construct is included in Appendix K. 1.2. Test Location The testing was conducted on the exhaust outlet of the Cremator, which is located at Sacramento Memorial Lawn, 6100 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA. 1.3. Test Date(s) Testing was conducted on January 7, 2009. 1.4. System Processes The cremator is equipped with a 0.7 MMBtu/hr primary burner and a 1.2 MMBtu/hr secondary burner. There are no filtration or scrubbing devices used on this system. 1.5. Pollutants Tested The following emission parameters were measured: Parameter Monitoring & Analvtical Protocols Volumetric Flow Rate CARB Methods 1-4 PM (Filterable & Condensable) CARB Method 5 02, CO2 Modified CARB Method 100 1.6. Sampling and Observing Personnel Emissions sampling was performed by Suhail Asfour and Ross Hipple of BEST ENVIRONMENTAL (BE). Ady Santos from the SMAQMD was present to witness the testing. 1.7. Other Important Background Information A total of three human bodies were cremated during the source test, one for each run. Z-Mxpons\PA\200%Sacmmenco Memorial LawnVenDOC BEST ENVIRONMENTAL Livermore California 2.1. Emission Results SECTION 2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS Table 2.1: PARTICULATE - SUMMARY TABLE ATC 420795 1.9 MMBtu/hr Cremator Parameter Average Limit Stack Flow, DSCFM 956 Total Particulate Matter (PM), gr/dscfp, 12% CO2 0.0475 0.10 A more extensive summary of the emissions is presented in Table 1 following the text. 2.2. Identification of Deviations from Standard Testing Procedures CO2 and 02 were measured using CARB Method 100, modified to exclude the use of a system bias line. Calibration checks were performed using the system manifold of the test van. This method modification was approved by the SMAQMD (see Appendix J). 2.3. Testing or Process Interruptions and Changes No interruptions occurred during the source test. 2.4. Process Data, as related to the Determination of Compliance The cremator was operated at a temperature at or above of 1800°F throughout the testing. 2.5. Description of Collected Samples Following testing all particulate samples are recovered and/or sealed onsite and placed into pre - labeled containers for shipment. The front and back half glass; nozzle, probe, filter housing and impingers used for particulate testing were rinsed on site after each run per method guidelines. All recoveries were placed into appropriately labeled containers. A Chain of Custody (COC) was filled out for all samples to ensure proper handling and analysis. 2.6. Comments: Discussion of Quality Assurance and Errors Quality assurance procedures listed in the above referenced test methods and referenced in the Source Test Plan are performed and documented. The QA/QC procedures are described in Section 4.5 of the report. Documentation of the QA/QC is provided in Appendix A, B & D. A preliminary cyclonic flow check was performed prior to testing. The average stack angle was well below 10°, therefore a cyclonic test using the alignment technique, was not necessary and was not performed. All emission rates and factors are calculated based on the CARB Methods 1-4 flow data. Z:U%pensUtth12009Wcramento Memorial LawMtcxt.00C HEST ENVIRONh1ENI'AL Llvemiore, CA 925455-9474 TABLE #1 Sacramento Memorial Lawn PMta Emissions Results Crematory (ATC #20795) RUN # 1 2 3 AVERAGE LIMITS TEST DATE 01/07/09 01/07/09 01/07/09 TEST TIME 0956-1100 1203-1307 1419-1523 PRODUCTION RATE. Ibs/Hr 160.0 130.0 140.0 143.3 SALMI VLE VOLUI E (DS417) 1 37.013 35,493 3C�.252 36.253 ISOKINETIC (%) 107.5 102.6 I03.1 104.4 DUCT TEMP., (OF) 882.3 816.5 776.3 825.0 VELOCITY (Nsec) 20.14 19.74 19.48 19.79 FLOW RATE (ACFM) 2.634 2,581 2,548 2.588 FLOW RATE (DSCFM) 1 948 952 968 956 H2O (volume %) 9.39 11.63 11.88 10.96 02 (volume %) 11.39 11.92 14.36 12.56 CO2 (Volume %) 6.10 5,86 4.22 5.39 F.H. Particulate Rinse Conc. (gr/DSCF) 0.0004 0.0021 0.0005 0.0010 F.H. Particulate Rinse Emissions (LbsAir) 0.004 0.017 0.005 0.009 F.H. Particulate Filter Conc. (gr/DSCF) 0.0115 0.0187 0.0159 0.0154 171-1. Particulate Filler Emissions (1bs/hr) 0.093 0.153 0,132 0,126 Total F.H. Particulate Conc. (s,r/DSCF) 0.0120 0.0209 0.0164 0.0164 Total F.H. Particulate Emissions (Lbs/hr) 0.097 0.170 0.136 0.135 Organic Particulate Conc. gr/DSCF 0.0003 0.W05 0.0002 0.0003 Organic Particulate Emissions (Lbs/hr) 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.003 Inorganic Particulate Conc. (gr/DSCF) 0.0036 0.0052 0.0034 0.0041 Inorganic Particulate Emissions (Lbs/hr) 0.030 0.042 0.028 0.033 Tot. Particulate Conc. (gr/DSCF) 0.0158 0.0265 0.0201 0.0208 Tot. Particulate Conc.(gr/DSCF)@12%COI 0.0312 0,0543 0.0570 0.0475 0.10 Tot. Particulate Emissions (Lbs/hr) 0.1287 0.2165 0.1663 0.1705 Tot. Particulate Emissions (Lhslday) 1 1.2867 2.1647 1.6635 1 1.7050 WHERE DSCF - Sample Volume in Dry Standard Cubic Feet ACFM - Actual Cubic Feot per Minute DSCFM = Dry Standard Cubic Feet per Minute H=O, volume 1% - Stack gas percent water vapor gr/DSCF - Particulate concentration in grnins per DSCF F.H. Particulate Filterable Particulates Organic Particulate - Condensible Organic Particulute (solvent oxlmct) Inorganic Particulate - Condensible Inorganic Particulate (Acids & Sulfates) TPH - Tons per Hour CALCULATIONS LMr Emission Rate - 0.00857 ` gr/DSCF ` DSCFM Lbs/lon Emission Factor = lbs'hr / TPH Tot. Particulate Concentration ® 12% CO, - gr/DSCF • 12 / COr% Lbs/day Emission Rate - Ibs(hr ` 10 Z.Vt�y,YnU1F7M1�018aoorv�le M-,W jLa-vsWw-t Emissions Comparison Legend: $ ® Residential Fireplace i 6 Diesel 4 Truck � 3 ° ❑ Restaurant N 2 Cooking 100 E Hamburgers w Per Hour 0 Particulate Nitrogen Volatile Organic ❑ IEE/ALL Matter Oxides Compounds Cremator SUMMARY From the attached emissions evaluation of a diesel truck, a car and a cremator, we created a graphical presentation that visually enhances a comparative overview of the emissions output. 25.00 20.00 15.00 N G Z 0 10.00 a � 5.00 i 0.05 0.1 0.00 Particulate 22.20 7.16 1.86 0 52 ]02 ) 17 OM 0.001 Carbon Monoxide Nitrogen Oxide Hydrocarbon POLLUTANT O Car ■Diesel Truck OCremator I( Page 1 of 5 ray From: Mark Abrams [markringa@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 4:39 PM To: ray Cc: Kevin McQuillen; houchens@comcast.net Subject: To the South Burlington Development Review Board, to be made part of the record: INITIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNICATIONS ON PROPOSED CREMATORIUM, To the South Burlington Development Review Board, to be made part of the record: INITIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUN To the South Burlington Development Review .Board, to be made part of the record: INITIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNICATIONS ON PROPOSED CREMATORI,UM, May 9 to May 17, 2011 on: butlerfarms i�fro_ntporchforum.com PROPOSED FUNERAL HOME AND CREMATORI1JM By Paul Houchens, Knoll circle, houchens@comcast.net Mon, 09 May 2011 Post your note to neighbors: butlerfarms@frontporchforum.com Did anyone see the small public notice posted in the Other Paper recently about the funeral home and crematorium planned for Meadowland Drive (across from Oak Creek)? There were very few details printed other than the size of the building (5,000 square feet). I'm curious to hear people's thoughts on this project. Paul Houchens 36 Knoll Cr. PROPOSED FUNERAL HOME AND CREMATORIUM By Janice Nadworny, Mill Pond Ln, jnadworny(cr��,gmail.com Tue, 10 May 2011 5/23/2011 C C Page 2 of 5 Post your note to neighbors: butlerfarms@frontporchforum.com Not the best choice for a residential area... and not great for property values. Maybe a better location would be at the end of Tilley Drive! Janice Nadworny 18 Mill Pond Lane PROPOSED FUNERAL HOME AND CREMATORIUM By Peter Plumeau, Knoll Cir, peplumeau@wnail.com Thu, 12 May 2011 Post your note to neighbors: butlerfarmsnfrontporchforum.com I checked with the chair of the Development Review Board and he said they haven't seen this project come before them yet. Personally, I'm concerned about potential toxic emissions that may come from this facility. Based on some very quick internet research, I've found two things: (1) there is significant concern in the scientific and environmentalist communities regarding as yet not well -understood toxic mercury and other emissions from crematoriums; and (2) scientists who have studied this uniformly say that there needs to be a lot more research on this toxic potential of these facilities as there is tremendous growth in demand for them around the world. This suggests that many of these facilities are being sited without a clear understanding of their potential air quality impacts on human health. I also quickly looked at the VT DEC website regarding regulations of crematoriums. I couldn't find a lot, but there is a state permitting process. I couldn't tell how much attention is paid to the toxicity of emissions; what I read seemed to focus on the amount of emissions and neighborhood "nuisance" issues (e.g., noise, smoke, etc.) only. If anyone has more info on either this proposed facility or the science and regulations related to crematoriums, please share with the neighborhood. I think we as a neighborhood need to be on top of this proposal and decide whether and how to be involved in the permitting and review process. Peter Plumeau peplumeaunggmail.com 5/23/2011 Page 3 of 5 PROPOSED CREMATORIUM By Mark Abrams, Highland Terrace, markringanamail.com Fri, 13 May 2011 A crematorium? Really? At that distance to our (numerous) homes, the reality is that to some degree, when trying to relax outside we will be breathing fine particulate of human beings. I'd rather not. A crematorium should be located significantly further from Meadowland Drive to gain sufficient dispersal. Our area may look like "country," but it is not. It is a relatively densely populated area of homes which are personal sanctuaries, often maintained with effort and sacrifice. I regard this proposal as offensive. *The City has a responsibility to provide protection from it, and I encourage all who feel similarly to voice their opinions. Sincerely, Mark Abrams CREMATORIUM - WHAT HAPPENED IN TONAWANDA, NY By Kevin McQuillen, Hinesburg Rd, mcquillenk(c�r�,yahoo.com Sat, 14 May 2011 Crematorium Controversy 9:23 AM, Sep 22, 2009 It's not the kind of neighborhood dispute you hear about all the time but Tonawandans living near a crematorium say they're increasingly concerned about the facility's effect on their health and quality of life. "Would you like a crematory in your backyard?" asked Ron Labuda, whose Werkley Road home sits in the shadow of the smokestack which services a crematorium operated by Amigone Funeral Home at 2600 Sheridan Drive. 5/23/2011 10/ t Page 4 of 5 Labuda and other residents have actually been doing a slow burn over this for nearly two decades but say the problem has worsened,... claiming the sounds of the crematorium fans --as well as the smell from its emissions -- permeates their neighborhood on a more frequent basis. "And you can imagine us running around shutting the windows while he can run that thing all day.... we get no rest! We cannot play in our backyards and our properties has been taken away from us," Labuda told 2 On Your Side. The Vice President of Amigone Funeral Homes says he's heard such complaints ever since they began burning bodies here almost 20 years ago, but believes they are unwarranted. Vincent J. Amigone says there should be no offensive odor emitting from a properly functioning crematorium and that the noise from the exhaust fans servicing his incinerator (which he says is almost brand new) usually can't be heard over the din of traffic on Sheridan Drive. Werkley Road resident Nancy Varco countered Amigone's assessment by claiming that on a weekends when Sheridan traffic is not heavy the crematorium emits a sustained and quite audible "roar". "You can hear it inside my house," Varco told WGRZ-TV. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation recently intervened in the dispute on the neighbors behalf by ordering Amigone to increase the height of its smokestack in an attempt to mitigate odors possibly coming from from the crematorium. Amigone told 2 On Your Side he plans to complete the work next week. "We have done everything the DEC has ever asked," Amigone said. Meanwhile Labuda and others worry about the potentially deleterious effects emissions from the crematorium might have on the health of nearby residents. 5/23/2011 C C Page 5 of 5 Sitting in his living room with stacks of research, Labuda noted that there has been increasing concern surrounding the release of mercury in crematoria emissions from the dental fillings of deceased persons. While the Environmental Protection Agency currently does not regulate emissions from crematoria, it might soon be inclined to mostly due to the growing number of people choosing cremation and thus the increased amount of pollutants being released as a result. FUNERAL HOME By Chuck LaBombard, Moss Glen Ln, clabombard@natca.net Sun, 15 May 2011 Funeral Homes serve a very significant need to American society. Crematoriums although kind of creepy seem to serve a purpose as well. I do not believe that the amount of cremated bodies (does any one have an estimated number) pose a significant health risk to us. Inhaling Human remains, come on. How about inhaling the cow particles when the farm to the south of us spreads fertilizer? Or the human feces we inhale near the sewage treatment plant near Pizza Put? I am shocked that people would stoop so low as to try to spread fear among us by talking about these things with minimal facts. I am asking for facts... Anybody got any health risk FACTS... With statistics, please. I consider myself educated and open minded, and would like to engage in two sided debate. Am I the only one who feels that this business deserves consideration for operation? - Chuck LaBombard FUNERAL HOME By Kevin McQuillen, Hinesburg Rd, ma.uillenk@yahoo.com Tue, 17 May 2011 With regard to the science around the crematorium. Why does it fall on us to prove the impact to our health? It should be incumbent on the owner of the facility to prove to the community that there is no health risk. It is after all they who are moving into our neighborhood and it is our health and property values that will suffer if there is environmental degradation. I for one can't dismiss the 1 st hand observations of neighnbors to the crematorium in Tonawanda. Does not sound just like Cow particles to me. 5/23/2011 Page 1 of 1 ray From: Valerie Parker [enviromom7@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 2:35 PM To: ray Subject: Meadowlands Crematorium .... Stud ies/Articles Importance: High Attachments: maloney mercury crematoria lancet (2).pdf; nieschmidt crematoria and amalgams (2).pdf Hi Ray — Please forward this email and files to all of the members of the Development Review Board regarding the proposal for the Meadowlands Crematorium. As I told you this morning, my husband and I are horrified that something as toxic as a crematorium is able to be zoned next to residential communities and schools. The Bellwether School and Nadeau's Playschool in Williston are less than one mile, and there are also multiple subdivisions that sit even closer, less than % mile, from the proposed site. I understand that it was originally zoned as industrial, but it is now a primarily residential area with many young families and this proposal should take this into serious consideration. Attached above are two studies that I received from Dr. Dan Rossignol (ICDRC) who specializes in mercury toxicity: one discusses mercury levels found in the soil near crematoriums, and the second studies levels of mercury found in crematoria workers. Below are other studies/articles about cities and neighborhoods that have faced the pollution and health issues with living next to these establishments. With all of the open land spaces in Vermont, there are so many other options for a safer location for crematoriums ... away from residents and schools. Shouldn't the safety and health of our residents be the highest priority of this state? As you well know, we moved our family up here from Georgia a little over a year ago due to our son's severe chemical sensitivities. We were drawn to Vermont specifically because of its concern about its environment and the health of its people, and the very high rankings for clean air. We picked our home in the wildlife corridor due to the neighborhood restrictions for chemical use and the protective covenants. The town was very adamant about the development of this particular area (SEQ, next to Van Sicklin Rd.) with the stipulation that "no chemicals be used" to protect the wildlife. We are less than one mile from this proposed crematorium, so how is this wildlife being protected now? Here are some other articles and studies done regarding mercury levels and crematoriums: htt p/Lwww.epa,gov1bns1reports stakesdec200�me.rcur_yLReinddl pdf http_J/ww_w.ejnet.orfg/crematoria�eindLpdf http_:/Lwww.boston.com/news nation1articles 2007 12/30/mercury emissions fuel cremation fight/ http:/Lwww. m_sn bc_ .msn.com/idll66567 http://www.memorialsocietybc org/c/g/cremation-report,.html. Please consider the health issues associated with this proposal, and help protect the residents of the SEQ/Meadowlands Dr. area. Thanks so much — Valerie Parker p.s. Please verify that you received this information. 7/15/2011 C RESEARCH LETTERS of his complication, the remainder of the study was abandoned. MIGG contained HLA class I and class II antibodies and monocyte-reactive antibodies of unknown specificity. Mechanisms by which antibodies caused TRALI may be any of the following. Cells of the mononuclear phagocyte system were strongly sensitised with monocyte-reactive antibodies. Binding of these antibodies with their F(ab'),- portion to the antigen and with their Fc-portion of the Fc receptor may lead to cross -linking of the Fc receptors. The result may be either blockade,' or mobilisation of calcium and enhancement of superoxide production,` and secretion of tumour necrosis factor a.° Binding of HLA antibodies may also result in the activation of complement. However, no activation was measured in vitro and in neonates such activation was not seen. Alternatively, recipient -related factors, such as tumour necrosis factor ot-receptor polymorphism, may cause high responder status. So far, we have not been able to substantiate this factor. Adult respiratory distress syndrome in this healthy patient after monocyte-reactive IgG alloantibodies was not due to underlying illness. Such monocyte-reactive antibodies are present in 4% of multiparous women during pregnancy and remain detectable in some after delivery.' Because TRALI is a serious and life -threatening transfusion reaction and the second most important cause of lethal transfusion reactions,' prevention of exposure should be considered in patients to the harmful antibodies by avoiding transfusion of plasma from donors who have known leucocyte antibodies or who have previously been transfused or pregnant. We thank C E Hack for his helpful comments. I Dooren MC, Kuijpers RWAM, Joekes EC, et al. Protection against immune haemolytic disease of newborn infants by maternal monocyte- reactive IgG alloantibodies (anti-HLA DR). Lancet 1992; 339; 1067-70. 2 Kurlander RJ. Blockade of Fc-receptor-mediated binding to U937 cells by murine monoclonal antibodies directed against a variety of surface antigens. I Immunol 1983; 131: 140-47. 3 Macintyre EA, Roberts PJ, Jones M, et al. Activation of human monocytes occurs on cross -linking monocytic antigens to an Fc receptor. Jlmmunol 1989; 142: 2377-83. 4 Martin Th R. Cytokines and the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): a question of balance. Nat Med 1997; 3: 272-73. 5 Sazama K. Reports of 355 transfusion -associated deaths: 1976 through 1985. TramJitsion 1900; 30: 583-90. Departments of Immunohaematology and Blood Cell Chemistry, Central Laboratory of the Netherlands Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service and Laboratory for Clinical and Experimental Immunology, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Haematology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam; Departmerft of Transfusion Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; and Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands (R W A M Kuijpers; e-mail kuijpers( oogk.azr.nl) Mercury in the hair of crematoria workers Susan R Maloney, Carol A Phillips, Allan Mills Mercury is ubiquitous in the environment as a consequence of both natural and industrial emissions. One source of mercury in the atmosphere is from crematoria.' Dental amalgam consists of 50% metallic mercury, and although the risk of mercury poisoning to dentists and their assistants is recognised, little attention has been paid to the final disposal of filled teeth. About 70% of all corpses are now cremated in the UK. It is estimated that one crematorium emits 5.453 kg of mercury per year.' Not only may this be a risk to the health of the general population but also to those who are occupationally involved. One means of determining exposure of individuals to heavy metals is occupation Moen ppm (SE) Mean no of fillings Administration (n=38) 184 (0 20) 684 Cremation operative (n=48) 160(0.25) 585 Groundsman (n-11) 1 47 (0.59) 4.82 Totab 1 68 (0.16) 612 Controls (n=46) 097 (011) 565 Hair mercury concentrations and dental fillings for different occupations within the crematoria analysis of hair, which is useful in population studies because it is non-invasive. Concentrations in hair are correlated with those in liver and kidney,' and record exposure over a longer period of time than do either measurements in blood or urine. We analysed hair samples, at least 1 cm long, from individuals with different posts within the crematorium industry in the UK with cold -vapour atomic absorption spectroscopy (CVAAS). After washing in a non-ionic detergent, rinsing in deionised water, and air -drying, samples were digested consecutively with concentrated nitric acid and 50% v/v hydrogen peroxide. CVAAS was done with a Philips PU9360 continuous -flow vapour system (utilising tin [II] chloride reduction) with a Perkin Elmer SP2900 AA spectrophotometer as detector. All chemicals used were "Aristar" or other low -mercury grades. Samples from a control group, recruited from academic, technical, and maintenance staff from within our institutions, were treated identically. None of the controls were occupationally exposed to mercury emissions and the two groups were matched for average number of fillings and age. Stratification of results showed no gender differences. Concentrations of mercury in hair from the crematoria staff were higher than those in the control group (p=0.0016) and within this group there are also differences between occupations (p=0.024) (table). Administrative staff had the highest concentrations with cremator operatives having the next highest, and those who work in the grounds the lowest. This may be because administrative staff tend to be confined in relatively compact spaces, so that once mercury vapour has entered the room it remains. Of the 36 sites tested, 66% had mean hair concentrations higher than controls. There was no correlation between numbers of cremations at each site with the mean hair -mercury of workers, although the latter were significantly higher (p=0.039) in crematoria carrying out more than 1600 cremations per year than in low -output crematoria. The means for hair mercury concentrations were 1.96 ppm and 1.47 ppm, respectively. Although the critical mercury concentrations for hair are unknown a tolerable concentration is considered to be 6 ppm or less. Of the 97 crematoria workers, 3% had concentrations higher than this. Exposure to mercury vapour by workers in crematoria may be low compared with others who are occupationally exposed but we consider that this study indicates that there is sufficient evidence to warrant emission monitoring and control. Countries such as Sweden already have ongoing projects for installing selenium filters in crematoria and which remove 80-85% of mercury from the emission' 1 Mills A. Mercury and crematorium chimneys. Nature 1990; 346: 615. 2 Burton VJ. Too much mercury. Nature 1991; 351; 704. 3 Toro EC, de Goeij JJM, Bacso J, et al. The significance of hair mineral analysis as a means for assessing internal body burdens of environmental pollutants: results from an IAEA co-ordinated research programme.? Radioanalvt Nucl Chem 1993; 167: 413-21. 4 Hogland WK. Usefulness of selenium for the reduction of mercury emissions from crematoria. ,y Environ Quality 1994; 23: 1364-66. Centre for Healthcare Education, Nene4Jniverslty College, Northampton NN2 7AL, UK (C A Phillips) and Department of Geology, University of Leicester, Leicester 1602 THE LANCET • Vol 352 • November 14, 1998 Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. (1997) 58:744-751 © 1997 Springer-Verlag New York Inc. Effects of Mercury Release from Amalgam Dental Restorations During Cremation on Soil Mercury Levels of Three New Zealand Crematoria A. K. Nieschmidt,' N. D. Kim' 'Department of Earth Sciences and 'Department of Chemistry, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand Received: 25 July 1996/Accepted: 4 February 1997 A vast amount of research has been undertaken in the last 15-20 years on the corrosion reactions occurring in dental amalgam, release of mercury from amalgam restorations, and the toxic effects of this released mercury on the human body (Vimy and Lorscheider 1985; Lusso 1987; Eley and Cox 1988; Hanson and Pleva 1991; Fung and Molvar 1992, Huggins 1992; Mackay 1993). However, one environmental aspect of amalgam dental restorations that has not received a great deal of attention is the release of mercury during cremation. Mercury is liberated during cremation both because dental amalgams are unstable at cremation temperatures (650-700 °C) and because the free mercury metal is highly volatile (Phillips et al. 1994). In New Zealand, 58% of deaths are followed by cremation (International Cremation Statistics 1992) and this figure is likely to rise in the future. This increasing use of cremation as the method of corpse disposal, coupled with the fact that each amalgam restoration is approximately 50% mercury, implies that a significant amount of mercury may be emitted into the environment every year. A handful of reports have been published giving estimates on the amount of mercury released into the atmosphere by crematoria and the concentration of soil mercury found around crematoria in the USA and England (Mills 1990; Kunzler and Andree 1991; Basu et al. 1991; Burton 1991; Hogland 1994; Phillips et al. 1994). However, prior to this work, no such studies had been carried out in New Zealand. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three crematoria were selected for soil mercury analysis, these being the Hamilton Crematorium, the South Auckland Crematorium and the Purewa Crematorium (situated in Remuera, Auckland, New Zealand). Details of operating conditions, number of cremations, and years in operation for each site are given in Table 1. Correspondence to: N. D. Kim 744 C Table 1. Crematorium statistics Site Year cremations Time for opened per year total cremation Temp of Model Fuel furnace cremator type 1' 1964 960 28800 60 min 500-800 *C D & M * Diesel 21982 800 9600 60 min 800-850*C D & M * Gas 3' 1957 1740 66200 60-80 min 500-900 *C D & M * Gas # Site 1: Hamilton, Site 2: South Auckland, Site 3: Purewa * Dowson and Mason twin reflux Soil samples were collected to 5 cm using a soil corer, from five sites around the Hamilton and Purewa crematoria, and three sites around the South Auckland crematorium (ground containing ashes was not disturbed). Samples were digested and analysed for mercury within 24 hr. Three separate samples were taken from each of sampling point, and each one of these samples was analysed in duplicate. For two crematoria (Hamilton and Purewa) the sampling points were selected in such a way that, as much as possible, they encircled the crematorium (depending on the presence of unavoidable features such as driveways and walls). For both sites, one sampling sequence (Site 3) was further extended both downward (0-5 cm, 5-15 cm, and 15-30 cm) and at 5 m intervals leading in a straight line away from the chimney and along the prevailing wind direction. Background mercury levels were determined on the same soil types as those at each crematorium, and are based on samples collected at least 500 m away from each site. The soil type around the Hamilton Crematorium is Horotiu silt loam, which is a free -draining allophanic soil. The soil type around the other two crematoria is Central yellow -brown loam, which is a soil developed on sediments derived largely from volcanic ashes but in places partly from marine rocks (DSIR 1968). After sampling, soils were immediately returned to the laboratory where representative, homogeneous samples were taken for analysis. In order to avoid potential losses of mercury, samples were not oven -dried prior to sampling, but were digested in their field -moist state, with a later correction being applied to account for the measured water content. About 5 g soil was accurately weighed into a 100 mL round -bottom flask, and refluxed gently for 3 hr with 30 mL aqua regia. Cooled samples were filtered through acid -washed (Whatman 541) filter paper into 100 mL volumetric flasks, and made up to the mark with deionised water. Apparatus used was cleaned by acid -washing before and between digestions. Mercury standards were prepared in the same acid matrix as 745 the samples. Samples were analysed for mercury at 253.5 nm (with deuterium background correction) by Cold Vapour Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (CVAAS), using a GBC HG3000 hydride generation unit coupled to a GBC 909 AAS. Reduction of mercury in the flow - through cell was achieved using the stannous chloride procedure. Certified reference materials were digested and analysed with some sample batches as a cross-check on accuracy. Certified soil (GBW 07401, Laboratory of the Government Chemist, England, 1990) containing (32 t 3) ngHg g'and certified stream sediment (GBW 07311, Laboratory of the Government Chemist, England, 1986) containing (72 t 6) ngHg g' represented the lower end of the range, and certified dogfish muscle (DORMA, National Research Council, Canada, 1993) containing (0.798 t 0.074) mgHg kg'represented the higher end. The latter material was used despite the fact that the matrix of DORMA is quite different to soil, and was necessary because certified soil samples containing as much mercury as found around some crematoria were not readily available. Overall, recoveries ranged from 75.2 % to 97.5 %, with a mean value of 83.9% t 4.5 % of the mean certified values. These figures were seen to be acceptable accuracy given the trace nature of the analysis and the fact that the aqua regia extraction is a pseudo -total digestion. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A site plan for Hamilton Crematorium with the average mercury concentrations for each sampling point is provided in Figure 1. The Hamilton Crematorium is situated in a rural environment and the area surrounding the crematorium is flat, relatively unobstructed lawn, with only a small number of trees and shrubs present on one side of the building (at the location of sampling site 1). Mercury concentrations in surface (0-5 cm) soil around the crematorium varied from 190 to 560 µg kg', and averaged 386 µg kg', or about twice the background value for this location (200 µg kg'). Concentrations in the transect leading away from the chimney along the prevailing wind direction increased to a maximum of about three times background levels at 15 m distance and then decreased again (Figure 1). This finding suggests that a measurable amount of the mercury vapour expelled from the crematorium chimney is redeposited within a 30 m radius of the crematorium, giving localised soil contamination. The depth -profile at sampling site 3a reveals that mercury enrichment is confined to the surface 5 cm. Concentrations at sampling site 5 were equivalent to background levels: this was the site furthest away from the chimney and is also situated upwind of the chimney relative to the usual wind direction. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the Hamilton Crematorium is acting as a measurably significant source of mercury to its immediate environment. 746 C Site 1 390 Site 2 [420] 0-5 cm 410 5-15 cm 170 1y0 Q 15-30 cm 120 chimney Site 5 4%lite 400 Background concentration: 200 Site 4 Figure 1. Site plan for Hamilton Crematorium showing average Hg concentrations in soil. All figures are in pg kg' (ppb). (Each number represents the average of 6 analyses). The South Auckland Crematorium is located in a rural environment on an open, rolling landscape. There are only a small number of small trees and scrubs within a 30 m radius of the crematorium. This crematorium has only been in operation for 12 years with a total of 9600 cremations having taken place in that time, and was therefore chosen to investigate whether a noticeable increase in mercury levels, as compared to background levels, was detectable within this relatively short time period. Analysis of three separate sites showed an average increase of only 25 ppb Hg above background concentrations. Results obtained from analysis of soils from the South Auckland Crematorium are given in Table 2. Table 2. Mercury concentrations in soil around the South Auckland Crematorium. Sampling location n Mean mercury concn (pg kg') Std. deviation (µg kg') 95% Conf error (pg kg') Background 6 90 7.1 t 9.8 Site 1 6 110 13.3 t 10.6 Site 2 6 120 13.8 t 11.0 Site 4 6 110 12.2 t 9.8 The Purewa Crematorium is situated in Remuera, Auckland, which is a residential area. A site plan with the average Hg concentrations at each of the sampling points is provided in Figure 2. 747 R Site 1 F4901 230 Site 5 O chimney 180 Site 4 Site 2 F90 850 870 Site 3 810 0-5 cm 850 700 Background 5-15 cm 130 15-30 cm 90 concentration: 140 Figure 2. Site plan for Purewa Crematorium showing average Hg concentrations in soil. All figures are in pg kg' (ppb). (Each number represents the average of 6 analyses). Unlike the Hamilton and South Auckland crematoria, the Purewa Crematorium is not surrounded by an • open grass area. There are only small areas of grass around the crematorium, most of the area is concrete, either footpaths or driveways. There are also a lot of trees in the area. Sites 1 and 2 in particular, were areas where there were a, number of trees present. Immediately adjacent to Site 4 was a small toilet block. The only open areas were Sites 3 and 5. The fact that there were a number of unavoidable objects in the immediate vicinity of the crematorium appears to be reflected in the mercury concentrations obtained. Whereas the mercury concentrations around the other two crematoria were reasonably similar at most of the sampled sites, mercury levels around Purewa varied considerably from site to site. Sampling sites 3 and 5 had the highest mercury concentrations, with Site 3, immediately downwind of the chimney, having up to six times more mercury than background concentrations. Site 2, being situated only slightly off the line of the dominant wind direction but amongst trees, had elevated levels, but only about half those of Site 3. Sites 1 and 4 had concentrations closer to background levels. Similar trends to those evident at Hamilton regarding depth and distance mercury distribution also apply to Purewa. Along a downwind transect from the chimney, mercury concentrations increase with distance, then decrease again with further distance. The depth profile reveals that detectable mercury enrichment is once again confined to surface soil. 748 A summary of the increases in mercury concentrations above background levels at each crematorium (measured on the basis of geometric means) is presented in Table 3, along with other relevant statistics. Table 3. Comparison of the three crematoria Crematorium Geo mean [Hg] Years in Cremations Total above bkground operation per year cremations Sth Auckland 25 µg kg' 12 800 9600 Hamilton 170 µg kg' 30 960 28800 Purewa 350 µg kg' 37 1740 66200 Of the three crematoria studied, Purewa is both the oldest (having opened in 1957) and has the highest cremation rate (1740 cremations per year on average). This is reflected in both the geometric mean mercury concentration (490 ppb as compared to 370 ppb at Hamilton and 115 ppb at South Auckland), and in the average annual increase rate (10 ppb as compared to 5.7 ppb at Hamilton and 2.1 ppb at South Auckland). Tentatively, mercury concentrations in soils around the crematoria appear to be best related to the total number of cremations performed, rather than either the yearly average number of cremations or the total years of operation. Although the number of pairs in our data set are insufficient for derivation of reliable correlation coefficients, the trend evident in the data would appear to suggest that an increase of 100 µg kg' in soil mercury concentrations might, be expected for every 18000 cremations. However, it is also evident by comparison of the estimated amount of mercury emitted from the source with the amount of mercury in soil around the crematoria, that most (99.95%) mercury either never reaches the local soil, or is deposited but re -volatilises. A upper -limit estimate of total mercury emitted from each crematorium can be made on the basis of dental statistics from an Adult Oral Health Survey carried out by Cutress et al. (1979) in conjunction with death statistics by age from the New Zealand Yearbook (1978), and figures for cremations performed at each location. From these figures, the approximate number of cremations carried out for each age bracket can be calculated. By multiplying this figure by the number of filled teeth for each group and the estimated amount of mercury in each of those fillings (taken as 0.6 grams), mercury emissions for each age bracket can be calculated. Full details of these calculations are available from the authors. A method for calculating mercury release from amalgams based on UK figures is also supplied in the literature (Mills 1990; modified by Burton 1991), and was applied for purposes of comparison. The results of these calculations are provided in Table 4. 749 C Table 4. Upper limits for mercury released at source. Figures in brackets relate to the estimate on the basis of previous literature. Crematorium Yearly mercury release (kg) Release over operating lifetime (kg) Sth Auckland 2.64 (2.61) 31.7 (31.3) Hamilton 1.45 (1.44) 43.5 (43.2) Purewa 1.22 (1.20) 45.1 (44.4) Mercury emission values obtained using New Zealand statistics are in remarkably good agreement with figures obtained using a literature - method based on UK emissions (Mills 1990; modified by Burton 1991) (Table 4). This suggests similar emission values may apply to countries of similar socio-economic standards. A lower boundary for mercury emitted from the crematoria can be estimated on the basis of the actual amount of extra mercury found to be present in the soil at each site. This calculation is based on a cylinder of soil of radius 30 m around each chimney and of depth 5 cm, and required measurement of the bulk density of each soil. Presented in Table 5 are calculations of the amount of extra mercury actually present in soil at the Hamilton and Purewa crematoria (mercury levels at the South Auckland site were considered too close to background levels for a reliable estimate to be made). Table 5. Absolute amounts of mercury present in the soil around the Hamilton and Purewa crematoria. Site Volume Soil bulk Geo. mean Background Extra over Total Location of soil density [Hg] [Hg] Background mass W (kg m') (mg kg') (mg kg') (mg kg') Hg (g) Hamilton 141.37 880 370 200 170 21.15 Purewa 141.37 1080 490 140 350 53.44 From the soil receptor calculations it can be seen that soil in the immediate vicinity (30 m radius, 0.05 m depth) of each chimney retains only 21.2 g mercury in the case of Hamilton, and 53.4 g mercury in the case of Purewa (Table 5). These amounts equate to only 0.05% of the likely total mercury emissions for both crematoria (Table 4), a result which suggests that either (a) most mercury emitted from crematoria never reaches the local soil, or (b) emitted mercury is deposited in reasonable amounts in local soil, but is able to re -volatilise relatively efficiently. Volatilisation is known to be an important part of the global mercury cycle, accounting for the loss of significant amounts of the metal from soils (Fergusson 1990). 750 Using cremation data available from the International Cremation Statistics (1992) and the calculations of Burton (1991) it is possible to estimate that New Zealand emissions are likely to total about 22.8 kg Hg per year and that global annual mercury emissions would total 6962 kg. Globally, atmospheric mercury emissions from crematoria of this magnitude would account for about 0.8 % of total anthropogenic mercury emissions (based on the estimates of Nriagu and Pacyna 1988 and Nriagu 1989). REFERENCES Basu MK, Wilson HJ (1991) Mercury risk from teeth. Nature 349:109. Burton VJ (1991) Too much mercury. Nature 351:704. Cutress TW, Hunter PBV, Davis PB, Beck DJ, Croxson LJ (1979) Adult Oral Health and Attitudes to Dentistry in New Zealand. Medical Research Council of New Zealand, Wellington. DSIR (1968) Soils of New Zealand; Part 1, Soil Bureau Bulletin 26:1. Eley BM, Cox SW (1988) Mercury poisoning from dental amalgam —an evaluation of the evidence. J Dentistry 16: 90-95. Fergusson JE (1990) The heavy elements: chemistry, environmental impact and health effects, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK. Fung YK, Molvar MP (1992) Toxicity of Hg from dental environment and from amalgam restorations. Clin Toxicol 30:49-61. Hanson M, Pleva J (1991) The dental amalgam issue. A review. Experiential 47:9-22, Hogland WKH (1994) Usefulness of selenium for the reduction of mercury emission from crematoria. J Environ Qual 23:1364-1366. Huggins HA (1992) Overview of the amalgam issue. J Colorado Dental Assoc 71:1-6. International Cremation Statistics (1992) 58: 144-155. Pharos International. Kunzler P, Andree M (1991) More mercury from crematoria. Nature 349: 746-747. Lusso A (1987) Toxikologie der Amalgame, Schweiz. Monatsschrift fuer Zeitmedizin 97: 1271-1279. Mackay R (1993) Is dental amalgam safe? Scientifically there is more than reasonable doubt. J Nutr Environ Med, December issue: 5-12. Mills A (1990) Mercury and the crematorium chimneys. Nature 346:615. New Zealand Official Yearbook (1978) Dept of Statistics, Wellington, NZ. Nriagu JO (1989) A global assessment of natural sources of atmospheric trace metals. Nature 338:4749. Nriagu JO, Pacyna JM (1988) Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soils by trace metals. Nature 333: 134- 139. Phillips CA, Gladding T, Maloney S (1994) Clouds with a quicksilver lining. Chem Brit, August: 646-656. Vimy MJ, Lorscheider FL (1985) Intra-oral air mercury released from dental amalgam. J Dental Res 64:1069-1071. W1.1I Pagel of 3 ray From: Charrington, Peter [Peter.Charrington@stantec.com] Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 11:42 AM To: ray Cc: Leinwohl, Jon V RE: Technical vi Subject Review Info e Ray I see the project being divided up into three tasks: Data Review - $1,420.00 Possible attendance at Zoning Board Hearing - $2,900.00 Preparing a Final Opinion - $850.00 I don't see the need for any dispersion modeling as the two most important issues to review will be particulates being emitted from the stack and the determination of any discernable odors from the operation of the furnace during the cremation process. If the applicant has to get an air permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, the requirements that no odors or particulates can leave the property will be included in the permit requirements. However, these types of issues usually end up being more emotional that logical in terms of satisfying the public's concerns. My job would be to present the requirements to operate and based on information from other locations where they are located, include that information in the report. As I indicated my hourly billing rate is $160/hr and if additional review was necessary as a result of any questions raised during the Zoning Board Hearing, it would be billed at that rate. How would you like me to submit this? Peter R. Charrington, P.E. Principal Engineer Stantec 400 Davis Drive Suite 400 Plymouth Meeting PA 19462 Ph: (484) 322-0301 Fx: (484)322-0302 Cell: (610) 945-6405 peter.charrington@stantec.com stantec.com The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately. (O Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: ray [mailto:rbelair@sburl.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 1:11 PM To: Charrington, Peter Cc: Paul Conner Subject: Technical Review Info Hi Peter, Attached is the information I have about the crematorium equipment. Some other information is below. When you reply, please reply to all so my boss can see your reply. Thanks. 6/28/2011 Page 2 of 3 Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 802-846-4106 1. Equipment Type........................................................ A. Model No. ........................................................... B. Underwriters Laboratories Listing and File No... Model Power -Pak II IE43-PPII 87E8; MH14647 2. Dimensions 12'-6'/2"x6'-8" A. 14' - 6Y2" (4.43 m) Footprint............................................................. 6' -5" (1.96 m) 8'-4"(2.54m) B. Maximum 25 3/4" H x 39" W (655 mm x 990 Length................................................. mm) C. Maximum Width.................................................. D. Maximum Height................................................. E. Chamber Loading Opening................................. 3. 24,000 lbs. (11,000 kg) Weight....................................................................... 4. Utility/Air Requirements A. Gross Gas Input, Natural or LP Gas................... Running Gas Pressure, Natural Gas.................. 2,000,000 BTU/hr. (2,100,000 kJ/h) 2,500,000 BTU/hr. (2,600,000 kJ/h) if equipped with preheat burner 7 inches (180 mm) water column or greater 11 inches (280 mm) water column or greater 230 volt, 30 or 10, 50/60 hz (other available) 2,500 cfm (70 standard m3/min) 6/28/2011 C Page 1 of 2 ray From: John Hinckley [John. Hinckley@rsginc.com] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:14 AM To: ray Subject: RE: Meadowlands Business Complex - Crematorium Ray, Thank you for sending the information. Here is the breakdown for the estimate: 1) Review applicant information and assess coWliance with South Burlington performance standards and Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations.($250' 2) Perform site inspection (not mandatory, but recommended). $380 3) Estimate emissions for critical pollutants whose emission data is readily available. Emission Levels will be compared with Vermont emission thresholds for permitting and air dispersion modeling, $3 0 4) Conduct dispersion modeling (of the proposed design) of pertinent pollutants whose emission data is readily available. We will use the model to estimate pollutant concentrations at residences within a 1 mile radius of the proposed crematorium (study area size can be adjusted). $1,800 a. Model mercury, formaldehyde, and particulate matter b. Model a number of odorous compounds S) Prepare summary memorandum, including a. Summary of work completed (data sources, rnodels used, methodology followed, results) b. Wind Rose graphic showing probability of wind speed and direction derived with Burlington Airport data. c. Up to three maps showing pollutant concentration contours superimposed on the site and surrounding area.�$1,150 if modeling work is described and maps are included'$600 if modeling/maps not reflected Please call me if you have questions. /1 Thanks John From: ray [mailto:rbelair@sburl.com] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:48 AM To: John Hinckley Subject: FW: Meadowlands Business Complex - Crematorium FYI Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 802-846-4106 From: Scott Homsted [mailto:scott.homsted@krebsandlansing.com] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 10:30 AM To: ray Cc: Steve Gregory; edwardpbiggins@yahoo.com 6/ 16/2011 Page 2 of 2 Subject: Meadowlands Business Complex - Crematorium Hi Ray, As requested, attached are copies of the charts shown during our presentation to the DRB regarding the proposed crematorium use at the Meadowlands Business Complex. We've also attached a letter from the manufacturer that addresses some of the issues raised. Scott Homsted, P.E. Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, Vermont 05446 Scott.Homsted@jgebsandlansing.com 6/ 16/2011 Page 1 of 3 ray From: Charrington, Peter [Peter.Charrington@stantec.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 2:34 PM To: ray Cc: Paul Conner; Leinwohl, Jon Subject: RE: Technical Review Info Attachments: charrington 01.26.11.doc Ray; Thanks for the opportunity to work with the City of South Burlington on the evaluation of the cremation equipment proposed to be used by the applicant. I have attached a copy of my resume for your review. The information provided certainly gives enough to determine if the Cremation furnace can operate without exceeding the air standards of Vermont. The primary concerns are relative to dust/soot or odors being perceived beyond the property boundary of the applicant. The general review of the information provided showed that there is an opacity monitor attached to the furnace for monitoring dust/soot which cannot exceed 20% for more than 3 minutes on start up of the system an may have no visual emissions leaving the stack for any extended period of time. The furnace fired by natural gas will achieve a temperature high enough to eliminate any odors from the operation and the emission of any heavy metals (i.e., mercury) will be minimal. I don't see where any dispersion modeling will be necessary. I would request from the manufacturer if any other units have been placed in other locations in Vermont and then contact them and or review their air permit application, if any, with the State of Vermont. My billing rate is $160/hr and after I review this a little more I'll send you a quote broken down into 4 or so phases (i.e., data review, regulatory review, contact with the manufacturer re other installations and that area's experience, attendance at a zoning Board hearing if necessary). Should you want me to quote on anything else, please let me know. Peter R. Charrington, P.E. Principal Engineer Stantec 400 Davis Drive Suite 400 Plymouth Meeting PA 19462 Ph: (484) 322-0301 Fx: (484) 322-0302 Cell: (610) 945-6405 peter.charrington@stantec.com stantec.com The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: ray [mailto:rbelair@sburl.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 1:11 PM To: Charrington, Peter Cc: Paul Conner Subject: Technical Review Info Hi Peter, 6/28/2011 Page 2 of 3 Attached is the information I have about the crematorium equipment. Some other information is below. When you reply, please reply to all so my boss can see your reply. Thanks. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 802-846-4106 1. Equipment Type........................................................ A. Model No. B. Underwriters Laboratories Listing and File No... 2. Dimensions A. Footprint............................................................. B. Maximum Length................................................. C. Maximum Width.................................................. D. Maximum Height................................................. E. Chamber Loading Opening................................. Model Power -Pak II IE43-PPII 87E8; MH14647 12'-6'/2"x6'-8" 14'- 61/2" (4.43 m) 6' -5" (1.96 m) 8'-4"(2.54m) 25 3/4" H x 39" W (655 mm x 990 mm) 3. 24,000 lbs. (11,000 kg) Weight....................................................................... 4. Utility/Air Requirements A. Gross Gas Input, Natural or LP Gas................... Running Gas Pressure, Natural 2,000,000 BTU/hr. (2,100,000 kJ/h) 2,500,000 BTU/hr. (2,600,000 kJ/h) if equipped with preheat burner 7 inches (180 mm) water column or greater 11 inches (280 mm) water column or greater 230 volt, 30 or 10, 50/60 hz (other available) 6/28/2011 Page 3 of 3 Gas.................. Running Gas Pressure, LP Gas.......................... B. Electrical Supply................................................. C. Air Supply............................................................ 2,500 cfm (70 standard m3/min) 6/28/2011 Page 1 of 1 ray From: Valerie Parker [enviromom7@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 2:35 PM To: ray Subject: Meadowlands Crematorium .... Stud ies/Articles Importance: High Attachments: maloney mercury crematoria lancet (2).pdf; nieschmidt crematoria and amalgams (2).pdf Hi Ray — Please forward this email and files to all of the members of the Development Review Board regarding the proposal for the Meadowlands Crematorium. As I told you this morning, my husband and I are horrified that something as toxic as a crematorium is able to be zoned next to residential communities and schools. The Bellwether School and Nadeau's Playschool in Williston are less than one mile, and there are also multiple subdivisions that sit even closer, less than %2 mile, from the proposed site. I understand that it was originally zoned as industrial, but it is now a primarily residential area with many young families and this proposal should take this into serious consideration. Attached above are two studies that I received from Dr. Dan Rossignol (ICDRC) who specializes in mercury toxicity: one discusses mercury levels found in the soil near crematoriums, and the second studies levels of mercury found in crematoria workers. Below are other studies/articles about cities and neighborhoods that have faced the pollution and health issues with living next to these establishments. With all of the open land spaces in Vermont, there are so many other options for a safer location for crematoriums ... away from residents and schools. Shouldn't the safety and health of our residents be the highest priority of this state? As you well know, we moved our family up here from Georgia a little over a year ago due to our son's severe chemical sensitivities. We were drawn to Vermont specifically because of its concern about its environment and the health of its people, and the very high rankings for clean air. We picked our home in the wildlife corridor due to the neighborhood restrictions for chemical use and the protective covenants. The town was very adamant about the development of this particular area (SEQ, next to Van Sicklin Rd.) with the stipulation that "no chemicals be used" to protect the wildlife. We are less than one mile from this proposed crematorium, so how is this wildlife being protected now? Here are some other articles and studies done regarding mercury levels and crematoriums: http://www.epa.gov/bns/reports/stakesdec2005/mercury/Reindi.pdf http://www.ejnet.org/crematoria/reindl.pdf http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/12/30/mercury_emissions_fuel_cremation_fight/ http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16656749/ http://www.memorialsocietybc.org/c/g/cremation-report.htmI Please consider the health issues associated with this proposal, and help protect the residents of the SEQ/Meadowlands Dr. area. Thanks so much — Valerie Parker p.s. Please verify that you received this information. 6/7/2011 CPage 1 of 1 ray From: Scott Homsted[scott.homsted@krebsandlansing.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 9:53 AM To: ray Subject: Meadowlands Business Complex Hi Ray, Due to some personnel changes at O'Brien Brothers Agency and O'Brien Meadowland, LLC, please use me as the contact person for correspondence going forward on this project. I will coordinate with the Owners/Applicants for any necessary signatures etc. Thank you. Scott Homsted, P.E. Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, Vermont 05446 Scott.Homsted@krebsandlansinp,.com 6/1 /2011 Emissions Comparison ■ilia : _ _. Legend: 8 ■ Residential �. 7 Fireplace 6 �- a� 5 ❑ Diesel Truck 4 ° 3 ❑ Restaurant y 2 Cooking 100 w1 Hamburgers Per Hour Particulate Nitrogen Volatile Organic ❑ IEE/ALL Matter Oxides Compounds Cremator �YIjkILVAFTI A From the attached emissions evaluation of a diesel truck, a car and a cremator, we created a graphical presentation that visually enhances a comparative overview of the emissions output. 25.00 20.00 15.00 N a Z 0 10.00 a 5.00 0.00 22.20 7.16 1.86 0.05 0.1 0.8 0.52 0.2 0.17 OM 0.001 Particulate Carbon Monoxide Nitrogen Oxide Hydrocarbon POLLUTANT i 0 Car ■ Diesel Truck O Cremator 0!BRIEN,0 01. B R O T H E R S May 6, 2011 To Whom It May Concern: ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT The property owners- O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC of Units 4-5 & 8 and HLE World HQ, LLC of Units 9-10 at Meadowlands Business Complex have agreed to allow the owner of Unit 7 to utilize their parking spaces at 472 Meadowlands Drive as specified below during off peak (6 pm — 7 am M-F and anytime on weekends). • Parking ■ Units 4-5 & 8 (O'Brien Meadowlands) • Unit 7 ■ Units 9-10 (HLE World HQ, LLC) = 30 parking spaces = 10 parking spaces = 20 parking spaces 60 parking spaces off peak (6 pm — 7 am M-F and anytime on weekends) Please contact us at 658-5000 if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, Stephanie O'Brien O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407-2184 Edward Biggins HLE World HQ, LLC 472 Meadowlands Drive, Unit 10 South Burlington, VT 05403 SERVING O U R 121 C O M M U N I T Y ' S R E A L E S TAT E N E E D S S I N C E 1 9 5 8 oPPOR,U„,;,� 1855 Williston Road - PO Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 802.658.5000 • fax 658.5002 obrienbrothersagency.com r sh southburlington PLANNING & ZONING December 13, 2011 Larry R. Michaels, COO O'Brien Sugarwoods, LLC 1855 Williston Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: New Tenant— 472 Meadowland Drive, Unit # 8 Dear Mr. Michaels: This is in response to your request dated December 9, 2011 requesting approval under your umbrella permit for a new tenant at 472 Meadowlands Drive. The new tenant is "HLE World HQ" and will occupy 5,000 sq. ft. It is classified as a manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components use. This new tenant will replace a vacant space with no approved use. An analysis of the parking demand and traffic generation has been conducted and this new use is hereby approved. Since the new tenant results in a change in use, a zoning permit must be obtained. Should you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Paul Conner Director of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com ZONING USE COMPLIANCE REQUEST FORM DATE: December 9, 20I I BUSINESS NAME: O'Brien Sugarwoods, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: I855 Williston Road, South Burlington VT 05407 CONTACT PERSON: Larry R. Michaels, COO ADDRESS OF PROPOSED USE: Meadowlands Business Complex 472 Meadowlands Drive, Unit # 8 South Burlington VT EXISTING ZONE: Industrial/Open Space ESTIMATED # OF ON SITE EMPLOYEES: Unit 8 is being purchased by HLE World HQ who currently owns Unit's 9 & I0. This additional Unit is an expansion of their current space and will 5 additional employees. / DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY, INCLUDING ANCILLIARY USES This is an expansion of the current business and will be used primarily for distribution and light manufacturing (for example packaging of undergarments). Approved? Yes No PAGE 1 OF 1 i cu lA . ZONING USE COMPLIANCE REQUEST FORM DATE: 5-1044 1 t) BUSINESS NAME: MAILING ADDRESS 4-1,. r� v 1 V Sct IT( "1 1 CONTACT PERSON '- ` r� ADRESS OF PROPOSED USE: Meadowlands Business Complex 472 Meadowlands Drive South Burlington VT EXISTING ZONE: Ind/Open Space ESTIMATED # OF ON SITE EMPLOYEES -3 r / DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY, INCLUDING ANCILLIARY USES rr�, 11►,,% 1010 southburlington PLANNING & ZONING May 7, 2009 Josie Palmer Leavitt PO Box 2184 1855 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 472 Meadowlands Drive Dear Ms. Palmer Leavitt Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Administrative Officer on May 7, 2009 (effective 5/7/09). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tell 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com City of South Burlington Application for Site Plan Review Date: 4/30/09 i Permit Number SP-- Applicant and Owner: O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC PO Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 (phone) (802) 658-5002 (fax) Location of last recorded deed (book and pq): Book 758 Pg 461 Contact Person: Josie Palmer Leavitt PO Box 2184 1855 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 (802) 658-5002 Email: josie obrienbrothersagency.com Project Street Address: 472 Meadowland Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Tax Parcel ID NO. 1705-00107 Parcel Size 348,480 sq ft Project Description: General Project Description: To add ten concrete block pillars in front of the building at each entrance area. There are five triangular jet outs on the building and these pillars will be placed underneath these in the mulched landscaped area. The reason for this addition is to comply with the Meadowlands Business Park Association guidelines of having a masonry component on or around the building. Please see attached sketch of pillars. Existing Uses on Property: The existing use is consistent with the original approval for the property including up to 18,750 sq ft for general office and 41,250 sq ft for other approved activities including: Contractor or Building trade facility, light manufacturing, manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials and components, printing and binding production facilities, research facility or laboratory Proposed uses of Property: The purpose of this amendment application is for one minor modification. To add 10 3'-2" x 20" x 20" Column Pillars; Height is 3'-2"+/-; Blue Stone Cap 2' x 2' and 2" high; All going in front of the building, in the mulched landscape area of each entrance way. Total Building Square Footage 50, 000 square feet Height of building & number of floors The building is a single story with mezzanine. 10,000 square feet of mezzanine area is proposed. The elevation for the building will be 35 feet. Number of Residential Units Non Applicable Number of employees & company vehicles 30 office employees + 40 non -office employees = 70 total employees. No more than 20 company vehicles proposed Other Non Applicable LOT COVERAGE: Total Parcel Size: 348, 480 sq ft Building: Existing 14.3% / 50,000 sq ft Proposed: 0 % / 0 sq ft Total sq ft of other impervious surfaces on site (i.e. driveways, patios, decks) Existing 38.5%/ 133,808sq ft Proposed 0 % / 0 sq ft Front yard (along each street) Existing: 0% / 0 sq ft Proposed: 0 / 0 sq ft Total area to be disturbed during construction: Less than 100 sq ft Estimated total cost of the improvements: Attach sketch plan or site plan Building (including interior renovations): $0 Landscaping: $8,750.00 Other site improvements (please list with cost): $0 Estimated Traffic: Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): 389 VTE AM Peak Hour for entire property (in and out): 53 VTE PM Peak Hour for entire property (in and out): 53 VTE Peak Hours of Operation: 8 AM -5 PM Peak Days of Operation: Monday — Friday Estimated Project Completion Date: Fall 2008 ABUTTERS: Please see attached list Site Plan Application 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 4 Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SKINATURE OF P PERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: J REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board n Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: VoMplete ❑ Incomplete i S/1/o ctor of Planning & Zoning or Designee 5 ` \ Lot 10 5 miner lee .hint urc � r Ev SUN /5 ✓en rule ASii=JJG f9' m •J.. av' ua7. J87 P. 4J9 oa by h JJa Bs E_. SNN'M R y Inv out JJQBI A .JJ9. 75• a� Ev. S— NN h GN.:r.JJ1. S01.C' B-Arv. m.JJ7o?• M' Now JJ7 Rbn. J-w 0• =h»/o�d cwbcrebr • B' by euI.JJI A' . a/ 1 1 Dritie f 24-A05 -''r—� r O erdvw-r -- i _ M11 X I bJOgrT---.•15 .ea. See ^ CLASS // er A arrays ✓�� ¢� "'P � ��`` �� saw / f/ 1.LL N/ I / ' I t Munson EorthM-09 Corp. / .:?'toadwnr aaa r1/ / r pad �n/t_ fhol .yp-' o o f cw,abacee,. t I Prgoosed abngr/i� l YrY 4' / � I Existing Pond /C L9iew 1 I I dt/PJ• / l � ' f "; ,, / / l j steael I 211 U, /Awph * \ \` --�_., ' l / � T / • i Prgovs�6pddi19 / I // i rre\I/I�j ? �x //J c V ccn to CLASS // Wet/ands bock pA/on Two / Ii [ a pp$$ Awelr/ FA~/ l l ✓� /) b ^j Refer to Canditimd \ { s aseA era! /// r; (T Use Deter bt/on No. 9t roU e rr(JPJ i j ��` /. / I I 1 Yi%J 2001-398 dated l l/ / r 1 f ''; ^� 11/1/02 rw- \ odd't,w of drfamot/m. No new dsturbonce ofd 3 ,.' �. r// n»t/Dods Nand buff - ' d // proposed s�ie l l / tl/ r AMA Aew I j1 1 I 11 It mr�aib of peer f Lot J r Sum- /ce Joint ✓eneure Vol J87 P. IJ9 ` 1 t1I 11 1 fI- w /, I II1 I I 1 I I nla'� /; 1 II i I I I III h i / /Z �• - �� -�L i / // /M/vyaarl/ / 1 I I I i� Notes. 1As III \ 1 \ 11 \t--_ \ /i �•-cC� /Y,:' / / 1 1 .rrmw vooaee ar.L... vo+ - 9,edw.or vror• er r,.�w, a,sh� mrae AH lx 1994 h wpm.. Jens An. ore h ew atr cf .a.m eMwyw, tor.d B.�s unm s t 1a r A\ 11\\I eh° �^61i�/ \ tea:.-.s-.t'�"y Atkrapad E`./tendad / Detmtim ?and y/ / l {• - - ` /l/ i/ iirT /IV ' — — — — fora wn:..wa. / Ne. —.&m r/m non .t.cig s. � ,,\``a ,,\� ,`•��� � \��\� i ii � / yi== ` �\\ • i - - _ _ vw - _ �{� '/ Grata )\�\' ii{ \ •.•, \�\\\\ i Of Door.. / Lot 2 1 �111 Y' Muns Earth11111 I / amp • \. �JII/ii/�i/ i�/rim Jjjjl'ltllllljll MO ng Corp _ _ - -- A�rni � I 11 i e 651 Po9e 1�7 raw 14 2003 t i ` `•��=��= \ �� '^/i %t A e: aLv i --.__.... 8j. 1A•Q3- W �i 655.63• i Wars , Location Moo Owndr A• Applicant Information: OVKev Meaob$Oo dr. [LC P.0 86r 2/84 south BrN/1n9tan, yr e54W Areas• rotol area - ROO eons (714e80 sq. R.) Zonma.. bldistNol and Open .;vote IarArg Db&fct Lot Cowrag Irpwvar= su6ee A— 1r MQ AN—d fb/Iq a N. t! AIA I°bemarf a et Garr 1 MIA 54007 it I M.ai im A--44ftft J40;V at S M N A r-M 1540M st I U. SOR tYsrflsd Lb�epe lAOx Parkins f0,000 sgeR IftM se/Distnbutian/Cmtroctcr • 1 spoce/2.000 sq ft. = 10 spaces 16I750 sptf.. OhR•e space I J5 spoces/1,000 so It - 66 spaces 10, 000 sq. R, w—house, (—ze—e) -1 sp—/r Z, 000 W R. = 5 spaces Total Spocm Requlrod — 91 spaces Prgpoard Pooling Svotes = 100 (inc//5 handicapped) Legend Array nor pater — — — — Pm—' u,a °- B19.1t of fty JJ. Eaiarhq yovnd cmras 0 Eaarhe sv.r- mannds � wry cores eeh —f--- Emmg EanNg w>M /hs iqr� Ear'af/Oa AyJanf /.ors bra 6 rhq fi�cr � Nor lump>a Nov ca.er..ara sit /anc- Ns. cmabucfna+ /tern Mcirg O' 70' ID, M, 120' 160' 2X' Bar SCOie 1. - 40• twit s.A y✓if mJ r cv, lM.r I aafaMa rfonpe a.n ra..sae cendw.fr sows a°�nsn or unir , aaevrm s.A .• ..• covdw.as aaea a.A vawna a.i gniOf've rws n�Z ,.an.e Goa ara,e ao soya �a.n } ` .�, �'afaA Meer' ? DDeebn k�r Site P/an _ JBa - __^. LL}I .d —JSS -• "ATM _ "�,-' . ...--,•�"�� t Novner d MOrie Dubois Checked Meadow/ands Business Complex \� ✓d. 179 P. 126 Scale 1 - ". Y __ /�01. m b " Nor ,rwe aeaaF SUN /e =swafai= 9im.J.JOT pat¢ Mrljsans Lot 2 Meadow/and Industrial Park tt t Rhbsrte ry Lorry i Crherte Broino-d Ptojoaet `718 472 Meada.fand Or- South Burtn9fon, ✓ mt Y6JP.JW Vol. 211 P. 281 XWBS B• I.i/NS/NC Conmlhizg 6'ngxneers, Inc. , fB4 Alain Stree4 Colchester, Vermont 0"46 r southurlington PLANNING & ZONING November 4, 2009 Josie Palmer Leavitt O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. PO Box 2184 1855 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 472 Meadowland Drive Dear Ms. Leavitt: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Administrative Officer on November 4, 2009 (effective 11/4/09). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, iJna Bea,gley Planning and Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 6 Permit Number SP-- G CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC P.O. Box 2184 1855 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 (p) (802) 658-5002 (f) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page#) Book 758 Page 461 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax# Same as above 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Josie Palmer Leavitt O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. P.O. Box 2184 1855 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 (p) (802) 658-5002 (f) 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 472 Meadowland Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1705-00107 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) The existing use is consistent with the original approval for the property including up to 18,750 s.f. for general office and 41,250 s.f. for other approved activities including: Contractor or building trade facility Light Manufacturing Manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components Printing & binding production facilities Research facility or laboratory b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) The purpose of this amendment application is for a minor modification. The modification is to create a 30' x 30' x 6' high dumpster enclosure to be located in the back of the building across from Unit 9 & 8, which will then require us to re -strip the parking spots in the back, we will not be adding any additional parking spots just moving the existing ones due to the dumpster enclosure. c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain The building is 60,000 Square Feet d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) The building is a single story with mezzanine. 10,000 s.f. of mezzanine area. The elevation for the building will be 35 feet. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not Applicable f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 30 office employees + 40 non -office employees = 70 total employees. No more than 20 company vehicles proposed. