Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-06-88 - Decision - 0472 Meadowland Drive#SD-06-88 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING O'BRIEN MEADOWLANDS, LLC — 472 MEADOWLAND DRIVE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-06-88 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC, hereinafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 50,000 sq. ft. building. The amendment consists of adding 10,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine space, for a total of 60,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area, 472 Meadowland Drive. The Development Review Board held a public hearing on November 7, 2006. No one was present at the meeting. Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1) The applicant is seeking to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 50,000 sq. ft. building. The amendment consists of adding 10,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine space, for a total of 60,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area, 472 Meadowland Drive. 2) The owner of record of the subject property is O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC. 3) The subject property is located in the Industrial & Open Space (10) Zoning District. 4) The plan submitted is entitled, "Site Plan Meadowlands Business Complex Lot 2 Meadowland Industrial Park 472 Meadowland Drive South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated May 3, 2006, with a last revised date of 9/19/06. 5) All proposed additions will be internal to the building; therefore there are no changes to the footprint of the building or related dimensional requirements. 6) According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the 60,000 square feet of contractor or building trade facility will require 30 spaces plus one space for each employee. The number of employees is unknown at this time. As the applicant is proposing 100 parking spaces, the site shall be limited to 70 employees. 7) According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, the 60,000 square feet of contractor or building trade facility is estimated to generate 26.4 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The applicant has estimated 50 PM peak hour trip ends and was granted approval for such at the original final plat approval. This is acceptable. #SD-06-88 DECISION Motion by QuLW , seconded by &Ef to approve Final Plat Application #8D-06-88 of O'Brien Meadowlands, LLC, subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations shall remain in full effect, except as amended herein. 2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plat submitted by the applicant, and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3. The site shall be limited to no more than 70 employees. If at any time the collective businesses on the site employ more than that number, the applicant shall either provide additional parking or return to the Board to request a parking waiver. 4. Any changes to the final plat plan shall require approval of the South Burlington Development Review Board. 5. The final plat plan (site plan) shall be recorded in the land records within 180 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Mark Behr —(R/nay/abstain/not present Matthew Birmingh m — yea/nay/abstainffiot presen John Dinklage — ' e nay/abstain/not present Roger Farley — e nay/abstain/not present Eric Knudsen — e , nay/abstain/not present Peter Plumeau — yea/nay/abstain/ of pre Gayle Quimby — be Wnay/abstain/nof present Motion carried by a vote of -7 - O - 0 Signed this �day of 2006, by John Dinkla e Chair -2- #SD-06-88 Please note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRCP 76 in writing, within 30 days of the date this decision is issued. The fee is $225.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long. You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy; finality). -3-