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Not Applicable 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 348,480 Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing 0 % / 0 sq. ft. Proposed 0 % / 0 sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 % / 0 sq. ft. Proposed 0 % / 0 sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 0 % / 0 sq. ft. Proposed 0 % / 0 sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 2 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (Including interior renovations): $ 6000.00 b) Landscaping: $ 0 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) n/a 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) 389 VTE b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) 53 VTE c) P.M. peak hour for entire property (in and out) 55 VTE 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE Fall/Winter 2009 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowners. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) The owners of record are provided on a separate attached sheet. 3 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I " x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. ,Il S TURE OF APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board laming& Zoning` I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: ----- Complete Incomplete t �l� -Z67 Director of Planning & Zoning 6r Designee Date 4 1) I I Scott & Roberto Aar 1-9ton W 209 PAM tell 44MM. Zero 16 10 CPA maw rmnM dpn, See Delon / LWy & C470110 Branord Itl 211 P.787 Zoning plglFlct llo+nr R 4be L�rboir Nx. 179 P. 126 E,. 9IN F7 ------------------ Ri r M9L 75' s� B�hv h=JJT 1' Bfiv h�JJT OT' • B. /n v. oN=JJl �s 6� CLASS N V 1 I / I I Existing Pond I I I I II � i J i Trion I I S� li j CLASS // Wellands I Refer to i lian N Use Delerminolion No. -,007-J98 doled odd'fiond information. No new d.'sturbonce Of C/ass fl wet/ands d AJ r we proposed, buffer —�y prgoased Sea l l I RMoco/e e41kg 20' P,.b,lrra t rew elP�144' Isar of Cbss a I /�� Ice ,k, . lvntn S8Lo!7 P. Afa!ew ! IN, & fro/ . e d>,y siwy Prgo,vty % n .Mown ora Hom . Mo•+ enl/tnrd 7/e..aUwbnd fLshess Py. - SAdwsw>+ PW' by 71uaba C-n I, g foghe r; abed Apa TJ /996 rK. ~ h 1p..n, J86 P.g, 98 h ln, C'fy or 5o.ln fkwl q- Gard R--. t LOCOM017 M0,0 O*w d AAWxwl kl/OrnW On: 09rion Meodpw0andac LLC P.O. Box 2184 South &'Wilglom VT 05403 Are Total area - 8 00 acres (J48, t80 sq /I ) Zan:W Mduslriol and open Space Z-i g District Lot C01WIM Eebl' O aL A f,bf Pbn• 1 0 sL :OI[ A Pgo.aad 9RCtlq s0 lelA .117R Pr4.PSM Powrnw/ a AR0716 af. 1Ff1! Ili A 1aa+co Molest .sBS.f xx Freel Co 7A Ae kin x0, 000 sq. N. 0brehouse/Dislnbulion/Con/roctor , l spoce/?, 000 sq ft 10 spaces 18,750 sq /I. Office spoce , 35 spoces/1, 000 sq ft. - 66 spaces 10. 000 sq. ft. warehouse (mezzanine) •1 -Votes/1, 000 sq ft - 5 -Votes Told Spaces Requked - 91 spaces Proposed Parking Spaces - 100 (krcL/5 nond/capped) L eoend y-ft/Pohf — - - Pr I, I:. or Rignf of aby JJI f brhg going conl.ur m frbrhg s.wa mounds ❑ c behg .dan e.,h s Farb%q JswM /he - - -IY- - f/bfhg -1i, fh, M �( pQ Ewbfipn hyd'.nr / wPIM qfN �r fevfhg wood fine -----ap_----_ New % /M,d 9- O. Q e N / mdrod, • New c.n1-- .01 f— N�w —1-clion limit / 6v 0V, ,O' 80' 120' 160' TW' Bogy Scole 1- = e0• Oclobw ! T009 alvmP,fr .nc/.,.r, ,wh ac1P f 20M Pill.„ Apr# a 2006 4 roil / c,. Vn/f ! .u1 aforog, wh 4preNsed /0 1 1/LU y.y /�, 2007 corrdrn,er Podx P.�am,nf .f Unif ! sn/ronce s+n 6/bi F,fiuorY6. 2007 !' r t' cmWnsw P.d, swn -pfwmaw M 2006 Porihq �.n.n 7 /b7 X N T AND MANAGEMENT 4 t N C Y I N C April 28, 2009 Ray Belair Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC 472 Meadowlands Drive Units 1-10 (Pillars) Site Plan Application #SP-08-99 — Certificate of Occupancy Dear Ray: Enclosed, please find the Certificate of Occupancy Application for Site Plan #SP-08-99 regarding the pillars. All 10 pillars have been installed and are ready for you to do your inspection. If you want me to meet you on site, just let me know and I will coordinate it. Should you need anything else from me, please contact me at our office at 658-5000 or by email josie@obrienbrothersagency.com. Since y, s ialmer Leavitt Real Estate Developing and Marketing Manager O'Brien Brothers Agency Enclosure: 2 SERVING OUR COMMUNITY'S REAL ESTATE NEEDS SINCE 1958 0-PP0 A-UNW- 1855 Williston Road • PO Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 • 802.658.5000 • fax 658.5002 obrienbrothersagency.com ( #S P-06-33 #S P-06-34 18. The restrictions on scheduled truck vehicle trip ends on the subject property shall be as follows: 12:00 A.M - 5:59A.M. 6:00 A.M. —11:00 P.M 11:01 P.M —11:59 P.M. Monday no truck operations no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends Tuesday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends vehicle trip ends Wednesday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends vehicle trip ends Thursday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends vehicle trip ends Friday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends vehicle trip ends Saturday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions no truck operations vehicle trip ends 7:00 A.M - 15:00 P.M no trucking operations 5:01 P.M — 11:59 P.M. Sunday no truck operations no truck operations no truck operations 19. This approval is for the following uses which are currently permitted uses in the Industrial & Open Space Zoning District: general office, contractor or building trade facility, light manufacturing, manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials and components, printing & binding production facilities, and research facility or laboratory. If the land development regulations change so that any of the above uses are no longer permitted, then those uses which are no longer permitted shall no longer be approved. 20. This approval is conditioned on a maximum of 90 parking spaces available and 55 PM peak hour vehicle trip ends. 21. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Director of Planning and Zoning prior to any change of any tenant in the building. The Director of Planning and Zoning shall approve the proposed new tenant only if the proposed combination of uses fits within the limitations established in stipulation #20 above. In making her determination, the Director of Planning and Zoning shall utilize the parking standards in Tables 13-1 through13-6 in the Land Development Regulations, and trip generation rates contained in the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual. If a use proposed does not fit clearly within any of these standards, or if a shared parking concept is proposed in order to meet the parking limit, the applicant shall obtain approval from the Development Review Board for the proposed use. 22. Any changes to the final plat plan shall require approval of the South Burlington Development Review Board. 23. The final plat plan (site plan) shall be recorded in the land records within 180 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. MEE I C Permit Number SP- 10 - U I CITY OF SOUTH BUF LINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC P.O. Box 2184 1855 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 (p) (802) 658-5002 (f) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page#) Book 758 Page 461 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax# Same as above 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Josie Palmer Leavitt O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. P.O. Box 2184 1855 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 (p) (802) 658-5002 (f) 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 472 Meadowland Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1705-00107 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) The existing use is consistent with the original approval for the property including up to 18,750 s.f. for general office and 41,250 s.f. for other approved activities including: Contractor or building trade facility Light Manufacturing Manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components Printing & binding production facilities Research facility or laboratory { b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) The purpose of this amendment application is for a minor modification. The modification we are requesting is that "Processing and Storage" be an allowed use at Meadowlands Business Complex (MBC). "Processing and Storage" is an allowed use per your regulations in the zone district where MBC is located but it was never requested under our umbrella permit and we are now requesting that it be added. c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain The building is 60,000 Square Feet d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) The building is a single story with mezzanine. 10,000 s.L of mezzanine area. The elevation for the building will be 35 feet. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not Applicable f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 30 office employees + 40 non -office employees = 70 total employees. No more than 20 company vehicles proposed. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Not Applicable 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 348,480 Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing 0 % / 0 sq. ft. Proposed 0 % / 0 sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 % / 0 sq. ft. Proposed 0 % / 0 sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 0 % / 0 sq. ft. Proposed 0 % / 0 sq. it. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 2 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (Including interior renovations): $ 0 b) Landscaping: $ 0 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) n/a 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) 389 VTE b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) 53 VTE c) P.M. peak hour for entire property (in and out) 55 VTE 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday throup-h Friday 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE Fall/Winter 2009 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowners. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) The owners of record are provided on a separate attached sheet. 3 l 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE G ( 3 ) A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. B4ye-Sj regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit e" , e-vv-, :A o-1 301 o q on 111\ M-u CA 3 S,Z{ C of �`eS I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. OCA 4� URE OF APPLICANT tit S GN TURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION 1(5 REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: 4 Complete Incomp Director of Planning & Zoning 4/� a �(, 16 �', Manning-& Zoning Ll \ LOT TG Esis1-9 \�\/y WWrW Ace Jobt urc 16"twe Rim=JII.00' \ 10119 JW P4-V � _ y 80' ROW Rio=JI/.12' Inv= JJ2. 10' E. 2c'ADS u/mvf 1BN Bonner bar w, n Lot 1 amsoe Earth moobf Carµ contra! D/ack pY/ors. Two of eoM franca (bTyl. �r AY. drK!>Y s Or%Pe . stub �y — — — ve / t / / Tjp/co/ .acre dL rha ) d .: otion t be1 defamigeQ / �" N / 1 �• J 3. wjp ' / i r and If 1 etio r / 7 see _ _Il /-fx. SNH Lot � 1 Mv. M J3/.06 Mv. M JJD BS Es. M9. /2 M r JJQ BI . v=JJ2.1 -�- B'Mv. M=JJ2. !' 501,20' B'M,.. M=JJ202' SM eon+fruetar s ---- B' 1- ouf=JJI %r+t i \ hyN / .01 tmfmous / _CLASS # I I \ 1 1 i 1 `- New tonstrucr;w - I I Rm;/ knchq I s.r 0e/oh I I I Existing Pond I � I I I 1 I I I J I I 1 r3 1 / 11 f f! ! \ /\ lvd 20' rare , I aASS N NEttonds ' / ..Pw -41 1 t71 Reter to Cono/7rond Use DeteimrloUon No. 4• 1 I 20doled ! / 4 �� ,, _ / I! I I I 11-398 h2 r n/armotiarl. ` / additional oddiliond No new disturbance V 1 I r / / �' $ i j t l l J 0 •so ewr d Gri l / � ars sir I of Coss B wellonos or wetland bu//er Proposed. •.} _ o/ 1m. of eanserye/ron. -� r $e. ' r NIA ,[f 1 I ll r \" 9 w.•.`w�. ' ' /I ' / a.1 I 1e ew*lhq 20 / .I1h r i "'e1A1 i/ it PeobsN W CA w I / l� / 1 ♦ c le ` 'I / tom^ ` I FrWlYnuc I l / -IA.MGloss Lot! it 7/ { -. �! Somw ke .bill Freida /) / / / � / 4 ♦ T � � � „ 1'j If IMI, 1 11 ,Il I } i / NX .H7 P.t-7 20' r m- -P �eF � "�� �. /, 11i11 11 111 I � � � I / �. { LOW /� t�� rkr �9 � ! �+sse_: � �I I IIn11 t11j II I I / / \ / 1 1 I it 1 1 I I I 1 / r \� N.► sM rot /; / I 1 11 11 1 1 ,11 1 V / 20: 10 jIf In 1 1111111� 111 A�11 1 I I I 1 l! IIII�1 �I "m+ob .pre ft. s/W. eh.*— Ex. SYH /6 o w ,m rs w Pons See D.I ft RI JIJ 02• Lot00 cow 1 ELr/A loI $51 Peg 1 7 ember 18, 2 r Acreage.• H A coot s 01 qa i P. ca Zon/ and :FI-F j I ti1111. 1 Yho it , l o etamab y xry Fnpwly Ahm shown o s Nam o pf r ot'P / / _�_ _ S j'il/", oiled ihvP ** rd Bwnssa' Pbe - Subdn4bn Pb1' by rr *0 I76i / /G - -• �� ! I Consu.'/tsq Fngh.ws. abrM Aps 2A Im r clrPYd h lb..sn. $6 Poo..l h tM G'fy of South Arrrgton GP.M RecorDR icrapod fended I trg•_q- Storm ter Detention A4w slrucicn .evnrol /wren / 200' Z 9 B 1/ A'm// hq see Drourd_ _ - New -0— .01 Nth see / 655,63' - t.nc. Nonw ! AimAe Lbbo& NX MA 12ff Locotion Mop Owner & AmVicont Nt/ormohon: 09rten ATeodowlonds LLC P.O. ear 2184 South Btrrlrrgfm, VT 05403 Maas.' Told area = 800 acres (344480 sq. ft) Ionia' Movstriol end open Space Zoning District �{ Corarooe A. Frvlh 0 sL of N A fwh/h Porw 1 0. of N A Pnpoxd A, JL oW st U.." JOx P-p-d PPvwnw /~. ~78sr. MIX N A r.lof C-V. 15407e rL I Je7.t BOx F I d c_W. In9x Parking 40, 000 sq It. NhrehouseAtslr/bution/Conlroclor e 1 voce/7, 000 s0l. = 20 spaces 18,750 sµ ft. Office space a 35 spaces/h, 000 sq R. - 66 spaces l0, o00 sq It.. warehouse (m —tonel e1 spoces/Z, 000 sq ft.. = 5 spaces Told Spaces Required = 91 spaces Proposed Perking Spaces = 100 (ihctyr5 harldtcapped) Legend -I - Sur y c tr Point - - � Prgow/y GMe ar Rphl o/ eoy —JJI EwutMq g-ound convoy, S &hdmq sewer monho/e (] Fwbrhq catch 6-S s E b/mq sewer a, w pQ fention hywon/ / wofx w/w -.--.— rWslmq / ce rvww� F alhg hood th. -----3N------ New ra ld grow q . New Nmh.ir. New con/nuour 9AI / CI New conslrucrhn II R NncM9 0' vl 40' do' 110• 160' 20d Bor Sco% I' = e0' 2010 "umpstw enc/osure shifted 10• swh 2009 dumvrfx snc/osure sM 2008 Pd/ors s n 08 split p / .. Un/l I Dols:". srorogs s h 07 r.vised c..d-- pods =, l of UNr 1 entrant. swn 2007 .• r I' condnsr Pods s h 19. 2006 por.in9 Is. Scott t Naberto PeIIBAf�I FbL 2109 P,�16 IW 211 P.21V January 11, 2010 Josie Palmer Leavitt O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. PO Box 2184 1855 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 472 Meadowland Drive Dear Ms. Leavitt: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Administrative Officer on January 11, 2010 (effective 1/11/09). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning and Zoning Assistant Encl. r esffi *0 9011 southburlington PLANNING & ZONING April 8, 2009 Josie Palmer Leavitt O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: New Tenant — Project Graphics, Inc — 472 Meadowland Drive Dear Ms. Leavitt: This is in response to your letter of April 6, 2009 requesting approval under your umbrella permit for a new tenant at 472 Meadowland Drive. The new tenant is Project Graphics, Inc., which is a printing and binding facility. They will occupy 6,548 sq. ft., including the mezzanine. Based on a review of the parking requirements and traffic generation of this and the existing tenants in the building, this new tenant is approved. Sincerely, Paul Conner Director of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com T AND NIAlNAGEMENT April 6, 2009 Paul Conner Director of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Seeking permission for Project Graphics, Inc. (new Tenant) — Meadowlands Unit #5 Dear Mr. Conner: First I want to apologize for this not being done earlier. We were told that this had already been taken care of. The company is Project Graphics, Inc.; they are looking to occupy Unit #5 at our Meadowlands Complex, which is 5,000 square feet.) I have been told that they have 7 � employees; their business is a printing facility. l ���/g 5 _ Should you need anything else from us, please contact me at our office at 658-5000 or by email at josie@obrienbrothersagency.com Sinc ly, e Palmer Leavi t O'Brien Brothers Agency CC: Stephanie O'Brien Ray Belair Greg McKim Andy Rieker SERVING OUR COMMUNITY'S REAL ESTATE NEEDS SINCE 1 9 5 8Pan�;.r 1855 i d Williston Road • PO Box 2184 - South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 802.658 5000 • fax 658.50 ` 02 abrienbrothersagency.co Pagel of 2 ray From: Greg McKim [mckim@projectgraphics.com] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 4:10 PM To: ray; Josie Palmer Leavitt; Paul Conner Cc: Andy Riecker; stephanie@obrienbrothersagency.com; Tonya; Tyler Scott Subject: RE: Allowable Use Information for Project Graphics Ray: Please be advised that the correct category for our business is "printing and binding facilities". If you have any further questions, please let me know. Thanks. Greg Gregory McKim Vice President Project Graphics 80 Pickett District Road New Milford, CT 06776 www.projectgra hics.com phone: 860.355.1260 x302 fax: 866.798.9855 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and attachments, if any, may contain confidential information, which is privileged and protected from disclosure by Federal and State confidentiality laws, rules or regulations. This e-mail and attachments, if any, are intended for the designated addressee only. If you are not the designated addressee, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the e-mail and its attachments, if any, may be unlawful and may subject you to legal consequences. If you have received this e-mail and attachments in error, please contact Project Graphics immediately at 800.655.731land delete the e-mail and its attachments from your computer. Thank you for your attention. From: ray [mailto:rbelair@sburl.com] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 3:31 PM To: Josie Palmer Leavitt; Paul Conner Cc: Greg McKim; Andy Riecker; stephanie@obrienbrothersagency.com Subject: RE: Allowable Use Information for Project Graphics Hi Josie, Thanks for the letter. The use category which this use may fit is "printing and binding facilities". I need more information about the use to determine if it fits within this category. Thanks. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 802-846-4106 4/7/2009 Page 2 of 2 From: Josie Palmer Leavitt[mailto:josie@obrienbrothersagency,com] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 3:02 PM To: Paul Conner; ray Cc: Greg McKim; Andy Riecker; stephanie@obrienbrothersagency.com Subject: Allowable Use Information for Project Graphics Importance: High Dear Paul and Ray Per my conversation with Ray today, you needed a letter regarding Meadowlands Tenant for Unit #5. Please find attached the letter and if you have any questions please let me know. Thanks0 Josie Palmer Leavitt O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. 1855 Williston Road PO Box 2184 South Burlington , Vermont 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 Fax (802) 658-5002 4/7/2009 J Page 1 of 2 ray From: ray Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 10:23 AM To: 'Josie Leavitt' Subject: RE: Scholastic Outside Fixture Hi Josie, This fixture is acceptable. You may install this fixture at your convience. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 802-846-4106 From: Josie Leavitt [maiIto:josie@obrienbrothersagency.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 10:16 AM To: ray Subject: FW: Scholastic Outside Fixture Hi Ray Here is the wall mount light I was thinking about for over the rear door at Scholastics. Can you let me know your thoughts and if it will meet South Burlington's lighting requirements? I am also, working with Act 250 regarding this as well. Thanks0 Josie Palmer Leavitt O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. 1855 Williston Road PO Box 2184 South Burlington , Vermont 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 Fax (802) 658-5002 From: Roxanne Chan - Pratt & Smith, Inc.[mailto:prattandsmith@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 9:40 AM To: Josie Leavitt Subject: Scholastic Outside Fixture Josie, Attached is the specification sheet for the fixture that Dan spoke to you about. You may contact him with any questions. Thanks, C&oxacnne Iftarn Office Administrator 1/12/2009 Page 1 of 1 ray From: Josie Leavitt [ osie@obrienbrothersagency.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 10:16 AM To: ray Subject: FW: Scholastic Outside Fixture Attachments: Ruud GWC.pdf Hi Ray Here is the wall mount light I was thinking about for over the rear door at Scholastics. Can you let me know your thoughts and if it will meet South Burlington's lighting requirements? I am also, working with Act 250 regarding this as well. Thanks0 Josie Palmer Leavitt O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. 1855 Williston Road PO Box 2184 South Burlington , Vermont 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 Fax (802) 658-5002 From: Roxanne Chan - Pratt & Smith, Inc. [mailto:prattandsmith@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 9:40 AM To: Josie Leavitt Subject: Scholastic Outside Fixture Josie, Attached is the specification sheet for the fixture that Dan spoke to you about. You may contact him with any questions. Thanks, dZ9xanne 15cLn Office Administrator PRATT & SMITh , INC, ELECT IeAL CON(RActORs 400� 578 Route 7 South Milton, VT 05468 802.893.1437 Phone 802.893.1438 Fax www.prattandsmith.com 1/12/2009 DIRECT MOUNT 1 " FULL CUTOFF WALL PACK Lens Assembly Rigid die-cast copper -free aluminum and flat glass lens 8.2"(208 mm) # CATALOGSPEC WATTAGE PULSE START METAL HALIDE # 125W PSMH MGWC0612-(a)(b) HSPEC SPEC#<< 15OW PSMH MGWC_0615_(a)(b) _ METAL HALIDE [SPEC # 50W MH MGWC0405-(a)(b) SPEC # 70W MH MGWC0407-(a)(b) 0 SPE.0 # 10OW MH MGWC0410-(a)(b) ❑ SPr_C # 175W MH _ MGWC0417-(a)(b) HIGH PRESSURE _ SODIUM SPEC # 35W HPS MGWC0503-(a)(b) ❑ SPEC # 50W HPS MGWC0505-(a)(b) ❑' SPEC it 70W HPS MGWC0507-(a)(b) ❑ SPEC# ;'10OW HPS MGWC0510-(a)(b) ❑ SPEC # 150W HPS MGWC0515-(a)(b) Specify (a) Voltage & (b) Options. GENERAL DESCRIPTION Full Cutoff Wall Pack fixture for HID lamp, totally enclosed. Housing is seamless copper -free die- cast aluminum. Lens assembly consists of a hinged, rigid die-cast copper -free aluminum frame and clear borosilicate glass lens held securely inside. Lens frame is easily removable and allows for easy attachment and serviceability using top pivoting hinge. Complete silicone gasketing around lens and gasketing at mounting provide a watertight seal. A precision specular aluminum reflector provides forward throw with wide distribution to ensure wide fixture spacings and maximum light levels. Fixture design provides excellent IES Full Cutoff light distribution without glare. The optical chamber is sealed to reduce dirt and insect contamination. Furnished with e-coated, copper -free, lightweight mounting box designed for installation over standard 4-inch square or octagonal and single -gang J boxes and for conduit entry from top, sides and rear. Designed and approved for easy through -wiring. All fixtures use vertical -lamp position. 5 mmj I (86 mm) S mm) `- ' 116, (294Imm) 12.0"(304 mm) - Wiring Compartment Ignitor (Where required) Lampholder Housing Die-cast aluminum Lamp (Included) Reflector Precision aluminum VOLTAGE D 120/277V (Standard: 125W PSMH; 50 -10OW MH; 50W HPS) M 120/208/240/277V (Standard: 150W PSMH;175W MH; 70 -150W HPS) T 120/277/347V (Canada Only) (Standard: 150W PSMH; 70 -175W MH; 70 -15OW HPS) 1 120V (Standard: 35W HPS) 2 277V 27 277V Reactor (150W PSMH Only) 3 208V 4 240V _ 5 480V (175W 1170 -150W HPS) 6 347V (Canada Only) For voltage availability outside the US and Canada, see Bulletin TD-9 or contact your Ruud Lighting authorized International Distributor. ELECTRICAL Fixture includes clear, medium -base lamp. Pulse -rated porcelain enclosed, 4kv-rated screw - shell -type lampholder. Lamp ignitor included where required. Fixtures require a minimum 90*C temperature feed wire. All ballast assemblies are high -power factor and use the following circuit types: Reactor (277V PSMH) 150W PSMH Reactor 120V: 35 -150W HPS HX — High Reactance 50 -10OW MH; 50 -150W HPS CWA — Constant Wattage Autotransformer 125 & 150W PSMH; 175W MH ANSI lamp wattage label supplied, visible during relamping. UL Listed in the US and Canada for wet locations. 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406-3772 USA PHONE (262) 886-1900 Notes i OPTIONS (factory -installed) -(a)F Fusing -(a)P Button Photocell _ O Quartz Standby (includes 100W quartz lamp) (N/A on 277V Reactor) Specify (a) Single Voltage — See Voltage Suffix Key Exclusive Colorfast DeltaGuardTM finish features an E-coat epoxy primer with medium bronze ultra -durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven-year limited warranty. 6,867,959 and Patents Pending. PC-1 Button Photocell (for fixtures set to 120V) PC-2 Button Photocell (for fixtures set to 208, 240, 277V) PC*6 Button Photocell (for fixtures set to 347V) FAX (262)884-3309 0 Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA vww.ruudlightiinng com 08/03/06 RUUD LIGHTING 150. Candlepower Distribution Curve of 175W MH 12" AeroDome Full Cutoff Wall Pack. 60 45 30 15 0' 1 M a itmumuaimie plots snow imuai tootcanmes at grade. (Footcandles _ 0.0929 = Lux) 1' 18.3 13.7 9.1 4.6 0M 18.3 13.7 9.1 4.6 0 m 4.6 9.1 13.7 18.3 Isofootcandle plot of one 175W MH 12" AeroDome Full Cutoff Wall Pack at 15' (4.6 m) mounting height (plan view). RUUD© 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406-3772 USA LIGHTING © Ruud Lighting, Inc. Printed in USA PHONE (262) 886-1900 FAX (262) 884-3309 www.ruudlighting.com 08/03/06 rr ,®V-1, IN south urinto PLANNING & ZONING October 16, 2008 Josie Palmer Leavitt O'Brien Brothers PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: Site Plan Application #SP-08-99, 472 Meadowland Drive Dear Ms. Leavitt: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer on October 16, 2008 (effective October 16, 2008). Please note the conditions of a roval includin that a zonin ermit must be obtained withi six (6) months If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy Mc onough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com City of South Burlington Application for Site Plan Review a Permit Number SP-- Applicant and Owner: O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC PO Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 (phone) (802) 658-5002 (fax) Location of last recorded deed (book and pq): Book 758 Pg 461 Contact Person: Josie Palmer Leavitt h 011106' 4F.In, 1855 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05407-2184 (802) 658-5000 (802) 658-5002 Email: iosie �obrienbrothersagency.com Proiect Street Address: 472 Meadowland Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Tax Parcel ID NO. 1705-00107 Parcel Size 348,480 sq ft Project Description: General Project Description: To add ten concrete block pillars in front of the building at each entrance area. There are five triangular jet outs on the building and these pillars will be placed underneath these in the mulched landscaped area. The reason for this addition is to comply with the Meadowlands Business Park Association guidelines of having a masonry component on or around the building. Please see attached sketch of pillars. Existing Uses on Property: The existing use is consistent with the original approval for the property including up to 18,750 sq ft for general office and 41,250 sq ft for other approved activities including: Contractor or Building trade facility, light manufacturing, manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials and components, printing and binding production facilities, research facility or laboratory Proposed uses of Property: The purpose of this amendment application is for one minor modification. To add 10 3'-2" x 20" x 20" Column Pillars; Height is 3'-2"+/-; Blue Stone Cap 2' x 2' and 2" high; All going in front of the building, in the mulched landscape area of each entrance way. Total Building Square Footage 50, 000 square feet Height of building & number of floors The building is a single story with mezzanine. 10,000 square feet of mezzanine area is proposed. The elevation for the building will be 35 feet. Number of Residential Units Non Applicable Number of employees & company vehicles 30 office employees + 40 non -office employees = 70 total employees. No more than 20 company vehicles proposed Other Non Applicable LOT COVERAGE: Total Parcel Size: 348, 480 sq ft Building: Existing 14.3% / 50,000 sq ft Proposed: 0 % / 0 sq ft Total sq ft of other impervious surfaces on site (i.e. driveways, patios, decks) Existing 38.5%/ 133,808sq ft Proposed 0 % / 0 sq ft Front yard (along each street) Existing: 0% / 0 sq ft Proposed: 0 / 0 sq ft Total area to be disturbed during construction: Less than 100 sq ft Estimated total cost of the improvements: Attach sketch plan or site plan Building (including interior renovations): $0 Landscaping: $8,750.00 Other site improvements (please list with cost): $0 Estimated Traffic: Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): 389 VTE AM Peak Hour for entire property (in and out): 53 VTE PM Peak Hour for entire property (in and out): 53 WE Peak Hours of Operation: 8 AM -5 PM Peak Days of Operation: Monday — Friday Estimated Project Completion Date: Fall 2008 ABUTTERS: Please see attached list Site Plan Application 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 4 Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application and is accurate to the best of my kpowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT n OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line has been submitted 0 ,6, le- PRINT NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: Iv REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: DI Complete ❑ Incomplete of Planning & Zoning or Designee r a9 ' coNn�1K. t s`Crf,JE (��Vve Ae r: hp dd.t . `� 1 \ Seem V6 Ice ✓aint E SMH J! eJ I' lb Lot 7 _ Er_ SMH A'C 0, VmtuP. "Ne'n=33B 49' R =Jes. 00' / m JJ106 Vol Je7 P. 4J9 "�' JJO. BS Ex. SNN /7 �- —� C � Inv. a✓f JJO.B) Rim=J39. 15' ��s� E. 5.1 f4 B" Inv. inaJ32 J' 532. )0' R—J-2' '�°' ---�-- B"Inv in-JJ2.X Inv a)• RBW m " ffeeabed emsbvethxr s —��� 8" /n v our-JJ/ 96' = - — 9u,yMrA- 9tge avr Drives -p9-- 40V 40 e Meadowlo Ex^isrir9' :' syrr _ _- ----Y sling - -- -- c z< ,,as 4oA -moo. - 237 43" "'Cefrvr A—f edr m h,di t h 4A.;5 ry -__JL-`� rr r r `1'' New emawar. `` O.w � J44P6 "••,.,,� \ t 'E ry�.e e$�N .\ tr.. \\ � „_ - aeefa se• ! x ✓ f j a✓r rtercx 'r I - = - 4sg f -�1 340 Lot / , 11 / � un,/ 7 a�y/�t 1 xww c•,frncr�,( d' ri 1 /]ru'e I Munson Eorrh Moving Corp. / \�'\ 3 R � 4' x 4'iood fe- aoa t � r • r/ _ � — 4f'I I rbrv'r9� c r .tW endr r)he_ Fnd .Srs M[a[e f f� � Existing Pond otensn m ++ nu f a /'; f I 1 I Location Mao p, ,eF11i1 rl//%, 5 \ —6 el�./ j� r 1 \);r%t; G 1 0. `YI / X !fOwner Applicant eeInformation: P. a. ss. .beetWe� l / •! 111 I I ! t / / k4"" / •' - 96n ,y= / .%: '` l ��� ire >t l J I o B Meoa'oWend� LLC t t J/ �3 / ' i • a.9 ` Box 2/84 •, , f / S ! / // / ? /ham eF � ^' f • / / 1� I South BuimI? gton. 25I03 .....,`` , , � ,I I! l /! l / f U� r �tfD eeA � •'`/ /f / y! %/ /��rt�' / I Areas: rota area 9010 ocres (J48•460 .sq H.) l /3 / (416' B 'by 73B-J PJ / 111 i rhrx /mchq 5acoo sq. t ' ! \ ll \lr/ ,� Zoning. '""`' s�l / l •=/ c9,/r„t'^: /� Prr"0p,20 MduBtid and Closer SPoce zw,rng D/sricr t�•I�t�/ / 'i 1 1 J /� r i o o tat Covrrooe r\�Il l / r F r/shed F)oa / I /i cam. Vo h w�•rr. wets. A— r Alas Afn..d osed c Crete l / �I \, CLASS // Wetlands \ I /IK „ 34.3C5 J�,Q r�y.r.¢s• / / Vi'�`,i, a �� I r%/ rN Reler to Card bond Pown�rt e K ar N/A oP7 ,}" _ J �' 8$ ya y! // I 1 - Use Determ n tim No. (tip). ,1 / ? / �l Yi` 2001-/� l d ed pe .nn r m�c�ias oar / �'�� 1 / f/1.. I ;fi m ` oddativ, 'ti—I mroernrerar cb /_%O;W.t JS" .sae x• asrit j}� r / r/ \ 1 %l ,•f No nee dsrrrbonce \ l l C i' ^T g) t •5O' •• arm I /,i oorad— wenon/d axis nr„twd ar—w+ save raolhrr ran6�d�. �d ! / !� J .i''� i '%/ / .1 stole nf. I 4 /j/.1 Mctaased Poririn9 �.�, or r ednr.. omfes�oe�n. t •Z I / X t• ! 1 � � pew = ,.�'�•/ IO, ppp sy./t WorMau �istioutrm/Conrrocfw � 1 space/?, 000 sq!r. 10 spaces ces sro Retamv 7Q 750 s7 ft. O/fice space • 3.5 spoces/1. 000 sq. rt. - 66 spaces 70, 000 ) • spocrs/2.000 M. H. = 5 spaces \\ p hwn °6�•1 t Total d es R wed (97 zz aces 1 s PrgoosedcPonYr q Spaces = 7oo (incl./5 handicapped) �� ,\ \ �I l4 i/ ;� g 9 e ; 3 q) • li/''7''_� "\\\\ 1 %, Lot J Legend 1 ) �, I 1 1 r !• l i Summer Ia ✓oint Vnture e / 4J9 P 1I1---J®III 1 I1tyf/ rI - _Ee.R raifoff•hhr7 �rrn9L �redn_eP. aom_R hntr 6d«re . ore E Hato I I n .,fr�9 rorn II+'�li' Y E.vrnq :e..-lne Al - 11� I ,1 i I I �{� - - - - - II11I 111�p4 fr�hno r/..rs we { , ` �L , Exiflnq fsace Notes. K yd� �� � ��� � � � 1 1 A. a nor o ewresr f n Prrosry Jn.. ftio.n of nor o r✓m ----- ----- rot. rF,ifnned 9�e. ��� i� oe' /// r I e,aaw 'voanrme arr,.ff - sed✓ao, rear' er awdr (Y, '��,�:x-ii�7 9e hat,' �. ft 81 a rro, LLmd rwme Jac e . n.. rwmho.. am o s • a t--> H co,rn.,af.wr m,�, } �/ ///h\\ \\\ �� •W -� i/ u eta 9 s i� ropod —ari a aw �777� \� w 5•-I' x\�'-9' Stormw�ter -i � // I %�� %Ill ����== _-_1� --- Defenbavr and y�x ' , f,: 0' 20' Ia' BO' 120• J60, 2C0' - \,,,,`R.L a/a .or rtrr.•f `""°'" dat��ra a. N wo I" - 40' y 'i i __ vvvvvvvwvl Lot 2 � + x7i -11I\i \ 1\111 II 1 MUrtS EO/th I M • 1 I 1 — � � ooro6e. r 2ooe Palm f.h 70/7778 g Scott h Roberto PeminOw Vol. 209 P. J26 1I jj�� ill ll ll + MO n9 COrfJ,,: j 1� _ _zags �hr �t rwro.. un;r r oerfW. froru9. en 4 4yB 1111 1 11 I 1 r , �'r Ja 200r ww mneenf•� Pees Po..n.,r ar u rr r •nuon�, i.n .� syr Yb/u a bent IB 92MJ - 2:tZy� rz9aa2 cmes+fr Peet _� sib � %/�/I Acreage: H40 '' I S9.09 - �•- -� Aid�nJzaa6 hews n on ff �sf�n ff� �i//fir/ Nee rhOY: a`r 1:_ _ / ..•.�... Yar zs I006 .ssw0 c✓rG. frmf e'F fC9f ifw1 .!/3a 4 !�? o rt.+c• sww baron 655.63 f\` d ando� Zon/n�_ • Design f/A✓ _ e d emjeri Am dleckM Oats ern Drawn FMP NN Site Plan '• �. Homer & Marie Dubois Lheckeo Meadow/ands Business Complex _=. Vol. 179 P. 126 Scale I� " a.°f ft Rm=J 3�'� pate x Lot 2 Meadowland Industrial Park Larry Crnette Project 05146 472 Mdodow/ond Dive South Budngron, V—wt Breincrd Vol. 211 P2e2 A.WffS d' L4,YS/NG Consuif ng d'ngineers, Inc. - -• ' 164 ,Vain Scree{ Co[cAester, Fermont 054#6 AGENCY OF NATUR( RESOURCES (ANR) AND NATURAL 'ESOURCES BOARD http://www.anr.staLe.vt.us/dec/ead/pa/index.htm / http://wv..:.nrb.state.vt.us/ PROJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS IS NOT A PERMIT TOTAL # OF DEC PERMITS: PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW: RESPONSE DATE: PENDING APPLICATION #: DISTRICT: TOWN: South Burlington PIN: EJ96-0381.02 OWNER OF PROJECT SITE: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE: (Name) (Name) O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc / Josie Palmer Leavitt (Address) (Address) 1855 Williston Rd., PO Box 2184 (Town) (State) (Zip) (Town) (State) (Zip) South Burlington Vt., 05407-2184 (Telephone) (Telephone 802-658-5000 Project Name: Lot 2 Based on a written or oral request or information provided by Josie Palmer Leavitt, received on 9-25-08, a project was reviewed on a tract/tracts of land of <10 acres, located on Lot 2 of Meadowlands Industrial Park. The project is generally described as: The addition of a 10000 sf mezzanine to an existing 50000 sf building (total sf = 60000) and the addition of 10 parking spaces to the existing 90 spaces through re -striping rather than addition of payment (total parking spaces = 100). The employee number remains unchanged at 70 employees and a follow-up traffic analysis shows no adverse impact. Prior permits from this office: 4C1005-5, WW-4-2638, EC-4-2004 PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ® I hereby request a jurisdictional opinion from the District Coordi r nt District Coordinator regarding the jurisdiction of 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250) over the project described above. ❑ n r/Agent ® Permit Specialist ❑ Other Person 1. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION, AND A WRITTEN REQUEST FROM THE ANR PERMIT SPECIALIST, THE LAN DOWNER/AGENT, OR OTHER PERSON. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY REQUEST RECONSIDERATION FROM THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR (10 V.S.A. § 6007 (c) AND ACT 250 RULE 3 (C)) OR MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V. S.A. Chapter 220). (#47) ** Project:,Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Municipal Has the landowner subdivided before? ❑ Yes ❑ No When/where: # of lots: AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED: ❑ Yes IKKo Copies sent to Statutory Parties: ❑ Yes �o- BASIS FOR DECISION: SIGNATURE: DATE: vo 2 16S ADDRESS: District # ` 1 Environmental Commission District Coordinator Tel phone: V WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRED? ❑ Yes ® No ® Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit (#1 & U** ❑ Notice of Permit Requirements (deferral language ) (#2) ❑ Floor Drains (#1.2) El Campgrounds (#J3 ❑Extension of sewer lines (U5 REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: SIGNATURE: JrA DATE: 10-1-08 ADDRESS: Dept. of Environmental Conservation ® Environmental s to ce Office, Permit Specialist Jeff McMahon Telephone: 802-879-5676 ❑ Wastewater Mana ement Division, Telephone: 802-879-5656 OVER »»»»»»» **NOTE: NUMBERS /N PARENTHESES (#) REFER TO PERMIT INFORMATION SHEETS IN THE VERMONT PERMIT HANDBOOK http://www.anr.state.W.us/dec/permit hb/index.htm THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON -BINS( DETERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PR ITS WHICH YOU MAY NEED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CC7..STRUCTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPAK i MENTS INDICATED BELOW. 3. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3822) Contact: ❑ Discharge Permits: pretreatment; industrial, municipal (#7_1, 7_2, & 8) ❑ Indirect Discharge Permits (#9 & 9_1) ❑ Residuals Management #10) 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (888-520-4879) Contact: ❑ Construction/modification of source (#14) ❑ Open Burning (#18) ❑ Wood Chip Burners (>90 HP) #14) ❑ Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation #14) ❑ Industrial Process Air Emissions (#14) ❑ Diesel Engines (>450 bHP) #14) 5. WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) (800-823-6500 in VT) Contact: ❑ New Hydrants #22) ❑ >500' waterline construction #22) ❑ Community Water System (CWS) ❑ Bottled Water #20) ❑ Operating permit #21) ❑ Transient Non -Community water system (TNC) #21) ❑ Capacity Review for Non -transient non -community water systems (NTNC) #21) 6. WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR STORMWATER PERMITS L —6_5 ) Contact: Contact: ❑ Flood Plains (241-3759) ❑ Ponds (#32.1) ❑ Construction General Permits >1AC of disturbance (#6.1) ❑ Shoreland Encroachment (241-3777) Steve Hanna t#28) ❑ Stormwater from new development or redevelopment sites #( 6.2 & 6_3) El Wetlands (241-3770) (#29) ❑ Multi -Sector General Permit (MSGP) industrial activities w/ SIC codes #O 6.4) ❑ Stream Alteration / Section 401 Water Quality Certification / Stream Crossing Structures (476-2679 / 879-5631 / 786-5906) (#27 & 32) 7QWASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: Dennis Fekert 241-1493 Hazardous Waste Handler site ID (241-3888) #36) ❑ Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888) June Reilly #33) ❑ Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities drop off (241-3444) #37,39,40) ❑ Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) ® Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) #41 & 44) ❑ Composting Facilities (241-3444) #43) ❑ Waste oil burning (241-3888) ❑ Waste transporter permit #35) ❑ Demolition waste 241-3477 ❑ Used septic system components/stone (#41) 8. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR Contact: _ ❑ Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.) (241-3451) 445) ❑ State -funded municipal water/sewer extensions/upgrades and Pollution Control Systems (241-3750) 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION & MERCURY DISPOSAL HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) #46) Contact: SMALL BUSINESS & MUNICIPAL COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE (1-800-974-9559) Contact: RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) Contact: Judy Mirro/John Daly 10. FISH & WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT (802-241-3700) Contact : ❑ Nongame & Natural Heritage Program (Threatened & Endangered Species) #47.4) ❑ Stream Obstruction Approval #47.5) 11. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (802-479-7561) or District Office 879-2300 Contact: ❑ Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, accessibility (Americans with Disabilities Act) #49, 50, 50.1, 50.2) ❑ Storage of flammable liquids, explosives ❑ LP Gas Storage //❑,,Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers #50.2) El Boilers and pressure vessels #50.3) �1.Y. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800439-8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: Vern Nelson ❑ Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors (#51, 51.1, 52, 53, 53.1) ® Program for asbestos control & lead certification #54, 55, 55.1) ❑ Children's camps ❑Hot Tub Installation & Inspection — Commercial #51.1) 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: ❑ Child care facilities (1-800-649-2642 or 802-241-2159) #57) ❑ Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities) #59) ❑ Nursing Homes (241-2345) (#59) ❑ Assisted Living and Therapeutic Community Residences (241-2345) #59) 14. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Contact: ❑ Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) #66) ❑ Junkyards (828-2053) #62) ❑ Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) #63) ❑ Railroad crossings (828-2710) #64) ❑ Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) #61) ❑ Airports and landing strips (828-2833) #65) ❑ Construction within state highway right-of-way (Utilities, Grading, etc.) (828-2653) (#66) ❑ Motor vehicle dealer license (828-2067) (#68) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (800-675-9873 OR 802-828-3429) Contact: ❑ Use/sale of Pesticides (828-3429) (#72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78) ❑ Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-3429) #81) ❑ Milk Processing Facilities (828-3429) (#83, 83.1, 85, 87) ❑ Animal shelters/pet merchant/livestock dealers (828-3429) (#89, 89.1) ❑ Golf Courses (828-2431) (#71) Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431)(#79) ❑ Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) ##888) ❑ Medium and Large Farm Operations (828-2431) ❑ Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Frozen Dessert/Class "C" Pesticides (828-3429) (#75.1, 80, 16. VERMONT ENERGY CODE ASSSISTANCE CENTER TOLL FREE 888-373-2255 ❑ VT Building Energy Standards (#47.2) 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3211) ❑ Historic Buildings (#47.1 & 101) ❑ Archeological Sites (#47.1 & 101) 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) ❑ Liquor Licenses (#90) ❑ General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2386) ❑ Business Registration #( 90.1) p Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) (#90.2) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551 & 828-5787) ❑ Income & business taxes (sales, meals/ rooms, etc) (#91, 92, 23, 94, 95, 96) DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2070) ❑ Fuel Taxes; Commercial Vehicle (#69-70) LOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 23. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 8 Carmichael St., Ste. 205, Essex Jct., VT 05452 (802) 872-2893 (#97, 98, & 99) 24. OTHER: Sections #3424 above have been completed by Permit Specialist Jeff McMahon Date: 10-1-08 1 may be reached at 802-879- 5676 Copies have been mailed to: Revised 6/06 ( Page 1 of 1 McMahon, Jeff From: Krebs & Lansing [klengineers@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 11:11 AM To: McMahon, Jeff Cc: 'Robert H. Rushford'; 'Stephanie O'Brien'; 'Josie Leavitt' Subject: Lot 2 Meadowland Industrial Park Hi Jeff, As we discussed on the phone, the purpose of this correspondence is to clarify the permit status of Lot 2 at the Meadowland Industrial Park in South Burlington. This project obtained all necessary permits and was constructed in 2006-2007. Upon completion, several possible tenants expressed interest in more space. Therefore mezzanine space was added to the units. A permit from the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department was obtained for this purpose. To accommodate the expected increase in parking with the new space, several parallel spots were changed to "head in" parking. No other site work or improvements were necessary. No increase in employees has been proposed. We are now in the process of confirming that an amendment to the Act 205 permit for the project is not necessary. In regards other State permits: - No additional permitting from the Wastewater Management Division is necessary because there is no increase in employees. - No additional permitting from the Water Quality Division is necessary because there is no increase in impervious surface proposed and no proposed ground disturbance. Our client is requesting a revised, "clean", project review sheet to aid in future real estate transactions. Please contact us if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance. Scott W. Homsted, P.E. Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 802-878-0375 / 802-878-9618 fax klengineers@comcast.net AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES (ANR) AND NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD http://www.anr.state.vt.us/declead/palindex.htm / http://www.nrb.state.vt.us/ PROJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS IS NOT A PERMIT -OTAL # DEC PERMITS _ RESPONSE DATE )ISTRICT 4 OWNER OF PROJECT SITE: NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: MUNICIPALITY South Burlington project Name: Meadowlands Industrial Park PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW PENDING APPLICATION #_ PIN # APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE: NAME: O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. c/o Josie Palmer Leavitt ADDRESS: 1855 Williston Road, P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407-2184 TELEPHONE: 8021658-5000; (fax) 658-5002 3ased on a written or oral request from or information provided by Josie Palmer Leavitt received on July 31, Sept 19, and Sept 25, 2008 a project was reviewed on a tract/tracts of land of <10 acres, located on Lot #2 of Meadowlands Industrial Park The project is generally described as: The addition of a 10,000 s.f. -mezzanine to an existing 50,000 s.f. building (Total s.f. = 60,090) and the addition of 10 parking spaces to the existing 90 spaces through re -striping rather than addition of pavement (Total parking spaces = 100). The employee number remains unchanged at 70 employees and a follow-up traffic analysis shows no adverse impact (see Sept 19, 2008 Traffic Update by Jody Carriere, P.E.). Prior Permits From This Office: .-Xsw 66-g-1qMg PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION t ] I hereby request a jurisdictional opinion from the District Coordinator or Assistant District Coordinator regarding thejurisdiction of 10 V.S.A.. Chapter 151 (Act 250) over the project described above. ----------------------------------------- ❑ Landowner/Agent, ❑ ANR Permit Specialist, ❑ Other Person 1. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION, AND A WRITTEN REQUEST FROM THE ANR PERMIT SPECIALIST, THE LANDOWNER/AGENT, OR OTHER PERSON. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY REQUEST RECONSIDERATION FROM THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR (10 V.S.A. § 6007 (c) AND ACT 250 RULE 3 (C)) OR MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V.S.A. Chapter 220). (#47)'" Project: ® Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Municipal project Has the landowner subdivided before? AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED: ❑ YES ® NO BASIS FOR DECISION: # of lots: Copies sent to Statutory Parties: ❑ YES ® NO ❑ When/where: The proposed project does not constitute a material change to the existing development under Act 250 Rule 2(c)(6). SIGNATURE: 7 �- -.R ,� �,,.� DATE: �i� ADDRESS: Environmental Commissions Districts #4, 6, & 9 Stephanie H. Monaghan, District Coordin or Telephone: (8�662 111 West Street, Essex Junction, VT 05452 ``J WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICIA.,: PERMITS • "' "-..QUIRED 1/ YES NO Wastewater System & Potable Water Supply Permit (#1 & #2) El Notice of Pei..,,. ,..,.,,..���� 11L� (deferral language) (#2) ❑ Floor Drains (#1 & #2) ❑ Campgrounds (#3) ❑ Extension of sewer lines (#5) SS REGIONAL EN INEER ASSIGNED: 1 ��� ((� , �t�e.S qrQ iPA� c .� �� 110 t�l'�'Y"s�g�.� e-r wr�� cuL � ts>v`S�c�n� SIGNATURE: DATE: 9` X '0 K ADDRESS: Dept. of Environmental Conservation Environmental s t ce Division, Permit Specialist Jeff McMahon Telephone: (802)879-5676 ❑ Wastewater Management Division Telephone: (802)879-5656 OVER»»»»»» ** NOTE: NUMBERS IN PARENTHESIS (#) REFER TO PERMIT INFORMATION SHEETS IN THE VERMONT PERMIT HANDBOOK http://www.anr.state.vt.us/dec/permit hb/index.htm THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON -BINDING DETERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PERMITS WHICH YOU MAY NEED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENTS INDICATED BELOW. 3. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3822) Contact: ❑ Discharge permit; pretreatment; industrial, municipal (#7.1, 7.2. & ) ❑ Underground Injection Control (UIC;)(#9 & #9.1) ❑ Residuals management (#10 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (888 520-4879) Contact: ❑ Construction/modification of source (#14) ❑ Open Burning (#18) ❑ Woo ip urners > 4) ❑ Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation (#14) ❑ Industrial Process AAir Emissions (#14) ElDiesel Engines L 20 bHP) (A 4) 5. WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400)(800 823-6500 in VT) Contact: ❑ New Hyydrants (#22) ❑>500' of waterline construction(#22) ❑ Community Water System ❑ Bottled Water ❑ pera ing permit (#21) ❑ Transient Non -Community Water System (TNC) (#21) ❑ Capacity Review for Non -transient non -community water system (NTNC) ( G)2WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR Stormwater Permits (110tkne-8e2=441.49— -(#9- A )i p� .y� ontact: Contact: ) Wtr Ke. p -1 1• S4j' ❑ Floodplains - ❑ Ponds ❑ Construction eneral Permit >1 AC of disturbance (#6.1) ❑ Shoreland Encroachment 241-37 7) Steve Hanna (#28) )RC,Stormwater from new developpmen or redevelopmentsues (6.2 & 6.3) ❑ Wetlands (241-3770) (#29) ❑ Multi -Sector General Permit (OP) industrial activities with SIC codes (#6.4) ❑ Stream Alteration/ Section 401 Water Quality Certificate / Stream Crossing structures (751-0129/879-5631/786-5906) (27 & ##32) 0. WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: n1S Fe-"5111?-'�Lqlf- )tt/3 ❑ Hazardous Waste Handler site ID(241-3888) #36) Ei Undergroundtorage an s - ) ❑ Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling faci ities, drop off (241-3444_) (#37, #39, #40) ElAsbestos Disposal 241-3444 K Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444 #41 & #44) ❑ Compostingg Facilities (241-3444) (#43 ❑ Waste oil burnin (241-3888) El Waste Transporter permit (#35) ❑ Demolition Waste 241-3477 ❑ Used septic system components/stone F#41) FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR Contact: Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.)(241-3451) (#45) State funded municipal water/sewer extensions/upgrades and Pollution Control Systems (241-3750) 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION & MERCURY DISPOSAL HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) #46) Contact: SMALL BUSINESS AND MUNICIPAL COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE (1-800-974-9559) Contact: Judy irro/ o n Daly RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) Contact: 10. DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE, ANR (802-241-3700) Contact: ❑ Nongame & Natural Heritage Program (Threatened & Endangered Species)(#47.4) ❑ Stream Obstruction Approval 9 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (802-479-7561) or District Office Contact: Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, accessibility (Americans with Disabilities Act)0.1. #50.2) ❑ Storage of flammable liquids, explosives ❑ LP as Storage ❑ Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers (#50.2) ❑ Boilers and pressure vessels (#50.3) 12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: ❑ Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors (#51, #51.1, #52, #53, #53.1) ❑ Program for asbestos control & lead ce i ica ion , #55.1) ❑ Children's camps ❑ Hot Tub Installation & Inspection - Commercial (#51.1) 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: ❑ Child care facilities (800 649-2642 or 802-241-2159)(#57) ❑ Residential care homes - ept. o Aging isa i ities o Nursing Homes (241-2345) (#59) ❑ Therapeutic Community esidence 24 2345) #59) (14i AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Contact: 'rr�J Access to state highways (residential commercial) (828-2653) (#66) ElJunkyards ❑ Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) (#63) ❑ Railroad crossings (82 -2710 (164 Z ❑ Development within 500' of a limited access hi hway (828-2653) (#61) ❑ Airports and landing strips (8�8-283) (#65) 'Construction within state highway right -of way Utilities, Grading, etc.) (828-2653) (#66) ❑Motor vehicle dealer license (828- - 2067) (#68) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (800-675-9873 OR 800-828-3429) Contact: Li Use/sale of pesticides (828-2431) (#72 #73, #74, #75, #76, #77, #78) ❑ Slaughter houses, poultry processing - (#81) Ei Milk processing facilities (828-24 3) (8� , #83.1, #85, #87) ❑ Animal shelters/pet merchant/livestock dealers (828-242 ) (#8 , #861) ❑ Golf courses (828-2431) (#71) ❑ Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431) (#79) ❑ Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) (#88) ❑ Medium and Large Farm Operations (828-2431) ❑ Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Frozen Dessert/Class "C" Pesticides (828-2436) ((#75.1, #80 16. VERM NT ENERGY CODE ASSISTANCE CENTER TOLL FREE 888-373-2255 ❑ VT Building Energy Standards (#47.2) 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3211) ❑ Historic Buildings (#47.1 & #101) ❑ Archeological sites (#47.1 8, #101) 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) ❑ Liquor licenses (#90) ❑ General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2386) ❑ Business registration (#90.1) ❑ Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) (#90.2) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551 & 828-5787) ❑ Income & business taxes (sales, meals/rooms, etc) (#91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96) drDEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2074) F_1 Fuel taxes; commercial vehicle(#69 - #70) >LOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 23. FEDERAL PERMITS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 8 Carmichael Street, Ste. 205, Essex Jct, VT 05452 (802)872-2893 (97, #98, & #99) 24. OTHERR: Sections #3424 above have been completed by Permit Specialist: Jeff McMahon Date: '04 WY.l may be reached at 802-879-5676 Copies have been mailed to: ____ _____ __.__ RI'VISED 6/06 DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT September 24, 2008 Ms. Stephanie H. Monaghan District Coordinator District #4 Environmental Commission 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 RE: Meadowlands Case Number: 4C1005-5 Parking Spaces Employee Number has not changed Dear Ms. Monaghan: I am writing to you today based on our email correspondence, regarding the change at Meadowlands. You asked that we certify to you that the amount of employees was not impacted by the change with the additional mezzanine space and you wanted an updated traffic study. As a refresher, what happened to the parking was we made the parallel parking spots in the back into perpendicular parking spots, we did not add any surface area, and we just redid line stripping. Again, no surface area was added or taken away; no construction was done to the exterior of this property. All our permits remain the same regarding the amount of employees that are allowed at Meadowlands, and that number is still 70 employees. We would like to make sure that we are all set with Act 250 regarding this. We would like to request at this time from you a project review sheet for our records. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter. Thank you for your time and advice in this matter. I greatly appreciate it. rrly, almer Leavitt Executive Coordinator O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. (802)658-5000 0osie ,obrienbrothersagency.com Cc: Stephanie O'Brien 121 SERVING OUR COMMUNITY'S REAL ESTATE NEEDS SINCE 1958 OPPORTUNITY 1855 Williston Road e PO Box 2184 • South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 - 802.658.5000 • fax 658.5002 obrienbrothersagency.com 11 DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT July 29, 2008 Y Stephanie H. MonaghanI ) �C �~ District Coordinator i�,� a District #4 Environmental Commission SUl 3 ` 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 4, E r1% RE: Meadowlands Case Number: 4C1005-5 Parking Spaces Dear Ms. Stephanie Monaghan: I am writing to you today based on our conversation on the phone today, regarding the change at Meadowlands. The Land Use Permit 4C1005-5, stated we had 90 parking spots, based on the construction of a 50,000 sq ft industrial/commercial building. I found out recently that we got approval from the City of South Burlington (SD-06-88) to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 50,000 sq ft building, to add 10,000 sq ft of mezzanine space, for a total of 60,000 sq ft of gross floor area, inside the building, by doing this it allowed us to add 10 more parking spots in the rear, for a total of 100 spots for the entire building. What happened to the parking was we made the parallel parking spots in the back into perpendicular parking spots, we did not add any surface area, and we just redid line stripping. Again, no surface area was added or taken away; no construction was done to exterior of this property. We would like to make sure that we are all set with Act 250 regarding this. Based on our conversation today, it looks like an amendment would not be needed but we would need to request at this time from you a project review sheet for our records. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter. Thank you for your time and advice in this matter. I greatly appreciate it. 4S' erely, sie Palmer Leavitt Executive Coordinator O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. (802)658-5000 iosie(a-)obrienbrothersagencV.com Cc: Stephanie O'Brien SERVING OUR C 0 M M U N I T Y ' S REAL ESTATE NEEDS SINCE 1 958 oPPORrN,I � 1855 Williston Road PO Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2184 • 802.658.5000 e fax 658.5002 obrienbrothersagency.com 14 Morse Drive issex Junction, VT 05452 September 19, 2008 ULamoureux & Dickinson ,E Consulting Engineers, Inc. Scott Homsted, P.E. Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 RE: Meadowland Park Lot #2 - Traffic Impact Study Update Dear Scott, Tel (802) 878-4450 Fax (802) 878-3135 Etnail: mailCLDengineering.com As requested, we have updated the traffic impact study for Lot #2 in the Meadowland Business Park. The original study was prepared for a 10,000 s.f. general office building and a 40,000 s.f. warehouse building. Due to the addition of a mezzanine space, the square footage actually constructed results in 18,750 s.f. of general office space and a 41,250 s.f. of warehouse space. The following study evaluates the impact of the traffic generated by the additional square footage. To meet the Act 250 permit condition for Meadowland Business Park, this traffic study estimates the amount of traffic this Project will generate, analyzes the impact that traffic will have on the Hinesburg Road (VT Route 116) / Meadowland Drive intersection and identifies whether any improvements are needed at this intersection. These calculations and analyses are presented in the following sections. Project -Generated Trips The trip generation of the additional square footage of the mezzanine area of the building on Lot #2 was estimated using trip generation data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) for the general office building and general light industrial land -use categories. The following table shows the resulting weel(day vehicular trip ends (vte) previously permitted for the project and the estimate for the square footage that was constructed. A.M. Peak Hour vte/hour P.M. Peal(Hour vte/hour Previously Permitted Project Trips Based 53 55 on Originally Planned Square Footage Proposed Total Amount of Project Trips 67 68 Based on Constructed Square Footage Additional Trips Generated by 14 13 Additional Square Footage Civil Environmental Transportation Planning Landscape Architecture Land Surveying %q lI Meadowland Park Lot #2 September 19, 2008 Page 2 All additional project trips will access the project site from the Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Drive intersection. The directional patterns of the new project trips were based on existing patterns of traffic observed during counts conducted by this office at the Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Drive intersection on June 24, 2008. The resulting distribution of project trips is shown in Figure 1. Background Traffic Volumes Background traffic data for the Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Drive intersection was obtained from traffic counts performed by both the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) and this office. Average daily traffic volume data for Hinesburg Road (VT Route 1 16) was obtained from an automatic traffic recorder (ATR) count performed by VTrans at Station D-124 located approximately 0.2 miles north of Meadowland Drive. This count provided 2006 average daily volumes, which were then projected to 2009 volumes using growth rate factors published by VTrans. A peak hour turning movement count (TMC) was performed by this office on June 24, 2008 at the Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Drive intersection. This count was performed during both the morning and afternoon peak hour periods. Accepted engineering practice is to analyze future traffic conditions using what is called the design hour volume or DHV. The DHV is defined as the 30"' highest hour of traffic volumes occurring on an annual basis. The average daily volumes and turning movement counts referenced above were used to calculate the 2009 DHV. Additional trips were then added to background traffic to account for lots within Meadowland Business Park that are fully permitted, but were not fully occupied at the time of the turning movement count. This included an allowance for 67% of the permitted trips on Lot 1 A, 50% of the permitted trips on Lot #2, 100% of the trips permitted on Lot #6, 100% of the trips permitted on Lots 8 & 9, and 50% of the trips permitted on Lot #10. Figure 2 and Figure 3 illustrate the resulting no -build and build DHV's used in the following analyses. Traffic Congestion Levels of service (LOS) at two-way stop control (TWSC) intersections are determined by the average control delay on the minor street approach(s); measured in seconds per vehicle. The LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections are shown in the following table: LOS Avg. Delay A <10 B s15 C s25 D <_35 E s50 F >50 Meadowland Park Lot #2 September 19, 2008 Page 3 Historically, the LOS E/F threshold of 50 seconds average delay per vehicle has been used to define the limit of acceptable traffic congestion conditions at TWSC intersections. It should be noted that TWSC intersections which are located on high -volume major roadways almost always experience long delays on the side street left -turn movement(s). This is because those movements have the lowest priority, and must yield to the major street traffic (which in turn essentially experiences little or no delay). Unlike other intersections (signalized, roundabouts and multi -way stop), overall intersection delay is not calculated at TWSC intersections. The impact of the additional 13 a.m, peak and 14 p.m. peak hour trips on future levels of service and average delays was analyzed by performing both background (previously permitted) and future (with the additional trips) capacity analyses, and comparing the results of the two sets of analyses. All analyses were performed using existing geometric conditions which include exclusive southbound left -turn and northbound right -turn lanes which were installed on Hinesburg Road for Meadowland Park: Meadowland Drive also has separate left- and right -turn lanes for traffic exiting the park. The following tables present the results of those analyses. The letter denotes the level of service, and the following number in parentheses represents the corresponding average delay in seconds per vehicle. 2009 AM (DHV) Background With Project Intersection Approach - Movement (Previously (With Additional Permitted Trips) Project Trips) Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Dr. A (10) A (10) Hinesburg Road - SB LT Meadowland Drive - WB LT C (23) C (24) Meadowland Drive - WB RT B (13) B (13) 2009 PM (DHV) Background With, Project Intersection Approach - Movement (Previously (With Additional Permitted Trips) Project Trips) Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Dr. A (8) A (8) Hinesburg Road - SB LT Meadowland Drive - WB LT C (19) C (19) Meadowland Drive - WB RT B (11) B (11) As part of the approval for Meadowland Park, the Vermont Agency of Transportation requested that traffic signal warrants be evaluated for the Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Drive intersection each time a lot is developed. Using 2009 average weekday traffic volumes including the additional project trips, it was determined that the peak -hour and four-hour traffic signal warrants were not satisfied. In these analyses, right -turns exiting the Meadowland Drive approach were deducted and that approach treated as a single -lane approach, as per Section 4C-01 of the MUTCD (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices). With that, the 2009 peak hour left -turn volume exiting Meadowland Drive, including the C A Meadowland Park Lot #2 September 19, 2008 Page 4 additional Lot #2 traffic and the previously permitted trips that have not yet been constructed / occupied, is estimated to equal 5 vph during the a.m. peak and 57 vph during the p.m. peak hour. This is below the minimum threshold volumes of 60 and 75 vph needed to satisfy the four-hour and peak -hour warrants, at 70% of their normal values (the posted speed limit is 40 mph and prevailing speeds exceed that), respectively. Based on the above levels of service and the results of the signal warrant examination, it is our opinion that the additional traffic generated by this project will not warrant signalization of the Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Drive intersection. Conclusion We conclude, based on the foregoing analyses, that the traffic generated by the additional office and warehouse space on Lot #2 will not create adverse traffic congestion conditions on the surrounding roads and intersections. Further, we are of the opinion that the existing roadways and intersections serving Meadowland Park have adequate capacity, and do not require specific major improvements such as traffic signals to accommodate this additional project traffic. Should you have any questions concerning the above or if additional information is desired, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Joc y Carriere, P.E., PTOE PA2006\06057\trafrpt update 9-16-08.wpd C C ATTACHMENT A Turning Movement Figures Fignrc #1 Additional Peak Hour Trips Meadowland Business Park Lot #2 AM Peak Hour VT Route 116 0 9 y v K 2 Meadowland Drive ie 0 T 71 0 3 PM Peak Hour VT Route 116 0 2 y y K 8 Meadowland Drive ie 3 T T 0 0 LDLamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. September 16, 2008 Figure 2 Background Peak Hour Volnnres Meadowland Business Park Lot #2 2009 No -Build AM Peak Hour VT Route I 16 190 159 V K 40 Meadowland Drive le 3 T 71 149 57 2009 No -Build PM Peak Hour VT Route 116 491 36 y y R 176 Meadowland Drive Ae 54 T 71 287 5 Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. 2014 No -Build AM Peak Hour VT Route 116 200 159 y V K 40 Meadowland Drive ie 3 T 21 580 57 20U No -Build PM Peak Hour VT Route 116 518 36 � y K 176 Meadowland Drive IC 54 T a 303 5 September 16, 200B Figure 3 Peak Hour Volirntes With Additional Project Trips Meadowland Business Park Lot #2 2009 Build AM Peak Hour VT Route 116 190 168 y 1 K 42 Meadowland Drive IC 3 T a 549 60 20D9 Build PM Peak Hour VT Route 116 491 38 y y R 184 Meadowland Drive ie s7 T 71 287 5 Lamoureux & Dickinson La Consulting Engineers, Inc. 2014 Build AM Peak Hour VViRoute 116 200 169 y hi R 42 Meadowland Drive L 3 T 71 580 60 2014 Build PM Peak Hour VT Route 116 518 38 y y R 184 Meadowland Drive le 57 T T 303 5 September 16, 2009 J 1 ATTACHMENT B Intersection Capacity Calculations HCS+: Unsir ,lized Intersections Release( .3 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. Carriere Agency/Co.: L&D Date Performed: 9/17/08 Analysis Time Period: 2009 Build AM Intersection: VT 116 / Meadowland Dr. Jurisdiction: South Burlington Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2009 Project ID: Meadowland Lot 42 East/West Street: Meadowland Drive North/South Street: VT Route 116 Int.ersect:i.on Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound—Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 549 60 168 190 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 549 60 168 190 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 5 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No M�i.nor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 3 42 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 42 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 10 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage banes 1 1 Coll f:igur_ati on L R Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 17 8 9 10 11 12 L I L R -- 168 --------- 3 ----- 42 955 198 520 0.18 0.02 0.08 0.64 0.05 0.26 9.6 23.5 12.5 A C B 13.3 B « „ HCS+: UnsiClized Intersections Release( .3 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. Carriere Agency/Co.: L&D Date Performed: 9/17/08 Analysis Time Period: 2014 Build AM Intersection: VT 116 / Meadowland Dr. Jurisdiction: South Burlington Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2014 Project ID: Meadowland Lot #2 East/West Street: Meadowland Drive North/South Street: VT Route 116 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00 — _Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R ---------------------- ----- Volume 580 — 60 -- --- 168 200 ----— Peak --Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 580 60 168 200 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 5 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 3 42 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 42 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 10 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R --Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound -- Movement 1 4 17 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Confi.g L I L R v (vph) 168 3 42 -- C(m) (vph) 930 186 499 v/c 0.18 0.02 0.08 95% queue length 0.66 0.05 0.28 Control Delay 9.7 24.7 12.9 LOS A C B Approach Delay 13.7 Approach LOS B HCS+: Unsif.lized Intersections Release( 3 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. Carriere Agency/Co.: L&D Irate Performed: 6/25/08 Analysis Time Period: 2009 Build PM Intersection: VT 116 / Meadowland Dr. Jurisdiction: South Burlingtorr Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2009 Project ID: Meadowland Lot 42 East/West Street: Meadowland Drive North/South.Street: VT Route 116 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments__ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 287 5 38 491 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 287 5 38 491 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 5 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor. —Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 57 .184 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 57 ,184 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 3 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Approach Movement Lane Config C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay I.IOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 L I L R _ 38 57 184 ---�___- 1253 319 750 0.03 0.18 0.25 0.09 0.65 0.97 8.0 18.7 11.4 A C B 13.1 B 12 HCS+: Unsi( .lized Intersections Release( .3 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. Carriere Agency/Co.: L&D Date Performed: 6/25/08 Analysis Time Period: 2014 Build PM Intersection: VT 116 / Meadowland Dr. Jurisdiction: South Burlington Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2014 Project ID: Meadowland Lot 42 East/West Street: Meadowland Drive North/South Street: VT Route 116 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments___ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 303 5 38 518 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 303 5 38 518 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 5 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 57 184 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 57 184 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R _Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service____ Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config Y(vph) L I L R v 38 57 184 C(m) (vph) 1236 300 734 v/c 0.03 0.19 0.25 95% queue length 0.10 0.70 1.00 Control Delay 8.0 19.8 11.5 1,OS A C B Approach Delay 13.5 Approach LOS B CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURL1NGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 25, 2007 Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Partnership PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Proposed Tenant — 472 Meadowland Drive — Unit #8 Dear Mr. O'Brien: This is in response to your request of July 23, 2007 for a tenant at 472 Meadowland Drive to occupy Unit #8. The proposed tenant is True Limited. The tenant would occupy 5,000 sq. ft. and would be "light manufacturing" use. Pursuant to condition #21 of your 6/6/06 final plat approval, the above described tenant and use is hereby approved. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, li Beth Hinds Director of Planning and Zoning ZONING USE COMPLIANCE REQUEST FORM DATE: 9v /jj d � , ) OCR l � Zlkf-71e BUSINESS NAME: 1'e(/C' MAILING ADDRESS ;3Qo,�;. •f.14N:-PA7WrCk- ZCt-3R%'QV CONTACT PERSON O /3i2+'eo4/ �'js��►'j ADRESS OF PROPOSED USE: Meadowlands Business Complex 472 Meadowlands Drive South Burlington VT EXISTING ZONE: Ind/Open Space ESTIMATED # OF ON SITE EMPLOYEES -6X DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY, INCLUDING ANCILLIARY USES 7 S b CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 22, 2007 Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Partnership PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407-2184 Re: Proposed Tenant — 472 Meadowland Drive — Unit #3 Dear Mr. O'Brien: This is in response to your request of May 22, 2007 for a tenant at 472 Meadowland Drive to occupy Unit #3. The proposed tenant is Bathfitters. The tenant would occupy 5,000 sq. ft. and would be "contractor or building trade facility" use. Pursuant to Condition #21 of your 6/6/06 final plat approval, the above described tenant and use is herby approved. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me Sincerely, i,duli Beth Hinds Director of Planning and Zoning 05/22/2007 TUB 10:17 FAX 8026585002 O'Brien Brothers Agency Z002/002 ZONING USE COMPLIANCE REQUEST FORM DATE.• Mnt 2), ;1 D� BUSINESS NAME: 64 /N r,1 1 e41 ( �v YY�1 6 & r1t/ MAILING ADDRESS P-04AY C/o 7 CONTACT PERSON �X A, � /� , ADRESS OF PROPOSED USE: Meadowlands Business Complex 472 Meadowlands Drive South Burlington VT 41V �� � -' EXISTING ZONE: Ind/Open Space ESTIMATED # OF ON SITE EMPLOYEES 5 DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY, INCLUDING ANCILLIARY USES 6"Cfll 'i f lo,%d � e- e,,J 60ozy rv►� P7 R e4 Is 7721, q e1(- k/ 07/26/2006 WED 9:48 PAX 8026585002 O'Brien Brothers Agency 06/28/2008 1.3:51 FAX 802883180( REILLY OFFICE 1j002/002 1A005 ZONING USE COMPLIANCE REQUEST EOM DATE: G/Ci BUSINESS NAME: MAILING • CONTACT PERSON ADRESS Of PROPOSED USE: Meadowlands Business Complex 472 Meadowlands Drive South Bur ington VT EXISTING ZONE: Ind/Open Space ESTIMATED # OF ON SITE EMPLOYEES DESCRIPTION OIL BUSINESS ACTIVITY, INCLUDING ANCILLIARY USES - - i C- S LR c-b �(`C C 1 (::S-(— J1 WAPATRIMZONING COMP REQ FORM.doc. PAGE ! Of I ZONING USE COMPLIANCE REQUEST FORM DATE: BUSINESS NAME: MAILING ,�lu ADDRESS `7 / CONTACT PERSON�19�`// �// ADRESS OF PROPOSED USE: Meadowlands Business Complex 472 Meadowlands Drive 10 8 C��ow South Burlington VT EXISTING ZONE: Ind/Open Space ESTIMATED # OF ON SITE EMPLOYEES DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY, INCLUDING ANCILLIARY USES N:\PATRICK\ZONING COMP REQ FORM.doc. PAGE 1 OF 1 � 11Glolo ZONING USE COMPLIANCE REQUEST FORM DATE: l f-- BUSINESS NAME: LZ MAILING J `/'� ADDRESS X e,y `iC AzAcLle, ,i �� pZy/fa. CONTACT PERSON ADRESS OF PROPOSED USE: Meadowlands Business Complex 472 Meadowlands Drive 14 South Burlington VT EXISTING ZONE;. Ind/Open Space X ESTIMATED # OF ON SITE EMPLOYEES S DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY, INCLUDING ANCILLIARY USES N:\PATRICK\ZONING COMP REQ FORM.doc. PAGE 1 OF 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 27, 2006 Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Partnership PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407-2184 Re: Proposed Tenant - 472 Meadowland Drive - Units #1 & 2 Dear Mr. O'Brien: This is in response to your request of July 20, 2006 for a tenant at 472 Meadowland Drive to occupy units #1 & 2. The proposed tenant for units #1 & 2 is Shred This, Inc. The tenant would occupy 10,000 sq. ft. and would be "manufacturing & assembly from previously approved materials and components". Pursuant to Condition #21 of your 6/6/06 final plat approval, the above described tenant and use is approved. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Juli Beth Hinds Director of Planning and Zoning 01/31/2008 THU 14:41 FAX 8026585002 O'Brien Brothers Agency IZO02/002 ZONING USE COMPLIANCE REQUEST FORM DATE: l f 3 \ la b BUSINESS NAME: S C�) U� CA S 6C C_ pa k v' I 1 I C ADL�RE S A4 L,, A t&, / G- A -so a-Z G CONTACT PERSON C �l V, t�S itQ � \t� �" d '� x ADDRESS OF PROPOSED USE: EXISTING ZONE: Ind/Open Space ESTIMATED # OF ON -SITE EMPLOYERS Meadowlands Business Complex 472 Meadowlands Drive South Burlington VT �� DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY, INCLUDING ANCILLIARY USES FY'0 C i�'S 5( viGt A/'A A. S •I O �r GLGA e- --- - Approved? Yes No 12) Ito f? PAGE I OF I N:\ AI)RIENE\ZONING COMP RHQ FORM,&c. �� �% AP % PAP southburlington PLANNING & ZONING April 18, 2008 Scott Homsted Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Re: Site Plan #SP-08-28 472 Meadowland Drive Dear Mr. Homsted: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Administrative Officer on April 15, 2008. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months. Should you have any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, ' APo R-� Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Permit Number SP- O� - CITY OF SOUTH BUFLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, (802) 658-5000 (p) (802) 658-5002 (f) Vermont 05403 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page#) Book 758 Page 461 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax# Same as above 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Scott Homsted Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, Vermont 05446 (802) 878-0375 (p) (802) 878-9618 (f) 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 472 Meadowland Drive South Burlington, Vermont 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1705-00107 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) The existing use is consistent with the original approval for the property including up to 18,750 s.f. for general office and 41,250 s.f. for other approved activities including: Contractor or building trade facility Light Manufacturing Manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components Printing & binding production facilities Research facility or laboratory C b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) The purpose of this amendment application is for two minor modifications. The first is to a add a 3' x 3' x 4' high outside storage unit to be located adjacent to the easterly (back) entrance to Unit 1. The second amendment request is to change the chain link fence around the stormwater detention pond to a split rail fence with woven wire backing. The split rail fence will provide a more pleasing aesthetic while still providing a deterrent to unauthorized entrance to the pond. c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain The building is 50,000 Square Feet d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) The building is a single story with mezzanine. 10,000 s.f. of mezzanine area is proposed. The elevation for the building will be 35 feet. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not Applicable f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 30 office employees + 40 non -office employees = 70 total employees. No more than 20 company vehicles proposed. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Not Applicable 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 348,480 Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing 0 % / 0 sq. ft. Proposed 14.3 % / 50,000 sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 % / 0 sq. ft. Proposed 38.5 % / 133,808 sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 0 % / 0 sq. ft. 2 Proposed 29.9 % / 5,379 sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 233,500 * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (Including interior renovations): $ $1,500,000 b) Landscaping: $ 27,500 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) Parking lots, circulation roads, utilities, stormwater detention,_ grading: $500,000. 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) 389 VTE b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) 53 VTE c) P.M. peak hour for entire property (in and out) 55 VTE 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE Summer 2008 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowners. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) The owners of record are provided on a separate attached sheet. 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SI ATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: qljbld� REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete i, Pj rlctKr of Pla ing & Zoning or Designee 4 Administrative Officer EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. o Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) o Survey data (distance and acreage) o Contours (existing and finished) o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations o Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping o Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways o Zoning boundaries o Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) o Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) o Location of septic tanks (if applicable) o Location of any easements o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard o North arrow o Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be down casting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) o Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations o If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE ❑ Site Plan $ 186* ❑ Amended Site Plan $ 186* ❑ Administrative Site Plan $ 86* * Includes $l 1.00 recording fee NOTIFICATION LIST MEADOWLANDS BUSINESS COMPLEX 472 MEADOWLAND DRIVE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Chase Properties & Development, Ltd PO Box 2283 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0254-00005 Green Acres, Inc. PO Box 2123 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0860-R 1150 Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 Tax Map 1705-00125 (All under 0860-01150) Scott L. & Roberta S. Pennington 26 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00026 Larry W. & Ginette D. Brainard 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00028 Burlington Properties LTD c/o Dan Kalman P.O. Box 9210 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0860-01020 Michael Gravelin 1060 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-10700 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 Tax Map 0860-01100 James C. and Sachi H. Rowley 1160 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-01160 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-01175 Bradley C. Gardner P.O. Box 21 Colchester, VT 05446 Tax Map 0860-01398 Nancy and Gary Lines 16 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00016 Christopher L. and Theri Davis 18 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00018 Kathryn and Mark Boucher 20 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Nancy G. and Terrance J. Sheahan 24 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00024 NOTIFICATION LIST MEADOWLANDS BUSINESS COMPLEX 472 MEADOWLAND DRIVE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Homer and Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-01375 The Rock of Burlington P.O. Box 464 Milton, VT 05468 Tax Map 0257-0046 C KIMBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 Fax (802) 878-9618 April 8, 2008 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Meadowlands Business Complex 472 Meadowland Drive - South Burlington, Vermont Dear Ray, Please find attached a site plan amendment application, plans and fee for the Meadowlands Business Complex at Lot 2 of the Meadowland Industrial Park. The applicant, O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC., proposes to amend their site plan to allow two minor modifications. The first is to a add a 3' x 3' x 4' high outside storage unit to be located adjacent to the easterly (back) entrance to Unit 1. The second amendment request is to change the chain link fence around the stormwater detention pond to a split rail fence with woven wire backing. The split rail fence will provide a more pleasing aesthetic while still providing a deterrent to unauthorized entrance to the pond. Please review the plans and application at your earliest convenience and contact us with any questions or comments you may have. Sincerely, Scott Homsted swh enclosure cc: Patrick O'Brien Stephanie O'Brien 05146-ra,6.Wpd � Hlntwe _ vw _V7 P. 4.i9 Al soz -- di-td by �nD/ry/A: — r.---------- - do nol "' °^ t"o Meodowlo Drive _ - ---- — - l . M e Y.. ear l�ade- jl �- D4 i� r s� /ram T I. ee ec �.anrar a 2007 4'r {' cme s> Poes .,..,. �� ® xr um • /" `.,,_.-" , ,.. / `� Rerrhrced rubber- B� g morerro/ ...-M'�.,. ------- \ hox (O9 w//0. 3 / n. r x:'-....,......GYASS r va- yrudsr4. ; _I _ _ _ i t / j/ I Rwlmg mirruro yyyyded bark mul J, X mA' dwth ---at and rsnore dr r%K rob b.Hp bock It m tw 1/3 of roorbov eefo-s Al a. Earth Haring Cory. j • r 4'..nma nx- Pad yi " / _ - - I.` y '1 j I s' camyocred fl-morn* aria rape Mooring mirraro \ / / 1 crosnuorla,. I i' i 1 Existin Pond r � I 9 e i rMg .R.eyode --- -, r suyyo-r Interior Parking Landscaping Calculation: / < i - 11/1,/ j - —I I- Grow Arch of Pakrrg Cot = BO' wide x I.iI' long = 24640 sq.R J / I i' / ysagk• //1r Aron of lair sq. I moterwl Iran dargssd stands /s9trNM = 1d6I0 a Q/0 = 2664 n. / 1 ��.. /.: / / \ � ///y /j / I AbN Remols aY m bhabgradmra A=Pm~ =2760 sq. It /\ 1 Unf Mt Tree Planting in Landscape Detail Mrs Prgoossd ORIAdirg (416'-8•by�10) l l 54000 sq ft \\� ,� �l �/ / l�,s• / fit! i1 CLASS 11 Wet/ands .,�/ `h p / 1 f 1 , �.'J y I Re/e9 to , n fl- Nl / l Q/ J;" `r. i%�'�. i 1 3 t yr �// ( I I� U Determinotim Na. 7 i Ste` / i / l I 2007-39e dared J 1111102 /n oddlt-al hf—ot1w Ho new disturbance of saes »lea n fes \ h'—,y e \ •1 I l! 4' r r co d a Pod j l; P d / �l I liar I I or we zo-d. buffer r A , 1 1 i/.. / \ ✓x lamrkm L b. dlfu'rnhpf gP' / I I I 1 1 I Owner d' fUJn/%COnt Information. 0VnWo Mroabs/and,, CLC hy 20' P.Q Box 2184 R.acr. esr Re 1.o+ a ft 0 South BurCrlgton, yr 0540J \, 1 / l ! rt / / ! �_•q%\'" 1 1 / / Areas ( 'v J 1 \ •� � f ` � � l D � d 3 / ) � � / / i `\ \ I � i Lot J Tots' o-eo - a 0a Dare: Jss sea n ti \ 1 � 1 T /\ 11\ \ % Sum P^lure I� LpOp- Sooce Zening Dhd-t / ✓& 3877 4J9 ,IViI � ;11 I y� � kglrstriol and I I fi,o / 1 111 f l l Landscaping Schedule I '� / kr / if I I II 11 41 I11 I 1 PII II III 11I I ormnran &cs o antiry s�moa Legend I 'kl-4 ,• Ao,rno, rile s'-10'rdl 27 ®no -- - - -_ -- / I+ I I I .� ,, v�,q,� !i s++rr mrw,r _ i' aw --- �" / f •�• / I m yo<..: o:ro- 2 1/2 3- cw 10 t.. n, - — n.,asrr rh. ar Ryrr a wr i3 q / 11 1 411 `x»�e arEs na/ohe°�„ ,-, _.... /yyy sal I i ..,sx�-. Err rho yamd amrax f ...4 �. l{�I 1j Rd Ot., ,a 2//2-J•ca✓ {� eo ® ererhg x..-mvdd. III/I I�/f`-�espdi�� �� �,j %1J I 1 r ice s=7'rav 11 t�N� i-i Emrhgn�r a+.m 3 vrfS• ti � 11 \ �\ �= � � � �\ '� � �` /�i I Wes, duo -----3'------ i4w r¢,ir,.e y.«le nowhgapp✓e 2 r/z" .i'cw arc, erareo b.. Scott J Roberto tar Via. 209 P.JW 1\\\1 nvn/ -�/ ft XG . ew SYorrn tndad . �/ _ SY Eestem MR, Cadar 4=5' tare —tam- 2Y1 o He. gm.:.o♦s _ s-4'', ' Ostat/ar, t`d ii / tl rw�aoaeetdv w>= /� / / ///� % % ®% _ •�7. _ _ i / _ / j I L7egohg ,Fmlae' Bar Harbor' J gd. 45 Additional Landscape Plan, Details and Cost Schedule `'` i/ N '�__ `���\ • _ _ ssMIMMMMMfaaM++ra++ss avow Pmd 4� _ - / to be provided by Landscape Architect. AWxrar ft. ®wr47 Lot /i/ Munson Earth 111,11 III IIN11it Mowng Corp. / ✓Nu b651PoaU • C\'��/• __ �i�� f 1 =��� I/ I ,' anbar 1Q 2CO3 / �Aneoge: BC a "✓. -r -- f fAuadrsnf Zanlnp O� i n�v, nn rane Lorry R Cin Broino d yN 211 P.2B2elle i W, J-v 160' Z00' Sar SCale 1' = 40" 16 2007 m1bld cmdensr Pods Povenart ( Unie 1 m11— s=h ,arr 4 2007 4'r 4' cmaW pods sw1 27,, 2006 Yale defoa; hmdkgo access a.b 24 2006 to A-th Pme seh 2,; 2006 A-* _ rMr mood bars Ov- areryr•e 1) Scott d• Roberto Penn4rgton V&. 209 P. J26 Ex. 5MH �f5 RAn:J44.00" \ o• AIDIr Ex. 1mr ewmet ne. - Lot I Munson Earth Noting Carp. Lot 10 Summer /Ce ✓b%ht erec MTC v-tu- VoL J87 P. 4J9 — Ex..SMH /4 RMr=341.47' or c_ 'ter® A"r+r`b"ya Meadow/a Drive ---- _ ` -•r'� hang -stub 24' ADS ` 1 341.�..�..�. awesr _ t 13743' _ - - - - V99 MIX Ida 7/ . 5 .z4aaB ro * 'o -540 of "`... rwcrkrx '" IF 500 J, / oaw ft W ft 54 OM sq. t.//I //1 ll�l / � l / �t` l J It I / �/ \ / l ,; v >< J+CxS' ,'' p --,wrr sals• / l ity l ! b I„ Y/ny Imo' 'd\vvw / / I USN 70 `evacre. :fin / _ M e.. w L / IaMl[� vs / N / atewM pled �lr 20 / 1 - role Ill Ibr aStarrn I �dMWin`'' Rw drebt r oboe S- Sar droAt Lorry d' 0/nett. 8ra/nord IVol. 211 P.182 lot _7 a';1Jd 49' 330El.. SNtI M 330.85 B5 RMr�339. 71-�- O of Inv. our J30.B1 B-/n v. Ms337. 1' 505,10' 8. /n v. h=33202" u Ihibrbed crosbvctiwn _-ems B• Inv. out=3J1.9 " alkft- 407r A e of ,✓ I - Aim "eprfhwrl I "'CLASS Derv: / aa-- i ! 7 l l I / I Abe cmaNecrh+l I I I A, a Arrcin¢ see aroA 1 I i 37ss ,, .I I Existing Pond I ry� / I�e'e94 I awok / i ''Hntt Arrchg ' 'hWo WM' / '\ T eesenrert r \� \ I I O V CLASS // Wetlands ni Refs- to Cond'tian& Use Deter m t/an No. VA/ `° 2001-398 deted I nl Il/1/01 for addition& mformotim. No nee dsturbonce of C— // wet/Dods ywudr I frond buffc- h�4 proposed ten van I / / Dan s I his, 1 Lot 3 .ARrtmer Ice Jo t Venture / Vol J87 P. 439 I \ car o . S. , 111 �1 1 Muns Earth 11110 I1 1111 I 1 MO ng Corp ki hr a 651 Pogo R17 / a 18, 2WJ Acreo9e.' 8 83 7g / S yea AMOF Ante .its Detala ��� OP- 655. Ex. SMH Hance 6• Marie Oubois Va! 179 P. 126 Notes: I lhir o nor a b-dw > X /igor'ty tires s5owr ws /sine o pM -~ 7tranwrd 8-t— Ask - ske.-w- free• by nraw Con-Arhg E 9Msss d,- Apra 1.; 1994 recoGM At K6 JM P."9e h brs wry a S ffi fi q gM L-i Rxvr4 I r I Location Mao Owner & App//eont /nformotion: OVnbn Meoabrfand; LLC P.O. Box 2184 South 8arfmgton, Vr 054ay Areas• rota✓ area = 8.00 acres (J48,480 W. ft) Zonft.- htobst,MV wed Open Space Zoning 0/strY t Lot Cotvroge hsrbw 9rAeee Arne N r _ Ase_s 0 d Ot I #AA /YNwMt O K OR N A 54OW IA Mwwr ^O7e at 124// I #1A reM 13407e sf I imar I 6Or► nw,6ww olxrrO. -- r lass POf*#?0 44000 sq.ft. NbrMous 1V tnbution/Cont—to- • I space/2,000 sq.tt - 20 spaces 14750 sq. R. Office Voce a J5 .gooces/1, 000 sq. IT - 66 spaces 10, 000 sqft. warehouse (mezzanine) •1 spoces/2, 000 sq. ft. - 5 spaces rot& Spaces Required - 91 .;Dotes Prgoosed Parking $.aces - 100 (/nd./5 handicapped) — - - — FYges-ry Lhe or Rkjrr of Nby ---KN Ehrhg ground conrow ® &*tAg aeVe- maMab lJ E w' g cotM bash - - .-- -- &&Mv asw- /Me - - - Ebrhg wetsr /he y-y .ge�pg E-&tt9n h,a -t / water role - . -- • -- Eatsthg face M'WY\ Eithg rood /he a Nw kmineir •e ♦ Nw owrmaaae ass Ante Nw cmahucHo+ /hrR Mchg o' 20' 1. M. 120' too, 200' 801- SCale 1•- 40• ��,p �!t m/ /encet UnJr , ouhNs sro-age UnR 1 swh Val Febrvny 4 r, 4' cmwnsm- poC � powmenr nr mhmm 4' x <' conwnser pow arM1 aM 1/-Xl 9. 2 Sgorembs /S 2C06 Augu t ja 2 parkhg pr % pmd Ins swtr swlr 9/ 9/G6 B/JO�gy JAy 17, 2008 Ney 2j 2006 wro 6, bmdAvp access rrcvnrs Nrb. stone dp edge sM swh j/21 FJ�LN Obts nMed Oee OBm Checked.. Dore Design !A✓ Site Plon Drown F.WAIW Checked Meadowlands Business Complex Stole lr= Lot 2 Meadow/and Industrial Park Date Nry.I20M p_j,.t 05148 1 472 Ateadow/ond ,9n- South H dvtgton, Vermont A'RA9S 8 LANSINC Consulting drngineenv Inc. 164f Alain Stree4 ColeAester, Vermont 06446 fO \ Summed /ca ,hint .n�° ��,E. sutr /,).. Lot 7 / flan tune r ii"""=11% Rim=J4 00' Va! J87 P.4J9 /nJJ106 lnv in ..BB Ex. C iai d0'x2In0v'. or MO.81 /nRv in,4,2 ��­ SUH B M2.02' Rijn=J4I 42 lr•ba•wd o•nsfrus••n s �'- -- -- nv our=JJI.9 ROW JJ270 B' l - l699— ex. B" PVC x © H,wdWW Meadow/a Drive v .._......,.,.�'" - \ E,. 24'AO.S if y4. 'fri'��.---� .•,II / t cu/srr / 40N 0 1 h 77 Fg Curve �.0.1,�----- _ / — \ 1ev r e e, pwlr R-540.15 ro sa-yyt__�,T,h. Erew ,.fucae °N 24' 4s8 '/ _';.i��;'� a�•r••.r s°'e / ,.."CLASS y`a Lot 1 , Munson Earth AI -mg carp. ; / f ,}� ~J-4 ! ale, ! a 1 - :I„r 'rl I I .. ar�w ¢ l / l to. a owrronbep �'""' Ilv :I I I 1 r� d t` l / o eke of mnaueorA,,. I Existing Pond i 71 If // i f l l ® f/r, �' 1 I Location Mop / r/ l 0 Pn wtseees -. f///1 / I �Ii�iir r v r l � ufs � ��,� � ) Fr / / ,�wpd it f 3 /// 1. r � '//l / 1 u °�-+a"(' y,•,�y,,,a / f f � /1 1 Owner &• Applicant /nformotion.• -..... o'9nen Maodowland4 LLC f r� // P0. Box 2184 �/ //'. / AS�sto ( Jam'- U,l f •.•rd ny a \ '. ////f'. I I South BuHkgtm, VT 0540J Areas (P4r/o6p'osadd' byf2h61 g) r, / ' F // enaab9ee6, / ratd 800 (348,480 ,n. R.) I / / 50• cda rq ft. f Zoning. - hat lndus&kV and Op- Space Zming District ^11111 / Lot Cotnrooe /I / j 1 I F."/ev. s .7:,1.5' �o`--,«. sus• / 1 �" I mp CLASS // Wet/ands •rorw•9e .a,Axw A- l Mai Afb~ m, q/,rs. 7� ..... / l �I I \� Ref- to cmditi-al e h unl1 r / /l I 1 I U Use DetatIvIh oth*7 Na \ / b �_ yip• / !( Y� ./{ 2001 J98 doted ry / // / / / I ' 1 m oddr'tfmd mfcrmotlm. No new d'aturbmro of 0.. // -&-aa or wnHmd buff- f \ f() /'1 r Tj~ h _x rdrd PrMosM. \ // _ ♦ /Pocntrm I be abr ed Y l / r tin, at cmawoa s / l -r � R+P .rot o.? a / � if I /r•. aI, \ •, / / , , - c, '�'` / r /i ..... . �. � •, 1 / a/ r S r r / \ / /��\ af�wrlA.wwlal / / Tg f� �, mrJ vi - rare l l l l //gam 9 tty 387 P.4J9 i f ii f 20' rw.rPdmy. / / / / /. ail` / �/� / `�\\ 1\j1\I 1 ��/, .Aanmr/ro ✓oint Vm J 42' we r < f'a n„n <rkn / ep11j1I IIII'IIIII I IA I\/ �• r / a pawd prl l�l '• I I I 111 1 I I 1114 I I I II I ./ / 1 II I I �.\ f 'Ti//111 iI Notes: }`\ 1'.qi x- - ��r'"�N'd� ]wgrtorme a..n... t�,r -rr'b r...er� '\ I !` --..r x Nmn-rr 1. sn., o. avn \ V t \ \ \\ 1 ' _ � e� - / /' / 0,.,,.'rn9 E10— mr.e Ap, 2.1 I .scu-ota fi �tt,ne .sla sf,r \\Y.,\\\\ ��-- �/1 I li -- -- '�'W.%/ / I n*m.aenn»aywf.w.mannyw.c�eBw,.wo« �rerr fj / sew \ 'U• � � - � / / \ wrs 9 e lol r 7 / ///� Detentkn Qafd �/ `r Alry 9lnlr 40- W /; , w•,•r �, .:'::-=� —a— Lot 2 a.. Muns Earth 11111 1111l1Corpil�i; 4 _ _ a 651 Page JS7 14 2pJ / 411 Acreage'. 8.7_ Y / AYw ✓f /" `1 •, /'�1 ___�� �_�=%� 3� a..,.,ararae< / � 655.63 b,n, /1W Ope• r�nce � D-ig awn Check W: 1 -' F• �- _ .�- f Ham- X Mb ie Dvbda �., Vol. 179 P. 126 Scale A6w ,row nMM - E. SMH Date ; " dwns See OefaiRs Rnn=JAi02'2 —_, roe mime Scoff d Roberto Logy R 0mette Palnhgtm B omord Pro Vd. 209 P.J26 V.I. 211 P.2a2 O st er A Powsrr4nt 0 M � A 34LW. d 7A.!•' .slf Powmen ea07e ,/. N.1/ A hM Lb 1.lad7e M. .$Sf SOf F t co8Rf Panting 40, 000 aqR ebtMouae/D/aMburtart/cmtroatr • I Ira-/Z 000 acre. - 20 votes 18,750 sq. ft. ON1ce space J5 4o asy7, 000 sqR „ 66 space, 10,000 ark R. wwM-- (me:zon, .) •1 40 c ,,/2 0L70 aq ft. m 5 vote, rotd _moo Requhed 91 vooss P-)--d P-*/ng .�ootea - 100 (md./5 hmdicopped) Legend -i- st,+wr ow,ueJ Peer — - - — av:ry cne o- Rytr of xny —NI E Au g ground cmMvm m Eri,rp,9 news monhda � Exbrn9 mrrh bavr ,-- Exhrrnq mws l,re ix oa E,bryn np„r,r /wore- wro . — • — E„arsg rwm rvv'v"`rv� Ewb[h9 emd lAs ____-yam_____ hyw Muted qos U . Hew kmneie • • Abw �,rnnor, awr A.,m Hen cm,frvctkvr Mr/r /mcig 0' 1. 4d 90' J20" ISO' 200' Bar Scoie r as 40• r 2007 reMaee candenar gods pavement or Unit I errranm mm 1s1//��7,/�/1b%7 eWauyy & 2007 4' s 4' candelas poW ,e1/ 9� r•mbs IA 2006 porkn9 wry f .$ 2001 groeh¢ pard nwt ], 20M grae d fad haa�ctpped acme., ,sA 20M reewaw vrlD ,rare dr(p edge ,w* sy2J/M rwwyse o,ea.tonron _.. a dee oat. Ar Site Plan FMP/SNH Meadow/ands Business Complex ,by.1 „ Lot 2 Mecdowiond industrioi Pork et 05/46 472 Meado•knd D fm South BrH7irgtm, Hslnmt 'LBWS B LiffSING Con&UfiWW L'r{ysnaera, rne. .. " " F slain Street Cotchsstera Yesmont 054WS CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 22, 2007 Patrick O'Brien PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: Site plan application #SP-07-35 Dear Mr. O'Brien: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the Administrative Officer on May 22, 2007. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months. Should you have any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, 0-)T "q Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Permit Number SP- - CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 (802) 658-5000 (p) (802) 658-5002 (t) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page#) Book 758 Page 461 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax# Same as above 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Scott Homsted Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, Vermont 05446 (802) 878-0375 (p) (802) 878-9618 (f) 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 472 Meadowland Drive South Burlington, Vermont 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1705-00107 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) There is no existing use on this property. 1 C b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) The purpose of this amendment application is for two minor modifications. The first is to modify the HVAC pads and condenser units on the south side of the building. The two pads originally shown will be replaced by three pads in a slightly different configuration. Two additional eastern white cedar have been added to provide screening. The second modification is the addition of a small (250 s.f.) area of pavement at the easterly drive in entrance to Unit 1. Proposed lot coverages will still be well under allowable limits. The previously approved use of the property is up to 18,750 s.f. for general office and 41,250 s.f. for other approved activities including: Contractor or building trade facility Light Manufacturing Manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components Printing & binding production facilities Research facility or laboratory c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain The proposed building is 50,000 Square Feet d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) The proposed building will be single story with mezzanine. 10,000 s.f. of mezzanine area is proposed. The elevation for the building will be 35 feet. c) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not Applicable f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 30 office employees + 40 non -office employees = 70 total employees. No more than 20 company vehicles proposed. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Not Applicable 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 348,480 Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing 0 % / 0 sq. ft. Proposed 14.3 % / 50,000 sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 % / 0 sq. ft. Proposed 38.5 % / 133,808 sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 0 % / 0 sq. ft. Proposed 29.9 % / 5,379 sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 233,500 * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (Including interior renovations): $ $1,500,000 b) Landscaping: $ 27,500 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) Parking lots, circulation roads, utilities, stormwater detention, grading: $500,000. 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) 389 WE b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) 53 WE c) P.M. peak hour for entire property (in and out) 55 WE 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE Summer 2007 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowners. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) The owners of record are provided on a separate attached sheet. 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 3 I hereby certify that all the information accurate to the best of my knowledge,' as part of this application has been submitted and is NATtJRE OF APPLICANT L— --- SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION S�190 REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Director bf`Planning & Zoning or Designee 0 I NOTIFICATION LIST MEADOWLANDS BUSINESS COMPLEX 472 MEADOWLAND DRIVE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Chase Properties & Development, Ltd PO Box 2283 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0254-00005 Green Acres, Inc. PO Box 2123 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0860-R 1150 Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 Tax Map 1705-00125 (All under 0860-01150) Scott L. & Roberta S. Pennington 26 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00026 Larry W. & Ginette D. Brainard 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00028 Burlington Properties LTD c/o Dan Kalman P.O. Box 9210 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0860-01020 Michael Gravelin 1060 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-10700 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 Tax Map 0860-01100 James C. and Sachi H. Rowley 1160 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-01160 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-01175 Bradley C. Gardner P.O. Box 21 Colchester, VT 05446 Tax Map 0860-01398 Nancy and Gary Lines 16 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00016 Christopher L. and Theri Davis 18 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00018 Kathryn and Mark Boucher 20 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Nancy G. and Terrance J. Sheahan 24 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00024 C NOTIFICATION LIST MEADOWLANDS BUSINESS COMPLEX 472 MEADOWLAND DRIVE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Homer and Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-01375 The Rock of Burlington P.O. Box 464 Milton, VT 05468 Tax Map 0257-0046 I KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc, 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 Fax (802) 878-9618 May 17, 2007 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Meadowlands Business Complex 472 Meadowland Drive - South Burlington, Vermont Dear Ray, Please find attached a site plan amendment application, plans and fee for the Meadowlands Business Complex at Lot 2 of the Meadowland Industrial Park. The applicant, O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC., proposes to amend their site plan to allow two minor modifications. The first is to modify the HVAC pads and condenser units on the south side of the building. The two pads originally shown will be replaced by three pads in a slightly different configuration. Two additional eastern white cedar have been added to provide screening. The second modification is the addition of a small (250 s.f.) area of pavement at the easterly drive-in entrance to Unit 1. Proposed lot coverages will still be well under allowable limits. Please review the plans and application at your earliest convenience and contact us with any questions or comments you may have. Sincere y, Scott Homsted swh enclosure cc: Patrick O'Brien 05116rray5.wpd CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 12, 2007 Scott Homsted Krebs & Lansing 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Re: 472 Meadowland Drive - O'Brien Dear Mr. Homsted: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the Administrative Officer on March 12, 2007. Please note the conditions of approval including that you obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy cDonougf Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Permit Number SP-=-1--- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) O'Brien Brothers Agency Inc. P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 (802) 658-5000 (p) (802) 658-5002 (t) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page#) Book 758 Page 461 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax# Same as above 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Scott Homsted Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, Vermont 05446 (802) 878-0375 (p) (802) 878-9618 (f) 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 472 Meadowland Drive South Burlington, Vermont 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1705-00107 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) There is no existing use on this property. C b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) The purpose of this amendment application is to add 4' x 4' concretes pads suitable for HVAC equipment for each unit. 9 creeping juniper have been removed in the front of the building to allow for the pads. 5 eastern white cedar have been added as additional screening to the south side of the building. The previously approved use of the property is up to 18,750 s.f. for general office and 41,250 s.f. for other approved activities including: Contractor or building trade facility Light Manufacturing Manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components Printing & binding production facilities Research facility or laboratory c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain The proposed building is 50,000 Square Feet d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) The proposed building will be single story with mezzanine. 10,000 s.f. of mezzanine area is proposed. The elevation for the building will be 35 feet. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not Applicable f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 30 office employees + 40 non -office employees = 70 total employees. No more than 20 company vehicles proposed. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Not Applicable 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 348,480 Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing 0 % / 0 sq. ft. Proposed 14.3 % / 50,000 sq. ft. so, b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 % / 0 sq. ft. Proposed 38.4 % / 133,808 sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 0 % / 0 sq. ft. Proposed 29.9 % / 5,379 sq. ft. 2 C d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 233500 * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (Including interior renovations): $ $1,500,000 b) Landscaping: $ 27,500 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) Parking lots, circulation roads, utilities, stormwater detention, grading: $500,000. 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) 389 WE b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) 53 WE c) P.M. peak hour for entire property (in and out) 55 WE 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Mondaythrough Friday 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE Spring 2007 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowners. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) The owners of record are provided on a separate attached sheet. 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 3 C I hereby certify that all the information accurate to the best of my knowle4ge--.— DATE OF SUBMISSION as part of this application has been submitted and is S-1-ONA/TURE OF APPLICANT SIGNAIUA OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Incomplete Director of PI irector, Planni & Zoning Date rd NOTIFICATION LIST MEADOWLANDS BUSINESS COMPLEX 472 MEADOWLAND DRIVE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Chase Properties & Development, Ltd PO Box 2283 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0254-00005 Green Acres, Inc. PO Box 2123 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0860-R 1150 Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 Tax Map 1705-00125 (All under 0860-01150) Scott L. & Roberta S. Pennington 26 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00026 Larry W. & Ginette D. Brainard 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00028 Burlington Properties LTD c/o Dan Kalman P.O. Box 9210 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0860-01020 Michael Gravelin 1060 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-10700 Malcolm Willard 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 Tax Map 0860-01100 James C. and Sachi H. Rowley 1160 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-01160 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-01175 Bradley C. Gardner P.O. Box 21 Colchester, VT 05446 Tax Map 0860-01398 Nancy and Gary Lines 16 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00016 Christopher L. and Theri Davis 18 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00018 Kathryn and Mark Boucher 20 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Nancy G. and Terrance J. Sheahan 24 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00024 NOTIFICATION LIST MEADOWLANDS BUSINESS COMPLEX 472 MEADOWLAND DRIVE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Homer and Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-01375 The Rock of Burlington P.O. Box 464 Milton, VT 05468 Tax Map 0257-0046 I 1 —555 Scott & Roberto Pennington ✓W 209 P. J26 Lot 1 Munson Earth Modng Corp. Noma d' Marie Dubois Vol. 179 P. 126 S 655.63' Ex. SV1/ /2 Rijn=339.75's�— B"/ay. m=JJ21' �— 8" M. M-JJ2.02' 8"/n v. out=3J1.96' /. II �--'..._.CLASS l/ i i I I e ✓t 7 I ! New mrtn.cr.c ,l . I A d. I Sre stide. I i Existing Pond I I II I I � I I .J I � —RRebented 20' / q � CLASS // Wet/ands Rehr to Canditi6n l G1 Use Det—motion No. 2001-J98 doted 1111/O2 far additional mIb mation. No new disturbance of aoss 8 wetlands or —t1a d buffer prgoo"d. I _.} Rd000te —t-9 20' I psobrtriar eowwns,t orrrror of ao:a s .eewtde Lot J Summer Ice Joint Venture Vd. J87 P. 439 Location Map Owner & Aoo/icant Information: OPrten Meodonbnda LLC P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vr 054OJ Areas• rOW aea - 8.00 acres (J48.480 sq. (t.) Zonho., ilblae&W and Coen 4M" Zoning District Lot Coverage o .9 aV AFA Pornwf o ee of N A 14OW aL 14" Mr Arrn4ra SX&V ar. MjW N A Iofd Co Y34&e ae $4f AW Por*h7g 4a 000 sq. ft N6reh--1Distn9ut,-1Cwre for e 1 apoce/2, 000 so, ft - 20 .sexes Id 750 sq. ft. Office Voce a J.5 spoces/1, 000 sq. ft. - 66 spores 1a 000 sqft. warehouse (mezzonme) "1 spaces/Z 000 sq ft. - 5 .gooces Total Sooces Requxed - 91 spores RProposed Par*mg $votes - 1010'1, hon" Legend / 'i- .w.,.y contra poet e/� —//�� Prgonty Line or Right of Nby ey �y334 Existmq ground contour G/ V G &Wkq serer m—hde r P' VVV ❑ E catch boson MI E afm, sere-er /me Q------- rwtnq wat/lne �0 �w � En'stign hxYont /water wne 0�0, Eoi,.g / ce Notes vas / E ifmg wood line 1. M& b mt o ho.eladry a n Plq -t, Ihes Ao- on M1on a pion ----- 334------ New &,i hed 9,ode a,~ •YeodoeloM Burirea Pak - -14, ear fret" by rn dw Cunning Engneiry doted AR'f 24 /9K recorded n Va me -W fl New luminous FMge 98 a, Me Cn, of Swth 6lefhgton Lond Re 4m -�—� New cmtnuous Or fence • New court -lion Inuit f ring 6. 0' 20' 40' 80' 120' 160' 200 Bar Scale r= 40 4' x 4' condenser pods swh swh swh swn rwn Dote reNsed Description Checked Dote Design 1AJ Site Plon Drawn F7hW/SUIt Checked Scale Meadow/ands Business Complex 1• _ 40• - Date N y 3 2006 Lot 2 Meadow/and Industrial Park Project 05146 472 Meadow/ond Dri`r South Burlington, Vermont XJP�BS B IINSING Consulting Fngineers, Ina , 164 Vain Street, Colchester, hermont 05446 A Summer lee Wht EW-Mg Anturd, Vol. J87 P. 4J9 W'RVW adlift bwe AAnr dk..ty imeodo Drive t Ex. 24" ADS Re47f-ced rubber- -33*- TBA, A ffl�) Bonnet bat on hydrant -'CLASS # 1-d-W. f7- 344 06 .5 J.Planting -,,t.- ---340 f7i,41A grade MO. L.t I Munson Earth Mownq Corp.--4', 6" compacted 340- pAwthig mArtur, 'I �ob, 3.ixisting Pond Interior Parking Landscaping Calculation: &oss Area, of Lot - 60' wide x 434' fan- VA 840 ft C - to be pruned as dFrected by anhRect - &I not -t /eader Gti'wrig mote-W llawq Wft 3 pm.. M-) -qwe~ ba"l, mu/ch, 3' min. depth Ott and - any Wks -# b,,AW be,* r- top 1/3 of footbw before backililbig untie rope train bunk r- support -,h- A01ate- Awrio. oN n--AAmoWVvdl*b Area of Imascoloed islands requked = 24 640 s a io 2664 sq. ft. j taniat ftn, plant pit Area Pm~ 2,760 sq. A }I j %ll � !�l� / / l ?" �1�� / J I Tree Planting in Landscape Detod LOW (4 6by'�2197 sq. ft. W 20' �! J CLASS Wet/ands Refer to Caaditional Use Determ1h Nor? Na. tt Roberto Pennington, Vol 209 P J26 11/1/02 for Owner Information.- additional h7lbfmation Munson E" mawftV CLVP 338, No now dsturbonm 85 -%�unp&d Road Wlw-, VT 05495 of Clow # wetlands ar "Vand b.fA, 4. TI prwasdd Applicant Information: Olinlon &wthers Agmey Inc. j, R*.-te o tklq 20' P.O. a" 2184 South &,,fh7gtcn VT 0540J \ ll l {tj l/ S ` \' ! T ! ~/ // y%� �� t-1.id. sort. # N Arms.- Total ova 800 acres (344480 sq ft.) A If 19 % Lot J Zoning., Su--- /- Joint Venture 311 Va( 387 P 439 bralzriml and Open Space Zoning District Itandsaa Schedule p—ing S&W Qionti(y smnbw Legend I + *4 Aur&k" Ale, 8=-10' me27 JOAF LZ P1—W -. 5,rey co,imi P.#,t Frop-ry 1h,, - Riot of way 7 2 1/2�j" to EW,nq pr-nd -t-r Red Oak 2 1112"J" coi. 4 EW119 -wff -nftle W I f &Whg hyd-t AW4? t.W if Ao --- A- /ZW�� g-%, Raw.* N9 "'OV691010fe, 2 coO. 4 V'4�,c. dense /� # - .o-ld In' to. k 0 fl eOW tensed -5' to# Easton, Nhft* Ce" 4' cantahler 18 = t Owc Detention d i ga. 45 ci A F(-') Additional Landscape Plan, Details, and Cost Schedule NO to be provided by Landscape Architect. ftm.." APM) few -how Lot 0. Muns Earth 111 MO Corp/ W-R9 All II - &11017 "o, -S ol, I VO/u 0 651 Page J167 - ----- Fb--y 6, 2007 grade''-d-- pb& 216 7 bet, 14 2o0J kj/), 27, 2005 deto,7., hbi,dxbpp� --- -h 17127106 A 8. .1uly 25, 2006 b/- p-- to A -trio, pa- -h 17125106 M,,y 2J, 2006 ... pog'b"Pe� swh �2JI06 D-orpti- Checked Design IAJ OW OAP-OWO WO LcndscGpe Plcn Drawn FAOPI.VNH tc-h pis Chocked j Meadow/ands Business Complex Hainer & Marie Dubois Vol. 179 P. 126 20' 40' 80' 120' 160' 200' Scale I- - 40' I/- P Date M-Y j 2006 Lot 2 Meadowland Industrial Park Larry Curette Bar Scale I" = 40' Pro' ct 05146 472 Meadow/and Dnm South Burlington,Vitrinant fil'a0hard Vol. 211 P.282 L4,YSfiW tbiLrud'An.V Th.9,ineem Inc. I0>64 Alain Street, Colchester, Vermont 05446 KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 Fax (802) 878-9618 February 20, 2007 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Meadowlands Business Complex 472 Meadowland Drive - South Burlington, Vermont Dear Ray, Please find attached a site plan amendment application, plans and fee for the Meadowlands Business Complex at Lot 2 of the Meadowland Industrial Park. The applicant, O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc., proposes to amend their site plan to add 4' x 4' concrete pads suitable for HVAC equipment for each unit in the complex. 9 creeping juniper have been removed in the front of the building to allow for the pads, while 5 eastern white cedar have been added for additional screening on the south side of the building. Please review the plans and application at your earliest convenience and contact us with any questions or comments you may have. Sincerely, Scott Homsted swh enclosure cc: Patrick O'Brien os 146-«ya.Wpd CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 October 18, 2006 O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407 Dear Property Owner: A?Z- Hmd OLTMb Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." Please call our office at 846-4106 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: Scott Homsted 'CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 October 18, 2006 Chase Properties & Development, Ltd PO Box 2283 South Burlington, VT 05407 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours; or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. vrcaaiaa6a/ Shows -------------------- MATTHEWTHORSEN Photographs, paintings and collages. Full Tank Glass Gallery, Church Street, Burl- ington. Through August. MATTHEW THORSEN Photographs. Blue Star Cafe, Main Street, Win- ooski. Through October. legals ------------------------ PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP- MENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board wilt hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, November 7, 2006 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Appeal #AO-06-04 of Century Partners, LP appealing the deci- sion of the Administrative Officer to deny Certificate of Occupancy #CO-06-54 to use site modifica- tions at 4 Market St. 2. Final plat application #SD-06- 87 of Gary & Diane Provost to sub- divide a 2.68 acre lot developed with a single family dwelling into three (3) lots of 1.18 acres (lot #1), .90 acres (lot #2), and .60 acres (lot 93), 1925 Dorset St. 3. Final plat application #SD-06- 88 of O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC to amend a previously approved planned unit development consist- ing of adding 10,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine space for a total of 60,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area, 472 Meadowland Dr. 4. Preliminary plat application #SD-06-89 & final plat applica- tion #SD-06-90 of Michael Dugan to amend a previously approved plan for a planned unit develop- ment consisting of: 1) a four (4) unit multi -family dwelling, and 2) three (3) mixed use commercial building. The amendment consists of adding three (3) multi -family dwelling units to a commercial building, 401 Patchen Rd. John DinkLage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hatt. October 18, 2006 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGE- MENT REVIEW HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT contact Larry Kupferman, HR support groups DON'T SEE A SUPPORT group here that meets your needs? Call Ver- mont 2-1-1, a program of United Way of Vermont. Within Vermont, dial 2-1-1 or 866-652-4636 (toll - free) or from outside of Vermont, 802-652-4636., Monday -Friday, 8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. SEPARATED BY ADOPTION?: Con- cerned United Birthparents, Inc. (CUB) announces local peer sup- port group meeting in Burlington. CUB meetings, offer a safe, confl- dential, and nurturing environment to explore personal experiences re- lated to adoption, relinquishment, search and reunion (or rejection). For those of us who have felt iso- lated, it is a tremendous relief to communicate with others who un- derstand our experience. 3rd Tues- day of the month 6-7 p.m. Unitar- ian Universalist Church on Pearl St., top of Church St., Burlington. Free. Contact Judy, region1dir@ cubirthparents.org, 800-822-2777 ext. 1, www.CUBirthparents.org. 60+ SUPPORT GROUP: Small, on- going, weekly support group to share stories about growing older. For men and women 60 and over. We have fun! Tuesdays, 4-5:30 p.m. Contact Barbara Kester at 657-3668. MITRAL VALVE PROLAPSE/DYSAU- TONOMIA: Group forming for infor- mation sharing purposes. Please call 863-3153. RAINWATER CENTER FOR HIGHER AWARENESS: At the Euro Cafe, Main St. Burlington, for inspirational movies, discussions and medita- tions on the spiritual path how- ever one defines it and speakers including various healing practices to Life coaching to spiritual lead- ers. Develop a deeper connection to your inner spiritual and personal growth. Join us every other Tues- day, 7 p.m. for these free events. Call Alex at 802-233-0046, alex@ rainwatercenteccom or visit web - site www.rainwatercenter.com. LA LECHE LEAGUE: October 11, 9:30-11 a.m., Fletcher Free Library, Burlington. We are a breastfeed- ing support group, we hold free, monthly meetings with a warm and respectful atmosphere; babies and older siblings are always welcome. Come whether you are pregnant or adopting and want to learn about the process; you are experiencing challenges or you are having a great time and would Like to meet other nursing mothers. Call for more information or for breastfeed- ing help, Laura 985-8228. Check ntir waWfa fnr mnra inf,r +i,.n and relentless Love, and their deep- est burning, bubbling, brilliant desire. The group wilt function aF a means for men to support ead other and serve the greater good. We will be working with spiritual practices, the mind and body, and taking on our lives with the utmost integrity, impeccability and open- ness. The group is not a new age group, nor is it a group dedicated to therapy. Info, email zach@ handetgroup.com or call 917-887- 1276. SMART RECOVERY a cognitive behavioral "recovery' program directed at various forms of "ad- diction" which may be either behavioral or substance based. Meeting on WEDNESDAY, 6 p.m., 82 South Winooski Avenue (above the City Market), Burlington, Vt. For information call Bob at 425-4058 or email BobC2me@msn.com. SURVIVORS OF'SUICIDE (SOS):. Have you experienced the impact of a loved one's suicide? Please consider joining us. The Burling- ton support group meets on the 2nd Wednesday of each month, 6:30-7:30 p.m. at the Unitarian Universalist Church, 152 Pearl St. Burlington. The meeting will be in the Susan B. Anthony Room, which is on the second floor at the back end of the building. This is not a therapy group; this is a support group. There is no fee. Please con- tact Cory Goud, M.A., Psychologist - Master, 802-223-4111. GIRL'S NIGHT OUT. Fun support group for single women, discus- sions, weekly activities (cooking, dancing, rock climbing...), child- care solutions. A great alternative to dating! Email horizons4u@hot mail.com. DEBTORS ANON: 12-step recovery group. Do you have a problem with money and debt? We can help.. Mondays, 6-7:15 p.m. First Meth- odist Church. Contact Valerie, 233- 8808. OVEREATERS ANON:12-step recov- ery group. Is what you're eating, eating you? Tuesdays, 7-8 p.m. First Congregational Church, Rt. 15, Essex Jct. Contact 863-2655 for more info. z,urruKi umuur Tor Ex-Jehovah's Witnesses. A group for people who "ive left or are thinking about ng Jehovah's Witnesses, you're alone. Angela, 598-2469. FIBROMYALGIA: Do you experience it? Would you like to be part of a support group? Contact: tobias- 25vt@yahoo.com or call 864-2613 box 423 to leave message. TOPS (Take Off Pounds Sensibly) Chapter Meeting. Bethany Church, 115 Main Street, Montpelier. Wednesdays, 5:15 - 6:15 p.m. For info call Linda at 476-8345 or De- nise at 223-257. FATIGUE AND CHRONIC FATIGUE: Share your experiences and infor- mation, learn about effective pro- tocols. John, 802-343-8161. BEREAVED PARENT SUPPORT GROUP: Every first Monday of the month. at 6:30 p.m. in Enos - burg Falls, 10 Market Place, Main St. Parents, grandparents and adult siblings are welcomed. The hope is to begin a Compassionate Friends Chapter in the area. Info, please call Priscilla at 933-7749. CONCERNED UNITED BIRTHPAR- ENTS: A group offering support if you have lost.a child to adoption or are in reunion or have yet to be- gin your search. 802-849-2244. EATING DISORDERS PARENTAL SUPPORT GROUP for parents of children with or at risk of anorexia or bulimia. Meetings 7-9 p.m., third Wednesday of each month at the Covenant Community Church, Rt. 15, Essex Center. We focus on being a resource and providing ref- erence points for old and new ED parents. More information, call Peter at 802-899-2554. HEPATITIS C SUPPORT GROUP: Second Wednesday of the month from 6-7:30. Community Health Center, second floor, 617 Riverside Ave., Burlington 802-j55-8936. SAVINGS SUPPORT GROUP for all low to moderate -income Vermont- ers who wish to have support around saving, budgeting, manag- ing or investing money. Call Diane at 802-860-1417 x104 for informa- tion. Nv,L ywuN wi Ndienu Oi with autism. 600 Blair Pa Suite 240, Williston. 1 day of each month, 7-9 1 Lynn, 802-660-7240, or vi http://www.AutismSuppc corn for more info. ARE YOU A CLOSET SIN( you have a good voice made the dogs how[) but a of fainting in public while ing? Join a group to supp, and perform in an intimate 802-893-1819. BRAIN INJURY ASSQCIAI VERMONT: Montpelier support group meets first a Thursday of the month at tartan Church "ramp entrap 1:30-2:30 p.m. Call helplit 877-856-1772.. BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIAT VERMONT: Montpelier even Port group meets the first of each month at Vermont tion and Advocacy, 141 h suite 7 in conference room 6-8 p.m. Call our. helplim 877-856-1772. BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIAT VERMONT. St. Albans even' port group meets the secoi day of each month at Not ern Medical Center, 133 Street from 6:30-8:30 p.m. helpline at 1-877-856-177, BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIAT. VERMONT: Bennington day group meets the first Frida, month at Second Congre! Church, Hillside Street fn p.m. Call helpline at 14 1772. OCD SUPPORT GROUP/TI GROUP: Come share your ence, get support from the have been there, learn ab: sessive Compulsive Disord how to reduce its symptom: apist facilitated. Weekly mE 802-343-8114. NW VT GAY AND LESBIA ter and Adoptive Parent ! Group: 6-8 p.m. The third TI of each month, starting Oct, through May, 2006. Casey Services, 46 Main St., Wino( This week's puzzle answers. Puzzles on page 47a. U B BE U BE: on 0 0 Ban H Bug CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMEN'I' OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURIANO TON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 2, 2006 Scott Homsted Krebs & Lansing 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Re: 472 Meadowland Drive Dear Mr. Homsted: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, November 7, 2006 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, 1 Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Lot 1 Munsm Earth Momq Corp. Scott & Roberto PMnhgtm Vol 209 P.-TM E,V", Lot 7 stet. MTC h. Es. SNN�t,,1_�� - I- '77m"='jJ8i9' Mv. M JJ1.05 4 � Mv. M JJP B.6 Mv. out .lT0B1 Er. SMN /7 R,in ry N B-/nv. M=JJ2.J" SGx9a' B' Mv. i_U2.02" e[MN OOeeWebbr s B' /nv. out=JJJ.96" _ - - _ _ - - - - - I� ss9�-• �.Xf7."'.".._... sewer stub ,..... — . I /-.. .,, � � \ � `, '^ S ION, i 11t .......--.— i /"""'.-' \ Honer & Marie Dubas Vol 179 P. 126 / CLASS // I I 1 I / I I Existing Pond I I I 1 p J J CLASS // Wet/ands Refer to Cmd/tkna✓ I/— Deten ootim No. 2001-J98 doted 1111/02 I r oddith al 47f matlan. No new disturbance of pass li weamds or "Mond buffer Proposed. �MMsarM Oneeey 20' pOaYebbr OeOenent oubegr sf ohn N IwbbrNe Lot J Summer- /ce JW't ✓ ture l d J87 P. 4J9 Notes: /. Onw &not o baunalry —y P q-,ty Ow w.- en Nvn a ptan rBW *MfiQ~MW 64ehw Awk - SiddM4kn pot' by rr W a—dth9 EN*ab- stet 24 1994 ncaubd h lbhme J% Asge M h &. ONy of S-0 ewJhgtan Land /phconit Location kap Owner & Applicant Information: 09rien Mttadodmdz L[C P.O. Sox 2184 oC�` South BurM gton, l? 0540J Areas. rota area - B00 acres (3444BO sq. ft) So n Oj(� Zoning.,V V Mal/stria and Open Saxe Zmhq District �iy��{O^ Lot Commas ! ./ Oa[ of NA Poremwrf 0 et ar N A 54OW If. l4p.A .R7f Porsnn R(�1? ef. t3te A TOM b Wave 1w .>eM1i BOe' Parking, 4a OOO sq,R. Nbrohouse/Distrllfutian/Contractor e 1 .;ooce/2,OA0 sq.R. = 20 spooces 14750 sq.R. Office space a .I5 spoces/4000 sq t?. - 66 spaces Ia OOO sq. R. Warehouse (mer2m47e) e) spoces/Z 000 sq.. ft. = 5 spores rota Spaces Requxed - 91 sexes Proposed Pa*hq Sboces - 100 (hd./5 handicapped) Legend - - SwwY cmtrd PPkrt - - — Prtp-ty LMe w Right of wby ---JJr Elistrrq ground — tour® Ex/srhg sewer manhae E isthq catch bosh .e E,Wmg sewer /he - - - En}rkrg enter /Me DQ E 'sN,y, hJsB'onl /water who -•—•-- E'stmg 1 ce rvv-v-rv� Extstkrq wood hhe ----- 334------ New Nnished grad fl 4 New /ummoirc � •—� New contnuous sat fence t—G- New co t—Mron /knit f cing O" 20' IO' 80' 120' 160, 200' Bar SCo% I- = 40' September 19, 2" Augur 11200 JWy?7, 2006 ',' 2.; 2006 pwkMq gradMp, pare invert grade eemi/s, nonebopped access recessed curb, stone drip edge swh awh swn swh 9/19106 B/JO/LK 1/21//e�6 /2.i/O6 Date reWsed Oe—ip Mon Checked Dore Design 1A✓ Drawn fMP/SNH Site Plan Checked Seale 401 Meadow/ands Business Complex Date Mr 2006 Lot 2 Meadow/and industrial Pork Project 05146 472 Meodowfmd DrIm South Burlhgtm, 1,1ommt ,1",&S & G4NSIN67 Cons►slAng Engineers, Inc. IB4 &ain Spree# Colchester, Permont &"-M , SOU"I H BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 January 18, 2007 Scott Homsted Krebs & Lansing 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Re: DRB Minutes Dear Mr. Homsted: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved minutes from the December 5, 2006 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy Mc onough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. / M 0 Q2►c� n -file SOUTH BLLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REV(( ,W BOARD 7 NOVEMBER 2006 5. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-06-87 of Gary & Diane Provost to subdivide a 2.68 acre lot developed with a single family dwelling into three lots of 1.18 acres (lot #1), .90 acres (lot #2), and .60 acres (lot #3),1925 Dorset Street: Mr. Young said there is an existing house on the lot. The applicants want to subdivide to add 2 more houses. They will use city utilities and will extend the water line on Dorset St. The City Engineer has asked that the drive be paved. Mr. Young said the applicant would like it to remain gravel. Mr. Belair said he talked with the Fire Chief who wasn't aware the drive was gravel. There is a requirement for private roads to be paved. Mr. Young said the applicant will agree to pave the shared road. The drives to the houses will _ remaingravel. Mr. Belair noted that the Rec Path Committee has said there is no reason to extend the sidewalk across the front as the Rec Path is on the other side of the street. Board members had no problem with that. Mr. Belair noted the Chief is satisfied with how the turn -around is now drawn. The draft motion was amended as follows: Stipulation 3b was modified to require the applicant to comply with the City Engineer's requests #3-8. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-06-87 of Gary & Diane Provost subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 06.Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-06-88 of O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC, to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 50,000 sq. ft. building. The amendment consists of adding 10,000 sq, ft. of mezzanine space, for a total of 60,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area, 472 Meadowland Drive: Mr. Belair noted the addition of some parking spaces to cover the number of employees. There are no site changes, just the additional mezzanine space. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-06-88 of O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. -2- SOUTH BL'..LINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVr,. W BOARD 7 NOVEMBER 2006 Mr. Dinklage asked why Mr. Belair did not issue a notice of violation. Mr. Belair said he was asked for a CO. He checked whether the site was in compliance. It wasn't. So he did not issue the CO. Mr. Belair added that he has told the applicant that he has since visited the site and the violations have been remedied. He would now issue a CO if they would apply for one. Mr. Sperry, representing the appellant, reviewed the history of the approval to do the work. When the work was completed, they applied for a CO in August. They were told there was still storage behind the building so they withdrew the application. They later made sure the area behind the building was clear and again applied for a CO. Mr. Sperry showed a picture of the site taken on 19 September, the day they applied for the CO. The area was clean. Mr. Belair said he has a 5-day window to view the property, and when he did, there was a _pallet outside and the truck in the fire lane____ Mr. Sperry asked for the Board's help in getting them out of this cycle. They are reluctant to apply again in case this tenant again puts stuff outside. Mr. Belair said it is more than likely an application for a CO will now be approved. Mr. Dinklage said the Board has to move carefully on this as there is a history with this property. Members felt they wanted advice from the city attorney and suggested closing the hearing and meeting with the attorney prior to making a decision. Ms. Quimby moved to close the public hearing. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Belair suggested a deliberative session prior to the next DRB meeting. Mr. Knudsen rejoined the Board. 9. Continued Public hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-06-54 of John Illick for a planned unit development to subdivide a 177.2 acre parcel into 16 lots ranging in size from 3.98 acres to 29.46 acres, Community Drive: Mr. Belair said the applicant has asked for a continuance. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Preliminary Plat application #SD-06-54 of John Illick until 21 November 2006. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Continued sketch plan application #SD-06-69 of R. L. Vallee to amend a previously approved plan for a service station with gas sales (8 fueling positions). The amendment consists of. 1) converting 1234 sq. ft. to short- order restaurant, and 2) converting 1079 sq. ft. to convenience store use, 811 Williston Road: -4- 7 KREBS & LANSINP CONSULTING ENGINEER INC. 164 Main Street COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 (802) 878-0375 FAX (802) 878-9618 TO YIy �('j�71 L or - WE ARE SENDING YOU hed ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ LJu��� OLJ � D d LJV�LJVLJ� LJ ��LJ DATE JOB NO. ATTENTION RE: P it �V ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 Yt_ ,, THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For prpval ❑ For your use requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS Approved as submitted J Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: ff enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 8, 2oo6 Scott Homsted Krebs & Lansing 164 Main Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 472 Meadowland Drive Dear Mr. Homsted: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on November 7, 20o6 (effective 11/7/o6). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 18o days (must be submitted & recorded by MaY, 2007) of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, PCa- I m m Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT 7005 3110 0004 4484 6944 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Agenda # 6 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM. Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner 0 DA TE: October 31, 2006 CC: O'Brien Meadowlands LLC, Applicant Final Plat Plan Application #SD-06-88 Meeting Date: November 7, 2006 Final plat application #SD-06-88 of O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 50,000 sq. ft. building. The amendment consists of adding 10,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine space, for a total of 60,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area, 472 Meadowland Drive. All proposed additions will be internal to the building; therefore there are no changes to the footprint of the building or related dimensional requirements. According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the 60,000 square feet of contractor or building trade facility will require 30 spaces plus one space for each employee. The number of employees is unknown at this time. As the applicant is proposing 100 parking spaces, the site shall be limited to 70 employees. 1. The site shall be limited to no more than 70 employees. ffrit any time the collective businesses on the site employ more than that number, the applicant shall either provide additional parking or return to the Board to request a parking waiver. According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7"' Edition, the 60,000 square feet of contractor or building trade facility is estimated to generate 26.4 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The applicant has estimated 50 PM peak hour trip ends and was granted approval for such at the original final plat approval. Staff finds this acceptable. Staff finds no issues with this proposal and recommends that the Development Review Board approve Final Plat Plan Application #SD-06-88. KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEEk' INC. 164 Main Street COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 (802) 878-0375 FAX (802) 878-9618 TO WE ARE SENDING YOU -E3"-Attached ❑ Under separate cover via _ ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order DATE 111:71 JOB NO. 0. ATTENTI N RE: r- the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION l6=9 I ILI oY .vr� n THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For�p{�rpval ❑JFor your use requested For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections COPY TO 1PAVaCaC, 0 "/y� ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US SIGNED: c-" If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 October 3, 2006 Fax (802) 878-9618 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Meadowlands Business Complex 472 Meadowland Drive - South Burlington, Vermont Final Plat Application #SD-06-34 Dear Ray, Please find attached a revised plan and application to amend Final Plat Application #SD-06-34, for the Meadowlands Business Complex. The purpose of the application is to add 10,000 square feet of mezzanine space (1,000 square feet/unit) inside the building. Due to this additional area the proposed use will change to up to 18,750 square feet for general office and 41,250 square feet for other approved activities such a Contractor or building trade facility, Light Manufacturing, Manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components, Printing & binding production facilities, and/or Research facility or laboratory. The amount of vehicle trip ends and parking spaces proposed have been revised to be in accordance with the proposed amounts of each use. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments regarding this matter. Sincerely, 144 Scott Homsted swh enclosure cc: Patrick O'Brien 05146-ray3.wpd Permit Number SD- - " b CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 (802) 658-5000 (p) (802) 658-5002 (f) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Same as above 4) CONTACT PERSON (Person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Scott Homsted Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, Vermont 05446 (802) 878-0375 (p) (802) 878-9618 (t) 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 472 Meadowland Drive South Burlington, Vermont 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1705-00107 C 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use There is no existing use on this property. b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) The purpose of this amendment is to add 10,000 s.f. of mezzanine space in the building. This will bring anticipated use of property up to 18,750 s.f. for general office and 41,250 s.f. for other approved activities including: Contractor or building trade facility Light Manufacturing Manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components Printing & binding production facilities Research facility or laboratory c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) The proposed building is 50,000 Square Feet d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) The proposed building will be single story with mezzanine. 10,000 s.f. of mezzanine area is proposed. The elevation for the building will be 35 feet. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not Applicable f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) No change proposed. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Not Applicable h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc._ Not Applicable 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? Yes b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or there associated 50' buffers? No. c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by 2 C the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: 1. a site specific wetlands delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel 8.0 acres/ 848,480 s.L (acres/sq.ft.) b) Building Coverage: Existing 0 square feet 0 % Proposed 50,000 square feet 14.3 % c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 square feet 0 % Proposed 133,808 square feet 38.4 % d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing 0 square feet 0 % Proposed 5,379 square feet 29.9 % 10) AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 233,500 sq.ft.* *Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 11) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking Not Applicable 12) COST ESTIMATES No Change proposed. a) Building (including interior renovations) $ b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) _ C 13) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) 485 trip ends/day b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) 66 a.m. peak hour trip ends c) P.M. peak hour for entire property (in and out) 68 p.m. peak hour trip ends 14) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 15) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday 16) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Fall 2006 17) ABUTTING LANDOWNERS - please list abutting landowners, including those across any streets. You may attach a separate sheet. The owners of record are provided on a separate attached sheet. 18) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I V x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). 0 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the bes Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION I have reviewed this final plat application and find it to be: ompl Inc lete i r14 ec r K Planning & Zoning or Designee l3ate 5 CITY I,ERK'S OFFICE deceived Al 20tpageT4Q at., Recorded sn Vol. j 4 Y So. Buriinglon Lan Re rds stet: J.D--Q EASEMENT RELOCATION AGREEMENT nonna S- KinAle. Cikv Clw� This Easement Relocation Agreement (this "Agreement") is by and between O'BRIEN MEADOWLANDS, LLC, a Vermont limited liability company with a place of business in South Burlington, Vermont ("O'Brien") and the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality with a place of business in Chittenden County, Vermont (the "City"). Background 1. O'Brien is the owner of a commercial property consisting of Lot 2 of Meadowland Business Park as shown on a plat entitled: "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, VT., Subdivision Plat," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Dated April 23, 1996, last revised August 27, 1996 and recorded in Map Volume 386 at Page 98 (Map Slide 300) of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plat"). Reference is made to the Warranty Deed from Munson Earth Moving Corporation to O'Brien dated August 18, 2006 and recorded on August 18, 2006 in Volume at Page �6 / of the City of South Burlington Land Records. 2. In connection with the development of Meadowland Business Park, Summer Ice Joint Venture, the developer of the business park, conveyed a recreation path easement to the City by Easement Deed dated October 23, 1996 and recorded in Volume 401 at Page 347 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Existing Right of Way"). 3. In connection with the development of Lot 2 of Meadowland Business Park, O'Brien has determined that a portion of the Existing Right of Way runs through a wetland and, as result, O'Brien and the City have agreed to modify the location of the recreation path easement to avoid the wetland. The location of the modified recreation path is shown as the "Relocated 20' Pedestrian Easement" on a plan entitled: "Site Plan, Meadowlands Business Complex, Lot 2 Meadowland Industrial Park, 472 Meadowland Drive, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated May 3, 2006, last revised May 23, 2006, and recorded in Map Volume 481 at Page 4 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Site Plan"). 4. The City enters into this Agreement with O'Brien to release its right, title and interest in and to the affected portion of the Existing Right of Way in exchange for a new easement in the location depicted as the "Relocated 20' Pedestrian Easement" on the Site Plan (hereinafter the "Relocated Right of Way"). NOW, THEREFORE, In consideration of Ten and More Dollars and in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements herein set forth, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, O'Brien and the City hereby agree and confirm as follows: Section 1. Release of Existing Right of Way. The City, by these presents, does freely remise, release, and forever quitclaim unto O'Brien and its successors and assigns forever, all of its right, title and interest in and to the portion of the Existing Right of Way depicted on the Site Plan with a notation reading "Relocate Existing 20' Pedestrian Easement Outside of Class H Wetlands." To have and to hold, all right and title in and to said easement, with the appurtenances thereof, to the said O'Brien and its successors and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever. Section 2. Grant of Relocated Right of Way. Subject to the condition set forth below, O'Brien by these presents, gives, grants, bargains, sells and conveys to the City and its successors and assigns, a pedestrian easement over the strip of land designated as "Relocated 20' Pedestrian Easement" on the Site Plan, which easement shall be conveyed subject to and benefitted by the terms and conditions set forth in the original Easement Deed referenced above in Background Section 2, as if such Relocated Right of Way had been part of the original description of the easement area described in the Easement Deed. To have and to hold, all right and title in and to said easement, with the appurtenances thereof, to the said City and its successors and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever; and O'Brien, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the City, and its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, O'Brien is the sole owner of the above -described premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in the manner aforesaid, that the above -described premises are free from every encumbrance, except as aforementioned; and it hereby engages to warrant and defend the same against all lawful claims whatsoever. The above grant of the Relocated Right of Way shall be effective upon the execution of this Agreement by both parties and recording of this Agreement in the City of South Burlington Land Records. Section 3. Amendments. No amendments or modification to this Agreement or the location of the Relocated Right of Way shall be effective without a written Amendment to this Agreement executed by O'Brien and the City or their respective heirs, successors and assigns, and recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records. Section 4. Rights of Successors and Assigns. This Agreement creates mutual benefits and servitudes running with the land. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of O'Brien and the City and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. Section 5. Entire Agreement. This Agreement embodies the entire agreement and understanding between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes any prior agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, between the parties, except as herein set forth. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed or caused this Agreement to be executed as of the ;�- `i day of v �� f , 2006. IN PRESENCE OF: O'B OWLANDS, LLC 7 t By: Witness Duly Authorized Agent ess -2- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By: C JQ?=A Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. / On this ;� `i --day of t , 2006, personally appeared Duly Authorized Agent of O;BAIEN MEADOWLANDS, LLC, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and he/she acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of O'BRIEN MEADOWLANDS, LLC. Before me, OAv� -D ' - NotAy Public Notary commission issued in Chittenden County My commission expires: 2/10/07 STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. 5-r On this a day of , 2006, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of the C TY OF SOUTH BURLINGTii to n t be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and he acknowledged this in imsi ed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH T N. issidp expires: 2/1 <271050.2/5c5@011.WPD/> - 3 - I KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. July 26, 2006 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Meadowlands Business Complex 472 Meadowland Drive - South Burlington, Vermont Dear Ray, 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 Fax (802) 878-9618 Please find attached plans for the above referenced project that have been revised to comply with the conditions of the approval of Final Plat Application #SD-06-34. Specifically, we have revised the following: A. The Landscape Plan (Sheet 4) has been revised to comply with the requests of the City Arborist. The three blue spruce shown in the northwest corner of the site have been changed to Austrian pine. B. The northeast snow storage area has been revised to avoid conflict with the recreation path easement. C. The plans have been revised to show the utility cabinets as effectively screened. Eastern white cedar will be used to screen the cabinets. D. The detail for curb (Sheet D-2) has been revised to show a 7" curb reveal. E. The plans have been revised to show the recreation path easement relocated further to the west to avoid the Class III wetland. We are also enclosing a recordable mylar of the Site Plan (Sheet 1) and the $11 filing fee. Thank you for your assistance with this project. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments regarding Meadowlands Business Complex. Sincerely, —i-4� Scott Homsted swh enclosure cc: Patrick O'Brien 05146-ray3.wpd State of Vermont LAND USE PERMIT AMENDMENT CASE NO 4C 1005-5 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED APPLICANT O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001 - 6092 (Act 250) ADDRESS P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 and Munson Earth Moving Corp. 2;Colton Place Williston, Vermont 05495 District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues Land Use Permit Amendment 4C1005-5, pursuant to the authority vested in it by 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 651, Page 157, of the land records of the City of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Munson Earth Moving Corp., Co-Permittees as Grantees. This permit specifically authorizes the Permittees to construct a 50,000 s.f. industrial/commercial building with ten individual units to be used as general offices (20%) and industrial/commercial .activities (80%). The Project will be called Meadowlands Business Complex and is located on Lot #2 of Meadowlands Industrial Park in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. The project is subject to Act 250 jurisdiction because the project is a material or substantial change to a development over which the Commission has jurisdiction and thus constitutes "development" pursuant to Act 250 Rule 2(A). Accordingly, a land use permit amendment is required pursuant to Act 250 Rule 34. The Permittees, and their assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete, operate and maintain the project as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: All conditions of Land Use Permit #4C 1005 and amendments are in full force and effect except as amended herein. 2. By acceptance of this permit, the Permittees agree to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations and with this permit. The project shall be completed, operated and maintained in accordance with the plans and exhibits on file with the District Environmental Commission and the conditions of this permit. 4. The approved plans are: Sheet 1 - "Site Plan," dated May 3, 2006, last revision May 23, 2006; Sheet 2 - "Utility Plan," dated May 3, 2006, last revision May 23, 2006; Sheet 3 - "Lighting Plan," dated May 3, 2006; Land Use Permit #4C1005-5 Page 2 of 5 Sheet 4 - "Landscape Plan," dated May 3, 2006, last revision May 23, 2006; Sheet D-1 - "Details," dated May 3, 2006; Sheet D-2 - "Details," dated May 3, 2006; Sheet D-3 - "Details," dated May 3, 2006; and Elevations and Typical Entrance Plan, dated May 10, 2006. A copy of this permit and approved plans shall be on the site at all times throughout the construction process. No changes shall be made in the design or use of this project without the written approval of the District Coordinator or the Commission, whichever is appropriate under the Environmental Board Rules. Pursuant to Act 250 Rule 51(G), the permit application and material representations relied upon during the review and issuance of this permit by the District Commission shall provide the basis for determining future substantial and material changes to the approved project and for initiating enforcement actions. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed, operated and maintained in accordance with the terms of the permit, as provided by 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092 and the Act 250 Rules. 9. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the Permittees confirm and agree that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding upon and enforceable against the Permittees and all assigns and successors in interest. 10. The project is approved for the following maximum impacts: 90 - vehicle parking spaces; 945 - gallons per day of wastewater; 945 - gallons per day of water; 389 - vehicle trips per day; 53 - AM peak hour vehicle trips; and 55 - PM peak hour vehicle trips. 11. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the following Agency of Natural Resources Permits: • Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit #WW-4-2638 issued on August 10, 2006 by the Wastewater Management Division; • Final Discharge Permit #1-1269 issued on December 30, 1996 by the Water Quality Division (Exhibit #13); and • Individual Discharge Permit #4290-IlVDC (NPDES Number: VTS000047) issued on July 26, 2006 by the Water Quality Division Land Use Permit #4C1005-5 Page 3 of 5 Any subsequent nonmaterial changes to these permits shall be automatically incorporated herein upon issuance by the Agency of Natural Resources. Subsequent amendments involving material changes to the Act 250 permit shall not be constructed prior to review and approval of the District Coordinator or the District Commission under applicable Act 250 Rules. 12. The Permittees shall apply and maintain calcium chloride and/or water on all roadways or disturbed areas within the project during construction and until pavement and/or vegetation is fully established to control dust. 13. The building approved herein is not approved for any manufacturing use or the on -site disposal of any process wastes. The Permittees shall apply and receive amended approval from the District Commission for any change in the use of the buildings which involves the storage or handling of anv regulated substances or the generation of hazardous wastes. 14. The Permittees and all subsequent owners or lessees shall install and maintain only low -flow plumbing fixtures in any buildings. Any failed water conservation measures shall be promptly replaced with products of equal or better performance. 15. The Permittees shall comply with Exhibits #5 and 42 (Schedule B; and Details Plan) for erosion control. The Permittees shall prevent the transport of any sediment beyond that area necessary for construction approved herein. All erosion control devices shall be periodically cleaned, replaced and maintained until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas. The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review erosion control and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to erosion control as it deems necessary. 16. All mulch, hay bales, siltation dams, water bars and other temporary devices shall be installed immediately upon grading and shall be maintained until all roads are permanently surfaced and all permanent vegetation is established on all slopes and disturbed areas. Hay bales shall be incorporated four inches into the soil and equipped with filter fence on the upstream side, butted together and all joints filled with loose hay. Topsoil stockpiles shall have the exposed earth completely mulched and have siltation checks around the base. 17. Grading shall be phased so that all exposed earth is mulched and water bars are in place at the end of each construction day. 18. All disturbed areas of the site shall be stabilized, seeded and mulched immediately upon completion of final grading. All disturbed areas not involved in winter construction shall be mulched and seeded before October 1. Between the periods of October 1 to April 15, all earth disturbing work shall conform with the "Winter Construction" standards and specifications of the Vermont Handbook for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control on Construction Sites (2003). 19. Prior to construction of the approved work, the Permittees shall complete the following: a) construction limits shall be clearly delineated with flagging or snowfencing; b) diversion ditches shall be placed on the uphill limits of the construction area; and c) temporary siltation controls shall be placed on the downhill limits of the construction. Immediately following the above, the permanent drainage system and/or roads shall be installed after which normal construction can begin. Land Use Permit #4C1005-5 Page 4 of 5 20. To the greatest extent practicable, construction debris, including asphalt, concrete, brick, stone, scrap metal, carpet, clean wood and paper products, glass and most plastics, shall be recycled in accordance with the recommendations set forth in the Vermont Construction Site Reuse and Recycling Directory published in April, 1998 by the Agency of Natural Resources. 21. A copy of the approved erosion control plan shall be on the site at all times during construction. 22. In addition to conformance with all erosion control conditions, the Permittees shall not cause, permit or allow the discharge of waste material into any surface waters. Compliance with the requirements of this condition does not absolve the Permittees from compliance with 10 V.S.A. §§ 1250-1284, Vermont's Water Pollution Control Law. 23. The Permittees shall maintain a 50-foot undisturbed, naturally vegetated buffer strip between all watercourses on the project site and any disturbed areas. 24. All stumps shall be disposed of on -site above the seasonal high water table or at a State approved landfill so as to prevent groundwater pollution. 25. The Permittees and all assigns and successors in interest shall continually maintain the landscaping as approved in Exhibit #39 (Landscape Plan) by replacing any dead or diseased plantings within the season or as soon as possible after the ground thaws, whichever is sooner. 26. Prior to any site work, the Permittees shall install and maintain temporary fencing along the tree line to be retained as depicted on Exhibit #39. 27. The installation of exterior light fixtures is limited to those approved in Exhibit #38 (Lighting Plan), and shall be mounted no higher than (20) feet above grade level. All exterior lighting shall be installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources and reflector surfaces from view beyond the perimeter of the area to be illuminated. 28. The installation of exterior signage is limited to that approved in Exhibit #42 (Details Plan). The Permittees shall not erect additional exterior signage without first obtaining approval from the District Commission. Signage includes banners, flags, and other advertising displays, excepting temporary real estate marketing signs. 29. Energy design and construction shall comply with the 2001 Vermont Guidelines for Energy Efficient Commercial Construction and shall further include custom energy measures referenced in interagency comments by the Department of Public Service if found cost-effective on a life - cycle -cost basis. Any design or equipment features that do not comply with the 2001 Vermont Guidelines, or any custom measures not installed, shall be brought promptly to the attention of the Department of Public Service for comment, and to the District Commission for approval, prior to construction. Exhibit #44 (ANR Entry of Appearance, dated June 27, 2006). 30. The installation and/or use of electric resistance space heat is specifically prohibited without the prior written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 31. At the completion of the project, and prior to the occupancy of the building, the Permittees shall certify by affidavit that the site improvements have been constructed in accordance with this permit pursuant to Rule 32(A). Land Use Permit #4C 1005-5 Page 5 of 5 32. Each prospective purchaser of any lots shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan, Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit, and the Land Use Permit Amendment before any written contract of sale is executed. 33. No further subdivision, alteration, and/or development of any parcel of land approved herein shall be permitted without the written approval of the District Commission. 34. The Permittees shall reference the requirements and conditions imposed by Land Use Permit #4C 1005-5 in all deeds of conveyance and leases. 35. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6O9O(b) this permit amendment is hereby issued for an indefinite term, as long as there is compliance with the conditions herein. Notwithstanding any other provision herein, this permit shall expire three years from the date of issuance if the Permittees have not commenced construction and made substantial progress toward completion within the three year period in accordance with 10 V.S.A. § 6O91(b). 36. Failure to comply with all of the above conditions may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6O9O(c). Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 1' day of August, 2006. - By: Stephanie ft. Monaghan, District Co dinator As authorized by: Kate Purcell, Acting Chair in this matter District #4 Environmental Commission Members participating in this decision: Gene Richards Chuck Dunham Any party may file a motion to alter with the District Commission within 15 days from the date of this decision, pursuant to Act 250 Rule 31(A). Decisions on minor applications may be appealed only if a hearing was held by the District Commission. Please note that there are certain limitations on the right to appeal. See 10 V.S.A. § 8504(k). Any appeal of this decision may be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of issuance, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $225.00, payable to the State of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must include all information required by Rule 5(b)(3) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings (VRECP). The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the VRECP. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available online at www.vermontiudiciary.org. As of February 14, 2005, the address for the Environmental Court is: Environmental Court, 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641-8701. (Tel. # 802-828-1660) W:\Act250\D1ST4\PROJECTS\4C 1005\4C 1005-5.pmt.wpd EXHIBIT LIST FOR i E DATE X R H E I C B E I I T V N O. �PPL: E N T E R E D B Y CCATION #4C1005-5 Page 1 A = Applicant T = Town EC = Environmental Conservation RPC = Regional Planning Commission ANR = Agency of Natural Resources AOT = Agency of Transportation DPS = Department of Public Services VDH = Vermont Department of Health DP = Division for Historic Preservation WMD = Wastewater Management Division Nature of Exhibit and Date Entered 1 06/06/06 Cover Letter by Krebs & Lansing (06/05/06) 2 46Act 250 Application Cover Sheets 3 64Schedule A - Fee Information 4 ". Site Work Cost Estimate 5 Schedule B - Response to the 10 Criteria & Subcriteria /— 6 Schedule E - Adjoiner Information 7 Schedule F - Certification of Service & Notice of Application 8 Amended Air Pollution Control Permit & Amendments 9. South Burlington Sewer & Water Allocations 10 Ability to Serve Letter by South Burl Water Dept (05/26/06) 11 Wastewater System & Potable Water Supply Permit Application 12 Construction Permit Application to Construct a Water Line 13 Padraic Monks'Approval e-mail (03/06/06) & Discharge Permit #1-1269 14 Construction Waste Reduction Plan 15 Conditional Use Determination #2001-398 16 Individual Discharge Permit for Stormwater Runoff 17 Erosion Prevention & Sediment Control Plan 18 Figure 1: Location Map (05/19/06) 19 Plan: Existing Conditions Plan, X-1 (05/03/06) 20 Plan: Grading & Erosion & Sediment Plan, EC-1 (05/12/06) W:\Act250\ADMIN\EXHIBlIN4CIO05-5.wpd.bc EXHIBIT LIST FOR APPLICATION #4C1005-5 Page 2 21 64Detail A: Index of Erosion Control Measures (05/19/06) 22 Detail B: Soil Erosion & Sediment Control (05/19/06) 23 Detail C: Crushed Stone Sediment Dike (05/19/06) 24 Detail D: Erosion Control Blanket (05/19/06) 25 Detail E: Silt Fence/E.C. Barrier/Const. Barrier 26 Detail F: Temporary Const. Road/Const. Entrance (5/19/06) 27 _ Detail G: Catch Basin Inlet Protection (05/19/06) 28 Detail H: Reinforced Erosion Control Protection Channel Installation (05/19/06) 29 Detail I: Reinforced Erosion Control Protection Slope Installation (05/19/06) 30 Traffic Impact Assessment 31 Ability to Serve Letters: VT Gas (05/22/06); Verizon (05/19/06) & Green Mountain Power Corp (06/01/06) 32 Portions of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan (03/09/06) 33 Portions of 2001 Chittenden County Regional Plan 34 Municipal Impact Questionnaire 35 Previous Land Use Permits 36 Plan: Site Plan, #1 (Rev 05/23/06) 37 Plan: Utility Plan, #2 (Rev 05/23/06) 38 Plan: Lighting Plan, #3 (05/03/06) 39 Plan: Landscape Plan, #4 (Rev 05/23/06) 40 Plan: Details, #D-1 (05/03/06) 41 Plan: Details, #D-2 (05/03/06) 42 Plan: Details, #D-3 (05/03/06) 43 Plan: Elevations (05/10/06) 44 6/30/06 ANR Entry of Appearance Comments (6/27/06) W:\Act250\ADMIN\EXHIBIT\4CIO05-5.wpd.bc EXHIBIT LIST -FOR APPLICATION #4C1005-5 Page 3 45 7/31/06 Letter by Water Quality Division re Construction Individual Discharge Permit No. 4290-INDC Issued 7/26/06) 46 8/10/06 44Wastewater System & Potable Water Supply Permit WW-4-2638 Issued 8/10/06 W:\Act250\ADMIN\EXHIBIT\4CIO05-5.wpd.bc CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE{ I hereby certify on this I day of August, 2006, a copy of the foregoing ACT 250 LAND USE PERMIT #4C1005-5, was sent first class mail, postage prepaid to: i !PARTIES: (O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. PO Box 2184 !South Burlington, VT 05403 i 'Munson Earth Moving Corp. 129 Colton Place (Williston, VT 05495 I Scott W. Homsted, P.E. Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 I Donna Kinville, City Clerk ;Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street I South Burlington, VT 05495 1Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 130 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 ii Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney ;Agency of Natural Resources 1103 South Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor !,Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 {FOR YOUR INFORMATION I; ,District #4 Environmental Commission Kate Purcell, Acting Chair/Gene Richards/Chuck Dunham 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 ;James B. McCarthy, Engineering Services Ytrans - One National Life Drive, Drawer 33 ;Montpelier, VT 05633 John Becker/Vt. Dept. of Public Service 112 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this' 1 day of August, 2006. C A 4 1' 1% I;AIIAIA" : Act250\ADMIN\CS\4C1005-5.wpd.cc Mffst MLT U15 Mmd Natural Resources Board Technician 879-5660 State of Vermont "w WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT X LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules, Cliapter 1, Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective January 1, 2005 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective April 25, 2005 Case Number: WW-4-2638 PIN: EJ96-0381.02 Landowner: Munson Earth Moving Corporation 29 Colton Place Williston VT 05495 This permit affects property referenced in deeds recorded in Book 651 Page 157 of the Land Records in South Burlington, Vermont. This project, consisting of construct a 50,000 square foot commercial building with a maximum of 70 employees on Lot #2 served by municipal water and wastewater services previously approved by Permit #EC-4-2004 located at 472 Meadowland Drive in the City of South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. This does not constitute approval under Act 250 case number 40005. GENERAL 1. This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Supply Division — telephone (802) 241-3400, the Department Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety— telephone Williston Regional Office (802) 879-2300, and local officials prior to proceeding with this project. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans that have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division: Project: 05146, Sheet 1 "Site Plan" dated May 3, 2006 last revised May 23, 2006; Sheet 2 "Utility Plan" dated May 3, 2006 last revised May 23, 2006; Sheet D-1 "Details" dated May 3, 20061; and Sheet D-3 "Details" dated May 3, 2006 prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 3. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans in a manner that would change or affect the exterior water supply or wastewater disposal systems, building location, or, the approved use of the building, without prior review and written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 4. The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (30) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit WW-4-2638 Munson Earth Moving Corporation Page 2 5. All conditions set forth in Permit #EC-4-2004 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. 6. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations. A copy of the approved plans and this permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction, and upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. WATER SUPPLY & WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 7. No permit issued by the Secretary shall be valid for a substantially completed potable water supply and wastewater system until the Secretary receives a certification from a designer or the installer, signed and dated, that states: "I hereby certify that, in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment, the installation -related information submitted is true and correct and the potable water supply and wastewater system were installed in accordance with the permitted design and all permit conditions, were inspected, were properly tested, and have successfully met those performance tests." This shall include the water service and sanitary sewer lines to the structure. 8. The project is approved for water supply and wastewater disposal by connection to the municipal water and wastewater systems as depicted on the approved plans. The project is approved for a maximum of 945 gallons of water and wastewater per day. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no other method or location of obtaining potable water or wastewater disposal without prior review and approval. 9. The water main extension is approved provided the water main extension is constructed in strict accordance with the Agency of Natural Resources, Water Supply Division's "Public Water System Permit to Construct " Project #C-1847-06.0 WSID #5091 to Munson Earth Moving Corporation dated July 31, 2006. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont on August 10, 2006. Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By �r� �+'�. Ernest Christianson Regional Engineer C For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission & Select Board Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. Water Supply Division Act 250 District Environmental Commission Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety A Project Name B Effective Date C D E F G H I J K L Impact Fee Calculation for New Non -Residential Construction Type of use Type of construction Value of construction per square foot from Appendix 1 Total square feet of new construction q74 GkzJ' dvv Total value of new construction ( 61 CA-" E x F Above in units of$1,000 G / 1000 Existing land value Grand list Above in units of$1,000p I / 1000 Total value of site and improvements after construction G + I Above in units of$1,000 c% K / 1000 — 1-0 to, ROAD IMPACT FEE M Base road impact fee per VTE N Estimated PM peak hour VTEs O Base road impact fee P Credit per $1,000 (Table RD-5) for past payments Q Credit for past payments R Credit per $1,000 (Table RD-6) for future payments S Credit for future payments T Total road impact fee $144.56 .S,5r— SD M x N Y�� J x P ./0 Z,> L x R q O-Q-S FIRE PROTECTION FEE Estimated post construction value of structure and contents �. U in units of $1,000 ��j�. S H x 1.875 V Base fire protection impact fee a aoa,� $0.87 x U W Credit per $1,000 of land value (J) for past tax payments FP4) (• /� (Table From FP4 �l X Total credit applicable to project for past tax payments T ► _ W x J Post -construction value of structure and land excluding Y contents G + I Z Above in units of $1,000 �(p Y/ 1,000 Credit per $1,000 of post -construction value for future tax AA pmts (Table FP-5) U From FP4 AB Total credit applicable to project for future tax payments (/`� c �V AA x Z AC Total fire protection impact fee y V - X - AB TOTAL ROAD AND FIRE IMPACT FEE Calculation sheets.xls SOUTH BURI,INGTON PLANNING & Z,ONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 July 20, 2006 Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Partnership PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: 472 Meadowland Drive Dear Mr. O'Brien: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved minutes from the June 6, 2006 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 6 JUNE 2006 7. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-06-30 & Final Plat Application #SD-06-31 of Super -Temp Wire & Cable, Inc., for a planned unit development consisting of a 35,000 sq. ft. manufacturing facility to be constructed in two phases, Phase I consisting of 30,000 sq. ft. and Phase II consisting of 5,000 sq. ft., 104 Bowdoin Street: Mr. Marshall showed the lot for this project. The site is restricted by a View Protection Zone, but there are no wetlands on the site. The applicant is requesting a height waiver for part of the building, but this will be within the limit imposed by the View Protection Zone. 27 parking spaces are being provided which represents a 25% waiver. There will be a limit to the number of employees. Stormwater treatment will be provided on site. Mr. Marshall showed the location of deciduous trees on the south side of the building. On the north side, there will be spruce and other evergreens for screening. Plantings will be removed from the rec path location and moved a few feet. A plan will be provided to show the new location. Mr. Dinklage noted that the FAA could override the Board's approval because of approach cone issues. Mr. Marshall said the applicant is aware of this. The motion was amended as follows: Stipulations #15 and 16 were deleted. A new Stipulation #15 was added to read: Pursuant to Section 3.07(F)(2) of the Land Development Regulations, the Board grants a five foot height waiver for a maximum height of 40 feet. Ms Quimby moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-06-30 and Final Plat Application #SD-06-31 of Super -Temp Wire & Cable, Inc., subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-06-33 and Final Plat Application #SD-06-34 of O'Brien Brothers Agency for a planned unit development to construct a 50,000 sq. ft. contractor or building trade facility, 472 Meadowland Drive: Mr. O'Brien identified the lot as the second one down on the right on Meadowland Drive. He then reviewed previously identified issues: 1. They have agreed to go with one access point across from the existing street. 2. The Fire Chief has requested a paved 20-foot wide lane on the far end of the building. This is now shown on the plan. -5- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 6 JUNE 2006 Mr. O'Brien then showed the bike path easement. They have agreed to take the easement out of the wetland and into the buffer. All changes will occur on this lot. Plantings will remain on the berm. Street trees have been added. The north and south elevations have been broken up with color changes. Mr. O'Brien said they will commit to constructing the building as shown on the elevations. Mr. Belair noted that a traffic review has determined that a light is not warranted at this time. Mr. Dickinson said they are not close to needing a light. Mr. Belair also noted that the buffer is to remain in its natural state. Mr. Dinklage called attention to restrictions on times of operation. Mr. Belair also noted that all tenants must be reviewed by staff so parking and/or traffic limits are not exceeded. Mr. Jaeger said as an abutter he is concerned with restrictions in a commercial area. He asked the Board to consider each case de novo. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Preliminary Plat #SD-06-33 and Final Plat #SD-06-34 of O'Brien Brothers Agency subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Birmingham seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Sketch Plan Application #SD-06-27 of Gary & Diane Provost to subdivide a 3.1 acre lot developed with a single family dwelling into three lots of 1.35 acres (lot #1), .99 acres (lot #2) and .68 acres (lot #3), 1925 Dorset St: Mr. Provost said they will put in a 20-foot private drive to serve three houses. Mr. Belair said more road right-of-way may be needed for snow storage, etc. Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to work with staff on provided building envelopes, setbacks, etc. 10. Sketch Plan Application #SD-06-28 of Leslie Williams for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) subdividing a 7.97 acre parcel developed with a single family dwelling into six lots ranging in size from 0.5 acres to 2.52 acres, 2) constructing two single-family dwellings in lot #4, 3) constructing four single-family dwellings on lot #5, and 4) constructing single family dwellings on each of lots 1, 2 and 3, for a total of nine additional dwelling units, 1630 Dorset St: Mr. Dickinson said this is a modified version of the play which got preliminary plat approval. Modifications are in line with new zoning regulations. The project will be CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 12, 2006 Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Partnership PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407-2184 Re: Proposed Tenants - 472 Meadowland Drive - Units #8 & 10 This is in response to your request of July 6, 2006 for two (2) tenants at 472 Meadowland Drive to occupy units #8 & 10. The proposed tenant for unit #8 is Vermont Courier, Inc. and for unit #10 is Herlook Enterprise, LLC. Both tenants would occupy 5,000 sq. ft. and both uses would be "manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials and components". Pursuant to Condition #21 of your 6/6/06 final plat approval, the above described tenants and uses are approved. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, hQt� julri Beth Hinds Director of Planning and Zoning �1? l State of N,ermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation 'Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD July 14, 2006 Munson Earth Moving Corp. 29 Colton Place Williston VT 05495 Subject WW-4-2638 Meadowlands Business Complex AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division Essex Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695 Telephone: (802) 879-5656 construct a 50,000 sqare foot commercial building on Lot #2 located at 472 Meadowland Drive in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Sir/Madam: I reviewed the application and technical information submitted for the above referenced project. Unfortunately, there were items that were not included or were insufficient and I was unable to determine if this project meets the minimum standards of the Environmental Protection Rules. Please provide the following information: 1. Please provide the approval for the water line extension from the Water Supply Division. Please respond within thirty, (30) days from the date of this letter. Re -submittals that are incomplete, or made after thirty days may result in the denial of the project. Once I receive the information requested, I will continue my review of the project. If you have any questions as to what is needed, please contact me. Sincerely, Ernest %Christianson Regional Engineer cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. Act 250 Environmental Commission #4 — Case #4C1005 Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation PUBLIC NOTICE OF APPLICATION RECEIVED FOR MEADOWLANDS BUSINESS COMPLEX VTS000047 4290-INDC The Water Quality Division of the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (the Department) has received an application for a permit to discharge stormwater runoff from the construction of an office building and associated infrastructure. The applicant is O'Brien Brothers Agency, LLC. The application was originally received on May 22, 2006. The project would discharge sediment and other construction -related pollutants to Potash Brook. The Department's tentative determination is to issue an individual discharge permit with conditions to control, prevent, and mitigate impacts on water quality. Written comments will be accepted at the address below until the close of the public comment period on Monday, July 24, 2006. All comments must be received by the Department no later than 4:30 p.m. on that date. A public hearing will be held if there is significant public interest. Interested persons should contact the Water Quality Division at (802) 241-3770 to either request a hearing or to be contacted in the event one is to be held. For information on the application, access to related documents, including the permit fact sheet and the draft permit, or a copy of the Water Quality Standards, interested persons should contact: Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Water Quality Division 103 South Main Street, 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 Telephone: 802-241-3770 A copy of the draft discharge permit is available at this time. The draft permit, fact sheet, and notice will be available within the next five days at the Water Quality Division website: http://www.anr.state.vt.us/dec/waterg/wqdhome.htm. v, ) tkXk�4e -r- M `I- �. . - Wallace McLean, for Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation June 22, 2006 The Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation is an equal opportunity agency and offers all persons the benefits of participating in each of its programs and competing in all areas of employment regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or other nonmerit factors. AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408 FACT SHEET NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT TO DISCHARGE TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES NPDES NO: VTS000047 PERMIT NO: 4290-INDC NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: O'Brien Brothers Agency Inc. P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05403 LOCATION OF DISCHARGE: Wetland discharging to Potash Brook RECEIVING WATERS: Potash Brook CLASSIFICATION: Class B I. Proposed Action, Discharge, and Location The above named applicant has applied for an individual discharge permit for stormwater runoff from construction sites pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §1258, §1259, § 1263; the federal Clean Water Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., including §1342(p); and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations including 40 CFR 122.26 and 40 CFR 122.28. This application was received on May 22, 2006. The source of stormwater is constriction of an office building and associated infrastructure. Requiring an Individual Permit The Secretary finds that this project does not qualify for coverage under the Construction General Permit 3-9001 (2003) (CGP) Section I(C) 6., issued April 17, 2003, because the project will because the project will discharge stormwater runoff to state waters listed on the State of Vermont's current 303(d) list as impaired. Section I(C) of the CGP states: H. C Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 2 of 4 6. Stormwater runoff from construction sites where the discharge will cause, or have reasonable potential to cause or contribute to, a violation of water quality standards or constitute a significant contributor of pollution as defined in the General Permit Rules. The Department has determined that the construction as permitted may still result in unavoidable short-term exceedances of the water quality criteria for phosphorus and aquatic biota, wildlife, and aquatic habitat. In authorizing this activity, the Department has concluded that the activity qualifies for a waiver, with respect to these criteria, as a limited duration activity under the provision of Section 2-03(B)(1) of the Vermont Water Quality Standards. Although exceedances of the turbidity standards for cold water habitat are expected, the project is not expected to conflict with Class B management objectives and the maintenance and protection of existing uses. Construction as proposed qualifies the project as a limited duration activity under Section 2-03(B) (1) of the Vermont Water Quality Standards. The Limited Duration Activities provision of the Standards allows for unavoidable short-term non- compliance with turbidity and aquatic biota criteria: a. Any required permit specifically identifies one or both criteria for which a waiver is being granted, specifically cites this provision of these rules, and requires full compliance with all other criteria; b. Any required permit contains terms and conditions designed to limit adverse impacts to water quality as a result of the non-compliance to the greatest extent possible including, but not limited to, the use of best management practices; c. The non-compliance is limited to the turbidity and aquatic biota, wildlife, and habitat criteria, is unavoidable and occurs for the shortest period of time necessary; and d. All existing uses are maintained and protected. Description of Discharge Stormwater runoff with pollutants associated with construction activities. III. Authoritv Discharge permits are issued under the authority 10 V.S.A., Chapter 47, Water Pollution Control. In 1987 Congress amended the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act, requiring the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate stormwater discharges under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program. In November 1990, EPA published regulations that established permit application Mountain View Office Park Lot 4 NPDES Number: VTS000045 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 3805-INDC.1 Page 3 of 4 requirements for stormwater discharges "associated with industrial activity". EPA defined industrial activity in a comprehensive manner, covering a wide range of facilities in the regulatory requirements. Among the facilities included under its definition are construction activities that result in the disturbance of five or more acres of land. Construction sites are distinct from the other industrial activities included in the federal stormwater program and are appropriately covered under a separate general permit. As a delegated state under the NPDES program, the State of Vermont has the responsibility to administer the permit program and issue permits for discharges within the state. Most discharges of stormwater runoff from construction sites are authorized under a general permit. This particular project did not qualify for authorization under the general permit because this project will result in an activity that may cause or contribute to an existing impairment. The construction activities will discharge only to Class B waters. Class B waters are managed to achieve and maintain a level of quality that is suitable for swimming, boating and fishing; consistently exhibit good aesthetic value; provide high quality habitat for aquatic biota, and wildlife; is suitable for public water supply with filtration and disinfection; and is suitable for irrigation and, other agricultural uses, swimming, and recreation (Vermont Water Quality Standards, Section 3-04(A) Class B Waters: Management Objectives). IV. Tentative Decision Tentative determinations regarding the discharge and other conditions to be imposed on the pending Vermont permit have been made by the Department. The Department's tentative determination is to grant a discharge permit subject to the conditions contained in the draft permit currently on notice. The tentative determination to grant a permit is based on the applicant's development of an erosion prevention and sediment control plan ("Plan") and on the special provisions of this permit. The Plan has been prepared and will be implemented in conjunction with the general earthworks at the site. The Plan has been prepared to meet, at a minimum, the protection outlined in Vermont's erosion prevention and sediment control handbook. The objective of the Plan is to prevent erosion and the transport of sediments to surface waters. The minimum elements included in the Plan are information on proximity to surface. waters, existing vegetative cover and topography, soils, a grading plan, a schedule and phasing plan which limits the amount of exposed soil to five acres or less at any point in time (less during the winter months), erosion prevention and sediment control specifications, a turbidity monitoring plan, oversight by and Environmental Specialist, and a narrative strategy. The Plan is designed to limit the risk of erosion by minimizing the extent and duration of exposed soil. Mountain View Office Park Lot 4 NPDES Number: VTS000045 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 3805-INDC.1 Page 4 of 4 V. Procedure Written public comments on the proposed permit are invited and must be received on or before 4:30 pm .Monday, July 24, 2006 by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408. Comments may also be faxed to (802)241-3287 or e-mailed to matt.dewolfe(a,state.vt.us. All comments received by the above date will be considered in formulation of the final determinations. C NPDES Number: VTS000047 Permit Number: 4290-INDC STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET, BUILDING 10 NORTH WATERBURY, VT 05671-0408 DRAFT DISCHARGE PERMIT For Stormwater Runoff from the Construction of a Commercial Building and Associated Parking, Utilities, and Infrastructure In compliance with provisions of the following state and federal laws and rules: the Vermont Water Pollution Control statute, 10 V.S.A. Chapter 47, including §§ 1259 and 1263; the Vermont Water Pollution Control Rules, Chapter 13, the federal Clean Water Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., including 33 USC 1342(p); and the regulations of the federal Environmental Protection Agency including 40 CFR 122.26 and in accordance with terms and conditions hereinafter specified; Principal Permittee: O'Brien Brothers Agency Inc. P.O. Box 2t84 South Burlington, VT 05403 Co-permittees: (Applications for co-permittee status must be received by the Department prior to engaging in construction activities.) are hereby authorized by the Secretary, Agency of Natural Resources, to discharge stormwater runoff from the construction site of the Meadowlands Business Complex, including a commercial building, parking, and site utilities and infrastructure to Potash Brook. The applicant has provided the Secretary with an Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control plan (EPSC Plan) as part of the application. PART I. COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT A. Discharges Covered This permit covers the discharge of stormwater runoff from the construction site of the commercial building, parking, and site utilities and infrastructure to Potash Brook. This permit only applies to construction -related activities performed in accordance with the EPSC Plan. This permit may also cover discharges from excavation dewatering activities associated with construction once a dewatering "'Meadowlands Business complex Erosion Prevention & Sediment Control Plan ", prepared by Krebs & Lansing Engineers, Inc. and received May 24, 2006. Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 2 of 18 plan has been approved in writing by the Department and as long as provisions have been made in the EPSC Plan to properly treat this water before it is discharged. This permit does not cover post -construction operational stormwater discharges from the site. B. Requiring an Individual Permit The Secretary finds that this project does not qualify for coverage under Construction General Permit 3-9001(2003) (CGP) Section I(C) 6, issued April 17, 2003, because the project will discharge stormwater runoff to state waters listed on the State of Vermont's current 303(d) list as impaired due to sediment. Section I(C) of the CGP states: 6. Stormwater runoff from construction sites where the discharge will cause, or have reasonable potential to cause or contribute to, a violationof water quality standards or constitute a significant contributor of pollution as defined' in the General Permit Rules. The Department has determined that the construction as permitted may still result in unavoidable short-term exceedances of the water quality criteria for turbidity and aquatic biota, wildlife, and aquatic habitat. In authorizing this activity, the Department has concluded that the activity qualifies for a waiver, with respect to these criteria, as a limited duration activity under the provisions of Section 2- 03(13)(1) of the Vermont Water Quality Standards. Although exceedances of the turbidity standards for cold water habitat are expected, the project is not expected to conflict with Class B management objectives and the maintenance and protection of existing uses. Construction as proposed qualifies the project as a limited duration activity under Section 2- 03.13.1 of the Vermont Water Quality Standards. The Limited Duration Activities provision of the Standards allow for short term exceedances of the turbidity and total suspended solids provided that: a. Any required permit specifically identifies one or both criteria for which a waiver is being granted, specifically cites this provision of these rules, and requires full compliance with all other criteria; b. Any required permit contains terms and conditions designed to limit adverse impacts to water quality as a result of the non-compliance to the greatest extent possible including, but not limited to, the use of best management practices; c. The non-compliance is limited to the turbidity and aquatic biota, wildlife, and habitat criteria, is unavoidable and occurs for the shortest period of time necessary; and d. All existing uses are maintained and protected. This permit: 1. Cites the Limited Duration Activities provision, identifies the criteria for which a waiver is being granted, and requires full compliance with all other criteria; 0 Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 3 of 18 2. Contains terms and conditions designed to limit adverse impacts to the greatest extent possible, including requiring a comprehensive Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan which includes turbidity monitoring, an obligation to perform corrective action when necessary, phasing to minimize the extent and duration of exposed soils, and the requirement for oversight of Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control by an On -Site Plan Coordinator and an Environmental Specialist; 3. Limits the non-compliance to turbidity and aquatic biota, wildlife, and habitat criteria and recognizes that non-compliance may be unavoidable on this construction site; and 4. Provides reasonable assurance that the project, if completed in conformance with the conditions of this permit, will not conflict with Class B management objectives and the maintenance and protection of existing uses. Sediment is the identified primary pollutant of concern. PART II. PROHIBITIONS Discharges of any material associated with construction activities, other than stormwater and water from excavation dewatering, are prohibited by this permit. This prohibition includes but is not limited to vehicle and equipment maintenance spills, fuels, wash water, construction debris, oil, wet concrete (including washout water from concrete batch trucks or equipment used to mix concrete), and other substances. PART III. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER DISCHARGES A. Operation and Maintenance of Control Measures The permittees shall at all times properly operate and maintain all stormwater treatment, erosion control, and sediment control measures which are installed or used to achieve compliance with this permit. All temporary measures shall be removed upon project completion or site stabilization, whichever occurs last. B. Proper Disposal of Sediment Sediments and other pollutants collected and removed in the course of the treatment of stormwater runoff associated with construction activities shall be disposed of in a manner that will not result in the sediments and pollutants entering waters of the State. Disposal sites must be submitted for approval in writing by the Department (see Part IV (D)) and shall generally be located on relatively level terrain with an isolation distance of at least 100 feet from any surface waters, including wetlands. This permit does not authorize the disposal of sediment in a wetland or any corrective action undertaken to remove sediment from a wetland. Any such activity may require a conditional use determination Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 4 of l8 pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 905 (b) or a permit pursuant to Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act, or both. C. Posting of Notice at Construction Site The Principal Permittee shall post at a location visible to the public a notice containing the permit number, the text: "Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation ((802) 241-3770) has authorized the discharge of stormwater runoff from this construction site", the name and telephone number of the permittee's local contact person, the location where a copy of the Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan is available, and a brief description of the project. The notice shall be placed near the construction entrance` unless there is a safety concern. This permit does not, however, provide the public with any rights to trespass on the construction site for any reason, including site inspection, nor does it obligate the permittee to allow members of the public to access the site. D. Refuse and Debris All refuse and debris related to construction activities shall be disposed of properly, including non -biodegradable erosion control products. E. On -Site Plan Coordinator The Principal Permittee shall designate a person or persons who are directly responsible for on -site implementation of the EPSC Plan. Such person or persons shall have the authority to stop or modify construction activities as necessary to comply with the EPSC Plan and the terms and conditions of this permit and shall be responsible for inspections and record keeping. The On -Site Plan Coordinator shall generally be on site on a daily basis during active construction unless there is just cause for such absence. The name and daytime telephone number of this individual shall be, provided on the application or filed in writing before the start of construction if the Coordinator has not been selected at the time the application is filled. F. Inspections by On -.Site Plan Coordinator All erosion and sediment control structures and measures shall be inspected by or under the direction of the On -Site Plan Coordinator at least once every seven (7) calendar days and as soon as possible but no later than 24 hours after any storm event which generates a discharge of stormwater runoff from the construction site. If there is no winter construction and all exposed soils and drainage channels have been at least temporarily protected, inspections may be suspended between December 15 and March 15, but the final inspection record for the season shall clearly show the status of site grading and stabilization efforts at the end of the construction season. G. Record Keeping Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 5 of 18 The On -Site Plan Coordinator shall keep a written record of all inspections and all water quality monitoring data and shall note all problem areas and the measures taken to correct those problems and prevent future problems. The records shall reflect: a) The status of the project in terms of consistency with the planned construction sequence; b) What areas are disturbed at the time of the inspection; and c) What areas have been temporarily or permanently stabilized since the last inspection record. The On -Site Plan Coordinator shall sign each inspection record. For construction sites where inspections are also being made by a registered professional engineer or a Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control, inspection reports shall also be done by that individual and incorporated in the records. The inspection records shall be kept on site and shall be made available to the Secretary or his/her designated representative on request. The Principal Permittee shall retain a copy of the EPSC Plan and any records required by this permit for a minimum of three (3) years following completion of construction activities. This period shall be extended during the course of unresolved litigation regarding violations of this permit. H. EPSC Plan Availability The Principal Permittee shall provide a copy of the EPSC Plan to the On -Site Plan Coordinator and all contractors responsible for construction activities that involve soil disturbance. A copy of the EPSC Plan shall be kept on site at all times and shall be made available to the Secretary or his/her designated representative upon request. EPSC Plan Amendment There are at least two scenarios that would require an amendment to the EPSC Plan. The Principal Permittee shall amend the EPSC Plan prior to implementing any change in the design, construction, operation or other procedure which would significantly increase the risk of erosion and the discharge of sediment to waters of the State. Examples of activities in this category include but are not limited to: changes in the project schedule that significantly increase the length of exposure of soils; shifting earthworks into the winter season; or reducing the isolation distance between disturbance areas and State waters. 2. An amendment to the EPSC Plan is required, if after taking corrective action, as required in Section III. J. below, it is determined that the EPSC Plan Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 6 of 18 requires an amendment to be effective in future efforts in preventing erosion and controlling the discharge of sediment. The amended portions of the EPSC Plan shall be filed with the Secretary along with an explanation of the reasons for the changes. Proposed amendments to the project or the EPSC Plan require prior written authorization from the Department. The requirement to file the amended EPSC Plan is not intended to delay the implementation of reasonable and effective steps to control erosion where inaction would significantly degrade water quality. Taking corrective action is always required when a discharge is observed as described below in Section II1. J. Corrective Action Any evidence of measurable amounts of sediment or sediment laden water leaving the construction site or any visible discoloration of surface waters (including wetlands) shall be noted and immediate action taken to correct the discharge, including halting or reducing construction activities as necessary until the discharge and/or the condition is fully corrected. In such an event, the Department shall be notified immediately of the problem and the corrective actions that have been or are being taken. The corrective action should be designed to limit the adverse impacts of the discharge to the greatest extent possible, consistent with the requirements of the Limited Duration Activities provision, as set forth in Part I of this permit. A written report, fully describing the condition, including the source, the cause, why the EPSC Plan did not prevent the problem, how the problem was addressed, and a timetable describing when the violation occurred and when corrective action was taken, shall be filed within seven (7) days of when the problem is first identified. Reports shall be sent to: Department of Environmental Conservation Water Quality Division, Construction Stormwater Section 103 S. Main Street, Building ION Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 K. Late Fall/Winter/Spring Construction Activities Winter construction has not been approved for this project. For any site work between October 15 and May 1, a special Winter EPSC Plan shall be filed with the Secretary prior to September 15 and approved in writing by the Secretary. All measures possible will be taken to limit the exposure of soils during all late fall, winter, and spring construction activities. The Secretary reserves the right to require suspension of construction activities until the next construction season if winter construction is determined to present a significant risk to water quality. Also, the Secretary reserves the right to prohibit construction activities before Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 7 of 18 May 1 if spring construction is determined to present a significant risk to water quality. L. Duty to Comply All permittees shall comply with all terms and conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of 10 V.S.A. Chapter 47 and the federal Clean Water Act and is grounds for an enforcement action, or suspension or revocation of any permittee's authorization to discharge under this permit. M. Duty to Reapply If a discharge from the construction site is anticipated to continue after the expiration date of this permit, the Principal Permittee must reapply for coverage under a new permit sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date of this permit. N. Termination of Coverage Coverage under this permit is terminated upon the completion of all of the following: 1. All land disturbing activities on the site, 2. Permanent stabilization of all disturbed areas on the site through the establishment of a vigorous vegetative cover, the implementation of other approved stabilization measures, and the graveling or paving of road surfaces, and 3. The Principal Permittee's filing of the Notice of Termination, signed by the Principal Permittee or the Principal Permittee's authorized agent, with the Secretary (this form can be downloaded at http://wtivw.vtwaterquality.org/stormwater/htm/sw_cgp htm). O. Transfer of Permit The Principal Permittee may transfer this permit by submitting a notice of transfer to the Secretary. The notice shall be submitted thirty (30) days prior to the proposed date of transfer and shall include the following: l . The name and address of the present permittee(s); 2. The name and address of the prospective Principal Permittee; 3. The name and daytime telephone number of the On -Site Plan Coordinator, if different; 4. The proposed date of transfer; and 5. A statement signed by the prospective Principal Permittee, stating that: a. The conditions of the facility operation/construction activity that contribute to, or affect, the discharge will not be materially different under the new ownership; Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 8 of 18 b. The prospective Principal Permittee has read and is familiar with the terms of the permit and agrees to comply with all the terms and conditions of the permit; and C. The prospective Principal Permittee has adequate funding or other means to effect compliance with all the terms of the permit. P. Assignment of Co-Permittee Status to Contractors All contractors and subcontractors engaged in project activities that may add pollutants to stormwater runoff must obtain co-permittee status. The Principal Permittee shall notify all contractors of this requirement. The contractor shall file a written request for co-permittee status on the Request for Co-Permittee Status Form (Individual Permit) available from the Department. The form includes the contractor's name, address, business phone number, site telephone number (if one), and a statement that he/she has read and is familiar with the terms of the permit and agrees to comply with all the terms and conditions of the permit. The form can be found at: http://wwtiv.vrivaterqualitv.org_/stotmwater/htm/sw cgp.htm. Contractors that commence such construction activities without obtaining co-permittee status will be in violation of this permit. Q. Right of Entry The Principal Permittee shall allow the Secretary or his/her authorized representatives, upon presentation of credentials to: 1. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a discharge is located or in which any records are required to be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit; and 2. At any time inspect the site and sample any discharge, and at reasonable times have access to and copy any records required to be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit. R. Limitations Issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of Federal, State, or local laws or regulations. Nothing in this permit shall be construed as having relieved, modified, or in any manner affected the permittee's on -going obligation to comply with all other federal, state or local statues, regulations or directives applicable to the permittees in the operation of its business, nor does it relieve the permittees of the obligation to obtain all necessary state, local and federal permits. !Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 9 of 18 This permit does not convey authorization to conduct any activity within wetlands including but not limited to: clearing, grading, excavation, placement of temporary or permanent erosion and sediment control structures, or any other activity required by this permit. Any such activity within a wetland may require a conditional use determination pursuant 10 V.S.A. Section 905(b) and/or a permit pursuant to Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act or both. S. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity not a Defense It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. T. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of legal action or relieve a permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities or penalties to which a permittee is or may be subject under 10 V.S.A. Section 1281. U. Penalty for Permit Violation 10 V.S.A. Section 1275(a) provides that: Any person who violates any provision of this subchapter or who fails, neglects or refuses to obey or comply with any order or the terms of any permit issued in accordance with this subchapter, shall be fined not more than $25,000.00 or be imprisoned not more than six months, or both. Each violation may be a separate offense and, in the case of a continuing violation, each day's continuance may be deemed a separate offense. 10 V.S.A. Section 8010(c) provides that: A penalty of not more than $25,000.00 may be assessed for each determination of violation. In addition, if the secretary determines that a violation is continuing the secretary may assess a penalty of not more than $10,000.00 for each day the violation continues. The maximum amount of penalty assessed under this subsection such not exceed $100,000.00. V. Penalty for False Statement 10 V.S.A. Section 1275 (b) provides that: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document filed or required to be maintained under this subchapter, or by any permit, rule, regulation or order issued under this subchapter, or who falsifies, Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 10 of 18 tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this subchapter or by any permit, rule, regulation, or order issued under this subchapter, shall upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000.00 or by imprisonment for not more than six months, or by both. PART IV. SPECIAL CONDITIONS A. Dewatering Dewatering activities have been addressed in the EPSC Plan. For additional dewatering activities, a site -specific dewatering ,plan shall be submitted to the Department and approved in writing prior to commencing construction. Pumpage from areas excavated for the construction of the project shall be treated or disposed of in such manner that the turbidity criteria of Vermont Water Quality Standards are met. Prior to anv dewatering activities which may result in the pumpage reaching State waters by surface flow, the Principal Permittee shall measure and document the turbidity value to ensure that it is sufficient to comply with the instream turbidity standard of 10 NTU. The inspection reports shall contain information on when dewatering is being done, measures being utilized for treatment, and effectiveness of those measures. , B. Engineering/Environmental Specialist Oversight, Biweekly Reporting, and Record Keeping In addition to the weekly inspections required by the On -Site Plan Coordinator, the Principal Permittee shall designate an Engineer/Environmental Specialist who will be responsible for performing environmental inspections throughout the project; confirming ,water resources protection throughout the project, and for related record keeping. The name, address, telephone number, and basic qualifications of the person shall be provided to the Department before the start of construction. This person shall not be the On -Site Plan Coordinator. The Engineer/Environmental Specialist shall determine, confirm, and report whether the EPSC Plan is being followed and that appropriate revisions are being made to the EPSC Plan where the EPSC Plan proves inadequate. In addition, the Engineer/Environmental specialist shall, in conjunction with the On -Site Plan Coordinator, bear the responsibility of reviewing the site to ensure compliance with the approved EPSC Plan and to modify the EPSC Plan to prevent discharges or identify areas where the Plan is insufficient The Engineer/Environmental Specialist shall notify the contractor when changes in practice are necessary to comply with the EPSC Plan and the terms and conditions of this permit. The Engineer/Environmental Specialist shall be Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page I 1 of 18 responsible for inspections, photo documentation, and record keeping and shall, biweekly during project construction, file with the Department a report outlining: a. Construction status; b. Erosion control measures in place at the time; c. New measures undertaken subsequent to the prior report; d. Erosion problems encountered and how and when resolved (time is of the essence) (photographs required); e. Status of the project in terms of consistency with the planned construction sequence; f. General description and quantification of areas disturbed at the time of the inspection (must be less than five acres, see Part IV(N)); g. Areas temporarily or permanently stabilized since the last inspection record; h. Changes in the EPSC Plan that are required (including submission for authorization from the Department, when necessary); and i. When dewatering is underway, discussion and/or photographs of measures being utilized for treatment, and effectiveness of those measures. This report is different than the weekly report of the On -Site Plan Coordinator. Reports shall be submitted by the Wednesday following the end of the biweekly period. Reports shall be filed with: Department of Environmental Conservation Water Quality Division, Stormwater Section 103 South Main Street, Building ION Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 Each inspection report shall be prepared in consultation with the On -Site Plan Coordinator, shall include a review of the coordinator's recent inspection reports, and shall be signed by the Engineer/Environmental Specialist. C. Pre -winter and Pre -summer Joint Site Inspection Between September 1 and September 15 of each construction season, a joint site inspection, scheduled by the Principal Permittee, shall be held with the Department to discuss the status of erosion control measures, their adequacy for over -wintering, and the identification of additional measures or actions that may reduce the risk of sediment pollution. The Principal Permittee shall schedule a second joint site inspection to be held in early spring after there has been sufficient snowmelt to allow for inspection of the areas disturbed during the prior year's construction and judgment of the adequacy of erosion prevention and sediment control measures. Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 12 of I8 D. Temporary Disturbance Areas/Spoil Areas/Borrow Pits The EPSC Plan does not include an off -site waste disposal area. All waste areas are subject to all of the terms and conditions of this permit. Prior to disturbing areas outside of the construction limits shown on the plans such as contractor staging areas, soil disposal sites, or opening borrow pits, the Principal Permittee shall request written authorization from the Department pursuant to Section III(I). The Principal Permittee shall provide information on protection of water quality as needed, including isolation distances from State waters, phasing, limits of disturbance, temporary stabilization method and schedule, erosion prevention, and reclamation plans for the area. E. Protection of Riparian Buffers and Non -disturbance Areas The Principal Permittee shall delineate and install barriers or clearly flag areas that are to be left undisturbed and to prevent incursions into these areas. At a minimum, riparian (including wetland) buffers shall be provided consistent with the EPSC Plan and any Conditional Use Determination. All riparian buffer flagging or barrier delineations shall be inspected and approved by the Department prior to any earth disturbance in adjacent areas. F. Reporting and Monitoring Requirement Reporting and monitoring requirements are contained in Section III(F) and (G); Section III(J); and Section IV (B). Further, the Principal Permittee shall develop a turbidity monitoring plan that defines sampling station locations, sampling frequency, and protocols to enhance the continuing assessment of the adequacy of the EPSC Plan to abate sediment pollution. The Monitoring Plan shall be filed with the Department for approval, and construction shall not commence until an approved Monitoring Plan is in place. Data collected under the Monitoring Plan shall be reported in each bi-weekly report as required in Section IV(B). The sampling plan may be adapted to changing construction circumstances; such changes are subject to prior approval in accordance with Section III(I). G. Stream Crossings Design drawings for each permanent stream crossing (if any) shall be filed with the Department, and construction on any permanent crossing may not commence before design approval is granted. Insofar as practicable, the designs shall limit the disturbance of riparian areas. The limits of disturbance upstream and downstream of the crossings and approaches (within the stream buffers) shall be delineated and barriers installed prior to commencement of associated work within the buffer zone. H. Pre -construction Conferences, Co-permittee Status, and Updated Schedule Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 13 of 18 Pre -construction conferences shall be held for the commencement of earth disturbing construction. The Department shall be given at least seven (7) days written notice before the preconstruction conferences. Notice shall include: 1. Date, time, and location of the pre -construction meeting; 2. An updated schedule for project construction; 3. Dewatering plans for all proposed dewatering activities including turbidity monitoring prior to discharge; and 4. Unless already filed with the Department, application(s) for co- permittee status from any contractor engaged in project activities. Treatment using Polyacrylamides Any treatment measures using polyacrylamides are subject to prior approval under the terms of Section III (I) above. Consultation with Engineer/Environmental Specialist during Corrective Actions The Eno, ineer/E nv ironmental Specialist shall be consulted with respect to the adequacy of abatement measures taken pursuant to Section III(J). Unless immediate action is necessary to prevent a recurrence of the problem, the Engineer/Environmental Specialist shall be consulted prior to taking corrective action. K. Final Removal of Temporary Erosion Control Measures Prior to the filing of a Notice of Termination, all temporary erosion and sediment control measures, such as silt fence, shall be removed. L. Submission of Reduced Size EPSC Plans The applicant shall provide the Agency and contractor with a comprehensive I I" x 17" set of the EPSC Plan at or prior to the pre -construction meeting, including all supporting narrative information submitted during the development of this EPSC Plan. M. Update of EPSC Plan The EPSC Plan which is kept on site shall be kept current by incorporating all changes that have been approved in accordance with Section III (I). N. Maximum Exposed Area The maximum exposed soil at any time shall be less than five acres. Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 14 of 18 PART V. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR ALL INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGESZ A. Change in Discharge All discharges authorized herein shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this permit. The discharge of any pollutant identified in this permit more frequently than or at a level in excess of that authorized shall constitute a violation of this permit. Any anticipated facility expansions, production increases, or process modifications which will result in new, different, or increased discharges of pollutants must be reported by submission of a new permit application or, if such changes will not violate the effluent limitations specified in this permit, by notice to the permit issuing authority of such changes. Following such notice, the permit may be modified to specify and limit any pollutants not previously limited. B. Noncompliance Notification If, for any reason, a permittee does not comply with or will be unable to comply with any daily maximum effluent limitation specified in this permit, the Principal Permittee shall notify the Secretary within 24 hours- of becoming aware of such condition or by the next business day, and shall provide the Secretary with the following information, in writing, within five (5) days. a. A description of the discharge and cause of noncompliance; and b. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times; or, if not corrected, the anticipated time the noncompliance is expected to continue, and steps being taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the noncomplying discharge. C. Facilities Operation The permittees shall, at all times, maintain in good working order and operate as efficiently as possible all treatment or control facilities or systems installed or used by the permittees to achieve compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. D. Quality Control The Principal Permittee shall calibrate and perform maintenance procedures on all monitoring and analytical instrumentation at regular intervals to ensure accuracy of measurements or shall ensure that both activities will be conducted. The 2 Note that, because the terms and conditions in this part apply to a broad range of industrial discharges, some of the terms and conditions may not apply to this particular activity. The Department should be consulted if there is a question as to the applicability or intent of individual terms or conditions. Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 15 of 18 Principal Permittee shall keep records of these activities and shall provide such records upon request of the Secretary. The Principal Permittee shall verify the accuracy of the flow measurement device no less than weekly and report the results on the monthly report forms. The acceptable limit of error is f 10%. Samples shall be representative of the volume and quality of effluent discharged over the sampling and reporting period. All samples are to be taken during normal operating hours. The Principal Permittee shall identify the effluent sampling location used for each discharge. E. Adverse Impact The permittees shall take all reasonable steps to minimize any adverse impact to waters of the State resulting from noncompliance with any conditions specified in this permit, including such accelerated or additional monitoring as necessary to determine the nature and impact of the noncomplying discharge. F. Bypassing Any diversion from or bypass of facilities necessary to maintain compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit is prohibited, except where unavoidable to prevent loss of life or severe property damage. The Principal Permittee shall notify the Secretary within 24 hours of each such diversion or bypass. The Principal Permittee shall also submit a written notification within five (5) days of the occurrence. The written notification shall include the information as specified in Noncompliance Notification, Section V(B). G. Removed Substances Solids, sludges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewaters shall be disposed of in accord with the terms and conditions of any certification, interim or final, transitional operation authorization or order issued pursuant to 10 V.S.A., Chapter 159 that is in effect on the effective date of this permit or is issued during the term of this permit. H. Power Failure In order to maintain compliance with the effluent limitations and prohibitions of this permit, the permittees shall either: a. Provide an alternative power source sufficient to operate the wastewater control facilities, or if such alternative power source is not in existence, b. Halt, reduce, or otherwise control production and/or all discharges upon the reduction, loss, or failure of the primary source of power to the wastewater control facilities. r Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 16 of 18 Emergency Pollution Permits Maintenance activities, or emergencies resulting from equipment failure or malfunction, including power outages, which result in an effluent which exceeds the effluent limitations specified herein, shall be considered a violation of the conditions of this permit, unless the permittees immediately applies for, and obtains, an emergency pollution permit under the provisions of 10 V.S.A., Chapter 47, § 1268. The Principal Permittee shall notify the Water Quality Division of the emergency situation by the next working day. 10 V.S.A., Chapter 47, § 1268 reads as follows: When a discharge permit holder finds that pollution abatement facilities require repairs, replacement, or other corrective action in order for them to continue to meet standards specified in the permit, he may apply in the manner specified by the secretary for an emergency pollution permit for a term sufficient to effect repairs, replacements or other corrective action. The permit may be issued without prior public notice if the nature of the emergency will . not provide sufficient time to give notice; provided that the secretary shall give public notice as soon as possible but in any event no later than five days after the effective date of the emergency pollution permit. No emergency pollution permit shall be issued unless the applicant certifies and the Secretary finds that: (1) There is no present, reasonable alternative means of disposing of the waste other than by discharging it into the waters of the State during the limited period of time of the emergency; (2) The dental of an emergency pollution permit would work an extreme hardship upon the applicant; (3) The granting of an emergency pollution permit will result in some public benefit; (4) The discharge will not be unreasonably harmful to the quality of the receiving waters; (5) The cause or reason for the emergency is not due to willful or intended acts or omissions of the applicant. Application shall be made to the Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, 103 South Main Street - Water Quality Division, Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408. Toxic Pollutants Notwithstanding Section V(K) below, if a toxic effluent standard or prohibition (including any schedule of compliance specified in such effluent standard or prohibition) is established under Section 307 (a) of the Clean Water Act for a toxic pollutant which is present in the discharge, and such standard or prohibition is more stringent than any limitation for such pollutant in this permit, this permit Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 17 of 18 shall be revised or modified in accordance with the toxic effluent standard or prohibition and the permittees so notified. K. Permit Modification After notice and opportunity for a hearing, this permit may be modified, suspended or revoked in whole or in part during its term for cause including, but not limited to, the following: a. Violation of any terms or conditions of this permit; b. Obtaining this permit by misrepresentation or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts; or c. A change in any condition that requires either a temporary or permanent reduction or elimination of the unauthorized discharge. L. Civil and Criminal Liability Except as provided in permit conditions on "Bypassing" (Section V(F)), "Power Failures" (Section V(H)), and "Emergency Pollution Permits" (Section V(1)), nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittees from civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance. Civil penalties, as authorized under 10 V.S.A. §1274 and 10 V.S.A. §8010, shall not exceed $10,000 a day for each day of violation. Criminal penalties, as authorized under 10 V.S.A. § 1275, shall not exceed $25,000 for each day of violation, imprisonment for up to six months, or both. M. State Laws Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittees from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to any applicable State law or regulation under authority preserved by Section 510 of the Clean Water Act. N. Severability The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit, or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby. PART VI. APPEALS Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $225.00, payable to the state of Vermont. Meadowlands Business Complex NPDES Number: VTS000047 Individual Discharge Permit Stormwater Runoff from Construction Sites Permit Number: 4290-INDC Page 18 of 18 The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.ven-nontiudiciary.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel.: (802) 828-1660). PART VII. REVOCATION 10 V.S.A. 1267 provides that: The Secretary may revoke any permit issued by him pursuant to this subchapter if he finds that the permit holder submitted false or inaccurate information in his application or has violated any requirement, restriction,; or condition of the permit issued. Revocation shall be effective upon actual notice thereof to the permit holder. This permit shall become effective upon signing and shall expire on 2011. Signed this day of 2006. Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation Wallace Mclean, Director Water Quality Division CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on this 301h day of June, 20056 five (5) copies of the attached letter to Stephanie Managhan, pertaining to the Meadowlands Business Complex in South Burlington, Vermont (4C1005) were to the District 4 Environmental Commission. Sefrf� CASE One copy of above referenced letter was sent via first class mail on June 30`h, 2006, to each of the following: O'Brien Brothers PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407-2184 City of South Burlington City Council 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 City of South Burlington Development Review Board 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 Dated at Colchester, Vermont this 30`h day of June, 2006. 05146. cert of service 6-30-06 I STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE RE: SUPER TEMP REALTY ) DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMPANY, LLC AND SUMMER ) COMMISSION # 4 ICE JOINT VENTURE, LLC. ) APPLICATION # 4C 1005-6 June 27, 2006 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Natural Resources ("Agency"), State of Vermont, by and through its staff, Julia Moore, in the above captioned matter. COMMENTS Criterion 9(F) — Energy Conservation In order to meet the requirements of Criterion 9(F), an applicant must demonstrate that the planning and design of the proposed subdivision or development reflects the principles of energy conservation and incorporates the best available technology for efficient use or recovery of energy. The Vermont Department of Public Service ("DPS") reviews Act 250 applications for compliance with Criterion 9(F). DPS supports permit issuance at this time, provided any land use permit includes language essentially stating: Energy design and construction shall comply with The 2001 Vermont Guidelines for Energy Efficient Commercial Construction and shall further include custom energy measures referenced in interagency comments by the Department of Public Service if found cost-effective on a life -cycle -cost basis. Any design or equipment features that do not comply with the 2001 Guidelines, or any custom measures not installed, shall be brought promptly to the attention of the Department of Public Service for comment, and to the District Commission for approval, prior to construction. The installation andlor use of electric resistance space heating is specifically prohibited without prior written approval of the District Commission, except for temporary emergencies. Application # 4C 1005-6 June 27, 2006 2 There are certain custom energy efficiency measures that make the project better conform with Criterion 9(F). These should be installed if they are cost-effective on a life cycle basis. Potential custom measures include: • Installation of highly energy efficient systems for heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) • Installation of highly energy efficient interior lighting fixtures/lamps • Installation of highly energy efficient exterior lighting fixtures/lamps, (e.g pulse -start metal halide or high pressure sodium lamps) • Installation of occupancy sensors to control lights in intermittently used spaces • Enhanced building envelope for a highly energy efficient building shell, (e.g. improved floor, wall, & roof insulation values, energy efficient doors & windows, and air sealing) • Installation of high efficiency appliances and office equipment, (e.g. Energy Star) • Use of NEMA premium efficiency motors in mechanical systems • Installation of high,efficiency electrical transformers, (e.g. Energy Star) Any questions about these comments should be directed to John M. Becker via phone (802-828- 4020) or e-mail (john.beckernstate.vt.us). Dated June 27, 2006, at Waterbury, Vermont. Respectfully submitted, State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources By: is S. Moore, P. . egul ory Management Division (8 ) 241-3687 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Andrea McKnight, Program Technician for the Agency of Natural Resources Division of Regulatory Management and Act 250 Review, sent a copy of the foregoing Comments and Entry of Appearance dated June 27, 2006 regarding File # 4C1005-6 by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to the following: Super -Temp Realty Company, LLC 133 Elm Street P.O. Box 277 Winooski, VT 05404 Summer Ice Joint Venture, LLC c/o Staige Davis 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 David S. Marshall, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 485 928 Falls Road Shelburne, VT 05482 Donna Kinville, Town Clerk Chair, City Council / Chair, City Planning Commission City Offices — 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05495 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 District #4 Environmental Commission 111 West Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 Dated June 27, 2006, at Waterbury, Vermont A drea McKni &ht I I . STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE RE: O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGENCY, ) DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL INC. ) COMMISSION # 4 APPLICATION # 4C1005-5 ) June 27, 2006 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Natural Resources ("Agency"), State of Vermont, by and through its staff, Julia Moore, in the above captioned matter. COMMENTS Criterion 9(F) — Energy Conservation In order to meet the requirements of Criterion 9(F), an applicant must demonstrate that the planning and design of the proposed subdivision or development reflects the principles of energy conservation and incorporates the best available technology for efficient use or recovery of energy. The Vermont Department of Public Service ("DPS") reviews Act 250 applications for compliance with Criterion 9(F). DPS supports permit issuance at this time, provided any land use permit includes language essentially stating: Energy design and construction shall comply with The 2001 Vermont Guidelines for Energy Efficient Commercial Construction and shall further include custom energy measures referenced in interagency comments by the Department of Public Service if found cost-effective on a life -cycle -cost basis. Any design or equipment features that do not comply with the 2001 Guidelines, or any custom measures not installed, shall be brought promptly to the attention of the Department of Public Service for comment, and to the District Commission for approval, prior to construction. The installation and/or use of electric resistance space heating is specifically prohibited without prior written approval of the District Commission, except for temporary emergencies. Application # 4C1005-5 June 27, 2006 2 There are certain custom energy efficiency measures that make the project better conform with Criterion 9(F). These should be installed if they are cost-effective on a life cycle basis. Potential custom measures include: • Installation of highly energy efficient systems for heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) • Installation of highly energy efficient interior lighting fixtures/lamps • Installation of highly energy efficient exterior lighting fixtures/lamps, (e.g pulse -start metal halide or high pressure sodium lamps) • Installation of occupancy sensors to control lights in intermittently used spaces • Enhanced building envelope for a highly energy efficient building shell, (e.g. improved floor, wall, & roof insulation values, energy efficient doors & windows, and air sealing) • Installation of high efficiency appliances and office equipment, (e.g. Energy Star) • Use of NEMA premium efficiency motors in mechanical systems • Installation of high efficiency electrical transformers, (e.g. Energy Star) Any questions about these comments should be directed to John M. Becker via phone (802-828- 4020) or e-mail (john.becker(2state.vt.us). Dated June 27, 2006, at Waterbury, Vermont. Respectfully submitted, State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources By: Vatory Moore, P.E. Management ivision (802) 241-3687 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Andrea McKnight, Program Technician for the Agency of Natural Resources Division of Regulatory Management and Act 250 Review, sent a copy of the foregoing Comments and Entry of Appearance dated June 27, 2006 regarding File # 4C 1005-5 by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to the following: O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05403 Munson Earth Moving Corp. 29 Colton Place Williston, VT 05495 Scott W. Homsted, P.E. Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Donna Kinville, Town Clerk Chair, City Council / Chair, City Planning Commission City Offices — 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05495 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 District #4 Environmental Commission I I I West Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 Dated June 27, 2006, at Waterbury, Vermont LGI: ilia r Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation PUBLIC NOTICE OF APPLICATION RECEIVED FOR MEADOWLANDS BUSINESS COMPLEX VTS000047 4290-INDC The Water Quality Division of the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (the Department) has received an application for a permit to discharge stormwater runoff from the construction of an office building and associated infrastructure. The applicant is O'Brien Brothers Agency, LLC. The application was originally received on May 22, 2006. The project would discharge sediment and other construction -related pollutants to Potash Brook. The Department's tentative determination is to issue an individual discharge permit with conditions to control, prevent, and mitigate impacts on water quality. Written comments will be accepted at the address below until the close of the public comment period on Monday, July 24, 2006. All comments must be received by the Department no later than 4:30 p.m. on that date. A public hearing will be held if there is significant public interest. Interested persons should contact the Water Quality Division at (802) 241-3770 to either request a hearing or to be contacted in the event one is to be held. For information on the application, access to related documents, including the permit fact sheet and the draft permit, or a copy of the Water Quality Standards, interested persons should contact: Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Water Quality Division 103 South Main Street, 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 Telephone: 802-241-3770 A copy of the draft discharge permit is available at this time. The draft permit, fact sheet, and notice will be available within the next five days at the Water Quality Division website: http://www.anr.state.vt.us/dec/waterq/wqdhome.htm. Wallace McLean, for Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation June 22, 2006 The Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation is an equal opportunity agency and offers all persons the benefits of participating in each of its programs and competing in all areas of employment regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or other nonmerit factors. AGENCY OF NATy %L RESOURCES (ANR) AND NATU,7 ^ "_ RESOURCES BOARD http://ww\A t _,ate.vt.us/dec/ead/pa/index.htm / http.t ww.nrb.state.vt.us/ PROJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS IS NOT A PERMIT TOTAL # OF DEC PERMITS: PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW: RESPONSE DATE: 99 PENDING APPLICATION #: i-ju-) a63� DISTRICT: TOWN: S (,+v��t PIN n96- 03&1 ,op - OWNER OF PROJECT SITE: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE: (Name) AA"soy-N r7a,4U'todrv'x' Corp, (Address) C PI cam. — % (Name) D" & ram.. i5roS, A�>nc� (Address) 1 (Town) (State) (Zip) a (Telephone5 '- Do (Town) (State) (Zip) 0 4 S (Telephone) 1 Project Name: a Based on a written or oral request or information provided by 5,oH received on 6-1.64 , a project was reviewed on a tract/tracts of land of $ • l7 acres, located on 11-4X Z_b;The project is generally described as: �+ t ; Car.3wc�,r w 1 I7i�� rt �n u : + S S� �- -� S'ocrr� s F Car, wwr,+r.� I.,s .s-e6,1 ►u 1,,,,.\ z(_gCtl oa&4�S'cee`41 '-- Z I.-'4 , .-'V- c► s �t;s�, I . Prior permits from this office: gC_1bb5 , rC-q- aoby PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ® I hereby request a jurisdictional opinion from the District Coordina r A i t �ordinator regarding the jurisdiction of 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250) over the project described above. / ❑ Lan o r/ gent iz Permit Specialist ❑ Other Person 1. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION, AND A WRITTEN REQUEST FROM THE ANR PERMIT SPECIALIST, THE LANDOWNER/AGENT, OR OTHER PERSON. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY REQUEST RECONSIDERATION FROM THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR (10 V.S.A. § 6007 (c) AND ACT 250 RULE 3 (C)) OR MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V. S.A. Chapter 220). (#47) ** Project:1XICommercial ❑ Residential ❑ Municipal Has the landowner subdivided before? ❑ Yes ElNo When/where: # of lots: AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED: es ❑ No Copies sent to Statutory Parties: ❑ Yeso BASIS FOR DECISION: _ (� SIGNATURE DATE: �� ,\ �o-w��..� DATE: Cb r3 OI�ADDRESS: District #� Environmental Commission District Coordinator ' Telephone: U WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUiRED?,kYes ❑ No Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit (#1 & #2)** ❑ Notice of Permit Requirements (deferral language) (#2) ❑ Floor Drains T1.2) ❑ Campgrounds (#3) ❑ Extension of sewer lines (#5) REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: F(, --4 Ckrr4,t,,,,90,, SIGNATURE: DATE: 6- F'Z ADDRESS: Dept. of Environmental Conservation Environmer} I i tance Division, Permit Specialist Telephone: 802-879-5676 Wastewater M agement Division, Telephone: 802-879-5656 OVER »»»»»»» **NOTE: NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES (#) REFER TO PERMIT INFORMATION SHEETS IN THE VERMONT PERMIT HANDBOOK http://www.anr.state.vt.us/dec/permit hb/index.htm THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON-BINDIN -TERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PER WHICH YOU MAY NEED PRI COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENTS INDICATED BELOW. 3. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3822) Contact: ❑ Discharge Permits: pretreatment; industrial, municipal (#7_1, 7_2, & 8) ❑ Indirect Discharge Permits (#9 & 9_1) ❑ Residuals Management (#10) 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (888-520-4879) Contact: ❑ Construction/modification of source (#14) ❑ Open Burning (#18) ❑ Wood Chip Burners (>90 HP) (#14) ❑ Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation (#14) ❑ Industrial Process Air Emissions (#14) ❑ Diesel Engines (>450 bHP) (#14) WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) (800-823-8500 in VT) Contact: New Hydrants (#22) ❑ >500' waterline construction (#22) ❑ Community Water System (CWS) ❑ Bottled Water (#20) ❑ Operating permit (#21) Transient Non -Community water system (TNC) (#21) 0 Capacity Review for Non -transient non -community water systems (NTNC) (#21) © WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR STORMWATER PERMITS (Hotline 802-241-4320) (#6 — 6_5 ) Contact: Contact: Stephanie Lanphear 802-241-4320 ❑ River Management (241-3770) ❑ Ponds (#32.1) S Construction General Permits >1AC of disturbance (#6.1) ❑ Shoreland Encroachment (241-3777) Steve Hanna W28 Q9 Stormwater from new development or redevelopment sites (#0.2 & 6_3) Wetlands (241-3770) (#29) IGj hn l�ov�-+e.� 1T� aJ39(o ❑ Multi -Sector General Permit (MSGP) industrial activities w/ SIC codes (#6.4) Stream Alteration / Section 401 Water Quality Certification / Stream Crossing Structures (476-2679 / 879-5631 / 786-5906) (#27 & 32) (Z)WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: ClArf S VjCk ❑ Hazardous Waste Handler site ID (241-3888) (#36) ❑ Underground Storage Tanks (24 -3888) (#33) ❑ Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities drop off (2,11-3444) !#37,39,!L- ❑ Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) 9Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) (#41 & 44) ❑ Composting Facilities (241-3444) (#43) ❑ Waste oil burning (241-3888) ❑ Waste transporter permit (#35) ❑ Demolition waste 241-3477 ❑ Used septic system components/stone (#41) 8. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR Contact: _ ❑ Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.) (241-3451) (#45) ❑ State -funded municipal water/sewer extensions/upgrades and Pollution Control Systems (241-3750) 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION & MERCURY DISPOSAL HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) (#46) Contact: SMALL BUSINESS & MUNICIPAL COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE (1-800-974-9559) Contact: Judy Mirro/John Daly RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) Contact: ((' FISH & WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT (802-241-3700) �Nongame & Natural Heritage Program (Threatened & Endangered Species) (#47.4) Contact : ❑ Stream Obstruction Approval (#47.5) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (802-479-7561) or District Office Contact: -Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, accessibility (Americans with Disabilities Act) (#49, 50, 50.1, 50.2) ❑ Storage of flammable liquids, explosives ❑ LP Gas Storage ❑ Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers (#50.2) ❑ Boilers and pressure vessels (#50.3) 12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: ❑ Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors (#51, 51.1, 52, 53, 53.1) ❑ Program for asbestos control & lead certification (#54, 55, 55.1) ❑ Children's camps ❑Hot Tub Installation & Inspection —Commercial (#51.1) 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: ❑ Child care facilities (1-800-649-2642 or 802-241-2159) (#57) ❑ Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities) (#59) ❑ Nursing Homes (241-2345) (#59) ❑ Assisted Living and Therapeutic Community Residences (241-2345) (#59) 14. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION ❑ Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) (#66) ❑ Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) (#63) ❑ Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) (#61) ❑ Construction within state highway right-of-way (Utilities, Grading, etc.) (828-2653) (#66) Contact: ❑ Junkyards (828-2053) (#62) ❑ Railroad crossings (828-2710) (#64) ❑ Airports and landing strips (828-2833) (#65) ❑ Motor vehicle dealer license (828-2067) (#68) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (800-675-9873 OR 802-828-3429) Contact: ❑ Use/sale of Pesticides (828-3429) (#72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78) ❑ Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-3429) (#81) ❑ Milk Processing Facilities (828-3429) (#83, 83.1, 85, 87) ❑ Animal shelters/pet merchant/livestock dealers (828-3429) (#89, 89.1) ❑ Golf Courses (828-2431) (#71) Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431)(#79) ❑ Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) (#88) ❑ Medium and Large Farm Operations (828-2431) ❑ Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Frozen Dessert/Class "C" Pesticides (828-3429) (#75.1, 80, 16. VERMONT ENERGY CODE ASSSISTANCE CENTER TOLL FREE 888-373-2255 ❑ VT Building Energy Standards (#47.2) 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3211) ❑ Historic Buildings (#47.1 & 101) ❑ Archeological Sites (#47.1 & 101) 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) ❑ Liquor Licenses (#90) ❑ General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2386) ❑ Business Registration (#90.1) ❑ Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) (#90.2) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551 & 828-5787) ❑ Income & business taxes (sales, meals/ rooms, etc) (#91, 92, 93, 24, 95, 96) DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2070) ❑ Fuel Taxes; Commercial Vehicle (#69-70) LOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 3. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 8 Carmichael St., Ste. 205, Essex Jct., VT 05452 (802) 872-2893 (#97, 98, & 99) OTHER: Sections #3424 above have been completed by Permit Specialist Jeff McMahon Date*-X,,,6 I may be reached at 802-879-5676 Copies have been mailed to: Revised 6/06 ACT 250 NOTICE MINOR APPLICATION 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092 On June 6, 2006, O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. and Munson Earth Moving Corp., filed application #4C1005-5 for a project generally described as: The construction of a 50,000 s.f. industrial/commercial building with ten individual units to be used as general offices (20%) and industrial/commercial activities (80%). The Project will be called Meadowlands Business Complex and is located on Lot #2 of Meadowlands Industrial Park in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. The District 4 Environmental Commission will review this application under Act 250 Rule 51 - Minor Applications. Copies of the application and proposed permit are available for review at the South Burlington Municipal Office, Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission located at 30 Kimball Avenue, South Burlington, and the office listed below. The application and proposed permit may also be viewed on the Natural Resources Board's web site (www.nrb.state.vt.us/lup) by clicking on "District Commission Cases," selecting "Entire Database," and entering the case number above. No hearing will be held unless, on or before Monday, July 3, 2006, a party notifies the District Commission of an issue or issues requiring the presentation of evidence at a hearing or the commission sets the matter for hearing on its own motion. Any hearing request shall be in writing to the address below, shall state the criteria or subcriteria at issue, why a hearing is required and what additional evidence will be presented at the hearing. Any hearing request by an adjoining property owner or other interested person must include a petition for party status. Prior to submitting a request for a hearing, please contact the district coordinator at the telephone number listed below for more information. Prior to convening a hearing, the District Commission must determine that substantive issues requiring a hearing have been raised. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law will not be prepared unless the Commission holds a public hearing. Should a hearing be held on this project and you have a disability for which you are going to need accommodation, please notify us by Monday, July 3, 2006. rties entitled to participate are the Municipality, the Municipal Planning Commission, the Regional inning Commission, adjoining property owners, other interested persons granted party status pursuant 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c). Non-party participant ay also be allowed under 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c)(5). led in Essex Junction, Vermont, this day of June, 2006. ti By _-z _ Stephanie H. Monaghan Natural Resources Board District #4 Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 T/ 802-879-5662 E/ stephanie.monaghan@state.vt.us 1005\4C 1005-5.not.wpd This is a DRAFT permit; please submit any written comments or corrections by Monday, July 3, 2006 to: Stephanie H. Monaghan, District #4 Coordinator, 111 West Street, Essex Junction, VT 05452. A permit will NOT be issued by the District Commission until the following information is received: 1) Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit issued by the ANR-DEC Wastewater Management Division 2) Construction General Permit by the ANR-DEC Division of Water Quality AMENDMENT CASE NO 4C1005-5 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED APPLICANT O'Brien Brothers Agency, Lac. 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001 - 6092 (Act 250) ADDRESS P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 and Munson Earth Moving Corp. 29 Colton Place Williston, Vermont 05495 District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues Land Use Permit Amendment 4C1005-5, pursuant to the authority vested in it by 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 651, Page 157, of the land records of the City of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Munson Earth Moving Corp., Co-Permittees as Grantees. This permit specifically authorizes the Permittees to construct a 50,000 s.f. industriaUcommercial building with ten individual units to be used as general offices (20%) and industriaUcommercial activities (80%). The Project will be called Meadowlands Business Complex and is located on Lot #2 of Meadowlands Industrial Park in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. The project is subject to Act 250 Jurisdiction because the project is a material or substantial change to a development over which the Commission has jurisdiction and thus constitutes "development" pursuant to Act 250 Rule 2(A). Accordingly, a land use permit amendment is required pursuant to Act 250 Rule 34. The Permittees, and their assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete, operate and maintain the project as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: 1. All conditions of Land Use Permit #4C1005 and amendments are in full force and effect except as amended herein. 2. By acceptance of this permit, the Permittees agree to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations and with this permit. Land Use Permit #4C1005-5 Page 2 3. The project shall be completed, operated and maintained in accordance with the plans and exhibits on file with the District Environmental Commission and the conditions of this permit. 4. The approved plans are: Sheet 1 - "Site Plan," dated May 3, 2006, last revision May 23, 2006; Sheet 2 - "Utility Plan," dated May 3, 2006, last revision May 23, 2006; Sheet 3 - "Lighting Plan," dated May 3, 2006; Sheet 4 - "Landscape Plan," dated May 3, 2006, last revision May 23, 2006; Sheet D-1 -."Details," dated May 3, 2006; Sheet D-2 - "Details," dated May 3, 2006; - Sheet D-3 - "Details," dated May 3, 2006; and Elevations and Typical Entrance Plan, dated May 10, 2006. 5. A copy of this permit and approved plans shall be on the site at all times throughout the construction process. 6. No changes shall be made in the design or use of this project without the written approval of the District Coordinator or the Commission, whichever is appropriate under the Environmental Board Rules. 7. Pursuant to Act 250 Rule 51(G), the permit application and material representations relied upon during the review and issuance of this permit by the District Commission shall provide the basis for determining future substantial and material changes to the approved project and for initiating enforcement actions. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed, operated and maintained in accordance with the terms of the permit, as provided by 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092 and the Act 250 Rules. 9. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the Permittees confirm and agree that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding upon and enforceable against the Permittees and all assigns and successors in interest. 10. The project is approved for the following maximum impacts: 90 - vehicle parking spaces 945 - gallons per day of wastewater; 945 - gallons per day of water; 389 —vehicle trips per day; 53 - AM peak hour vehicle trips; and 55 - PM peak hour vehicle trips. 11. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the following Agency of Natural Resources Permits: Land Use Permit #4C1005-5 Page 3 • Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit #WW-4-# issued on (date) by the Wastewater Management Division; • Construction General Permit; and • Final Discharge Permit # issued on (date) by the Water Quality Division Any subsequent nonmaterial changes to these permits shall be automatically incorporated herein upon issuance by the Agency of Natural Resources. Subsequent amendments involving material changes to the Act 250 permit shall not be constructed prior to review and approval of the District Coordinator or the District Commission underapplicable Act 250 Rules. 12. The Permittees shall apply and maintain calcium chloride and/or water on all roadways or disturbed areas within the project during construction and until pavement and/or vegetation is fully established to control dust. 13. The building approved herein is not approved for any manufacturing use or the on -site disposal of any process wastes. The Permittees shall apply and receive amended approval from the District Commission for any change in the use of the buildings which involves the storage or handling of any regulated substances or the generation of hazardous wastes. 14. The Permittees and all subsequent owners or lessees shall install and maintain only low -flow plumbing fixtures in any buildings. Any failed water conservation measures shall be promptly replaced with products of equal or better performance. 15. The Permittees shall comply with Exhibits # (Schedule B; and Sheet D-3) for erosion control. The Permittees shall prevent.the transport of any sediment beyond that area necessary for construction approved herein. All erosion control devices shall be periodically cleaned, replaced and maintained until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas. The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review erosion control and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to erosion control as it deems necessary. 16. All mulch, hay bales, siltation dams, water bars and other temporary devices shall be installed immediately upon grading and shall be maintained until all roads are permanently surfaced and all permanent vegetation is established on all slopes and disturbed areas. Hay bales shall be incorporated four inches into the soil and equipped with filter fence on the upstream side, butted together and all joints filled with loose hay. Topsoil stockpiles shall have the exposed earth completely mulched and have siltation checks around the base. 17. Grading shall be phased so that all exposed earth is mulched and water bars are in place at the end of each construction day. 18. All disturbed areas of the site shall be stabilized, seeded and mulched immediately upon completion of final grading. All disturbed areas not involved in winter construction shall be mulched and seeded before October 1. Between the periods of October 1 to April 15, all earth disturbing work shall conform with the "Winter Construction" standards and specifications of the Land Use Permit #4C1005-5 Page 4 Vermont Handbook for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control on Construction Sites (2003). 19. Prior to construction of the approved work, the Permittees shall complete the following: a) construction limits shall be clearly delineated with flagging or snowfencing; b) diversion ditches shall be placed on the uphill limits of the construction area; and c) temporary siltation controls shall be placed on the downhill limits of the construction. Immediately following the above, the permanent drainage system and/or roads shall be installed after which normal construction can begin. 20. To the greatest extent practicable, construction debris, including asphalt, concrete, brick, stone, scrap metal, carpet, clean wood and paper products, glass and most plastics, shall be recycled in accordance with the recommendations set forth in the Vermont Construction Site Reuse and Recycling Directory published in April, 1998 by the Agency of Natural Resources. 21. A copy of the approved erosion control plan shall be on the site at all times during construction. 22. In addition to conformance with all erosion control conditions, the Permittees shall not cause, permit or allow the discharge of waste material into any surface waters. Compliance with the requirements of this condition does not absolve the Permittees from compliance with 10 V.S.A. §§ 1250-1284, Vermont's Water Pollution Control Law. 23. The Permittees shall maintain a 50-foot undisturbed, naturally vegetated buffer strip between all watercourses on the project site and any disturbed areas. 24. All stumps shall be disposed of on -site above the seasonal high water table or at a State approved landfill so as to prevent groundwater pollution. 25. The Permittees and all assigns and successors in interest shall continually maintain the landscaping as approved in Exhibit # by replacing any dead or diseased plantings within the season or as soon as possible after the ground thaws, whichever is sooner. 26. Prior to any site work, the Permittees shall install and maintain temporary fencing along the tree line to be retained as depicted on Exhibit # . 27. The installation of exterior light fixtures is limited to those approved in Exhibit # , and shall be mounted no higher than (20) feet above grade level. All exterior lighting shall be installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources and reflector surfaces from view beyond the perimeter of the area to be illuminated. 28. The installation of exterior signage is limited to that approved in Exhibit #. The Permittees shall not erect additional exterior signage without first obtaining approval from the District Commission. Signage includes banners, flags, and other advertising displays, excepting temporary real estate marketing signs. 29. Energy design and. construction shall comply with the 2001 Vermont Guidelines for Energy Efficient Commercial Construction and shall further include custom energy measures referenced in interagency comments by the Department of Public Service if found cost-effective on a life- Land Use Permit #4C1005-5 Page 5 cycle -cost basis. Any design or equipment features that do not comply with the 2001 Vermont Guidelines, or any custom measures not installed, shall be brought promptly to the attention of the Department of Public Service for comment, and to the District Commission for approval, prior to construction. Exhibit #_ (ANR Entry of Appearance, dated �. 30. The installation and/or use of electric resistance space heat is specifically prohibited without the prior written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 31. At the completion of the project, and prior to the occupancy of the building, the Termittees shall certify by affidavit that the site improvements have been constructed in accordance with this permit pursuant to Rule 32(A). 32. Each prospective purchaser of any lots shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan, Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit, and the Land Use Permit Amendment before any written contract of sale is executed. 33. No further subdivision, alteration, and/or development of any parcel of land approved herein shall be permitted without the written approval of the District Commission. 34. The Permittees shall reference the requirements and conditions imposed by Land Use Permit #4C1005-5 in all deeds of conveyance and leases. 35. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6090(b)'this permit amendment is hereby issued for an indefinite term, as long as there is compliance with the conditions herein. Notwithstanding any other provision herein, this permit shall expire three years from the, date of issuance if the Permittees have not commenced construction and made substantial progress toward completion within the three year period in accordance with 10 V.S.A. ,§ 6091(b). 36. Failure to comply with all of the above conditions may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V:S.A. § 6090(c). Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this day of 2006. By: Kate Purcell, Acting Chair in this matter District #4 Environmental Commission Members participating in this decision: Gene Richards Chuck Dunham Any party may file a motion to alter with the District Commission within 15 days from the date of this decision, pursuant to Act 250 Rule 31(A). Decisions on minor applications may be appealed only if a hearing was held by the District Commission. Please note that there are certain limitations on the right to appeal. See 10 V.S.A. § 8504(k). Land Use Permit #4C1005-5 Page 6 Any appeal of this decision may be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of issuance, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $225.00, payable to the State of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must include all information required by Rule 5(b)(3) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings (VRECP). The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the VRECP. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available online at www.vermontiudiciary.org. As of February 14, 2005, the address for the Environmental Court is: Environmental Court, 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 0564f-8701. (Tel. # 802-828-1660) W:Wct250\DIST4\PROJECTS\4C 1005\4C1005-5.pmt.wpd CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on this 8" day of June, 2006, a copy of the foregoing ACT 250 NOTICE MINOR APPLICATION 94C1005-5, was sent first class mail, postage prepaid to: PARTIES: O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05403 Munson Earth Moving Corp. 29 Colton Place Williston, VT 05495 Scott W. Homsted, P.E. Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Donna Kinville, Town Clerk Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City Offices - 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05495 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney ANR - 103 South Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission Kate Purcell, Acting Chair/Gene Richards/Chuck Dunham 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 NRCS, District Conservationist USDA Soils Conservation Service 1193 S. Brownell Road Ste 35 Williston, VT 05495 Tom Bushey, District Supervisor, N.R.C.D. - 48 Bushey Road Shelburne, VT 05482 County Forester, Agency of Natural Resources I I I West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 John M. Austin, Dept. of Fish & Wildlife Agency of Natural Resources 5 Perry Street, Suite 40 Barre, VT 05641-4266 1005-5.wpd Page 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 94C1005-5 Burlington Free Press/Classified Ad Section 191 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 John Becker/Vt. Dept. of Public Service 112 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 Green Mountain Power Corporation 163 Acorn Lane Colchester, VT 05446 Michael Russom/Vermont Gas Systems PO Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402 Division for Historic Preservation National Life Building, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620 James B. McCarthy, Engineering Services Vtrans - One National Life Drive, Drawer 33 Montpelier, VT 05633 Marian White, Policy Analyst Dept. of Agriculture, Food & Markets 116 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2901 Dan Gaherty/Efficiency Vermont 255 South Champlain Street Burlington, VT 05401 Michael Barsotti, Water Quality Director Champlain Water District 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 ADJOINING LANDOWNERS On File at District Commission Office Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 8°d day of June, 2006. i 4aarbaraC4ady,Distnic ffi Chief Cl AAct250\ADM1N\CS\4C 1005-5.wpd State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD June 7, 2006 Munson Earth Moving Corp. 29 Colton Place Williston VT 05495 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division Essex Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695 Telephone: (802) 879-5656 RE: WW-4-2638, Meadowlands Business Complex construct a 50,000 square foot commercial building on Lot #2 with a maximum of 70 employees, 472 Meadowland Drive, South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Applicant: We received your completed application for the above referenced project on June 1, 2006, including a fee of $283.50 paid by check #19640. Under the performance standards for this program, we have a maximum of 45 days of "in-house" time to review your application. If we require further information from you to make a decision, the time until we receive it is not included in the in-house performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 45 in-house days, please contact this office. We have forwarded the information contained in your application to the Information Specialist for this region. A Project Review Sheet will be sent to you indicating other state agencies and departments you should contact regarding additional permits or approvals you may need under their programs. If you have not already done so, you should also check with town officials about any necessary town permits. For the Division of Wastewater Management 4� &LC", letL � Ernestine Chevrier Regional Office Coordinator cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Scott Homsted O'Brien Brothers Agency Inc. I TYPICAL ENTRANCE NORTH ELEVATION m 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, VT 05452 LOLamoureux & Dickinson - Consulting Engineers, Inc. FILE COPY May 26, 2006 Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407 RE: Meadowland Park Lot #2 Dear Patrick, Tel (802) 878-445o Fax (802) 878-3135 Email: mail@LDengineering As requested, we have prepared the following traffic impact study for a 10,000 s.f. general office building and a 40,000 s.f light industrial building being proposed for construction on Lot #2 in the Meadowland Business Park. We have based the following study on the square footage shown on the site plan (dated 5/23/06) provided by Krebs & Lansing, the site engineer. To meet the Act 250 permit condition for Meadowland Business Park, this traffic study estimates the amount of traffic this Project will generate, analyzes the impact that traffic will have on the Hinesburg Road (VT Route 116) / Meadowland Drive intersection and identifies whether any improvements are needed at this intersection. These calculations and analyses are presented in the following sections. Project -Generated Trips The trip generation of this Project was estimated using trip generation data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) for the general office building and general light industrial land -use categories. The following table shows the resulting weekday vehicular trip ends (vte) predicted to be generated by this project. A.M. P.M. Peak Hour Peak Hour vte/hour vte/hour Enter 47 8 Exit 6 47 Total 53 55 All project trips will access the project site from the Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Drive intersection. The directional patterns of the new project trips were based on existing patterns of traffic observed during counts previously conducted by this office at the Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Drive intersection. The resulting distribution of project trips is shown in Figure 1. r Civil Environmental Transportation Planning Landscape Architecture Land Surveying Meadowland Park Lot #2 May 26, 2006 Page 2 Background Traffic Volumes Background traffic data for the Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Drive intersection was obtained from traffic counts performed by both the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) and this office. Average daily traffic volume data for Hinesburg Road (VT Route 116) was obtained from an automatic traffic recorder (ATR) count performed by VTrans at Station D-124 located approximately 3/4 of a mile north of Meadowland Drive. This count provided 2004 average daily volumes, which were then projected to 2006 volumes using growth rate factors published by VTrans. A peak hour turning movement count (TMC) was performed by this office on October 16 &17, 2002 at the Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Drive intersection. This count was performed during both the morning and afternoon peak hour periods and was used to determine the amount of traffic and the directional splits from the existing businesses (Lane Press and Dynapower Corp.) on Meadowland Drive. After this count was conducted, an office building was constructed and is now fully occupied on Lot #4 and a church is permitted for construction on Lot #11 of Meadowland Park. Using information from the traffic studies prepared for Lots #4 and #11, traffic volumes for this office building were added to the traffic count volumes to develop estimates of current background traffic volumes at the Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Drive intersection for this project. Accepted engineering practice is to analyze future traffic conditions using what is called the design hour volume or DHV. The DHV is defined as the 30' highest hour of traffic volumes occurring on an annual basis. On Hinesburg Road at Meadowland Drive, both the ATR and TMC counts indicate a higher peak hour of traffic in the morning peak (as opposed to the afternoon). Based on that, the DHV's used in the following analyses were calculated using the morning peak hour volumes. Afternoon peak hour volumes were similarly adjusted, but remain less than the morning DHV's. Figures 2-5 illustrate the resulting no - build and build DHV's used in the following analyses. Traffic Congestion Levels of service (LOS) at two-way stop control (TWSC) intersections are determined by the average control delay on the minor street approach(s); measured in seconds per vehicle. The LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections are shown in the following table: LOS Avg. Delay A <10 B s15 C s25 D <35 E s50 F >50 Historically, the LOS E/F threshold of 50 seconds average delay per vehicle has been used to define the limit of acceptable traffic congestion conditions at TWSC intersections. It should be noted that TWSC Meadowland Park Lot #2 May 26, 2006 Page 3 intersections which are located on high -volume major roadways almost always experience long delays on the side street left -turn movement(s). This is because those movements have the lowest priority, and must yield to the major street traffic (which in turn essentially experiences little or no delay). Unlike other intersections (signalized, roundabouts and multi -way stop), overall intersection delay is not calculated at TWSC intersections. This Project's impact on future levels of service and average delays was analyzed by performing both no - build and build capacity analyses, and comparing the results of the two sets of analyses. All analyses were performed using existing geometric conditions which include exclusive southbound left -turn and northbound right -turn lanes which were installed on Hinesburg Road for Meadowland Park. Meadowland Drive also has separate left- and right -turn lanes for traffic exiting the park. The following tables present the results of those analyses. The letter denotes the level of service, and the following number in parentheses represents the corresponding average delay in seconds per vehicle. Intersection Approach - Movement Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Dr. Hinesburg Road - SB LT Meadowland Drive - WB LT Meadowland Drive - WB RT 2006 AM (DHV) No -Build Build (Background) I (With -Project) A (10) A (10) C (23) D (27) B (14) B (14) Intersection 2006 PM (DHV) Approach - Movement Background Build Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Dr. Hinesburg Road - SB LT A (8) A (8) Meadowland Drive - WB LT C (16) C (17) Meadowland Drive - WB RT B (11) B (11) As part of the approval for Meadowland Park, the Vermont Agency of Transportation requested that traffic signal warrants be evaluated for the Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Drive intersection each time a lot is developed. Using 2006 average weekday build (with project) traffic volumes, it was determined that the peak -hour and four-hour traffic signal warrants were not satisfied. In these analyses, right -turns exiting the Meadowland Drive approach were deducted and that approach treated as a single -lane approach, as per Section 4C-01 of the MUTCD (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices). With that, the peak hour left -turn volume exiting Meadowland Drive, with this project included, is estimated to equal 11 vph during the a.m. peak and 32vph during the p.m. peak. This is considerably below the minimum threshold volumes of 60 and 75 vph needed to satisfy the four-hour and peak -hour warrants, at 70% of their normal values (the posted speed limit is 40 mph and prevailing speeds exceed that), respectively. Based on the above levels of service and the results of the signal warrant examination, it is } Meadowland Park Lot #2 May 26, 2006 Page 4 our opinion that the additional traffic generated by this project will not warrant signalization of the Hinesburg Road / Meadowland Drive intersection. Conclusion We conclude, based on the foregoing analyses, that the proposed office and general light industrial buildings proposed for construction on Lot #2 will not create adverse traffic congestion conditions on the surrounding roads and intersections. Further, we are of the opinion that the existing roadways and intersections serving Meadowland Park have adequate capacity, and do not require specific major improvements such as traffic signals to accommodate this project. Should you have any questions concerning the above or if additional information is desired, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, ( � 4 , C� Jody Carriere, P.E., PTOE P:\2006\06057\trafrpt.wpd ATTACHMENT A Turning Movement Figures VT Route 116 0 39 � y R 5 Meadowland Drive ft 1 T T 0 8 AM Project Trips VT Route 116 0 7 y V is 40 Meadowland Drive IC 7 T T 0 1 PM Project Trips Figure 1 P:\2006\06057\trafnet.gpw 05/26/06 Figure 2 PA2006\06057Wafnet.gpw 05/26/06 VT Route H 6 155 186 y v R 93 Meadowland Drive fC 11 T 21 620 37 2006 Build AM DHV VT Route 116 166 186 � y K 93 Meadowland Drive le 11 T ;Ip 664 37 2011 Build AM DHV Figure 3 P:\2006\0605Ttrafnet.gpw 05/26/06 VT Route H6 496 44 y v R 157 Meadowland Drive IC 25 T � 220 6 2006 No -Build PM DHV VT Route 116 531 44 y y R 157 Meadowland Drive 1C 25 T 71 216 6 2011 No -Build PM DHV Figure 4 P:\200610605Ttrafnet.gpw 05/26/06 I VT Route 116 496 51 .40 y R 197 Meadowland Drive IC 32 T T 220 7 VT Route 116 2006 Build PM DHV 531 51 y y R 197 Meadowland Drive IC 32 T x 236 7 2011 Build PM DHV Figure 5 P:\2006\0605Ttrafnet.gpw 05/26/06 ATTACHMENT B Intersection Capacity Calculations HCS2000: UnF')nalized Intersections Relea 14.1d ---TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. Carriere Agency/Co.: L&D Date Performed: 3/16/2006 Analysis Time Period: AM DHV Intersection: VT 116 / Meadowland Dr. Jurisdiction: South Burlington Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2006 Project ID: With Lot #2 Project East/West Street: Meadowland Drive North/South Street: VT Route 116 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 1.00 Volume -- ------ 620 37 8 1 ___ ----- 186 -------- 155 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 620 37 186 155 Percent Heavy Vehicles __ __ 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? -------- No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound ---------- Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 11 93 — Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 93 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SE Westbound Eastbound 1 4 7 8 9 I 10 11 L L R I 186 11. 93 940 178 492 0.20 0.06 0.19 0.74 0.20 0.70 9.8 26.6 14.0 A D B 15.3 C 12 HCS2000: Uns )realized Intersections Relea )4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. Carriere Agency/Co.: L&D Date Performed: 3/16/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM DHV Intersection: VT 116 / Meadowland Dr. Jurisdiction: South Burlington Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2006 Project ID: With Lot #2 Project East/West Street: Meadowland Drive North/South Street: VT Route 116 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 220 7 51 496 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 220 7 51 496 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 32 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 32 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Percent Grade M 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 197 1.00 197 0 N Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 I 7 8 9 10 11 L L R 51 32 197 1353 335 825 0.04 0.10 0.24 0.12 0.32 0.94 7.8 16.9 10.7 A C B 11.6 B 12 ATTACHMENT C Four -Hour and Peak -Hour Volume Traffic Signal Warrants 2003 Edition Page 4C-5 d > 500 U O 400 wCE ww ��- 0- 300 U) fr W z75 D 200 —7O 100 W 2 C'3 2 Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four -Hour Vehicular Volume I 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE i1 LANE & 1(LANE *115 *80 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 MAJOR STREET —TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) "Note: 115 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes and 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane. Figure 4C-2. Warrant 2, Four -Hour Vehicular Volume (70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET) 2 400 > 2 Q 300 �O ww W W ¢w U) W 200 07- OD ZJ 2 O> 100 n W 2 C'3 2 i2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE 1 LANE & 1 LANE 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 MAJOR STREET —TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note: 80 vph applies as the lower thresho volume for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes an 60 vpfi�applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane. 80 60 M November 2003 Sect. 4C.04 2003 Edition Page 4C-7 Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour = 600 d = 500 Q 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES w 0 400 IL 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE U) w 300 m Og 1 LANE & 1 LANE � 2 O 200 W 100 S C7 2 MAJOR STREET —TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane. *150 *100 Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET) U 400 �Q w0 cr- C 300 I— Q Irw 0 2 200 _ J �0 > CC 100 w C3 S 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LAN' — 1 1 2 OR MORE LAAN--ES & 1 LANE (�1 LANE & 1 LANE '100 '75 UUV /uu auU auu IUuu 11UU 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET —TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes and 5 v h pplies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane. November 2003 Sect. 4C.06 SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802) 846-41o6 June 7, 2oo6 John Jaeger South Burlington Realty PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: 472 Meadowland Drive Dear Mr. Jaeger: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 June 7, 2oo6 Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Agency PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: 472 Meadowland Drive Dear Mr. O'Brien: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on June 6, 20o6 (effective 6/6/o6). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 18o days (must be submitted by December i 2oo6) of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, 4CU V� Betsy cDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT 70051820 0004 3158 0185 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON �D Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to ever been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Up nrson recceii t of r body notice of a earing d having the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the peal to appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: �-'l • ���(��� �(�� NAME MAILING ADDRESS C-Mq f120 & —, ucf (1G CA oj� s wo T3c,k-i1� Sa'k t .14A, vi� � S yu3 1 c-S-Yw 0-y PROJECT OF INTEREST /qzs 4dyc"f- j SAAo r IL4RsS 0 ✓5sh' r'ql) L-t i31� s ► ►,►,P � s 'P �I .�t /� e) 6 Cc - (A)LITO %t" <,- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to ever been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3) eUp nrson reccei t of r body notice of a earing d having the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the peal to appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: 6 A-o NAME MAILING ADDRESS e ism d�i�irr� r/7 4d('e� Kam{ 3'0 .67v, V(- 03'� C'3 RE WE - MuMn /Y 14, e-a� ,vT Or? JS Ys2 PROJECT OF INTEREST log- ��►� ��- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon recei t of otice of a n having the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the peal to appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE; Z4 zz� f NAME nnAii lKlf-- Ar%mrlP -- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD \drb\sub\munson\prelim final obrien DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: May 19, 2006 Application received: May 9, 2006 PUD- 472 Meadowland Drive PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD-06-33 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-06-34 Agenda # 8 Meeting Date: June 6, 2006 Applicant Owner O O'Brien Brothers Partnership Munson Earth Moving Corp PO Box 2184 85 Shunpike Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Williston, VT 05495 Engineer Ian Jewkes Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Location Ma Property Information Tax Parcel 1155-00472-C Hinesburg Road North View Protection overlay District 8.13 acres CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\prelim final obrien O'Brien Brothers Partnership, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking preliminary and final plat plan review for a planned unit development consisting of a 50,000 sq. ft. contractor or building trade facility, 472 Meadowland Drive. The applicant underwent sketch plan review on April 18th (minutes attached). Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on May 9, 2006 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements 10 Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 3 acres 8.13 acres Max. Density n/a n/a Max. Building Covers e 30% 14.3% Max. Overall Coverage 50% 38.4% Min. Front Setback 50 ft. 50 ft. Min. Side Setback 35 ft. >35 ft. Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. 200 ft. Max. Building Height 35 ft. 35 ft Front Yard Coverage 30% 14.9% n/a SUBDIVISION CRITERIA zoning compliance no residential units proposed Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. The entire meadowland Business Park has been preliminarily approved for water allocation. However, the applicant shall still adhere to the comments of the South Burlington Water Department regarding this proposal. 1. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the South Burlington Water Department as dated May 18, 2006. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\prelim final obrien According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The original subdivision received a 51,272 gpd sewer allocation which is still in effect. TO date there is 48,380 gpd available. 2. The applicant shall receive sewer allocation prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The applicant has submitted a grading and erosion control plans which will sufficiently prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating adverse conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 3. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading of the site shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. This issue was previously addressed to the satisfaction of staff and the applicant. Access to this property is proposed via one (1) 24' drive off of Meadowland Drive. The access drive will split and access two parking areas. The westerly side will serve as parking for some staff and customers to the site. The easterly side will service delivery trucks and a limited amount of parking. Staff finds this sufficient for the proposed use. The areas do not connect at the southern edge of the property. Staff has consulted with the Fire Chief on this matter and it has been resolved to his satisfaction. A 20' fire lane will be provided for emergency access at this area of the building. Staff agrees with the applicant that it is not prudent to connect the areas as passenger vehicles may be tempted to access the easterly side of the building and come into conflict with commercial vehicles. According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, the 50,000 square feet of contractor or building trade facility is estimated to generate 22 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The applicant has estimated 50 PM peak hour trip ends and would like approval for such. Staff finds this acceptable. Calculation #3c of the September 10, 1996 subdivision approval for the business park required that "prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Rte 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City." (Swift Street Extension is now known as Meadowland Drive). 4. Prior to issuance of the zoning permit, the applicant shall submit an updated signal warrant analysis for the Route 116/Meadowland Dr. intersection. If a signal is warranted, the applicant shall install the signal prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\prelim final obrien 5. The Board grants the applicant 50 PM peak hour trip ends for the subject property. The applicant shall pay traffic impact fees based on this number. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The subject property contains identified Class II wetlands. However, neither the parking areas nor the building encroach upon these wetlands or their respective buffers. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. According to Section 6.04(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Industrial -Open Space 10 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and Burlington International Airport. The 10 District regulations and standards are intended to allow high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open character of the district, minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and enhance the visual quality of approaches to the City while providing suitable locations for employment and business growth. The location and architectural design of buildings in a manner that preserves these qualities is strongly encouraged. Staff feels the proposed project is in compliance with the stated purpose of the 10 District, as outlined in the Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. There are significant portions of open space running along the southern portions of the property, so staff feels this requirement is met. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memo dated May 31, 2006. 6. The applicant shall adhere to the conditions of the SBFD as per the memo dated May 31, 2006. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the southern and eastern side of the proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian and recreation traffic through the property. However, staff suggests that this is the most appropriate time to move the easement to the west so as to keep it out of the wetland buffer. The CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\prelim final obrien South Burlington Recreation Department concurs with this. While no construction of the path is planned at this time, it will facilitate the process at a later date. 7. The recreational path easement should be relocated further west so as to avoid the Class 111 wetland buffer. 8. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The subdivision plans for the entire Meadowland Business Park show details on street utilities, lighting, and stormwater management. These have been approved by the City Engineer, so they are acceptable for the proposed project. The applicant has submitted an adequate lighting point by point plan for the proposed project which meets the requirements in Appendices A.9 and A.10 of the Land Development Regulations. In addition, the applicant has submitted exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the proposed lighting on the subject parcel. The proposed lighting fixtures shall be in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. 9. The lighting fixtures shall be revised to be in compliance with Appendix D of the SBLDR. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed development of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the southern and eastern side of the proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian and recreation traffic through the property. According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the 50,000 square feet of contractor or building trade facility will require 25 spaces plus one space for each employee. The number of employees is unknown at this time. As the applicant is proposing 90 parking spaces, the site shall be limited to 65 employees. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\prelim final obrien 10. The site shall be limited to no more than 65 employees. If at any time the collective businesses on the site employ more than that number, the applicant shall either provide additional parking or return to the Board to request a parking waiver. According to Table 13-7 of the Land Development Regulations, a property with 90 parking spaces requires four (4) handicapped -accessible parking spaces. The plans depict four handicapped - accessible spaces. The dimensions of the proposed parking areas appear to meet the requirements in Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is depicted on the plans. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. All of the proposed parking is located to the side of the building. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The height of the proposed building is in compliance with the SBLDR. The proposed project is located in a business park in a area where industrial uses exists, so staff feels the scale of the proposed building is compatible with existing buildings in the area. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant has submitted elevations of the proposed building. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant has submitted elevations of the proposed building In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\prelim final obrien of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Because the project is in a large lot, industrial area, staff does not feel access to adjacent properties is necessary. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans show dumpsters to be typical of each unit. Those dumpsters appear to be adequately screened. Landscaping and Screening Requirements Based on the cost projections submitted by the applicant for this property, the minimum landscaping costs are $22,500. The applicant has submitted a landscaping budget which exceeds this minimum requirement. 11. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the South Burlington City Arborist as per his memo dated May 19, 2006. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area with twenty-eight (28) or more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. All interior and perimeter planting shall be protected by curbing. Interior planted islands shall have a minimum dimension of six (6) feet on any one side, and shall have a minimum square footage of sixty (60) feet. Large islands are encouraged. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans depict two snow storage areas. The snow storage area shown to the northeast of the property conflicts with the pedestrian easement. This area shall be moved or otherwise altered so as not to conflict with the pedestrian easement. 12. The snow storage area shown to the northeast of the property shall be revised so as not to conflict with the pedestrian easement. Pursuant to Section 13.06(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any utility cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\prelim final obrien 13. The plans shall be revised to depict any utility cabinets on the site as effectively screened View Protection Zone The subject property is located within the Hinesburg Road -North Scenic View Protection Overlay District and thus subject to Section 10.03(H) of the SBLDR. Specifically, no part of any structure within the zone shall exceed an elevation of 393.5 feet above mean sea level plus 5.8 feet for each 1000 feet that said part of said structure is horizontally distant from the Hinesburg Road -North View Protection Zone Base Line shown on the Scenic View Protections Overlay District Map. Other The South Burlington Director of Public works reviewed the previously submitted plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated June 2, 2006 (attached). 14. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the South Burlington Director of Public Works as per his memo of June 2, 2006. The subject property is located within the Industrial Open Space District and as such shall be subject to Section 6.04(F) and 6.05 of the SBLDR. All lots of three acres or more, an open space buffer strip no less than two hundred (200) feet in width shall be maintained along the boundary of the SEQ district. The proposed building is exactly 200 feet from the SEQ boundary. At the discretion of the Development Review Board, the buffer strip either shall be left in its open, natural condition or shall be required to be landscaped in accordance with the standards in Section 3.06(I) to provide appropriate screening of proposed uses from adjacent residential properties. This property does abut residential properties. At this time, the applicant is proposing a significantly sized landscaping berm to be placed at the corner most adjacent to those residential properties. The berm is proposed to be 15 feet in height at its highest point and roughly 160 feet in length. At the sketch plan hearing, the Development Review Board suggested that staff explore a set of conditions originally proposed for a property on site. Staff has examined these conditions and worked with the applicant to compose a reasonable set of conditions on the property: 15. a) The use of "Jake Brakes" by any vehicle going to or from the subject property on Meadowland Drive is prohibited. The applicant shall advise all drivers of this. b) There shall be no idling of diesel trucks for periods in excess of five (5) minutes on the subject property. c) There shall be no refrigerated trucks stored on the subject property. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\prelim final obrien d) The restrictions on scheduled truck vehicle trip ends on the subject property shall be as follows: 12:00 A.M - 5:59A.M. 6:00 A.M. — 11:00 P.M 11:01 P.M — 11:59 P.M. Monday no truck operations no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends Tuesday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends vehicle trip ends Wednesday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends vehicle trip ends Thursday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends vehicle trip ends Friday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends vehicle trip ends Saturday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions no truck operations vehicle trip ends 6:00 A.M - 12:00 P.M no trucking operations 12:01 P.M — 11:59 P.M. ISunday I no truck operations I no truck operations I no truck operations The Board shall allow exception for emergency cases where it is not prudent, either for reasons of safety or substantial financial impact, to wait until such a time where truck traffic would be allowed. For the purposes of clarifying the Board's intent, this shall include, as example, emergency service calls and deliveries which have been delayed due to poor weather or other hazard which has impacted traffic in the region. The DRB originally suggested that there shall be no use of a "back-up beeper" on any vehicle on the subject property between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. However, after sufficient research into local and state traffic and transportation law and code, staff does not advise implementing this condition. The potential safety and financial risk is too great. Staff recommends that the South Burlington Development Review Board approve Preliminary Plat application #SD-06-33 and Final Plat application #SD-06-34 subject to the conditional items listed above. Respectfully submitted, Cathya6fi LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Munson Earth Moving, property owner O'Brien Brothers Partnership, applicant South Burlington Fire Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4110 May 31, 2006 Ms. Juli Beth Hines, Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: O'Brian Brothers Partnership 472 Meadowland Drive Dear Juli: I have reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of the proposed commercial building at 472 Meadowland Drive. I have also spoken with the developer Patrick O'Brian relative to the project. I have the following recommendations: 1. Compliance with all requirements of Vermont Division of Fire Safety codes and standards. 2. Automatic sprinklers and alarm system as required by Vermont Division of Safety. 3. Fire Department Sprinkler Connection location to be specified by SBFD. 4. Fire Alarm panel and enunciator location to be specified by SBFD. 5. Provide 24 hour per day off -site (central station) monitoring of all fire alarm and protection systems. 6. Provide an emergency key box, location to be specified by SBFD. 7. If an elevator is proposed the elevator car(s) to be sized large enough to accommodate an ambulance stretcher in the flat position. 8. Number and location of fire hydrants to be determined by the South Burlington Water Department. Actual final spotting of said hydrants to be done jointly with SBFD. 9. Drive around access is not necessary however in speaking with the developer he is willing to install an emergency access point at the rear of the building either using pavement or brick/grass pavers. Page - 2 At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves forward additional items may surface which can be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the developer and the Vermont Division of Fire. Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Douglas S. Brent Fire Chief Cathyann LaRose From: Bruce Hoar [sbpwbkh@adelphia.net] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 10:02 AM To: Cathy Larose Subject: DRB Comments 6-2-06 South Burlington Public Works 575 DOR SET STREET SOUTH BURLNGTGN, VEF MONT 05403 TEL(002)•7 61 FAA (802)658-7976 Of Ha -E. I rA tANcIVn.L see Fo: Cathy Larose, Associate Planner =r om: Bruce K. Hoar, Director of Public Works Re: DRB Comments >ketch Plan #SD-06-28, Leslie Williams here needs to be a crosswalks added to the plan to connect the sidewalks and rec path. \II pavement markings to be durable, inlaid tape or vinyl. \II signage to be provided. iandicap crossings to be marked with truncated domes. Nhat is happening with existing home sewer connection? iammer Head configuration is not adequate, needs to be moved away from driveways. Ceep road width constant at 24'. Jo private access to lot one over city ROW. Nhy bike path by others? Jot shown on sketch but no brick in manholes. 'avement thickness to be 4". Hater to be reviewed by SBWD >anitary sewer pump station to be reviewed by WPCD. 'reliminary plat #SD-06-30 and Final plat #SD-06-31, Super -Temp Wire&Cable Jo bricks in any type of ManholPc nr Catch basins that will be turned over to the city. Ireliminary plat #SD-06-33 and Final plat #SD-06-34, O'Brien Brothers Jo bricks in any type of Manholes or Catch basins that will be turned over to the city. ,urb reveal for city is 7". Plans show detail for 6". 5/2/2006 r1 May 18, 2006 Mr. Scott Homsted Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 RE: 472 Meadowland Drive Meadowlands business Complex Dear Scott: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. The attached Application for Water Allocation must be completed and returned to the South Burlington Water Department as soon as possible. As your project continues, the Application for Water Allocation will need final approval from this Department, which will be contingent upon available water storage capabilities within the City. Current water distribution system upgrades have been substantially completed that should allow for the construction of your project, pending approval of all other local and State requirements. 2. Based upon the final water allocation request, water service fees shall be applied to the project based on the current Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council, and therefore subject to change prior to completion of the project. 3. All construction drawings and plans shall have a note saying "All water line and related work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District, the City of South Burlington Colchester Fire District # 1 and the Village of Jericho, henceforth the "CWD Specification." 4. All water installation work and water distribution material must comply with the "CWD Specifications". Details for this project must be the same as those within the above referenced CWD Specifications. 5. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public water system shall be protected with a backflow prevention assembly, and an appropriate thermal expansion system in compliance with the Ordinance For The Control Of Cross Connections Within The Water System Of the City Of South Burlington, henceforth the "Backflow Ordinance." Please contact this department for more information on backflow protection devices. 6. The above referenced CWD Specifications state that no water lines shall be installed after November 15 or before April I without prior approval of the Superintendent. The Superintendent may restrict work before November 15 and after April 1 during adverse weather conditions. 7. Access must be provided to the Department for those curb stops located outside the City ROW for disconnecting service to delinquent accounts provided that the City of South Burlington follows the requirements set forth in State Statute Title 24 V.S.A. Chapter]29, Uniform Water and Sewer Disconnect. 8. Eight -inch and larger Ductile Iron (DI) water pipe shall have no less than three (3) brass wedges installed at each joint. Bury depth to the new main shall be six feet (6') to the top of the pipe. 9. Mechanical joint restraints with twist off nuts shall be EBAA or Sigma, or a Department approved equal grip ring. 10. Fire hydrant assemblies shall consist of an anchor tee connected directly to a six-inch RW gate valve, the appropriate length of 6" DI pipe, the fire hydrant, and appropriate thrust block. All hydrants shall meet the aforementioned CWD Specifications, and a hydrant flag shall be supplied with each hydrant. Hydrant shall have all drains plugged prior to installation. Note: Waterous fire hydrants must be installed with a "Boston Operating Nut." 11. Corporations shall be Mueller B-25008 or Cambridge brass. Curb stops shall be Mueller B-25209 or Cambridge brass. All brass unions and adapters shall be Mueller or Cambridge brass. 12. No underground utility shall be installed within four feet from the water main on either side, from the top of the main to the finish grade, with the exception of storm sewer and sanitary sewer as stated in the above referenced Specifications. Generally, trees shall not be placed over any water main or service line, nor placed within 20' of any appurtenance, including fire hydrants. 13. The SBWD shall be sent any future hard copy plans involving this project for review. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in the above referenced Specifications. 14. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances, water line crossings, and testing. 15. Further review changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. 16. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, Jay Nadeau Superintendent CC. Cathyann LaRose Doug Brent Bruce Hoar Plan Reviews: 472 Meadowland Dr Lot 2 Meadowland Industrial Park— M14&tilr7`�iCn 5/19/06 Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Plan looks pretty good overall with 2 minor recommendations: 1. White or Black Spruce may be a better choice for this site due to heavy, poorly drained soils 2. Pruning should be restricted to dead, broken or dieing limbs of newly planted trees I q.. MEADOWLANDS BUSINESS COMPLEX LOT 2 MEAD 0W AND IND USTRIAL PARK 472 MFADOHILAND DRIVE SO UTH B URLINGTON, TVERMONT INDEX. Sheet I Site Plan Sheet 2 Utility Plan Sheet 3 Lighting Plan Sheet 4 Landscape Plan Sheet D-1 Details Sheet D-2 Details Sheet D-3 Details RFCEIV ED MAY o 9 ?006 City of so"UM17 9t0/1 KRZSS & LANSINC 164 Wazn Street acts M y Z 2006 Colchester Consulting_ ProjL t 05145 row.>., Engxiaeers Inc. Vermont 05446 802-878-037S Cb Lot 7 \ \ Lot 10 Existing el- MTC Ex. SMH .4Q,��� -j I \ Ex. SMH ,f5 Sammer ice ✓Oktt 14-tum Nml JJB. 49' Rim=J4a.00' \ v. in 06 JJ1. VOL 387 P.4J9 /n — C Inv. in JJO. Bs Ex. SMH ,4 2 H 14 Inv out JJO.B/ Rim=JJ9.751 5'�----'s'"•� Ex. SMp4 N � B' In, in=JJ2 !' Rim=J41. 42' New 50',20' 8" /n v. in=JJ202' BO' ROW A akWd —tra M- s 8" Inv. out=JJ! 9 �„ Ines JJ2.70' n6`ur �taYvnDfn : s _ -- � ex. 8" PVC sew - - _ _ ® Naw dpxtory BQ- - - - - adowla e ... _ ahn ..i - --lap- - ! _e. ma - f +oX, :. \• E. 24'AD5 `'•. Ewiehn „ .. :-.. - ......g4 3`1� �---�" 4orr 24 g..r(' e,rrmg culvert g o I hr�dne _- 23743• L f12.24 au ,R-540.15 °, " — � •�� y/ I I N w ao,rwau I / I As— se , --CLASS aeroft _. \ = 1 14 / I Lot 1 / T r r Illl'1 NM corer rcrn,� Munson Earth Moong Corp. / �` 0� ! _•-� llll. I /� /t f-mg. r'/ .a Fa/. • � I Existing Pond / H I � � ;�. I ', Location Mao I, I owner Information: Applicant Information: �.. Munson Eorth Moon 9 Corp Osrien Brothers Agency Inc. BS Shunpike Rood P.O. Box 2/84 W 1iston, VT 05495 South Burlington, VT 05403 _ ;h Begh n.. / J Areas Propos - b�y /d'nq lll/ iinir -t-n rota/ area = 8.00 acres J44480 ft. (416' 8" by 130-) P l... 1. � Ill 1 9 � ( sq. % / 50, co0 rq. f< - _ d / / A 1 �A Zoning' Industrial and Open Space Zoning District rV./ Lot Comrade Jt.S5' a / # CLASS // Wet/ands aapatif r snrxe Ana s Maw. Allowed Refer to al A-P't'•STr"`'• l// 1 1 Cvir Use Deleon o�itarnNo. Erarira eu/dh o aL os NIA l -' `^/.. '; �•.. vodr unR. ( 1 Exhrh Povemurr 0 sr Os N A 2001-J98 dated 11/1/02 for Pmsnhm ks 9.I8m rt. 1591 7as addlelonal fnformct/an. rota co fJ.;eae al. .1G4s Jos No new disturbance h / \�i v� f •3 t l /�' // / so' I of Class U wet/ands "•paw bun4. , 1 or wetland buffer F t co zR9s Proposed. our sr 1 Porkino G ftft 40, 000 s . R. Wbrehouse /stnbutian I q /b• /ConFroetor • 1 space/1, 000 sq.R = 20 spaces 1Q 000 sR ft Office space a .I5 spaces/1, 000 sq. ft. 15 spaces /- rota/ Spaces Required = 55 spaces111 /�+-rN .I�Proposed� `, I Parkin 9 0ces 90 (Incl./4 hand/copped) 1 �/\\\ \\\\\\ . / / SLmmar /cep ✓pint Ventura Legend l JB71.4J9 -- Su-y-ft/Pant f 1I/If,1 f F/n. pad RECEIVED ---- Prpe eyLmoorRhhrofw,y f 70 wag I "1 In II I I , II II —JJ4 a rermy Bound contour /!IV_ �.47 ll� ����I',1'��I III � ® eerms>wwe-monnwe one 1 j awmd p �d l �l1 // 1 /� 1 i i I I I I p E arw9 catch bosn \ / zb &e v ry / / /� _ -1 �-•ri r Enithg sewer /ne _ - , /� ly , I IIII MAY 0 9 2006 // II R I I II III 1 _ _ _ _ - - _ Eating wage me 1101I 'frill I I „�`^ 3 w D4 aiSt'r nxa'anr/wore-'V/� Notes: °d Yf V O. Bur ing n :wwv, W.9 f od i e C1Q nnepr wo }-- / \\ \ + ....: I I , \ I:1 lF� v �lta� / i /� .E. _ _ _ _ r. tnb; h not o eorere r ear X /a.. mo.a o. nor o a -----».------ New rshae grad .✓' 't/f\\\ \! \ \;\\\\\ \ �'��t \\\ 1 ^ /f �3 / c--" '//Deal /j 1 heed ateadb dasai ee Am*-ybh&,M,, Prot•by rw l L� `�olio / / / 0-adtir En abred a 4 New /ummrire 9 h. say APa K - L 1ec.rded h me JB6 � �.- ---� rill l Page se in me rrcy ofsotr^ 6ruthgroa Lone weaorra Naw co,t aoua :,rr f-a. ---- -; �-96cmPoo/ E:rtended �/ / --a--a- Now —rat— nmrr lending Detention Ser P / I ntion flood � /// �' ,s'- ..•'/ //% /Illy/ _���,•� -� _� -_' I 0' Ia' 40" 80 r1a' 160' 700" g. . \•\ \. '1.l ///// \\( �_ \ • Ne► dWl /hk r /'/'9I9ut/r! / Petv➢'Ancirg. See Q / - - _ hrae aoand pmd. - .� �._•- �/ UDr JCGIe 14D' •� •� / / \\ \\\\\ \ \ aN Inca Lot Z Mun MO n Corp,rth _ _ — �• ./, ,;,,I,I,I,II rl, 9 _ - FOR PERMIT REVIEW l/aMAcre 9e: 88 (A7 J7 �/jffy ��i/y/ ao ra,ca veaer I ,pew —Moor .dr 655.63 �-sore .adsed Gore aria, mecred Dore _..• \ ,, ' /A✓indova Design dill h Site Plan Dro.n �`,�„-,-�.�."'^`^,,� _ .::..„.„,.,. -^.•._�, v^," `"a ti•,.,_., Homer d' Marie Dubois Checked w amne -= - Vol.179 P.126 Scale 1 40' Meadow/ands Business Comp/ex duns Sse Cefals Rim= ,wwear , . SMH /B - = J4J.01' Date Moy ,t 1006 Lot 2 Meadow/and Industrial Pork Scott d' Roberto Lorry d Gfnerte Penndhgma Brofnord Project 05146 472 Aleadow/and Drive South Burlington, Vermont Vol. 209 P.J26 Vol 211 P.282 AA' FSS & LANSfW Consulting Bngineersx Inc. ..: >B4 Alain Street; Colchester, Vermont 0"4(6 Scott t Roberto Pennington Val. 209 P.J26 Lot 7 Munson Earth Mo ring Corp. New undeground gas ti � ,l ae vAce tsfk tM / Nrt /8 :!.OS N12 -- - f .ntir . M. -_... 'h_j a� /I Val. 211 P.282 Homer S Mone Dubor's V.I. 179 P. 726 Lam _L j "AA .49' /n v. in 331.06 %� ` Inv. in JiQ85 Ex. SMH /2 /nK ouf JJO. BI in=JJ2.21 Rim=JJ� ew .9/N u B" Inv ' n+JU82• , _ B' Inv. in=JJ202' =JJL6t' 8" Inv. out=JJ7.96' a Trot^'� .., �• � � � `S . / ,>, I ,� Caaboer 'aho8 wre w„r� •%"^""M••••"-' � � of eaWft —At s ,.. CLASS // V 1�1 I =d I I' / t\ - iIy yy� I Inv.=J.TSS'./ $ - 3 40' 1111 I Existing Pond I end asetbn II iK jmi - . J I Owner Information: / �lIli '';. 1 1 Munson Ewth Moving Corp. S%lunprlre Rood NO Ap W 1iston, VT 05495 'O o ' 1 Applicant Information: 09. B Brothers Agency Inc. P.O. Box 2/84 South 8unngton, Vr 0540J to' y t CLASS // Wet/ands ro' er m' Areas• l--New sed ascrbn 1 I Rehr to Cond/OR N Uss Determination No. Total area 8.00 acres (J44 480 sq. ft.) 1 2001-J98 doted I ' 11/Y/02 for Zoning., additional information. Industrial and Open Space Zoning 9/strict No new disturbance so, we of Goss // wet/ands Bwe carer.- 1 I or wet/ond buffer 1 proposed. � bLrnr conrrd Pomr IPrg ty Line w Right of 4by —JJ4— £mating ground contour E "sting sewer mcnhote f' Wh g 3cin Lot J yareh bas � Ensr;n wx line SLmmer Ice ,hint ✓enture - - - w - - - - E 'sting ware- line A41. - i / Val JB7 P. 4J9 a isti9n p worst jzpd h +t / wtrr werwr hqa, B / —+--•— Est" Mce mK agr= II See Aetoe � � I r'r�-v�r�r� E,;rmg wove , e III �F— New storm line II I New water bne II II I New ''&rnt IIII I I III 1 I New —it-,newer line/force moire I II ❑ ® New -kh bash, New throat block New underground Nectr underground goo mhed grad.EvLI CO New /ummoxe MAY 0 s 2006 Ciiy of So. Burlington 0' 20' 40' 80' 120' /60' 200' Bar Scale I = 40' FOR PERMIT REVIEW Dare revised 0escnption Ch-*.e Dote Desig AJ Drawn ' FMP/SWN Utility Plan Checked Scale 1' = 40 Meadow/ands Business Complex Date AOb,.x 2006 Lot 2 Meadowland Industrial Pork Pro- ct 05146 472 dleadow/and Drive South Burlington, WmrmGnt XR�BS & LANSING Consulting engineers, Inc. - 2 >6 a Alain Stree4 Colchester, Yerrnont 05446 \\ New directory rive Meodowland D sign 1..�'� ... '1yt�, TYPE O TYPE C / TYPE a I r�rPeA �Q I j / �WON q: n I TYPE E (/ I I ,cTWEA P Propos2d-&i/ding 'rid ore the 11ghnonee p� �416 =B"� by 72BL%_ s d,W b p ot-ca by the new .Wed in foot-candles, as ce/cu/otad by O TYPE a, 50, aaa S ft. Q• ~r v I Lux/con, V2.52A by Cooper Lighting. - ..TYPE E ' 1 M Fl \ ' I � Finished Floor' Contour Illuminance Levels - , Elev. = 34.3.5' I a /0 foot-candle 0.25 foot-candle J P E .y 0.50 foot-candle f ':.p 1.00 that-cond/a.....,..•.•.,.,...•,..,,.,.,.,,...,,.... J ,, t ` 2.00 foot ay ,• O o .EGO foot-candle I Statistical Area Summary Crid r}p&• Horizartol Illuminance of finished grade aid Un/ts• Footcondles Six: lo'-oa spocing L a" 15' Ja" ea' 90' 120' Area Awroge ffiE CbY4P3ta Sa ..........._................._...................... .................._.._. ,CIr PGA TfaN FzA,,uitr3 _`.:......_...............__............ ............... ._...... ..... ....... _,,,..__.__.... .,.......................... ,Y�.xPPV P{�€n.Fgl�ka .._....... AA uai � 6RPgrEact P 'EF fF 'TfAaA irk R[tC FtR laf'Fjsa (J Se•'iatav"a f. fame dip.„aav WNc.alar p Ile Tad F.Un41R m 4P T'it IeP3ENd and pakbtad :P14nunurt' i t}usirq ER a .PoaikM;:2rg 1 itio ',4hiep r:ataff RR;,,g +;rlY pS {.FCMit '4ICa pie.giRq;^ptt oomal LItato', and ri.,nim mjia,q WiYlt nTFSf fFt&SEidl C3 Yt7 a ba]+& RunimaaRx A teEiai:W fT:�3htYYAJf{t paCln 3eTNf3,@n B...kigf.atl / .t Eunkrtum s,akPstar r3Tl star JNEK hrun a p ivkatar dzoYrdar t'imi a rag 3 (Varn PIQM.Gt. 3 ,nix rrla: ^. ttt i{PLn'F3ry R iih ;R itott, F i c ,5araw¢ E3niti'flirfl ANC ,3P..rani.!- We.ahe'. ,I Rd an'.3i' n Slavdard and CBPT"a8f,?)rlT6t APPLICANOM 0,18:aYa'r1 lkaia aCiaWti iilACtkn WN, •tat^h .... ........................ ........... .... ........_........... ............ y,..BBkt'a •a4 :ia:yig�red to "'Oert ivictil Compact 7allaat ti'i)ra ;aiP:E ;011 diG-k.O.il ,nsuY'xas Or m :a :" :vRaamb!Y: C.Usei3-weal! qaa-":Ilse e a or 'S aezaara a>ittlsi ��x, .+k Ta:':dtid {'I4 {g g2r ,eiestg Yigh•!&neperatt n il-ior:kgt -. {P aue i°nn.:uif +*rfro nee. irsg.0 �� ... P�tipuo�Partad S A'narN ;s A xamfie++ranri muolusr, l)a; Ir)ctvrioneP. .01 F01' Main limn Fncrcut. N •i.gnr: 'SAN.:ntprlE, lRJal:t:i",R-Tfif;Tat7 . lea, yMS1Yt;ArfiaEle?a iaila TYPE A Lumorir MAV-2 Cc pact wal Mount 70 +art Yerd-h.VMk . M F--d mrow rnwa Adrd Pke9 .—W qt 1e' TYPE B Lumiere Ocltwood 911 75 —H,, C--t Flarrmcsrt, Snyta Lamp . moon tad ae s: ands- mtranca inn , RPCEIVEM.11:�yFte. i tw �Prd ra,n Glyhr S 0 W Ai.ab Pra uuurn S:ro s'iNm fiiacat Hq°tda WALL M4UNr TYPE C McCraw -Edson Louvered "lard la nett, Yet&-h&id; rich AaJnr &e IJ�ror Lapp et r abgw 7ro ' MAY 0 9 2006 W..d oesadpnga / Daign /A✓ Lighting P/an Drawn /P awn fa /.z / / CKY of SO. BuCi6RCgtw Checked Scale _ ,D" Meodow/ands Business Comp/ex Date Yay4 2" Lot 2 Meodow/and Industrial Park Project 05146 472 Meadow/and Or ae FOR PERMIT REVIEW South Buriaagton, Vermont "YERT & L4,VSINC Consulting Fngineers, Inc. 16!4' Ifain Stree4 Co&Aester, vermon., 0",;(S r� w \ \ Lot 10 Existing e/ec NTC Lot / lL. Summer Ice ✓Dint Venture -- _ _ ✓ol. J87 P. 4J9 - - ao' Pow Bu�n9 Vie* tset trsv------- ; --- -Bd----- /-� _ N .keel r Meodowlorid Drive Es. 7s'AOS �, /,.. ,tft- / „-- _' II rlw \..... - - _= .up `319' r-CLASS ll V 340 Lott Munson Earth Malang Carp. a 1^ 111 i I I i;` l/� / 1 Existing Pond / / l / 4# /io/f r 1 11 ll 1 'Proposed Ai 1219g� ll - ,,1rIllp J � (41s-a-'by 12v� / r 5Oe ft.WO s s -T t �l idt l l Finished E7ev. Ja =rs' - 1 CLASS // Wet/ands �. 111 I 1 Refer to Canditionol l�l ,x Umr 9 ll l 1 , Use Ostaminoticn No 2001-J98 doled I 1I/1/02 for additional information. /:. / k•,; Go t / No new disturbance / P of C/ass tl we8onds or "Hand buffer /•/l 7� % .� � � � � / l / ' %'� ll l Proposed. f New tadM'�ki � awn Scott d Roberto Pennmgtcn Vol. 209 P..M6 Craws to be pruned or directed by Ties to be orrchilect - do not l leader ref plumb Reinforced robber hose __ GuNn9 mot (Guying w✓q J per rsrnporrxy lmdcope i seater r nk t-6 n Planting muturo Shredded bark mu/ch, J, mm. depth FNM grade Cut and remora any -.4 a/ budop boar \ /ism AW 1/J of \\ rootbafl befcre 6, -Patted \ �Ig%trunk untie rgov plont/ng mixture \ \\ - - I Exrstkrg rubgrede �1=1 ^-I l � rree support onch- Lot J /! JT Summ✓d. / e Joint 39 furo /r,, �i li+I, vIII II//I f � r / l 11111 11I II II i / IIA1 1 / nryra 6 ��/"i-17� III11 II II t/ / it l l l i �• // /i� j \Ijil till /or—dPowd / / I I 1 III =,I� Landscaping Schedule / !/ II 1 7 k\\ // i j+ i� nl 1 ', v 0e arisen sr" oLmeze swnaa Ausfnwt Ph,, B-Io' ta/ 24 nr P1-Ngra Larry & Cinette B/olhord Vol. 211 P282 A IT IIIIII �' - `_�- - ,w000e. tea ®A7C3) rks .Pro. b.., Lot/2mun /�t i1 Mon Garth I I j l IJ'1 g �.' 11 I I 1111 Valu a 651 Page 157 7'1/1I111 embx 14 200J Acreage: 8 CO lop [��/ r��T -�+�` �`�`��L /� ��i-� //%/PodJlll,/ Tn�r; `\\,,\ BluePswn4arn B=fO'ta9 J �r. IV— yspn�e 6'-rtou 15 Stom titer / F1aw, tine /a _ / / ' ,niu 'dad J, ca. 4 rc _� --\ - •-. Detention Pond 'n"" / Eostan 1Mrfe Cedar 5' to6 10 ,f -� Additional Landscape Plan, Details, and Cost Schedule / xo• e .*P /hk / —of Pond r/ Homer Marie Dubois Vol. 179 P. 126 Notre• Remora off non-bfodetrodob/e malaria/ from plant pit Tree Planting in Landscape Detail M r.S Owner Information. Munson Earth MOHng Corp. 85 SYtunptke Road Wkl/stan, VT 05495 Anolicont Information: OBrlen Brothers Agency Inc. P. a Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 0540J Areas. - rota area - 800 acres (J48,480 sq. It.) Zoning: Industrial and Open Space Zoning District Legend _ _ S Y emt2t POett - - — Pooprty Lm. or RV( of w y -.r�- E srnq mound —t-oy Enstkrq sew« manna. qp E0,9 f d ant ---- z34 ------ New rnrwred gmd< t Enstmq t- Ensfmq tree - W-.e d d New /ummoirc RECE'V to be provided by Landscape Arch/tact. E MAY 0 9 2006 — — C1f$tEftq REVIEW n9ton Dot. om--bars a.ck.d Dare Design /1AJ Landscape Plon Checked Meadowlands Business Complex D' TO' 40' 90' !70' I6o' 7LYJ" Scale 1' ' �' F= Date MnyJlase Lot 2 Mecdowlond Industrial Park Bar SCole I" = 40' Pro' ct 05146 472 Meadow/ond Drne South Burlington, Vermont .YRLBS LANSING Consulting Bnganeers, tree. � 4 fB41 .Lfasn Stree4 Colchester, Vermont 05,oW Thrust Ext'stir7g water main All water rdoted waneyto be pbn ed h /aa,ow" or, the . Aebs rims abd Ortads -c the /nsrnefew of wbrr /her and oppurtmmees fen ow water Sisson. awned by the Chomp/oh wbtr DiWHct. the City of Sovrn &,fmgtab, and the Wtoge of A.rieba. _ 0. Tapping sleeve and valve by Clow, New 8' water service 4, _U I Mueller or approved equal. Contact Champlain Water District and Wet top shall be installed by persons the Engineer 48 hours prior to tap. approved by Champlain Water District Retail Division and the Engineer, Typical Topping Sleeve and Vclve N. T.S A// water rrofed wank rb be petfom a o oecord eve M the ii-flcar,abs abd Oetods far the /nstalat'an Of Abler lines ma appurtab c it, all wbtr Sprems owned by the Lhomp/ao wbter O,etncL M. City of South Buningten, and the Waage of,bn'cba' test Cote valve and tamper et5 B' switch. Kennedy General ti5 Sprinkler 590E or �tirKlet d B- approved equal 9' Ta domestic supply Ba.*flow Prevention (Abtts Series 709 double check ar B approved equal) City Entrance Sacklow prevention (Abtts Series 709 double check or See mechanical drawings for detahs of approved equal) sprinkler syateen, domestic water must be isolated from. spank/er system with Abtts Series 709 double check or oppromd equal. Bockllow Preventer Schematic N. rs All wale related wank to be pe lbbmed h mcardence with the O.c,fieoNans and Orro/h lb, the mswlatim of Nbter /roes app�ananeee fr ell wbte Sperms Owned by the ahomp/aw fbtr DAtret, the City of South Budmgton, and the wl.ge of Jencha' Note A Frost Noe* shall be o'totled at a wotf morn bands reducer, and eops and feet. abe Undrseur,ed -W Use au q /�-moh rail _7m of pipe abrvm Set gate wdw ov.b s abe. Use re thrust block bwod cqa 6" (152 cm) m Pluq ra french wor J Undsru (ftpko/l� Lsal yalvelDdad End Reducer Note: P/ace J and mJ papMy/ma sheet befweab eek. bt d/ emcee_ rnrosr a/ and pp bo rrtrkhgs to pmwrrt bend Cabrera uho r not oar .r bats fc f firbngt Und'eWrbed sib/ 90',45',22 1/2' or 11 1/4'9end Thrust Block Details N.TS Minimum Area of Beanno Surface of Concrete Thrust Block /in spume feet) SOK CONO/ION SAFE SA` ~ eaW(PgJ ae rm us- dim hen wr hen Yr eve nrr wr creole r see as ens ear w - r u sir 'e°f hen r• en a �r a5 0.5 15 as as LO a5 a5 1.0 1.5 LO a5 Zo 2.5 1511,0 4.0 55 10 1.5 Sound wna. l0000 to to to 0.5 1.5 2.0 l.0 05 JO 40 2.0 to 4.5 6.5 15 ZD /GO 14.07.5 4.0 6. "d gra 4000 1.0 LO 1.0 a5 2.0 0.5 LS 1.0 35 5.0 JD 1.5 6085 SD ZS /J 01&5 too so span read .1000 1.5 25 t5 to 25 .i5 20 1.0 55 7..5 40 20 9.01Jo 7o �JS 027 15o BO die Wed 2OL0 JO 45 25 1.5 SO 70 4o 20 /a515o BO 40 16025 l40 70 Js SS JOo 150 so,? eta, 1,0010 A/rrnwht wrr pmmwe � 2ap P5/ n4aryp ke/ h P J Catch Basin Size Max. Pipe Diameter J' dla 12' 4' &a 24' 5 dip JO 6' die i6 From, and graft LeBaron LF248-2 or equal. LeBaron L'120A if slop, is greater Mon SL ,57-pe a 2l min. Mostld O' ring or butyl rope klma'rhrc boss - Ffrl rant she/ be higher than invert out Wevatim. the carat basin 4, shall be 1b7- than indicated ,n the adpcent r are If the ended m n be of pipes penetrating the catch bosnu/s receded fhisn grohw ro rah --Cast in place cmcret, nse. Use doss B event. (; SOO psi) between cast iron from. and precast concrete catch basin catch basin by Comp, Cn'swoid or equal - AS710 spec. C478-88 4,000 P.SI cmcrete Steel ranfbraM to AS71e Specs - AASH70 H-20 ,be./ load Whteiproof s.a/ with rem-Mrink grout. Flew 24' sump -J/4" to r 1/2" crashed stone u e:rasped mat -al Typical Catch Basin N. r.5 O+T po,wq to moral exaf q to Cmboefo- aloe be po.n unpahrd --aOte to,_A'_g mound eiphNy emb aSNA - M&YA regu/afro+s - rend inn pp i cmo sell river rears Mab J'rno eram.ra,, m 9" 9" here. lw ns coy or standard standard a am m 12T late ane proctor practal canpect as odeatol s I vow ame M n- 'e" 1/J/w• ,Ann rrow ar adred by ; upoor aea.e Me ea.rnre / Ppe (w .loaf m any rot ' 2' ' '11 .hem acres harken moremv eedd damage Prod } I _1- 2" Algr SfAm/aabh mwmliab (fa rrau, wdM ,.ride. Pala, Tear) x , Fr sf_ pp.s uw 1.14' for J1 _ avrred arm. / Lser eons tr oa aloe prow ewhfnhe aPO. 11, d Uedhrreed manna Storm Trench Detail N. r, S A// water rei ted work to be pwAo Wed o oceo-dabce withthe 'Speeiftetboy wd Detodt it, the Inxroaoboab f Abre /roes area ov_tenabcer to, al ebte St temx owned by the 01-piah wbta, District. the City of South BuHhgtm, and the ✓//loge of ✓arch. " O+2' -- paMq to matan sxhfh the Cmbactr shdl be aw0 respabs fsr -Ptyehg paved vend 1b a'5 s - w9/A Wigna y mgalbtko i. t al 6-M moterb Wind --- -toh ab W-as great- than J ir d,onetr, n a standrd 'tallow B' rote,- p,pe she/ orch ,tlumps coy r Facto" pipets /roro no /ass than three 'gab mate .. (AA9fM-r-99) brOss wedges ,nstal/ed Place h t r lifts rid of ea CA phi. -poet - odkated E ;die So Bun. Warr - b Dept Srard6rd') md,d 2' Use e6 send Ayr far 0a4/w AwncAing abd kril/d boot AN _ OWN, sae a 52 MPunanirq or 1' cgwp Undritaron metew c poet una6r ppe Ernawte habch to .whppa-t fivwdw met S' rate alWhian yr i ell. bell, pints end p(oe equaty Typical Water Trench Details N, rs Construction Notes 1. fie Cenfioclor will be responsible !w all construction of water moire, storm and sonitory sewer systems as shown on the plans He will be responsble far off necessary adopters, fittings etc. to make connections to the existing and proposed utilities. fie Contractor shall be responsible for off work shown or implied on the plans andlw referenced in the specifications and permits. The .Contractor shall submit for approw/ by the Engineer all types of matena/s and products used Water Main 1. fie pipe for water main shall be ductile iron class 52 manufactured in accordance with AWWA C151-76, or PVC pressure pipe OR 18 (Schedule BO) AWWA 0900, as noted on the drawings All pipe shall ham push on type pints All lining£ va/ms etc. rho// have mechanical rants. Pipe fittings shall be manufactured by Clow, US Pat Johns-Manw'//e, or approved equal. 2 A// pipe shall be installed In accordance w/AWWA C-600. fie pipe shall be kept free of foreign matter and debris during installation. When the process of pipe laying has stopped any open ends of pipe shall be plugged, flare shall be a minimum of 6'-0' cover over al/ pipe and serwce lines. Any pipe deflection shall not exceed lily (50) percent of recommended manufacturer's maximum deflection. Backe/ materials and procedures shall be as detailed on the drawings fie Contractor shall be responsible for any and al/ sheeting and/or shonhq necessary to comply w/OSHA - VOSHA egulattonm J fie testing of the water man shall consist of the testing of all nseatled pipe, services, hydrants etc. fie testing shall consist a o pressure test !allowed by o leakage test. A// testing shall be done with potable water and ,n the presence of the Engineer fie pressure test consists of molntoning a minimum Memo/ ppe pressure of two hundred (200) pounds per square inch for two (2) hours Fo7ure to had the pressure (+/- 5 psi) for the specified time constitutes failure of the test for the partievior section of ppe. The /eokoge lest shall be conducted for one (1) hour fie time for the leakage test may be included With the time of the pressure test. Oaring the /-*age test the quantity of water necessary to manto,n the testing pressure of the system sho// be measured the leakage shall not exceed the allowable wedges as shown in table 6 AWWA C- 600. Failure of any test section Wd/ necessitate repair ond/w replacement of the foiled section. Working pressure and lest pressure shall be determined pint/y by Engineer and loco/ approval agency 4. Chla ma i of the system shall be accomplsh°d after the water main has been successfullypressure tested and thoroughly 6usfed Disinfeclion shall be in accordance w/AWWA C-601. The method of disinfection shall be approved by the Engineer and only after samples of water Pram the hushed di'snfected morn shows no evidence of bacteriological contamination. Use 50 mg/T for 24 hourss fie concentration must remain above 25 m911 Tablet disilecben rs not acceptable. Sanitary & Storm Mains 7. The pipe for sanitary sewer and storm shall be PVC gravely sewer pipe SOR J5 (AS7,440 JOJ4) with rubber s-hhq rings. Al/ pipe shall be laid to the line and grade shown en the plans. 2 fie instolled -Italy sewer pipe Moll be /ow pressure air tested o the presence of the Engineer After pipe cleaning, the pipe section (manhole to manhole) shall be tested according to the following procedures.' An internal pipe pressure of 4 pounds per square inch greater than any bock pressure due to o Water table shall be created. A minimum of two (2) minutes shall be allowed for temp -tune stabilrotien. fie pipe section shall be considered acceptable when, tested at o pressure of J pounds per square inch greater than any bock pressure, the section does at /arse air of a rote greater than 0.00J0 Nm/sf, of Httennal ppe oreo. Seoaration of Water and /or Sanitary & Storm Mains t. No water main shall be closer than ten (w) feet to any sonitory sewev,staint sewer or sanitary manhole, and flm (5) feet to any catch basin. Prowde mnknum of 18' vertical separation between water morn and storm/sonitory sewer. Tes tiny and Notes In addition to the abom requirements, oh/ water likes and sewer lines and manholes shall be thoroughly tested by the Contractor in accordance with the Enwronmento/ Protection Rules 9110/81, Appendix A, Section A-01(✓RK) and A-04(Od'H). Note: Al/ construction shall be accomplished in accordance with the standards set fortn in the latest edition of the public woks specifcation of the City of South Burlington and referenced specifcotion; in the case of confice the more stringent specification shall apply Contractor she/ keep o log book of at /east three swing ties to service locations and any points of deflection or water main fittings. Books shall be turned over to the Owner upon acceptance of Work. E7evations to the fop of services shall also be recorded R All wafa, rioted war t for be pe/ did in C oecordmce wen Ma Specie abets abd E I Defa✓r to, free o, bi, han of Ab/r /root and fabancrt /o- rI wbfr salons Oared y/rh� ahrmaoh xbre a:snot one at, or Sd�lh Hhg(ab, and Me Wage of Arch. " M,qr of so. aurlivton General Water Main Notes. Mt C erne winces and F .prink/er mover Mar ore --led to it. pubic ote- syrrn she/ be a-teet d cecaMnq to their degree of nor a wiM o back Bow pmwntan es 61, d an appropncfe fAemel exO-ob iptem. Plea- confect Mre dgoerement / more olb-fiab an back.ow p-fecrrab deuces fie aapoly a-- ruwd now to Prowds access to free Oeprfm-t for the moons of ondetahnq wet. asfnbueab emergency repo,- abd move--., ors mowed by Me City werf amok Aecea would asp bow to be P-wowo to Me Depanmert fr Me- taro atop. /ocot.d _lode the city ROW fr phew aeeMq service to deboga rt accounts provided that Me al, a/ so bb s.el,gtm hWows the reauxemanfs ref taro, m Stole Statute line 24 VSA, aupfer 129, Unrfrm Abfe abd Sew.- oi:,cmneet. F r-hcn and sx-nah Pgoe snoN how no less moo 2 boss wedges verso/led of coca ' k t slot-mM Poe Whom now no ten inn J wedges hsfated or ebdh loot. th. South 8,abb9t- able agortmmf a-d,. we& horn that At/ ware trees and nppunmabeet not located m the City Hght-o/-way r pubic grounds knoll be errtidm-M prrwre pursuabe to the ardnabce abd other of the Cry, end, fie Oeparfmebt Whb/ not mooeon any weer lines that haw not fiver/, been occepred by the City. except 0 s diwshbns Mot we aeWgned to Oeoartmanf speerf ations amt a- mtehded to be oaeepfed, md,- All water bhet and appurtenances located -tho on or'eo sal desors -s igo.eed t-eed or private by the aewxopr moil be cabmdoed Rn to Histencny, the Swat Mnhyton hbfr Oepa,t nt has ,Ochcea oxrseemg the -po,r and bntenabce of as wale moos and appurtaban-s of ham Mole moms not located h the ROW r deeded ow to the City area- Rana/ If must be and rood that fait Oepartm-t would ably Mawde Me acrnce of oeersxwq the rope, Wd mootabbtee of all water mbns abd Wonebabees one we how m;oeeted wd app-wd the ,nstal0alab of Me warn mom end eo bee lines betend the Chry oehed fKohabt Me /bbr rote woad be the same as approved h the Mabegemabf Cabubee by the ft pion wbtr Qarnc�r abd Me City of sauth 9.Hm9 fm, mwesd abm awy the above rN cod /aer and mol-d ebrges are m d'ran to my f regv✓ed ands the South &uH gtw ebfe Ogortmenf Oro'hab". sveb as but not bm,ted to private F bad pots and IPM*/a, Whams At M,s tkme pdwre Nee bM*ents are assessed at $100 pe bybant -a+ f-... me S-0, tkrHhgtm Mote Ogortmmt shoe/ be sat any frtu- hard eoay p/ms inro/vinq Mrs propel l r -view F ewe dab. must me/ude defWs abd 4p r ahobs as regahi.d h the oboes 'ZwbOed wecillcobws. the Savfh Bur/hgtw Nitta, Deportment Whop be mined prw- to baNniMg to nvwt e/ pkhrs nthngs mph the r Ps Ppurtehabces warn Ilse rasshgs and testmq. A hid copy set of As -Built, as wr/ or ens metrab c copy in Aura-CAO.DOG ✓ ,ae /4 F of via, shah/ be s w*d to Mis Ogsrtmnt upon c p/erirh of the wolf item -,o,om nebe. FOR PERMIT REVIEW Short secr,rh of cgcpe Wool weM trm'p dug ra ae oWwea' of Me and of each cob Wt Renow rnrr /h. Is aQsnobd to d'wdaae um _ N07E.' 1, lop may be made dh a by to aucb7e noire ppe. With other place use either o coup/rig contaning a factory -topped brass bushing Or use a double strop service damp. 2 All tope larger than J/4' requke the use of broore sadd/es .2 All brass unions and adapters shall be Mueller, Cambridge or McDonald. 4 the Contractor .Moll not install curb box in sidewalk ar per-ent. 5 SWinit shop drawings to Engneer !or all camponsnts of the water system. I -Access cop -rWrecopic curb bon; buffalo type Mueller H-lOJJ4 or approved equal New carporollan stop Mud/er H-15008 or approved equo/- Hartronta Curb stop, Muelle bast /opp H-15200 or approved equal sd/d concrete block Water Service Detail N. rs pmg sesefaYs fewrsed) See water trench detod for bedding requirements Dote -weed O..,Vffan Checked I Dote Design 1AJ De fC//5 Drawn FMP Checked _- Scale N. rs-- Meadow/ands Business Complex Date MY-1 20M Lot 2 Meadowlcnd Industrial Pork Project Q5746 472 Meodowfand Onve Sa/M Burfingtm, titrmant Z"ffs &L9NSING Consulting engineers, Inc. D-' >B4 rVain Fusee; Colchester, lrermont 05446 4 Rood Construction Notes (AN ewearo, roadrhea appy Pwkhg wear as wee, t New road shall be constructed to the line and grade shown an the drawings. The road and utility /ocotians shall be typically detailed un/ess otherwise shown. 4' IUrAL bit. cons (1-1/2. Type H/) 2 Methods for construction of sub -base shall conform to Vt. Highway Specs. (2001). 20312 "subgrade' in all respects or as (2 1/2 rype /l determirted by the Engineer. sea site plan for sass slope (jq• mill f J. Grovel sub -base for pavement shall conform to ✓t. Highway Specs. (2001). 704.05 table 704.05A coarse - bituminous Carlotta pavement 4. Leveling course shoe contain to Vt. Highway Specs. (2001), 704.05 table 704.05A, fine. Shoulders shoo conform to section ice 6' crushed grovel-d v 704.72. Aggregate tar Shoulders /eve//erg course •s^ 70♦.05A �qe 5 Bituminous concrete pavement shall conform to Vt. Highway Specs. (2001) Section 406. Binder coarse shall be type Jr and finish wearing coarse shall be type]EC. 12 Crushed grow/ 70405A wbbase (704. 05A, 6. Any sub -base or subgrade disturbed by Contractor, or rendered unsuitable by construction machinery shall be removed and codfse 12'grote/ base (in Anal. replaced with approved granular backfr/l. Sub -base shall have 95R of maximum compaction density before rood construction. /does Getwetn parking and aA 7. The Contractor shall be responsible for a// compaction tests for the rood foundations and utility trenches. serV/ce ydodJ b Fill material for rood embankment shall be approved by the Engineer. Fill shall be placed in 6" lifts and wetted and compacted with sodsfoctary compaction equipment fie Contractor shall perform 2 compaction tests ewy, 100' at the limits of /n areas requ.Ybg more 12' m—risen 'Mal fiA 703Qr. the Wing operation and shall recmpact areas with less than 95X of maximum density, (Standard Proctor). than 12" of M/, all ( J motena shall be 70laY 9 When applicable, the Contractor shall follow Vt. Highway ( J placing spreading sand Mere shall be no p g y Specs. 200J Section 2031J for /.till and reodin embankments � � I-T1—?T1ARMT: of a,Wtk,7 -II—i I — II— i l I I-IT1-Tor= r_l0 Rood in rill sections shall be placed and compacted o minimum of J feet above top of any utility to be installed, before exco-led -.frias .�.,��jfTj� french is excavated far pipe placement. In trenchesand cut sections the Contractor shall provide al necessary sheeting, -1 I I-1 I I —I —I I I I shar/ng and bracing to maintain compliance with al/ OSHA/bOSHA regulations MkaA 5. and Or underdrakm —, —' I I III —III —III —III -I I I_I 11. Sand n/ shall contorm to Vermont Highway Specifications (2001) 7030J table 70303A. os ardwed by mgmem- '- Typical Pavement Cross Section N. T. S � dKwwvy 4" waekw ern �w 1 I/2' fad fpe ll/ r y,�e bifumiraua paWrq ro melon aerating D,afo AOT yea 4aS OJ Ao e, ! _p• 1T' - 0' 12 - O _ 1, a* ore emnocrw moll be eymaaa hr caamvliq Pe ..d "^^O1aO movrw wghfry eaoi. m I nai s+d/ h Wotertighf c l, marked 1• 4' Mpsoa -fors no afmn gren(e, mar J' is _a .. 95.[ 90A7 '`ys E c/eanout" I 1 '- z ,/z' barn ryPe n Irerwe lama. day w morw,a standard standard I $ 7 grew 70I. a1 Mkoff fawx SaM 12' mho aw0 an minor: thee rower name paaa �n r1" atria me aO tar p tar I 45-bat and rroigot NDaw Nh,inum aorta. AOT ,$x 7a1 aJ cmwoc! oa wxmrN ,p ear bryp to be N' L 8 argwmw terra/ Swtd m 0- are oI r 114• ro J14• PIC .SDR M n nw—dEm a%wad afore ale wde,M by /•" /Poe tuna afar. henna.. a 2' h e'rere —a ma — comae cafe eemege Pwe) - � Typical Drive Detail ' Sty./ Inwlalim I Nigid fie• (ru/I tenth wrh and aiwa - 5 N. r.s s 46' wye hr in line de.aouts 45/ and sp/gat tarterm/no/ aautwyun donnonfs 1 aYmee arms I/I • fe 1,' eaow aerie erlxre a/ppe see Mir riot as Ppe ftpea me sxea waeruread mermv Sanitary Cleanout Detail Sanitary Trench Detail N. rs el rs I—. & __ Newham R-1642, Lebanon LC 266 ar egea Boat /evdbrq celrrse (5) runes max. (2J courses min. 0o not mortar 4,_hxe o/ bri.t U red hardened wear beak any Proved. cast fn p/ace Step! when depth exceed, 6' Born rim to invert Use pdyprgojlwe p/artie rungs Yh roavn 60 stet/ rekrlorcement ar egad cam. Asphalt coated me.fk Finish grad, shape to a GYwrf frame to enck Pr,mok becks balm -Mar erg _ r • BodrMl with bushed grovel ��(704.O5J h 6' tilts Compact to 95Z of moximum density: (Standard RroctarJ 4,-0' 0' Ring gastet w Mostfc AS7M C478 Proco,t rem/arced concrete manhole and cow by Comp Precast, Gfsea✓d Or equal 06 not mortar mold. face of manhole 'y2• Manhae shoo be vacaum tested whore /oeest pint f, still exposed wthg aanitor. PGe • Rwnorr tapneeded Ne, g PYC cost e in Won ar .seer regi gasket id, a// ppe penetrations 4000 psi coaxer, �J/4' UneirNrbed mofena ---�/ to I l/2' _eel` stone toil New Sanitary Mcnhole (Dog House St)le) Mrs Get, .9- shah/ be A.W.W.A. C 500-60 Standard Gate Valves th medfon/cd joints of sires as requied on the .tons A// va✓ves shall be of cast ar drone I- body, Para/a brass seotR non-Hsing stem. inside screw, res�'ent wedge const ction with 0Rig Stain S /s A// w/ors to be equ0ped with o w/w box for a ininknum of 5 feet (5) of cow matarf. f.. Are gate valves shal/ R- counter /oatwise and be designed for a working pressure of ZOO psi rrnish AdAlstab/a ion curb style dab bat with Cost ken caw mo/ked 'water' 6' emir. row - �Nbfw mokr Gushed stone Undisturbed raa thoroughly carmpoeted Tio cal Gate Valve N. rs A# warn r.&,I d wart to be per/ ad is ccordance in Me ;near ahwr, and aeroas ,sr the lnsfoaor- of ebre, Ines and aPPurfmmces for as Nate, sweemr Oened by in. 0Y0,nv/oin Were, Oisbfct, the City of South Budingrm, and the vxa x of ✓enc/mo.' All -/`es rho// ba AWWA approved nufactured by Muel/m; Clow or approved equal. All w/yes rho// be open te,dockwisa Provide raAxtcr in accordance with Municpa/ Standard. 4 -0, mfn. Ad,Usrab/e cost it valve box with coon Breakaway pin anted ''-ter' % t; C v o// valves J (rust block--4:6• dE d52 wets see deton romPmred yeyr Q"J/r afased :rm concrete curb (typo) 2 1/2' M'w moos concrete sidewalk. 1 1/2 Type it base. 1' rjpe Stop - broom Anish concrete - All pints to be tool Anished - Exyansian/cwafractim pints ewy 20' e/fh 1/2',cint h1/r. - Scm 1/7 total dgoth at to' interval, rodls rued bituminous concrete /n wear requinnq more 12w mh7k"I/111. sand 17/ (ro.10j) , than 1? a/ IW. all A materfd shall be 70303 send fine she/ be no Prm! stow of existing Und/sWrbed -.feria ar wbgrode with excavated muter/as caepoeled Me Engineer present. % if tW coarse ofpovemant is not laid m some season as bore, the controctw shaA sweep ond gpp/y emu/siasd asphalt to bow coarse pavement pear to /oymg top coma 4' RJTAL bit. con. rlppe ne 11 1/2' Tj 6' L0veknq course (70405A, Ane) '12. Dashed grovel subb- (704.Q5A, morsel M6roA 50t7K Dpico/ Pavement with Curb & Sidewalk N. rs Construction Notes 1. fie Contractor w71 be responsible tar a// construct/on of wafer main, storm and sanitary, sewn systems as shown on the plans He will be responsible Jor a/ necessary, adopters, rittinq; eta to make connections to the existing and proposed utilities. the Contractor shall be responsible for all work shown or implied an the plans and/or re%rented in the sodeirlcofims and permits Ate Contractor shot/ submit for approval by the Engineer all types of materials and produces used Sanitary & Storm Mains J. fie pipe for sanitary sewer and storm shall be PVC gravity sewer pipe SVR J5 (AS7MO JOJ4) with rubber sealing nngs. All pipe shall be laid to the line and grade shown an the plans. 2 fie installed sanitary sewer pipe shalt be low pressure air tested in the presence of Me Engineer. Alen ppe cleaning, the pipe section (in a to manhole) shall be tested according to the /blowing procedures: An intend ppe pressure of 4 pounds per square inch greater than any bock pressure due to a water table shall be created. A minimum of two (2) minutes shall be allowed for temperature stab'/fzotioa. Ate pipe section rho// be considered acceptable when, tested at o pressure of J pounds per square inch greater than any back pressure the section does not tore air at o rote greater than QOOJO crin/xf of ineemal pipe area. Separation of Water and /or Sonitory &Storm Mains 1. No water main shall be closer than ten (10) feel to any sanitary sewer, storm sewer ar sanitary manna/e and Ave (5) feel to any catch basin. Provide minimum of W vertical separation between wafer main and storm/sanitary wwer. Testino anal Notes /n addition to the above requirements all water hies and sewn lines and manholes shall be thoroughly tested by the Contractor fn accordance with the Environmental Protection Rules 1/1/05, Appendix A, Section A-02(J&K) and A-04(GdH). Note: A// construction shall be accomplished in accordance with the standards set earth in the latest edition of the public works spxiArotion of the City of South Buningtan and re/wenced specifications, !n the case of canACL the more stringent spea/f/cotion shall apply cantractar shah keep o�I� book of of least three swing ties to service locations and any points of deflection orwain mom Aftings. Books shall be Wined over tr #MW jar acceptance o/ work. E/evatio s to the top of services shall also be recorded C lCEFI VED N07F Al/ water rd.ted work to be perlwmed in AY O �] 1. S.- Nation, e. worn mops rh u be h a..ardanca with occordace with the $oeciff-hans and J �Ri�n the sec --dad standard, ( sawage +ink,• ro-ce'/ed Oetoas tar the /nstd/otian of Wafer limes one `(/� twin +tote staadovo appurt»onros lr as Nbew Syetam e0 Z Sewers Kral be lad at /east 10 het hwiaanrawy Iron any enxthg w proposed -e—.. My a'srmee rhav by by the Chomplai, Mbtw Di,lrfeL fh /fit measured edge to edge. If this distance cannot be obroned. South Budblglm, and the Wage of .her a N( o. ,� than Me pees and/ be instated-ardinq to Mex tp. defod, the Contractor sham-&- hyd mf V.ciRcation �V ingtOn Mbtar with M nicpaify b.e re and-&g. Hv*-t shill be accordance efth AWWA C-502 J-ray part type breotorojs MUegw Super Centurion 25a A-423 Select eock/vl compacted _ 6' ductae ion rotor Kahn edy Q orofon K-B/A, Or Wbtaai, P.- n 6• l 951 rfaneoM 18min. (dare 52) a'erece e th fro 2,4' hose nolefes and one 4Vi proctor density pmpw noxz/a Sewro bun p bog ow h,w.*wt unto placed into se vice. O Sawn Sewers crossing worn maers anal ae laid tb pro wee a -- in -fica' art-- of 16' betwrwm p;pe. Sew jaxta wd/ be equbieanr ♦♦p and as hr as pos,dle awn In,, -I-an o' pints. Nhe, ;t ,s _Passes. to wan props Y Walter main sepwvfim, Me sewn shah be dea¢red and -C c---tad equal fa role, pipe and sho.4 be F pressure tested to assure rotertight,_ ndrsturbed earth, typical pow to b.oklwmg. Sewer / Water Separation Detail Concrete thrust bi c*Ll N. rs unasfurbed in. i. (see thrust bloot data.') Hyd a tea q -t A// hydrant drainsnder/ova" stone pldS_ be pamanene/y plugged 1 Co rho// provide LUw J end. pdyefhyfene swing ties for a/ rotor line betweart concrete and bends and albows Affing (tjpicM) 2 A// M✓ g/ands shall be Yfew/uq' w approved _qual T,ypiccl Hydron t De toil N. rs FOR PERMIT REVIEW Data nwsed Oere/P raj cnecs-d � lore Design 1A✓ _ De tails Drawn FMP Checked Seale IV. rs MeodOW/ands Business Comp/ex Date AroyA 2006 Lot 2 Mecdowlcnd lndustriol Pork Project 05146 1 472 Meadow/and Drive South BUnington, Vermont ARFSS & ",VSING Consulting A'ngineers, Inc. Q-2 !64 Alain Stree4 Colchester, Ve"non,' 45""6 r t ns. NO strength -shrink grout Pond overflow E74. IM 0 Cut saner of weir 'slats' in --I. slroetur. rota/ of B' in U •g pa ramp gins swo ea o < aP /mqM, 6' high. 4' dlOmeter ° clean of dMns and sdm,f and in worknq -a .. Revak of damage ana/ be a • imp/emenfd as soar os ah—a`tions a/env. r p—,, ,arch worse/ 6' auetd. kern Pipe ----------- ----- . -ibng bur not /un/rd to no/bae check dams and sat f ce bameve shay be with dorntu0 & Nbow. r ..� _ ,mPlemr,rd ;mmdarery f7t wtYh cap leolunng °. 151' di -ter hde cut m cap. Cost /son bee hive kame a„d one s N e k [ Detention Basin Maintenance Notes grate or welded steel fresh rack, cant ctor shelf submit ,hop drawings (or approval PLAN /MPLEMENrA POV T Of and = JT8.5 aP P /. Strmwat, detmNm/o-eotmwt focaitY must e< -Warned in good oproting re, or all 9--------__-- / r;mes and soar be cl<and or hates y to main rain odeguor< t,—tmmt capoc/ty At a minmum Ina fa/owing proeedres should be imp/emenfd � ¢aP o. Gassed area. oho// be mowed os needed to prevent growth of brush. A Gassed vegetation should be estob/i>Yed and ,.,n,Mwod cur o// areas showing bye sod I. 5da% rIne op<umu/atd in the Cash sea deep, Mon 6' shay/ be removtd and aspdsd of ;n on uplond sea at /cost 100 / t f— waters of In, .tote. All sp d nvreea areas sea/ be topsodd s-a d and mu/chd d bluer sevct mi,, storm ed ato /mad / l/ oes- woe, -face Wee JJs S' Inv. J36.5 sump ° g / min. 12' of7 Batter mieopod J1.�/ a compacted e - ^ grove/ a Stormwoter Detention Basin Out/et Detail N. T.S. Rod Weodd on bou, d wM our. rya=. t.— itJ6'ooty 1.21 ' oay II AarnPte C n-M it Net.r I 1 I. )a p/eN fo " Pona,.d a meton red.. h srH /b. J/e' loft 4.d * 1 to b. nit to JO A • LenvM of fa plan is w ♦ lo' I2 II' a Jo' awns,.t . haWtlr. od W ♦ 2Y b J6' ro Ie' dhn.fr Pa. irduYva -�- 2 Svkt ..afar b /2' t. 24' dkewtr pp. h w. to M mod it on. W.- Rsi+anw! S 9FH raar/oo hr Jo' h M' donors Plo. - hWra/vs m.r b. mods oar two ahwh yrd DY ,Ming r Dathg an cents lh..iM ' J/e' gavan/ted oven r beta A Cwrneeto- ..:flan, cams pdt. and to. W. to M awns mpg. oa WrH and soot to e. e' got -bed. law !zee mow spear Caved- r w pith oars 9retran Pp a.Hlllrr 1ha1 al —Wml A . L W M AAr, M I1 Y2S saw Body a w I h s law r e r Y Y+ 7 axe r1 .ar4 1 e r ar Y � n r xr TI .af4 N J I M t o r h Y .oA IP r1 I Y q+� I h Y .0A 14 11 / W R t t M1 N Y .IID .sae If d N fl II Y rt Y M Y a rya ur t r/ t h t Pe End Section Detail ore M#Vfl 100 Nt, fabric / Stop/a fabric to snow fence / Fcvm 12' hasp trench Stoko /oy /atria i bottom rover rith 9-1 Flaw I Bd/ost I� Section A -A Nbod slakes ah'ven on ab- s/go. side of fence II q'IP' II II II II i tl II II V U V V A _T,wica/ Term orarySi/t Fence Erosion Control Barrier N. rs �°� Stormwater System Maintenance Schedule /. 1he stbvmwe, Ktem ;s corransd of any prtkxr of Me sate Mat dveers r can ). war,. 2 Cotcn boson wmps reload b1 hsp.efd mWony and sassed as reaukd ,! Ae ateiw, era .weer mast e. m4—td rq donv snit ,gamed os ,posed. Spxia ottmt In most b. glv.n to wint, tens ,m cona't;avrs J Erosion Contra/ and Construction Sequence 1. fie purposes of erosion control shall be discussed with and approved by the Engineer and the C/'ty of South Bunifngton prior to any clearing, grubbing, stripping or construction of any kind. 2 All erosion control shall be placed as shown on the drawings or as ordered by the Engineer. Ail erosion contra measures shall be, at a minimum, inspected weekly and maintained to fuiAll the intent discussed above fie Contractor shall maintain the erosion control measures until the Engineer is satisfied that permanent ground cover has been established and that further measures are not required. J when erosion contra/ measures are deemed no longer necessary, all materials detained including sift and construction debris shall be collected and disposed of in a manner acceptable to the Engineer and the City of South Burlington. 4. if highly erodible sa/7s ore encountered the Contractor may be required to provide rime matting gob/on ar rivet mattresseg rip rap or other measures as necessary to prevent erosion. The Contractor shall stockade hay boles to protect, at a minimum, al/ work in progress All exposed embankments sho/l be topsoi/ed, seeded and mulched as soon as possible after construction. 5. nine Contractor shall use water and/or calcium chloride for dust contra. The Contractor shay/ o/" sweep Meadow/ond Drive as required to maintain dust control MeoA 100, Star hoot attached to stokes rn uR.*. side. Silt fence spacing chart 9'4" SRt nonce sp-a mg .ET to fox 50 a or less 10X 1. 2OX 25 At or less > 20Z /5 2 ar /less Wood stakes driven on outside of fence Orange pdyeal, mesh webbing by Ntar/d Qlp SLPply , approved equal (2' wide min.) Fasten farce Nbod Stake to stoke 7Y LYrrge pdyest, mesh webbing by NW/d Cup Supply or opprowd aqua (2' wide min.) -.41111 d 11 `I I I IJ Section A —A A� - - - ------ - Io De instoked at the /rmih of Me co 11—tian area. See Pions Typico/ Construction Limit Fencing N rs .$oeng wrier aependkq on ch-st sop. A urns r --- - - - - - -----owt Is, vela a w�, e' d+Ip roe ,venter PRAri[L Not lb Sede A Public right-of-way 2 '�`'. 1 �m0n 4� Q Cart, "�?� -r art ,IS' ?. 9'IIh. Aft Existing ground Profile Provide appropriate tronslNon '�� Fptw• Foibno +;,,, ',r �leh,l �tr Fmbna between Stabilized Construction MEADOWLANDS i ��� Entrance and Public Righf Business Complex B alrNpr le' of Noy bottom 1Q Business Name Here 50' - S£C712V A -A SECnOrV B-B j`- „0' © Business Name Here Not ro Sco/s Not ro So./. Public Existing 2p• 1 1/2" to 2' Right of I © Business Name Here grain crushed stone Way I 4 Business Name Here 0 cays7Rucnov 9aEQf7Gntws ® Business Name Here 1. Stine wB/ be Placed on a Alt, foDnc foundation to the tine; Plan grades and /arotlans shown in the pion. © Business Name Here 2. Set Nspacing of dreck dens to oswma that the Newtions of Me crust Stabilized Construction Entrance © Business Name Here up e- dam is the soma Newtlarr o/ Me toe of the ® Business Name Here Energy efficient ground I Extend the stone a minimum of 1.5 feet bd the ditch mounted sign light. Dinka to prevent cutting around the dam. 09 Business Name Here Carmel 40-T 5OW (max) r4 4 Protect the dramN downstream of the rawest Mack dam Iran scour Halogen Low Vatage (12V) and rosian with stave or liner as apprtio6ot. ® Business Name Here w approved equal. .£ Ensure that ch-W appurt---s such as -/vK entrances below See lighting plan drat* dams are not .nbpct to domogw or blockage Aim aVvIeced stones "a Stone Check Dam Nrz ya <andseope bed-�`ie:? Sea Landscape Plan. RECEIVED s o d o d MAY 0 9 2006 ps �s a o a FOR PERMIT REVIEW a W City of So. Burlington � i D d a � sate ,eased ���.n r;a, I aar< 0 0 Design Drawn De tar/s Directory Siqn Detoil Checked - Meadow/ands Business Comp/ex Scale N. rs. Date Mays 200e Lot 2 Meadow/and /ndustriq/ Park Pro' ct 05146 472 Meadowland OHm ARBBS & LANS1WC Consulting engineers, Ina !B4 A(ain Stree4 ColeAester, 4ermont 05446 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD \drb\sub\munson\prelim_final_obrien DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: May 19, 2006 Application received: May 9, 2006 PUD- 472 Meadowland Drive PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD-06-33 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-06-34 Agenda # 8 Meeting Date: June 6, 2006 Applicant Owner O'Brien Brothers Partnership Munson Earth Moving Corp PO Box 2184 85 Shunpike Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Williston, VT 05495 Engineer Ian Jewkes Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Location Ma Property Information Tax Parcel 1155-00472-C Hinesburg Road North View Protection overlay District 8.13 acres CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\prelim final obrien O'Brien Brothers Partnership, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking preliminary and final plat plan review for a planned unit development consisting of a 50,000 sq. ft. contractor or building trade facility, 472 Meadowland Drive. The applicant underwent sketch plan review on April 18th (minutes attached). Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on May 9, 2006 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements 10''Zoning District' Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 3 acres 8.13 acres Max. Density n/a n/a Max. Building Coverage 30% 14.3% Max. Overall Coverage 50% 38.4% Min. Front Setback 50 ft. 50 ft. Min. Side Setback 35 ft. >35 ft. Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. 200 ft. Max. Building Height 35 ft. 35 ft Front Yard Coverage 30% 14.9% 4 n/a SUBDIVISION CRITERIA zoning compliance no residential units proposed Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. The entire meadowland Business Park has been preliminarily approved for water allocation. However, the applicant shall still adhere to the comments of the South Burlington Water Department regarding this proposal. 1. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the South Burlington Water Department as dated May 18, 2006. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\prelim final obrien According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The original subdivision received a 51,272 gpd sewer allocation which is still in effect. TO date there is 48,380 gpd available. 2. The applicant shall receive sewer allocation prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The applicant has submitted a grading and erosion control plans which will sufficiently prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating adverse conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 3. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading of the site shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. This issue was previously addressed to the satisfaction of staff and the applicant. Access to this property is proposed via one (1) 24' drive off of Meadowland Drive. The access drive will split and access two parking areas. The westerly side will serve as parking for some staff and customers to the site. The easterly side will service delivery trucks and a limited amount of parking. Staff finds this sufficient for the proposed use. The areas do not connect at the southern edge of the property. Staff has consulted with the Fire Chief on this matter and it has been resolved to his satisfaction. A 20' fire lane will be provided for emergency access at this area of the building. Staff agrees with the applicant that it is not prudent to connect the areas as passenger vehicles may be tempted to access the easterly side of the building and come into conflict with commercial vehicles. According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, the 50,000 square feet of contractor or building trade facility is estimated to generate 22 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The applicant has estimated 50 PM peak hour trip ends and would like approval for such. Staff finds this acceptable. Calculation #3c of the September 10, 1996 subdivision approval for the business park required that "prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Rte 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City." (Swift Street Extension is now known as Meadowland Drive). 4. Prior to issuance of the zoning permit, the applicant shall submit an updated signal warrant analysis for the Route 116/Meadowland Dr. intersection. If a signal is warranted, the applicant shall install the signal prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\prelim final obrien 5. The Board grants the applicant 50 PM peak hour trip ends for the subject property. The applicant shall pay traffic impact fees based on this number. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The subject property contains identified Class II wetlands. However, neither the parking areas nor the building encroach upon these wetlands or their respective buffers. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. According to Section 6.04(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Industrial -Open Space l0 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and Burlington International Airport. The 10 District regulations and standards are intended to allow high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open character of the district, minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and enhance the visual quality of approaches to the City while providing suitable locations for employment and business growth. The location and architectural design of buildings in a manner that preserves these qualities is strongly encouraged. Staff feels the proposed project is in compliance with the stated purpose of the 10 District, as outlined in the Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. There are significant portions of open space running along the southern portions of the property, so staff feels this requirement is met. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memo dated May 31, 2006. 6. The applicant shall adhere to the conditions of the SBFD as per the memo dated May 31, 2006. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the southern and eastern side of the proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian and recreation traffic through the property. However, staff suggests that this is the most appropriate time to move the easement to the west so as to keep it out of the wetland buffer. The CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\prelim final obrien South Burlington Recreation Department concurs with this. While no construction of the path is planned at this time, it will facilitate the process at a later date. 7. The recreational path easement should be relocated further west so as to avoid the Class 111 wetland buffer. 8. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The subdivision plans for the entire Meadowland Business Park show details on street utilities, lighting, and stormwater management. These have been approved by the City Engineer, so they are acceptable for the proposed project. The applicant has submitted an adequate lighting point by point plan for the proposed project which meets the requirements in Appendices A.9 and A.10 of the Land Development Regulations. In addition, the applicant has submitted exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the proposed lighting on the subject parcel. The proposed lighting fixtures shall be in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. 9. The lighting fixtures shall be revised to be in compliance with Appendix D of the SBLDR. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed development of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations, any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the southern and eastern side of the proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian and recreation traffic through the property. According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the 50,000 square feet of contractor or building trade facility will require 25 spaces plus one space for each employee. The number of employees is unknown at this time. As the applicant is proposing 90 parking spaces, the site shall be limited to 65 employees. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\prelim final obrien 10. The site shall be limited to no more than 65 employees. If at any time the collective businesses on the site employ more than that number, the applicant shall either provide additional parking or return to the Board to request a parking waiver. According to Table 13-7 of the Land Development Regulations, a property with 90 parking spaces requires four (4) handicapped -accessible parking spaces. The plans depict four handicapped - accessible spaces. The dimensions of the proposed parking areas appear to meet the requirements in Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is depicted on the plans. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. All of the proposed parking is located to the side of the building. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The height of the proposed building is in compliance with the SBLDR. The proposed project is located in a business park in a area where industrial uses exists, so staff feels the scale of the proposed building is compatible with existing buildings in the area. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant has submitted elevations of the proposed building. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant has submitted elevations of the proposed building. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sublmunson\prelim final obrien of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Because the project is in a large lot, industrial area, staff does not feel access to adjacent properties is necessary. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans show dumpsters to be typical of each unit. Those dumpsters appear to be adequately screened. Landscaping and Screening Requirements Based on the cost projections submitted by the applicant for this property, the minimum landscaping costs are $22,500. The applicant has submitted a landscaping budget which exceeds this minimum requirement. 11. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the South Burlington City Arborist as per his memo dated May 19, 2006. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area with twenty-eight (28) or more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. All interior and perimeter planting shall be protected by curbing. Interior planted islands shall have a minimum dimension of six (6) feet on any one side, and shall have a minimum square footage of sixty (60) feet. Large islands are encouraged. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans depict two snow storage areas. The snow storage area shown to the northeast of the property conflicts with the pedestrian easement. This area shall be moved or otherwise altered so as not to conflict with the pedestrian easement. 12. The snow storage area shown to the northeast of the property shall be revised so as not to conflict with the pedestrian easement. Pursuant to Section 13.06(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any utility cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\prelim final obrien 13. The plans shall be revised to depict any utility cabinets on the site as effectively screened. View Protection Zone The subject property is located within the Hinesburg Road -North Scenic View Protection Overlay District and thus subject to Section 10.03(H) of the SBLDR. Specifically, no part of any structure within the zone shall exceed an elevation of 393.5 feet above mean sea level plus 5.8 feet for each 1000 feet that said part of said structure is horizontally distant from the Hinesburg Road -North View Protection Zone Base Line shown on the Scenic View Protections Overlay District Map. Other The South Burlington Director of Public works reviewed the previously submitted plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated June 2, 2006 (attached). 14. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the South Burlington Director of Public Works as per his memo of June 2, 2006. The subject property is located within the Industrial Open Space District and as such shall be subject to Section 6.04(F) and 6.05 of the SBLDR. All lots of three acres or more, an open space buffer strip no less than two hundred (200) feet in width shall be maintained along the boundary of the SEQ district. The proposed building is exactly 200 feet from the SEQ boundary. At the discretion of the Development Review Board, the buffer strip either shall be left in its open, natural condition or shall be required to be landscaped in accordance with the standards in Section 3.06(I) to provide appropriate screening of proposed uses from adjacent residential properties. This property does abut residential properties. At this time, the applicant is proposing a significantly sized landscaping berm to be placed at the corner most adjacent to those residential properties. The berm is proposed to be 15 feet in height at its highest point and roughly 160 feet in length. At the sketch plan hearing, the Development Review Board suggested that staff explore a set of conditions originally proposed for a property on site. Staff has examined these conditions and worked with the applicant to compose a reasonable set of conditions on the property: 15. a) The use of "Jake Brakes" by any vehicle going to or from the subject property on Meadowland Drive is prohibited. The applicant shall advise all drivers of this. b) There shall be no idling of diesel trucks for periods in excess of five (5) minutes on the subject property. c) There shall be no refrigerated trucks stored on the subject property. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\prelim final obrien d) The restrictions on scheduled truck vehicle trip ends on the subject property shall be as follows: 12:00 A.M - 5:59A.M. 6:00 A.M. — 11:00 P.M 11:01 P.M — 11:59 P.M. Monday no truck operations no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends Tuesday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends vehicle trip ends Wednesday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends vehicle trip ends Thursday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends vehicle trip ends Friday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions restricted to 6 truck vehicle trip ends vehicle trip ends Saturday restricted to 6 truck no restrictions no truck operations vehicle trip ends 6:00 A.M - 12:00 P.M no trucking operations 12:01 P.M — 11:59 P.M. ISunday I no truck operations I no truck operations I no truck o erations The Board shall allow exception for emergency cases where it is not prudent, either for reasons of safety or substantial financial impact, to wait until such a time where truck traffic would be allowed. For the purposes of clarifying the Board's intent, this shall include, as example, emergency service calls and deliveries which have been delayed due to poor weather or other hazard which has impacted traffic in the region. The DRB originally suggested that there shall be no use of a "back-up beeper" on any vehicle on the subject property between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. However, after sufficient research into local and state traffic and transportation law and code, staff does not advise implementing this condition. The potential safety and financial risk is too great. Staff recommends that the South Burlington Development Review Board approve Preliminary Plat application #SD-06-33 and Final Plat application #SD-06-34 subject to the conditional items listed above. Respectfully submitted, Cathya La Rose, Associate Planner Copy to: Munson Earth Moving, property owner O'Brien Brothers Partnership, applicant South Burlington Fire Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4110 May 31, 2006 Ms. Juli Beth Hines, Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: O'Brian Brothers Partnership 472 Meadowland Drive Dear Juli: I have reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of the proposed commercial building at 472 Meadowland Drive. I have also spoken with the developer Patrick O'Brian relative to the project. I have the following recommendations: 1. Compliance with all requirements of Vermont Division of Fire Safety codes and standards. 2. Automatic sprinklers and alarm system as required by Vermont Division of Safety. 3. Fire Department Sprinkler Connection location to be specified by SBFD. 4. Fire Alarm panel and enunciator location to be specified by SBFD. 5. Provide 24 hour per day off -site (central station) monitoring of all fire alarm and protection systems. 6. Provide an emergency key box, location to be specified by SBFD. 7. If an elevator is proposed the elevator car(s) to be sized large enough to accommodate an ambulance stretcher in the flat position. 8. Number and location of fire hydrants to be determined by the South Burlington Water Department. Actual final spotting of said hydrants to be done jointly with SBFD. 9. Drive around access is not necessary however in speaking with the developer he is willing to install an emergency access point at the rear of the building either using pavement or brick/grass pavers. Page - 2 At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves forward additional items may surface which can be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the developer and the Vermont Division of Fire. Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact furl Sincerely, Douglas S. Brent Fire Chief CI Cathyann LaRose From: Bruce Hoar [sbpwbkh@adelphia.net] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 10:02 AM To: Cathy Larose Subject: DRB Comments 6-2-06 -o: Cathy Larose, Associate Planner =r om: Bruce K. Hoar, Director of Public Works Ze: DRB Comments )ketch Plan #SD-06-28, Leslie Williams -here needs to be a crosswalks added to the plan to connect the sidewalks and rec path. III pavement markings to be durable, inlaid tape or vinyl. kll signage to be provided. iandicap crossings to be marked with truncated domes. Vhat is happening with existing home sewer connection? iammer Head configuration is not adequate, needs to be moved away from driveways. ,.eep road width constant at 24'. Jo private access to lot one over city ROW. Vhy bike path by others? Jot shown on sketch but no brick in manholes. 'avement thickness to be 4". Vater to be reviewed by SBWD unitary sewer pump station to be reviewed by WPCD. 'reliminary plat #SD-06-30 and Final plat #SD-06-31, Super -Temp Wire&Cable o bricks in aniv It e of Manh es o c i s I b tur ed over to the city. 'reliminary plat #SD-06-33 and Final plat #SD-06-34, O'Brien Brothers Jo bricks in any type of Manholes or Catch basins that will be turned over to the c'ty. ;urb reveal for city is 7". Plans show detail for 6". 5/2/2006 A May 18, 2006 Mr. Scott Homsted Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 RE: 472 Meadowland Drive Meadowlands business Complex Dear Scott: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. The attached Application for Water Allocation must be completed and returned to the South Burlington Water Department as soon as possible. As your project continues, the Application for Water Allocation will need final approval from this Department, which will be contingent upon available water storage capabilities within the City. Current water distribution system upgrades have been substantially completed that should allow for the construction of your project, pending approval of all other local and State requirements. 2. Based upon the final water allocation request, water service fees shall be applied to the project based on the current Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council, and therefore subject to change prior to completion of the project. 3. All construction drawings and plans shall have a note saying "All water line and related work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by th Champlain Water District, the City of South Burlington, Colchester Fire District 41, and the Village of Jericho, henceforth the "CWD Specification." 4. All water installation work and water distribution material must comply with the "CWD Specifications". Details for this project must be the same as those within the above referenced CWD Specifications. 5. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public water system shall be protected with a backflow prevention assembly, and an appropriate thermal expansion system in compliance with the Ordinance For The Control Of Cross Connections Within The Water System Of the City Of South Burlington, henceforth the "Backflow Ordinance." Please contact this department for more information on backflow protection devices. 6. The above referenced CWD Specifications state that no water lines shall be installed after November 15 or before April 1 without prior approval of the Superintendent. The Superintendent may restrict work before November 15 and after April 1 during adverse weather conditions. 7. Access must be provided to the Department for those curb stops located outside the City ROW for disconnecting service to delinquent accounts provided that the City of South Burlington follows the requirements set forth in State Statute Title 24 V.S.A. Chapter129, Uniform Water and Sewer Disconnect. 8. Eight -inch and larger Ductile Iron (DI) water pipe shall have no less than three (3) brass wedges installed at each joint. Bury depth to the new main shall be six feet (6') to the top of the pipe. 9. Mechanical joint restraints with twist off nuts shall be EBAA or Sigma, or a Department approved equal grip ring. 10. Fire hydrant assemblies shall consist of an anchor tee connected directly to a six-inch RW gate valve, the appropriate length of 6" DI pipe, the fire hydrant, and appropriate thrust block. All hydrants shall meet the aforementioned CWD Specifications, and a hydrant flag shall be supplied with each hydrant. Hydrant shall have all drains plugged prior to installation. Note: Waterous fire hydrants must be installed with a "Boston Operating Nut." 11. Corporations shall be Mueller B-25008 or Cambridge brass. Curb stops shall be Mueller B-25209 or Cambridge brass. All brass unions and adapters shall be Mueller or Cambridge brass. 12. No underground utility shall be installed within four feet from the water main on either side, from the top of the main to the finish grade, with the exception of storm sewer and sanitary sewer as stated in the above referenced Specifications. Generally, trees shall not be placed over any water main or service line, nor placed within 20' of any appurtenance, including fire hydrants. 13. The SBWD shall be sent any future hard copy plans involving this project for review. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in the above referenced Specifications. 14. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances, water line crossings, and testing. 15. Further review changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. 16. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, Jay Nadeau Superintendent CC. Cathyann LaRose Doug Brent Bruce Hoar Plan Reviews: 472 Meadowland Dr Lot 2 Meadowland Industrial Park- MWasoti, D`Bricrj 5/19/06 Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers Plan looks pretty good overall with 2 minor recommendations: 1. White or Black Spruce may be a better choice for this site due to heavy, poorly drained soils 2. Pruning should be restricted to dead, broken or dieing limbs of newly planted trees encerana rnmrma�orrZearn__... __._..-- . e.. profess 0 ima.t�ltartlgabout effective protocols. John, OUP: Come share your WOMEN HELPING BATTE Ail levels of high school xrid legal$ 802 343 8161. fence, get support from WOMEN offers free, confii -undergraduate math courses. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH THIRTEEN -WEEK SUPPORT those who have been there, educational support group Gr¢�treferepces. tache!F,epstad 31`6 9 O> . BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT GROUPS for women who are sur- learn about Obsessive women who have fled, are it®pstadwtc:edu . REVIEW BOARD vivors of adult and or childhood Compulsive Disorder and how to ing or are still living in a The South Burlington sexual assault. Group will include reduce its symptoms. Therapist where intimate partner vic Development Review Board will a yoga component. Please con- facilitated. Weekly meetings, is present. WHBW offers < hold a public hearing at the tact Meg at 864-0555. 802-343-8114. ety of groups to meet the ART LESSONS with Rachael South Burlington City Hall BEREAVED PARENT SUPPORT NW VT GAY AND LESBIAN diverse needs of women ai Rice, professional, nationally Conference Room, 575 Dorset GROUP: Every first Monday of Foster and Adoptive Parent children in this communiti juried artist. Improve your Street, South Burlington, the month at 6:30 p.m. in . Support Group: 6-8 p.m. The 658-1996. drawing, painting, overall cre- Vermont on Tuesday, June 6, Enosburg Falls, 10 Market Place, third Thursday of each month, VT PARENTS OF FOOD Al ativity. $25-$30/hour, supplies 2006 at 7:30 P.M. to consider Main St. Parents, grandparents starting October 20 through May, GY CHILDREN EMAIL SU: included. Results guaranteed+ the following: and adult siblings are welcomed. 2006. Casey Family Services, 46 TEAM: Info, contact Maryl 802-229-4427, rachae.t@fly The hope is to begin a Main St., Winooski. HAL, www.VTPFAC.com or c chickpro.com. 1. Preliminary plat application Compassionate Friends Chapter AUTISM: Free support group for 802-373-0351. BENCH MARK RENOVATION: #SD-06-30 & final plat #SD-06- in the area. Info, please call parents and caregivers of chit- MIXED GENDER COMING for all of your home remodeling 31 of Super -Temp Wire & Cable, Priscilla at 933-7749. dren with ASD. Montpelier, 2nd SUPPORT GROUP: Every 2 needs. Baths, kitchens, porches, Inc. for a planned unit develop- BIPOLAR SUPPORT GROUP: Sunday of the month, 3-5 p.m. and 4th Thursday, 6:30 p.n decks, garages and basements. ment consisting of a 35,000 sq. Open to members. New leader- at the Family Center. Call Jessica, facilitated by supportive p, Attention to detail. Competitive ft. manufacturing facility to be ship. A forum for strength,. 249-7961 for child :care inquires. and mental -health professi prices. John, 802-657-2642. constructed in two (2) phases, humor and self-discovery. For More info, www.aaware.org. and open to all lesbian, ga CHAMPLAIN SHORES: Phase I consisting of 30,000 sq. information, call Emma at 802- SUPPORT GROUP FOR MOTH- bisexual, transgender and Landscaping and stonework ft. & Phase II consisting of 899-5418. ERS OF CHILDREN WHO HAVE tioning adults age 23 and design, installation, maintenance. 5,000 sq. ft., 104 Bowdoin St. CONCERNED UNITED BIRTH- SURVIVED CHILD SEXUAL Check out this group meeti Stone patios, walkways, and walls. PARENTS: A group offering sup- ABUSE: The Women's Rape Crisis R.U.1.2?. Garden design and installation. 2. Preliminary plat application port if you have lost a child to Center in conjunction with TRANS SOCIAL AND SUPI Portfolio available upon request. #SD-06-33 and final plat #SD- adoption or are in reunion or Family Connection Center offers GROUP: First Wednesday, ( Todd Hotaling, BS Landscape 06-34 of O'Brien Brothers Agency have yet to begin your search. a free, confidential, ten -week p.m. Looking for peer supp Design/PSS. 802-233-7853. for a planned unit development 802-849.2244. support group. Info, 802- among other transgendered FIND YOURSELF SCATTERED to construct a 50,000 sq. ft. EATING DISORDERS PARENTAL 864-0555. folks? Need a safe space to AND DISORGANIZED? Whether contractor or building trade SUPPORT GROUP PARTNERS OF CHILDHOOD and be yourself? Check out you're a professional or manag- facility, 472 Meadowland Dr. for parents of children with or at SEXUAL ABUSE SURVIVORS. group meeting at R.U.1.2? ing a home and children, the risk of anorexia or bulimia. Meet 4th Monday of month. 60+ SUPPORT GROUP: On benefits of creating a healthy, 3. Final plat application #SD-06- Meetings 7-9 p.m., third R.U.1.2? Center, 34. Elmwood weekly support group for m creative, and organized living 35 of F & M Development Co, Wednesday of each month at the Ave., 6:30-8 p.m. Call Timberty, and women over the age of space are boundless. Let home LLC to amend a previously Covenant Community Church, Rt. 310-3889 or email missmor Share your strengths and st organizer and family manage- approved planned unit develop- 15, Essex Center. We focus on pheusi@yahoo.com for more gles with this particular sti ment coach, Annie Downey, help ment consisting of: 1) 309 resi- being a resource and providing info. life. We have fun! Facilita you make over, deep clean and dentiat units in six (6) build- reference points for old and new ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE and by Barbara L. Kester, Ph.D. organize your home, or work . ings, 2) subdividing two (2) ED parents. More information, Dementia support group. Held 3668. space. Free estimates and. fabu- parcels of 24.458 acres into call Peter at 802-899-2554. the last Tuesday of every month TOPS (Taking Off Pounds lous references. Call 802-318- eight lots, 3) a 73 unit multi- HEPATITIS C SUPPORT GROUP: at Birchwood Terrace, Sensibly) Chapter meeting, 1700 today and get started on family dwelling, 4) a 4,430 sq. Second Wednesday of the month Burlington. Info, contact Francis Xavier School, Wino organizing your home! ft. expansion into an indoor from 6-7:30. Community Health Stefanie Catetla, 863-6384. Sundays, 6 p.m. weigh-in, FREE SATELLITE TV system. recreation facility, 5) a 63 unit Center, second floor, 617 WEEKLY SMOKING CESSATION 7:30 p.m. meeting. Info, c Free installation. 800-784-7694. congregate care housing facility, Riverside Ave., Burlington support group: Small groups. Fred or Bennye, 655-3317 c Ref.# A-33515222. and 6) an existing 16,000 sq. ft. 802-355-8936. Caring atmosphere. Stop smoking Patricia, 658-6904. GENERAL CONTRACTOR, television studio & office build- SAVINGS SUPPORT GROUP for in just 21 days using natural, INTERESTED IN WRITING f HANDYMAN SERVICE. 20 years ing. The amendment consists of: all low to moderate -income proven, safe methods. No children? Support and critiqu experience. Fences, outbuildings, 1) increase the number of units Vermonters who wish to have unhealthy drugs. Call 264-1924. group meets monthly. Call Ai additions, remodeling, bath- at 410 Farrell St. from 73 units support around saving, budget- WEEKLY WEIGHT -LOSS support 861-6000 or anne@booksbyr rooms, kitchens, carpentry, to 74 units, and 2) constructing ing, managing or investing group: Small groups. Caring NARCOTICS ANONYMOUS' plumbing, masonry, wiring, a 12' x 24' accessory structure, money. Call Diane at 802-860- atmosphere. Get great results group of recovering addicts renewable energy systems.. Fully Farrell St. 1417 x104 for information. using natural, proven, safe Live without the use of drug insured. Extensive references. ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS, Big methods. No unhealthy dieting. costs nothing to join. The c 518-425-0094. 4. Final plat application #SD-06- book text, Mondays, 8:30-9:30 Call 264-1924. requirement for membership GREEN MOUNTAIN PAINTERS: 36 of Magic Hat Brewing Co to a.m. Overeaters Anonymous, FAMILY AND FRIENDS SUP- desire to stop using. Info, E Professional exterior amend a previously approved Tuesdays, 2:30-3:30 p.m. PORT GROUP: If someone in 4516, or visit www.together painting/staining. Free esti- plan for a previously approved Suvivors of Incest Anonymous, your family or one of your net/-,cvana. Held in Burling mates! Fully insured. Quality planned unit development con- Wednesdays, 2:30-3:30 p.m. Al- friends is in an abusive relation- South Burlington and Colche work guaranteed. Serving the sisting of three (3) commercial Anon Family Group, Thursdays, ship, this new support group is For more information, call 8 greater Burlington area. Call and industrial buildings on two 12:30-1:30.p.m. "I Love Me", an designed especially for you. 8388 or toll -free, 1-866-972 802-654-7111. (2) parcels totaling 6.73 acres. educational support group on Info, call Women Helping 5266. JOLLY ROGER'S BOAT CLEAN- The amendment consists of self care for suvivors of domestic Battered Women 658-1996. ING: Quality boat care done by allowing overhead utility lines in and/or sexual violence. Mondays, PARENTING GROUP: 6-week friendly locals in the Chittenden place of underground lines, 5 5:30-7 p.m. Call AWARE, 802- group for people parenting chil- county area. Call today for an Bartlett Bay Road. 472-6463, 88 High Street, dren of all ages now forming. estimate. 802-324-7985. John Dinkla e, Chairman Hardwick. Please call RiverValley Associates 9 for more information. 651-7520. South Burlington Development Review Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. May 17, 2006 I � CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6' May 17, 2Oo6 Munson Earth Moving 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 Dear Property Owner: ko�n Uf b�u Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." Please call our office at 846-41o6 if you have any questions. Sincerely, n l� l Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: O'Brien Brothers Agency Scott Homsted, Krebs & Lansing ( CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTLI DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (8o2)846-4io6 May 17, 20o6 Chase Properties & Development, Ltd. PO Box 2283 South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4lo6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, C6z6—\-1 �00x* Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Permit Number SD- alp CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax# Munson Earth Moving Corp. 29 Colton Place Williston, Vermont 05495 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) ) Book 651 Page 157 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) O'Brien Brothers Agency Inc. P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 (802) 658-5000 (p) (802) 658-5002 (f) 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Scott Homsted Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, Vermont 05446 (802) 878-0375 (p) (802) 878-9618 (f) 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS • 472 Meadowland Drive South Burlington, Vermont 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1705-00107 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) There is no existing use on this property. b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Anticipated use of property is up to 20% for general office (10,000 s.f.) and 80% (40,000 s.f.) for other approved activities including: Contractor or building trade facility Light Manufacturing Manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components Printing & binding production facilities Research facility or laboratory c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) The proposed building is 50,000 Square Feet d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) The proposed building will be single story. The elevation for the building will be 35 feet. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not Applicable f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) : 30 office employees + 40 non -office employees = 70 total employees. No more than 20 company vehicles proposed. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Not Applicable h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. Not Applicable 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 0 % Proposed 14.3 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 % Proposed 38.4 % c) Front yard (along each street) 2 L\ C4 Existing 0 % Proposed 29.9 % 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (Including interior renovations) b) Landscaping: $ 27,500 $ $1,500,1100 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) Parking lots, circulation roads, utilities, stormwater detention, gradinL: $500,000. 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) 389 VTE b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) 53 VTE c) P.M. peak hour for entire property (in and out) 55 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Fall 2006 14) PLEASE LIST ABUTTING LANDOWNERS, INCLUDING THOSE ACROSS THE STREET. You may attach a separate sheet. The owners of record is provided on a separate attached sheet. 15) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). 3 05/09/2006 13:04 8028659125 I.S C- KI'At SO BURLINGTON REALTY 7 71 Date ROP R 5i.c- i PAGE 01 From pr7e 4 Phone, AF Fax # Fax # I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my know]edge. 1 S IGNATI ' OF APPLICANT NATURWFIROMRTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Director, Planning & Zoning 1 have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: omplete Incomplete Planning & Zorung or Designee Date 4 Permit Number SD-_W-� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) Munson Earth Moving Corp. 29 Colton Place Williston, Vermont 05495 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 651 Page 157 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) O'Brien Brothers Agency Inc. P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 (802) 658-5000 (p) (802) 658-5002 (f) 4) CONTACT PERSON (Person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Scott Homsted Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, Vermont 05446 (802) 878-0375 (p) (802) 878-9618 (f) 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 472 Meadowland Drive South Burlington, Vermont 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1705-00107 1 r 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use There is no existing use on this property. b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Anticipated use of property is up to 20% for general office (10,000 s.f.) and 80% (40,000 s.f.) for other approved activities including: Contractor or building trade facility Light Manufacturing Manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components Printing & binding production facilities Research facility or laboratory c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) The proposed building is 50,000 Square Feet d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) The proposed building will be single story. The elevation for the building will be 35 feet. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not Applicable f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) 30 office employees + 40 non -office employees = 70 total employees. No more than 20 company vehicles proposed. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Not Applicable h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc._ Not Applicable 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? Yes b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or there associated 50' buffers? No. 2 i c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: 1. a site specific wetlands delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALI, information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel 8.0 acres/ 848,480 s.f. (acres/sq.ft.) b) Building Coverage: Existing 0 square feet 0 % Proposed 50,000 square feet 14.3 % c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 square feet 0 % Proposed 133,808 square feet 38.4 % d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing 0 square feet 0 % Proposed 5,379 square feet 29.9 % 10) AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 233,500 sq.ft.* *Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 11) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking Not Applicable 12) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) $ 1,500,000 b) Landscaping: $ 27,500 3 R c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) Parking lots, circulation roads, utilities, stormwater detention, grading: S500,000. 13) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) 389 trip ends/day b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) 53 a.m. peak hour trip ends c) P.M. peak hour for entire property (in and out) 55 p.m. peak hour trip ends 14) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: _ 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 15) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday 16) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Fall 2006 17) ABUTTING LANDOWNERS - please list abutting landowners, including those across any streets. You may attach a separate sheet. The owners of record are provided on a separate attached sheet. 18) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). 4 05/09/2006 13:04 8028659125 SO BURLINGTON REALTY PAGE 02 W I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION REVIEW A,UTHORF Y: Development Review Board Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Incomplete & Zoning or Designee Date 4 OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES May 3, 2005 Project Parcel Michael Gravelin Munson Earth Moving 1060 Hinesburg Road 85 Shunpike Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Williston, VT 05495 Tax Map 0860-10700 Tax Map 1705-00107 Malcolm Willard Abutters 699 Nob Hill Chase Properties & Development, Ltd Williston, VT 05495 PO Box 2283 Tax Map 0860-01100 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0254-00005 James C. and Sachi H. Rowley 1160 Hinesburg Road Green Acres, Inc. South Burlington, VT 05403 PO Box 2123 Tax Map 0860-01160 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0860-R1150 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street Summer Ice Joint Venture South Burlington, VT 05403 153 Summit Street Tax Map 0860-01175 Burlington, VT 05401 Tax Map 1705-00125 Bradley C. Gardner (All under 0860-01150) P.O. Box 21 Colchester, VT 05446 Scott L. & Roberta S. Pennington Tax Map 0860-01398 26 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Nancy and Gary Lines Tax Map 1002-00026 16 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Larry W. & Ginette D. Brainard Tax Map 1002-00016 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Christopher L. and Theri Davis Tax Map 1002-00028 18 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Burlington Properties LTD Tax Map 1002-00018 c/o Dan Kalman P.O. Box 9210 Kathryn and Mark Boucher South Burlington, VT 05407 20 Knoll Circle Tax Map 0860-01020 South Burlington, VT 05403 OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES May 3, 2005 Nancy G. and Terrance J. Sheahan 24 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00024 Homer and Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-01375 The Rock of Burlington P.O. Box 464 Milton, VT 05468 Tax Map 0257-0046 KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375 May 8, 2006 Fax (802) 878-9618 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Meadowlands Business Complex 472 Meadowland Drive - South Burlington, Vermont Dear Ray, Please find attached a site plan application, plans and fee for the property located at 472 Meadowland Drive in South Burlington. This project has been named Meadowlands Business Complex, and is Lot 2 of the existing Meadowland Industrial Park. The applicant, O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc., proposes a 50,000 square foot building, with up to 20% (10,000 s.f.) proposed for general office use and the remaining 80% (40,000 s.f.) proposed for a variety of uses allowed in the Industrial and Open Space Zoning District. The new building will be served by a 24' wide access drive from Meadowland Drive and municipal water and sanitary sewer connections. A stormwater collection, treatment, and detention system has been designed for the project in accordance with the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual for Watershed Improvement Permits. Please review the plans and application at your earliest convenience and contact us with any questions or comments you may have. Sincerely, Scott Homsted swh enclosure cc: Patrick O'Brien 05146-ray-1)d Cathyann LaRose From: Patrick O'Brien [patrick@obrienbrothersagency.com] Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:27 AM To: 'Cathyann LaRose' Subject: RE: Tuesday's meeting Cathyann, Thank you for sending it along. I do have one big question for now The project description states that this development consists of a 50,000 s.f. "contractor of building trade facility" while that is true, I am also anticipating that there will be some other uses there as well. As I indicated on our application the proposed uses include: Contractor or building trade facility, light manufacturing, manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components, printing & binding production facilities and research facility or laboratory. I previously discussed with Ray that this was an umbrella type of application. The idea is that this is a spec building and I therefore need to build in some flexibility with the approved uses. We agreed that as long as the use is an approved use under the umbrella approval (whether they are a contractor or laboratory) they would not have to go back to the board for approval. I do understand that they would still need to receive administrative approval for their proposed use, and I have made a Zoning Use Compliance Request Form for each user to complete and send to your department. Ray has reviewed this form. I may be concerned about this for nothing, as you may already understand all of this, but I am a bit nervous because there was no mention of an umbrella permit in the staff notes. Maybe there does not need to be? Please advise. Thank you, Patrick From: Cathyann LaRose [mailto:clarose@sburl.com] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 11:45 AM To: patrick@obrienbrothersagency.com Subject: Tuesday's meeting Attached is the agenda and staff notes for your project. It may seem like quite a few numbered items but most are standard or small housekeeping items. I'll be here all day if you have comments. 6/5/2006 SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 May 18, 2oo6 Patrick O'Brien O'Brien Brothers Agency PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: Minutes — 472 Meadowland Drive Dear Patrick: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved minutes from the April 18, 20o6 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, �B' I'C Betsy Mc onough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. ` DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOAIL (5 18 APRIL 2006 Ms. Quimby then moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-06-18 of Harry Loso subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Site Plan Application #SP-06-17 of Ann Roche Casual Furniture, Inc., to amend a previously approved plan for an 8400 sq. ft. building used for auto service. The amendment consists of converting 4484 sq. ft. from auto service to retail use, 45 Green Mountain Drive: Mr. Roche said they are just changing the use of part of the building to retail. Mr. Belair said staff has no issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-06-17 of Ann Roche Casual Furniture subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-06-14 of Eighty Midas Drive, LLC, for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing a 2526 sq. ft. general office building, and 2) constructing an 8,480 sq. ft. general office building including a drive-in bank, 80 Midas Drive: Mr. Vock said lighting, landscaping, and circulation recommendations have been incorporated into the plan. The Fire Chief is OK with the circulation. Mr. Vock indicated that with regard to electric service, a transformer has been moved. He indicated the new location on the plan. Mr. Dinklage stressed that employees and customers must park on this site. If there is a problem, the applicant will have to come back and deal with it. There is to be no parking on the Grand Union lot. The applicant attested that they will build what they have shown on the elevations. Mr. Posher, an adjoining neighbor asked about stormwater runoff. Mr. Vock said there will be no changes from what exists now. Ms. Quimby then moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-06-14 of Eighty Midas Drive subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10 Sketch Plan Application #SD-06-17 of O'Brien Brothers Agency for a planned unit development to construct a 50,000 sq. ft. contractor or building trade facility, 472 Meadowland Drive: -5- .)EVELOPMENT REVIEW BOAR. 18 APRIL 2006 Mr. O'Brien said the building will consist of 10 5,000 sq. ft. business condos. It will be of metal construction. The lot is 8.13 acres, and building coverage will be 14.3%. Front and rear yard setbacks are met as is front yard coverage. Building height will be 34 feet. They are asking for no waivers. Mr. O'Brien showed 2 entrance drives, the easternmost of which is across from an existing street. There is a pedestrian easement that would be touched on a bit. Mr. O'Brien showed this on the plan. Mr. Jaeger said there might be some wiggle room to adjust the pedestrian easement. He felt they could work this out with the applicant. Mr. O'Brien said it would be possible to do just one access, but they would like to separate employee parking from deliveries and trucking. Mr. Bolton said he preferred the 2 drives as he didn't like having traffic cut across the front yard. A majority of members favored one access drive. Mr. Belair noted that with a drive around the back of the building, they could serve both sides without having to cut across the front yard. Mr. O'Brien then showed the location of the residential neighborhood. He said they have designed 2 large berms with evergreens on them as screening. Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to work closely with the neighbors and with staff to provide the best screening possible. Regarding lighting, Mr. O'Brien said there would be no pole -mounted street lights. At each entrance, there would be 4-5' bollards with lights. There would also be lights mounted on the rear of the building and small mounted tubes under entrance canopies. Additional bollard lighting would be provided on parking islands for safety. Mr. O'Brien showed two possible color schemes, each with a dark green roof. Mr. Belair noted that there is a building approved to the east of this lot with restrictions on truck traffic. Members felt the same restraints should be imposed on this building. Mr. O'Brien said he didn't want to restrict the time of use of this building. Mr. Dinklage said the Board doesn't want trucks with back-up beepers or dumpster pick-up, etc., that would affect the residential neighborhood. 11. Sketch Plan Application #SD-06-18 of Super -Temp Wire & Cable for a planned unit development consisting of a 35,000 sq. ft. manufacturing facility to be constructed in two phases, Phase 1 consisting of 30,000 sq. ft. and Phase 2 consisting of 5,000 sq. ft., 104 Bowdoin Street: Mr. Marshall indicated the entrance to the business park and indicated that this development is for lot #6. Staff parking would be to the west and employee parking on the south. Mr. Marshall showed the location of landscaping. PAGE NO 1 Vermont's Most Complete �JN!SONS Landscape Resource 4S CENTER 11w 0 0 to, 472MarsballAve. Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 658'2433 Fax(80%) 808'2936 585Q0� MEADOWLANDS IHDUSTRIAL PARK NET 30 DAYS DAV 5/18/06 10:�� BROTNERS / EXP. DATE 5/19/06 DOC# 452135 C/O PAT DIDRIE4 1&55W�LISTON ROAD . * ESTIMATE * SU BURLINGTON VT 05401. (8012) �58-5000 ' ' TAX � 001 VT TAXABLE'SALES ' EST. . 4520J , SUGG 1 24 EA PNSNOIN096 PINE AUSTRIAN860' 499.99 24 .324.09,/EP 7,776. ViS� 2 9 EA GLATCSS1C250 H00EYLOCUST SHADEMASTER 2 1/2-3" 549.99 9 275.00 /EA 2.475 00 S. 3 3 EA PCAPNGL1H096 SPRUCE COLORAD0 BLUE 8-10' 499.99 3 324.00 /EA 972.00 S 4 15 [A PCAA81H072 SPRUCE NORWAY 6-71 299.99 15 194.00 /EA 2,910.00 S 5 4 EA MLSHBDW1C250 CRABAPPLE DONALD WYMAN 2 1/2-3" 499.99 4 250.00 /EA 1,000.00 S 6 18 EA THJOC2H048 CEDAR EASTERN WHITE 4-5' CONTAIN 99.99 10 64.99 /EA 649.98 S 7 8 9 TREE SUBTOTAL: ~ 15,782.9B 10 | 11 ! ' 12 � EA E��RB� INSTALL EVERGREEN�101 2�.80 27 175.50 /EA 4,738.50 *N 15 EA [V[RGREEN6 INSTALL EVERGREEN 6-7L56.00 0 K13 J. 10 EA CE0AR4 INSTALL 4-5' CEDAR / ARB 70.00 10 52.50 /EA 525.00 N 15 13 EA TRE[250 INSTALL TREE 2 1/2-3" 250.00 13 187.50 /EA 2,437.50 @ 16 5 EA TRKSBURLINGT0W DELIVERY SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 66.00 /EA 330.00 * 17 18 19 INSTALLATI8N 'SUBTOTAL: 9,786.B3 20 K Received by - TAXABLE 16112.90 NOW -TAXABLE 9456.09 **BTIPIATE **BTIMATE ** ESTIMATE **BTI��� SUBTOTAL 27568.90 TAX AMOUNT 1127.901 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: April 10, 2006 \drb\sub\munson\sketch2_obrien Application received: March 24, 2006 PUD- 472 Meadowland Drive SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-06-17 Agenda # 10 Meeting Date: April 18, 2006'lk�c� t Applicant Owner O'Brien Brothers Partnership Munson Earth Moving Corp PO Box 2184 85 Shunpike Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Williston, VT 05495 Engineer Property Information Ian Jewkes Tax Parcel 1155-00472-C Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. Hinesburg Road North View Protection overlay 164 Main Street District Colchester, VT 05446 8.13 acres Location Ma CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\m unson\sketch O'Brien Brothers Partnership, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking sketch plan review for a planned unit development consisting of a 50,000 sq. ft. contractor or building trade facility, 472 Meadowland Drive. A previous sketch plan was held for a very similar proposal on this site on September 6, 2005 (minutes attached) Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on March 24, 2006 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements {O Zoning District, ` . Required :.Proposed,, Min. Lot Size 3 acres 8.13 acres Max. Density n/a n/a Max. Building Coverage 30% 14.3% Max. Overall Coverage 50% 36.3% Min. Front Setback 50 ft. 50 ft. Min. Side Setback 35 ft. >35 ft. Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. 200 ft. Max. Building Height 35 ft. # ' < 7- Front Yard Coverage 30% 14.9% zoning compliance n/a no residential units proposed # the applicant has not stated the height of the building 1. The applicant should provide the height of the proposed building from the average pre - construction grade. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\m unson\sketch According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. The entire meadowland Business Park has been preliminarily approved for water allocation. However, the applicant shall still submit plans and requests to the South Burlington Water Department for review to ensure compliance with the initial approval. 2. The South Burlington Water Department should review the plans prior to preliminary plat approval. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The original subdivision received a 51,272 gpd sewer allocation which is still in effect. TO date there is 48,380 gpd available. 3. The preliminary plat application shall include the sewer allocation request. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The applicant has not yet submitted grading and erosion control plans. 4. The applicant shall submit grading and erosion control plans as part of preliminary plat application. 5. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. There are major issues with the access to this property which need to be addressed. Access to this property is proposed via two (2) 24' access drives off of Meadowland Drive. Both of these access drives are proposed for ingress and egress. The two proposed access drives are not in compliance with Section 15.12(F) of the Land Development Regulations that states that entrances to PUDs and subdivisions generally be separated by a minimum distance of four hundred feet (400). The plans currently depict the entrances as being approximately 250 feet apart. The Development Review Board discussed this matter at a previous sketch plan review on September 6, 2005 (minutes attached). At that time, the Board stated that they would have problems with 2 accesses and the applicant stated that they would try to do it with one. The newly submitted sketch plan continues to show two. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\sketch 6. The Development Review Board shall advise as to the appropriate number, location and spacing of the access drives to this property. Of the two access drives, the one proposed to the east falls directly over part of the 20 foot pedestrian easement. For a variety of reasons, including pedestrian safety, the access drive should not conflict with the existing pedestrian easement. 7. The plans shall be revised to remove all conflicts with the pedestrian easement on the property. In no case shall any access drive or parking lot traverse the pedestrian easement. The access drives and related parking lots do not currently connect. The City Engineer and Staff feel that the drives should be connected at the southern end of the property with a minimum of an emergency gravel drive to facilitate emergency access and circulation. At the previous sketch plan review, the DRB echoed this opinion. The South Burlington Fire Department should review the plans and comment on this matter. 8. The Development Review Board shall advise as to a connection of the driveways at the Southern edge of the property. The applicant shall adhere to this decision. 9. The South Burlington Fire Department shall review the plans prior to preliminary plat approval. According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, the 50,000 square feet of contractor or building trade facility is estimated to generate 22 P.M. peak hour tip ends. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The subject property contains identified Class II wetlands. However, as the wetlands shown on the site plan do not match those shown on the city's official map, the applicant shall submit a plan showing all wetlands delineations. The wetlands delineations shall have been prepared by a certified environmental engineer or other suitable environmental professional. 10. The applicant shall submit a plan showing field -delineated wetlands on the subject property as part of the preliminary plat application. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. According to Section 6.04(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Industrial -Open Space 10 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and Burlington International Airport. The 10 District regulations and standards are intended to allow high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open character of the district, minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and enhance the visual quality of approaches to the City while providing suitable locations for employment and business growth. The location and architectural design of buildings in a manner that preserves these qualities is strongly encouraged. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\sketch Staff feels the proposed project is in compliance with the stated purpose of the 10 District, as outlined in the Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. There are significant portions of open space running along the southern portions of the property, so staff feels this requirement is met. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. Staff has already stated that the Fire Chief shall review the plans. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the southern and eastern side of the proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian and recreation traffic through the property. However, as staff already noted, the plan submitted shows an access drive over the pedestrian easement. That drive will need to be relocated. 11. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The subdivision plans for the entire Meadowland Business Park show details on street utilities, lighting, and stormwater management. These have been approved by the City Engineer, so they are acceptable for the proposed project. A lighting point by point plan for the proposed project shall be submitted for this proposal, and shall meet the requirements in Appendices A.9 and A.10 of the Land Development Regulations. In addition, the applicant should submit exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the proposed lighting on the subject parcel. The proposed lighting fixtures shall be in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. 12. The applicant shall submit plans showing proposed lighting locations and details (cut -sheets) as part of the preliminary plat application. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed development of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\sketch SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations, any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the southern and eastern side of the proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian and recreation traffic through the property. However, as staff already noted, the plans submitted show an access drive over the pedestrian easement. That drive will need to be relocated. i - According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the 50,000 square feet of contractor or building trade facility will require 25 spaces plus one space for each employee. The number of employees is unknown at this time. This information should be included with the preliminary plat submittal. (I-�rhe3applicant should submit information pertaining to the number of employees as part of preliminary plat application. According to Table 13-7 of the Land Development Regulations, a property with 26-50 parking spaces requires two (2) handicapped -accessible parking spaces. The plans depict four handicapped -accessible spaces. The dimensions of the proposed parking areas appear to meet the requirements in Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is depicted on the plans. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The majority of the proposed parking is located to the side of the building. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. Again, the applicant should state the height of the proposed buildin The proposed project is located in a business park in a area where i I uses exists, so staff feels the scale of the proposed building is compatible with existing buitdings in the area. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \d rb\sub\m u n son\s ketch Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant has not yet submitted elevations of the proposed building. 14. The applicant shall submit elevations of the proposed building as part of the preliminary plat application. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant has not yet submitted elevations of the proposed building. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Because the project is in a large lot, industrial area, staff does not feel access to adjacent properties is necessary. However, the Development Review Board should consider the two curb cuts off of Meadowland Drive proposed as part of this project. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans show dumpsters to be typical of each unit. Those dumpsters shall be shown to be adequately screened. 15. The plans shall be revised to depict all dumpsters as adequately screened. Landscaping and Screening Requirements CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \d rb\sub\m u n son\s ketch The applicant has not yet submitted cost projections for this property. The applicant has not yet submitted landscaping plans for the property. 16. The applicant shall submit building costs as part of the preliminary plat application. 17. The applicant shall submit a landscaping plan for the subject property, prepared in accordance with Section 13.06 of the SBLDR, as part of the preliminary plat application. 18. The applicant shall submit a landscaping budget for the subject property, in compliance with Table 13-9 of the SBLDR, as part of the preliminary plat application. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area with twenty-eight (28) or more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. All interior and perimeter planting shall be protected by curbing. Interior planted islands shall have a minimum dimension of six (6) feet on any one side, and shall have a minimum square footage of sixty (60) feet. Large islands are encouraged. This parking lot contains more than 28 spaces and shall be in compliance with the above. 19. The landscaping plan submitted as part of the preliminary plat application shall conform to Section 13.06(B) of the SBLDR. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans depict adequate snow storage areas. Pursuant to Section 13.06(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any utility cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board. 20. The plans shall be revised to depict any utility cabinets on the site. They shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board prior to final plat approval. View Protection Zone The subject property is located within the Hinesburg Road -North Scenic View Protection Overlay District and thus subject to Section 10.03(H) of the SBLDR. Specifically, no part of any structure within the zone shall exceed an elevation of 393.5 feet above mean sea level plus 5.8 feet for each 1000 feet that said part of said structure is horizontally distant from the Hinesburg Road -North View Protection Zone Base Line shown on the Scenic View Protections Overlay District Map. 21. The applicant shall submit building elevations as part of the preliminary plat application. The building elevations shall include the height of the building in relation to mean sea level as well as the horizontal distance of the building from the Hinesburg Road -North View Protection Zone Base Line, in compliance with Section 10.03(H) of the SBLDR. Other CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\sketch The City Engineer reviewed the previously submitted plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated August 25, 2005 (attached). He has not yet reviewed the sketch plan submitted as part of this application. 22. The City Engineer shall review the preliminary plat plan and provide comment. 23. The plat plan for the entire Meadowland Business Park PUD shall be submitted as part of the preliminary plat application. The subject property is located within the Industrial Open Space District and as such shall be subject to Section 6.04(F) and 6.05 of the SBLDR. All lots of three acres or more, an open space buffer strip no less than two hundred (200) feet in width shall be maintained along the boundary of the SEQ district. The proposed building is exactly 200 feet from the SEQ boundary. At the discretion of the Development Review Board, the buffer strip either shall be left in its open, natural condition or shall be required to be landscaped in accordance with the standards in Section 3.06(I) to provide appropriate screening of proposed uses from adjacent residential properties. This property does abut residential properties. At this time, the applicant is proposing a significantly sized landscaping berm to be placed at the corner most adjacent to those residential properties. The berm is proposed to be 15 feet in height at its highest point and roughly 160 feet in length. Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document before continuing on to preliminary plat submission. Respectfully submitted, /,W-1 Y-Z-, Cathya L'i ose, Associate Planner Copy to: Munson Earth Moving, property owner O'Brien Brothers Partnership, applicant Ian A. Jewkes, Krebs and Lansing DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARu 6 SEPTEMBER 2005 Mr. Larkin affirmed that RV storage will not be allowed in this development. Ms. Murdock noted they are requesting a parking waiver from 135 to 122 spaces. Mr. Dinklage said this would be at their risk. Mr. Larkin said he would build more if needed. Members were OK with 4-story buildings. 5. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application #SD-05-45 of J. Larry and Leslie Williams to subdivide a 7.97 acre parcel developed with a single family dwelling into four lots ranging in size from 3.98 acres to 1.04 acres,1630 Dorset Street: Ms. Quimby moved to continue Preliminary plat application 4SD-05-45 until 20 September. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Sketch plan application #SD-05-72 of O'Brien Brothers Partnership for a planned unit development consisting of a 50,000 sq. ft. building under an umbrella approval for a multiple number of uses, 472 Meadowland Drive: Mr. O'Brien showed the location of the property in relation to surrounding properties. Mr. Dinklage noted this is the same property on which the Spencer Terminal project had been proposed. Mr. O'Brien said the property slopes gently down to the stream and there are new immature plantings on a berm. The proposal is to erect a pre-engineered, metal building, 120'A15'. The west side of the building would have a single entrance for customer parking. The second entrance would be mostly for employees and deliveries. A similar building is now located in Production Park in Williston. This would be a commercial condo project of 10 units. Mr. Belair reminded members that entrances to a PUD must be at least 400 feet apart and these are not. Mr. O'Brien said they want 2 accesses to keep the 2 kinds of traffic separated. Mr. Dinklage said the Board would have a problem with 2 accesses. Mr. O'Brien said they would try to do it with one. Mr. Kupferman was concerned with the condo concept. He- said the fronts of the buildings look great, but the backs look awful in the other location. Mr. Dinklage asked about a gravel path in back for emergency vehicles. Mr. O'Brien felt that didn't make sense. Mr. Dinklage said they would have to work this out with the Fire Chief. Mr. Belair said there are 2 dead-end driveways. He felt they should be connected. -4- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 6 SEPTEMBER 2005 Mr. O'Brien noted they have been allocated 94 trip ends by Randy Munson. Mr. Belair said they would have to pay the fee for 94. Mr. O'Brien then showed where they would be adding more parking spaces. Mr. Dinklage said the Board can't grant a waiver for the number of spaces the applicant is requesting. Mr. O'Brien said they would ask for less of a waiver. Mr. Belair reminded the applicant that the Board would not allow any mix of uses that would need more parking than approved. Mr. O'Brien raised the possibility of a mezzanine level. Mr. Dinklage said they would have to address all other issues that go along with the added square footage. Mr. O'Brien said there would .be no lighting at the end of the building facing residential neighbors and no parking lot lights. Any lighting will be building -mounted. As far as uses, Mr. O'Brien said they are thinking of service -oriented uses, but these are not allowed, so light manufacturing and general office uses are being requested. They won't ask for a retail outlet. Ms. Lee asked what kind of truck traffic there would be, how loud, how often, and what time of day. Mr. O'Brien said he didn't know. Ms. Lee said neighbors would want limits. Mr. Dinklage suggested the applicant meet with neighbors and come up with a list of conditions that can be agreed upon. 7. Public Hearing: Appeal #AO-05-03 of Wesco, Inc., appealing decision of Administrative Officer to issue a Sign Warning Notice on 7/15/05 for a sign violation at 1118 Williston Road: Mr. Belair explained how the Sign Ordinance is enforced via "tickets" similar to traffic tickets. The Code Officer must first issue a warning notice to give the violator a chance to comply. In this case, a 52 sq. ft. sign was placed to close to the property line. Mr. Belair said he issued a warning that indicated the sign must be moved. When it was not moved in the specified time, he issued a ticket. Mr. Heath, representing Wesco, said the sign has been in this location for a number of years. The site plan was approved with the sign in this location in 2004. An application for a sign permit was requested and approved. Mr. Simendinger asked to distribute information to the Board. Mr. Dinklage asked why that information wasn't given to Mr. Belair. Mr. Belair said the City Attorney had advised him to issue a ticket moving this out of the DRB's hands and into the court's. -5- Bill Szymanski, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-41o6 CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS Meadowland Industrial Park Lot No. 2 Meadowland Drive 8/25/05 1. Lots should be connected at least with an emergency gravel drive and serve as an access to rear hydrant. 2. The 18 inch drain pipes along the east side should be connected with an inlet or manhole and a 24 inch pipe extended easterly beyond pedestrian easement toward pond. 3. Existing street trees should be shown on the plan. J44.00' dY ROW 4fY of �iirYarg � fh Lot 1 Munson Earth Moving Corp. \ 1,1.\ 'OIL L�t.t�yj ", ! `oede 1rITa'n / Ex. 24' ADS cu/vert N 1 Lot 1E isbn9 '—_ mer /CC Joint ✓Mlure Vol 387 P.439 _ Ex. SVN /3 Ex. SMN (1 Ex. SMN H Rhim341.42' R1m-JJ9.75'-� 8" /n v. h:3J21' 1=33202' out-331.9H' _ - v. H"PUC e eodowland Drive 71— ht / — \ ✓�� ' ` ��� \�= ` II em eke�� _� Dew i / }} f /knrc Mahg: see If /// tl II�1 11it Irr� IIIII I1 III II pill, tl111l tiit ll /// /0 ! I I+ II IiF 4- n l n / �i -'�hTl N. ` i"-/ //'•__tom_ Z�— Ai ammw� Lot ?i IlulI1NI Mun earth" ��illllllit till ' All- Corp /cllllll�l\ N6drf a 851 Page 13i bsr !BAcrwqw 20Oj op-0 L .►AmAl Hcvnx & Marie Dubois ... ..". ". Vol. 179 P. 126 �.rv........ J/I'kae Gw• wM ""'fare wremt --- nwr Ra wee this Ae D'tofa Rhl=34102' Scott d Roberto Larry d Cfnette "=19 Broinwd V. 209 1.9 Vol. 211 P.282 // ! j Existing Pond fl Bqh p1 O V CLASS 1 I N3 I 1 I I � ' i,u, I I 1 � 1 1 - thous sAf I I Delos -End rnw I few g Lot 5 Summer /ro Joint Venture ` y / Vd. 387 P. 4J9 q 1 II 1 1 V III `I I �� Notes.•_ I 1 1. This B not o baundry n, y pmpi ty rhes mown ore ,FPi en, / entided Vie dWNmd Hushese Pm-* - 5ubdi ipr pot" by T ddI / Crew/thg En9kheenc of S datM Apr/ . 1996• re old h Volume _W Page A4 h the ptY rh Budhgton Land Rettrd f ' �/ nw ccqqnn bvarhn Detos 655.63' RECEIVED MAR 2 4 2006 city of so. Burlington Location Mao Owner Information: Applicant Inftvmotion: Munson Earth Moving Corp. 09rien Brothers Agency Inc. 85 Shunpike Rood P.O. Bow 2184 WNW—, VT 05495 South Bud/ngtav, VT 05403 Arens• ratal area — 800 ones (J48,480 sq. ft.) Zonino.' Industrial and Open Space Zoning District Lot Comraae Erhrh eigd a If ar MIA ExAth Povsmant 0'f. as, I NIA Bu'd 5e4 q7a sf. J413S ,SOS Povemen k' 76802'f. 22aw A Toed C. J1ge02'a .7 3 SO.e F?eeti co 149� Pork/no 40,000 sq.1t. Wamhouse/Distrlbut/on e 1 space/2,000 q.ft. > 20 spaces 10,000 sgft. Ofrlce space a .i.5 spaces/1,000 sq.R. _ .i5 spaces rofol Spaces Required - 55 spaces Proposed Pm*k?.q Spaces — 87 (Ind./4 honefioopped) Leoend i —I— srwy emend poser Agoerty Lhe ar Right of e., —M4— E harp ground [amour m E 'arhg sewer mama. p E Mhg mtdh boe/n s— E sthg w- sewx lino -- -- Enstmg infer/he �y eye C.' ign hAteht /worm- hdw • — • — Ew rhg fence rYVWYI E Mhg woad /he -----y}�__--- New Mished grade Q e New /umhoke New —tmrous Of f-.. s s er New cnnstrochm li f—Ing a' m, 40' BO' 120' 160, Bar Sca/e 1" = 40• FOR PERMIT REVIEW Date Tensed Description checked Dote Design M✓ Drawn fMP/SINi Site Plan Checked Lot rD Sole _ 47 ?006 Date FaWhiary J7, McOdOwIcnd industrioi Park Project 05146 Mead—Adind Drive South Burh'ngt—, Vermont XRZBS @' LANSINC Consulting Afngineers, Inc. w 164 Alain Street Colchester, Vermont 05446 __ _........... 0 r�3e c-n CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6(—Q—Ar-�N DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 April 6, 2006 Munson Earth Moving Corp. 29 Colton Place Williston, VT 05495 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a draft agenda for the April 18, 20o6 Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, 4etq K L Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 �I April 14, 2oo6 Patrick O'Brien PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: Meadowland Drive Dear Mr. O'Brien: 49 J1141((0# Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, April 18, 20o6 at 7:30 P.M. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Cf _ii— _. Betsy cD Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Page 1 of 1 J �) Betsy McDonough From: Betsy McDonough [emcdonough@sburl.com] Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 8:49 AM To: Krebs & Lansing o Cc:'patrick@obrienbrothersagency.com' t� copy Subject: For Scott H - O'Brien Meadowland Drive STaff Comments Hi Scott — Attached are staff comments to the Board regarding the O'Brien project on Meadowland Drive. Please be sure someone is at the meeting at 7:30. If you have any questions, please let us know. -Betsy Betsy McDonough South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 4/17/2006 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: April 10, 2006 \drb\sub\munson\sketch2_obrien Application received: March 24, 2006 PUD- 472 Meadowland Drive SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-06-17 da # 10 Applicant O'Brien Brothers Partnership PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05403 Meeting Date: April 18, 2006 Engineer Ian Jewkes Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Location Map Owner Munson Earth Moving Corp 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 Property Information Tax Parcel 1155-00472-C Hinesburg Road North View Protection overlay District 8.13 acres CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\sketch O'Brien Brothers Partnership, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking sketch plan review for a planned unit development consisting of a 50,000 sq. ft. contractor or building trade facility, 472 Meadowland Drive. A previous sketch plan was held for a very similar proposal on this site on September 6, 2005 (minutes attached) Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on March 24, 2006 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Re uirements 10 Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 3 acres 8.13 acres Max. Density n/a n/a Max. Building Coverage 30% 14.3% Max. Overall Coverage 50% 36.3% Min. Front Setback 50 ft. 50 ft. Min. Side Setback 35 ft. >35 ft. Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. 200 ft. Max. Building Height 35 ft. # Front Yard Coverage 30% 14.9% zoning compliance n/a no residential units proposed # the applicant has not stated the height of the building 1. The applicant should provide the height of the proposed building from the average pre - construction grade. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\sketch According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. The entire meadowland Business Park has been preliminarily approved for water allocation. However, the applicant shall still submit plans and requests to the South Burlington Water Department for review to ensure compliance with the initial approval. 2. The South Burlington Water Department should review the plans prior to preliminary plat approval. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The original subdivision received a 51,272 gpd sewer allocation which is still in effect. TO date there is 48,380 gpd available. 3. The preliminary plat application shall include the sewer allocation request. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The applicant has not yet submitted grading and erosion control plans. 4. The applicant shall submit grading and erosion control plans as part of preliminary plat application. 5. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. There are major issues with the access to this property which need to be addressed. Access to this property is proposed via two (2) 24' access drives off of Meadowland Drive. Both of these access drives are proposed for ingress and egress. The two proposed access drives are not in compliance with Section 15.12(F) of the Land Development Regulations that states that entrances to PUDs and subdivisions generally be separated by a minimum distance of four hundred feet (400). The plans currently depict the entrances as being approximately 250 feet apart. The Development Review Board discussed this matter at a previous sketch plan review on September 6, 2005 (minutes attached). At that time, the Board stated that they would have problems with 2 accesses and the applicant stated that they would try to do it with one. The newly submitted sketch plan continues to show two. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\sketch 6. The Development Review Board shall advise as to the appropriate number, location and spacing of the access drives to this property. Of the two access drives, the one proposed to the east falls directly over part of the 20 foot pedestrian easement. For a variety of reasons, including pedestrian safety, the access drive should not conflict with the existing pedestrian easement. 7. The plans shall be revised to remove all conflicts with the pedestrian easement on the property. In no case shall any access drive or parking lot traverse the pedestrian easement. The access drives and related parking lots do not currently connect. The City Engineer and Staff feel that the drives should be connected at the southern end of the property with a minimum of an emergency gravel drive to facilitate emergency access and circulation. At the previous sketch plan review, the DRB echoed this opinion. The South Burlington Fire Department should review the plans and comment on this matter. 8. The Development Review Board shall advise as to a connection of the driveways at the Southern edge of the property. The applicant shall adhere to this decision. 9. The South Burlington Fire Department shall review the plans prior to preliminary plat approval. According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7ch Edition, the 50,000 square feet of contractor or building trade facility is estimated to generate 22 P.M. peak hour tip ends. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The subject property contains identified Class II wetlands. However, as the wetlands shown on the site plan do not match those shown on the city's official map, the applicant shall submit a plan showing all wetlands delineations. The wetlands delineations shall have been prepared by a certified environmental engineer or other suitable environmental professional. 10. The applicant shall submit a plan showing field -delineated wetlands on the subject property as part of the preliminary plat application. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning districts) in which it is located. According to Section 6.04(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Industrial -Open Space l0 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and Burlington International Airport. The 10 District regulations and standards are intended to allow high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open character of the district, minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and enhance the visual quality of approaches to the City while providing suitable locations for employment and business growth. The location and architectural design of buildings in a manner that preserves these qualities is strongly encouraged. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\sketch Staff feels the proposed project is in compliance with the stated purpose of the 10 District, as outlined in the Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. There are significant portions of open space running along the southern portions of the property, so staff feels this requirement is met. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. Staff has already stated that the Fire Chief shall review the plans. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the southern and eastern side of the proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian and recreation traffic through the property. However, as staff already noted, the plan submitted shows an access drive over the pedestrian easement. That drive will need to be relocated. 11. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The subdivision plans for the entire Meadowland Business Park show details on street utilities, lighting, and stormwater management. These have been approved by the City Engineer, so they are acceptable for the proposed project. A lighting point by point plan for the proposed project shall be submitted for this proposal, and shall meet the requirements in Appendices A.9 and A.10 of the Land Development Regulations. In addition, the applicant should submit exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the proposed lighting on the subject parcel. The proposed lighting fixtures shall be in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. 12. The applicant shall submit plans showing proposed lighting locations and details (cut -sheets) as part of the preliminary plat application. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed development of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\sketch SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the southern and eastern side of the proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian and recreation traffic through the property. However, as staff already noted, the plans submitted show an access drive over the pedestrian easement. That drive will need to be relocated. According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the 50,000 square feet of contractor or building trade facility will require 25 spaces plus one space for each employee. The number of employees is unknown at this time. This information should be included with the preliminary plat submittal. 13. The applicant should submit information pertaining to the number of employees as part of preliminary plat application. According to Table 13-7 of the Land Development Regulations, a property with 26-50 parking spaces requires two (2) handicapped -accessible parking spaces. The plans depict four handicapped -accessible spaces. The dimensions of the proposed parking areas appear to meet the requirements in Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is depicted on the plans. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The majority of the proposed parking is located to the side of the building. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. Again, the applicant should state the height of the proposed building. The proposed project is located in a business park in a area where industrial uses exists, so staff feels the scale of the proposed building is compatible with existing buildings in the area. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\sketch Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant has not yet submitted elevations of the proposed building. 14. The applicant shall submit elevations of the proposed building as part of the preliminary plat application. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant has not yet submitted elevations of the proposed building. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Because the project is in a large lot, industrial area, staff does not feel access to adjacent properties is necessary. However, the Development Review Board should consider the two curb cuts off of Meadowland Drive proposed as part of this project. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans show dumpsters to be typical of each unit. Those dumpsters shall be shown to be adequately screened. 15. The plans shall be revised to depict all dumpsters as adequately screened. Landscaping and Screening Requirements CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\sketch The applicant has not yet submitted cost projections for this property. The applicant has not yet submitted landscaping plans for the property. 16. The applicant shall submit building costs as part of the preliminary plat application. 17. The applicant shall submit a landscaping plan for the subject property, prepared in accordance with Section 13.06 of the SBLDR, as part of the preliminary plat application. 18. The applicant shall submit a landscaping budget for the subject property, in compliance with Table 13-9 of the SBLDR, as part of the preliminary plat application. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area with twenty-eight (28) or more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. All interior and perimeter planting shall be protected by curbing. Interior planted islands shall have a minimum dimension of six (6) feet on any one side, and shall have a minimum square footage of sixty (60) feet. Large islands are encouraged. This parking lot contains more than 28 spaces and shall be in compliance with the above. 19. The landscaping plan submitted as part of the preliminary plat application shall conform to Section 13.06(B) of the SBLDR. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans depict adequate snow storage areas. Pursuant to Section 13.06(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any utility cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board. 20. The plans shall be revised to depict any utility cabinets on the site. They shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board prior to final plat approval. View Protection Zone The subject property is located within the Hinesburg Road -North Scenic View Protection Overlay District and thus subject to Section 10.03(H) of the SBLDR. Specifically, no part of any structure within the zone shall exceed an elevation of 393.5 feet above mean sea level plus 5.8 feet for each 1000 feet that said part of said structure is horizontally distant from the Hinesburg Road -North View Protection Zone Base Line shown on the Scenic View Protections Overlay District Map. 21. The applicant shall submit building elevations as part of the preliminary plat application. The building elevations shall include the height of the building in relation to mean sea level as well as the horizontal distance of the building from the Hinesburg Road -North View Protection Zone Base Line, in compliance with Section 10.03(H) of the SBLDR. Other CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\sketch The City Engineer reviewed the previously submitted plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated August 25, 2005 (attached). He has not yet reviewed the sketch plan submitted as part of this application. 22. The City Engineer shall review the preliminary plat plan and provide comment. 23. The plat plan for the entire Meadowland Business Park PUD shall be submitted as part of the preliminary plat application. The subject property is located within the Industrial Open Space District and as such shall be subject to Section 6.04(F) and 6.05 of the SBLDR. All lots of three acres or more, an open space buffer strip no less than two hundred (200) feet in width shall be maintained along the boundary of the SEQ district. The proposed building is exactly 200 feet from the SEQ boundary. At the discretion of the Development Review Board, the buffer strip either shall be left in its open, natural condition or shall be required to be landscaped in accordance with the standards in Section 3.06(I) to provide appropriate screening of proposed uses from adjacent residential properties. This property does abut residential properties. At this time, the applicant is proposing a significantly sized landscaping berm to be placed at the corner most adjacent to those residential properties. The berm is proposed to be 15 feet in height at its highest point and roughly 160 feet in length. Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document before continuing on to preliminary plat submission. Respectfully submitted, IWI,7� Cathyao LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Munson Earth Moving, property owner O'Brien Brothers Partnership, applicant Ian A. Jewkes, Krebs and Lansing ,) okmTTc DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOAR„ 6 SEPTEMBER 2005 Mr. Larkin affirmed that RV storage will not be allowed in this development. Ms. Murdock noted they are requesting a parking waiver from 135 to 122 spaces. Mr. Dinklage said this would be at their risk. Mr. Larkin said he would build more if needed. Members were OK with 4-story buildings. 5. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application #SD-05-45 of J. Larry and Leslie Williams to subdivide a 7.97 acre parcel developed with a single family dwelling into four lots ranging in size from 3.98 acres to 1.04 acres,1630 Dorset Street: Ms. Quimby moved to continue Preliminary plat application #SD-05-45 until 20 September. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Sketch plan application #SD-05-72 of O'Brien Brothers Partnership for a planned unit development consisting of a 50,000 sq. ft. building under an umbrella approval for a multiple number of uses, 472 Meadowland Drive: Mr. O'Brien showed the location of the property in relation to surrounding properties. Mr. Dinklage noted this is the same property on which the Spencer Terminal project had been proposed. Mr. O'Brien said the property slopes gently down to the stream and there are new immature plantings on a berm. The proposal is to erect a pre-engineered, metal building, 120'A15'. The west side of the building would have a single entrance for customer parking. The second entrance would be mostly for employees and deliveries. A similar building is now located in Production Park in Williston. This would be a commercial condo project of 10 units. Mr. Belair reminded members that entrances to a PUD must be at least 400 feet apart and these are not. Mr. O'Brien said they want 2 accesses to keep the 2 kinds of traffic separated. Mr. Dinklage said the Board would have a problem with 2 accesses. Mr. O'Brien said they would try to do it with one. Mr. Kupferman was concerned with the condo concept. He said the fronts of the buildings look great, but the backs look awful in the other location. Mr. Dinklage asked about a gravel path in back for emergency vehicles. Mr. O'Brien felt that didn't make sense. Mr. Dinklage said they would have to work this out with the Fire Chief. Mr. Belair said there are 2 dead-end driveways. He felt they should be connected. M idEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOAR 6 SEPTEMBER 2005 Mr. O'Brien noted they have been allocated 94 trip ends by Randy Munson. Mr. Belair said they would have to pay the fee for 94. Mr. O'Brien then showed where they would be adding more parking spaces. Mr. Dinklage said the Board can't grant a waiver for the number of spaces the applicant is requesting. Mr. O'Brien said they would ask for less of a waiver. Mr. Belair reminded the applicant that the Board would not allow any mix of uses that would need more parking than approved. Mr. O'Brien raised the possibility of a mezzanine level. Mr. Dinklage said they would have to address all other issues that go along with the added square footage. Mr. O'Brien said there would be no lighting at the end of the building facing residential neighbors and no parking lot lights. Any lighting will be building -mounted. As far as uses, Mr. O'Brien said they are thinking of service -oriented uses, but these are not allowed, so light manufacturing and general office uses are being requested. They won't ask for a retail outlet. Ms. Lee asked what kind of truck traffic there would be, how loud, how often, and what time of day. Mr. O'Brien said he didn't know. Ms. Lee said neighbors would want limits. Mr. Dinklage suggested the applicant meet with neighbors and come up with a list of conditions that can be agreed upon. 7. Public Hearing: Appeal #AO-05-03 of Wesco, Inc., appealing decision of Administrative Officer to issue a Sign Warning Notice on 7/15/05 for a sign violation at 1118 Williston Road: Mr. Belair explained how the Sign Ordinance is enforced via "tickets" similar to traffic tickets. The Code Officer must first issue a warning notice to give the violator a chance to comply. In this case, a 52 sq. ft. sign was placed to close to the property line. Mr. Belair said he issued a warning that indicated the sign must be moved. When it was not moved in the specified time, he issued a ticket. Mr. Heath, representing Wesco, said the sign has been in this location for a number of years. The site plan was approved with the sign in this location in 2004. An application for a sign permit was requested and approved. Mr. Simendinger asked to distribute information to the Board. Mr. Dinklage asked why that information wasn't given to Mr. Belair. Mr. Belair said the City Attorney had advised him to issue a ticket moving this out of the DRB's hands and into the court's. -5- 1 Bill Szymanski, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4io6 CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS Meadowland Industrial Park Lot No. 2 Meadowland Drive 8/25/05 i. Lots should be connected at least with an emergency gravel drive and serve as an access to rear hydrant. 2. The 18 inch drain pipes along the east side should be connected with an inlet or manhole and a 24 inch pipe extended easterly beyond pedestrian easement toward pond. 3. Existing street trees should be shown on the plan. \ \ Lot ID E mM9 We,. YX Er. SMH /5 Summer Ice Joint ✓enture �REx on W336. U Ex. SM/H /2 Rim=J44.00' ✓a/. J87 P. 419 Rio=-WH -' '-'•"-- Ex. SNH 14 �- -�-- 8' /n v. in=J321' R/m=J41.42' 8' /nv. 1n=332.02' 80. ROW 8" Inv. out=J31.9 " ar--- - - - - - _ _ „y `ww Ex. 24' ADS �,,.�-'4,h At 8453f9' cu/rn-+ .EaiCEvr9 �- �_. Y..� i��•� �� - ( En'srrg ../..•' _ Sd nor .nr Carve 11 .11 J'" \ / \ \ sx\ �,/ I New cmrhoos / o - ear f— see /' CLASS // \ -/- / N 1br/r f—o'g see j I Lot 1 Munson Earth Moving coy. / \ r--�.•l�'Y ? I i j I Existing Pond �� ! _ nBD� /// owner Information: Applicant Information.- ........ . ... ... .... ..... .J I Munson Earth Moving Corp. 06rien Brothers Aganey Inc. 85 Shun /Re Road P P.O. Box 2184 W!//iston. VT 05495 South Burtmgtm, VI 0540J Arens Bvh Proposed h'uddinq Tato/ area 8.00 acres J48,460 s ft. / a / /MN Anelrq / 0- % 50,by 2)r" sq./t. d / rol l \ / 1 11 _ �\ Zoning.' Industrial and Open Space Zoning District ^� /! i Lot Coverage Finfloor ished l / nev. = JlJ5" CLASS l/ Anprwbua Arloce Awn r AN. Anowsd oa mpMw 3te2r.3r/pkd / ///-•$ / /// I I m Fianryve cawog. l4txr � o� m 1 1 Porkina 51. atoms I 4a 000 sq. ft. Warehouse/D/strlbution w I slpace/2, 000 sq. ft. - 20 spaces 10, 000 sq. ft. Office space w J 5 spaces/1, 000 sq. ft. = 35 spoces Pta/ paces Required - 55 spaces c 4 hondi —&ucwrr I / / roP 9 SP i cePPedi /=�\\� i4mr bwc4y y// � \ \\ l� OO 3 g ////_ \ \\\\ / / Lot Le end l l l / 1 T / r Summer /ce Joint ✓entum ✓ol 387 P 4" pP-wrY Lha or R19nr of *by with 3'-4� 1w-1,, 1 / �` ?9... I 1 i III 1 I II II JJ4 Ex/e(Nr9 9�'eund canravr aed odmWm. 1 1 ` I, I / Ntw moor- �/� I I 1 II �I 111 II 1 m e s(sry sewer monnde ram./oa e p e /// /1� �1 11 1 1 1 1t 1 E rera9 corm boar e ath9 Sawa one earsry were - I- e sr n r ter orbs -- / »b 11 III ' Notes _ . _.. _ E atm9 rases f h r1� %' ��V a� - = ratr/ / i //ii / i // r % % %l _-_o es.rv-rv-rv-� &iathy wood the \ / -- /\\ 1111 \1,1''re'/ / // l I a x Pm r op -�� New ssned 9raae / - - / /ii / / / L Ma m not o a«rnd y .-r /ne:.wrown ow ,toy, -1,11ed 'U odowlood 8-- Pork - Sub.V— Plot' by r dd/ U . New /unrnrode Coo-lth9 Envhe doted ApA 2; 1996, rweodad h w/vme W 11 / ^ -- _ / /// / f / Poye .A6 h Me GYfY of S M iTUNhpfan Card Recnd H--�� New —t— S#t hires New coostmctiar limit fench9 stormwater Detentlon Pond / /i/j7// / •���� - �'3.1y - �/ / ` ' 0' 20' eon 60' 120' ,60' 200' -- l� i// ///' / _�—�. •� - s / zoo• n.,a,v evm... �Al"N S See �� New dWh tot ry./ I Arhes f ! req' 20. nor. eenfhame 1 / Bar Scale 1' = 40' C—mar / / ' \\\\\\\I \\ Lot 2 ,twwke.- - — I y /ii ii/� �_Illi 11\i11 I11 1 Mun Earth Iw(v,1Ikitllil Mo ng Corp / — — FOR PERMIT REVIEW � --:—��I 1111 n 1 1 / — F �i � // /` �3se � I; I I I I I i I I ✓du a 657 Pogo 157 ember 1 00 _ Acreage: 6C0 � 3s, -- / ,ww oorhoda ear _ ,arce..aeDeras � �63 - �rrPr;a., _.---- -- - -- 1�f �"� Dot. re�as0 Des Cneckee Dore / ,LwP11 !A✓ errs and Open hoe° R E C E I Design FMP SWF Site P/on —_. 150 " = 45 S:Yaar�"' ZOII/� i elf r�gCs�Pp� Drawn _ •" Hamer d Marie Dubois 6, �u W 0.7 _. _ -. - Vol 179 P. 126 MAR Checked Lot 2 �.yyyvW'rw %'ran a0d em Now stale Merit Ex. WH /6 -�� Scale 1 = 40' hey end dom. s- Osta/s Rhr=34J.02' F.6-or" I7 2005. Meodo w/on d /n dus trial Pork Scott R Roberto Larry & Cinette p Date Pennington Brainard City of So Buflingto[ Pro'ect 05146 Meodaw/ond Drive S th Budington, ✓ ant Vol 209 P. J26 V.I. 211 P.2B2 �/ L`�' XR�9S d' L.fNSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Vain Street, Co.ehesterr, Vermont 05"6' Location Map Exht Bll a at. aw N/A Exdrh Pownanr Af Brl 1g00a N. lI.A .VA JAi Pownewr 76re0Y ef. 22AK NIA Tatd Lb 124W2 af. M-W I we Permit Number SD- 6 G - l APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) Munson Earth Moving Corp. 29 Colton Place Williston, Vermont 05495 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 651 Page 157 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) O'Brien Brothers Agency Inc. P.O. Box 2184 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Scott Homsted Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, Vermont 05446 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS ` Meadowland Drive South Burlington, Vermont 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1705-00107 .. 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) There is no existing use on this property. b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Anticipated use of property is 10,000 s.f. for offices and 40,000 s.L for warehouse distribution. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) The proposed building is 50,000 Square Feet. d) Proposed height of building (if applicable) The proposed building will be single story. The elevation for the building will be feet. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not Applicable g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Not Applicable 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 0 % Proposed 14.3 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 % Proposed 36.3 % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 0 % Proposed 14.9 % 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, right of way, etc.) Not Applicable 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) 2 03/24/2006 09:1E' 802ES59125 33 BJRLINGTON RE:A_TY PA3E 7,2 i/ts-qxa 12) QW%;ERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING .ADDRESSES (this may be provided on a separate attached sheet) The ovr nen of record is provided on a saparatt arched sheet. 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE yx i- o 14) PLANS AND FLEE Plat plans shall be submitted which gfcws the inforcnatfon listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) rrgular sim copies and one reduced copy 0 1 " z I?") ,if the plans must be submitted, A sketch subdivision application fee is $125. I hcrSby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been Submitted and i accurate to the best of my know`edge, SIGNATLME OF APPLICANT IGN t OI~ (�� HRT Y OWNER Do not write below this line DATE Of SUBMISSION � � Y16 I havr reviewed this preliminary plat application and Find it to be. Complete :1 Incomplete Dit cping & ZO g r Desti nee Date OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES March 20, 2005 Project Parcel Michael Gravelin Munson Earth Moving 1060 Hinesburg Road 85 Shunpike Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Williston, VT 05495 Tax Map 0860-10700 Tax Map 1705-00107 Malcolm Willard Abutters 699 Nob Hill Chase Properties & Development, Ltd Williston, VT 05495 PO Box 2283 Tax Map 0860-01100 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0254-00005 Michael Gravelin 1060 Hinesburg Road Green Acres, Inc. South Burlington, VT 05407 PO Box 2123 Tax Map 0860-10700 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0860-R1150 James C. and Sachi H. Rowley 1160 Hinesburg Road Summer Ice Joint Venture South Burlington, VT 05403 153 Summit Street Tax Map 0860-01160 Burlington, VT 05401 Tax Map 1705-00125 City of South Burlington (All under 0860-01150) 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Scott L. & Roberta S. Pennington Tax Map 0860-01175 26 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Bradley C. Gardner Tax Map 1002-00026 P.O. Box 21 Colchester, VT 05446 Larry W. & Ginette D. Brainard Tax Map 0860-01398 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Nancy and Gary Lines Tax Map 1002-00028 16 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Burlington Properties LTD Tax Map 1002-00016 c/o Dan Kalman P.O. Box 9210 Christopher L. and Theri Davis South Burlington, VT 05407 18 Knoll Circle Tax Map 0860-01020 South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00018 OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES March 20, 2005 Kathryn and Mark Boucher 20 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Nancy G. and Terrance J. Sheahan 24 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00024 Homer and Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-01375 ME O'BRIEN MOM S AGENCY, INC. O"BRIEN 1855 Williston Rd. BROTHERS P.O. Box2184 _...: So. Burlington, VT 05407 Tel: 802.658.5000 Fax: 802.658.5002 E-Mai a•F+�ckC�a�r�e�D�o�t,C.rsi4yeti� .�o•r, TO 0 V < LETTE OF TRANSMITTAL DATE 3 v? 6,1 JOB NO. ATTENTION REN WE ARE SENDING YOU O Attached O Under separate cover via the following items: O Shop drawings O Prints tans 0 Samples O Specifications O Copy of letter O Change order O AmIt "Ih i r p,j �D 2. Cyl� ! ji' _�� •9�/ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMI as checked below: 12 or approval O For your use O As requested O For review and comment O FORBIDS DUE REMARKS O Approved as submitted O Resubmit copies for approval O Approved as noted O Submit copies for distribution O Returned for corrections O Return corrected prints O O PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US &// GV/ 0-'& 4 COPY TO 40P/t/ J u P6 m - 5, SIGNED: It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 23, 2005 Ian Jewkes Krebs & Lansing 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Re: Minutes —472 Meadowland Drive Dear Mr. Jewkes: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the minutes from the September 6, 2005 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORRSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 1, 2005 Ian Jewkes Krebs & Lansing 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Re: 472 Meadowland Drive Dear Mr. Jewkes: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, September 6, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy M oug Planning & Zoning Assitant Encl. (), 6� - as, n - I (aA"-G T U 2(g ?&16 OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES August 3, 2005 Project Parcel Munson Earth Moving 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 Tax Map 1705-00107 Abutters Chase Properties & Development, Ltd PO Box 2283 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0254-00005 Green Acres, Inc. PO Box 2123 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0860-R1150 Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 Tax Map 1705-00125 (All under 0860-01150) Diane J. Wessel 70 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0850-00070 Scott L. & Roberta S. Pennington 26 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00026 Larry W. & Ginette D. Brainard 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00028 Donna A. Lee 30 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00030 Russell J. & Pamela A. Smith 32 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00032 Anthony A. & Diane P. Graziano 34 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00034 Paul A. & Charyl P. Houchens 36 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00036 David W. & Heather H. Main 38 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00038 John M. & Susan M. Hood 28 Dubois Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0575-00028 Robert M. & Linda H. O'Kelly 30 Dubois Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0575-00030 Ralph J. & Jeanette M. Mitchell 32 Dubois Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0575-00032 John Larkin 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-01375 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 054.03 (8o2)84.6-41o6 August 22, 2005 Munson Earth Moving 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a draft agenda for the September 6, 2005 Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Please call our office at 846-4io6 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: O'Brien Brothers Limited Partnership CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD \drb\sub\munson\sketch nda # 6 Applicant O'Brien Brothers Partnership PO Box 2184 South Burlington, VT 05403 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: August 25, 2005 Application received: August 4, 2005 PUD- 472 Meadowland Drive SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-05-72 Meeting Date: September 6, 2005 Owner Munson Earth Moving Corp 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 Engineer Ian Jewkes Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Location Map Property Information Tax Parcel 1155-00472-C Hinesburg Road North View Protection overlay District 8.13 acres CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \d rb\sub\m u nson\sketch O'Brien Brothers Partnership, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking sketch plan review for a planned unit development consisting of a 50,000 sq. ft. building under an umbrella approval for a multiple number of uses, 472 Meadowland Drive. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on August 4, 2005 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements 10 Zonin District_ Required 11 Proposed Min. Lot Size 3 acres 8.13 acres Max. Density n/a n/a Max. Building Coverage 30% 14.1 % �l Max. Overall Coverage 50% 33.5% �l Min. Front Setback 50 ft. 50 ft. �l Min. Side Setback 35 ft. >35 ft. �l Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. 200 ft. Max. Building Height 35 ft. 34 ft. �l Front Yard Coverage 30% 15.4% zoning compliance n/a no residential units proposed SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. The entire meadowland Business Park has been preliminarily approved for water allocation. However, the applicant shall still submit plans and requests to the South Burlington Water Department for review to ensure compliance with the initial approval. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\sketch 1. The South Burlington Water Department should review the plans prior to preliminary plat approval. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. 2. The applicant shall obtain preliminary wastewater capacity allocation from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hinds, prior to recording of the final plat plans. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The applicant has not yet submitted grading and erosion control plans. 3. The applicant shall submit grading and erosion control plans as part of preliminary plat application. 4. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. There are major issues with the access to this property which need to be addressed. Access to this property is proposed via two (2) access drives off of Meadowland Drive. The applicant has not indicated the width of those access drives. 5. The plans shall be revised to indicate the width of the access drives off of Meadowland Drive. Both of these access drives are proposed for ingress and egress. The two proposed access drives are not in compliance with Section 15.12(F) of the Land Development Regulations that states that entrances to PUDs and subdivisions generally be separated by a minimum distance of four hundred feet (400). The plans currently depict the entrances as being approximately 250 feet apart. The Development Review Board has discretion in this matter. 6. The Development Review Board shall advise as to the appropriate number, location and spacing of the access drives to this property. Of the two access drives, the one proposed to the east falls directly over part of the 20 foot pedestrian easement. For a variety of reasons, including pedestrian safety, the access drive shall not conflict with the existing pedestrian easement. 7. The plans shall be revised to remove all conflicts with the pedestrian easement on the property. In no case shall any access drive or parking lot traverse the pedestrian easement. ( I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \d rb\sub\m u nson\sketch The access drives and related parking lots do not currently connect. The City Engineer and Staff feel that the drives should be connected at the southern end of the property with a minimum of an emergency gravel drive to facilitate emergency access and circulation. The South Burlington Fire Department should review the plans and comment on this matter. 8. The South Burlington Fire Department shall review the plans prior to preliminary plat approval. According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 71h Edition, the 35,000 square feet of light manufacturing is estimated to generate 25.90 P.M. peak hour tip ends (Land Use 140). The 15,000 square feet of general office space is estimated to generate 22.35 P.M. peak hour trip ends (Land Use 710). Thus, the total project is estimated to generate 48.25 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The subject property contains identified Class II wetlands. However, as the wetlands shown on the site plan do not match those shown on the city's official map, the applicant shall submit a plan showing all wetlands delineations. The wetlands delineations shall have been prepared by a certified environmental engineer or other suitable environmental professional. 9. The applicant shall submit a plan showing field -delineated wetlands on the subject property as part of the preliminary plat application. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. According to Section 6.04(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the Industrial -Open Space 10 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -quality, large -lot office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial routes and Burlington International Airport. The 10 District regulations and standards are intended to allow high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open character of the district, minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and enhance the visual quality of approaches to the City while providing suitable locations for employment and business growth. The location and architectural design of buildings in a manner that preserves these qualities is strongly encouraged. Staff feels the proposed project is in compliance with the stated purpose of the 10 District, as outlined in the Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. There are significant portions of open space running along the southern portions of the property, so staff feels this requirement is met. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\sketch Staff has already stated that the Fire Chief shall review the plans. The Fire Chief is in the process of reviewing the plans. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the southern and eastern side of the proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian and recreation traffic through the property. However, as staff already noted, the plan submitted shows an access drive over the pedestrian easement. That drive will need to be relocated. 10. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The subdivision plans for the entire Meadowland Business Park show details on street utilities, lighting, and stormwater management. These have been approved by the City Engineer, so they are acceptable for the proposed project. A lighting point by point plan for the proposed project shall be submitted for this proposal, and shall meet the requirements in Appendices A.9 and A.10 of the Land Development Regulations. In addition, the applicant should submit exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the proposed lighting on the subject parcel. The proposed lighting fixtures shall be in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. 11. The applicant shall submit plans showing proposed lighting locations and details (cut -sheets) as part of the preliminary plat application. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed development of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations, any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. ( f CITY OF SOUTH BURLING TON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \d rb\sub\m u nson\sketch The subject property contains a 20' wide pedestrian easement running the southern and eastern side of the proposed building and the southerly property boundary. This is sufficient to facilitate pedestrian and recreation traffic through the property. However, as staff already noted, the plans submitted show an access drive over the pedestrian easement. That drive will need to be relocated. According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the 35,000 square feet of building dedicated to light manufacturing requires 17.5 parking spaces. The 15,000 square feet of building dedicated to office use will require 52.5 parking spaces. Thus, the proposed project will require a total of 70 parking spaces. The plans show a total of 37 parking spaces, a shortfall of 33 spaces. This would necessitate a 47% parking waiver, an amount far exceeding what the Development Review Board could grant if it so chose. Staff finds the proposed parking to be a major issue associated with this proposal. 12. The applicant shall submit revised plans that are in compliance with South Burlington parking requirements as outlined in Section 13.01 of the SBLDR. According to Table 13-7 of the Land Development Regulations, a property with 51 to 75 parking spaces requires three (3) handicapped -accessible parking spaces. The plans do not currently depict any handicapped -accessible spaces. 13. As part of the preliminary plat application, the plans shall be revised to depict the appropriate number of handicapped -accessible parking spaces in accordance with Table 13-7 of the SBLDR. Furthermore, those spaces shall be shown in compliance with Section 13.01 (I) of the SBLDR. The dimensions of the proposed parking areas appear to meet the requirements in Table 13-8 of the Land Development Regulations. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is not depicted on the plans. 14. The plans shall be revised to depict a bicycle rack as part of the preliminary plat application. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The majority of the proposed parking is located to the side of the building. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The height of the proposed one-story building is 34 ft, which is in compliance with the Land development Regulations. The proposed project is located in a business park in a area where industrial uses exists, so staff feels the scale of the proposed building is compatible with existing buildings in the area. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \d rb\sub\m u n s o n \s k etc h Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant has not yet submitted elevations of the proposed building. 15. The applicant shall submit elevations of the proposed building as part of the preliminary plat application. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant has not yet submitted elevations of the proposed building In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Because the project is in a large lot, industrial area, staff does not feel access to adjacent properties is necessary. However, the Development Review Board should consider the two curb cuts off of Meadowland Drive proposed as part of this project. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans do not currently show a dumpster or solid waste facility. 16. The plans shall be revised to depict storage for solid waste. All dumpsters shall be adequately screened. Landscaping and Screening Requirements The applicant has not yet submitted cost projections for this property. The applicant has not submitted landscaping plans for the property. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\munson\sketch 17. The applicant shall submit building costs as part of the preliminaryplat application 18. The applicant shall submit a landscaping plan for the subject property, prepared in accordance with Section 13.06 of the SBLDR, as part of the preliminary plat application. 19. The applicant shall submit a landscaping budget for the subject property, in compliance with Table 13-9 of the SBLDR, as part of the preliminary plat application. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, in all off-street parking area with twenty-eight (28) or more parking spaces, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and other plants. All interior and perimeter planting shall be protected by curbing. Interior planted islands shall have a minimum dimension of six (6) feet on any one side, and shall have a minimum square footage of sixty (60) feet. Large islands are encouraged. This parking lot contains more than 28 spaces and shall be in compliance with the above. 20. The landscaping plan submitted as part of the preliminary plat application shall conform to Section 13.06(B) of the SBLDR. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage area must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans do not currently depict a snow storage area. 21. The plans shall be revised to depict adequate snow storage areas as part of preliminary plat application. Pursuant to Section 13.06(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any utility cabinets on the site shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board. 22. The plans shall be revised to depict any utility cabinets on the site. They shall be effectively screened to the approval of the Development Review Board prior to final plat approval. View Protection Zone The subject property is located within the Hinesburg Road -North Scenic View Protection Overlay District and thus subject to Section 10.03(H) of the SBLDR. Specifically, no part of any structure within the zone shall exceed an elevation of 393.5 feet above mean sea level plus 5.8 feet for each 1000 feet that said part of said structure is horizontally distant from the Hinesburg Road -North View Protection Zone Base Line shown on the Scenic View Protections Overlay District Map. 23. The applicant shall submit building elevations as part of the preliminary plat application. The building elevations shall include the height of the building as well as the horizontal distance of the building from the Hinesburg Road -North View Protection Zone Base Line, in compliance with Section 10.03(H) of the SBLDR. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \d rb\sub\munson\sketch Other The City Engineer reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated August 25, 2005 (attached). 24. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Engineer, as outlined in his memorandum dated August 25, 2005. 25. The plat plan for the entire Meadowland Business Park PUD shall be submitted as part of the preliminary plat application. The subject property is located within the Industrial Open Space District and as such shall be subject to Section 6.04(F) and 6.05 of the SBLDR. All lots of three acres or more, an open space buffer strip no less than two hundred (200) feet in width shall be maintained along the boundary of the SEQ district. The proposed building is exactly 200 feet from the SEQ boundary. At the discretion of the Development Review Board, the buffer strip either shall be left in its open, natural condition or shall be required to be landscaped in accordance with the standards in Section 3.06(l) to provide appropriate screening of proposed uses from adjacent residential properties. This property does abut residential properties. At this time, the applicant is proposing a significantly sized landscaping berm to be placed at the corner most adjacent to those residential properties. The berm is proposed to be 15 feet in height at its highest point and roughly 160 feet in length. However, the portion of the berm closest the neighboring residences is only proposed to be 4 feet in height. Staff suggests that the portion of the berm closest the residential properties be higher than 4 feet. The applicant and Development Review Board should address this issue at the public hearing. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document before continuing on to preliminary plat submission. Respectfully submitted, 1&kal� xv_ey-e - Cathyan aRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Munson Earth Moving, property owner O'Brien Brothers Partnership, applicant Ian A. Jewkes, Krebs and Lansing c� Permit Number SD- d5 --1 APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) Munson Earth Moving Corporation 85 Shunpike Road Williston, Vermont 05495 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 6.51 Page 157 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) O'Brien Brothers Partnership P.O. Boa 2184 South Burlington, VT 05403 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) Contract to purchase 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Ian A. Jewkes Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, Vermont 05446 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS l qa Meadowland Drive South Burlington, Vermont 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) //5$-- o v 9yV" -G 1 l 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) There is no existing use on this property. b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Anticipated use of property is 15,000 s.f. for offices and 35,000 s.f. for warehouse distribution. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) The proposed building is 50,000 Square Feet. d) Proposed height of building (if applicable) The proposed building will be single story. The roof peak will be 34 feet high. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not Applicable g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Not Applicable 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 0 % Proposed 14.1 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 % Proposed 33.5 % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 0 % Proposed 15.4 % 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, right of way, etc.) Not Applicable 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) None 2 (' C 12) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this may be provided on a separate attached sheet) The owners of record is provided on a separate attached sheet. 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Spring 2006 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is free. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION I have reviewed this t-application and find it to be: e' Complete ElIncomplete it for of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 3 OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES August 3, 2005 Project Parcel Munson Earth Moving 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 Tax Map 1705-00107 Abutters Chase Properties & Development, Ltd PO Box 2283 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0254-00005 Green Acres, Inc. PO Box 2123 South Burlington, VT 05407 Tax Map 0860-R1150 Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 Tax Map 1705-00125 (All under 0860-01150) Diane J. Wessel 70 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0850-00070 Scott L. & Roberta S. Pennington 26 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00026 Larry W. & Ginette D. Brainard 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00028 Donna A. Lee 30 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00030 Russell J. & Pamela A. Smith 32 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00032 Anthony A. & Diane P. Graziano 34 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00034 Paul A. & Charyl P. Houchens 36 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00036 David W. & Heather H. Main 38 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 1002-00038 John M. & Susan M. Hood 28 Dubois Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0575-00028 Robert M. & Linda H. O'Kelly 30 Dubois Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0575-00030 Ralph J. & Jeanette M. Mitchell 32 Dubois Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0575-00032 John Larkin 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tax Map 0860-01375 Bill Szymanski, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4io6 CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS Meadowland Industrial Park Lot No. 2 Meadowland Drive 8/25/05 1. Lots should be connected at least with an emergency gravel drive and serve as an access to rear hydrant. 2. The 18 inch drain pipes along the east side should be connected with an inlet or manhole and a 24 inch pipe extended easterly beyond pedestrian easement toward pond. 3. Existing street trees should be shown on the plan. � Lot 10 S�smmer Lec StB/ R Rbn=7aa 0' s-� Y4rC JBT P.4Jg ..Pow aew sN/th-J91.35'� Mnpy h-192.77' to BO•PoIY und✓9ra�ne MP lc Pod - net p esh-tcNan fMg mrdr B' hv. h-32]9' .'-. B /b✓. W1:192 ' pw � �.�f- r..-;stare nyfront I tMw eMr. / Q \ 'v7c ,'@ �" `�"P// 3 •. \ l� nymoar I !I ".y / APPror• Moefkn 7. \ P erklhp auAage \\ I " a9v. a° � w�rl��Rw�,' -JS sr� -! i_-_ .• 1. � =.�'� i/ / RAn�JJ7.5' . Tjpiw New 4'PVC SORJB saner ♦ I l Lot 1 Por f�v;rdM / hi3120'. Mlmldl Earel AtoMog Ca% sw,;c to �dWWd 1 i �l Z -a.02 4w- N� j �� Exlstft Pond w 4 P 8b Rdjr 3374' 1 1 New saoWeo-y // //1/ l l l// /may. l (�l �'Mv x,=Jz9. ]' I i underground Poway fo / .9 v/ !n. r new frarrsMrmr / nv. Wr-3,XI80' S k . //%,. s-002 ;�f/ / l ! l l our--002 M a �- "�� sg RECEIVED New IB' ADS N12 l l / / / ! / / My our-JJz go' / 1, s'a°z `° l bJR-PIgDOdtra' d//dh9taO ..... (4/6-6'by 120) end mt' \ SORJS sower C l / ' 9 I 11- 1 I ' AUG A �4//yyIp, 05 Mstog dory �.. 44 gn a Pow4- o canna (BJ. l / 6rMed Ftocr aASS c Ben 4JJh✓ 1I 1 1CRY of :, Pwer 1 ✓a�W,y5�/�j'B�/Q(�,�{� 50' .c l l� I (4) M-JJ 2' "FV 1. B'Mu M-.ulz' � I l I l/ I �/ l w /�� £ / /l / / I � t• M. Wt-,uv r iv4 P✓C l t pl I I I t ! / l // j sORdS ,c l l / l ) ✓j s-o.pt / ! ! / ✓ I � I `""_ 1 `t•!Ilj � l s iMods� ,ww4"P�e' �' � j ! m � I I i ft,3s,epw ou � . Mu r-JJJ.70' 91 1 hw+•SAO' !( Lei J e u ^�. s-aoz L' Act JAW *HAM YK J!7 P. v New J/4' k 11 j l! l I l 2° / l shin-oH TM a New 4" P&C eV units sawNotes s a ww . lb• 1 1 I 1 o W1-JJ417' (J) a' M✓. I !III \ s-aoz J/� / / e• M✓. ou J3a 4' �f I I 1 I I 1. Ibb M not o baw,da y r P oPw-tr /Men sna.,, a•. m.•n o PM•, d,Nri e ,y�4Wa^w Cal* Z ~ r P l t \ / \ 1�" �p ikft wMnds Pm*- by C/M &Vhe q Associoras. rF�em. IQ BY f• \\\\\\\ l 7g- `\ / J / _ _ - -\"\� 1 1 �i / y 2 AbattMg Prroe-ry /Mao ora rYd» city of sash BwM9ro, rm Nms (M :/ \\\\l� / a�0 �� qX r�= =��_= \„/ l Y - ` \ 11 ..,1 / II diD✓tdl J. •\�\\� 1 / _�1-=' v= / --_ - .iae \ Pn 40 P 11 1, I I J ah'rd Dark/ dyafms sYrna v4. twn w„nor NpPMg ogrmn. or Pow Ts' Nu L- \ -1� T\ �111\I \\ - +��� \ ...il �. /jI �. ..._,\ «.d w/eve i\\ \ \\\ \\ 1� ��/ / ! lF //� --__�\ /._ \\\li..a \ / .✓ / / ' ;/ //�� ;.,� h✓Wr JJB:ff• //�\\.\ n t \>` +w,� � „?e��-'/ / II / �II� it f, New landscaping h/ M wa i.. r,�e/ �1 / b / / / 11/I II - \ \� � \\\\ wr- �Fent'_A/, -B.9slo sj° / 44" 4'dm /tw 1 V £asEWONnanent Lot; 2 f= Munson Earth MaKh Corp Y'o/ume:651 Pog 157 111 l� l l l l l ll l ll l l Deceinber IB 003 / / - ' 1 WO II Acreoge: 8.13 / I ^\� / ScaPrn9 berm NoW f imp* - — "`�'... Honer & MmN A601S. .Scott & Rabe to ? t.Tbette Y-1 If P.?B2 j Location Map Owner /nfonnatkvl: Munson Earth Moving Corp. 85 5)Yunp ke Raod WNW—, V7 05495 AjWk'ortt tnformatlon: O$tien Brolhers Partnership P.O. Box 2184 South Bur/Blgton, VT 05403 Arem Lot 2 = B.13 acres Zan/na.• lnoVstrial and Open -ace Zoning District Lot Conwoae Lkbt Ar Of OT A N ExM PovenrMt o f.. ox N/A 34000 et 1 141x 1 XX Po— B4B42 M I lq4xl N A Tgfd Co I14B4t U JJBx 3Q[ nmf C. 154x _Vend - s✓..y ,..,ea am,e mpwty tM e- Mf w xby s® rM eeeu• mmnae �( N14mt M✓ .ewm bin ---`: • �� � man e..h� -.-- R.. mM.e aa4. O' m, 40' w, 170' mo, 200' Bogy Sccle 1 = 40• FOR PERMIT REVIEW